06/15/2004
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
June 15, 2004
Present: Ed Hooper
John Doran
David Gildersleeve
Shirley Moran
Alex Plisko
Kathy Milam
Vacant Chair
Chair
Vice Chair
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Absent: Daniel Dennehy
Alternate Board Member
Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides
Cyndi Tarapani
Lisa Fierce
Frank Gerlock
Brenda Moses
Assistant City Attorney
Planning Director
Assistant Planning Director
Development Review Manager
Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:01 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation
and Pledge of Allegiance.
.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: May 18, 2004
Member Doran moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of May 18, 2004,
. as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
D. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff,
neighboring property owner, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the
meeting. (Items 1 - 5)
1. Case: FLD2004-02008 - 926 South Myrtle Avenue Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Patrick J. Shaughnessy and Sheryl M. Haynes.
Representative: Roger A. Larson (phone: 727-461-1818; fax: 727-462-0365; email:
roqerl@jpfirm.com).
Location: 1.36 acres located at the northeast corner of Myrtle Avenue and Magnolia
Street, approximately 200 feet south of Druid Road.
Atlas Page: 295B.
Zoning District: Commercial (C).
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a proposed medical clinic in addition
to an existing 33 bed assisted living facility, as a mixed-use, Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C.
Proposed Use: Mixed use (assisted living facility and medical clinic).
Neighborhood Association: None.
.
Community Development 2004-06-15
1
J
.
Presenter: Bryan S. Berry, Planner II.
Member Moran recused herself.
The 1.36-acre site, at the northeast corner of Myrtle Avenue and Magnolia Street, is
approximately 200 feet south of Druid Road. The parcel contains a 10,454 square-foot, one-
story structure, serving as an assisted living facility with 33 beds. It originally was approved for
64 beds. The second building on the property is a 7,800 square-foot, one-story structure. The
buildings are light beige-colored stucco with pitched, grey shingle roofs. The main corners and
columns of the buildings are accented with white square banding. There presently is no other
use on the parcel aside from the assisted living facility. The assisted living facility has been in
occupation since 1996 and is a legal non-conforming use within the Commercial zoning district.
The parcel has three points of access along Myrtle Avenue, Magnolia Street, and on
Jasmine Drive. There are 45 existing parking spaces with two handicap spaces on site. The
two freestanding signs on the parcel represent the maximum number permitted by Code. It is
uncertain if existing freestanding signs meet Code regarding height and area.
The surrounding area is characterized by commercial, institutional, industrial and office
uses. Many medical clinics and facilities are located throughout the area due to the close
proximity to Morton Plant Mease Hospital.
.
The request is to permit a medical clinic to occupy the smaller building, measuring 7,800
square-feet, in addition to the larger, separate 10,454 square-foot existing assisted living facility.
The entire parcel will be converted to a condominium form of ownership, which will allow for
separate ownership of the two existing buildings and shared use of the parking area, driveways,
ingress/egress, signs, and other common area.
Use for the site will be classified as "mixed use" due to the combination of residential
(assisted living facility) and non-residential (medical clinic) uses. Mixed use is a permitted use
in the Commercial zoning district as a Flexible Development application. The minimum off-
street parking spaces required for a "mixed use" project is 4 - 5 parking spaces per 1,000
square-feet of gross floor area. If both buildings, totaling 18,254 square-feet, met that
requirement, the site would need a minimum of 73 spaces and a maximum of 91 spaces. This
is extreme, considering the parking ratio for an assisted living facility requires only one space for
every three beds.
The applicant has requested the application be processed as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project due to the parking requirements. Under the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, the Community Development Coordinator can determine the minimum
amount of off-street parking based on a specific use. Given the nature of the larger building, the
parking requirement will remain the same at 11 parking spaces for the 33 existing beds (one
parking space per three beds). The proposed medical clinic would require 4 - 5 parking spaces
per 1,000 square-feet. At the smaller requirement, the building will require 32 parking spaces.
The total number of parking spaces required for the site is 43. The applicant is proposing 44
parking spaces, including two handicap spaces.
.
The site plan submitted shows existing landscaping that was approved in 1996, with the
original site plan for the 64-bed assisted living facility. A revised landscape plan will need to be
Community Development 2004-06-15
2
.
submitted that meets current requirements set forth in the Code prior to issuance of any building
permit.
The applicant is placing a dumpster enclosure, designed to City standards and
specifications, in the southwest portion of the parcel. This will help screen and serve the
existing assisted living facility and proposed medical clinic. The enclosure should be made of
similar material and painted to match the color of the building.
The applicant has stated that all future signage will comply with the Community
Development Code regulations. Any additional signage to the site for the medical clinic will
require that all signage for the parcel be brought into compliance. Any future signage will be
reviewed by the Planning staff and may require submittal of a Comprehensive Sign Program.
Proposed hours of operation for the medical clinic will be Monday through Friday from
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The clinic will have three physicians, one physician's assistant, and
seven employees, for a total number of 11 employees.
.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on March 04, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development approval to permit a proposed medical clinic, in addition to an existing 33-bed
assisted living facility, as a mixed-use, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-704. C., with the following bases and conditions. Bases for Approval: 1)
The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704 .C.; 2) The proposal complies with other standards in
the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development
is compatible with the surrounding area, AND Conditions of Approval: 1) That any expansion of
the medical clinic facility outside of the 7,800 square-foot structure be reviewed by City staff and
may require Community Development Board approval; 2) That no signage be permitted for the
medical clinic facility unless all signage for the parcel is brought into conformance with Code or
through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 3) That a revised landscape plan be submitted prior to
the issuance of any Building Permit that meets Code; 4) That the dumpster enclosure be
designed with similar materials and colors as the building; and 5) That all traffic impact fees are
to be paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
Member Gildersleeve moved to approve Item D1, Case #FLD2004-02008 for 926 South
Myrtle Avenue with Bases for Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed. The motion was
duly seconded. Members Doran, Gildersleeve, Plisko, Milam, and Chair Hooper voted "Aye";
Member Moran abstained. Motion carried.
2.
Level Two Application
.
Case: FLD2003-12069/TDR2003-12005 - 190 Brightwater Drive
Owner/Applicant: Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland
Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036;
email: nestech@mindsprinq.com).
Location: 0.31 acre located on the north side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 1400
feet east of Hamden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning District: Tourist (T).
Community Development 2004-06-15
3
.
Request: Flexible Development to permit attached dwellings with reductions to the front
(south) setback from 15 to 14.5 feet (to building) and from 15 to 4.2 feet (to pavement),
reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 to 7.5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 to
three feet (to pool deck and sidewalk), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 to
8.3 feet (to building) and from 10 to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the rear
(north) setback from 20 to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk) and to increase the
building height from 35 to 45.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 feet (from roof
deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional 14.25 feet (from roof deck for a roof top
pavilion), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions
of Section 2-803.C (retaining six existing boat slips and one existing dock for sole use by
the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from
620 Bayway Boulevard, under the provisions of Section 4-1403.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 condominium units).
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827
Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email:
dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
The 0.31-acre slightly irregularly-shaped site is on the north side of Brightwater Drive,
approximately 1,400 feet east of Harnden Drive, along a highly developed area within
Clearwater beach, and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the Small
Motel District of Beach By Design, which provides for the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive
with townhomes and timeshares between two and four stories above parking.
.
The site is developed with a two-story residential building of eight units and is
approximately 20 feet in height. The site has the appearance of one, undefined, driveway along
most of the front property line (Brightwater Drive), where parking spaces straddle the property
line (partially on-site and partially within the right-of-way) and "back out" into the right-of-way.
The site also contains a dock and six boat slips, to be retained for resident and guest usage
only and will not be sub-leased. All existing improvements (buildings, pavement, walkways and
decks) will be removed as part of the site's redevelopment.
The property to the east has been redeveloped into townhomes of two living floors
above ground floor garages. The property to the west currently is developed with a two-story
overnight accommodation use, and there have been no redevelopment proposals for that site.
The property to the south, across Brightwater Drive, currently is developed with attached
dwellings and there have been no redevelopment proposals for this site. Property at the
terminus of Brightwater Drive to the east has been approved for a 20-unit, four-story over
ground level parking building. Brightwater Drive, however, can be characterized as undergoing
significant redevelopment into attached dwellings (townhomes and condominiums).
The proposal includes constructing a 10-unit, four-story (over ground level parking)
residential condominium building. A total of nine dwelling units are permitted for the subject
property, based on the maximum of 30 units per acre. The applicant is proposing the utilization
of one dwelling unit through the Transfer of Development Rights from 620 Bayway Boulevard
(which is the maximum of 20% of the maximum number of dwelling units allowed by Section 4-
1402 of the Code). The first two levels will contain three units on each floor, while the third and
fourth levels will have two units per floor. Units on the first two levels will be 1,840 square-feet
each, whereas units on the third and fourth levels will be 2,422 square-feet each.
.
Community Development 2004-06-15
4
.
.
.
The proposal includes 14 parking spaces under the building and two open parking
spaces accessed off the driveway (total of 16 parking spaces). Fifteen parking spaces are
required (1.5 spaces per unit). Parking under the building will be gated, with owners provided
remote gate opening devices. Building Code requires an accessible path for handicap
individuals from the building to the public sidewalk on Brightwater Drive. The accessible path
illustrated on the submitted site plan is not in compliance with requirements, as it requires
individuals to go behind a parking space. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan
must be revised to either eliminate the western open parking space or redesign the accessible
path to be in front of the parking space.
The request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to
permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District due to the rear setback reductions being
requested to the pool deck. Due to the slightly irregular shape of the property, the building has
been positioned on the property to meet the east side setback of 10 feet and the rear setback of
20 feet. This positioning, however, requires reductions to other setbacks. The proposal
includes reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 to 14.5 feet (to building). The requested
front setback reduction is only to the southeast corner of the building, where the southwest
corner of the building is situated 19.2 feet from the front property line. The proposal also
includes a front setback reduction from 15 to 4.2 feet (to pavement). Most projects approved
along Brightwater Drive have been for town homes with individual driveways providing parking
that backs into the right-of-way. This proposal is similar to other townhome and condominium
projects on Bayway Boulevard that have included reductions to the front setback from 15 to
three to five feet (to pavement).
The proposal includes reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 to 7.5 feet (to
pavement) and from 10 to three feet (to pool deck and sidewalk), and reductions to the side
(west) setback from 10 to 8.3 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk). The
requested west side setback reduction is only to the southwest corner of the building, where the
northwest corner of the building is situated 17 feet from the west side property line. The east
side setback reduction to pavement is for a backup flair only, as the parking spaces are located
under the building and meet the required 10-foot setback. Side setback reductions are
requested on the east and west sides for sidewalks, providing pedestrian access to the pool and
dock, are at ground level only, and are minimal intrusions in the setback area.
The proposal includes a reduction to the east side setback and rear setback for the pool
and pool deck. This reduction, however, is for a pool deck that is elevated 1.9 feet over the
existing top of the seawall elevation of 2.9 feet. Section 3-201.B.1 0 of the Code classifies in-
ground pools as accessory structures when it is 12 inches or less above grade (in-ground pools
greater than 12 inches above grade are considered principal structures). Staff is unaware of
any other approved development on Brightwater Drive or Bayway Boulevard where the pool
deck is greater than the maximum of 12 inches above grade (or seawall). Such solid structure
is also located within the waterfront visibility triangle requirement. Staff cannot support the
requested increase to 1.9 feet above the seawall. The pool deck should be lowered to a
maximum of 12 inches above the top of the seawall and sidewalk access modified to provide
adequate ramping for pedestrian access.
The 20-foot rear setback proposed to the building still will comply with the Building Code
requirement of an 18-foot setback from the seawall. The rear setback reduction is otherwise to
Community Development 2004-06-15
5
.
the pool and pool deck, which is consistent with other approved projects on Brightwater Drive
and Bayway Boulevard. Adjustments to the Building Code setback (less than 18 feet) also are
reviewed by the Building Official prior to building permit issuance.
The proposal includes increases to building height from 35 to 45.08 feet (to roof deck)
with an additional 4.17 feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional 14.25 feet
(from roof deck for a roof top pavilion). The proposed building of four stories over ground level
parking is consistent with that envisioned by Beach by Design for this street. Code provisions
allow parapet walls to extend a maximum of 30-inches above the roof deck. The applicant is
requesting to increase the parapet to a total of four feet, two inches (4.17) feet from the roof
deck. This 4.17 -foot high parapet is located on the front, east and west sides of the building, will
screen from view rooftop air condensing units, and will be in proportion with the building fa9ade.
The proposal also includes an open pavilion on the front of the building that will be 14.25 feet in
height (from roof deck to peak of the pavilion roof) for architectural embellishment and to
provide visual relief. The roof deck is also a common element for the condominiums. The
waterside and portions of the east and west sides of the roof will be enclosed for safety and
Building Code purposes with a railing, which will not block water views from residents and
guests while on the roof deck. Code provisions allow, and the proposal includes, elevator
towers, stair towers, and mechanical equipment rooms to be a maximum of 16 feet above the
roof deck. The proposed rooftop pavilion will, therefore, be lower than the elevator and trash
towers also proposed on the front side of the building.
.
The Mediterranean-style of architecture will include a soft yellow stucco for the main
building color, accented by the elevator and trash towers in a darker shade (sun beige). The
parapet walls will contain a Florida-blend of barrel tile roofing. Banding and other architectural
features will be painted a champagne tint. The windows, door frames and railings will be white
in color.
The landscape plan utilizes a colorful groundcover (blue pacific juniper, dwarf jasmine
and red and white fountain grass), shrubs (hibiscus, variegated arboricola, red ixora, Indian
hawthorne and sea grape) and trees (washingtonia palm, cabbage palm, queen palm, ligustrum
tree and silver buttonwood tree).
The applicant is not proposing any signs with this development. Any future freestanding
sign should be a monument-style sign of a maximum four feet in height and designed to match
the exterior materials and color of the building. Dumpsters will be placed within a staging area
adjacent to the building and driveway on pickup days. All required Parks and Recreation fees
will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. On-site utility facilities
(electric and communication lines) will be required to be placed underground as part of the site
redevelopment. Provisions for the placement of conduits for the future undergrounding of
existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of-way should be completed prior to the
issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and
the City. A special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or
sold from 620 Bayway Boulevard and being transferred to this site, is required to be recorded
prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. This special warranty deed also must
contain a covenant restricting, in perpetuity, the use of 620 Bayway Boulevard due to the
transfer of development rights.
.
Community Development 2004-06-15
6
.
.
.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on January 29, 2004, and May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the
Flexible Development request to permit ten attached dwellings with reductions to the front
(south) setback from 15 to 14.5 feet (to building) and from 15 to 4.2 feet (to pavement),
reductions to the side (east) from 10 to 7.5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 to three feet (to pool
deck and sidewalk), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 to 8.3 feet (to building) and
from 10 to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the rear (north) from 20 to zero feet (to pool
deck and boardwalk) and to increase the building height from 35 to 45.08 feet (to roof deck) with
an additional 4.17 feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional 14.25 feet (from
roof deck for a roof top pavilion), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining six existing boat slips and one existing dock
for sole use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling
unit from 620 Bayway Boulevard, under the provisions of Section 4-1403, for the site at 190
Brightwater Drive, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal
complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project per Section 2-803.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code
including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development is
compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts AND
Conditions of Approval: 1) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the
conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2) That, prior to the issuance of
any permits, the site plan be revised to either eliminate the western open parking space or
redesign the accessible path to be in front of the parking space; 3) That the pool deck be
lowered to a maximum of 12 inches above the top of the seawall and sidewalk access modified
to provide adequate ramping for pedestrian access prior to the issuance of any permits; 4) That
a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from
620 Bayway Boulevard and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of
any permits for this project. The special warranty deed also shall contain a covenant restricting
in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 620 Bayway Boulevard due to the transfer of
development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (620 Bayway Boulevard) shall
consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 5) That a
Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 6) That
boats moored at the docks, lift and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or
guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the
condominiums; 7) That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four
feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 8) That all
applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks;
9) That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy; 10) That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be
placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the
abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size
and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the
exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the
City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 11) That all Fire Department
requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and 12) That all Parks and Recreation
fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits.
In response to a question, Senior Planner Wayne Wells presented samples of colors
proposed for the elevations.
Community Development 2004-06-15
7
.
.
.
See motion on page 15.
3.
Pulled from Consent Agenda
Level Two Application
Case: FLD2004-01 002/TDR2004-01 006 - 15-17 Somerset Street and 16 Cambria Street
Owner: Husgen Properties, Inc.
Applicant: Aqua Sun Development, LLC.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland
Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036;
email: nestech@mindsprinq.com).
Location: 0.39 acre located approximately 200 feet west of Mandalay Avenue between
Somerset Street and Cambria Street.
Atlas Page: 258A.
Zoning District: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR).
Request: Flexible Development approval: 1) for attached dwellings (13 condominium
units) with reductions to the front setback (north along Somerset Street) from 25 to 10
feet (to building and pavement) and from 25 to zero feet (to trash staging area),
reductions to the front setback (south along Cambria Street) from 25 to 21 feet (to
building) and from 25 to 19 feet (to balconies), reductions to the front setback (west
along Beach Drive - unimproved) from 25 to 19 feet (to building), from 25 to 17 feet (to
balconies) and from 25 to zero feet (to pool deck), a reduction to the side setback (west)
from 10 to eight feet (to balconies), an increase to the building height from 30 to 61.66
feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet (from roof deck) for perimeter parapets and
an additional eight feet (from roof deck) for decorative roof-top trellises, an increase to
the height of a decorative fence within the front setback along Somerset Street (north)
and Beach Drive (west - unimproved) from three to six feet and to permit a building
within the required sight visibility triangles, as a Residentiallnfill Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-404.F; 2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along
Somerset Street (north) from 10 to zero feet (to dumpster staging area) and along Beach
Drive (west - unimproved) from 10 to zero feet (to pool deck) as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, and 3) Transfer of
Development Rights for two dwelling units from 674 Bayway Boulevard, under the
provisions of Section 4-1403.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (13 condominium units).
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827
Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email:
dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
Member Doran reported Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides had advised him
that he can participate in this case although he has had prior contact with property owner Ms.
Husgen through his real estate and legal profession.
The 0.39-acre site is approximately 200 feet west of Mandalay Avenue, between
Somerset and Cambria streets. The site basically is "L" shaped, with approximately 162 feet of
frontage on Somerset Street (north), 50 feet of frontage on Cambria Street (south), and 60 feet
of frontage on the undeveloped Beach Drive (west). The site is developed with a one- and two-
story, overnight accommodation use of a total of 16 units. All existing improvements are
Community Development 2004-06-15
8
.
.
.
planned to be demolished. While there is some on-site parking, a large amount of existing
parking straddles the front property line along Somerset and Cambria Streets (partially on-site
and partially within the right-of-way). Existing one-story, residential buildings to the east are
between zero and three feet from the property line. The surrounding area currently is
developed with older attached dwellings (condominiums) and detached dwellings. The Colony
Surf Condominiums is adjacent to this project, fronting on Cambria Street (south) and
undeveloped Beach Drive (west). This developer currently is constructing similar attached
dwellings at 14 Somerset Street to the north (15 units - condominium; five living floors above
ground-level parking; height of 56 feet to the roof deck from the FEMA (Federal Emergency
Management Authority) line).
The proposal includes constructing 13 units (condominiums) in a building with five living
floors over two levels of parking. The height of the residential building is proposed at 61.66 feet
from the FEMA line to the roof deck, which is a minimal increase over that being constructed at
14 Somerset Street. This additional height can be attributed to the shape of the parcel and the
need to provide required setbacks and parking. The adjacent Colony Surf Condominium
building is approximately 35 feet in height (from FEMA line to roof deck). Two blocks to the
south, on the north side of Glendale Street and also adjacent to undeveloped Beach Drive, is a
residential condominium building of five living floors over ground level parking. This site is
within the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design, where "low to mid-rise" building heights are
called for. The proposed height of this building is consistent with building heights called for in
the "Old Florida District," is 5.66 feet higher than that approved for 14 Somerset Street, and is
less than that approved for the "LaRisa" project at 650 Bay Esplanade. Staff is using the
"LaRisa" project as a benchmark for this area, where that project's highest roof deck was
approved at 69.5 feet above the FEMA line (although only accounting for 57% of the total roof-
other roof decks were at 58.5, 48, and 37.5 feet above the FEMA line).
The proposal includes a request to increase the height of perimeter parapets around the
edge of the roof deck an additional four feet (from roof deck), where the Code permitted
maximum is 30 inches. This increase is to make the parapets proportional in respect to the
height of the building and that of the similar project to the north, and to aid in the screening of
the rooftop air conditioning units. Additionally, the proposal includes a request to increase the
building height another eight feet (from roof deck) for two, open-air, decorative rooftop trellises
on the north side of the building.
Today, the site has some on-site parking spaces, but a large amount of parking
straddles the front property line along Somerset and Cambria Streets (partially on-site and
partially within the right-of-way). The proposal will eliminate all parking within the right-of-way
and provide two parking spaces per unit (26 total spaces) on-site (Code requirement is 1.5
spaces per unit or 20 spaces). Parking will be provided on two levels and will be screened by
trellis-type screening on both levels of parking. A gated driveway at the western terminus of
Somerset Street will access the first level of parking of 14 spaces. The submitted site plan
proposes to extend the existing street pavement to the west to the existing vehicular barricades.
This area is presently sand. To minimize the extent of additional roadway pavement and to
prevent motorists from using this additional pavement as on-street parking, the site plan should
be amended prior to the issuance of any permits for construction to only pave the length of the
driveway flair. Bollards or other barriers acceptable to the City should be installed at the new
end of pavement. A gated driveway on Cambria Street will access the second level of parking
of 12 spaces. Sidewalks will be constructed within the Somerset and Cambria streets rights-of-
Community Development 2004-06-15
9
.
.
.
way for pedestrian safety. No sidewalks presently exist. To meet Fire and Building Code
requirements for accessible paths from the stairwell to a public space, two sidewalks are
proposed from the building to Cambria Street, one outside the building and one inside the
building. These sidewalks can be combined, preferably to the sidewalk inside the building, to
minimize the amount of pavement and to increase the amount of landscaped area. This change
should be made prior to the approval of any permits for construction, acceptable to the Fire and
Building Departments.
The proposed building will have five living floors, with two units each on floors three and
four, and three units each on floors five through seven. Units will range between 2,653 and
2,878 square-feet. Most units will have an easUwest orientation, with the exception of units on
the southern end of the building, which will have a north/south orientation. Units will be
accessed by elevators from a lobby off of Somerset Street or from a lobby in the center of the
building. A central stairwell provides stair access for all units. Floor three provides an exercise
room and a clubroom, both with two-story height.
The request is being processed as a Residentiallnfill Project to permit attached
dwellings within the MHDR District due to the height increase and setback reductions being
requested to the building, pavement, a dumpster staging area, and the pool deck. The proposal
includes reductions to the front setback (north along Somerset Street) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to
building and pavement) and from 25 to zero feet (to trash staging area). This front setback
proposed is similar to that of the approved project to the north, at 14 Somerset Street. Front
setback reductions also are requested along Cambria Street to the south from 25 to 21 feet (to
building) and from 25 to 19 feet (to balconies). Buildings to the east of the subject property
have a front setback of approximately 10 feet from Somerset or Cambria Street. The proposal
includes reductions to the front setback along Beach Drive to the west (unimproved) from 25 to
19 feet (to building), from 25 to 17 feet (to balconies) and from 25 to zero feet (to pool deck).
Multi-floor condominium buildings to the south are set back zero feet from this unimproved right-
of-way.
Concurrent with the front setback reductions in this proposal is the reduction to the front
landscape buffer along Somerset Street and Beach Drive. The dumpster staging area is within
the buffer on Somerset Street, whereas the pool and pool deck are within the buffer along
Beach Drive. The request includes an increase to the height of a decorative fence within the
front setback along Somerset Street (north) and Beach Drive (west - unimproved) from three to
six feet. This will be viewed primarily around the pool area on the west side of the building,
whereas the balance of the decorative fence is at the building lines, screening the parking. With
the front setback proposed, the building's structural columns will be within the visibility triangles
at the Somerset Street driveway. The parking screening will provide views through it for
visibility purposes. Finally, the proposal includes a reduction to the side setback (west) from 10
to eight feet (to balconies). The setback reduction to balconies is due to the proposed balconies
exceeding the restrictions of Section 3-908.0 that such projections not exceed 50% of the width
of the building wall to which they are attached.
The applicant only anticipates attached signage meeting Code provisions. Should
attached signage be desired on both Somerset and Cambria Streets, a Comprehensive Sign
Program will be required. All requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code need to be met
prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Parks and
Recreation fees need to be paid.
Community Development 2004-06-15
10
. This proposal includes the Transfer of Development Rights of two units to this site from
674 Bayway Boulevard (six townhomes constructed where nine units were permitted). Section
4-1402 of the Code only permits the transfer where it does not exceed 20% of the permitted
density for the subject site. The proposal is in compliance with the standards of Section 4-1402
and the criteria of Section 4-1403.
.
.
The redevelopment of this site, with enhanced landscape improvements, will improve the
appearance of this site and the surrounding area. All applicable Code requirements and criteria
including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Residentiallnfill
Project criteria (Section 2-404.F) have been met.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on March 4, 2004, April 1, 2004, and May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends
approval of the Flexible Development request for 1) Attached dwellings (13 condominium units)
with reductions to the front setback (north along Somerset Street) from 25 to 10 feet (to building
and pavement) and from 25 to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front setback
(south along Cambria Street) from 25 to 21 feet (to building) and from 25 to 19 feet (to
balconies), reductions to the front setback (west along Beach Drive - unimproved) from 25 to 19
feet (to building), from 25 to 17 feet (to balconies) and from 25 to zero feet (to pool deck), a
reduction to the side setback (west) from 10 to eight feet (to balconies), an increase to the
building height from 30 to 61.66 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet (from roof deck)
for perimeter parapets and an additional eight feet (from roof deck) for decorative rooftop
trellises, an increase to the height of a decorative fence within the front setback along Somerset
Street (north) and Beach Drive (west - unimproved) from three to six feet and to permit a
building within the required sight visibility triangles, as a Residentiallnfill Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-404.F; 2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset
Street (north) from 10 to zero feet (to dumpster staging area) and along Beach Drive (west -
unimproved) from 10 to zero feet (to pool deck) as a Comprehensive Landscape Program,
under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and 3) the Transfer of Development Rights for two
dwelling units from 674 Bayway Boulevard, under the provisions of Section 4-1403 for the site at
15-17 Somerset Street and 16 Cambria Street, with the following bases and conditions: Bases
for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential
Infill Project per Section 2-404.F; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the
Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development is
compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts AND
Conditions of Approval: 1) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the
conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2) That the site plan be
amended prior to the issuance of any permits to only pave the length of the driveway flair in
Somerset Street and that bollards or other barriers acceptable to the City be installed at the new
end of pavement; 3) That the accessible sidewalks from the stairwell to Cambria Street be
combined (preferably to the sidewalk inside the building) and shown on an amended site plan
prior to the issuance of any permits, acceptable to the Fire and Building Departments; 4) That a
Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 5) That a
special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 674
Bayway Boulevard and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any
permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in
perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 674 Bayway Boulevard due to the transfer of
development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (674 Bayway Boulevard) shall
Community Development 2004-06-15
11
.
.
.
consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 6) That any
future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and designed
to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 7) That all Fire Department
requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permit; 8) That all applicable requirements of
Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 9) That all proposed
utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for
the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed
along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The
applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected
utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of
conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior
to the commencement of work; 10) That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the
issuance of any permits; and 11) That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of
the first Certificate of Occupancy.
Mr. Wells reported conditions incorrectly listed in the staff report now are accurate. In
response to a question, he said Condition #9 only requires the applicant to install conduits along
the street frontage, not between Cambria and Somerset streets. This condition is a requirement
for all beach projects. It was remarked that significant impediments block pedestrian beach
access. In response to a question, Mr. Wells suggested the applicant address public access to
the beach.
Roger Larson, representative, referenced a site illustration depicting trellises, color
schemes, etc. A six-foot fence bordering the pool area and along Somerset will be installed for
security. The applicant requests a zero lot line at the pool area by the seawall. He said the
project will not further obstruct access to the beach, as it exists today. He said the height
increase is requested to accommodate parking under the building. While Code requires 20
parking spaces, the applicant plans two spaces per unit under the building, for a total of 26. The
provision of parking beneath the building will limit street parking. The proposal complies with
staff's request to construct a stacking lane for vehicles. To avoid site line obstruction, the gates
will be transparent.
Mr. Larson explained the property's L-shape configuration and frontage on three streets
is problematic. He said it has been difficult to provide adequate parking while maintaining City
recommended setbacks and meeting all Code requirements. The property cannot be developed
if 25-foot setbacks are required for each frontage. He stated many nearby buildings were
constructed in the 1930s and nearly all area properties feature zero setbacks. None of those
properties has retention areas, except for this project. Mr. Larson said this project meets all
Beach by Design requirements. He reported the applicants accept staff's conditions. In
response to a question, Mr. Larson said the applicant has spent 18 months working on this
project. After multiple meetings with staff, he said the project was redesigned 12 times.
Two persons spoke in opposition to the application.
In response to a question, Development Review Manager Frank Gerlock said utilities for
the project will not be underground right away. Florida Progress and the City will install
underground utilities after the project, which will bury cable conduits, is completed.
Community Development 2004-06-15
12
.
.
.
Mr. Larson said the site now features 16 units used as hotel accommodations and
temporary apartment facilities. He referenced an illustration of the project's landscaping and
retention feature. He said the project will be pedestrian-friendly. He said the applicant is
cognizant of difficulties related to constructing a project within a residential area and will take
steps to minimize disruptions. Mr. Larson said this project will improve the site and benefit the
City, residents, and tax base. In response to a concern regarding the operation of construction
equipment from Cambria Street, Mr. Larson said it is sometimes difficult to maneuver cranes
and other heavy equipment. He felt certain the applicant will do whatever is possible and
reasonable to avoid impeding the flow of residential traffic.
Member Gildersleeve moved to approve Item D3, Case FLD2004-1002/TDR2004-
01006 for 15-17 Somerset Street and 16 Cambria Street, with 8ases for Approval and
Conditions of Approval, as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
4.
Case: FLD2004-03017 / PL T2004-00003 - 504 Jasmine Way Level Two Application
Owner: E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha and Robert Resnik.
Applicant: GWllnvestments, Inc.
Representative: GWllnvestments (2510 W Prospect Rd, Tampa, F133629; phone: 813-
258-5240, fax: 813-258-5241; email: qwiqqy@tampabaY.rr.com
Location: 2.59 acres located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue, generally
south of Cleveland Street.
Atlas Page: 2958.
Zoning Districts: Commercial (C); Office (0).
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front
setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to
paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet
to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three
feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a
building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.8 and Preliminary Plat approval for
45 lots, and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-
1202. G.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (45 units).
Neighborhood Association: Harbor Oaks Association; (Margaret Hightower, 301 Druid
Road West, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-447-8081).
Presenter: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III.
The staff report for this project includes a condition that no building permits be issued
until the release of the existing north to south nine-foot drainage easement. City of Clearwater
Engineering staff has provided an amendment to replace this condition with, "That no building
permits be issued until it is demonstrated that the proposed stormwater drainage system
adequately conveys offsite drainage." This amended condition was written upon a staff review
of the condition as worded in the staff report and after a discussion between the Development
Review Manager and an Assistant City Attorney.
The staff recommendation for this case continues to be for approval of the Flexible
Development application to: 1 ) To permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to
building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the
north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the
Community Development 2004-06-15
13
.
.
.
south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office
property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-
1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-
1202.G; 2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots; and 3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of
Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail, with the following
bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible
Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and
2-1 004.B; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the
General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3) The proposal is in compliance with the
Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3-1202.G; and 4) The development is
compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts AND
Conditions of Approval: 1) That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2)
That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way; 3) That no
building permits be issued until it is demonstrated that the proposed stormwater drainage
system adequately conveys offsite drainage; 4) That all Fire Department requirements be met
prior to the issuance of any permits; 5) That the final design and color of the building be
consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the COB; 6) Revise
mitigation counts for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to
be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a
detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 7) Provide a revised landscape plan
(to address tree heighUcaliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), for consideration
and approval by staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 8) That all signage meet Code and
be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings.
Assistant Planning Director Lisa Fierce reported conditions listed in the staff report were
numbered incorrectly, and some required revisions. The revised conditions are agreeable to the
applicant. In response to a question, Scott Doster, GWllnvestments, Inc., said the structure will
be 18 feet from the curb.
AND
5. Case: FLD2003-11057 - 514 South Gulfview Boulevard Level Two Application
Owner: ACS Resorts Inc.
Applicant: Bob Lyons, Dalton Clearwater LLC.
Representative: Bill Woods, Woods Consulting, Inc (322 Ridge Road, Palm Harbor, FL
34683: phone: 727786-5747; fax:727-786-7479; email:
bi Ilwoods@woodsconsultinq.orq).
Location: 1.54 acres located on the north side of Gulfview Boulevard, south of
Clearwater Harbor, approximately 100 feet south of the intersection of Hamden Drive
and South Gulfview Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning District: Tourist (T).
Request: Flexible Development approval to construct a 19-slip multi-use dock, under the
provisions of Section 3-601.
Proposed Use: A 19-slip multi-use dock as part of an attached dwelling development.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827
Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email:
dmacnav@att.net).
Community Development 2004-06-15
14
.
.
.
Presenter: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III.
The 1.54-acre site is on the north side of South Gulfview Boulevard, south of Clearwater
Harbor, and approximately 100 feet south of the intersection of Hamden Drive and South
Gulfview Boulevard. On October 21,2003, the Community Development Board approved Case
FLD2003-08041/TDR2003-08004 with 16 conditions to develop the upland portion of the site
with 55 residential attached units. On May 21, 2004, pursuant to Section 4-406.A of the
Community Development Code, minor revisions to the site plan were approved pertaining to
roof height and design. Two motels, consisting of 78 motel rooms, had occupied this site. The
motels had use of some docks on the north side of the site. The docks are to be replaced by a
19-slip multi-use dock presented with this Flexible Development submittal.
Section 3-601.C.3 requires docks larger than 500 square-feet in area (in association with
a multi-family development or condominium) to be treated as commercial docks and be
approved as part of a Level Two, Flexible Development review. The proposal includes removal
of existing docks and the construction of 2,136 square-feet of dock as an amenity to the
previously approved, 55-unit residential attached unit development.
The dock has setbacks of 135 feet and 44.4 feet and will occupy 54% of the shoreline.
The slips are designed to accommodate boats of a length of up to 30 feet. All applicable Code
requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-
913) and dock criteria (Section 3-601.C.3) have been met.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development
to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601, for the site at 514 South
Gulfview Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The
proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria under the provisions of Section 3-601;
2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The dock development is compatible with the
surrounding area AND Conditions of Approval: 1) That boats moored at the docks be for the
exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the attached residential units and not be
permitted to be sub-leased separately from the attached residential units; 2) That dock-
supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning boaters of the
existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity; 3) That copies of SWFWMD
(Southwest Florida Water Management District) and/or FDEP (Florida Department of
Environmental Protection) Permit, Corps of Engineer's Permit and Submerged Land Lease be
provided prior to commencement of construction; 4) That a turbidity curtain be provided for
sediment control; and 5) That a sediment and erosion control plan be provided prior to building
permit issuance.
Member Gildersleeve moved to approve Item 02, Case #FLD2003-12069/TDR2003-
12005 for 190 Brightwater Drive with Bases for Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed,
Item 04, Case #FLD2004-03017 /PL T2004-00003 for 504 Jasmine Way, with Bases for
Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed, and Item 05, Case #FLD2003-11 057 for 514
South Gulfview Boulevard with Bases for Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Community Development 2004-06-15
15
.
.
.
E. REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES (Items 1 - 2)
1. Level Two Application
Case: FLD2004-01 004/TDR2004-01 007 - 638-650 Poinsettia Avenue
Owner: DiDomizio Investments, Inc.
Applicant: Roger's Beach Development.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland
Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036;
email: nestech@mindsprinq.com).
Location: 0.701 acre located at the northwest corner of Poinsettia Avenue and Royal
Way.
Atlas Page: 258A.
Zoning District: Tourist (T).
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit an overnight accommodations use of
33 total units with a reduction to lot width from 150 to 102 feet (along Royal Way),
reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 to seven feet (to pavement) and from 15 to
four feet (to dumpster staging area) and to increase the building height from 35 to 74.67
feet (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck),
under the provisions of Section 2-803.1, and the Transfer of Development Rights for five
units from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403.
Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations (33 total units).
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827
Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email:
dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
AND
2. Case: FLD2004-02006 -1315 South Fort Harrison Avenue Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Corbett Development, Inc.
Representative: F. Blake Longacre (phone: 727-446-5846; fax: 727-446-1296; email:
fbldev@tampabav.rr.com).
Location: 0.34 acre located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue,
approximately 300 feet north of Lakeview Road.
Atlas Page: 305B.
Zoning District: Industrial Research Technology (IRT).
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce: the minimum lot size from 20,000
square-feet to 14,850 square-feet, the front (west) setback along South Fort Harrison
Avenue from 20 to 15 feet to pavement, the front (south) setback along "B" Street from
20 to 13 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), the side (north) setback from 15
to five feet (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 15 to zero feet (to pavement), for
an office, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project.
Proposed Use: A 2,044 square-foot office.
Neighborhood Association: None.
Presenter: Bryan S. Berry, Planner II.
Community Development 2004-06-15
16
.
Member Doran moved to continue Item E1, Case FLD2004-01 004/TDR2004-01 007 for
638-650 Poinsettia Avenue, and Item E2, Case FLD2004-02006 for 1315 South Fort Harrison
Avenue to a date uncertain. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
F. CONTINUED ITEMS: (Items 1 - 2)
1. Level Three Application
Case: CPA2004-04001 Amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department.
Request: Amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan revising Policy 2.1.4 of
the Future Land Use Plan Element with regard to the areas eligible for the density pool
of additional hotel rooms established in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for
Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827
Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL: 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email:
dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
In July 2001, the Clearwater City Council adopted Beach by Design: A Preliminary
Design for Clearwater Beach. This special area plan governs approximately 213 acres of
Clearwater beach and sets forth a series of revitalization strategies in the following areas: land
use; mobility; off-street parking; catalytic projects; economic feasibility and financing; and design
guidelines.
.
The catalytic projects section of the Plan supported designating Clearwater Beach a
Community Redevelopment District on the Countywide Future Land Use Map and establishing a
limited pool of 600 additional hotel rooms to be available in key locations on the beach. It was
believed that additional density would be the best incentive to stimulate the development of a
small number of catalytic resort projects. In 2001, the City of Clearwater amended the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan to support the designation of the beach as a Community
Redevelopment District, create the resort pool, and identify the areas where the pool could be
used.
Policy 2.1.4 of the Future Land Use Element identifies three locations in the Clearwater
Beach Community Redevelopment District that are eligible for the density pool of 600 resort
units. The south beach area generally is located south of the Pier 60 parking lot, north of the
Adam's Mark Hotel between Coronado Avenue, and South Gulfview Avenue. The first north
beach area is located between Mandalay Avenue and the Gulf of Mexico between Baymont
Street and Papaya Street. The second north beach area is located on the east side of
Mandalay Avenue north of Baymont Street and is formerly known as the Yacht Basin apartment
site. These areas were selected based on their proximity to the dry sand beach; land assembly
opportunities and redevelopment potential; proximity to Clearwater Harbor; and/or location
relative to the proposed Beach Walk (improved South Gulfview Boulevard).
Use of the resort pool has been approved for a site located in the south beach area. An
application for the use of the pool has been submitted for review for a site located in the
northerly portion of this designated pool area. At this time, the application is still pending. In
2002, building permits were issued for a townhome/condominium development at the
.
Community Development 2004-06-15
17
.
.
.
designated Yacht Basin site. This residential project currently is under construction and will
preclude the development of a resort in this location.
The proposed amendment to Policy 2.1.4 of the CleafWater Comprehensive Plan would
eliminate the pool's availability from the 6.2 acre Yacht Basin site. In its place, the pool would
be extended to 4.6 acres of land located between Mandalay Avenue and the Gulf of Mexico
between Baymont Street and Rockaway Street. This area is adjacent to the area currently
eligible for the pool between Mandalay Avenue and the Gulf of Mexico between Papaya and
Baymont Streets. This site is well suited for the density pool due to its proximity to the dry sand
beach, its location adjacent to an area already available for the pool, assembly opportunities,
and serious developer interest.
Pursuant to Community Development Code Section 4-603(F) no amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan shall be approved unless it complies with the following standards: 1) The
amendment will further implementation of the comprehensive plan consistent with the goals,
policies and objectives contained in the plan. The proposed amendment to the CleafWater
Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the City's long range planning policies related to the
redevelopment of Clearwater beach. The amendment makes minor changes in the locations
eligible for the resort density pool. The proposed amendment will further implementation of the
comprehensive plan consistent with other goals, policies and objectives of the Plan; 2) The
amendment is not inconsistent with other provisions of the comprehensive plan. The proposed
amendment only makes a minor modification to an existing Plan policy by changing one of the
locations designated as eligible for the resort density pool in the Community Redevelopment
District on Clearwater beach. The proposed amendment is not inconsistent with other
provisions of the Plan; 3) The available uses, if applicable, to which the property may be put are
appropriate to the property in questions and compatible with existing and planned uses in the
area. The property proposed to be eligible for the resort pool is part of the Clearwater Beach
Community Redevelopment District and has a land use designation of Resort Facilities High on
the City's Future Land Use Plan Map. This land use category allows a variety of residential and
commercial uses, including overnight accommodations. The proposed amendment provides an
incentive for a resort development, which is a permitted use in this tourist-oriented future land
use plan category; 4) Sufficient public facilities are available to serve the property. When the
density pool of 600 additional resort units was created in 2001, it was determined sufficient
capacity existed in the sewer, water and transportation systems to accommodate the increased
hotel density. The proposed amendment essentially moves the area eligible for the pool from
the east side of Mandalay Avenue to the west side in the same vicinity of north Clearwater
beach. Sufficient public facilities are available to accommodate this proposed amendment; 5)
The amendment will not adversely affect the natural environment. The resort pool has been in
existence on Clearwater Beach, a Community Redevelopment District, since 2001. The pool
did not have any affect on environmental policies in the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed
revision will not impact environmental policies. The area proposed to be eligible for the density
pool is currently developed; therefore inclusion within the pool eligibility area will not result in
any negative impacts on the natural environment. The resort pool is only allowed in selected
locations on Clearwater ~each and d.oes not permit increases in the permanent population in
the coastal high hazard area. Any redevelopment that occurs as a result of the proposed
amendment must comply with the impervious surface ratio, drainage and water quality
standards. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect or alter the natural environment;
and 6) The amendment will not adversely impact the use of property in the immediate area.
The purpose of the proposed amendment is to stimulate the redevelopment of Clearwater
Community Development 2004-06-15
18
.
beach with the construction of new family-oriented resort development. It is anticipated that this
type of development will have a positive impact on the use of property in the immediate area,
which is designated for mixed-use development on both the Future Land Use Plan Map and
Zoning Atlas.
The proposed amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan removes the Yacht
Basin site from the list of sites eligible for the resort density pool due to the construction of a
residential development on this property. The amendment also identifies another site to be
eligible for the pool. The proposed amendment is consistent with other provisions of the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, will further the City's redevelopment goals, will not adversely
impact the use of property in the immediate vicinity, will not adversely affect the natural
environment or property in the immediate area, and sufficient public facilities exist to implement
the proposed amendment. Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the amendment
to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
In response to a question, Long Range Planning Director Gina Clayton said the City is
able to change its Comprehensive Plan twice a year. Some applicant-proposed changes will be
forwarded to DCA (Florida Department of Community Affairs) for review. Zoning changes west
of Mandalay Avenue, between Idlewild and Cambria, may require changes to the
Comprehensive Plan. An area study, planned for the fall, will be presented to the Council prior
to any changes being made. No land uses changes will be made before next year. Staff
typically submits large-scale amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to DCA in March and July
in order to submit the amendments to the Council for approval before year's end.
.
One person spoke in support of the application.
Member Gildersleeve moved to recommend approval of Item F1, Case #CPA2004-
04001, Amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
2. Level Three Application
Case: Amendment to Beach by Design Special Area Plan
Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department.
Request: Amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach
and Design Guidelines revising the areas eligible for the resort density pool, the
timeframe the resort density pool is available and the characteristics which make a
project eligible for the pool.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827
Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email:
dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
In 2001, the Clearwater City Council adopted Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for
Clearwater Beach. This special area plan governs approximately 213 acres of Clearwater
beach and sets forth a series of revitalization strategies in the following areas: land use;
mobility; off-street parking; catalytic projects; economic feasibility and financing; and design
guidelines.
.
Community Development 2004-06-15
19
.
.
.
In order to overcome economic constraints associated with beach redevelopment,
Beach by Design proposed a limited number of catalytic resort projects to reposition and re-
establish Clearwater beach as a quality, family resort community. In order to stimulate this
catalytic redevelopment, the Plan established a limited pool of 600 additional hotel units
available in key locations for a period of five years. It also required projects to have specific
characteristics in order to be eligible for the pool.
The Plan has been in effect for three years. During this time the City has entered into
negotiations for several projects requesting resort units from the density pool. Through this
process it has become clear that minor amendments should be proposed to Beach by Design
regarding the timeframe of the pool, several of the required resort characteristics and the areas
eligible for the pool.
Proposed Ordinance #7294-04 makes five amendments in three areas of Subsection B.
Community Redevelopment District Designation of Section V. Catalytic Projects of Beach by
Design: 1) Provisions Regarding the Establishment and Timeframe bf the Density Pool - Third
Paragraph of Page 44 of Beach By Design. (Page 2 of proposed ordinance). The first proposed
amendment extends the life of the density pool from five years to 10 years to the new expiration
date of June 6, 2011. When Beach By Design was approved in 2001, there was a very strong
economic climate. The City approved one resort that used the density pool in December 2001.
Due to unexpected litigation with the approved case and unexpected changes in resort financing as
a result of terrorism, the approved project has not been constructed. Due to the amount of time it
requires to plan, develop and finance a resort, it is unrealistic to expect the entire pool to be
allocated and resorts constructed within this five-year period. If it did occur, it may be difficult for
the local market to absorb the additional 600 resort units within this time period. It should be noted
that the one approved development agreement that allocates pool units requires construction of the
resort to commence within a certain tillle period. If it dpes not, the development approval is null and
void and the units from the pool revert back to the City. Extending the life of the pool potentially will
reserve the pool in the event approved development does not commence within the required
timeframe; 2) Characteristics of Resort Obtaining Density Pool - Pages 46 of Beach by Design.
(Pages 2 - 3 of proposed ordinance). The Planning Department is proposing amendments to 3 of
the 14 required characteristics for projects using resort pool units. The fifth listed characteristic in
Beach by Design requires a resort to have a trip generation management program that provides
transportation to and from the airport and to off-site amenities and attractions. It also specifies that
the cost of the airport shuttle service be included in the basic room rate of the resort. Proposed
Ordinance #7294-04 deletes the provision requiring the shuttle cost to be included in the room rate.
This amendment does not eliminate the requirement, but allows the resort operator to determine
how best to pay for the service. The goal of this characteristic is to ensure that a resort provide
transportation to help mitigation traffic impacts associated with the increased density allowed by the
pool. It also is the kind of amenity characteristic of a quality resort. Proposed Ordinance #7294-04
proposes to revise the seventh listed characteristic that specifies that 25% of the resort units may
have kitchens. Because it is customary for resorts to provide a variety of kitchen types, the
Planning Department is proposing to clarify this provision. The proposed amendment will limit 25%
of the rooms to full kitchen while allowing partial and mini-kitchen in the remainder of rooms. The
goal of this characteristic is to ensure that the units cannot be converted into residential units and
recognize that resorts to have a variety of kitchen facilities that need to be accommodated. The
Planning Department also is proposing to eliminate the fourteenth listed characteristic, which
requires resorts using pool units to be subject to a covenant that obligates the resort to participate
in a Clearwater Beach operation and maintenance assessment program. At this point no such
Community Development 2004-06-15
20
.
.
.
program exists; however, whenever such a program is implemented on Clearwater beach, it will
apply to ill! property within the designated program area. The Planning Department is
recommending this characteristic be deleted from Beach by Design; and 3) Areas Eligible for the
Density Pool- Page 47 of Beach by Design. Beach by Design designates three locations as
eligible for the density pool of 600 resort units. The south beach area is generally located south of
the Pier 60 parking lot and north of the Adam's Mark Hotel between Coronado Avenue and South
Gulfview Avenue. The first north beach area is located between Mandalay Avenue and the Gulf of
Mexico between Baymont Street and Papaya Street. The second north beach area is located on
the east side of Mandalay Avenue, north of Baymont Street, and is formerly known as the Yacht
Basin apartment site. These areas were selected based on their proximity to the dry sand beach;
land assembly opportunities and redevelopment potential; proximity to Clearwater Harbor; and/or
location relative to the proposed Beach Walk (improved South Gulfview Boulevard). The City
Council has allocated units from the resort pool for a project located in the southerly portion of the
south beach pool area. An application requesting density from the pool has been submitted for a
project located in the northerly portion of the south beach area, however, is not approved at this
time. In 2002, building permits were issued for a townhome/condominium development at the
second north beach site. This residential project is currently under construction and precludes the
development of a resort in this location. The proposed amendment to Beach by Design would
eliminate the pool's availability from the 6.2-acre second north beach site. In its place, the pool
would be extended to 4.6 acres of land located between Mandalay Avenue and the Gulf of Mexico
between Baymont Street and Rockaway Street adjacent to the first north beach location. This site
is well suited for the density pool due to its proximity to the dry sand beach, its location adjacent to
an area already available for the pool, assembly opportunities, and serious developer interest.
There is a companion item to this amendment (CPA2004-04001, Agenda Item E5) that amends the
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan regarding the pool location. Approval of the companion item will
render this special area plan amendment consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The purpose of Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach is to guide
redevelopment activities within the Clearwater Beach Community Redevelopment District. One
major strategy included in the Plan is to stimulate the construction of quality family-oriented
destination resorts within targeted areas of the District. The proposed amendments to Beach by
Design do not change the focus of this Plan. While the amendments recognize changed
conditions, they maintain consistency with the City's long range planning policies for Clearwater
Beach as specified in the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and as follows: 1) Objective 2.1 -
The redevelopment of blighted, substandard, inefficient and/or obsolete areas shall be a high
priority and promoted through the implementation of redevelopment and special area plans, the
construction of catalytic private projects, City investment, and continued emphasis on property
maintenance standards; 2) Policy 2.1.1 - Redevelopment shall be encouraged, where
appropriate by providing development incentives such as density bonuses for significant lot
consolidation and/or catalytic projects, as well as the use of transfer of development rights
pursuant to approved special area plans and redevelopment plans; 3) Policy 2.1.2 - Renewal of
the beach tourist district shall be encouraged through the establishment of distinct districts
within Clearwater Beach, the establishment of a limited density pool of additional hotel rooms to
be used in specified geographic areas of Clearwater Beach, enhancement of public rights-of-
way, the vacation of public rights-of-way when appropriate, transportation improvements, inter-
beach and intra-beach transit, transfer of development rights and the use of design guidelines,
pursuant to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design
Guidelines; and 4) Objective 19.6 - Redevelopment areas established in coastal areas should
address the needs and opportunities unique to those locations.
Community Development 2004-06-15
21
.
.
.
The proposed amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater
Beach revise provisions in Subsection B. Community Redevelopment District Designation of
Section V. Catalytic Projects. Due to the complexity of planning, financing and constructing a
resort, the first amendment extends the life of the resort density unit pool from five to 10 years.
The second amendment revises the trip generation management requirement that airport
shuttle service be financed through room rates. Deletion of this requirement enables resorts to
determine how to best provide this service. The third amendment clarifies that resort units with
a full kitchen are limited to 25% of the total. units. It also recognizes that partial and mini-
kitchens are typical amenities found in resorts. The fourth amendment deletes a characteristic
that requires resorts to be subject to participation in an operation and maintenance assessment
program for Clearwater beach. In the event such a program is developed, all affected
properties will be obligated to participate, therefore, this characteristic is not needed and really
does not ensure the development of a quality resort. The last amendment creates an
opportunity for resort development to occur on the Gulf of Mexico in place of the former Yacht
Basin site, which is no longer available for redevelopment.
The Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the amendments herein to
Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach, with the following bases. Bases
for Approval: 1) The proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and
the Community Development Code; 2) Beach by Design, as amended, provides a realistic
timeframe for the use of the resort density pool on Clearwater Beach; 3) The amendments
refine but does not dilute the required characteristics of resort development eligible for the resort
density pool; and 4) The amendments provide another location eligible for the pool in light of
residential redevelopment of the Yacht Basin site.
In response to a question, Ms. Clayton explained the philosophy behind the operation
and maintenance assessment program for Clearwater beach is similar to the DDB (Downtown
Development Board) philosophy of helping to sweep streets, plant flowers, etc. Previously, staff
was not proactive in pursuing program partners. Now that a portion of the streetscaping project
has been completed, Ms. Clayton suggested the program may be considered as Beachwalk
plans move forward.
Member Moran moved to recommend approval of Item F2, Case: Amendment to Beach
by Design Special Area Plan. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
G. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS: (Item 1)
1. Case: FLD2004-03019 - 1339, 1341 and 1345 Park Street and 1344 Pierce Street
Owner: Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper Pinellas County.
Applicant: Clearwater Homeless Intervention Project, Inc.
Representative: Nina Bandoni, Turnstone Properties, Inc. (2519 McMullen-Booth Road,
Suite 510-126, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-712-1196; fax: 727-723-9221; email:
nina@turnstoneproperties.com).
Location: 1.3 acres located at the terminus of Park Street, approximately 250 feet west
of Evergreen Avenue.
Atlas Page: 287B.
Zoning Districts: Commercial (C) (0.832 acre); Medium Density Residential (MDR)
(0.472 acre).
Community Development 2004-06-15
22
.
.
.
l
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 378 square-foot expansion of a
residential shelter for the purpose of increasing the number of beds from 48 to 62, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial (C) District, under the
provisions of Section 2-704.C (existing parking lot on Pierce Street is zoned MDR
District and is not proposed to be modified).
Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing residential shelter.
Neighborhood Association: Gateway Neighborhood (Paul Charles, 1367 Park Street,
Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 813-205-8779).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.
The 1.3 acres generally are located at the terminus of Park Street, approximately 250
feet west of Evergreen Avenue, and approximately 700 feet west of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The
Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper Pinellas County, Inc, owns the site and CHIP
(Clearwater Homeless Intervention Project) leases the land from them for $1/year. The Park
Street frontage of the site, zoned Commercial (C). District, presently is developed with a soup
kitchen, a residential shelter of 48 beds, and a police substation. The soup kitchen is a
permitted use at this location and is not at issue with this application.
The site also includes property on Pierce Street, zoned Medium Density Residential
(MDR) District, that contains a single-family dwelling and a 24-space parking lot used by the
soup kitchen and CHIP/police facilities, which are not proposed to be modified. Commercial
uses are located to the north, fronting on Cleveland Street, and to the east, along Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard. Residential uses are located generally south of Park Street and west of Evergreen
Avenue.
On November 5, 1996, the former Planning and Zoning Board approved Conditional Use
CU96-46 with seven conditions to permit the 48-bed residential shelter and police substation to
co-locate on this property in conjunction with the existing soup kitchen. One of the conditions
adopted by the former Planning and Zoning Board required a new conditional use review of the
residential shelter use after a trial period of three years from the date the former board approved
the conditional use. Compliance with this condition did not occur in 1999. On July 15, 2003, the
COB (Community Development Board) re-approved Conditional Use CU96-46 with the following
conditions (* indicates prior condition of approval adopted November 5, 1996 that was carried
forward): 1) That the residential shelter only be permitted while the police substation and other
referral services are provided at this location;* 2) That other expansions to the CHIP campus be
reviewed by the Community Development Board; 3) That all site lighting continue to be
equipped with a 90-degree cut-off mechanism, with the light being directed downward and away
from adjoining residential properties and street rights-of-way, and additional lighting continue to
illuminate the perimeter of the site adjacent to non-residential areas;* 4) That efforts continue to
be made on the part of the CHIP organizations to contact specified neighborhood
representatives to coordinate and communicate issues and information on a regular basis or as
requested;* 5) That the existing six-foot high fencing be maintained on both sides (north and
south) of the property to control site access;* 6) That wheel stops for the three parking spaces
east of the eastern driveway on Park Street be relocated to the approved locations of 90-degree
design parking to comply with the original approved site plan, within 30 days; and 7) That signs
be re-erected along the sidewalk from CHIP along the south side of Park Street and the west
side of Evergreen Avenue, directing pedestrians to utilize that route, within 60 days.
Community Development 2004-06-15
23
.
.
.
The proposal is to permit a 378 square-foot expansion of the short-term residential
shelter for the purpose of increasing the number of beds from 48 to 62. The area proposed for
the building expansion is an existing outdoor deck for the police substation on the west side of
the building. The proposed building walls will not extend beyond the outline of the existing
outdoor deck. The proposed addition will meet the required side setback, will be constructed
with a stucco material to match the existing building with no exterior door, and will be painted to
match the existing building. All other setbacks to existing buildings or pavement, as well as all
landscaped areas, are not proposed to be modified under this proposal.
The mission of CHIP is to intervene in all issues that surround homelessness in
Clearwater and Upper Pinellas County. CHIP coordinates services among a broad spectrum of
service providers and community resources seeking to develop a continuum of care enabling
those who choose to move from homelessness to self-sufficiency. The program is multi-faceted
and aimed at assisting persons to confront the barriers and reasons that have put them in the
ranks of the homeless. As participants progress in the program, a more in depth plan is
established to help him/her back into the mainstream of society. The CHIP center is a 24-hour,
seven day per week, residential emergency shelter. It also operates a daytime outreach
program from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. daily when any homeless person can go to CHIP for a
shower, to do laundry, make a phone call, receive mail, obtain clothing, receive mental health
counseling, have a sandwich, and get help with their problems.
The average shelter stay is 16 days. Each person staying at the shelter must commit to
participate in the Homeless Intervention Program - an intensive case management model. The
case manager conducts an initial intake assessment, wherein the specific needs and goals of
the client are established. These goals determine the length of stay for the client. If
employment has not been secured at entry, the client must pledge to obtain full-time
employment within seven days, or show reasonable efforts in doing so. After the client is
employed, s/he establishes a budget including a personal savings plan. The client's continued
eligibility is based on the client's compliance with his/her own established goals.
The CHIP program was approved in 1996 for the 48-bed shelter and re-approved on
July 15, 2003. The short-term residential shelter and police substation were purposefully
located adjacent to the soup kitchen, which is a permitted use, as being compatible uses. Noise
has not appeared to be a factor in the neighborhood. Minimal vehicular traffic is attributable to
the short-term residential shelter. Pedestrian traffic has been directed to sidewalks constructed
along Evergreen and Park Street, augmented by signage, to reduce pedestrian traffic in
adjacent residential areas. Site lighting restrictions and methods to control lighting found
acceptable in 1998 remain valid. Issues of crime and property values were reviewed during
public hearings in July 2003. The proposed addition will not contribute to increased crime in the
area, or any substantial decrease in property values. The short-term residential shelter and the
adjacent, under construction, transitional residential shelter at 1353-1357 Park Street were
found to be consistent with the proposed Downtown Plan Update (later adopted by the City and
effective upon adoption by the Countywide Planning Authority on February 3, 2004) during the
public hearings on those cases in July, 2003. The proposed expansion is consistent with the
adopted Downtown Plan.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General
Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria
(Section 2-704.C) have been met.
Community Development 2004-06-15
24
.
.
.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development
request to permit a 378 square-foot expansion of a residential shelter for the purpose of
increasing the number of beds from 48 to 62, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
in the Commercial (C) District, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C (existing parking lot on
Pierce Street is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District and is not proposed to be
modified for the site at 1339, 1341, and 1345 Park Street and 1344 Pierce Street, with the
following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible
Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2)
The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development is compatible with the
surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts AND Conditions of Approval:
(*Indicates prior conditions of approval adopted July 15, 2003, that are carried forward) 1) That
the residential shelter only be permitted while the police substation and other referral services
are provided at this location;* 2) That other expansions to the CHIP campus be reviewed by the
Community Development Board;* 3) That all site lighting continue to be equipped with a 90-
degree cut-off mechanism, with the light being directed downward and away from adjoining
residential properties and street rights-of-way, and additional lighting continue to illuminate the
perimeter of the site adjacent to non-residential areas;* 4) :rhat efforts continue to be made on
the part of the CHIP organizations to contact specified neighborhood representatives to
coordinate and communicate issues and information on a regular basis or as requested;* and 5)
That the existing six-foot high fencing be maintained on both sides (north and south) of the
property to control site access.*
In response to a question, Police Chief Sid Klein, applicant, said a number of citizens
have attended meetings regarding this project and expressed their concerns. Most concerns
relate to patrons arriving on-site prior to opening time and that a gate had been left open. The
neighborhood was notified of this hearing.
In response to a concern that 14 additional beds are planned for a limited space, Mr.
Wells said some beds would be relocated within the facility. Beds for males and females are
segregated.
Nina Bandoni, Turnstone Properties, reported bunk beds will be installed.
Chief Klein said last year, the CDB (Community Development Board) had approved a
transitional housing project, which soon will be completed. CHIP is interviewing residents to
move from the shelter into the new facility. A grand opening is scheduled for June 22, 2004.
He reported the CHIP facility has a police substation, maintains required lighting around the
property's perimeter, maintains required fencing at the Outreach Center, locks gates to reduce
foot traffic on Evergreen Avenue, adjusted wheel stops on Park Street, erected signage along
the south side of Park and west side of Evergreen Avenue, directing pedestrians to use that
route, held quarterly neighborhood meetings featuring guest speakers, and worked off-site, on
an individual basis with area residents.
Chief Klein said last year, when CDB reviewed CHIP's conditional use application and
approved the 8-unit transitional housing, residents had expressed concerns that: 1)
Neighborhood crime had increased; 2) the center caused property values to decrease; and 3)
Community Development 2004-06-15
25
.
.
.
the facility's location caused businesses to struggle. During that hearing, CHIP had provided
statistics that demonstrated: 1) Current criminal activity is similar to area activity prior to CHI p's
construction; 2) calls for police service are similar; 3) area property values appreciated 31 %
from 1996 to 2002, in keeping with other sections of the City; and 4) two CHIP-funded surveys
indicate people reported an improvement in homeless associated issues in Clearwater.
Chief Klein said CHIP has developed a master plan for its campus. A shortage of
available beds for temporary shelter continues. Since opening in April 1998, CHIP has served
more than 5,600 individuals. On average, 100 to 150 people are turned away daily, due to the
lack of beds.
In response to a question, Chief Klein said anyone seeking services at the St. Vincent de
Paul soup kitchen must show proof of residency. Not all soup kitchen clients are homeless.
Those who cannot provide proof of residency must enroll in the CHIP intervention program. He
said the soup kitchen, not the shelter, generates significant foot traffic.
One person spoke in support of the application.
Ed Brant, CHIP Executive Director, said not all homeless persons fit the stereotype.
Some have been abused, were turned down for jobs, faced tragic circumstances, or attend
school in an attempt to improve their lives and obtain jobs, etc. In response to a question, Mr.
Brant said shelter staff follows the progress of each client for one year after leaving the
program. Those who maintain employment and housing for one year after leaving the shelter
no longer are considered homeless.
One person spoke in opposition of the application.
Ms. Bandoni said all CHIP projects are scrutinized to ensure they will fit in and enhance
the neighborhood. She said all complaints were considered carefully and addressed. She said
CHIP will continue to address neighborhood concerns.
Discussion ensued with comments that the need for homeless shelters is obvious, all
have a responsibility to help those in need, other municipalities and the County should
financially support City efforts, creative thinking is needed to redevelop the downtown core
between Myrtle Avenue and Highland, and that Clearwater is fortunate to have on staff Police
Chief Sid Klein, who recognized the need to address homeless issues many years ago.
Member Moran moved to approve Item G1, Case FLD2004-03019 for 1339,1341, and
1345 Park Street and 1344 Pierce Street, with the Basses of Approval and Conditions for
Approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
H. DIRECTOR'S ITEM:
Update On The Downtown Design Guidelines
Ms. Clayton said in December 2003, a committee was formed to work on Downtown
Design Guidelines. The committee is comprised of members of the Mainstreet Design
Committee, local architects, a contractor, and a CDB and DDB representative. Meetings are
held several times a month. Provisions will apply to new construction, designated historic
Community Development 2004-06-15
26
.
.
.
structures, signage, and miscellaneous requirements. The final meeting is scheduled for June
29, 2004.
In August 2004, the guidelines will be presented to the public, Downtown stakeholders,
and Downtown neighborhood groups, before being presented to the CDB in September. The
guidelines will be amendments to the Downtown Plan. Committee meeting minutes and
proposed guidelines are available for review on the City's website.
Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani said staff has discussed pressures related to
development review with City administration. Staff will accept suggestions related to
streamlining the application and other processes. Staff is considering adding minimum
standards to the Code for T and D Districts, which currently require staff level review.
Consensus was to schedule the August 17, 2004, CDB meeting at 1:00 p.m. to review
the guidelines prior to regularly scheduled business. Guidelines will be distributed to CDB
members prior to the meeting.
I. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 4:11 p.m.
-c~~
Chair -- '-J
Community Development Board
Community Development 2004-06-15
27
v
yt;::;
1315 S Fort Harrison rnue
/ yes
1339,1341 & 1345 Park Street
1344 Pierce Street /
V yes
190 Brightwater Drive
~es
15-17 Sommerset Street &
16 Cambria Street I
yes
llU
FLD2004-02006
no
FLD2004-030 19
no
FLD2004-120691
TDR2004-12005
no
FLD2004-0 1 0021
TDR2004-0 1 006
no
Corbett Development, Inc.
Society ofS1. Vincent DePaul of Upper
Pinellas County
Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC.
Husgen Properties, Inc.
I
,f
\
Community Development Board:
Meeting Date: June 15" 2004
~es
FLD2004-0 1004/
TDR2004-0 1007
DIDomizio Investments, Inc.
638 - 650 Poinsettia Avenue
no
504 Jasmine Way I
yes
FLD2004-030 17/
PL T2004-00003
E. Joy1n, Inc., Craig Murtha and
Robert Resnik
no
514 South GU1fVLw Boulevard
,; yes
FLD2003-11057
ACS Resorts Inc.
no
S:\P1anning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
Date:
Signature:
2
~
..
't'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June15'12004
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
926 South Myrtle A\~e
A yes
FLD2004-02008
Patrick J Shaughnessy & Sheryl M. Haynes
no
FLD2004-02006
Corbett Development, Inc.
no
1339,1341 & 13?(a. . Street
1344 Pierce Stree
yes
FLD2004-030 19
Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper
Pinellas County
no
190 Brightwate~s
FLD2004-120691
TDR2004-12005
Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC.
no
FLD2004-0 10021
TDR2004-01006
Husgen Properties, Inc.
no
r ,
,
,
.
Community Development Board:
Meeting Date: June 15.. 2004
638 - 650 Poinsettia Avenue
FLD2004-0 1 004/
TDR2004-01007
-ffes
no
504 Jasmine Wa~ /
!\ yes
FLD2004-03017/
PL T2004-00003
no
514 SOUthXi:W Boulevard
es
FLD2003-11057
no
Signature:
DIDomizio Investments, Inc.
E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha and
Robert Resnik
ACS Resorts Inc.
D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
2
Date: ~ ft \
~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June15'l2004
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
926 South Myrtle Avenue
FLD2004-02008
Patrick J Shaughnessy & Sheryl M. Haynes
~ yes
no
1315 S Fort Harrison Avenue
FLD2004-02006
Corbett Development, Inc.
,----yes
no
1339,1341 & 1345 Park Street
1344 Pierce Street
FLD2004-030 19
Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper
Pinellas County
~yes
no
190 Brightwater Drive
FLD2004-120691
TDR2004-12005
Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC.
~yes
no
15-17 Sommerset Street &
16 Cambria Street
FLD2004-0 1 0021
TDR2004-01006
Husgen Properties, Inc.
~yes
no
'"
Community Development Board:
Meeting Date: June 15" 2004
638 - 650 Poinsettia Avenue
FLD2004-0 1004/
TDR2004-0I007
DIDomizio Investments, Inc.
~yes
no
504 Jasmine Way
FLD2004-030 17/
PL T2004-00003
E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha and
Robert Resnik
~yes
no
514 South Gulf View Boulevard
FLD2003-II057
ACS Resorts Inc.
~yes
no
Signatuf1'~~
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
Date: \i\\S\~i
2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June15~2004
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
926 South Myrtle Avenue
~2004-02008
~no
yes
\/1315 S Fort Harrison Avenue
FLD2004-02006
./
no
yes
1339,1341 & 1345 Park Street
1344 Pierce Street /
V yes
FLD2004-030 19
no
~t' 90 Brightwater Drive
/ yes
FLD2004-120691
TDR2004-12005
no
15-17 Sommerset Street &
(. / 16 Cambria Stree\/t
1,/
yes
FLD2004-0 1 0021
TDR2004-01006
no
Patrick J Shaughnessy & Sheryl M. Haynes
Corbett Development, Inc.
Society ofSt. Vincent DePaul of Upper ?
Pinellas County
Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC.
Husgen Properties, Inc.
Community Development Board:
Meeting Date: June 15" 2004
\/' 638 - 650 Poinsettia Avenue
/ yes
504 Jasmine Way
yes
FLD2004-0 1 004/
TDR2004-01007
no
FLD2004-03017/
JLT2004-00003
no
V"i14 South Gulf View Boulevard /D2003-11 057
yes no
Signature:
DIDomizio Investments, Inc.
E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha and
Robert Resnik
ACS Resorts Inc.
Date:
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
2
,..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June15~2004
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
926 South Myrtle Avenue
/yes
FLD2004-02008
Patrick J Shaughnessy & Sheryl M. Haynes
no
1315 S Fort Harrison Avenue
/ yes
FLD2004-02006
Corbett Development, Inc.
no
1339,1341 & 1345 Park Street
1344 Pierce Street
FLD2004-030 19
Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper
Pinellas County
yes
/ no
190 Brightwater Drive
FLD2004-12069/
TDR2004-12005
Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC.
/yes
no
15-17 Sommerset Street &
16 Cambria Street
J yes
FLD2004-0 1002/
TDR2004-01006
Husgen Properties, Inc.
no
,.
Community Development Board:
Meeting Date: June 15'1 2004
638 -650 Poinsettia Avenue
FLD2004-0 1004/
TDR2004-0 1007
DIDomizio Investments, Inc.
/yes
no
504 Jasmine Way
FLD2004-030 17/
PL T2004-00003
E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha and
Robert Resnik
/yes
no
514 South Gulf View Boulevard
/ yes
FLD2003-11057
ACS Resorts Inc.
no
Signature:
Date: ~lld~1
B, property investigation check list.doc
2
,
t'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: June15~2004
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
926 South Myrtle Avenue
X yes
FLD2004-02008
Patrick J Shaughnessy & Sheryl M. Haynes
no
1315 S Fort Harrison Avenue
FLD2004-02006
Corbett Development, Inc.
^ yes
no
1339,1341 & 1345 Park Street
1344 Pierce Street
FLD2004-030 19
Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper
Pine lIas County
'i yes
no
190 Brightwater Drive
FLD2004-120691
TDR2004-12005
Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC.
yes '/J no
15-17 Sommerset Street &
16 Cambria Street
yes
FLD2004-0 10021
TDR2004-01006
'x. no
~
Husgen Properties, Inc.
.
Community Development Board:
Meeting Date: June 15~ 2004
638 - 650 Poinsettia Avenue
FLD2004-0 1 004/
TDR2004-0 1 007
DIDomizio Investments, Inc.
yes
x
"
no
504 Jasmine Way
FLD2004-030 17/
PL T2004-00003
E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha and
Robert Resnik
~ yes
no
514 South Gulf View Boulevard
FLD2003-11057
ACS Resorts Inc.
yes
~
no
Signature:
tl4)4r;
Date:
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
2