FLD2014-03007�
655 S GULFVIEW BLVD
��i�.���uuy Se�u�ice� �%r.c. FLD2014-03007
1
Clearwater Grande Holdings, LLC
Zoning: Tourist Atlas #: 285A
CLEARWATER GRANDE DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
QUALITY INN/HAMPTON INN & SUITES
655 S. GULFVIEW BOULEVARD, CLEARWATER BEACH
FLD NARRATIVE
Description of Request
Civil
land Planning
'� - �iligence Reports
Use, Annexation
3ter Management
Utility Design
Traffic
>n Administration
The Community Development Board approved FLD 2011-05019 on May 21, 2013 ("Approved Site
Plan") and City Council approved the associated development agreement, Case No. DVA 2013-
03001 on June 19, 2013, approving the grant of 80 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. The City
approved minor amendments to the Site Plan on February 25, 2014 which adjusted parking, drive
aisles, and various other minor site considerations. On February 3, 2014, the applicant submitted a
request to amend the development agreement to increase the number of units by 10 for a total
number of units on site of 181 overnight accommodations. This application proposes to further
amend the approved site plan to include the additional 10 units and make a modification to the
location of the driveway entrance.
The Applicant, Clearwater Grande Development, LLC, requests an amendment to the Approved
Site Plan to provide approval to allow redevelopment of an existing 91-unit overnight
accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District to 181 overnight accommodations units; 91-units
within the existing Quality Inn hotel and 90-units within a new proposed Hampton Inn hotel
including 90 units from the Hotel Density Reserve. The subject property is an aggregate of 1.437
acres and is bounded by Clearwater Pass to the south, Gulfview Boulevard to the north, the Econo
Lodge hotel to the west and the Continental Towers condominiums to the east.
The application provides no changes to the existing Quality Inn, a second hotel with 90 units, and a
new structured parking garage designed to serve both hotels. The prior approval reduced the
number of units in the Quality Inn by 10 units as the owner contemplated changing these units from
single rooms to suites. After discussions with Quality Inn corporate branding and further research
of market conditions, it was determined that the market would not support the continue occupancy
of suites in the Quality Inn product. Therefore, the Applicant is specifically requesting to amend
the prior approval without the suites and with the origina191 units.
The site is located within an area designated by Beach by Design as the "Clearwater Pass District "
Beach by Design identifies this as a distinctive area, offering a diversity of uses including high rise
condominiums, resort hotels, hotels, motels, retail and restaurant uses. Beach by Design
contemplates that the "Clearwater Pass District" will be an area of strategic revitalization and
renovation in the response to improving conditions on the balance of Clearwater Beach.
300 South Belcher Road
Clearwater, Florida 33765
,Beach by Design identifies a disparity between hotels and condominiums, and strongly encourages
mid-priced hotel development. Beach by Design indicates Clearwater Beach can support an addition
1,385 hotel rooms and further provides increased densities through the Hotel Density Reserve to aide
in achieving the additional mid-priced hotel units on Clearwater Beach.
The new Hampton Inn and Suites with Parking Garage is proposed within the area currently utilized
as an expansive surface parking lot to the west of the existing Quality Inn.
Specifically, the Applicant requests and amendment to the Approved Site Plan to permit 181
overnight accommodation units in the Tourist District, which includes 90 overnight accommodation
units from the Beach by Design Hotel Density Reserve; as such, the site includes:
a. Lot Area of 1.437 (mol) acres (62,620 square feet);
b. Lot Width of 248 feet on Gulfview Boulevard;
c. Maximum Building Height (above BFE)
Hampton Inn: 133'-6" to roof deck, 138'- 6" to top of parapet and 146'-8" to the top of
the elevator tower. Quality Inn: 49.5';
d. Front (North) Setback along Gulfview Boulevard:
Hampton Inn: 3'-4" to entry canopy, 1.8' to decorative canopy, 5' to the building.
Quality Inn: 0.8' to covered deck and 8.1' to parking lot pavement;
e. Side (West) Interior Setback:
Hampton Inn: 6.8' to decorative canopy, 9'-5" to decorative banding and 10'-1" to
building;
f. Side (East) Interior Setback:
Quality Inn: 0' to wood deck, 6.5' to pool pavers and 10' to building;
g. Rear (South) Waterfront Setback:-
Hampton Inn: 6.25' to the pool deck, 20'-3" to the pool and 47' to the canopy, 60'-2"
to Bldg.
Quality Inn: 0' to pool pavers and stage, 14' to covered patio, 15.8' to the pool and
26.6' to building;
h. Providing 218 Parking Spaces (1.20 spaces/unit); and
i. Flexibility to the minimum standards for Sight Visibility Triangles on Gulfview
Boulevard
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.0 of the
Development Code with a reduction to the landscape requirements through a Comprehensive
Landscape Application to allow a reduction to the foundation planting from 5' to 0.80' .
General Applicabilitv Criteria
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is
located.
The speciiic request does not modify the approved scale, bulk, coverage, density
or character of the proposed development. This request is to allow 20 units
previously proposed to become suites in the existing Quality Inn Hotel to remain
as single rooms and increase the density of the Approved Site Plan.
2
The Quality Inn Hotel has been in existence for over 30 years and the existing
contemporary structure is in keeping with the character of the adjacent properties
and will continue to be an anchor for this area of the beach.
The adjacent properties are of varying scale, bulk, coverage and density with
characteristics common to 1970 design, development and construction. The
property east of the site is developed with a twelve (12) story condominium built
in 1970 and provides 88 attached dwelling units. The property west of the site
consists of a mid-rise hotel development iive (5) stories in height, with minimal to
no setbacks to the property lines and was constructed in 1972.
The proposed re-development plan meets the scale bulk, coverage and density
allowance as outlined within the Beach by Design criteria associated with hotel
development and is within the allowable limits of the flexible standards of the
Development Code for comprehensive infill development projects.
Although current development trends and allowances are different from those of
the 1970's, the overnight accommodation use is similar to the surrounding hotel
and high rise condominium uses of the adjacent properties. The design provides
buildings of varying heights, with step-backs and setbacks creating a harmonious
development in keeping with the varying character of the vicinity
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair
the value thereof. Keeping the Quality Inn at its existing density does not
impact neighboring properties.
This modiiication to the Approved Site Plan will not discourage appropriate
development and use of the adjacent land and buildings, the area is already
developed and the value of adjacent and surrounding properties will not be
compromised.
The Approved Site Plan further enhances this area of the Beach in a number of
ways, including:
1. Two nationally-recognized hotel chains will attract guests who will become
patrons of Beach restaurants, shops and tourist attractions, offering support to
many local businesses.
2. The property value will significantly increase.
3. The proposed architecture of the new hotel, upgrades to the existing hotel and
the proposed landscape design will significantly enhance the area.
4. Providing mid-priced hotel accommodations on Clearwater Beach with
adequate parking meeting a current need.
5. The construction associated with the new hotel will meet current building
codes, FEMA and ADA requirements.
6. The new hotel will contribute to the City's economic base, create new
employment opportunities while under construction and permanently once in
operation. The retention of the downsized Quality Inn will allow many
existing employment positions to remain in the market and a continuation of
contribution to the City's economic base.
3
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The existing Quality Inn does not impact health and safety of persons nearby and
the redevelopment of the site complies, as required, with all applicable codes
including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire
Prevention Code.
Through this redevelopment plan a single shared access point is proposed; the
access point is existing and will serve both the existing Quality Inn and the
proposed Hampton Inn and Suites. An improvement to safety for pedestrians,
bicyclist and motorist is achieved through the deletion of the existing most
western access point; this access point will be limited to trash staging and pick up.
The proposed parking structure is designed to accommodate hotel guests of both
the existing Quality Inn and the proposed Hampton Inn and Suites; access to the
garage is internal to the site, mitigating traffic concerns.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traf�c congestion.
Keeping the 10 units in the existing hotel does not negatively impact traffic. The
applicant previously provided formal Traffic Impact Study for additional
information.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The applicant only purposes to modify the prior approval to include 10 existing
units within the Quality Inn. The CDB found the approved project is within the
community character of the immediate vicinity. The south/west side of Gulfview
Boulevard historically and currently is largely comprised of high rise
condominiums, hotels and resorts. The vicinity as a whole is comprised of
varying character, heights and uses; from one and two story overnight
accommodations and retail uses, to high rise hotels and condominiums. The
designs of the proposed hotel and the existing hotel are consistent with the
surrounding and nearby uses and the character of the community, providing an
appropriately scaled development for the Clearwater Pass District of Clearwater
Beach.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent
properties.
The inclusion of 10 existing units in the prior approval does not adversely affect
adjacent properties. The redevelopment proposal will improve the visual appeal
of the property, offering a Key West Coastal Architectural design which is
appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this waterfront property.
The proposal provides a full 10' setback from the west property line to the
building footprint, where zero setbacks are permissible. The lesser western
setback of 8' is actually to a decorative banding that is located along the building
face. The proposed building design provides the desired "wedding cake effect"
4
with step-backs in the building, offering changes in plane, decorative bandings
and canopies to mitigate impacts on the adjacent sites.
The proposed trash collection area is screened and climate controlled and will not
negatively impact the passerby whether on a visual or olfactory basis. Adequate
parking with parking control is provided and will minimize congestion.
Through thoughtful design the proposed parking structure is appropriately
shielded from the street and waterfront, and is designed to blend seamlessly with
new hotel. The architectural components of the new building provide the desired
buffering and minimize all activities associated with the hotel operation at street
level. �
The proposed hours of operation associated with the new hotel pool and outdoor
areas will be similar to the surrounding hotels. Noise associated with specific
hours of operation for these areas are articulated in the approved development
agreement. The Hampton Inn franchise maintains a tight control on operations,
the comfort of their guests is of the highest priority which will translate into being
an excellent neighbor.
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT - PROJECT CRITERIA
While this request does not include changes to the approved site plan, responses to
specific design criteria are included below.
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
Certain deviations from Code are required to accomplish the design criteria and
standards associated with Beach by Design. The proposed deviations from Code
are necessary and the minimum required to maintain the existing mid-priced
Quality Inn and to provide a new mid-priced Hampton Inn as understood by
Beach by Design. The development provides a more pedestrian friendly design as
is envisioned by Beach by Design in lieu of the suburban style design generally
supported by the LDC.
The proposed design of the Hampton Inn provides a parking structure below the
hotel, efiiciently designed to accommodate the guests of both hotels making far
better use of this valuable waterfront property.
Height
Flexible Development Standards for the Tourist District allow flexible height of
between 35'-50' with the additional height allowances through Beach by Design
superseding the district regulations.
The proposed heights of both buildings are within the allowable limits contained
within Beach by Design. The proposed height of the Hampton Inn is 138'6" to
the top of the parapet with the height of existing Quality Inn being 49.5' to the
roof deck; both buildings meet the height guidelines prescribed within Beach by
Design and are appropriate for the site and similar to the neighboring 12 Story
5
Condominium. The proposed placement of the Hampton Inn will allow a provide
separation between the taller buildings along the block, insuring a walled effect is
not created.
The proposed hotel meets the separation requirements contained within Beach by
Design in association with buildings over 100'. The area is primarily comprised
of buildings nine stories or lower and are at or below 100' in height (from BFE).
The Continental Towers to the east and the 440 West Condominiums to the west
are over 100' and within 800' of the project area which meets the requirements of
separation contained within Beach by Design.
The proposed height of the Hampton is the minimum necessary to create a viable
mid-priced hotel project, provide the required parking levels and to address the
sites location within a flood zone.
Setbacks
Through this proposal, the eastern edge of the site will remain unchanged adjacent
to the Quality Inn; the existing hotel offers reduced building setbacks similar to
many of the surrounding sites. The setback reductions requested are typical for
re-development projects on Clearwater Beach and as envisioned by Beach by
Design. The proposed setbacks are within the allowances of the flexible
standards of the LDC associated with Comprehensive Infill Projects and meet the
criteria and design guidelines contained within Beach by Design.
The proposal complies with the Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent
possible; the new hotel provides balconies along facades, with generous vertical
step-backs of building along elevations. The lower portion of the west elevation
of the new hotel/parking structure is placed at a 10' setback with decorative
banding and canopies added to the fa�ade further soften the western elevation.
Beach by Design encourages minimal setbacks to support a more pedestrian
environment; the proposed design offers the desired reduced building setbacks
along the street frontage with the remaining areas in-filled with tropical plantings
adjacent to the right-of-way.
The proposed deviations to Code are necessary and the minimum required to re-
develop the site with a new mid-priced hotel and to address the existing Quality
Inn. The deviations are necessary to accommodate the restoration of mid-priced
hotel rooms as desired and envisioned by Clearwater Ordinance No. 925-08 and
to meet the Beach by Design guidelines.
Sight Visibilitv Triangles
A request for flexibility with regard to sight visibility triangles at the driveway
along Gulfview Blvd. was previously approved and the design has not changed;
the applicant intends to work with the Transportation Division to install safety
measures (such as signage and pavement markings) to insure adequate visibility
far the safety of motorists, pedestrians and guests.
2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose,
6
intent and basic planning objectives of this code, and with the intent and
purpose of this zoning district.
The proposed redevelopment will provide a highly desired use which contributes
to the city economy; overnight accommodation uses are allowed in the "Resort
Facilities High" land use category and are consistent with the goals of the
Comprehensive plan and Beach by Design.
Applicable Comprehensive Plan Goals/Policies/Objectives include but are
not limited to:
A.6.6 Objective - Tourism is a substantial element of the City's economic base
and as such the City shall continue to support the maintenance and enhancement
of this important economic sector.
A.6.7 Objective - Redevelopment activities sha11 be sensitive to the city's
waterfront and promote appropriate public access to the city's waterfront
f��Y�11f�K�.�!
Beach by Design Marine District prefers hotel uses and specially envisioned mid-
sized hotels. The availability of updated affordable overnight accommodations is
integral to the success of tourism, both locally to Clearwater Beach and the
Community as a whole. The proposed waterfront hotel promotes tourism
activities and enjoyment of our natural resources.
3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
The proposed re-development is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more
particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 together with
Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development.
The proposed redevelopment project will beneiit the community as a whole and
this district. The proposed hotel may encourage additional investment and
improvement to the surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the
proposed development.
Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of this
proposal. The proposed overnight accommodation use is an allowable use within
the District and is well established within the neighborhood; the neighboring
property to the west is also an overnight accommodation use. The lower profile
Quality Inn portion of the site is adjacent to an existing the 12-Story
condominium development to the east.
The proposal provides a beautiful new updated structure which meets current
building codes, FEMA regulations, Fire and ADA requirements.
The re-development proposal will improve the visual appeal of the property,
offering a Key West Coastal Architectural design which is appropriate and
aesthetically pleasing for this waterfront property. The proposed Hampton Inn
7
building design provides step-backs along the elevations, changes in plane,
decarative bandings and canopies to mitigate any impact on the surrounding sites
as required by Beach by Design criteria.
The enclosed parking structure designed to accommodate the parking needs of
both hotels, is appropriately shielded by its design to blend seamlessly with the
rest of the hotel. The architectural components of the building provide desired
buffering and minimize all activities associated with the hotel operation at street
level.
Responsible site drainage, appropriate setbacks for the beach community and
tropical landscaping will provide further benefits to the neighborhood and
community. The proposed trash collection area is screened and climate
controlled and will not negatively impact the passerby whether on a visual or
olfactory basis.
The proposed hours of operation associated with the pool and outdoor areas will
be similar to the surrounding hotels. The specific hours of operation for these
areas associated with the Hampton Inn are not yet known, but will obviously be
within the limits of code. The Hampton Inn franchise maintains a tight control
on operations, the comfort of their guests is of the highest priority which will
translate into being an excellent neighbor.
Through the proposed improvements, together with the nationally recognized
Hampton name and the retention of the Quality Inn it is anticipated the proposed
re-development will have a positive effect on the surrounding land values, tax
base and tourism.
5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land
use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially
alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall
demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum
standard, flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a signi�cant economic contributor to the
City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating
jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or
redevelopment of an existing economic contributor
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an
area that is characterized by other similar development and where a
land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in spot land use
or zoning designation;
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new andlor
preservation of a working waterfront use
The "Resort Facility High" land use category and the "Tourist" zoning district
both permit overnight accommodation uses; the district allows overnight
accommodation uses as a minimum standard and flexible standard use.
8
The new proposed mid-priced hotel will be a significant economic contributor to
the City, promoting tourism and will generate approximately 25 new full-time and
15 new part-time employment opportunities for the community.
The Quality Inn, will continue to offer reasonable room rates while continuing to
enjoy a strong and loyal 27°Io rate of return each year. The retention of the
Quality Inn will further insure the preservation of an existing waterfront use in
addition and the continuation of 25 existing employment positions.
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height, and off-
street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the
following design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses
permitted in this zoning district;
Overnight accommodation uses are permitted in the Tourist (T) zoning
district without special approval. As the surrounding properties are made
up of overnight accommodations, high rise condominiums and various
retail and restaurant establishments the proposed hotel will not impede
normal and orderly development and improvements of the surrounding
properties as previously discussed within General Applicability Criteria 2.
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines
adopted by the City;
Through appropriate site and architectural design the proposed re-
development complies with the design guidelines contained within Beach
by Design by:
• Providing an architectural design which offers breaks in the
fa�ades with balconies, windows and a generous stepback along
the west elevation. Further providing varying roof lines and a Key
West Coastal design with a mixture of color, texture and details.
All plan planes in the building are broken up at a minimum of
every 100'. At least sixty percent of each elevation is covered with
windows or architectural decoration.
�
• Offering tropical plantings in all available areas to improve the
pedestrian environment, utilizing drought tolerant multi-level
plantings which will thrive within the Clearwater Beach
environment.
• Proposing a hotel use which is an appropriate use for the area;
• Providing adequate parking within a parking structure including a
shared parking arrangement to allow the highest and best use of
this very valuable and visible site. The design of the proposed
development meets the goals and objectives of Beach by Design.
c. The design, scale, and intensity of the proposed development supports
the established or emerging character of an area;
The character of the area is reflective of the codes and architectural style
of the 1960's and 1970's; the proposed development compliments and
supports the character of the area while providing a development reflective
of current codes, design guidelines, architectural designs, scale and
intensity.
The proposed re-development has been designed to complement the older
established character while supporting the emerging character of the
Clearwater Beach; offering a beautiful design which facilitates the
development and overall enhancement of the tourist area on the beach
offering support to the adjacent properties with a well planned
development that reflects the Beach by Design vision.
Please see additional discussion under General Applicability Criteria 1.
d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive
appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial
number of the following design elements:
• Changes in horizontal building planes
• Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices,
stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings,
etc.
• Variety of materials and colors
• Distinctive fenestration patterns
• Building stepbacks; and
• Distinctive rooF forms
The above elements are incorporated into the architectural design of the
Hampton Inn as shown on the building elevation. The design provides
changes in the horizontal plane through locations of balconies, windows
and architectural details.
10
A significant building step-back is offered along Gulfview Boulevard and
to the west Econo Lodge site. Beginning on the sixth floor, the strategic
location of Amenity level creates this large change in the building plane
and mass as prescribed by Beach by Design. At 41'-6" above the BFE the
building mass steps back dramatically, mostly at the beach side but also
along Gulfview Blvd. The building mass above 45' remains within the
70% allowable building envelope and continues to step back to the east
side at 93'-6" and above. The design takes into account all the required
elements of Beach by Design, Including: at least 60% architectural
decoration on each elevation (see chart on each elevation sheet), awnings
which shall be of 3 distinct colors, bike racks, front fa�ade will comply
with the 60% opening/decor below 12', color palate is within the range of
those presented in the Beach by Design standards, pavers are used
throughout the project in lieu of standard concrete, and the parking
structure is not readily recognizable as such in that it blends with the
architecture style, design and decoration of the tower above
The architectural design offers a variety of materials, colors, and textures,
distinctive and varying roof forms are also provided to compliment the
Key West Coastal design of the building
Some of the above elements are also present within the existing
architectural design of the existing building. The Quality Inn is an
existing contemporary structure with metal roofs similar to the proposed
Hampton Inn. Through this re-development proposal, with the use of
color on the roof and the building mass this building will be nicely
updated to compliment the new Key West Costal Design of the proposed
Hampton Inn and Suites. Through the use of color and mass the existing
Quality Inn will appear more broken up with the creative use of paint
bands and coordination alignments of the adjacent base colors and
patterns.
The proposed landscape improvements will also help to unite the site as a
whole at the pedestrian level. The new pool deck and amenity area on
grade associated with the Hampton Inn will enhance some of the more
plain walls of the Quality Inn near the south west end as viewed from the
street.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers,
enhances landscape design and appropriate distances between
buildings.
The proposed buffers and setbacks provide appropriate buffering and
distances between buildings, similar to adjacent and surrounding
developments. The re-development plan provides a shared parking
structure with access which is internal to the site. The landscape design
will present an inviting tropical appearance and meets the intent of Beach
by Design.
Beach bv Design
11
This modified re-development proposal includes 90-units from the Beach by Design Hotel
Density Reserve and provides 125.96 units per acre where 150 units per acre is allowed by
Beach by Design.
Through this action the existing 91-unit Quality Inn hotel remain as it exists today and the
approved 90-unit Hampton Inn (and parking structure) will be constructed.
The design is respectful of the architectural vocabulary within Beach by Design and the
community character; the building is in scale to its height and length and offers the desired
elements of step-backs, balconies, changes in plane, massing and floor plates.
The west elevation provides a substantial change in setback with an inset of over 30' in the upper
floors near the West end of the building, step-backs are also provided at both stair towers with
openings for the garage providing additional breaks in the western plane. The North elevation,
adjacent to Clearwater Harbor provides a highly articulated building base with changes in
elevation being accomplished through Trim bands, canopies, and decorative shutters.
Although this information is more clearly illustrated and evident within the provided
architectural plans, as requested, please see the detailed description of the project's compliance
with the step-back criteria of Beach by Design below:
BFE: +5'-6" AFF
@ 6�' floor +47'-0" AFF the floor plate is 20,061 SF including 9,279 SF of terrace space.
@7tn floor +59'-0" AFF the floor plate steps back to 8,173 SF from the South and the
north side.
@ l lt" floor +99'-0" AFF the floor plate steps back to 7,187 SF at the West side to the
East
The plans also step in 5' x 15' at least every 100' around the perimeter.
The proposed hotel meets the separation requirements contained within Beach by Design
in association with buildings over 100'. The area is primarily comprised of buildings
nine stories or lower and are at or below 100' in height (from BFE). The Continental
Towers to the east and the 440 West Condominiums to the west are over 100' and within
800' of the project area which meets the requirements of separation contained within
Beach by Design. (Please see illustration provided to the Planning Dept. which
delineates the surrounding buildings and heights.)
The street-level fa�ade offers the desired architectural details and elements so the parking
garage is not readily apparent as desired by the Design Guidelines. The new proposed
tropical landscaping will offer further improvement and enhancement of the streetscape.
The architectural design introduces a mixture of colors, textures and details with tropical
landscaping provided along the street frontage where possible. The design incorporates a
stepped massing approach which is reinforced by the tiered balconies and multiple
elegantly scaled roof elements. The garage is also articulated with decorative openings,
canopies and shutters which create an elegant pedestrian environment. The garage is
highly articulated and will be perceived as an elegant building and not a garage.
Please see Architectural Plans for additional illustrative evidence of compliance with the
Design Guidelines contained within Beach by Design.
12
Clearwater Grande Development, LLC Hampton Inn /Quality Clw Bch MODIFIED 04.10.2013for CDB sub /rmr
13
� v
° �learwater
U
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residential Uses
IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE,
INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION.
ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES)
TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE.
A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL
AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS.
THE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
PIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200
APPLICATION FEE: $1,205
PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED):
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE:
MAILING ADDRE55:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
d?�
-
G�..r b
LD�N �S, LG. G
.Vr� • cIw'f' � 37( 7
���
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: �Q SS S�C111�.�T� Gt�L �C Vt �Ew � Wn . G`W. xj 3'�� �J
�1 ,!
PARCEL NUMBER(S): �'1 �,,q � t S' �� s'QD �t � � D�' �- O� 8 O
LEGALDESCRIPTION: c'�' �� ?�?� 'PL�NI �•- �Sy�#'r G .
PROPOSED USE(�): �Q7�jL S
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: g��� ��(� j�� ��
Specifically identify the request
(include all requested code flexibility;
e.g., reduction in required number of
parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot
size, lot width, specific use, etc.J:
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 1 of 8 Revised 01H2
�
° �learwater
U
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Data Sheet
PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM
WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEfERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING
APPLICATION CYCLE.
ZONING DISTRICT:
FUTURE LANO USE PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING USE (currently existing on site):
T
� f ��
1,i0�M�--
PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): � ��%�► L
SITE AREA: �p?,G �i !�i sq. ft.
GRO55 FLOOR AREA (total square foota e of all buildings�:
Existing: ���_ sq. ft.
Proposed: Ii � sq. ft.
Maximum Allowable:
sq. ft.
r� � 3 / acres
GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses):
First use: sq. ft.
Second use: sq. ft.
Third use: sq. ft.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: CI . 8 �
Proposed:
Maximum Allowable:
BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (15` floor square footage of all buildings):
Existing: � �. sq. ft. ( �j � �
Proposed: '3�j � �% sq. ft. ( 5't,. �'L
Maximum Permitted:
sq. ft.
% of site)
% of site)
°/a of site)
GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer):
Existing: " ' sq. ft. ( � Q• O %a of site)
Proposed: sq. ft. ( � % of site)
VEHICULAR USE AREA (parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area):
Existing: �� ���_ sq. ft. ( �. �o of site)
Proposed: ��p $�j Q sq. ft. ( % of site)
Planni�g & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�4865
Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12
�
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the total square footage of entire site):
Existing: $
Proposed: s�jj Qj �
Maximum Permitted:
DENSIIY (units, rooms or beds per acre): BUILDING HEIGHT:
Existing: , �
�j Existing: � �%., ��E
Proposed: � Proposed: � � 3 � � ~ �f � Rp0 r• ne�k
Maximum Permitted: �� Maximum Permitted: �
OFF-STREET PARKING:
Existing:
Proposed: Z � a
Minimum Required: .� ,,, ��
WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF THE PROJECT UPON COMPLETION? $ I 3 M
ZONING DISTRICTS FOR ALL ADIACENT PROPERTY:
North: "'r
South: �'
East: �"r"
West: -t"
STATE OP FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS / �
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to a d subscribed before me this �CO � day of
representations made in this application are true and "r �O /^l , to me and/or by
accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize
City representatives to visit and photograph the ��� A� ct—+P� , who is personally known has
property described in this application. produced as identification.
Signatu
JANET L. KRUEQER
Notary Puplic • Shte ol florl
Y cmm. pka Jun 2!, 2t
ComnN:tioa N EE 17i�,i'
8ond�d TAroupA NMi111N Nef1n►M
Notalpr public,
My commission expires:
�
Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-d865
Page 3 of 8 Revised 01h2
I �
° �learwater Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
� Site Plan Submittal Package Check list
IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE
PLAN SUBMITTAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS:
�esponses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the
subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide
these responses.
� Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application
General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses.
Q A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property,
dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including
official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site.
�If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as
ovided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5.
Q If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other similar
marine structure, then the application must provide detailed plans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional
engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair
or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on
private and commercial docks.
� A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals
SO feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information:
� Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon.
�North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared.
�dentification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases.
L'f Location of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard
Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable.
� Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site.
3 Locafion and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points
of access.
�Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and
seawalls and any proposed utility easements.
jj� Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed
stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit.
� Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection.
�Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406.
�All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections
and bus shelters.
�Dimensions of exisfing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building
parations.
�Y Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials.
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearvvater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�865
Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12
! '
10 Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage.
� Demolition plan.
� Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally
sensitive areas.
Ir.�i If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than SO% (excluding those standards where the
difference between the top and bottom of the range is one parking space►, then a parking demand study will need to be
provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are
approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information.
� A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and identifying
those trees proposed to be removed, if any.
a A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and
condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff.
� A Traffic Impact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more
of the following conditions:
■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the
abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or
■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to
unacceptable levels; or
■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportable accidents within a prior twelve
month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided
by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or
■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review
process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments
with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors.
�A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved
or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's
current records, or if an amendment is required to an existing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional
landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if
not therwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval:
C� Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including
botanical and common names.
�Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line.
�nterior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square
feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and
vehicular use areas.
� Locafion of existing and proposed structures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences,
pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines,
sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawalls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features
that may influence the proposed landscape.
�Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape
islands and curbing.
9 D�inage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations.
�°
�6�Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any.
Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Fl 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�865
Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12
° Clearwater
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
� General Applicability Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE
CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located.
S �C� r� �► /%,2%rt i �E.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings
or significantly impair the value thereof.
S+�.f, c�►,r�.n.t�"� t�/Ks
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the proposed use.
gle-ic N� t'�-�j -� t✓ 1�
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
. i��
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
�� � l� �L,�b"i l V�F
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
`3# � n1p�.�Ll'T tv�
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 6 of 8 Revised 01/12
° �learwater
U
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
Flexibilitv Criteria
PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO THE APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC USE(S) BEING REQUESTED AS SET
FORTH IN THE ZONING DISTRICT(5) IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED. EXPLAIN HOW, IN DETAII, EACH CRITERION
IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (USE SEPARATE SHEETS AS NECESSARY).
i. ��G� � /s t1..h.�1. "r t 1/�i
z.
��
a.
F�
6.
8.
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 7 of 8 Revised 01/12
° �learwater
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
� Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
G°%�-�:IaR—E,v�ti��il�' ��i,�.�t�i[�� �—�u^�j,�` �'r� ��-'�1
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
_ . ,� .-. _ _
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request):
�s, ����
I� � � .
4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
�
O i2
rC��Zi
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described
property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this applicafion and the owner
authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
"�
�
Property Owner Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Property Owner
BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON
F /�
THIS (,0 � DAY OF , �O % �J( , PERSONALLY APPEARED
��,, n /1 0!%
Nott�y Publk • St�N of fbri0i
My Comm. Expkn Jw� 2i, 20/6
Commis�fon f EE 176N5
BondM TAron�h NMh�ll No11ry ANn.
Notary Seal/Stamp
WHO HAVII�G BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN
Y UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED.
�
Notary Public Signature
My Commission Expires: � �,� ��� �p
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865
Page 8 of 8 Revised 01h2
° �learwa
ter
Planning & Development Department
Flexible Development Application
" Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative
1. Provide names of all property owners on deed — PRINT full names:
�,� ��Z� i 'j�? �� l �� , � /, � LL�-
2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
� ,•
rG `'� 5 � � i,��. FW ���. W
�'�i.�v r�� c.t �,r.2 .��7�,r .`_� � 7 C �
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe request):
� �:J� � !'� T 7hi � � 1'� ti b ►�-- �"'r \ �, i
F
4. That the und rsigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
,
_ �, ��� C< � l � ,, -� i -a- . � �
as (his/theirj agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described
property;
6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner
authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
7. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
c----,
� �
-"�� =.,
Property Owner . Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Property Owner
BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN QFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THEe�OF�LORI , ON
/ // ��
THIS (L' Th DAY OF % ,;� O�� , PERSONALLY PPEARED
_� X e . i n. �.f , n
My Comm. fxpirn Jun 29, t01d
Commlufon I► EE 17al66
8w�d�d TArouOh NNbeN Noqry AN�,
Notary Seal/Stamp
WHO HAVING BEEN FIRST DULY SWORN
UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE ,4FFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED.
�
Notary Public Signatu
My Commission Expires: �j �� y/�
Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562�865
Page 8 of 8
Revised 01N2
. �
�I�:�200v�Fi1819 BK: 13822 PG: 129, 09/10/2004 at 04:49 PM, RECORDING 1 PAGES
$1�.��0 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $99500.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT
PINFLLA� COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDU08
�
1261—
T6b Documenf Prepared By end Relurn la: � .
Joeaph J. Weiaenfeld, Esq. �
WEI9ENFELD 6 ASSOCIATES, P:A. ��
550 Biltmore Way �1i
8uite 1120 ` '
Coral Gables, Florida 33134 —_ ' �
— _ � �
rnrc�I�DNumber:l7-29-15-05004-003-0080 - ���
GranueNl7'IN: 59-2904561 � ' �
Special Warranty Deed _ _ _ ,
ThisIndenture, Madechis dayof , 2004 n.o., Between ,'��
Alpha Beach Resort, Inc., a corporation existing under the laxs of the '� '
I � \� �
State of Florida � � ��
or ih� Co»�ry or Pinellas , sieie ot Florida , grantor,,-��a�. ''
Clearwater Grande Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability cort�}Sariy�� ,__,
r i
��hose �dd«:s �s� 20001 Gulf Boulevard, Suite 5, Indian Shorea, FL 33785 �, ', �� �,
� ��
� ,,
or m� co����iy or Pinellas , sia�c of Florida , grantee. � '-
Wtfl18SSCf�I lhal Ihc GRANTOA, (or and in considcralion of �he sum u(
------------------------TEN DOLLARS (S1O)--------------- \�—�---- DOLLARS,
and other good anJ valuable consiJerelion lo (iRANTOR in hend paid by GRANTCE, the receipt whereof ix here�y acknowledgfJ, haa
grxnled, borgained and sold lo lhe said GRAN7F.0 end GRAN'I�EE'S heirs, successors end assigns fnrev,ei, Tht following tlescribed'IapA, siluelq
� ��
lying aod bcing in ihe County o( Pinellas siem of Florida, �� ia,wii;'
Lots 8`through 11, inclusive, Block C, of SAYSIDE 5, �ceerding�•to the
Plat thereo£, as recorded in Plat Book 38, at Pac�e.38,`�df�the Public
Racords of Pinellas County, Florida. ��
, \
_, �`
Subject To: �' ��
� ,
, ��
1. Taxes and assessments for the year �Q04��and all;�ubsequent years.
�
2. Conditions, covenants, restriet�on's,�anc� �as@ments filed of record,
provided that this instrument sh�IL�no� ieiihpose same.
Together ���Ih all lenements, heredilamenLt and app�iACnance5 there�iQ �elonging or in anywise appehuining.
1�0 �AYO aI1V f0 f�0�(�� Ihe. snmc in lee simple 1'Qrcvei. ' .
l�Il(� the grintnr hercby covrnaNS witle snM—Franlee'�hat grantor is IewPolly seized of snid land in fee simple; Ihal granlor hm
gond righl and lawfid niitliority �cf scTl a'nd oonvey xai��land; tha[ grantor hereby fidly wartants the litle lo said InnJ and will
delend tl�c same against �he la�vl'ul c'nims a! all pqrsrns cl8ipiing by, through nr under grantor.
I � � �
�Ii WItIlC39 W�1¢t'80f� �hr.grantdr haa hemumo s�t ��s hand and seal ihe day and year first Above wrilten.
Signed; sealed and delivcr�d in our presenee:.� p a Beaeh Resort, Inc .
' ,�yl_ '�;�, �---" _
. . � - _ . . gy : (Seal)
Printed N'�me; �herifert Jacquine Alf� ed ., President
W3�(1e99 P.O. Address: (55 Soulh Gulfvlew Roulev�rd, Clearwakr, FL7J767
Prin Name: �C�uchi Andre Republic ol Franse
Witnestis, �. Department.ol the
- Bouches-du-Rhone �S$ : (Corporate Seal)
EMBASSY OF TIIE UNITED STATES OF AMERR�I14o( Marseille
Country of Consulate General ol the :
City of ine, Ellen B.THO�t�ORa�1BS 0/AlI78lICa
The foregoing instnnnenl wu ncknowledged belbre 18 AU US t' Consul of the United Stetef
of Americn nl duly cnmmissioned nnd qualitied. �Mis day ol' P' � QQOQ ny
P3rsei1l Fran e
Alfred �inez, �resicfent of Alpha Beach Resort, Inc., a Florida
Corporatioj�, :on;, behalf of the corporation
he is personally I�nq�'d io mj or IiE kis produceJ his i as identilication.
Carte d immatriculation Consulaire
!''� �' ��• f� �n; , l��r �^�
� • ' • ' :.n � ��i
_,� �Y �� �"'•��" �� n.��pi� PL1IIt6d N8m9: Fllan R_TH(1RRIIRN
EII'i� °THORBURN
`y:� i% �ti r,, ' � • ;, � �"• Notary Public
';'CONSUL OF THE My Commiasion expires:
'�' '%`• UryITEd STATES OFAMERICA Indefinitely
�� � ^ ' . . .
,� _
;./�,,. _ ,
T `?w `„`
�l , ' ' � I,uerGenn�ledby00i�p1+YSy�iem�,lne., ]OOl (16))Jb)�5555 F��mFLSWD-I
r ��
� � � .
1>
1 �
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
FOR
HAMPTON INN
S. GULFVIEW BOULEVARD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PREPARED FOR:
CLEARWATER GRANDE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
PREPARED BY:
GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC.
OCTOBER 2012
PROJECT # 12-055
/
�
Robert Pergolizzi, CP/PTP
AICP #9023 / PTP # 133
,.` . �� �
�
I. INTRODUCTION
The applicant is proposing to redevelop their property on Clearwater Beach into a
116 room Hampton Inn resort hotel. (See Figure 1) The proposal is for the new
hotel and parking structure to be located in what is currently a surface parking lot
of the existing Quality Inn Hotel at #655 S. Gulfview Boulevazd. The parking
garage and driveways will serve both hotels. The redevelopment of the property is
the subject of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment in the Tourist "T" zoning
district. This application requires an assessment of the traffic impacts of
development. Prior to completing this analysis a methodology was established
with the City of Clearwater staff.
II. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
The property has frontage on S. Gulfview Boulevard east of Hamden Drive. South
Gulfview Boulevard was reconstructed as a two-lane collector roadway with on-
street parking running along Clearwater Beach. Coronado Drive was
reconstructed as a three-lane collector roadway with on-street parking. Hamden
Drive intersects with S. Gulfview Boulevard at a signalized intersection. The
adjacent segment of S. Gulfview Boulevazd between Hamden Drive and the
Clearwater Pass Bridge is three lanes. Per the approved methodology traffic
counts that were conducted on June 21, 2012 at the following intersections during
the weekday PM peak period of 4-6 PM were used s a basis for this study:
S. Gulfview Blvd. / Hamden Drive
S. Gulfview Blvd. / Coronado Drive
Coronado Drive / Hamden Drive
These were supplemented by a traffic count at the existing site driveway to S.
Gulfview Boulevard in October 2012.
All traffic counts were converted to annual average equivalents using FDOT
seasonal adjustment factors. Existing traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2.
Existing intersections were analyzed using the HCS+ and SYNCHRO software.
The count data, HCS+ and SYNCHRO printouts are included in Appendix A.
Pr�.sently the signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Coronado Drive
operates at LOS A with average delay being 6.6 seconds per vehicle and an
intersection capacity utilization (ICU) of 42.5%.
Presently the signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive
operates at LOS A with average delay being 5.7 seconds per vehicle with ICU of
41.8%.
1 � t __ _ �� ��
�
�
�/�
w
3
w
�
�
w
a
�
C7
�
PROJECT LOCATION PROJECTNO:
1 2-055
DATE: FIGURE:
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. 1 0�201 2
+""� �► . : Land Development Consulting
�i1� ENCINEERIf�G TRAI�SPORTATION PLANNWG PER�t[TTC1G
r� � 13825 ICOT BLVD., SUITE 605
Clearwater, Florida 33760 DRAWN BY:
Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 5246090
www. gulfcoastconsu ltinginc. com T N
W
C7
Q
�
�
�
�
d
a
O = TRAFFIC SIC
_ __ . __ __
� ��
EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
,���� �` � Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
�1'4r�'► Land Development Consulting
ENG41'EERING TRA�SPORTA'f10N PL�WNLVC PEFN9T1'I,�'C
� %� �� 13825 ICOT BLVD., SLJITE 605
Cleanvater, Florida 33760
Phone: (727) 524-181 B Fax: (727) 5246090
www. gulfcoastconsultinginc. com
(2012)
DATE:
10/2012
DRAWN BY:
TN
PROJECT NO:
12-055
FIGURE:
,• •�
' i� �
At the intersection of Hamden Drive / Coronado Drive the primary movements
are eastbound-to-southbound and northbound-to-westbound, whereas the
southbound approach (Hamden Drive) is stop controlled. The HCS+ analysis
shows the primary movements operate at LOS A with delay of 8.2 seconds per
vehicle and the southbound stop-controlled movements operate at LOS C with
delay of 16.6 seconds per vehicle.
At the site driveways, the western driveway is gated closed, and the eastern
driveway serves all traffic to the Quality Inn. At this location the westbound left
turns entering the site operate at LOS A with average delay of 8.4 seconds per
vehicle, and the northbound approach exiting the site operates at LOS C with
average delay being 16.4 seconds per vehicle.
South Gulfview Boulevard functions as collector roadway and according to
FDOT 2009 QLOS Handbook capacity tables has a LOS D capacity of 1,440
vehicles per hour on the undivided segment. The segment of Gulfview Boulevard
east of Hamden Drive and Coronado Drive are both three-lane collector roads
with a LOS D capacity of 1,520 vehicles per hour. The existing PM peak hour
LOS for areas roadway segments is shown below:
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS (2012)
PM Peak LOS D
Roadway Se�ment Lanes Volume Capacity LOS
S. Gulfview (E. of Bayway) 3-lanes 878 1520 B
S. Gulfview (Bywy-Hmdn) 3-lanes 1080 1520 C
S. Gulview (Hamden -5�') 2LU 493 1440 B
S. Gulfview (Sth — Coronado)2LU 611 1440 B
Coronado (Hamden — 5�') 2LD 650 1520 B
Coronado (Devon Dr - S. Gulfview) 2LD 967 1520 C
Coronado (Gulfview to Roundabout) 4LD 1556 2900 C
Hamden (S. Gulfview-Coronado) 2LD 732 1520 B
Presently all roadway segments operate at LOS C or better.
III. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Existing traffic was adjusted by a 2% annual growth rate to the expected build-out
yeax of 2017 to account for background traffic from other nearby redevelopment
projects. In addition traffic from the proposed Clearwater Resort hotel complex
was added.
The site will be developed as a 116 room resort hotel with associated parking and
amenities. Using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) T� Generation, 8�'
Edition rates, the amount of new trips was calculated and estimates axe shown
below:
2
.t
r� . �-�
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES
Land Use Amount Dailv Tri�ps PM Peak Trips
Resort Hotel 116 Rooms 948 57 (24/33)
The vehiculax access will be taken from S. Gulfview Boulevard at the existing
eastern driveway. The western driveway will serve trash collection vehicles only,
and the expected distribution is as follows:
60% to / from the north (34)
40% to / from the south (23)
PROJECT IMPACT CALCULATIONS
Project
Road Seement Lanes Project Trips Capacitv Percent
S. Gulfview (E. of Site) 3-lanes 23 1520 1.51%
S. Gulfview (Site — Hamden) 3-lanes 34 1520 2.24%
S. Gulfview (Hamden — Coronado) 2LU 14 1440 0.97%
Coronado (Hamden — 5�' St) 2LD 20 1520 1.32%
Coronado (5�` St — S. Gulfview) 2LD 20 1520 132%
Coronado (Gulfview — Roundabout) 4LD 34 2900 1.17%
Hamden (Gulfview — Coronado) 2LD 20 1520 1.32%
Project traffic impacts will be primarily to Coronado Drive and S. Gulfview
Boulevard. All intersections, roadway segments and project driveways were
analyzed for future conditions. Future traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3, and
the SYNCHRO and HCS+ printouts are included in Appendix B.
The signalized intersection at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Coronado Drive would
continue to operate at LOS A with average delay of 7.0 seconds per vehicle and
an intersection capacity utilization (ICU) of 49.2%.
The signalized intersection
continue to operate at LOS
with ICU of 44.9%.
at S. Gulfview Boulevard / Hamden Drive would
A with average delay being 6.5 seconds per vehicle
At the intersection of Hamden Drive / Coronado Drive, the HCS+ analysis shows
the primary movements operate at LOS A with delay of 8.5 seconds per vehicle
and the southbound stop-controlled movements operate at LOS C with delay of
22.9 seconds per vehicle.
At the project driveway to S. Gulfview Boulevard, the westbound left turns
entering the site would operate at LOS A with average delay of 8.8 seconds per
3
.' � �
�
W
a
�
0
�
wl7
W
�
�
C7
x
H
7
O
w�
� f
� ^�
rn
roo
��
r� u�
-- 368 J +
337 —� 326 � � �
11� ° �
�
DEVON DR.
1213 VPH TWO— WAY
(652 NB, 561 SB)
2ND ST.
STH
w
>
�
Q
O
Ca
�
z
0
x
0
U
3RD ST.
W
�
�
Ca
3T.
z
w
A
�,�s ""
y, s �,
s ��
� �i
4
411�
BRIGHTWATER DR.
BAYSIDE DR.
N
1 1 f 921 VPH TWO—WAY
~�S� a, � N,� (445 NB, 476 58)
NN �p�
N � Ih
`��� � '� � L 396 � p``i BLVD
� z3s BP'�
43 J � 63 — 522
257 ` � � 14 -- 536
686 `
e = TRAFFIC SIGNAL 5�� � ' �1 � 568 � �
N T
��
SITE �
FUTURE PEAI� HOUR TRAFFIC ( 201'7 ) PROJECTNO:
12-055
DATE: FIGURE:
;� �� �`�'�� Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
�'� � � Land Development Consulting 10 / 2 012
� � �, ENCINEERIYC TRA�SPORTATION PL.41V1VTNC PERMITTIRG
� � 13825 ICOT BLVD., SUITE 605
Clearwater, Florida 33760 D�� BZ'�
Phooe: (727)524-IB18 Fax: (727)524-6090
wvvvv.gulfcoastconsultinginc.com T N
. . ��
r�
vehicle, and the northbound approach exiting the site would operate at LOS C
with average delay of 23.7 seconds per vehicle.
FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT
PM Peak LOS D
Roadwav Seg,ment Lanes Volume Capacitv LOS
S. Gulfview (E of Site) 3-lanes 1104 15.20 C
S. Gulfview (E of Hamden) 3-lanes 1317 1520 C
S. Gulview (Hamden -5�') 2LU 557 1440 B
S. Gulfview (Sth — Coronado)2LU 705 1440 B
Coronado (Hamden — 5�') 2LD 770 1520 B
Coronado (Devon. - Gulfview) 2LD 1213 1520 C
Coronado (Gulfview to Roundabout) 4LD 1896 2900 C
Hamden (S. Gulfview-Coronado) 2LD 921 1520 C
All roadway segments would continue to operate at LOS C or better.
IV. CONCLUSION
This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology
established with City of Clearwater staff. The project will generate 948 daily trips
and 57 PM peak hour trips. This analysis demonstrates traffic operations at neazby
intersections and on adjacent roadways would continue at acceptable levels of
service with or without the project impacts.
�
Rbbert Per�golizzi
�l�
�
From: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 11:05 AM
To: Robert Pergolizzi
Subject: RE: Hampton Inn / Quafity Inn Traffic
O k.
From: Robert Pergolizzi [mailto:pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:00 AM
To: Patni, Himanshu
Subject: Hampton Inn / Quality Inn Traffic
(�
Himanshu - This corrspondence is to confirm the telephone conversation we had a few weeks ago
regarding the development of a 116 room Hampton Inn in the area next to the existing Quality Inn at #655
S. Gulfview Bivd.
GCC will conduct a traffic study for the proposed 116 room Hampton Inn. Existing conditions for the
following intersections wifl be based on the PM peak period intersection counts conducted for the
Clearwater Resort TIS in June 2012.
S. Gulfview/ Coronado (signal)
S. Gulfview / Hamden (signal)
Hamden / Coronado (Y-intersection with stop sign)
These will be supplemented by driveway counts at the existing Quality Inn to establish existing site traffic.
Adjacent roadways will be analyzed for existing conditions.
Future conditions will consider the "total traffic" from the Clearwater Resort TIS as background traffic for
this study. The Clearwater Resort TIS assumed a 2% growth rate and a 500 room resort hotel. The trip
generation of the proposed 116 room Hampton Inn will be estimated using ITE rates and added to the
accumulated background traffic to estimate future conditions with the proposed Hampton Inn. A TIS
Report will be submitted with the application.
Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, PTP
Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc.
13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605
Clearwater, FI 33760
Phone: 727-524-1818
Fax: 727-524-6090
C e I I p h o n e: 72 7-644-26 95
email: pergo@gulfcoastconsultinginc.com
10/19/2012
Page 1 of 1
2011 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL
Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE
MOCF: 0.92
Week Dates SF PSCF
_______________________________________________________________________
1 O1/Ol/2011 - O1/O1/2011 1.06 1.15
2 O1/02/2011 - O1/08/2011 1.05 1.14
3 O1/09/2011 - O1/15/2011 1.04 1.12
4 O1/16/2011 - 01/22/2011 1.01 1.09
5 O1/23/2011 - O1/29/2011 0.99 1.07
6 O1/30/2011 - 02/OS/2011 0.97 1.05
* 7 02/06/2011 - 02/12/2011 0.95 1.03
* 8 02/13/2011 - 02/19/2011 0.93 1.01
* 9 OZ/20/2011 - 02/26/2011 0.92 1.00
*10 02/27/2011 - 03/OS/2011 0.91 0.98
*11 03/06/2011 - 03/12/2011 0.90 0.97
*12 03/13/2011 - 03/19/2011 0_90 0.97
*13 03/20/2011 - 03/26/2011 0.90 0.97
*14 03/27/2011 - 04/02/2011 0.91 0.96
*15 04/03/2011 - 04/09/2011 0.92 1.00
*16 04/10/2011 - 04/16/2011 0.93 1.01
*17 04/17/2011 - 04/23/2011 0.94 1.02 •
*18 09/24/2011 - 04/30/2011 0.95 1.03
*19 05/O1/2011 - O5/07/2011. 0.96 1.04
20 05/OB/2011 - OS/14/2011 0.97 1.05 �
21 OS/15/2011 - OS/21/2011 0.99 1.07
22 OS/22/2011 - OS/28/2011 0.99 1.07
23 OS/29/2011 - 06/04/2011 0.99 1.07
24 06/OS/2011 - 06/11/2011 1.00 1.08
25 06/12/2011 - 06/18/2011 1.OQ 1.08
26 06/19/2011 - 06/25/2011 .O1 1.09 _
27 06/26/2011 - 07/02/2011 1.01 1.09
26 07/03/2011 - 07/09/2011 1.01 1.09
29 07/10/2011 - 07/16/2011 1.02 1.10
30 07/17/2011 - 07/23/2011 1.03 l.11
31 07/24/2011 - 07/30/2011 1.03 1.11
32 07/31/2011 - 08/06/2011 1.04 1.12
33 OB/07/2011 - OB/13/2011 1.05 1.14
34 OB/14/2011 - 08/20/2011 1.06 1.15
35 OS/21/2011 - 08/27/2011 1.06 1.15
36 OB/28/2011 - 09/03/2011 1.07 1.16
37 09/04/2011 - 09/10/2011 1.07 1.16 .
36 09/11/2011 - 09/17/2011 1.08 1.17
39 09/1B/2011 - 09/24/2011 1.07 1.16
40 09/25/2011 - 10/O1/2011 1.06 1.15
41 10/02/2011 - 10/OB/2011 1.05 1.14
42 10/09/2011 - 10/15/2011 1.09 1.12
43 10/16/2011 - 10/22/2011 1.04 1.12 j MC, c1 �ry,���,-y
44 10/23/2011 - 10/29/2011 1.05 1.14
45 10/30/2011 - 11/OS/2011 1.05 1.14
46 11/06/2011 - 11/12/2011 1.05 1.14
47 11/13/2011 - 11/19/2011 1.05 1.14
48 11/20/2011 - 11/26/2011 1.05 1.14
49 11/27/2011 - 12/03/2011 1.05 1.14
50 12/04/2011 - 12/10/2011 1.06 1_15
51 12/11/2011 - 12/17/2011 1.06 1.15
52 12/18/2011 - 12/24/2011 1_OS 1.14
53 12/25/2011 - 12/31/2011 1.04 1.12
* Peak Season
Page 1 of 2
, , . ��
� ,
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LOCATION: Coronado Dr-- S Gulfview Blvd
rrrvic�rnrc. rie�.,.,�Fe� Q��..ti ci
75B 783
�a t�
319 439 0
J i �.
319 M 275 ,� �, 0 f. 0
0 .► 0.91 d 0
zas � �t Z r o� o
h t N
0 508 0
a +�
450 508
� � �
�.
���
17 �,� y �: . 114
��. I
�~�
�J + * i.�
NA
d i �.
« J L «
w
��:n,xi�d':.
NA y �''�* �. NA
A 'i �� i t
'1 t f'
� a NA * �
�
Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
Peak-Hour: 4:45 PM -- 5:45 PM
Peak 15-Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM
�
r
�lJd�,l�►� �t�4.1�'!'�'�
-r<��ris.r.+:r.-:,-i�,�„t -ta'.�
C4.�:L�CT:U>: -_.e?:'Ir_:�5
�JJ11
1
�
�
�
rT�
QC JOB #: 10778501
DATE: Thu Jun 21 2012
o.s i.o
�� *�
1.9 0.2 0.0
.� i 4
1.9 � 2.5 ,: ���� L 0.0 � 0.0
o.o ♦ �` � o.o
���.� .
2.4 � 0.0 ? C 0.0 �► 0.0
h t �'
0.0 02 0.0
a r
0.2 02
0 0 0
� .� a a
0 ,! � i 0
o � �� � o
.,��
o > � o
�,*�.
�o z o�
NA
d i �.
� ,r� L
NA f •� � NA
i C
h t r'
� NA �
R• = RTOR
Min Count Coronado Dr Coronado Dr S Gulfview Blvd 5 Gulfview Blvd
Period (Northbound Southbound Eastbound estbound) Hourly
�inning At Left Thru RI ht U R' Left Thru Rf ht U R" Left Thru Ri ht U R' Left Thru Ri ht U R' Total Ta�18
4:00 PM 0 122 0 0 0 0 115 84 0 0 76 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 401
4:15 PM 0 121 0 0 0 0 94 68 0 0 61 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 345
4:30 PM 0 119 0 0 D 0 iD7 82 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 379
:45 PM 0 111 0 0
��= �.�t
4q3
���
zi e�
s 9 —� E� ��
� 5l3
Heavy Trucks 0 0 0
Pedestriens 16
Bicycles 0 1 0
Raiiroad .
Sto ed Buses
Comments:
Report generated on 6l26/2012 12:06 PM
107 60 0 0
0 0 4
0
0 0 0
6 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 I 353
4 0 0
12
0 0 0
0 0 0
104
0 D 0
Total
1704
B
132
1
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
� . . . {� �
,
ype of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LOCATION: S Hamden Dr-- S Gulfview Blvc
CITYISTATE: Clearwater Beach, FL
352 347
�a tL�
20 0 332
s� i 4
228 f. 39 ! � 308 f. 514
228 �► 0.94. F 208
265 �► 0 i i' 0�► 558
Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
QC JOB #: 10778505
Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM
Peak 15-Mfn: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM
�h t � �
a � * � '��Id�l'�� �A€!f1'�S
0 0 �iskP�I.T;,ff#HTiTIf'3i.d :rA7,.4
'L'it:!�C1"/�+p .ch'rP—"
J � �
„I ��,p��i o
��'�
�a *�
NA
d i �.
�" J �s .,. < �•
4?�
NA �R �'�" f� NA
,► 'i ty,�., C �
'1 t f'
�a NA t �
� � r
�
�
�
�
L
�---
o.s o.s
�� *L�
0.0 0.0 O.B
.1 i 4.
2.2 � 0.0 ,t w' � 0.6 ♦ 1.4
�f� '
2.2 ♦ :"'��tv `, 4 2.4
��S.f
1.9 .F 0.0 3 t O,D � 1.4
h t P
o.o o.a o.o
�+ t
0.0 0.0
I 0 D 1
J � � V
0 1 �,z L 0
T
� � -_ :� y. � i
" � f^�,
o '� ' � o
ti * �►
� o 0 0 �
I NA
J J i 4
� J � t
NA � •a � NA
Z • �
� w * f �
NA
R' = RTOR
Min Count S Hamden Dr S Hamden Dr S Gulfview Blvd S Gulfview Bivd
Period (Northbound) (Southbound) Eastbound (Westbound Hourly
�inning At Left Thru RI ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R" Left Thru Rf ht U R; Left Thru Rf ht U R" Total Totals
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 6 0 1 4 54 0 0 0 0 48 46 D 26 263
4:15 PM 0 D 0 0 0 92 0 6 0 1 10 59 0 0 0 0 30 53 0 26 279
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 3 0 0 10 45 0 0 0 0 77 SB 0 35 303
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 1 0 3 1D 59 0 0 0 0 43 30 0 29 257 1102
SF-' IAl
' ° 33s
�9._.J, � �
zz8.,,�, ,C 3 t 1
�— [v
Heavy Trucks 0 0 0
Pedestrians tOD
Bicycles 0 0 0
Railroad
Sfo ed Buses
Comments:
Report generated on 6/26/2012 12:06 PM
8 0 0
BO
0 0 0
0 8 0 0 8 4
20 0
0 0 0 D 0 0
Tofal
12�0
28
2D0
0
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.quaiitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
. . (�
. ,
� Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak
LOCATION: S Hamden Dr -- Coronado Dr
31 63
� � * I�
3 0 28
J i 4
294 M 4 � �, 59 t+ 350
336 .► 0.91 � 291
340 A 0 % i 0�► 364
'1 t f�
0 0 0
a r�
0 0
� � L.�
��
oia���i,e
�~�
�a *�
NA
.► a �
« .fi i . t F
;a�%;::
i�"
NA �► ^��w f. NA
� 'y '�1�". C �
ti � �
NA
i * �
Dr
Perfod
Iinnfng At
Method for
Peak-Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM
�
�U�itl"�l '�Q�lEi'CS
-rara.*:.rc,,�-asir�ga �a � a
[•.;_i� � ��::'i •7>�. =F:�,f u_c�
�J �
�
--�
Dr
�
(�
mining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
QC JOB #: 10778504
DATE: Thu, Jun 21 2012
3.2 1.8
�a +�
0.0 0.0 3.8
.i i �.
2.4 (� 0.0 ? L 1.7 f 2.3
�,�'�
1.2 t "� . �. 2.4
ti+�
1.2 �► a.0 Z {' 0.0 � 1.4
h t r►
o.o o.o o.o
a *�
0.0 0.0
0 0 0
.� i 4
° s ,, ��.., � s
t � ;C�3!` � a
,�..
o > < o
�*�.
�000�
NA
J i �.
� J .�. L
NA � •� �. NA
Z i'
'1 t f
� NA �
R' = RTOR
ironado Dr Coronado Dr
asthound) (Westbound) Houriv
oc�w �� e� �_n r�_. e�_u �� .,e i Viai � r_�_,_
_ ... _ . . _ . .... .___ .. _.. _. _. . .__. ._..._.
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 � 1 0 0 D 74 0 0 0 0 66 13 D 0 161 713
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 U 10 0 0 0 0 3 96 0 0 0 0 74 11 0 0 194 708
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 83 0 0 D 0 87 9 0 0 185 702
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 � 0 78 0 0 0 0 73 11 0 0 168 708
�F= 1,oi
4�
399
'' Zi'
�J �
�
� � �,
Z9�{
Peak 75-Mtn � Northbound
Flowrates I Left Thru Riaht U R"
All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 (
Heavy. Trucks 0 0 0
Pedestrians 28
Bicycies 0 D 0
Railroed
Sto ed Buses
Comments:
Report generated on 6/26/2012 12:06 PM
4 0 0
20
0 0 0
0 8 0
0
0 0 0
0 24 4
20
0 o z
Total
796
40
68
2
SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
LANE TYPE:
NB
SB
EB
we
PEAK HOUR
PEAK HOUR ! P.H.F. DATA
HAMPTON INN PROJECT NO: 12-055
East Drwy (N6) & Gulfview Blvd (E-VI�
October 18, 2012
SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y R
(SECONDS) (not applicable)
2 Lane NB N/A Ng
N/A SB N/A SB
2 Lane Eg 25 EB
1 Lane yyg P5 WB
TIME
PM
4:00-4:15
4:15�:30
4:30-4:45
4:45-5:00
5:00-5:15
5:15-5:30
5:30-5:45
5:45-6:00
TIME
PM
4:30-4:45
4:45-5:00
5:00-5:15
5:15-5:30
PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS
NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY
L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES
197
184
225
193 799
234 836
215 867
184 826 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM
198 831
0 0
19 0 8 0 0 0 0 801 19 5 778 0 1,630 1 �
NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB W8 Wg WB TOTAL 0 0 0
� T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME I I �
�I i
225 424 �— 0 —� t— 0 � 476
193 423 —+ �— 412
234 433 —� 10 � j— 4 —► 429
— -- 215 � � �
12 0 6 0 0 0 0 423 10 4 412 0 867 12 0 6
INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR
INTEI2SECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME
PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB
PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB
PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB
PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB
4:30-530
867
18
0
433
416
INTERSECTION PHF
PHF NB
PHF SB
PHF EB
PHF WB
0.93
0.64
#DIV/0!
0.93
0.92
��= 1,a4
� ��— �
� u `�
1 ?
14 18
� �
1 Z ('
*�— 42 �
yr `}'
❑
,� . . �� ���
!_anes, Volumes, Timings
3: 6/27/2012
� � � � � �
Lane Configurations �j� a''� '�'� �
Volume (vph) ' 278 11 ` 0 ` 513 443 ; 322
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 500 500 500 0;
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft)` 25 25 _
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1,00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.95 : _
Frt 0.994 0.850 _
Flt Protected 0,954
Satd. Flow (prot) 3427 0 0 3539 3539 1583
FIt Permitted 0.954 '
Satd. Flow (perm) 3322 0 0 3539 3539 1502
Right Turn on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 354
Link Speed (mph) 20 25 25 _
Link Distance (ft) 331 260 350
Travel Time`(s) 11.3 7.1 9.5
Confl. Peds. (#mr) 17 33 17
Peak Hou� Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 -
Adj. Flow (vph) 305 12 0 564 487 354
Shared Lane Tra�c (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 317 0 0 564 487 354
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No . No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ? 1.00 '
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number. `of Detectors 1 1 2 2.? 1' _
Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 20
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector1 Extend (s) OA OA OA 0.0 OA :
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 OA
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0,0
Turn Type NA ' Perm NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 2 6
Gulfview Coronado Existing 201212:00 pm 6127/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
-
. . ,. � � �
!_an�s, Volumes, Timings
3: 6/27/2012
� ~`t �1 '� � �
Permitted Phases : Z 6 '
.
:_ .
Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 6
__ _ _ _.
Switch Phase
_._:
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
M�n�mum sput (s) _ Zo.o 20.o zo.o 20.0 . 20.0
Total Spiit (s) 25.0 35A 35A 35.0 35.0
Tot21 Split (°/a) 41:7% 58:3% 58.3% : 58.3°/a 58.3°/a
Maximum Green (s) 21 A 31 A 31,0 31.0 31.0
Yellow Time (s) ; 3A 3.0: 3.0 3,0 3.0 _
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjusf (s) : 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA ` _ _
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize7
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3A 3,0
Recall Mode None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5A 5.0 5:0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0' 0 _
Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 32.6 32.6 32.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0,65 : 0.65 0.65
v/c Ratio 0.47 0.25 0,21 0,32
Control Delay 20.0 4.4 4.3 1.5 ,
_
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 20.0 4.4 4,3 1.5
LOS B A A A
Approach Delay 20.0 4.4 3.1 -
Approach LOS B A A
n�
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60 ; - _
,4ctuated Cycle Length: 50.5
Natural Cycle: 40
Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 _
Intersection Signal Dela�f:� 6.•-- Intersection LOS A�
Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Senrice A
Analysis Period (min)15
Gulfview Coronado Existing 201212:00 pm 6/27/2012 Existing Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
, .. r� ��
. ,
l�an�s, Volumes, Timings
3: 6/27/2012
,.�` �„ �' '�•. �► �
Lane Configurations �'� '� �' 'i'Y'
Volume (vph) 39 `228 206 311 ? 335 :" 20 ;
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 �
Lane Util: Factor 0,95 0.95 1.00 ' 1.00 0.97 ; 0.95
Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0,80 1.00
Frt 0.850 0.992
Flt Protected 0.993 0.955
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3514 1863 1583 3415 ' 0
Flt Permitted 0,897 0.955
Satd. Flow (perm) - 0 3129 1863 1273 ` 3415 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 331 86
Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 300 500 300
Travel Time (s) 8.2 13.6 8.2
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 82 82 11
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
,4dj. Flow (vph) 41 243 219 331 356 21
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) ` 0 284 219 , 331 377 : 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
L.ane Alignment : Left Left Left Right Left - Right:: _
Median Width(ft) 0 0 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 �` - _
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two wayieft Turn Lane:
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Tuming Speed (mph) 15 9 _ 15 9'
Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1
Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right ' Left `
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector .1 Size(ft)' 20 6 6 20 20
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 OA -
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 �
Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) OA 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 6
Switch Phase
Gulfview Hamden Existing 201212:00 pm 6/27/2012 Existing 2012 Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
. . �� �
L.an�s,'Volumes, Timings
3: 6/27/2012
� � "�" �. �► aI
Minimum Initial.(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 ` 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 8,5 20A 20A 20A 20.0
Total Sp.lit (s) ' 15.0 35.0 20.0 20.0 35.0
Total Split (%) 21.4% 50.0% 28.6% 28.6% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 10.5 31.0 16.0 16.0 ; 31.0 ? _
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) ; 1.0 1.0 '' 1 A 1.0 1.0
Lcst Time Adjust (s) 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) ` 4A 4.0 4,0 4,0 :
LeadlLag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Min : Min ` Min None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5A 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11 A 11 A
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 10.4 10,4 7,9
Actuated g(C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.30
v/c Ratio 0.23 0,30 0.47 0.35
Control Delay 6.0 6,9 3.4 6.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 _
Total Delay 6.0 6.9 3.4 6.8
LOS A A A A
Approach Delay 6.0 4,8 6.8
Approach LOS : A A A
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 26.4
Natural Cycle: 50
Control,Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio; 0.47 .-�
Intersecfton Signal Delay. .5�7
Intersection Capacity U6lization,�1.8%
Analysis Period (min)15 `�'
and Phases: 3:
�"06
In4ersectiorr LOS:,�
ICU Level of Service A
�04
�
�
m8
Gulfview Hamden Existing 201212;00 pm 6/27/2012 Existing 2012 Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
i wo- w ay �top �ontroi � . Yage 1 of I
� ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General lnformation Site lnformation ;
Analyst VT Intersection CORONAD DR/HAMDEN
Agency/Co. GCC DR
Date Performed 6/27/2012 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Analysis Time Period PM Peak Analysis Year 2012 EXISTING
Pro'ect Descri tion CLEARWATER RESORT
East/West Street: CORONADO DR North/South Street: HAMDEN DRIVE
Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25
, >; .. . . „ . _ ._ ,.- ..,
Vehicle,Volumes and Ad'ustments� � � �
Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 4 349 294 61
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 383 0 0 323 67
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 1 -- -- 0 -- __
Median T e Two Way Left Tum Lane
RT Channelized 0 p
Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0
Confi uration LT T TR
U stream Si nal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 2g 3
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 30 3
(veh/h)
Percent Heav Vehicles 1 0 1 0 1 1
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 p
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0
Confi uration TR
Dela _Queue Len th and Level of Service `
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT ' TR
v (veh/h) 4 33
C (m) (veh/h) 1137 343
v/c 0.00 0.10
95% queue length 0.01 0.32
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 16.6
LOS A �
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.6
Approach LOS � -- I -- I I C
�opyngnt u zui u university ot Fiorida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 10/18/2012 9:44 AM
file:UC:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9D.tmp 10/18/2012
. _
wc� ay op on ro i � Page 1 of 1
, ,
, ' TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
GeneraF lnformation Site� lnformation ;
Analyst RP intersection S. GULFVIEW/DRICEWAY
Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Date Performed 10/19/2012 Analysis Year 2012 EXISTING
Analysis Time Period PM PEAK
Pro'ect Descri tion
East/West Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD North/South Street: EAST DRIVEWAY
Intersection Orientation: East-Wesf Stud Period hrs : 0.25
Vetiicl�e Volumes��and4Ad'ustments:-� -
Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound �
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 440 10 4 428
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 473 10 4 460 0
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 __ __
Median T e Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0
Confi uration T TR LT
U stream Si nal 0 p
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 12 6
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00
Houriy Flow Rate, HFR 12 0 6 0 0 0
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Confi uration LR
Dela Queue Len th and Level of Service, .,'
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 4 18
C (m) (veh/h) 1076 334
v/c 0. 00 0. 05
95% queue length 0.01 0.17 _�
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 16.4
LOS A C
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.4
Approach LOS -- __ C
�opyr�gni u�u�u universicy or rionaa, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 10/19/2012 8:20 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2k9C.tmp 10/19/2012
o ,q'
r�, `1
r�
��
.•
TAB LE 4 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way Volumes for Florida's
Urbanized Areas �oi4i�o
STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAY5
C135S I(>0.00 to 1.99 si�palized intersections per mile) Lanes B C D E
Lanes Median B C D E 4 4,000 5,500 6,770 7,300
2 Undivided 930 1,500 1,600 *** 6 6,000 8,320 10,150 11,290
4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3,560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270
6 Divided 4,370 5,200 5,360 *** 10 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250
8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 *** 12 13,730 18,600 21,950 23,230
���,� tn4tP..v �,� �a3'7,� i�r� � ��r�7
�, Z� a f �p�� � a Freeway Adjustments
�,,. Class II (2.00 to 4�O�signalized mfersechor}s�e�'mile) Auxiliary Ratnp
rZanes Median B C D E Lanes Metering
** 020 1480 1570 +i,soo +s°io
� Z Undivided 1, , , _
4 Divided ** 2,420 3 2� 3,400
6 Divided ** 3,790 4,880 5,150 �INTERRUPTED FLOW HIGFIWAYS
8 Divided , ** 5,150 6,530 6,880
r4�,..1� Co NncoO �� . q 4� z ���, Zq �� Lanes Median B C D E
} Class III/IV (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620
f Lanes Median B C D E 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,840
j 2 Undivided ** 500 1,150 1,440 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280
� a Divided ** 1,220 2,730 3,100 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments
6 Divided 1,910 4,240 4,680 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustmeni factors
8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 2 Divided Yes +5°/a
1�
Multi Undivided Yes -5%
`�_ � u���' c��f �'l�rr. n4,� � t„ �� � WL„-[l... Multi Undivided No -25%
Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments BICYCLE MODEZ
(Alter corresponding state volumes by�the indicated percent.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes showa below by number of directional
roadway lanes to deteimine two-way maximum service volumes.)
o G��'�'� k4n� Paved Shoulder/ Bic
Major City/County Roadways 10 /o ycle Lane
Other Signalized l�padway - 3 ���a �p = Coverage B C D E
��5 ��Gr..ae.� GoJ 5'1S ��Ue4� 0-49% ** 31� 1�1g� >1�1g�
State & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments 50-84°/a 240 360 >360 ** *
(Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) 85-100% 620 >620 *** ***
Divided/LTndivided & Turn Lane Adjustments z
Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment PEDESTRIAN MODE
Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes F (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional
2 Divided Yes No +5o roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.)
2 Undivided No No -20% Sidewalk Coverage B C D E
Multi Undivided Yes No -5% 0-49% ** ** 480 1,390
Multi Undivided No No -25% 50-84% ** ** 1,1�0 1,820
- - - Yes "}'S% 85-100% *� 1�1�� I�g2� �1�82�
One-Way Facility Adjustment BUS MODE (Scheduled Fized Route)3
(Buses in peak hour in peak d'uection)
Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6. 5idewalk Coverage B C D E
o-sa% >5 >4 >3 >2
ss-ioo°io >4 >3 >2 >1
� Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and ara for tha sirtomob�le/truck modes unless specifically stated Although presented as peak hour two-
way volumes, they aceually represent peak hour pesk direction conditioas with an applicable D factor applied This table does not constitute a standard and should ba used only for
general planaing applicatioas. The compirter models from which this ffible is derived should be used for moro specific planning applications. Tha tahle and deriving computer models
should not be used for comdor or iniersection design, whem more refined techniques e�dst Calculations ara based on plaaning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle
LOS Model, Pedeshian LOS Model and Trensit Capacity and Quelity of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes.
� Level of servica for the 6icycle and pedeshian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of
bicyclists or pedeshians usiag the ficility.
' Buses per hour shown are only for the peek hour in the single d'uection of the higher haffic flow. • sou7'C2:
** cannot be achievad using rable inpurvatue defaulu. Florida Department of Transportation
*" Not applicable for tbat level of scrvice letter grade. For the automobila mode, volumes greater than level of service D Systems Planning Office
become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19
F) is not acluevable 6ecause there is no maximum vehicla volume threshold using table input value defaults. T31I311255CO3 FL 32399-0450
www.dot.state.fl us/plannine/svstems/sm/los/default shtm Z009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK
��
,�
: ���.���. :
i �"'�
- --
A �r � .
� ' l
�
Hotel
(310)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Rooms
On a: Weekday
( '�
Number of Studies: 10
Average Number of Rooms: 476
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Room
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
- - _ ,,_
8.17 3.47 - 9.58 3.38
ff:
Data Plot and Equation
�
�
c
W
a
F-
�
U
s
N
>
N
a�
ro
a�
>
Q
II
I---
�d,��
, �,oc
i s,00
15,00
14,OOi
13,001
72,00(
11,00(
10,OOC
9,OOC
8,000
7,000
6,000
s,000
4, 000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
V : . x
, --- � � � - - ----�--�-� --��- . . --� ----
� - --;-�--,----;- -., , : ---= ; ; : : :
� ��---- � -- . -- � - `.--- - --- ' .. -- ` -- , ---� --�: ---�----`_- -, ---, -
i---;--------•---�,-�- ;----,--- �---�•----�-� -�----•�-- ; - ,-- , - ---- �----,--�-
--- -- --- --- --- --�--, ---, - �, �� ; � -; --; ---, - - -, ---� --, ---, --
---;--�-- -- --- - -- - ----- -- - -- - -- - -� �-- ,- ��, -- , -- , --- , -� , -
� : : �'---; �---�----�----�--._�..--•- -if� --�-�--�-�--�----�-�--�---��---
_.. .- - - .. _. ' _ ' .- ; ; : ' ; � ,
---; ----- �� � ----�-�,--......, --�---------- --- -�� -��--- ��- �--- ....
-�-- --��- � -� , , ,
- - X� : ; ; ' - - � - - ; - � - -� - - ; � - -�- � � - • - � - -� - - - - - - - -
��/;�-X-------------� - --.-�;�-.---.---,-�-,---.--,---....
--- --- ��� ��� ��� �vv ovu auu ivuu 11uU 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900
X = Number of Rooms
X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ qverage Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T= 8,95(X) - 373.16
R2 = 0.98
Trip Generation, 8th Edition 580 I�stitute of Transportation Engineers
�
'�''
;�' .
, , .
• ,
� Resort Hotel
(330)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Occupied Rooms
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 10
Average Number of Occupied Rooms: 429
Directional Distribution: 43% entering, 57% exiting
Trip Generation per Occupied Room
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.49 _ � 027 - OJ2 0.70
,_ ___
�_�
Data Plot and Equa#ion
�
�
500
400
�
�
c
W
n
� 300
�
U
L
N
�
N
�
ro
� 200
Q
I I
F-
100
, , , X , ,
""""' ",_... "' "' "' """" ","" " """'," " "" _ l:i�' "' """"'."X" "' ".�.........
-•----- ; � --X- -�-�-----;--X -�-- --� - -� ; - ----�- ; ---� --; � - ---
; � x; :
X.' : : :
0
100 200 300 400 500 600
X- Number of Occupied Rooms
X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) - 1.13 Ln(X) - 1.52
Trip Generation, 8th Edition 647
700 800 900
------ Average Rate
RZ - 0.88
Institute of Transportation Engineers
{�
�
Lan�s,'Volumes, Timings
3: 10/19/2012
� � `� �' � +�
_ _- --
Lane Configurations �'�► �� �
Volume (vph) 326 11 0 652 550 368
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 500 500 500 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.95
Frt 0.995 0.850
Flt Protected 0.954
Satd. Flow (protj 3430 0 0 3539 3539 1583
Flt Permitted 0.954
Satd, Flow (perm) 3324 0 0 3539 3539 1502
Right Turn on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 404
Link Speed (mph) 20 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 331 260 350
Travel Time (s) 11.3 7.1 9.5
Confl. Peds, (#Ihr) 17 33 17
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Adj. Flow (vph) 358 12 0 716 604 404
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 370 0 0 716 604 404
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 2 2 1
Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Right
Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 20
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6
Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0,0 0,0
Turn Type NA Perm NA NA Perm
Protected Phases 4 2 g
Gulfview Coronado Future With project 12:00 pm 10/19/2012 Future with Hampton Inn Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
r , . � ��
Lar�es; Volumes, Timings
3: 10/19/2012
-� '� '� t � �
��: ��
Permitted�Phases 2 6
Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total Split (s) 25.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
Total Split (%) 41.7% 58.3% 58,3% 58.3% 58.3%
Maximum Green (s) 21.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
LeadlLag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max Max Max
Waik Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calis (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.6 31.8 31.8 31.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.63 0.63 0.63
v/c Ratio 0.51 0.32 0.27 0.37
Control Delay 20.0 5.1 4.8 1.7
Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Totai Delay 20.0 5.1 4.8 1.7
LOS C A A A
Approach Delay 20.0 5.1 3.6
Approach LOS C A A
;.1�:.
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 50.4
Natural Cycle: 40
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.51
Intersection Signal Dela 7.0 Intersection LO . A
Intersection Capacity Utilizatio 49.2% ICU Level of Se�A
Analysis Period (min)15 �
Gulfview Coronado Future With project 12:00 pm 10/19/2012 Future with Hampton Inn Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
� �
( ��� ( �
L.ane�,'Volumes, Timings
3; 10/19/2012
� � � � � �
�ane Configurations �'� � � �j�
Volume (vph) 43 257 235 396 429 22
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 0,95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95
Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.80 1.00
Frt 0,850 0.993
Flt Protected 0.993 0.955
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3514 1863 1583 3420 0
Flt Permitted 0.891 0.955
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3112 1863 1273 3420 0
Right Turn on Red Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 421 86
Link Speed (mph) 25 25 25
Link Distance (ft) 300 500 300
Travel Time (s) 8.2 13.6 8.2
Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 82 82 11
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj, Flow (vph) 46 273 250 421 456 23
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vphj 0 319 250 421 479 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 0 0 24
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1
Detector Tempiate Left Thru Thru Right Left
Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 .
Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 8 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Detector Phase 7 4 8 8 6
Switch Phase
Gulfview Hamden Future with Project 12:00 pm 10/19/2012 Future with Hampton Inn Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
r i , p . . �,.� 1
�
' Lan,��,�Volumes, Timings
3: 10/19/2012
� � � � � �
Lan �L��.� E�3T V,1�B �. � � n
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0
Minimum Split (s) 8.5 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Total Spiit (s) 15.0 35.0 20,0 20.0 35.0
Total Split (%) 21.4% 50.0% 28.6% 28.6% 50.0%
Maximum Green (s) 10.5 31.0 16.0 16.0 31.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Min Min Min None
Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 10.9 10.9 10.9 8.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.32
v/c Ratio 0.26 0.35 0.56 0.42
Control Delay 6.5 7.6 4.2 7,9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.5 7.6 4.2 7.9
LOS A A A A
Approach Delay 6.5 5.5 7.9
Approach LOS A A A
�n: �
_ .. . _ �
_ __ __--
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 28
Natural Cycle: 50
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56
Intersection Signal Dela : 6.� Intersection LOS�A
intersection Capacity Uti i�i 44. P/o ICU Level of Se�v e A
Analysis Period (min)15 �--�-�
and Phases: 3:
""'wo4
� _� � �'
Gulfview Hamden Future with Project 12:00 pm 10/19/2012 Future with Hampton Inn Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
+rwc,�-Way Stop Control �• Page 1 of 1
. . ( � ����
.'� R TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General:'lnformation�-. Site.�lnformation :
Analyst RP Intersection CORONADO DR/HAMDEN
Agency/Co. GCC DR
Date Performed 10/19/12 Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Analysis Time Period PM PEAK Analysis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT
Pro'ect Descri tion HAMPTON INN
East/West Street: CORONADO DR North/South Street: HAMDEN DRIVE
intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25
_m � �. �.�:�
Vehicle��Volumes�and A�d'ustments �� - . T= _,; �` ° "' -� ° ` � ��
., �� � � � ,.
,.,. , �- ��; : �,. ..�. ., � _-: , ,_ . �
Ma'or Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 4 419 352 93
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 451 0 0 386 102
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 1 -- -- p __ __
Median T pe Two Way Left Tum Lane
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0
Confi uration LT T TR
U stream Si nal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 65 3
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 0 71 3
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 1 0 1 0 1 1
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Fiared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0
Confi uration TR
_._ _ , _�. _ _
Dela�� �Queue Len'� th� and,�Level of Servicer �- � � � � �'
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT TR
v (veh/h) 4 74
C (m) (veh/h) 1046 274
v/c 0.00 0.27
95% queue length 0.01 1.06
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 22 9
LOS A C
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 22 9
Approach LOS -- __ C
�opyngnt v 1oi U Unlversity of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.6 Generated: 10/19/2012 9:18 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2kAE.tmp 10/19/2012
'`rwcs^Way Stop Control ('� �^� Page 1 of 1
7
� � � ��
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
, . � .. .
General.lnformation = . . � ��:� Sit�> Info�mation:�: . � ` �
Analyst RP Intersection S. GULFVIEW/DRICEWAY
Agency/Co. GCC Jurisdiction CLEARWATER
Date Performed 10/19/2012 Analysis Year FUTURE WITH PROJECT
Analysis Time Period PM PEAK
Pro'ect Descri tion
East/West Street: S. GULFVIEW BLVD North/South Street: EAST DRIVEWAY
Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25
Vefiicle}Volu�mes and�Ad`ustments �'� � �- ' i � �� -
Ma"or Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 549 24 14 522
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 1.00
Hourly Fiow Rate, HFR 0 590 25 15 561 0
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 0 -- -- 2 -- --
Median T e Undivided
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 1 0
Confi uration T TR LT
U stream Si nal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume veh/h 32 19
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.93 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 34 0 20 0 0 0
veh/h
Percent Heav Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Flared Approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Confi uration LR
.� _, _ _ _ _._ � __
. F,. _ ..
Dela - Queue Len th and Level of� Service <� . • � <� .a „ u•�. , .. _: ; ,
Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
v (veh/h) 15 54
C (m) (veh/h) 961 246
v/c 0.02 0. 22
95% queue length 0.05 0.82
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 23.7
LOS A C
Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 23.7
Approach LOS -- -- C
Copyright O 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
HCS+rM Version 5.6 Generated: 10/19/2012 9:21 AM
file://C:\Documents and Settings�rpergolizzi.GULFCOAST\Local Settings\Temp\u2kB3.tmp 10/19/2012
. � Color Swatches
(Shervvin Williams)
GENERAI. NOTE51-------------...
O GARAGE IS AN OPEN GARAGE WITM 20% OPEN
OB 70'�1" MINIMUMSPEARATION fRpAA E7CISTING
BUILDINGS TO PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE
KEY NOTES:
1� PAINTEO STUCCO TYP.
O PAINTEO ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH TRIM - NO
GUZING TYP. B PARKING GARAGE, TRIM COLOR
U3 ALUMINUMTIiELUS,TRIMCOLOR.
�4 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF NP.
OS ALUMINUM SHl1TTER OVER OPENING TYP.
TRIM COLOR.
O STUCtO HD FOAM TRIM BAND TYP.
O7 GLAZING TYP., MULLIONS TRIM COIOR.
O STUCCO FOAM DESIGN OR ARTWORK
O9 ALUMINUM PICNEf RAIL, TRIM COIOR
10 TRI-COLOREDCANOPY
11 DECORATIVE OHD FOR CONDRIONED TRASH RM
72 COVERED ENTRY WAY
73 IXISTING QUALITY INN
t4 IXISTING ECONO LODGE
15 CURVED TOP AT END OF WALL
16 DECORATIVE BRACNET, TiIIM COLOR.
7� DECOM7IVE METAL SCREEN, TRIM COLOR.
Roof: Berridge Metal
Roof - Cotonial Red
Trim: White Duck
$W7010
Field: Ambitious Amber
SW6366
Base: Toasty
SW6095
- � - ----_..._.. .
Percentaee MArMitenural Decoranon Ver Elevat�on
( Total Square I iotal 5quare Goohge of IPercentage of Eieration A�
BulldingElevation Footage5hownon ArchitecturalDecontion/ Architech�al0ecoration/
South 19,389 12,504 66E9%
West 17,950 1D,775 60.03%
""ArchitecturalDe rtionandwindowsinduderGlazing,sidingglassdoorsandnon�glazed
w�ndowope ngsw'ththe�rrespechvetnmpieces;Awn�ngz,TnmBandz,Trellisez,5tanding
Sram Metal rools, Decoratrve Roof and Awmng Brackets. Demrative Mechamral Endowre.
Decorative Metal Screens, louvered Openiogs. 8ahama Shutters, Oecoretive Stu<m aod Balw
h'.]I�InQS.
NORTH ELEVATI�N
SCALE: 1 /32" = 1'-0"
w w- --. ._.OVERALLNEK�IROi&1ftdNG
�;1
b
...,�__'_ _._..____ lOVOFPMMEf •
____ mn w aoa� sue -. . � i_
----�-�.t!-��-- -----
r.o. rroo� sue
b m
--------�-Q!�m�ROan -----------"._--L-�••�
4 i
b
_�_�__,.,,., f 174-0' . .
ulnnoort ---�---.- °."'��..� -'
b ___
____�, j. t09'd —_ '__" __�_"�
�1rnFtoon r—
4 �
e �
a
---- �.
__.�___1�,�.�� __ ._. -
b I :
_ �
---^-�-�Q'��p --'----'--'-'-._. �..
!
b�
-� .� � �rioae ----------------� � •-
I
b �
� � � �
. _ .__.;A �4 6
-'-�-�" erN no'aa —
_-- c ..
e o--
�"�" m�irioa -- -� , i
_._ -- --- ----- `-
-
� m-t� � ` �
. ._�; , _ u�0 �
+� � u p ! ... . .
_—.� ''-.^`--vr.��---'---- . . _.
� 16 y
l
-_�_ .�-,�.�,+�iiFi�---,.'
b �
_—_._—�-? m-�-�if� ._...._ _ . . . .. . . ' .
OOa
_"___"'_'�._�.1Z4_,..._�._,...._:�- ..___.. . ..:.. ._.'_
neo naat
YE13:8iE1i1� 12 `.
� I._
�::� ,.L�1.`.tr�"�EkQ9R _-.,_..»_ .......___'_ __..........._.._..
'k
� �
��� �1135TFLWP i ..i ... --�
_. ...19E9�
�
���� ■� ��,
Q
■�■ ■e ��1
��� �� ��r
� r� ���
��■ ��� ��� �� ��
�� �� r�:, ������
i� 0 �
���� ■ ��:�'� �0�����
���� �� ���� ��
� .,.� �w n
,._ ,�.
i�1,k i
�� ``�#
�_..� � ._. : ��11
� �'� � � � � t ���R
I1 � i,�1�
��
����._ �: i
�� �� � �� . ��
@ :t'� �� i ��...i„ � ���
� •..,,. ___.___.____._.___.__
���� N
y�1�� O
�'' ___.. _ .�°-�-*-----'�--'
•�� �
' rde �
.-�"- . .....�. n,.:r'i
+� �.
� -
� _ �
_ .�.._
, _.�.... .....£._-. ..__._J. . ;.
MARCH 3, 2014 SUMBITTAL FOR DRC ,
Santiesteban
. ` Associates
� � � Y �� � � ��a�, � �
��������il� ,�.��LI(( �'� I�� �sR.H�aaa���ia��u�F��3eoe
\�� U �-� � �'� no:813.25t.7AA4 Fa.r. R�1.i53.Ot10
CC � o , - v,.taa Arc.com
STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES '" �� � r i ; ; ��. �
1 , � � � �' � SHEET
$ _ �� ��I�II 9 � � ��i � � ��' ,
BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION o 0 635 Gutfview Blvd: '' - ,`- � Clearwater Beach, FL A2Q. 01 a
.
Color Swatches
(Sherwin Williams)
Roof: Berridge Metal
Roof - Colonial Red
�
Trim: White Duck
SW7010
'�� GENERAL NOT6:
'�. OA GARAGE IS AW OPEN GARAGE WRH 20% OVEN
...... O 10'� 7' MINIMUM SPEARATION FROM EXISTING
, BUILDINGS TO PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE
���. KEV NOTES:
'���, 1O PAINTED STU<CO TYP.
'� O PAINTED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITH TRIM • NO
GLAZING 7YP. @ PARKING GARAGE, TRVA Ca.OR
�,. O3 ALUMINUM TRELLIS, TRIM COLOR.
� O4 SfANDING SEAM METAL ROOF 7YP.
. O5 ALUMINUM SMUT7ER OVER OPENING TYP.
TRIM COIOfi.
� O6 SNCCO HO FOAM TRIM BAND TYP.
, O7 GLAZING TYP., MULUONS TRIM COLOR.
�, O8 STUCCO FOAM DESIGN OR ARTWORK
O9 ALUMINUM PICKEf RAIL, TRIM COLOR
I.. 10 TRI�COIORED CANOPY
���. i t DECORATIVE OHD Fat CONDITIONED TRASM RM
� 12 COVERED ENTRY WAY
��. 13 IXISTING QUALITY INN
I., 14 IXISTING ECONO LODGE
��.. I S CURVED TOP AT END OF WALL
j t6 DECORATNE BRACKET, TRIMCOIOR.
�! 17 OECORATIYE METAL SCREEN, TRIM COLOR.
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1 /32" = 1'-0"
Field: Ambitious Amber
SW63b6
Base: Toasty
SW6095
Pemn e M Nd�itec[ural Demretlon Per Elewtlon
_ 6 {
Total Square Totai Square Footage oi Percentage of Elevation As �� � � j...
BuildingElevation Footage5hownon ArchitecturalDecoration/ ArchitecturalDewratioN L!—' - �
�Elewtion Wintlows Windows . . .— .—. —.. -- '----'---------- — . '
Nor[h 19,d55 1i,715 60.22% � i�
East ll,954 13,236 73J2%
Sou[h 19.389 12�504 64A9% __ ___ . ..___ ._" .. "__'—_.—_—.__" .'',,�
West 17,950 10,775 60.03% "�� �
"Aahiteaual0emranonandwindowzindudes:Glaiing,slidingglassdoorsandnon-glazed �— �
window openings with theirrespective tnm pieces, Awnings,Tnm Bands, Trellises, Standing .. ... '��
._.._. .---- ---- --� ----------- — '—
Seam Metal rools, Dewratwe Roo( and Awniog Bradets, Dewrative Mechanical Enciosure, ��
Demrative Metal Screens, tou�ered Openingz, Bahama Shutters, Oecorativc Scucco and Balwny
Railin z, ��
�
. . . . . . . . ... .._"_ ._" _ "_"__._...___..L._ _ i.:.�
I � I;
'_.'_ __ '__"_______.__ _ — I_'_
..._____"______'__'_'_—_—_—"—"—'_'_.._...—___._.__.._.—_. t'_""_"". __ "___—___'�_"_ _ �'..�
a `' _
_ .... .._. ___. _... _ _.. ... _--._. --_ ..—" �
_ — -- -- i �—
� °— � �'
__..--.—"....'--....... ---�----�---- —�- --- ------. _ - ----- -- - — '—
�--� . °��1 � � ' ' � _� � { ;
' __ ... .. ---- -- -- — --- . .e-_
� —_ _ _ i -n ;fi
o-- , ,
��
r e '
� ; : i I � ti 76
� �
� T ����1 l�i� _�—. -�_�--_ __ _ _ _s—-—
� ' �
'�
EMTRv
� � a, �
"i`�o o _
0
5'.�, _""—_"—""_'"—'"—' _"�14��.'
iRM R�N
t
'�- si4_
� - ------------ ------
tm+noon
! ;
n.: _ ..--_—.._..___. ._. �09:-
� uin ��'�' �
F
;
. _ . . _. . _ _ . ._99.�
, �y ._... .ifnirroon
m'i i
�* '- -------�---------i0n� oOpY�
!
!
74�P}�
"—" '------- —
9TN ROOPY
� � !
� :
C x= ! ___ _ ____ _� .
etN ttooR�
� ` f
,
_ _____..—iixnoat�
� �
„ � ... _ �T.-Q .
T � ..bTN ROOR Y
ji "�11.� ����
I � � .,.�. I .'�I �.: i �R ,
III i I�!I� °°"��
� .��a ��.r �
�� � s � �n�a$
;�II � ���, — — d°��
MARCH 3, 2014 SUMBITTAL FOR DRC .
_; � � �� Santiesteban
, '� %' ,,�j������ �� r�'����� � ,; Associates
,�
� �,
' �1.�%:r�l !�(:'r �( _/Lr i � � t
A R C H I T E C T 5=
,..,��� � Ir �l�/ ��� ! SS HowardA�c. la!npe.r133666
`, ° ", , .� AtI.751.188a Fa.�. 81?.253.i1110
K V O ' ��� ��� , �..Szr�Ar<.fom
STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES a !� �% �r�/1������,1�;,��, '� SHEET
W i !I `,�' C �� ���� �/L;%C�'�i%'t✓� i
BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION o 0 635 Gulfview Btvd:� -: ��-' ° Clearwater Beach, FL A20. �2a
GENERAL NOTES_
O GARAGE �5 AN OPEN GARAGE WRH 2(1% OPEN
O10'-T MINIMUM SPEARATION FROM EXISTING
BUILDINUS TO PROPOSED BUILDING STRUCTURE
lSEY NOTES:
1� PNNTED STUCCO TYP.
O PAIN7E0 AIUMINUM FRAME$ WITH TRIM � NO
GLAZING TYP. � PARKING GARAGE, TRIM COLOR
O3 AWMINUM TRELLIS, TRIM COLOR.
O4 STANDING SFAM METAI. ROOf TYO.
OS ALUMINl1M SHUIIER OVER OPENING TYP.
rnue co�oa.
O6 STUCCO HD FOAM TRIM BAND TYP.
O7 GLAZING TYP., MULLIONS TRIM COLOR.
O STUCCO FOAM DESIGN OR ARTWORN
O9 ALUMINUM PICKET RAII., TRIM COLOR
10 TRI�COLORED CANOW
11 DECORATIVE OHD FOR CONDITIONED TRASH RM
72 COVERED ENTRY WAY
73 IXISTING QUALITY INN
t� IXISTING ECONO LODGE
15 CURYED TOP AT ENO OF WALL
16 DECORATIVE BRACNET, TRUA COLOR.
17 DECORATIVE MEfAL SCREEN, TIiIM COLOR.
Color Swatches
(Sherwin Williams)
Roof: Berridge Metal
Roof - Colonial Red
. � .. OvEMUNE�WrtOFlulLqNc
____ _.
H � �
` TOV OF PMMEf ��� .. •',"�'!' 4 ! .....
��
Trim: White Duck � - t , � ' � -- �-
SW%O�O ___. ._..,� y.-�7.0�imorsue_. _ _ __rara�sw ___._..� . � __ .r_ -_ ° -� __ ____.___.____._____-
�. __., b._j,.lti4. ..._. ..... _.___ ...._ ' '"_"_'a�---� �� ���.� ..—"_ .
� . .
4.r a �. s . . �. un� vwoe � - - . _. _— - — —' — —'— —' —
� �
� _� . j,1143'_ �. _.. �� � � � _ _ �� �_ . _ .._.._.._.._.."'_"'—
.e__.._"_"—.._..... _..._..._.._ ��. . � �� __..� ,_.. j
�E
.. .........__.. . � _E. .
trmnoai � �, � , -_ .
_ �.., . <. . - . .;, a � , � , i -- . � . _
.i b �-_-.. � � �� �
: � j�mifiooR _ - --- '- e -`�".' __ _"---- �—•`--- ---'-- ---'—
Field: Ambitious 4 �^� I � ' �_� �- �
Amber: SW6366 ° ti
. _ ._�,�.n�_ _ _ - -- - - - ----------��-
nn�tt0o� r�,, — -- .._. - . , . ... � -- ,---
p � � �� ��-- t
b �
__.. . _1_ _r�� � � . �e � e� . . ���_ � —' � _ _ _— _ _"_' _
_ - i � �� . _ � {---
,�,� --.__ ,
� 9
O
L � '' �I.v; ..�..._ � ,_ __ �_ . _ .__o_
�...._ ... _1'9�1NvaFiAOR � 6 . . ... —"—"—"—
..__ -.. �.'..
4 '
Base: Toasty -�-� � rm'Q,�--- ------- . ` �- ,- �il� .�� M . _ '
SW6095 � ' � �
- �---- - -- -
b �
...�.._.:�-�W� . _. - �: -.—"— "_"'__"—"___"_
7fNFL00R ;"` � .t. .. _ . .�." . ___.._ ._._'_.._._r__` T_'_."_' —
� ¢ ' , is�p � ` 9 � ia y 37.�f�j6 �
� " _ y�, . I ' � !A
� ��
_ , r'�� � � �� �� * ��±P,� ,
N� � ,, . .�,� u 1 � �
' IQ C � ?., � i. � .,..m... �: F � � � . s` '' _
r3�711�i100R �J ���� , �'� _ _..._...
u � ", ' 16
___—_'� B-0' ._ _ .. � '"" '
� '" .... ""
b .�� J . � -�i -.�' �� ' ='r '.'� . is[
� �
.. ..... .....�. . � {TM FLU011 .>» {� : .
b � �,. ,.�� .._,�, � i �' �" � p. ,.
1_ �
_ ' ' j..f.�I�. .__ .�. _ „ �
711D ROOR ^': • . ... _ . ' � _ '
:`
6 �: ` � ffi � � '^^� �� a .' �, � '� \J
._... b._,j..3NOR00R ...__ '. W '� _ _� �. . . ... ...
__.. �.-�.,�,-r.�.,�--__._ - - .
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1 /32" = 1'-0"
MARCH 3, 2014 SUMBITTAL FOR DRC / S d tl t 1 2 5 t 2 b d tl
,� �� ���;��Y��%�/ ,>; ,��f`� uv��, , ( � � � Associates
�i �i ������J�/ C� r���%\� l i! li �` f A R C H I T E C T$=
��l � J ,■■ e 5 5 Noward A�e IaniVe. FL 13606
STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES ��: an.z5� ,na< F<,.: a�a :sa a�,o
W �•
�� � � -� - CR �.Saa prr.com
BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTR TI �� 635 Gulfview Blv I--���� ``�� �-� ��1��� �`� � SHEEf
U C O N o o d. ___ C l e a r w a t e r B e a c h, F L Q 2 �. 0 3 a
Color Swatches
(Sherwin Witliams)
Roof: Berridge Metal
Roof - Colonial Red
� .
Trim: White Duck
51N7010
cFUCae� NOTES:
O GARAGE IS AN OPEN GARAGE WITH 20% OPEN
O10'-7' MINIMUM SPEARATION FROM EXISTiNG
BUILDINGS TO PROPOSED BUILDING STRI1CTl1RE
. tO PAINiED STUCCO TYP.
'.. O PAINiED ALUMINUM FRAMES WITM TRIM - NO
� GLAZING 7YP. � PAiIKING WRAGE, TRIM COLOR
� O3 ALUMINUMTREWS,TPoMCOLOR.
� sraNar+c s�n+ �ru nooF Tvv.
5O ALUMINUM SHUTTER OVER OPENING TYP.
TRIM COIOR.
�6 STUCCO HD FOAM TRIM BAND TYP.
� O7 GLAZING TYP., MUlUONS TRIM COLOR.
� O8 SiUCCO FOAM DESIGN OR ARTWORK
O9 ALUMINUM PICKET RAIL, TRIM COLOR
10 TRI-COLOIIED CANOPY
11 DECORATIVE OHD FOR CONDITIONED TRASH RM
12 COVERED ENTRY WAY
73 IXISTING QUALITY INN
14 IXISTING ECONO IODGE
15 CURVED TOP AT END OF WALL
......., 16 DECORATIVE BRACKEf,TRIM COLOR.
�''��, 17 DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN, TRIM COLOR.
Field: Ambitious Amber Base: Toasty
SW63b6 SW6095
.� a�c�u nEwHr a euxnow
b
� roc a vMwcr .
s---:
_--___...-.._..-.r_f34'4 ------. rovaveoorsue _.. '�` �- . .
r.a.aaovsue _ . __.. ...____.__.—..—_ __�_.__ 4_.______.—_.________...__
� ¢ ',, .. ---
° �
___- __-__T_Y_,r,,114-0'-___..__ - ;
� � 7RXit00R ___.-.._ _ ..._... _...r._�. , .
� b � ^ RII
€ �_�.� �� .�;
m_.. .. .. . ._.t_.r.t.t9'V _ ..A.._..._..-"-"--�. � _..
/71X fi001t ' -"•-. - . . "-- �
_ .._.. - . .,_"_' _ _. _ ._-
yy(� b �
"' ..—.._..."'-'_�-�i`tt�Tl-iROGIt "—"____—_'—___'_—'__"___ _._. ... ......__. �.._—'__.._�"_—"___...._
� _.__. .... ... .
A �;
S b —�.
-.-.'�_�-�-�`-4G-0'- '-"-' -
iatal Square Total Square Footage ol Perzentage of ElevationA!
Building Elevation Footage Shown on ArchiteRUral Demrat�on/ Architecturai Decoration/
Elevafion Windows wndows
Nortfi 19.a55 11.715 6022%
West 17,950 10,775 60.03%
"•Arcfiftectual Derorotion and windows indudes. Glazfng, sl Idi ng glass doon ane non-glazed
window openings with [heir respective tnm pieces; Awnings, Trim 9antls, Tre Ilises, Standing
Seam Metal roofs, Decarznve Roof and Awning Braticets, Decwative Mechanical Endowre, _
Decoracive Wetal Scree�s, Louvered Openiogs, Bahama Shutters, Oecoretive Stuao antl 8alcony
'-"-"-_- _. -'._ .r. �...-- - ' . ...__.�.
� d nnin.aon -- i' - - — — — ---- --- --- --- -.._. _..__.._..—__._. ._ _ _
- - - �� j-- -� �- �o
'^ - � (JtiL��SNiAe
Q ----•--.r-��'— — — — __ __
_ ..__.._ _'
�mxnaoa- ---- _ -- — — — —' .__.. ._._—_
� ,
E b ° ,, j ;
'k"__ .3��..__.Y�.v�—ni�F�001�__. ...... ..._. ._. ...__9._ ' —"_' '___"_ �. _"_ _'. . __
u # a � � __ 1 ..
�� ��
--- = �--1�iFl.aat — — '—'— ---' —"—' —_— — ------ �— --'—
� b �
.
t b 7 i
� .__...__. __.r.r'7�IXf10011__..._ ___.___... . _...._.._� _.._.. _..._"'_"'� _'". " 7_""_.. ..
E � ' 2
W �
� tb
c _._._ - �-7` TM� ,�_ � , �
- :�- �.- : _� . ..
�------------------._..---------' v
_.----. _. . __.....--l.s�in�rtodi
b
__—___`__.___-t--fAXiL001t ���
�
W
_..__.__._ }.l•�'r�- -
4
b
WEST ELEVAT101�-� � - �-���� _ ____
.� b .S'�6'r/F 73: b.i.E. 13'�
� b.T
SCALE: 1 /32" = 1'-0" "aT1A0R"'''a'
MARCH 3, 2014 SUMBITTAL FOR DRC
STEVE PAGE - PAGE COMPANIES g W
BOB LYONS - COASTAL CONSTRUCTION � o
;
�, Y � �, � , ;;c;i%/� ,
' `%4�U�� ',�� � � (%/ �✓n � ;J i � ;��
/ �' 1/
7� �� o
//j � /7 � _, n
(( , � �l�%C.�� � R
635 Gulfview Blvd.�� ���������� �� Clearwater Beach, FL
�
.._�---_._...._. _..
�� - '�Santiesteban
�� Associates
,■■ ! A R C H I T E C T 5=
S 5, Ho ard A� 1arnVe. FL 33b06
��� i^, _ 817 75i.i8&4 Fax� Ai3.]53Ait0
. ��.S���Ar�,tt�m
SHEET
A20.04a