The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2014-03006NACNIiEC1S 119 ENSi iHlLUlBH DBIUE 6AEEHUIItE SOUiH CNBOIINH 296U5 ._ -- ---------- ---- _.. 864 3�o-zss2 wilkpoe@charter.net --_ __ _- ------------------' 22 BAY ESPLANADE FLD2014-03006 1 DQ Corner Stone Zoning: Tourist Atlas #: 258A March 10, 2014 City of Clearwater Planning and Development Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: DQ Cornerstone 22 Bay Esplanade Clearwater Beach, FL To whom it may concern: vRlpqVqL � MAf� 112014 �NG D� C,�IY OF CLI��►� FLD2014-03006 This letter is in response to comments made on 03/07/14 Planning Review 1. A tree survey by a licensed Arborist has been provided and attached to the submittal documents. 2. The Flexibility Criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, Section 2-803D {1-5) has been addressed and attached to the submittat documents 3. A Flexibility Criteria for Comprehensive Landscaping Application has been attached to the submittal that conforms to the Flexibility Criteria for Comprehensive Landscape Program, Section 3-1202.G (1-5} Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns Sincerely, � � �� James E. Wilkerson, A.I.A. (FI license No. AR 0015603) Wilkerson Architects, LLC v ` f .' �. �� - �� ✓ . _� � �° •' • : ' e • ° 4! . e t� *e+ � ! , . . �..�°, � , . � . �i • ` '` � . �i � . ' / u � . ,, '.��i� �Y A • /ti/ ,'. �� ,�'�[j.J: � + • `'' `;`t ' � �; . , � )f � . 'Y t �'h "k' ! i`'� t ,.;� y �� . �� , ��M1 .. Q � . m ��a. �, � � � �, w�<x� ,� �. `agw4n,±:. w �-"x.y w,„,�`" � � � :,,� ia�� r �. � �'� l i"� � w.��, _ �� } �•.,��„ � , t : f�l ;A`ti,'v1,`:AS <� �)1 4�i�? YrPtif�'`4i March 7, 2014 James C. Wilkcrson, AIA Wilkerson �lrchitects, LLC' t 19 East "I��llulah Drive Cireenville, SC ?9605 � I �� °- c� .�� .�� .� � .� ~r .�J �. J?t, � t1��ii, )� j��>�,�1 i+�,�_if i;��S il� Ik f�li!.+'I� ��3�'�ti t i`� ��1; ��,I�.IPtt �4.�,',��,��,,#il�lt! �,��.1iH��,�.3!I:JIl::I.1 �Stf �.f i..f.�i,l:t�,0.�!�ili.,}'I.ultii-a 5).-y(, . . . -. , _. . . i i�! ?� 1'V i( )\h , )' �, �17�_�-:'1b � E' \ � ( ._ , li� �-�E�(1;1 Re: I�etter uf Incompleteness, 22 Bay F.splanade FLD2014-03006 Uear Mr. Wilkerson: 'I'he Plannin� Staff has entered your application into thc Uepartment's tiling system and assigned the case number: E�LD2014-03006. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staffhas determined that the applic�tion is Incotnplctc with thc following comments: Ylannin�, Review 1. The Landscape Plan identifiies that existing trees will be removed as part of the project, hnwever, a tree survey prepared by a licensed arborist was not submitted with the application. Z. Flexibility Criteria for Comprehcnsive Infil! Rcdevelapment Project, Section Z-803.D(1-S) needs to be addressed. 3. FleYibility Criteria for Cc�rnprehensive [,andscape Program, Section 3-12U2.G(1-5) needs to be addressed. Scction 4-1008 of the Comrnunity Uevelopment Code states that if an application is deemed incornplete, the deficiencies oFthe application shall be spccifed by Staff. No further development review r�ction shatl be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed c�mplete. Please resubmit by March 1 l, 2014 at NOUN. l�uilure ta da so will result in thc applicatian bcing withdrawn. " Should you need fiirther �ssistance, please contact Melissa Hauck-f3aker, Planner Il, at (727) 562-4567 x2855 or via email at ��s±.�li��-;v3.1t�:��c l. �h,�k��r tt��it��c:Meac;v;i�� .��. Sincerely yours, ��.�.<. �s..a. �"�'`�," ` ��''..,_,_. Melissa Elauck-I3aker, Planner fl Pla�ming and Development Depart�nent CC: Mathura Prpperties #5, I.LC �� . . � �' , — Coc��q, •. �.► M� � r . +f �At Fuit Serv�ce Certif�eci Arbonst Tree Survey 22 Bay Esplanade W . Clearwater Beach, Fl. 3376? 1. Species- Sabal palmetto 2. Height- Approximately 12'-14' 3. DBH- 1 T 4. Age— Estimated to be 25-30 years old. 5. Comments- One established Saba1 palmetto on site. Growing next to a power pole at the southeast corner of the lot. inside of the right of way. Nothing remarkable about this palm. Prepar o 9-14 by Matt Neal If Trees Could Talk... ISA Certified Arborlst FL-5353A LL ° C earwater U Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application Attached Dwellings, Mixed-Uses or Non-Residentia� Uses IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPIICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTIVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION. ALL APPLICATIONS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITHIN ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMI7TAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. tHE APPLICANT, BY FILING THIS APPLICATION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. FIRE DEPT PRELIMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE: $200 APPLICATION FEE: $1,205 PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Mathura Properties #5, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 1901 South John Young Parkway, Suite 101, Kissimmee, FL 34741 PHONE NUMBER: (321) 284-4631 EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL: ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY PARCEL NUMBER(S): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: cdmathura@hotmail.com James E. Wilkerson, A.I.A. / Wilkerson Architects, ��C 119 East Tallulah Drive, Greenville, SC 29605 864-370-2582 wilkpoe@charter.net 22 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767 05-29-15-16 362-008-0120 Lot12, Block 8, Plat Book 11 and Page 5 of Pinellas County Restaurant - Ice Cream Shop 1,500 sf (gross floor area under AC) ice cream parlour (one story building) Specifically identify the request designed mainly to serve walk-up customers from nearby beaches and resorts. (include al! requested code flexibility; Code deviation - Lot size is only 4,350 SF, which is less than S,OOOSF required. e.g., reduction in required number of Request approval of 24ft flat roof / 28ft parapet height. (Building raised on timber piles per parking spaces, height, setbacks, lot size, lot widrh, speci�ic use, erc.): Section 3109 of the Pinellas Gulf Beaches Construction Code) Original approved ht: 15.33 flat roo / 17.33 top o parapet Planning 8 Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-862-4865 Page 1 of 8 Revised 01/12 ► � , � , LL ° � earwater U Planning & Develapment Department Flexible Development Application Data Sheet PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS FILLED OUT, IN ITS ENTIRETY. FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS FORM WILL RESULT IN YOUR APPLICATION BEING FOUND INCOMPLETE AND POSSIBLY DEFERRED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION CYCLE. ZONING DISTRICT: FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING USE (currently existing on site): PROPOSED USE (new use, if any; plus existing, if to remain): SITE AREA: 4,350sf Tourist District (T), Old Florida District Resort Facilities High (RFH) Un-built Dairy Queen Ice Cream Restaurant sq. ft. 0•099 acres GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage of all buildings): Existing: � sq. ft. Proposed: 1,205 sq. ft. Maximum Allowable: 1,860 sq. ft. GROSS FLOOR AREA (total square footage devoted to each use, if there will be multiple uses): First use: 1,205 sq. ft. Second use: n�a sq. ft. Third use: n�a sq. ft. FLOOR AREA RATIO (total square footage of all buildings divided by the total square footage of enfire site): Existing: n/a Proposed: 0.28 Maximum Allowable: 1.0 BUILDING COVERAGE/FOOTPRINT (15t floor square footage of all buildings): Existing: n�a sq. ft. ( % of site) Proposed: 1205 sq. ft. ( 2�•� 40 of site) Maximum Permitted: 1,860 sq. ft. ( 42•7 �o of site) GREEN SPACE WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREA (green space within the parking lot and interior of site; not perimeter buffer): Existing: 4,350 sq. ft. ( �� % of site) Proposed: 3��5 sq. ft. ( 30•9 % of site) VEHICULAR USE AREA'parking spaces, drive aisles, loading area): Exisfing: n/a sq. ft. ( Proposed: 0 sq.ft. ( 4�0 of site) 90 of site) Ptanning & Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 8 Revised 01/12 v �` ' � IMPERVi0U5 SURFACE RATIO (total square footage of impervious areas divided by the totai square footage of entire site): Existing: � Proposed: 3 0 •�j. �Q Maximum Permitted: � y �%J DENSITY (units, rooms or beds per acrej: Existing: I�i /Q Proposed: j� /�4 Maximum Permitted: r,(�� OfF-STREET PARKING: Existing: (j Proposed: Minimum Required: � BUILDtNG HEIGHT: Existing: j�j /� Proposed: 2,$ FT Maximum Permitted: jC� N7" WNAT IS THE ESTIMATED TOTACVALUE OF THE PROIECT UPON COMPLETION? ZONING OISTRICTS FOR ALL ADJACENT PRQPERTY: rvo�cr,: T'a�rv'�5f- (T) South; TJ Jtt� S T �"r'� East: T�Jt2,�ST CT� west: TD�)t2.15T �T STATE OF FIORIDA, COUNTY OF PINElLAS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that ail Sworn to and subscribed before me this �� t 1� day of representations made in this application are true and rF_� r�,� 3 r � � U i� accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize � ' . to me and/or by City representatives to visit and phatograph the ��-� � r' �! � �� 1� �'L�r�j who is personally known has property described in this appli�ation. produced �" L� �-- as identification. Signature of property owner or representative ' r: tiJ..�...t.. �.� L . ��.�i'� `� �. Notary public, My commission expires: �J ► r� E a- � �- `'' � �, � ptPAY Pva�� VICKY L. KOEHLKE '?* :° : kotary Public • State of Florida ;�, o�; My Comm. Expires Jan 12, 2016 i 1r p ,�. '�•.;�?FF��Qo Commission # EE 159381 Planning 8� Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tei: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 3 of 8 Revised 01N2 ti 1 l LL o Planning & Development Department � earwater Flexible Develo ment A lication P pP U Site Plan Subrnittal Package Check list IN ADDITION TO THE COMPLETED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT (FLD) APPLICATION, ALL FLD APPLICATIONS SHALL INCLUDE A SITE PLAN SUBMITfAL PACKAGE THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND/OR PLANS: ❑ Responses to the flexibility criteria for the specific use(s) being requested as set forth in the Zoning District(s) in which the subject property is located. The attached Flexible Development Application Flexibility Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. ❑ Responses to the General Applicability criteria set forth in Section 3-914.A. The attached Flexible Development Application General Applicability Criteria sheet shall be used to provide these responses. D A signed and sealed survey of the property prepared by a registered land surveyor including the location of the property, dimensions, acreage, location of all current structures/improvements, location of all public and private easements including official records book and page numbers and street right(s)-of-way within and adjacent to the site. ❑ If the application would result in the removal or relocation of mobile home owners residing in a mobile home park as provided in F.S. § 723.083, the application must provide that information required by Section 4-202.A.5. ❑ If this application is being submitted for the purpose of a boatlift, catwalk, davit, dock, marina, pier, seawall or other si milar marine structure, then the application must provide detailed ptans and specifications prepared by a Florida professional engineer, bearing the seal and signature of the engineer, except signed and sealed plans shall not be required for the repair or replacement of decking, stringers, railing, lower landings, tie piles, or the patching or reinforcing of existing piling on private and commercial docks. ❑ A site plan prepared by a professional architect, engineer or landscape architect drawn to a minimum scale of one inch equals 50 feet on a sheet size not to exceed 24 inches by 36 inches that includes the following information: ❑ Index sheet of the same size shall be included with individual sheet numbers referenced thereon. ❑ North arrow, scale, location map and date prepared. ❑ Identification of the boundaries of phases, if development is proposed to be constructed in phases. ❑ Location of the Coastal Construction Control line (CCCL), whether the property is located within a Special Flood Hazard Area, and the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) of the property, as applicable. ❑ Location, footprint and size of all existing and proposed buildings and structures on the site. ❑ Location and dimensions of vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, both on-site and off-site, with proposed points of access. ❑ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, fire hydrants and seawalls and any proposed utility easements. 0 Location of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities as well as a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including calculations. Additional data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual may be required at time of building construction permit. ❑ Location of solid waste collection facilities, required screening and provisions for accessibility for collection. ❑ Location of off-street loading area, if required by Section 3-1406. ❑ All adjacent right(s)-of-way, with indication of centerline and width, paved width, existing median cuts and intersections and bus shelters. ❑ Dimensions of existing and proposed lot lines, streets, drives, building lines, setbacks, structural overhangs and building separations. ❑ Building or structure elevation drawings that depict the proposed building height and building materials. Planning 8 Development Department,100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 4 of 8 Revised 01/12 A, 0 Typical floor plans, including floor plans for each floor of any parking garage. ❑ Demolition plan. ❑ Identification and description of watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, specimen trees, and other environmentally sensitive areas. ❑ If a deviation from the parking standards is requested that is greater than 509� (excluding those standards where the difference between the top and bottom of Che range is one parking space), then a parking demand study will need to be provided. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Please see the adopted Parking Demand Study Guidelines for further information. ❑ A tree survey showing the location, DBH and species of all existing trees with a DBH of four inches or more, and idenfifying those trees proposed to be removed, if any. ❑ A tree inventory, prepared by a certified arborist, of all trees four inches DBH or more that reflects the size, canopy, and condition of such trees may be required if deemed applicable by staff. Check with staff. ❑ A Traffic tmpact Study shall be required for all proposed developments if the total generated net new trips meet one or more of the following condifions: ■ Proposal is expected to generate 100 or more new trips in any given hour (directional trips, inbound or outbound on the abutting streets) and/or 1,000 or more new trips per day; or ■ Anticipated new trip generation degrades the level of service as adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan to unacceptable levels; or ■ The study area contains a segment of roadway and/or intersection with five reportabte accidents within a prior twelve month period, or the segment and/or intersection exists on the City's annual list of most hazardous locations, provided by the City of Clearwater Police Department; or ■ The Traffic Operations Manager or their designee deems it necessary to require such assessment in the plan review process. Examples include developments that are expected to negatively impact a constrained roadway or developments with unknown trip generation and/or other unknown factors. ❑ A landscape plan shall be provided for any project where there is a new use or a change of use; or an existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25% or more of the valuation of the principal structure as reflected on the property appraiser's current records, or if an amendment is required to an exisfing approved site plan; or a parking lot requires additional landscaping pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, Division 14. The landscape plan shall include the following information, if not otherwise required in conjunction with the application for development approval: ❑ Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names. O Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and location, including drip line. ❑ Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips, and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular use areas. ❑ Location of existing and proposed strudures and improvements, including but not limited to sidewalks, walls, fences, pools, patios, dumpster pads, pad mounted transformers, fire hydrants, overhead obstructions, curbs, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, storm drains, seawa�ls, utility easements, treatment of all ground surfaces, and any other features that may influence the proposed tandscape. ❑ Location of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing. ❑ Drainage and retention areas, including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations. ❑ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers including sight triangles, if any. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 5 of 8 Revised 01/12 LL ° � earwate� Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � General Applicability Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE SIX (6j GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAIL, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THIS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Yes, the proposed 1,250 sq-ft ice cream parlor development will blend in well with surrounding uses in the Touist (� zoning district 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent tand and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Proposed ice cream parlour will enhance the surrounding area and business by proving additional options for the locals and tourists to eat and enjoy 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed ice cream parlour develoment wil have on-site dry retention pond, water and sanitary sewer system so no adverse impact is expected to occur to adjacent properties or persons 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed ice cream parlour will utilize nearby public parking facilities and no on-site parking is proposed. This development is generally not a drive to destination shop but serves mainly pedestrian walk-ups from adjacent beaches and hotel tourist and customers. A parking Demand Study report has been completed to support the site development 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Yes, the proposed ice cream parlour is consistent with the adjacent parcel uses within the Tourist (T) District 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Yes, the proposed ice cream parlour is designed to minimize impact to adjacent properties and will be developed similar to other family oriented type businesses within the Tourist (T) District areas. Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 6 of 8 Revised 01112 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) � Provide compiete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA — Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detaii: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The existing iot size is only 4,350 SF and will need to be developed as a Comprehensive Infili Re-development. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goais and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as weil as with the generai purpose, intent a�d basic planning objedives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district The proposed ice cream parlour and use are within the ailowabie density and is aiso compatible with the City of Ciearwater Comp Plan and Future Land Use. 3. The development or redevelopment wiil not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed ice cream parfour will not impede the development of the surrounding propertfes in regard to building helght, setbacks, and site design requirements. 4. Adjoining properties wili not suffer substantiai detriment as a result of the proposed development. The adjoining properties will not be impacted adverseiy by the proposed ice cream pariour development. 5. The proposed use shali otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, wiil not substantially after the essentia! use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate comp�iance with one or more of tne foliowing objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexibie standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a sign�cant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use pian amendment and rezoning would resuit in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Ali conditions above are met by this development. There is no re-zoning or land use change proposed on this project. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated comp(iance with ali cf the following design abjectives: a. The proposed development wiii not impede fhe normai and orderiy development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed deveiopment complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the estabiished or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visuaify interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: 0 Changes in horizontai building planes; ❑ Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, raifings, awnings, etc.; 0 Variety in materials, colors and textures; ❑ Distinctive fenestration patterns; 0 Building stepbacks; and ❑ Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. All the above conditions are met thru the proposed Site Pian and Buiiding Elevation plan. The only flexibility development code requested is to allow devetopment on the small lot area of 4,350 SF. . _ __ _ . _ __ _ __ _ C:\Users\wifkp_000\DocumentslAUTOCAD\DQtCORE 0\CLEARWATER\FORMSIOLD APPLICATION\DA SCOOP ICE CREAM PARLOUR - Comprehensive Infill Project Application (FINAL 08-02-10).doc Page 4 of 8 � ° � �arwater Planning & Development Department Flexible Development Application � Affidavit to Authorize Agent/Representative 1. Provide names of ail property owners on deed - PRINT full names: � e+�p.N `�. M pr T1+UR. �4 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title hoider(s) of the following described property: 2 2 SH�( �� Pt��b c 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for (describe requestj: svs�' vv��M�r� r-�� '�cct3c,c=' F3�'v�l.vPN►c�T' r��vt�' 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: tT �1:1 � C`• 1lU`t L.K.ts:iz�� OF UJ t L.K�tZ'6U� }�RC.f4'{T�'�l . L,I.C... as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (I/we), #he undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. pz�: ��r�� ..�.., Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, AN OFFICER DULY COMMISSIONED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIQA, ON THIS d�l t fti DAY OF F�- h r v c� �` �! �3' Q f� , , PERSONALLY APPEARED '� � y` d P� Y �-1 d- �- j��.'f c� WHO NAVING BEEN FfRST DULY SWORN �?�� UNDERSTANDS THE CONTENTS OF THE AFFIDAVIT THAT HE/SHE SIGNED. �,?o��"� °�B<<-,; VICKY l. KOENLKf Notary Public - State o1 Florida =� }�c My Comm. Ezpires Jan 12, 2016 ��y-t_-t.-�-t�. �-- � �.�`� �o'�o�F„�;`A�� Commission #� EE 159381 Notary Public Signature Notary SeaUStamp My Commission Expires: � d n • � � , � � � �r Planning & Develapment Depa►tment, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Ciearwater, FL 33756, Tei: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 � Page 8 of 8 Revised 01H2 ° ater � C earw U�...' `�'"+ r''"�"-,!"�°•.�..�°''' ,�' Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION. ANY MISLEADING, DECEPTiVE, INCOMPLETE OR INCORRECT INFORMATION MAY INVALIDATE YOUR APPLICATION J ALL APPLICA7i01VS ARE TO BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND CORRECTLY, AND SUBMITTED IN PERSON (NO FAX OR DELIVERIES) TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON THE SCHEDULED DEADLINE DATE. A TOTAL OF 11 COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 �RIGINAL AND 10 COPIES) AS REQUIRED WITH{N ARE TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE. SUBSEQUENT SUBMITTAL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BbARD, IF NECE5SARY, WILL REQUIRE 15 COMPLETf SETS OF PIANS AND APPLICATION MATERIALS (1 ORIGINAL AND 14 COPIES). PLANS AND APPIICATiONS ARE REQU{RED TO BE COLLATED, STAPLED AND FOLDED INTO SETS. THE APPLICANT, BY FILING TWiS APPLIG4TION, AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. PROPERTY OWNER (PER DEED): Mathura Properties #5, LLC MAIIING ADDRESS: 1901 S. John Young Pkwy, Suite 101, Kissimmee, FL 34741 PHONE NUMBER: 321-284-4631 EMAIL: AGENT OR REPRESENTATIVE: MAIIING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: EMAII: ADDRESS C?F SUBJECT PROPERTY: cd math u ra @hotma i I. co m James E. Wilkerson / Wilkerson Architects, LLC 119 East Tallulah Drive, Greenville, sC 29605 864-370-2582 wilkpoe@charter.net 22 Bay Esplanade DESCRiPTION OF REQUEST: 1,205 sf (gross floor area under AC) ice cream pariour (one story building} Specifically identijy the repuesr esigned mainiy to serve wa -up customers rom nearby beac es an resorts. (include all requested code flexfbillty; Code deviation - Lot size is only 4,350 SF, which is less than 5,OOOSF required. e.g., reduction !n required number of Request approval of 24ft flat roof / 28ft parapet height. (Building raised on timber piles per parking spaces, height setbacks, lot size, tot width, spec�c use, etc.): Section 3109 of the Pinellas Gulf Beaches Construction Code) Original approved ht: 15.33 flat roof / 17.33 top of parapet sa�1�{n �+.• a't taa (�r�e�tvi J l e STATE OF�FkBRt@�; COUNTY OFPtNftdCS"' 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all Sworn to and subscribed before me this loth day of representations made in this application are true and March 2014 , to me and/or by accurate to t�ie best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the .lames E. Wilkerson who is personally known has property described in this application. � produced SO(,t-� k GLr�lrad �vi v e r�� iC �'v� Sc, as ic��iH��riqr�. i /' �/ �`�,�o'��'�' �' �UM� �/� .�� , /,/ �o�d�,r'�c < <��0�7.� r�� l.r_fLro�.rn_¢�" � ?v :'�aTAp�_'•. of property ow`ner or representative Notary public, � � t� � �...� My commission expires: ) Z.'ZI /LQZL;� � . Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33758, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-56�2'� AaO,`�� Page 1 of 2 Revised 01/1� ., : ;� � � r � � earwate U � ✓, Planning & Development Department Comprehensive Landscaping Application Flexibility Criteria PROVIDE COMPLETE RESPONSES TO EACH OF THE FIVE (5) FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA EXPLAINING HOW, IN DETAII, THE CRITERION IS BEING COMPLIED WITH PER THI5 COMPREHENSIVE IANDSCAPING PROPOSAL. 1. Architectural Theme: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be designed as a part of the architecturai theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materiais of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Yes, The proposed project "DQ Cornerstone" Landscape plan design will provide additionai landscaping along the frontage (street side), sides and rear. Additional canopy trees and palm trees are proposed above the minimum landscape standards. Please see landscape plan 2. Lighdng. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscaping program is automatically controlled so that the lighfing is turned off when the business is closed. All lighting, including approved turtle friendly spec, shall be automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed 3. Communiry Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Yes, The additional landscaping along the frontage will enhance the Community Character 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscaping program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the praperty in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Yes, The additional landscaping above the standard codes will will have beneficial impact on the project adjacent parcels and surrounding areas. 5. Specia! Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Yes, The additional landsca�ing is consistent with the project "Beach by Design" r�quirements with regards to the quantity and quality of the proposed landscaping on-site Planning & Development Department, 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756, Tel: 727-562-4567; Fax: 727-562-4865 Page 2 of 2 Re^!ised 01/12 DQ CORNERSTONE -- ----- ------_—_--.______________:_ Parking Demand Study PARCEL ID: 45-29-15-16362-008-0120 City of Clearwater, Florida SUBMITTAL TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Flexible Development Application 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 (727) 562-4865 Fax LAND D YYNER AND APPLICANT.• MATHURA PROPERTIES # 5, LLC 1901 S. John Young Parkway, Suite 101 Kissimmee, FL 34741 (321) 284-4631 CONSULTANT.• REGIONAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 2442 Grand Central Parkway, Unit 16 Orlando, Florida 32839 (�o�� s � �-s4sa Eoft�G�� (40'7) 340-5713 (mobiie) E-mail: tuan(�a,rcefl.com JULY 2010 TUAN K. HUYNH, P.E, Florida License No. 54435 Certificate of Authorization No. 26762 � � TABLE 4F C4NTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Proposed Development 1.2 Primary tmpact Area Paqe 1 1 1 2.0 Existinq Conditions 5 2.1 Public Parking Facilities 2.2 Parking Analysis fior Friday, July 16, 2p10 5 2.3 Parking Anatysis for Sa#urday, July 17, 2010 5- 6 3.0 Proiect Parkinq Demand and Customer Use Profile 11 4.0 Summarv and Conclusions , 'f 1 , � FIGURES 1 2 3 4 5 TABLES 1 �a APPENDIX LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Project Loca#ion Map Proposed Site Plan Primary Impact Area (within 1,000 feet) Parking Conditions on July 16, 201Q (Graph) Parking Conditions on July 17, 2010 {Graph) Parking Conditions & Data Collection for Friday, July 16, 2014 Parking Condi#ions & Data Collec#ion for Saturday, July '1?, 2010 PAGE 2 3 4 8 �o r� 0 'I Existing Ci#y of Clearwater Beach Parking Facilities Map 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Proposed Development Regional Consulting Engineers, LLC, has been retained to perform a Parking Demand Study for the praposed "Da Scoop Ice Cream Pariour" development in the City of Clearwater, Flarida. The proposed site (tax parcel ID 05-29-15-16362-008-0120} is located at 22 Bay Esplanade west of Mandalay Avenue (Figure 1). The proposed devefopment consists of a one-story cammercial retail building totaling 1,500 sq-ft (grass floor a�ea). The site area is 4,350 sq-ft (5�' x 87' lot). The site is developed mosfily far walk-up costumers from nearby beach areas, surrounding hotels, and visiting tourists. Please see attached site plan (Figure 2). This reporfi documents the methodology and analysis for the parking demand study. The purpose of the study is to determine the potentiaf project impacts to the existing city public parking facifities within the primary impact area. The parking demand study is required to suppart the project Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project appiication for DRC staff and Cammunity Development Board (CDB} review. 1.2 Primary lmpact Area and Methodology Per the City of Clsarwater LDC and Flexibie Development Application, the proposed project will require a parking demand study within the primary impact area. The impact area is determined to be one-thousand (1,000) feet radius of the site. All public parking spaces (with meters} wilf be counted and tabulated within the impact area. For this study, the peak demand hours are on Friday between 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM and Saturday between 10:00 AM to 1 Q:00 PM. The parking demand analysis will be dane at every one hour increment during the peak hour period. "Google Earth" program was used to determine the approximate 1,000 feet radius primary impact area. The project impact area is bounded by fdlewild Street {to the north), Bay Esplande running north-south direction (east), Baymount Street (south), and Clearwater Beach limits (west). Please see Figure 3 for the Primary Impact Area map. � :�'�t�ti;.,�a'�r.� jj �..�i'r�3� � . .. V��c> j/' .. .,�. � f �x"9�"t*i�t�{.� �i ��. �. . . . .t��di!:�tffl.?� ,� �� "'� ��; �: � ��.. .�' '�. � � � �:. rat 3u�rtit��l �� '' z�, � � ��; � �: ;� _ BAY E�PLANAt�E � ` �:��r�� ,� �� +�.� � x � � � �� ; 4 � +� ° - ' ...._ . e _ . _. .; ,. - . . � s -� ✓� �i � -� . � �t1T]��.I�t �i � L� 6' y ��. i: �.�"� s�, . . � i��. �� 5. ��' �` . � ,: � �. ... � � .� �. � =,_� ;a ��1+#t��iiFt �l � �. g � t� � ` ��g� � � ;� E , ',. .�..� � � � 'i � P : y� a� � � �� b � �� 6 r �> �� . � .`�, 3�i � � � =�J' f ,>,.,��'. � �+ : ��. .. I�� i C�% 3��Y''� F � � � �'��zji� �t � , a � � �` � �� : '� �, i'' i" �,u� ..J ,�: � � � �� '" ��. � > �' : �;;� . �C��x�at� �i'�u�i a� ..� PARCEL ID� Q5-29-15-1636�-t?08-Oi2U PROJECT NA�iE: DA SCOt}P ICE CREAI� PARLOUR PROJECT SI7E AREA: fl.099 ACRE (4,35fl SQ—FT) PHYSICAL SfTE ADDRESS: 22 6AY ESPI.ANADE> CLEARWATER, FL 33767 PROPCrSE� USAGE: CQMMERCIA� RETAIL SERYfCES — ICE CREAM PARLOUR (1,50fl SQ—FT} ee�ar �tt� �,e�r., u_c 2i42 Amd Cenird Pkx�y lkift 18s�iSx+37�"i� OdaMq Flarida 32839 �� _ � ; ,�� n«,a (+o�) a�z-s4aa � t�_.��,�„� {�o�} a�o-3��a c-�„� �zoaso �n.�oc e-�x �,«�o �++.� � � � , j s �.� .Y � �� i ... :� t � � �. � - � - �, . �, � r• • a.: - � f � 3 #�� % f ��y �t `,�� % , FIGURE 1 � ! 1 � � � rn � 3' CLEARANCE& AROUNtl ENTIRE BUdLDING PERIMEfER FOR FIRE DEPf. ACCE55, NO OBSTRtlCTION ALLOWED WfTHIN FHIS AREA f0'SIDE WILDMG SETBACK (70 FACE OF BUItDiNG} 6'. WIDE CONCRE7E WAL(WAY (P.HEA=90 SF) r a. � �L 55 FROM BU4DINa SEfHACK (fOPAGEOFBUIidING) � . �`��:'-. 7 x B' STORE SIGNAGE AREA '10' FRONT LANDSC/WE- Bi1FfERUNE � FIVE (S) PRO?tJ5E0 CANOPY TREES — SU SIDE BU{LDING SEfB (TO iACE OF BU}LQING) � � � .(G'�y��l.� > 10�' -+� r �� L A�� 5 SIDE iJW DSCAPE BUFFER LWE (4N BOTH SIDES} _1mm ..�. N F. ONESTORY BUILDING I ICE CREAM AARLOUR ° G.F.A. = 1,500 Sf � _ L _ � ..._ BUFFER LINE 5 SIpE LAN�3CAPE BUFFER UNE � (ON 00TH SIDE9) � y7' — PR6PERN LENGTN SITE 100-YEAR BASE Fi.00D ELEVATION = �2.0 NGHU� PER FIRM MAP #12t0.3C0t02G (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003) /� PERIMET£RLANDSCAPE ./ 9UFFERUNE /, / i— oRV REfENnpN ppND zoP nr�,= eso sF OEPTH m 78' MINIMUM BItILOING SETBACKUNE 21.6 REAR BUILOING: SETBACK (TO FACE OF BUILDING� : � � �� g a SITE PLAN NOTES: . . LALL OINENSIGNS SNOWN AAE NEA4UpQp TO T+IE PACE OF WRB, UNLESS 07HEfflVLSE notm. 2 Bl131D9J6 MAN9 UYOUT bHOriN ON iYIECkVILS(TE PLANS pREF00. �FfAEMCE PURPOSESONLV. CONSTRtlCT�q1UY0U'1'FOR4FIEPROPOSE�WR[IR{GFWNpAT30N SILVIBE PER TH@ARCHRECTURAL BULOR/G PUNS E1NCf OP�F11610N3. i ALL ClIRB NADN SfNLL BE ] FEE7ANO NEASURE TOFhCEOF GUR9lFNtE59 OIHERW I� NOTEO ON THE RAN9. �. NlYDI6CREPMIClf88�WfEN ilEiD ME/SUREMENiBAlq TIIESE ODNSTRIICiIOH %.ANS SWLLL BE BROIIOHTTO T5ff �TTEMWkOFl1@ EN6BYEER IM1fAE�lAiF3Y. S FINWH CONCRETE WeW(WAYANOTOP� CURB ElEVATbN SNN.L 9E TABOVE FlNLSN PA4EA�HTGq�pE$, B.ALI VFRTIGf.ANp rypWZONTM. C91Y�ROLS 9HON'N AAE IN REf£REH�TO SlllNEY PfiOPERTYCORH�RB AN� BENCMMARIiS AND BNAiL BE YERIFlEO BY THE CONIR�CT�F PR IOA TO C4NSTRUGTION. 1. PPIOR iD I68t1ANCE OF BUIt01N0 YERMR, SUILDINO PLWB NVST OEMOlISTRAiE P0.pOSE0 SEA'NRREFRIEt10LV k3d�11NfiIN ACODRUIINCE 1MTN CfTY C40E ((Y]C SECTION J�170i)AND SfATE UW (fAG. �b5). !b LIGHT WRMM 9W fEEf u1Wl � YISIBtE OREXlENO W AREAS IOENiIFiED AS SEATUAiLE NFSTING AREhR W RING Ti NESTfNO 9EA80N OP MAY t TO OCfOBFA 31. AHEA.4 WHERE SECURRYAND PItflLIC CAFE'fY IiEp11RE 4GHTING� ALTERNATIVE t1GM MANwGE1.ENiMRiDA(.11E3 5/41.1.8EMPlIFD. W GnWitg G�9w�n. LLC Gaq Cnl.d P[.�. �II e{ Q . n us» � � � fw�1 e�z-seeo � x �.�masa siw� i�-� ___ 1111 1111 R r�1 �11�� SITE DATA: 1.SfTEMEA 1,�.5p3f {0.10AC.) 2.AAHCfl.1D: pS19-iS18J820Q&012Q (PINELLASCO. PFOPERNAPPRAI3ERj 9. SiTIE AtlDRESS 228AY EBPIN+ADE. CtFMwAiER FL ]3]e7 4. IEWI QESCfi1PTOH: lOT 12, BI.00X B. PUT 80CK 11, 8 PAOE 5 OF PMELLAu CAUNTY e. w�n owNEa: nwTruan wroaennes xs, uc LEXISTING 20NING: TpUp15TDISTRICT(T� IPERCITYOFCLEARWATIItZONING) 7.PROP0.SED2Q41N0: TOUPoSTOISmIGT(f� O.LMlDUSE AESORTPAC�iIT1E3NIGM �RFN) e, PqqPpSED uSE: iCE CRFAM PPALIXIft 10. GROSS fLOOR APfAI�Aj: 1,5W SF i1.FlADRAREARATIO(FM� 0.315 (IMYJMUMFNiALLOWAq�1,p} 12 PROPp3�0 BUILOING MEIGHT: 15 FEET <w�t. ALiOWPBLE JS FT.� 1J.MM.REOVIHEpBVMM65ET6ACKS PERIXDFLOPopADISTRIGT'BFACHHYDE9IGM FROdlT(SOIIfM} IS 510E(WE:Fj: t0' s�oEt�srl: �o� RE+l0.INOATNk 10' ti.PRpPpSEp&111,W�.N65ET8ACFG9: SEiBRCK�OfACEOF8U3LOtNG FRONT(SOVi41$ 1S (BAYE6PLANMEPUBUCPfN) SIOE(WESTx 1P (IXISTINGMDTEL) si�s�,rsr} :rr tEwsnnc�sscassrarid�� REM(NORMr 2f.T (FJ4CTNCMOTELPOOL) 16.PfiOP0.REDIMPQiVipU$ARFS: 1,SBQSF (3fi9%OFSIT�(NNCI�L(AWABtE95%) BSIItO1N(:: 1.500 SF CONCRt tE WIWCWAV: 9P SF t.SBOSf te.PROPOSEDOPENSPACEARFA 21603F (WA%OFS?E) 57.PRUPOSEOORYRETF.NTIONAHEA; BEOSF (A26%OFSRE) 1B. BASE FLOOp EL£VAiION: 12 Ff.kT M+��1 {FER FIPN IMP 1210JC01MG OATED 09 U1 W) 19. PROPOSEO BUIIDING WILlBE FIOOD AROOF fflOM fINISH ROOR TD ELEVA�ION � 12U 2p. NU3ABEF Oi FMPIOYEE$ �MA%.9HIFT): 3 EMFLtlYEES NOfE EMPlO�'EES W&1 USE Pi10LIC PMKIN�i ARFAnpJAt;ENr TO SRE (50' TO THE SWI OR PUBUCiRAN5A0R7A716N MElHODS �'�'� DA SCOOP 10E GREAM PARLOUR �� '"'� FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS SI'CE PLAN ,�`�.� ... �i�n,,,� CRY OF CLEAHWA7ER FLOFI�A n�,sw .• ' aj ,. i, -.- . , • . . l+�. • • RR(}JECT NAME: DA SCO�P ICE CREAt� PARLOUR ' PROJECT SITE AREA: O.fl99 ACRE (4,35t1 SQ—Fi} PHYSICAL SETE ADD�ESS. 22 BAY ESPLAMADE, CLEARWATER, fL 33767 PROPQSED �1SAGE: COMh1ERCIA� RETAi� SERVICES — ICE CREAM PARLOUR (1,5C�Q SQ—FT} R�«� c«,�,K:�� ,. uc 2+�+z �a,a ca�,tr� t�.y, un�t �a„�c,��`�,� 4Mm+1a, Fla4da 32&39 �yC! .-...........� ... ��,.. �i � .,.,.,.:. � c�, � I �nm�: (�wz} wt2—�t `� � � �•��na.,a: (w�j �o-s�aa E—ma� rce2aJ;�0 a#tnot E—�: tuon4 rcaAscm � ..r �.� .! x� � �. �{ � .:� • � .• i . � k r�,. � .. � � � • � a � � ��♦ ! �� i� :i`: ,�. �.i'::� • � __ _ � I � F�GURE � ............I 2.Q EXISTING CONDITEONS 2.1 Public Parking Facilities There are four (4) public parking facilities and ninety-four (94) on-street parking spaces (with meters) within the 1,000 feet radius primary impact area. Pubtic Parking Facility No. 36 is located just southwest of the project site near the beach entrance and has 145 spaces (handicap spaces are not counted). Public Parking Facifity No. 37 is located northwest of the site and has 53 spaces. Public Parking Facility No. 38 is located east of the site near the City recreational and tennis facility and has i9 spaces. Public Parking Facility No. 39 is located northeast af fihe site near the city public park and has 17 spaces. The number of on-s#reet public parking is 9�4 spaces. The total availability public parking spaces with the project primary impact area is 388 spaces. Please see Appendix A showing the existing Clearwater Beach Parking Facifities. 2.2 Parking Analysis for Friday, July 16, 2010 This day represent a typical peak summer time vacation periad with school out and plenty o# students, locals, and tourists visiting the beach areas on tl�e weekend. The weather was cleared sky and sunny with temperatures around 95 degrees at 6:00 PM and dropping to $5 degrees at 10:00 PM. Public parking spaces occupied were counted starting at 6:00 PM and every hour thereafter until 10:00 PM. According to the results on Table 1, the peak use occurred at 8:OQ PM with almost 79.6% (309 spaces) of the available 388 public parking spaces being occupied. The percentage of occupied parking spaces ranges from 44.6% (173 spaces) to 79.6%. Please see Table 1 and corresponding Figure 4 graphical representation. 2.3 Parking Analysis for Saturday, Ju[y 17, 2U10 The weather was cleared sky and sunny for most of the day with temperatures starting at 88 degrees at 10:00 AM to near 100 degrees in the afternoon and dropping to 85 degrees at 10:00 PM. This Saturday represent a typica! busy weekend with many visiting and overnight stayed tourists, local residents, and students enjoying the nearby beaches, 5 � restaurants, and tourist areas. Public parking spaces occupied were counted starting at 10:00 AM and every hour thereafter until 10:�Q PM. According to Table 2, the parking � faci(ities started aut with a 35.1 %(136 spaces) accupied at 10:00 AM and quickly increased to 89.2% (346 spaces) by noon and peak at 97.7% (379 spaces) at 2:00 PM. The spaces occupied remained in the mid-nineties between the hours of 1:00 PM and 4:00 PM and then dropped to 87.1 %(338 spaces) occupied at 6:00 PM. It then went up again at 8:00 PM with 95.9% (338 spaces) occupied due to the evening crowds visiting the nearby restaurants and eating establishments after sunset. At 10:00 PM the occupied spaces went down ta 60.3% (234 spaces} and the study was ended. Please see Table 2 and corresponding Figure 5 graphical representa�ion. G PROJECT NAME: DA SCOOP 10E CREAM PARLOUR •. SUBJECT: PARKING DEMAND STUDY �ATE OF DATA: FRIDAY, JULY 16, 2010 WEATi1ER: SUIVNY & CIEAR, 85 TO 95 DEGREES TABLE 1 TIME PARKlNG LqT 3fi PARKtNG LOT 3T PARKING LOT 38 PARKING LOT 39 ON-STREET PtJBLICSPACES PARKING DEMAND STWDY RESULTS (HRS} NUMBER SPACES NUMBER SPACES NUMBER SPACES NUMBER SPACES NUMBER SPACES TOTAL 70TAL TOTAL TO7AL SPACES OCCUPIED SPACES 4CCUPIED SPACES OCCUPIED SPACES OGCUPIED SPACES OCCUPIED NUMSER SPACE5 SPACES PERCENT SPACES OCCUPIED AVAILABLE OCCUPIED 6:00 PM • 145 114 53 18 79 13 17 i 94 27 388 173 215 44.6 7:00 PM 145 145 53 24 79 24 17 2 94 43 388 238 156 61.3 8:OQ PM 145 145 53 45 73 54 17 d 94 65 388 309 79 79.6 9:00 P M 145 125 53 27 79 43 77 0 94 54 388 249 139 64.2 10:00 PM 145 102 53 11 79 24 17 0 94 49 3$8 186 2d2 47.9 s5o 30Q 0 w a 250 � v v � 200 w U Q N 150 t7 Z � 1Q0 Q a 50 U FIGURE 4 PARKING AI�ALYSIS - FRIDAY, JULY 16, 2010 NUMBER O� PUBLIC PARKlNG SPAGES (WiTHlN 1,000 FEET) = 388 SPACES 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:04 PM 1fl:04 PM TIME OF DAY (HOURS) � Series1 ■ Series2 Cl Series3 p Series4 ■ Series5 � Series6 ■ Series7 O Series8 ■ Series9 � PROJECT NAME: SUBJECT: DATE OF DATA: WEATHE#2: TIME (MRS) 10:d0 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PNt 3:00 PM 4:d0 PN1 S:OQ PM 6:00 PM �:oa PM 8:00 PM 9:Qa PM 10:00 PM DA SCO�P iCE CREAM PARLOUR PARKING DEMAND STUDY FR[DAY, JULY 16, 2014 5UNNY & CLEAR, 85 TO 95 DEGREES TABLE 2 w� �o rw�cn�no �v r or YAKKING LQi 38 PARKING L0T 39 ON-STREET PUBLIC SPACES PARKING DEliIIAND STUDY RESULTS NUMBER SPACES NUMBER SPACES NUMBER SPAC�S NUMBER SPACES NUMBER SPAC�S TOTAL TOTAL 70TAL TOTAL SPACES OCCUPIED SPACES OCCUP#ED SPACES OCCUPIED SPACES OGCUPIED SPACES OCCUPIED NUMBER SPACES SPACES PERCENT SPACES OCCUPIED AVAILABLE O£CUPIED 145 118 53 4 79 3 17 0 94 11 388 136 252 35.1 145 145 53 27 79 31 17 2 94 33 388 238 150 6'1.3 145 145 53 53 79 70 17 5 94 73 388 346 42 8g2 145 142 53 53 79 7$ 17 17 94 85 38$ 375 13 96.6 '145 145 53 52 79 78 17 16 94 88 388 379 9 g7,7 145 144 53 52 79 79 17 14 94 86 388 375 13 96.6 145 145 53 51 79 75 17 15 94 86 388 372 16 95.9 145 140 53 47 7g 78 17 8 94 72 388 345 43 88,9 145 144 53 43 79 78 17 3 94 70 388 338 5Q 87.1 945 143 53 41 79 79 17 1 94 75 388 339 49 87.4 145 145 53 52 79 78 17 17 94 80 388 372 16 95.9 14b 138 53 24 79 60 17 13 94 8Q 388 315 73 81.2 145 329 53 8 79 33 17 1 94 63 388 234 154 60.3 �oo 350 0 300 w n. � v 250 O � U 200 a a � Z 150 Y !Y Q � 100 50 �j, FIGURE 5 PARKING ANALYSIS - SATUR�AY, JULY 17, 2010 NUMBER OF PUBLIC PARKING SPACES (WlTHIN 1,000 FEET) = 388 SPACES Jp Seriesl 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 5:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY (HOURS) � � 3.0 Project Parking Demand and Customer Use Profile The proposed 1,5Q0 sq-fit ice cream parlour is designed with no on-site parking facility since most of the customers will be waEk-ups from the nearby beach areas and hotels. Based on City cod� for retail services and restaurant, the required number af parking spaces is 15 spaces per 1,000 sq-ft of gross ffoor area under AC. Therefare, the proposed building area will need 23 parking spaces per City code (1,500 sq-ft/1,OQ0 sq-ft x 15 spaces). However, most of the customers and tourists staying at the nearby hotels and resorts have their own parking on-site and will not be driving to the ice cream shop. This project is not a driving destinatian shop serving mostly by pedestrian walk-by or walk-up cusfiomers. The walk-up rate is estimated to be around 60% to 70% for a typica! ice cream shop near the beach at this location. We will use an average of 65% walk-up rate to determine the required parking spaces needed for this development. Therefore the remaining 35% will be calculated for the off-site parking demand. This demand equates fio 8 parking spaces needed for the proposed ice cream parlour site (0.35 x 23 spaces � 8.0 spaces). 4.0 Summary and Conclusion T�e parking demand study report and analysis perfarmed an Friday, July 16, 2010 and Saturday, July 17, 2010 showed that adequate off-site public parking is availabfe to support this develapment. Furthermore, the study was performed during a sunny anci cleared weekend with Ints of local residents and tourists visiting the beach areas. Furthermore, the data callection dates above represent the peak summer vacation period when schools are ciosed and many tourists are visiting the area. It can be assumed that the data collected represent one of the peak demand period annually. PerTable 1 and Table 2, the required eight (8) parking spaces needed forthis development are available at every peak hour increments on both Friday and Saturday. We can reasonable assume that this small development will not cause adverse impacts to the surrounding area public parking faci(ities within the 1,000 feet radius primary impact area. � Appendix 'I Existing Clearwater Beach Parking Facilities Map �z , � t` _ �"""� IDlE9NL0 � � �3°��-�_ : � s � °! 7 �}�� c�exnA� � s �Y q NORTH �E�,�`` *,,Y � Not to Sca1e /�"� � � �w.� ,�v t � < ',�, s� ��z�� s� N M 7 �6 kwiii . .. 5T � � � � . �' r �. �MAY r BAY � 336�%'w �»�8} 't4� S a�r�s RocKSw�Y'� �� acc:s 9� 4 � ".y '`�S a : °MT �'+ , �i � � ' 35 �+� � , � �+ �5 �p��s A[' O ,� �� Par+�x� �r �' ""� �''" ��6'�� .�. , i� Spa�es �+�, _Y _ �.��``'�� `� __.___.. H�r�a�3y Ratts � �c� ____�e. �� t-��n E3�ur:, �€ ��er r��. ��«� t%°�r�-Fr� � Er��fiorc�na�rfi� �i�ur:, � _ n.� ��a�t�ra�� P��,��#.�t3A � 3� . 6±� �Yib3� 4 f3.1.�,� `' a.E�f� I't;'� [%�'IT"?ES �°at7 ,�.�� ca�s��e�6�y �a�t�?. � C)R�C'd �F�r�e 8<n�-6�,�r, �i'` ��r �� 3 ti2.�Q� 7asz�-1aer2 � Ciqsea� "� fi� �. Caslf lses�a �3�va�. 32�` 3.�� . ��(�yde�v L3�ei. �2 ��} � $z.�t{k ; �nz-��t � �Icrs�d S3 �1;� �i�srrac��a� E�� ; I €�€#�� 1.2� � CGo�ra-31�'�tre �ta�;�d _ �� at� 75/ �,:L.�JOJ __ ��6 3•� 4�3 ��an��€�� .e�c�. • £3-�� 7Kr� � _ _ =�o£#� �s,;?S � �t��rcte) ;5 �5� A1�Essl�a��y� +��ae. �i,(�ts �1.2� €3arn-f,p�� ro�rg� �6 4 €:e��i��ay5�. $1.0C� �1.�5�� 6aan•3�rsr �les�d �7 �i��,lon - fC�rsc3�li r��.�[9 A �f.25 ua:��-16�am �° G Ltv�[e�r5 St. f;i�ar�� Farni€y :�r�u��Ee Cer:ter �ars�-��Sm a8 � Recr�P�t�csr� c�r�i�r ��.Ct(� ��.zN ��'9+�n-�a�} S�n �1 �ay° Es�a��o��c�e 32:`�t�p,xt-��r�� h�r�e �5��r) �� t��K�} Fo�tt§ �� P�tr 6i}5 F'�anci�clay 6av�. 53.�4� i $1..�5 £��rst-��g�sa� C#aata� 4a ��e�raay P��a ?S{�J1, E�r�t 5hare Ctr, �1.(iCi �1.;>_� ��rga-�ractt Charge 6��°� �3f�0 �, 5f�cr�e ac. �1.A4 �1.25 �� S�stt-�r�r�s ��ta CE��ar�€� t?ri 5treee €��rk�r�g _ (234 spac��} ��.U� ��.�' tf�ries _..� ��s•'s�s � '` 33 ��aces C� ', � � * C3aiFy tt�ex r�te - ;iti.Qo7{'."s12.5fi datcept- Visa(F�astez Gard/Arn�rtcan �x�aress �' a ' � °�---i,43} *^" �e�scan�i �ate - �4�ec§� €6ea•�c�gh �€�r@S �v�ryda3r a �j --� " Per�xaiE Fai�krng C}rriyr ��r �'1 ��a��s �7ots: �ocs nQt innclutie F9ar�diea� S��e�s � �?' ' � .,-_ / . t?ates � »t af Sp�e�� Sarisjecc to C€zas�c�e —.. ��_"""^ �,_ LfGEND: � � City Park � "� 3� ��ce� ° � � Public Beach �� ,�,� City Farking �oi �� o Rrivate Park�ng I.ot �j �— ��i��.o� Private Parking Garage �� . �-{3(3� �'o�'c �° Qn Street Parkeng � p� ��v.�3 , ��,},��x,�,�� '��,� � Ove►sizeVehicfePkg. � tVl�1iR#td,i� AGTi1iIi1ES "� (23'-50' anly} 2� �pa�es � �}�� ' � �i�iLY �{$ttr[� _ �E�� T�fJ�w�� Ii�� ''��; � �� t�l�;t�.'Oi �� i� �''. i P�o. Loc�at"son Fi�Ce Iraforrnati�sr� �� sT '�,� A 3fE1 S. Gulfview L6vz1. �$U�J) 33.73-7�75 •�+ �r �_. ' g 1€ed} ctzra�nac%a dr. <s23j iaC�-<€9Ei1 ,r� � � � � �� t�4 4�� y � General Parking Information �, �� 727 562-47'Q4 �� _ S� '� °��°� Par�king System Hotlin� � z �'.� � �� ,�� (,727} 562-4$92 � � ---�_ ,, T � � � � I��AC�-� 1��A� � �, � � �� . �« � `m�.�.. �,, � ' � � � �, ;� � � � � 5��, °�� ter �. �a,. �� r .� w � �� Jb (�Z}s—• Ti� �co�t€€�« ��t� t�t� � s�€�t'= k�� (�C�C�Q E'E,�IF L��CJ � U �" �� iI � i3� ra �. mEF�� tr� �trra �f:€t- �� C�iP trs��s p3 �r€, �. �� a e�� EN.�..INEEitlPJG CSEPARTk1£�+IT � � A _ �5 � ., _ ��A`Ett'x.tr � �`1.a�jE:�tbt�l�,�rv€�s?[r � �cr�w:�rty��"lea�r�rate�: c�rn