Loading...
02/17/2004 . . . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER February 17, 2004 Present: Ed Hooper John Doran Shirley Moran Edward Mazur, Jr. Alex Plisko Kathy Milam Daniel Dennehy Chair Vice Chair Board Member Board Member - arrived 2:11 p.m. Board Member Board Member Acting Board Member Absent: David Gildersleeve Board Member Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides Lisa Fierce Frank Gerlock Brenda Moses Assistant City Attorney Assistant Planning Director Development Review Manager Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: January 20,2004 Member Doran moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 20, 2004, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE: (Item 1) 1. Case: FLD2003-11 058 - 161 Brightwater Drive Owner/Applicant: Paul Camp Lane (Clearwater Townhomes, Inc., 7087 Grand National Drive, Suite 100, Orlando, FL 32819; phone: 407-316-0343; fax: 407-316-0372). Representative: Bill Woods (Woods Consulting, Inc.; 322 Ridge Road, Palm Harbor, FL 34683; phone: 727-861-5747; fax: 727-786-7479; cell: 727-871-0084; email: billwoods@woodsconsultinq.orq). Location: 0.47 acres located on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 800 feet east of Hamden Drive. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the construction of five multi-use docks providing 10 slips for a 1 O-unit townhome, with each dock measuring 54 feet in length (25 percent of the waterway width) from seawall and 1,080 square feet of total decking for the five proposed docks, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Proposed Use: Five shared multi-use docks. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 446-5801; email: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner. Community Development 2004-02-17 1 . . . Member Doran moved to continue Case FLD2003-11058 for 161 Brightwater Drive. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting (Items 1 - 6): Pulled from Consent Agenda 1. Case: FLD2003-10055-2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd/511 S. Hercules Avenue Leve/ Two Application Owner/Applicant: Roma Square, Inc. Representative: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP, Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. (13630 58th Street North, Suite 110, Clearwater, FL 33760; phone: 727-524-1818; fax: 727-524-6090; email: perq o@qulfcoastconsultinqinc.com). Location: 1.98 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Hercules Avenue. Atlas Page: 298B. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from 25 to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25 to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10 to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Problematic use (check cashing). Neighborhood Association: Skycrest Association (Elizabeth France, 1629 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-442-5856; email: eaf5054@earthlink.net ). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. Member Mazur declared a conflict of interest. The 1.98-acre site is at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and South Hercules Avenue. The Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard corridor is highly developed commercially. Clearwater High School is to the west across South Hercules Avenue. A vacant parcel, zoned Office District, lies to the south across Rogers Street. The properties to the north and east are developed commercially with retail establishments. Community Development 2004-02-17 2 ~ . . The site currently is developed with a 22,692 square-foot shopping center, which includes a daycare center at 511 South Hercules Avenue (northeast corner of South Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street). A problematic use (R & W Pawn and Jewelry) has existed legally at this shopping center at 2007 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from at least July 1997. On November 29,2000, an Occupational License application was submitted to the City for Ace America Cash Express, also a problematic use, to locate at 2005 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The Occupational License has not been able to be issued, as this use requires Flexible Development approval by the COB (Community Development Board), including deviations to allow the problematic use to locate adjacent to residentially zoned property and to locate within 500 feet of another problematic use. Ace America Cash Express has operated at this location since 2000 without approval from the City, including a valid Occupational License. The site has very little landscaping along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, South Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street. There are three existing driveways on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and South Hercules Avenue and two driveways on Rogers Street. There is one freestanding sign for the shopping center at the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and South Hercules Avenue, one freestanding sign for the shopping center on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and one freestanding sign for the day care center on South Hercules Avenue. The proposal includes Ace America Cash Express buying out R & W Pawn and Jewelry and combining the two tenant spaces to be used solely by Ace America Cash Express. In doing such, the end effect of this proposal will be to have only one, legal problematic use at this location. The applicant proposes to buyout the lease, apply for City building permits for interior renovations and for site improvements, and obtain required FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation) access permits within six months of COB approval. Failure to accomplish all three items within this timeframe will cause this Flexible Development approval by the COB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again. Failure by the applicant to diligently and timely pursue the issuance of, and completion of, required building permits for the purpose of issuing an Occupational License for Ace America Cash Express will be grounds to deem the Flexible Development approval null and void and also cause enforcement action to be initiated again. The applicant proposes to modify or eliminate driveways on all three abutting streets. Driveways on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard will be reduced from three to one, retaining the easternmost driveway. Cross access with the adjacent property to the east close to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard will be retained. The driveway for the shopping center on South Hercules Avenue will be reduced in width from approximately 39 to 24 feet. The traffic flow for driveways associated with the daycare center portion of this site on South Hercules Avenue will be restricted and channelized through signage (do not enter signage). A reduction of the number of driveways on South Hercules Avenue associated with the daycare center is not possible due to the existing porte-cochere and the height of the daycare center vans. The driveway on Rogers Street for the daycare center will remain. There presently is only one driveway for the parking area in the rear of the shopping center off Rogers Street, whereas modification of this parking area will require two driveways, but in a more efficient design and traffic flow. The easternmost driveway on Rogers Street will provide access to a new double dumpster enclosure (which will need to be consistent in materials and color as the principal building). Parking will be brought up to current Code design requirements, including the insertion of interior landscape islands to break up the number of parking spaces in a row and the relocation and provision of handicap parking with required walk aisles and access to public sidewalks within the Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and South Hercules Avenue rights-of-way. Due to the position of the Community Development 2004-02-17 3 . . . existing shopping center building and parking design requirements, the front setback along Gulf- to-Bay Boulevard to the edge of existing pavement is proposed to be a minimum of 7.8 feet on the east side to 10.5 feet on the west end close to the intersection with South Hercules Avenue. Also due to the position of the existing shopping center building in relation to South Hercules Avenue, there is no opportunity to provide a landscape buffer along this portion of the site frontage (hence, the reason for a front setback reduction to zero feet [to existing pavement]). However, that portion in front of the daycare center will be landscaped (minimum 11 feet setback). The proposal includes a zero-foot front setback along Rogers Street to existing pavement only at the intersection of South Hercules Avenue and Rogers Street. These spaces are for the daycare center vans. Parking at the rear of the shopping center will be modified to provide a front setback along Rogers Street of 15 feet (to existing pavement). This rear parking area will be modified to provide landscape areas between the parking rows and a landscape area along the east property line of five feet in width. The proposal includes a parking reduction from the required 114 parking spaces (five spaces per 1,000 square feet) to 100 spaces (4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet). There are 90 existing parking spaces on site. The applicant has submitted a parking analysis that showed, at peak use, only 49 percent (44 parking spaces) of the existing 90 parking spaces were utilized. This proposal increases the amount of parking spaces from 90 to 100. Based on the parking analysis, adequate parking will be available. On-street parking on the south side of Rogers Street and on the east side of South Hercules Avenue also exists. The applicant proposes to significantly improve the appearance of this site by installing landscaping along the street frontages, where possible, and within the parking lot. Much like setback reductions (to existing pavement), the proposal includes reductions of required landscape buffers. The landscape buffer along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (north) is proposed to be reduced from 15 to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), the landscape buffer along South Hercules Avenue is proposed to be reduced from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement) and the landscape buffer along Rogers Street is proposed to be reduced from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement). The landscape buffer along the east property line also is proposed to be reduced from five feet to one foot (to existing building). The proposal includes a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five to zero feet, which is not possible due to the building location and parking lot design requirements. These reductions are what are possible, given existing site conditions, will be in harmony with the character of the surrounding area, and will not substantially impact the abutting properties. The criteria for problematic uses are more stringent than the criteria for other commercial uses to ensure that the businesses are consistent with the general purposes of the Community Development Code. This includes ensuring that the development will not have a negative impact on the value of surrounding properties, requiring that existing and future uses are attractive and well-maintained, minimizing conflicts between uses and enumerating density, area, width, depth, height, setback, coverage and like requirements for each district. The applicant is proposing to retain all three freestanding signs, basically in their existing nonconforming conditions. The two freestanding signs for the shopping center are generally similar in design (sign height, sign color and individual tenant message panels [white background with red lettering]). There are, however, only a few panels of a different color and/or lettering. The Code requires signs to be architecturally integrated into the design of the Community Development 2004-02-17 4 . . . building and/or site using similar and coordinated design and style features, materials and colors. The Code requires that in the event a building permit is required for the redevelopment of a principal use/structure, or a principal use/structure is vacant for a period of 180 days, signs on the parcel proposed for development shall be brought into compliance. A building permit will be required for interior remodeling to combine the two tenant spaces for R & W Pawn and Ace America Cash Express. The Flexible Development criteria for problematic uses requires signage which has a height of greater than six feet as part of a comprehensive sign program. The existing signs for the shopping center are approximately 18 feet tall. To be consistent with prior Flexible Development approval for a problematic use at 1916 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (Case No. VAR1999-F2010, approved on August 17,1999), which required a six-foot high monument sign, the height of these shopping center signs should be reduced in height, and acceptable to the Planning Department, through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Additionally, these freestanding signs for the shopping center should have consistent sign message panels (background color and lettering color). It is noted that Ace America Cash Express has not been established legally and all changes made to signage are, therefore, not legal. This uniformity of signage has been applied to many other shopping center properties elsewhere in the City. To improve readability, addresses on the freestanding shopping center signs are proposed to read horizontally, rather than vertically. The freestanding sign for the daycare center should be included as part of the Comprehensive Sign Program. Attached signage also is proposed by the applicant to remain unaltered. All attached signs have individual lettering on a white background, with the exception of Beepers and Phones (2015 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard), the card shop (2019 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard) and Ace Cash America Express (2005 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard). Also, based on Section 6-104.A and Section 3-1806. B, those attached tenant signs that are not on a white background with individual lettering should be changed. Attached signage should be included as part of the Comprehensive Sign Program. Deviations to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially-zoned parcel and to locate a problematic use within a building that does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations are requested. The overall site touches at the southeast corner property zoned Medium High Density Residential District, which is developed with the Canterbury Oaks apartment complex. While this constitutes being contiguous, the actual tenant space is over 200 feet away from the apartment complex property and is oriented toward Gulf- to-Bay Boulevard, minimizing any negative impacts. The existing site and building do not meet current land development and building regulations. This shopping center has existed at this location for some time, being developed under previous, less stringent regulations. The expanded tenant space will be brought up to current building regulations as part of this proposal. The site will be brought into conformance with current land development regulations to the greatest extent possible. Requiring full compliance with current regulations would create an undue hardship on the property owner. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-704.C) have been met. An occupational license application for this use was reviewed by Zoning, which requires CDB approval prior to issuance. A letter stating such was sent to the business December 14, 2000. The occupational license application has been in the CRT / OCL hold folder since Community Development 2004-02-17 5 ,e . . December 14, 2000. While there was correspondence or phone calls during early 2001, numerous phone calls regarding this use were made during the latter half of 2002. A Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Flexible Development application was filed with the Planning Department on August 22, 2002, (FLD2002-08025). A letter of incompleteness, dated August 26, 2002, was sent identifying information necessary to make the application complete. This incomplete application was deemed withdrawn on December 26, 2002, when application material to make it complete was not submitted. A Notice to Appear was issued on October 13, 2003, to the store manager on the violation (CDC2002-01305). The subject FLD application was submitted on October 21,2003. Bob Hall of the Community Response Team spoke with Leah Letice from Johnson Blakely (461-1818) on November 13,2003. He informed her that this information (filing of this FLD application) is satisfactory for the City not issuing citations at this time. As long as the client does not withdraw the case or fail to bring the property into compliance, then the City will allow the processes to occur. However, once the processes stop toward compliance, the City would need to initiate enforcement again. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 4, 2003. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development approval (1) To permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard from 25 to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Hercules Avenue from 25 to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers Street from 25 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 25 to zero feet (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to required parking from five spaces per 1,000 square feet (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L, and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (north) from 15 to 7.8 feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Avenue (west) from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers Street (south) from 10 feet to one foot (to existing building) and from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from five feet to one foot (to existing building) and a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from five to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G for the site at 2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and 511 South Hercules Avenue, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913 and the Comprehensive Landscape Program per Section 3-1202.G; and 3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1) That the applicant (Ace America Cash Express) buyout the lease of R & W Pawn and Jewelry, apply for City building permits for interior renovations and for site improvements, and obtain required FOOT Access Permits by August 17, 2004. Failure to accomplish all three items within this timeframe shall cause this Flexible Development approval by the COB to be null and void and cause enforcement action to be initiated again. Failure by the applicant to diligently and timely pursue the issuance of, and completion of, required building permits for the purpose of issuing an Occupational License for Ace America Cash Express after completion of those improvements, shall be grounds to deem the Flexible Development approval null and void and also cause enforcement action to be initiated again; 2) That a Comprehensive Sign Program be Community Development 2004-02-17 6 . . . submitted by August 17, 2004. The Comprehensive Sign Program shall include both freestanding and attached signage. Shopping center freestanding signage shall be reduced to a height acceptable to the Planning Department, have consistent color, have consistent tenant message panels and individual lettering and have the site address revised to be read horizontally. The day care center freestanding sign height shall be acceptable to the Planning Department, be consistent in color as the shopping center freestanding signage and shall include the site address. Attached shopping center signage shall have a consistent color of background panels and individual lettering. All necessary sign permits shall be obtained by October 17, 2004, to effect changes approved under the Comprehensive Sign Program; and 3) That the double dumpster enclosure be consistent in materials and color as the principal building. Concern was expressed that this type of development is being located on a major artery in the City. Senior Planner Wayne Wells said as the property had already been developed, the most significant change is in the number of parking spaces. Although ten more spaces would be gained from what exists today, to meet setback requirements, half the total amount of parking spaces permitted would be lost. It was remarked that this redevelopment would result in improved landscaping on the site, two less ingress/egress points off Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, and more narrow ingress than exists now, and 10 additional parking spaces. In response to a question, Mr. Wells said the applicant has agreed to address signage. Ed Armstrong, representative, said if the application was denied none of the upgrades would occur. He said the applicant would pay for the improvements for the right to take over the pawnshop property. He did not believe that anyone on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard could meet the requirements of Code under the redevelopment mode. He complimented City staff for work with the applicant to agree to the conditions. Assistant Planning Director Lisa Fierce said the Community Response Team has indicated if the applicant works with staff, this case would probably not be presented to the MCEB (Municipal Code Enforcement Board). In response to a question, Mr. Armstrong said the applicant is willing to accept the three conditions as stated by staff. Member Doran moved to approve Consent Agenda Item E 1, Case FLD2003-10055 for 2001-2021 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard/511 S. Hercules Avenue with Bases of Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members Doran, Moran, Plisko, Acting Board Member Dennehy, and Chair Hooper voted "Aye"; Member Milam voted "Nay"; Member Mazur abstained. Motion carried. PuUed lfomConsentAgenda 2. Case: FLD2003-08036 - 935 Lakeview Road Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: Larry Dean (1856 Redcoat Lane, Clearwater, FL 33764; phone: 727-536- 7723; fax: 727-536-7723; cell: 727-692-4036; email: Idean4@tampabav.rr.com) Location: 0.11-acre located on the south side of Lakeview Road, approximately 100 feet west of Ewing Avenue. Atlas Page: 306A. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Community Development 2004-02-17 7 . . . Request: Flexible Development approval to permit an office with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 5,000 to 4,920 square feet, a reduction to the lot width from 50 to 49 feet, a reduction to the front (north) setback along Lakeview Road from 25 to four feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 to four feet (to pavement) and from 10 to five feet (to building), a reduction to the front (south) setback along Dempsey Street from 25 to 12 feet (to building) and reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 to two feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to four feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C and a reduction to the north landscape buffer along Lakeview Road from 10 to four feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from five to four feet and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from five to two feet, as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: 1,179 square-foot office. Neighborhood Association: None. Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner. Member Moran declared a conflict of interest. The 0.11-acre site is on the south side of Lakeview Road, approximately 100 feet west of Ewing Avenue. The parcel has two frontages, one along Lakeview Road and a second along Dempsey Street. It is comprised of lots five and six, block 1, of the "Lake Belleview Addition" plat. The parcel is in a strip of commercially zoned properties that divide Lakeview Road and Dempsey Street. It currently is vacant and undeveloped, with an existing concrete drive in the northeast corner. The applicant has proposed to construct a 1,179 square-foot building to serve as an office for his painting business. The office will provide space to store equipment and meet with potential clients. All work activities will take place at designated sites based on the clients' request. The proposed hours of operation will be from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The proposed site plan has one point of ingress / egress on Lakeview Road. This point of access will be a 24-foot driveway. The proposed office building will have a garage door on the north building fac;ade. This will allow the applicant to enter, store, and exit the parcel. A reduction in the amount of parking from four spaces per 1,000 square-feet to three spaces per 1,000 square-feet for the office use is proposed. Due to existing lot dimensions, a reduction in side setbacks to pavement is necessary for the parking to meet the City parking standards, while also maintaining a 24-foot drive aisle for the public to enter and exit the parking lot. The setback reduction requests are compatible with current Commercial zoning and the established neighboring setback patterns. The two lots comprising this parcel were platted in 1925. The lot dimensions of 1925 differ greatly from the current Code requirements of today and relief from the minimum development standards can be justified. The existing Commercial zoning for the property permits an office use. An office use within a Commercial District is a less intensive use than other types of uses that could be permitted within the district and is compatible with a residential neighborhood. The applicant has shown the adjacent property on the east to have a 1.5-foot setback from property line to building. The applicant has documented on the site plan that signage is to be attached to the fac;ade. It will be less than 4.5 square feet and will not be illuminated. The applicant will be notified that a separate permit is required for signage. There are no existing Code Enforcement violations. Community Development 2004-02-17 8 . . . The Development Review Committee reviewed the application on December 23, 2003. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development to permit a reduction in the minimum lot area from 5,000 to 4,920 square feet, a reduction in the lot width from 50 to 49 feet, a reduction in the front (north) setback along Lakeview Road from 25 to four feet (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 10 to four feet (to pavement) and five feet (to building), the front (south) setback along Dempsey Street from 25 to 12 feet (to building), and the side (west) setback from 10 to two feet (to pavement) and four feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and a reduction in the perimeter landscape buffer requirements from 10 to four feet along Lakeview Road, the side (east) setback from five to four feet, and the side (west) setback from five to two feet as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G., with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, per Section 2-704.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria, under Section 3-913; and 3) The improvements are compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1) That all future signage will require a permit for approval; 2) That no residential unit be included in building construction plans; 3) That one of the proposed oaks be removed due to inadequate spacing for growth on building construction plans; 4) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by COB; 5) That all traffic impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6) That no outdoor storage or display materials are permitted; 7) That the use be limited to a low traffic generating office with similar operational characteristics; and 8) That approval shall be tied to the application and supporting documents and any change thereto shall require review and approval by the COB. Planner Bryan Berry said this case was continued at the last meeting due to concerns about drainage on the eastern portion of the property. The drainage issue has been addressed by extending the western setback from one to four feet from the property line to the building. Larry Dean, applicant, said he also would remove the driveway on Dempsey Street. He said he realizes the site is rather "tight," however there are other businesses with similar configurations, and he is only trying to promote his business. Four persons spoke in opposition of the application. Ms. Fierce said the area is zoned commercial from Dempsey Street to Lakeview Road. Existing residential uses in that area are nonconforming. The office use is permitted. Lots under 5,000 square-feet require flexibility in terms of setbacks in order to function. When the applicant applies for an occupational license, it would only be approved for an office use. Ms. Fierce said the applicant has gone through the drainage and site triangle process and Engineering Department staff has ensured Mr. Dean would be in compliance with Code. Ms. Fierce said the plusses outweigh the minuses of the request. She said offices generally are occupied during daytime hours only. She suggested another condition be added stating there be no outdoor display or storage materials allowed. In response to a question, Ms. Fierce said this site most probably was zoned residential at one time and then converted to commercial zoning. Mr. Dean could not guarantee that he would stay in this location for a specific period of time. His intent is to run a business; not to make neighbors miserable. In response to a Community Development 2004-02-17 9 . . - question, Mr. Dean said he would accept the additional condition regarding prohibition of outdoor display or storage materials. He said he does not plan to perform work in the building. In response to a question, Ms. Fierce said today's request is for an office use. Staff would evaluate any future requests made and review them for compliance with the commercial district on an individual basis, and if necessary bring them before the COB. There are no specifics regarding operational use of this property. She suggested adding a condition that only low-traffic generating uses are permitted. Engineering Manager Scott Rice said staff feels the proposed drainage is adequate. A catch basin added to the parking lot in front of the building towards Lakeview Road would flow to the retention pond. It was remarked that the eight-inch pipe could easily become clogged due to the number of trees in the area. In response to a question, Mr. Rice said the site lines also are adequate. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides suggested another condition be added that "Approval shall be tied to the application and supporting documents and any change thereto shall require review and approval by the Community Development Board." In response to a question, Mr. Dean said he would accept the additional conditions proposed: 1) That no outdoor storage or display materials are permitted; 2) That the use be limited to similar office with low-traffic generating operating characteristics; and 3) That approval be tied to the application and supporting documents and any change thereto shall require review and approval by the Community Development Board. Member Doran moved to approve Consent Agenda Item E2, Case FLD2003-08036 for 935 Lakeview Road, with Bases of Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed, plus Conditions 6, 7, and 8. The motion was duly seconded. Members Doran, Plisko, Milam, Acting Board Member Dennehy, and Chair Hooper voted "Aye"; Member Mazur voted "Nay"; Member Moran abstained. Motion carried. Pulled ~om Consent Agenda 3. Case: ANX2003-11 029 - 1263 Keene Road South Level Three Application Owner/Applicant: Thomas Hughes & Ida F. Hughes (phone: 727-447-3136; fax: 727-447- 6956). Location: 0.23-acre located at the southeast corner of Keene Road South and Brentwood Drive, approximately 110 feet north of Lakeview Road. Atlas Page: 308A. Request: 1) Annexation of 0.23-acre of property and 0.13-acre of the abutting Brentwood Drive right-of-way to the City of Clearwater; 2) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low (RL) Category (County) to the Residential Low (RL) Category (City of Clearwater); and 3) Rezoning from the R3, Single Family Residential District (County) to the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (City of Clearwater). Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling. Neighborhood Association(s): Pride Civic Association (Robert J. Yunk, Chairman, 1375 Duncan Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756; phone: 727-539-3538; fax: 727-539-2368). Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner. The subject site is at 1263 Keene Road South, at the southeast corner of Keene Road South and Brentwood Drive, approximately 110 feet north of Lakeview Road. The applicant is requesting this annexation to receive City sewer service. The property is contiguous with the Community Development 2004-02-17 10 . . , existing City boundaries to the east; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It is proposed the abutting right-of-way not currently within the City limits also be annexed. The subject site is approximately 0.23-acre in area and is occupied by a single-family detached dwelling. It is proposed the property have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning category of LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential. The applicant receives water service from Pinellas County. Sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for this utility. The closest sewer line is in the Brentwood Drive right-of-way. The applicant has paid the assessment fee of $359.72, as well as the impact fee of $900 and is aware of any additional costs to extend City sewer service to the property. The proposed annexation and existing use are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Pinellas Planning Council's Countywide Plan Rules with regard to both the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies. The existing and proposed use of this site as a single-family detached dwelling is consistent with the LMDR zoning district. The proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of: 1) Annexation of property at 1263 Keene Road South and the abutting Brentwood Drive right-of- way; 2) The Residential Low (RL) category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) The LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. One person spoke in opposition of the application. Planner Marc Mariano said the applicants do not want to develop the property. They want to receive sanitary sewer service from the City. The person in opposition understood the request. Member Mazur moved to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Item E3, Case ANX2003-11 029 for 1263 Keene Road South. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 4. Case: ANX2003-11 030 - 1830 Beverly Circle Level Three Application Owner/Applicant: Jennifer Allen Neal (phone: 727-667-8116). Location: 0.25-acre located on the north side of Beverly Circle, approximately 600 feet north of Lakeview Road and 450 east of Keene Road South. Atlas Page: 308A. Request: 1) Annexation of 0.25-acre to the City of Clearwater; 2) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low (RL) Category (County) to the Residential Low (RL) Category (City of Clearwater); and 3) Rezoning from the R3, Single Family Residential District (County) to the LOR, Low Density Residential District (City of Clearwater). Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling. Neighborhood Association(s): Pride Civic Association (Robert J. Yunk, Chairman, 1375 Duncan Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756; phone: 727-539-3538; fax: 727-539-2368). Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner. Community Development 2004-02-17 11 . . . , The subject property is at 1830 Beverly Circle, on the north side of Beverly Circle, approximately 600 feet north of Lakeview Road and 450 feet east of Keene Road South. The applicant is requesting this annexation to receive City sewer and solid waste service. The property is not contiguous to existing City boundaries, however, it is in an enclave surrounded by City property on all sides and is within the borders of the City's planning area; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Pinellas County Ordnance 00-63 with regard to voluntary annexation. The site is approximately 0.25-acre in area and is occupied by a single- family detached dwelling. It is proposed the property have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning category of LOR, Low Density Residential. The applicant receives water service from Pinellas County. Sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for this utility. The closest sewer line is in the adjacent Beverly Circle right-of-way. The applicant is aware of the assessment fee and the impact fee payments required for sewer connection, as well as any additional costs to extend City sewer service to the property. The proposed annexation and existing use are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Pinellas Planning Council's Countywide Plan Rules with regard to both the Future Land Use Map and the goals and policies. The existing and proposed use of this site as a single-family detached dwelling is consistent with the LOR zoning district. The proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of: 1) Annexation of property located at 1830 Beverly Circle; 2) Residential Low (RL) category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) LOR, Low Density Residential zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. AND 5. Case: ANX2003-11031 -180 Pinewood Avenue Leve/ Three Application Owner/Applicant: Alfonso Tundidor (phone: 727-724-8608; fax: 727-724-8605). Location: 0.16-acre located on the west side of Pinewood Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Drew Street. Atlas Page: 290A. Request: 1) Annexation of 0.16-acre to the City of Clearwater; 2) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Urban (RU) Category (County) to the Residential Urban (RU) Category (City of Clearwater); and 3) Rezoning from the R3, Single Family Residential District (County) to the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District (City of Clearwater). Proposed Use: Single-family dwelling. Neighborhood Association(s): None. Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner. The 0.16-acre property is at 180 Pinewood Avenue, on the west side of Pinewood Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Drew Street. The applicant is requesting this annexation to receive City sanitary sewer service, and develop the site with a single-family detached dwelling. The property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the east; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It is proposed the property have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Urban (RU) and a zoning category of LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential. Community Development 2004-02-17 12 . . , Sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for this utility. Water service will, however, be provided by Pinellas County. The closest sewer line is located in the adjacent Pinewood Avenue right-of-way. The applicant is aware of the assessment impact fee payments required for sewer connection, as well as the additional costs to extend City sewer service to the property. The proposed annexation and proposed use are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan with regard to both the Future Land Use Map as well as the goals and policies. The proposed use of this site as a single-family detached dwelling is consistent with the LMDR zoning district. Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of: 1) Annexation of the property at 180 Pinewood Avenue; 2) Residential Urban (RU) category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. AND 6. Case: LUZ2003-11012 -1283 Lakeview Road Leve/ Three Application Owner/Applicant: Suncoast Renovations, Incorporated. Representative: John Bujalski, President, Suncoast Renovations, Incorporated (1650 Fox Road, Clearwater, Florida 33764; phone: 727-586-4700; fax: 727-581-9578). Location: 0.75-acre located on the south side of Lakeview Road, approximately 790 feet east of Missouri Avenue. Atlas Page: 308A. Request: 1) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential/Office General (R/OG) Classification to the Residential Urban (RU) Classification, and 2) Rezoning from the 0, Office District to the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Proposed Use: Detached dwellings. Neighborhood Association(s): None. Land Use Plan Amendment Category: Small Scale Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner. This Future Land Use Plan amendment and rezoning application involves three vacant parcels of land, approximately 0.74-acre in area. The site has a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential/Office General (R/OG), as well as a zoning classification of the 0, Office District. The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of this site to the Residential Urban (RU) category and to rezone it to the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District to allow the development of five detached dwellings on the property. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the acreage and density involved in this plan amendment, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required. An amendment to the Future Land Use Plan from the Residential/Office General (R/OG) category the Residential Urban (RU) category and a rezoning from the 0, Office District to the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District for the subject property is requested in order to Community Development 2004-02-17 13 . . . develop five detached dwellings on the site. The site is surrounded by a mobile home park, single-family dwellings and a retail use to the north, offices to the west and single-family dwellings to the east and south. The proposed Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan classification and LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential zoning district are consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. The Planning Department recommends approval of: 1) Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation for 1283 Lakeview Road from the Residential/Office General (R/OG) to the Residential Urban (RU) category, and 2) Amend the zoning district designation for 1283 Lakeview Road from the 0, Office District to the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District. Member Doran moved to recommend approval of Consent Agenda Items E4, Case ANX2003-11030 for 1830 Beverly Circle, E5, Case ANX2003-11031 for 180 Pinewood Avenue, and E6, Case LUZ2003-11012 for 1283 Lakeview Road. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. F. LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS: (Item 1) 1. Case: LUZ2003-11013 - 2155 Montclair Road Owner/Applicant: Beckett Lake Lodge, a Florida Limited Partnership. Representative: Roger A. Larson, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. (P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, Florida 33757-1368; phone: 727-461-1818). Location: 5.95-acres located on the south side of Montclair Road, approximately 1,000 feet west of Belcher Road. Atlas Page: 253B. Request: Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Urban (RU) Classification to the Residential Low Medium (RLM) Classification. Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing assisted living facility. Neighborhood Associations: Villas of Lake Arbor Homeowners Association, Incorporated (Barbara Matthews, Community Association Manager, 1700 McMullen-Booth Road, Suite C-3, Clearwater, Florida 33759; phone: 727-726-7494; fax: 727-726-2443); On Top of the World Homeowners Association (Ken Colen, President, 8700 Southwest 99th Street, Ocala, Florida 34481; phone: 904-854-0805). Land Use Plan Amendment Category: Small Scale Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner. Member Moran declared a conflict of interest. The Future Land Use Plan amendment application involves a 5.91-acre portion of one parcel of land, which is approximately 1 0.1-acres in its entirety, and is occupied by an assisted living facility containing 130 beds. The remaining 4.19 acres of the parcel is not included in this application and is designated Preservation (O.72-acre) and WaterlDrainage Overlay (3.47 acres). The applicant is proposing to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of this property from the Residential Urban (RU) category to the Residential Low Medium (RLM) category in order to receive an increase in density and permit the construction of a new assisted living facility housing up to 45 new beds. No change is requested to the current zoning Community Development 2004-02-17 14 . . . classification, which will remain MDR, Medium Density Residential, and it is consistent with both the existing and proposed Future Land Use Plan Classification. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to approval by the PPC (Pinellas Planning Council) and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the acreage involved in this plan amendment, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required. An amendment to the Future Land Use Plan from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Low Medium (RLM) for the subject property is being requested to allow the expansion of an assisted living facility. The neighborhood is surrounded by single-family residential dwellings to the south, east and west, as well as outdoor retail sales and service to the east; and multi-family residential dwellings to the north. The proposed Residential Low Medium Future Land Use Plan classification is consistent with the existing MDR, Medium Density Residential zoning district and with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. The Planning Department recommends approval of amending the Future Land Use Plan designation of 2551 Montclair Road from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Low Medium (RLM). In response to a question, Mr. Mariano said the PPC calculates 70 trips per day per acre for residential urban zoning. The proposed land use plan classification of Residential Low Medium generates 63 trips per day per acre. It was remarked that historically, Residential Low Medium zoning has been used for mobile home parks. Tim Johnson, representative, said this property already is developed with a 124-bed ACLF (Adult Congregate Living Facility). There are 60 Alzheimer beds, which always are full. People are turned away. A market study commissioned by the developer and owner of the property indicates that current market demand for Alzheimer or memory-impaired patients in this area is 295 beds, and only 250 beds exist. The study also indicates the need would increase to 395 beds within four years. This request is to increase the density onsite by increasing the ability to add 45 beds. When originally built, only 124 of 144 beds were constructed. Mr. Johnson referred to a drawing showing the new building would be built between the nursery and the existing building. He said the Alzheimer facility would not generate more trips. One person spoke in favor of and two persons spoke in opposition to the application. Mr. Mariano said when the PPC changed the calculation of the number of trips per day per acre originally done in 1995, the changes were adopted by Clearwater and the County. That change allowed Beckett Lake to increase density. Mr. Johnson said nearby residents would not be able to see the proposed building. He said there is adequate water and sewer to accommodate the new building and there are no transportation issues involved. He said it is not economically feasible to build a 20-bed Alzheimer facility. He noted that the Top of the World Condominiums are immediately across the street from residences. Community Development 2004-02-17 15 . . . Discussion ensued in response to a statement regarding the number of units per acre in this area. Ms. Fierce said 7.5 units per acre are permitted in Beckett Lake. Member Mazur moved to recommend approval of Item F1, Case LUZ2003-11 013 for 2155 Montclair Road. The motion was duly seconded. Members Doran, Plisko, Mazur, Milam, Acting Board Member Dennehy, and Chair Hooper voted "Aye." Member Moran abstained. Motion carried. G. DIRECTOR'S ITEM: 1. Morton Plant Master Plan Amendments Development Review Manager Frank Gerlock referenced Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani's November 25, 2003, letter to Emil C. Marquardt, Jr., of MacFarlane Ferguson & McMullen indicating that an agreement has been reached between Morton Plant Hospital and the City regarding the Morton Plant Master Plan for 300 Pinellas Street. Morton Plant Hospital administration has agreed that staff can make administrative changes to the plan to expedite the project without submission to the CDB. Mark Marquardt, representative for Morton Plant Hospital, said he agreed to the amendments to the Master Plan as submitted by staff. It was suggested that Item #5 of the amendments submitted read "Reduction of required parking for the entire hospital campus, as shown on the approved Master Plan. Changes to alter the number of spaces in one or more parking areas that result in no net overall campus reduction or a reduction of 1 % in the total campus spaces will not require CDB or staff approval." Staff and Mr. Marquardt both agreed to the suggestion. Member Doran moved to approve the amendments to the Morton Plant Master Plan, including the change to Item #5 as indicated above. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Other Ms. Fierce reported her Administrative Analyst recently had retired. Planner Marc Mariano also is leaving the department. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:14 p.m. -1:lA~) Community Development Board Community Development 2004-02-17 16 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Februarv 17~ 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. * FLD2003-1 0055 _ 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard/511 South Hercules A venue, Roma Square, Inc. -- yes no * FLD2003-08036 - 935 Lakeview Road - Larry Dean ~ yes no * FLD2003-11058 - 161 Brightwater Drive - Paul Camp Lane yes ...---- no * LUZ2003-11013 - 2155 Montclair Road - Beckett Lake Lodge, a Florida Limited Partnership -- yes no * ANX2003-11 029 - 1263 Keene Road South - Thomas Hughes & Ida F. Hughes yes ~ no * ANX2003-11030 - 1830 Beverly Circle - Jennifer Allen Neal yes ~ no * ANX2003-11031 - 180 Pinewood Avenue - Alfonso Tundidor yes a.----- no * LUZ2003-11012 - 1283 Lakeview Road - Suncoast Renovations, Incorporated yes Signatur~ ~ L.- -no Date 2..\ t\\ ~~ S:\Planning Department\C D B\Agendas DRC & CDB\CDB\2004\02 February 17, 2004\CDB property investigation check list.doc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Februarv 17, 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. * FLD2003-10055 _ ,200 1-2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard/511 South Hercules Avenue, Roma Square, Inc. i 'J yes no * FLD2003-08036 - 935 Lakeview Road - Larry Dean J yes no * FLD2003-11 05)61 Brightwater Drive - Paul Camp Lane yes no . LUZ2003-110 17 2155 Montclair Road - Beckett Lake Lodge, a Florida Limited Partnership ,yes no . ANX2003-1IOj 1263 Keene Road South - Thomas Hughes & Ida F. Hughes yes no . ANX2003-11031830 Beverly Circle - Jennifer Allen Neal yes no I * ANX2003-11 O~ 80 Pinewoud Avenue - Alfonso Tundidor yes no * LUZ2003-11012 - }283 Lakeview Road - Suncoast Renovations, Incorporated rJ yes no Signature ~ Date 1 \ n, oi S,IPI",'" """,ro,,'\C 0 \,"d~'DRC & CDB\CDB\2004\02 "bro,,,, 17. 2004\CDB pmp'''' i"*~ti"..i", ,h~k li"d~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: Februarv 17, 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. * FLD2003-10055 _ 2001-2021 GU7Bay Boulevard/511 South Hercules Avenue, Roma Square, Ine. yes no * FLD2003-08036 - 935 Lakeview Ri- Larry Dean yes no . FLD2003-11 058 - 161 Brightwater 7 - Paul Camp Lane yes no , * LUZ2003-11 0 13 _ 2155 Montclair Rjd - Beckett Lake Lodge, a Florida Limited Partnership yes no * ANX2003-11029 - 1263 Keene R1 South - Thomas Hughes & Ida F. Hughes yes no * ANX2003-11030 - 1830 Beverly cile - Jennifer Allen Neal yes no * ANX2003-Il031 - 180 Pinewood Jvenue - Alfonso Tundidor yes no * LUZ2003-11012 - 1283 Lakevie:foad - Suncoast Renovations, Incorporated yes no Signature: ' ~ Date: ;;2..J/7 0 '1 S.IP"";,, DepM.m,,"C D BlAg, "" DRC & CDBICDBI2004102 P,bro'", 17. 2004ICDB propo", m"'ti"ti] :b~k ;".d~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 17'1 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. * FLD2003-10055 _ 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard/511 South Hercules Avenue, Roma Square, Inc. 'I... yes 'I no * FLD2003-08036 - 935 Lakeview Road - Larry Dean X yes no * FLD2003-11058 - 161 Brightwater Drive - Paul Camp Lane 1\ yes no * LUZ2003-11013 _ 2155 Montclair Road - Beckett Lake Lodge, a Florida Limited Partnership x... no yes * ANX2003-11029 - 1263 Keene Road South - Thomas Hughes & Ida F. Hughes yes ~ no * ANX2003-11030 - 1830 Beverly Circle - Jennifer Allen Neal yes ><- no * ANX2003-11031 - 180 Pinewood Avenue - Alfonso Tundidor yes )( no * LUZ2003-11012 - 1283 Lakeview Road - Suncoast Renovations, Incorporated yes ~ no Signature~~ 1 S:\Planning Department\C D B\Agendas DRC & CDB\CDB\2004\02 February 17, 2004\CDB property investigation check list.doc Date: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 17, 2004 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. * FLD2003-10055 _ 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Boulevard/511 South Hercules Avenue, Roma Square, Inc. yes ~no . FLD2003-08036 - 935y~keVie~:rry Dean . FLD2003-11 058 - 161 Brightwater ~ve - Paul Camp Lane yes no . LUZ2003-11013 _ 21::~ontC~n:eCkett Lake Lodge, a Florida Limited Partnership * ANX2003-11029 _ 1263 Keene Road South - Thomas Hughes & Ida F. Hughes yes ~no . ANX2003-11030 - 18:e: Beverly ~c1e -n:ennifer Allen Neal . ANX2003-11031 - 180 Pinewood ~nue - Alfonso Tundidor yes no * LUZ2003-11012 - 1283 Lakeview Road - Suncoast Renovations, Incorporated Signature' no Date: z.;1 7/0 j CDB\CDB\2004\02 February 17, 2004\CDB property investigation check list.doc