The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2013-08027A_ - _--- __ -. -� 801 BAY ESPLANADE � ,��' FLS2013-08027A . ___._._�_____. �._...._ _ , Single family dock �� ; ' t I,� � ' � �� Blackwood Dock .' �,�1��1� � Zoning: Low Medium Density Re Atlas #: 249A LL ' �NYJC: £�PAi�AEt�if �. � } ` :-' �y��y/►�a_ -- ; Planning & Development Department � � ��t��=l -Fl�x�ible S�aridard Develo ment A p pplication ° Detached Dwellings, Duplexes orAssociated Accessory Use/Structures IT IS INCUMFsENT UPON THE APPLICAIYT TO SUBMIT COMPLEfE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADIN6, DECEP'fIVE, IIVCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YQUR APPUCATION. ALLAPPUCATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLEfELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMtTTED IN PfRSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) _ TQ_7HE.P_IANNlN6-&-DEU€LOPMENT DEFARTMENF SY NOON ON-THESCHfDt1t�D D€ADCiNEDATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPUCATION MATERIAlS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPtES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTEQ FOR REVtEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMIITEE. PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOIOED INTO SETS. THE APPUCANT, BY FIUN6 THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: �� APPUCATION FEE: �2� (if for derached dwellings o� duplexesJ OR 100 (if for acceuory uses/shudures for detoched dwellingsJduplexes) PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): William Blackwood MAILING ADDRESS: 627 Bay Espianade PHONE NUMBER 727-251-7236 EMAIL• wblackwo�tampabay.rr.com . AGENT OR REPRESEMA E STerri Skapik, Woods Consultina MAILING ADDRESS: 1714 County Road 1, Suite 22 Dunedin, FL 34698 PHONE NUMBER: 727-786-5747 �- �, G C� EMAIL: terriskapik�woodsconsulting_org � ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 801 Bay Esplanade PARCEL NUMBER(S): 05-29-iS54666-033-0010 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MANDALAY SUB BLK 33, LOT 1 PROPOSED USE(5): p�vate dock for singie family residential property DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Construd single family dock (996 sq ft) with 2 Specificolly ideniify the request; (include al/ requested code flexibi/ity; e.g., redudion in required num6er of pa�king spates, heigh� setbocks, lot size, loi width, specifrc use, etc.): Planning 8 Development Departrne�t, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tef: 727-562�d567; Fax: 727-562�865 Page 1 of 7 Rev'ised 01112 ° Cl�arwater U ,_ , ,. ,, . ... :. ._ .. ---- .. ... ' ' F" ;' ; � ��i � � �Q I� ; : . _ �. , _. .. , _ _ ^ , ; � � `' y f '., � ;. = �'- ': Planning & Development Departiment Flexi�ile Standarc� Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INfORMATION IS fIILED OUT, IN ff5 ENTIRETY. FAIIURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORAA WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPUCATION BEING FOUND INtOMPLETE AND POSSiBLY DEFERRED UNTII THE FOLLOWING APPUCATION CYCLE. ---- _ _ .___ __-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ 20NING DISTRICT: LMDR FUTURE LAND USE PIAN dE51GNATiON: RU IXISTING USE (currently existing on site): single family residential PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): n0 Change SITE AREA: sq. ft. �•174 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (toWl square footage of ali buildings): Existing: wA s9• ft. Proposed: wA sq. ft. Maximum Ailowable: wA sq. ft. GRO55 FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be mukiple uses): First use: wA sq. ft. Second use: wA sq. ft. Third use: WA sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATlO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site}: F�cisting: WA Proposed: WA Maximum Ailowable: WA BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings): ��ning; WA sq. ft. ( WA 96 of site) Proposed: WA sq. ft. ( wA % of sitej Maximum Permitted: WA sq. ft. ( wA � of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Euisting: WA sq. ft. (�`1�A % of site) Proposed: WA _ sq. k. ( wA % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: WA sq. ft. ( N/A Proposed: WA sq. ft. ( WA 9� of site) % of site) Planning 8� Development Departrne�t,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fau: 72T-562-4865 Page 2 of 7 Revised 01/12 � e� . � . ......... .. .• ' ._ ._ .�.. ... . f ;;� �U� � �J�3 � � z.__ �___ - IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO totai � � ``; ' - ", -- ( square footage of impervious areas divided by .he total square fdota�eTof.e�ti�e�si�e�, ; - Existing: N!A •-- k- ' _' _ . ,T Proposed: N!A Maximum Permitted: N/A DENSiTY (units, rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGFiT: Existing: WA Existing: WA Proposed: N!A Proposed: N/A Maxi_m_um Permi�t�sl:_ __ WA _ _ _ _ Maximum-Permitted:- N/� __ __ _ _ OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: N!A Proposed: N/A Minimum Required: WA Note: A parking demand study musi be provided ln conjunction with ony request to reduce the amount of required off-street parking spaces. Please see the adopfed Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROIECT UPON COMPLETiON? $ 40,000 ZONiNG DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PR�PERTY: North: Lii� � i� South: („ yY� t) � East: L. M � t2 west: L IN� � jZ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I� tha ��n�ior�;onn�,�r,l� ��L,n,O:yl�w ` �,�;ai aii �_� • 2/ �,�- $ 5�%or�� to er�d suux.ribeii b�f�re me inis i � �i ciay of representations made in this application are true and �L accurate to the best of my knowledge a�d authorize � �T• to me and/or by City representatives to visit and photograph the _G��l�tJl'�V f/t.�j��F-�-�^-•i who is personally known has property described in this appliption. roduced �.--� p as identification. '�t �-,%�-!=�� Signature of property owner or Notary My con expires: � * MY COMAIISSION # EE 092145 _ EXPIRES: July 18, 2015 Planning & Development Depariment,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727�562-4865 Page 3 of 7 Revised 01/12 �� . ..i ` ,��J - � �Oi� � o Planning & Dev��u�emt�:C��t�hgnent ��lear�vater Flexible Standard Develo ment A�lication � p pp � Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT (FES) APPLICATION, ALL Fl5 APPLICATIONS FOR A CINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED �WELLING, DUPLEX, OR ACC�SSORY USE/STRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH ElTHER A S:NGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWEWNG OR DUPLEX SHALL INCLUDE Q PLOT PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: -- I.Y Responses-to the-GeneraF Appiieabii�ty crit�ria-as-seE forth in Section 3-914�A: The attached Flexibfe Standard �evelopment Application Generai Applicability Criteria sheet shali be used to provide these responses. lY Responses to the flexibility aiteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the 2oning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Standard Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. l� A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions,�,�-�g�,,location of all current struduresrmprovements, location of all pubtic and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. A 1�- ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as r" provided in F.S. § �23.083, the appliption must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. B If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detaifed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on pr"ryate and commercial docks. �1� ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH (diameter at breast height), and species on the parcel proposed for development r` with a DBH of four inches or more and identifying those trees proposed to be removed. 0" A site plan with the fo�lowing informat on: / ❑ Nor[h � rrow, sca��, location �nd date pr ared. 1'��/ ` ❑ a 5 i�1��❑ a.s� ,� 0 r Ji,'�, � ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCI), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. Locati6ln, setback�s and �e of all exis�ing and propo es d building and strudures. Location of all existing and proposed parki�g areas, sidewaiks and drlGeways. Location, type of material and height of all existing and proposed fences. Location of all existing and proposed utilities, including water, sewer, gas, and stormwater. Location of all existing utility easements, including Official Records book and page numbers, and any proposed utility easements. ,/ � : ,._ _..�_�. N �,�'C Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height; building mater at3; and concealment of -...-- --_ _ _ __ ___..._ -: all mechanical equipment located on the roof. Planning 8 Devefopment Departrttent,lOU S. Myrtie Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 7 Revised 01/12 '' � �� ' �''t� � � 2� 33 . � ..� � . ._ � � �.�_w.�____._.�____�__,: u � Fi �,� i,t :. � ..��_�. � 5 ° Cl�arwat�r plannin��& ��q�r�}en,f I�pa�bnent � Flexible Standard Developn�ent Application � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (b) 6ENERAL AAPUCABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAININ6 HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRI7ERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH P�R TNIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAI. 1. The proposed development of the_land_wiil be in_harmony with the.scale, bulk, coverage, density and_character of-adjacent _._ _-- properties in which it is located_ SEE ATT"ACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significanUy impair the value thereof. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affed the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. S. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impactr, on adjacent properties. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 FOR WRITfEN RESPONSES. Planning 8 Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 7 Revised 01/12 LL ° � earwater � � _ , tt �i ��Gi ry � ��IV ) . .... � ...- ... Plannin��DQy;,e�pt�em�p�tt�ent Flexible Sta.ndard Dev��o�i%��-�A�T��iion Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLlCABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE�S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH tN THE ZOIVING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBIECT PROPERTY IS LOCATE'J. IXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRtTERION IS BEING COMPUED WI7'H PER THIS DEV£LOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1_ -S�E-�TTACWED EXHtBIl" 2 FOR 1�VR{TTEN RE�PONSES: z. 3. a. 5. 6. �. s. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. SEE ATiACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WR1TfEN RE�PONSES. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. SEE A-tTACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. SEE Al-fACHED EXHIBIT 2 FOR WRITTEN RESPONSES. Planning & Devebpment Departrnent, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 7 Revised 01H2 ', , __:E � AUG - � 2�J►3 ; � ° Clearwater Plan�i��,.tfi „�d��r��re�ut°.�epatrtn_n�ent � 4�, U \ Flexible Standard Dev'el�p��p�,�ca'ti�n Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all properly owners on deed — PRINT fuli names: V1/illiam Blackwood 2. That (I am/we are) the owner{s) and record title holder(s) of the foliowing described property: 801 Bay Esplanade, Parcel Identification Number. 05-29-15-54666-033-0010 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): Single Family Dock 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Terri Skapik, Woods Consulting as (his/their) agent(sj to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affed such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and ad on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes C►ty representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), the undersigned auth ' eby certify that the foregoing is true and corred. L',�� 'L / � --'� -�� i �--u` Property Owner ` Property Owner Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, THIS %' � DAY OF i STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON � � 3 . PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN DEPOSED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVfT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. ��t�Y P�q��o JOHN DORAN �. *� * MYCONMfSSION#EE092145 N ry Public Signature s, t EXPIRES: Juty 18, 2015 Notary Seal/Stamp �'�OFn°"\O B0"��'"'�No1a1' � My Commission Expires: Planni�g 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562�1567; Fax: 727562-4865 Page 7 of 7 Revised 0�/12 EXHIBIT 1: _ Written Submittal Requirements � �� Fiexible Development Application '� �'; �; a�� -� �� ', General Applicability Criteria � ° ""- �.,_s.� _ _ _ __ p ; - -.. �� - - - - -� ,':�' _ .__ . .,- � � �,-,. , -; `� -��- 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmonv with the-scafe"tiu�lk �covera�e densitv and character of adiacent properties in which it is located. The proposed single family private dock will be in character of the' adjacent properties. The existing properties are all residential properties and most, if not all, have private single family ---doeks.-Therefore-the proposed single family private dock is consistent with the docks at the adjacent properties. The proposed single family private dock will be in harmony with the scale, bulk and coverage of the private single family docks in the immediate area even with an increased length as q p P , ��. - g � � <� p �'b � k� � .�.�.:t le' .t� ' ��E �s;� � lar n s�ze�s� � re uested. As ro osed �t��e sin fe fa�nil � riv°a�`�d� i, ;��`Fi�',r,� gt��l�,,.�` � =to�h�e�clocks�in,�%he�i°,,f ed,��#e�artea�' The�cT�o'�cic��n"o'v�'e�d�`out�a�n'cl�a�xra�fr��h"�� 1t��aavoid.a The Pinellas County Environmental Management Department performed a site visit, at our request, to map the extent of the seagrass beds and they are shown on the attached plan view drawings. Ba��l�o�t��i�t�fiel�cl rn"s"�ectiorr;�:tti'e`�clet�`rm�ned°t�� oc� `oc tec��"vy eie �' ,sl�ow,��to=avoid impacting::the�`gr"ass beds t�ir"ougli �propell'er��o�had g�effect�� As regards the existing private docks in the immediate area, please see the attached Woods Consulting AERIAL Exhibit 1. This exhibit was created to show the proposed dock in relation to the existing docks in the immediate area. �Immediately to th`e"nortli of theli�oi�ct`si�e'�'re`�f�iir =� private¢docks that`are""all`60`"to'�75y'ft'��n:�lengtti. All of these docks appear to have been permitted so that the terminal platforms are located outside (waterward) of the grass beds. The property immediately to the south is Mango St (public right of way) and there is no dock. The properties farther to the south all have private docks but they are shorter. The aerial shows the grass line diminishes toward the south. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discoura�e the appropriate development and use of adiacent land and buildin� or si�nificantiv impair the value thereof. The proposed single family private dock will not hinder or discourage appropriate use and development of adjacent land or impair the value thereof. In fact, a dock can significantly improve the value of surrounding properties. The proposed single family private dock will not hinder or discourage development at adjacent properties as the proposed dock abuts a public right of way to the south where docks (with mooring) will likely never be built. The dock was positioned ctoser to the south abutting property line to provide as much side setback to the north as possible without reducing the size of the slip spaces. Because the docks/slips will be parallel to the main dock, more width is 1 . ,_ needed. Although variances for length and width are being requestecl, the proposed length is consistent��vith several larger existing private docks in ::learwater Harbor. The width variance is needed to allow boats to moor parallel to the seagrass beds and not back in to slips to prevent prop scarring. The proposed dock will not impede use of the waterway in this area. 3. The proposed development will not adverselv affect the health or safetv of persons residin� or workin� in the neighborhood of the proposed use The proposed single family private dock will be for the use by the upland resident and will not adversely affect health or safety of the residents or persons working in the neighborhood. The ---- --dockwFllbe-built#o-conformwitlrCountyDockCoder. - - --- - 4. The proposed development is desi�ned to avoid traffic con�estion. The proposed single family private dock will be for the use of the upland resident and therefore no additional traffic will be created with the proposed dock. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the communitv character of the immediate vicinitv of the parcel proposed for development The proposed dock is consistent with the zoning, future land use for a private single family residence. The proposed dock is consistent with the size and scale of larger docks that are located in the immediate area. 6. The desi�n of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects includin� visual acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on the adiacent properties There will be no negative adverse effects visually as the dock will be constructed with wood fixed in place by wooden pilings. The construction materials and installation requirements will adhere to the Pinellas County dock construction code. There will be no walls or enclosures on the dock; only the covered roof and one boat lift. There will be no negative adverse effects acoustically as this will operate only as a single family private dock for the upland resident. There are no high/dry slips, no toad out, no wash racks, no fueling facilities, etc. 2 ' 4 '` .� � F . '"'�. . ., . . ..... , �. . . .. ' (: 1 � �• �' : � � ;� ,i ': � �+J� ° E f ','� . _Y' _ . .j .. - 7 � 1_...,...__,-..,._.__....._ ,...- ... . r':.n.iVP,�. - . _.. {�.....--._� :.� . ... ._ _. .._.. � . . .�-.,--..,. _ ., . _ EXHIBIT 2 �� ` e _ � Written Submitta) Requirements ; - �� -�' � �� t �� . � � ._ Responses to the Fiexibility Criteria for the specific use being re�qi��st�ed as set fo`rth'irr. the Zoning Districts in which the subje�t property is proposed '�`"��= -- -. � _... __ Dock Criteria Section 3-601C1.g (i) and (ii) g. Deviations. (i) The applicant is aware the community development coordinator may grant - ___ _ -deviations from-the requirements of this secfion as a Level One (minimum standard) approval provided that signed and notarized statements of no objection are submitted from adjacent waterfront property owners, as well as signed and notarized statements on the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority permit application. In the case of 801 Bay Esplanade, the City of Clearwater is the owner of the south adjacent property (Mango Street Public Right of Way) and it's our understanding such notarized letters of no objection can only be reviewed through this review process. The other adjacent neighbor to the north is not willing to sign a notarized letter of no objection for the proposed dock. Therefore, in the event that such statements cannot be obtained, we understand the application for deviations may be approved by the community development coordinator, provided that the proposed dock will result in no navigational conflicts. We further understand, such deviations may be approved through a Level One (flexible standard) approval process based on one of the following: (a) The proposed dock location needs tc� he arl;��tP� r� �r�±o�� environmentally sensitive areas; or (b) The property configuration or shallow water depth precludes the placement of a dock in compliance with the required dimensional standards; however, the proposed dock will be similar in dimensional characteristics as surrounding dock patterns. The proposed dock location needs to be adjusted;��n�,length��nc�,_�n�ii�t�i o�protect the environmental sensitive areas where seagrass beds are present. Attached is an aerial that clearly the shows the seagrass beds in the near-shore areas. The seagrass beds are widest to the north of the property and appear to thin toward the south. We requested the Pinellas County's Environmental Management Dept. to perform a site visit to identify, delineate and verify the presence of protected resources; specifically seagrass beds. They visited and concurred that the seagrass line shown on the attached plans is accurate (Sheet 2 of the Woods Consulting dock plan drawings). �Th�"e�se�a� ��s�l�ne i'S � �T�i�e p�ased �'dock�� .��. 1�_�. �¢b'`�a�t�"iioort��o prevent�jic,tential pro`p scarring of seagrass b�ed� Positioning the slips parallel to the seagrass beds required a wider dock and exceeds the maximum width and red�•ces the required setbacks. Our opinion was that it was less impact to widen the dock than to further lengthen it if the slips were to be perpendicular to the grass beds. Excessive length we agree would be out of character with the docks in the immediate area. ii) No dock shall be allowed to deviate from the length requirements specified �� 1� �� - -n ��' ..- � re-than an additional 50 percent of the allowable length-or project into the navigable portion of the waterway by more than 25 percent of such waterway, whichever length is less. In no case shall the length of the dock exceed 250 feet, except as stipulated in Section 3-601.C.1.g.iii and iv below. It is not possible to construct a dock even with the allowed deviation of 50% of the maximum length requirements. The property at the waterfront is 67.5 ft and even with this 50% additional length; the max deviation would be a total of 50 ft measured from the seawall. The seagrass beds extend to approximately 53 ft. We are very certain the dock will not impede navigation due to the width of the waterway in this location which �? �„ --is�-approximate " 900 . The dock as proposed with the length variance will extend only �� . ��;� �!, ;9% of the width of the waterway which is less than 25% the width of the waterway — a ` criterion generally accepted for the maximum length docks can extend into a waterway. We believe the proposed length variance is consistent with the private single family docks in the immediate area. Please see the attached Woods Consulting AERIAL Exhibit 1. This exhibit was created to show the proposed dock in relation to the existing docks in the immediate area. Immediately to the north of the project site are four private docks that are all 60 to 75 ft in length. All of these docks have terminal platforms are located water-ward of the seagrass beds. The property immediately to the south is Mango St (public right of way) and there is no dock. The properties farther to the south all have private docks but they are shorter. The aerial shows the seagrass line thins toward the south. �a ��;<��:. C, �.,�., � U� �i``� �' . , ` _ , _ , { �� . , , ;. _._ ___ __._. ,�... � , �` �'Y �; �i1G -� � ��E3 � ;- � "=� A �j� I � � , __..�-..........- _^-_..w_.�._...._. . � %;i '' ,,� .._ ._...�___ SURVEY OF 801 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33767 LOT 1, BLOCK 33, MANDALAY, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35, , INCLUSIVE, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF - - _ = � , PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ; - ' _.�U� � � ��1� ,.. �� . � j, �._✓'� _ w _-----°�°.; • �r , - LOT 2 o . . � .. - Q : t 1 �. F � ,- -;; � �� ;�. . Y. ` �� N90°00'00"E 111.00' M P z � _ ''�,�-.'� _ _ ___ -- - I li )_ _ _ _ _ _ __ a t�°` w J � 0.1' OFF � FIP z 12.90 • w WALL 0.8'OFF _-.°: . • : ..:....:: m � � ��0�.,�: N I i°r, A� c�o 25.80' � W Y N � W � O N a � � 27.40' FIR U N � ••`•°; ' ' � 13.84' � ,?E 5 14.80' 14.92' � RES# 801 � LOT 1 E:52' pp J 17.UU� � � BRICK C � � � 0 BAY - WINOOW � � N CLF 1.1'ON x WALL 0.6'Orf S90°00'00"iN 111.00'(M)(P) MANGO STREET PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY BAY I 13.70' 0 C�ON PILINGS ;� a �_ 3 .13' ° ° � F w w � I � u � � � W J j N � 17.15'! `'"' o v� Z r. UNLESS NO7ED OTHERN7S�, 1HIS IS AN AS—BUILT SURVEY SHOWING IMPROVEMENIS IN RELATiON TO PROPERN AND PIAT IAONUlAENTS FOUND 1HIS SURVEY IS MADE FOR 7HE EXCLUSIVE USE Of TNE CURRENT OWNERS OF THE O �O� ZO� 4O� PROPERTY AND ALSO iHOSE WFiO PURCHASE, MORTGAGE OR GUARANiEE THE 'fliLE TNERETO NAiHIN ONE YEAR OF 1HE FlELD �ATE NOTED ON TriIS Sl1RVEY. �'�q� S`�°" �^"� SCALE: 1"= 20' FMRI.NCE E EV�'YCSEC i EYCCS3` ^h�^ � krHrca - X- 4' CHnWLI4K:cNC_ - �- 6' WUODFE4C= NO1ES: (1) IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 61G17-6.0031-4-E, IF LOCA710N OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF RECORD, 0'MER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLATS, IS RE�UIRED, 1HI5 INfORMAiION MUST BE FURNISHED TO iHE SURVEYOR ANO MAPPER. (2) IF APPIJCABLE, FENCES SHOWN lAEANDER ON OR OFF IINES. (APPROX.) (3) NO EXCAVATION OR MAPPING OF UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS HAS BEEN PERFORMED. CORNER IAARKERS ARE i/2' DIAME7ER UNLESS NOTED OiHERWISE. BASIS OF BEARINGSIS R/W LINE (USING PLAT BEAR�N6 OR ASSUMED) UNLESS NOTED OiHERWISE LEGEND: (c) = c�cuu7m, q= cuttve Nu�aedt , ce= c�e� eoX �P= �GNT POLE, C/S = CONCREfE 51AB, CLF = CFWN 11NK FENCE, CONC = CONCRETE CSW = CONCRETE S�DEWALK, (D) = DEED, DE = DRAINAGE EASDAEN7, E&= ELECIRIC BOX EOW = EDGE OF WAIER, E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT, (F) = FlElD,F/C = FENCE CORNER, FCIR a FlR CMPED, FXC — FOUND X CUT, FCM = i01JN� CONCRETE NONUAIENT, FlP m FWND IRON PIPE, FlR = FOUND IRON R00, fN : FOUN� NAIL, FND = FOUND NAIL k DISK GA = Gl1Y ANCHOR, ID = IDENTFlCA710N, (AI) = NEISURED, IAH = AIANNOLE, NCF � NO AIARKER FOUNO, OHW = OVERHEAD H7RE, 0/A - O�R ALL, (P) = PLAT, P/E=POOL EOUIP. PP = POWER POLE. P08 = POINT Oi BEqNNMG, POC = PqNT OF COIAAIENCEAIENT, PRM = PERAIANENT REFERENCE NONUMENT, R/W = RIGHT OF WAY, SIR = SET t/2' IRON ROU LB 6912, SND = SET NAIL ANO OISK LB 6912, TNF= TRANSFORMEft, TOB = TOP OF BANK, TP= PHONE PmESTAL, UE = UIIUiY EA56AENT, WB � WAiER BOX, YAF = WOOD iENCE Know It Now, Inc. Fia.ida Business Cerfificate Cf LOCATON = 2017 HE7DELBERG AVcNUE, DUNEDIN, FL Au�horizatlonNumberLB6912 VOICE 727-415-8305 FAX 727-736-24 CERTIFIED EXCLUSIVELY TO THE BELOW PARTIES WILLIAM BLACKWOOD � I HEftEBY CERTIFY THAT THiS SKETCH OF SURVEY WJS MADE UNDER IAY RESPONSIBLF CHARGE AND TO THE BEST OF A1Y KNOWLEDGE ANI BELIEF SND SURVEY IAEEfS THE MINIAIUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SE! FORTH BY THE Fl.ORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LPND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER SJ-17 RORIDA ADAIINISfRATIVE CODE FURTHEf2 , THIS DOCUA�ENT IS ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND SEALED PURSUANf TO SECTION 472.027, OF THE RORIDA STAMES MD CHAP�R 5J-17 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION CODE. Surveya & 61app=� ��mtr_r 4c's5 �KM� DATE OF FIELD WORK: 4-1-13 � �ra �� DATE SIGNED 4-2-73 y, hA,`� �� :\ y�� P ��„R FLORIDASURVEYOR@AOL.CONI BILL HYATT ,; �'`._G , , ,- `. SCALE: 1" = 30' NOTES: NI • NORTH SETBACK TO POLES = 1 FT � • NORTH SETBACK TO DOCK = 21.6 FT �tl E• SOUTH SETBACK TO DOCK = 21.6 FT " °• SOUTH SETBACK TO LIFT/COVER = 15.7 FT � • DOCK WIDTH = 23.6 FT • LIFT COVER DIMENSIONS: 15 FT X 23 FT • DOCK OVERALL LENGTH = 64.6 FT* 'LABELED DASHED LINE IS MAX LENGTH OF 64.6 FT AS MEASURED FROM SEAWALL AND ASSUMES MEASUREMENT FOR DOCK LENGTH BEGINS AT P/L AS IT EXISTS WATERWARD OF SEAWALL LOCATION i 67.5 LF OF WATERFRONT PARCELBOUNDARY 4.0 --------- � — 64.6 21 6.0 —I � 59.5 1.1 Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SEA GRASS AS VERIFIED BY RECENT SITE VISIT PERFORMED BY PINELLAS COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DEPT. EXTENDED PROPERTY LINE ;— 46.0 4.5K LIFT W/ COVER ' f i LL.tS � � 21.6 15.7 15.1 -- --------� - —�---- EXTENDED PROPERTY LINE MAX LENGTH OF 64.6 FT AS MEASURED FROM SEAWALL 60 FT ROW MANGO ST. Thu, 24 Oct 2013 - 2:59pm F:\PROJECTS\Blackwood 801 Bay Esplanade (544-12)\CAD\801 BAY ESPLAIVADE 10-23-13.dwg SHEET 2 FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF WOODS CONSULTING AUTHORIZATION #27664 1714 �o��. R� ,, 5�,� ZZ 801 BAY ESPLANADE DUN(EDIN FL 34698 FNf (727� 786-7479 REVISED: MODIFIED DOCK PLAN VI EW TOTAL SQUARE FEET WATERBODY WIDTH >850 FT WATERFRONT WIDTH 67.5 LF MHW +o.�a� MLW -�.2s' ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD-1988 0 SCALE: 1" = 50' F'RIVATE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE—FAMILY ( Appiicatfon# (OFFICIAL USE ONLYj C � ' �a�. 'P�' ''i� ��" � ^ �•� !4� • 4 ' M. - ��r ��;� ffiDf Z y'h. Y . p 'A� '.[. � } } �. H 6FaF � t �IPy� i' "` � -: �i �f �., � p R; ��s � } � .,-�.. M1 �� F . R b��" � k � i � ' k�,. � �� ` �'8 , � '�.� �} p�,E�(� �, R�r .�5.�, '"a _ %.� �a.'.. .�'v'�t � +`:�e,,+ —,_.. ..5i:.� _N� ,rfP ., i i ^ � .@ ti , #�� }�n' f , y*Y "p �� ;. � . ��,,,� \ �"T.. �� ' �` `� 4 � ��CT�NqEi�. ,,.;... � ., , . x � . ..,�" ` �� _ � ..,�..�,�, rk `C _. S �^G ��s �.4 �� t �' F h�t � �TM a y �• i;s �� fc,� r � h . � � � Y � '�,� r: � "� � �' ��tin� � � sv ,.a , y�' ��. "` ^, ` a r � :. ��. . rgtRS �'r.l.�. r� .�"� sM kfi ��. � '` � ;y �gk � x � = K �. h x ,� '� H ' � , � � � �, � �.�, �� -� �80') BAY E ��.�� £� � . � �:� � ��; �� . „� � � �� ,a�.�aRWUATi , �,,K �� r:' �. ;�_ ,. y � ,: � �" a` �� r F�� *� �.: ;,� ,�. . � .�, �, . .� : � �, �i`,� , � � � � ; a � y � a �� ' . ., � ; ' � 05/29/15/54k � � � s� . ; .., �v; < � , �. � � � �� . � ?�1�� fk.� 1 b a �� . f . � � � . � ' , z * � � �- ,. }$ i �-s4 .. _ .. - �n,r�s a �'_ # !. . . :; ° _. si .M .,�ar.�„�r..° . *�� +rrmr n,�. srM!' rF.,,�y>,.r�'`W.0 y � ~ : , � . �. � . : ,.� `,. w �;� �;� ..,� .;-, x � �� .�� .�:�� , ::��T�IJDED PR , .,, :� : " 01 ' ;�� .� � y� �`� �a � � ,� "�.��,�� ° � � �� ,,� �,� �, ��` ��« � '�'x"=�.. = e _ � � � �� ' ��' _ � � ,,..�.> , y�� Qy� � � '� � � �a. , '�r Y yq, � �'TR' 9�j �~ �{ .c� tc�d' 4' m�y�,..•• ' at�`.a =� .�k ��" �h}"` w� `�p2��+7� . I Tn .. X3 . , �. ,_ t p ✓k Ha. va * ' .�" '?, . � .�, Y- �t-F ^ty� i•9° '�"`^� � A . ' uSbl ap,�'�� .r 2 ; � �� ,,t� � , `t., . - . .� q +� �� :� # . ' µ i A..�w) � �"' ��S . � . . ."y+'F � i' '"- � .;�� .` � � . :. ? ya°` � '� t,.'ij r i r !+� a .„ a , � � . . � . . � 1w ,z��° �r t . �, 'r r ri Y ��,�',� � �F > � ��`" , � t !i'ryr . �M �y�� .d� j:,ds ,��p-� x i;. � ..,�,y� ! �� 1� . i i�'� � �� 4 5 a"^ Y ;• qf.a - . ,� �'`' �-` % Jffi� 1 t� a s � ,,,,,. .. • • I 1 2 . : � : • � : 1 • � 1 � : / • • •' � � ' � (� ` •�� •'� :, � � 1� l 1 . � �.�i�� l. V�/� ^Y • � � � � � �/ � • . • . � a„ � �;�/ �^; , � � � (`�,� •..•• � ► , ,ltr; • , � ►+- . i I) ��. � • . .w: , SNEET � � � � ��.-, � _ ...._ . , {-' _ .,_... A .. ; .� � . �{ __ ...�....._�iC` '.. , .J µ. � � 1 i fC; `:r } � In � r �, � ._.R. ' �'' _ _ �ti . i �� ; � : ; --� _ �� : � � �,- : , ;_; t, �-� -�� i - - r ,..; _ .: �. .. : ; ; , _ . . _