Loading...
05/18/2004 . . . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER May 18, 2004 Present: Ed Hooper John Doran David Gildersleeve Shirley Moran Edward Mazur, Jr. Daniel Dennehy Chair Vice Chair Board Member Board Member Board Member Acting Board Member - departed 4:39 p.m. Absent: Alex Plisko Kathy Milam Board Member Board Member Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Cyndi Tarapani Lisa Fierce Frank Gerlock Brenda Moses Assistant City Attorney Planning Director Assistant Planning Director Development Review Manager Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: April 20, 2004 Member Moran moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of April 20, 2004, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE (To June 15, 2004, Meeting) (Items 1-2): 1. Case: CPA2004-04001 Amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department Request: Amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan revising Policy 2.1.4 of the Future Land Use Plan Element with regard to the areas eligible for the density pool of additional hotel rooms established in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager. AND Community Development 2004-05-18 1 . . . 2. Case: Amendment to Beach by Design Special Area Plan. Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department Request: Amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines revising the areas eligible for the resort density pool, the timeframe the resort density pool is available and the characteristics which make a project eligible for the pool. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; em ail: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager. Member Gildersleeve moved to continue Items D1, Case CPA2004-04001, and D2, Case: Amendment to Beach by Design Special Area Plan to June 15, 2004. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting (Items 1-6): 1. Item Pulled from Consent Agenda Case: FLD2004-01003 - 409 Hamden Drive Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: Scott O. Barrows. Representative: Jay F. Myers, Architect, 9170 Oakhurst Road, Suite 3B, Seminole FL 33776; phone: 727-595-7100; Fax 727-595-7138; email: mversarch@IX.netcom.com Location: 0.34 acre on the northeast corner of Bayside Drive and Hamden Drive. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning District: T, Tourist. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 to 10 feet (to building), a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 to 12.83 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 to seven feet (to pavement), and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 to zero feet (to pool deck), and a height increase from 35 to 48.3 feet under the provisions of Section 2-803. B Proposed Use: A 10-unit development of attached, multi-family units. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner. This 0.34-acre site is on the northeast corner of Bayside Drive and Hamden Drive, with frontage on Clearwater Harbor to the immediate north. Overnight accommodations dominate the immediate vicinity to the west, south, and east. Directly across Clearwater Harbor, northward, is Brightwater Drive area that is transitioning from small motels to mid-rise attached dwellings. By Code, the allowable density on this site is 13 hotel units or 10 dwelling units. The site contains a single-story, 15-unit Sun West Beach Motel, with back-out parking on Bayside Drive and Hamden Drive. A swimming pool is on the north side of the site and some deck areas are at the north and south sides of the site. The motel and its parking area fit tightly on the site. There is a small amount of landscaping and a freestanding sign. One dock, at the north side of the site, will be maintained with this redevelopment request. In April 2004, a Community Development 2004-05-18 2 . . . Flexible Standard Development application (FLS2004-02008) for a watercraft rental business Uet skis), as an accessory to the existing motel, was approved for four jet skis. The proposal is to raze the existing motel and construct 10 attached dwellings. The application seeks approval of the use and setback reductions to building, pavement and pool deck, plus an increase in height. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to general applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and the flexibility criteria for attached units (Section 2-803.B), have been met. The new development will have a swimming pool on the north side of the site, built in the same location as the existing pool. Vehicular and pedestrian safety will be improved, as there will no longer be back-out parking onto Bayside and Hamden drives. Sidewalks will be provided along Bayside and Hamden drives. The request for additional building height will allow a smaller building footprint with more green space area. To compensate for the reduction, setbacks, and the increase in building height, the layout of the site will include considerable landscaping on four sides of the property. The project design is consistent with Beach by Design, which includes this site in the Small Motel District. The proposed new building is four stories above parking. The architectural style includes a curved framing structure atop the building, supported by columns. A 12.8 square-foot monument sign proposed for the southwest corner of the site, will be less than four feet in height, outside the visibility triangle, and will meet the five-foot setback. The overall proposal will be an asset to the beach. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on March 4, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 to 10 feet (to building) along Bayside Drive, a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 to 12.83 feet (to building) along Hamden Drive, a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 to seven feet (to pavement), and a reduction of the side (north) setback from 20 to zero feet (to pool deck), and a height increase from 35 to 48.83 feet (with height calculated from base flood elevation to the midpoint of the roof) under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria per Section 2-803.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB (Community Development Board); 2. That all proposed utilities (from the rights-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontages be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy; 3. That boats moored at the existing and any future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums; Community Development 2004-05-18 3 . . 4. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally-integrated into the design of the site and building; 5. That there be no jet ski or other like watercraft rental businesses at this location; 6. That the site data table indicates both the maximum and proposed impervious surface ratio; 7. That Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees be satisfied prior to the issuance of building permits or final plat, whichever occurs first; 8. That all Fire Department requirements be addressed prior to building permit issuance; 9. That Traffic Impact Fees be determined and paid prior to Certificate of Occupancy issuance; and 10. That use of the site as a rental property conform to Code. Senior Planner Mike Reynolds said the height increase as requested could have been approved as a Level One application. However, two side setback reductions required this application to be considered under a Level Two review. Scott Barrows, applicant, said some developers have approached him to sell this property. He has decided to redevelop it himself. He said single-family housing is east of the subject property, which is surrounded by motels. He said the majority of neighbors, who he contacted, support the project. He said the project's unique design, featuring a rounded roof, will set the project apart from nearby motels. In response to a question, Mr. Barrows said the roof material will be concrete and steel, and the building will be painted white with blue highlights. The upper two living units will be narrower than other units, will be set back two feet from the lower floors, and will feature wrap-around balconies. Jay Myers, representative, said his client considered the elements of Beach by Design when designing this project. He said the project will have sitting areas and lighting consistent with the beach and roundabout. In response to a question, Mr. Myers said only one 12 square- foot sign will be on the site. Mr. Barrows plans to live in the complex. In response to a discussion regarding rental minimums, Assistant Planning Director Lisa Fierce said the minimum stay required is 30-31 days. Mr. Barrows said he would conform to the rental regulations of the Code. One person spoke in support of the application and one person spoke in opposition. Mr. Barrows said he spoke to the resident concerned about how a shadow from this project could affect his residence. He said the project will not affect the amount of sunlight on that neighbor's property and he does not feel it will infringe on nearby properties. In response to a question, Mr. Myers said the flat roof would be 44 feet above base flood elevation. The lowest part of the building is 44 feet high. In response to a question, Mr. Reynolds confirmed if not for requested setbacks, this application could have been approved as a Level One application for 50 feet of height. Member Moran moved to approve Item #E, Case FLD2004-01003 for 409 Harnden Drive. The motion was duly seconded. Mr. Reynolds requested the motion include a condition that rentals in the complex conform to Code. Member Moran amended the motion to add a condition that use of the site as a rental . property conform to Code. The seconder agreed. The motion carried unanimously. Community Development 2004-05-18 4 . . . 2. Case: FLD2004-02014 - 2551 Gulf-to-Bay-Boulevard Leve/ Two Application Owner/Applicant: Hardees Lease Partners. Representative: Stephen Fowler, Fowler Architects, Inc. (1421 Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-449-2021; fax: 727-447-5339; email: fowlerarch@aol.com). Location: 0.66-acre on the south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 400 feet west of US19. Atlas Page: 299B. Zoning District: C, Commercial Request: Flexible Development to permit reductions to the front (north) setback along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from 25 to 15 feet to pavement, the front (west) setback along Bypass Drive from 25 to five feet to pavement, the side (south) setback from 10 to zero feet to pavement, the side (east) setback from 10 to three feet to pavement, reduce the amount of parking from 15 spaces per 1,000 square-feet to 9.7 spaces per 1,000 square-feet for restaurant, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per section 2-704.C. Proposed Use: Dunkin Donuts restaurant. Neighborhood Association: None. Presenter: Bryan S. Berry, Planner. The 0.66-acre site is on the south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, approximately 400 feet west of US 19. Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, a commercial corridor, runs east to west from Tampa to Clearwater, with predominately retail and restaurant uses. The proposed site is an outparcel in the northwest corner of Sam's Wholesale Club lot. The existing 3,575 square-foot, single-story building on the parcel originally was developed as a drive-thru fast food restaurant. The last use to occupy the parcel was an adult entertainment business. The property has three access points on the south and eastern portions of the property and 37 existing parking spaces. All access is via a shared ingress/egress agreement with Sam's Club. The building currently is vacant and deteriorating. The parcel is largely overgrown with landscaping and vegetation. A grade change on the site slopes from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard to the Sam's Club lot. The drive- thru lane is enclosed by a retaining wall. The request is to permit a drive-thru restaurant (combined Dunkin Donuts and Baskin Robbins) use to occupy the building. The applicant proposes to renovate approximately 3,308 square-feet of the existing structure. This store will provide baking services for other area stores, with approximately 1,200 square-feet, devoted exclusively to kitchen and storage uses. The remaining 2,108 square feet will be used for seating and serving area. A restaurant use requires 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area as a minimum standard development. The applicant requests a reduction in the amount of parking from 50 required spaces, at 15 per 1,000 square-feet, to 32 parking spaces, at 9.7 spaces per 1,000 square-feet of gross floor area. The flexibility criteria under restaurant states that fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the number of off-street parking spaces. The application, therefore, is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. If the large kitchen area (non-traffic generator) were deducted from the parking calculation, the parking requirement at 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square-feet would be 36 spaces. The proposal includes 32 spaces. A parking study was conducted on Tuesday, April 6, 2004, between 6:00 a.m. and 11 :00 a.m., peak business hours for a Dunkin Donuts shop. The study shows that parking is located within the vicinity to accommodate any additional parking generated by the proposed use. The Community Development 2004-05-18 5 . . . adjacent Sam's Wholesale Club has a total of 570 parking spaces, according to the study, with a peak demand of 226 occupied spaces at 11 :00 a.m. Most parking for Sam's Wholesale Club located next to the street is farthest from the stores entrance and could accommodate additional parking for the Dunkin Donuts peak business hours, if necessary. Although the study showed adequate parking, the applicant could not secure a written shared parking agreement with Sam's Club. The parcel originally was built as a fast food restaurant with drive-thru. The nature of the proposed restaurant use (Dunkin Donuts/Basking Robbins) is not characteristic of a traditional fast food restaurant that provides for three (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) meals a day. As seen from the analysis above, over one-third of the proposed facility will serve a non-traffic generating use by providing baking/kitchen and storage use for other regional Dunkin Donuts. The early morning peak business hours of Dunkin Donuts, coupled with the nature of the proposed facility, will justify the reduction in the amount of parking. The restaurant will offer coffee, donuts, and ice cream at all store hours. Hours of operation are not known, but many operate similar stores 24 hours a day. The applicant requests reductions to the front (north) setback along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from 25 to 15 feet to pavement. The existing setback is 10 feet from property line to pavement. The five additional feet to be provided will allow for additional landscaping. The other reductions in setbacks are to existing pavement. The proposed landscape plan will need some amendments, especially along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, including a tiered landscape effect along the road frontage, replacement of existing materials in poor condition, using plants tolerant of cold weather, and changing plants along the drive-thru retaining walls. All existing points of access to the property will remain within this requested approval. The site can be accessed from Bypass Drive to the west of the property or along the shared ingress/egress entry from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The traffic circulation will run counter clockwise to the subject parcel, as cars can access the site from two separate locations and exit from three. The building will be renovated with a light tan cement plaster. The trim along the bottom and top of the structure will be brown. Colors utilized for the renovation are characteristic of Dunkin Donuts/Baskin Robbins corporate color schemes and include pink accents. The proposal includes stripped awnings over all windows and doors. The fabric should be of matte finish and the colors should complement the building design. The retaining walls and railing along the drive-thru need to be improved with cleaning, paint and landscaping. Although no formal signage plan was submitted, attached signs are shown on the north, east and west elevations and a freestanding sign is proposed along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. This informal submittal is in excess of Code provisions. The trim/frame that surrounds the proposed attached signs should be eliminated to enhance the design of the building. The dumpster location is to remain with improvements to meet current City standards. It must be designed to match the building, including a new opaque gate. A four-yard dumpster will be used and rolled out for service. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on April 1, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development to permit reductions to the front (north) setback along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from 25 to 15 feet to pavement, the front (west) setback along Bypass Drive from 25 to five feet to pavement, the side (south) setback from 10 to zero feet to pavement, the side (east) setback from 10 to three Community Development 2004-05-18 6 . feet to pavement, and reduce the required number of parking spaces from 15 spaces per 1,000 square-feet (50 spaces) to 9.7 spaces per 1,000 square feet (32 spaces) for a restaurant, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per section 2-704.C., for the site at 2551 Gulf-to- Bay Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal complies with the other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The redevelopment will upgrade the existing parcel and immediate vicinity. . Conditions of Approval: 1. That any change in the function/operation of the restaurant (e.g. proportion of space devoted to kitchen/storage or change of use) may require approval by the Community Development Board; 2. That the final design of the building be consistent with revised elevations submitted (with the elimination of the trim/frame around the sign) and colors be approved by Planning staff; 3. That the awning materials have a matte finish (no gloss material) and be consistent in color with the building, to the satisfaction of staff; 4. That a revised landscape plan be submitted within 30 days, by June 18, 2004, or prior to submittal of a building permit (whichever occurs first), addressing concerns herein; 5. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally-integrated into the design of the building and site; 6. That the dumpster enclosure be designed to match the building in terms of color, materials, and architecture; and 7. That the retaining walls and railing be cleaned, painted, and landscaped. AND 3. Case: ANX2004-02003 - 193 and 197 Elizabeth Avenue Leve/ Three Application Owner/Applicant: Jeanne Bridges. Representative: Steven Kozenieski (phone: 727-542-4530; fax: 727-771-7605). Location: 0.43-acre on the east side of Elizabeth Avenue, approximately 810 feet north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. Atlas Page: 291 B. Request: a) Annexation of 0.43-acre of property and 0.04-acre of abutting Elizabeth Avenue right- of-way to the City of Clearwater; b) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Urban (RU) Category (County) to the Residential Urban (RU) Category (City of Clearwater); and c) Rezoning from the AE, Agriculture Estates Residential District (County) to the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (City of Clearwater). Proposed Use: Single-family home. Neighborhood Association(s): None. Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner. . This annexation involves two vacant parcels totaling 0.48 acre on the east side of Elizabeth Avenue, approximately 600 feet north of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The property is contiguous with existing City boundaries to the north, south, east and west; therefore, the Community Development 2004-05-18 7 . . . proposed annexation eliminates an enclave and is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It is proposed that the property have a Future Land Use designation of Residential Low (RU), and a zoning category of LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential. The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and because it will eliminate an enclave. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the annexation of the property at 193 and 197 Elizabeth Avenue. AND 4. Case: LUZ2004-03003 - 2950 Glen Oak Avenue Leve/ Three Application Owner/Applicant: City of Clearwater. Representative: Terry Finch, City of Clearwater Environmental Manager (phone: 727- 562-4742; fax: 727-562-4755). location: 36.6-acres at the western terminus of Glen Oak Avenue, approximately 800 feet north of Drew Street and 500 feet west of McMullen-Booth Road. Atlas Page: 282B. Request: a) Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Urban (RU) to Recreation, Open Space (R/OS); and b) Zoning Atlas amendment from MHP, Mobile Home Park to OS/R, Open Space / Recreation. Proposed Use: Kapok Wetland Floodplain Restoration Project (open space/recreation) Neighborhood Association(s): None. Type of land Use Plan Amendment: Large Scale. Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner. This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves one parcel of land, approximately 36.6 acres in area. The site currently is vacant and has a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Urban (RU) and a zoning classification of MHP, Mobile Home Park. The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation to the Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) classification and to rezone it to the OSR, Open Space/Recreation District to create the Kapok Wetland and Floodplain Restoration Project. It is proposed to restore the subject property to the natural environment as well as increase the habitat area for native wildlife in, and adjacent to, the property. The property will create a wildlife corridor between the subject property and the Cliff Stephens Park, west of the property. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to the approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the size of the plan amendment request, review and approval by Florida Department of Community Affairs is required. An amendment of the FLUP from Residential Urban (RU) to Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) and a rezoning from MHP, Mobile Home Park District, to the OS/R, Open Community Development 2004-05-18 8 . Space/Recreation District for the subject site is requested. The subject site is 36.6 acres. Single-family residential dwellings to the north and east, and multi-family residential to the west surround the neighborhood. The proposed change will be consistent with the City-owned Eddie C. Moore Recreation Complex to the south and create a connecting corridor from Cliff Stephens Park to the west. The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. The proposed Recreation/Open Space, (RlOS) Future Land Use classification and OS/R, Open Space/Recreation zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, and is compatible with the natural environment. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions and conditions on the request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Urban (RU) classification (County) to the Recreation/Open Space (R/OS) classification, and 2) Rezoning from the MHP, Mobile Home Park District to the OS/R, Open Space/Recreation District. AND 5. Case: ANX2004-03004 - 2025 North Highland Avenue Level Three Application Owner: Leonard and Mary Chetkin. Applicant: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Representative: Alex Panik, Panik Engineering (phone: 727-934-5120; fax: 727-934- 4179). Location: 4.4 acres on the east side of North Highland Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet north of Sunset Point Road. Atlas Page: 252A. Request: Annexation of 4.4 acres to the City of Clearwater to be included as part of a pending land use and zoning case (LUZ2004-05004); Proposed Use: Multi-family residential. Neighborhood Association(s): None. Presenter: Mark 1. Parry, Planner. . This annexation involves a 4.4-acre property consisting of three parcels, on the east side of North Highland Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet north of Sunset Point Road. The property is contiguous with existing City boundaries on all sides, therefore, the proposed annexation will eliminate an enclave and is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant requests this annexation to receive sanitary sewer service. A companion application to change the Future Land Use Plan category of the entire site from Residential Low (RL) to Residential High (RH), and to rezone it from A-E, Agricultural Estate (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District is being processed concurrently with this annexation request in LUZ2004-03002 (Agenda Item E6). . The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including water, sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation and eliminates an enclave. Community Development 2004-05-18 9 . Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the requested annexation. AND 6. Case: LUZ2004-03002 - 2025 North Highland Avenue Level Three Application Owner: Leonard and Mary Chetkin. Applicant: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Representative: Alex Panik, Panik Engineering (phone: 727-934-5120; fax: 727-934- 4179). Location: 4.4 acres on the east side of North Highland Avenue approximately 1,300 feet north of Sunset Point Road. Atlas Page: 252A. Request: a) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low Classification (RL) (County) to Residential High Classification (RH) (City) (pending ANX2004-02004); and b) Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City of Clearwater) (pending ANX2004-02004). Proposed Use: Multi-family residential. Neighborhood Association(s): None. Type of Land Use Plan Amendment: Large Scale. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. . This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves three parcels of land, approximately 4.4 acres in area included in a companion application to annex the overall property into the City of Clearwater (ANX2004-03004). The site is occupied by two single-family dwellings and has a FLUP designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning classification of A-E, Agricultural Estate (County). The applicant requests to amend the FLUP designation of the site to the Residential High (RH) classification and to rezone it to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. If approved, the site will be developed with attached dwellings. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the density of the amendment request, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is required. An amendment of the FLUP from the Residential Low (RL) category to the Residential High (RH) category and a rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District for the subject site is requested. This 4.4-acre site exceeds the minimum requirements for the proposed use of the property as attached dwellings. The property is surrounded by multi- and single-family residential dwellings to the north, south, east, and west. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning is compatible with the neighborhood. . The proposed Residential High (RH) Future Land Use classification and MHDR, Medium High Density Residential zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Community Development 2004-05-18 10 . . . Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions and conditions on the request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low Classification (RL) (County) to the Residential High (RU) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004), and 2) Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estates (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City) (pending ANX2004-03004). Acting Board Member Dennehy moved to approve Consent Agenda Item E2, Case FLD2004-02014 for 2551 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, and to recommend approval of Item E3, Case ANX2004-02003 for 193 - 197 Elizabeth Avenue, Item E4, Case LUZ2004-03003 for 2950 Glen Oak Avenue, Item E5, Case ANX2004-03004 for 2025 North Highland Avenue, and Item E6, Case LUZ2004-03002 for 2025 North Highland Avenue. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. F. LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS (Item 1): 1. Case: FLD2003-11 059 - 202 Windward Passage Owner: High and Dry Marina Inc. Applicant: Windward Passage Condominiums LLC. Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036; email: nestech@mindsprinq.com). Location: 1.83 acres on the north side of the western terminus of Windward Passage. Atlas Page: 267 A. Zoning District: HDR, High Density Residential. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 55 attached dwellings in the High Density Residential District with reductions to the front (south) setback along Windward Passage from 25 to 11.5 feet (to building), from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement) and from 25 to 12 feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the rear setback from 15 to 13 feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 30 to 60 feet (to roof deck), as a Residentiallnfill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-504.F (retaining the existing floating docks for sole use by the property owners). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (55). Neighborhood Association: Island Estates Civic Association (John Bosmosky, P.O. Box 3154, Clearwater, FL 33767). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. The 1.83-acre site is on the north side of the western terminus of Windward Passage. The site currently is developed with a high and dry marina, with the building approximately 40 feet in height. The existing building is a massive vertical and horizontal blank fagade, due to the nature of the existing use, a large warehouse, for the dry storage of boats with no windows or fenestrations. Offices, the Clearwater Marine Institute, and boat repair businesses are to the southeast. Two-story town homes, above ground level, and individual garages are directly to the south. The Sunset Sam Park also is to the south, and west of the townhomes. At the western terminus of Windward Passage (Island Yacht Club) is a wet marina. To the east and north, which are two stories above ground level and have individual garages, is the Village on Island Estates condominiums. The proposal includes constructing a 55-unit (condominiums), five-story building over ground-level parking. This parcel previously was zoned Commercial (C) District, with a Commercial General (CG) land use category. In 2003, to provide for redevelopment of the Community Development 2004-05-18 11 . . . property for attached dwellings, zoning was changed to High Density Residential (HDR) District and the land use category was amended to Residential High (RH) (Case LUZ2002-11011). As a Flexible Development request in the HDR District, the height of a building for attached dwellings could be between 30 and 130 feet. While this request is being processed as a Residentiallnfill Project due to requested reductions to setbacks, Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings in the HDR District permit the building height to exceed 80 feet when the parcel fronts on Clearwater Bay or is separated from Clearwater Bay by a public open space. This proposal seeks to construct a residential building only 60 feet in height. Parapets will not exceed the Code provisions of 30-inches above the roof deck and elevator/stair/mechanical rooms will not exceed the maximum of 16 feet above the roof deck. The site presently contains eight floating docks used for the High and Dry marina. The docks will be retained at this time for sole use by the residents and guests of the project. In the future, the applicant anticipates reconstructing these docks, which will require Community Development Board review of a Flexible Development request for a multi-use dock, and potentially will include a boardwalk over the water at the seawall. Additionally, the proposal includes submerged lands to the north that currently is developed with docks for the Village on Island Estates Condominiums. The applicant is not proposing any change to these docks or the use of these docks by the Village of Island Estates Condominiums residents. The site today has parking spaces that primarily are south of the existing building, with many backing into the right-of-way of Windward Passage. Points of access are located on the eastern portion of the site (vacated Dory Passage) and on the western portion at the cul-de-sac. Access and parking will be reconstructed to remove all parking within and backing into the right- of-way and will restrict points of access to the eastern portion of the site at the vacated Dory Passage location and on the western portion at the cul-de-sac. The proposal includes ground- level parking for 112 parking spaces, at a ratio of 2.04 parking spaces per unit. By Code, only 83 parking spaces are required at the ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit. Code requires parking to be screened from adjacent rights-of-way and parcels of land by a four-foot high wall or fence. The proposal includes a four-foot high wall along Windward Passage, but has not indicated a wall or fence along the east and northern portion of the site. Approval of this request should include a condition to provide such on the site plan prior to the issuance of any permits. This proposal also includes eight metered, parallel parking spaces within the Windward Passage right-of-way for park users and guests. The proposed building will have five floors with 11 units per floor. Units will range from 2,000 to 2,900 square-feet. Units will have a north/south orientation, with the exception of the units on the western end of the building, which will have an east/west orientation. Units will be accessed by an open-air walkway along the southern side of the building. A clubroom, proposed on the western end of the second level, includes an open patio. The proposal includes a pool, including a shade trellis, on the western portion of the site. The request is being processed as a Residentiallnfill Project to permit attached dwellings within the HDR District due to setback reductions being requested, to the building, pavement, a dumpster staging area, and the pool deck. A corner of the pool deck and the deck at the shade trellis is proposed at a 13-foot rear setback. The pool deck and deck at the shade trellis has been designed with a symmetrical configuration, producing the minor triangular deck encroachments into the required 15-foot rear setback. The proposed southeast corner of the building is located at an 11.5-foot front setback, however, the majority of the building and pavement is at a 15-foot front setback. The dumpster staging area is proposed at a 12-foot front setback. The property is irregularly shaped due to the cul-de-sac "bulb" on the west end Community Development 2004-05-18 12 . . . and the vacated Dory Passage that jogs northward 20 feet. To minimize the distance trash dumpsters must be moved to the trash disposal truck but still respect a utility easement at the southeast corner of the site, the dumpster staging area has been located at a 12-foot front setback. To design the building to respect the shorter north/south lot dimension on the west end due to the cul-de-sac, while providing some building symmetry, the property jog due to the vacated Dory Passage, produced an 11.5-foot front building setback on the east end. The rear setback requirement is 15 feet, however, the Building Code requires an 18-foot setback from seawalls. To avoid a variance to the Building Code setback to the seawall, the building has been moved slightly forward, producing the front setback reductions requested. Existing setbacks to buildings and pavement along Windward Passage are irregular, with some buildings and pavement at a zero setback. The Island Yacht Club to the west at the terminus of Windward Passage has pavement at zero setback (front and side). The townhome buildings to the south are approximately 20 feet from the front property line, but with individual driveways providing for parking that backs into the right-of-way. A boat repair business at 241 Windward Passage has a zero-foot front setback to building and pavement. Offices at 251 Windward Passage also are at a zero-foot front setback to building. Pavement for the Villages on Island Estates is at a front setback of approximately eight feet. The applicant has not shown any proposed signage at this time, as they have not yet determined the style, location or size of signage desired. Future signage will need to meet Code provisions for multi-family developments. All requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code will need to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees need to be paid. The redevelopment of this site, with enhanced landscape improvements, will improve the appearance of this site and the surrounding area. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Residentiallnfill Project criteria (Section 2-504.F) have been met. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 23, 2003, and April 1, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development approval to permit 55 attached dwellings in the High Density Residential District with reductions to the front (south) setback along Windward Passage from 25 to 11.5 feet (to building), from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement) and from 25 to 12 feet (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the rear setback from 15 to 13 feet (to pool deck) and an increase to building height from 30 to 60 feet (to roof deck), as a Residentiallnfill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-504.F (retaining the existing floating docks for sole use by the property owners) for the site at 202 Windward Passage, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residentiallnfill Project per Section 2-504.F. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Community Development 2004-05-18 13 . . . Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That boats moored at the existing floating and future docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permit; 4. That payment of Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of the building permit; 5. That a four-foot high landscaped, solid fence or wall to screen parking be shown on the site plan along the east and northern portion of the parking area prior to the issuance of any permits; and 6. That the applicant, Windward Passage Condominiums, LLC, has entered into an agreement with The Village on Island Estates Condominium Association, Inc. ("Association"), in which the applicant has committed to certain matters that will ameliorate some of the impacts of the proposed development on its neighbors. Accordingly, this approval is personal to the applicant. Chair Hooper said while the December 1, 2003, CDB meeting minutes indicate he had declared a conflict of interest on the rezoning for this case, the Assistant City Attorney has informed him that he does not need to recuse himself. Senior Planner Wayne Wells stated staff had received a letter of opposition as well as two letters of no objection to this application from The Pools at Windward Passage and the Villages on Island Estates. In response to a question, Mr. Wells said in the right-of-way of Windward Passage, it is proposed that eight parking spaces will be metered for public use. This project also would provide parking for the adjacent municipal park, which has no on-site parking. He did not know if existing parking on the west end of the High and Dry marina would be retained or lost. Gerald Figurski, representative, said the developer had spent significant time in terms of project design, and meetings with staff and residents. He said this project is acceptable to neighbors and would benefit the community. He said the developer is proposing a beautiful building with significant vistas on the east, and an 81-foot setback, which includes a 14-foot landscaping buffer where only 10 feet is required. The west setback is 48 feet of setback and the set back in the center of the pie-shaped property is 105 feet. He said there would be 2.04 parking spaces per unit, which is more than the required 1.5 spaces required by Code. He was impressed with the developer's work with area neighbors. Mr. Figurski said an agreement has been entered into between the developer and Windward Passage Condominiums, LLC. The intent of the agreement is to ensure the proposed plan will be built. He distributed a handout requesting the addition of two conditions: 1) The applicant, Windward Passage Condominiums, LLC, has entered into an agreement with The Village on Island Estates Condominium Association, Inc. ("Association"), in which the applicant has committed to certain matters that will ameliorate some of the impacts of the proposed development on its neighbors. Accordingly, this approval is personal to the applicant, and may not be utilized in any manner by any other entity without such entity either (1) assuming and performing the applicant's obligations under such agreement, (2) the written consent of the Association, or (3) a new hearing before the Community Development Board, and Community Development 2004-05-18 14 . 2) Because of (1) the unique location of the proposed development at the end of a finger, adjacent to an existing marina, and the nature of other properties in the area, and (2) the agreement between the applicant and the association described above, the height and setbacks allowed for the proposed development does not set a precedent for any future development south of Windward Passage and west of Island Way. Mr. Figurski said part of the agreement requires the applicant request the COB to consider these two conditions. Regarding a previous parking question, Mr. Figurski said of 15 spaces on the front of the property, eight will remain as City spaces. The Yacht Club also has parking. Some parking spaces are used by High and Dry marina patrons. The project will feature 112 parking spaces, including four handicapped spaces. In response to a question, Mr. Figurski said the two adjoining condominium complexes have endorsed this project. Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani expressed concern the first proposed condition "... this approval is personal to the applicant, and may not be utilized in any manner by any other entity..." appears to prevent another entity from assuming the site plan rights and obligations. Mr. Figurski said the two proposed conditions state other applicants have to assume and perform obligations proposed today if they were to develop the property with the same project. . Tim Johnson, representative for the Villages on Island Estates Condominium Association, said the Association does not oppose this application. As part of the agreement, the developer requests adding the two conditions so that another applicant would have to assume the agreement in place with the applicant, or obtain the Villages on Island Estates Condominium Association's written consent. Otherwise, the new applicants would have to come back to the COB for approval. He said if anyone else comes forward with a project for this property without that agreement, the Villages on Island Estates Condominium Association would object. He said the second condition relates to the uniqueness of the property. The developer and the Villages on Island Estates Condominium Association are requesting that future projects on that street be evaluated on their own merits. . Discussion ensued. Ms. Tarapani expressed concern that as the City is not a party to the private agreement between the developer and the property owners, that the applicant is trying to insert the City into the agreement and eliminate the developer's right to sell the project to someone else. Mr. Johnson said the condition indicates the developer could sell the project to someone who would assume this agreement. Ms. Tarapani reiterated that the condition requires the City to enforce a private agreement. Staff always considers an area's character, etc. when a project is submitted. Mr. Johnson said the second condition is important, as it addresses potential development south of Windward Passage that may claim this project established a precedent. He said if the applicant is asking that these conditions be imposed and if it does not hurt the City, they should be added. He said the City should do all it can to encourage resolution of these types of land use matters between neighbors. Ms. Tarapani said the second condition clearly would adversely affect the City, as it would restrain staff and the COB from normal consideration of future projects. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said the COB has legal authority to impose stricter requirements than listed in the Code. The City must abide by any condition imposed by the COB. She said the second condition would eliminate staff's ability to fully consider future projects and impede on the authority granted by Code to the COB. It was remarked that the City does not know anything about the private agreement between the developer and property owner. Community Development 2004-05-18 15 . . . Mr. Johnson suggested revising the first condition by adding to the end: "... or (3) a new hearing before the Community Development Board, or (4) requires only Level One minimum or Flexible Standard approval." Ms. Tarapani encouraged the COB to decide if the private agreement is so important to the City's interest and the site plan that these conditions are necessary. The COB can impose stricter conditions. She said the City should not be required to enforce a private agreement between two parties. Mr. Johnson said this is a private matter and reflects a more restrictive condition the applicant wants. In response to a question, Mr. Johnson said the Pools at Windward Passage Condominiums never have been in support of this project; they are not opposed to it. In response to a question, Ms. Dougall-Sides said if the COB agrees to the first condition, the parties might be willing to furnish a copy of the private agreement to staff for informational purposes only. She suggested rewriting the language in the second condition. It was remarked that the COB does not wish to set precedents for future applicants. Ms. Tarapani said the character of a project affects staff's recommendations. Each case is performance-based. COB approval or denial of this case will help establish the area's character as redevelopment occurs. Mr. Johnson said the Windward Passage Condominium Association does not like the project's height. Mr. Wells said the High and Dry marina is 48 feet high from grade. Mr. Figurski suggested adding language to the second condition that "No intent is included in this paragraph, to otherwise interfere with the perogatives of the City or the COB." Ms. Tarapani said that change would not resolve her concerns. It was remarked the building is 440 feet long, with 320 feet paralleling Windward Passage, and features a building with no break in the front design. Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering, said the applicant has met with staff many times. The building features many undulations. Walt Chancey, architect, said he specializes in multi-family condominium projects. Many design renditions were considered. He said setbacks were incorporated into the fac;:ade design. Towers will break up the length of the building. In response to a question, Mr. Chancey said 200 feet of the project parallels Windward Passage. Mr. Figurski said the applicant would provide staff with a copy of the private agreement between the developer and the applicant. Ms. Tarapani said staff had not seen the private agreement or the two proposed conditions before today. She opposed their approval. Discussion ensued. It was remarked that the applicant's proposed conditions would force the City to enforce a private agreement. Mr. Johnson disagreed. He said this agreement resolves a dispute with respect to submerged lands. Ms. Tarapani said that dispute is a private matter and is not the City's concern. Mr. Johnson said Windward Passage is not objecting to this plan because of the proposed conditions. Ms. Dougall-Sides said the first condition requires a new developer to assume the plan and requires the City to enforce that requirement. Mr. Johnson suggested adding language: "Nothing in this condition obligates the City to enforce this agreement." Ms. Tarapani said the City does not get involved with ownership patterns or questions regarding who develops a site as long as what is built is what was approved by the COB. Mr. Johnson said if 200 Windward Passage residents objected to a project at a COB meeting, the City would consider those objections. Community Development 2004-05-18 16 . One person spoke in support of the application. Six persons spoke in opposition. Mr. Wells said he checked with the Engineering Department, and reported the eight parking spaces mentioned earlier that are being proposed in the right-of-way of Windward Passage for use by the public would not be metered spaces. The staff report references property to the west being zoned Commercial District as a marina. That wet marina is not a commercial marina. Mr. Figurski said the applicant suggests this project is an improvement over the flat face of the marina. Fifteen parking spaces are directly adjacent to this property on the street, and only eight will remain. The 15 existing spaces do not conform to Code in terms of their depth. A traffic study done when the property was rezoned, reported this project's impact would be positive. The Yacht Club operated as a commercial property until 1974. Mr. Figurski said while 130 feet is permitted, the applicant's project is only 60 feet in height. He said the applicant did his best to provide vistas around two sides of the property. The current site has inadequate parking. The current building covers the pavement, and has noise issues, fuel smells, etc. He said this project provides increased setbacks, on-site parking, on-site retention, landscaping, and is a residential use. Mr. Figurski said the project's 55 units and 60-foot height would be a significant improvement to the property's current condition. John Carey, partner, said he managed the High and Dry marina from 1974 to 1990. He said the street parking is in an easement. He said in 1975, the City wanted to make the parking area a grassy area, however, the marina wanted to keep the parking area. . In response to a question, Mr. Wells said the diagonal parking is in the City right-of-way. The applicant proposes to replace the diagonal parking with parallel parking. It was remarked that the developer is not gaining any of that land. A public sidewalk also is planned. In response to a question, Mr. Figurski said the agreement between the developer and property owner requires his client to request that the CDS adopt the two conditions, realizing the request may not be granted. He said the property would be developed without the two additional conditions. It was remarked it is a shame the City will lose a valuable boating asset, however the owner has the right to develop the property. It was felt the proposed project would be an asset. It was remarked a large number of people use the marina. This project will replace 300 boat owners with 55 residents who may not live there full-time. Changes to the first proposed condition were proposed to read: ".. .Accordingly, this approval is personal to the applicant." with the remainder of language thereafter deleted. It was agreed to refer to the first condition being proposed by the applicant as Condition #6, and the second condition as Condition #7. . In response to a question, Mr. Johnson said the Villages on Island Estates would not object to the changes suggested to Condition #6. It was felt Condition #7 is not necessary. Concern was expressed the bulk of the proposed project is out of character with the neighborhood. It was remarked the City Council discussed heights in this district and the applicant is conforming to Council desires by extending the project's setbacks. The four additional feet in height being proposed is still less than the maximum height allowed in this Community Development 2004-05-18 17 . . . zoning district. This property is surrounded by a mix of heights. It was felt this proposal is an improvement over the current use. Member Doran moved to approve Item #F1, Case FLD2003-11 059 for 202 Windward Passage, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report, plus Condition #6 as revised to read: "That the applicant, Windward Passage Condominiums, LLC, has entered into an agreement with The Village on Island Estates Condominium Association, Inc. ("Association"), in which the applicant has committed to certain matters that will ameliorate some of the impacts of the proposed development on its neighbors. Accordingly, this approval is personal to the applicant." The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. G. DIRECTOR'S ITEM: Timeframe for review of FLD2003-09050 - 1925 Edqewater Drive Ms. Leslie Dougall-Sides said Member Dennehy had left the meeting and there was no longer a quorum. She said the applicant had requested this item not be continued to July. She stated all Board action requires a quorum. She said citizens at the last meeting who were granted party status must be contacted if a new date is scheduled for this case. Ms. Tarapani did not anticipate a heavy agenda in June. It was remarked the Board tries to be sensitive to applicant timeframes. Ms. Tarapani reported continued items are re-noticed. The applicant originally had requested the case be continued to July. Staff will contact persons granted party status, and if there are no objections, the case can be rescheduled for June. Consensus was for staff to contact persons granted party status at last month's meeting, and if there are no objections, the case will be heard on June 15, 2004. It was requested staff provide the dates and times that C-View broadcasts CDB meetings. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:41 p.m. ~~~ Community Development Board Attest: 01 ffftd~mtJ:J/0 Board Reporter Community Development 2004-05-18 18 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Mav 18~ 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. address case number 202 Windward Passage / yes FLD2003-11059 no 409 Harnden Drive FLD2004-0 I 003 / l/ yes no 2551 Gulf to Bay Blvd \ /' yes - FLD2004-020 14 no 193 and 197 Elizabeth Ave / ANX2004-02003 no yes 2950161en Oak Ave \J ~ yes LUZ2004-03003 no yes ANX2004-03004 LUZ2004-03002 vi no 2025 N Highland Ave /, ,/" , Signature: ('----' \ applicant Windward Passage Condominiums Scott 0 Barrows Hardees Lease Partners Jeanne Bridges City of Clearwater Leonard and Mary Chetkin .I ;' L//1t/o4- 1/ I ' ; < Date: S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIAgendas DRC & CDBICDBI2004\05 May 18. 2004\CDB property investigation check list 051804,doco/l COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Mav 18" 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. address case number 202 Windward Passage FLD2003-11059 *yes no 409 Harnden Drive FLD2004-0 1 003 +yes no 2551 Gulf to Bay Blvd FLD2004-020 14 ~es no 193 and 197 Elizabeth Ave ANX2004-02003 yes -+--no 2950 Glen Oak Ave ,...I LUZ2004-03003 yes ~no 2025 N Highland Ave ANX2004-03004 LUZ2004-03002 yes -+no Sib~~ ~ ~ - =:-'\ applicant Windward Passage Condominiums Scott 0 Barrows Hardees Lease Partners Jeanne Bridges City of Clearwater Leonard and Mary Chetkin Date: S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB\2004\05 May J 8. 2004\CDB property investigation check list 05 J 804.docof 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Mav 18'1 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. address case number 207dward Passage FLD2003-11 059 yes no 409 ~den Drive FLD2004-0 1 003 LI' yes no 25rfto Bay Blvd FLD2004-02014 yes no 19:1 197 Elizabeth Ave ANX2004-02003 29J:ak Ave n:UZ2004_03003 yes no 202~~hland Ave ANX2004-03004 V LUZ2004-03002 yes no Signature: applicant Windward Passage Condominiums Scott 0 Barrows Hardees Lease Partners Jeanne Bridges City of Clearwater Leonard and Mary Chetkin Date: ~01 S:\Planning DepartmentlC D B\Agendas DRC & CDBICDB\2004\05 May 18, 20041CDB property investigation check list 05l804.docoj I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Mav 18'12004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. address case number 202 Windward Passage FLD2003-11059 /~o yes 409 H~den Drive . FLD2004-0 1 003 V, ~ yes no 2551 Gulf to Bay Blvd FLD2004-02014 yes / no 193 and 197 Elizabeth Ave ANX2004-02003 t/ yes no 2950 Glen Oak Ave yes J/ LUZ2004-03003 no 2025 N Highland Ave ANX2004-03004 / LUZ2004-03002 / ~no yes Signature' applicant Windward Passage Condominiums Scott 0 Barrows Hardees Lease Partners Jeanne Bridges City of Clearwater Leonard and Mary Chetkin Date: ...;:;;) 1D 'I I S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB\2004\05 May 18, 20041CDB property investigation check list 051804.docoj 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Mav 18~ 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. address case number 202 Windward Passage FLD2003-11059 ---- yes no 409 Harnden Drive FLD2004-0 I 003 ~yes no 2551 Gulfto Bay Blvd FLD2004-020 14 I _____ yes no 193 and 197 Elizabeth Ave ANX2004-02003 ~ yes no 2950 Glen Oak Ave ~ yes LUZ2004-03003 no 2025 N Highland Ave ANX2004-03004 LUZ2004-03002 ~es no SiW1atureC~~ applicant Windward Passage Condominiums Scott 0 Barrows Hardees Lease Partners Jeanne Bridges City of Clearwater Leonard and Mary Chetkin Date Q\\~\<J~ S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlAgendas DRC & CDBICDB\2004\05 May 18, 2004\CDB property investigation check list 051804.docoj I