Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2014-02003
, � 1 �r������ _��a .t : -�,' ��'�'�`_�`"�..�' v `e.v- _. ''°.�.•°�•._ s "�+;�:r_-*4..:.,-' MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM: CASE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT April 15, 2014 G.1. FLD2014-02003 REQUEST: Flexible Development application for an 88,867 square foot warehouse facility in the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District with a lot area of 163,378.3 square feet, lot widths of 430 feet (along Calumet Street) and 380 feet (along Hercules Avenue), front (north) setbacks of 29 feet (to waWpavement) and 34.9 feet (to building), front (west) setbacks of 12.6 feet (to concrete pad) and 23 feet (to building), side (east) setbacks of 4.6 feet (to proposed solid waste enclosure) and 50.1 feet (to building), side (south) setbacks of 50 feet (to pavement) and 75 feet (to building), a building height of 43.5 feet (to top of flat roo fl, and ten off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 1304.C., Community Development Code, as well as a reduction in the width of the north and west foundation planting areas to zero feet where five feet is required; to eliminate the required interior landscaping; and a reduction to the number of required trees in the south perimeter landscape buffer from 12 trees to 9 trees as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G., Community Development Code. GENERAL DATA: Agent ............................. Daniel0'Farrell Applicant/ Owner .. .. ........... Church of Scientology LoCation ............................ 2005 Calumet Street; located at the southeast corner of the Hercules Avenue and Calumet Street Property Size ..................... 3.75 acres (163,3783 square feet) Future Land Use Plan......... Industrial Limited (IL) Zoning ........................... Industrial, Research & Technology Adjacent Zoning. Existing Land Use.. (IRT) District North: Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District South: Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District East: Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District West: Industrial, Research & Technology (IRT) District .......... Warehouse Facility/Storage Proposed Land Use.......... Warehouse Facility/Storage ' li�l.�t ��ttll�� Level II Flexible Development Application Review ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The subject property currently consists of two single-story masonry buildings with a combined 6,793.9 square feet. The larger structure was previously used as a call center while the smaller structure was used a parking garage. Both buildings will be demolished as a part of the redevelopment of the property. The property has direct access to Hercules Avenue and Calumet Street. Properties to the west across Hercules Avenue (within unincorporated Pinellas County) consist of commercial uses such as an automobile service station and retail sales and services. The property to the north consists of a warehouse while the property to the south is a used car dealership, and the property to the east is used as a printer and sign shop. Development Proposal: The owner intends to build a single-story 88,867 square foot warehouse on the subject 3.75 acre property. Although the subject property is 3.75 acres only 3.275 acres are buildable due to a 50 foot wide utility and drainage easement (21,500 square feet of area) along south property line. The building will have a front (north) setback of 34.9 feet along Hercules Avenue and a front (west) setback of 23 feet along Calumet Street. The building will be 43.5 feet in height. It will use permanent concrete tilt-wall construction and will be painted light, bright colors or white and off-white base. The site plan shows that a total of ten parking spaces and two loading spaces will be provided on-site. The warehouse will be used for record storage. The facility will be staffed with between three to eight employees that will operate in two shifts throughout the day and night; however, the total number of employees on site at any one time will not exceed 15 employees. The on-site traffic circulation plan proposes a gated one-way entrance from Calumet Street. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 2 of 12 ° p p }p�. PLANI�IING & DEVELOPMENT :� l.�l ��141 Level II Flexible Development Application Review DEVELOrMExz �v�w nrviscox J . ... .�. .. .. "t.�`; . .. . The plan shows that there is adequate stacking space (40 feet) from the right-of-way to the gate. Once on site, the vehicles wil� drive along the south side of the building to the parking area. If any vehicles are driving through, they will continue on the driveway along the east side of the building to a one-way exit onto Hercules Avenue. This request is being reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project because the front (west) setback is less than the 20 feet required for a warehouse use and that a warehouse facility with 88,867 square feet of gross floor area requires 133 parking spaces while only ten spaces are proposed to be provided on-site. In place of required parking spaces, the owner will provide private bus and shuttle van system for the employees at this facility. The same transportation system utilized for the employees at the owners other warehouse located directly north of the subject property at 2000 Calumet Street will be available to employees of the new facility. The proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Special Area Plan: N/A Development Parameters Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-1301.1, the maximum allowable FAR for properties with a FLUP designation of Industrial Limited (IL) is 0.65. The proposed FAR is 0.63, which is consistent with this Code provision. Im�ervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2- 1301.1, the maximum allowable ISR for properties with a FLUP designation of IL is 0.85. The proposed ISR is 0.85, which is consistent with this Code provision. Minimum LotArea and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum lot area and width requirements for warehouse facility are 20,000 square feet and 200 feet, respectively. The subject property has a lot area of 163,378.3 square feet (3.75 acres) and lot width of 430 feet along Calumet Street and 380 feet along Hercules Avenue. The proposal is consistent with these criteria. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, there are no minimum setback requirements for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum front setback requirement for warehouse facility is 20 feet while the minimum side setback is 15 feet. Specific to this project are front (north) setbacks of 29 feet to wall and 33.9 feet to building, front (west) setbacks of 12.6 feet to concrete pad and 23 feet to building, side (east) setbacks of 4.5 feet to solid waste enclosure and 50.1 feet to building, and side (south) setbacks of 50 feet to pavement and 75 feet to building. Each proposed setback meets code. The concrete pad setback of 12.6 feet from the front (west) setback is for outdoor mechanical equipment. Mechanical pads and equipment are considered accessory structures which are not permitted in front of the primary building as set forth in CDC Section 3-201. For this reason, it is attached as a condition of approval that the two outdoor mechanical concrete pad locations Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 3 of 12 � C�����[i141 Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PL`�nr�G&DEV�LOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �� � ��.. .,:� �- � within the front (west) setback must be removed and/or relocated to an appropriate area in the side (south) yard or side (east) yard or on the roof. The solid waste enclosure is 4.6 feet from the side (east) property line. Its location is related to traffic circulation on site and based on the code provision that no wall shall be built within any easement (CDC Section 3-806). City vehicles can easily access the enclosure based on its location. The location should not negatively affect the adjacent property. Maximum Buildin� Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, there is no maximum allowable height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the maximum building height for warehouse facility is 50 feet. The proposed height of the building addition is 43.5 feet (to top of flat roo fl. The proposed building height is less than the Code provisions. Minimum Off-Street Parkin�: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-1304, the minimum required parking for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards. The minimum off-street parking requirement for warehouse facility uses is 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area which requires the applicant to provide 133 parking spaces on site. The site plans show that ten parking spaces will be provided on site with two loading spaces, one space for each loading dock. These off-street parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with the standards set forth in CDC Section 3-1402. A parking demand study was required to justify the reduction in off-street parking. The parking demand study found that ten parking spaces will be adequate for this facility because it is the policy of the applicant that private bus and shuttle van service be provided for the warehouse employees (a maximum of 15 employees may be on site at one time). The same parking solution was proposed for a similar project at the owner's property located directly to the north of the subject property. In 2011, the applicant's existing warehouse located at 2000 Calumet Street was approved by the CBD to expand from 59,943 square feet to 71,943 square feet by adding a 12,000 square foot building addition. This warehouse consists of mail processing, motor pool and vehicle maintenance, central laundry, books, CD's, DVD's, records archives and Parishioner records. In effect, more intensive uses then the proposed file storage facility. The additional building square footage was to increase the floor area for additional record storage. This development was not started; however, the request required 105 parking spaces where 12 spaces were being provided. The 2011 parking demand study found the most heavily used parking occurs on weekdays with a maximum of four parked vehicles. On a typical day there was an average of 14 staff inembers in the facility at the various job functions. The study stated that employees arrived by three means of transportation which are private bus service, private van service or bicycle. The Church's bus system was to be used as the primary means for the staff to arrive and depart at this facility. This development proposal will result in the relocation of the record storage and its associated employees from the warehouse at 2000 Calumet Street to the new facility. The applicant states that the employees will be transported by private shuttle van service to and from the new facility. The vans will utilize the parking spaces provided on site. If bus service is necessary the Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 4 of 12 r i.ri4t�� 1'Ct�1��1 Level II Flexibie Develo ment A lication Review PLnxx�rrG& nEVaLOrMENr P PP DEVELOPMENTREVIEWDIVISION � �,a � � . employees may be picked-up or be dropped-off at the facility at 2000 Calumet Street which provides five scheduled buses between the hours of 9:30 AM and 7:40 PM. Based on the findings, the number of proposed parking spaces is acceptable by staff. Mechanical Ec�uipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened on four sides by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation from view from public streets and abutting properties. As previously discussed, the two outdoor mechanical concrete pad locations within the front (west) setback must be removed andlor relocated to an appropriate area in the side (south) yard or side (east) yard. Mechanical pads and equipment are considered accessory structures which are not permitted in front of the primary building as set forth in CDC Section 3-201. The mechanical equipment can be located on the roof as long as it is located to be screened from view from the public right-of-way at street level from adjoining properties. If screening is provided, any materials used shall be consistent with those used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building. Si�ht Visibility Trian��: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the proposed driveways on Calumet Street and Hercules Avenue, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and been found to be acceptable. Any groundcovers planted within the sight visibility triangles will need to be maintained to meet the Code requirements. Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-912, all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. Electric and communication lines for this development shall be installed underground on-site in compliance with this requirement. The applicant shall provide documentation from the utility companies if undergrounding the existing overhead utility lines within the public right-of-way along Calumet Street and Hercules Avenue is impractical. If is determined that the overhead wires can be placed underground, then provisions for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of-way must be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1., this site is required a five-foot wide south perimeter landscape buffer with one tree every 35 feet. The south landscape perimeter buffer exceeds five feet in width and consists of a number of shade trees and accent trees. Review of the landscape plan and grading and drainage plan shows that there are four live oaks and four crape myrtle trees within the buffer. The applicant wants to preserve the trees. They also propose to plant six accent trees (three winter cassia and three crape myrtles) in the buffer. According to CDC Section 3-1202.B.1, two accent trees equal one shade tree; therefore, the existing four live oak tree plus ten accent trees equal nine trees that will be in the buffer where twelve trees are required. Staff has no objection to the addition of six accent trees on the northern top of bank as they should not impede existing flow patterns; however, trees should be limited in the flowlines of stormwater systems/drainage easements so that they may continue to operate and be maintained in the same manner. Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 5 of 12 `�� t�'�`4� Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT p Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION U . . . ir . p`{.,Fyl. k 5 . . � Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2., this site is required a to provide a minimum five-foot wide foundation landscaped area along any side of the building that fronts a street right-of-way with a minimum of two accent trees or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. The proposed building has two fronts on along Calumet Street (north) and the other along Hercules Avenue (west). The west and north sides of building require foundation plantings provided for 100 percent of a building facade as noted above. However, the dry ponds will be located along the base of both front building facades which prevents the installation of the required foundation planting buffer. The theoretical foundation landscape buffer width would be approximately 1,765 square feet along Calumet Street which would require 88 shrubs for one shrub every 20 square feet. To mitigate for the north buffer width deficiency, the applicant has added 95 shrubs to the north perimeter landscape buffer. The theoretical foundation landscape buffer width would be approximately 1,350 square feet along Hercules Avenue which would require 67 shrubs to comply with one shrub every 20 square feet. To mitigate for the west buffer width deficiency, the applicant has added 84 shrubs to the west perimeter landscape buffer. The overall result is 24 shrubs over the total number of shrubs required have been provided. In regards to required foundation landscape trees, the landscape plant schedule indicates that a total of 25 accent trees (winter cassia) will be used towards foundation landscape trees. These trees will be added in each landscape perimeter buffer to mitigate for the deficient foundation landscape buffer. The landscape plan also shows that 21 palm trees out of the 33 palm trees to be used towards the foundation landscape buffer are to be planted in the north and west retention ponds. The 21 trees will be planted more than six inches below top of bank which is not permitted because such trees affect the flowline of the ponds and are problematic in the operation of the maintenance of the pond. For this reason, these trees shall be removed from the retention ponds to be relocated on the property to meet code. Since the mechanical equipment pads need to be relocated, this greenspace area can be used to relocate trees. The landscape plan also shows that three bald cypress trees are to be planted in the retention pond in the west landscape perimeter buffer. These trees will be planted more than six inches below top of bank. As discussed above, trees planted below six inches or more the top of bank affect the flowline of the ponds can be problematic in the operation and maintenance of the pond. For this reason, these trees shall be removed from the retention pond and be relocated on site. In regards to the relocation of trees, it shall be a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permit, a revised landscape plan be submitted to be reviewed by Staff to ensure the palm trees and cypress trees are removed from the retention ponds and relocated on-site to comply with code. The vehicular use area for this development is 21,940 square feet. This area consists of the parking area, loading area and driveway along the south and east side of the building. Due to the on-site traffic circulation system the applicant does not want to provide the standard parking lot interior islands as set forth in CDC Section 3-1202.E.1. They propose a 15-foot wide landscape buffer along the west side of the driveway along the east side of the building that is 3,750 square feet of green space in-lieu of the standard parking lot interior islands. This buffer will consist of six accent trees (crape myrtles), twelve palm trees (sable palms), and three shade trees (bald Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 6 of 12 ' L,il\.i4� 11' �ll.l Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �:�° _. _ � � � cypress). The buffer will also be fully landscaped with shrubs (pink muhly and simpson stopper) and groundcovers (Asiatic jasmine). Also, the VUA would require 2,194 square feet of green space in the parking lot (ten percent of VUA). The plan shows there is 3,750 square feet of green space which provides an additional 1,556 square feet of green space within the buffer where 2,194 square feet is required. Based on the buildable area limitations, location of parking area, and code complaint traffic circulation system, Staff has no objection to the elimination of the interior island requirement for this project. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.C, it shall be a condition of approval that automatic permanent irrigation system providing complete water coverage for all required and other landscaping materials shall be installed and be maintained as a fully functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition or submit evidence that an irrigation system exists that will provide complete water coverage for the new landscaping. The site is proposing the maximum practical landscaping improvements and is focusing landscaping improvements in those areas that are most visible: the front (west) and front (north) buffers. The landscaping in the north and west perimeter landscape buffers will be thicker and lusher than the standard landscape buffer requirement with the addition of the foundation landscape shrubs and trees. All proposed plant material shall be Florida Grade No. 1 or better. The proposed landscaping will be a significant improvement, is the m�imum practicable, and is supportable. It is noted that there are low overhead wires in the public right-of-way along Calumet Street. It is a condition of approval that the applicant shall submit documentation from the utility companies if undergrounding the existing overhead utility lines within the public rights-of-way along the Calumet Street and Hercules Avenue is impractical. If it is determined that the overhead wires cannot be placed underground, then the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that replaces any proposed shade trees in the north perimeter landscape buffer along Calumet Street with accent trees as set forth in CDC Section 2-1202.B. where one accent tree equal one shade tree when located under overhead wires. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Comprehensive Landscape Program as per CDC Section 3-1202.G: Consistent IInconsistent l. Architectural theme. a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in X the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X automatically controlled so that the lighting is tumed off when the business is closed. 3. Community character. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values. The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 7 of 12 ' Vi�ui �7�1��i• Level II Flexible Develo mentA lication Review PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION J ,.. 'ATM .ti{? . Consistent � Inconsistent 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the NA NA comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel nronosed for development is located. Solid Waste: The location of the dumpster on the southeast side of the building has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si�: A formal signage package has not been presented at this time. Any signage package must meet Code requirements. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Compliance cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of the Industrial Limited (IL) future land use plan category and the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District as per CDC Section 2-1302 and Table 2-1304: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent FAR 0.65 0.63 X ISR 0.85 0.85 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 163,3783 sq. ft. (3.75 acres) X Minimum Lot Width N/A Calumet: 430 feet X Hercules: 380 feet Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A North: 29 feet (to pavement) X 34.9 feet (to building) West: 12.6 feet (to concrete pad) X 23 feet (to building) Side: N/A South: 50 feet (to pavement) X 75feet (to building) East: 4.6 feet (to enclosure) X 50.1 feet (to building) Maximum Height 50 feet 43.5 feet (to flat roof ) X Minimum Determined by the 10 spaces with 2 loading spaces X* Off-Street Parking community development coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards *see minimum off-street parking section for discussion Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 8 of 12 ' v,l\.Nl 1��'[�1�41 Levei II Flexible Development Application Review u. . . ""�` .. . . � ... PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-1304.D. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ❑ Changes in horizontal building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ❑ Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; ❑ Building step backs; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape desi�n and appropriate distances between buildinQS. Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 9 of 12 Consistent I Inconsistent X X X X X X ' 1��4[�� ►C �Ll.l Level II Flexible Development Application Review U .. . , �' :�2A " . . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Consistent Inconsistent X X X X X X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of March 6, 2014 and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient, based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 3.75 acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Calumet Street and 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Hercules Avenue; That the subject property is located within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District and the Industrial Limited (IL) Future Land Use Plan category; The subject property has a lot area of 163,378.3 square feet (3.75 acres), a lot width of 430 feet (along Calumet Street) and 380 feet (along Hercules Avenue); The subject property is 163,378.5 square feet of lot area only 141,188.5 square feet of the lot area is buildable due to a 50 foot wide utility and drainage easement (21,500 square feet of area) along southern property line; The maximum allowable FAR is 0.65, the proposed FAR is 0.63; The maximum allowable ISR is 0.85, the proposed ISR is 0.85; The development project proposes demolishing all existing structures on site to build a 88,867 square foot warehouse; The warehouse will be used for record archives storage; The building will be 43.5 feet in height (to flat roo�; The 88,867 square foot warehouse facility requires 133 parking spaces; The owner will provide ten parking spaces and two loading spaces on-site; That the parking lot will not consist of landscape interior islands; The submitted parking demand study demonstrates that ten off-street parking spaces will be adequate for parking needs for the warehouse facility during all periods of hours of operation since the Church's private bus and shuttle van system is the primary means for the staff to arrive and depart at this facility; and, 14. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 10 of 12 ' Ll4�ll ►t ttl��+l. Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLa�rr�v� & DEV�LOrMExT P PP DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � _ .,. �,_ � �� Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-1301.1 and Table 2-1304 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2- 1304.0 of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-914.A of the Community Development Code; and, 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program standards as per Section 3-1202.G. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of this Flexible Development application for an 88,867 square foot warehouse facility in the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District with a lot area of 163,378.3 square feet, lot widths of 430 feet (along Calumet Street) and 380 feet (along Hercules Avenue), front (north) setbacks of 29 feet (to walUpavement) and 34.9 feet (to building), front (west) setbacks of 12.6 feet (to concrete pad) and 23 feet (to building), side (east) setbacks of 4.6 feet (to proposed solid waste enclosure) and 50.1 feet (to building), side (south) setbacks of 50 feet (to pavement) and 75 feet (to building), a building height of 43.5 feet (to top of flat roo fl, and ten off-street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C., Community Development Code, as well as a reduction in the width of the north and west foundation planting areas to zero feet where five feet is required; to eliminate the required interior landscaping; and a reduction to the number of required trees in the south perimeter landscape buffer from twelve trees to nine trees as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3-1202.G., Community Development Code, subject to the following conditions: Conditions of A� rp oval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be generally consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the property owner shall provide a signed and notarized document, having previously been recorded in the Official Records of the Pinellas County Clerk of the Court, stating that they shall provide a continued bus service with a minimum of five scheduled buses between the hours of 9:30 AM and 7:40 PM at the 2000 Calumet Street property that can be utilized by any warehouse employee; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted to be reviewed by Staff to ensure the palm and cypress trees are removed from the retention pond and relocated on-site; 4. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the two outdoor mechanical concrete pad locations shall be removed from the front (west) setback and relocated to an appropriate area in the side (south) yard or side (east) yard or on roof; 5. That any mechanical equipment on the roof shall be located to be screened from view from the public right-of-way at street level from adjoining properties. If screening is provided, the materials used shall be consistent with those used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building shall be utilized and approved by Staff; Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 11 of 12 r V�41�� 17�1�1-1 Level II Flexible Develo ment A lication Review PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT P Pp DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION � �-� . , , ._, ,,,.. 6. That the proposed solid waste enclosure match the building with regard to fit, finish and materials and that evidence of same be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all utilities including individual distribution lines must be installed underground ttnless such undergrounding is not practicable. The applicant shall provide documentation from the utility companies if undergrounding the existing overhead utility lines within the public right- of-way along the Calumet Street and Hercules Avenue is impractical. If it is determined that the overhead wires can be placed underground, then provisions for the future undergrouriding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of-way must be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy; 8. That if the overhead wires cannot be placed underground, then the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that replaces any proposed shade trees in the north perimeter landscape buffer along Calumet Street with accent trees as set forth in CDC Section 2- 1202.B.; 9. That an automatic permanent irrigation system shall be provided for complete water coverage for all required and other landscaping materials and maintained as a fully functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition; 10. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy all of the proposed landscaping shall be installed; 11. That any future signage shall meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff; 12. That issuance of a development permit by the City of Clearwater does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the City for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law; 13. That all other applicable local, state and/or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development; 14. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Fire Department may require the provision of a Water Study performed by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure that an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of the project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe andlor fire pump. If a fire pump is required, then the water supply must be able to supply 150 percent of its rated capacity; 15. That prior to the issuance of any building permits the location and visibility of electric equipment (electric panels, boxes and meters) be reviewed and, if located exterior to the building where visible from any street frontage, be shown to be painted the same color as the portion of the building to which such features are attached; and, 16. That prior to the issuance of any permits, all Engineering, Environmental, Land Resources, Parks and Recreation, Solid Waste, Stormwater and Traffic Engineering conditions be met. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: Kevin W. urnberger, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board — April 15, 2014 FLD2014-02003 — Page 12 of 12 Looking east along Calumet Street (2000 Calumet Street warehouse on left). \\\ - { � ,iE':i, .y9", Looking east from Hercules at 2000 Calumet Street warehouse. ___---- .�. -----"" -�y i �____---- ,--,=,--/ . _ .�_ Looking at subject property from west side of Hercules Ave. ' „�� "k`` N^e,°� aws;x..i�'.'� , � Y�} �� �� Looking south at subject property from north side of Calumet Street. _ �� Looking east along Calumet Street at subject property � � ill��� ° __-_ s.�.,� __ _. . . f_ -�a�� ��� ' ��� �r_T � �'�� — - _ i ...�.._ ....-��*_°: �1F°�'r° � . � t� �� � °r.'` . `�x J, �' . z !" J�r� xrA .'�� l :p �� ''W,,t,g, '' ha -•?r-� �,'_ �' k�`�a. �".; "`,? �'� . Commercial uses at Calumet St. and Hercules Ave. intersection on west side of Hercules Ave. 2005 Calumet Street FLD2014-02003 Kevin W. Nurnberger 100 S Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4567ext2502 kevin.nurnberger(�a,m,yclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III March 2011 to present Planner II October 2010 to March 2011 City of Cleanvater, Cleanvater, Florida Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Planner County of York, Yorktown, Virginia 2007 to 2009 Reviewed residential, commercial and mixed use development site plans to ensure compliance with planning, zoning, subdivision, historic preservation, and environmental standards as well as design criteria, specifications, regulations, codes and ordinances. Led pre-application meetings with residents, neighborhood organizations, contractors, and developers regarding future projects which included state and local government agencies. Site Assistant Gahan and Long Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland 2006 to 2007 Enforced Article 3 of the Planning Order (NI) with land owners, developers and district councils on procedures relating to archaeological and built heritage remains on proposed development sites. On site assistant to project manager during the archeological process throughout the pre-development stage. Development Planner Versar Inc, Fort Story/Fort Eustis, Virginia 2005 to 2006 Developed survey strategies for the Cultural Resource Manager by reviewing local and state planning documents, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning on Federal installations, the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, the Virginia Department of Transportation plan, and Virginia Power's public utility plan in the predevelopment stages of new development and building expansion projects to ensure protection of historic properties. City Planner City Planning Commission, New Orleans, Louisiana 2000 to 2005 Primary subdivision planner assisting applicants throughout the subdivision process in accordance with the zoning and subdivision regulations of the City of New Orleans. Reviewed various zoning and conditional use applications. Prepared and presented staff reports to the City Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments. EDUCATION University of New Orleans, LA MA Urban and Regional Planning (2004) State University of New York at Buffalo, NY BA Anthropology (1999) CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FL'A�SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC. 14 March, 2014 Mr. Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: FLD2014-02003 - 2005 Calumet Street Dear Mr. Nurnberger, Please accept our revised application to CDB for a new record storage warehouse with reduced parking requirement. This application consists of: (15) DRC Comment Response Letter (15) Application with Written Submittal Requirements attached (15) Comprehensive Landscape Application (15) Property deed (1 S) Stormwater Drainage Calculations (15) Boundary Surveys are included in the Civil Plan Sets and 2 Boundary Survey original embossed are includecl (15) Site Plans and Landscape Plans in full sets 24x36 (15) building elevations (15j Building renderings showing intended colors and signage (15) 2014 (Current) Parking Study and 2011 Parking Study If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to email or call 423-3007. Sincerely. anie 'Farrell Landlord Church of Scientology 503 CLEVELAND STREET • CLEARWATER • FLORIDA • 33755 727-638-9088 • FAX 727-445-7277 C� � Kimley-Horn � and Associates, Inc. March 13, 2014 Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department P.O. Box #4748 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Case No.: FLD2014-02003: - 2005 CALUMET ST Our Ref: 148128033 Dear Mr. Nurnberger: The following is in response to your DRC review comments dated March 3, 2014. Your requests are highlighted in bold text with our responses following. ENGINEERING REVIEW Prior to Communitv Development Board: 1. As per Community Development Code Section 3-1701B, Sidewalks required, Plan considerations, if the remodeling of an existing structure will exceed by 50% of the assessed evaluation of the property where a sidewalk does not exist, an applicant shall provide for construction of a sidewalk in an easement or right-of-way. Please provide sidewalk in the Hercules Avenue right of way. Response: Per discussion witli DRC staff, this project will not provide a sidewalk along Hercules Ave. The owner will provide an in-lieu of payment. 2. Driveway aprons shall not extend beyond the property line as per City Index 103 page 2 of 2. Please re-consider the location of the northwest property as it encroaches on the adjacent property. Response: Please refer to the Site Plan, Sheet CS-100 for revised driveway apron alignment geometiy. 3. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or ■ Suite 200 2601 Cattlemen Roatl Sarasota, Floritla 34232 TEL 941 379 7600 C� Kimley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 2 � � and Associates, Inc. wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Response: See notes on sheet CU-100 requiring the underground water mains and hydrants to be installed, completed aud in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Deparhnent requirements. Prior to Buildin� Construction Permit: 1. Please provide the following notes to the plans: --All utilities shall be cut and capped prior to demolition. The Wastewater Supervisor shall be notified. --All existing utilities shall be protected during demolition. --Demolition shall not cause any service interruptions for other utility customers. --Water meters, double-detector checks and backflow preventers are owned by the City of Clearwater. The City shall remove and retain these items. Response: The above notes have been added to sheet CD- I 00. 2. A City of Clearwater right of way permit from the Engineering Department shall be required prior to any construction in the Calumet right of way. Response: A note requiring the contractor to obtain a right of way permit prior to construction has been added to sheet CS-100. 3. Please show how the 50-foot City utility and drainage easement will be accessed once the aluminum fence is installed. Response: Existing access is maintained in the proposed design from the driveway off of Hercu(es, outside of the proposed fence. See note on sheet CS-100 for clarification. Prior to Certificate of Completion: 1. A Pinellas County right of way permit will be reyuired prior to CO for any work in the Hercules Avenue right of way. Response: A note requiring the contractor to obtain a right of way permit prior to construction has been added to sheet CS-100. General Notes• 1. Only Sheets CS-100 and CU-100 were reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been G_� Kimley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 3 � and Associates, Inc. necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. Response: Acknowledged 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged ENVIItONMENTAL REVIEW Prior to issuance of Buildin� Permit: 1. Provide erosion control measures on plan sheets and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. Response: See sheet CG-250 for erosion control measures and details. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62-621(2). Response: Please refer to the note on the Erosion Control Plan, Sheet-250. 3. Additioaal permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Response: Acknowledged FIRE REVIEW l. Must Comply with Ordinance No. 47.053 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. � Response: The owner acicnowledges and confirms that the building will comply with ordinance #47.053. G-� Kimley-Horn Kevin Nurnberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 4 � and Associates, Inc. 2. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states No Parking, Fire Department Connection provide address on sign to indicate what building it supplies and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2010 edition. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDS. Response: Acknowledged. See revised sheet CS-] 00 for FDC location & notes, and sheet LP-l00 for revised landscaping o provide 7.5' clearance. 3. Must meet the requirements of NFPA-1, 2009 edition (Florida) 18.2.3.5.3 Fire lanes shall be marked with freestanding signs with the wording NO PARKING FIRE LANE BY ORDER OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT or similar wording. Such Osigns shall be 12 inches by 18 inches with a white background and red letters and shall be a maximum of seven feet in height from the roadway to the bottom part of the sign. The signs shall be within sight of the traffic flow and be a maximum of 60 feet apart. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged. See sheet CS-100 for fire sign location and note regarding signage detail. 4. Plan shows gates, must provide County Knox Pad Lock or County Knox Electric Key Switch with battery backup. Form may be obtained by contacting the Division of Fire Prevention Services (727) 562-4327 extension 3062. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. Response: A knox-bo:c has been shown at the entry gate. See revised sheets LF-100 and E03.01. 5. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. All underground fire lines and hydrants must be installed by a contractor with a class I, II or V license on a separate plan with a Fire Permit. So Noted on Sheet CU-100 this is verify it will be on a Fire Permit. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged. See sheet CU-100 for notes requiring underground fire lines and hydrants to be installed p►•ior to construction. 6. Sheet CS-100 shows bollards located on the south east corner of the building, please clarify as this is a required Fire Lane that Fire Department Access will not be restricted. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. Response: No bollards are proposed. 7. This appears to be a windowless structure, Must meet the requirements of NFPA 1 Fire Code 2009 Edition 10.9 Emergency Plans.10.9.1 Where Required. Emergency plans shall be provided for high-rise, health care, ambulatory health care, residential board and care, assembly, day-care C-� Kimley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City ofClearrvater, March 13, 2014, Page 5 � and Associates, Inc. centers, special amusement buildings, detention and correctional occupancies, educational, underground and windowless structures, facilities storing or handling materials covered by Chapter 60, or where �required by the AHJ. Response: See revised architectural plans for the appropriate notations. 8. Note: This is a D.R.C. approval only. Still needs to be reviewed prior to C.D.B. Response: Acknowledged LAND RESOURCE REVIEW Prior to issuance of a Building Permit: 1. The tree preservation plan shows 18 trees slated for removal. Tree 020 is shown as unknown and not shown to be removed. This tree is half dead Viburnum shrub that should be removed due to declining health. Please a�ply for a tree removal permit for the 18 trees proposed for removal. Response: Tree 020 is proposed for removal. See revised sheet LT-100 for removed tree and notes requiring tree removal permit. 2. There are 21 Sabal Palm currently proposed inside the drainage swale. The City doesn't allow the planting of anything other than grass at the inside retention ponds. Please either find another place on site for the Palms or change your deficit table to reflect the changes. Response: The location of palms within the drainage swale has been coardinated with the stormwater review department and the trunk volume of these palms has been accounted for in the total pond volume calculations. General Notes• 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all �erformance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Response: See sheet CG-250 for notes requiring the approval/inspection of erosion and sedimentation control measures. 2. With 18 trees being removed a total of 269 diameter inches will be removed. The landscape plans proposes 270 inches leaving a 1 inch excess for the site. This could change depending on how you address the palms currently proposed in the stormwater swales. Response: See revised tree mitigation calculations on sheet LT-100. rl .R' ' !' G-„ Kimley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 6 � and Associates, Inc. PARKS AND RECREATION REVIEW Open space impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727- 562-4818 to calculate the assessment. Response: Acknowledged. Coordination with Debbie Reid has occurred, and a draft copy of the assessment has been provided to the City. PLANNING REVIEW Planning Review: show and acknowledge prior to CDB 1. The acreage and square footage provided in the application does not match the acreage and square footage provided on the Cover Sheet (CI- 100).Clarify. Response: See revised cover sheet and FLD Application for updated acreage and square footage. 2. Page 3 of application indicates there is to be one accessory dwelling unit in the warehouse. Show the location and dimension of the accessory dwelling unit on floor plan on Sheet CS-100. Response: No accessory dwelling unit is proposed. Sheet A00.01 notes a use of Industrial Limited, Non Residential Use. The "density" of one (1) is in reference to a single warehouse building. 3. On Sheet CS-100, it is not clear what the 20 foot and 70 foot dimensions represent. Is the 20 foot the parking space length and the 70 foot a setback dimension from parking are curb to building? Revise or Clarify. Response: See sheet CS-100 for revised dimensions. 4. On Sheet CS-100, provide the street names. Indicate each centerline and width, paved width and intersections and bus shelter, if any. Response: See sheet CS-100 for street names, paved width, and right of way. No bus shelters exist. 5. On Sheet CS-100, provide the setback dimension from east property line to the asphalt drive. Response: See sheet CS-100 for revised dimensions at fi•ont back and mid- point along eastei�n property line. 6. Signage is not approved as a part of this application. Since the existing signs are to be removed any new sign shall be reviewed for compliance through a separate sign permit or Comprehensive Sign Program. Response: A building fa�ade sign is proposed and will be submitted for review through a separate sign pennit. G_� Kimley-Horn Kevin Nurnberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 7 � and Associates, Inc. 7. That any future signage must be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff. Response: A building fa�ade sign architecturally integrated with the building is proposed and will be submitted for review through a separate sign permit. 8. On Sheet LP-100, the southern perimeter landscaped buffer is required to have a minimum of 12 shade trees. The landscape plan does not show the required number of shade trees. Submit a Comprehensive Landscape Plan that provides detailed responses on how this deficiency is mitigated by the landscape plan �rovided. Response: See revised sheet LP-100 for 6 additional trees provided along the southern buffer. See the Comprehensive Landscaping Application for additional information. 9. On Sheet LP-100, the land area and plant material dedicated to Vehicle Use Area (Vi1A) is not being called out within the plan. Identify the land area with actual square footage shown on plan that is being used to satisfy the criteria. Provide a response in a Comprehensive Landscape Plan application that details how the plan mitigates the standard requirement such as rather than provide interior landscape islands with one tree and shrubs as required we have proposed X number of shade trees along the asphalt cirive that equates and this design should satisfy the standard. Response: See revised sheet LP-100 for dimensions and callouts of the dedicated VUA landscape area. See sheet CS-100 for hatched area denoting the VUA landscape area. See the Comprehensive Landscaping Application for additional information. 10. On Sheet LP-100, the foundation landscape note states that there are 68 shrubs planted in the required five-foot wide landscape area along Calumet Street but these shrubs are not shown within the buffer. If the shrubs are planted within the required perimeter landscape buffer this needs to be called out and the deviation to the standard shall be addecl to the Comprehensive Landscape Program application such as due to the location-design of dry ponds requirecl number of foundation landscape shrubs have been planted in the buffer etc. Response: See revised sheet LP-100 for notes and callouts depicting the required building foundation shrubs. See the Comprehensive Landscaping Application for additional information. 11. In regards to the Hercules and Calumet perimeter landscape buffers, call out the dry pond slope ratios. Front slopes of stormwater retention areas may comprise up to 50 percent of any required landscape buffer width, provided that the slope is 4 to 1 or flatter and all required shrub plantings are not more than six inches below the top of the bank and provided that the buffer width is at least five feet in width. If deficient add to Comprehensive Landscape Program application. G-� KICTII@�/-HOrCI Kevin Nurnberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 8 � and Associates, Inc. Response: See revised sheet LP-100 for notes and callouts regarding the landscaping provided below the top of bank. See the Comprehensive Landscape Plan application for additional information. 12. Provide the actual dry pond slope ratio (3 to 1) on Sheet CG-100 and LS- 100. Response: See revised sheets LP-100 and CS-100 for dry pond slope ratio. Pond slopes not to exceed 4: l. 13. That prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities, including individual distribution lines serving this development within . the right-of-way along the east side of S. Hercules Ave and the south side of Calumet Street, as applicable, must be installed underground unless undergrounding is not practicable. Response: All utilities in the right of way are underground. See revised sheet CU-100 for notes requiring the installation of underground utilities. 14. That the dumpster enclosure shall be made of a masonry wall of similar material, architectural details and colors that match the building. Response: See sheet CG-150 far dumpster enclosure details to match building finish and City Detail # 701. 15. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all of the proposed landscaping shall be installed. Response: See sheet LP-1 00 for note requiring all landscape to be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 16. Provide additional landscaping around the mechanical pads on the east side of the building. Mechanical equipment must be screened on all sides and not be visible to adjacent property owners or public right-of-way CDC Sections 3-201.D. Response: See sheet LP-100 for revised landscaping providing 5' tall hedge at time of installation for screening of inechanical equipment. 17. Any proposed fence in front of the principle building must be PVC as set forth in Section 3-804. Response: The proposed decorative fence shall not exceed 6' in height and is located in the side and rear yards with only a 10' segment of fence proposed between the building and calumet at the building entry to provide secure access. See Flexible Development Application for additional information. 18. The graphic scale on Sheet CI-102 is not accurate. Revise. Response: See revised sheet CI-] 02 for correct scale. 19. The submitted parking demand study is confusing because it conflicts with the number of parking spaces in the a�plication and with itself. The G_� KII'TlI@�/-HOI"tl Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, March 13, 2014, Page 9 � and Associates, Inc. application indicates that 10 parking spaces will be provided on-site. The parking demand study states that there will be 12 parking spaces and 2 loading bays in the loading dock area. In the summary and conclusion section, it is stated again that there will be 12 parking spaces and 2 loading bays in the loading dock area and then in the next line states that 14 parking spaces are anticipated to be adequate for the proposed warehouse building. Please clarify the actual number of parking spaces to be located on-site. Response: Please review the revised parking study for clarification of the 10 parking spaces and 2 loading bays for a total of 12 proposed parking spaces. 20. In 2011, the Community Development Board approved a 12,000 square foot building addition to an existing 59,943 square foot warehouse located at 2000 Calumet. I believe that the addition was never completed. Is this warehouse being built rather than the addition to the other building where operations included hotel laundry service, mail processing, motor pool maintenance, book and media material distribution center, and record archives? Response: This warehouse is being built instead of the 12,000 SF building addition that was previously plaimed at 2000 Calumet, but does not consist of hotel laundry, mail processing, motor pool maintenance, or a book and media material distribution center. This warehouse only includes parishioner records storage. 21. The parking demand study does not include the dwetling unit? Response: No dwelling unit is proposed. 22. No one will recall the parking demand study from 2011. You should submit that study to support the parking demand assumptions of this parking demand study for this project since intensity of use for Z000 Calumet exceeds this proposal as noted above. Nevertheless, if vans, cars . or buses are to be used for staff then provide a schedule of bus, van or car arrivals and departures. Where will staff catch the bus on site or on the street? Where will the bus stop on-site or maneuver without blocking or interfering with vehicles in parking spaces? Bus Shelters? If bus stops on street how will it not impede street traffic? Response: The previous parking study for 2000 Calumet has been included in the resubmittal package. See revised parking Study for 2005 Calumet for bus schedule and pick up/drop off location. No bus shelters/stops are proposed on or off site for this project. 23. Is there enough queue lane distance at entrance gate for buses and cars or vans without sticking out into traffic? Response: See sheets CS-100 and LF-100 for revised gate location which is 40' from the property line as required per Traffic and Engineering review. C�� Kimley-Horn Kevin Nurnberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 10 � and Associates, Inc. 24. Since the request is mostly because of a lack of parking on site, was the parking demand study and its methodology discussed with and approved by the community development coordinator and in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principals as set forth in CDC Section 3-1401C? Response: The methodology for this study is consistent with the guidance provided by Bennett Elbo to the consultant team as well as the previously approved study methodology that was utilized by Florida Design Consultants for the October 2011 Calumet Warehouse Expansion Traffic Analysis. 25. In regards to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion 1, expand upon the statement provided. Code requires 133 parking spaces for a warehouse building with 88,747 square feet. The overall property can accommodate a larger parking area or additional parking spaces by reducing the buitding size to provide required parking spaces. The response needs to establish why providing the required number of parking spaces is impractical for the square footage of the proposed building. Response: Please review the revised parking demand study for the additional information provided on the actual parking needs and the more detailed transit plan. Based upon the actual COS land use (which does not require the same transportation needs of a"typical warehouse"), the parking needs are quite less. Specific transportation demands for the site and detailed transit (bus) schedules are provided which identify the more realistic transportation and parking needs for the project site. 26. The concrete pad setback 7 feet from the front (west) setback is for outdoor mechanical equipment. CDC Section 3-903.I. allows mechanical equipment not enclosed within a building are permitted in a side and rear setback requirements but shall be screened from any public right- of-way and adjacent properties. Any consideration to relocating the proposed mechanical equipment from the front (west) setback to top of building which also need s to be screened from view. Response: This has been incorporated as a request of the revised FLD application. The concrete pad for the AC unit is located no closer than 12'-6" to the Hercules property line. See sheet LP-100 for revised landscape providing a 5' tall hedge at time of installation for dense screening of mechanical equipment. 27. An automatic permanent irrigation system providing complete water coverage for all required and other landscaping materials shall be provided and maintained as a fully functioning system in order to preserve the landscaping in a healthy growing condition as set forth in Section 3-1201.C, CDC. C-� Kimley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, March 13, 2014, Page 11 � and Associates, Inc. Response: See sheets LI-100, LI-101, and LI-150 for irrigation plan, notes, and details. 28. The request also includes one (1) dwelling unit located inside the building. Will this dwelling unit consist of amenities such as a cooker. Is the unit to be used for rotating security personal who will be on-site 24 hours a day? Provide a detailed statement for the purpose of the unit and its location in the building. Response: No dwelling unit is proposed. Sheet A00.01 notes a use of Industrial Limited, Non Residential Use. The "density" of one (1) is in reference to a single warehouse building. 29. That the proposed solid waste enclosure match the existing buildings with regard to fit, finish and materials and that evidence of same be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits. Response: See sheet CG-150 for dumpster enclosure details to match building .finish and City Detail # 701. 30. Twenty-eight (28) accent trees two for every forty feet of building length or palm equivalents (25 percent of required accent tree) are required for foundation landscape please show and call out how this is being met. Response: See revised sheet LP-100 for clarification on building foundation landscape provided. 31. All landscape material shall be Florida Grade #1. Response: See sheet LP-150, note D.2.A requiring all plant material be FL Grade # 1 or better. SOLID WASTE REVIEW Please show a dumpster enclosure not just a pad with the City of Clearwater specs as shown in index #701. See sheet CG-150 for dumpster enclosure details to match building finish and City Detail # 701. STORMWATER REVIEW Prior to Communitv Develonment Board: At this phase in permitting detailed stormwater calculations are not required. Since they were provided, the City has reviewed them and the following issues have been o6served: 1. The FEMA floodway for Alligator Creek needs to be clearly delineated on the site plan if it is available on the most recent floodplain map. There shall not be construction in the floodway as per FElVIA guidelines. C-� Ki m ley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, March 13, 2014, Page 12 � and Associates, Inc. Response: See revised plan sheets (all applicable plans) for FEMA floodway designation of Alligatoi• Creek. 2. Cup for cup floodplain compensation needs to be provided for fill within the AE floodplain shown on the plans. Response: See revised plan sheets (all applicable plans) far FEMA floodway designation of Alligator Creek, and the revised stormwater management report identifying floodplain compensation. 3. Total impervious area is not consistent on plans and stormwater management plan. The proposed pond was not accounted for in calculations for post development calculations. Response: See revised stormwater management report and associated calculations accounting for the proposed pond. 4. Label and verify outfall types in details. Outfall types in details are not consistent with grading and drainage plans (sheet CG-100). Response: See revised sheet CG-100 for callouts ofthe proposed outfalls and sheet CG-200 for outfall details. 5. Please revise the stormwater system that is connected to trench drain. Current design will discharge trash/erosion directly into City ditch. Runoff from the trench drain is to be treated for water quality and attenuation. Respo»se: Based on conversations with City staff, the 1,300 square feet of truck dock that will not be treated in the dry retention pond will be offset with com�ensatory treatment of 1,900 square feet of offsite impervious area. Please refer to the stormwater management plan. Trash will be screened from the trench drain grate and erosion will be controlled out the outlet with rip rap. Prior to Building Permit: l. Provide cross section of proposed swale and show that swale meets 4:1 side slope on plans. Response: See revised sheet CG-100 for typical cross section for the dry retention system calling out 4:1 side slopes. 2. Show on the plans that ponds meet 4:1 side slope. Response: See revised sheet CG-100 for plan and typical cross section for the dry retention system which call out 4:1 side slopes. 3. Verify what portion of proposed PVC underdrain is solid or perforated. Response: See revised sheet CG-100 for extents of solid and perforated PVC underdrain. i�:. G_� Kimley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, March 13, 2014, Page 13 � and Associates, Inc. 4. Specify the high points at entrances on plans. Response: See revised sheet CG-100 for high point elevations at entrances. Prior to C.O.• 1. Submit county drainage connection permit for drainage ditch along Hercules. Response: Acknowledged General Notes• 1. Please cloud any/all changes on the plans before returning them for re- review. Response: Acknowledged 2. All resubmittals shatl be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each condition has been met. Response: Acknowledged 3. Additional conditions may be forth coming based on the responses to the above conditions or to new information not on hand at time of review. Response: Acknowledged TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 1. Parking study provides for a total of 14 parking spaces which includes 2 loading bays and 1 accessible parking space. The civil site plan shows a total of 12 parking spaces which includes the 2loading bays and 1 accessible parking space. Please revise the plan or study to reflect each other. Response: Please review the revised parking study for clarification of the 10 parking spaces and 2 loading bays for a total of 12 proposed parking spaces. 2. Provisions shall be made to provide for 40 feet of clear stacking in advance of all guardhouses or security gates. This is to prevent traffic from backing up into the public street system. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-1406, B 1.) Response: See sheets CS-100 and LF-100 for revised gate location located at 40' from the property line. 3. Demonstrate using a scaled turning template of a maximum sized delivery truck used can enter, stage and exit the site. Response: Please refer to the site plan. A City of Clearwater fire truck tuniing template has been modeled to show that large vehicles can enter, stage and exit the site. � Kimley-Horn Kevin Numberger, City of Clearwater, Mazch 13, 2014, Page 14 �� and Associates, Inc. Prior to Buildin� Construction Permit: 1. Provide appropriate traffic control signage i.e. do not enter signs and stop signs per current M.U.T.C.D standards. Response: See revised sheet CS-100 for signage locations per MUTCD standards. General Notes• 1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). The proposed project's TIF amount with the credit is: $27,171.54. Response: Acknowledged 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response: Acknowledged We appreciate your attention to this matter. Should you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact this offce. S incerely, KIMLE ORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. isto her�vl. Hice, RLA P CMH.Slll, �K:�S� I1RG\II81380]3-COSCcmnl W�rthauae\KHA ADMIMSubmnW�V.A1F201COJ1E�ORCRc.isian\RA1 OJI]I4KNUmbsrgc COC-14BI3B0]YCMHdoc� Attachments ��� � ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attcrched Dwellings, Mrxed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INfORMATION. ANY MISLEAOING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT IIVFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FIILED OUT COMPIETELY AND CORRECTLY, AfVD SU6MITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLEfE SETS OF PLANS AND APPUCATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMIT7ED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPIETE SEfS OF PLANS AND APPLItATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES?. PIANS AND APPLICATIOIVS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INT� SE?5. THE APPLICANT, BY fILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNlTY DEVELOPMENT CODE. fIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPUCATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTYOWNER(PERDEED): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC. MAILINGADDRESS: 503 CLEVELAND STREET, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727-4 67-6584 EMAIL: LEGALDIRFLAG@FLAG.ORG AGENTORREPRESENTATIVE: DANIEL O' FARRELL MAILIIVGADDRE55: 503 CLEVELAND ST, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727-423-3007 EMAII: DANIEL@COS.FLAG.ORG ADDRESS OF SUBIECT PROPERTY: 2 0 0 5_ CALUMET STREET, CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33 7 65 PARCELNUMBER(Sj: O1-29-15-16488-000-0200 LEGALDESCRIPTION: ' See attached PROPOSED U5E{S}: Commercial– Storaqe Warehouse (See Comprehensive Landscaping Application for additional information.) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: �� p„4iri,, �����An - S��-akkaEhm�nt A SpCCifitolly identlfy the reques[ �� RPri��rtinn in ronuirarl 1 S' hnilrlin ca h� k fnr rlum ctar rl In�ati t (inc/ude oll requested code flexibility; ' � t—�� (�--(�---nn ee attar.hmPnt A e.g., reduction in required number of � A 10' cPgmPnt nf fPncP ic nrn�ncPd hPt���PPn building and cah�m t^t parking spo[es, heiqht serbacks, !or the buildina entrv to nrovid �r a cc s�ze, �or w�drn, specific use, erc.): 4) Allowance for mechanical e4uipment to be on the front (west) setback with landscape screening from ROW and adjacent properties. — 5) No sidewalk is proposed along Hercules Ave. Owner to provide an in-lieu-of payment. Planning 8 Davetopment Department, 100 S. Myrlle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01112 ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOl10WING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEIN6 FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING D15TRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DE516NATION: Industrial, Research and Technology District ("IRT") IL—Industrial Limited EXISTINGUSE(currentlyexistingonsite�: CommerCial WaYehouse PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remainj: COIriTC12 Y C1 dl Warehous e SITE AREA: 141, 8 8 8. 5 sq. ft. 3. 2 6 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings►: Existing: 4 8, 6 9 3 sq. ft. Proposed: $ $ , $ 6'7 sq. ft. Maximum Atlowable: g2 , 22 g sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: g g, � 4 � sq. ft. 5econd use: N/A sq. ft. Third use: N�A sq. h. FLOOR AREA RATIO jtotal square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site�: Existing: 0 . 3 4 Proposed: p _ h � Maximum Allowable: 0. 6 5 � BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (1" floor square footage of all buildings►: Existing: 4 8, 6 9 3 sq. ft. ( 3 4 .o of site) Proposed: 8 8, 7 4 7 sq. ft. ( 6 3 % of site} Maximum Permitted: g 2, 2 2 g sq. ft. ( I�j /A °6 of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer}: Existing: 3 6, 9 4 2 sq. ft. ( 2 5 % of site) Proposed: 3, 62 4 sq. ft. ( 3 % of site} VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Existing: 4 0, 0 0 0 sq. ft. ( 2 8 °o of site) Proposed: 21 , 94 0 sq. ft. ( � c, °o of site) Planning 8 Development Department, iU� S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-56211567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of B Revised 01H2 IMPERVIOUS SURfACE RATIO �total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site): Existing: 0 . 6 3 Proposed: 0 . 8 5 Maximum Permitfed: 0_ 8 5 DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT: Existing: 2 Existing buildings to be removed Existing: s i n� 1 P_ S t � rS� Proposed: t proposed building Proposed: 4 3. 5' Maximum Permitted: �] / j� Maximum Permitted: 5 0' OFF-STREET PARKING: Existing: 95 Proposed: 1 0 nn���m�m Req���ed: See Attachment A and and revised parking study W HAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROIECT UPON COMPLETION? $ 4, O O O, O O O (+/—) ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADiACENT PROPERTY: � North: Industrial, Research and Technoloqy District ("IRT") South: I RT East: I RT West: I RT STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS r,,.., I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this �� day of representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize �?Q� �, �� `� • to me and/or by City representatives to visit and photograph the �•- �-.S�ilrl. � ;,u,���_"" �nrho is personally known-has property descri in his application. ^M� r�U ' SignaturebFp��Ter�7owner or representative Notary public, . f °1' . , ., �",��_` My commission expires: , i ,. •;. , ; _ . .. . .. , ,: . . .. ... .. .. .... y. . .. . . .. .. . . . _ .. � _ . , ). � ,.. , � ....... , f ... , . . i�i4 +f}, - ' � �. �.°._. . �n`P •i' PUS�� BRlAN A. ASA' •. � � I;Sia . 18067 * ~ "'�' * EXPIRES: October 4, 2016 s�' a o� "'rFnF F�p?` Bonded TMru Budget Notary ervices Planning 8 Development Department, 100 5. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwaler, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 ot 8 Revised D1/12 ° Clearwater � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Site Plan Submittal Package Check list IN ADDITiON TO THE COMPLETED FLEXiBLE DEVELOPMENT (fLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE fOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: 'H Responses to the flexibility criteria Eor the specific use(sj being requested as set {orth in the Zoning Districtjs) in which the subject property is located_ The attached Flexibte Development Application fl'exibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. � Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Ftexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used io provide these responses. � A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of atl current stru�tures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s}-of-way within and adjacent to the site. 'X7 If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home•owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.0$3, the application must provide that informdtion �equired by Section 4-202.A.5_ �t If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pi'er, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and speci�cations prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. B A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape archited drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: 9 Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individua) sheet numbers referenced thereon. _� _ Nnrth arrn�v,.stale, IQCation. map and dat_e prepared___ _ _ . __ _ �] Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to he constructed in phases. N/AO location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFEj of the property, as applicable. _ _ __ . _ — --- - � Location, footprint and size oi ali existing end propose�uildings and sf�uctures on the sife. � Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. � � 0 Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and _ _ _ _---- — - — - --- ---- . __ _ __ seawalls and any proposed'utitity easements. � Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. __ _ . __ -- - ____ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _- __ -- -- _ _ � location of solid waste collection facilities, required s�reening and provisions for accessibility for collection. 0 Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. � All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections _ and�us s#ielters, 9 Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, 6uilding lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. B Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning & Devetopment Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 0'1t12 � Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. 0 Demolition plan. � Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. 0 If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than SO°6 (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand 5tudy Guidelines for further information. X7 A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species oF all existing trees with.a DBH of four in�hes or more, and identifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. B A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. 0 A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following conditions: • Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or , ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or in[ersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Gearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown Factors. � A landscape plan sha11 be provided for any project where there is a new use or a �hange of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25°6 or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reFlected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; � or a parking lot requires additional Jandstaping�ursuant tathepro_visi¢nsof Article 3, Division_ 14. The landscape_pl_an shall_include th_e following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: � Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. �7 �xisting tr�es onsike andimmQdiately adjacent to_the �ite,byspecies, size and Iocati4n, incl_uding drip line. __ _ � Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior�landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. • 0 Location o�f exis�ng and proposed st�uctures �nd impfovements, irfctading but nnC timit�drto sidewattcs, wafls, fenc�s, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructians, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easemenis, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may inftuence the proposed landscape. � tocation of parking areas and other veh'rcutar use argas; ineluding parkirtg spaces; circulation aisfes� int�rior landseape islands and curbing. � Drainage and retention areas, including sv�ales, side slopes and bottom elevations. � Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE 51X (6} GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION i5 BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The prop�sed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, densiry and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed warehouse design matches the architectural scale, style and landscape palette of adjacent properties to the site. . 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site does not hinder the use of adiacent land. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in�the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed develonment will not adversly affect health or safetv of persons residing or workin� in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ' The proposed property will be used for owner storage. Only authorized personnel will be accessing the property. � 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of ihe parcel proposed for development. _ The proposed warehouse matches the architectural scale and stvle of neighborinq buildings Landscaping will match adjacent properties within the industrial district 6. The design of the proposed developmeni minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The adverse impacts of the warehouse will not exceed current impacts or developmental standards. Planning & Development Oepartment, 100 S. Myrtto Avenue, Cleanvater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12 ° Clearwater � Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(S) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS L�GATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAIL, EACH CRITERION IS BE1NG COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROP05AL {USE SEPARATE SHEETS A5 NECESSARY). 1 See Attachment A z. 3. 4. 5. ' 6. 8. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 7 of 8 Revised 01112 ° Clearwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of all property owners n deed — PRINT full names �' `�j ��� �--- C.._- d �Lc'�,' - c,.) �L✓� : �--�/t tL3��►1(Z�/��i / /!/� 2. That (! am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s} of the following described property: 2l , ' �'�� % � % . C'�.li � �� 3 � "%� 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request): �r�w ��-_-�'.����� �1,�l�i,�s -� 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: ��LI� c.� r�y���-- a�. �n.�r ^i-t�ic.iv fi- �-t-'�cx--� as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. 7hat this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (i/we), the un signed authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. �--- rty Owner _ Property Owner �� ��-^ � ����. �.j �.l...� �.:. L . r .. _ ��'. 4 ,. . .•, . ., : -_. _ _. . . . . .. s ` � ' `` � Property Owner `�"�-� Property Owner ._. ' �.��y ��� � ti_ ��'1�.���� � �_-� � �'C r; s. �. � "t��i �1 i .: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF TIiE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON > 7`' THIS �� DAY OF �!�-��y , zC���/° , PEF2SONALLYAPPEARED ������� ���'fZ���� �� �� U WH� HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN / G { DEP05ED AND SAYS THAT HE/SHE FULLY UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HElSHE SIGNED. <°:"`�� ��e�; BRiAN A. ASAY * ",� �� * MY COP;1P.41SSi0PJ � EE 2tenfi� ��" , EXF!RES: October 4, 2C16 Notary Public Signature �'F oF F�c,�' Boeded Tpru Budgel Notary Services Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: / c/ y�f � Planning 8 Development Department, 1Q0 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�1865 Page 8 of 8 Revlsed 01112 Exhibit A Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed developn�ent is located at tlie corr:e� s of Hercules Ave and Calurnet Street, in the IRT Zonif�g district, as a�•e all sirrrouttding properties. The new warehouse building develapme�zt is proposed at approximately 85% of the maximum height and FAR allowed in this district, and is situated adjacent (north) of an older 100, 000+ S� Ft manufacluring warehouse, and adjacent (soutlt) ta a 60, 000 Sq Ft record storage wareltouse by tlte same owner. Nortlteast is a UPS te�mirzal wareliouse of similarfloor• a�-ea. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Tlzis development, at 85% of development maxinnm�, meeting all landscape buffer- requir•ements, meeting current storm water requi�-ements, with mimimum attached signage and with building night lig/tting, with adequate parking without huge surface parking lots, should be an attracti�Te addition to tlze area and will iiot hinder or discourage appropriate develapment and use of adjacent land and buildings. Tltis brand new facility with no adverse noise or olfacto�y effects, or excessive dzcck t��af�'ic should actually i�:crease tlte surroat�tding land values. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Tliis proposed semi-automated record storage warehouse will have no manufacturing or fabrication o�- other similar activities involving some employee risk. Thet•e will be no hazardous cltemicals used, in fact r:o chemicals at all. There x�ill be no dust or smells generated. There will be no activities outside the building that would effect anyone else in the netghborhood In short, tliere will be no adverse effect on sur•rounding healtli and welfare. Operating Itours spanrting hvo sltifts and 241iou�• security will increase the level of safety in tlie entire �reighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development irtchcdes a significant reduction i�: required parking spaces, based on the use of existirig, in place private bus and sha�ttle van transport to tlie ezisti�ig similar faciliry across Calumet Street to tlte nortl:. This is incorporated to sueh an extent tltat there sl:ould be ve�y little increase in trips generated wlten this �zew facility opens. I�i additio�z, vehicles exiting tlie site will anly access Calumet Street, and tlie�i Her�ules at tlte tra�c signal. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Tlie community character is an inclustrial disti•ict tivith a range of mixed uses iricludi�:g war•eliousing, UPS package ter�rlrnal, tool & die manufactu�•ifig, automotive sa7es, including son:e sts-ip-mal! rype of b:rsinesses on tlie west side of Herctrles Ave. Tke proposed development is a lar-ge, niodern, J2iglt-bay type of tia�arel:ouse for recof d storage. It is a comparatively ve�y clean, quiet mzd odor free activity. The new war-ehoi�.se is consistent witlr tlae conzinuniry character• and should also iinprove tl:e character 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed development has fio acoustic or olfactory adverse e, f�ects, will have attr-active perimeter landscaping and minimun2 su�faci�ig pa� king, I:ardly visible from tlie street, and no outdoor storage. f ��VRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria). 1. The develvpment or redevelopment is otlierwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in the zoning district. Tlie only deviation in tlie developmefTt staridards ��egttested is a redzrction i�2 tlze par•kirtg requiren:ent, pj-in:arily due to the fact that tlte ownef• and user Itas their ow�z private btrs a�zcl shuule van system for all employees, and specifically tlte ones at this facility. Tliis system is not a proposed, firture idea, bttt is operating and can be observed at present to se�vice the 5 act-e warel:ozrse facility north across the street fi-ont tliis pr-operty. The current schedule and level ofservice operating now is adeguate to service tlie new wareliouse. faciliry as well, ie, this f-elatively large new warehouse building would vi�-tually gener•ate few if any new velticle trips. The reduction in par•ki�Tg lot allows us to maximize the size of tlte building, witlzin all otlter standard developmefzt constrainis to 85% of tlie FAR maximum. h2 additior:, tlie pr•oper�ty is aniusctally limited in that t12e south SO feet of this site, eqcrating to 21,500 Sq Ft is dedicated to sto�m water drainage easemertt such that no other use can be made of that area otl:er than green space. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of tlnis Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The develop�nent will consist ofa ��ecord storage warel:ouse in this Indirstrial district wliicli has a very small employee to floor area ratio, and �r-ivate transportation for the employees as described above. Tlie activity does �:ot produce noise, odor, or waste products beyorzd occasional recyclable paper. Proper stor•m water retention jacilities will be constructed for the first time on tltis site, as well as fire sprirtkle�s and it�ll surrounding access to the building for the Fire Dept. Signage will be a ntinimum to iclentify tlte bttildi�tg on tlte two str-eet sides, and tlie building and signage will be attr-actively lit at niglit. Two firll shifts of opes•ation ir: this non-residential district will increase secuf-ity for the entire neighborhood. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. Warehousing is an approved use in this district and record stoi•age is probably tlie least inte�zse r-egarding numbe�• of employees, na manufactu�7ng or fabr7cation type activities, no noise or smells, eic. There is nothing that would improve noimal and o� derly development ai:d improvement. On the contrary, a new large warehotrse would improve tlie vacant land and the rieighbof-Izood. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Adjoining properties will suffer �10 cletriment at all as a Yesult of the proposed developmettt, as all visital a�zd setback reqtcirenzents are being met, IQ7IC�SCQI71i1g buffe�s, and there are no acrdible or- olfacto�y adirerse ef�'ects at all, or outdool• storage or excessive delivej•ies. Large semi trcrcks will be seldont, if at all. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use charaeteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning disfict as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic conh-ibutor to the City's economie base by diversifying tl�e local economy or by creating jobs. c. The development proposal accammodates the expansion or redeveIopment of an existing economic contributor. � d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing. e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other sirnilar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working water&ont use. The proposed use of warehouse is permitted by die fi�ture land use catego�y, and is tlie most commo�: arse in tlie surrounding properties and therefore will not change tJte essential use characteristics of the neighbo�•Itood. It demonstr•ates compliance witl: a) It is a permittecl in this zoning district as a flexible standard developme�zt use; and c) Tlie proposed use accommodates a 3x expansion of an existing economic contr-ibutor. The recor-�Is stored facilitate tens of thousands of visitors to the Clea�-water Cliurch of Scientology buildings each year•. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, Iot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: Use, lot width, reqt�ired setbacl�s, l:eight and storm water retention itenzs all meet tlte mittimum standard reyuirements for tliis area. Tire reqirest for reditction of off-street parking requirement, replaced by a private transit system, allows fot• eliminatio�t of large, s:erface parking lots, wlticli will acttrally provide a visible and environmental imp��ovement even in this industrial zoned district. a. The proposed develop�nent will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. Tlie p�•oposed development iti�ill not inipede the normal attd a�'derly clevelopntent and i�np�•ove�ne��t of tlre su� raunding prope�•ties as described ear•lier. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; The proposed building is a tivat•el�ouse witli a two-tone colo�• scltetne: slightly darder color at the base, (abotst 4 ft ltigh) and a lighte�• color- for ihe arpper main body of t12e biiilding. TI:e birilding will also be attf•actively accented witlt nigltt lighting. (Rendering included in this submission). tlie existing �netal building and thereby contply witl2 the design guidelines of tttis district. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the establisl�ed or emerging character of an area; Tl:e proposed developnrent is a large, high-bay warehouse tivhich is at the upper• end and will be a signi�cant improvement to the cltaracter of t1:e i�idustrial district, and hopefielly lead tfie emerging character of up-scale warehousing. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number oithe following design elements: i. Changes in horizontal building planes ii. Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; � iii. Variety in materials, colors and textures; iv. Distinctive fenestration patterns; v. Building stepbacks; and vi. Distinctive roof forms. The new war-ehouse building will incorporate building setbacks of wide landscaped setbacks serving as storni water retentian ponds as well. It will not have excessive arcltitectirf�al detailing as it is a wareltouse building. It will use permanent, conct•ete tilt-wall construction and will be pairited in light, brigl:t colors or 1vl:ite and off-wliite base. It will liave n2ini�r:um but attractive signage, and the building will have exterior accent lighting at night. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The proposed development wil! provide wide landscape bttffers and over twenty-f ve new perin:eter trees. Tlte south side I:as a SO ft storrn water easement with stream tl:at also ltas mature trees at the property line. Thef-e is only one building, .. ° Clearwater U Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALl APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (i ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD, IF NECESSARY, WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. � THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF 7HE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Church of Scientology Flag Services Organization, Inc: MAILING ADDRESS: 503 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33765 PHONE NUMBER: 727,423.3007 E►v�A��: DanielCa�cos.flag.org AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Daniel O�Farrell MAILING ADDRE55: 503 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33765 PHONE NUMBER: 727.423.3007 EMAIL: Daniel@cos.fla�.org ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2005 Calumet Street. Clearwater, FL 33765 1. Existing trees along southern buffer (South of drainage easement) to be used for buffer requirements in DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: addition to 6 proposed trees (3 Winter Cassia, 3 Crape Myrtle) to meet the tota of 12 required trees. Specifically identify the request 2• To provide all required VUA lan scaping adjacent to building on east side between riveway and building (indude all requested code flexibility; ""����01`����YQ�"�"'��'• e.g., reduction in required number of 3. due to the location/design of dry ponds, required foundation plantings have been moved to the perimeter parking spaces, height setbacks, lot buffer to meet or exceed foundation planting requirements. size, lot width, specific use, etc.): • ee or a i on in orma �on. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS .� I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this /F3 day of representations made in this application are true and �uyZ,� �� Y , to me and/or by accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize ��z„� City representatives to visit and photograph the G�" £' J��OJ'cc�,�l'c'LC`"�c� �'J�' who is personally known ha� property describ in this application. p���Ee� _�_ �— __ �__�i�{�— r� 3 �T, ^ lx.�__�' ;�""...; �� BRIAN A. ASAY Signat��e o p r�y �er�or representatrve �� Notary public, # , ��Y COP�1h41SSi0N d EE 2180 �-� �� � �� xt' `` � i_� ., � ; � t � , �z � s z EXPIFES; October 4, 201 .-4^ t } �., � � �� �`� � �3 � � ` � �'�� j � ��?+ �T�.J My commission expires: 9r. s�-�L��� Bonded Thru Budo?t Notarv Servit j 1i Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 1 of 2 Revised 01M2 ° learwater �C U Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application Flexibilitv Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. Architectural Theme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. Proposed landscaping is integrated with the architectural style of the proposed warehouse. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. There is no p�osed landsca�e lightingwithin the �roject 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Proposed landscape will enhance the community character above and beyond what currenUy exists on site, and will be irrigated and reguarly maintaine to present an aes etic y p easing environment to e community. 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Proposed landscapin� will not detract from the value of properdes in the immediate vicinity of the proposed improvement 5. Speciol Areo or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Does not apply. Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. MyRle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-d567; Fax: 727-562�t865 Page 2 of 2 Revised 01N2 4 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: J. PAUL RAYMOND, Esquire Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Strect, Suite 200 Post Office Box 1669 (33757) Clearwater, Florida 33756 Parcel I.D. No. O1/29/15/16488/00010200 SPECIAL WAI21tANTY DE�U TI-lIS SPECIAL WAKRf1NTY DECD madc this J�day of Septcmbcr, 2013, by and benveen RETLAW-HERCULCS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 800 Snug Island, Clearwater, FL 33767, hereinafier called the "Grantor", to CHURCH OF SC[ENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZAT[ON, INC., a Florida corporation, whose address is 503 Cteveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33755, hereinafter called the "Grantee". Whenever used herein, the terms "Grantor" and "Grantce" shall include aU of the parties to this instrument and their heirs, legal representatives, successors and assisns. WITNESSETH: THAT THE, GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dotiar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, by Ehese presents, does �rant, bazgain, sell, alien, remise, retease, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, aU that certain land situate in Pinellas County, Florida, (the "Premises"), being more particularly described on Cxhibit "A" attached hereto and made a pan hereof. THIS CONVEYANCE is made subject to the exceptions set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. TOGETHER WITH all the eenemenis, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. -1- TO HAVE AND TO FIOLD, the same in fee simple forever. AND the Grantor hemby covenants with the said Grantee that is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; lhat it has good ribht and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that it hereby fully warrants the title to said land and witl defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claimin� by, throu�h or under the said Grantor, but not othenvise. IN WITNESS WHEREOP, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its seal to be aftixed hcreunto, affixed, by its proper officers, thereunto duly �uthorized, the day and year first above writtcn. In the Presence of: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PMELLAS RCTLAW-HERCULES, LLC, a Florida timited liability company By: ��i ��i �°'�--- (SEAL) ( �"� HARVEY F. GORTNER, Manager 0 I HEREI3Y CERTIFY that before me personaily appeared HARVEY F. GORTNER, MAna�er of RETLAW-HERCULES, LLC, a Florida limited liabiliry company, to mc persana i wn to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument or has produced as identification and ackno�vledged the execution thereof to be his free act and deed as Manager, for the uses and purposes therein expressed.. c� WITNESS my hand and official seal at Cleanvater, said County and State, this �% day of September, 2013. „ % J ` I 1 Notary Public , Print Name 1 �T��` My Commission Exp s: IL L1fM1 ktMT�l E� ~� � �p�ISSql1 t DD Nt52� .; F pcPIRES: Ju1Y t t. 201� - 2 - ewd.enwnonnwacuro.•�.+ EXHIBIT ��A" Lot 20 CLEARWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the map or nlat thereof as recorded in Plut Book 44, Pagc 46, Public Records of Pinellus County, Florida. -3- EXHIBIT "B" 1. Taxes for the year 2013, and subsequent years, which are not yet due and payable. 2. Easements and other matters shown on the plat of CLEARWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 44, Page(s) 46, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicatin� a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, cotor, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c). 3. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, including any amendments or modifications thereto, recorded in Book 115, Page 347, amended in Book 169, Page 542; Book 680, Page 63 and Book 2914, Page 516, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions vialate 42 USC 3604(c). 4. Terms and copditions of the Covenant between Gagne Wallcovering, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Gagne") and Retlaw-Hercules, LLC, a Florida limited liability company {"Retlaw") recorded in Book 14952, Page 1455, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 5. Terms and conditions of the Non-Exclusive Easement between Gagne Wallcovering, Inc., a Florida corporation and Retlaw-Hercules, LLC, a Florida limited liability company recorded in Book 14952, Page 1465, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. N:1D,o.w�WltutF�n.►wN�.teuakns.Mw�asrEC.eoe _4_ DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR CENTRAL WAREHOUSE Prepared For: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization 503 Cleveland St. Clearwater, FL 33755 Prepared By: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 2601 Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 Sarasota, Florida 34232 March 2014 Project No: 148128033 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT NARRATIVE ENGINEER’S CERTIFICATION APPENDICES APPENDIX A WATER QUANTITY/WATER QUALITY APPENDIX B UNDERDRAIN DRAWDOWN CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C STORM SEWER TABULATIONS APPENDIX D FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS – ICPR MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT ON DVD EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 PROPERTY DEED EXHIBIT 2 SWFWMD PRE-APPLICATION MEETING EXHIBIT 3 UNIVERSAL, SOILS REPORT EXHIBIT 4 FEMA FIRMETTE FLOODPLAIN MAP EXHIBIT 5 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS GUIDELINES EXHIBIT 6 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES GUIDELINES 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE I.BACKGROUND The Central Warehouse project site, hereafter referred to as “the project”, is located in Section 1 Township 29S Range 15E in Pinellas County, Florida. More specifically, the property is located at 2005 Calumet Street, Clearwater, Florida 33765. The subject property owned by the applicant contains a single 3.75 acre parcel. Please refer to the property deed included as Exhibit 1. The proposed redevelopment project consists of the demolition of the existing structures and construction of an 88,747 square foot warehouse, associated parking, utilities and a stormwater management system. The project will be constructed in a single phase. A pre-application meeting was held with the Southwest Florida Water Management District on February 20, 2014. Pre-application meeting minutes are provided Exhibit 2. II.EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject property lies within the Alligator Creek Watershed in Pinellas County. The parcel currently consists of a one story commercial building fronting Hercules Avenue and a one story masonry building at the Southeast corner of the parcel. Under existing conditions, the site drains to a segment of Alligator Creek, Channel A, which runs along and within the south side of the parcel within a 50’ drainage easement. The City of Clearwater, in conjunction with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), has developed a Watershed Management Plan for Alligator Creek. The ICPR drainage model, developed by Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc. was obtained by Kimley-Horn and updated with site specific survey information to create the existing conditions model. Existing conditions hydrology calculations are included in Appendix A. The existing conditions model will be used in comparison with the proposed conditions model to demonstrate that adequate floodplain compensation is provided by the proposed system. III. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The proposed site consists of 3.26 acres. The existing drainage easement for Channel A contains the remaining 0.49 acres of parcel area. Redevelopment consists of the demolition of the existing on-site structures and construction of an 88,747 square foot warehouse, associated parking, utilities and a stormwater management system. Offsite improvements consist of the driveway connection to Hercules Avenue, driveway connection to Calumet Street and sidewalk along Calumet Street. The following 2 sections discuss how the proposed design addresses stormwater quantity, stormwater quality treatment, storm sewer design and floodplain analysis. Water Quantity (Attenuation) Stormwater runoff will be captured through an onsite conveyance system which will discharge to dry detention pond located adjacent to the north and west side of the proposed warehouse. The proposed outfall control structure located in the southwestern dry retention pond will discharge to Channel A. The proposed development has been designed such that the post-development discharge rate for the 25-year storm does not exceed the allowable pre-development discharge rate. The pre-development discharge rate (Qpre) is based on City of Clearwater stormwater criteria which are more stringent than the 25-year discharge rate required by SWFWMD. For calculations of the 25-year Qpre & Qpost, and the attenuation weir sizing calculations please refer to Appendix A. Water Quality (Treatment) In accordance with City of Clearwater, which also meets or exceeds Southwest Florida Water Management District design criteria, on-site runoff from the project area will be treated via a dry detention system with effluent underdrain. Water quality volume was determined based on ½-inch of runoff generated from the contributing area. To provide a positive drainage outfall and to prevent the use of stormwater pumps for the truck dock, the trench drain located at the bottom of the truck dock is designed to discharge directly to Channel A. Approximately 1,300 square feet of untreated truck dock area will be offset by providing compensatory treatment for approximately 1,900 square feet of offsite contributing area consisting of the proposed sidewalk along Calumet Street. Please refer to Appendix A for water quality treatment volume calculations The proposed underdrain is designed to draw down the treatment depth within 24-hours. Please refer to Appendix B for underdrain drawdown calculations. The proposed underdrain system will be wrapped with an impervious HDPE liner to provide structural separation from the groundwater table. The hydrological parameters for Seasonal High Water Table are based on the Geotechnical estimation prepared by Universal Engineering Services. Refer to the underdrain calculations provided in Appendix B. For a copy of the Geotechnical Report, please refer to Exhibit 3. The subject site is located with WBID 1574 impaired for dissolved oxygen (D.O.), fecal coliform and nutrients. The current land use is industrial. Prior to site demolition in 2011, the site contained a large office building and a large warehouse. Currently the office building remains on site along with a small out-building, surface parking, and remnant asphalt parking from the demolished warehouse. The existing 3 site does not contain a formal stormwater management system. Runoff from the site flows untreated into Alligator Creek vial sheet flow and/or shallow concentrated flow. Based on the Alligator Creek Watershed modeling obtained from SWFMD, the existing contributing basins for this project have a time of concentration (Tc) ranging from 6 to 7 hours. The existing land use for the subject property is not changing with the proposed project. However, the impervious coverage increases slightly under the proposed conditions. Based on the proposed dry retention system, presumptive criteria will provide a net improvement for D.O. and fecal coliform. The proposed stormwater management system also increases residence time for stormwater runoff. Under existing conditions, runoff takes 6-7 hours (existing Tc) to reach Alligator Creek and experiences peak runoff at hour 12. The proposed dry retention pond draws down the treatment volume within 24 hours and limits discharge to the existing conditions discharge rate. In addition, plantings are incorporated in the dry retention to provide nutrient uptake and site buffering. Therefore, based on the proposed dry retention system meeting presumptive criteria, increasing residence time and providing nutrient uptake through plantings, a net improvement is provided to Alligator Creek. Storm Sewer Tabulations The storm sewer system has been designed to handle the 25-year/24-hour peak flow rate. For Hydraulic grade line calculations please refer to Appendix C. Floodplain: Upon review Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Pinellas County, Florida, panel 107, there is a designated regulatory floodplain on the property. The FIRM panel indicates that the project lies within Zone X500 and within Zone AE. Zone X500 is defined as areas between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year flood. Zone AE has a Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of 50.00 ft (NAVD 88). Refer to EXHIBIT 4 for a firmette copy of the FEMA FIRM Panel. Floodplain Encroachment: The proposed development encroaches into the FEMA floodplain. Compensation through modeling will be provided to demonstrate no adverse offsite impacts due to encroachment. Floodplain Compensation: Based on discussions with SWFWMD, the best available information for determining floodplain compensation is the Alligator Creek Watershed Model. Kimley-Horn obtained the watershed model 4 through SWFWMD to analyze the existing and proposed conditions for the 100-year/24-hour storm event with respect to the published base flood elevation. For existing conditions, survey information was used to update the culvert under Hercules Avenue and the culvert immediately downstream of the project (links RA0470A, RA0450A & RA0450B). The basins associated with this property were checked for general conformance with the site topography (see A2910, A2940, A0440, A0450, & A0460). The 100-year simulation was run to determine the peak flood elevations for the watershed. For proposed conditions, the existing conditions model was updated to incorporate the site basin, proposed dry retention system and control structure (see A0460_SITE). The surrounding basins areas were reduced accordingly with the proposed site basin delineation (see A2910, A2940, A0440, A0450, & A0460). Stage area reductions for the surrounding basins were determined using topographical information obtained from the existing site survey. The 100-year simulation was run to determine the peak flood elevations for the watershed. A direct comparison of existing and proposed flood stages has been prepared to demonstrate that the proposed encroachment associated with this project does not increase the peak flood stages of the surrounding property above the published BFE (50.00’ NAVD 88). Based on the modeling, the proposed project does not increase the flood elevations of surrounding basins above the published BFE. Therefore the proposed site does not create an adverse impact to the floodplain. Please refer to Appendix D for a pre/post comparison of 100-year flood elevations throughout the watershed. Floodway There is a designated regulatory floodway associated with Channel A. FEMA defines the regulatory floodway as “...that portion of the floodplain which is effective in carrying flow, within which this carrying capacity must be preserved and where the flood hazard is generally highest, i.e.,where water depths and velocities are the greatest. It is that area which provides for the discharge of the base flood so the cumulative increase in water surface elevation is no more than one foot.” Based on our review of the FEMA Map, the existing site survey and the floodway definition, the floodway is the portion of the floodplain located in the existing Channel A, i.e. from top of bank to top of bank. It is within Channel A that the depths and velocities are the greatest. Based on the survey, Channel A is contained within the existing 50’ drainage easement. There is no proposed filling or loss of conveyance in Channel A associated with this project. 5 Environmental Considerations This project is a redevelopment of an existing industrial site with an urbanized area. There are no anticipated environmental impacts associated with the project. Operation & Maintenance For operation and maintenance guidelines for the proposed stormwater management system, please refer to Exhibit 5. Best Management Practices Guidelines For erosion control measures, please refer to the Best Management Practices plans and details included in the permit plans. Also refer to the Best Management Practices Guidelines Manual included as Exhibit 6. K:\SAR_URG\148128033 - COS Central Warehouse\KHA_ADMIN\Reports\Drainage Report - SWFWMD\SWFWMD\03 Project Description.doc THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ENCLOSED ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS WERE PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. _______________________________ TIMOTHY E. ROANE, P.E. #63113 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2601 Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 Sarasota, Florida 34232 C.A. 00000696 DATE:__________________________ APPENDIX A WATER QUANTITY/WATER QUALITY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:SRS Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: INFLOW / OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH Area =3.26 Ac C(post)0.85 Q(allowable) =2.80 cfs Tc =10 Min Time (min) Intensity (in/hr) Inflow (cf) Outflow (cf)Storage (cf) 10 8.4 13981 1677 12304 15 7.3 18225 2516 15710 20 6.4 21304 3354 17950 30 5.4 26963 5031 21932 40 4.6 30625 6709 23917 50 4.1 34120 8386 25735 60 3.7 36451 10063 26388 90 2.8 41943 15094 26849 120 2.35 46936 20126 26811 180 1.75 52429 30189 22240 Max Storage Required =26849 cf STAGE / STORAGE Pond STAGE (FT)AREA (SF)AREA (AC)STORAGE (CF)LS VOL. (CF)NET VOL. CF Overflow El. =50.5 16518 0.38 41,959 58 41901 TOB El. =50.00 15111 0.35 34,052 49 34002 Attenuation EL. =49.51 13883 0.32 26948 41 26907 Treatment EL. =47.70 9345 0.21 5927 12 5916 Bottom EL. =47.00 7590 0.17 0 0 0 CENTRAL WAREHOUSE KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:SRS Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128023 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: TOTAL QUALITY & QUANTITY WATER CALCULATIONS 141,900 SF 0.70 IN 5,913 CF 5,916 CF 26,849 CF (INCLUDES TREATEMENT VOLUME) 26,907 CF > Attenuation Volume Required WEIR DESIGN 49.71 FT 49.51 FT 47.70 FT 1.81 FT 2.80 cfs 0.36 FT Q(pre) = L=Q/(3.2*H^1.5) = H = GRATE ELEV. = TOP OF WEIR ELEV. = BOTTOM OF WEIR ELEV. = CENTRAL WAREHOUSE DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = PROVIDED WATER QUALITY IN POND = REQUIRED ATTENUATION VOLUME = TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED . KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By: 2601 Cattlemen Road Job No.:148128033 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Date:03/12/14 (941) 379-7600 Rev: PROJECT: Use the orifice equation to check if the flow area is adequate to convey the peak discharge rate. Q =CA e2gH H ч 0.01 C =0.60 g =32.2 Q =Peak discharge rate Q =ї A = L x W POND QPOND QSKIMMER ID cfs L (ft)W (ft)cfs POND 4.11 5 1.75 4.21 OK Skimmer H discharge RCP W W Notes to designer: a) Skimmer width W = 1.5' minimum b) Add 10 cfs to computed QSKIMMER to compensate for head losss c) Compute W from minimum in 3" increments 0.60 x A e64.4xH Post SIDE VIEWPLAN VIEW COS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE CONTROL STRUCTURE SKIMMER BLADE HYDRAULICS SKIMMER Check L WEIR Skimmer area Overflow Weir K:\SAR_URG\148128033 - COS Central Warehouse\ENGINEERING\Hydrology\Post- Dev\SkimmerCalc's_012014SRS.xls APPENDIX B UNDERDRAIN DRAWDOWN Underdrain Drawdown Analysis Project Name:COS Central Warehouse Project No.: Water Level Elevation (ft NGVD)Total Head (ft) Total Volume (cf) Incremental Volume Change (cf) Hydraulic Gradient (i=h/L2) Area of Filter (ft) Flow Rate (cfh) Average Flow Rate (cfh) Incremental Drawdown Time (hrs) Total Drawdown Time (hrs) h V Vinc "i"A Q Qave Tinc Ttot 47.72 2.97 6237.00 0.00 1.49 52.50 292.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.67 2.92 2749.72 3487.28 1.46 52.50 287.63 290.00 12.03 12.03 47.62 2.87 2709.23 40.49 1.44 52.50 282.91 285.27 0.14 12.17 47.58 2.83 2644.75 64.48 1.41 52.50 278.18 280.55 0.23 12.40 47.53 2.78 2556.28 88.47 1.39 52.50 273.46 275.82 0.32 12.72 47.48 2.73 2443.83 112.45 1.36 52.50 268.73 271.10 0.41 13.13 47.43 2.68 2307.39 136.44 1.34 52.50 264.01 266.37 0.51 13.64 47.38 2.63 2146.96 160.43 1.32 52.50 259.28 261.65 0.61 14.26 47.34 2.59 1962.55 184.41 1.29 52.50 254.56 256.92 0.72 14.98 47.29 2.54 1754.15 208.40 1.27 52.50 249.83 252.20 0.83 15.80 47.24 2.49 1521.76 232.39 1.24 52.50 245.11 247.47 0.94 16.74 47.19 2.44 1265.38 256.38 1.22 52.50 240.38 242.75 1.06 17.80 47.14 2.39 985.02 280.36 1.20 52.50 235.66 238.02 1.18 18.98 47.10 2.35 680.67 304.35 1.17 52.50 230.93 233.30 1.30 20.28 47.05 2.30 352.33 328.34 1.15 52.50 226.21 228.57 1.44 21.72 47.00 2.25 0.00 352.33 1.13 52.50 221.48 223.85 1.57 23.29 Center line of underdrain (ft NGVD)44.75 47.72 Pond bottom (ft NGVD)47.00 Diameter of underdrain (ft)0.50 Length of underdrain (ft)35.00 Width of underdrain filter bed 1.50 Filter material "K" value (ft/hr)3.75 6237 Area at top of treatment volume (sf)93.95 Area at pond bottom (sf)7590 Depth of filter media (ft)2.00 07/10/03Revision Date Top of treatment volume/weir elevation (ft NGVD) Volume between pond bottom and top of treatment volume/weir elevation (cf) 148128033 APPENDIX C STORM SEWER TABULATIONS COS - Central Warehouse DATE:03/12/14 STORM SEWER TABULATION KHA JOB#:148128033 25 Year Storm Event FRICTION HEAD LOSS = 29 * N² * V²/2g * R^(-4/3) * L DRY POND PEAK RUNOFF =10.13cfs * TAILWATER =47.00ft AREA =3.28 Ac PRORATED RUNOFF =3.09 cfs / Ac PIPE INLET INLET TOTAL PIPE PIPE MANNING HGL FRIC SUM LOSS FORM HGL HGL LOW E/P FLOOD FROM AREA FLOW FLOW LENGTH DIAM N VEL SLOPE LOSS COEFF LOSS D / S U / S ELEV.DEPTH (--)(Ac)(cfs)(cfs)(ft)(in)(--)(ft/s)(%)(ft) 6. (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(in) S-4 0.19 0.60 0.60 35 24 0.012 0.19 0.001 0.000 0.001 47.12 47.12 49.50 N/A S-3 0.21 0.65 1.24 299 24 0.012 0.40 0.003 0.008 0.005 47.11 47.12 49.50 N/A S-2 1.01 3.11 4.35 123 24 0.012 1.39 0.031 0.039 0.068 47.00 47.11 49.50 N/A POND 1.87 5.78 10.13 CHECK 3.28 10.13 APPENDIX D FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. PROPOSED CONDITIONS ALLIGATOR CREEK FLOODPLAIN NODES HYDROGRAPHS BFE = 50.00' $$FILE$$ $$DATE$$ Simulation 24HR100YR St a g e ( f t ) Time(hrs) 0 20 40 60 80 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 NA0440 NA0450 NA0460 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT BNDRY1 0.10 BNDRY1 0.10 0.000 BNDRY10 39.31 BNDRY10 39.31 0.000 BNDRY11 71.97 BNDRY11 71.97 0.000 BNDRY12 69.40 BNDRY12 69.40 0.000 BNDRY13 69.00 BNDRY13 69.00 0.000 BNDRY14 63.07 BNDRY14 63.07 0.000 BNDRY15 6.28 BNDRY15 6.28 0.000 BNDRY16 58.00 BNDRY16 58.00 0.000 BNDRY17 54.78 BNDRY17 54.78 0.000 BNDRY18 63.81 BNDRY18 63.81 0.000 BNDRY19 85.03 BNDRY19 85.03 0.000 BNDRY2 68.20 BNDRY2 68.20 0.000 BNDRY20 86.70 BNDRY20 86.70 0.000 BNDRY21 94.06 BNDRY21 94.06 0.000 BNDRY22 71.00 BNDRY22 71.00 0.000 BNDRY23 66.10 BNDRY23 66.10 0.000 BNDRY24 92.00 BNDRY24 92.00 0.000 BNDRY25 17.30 BNDRY25 17.30 0.000 BNDRY26 51.00 BNDRY26 51.00 0.000 BNDRY3 91.40 BNDRY3 91.40 0.000 BNDRY4 58.64 BNDRY4 58.64 0.000 BNDRY5 59.33 BNDRY5 59.33 0.000 BNDRY6 73.96 BNDRY6 73.96 0.000 BNDRY7 52.25 BNDRY7 52.25 0.000 BNDRY8 73.05 BNDRY8 73.05 0.000 BNDRY9 72.95 BNDRY9 72.95 0.000 GW -10.00 GW -10.00 0.000 NA0010 8.01 NA0010 8.01 0.000 NA0020 11.86 NA0020 11.86 0.000 NA0030 12.38 NA0030 12.38 0.000 NA0040 13.06 NA0040 13.05 -0.010 NA0050 13.94 NA0050 13.94 0.000 NA0060 15.19 NA0060 15.19 0.000 NA0070 18.52 NA0070 18.52 0.000 NA0080 19.47 NA0080 19.47 0.000 NA0090 20.78 NA0090 20.78 0.000 NA0100 20.79 NA0100 20.79 0.000 NA0110 20.95 NA0110 20.95 0.000 NA0120 21.00 NA0120 21.00 0.000 NA0130 21.04 NA0130 21.04 0.000 NA0140 21.07 NA0140 21.07 0.000 NA0150 21.12 NA0150 21.12 0.000 NA0160 21.85 NA0160 21.85 0.000 NA0170 22.29 NA0170 22.29 0.000 NA0180 23.30 NA0180 23.29 -0.010 NA0190 24.57 NA0190 24.56 -0.010 NA0200 24.80 NA0200 24.79 -0.010 NA0210 25.10 NA0210 25.09 -0.010 NA0220 25.15 NA0220 25.15 0.000 NA0230 25.20 NA0230 25.20 0.000 NA0240 25.38 NA0240 25.38 0.000 NA0250 25.71 NA0250 25.71 0.000 NA0260 26.98 NA0260 26.98 0.000 NA0270 28.38 NA0270 28.38 0.000 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA0280 29.58 NA0280 29.58 0.000 NA0290 29.74 NA0290 29.74 0.000 NA0300 31.14 NA0300 31.14 0.000 NA0310 31.17 NA0310 31.17 0.000 NA0320 34.72 NA0320 34.71 -0.010 NA0330 34.96 NA0330 34.96 0.000 NA0340 35.77 NA0340 35.77 0.000 NA0350 39.34 NA0350 39.34 0.000 NA0360 39.55 NA0360 39.54 -0.010 NA0370 40.01 NA0370 40.00 -0.010 NA0380 41.21 NA0380 41.21 0.000 NA0390 41.66 NA0390 41.66 0.000 NA0400 43.42 NA0400 43.42 0.000 NA0410 43.60 NA0410 43.60 0.000 NA0420 46.73 NA0420 46.73 0.000 NA0430 47.61 NA0430 47.62 0.010 NA0440 49.24 NA0440 49.25 0.010 NA0450 49.59 NA0450 49.61 0.020 BELOW PUBLISHED FEMA BFE NA0460 49.92 NA0460 49.94 0.020 BELOW FEMA BFE 50.0 NA NA NA0460_SITE 50.47 NA COS WAREHOUSE SITE NA0470 50.82 NA0470 50.83 0.010 NA0480 50.87 NA0480 50.88 0.010 NA0490 50.88 NA0490 50.88 0.000 NA0500 50.88 NA0500 50.89 0.010 NA0510 51.35 NA0510 51.35 0.000 NA0520 51.38 NA0520 51.39 0.010 NA0530 51.41 NA0530 51.42 0.010 NA0540 51.43 NA0540 51.43 0.000 NA0550 51.48 NA0550 51.48 0.000 NA0560 51.48 NA0560 51.49 0.010 NA0570 51.51 NA0570 51.51 0.000 NA0580 51.58 NA0580 51.58 0.000 NA0590 51.72 NA0590 51.72 0.000 NA0600 53.85 NA0600 53.85 0.000 NA0610 53.96 NA0610 53.96 0.000 NA0620 53.99 NA0620 53.99 0.000 NA0630 54.06 NA0630 54.06 0.000 NA0640 54.97 NA0640 54.97 0.000 NA0650 8.01 NA0650 8.01 0.000 NA0660 14.37 NA0660 14.37 0.000 NA0670 12.69 NA0670 12.69 0.000 NA0680 8.02 NA0680 8.02 0.000 NA0690 8.92 NA0690 8.92 0.000 NA0700 33.64 NA0700 33.64 0.000 NA0710 12.81 NA0710 12.81 0.000 NA0720 27.91 NA0720 27.91 0.000 NA0730 8.30 NA0730 8.30 0.000 NA0740 12.81 NA0740 12.81 0.000 NA0750 8.01 NA0750 8.01 0.000 NA0760 10.07 NA0760 10.07 0.000 NA0770 13.56 NA0770 13.56 0.000 NA0780 14.81 NA0780 14.81 0.000 NA0790 17.16 NA0790 17.16 0.000 NA0800 18.02 NA0800 18.02 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA0810 18.16 NA0810 18.16 0.000 NA0820 15.81 NA0820 15.81 0.000 NA0830 17.03 NA0830 17.03 0.000 NA0840 18.04 NA0840 18.04 0.000 NA0850 18.49 NA0850 18.49 0.000 NA0860 18.82 NA0860 18.82 0.000 NA0870 14.88 NA0870 14.88 0.000 NA0880 46.34 NA0880 46.34 0.000 NA0890 8.00 NA0890 8.00 0.000 NA0900 7.98 NA0900 7.98 0.000 NA0903 7.83 NA0903 7.83 0.000 NA0907 7.58 NA0907 7.58 0.000 NA0910 9.98 NA0910 9.98 0.000 NA0920 10.86 NA0920 10.86 0.000 NA0930 13.27 NA0930 13.27 0.000 NA0940 14.52 NA0940 14.52 0.000 NA0950 16.36 NA0950 16.36 0.000 NA0960 22.37 NA0960 22.37 0.000 NA0970 21.50 NA0970 21.50 0.000 NA0980 19.76 NA0980 19.76 0.000 NA0990 23.05 NA0990 23.05 0.000 NA1000 37.49 NA1000 37.49 0.000 NA1010 23.08 NA1010 23.08 0.000 NA1020 38.15 NA1020 38.15 0.000 NA1030 39.41 NA1030 39.41 0.000 NA1040 44.18 NA1040 44.18 0.000 NA1050 19.47 NA1050 19.47 0.000 NA1055 19.47 NA1055 19.47 0.000 NA1060 19.47 NA1060 19.47 0.000 NA1070 21.93 NA1070 21.93 0.000 NA1080 19.47 NA1080 19.47 0.000 NA1090 29.00 NA1090 29.00 0.000 NA1100 31.50 NA1100 31.50 0.000 NA1110 30.24 NA1110 30.24 0.000 NA1120 28.15 NA1120 28.15 0.000 NA1130 29.98 NA1130 29.98 0.000 NA1140 36.99 NA1140 36.99 0.000 NA1150 38.75 NA1150 38.75 0.000 NA1160 21.06 NA1160 21.06 0.000 NA1170 29.87 NA1170 29.87 0.000 NA1180 21.01 NA1180 21.01 0.000 NA1190 21.11 NA1190 21.11 0.000 NA1200 21.90 NA1200 21.89 -0.010 NA1210 21.11 NA1210 21.11 0.000 NA1220 21.57 NA1220 21.57 0.000 NA1230 23.39 NA1230 23.39 0.000 NA1240 21.17 NA1240 21.17 0.000 NA1250 21.20 NA1250 21.20 0.000 NA1260 21.20 NA1260 21.20 0.000 NA1270 21.86 NA1270 21.86 0.000 NA1280 21.87 NA1280 21.87 0.000 NA1290 22.25 NA1290 22.25 0.000 NA1300 24.64 NA1300 24.64 0.000 NA1310 24.78 NA1310 24.77 -0.010 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA1320 30.06 NA1320 30.06 0.000 NA1330 32.78 NA1330 32.78 0.000 NA1340 35.97 NA1340 35.97 0.000 NA1360 50.00 NA1360 50.00 0.000 NA1370 52.32 NA1370 52.32 0.000 NA1380 52.34 NA1380 52.34 0.000 NA1390 52.65 NA1390 52.65 0.000 NA1400 52.74 NA1400 52.74 0.000 NA1410 54.66 NA1410 54.66 0.000 NA1420 58.17 NA1420 58.17 0.000 NA1430 52.76 NA1430 52.76 0.000 NA1440 25.43 NA1440 25.43 0.000 NA1450 25.40 NA1450 25.40 0.000 NA1460 26.51 NA1460 26.51 0.000 NA1470 31.10 NA1470 31.10 0.000 NA1480 32.54 NA1480 32.54 0.000 NA1490 39.46 NA1490 39.46 0.000 NA1500 40.29 NA1500 40.29 0.000 NA1510 41.93 NA1510 41.93 0.000 NA1520 43.15 NA1520 43.15 0.000 NA1530 45.00 NA1530 45.00 0.000 NA1540 44.70 NA1540 44.70 0.000 NA1550 52.11 NA1550 52.11 0.000 NA1560 52.64 NA1560 52.64 0.000 NA1570 50.15 NA1570 50.15 0.000 NA1580 55.67 NA1580 55.67 0.000 NA1590 54.65 NA1590 54.65 0.000 NA1600 31.95 NA1600 31.95 0.000 NA1610 51.23 NA1610 51.23 0.000 NA1620 52.87 NA1620 52.87 0.000 NA1630 33.06 NA1630 33.06 0.000 NA1640 33.33 NA1640 33.33 0.000 NA1650 45.43 NA1650 45.43 0.000 NA1660 52.14 NA1660 52.14 0.000 NA1670 55.62 NA1670 55.62 0.000 NA1680 25.42 NA1680 25.42 0.000 NA1690 25.42 NA1690 25.42 0.000 NA1700 27.07 NA1700 27.07 0.000 NA1710 24.72 NA1710 24.72 0.000 NA1720 24.71 NA1720 24.71 0.000 NA1730 24.72 NA1730 24.71 -0.010 NA1740 24.81 NA1740 24.81 0.000 NA1750 25.08 NA1750 25.07 -0.010 NA1760 25.64 NA1760 25.64 0.000 NA1770 28.09 NA1770 28.09 0.000 NA1780 29.21 NA1780 29.21 0.000 NA1790 29.70 NA1790 29.70 0.000 NA1800 29.93 NA1800 29.93 0.000 NA1810 28.36 NA1810 28.36 0.000 NA1820 28.36 NA1820 28.36 0.000 NA1830 41.78 NA1830 41.78 0.000 NA1840 53.46 NA1840 53.46 0.000 NA1850 72.22 NA1850 72.22 0.000 NA1860 72.52 NA1860 72.52 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA1870 73.10 NA1870 73.10 0.000 NA1880 73.97 NA1880 73.97 0.000 NA1890 73.95 NA1890 73.95 0.000 NA1900 73.95 NA1900 73.95 0.000 NA1910 51.21 NA1910 51.21 0.000 NA1920 40.82 NA1920 40.82 0.000 NA1930 55.20 NA1930 55.20 0.000 NA1940 29.77 NA1940 29.77 0.000 NA1950 35.36 NA1950 35.36 0.000 NA1960 36.12 NA1960 36.12 0.000 NA1970 37.79 NA1970 37.79 0.000 NA1980 40.03 NA1980 40.03 0.000 NA1990 44.06 NA1990 44.06 0.000 NA2000 46.96 NA2000 46.96 0.000 NA2010 49.04 NA2010 49.04 0.000 NA2020 50.43 NA2020 50.43 0.000 NA2030 52.77 NA2030 52.77 0.000 NA2040 58.53 NA2040 58.53 0.000 NA2050 60.61 NA2050 60.61 0.000 NA2060 62.34 NA2060 62.34 0.000 NA2070 67.16 NA2070 67.16 0.000 NA2080 67.37 NA2080 67.37 0.000 NA2090 68.22 NA2090 68.22 0.000 NA2100 69.31 NA2100 69.31 0.000 NA2110 69.45 NA2110 69.45 0.000 NA2120 69.46 NA2120 69.46 0.000 NA2130 69.48 NA2130 69.48 0.000 NA2140 69.66 NA2140 69.66 0.000 NA2150 70.06 NA2150 70.06 0.000 NA2160 69.95 NA2160 69.95 0.000 NA2170 70.04 NA2170 70.04 0.000 NA2180 69.83 NA2180 69.83 0.000 NA2190 69.83 NA2190 69.83 0.000 NA2200 69.83 NA2200 69.83 0.000 NA2210 69.83 NA2210 69.83 0.000 NA2220 45.56 NA2220 45.56 0.000 NA2230 52.29 NA2230 52.29 0.000 NA2240 57.13 NA2240 57.13 0.000 NA2250 60.31 NA2250 60.31 0.000 NA2260 62.40 NA2260 62.40 0.000 NA2270 66.43 NA2270 66.43 0.000 NA2280 67.70 NA2280 67.70 0.000 NA2290 69.23 NA2290 69.23 0.000 NA2300 69.99 NA2300 69.99 0.000 NA2310 71.37 NA2310 71.37 0.000 NA2320 66.64 NA2320 66.64 0.000 NA2330 47.45 NA2330 47.45 0.000 NA2340 51.01 NA2340 51.01 0.000 NA2345 51.77 NA2345 51.77 0.000 NA2350 51.77 NA2350 51.77 0.000 NA2360 47.32 NA2360 47.32 0.000 NA2370 50.54 NA2370 50.54 0.000 NA2380 55.84 NA2380 55.84 0.000 NA2390 57.30 NA2390 57.30 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA2400 58.12 NA2400 58.12 0.000 NA2410 58.76 NA2410 58.76 0.000 NA2420 56.13 NA2420 56.13 0.000 NA2430 60.15 NA2430 60.15 0.000 NA2440 58.00 NA2440 58.00 0.000 NA2450 62.42 NA2450 62.42 0.000 NA2460 55.88 NA2460 55.88 0.000 NA2470 54.96 NA2470 54.96 0.000 NA2480 52.50 NA2480 52.50 0.000 NA2490 61.50 NA2490 61.50 0.000 NA2500 60.18 NA2500 60.18 0.000 NA2510 63.41 NA2510 63.41 0.000 NA2520 65.84 NA2520 65.84 0.000 NA2530 69.09 NA2530 69.09 0.000 NA2540 69.11 NA2540 69.11 0.000 NA2550 69.41 NA2550 69.41 0.000 NA2560 69.44 NA2560 69.44 0.000 NA2570 69.43 NA2570 69.43 0.000 NA2580 69.69 NA2580 69.69 0.000 NA2590 59.25 NA2590 59.25 0.000 NA2600 59.42 NA2600 59.42 0.000 NA2610 65.84 NA2610 65.84 0.000 NA2620 69.53 NA2620 69.53 0.000 NA2630 69.52 NA2630 69.52 0.000 NA2640 63.40 NA2640 63.40 0.000 NA2650 68.39 NA2650 68.39 0.000 NA2660 69.44 NA2660 69.44 0.000 NA2670 69.68 NA2670 69.68 0.000 NA2680 69.46 NA2680 69.46 0.000 NA2690 69.46 NA2690 69.46 0.000 NA2700 69.98 NA2700 69.98 0.000 NA2710 70.65 NA2710 70.65 0.000 NA2720 71.71 NA2720 71.71 0.000 NA2730 72.03 NA2730 72.03 0.000 NA2740 69.83 NA2740 69.83 0.000 NA2750 60.98 NA2750 60.98 0.000 NA2760 64.76 NA2760 64.76 0.000 NA2770 69.53 NA2770 69.53 0.000 NA2780 71.31 NA2780 71.31 0.000 NA2790 37.70 NA2790 37.70 0.000 NA2800 35.77 NA2800 35.77 0.000 NA2810 39.42 NA2810 39.42 0.000 NA2820 40.26 NA2820 40.26 0.000 NA2830 39.72 NA2830 39.71 -0.010 NA2840 43.69 NA2840 43.68 -0.010 NA2850 44.75 NA2850 44.75 0.000 NA2860 50.19 NA2860 50.19 0.000 NA2870 46.74 NA2870 46.74 0.000 NA2880 49.73 NA2880 49.73 0.000 NA2890 47.38 NA2890 47.38 0.000 NA2900 49.15 NA2900 49.15 0.000 NA2910 49.30 NA2910 49.30 0.000 NA2920 50.07 NA2920 50.07 0.000 NA2930 49.41 NA2930 49.42 0.010 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA2940 50.19 NA2940 50.19 0.000 NA2950 52.08 NA2950 52.08 0.000 NA2960 52.26 NA2960 52.26 0.000 NA2970 52.64 NA2970 52.64 0.000 NA2980 53.38 NA2980 53.38 0.000 NA2990 54.27 NA2990 54.27 0.000 NA3000 57.04 NA3000 57.04 0.000 NA3010 58.10 NA3010 58.10 0.000 NA3020 59.62 NA3020 59.62 0.000 NA3030 59.64 NA3030 59.64 0.000 NA3040 60.85 NA3040 60.85 0.000 NA3050 63.61 NA3050 63.61 0.000 NA3060 65.36 NA3060 65.36 0.000 NA3070 58.39 NA3070 58.39 0.000 NA3080 51.98 NA3080 51.98 0.000 NA3090 52.07 NA3090 52.07 0.000 NA3100 53.06 NA3100 53.06 0.000 NA3110 53.18 NA3110 53.18 0.000 NA3120 53.38 NA3120 53.38 0.000 NA3130 55.75 NA3130 55.75 0.000 NA3140 57.56 NA3140 57.56 0.000 NA3150 51.26 NA3150 51.27 0.010 NA3160 57.18 NA3160 57.18 0.000 NA3170 60.85 NA3170 60.85 0.000 NA3180 63.00 NA3180 63.00 0.000 NA3190 67.14 NA3190 67.14 0.000 NA3200 67.18 NA3200 67.18 0.000 NA3210 67.23 NA3210 67.23 0.000 NA3220 67.04 NA3220 67.04 0.000 NA3230 67.03 NA3230 67.03 0.000 NA3240 67.59 NA3240 67.59 0.000 NA3250 67.72 NA3250 67.72 0.000 NA3260 68.58 NA3260 68.58 0.000 NA3270 68.96 NA3270 68.96 0.000 NA3280 69.18 NA3280 69.18 0.000 NA3290 69.73 NA3290 69.73 0.000 NA3300 60.75 NA3300 60.75 0.000 NA3310 67.42 NA3310 67.42 0.000 NA3320 68.38 NA3320 68.38 0.000 NA3330 68.42 NA3330 68.42 0.000 NA3340 69.09 NA3340 69.09 0.000 NA3350 57.30 NA3350 57.30 0.000 NA3360 58.46 NA3360 58.46 0.000 NA3370 59.25 NA3370 59.25 0.000 NA3380 66.98 NA3380 66.98 0.000 NA3390 67.20 NA3390 67.20 0.000 NA3400 66.91 NA3400 66.91 0.000 NA3410 67.02 NA3410 67.02 0.000 NA3420 68.59 NA3420 68.59 0.000 NA3430 68.18 NA3430 68.18 0.000 NA3440 69.49 NA3440 69.49 0.000 NA3450 68.94 NA3450 68.94 0.000 NA3460 50.87 NA3460 50.88 0.010 NA3470 50.91 NA3470 50.91 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA3480 51.63 NA3480 51.63 0.000 NA3490 52.96 NA3490 52.96 0.000 NA3500 51.83 NA3500 51.83 0.000 NA3510 50.92 NA3510 50.93 0.010 NA3520 50.88 NA3520 50.89 0.010 NA3530 51.98 NA3530 51.98 0.000 NA3540 51.38 NA3540 51.39 0.010 NA3550 52.11 NA3550 52.11 0.000 NA3560 52.62 NA3560 52.62 0.000 NA3570 53.37 NA3570 53.37 0.000 NA3580 55.19 NA3580 55.19 0.000 NA3590 56.37 NA3590 56.37 0.000 NA3600 57.90 NA3600 57.90 0.000 NA3610 58.66 NA3610 58.66 0.000 NA3620 59.21 NA3620 59.21 0.000 NA3630 60.22 NA3630 60.22 0.000 NA3640 62.75 NA3640 62.75 0.000 NA3650 63.08 NA3650 63.08 0.000 NA3660 63.81 NA3660 63.81 0.000 NA3670 63.50 NA3670 63.50 0.000 NA3680 59.19 NA3680 59.19 0.000 NA3690 60.09 NA3690 60.09 0.000 NA3700 62.81 NA3700 62.81 0.000 NA3710 63.22 NA3710 63.22 0.000 NA3720 52.60 NA3720 52.60 0.000 NA3730 53.72 NA3730 53.72 0.000 NA3740 55.54 NA3740 55.54 0.000 NA3750 57.42 NA3750 57.42 0.000 NA3760 58.30 NA3760 58.30 0.000 NA3770 60.01 NA3770 60.01 0.000 NA3780 59.99 NA3780 59.99 0.000 NA3790 60.23 NA3790 60.23 0.000 NA3800 60.92 NA3800 60.92 0.000 NA3810 60.63 NA3810 60.63 0.000 NA3820 60.62 NA3820 60.62 0.000 NA3830 51.49 NA3830 51.49 0.000 NA3840 52.74 NA3840 52.74 0.000 NA3850 52.81 NA3850 52.81 0.000 NA3860 53.68 NA3860 53.68 0.000 NA3870 55.47 NA3870 55.47 0.000 NA3880 58.91 NA3880 58.91 0.000 NA3920 55.18 NA3920 55.18 0.000 NA3930 57.24 NA3930 57.24 0.000 NA3940 51.79 NA3940 51.79 0.000 NA3950 51.53 NA3950 51.53 0.000 NA3960 53.88 NA3960 53.88 0.000 NA3970 55.85 NA3970 55.85 0.000 NA3980 56.05 NA3980 56.05 0.000 NA3990 57.77 NA3990 57.77 0.000 NA4000 58.37 NA4000 58.37 0.000 NA4010 58.48 NA4010 58.48 0.000 NA4020 58.51 NA4020 58.51 0.000 NA4030 59.30 NA4030 59.30 0.000 NA4040 56.10 NA4040 56.10 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NA4050 56.10 NA4050 56.10 0.000 NA4060 56.28 NA4060 56.28 0.000 NA4070 59.11 NA4070 59.11 0.000 NA4080 56.15 NA4080 56.15 0.000 NA4090 55.33 NA4090 55.33 0.000 NA4100 56.64 NA4100 56.64 0.000 NA4110 38.15 NA4110 38.15 0.000 NB0010 22.30 NB0010 22.30 0.000 NB0020 22.30 NB0020 22.30 0.000 NB0030 27.02 NB0030 27.02 0.000 NB0040 29.09 NB0040 29.09 0.000 NB0050 34.57 NB0050 34.57 0.000 NB0060 40.72 NB0060 40.72 0.000 NB0070 47.63 NB0070 47.63 0.000 NB0080 50.30 NB0080 50.30 0.000 NB0090 51.22 NB0090 51.22 0.000 NB0100 53.07 NB0100 53.07 0.000 NB0110 53.68 NB0110 53.68 0.000 NB0120 54.13 NB0120 54.13 0.000 NB0130 54.82 NB0130 54.82 0.000 NB0140 55.26 NB0140 55.26 0.000 NB0150 55.44 NB0150 55.44 0.000 NB0160 55.47 NB0160 55.47 0.000 NB0170 55.56 NB0170 55.56 0.000 NB0180 55.58 NB0180 55.58 0.000 NB0190 55.78 NB0190 55.78 0.000 NB0200 56.46 NB0200 56.46 0.000 NB0210 56.98 NB0210 56.98 0.000 NB0220 59.65 NB0220 59.65 0.000 NB0230 59.67 NB0230 59.67 0.000 NB0240 64.10 NB0240 64.10 0.000 NB0250 71.00 NB0250 71.00 0.000 NB0260 73.24 NB0260 73.24 0.000 NB0270 75.34 NB0270 75.34 0.000 NB0280 82.61 NB0280 82.61 0.000 NB0290 85.97 NB0290 85.97 0.000 NB0300 85.97 NB0300 85.97 0.000 NB0310 85.96 NB0310 85.96 0.000 NB0320 86.02 NB0320 86.02 0.000 NB0330 86.02 NB0330 86.02 0.000 NB0340 87.51 NB0340 87.51 0.000 NB0350 87.55 NB0350 87.55 0.000 NB0360 87.77 NB0360 87.77 0.000 NB0370 88.27 NB0370 88.27 0.000 NB0380 88.29 NB0380 88.29 0.000 NB0390 90.41 NB0390 90.41 0.000 NB0400 91.23 NB0400 91.23 0.000 NB0410 93.90 NB0410 93.90 0.000 NB0420 95.68 NB0420 95.68 0.000 NB0430 95.71 NB0430 95.71 0.000 NB0440 23.20 NB0440 23.20 0.000 NB0450 23.18 NB0450 23.18 0.000 NB0460 23.18 NB0460 23.18 0.000 NB0470 23.14 NB0470 23.14 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NB0480 38.68 NB0480 38.68 0.000 NB0490 41.95 NB0490 41.95 0.000 NB0500 48.04 NB0500 48.04 0.000 NB0510 27.05 NB0510 27.05 0.000 NB0520 40.10 NB0520 40.10 0.000 NB0530 46.31 NB0530 46.31 0.000 NB0540 51.70 NB0540 51.70 0.000 NB0550 54.93 NB0550 54.93 0.000 NB0560 54.96 NB0560 54.96 0.000 NB0570 56.14 NB0570 56.14 0.000 NB0580 57.05 NB0580 57.05 0.000 NB0590 57.87 NB0590 57.87 0.000 NB0600 51.26 NB0600 51.26 0.000 NB0610 55.87 NB0610 55.87 0.000 NB0620 56.13 NB0620 56.13 0.000 NB0630 50.42 NB0630 50.42 0.000 NB0640 53.17 NB0640 53.17 0.000 NB0650 54.30 NB0650 54.30 0.000 NB0660 55.54 NB0660 55.54 0.000 NB0670 56.41 NB0670 56.41 0.000 NB0680 56.41 NB0680 56.41 0.000 NB0690 56.42 NB0690 56.42 0.000 NB0700 56.42 NB0700 56.42 0.000 NB0710 56.67 NB0710 56.67 0.000 NB0720 56.49 NB0720 56.49 0.000 NB0730 56.50 NB0730 56.50 0.000 NB0740 56.87 NB0740 56.87 0.000 NB0750 57.02 NB0750 57.02 0.000 NB0760 56.02 NB0760 56.02 0.000 NB0770 56.43 NB0770 56.43 0.000 NB0780 55.29 NB0780 55.29 0.000 NB0790 52.33 NB0790 52.33 0.000 NB0800 55.27 NB0800 55.27 0.000 NB0810 52.86 NB0810 52.86 0.000 NB0820 55.28 NB0820 55.28 0.000 NB0830 55.40 NB0830 55.40 0.000 NB0840 55.39 NB0840 55.39 0.000 NB0850 55.39 NB0850 55.39 0.000 NB0860 55.44 NB0860 55.44 0.000 NB0870 55.45 NB0870 55.45 0.000 NB0880 57.64 NB0880 57.64 0.000 NB0890 55.45 NB0890 55.45 0.000 NB0900 55.43 NB0900 55.43 0.000 NB0910 57.62 NB0910 57.62 0.000 NB0920 55.27 NB0920 55.27 0.000 NB0930 55.47 NB0930 55.47 0.000 NB0940 55.91 NB0940 55.91 0.000 NB0950 55.91 NB0950 55.91 0.000 NB0960 55.91 NB0960 55.91 0.000 NB0970 55.56 NB0970 55.56 0.000 NB0980 55.57 NB0980 55.57 0.000 NB0990 55.55 NB0990 55.55 0.000 NB1000 55.59 NB1000 55.59 0.000 NB1010 57.19 NB1010 57.19 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NB1020 59.86 NB1020 59.86 0.000 NB1030 64.67 NB1030 64.67 0.000 NB1040 71.00 NB1040 71.00 0.000 NB1050 77.76 NB1050 77.76 0.000 NB1060 80.84 NB1060 80.84 0.000 NB1070 55.57 NB1070 55.57 0.000 NB1080 55.58 NB1080 55.58 0.000 NB1090 55.58 NB1090 55.58 0.000 NB1100 56.31 NB1100 56.31 0.000 NB1110 56.49 NB1110 56.49 0.000 NB1120 56.58 NB1120 56.58 0.000 NB1130 60.78 NB1130 60.78 0.000 NB1140 56.88 NB1140 56.88 0.000 NB1150 56.57 NB1150 56.57 0.000 NB1160 56.95 NB1160 56.95 0.000 NB1170 57.92 NB1170 57.92 0.000 NB1180 56.43 NB1180 56.43 0.000 NB1190 69.17 NB1190 69.17 0.000 NB1200 71.98 NB1200 71.98 0.000 NB1210 75.23 NB1210 75.23 0.000 NB1220 56.45 NB1220 56.45 0.000 NB1230 63.92 NB1230 63.92 0.000 NB1240 66.56 NB1240 66.56 0.000 NB1250 74.08 NB1250 74.08 0.000 NB1255 73.17 NB1255 73.17 0.000 NB1260 73.71 NB1260 73.71 0.000 NB1270 74.82 NB1270 74.82 0.000 NB1280 75.79 NB1280 75.79 0.000 NB1290 60.08 NB1290 60.08 0.000 NB1300 61.18 NB1300 61.18 0.000 NB1310 59.53 NB1310 59.53 0.000 NB1320 59.67 NB1320 59.67 0.000 NB1330 76.70 NB1330 76.70 0.000 NB1340 61.28 NB1340 61.28 0.000 NB1350 72.47 NB1350 72.47 0.000 NB1360 83.76 NB1360 83.76 0.000 NB1370 84.51 NB1370 84.51 0.000 NB1380 86.96 NB1380 86.96 0.000 NB1390 86.98 NB1390 86.98 0.000 NB1400 87.00 NB1400 87.00 0.000 NB1410 87.01 NB1410 87.01 0.000 NB1420 87.07 NB1420 87.07 0.000 NB1430 89.85 NB1430 89.85 0.000 NB1440 75.35 NB1440 75.35 0.000 NB1450 78.82 NB1450 78.82 0.000 NB1460 81.47 NB1460 81.47 0.000 NB1470 82.07 NB1470 82.07 0.000 NB1480 85.98 NB1480 85.98 0.000 NB1490 85.97 NB1490 85.97 0.000 NB1500 85.98 NB1500 85.98 0.000 NB1510 87.14 NB1510 87.14 0.000 NB1520 87.17 NB1520 87.17 0.000 NB1530 87.16 NB1530 87.16 0.000 NB1540 86.85 NB1540 86.85 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NB1550 90.28 NB1550 90.28 0.000 NB1560 87.11 NB1560 87.11 0.000 NB1570 89.70 NB1570 89.70 0.000 NB1580 88.02 NB1580 88.02 0.000 NB1590 89.30 NB1590 89.30 0.000 NB1600 87.19 NB1600 87.19 0.000 NB1610 88.84 NB1610 88.84 0.000 NB1620 88.87 NB1620 88.87 0.000 NB1630 88.17 NB1630 88.17 0.000 NB1640 88.78 NB1640 88.78 0.000 NB1650 86.15 NB1650 86.15 0.000 NB1660 87.18 NB1660 87.18 0.000 NB1670 87.63 NB1670 87.63 0.000 NB1680 88.26 NB1680 88.26 0.000 NB1690 89.16 NB1690 89.16 0.000 NB1700 88.28 NB1700 88.28 0.000 NB1710 88.64 NB1710 88.64 0.000 NB1720 89.55 NB1720 89.55 0.000 NB1730 90.22 NB1730 90.22 0.000 NB1740 91.98 NB1740 91.98 0.000 NB1750 93.00 NB1750 93.00 0.000 NB1770 94.00 NB1770 94.00 0.000 NB1780 92.74 NB1780 92.74 0.000 NB1790 86.02 NB1790 86.02 0.000 NB1800 87.53 NB1800 87.53 0.000 NB1810 87.53 NB1810 87.53 0.000 NB1820 87.64 NB1820 87.64 0.000 NB1830 87.58 NB1830 87.58 0.000 NB1840 89.40 NB1840 89.40 0.000 NB1850 92.44 NB1850 92.44 0.000 NB1860 92.87 NB1860 92.87 0.000 NB1870 90.23 NB1870 90.23 0.000 NB1880 91.20 NB1880 91.20 0.000 NB1890 92.72 NB1890 92.72 0.000 NB1900 95.58 NB1900 95.58 0.000 NB1910 95.25 NB1910 95.25 0.000 NB1920 88.86 NB1920 88.86 0.000 NB1930 89.34 NB1930 89.34 0.000 NB1940 89.69 NB1940 89.69 0.000 NB1950 90.26 NB1950 90.26 0.000 NB1960 90.89 NB1960 90.89 0.000 NB1970 96.01 NB1970 96.01 0.000 NC0010 41.28 NC0010 41.28 0.000 NC0020 44.64 NC0020 44.64 0.000 NC0030 45.98 NC0030 45.98 0.000 NC0040 49.79 NC0040 49.79 0.000 NC0050 51.15 NC0050 51.15 0.000 NC0060 52.67 NC0060 52.67 0.000 NC0070 54.38 NC0070 54.38 0.000 NC0080 56.16 NC0080 56.16 0.000 NC0090 57.35 NC0090 57.35 0.000 NC0100 57.86 NC0100 57.86 0.000 NC0120 58.94 NC0120 58.94 0.000 NC0130 61.41 NC0130 61.41 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NC0140 63.30 NC0140 63.30 0.000 NC0150 63.48 NC0150 63.48 0.000 NC0160 64.03 NC0160 64.03 0.000 NC0170 66.06 NC0170 66.06 0.000 NC0180 66.45 NC0180 66.45 0.000 NC0190 66.61 NC0190 66.61 0.000 NC0200 67.16 NC0200 67.16 0.000 NC0210 71.50 NC0210 71.50 0.000 NC0220 72.41 NC0220 72.41 0.000 NC0230 78.34 NC0230 78.34 0.000 NC0240 79.84 NC0240 79.84 0.000 NC0250 80.26 NC0250 80.26 0.000 NC0260 52.75 NC0260 52.75 0.000 NC0270 53.40 NC0270 53.40 0.000 NC0280 57.35 NC0280 57.35 0.000 NC0290 57.37 NC0290 57.37 0.000 NC0300 57.71 NC0300 57.71 0.000 NC0310 57.84 NC0310 57.84 0.000 NC0320 57.14 NC0320 57.14 0.000 NC0330 61.40 NC0330 61.40 0.000 NC0340 62.08 NC0340 62.08 0.000 NC0350 62.47 NC0350 62.47 0.000 NC0360 63.64 NC0360 63.64 0.000 NC0370 65.06 NC0370 65.06 0.000 NC0380 67.71 NC0380 67.71 0.000 NC0390 71.16 NC0390 71.16 0.000 NC0400 71.54 NC0400 71.54 0.000 NC0410 62.95 NC0410 62.95 0.000 NC0420 63.18 NC0420 63.18 0.000 NC0430 64.00 NC0430 64.00 0.000 NC0440 65.00 NC0440 65.00 0.000 NC0450 62.77 NC0450 62.77 0.000 NC0460 63.96 NC0460 63.96 0.000 NC0470 66.44 NC0470 66.44 0.000 NC0480 66.17 NC0480 66.17 0.000 NC0490 83.43 NC0490 83.43 0.000 NC0500 86.75 NC0500 86.75 0.000 NC0510 86.78 NC0510 86.78 0.000 NC0520 87.19 NC0520 87.19 0.000 ND0010 44.32 ND0010 44.32 0.000 ND0020 46.18 ND0020 46.18 0.000 ND0030 49.44 ND0030 49.44 0.000 ND0040 50.28 ND0040 50.28 0.000 ND0050 50.54 ND0050 50.54 0.000 ND0070 51.23 ND0070 51.23 0.000 ND0080 51.28 ND0080 51.28 0.000 ND0090 51.57 ND0090 51.57 0.000 ND0100 51.62 ND0100 51.62 0.000 ND0110 52.57 ND0110 52.57 0.000 ND0120 53.45 ND0120 53.45 0.000 ND0130 54.08 ND0130 54.08 0.000 ND0140 54.30 ND0140 54.30 0.000 ND0150 55.51 ND0150 55.51 0.000 ND0155 57.69 ND0155 57.69 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE ND0160 60.42 ND0160 60.42 0.000 ND0170 63.85 ND0170 63.85 0.000 ND0180 73.79 ND0180 73.79 0.000 ND0190 77.02 ND0190 77.02 0.000 ND0200 48.32 ND0200 48.32 0.000 ND0210 50.46 ND0210 50.46 0.000 ND0220 50.66 ND0220 50.66 0.000 ND0230 51.69 ND0230 51.69 0.000 ND0240 51.69 ND0240 51.69 0.000 ND0250 52.80 ND0250 52.80 0.000 ND0260 53.17 ND0260 53.17 0.000 ND0270 51.68 ND0270 51.68 0.000 ND0280 52.15 ND0280 52.15 0.000 ND0290 50.54 ND0290 50.54 0.000 ND0300 50.58 ND0300 50.58 0.000 ND0310 51.17 ND0310 51.17 0.000 ND0320 53.14 ND0320 53.14 0.000 ND0330 53.17 ND0330 53.17 0.000 ND0340 53.75 ND0340 53.75 0.000 ND0350 51.03 ND0350 51.03 0.000 ND0360 51.73 ND0360 51.73 0.000 ND0370 51.76 ND0370 51.76 0.000 ND0380 51.23 ND0380 51.23 0.000 ND0390 51.25 ND0390 51.25 0.000 ND0400 51.30 ND0400 51.30 0.000 ND0410 51.31 ND0410 51.31 0.000 ND0420 53.83 ND0420 53.83 0.000 ND0430 51.27 ND0430 51.27 0.000 ND0440 51.25 ND0440 51.25 0.000 ND0450 51.27 ND0450 51.27 0.000 ND0460 51.29 ND0460 51.29 0.000 ND0470 51.38 ND0470 51.38 0.000 ND0480 51.62 ND0480 51.62 0.000 ND0490 51.28 ND0490 51.28 0.000 ND0500 54.40 ND0500 54.40 0.000 ND0502 52.64 ND0502 52.64 0.000 ND0505 53.98 ND0505 53.98 0.000 ND0507 56.05 ND0507 56.05 0.000 ND0510 55.69 ND0510 55.69 0.000 ND0520 57.77 ND0520 57.77 0.000 ND0530 58.43 ND0530 58.43 0.000 ND0540 60.03 ND0540 60.03 0.000 ND0550 60.07 ND0550 60.07 0.000 ND0560 60.56 ND0560 60.56 0.000 ND0570 61.32 ND0570 61.32 0.000 ND0580 55.51 ND0580 55.51 0.000 ND0590 56.57 ND0590 56.57 0.000 ND0600 59.81 ND0600 59.81 0.000 ND0610 60.86 ND0610 60.86 0.000 ND0620 55.51 ND0620 55.51 0.000 ND0630 58.84 ND0630 58.84 0.000 ND0640 61.36 ND0640 61.36 0.000 ND0645 63.06 ND0645 63.06 0.000 ND0647 62.61 ND0647 62.61 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE ND0650 63.39 ND0650 63.39 0.000 ND0660 58.84 ND0660 58.84 0.000 ND0670 61.37 ND0670 61.37 0.000 ND0680 60.78 ND0680 60.78 0.000 ND0690 62.41 ND0690 62.41 0.000 ND0700 64.84 ND0700 64.84 0.000 ND0710 62.68 ND0710 62.68 0.000 ND0720 60.42 ND0720 60.42 0.000 ND0730 60.47 ND0730 60.47 0.000 ND0740 61.81 ND0740 61.81 0.000 ND0750 60.60 ND0750 60.60 0.000 ND0760 63.52 ND0760 63.52 0.000 ND0770 64.27 ND0770 64.27 0.000 ND0780 72.06 ND0780 72.06 0.000 ND0790 69.18 ND0790 69.18 0.000 ND0800 65.04 ND0800 65.04 0.000 ND0810 66.38 ND0810 66.38 0.000 NE0010 8.31 NE0010 8.31 0.000 NE0020 12.61 NE0020 12.61 0.000 NE0030 18.01 NE0030 18.01 0.000 NE0040 18.02 NE0040 18.02 0.000 NE0050 18.03 NE0050 18.03 0.000 NE0060 18.04 NE0060 18.04 0.000 NE0070 18.27 NE0070 18.27 0.000 NE0080 18.37 NE0080 18.37 0.000 NE0090 18.77 NE0090 18.77 0.000 NE0100 19.18 NE0100 19.18 0.000 NE0110 19.28 NE0110 19.28 0.000 NE0120 19.41 NE0120 19.41 0.000 NE0130 20.74 NE0130 20.74 0.000 NE0140 22.34 NE0140 22.34 0.000 NE0150 22.47 NE0150 22.47 0.000 NE0160 22.78 NE0160 22.78 0.000 NE0170 23.23 NE0170 23.23 0.000 NE0180 23.87 NE0180 23.87 0.000 NE0190 25.16 NE0190 25.16 0.000 NE0200 25.65 NE0200 25.65 0.000 NE0210 30.39 NE0210 30.39 0.000 NE0220 32.92 NE0220 32.92 0.000 NE0230 34.29 NE0230 34.29 0.000 NE0240 34.99 NE0240 34.99 0.000 NE0250 38.16 NE0250 38.16 0.000 NE0260 38.66 NE0260 38.66 0.000 NE0270 39.98 NE0270 39.98 0.000 NE0280 43.11 NE0280 43.11 0.000 NE0290 43.80 NE0290 43.80 0.000 NE0300 48.91 NE0300 48.91 0.000 NE0310 12.61 NE0310 12.61 0.000 NE0320 18.02 NE0320 18.02 0.000 NE0330 18.37 NE0330 18.37 0.000 NE0340 24.71 NE0340 24.71 0.000 NE0345 18.76 NE0345 18.76 0.000 NE0350 18.76 NE0350 18.76 0.000 NE0360 20.58 NE0360 20.58 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NE0370 22.86 NE0370 22.86 0.000 NE0380 24.94 NE0380 24.94 0.000 NE0390 18.05 NE0390 18.05 0.000 NE0400 18.08 NE0400 18.08 0.000 NE0410 18.06 NE0410 18.06 0.000 NE0420 18.05 NE0420 18.05 0.000 NE0430 18.14 NE0430 18.14 0.000 NE0440 18.88 NE0440 18.88 0.000 NE0450 18.98 NE0450 18.98 0.000 NE0460 18.07 NE0460 18.07 0.000 NE0470 19.47 NE0470 19.47 0.000 NE0480 20.01 NE0480 20.01 0.000 NE0490 18.34 NE0490 18.34 0.000 NE0500 19.06 NE0500 19.06 0.000 NE0510 19.18 NE0510 19.18 0.000 NE0520 19.59 NE0520 19.59 0.000 NE0530 22.60 NE0530 22.60 0.000 NE0540 24.73 NE0540 24.73 0.000 NE0550 27.96 NE0550 27.96 0.000 NE0560 39.27 NE0560 39.27 0.000 NE0570 44.58 NE0570 44.58 0.000 NE0580 44.89 NE0580 44.89 0.000 NE0590 48.66 NE0590 48.66 0.000 NE0600 52.30 NE0600 52.30 0.000 NE0610 52.07 NE0610 52.07 0.000 NE0620 22.61 NE0620 22.61 0.000 NE0630 22.61 NE0630 22.61 0.000 NE0640 22.61 NE0640 22.61 0.000 NE0650 23.01 NE0650 23.01 0.000 NE0660 22.60 NE0660 22.60 0.000 NE0670 27.37 NE0670 27.37 0.000 NE0680 53.19 NE0680 53.19 0.000 NE0690 20.03 NE0690 20.03 0.000 NE0700 23.59 NE0700 23.59 0.000 NE0710 20.02 NE0710 20.02 0.000 NE0720 28.48 NE0720 28.48 0.000 NE0730 33.57 NE0730 33.57 0.000 NE0740 23.75 NE0740 23.75 0.000 NE0750 21.62 NE0750 21.62 0.000 NE0760 21.74 NE0760 21.74 0.000 NE0770 22.75 NE0770 22.75 0.000 NE0780 22.77 NE0780 22.77 0.000 NE0790 22.65 NE0790 22.65 0.000 NE0800 22.47 NE0800 22.47 0.000 NE0810 22.42 NE0810 22.42 0.000 NE0820 22.48 NE0820 22.48 0.000 NE0830 22.80 NE0830 22.80 0.000 NE0840 30.78 NE0840 30.78 0.000 NE0850 37.20 NE0850 37.20 0.000 NE0860 48.57 NE0860 48.57 0.000 NE0870 22.79 NE0870 22.79 0.000 NE0880 40.80 NE0880 40.80 0.000 NE0890 24.12 NE0890 24.12 0.000 NE0900 25.53 NE0900 25.53 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NE0910 26.71 NE0910 26.71 0.000 NE0920 29.23 NE0920 29.23 0.000 NE0930 32.31 NE0930 32.31 0.000 NE0940 49.15 NE0940 49.15 0.000 NE0950 53.69 NE0950 53.69 0.000 NE0960 55.15 NE0960 55.15 0.000 NE0970 57.42 NE0970 57.42 0.000 NE0980 29.49 NE0980 29.49 0.000 NE0990 50.68 NE0990 50.68 0.000 NE1000 51.61 NE1000 51.61 0.000 NE1010 23.14 NE1010 23.14 0.000 NE1020 24.50 NE1020 24.50 0.000 NE1030 25.53 NE1030 25.53 0.000 NE1040 26.79 NE1040 26.79 0.000 NE1050 23.97 NE1050 23.97 0.000 NE1060 24.98 NE1060 24.98 0.000 NE1070 25.01 NE1070 25.01 0.000 NE1080 26.84 NE1080 26.84 0.000 NE1090 33.77 NE1090 33.77 0.000 NE1100 35.41 NE1100 35.41 0.000 NE1110 39.84 NE1110 39.84 0.000 NE1120 44.09 NE1120 44.09 0.000 NE1130 47.39 NE1130 47.39 0.000 NF0010 37.57 NF0010 37.57 0.000 NF0020 38.62 NF0020 38.61 -0.010 NF0030 44.20 NF0030 44.20 0.000 NF0040 48.29 NF0040 48.29 0.000 NF0050 49.79 NF0050 49.79 0.000 NF0060 53.36 NF0060 53.36 0.000 NF0070 53.51 NF0070 53.51 0.000 NF0080 53.94 NF0080 53.94 0.000 NF0090 54.46 NF0090 54.46 0.000 NF0100 54.63 NF0100 54.63 0.000 NF0110 54.79 NF0110 54.79 0.000 NF0120 57.35 NF0120 57.35 0.000 NF0130 68.20 NF0130 68.20 0.000 NF0140 72.43 NF0140 72.43 0.000 NF0150 75.40 NF0150 75.40 0.000 NF0160 76.98 NF0160 76.98 0.000 NF0170 77.99 NF0170 77.99 0.000 NF0180 80.34 NF0180 80.34 0.000 NF0190 81.91 NF0190 81.91 0.000 NF0200 86.59 NF0200 86.59 0.000 NF0210 87.28 NF0210 87.28 0.000 NF0220 89.36 NF0220 89.36 0.000 NF0230 40.79 NF0230 40.79 0.000 NF0240 39.43 NF0240 39.43 0.000 NF0250 44.96 NF0250 44.96 0.000 NF0260 53.76 NF0260 53.76 0.000 NF0270 55.52 NF0270 55.52 0.000 NF0280 54.64 NF0280 54.64 0.000 NF0290 56.90 NF0290 56.90 0.000 NF0300 63.81 NF0300 63.81 0.000 NF0310 73.12 NF0310 73.12 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NF0320 75.22 NF0320 75.22 0.000 NF0330 75.74 NF0330 75.74 0.000 NF0340 77.74 NF0340 77.74 0.000 NF0350 80.11 NF0350 80.11 0.000 NF0360 81.36 NF0360 81.36 0.000 NF0370 84.52 NF0370 84.52 0.000 NF0380 89.22 NF0380 89.22 0.000 NF0390 80.33 NF0390 80.33 0.000 NF0400 82.13 NF0400 82.13 0.000 NF0410 86.58 NF0410 86.58 0.000 NF0420 85.73 NF0420 85.73 0.000 NF0430 88.55 NF0430 88.55 0.000 NG0020 21.28 NG0020 21.28 0.000 NG0030 21.27 NG0030 21.27 0.000 NG0040 22.57 NG0040 22.57 0.000 NG0050 25.22 NG0050 25.22 0.000 NG0060 26.32 NG0060 26.32 0.000 NG0070 26.54 NG0070 26.54 0.000 NG0080 35.07 NG0080 35.07 0.000 NG0090 41.44 NG0090 41.44 0.000 NG0100 42.11 NG0100 42.11 0.000 NG0110 21.72 NG0110 21.72 0.000 NG0120 21.74 NG0120 21.74 0.000 NG0130 21.45 NG0130 21.44 -0.010 NG0140 21.22 NG0140 21.21 -0.010 NG0150 21.21 NG0150 21.21 0.000 NG0160 21.21 NG0160 21.21 0.000 NG0170 39.07 NG0170 39.07 0.000 NG0180 21.99 NG0180 21.99 0.000 NG0190 22.18 NG0190 22.18 0.000 NG0200 22.24 NG0200 22.24 0.000 NG0205 23.29 NG0205 23.29 0.000 NG0210 23.79 NG0210 23.79 0.000 NG0220 24.80 NG0220 24.80 0.000 NG0230 26.69 NG0230 26.69 0.000 NG0240 31.78 NG0240 31.78 0.000 NG0250 33.52 NG0250 33.52 0.000 NG0260 42.34 NG0260 42.34 0.000 NG0270 48.57 NG0270 48.57 0.000 NG0280 50.00 NG0280 50.00 0.000 NG0290 51.94 NG0290 51.94 0.000 NG0300 23.13 NG0300 23.13 0.000 NG0310 22.29 NG0310 22.29 0.000 NG0320 22.00 NG0320 21.99 -0.010 NG0330 21.99 NG0330 21.99 0.000 NG0340 22.00 NG0340 21.99 -0.010 NG0350 17.39 NG0350 17.39 0.000 NG0360 17.39 NG0360 17.39 0.000 NG0370 27.39 NG0370 27.39 0.000 NG0380 29.95 NG0380 29.95 0.000 NG0390 35.65 NG0390 35.65 0.000 NG0400 37.40 NG0400 37.40 0.000 NG0420 41.46 NG0420 41.46 0.000 NG0430 41.78 NG0430 41.78 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NG0440 37.52 NG0440 37.52 0.000 NG0450 37.95 NG0450 37.95 0.000 NG0460 42.03 NG0460 42.03 0.000 NG0470 26.51 NG0470 26.51 0.000 NG0480 40.33 NG0480 40.33 0.000 NH0010 25.25 NH0010 25.24 -0.010 NH0020 25.17 NH0020 25.17 0.000 NH0030 25.20 NH0030 25.20 0.000 NH0040 25.61 NH0040 25.61 0.000 NH0050 26.81 NH0050 26.81 0.000 NH0060 26.99 NH0060 26.99 0.000 NH0070 27.12 NH0070 27.12 0.000 NH0080 27.48 NH0080 27.48 0.000 NH0090 28.66 NH0090 28.66 0.000 NH0100 33.11 NH0100 33.11 0.000 NH0110 33.29 NH0110 33.29 0.000 NH0120 33.45 NH0120 33.45 0.000 NH0130 40.07 NH0130 40.07 0.000 NH0140 42.38 NH0140 42.38 0.000 NH0150 46.16 NH0150 46.16 0.000 NH0160 53.88 NH0160 53.88 0.000 NH0170 55.93 NH0170 55.93 0.000 NH0180 59.37 NH0180 59.37 0.000 NH0190 59.53 NH0190 59.53 0.000 NH0200 59.98 NH0200 59.98 0.000 NH0210 59.05 NH0210 59.05 0.000 NH0220 59.42 NH0220 59.42 0.000 NH0230 26.88 NH0230 26.88 0.000 NH0240 26.98 NH0240 26.98 0.000 NH0250 27.00 NH0250 27.00 0.000 NH0260 28.32 NH0260 28.32 0.000 NH0270 30.68 NH0270 30.68 0.000 NH0280 31.97 NH0280 31.97 0.000 NH0290 27.81 NH0290 27.81 0.000 NH0300 33.39 NH0300 33.39 0.000 NH0310 32.38 NH0310 32.38 0.000 NH0320 27.15 NH0320 27.15 0.000 NH0330 28.84 NH0330 28.84 0.000 NH0340 31.28 NH0340 31.28 0.000 NH0350 28.94 NH0350 28.94 0.000 NH0360 49.93 NH0360 49.93 0.000 NH0370 50.46 NH0370 50.46 0.000 NH0380 56.81 NH0380 56.81 0.000 NH0390 53.52 NH0390 53.52 0.000 NH0400 71.70 NH0400 71.70 0.000 NH0410 72.52 NH0410 72.52 0.000 NH0420 71.85 NH0420 71.85 0.000 NH0430 33.97 NH0430 33.97 0.000 NH0440 35.07 NH0440 35.07 0.000 NH0450 33.84 NH0450 33.84 0.000 NH0460 44.82 NH0460 44.82 0.000 NH0470 38.95 NH0470 38.95 0.000 NH0480 42.12 NH0480 42.12 0.000 NH0490 49.59 NH0490 49.59 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NH0500 57.57 NH0500 57.58 0.010 NH0510 60.11 NH0510 60.11 0.000 NH0520 62.40 NH0520 62.40 0.000 NH0530 65.36 NH0530 65.36 0.000 NH0540 66.90 NH0540 66.90 0.000 NH0550 68.12 NH0550 68.12 0.000 NH0560 68.72 NH0560 68.72 0.000 NH0570 70.04 NH0570 70.04 0.000 NH0580 72.86 NH0580 72.86 0.000 NH0590 73.25 NH0590 73.25 0.000 NH0600 73.53 NH0600 73.53 0.000 NH0610 73.91 NH0610 73.91 0.000 NH0620 73.81 NH0620 73.81 0.000 NH0630 73.65 NH0630 73.65 0.000 NH0640 70.66 NH0640 70.66 0.000 NH0650 72.06 NH0650 72.06 0.000 NH0660 71.53 NH0660 71.53 0.000 NH0670 71.41 NH0670 71.41 0.000 NH0680 71.81 NH0680 71.81 0.000 NH0690 72.22 NH0690 72.22 0.000 NH0700 70.36 NH0700 70.36 0.000 NH0710 73.02 NH0710 73.02 0.000 NH0720 73.44 NH0720 73.44 0.000 NH0730 73.60 NH0730 73.60 0.000 NH0740 70.80 NH0740 70.80 0.000 NH0750 72.05 NH0750 72.05 0.000 NH0760 73.02 NH0760 73.02 0.000 NH0770 73.04 NH0770 73.04 0.000 NH0780 73.06 NH0780 73.06 0.000 NH0790 73.19 NH0790 73.19 0.000 NH0800 73.17 NH0800 73.17 0.000 NH0810 73.08 NH0810 73.08 0.000 NH0820 73.12 NH0820 73.12 0.000 NH0830 72.75 NH0830 72.75 0.000 NH0840 73.42 NH0840 73.42 0.000 NH0850 74.29 NH0850 74.29 0.000 NH0860 73.30 NH0860 73.30 0.000 NH0870 73.20 NH0870 73.20 0.000 NH0880 73.18 NH0880 73.18 0.000 NH0890 73.65 NH0890 73.65 0.000 NH0900 74.74 NH0900 74.74 0.000 NH0910 73.56 NH0910 73.56 0.000 NH0920 43.13 NH0920 43.13 0.000 NH0930 47.86 NH0930 47.86 0.000 NH0940 44.12 NH0940 44.12 0.000 NH0950 63.26 NH0950 63.26 0.000 NH0960 72.60 NH0960 72.60 0.000 NH0970 30.61 NH0970 30.61 0.000 NJ0010 25.13 NJ0010 25.12 -0.010 NJ0020 25.20 NJ0020 25.20 0.000 NJ0030 25.17 NJ0030 25.17 0.000 NJ0040 26.54 NJ0040 26.54 0.000 NJ0050 37.91 NJ0050 37.91 0.000 NJ0060 49.64 NJ0060 49.64 0.000 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Comp. By:TER Suite 200 Chk. By:TER 2601 Cattlement Road Date:03/12/14 Sarasota, Florida 34232 Job No.:148128033 (941) 379-7600 Revised: PROJECT: NODE STAGE NODE STAGE DIFFERENCE (FT)COMMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS CENTRAL WAREHOUSE NJ0070 52.78 NJ0070 52.78 0.000 NJ0080 54.23 NJ0080 54.23 0.000 NJ0090 54.61 NJ0090 54.61 0.000 NJ0100 54.66 NJ0100 54.66 0.000 NJ0110 54.69 NJ0110 54.69 0.000 NJ0120 57.89 NJ0120 57.89 0.000 NJ0130 58.20 NJ0130 58.20 0.000 NJ0140 62.67 NJ0140 62.67 0.000 NJ0150 25.17 NJ0150 25.17 0.000 NJ0160 30.96 NJ0160 30.96 0.000 NJ0170 48.60 NJ0170 48.60 0.000 NJ0180 52.23 NJ0180 52.23 0.000 NJ0190 25.17 NJ0190 25.17 0.000 NJ0200 54.60 NJ0200 54.60 0.000 NJ0210 55.19 NJ0210 55.19 0.000 NJ0220 55.86 NJ0220 55.86 0.000 NJ0225 56.10 NJ0225 56.10 0.000 NJ0230 57.12 NJ0230 57.12 0.000 NJ0240 56.11 NJ0240 56.11 0.000 NJ0250 56.15 NJ0250 56.15 0.000 NJ0260 57.43 NJ0260 57.43 0.000 NJ0270 54.64 NJ0270 54.64 0.000 EXHIBIT 1 PROPERTY DEED EXHIBIT 2 SWFWMD PRE-APPLICATION MEETING THIS FORM IS INTENDED TO FACILITATE AND GUIDE THE DIALOGUE DURING A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING BY PROVIDING A PARTIAL "PROMPT LIST" OF DISCUSSION SUBJECTS. IT IS NOT A LIST OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE APPLICANT. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RESOURCE REGULATION DIVISION PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES FILE NUMBER: PA 400907 Date: Time: Project Name: Attendees: February 20, 2014 1500pm Church of Scientology Central Warehouse Steven Sonberg steven.sonberg@kimley-horn.com Tim Roane, P.E. tim.roane@kimley-horn.com Steven Lopes, P.E. County: Total Land Acreage: Pinellas County Sec/Twp/Rge: Project Acreage: 01/29/2015 3.26 acres Prior On-Site/Off-Site Permit Activity: • No prior permits Project Overview: • Proposed 88,747 SF warehouse and site improvements. Site Information Discussion: (SHW Levels, Floodplain, Tailwater Conditions, Adjacent Off-Site Contributing Sources, Receiving Waterbody, etc.) • Existing irrigation well onsite. Please contact District Water Use Staff if well anticipated to be capped/abandoned. • Existing ditch (and drainage easement) along south property line. • FEMA flood zones X500 and AE. Best available floodplain information is Alligator Creek Watershed Model which indicates onsite floodplain. • Address by demonstrating no adverse offsite flooding impacts using the watershed model, or by cup-for-cup type compensation. • Lidar available. Water Quantity Discussions: (Basin Description, Storm Event, Pre/Post Volume, Pre/Post Discharge, etc.) • Demonstrate that discharges from proposed project area will not cause an adverse impact for a 25-year, 24- hour storm event. • Demonstrate that site will not impede the conveyance of contributing off-site flows. • Demonstrate that the project will not increase flood stages up- or down-stream of the project area(s). Water Quality Discussions: (Type of Treatment, Technical Characteristics, Non-presumptive Alternatives, etc.) • Provide water quality treatment for entire project area and all contributing off-site flows. • Project discharges to an impaired water body, must demonstrate provide a net environmental improvement. WBID 1574 impaired for D.O., fecal coliform, and nutrients. Land use is not changing, only impervious coverage. Applicant must demonstrate a net improvement for the parameters of concern by performing a pre/post pollutant loading analysis based on existing land use and the proposed land use. Operation and Maintenance/Legal Information: (Ownership or Perpetual Control, O&M Entity, O&M Instructions, Homeowner Association Documents, Coastal Zone requirements, etc.) • Provide proof of ownership in the form of a deed, lease, or contract for sale. • Provide appropriate O&M instructions. • Provide detailed soil erosion & sediment control plan. Application Type and Fee Required: • SW ERP – Sections A, C and E of the ERP Application. • < 10 acres of project area and no wetland or surface water impacts - $273.00 Online Submittal. Disclaimer: The District ERP pre-application meeting process is a service made available to the public to assist interested parties in preparing for submittal of a permit application. Information shared at pre-application meetings is superseded by the actual permit application submittal. District permit decisions are based upon information submitted during the application process and Rules in effect at the time the application is complete. EXHIBIT 3 UNIVERSAL, SOILS REPORT EXHIBIT 4 FEMA FIRMETTE FLOODPLAIN MAP EXHIBIT 5 MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS GUIDELINES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR CENTRAL WAREHOUSE Prepared For: CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION 503 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Prepared By: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 2601 Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 Sarasota, Florida 34232 March 2014 Project No: 148128033 I.SWALE MAINTENANCE A.Maintenance of Grassed Areas Once sodded and established, all grassed areas shall be mowed regularly and maintained free from bare earth conditions to prevent the potential for erosion. Grass clippings shall be collected and disposed properly. Clippings shall not be disposed in lakes or preserve areas. II.OPERATION INSPECTIONS Operation inspections shall be conducted annually to assure that the stormwater management system functions as designed. Spot inspections during rainstorm events may also be periodically warranted. The following features of the stormwater management system should be inspected during each visitation. An inspection report form is provided in the back of this manual. A.Vegetation The need for vegetation removal or spraying should be determined. Grassed areas such as lawn areas, swales and pond bottom should also be inspected to determine the need for mowing, reseeding or fertilization. B.Discharge Structures System discharge control structures should be inspected ensuring no obstructions to flow (i.e., debris) exist that would reduce the release rate of the system. The structural condition of the control boxes or weirs should also be inspected for evidence of seepage, settlement, or concrete deterioration. Sediment deposits located in the vicinity of control structures as well as scouring conditions at discharge locations should be routinely noted. C.Swale Detention Areas Swale detention areas designed to temporarily detain stormwater during a rainfall event should be inspected to assure that they are kept mowed and free from stagnant water conditions. D.Conveyance System The conveyance system which includes storm sewer piping, inlets, and junction boxes should be inspected for structural and functional integrity. Evidence of seepage, restricted flow, or turbid discharges should be noted. Structures with sediment sumps should be cleaned annually with proper disposal of collected sediments. E.Fill Areas Areas which have been filled and stabilized adjacent to any portion of stormwater management system should be inspected for evidence of settlement, erosion or slope failure. CHECK LIST OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSPECTION RECORD STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Name of Project:_________________________________________________________________ Project Location:_________________________________________________________________ Type of Inspection:_________________________________________________________________ Date of Inspection:_________________________________________________________________ Anticipated Operation:Satisfactory _______________ Unsatisfactory _____________ ITEM CONDITION ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE RECOMMENDED MAINTENANCE (If Required) 1. Vegetation/Grassed Area 2. Discharge Structures 3. Grassed Swale Detention 4. Conveyance System 5. Fill Areas REMARKS: ____________________________________________ Signature of Inspector ____________________________________________ Name of Organization Being Represented K:\SAR_URG\148128033 - COS Central Warehouse\KHA_ADMIN\Reports\Drainage Report - SWFWMD\SWFWMD \SWMM.doc EXHIBIT 6 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES GUIDELINES BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES GUIDELINES MANUAL FOR CENTRAL WAREHOUSE Prepared For: CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION 503 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Prepared By: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 2601 Cattlemen Road, Suite 200 Sarasota, Florida 34232 March 2013 Project No: 148128033 1 FORWARD This manual has been prepared for Central Warehouse project to address the rules of the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. The manual is divided into six (6) sections addressing the following areas: 1.Protection of preserved/conserved wetland habitats during construction. 2.Protection of preserved/conserved upland habitats during construction. 3.General erosion control. 4.Protection of surface water quality during and after construction. 5.Control of wind erosion. 6.Turbidity monitoring. The various techniques or actions identified are cross-referenced to specific BMP figures on EXHIBIT A. A plan sheet showing the figures shall be incorporated into each set of site construction plans for Central Warehouse project with clear indication of which BMP's are applicable to the specific project. 2 BMP's BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Central Warehouse Project SECTION 1 PROTECTION OF PRESERVED/CONSERVED WETLAND HABITATS DURING CONSTRUCTION 1.1 Wetland habitat protection BMP's shall be utilized for any development parcel which contains or abuts a preserved wet prairie, swamp, head, or other wetland habitat. 1.2 Preserved wetland habitat shall be protected prior to the start of adjacent site work construction. Protection shall consist of a silt barrier erected along the entire perimeter of the preserved wetland. The silt barrier shall be constructed along the outer edge of the buffer adjoining the preserved wetland. The silt barrier may be either a silt fence as shown in FIGURE 2 or hay bales as shown in FIGURE 3. 1.3 Silt barriers used for wetland protection shall remain in place for the duration of any site work within the drainage basin, or building construction located adjacent to the wetland. SECTION 2 PROTECTION OF PRESERVED/CONSERVED UPLAND HABITATS 2.1 Barricades shall be placed around all protected (preserved) habitats including wetland-fringing hammocks and uplands during construction. SECTION 3 GENERAL EROSION CONTROL 3.1 General erosion control BMP's shall be employed to minimize soil erosion and potential lake slope cave-ins. While the various techniques required will be site and plan specific, they should be employed as soon as possible during construction activities. 3.2 Cleared site development areas not continually scheduled for construction activities shall be covered with hay or overseeded and periodically watered sufficient to stabilize the temporary ground cover. 3.3 Slopes of banks of lakes shall be constructed not steeper than 4H:1V from top of bank to two feet below normal water level as shown in FIGURE 6 or as indicated on the construction plans. 3.4 All grass slopes constructed steeper than 6H:1V shall be sodded as soon as practical after their construction as shown in FIGURE 13. 3.5 Sod shall be placed for a 2-foot wide strip adjoining all curbing and around all inlets as shown in FIGURE 14. Sod shall be placed before silt barriers, shown in FIGURE 7, are removed. 3 3.6 Where required to prevent erosion from sheet flow across bare ground from entering a lake or swale, a temporary sediment sump shall be constructed, as shown in FIGURE 15. The temporary sediment sump shall remain in place until vegetation is established on the ground draining to the sump. 3.7 If dewatering during construction results in any temporary standing water body of more than 72 hours duration, the Contractor shall notify the Mosquito Control District by phone (941) 861- 9740. SECTION 4 PROTECTION OF SURFACE WATER QUALITY DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION 4.1 Surface water quality shall be maintained by employing the following BMP's in the design and construction of all improvements. 4.2 Where practical, stormwater shall be conveyed by swales. Swales shall be constructed as shown in FIGURE 3. 4.3 Erosion control measures shall be employed to minimize turbidity of surface waters located downstream of any construction activity. While the various measures required will be site specific, they shall be employed as needed in accordance with the following: a.In general, erosion shall be controlled at the furthest practical upstream location. b.Stormwater inlets shall be protected during construction as shown in FIGURES 7 and 8. Protection measures shall be employed as soon as practical during the various stages of inlet construction. Silt barriers shall remain in place until sodding around inlets is complete. c.Stormwater piping connecting to existing lakes shall be constructed in accordance with the protective measures shown in FIGURE 9. The silt fence shall be installed prior to laying storm pipe and shall remain in place until disturbed areas of the lake bank are sodded. d.Stormwater piping connecting to existing ditches shall be constructed in accordance with the protective measures shown in FIGURE 10. The silt barrier shall be installed prior to laying storm pipe and shall remain in place until disturbed areas of the lake bank are sodded. e.Swales or ditches connecting to existing ditches shall be constructed in accordance with the protective measures shown in FIGURE 11. The silt barrier shall be installed prior to excavating the proposed ditch or swale and shall remain in place until the proposed ditch or swale is sodded. f.Underground pipe crossings of ditches shall require the use of the protective measures shown in FIGURE 12. Silt fences shall be installed prior to construction of temporary 4 earth berms and shall remain in place until temporary berms are removed and until disturbed areas of ditch bank are sodded. 4.4 Heavy construction equipment parking and maintenance areas shall be designed to prevent oil, grease, and lubricants from entering site drainage features including stormwater collection and treatment systems. Contractors shall provide broad dikes, hay bales or silt screens around, and sediment sumps within, such areas as required to contain spills of oil, grease or lubricants. Contractors shall have available, and shall use, absorbent filter pads to clean up spills as soon as possible after occurrence. SECTION 5 CONTROL OF WIND EROSION 5.1 Employing the following methods as necessary and appropriate shall control wind erosion: a.Bare earth areas shall be watered during construction as necessary to minimize the transport of fugitive dust. It may be necessary to limit construction vehicle speed if bare earth has not been effectively watered. b.After completion of construction, bare earth areas shall be grassed or landscaped, as soon as practical. c.At any time that watering and/or vegetation are not effective in controlling wind erosion and/or transport of fugitive dust, other methods as are necessary for such control shall be employed. If required, dust control fences shall be constructed in accordance with the detail for a silt fence shown in Figure 2 except the minimum height shall be 4 feet. SECTION 6 PROCEDURE FOR TURBIDITY MONITORING 6.1 Turbidity is a quick and efficient method for measuring the relative amount of interference of light on the water column of any aquatic system due to particles held in suspension. Thus, measurements of turbidity can indicate relative levels of material introduced into an aquatic system through anthropogenic and/or natural processes. 6.2 During periods of normal flows, monitoring of turbidity levels shall be performed as follows: a.All measurements of turbidity shall be performed as deemed necessary by the Environmental Consultant, at the locations specified on the Best Management Practices Plan. i.Monitoring shall always start at stations upstream of any construction. ii.All monitoring at stations downstream of construction shall be done last. b.Measurements of turbidity shall not be necessary for the following: 5 i.High density vegetation areas where development is occurring >500 ft. from a natural body of water. ii.All other areas where development is occurring at >1000 ft. from a natural body of water. c.A visual check of the entire area shall be performed daily. i.Any suspicious observations made shall be immediately checked by turbidimeter at both upstream and downstream locations as described in Section 6.2. d.Any station where turbidity levels are out of compliance with County and Florida Water Management Districts standards shall be reported immediately by telephone to the County Pollution Control Division and the corresponding Florida Water Management District and development shall be suspended until turbidity levels reach County and Florida Water Management District standards. 6.3 Monitoring during periods of rainfall shall be performed more frequently. a.Only total accumulations of rainfall >0.5" over a two-hour period shall be monitored three times per day until turbidity levels go back to background (i.e., prior to the rain event). As soon as turbidity levels are in violation of County and Florida Water Management District standards, development shall cease. Monitoring of turbidity shall be performed at all development sites regardless of a 500-1000 buffer zone. b.After the rain event, once turbidity levels are in compliance with County or Florida Water Management District standards, daily monitoring can resume (as outlined in 6.2). c.Rain events with accumulations <-0.5" over a two-hour period will be monitored as described in 6.2. 6.4 Dried-up streambeds shall not be monitored until water levels rise sufficiently to warrant any turbidity measurements. 6 «; : �r; �:C \ : �t^ , � i� -�r �... r {! ei AB., t.'� 5 � •:� � 1 , . ; �t qp ��s�Y• - ��\ ' ¢� "�*� ,, . t' , c , r ,� �.<, '�� �... F...n r+'� (� - t i ` �I���I�1�� cM1Z,.. -.' �=''a � � �r ..� -..^ ''m` "�" ■ � ►' D��' i ::�� � '�/ ► .y '�, � ,a+� j d qj\ 4 �4 - , j� �/ �►` ,\•`,�i,. `i % "�J^��-r'^ i • ' _�- � . _ � }v �%,e: � � ����,�wi �'� � ����' ?� ������..�. . � �� � y�� '+5 . .a . � . ,. .f'r. , t•"�,� '-1 �. � ' �� .. #4" ���... . � � . .�:� ? � ; �. lt; �i� �� !1� �!'i .. � �� � j� a,� � � ' � 4 :9 /A. .� / J'rt . ✓� . �V t I. "' y 11, �� �i � � �`! . � v J �" � ""'�, `.�. �6^.y :.�" `' . � a. y°i � � :� „�A ���� \� :y.• � �i . �. •,i��,,,��, . � �' -� ��`�'��<�� - ���� ;.Ca ����� �,��`., ' �� �• �f �ti' . �"�� �� . ` - 'r '��`" `.�' : - - � , '� �, �:.. ;�x . °� . ,��..�. _ . � � �•�. , ~ . . . �9. J=�` +.�. ,�` `�- � '�� t l � r�m .. g 5R „ sn, w ifiic 'a��. � � I� >;. ,.:. � `s?$3�� ��f � �' ♦ ,l �� • � � 4 � . �� ,� s � � {"� � � _ ,. t� ° . µ �� ��� � �� .�f'; �"�',. . �.R � � "a , ._ . ..;, . ., .... � , �,,:.. ,... _ .. ...,. . , .. `�"�7' �& � . �- �:�.�. r. ,�. . _r _- ,c � . , � ,..a�_ . , . . . t, � �- s, � _ �. n� . � � .. � . . .: :. � _ . ;•' � ` � � ` � �. � � "r,�� � `�' �' � �j ,.� t � � .,. � - . _ , _ , r � �,�:' ^r"m",y" s r�� ^�— Y{,.. 4y� � ��.' Y,,..::.. � , � � 9r i i _ a` .. {, 4 ";���" �.�•�,� �-.'� :� . r r �+.��s.�� . ,�.,+*r �y- ' � � �� ,� .y�ps � 1�� � 3a � � . � � �'�fo: �. ;L . �f`� - S' N�' � . . ..�. ,� �- � �. ¢ ,: �� ,�:. . .t � . � . . � _ � .. . :ii�'. 'i- . _ _ r .. � � - �`t;°-� � . ' � � �? �'� �- ,a��? - ' r_ G� � Kimley-Horn � and Associates, Inc. CENTRAL WAREHOUSE PARKING STUDY Submitted to: City of Clearweter Prepared for: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization 503 Cleveland St. Clearwater, FL 33755 Prepared by: Christopher Hatton, P.E. Florida P.E. Number 48905 655 North Franklin Street, Suite 150 Tampa FL 33602-4447 Revised, March 12, 2014 C� � Kimley-Horn � and Associates, Inc. Introduction This parking study has been prepared to review the need for parking spaces at a Church of Scientology facility located in the southeastern corner of Hercules Avenue & Calumet Street in the City of Clearwater, Florida (Figure 1, Project Site Plan). The proposed building will consist of approximately 89,577 square feet of warehouse space. A portion of this proposed facility will provide for the relocation of existing "folder and file" storage and associated staff currently located in the facility immediately to the north of this site and across from Calumet Street. The proposed site will include 10 parking spaces at the southeast corner of the building; as well as, loading docks to accommodate up to two vehicles. The methodology for this study is consistent with the guidance provided by Bennett Elbo to the consultant team as well as the previously approved study methodology that was utilized by Florida Design Consultants for the October 2011 Calumet Warehouse Expansion Traffic Analysis. The proposed building will replace an existing 5,000 square foot single story building which was previously used as a call center with approximately 40 workstations. The existing building will be demolished. The Church operates its own bus system within Clearwater. The Church buses circulate between the residential areas for many of the staff members and the downtown campus of hotels and church facilities. The Church also operates passenger vans that provide direct access to the existing and proposed warehouse facilities located at Hercules Avenue and Calumet Street. These passenger vans will provide the primary access to the proposed site addressed in this study and will typically use the on-site parking spaces when loading and unloading. If a bus is required for access it will park in the parking lot for the existing warehouse to the north (2000 Calumet Street) consistent with the existing operations of that service. Bus pick up and drop off occurs at the adjacent Church property (2000 Calumet Street) off Hercules. The buses pull into the gated Church property where they pick up/drop off. The Bus schedule is as follows: • 9:30am • 11:30am • 12:45pm • 5:30pm • 6:30pm • 7:40pm Parishioner Records Drop Off and Pick Up consist of 6 runs per day with a standard box truck. This reliance on private transit service greatly reduces the needed parking to serve the proposed warehouse facility. Warehouse Functions (Proposed) The proposed warehouse functions to provide records archives for the church. Various operational church records are stored in centralized warehousing. The Church staff delivers G� Kimley-Horn � � and Associates, Inc. records and arrives by van or small truck and stay at the facility for approximately one hour and then return to their home facility. There are 6 staff persons that will work at the facility and two of these deliver parishioner records to downtown Church facilities using a box truck or van. Staff that work in the warehouse arrive and depart by van or via a bus that arrives at set scheduled times. The vehicles that will park at the facility are one box truck and one van. There are a total of 89,577 square feet of proposed file storage at the new site. This activity will be supported typically by 3 to 8 staff members and a limit of up to 15 staff members. These staff members will arrive by a combination car, van, and bus. Citv of Clearwater Parkin� Requirements The proposed warehouse is located in the Industrial, Research and Technology District (IRT) Zoning District provided for in City Code Article 2, Division 13. The proposed uses in the warehouse all have the requirement for 1.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building. The proposed warehouse has a Clearwater Code requirement for 134 parking spaces. Parkins Needed for Proposed Warehouse The warehouse operations will routinely include a total of 3 to 8 staff working at the warehouse with up to a maximum of 15 employees. Consistent with the policy of the Church, these employees will be typicalty transported to the site by the Church's privately operated bus system. The review of proposed operations to be provided at the proposed warehouse indicates a maximum need for not more than 8 vehicles including trucks based on the following worst case assumptions: 12 Routine Employees 3 Visiting Workers 2 Trucks x 20% x 100% x 100% a a 3 Spaces 3 Spaces 2 Truck Spaces The proposed site plan provides for up to 10 parking spaces and 2 loading bays in the loading dock area. Since most if not all employees will use the bus system, these parking spaces will be seldom used at more than 60% occupancy. These assumptions are more conservative than the calculations provided for the warehouse to the north of the proposed site prepared by Florida Design Communities (Calument Warehouse Expansion Traffic Analysis - October 2011). Therefore, it is requested that the proposed warehouse be approved with the reduced parking proposed. Summarv and Conclusion The Church of Scientology proposes the construction of a new 89,577 square foot warehouse facility. The Church's passenger van operations supported by the Church's bus operations will be the primary means for staff at this facility to arrive and depart from it. The proposed site plan provides for up to 10 parking spaces and 2 loading bays in the loading dock area. Based on this review and information provided by the Church of Scientology, the 12 proposed parking spaces are anticipated to be adequate for the proposed warehouse building and it is requested that the site development plan be approved such that additional parking spaces are not required beyond those indicated in the site plan. F � �ALUM��' '�'VAREHUCjSE E�'ANSI�IV S'iebmirleJ to: Cit}� af Clear�vatcr Prepttred for: Churcb� nf Scientolog�v �"lag Servicc Ur�anizfftion SQ� Cleveland Street Clearwater, Florida 337�5 !'repared by: R+ny E. Chapm�n, P.C. F'1. P.E. Numaer 34�t3S rlorida llesign Cnnsultants 303�I Starkey Boulevu�d New Pqrt Rirhey, F1or�du 34GS� October 11, Z011 �'DC File iVo. 2011-�434-10.U] �RfOk�U�1. 1:ECE!�'}G , � � j�i i'� ?L�1ii:IhfG ��?A6'TNtE;��i t::ii G� 4'.t�.4N/,11E• Lntru�uctiGn "This p�riti��g study h� b�.�n p��ar�d �n r�rieu� t�z need 1or ��rkin� �ir�c�a �ic a Cbv�•ch of ScTent�i�g}� facility lucatar� in the n�3�thcasi c��r�e: ��f 1-i�r�u1�4 A��evue azad �'�lumet 5�eet L� the �;i�� oF Clean���r.:, Flc+rida (I+'igure 1, ?;o�e4i i.t�c�t�t?n �•lap) The �i�ii�� L��ilt�jn�. at ►.his l�cati�ii i= l�rtivn :ts Eh� CZllti''�.1 Wffi2b�llSP nn�7 .:u�t��s S�,�Ot� syu�rc fe�.i tsE },�f sp�Ge "iT�t. C�nu41� prcoo��� ro acld i2,�L��� sf. aF.��sce ct� ��1P °);ySh;��' })ll1I�17ib: J"eSUI��n� in ; �r,sal of 7t�;�00 s[ nf s��ac� inside the buildiri�. �Th� ex,sung 5uildiu� h�s �i ��rking spaces tacat�c? �n tkle na��tt�t�es� p�:bur� ot �e sir.e and � r , �.��rhn� sp��s l���atecl ��i t��e 5o»��:zasl s�ci�c�a o? LY�e prnpr:t�[��. T;iere pte a,ntal �: 1'�`���ng Sp8C�;5 GulTe;ftl� �,r. t►��prt�peri_y. 'ifi� ��hureli oper�tes it� o�vn bt:s s;��stem ;��ith!n �le:arwLLter. "I1�e Lt�w-cb bu.;4s circulat� betvreer: che ��sidence at���s for man}f of the staii rnetnbers, the d+�;��ntot�n h�tels tirr �•i9iun� parishion�r, thp do�wntown churct� f�tri�ili�s, � n� �1?e �;e[ural W��etiou.s�. ?7!is cedvices rnnch �Y th� parki :e dem�nd ai ���� Central «rarehc�tt�� t�cility. LO L.entral ti�'arebonse �'u�etiunx 'There are a numb�r �f di$er�ot c�per�t�ans th-3t �re I.oiLed w�thln thr k�uilding s� [his I,.acation. Tl�ese funct�oiv include t�e fbiln�vin� I�3c�rei L�cirv: 'I'iu� is tlie centrai laundr� for ��e t�c�t�l� c�perated l�y llie C'.,hur�h in �i���aiitu�vrs �le�-ri�:it�r. i'�het� �]'F t���� �t��� iti�i ���)C)c at t�>is fiu?znt�n. One persar. arri4�z �i 7 a.ni.. using �: cat ar,� 1ak� �c ta clnwntc�wn Clearw�t+:c tc�r luncb, r�eturn!ng an th� Churc!1 t�+L�: ��± the gfcernoon. The oth�r n;�o ,tsff persons u�e �he bUS to reach tl� Cencral RTarehausc. �'�. tn.�ck is �ire;�i hy the laundry facility ta p�ck up an� tlr��ver l�ndry at t�ie cl�ur�t� nu� hoteis. �rh�n ic is nc►1 msJr..in� delr�enes, it u paikad �n � ln�ii�� �r�ea in fit}nt �,f the far3ancin� p�Tlir�r ��f'the bui!��t�g. Th�s truck p�rk�� luc.�tior, �s n�± �n � m�rked pnricuzg �par.e. Nlotnr-�o�l ��lai�tenance; 7tiva mc�e,h, nics u:e d�e mc►[orpool ty�rtian af �he buylt�in� �J�t� , ;:e; v�ces Ih� Church's flee; aF' te� buses �ci �.he �thet �:n� �,_es Tl�e Ci�uc�h'r �rs azie� van�. They bath �se tk�e bu� sen�i� far aecess tc� �n� f�om tEi� �enu�l i���rehause. ,'� BaoksrCL�s�L�73s. ��e:e are f��ur stafi tl»t ►vork �n tlus pntt�on af lhe hi.ilr�vi�, �:�ey ' dist7bute ti�e �any t�Of��:S 3�tr� C�E�:!'t�IliC iterns ca th� Ghul�ch m�mhers. `I'hs� ':rrive �y bus �nd �ise a van �c dzliv� ��zti�s;. tct th�: t��'�urch'� l�cau�ns in do�,�n�u�hm CI_ar�t�ater �ti�ir�l Pr�cesalns t�r�e staf;'persc�n handles appfos���tely 3f�U,tj�li;i Gti�e��, �f r��u! each `veek. �'l-�e p�rs�n uses thz Church bu:, t� acce�s t.�� �entr�l tVar��ou: e t--�c�rd� !�rcY�ives: M��� �3r�as of the �h��tch��, c,Pe�.tions sicn-e recr�.re+s :n thi�= �rea af t�� r�uil�ir.g. Th� ��;u.Tcn st�?�# �ka�t �i�l�vers r�co?�da intc� th.i� ar��a �f the b�iI�i�g s�i��e b�, ,�an, �t�r� at tti� facil�ty ft�r i.ss t11a� une huu; aitd rHtw� t�� Uieiz a•ori.p(sce hy van. ?RIC3N•.`° + --��^Fr�, � , ; �, �.•. ; r. ,� .. , . . . . � � l: ". 5� ,". i ,- Patzs'.var.er Rccc,rdG: 7here ar� fuur staf# �ers�ns l�it.li t%dt}!'k sc t1i� l�cility an�3 hz-o ��f tn� :�ia..�' �zliver �►anstuone: recor�s r� da�vacown Chu;ch i�cilitie�. 7�k►�s� scaif arri��e 3�,r a c,•rrlautatiCn r�F �r� �-a�1, and bu;. ��:� ex�: �in� 5ta.�f sllc,catic�ns a,ii'n,n the C�tc�l t�ure�?fltise a��r ;�b�±���xr'rz��d in "T'�ai�l� � i h�s iaL-:e :a�i�te�� the a�-nuunt 4�1' sp�e� �ll�.�c3t.°.t� [0 i'.3CF7 1Ly�, �he mimb�r �f stat�f �VOr�:sn� ir, ���h ar��: af ihe buildir.�, sad the r�eti�pd �f �-an,�onati+�n io th� fa�il�h� L;s� �f �;�u�n-:h tIP�C�TU?'f6C10II 1liClUdeS t2)�' t1Ua. '��.i,, :r:d t��c:ks uperat�d ���� th� t�.yur�.h. The pr�.��.`osc�d I2,Ot)U sf, expat�sior_ tc, �h� 1r �L1t�� u��l� i,c u�e�s tr� :��-E�as�: t�e. si3e of t�e ��aristu�T�cr i�.e�brda sciction of tb� swcrare. FigurF 2 ul�i��tes t}�� prc�ppa�d buildin�; ext�:i�� iacation. 'Chis expa�sion u�iil �ls�+l,� �ectrmr�a;�ied by an ,r,�-eafi� in si�F�trr�m Ehe ;�isun� � persnns to b pzr_=ons. Ti�e addit�o�a� .2 stnh ��vili use ti►e �_hur�h hus t� r�aci� tt�e facality 'The exFectecl persOru�el allar.atitm is 5ii��.�� in ti�e k�crii:�m purtioii �f Ta�lc t. . i� Cit-. of Cle�r�r•eter Farki�� I�eq�ir�ment� fiie i:�n�-al tiVarelj�us� iacilit�� is io�ated in the [ndus�r'aL Resaarch :3nd'i'ect�r,ology L�istnc: (lk i 1?ort�ng 1�ismct indicat��i ir� t�iry C�tide Arta�.l� :�, �'►ivis,�,t� 13 T;�� existi�g an,_l �ropuae�i uses in the t��lurnet a�areh�use all have a requir�mient For 7.� parkin� s�aa�� p� i,t10t> >i'. c�-t buildi.ng. The existi�e i8,3�0 ai. Builcling, [h�te�lc�re, li� a Clear,�•aier code ��quia�ement �For 87 �ar}:�ng Spa�e�. 'The 12,flU0 sf. expa�isir,�l ta 7U,34n sf. of sp��e r�u�ts :m : G�de reyuiremNnt cf � US parlang s�►sce� 3_q �xistine �'ers�nne] an�i Parkin� at tbe Ceutral W�arebuaar r'ti .st�dy h�s been conr3n�ted ta dei�smine tl�e u9a�e �f �he exisang building a�d pr��ing iaciliti�s ac ttn� Iacution from 5atw•day, Septembur 24. ?� I 1 ft�ruugh �'Ve�dne�day, Septzrnber '7, �Ql ! 7'�ie ��c�unt� :vere tak�n tt, deterrnine the ���rnber c�f .stafF a1 tl�e rac�li�! �nd the mL*nher af pau-king s�aces used �! various times auring the dsy i'lie tisnes sel�eted wer� 9��0 a.m., :��UQ p.rn., and �:00 p.m. Tii� variaus staff at �he f.acilit�� w�re idencifie�ci based ��n the ,�r�a �f [he F�Idin� ;� w�iieh t�ey ���oriced �nd the numbe� o� vehicles �n �ice ��t thai tiine. T�bie .�. identi�ies tll� r�stilt4: a2ltiis survey. 'T'ht� 8.r� W2lll�n the buildia�g w�se�a Ehp staff u�arked a�•e in�i�ted in t����s lable aS RecC�rds f.r �'arishiane� he�4rcfis, Arclvres Far R��ords ��rchiti�es, wiLh cbe ��th�rs :�s refo�u,eci ir the ��r�rit�ns indicated in Section Z.J �E thia r��c:ri. Th� �412i1 Pr�c�ssiZg �taf� was �.-�clt�de�l ►n �he cc��ant �i t�ie Paoks =-►aff. � ad�ition to th�' use., indi�.�tzti in Seciien 2.�, �a �ecunty p�r�n alu� p�[r��ly the site a�-�d �s jn�iL.�ted i� Tabl�: ?. '!"h.is peis�n �rrives �n a bieycle and therefoc do�s n�t usz a;�ri�.ng sp�te �'�� ��hur�h bus drops peoplz a�f Md p��k� �hem uF or� �tt�ter t-iercul�s Avenue ��r C."al�rn�t Stre�t. :�dciicic�r�ally, the siie r���v�s some c,u�side �eli�reries, such :� U't'�, T'pe�� traci:s norm�tlly, :t�nd alo�gndc the buildir� to �n�;e their t�ick-ups and tleliveries. A� indi�ared �<�rli�er: th�� t�ick usec by thr, laur��r� s�n-ic:e r��►.�11�' 15 j7�i�t�d ll] �?'J�71 t�f �1�c ��rtit,r, �F thc bLildi!ig rxc�pt v,�her> >t is mJtsr,,� deliver�e� anrJ d��e_r n��1 fss� a mLrked pr.rking agace T'he �s and � an� i�e IIyarkzd parkin� �p�ces Q� in�lic�t� i� ttu5 s�ady. the tuF.,�le5t DL11AO�i OI j?dPICiI7� ��a��E�ti iLS�d CJaS � r�r� i uesda�•r z�d �'�'ednesds<<. �RIC�It t � 'ECFN�:: •,r,�•;� � . „�> �.; ��.t► Parf�ine l�cecied for Ea!panviUn �f Bcu7dinL I'h� above i�orm�ti�� inc�c�tes �t,e :�ist[.Zg u5e fo� th� �'en�a! Warei�ous� �ud tt�e pot�ztsal �d�:tinnal parkin� nec�e� �or the �r�ans�an �rea. i ne e�:��ti.ng buildin� Las a maucimuir, garl�rie �eec f�r ���eh�cles. The i�,t?�t+ sf, e�ansi��r. vv�!! a�d 2 pe:-s�►�nei w��o u�ill t�e ihc e�sw� Church bu:: %�r acces� r�� ih�: i�uilding. Th4ref'arz�, thera ��l! not be :i necd t� �.panci tti� parlcirg space� tG� t7t« buildin�; e.�pan.einn As �ncl�ct�ied �►ot�ve, [!'�r;�c. ar� 1? rark�� pF3.T�:1Ii�, S�«C5 lUC.aC�� OSl Ll7e �l'P. iic15?� OR ltle COt7i3[5 ka!ten �!'id t�l� P1L��FC,1el� 'tt5ak`'�, lf1:TZ �; no n�ed �.c exp�nei ti�e p�fkitl� he}�ur�d ti�e ex�:.tiri� z���ce-�. T'a�r�fare, the fac�lil3� e��ai1�1411 :�1�i+71_'Ii� i►L• :3�?I}�'4Vf� �l'�ttlC�U� �'i� tieed tar addlki0[lsl �3.rk'tng m�Ces, 5 1) �ur�rnarv and Coaclu9iot� "rhe e::istin� 38,3U!? sf building �t �he �h�r�:h 4f �cient4logy'� CeritTal Watetr�i�,s� f��iiity is prnnosed �'c�r exp�n�iz�n by 12,0+'_l�:l ��, i0 .l tbtal of 7�,3c�4 s�. T;�e Cbur�h`� bus svst� �s the nr�mnr� mc�sns f'nr ttae rcafi�ar this iacility w a�rive and depart fram it. Sev-�ral war� �nd v�.ns ar� p�tl�ed in the iots rtt ibc Centra! �rV�rehouse nt varic�us s�es dunag tisc dav, 'The rz��,at beavily used pzrking ncc•urs on �i�eekdays c���i�� � msr,imum c�t �1 pa��ke� velnicles. �"he, t�;c�posed expansion w�il and ? employee� 1� ��±e Pbrishionet ReeCrcls se�u4n. t�cth o.f these r�e«� emplc�ye�-: evi s4 the Churr.h b;�s �y,tem !�► ar.c�ss !he Cenhal tVarehouse. Th� 3xisti�-!g f.'s�il�tc- na�lt ar4ed �arkin� spac�s and it is n:�t pr��,sztj t{� �YpflilfJ {�115 DL1IIlLti�1 v� spae�s �vii�'� �l�e b�f}�Jing a�rlitiun B�ed or? ttiz :�bove re��iew, �e e�istiug p�rlc�ng sp�.czs t�+ill be v.da�uate ftrr the proposer} build�n� expansion. 'The �i�e sl�ni:ld be a�prm'Cd Yi111 {�]c marke� parl�ng ro�Les as theti� cunen�Ly exisr. � .v.� .i --=cly[%u._+�u5r.�„��:/ra.n..:,.-.� ..I , ..l�.ia...,��. �L..= ..r�i:i�'f � t% � : ►.r'Ft'�'- , � Tab��e 1. STA1+� u=.0Ut�1`T Bl' BUILDI1�iG f'C�I�TI�N Exiscing Building runc�ions _ .. ..... ._ . .. _.._.._'-.,__.__ ._.s_ . ... _ . ......_�..... . . .. _..... e.T . . . ....... .... . ... . .....�.,..-_.' �"___... i ! Use Size ; N�. Sraif by !(�'o. 5taff in ; N�.'�taff u� ! � F'�nciion Chnrr.b ' private Car � � ; Tr�.ns�. � _. ._,.._! __.______ _._____._ _ __.. _ , � � L�Ct.i'i'�"� La.LLL?�' 3,`�)rJ 5t. ( � � ! � , � _ ` - _ � _ . ___---____ � _ ---- ,�__._,� _ . ._---;�— --- _ . .__ ' _ . �t__A�_ _.. , 1V1�tnr Pool & tire"nicle, I �,�t}�► GE_ � i_ . � �lain�en3zir..e ; — -�. - -__..__ � _ _ _....__v . _ ' � - ----- _____�__,__ _. _. ____ Baolcs, CDs; I��s �,3DQ s;. I -_ �_ � ; � �� � — } _.__�.�_---__ _ i Recard_ A.sc�iive� 1$.��:ii1 � i. {? � ;� .. _.....__ ."_... ..._. ... .�{ 1 ._ __.__""..___...____.'""` �'-"_ . . ..__ r-. _...�....�_._� Par�sh?o�?E� Rtaa�zis 24,OU�? s£ i �1 � i ; _._ _______ _ _.___ : i - _ __. ': I�1a�l ?�rc�cea�m� 3,C�(i(i sf. � i ���� �� � �C3'1`:�.L I`ropUS�i Bt�il�ln�, r�auct��ns Use ; i .�« __ __.---- __ �-____ ___ _ -- .�._----- ___ � �8,3{}0 sf. 1� 1� : I � � , — _.._--:� � _ __ _ __ . ___ _ _ __.._ ! �. _ _ ._______�---.--- -__ ..___. _ -- ------ - - �ize ' i�4. �taff by i�n �taff m' I�o�. 5t�i'�' iu � ; Functson ; Church �'riv�te Cat � I i • ' Trans��. ; �. - - --- --_ � ' Ce.�iral Launc�rf i 3,5C►� �[�. � — --- __._--- _.__ , � ' � �------- ' ?��2c�tor Po*.�l & ��ehicle 3:St►U � E, � �:�airtenance , _ __ _ -- -- - I Bo+�ks, CD�, ���s c,3GC� sf i� j F�.e�:ord� �r:.hivs� � ��4JG �f. 1 � PLnsi�ioner Ftecc�.ci� 4 36,t?l?t1 f. ''� � i t _ _,_ � 7V�:31� �tC�CFS51P.� ------ �.�.7��� 5±. r—� I ry t � __. _ _ __ __ _ _ _ .���.. T�,1 �i.L, ,; 1Q�>�� St. i i �ourc� • �t�l:, ;% i 3 � , I_ , _ . __ _ . __ --.. __ _ __ _ , _ -, �- _ -- � -, - � , . I _ _ , � , , �---- ------ � __ _ _ _._ �_ „__ .__ i � � � � �y - --_ i ` i_ _ _. _ _ ____ _ . _ _ _i__ _ _ _ ___--_ _ � �l I j ,_ __�_ __ _- ---- �..�- — - - --- � j � ' ) � , l I j -- � i i f ; � ----�.�- — - --- - - � � f -- � � . --_-__- � ._. � - ,�;;,,�,�1 -. � ��:yr,-, i. , .�,� , . .� . I'at�l� �. �alun'�cc �ui3diug �'�isting :St�ff an:i ��eh3cies 5 tv it i� e�icles Da}�iDate 1�rca 9:frti �hi 3:GQ Ph9 S:�tQ P��i 9:D4 r�t 3:U4 PhZ $:�)0 P1�L S4n:rdaJ,9j?:lrii Rccord� �� r ? 1 i Car � i 4'� ; 4�a� ��`uvta (} {3 Q n � U $�a1U � � I C� � 4 � �+,'en Moc�r,r�ai � � 0 ia t� � S i 1`v�.� i.nueory i � � 0 ��ar, I Tsvc4,j 1 Tcuck ; 1 7raci� Scr.uri�� i l 1 � ; ; rn� « � 3 =, � � -� 5par.e3 Gccup;cd ' ~ 1 � ? — _...... I 5�de�a, 9,'::�11 i Rxcords C 4 1 7�ar 1;•`an � 1�ar �'.rtflives 0 t� t� t; {J 0 Baol:� C :, 1 r� � i'b'an G h�at�, oa: �. ! C� �� I � r� Lsundry' 1 :i 4 ! C�r, 1 T'r'��ic; I Ttuck ! Ttvzl: $ecur:ty ) ! ( Tvt�l i ? t � a ; 5paeer. �ccu�a�d � �'� 1 P,tar.�+u,, 9l�cill ; Rt�anis �) 5 7��an i�'an � Var: A.zrJiive. f� il t} �} i V� Bq�ks � 5 C i� 1 4 an {} 1lhatc�oal FJ I : ' p � � t7 t� l.aun�dry i � Q i��, 4 Tn.ck� i Trsck i Tru.:k 5 e�.�uri _ry 1 i i �� (Total � t f, :i � 3 Spae�s f:ccupie�:� , " �L1CSt'�FI�'�41r?Ili blacortis 1 � 1 1 Van J`Jun 11res �P.tc:�ives U t ,:� Cl i:'r,n 4 $aoks C� � 1 C� 1�'an i� Trio[n:pt�al 0 � i �} i� : b�ar: C Ls�:n�ry 1 3 0 l� v, i Trucl: 1 Truck. !� rack Sccurity ! 3 1 � i otsi 3 15 3 " � y �aac�s GG�Upie�l � 1 '4��!t�DCSri_av, ���lII � PtifCOIdS : � 5 1 t��aa 1 tlau I i%un i,a��;�ri�Ys T c, � 3 G G i��iu r aau� o � 1 t� i � u�� = o 2,9etncpoa! D f �i � 1�':�r; 0 �.a�uu�ry i j - � j l���:. ! Tr.�.:f� � Tr�cl�_ ] 7"r�c�: Securit�� 1 ! 1 � Tecnl � i S � _; 3 � 2 �5pa�es Occupiea �' � .� � �7����. t�;;,�. � r:ur�r� r zr�nnci am���e_ v,a 4u,��cin. �FCf�i:, SG��r�e: Lhu:'ch of'ti�.i�ntolo,�,y xnd FUC, :�! l L1:��� C,4��JNf�T S�TRE�T t 0 � n u 2 4 J W � �w > a N ls� � � tSC W 2 PROJECT SiTE � � n�� j ro s�a� � CALUM�T ST�E�T ARD � a a W— ------ z _ � z � u�r LQ�AN SiR�ET y� _ .___. _.______.- ______--__ _____ .__ � � G�SCFI�IIL`:. PRO���T Ho_ EPN� � °RDJEC i LOCAi1QN MAP �4i � --t�fl34 � G - �,n; E, �� ; Ft DRtDA U,ES�CN C+O,NSiJ1� 7'ANTS, �IC. � 0/1 �,/�or i ��c ;,. � �Nu��ERS. El1VIR4NNENiAU5T5, SUP.VEYCpS 8 PL�AqEFtS i`,?LWN �Y =1orh�� 9nn, l::s cr H�r:�•p %� ;a'.;.' � _, (727� Bd5•`rSCF . � ;v. !�? . ',V6 iej,+? �£g � `" l�Car�n;�-1 e'C;• ilor:.. _.r,-�n ticnvuitu�•l:. ��.- .:nrN�:u� en. :,.. . ,,�. r;r .. ... _ r::,,.�r,, •. �,tr.�,{ ..-,.'e penr(t�+�j,t�'� ., r Ej .,-, I : �C:� � -� 1CL'�s�.C?IYA�A�. LCGEMn ��» _-W�: -+ d�..:.�� �;:� _ �:,",.,.� �s..,.,. � ,__. ;, � � � r . ..�.. �.... ,� ,� e ....�... u ,cKo � s.�er .� kY.'d' � ':7'CC. � .. � � 'n�`,�,� T°a7.�Lm� SQ�IO�N i,iCNiSWP IaS,Aa�OY �78 PINn(1.A5 I:UUTlI' L'. I'LOfili�,� ....cb �e w...r.me�«�.+manu !am�n.te�����.� I�.vmU:le-r.w�- :?BE3� L>'r 5HEE7'S T-1.1 CIL7l.9tfE Pl.►N .1.1 Llti0.'�CA►ER�IA N1.1 E�FAQRELEVATIONL '1YL' ' �J�1 I ir��- �-� I V� ~ �F's ��r�L �� °-�i r� c � �.i -��— � �`r __ �� e�. � '�'"_'T"__-- Cr...,...- CI1l.4MFf MIAPF�It1L'9Y yr,uma. 6WRC.�uME7 �' � ns�nw.ra� �Lau� —r�— fA ►t�+. C�1.1 . �, : �n N o W � J V, � � .� � S 0 I usNnscae� na�s _., , _ I. �1'_,�______1"—_'_�.. ..�`� ____ ^.'�—�� ti._�__'^�..�_ -- _.1_ ,_�. ' ( .. . � • . . . � I .. .. � k.i _ I . . �Y ^rt� � t P (. � � . . : E r � � -� ��p* _. .. _ � • � i � , i I � ., � ex►srw� r sTaar i � MltmCMRY, FMMB ANII � �,�,.,,�,. ALUMINtlM61JI101M0 I � a"'"'� �000 CAWMET STAF.Ef . . . .� . . � IJMM 3��3j� � ; . . �'�"�" E7tc�EtFY.53.H�NOVp) '' . . . - � . . . . - 7t � �� i ,; ' . � . . � . . � �� _ 1 , r .� ' j � tAEE PROtfCt1ON Ah6PRPSE ,�.' �. 'r "^'_�..�"�"w' _"_ �._�...__ �....'.��..��J.__ .._ ._.." —__—• _—• —..�_.�. � � .. �AT� _L� 1 : _ ' , nar«��n fYUiIA I f � . ' CALUMET STREET ; i TNf.� a s�+eue auMnNC a�a�a !f _ - I- I � PRUPf,?SEO PLAFff 11lATER SC�lEpUl.� " i I u-�uc.y�!!�� on.. . � i . . � � .. _. - .. ... �.. , M1NT �TA~�0��� I � , � • � w�l �I�w� i �� '! � . �j�i�1�i r.ar�r� /r �rt!+�oaea.�.wip�.� n�r�: I tonar.nr� r.�-: CJJ.11hET wnr�Haus� E7�ANSfON 706D C/�L1fNET 47 0.EM W 111ER fllsTes utiaac�vE ��� L�.� �'1.n�vr�c .4c Dt�•EU���cy'_ �ecernber 20, ?A! I �I'I'�' C�� �LE:�R�'.AT�R Pe,: C7}�nrr R�u d748, C�u;�;u:, F�ua�oa 3�75l3-479t3 M,�c._trfi� Srnrx� $uiu��r„ l[?D 5n�m� �1trn� �1��':��F,(:�.ruamA�,F�otui�� i3i ��i TfLC'�N:�V_" 11 �;� J�u"[�1�•• f'.l\ {���1 7f.17i"IOL�� Mr.lames 8ond CburFh 4f S�i�ataiog�•lFla� ��ervict 4r�anir.�cion, ln� 503 Claveland Street Cl,earwat�c, FL 3 3755 Rk;; Devclop�neut Oradiar - �'1,,4�011• )QD37 �000 Calumet Strc�i �)eat tw1r. �ond; 'Ttiis letter co�iitutts o Ueveloprnent t?rder pnrstran� ta Cvrnmtenity L�eveloprn�nt Code (CDC) 5ection �-20�.U.6. C�n Nt�v�tn6cr 15, 20l l. t��c Comrawnity Uevetnpm�:nt Board (Cll�} r�viewed ynur Flexible �ewelopmtent rcquesi to pernut a 12,000 s�quar� ic�ot huilding ac)dicion to an existing 39,943 square foat v��arehause in thc lndustriai� Res�urh and Tectuzulo�y [IF�7) DfSi�'1Ct �i�j1S� m jpt �� pf � I%,R� s�uare fe�c, a lot wydth of b58 feet (alon� Cal�i Str��t) and 328 fcet (alpng Harcules Avenuej; Front (south) sctbacks of =E7 feet �ta exisvng pa�vett�entj a��d 5� feet (ta existin� buiidi�y,1, �ot�t (westj setbncks uf 7� #'eet (to existing fmvementj und SQ feet {to rxisiing buildingjr sidc tnarth� setbuelcs a� 27 fcet (tn e:xistmg pavement) snd ?4 feet ��� �roposed �t�ildirt�;j, sidt {c3st) setbacks o�' t�0 t'cet {co cxiscin� pavement) and 157 t'cet (tn �rb�osed buildxng), v buiiding h�ight of I S f�et (to top of �lat r�naf of pmpo�ed 3ddiiioAj a�tt.i i9..�, fe�ct (to top of rnvf of existin6 Gnailding), and l?' parkfng s�c�s �s a Cvm�r�hen.qive Iniill Davetopment Projrct imder the provfsions af l:he Comaninity Developrryent Cotie sc�tion ?- 130A.C. 'Che C:DB AYPR�VED the opplication wici� the fatlaw�ng Eindings of �sc�. C�yr�cl�ions of'L�w 3nd Canditions ofA{�praval: �'indinQS of Fact� I, Ti�at t�e Gve acre subject propercy is l��:�ted at the rrorihe<►st evmer 4f� C�lum°t 5tre�t and i-�crevIcs Avenuc: ?. 7i�at the subject property is located within the lad�ial, Research nnd Iechtsolo�v (IfLT} bistriet and the I ndustrie! Linuted (1L) �trurc L,anB U5e rilun cutegoty; �'Ii�e site is current1y in�pt�ov�d wi�h a 59,9�#3 squaro fcx�t af �!rt�ss llaor arra warebausr i'acility I:nown �s the �entra) W�rei�ouse.; � The subjecr prvr�rty hns a lat nree of 21?,$Jt� square f�et �S ncres}; a lat wicikh csf f�.4R �eei {slan,� Caiun�el Street) and }28 fee�t {alan� Hsrcules Avenuej; i The mrucimum nlluw�abie t�AA is �1.65, the proposed CAR is Q33; � The maYimum atlotiv�bie ISR is �7.85, the Pro�sed ISR is {�.5�1: .��. ��.. .�_..., ���-- Dcvrloprtxnt 17�rdsr FLD3E►11-tna37 20UD Calumcs Strcn ��� i. � 4 � n. ll, The applicauon proposes �o e�.�arid tLe �xi�tink waithvuse iaciliiy by addang �r 12,UUU squ�re fooi adcLition [a �t�o�nmadn(e Iar addi�ional rer,-ord ncChiyes sit�rn�c: The buitding sdcii�ion will be l S feat in he��t {w tlat rrxi! � and 19.2 teet i �o to� ef ro�f oF existing huiltiin�); The d�velopment proposes ta de�,re;�se t)�e number ��f oil=s�eei parking sp3c�s F�arn :�� to �t � spnces; 'The �ub�itted parkin� dea�runnd $tudy dcmonstt�t�s that l2 n�f ,slrret pArking spaccs �vi1l bc adequatc far pazking nzeds f'or thc xarehc►use facility duci�g a1( }�riods oC hourt of o�ralion since the Church's bus system ;s the primary mcana for il�e stai'f co arri��e and depan a€ this i"acil'sty; a�fd There are no ac:tivvs Ccxle Enfiarcemene cdses %r thc subjce� prvperty. Conclus9oes uf Lqw: ! Thai the develapmen2 propc,sal is cos�sistent wid� t#�e Swnd�cd: as �r S�ccion 2-13t11 1 ar�d Tab1e 2-13{�4 df lhe Carnmunity Devclqprnent Code; � That the dey�alopmeat propasat is consisicrn w;ih the Ficxibility criterin n.r per Section == 1304.0 ofthe Comrnunity L�evelopmPm G�de; nnd 3. That ihe devoloFraent pcopo�al is coasistent wiilt thc Geiroerel Standr�rds ror Levei ?wa Apprvvals ris per Secticm 3-ll4.A aFtl,e Cammw�iry D�velopment Ctfdt: _ Canditions ot Annrav�al: l. 'i'ha� a �uildin� perrnit I�ui)di[�, improvementsT � ebtuin�d Cvr ihc parkir�g lot imprrnrem�nls. landsc�ping pnd Z"I'hai an autosnadc pem�anent icrigatioa 5yster� shail be provided Cor complere water cov+er�ge far a!1 requirecl and other lands�ping materiat5 and mauntwneci as a futly functioning system in order to preserv� the landacaping in � hes�lthy S,rowiag cntuiitian; and �_ That �tior io the issuanec uCa CettiGcate �nf Oceupau�cy �11 �f �tte pmros�d landsc�pin� shall �c ur3talled. P��csuant tc� �A� 5ectian 4-�!t?7, an �Npiit�tion ftar a build'rng perrnit ur alhcr apprQVals shall be mada ��rithin ona ye�r oF th� dat� of Fl�xible Develapmpnt apprnval �by Deccmbcr '?t). 2012). AU iequired certi�cet�s ai ocauFancy sba�l bc �btaiaed wsthin twn years �t'thp d»t� af is�ce �f the initie! buitdin� pennit. Thc lwildit�d vermit i�t�t be abt�irt� within siY-[I]on � of_ tlie initiat permit atmlication. Tt�is ticneframe ts� abtain �he iniiiul b�iidin� permi� rn�y be extended i`ur an additi�nal six rnonths Tor cause by tha Comrnunity Developmer�t Cflardinatar. Tirne frarncs do nol change with successive owr�ers. The Cummunity Development �oo�dirratar mny �ant an extensian of time far tlie Flexible Develapmeni �pproval for n period not to excred �nc y�esr and only within the �rioir�l period of vaIidity. Thr issuance af this Developmenl C�rder does not rs(ieve ��ou of the n�Gessity tv uhtain any building permit� or pay any impact fees that may be required_ In vrder to facilit�te. the issnarue ot any permit or license affeeted by this approv�l, plcase rrin� u copY nf �his lecicr wfth you when appiying for any permsts 8r licer�ses that reqvir� this pRVS developm�m approval. A�iditincally, au appeal �� a i,�vel Tw� apptavat (Fiexible f3�ve)c�pmentj rnay be initi�ted pursuant ta �DC Sectian 4-502.8 by thc npplic.�t or try an}� p�rsox� �ranted pany scatuh ,•�1hin � Gc+,�ciapment 4rcitt fI,D201 l•1U037 - 2U{1D Cal�imct SUccl Pa,�e i 1�l days of the dalc oi' the CDB meetin�. The Filin�, oF an applicat;c,rilnatice at �ppcal shalt stuy ch� cffert of the decis�o�� pending the t�nal det�rminatir�q af che css�. ih� opp�al periad for yau� casr ex�,ires or► Jnnuary 2. 2� 12 ( l4 �ays from tht date of lhe CDB rneeting�. lf yr,u have any quesuar.s, please �io not h�i��� to cail K��in W Nurnt�erger, Pt�ner llL ai '72?-562-�l�b7 ext. ?54?. Ss�cere)y, � f - blichael Delk, A1CP Pl;u�ning & Devcloprne�i Qitecior T � I� i l � I �9. r�^��' 11 ' j ` i :, �� � i �i t a� i ': & �, ; i � �• i � ! i �I I , i '"_'."" �_ _ _"..�.__ '__ _____ �_—._.__. �.�_� _ .. ... .. . �_ � r i r' i r � 1 f i :� : . - �.. ^� � r e � . � ♦ t 1,�f /� �iWU�[.' r � � ifl��t �� T, � �,� !A= ' - :rt= :r _�.-� `.-.�.:._3e'=.'1 �� -."' '_ ' . P -� _ � :i'� i � ---�r- _ o ♦ r' t _ r .+ _ J 'v __—J' �� �.. , "_ '�' ' i � � ��7i� ,f �'�; / - .. ' 4� �Mww 1 ..�.�- �.� �' �'. �r � �.��— � C �,�j' -- '� . ' .> � - ` — — ' �or ' . �% LLLLLLL_LL_LL i_� � `i LLL >.�._ � ' �� � -4--_ ��.— � !�'/� ; �, i i LL-I-�� �--'�I_LLLLL_L.�LL'�L' ,� � .�r r — � :% " LLl_.L`LL'_LL�LLLLLi_.i_L!_I_ i.� •°"'r,' . "� l. LL.LLt.L LI_LLLL�L' ��LLL I} r �„; "°"'" �� =� LLLLL�.LL�LLI.LLLLL.L�� L�G i L '• ` L ��LLLI_LL! i_LLL __._._--.---' I � '�'°`" �"' i..L_ < � r�iu��r,riurcwMO LiLI_L �. .. ., . f ' r ���� � �,o.,.�" ', !, !,.i �- �-�-� �unn+uMeudows I _ ,�� i i� _ •_- t � . d`,.. � . t'�"°'.�..'_ L�LL z�oucuuaE,a+�t �..± _L ;es�'/r,�'' i'. - ' I c �� ti l6.96! SF % � ` a.. u� m,c...., -� �.�.... � n we ( < �. I F7C rF !LlV. 57.47�NOVD) ` �— � �. . � � I ' LLLL"�����.�L!_I.. ' ��''� �_. -es. " � �L;:..Ll LLL_LLL�_LL_t_LL�L -`�'" . ' s i L'_� LLL ! L�-�LLi�LL '�, � �' r � _ -r Li.. � . k_L' 1 ' L_L _L 'K " „� ----�; .����'� " ." - -�._ ,,�.,.,._ �,���;� . , _--- � , y� * � •. . ,;.. j .% r. ► r' ,, � � i W'i��- fi / � � � � . i� --_ ' '�� IS •-` �, � �+ . e a - � L 4`,�,ti�. .` p..�. � ti i�:�-'� ,�+S rr --.�` a� r.� { K. � [......� .. .r' � ! CAIUMET WAqENOIlBE El(PAH.IK7N ScN�L ^lr �-' � 1� ^ ! I �a � �000C�1011ET8i. �ITBi Q�L7i Oi '�J�.I�(�i � FLiftBS �.� � ��.e` -�.� c+.+ cwn�at�vun "'°""' 11.� IAqDSY'./�PE ►1A1� � 'L"0.,.'° � e•a't }�rf.�i�1' �t.l G%rEWORf�[YA71aN9 � ±�� �tG4 9•. � � „�tis,.d� �� r�,, �X�� Z.