The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD Application 5-30-14May 30, 2014 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting Engineering * Planning * Transportation * Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fm (727) 524-6090 Mr, Robert Tefft, Development Review Manager City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2 Ild Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: "The Bridge" at Arbor Shoreline Apartments 19321 US 19 North - Flexible Development Application Dear Mr. Tefft: Attached are the items necessary to process the above referenced Flexible Development Application for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment for apartments in the Office ("0") zoning district with Residential/Off ice General (R/OG) land use. 1. Flexible Development Application 2. Affidavit to Authorize Agent 3. Legal Description 4. Copy of Warranty Deed 5. Comprehensive Infill Criteria Responses 6. Narrative Summary 7. Comprehensive Landscape Program Application 8. Boundary Survey 9. Preliminary Site Plan 10. Landscape Plan 11. Building Elevations and Photos 12. Parking Assessment 11 3. Traffic Assessment 14. Stormwater Narrative 16. Arborist Tree Inventory Report dated April 19, 2014 16. Review Fee Check in the amount of $1,406.00 The project will consist of 236 new apartment units in three buildings. The existing office buildings on the eastern 15.77 acres will be removed however the offices on the western 6.75 acres will remain. We Kook forward to the upcoming DRC meeting on July 3, 2014. Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincer, ly, Robert Pergo Principal End. cc: Todd Fabbri, The Richman Group of Florida, Inc. File 14-010 o Planning & Development Department C learwater 0 Flexible Development Application o Attached Dwellings, Mixed -Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Golden Shoreline Ltd. , Partnership MAILING ADDRESS: 45 North 4th Street, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43215 PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Todd Fabbri - The Richman Group of Florida MAILING ADDRESS: 477 S. Rosemary Avenue, Suite 301, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PHONE NUMBER: 561 -832 -1114 EMAIL: Fabbrit @richmancapital.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 19321 US 19 N PARCEL NUMBER(S): 20129116101325100010010, 20/29/16/01325/000 /0020, 20/29/16/01325/000/0001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached Legal Description PROPOSED USE(S): Apartments (236 units), and existing office to remain DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Flexible development for redevelopment of 139,979 SF of office to 236 apartments, with 81,353 Specifically identify the request SF of office to remain. Flexibility to parking, height and setbacks in a Comprehensive Infill (include all requested code flexibility; Redevelopment application e.g., reduction in required number of parking spaces, height setbacks, lot size, lot width, specific use, etc.): Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33766, Tel: 727 - 562 -4567; Fax: 727 - 562 -4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01112 o LL L � � �� Planning & Development Department a Flexible pp Development Application p Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): Office (0) Residential / Office General (R/OG) Multiple office Buildings (218,332 SF) PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Attached Dwellings (236 units) proposed, 81,353 SF office to remain SITE AREA: 981,075 SF sq. ft. 22.52 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: 218,332 sf sq. ft, Proposed: 407,598 sf sq, ft. Maximum Allowable: 490,537 sq, ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First Ilse: 81,353 SF office to slay sq. ft. Second use: 326,245 sf, 236 apts. sq. ft. Third use: sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 218,332 SF (.22 FAR) Proposed: 407,598 (.42 FAR) Maximum Allowable: 490,537 SF (.50 FAR) BUILDING COVERAGE /FOOTPRINT (1" floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: 70,913 sq. ft. ( 7.23 % of site) Proposed: 119,269 sq. ft. ( 12.16 % of site) Maximum Permitted: sq. ft. ( % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: 70,055 sq. ft. ( 20.07 % of site) Proposed: 44,252 sq. ft. ( 15.9 % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 349,070 sq. ft. ( 35.5 % of site) Proposed: 278,977 sq. ft. ( 28.4 % of site) Planning & Developmont Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL. 33766, Tel: 727 -662 -4667; Fax: 727 -662 -4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01112 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of Impervious areas dIvIded by thototalsqoare footage of entire site); Existing: 0.61 Proposed: 0.48 Maximum Permitted: 0.76 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): Existing: NA Proposed: 236 du 1 .77 ao (I Glao) Maximum Permitted: 16 dulac OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 836 spaces Proposed: 694 spaces Minimum Required: 710 spaces BUILDING HEIGHT, rxisdng: 1-B story offlcos Proposed: 4 -scary apartments Moximum Permitted 30-feet (office zone) WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE Or THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? -- $37.8 Million ZONING DISTRICTS FOR AtLADIACeNT PROPERTY: North: MHP - Japanese Gardens MHP South: MHQR-8syCovo'_ Apartments East: Old Tampa Bay West; Off Ice (0) , Lincare and Commercial (013) across US19 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of representations made In this application are true and 2014'.—. to me and/or by accurate to the be f ,ly knowledge and authorize city represen a .v I it aid photograph the who Is personally known ties property describe I h, p on. produced as Identification. Signature of property owner of, representative Ofary public, My commission expires: 01) -31 to 011,9, Notary Public State of Florida W 0 pe ep 0 'ms-ion F� 04 44 ?2011 e6O7/3l?2017 Jesse wooppe, My Commission FF 041440 Expir or Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avonuck, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-662-4667; Fax: 727-602-4866 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01112 p Planning & Development Department Clearwater Flexible Development Application Site Plan Submittal Packaue Check list IN ADDITION. To THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND /OR PLANS: Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3- 914.A. The attached Flexible' Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.. A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor inciudi'ng the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures /improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s) -of -way within and adjacent to the site. Np, ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4- 202.A.5. PJA, LJ if this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks.. A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. Kr A. a Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development'is proposed to be constructed in phases. bg Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the ease Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. 10 Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on -site and off- site, with proposed points . of access. Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water limes, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. j4 Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. STORIVY PA��`Itrt�` NA 0 Location of off - street loading area, if required by Section 3 -1406. All adjacent rights) -of -way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727- 562 -4567; Fax: 727- 562 -4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01112 U Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. 0 Demolition plan. PQ identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. � ifadeviation from the parking standards b requested that is greater than 50% (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided, The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. SwEZ PA96v" Al6es:S**e)l7 A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying those trees proposed mbc removed, ifany. Atpee inventory, prepared by a certified orbohst of all trees four inches o$H or more that reflects the size, canopy, and comditinoof such trees may bcrequired if deemed applicable bystaff. Check with staff, A Traffic impact Study shall berequired for ail proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one ormore of the following conditions: '�ee—LFWR(- * Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 4080or more new trips per day; or * Anticipated new trip &wmmre*ion degrades the |e"c| of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; w/ � The study area contains auogmcnr of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, *r the segment and/or intersection exists onthe City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided bY the City of Clearwater Police Department; or � The Traffic Operations Manager wrtheir designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. � A landscape plan shall beprovided for any project where there isanew use orachange of use; ormoexisting use is improved or remodeled lna value o*25%ur more cf the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or J an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or o parking |o* requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information' if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approvak Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. N Existing trees on-site and immediately adjnccntwmthesite,byspedes,sbeand location, including drip line, interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as o percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking k« and vehicular use areas. -A Location of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, wails, fences, pools, patios, dmmnpomer pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility casements, treatment ofall ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed |omd»rapr. ocation of parkingareas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. 0 Drainage and retention anas,imdudimQswa|es,sideMope,andbmuom elevations. I!A Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning uDevelopment Department, 100n.Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page mwn Revised 01/12 o Planning & Development Department 0,.Clearwater t� Flexible pp Development Application p General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed development is consistent with surrounding development. The maximum height of 4 stories is similar to the ,5 and 6 story offices buildings in Arbor Shoreline and surrounding condos. It provides for residential use in close proximity to employment and provides significant open space in the site. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The redevelopment area comprises a 15.77 acre portion of a larger property that has offices. This will not impair their use. Adjacent uses are not significantly impacted. The apartments are a quieter use that is compatible with the offices and surrounding condos and MHP. Multi family uses are a "targeted" use in this area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The redevelopment of this property as an apartment complex will not impact the surrounding properties which are residential and offices buffered by existing landscaping and tree canopies. All surrounding property is currently residential, or offices that are partially vacant. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The 236 apartments will replace 136,979 SF of existing office space. Peak hour traffic will be substantially reduced by this redevelopment. See attached Traffic Assessment. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The apartment complex provides a new type of housing style which is encouraged in the US 19 Corridor Redevelopment Plan that encourages a variety of uses and higher densities. The community character is mixed -use. This residential development is in close proximity to offices and local businesses. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The apartments are a quiet use and are buffered from adjoining uses by landscape buffers and tree canopies. The placement of the trash compactor screens it from the general public driving on US 19 and adjoining residential uses. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727 - 662 -4567, Fax: 727 -562 -4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 o Planning & Development Department r Clearwater Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). 1. See Attached Narrative 2. See Attached Narrative .. See Attached Narrative 4, See Attached Narrative 5. See Attached Narrative 6. See Attached Narrative 7. See Attached Narrative 8, See Attached Narrative Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727- 562 -4567; Fax: 727 - 562.4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01112 Planning & Development Deparunent cama er Flexible Development Application '-C t Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative i. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names: Golden Shoreline Ltd. Partnership 2. That (I am/we are} the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property: 19321 US 19 N, Clearwater, rL 3, That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): Flexible Development Application to redevelop a portion of 22.52 acres With 236 apartments 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doe /do) appoint; Todd Fabbrl - The Richman Group of Florida, Inc. as (lass /their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5, That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property, G. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application; 7, That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is true and correct. Ctk�PEPM .9"114AN6 LJAL( Prop eary, ?0 r '50gi tl`jC' LrS keVti� ?-AM* f7 P rty Owner iii W-e Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF PbE;H%% COUNTY OF PRAIR&M a 115 -F VLA 4 V, 1, 01400 BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 1`16911410A. ON g4i' TI•11B A ' - DAY OF c9LO PERSONALLYAPPEARED �e V I M • S ffo 0 WHO HANANG BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN AND SAYS THAT HE /SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED, Barbara A. Schofield Notary Public, Slate of Ohio My Commission Expires 10-01-16 My Commission Expires: Planning illk Development Dopattment, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-407; Pax; 797-6624866 Page 8 of 8 Revised 31112 Description: (Per Title Commitment Customer Reference Number 25557 -0384 and First American Fast File Number 2037 - 3115020 issued by First American Title Insurance Company bearing an effective date of January 30, 2014 at 8:00 A.M.) Lot 1 , Lot 2 and Tract A, of the ARBOR SHORELINE subdivision, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Map Book 137, Page(s) 41 44, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 8925+144 DR7 1VPG0413 CI.I:Rfi OF CEr.CUIi rutty '1KLLA$- ,SIINV.r- SPECIAL M(t8AWr QL$b E* OCT I I Pti 4- It THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY WeD, made this III day of October, 19891 between PININVEST U.S. IEICORPORATrO, n Florida Corporation, Grantor, and (30LDEN SHORELINE LIMITED PAKNERSHIk, an Ohio limited partnership, Grantee, whose addrees is: 1225 Dublin Road, Columbus, Ohio 432151 Attns Mr, H. Hurkley Showe. UJTPZ§J8THs That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TER AND N01160 DOLLARS (,51V.UG) and other good and valuable caneideration to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of a, 1[1 ' t.t?��ct which are hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to itrc 5 Grantoa, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the »s yingwand beingiInd Pinellas County, ylarldn (to- wf,tanci ") situate, REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN ATTACHED HERETO AND HARE A PART HEREOF ktLY -- 7,tt2 $'� TOGETHER WITH all the tenements, horoditaments and eppurtenancas, with avert' Privilege, right, title, interest and ontats, reversion, remainder and oasoment thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that, subject to and except for ad valorem taxes and assessments f:vr the year 1989 and all subsequent yeatu, voning ordinances and land use regulations Imposed by governmental autkiority, and those certain matters described on Exhibit In, attached hereto and made a part heroof (019 "Permitted Exceptianuk), at the time of the delivery of thin Special Warranty bead, the Land was free from all encumbrances made by Grantor, and that, subject to and except for the Fermitted Egveptions, Grantor will warrant and defend the Land against the lawful claims and damands of all persons whomsoever lawfully claiming by, through or under the Grantor horein, but against bone other, IN WITNESS WHEREOI', Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. (n,2aled and sl v aC FININVEST U.S. INCORPORAfiFD, ea nC a a Florida corporation By. Fritz 8. Scharenberg President As to Grantor pp � Taw P11. d aU_1; L [FanimenWrY 1--11, Ti% Pd. G - - - -' ....— — —"•3v •1.p r..alY Kai l :cn r tHIS II15TRONEHY PREPARED BY. Ted R, TAroarga, Esquire Trenhla, Sianwns, Kem"r. Scharf, _..__. v, mac• 8arlia, Frye S O'Reill, P.A, ....... P. B. boa 1102 Tampa, Florida 33601 Description. pinellas,YL Document - Book.Vagc 7207.413 Page. ,I of e.. Order. •rb Cbmment: t ON7107PG0414 STATE; OF COUZaPif OF M9& 0 The foregoing instruMent Waa acknowledged before me this+ CP� day of October, 1909, by Fritz E. SCharenburg, ao President of F'ININVEST U.S. INCORPORATBDr a Florida corporation, an behalf of said corporation. Notary Public (NolrARIAL 'SEAL) ray calnnliasion expirQa: i' q{Cigfy t'abite, elite o, pietWs et LOT90 �• ' • ya Y Commif� ton 000, 21ov. (.101 anndxl Ibru pgont'a ryutJAY flto%trab4 t' Tha "foilaxiog informatign -is provided pttrvuant to Vlorl4d Statute Section 699,02 {2), Proparty App>:Aieer's parcel. IDIi Snaial eacurity number of Grantee named in deed: _2.. pescriptJoix; pinelIaa,PL Dovamom; - Book.Fage 7107.413 Page. 2 of 5 Order. rb CommanC: x c DR7107PGO415 KX—f LE GE 11I, OGSC iPT1 N HASE_ I - „ARBOR OFPFS'� VOW— The Eantarly 700.00 feet of the Westerly 800.00 feet of the Southerly 420.0 feet ok the Northerly 825.00 fsot Of iiovernment Lot 2, in Section 20, Township 29 South, Rnnge 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as followas From the Hest 1/4 CRrner of said Section 20, -run South 09 °29 13, taut along the South boundary of said Government Lot 2 in Section 20 a distance of 14040 feet to a point on the Easterly right -of -way line of U.S. Highway Routs No. 19 (Stilts Road No. 55); xun thence North 00952,25" E4st along Raid Easterly right- of -wrsy line, parallel to and 100.00 feet Easterly of the West boundary or said Government Lot 2, a dintnnce of 5lS feet, more or less, to a point which in 825.00 feet Southerly of the North boundary of said Government Lot 2, for a point of- beginnings From Raid point- of- hogInning, continue North 00152125` East along said Easterly right -of -way line of U. S. Highway Route Ro. 19 a diBtance of 420 feet td a paint which is 4(15,00 feet Southerly of said North boundary of Government Lot 2, run thence S. 09 °13112" $aat parallel to and M AU feet Southerly of said North boundary of Government Lot 2, a distance of 700.00 feet, run thence south 00 052,25° West a distance of 420.00 Feet; run thence North 99 °13112" west, pnrallol to aid 825.00 feet Southerly of raid North boundary of Government Lot 2, a distance of 700.60 feet to the paint -of- beginning. LECt14L GESCRIPTiON KA5E 11 - AR,BQR OFFICE CENTER F RC,Ej,.. NU... 7 Beginning on the boy at the Northeast corner of Lot 2 and running West on the United States Subdivision line to the section Line, thence south clown the section line 135,00 yards, thence Haut parallel to the United States Subdivision line to the old Tampa Bay, thence along the bay at the high water mark to Place of Beginning, being in Iot 2, Section. 20, TownRhip 29 South, Range 16 East, containing 15 acres more or leas, leas the went 100.00 feet thereof for right -of -way tor Bighway V.S. 19, PARICn L.,N_0,L,_8 Beginning at the Northwest corner of Government Lot 2 In Section 20, Townpillp 29 South, Range 11; @anL, running thence South 405.00 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Lot 2, 805.00 feet to a Point of Beginning) thence running South 420.00 feet, thence East purrnilel with the North line 400.00 feet, thence N. 220 W.r 453.00 feet; thence Want 231,00 feet to a Point of Beginning. PARCEL NQ. 10 All land, aubmerged land and riparian rights formerly included in Plat of Taylor and 111anton "s 8ubdivioion, recorded in Plot Book one (1J, Page sixteen (16) of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County wan formerly a part, which lies South of the middle line of "De Soto Avenue, au shown on Raid plat, and its Sesterly extenaJon to navigable water in Tampa Bay; lens part of the foregoing described ass uue inning at the Northwest Corner of Cover InlluilL [,Qt 2, in Section 2U, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, .running thence South 405.00 feet; thence East, parallel with the North line of aaid Lot 2, 005.00 feet to a Point of Beginiiingi thence running South 420.00 feet; thence East parallel with the North line Deacription: Plnellaja,PT, Document - Book -Page 7107.413 Page: 3 of 6 order: rb Comment: DR7I07PG0416 400.00 feet; thence H. 2213 yr,, 453.00 felt; thonea WGU t 231.00 foot 1 to a point of Beginning. LESS AND RXCCPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PRBMISESr From the Horthwast corner of Government Lot 2, the mama being the Z;orthwomt corner of the Southwoat 114 of tho northwest 114 of Suation 20, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Mallon County, Flbrfdu as a Point of Reference; thence S. 89013112" t:., along the north line of said I,At, 100.00 feet to art interaection with the Basterly right- of-way line of U, S. Highway 19 (State Road 055, R 200,00 foot right - of -way) to the Point-of Beginning; thence continue S. B9 "13'12" E., along entd 11 n 830,60 foot; thence .leaving anld line S, 00°52125' W., 825.00 feet to the South line of Taylor and 02antonla Subdivision as reaor4ed in Flat Book 1, page 16, Public Ret:o:rds of nilluborough County, Florida of wbich Plnollav County woe fo=wrly a park; thence along the boundary of said plat by the following throe (3) courspst 1. N. B9 013'12" W., 134.60 feet; 2. N. 00 °52,251, S., b20.00 feet; 3. N, 09 013,12" W., 104.00 fontf to an Intersection with the aforentonrioned right- of -wny lino of U.S. iiighway 19; thnnce N. 00052,251, S•, along said line 405.00 teat to the above- mentioned Point of Beginning. Together wJt.h a certain Easement for egreaa according to inatrument by and between John Hancock Mutual Trite Insu:rancs CoMpany and Pininveat .America Corporation recorded April 25, 1965 lit Official Records Book 5978, Page 1750, public Recorde of Pinellas County, Florida, as amended by Addendum to Easement recorded June 10, 1905 in Official Record book 5009, Page 1041, in said records. i Descriptiob: PineTla&,FL Dperunegt - Zook.Page 7107.413 Page: 4 of 6 Order: rb Comment: id ,�Itlil'PTE TI � L•`X EP X NS P"hSRS I AND 11 1. Any encroachments, saeements or other mattero depicted on that purvey prepared by George F. Young, Inc., dated September 23, 1909, Project No. B9 -13- 0661 -00, 1~avlaed October 9, 1ga9• 2. Water main Basement recorded in Deed Book 1465, page 184, granted to Pinellas Water Co., a Florida corporation, by Katle Rlkgore, recorded on Februaxy 3, 1954, being a perpetual easement 50 feat wide to construct, operate and maintain water mu3,ne for distr.ibutlan or water (uesignment to City of St, peterabnrg, by Assignment recorded on February 3, 1954, in Deed Book 1465, page 109) Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. Vaecment recorded in Deed Book 1465, page 197, rjrAnted to Pinellas Water Co., a Florida corporaltion, by Mazy F. Kilgore, Ernest Kilgore, Claire Kilgore, Winnie Kilgore, and W. R. Kil.go>ro, recorded on February 31 1954, being a perpetual eaaaemont 5o feat wide to conatruct, oporate and maintain water maLne for distribution of water (4ssignment Co City of St., Petaraburg, by Assignment recorded on February 3, 1954, in deed Book 14 65, page 203204) Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 4. Sanitary sewer easement In favor of the City of C)earwal_ar, recorded In Deed Book 1675, page 292, and recorded May 9, 1963, Public Records Of Plrsellae County, Fl*Vid$. 5. Utility and drainage easement in favor of The City of Clearwater, an recorded on November 22, 1971, In official Records Book 9657, page goo, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, 6, Access Road Easema3nt in favor of The City of Clearwater, as recorded on November 22, 1971, in Official Rocorde Book 3567, page 989, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 7. Easoment in favor of Florida power Corporation as recorded on February 5, 1974, In Official Records Book 4132, page 1704, public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. a. Basement In favor of Florida Power Corporation as recorded on July 8, 1974, in official. Records hook 4192, page 1211, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 9, Distribution 150sement in favor of Florida Power Corporation, as recorded on December 23, 1980, in Official Records Hook 5126, page 270, public Records of PlAellaa county, Florida. 10. Grunt of Fasement by and between W.R.C. Properties, Inc., A Delaware corporation, and Tile City of Clearwater, for the purpose of ingress and egress as recorded on January 21, 1961, In Official Itecords Book 5139, page 482, public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 11. I-,ant of easement by and between W.R.C. Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and The City of Clearwater, for the purpose of waterlineo and related facilities as recorded on January 21, 1881, in offtaial Records Book 5138, page 489, Public Records of Pinellas County, 1110271d"- 12. Grant of Easement by and between W.R.C. properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and The City of Clearwater, for tale pasrPoge of water, sewer, drainage and utilities as recorded on January 21, 191.31, In official Aecorde Book 51313, page 493, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, Description: PtneIlas,FL n6cuMkdt - Beok.Page 7107.413 :Page; 5 of 6 Order: rb Ccmml-at: i .' 0R7 107PG04 18 13. Grant of easement by and beCwaeu Fininvent U.S, Xncorporatecl and John VancoGk Mutual Life Ynaurance Company recorded in offi.cia,1 Records Book 5978, P$go 1750, an amended in Offlaial Records Book 6009, Page 1041, Public RacortlA of Pinellas County, Florida. Page 2 of 2 DenorlPtiOn; pinellaS,FL DGGuML -x2L - Rook.Page 7107.413 Page: S of b, Order: rb Comment. � COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT Project Criteria The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The Office (0) zoning district does not list attached dwellings as a permitted use except as a Comprehensive Infill redevelopment project. In keeping with the goals of the US 19 Corridor Redevelopment Plan, attached dwellings are a preferred use in this area. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The redevelopment from office to attached dwellings is consistent with the US 19 Corridor Redevelopment Plan which seeks to encourage higher density residential development. The residential apartments will he in close proximity to employment opportunities and retail centers. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The re -use of this site will not impede development or redevelopment of surrounding property. All surrounding property is currently developed with residential or office uses. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The re -use of this property as an apartment complex is compatible with adjacent land uses. All surrounding property is currently developed with residential or office uses. In addition, the apartment use is appropriate on the waterfront of Old Tampa Bay provides a transition between the more intense offices directly abutting US 19 and bay to the east. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor Page 1 of 3 d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in spot land use or zoning designation; f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use a. The proposed re -use as an apartment complex is a permitted use in the underlying R/OG land use category. The R/OG category allows a maximum density of 15 units /acre. The redevelopment will generally follow the bulk regulations for the MDR zoning district. b. The proposed apartment complete use would contribute to the local economy by providing temporary construction jobs and a few permanent jobs once completed. C. NA d. The reuse does not involve affordable housing. e. The area is characterized by predominantly residential and office uses. The re -use as an apartment complex is consistent with the underlying R/OG land use and a land use plan amendment is not needed. The re -use as an apartment complex is compatible with the Bay Cove apartments to the south and mobile home park to the north and would provide a transition between the office uses on US 19 and the bay to the east. f. The project does not involve working waterfront uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height, and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale, and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: Changes in horizontal building planes Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc. Variety of materials and colors Distinctive fenestration patterns Building stepbacks; and Distinctive roof forms Page 2 of 3 e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhances landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. a. The reuse of this building as an apartment complex will not impede the development of surrounding properties since they are mostly already developed with residential or office uses in the "O" zoning district or MHDR or MHP zoning district. b. NA C. The height of the buildings is limited to 4- stories and is similar to the heights of the adjacent office buildings and apartments to the south. The buildings are larger than many apartment buildings and are arranged to take advantage of open water views of Old Tampa Bay. This arrangement supports a density of 15 units /acre which is the maximum currently permitted in the R/OG land use category. d. The proposed architectural character for the development is envisioned to reflect a contemporary nautical theme to foster a close connection with the setting along Old Tampa Bay. Most notable is the stepped arrangement of the units facing the water, providing movement and interest to the elevations while maximizing water views for the residents. In keeping with a nautical feel of the project, materials are proposed to consist of primarily stucco finishes in light /white tones paired with accents of deep wood -tone siding that create contrast and texture. Openness and connection with the water are the most prominent themes. Beyond the light tones of the main building mass, heavy emphasis on glazing, as well as aluminum and glass rails, help to provide an open connection between the building interior and site /waterfront setting. Balconies are an important element of all of the unit types, lending to interesting shadow lines and movement of the elevations and expanding indoor /outdoor living opportunities for residents. Flat roofs are envisioned to conceal HVAC and other building functional elements, and to increase open space for landscape and vegetation around the building base and throughout the site. e. The site will be upgraded with significant landscape features, reduced impervious surface, greater green space, and the project includes preservation of many existing trees. Page 3 of 3 THE "BRIDGE" AT ARBOR SHORELINE APARTMENTS NARRATIVE OWNERS: GOLDEN SHORELINE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 45 North 4th Street, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43215 APPLICANT /AGENT: RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA 477 S. Rosemary Avenue, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PLANNING /ENGINEERING CONSULTANT GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. 13825 ICOT Blvd., Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 The applicant is proposing to partially redevelop the Arbor Shoreline Office Park, by redeveloping the easternmost 15.77 acres with a 236 unit apartment complex on property within the Residential /Office General (R /OG) Land Use Category in the Office (0) zoning District in Clearwater. The site is also located in the area covered by the US 19 Corridor Redevelopment Plan. The subject properties comprise 22.52 acres under common ownership. They are currently developed with 218,332 square feet of office space in multiple buildings within Arbor Shoreline. The R /OG category permits a density of 15 units /acre, therefore, the eastern 15.77 acres can be developed with 236 apartments, and the western 6.75 acres that is currently developed with 81,353 square feet of office space can remain as is, and it is still below the allowable floor - area -ratio of 0.50. Therefore, the total project would consist of 236 apartments and 81,353 square feet of existing office space to remain. This will form a mixed -use development that is encouraged in the US 19 Corridor Redevelopment Plan. The apartments will complement the existing offices and residential uses in the area and are in close proximity to employment opportunities and local retail businesses. The removal of 136,979 square feet of office space to accommodate the apartments will also reduce peak hour traffic generation. The redevelopment of the eastern portion of the site will result in a reduction of impervious surface and an increase in green space. Different housing styles and densities are encouraged, and this project will provide a new type of housing style (4 -story rental apartments) and at a higher density than many surrounding residential uses. v /LLry mater 0 Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW/ BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW! COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IF NECESSARY, WALL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES), PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Golden Shoreline Ltd., Partnership MAILING ADDRESS: 45 North 4th Street, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43215 PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE; Mr. Todd Fabbri - The Richman Group of Florida MAILING ADDRESS: 477 S. Rosemary Avenue, Suite 301, West Palm. Beach, FL 33401 PHONE NUMBER: 561 -832 -11.14 EMAIL: Fabbritm @richmancapital.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 19321 US 19 N DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Per the adjacent property owner's request, we ask for a variance to the City buffer requirements Specifically identify the request along the 203' length of property boundary on the east side of the site to eliminate the 1 tree (include all requested code flexibility; per 35' and shrub buffer requirement. Large existing trees provide canopy coverage and separa- e.g., reduction In required number of parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot Lion between the two parcels. size, lot width, specific muse, etc.): 1, the undersigned, representations mat n accurate to the b old City repres property de: Signature of pro STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ° j I acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of is application are true and ncawlbdge and authorize p tome and /or by ` nd photograph the wl ��r r y i i�"/r eu , who is yersonally know9_bas I or representative ary public, v commission expires: 13) 1Z) d as identification. Notary Public State t�f Florida & ail �pm3partment, 0 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727" - 562 -4567; Fax: 727 - 562-4865 t'14yCommissa�rn FF 04944p Revised 0'1/12 EXpireS 07/31/2017 o Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL. 2. Architectural Theme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and /or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. While the initial plans show a code level design, it is the intent to provide enhanced landscape plans which exceed the amount required by the City code minimum standards. Trees and vertical plant material will accent the architecture, with additional shrubs and groundcover and upsized tree sizes to create an overall lush and welcoming experience. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Accent lighting will be tied to a timer to control the length of time the lights are illuminated. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. All plant material will be appropriate to the climate conditions of Clearwater and the site, and will complement the existing trees /vegetation on the property. 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Perimeter landscape treatments and entry corridor landscape will frame views of the parcel, enhancing the architectural elements and directing views into and around the property. Plant material shown in the future enhanced landscape plans will exceed the code requirements of the City. S. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. All plant material shall meet the code requirements for the City of Clearwater. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727 -662 -4567; Fax: 727 -562 -4865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01112 N- RECARDNO SCHECU1t Ba [I:CEP:IONS (Pm DIN 0. tmen c rimer IRAN-- Numl,NNC, tn.u,ene. e p y 5 ee =llee Nr. eo4 0l J n n So� yvl +lI, W v0.N1)1 Am mn s 4pe111LZI:e9e Mr ttimmp �19rmenlrinrlawer of Ina tyeem 51�yt'a4roDUtl9 �nFImM �emwn en iN. q sy. rA, t, 01 T) ',R;Empetne, .1 I, c[e'Snmemtil stn raven o. the my r SI Pwlemlw,�GeFwlweeln aNCwn cn the RY. rM In LI, 1 In Booty I4iB, EPOgR 29R la eaM1Ow. on !ne ourrcyLlL O q 106.. AO wLO[ 2 ontl 1-: A,mo,aetl November 22. I19ilmin OcoS e3L4'1. Pogee9&Jelc euwwn rn iM1e eumY� (N EVIL; 13- CGea Aar tt Ix 1 W the ON, If Claarxcter, Fl ES, ,,carded Nwe 1 22. 1971 In Booty 5661, -o ME Io mown an me oNmy. (AO to Lot I) 14. Eam.en: M al ToAIN Power OoivaMlr n cAOM Fcbrvory 5. 1973 ;n Bock 41 J2. Page 1 i0e A ohown on me aNrvy. (u m Lo[ I, . 15. EopN.nem ;n lover of Tolled Power COnorollrn -11. Jury 8, I974 le Booty IN% Pogw 16!IONA. I, f4rerl of q- Pere, yCarxrallee ra a Decsmeer 23, :480 1, 8- 512& qe 27O le blee'ul Ic .clue.. (Ae m Wt 2 em tteeeOI) 11 21, ( ]e Jon ry t, 199 In mou 11M olth� •9, Eeeemenx Ic I-1 m .ne DILy A CIS, w er 31, 19E1 :e Naek TIM. Page 4fl9. (AI, ro Lot 2) 19, Woler. Saner. Orvin ge o c Vlll;ly Ecxment ;n rove, of the GIy of -- -. ri- re - Joxuoy xl, 19a1 IA F sl]B, P4ge A9] la eN4wo an m. our,or. (Aa to ben 2 4ea ]) 20. Ingrcoa Egreao 1,1 VBIIty Exonont ARrooment by ono Mlwoen FIE- VS. Incomorclod -1 ,olden E, Rne Umltetl PI, ""I, recd d Orteba. 11. 1949 11 Boot 7107. Peg, All 1, eMwn an me oorvcy. (A. to Lo[c 1 -1 R) 2C1.D radon .1 FIR en6 CeRnt e! Exuma Gta r eeMetl. ROlamaper 23, 1999 ;* BF11 .6", tc e". onm1l uteM1e a ...... wnGtlo. ealercllrno 11- i2 It- 3404('), OrceeuM1Own ee INN NtCA..e Leta 1 e.a _ e.a T1e A)r SC, kaaHl>Uena, a aOleca, , uAntrc x me pct o1 ARIWR EHOREJn[�ae eped•d ;. Flo[ Se., 137, Fase(slnA ur bu'1tdeletEeq aeY nntlYlem9o�dl..NCtbna vl�MC'se 43NVSC t3L04(e)�eWleconellllene am aM1WOwnrt(Atc11a All ePOrcol9)eee., 25. OocwraIII a• CS-, -i.e Path., A reeerae4 F ,-, 1:, "'I In Booty "TO. q 9qa Ie mew, w the eu y. (A A 1nt 1) Subleel to LNlm e ! n G[L lc C Lo EeeN nx Id (R, S Sc al INSoWHrnw(ea) c w11 71.l In 1,56E, 25. E...Rment eD formy of %1oNtloeLOa Tn mlco;on C H, n dac ee e: IoXM1 oM tlw -.d In Mot .1 11. Order al TSI ontl FlIe 3N 1-1 rve- Noy 1. 2019 le - IL90B, Poge t 59i Ia own on Inv au- (AC w Lot 1) 26, The ,my la sehjecr 1a the Oeclorotlan of Ca[.Aenw IN E -1.11w Iecalo.e Sa >[emeer 12. 201 1 In E- 1]351. r Pogo 1951, but tlelm;n9 oeyee rsnont. ntlAlo+ or reolrinwn InCieoling a prel.renee. Ilml!Rtlo. a dlxamleollP+ booed on eebr, rellglen. x., ha.•tlleap. Iem11IoI etpte� .r (< 1el Al P W [ne .gent eueH eeve,nnp, •cendllem er metNCenne dslNee 12 4$C 366A(c). (ho re l Rernla} Les4nd: rrN Ppnur.NU1 P fA> ur ®gton � wcc wruiwr �oR 0.N rm ,vxr a Tye,xy t. IcN�wP` [n nop VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Description; eve. Mlle corn meat �elcmcr 1111 FIA NNNmflbr 2oOi�]1� ..e =a_ by nmr -.-I, Roe leeu 11 uct Ina MEON NHOREUrye e aoI in eceraatl Ie Hop Dack 137E Fogp(a) 41-A4. of - PNNY RecorcL .1 t•:nella. O-,v, Florltlo. LOT AREAS: ,CT 1 CONTAINS 5.75 ACRES MERE OR LEES LO1 2 CCNIAINS 14.75 PORES MORE OR LWS TRACT W C.O- 1,84] 60UAFE FEET MORE CA LESS SurveyBRs NOles: w APr�r.4:o N.OEHC,r r,`c'`FAHleir PcwcixE "PCRDE alp $�oMN "I"'S iaeRUAEL'FLH' 2GNE5 X L'NS�POCC��' ENICEB. AC (EL 9 NN() PNB YE' (EL 0 -D) T[C FMDONE 0. THE THE +PPRO>TWTE RD,O ton F TRANEIItON IF ean.'cAa •-N 3 Css�evw Vs stnA`rvE N-1 FEPRESENOS n �CTLR.,-71ON on AlE MERP-HENTIES Amu OF NOT FEpCO. LAND VIEW TIE DOUNOARfES OF THIS SURVEY MAY OR NAY NOT BE n 5U4 ECT 'O N.DDDINL: THE BUILpl1w' DEPARTMENT OR OTHER CUST0- AGENCY CR Flpoo CVERRIaAI LION WCIMIN TIC NVNIC-D)l WY HAYS A19CITICNAL 1+FO N ,.. iRND AND FE51N1,70N5 ON DVXLq.ENT. 1) SGIM SHOWN NEREOry ARE BASED ON THE NOR7, BCN'NCARY OF A: 2 -NO A BORING OF 5 D-OS E, 2) N HERI Aq eASW ON PINELG�S GOVAN 9LNO!MPRH 'CAUPVSTG HAVING A PyL HEO EJNATICN CF 6.20 NAWBS. PRC - TV Y ISAYM�MI Bc FgNO£IHrtsHANy_C R'CO D& 0 °mss CCD- A) NOT NT PROP {Rix OWNERS OR - 111INCHPROPERIY RECORDING NEC-N! n PI-A VtYON E) 1E 1U -1 E. MACE NO INNESTGTCN CR I.SEOENDEN1 SEARCH 1. _NlS OF FWDRO. ENCUMBMNOE3, RESTS- COVENANTS, DVNEPEHIR TIr:E rz FAC1s 4) THE -ND- CORNERS AND MNES OE>ICTEO BD iH15 SOWES wFR5 ESTA9LISNED PER INFORWTCN AS NR-EC, 7) UNLESS - ERNMSE SHO'xn HEREON, N0 JUBISOI-- VIEILnNO AN- OR OTTER PFR'RDAL TOPOGRAPHIC FEKTMRES HAVE DZEN LOCATED. 9) V HME14:S, EVCH P5 IJ'1LITC5, SIRULT'3a[5, INSTA',1TION5, NDERCRDUAN -FOR-.. THAT lanr eNZ:, Hour Nm Rr_=N nE1.D LOWTW EIDEPI AS SH,-. 9) THIS W DOES N07 DEIERMI.I•E CA REFLECT OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTT. pCNNeiDa UNES t.FFEGTED BY AONERSE USE UNEE OF MNFUDOINC 0EEC5. OR DET uN6 THAT WY OTHERWISE BE CCrCRIpNW BY P CG:RT OF IAIV, 16) UMDEROROVND UTV1 LOGTCNG AND IOERIFOnnONS SHORN HEREON ARE DASED UPON VISIBLE ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCES ANO DO NO: ECESSnx:LY SHOW ALL VIILItt LOCATIONS. NO SUBTERRANEAN EXCAVATION HAE BEEN (NICE TO DETERMI NE uN3ERCn,nNO Lmun >.cu-IDNS. :I) THE MOSMRED NAIHEH :CAL CLOSURE Of THE SVxv . DS THE ACCIIPACY STANCARCS FOR AN LI CLASS SURVEY AS nn,JED BD TEED AMERICAN CONGRESS ON EVRVEY[HO AND -PINC ANC T,E AMEPoGN LADD TITLE 123 TEE TES FROM DVTO RE CCRNCRS, FCNX;E COMERS, TES. CORNERS, ETC., 0.4E NOT TO 3E 1 O i0 REESOABUSN PROP£RTi BOVNOR -E THE SICK NO PARTY OR PARTIES SUPRONIBIYFB gLOOT Y,NITaN CINNCERT Os THEN SIGY:NG PANTY OR PARTIES. ITSTHIS sLII HIS SEEN PREPARED exPRESSLELFOR THEE NNW o IDES Nn NCT TRANSFERABLE. NO GIxFH PSRSON ON IS E R- u EPFOE ARIRIFTNEENXC IS NSG'11O Ij TCN ENN IINPLTRINLEkWSVRV_YINC AND THE THE P rE95ICxAL $"'EVOR AND ER, 15) NOTHING HEREN E- BE CONSIRVEO YO 115 AND RIGHTS OR BENEf".IS TO -ONE _ER TH. THOSE CERIE. TO ON T IG BGRVEY, 1fi} FENCE CANFRSHIP NOT OEI[Ia1INCM. t om) PRtIU ED CNefNSIOAIS eHOWN ON TrE HPP OF SVNN'EY SUPgRS£➢E SCALED ENSICE CSHEIR LO "I" '- DI Or -5 T-0 :. PPNICALLY SHOW 18) REPRCOUCTON OF OHS SURJEY E -AIS- FORBIOOEN W..UT THE WRTIEN PCRMISSICN FROM - 5iNING EL-OR. 19) THE WORD 'CEAR ISO" IS MNOERSm00 TO EE a EXP-RN OF THE IROFE5F10NAL $IL VEAM-5 OPINION BI ED ON HIS BEST I1NOwIEOCE INFORMA'ION wARC .'h',FO:HER LaPRESSE7 OnOIMVUEDts NIOTHER A IVeem11EE NOR A 20) T115 SURVEY 15 A RENEEENTNCF N OF EXISTING RELD CONEI11- T THE TIME Or HETH uDELD ALIR'! DP E AND 15 ILlSW CN FOUND 9GSTN, MONUN.ENTATOY IN Rt) 1H IREE5 5-- HEREON WERE LOCATW -IND NEINODS fIIEQ- FOR AND iDENrd TON. HOARZVER. TNIS OON W AND THE INES THE NIGHT 10 vENTI THE LOCATON OF ALL :BEES ONNI ING To THE DERIONN o: exy 61XER PERWN[NT FFATVR[S 'f IS iHF RFSPrslslalvn OF THwDESCN IOrvAE TO INFDNM THIS CCMn0.lY -R /OR STONING 5 OF AIY IREES CRRICAL TO THER DESIGN SIT Tint CONN BE R2) nLL ROUND EvNATCNS MERTO SE COPNtIb NT" TON THE NEARCESTI ONE TENTH OF AFOOT. 2]) THE OATE OF SIGNMORE DDES NOT UPDATE OR 5UP-E THE DATE OF slnry CONRIGHT 20)4 - HANL70N EvGNNEERINC c SURN CNC, INC. RE,I+13 -D TO CORRECT YFICIAL RECORDS BOOK NUMBER APRIL 29, 2014 REVISED TO ADO UNDER6ROUh0 UTII ^^APRIL, 23, 2DIa HrY9T} F s^ Ln l() o 7 24 a' W Y° � ?W Li r p n Z Z =vim Z) 0 rn O O dm U O }� 0 -0�3. o ._ = EL w �_ CL - - — - — - — --- - — - — --- - U.S. HIGHWAY 19 (STATE ROAD 56) — - — - "- - -- -'- 200 RK31iT OF WAY -F�77 G' k\' -.2---- 71 o V -2 IIhiR H" 'MIA "NO) FF- F- lei - — - - - - - - - - - 1 II I 21 �Z 2 NOT INCLUOro J, - - .----- - - -' -- - ; lZ I qj SEE S14EET 3 j MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY 0 ARBOR SHORELINE q U.S. HIGHWAY 19 (STATE ROAD 55) ENG[NEEnING & SURVEYING. INC, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA q pp Ir Ji OLD TAMPA BAY SEE SHEET 2 ------------------- NOT INCLUDED }Ic =1 l, (X1 °,mac T-flm :" riff q pp Ir Ji OLD TAMPA BAY I 194 MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY ARBOR SHORELINE U.S. HIGHWAY 19 (STATE ROAD 55) PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA m Q qtr RAMILTION ENGINEERING & SUnVEYING, INC. }Ic =1 l, °,mac T-flm :" riff I 194 MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY ARBOR SHORELINE U.S. HIGHWAY 19 (STATE ROAD 55) PINELLAS COUNTY. FLORIDA m Q qtr RAMILTION ENGINEERING & SUnVEYING, INC. T= Logmd .4. 7 7 - - - - - - - - - - "sr & ,7 17 1�1� ilp§ LQ7' 3 IL „Jv 2 ?1 41 ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE NAVD 1988 NOTE: FOR S% R.' AND INVERTS SEE SHEET =� In Lo q Ix Z) 0 win Z LLJ L X z Ln Z) O m of LL 0 cc a- < < z E CL V) C:) NOTE: FOR S% R.' AND INVERTS SEE SHEET =� nisi eOUElwir of= —4 20-29-16 LLS. HIGHWAY 19 (SPATE ROAD 55) 200' RIGHT OF WAY �r— I -T 7 A PR —1 L --vT rfl I- M I IN I'J.. I hi - L 1 1�y SEE SHEET 3 " N�j'§41`a MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY 0 �-"L; 14AMILTON q 19 -1 ARBOR SHORELINE 2 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 (STATE ROAD 55) ENGIur.ERING & SuRVEYffiG. INC. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SEE SHEET 2 NOT INCLUDED N� � lh� 'Z � - Ij F� €� �5k t � ,' Vii �"� � i �/ i��JJJ � � 3 }' k iN z z P Fr] FFJ z z > Z < <1 A I F OLD TAMPA BAY LL MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY O AMILTON ARBOR SHORELINE I-. K N U.S. HIGHWAY 19 (STATE ROAD 55) F GEHEERJNG A SURVEYING. INC. Elm- PINELLAS COUNlY, FLORIDA THE BRIDGE @ARBOR SHORELINE APARTMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION Description: (Per Title Cammilmert Customer Relerence N— er 25557 -0384 and Rm A —Been Fast File Number 2037- 3t15020 iu and by Fri Amorican Title Insuronc. Company Soaring an effaotiv date of January 30, 2014 at 8:00 11.M_) Let " Let 2 and Troc: A, el the ARBOR SHORELINE subdivision. oeonrdin9 :o the plat thereat a ecorded .n MaP Book 137, Paga(s) 41 -44, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Fla11d9. PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS SECTION 32 TOWNSHIP 28 S, RANGE 16 E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC. 477 South Rosemary Ave, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 632 -1114 P4�,�rr:Y niRFf.Yf4RY DRAWENG INDEX SHEET 1171,E_ C1 COVER SKEET C2 EXISTING CONOTIONS /DEMOLITION PLAN C3 OVERALL 517E PLAN C4 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION Description: (Per Title Cammilmert Customer Relerence N— er 25557 -0384 and Rm A —Been Fast File Number 2037- 3t15020 iu and by Fri Amorican Title Insuronc. Company Soaring an effaotiv date of January 30, 2014 at 8:00 11.M_) Let " Let 2 and Troc: A, el the ARBOR SHORELINE subdivision. oeonrdin9 :o the plat thereat a ecorded .n MaP Book 137, Paga(s) 41 -44, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Fla11d9. PRELIMINARY SITE PLANS SECTION 32 TOWNSHIP 28 S, RANGE 16 E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC. 477 South Rosemary Ave, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 632 -1114 P4�,�rr:Y niRFf.Yf4RY COIpEN SHCRELWE LTD PARTNERSHIP 45 WAIN STREET. SUITE 209 --p It 1 Gulf Coast Consulting, r, �C. b c. DEVELOPER: COLUMBUS. CH 43215 RICHMAN CROUP CF FLCMDA INC Lsnd ABY81opTHant Co- snitins ® ,, ENG4YMING TWWORTATtON PLANMG M BIl171A'G 477 Sl1V7F R05LM4RY AVENUE. SLATE 301 I ? � iii - ``. 13825 ICOT HLVD.. BIInE 603 NEST PALM DEACIi, EL 5:401 ,yam. �� -,`�{ - _' ClanvaleF, Florida 97766 CIVIL "GHEER: GOLF CDAST eoNSULT C, INC PJK-T (777)n4-IM F— X?)324,M 13825 ICDf 0 LEVARC SUITE. 605 C4EARWATER, FL 33]C9 WWW_gTLtYCDABtCOnsultingi Fcxom ! � 4 � \ ♦ S � � % a,ln �rrwr y c� ➢Pi� � � - - — LI L ^"R.'�L/"f rr,'a'J'��u 5 E9'T ¢S" E 9, Y.61Q') 1ffFEnETJ��EAW,6 l � S � V! � i " L�,y,�` � Au. pJSnRCOWGrttlnLlg6i51bll6P Wfu,O wsPFO PRIMYO L�ErMIlIIOII IWP P..._�.. WPb ]PIrR1FP5PPFJ¢'f3uRnWLFFOUIiaIl S d2 E 183.74'(F �% FurZS 'SIwuR[n�5luuaEPF¢tcelmwwrm P]fwun¢M1 _ — ..-_ — atra,m rul,+mr 'D' • � � J / �' .«.u, n � �� i pnuoulmRrr lRUn¢] eu�uricPmneeuneRRUPfwucPmonlLSUnun <ucTentCRe Y� ." or,n Inv) K P- wrv".,.., i �. \ i1P4 RY ..� �WAIRRLL][ 115. DW&[ AE tt414RLMt% INUPMdRWNPAflRIiRR6AREPN fIYPRiihR 9 � jk` [. P�WCO [�C� - !/ •4`��r""��'+^T "��'� Lf{YOFSLGRYp.TER 1NF p1YiN44 PArJWFNiPBEA1n1MFS9 Pix¢ - _ , T6 0E PE�OVLP f*ml" ''r "' . �'. B (• a p "n o W rP Y� rra...•r t OAIPM1INDIP_ o�•��, �..i.G"i..LdP�..•L .r114 f FtEVAiIMELL¢ SFllCNNN91A1CGltliIYB :NLHWAR'GA1PLL5(CNANM3APJYL19NE9 [%ASM,t �,p� [P Srnd •' I aEV x[wL6o]Olk!(n <NAGiC.WYCkRGL MN1A W90 (INW 06j � 4 To ,a `1 �" ti...'� emcRRPVmw Y trx IMM.I Io WL�Ta¢a¢D fem) LC C n caaFwlalic nxnorcRE¢wcixvrnl •1 .,�� .: ¢xEn mi � f �': RrmaP�rr\ uxT °� zb . Inc j Ixovoa�e,nm. ro � �exP�m rnm�p�u CEL L 9 NAW auw✓ m,EfAw.ccwxurrrNlamam[n + zw)colsea rFPfnIVFUUE R \,�; w worec tirPl mouu Pm[ v RucTG io � �r�+' m VE Pd+ax¢ iTmi c t O 7 i/ ✓lam- ✓+t♦.i� Tree Logcnd 1ry `. f • •G (- -. -�j7 ` °!Y }u80L tiFME _5_tuBOL faPrvE ..�� 5• !t rm tsiPi � " v ec naroKOSfuP7 - / °s..r �� _,.,.,� -! a a.cu o' o }�, � % P r �Pm - p; 1 , � --- oEw - •s cnnP . tuxlninR ]'� W�� d nOfE: T$f .1]fG 0] INLNES .lr . ' \ L, u iofim,",:I �r - }}{{ + :.- :"�i,• •f ie El— H— c,]RDE �. nr[ I'\ 1 J H Etl6twc ]YF'1 CfrnCE /� / / +' /(%~ / / % /j /// �-- e `�'~ � ,,l• .G � a �C t ilzcNE'Af• a "Y ursnncewxu„Irr Yom/ ' / Rte• � (0.flNAl 7 --� yuREO Txsx oPPCS� Px P YI - ' • — — — — -s- � — - i ® To eE rano.EO ox osNnmf[o Jt � � �� • ., - -.r inR r� RE„o�m (r'ii � i' a o., mr tc � "zwPxc mP7 E / � - i I ^ •"�' - -� ♦ 4^ • F� M�a1 ( I /I O EnSnnc PNixinc ;vnCi couwT w I I [R slat, Ito P,aur, - \ FR oC"m n� `,.• i0 G no % I I �� ° / /l ..a < .. EsaRnC nnfCff At.lrl rr�"R� Bf � � . \ an.. • t ♦!" � � P eG - Pnsnne eRre vuvE sRU Lu] E ]L Exsunc SRE nYCPUIY nssErmLY -_ f �@ ° Y�� m'r`"" "` •�(r/ro� - � � 1 F -ceh�, r snnr• acnrwn rREVENTEn - � I I .� Egp ° .d ��i'`/ u.w � /Y ♦ "I' ' � J kf uuodmauno wo,<n M1uaxcR _ _ __ �'� ti� 7W? - a, wx Pa[ xPSErs ria nw.., •5' l a winm , +I '�' f/ G �] � unoEnwwury E' 1 � ]4 � kt o Euxrwek unRxtY] _ PRR �.r � \ "�« r: ( fnn} / 3 •� N J: NIDE9Cxdlrl0 lh£PHCnE NnRIIfR - 1� — 0 5� ou nm[ � �r'h� ZOIiE -% - - - .:"�'u•.• J /// — x --- u� — EYlSl.4G S..NIIMY ¢'PE 1 g /i' Per 9 �Wrr " �,q yfApED � f � � PJ [PILII!tG sAWTMY MRNxOLE kF} Ire i Z m eE tuPmE9 (],ai -y ♦ {eL vE • . \1n ' [x slmu r>'E,ro�tuis K,i�,e r �..'.".-T., >: mxe In,xanorl uxc c0 r c>usrx+c Polrca cm[ wEs J{3Y r" -- �m \\ ,. / ` . - ` a i , o ¢ 1 r y [ —i• — :, U, t—NP cRS one / di Iza Cxi5TNC 5TCRY nufxo,!• NE "AEA 1 Yr 9 NAW) ! ,� E,¢sriNC 5teau wPL g •VE- {EEL L 9 NFVO) 5 _ =1 = P� �tWnP Em•I A' r DD fxrsr,NC unun eeLE .�� /�/ /L`.lf/.. .. ...._........_.___..Yui / /........ CS Ens „NC Wa POLE �'""� � µ — � � / ” - A1. — _ w Dd• a� a. \� - h j w.N, N6TETD CO:RRACTDAS: 4 ExsTNG n[D Wr: s�Pr`•]x� i, -$•m"• - U- — — ..._ >.�. 'o — -�aH• tl:raoY of . �. — — - S 1f156�C i/09' -9�; (boy... S,, P) - t nn¢oH mlwmiaEUfnxR fWSltlrG :REE TO 8E RfM04fD -- --rte -- ••••--- ••••••• ^- .. pd "a,ax �y1 rrb- wµm «•�aiiu%u�n�� {[,�.,��'r�, —�' [LLNAIgN NFLRlFR�� TIXIa mRS x[xovm f]m7 voTa .ors f'- CTT^' �c . h.�,.� �� Afl6 ou¢R]FRTUn4ecoNtecY1M! EIMIM[ERT¢WmR:E'A4Ytl1£DRRRn %[ Gulf ConsLCoasultiL]g, iac. PRM—FM- utim's>:sa'+?wC Ww..r orb FsMPnvalaw".Fa few�iu�� RIOHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INGr R �� P� owP ry FRn THE BRIDGE @ ARBQR SHORELi1vE APARTMENTS .0- u,u,mrmvn,amcw, p`�]r�'R Orr Somh fiotemur Aue, wmt Plh 9ntsh A =c1 re n /n =a INt' nm ¢R WED esz-n EXISTING COQ DITiOiVS /DEMOLITION PLAN wwwnu mnaraoe,w,.n.nlrvccw, - j EILIAn@IONA tI TH AMAWM WItt MTMII OMM)vluNNCHVRIa p EVAIIIXiaFLLOIYdtiHNRPoOxII�ERfIGL WIL7AOtlO¢6tY000J. 4CnNE49oN IONxIIpXLGCIx]kIIG'�RUL1Mttu I CW.iT]�Aiuel { ]IiwECIFlNFErrtYaPFfMB]O PEINfl�OAkd6:' %'IPI'JUdEO,'N'LHlCE6NIC9F`It19 1 'VF'1FLeI1u9.M919X6mPEFIDfi .EnFriisx. fUW(k1JFiRME�CT. LEPIEIABERl1 aeS�lOtwv .co[vrrmnw.r¢Imueultxa¢ovnq urrz�n¢ WI£ wott:TO coAreARraAS: �o�E "at �e� o�vcuc altm.nrn�r�oi °emiolo3n E�mvawceLxu ana°mivnoRmxmom xo ]IXGf ultmO ;a t on t>u?txe fN01RRRNMM1gEY1NY11ua neN N o <o eo 16G Pf®APE➢FV0.: v,luT,xutivwrlwX: � Cnilf(.:,wst r,ma.1,:.,�3nc ,.v a..a.a.o.,..o.. .. �r Ixnr tCwwlOag RCHMlAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC. TSTE BRIDGE @ ARBOR SHORELINE APARTMENT'S 677 ft- Aeeom¢y A, 41Em MI sx -° ' , -•�, X.w>,X� xeee reM a ul. n ]3]91 OVERALL SITE PLAN • " „'•••` "°•• _ � _ 3 w'�nrc�blR. evisssmrxwi.,n'�rautca]x, flanenma ....ww. �.. .,. w -eo-l. N Tree Legend E M PA. ommm — E— cnr - cwpHc, :N —S WIMM 71 =all ON L kr EESTNC PRE "YDRAmr ASSEMBLY E.— D":—y EKSIINC —TARY IartNNOLE EXIST- STORM A—CILE E.STNI SRO- PIPE EXI51tND STOP. CRATE EX5TLNC YARD BRAIN EYISVIC PEDESMI&N MCAT ENSTING L11IL17Y POLE t( EXISTING LIOR7 POLE LASTING THE PRoPosm �p STORM PIPE =V p? f ID PROnSEV STOW MANHITU PROPOSED LAAm END SECTION C3 P.105Z0 mlTEYio END SECTION m PROPOSED MET TYPE C CRATE [MET IpRaposZa raor TYPE 4 =9 INLET PROPOSED RII POW SN T 'LOW 0IRECTION SWAI.E DIRECTION NMD SLRFACE ROW PIREC701, PAVEMEN7 MI ARRSW FRCRO ED "IRt HYDRANT A55EMDLY PROPOSED ERE DEPARTMENT CG NECTICN L PEICIPOSED WA7.P MAIN PNOPo= =E V-� PROPOSED SANTA- MANriCLE . . . . . . . . .... _j Nil— PREI. . PRE DWRILE ZF7ECOR 1 CH ECK VA LVE Asm.ULY —lp-o PROPOSCE -TV POI SEWCE CE --------------- — -- 'All", 432 RESIDENT PARKING SPACES PRCPOSEC SANITARY lrlNC CLUBHOUSE PARKING 439 TOTAL PARKING (11 HC SPACES) im 91 RI fa B..M A� W. aW THE BRIDGE @ ARBOR SHORELINE APARTMENTS CHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC. E-. % IiE.,—. IF' W— PN �d% FIL �01 C4 f5so $,X-flu PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN z& The Bridges at Arbor Shoreline Apartments CODE LANDS CAPE PLANS Prepared For: The Richman Group of Florida, Inc. May 2 8, 2 0 14 H M4 TABLE OF CONTENTS SHH7 NUMB2P, SHLh-F NAME L1.00 T—.S—d Fl- Ll 10 T— S— and Removal Chan 1—d"np' Cod' ?4'. U.d—t" PI —T List' 0P i6' .,j N.te' LIN Und—p, Sp,cifi.ti-, 4 F.Es', NOT INCLUDED ;N 21 9' - ND sill .4 FA i r 44 ii R- see 11 4j OR 141 PIP 11 F RP PQ 144 -14 Rog n 1 2 "4 QUIR., 1111 0 • py CODE LANDSCAPE PLANS I'— S— and R,.--A Phi v PPOP A 13 THE BRIDGES A-['ARBOR SHORELINE AIAffaJENTS nul 'slapnH ;n dnoig UE —j3!)4 aql 2IN: J -'dVdV MII- AAOHS)10g21V.I.V 330QIA9 3Hi s n s» f n v a• It�.wwa� puu aw5 aatl 31i1{•X I[I T' SNV [d 9dVDSUNV7 �IQC3o d aaaaa "s aaaasa%a$$e €% E�� €Fa�x�� ss°eammm "�t3a�a�s °s°°a.ma zg �gg g eIaaaIaer asks° a.. mmaxu ¢ax�a�aa8a ,Yaa .:x `. s £aa�.��asam�sn_.. ".„a_aaaaxmaaa �:°££ mss: a: aaamaagaa3r_ ae:££ s. s�z�azaaaa�a. .aaaaaarv..z��aasa�assaaswap��s Ia ss "ae rrcrrrzz3 �� € rr S t,gg=, =oaoe.y °000e s - -ax °00000 i {{� €e6$�a- q- g�tS�:�`EE� :tl 'c 'c° 'a 633333 d3b]��3s aaa ��sSgeeE� m� z�¢��Eeeeeee9�r E ? %e�eE lFre' e9 - ,�,��i3 Pee E aa$ 56 Nsss o r.PL rata eee �zE��@ �r��sssss§$ �iege� " = "��rr�r�;ss��a�aa��zz�aa8 „„ 3s €gas z�ssossassassa��Ga6 anuaA -- ADIAAA AAA s 3 oa1Qaa A�44d,. eI °` o.a ...__ °r.`333si$£& s,xs,u u3388` 3 a'V1...B'd78r88sa ..88_8 oaaasaa6 s.a&b.._33a�8'c aaa__. ..... 8$ b'n 7 E b b b b_3- $3a6'o 3SE; ii 6 8 <`8 $% r-r is a a s, s, sx,° °sys ^3,�g:sss E ^�aaaoaaa�aaaaao €�°- ox° - °a =sa `a $ "$� °o2°aa�e °aaaosa �� a��x ^osaa'a sass$° ��_ agoo ° ^ "s "a aaasas�� ° °o >7- =N9 i35i�9aa333 -%tea - _.'s.a "s "a €e_- �t?p -- - -- --- aia2ge c rr a; °�aa� @� r�rr Y�aaa a¢� r ��y�saaaa ee��r�a� s3aagaaaaa _ rr Y �r�aaa as aaaa a .........e.e$. a� ��o��aaaaaaooaaa�sao�aaaaaaaQaooa��aaaaaaaaoaoo„ HOeaa�as3o��aaaaaaaoa0000Qa�oa��..�e.aaaaaossaao�a �a�aaaa�db33�S�8bbaQe88a� �3SEQa8�addd�d�8 &8b6e,66e £ Hb66 e6 a88ebbaS3SSS8Z06aaaaaE��ddddd� &db33�b3o8E89eoQ I .Erx:,9s,� s,@xsese� e €^m�.g.B.YmS mY,.E.8,k ,f€s9 k° ,"€ $,' ,€Y` x3.Q %m Y 8........ °,:ss rYrx$. ' x° . °Ya .8 ..°..-.. S..E.°a °.@° $,^ � �€�E�EmY.B.E�7 .: .E 9.9 S. a„ maaRmRSZe ,- .- .,sme�= _ "..ssmms�m�m.. » »am ��aazzaRa�amaaa�mas _....NaRxaasasxs�aaasa£ "., .. ..£aa�RRZRmazaaRZSSS_a❑ va iu° %isEEEE Sdb EEEEF Ef_i9° =a5 s "aaaao 3aa3� "sae da_s`a;��EOE�naA _s- ay -p�oo a "a .p �%€oo��d�44a3a� $ss .. aooa� ;a'Y "8 "; 4o €oz € €$ €So9 " €sssa��a�oo�o�oa�?o? etla5�a�33ao osa o Edna ?Y e:ee; s3$�?ssgg _e ib €ia>??sg a€ sa $gee 5 " 3.r1�33� ❑`5aad: a:a nBFa iadd� „..;�,I;o xaz.°sa�3., .;end saannzzz �,�asx�a �.§o o'doodd8cdd�dA 3a v 333ev�a��d��ddn �`3S3L'888 BAY 8,.,. c°° o3°» �' �iS4. oe„ sxSxa.,.,., 5$ �3« �rr o: S' a�' o.,.,n,, ,,mm « „ „as.,eeedeaenen?838d�Oaeo `a8ilu3ceo., ,.o'o'ooi i &ESSS NOT INCLU[)ED + �a KIA - t r - Q 0 ,�' C. 77 Fi - _..... - -© cu -- • ° - - \JIR . 1� - +I 0 Nr- dill f •? 1 00019 Ill"T n W a A \0 it W o 'ODE LANDSCAPE PLANS '02, THE BRIDGES AT ARBOR SHORELINE APAR "l EN o 3 't Cleamiter• FL ' t '- I-+ a y tip' DIX.HI'l'I. O 4 a hand= e Cole Plan The Richman G—p of Florida, Inc- tl t'ar .o- c,•oou •,o•.. 477 smut €:c -v .,TA..n,.,5ui. ioS F'.., PaSn lkvE. FL iiiO3 m TYP]CAL TREE PLANTING CROSS SECTION - N.T.S. 4 .. (,r,•� eAVIGiAr61 seal ropaor asclTnt _ wa:una�roFTwean. ^�� a�r.awwDe 11 Ij pkpL, PlMaNN3 0®0 TlPICALSHRUl PLANTING CROSS SECTION- N.T.D. TYPICAL PALM PLANTING CROSS SECTION -N.TS. U910-01m. A alw�uaaaxwla�M�anlRCasrTOSrnualrt eop�eNU)•eerauNOww.AVU�p w Acwe PuuuamIrEmnuartenee 6 816La1ANa pAWpaCO\'FPOMVMBdDp CLRVCD E�BE3&WLSEPW/l ®NRdYS PNWA81O1NC C:M'® FDDE amr®moIDroesvaErelxoalw Pwa Tha ® Ma1ur PlWH L t 51 a. -ll Lwmolm.mExvtw G.wxO'�4 ca, F Penl Me BHI.irirF P0n1 .9x u-o 1cv. anl .... p PONI . ........ .........� NVn.1a'dr.rfwnx nmp.rm.c4 sem Pen P.Nx.nV 6anrbm m n.1&e' ssm.naanper xnun xr. PC ac mae tl w H6 Mb�.wr GrmrA Hb'.pw x.... BB SHnxu6.wn _. vo mx„hn a�.mr�tnxn S.no Cwoba. s..wlvium.m _. __. _. • -- _ __.. .. .. ...... .. m krrttmmu auri�L+Mni w NN INa�wVeim S.mruw. D..d PntlBprtNXwr P•rxY•�pm X�r • _ MCC Axn� 6evk Wm B.W armor Hwb Cm» ap.P SB Spin a wa . m ee. ... — a 9 Lmnnumn amx Ca'w w. unva.mumvm. Ceunu r .. .. . .... Mlmuxuu.ow H Bel B.Mrpw.'ba P.rNum wrmum p.w..LnHM mVdwU Gx 1 I Ilwn..w p.wafs.... m.ea s.rn eX. -0lae�p emmxaV qy, DO nNw iV 31 v �x me �x r :x a+ LANDSCAPEHOTES t. lP'1M.CIPrRmACIm1P [fie +PVrall.PapY�31��1'pnN wil�lalgOP>'CxO1W Maw TlmufawcPreePECaIPrnDNA nnrwu.mcmKnrnexlltcmmraawpmuu. A (iPPFlaNDafA1d11ADA g1[ O1�N[F@SIAxA�eaIOTR[MO¢VlMllamrt A MLPUNr00L0NP31aCDPD09lD WIMYUY9lWMMJL MLClMGtMIMewALP1R8` ulAw P@PUN Fp1TYPF1. 6 CCNCUCI[RLWVSLAF PIDPptmIB1ESOP➢ CJ. Ti lM6llfaMJIEMLYVIFCRFPPA0Y1A0FMLR /Mffi➢ IAYCIe1FMa CRlIDC/RIDIa PPaaro0lalM1ATDIl FPWRMACAMLiO PaoxuD Papn ro uNDeraix Mannecle arPnpv,.� mN1MC1Dle rm3. sc smazr m ataxAT.a Tpe wm va +r me wwew.e ru�1�a Imwear.w ne wMlwnolev DwN E49i6 r. a111PnVmarplLelwClltD YIRAIIIII ®?1¢AeoVAma1GA �.t1uCIOt FiWiA! fo-baoreunr: ras PROPEY PvJtf NPUn1 w asalra was A mxm�clDrlewu P® nunit epn. mlDlDSPln3romNeTawmoN9roD�ralpo ;NUnxmaraT�roeua Rx WwRMayronnmcsnxaraaDARFXS1AlANra ]CPT -1T W BDLMal11ENAFaarasCAalm alTlePmul- norraTmm. eeeTreumroaeaveraalr ✓,icxAfatuaewenuumli a wxlw�cmnex .weefeesormuapwlposaumra WmPaal.u.vaa�ecno�fe FTRWM.W raMWACMg111iMCSCf. to Imveldel�f lKwetl4famngN.ifaStmcamlta 11. xxncicral tANUl.xaurruaTPrl�aPww -amlrnm R wLFNLLOlTI�AICMI!l RDG(Ma WNaIIaGDCk DmDw. 1i Nap MWA�TWMI. RTLRT1E11RSLrWWR�I�RTIDaCNtmPi1 !l RIWVACWN1111G u o0rr11t rcTaawillPCxMi '11®1111b11e ®nxleaM� 1pVleve[A¢TeM 16 PNOAroIIOVV ALM/ xNMl 6. M111 ®TCOAMIVd®IIPLLINVAPRCRL'IBIGIPB exa+aa l0. WIOFCXl CCKIMCiQI>t 14LFGRA'ONF0.leC111K1ApIMITN20Nw RW CUR�TII� ra QVMRiIRbt NT1El VwrIATaF ]i4EgLYpS�9Yl0Ei0raPMNEftAVDLA TIRNCUREESWNa IF.4CM0lW�SiI�OFN'111G11116CR. IfR.S.lpllllyLi6116CNW 0.NMRili0. 1r. s�Aew�lwxuleacsnM�wre fuasr�oansr�vlta rlusvrrcrwnasw,. aeNmwwwnlePemwPaauaxnucTronmw�naaroulowM lwnrw.man+ll. a�u.numA NYLEEPtdIUED'ftl11EFA1AN0NOLLTHf. mNnv�nemewa zwaepnFSnnPl.wrwmevunAenro �„ awlvolr,Amrltsrwls . sm n1olm.ouPl�rrv'a1a. IA CCNTPICIpt BNLLLB! NISPCINE[100N WARNII}Y W NA.Llw W %MRF W p4N1l LY'6. 1. V.CLPJp DICON0.CCMRl CIORCNHJYHaVpi6M90CFD. pAI£ Y. CCW /�Ci ®pldlOIIPLYPCOXI.YCW1YFPw0S 1 R iwDllt.9 Ba0RW0XRCMASIDitIW W WMONANCOGRAXFORVr19RM ®NLIWTpI ewealeNM01'EpRUM1C 1bNars191rtMlmeaplmPmmmrxa0lraYmurP�ae Plprs. `4 G i a d 1 ':. E C7 C r 0.' 5 3 r 4 r~ r~ c� U7 --I z u U k I rc a G "C 0 TYPICALSHRIA LAYOUT T PIAN• N.T.S. L2.ao 00' cl O fl -M "1 .1- 1wv -1.- Ma, - 1=11, IMIll"ZI.- �Mlll T= —N"l I'tf, '30 b"0 THE "BRIDGE" AT ARBOR SHORELINE APARTMENTS PARKING ASSESSMENT According to the City of Clearwater Community Development Code attached dwellings (apartments) are required to have parking at a ratio of 2 spaces per dwelling unit. As such, this 236 unit apartment complex would require 472 parking spaces to meet code. The existing office buildings located on the 6.75 acre western Parcel require 3 parking spaces/ 1000 square feet. As such, the required parking for the 81,353 square feet of office is 244 spaces required by code. Total code required parking is 716 spaces (244 for existing remaining office + 472 for the apartments). The site currently contains 835 parking spaces many of which are unused. Redevelopment of the property would reduce the impervious surface by removing many of the existing parking spaces and constructing parking that is actually necessary. The western 6.75 acres contains 255 parking spaces thereby meeting code requirements for the 81,353 square feet of office to remain. The eastern 15.77 acres, will include 439 parking spaces for the 236 units which is a ratio of 1.83 spaces /unit. Total parking provided is 694 spaces (97% of the code requirement). Richman Group has found that the apartment complexes do not typically generate the need for 2 spaces /unit. The number of bedrooms is an accurate predictor of necessary parking spaces. This ratio usually falls in the 1 -1.05 spaces per bedroom range. In this case the Arbor Shoreline Apartments will be developed as follows: 78 (1BR units) = 78 bedrooms 139 (2BR units) = 278 bedrooms 19 (3BR units) = 57 bedrooms 236 total units = 413 total bedrooms The provided 439 apartment parking spaces is a ratio of 1,06 spaces per bedroom. By comparison the Amalfi apartment complex on Hampton Road in Clearwater contains 108 units, 214 bedrooms and provides 216 total spaces, a ratio of 1.01 spaces per bedroom. Richman Group has also used this calculation method for the Gateway Apartments in Pinellas Park, where a parking variance was granted based on 1.06 spaces /bedroom for a 432 unit apartment complex containing 728 bedrooms and 770 spaces. (770 spaces / 728 bedrooms = 1.06) The on -site parking spaces are adequate to satisfy the calculated demand and justifies the flexibility to standard code requirements for attached dwellings. THE "BRIDGE" AT ARBOR SHORELINE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT Redevelopment of this property would provide for a 236 unit apartment complex. The project will be developed with apartments and will also include a clubhouse for use by the residents. The apartments will replace 136,979 square feet of office space that currently exists on the 15.77 acres near Old Tampa Bay. Using average weekday trip generation rates from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) !Cip Generation, 9t" Editi_on would be appropriate. Attached are excerpts from ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition. Land Use Code 220 (Apartments) and Land Sue Code 710 (General Office) and the average trip generation rates are as follows: Apartments = 6.65 daily trips /unit, 0.51 AM peak hour trips /unit, 0.62 PM peak hour trips /unit Office = 11.02/1,000 SF 1.56 AM peak hour trip /1,000 SF, 1.49 PM peak hour trips /1,000 SF The proposed apartment complex would generate 1,569 daily trips, of which 120 would occur during the AM peak hour and 146 would occur during the PM peak hour. By contrast the 136,979 SF of office space being removed would generate 1,510 daily trips of which 214 would occur during the AM peak hour and 204 would occur during the PM peak hour. The trip generation of the proposed redevelopment as apartments would be lower than the existing development during the peak hours therefore a detailed traffic analysis is not necessary. The redevelopment would reduce traffic generation from the site on a peak hour basis. Apartment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units W On a: Weekday ' s Number of Studies: 88 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 210 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.65 1.27 - 12.53 3.37 Data Plot and Equation 7,000 6,000 51000 W ~ 4,000 a> V N 7 (D 3,000 N Q F-- 2,000 1,000 X , X X.' , X, X ; X --- -- - - - - - --- - - - --. -- --- ---- .. -. X -X X X' X ; ;X X X ' X — - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ---- ---- -- X < X: X 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 6.06(X) + 123.56 700 800 900 1000 ---- -- Average Rate R2 = 0.87 Trip Generation, 91h Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 333 Apartment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 78 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 235 Directional Distribution: 20% entering, 80% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Hates Standard Deviation 0.51 0.10 - 1.02 0.73 Data Plot and Equation U) C W Q. a� U r c`u 2 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 X X X---- --- : X X xx ---- .X----.- �-- X; ---- ---- ---- ---- - -- -- --- X X XX )5<X XX X - X-X X X ; X: X X XX X XX Q 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Dumber of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.49(X) + 3.73 334 Trip Generation, 9th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers 700 800 900 1000 1100 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.83 Apartment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. x Number of Studies: 90 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 233 Directional Distribution: 65% entering, 35% exiting i rip generation per uweuing unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.62 0.10 - 1.64 0.82 ®ata Pilot and 700 600 500 - c W cz. ~ 400 N U_ N 300 200 100 - - ; - • - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - = • - - : - - - ; - - - - - - - • - ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;-- . - - - - - . - - - X X X �iCf --------------- -- ----- -------- -- • -X - - -- • - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- X X -- - - - -- , - - -- -- 'X -X , - -- , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X :X X X; XXXX X X X" X }X<; X X X X X: XX 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.55(X) + 17.65 700 800 900 1000 1100 - - - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.77 Trip Generation, 9th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers 335 General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 79 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 197 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trio Generation Der 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 11.03 3.58 - 28.80 6.15 Data Plot ana Equation Ll! CL h m U m a 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 - -- - ------ �/. J ---- ----- -' - • - - - - - - - -- -- --- 1, - _ - - - • • , - - - , - - -- - -- - - • - - - - - - - - - -- - - ,- - - • - , - - - - - - - - , X , J -- -- --- - - -Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - • - -- . - -- - - -- . ;� X --- -, - - -- : -- -- --- -- -XX /X X X; X ; ; X '1- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- • - - -- ; - -• - - - -: X� :X- X X - -- -- ; - --- --- -- -- - -- . .. - -- ---- -- -- ----- X ; : xX- X- X -- ,X k - ---- ------ ------ - - -- ---- ---- --- ' - --. -. -- • -- -- -- ----- - ---• ------ ---•------ --;- •- --;--- ,X-- '------ = 1------ 1------ '------ 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Paints Fitted Curve ------ Average Elate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.76 Ln(X) + 3.68 R2 = 0.81 Trip Generation, 9th Edition 0 Institute of Transportation Engineers 1259 General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip (Ends vs: On a: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies: 218 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 222 ,Directional Distribution: 88% entering, 12% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate , Range of Rates Standard Deviation �Ix:2.1[7ffJjT&L Fn 4,000 3,000 C W ,t7 z U .0 2,000 fU Q 1,000 0 1.40 /J , r /l • J , r , /r J /r X /rl '.x X /k x ; ------- X -- -- 'f - --------------- ----------------------- X� �xrF � x X ; x xxx xxx x ; xxx , x �+ 0 t000 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve t Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 1.57 1260 Trip Generation, 9th Edition ® Institute of Transportation Engineers 2000 3000 - - - - -- Average Rate R2 = 0.83 General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trjp Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a. Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA Directional Distribution 236- 215 17% entering, 83% exiting Trio Generation Der 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1,49 0.49 - 6.39 1.37 Data Plot and Eauation 4,000 3,000 C: LLJ F- <D 2,000 a) 0) Ed a) l- 1,000 0 X ------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------- -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X IX XX X - - -- - ---- -- - X. . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X - - --- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X, XX X X X X .X XX X X X YX 1000 2000 X = 1000 Sq, Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points — Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T =1.12(X) + 78.45 3000 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.82 Trip Generation, 9th Edition ® Institute of Transportation Engineers 1261 STORMWATER NARRATIVE For THE BRIDGE AT ARBOR SHORELINE APARTMENTS The proposed project consists of redeveloping the easternmost 15.77 acres of the Arbor Office Center, located in Pinellas County in the City of Clearwater, with a 236 -unit apartment complex. This portion of the Arbor Office Center is currently developed with 4 office buildings, associated parking, walkways, utilities and stormwater management system. The Center was originally constructed before SWFWMD regulation implementation but has since been modified and permitted through SWFWMD under ERP #20143. Note that in August of 2005 ERP modification 20143.001 was approved which was to consist of the construction of additional office buildings, a parking garage and upgrades to the existing stormwater management system. The additional buildings and parking garage were never constructed but the stormwater improvements were completed and transferred to operation on October 24, 2012 (see attached). Additionally, in September of 2012 ERP #20143.002 was approved for the construction of an additional 103 parking spaces on the west portion of the center to serve the existing Lincare office buildings. Currently stormwater runoff from the entire site is collected and eventually routed to a dry pond located along the eastern boundary of the site adjacent to Old Tampa Bay. There is a filter drain system installed within the berm of this pond which provides water duality for the entire project. Re-grading of this pond and been, installation of the filter drain and construction of a concrete overflow weir were completed in 2012 as part of the SWFWMD ERP modification #20143.001 which was previously mentioned in this narrative. Stormwater runoff from this site discharges into Old Tampa Bay or WBID #1625 which has been designated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as impaired with dissolved oxygen and nutrients. Per FS 373.414(1)(b)(3) and BOR 3.3.1.4, projects that discharge to impaired receiving waters must demonstrate that post - development pollutant loading is equal to or less than pre - development. This will be accomplished on this project as a result of removing paved driving surfaces and reducing the total impervious surface area on the site. As shown on the proposed site plans, this project will reduce the total impervious surface area by 0.71 acres which will not only reduce pollutant loading but will also reduce the peak runoff rate from the site. Therefore, no additional stormwater attenuation or treatment will be required as part of this project. 'TIP Southwest Florida ,t � 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604 -6899 U y (352) 796 -7211 or 1- 800 -423 -1476 (FL only) Water Management District TDD only: 1- 800- 231 -6103 (FL only) On the Internet at WaterMatters.org An Equa€ Bartow Service office Sarasota Service Office Tampa Service office oppod-Ity 170 Century Boulevard 6750 Fruiiville Road 7601 Highway 301 North Employer Bartow, Florida 33830.7700 Sarasota, Florida 34240 -9711 Tampa, Florida 33637 -6759 (863) 534 -1448 or (941) 377 -3722 or (813) 985 -7481 or 1- 800 -492 -7862 (FL only) 1 -800- 320 -3503 (FL only) 1- 800 -835 -0797 (FL only) October 24, 2012 Kevin M. Showe Golden Shoreline Limited Partnership 19321 -C U.S. Highway 19 North Clearwater, Ft_ 33764 Subject: Transfer to Ope Project Name: Permit No.: Compliance No.: County: Dear Mr. Showe: ration Phase Arbor Shoreline 44020143.001 360685 Pinellas The request to transfer the subject permit to the operation phase has been approved. District staff have reviewed the as -built drawings, inspected the project and determined that the surface water management system was in compliance at the time of our inspection. The District reserves the right to inspect the project in the future to ensure continued compliance with state law and District rules. The subject permit contains conditions requiring periodic inspection and maintenance. The inspections are required every 18 months. The inspection results must be reported to the District on the enclosed form entitled "Statement of Inspection for Proper Operation and Maintenance." Please refer to the enclosed permit to determine the inspection schedule and when this form should be filed. As outlined in Subsection 40D- 4.351(1)(a), "A Permittee shall notify the District within 30 days of any sale, conveyance or any other transfer for a permitted surface water management system or the real property at which the system is located. " For your convenience, we have enclosed a "Notification and Request for Transfer of Environmental Resource Permit" form to submit for transferring the permit. If you have questions, please contact Samir O. Chehab, P.E. at the Tampa Service Office. Sincerely, Michelle K. Hopkins, P.E. Bureau Chief Environmental Resource Permit Bureau Regulation Division SOC:kIs Enclosures: Executed Statement of Completion form, As -built Drawings, Copy of Permit, Notification and Request for Transfer of Environmental Resource Permit form cc: File of Record Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. P' R013ERSON ZZESOURCU CROUP, LLC Landscape Architectural Design & Consulting To: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP From: Patrick Roberson, RLA, ISA Date: 04/19/14 Re: Arbor Shoreline -- Existing Tree Inventory 04114 A site visit was conducted on April 16, 2014 to review the highly visible, general conditions of the existing trees at the Arbor Shoreline site, in Clearwater, Florida. The existing trees were reviewed and rated utilizing the required criteria of the City of Clearwater's rating sysle €n. This system rates the trees on a scale from I to 6, with 1 being dead or in decline and 6 being a specimen tree in excellent condition. This review was conducted by Patrick Roberson of Roberson Resource Group, LLC who is an ISA Certified Arborist (# FL- 1051A) and Florida Registered Landscape Architect (# LA0001461), In general, there were 305 trees on site in mostly good to fair condition (Average rating of 3). Most of the trees were Live Oak (Quercus virginiana) with some Laurel Oak (Quercus laurifolia), Red Bay (Persea borbonia), Pignut Hickory (Carya glabra), Camphor Tree (Cinnamomum camphora), Queen Palm (Syagrus romanzoffiana), Washingtonia Palm (Washingtonia robusta), a few Saba] Palm (Sabal Palmetto), a few Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandil7ora), a few Red Maple (Aces rubrum), a few Water Oak (Quercus nigra) and a Canary Island Date Palm (Phoenix canariensis). The Live Oak tended to be in fair condition (rating 3) with minor issues of canopy die back, root system impacts generally due to the site parking areas and some minor structu €'al issues with branching or trunk structures. Any Live Oaks classified as poor (rating 2) tended to have cracks or large splits in the trunk/larger branches, area of rot from broken branches in the canopy that had not healed properly or mistletoe present in the canopy. The Laurel Oak, Camphor and Pignut Hickory tended to be split between good (rating 3) and those classified as poor (rating 2). The poor rated trees tended to have more issues with areas of rot in the trunk and branches, presence of fungi and dead wood in the canopy. The poor rated Live Oak and Laurel Oak were generally the larger and older trees. The Red Maples tended to be in poor condition (rating 2) due to overall poor structure and rot. The palms (Sabal, Queen, Washingtonia and Date Palm) tended to be in good condition, mainly due to being installed within the last year. Attached is the summary of the existing tree ratings and a full size (22 "04 ") plan of the Existing Tree Inventory (Sheets ETI & ET2) with that contains the information within the summary in plan form with the corresponding tree numbers. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information 3152 Little Rd., #125, Trinity, Florida 34655 Phone: 727 -255 -4258 Email: info @RRGonline.net Florida License No. - LC26000267 Arbor Shoreline Existing Tree Inventory 04/14 Data Summary Tree Number Tree Type Genus/ Species Diameter at Breast Height General Condition Rating I Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 8 3 2 3 4 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra, Carya glabra 11 2 - --------- 3 -- ----- - --- 3 Pignut Hickory 9 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 8 5 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 12 3 ... .. G Pignut Hickory Carya glabra, 10 . . .......... ......... 3 7 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 11 3 8 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 9,7 2 9 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 12 3 . . . . .......... .. . 10 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 16 2 11 12 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 14 3 2 Live 0 ak Quercus virginiana 30 13 - Red Bay Persea borbonia 7 14 Red Bay Persea borbonia 7 . . ..... ... .. 2 15 Red Bay Persea borbonia 9 2 16 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 17 Red Bay Persea borbonia 9 2 18 Red Bay Persea borbon,ia---- 10 3 19 Red Bay Persea borbonia 9 3 3 3 20 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15 21 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 22 Red Bay Persea borbonia 6 T 23 Red Bay Persea borbonia 7 2 24 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 22 25 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 27 3 26 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 8 -4 27 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 8 4 28 29 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 10 4 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 4 30 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 8 4 31 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 26 2 32 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 9 4 33 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 34 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 35 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 36 Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 14 4 4 37 38 Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 14 14 Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 4 39 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 4 40 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 12 4 41 Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto 11 4 42 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 43 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 1 24 1 3 Page 1 of 7 Arbor Shoreline Existing Tree Inventory 04/14 Data Summary Tree Number Tree Type Genus / Species Diameter at Breast Height General Condition Rating 44 Date Palm Phoenix canariensis 14 4 45 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 46 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 22 .. . ..... ......... .. 3 3 3 47 48 Laurel Oak - - Quercus laurifolia 24 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 18 49 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 23 2 50 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 8 4 51 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 52 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 53 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana _.. 11 ............. _ -.. . 4 54 Queen Palm - _... Syagrus romanzoffiana 8 4 55 Queen Palm -- Syagrus romanzoffiana ...... _.. 8 4 - -- 4 56 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 57 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 11 4 58 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 12 4 59 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 4 60 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 9 4 61 Red Maple Acer rubrum 15 2 62 Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 16 4_ 63 Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 13 4 - 64 _ Washingtonia Palm .. ......_._ Washingtonia robusta -- _ .... 16 .._.. .. . 4 4 65 -- Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 15 66 Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 15 4 67 Washingtonia Palm Washingtonia robusta 18 4 68 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 4 69 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 12 4 70 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 9 4 71 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 4 72 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 4 73 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 14 4 74 Queen Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana 10 4 75 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 22,17 3 76 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 5 4 77 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 5 4 78 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 5 4 79 Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 4 4 80 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 18, 11, 11 3 81 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 37 3 82 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora _ 9 2 _._. 83 -. Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 15 3 84 Pignut Hickory - Carya glabra 10 2 85 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 17 2 86 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 15 3 87 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 1 9 2 Page 2 of 7 Arbor Shoreline Existing Tree Inventory 04/14 Data Summary Tree Number Tree Type Genus / Species Diameter at Breast Height General Condition Rating 88 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 17, 9, 8 3 89 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 14 2 90 91 92 Pignut Hickory Pignut Hickory Camphor Carya glabra 8,8 2 .............. 3 2 Carya glabra 11 - Cinnamomum camphora . 14,12 93 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 18 3 94 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 9 3 95 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 36 3 96 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 97 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 3 98 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 99 - 100 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 ._.._........_ 14 2 -- -- Laurel Oak _ Quercus laurifolia 2 101 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 34 3 102 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 3 103 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15 3 104 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 105 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 17 2 106 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 107 ...... 108 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 14 3 - - Live Oak - ...... Quercus virginiana — 18 ....... 3 3 - . 109 - -- Sabal Palm - Sabal palmetto 10 110 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 16 3 111 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 112 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 2 113 Water Oak Quercus nigra 10 3 114 Water Oak Quercus nigra 15 3 115 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 15 2 116 _ 117 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 13 - - -- 3 - - Camphor - ......_... Cinnamomum camphora 11,10 3 118 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 2 119 live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 120 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 3 121 hive Oak Quercus virginiana 18 2 122 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 8,8 2 123 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 13 3 124 125 126 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 24 3 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 14 2 Live Oak virginiana 11 3 127 Live Oak _Quercus Quercus virginiana 22 2 128 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 24 3 f 129 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 3 130 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 131 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 4 Page 3 of 7 Arbor Shoreline Existing Tree Inventory 04/14 Data Summary Tree Number Tree Type Genus / Species Diameter at Breast Height General Condition Rating 132 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 22 3 133 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 24 4 134 135 136 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15 3 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 16 3 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 137 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 13,13 2 138 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 139 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 14 3 140 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 12 3 141 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 15 3 142 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 35 3 143 Live Oak Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana 48 3 2 144 Live Oak 24 145 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 30 2 146 Camphor Cinnamomum camphora 12 3 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 8 3 148 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 15 3 149 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 15, 10 3 ISO Live Oak Quercus virginiana 40 3 151 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia Quercus nigra 9 14 15 3 . . .... ..... . . 152 153 Water Oak 2 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 154 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 11,16 3 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 11 3 156_ Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 3 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 18 2 158 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 20 3 159_ Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 19 2 160 161 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 15 2 2 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 28 162 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia is 3 163 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 11 3 164 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 18, 12 2 165 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 16 3 166 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 167 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 168 169 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 2 3 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 170 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 27 171 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 30 3 172 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 2 173 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 3 174 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 2 175 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 24 2 Page 4 of 7 Arbor Shoreline Existing Tree Inventory 04/14 Data Summary Tree Number Tree Type Genus / Species Diameter at Breast Height General Condition Rating 176 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 11 3 177 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 11 3 178 Chinaberry Exotic 13, 12 _ 15 2 - ..._._. -- 179 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 180 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 10 3 181 Chinaberry Exotic 11 2 182 Chinaberry Exotic 15 2 183 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 8 3 184 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 23 3 185 Water Oak Quercus nigra 14 2 186 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia -- .......... 14 2 187 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 188 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 3 189 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 22 2 190 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 23 3 191 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 25 3 192 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 23 3 193 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 24 3 194 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15 2 195 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 22 2 196 Live Oak .. ...... -- Quercus virginiana 26 2 197 Live Oak Quercus virginlana 30 3 198 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 2 199 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 42 3 200 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 11 3 201 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 26 3 202 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 19 3 203 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 22 3 204 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 9 3 205 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 206 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 6 2 207 _ Live Oak . _. Quercus virginiana 17 2 208 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 27 3 209 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 3 210 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 22 2 211 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 31 3 212 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia - 22 - 2 213 . .... ...... — Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 25 2 214 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 25 3 215 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 27 3 216 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 22 3 217 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 23 _ 3 218 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15 3 219 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 2 Page 5 of 7 Arbor Shoreline Existing Tree Inventory 04/14 Data Summary Tree -Number Tree Type Genus / Species Diameter at Breast Height General Condition Rating 3 220 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 18,15 221 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 16 3 222 Live Oak _ . Pignut Hickory Laurel Oak Quercus virginiana 13 3 223 _ ... -- Carya glabra 30 2 224 Quercus laurifolia 11 2 225 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 15 2 226 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15, 12, 10 3 227 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 20 3 228 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 2 229 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 3 230 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 231 Live Oak Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana 11 13 3 232 -- ............... - Live Oak 2 233 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 234 Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto 12 4 235 Sabal Palm Sabal palmetto 14 4 236 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 4 4 237 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 4 4 238 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 4 4 239 Live Oak Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana 4 19 24 4 240 Live Oak 3 241 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 2 242 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 24 3 243 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 18 3 244 Live Oak _____ Quercus virginiana 20 3 245 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 25 3 246 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 2 247 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 3 248 Live Oak Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana 15 2 249 Live Oak 20 2 250 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 24 3 251 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 24 3 252 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15 3 253 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 16 3 254 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 255 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 22 3 256 Live Oak Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana 12 3 257 Live Oak 30 3 258 Live Oak 33 3 259 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 25 2 260 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 25 3 261 Live Oak virginiana 19 2 262 Live Oak _Quercus Quercus virginiana 4 4 263 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18,8 3 Page 6 of 7 Arbor Shoreline Existing Tree Inventory 04/14 Data Summary Tree Number Tree Type Genus / Species Diameter at Breast Height General Condition Rating 264 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 28 2 265 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 4 4 266 267 268 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 30 2 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 24 11,5 36 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 3 269 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 19,13 2 270 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 17 2 271 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 18 2 272 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 17 3 273 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 26 2 274 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 10 2 275 Laurel Oak Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia Quercus laurifolia 12 3 276 24, 24, 22 2 277 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 24 3 278 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 8 3 279 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 5, 11, 11 3 280 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 8 3 281 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 8 3 282 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 27 3 283 Live Oak Quercus virginiana Quercus virginiana - - -- - - ... Quercus virginiana 24 2 ...... .. 284 Live Oak .. 12 3 ----- 285 Live Oak 13 3 286 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 7 2 287 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 18 4 288 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 10 3 289 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 8 3 290 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 7 3 291 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 292 293 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 10 3 3 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 15 294 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 14 3 295 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 12 3 296 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 15, 13, 12 3 297 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 8 3 298 Pignut Hickory Carya glabra 8 3 299 Pignut Hickory - - Carya glabra 11 3 300 Red Maple Acer rubrum Acer rubrum 12 2 2 3 301 Red Maple 12 302 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 14 303 Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 20 3 304 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 3 305 Live Oak Quercus virginiana 19 2 Page 7 of 7 m 5 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET ET2 �i 9 v g'f)BH - 5 Ney 6 T 6 QVTrta T" 2 �.�• N¢mhvr Arse1 a iuiinq napy � �r.•.e •Fawn n a , naf aAOSn an nd y CG Ccrya. 9 =abm — !,ICkay P9 Peneo ¢rao a _ Ree &¢X CL Bae.e v leu�i¢lia — .xl pak ov9at]4h Pp Phc 4 to Pofm AR A b Imelto .Sohat Palm AR A brum Ree h1¢ple S nR y p 0 PP dG P. s Phe M p 3 vh .s. eme r¢auiae) Roberson, I ARBOR SHORELINE Nm Resource woe THE Cmup.LLC n um Enl rl Gas �,YI G =Inc EXISTING TREE INVENTORY 0411 RICHMAN GROUT' -- „N N la ➢ [g.. vnvNifiFrG Frtm, fa WS]# 4P S. R¢eamvry AVa.SWIV ]09 ClesruatN, West Palm 9aoch, FL aG4G1 7.`v. =+.mss 5n rig �acre,ie.rel um. aarn..�„e FIoflda _ d °mow I es�..r „�r��,tra,t�ia tapa�„.IiPnB r.PFaaf>r ®rae�r«Pa�a�..�,�m m °I on . a %. .fm.rseme. x r Nam v iq cyemienvelmx.a Wirt P.mkmsmeianae ,Lg npya - -1, I ibo tcnap4 f - ti:aVrvG stl ui M,Y h e.®oemmge� treae crc bvaatl I pnvt¢G hY y. tl¢tatl 9f1&. reiNGaeasgxa..tieti'a aH gti.vderx.rm nrnrgrvN.vrc Cwal¢pment Caee9 t w't'vc 0@Heef 4� r lorgar a.A o �e y. enm o:�•= wvm nvt¢eea 'n tiv siviing Tmv invmntvry. �6 em,vn h emyw meveiryv a�uc -•iem- � m armor •ahooa am ra1ro•� tree.rm eargtl IemepWenyang w p w I. �•Ue zamy .mm a.. a* evvem, f mme ateava uef salunn.tls�w sra�..• =arc T. �. rev.. a a-0GS a EXISTING TREE A, INVENTORY PLAN er 4Nt9ii4 ET1 Gcle C MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET ET1 .\, �-, ~~~z=.~~~-~~~ --~-~T--~~~ \ y� | ` / / / / lql ' ' ' / � \ \ | \ ` ` ~ \ \ | " / | � ! \ \ . | ' / . / E-�� [-^~~~^~°~. I~�~~� OL 01,11, � Roberson ARBOR SHORELINE THE Resource It EXISTING TREE Group, LLC EXISTING TREE INVENTORY TWENTORY RICHMAN GROUP PLAN THE RICHMAN GROUP OF FLORIDA INC. 477 S ROSEMARY AVE STE 301 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 PAY TO THE ORDEROF-� �)071L- mmm - -7_ JZ1