11/13/2001
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 13, 2001
Present: Gerald Figurski Chair
Carlen A. Petersen Vice Chair
David Gildersleeve Board Member
Edward Mazur, Jr. Board Member
Shirley Moran Board Member
Alex Plisko Board Member
Ed Hooper Board Member
Frank Hibbard Alternate Board Member (non-voting)
Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney
Cynthia Tarapani Planning Director
Lisa L. Fierce Assistant Planning Director
Gina Clayton Long Range Planning Manager
Brenda Moses Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:04 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING:
October 16, 2001
Member Petersen moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of October
motion
16, 2001, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The was
carried
duly seconded and unanimously.
Member Petersen moved to approve the minutes of the special meeting of October
motion
25, 2001, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The was
carried
duly seconded and unanimously.
B. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
(Items 1-3). The following cases are not contested
by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a
single vote at the beginning of the meeting.
Case:
1. ATA ANX 01-07-18 – 2684 N. Terrace Drive Level Three Application –
Continued from 10/16/01 meeting
Owner/Applicant
: Pamela L. Rakes.
Location:
0.32 acres on the north side of North Terrace Drive, approximately
240 feet south of Morningside Drive and 120 feet west of Evans Drive.
Atlas Page:
264A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.32 acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL,
Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and
mcd1101 1 11/13/01
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low
Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Presenter:
Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request at 2684 North Terrace
Drive to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms and
conditions established in the Agreement to Annex of December 1, 1983. The City has
been providing sewer service to the subject property since December 1, 1983, and
capacity continues to be available for this utility. Therefore the proposed annexation of
this property will not affect the provision of public facilities. The proposed annexation
and the existing use are consistent with both the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the
Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and
policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single family home is consistent
with the LMDR zoning district.
The proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal
annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in
concentration. The current property owner has already paid the required $200.00
recreation impact fee that is required to be paid prior to the adoption of the associated
ordinances.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval.
Member Hooper moved to recommend approval of Case ATA ANX 01-07-18. The
motioncarried
was duly seconded and unanimously.
Case:
2. ANX 01-09-27 – 1262 Brookside Drive Level Three Application
Owners/Applicants: Eric M. Zebley & Calista A. Zebley.
Location:
0.24 acres on the west side of Brookside Road, approximately 110
feet south of north of Lakeview Road.
Atlas Page:
308A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.24 acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL,
Residential Low Classification (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low
Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Presenter:
Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
The proposed annexation at 1262 Brookside Drive can be served by City of
Clearwater services, including sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical
services without any adverse effect on the service level. The applicants have paid the
applicable sewer impact fee of $900.00 and are also aware of the additional cost to
connect the property to the City sewer system.
The proposed annexation and existing use are consistent with both the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use
Map as well as goals and policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single
family home is consistent with the LMDR zoning district. Finally, the proposed
mcd1101 2 11/13/01
annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its
adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval.
AND
Case:
3. LUZ 01-09-07 – 807 Jeffords Street Level Three Application
Owner/Applicant: Edsel D. Hargis & Vicki A. Hargis.
Location:
0.17 acres on the south side of Jeffords Street, approximately 110 feet
east of Myrtle Avenue and 150 feet north of Grand Central Street.
Atlas Page
: 306A.
Request:
(a) Land use Plan amendment from Residential/Office General (R/OG) to
Residential Urban Classification (RU); and
(b) Rezoning from O, Office District to MDR, Medium Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: Existing single family dwelling.
Presenter:
Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
An amendment to the Future Land Use Plan from Residential/Office General to
Residential Urban and a rezoning from Office (O) zoning district to the Medium Density
Residential (MDR) zoning district for the subject property is necessary to bring this
existing non-conforming residential use into conformity with the Community
Development Code.
The proposed amendment is compatible with the existing uses in the area. The
immediate surrounding properties are predominately residential. The proposed rezoning
and land use plan amendment will enhance the redevelopment of this site, which will
result in increasing property values and attractiveness of the area. The amendment is
consistent with and furthers the goals, policies and objectives of the Community
Development Code to promote infill development.
The proposed Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use classification and the
Medium Density Residential (MDR) zoning district at 807 Jeffords Street is consistent
with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the
surrounding area, does not affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the
natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. The
Planning Department recommends approval.
Member Gildersleeve moved to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Items
motion
B2 and B3, Cases ANX 01-09-27, and LUZ 01-09-07. The was duly seconded
carried
and unanimously.
C. NON-CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
(Items 1-4):
Case:
1. ATA ANX 01-07-17 – 2678 N. Terrace Drive Level Three Application –
Continued from 10/16/01 meeting
Owner/Applicant
: Alicia A. Medeiros
Location:
0.21 acres on the north side of North Terrace Drive, approximately
240 feet south of Morningside Drive.
Atlas Page:
264A.
mcd1101 3 11/13/01
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.21 acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL,
Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low
Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Presenter:
Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
The City of Clearwater is initiating this annexation request at 2678 North Terrace
Drive, on the north side of North Terrace Drive, approximately 240 feet south of
Morningside Drive to bring this property into its jurisdiction in compliance with the terms
and conditions established in the Agreement to Annex of October 18, 1996. The City
has been providing sewer service to the subject property since October 18, 1996 and
capacity continues to be available for this utility. Therefore the proposed annexation of
this property will not affect the provision of public facilities. The proposed annexation
and the existing use are consistent with both the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the
Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and
policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single family home is consistent
with the LMDR zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with
Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City
boundaries and is compact in concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval.
Long Range Planning Manager Gina Clayton said this case had been continued
to today’s meeting due to the applicant’s concerns regarding how a ditch improvement
being done by the County would affect her property.
Assistant Director of Engineering/PD&E Tom Miller said staff met with the
Pinellas County drainage and stormwater staff regarding the ditch project. The project
involves improvements behind some residents’ homes that are being considered for
annexation. After hearing residents’ concerns, the County has requested the City
postpone the decision to annex these properties until they take a closer look at the area.
In response to a question, Mr. Miller said he felt 2 weeks would give the County
sufficient time to make a determination of the project. It was suggested the CDB
(Community Development Board) could proceed with the annexation approval today and
ample time for the County’s determination would take place between first and second
reading of the annexation by the City Commission.
Alicia A. Medeiros, affected property owner, said she is opposed to the
annexation. She said she spoke to County staff who indicated they thought only 2 or 3
homes were being annexed into the City. She said there are a minimum of 4 houses in
this area being considered for annexation. She said all the houses in the area are on
septic tanks and will want to obtain City sewer service, therefore more annexations
would take place. Her concern is that residents along the creek have been trying to
obtain information on the ditch improvement project to no avail. Some residents have
already lost their swimming pools and experienced foundation problems. She worries
that if the city annexes these properties, and the County decides the ditch improvement
project is too costly, the residents will be in limbo. She was told by a County official that
if the County does not complete the improvement project, it could cost residents $40,000
mcd1101 4 11/13/01
to $50,000 to make the improvements. She requested the City wait to annex these
properties until 2002/03 when the County can complete the ditch improvement project.
Ms. Medeiros also expressed concern regarding City-estimated utility fees that
were based on a $50 monthly electric bill. She cannot afford the higher tax and
requested the City not annex her property.
Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani said there are 23 properties north and south of
the ditch. The ditch also extends to the east. She said staff is working with the County
regarding responsibility of maintenance of the ditch (City or County) upon annexation.
Hopes are that senior City and County staff would become involved in those
discussions. She suggested the CDB consider if Ms. Medeiros was aware of her
obligations at the time she signed the ATA (Agreement to Annex). Ms. Medeiros is
already receiving sewer service.
In response to a question, Ms. Clayton said Ms. Medeiros has not been charged
or paid for sewer service since she started receiving it. Current Code only permits the
City to collect retroactive fees back to a one-year period. Ms. Clayton said if Ms.
Medeiros submits her utility bills to staff, they would help her get a better idea of what
the utility fees would be upon annexation. In response to a question, Ms. Clayton said
the properties to the north of Ms. Medeiros’ property could become contiguous due to
these annexations.
Member Gildersleeve moved to recommend approval of Case ATA ANX 01-07-
motioncarried
17. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
Case:
2. Amendment to Beach by Design Special Area Plan Level Three
Application
Applicant:
City of Clearwater, Planning Department.
Request
: Amendments to the Beach by Design Marina Residential District
provisions regarding land consolidation, height, and City incentive options and
the Design Guidelines regarding height in that district.
Presenter:
Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
In recognition of the Marina Residential District’s location on a busy waterfront
area, the proposed amendment to Beach by Design permits limited retail and restaurant
uses within the District south of Baymont Street instead of only by the Causeway and
immediately south of Baymont Street. Because it is extremely unlikely that consolidation
of the entire District can be achieved by a single owner, the proposed amendment offers
incentives for the consolidation of the District into 3 blocks. To stimulate this
redevelopment, the amendment offers incentives but also requires developer
contribution to the community by providing invaluable public amenities along the intra-
coastal waterway, as well as streetscape improvements within the rights-of-way. The
proposed amendment retains the concept set forth in the adopted Beach by Design of
the City working with private property to owners to gain consolidated redevelopment in
the event it does not happen by the private sector.
Beach by Design currently supports building heights over 100 feet only in
instances where the density pool is used in 3 specific areas on Clearwater Beach or if a
project uses transfer of development rights. Beach by Design has established the City’s
policy that greater building heights should primarily be used to attain the goal of
mcd1101 5 11/13/01
repositioning Clearwater Beach as a quality family oriented destination resort
community. The Planning Department supports a maximum height on the Yacht Basin
Apartment property, also known as the Mack site, of up to 100 feet in height.
Staff recommends approval of the amendments to Beach by Design, with the
following bases.
Bases for approval: 1) The proposed amendments are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Community Development Code; 2) Beach by Design, as
amended, provides a realistic framework for the redevelopment of Clearwater Beach; 3)
the amendments refine an established distinct land use district identified in Beach by
Design that recognizes existing and desired development patterns; and 4) the Plan
provides for compatible land uses and design options that are in keeping with the City’s
vision for this area of Clearwater Beach.
It was noted that a letter of opposition was received. Assistant Planning Director
Lisa Fierce said she has tried to contact the resident to no avail.
Ed Armstrong, representative for David Mack, said his client is requesting
changes to staff’s proposal for this case and Case FL 01-09-31. He requested that
Condition #4 of Case FL 09-01-03 be amended to reflect that the streetscaping along
Mandalay Avenue north of the project entrance road be completed prior to the issuance
of the final C.O. (certificate of occupancy) on the north phase and that the balance of
streetscaping be completed prior to issuance of the final C.O. for the final phase of the
project. He noted that due to residents’ concerns regarding a tennis court at the
northwest corner of the property, the applicant does not intend to construct the tennis
courts but plans a passive use in the same area.
In response to a question, Mr. Armstrong said there would be no public access to
the marina portion of the project. There would be no boardwalk. He noted there is
streetscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, which extends onto this
private property. In response to a question, Mr. Armstrong said there would be no rental
pool.
Rick Gillette, architect, said the paved area along Baymont Street is a 12-foot
sidewalk. Facing that are garden courtyards at 18 feet to the building, for a total setback
of 19 feet from the property line. In response to a question, Ms. Fierce said current
setbacks are 9.8 feet along Baymont Street. Mr. Gillette referred to drawings indicating
public landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and the proposed project with building
setbacks. He said there would be enclosed garages under the townhomes with steps
leading up to the units, a courtyard, and parking behind the townhomes. Vehicles would
have ingress and egress from the Mandalay Avenue side.
In response to a question, Ms. Fierce said staff is comfortable with the proposed
changes indicated by Mr. Armstrong.
Member Gildersleeve moved to recommend approval of the amendments to
motion
Beach by Design Special Area Plan. The was duly seconded. Upon the vote
being taken, Chair Figurski and Members Petersen, Gildersleeve, Plisko, Moran, and
carried
Hibbard voted “aye”; Members Mazur and Hooper abstained. Motion .
mcd1101 6 11/13/01
3. Case:
Z 01-09-03 – 501 Mandalay Avenue Level Three Application
Owner/Applicant: Greenmack Clearwater, LLC.
Representative:
E.D. Armstrong III, Esquire.
Location:
6.164 acres on the northeast corner of Baymont Street and Mandalay
Avenue.
Atlas Page
: 267A and 258A.
Request
: Rezoning from MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District
to HDR, High Density Residential District.
Proposed UseMulti-family residential.
:
Presenter:
Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
The proposed High Density Residential zoning district at 501 Mandalay Avenue
is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, is compatible with the surrounding area,
does not conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood and City, does not
require nor affect the provision of the public services, and the boundaries are
appropriately drawn. There will be no changes in traffic generation due to the fact that
there would be no change in the maximum permitted density of 30 dwelling units per
acre.
The Planning Department recommends approval.
Member Gildersleeve moved to recommend approval of Case Z 01-09-03. The
motion
was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Chair Figurski and Members
Petersen, Gildersleeve, Plisko, Moran, and Hibbard voted “aye”; Members Mazur and
carried
Hooper abstained. Motion .
Case:
4. FL 01-09-31 – 501 Mandalay Avenue Level Two Application
Applicant:
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC.
Location:
6.164 acres located on the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and
Baymont Street.
Atlas Page:
267A and 258A.
Zoning:
HDR, High Density Residential District (pending approval of a
companion rezoning application Z01-09-03).
Request:
Flexible Development approval to increase the number of dwelling
units from 184 to 200 units as part of a Termination of Status on Nonconformity;
increase the permitted height of the northern building (North Villa) from 30 feet to
130 feet; increase the permitted height of the southern building (Midrise Villa)
from 30 feet to 99 feet; reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to
pavement; reduce the front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue from 25 feet
to zero feet to pavement; reduce the side (north) setback from 15 feet to zero
feet to pavement, within the HDR, High Density Residential District (proposed),
as part of a Residential Infill Project.
Proposed Use: A 200-unit condominium project including a 130-foot
building (North Villa with 88 units), 99-foot building (Midrise Villa with 112
units) with 25-35 foot townhomes/courtyard homes and amenities.
Presenter:
Mark T. Parry, Planner.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting
materials in October, 2001. The Planning Department recommends approval of the
Flexible Development application to permit an increase in the number of dwelling units
from 184 to 200 units under the provisions of Section 6-109 B, as a Termination of
mcd1101 7 11/13/01
Status as a Nonconformity, increase the permitted height of the North Villa (north portion
of the site) from 30 to 130 feet, increase the height of the Midrise Villa (south portion of
the site) from 30 to 99 feet, reduce the side (east) setback from 15 to zero feet to
pavement, reduce the side (north) setback from 15 to zero feet to pavement, reduce the
front (west) setback along Mandalay Avenue from 25 to zero feet to pavement, reduce
the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from, 25 to 18 feet for building and to
reduce the front (south) setback along Baymont Street from 25 to zero feet for pavement
within the (pending) HDR, High Density Residential District, for the site at 501 Mandalay
Avenue, with the following bases and subject to the following conditions:
Bases for approval: 1) The proposal, as amended with respect to height, complies with
Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of
Section 2-504; 2) the project, as amended, complies with General Applicability Criteria
under the provisions of Section 3-913; 3) the plan, as amended, complies with the
Termination of Status as a Nonconformity under the provisions of Section 6-109 B; and
4) the proposed development, as amended, is consistent with the companion
amendments to Beach by Design and the rezoning application for HDR District.
Conditions: 1) The companion Beach by Design Special Area Plan and rezoning
amendments be approved by the City Commission; 2) the density be limited to 200
dwellings units; 3) a contribution to a future parking garage in the area be made, as
determined by the City Commission; 4) the streetscape improvements along Baymont
Street and Mandalay Avenue be installed within 2 phases: Phase One includes the area
along Mandalay Avenue north of the entrance of the site, to be completed prior to the
issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy for the North Villa; Phase Two includes the
Baymont Street frontage and the balance of Mandalay Avenue (south of the entrance),
to be installed prior to the issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy of the Midrise
Villa; 5) the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB; 6) solid waste and stormwater management
requirements to be met, prior to issuance of building permits; 7) a setback reduction for
all structures including swimming pools, spas and pavement along the seawall be
secured through application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and
Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance of building permits; 8) all signage comply with
Code; and 9) any future dock request meet Code requirements including review by CDB
under a separate application.
Member Hibbard moved to approve Case FL 01-09-31, amending Condition #4
as follows: 1) Condition #4 of Case FL 09-01-03 be amended to reflect that the
streetscaping along Mandalay Avenue north of the project entrance road be completed
prior to the issuance of the final C.O. (certificate of occupancy) on the north phase and
that the balance of streetscaping be completed prior to issuance of the final C.O. for the
final phase of the project. It was noted that due to residents’ concerns regarding a tennis
court at the northwest corner of the property, the applicant does not intend to construct
tennis courts but plans a passive use in the same area. Staff stated that even if they are
motion
shown in the plans, the applicant is not obligated to build them. The was duly
seconded.
Member Hibbard amended the motion to approve Case FL 01-09-31, amending:
1) Condition #4 be amended to reflect that the streetscaping along Mandalay Avenue
north of the project entrance road be completed prior to the issuance of the final C.O.
(certificate of occupancy) on the north, and 2) language related to construction of the
mcd1101 8 11/13/01
motion
tennis courts remain in the proposal. The was duly seconded. Upon the vote
being taken, Chair Figurski and Members Petersen, Gildersleeve, Plisko, Moran, and
carried
Hibbard voted “aye”; Members Mazur and Hooper abstained. Motion .
D. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS
: Addition to expert witness list – Wayne Wells,
Senior Planner
Ms. Fierce introduced Senior Planner Wayne Wells as an expert staff witness in
the fields of general planning, zoning, site plan analysis, and code administration.
Member Gildersleeve moved to accept Mr. Wells as an expert witness in the
fields of general planning, zoning, site plan analysis, and code administration. The
motioncarried
was duly seconded and unanimously.
Member Moran said the CDB Christmas luncheon is scheduled for December 11,
2001, at 12:00 p.m. at the Harborview Center. The price is the same as last year at
$15.22 per person. She also contacted Barbara Green of Everybody’s Tabernacle
regarding the CDB’s holiday donations. Ms. Green requested the gifts be unwrapped.
Member Moran reminded everyone to remember to also bring canned goods. In
response to a question, Ms. Moran said Ms. Green’s assistant will attend the CDB
luncheon and can provide information regarding monetary donations.
City staff was complimented for an ongoing job well done.
Member Hooper said that this year, we all have even more reason to give thanks
for those things and people near and dear to us.
E. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 2:52 p.m.
mcd1101 9 11/13/01
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 13., 2001
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Alicia A. Medeiros - ATA ANX 01-07-17 - 2678 N. Terrace Drive
yes / no
Pamela L. Rakes - ATA ANX 01-07-18 - 2684 N. Terrace Drive
yes ./ no
Eric M. and Calista A. Zebley - ANX 01-09-27 - 1262 Brookside Drive
yes ../' no
Edsel D. and Vicki A. Hargis - LUZ 01-09-07 - 807 Jeffords Street
~ yes -if!!ii/!!!; no
Greenmack Clearw~, LLC. - Z 01-09-03 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
yes no
Greenmack Clearwatyr, LLC. - FL 01-09-31 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
./ yes no
II/j/o;
, D~te
S:\Planning Department\C 0 B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 13" 2001
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Alicia A. Medeiros - ATA ANX 01-07-17 - 2678 N. Terrace Drive
------ yes no
Pamela L. Rakes - ATA ANX 01-07-18 - 2684 N. Terrace Drive
~ yes no
Eric M. and Calista A. Zebley - ANX 01-09-27 - 1262 Brookside Drive
c..----yes no
Edsel D. and Vicki A. Hargis - LUZ 01-09-07 - 807 Jeffords Street
~~ yes no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - Z 01-09-03 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
~ yes no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - FL 01-09-31 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
L---// yes no
\~ \3\ \)\
\bat~ \
S:\Planning Department\C 0 B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
r
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 13., 2001
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Alicia A. Medeiros - ATA ANX 01-07-17 - 2678 N. Terrace Drive
yes ./' no
Pamela L. Rakes - ATA ANX 01-07-18 - 2684 N. Terrace Drive
yes ~ no
Eric M. and Calista A. Zebley - ANX 01-09-27 - 1262 Brookside Drive
yes / no
Edsel D. and Vicki A. Hargis - LUZ 01-09-07 - 807 Jeffords Street
yes /" no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - Z 01-09-03 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
yes ~ no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - FL 01-09-31 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
yes ~ no
~c~~~
Signature
\\- l""3-01
Date
S:\PJanning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 13., 2001
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Alicia A. Medeiros - ATA ANX 01-.00\14 -. - 2678 N. Terrace Drive
yes ~no
Pamela L. Rakes - AT A ANX 0 1-07~ 2684 N. Terrace Drive
yes ~no
Eric M. and Calista A. Zebley - AN~ -09-27 - 1262 Brookside Drive
yes no
Edsel D. and Vicki A. Hargis - LUZ ~09-07 - 807 Jeffords Street
yes no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - Z 01~03 - SOl Mandatay Avenue
yes no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - FL 0 ~-31 - 50 I Mandalay Avenue
yes no
(fir/
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 13., 2001
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Alicia A. Medeiros - ATA ANX 01-0~ - 2678 N. Terrace Drive
yes no
Pamela L. Rakes - ATA ANX 01-07-1i- 2684 N. Terrace Drive
yes cr no
Eric M. and Calista A. Zebley- AN~709-27 -1262 Brookside Drive
yes . no
Edsel D. and Vicki A. Hargis - LUZ 19-07 - 807 Jeffords Street
yes . no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - Z 01-09-/>3 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
yes .~ no
Greenmack Clemwater, LLC. - FL 0l}-31 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
yes no
I
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 13" 2001
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Alicia A. Medeiros - ATA ANX 01-07-17 - 2678 N. Terrace Drive
yes )( no
Pamela L. Rakes - ATA ANX 01-07-18 - 2684 N. Terrace Drive
yes ~ no
Eric M. and Calista A. Zebley - ANX 01-09-27 - 1262 Brookside Drive
yes ~ no
Edsel D. and Vicki A. Hargis - LUZ 01-09-07 - 807 Jeffords Street
yes ~ no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - Z 01-09-03 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
)( yes no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - FL 01-09-31 - 501 Mandalay Avenue
)(. yes no
/1- / S ;OJ I
Date
S:\Planning Department\C 0 B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 13" 2001
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
Alicia A. Medeiros - ATA ANX 01717 - 2678 N. Terrace Drive
yes no
Pamela L. Rakes - ATA ANX 01-07-1Y'2684 N. Terrace Drive
yes no
Eric M. and Calista A. Zebley - ANX 79-27 - 1262 Brookside Drive
yes no
Edsel D. and Vicki A. Hargis - LUZ 01-09~7 - 807 Jeffords Street
yes ~no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - Z 01-09-.A3 - 501 Manda1ay Avenue
yes 1/" no
Greenmack Clearwater, LLC. - FL 01-~31 - 501 Manda1ay Avenue
yes no
II
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc