The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2014-02002� h � +�a��t�r � �.,,_.r-�,,��"�...f-�.� J ti�`. r°�`^..��'"\,_.�,"��_./"'i../'' MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: REQUEST: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT June 17, 2014 F.1 FLD2014-02002 Flexible Development application to allow 418 square feet of Restaurant use in an existing 1,357 square foot building in the Tourist(T) District with a lot area of 032 acres (1,374 square feet), a lot width of 60 feet (along Mandalay Avenue) and 22.9 feet (along Kendall Street), front (east and south) setbacks of zero feet (to building), side (north and west) setbacks of zero feet (to building), zero parking spaces and a building height of 12 feet (to top of flat roo fl as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-803.D as well as a reduction to the required foundation landscaping area width from fve feet to zero feet as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Community Development Code section 3-1202.G. GENERAL DATA: Agent ........ .. .... ..... ... ..... Joseph H. Erwin Owne� .............................. Xania, Inc., James Lampathakis Location .......................... 600 Mandalay Avenue; the properly is located at the northwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Kendall Street. Property Size .................... 0.03 acres Future Land Use Plan...... Resort Facilities High (RFH) Zoning ..... ............ ... .. .... Tourist (T) District Special Area Plan .............. Beach by Design (Old Florida) Adjacent Zoning.... North: Tourist (T) District South: Tourist (T) District East: Tourist (T) District West: Tourist (T) District Existing Land Use ............. Office Proposed Land Use......... Office and Restaurant ;,r�i�i:l'� ��P�rm� -� r*' � — �, � - � �u � i ,�� - � �'� a, � .�_,v��i� � �r � - � ; . �,,� � _ � � � ;. � �.�� fw�� e � �� R � �a'' - � � ;i * � :, � �t; � � ^_ 'tu ��;.��vt�r�i �r�ir � .� � � � ` � ;u , `��' , a� ` ��..; r� z , _ �, AERIAL MAP ' viVRl �t11�1 Level II Flexible Development Application Review .. . . . �,%�g`a.,�aw�.e., _. . ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.03 acre site is located at the northwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Kendall Street with 60 feet of frontage along Mandalay Avenue and 29.9 feet along Kendall Street. There is no vehicular access onto the site as it is almost entirely covered by the existing building. The parcel contains a 1,357 square foot single-story building with two tenant spaces that have historically been used as offices. The subject property is within the Tourist (T) District; the intent and purpose of which is that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The uses and development potential of a parcel of land within the T District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property, including any acreage or floor area restrictions set forth in the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, as amended from time to time. For those parcels within the T District that have an area within the boundaries of and governed by a special area plan approved by the city council and the countywide planning authority, m�imum development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of us e and location in the approved plan. The immediate vicmrty is characterized by a variety of uses including attached dwellings, office and restaurant to the north, automobile service station and overnight accommodations to the south, open space to the east and overnight accommodations to the west. The surrounding properties are within the T and OS� D1SiT'1CtS. 0 IDLEVNLD ST PROJECT SITE V �C � O � � v KENDALL S�f� �� 0 2 W m W a 3 � PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVEI.OPMENT REVIEW DIVISION W � a g � - � �� W � ? o { a .� � N < ❑ m BAY ESPLANADE LOCATION MAP 614 1p 612 N N N tf��f GiO � - -- - AVALON ST , L� N.T.3' ._ ._ NI N', � �:� � I ON/1` 605 — �4 � rs � �.o o �. ..N... N.. ��r KENDALL ST � � 603 ZONING MAP 614 . N � N N �M BiT � s,oi AVALON ST .�. � Nj N N �N N Restaurant eo4 � 1'i � Overnight �o� � Accommodations • - - -- - �i i� : KENDALL ST 805 622ELCBX �....,.. , � Q � B04 �.�, � N.T.3; Open Space BY2ELCBX JUANII'A WAY No landscaping exists on the property, as -;� r,,, previously mentioned, the building almost Automobile Servfee Overnight entirely covers the subject property thus Station Aecommodatioes � _ 604 removing available space for any type of '-- ' landscaping. EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Community Development Board - June 17, 2014 FLD2014-02002 - Page 1 ' Lla�ai 1'F[ill.l Level II.Flexible Development Application Re�iew. pL`'.�vc•rING&DEV�LOPMErrr DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION ° .. < "?'4NF'i:,•: Development Proposal: The proposal is to establish 418 square feet of restaurant use in an existing one-story building with no site development proposed. The primary changes will be the interior renovation of the tenant space to allow restaurant use including kitchen and dining facilities as well as building fa�ade changes and outdoor seating. The south and east building facades facing Kendall Street and Mandalay Avenue, respectively, are to be painted teal in color consistent with the Beach by Design color palette. In addition, the east fa�ade will include exterior lighting and a faux shutter as well as retracting door to allow for walk-up service. The applicant has requested flexibility with regard to the required lot area, rear setback and number of required off-street parking spaces. Pursuant to CDC Section 2-803, the required lot area can range between 5,000 to 10,000 square feet, the rear setback can range from 10 to 20 feet and seven to 12 parking spaces are required per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. As the lot area is 1,374 square feet, a zero foot rear setback is proposed and there is no room for off-street parking spaces, the development proposal is being reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project due to the flexibility requests. With regard to the request for zero off- street parking spaces, a parking demand study with methodology approved by City staff was submitted and will be discussed in more detail in the off-street parking section of the report Special Area Plan: Beach by Design: Old Florida District The City has demonstrated through the creation of Beach by Design and subsequent amendments to this plan that it recognizes the need for pedestrian-friendly development in order to create a vibrant active resort and waterfront destination serving tourists and locals alike. It is understood that a broad range of uses including retail sales and service, hotels and motels and restaurants contribute to the creation of the unique character and atmosphere that is Clearwater Beach. And pursuant to Beach by Design, the Old Florida District supports the development of limited retail/ commercial fronting along Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street. As such, the proposed change of use from office to restaurant for a subject property fronting Mandalay located north of Bay Esplanade and south of Somerset Street is supported by the Beach by Design Old Florida District. Beach bv Desi�n: Section VII. Design Guidelines: Beach by Design provides that the implementation of the document involves more than community redevelopment initiatives, it also involves private development and redevelopment that conforms to design objectives and principles established in Beach by Design. These objectives and principles will help the City promote safety, encourage cleanliness, and provide a comfortable environment. It should be noted that any issue not addressed in the Design Guidelines shall be governed by the requirements of the CDC. Furthermore, the Design Guidelines are intended to be administered in a flexible manner to achieve the highest quality built environment for Clearwater Beach. Section C addresses issues relating to design, scale and building mass. These topics are quantified in six parts as follows: Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet or a single dimension greater than 100 feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three Community Development Board — June ] 7, 2014 FLD2014-02002 — Page 2 ° Clearwater Level II Flexihle Develo ment lication Review FLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p Mp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DMSION � �s �rrk ?° ;R�>M1 . . , , building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The existing building footprint is 1,357 square feet and therefore less than 5,000 square feet. Furthermore, the greatest building length is 60 feet. As such, this provision is not applicable. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. As previously mentioned, the greatest building length dimension is 60 feet. Therefore, this provision is not applicable. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation (with elevation being defined as that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development) to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The application indicates compliance with this requirement along the east fa�ade facing Mandalay Avenue using existing windows and the proposed retracting door and fa� shutter. There are no architectural changes proposed on the south fa�ade facing Kendall Street. As this is a secondary fa�ade of approximately 130 square feet with limited visibility only form north bound traffic, staff supports only the painting of this fa�ade teal in color with no additional architectural embellishments required. Therefore, this provision is supported by the proposal. Section C.4 provides that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet will be occupied by a building. As the building height to midpoint of pitched roof is 12 feet, this provision is not applicable. Section C.5 requires that the height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. As previously mentioned, the proposal is for a change of use in an existing one-story building with no site development. Therefore, this provision is not applicable. Section C.6 permits buildings to be designed for a vertical or horizontal mix of permitted uses. The proposal is for a two uses; office and restaurant uses located in an existing one- story building. Therefore, this provision is met by the proposal. Section G addresses issues related to signage. A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. Section L addresses issues related to materials and colors. Finish materials and building colors are required to reflect Florida or coastal vernacular themes. The existing building utilizes a large expanse of windows on the east fa�ade. The windows coupled with the retracting door will provide architecture consistent with a coastal vernacular theme which prescribes the use of materials and design to allow natural light and air circulation. The building will be painted a teal color consistent with the Beach by Design color palette. Also, a faux shutter white in color and two lamp posts silver in color are proposed on the east fa�ade consistent with the coastal vernacular architectural style. While the applicant may adjust the color scheme any such adjustment would require Staff approval and must meet the requirements of this portion of the Design Guidelines. The proposed color scheme and material schedule meets the requirements of this section. Community Development Board — June 17, 2014 FLD2014-02002 — Page 3 ° Clearwater Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT � P APG DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � . . .. . . . .. . .:."�;. rm,�.°'2Yfr...,.,. , . . Development Parameters The existing building and site will remain unchanged. Therefore, as there will be no building additions or modifications to the existing site improvements, there will be no impact upon the F.A.R., I.S.R., minimum lot area, maximum building height and minimum setback development standards. The development proposal's compliance with those remaining applicable development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Minimum O�'f-street Parkin� Pursuant to CDC Table 2-803, the minimum off-street parking requirement is determined by the community development coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE manual standards. For comparative purposes, according to CDC Table 2-802 the minimum parking spaces required is three per 1,000 square feet for office use and between seven to 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet for restaurant use. This calculates to between six to nine parking spaces required for the proposal. The proposal continues to provide zero off-street parking spaces similar to many properties along Mandalay Avenue that do not have any on-site parking of their own. The subject property is located within walking distance of numerous motels, hotels and businesses within this area that rely on the existing metered on-street parking and metered parking lots. Most people park and then walk to businesses. The Beach Trolley also presently provides bus service from downtown to properties along Mandalay Avenue. Furthermore, the applicant provided a parking demand study with methodology approved by staff showing that the existing on-street and metered parking lot spaces are adequate to serve the office and restaurant parking demands. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Sections 3-201.D.1 and 3-903.I, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. There is existing mechanical equipment on the roof of the building not visible from public streets or abutting properties. Landscapin�: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D of the CDC, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. Since there is no parking lot on this property, there is no interior landscape area requirement. CDC Section 3-1202.E.2 requires foundation landscaping along the frontage of a building fa�ade facing a street right-of-way. The building fronts on Mandalay Avenue and Kendall Street, but due to its proximity to the front property lines, the applicant is unable to provide this required foundation landscaping. Many properties on both sides of Mandalay Avenue do not have any foundation landscaping. Solid Waste: The proposal will include 32-gallon refuse containers. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. SiQna� A sign package has not been included with the submittal. Any proposed signage will be required to meet the requirements of this section of Beach by Design and any applicable portions of the Community Development Code. ➢ Burden of Proof Community Development Board — June 17, 2014 FLD2014-02002 — Page 4 QClVta�itl�l Level II Flexible Develo ment lication Review PL.�rr�vG�nEVer.orMExT p �p DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION o��''k�i'.�t*A*• � �,e .... ...,; Section 4-206.D.4: Burden o�proof. The burden of_proof is upon the applicant to show bv substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to the approval re ueg sted. The applicant has adequately demonstrated through the submittal of substantial competent evidence that the request is entitled to the approval requested as required by CDC Section 4- 206.D.4. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal is supported by applicable various Goals, Objectives andlor Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan as follows: Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 1.0 0.99 Xl Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 1.0 Xl Minimum Lot Area N/A 1,374 square feet (0.03 acres) X1 Minimum Lot Width N/A 60 feet (Mandalay Avenue) Xl 22.9 feet (Kendall Street) Minimum Setbacks Front: South: N/A Zero feet (to building) Xt East: N/A Zero feet (to building) X' Side: North: N/A Zero feet (to building) Xl West: N/A Zero feet (to building) Xl Maximum Height N/A 12 feet (to top of flat roofl X� Minimum Off-Street Parking N/A zero spaces X'°Z I Figures reflect existing conditions on the site that are not being altered or approved by the proposed application. Z See analysis in Staff Report. Community Development Board — June 17, 2014 FLD2014-02002 — Page 5 ° Clearwater Level II Flexible Development Application Review i. : m Yx.,,,�,,. i ._ . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-803.D (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. 'The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an azea; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: 0 Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscane desim and annrotiriate distances between buildines. See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board — June 17, 2014 FLD2014-02002 — Page 6 Consistent Inconsistent X1 X� X' X' X' X� ' l�iL(�Fl 1'� tal�l Level.II Flexible Development Application Revie�u � . ...,�e,q;a. .. - � PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVlEW DMSION COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. T'he design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties. COMPLIANCE WITH BEACHBYDESIGNGUIDELINES: 1. Section A: Density. 2. Section B: Height. 3. Section C: Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings. 4. Section D: Setbacks. 5. Section: Street-Level Fa�ades. 6. Section F: Parking Areas. 7. Section G: Signage. 8. Section H: Sidewalks. 9. Section I: Street Fumiture and Bicycle Racks. 10. Section J: Street Lighting. 11. Section K: Fountains. 12. Section L: Materials and Colors. See analysis in Staff Report Consistent Inconsistent X X X X X X Consistent N/A X� X' N/A X1 N/A X' N/A N/A N/A N/A X' Inconsistent SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of Apri103, 2014, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 0.03 total acres is located at the northwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Kendall Street; 2. That the subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District and the corresponding Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; Community Developmeni Board — June 17, 2014 FLD20l 4-02002 — Page 7 ' 1��.cii rt aLel Level II Flexible .Qevelapment Apptication. Review PLn�xING � nEVELOrt�rrr DEVELOPMENT REV�W DIVISION +� .. . .......,.... . . ,. .. 3. That the subject property is located in the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; 4. That the property is currently being used as two office spaces within one building; 5. That the proposal includes a change of one tenant space use from office to restaurant with no site development proposed; 6. That there is no room on site for landscaping or off-street parking spaces; 7. That the proposal is generally in compliance with those applicable Design Guidelines set forth within Beach by Design; and 8. There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law: The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with uses found in the surrounding neighborhood; 2. That the development is consistent with the vision and intent of the Old Florida District of Beach by Design; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per CDC Tables 2-801.1 an� 2-803 of the Community Develapment Cude; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A; and 6. That the application is consistent with the requirement for the submittal of substantial competent evidence as per CDC Section 4-206.D.4. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to allow 418 square feet of Restaurant use in an existing 1,357 square foot building in the Tourist(T) District with a lot area of 0.32 acres (1,374 square feet), a lot width of 60 feet (along Mandalay Avenue) and 22.9 feet (along Kendall Street), front (east and south) setbacks of zero feet (to building), side (north and west) setbacks of zero feet (to building), zero parking spaces and a building height of 12 feet (to top of flat roo� as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2-803.D as well as a reduction to the required foundation landscaping area width from five feet to zero feet as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Community Development Code section 3-1202.G. subject to the following conditions: Conditions of A�proval: l. That the final design and color of the building be generally consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 2. That the outdoor seating be reviewed under a sepaxate Outdoor Cafe application; 3. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; 4. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development; 5. That application for a building permit be submitted no later than June 17, 2015, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to CDC Section 4-407; Community Development Board — June 17, 2014 FLD2014-02002 — Page 8 � View luuking wesl al lhe subjrcl properly View looking northeast View looking southeast View looking north View looking south View of the property immediately south of the subject property 600 Mandalay Avenue FLD20 t d-020�2 5 C�Jl4AJ, !T(�tVl Levet II �lex�ble Dev PLANNINGdc DEVEI.OPMENT �� 1 ��W DI:VIi1.OP\it.N'1'ItIiWIF:W OIVISION 6. 'C�at prior to the issuance of any buiiding perrnits, the location and visibility of electr'rc equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be shown to be painted the same color as the partiart af tl�e bui�ding to which such features are at�ached; and ?. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff '' Matt Jackson, Planner III A7"TACtiMENT. Plrotugcuphs and R�swne C��mtnunity I)evelupi�ii nt l��arcf June I�7. ?0 i�I I� I. U3q i 4-(12t)tl? 1',a�,e �) M�tthew .1ack.v�a 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, INlorida 33756 (727) 56r2-4504 matthew.iacks�►n aC�mvclwrwater.¢om PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ❑ Planner III February 2013 to present Ciry of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to varions City Boards and Committees. D Planner II Cily uf Cleurwuler, C'leur►vuler, Flvridu May 2011 tv Feb�zrury 2013 October 200$ rn Jurre 201 D Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, and variance. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of dcvclopmcnt plans and their campntibility with surroundings. lnterdepartmentul and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetinps. ❑ Planner I Calvin-Giordano and Associates, Fort Lauderdale, Florida May 2005 to December 2007 Project manager for various development applications such as plat, site plan, rezoning and variances. In-depth govemment agency, in-house and client coordination to ensure that the projects maintained submittal schedules stayed within budget constraints and attained approval. Schedule and lead project kick-off ineetings, ensure municipal project conditions were resolved, produce supporting documents and make site visits as well. Research and prepare due diligence reports including subject matter such as zoning, Iand uses, densities, available public utilities and land develnpment costs. Member of emergency mitigation cammittee formed to prepare and mitigate for natural or rnan-made diseaters affecting Calvin, Giardano and Associates a�id local municipatitics. o Manager Church Street Enterlainmenl, Orlando, Florida September 1999 to February 200� Supervised and managed daytime and nighttime operations of a bar and nightclub entertainment complex including ]00+ staff. Conducted hiring and training operations including security and inventory control. Managed and reconciled nightly gross revenues as well as preparing and delivering d�posits. Assisted in taking inventory and preparing weekly inventory orders, markcting and special events. o Linguist CIS Army, Fort Campbell, KY Uctober 19y1 to (Icto6er 1995 Maintain fluency in the Arabic ]anguage and knowledge of customs and culture as well as military readiness for possible deployments or training operations. Co-managed intelligence gathering operation in Haiti including coordination between multiple Special Forces units and civilian authorities. [nterpreter between U.S. and Egyptian soldiers during training exercises. Liaison between Special Forces battalions to coordinate certification training. EDUCATION o Mast�r of Arts, Urban and Regional Planning, Florida Atlantic University, 20U7 o Bachelor of Arts, Urban anc! Regional Planning, Rollins College. 2004 -� .. � JHECONSTRUCTION LLC 1121 Plaza Comereio Way N.E. S� Petersburg, FL 33'702 JosephHErwinLLC�a,tampabav. rr. com May 9, 2014 City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: 600 Mandalay Phone: (727) 480-5181 Fax: (72'n 217-9465 Cell Phone: (727) 48f�-5181 CGC015085 Attached are the Fle�cible Development Application with Outdoor Cafe Application, Land Survey, Landscape Application, Site Plan and Floor Plan. The Right A Way Application has been approved by the Engineer. The Asbestos Survey shows no asbestos and is on the Site. J ep . ne Contractor � Clearwater - °� �-�.. >°�.. y.�-�,.�-�..-� .�� .� ��.xw�� °��s"��'"�.._ ^�.� Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS Of PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOIDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALl APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVEIOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Xania, Inc. James �ampathakis MAILING ADDRESS: 1299 Main Street, Suite E, Dunedin FL 34698 PHONE NUMBER: EMAII: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Joseph H. Erwin MAILING ADDRESS: 1121 Plaza Comercio NE, St. Petersburg, FL 33702 PHONE NUMBER: 727-480-5181 EMAI�: JosephHErwinLLC@tampabay.rr.com ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 600 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 05-29-15-16362-007-0102 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: rlaanniatar Raarh Rav ��FnFT of Lot 10 Less 27 1 FT PROPOSED USE(S): Restaurant DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: ChangP nf l IsP from (�fficP tn RPStaiirant Specifically identify rhe request We request the rermoval of the required foundation pianting (include all requested code flexibility; e.g., reduction in required number of ___ parking spaces, height, setbacks, fot size, lot width, specific use, etc.J: Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 - Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPUCATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRiCT: Tourist - e: Resort HCH ' FUTURE LAND USE PI.AN DESIGNATIQN: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): OffiCe PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): Restaurant 418; OffiCe 703; COmmOn Use 241 SITE AREA: 1374 sq. ft. .03 GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: � �57 sq. ft. Proposed: 1357 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: 1357 sq. ft. acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there wiil be multiple uses): First use: 41R Dat_ CnnPV sq. ft. Second use: 703 Office sq. ft. Third use: 236Common sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: q� Proposed: .98 Maximum Allowable: ,95 BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1�` floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: ��57 sq. ft. ( 98 %a of site) Proposed: 1357 sq. ft. ( 98 % of site) Maximum Permitted: 1303 sq, ft. ( 95 % of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( 0 % of site) Proposed: � sq. ft. ( 0 % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 0 sq. ft. ( Proposed: � sq. ft. ( % of site) % of site) Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 ` � � IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 100% Proposed: 100% IVlaximum Permitted: g5% DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre) Existing: Proposed: Maximum Permitted: OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 0 Proposed: 0 Minimum Required: 4 to 8 BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: �2' Proposed: 12' Maximum Permitted: � 2' WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 30,000.00 ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY: North: Tourist South: Tourist East: OSR West: Tourist STATE OF FLORiDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this 8_ ___ day of representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my I<nowledge and authorize May -- °�� . to me and/or by City representatives to visit and photograph the Joseph H. Erwin __, who is personally I<nown has property described in this application. produced FL D E650-488-31=388=0 ,^_ as identification. . / �1 � /� i ) /7/!3 LC) � G ` �� l n o e of�property owner or representative Notary public, � My commission expires: �� 1�.3 �� AMY l. SCFIRAMEK � Notary PubBc� State of Fb�ida Commfeebr� FF 70251 My cortxn. explres Nov 13, 201 Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01112 Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. TF1PfP AI'P f10 Stfll(`t11P�I (`IlA11gPS tn flP I7IACIP tn tI1P PXtPI'InP (]f fI1P h111I(jlflg TiIP SI7P ri�rh apllpal anrl �rrhitorti ir � design are in harmony with the adjacent properties. The exterior of the building has been painted to comply with the 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ��- �.��- -• -• •o •i • .� , �• � ��- • • • .�- �- - • .• . -� .�• .�• • • � The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed restaurant will not chan e any elements of the neighborhood Openin and closin hours are the same as other businesses in the area. Therefore, there will be no adverse affect to health or safety of any person. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Thi� is a famil� rn��nPd and nnPratPri rP�taur^nt ThP Gtaff ��II tra��Pl �n tho ca�„o �niahirlo Thi� is nnt a flPCtinat�n restaurant. Customers will be residents of the beach or visitors to the beach. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The adiar.Pnt hiiildin� tn thP north is onP et�r� ��d framP r�n�triirti�n for reGiri nrP nc� thP huilriin� tn thP rPar is the same. The use has changed but not the construction. 600 Mandalay building is masonry building design for The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The hourG of o�ration are 7•00 AM to 10�00 PM Th G hnurG ara +ho �amo a� nthor „�e�o,;�„ ;,, �;; , o Th open outside seating will be a pleasant sight without loud music. The fiiter exhaust system will eliminate any Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 � Clearwater - �,��.�-�� ",�.��°�"�r'�.�""� �Kr ...., • �.,�..�...�°��F�.�.�� Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA fOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(5) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL �USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY). i. The proposed project, Detroit Coney Island, is an existing structure that has inescapable limitations that inhibit the ability to meet certain code requirements. The submitted design utilizes the available area to the highest and best use that enhances both property values and quality of life at the 600 block of Mandalay. � �- • •�• -• • • - • •� .�� .� - � � �- - � �- • •�-r 3. The use of this property is permitted under Beach by Design "Old Florida DistricY'. The proposed restaurant with seating capacity of 39 for persons that live in the area or are visiting the beach for other reasons. This will not properties. ' � - •. �- -� .... . ••.. � -• -u-. ..• .- . . - .u•. • - , � .• . -. .�• 5• a ThP �on�Pd i�sP is nPrmittPd in this ��ning di�tri�t h thP �n�sPd iiGP ��niild 6P si?nifir nt P��n�mi� contributor to city's economic base by creating jobs. c. The development proposal accommodates redevelopment characterized by other similar development where a rezoning would result zoning designation of restaurant. 6 a T��no�ed redevelopment ��ill not imr�Pde the normal and ord rl�r d v lopment �nd improv m nt of th surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district . b. The proposed redevelopment complies with building planes. The front of the building will have a 10' shutter that will open for outside seating and lamp post t�h��sanferm �e �eash Resagn e N�1 � Flexibility for the develorment is ��Gtified hy bPnPfit to C'IPan��at r BPa h The opening of the front section of restaurant will allow pedestrian to into the building and the outside seating _�A[jjj.prlhan___ra_a aaranra nf t ehuilriinc� :- .� �- • • �• �• �- - �• �.�t- .�• �- �- •� �. - •. . �• �. •-�� -• -• - Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtie Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12 . � , (`�1�� P#anning & Ue�clopment Department � l,� Flexib�e Deuelo�ment App�licativn ,, �,.�,�.-�,,,<w,.,�_.,-�,.:�„�._.,.� , , ' �'�' � ��" �; �`� �fftdavit fio Au��ori�e Atg�nt�Representati�e , ..� t i. Frovide narraes of ail property owners on deed - PFINT fuN names: Xania, tnc. James Lampathak�s ? Tt}at (f am/N�e �rej ti�e ntivr�erfsj ai,d �ecorci title hold�r(s} af the fc�llotiving descr,bed 6�raperty. �C1ii Ni�r7eial�y A4�nu�, EiearwaterBeach, FL 33i67 3 That this pcoperty canst�tutes the prpper�y ft�r whtch a request tor (describe request): Chan�e ot Use from Office to f�estaurant 1 Thar the �ande�signed (hasfh2ve} appointed antl (dc�es/doj appoint: Jc�s��h H.'Erwin - - - - - _ - - ... � _ . _..._ ----- ---- ------ ._�._�_.. ___ __-__ � _ _ ....- -- -- --- .. .,.. —_ _ _ ,._� _. as (hisJthe�rj �gent(s} ta e�ecute any;petitions or other dotuments necessary to affect such petit#or�; 5. That this affidavit has heen executed to induce the Gity of Clearwater; FlorFda to tvnsider and act on ihe a��ve d�scribed property; 6. Tftat site visits to the praperty are necessarp by City sepresentati�es in order to pro�es5 this application and the ow�'�er authorize5 City repre5entatives tt� visit ar�d pht�tograph the property deSC:rib�d in thris applit2tipr�; ik�a* i�1��=i, the unders�gned authority, heret�y cert;fy tt�at th� faregoing istrtte and correct A,�'�� e��/°,�. _ — ._._._�___ _ _ PrapertyQwrie ' Property OaJner _ m _. Property Owner Property �wner _ STATE (?� FLORIDA, CO�:NTY O� PINELL�S ----_ � I SEFOR� METHE UPtDERSiGNED, AN OFFICE� DULY C4A!lMISSiONEQ BY THE:t,RWS (3F THE STATE �F FLC?RiQA. OPt THIS _� � _ ` DAY OF �� _ _ _�Q�� ; PER$ONALLY APPEARED �� n f � y�� u�./ �.l WHp HAUIt�G S�EN FtRST DUI,Y SWORN _ � !� ' �!__ :.�._L--4,� -- - --- - - -- ' [�EPC?SED �L�t3 �AYS THA��NE FULLY UiVDERS NDS TNE ONTENTS C3F TH • FIRA�IT AT H SNE 51G ED. ; Q� � r�l � � � �'i�j C� i � ; � � ,,E�� an �.� J�o� �� ComMaior�f FF 61772 � N ary Pubi�C Signature � My comm. �Irae Oct 10. 2017 Natary ea . tamp h�ly Cammissia xpires v l,.�T� • ,�� p�� _ . _ , _._-- --- .- __ ___...--- ------------ " , 1 — ' — — ---� Ptanning &�eveloprtrent Oeparfinent,100 S: M}ntle Avenue, Clearwats�, FL 38Y'S6. 7e1: 727-862-d�;t; Fax: 72T-SS2-4865 Page,B of 8 Rsvised 01112 , � ��1 .`� �� Pl�nning & Qeveiopmenc Department � . , �-..;w.��..rti_,.^-,..w� Cam�rehe�s�ve Landscap�n� Appl�cation : �- *'' :"""�-�.�°�`'".a;�'",� � :✓=' 1T t5 IIVCIlMBEhIT UPON'THE APPttCAN7 TO SUBMtT Cf3MP{.ETE AND C{1RRE€T IfVFORMATit7M, ANY i�+l1SI,E,AUtNG,:DEC�P7iV�, i(VCU1VlP1ET£ OR fNCQ1iRECT fi+EFC1RMATIQN MAt� tRIVALIDAT� YOtlR APPIfCATION. ALL RPPLICATIQII4S ARE TfI SE FIlLfG3 Qi1T C011fIPLETELY AND COREiECTLY, AND SU�R/il'f7Eb I�i p�R50N (NO FAX 4R DEIIUERIES) T£} TFt€ F?tAIU�IENG & a�VELOPMEIYT DEPAF�TMENT BY NOON 4tV TItE SCHEQULEA REApL1NE DATE. A 70T,AL QF 11 COltItPIET� SfTS i7�F PkANS AND APPIItATIflN MATERlAES (1 ORttaINAL AN� 10 CQPlES� AS REQUtKEQ WiTHIIV ARE Tt3 BE SUSIVIiTiED �QR REVlEW BY TH£ DEVELOFNIENT REVt£W C�MMiT'FEE. SlI6SEC�UENi SUf3MITTAE FOR TME . :COMtitUNI'tY DEVfLOPItip.ENT BDARR, 1F ldEC:ESSARY, WILI R�L�UtRE i� Ct7MPLETE SETS UF PLAIUS AMD AflPLIGATION MATERIALS 41 ORIC�{NAL ANa 14 COP{ES). Pi.ANS ANi} ARPi,ICATfQNS ARE itEQUli2ED TO B� �OLtRTEA, STAPLED �4ND FOlL1EQ tMT� SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY �ItIN�i TlilS APPlfCAT10N, AC�REES TC} CpMRLY WITM ALt APpLIGABL� REQUIFtENtEhiTS Of 7HE COMMlJNl3i' DEVEiOi�ME1V1' COt7E. PROPERTY OWlVER (PfR DEEO}: Xaiti�, inC. Jan'teS l,afTfPBthakiS MAILING ADDRESS: 1299 it/iait� 5treet, Suite �, D4lnedin FL 3469$' ' PHQNE NUMB�R; E MI�kL: A�iEN7 t�R RE�'RESENTAI7VE; JQ58Ph H. Erwin nnai�ttvG a�t�RE55i 1121 Plaza Comereio N�, St, Patersburg, FL 33702 'PNd�lE NIJMBER: �27 �80 5181 6Mail: josephherwintkc@tampabay,rr.com -- -~ aL?DRESS OF SU:BIECT PitpPERTY�: 800 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwafer 8�ach, FL 33767 aESCRIP7tON OF REQllEST, We are requesting the rentavai a# the rEquired foundation plantin� Specrfrcerfly ideniijy the requesf (rnclude nPJ requested code flexibilrty; � e.g, re�uciron rn reqixired number of porking spoces, height, setbacks, lot srze, �ot width, specifit use, efc.J.� - STATE OF FLOREDA, COtiNTY f?f Pf1ekELLAS y�� T ' i, tne undersigned, acknowledge thaF a�l Swoen to and subscribed before me this �� day o# ; repre.se�tations' made in this applicatian' are true and � _�Y1c�.. .�na,or by � i accurate to ttre besfi Q# my knowtedge and authorize � , 1 City xepresentatir+es to visft and photograph the ��(� � , who is pers�onal3_�_kt�nvun has ' i praperty descritred in thi� apptication: produCed �_ r'7 f-��`%` as identification. � _ -- i _ - ��.-- D6�y___�ICd,��' ---- _ ��C_ Sigr�ati�re af operty owner ar representative otary public� �1 � My comrnis �on expire ; �� - � � �lJ / / ' i pta ''' nenartmpnt. 70Q 5. M rNe Avenue, Giearvvater, Ft 33P56, Teh TZT•5B�•456T; Faxc 727•S&2;i865 P 9 of 2 '- R2vised 07112 ��,� �� E Y. �Y� _ � � pUbNC, $fB�B Of FIOIIdB Comn�loM� FF 61772 ,, A�Y oomm. expNvt Oci 1Q ZQt7 : Clearwater Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAI. 1. Architectural Theme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. This is to request the removal of the foundation planting. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property Vafues. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01112 Detroit Coney Island & Budget Drapes Clearwater Beach Parking Demand Study INTRODUCTION The proposed Detroit Coney Island is a family owned and operated restaurant. The project is located at 600 Mandalay Avenue which is approved for 1,367 square feet of offices. We wish to develop 418 square feet for (Detroit Coney Island} restaurant use and 241 square feet of common area. The site is located on the west side of Mandalay Avenue. The site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking requirement of 7-15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of restaurant space and 4-5 spaces per 1,000 square feet for office space. According to strict interpretation of the Code, the proposed development would require 3 spaces for the ofFice and 6 spaces for the restaurant for a total of nine spaces. There is no room for off-street parking on the subject property. The Code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater beach. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. METHODOLOGY It was agreed 1HE Construction LLC would conduct a parking accumulation study of a Saturday between 11 am and 2pm and 6pm to 10pm as well as a Monday between 10am and 4pm ancl 6pm to 10pm. The study area included on-street parking along Mandalay Avenue from Royal Way to the north, Bay Esplanade to the east and Rockaway Street to the south. Municipal Lot 36, 37, 38 and 39 were also included for a combined total of 524 parking spaces within a 600 foot radius. FIELD ANALYSIS Parking lot counts were conducted between the hours of 10am and 2pm on Saturday March 1, 2014 and on Monday March 3, 2014 between the hours of 10am and 4pm and 6pm and 10pm. Weather conditions were typical for early March with a high temperature of 78 degrees and low of 65 degrees. No rain was encountered at any time during the study. The aforementioned parking areas were checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained for each specific parking area and the whole study area. It is important to note that spring break starts this week. SaturdaV March 1, 2014 On Saturday parking demand did not vary significantly throughout the study period with a low of 333 occupied spaces (63.5%) at 11am to a peak demand of 366 unoccupied spaces (69.8%) at 7pm. As such, there were a minimum of 158 unused spaces in the study area throughout the study period. Closer analysis shows spaces in Municipal Lots 36, 37, 39 and the on-street spaces on Kendall and Avalon Street were almost always full while Municipal Lot 38 and Mandalay avenue spaces were underutilized through the mid-day hours with spaces always available. Mondav March 3, 2014 On Monday parking demand varied slightly throughout the day from a low of 333 occupied spaces (63%) at 10am to a peak demand of 336 occupied spaces (69%) at 4pm. As such, there were a minimum of 188 unused spaces throughout the day. Again, a closer analysis shows Municipal Lots 36, 37 and on-street spaces on Kendall and Avalon Street were almost always full. However on Saturday Municipal Lots 37, 37 and 38 and Mandalay venue spaces were heavily used throughout the mid-day hours and occupied to early in the evening. CONCLUSION The redevelopment would require a maximum of nine off-street parking spaces by strict interpretation of Code Section 2-802. This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates of the 524 total parking spaces included in the study area, a maximum of 366 were occupied during any hour of the study period and a minimum of 158 spaces were available within 600 feet of the subject property. As such, adequate parking is available within reasonable walking distance of the project to support the reduction in off- street parking spaces. � ' 39 1'i �pa�ces * NORTH AREA SURVEY Nottosrale FOR PARKING 53 Spaces '' PROJECT LOCATION 145 $paces " � � U � � ' `i � 25 Spaaes 23 Spaces � � pIF� so 139 Spaces * � � �►7 � a � __ �:� _._ .i .,, - ZCAf'IJ 111/A1 Fl . . �� J��=` - � 65 Spaces" \` (closing s 2/1512(114 due ta construction) �\ " J�__ __ ___ __CITY PARKING LOTS __ � ! Hourly Rates � (Daily Rates) Hours of � No. ��aUon **Sat-Sun Enforcement Hours Mon-Fri & [Time Limit] � Seasonal � 30 Marina ;0.75 �1.00 ACTIVITIES No 25 Causeway Blvd. ONLY 8am-6pm Charge w�� [i Mr or Pertnit] Pier 60 $1.50 �2.00 7am-lam 31* 160 S. Guifview Bivd. (#10.00) (;1L50) [Daily Max.] Closed 32* 332 S. Guifview Btvd. �2.�5 (;16.Ot � 33* 212 Hamden Dr. ;1.00 Spaces " 34* 429 Mandalay Ave. ;1.00 � 35* 457 Mandalay Ave. #1.00 � 36* 4 Rockaway St. #1.00 � 37* Avalon - Kendali �1.00 6 Avalon St � I -- � Family Aquatic Center N I38* 8� Recreatlon Center �1.00 � 51 Bay Esplanade � 39 605 Mandalay Ave. •00 Gateway 43* 390/ 1 East Shore Dr. #1.00 $1.25 $1.25 �1.25 $1.25 �1.25 Closed Closed Closed (Mon-F�i) 8am-6pm No ;1.25 (Sat & HoHdays) Chan 12:30pm-6pm (Sun) �1.25 $1.25 � On Street Parking vanes - as postea on 41 Spaces �270 spaces) �1.00 �1.25 meters [Varies] * Aaepts - Vlsa/Master Card/American Express rw YlSA � rl � /�' ** Seasonal Rate - March through April everyday �= � Notes: - Dces not Include Handicap � � or Reserved Spaces ■� o(�qe - Informallon Subjed to V 8paces Private Parking Open to Public ,-. qt�,'�c�� Change � � � y � .�6 $r1HC@8 � J ' MARINA ACTIVITIES �EGEND; ONLY (Sam - Bpm) City Park � Public Beach City Parking Lot �� ,� Prlvate Parking Lot - Open to Public --v / Private Parking tiarage - Open to Public i --� �� On 8treet Parking � � Oversfze Vehlcle Parking (24'-40' on1Y) a General Parking Information V (727) 562-4704 � ~�y Parking System Hotline � CL �'�1q �yg 7,E (727� 562-48�2 L �o� � � � � HfIRBOI� " � ° Cle arwater w�' ;.�.�ry``� = U - m„w ; ; �,; e,.;,, � ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT wzvw. myClearwater. com/pa rking c � �� y � � °�J *`�- �� J il I IA1IJACIiNl' i S'1'ORY t7zAML' . ° I ' s7�ar�r°rr.tttr , N I S 89° 45' 41" E(M) t��o� 22.90'(D/C)—'�� I_,. � �"�. '. .1,'.. . �^� '�ii622� \ �� ':2 7 �': 5'i�: ��, o � q ;° � � �,> o�� ,,�� i °: � � �'� � O w c w O,,. � �, R � ' � Io v � � ' '��l ' Oi'c , v 28' �i2 � , �, : �i i > F ' C�� ) °' ✓' 'I t c•� � C.� � '.. CJ '`�'� ° i a W ,� i � . I �-�-� w w� ,O j�''j 2 0' '�'�q q o: U �n �� i w I ' i," " ? r� !Y� . .i� ~ �; O N ,:: � � O �� p p � d .� .� � I F . m ` ;�' . '' r„ \ ` , � i � Q " .`' O ' ;rn O iro I ,� � o M . 6 ' �` p ; � � , p � > � j _:._O 3_2 V ' o� O;� /.; '�, " W - 0 � � C/] i � _`.�/ 1 ---- --:. / , `22 3 . ;� � . a' j :iN/!J 2�G.9O r�v/M), SN/D i—. a. � N d9° 95' 41"W (.M) 0 0 � � I�.,�'N.�DALL �'T, � y � � O 40' � SECTION 5 TOWNSHIP 295. � RANGE 15E. .N SCA.LE: 1"=2� ° �h"�-1 t� �i �+ � �� '�i � SURVF_Y 0�: 7'I�E I'�S7' 22.9' OF THE SOUTH 60' OF LOT >0, DLOCIf 7, RL'VISL'D MA1' OI' CLEAI�W�TER BEACH �S RE.COfZDED IN PL�T BOOK 11 , P�GE(S) 5 , OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINEI_I_.�S COUNTY, FI_ORIDn — -- -- - _ __-- - ------ ---- - ----- �IRM 70Nf �� (BFE 1 1) °____ � PER PANEL � 12103C 0102G (9/03/03) ---- ___ _ __. _I �\U�/�� I' ,/`��U S��IV�C�i�V�l �'' lvl ��IJ\_��9 I_I .IJ�1�° 1 DUNEDINTF L.S3�698ET 727U734-3821 L DESCRIPTION �S PROVIDEI) BY CUFNL SURVEY TYPE DATE INV. N0. 2. SURVFY WAS PERFORMEU WITFIOUT E3[NFFI7' 0� �N A�STRACT OF TI7LE. DOUNT�ARY SURVTY 1�z9�2014 7014-124 3. OTI-IER TFIAN SHOWN ON ('LA'I, THIS FIRM IIAS MADF NO ATTEMPT TO RFSEARCH ------ -- INSTRUMENTS OF RECURD I�EFLECfWG Ef�S[MENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND/OR OWNERSIiIP TH�T MAY L•Xl;ii, BUT ARF NOl SHOWN ON 1"1115 SURVEY. - 4, NO UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMEN'fS WERF I.00�Tf_D. 5. PRINTED DIMENSIONS SIIOWN ON DRAWING SUPERCEDE SCAIED DIMENSIONS. ITEMS MAY �E DR�WN OUT Of SCA�L TO GRAPFIIC�ILY SIIOW ENCROACIIMCNTS AND/OR OVERLAPS. -- 6. USE Of iFIIS SURVEY [3Y �NYONF 011-IER TII�N TFIOSE 10 WI-IOM CERTIFIED WIL� BE AT TIIE RISI( OF TFIf RF-US[R, WITIIOUT LI�F3IUTY TO TFI.F. SURVEYOR. ----- -------- 7. ELEVnnoNS nRE OnsED oN NnvD i9ae UATUM, UNI_E55 OTHERWISF NO1FD. I NEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 5J-17.050 TO 5J-17.057_ (�. FOUND CORNERS II�VE NO IDENTIfYING CAP OR DISC, UNI.ESS OTHERWISE MOTED. qF ll-IE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ----- --_----------..._..___ _--.....----_---------- ---- ' FCM= FOUND CONCRf_Tf_ MONUMENT PCP- PERMANENT CONTROL POINT FIP= FOUND iRON F'IPC f�RM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT fPP= FOUND PINCFI PIPE CONC. = CONCRETE �' I FIR= FOUNO IRON ROp ESMi'.= FJ�SEMEMT �-^ � �'�'��'�° OJ `� �� "(� FN/b= FOUDID NAIL IM DISC ORN.= DR�INAGE � � SN/D= SEf N�IL IN UISC 67.7_5 (M) = ME�SURED (C) = CALCULATED LAR Y L. VA 1S JOHN C. BINDER � SIR= SET IRON ROD (t/2'� LRj�67_7_5 (P)= PI�T (D)= DFED FL REG. 0. 2937 FL REG. N0. 48II8 POL= POIN'f ON LINE '= F3FSRIN� �ASIS I_INE CEVSED BUSINESS No. 627_5 ENC.= [NCRO�CIi[S FIRM= FI.00D IMSURANCC RATE MAP LO = LICCNSED oUSiNESS BI=E = f)�SF FLOOD EIFVATION (SURVEY INVAUD WITFIOU7 SIGNAI"URE AND FMBOSSED SE�L) � DE JA�iG 9'-O�� E I;� � I� � r � c i r , @ ' 20 MIN RATED DOOR X � 9' SIDELUALK 21'-2 31/32�� 40" TABLES OUTSIDE SEATINC� FeeRUaR. is, zoi4 RIC4-IARD A JACsER DETROIT GONEY ISLAND Joseph H. Erwin Construction L�C ��OO� �L�u 1121 Plaza Comercio Way NE ARGNITEGT AR-00110031 600 MANDALAY AvE St. Petersburg, FL 33702 PO BOX S88 GLEARWATER BEAGH, FL 33�6'i I SCALE li4"=! C@II:%27-4SO'S�H� ST. PETERSBURCs, FL 33�31 I Fax: 727-217-9465 (�2�) 825 0001 � JosephHErwinLLC@TampaBay.RR.com : . , , y �., � . ( i , .- � � . � � .� � CJ � �� `�!I/,G/i�� J�/,r��iy9 . � "�.1� � .�#t,�yM . S a�' �+i"�Z �� • y � �°�� '��S � �� ,� . , .; -r ��i'y�t /ml/�/�/ �1� ii /�? � „Z'w� �/ �r,'��p�.�r��bp�x ., ln?�� aa%5�„ .