12/12/2000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
December 12, 2000
Present: Gerald Figurski Chair – departed 4:02 p.m.
Edward Mazur, Jr. Vice Chair/Acting Chair at 4:11 p.m.
David Gildersleeve Board Member
William Johnson Board Member
Shirley Moran Board Member
Carlen A. Petersen Board Member
Alex Plisko Board Member
Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney
Ralph Stone Planning Director
Cynthia Hardin Assistant Planning Director
Lisa L. Fierce Development Review Manager
Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter
The board and staff gathered for a holiday luncheon at 11:30 a.m. at the
Harborview Center. The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall,
followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
ITEM A - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE/RECONSIDERATION
- None.
ITEM B - CONTINUED ITEMS
2217 South Lagoon Circle:
Item #B1 - John A. Shaw & Cathie A. Shaw –
Owner/Applicant. Request annexation of 0.14 acre lot with Land Use Plan Amendment
to RL, Residential Low Classification and Rezoning to LMDR, Low Medium Density
ANX 00-08-22
Residential District at Lot 162, Clearwater Manor.
Senior Planner Etim Udoh reviewed the request. The property owners have
requested annexation to receive City sewer service. The property will have a land use
plan designation of Residential Low and is proposed to be zoned Low Medium Density
Residential (LMDR). The site features a single-family residence. This annexation will
eliminate an enclave.
Member Johnson moved for the CDB (Community Development Board) to
recommend approval of the annexation of a 0.14 acre lot with Land Use Plan
Amendment to RL, Residential Low Classification and Rezoning to LMDR, Low Medium
motion
Density Residential District at Lot 162, Clearwater Manor. The was duly
carried
seconded and unanimously.
3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard
Item #B2 - (Cont’d from 11/21/00) - : Thanh Phuoc &
Kimtruc Thi Ngyuen/ Michael S. Caruso – Owner/Applicant. Request Flexible
Development of a nightclub in the Commercial District, with a reduction in required
mcd1200 1 12/12/00
number of parking spaces from 20 spaces to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at Bay View City Sub,
Blk 8, Lots 8, 9, 10 & 1/2 of vac alley on N less Rd. right-of-way on S.
FL 00-08-33
Planner Mark Parry reviewed the request. This case was continued on
November 21, 2000, at the applicant’s request, because all board members were not
present. The 0.283-acre site, with 126 feet of frontage on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, has a
one-story, 2,132 square-foot masonry block building with a flat roof, and no windows,
trim, or architectural relief on its exterior. The site, vacant for approximately two years,
previously featured an adult use establishment.
The applicant originally submitted a Flexible Standard development application
on February 8, 2000 (FLS 00-02-04). No decision was rendered. At that time, the
applicant requested to change the use from adult use to nightclub in the Commercial
District. After the February 24, 2000 DRC (Development Review Committee) meeting, it
was determined that parking and parking space dimensions shown on the site plan were
insufficient. The revised site plan includes 18 legally sized spaces and landscaping
within the available space. Staff determined the application should be converted to a
Flexible Development request as only the CDB, not staff, could approve the parking
reduction requested.
This applicant requests approval of a nightclub use within the Commercial
District, a reduction in parking from 20 to 18 spaces as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, a reduction of the landscape buffer width along the east, west,
and north property lines from five feet to 1.5 feet at its narrowest, and elimination of
interior landscaping, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program.
Several significant trees are on the property lines. The applicant removed one
tree as suggested by the DRC. Portions of the parking lot have pavers. The remainder
of the parking lot has partially filled potholes and needs to be repaved and restriped.
The proposal includes repaving and landscaping all property lines. The applicants
propose no changes to the structure. The lot has one access via a curb cut on Gulf-to-
Bay Boulevard. The nightclub will have a staff of 15, although no more than four would
be onsite at any time. The nightclub would be open Monday through Saturday, from
12:00 noon to 2:00 a.m. The applicant indicated the business probably would be closed
on Sundays, although limited hours between 5:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight might occur.
Other permitted uses within the Commercial District require less parking. The lot
and development pattern prevent compliance with parking and landscaping
requirements for a nightclub use, which is too intense for the site and structure. The
applicant has not shown that other sites in the City are not available for this use. The
proposed use will create a parking demand that exceeds site capabilities. The City will
not benefit from the proposed redevelopment. Only 14 spaces will be available for
patrons. It is unclear where additional patrons will park. The parking layout likely will
create congestion as patrons, who do not find a parking space, must exit onto Gulf-to-
Bay Boulevard, a high volume roadway.
The DRC also reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 24
and September 7, 2000. The proposed development provides less landscaping than
mcd1200 2 12/12/00
required by Code and will not enhance the local area or the City as a whole. Staff
recommends denial.
Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides reported since their request for a
continuance in November, the applicants have filed an injunction with the court claiming
the proposed use is legitimate.
David Browder, Jr., representative, said when the applicants originally filed their
request in February 2000, staff informed them they must follow current Code even
though the property had been licensed for the same use since 1990. He said the date
when the former use stopped is at issue. Concern was expressed the fire marshal had
not determined the building’s capacity. It was suggested police reports on the previous
use would be helpful. Assistant Planning Director Cyndi Hardin stated the previous use
was an adult use, which is different from the nightclub use requested. Mr. Browder said
he had proof that the previous use, Baby Dolls, had vacated the building in October
1999.
Member Gildersleeve moved to accept items submitted by Mr. Browder: 1)
copies of repair bills for asphalt repairs; 2) copy of application for occupational license
dated February 4, 2000, and 3) copy of August 25, 1999 letter from Assistant City
Attorney Robert Surette to representative Luke Charles Lirot. The letter requests
submission of occupational license applications for October 1, 1999 to September 30,
2000 permits for Tattletales and Babydolls, as the businesses do not fit the definition of
motion
“adult uses” under the zoning ordinance revised in January 1999. The was duly
carried
seconded and unanimously.
Mr. Browder said the property had a nightclub use until October 9, 1999. The
applicants submitted a copy of an application for occupational license dated February 4,
2000. The tree’s removal was based on staff recommendation. While the applicant has
contracted and completed renovation of the parking lot, he said Clamdiggers, next door,
has no paved parking. He said the applicant is working on obtaining permission from the
abutting Wilder property for access and additional parking.
Concern was expressed nightclub uses have significant parking needs. In
response to a question, Mr. Browder said the use would not require as many parking
spaces as Code requires because the neighborhood type nightclub will generate less
vehicular traffic than normal. Mike Caruso, applicant, said staff had indicated a fire
marshal inspection was not necessary. He said the business will have 14 chairs and 5
bar stools. He expected some patrons would walk to the business from nearby offices
and the nearby hotel under construction. He had no documentation proving these
expectations.
In response to a question, Mr. Caruso said the applicants are is in discussion
with the manager of the Wilder Building regarding parking on that property. He stated
the applicants are in the process of obtaining insurance to cover patron parking on the
office building property to meet the property owner’s concerns. It was recommended
board approval be delayed until negotiations related to increasing patron parking are
finalized.
Mary Carotenuto reported Maurice Wilder, owner of the Wilder Building property,
had requested she address the board. She stated no negotiations are underway related
mcd1200 3 12/12/00
to nightclub patron parking on the Wilder property. She stated property management
opposes the proposed use out of concern for tenant security, noting patrons of the
previous business often had strewn trash and glass on the Wilder property.
In response to a question, Mr. Browder said staff had not made any
recommendations related to upgrading the appearance of the subject property, stating
the use will improve a vacant property. He suggested the applicants may be able to
reach agreement with a nearby property owner to provide the additional parking
necessary to meet Code. It was stated patrons could not cross Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard to
reach parking spaces. It was felt the applicant should have the ability to try to locate
additional parking.
Planning Director Ralph Stone said staff had recommended to the property
owners options for the property, such as office or retail, which conform with code. It was
noted adequate landscaping would require a reduction in the number of onsite parking
spaces.
Member Gildersleeve moved to continue Item #B2 to January 23, 2001. The
motion carried
was duly seconded and unanimously.
Development Review Manager Lisa Fierce recommended continuing the item to
February to provide the applicants adequate time to submit an amended site plan. It
was noted issues related to grandfathering a previous use need to be reviewed.
Consensus was to continue Item #B2 to February 20, 2001.
7 Rockaway Street
Item #B3 - (Cont’d from 11/21/00) - : Charalampos & Sevasti Alexiou
(Kirk Construction) – Owner/Applicant. Request Flexible Development to reduce the
front setback from 10 ft to 0 ft, reduce the rear setback from 10 ft to 0 ft and reduce the
required number of parking spaces from 71 spaces to 13 parking spaces, reduce
required number of handicap spaces from 6 to 1, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
FL
Redevelopment Project at Miller's Replat, Lots 2, 3 & vacated Beach Dr. on West.
00-07-29
Member Mazur reported he had a conflict of interest and left the dais.
Mr. Parry reviewed the request. This case was continued from the November 21,
2000 CDB (Community Development Board) meeting after a lengthy discussion. The
CDB voted 3:2 to approve the application. As 4 votes are needed to take action, the
item was continued. Minor changes to the staff report reflect the design change for the
south elevation. The proposal also includes the requisite handicap parking space.
The 0.38-acre site, fronting the Gulf of Mexico and Rockaway Street, features a
6,723 square-foot, restaurant and 210 square-foot storage building, which is 3.7 feet
from the south rear property line and 2.5 feet from the east side property line. The
restaurant sits on the rear property line and is 1.7 feet from the front property line. The
parking lot, on the east property line, has 13 parking spaces.
The site is in a desirable commercial neighborhood. The restaurant’s entrance, a
covered, wood deck with ramp on the north side of the building, encroaches 5.3 feet into
mcd1200 4 12/12/00
the public right-of-way. A partially covered wood deck is attached to the building,
approximately 20 feet from the west property line.
To improve customer service, the business owners wish to expand the restaurant
by adding a 3,487 square-foot, second story with approximately 1,200 square-feet of
open deck and 2,300 square-feet of enclosed space. Both sections will accommodate
bar patrons and diners; the enclosed portion will include bar seating. The addition will
accommodate 92 diners and 32 bar patrons and increase the building’s size to 10,210
square-feet and the total number of seats to 372. The applicants also propose to
remove and replace the storage room.
The second-floor addition and replaced storage room will occupy the current
foundation. The project also will renovate and improve the restaurant’s interior and
exterior. An eight-foot extension of a stucco parapet wall on the south side of the
building, as measured from the finished floor of the new second story, has been added
to buffer impacts to the abutting Clearwater Beach Hotel to the south. The existing sign
will be removed during construction but later reattached. The applicants have not
proposed additional signage.
The applicants request reducing the required front and rear setbacks from 10 feet
to zero feet and the number of required parking spaces from 71 to 13 spaces. The
restaurant currently is required to have 47 parking spaces. The proposed addition will
require an additional 24 spaces. The on-site parking lot will be restripped to include the
required handicap space, as required by Code.
Before the parking analysis was done, staff concurred with its methodology.
Florida Design Consultants has submitted a parking analysis, which includes a survey of
100 Frenchy’s customers, and a parking accumulation study performed on a Friday and
Saturday between 11:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. of Frenchy’s parking lot, Municipal Lots
#36 and 38, on-street parking along Bay Esplanade, on Mandalay Avenue between
Baymont Street and Bay Esplanade and along Rockaway Street.
The study indicated 309 parking spaces are within 1,000 feet of the restaurant
and that at least 45 parking spaces are available within the study area at any given time,
including peak times. The study also indicates that the majority of restaurant patrons
use the City-owned, metered parking immediately to the north. This parking lot serves
beach visitors and patrons of other area businesses. Of the 100 customers surveyed,
49 stated their primary destination was the beach and that eating at Frenchy’s was a
secondary purpose. This data indicate dual reasons for restaurant patrons to visit the
area and that the use of shared parking is valid for this business.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 10, 2000.
Staff recommends approval. Ms. Fierce stated the site only requires one handicap
parking space. The applicants restriped the lot to meet that requirement.
Harry Cline, representative for the Hunter family, owners of the Clearwater Beach
Hotel, said upon further review of the plan, he opposed the proposed expansion. In
response to a question from Mr. Cline related to the City’s land use plan, Mr. Parry
stated the western portion of the subject property is designated recreation open space.
mcd1200 5 12/12/00
Mr. Gildersleeve moved to accept Mr. Cline’s copy of the City’s land use plan into
motion carried
the record. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
Mr. Stone said the PPC (Pinellas Planning Council), not staff, interprets fine lines
related to open space.
In reference to minimum parking space requirement for this expansion project,
Mr. Cline said staff had based that figure on the scale minimum for parking requirements
for this type of beach business. He said the scale maximum would have more than
doubled the number of parking spaces required. Mr. Parry stated staff had based the
parking requirement on the restaurant’s pedestrian oriented location. In response to
questions from Mr. Cline, Mr. Parry said the applicants plan improvements to the
building’s architecture and exterior and wish to expand to better serve the community
and tourists. He knew of no greater parking variance request since he began his
employment with the City.
Robert Pergolizzi, representative for the applicant, said staff had approved the
methodology used to conduct the study of parking within 1,000 feet of the restaurant,
which was done on August 25 – 26, 2000, between 11:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. He said
traffic in August is well above the annual average, but below the peak in late March. In
response to questions from Mr. Cline, Mr. Pergolizzi said the football game in Tampa
and 45-minute thunderstorm Saturday evening during the study did not affect the
availability of parking.
Roy Chapman, representative for the applicant, said he is a professional
engineer and that the parking study is complete and accurate. He recommended
approval. Mr. Cline objected to Mr. Chapman’s conclusions.
Ed Armstrong, representative for the applicant, said the applicant has
demonstrated nearby parking is adequate for the expanded use. He said the applicant
intends to honor conditions agreed to previously.
Ken Hamilton, owner of the nearby Palm Pavilion restaurant, opposed the
request. In response to questions, he said his observations on the beach parking
situation since 1967 have been as a lay person, he had no hard evidence to refute the
parking study, and he never had performed a scientific parking study. Discussion
ensued regarding the weight of lay testimony. Larry Edger, representing the nearby
Cooters restaurant, also opposed the request.
Mr. Cline said when he previously had agreed to the expansion and related
conditions, he had not yet seen drawings of the proposed expansion and was unaware
of the vast scale of the project. He said the expansion is huge and would intrude on the
Clearwater Beach Hotel with light, noise, and unpleasant visuals. He said the
application is defective as no proof of ownership for the vacated roadway had been
presented. He questioned the validity of the parking study and requested the board
deny this request.
Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said the City’s zoning atlas indicates
the roadway is zoned “T.” Reference to the vacation ordinance indicates the entire width
of the roadway was vacated.
mcd1200 6 12/12/00
Mr. Stone said the applicant is aware of the parking shortage on the beach.
Discussion ensued regarding proposed parking garage projects. Staff has determined
adequate shared parking is available within 1,000 feet of the restaurant. Mr. Stone said
the study seems to indicate additional spaces will be available even if the expansion
occurs.
Mr. Armstrong stated the applicant had provided substantial competent evidence
that enough parking is available to handle the proposed expansion. He said three expert
opinions recommended approval: 1) Mr. Pergolizzi; 2) Mr. Chapman; and 3) staff.
Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to approve the request for flexible
development of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to reduce the front
setback from 10 feet to 0 feet, reduce the rear setback from 10 feet to 0 feet and reduce
the required number of parking spaces from 71 spaces to 13 parking spaces at Sec 32-
motion
28-16, part of M&B 43.06. The was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve,
Petersen and Chair Figurski voted “Aye”; Members Johnson, Moran, and Plisko voted
“Nay.” Member Mazur abstained.
Ms. Dougall-Sides stated the board’s rules do not address tied votes. She
recommended the CDB follow Roberts Rules and construe a tie as a denial. Consensus
was to follow Roberts Rule and construe the tie as a denial.
failed
Motion .
ITEM C – LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS
Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DRI) amendment
Item #C1 – :Park
Place Land, Ltd., c/o Clinton International Group, Inc./Tim Johnson – Owner/ Applicant.
Propose change to approved DRI: 1) reduce approved office and retail space; 2) provide
land use conversion factor for multi-family and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of DRI; and 3)
extend DRI buildout date by three years to December 31, 2003 at a portion of Section 17,
Township 29 South, Range 16 East.
Member Mazur remained off the dais. He earlier announced he had a conflict of
interest.
Ms. Hardin reviewed the request. On September 1, 1983, the City Commission
adopted the DRI (Development of Regional Impact) order for Park Place, located
generally between Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Drew Street and between Hampton Road
and the US 19N Frontage Road. On October 20, 1983, the City Commission adopted an
amendment to the DRI to incorporate TBRPC (Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council)
recommendations.
On December 19, 1991, the City Commission adopted an amendment to the DRI
to: 1) provide 200,000 square feet for Industrial use; 2) reduce Office use by 300,000
square feet; 3) provide a FAR (Floor Area Ratio) for Industrial use; 4) amend conditions
based on phasing; 5) amend developer’s payment schedule; and 5) extend build-out
date by five years.
On January 19, 1995, the City Commission adopted an amendment to the DRI
to: 1) modify phasing; 2) decrease office development by 7,480 square feet; 3) extend
mcd1200 7 12/12/00
build-out date by four years; 4) add conversion factor for Office use to Multifamily
Residential; 5) add conversion factor for Industrial use to Office or Multifamily
Residential; and 6) modify conditions to reflect transportation network changes.
On November 21, 1996, the City Commission adopted an amendment to the DRI
to: 1) add a land use conversion factor to Parcel 4 for office and/or hotel development
and 2) reflect change in ownership.
Now, the property owner requests another amendment to the DRI. Except for
the subject parcel, the Park Place DRI is built-out. The developers have fulfilled the
development order as amended. This request: 1) adds development options for Parcel 6
to include residential and hotel units; 2) extends the build-out date to December 31,
2003; and 3) reduces the approved DRI square footage to reflect existing and proposed
uses. Current approved land use: 1) Retail/Commercial - 150,000 square-feet; 2) Office
- 635,680 square-feet; 3) Light Industrial - 200,000 square-feet; and 4) Multifamily – 390
dwelling units. The current plan for Parcel 6 is 100,000 square-feet of office.
The applicant has resolved all traffic-related concerns put forward by TBRPC.
Staff recommends approval. In response to a question, Ms. Hardin stated staff relied on
TBRPC’s approval related to traffic issues.
Tim Johnson, representative, stated the DCA (Department of Community Affairs)
had expressed no interest in this amendment and had offered no comment.
Member Johnson moved for the CDB to recommend approval of an amendment
to the DRI: 1) reduce approved office and retail space; 2) provide land use conversion
factor for multi-family and/or hotel uses for Parcel 6 of DRI; and 3) extend DRI buildout
date by three years to December 31, 2003 at a portion of Section 17, Township 29 South,
motion
Range 16 East. The was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve, Johnson,
Moran, Petersen, and Plisko and Chair Figurski voted “Aye.” Member Mazur abstained.
carried
Motion .
ITEM D - LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS
3042 Geiger Court
Item #D1 - :Warren A. & Beth S. Wilson, III – Owner/Applicant,
Request flexible development approval to reduce the side west setback from 15 feet to 6
feet and reduce rear setback from 25 feet to 10 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project
FL 00-10-36
at Landmark Palms, Lot 11 and part of Lot 12.
Mr. Mazur returned to the dais.
Planner Ryan Givens reviewed the request. The irregular, pie-shaped, 0.42-acre
site, is within Landmark Palms, a well-maintained subdivision. The entire length of the
north rear property line features an eight-foot masonry wall. The site’s 4,090 square-
foot, one-story, brick house has a steep shingled-roof and is nonconforming with respect
to required side setbacks. Where 15-feet is required, the east side setback is 9.8 feet
and the west side setback is 14.8 feet. Where 25 feet is required, the rear setback is
zero feet to the wood deck and 10.3 feet to the pool/enclosure.
The site previously was zoned RS-4, Single-Family Residential 4 District, which
required 10-foot side and rear setbacks. When the City adopted the new Code in 1999,
mcd1200 8 12/12/00
this subdivision was rezoned LDR, creating numerous side setback nonconformities.
The new zoning is intended to retain a low-density character of larger lot sizes and
increased building separations.
The applicants request to reduce the west side setback to six feet to construct a
935 square-foot, two-story addition. The finish on the addition will match the existing
house. The addition will be as close as six feet and as far as 23.2 feet from the west
property line. If the parcel had a more regular shape, the setback encroachment would
not occur. The lot’s mature oak trees and masonry wall will help buffer visual impacts to
adjacent properties.
The applicants also request to reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 10 feet to
replace an at-grade patio. Staff feels this request should not impact adjacent properties
or neighborhood character, but will improve the lot’s value.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 2,
2000. Staff recommends approval.
Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to approve flexible development to
reduce the side west setback from 15 feet to 6 feet and reduce rear setback from 25 feet
to 10 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project at Landmark Palms, Lot 11 and part of
motion carried
Lot 12. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
3164 San Pedro Street
Item #D2 - : Lawrence E. & B. Jane Boone – Owner/ Applicant.
Request flexible development approval to reduce side west setback from 15 feet to 8.4
feet as part of a Residential Infill Project at Del Oro Estates, Lot 17.
FL 00-10-38
Mr. Givens reviewed the request. This 0.25-acre lot, approximately 175 feet east
of Madera Avenue, is in the Del Oro Groves neighborhood, a well-maintained
subdivision with large lots. The site's 2,400 square-foot one-story house encroaches on
both side setbacks. Where 15 feet is required, the east setback is 7.9 feet and the west
setback is 8.4 feet. All other setbacks comply with Low Density Residential District Code
requirements.
The site previously was zoned RS-4, Single-family Residential 4 District, which
required 10-foot side and rear setbacks. When the City adopted the new Code in 1999,
this subdivision was rezoned LDR, creating numerous side setback nonconformities.
The new zoning is intended to retain a low-density character of larger lot sizes and
increased building separations.
The applicants request to reduce the west side setback to 8.4 feet to construct a
304 square-foot storage room addition to the rear of the home, accessible from the
garage. For aesthetic purposes, the applicants prefer not to construct an accessory
structure, such as a shed, in the rear yard. The proposed addition will appear to be part
of the residence. Its exterior will match the house. As proposed, the addition will not
extend farther into the side setback than the house does and will not be visible from the
street.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 2,
2000. Staff recommends approval.
mcd1200 9 12/12/00
Member Petersen moved for the CDB to approve flexible development to reduce
the side west setback from 15 feet to 8.4 feet as part of a Residential Infill Project at Del
motion carried
Oro Estates, Lot 17. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
1931 Oak Ridge Ct
Item #D3 - : Joseph C. Patty, Jr., TRE – Owner/Applicant. Request
flexible development approval to reduce front south setback from 25 feet to 20 feet, as
FL 00-10-39
part of a Residential Infill Project at Oak Ridge Court Estates, Lot 1.
Mr. Givens reviewed the request. The 0.53-acre site, on the northeast corner of
Oak Ridge Court and Sunset Point Road, is in the heavily landscaped Oak Ridge
Estates subdivision, where all homes and lots are well maintained. The site’s 4,526
square-foot two-story, Mediterranean-style house has a side-loading garage. The
extended driveway encroaches approximately 7 feet into the front setback along Sunset
Point Road. The home is in excellent condition and the site is well maintained, with a
landscaping berm along the southern property line.
This request is to reduce the south front setback from 25 feet to 20 feet. The
applicant wishes to expand the garage by 495 square-feet. On-site constraints, such as
the berm, create difficulties for vehicular access to the side-loading garage. The owner
wishes to move into the garage a large pick-up truck, now parked in the driveway. The
garage, too small to store two vehicles, is not in scale with the house. The expansion
will match the home’s design. The landscaping berm will buffer visual impacts on the
neighborhood. The proposal will improve parking and aesthetic appeal.
On November 2, 2000, the DRC reviewed the application and supporting
materials. Staff recommends approval of the request.
Member Petersen moved for the CDB to approve flexible development to reduce
the front south setback from 25 feet to 20 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project at
motion carried
Oak Ridge Court Estates, Lot 1. The was duly seconded and
unanimously.
3261 San Pedro Street
Item #D4 - : John & Catherine M. Breen – Owner/Applicant.
Request flexible development approval to reduce the east side setback from 15 feet to
13 feet and to reduce the south rear setback from 25 feet to 23 feet, as part of a
FL 00-10-41
Residential Infill Project at Del Oro Groves, Lots 329-331.
Mr. Givens reviewed the request. The 0.26-acre site, west of Maximo Avenue, is
in Del Oro Groves, where all homes are well maintained. The site is heavily landscaped,
with a large live oak tree in the east yard. The site’s 1,750 square foot one-story house
encroaches on both side setbacks. Where 15 feet is required, the east setback is 13.5
feet and the west side setback is 12.5 feet. All other setbacks comply with Low Density
Residential District Code requirements.
The site previously was zoned RS-4, Single-Family Residential 4 District, and
required 10-foot side and rear setbacks. The new Code, adopted in 1999, rezoned Del
Oro Groves to LDR and created numerous side setback nonconformities. Current
zoning is intended to retain a low-density character of larger lots and increased building
separations.
mcd1200 10 12/12/00
The applicants request to reduce the east side setback from 15 feet to 13 feet
and reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 23 feet to construct a 647 square-foot
master bedroom to the rear. The addition’s exterior will match the house. The pool and
home’s interior layout prevents locating the addition elsewhere. A second story would
be out of character with the neighborhood. As proposed, the addition will not extend
farther into the setback than the house presently does, and will not be easily seen from
the street.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 2,
2000. Staff recommends approval with one condition.
Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to approve flexible development to to
reduce the east side setback from 15 feet to 13 feet and to reduce the south rear
setback from 25 feet to 23 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project at Del Oro Groves,
Lots 329-331 with condition: addition to be constructed with lentil floor design to protect
motion carried
and preserve oak tree. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
105 S. Myrtle Avenue
Item #D5 - : Warren LTD Business Records Management, Inc. –
Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval of a temporary records
storage business in the Downtown District not to exceed one year, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at Tack and Warren, Lot 3.
FL 00-10-48
Mr. Givens reviewed the request. The 0.68 acre downtown site is on the
southeast corner of Myrtle Avenue and Park Street. Surrounding uses include a hair
salon, boat accessory store, the City Municipal Services Building, industrial
manufacturing facilities, retail, and vehicle repair. True Value Hardware previously
occupied the site. The 10,800 square-foot concrete block building has been vacant for
more than two years. The site, suburban in character, has a large 33-space parking lot.
The site's minimal landscaping, with small oaks and palmetto bushes, does not meet
Code. A full upgrade of all landscaping will be initiated when a permanent business
occupies the building. An abandoned pole sign recently was removed. An attached sign
and window signs remain on the building's north elevation.
While the neighborhood character includes a mix of uses, the intended character
is to be part of a traditional, vibrant downtown. City initiated redevelopment activities
include the Town Pond and a large, 100-unit townhouse development one-block east.
The Downtown Redevelopment Plan designates this site as commercial/office/
residential, which allows retail, service, office, and residential uses. In the interim, the
owner wishes to limit lease options to temporary uses in anticipation of future
investment.
The applicant, BRM (Business Records Management), requests locating a
temporary records storage facility on the site for not more than one year, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The company has outgrown its facility on
Eldridge Street where it has operated for approximately 19 years. BRM stores,
microfilms, copies, and digitizes documents for businesses and has a large clientele
concentrated downtown. The corporate office and main warehouse will remain at the
Eldridge Street site. The firm needs time to locate and make necessary improvements
to a more appropriate location.
mcd1200 11 12/12/00
The applicant proposes to use 8,280 square feet of the building’s first floor to
warehouse office documents. Based on the Fire Code, the Fire Inspector has prohibited
use of the upstairs. Additionally, a small customer service area for document drop-off
and retrieval will serve downtown clientele. One employee will manage the site, which
will be open on weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Small courier vans will deliver
documents to the site; semi-trucks will not be used.
The property owner has been cited for an abandoned attached sign and
abandoned window signs. No exterior modifications are proposed. No materials,
equipment, or vehicles will be stored outside at any time. Building access will be limited
to employees.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 6,
2000. While the property does not meet Code landscaping requirements, the proposal
complies with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval and with all
applicable standards of the Code. Staff recommends approval with five conditions.
Concern was expressed regarding the property owner’s responsibility for the
site’s landscaping. Mr. Givens said while the owner must maintain the property, new
landscaping requirements in the Code are not applicable until the site is redeveloped.
The freestanding sign was removed previously. Removal of the attached sign is a
condition of approval. In response to a question, Mr. Givens said this use differs from a
traditional warehouse. Staff is considering an update to the Code related to this issue.
Ms. Hardin stated the Fire Marshal had expressed concern related to the height and
volume of the room and limited use to the first floor. The applicants are searching for a
long-term site. She said it is unusual to consider a temporary use without an upgrade to
the property. It is expected redevelopment of the site, on the edge of downtown, will
occur after efforts in the downtown core.
Don Seibert, representative, stated the applicant will meet all requirements.
Member Petersen moved for the CDB to approve flexible development of a
temporary records storage business in the Downtown District not to exceed one year, as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at Tack and Warren, Lot 3 with
conditions: 1) records storage facility be approved on a temporary basis not to exceed
one year, to expire 12/12/01; 2) all abandoned signage be removed prior to issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy; 3) document storage use prohibited from occupying upper
floor; 4) all existing landscaping be maintained and pruned; 5) site limited to one 12
square-foot temporary window sign; 6) entry to stairway to upper floor be closed; 7)
storage on constructed shelving be no more than 12 feet in height; 8) emergency lights
over doors be in working order to illuminate exit signs; 9) exit sign without emergency
light function with battery back-up; 10) early warning fire detection system be installed
prior to business operation; 11) Fire Department be granted access to allow inspections
at any time as deemed necessary; and 12) all exit doors to remain unlocked and
unblocked during business hours. Either key remain in exit door that lacks a thumb latch
motion carried
or thumb latch be installed. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
1426 McMullen-Booth Road:
Item #D6 - La Cañada Holding Company/James Rapp
(Sunset Mercantile Limited Partnership) – Owner/Applicant. Request flexible
development approval to permit a self-storage business in IRT District with a reduction in
mcd1200 12 12/12/00
required number of parking spaces from 174 spaces to 147 spaces, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (amendment to approved site plan - June
20, 2000 Community Development Board Meeting) at H.H. Baskin's Replat, part of Tract
FL 00-10-40
1.
Mr. Parry reviewed the request. The 5.07-acre site, with 262 feet of frontage on
McMullen-Booth Road, is developed with a vacant, 35,200 square-foot masonry
warehouse and aluminum showroom. A building permit is active and renovation of the
warehouse into a self-storage business is underway. The applicant wishes to amend the
June 20, 2000, CDB approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
Comprehensive Landscape Program, and Comprehensive Sign Program. The board
had approved the applicant’s previous request to reduce the north side setback from 15
feet to 5 feet and increase the height of perimeter fencing from 6 feet to 10 feet with one
condition, limiting attached signage to 48 square feet
The applicant proposes amendments to the original site plan: 1) increase size of
buildings B3 and B4 by 6,675 square feet combined, increasing gross floor area from
116,000 square-feet to 122,675 square-feet. Additional 53 storage units to increase
facility total from 983 units to 1,036 units and 2) reduce parking spaces from 245 spaces
to 147 spaces. Staff feels the Code’s minimum parking requirement for this business is
in error and will work to correct the Code. According to the ITE (Institute of
Transportation Engineers), a self-storage establishment of this size generates
approximately 50 trips per day on Saturday, the peak day. The applicant proposes 147
spaces, approximately 300% of the ITE recommendation.
All other aspects and conditions of the original approved site plan remain
unchanged. All new buildings will be one story. The two-story warehouse will be
expanded with a one-story addition in accordance with the original site plan. The
applicant has worked closely with staff on the landscape plan, which exceeds the Code’s
intent. On November 2, 2000, the DRC reviewed the application and supporting
materials. Staff recommends approval with one condition.
In response to a question, James Rapp, applicant, stated this request was not
included in the original application as related plans had not been prepared in time.
Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to approve flexible development to
permit a self-storage business in IRT District with a reduction in required number of
parking spaces from 174 spaces to 147 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project (amendment to June 20, 2000 CDB approved site plan) at H.H.
Baskin's Replat, part of Tract 1 with condition: attached signage limited to 48 square feet
motion carried
. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
14 S. Evergreen Avenue:
Item #D7 - Dennis R. & Rebecca Dunn/John N. & Ann Boyce
(First Impressions) – Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval of a light
assembly establishment within the Commercial District with a reduction in required
parking from 6 spaces to 4 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
FL 00-10-
with Comprehensive Landscape Program at Overbrook, Blk 3, Lots 19 & 20.
37
Mr. Parry reviewed the request. The 0.14-acre site, on the northwest corner of
Park Street and South Evergreen Avenue, features a 1,600 square foot, one-story, 14-
mcd1200 13 12/12/00
foot high, masonry block building, approximately 10 feet from the north side property line
and 2.5 feet from the west side property line. The site, vacant for 11 years, has
deteriorated and needs painting, landscaping, parking lot resurfacing, and striping.
The applicant requests to establish a light assembly business in the Commercial
District and a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from six to four.
Planned improvements include painting the exterior, cleaning and replacing windows as
necessary, pruning trees, cleaning the site, resealing the parking lot and driveway, and
installation of landscaping in excess of the Code’s intent. Light assembly use within the
Commercial District requires Level Two, Flexible Development approval. The business
will manufacture dental appliances and will not generate noise, fumes or odors. The
site’s size limits the number of legally sized parking spaces to four. The request meets
all other criteria for this use under the Flexible Development application category.
The owner-operated business has two employees and has operated at 1525
Betty Lane for more than three years. The applicant has reported no plans to increase
the number of employees. No more than two people will be on-site at any time. The
business will not conduct on-site retail activities and does not require customer parking.
Firm employees will handle all pick-ups and deliveries.
On November 2, 2000, the DRC reviewed the application and supporting
materials. Staff recommends approval.
In response to a question, Mr. Parry said a change in use would require City
review.
Todd Pressman, representative, stated the property, vacant for 11 years, has
deteriorated and needs significant work. He said nearby uses include a 24-hour car
wash and homeless shelter. He said the ITE recommends 0.79 parking spaces per
employee for this use. It was recommended a condition require staff review should a
change of use occur.
Member Mazur moved for the CDB to approve flexible development of a light
assembly establishment within the Commercial District with a reduction in required
parking from 6 spaces to 4 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
with Comprehensive Landscape Program at Overbrook, Blk 3, Lots 19 & 20 with
condition: no change or use permitted which requires more than four parking spaces.
motion carried
The was duly seconded and unanimously.
1825 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard
Item #D8 - :Kurdi Real Estate Inc./Seydo M. Kurdi
(Amscot Corporation) – Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to
permit problematic use in Commercial District within a building which does not meet all
current land development regulations and is within 500 feet of another problematic use,
as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with Comprehensive Sign
FL 00-
Program and Comprehensive Landscape Program at Sec 13-29-15, M&B 32.04.
10-47
Mr. Parry reviewed the request. The 0.32-acre site, on the southeast corner of
Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Virginia Lane, features a 2,516 square foot, one-story,
masonry block building that is approximately three feet from the north property line along
Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and four feet from the west property line along Virginia Avenue.
mcd1200 14 12/12/00
The structure, vacant for one and one-half years, is 18 feet high, similar to neighborhood
houses to the south and commercial establishments along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The
property and building have deteriorated and need basic maintenance such as painting,
landscaping, and parking lot resurfacing and striping.
The Code considers check-cashing establishments as problematic uses and
requires a Level Two, Flexible Development approval within the Commercial District.
The application does not meet all criteria for problematic uses: 1) building is within 500
feet of another problematic use, a pawn shop and 2) building is nonconforming: a) front
setbacks on Virginia Lane and Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard too narrow; b) parking lot is zero
feet from south and east property lines; and c) site does not comply with Code
landscape requirements. The only available option for the applicant is to request a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project use.
The proposal includes establishing a problematic use within an abandoned
structure. Building improvements include painting the exterior, installing awnings and
new window treatments, and renovating the interior. The building will be ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) compliant. Planned improvements include resurfacing
and restriping the parking lot and landscaping in excess of the intent of Code. The
applicant will reduce the site’s asphalt by eliminating 13 of 26 parking spaces and
converting that space into a landscape buffer and interior landscaping.
The applicant also requests approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program
application. The site is entitled to one 13.14 square-foot attached sign on the Gulf-to-
Bay Boulevard elevation and one 10 square-foot attached sign on the Virginia Lane
elevation. The corner site also is entitled to two freestanding signs not to exceed a total
of 13.14 square feet. The Comprehensive Sign Program allows the permitted area of all
signs to be doubled. The applicant requests a 26.28 square-foot attached sign on the
Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard elevation and a 20 square-foot attached sign of on the Virginia
Lane elevation. The proposed color and design meet comprehensive sign program
requirements. No sign associated with this business will reference check-cashing
services. The proposed signs will integrate with blue awnings on the west and north
building elevations and read “Amscot Currency Exchange.” No freestanding signs are
requested.
The applicant prepared and submitted an analysis of the types of services to be
offered: 1) 20% - foreign currency exchange; 2) 30% - money order sales; 3) 20% -
income tax preparation; 4) 10% - electronic money transmittals; and 5) 20% check-
cashing. Hours of operation will be from 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 p.m., seven days per week.
Typically, a maximum of three employees will be on site at any one time. However,
during tax season, up to 5 employees may be on site. Staff feels proposed site
improvements for the abandoned, deteriorating site support redevelopment and
beautification goals for Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and the City as a whole.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 2,
2000. Staff recommends approval with two conditions.
It was stated the submitted survey has been reduced in size and is difficult to
read. Concern was expressed setback distances on the survey do not match the
request. Mr. Parry said the applicant will not expand the building nor increase the FAR
(floor area ratio). In response to a question, he said the jewelry exchange on the north
mcd1200 15 12/12/00
side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, east of this site, has an occupational license in the Pawn
Broker category.
Todd Pressman, representative, reviewed the history of the site, noting the failure
of many restaurants. He said the applicant worked with staff and met every staff
recommendation. He said the applicant plans on expensive improvements such as
repaving the parking lot and improving the landscaping. He said the site currently has
no green space. He said after removal of parking spaces to add landscaping, remaining
parking spaces will be sufficient to meet Code. He said proposed signage is less than
allowed by Code. He said check-cashing is an ancillary use.
Ian Mackechnie, applicant, said Amscot Currency Exchange, in business since
1989, has 500 employees at 25 locations in Florida. Its corporate headquarters are in
Tampa. The business is advertised in the telephone directory as an income tax
preparation service. Mr. Pressman said the use will not cause neighborhood
deterioration nor urban blight but will improve the site. He said banks and credit unions
also allow check-cashing privileges. He said the firm charges a 1.7% service charge for
check-cashing as required by State banking law. Concern was expressed the business
could not limit check-cashing services to 20% of its business. Mr. Mackechnie felt Gulf-
to-Bay Boulevard is a poor location for check-cashing services. He anticipated most of
the business will be tourist related, providing foreign currency exchange. He said he had
based his analysis of services on the firm’s other locations. In response to a question,
he said he has an option to purchase the building. Mr. Pressman submitted firm
marketing pieces.
Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to approve flexible development to to
permit problematic use in Commercial District within a building which does not meet all
current land development regulations and is within 500 feet of another problematic use,
as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with Comprehensive Sign
Program and Comprehensive Landscape Program at Sec 13-29-15, M&B 32.04 with
conditions: 1) limit signage to two attached signs, with no freestanding signs and 2)
prohibit reference to problematic use, check cashing, on any signs visible from public
motion
right-of-way or adjacent properties. The was duly seconded. Members
Gildersleeve, Johnson, Petersen, and Plisko and Chair Figurski voted “Aye”; Member
carried
Moran voted “Nay.” Motion .
The meeting recessed from 4:02 to 4:11 p.m.
880, 900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue
Item #D9 - :Jacinto Castellano & Elena
Betes/Jim Dan Inc. (Florida Marine & Resort Developers, Inc.) – Owner/Applicant.
Request flexible development approval to increase height of attached dwellings from 35
feet to 100 feet, reduce north side setback from 10 feet to 3 feet, and permit a non-
residential parking lot within the MDR District, with a Comprehensive Landscape
Program at J.A. Gorra's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3, Sue Barco Sub, Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23, and
FL00-10-46
F.T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10 & triangle land to west.
Chair Figurski reported he had a conflict of interest and left the meeting.
Mr. Givens reviewed the request. The 8.89-acre parcel, north of downtown
Clearwater and abutting Clearwater Harbor, features approximately 4.5 acres of
submerged land and 4.37 acres of upland. The north property line, bound by Nicholson
mcd1200 16 12/12/00
Street, also extends approximately 170 feet north. North Osceola Avenue bisects the
property, dividing it into distinct parcels.
The property has an array of structures. A small wood-frame house and garage
with a rental unit front Osceola along the northeast property line. Boat repair and
storage bays occupy the north property line. The east end of the marina features a
continuous line of open and covered boat slips. SunCruz, which leases the site for
docking its charter boat, occupies a one-story, masonry building along the southern
property line. A 2,000 square-foot bait shop is near the southwest corner of the
property, adjacent to the public boat ramp. A two-story masonry building, leased as
apartments, is between Osceola and North Ft. Harrison Avenue. The property is mostly
covered with asphalt. Vegetation along Osceola is poorly maintained. The City’s
Periphery Plan targets for redevelopment this site, which has a poor overall appearance.
Surrounding uses include North Ward Elementary School, single-family and
small multi-family buildings, a funeral home, Clearwater Little Theater, and the City’s
Seminole Street boat launching ramp.
The applicants propose to transform the site into a mixed-use, Key West-style
village and marina to include a 140-unit condominium building, a restaurant, retail space,
an office building, and 112 boat slips. The proposal will replace the wood-frame house,
garage, and boat repair facilities with an eight-story condominium building constructed
over a 210-space parking garage. Each unit will have balconies overlooking the harbor.
SunCruz services will cease. The applicants will replace the SunCruz building
with a 7,000 square-foot restaurant with decking that extends over the water into the
private marina. The applicants will remodel and continue to operate the retail shop. The
restaurant and shop will feature the project’s Key West architecture and color scheme.
The applicants propose to locate these two buildings approximately two feet from the
south property line, adjacent to the public boat ramps. The Fire Code requires an
emergency access aisle, at least 20-feet wide, be adjacent to the restaurant, retail/office
building and fuel facilities. As a condition of approval, staff recommends the applicants
address this issue before the issuance of building permits for the restaurant and/or
retail/office building. Parking for the restaurant must be on site and not impact the public
boat ramp parking. As a solution, a barrier should be constructed to prevent restaurant
patrons from parking at the City’s boat ramp property.
The proposal will renovate and retain 112 boat slips; 40 slips reserved for
condominium residents and 72 slips for lease to the public. The applicants will convert
the covered docks to open docks. The proposal will eliminate 92 “high and dry” boat
storage bays. Proposed changes will improve Fire Department effectiveness. The
project will convert the two-story, masonry building along Ft. Harrison to a larger 4,500
square foot office.
Of two vehicular access points off Osceola; the northernmost entrance will be
restricted to resident use. Property adjacent to Ft. Harrison is accessible from Osceola
and Ft. Harrison. The masonry building, with a minimal setback along Ft. Harrison,
creates site visibility constraints and traffic hazards. Staff recommends closing the curb
cut on Ft. Harrison. A designated pedestrian pathway will permit safe residential access
to Osceola, separated from automobile access aisles. The applicants will construct a 6-
foot sidewalk along the west side of Osceola.
mcd1200 17 12/12/00
The proposed site intensity is consistent with the 1993 Periphery Plan and the
proposed Periphery Plan 2000 update, which allows a 0.5 FAR and a density of 50 units
per acre for properties larger than two acres. The 8.89-acre site’s 4.37 acres of upland
was used to calculate project intensity. The proposed project meets density and
intensity requirements and does not utilize all of the site’s development potential.
The applicants request to increase the condominium building’s height from 35
feet to 100 feet and to reduce the north side setback from 10 feet to 3 feet. The request
also includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program. Other elements of the proposal do
not require CDB approval.
As part of a Flexible Development application, the Tourist District allows height
flexibility to a maximum of 100 feet. Height is measured from the mean elevation of the
existing grade to the highest finished roof surface for flat roofs or midpoint of the
peak/eave of the main pitched roof. The applicant requests a height of 100 feet above
the base flood elevation. The property’s slope features a grade differential of
approximately 23 feet. Land adjacent to the water is approximately 6 feet above sea
level while land adjacent to Ft. Harrison is 29 feet above sea level. As viewed from Ft.
Harrison, observers will perceive the building as being 77 feet high.
The applicants request a reduction in the side setback from 10 feet to three feet
for a 30-foot emergency vehicle access aisle along the condominium building’s north
side. Due to the building design, the parking layout, and the narrow lot size, the
emergency aisle could not be relocated and must encroach on the side setback. Staff
feels the increased building height, side setback reduction and comprehensive
landscape program are justified by the quality conceptual design, its consistency with the
Plan’s objectives, and the unique lot shape.
The DRC reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 6,
2000. Staff recommends approval with eight conditions.
In response to a question, Mr. Stone said the proposed location for the restaurant
is not zoned Preservation. Land zoned Preservation has no development potential. He
said construction on Preservation relies on the developmental potential of the upland.
Concern was expressed Seminole Street boat launching patrons be able to walk to the
restaurant without difficulty. The bait house operator currently manages use of the
parking spaces and launch permits at the Seminole Street boat launching facility.
Patrons pay a fee to launch their boats.
Don Harrill, representative, reviewed the project. He said the applicant has spent
significant time discussing the development with neighbors of the site. The December 7,
2000 letter from Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association President Jeffrey
McKinney endorses the development. He said the applicant discussed concerns with
the Morgan family, the neighbor to the north. He said the applicant is willing to add to
staff’s recommended conditions, conditions agreed to by the Morgans and the applicant.
Mr. Harill said the restaurant will be constructed after SunCruz operations are
curtailed. While their lease expires in August 2001, SunCruz may claim a right to a 2-
year extension. The applicant is reviewing this issue. Mr. Harill said the building
between Osceola and Ft. Harrison will be renovated into a 4,500 square-foot
mcd1200 18 12/12/00
professional office building. He agreed with to staff’s recommendation to close the
property’s curb cut on Ft. Harrison. In response to a question, he said little pedestrian
activity is anticipated. He said the applicant is in discussion with the City to manage the
Seminole Street boat launching property as a joint use. He stated while most boat ramp
patrons use parking spaces during the day, many restaurant patrons dine after dark.
Discussion ensued regarding the additional conditions proposed. Ms. Dougall-
Sides recommended the CDB not include a condition based on a private agreement
between the Morgans and the applicant regarding landscaping. Ed Armstrong,
representative for the Morgans, stated he will work with the applicant regarding this
issue and did not object to its deletion.
In response to a question, Mr. Stone said Marinas are a permitted use in a
Preservation district. He said many marinas in Pinellas County feature restaurants,
which depend on the marinas’ ambiance. The majority of the facility will be on land. He
would not recommend this use outside a marina setting. It was felt the proposed project
is extremely creative and will resurrect a troubled piece of property, positively impacting
the neighborhood.
Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to approve a flexible development to
increase the height of attached dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet, reduce the north side
setback from 10 feet to 3 feet, and permit a non-residential parking lot within the MDR
District, with a Comprehensive Landscape Program at J.A. Gorra's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3,
Sue Barco Sub, Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23, and F.T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10 & triangle
land to west with conditions; 1) submit building permit for either attached dwellings or
restaurant within two years of site plan approval; 2) replace chain link fence along south
property line with decorative fence to include masonry columns & metal grills; 3) install
gate along south property line to prevent restaurant patrons from parking on Seminole
Boat Ramp property; 4) remove curb cut along west side of Ft. Harrison Avenue and
reflect change on revised site plan; 5) integrate/coordinate all signage with building
architecture & limit all freestanding signs to monument-style signs; 6) architecturally
coordinate final design of all new buildings to be consistent with conceptual elevations
as submitted; 7) provide emergency access to south/west of proposed restaurant/retail
buildings to satisfaction of Fire Marshall, prior to issuance of building permits; 8) remove
cover for boat slips along marina’s east end prior to obtaining any building permits for
attached dwellings; 9) orient balconies and views from northernmost bank of
condominium units toward northwest; 10) limit extension of condominium building line
adjacent to residential properties to the north farther east than what is generally shown
on submitted sketch; 11) do not locate air conditioners or mechanical equipment along
northern & eastern property lines of subject property with preference to locate on roof;
motion
12) forbid outdoor live music or outdoor speakers at proposed restaurant. The
was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve, Johnson, Moran, Petersen, and Plisko and
carried
Acting Chair Mazur voted “Aye”; Chair Figurski abstained. Motion .
ITEM E – DIRECTORS ITEMS
mcd1200 19 12/12/00
Mr. Stone indicated a large number of items are scheduled for January, including
a rezoning request for the Connelly property, adjacent to Bayview, and a presentation on
Beach by Design.
Board Member Comments
Members thanked Member Moran for coordinating today’s Holiday Luncheon.
In January, members will elect a Chair and Vice-Chair.
Concern was expressed audience members in the rear of Chambers cannot hear
the discussion. It was recommended the City Commission install better speakers. City
Clerk Cyndie Goudeau stated previous efforts to improve the room’s acoustics have not
been successful. Staff will review this problem.
In regard to surveys submitted with applications, concern was expressed
discrepancies exist between the survey submitted for Item #D8 and the site plan
drawing. Ms. Fierce said staff will review the handling of surveys. She noted sealed
versions are not forwarded to board members. It was suggested 25 year-old surveys
may no longer by accurate. Mr. Stone said staff will review all items submitted with
applications and report suggestions to the board.
Happy Holidays!!!!
ITEM F - ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 4:51 p.m.
mcd1200 20 12/12/00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: December 12,2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
John & Cathie Shaw - 2217 South Lagoon Circle - ANX 00-08-22
yes ~ no
,
Phuoc Thanh Nguyen - 3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
.......'
" yes no
"
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexiou -7 Rockaway St. - FL 00-07-29
~ yes no
1. wa~ xeth Wilson - 3042 Geiger Conrt - FL 00-10-36
yes no
Lawrence Boone - 3164 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-38
X yes no
JoseRh,Patty - 1931 Oak Ridge Court - FL 00-10-39
/\ yes no
John Breen - 3261 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-41
~ yes no
Glenl! Warren -105 South Myrtle Avenue - FL 00-10-48
;J yes no
La caJr Holding Co.-1426 McMullen Booth Rd. - FL 00-10-40
, :' yes no
Dunn & Boyce -14 S. Evergreen Avenue - FL 00-10-37
X yes no
I
Seydo ~tydi -1825 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-10-47
~ yes no
Jim DXIncorp. - 880,900 & 908 N. Osceola Ave. - FL 00-10-46
yes no
oj.
!i
/ /, . ,"
tV.;,,? ":'," ,.,F
~,7-/'.. ,it)';;:!
Date'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: December 12, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
John & Cathie Shaw - 2217 S\jIth Lagoon Circle - ANX 00-08-22
yes ~ no
Phuoc Thanh Nguyen - 3006 ulfto Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes no
Ypapanti & Sevasti A1exiou -~ROCkaway St. - FL 00-07-29
yes no
Warren & Beth Wilson - 3042 Geiger Court - FL 00-10-36
yes X. no
Lawrence Boone - 3164 San ~dro Street - FL 00-10-38
yes no
Joseph Patty -1931 Oak Rid~ Court - FL 00-10-39
yes no
John Breen - 3261 San Pedr~ !,treet - FL 00-10-41
yes J( no
,
Glenn Warren - 105 South ~~t1e Avenue - FL 00-10-48
yes --ll no
,
La Canada Holding Co.-1426 McMullen Booth Rd. - FL 00-10-40
yes ~ no
,
Dunn & Boyce -14 S. Evergreen Avenue - FL 00-10-37
yes '" no
Seydo Kurdi - 1825 Gulfto ~ Blvd. - FL 00-10-47
yes no
Jim Dan Incorp. - 880, 900 ~8 N. Osceola Ave. - FL 00-10-46
yes no
,Vi a/fJlJ
Date
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: December 12, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
John & Cathie Shaw - 2217 South Lagoon Circle - ANX 00-08-22
yes v no
Phuoc Thanh Nguyen - 3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes ~ no
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexiou - 7 Rockaway St. - FL 00-07-29
~ yes no
Warren & Beth Wilson - 3042 Geiger Court - FL 00-10-36
~ yes no
Lawrence Boone - 3164 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-38
y~ ~ no
Joseph Patty - 1931 Oak Ridge Court - FL 00-10-39
yes :7 no
John Breen - 3261 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-41
yes ~ no
Glenn Warren - 105 South Myrtle Avenue - FL 00-10-48
yes ,/ no
La Canada Holding Co.-1426 McMullen Booth Rd. - FL 00-10-40
V-- yes no
Dunn & Boyce -14 S. Evergreen Avenue - FL 00-10-37
yes ~ no
Seydo Kurdi -1825 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-10-47
~ yes no
Jim Dan Incorp. - 880, 900 & 90.8 N. Osceola Ave. - FL 00-10-46
yes ~ no
~~, C ~\:RvJ
Signature
12...--ll- 00
Date
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: December 12, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
John & Cathie Shaw - 2217 South Lagoon Circle - ANX 00-08-22
yes )\ no
Phuoc Thanh Nguyen - 3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
X yes no
.
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexiou - 7 Rockaway St. - FL 00-07-29
K yes no
Warren & Beth Wilson - 3042 Geiger Court - FL 00-10-36
yes K no
Lawrence Boone - 3164 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-38
yes ~ no
.
Joseph Patty - 1931 Oak Ridge Court - FL 00-10-39
yes f... no
John Breen - 3261 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-41
yes ~ no
Glenn Warren - 105 South Myrtle Avenue - FL 00-10-48
)( yes no
.
La Canada Holding Co.-1426 McMullen Booth Rd. - FL 00-10-40
yes ,?\ no
Dunn & Boyce -14 S. Evergreen Avenue - FL 00-10-37
yes X no
Seydo Kurdi -1825 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-10-47
'\I... yes no
.
Jim Dan Incorp. - 880,900 & 908 N. Osceola Ave. - FL 00-10-46
yes :x no
IZ- /2,-00
Date
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: December 12, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
John & Cathie Shaw - 2217 South Lagoon Circle - ANX 00-08-22
yes / no
Phuoc Thanh Nguyen - 3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes v' no
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexiou - 7 Rockaway St. - FL 00-07-29
yes/ no
/
Warren & Beth Wilson - 304~ &eiger Court - FL 00-10-36
yes v1 no
Lawrence Boone - 3164 San PelJto Street - FL 00-10-38
yes vi no
Joseph Patty -1931 Oak Rid~ourt - FL 00-10-39
yes no
John Breen - 3261 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-41
yes \ /' no
Glenn Warren - 105 South Mryd~ Avenue - FL 00-10-48
yes no
La Canada Holding Co.-1426 McMullen Booth Rd. - FL 00-10-40
yes V' no
Dunn & Boyce -14 S. Evergree1venue - FL 00-10-37
yes . no
v
Seydo Kurdi -1825 Gulf to Bajlvd. - FL 00-10-47
yes , no
-
Jim Dan Incorp. - 880,900 & 'N. Osceola Ave. - FL 00-10-46
yes no
..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: December 12, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
John & Cathie Shaw - 2217 South J6agoon Circle - ANX 00-08-22
yes ~ no
Phuoc Thanh Nguyen - 3006 Gulf to Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes ,/ no
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexiou - 7 ~away S1. - FL 00-07-29
yes no
Warren & Beth Wilson - 3042 Geiger Court - FL 00-10-36
yes V no
Lawrence Boone - 3164 San Pedro Street - FL 00-10-38
yes ( / no
-
Joseph Patty - 1931 Oak Ridge Court - FL 00-10-39
yes V no
John Breen - 3261 San Pedro St7t - FL 00-10-41
yes no
Glenn Warren - 105 South Myrtle Avenue - FL 00-10-48
yes vi no
La Canada Holding Co.-1426 McMullen Booth Rd. - FL 00-10-40
yes ~ no
Dunn & Boyce -14 S. Evergreew:Avenue - FL 00-10-37
yes vr no
Seydo Kurdi - 1825 Gulfto BaA - FL 00-10-47
yes no
-
Jim Dan Incorp. - 880, 900 & 908 N. Osceola Ave. - FL 00-10-46
yes no
1>-);2-J~
Date / I