Loading...
08/20/2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER August 20, 2002 Present: Carlen A. Petersen Chair Ed Hooper Vice Chair David Gildersleeve Board Member – departed 3:15 p.m. Edward Mazur, Jr. Board Member – departed 4:08 p.m. Shirley Moran Board Member Alex Plisko Board Member John Doran Board Member Kathy Milam Alternate Board Member Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director Lisa Fierce Assistant Planing Director Gina Clayton Long Range Planning Manager Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: July 23, 2002 Member Moran moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of July 23, 2002, motion as submitted in written summation to each board member. The was duly seconded and carried unanimously. (Alternate Board Member Milam did not vote.) B. CONTINUE ITEMS: (Items 1 - 3) 1. Case: FLD2002-05014 – 1370 Gulf Boulevard Continued from July 23, 2002 Owner: The Renaissance on Sand Key, Inc. Applicant: Dalton East, LLC. Representative: Todd Pressman. Location: 1.765 acres located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard, approximately one mile south of the Clearwater Pass bridge. This includes 1.045 acres of HDR and 0.72 acres of OS/R. Atlas Page: 303B. Zoning: HDR, High Density Residential District and OS/R, Open Space and Recreation District. Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of a proposed building from 30 feet to 80 feet, reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and reduce the required front (east) setback along Gulf Boulevard from 25 feet to 20 feet (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-504.A, with a Comprehensive Landscape Program. Proposed Use: A 31-unit attached dwelling development within an 80-foot building. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. mcd0802 1 08/20/02 The rectangular site is a total 1.765 acres, of which 1.045 acres is zoned HDR, High Density Residential District and 0.72 acres is zoned OSR, Open Space/Recreation District. The site is located approximately one mile south of the Clearwater Pass bridge on the west side of Gulf Boulevard. It is currently vacant with asphalt remnants form the previous Gallery Restaurant, demolished in 2000. There is an additional vacant lot adjacent to the north at 1350 Gulf Boulevard, which is not part of this request. The proposal is for the construction of 31 attached dwelling units within a single building. The project will have ground level parking with eight floors of dwelling units above. Floors two through eight will have four units each, while the ninth floor will contain three penthouse units. The second floor will include an open-air tennis court on the east side of the building. The tennis court will be enclosed with a 3.5 feet high balustrade and a ten feet high, columned, open arched wall infilled with black vinyl coated chain link fencing to catch errant tennis balls. Planters at the base of these chain link fence areas will be planted with confederate jasmine that will grow onto the fence to form a landscape screen for the tennis court. A pool is proposed on the ground floor on the west side of the building, respecting the Building Code setback requirement of 18 feet from the seawall. The proposal is for an 80-foot high building with units oriented toward the Gulf of Mexico. This height, as an increase from 30-feet per Code, requires Flexible Development approval. The size, scale and bulk of this proposed building is smaller than similar projects on the west side of Gulf Boulevard. The Sand Key Club, adjacent to the south, is approximately 130 feet in height with units oriented facing north and south. The Crescent Beach Club, to the north of the vacant lot on the north side of this project, is approximately 180 feet in height with units oriented toward the Gulf of Mexico. The building location for this proposal is designed to be centered on the site. It is approximately 60 feet from the neighboring Sand Key Club. The building is designed with a Mediterranean flavor with colors including shades of taupe and white and a blue barrel tile roof. The building will have balconies on both the east and west sides. The proposed building will be in harmony with the character of surrounding properties. An access driveway is proposed along Gulf Boulevard on the north side of the property. The proposed parking areas, both in front of and under the building, adjoin a drive on the adjacent Sand Key Club as provided through an existing ingress/egress easement. A portion of a vehicle turn-around area is proposed on the south side of the site, completing the unfinished portion with the Sand Key Club. This requires a side setback reduction from 10 feet to zero feet. A reciprocal ingress/egress easement for this vehicle turn-around will need to be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The existing drive on the Sand Key Club property will serve as a fire lane for both sites. It will need to be posted as such prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. A drive connection between the two properties near Gulf Boulevard provides an area for truck access for deliveries and trash pickup. A reduction of the front setback from 25 feet to 20 feet to pavement is requested which is consistent with the established character of Gulf Boulevard. While most parking spaces will be under the building, there are open-air parking spaces on the east side of the site. Off-street parking will be screened from adjacent parcels and Gulf Boulevard by landscaping planted at four feet in height. The parking areas will need to be enhanced with a four-foot high wall or fence adjacent to the pavement (inside the landscaping) to meet Code requirements. Landscaping will exceed Code requirements and will be consistent and provide continuity with installations on adjacent properties. mcd0802 2 08/20/02 A 10-foot wide public access easement is located along the north side of the property. It will be improved with a five-foot sidewalk, from Gulf Boulevard to the beach, for pedestrian access. This easement will be landscaped with sea grapes and palms. As a public access easement, landscaping within this easement will need to be removed, trimmed or modified when requested by the City. A document to this effect will need to be recorded, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney’s office. A chute system will be used for solid waste management. Roll-out containers will be moved to a dumpster at the southeast corner of the property. A six-foot high enclosure will screen it and will match the architecture of the building. A six-foot high monument sign is proposed along Gulf Boulevard at the north side of the access driveway. The monument sign will be coordinated/consistent with the architecture and color of the building. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on June 13, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development application to increase the height of a proposed building from 30 feet to 80 feet, reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and reduce the required front (east) setback along Gulf Boulevard from 25 feet to 20 feet (to pavement) within the HDR, High Density Residential District, under the provisions of Section 2-504.A, for the site at 1370 Gulf Boulevard, with Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with Flexible Development criteria under the provisions of Section 2-504; 2) The project complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3) The project is compatible with properties within the surrounding area; and Conditions for Approval: 1) That a reciprocal ingress/egress easement for the partial vehicle turn around on this property be recorded with Pinellas County and the adjacent drive on the Sand Key Club property be posted as a no parking fire lane, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 2) That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or as modified by the CDB; 3) That a four- foot high wall or fence be provided along parking areas to meet landscape screening requirements; 4) That the Recreation Land and Recreation Facility dedication requirement be satisfied, prior to the issuance of building permits; 5) That the monument sign be limited six feet in height and be coordinated/consistent with the architecture and color of the building.; 6) That the landscaping within the public access easement along the north side be removed, trimmed or modified at the applicant’s expense if requested by the City; and 7) The applicant shall record a document, approved by the City Attorney, to this effect, prior to the issuance of any permits. Concern was expressed a number of residents had wasted their time by attending July’s meeting, when a lack of quorum caused this item to be continued. Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani said the City Commission had not supported appointing a second alternate board member. Due to conflicts, the July meeting date had been rescheduled. The new date also posed conflict. It was noted the problem had not occurred previously. Ms. Tarapani said staff would have contacted interested parties regarding the lack of quorum had they been aware of the problem earlier. She requested board members carefully review next year’s schedule for conflicts. In response to a question, Senior Planner Wayne Wells stated the requested setbacks are to the pavement only. In response to a comment, Assistant Planning Director Lisa Fierce said restaurants are not permitted in HDR zoning. In response to a question, Mr. Wells said the structure will be 60 feet from the Sand Key Club. mcd0802 3 08/20/02 Todd Pressman, representative, said based on input from nearby residents, many changes had occurred to the development’s design and architecture. The developer has worked closely with the community through a series of meetings. Notice was sent to 464 separate owners of 524 parcels. He reviewed the size of nearby buildings, noting this development will be only 80 feet high. Historically, residents of the abutting Sand Key Club have used a portion of the subject property for a turn around. The developer is donating an easement to the Sand Key Club so this practice can continue. He said the percentage of impervious surface proposed is greater than required by Code. Due to neighbor concerns regarding loss of privacy, Mr. Pressman said the side of the building was designed with small windows high in the units. He said the landscape plan exceeds Code requirements. In response to a question, Mr. Pressman said the setback to the south is solely to retain the cul de sac, enjoyed by Sand Key Club residents. In response to a question, Mr. Pressman said along the road, the tennis court will be fenced with a black chain link vinyl coated barrier. Six residents spoke in support of the project. One resident spoke in opposition to the project. Mr. Pressman said the developer had been proactive in contacting all residents regarding this project. Concern was expressed the majority of Sand Key residents are not present in the summer. Mr. Pressman was commended for working closely with residents. Member Doran moved to approve Item B1, with conditions as listed, Case FLD2002- motion carried 05014. The was duly seconded and unanimously. (Alternate Board Member Milam voted.) C. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owner, etc. and will be approved by single vote at the beginning of the meeting. (Items 1 - 4) 1. Case: DA 01-01-01 – 301 South Gulfview Boulevard Continued from July 23, 2002 Owners: Clearwater Seashell Resort, LC, Al-Nayem International Incorporated and the City of Clearwater. Applicant: Clearwater Seashell Resort, LC. Representative: William J. Kimpton and Richard Gehring. Location: 1.63-acres located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard, west of Coronado Avenue, approximately 400 feet south of First Street. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Requests: Review of, and recommendation to the City Commission on, proposed amendments to the development agreement between Clearwater Seashell Resort LC and the City of Clearwater, which provide for the interim use of the property as a public parking lot, provide lease terms and adds a provision requiring the City to buy the property under certain conditions. Proposed Use: A 250-room hotel with ancillary restaurant/retail sales and service uses and a 750-space parking garage and the interim use of the site with a 155-space parking lot to be managed and operated by the City. mcd0802 4 08/20/02 Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. The rectangular, 1.63-acre site is located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 400 feet south of First Street. The area is intensely developed with predominantly commercial uses including restaurants, motels, hotels and retail sales and service. Single-family dwellings exist to the east and a City-owned parking lot is located across Gulfview Boulevard to the west. The area along South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive is characterized by older, modest hotels and motels and retail businesses within mid-rise buildings. The site is located within the Beach Walk District of the Beach by Design Plan. The site consists of two properties that have been developed with overnight accommodations (Glass House Motel and Beach Place Motel at 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard, respectively). The motel buildings were built between 1941 and 1956 and contain a total of 65 rooms. All existing structures will be razed as part of the redevelopment of the site as a 250-room, full-service resort hotel with 750-space parking garage. Within the garage, 400 spaces are to be available to the public. Ten feet of right-of-way along Coronado Drive will be dedicated as part of the approved site plan. The plan includes a portion of the eastern half of the South Gulfview Boulevard right- of-way and Third Street right-of-way between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive. Third Street, a 60-foot wide right-of-way, bifurcates the site from east to west. Both portions of the rights-of-way were conditionally vacated by the City Commission in May 2001. The proposal includes the implementation of the beach walk improvements as outlined in Beach by Design. South Gulfview Boulevard will be relocated farther west as part of a serpentine, beach walk design. Its new configuration will include a two-way, two-lane road section and pedestrian way and bicycle path. At its February 20, 2001 meeting, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development application (FL 01-01-01) for a resort hotel and parking garage for this site. Of the 500 available units in the Beach by Design density pool, 185 were granted for use as part of that application. The Board also recommended approval of a Development Agreement (DA 01-01-01) that was subsequently approved by the City Commission on March 1, 2001. A time extension request for the Flexible Development (site plan) application was approved by the CDB on February 20, 2002. It will expire on February 20, 2003. To preserve the development of the site plan, a code amendment will be necessary to provide for a second time extension. An amendment to Beach by Design may be necessary, should the hotel pool units for this project not be used by March 2006. The pool expires in June 2006. The proposal also includes a companion request of a Flexible Development application for a 155-space, public parking lot as an interim use. (Refer to companion case FLD 02-04-12.) The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on May 16, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the amendment to the Development Agreement for the site at 301 South Gulfview Boulevard, with the following Bases for approval: 1) The proposal furthers the goals established in special area plan governing the beach, Beach by Design, including the elimination of modest hotels on the beach and creating a more attractive place for residents and visitors and 2) The proposed interim use provides desired parking near the beach and enhances the viability of the resort community. mcd0802 5 08/20/02 AND 2. Case: FLD 02-04-12 – 301 South Gulfview Boulevard Continued from July 23, 2002 Owners: Clearwater Seashell Resort, LC, Al-Nayem International Incorporated and the City of Clearwater. Applicant: Clearwater Seashell Resort, LC. Representative: Christine Papandreas, King Engineering. Location: 1.40-acres located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard, west of Coronado Avenue, approximately 400 feet south of First Street. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development application approval to permit a parking lot within the Tourist District and to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement), reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement) and to reduce the front (east) setback along Coronado Avenue from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803. Proposed Use: A 155-space parking lot, as part of an interim use of the site, to be managed and operated by the City. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. History At its February 20, 2001 meeting, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development application (site plan) for a resort hotel and parking garage for the subject site (FL 01-01-01). Of the 500 available hotel units in the Beach by Design density pool, 185 were granted for use as part of that application. The Board also recommended approval of a Development Agreement (DA 01-01-01) that was subsequently approved by the City Commission on March 1, 2001. A request to vacate Third Street (from Coronado Drive to South Gulfview Boulevard) and part of South Gulfview Boulevard was approved by the Commission on May 3, 2001, subject to six conditions. A time extension request for the Flexible Development (site plan) application was approved by the CDB on February 20, 2002. It will expire on February 20, 2003. To preserve the development of the site plan, a code amendment will be necessary to provide for a second time extension. An amendment to Beach By Design may be necessary, should the hotel pool units for this project (185 rooms) not be used by March, 2006. The pool expires in June, 2006. The Development Agreement requires the applicant to construct a minimum 250-room hotel and 750-space parking garage with 400 public spaces. The applicant will provide “upfront” financing for the Beachwalk project and relocated South Gulfview Boulevard, generally between the south beach concession structure and First Street. The agreement requires the City to process the vacation requests of both Third Street and South Gulfview Boulevard, provide units from the resort units bonus pool, and reimburse the applicant for public improvements from the additional ad valorem revenue and other public revenues generated by the project beyond the existing revenue levels. This application also includes a companion request of, and recommendation to the City Commission on, an amendment to the Development Agreement. The major changes proposed mcd0802 6 08/20/02 include: a time extension for the hotel project, use of the site as an interim parking lot, construction period terms for the interim lot, lease terms for the use of the parking lot, a purchase obligation, and consideration of an extension of the resort room density pool. (Refer to companion case DA 01-01-01, as amended.) The site is 1.4 acres located on the east side of South Gulfview Boulevard, west of Coronado Avenue, approximately 400 feet south of First Street. The area is intensely developed with predominantly commercial uses including restaurants, motels, hotels and retail sales and service uses. Single-family dwellings exist to the east and a City-owned parking lot is located across Gulfview Boulevard to the west. Older, modest hotels and motels and retail businesses within mid-rise buildings characterize the area along South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive. The site contains two properties developed with overnight accommodations (Glass House Motel and Beach Place Motel at 229 and 301 South Gulfview Boulevard, respectively). The motel buildings were built between 1941 and 1956 and contain a total of 65 rooms and one dwelling unit. All existing structures will be razed as part of the redevelopment of the site. The site also includes a portion of the Third Street right-of-way between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive. This section, along with a portion of the eastern half of the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way, was conditionally vacated by the City Commission in May 2001. The site plan under discussion in this report does not include the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of- way. The site is located within the Beach Walk District of the Beach by Design Plan. The ultimate, approved plan is for a 250-room, full-service, upscale hotel with banquet facilities, restaurants, and retail uses. A 750-space parking garage will be built under the hotel and 400 spaces will be available to the public. The proposal includes the dedication of 10 feet of right-of- way along Coronado Drive and the implementation of the beach walk improvements as outlined in Beach by Design. South Gulfview Boulevard will be ultimately relocated farther west as part of a serpentine design. Its new configuration will include a two-way, two-lane road section and pedestrian way and bicycle path. The design will eliminate the existing public parking lots on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard. Construction of the hotel has yet to commence, because of unexpected litigation and a negative economic climate (due in part to acts of terrorism). At its July 18, 2002 meeting, the Commission directed Staff to proceed with discussions with the applicant on the interim use of the site subject to modification of the Development Agreement. Interim Redevelopment Proposal The proposal includes the creation of a 155-space, public parking lot as an interim use. The request is to permit a parking lot within the Tourist District and to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement), reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement) and to reduce the front (east) setback along Coronado Avenue from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The reductions in setback will provide for a maximum number of parking spaces on the property. The reductions in setbacks and related landscaping is considered appropriate only due to the temporary nature of the parking lot. mcd0802 7 08/20/02 The site plan includes a single vehicle entrance/exit along Coronado Avenue. The parking lot driveway will align with Third Street east of Coronado Avenue. A 10-foot wide pedestrian walkway will be provided, running east/west, bisecting the site. It will be painted a terracotta color as a means of visually separating vehicles and pedestrians. Pay stations will be located along the pedestrian walkway; a gated ticket booth will not be required. The lot will be enclosed by a 3.5 to four foot high, white, picket fence (except at two pedestrian and vehicle entrances/exits). This will reduce cut-through behavior and encourage patrons to use the pay stations. The fence along South Gulfview Boulevard should be located adjacent to the parking spaces. The length of parking spaces required by Code is 19 feet (for lots designed with a 90- degree angle). Typically, wheel stops are provided with a proper overhang space for the front end of the vehicle. Wheel stops, however, are not used in this area of the beach because it is difficult to efficiently remove sand from the parking lots. To provide for ease of maintenance, the spaces in this lot will be 17 feet long and a continuous curb will be installed in lieu of, and in the same location as, individual wheel stops. The spaces will function like the standard-sized spaces. Drive aisles are 24 feet wide to provide two-way circulation. Six handicap parking spaces are provided along the western half of the site, adjacent to the pedestrian walkway. Light poles, trash receptacles, benches and pay stations will be provided by the applicant. Lighting must meet Code requirements to avoid impacting sea turtle nesting areas. The placement and design of these features will be subject to approval by the Parking System Division of the Public Works Administration. A five-foot sidewalk will be provided along the entire frontage of Coronado Avenue and along a portion of South Gulfview Boulevard (where no sidewalk currently exists). Directional signs will be sited in various locations of the lot to guide the patrons to the pay stations. Identification signs will be provided along both streets and comply with Code. Signs will be provided by the City. The lot will be open daily from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The parking lot will include a stormwater facility (swale) to accommodate 1.5-inch of retention, as required by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). It will be located along the front (west) property line along South Gulfview Boulevard. Landscaping will be provided along the South Gulfview Boulevard frontage in association with the swale, within the interior islands and along a portion of the Coronado Avenue frontage. The plan includes the use of ground covers, shrubs and palms. The landscape plan needs to be amended to include the relocation of the fence, use of jasmine in lieu of sod within the swale, replacement of oleander with beach sunflower adjacent to the spaces along South Gulfview Boulevard and relocation of palms throughout the site to align with parking stall striping. These changes will better screen the lot from adjacent streets, provide for adequate vehicle overhang, and create a more attractive appearance. A note should be added to the plan requiring landscape areas to have 100 percent coverage from a fully automatic, drip irrigation system with rain sensor and automatic shutoff. Part of the submittal includes a future phase two adding 24 parking spaces within the portion of South Gulfview Boulevard that is slated for vacation as part of the ultimate redevelopment of the site as a hotel. The Development Agreement under consideration, however, does not address phase two as part of the interim project use or in the lease terms. The stormwater management for the site, as designed, does not include phase two and does not address the concerns and requirements of SWFWMD. The timing of the Beach Walk improvements and the availability of the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way is not finalized mcd0802 8 08/20/02 and is subject to many unknown variables (including design, funding and construction schedule). Accordingly, phase two references need to be eliminated as part of a revised site plan. Any additions to the interim lot would need to be submitted as part of another site plan application and Development Agreement amendment when there is more certainty on the capital project and a realistic schedule has been established. The site may be used for an interim period (until March 2006), until a resort hotel is built. The parking lot will be fully constructed by the applicant and leased to the City for operation and maintenance. The lot must be built within 12 months of Development Agreement (amended) and site plan approval. The lease agreement is contained within the Development Agreement. The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on May 16, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a parking lot within the Tourist District and to reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement), reduce the side (south) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement) and to reduce the front (east) setback along Coronado Avenue from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803., for the site at 301 South Gulfview Boulevard, with the following Bases for approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2- 803.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3) The proposal furthers the goals established in special area plan governing the beach, Beach by Design, including the elimination of modest hotels on the beach and creating a more attractive place for residents and visitors; 4) The proposed interim use provides desired parking near the beach and enhances the viability of the resort community; and 5) The flexibility in site design is warranted due to the temporary nature of the parking lot; and Conditions of Approval: 1) That this application be effective upon (amended) Development Agreement approval by the City Commission; 2) That the site plan, as amended, be resubmitted without any reference to phase two (parking spaces within future vacated South Gulfview Boulevard), prior to the issuance of any permits; 3) That a revised site plan be submitted to and approved by Staff, and include: corrected parking space counts and dimensions, additional bollards at the east and west openings of the pedestrian walkway, fence details and relocation along South Gulfview Boulevard to the east side of the drainage swale, and a note indicating that lighting will meet Code and light fixtures, pay station and trash receptacle locations will be properly located to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits; 4) That a revised landscape plan be submitted to and approved by Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits, including: the relocation of the fence along South Gulfview Boulevard to the east side of the swale, use of jasmine in lieu of sod within the swale, replacement of oleander with beach sunflower adjacent to the spaces along South Gulfview Boulevard, relocation of palms throughout the site to align with parking stall striping, and the addition of a note requiring landscape areas to have 100 percent coverage from a fully automatic, drip irrigation system with rain sensor and automatic shutoff; and 5) That all signage meet Code. Member Hooper moved to recommend approval of Items C1 and C2, with conditions as motion carried listed, Cases DA 01-01-01 and FLD 02-04-12. The was duly seconded and unanimously. (Alternate Board Member Milam did not vote.) mcd0802 9 08/20/02 3. Case: FLD 02-04-11 – 915 and 915 ½ Turner Street Owner/Applicant: Ms. Jennifer Carpenter. Representative: Mr. Gilbert Jannelli. Location: 0.20-acres located on the south side of Turner Street, approximately 400 feet west of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue (formally South Greenwood Avenue). Atlas Page: 296 A. Zoning: MDR, Medium Density Residential District. Request: Termination of the status of a nonconforming use (three attached dwellings where one dwelling unit is permitted) within the Medium Density Residential District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C, and Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (east) setback from five feet to four feet (to pavement) and reduce the side (west) setback from five feet to three feet (to pavement), as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304, and a Comprehensive Landscape Program to reduce required side buffers from 10 feet to zero feet under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Three dwelling units within two existing structures and a new five-space parking lot. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. The site is 0.20 acres located on the south side of Turner Street, approximately 400 feet west of Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue South (formally South Greenwood Avenue). It is located within a neighborhood undergoing early redevelopment; it consists of a historic mix of single- and multi-family dwellings located on similarly-sized properties. The site, developed 80 years ago with the two existing buildings, currently contains three dwelling units. A 1,253 square foot, one-story building (Building A) contains a single dwelling unit and is located on the north side of the site. A 1,635 square foot, two-story building (Building B) is located on the south portion of the site and contains two dwelling units. The site has contained the three dwelling units since at least 1920, according to a notarized statement from the County Property Appraiser’s office. The site is accessed from Turner Street via a single, driveway consisting to two strips of poorly maintained, interlocking bricks. Solid wood fences exist along the side (east and west) and rear (south) property lines. Trees and shrub material exist along the side (east) and rear (south) property line. The site is the subject of a current Code violation (COD2000-02411) involving interior renovations to both buildings without permits. The renovations were required in order to make the structures habitable. The value of required renovations, required to bring them into compliance with Code, will exceed 50 percent of the value of the buildings. The Code requires, under the provisions of Section 6-103.E., that, in the event a structure in which a nonconforming use is located is destroyed or damaged to 50 percent or more of the assessed value, the structure may be repaired or restored only if the structure and the use conforms to the standards of the development code for the zoning district in which it is located. The existing structures are nonconforming with regard to density and rear (south) setback. The underlying land use designation of Residential Urban Category permits a maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre for the subject site or one dwelling unit (density is rounded to the lowest whole number). The only option available to the applicant to redevelop the site and maintain the current number of dwelling units is to request a Residential Infill Project and a termination of status as a nonconformity use. mcd0802 10 08/20/02 A Comprehensive Landscape Program is requested, due to narrow width of the property and location of existing buildings. While the required perimeter buffer width of ten feet cannot be met, the intent of Code is satisfied by existing and proposed plantings and existing six-foot high, wood fencing. Landscape buffers four and three in width along the east and west property lines, respectively, will be provided. Building A is located 40 feet from the front (north) setback along Turner Street, 14 feet from the side (west) property line and eight feet from the side (east) property line. Building B is less than one foot from the rear (south) property line, 10 feet from the side (west) property line and 17 feet from the side (east) property line and a minimum of 50 feet from any other property line. Changes proposed for the site include four new parking spaces (in addition to single existing parking space) to be located along the east property line. The new driveway will be eight feet in width and will be constructed of interlocking pavers/bricks. Improvements to the structures include significant rehabilitation of both buildings to include new windows, doors, siding, roofs, central air-conditioning and heating and landscaping. The front and back porches of Building A will be rebuilt. The structures will be painted off-white with sky-blue trim. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on May 16 and July 11, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval for a Termination of the status of a nonconforming use (three attached dwellings where one dwelling unit is permitted) within the Medium Density Residential District under the provisions of Section 6-109.C, and Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (east) setback from five feet to four feet (to pavement) and reduce the side (west) setback from five feet to three feet (to pavement), as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304 and a Comprehensive Landscape Program to reduce required side buffers from 10 feet to zero feet under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. for the site at 915 and 915 1/2 Turner Street, with the following Basis for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria to terminate the status of a nonconforming use per Section 6-109.C; 2) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; 3) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 4) The development is compatible with and will enhance the surrounding area and Condition for Approval: 1) That the site be completely rehabilitated to address the pending Code violation (COD2000-02411) within six months (February 20, 2003) of approval of this application, to the satisfaction of Staff. It was questioned why the renovations had been started without a permit. Gilbert Jannelli, representative, stated a permit for demolition had been pulled and that no work had been done that was not allowed by that permit. He said the front building is not being renovated. Ms. Fierce said the Building Official had cited the property for performing renovations without permit. Mr. Jannelli said no further renovations were done until this issue is resolved. He said the workers had torn out existing problems but had not installed electrical items. Concern was expressed citizens need to be educated regarding when permits are required. Planner Mark T. Parry said the request is to allow 3 units to remain onsite. The building is currently unsafe. Adequate parking needs to be added and permits need to be pulled for necessary rehabilitation work. In response to a question, Mr. Parry said the area predominantly consists of multi-family homes with two to six units. This action will terminate the property’s non-conformity status. All required building permits will be required before on-site work can continue. mcd0802 11 08/20/02 Member Mazur moved to approve Item C1, with the listed condition, Case FLD 02-04- motion 11. The was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve, Mazur, Moran, Hooper, Doran, carried and Chair Petersen voted “Aye’; Member Plisko voted “Nay.” Motion . 4. Case: APP2002-07002 – 193 Devon Drive Owner: Christopher C. Mariani. Applicant/Appellant: Deborah L. Groen Soboleski. (191 Devon Drive). Location: 0.19 acres located on the south side of Devon Drive, approximately 600 feet east of Hamden Drive Atlas Page: 276A. Proposed Use: A 440 square foot dock with two boat lifts. Request: Appeal of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) decision by the Community Development Coordinator who approved certain deviations to dock requirements for the property located at 193 Devon Drive, under the appeal provisions of Section 4-501 of the Community Development Code. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. This 0.32-acre site is located on the south side and terminus of Devon Drive, approximately 1,350 feet east of Hamden Drive. The site fronts on a channel off of Clearwater Harbor and is currently vacant. On January 18, 2002, Timothy Johnson, Jr., Esquire, filed an application for Flexible Standard Development approval on behalf of Mr. Christopher C. Mariani (property owner) for a dock. It was later amended and refiled on January 28, 2002. (Refer to Exhibit A.) This application requested an increase in the permitted length of a dock from 60 feet to 101 feet, due to the proximity of sea grasses. Following the DRC meeting of February 14, 2002, the applicant submitted a second amendment to the application. The March 5, 2002 submittal included a letter stating the overall length of dock would be 95 feet (refer to Exhibit B.) An April 14, 2002 letter and accompanying site plan included a 92-foot long dock (refer to Exhibit C). Section 3-601.C.1.b of the Code provides that the length of docks and boatlifts that serve a single-family dwelling shall not exceed 25 percent of the waterway or half of the width of the property measured at the waterfront property line, whichever is less. In this case, the lot is 120 feet wide at the east, waterfront property line and the waterway is approximately 700 feet wide. In this case, half of the lot width is used to determine permitted length of the dock and is 60 feet. The proposed dock was shown 128 feet from the extended east property line and 44 feet from the extended west property line. The boatlift location was shown 30 feet from the west property line. Section 3-601.C.1.g of the Code provides for deviations from dock requirements for single-family (and two-family) dwellings. The Community Development Coordinator may grant deviations as part of a Level One, Minimum Standard review, provided signed and notarized statements of no objection are secured from both adjacent waterfront property owners. In the event such statements cannot be obtained, deviations are reviewed under Flexible Standard Development applications, based on one of the following criteria: 1) That the proposed dock will result in no navigational conflicts and the length of the proposed dock will not exceed 25 percent of the width of the waterway; or 2) The proposed dock location needs to be adjusted to protect mcd0802 12 08/20/02 environmentally sensitive areas; or 3) The property configuration precludes the placement of a dock in compliance with the required dimensional standards; however, the proposed dock will be similar in dimensional characteristics as surrounding dock patterns. The applicant was not able to provide statement of no objection from both adjacent waterfront property owners and applied as part of a Level One, Flexible Standard Development review. Consent was provided from the adjacent property owner to the east (“left”), at 195 Devon Drive, within the application submittal (Exhibit A). As part of his submission, the applicant provided documentation from the Pinellas County Department of Environmental Management stating that there are no navigational concerns associated with the proposed dock. It was also stated that the proposed structure is more environmentally sensitive than the existing structure, reducing negative environmental impacts to existing sea grasses. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application on February 14, 2002. There were no objections raised by the DRC whose members include the Environmental Manager of the Public Works Administration and Harbormaster. The application was approved by the Community Development Coordinator (Planning Director) through its designee (Assistant Planning Director) on July 22, 2002 (refer to attached Staff Report and Development Order for case FLS 02-01-03, Exhibits D and E). It should be noted that the Community Development Coordinator supervised the review of this application and the decision made, as is done with all cases. During the Coordinator’s absence from the office, the Assistant Planning Director was designated to act on behalf of the Planning Director on all matters, including the issuance of the Development Order. The application was approved with the following Bases for approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 601.C.g; 2) The proposal, as amended, is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development, as amended, is compatible with the surrounding area; and Conditions of approval: 1) That a building permit for the proposed dock only be issued concurrently with, or subsequent to, building permit issuance for a principal, residential structure on the site; 2) That the proposed dock be relocated farther east (with the dock head centered on the midpoint of the waterfront property line, as measured at the seawall) and constructed perpendicular to the waterfront property line; 3) That the relocation of the dock meet all criteria under Section 3-601.C.1; and 4) That revised plans reflecting conformance with condition #2 be submitted with the building permit application, to the satisfaction of staff. Member Plisko declared a conflict of interest. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said the appellant has requested this item be removed from the Consent Agenda and scheduled for a quasi-judicial hearing. Maxwell Battle Jr., representative for the appellant, said the entire packet presented to the Planning Department for distribution to the Community Development Board is part of the appeal. He said based on public policy, the CDB should hear the appeal. He said the Assistant Planning Director had erred when approving the dock. Discussion ensued regarding staff’s decision and the requirement to center the dock on the applicant’s property. Ed Armstrong, representative for the applicant, said approval of the applicant’s request required it to meet one of three grounds of approval. He said the request meets at least two mcd0802 13 08/20/02 issues. He said no evidence was presented that staff had misinterpreted the Code or that the decision was detrimental to health and safety issues. He said the length of the proposed dock is justified by Pinellas County sea grass requirements. Mr. Battle requested the decision to pull the item not be based on the likelihood of an outcome. In response to a question, Ms. Dougall-Sides said the Code does not establish a standard for pulling items from the Consent Agenda. She said the board would need a reason to pull it off the Consent Agenda. She said the appellant had not addressed how staff had misconstrued the Code. If the CDB does not hear the case, the appellant can appeal to a Hearing Officer. Ms. Tarapani said staff performed a complete review of the issue and considered all submissions. She said staff had acted appropriately and had provided an opportunity for all to participate. She said the issue is a balance between the applicant’s property rights with rights of nearby residents. Photographs submitted by the appellant are based on a different location for the dock. The applicant has not submitted a revised plan yet, to show conformance with one of the conditions of approval. Mr. Armstrong said the applicant accepts all conditions recommended by staff. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said the site plan is complete as submitted at this point in the process. The applicant will need to submit engineering drawings before construction can begin. Mr. Battle said the appellant is disadvantaged when the dock plans are changed and cannot determine how the change will affect vistas. Ms. Tarapani said Mr. Battle had been asked to make an alternate recommendation. The applicant did not accept the suggestion to locate the dock on the east end of the property. Mr. Battle said his entire submission should be distributed to each CDB member. In response to a question, Mr. Battle said the dock should be located as far east on the property as possible to protect his client’s vista. It was noted if residents adhered to Mr. Battle’s recommendation related to site lines, no docks would be permitted on Devon Drive. Deborah L. Groen Soboleski, appellant, requested the item be pulled from the Consent Agenda so the board could hear what she has to say. Ms. Tarapani said the proposed dock complies with the code. It will not shade grass beds. It is shorter than adjacent docks, and almost equal to the second of the appellant’s two docks. The requested dock is not out of character with the neighborhood. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said one of the conditions of approval she imposed as part of the approval clearly indicates the dock must be constructed at the center of the property. There was no motion to remove Item C4 from the Consent Agenda. Member Hooper moved to approve the Consent Agenda related to Item C4, Case motion carried APP2002-07002. The was duly seconded and unanimously. Member Plisko abstained. Alternate Board Member Milam voted. The Board confirmed the decision of the Community Development Coordinator. The CDB recessed from 3:45 to 3:56 p.m. mcd0802 14 08/20/02 D. LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS: (Items 1 - 2) 1. Case: ANX2002-05007 – 721 & 723 South Bayview Avenue; 3018 & 3024 Penmar Drive; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths Bay View Subdivision Owner/Applicant: Our Lady of Divine Providence, House of Prayer, Inc. Representative: Harry S. Cline, Esquire. Location: Five parcels, totaling approximately one acre, located on the east side of South Bayview Drive and on the north and south sides of Penmar Drive, north of Old Tampa Bay. Atlas Page: 301A. Request: Annexation of five vacant parcels of land into the City of Clearwater to be included as part of a pending land use plan amendment and rezoning case (LUZ2002-05006). Proposed Use: Place of worship. Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner. This annexation involves five (5) vacant parcels of land located on the east side of South Bayview Avenue and on the north and south sides of Penmar Drive, north of Old Tampa Bay. Combined, these vacant properties are approximately 57,499 square feet or 1.32 acres. The properties are contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the north, south, east and west; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. A companion application to change the Future Land Use Plan category of this site from Residential Low (RL) to Institutional (I), and to rezone it from One, Two & Three Family Residential (R-4) to Institutional (I) is being processed concurrently with this annexation request in LUZ 2002-05006 (see agenda item D-2). Staff recommends approval. Three people opposed the request. In response to a question, Ms. Dougall-Sides said placement of the on-site sign meets Code. While the Bayview Homeowners Association may not have been noticed formally, Ms. Dougall-Sides stated the association was aware of today’s meeting as evidenced by the presence today of association members. She opined notice requirements had been met. According to the City Clerk mailing list, notices were mailed to all residents, even those who claimed otherwise. Member Moran moved to recommend approval of Item D1, Case ANX2002-05007. The motion carried was duly seconded and unanimously. (Alternate Board Member Milam voted.) 2. Case: LUZ2002-05006 – 717, 719, 721, 723 & 725 South Bayview Avenue; 3018 & 3024 Penmar Drive; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths Bay View Subdivision Owner/Applicant: Our Lady of Divine Providence, House of Prayer, Inc. Representative: Harry S. Cline, Esquire. Location: 3.08 acres located on the east side of South Bayview Drive and on the north and south sides of Penmar Drive, north of Old Tampa Bay. Atlas Page: 301A. Request: Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to I, Institutional (City)(pending ANX2002-05007); and Rezoning from R4, One, Two & Three Family Residential (County) and LDR, Low Density Residential (City) to I, Institutional (City)(pending ANX2002-05007). mcd0802 15 08/20/02 Proposed Use: A new 12,000 square foot Place of Worship facility in addition to the three existing retreat buildings. Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner. This Future Land Use Plan amendment and rezoning application involves eight (8) parcels of land located on the east side of South Bayview Drive and on the north and south sides of Penmar Drive, south of Gulf To Bay Boulevard. These properties are approximately 134,164 square feet or 3.08 acres. Three of the parcels are occupied by structures used in conjunction with the applicant’s adjacent property; the remainder of the parcels are vacant. Currently, the applicant has no plans to modify any of the three existing structures located on the subject site. A companion application to annex the five vacant properties into the City of Clearwater is being processed concurrently with this land use plan and rezoning amendment (Case# ANX 2002-05007). All of the parcels on the subject site have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL). The properties located in the County are zoned One, Two & Three Family Residential (R-4) and the properties located in the City are zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Plan to designate all of the properties Institutional and to rezone them to the Institutional (I) District to accommodate a place of worship on this site. The applicant intends to raze a 3,500 square-foot place of worship facility used for meditation, schooling, library and administration purposes on its property west of the subject site and relocate/construct a new 12,000 square-foot place of worship comparable in use on the proposed site. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. The proposed Institutional land use plan classification and the Institutional zoning district are well suited for the surrounding uses. The neighborhood is surrounded by institutional and low medium density residential uses. The proposed place of worship use will blend into the existing neighborhood and serve as a buffer between transportation/utility and water/drainage uses to the east and low medium density residential uses to the west and north. Finally, the proposed Institutional Future Land Use classification and Institutional zoning district are consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, are compatible with the surrounding area, do not require nor affect the provision of public services, are compatible with the natural environment and are consistent with the development regulations of the City. The Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions: 1) Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of 717, 719, 721, 723 and 725 South Bayview Avenue & 3018 and 3024 Penmar Drive; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths Bay View Subdivision from Residential Low (RL) to Institutional (I)(pending case # ANX 2002-05007) and 2) Amend the Zoning District designation of 717, 719, 721, 723 and 725 South Bayview Avenue & 3018 and 3024 Penmar Drive; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths Bay View Subdivision from County One, Two & Three Family Residential (R-4) and City Low Density Residential (LDR) to Institutional (I) zoning district (pending case # ANX 2002-05007). In response to a question, Planner Marc A. Mariano said according to plans, current buildings will be retained. As the total land area of 6.09 acres exceeds the County threshold of 5 acres, the Land Use Plan Amendment must be changed to Institution. As uses are not being mcd0802 16 08/20/02 added, the traffic engineer felt the change would not adversely affect Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard traffic. In response to a question, Mr. Mariano reviewed possible uses permitted under Institutional zoning. However, the County does not allow those uses in a flood plain, such as the one existing on the subject property. Harry Cline, representative, said parking issues will be addressed during the site plan process. He said the request is consistent with nearby land uses and zoning. He said the meditative retreat has been in its current location for more than 20 years. He said the changes will not unreasonably impact the community. The retreat, associated with the Roman Catholic Church, can schedule Mass only once a week, on Tuesdays at 2:00 p.m. Except for that one event, most people arrive in random patterns. The new building, a house of prayer, will replace one across the street. The retreat does not intend to increase its capacity but to improve its quality in a larger building. He referenced five letters from neighbors supporting the project. Robert Pergolizzi and Robert Resch, representatives, spoke in support of the project. Mr. Pergolizzi stated if 15 homes were constructed on the property, the number of daily trips would be greater than for a retreat. He said many trees would have to be removed for home construction, while the proposed project aims to retain as many trees as possible. He said the project meets County goals to avoid construction of homes in a flood plain. Mr. Resch said the current prayer chapel needs significant repairs. The retreat has removed 6,000 square-feet of structures and plans to remove another 4,100 square-feet. The new building is a concept at this point. On-site grass parking is planned with paved parking to comply with City requirements. Mr. Resch said most attendees are mature adults. The site will center on a large water feature and comply with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. As proposed, he said the project will retain the neighborhood’s residential character. Diane Brown, President and Director of the Our Lady of Divine Providence, House of Prayer, Inc., reviewed the history of the retreat, which attracts people from around the world. A spiritual director ministers to their needs. An on-site school teaches spiritual direction. She said most attendees fly here and arrive via airport transport. The 100-member volunteer staff works staggered schedules. In response to a question, she said the retreat can accommodate 35. She said the new facility is strictly a house of prayer and will not feature overnight accommodations. She said the Catholic Church does not permit on-site weddings, funerals, baptisms, or other services like a normal church has. In response to a question, she said the prayer chapel will accommodate 125 for Tuesday Mass. Phil Graham, landscape architect, reviewed plans for a passive, reflective, and contemplative retreat with open vistas, added trees and plantings, and benches positioned in niches with vistas. He said the project will have a low impact on the environment. Six persons opposed the request. Mr. Cline presented a letter from SWFWMD (Southwest Florida Water Management District) indicating referenced fill was not in violation of the law. Ms. Tarapani said while an Indian midden is on-site; it is not a burial ground. It is possible the project will meet all standards without flexibility. Ms. Dougall-Sides said it is necessary for the CDB to base its recommendation on competent evidence. It was stated residents demanding that no change occur in the area were silent when the nearby mobile home park was removed. It was felt single-family residences, built on stilts, mcd0802 17 08/20/02 would block views and impact the neighborhood more significantly than the retreat. It was noted this pristine spot is one of few remaining in the area. It was felt it is important to retain the property’s quiet ambiance. Member Doran moved to approve Item D2 with conditions as listed, Case LUZ2002- motion carried 05006. The was duly seconded and unanimously. (Alternate Board Member Milam voted.) E. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS: Revised time extension request 1. Dolphin Point October 16, 2002 to October 16, 2003 (FL 01-08-26) Ms. Fierce said the applicant has requested a time extension to apply for a building permit. Member Hooper moved to revise the time extension request for Dolphin Point from motion October 16, 2002 to October 16, 2003, Case Florida 01-08-26. The was duly seconded carried and unanimously. (Alternate Board Member Milam voted.) F. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:52 p.m. mcd0802 18 08/20/02 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: AU2ust 20, 2002 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1370 Gulf Blvd. FLD2X,-05014 The Renaissance on Sand Key yes no 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. DA01\01 Clearwater Seashell Resort yes no 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. FLD 02\-12 Clearwater Seashell Resort yes no 915 & 915 Y2 Turner St. yes FLD 02\11 no Carpenter 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 & 3024 Penmar Dr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision ANX2\5007 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer yes no 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 & 3024 PenmarDr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision LUZ2\05006 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer yes no Signature: 193 Devon Dr. Mariani Dock Date: ~17~2- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: AU2ust 20, 2002 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1370 Gulf Blvd. FLD2002-050 14 The Renaissance on Sand Key ,/ yes no 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. / DA 01-01-01 Clearwater Seashell Resort yes no 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. .j yes FLD 02-04 -12 Clearwater Seashell Resort no 915 & 915 Yz Tumer)k V yes FLD 02-04-11 Carpenter no 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 & 3024 Penmar Dr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision / ANX2002-05007 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer v yes no 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 & 3024 Penmar Dr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision / LUZ2002-05006 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer yes no 193 Devon Dr. /' yes APP2002- Mariani Dock no Signature: ~. . ::>{'2 S:\Planning Depa~ B\CDB, property investigation,A'ck list.doc Date: f) j2LJ I () -v COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: August 20, 2002 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. " 1370 Gulf Blvd. / yes FLD2002-050 14 The Renaissance on Sand Key no 301 S. Gu1fview 2 yes DA 01-01-01 Clearwater Seashell Resort no 301 S. Gulfview ~ yes FLD 02-04 -12 Clearwater Seashell Resort no 915 & 915 V,Tu;n " [/"S\es FLD 02-04-11 Carpenter no 712 & 723 S. BaYL1:ie :Ave.; 3018 & 3024 PenmarDr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision ANX2002-05007 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer yes no 712 & 723 S. Baivie Ave.; 3018 & 3024 Penmar Dr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision LUZ2002-05006 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer yes no 193 Devon Dr. APP2002- Mariani Dock no Signature: Date: ~~Iov COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: AU2ust 20, 2002 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1370 Gulf Blvd. FLD2002-oj> 14 J no The Renaissance on Sand Key yes 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. DA 01-01-01 ,/' no Clearwater Seashell Resort yes 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. FLD 02-04 -12 vI'" Clearwater Seashell Resort yes no 915 & 915 Y2 Turner $t. J yes FLD 02-04-11 Carpenter no 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 & 3024Yenmar Dr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision ANX20~5007 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer yes no 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 &~02 ~nmarDr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision LUZ2092 5006 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer yes no 193 Devon Dr. Jyes APP2002- Mariani Dock no Date: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: AU2ust 20, 2002 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1370 Gulf Blvd. FLD2002-050 14 The Renaissance on Sand Key --- yes no 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. DA 01-01-01 Clearwater Seashell Resort ~ yes no 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. FLD 02-04 -12 Clearwater Seashell Resort ~ yes no 915 & 915 Y2 Turner St. FLD 02-04-11 ....--- yes no Carpenter 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 & 3024 Pen mar Dr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision ANX2002-05007 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer '--"" yes no 712 & 723 S. Bayview Ave.; 3018 & 3024 Penmar Dr.; and Lot 5, Tract B of the Myron A. Smiths View Subdivision LUZ2002-05006 Our Lady of the Divine Providence, House of Prayer ~yes no 193 Devon Dr. APP2002- Mariani Dock L----Yes no Signature: Date: ~ \~\ ~2.