11/21/2000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
November 21, 2000
Present: Gerald Figurski Chair – arrived 2:27 p.m.
Edward Mazur, Jr. Vice Chair – departed 2:17 p.m.
William Johnson Board Member
Shirley Moran Board Member
Carlen A. Petersen Board Member
Alex Plisko Board Member
Absent: David Gildersleeve Board Member
Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney
Ralph Stone Planning Director
Cynthia Hardin Assistant Planning Director
Lisa L. Fierce Development Review Manager
Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the
Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
ITEM A - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE/RECONSIDERATION
FL 00-08-32443 East Shore Drive LUZ 00-08-10 1106
Cases: – (Portofino Village); –
Druid Road South ANX 00-08-202217 South Lagoon Circle
(Chapman); and -
(Shaw)
Development Review Manager Lisa Fierce reviewed the requests for
continuance.
Member Johnson moved to continue Case FL 00-08-32 at 443 East Shore Drive
and Case LUZ 00-08-10 at 1106 Druid Road South to a date uncertain; and to continue
motion
Case ANX 00-08-20 at 2217 South Lagoon Circle to December 12, 2000. The
carried
was duly seconded and unanimously.
ITEM B - CONTINUED ITEMS
- See Item #D4, page 9.
ITEM C – LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS
Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan 2000 Update:
Item #C1 – Planning Department
- Applicant, Request recommendation for approval of update to 1993 Downtown
Clearwater Periphery Plan.
Senior Planner Gina L. Clayton reviewed the request. In 1993, the Clearwater
City Commission approved the Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan, which included
extensive revisions to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Periphery Plan
considers the development potential of four areas on the edge of downtown identified as
mcd1100 1 11/21/00
important to the success of overall downtown redevelopment. These areas are the
“Northwest,” “Southwest,” Northeast,” and Southeast” expansion areas.
The Northwest area is bound by Clearwater Harbor, Nicholson Street, the Pinellas
Trail/Myrtle Avenue, and Jones Street. The Southwest area is bound by South Fort
Harrison Avenue, Chestnut Street, the Pinellas Trail/East Avenue, and Druid Road.
In addition to the Periphery Plan, the Commission also adopted ordinances,
which changed the Future Land Use Map designation of each expansion area to Central
Business District (CBD). The Northeast and Southeast areas were rezoned later in
1993 to Urban Center.
In 1995, the City submitted the amendments to the Future Land Use Map and
Periphery Plan to the PPC (Pinellas Planning Council) and Countywide Planning
Authority. The agencies approved the Plan, including the re-designation of the
expansion areas to CBD with the condition that the City would submit a specific plan that
fully qualifies for CDB designation.
The Downtown Periphery Plan 2000 Update revises the original Periphery Plan.
Its purpose is to better define the land use plan and development potential for each
expansion area and provide recommendations to guide redevelopment. The Update
shall supersede the original plan and fulfill the requirements of a Special Area Plan for
the Countywide Planning Authority. The future land use plan categories for these areas
will remain CBD and the Periphery Plan 2000 Update and Downtown (D) zoning district
will govern the development potential.
In response to a question, Ms. Clayton said the update affects all four areas.
The following item supports amending the zoning for the Northwest and Southwest
areas. She reviewed which nonconforming uses would result from a change in zoning.
Planning Director Ralph Stone stated staff had sent notice to all property owners
in the periphery area and invited them to attend the October 12, 2000 public workshop.
In response to a question, Mr. Stone said some people had expressed concern that
heavy industrial uses not be allowed. All properties would be subject to reconstruction
limits of 50% of the property’s value should disaster strike. If repair costs are greater
than permitted, the structure and use would have to conform to Code.
A resident of the Southwest Area opposed proposed limits for retail sales to
properties fronting Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Mr. Stone requested the CDB (Community Development Board) to determine if
the periphery areas are appropriate for inclusion in downtown. The alternative would be
to perpetuate the current mix of uses. In response to a question, Assistant City Attorney
Leslie Dougall-Sides said if approved, the City Commission would codify the Periphery
Plan as an ordinance.
Member Johnson moved for the CDB to recommend approval of the Downtown
Clearwater Periphery Plan 2000 Update to update the 1993 Downtown Clearwater
motion carried
Periphery Plan. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
mcd1100 2 11/21/00
Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan - Northwest Expansion Area
Item #C2 –
between Clearwater Harbor, Myrtle Street/Pinellas Trail, Nicholson Street, and
Jones Street and Southwest Expansion Area, between South Fort Harrison Avenue,
Chestnut Street, the Pinellas Trail/East Avenue, and Druid Road: Planning
Department - Applicant, Request recommendation for approval of the Northwest
Z 00-10-01
Expansion Area as part of the 2000 Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan.
Ms. Clayton reviewed the request. In 1993, the City Commission approved the
Downtown Periphery Plan, which governs four expansion areas on the edge of
downtown. Although outside the CRA (Community Redevelopment Area), the
Commission had specified detailed zoning and redevelopment concepts for these areas.
In 1993, the City changed the use designation within the four expansion areas to
Central Business District. In 1995, the PPC (Pinellas Planning Council) and
Countywide Planning Authority approved the Future Land Use Map amendments.
Shortly after the plan was approved, the Northeast expansion area was rezoned to
Urban Center (Transition) and the Southeast area was rezoned to Urban Center
(Eastern). No zoning changes were planned immediately for the Northwest and
designated areas, however, staff had drafted a new performance, zoning district to
govern these areas. The Periphery Plan appendix included this proposed zoning district.
Current zoning in the Northwest Expansion Area ranges from Medium Density
Residential to Industrial, Research and Technology. While the Southwest Area is zoned
Commercial and Office, the only zoning district consistent with the underlying Future
Land Use Designation of the CBD is Downtown (D). The proposed rezoning of these
two areas will fulfill the intent of the Periphery Plan and reach consistency between the
City’s zoning map and the Future Land Use Map.
Member Johnson moved for the CDB to recommend approval of the rezoning for
the Northwest Expansion Area, between Clearwater Harbor, Myrtle Street/Pinellas Trail,
Nicholson Street, and Jones Street, and the Southwest Expansion Area, between South
Fort Harrison Avenue, Chestnut Street, the Pinellas Trail/East Avenue, and Druid Road.
motion carried
The was duly seconded and unanimously.
Assistant Planning Director Cyndi Hardin reported staff would renotice all
property owners in Periphery Plan areas before the City Commission considers this
issue in February 2001.
ITEM D - LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS
27001 US 19N:
Item #D1 - Bellwether Properties of Florida, Ltd./J.C. Penny Co.
Inc./Allied Stores General Real Estate Co./Dillard Dept Store Inc./Sears Roebuck & Co.
– Owner/Applicant, Request amendment to flexible development application conditions
of approval at Sec 30-28-16, M&B's 41.01, 41.02, 41.03, 41.04, 42.01, 42.02 & 42.04.
FL 1999-F-1008
Development Review Manager Lisa Fierce reviewed the request. On June 15,
1999, the CDB approved a Flexible Development application, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, for Countryside Mall (VAR 1999-F-1008).
The approved plan permitted a 73,000 square foot addition to Dillard’s Department Store
and a 73,000 square foot addition to Burdines Department Store. An attached signage
mcd1100 3 11/21/00
proposal for Dillard’s also was approved as part of the application. Approval required a
Comprehensive Landscape Program to exceed standard requirements. Most
landscaping will border the property’s perimeter and entrance drives.
When approving the request, the CDB had imposed conditions: 1) all
landscaping shall be installed as part of Dillard’s expansion, except for interior parking
lot landscaping which may be installed in phases. Completion to be no later than 3
Status – To be
years after issuance of main construction permits for Dillard’s addition.
completed
: 2) final landscape plan shall be submitted within 45 days of development
order approving project. Landscape plan shall include calculations for internal open
space & vehicular use area & other such requirements established in the Code. Status
Completed. Approved by Staff
– : 3) all landscaping areas shall feature shrubs, ground
cover, trees and/or perennial beds, and a year-round maintenance program. Sod shall
Status – Shown on approved Landscape
not be allowed in these landscaping areas.
Plan
: and 4) all trees determined by City Arborist to be declining, dead, or hazardous
shall be removed & replaced tree for tree. Tree removal/replacement shall be
Status – To be completed
accomplished as part of Dillard’s addition construction. .
The applicant had anticipated construction of the Dillard’s addition would
commence in mid 1999, while construction of Burdines would begin 6 months later.
However, Burdines submitted its permit request first. The City received Dillard’s request
for a building permit on January 3, 2000. Based on CDB conditions, completion of
interior landscaping is required by January 3, 2001.
The applicants request to amend a condition of the approval of their Flexible
Development application, stating a time extension is needed due to a change in mall
ownership and problems related to renovating an older building. The request is to
extend the landscape completion date to no later then September 1, 2001. Delaying
installation of the landscaping will be more cost effective than installing it during
construction, which could damage plant material.
The applicants also request extending the time frame required attaining a
Certificate of Occupancy permit, pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Code. The Certificate
of Occupancy for the Dilliard’s addition is required by March 30, 2001. The applicants
request an extension to September 1, 2001 for Burdines and Dilliard’s.
Staff recommends approval of the request to amend VAR 1999-F-1008 Condition
#1 to require completion of all interior and perimeter landscaping in accordance with the
approved landscape plan, with a condition that it be installed with the issuance of the
certificate of occupancy for the latest building expansion (Burdines or Dillard’s), but no
later than September 1, 2001. Should installation of the landscaping not be completed
by that time, the City will agree to accept a bond in the amount of 125% of the value of
landscaping not yet installed. A date for work completion would need to be addressed at
that time.
Staff also recommends extending the time frame requiring a Certificate of
Occupancy for Burdines and Dillard’s to September 1, 2001.
One letter opposed the extension and requested installation of a signal light at
the Summerdale/ SR 580 intersection.
mcd1100 4 11/21/00
Tom Marsicano, representative, reviewed the history of the expansion project.
He said the firm is prepared to bond unfinished landscaping but did not expect that
would be necessary.
Member Johnson moved to approve an amendment to the flexible development
application conditions of approval at Sec 30-28-16, M&B's 41.01, 41.02, 41.03, 41.04,
42.01, 42.02 & 42.04 with condition: landscaping to be installed with issuance of
certificate of occupancy for latest building expansion (Dillard’s or Burdines), but no later
motion carried
than September 1, 2001. The was duly seconded and unanimously.
2104 Wings Way:
Item #D2 - Larry B. & Marcella M. Wing / Scott & Wanda Moeller –
Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval of a Residential Infill Project to
reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet along Wings Way, to reduce the north
side setback from 15 feet to 5 feet and to increase the height from 30 feet to 31 feet, at
FL 00-09-35
Sec 32-28-16, part of M&B 43.06.
Planner Ryan Givens reviewed the request. The 0.5-acre site, at the corner of
Union Street and Wings Way, is heavily wooded with live oaks and is within the newly
platted, six-lot, Whispering Wings subdivision. A 0.25-acre detention basin, on the
southern portion of the lot, serves the entire subdivision. One lot in the subdivision is
developed. The lot to the north is vacant. The applicants propose to construct a 3,000
square-foot, two-story, brick colonial-style house with a 3-car garage on its north side.
The house will be consistent with the size and character of houses proposed for the
subdivision.
The applicants request reducing the north side setback from 15 feet to five feet.
The applicants have designed the house around the natural environment and request
the reduction to save trees and preserve the tree canopy. The detention basin also
constrains the home’s design by reducing the effective lot width to 80 feet and its size to
0.25 acre. Only a portion of the garage will encroach into the side setback. Living areas
will be farther south to establish privacy for the homeowners and future neighbors to the
north. Staff feels the home’s placement is the best possible.
The applicants also propose to install a 5-foot wide sidewalk to connect the front
porch with the driveway. The main porch will have a 25-foot front setback. Also, the
applicants propose for the house to be 31 feet high, one foot above the Code standard
of 30 feet.
In response to a question, Mr. Givens said trees will create a large buffer
between this property and the abutting lot to the north. The proposed variance will not
impact adjacent property owners.
In response to a question, Steve Fowler, representative, said the requests are
based on the location of the trees. As the tree survey is not exact, he needs to
determine the exact layout of the house. The setback from the adjacent property will be
at least 5 feet.
Larry Wing, subdivision owner, said to save as many large oaks as possible, the
purchase agreements for the lots require marked trees to remain untouched. He said
the basin on the subject lot is dry.
mcd1100 5 11/21/00
It was noted a front yard variance is not required for the front door sidewalk. Ms.
Dougall-Sides recommended that issue be deleted from the request.
Member Petersen moved for the CDB to approve the Flexible Development of a
Residential Infill Project to reduce the north side setback from 15 feet to 5 feet and to
increase the height from 30 feet to 31 feet for Sec 32-28-16, part of M&B 43.06. The
motion carried
was duly seconded and unanimously.
The meeting recessed from 2:17 to 2:27 p.m.
7 Rockaway St.:
Item #D3 - Charalampos & Sevasti Alexiou (Kirk Construction) –
Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project to reduce the front setback from 10 feet to 0 feet, reduce the
rear setback from 10 feet to 0 feet and reduce the required number of parking spaces
from 71 spaces to 13 parking spaces, and reduce required number of handicap spaces,
at Sec 32-28-16, part of M&B 43.06.
FL 00-09-35
Planner Mark Parry reviewed the request. The 0.38 acre site, on the south side
of Rockaway Street approximately 500 feet west of Mandalay Avenue, fronts the Gulf of
Mexico and Rockaway Street. The site features a 6,723 square-foot, one-story
restaurant and a one-story, 210 square-foot storage building, which is 3.7 feet from the
south rear property line and 2.5 feet from the east side property line. The restaurant sits
on the rear property line and is 1.7 feet from the front property line. The parking lot, on
the east property line, has 13 parking spaces.
The site is in a desirable commercial neighborhood. The wooden, Florida-
Cracker style structure has a metal roof and sand-colored, stucco siding. The
restaurant’s entrance, a covered, wood deck with ramp on the north side of the building,
encroaches 5.3 feet into the public right-of-way. A partially covered wood deck is
attached to the building, approximately 20 feet from the west property line.
To improve customer service, the business owners wish to expand the restaurant
by adding a 3,487 square-foot, second story with approximately 1,200 square-feet of
open deck and 2,300 square feet of enclosed space. Both sections will accommodate
bar patrons and diners; the enclosed portion will include bar seating. The addition will
accommodate 92 diners and 32 bar patrons and increase the building’s size to 10,210
square-feet and the total number of seats to 372. The applicants also propose to
remove and replace the storage room, which is structurally unsound and unsafe.
The second-floor addition and replaced storage room will not extend farther into
the front or rear setbacks than currently exists and will occupy its current foundation.
The project also will renovate and improve the restaurant’s interior and exterior. The
second-floor addition will enhance the restaurant’s architectural style and feature stucco
walls, decorative railings, and a metal roof. The existing sign will be removed during
construction but later reattached. The applicants have not proposed additional signage.
The applicants request reducing the required front and rear setbacks from 10 feet
to zero feet, the number of required parking spaces from 71 to 13, and the number of
required handicap parking spaces to zero. The City-owned lot, north of the restaurant,
has five handicap spaces. One handicap space is adjacent to the restaurant. The
mcd1100 6 11/21/00
restaurant currently is required to have 47 parking spaces. The proposed addition will
require an additional 24 spaces.
Before the parking analysis was done, staff concurred with its methodology.
Florida Design Consultants has submitted a parking analysis, which includes a survey of
100 Frenchy’s customers, and a parking accumulation study performed on a Friday and
Saturday between 11:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. of Frenchy’s parking lot, Municipal Lots
#36 and 38, on-street parking along Bay Esplanade, on Mandalay Avenue between
Baymont Street and Bay Esplanade and along Rockaway Street.
The study indicated 309 parking spaces are within 1,000 feet of the restaurant
and that at least 45 parking spaces are available within the study area at any given time,
including peak times. The study also indicates that the majority of restaurant patrons
use the City-owned, metered parking immediately to the north. This parking lot serves
beach visitors and patrons of other area businesses. Of the 100 customers surveyed,
49 stated their primary destination was the beach and that eating at Frenchy’s was a
secondary purpose. This data indicate dual reasons for restaurant patrons to visit the
area and that the use of shared parking is valid for this business.
Ed Armstrong, representative of the applicant, said he had discussed this plan
with Harry Cline, representative of the adjacent Clearwater Beach Hotel, to mitigate
concerns. Mr. Cline reported he had agreed to conditions related to the expansion: 1)
addition of restaurant bar & deck to be limited to north half of building; 2) restaurant to
construct a concrete block wall that extends 8 feet above the deck to act as a sound
barrier (not shown on plan); 3) hours of operation for the second floor deck will not
extend later than 10:00 p.m. on weeknights and 11:00 p.m. on weekends; 4) no outside
speakers or live music; 5) lights to be directed away from the hotel; and 6) City to
provide Mr. Cline with copy of site plan for review.
Concern was expressed the proposed wall does not meet code. Steve Klar,
architect of the applicant, said an additional wall will not be constructed. Added height
will be constructed on an existing wall. The elevator is required for compliance with ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act). The bathrooms, on the south side of the second floor,
will be enclosed and buffer noise. A cabana will cover the bar area only.
In response to a question, Mr. Cline said the hotel’s manager would prefer no
nightclub activities occur at the subject property but is willing to make reasonable
concessions. His interest is to protect the guest’s sleep.
One property owner expressed concern regarding the extent of the parking
variance requested and related parking problems, stating the study had occurred on a
weekend when it rained and a football game took place.
Robert Pergolizzi, representative of the applicant, said staff had approved the
methodology used to conduct the study of parking within 1,000 feet of the restaurant,
which was done on August 25 – 26, 2000, between 11:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Mr.
Armstrong stated the LOS (level of service) on Mandalay Avenue is rated “B.” He said
the Code does not recognize a business operating in an area with high pedestrian traffic.
Ms. Hardin said it would be unfair to conduct the study during Spring Break. She said
this action does not preclude the owners of the Palm Pavilion from requesting an
mcd1100 7 11/21/00
expansion, although staff is mindful of the cumulative effects on parking. The City is
working on a new beach plan.
It was noted the disabled parking spaces in the City’s lot are not free. It was
stated variances for handicapped spaces are not permitted. Ms. Hardin said staff will
make sure handicapped spaces on the subject property comply with Federal and State
law.
Concern was expressed the expansion will compound beach parking problems.
It was noted the City had never granted a parking variance this large. It was felt the
request is nor an overuse of the property. It was suggested parking spaces would
turnover more quickly if the restaurant is expanded and patrons are seated sooner. It
was noted beach parking will continue to be difficult until new facilities are constructed.
It was suggested the request will not increase parking problems. In response to a
question, Ms. Hardin said it is natural for businesses in urban settings to count on public
parking.
Member Johnson moved to approve the request for flexible development of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to reduce the front setback from 10 feet to
0 feet, reduce the rear setback from 10 feet to 0 feet and reduce the required number of
parking spaces from 71 spaces to 13 parking spaces, and reduce required number of
handicap spaces to 0, if allowed by law, at Sec 32-28-16, part of M&B 43.06. The
motion
was duly seconded. Members Petersen and Johnson and Chair Figurski voted
“Aye” Members Plisko and Moran voted “Nay.” Member Mazur abstained. Motion
failed
due to required four affirmative votes. Item automatically continued to December
12, 2000.
3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard.:
Item #D4 - Thanh Phuoc & Kimtruc Thi Nguyen –
Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program to operate a nightclub
within the Commercial District, and to reduce the required number of parking spaces
from 20 spaces to 18 parking spaces at Bay View City Sub, Blk 8, Lots 8, 9, 10 & 1/2 of
FL 00-08-33
vac alley on N less Rd. right-of-way on S.
The applicant requested a continuance so request is heard by full board.
Member Johnson moved to continue Case FL00-09-33 to December 12, 2000.
motion carried
The was duly seconded and unanimously.
ITEM E – DIRECTORS ITEMS
Approval of Minutes
Member Johnson moved to approve the minutes of the special meeting of
October 10, 2000 and the regular meeting of October 17, 2000, as recorded and
motion
submitted in written summation to each board member. The was duly seconded
carried
and unanimously.
Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment & Rezoning Cases
mcd1100 8 11/21/00
Ms. Hardin reported the City Commission to hear the rezoning request for the
Connelly property, adjacent to Bayview, on December 12, 2000.
2001 Meeting Schedule
Ms. Fierce distributed the proposed schedule of CDB meetings for 2001.
Consensus was to the December meeting during the second week. It was
recommended the board also consider rescheduling the November meeting.
The 2001 CDB meeting schedule: 1) January 23; 2) February 20; 3) March 20; 4)
April 17; 5) May 15; 6) June 19; 7); July 17; 8) August 21; 9) September 18; 10) October
16; 11) November 13; and 12) December 11, 2001.
Holiday Luncheon/Meeting
The Holiday Luncheon is scheduled for December 12, 2000, at the Harborview
Center at 11:30 a.m. Canned goods and unwrapped toys will be collected for the Officer
Friendly holiday drive.
The CDB meeting will follow at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall.
Appointment of Alternate Board Member
Mr. Stone requested board support of a Code amendment to appoint an alternate
board member to serve when board members are absent. If the full board is present,
the alternate would listen to the meeting. The position would provide experience before
appointment as a permanent member and reduce continuances due to absent members.
Discussion ensued regarding other cities’ boards.
Consensus was to recommend appointment of an alternate board member.
Board Member Comments
It was noted the cell tower, under construction near Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, looks
terrible and does not blend into its surroundings as promised.
It was recommended City applications be heard at the end of the agenda. Mr.
Stone said staff would do that. Today’s items were placed at the beginning of the
agenda as approximately 35 residents had attended the workshop and may have wished
to provide input to the board.
ITEM F - ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 3:24 p.m.
mcd1100 9 11/21/00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 21, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
Thomas Marsicano - 27001 US 19 North - V AR 1999-F-I008
\/ yes no
Scott & Wanda Moeller - 2104 Wings Way - FL 00-09-35
~ yes no
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexion - 7 Rockaway Street - FL 00-07-29
.~ yes no
Thanh Phuoc Ngyuen - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes t./'~ no
~. ~ r~Ss!--
Signature
J-'-U<'~
Date
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 21, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
Thomas Marsicano - 27001 US rorth - V AR 1999-F-1008
yes no
Scott & Wanda Moeller - 2104 }\l'ings Way - FL 00-09-35
yes VI no
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexion - 7 u..6'ckaway Street - FL 00-07-29
yes vr-' no
Thanh Phuoc Ngyuen - 3006 ~-to-Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes no
~~
/ (~ 2 (
__ {)d
Date
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 21, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
Thomas Marsicano - 27001 US 19 North - V AR 1999-F-I008
X yes no
Scott &JYanda Moeller - 2104 Wings Way - FL 00-09-35
,/\ yes no
ypapa.Xi & Sevasti Alexion - 7 Rockaway Street - FL 00-07-29
yes no
Than~huoc Ngyuen - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
. yes no
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 21, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
Thomas Marsicano - 27001 US rorth - VAR 1999-F-I008
yes l no
Scott & Wanda Moeller - 21 04 W"'~s Way - FL 00-09-35
yes ~---l no
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexion -7 IyJckaway Street - FL 00-07-29
yes v' no
Thanh Phuoc Ngyuen - 3006 G/o-Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes I no
-
00.0
Dat
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 21, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
Thomas Marsicano - 27001 U 19 North - V AR 1999-F-1008
yes no
Scott & Wanda Moeller - 2104 Wings Way - FL 00-09-35
yes ~no
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexion - \ Rockaway Street - FL 00-07-29
yes no
Thanh Phnoc Ngynen - 3006 ~If-to-Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes no
11,A, /f/1)
Dale
.
r
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: November 21, 2000
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to all
the properties.
Thomas Marsicano - 27001 US 19 North - V AR 1999-F-1008
yes 'J<-... no
.
Scott & Wanda Moeller - 2104 Wings Way - FL 00-09-35
yes >< no
.
Ypapanti & Sevasti Alexion - 7 Rockaway Street - FL 00-07-29
yes >C no
Thanh Phuoc Ngyuen - 3006 k-lf-to-Bay Blvd. - FL 00-08-33
yes no
II - lr -00
Date