Loading...
DRC - DRAFT ACTION AGENDA - 04/03/2014 (REV. 04/01/2014)jr�`J' OFIJ`i CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT k Q POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562 -4567 FAx (727) 562 -4576 DRAFT ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Thursday, April 03, 2014 8:30 - Staff Review 9:00 AM Case number: FLD2014 -03009 -- 2871 GULF TO BAY BLVD Owner(s): Stowell, A J Llc 2873 Thornton Rd Clearwater, FL 33759 -4049 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Stephanie Tyrrell 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Mcdonalds Usa, Llc 10150 Highland Manor Drive Suite 470 Tampa, FL 33610 PHONE: (813) 630 -9634, Fax: No fax, Email: Stephanie.Tyrrell @us.Mcd.Com Location: 1.28 acres located at the southeast corner of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Cross Circle. Atlas Page: 300B Zoning District: Commercial Request: Flexible Development application to permit a 5,206 square foot restaurant with drive -thru facilities in the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 55,751 square feet, a lot width of 150 feet along Gulf to Bay Boulevard, front (north) setback of 4.57 feet (to proposed pavement for bike rack pad) and 52.7 feet (to proposed building), front (west) setback of 8.7 feet (to proposed pavement) and 74.4 feet (to proposed building), side (south) setback of 55.5 feet (to proposed pavement) and 205.6 feet (to proposed building), side (east) setback of 3.2 feet (to pavement), 5 feet (to proposed pavement for dumpster pad) and 29.9 feet (to proposed building), a building height of 15.58 (to top of flat roof), 19.34 feet (to top of parapet) and 20.25 feet (to top of roof cap element) and 47 off - street parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 704.E; an increase in the height of a wall in the side (east) and rear (south) setbacks from six to eight feet pursuant to CDC Section 3- 804.B.2; and a reduction to a portion of the front (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to 4.57 feet, a reduction to the front (west) perimeter landscape buffer from 15 feet to 8.7 feet, a reduction to a portion of the side (east) perimeter landscape buffer from five feet to 3.2 feet, a reduction in the amount of interior landscape island trees required from 19 to 16, a reduction to the foundation plantings along the north and west building facades from five feet to zero feet and an increase in the percentage of accent trees from 25 to 33.3 percent, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1202.G. 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Proposed Use Neighborhood Association(s): Presenter: Workflow: Restaurants Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Glenn Ellen MHP Assoc Matthew Jackson, Planner III Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 03/04/2014 Jackson Fire Review No Comments 03/13/2014 Keller Traffic Eng Review Comments 03/13/2014 Elbo Parks and Rec Review No Comments 03/20/2014 Reid Land Resource Review Comments 03/20/2014 Crandall Environmental Review Comments 03/20/2014 Josuns Stormwater Review Comments 03/24/2014 Spearman Harbor Master Review No Review Required 03/25/2014 Jackson Solid Waste Review Dumpster enclosure looks fine. No Comments 03/26/2014 Pryor Planning Review Comments 03/26/2014 Jackson Engineering Review Comments 03/26/2014 Shannon 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Summary of Comments on P: \12- 015 -MDC (McDonald's (9 -2528) - 2871 Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Clearwater) \Drawings \McDonaIds Restaurant - 2871 Gulf to Bay B am = Author: LMOREDA Subject: Text Box Date: 3/27/2014 2:35:24 PM 2871 Gull to IIEllay IIMrI1W. , Author: RROWE Subject: Comments Date: 3/27/2014 2:21:02 PM Per Debbie Reid, no issues - commercial project - with less sf building footprint. am Author: SJOSUNS Subject: Conditions Date: 3/20/20144:12:17 PM ENV - General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62- 621(2). 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/26/2014 10:58:27 AM Prior to CDB. Please clarify how in the parking demand study a double drive -thru lane is expected to reduce the number of off - street parking spaces needed. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Comments Date: 3/19/2014 9:26:08 AM Prior to CDB - Revise to read "Setbacks" not "Building Setbacks" as setbacks are measured to all structures, notjust buildings. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Comments Date: 3/19/2014 9:26:18 AM Prior to CDB - Revise these numbers to include setbacks to structures, notjust building. Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 3:26:14 PM Prior to Building Permit: 1. Please add the following demolition notes to the plans: - -All utilities shall be cut and capped prior to demolition. The Wastewater Supervisor shall be notified. -- Demolition shall not cause any service interruptions for other utility customers. - -Water meters, double- detector checks and backflow preventers are owned by the City of Clearwater. The City shall remove and retain these items. Author: SJOSUNS Subject: Conditions Date: 3/20/20144:12:17 PM ENV - Prior to issuance of a building permit: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464 -4422) for more information. Author: ellen.crandall Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 1:00:34 PM DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/26/2014 9:53:21 AM Prior to CDB. Add a note to the plan that all signs will be reviewed under separate application request. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Comments Date: 3/25/2014 2:37:54 PM Prior to CDB. Provide the distance from the property line to the north edge of the bicycle rack pad. /Author: MJACKSON Subject: Line Date: 3/19/2014 9:56:01 AM ""Author: BELBO /Author: BELBO Subject: Oval Subject: Line Date: 3/14/2014 9:55:56 AM Date: 3/14/2014 9:35:44 AM ""Author: BELBO /Author: BELBO Subject: Oval Subject: Line Date: 3/13/2014 5:04:07 PM Date: 3/13/2014 5:04:07 PM Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 10:30:10 AM Prior to CDB. Minimize vehicular conflict points by removing one of the two right turn only egress. If a full access driveway is desired along S.R. 60 (Gulf to Bay Blvd.) then applicant shall acquire FDOT approval. Traffic Engineering recommends that the driveway operate as a right -in and right -out only. Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/14/2014 1:34:43 PM Prior to Building Permit. Provide hand railing to comply with 2012 Florida Accessibility Code For Building Construction. Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 10:35:27 AM Prior o CDB: 1. The submitted traffic impact study is not acceptable at this time, please see Traffic Engineering for comments. Prior to a Building Permit: 1. Obtain FDOT permit for driveway access or other work within the state road right -of -way. General Note(s): 1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 2:38:04 PM Prior to CDB. Revise the 3.2 foot dimension to reflect the distance from the east property line to the outside edge of the curb. Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/21/2014 11:06:10 AM Prior to CDB. Provide wheel stops where parking stalls abut a sidewalk to prevent a parked vehicle from over hanging onto the pedestrian walkway. /Author: BELBO Subject: Line Date: 3/13/2014 5:04:07 PM Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 2:38:19 PM Prior to CDB. Staff only requires a 12 foot wide travel lane on the east side of the drive -thru lane. As such, reduce the width of the drive -thru lane to provide the required five foot landscape buffer along the east property line. /Author: MJACKSON Subject: Line Date: 3/25/2014 2:32:29 PM Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 3:26:14 PM Prior to Building Permit: 1. As per Community Development Code Section 3- 1701B, Sidewalks required, Plan considerations, if the remodeling of an existing structure will exceed by 50% of the assessed evaluation of the property where a sidewalk does not exist, an applicant shall provide for construction of a sidewalk in an easement or right -of -way. If the property owner qualifies for an exception, the property owner shall pay a fee in lieu of constructing the sidewalk to be used to construct a sidewalk at a future date. Please show sidewalk in the Cross Boulevard right of way. 2. As per Community Development Code Section 3- 1907B, Sidewalks /Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per most recent FDOT Indexes #304 and 310). 3. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the Comments from page 7 continued on next page installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 4. As per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376, Use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited, no person shall use potable water for irrigation through a new or existing lawn meter on property where reclaimed water distribution facilities are available. If potable water is currently used for irrigation, then a connection to the reclaimed water line in Cross Boulevard shall be established. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 2:38:27 PM Can two additional off - street parking spaces be placed in the location shown? /Author: MJACKSON Subject: Line Date: 3/25/2014 2:38:27 PM Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 3:26:14 PM Prior to C.O. 1. A right of way permit from FDOT for any work in Highway 60 /Gulf to Bay Blvd shall be provided. Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 3:26:14 PM General Notes: 1. Only Sheets C4.1was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. 2. Any work in the Cross Boulevard right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be found online at http: // myclearwater. com /gov/ depts/ pwa /engin /FormsApplications.asp 3. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. am Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/14/2014 1:34:43 PM Prior to Building. Provide slope of ADA ramp. ADA ramp shall comply with 2012 Florida Accessibility Code For Building Construction. /Author: BELBO Subject: Line Date: 3/14/2014 9:59:30 AM Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/14/2014 1:34:43 PM Prior to a building permit. Install no left turn symbol (R3 -2) sign at the bottom of stop sign per current MUTCD standards. /Author: BELBO Subject: Line Date: 3/13/2014 5:04:07 PM am Author: TSPEARMAN Subject: STR - Condition Date: 3/18/2014 2:46:50 PM Author: TSPEARMAN Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 3:16:15 PM Prior to Building Permit 1. Where are cross sections A -A and B -B located in plans? 2. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit 3. Prior to certificate of occupancy issuance, please submit a copy of the approved FDOT drainage connection permit. 4. Please use City's rational method to calculate the the required attenuation. 5. The site is required to provide not only water quality but also quantity for attenuation. 6. Please verify that there will be no adverse impacts to adjoining properties. 7. Show roof drain collection system and direct to pond for treatment and attenuation. 8. Finished work at the existing driveway and any areas within the City's r -o -w shall not result in ponding issues. Temporary flooding of the restored area within the r -o -w may be needed for thorough inspection. 9. Show roof drain collection system and direct to pond for treatment and attenuation. 10. Flood Zone X - Design for 25 YR Storm event in drainage Calculations Page: 13 Author: MJACKSON Subject: PLN - Condition Date: 3/19/2014 9:56:01 AM Prior to CDB - Remove all detail sheets which do not require review until building permit. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/26/2014 11:17:40 AM Prior to CDB. Clarify if the typical wall section is for the wall for the dumpster enclosure only or if also for the proposed eight foot tall wall. Page: 15 Author: SJOSUNS Subject: Conditions Date: 3/20/20144:12:17 PM ENV - Prior to Building Permit Review: Continue to provide erosion control measures on plan sheets and provide notes detailing erosion control methods for Building Permit review. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/26/2014 9:35:13 AM Prior to CDB, Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1204.D, provide wheel stops for all off - street parking spaces adjacent to landscaped areas. Author: ellen.crandall Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 1:12:02 PM Consider the type and location of potential freestanding sig nag e in the front morht) landscape buffer. Magnolias are great shade trees, however a tree that natura lly is more limbed up (such as a high rise live oak) may offer better visibiI ity of sig nag e without hacking the tree later. Acknowledge. Author: ellen.crandall Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 1:02:15 PM Some of the landscape islands do not appearto be 10 feet wide, yet they have shade trees proposed. Shade trees must be a minimum of 5 feet away from impervious. Clarify the dimension from back of curb to back of curb on the islands and revise the island or the shade trees. Prior to building permit. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/26/2014 9:30:50 AM Prior to CDB. Add each plant symbol to the plant schedule table. Author: ellen.crandall Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 1:04:38 PM There Is a 312 inch deficit proposed (which may change In response to comments and Is subject to a final landscape Inspection) and must be paid to the tree bank at a rate of $48 per Inch for a total of $14,976. Acknowledge. Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Oval Date: 3/27/2014 1:13:01 PM ECRANDALL Subject: Oval Date: 3/27/2014 1:13:01 PM Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Oval Date: 3/27/2014 1:13:01 PM Author: ellen.crandall Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 1:07:31 PM Provide details of the perimeter wall that Is proposed. Specifically If tree #25 and #29 can be retained the wall may need to be pier and lintel. Author: ellen.crandall Subject: Conditions Date: 3/27/2014 1:06:42 PM Absolutely no trees are being retained. Understood It Is a tight site to design. Why are trees #29 and #25 being removed? It appears there may be as much as 10 feet between the trees and the top of the stormwater bank. Consider trying to shift the storm water pond away from the trees. Page: 23 Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/26/2014 10:00:59 AM Prior to CDB. Pursuant to CDC Section 3- 1302.C.1, the heights of the lamps shall not exceed 35 feet, or one foot in height for each one foot the light fixture is setback from the setback line. Along the north property line the setback line is 15 feet and along the east and west property lines the setback line is five feet. Author: BELBO Subject: Oval Date: 3/14/2014 1:49:01 PM Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/14/2014 1:51:51 PM Prior to CDB. Truck tracks impact the circled parking stalls. Is this restaurant a 24 hour, 7 days a week business? If so vehicle(s) parked in the impacted parking stalls are unacceptable. Furthermore, the drive through operation will be impacted, if is a 24/7 a week operation. /Author: BELBO Subject: Line Date: 3/14/2014 1:49:01 PM /Author: BELBO Subject: Line Date: 3/14/2014 1:49:01 PM ""Author: BELBO Subject: Oval Date: 3/14/2014 1:49:01 PM Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/26/2014 9:53:40 AM Prior to CDB. Add a note to the plan that all signs will be reviewed under separate application request. 10:00 AM Case number: FLD2014 -02002 -- 600 MANDALAY AVE 1 Owner(s): Xania Inc 1299 Main St Ste E Dunedin, FL 34698 -5333 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Joseph Erwin Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Planner III 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda 1121 Plaza Comercio St Petersburg, FL 33702 PHONE: (727) 480 -5181, Fax: No fax, Email: Joseph herwinllc @tampabay.Rr.Com Location: .03 acres located at the northwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Kendall Street. Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: Tourist Request: Flexible Development application to allow 562 square feet of Restaurant use in an existing 1,298 square foot building in the Tourist(T) District with a lot area of 0.32 acres (1,374 square feet), a lot width of 60 feet (along Mandalay Avenue) and 22.9 feet (along Kendall Street), a front (east) setback of zero feet (to building), a front (south) setback of zero feet (to building), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building), a side (west) setback of zero feet (to building), zero parking spaces and a building height of 12 feet (to top of flat roof) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2- 803.D as well as a reduction to the required foundation landscaping area width from five feet to zero feet as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Community Development Code section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Restaurants Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Planner III 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 03/12/2014 Jackson Engineering Review Comments 03/18/2014 Shannon Traffic Eng Review Comments 03/19/2014 Elbo Environmental Review Comments 03/20/2014 Josuns Parks and Rec Review No Comments No issues - commercial project less than 1 acre. 03/20/2014 Reid Fire Review Comments 03/24/2014 Keller Stormwater Review No Comments 03/24/2014 Spearman Planning Review Comments 03/25/2014 Jackson Harbor Master Review No Review Required 03/25/2014 Jackson Land Resource Review No Comments 03/26/2014 Anderson Solid Waste Review Comments 03/31/2014 Pryor Do to zero lot lines and past practice, we are approving the garbage service with residential Rear loading collection. 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Prior to Community Development Board: 1. It appears that the proposed outside seating is located in the Mandalay Avenue right of way. Would a 44 -inch unobstructed portion of sidewalk be maintained? Please show parking meters in relation to the picnic benches. 3/31/2014 Priorto Building Permit: 1. As per Community Development Code Section 3- 19078, Sidewalks /Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per most recent FDOT Indexes #304 and 310). 2. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 3. Grease traps are required on the sewer system for restaurants. Please coordinate with Rob Powers in Utilities at 462 -6660 x 227 on the required grease trap. 4. Potable water line and fire line shall be separate taps on the water main. 5. If any demolition is occuring, the following notes shall be provided on the plans: --All utilities shall be cut and capped prior to demolition. The Wastewater Supervisor shall be notified. --All existing utilities shall be protected during demolition. -- Demolition shall not cause any service interruptions for other utility customers. - -Water meters, double- detector checks and backflow preventers are owned by the City of Clearwater. The City shall remove and retain these items. 6. Please apply for a right of way use permit for any work in the Mandalay Avenue right of way. The application can be found online at: http: // myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa /engin /FormsApplications.asp General Notes: 1. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: 1. An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Contact Pinellas County Air Quality (727/464 -4422) for more information. 2. Provide erosion control measures on plans sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62- 621(2). 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Fire Review 1) To be addressed at building stage -must meet the requirements of NFPA 96 Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations 2008 Edition Chapter 7 Exhaust Duct Systems 7.8* Termination of Exhaust System. 7.8.2 Rooftop Terminations. 7.8.2.1 Rooftop terminations shall be arranged with or provided with the following: (1) A minimum of 3 m (10 ft) of horizontal clearance from the outlet to adjacent buildings, property lines, and air intakes Please verify code criteria to be met as the structure to the North not shown on plan 2) Separate plans for hood, fire suppression to be addressed at building stage 3) * Note: This is a D.R.C.approval only. Other issues may develop and will be addressed at building permit stage Planning Review All conditions are to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning Review Clarify the site area square footage on page two of the Flexible Development application as the site dimensions are 60 feet x 22.9 feet. Revise application and drawings as applicable. Planning Review Clarify all floor area amounts on page two of the Flexible Development application as none are consistent with the survey provided or gross floor areas of the three uses. For example, the gross floor area of the building appears to be 1,357.48 sq ft [(60 *22.9)- 5.9 *(2.8)]. And when you add the three gross floor areas of the uses (562 +639 +179) this equals 1,380 square feet and the gross floor area listed is 1,298 square feet. 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Planning Review Once the correct gross floor area is ascertained, update the building coverage amount listed on page two of the Flexible Development application as applicable. Planning Review On page three of the Flexible Development application, remove all information related to density as this is a commercial development and no dwelling or overnight accommodation units are proposed. Planning Review On page three of the Flexible Development application, provide the number of required off - street parking spaces. For 562 square feet of restaurant use, between four to eight spaces are required. Planning Review For criterion number one on page six of the Flexible Development application, while it is understood that no changes to the building are proposed, you still need to address how the development will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and character of adjacent properties. This is also important as the building exterior has been painted prior to approval of this application. Planning Review For criterion number two on page six of the Flexible Development application, correct existin to read existing. Planning Review For criterion number three on page six of the Flexible Development application, provide how the proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The response to the criterion simply restated the criterion. Planning Review For criterion number five on page six of the Flexible Development application, explain how the new building facade design is consistent with the community character as well as the Beach by Deign requirement that buildings be designed with a tropical or coastal vernacular theme. Planning Review For criterion number six on page six of the Flexible Development application, please clarify how the proposed hours of operation will minimize any adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory. Planning Review For criterion number three on page seven of the Flexible Development application, provide a response to the criterion addressing how the redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The response provided does not address the criterion. Planning Review For criterion number five on page seven of the Flexible Development application, respond to how the proposed use complies with one of the objectives a -f. Planning Review For criterion number six on page seven on the Flexible Development application, provide complete response to design objectives a -e. Planning Review For the description of request on page one of the Comprehensive Landscape application, provide the specific request of the removal of the required foundation plantings. A complete sentence is preferred. Planning Review For page two of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application, correct the spelling errors. Planning Review On page two of the Comprehensive Landscape Program criterion number 1.b, remove the response. Planning Review For number three on the affidavit to authorize agent, please use a complete sentence and correct the spelling. Planning Review Update the photograph of the building to show the existing conditions and to show all building facades. 3/31/2014 7 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Planning Review Remove all mixed use references in the parking demand study. For a project to be considered mixed use, a residential component is required. Planning Review Prior to CDB. Acknowledge that the outdoor seating will be requested through a separate Outdoor Cafe Permit application. Traffic Eng Review Prior to CDB: 1. If tables and benches will be used on the public sidewalk, then provide a minimum clear path of 44" wide to allow access for patrons /pedestrians on wheelchairs. 2. Tables and chairs are not to be permanently secured onto the public sidewalk. 3/31/2014 General Note(s): 1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). The TIF amount for the proposed project is: $3,607.33 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda 11:00 AM Case number: FLD2014 -03007 -- 655 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Clearwater Grande Dev Llc 20001 Gulf Blvd Ste 5 Indian Shores, FL 33785 -2417 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Clearwater Grande Dev Llc 20001 Gulf Blvd Ste 5 Indian Shores, FL 33785 -2417 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Housh Ghovee Northside Engineering 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33765 PHONE: (727) 709 -0943, Fax: No fax, Email: Housh@nortsideengineering.Net Location: located on the south side of South Gulfview approximately 894 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: Tourist Request: Flexible Development application to allow 181 -room overnight accommodation use as well as a exit only driveway from the north side of the buildings parking garage onto South Gulfview Boulevard as an amendment to a previously approved Site Plan (FLD2013 -03011 / DVA2013 -03001 / HDA2014- 02001) in the Tourist (T) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2- 704.E. Proposed Use: Overnight Accomodations Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Kevin Nurnberger, Planner III 3/31/2014 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 03/05/2014 Nurnberger Planning Review Comments 03/12/2014 Nurnberger Engineering Review See conditions. Comments 03/17/2014 Shannon Traffic Eng Review Comments 03/19/2014 Elbo Parks and Rec Review See conditions. Comments 03/20/2014 Reid Environmental Review Comments 03/20/2014 Josuns Stormwater Review Comments 03/24/2014 Spearman Fire Review Comments 03/25/2014 Keller Land Resource Review Comments 03/26/2014 Anderson Solid Waste Review Comments Solid Waste plans remain the same. 03/31/2014 Pryor 3/31/2014 10 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Priorto Building Permit: 1. Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per FDOT Index #304 and 310). As per FY2012/13 FDOT details, truncated domes are not required for sidewalks intersecting driveways. 2. Please apply for a right -of -way permit for any work within Gulfview Boulevard. The form can be found online at: http: // myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa /engin /FormsApplications.asp 3. Please provide information on the staging area and route for the construction materials and equipment. 4. As per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376, Use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited, no person shall use potable water for irrigation through a new or existing lawn meter on property where reclaimed water distribution facilities are available. Reclaimed water is available in the Gulfview Boulevard right -of -way. Please show the proposed reclaimed water laterals and taps on both the the site civil plans and landscape plans. 5. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 3/31/2014 11 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: 1. Provide stormwater vault specifications showing the vault provides water quality benefits and provide a vault maintenance schedule that has been signed and accepted by the owner. 2. Provide erosion control measures on plans sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. 3. No light shall be visible or extend in areas identified as Sea Turtle Nesting Areas during the nesting season (May 1 to October 31). Those areas where security and public safety require lighting, alternative light management approaches shall be applied. Provide evidence of sea turtle- friendly lighting in accordance with City code and state laws. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62- 621(2). 4. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. 3/31/2014 12 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Fire Review 1) Sheet C2.1 Shows the new Fire Department Connection, please show the location of the existing Fire Department Connection to determine location of a second Fire Hydrant Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building as hose lays and on same side of street as building. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 2) This building is a High Rise and is required to have two (2) Fire Department Connections please show the location of the second Fire Department Connection ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 3) Whenever a proposed development will be required to install one or more fire hydrants as a condition of approval and the proposed development will be equipped with an internal fire protection system (fire sprinklers, standpipes, or both) A fire hydrant shall be located within 25 -50 feet, as measured along a normal access route, of the fire department connection for such internal system. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 4) Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO D.O. 5) This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2010 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice /alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. 6) Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states No Parking, Fire Department Connection the address that it supplies and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2010 edition. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB. 3/31/2014 13 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Fire Review 7) Must meet the requirements of NFPA -241 Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations 2004 Edition 7.5.6 Stairs. 7.5.6.1 In all buildings over one story in height, at least one stairway shall be provided that is in usable condition at all times and that meets the requirements of NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. 7.5.6.2 This stairway shall be extended upward as each floor is installed in new construction and maintained for each floor still remaining during demolition. 7.5.6.3 The stairway shall be lighted. 7.5.6.4 During construction, the stairway shall be enclosed where the building exterior walls are in place. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 8) Must meet the requirements of NFPA 1 Fire Code 2009 Edition 16.3.5 Standpipes. In all new buildings in which standpipes are required or where standpipes exist in buildings being altered or demolished, such standpipes shall be maintained in conformity with the progress of building construction in such a manner that they are always ready for use. [241:7.6] ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 9) Must Comply with Ordinance No. 47.053 Radio System Regulations for buildings, install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 10) Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA- 241. All underground fire lines and hydrants must be installed by a contractor with a class 1,11 or V license. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 11) Must meet the requiements of NFPA -88A Standard for Parking Stuctures 2007 edition ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO C.D.B. 12) Note: This is a D.R.C.approval only. Other issues may develop and will be addressed at building permit stage. Land Resource Review Land Resource Review: 1. The Palms on the site plan are not graded. Please add an inventory chart that displays the number of Palms to be removed and the number of palms to be installed. This will allow for your tree deficit to be determined. Please include this on the demolition plan and the landscaping plan. 2. On the demolition plan, clearly mark all Palms to be removed with an "X" to specify they will be removed. 3/31/2014 14 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Parks and Recreation Open space /recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building Review permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727 -562- 4818 to calculate the assessment. Planning Review Planning Review: Prior to Community Development Board 1. The landscape plan does not match the submitted architectural and site plans. The landscape plan does not show the proposed garage exit from the center of the Hampton Inn building to S. Gulfview Boulevard. Revise; 2. This being one of the primary changes to the building the driveway and new exit should be shown correctly and how the new driveway affects the landscape plan; 3. The Site Data Table on Sheet C1.1 of civil site plans states that there are 81 rooms in the Quality Inn Hotel where based on the Termination of Nonconformity for Density it is 91 units. Revise; 4. In the same Table, the number of required parking spaces needs to reflect the additional 10 units so it needs to be revised from 206 to 218; 5. The narrative states a 9.8 foot setback to decorative banding but the decorative banding is not shown on Sheet C2.1. Clarify or revise; 6. General Applicability Criteria 1 states that 20 units from Quality Inn were to be suites. Approved staff report had 16 units being converted to suites and two standard rooms into storage. Clarify; 7. What flexibility to sight visibility triangle are you requesting on narrative page 2. Page 6 of narrative discusses that it has been approved but the new exit driveway has not been approved. Is it for the building in new driveway triangle? Clarify; 8. Provide a statement that discusses the proposed benefits to parking garage traffic circulation with introduction of new driveway on north side of property; 9. General Applicability Criteria 3 discusses a shared access for both hotels; removal of existing west access; but does not discuss the new exit driveway to S. Gulfview and how that may impact safety for pedestrians. Clarify; 10. Show and provide a statement on how the parking garage design complies with Sections E and F of the Beach by Design guidelines; 11. Encroachments into the sight visibility triangles were permitted because Traffic Engineering staff found acceptable warning devises at the driveway entrance as well as decorative colored pavers with a distinctive pattern to provide a visual mark to pedestrians using the public right -of -way, clearly identifying the entrance to reduce potential pedestrian - automobile conflict at the driveway entrance. What safety measures are proposed for new driveway entrance pedestrian conflict point on S. Gulfview?; and 12. That all Conditions of Approval as originally made by the CDB on May 21, 2013, will still be in effect and enforceable. 3/31/2014 15 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Stormwater Review Prior to to Building Permit: 1. Provide detail and cross section of proposed vault. 2. Show cross section of proposed swale around vault. 3. Show detail on plan to specify what will be done to roof collection system. 4. Storm system to north of site near Stair 1 is unclear, please specify clearly on plans the pipes, inverts, connections. 5. Finished work at the existing driveway and any areas within the City's r -o -w shall not result in ponding issues. Temporary flooding of the restored area within the r -o -w may be needed for thorough inspection. 6. Please provide stormwater drainage calculations showing underground vault has sufficient capacity. Please use rational method. 7. Recovery of vault shall be based on the double ring infiltrometer test performed at the proposed depth of vault elevation. Please note, the entire volume of vault shall draw down within 24 hours, not just the water quality volume. 3/31/2014 16 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Traffic Eng Review Prior to Community Development Board : 1. Passenger loading area shall comply with the 2012 Florida Accessibility Code For Building Construction, Section 503. 2. What is the vertical clear height of entry canopy relative from the walk/speed table? 3. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3 -904). Priorto Building Permit: 1. The minimum clear height throughout the garage shall be seven feet zero inches and shall be eight feet two inches for van - accessible parking spaces including ingress and egress drive aisles to these spaces. 2. Structural supports located in parking garages shall not encroach into the required area of a parking space. Structural supports shall be located in a manner to provide maximum vehicular maneuverability and shall not obstruct passenger ingress and egress. 3. Lighting levels in parking garages having public access shall meet or exceed the current minimum Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) standards. 4. All electrical conduits, pipes, downspouts, columns or other features that could be subject to impact from vehicular traffic shall be protected from impact damage with pipe guards or similar measures. Measures used for protection shall not encroach into any parking space. 5. Pedestrian - vehicular conflicts shall be avoided whenever possible. Where unavoidable, active warning devices such as traffic signals or flashing warning signs /devices and /or physical barriers such as vehicular actuated gates shall be provided to warn the pedestrian and slow vehicular traffic. Too many conflicts with pedestrians and vehicular traffic from the check -in parking spaces to the lobby /elevators. 6. Provide typical angle in degrees for the angled parking stalls. Angled parking stall dimensions shall be to the City's parking standards. http: / /www. myclearwater.com /gov /depts /pwa /engin /publications /stddet/100- Streets /pdf /12001.pdf 7. Please consider moving the building columns from the end of the parking spces to 18- inches from the ends of the parking spaces. General Notes: 1. Taxis and buses shall not stage on public right -of -way. 2. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each departmental condition has been met. 3. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 4. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 3/31/2014 17 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1:00 PM Case number: HDA2013 -08004 -- 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Mainstream Partners Viii Ltd 10165 N W 19th St Miami, FL 33172 -2529 PHONE: (727) 224 -6650, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Mainstream Partners Viii 10165 N W 19th St Miami, FL 33172 -2529 PHONE: (727) 224 -6650, Fax: No fax, Email: Mamerica @tampabay.Rr.Com Representative: Istvan Peteranecz Behar Peteranecz, Inc. 103 Rogers Street Clearwater, FL 33704 PHONE: (850) 377 -1870, Fax: No fax, Email: Istvan@architecturebp.Com Location: Atlas Page: Zoning District: Request: Proposed Use: Neighborhood Association(s): Presenter: 3/31/2014 1.60 acres (including a 35 foot by 240 foot portion of the South Gulfview Boulevard right -of -way) bound by South Gulfview Boulevard (west), Coronado Drive (east) at the intersection of Coronado Drive and Brightwater Drive. 276A Tourist A Development Agreement between Mainstream Partners VIII, LTD. (the property owner) and the City of Clearwater, providing for the allocation of 100 units from the Hotel Density Reserve under Beach by Design. (HDA2013- 08004) Overnight Accomodations Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Clearwater Beach Association Mark Parry, Planner III 18 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 09/06/2013 Parry Parks and Rec Review No Comments 09/12/2013 Reid No issues on HDA. Open space /recreation impact fees will be due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Engineering Review Comments 09/17/2013 Shannon Fire Review No Comments 09/19/2013 Keller Stormwater Review Comments 09/23/2013 Spearman Environmental Review Comments 09/24/2013 Josuns Traffic Engineering Review Comments 09/24/2013 Elbo Land Resource Review No Comments 09/25/2013 Anderson Planning Review Comments 09/25/2013 Parry Harbor Master Review No Comments 03/07/2014 Parry 3/31/2014 19 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. There is no need to include General Applicability Criteria as provided in Attachment C because this is not a Flexible Development request or application at this point. 2. There is no need to include specific use Flexibility Criteria as provided in Attachment D because this is not a Flexible Development request or application at this point. 3. Take the responses from Attachment D number 6 with regard to Density and Height and move them into Attachment E. Naturally Attachment E will be re- numerated when you remove Attachments C and D. 4. Please include page three of the application with your resubmittal. 5. This may be splitting hairs but the application says there are 216 spaces provided where I count 231. 6. Clarify what the hatched areas with the dashed red outline on Sheet A -204 for the north and south elevation massing studies are. 7. Please provide a transportation analysis as required on page three of four of the application. 8. Clarify if the special warranty deeds submitted last year are still accurate and reflect the subject property. I ask only because the legal description provided in Exhibit A of the Development Agreements includes some lots which were not originally included. 9. Clarify if the landscaping shown along the west side of the site in the right -of -way will be installed and maintained by the property owner or the City. 3/31/2014 20 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Planning Review Development Agreement Comments 10. Section 6.1.10 is missing. Please add this required section. Be aware that the City Council may deny the request if the submitted Development Agreement is not consistent with the approved format unless otherwise directed by Legal. 11. Section 6.2.4 is not worded as consistent with the approved format. Please revise so that this section is worded exactly the same as the approved Development Agreement format unless otherwise directed by Legal. In addition, it is unclear as to why any portion of 5th Street needs to be vacated with the proposal as this street is not adjacent to the subject site. I assume you mean S. Gulfview Boulevard. Revise as appropriate, please. 12. Section 8.5 is not worded as consistent with the approved format. Please revise so that this section is worded exactly the same as the approved Development Agreement format unless otherwise directed by Legal. 13. Section 14.1.2 is not worded as consistent with the approved format. Please revise so that this section is worded exactly the same as the approved Development Agreement format unless otherwise directed by Legal. 14. The signature page is missing Leslie Dougall- Side's name under assistant City attorney, leaves out the acknowledgement portion pertaining to the Mayor's signature and adds a section as to City section for signing. Please modify to be consistent with the approved format unless otherwise directed by Legal. 15. Exhibit A provides that the area of the site is 2.00 acres more or less where the application provides that the size of the site is 1.601 acres which is decidedly on the less side of more or less. Please clarify and correct as appropriate. In addition, the resubmitted legal description differs from the legal description provided last year although a new survey was not submitted. It looks like portions of some new lots have been added including Lots 8, 9, 12 and 13. Please clarify. Planning Review Design Guideline Comments 16. With regard to Section C.2 it appears as though one building plane on the south side is 102.5 feet. Clarify how this meets this Design Guideline provision. 17. Please provide additional information that C.3 is being met on the north and south facades. 18. With regard to D.3.a, it appears that the building stepsback at a height of around 40 feet where the stepback needs to occur at a height of 25 feet. Please clarify. 19. With regard to E.1.c, it is not clear how this is being met. Please provide additional information how this section if satisfied. Specifically when you say that the proposal follows some of the design parameters of the adjacent City garage and Hyatt Hotel. 20. Section E.2 is applicable, actually, but it is really more of an operations issue. I think that simple committing to meeting this will be sufficient. 21. The first part, at least of Section E.3 applies and needs to be addressed. 22. Please provide additional detail with regard to your response to Section F. This will probably tie into the your response to Section E.1.c. 23. With regard to Section H, please add some details with regard to sidewalk widths. 24. The response to Section K does not make sense. I think you are responding to Section H. Revise and clarify. 3/31/2014 21 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Planning Review Disclaimer 25. Please be aware that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the DRC meeting based upon applicant response to DRC comments. 26. Please review the stated request closely. It is ultimately the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the request and submitted proposal are accurate and consistent with each other. Solid Waste Review Need to discuss solid waste service levels. Stormwater Review 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 3/31/2014 22 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1:15 PM Case number: FLD2014 -03008 -- 23 ROCKAWAY ST Owner(s): Clearpark Llc 1001 E Atlantic Ave Ste 202 Delray Beach, FL 33483 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Clearpark Llc 1001 E Atlantic Ave Ste 202 Delray Beach, FL 33483 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Katherine Cole, Esq. Hill Ward Henderson 311 Park Place Boulevard Suite 240 Clearwater, FL 33759 -4904 PHONE: (727) 259 -6791, Fax: No fax, Email: Katie. Cole @hwh law. Com Location: south side of Rockaway Street approximately 100 feet west of Mandalay Avenue Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: Tourist Request: Flexible Development application for a Termination of Status of Nonconformity of a 14 -room Overnight Accommodation use with one accessory dwelling unit where the otherwise maximum permitted density is 10 hotel units and one accessory dwelling; a lot width of 60 feet and lot area of 10,440 where the otherwise required lot area and width are 20,000 square feet and 100 feet, respectively, under the provisions of CDC Section 6 -109 Proposed Use: Overnight Accomodations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner III 3/31/2014 23 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Planning Review Comments 03/11/2014 Parry Determination of Completeness Complete 03/11/2014 Parry Harbor Master Review No Comments 03/11/2014 Parry Engineering Review Comments 03/17/2014 Shannon Traffic Eng Review Comments 03/19/2014 Elbo Parks and Rec Review No Comments 03/20/2014 No issues (no changes to existing hotel /motel buildings /units). Reid Stormwater Review Comments 03/24/2014 Spearman Fire Review Comments 03/25/2014 Keller Land Resource Review No Comments 03/26/2014 Anderson Solid Waste Review No Comments 03/31/2014 Pryor 3/31/2014 24 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review 1. The Engineering Department has no comments for the request for the termination of nonconformity. Comments may occur if upon submittal of a building permit. Environmental Review General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Fire Review 1) * Note: This is a D.R.C.approval only. Other issues may develop and will be addressed at building permit stage. 3/31/2014 25 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. We need to clarify the current density. City records indicate a BTR for 14 hotel units where the application provides that there are 16 units on page two and 15 units on page three. On page three of the application is stated that the permitted number of hotel units is 12 but based on the square footage of the site, 10,435 square feet, the maximum density is 11 units. I need to stick with what the BTR is for. Exhibit A in one area provides that there are 15 units where 11 units are permitted and in another that there are 14 units where 12 are permitted. It appears that the official unit count of 14 units per the BTR has been consistent since 1997. The long and the short of it is this, we need to get the numbers to be accurate and to match across all documents. I need to know if there is an accessory dwelling which was brought up at one point. If there is then the permitted density of the site is one accessory dwelling unit with 10 hotel units where 14 hotel units exist. IF there is not accessory dwelling then the permitted number of hotel units is 11 units where 14 exist. Unless there is some forthcoming documentation which shows that there are more units on site than that, that is what I intend to stick with. 2. Perimeter landscaping is not required however, the Code does require foundation landscaping. A Comprehensive Landscape Program will need to be submitted. Beach by Design does require a three foot landscape buffering for parking. The lack of this buffer needs to be addressed. 3. Clarify the deal with the little building which seems to be attached to the office on the west side of the site along Rockaway - Google Streetview has it with a Pizza sign attached. I am guessing this actually on the adjacent property to the west associated with the Sand Dune Motel and has nothing to do with the subject site. Let me know if that is a correct assumption. 4. Clarify if the height of about 20 feet is from grade or BFE. 5. Please provide the phone number and email address of the property owners on the application. 6. Please provide the areas of all four attached signs. 7. Clarify where mechanical equipment is located and how it is screened from view from adjacent properties and rights -of -way. This includes equipment such as air conditioning units. 8. Clarify the means by which solid waste is accommodated. Clarify where the dumpster is located and how it is screened. 9. Clarify how parking works given a low, existing ratio. 10. Provide the timeframe with regard to redeveloping the property. 11. Since the building is required to be demolished by June clarify why we are bothering rearranging the parking spaces. 12. Please provide a detailed analysis of the proposed improvements to the site and building. You will want to include these details as you respond to the Comp. Landscape Program criteria and the TOS criteria. Planning Review General Applicability Criteria Comments 13. Criteria 1 through 4 - No comments. 14. Criterion 5 - Clarify the types of proposed improvements to the site and building. Include as much detail as possible. 3/31/2014 26 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Planning Review TOS Criteria Comments 15. Criterion 1 - While CDC Section 3- 1202.D does provide that perimeter buffers are not required in the T District there is a caveat that provides an exception to this rule in that the Old Florida District of Beach by Design does have perimeter buffer requirement. Basically, landscape buffers are equal to the required setback. The required front setback is 15 feet. The required side setbacks are 10 feet. Therefore, the required buffers for front and side are 15 and 10 feet, respectively. This is all per Beach by Design which is the default specified in the CDC. 16. Criterion 2 - I think that all you really need to do to address this one is mention that interior landscaping is required of parking lots in excess of 4,000 and that the actual vehicular use area is 1,067 square feet. 17. Criterion 3 - Provide a discussion with regard to how the existing signs will be brought into conformance with Code. Include details about the existing signs such as area and dimensions. 18. Criterion 4 - A Comprehensive Landscape Program application is required at this time because were essentially eliminating all landscape buffering. 19. Criterion 5 - No comments. Planning Review Comprehensive Landscape Plan Criteria Comments 20. This needs to be submitted. Planning Review Disclaimer 21. Please be aware that additional comments may be generated at or subsequent to the DRC meeting based upon applicant response to DRC comments. 22. Please review the stated request closely. It is ultimately the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the request and submitted proposal are accurate and consistent with each other. Solid Waste Review How is solid waste service intended be serviced? Stormwater Review 1. Stormwater has no comments for the request for the termination of nonconformity. Comments may occur if upon submittal of a building permit. Traffic Eng Review General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 3/31/2014 27 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda 1:35 PM Case number: FLD2014 -03006 -- 22 BAY ESPLANADE Owner(s): Mathura Properties # 5 Llc 1901 South John Young Pkwy Ste 101 Kissimmee, FL 34741 -0601 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Mathura Properties # 5 LI 1901 South John Young Pkwy Ste 101 Kissimmee, FL 34741 -0601 PHONE: (321) 284 -4631, Fax: No fax, Email: Co math ura @hotmail.Com Representative: James Wilkerson Wilkerson Architects, Llc 119 East Tallulah Drive Greenville, SC 29605 PHONE: (864) 370 -2582, Fax: No fax, Email: Wilkpoe @charter.Net Location: The subject property is located at 22 Bay Esplanade and consists of 0.099acres (4,350 SF). The parcel is located along the north side of Bay Esplanade approximately 95 feet west of Mandalay Avenue and has 50 feet of frontage along Bay Esplanade. Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: Tourist Request: Flexible Development application to permit a restaurant in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 4,350 square feet, a lot width of 50 feet (along Bay Esplanade), a front (south) setback of zero feet (to sidewalk) and 15 feet (to building), a side (west) setback of 10 feet (to building), a side (east) setback of eight feet (to building), a rear (north) setback of 16 feet (to building), a building height of 21.46 feet (to top of flat roof) and 28 feet (to top of parapet) and zero parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 2 -803.0 and a reduction to the foundation landscape requirement on the front (south) facade from five feet to zero feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3- 1202.G Proposed Use: Restaurants Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Melissa Hauck - Baker, Planner II 3/31/2014 28 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Environmental Review Comments 03/20/2014 Josuns Parks and Rec Review No Comments No issues - commericial project less than 1 acre. 03/20/2014 Reid Engineering Review Comments 03/21/2014 Shannon Traffic Eng Review Comments 03/24/2014 Elbo Stormwater Review Comments 03/24/2014 Spearman Planning Review Comments 03/26/2014 Hauck -Baker Land Resource Review Comments 03/26/2014 Anderson Fire Review Comments 03/27/2014 Keller Solid Waste Review Comments 03/31/2014 Pryor We need to look at the possibilty of increasing the storage area to accomodate at least a 2 yard Dumpster. Determination of Completeness Complete 04/03/2014 Baker 3/31/2014 29 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: 1. As per Community Development Code Section 3- 19078, Sidewalks /Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards. 2. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 3. As per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376, Use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited, no person shall use potable water for irrigation through a new or existing lawn meter on property where reclaimed water distribution facilities are available. If potable water is currently used for irrigation, then a connection to the reclaimed water line in Bay Esplanade shall be established. 4. Potable and fire lines shall be separate taps on the water main. General Notes: 1. Only Sheets 3 -5 were reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. 2. Any work in the Bay Esplanade right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be found online at http: // myclearwater. com/ gov/ depts/ pwa /engin /FormsApplications.asp. 3/31/2014 30 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Environmental Review Priorto issuance of Building Permit: 1. Provide erosion control measures on plans sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. 2. The previous building permit complied with sea turtle lighting rules; continue to comply. No light shall be visible or extend in areas identified as Sea Turtle Nesting Areas during the nesting season (May 1 to October 31). Those areas where security and public safety require lighting, alternative light management approaches shall be applied. Provide evidence of sea turtle- friendly lighting in accordance with City code and state laws. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Offsite discharge of produced groundwater from dewatering shall comply with dewatering guidelines from Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), F.A.C. 62- 621(2). 3. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. Fire Review 1) All dumpsters, and any associated screening which consists of combustible fencing around the dumpster pad shall have a minimum separation from the nearest building or building overhang of ten feet (10') ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB 2) Note: This is a D.R.C.approval only. Other issues may develop and will be addressed at building permit stage. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB Land Resource Review Land Resource Review: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. 3/31/2014 31 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Planning Review Planning Review General Site Plan and Application Comments 1. Please provide the estimated total value of the proposed project. 2. The submitted Parking Demand Study was completed four years ago and information needs to be provided regarding the current status of available parking spaces within the adjacent areas. The study identified that within the project primary impact area delineated with a 1,000 foot radius of the subject property that 388 spaces were available through public parking spaces. 3. Please provide the proposed materials and color scheme for the exterior of the building. 4. Please describe how the dumpster enclosure will be consistent with the proposed building. 5. Please provide information regarding access of the site in accordance with the requirements of Americans with Disabilities Act and clarify if an elevator is included as part of the project. 6. Sheet 3 of the plan set provides conflicting information regarding the proposed raised building being built on concrete and /or wood timber pilings, please clarify the proposed construction method. General Applicability Criteria 7. Criterion Four: Please provide specific information regarding the applicability of the previously submitted Parking Demand Study as it relates to accommodating and /or reducing the potential traffic congestion associated with the use. 8. Criterion Five: Please describe how the proposed design of the use is consistent with the community character. 9. Criterion Six: Describe the unique design of the site, specific hours of operation and how the new landscaping will minimize adverse effects of the proposed development. Planning Review Planning Review Flexibility Criteria, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment 10. Criterion One, The application provides that the development is impractical without deviations from the parameters set forth in the zoning district. 11. Criterion Five, Please provide specifics regarding anticipated number of jobs created by proposed development. 12. Criterion Six, While commentary regarding the proposed design of the building has been provided specifics regarding architectural elements being incorporated has not been addressed. Flexibility Criteria: Comprehensive Landscaping Application 13. Criterion One, Proposed landscaping theme to be demonstrably more attractive than basic landscaping required, please elaborate on this issue. 14. Criterion Two, Lighting, The proposed lighting will be approved turtle friendly and will be automatically controlled to ensure that lighting is off when business is closed. 15. Criterion Three, Community Character, Please provide specifics regarding how the proposed landscaping will enhance the community character. 16. Criterion Four, Property Values, Please provide specifics regarding the way in which the proposed landscaping will increase the property values. 17. Criterion Five, Beach by Design for the Old Florida District requires a ten (10) foot landscape buffer be required along the street frontage and the property complies with this requirement. 3/31/2014 32 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Solid Waste Review We need to look at the possibilty of increasing the storage area to accomodate at least a 2 yard Dumpster. Stormwater Review Prior to Building Permit 1. As per Section 3 of the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria, reinforced concrete pipe shall be used in all easements and right of ways. The minimum allowable size is 15 -inch diameter. 2. Please resubmit revised drainage calculations. 3. Please inspect the storm structure on Bay Esplanade to ensure that proposed storm pipe fits into the existing structure. Traffic Eng Review Prior to CDB: 1. Please provide a letter stating the maximum number of DQ employees at one time working at the facility. Mode of travel such as will they all travel using single occupancy vehicles (SOV) or other modes of transportation. General Note(s): 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 3/31/2014 33 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 5:00 PM Case number: ANX2014 -03007 -- 2017 N Betty LN Owner(s): Cox, Dawn Michelle 1278 Palm St Clearwater, FL 33755 -1129 PHONE: (727) 657 -8938, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Location: 0.234 acres generally located south of Union Street, east of Douglas Avenue, north of Sunset Point Road, and west of Kings Highway. Atlas Page: 251 B Zoning District: Request: Proposed annexation of two parcels totaling 0.234 acres into the City of Clearwater, at the request of the property owners; a. Petition to annex at the request of the property owners; b. Future Land Use Map amendment from Residential Urban (RU) Category (Pinellas County) to Residential Urban (RU) Category (City of Clearwater); and c. Zoning Atlas amendment from R -4 One, Two, and Three Family Residential District (Pinellas County), to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District (City of Clearwater). Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Association(s): No Other Homeowners Assocations Presenter: Andrew Hayslip, Planner II 3/31/2014 34 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 03/11/2014 Matzke Engineering Review See condition. Comments 03/17/2014 Shannon Traffic Eng Review No Comments 03/17/2014 Elbo Environmental Review No Comments 03/20/2014 Josuns Parks and Rec Review No issues - annexation of sfr. No Comments 03/20/2014 Reid Fire Review No Comments 03/24/2014 Keller Stormwater Review No Comments 03/25/2014 Johnson Land Resource Review No Comments 03/26/2014 Anderson Solid Waste Review No Comments 03/31/2014 Pryor The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: Engineering Review 1. Annexation into the City of Clearwater will generate monthly stormwater utility fees. 3/31/2014 35 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 5:00 PM Case number: FLS2014 -03004 -- 345 CORONADO DR Owner(s): Mainstream Partners Viii Ltd 10165 N W 19th St Miami, FL 33172 -2529 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: Mainstream Partners Viii 10165 N W 19th St Miami, FL 33172 -2529 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Michael Palmer Synergy Civil Engineering, Incorporated 3000 Gulf To Bay Boulevard Suite 201 Clearwater, FL PHONE: (727) 796 -1926, Fax: No fax, Email: Mpalmer @synergycivileng.Com Location: 0.96 acres located on the northeast corner of Cornado Drive and Fifth Street. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: Tourist Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to allow a parking lot in the Tourist (T) District with a front (south) setback of 15 feet (to pavement), front (east) setback of 15 feet (to pavement), front (west) setback of 24.89 feet (to pavement), side (north) setback of 10 feet (to pavement), an increase in the number of off - street parking spaces in a row from 10 to 16, and 85 off - street parking spaces pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2- 802.N., as well as a reduction to the width of an interior landscape island from eight to five feet, a decrease in the area required for interior landscape islands from 150 to 94 square feet and increase the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 16, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3- 1402.G. Proposed Use: Vacant Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Planner III 3/31/2014 36 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 03/11/2014 Jackson Traffic Eng Review Comments 03/17/2014 Elbo Stormwater Review Comments 03/18/2014 Spearman Parks and Rec Review No Comments 03/20/2014 Reid Environmental Review Comments 03/21/2014 Josuns Land Resource Review Comments 03/24/2014 Crandall Fire Review No Comments 03/24/2014 Keller Planning Review Comments 03/25/2014 Jackson Engineering Review Comments 03/26/2014 Shannon Solid Waste Review No Comments 03/26/2014 Pryor 3/31/2014 37 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Summary of Comments on FLS2014- 03004_Comments172484.pdf Page: 1 — Author: RROWE Subject: Text Box Date: 3/27/2014 3:38:14 PM 1F L.S20114 -0 004 45 ComIrnanndo Il lr'. "v'1laallm AIrc aslnn IIPalrUIrnelr„! VII II, II_. IFIID IFlalr "c 11 113 Author: RROWE Subject: No Comments Date: 3/27/2014 3:40:56 PM Solid Waste - No comments per Mark Beery for Mike Pryor. Mark can be reached at 727 - 5624930 xt 7112. Author: RROWE Subject: No Comments Date: 3/27/2014 3:40:16 PM Per Debbie Reid, no issues - new parking lot. am Author: SJOSUNS Subject: Conditions Date: 3/21/2014 10:18:38 AM ENV - General Notes: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, maybe be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirements to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. am Author: SJOSUNS Subject: Conditions Date: 3/21/2014 10:18:38 AM ENV - Prior to issuance of building permit: Continue to provide erosion control measures on plan sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Conditions Date: 3/24/2014 10:34:23 AM DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/17/2014 3:45:37 PM General Note(s): 1. The proposed project will not incur any Transportation Impact Fee at this time. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 8:25:10 AM Prior to Development Order. Pursuant to CDC3- 1202.E.1, only 15 off - street parking spaces are allowed in one row. As such, remove one parking space and increase the width and area of the interior landscape island. Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 12:29:24 PM Prior to Building Permit: 1. As per Community Development Code Section 3- 1907B, Sidewalks /Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per most recent FDOT Indexes #304 and 310). 2. AS per Clearwater Cade of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water Sysate rn, Section 32.376, Use of (eatable water for irrigation is prohibited, no person shall use (eatable water for irrigation through a new or existing lawn meter on property where reclaimed water distribution facilities are available. If (potable water is Currently used for irrigation, then a Connection to the reclaimed water line in Coronado Drive shall be established. Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 12:29:24 PM General Notes: 1. Only Sheet C -04 was reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. 2. Any work in the Coronado Drive right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be found online at http: / /myclearwater.com /gov/ depts/ pwa /engin /FormsApplications.asp 3. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. am Author: TSPEARMAN Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 3:21:16 PM Prior to Building Permit 1. The stormwater structure shall be designed to have a minimum of 6" vertical clearance between seasonal high water table and the chamber bottom, the entire volume of the chamber shall draw down within 24 hours or less, and shall have at least 6" of freeboard for the 25 -year storm event. 2. Any work done in City R -O -W shall not cause ponding after construction. am Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Conditions Date: 3/24/2014 10:31:21 AM The tree proposed to be retained at the northeast is a norfolk island pine, which is not a desired species and should be removed. This will not contribute to the deficit. The sabal palm in this area, however, should be retained. Revise prior to building permit. Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Conditions Date: 3/24/2014 10:34:23 AM Provide the tree inventory grading the trees and palms on site, or my apologies if it has been submitted, please clarify where in the documents it is. Mayjust revise the Trees to be Removed table to include a rating, prior to building permit. am Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 8:25:10 AM Prior to Development Order. All sight visibility triangles need to be shown at the property line pursuant to CDC Section 3 -904. Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Conditions Date: 3/24/2014 10:34:23 AM Specimen palms are equal to a shade tree and would have a deficit of 2.5 inches if removed. Please revise table. Also accent trees have a deficit of 2 inches if removed (unless the accent being referenced here is the norfolk island pine, then no deficit for it). Revise prior to building permit. 5:00 PM Case number: FLS2014 -03005 -- 405 CORONADO DR Owner(s): Mainstream Partners Viii Ltd 10165 N W 19th St Miami, FL 33172 -2529 PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Applicant: PHONE: No phone, Fax: No fax, Email: No email Representative: Michael Palmer Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Planner III 3/31/2014 38 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Synergy Civil Engineering, Incorporated 3000 Gulf To Bay Boulevard Suite 201 Clearwater, FL 33759 PHONE: (727) 796 -1926, Fax: No fax, Email: Mpalmer @synergycivileng.Com Location: 1.32 acres located at the southeast corner of Coronado Drive and Fifth Street. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: Tourist Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to allow a parking lot in the Tourist (T) District with a front (north) setback of 15 feet (to pavement), front (east) setback of 15 feet (to pavement), front (west) setback of 15 feet (to pavement), side (south) setback of 10 feet (to pavement), an increase in the number of off - street parking spaces in a row from 10 to 13, and 41 off - street parking spaces pursuant to Community Development Code Section 2- 802.N., as well as a reduction to the width of an interior landscape island from eight to 4.35 feet, a decrease in the area required for interior landscape islands from 150 to 76 square feet and increase the number of parking spaces in a row from 10 to 13, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Section 3- 1402.G. Proposed Use: Parking Garages and Lots Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Presenter: Matthew Jackson, Planner III 3/31/2014 38 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" DRC ActionAgenda Workflow: Review Name Task Status Status Date Last Name Determination of Completeness Complete 03/11/2014 Jackson Fire Review No Comments 03/13/2014 Keller Traffic Eng Review Comments 03/14/2014 Elbo Parks and Rec Review No Comments 03/20/2014 Reid Environmental Review Comments 03/21/2014 Josuns Land Resource Review Comments 03/24/2014 Crandall Stormwater Review Comments 03/24/2014 Spearman Planning Review Comments 03/26/2014 Jackson Engineering Review Comments 03/26/2014 Shannon Solid Waste Review No Comments 03/26/2014 Pryor 3/31/2014 39 DRC ActionAgenda "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Summary of Comments on FLS2014-03005_Pre- DRC_Comments172533.pdf Page: 1 Author: RROWE Subject: No Comments Date: 3/28/2014 12:02:07 PM Solid Waste - No comments per Mark Beery for Mike Pryor. Mark can be reached at 727 - 5624930 xt 7112. Author: RROWE Subject: No Comments Date: 3/28/2014 12:01:00 PM No issues, proposed parking lot, per Debbie Reid. am Author: SJOSUNS Subject: Conditions Date: 3/21/2014 10:31:40 AM ENV - General Notes: 1. DRC is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. 2. Additional permits from State agencies, such as the Southwest Florida Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection, may be required. Approval does not relieve the applicant from the requirement to obtain all other required permits and authorizations. am Author: SJOSUNS Subject: Conditions Date: 3/21/2014 10:31:40 AM ENV - Prior to issuance of building permit: Continue to provide erosion control measures on plan sheet and provide notes detailing erosion control methods. Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Conditions Date: 3/24/2014 10:58:01 AM DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, prior to issuance of a building permit any and all performance based erosion and sedimentation control measures must be approved by Environmental and or Stormwater Engineering, be installed properly, and inspected. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 8:45:04 AM Prior to Development Order. As there is not a required number of off - street parking spaces for the development, remove one parking space so the interior landscape island width and area is Code compliant. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 8:45:16 AM Prior to Development Order. Shift the parking spaces north to allow for a Code compliant interior landscape island width and area. Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 8:45:26 AM Prior to Development Order. Shift the parking spaces south to allow for a Code compliant interior landscape island width and area. Author: BELBO Subject: Conditions Date: 3/17/2014 3:51:00 PM General Note(s): 1. The proposed project will not incur any Transportation Impact Fee at this time. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 1:35:20 PM General Notes: 1. Only Sheets C -04 to C -05 were reviewed for General Engineering criteria. The additional details provided in the plan set may have been necessary for other departmental reviews to provide flexible development approval. Construction plans shall be reviewed in more detail prior to receipt of the building permit. 2. Any work in the Coronado Drive right of way will require a city right of way use permit which is permitted through the Engineering Department. Right of way permits can be found online at http: // myclearwater. com /gov/ depts/ pwa /engin /FormsApplications.asp 3. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review. Additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Author: JSHAN NON Subject: ENG -Condition Date: 3/21/2014 1:35:20 PM Prior to Building Permit: 1. As per Community Development Code Section 3- 1907B, Sidewalks /Bicycle paths and City Construction Standard Index No. 109 for Sidewalks, Applicant shall bring all sub - standard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. standards (raised detectable tactile surfaces or truncated domes per most recent FDOT Indexes #304 and 310). 2. If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site - specific water capacity and pressure requirements and /or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 3. As per Clearwater Code of Ordinances, Article IX., Reclaimed Water System, Section 32.376, Use of potable water for irrigation is prohibited, no person shall use potable water for irrigation through a new or existing lawn meter on property where reclaimed water distribution facilities are available. If potable water is currently used for irrigation, then a connection to the reclaimed water line in Coronado Drive shall be established. 4. Please remove reference to City of Tampa on Sheet C -03. am Author: TSPEARMAN Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 3:04:25 PM Prior to Building Permit 1. The stormwater structure shall be designed to have a minimum of 6" vertical clearance between seasonal high water table and the chamber bottom, the entire volume of the chamber shall draw down within 24 hours or less, and shall have at least 6" of freeboard for the 25 -year storm event. 2. A high volume of runoff seems to flow onto Hamden Dr. Please design trench drain at entrance and direct to pond for treatment and attenuation. 3. Finished work at the existing driveway and any areas within the City's r -o -w shall not result in ponding issues. Temporary flooding of the restored area within the r -o -w may be needed for thorough inspection. am Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Conditions Date: 3/24/2014 10:58:01 AM The two palms just at the north of the proposed stormwater pond have already been removed. Submit an after - the -fact tree removal permit. Author: ECRANDALL Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 10:16:10 AM Provide a tree inventory or clarify how and where it has been submitted, or revise the tree to be removed table to include a rating. Please see attached Tree Inventory Grading Sheet. Revise prior to BCP. am Author: MJACKSON Subject: Conditions Date: 3/25/2014 8:37:36 AM Prior to Development Order. Show all sight visibility triangles at the property line pursuant to CDC Section 3 -904.