Loading...
10/17/2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER October 17, 2000 Present: Gerald Figurski Chair – arrived 1:11 p.m. Edward Mazur, Jr. Vice Chair – departed 3:06 p.m. David Gildersleeve Board Member William Johnson Board Member Shirley Moran Board Member Alex Plisko Board Member Absent: Carlen A. Petersen Board Member Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Ralph Stone Planning Director Cynthia Hardin Assistant Planning Director Lisa Fierce Development Review Manager Patricia O. Sullivan Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. ITEM A - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE/RECONSIDERATION Case: LUZ 00-08-10 - 1106 Druid Road (Chapman) and Case: FL 00-08-32 – 443 East Shore Drive (Portifino Village) Regarding LUZ 00-08-10, Assistant Planning Director Cyndi Hardin stated this request affects property that has both commercial and residential zoning. Staff must review both zones. The property owner is aware staff is requesting a continuance to November 21, 2000. Regarding FL 00-08-32, Development Review Manager Lisa Fierce said the applicant has requested a continuance to address neighborhood concerns. Member Gildersleeve moved to continue Case LUZ 00-09-10 for 1106 Druid Road to November 21, 2000, and to continue Case FL 00-08-32 for 443 East Shore motion carried Drive to a date uncertain. The was duly seconded and unanimously. ITEM B - CONTINUED ITEMS - None. ITEM C – LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS 107 & 111 McMullen-Booth Road Item #C1 – : Michael A. Ciaramello & Thomas Kelly - Owners/Applicants. Request annexation to the City at M&B’S 21/04 and 21/05 in Section ANX 00-08-19 16, Township 29 south, Range 16 east. mcd10b00 1 10/17/00 Senior Planner Etim Udoh reviewed the request. The owners of the two subject properties request annexation to receive City sewer service. The properties feature a duplex and single family home. The applicants want to redevelop the 0.56-acre properties under Office zoning. Staff recommends approval. Item #C2 includes a companion request Concern was expressed the request is for spot zoning. In response to a question, Mr. Udoh felt the County would approve the change. A church is planned on the west side of the road. It was suggested the proposal would improve control of parking and access. It was felt the change would not conflict with the area’s character. Thomas Kelly, owner/applicant, said McMullen-Booth Road has too much traffic for abutting residential use. Michael Ciaramello, owner/applicant, expressed safety concerns related to children living on a street with excessive traffic. He said he could not attract tenants for his downstairs apartment. In response to a question, Ms. Hardin said staff also had discussed this issue with the owner of the corner property. That owner declined to follow through with the change. Member Johnson moved for the CDB (Community Development Board) to recommend approval to annex the properties to the City at 107 & 111 McMullen-Booth motion carried Road. The was duly seconded and unanimously. 107 & 111 McMullen-Booth Road Item #C2 – : Michael A. Ciaramello & Thomas Kelly - Owners/Applicants. Request Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to R/OL, Residential/Office Limited Category (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single Family District (County) to O, Office District (Clearwater) at M&B’S 21/04 and 21/05 in Section 16, Township 29 south, Range 16 east. LUZ 00-08-09 Mr. Udoh reviewed the request. The owners of the two subject properties request changing the Future Land Use Plan category from Residential Urban to Residential/Office Limited and a Zoning District amendment from Single, Family Residential (R-3)/County to O, Office. The site plan will be subject to the development review process. The application involves two lots and two owners/applicants. The owners plan to redevelop the parcels with two offices. The site is on the east side of McMullen-Booth Road, approximately 200 feet south of Drew Street. Staff recommends approval. Member Johnson moved for the CDB to recommend approval of a Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to R/OL, Residential/ Office Limited Category (Clearwater), and Rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single Family District (County) to O, Office District (Clearwater) at 107 & 111 McMullen-Booth Road. motion carried The was duly seconded and unanimously. 3070 Chesapeake Lane Item #C3 – : City/First Baptist Church – Owner/Applicants. Request Land Use Plan amendment from OS/R, Open Space/Recreation Plan Category to INS Institutional Plan Category; and Rezoning from OS/R, Open Space & Recreation LUZ 00-08-11 District to I, Institutional District at M&B 22/21. mcd10b00 2 10/17/00 Mr. Udoh reviewed the request. The First Baptist Church of Clearwater proposes to construct educational facilities on 11.8 acres at the southwest corner of McMullen- Booth Road and Drew Street. To simplify issues related to the project, the applicant proposes to rezone the 4.9-acre Chesapeake Park, south of the church’s property, to institutional. The active park features a baseball field. The applicant proposes to develop both sites for church related activities. The site plan will be subject to the development review process. The PPC (Pinellas Planning Council) and DCA (Department of Community Affairs) must review this threshold amendment. Staff recommends approval. Larry Ponder, representative, requested approval. Member Johnson moved for the CDB to recommend approval to amend the Land Use Plan from OS/R, Open Space/Recreation Plan Category to INS Institutional Plan Category, and Rezoning from OS/R, Open Space & Recreation District to I, Institutional motion carried District for 3070 Chesapeake Lane. The was duly seconded and unanimously. 2071 Lantana Avenue Item #C4 – : James H. Olson & W. Patricia C. Olson/City of Clearwater - Owner/ Applicants. Request annexation to the City and Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-4, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater) at Lot 8, Block ANX 00-09-13 D, Brooklawn Subdivision. Mr. Udoh reviewed the request. On June 3, 1985, the subject property’s former owner entered into an ATA (Agreement to Annex) with Clearwater to connect to City sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was outside the City’s municipal boundaries and did not meet adjacency requirements for annexation. The agreement’s terms and provisions are binding upon the previous owners, their successors, assigns, or any subsequent owner of this property. James H. and Patricia C. Olson are the current property owners. The City has provided water and sewer services to the property since 1985. The ATA serves as an application to annex when that action is possible. The subject property now is contiguous to the City on the north and east. Staff is initiating this annexation request to comply with ATA terms and conditions. The City is required to provide the property owner with 60 days written notice of its intent to annex the property. The City notified the current property owner of this action on June 28, 2000. The notice expired on August 29, 2000. Upon annexation, the current property owner is required to submit a $400 fee, the property's fair share of its impact on open space. The fee funds maintenance of open space to promote the health, safety and welfare of City residents and is based on the City's Recreation and Open Space impact fee ordinance adopted July 7, 1983. The fee is due on November 1, 2000, prior to adoption of associated ordinances on December 7, 2000. Staff recommends approval. Three people spoke in opposition, expressing concern traffic would increase and stating they did not want to be annexed. It was indicated City street, Evergreen, is in poor condition. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said this action is not related to an outside consultant’s review of City enclaves. mcd10b00 3 10/17/00 Member Johnson moved for the CDB to recommend approval to annex the property into the City, amend the Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater), and Rezoning from R-4, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density motion Residential District (Clearwater) at 2071 Lantana Avenue. The was duly carried seconded and unanimously. 2014 Poinsetta Avenue Item #C5 – : Yanith Kheeng/City of Clearwater Owner/ Applicant. Request annexation to the City and Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-4, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater) at Lot 10, Block 0, Brooklawn Subdivision, less ANX 00-09-14 east 5 feet for road right-of-way. Mr. Udoh reviewed the request. On April 28, 1986, the subject property’s former owner entered into an ATA with Clearwater to connect to City sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was outside the City’s municipal boundaries. Yanith Kheeng is the current property owner. The City has provided water and sewer services to the property since 1986. The subject property now is contiguous to the City on the east. Staff is initiating this annexation request to comply with ATA terms and conditions. The City notified the current property owner of this action on June 28, 2000. The current property owner is required to submit a $200 open space impact fee by November 1, 2000, prior to adoption of associated ordinances on December 7, 2000. Staff recommends approval. Yanith Kheeng, owner, said he had not been informed of the ATA when he purchased the property in 1987. He said he only realized yesterday that the annexation did not affect his entire neighborhood. He opposed the annexation, stating it would not benefit him. It was noted Mr. Kheeng has received City water for many years. Ms. Hardin said City residents do not pay the 25% premium for water paid by County residents. Two people spoke in opposition. Ms. Dougall-Sides stated the impact fee predates the ATA. It was suggested the City Commission consider waiving the fee. Planning Director Ralph Stone stated the City is not pursuing involuntary annexations. This annexation request is based on a previous agreement. Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to recommend approval to annex the property into the City, amend the Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential Urban Classification (Clearwater), and Rezoning from R-4, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density motion Residential District (Clearwater) at 2014 Poinsetta Avenue. The was duly carried seconded and unanimously. It was stated the CDB is making a recommendation only. The first public hearing on this issue is scheduled for the City Commission meeting on November 16, 2000. It was recommended residents discuss their concerns with staff before then. mcd10b00 4 10/17/00 1407 Nursery Road Item #C6 – : Michael & Linda Biros - Owner/ Applicant. Request annexation to City and Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District ANX 00-08-15 (Clearwater) at Lot 11, Suncrest Terrace. Mr. Udoh reviewed the request. The property owners have requested annexation to receive City garbage collection service. The applicants have received City water and sewer services since May 29, 1998. The property features a single-family residence. The property will have a land use plan designation of Residential Low and is proposed to be zoned Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). Staff recommends approval. Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to recommend approval to annex the property into the City, amend the Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-3, Residential, Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential motion District (Clearwater) at 1407 Nursery Road. The was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 1708 East El Trinidad Drive Item #C7 – : Christine L. & Jack L. Thacker/City of Clearwater Owner/ Applicant. Request annexation to City and Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater) at Lot 3, Block 2, Virginia ANX 00-09-17 Grove Terrace. Mr. Udoh reviewed the request. On November 13, 1984, the subject property’s former owner entered into an ATA with Clearwater to connect to City sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was outside the City’s municipal boundaries. Christine L. and Jack L. Thacker are the current property owners. The City has provided water and sewer services to the property since 1984. The subject property now is contiguous to the City on the south. Staff is initiating this annexation request to comply with ATA terms and conditions. The City notified the current property owner of this action on June 28, 2000. The current property owner is required to submit a $200 open space impact fee by November 1, 2000, prior to adoption of associated ordinances on December 7, 2000. The CRT (Community Response Team) reports an inoperative vehicle is on the property, which also is partially overgrown with grass. The CRT will work with the property owner to bring the property into compliance with Code following annexation. Staff recommends approval. It was recommended the action also include annexation of the right-of-way. Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to recommend approval to annex the property into the City, amend the Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single Family District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential mcd10b00 5 10/17/00 motion District (Clearwater) at 1708 E. El Trinidad Drive. The was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 1880 McMullen Booth Road Item #C8 – : RIC Properties Ltd./Judith A. Rogala/City of Clearwater Owner/ Applicant. Request Annexation and Land Use Plan amendment from RS, Residential Suburban (County) to RS, Residential Suburban Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-R, Rural Residential District (County) to LDR, Low Density Residential District (Clearwater) at M&B 32/04 in Section 04, Township 29 ANX 00-09-18 south, Range 16 east. Mr. Udoh reviewed the request. According to Pinellas County records, this site complies with County zoning regulations for use as a day care center. On January 3, 1980, the property owner received preliminary site plan approval for a day care center. On September 19, 1980, the County’s Site Plan Review System approved a final site plan. Its use as a day care center has not changed. On October 10, 1980, the subject property’s former owner entered into an ATA with Clearwater to connect to City sewer and water facilities. At that time, the subject property was outside the City’s municipal boundaries. RIC Properties, Inc. is the current property owner. The City has provided water and sewer services to the property since 1980. The subject property now is contiguous to the City on the south. Staff is initiating this annexation request to comply with ATA terms and conditions. The City notified the current property owner of this action on June 28, 2000. The former property owner previously paid the open space impact fee. Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to recommend approval to annex the property into the City, amend the Land Use Plan amendment from RS, Residential Suburban (County) to RS, Residential Suburban Classification (Clearwater); and Rezoning from R-R, Rural Residential District (County) to LDR, Low Density Residential motion District (Clearwater) at 1880 McMullen Booth Road. The was duly seconded carried and unanimously. ITEM D - LEVEL 2 APPLICATIONS 2189 Springrain Drive Item #D1 – : Jeff Mack - Owner/ Applicant. Request Flexible Development approval of a Residential Infill Project to reduce east rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce south side setback from five feet to 1.8 feet, at Spring Lake of FL 00-08-31 Clearwater, Lot 41. Planner Mark Parry reviewed the request. The 0.15-acre site is in the Spring Lake subdivision. On May 12, 1988, a site plan for the subdivision was certified as a Planned Unit Development. According to the certified site plan, the 2-acre tract immediately east of the subject property will remain undeveloped. The property’s 1,898 square-foot house is approximately 21 feet from the rear property line and 1.8 feet from the south side property line. The two-story house is 25 feet tall and similar to other neighborhood houses. The subdivision’s certified site plan includes several lot types. This site, Lot Type “B,” allows a 2-foot side setback and 10- mcd10b00 6 10/17/00 foot rear setback. Additions are limited to ten feet of depth and a 350 square-foot footprint. This request is to construct a 900-square foot, two-story addition. The screened porch will become part of the home’s interior. The addition will include a first-floor family room and back porch and a second-floor master bedroom. Both floors will feature a bank of windows on the east rear wall. Single windows will be installed on the south wall of both floors. The addition will not extend farther into the rear setback than permitted by the certified site plan and will not extend farther into the south side setback than currently exists. The addition is permitted under terms of the certified site plan. The Code has no provision to modify an approved certified site plan. The applicant’s only option is to request a Residential Infill Project as part of a Flexible Development application. This request is to reduce the required east rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the south side setback from 5 feet to 1.8 feet. Adjacent properties have similar rear and side setbacks. The addition is consistent with the character of the neighborhood and will feature the same architectural elements as currently exist. The DRC (Development Review Committee) reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 7, 2000. Staff recommends approval. Jeff Mack, owner, said he wishes to enlarge his house at the same time he repairs termite damage. Member Johnson moved for the CDB to approve the Flexible Development of a Residential Infill Project to reduce the east rear setback from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the south side setback from five feet to 1.8 feet at 2189 Springrain Drive. The motion carried was duly seconded and unanimously. 1135 Marshall Street Item #D2 – (Cont’d from 09/19/00) : William Roberson - Owner/ Applicant. Request Flexible Development approval of a Residential Infill Project to reduce front setback along Marshall Street from 25 feet to eight feet, reduce front setback on North Madison Avenue from 25 feet to 22.5 feet and reduce minimum lot size FL 00- from 10,000 square feet to 7,022.5 square feet, at Fairmont Sub, Blk G, Lot 1. 08-30 Planner Ryan Givens reviewed the request. The 0.16-acre site, on the corner of Marshall Street and North Madison Avenue, features a 760 square-foot cracker-style house, which is consistent with neighborhood architecture. The home’s stucco siding needs repair and repainting. Double-paned windows are framed with wood. The metal roof appears to be in fair condition. Overall, the home appears to be in poor condition. The house sits on the west side of a sizable lot. The applicant proposes to create a duplex by adding a 988 square-foot unit and two two-car garages, which will be accessed by separate driveways. The additions total 1,788 square-feet. Duplexes are permitted in the MDR district. This request is to reduce the minimum lot area from 10,000 square-feet to 7,022.5 square-feet. The property is across the street from Cherry Harris Park, a well maintained park that serves as a focal point for the North Greenwood neighborhood, mcd10b00 7 10/17/00 which is undergoing revitalization. The neighborhood’s character prevents a reasonable expectation that a larger home ever will be constructed on the large lot. The proposed duplex is an appropriate use. The property has front 25-foot setbacks along the streets. The applicant requests to reduce the setback to 22.5-feet along Madison Avenue and to 8-feet along Marshall Street to accommodate a 3-foot sidewalk to the front door. The main structure will have an 18-foot setback. Most neighborhood homes have 5-foot front setbacks. The site was platted as a separate subdivision. The north property line extends approximately 30 feet farther back than properties to the west. Reducing the front setbacks will provide a uniform pattern for the streetscape and permit flexibility in the site’s design. The DRC (Development Review Committee) reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 7, 2000. Staff recommends approval. Frank Hancock, representative, requested approval. It was recommended the garages be set back from the residential units to improve the building’s aesthetics and add interest to the architecture. The structure will have more than 100 feet of frontage on Marshall Street. Discussion ensued regarding the design. Staff will review the site plan. Member Johnson moved for the CDB to approve the Flexible Development of a Residential Infill Project to reduce the front setback along Marshall Street from 25 feet to eight feet, reduce the front setback on North Madison Avenue from 25 feet to 22.5 feet, and reduce the minimum lot size from 10,000 square feet to 7,022.5 square feet at 1135 motion carried Marshall Street. The was duly seconded and unanimously. 616 E Street Item #D3 – : Cinevision Properties & Scott Hoover – Owner. Devendra N. Amin - Applicant. Request Flexible Development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Project to permit a medical clinic in the IRT District, Medical Clinic site - reduce required parking from 56 spaces to 39 spaces, reduce north rear setback from 20 feet to one foot, reduce east side setback from 20 feet to five feet, Off-site Parking site - permit nonresidential parking lot in MDR District, reduce north front setback from 25 feet to six feet, reduce east side setback from five feet to two feet, reduce south rear setback from 10 feet to four feet, and increase ISR (Impervious Surface Ratio) from 0.65 to 0.69 at Belleair, Blk B, Lots 9-13 & FL 00-07-28 Belleview Court, Blk B, E 50 ft. of Lot 6. Mr. Givens reviewed the request. The proposal includes two parcels on E Street: 1) Parcel A borders a warehouse facility, medical office, general industrial buildings, and is across the street from single-family houses. The site’s 11,200 square-foot masonry building is vacant and 2) Parcel B, southeast of Parcel A at the eastern terminus of E Street, borders the CSX railroad tracks and single-family homes. Parcel B is part of a larger lot that features a single-family house and driveway. The proposal to divide the property is part of a future administrative lot split; the property’s west side will remain single-family and the eastern side will become a parking lot. The site’s eastern portion is covered partly by concrete that is in poor condition, and has a metal shed, a drainage ditch, and over-grown vegetation. The site, created by the vacation of First Avenue West, was deeded to the previous property owner. A lot division is appropriate only upon approval of this application. mcd10b00 8 10/17/00 Parcels A and B are south of downtown in an area with land uses that range from single-family residence, to office, light manufacturing, and warehouse. No transition exists between the more intensive IL, Industrial Limited, on the north to the less intensive RU, Residential Urban, to the south. Current zoning and future land use classification permits expansion of both residential and industrial uses. The application requests changing the use on Parcel A from light manufacturing to medical clinic. While general offices are a permitted use in the IRT District, medical offices are permitted only as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. No modifications are planned for the building’s exterior. The interior will be remodeled to function as a medical clinic. Both parcels are necessary to provide adequate parking. The applicant plans to construct 25 patient/employee parking spaces on Parcel A, and 14 employee only parking spaces on Parcel B. Parcel B will meet Code requirements, including paving, striping, and drainage. The site will feature an ingress/egress easement to allow access to the house to the west. A fire hydrant prevents the drive from being relocated to E Street. Since the IRT District has no minimum parking requirement, staff used an alternative approach and considered Office District standards. Based on 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area, the subject site would be required to have at least 56 spaces. The applicant requests reducing that number to 39. The ITE (International Traffic Engineer) recommends medical clinics have 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area, or 45 spaces for this site. The applicant contends that 39 spaces are adequate for the clinic without negatively impacting surrounding streets and properties. The clinic will employ 20 people, including 9 doctors. Four doctors will use the facility as their primary office. The others will use the building only to perform specialized procedures. Generally, only one doctor at a time will perform procedures. The clinic will operate between 8:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. and expects 50 patient visits daily, or six per hour. At peak times, it is estimated 26 parking spaces will be needed. The DRC (Development Review Committee) reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 7, 2000. Staff recommends approval of the request with conditions: 1) in the event physicians, in excess of nine, are added to the clinic, the clinic will present a revised parking study to the Planning Department; 2) an application for administrative lot division be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit; and 3) and medical waste to be properly secured to prevent exposure of biohazard hazard materials. Concern was expressed medical clinics have greater parking needs than normal offices. Ms. Hardin said this clinic proposes to operate without all physicians present at the same time. Concern was expressed a future buyer would have increased parking needs. Mr. Stone said staff would work with such a property owner to locate additional employee parking at a nearby industrial facility, although success could not be guaranteed. mcd10b00 9 10/17/00 In response to a question, Mr. Givens said a pipe buried under the fill will retain water volume. A retention pond will offset impervious features of the parking lot. City engineers have approved the plan. Betty Hayes, representative, said proposed parking will be adequate. She did not foresee increased parking needs in the future. In response to a question, she said it would be difficult to extend the October 31, 2000 closing date. One resident expressed concern parking from the site not spill over into abutting residential neighborhoods. Discussion ensued regarding ways to control parking issues should related problems occur. It was recommended a condition be imposed regarding parking overflow to be enforced upon City or neighborhood complaint. Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to approve Flexible Development of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with a Comprehensive Landscape Project to permit a medical clinic in the IRT District; Medical Clinic site - reduce required parking from 56 spaces to 39 spaces, reduce north rear setback from 20 feet to one foot, and reduce east side setback from 20 feet to five feet; Off-site Parking site - permit nonresidential parking lot in MDR District, reduce north front setback from 25 feet to six feet, reduce east side setback from five feet to two feet, reduce south rear setback from 10 feet to four feet, and increase the Impervious Surface Ratio from 0.65 to 0.69 at 616 E Street with conditions: 1) in the event physicians, in excess of the nine proposed, are added to the clinic, a revised parking study will be presented to the Planning Department; 2) application for administrative lot division be submitted and approved prior to issuance of building permit; 3) medical waste be properly secured to prevent exposure of biohazard hazard materials; and 4) should site experience excess parking demands beyond parking approved by site plan, the applicant, City, or a neighbor will pursue alternatives to accommodate excess demand and activities generating excess demand motion shall cease until problem is resolved. The was duly seconded. Members Mazur, Gildersleeve, Johnson, and Moran and Chair Figurski voted “Aye”; Member carried Plisko voted “Nay.” Motion . The board recessed from 3:06 to 3:14 p.m. 100 North Greenwood Avenue Item #D4 – : Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. – Owner. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority - Applicant. Request amendment to Flexible Development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit a public transportation facility within the Downtown District and increase the height of a public transportation facility from 10 feet to 36 feet, at R.J. Booth's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-6 and Sarah McMullen's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-10 less FL 00-08-34 road right-of-way. Items #D4 and #D5 were discussed simultaneously. Member Mazur reported he had a conflict of interest related to each item, recused himself, and departed the meeting. Ms. Fierce reviewed the request. The 3.48-acre vacant site fronts Booth and North Greenwood avenues and Grove and Laura streets. The applicant proposes to relocate the PSTA bus station from its site at Pierce Street/ South Garden Avenue. The mcd10b00 10 10/17/00 proposed location is in the Downtown (D) District and is designated as Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential categories in the City’s Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Plan does not permit public transportation facilities at this site The applicant indicates PSTA, Greyhound Lines, and taxi/limousine services will share the 7,200 square-foot, 36-foot high bus terminal. Stormwater retention facilities will be on the site’s northwest corner. Lot access will be via ingress/egress points on Grove Street for automobiles only, and North Greenwood and Booth avenues for buses only. Two curb cuts on Booth Avenue are planned: 1) north curb cut limited to egress and 2) south curb cut limited to ingress. The terminal is to be centered on the site with circulation around the perimeter. As designed, turning movements will be awkward and several vehicle conflict points will exist. From Greenwood Avenue, buses would enter the site and turn left. From Booth Avenue, buses would enter and turn left, circle the building, and potentially cross the paths of exiting buses. A taxi stand is proposed on the south side of Grove Street. The proposed bus terminal would operate similarly to the current station with hours from 5:20 a.m. to 10:20 p.m., Monday through Saturday, and from 7:00 a.m. to 9:15 p.m. on Sunday. Greyhound services will operate less frequently. It is proposed that buses will depart within 10 minutes of arrival. While the terminal will be intensely active every hour, intense activity also will occur every half-hour during peak times. No more than four employees will work at a time, including three bus station employees and a security guard after dark. This request is for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit a public transportation facility within the Downtown District and increase the height of the terminal building from 10 feet to 36 feet. The current PSTA terminal experiences significant crime and security problems. Police Department records for 1997 to 1999 indicate the site averaged 292 annual calls for service. Through September 2000, the Police Department recorded 248 calls for onsite service, averaging 27 calls per month. Recorded calls were 9-1-1, drunkenness, theft, battery, domestic violence, trespassing, fighting, etc. Staff is concerned crime and security problems related to the facility would impact negatively on the new site and surrounding neighborhood. Staff feels the proposal does not comply with standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval or a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The plan conflicts with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, will discourage appropriate nearby development, and will not enhance the area or City as a whole. The DRC (Development Review Committee) reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 7, 2000. Staff recommends denial. In response to a question, Alan Zimmet, representative, stated PSTA (Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority) has condemnation authority but does not plan to exercise that privilege. In response to questions from Mr. Zimmet, Ms. Fierce said the applicant had not requested staff to research another location. She felt more appropriate sites exist downtown and suggested passengers could transfer on street at bus stops. Mr. Zimmet said former City Manager Mike Roberto had recommended the subject site. He mcd10b00 11 10/17/00 said PSTA cannot expand its current location. It was suggested nearby buildings could be razed to allow expansion. Mr. Zimmet stated the City Commission had voted against pursuing a joint project with PSTA at its current site on April 15, 1999. He said the proposed site is surrounded mostly by office and commercial uses. He said the only recent construction in the area has been for a storage facility and Walgreens. He said staff had misrepresented telephone calls from the terminal to the Police Department, stating many calls were hang-ups. In response to a question, Ms. Fierce said staff was concerned criminal activities would follow the bus terminal to its new location. In response to questions from Mr. Zimmet, Ms. Hardin said PSTA’s current site is preferable to the proposed location, which would be underutilized as it is too large for the terminal’s needs. Staff evaluated downtown companies with high employee ridership and found the proposed site would be inconvenient. She said the intent of the town pond is to attract private investment and residential development. Several planned downtown projects have been delayed. The City Commission had voted to change the site of the new library from the town pond to the bluff. Plans for the traffic circle off Greenwood were eliminated previously. PSTA submitted a copy of Clearwater’s 1995 Downtown Redevelopment Plan 1995 and the related movement goal, a copy of adjacent land uses, a copy of police codes and calls from the current terminal, and current Park Street terminal platform assignments. Roger Sweeney, PSTA Executive Director, submitted the March 17, 2000 letter from Donald Alford of the Atlanta Office of Operation and Program Management of USDOT (U. S. Department of Transportation) to PSTA, which stated that related environmental requirements and concerns had been satisfied and that PSTA could proceed with the property’s purchase with local funds. He said USDOT’s approval of the subject site for the facility supports that location. Mr. Zimmet said USDOT had studied surrounding uses but had not contacted local government regarding this issue. Mr. Sweeney reviewed growth of the current bus terminal since its dedication in 1983. While the facility was designed for 8 buses, as many as 13 buses use the facility at one time, forcing overflow buses into metered parking spaces on Garden and Park. Passengers are forced to walk on the grass. He submitted seven photographs of crowded conditions at the bus terminal. He said the facility is not the primary destination for most passengers, who transfer to other buses. He noted the Scientologists have their own transportation system and do not use PSTA. He said a new facility requires at least 2 acres. He said the proposed facility, designed with 16 slots, will be aesthetically landscaped. He said traffic circulation will be safe. He said the location is convenient for passengers. In response to a question, he said PSTA has an on-street facility at Williams Park in St. Petersburg and is constructing a terminal near the stadium. Discussion ensued regarding bus service to Williams Park. He said historically, bus terminals are located in downtowns. As most riders use the terminal to transfer, it was suggested a more appropriate location would be closer to the center of the City near Hercules. Mr. Sweeney said 14 bus routes converge downtown. That is not the case in central Clearwater. mcd10b00 12 10/17/00 Mr. Sweeney said PSTA began looking for property in Clearwater’s downtown in 1996-97. Expanding the current 2-acre site would be tight and could not provide retention or some amenities. Ms. Hardin indicated that location is eligible for participation in the Town Pond. In response to a question, Mr. Sweeney reviewed properties the PSTA, with the help of its realtor, had considered for a terminal site. He said the PSTA had obtained federal funding for a joint project with the City at the current site but the City Commission had voted against committing to the project. In response to a question, he estimated Greyhound will represent less than 5% of the terminal’s use, with only 2 or 3 trips daily. st Calvin Harris, PSTA Board of Directors, said Clearwater citizens deserve a 21 century transportation system. He noted a junior and senior high school were the last structures that occupied the subject property. He said the location would be convenient to under-served North Greenwood residents. He said the location is close to the 1100 Building, which houses many governmental offices. He said residents could put their bicycles on buses for transport to the beach. In response to a question, he stated passengers are marked for criminal activities but do not cause it. A copy of Robert C. Pergolizzi’s resume was distributed. Mr. Pergolizzi, of PSTA, reviewed uses surrounding the proposed site and stated the property is not well suited for residential development. He said the project would feature 59% open space and is consistent with downtown plan goals. He said the project meets the City’s movement goal by providing a single location for PSTA, Greyhound, taxicabs, and vehicle pickup. He said the current site could be used for a park or for parking to help meet downtown’s 1,100-space deficiency. He said downtown residential development is best located upstairs from retail uses. He said the state of the art facility will be centrally located between the downtown entryways of Drew and Cleveland streets. He said staff’s report is based on partial information and speculation. He agreed Clearwater’s location away from interstate highways is a disadvantage. Planning Director Ralph Stone said the development of residential properties on the subject site will be the keystone for future downtown development of retail, office, and entertainment venues. He said the terminal would negatively impact residents and residential development. In response to a question, Mr. Pergolizzi said internal signage could alleviate traffic conflicts within the proposed facility. Concern was expressed the project would impact the nearby condominium project. Mr. Pergolizzi said a parking lot and right-of- way provide sufficient separation between the proposed terminal and residential project. He said the retention pond on the west end of the site will provide a substantial buffer. The meeting recessed from 4:57 to 5:05 p.m. Ed Armstrong, representing the property owner, expressed concern denial of this use would be an inverse condemnation. Mr. Stone said staff would evaluate another use with an open mind. A copy of Richard S. Bacon’s resume was distributed. Mr. Bacon, representative, said PSTA can control the safety and security of transferring passengers mcd10b00 13 10/17/00 by keeping them in the center of the facility. Vehicular parking will be limited. He said the new facility will be safer than the current one as passengers will not cross bus paths. Upon staff’s recommendation, the taxi stand will be off-site with direct access from the terminal. Pedestrians will be able to enter the facility from two locations. The building will be located on the eastern side of the property. The proposal will meet or exceed costly City landscape requirements and will feature a tree buffer to aid acoustics. The project will only remove trees as recommended by staff. Mr. Sweeney said most buses will exit onto Greenwood. A few will exit onto Booth, travel south to Laurel, and west to Myrtle Avenue. In response to a question, Mr. Bacon said no parking is planned for Greyhound passengers. Riders must be dropped off on the street. He said increasing public access would hurt the plan. Mr. Bacon said the height variance requested is necessary for bus clearance. An enclosed central lobby with a ticket booth will serve all passengers. The design is contemporary and will use materials that are easy to maintain. The facility will be well lit for security purposes. The landscape plan also will consider security. He anticipated the facility will meet passenger needs for the next 20 years. Concern was expressed elderly Greyhound passengers will have difficulty accessing the facility. It was noted passengers can be dropped off at the door of the current facility on SR 60. Mr. Sweeney said Greyhound was comfortable with the design. Greyhound and PSTA schedules do not conflict. He said the project is similar to one under construction in Ft. Myers. Ms. Hardin said the facility will offer no parking for anyone but employees. Mr. Bacon estimated 6 staff members will work at the facility. He said access to the 11- space parking lot will be controlled. Mr. Sweeney said some spaces will be used for driver vehicles when they provide relief for other PSTA drivers. Ms. Hardin indicated no parking will be provided for residents who wish to drop off packages for Greyhound transport. Mr. Zimmet distributed a copy of federal regulations regarding environmental impact and related procedures and 2 years of Police Department records listing calls from the main library. He said the number of calls is similar to those received from the bus terminal. Six people spoke against the project, stating the terminal would lower property values and the quality of life, noise levels and diesel pollution would increase substantially, buses would impact residential corridors and endanger children, the proposal does not fit the downtown plan, parking is needed, and criminal activity will occur. It was stated amending the comprehensive plan is much more significant than a simple rezoning request. Six letters of opposition were received from neighboring properties. Louise Cournoyer, representing the Laurel Street Townhomes said one sale contract was canceled due to this plan. She submitted a copy of the Laura Street Townhomes brochure, a purchase agreement form, and a declaration of covenants conditions and restrictions. Ms. Hardin said when the town pond was zoned, staff was not certain of its exact location. It currently is zoned for mixed use. The Walgreens and storage unit did not require plan amendments, as the property was zoned mixed use. Mr. Stone said staff is mcd10b00 14 10/17/00 responsible for balancing competing interests. He said residential development is an essential ingredient to the successful redevelopment of downtown. Mr. Zimmet said the project would reinvest federal dollars in the downtown infrastructure. He said telephone calls to the Police Department do not prove criminal activity. He said the proposal does not require DCA approval. He said the City has not begun to implement its downtown plan. He said the location would serve those without alternative transportation. It was felt changes related to the construction of IMR were logical. Concern was expressed the terminal is not a good fit for the residential neighborhood. The importance of downtown housing was stated. Concern was expressed the terminal lacks access for its Greyhound operation. It was felt the City’s plan was well considered and should not be changed incrementally. Opposition to the proposed site was stated. Member Gildersleeve moved for the CDB to deny the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit a public transportation facility at 100 North Greenwood motion Avenue. The was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve, Johnson, Moran, and carried Plisko and Chair Figurski voted “Aye”; Member Mazur abstained. Motion . 100 North Greenwood Avenue Item #D5 – : Trust for Rehabilitation and Nurturing Youth and Families, Inc. – Owner. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority - Applicant. Request amendment to Clearwater Redevelopment Plan from Low Density Residential and Medium/High Density Residential Categories to Public/Government Category at R.J. Booth's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-6 and Sarah McMullen's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-10 less road right- CRA 00-09-01 of-way. Discussion of this item is reported under Item #D4, on page 13. Ms. Hardin reviewed this request to amend the Downtown Redevelopment Plan to allow PSTA to relocate its Pierce Street/Garden Avenue terminal to 100 North Greenwood Avenue. The Community Development Code defines a bus terminal as a public transportation facility, which must be designated as a Public/Governmental use category in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Redevelopment Plan designates the proposed site as Low and Medium/High Residential land use categories and does not permit a bus terminal. The plan category, CBD (Central Business District) in Countywide Plan Rules, permits municipalities to designate urban center boundaries, prepare specific CBD plans, and allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other parts of the City. In the first downtown plan, created in 1976, Clearwater indicated downtown is an urban center and the City’s principal activity center. Since then, many downtown plans have been created. In 1995, the City adopted the current “Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan,” which established: 1) People Goal - encourage residents to relocate downtown, downtown employment, convenient transportation & parking, & a link between downtown, the City, & the beach; 2) Movement Goal - encourage development of efficient, high quality, multi-modal transportation system with terminal & transition facilities for all modes. This goal would reduce reliance on automobiles by expanding transit’s role downtown & to improve the PSTA facility’s design; 3) Activity Goal - support mcd10b00 15 10/17/00 development of activity centers necessary for a 24-hour downtown; 4) Amenity Goal - support creating & enhancing small town center downtown with quality of life that attracts & sustains diverse experiences. This goal encourages creation of the town pond for a park & stormwater retention as a catalyst for area residential development; and 5) Opportunity Goal – encourage attracting to downtown investment of time, money, resources & creativity to enhance Clearwater’s value, tax base, image & quality of life. This goal supports key downtown development parcels through the private market & encourages public investment in downtown amenities. Staff feels the proposed amendment is inconsistent with all of these goals. The subject site is far from major downtown employers, the center of downtown, and parking garages, which could link downtown with destinations such as the beach. The site’s location will not attract new passengers. While linkage with Greyhound Bus would be positive, the location would discourage its use by downtown passengers. The site is surrounded by homes. New residential development is immediately west of the site and new townhouses are planned nearby. This site is a prime location for residential uses, is within walking distance of the town pond, and could serve as downtown’s northern residential anchor. A bus terminal would introduce a negative commercial use into this residential redevelopment area and intrude into the surrounding neighborhood via three local residential streets. The use, design, and operational characteristics of a bus terminal are inconsistent with the area’s residential character. The public investment would not encourage an active vibrant downtown nor add value to downtown amenities. Secondary impacts, such as crime, noise, and pollution, would discourage residential redevelopment and impact negatively on the quality of life for City residents and business owners. Amending the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan is a significant action with impacts beyond the subject property. A bus terminal could have a positive effect on downtown if its location is integrated with downtown land uses, it is convenient for its passengers, and off-site impacts such as noise and air pollution are minimized. The proposed site does not support the City’s downtown land use pattern nor does it provide the synergistic effects that a well located transit facility could offer to major downtown employers. The site is a prime residential development parcel that is close to the town pond and its park amenity. Staff recommends denial. Item #D4 is a companion request Member Johnson moved for the CDB to deny the amendment to Clearwater motion Redevelopment Plan for 100 North Greenwood Avenue. The was duly seconded. Members Gildersleeve, Johnson, Moran, and Plisko and Chair Figurski voted carried “Aye”; Member Mazur abstained. Motion . ITEM E– DIRECTOR’S ITEMS Update of annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning cases. – None. ITEM F - ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:28 p.m. mcd10b00 16 10/17/00 ~ '. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: October 17, 2000 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00-08-19) ~yes no Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (LUZ 00-08-09) )<.. yes no City of Clearwater/First Baptist Church, 3070 Chesapeake Lane (LUZ 00-08-11) " -?< yes no Olson & W. Patricia C. /City of Clearwater, 2071 Lantana Avenue (ANXOO-09-13) ,x yes no Kheang/City of Clearwater, 2014 Poinsetta Avenue (ANX 00-09-14) -L-yes no Michael & Linda Biros, 1407 Nursery Road (ANX 00-08-15) , ,I "-.. yes no Thacker/City of Clearwater, 1708 E EI Trinidad Drive (ANX 00-09-17) (< yes no " RIC Properties/J. Rogala/City of Clearwater, 1880 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00- 09-18) '< yes no Jeff Mack, 2189 Springrain Drive (FL 00-08-31) '\ yes no William Roberson, 1135 Marshall Street (FL 00-08-30 )( yes no Cinevision Pr.K~e i~ ~d Scott Hoover, 616 E. Street (FL 00-07-28) es no ....:;::_.. 32) Potter, 463 East Shore Drive (FL 00-08- " ""-..,. - yes no Trust for Rehabilitation & Nurturing Youth & Families Inc., 100 N. Greenwood A venne (FL OOX'y(CRA 00-09-01) es no k. S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check Iist.doc , - \ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: October 17~ 2000 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00-08-19) ~ yes no Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (LUZ 00-08-09) ~yes no City of ClearwaterlFirst Baptist Church, 3070 Chesapeake Lane (LUZ 00-08-11) ~yes no Olson & W. Patricia C./City of Clearwater, 2071 Lantana Avenue (ANXOO-09-13) yes / no KheanglCity of Clearwater, 2014 Poinsetta Avenue (ANX 00-09-14) yes / no Michael & Linda Biros, 1407 Nurs/oad (ANX 00-08-15) yes no Thacker/City of Clearwater, 1708 E EI Trinidad Drive (ANX 00-09-17) yes / no .. , ~ RIC Properties!J. Rogala/City of Clearwater, 1880 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00- 09-18) ~es no Jeff Mack, 2189 Springrain Drive (FL 00-08-31) ~o yes William Roberson, 1135 Marshall Street (FL 00-08-30 /' yes no Cinevision Properties and Scott Hoover, 616 E. Street (FL 00-07-28) /yes no Steve Dino & Penelope PatapislPaschoalina Potter, 463 East Shore Drive (FL 00-08- 32) 0es no Trust for Rehabilitation & Nurturing Youth & Families Inc., 100 N. Greenwood Avenue (FL 00-08-34), (CRA 00-09-01) ~s no }D Iv Da e S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check Iist.doc , 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: October 17~ 2000 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & r McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00-08-19) y~ +00 Ciaramello & Kelly, 1::& 111 MCMXlle::OOth Road (LUZ 00-08-09) City of ClearwaterlFirst Baptist Church, 3070 Chesapeake Lane (LUZ 00-08-11) y~ -+00 Olson & W. Patricia C./City of Clearwater, 2071 Lantana Avenue (ANXOO-09-13) y~ -1-00 Kheang/City of Clearwater, 2014 Poinsetta Avenue (ANX 00-09-14) yes ~oo Michael & Linda Biros, 1407 Nuryoad (ANX 00-08-15) yes no Thacker/City of Clearwater, 170~riOidad Drive (ANX 00-09-17) yes no . RIC Properties/J. Rogala/City of Clearwater, 1880 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00- 09-18) yes +no Jeff Mack, 2189 Springrain Drive (FL 00-08-31) y~ -+no William Roberson, 1135 Marshall xet (FL 00-08-30 yes no Cinevision Properties and Scott \07' 616 E. Street (FL 00-07-28) yes ~no Steve Dino & Penelope Patapis/Paschoalina Potter, 463 East Shore Drive (FL 00-08- 32) yes +no Trust for Rehabilitation & Nurturing Youth & Families Inc., 100 N. Greenwood Avenue (FL 00-08-34), (CRA 00-09-X) yes ~no I~~I Date s: lanning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check Iist.doc 't 4 ~II . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: October 17 ~ 2000 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00-08-19) ,I no yes Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (LUZ 00-08-09) V yes no City of ClearwaterlFirst Baptist Church, 3070 Chesapeake Lane (LUZ 00-08-11) ~// no yes Olson & W. Patricia C. /City of Clear\l':ater, 2071 Lantana Avenue (ANXOO-09-13) yes V no Kheang/City of Clearwater, 2014 Poinsetta Avenue (ANX 00-09-14) yes / !\., no Michael & Linda Biros, 1407 Nurset:;y Road (ANX 00-08-15) j yes no Thacker/City of Clearwater, 1708 E EITrinidad Drive (ANX 00-09-17) yes \/ no I ~ .. RIC Properties/J. Rogala/City of Clearwater, 1880 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00- , 09-18) \/ yes no I Jeff Mack, 2189 Springrain Drive (FL 00-08-31) yes v no William Roberson, 1135 Marshall Street (FL 00-08-30 \/ yes no Cinevision Properties and Scott Hoover, 616 E. Street (FL 00-07-28) \l no yes Steve Dino & Penelope Patapis/Paschoalina Potter, 463 East Shore Drive (FL 00-08- 32) / \/ yes no Trust for Rehabilitation & Nurturinl1Youth & Families Inc., 100 N. Greenwood Avenue (FL 00-08-34), (CRA 00-09-91) V yes no /0 bate ~ J/'-, b ~LJo c' S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check Iist.doc J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: October 17, 2000 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00-08-19) yes j no Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMul~ Booth Road (LUZ 00-08-09) yes ~ no City of Clearwater/First Baptist Churc~, 3070 Chesapeake Lane (LUZ 00-08-11) yes V no Olson & W. Patricia C./City of Clear7ter, 2071 Lantana Avenue (ANXOO-09-13) yes no Kheang/City of Clearwater, 2014 pOiitta A venne (ANX 00.09-14) yes no Michael & Linda Biros, 1407 Nursery!oad (ANX 00-08-15) yes no Thacker/City of Clearwater, 1708 E i Trimdad Drive (ANX 00-09-17) yes no r . , RIC Properties/J. Rogala/City of Clearwater, 1880 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00- 09-18) yes /'no Jeff Mack, 2189 Springrain Drive (F7-08-31) yes no William Roberson, 1135 Marshall Street (FL 00-08-30 /no Cinevision Properties and Scott Hoove/,E. Street (FL 00-07-28) yes no Steve Dino & Penelope PalaPislPaschoalitotter, 32) I yes no yes 463 East Shore Drive (FL 00-08- Trust for Rehabilitation & Nurturin%:YOut & Families Inc., 100 N. Greenwood A venue (FL 00-08-34), (eRA 00-09-01) yes no /0 J DO Date S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check Iist.doc , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: October 17,2000 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00-08-19) yes ./ no Ciaramello & Kelly, 107 & 111 McMullen Booth Road (LUZ 00-08-09) yes v no City of Clearwater/First Baptist Church, 3070 Chesapeake Lane (LUZ 00-08-11) i yes no Olson & W. Patricia C./City of Clearwater, 2071 Lantana Avenue (ANXOO-09-13) J no yes Kheang/City of Clearwater, 2014 Poinsetta Avenue (ANX 00-09-14) yes V no Michael & Linda Biros, 1407 Nursery Road (ANX 00-08-15) J yes no Thacker/City of Clearwater, 1708 EEl Trinidad Drive (ANX 00-09-17) yes ~no . RIC Properties/J. Rogala/City of Clearwater, 1880 McMullen Booth Road (ANX 00- 09-18) yes j no Jeff Mack, 2189 Springrain Drive (FL 00-08-31) / no yes William Roberson, 1135 Marshall Street (FL 00-08-30 yes ./ no Cinevision Properties and Scott Hoover, 616 E. Street (FL 00-07-28) yes j no Steve Dino & Penelope Patapis/Paschoalina Potter, 463 East Shore Drive (FL 00-08- 32) ) yes no Trust for Rehabilitation & Nurturing Youth & Families Inc., 100 N. Greenwood A venue (FL 00-08-34), (CRA 00-09-01) J yes no ) I nature ~ \O/ll-<JO Date S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check Iist.doc