Loading...
02/15/2005 . . . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD . CITY OF CLEARWATER February 15, 2005 Present: David Gildersleeve Alex Plisko J. B. Johnson Thomas Coates Dana K. Tallman Nicholas C. Fritsch Daniel Dennehy Chair Vice-Chair Board Member Board Member Board Member Board Member Acting Board Member Absent: Kathy Milam Board Member Also Present: Gina Grimes Leslie Dougall-Sides Cyndi Tarapani Mark Parry Brenda Moses Attorney for the Board Assistant City Attorney Planning Director Acting Development Review Manager Board Reporter The Chair called the meeting to order at 1 :01 p.m. at City HaiL followed by the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: January 18, 2005 Member Plisko moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 18, 2005, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. D. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE (to March 15, 2005, meeting) (Item 1): 1. Case: FLD2004-1 0076rrOR2004-1 0014 - 12 Idlewiid Street Level Two Application Owner: Haddon House Inn, Inc. Applicant/Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446- 8036; email: nestech@mindsprinQ.com). Location: 0.462 acre on the north side of Idlewild Street, approximately 125 feet west of Mandalay Avenue. Atlas Page: 258A.. Zoning District: . Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 25 to 15 feet (to building) and from 25 to 4.2 feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 to eight feet from the Coastal Construction Control Line (to pool deck), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 to 5.9 feet (to building) and from 10 to five feet (to pool deck) and from 10 to 2 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 to 3.2 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 6 feet (to sidewalk), and an increase to height from 30 to 64 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 4.16 feet for Community Development 2005-02-15 1 . . . perimeter parapet (from roof deck) and an additional 15.83 feet for a rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), and change of use from Overnight Accommodations to Attached Dwellings as a Residentiallnfill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.F; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403 (TDR2004-10014). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (fourteen condominiums). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Beach Association: (Jay Keyes) 100 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-443-2168; Island Estates Civic Association (PO Box 3154, Clearwater, FL 33767); Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net). Presenter: Keyl L. Groff, Planner II. Member Dennehy moved to continue Item 01, Case FLD2004-1 0076rrDR2004-1 0014 for 12 Idlewild Street to March 15, 2005. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. E. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting (Items 1 - 9): 1. Item Pulled from Consent Agenda Case:' FLD2004-09065 - 105 Brightwater Drive Level Two Application Owner: La Fiesta Brightwater, LLC. Applicant/Representative: Robert Szasz, R & S Investments of Pinellas, LLC (1860 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-467-0730; fax: 727-467-0732; email: RBSzasz@aol.com). Location: 0.16 acre on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 100 feet east of Hamden Drive. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning District: Tourist (T). Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to lot area from 10,000 to 7,214 square-feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 to 60 feet and an increase to building height of an additional three feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 35-foot height) and to permit a building within the visibility triangles, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (three condominiums). Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Beach AssoCiation; (Jay Keyes, 100 Devon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-443-2168); Cleal'\'IIater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. Member Plisko requested this item be pulled from the Consent Agenda. The rectangular-shaped 0.16-acre site is on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 100 feet east of Hamden Drive, along a highly developed area within Clearwater beach and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which provides for the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes and timeshares between two and four stories above parking. Community Development 2005-02-15 2 . The site currently is developed with a one-story overnight accommodation building of nine units/rooms and is approximately 10 feet in height. The site has the appearance of one, undefined, driveway along most of the front property line (Brightwater Drive), where parking spaces straddle the property line (partially on-site and partially within the right-of-way) and "back out" into the right-of-way. The site also contains a dock and two boat slips, to be retained for resident and guest usage only and will not be sub-leased. All existing improvements (buildings, pavement, walkways and decks) will be removed as part of the site's redevelopment. The properties to the east, west and north have not yet been redeveloped. The property to the west currently is developed with a two-story overnight accommodation use, and there have been no redevelopment proposals for this site. The property to the north across Brightwater Drive currently is developed with overnight accommodation uses and there have been no redevelopment proposals for these sites. Property to the east currently is developed with a one- and two-story overnight accommodation use and there have been no redevelopment proposals for this site. Brightwater Drive, however, can be characterized as undergoing significant redevelopment into attached dwellings (townhomes and condominiums). . The proposal includes constructing a three-story (over ground level parking) residential condominium building; A total of four dwelling units are permitted for the subject property, . based on the maximum of 30 units per acre. The proposal is for three units (one unit per floor). The units will be 2,627 square-feet each (air-conditioned floor area). The proposal includes five parking spaces under the building (five parking spaces are required at 1.5 spaces per unit). Parking under the building will be open and accessible with no gates. The proposal meets all required setbacks (front of 15 feet, side of 10 feet and rear of 20 feet). The proposal includes a portion of the building within the sight visibility triangle, but is limited to one column on the west side of the driveway, which is acceptable from a traffic safety standpoint. The proposed building meets the 35-foot height standard (to roof deck). The request includes an increase to building height of an additional three feet for perimeter parapets (from the roof deck). This increased height for the perimeter parapets is to screen rooftop air conditioning and mechanical equipment. The proposal includes a reduction to lot area from 10,000 to 7,214 square-feet and a reduction to lot width from 100 to 60 feet. This proposal includes only one platted lot, whereas all other redevelopment proposals on Brightwater Drive have included multiple lots. Staff is aware of only two circumstances on Brightwater Drive where there are single lots that have been passed over through the redevelopment of adjacent properties. This proposal is different in that this lot is in between other lots to the east and west that also have not yet been proposed for redevelopment. The Small Motel District of Beach by Design recognizes that "although the existing improvements may not represent the theoretical 'highest and best' use of this area, the relatively good condition of most buildings and the economic value of the existing improvements make it difficult, if not impossible, to anticipate significant land assembly, demolition and new redevelopment." Beach by Design also recognizes Brightwater Drive as being "riper for redevelopment." The applicant has attempted to acquire the adjacent properties, but has been unsuccessful. Adjacent existing development on the properties to the east and west are also larger motels. While staff prefers a larger parcel, where reductions to lot area and lot width would not be necessary, staff also recognizes the circumstances of redevelopment proposals. In this case, while the lot is small, the applicant is not maximizing the number of units allowable and has designed a project, meeting setback requirements. . Community Development 2005-02-15 3 . The Mediterranean-style of architecture of the building will include soft yellow stucco for the main building color. The parapet walls will contain terra cotta barrel tile roofing. Banding, windows, doorframes, railings and other architectural features will be painted white. The landscape plan utilizes groundcover (giant green liriope), shrubs (pittosporum tobira and ilex shilling) and trees (queen palm) at the front of the property. The applicant proposes variegated ligustrum shrubs and queen palms along the east a"nd west property lines adjacent to the existing .developments. . The applicant is not proposing any signs with this development. Any future freestanding sign should be a monument-style sign of a maximum four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The proposal will utilize black barrels for trash (one per unit). These will be stored in a trash room on the northwest corner of the building and will be placed within a staging area adjacent to the public sidewalk on pickup days. All required Parks and Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. On-site utility facilities (electric and communication lines) will be required to be placed underground as part of the site redevelopment. Provisions for the placement of conduits for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of-way should be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. . The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 12, and December 30, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to lot area from 10,000 to 7,214 square-feet, a reduction to lot width from 100 to 60 feet, and an increase to building height of an additional three feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 35-foot height) and to permit a building within the" visibility triangles, wider the provisions of Section 2-803. B, for the site at 105 Brightwater Drive, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2) That boats moored at the docks, lift andior slips be for the exclusive use by the residents andior guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums; 3) That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 4) That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 5) That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 6) That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of " Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering . Department prior to the commencement of work; 7) That all Fire Department requirements be Community Development 2005-02-15 4 . . . met prior to the issuance of any permits; and 8) That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Concerns were expressed that one parking space is wider than normal, accessing it would require drivers to maneuver in the opposite direction, and vehicles cannot turn in a 20-foot radius. Engineering Manager Scott Rice said the parking space meets Code requirements. In response to questions, Senior Planner Wayne Wells said the building's color is softer than depicted in the packets. Although the Fire Marshall has determined that many Brightwater projects cannot proceed due to inadequate water pressure, this project is closer to Harnden and is not affected by the problem. The Fire Marshall reviewed and approved project egress. A building permit review is still necessary. Discussion ensued regarding fire escapes/egresses, elevator orientation. overuse of the property, and the lack of a handicapped parking space. Robert Szasz. applicant. said he never has been required to include handicapped spaces in these types of developments. Planning Director Cyndie Tarapani said the Building Official reviews those issues. Staff could confer with the developer regarding this issue or the CDB could continue the case until the matter is resolved. Member Johnson moved to continue Item E1, Case FLD2004-09065 for 105 Brightwater Drive to March 15, 2005. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 2. Case: ANX2004-12020 - 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard Level Three Application (Related to FLD2004-11081) Owner/Applicant: City of Clearwater Representative: Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Planning Department. (100 S. Myrtle Ave, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone and Street. Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-562-4587; fax: 727-562-4865; email: qina.clavton@mvclearwater.com). Location: 0.11-acre unnamed right-of-way 16 feet in width and 300 feet in length adjacent to the north edge of property located at 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, at the northern terminus of Bay Street and approximately 170 feet west of McMullen-Booth Road. Atlas Page: 244A. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.11-acre of road right~of-way to the City of Clearwater; (b) Provide an initial Future Land Use Plan designation to the Commercial General (CG) Category (City); and (c) Provide an initial zoning designation to the Commercial (C) District (City). Proposed Use: The site will remain vacant but will be incorporated into an existing property currently used for overnight accommodations. Neighborhood Association(s): Bay Breeze Trailer Park (Robert. Domzalski, 2975 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. Clearwater, FL 33759; phone: 727-796-2175); Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater. FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net). Presenter: Mark Parry. Planner III. The subject site is the western half of an unnamed right-of-way located at the northern terminus of Bay Street. approximately 170 feet west of McMullen-Booth Road. The right-of-way is 0.11 acre in area and abuts the north side of property located at 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. which currently is occupied by a 127 -room Fairfield Inn. The subject site is unimproved and does not provide access to any property. The developer of 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard is Community Development 2005-02-15 5 . . . requesting that the City process this annexation so the unimproyed right-of-way can be vacated and incorporated into the hotel property. The developer plans to construct another hotel, consisting of 55 overnight accommodation units, on the Fairfield Inn site (FLD2004-11081). The right-of-way is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the south and east; therefore, the pro pORed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The Planning Department is requesting that an initial Future Land Use Plan designation of Commercial General (CG) and a consistent zoning designation of the Commercial (C) District be provided for the right-of-way. The proposed annexation does not need City of Clearwater services, even though all services, including sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services could serve the property without any adverse effect on the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of: 1) the annexation of 0.11-acre of unnamed right-af-way into the City of Clearwater; 2) the Commercial General (CG) Category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) the initial zoning designation to the Commercial (C) zoning district pursuant to the City's 'Community Development Code. See motion page 24. 3. Level Two Application Case: FLD2004-11081 - 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-12020) Owners: RB-3 Associates, Randall Benderson 1993-1 Trust and WR-I Associates Ltd. Applicant: Benderson Development Company, Inc. Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036; email: nestech@mindsprinq.com). Location: 4.55 acres located on the northwest corner of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and McMullen-Booth Road. Atlas Page: 292A. Zoning District: Commercial (C). Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit an overnightaccommodatiori use with 55 additional rooms/units with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to 9.5 feet (to existing pavement), an increase to building height from 25 to 48.33 feet (to mid-point of pitched roof) with an additional 12.083 feet for architectural embellishments (above the mid-point of pitched roof) and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) Vacation of a portion of the Bay Street right-of-way to the west and a portion of the alley to the north. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations (additional 55 rooms/units). Neighborhood Associations: Bay Breeze Trailer Park (Robert, Domzalski, 2975 Gulf- to-Bay Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33759; phone: 727-796-2175); Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. Community Development 2005-02-15 6 . . . The 4.578 acres is on the northwest corner of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and McMullen- Booth Road. The site has approximately 465 linear feet of frontage on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and 400 linear feet on McMullen-Booth Road. The site currently includes the south eight feet of the eastern 160 feet of an alley along the north property line that has been annexed and vacated. The western portion of the platted alley right-of-way currently is located in unincorporated Pinellas County. The Bay Street right-of-way is located to the west of this parcel. The parcel currently is developed with the Fairfield Inn overnight accommodation use with 127 rooms/units. A retention pond abuts to the north, with the eastern portion within the City and the western portion in unincorporated Pinellas County. A two-story, over ground-level parking, office building is located to the west. The area north of Carolina Avenue, west of the subject site, is zoned Low Medium Density Residential District and is developed with detached dwellings. The area south of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard was formerly a mobile home park, has been bought by the City, and is intended as a park. The proposal includes construction of a new four-story building in the southwest portion of the site for a 55-room/unit overnight accommodation use (Comfort Suites). The southern portion of the site currently is undeveloped. Additional parking will be constructed in this southern area for hotel guests. Related to this application is the requested annexation of the western portion of a platted alley adjacent to the subject property. The eastern 160 feet of this platted alley already has been annexed into the City and vacated. The applicant also is seeking to vacate this western portion of the alley to the north. By rules of vacation, this site will obtain the southern eight feet (half of the alley width). The applicant also is seeking to vacate a portion of the Bay Street right-of-way to the west. The site plan indicates, through this vacation, that this site will obtain the east 30 feet of the right-of-way. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to 9.5 feet (to existing pavement). With the construction of the new overnight accommodation use (Comfort Suites), additional parking spaces are requ:red to be provided. The applicant proposes the new pavement edge 15 feet from the Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard property line. This proposed 15-foot setback coincides with the required 15-foot landscape buffer along this arterial roadway. Staff included in the advertised request the reduction to the setback along the north property line from 10 to 9.5 feet (to existing pavement), as the application approved to construct the Fairfield Inn (FLS 00-07-46 and FL 00-12- 64) indicated compliance with the 10-foot required setback. Should the balance of the alley be annexed and vacated, this existing setback would then meet Code requirements. A deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street has Deen included as part of this request. This site has been granted a deviation to this direct access restriction previously for the Fairfield Inn under FL 00-12-64, approved by the Community Development Board on February 20, 2001. A driveway access was constructed and is being retained with this request. Since this request is to construct an additional overnight accommodation use on the property, which carries. the same access restriction, staff has included the deviation in the request. There are no new or additional driveways proposed on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. The granting of a deviation for this request is appropriate. The site plan indicates 130 existing parking spaces on-site. Site inspection reveals that north of the existing Fairfield Inn some 90-degree parking spaces have been modified to angled Community Development 2005-02-15 7 . . . parking, which reduces the amount of existing parking. The proposal includes constructing an additional 53 parking spaces on the southern portion of the site to accommodate the new use, which will exceed the minimum requirement by one space. Prior to the issuance of any permits for the Comfort Suites, the site plan must demonstrate required parking for the entire site is being provided. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 25 to 48.33 feet (to mid-point of pitched roof), with an additional 12.083 feet for architectural embellishments (above the mid-point of pitched roof). The main roof for Code height determination is a pitched roof. Height is measured to the mid-point of the pitched roof. The Fairfield Inn was granted a height increase from 25 to 50 feet (to the flat roof deck). The requested 48.33 feet appears compatible with that existing on the property and with the office building to the west. This pitched roof does have a parapet as a vertical extension of the exterior walls that is lower than the mid-point of the pitched roof. The proposal has been advertised for the additional 12.083 feet for architectural embellishments (above the mid-point of pitched roof), which is a building projection above the lobby area. While this architectural embellishment projection is limited in location and size to the rest of the building and may not be disproportionate to the character of the building, it may allow an unnecessary increase in attached signage area that the applicant has not sufficiently justified. The Flexible Development case approved in 2001 included the condition "That any proposed, freestanding sign be limited to six feet in height above the finished grade of the front line of the parcel unless part of a Comprehensive Sign Program, as required by Code." There is an existing monument type sign adjacent to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, east of the driveway. A Comprehensive Sign Program was approved for this site, but only dealt with an increase from 24 to 45 square-feet of sign area for attached signage for the Fairfield Inn building. While no . . . additional freestanding signage is proposed with this request, a Comprehensive Sign Program would be required for any such additional freestanding signage, which should also be similarly restricted to a monument type sign a maximum of six feet high. The building elevation drawings for this proposal indicate two attached signs on the east elevation and one attached sign on the south elevation. Code provisions only permit one attached sign per business of a maximum of 24 square-feet. The large attached signs are approximately 104.5 square-feet in area. A Comprehensive Sign Program will be required for at least the attached signage shown, which will evaluate the appropriate number and size of attached signs. The site today is well. landscaped. While the southern portion of the site will be redeveloped to provide for the new building and parking, it is the intention of the proposal to retain the existing landscaping along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan will need to be revised to ensure the provision of required interior landscape area, the indication of existing tree canopies and the appropriate location of plant materials. Additionally, Staff is concerned with construction adjacent to the 27-inch oak tree just east of the proposed building and north of the porte cochere. Care must be demonstrated on construction drawings to ensure no grade cuts occurring under this tree's canopy, the proposed sidewalk being constructed "on grade" with a monolithic curb and the provision of a W.A.N.E. aeration system. A tree preservation plan is also required prior to the issuance of any permits. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General . Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) afld Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-704.C) have been met. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 30, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the (1) Flexible Community Development 2005-02-15 8 . . . Development approval to permit an overnight accommodation use with 55 additional rooms/units with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 to 15 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to 9.5 feet (to existing pavement), an increase to building height from 25 to 48.33 feet (to mid-point of pitched roof) with an additional 12.083 feet for architectural embellishments (above the mid-point of pitched roof) and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (2) Vacation of a portion of the Bay Street right-of-way to the west and a portion of the alley to the north for the site at 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1) That this approval be subject to the annexation of the alley to the north by City Council prior to the issuance of any permits; 2) That this approval be subject to the vacation of those portions of the Bay Street to the west and alley to the north rights-of- way by City Council prior to the issuance of any permits; 3) That the overnight accommodation use of this property meet the definition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days and where occupancy of rooms/units arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration. At the request of the City Manager or designee, the records of the business shall be made available for examination to determine whether the length of stay complies with these provisions. Failure to provide such records upon request shall be grounds for imposition of appropriate fines, revocation of the occupational license and/or any other enforcement afforded by law or by City regulations. A license must be obtained and maintained from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotels and Restaurants. A registration lobby operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, shall be maintained. This development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall rooms/units qualify for homestead exemption or home or business occupational licenses; 4) That compliance be demonstrated on building plans prior to the issuance of building permits indicating the number of rooms/units approved under this application will not be exceeded. Hotel rooms/units shall not incorporate lockout rooms/units with separate corridor doors; 5) That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised to demonstrate actual existing parking spaces and the provision of required parking for the overall site; 6) That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to issuance of any permits; 7) That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 8) That all freestanding and attached signage meet Code provisions, including the height and setback of any freestanding signs. The Comprehensive Sign Program may be utilized to provide additional freestanding and attached signage in accordance with Code provisions, but freestanding signage be limited to six feet in height above the finished grade of the front property line; 9) That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan be revised to ensure the provision of required interior landscape area, the indication of existing tree canopies and the appropriate location of plant materials; 10) That, prior to the issuance of any permits, site construction drawings be revised to ensure no grade cuts occurring under the 27-inch oak tree's canopy, the proposed sidewalk being constructed "on grade" with a monolithic curb and the provision of a W.A.N.E. aeration system; 11) That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture be submitted. This plan must show how the proposed building, Community Development 2005-02-15 9 . . parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how these impacts are addressed (ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation; 12) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits, including revising the site plan to indicate HS-20 grate inlets; 13) That draw down calculations be provided prior to the issuance of any permits to ensure the existing pond functions as originally designed; 14) That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; and 15) That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. See motion page 24. 4. Case: PL T2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC. Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036; email: nestech@mindsprinq.com). Location: 5.26 acres (3.68 acres upland and 1.58 acres submerged) located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue at the terminus of Nicholson Street, approximately 500 feet north of Seminole Street. Atlas Page: 277B. Zoning District: Downtown (D). Downtown Plan Character District: Old Bay. Request: Approval of a preliminary plat. . Proposed Use: 133 attached dwellings. Neighborhood Associations: Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association (Vicki Morgan, 301 Cedar Street, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-461-1995; email: vmorqan@tampabC!~ur.com); Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@Qte.net). Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner III. The preliminary plat application associated with the Flexible Development application (FLD2004-07053), approved on January 18, 2005, was not properly advertised. It was, however, included with the January 18, 2005 packet containing the Flexible Development application for your review. The Planning Department requested that the COB (Community Development Board) review and approve the Flexible Development application (FLD2004- 07053) contingent upon the preliminary plat being reviewed and approved at today's meeting. . The site is 5.26 acres (3.68 acres upland and 1.58 acres submerged) on the west side of North Osceola Avenue at the western terminus of Nicholson Street, approximately 500 feet north of Seminole Street. The property has an array of existing structures including a small wood-frame house and a two-story garage with a rental unit along the northeast property line fronting North Osceola Avenue. Boat repair and storage bays occupy the area along the north property line. Continuous open and covered boat slips are in the water along the east end of the marina. The vegetation along North Osceola Avenue is poorly maintained. The overall site appearance is poor and is targeted for redevelopment within the Clear-vater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Two driveways along North Osceola Avenue currently provide the . primary access to the site, with one driveway each located at the northeast and southeast Community Development 2005-02-15 10 . . . . " corners of the site. The existing buildings and parking spaces will be demolished and the site redeveloped with attached dwellings. The surrounding char~cter includes a mix of land uses. North Ward Elementary School is across Nicholson Street, northeast of the property. A mix of single-family and small multi- family buildings is located along the northwest property boundary. The Seminole Street boat- launching facility and an office/chapel are adjacent to the south of the site. Generally, the area remains in fair condition. The proposal includes a preliminary plat creating three lots. Lot One is at the southwest corner of the original parcel and is not included as part of the development approved on January 18.2005 (case FLD2004-07053). An existing bait house is on Lot One and that use will continue. Lot One does not have direct access to a public right-of-way. An access easement across Lot Two will be granted by the applicant providing access to Lot One to North Osceola Avenue and Nicholson Street. Lot Two is located along the south side of the site and will contain two townhome-style buildings along the south side of the site. These two buildings include five dwellings units in the easternmost building and three in the westernmost. Lot Three includes the east and north portion of the property and consists' of the bulk of the site~ Two . buildings one hundred feet in height with 125 dwelling units will be located on Lot Three. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 9, and November 12, 2004. The preliminary plat meets the requirements of the Code. The site plan for the redevelopment of this property was approved at the January 18, 2005 CDB meeting contingent upon preliminary plat approval at today's meeting The Planning Department recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat application with the following bases: Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 4-703, and 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. See motion page 24. 5. Level Two Application Cases: FLD2005-01 001/TDR2004-0801 O/PL T2004-00008 - 830 Court Street Owner/Applicant: James Landers; Court Street Villas, LLC. Representative: Brian S. Wilkes, Burcaw and Associates, Inc. (6402 W. Linebaugh Avenue suite A Tampa, FL 33625; phone 813-882-4815; fax: 813-882-3808; email: BWilkes@Burcawinc.com). Location: 0.39-acre site is at the northwest corner of Court Street and Prospect Avenue. Atlas Page: 287 A. Zoning District: Downtown (D). Downtown Plan Character District: Town Lake Residential. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit the transfer of two dwelling units from 608/610/611 Harold Court to 830 Court Street to be included as part of a 13-unit attached dwelling development (case FLS2004-06045) under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 - 1403, Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings (13 units) within the Downtown District and a building within the required sight visibility triangles Community Development 2005-02-15 11 . . . along the unnamed alley along the north side of the site under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and a preliminary plat (PL T2004-00008). Proposed Use: 13 attached dwellings. Neighborhood Associations: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net). Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner III. This 0.39-acre site is at the northwest corner of Court Street and Prospect Avenue within the Downtown Town Lake Residential character district. An alley (public right-of-way) 15 feet in width borders the site on the north. The surrounding area is characterized by a variety of uses including retail, office, restaurant and governmental uses. A vehicle service establishment (a use prohibited by the Downtown Plan) is located within a 1,529 square-foot, one-story building at the far northwest corner of the site. The remainder of the site is almost completely paved with a concrete parking lot. The site is accessed via four driveways with two each along Court Street and Prospect Avenue. The proposal includes locating 13 dwelling units within five, three story buildings 30 feet in height ranging between 1,100 and 1,132 square-feet in area. Two of the buildings (located along Prospect Avenue) will contain one dwelling unit each. One building (centrally located on the north side of the site) will contain three dwelling units and the remaining two buildings (one along the west side of the site the other along Court Street) will contain four dwelling units each. Parking will be provided with two-car garages beneath each unit (26 parking spaces). All existing pavement, driveways and structures will be removed with this proposal. The proposed site plan locates two buildings in the sight visibility triangles on the north side of the site at the intersection of the driveway arid the unnamed alley. These buildings are located within four feet of a one-way (eastbound only) unnamed alley. Adequate distance will be provided between the edge of the building and the alley for visibility. In addition, the alley is lightly used with the heaviest use anticipated to be from this development, further reducing any potential traffic conflicts. The site design will not have a detrimental effect on adjacent property or safety and provides for a more urban style of development consistent with the Downtown Plan. The proposal includes the provision of perimeter landscaping around the overall site in addition to foundation planting around the proposed building. The landscape plan should enhance the aesthetics of the site. This proposal includes the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) of two units to this site from 608/610/611 Harold Court, which currently is the subject of a pending Level One Flexible Standard application (case FLS2004-07054) to permit 16 attached dwellings where 18 units are permitted. The Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Plan allows the use of TDRs provided both the sender and receiving sites are located within the Downtown Plan area. The proposal is in compliance with the Plan policy regarding TDRs and the standards and criteria set forth in Community Development Code Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403. The proposai also includes platting (see case PL T2004-00008) the site into 13 separate townhome lots accessed via one driveway on the east side of the site along Prospect Avenue and one from the alley on the north side of the site. The design of the building is consistent with the intent and direction of the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Community Development 2005-02-15 12 . . . Plan. The buildings along Prospect Avenue and Court Street will present their primary facades towards those rights-of-way. The remaining buildings will be oriented inwards to the site. The proposed materials will be stucco, metal railings and standing seam metal roofs. Architectural details include standing seam metal awnings, raised window trim and banding. Outstanding Code enforcement issues associated with this site include non-compliant signage, general overgrovvth of plant material and weeds, storage of inoperative vehicles, poorly maintained building, grass parking, parking areas in poor repair and outdoor storage. These issues will be eliminated with the redevelopment of this site. The site is within the Town Lake Residential character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Plan recommends that this area be redeveloped as a residential district with neighborhood commercial uses. Residential development south of Cleveland Street should be oriented toward Town Lake but along major streets, development should be oriented toward the street to maintain an urban and pedestrian environment. This strategy has been identified as a way to stimulate the redevelopment of property in the area and to reposition the Downtown as a viable economic entity in the region. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes criteria against which proposals to be located within the Plan boundaries are measured and are discussed further in this report. The proposal is consistent with the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan including: 1) Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. This project will eliminate a prohibited use. (vehicle service) within the Town Lake Residential character district. It replaces it with an urban-style residential development with buildings located along and oriented towards all abutting streets, which furthers this vision statement; 2) Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The proposed buildings incorporate a contemporary style of architecture utilizing materials such as stucco and hipped, standing seam metal roofs and attractive earth-tone coiors which will further this vision statement; 3) Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. The proposal includes 13 dwelling units and provides 26 parking spaces (two parking spaces per dwelling unit) on-site where 20 are required and furthers this vision statement; 4) Vision: The elimination of blighting conditions and the revitalization of the existing and expanded CRA are critical to the future health of Downtown: A vehicle service establishment, which is a prohibited use within the Town Lake Residential character district, occupies the site. The site is somewhat deteriorated and the proposal will eliminate the existing blighting conditions and furthers this vision statement; 5) Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage rodevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. This project will provide five attractive new buildings housing 13 dwelling units furthering this goal of creating a vibrant downtown; 6) Obiective 1A: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The proposal provides 13 attached dwellings as part of an attractive development which replaces a prohibited use within the Downtown District (vehicle sales); 7) Obiective 1 G: Residential uses in Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability consistent with the character districts. The proposal ihcludes 13 attached dwelling units ranging in price between $205,000 and $229,000. The units will be between 1,100 and 1,132 square-feet in size; 8) Obiective 2A: The Downtown street grid should be maintained to provide multiple access points in and through Downtown, to assist in dispersing Community Development 2005-02-15 13 . . . traffic on various routes and contribute to improved traffic operations. Vacation of streets shall be evaluated based on redevelopment potential provided alternative access exists or can be provided. The proposai does not include the vacation of any existing streets and takes advantage of an existing one-way alley along the north side of the site maintaining the existing, surrounding street pattern. Four existing driveways will be replaced with two driveways with one each along Prospect Avenue and the alley along the north side of the site; 9) Obiective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The proposal includes five new, well-designed buildings utilizing a modern style of architecture incorporating high-quality materials and an attractive earth-tone color; 10) Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new. construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. The proposal meets all of the requirements of the Design Guidelines including limiting access points to side streets, locating parking beneath the buildings and otherwise buffering it from adjacent public rights-of- way with landscaping and fencing, providing an attractive, well-designed buildings utilizing a modern style of architecture. The front doors of all the units of building A face Court Street. The front doors of buildings 0 and E address Prospect Avenue. The facades of buildings Band C, which face the unnamed alley along the north side of the site, do not provide front doors which open to that alley but do provide an extensive use of windows and balconies; 11) Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. The proposed development will contribute positively to the vision of the character district by providing a high quality, attractive residential use and eliminating a prohibited use (vehicle service); 12) Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The proposal includes five attractive three-story buildings, in scale with other buildings in the area, located directly along Court Street. Extensive landscaping will be provided which will further enhance the site; 13) Policy 7: Transfer of Development Rights are permitted for all projects to assist development provided that both the sending and receiving sites are located in the Downtown Plan area. Approval of Transfer of Development Rights on a site may allow an increase in the development potential in excess of the maximum development potential of the applicable character district. The number of development rights transferred to any site with a Future Land Use Plan designation of Central Business District (CBD) are not limited, however, transfers to sites with a designation other than CBD shall not exceed the applicable maximum development potential by 20 percent. All uses of transfer of development rights shall ensure that the receiving site remains consistent with the vision of the applicable character district. The proposal includes the transfer of two dwelling units from 608/610/611 Harold Court, which is in the South Gateway District and meets all the requirements of Sections 4-1401 - 1403 of the Community Development Code. The transfer of two dwelling units to the subject site (830 Court Street) will result in a more viable residential development; 14) Policy 11: Nonconforming uses are encouraged to relocate to a zoning district that permits their use. The City shall explore all incentives and planning tools that will assist in the relocation of nonconforming uses. Use of the Community Development Code tool known as "Termination of Status as a Nonconformity" is not permitted within the Downtown Plan area. The proposal will result in the elimination of a prohibited use (vehicle service) and the establishment of 13 attached dwelling units in an attractive townhome development; and 15) Policy 24: The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets. The proposal includes Code-compliant sidewalks along Court Street and Prospect Avenue. Community Development 2005-02-15 14 . The proposal is consistent with the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Town Lake Residential character district including Vision: The Town Lake Residential District will primarily be redeveloped as a residential district with neighborhood commercial uses. This project will provide a new 13 unit attached townhome development and eliminates an existing prohibited use and furthers this vision statement. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 9, and November 12, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development application to permit the transfer of two dwelling units from 608/610/611 Harold Court to 830 Court Street to be included as part of a 13-unit attached dwelling development under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 - 1403, Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings (13 units) within the Downtown District and a building within the required sight visibility triangles along the unnamed alley along the north side of the site under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and a preliminary plat (PL T2004-00008) for the site at 830 Court Street, with the following bases and conditions: . Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1402; 2) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria for a Transfer of Development Rights per Section 4-1403; 3) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; 5) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C.; 6) The proposal complies with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 7) The proposal is in compliance with the Vision, Goals, Objects and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Town Lake Residential character district; 8) The development is in compliance with the Downtown Design Guidelines; and 9) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. . Conditions of Approval: 1) That evidence of filing of a final plat with Pine lias County be submitted to Staff prior to the issuance of any building permits; 2) That a sidewalk which matches the City's Commercial B street per the Master Wayfinding and Streetscaping Plan with regard to materials be installed per City standards and specifications; 3) That any future changes to the buildings (color, material, design, fencing, etc.) be reviewed and approved by the Planning Staff; 4) That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final Comprehensive Sign Program package (as required) submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes that: a) All signs be designed as part of an overall theme that respect, enhance and contribute to the architectural style, detailing and elements of a building; b) All signs consist of design, colors; materials, size, shape and methods of illumination which reinforce the overall design of the fa<(ade; c) All attached signs are installed so the method of installation is concealed or made an integral part of the design of the sign; d) All wall signs be located on flat, unadorned parts of a fa<(ade such as the horizontal band between the storefront and second floor or on windows, awning flaps, fascia, etc.; and e) The letter size, letter and word spacing, tont style and other design elements of all signs create an overall high quality aesthetic appearance; 5) That all proposed utilities (from the right-ot-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-ot-way shall be installed along the entire site's street Community Development 2005-02-15 15 . . . frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 6) That revised plans be submitted which accurately depict all required erosion and sediment control techniques; 7) That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities. electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 8) That all Traffic Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; and 9) That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 608 Harold Court and being transferred to 830 Court Street, be recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 608 Harold Court due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (830 Court Street) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits. See motion page 24. 6. Item Pulled from Consent Agenda Case: FLD2004-11 079 - 501 S. Missouri Avenue Level Two Application Owner: Valentine L. Ayers Applicant/Representative: Mark A. Jonnatti, AlA, Jonnatti Architecture Incorporated (21021 US Highway 19 N., Clearwater, FL 33765; phone: 727-725-2724; fax: 727-725- 2603; email: mionnatti@jarch.com).. Location: 0.276 acre on the southeast corner of the intersection of Missouri Avenue and Court Street. Atlas Page: 2968. Zoning District: Commercial (C). Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 351 square-foot addition to an existing building with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 to 2.9 feet (to existing pavement) and from 25 to 16.9 feet (to existing building), reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 to 3.9 feet (to existing pavement) and from 25 to 20.7 feet (to existing building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 to three feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2-704.C., as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 to 2.9 feet, a reduction to the landscape buffer along Court Street from 15 to 3.9 feet and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from five to three feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 1202.G. Proposed Use: Dental office. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, . President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net): Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner III. The applicant's representative requested this item be pulled from the Consent Agenda. The 0.276-acre site is at the southeast corner of South Missouri Avenue and Court Street, two heavily traveled corridors, and is accessed via driveways at the northeast and Community Development 2005-02-15 16 . southwest corners of the site. The lot is completely paved with concrete and is occupied by a 1,494 square-foot, one-story building, which recently was painted lavender. The building currently is unoccupied. This site has housed a variety of businesses including auto loans, a discount auto store, and beepers and cell phone sales. The surrounding land uses include a variety of intense commercial activities such as auto rental, retail services, automotive repair, tire sales, and fast food establishments. The proposal is to establish a dental office on this site. The application is seeking setback and landscape buffer reductions along all sides of the site. The reductions will provide a more economically, viable project without a significant reduction in the quality of the site, building or landscape design. The setback reductions are for existing pavement and the existing building, without which it would be difficult to develop the site with any use. The proposal also includes a one-story addition of 351.44 square-feet of gross floor area to the south side of the existing building resulting is total gross floor area of 1,845.24 square- feet. The proposal includes removing 1,486.68 square-feet of concrete paving in order to install iandscaping. The n~w iandscaping will be installed primarily at the northwest corner of the site at the intersection of South Missouri Avenue and Court Street. The landscape plan utilizes a variety of plans including live oaks, crepe myrtles, Iiriope, lantana, Indian hawthorne, hibiscus and plumbago. Revisions to the landscape plan will be required prior to the issuance of any permits, including the installation of interior landscape trees, perimeter hedges and the removal of the excess concrete beyond parking spa~es from the east and south sides of the building. Access will be maintained at the southwest and northeast corners of the site. The proposal also includes the provision of 11 parking spaces where eight spaces are required. . Waste removal will be by.a black barrel container. A sign package has not been submitted with this application however, any signage will need to be architecturally integrated into the design of the site (freestanding) and building. Channel letters should be used for any proposed attached signage. A low, monument-style sign will be required should a freestanding sign be requested. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 30, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible Development application to permit a 351 square-foot addition to an existing building with reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 t02.9 feet (to existing pavement) and from 25 to 16.9 feet (to existing building), reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 to 3.9 feet (to existing pavement) and from 25 to 20.7 feet (to existing building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to pavement) under the provisions of Section 2-704.C., as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along South Missouri Avenue from 15 to 2.9 feet, a reduction to the landscape buffer along Court Street from 15 to 3.9 feet and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from five to three feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 1202. G, for the site at 501 South Missouri Avenue with the following bases and conditions. . Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance redevelopment efforts. Community Development 2005-02-15 17 . . . Conditions of Approval: 1) That a revised landscape plan, acceptable to Planning staff, be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits, including the installation of interior landscape trees, perimeter hedges and the removal of the excess concrete beyond parking spaces from the east and south sides of the building; 2) That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes: a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color, font style and size; b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; c) All attached signs consist of channel letters; d) Any freestanding sign be designed as a monument-style at a maximum height of six feet; and e) The removal of the two existing freestanding (pole) signs prior to Certificate of Occupancy; 3) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 4) That approved SWFWMD and FDOT permits or letters of exemption be provided prior to the issuance of any permits; and 5) That any Traffic Impact fee be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Senior Planner Mark Parry said the applicant opposes Condition #2. Ms. Tarapani said the Code requires all applications for the same property to be processed simultaneously. In this case, the developer did not submit a signage proposal with the application. Mark Jonnatti, representative, said the owner recently leased this property for a five-year term. He said the site is nonconforming, with wall-to-wall asphalt. He said the applicant plans to provide low cost dental work and has received a permit for minor interior remodeling. The applicant also has pulled a sign permit. He said the existing sign is 5 x 9 feet. The applicant proposes to add a small break room/conference room, but first must bring the property into compliance before changes can be made. He said the applicant proposes a buffer along Court Street and Missouri Avenue. Mr. Jonnatti said the applicant was unaware of the signage issue until Thursday. The applicant's landlord will not permit him to remove signs, therefore he cannot proceed with the proposed project. Mr. Jonnatti requested the CDS approve the application without Condition #2, as the project would result in significant improvements to the site. Ms. Tarapani said as this site is being redeveloped, signage must conform to current Code. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said the applicable section of Code is strictly enforced. In response to a quesUon, Mr. Jonnatti said even if the owner/landlord permitted the removal of signs, the applicant still opposes Condition #2. He said the applicant has permits to renovate the building and replace the sign faces. Ms. Tarapani said permits are not required to change out sign faces. Mr. Jonnatti said the applicant knows he cannot construct the addition without site approvals. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said the change of use from retail sales and service to office use affects sign compliance. Mr. Jonnatti disagreed, stating the property previously had an office use. Discussion ensued with a suggestion that substandard sized parking spaces be increased, as the space sizes are inconsistent. Ms. Tarapani said the number of parking spaces appear to be adequate for a dental office use. Community Development 2005-02-15 18 . . . Member Johnson moved to deny Item E6, Case FLD2004-11 079 for 501 S. Missouri Avenue. Discussion ensued with a remark regarding the petitioner's opposition to Condition #2. Member Johnson withdrew his motion. Member Coates moved to continue Item E6, Case FLD2004-11079 for 501 S. Missouri Avenue to March 15, 2005. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. 7. Item Pulled from Consent Agenda Case: FLD2004-01 005 - 1501 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue Level Two Application Owner: Florence Panteles Applicant/Representative: Gordon F. Killion, (1747 Winfield Road North, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-278-7192; fax: 727-443-4424; email: Qfkillion1@verizon.net). Location: 0.172 acre on the southeast corner of the South Fort Harrison and Woodlawn Street intersection. Atlas Page: 3138. Zoning District: Commercial (C). Request: Flexible Development approval to re-establish a major vehicle service use with a front (west) setback reduction from 25 to zero feet (to existing pavement), an east side setback reduction from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), a south side setback reduction from 10 to zero feet (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704 and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Auto body shop. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@Qte.net). Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner III. Member Coates requested this item be pulled from the Consent Agenda. The 0.172-acre site is at the southeast corner of South Fort Harrison Avenue and Woodlawn Street and contains a vacant 1,956 square-foot, one-story building. The building is 13 feet from the front (west) property line along south Fort Harrison Avenue, one foot from the front (north) property line along Woodlawn Street, 15 feet from the side (east) property line and 31 feet from the site (south) setback. The building has been built to house this specific use and has historically been used since at least 1997 as an automotive service garage. The occupational license for the automotive service garage expired in 2001. The site is almost completely paved and can be accessed directly along South Fort Harrison Avenue or Woodlawn Street. The site and building have undergone some deterioration. The proposal is to re-establish a major vehicle service use (auto body repair) within the existing building. Major vehicle service is not a permitted use within the Commercial District, and this request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for this reason. Again, this building has been designed for this type use. The proposal includes setback reductions along the front (west) along South Fort Harrison Avenue and sides (east and south). The site is small and slightly irregular in shape. The building generally was constructed parallel to South Fort Harrison Avenue, with irregular Community Development 2005-02-15 19 . setbacks along Woodlawn Street. The reduction in setbacks to existing pavement and the existing building will provide an economically viable project without a significant reduction in the quality of the site, building or landscape design. Without the setback reductions it would be difficult to develop the site with any use. The primary access to the site will be limited to a one-way driveway with ingress located along Woodlawn Street at the northwest corner of the site and egress along South Fort Harrison Avenue at the southwest corner of the site. A second access point is located along Woodlawn Street at the northeast corner of the site, providing access to two parking spaces. These two spaces will back out into Woodlawn Street. Due to the low volume of traffic along Woodlawn Street, the City's Traffic Engineer has approved this parking arrangement. The proposal includes five on-site parking spaces. With the removal of a significant amount of asphalt on-site and within the rights-of-way, parking of vehicles should be prohibited from the rights-of-way areas adjacent to this site. The proposal also includes the removal of a significant amount of asphalt in order to provide landscaping. Landscaping will be provided along the front (north) property along Woodlawn Street and South Fort Harrison Avenue, and along the sides (east and south) of the site. The landscape plan includes a mix of plants including Dahoon Holly, Live Oak, Indian Hawthorne and Sable Palm. . A sign package has not been submitted wit~ this application, however, any signage will need to be architecturally integrated into the design of the site (freestanding) and building. Channel letters should be used should attached signage be requested. Should a freestanding sign be desired, a monument-style sign a maximum of six feet high will be required. The proposal includes a dumpster that will be moved to a staging area on pickup days. The location of the dumpster enclosure and staging area will need to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of any permits. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-704.C) have been met. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 30, 2004. The Planning Department recommends approval to re-establish a major vehicle service use with a front (west) setback reduction along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a side (east) setback reduction from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a side (south) setback reduction from 10 feet to zero feet (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill RedeveloRment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. and a reduction in landscape buffer as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for the site at 1501 South Fort Harrison Road with the following revised bases and conditions (revised since staff report originally sent to the CDB): Bases for Approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive InfillRedevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C; 2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3) The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance redevelopment efforts. . Conditions of Approval: (*condition added subsequent to this report being sent to CDB): 1) That a revised landscape plan, acceptable to the Planning staff, be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits, including the number and location of plant materials and the location of Community Development 2005-02-15 20 . . . sod; 2) That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any sign permits which includes: a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; c) All attached signs consist of channel letters; and d) Any freestanding sign be designed as a monument-style at a maximum height of six feet; 3) That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised to indicate the location of the dumpster enclosure and staging area, meeting the requirements of the Solid Waste Department; 4) That the parking of vehicles be prohibited from the rights-of-way areas adjacent to this site; 5) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 6) That an approved DOT permit for driveway modification/relocation be provided to City staff prior to the issuance of any permits; and 7) That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised to reflect the ingress only from South Fort Harrison Avenue at the existing curb cut and egress only to Woodlawn Street, revised driveway connection on South Fort Harrison Avenue and revised accessible route from the building to the public sidewalk.* In response to a concern regarding onsite curbs, Mr. Parry said the applicant's representative had met with FOOT (Florida Department of Transportation) regarding a permit to alter the driveway on South Fort Harrison Avenue. As stated in the staff report, FOOT indicated the existing curb cut must be used and will not permit the driveway to be moved or widened. Based on this requirement, the site plan will be modified and the traffic pattern will allow ingress only from South Fort Harrison and egress only to Woodlawn Street. The route from the building to the public sidewalk also will be modified. Discussion ensued with comments that this location may not be appropriate for this use, the proposed use is not permitted, regardless of tradeoffs to clean up the property, and the COB should review the final site plan prior to voting. Mr. Parry said development of this site would be difficult as it is less than 7,500 square- feet. Any use will require flexible standard review and COB approval. Only very small office uses that generate little traffic would fit. In response to a question, Mr. Parry said staff has determined that an auto body shop would not generate much traffic. Junk cars would not be permitted on site. The site's location on a major thoroughfare makes the business easy to see, so tradeoffs exist. The dumpster must be oriented for easy access and will be located in the building's front corner. Florence Panteles, applicant, said an auto body shop was on this site for over 25 years. She said she wants to open an auto body shop and leave it to her sons. She said FOOT had denied her request to install a traffic light in front. Ms. Penteles said she is willing to comply with the Code with respect to landscaping, parking spaces, signage, paint colors, etc. Gordon Killion, representative, said the applicant has worked with staff since December and has submitted four site plans. He said last Friday, FOOT informed the applicant regarding driveway issues. As a result, the driveway will be aligned to meet FDOT requirements. He said there is no other place for the dumpster. The applicant also plans to replace 1,500 feet of asphalt with landscaping. He said the applicant does not wish to delay this project. He said the City Engineer approved the ingress on Fort Harrison. He said the site has not generated revenue for two years. Community Development 2005-02-15 21 Discussion ensued regarding egress and ingress issues and a comment that the applicant . has improved the property, and the project will improve that corner. Member Johnson moved to approve Item E7, Case FLD2004-01005 for 1501 South Fort Harrison Avenue with Bases for Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed. The motion was duly seconded. Members Plisko, Johnson, Coates, and Tallman and Gildersleeve voted "Aye"; Acting Member Dennehy voted "Nay." Motion carried. 8. Case: ANX2004-11018 - 2770 S.R. 590 Level Three Application Owner/Applicant: Laura Dennis. Location: 0.22 acre at the northeast corner of S.R. 590 and Grove Drive. Atlas Page: 264B. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.22 acre to the City of Clearwater; (b) Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Urban (RU) Category (County) to Residential Urban (RU) Category (City of Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District (County) to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District (City of Clearwater). Proposed Use: Single-family dwelling (existing and no change proposed). Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL .33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net). Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner III. . This annexation involves a 0.224-acre parcel at the northeast corner of SR 590 and Grove Drive. The property is within an enclave and is contiguous with existing City boundaries to the east and south; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. The applicant is requesting this annexation to receive sewer and solid waste service. It is proposed that the property have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Urban (RU) and a zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The applicant receives water service from Pinellas County. Sewer service will be provided by the City of Clearwater and capacity for the project is available for this utility. The closest sewer line is in the adjacent Grove Street right-of-way. The applicant has paid the required sewer impact and assessment fees and is aware of the costs to extend City sewer service to the property. The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the serVice level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation and eliminates an enclave. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of 1) the annexation of 0.224 acre to the City of Clearwater; 2) the Residential Urban (RU) Category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development Code. . See motion page 24. Community Development 2005-02-15 22 9. Case: ANX2004-11 017 - 1617 Sherwood Street Leve/ Three Application Owner/Applicant: Central Realty, Inc. Location: 0.18 acre at the southwest corner of Sherwood Street and Ridge Avenue. Atlas Page: 2708. Request: (a) Annexation of 0.18 acre to the City of Clearwater (b) Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Low (RL) Category (County) to Residential Low (RL) Category (City of Clearwater); and (c) Rezoning from R-3, Single-Family Residential District (County) to Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District (City of Clearwater). Proposed Use: Single-family dwelling (site currently vacant) Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition (Doug Williams, President, 2544 Frisco Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-725-3345; email: Diw@qte.net). Presenter: Karl Wielecki, Planner II. . . The subject property is at the southwest corner of Sherwood Street and Ridge Avenue. The subject site is 0.182 acre in area and currently is vacant. It was formerly occupied by a single-family detached dwelling. The applicant is requesting this annexation in order to receive City sewer and solid waste service. The property is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the east, south, and west; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntai)' annexation. It is proposed that the abutting Sherwood Street right-of-way not currently within the City limits also be annexed. It is proposed that the property have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning category of Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR). The property currently receives water service from the City of Clearwater. The City will provide sanitary sewer service as well and capacity for the project is available for this utility. The closest sewer line is located at the southwest corner of the site. The applicant is aware of the costs to extend service to this site and has paid the sanitary sewer impact and assessment fees. The Pinellas County Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan designate the site as Residential Low (RL). It is the purpose of this category to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a low density residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the low density, non-intensive qualities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. Residential is the primary use in this plan category up to a maximum of five (5) dwelling units per acre. Secondary uses include Residential Equivalent; Institutional; Transportation/Utility; Public Educational Facility; Ancillary Non-Residential and Recreation/Open Space. The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services including sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries. . Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of: 1) the annexation of the property located at 1617 Sherwood Street, along with the abutting Sherwood Street right-of-way; 2) the Residential Low (RL) Category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) zoning district pursuant to the City's Community Development 2005-02-15 23 . Community Development Code. Acting Member Dennehy moved to recommend approval of Item E2, Case ANX2004- 12020 (Related to FLD2004.-11 081) for 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, and to approve Item E3, Case FLD2004-11081 (Related to ANX2004-12020) for 3070 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard with Bases of Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed, Item E4, Case PL T2004-00012 for 900 North Osceola Avenue with Bases of Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed, Item E5, Case FLD2005-01 001/TDR2004-0801 O/PL T2004-00008 for 830Court Street with Bases of Approval and Conditions of Approval as listed, and recommended approval of Item E8, Case ANX2004- 11018 for 2770 SR 590, and Item E9, Case ANX2004-11 017 for 1617 Sherwood Street. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. F. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS: 1. Time Extension - FLD2002-09030, 650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa On November 19, 2002, the CDB approved Case FLD2002-09030 with six conditions for the site at 650 Bay Esplanade for the construction of 28 attached dwellings (condominium). The request was for Flexible Development approval to reduce the required side (north) setback from 10 to five feet (to pavement), reduce the front (west) setback along Poinsettia Avenue from 15 to zero feet (to building), reduce the front (east) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 to zero feet (to building), reduce the front (south) setback along Bay Esplanade from 15 to three feet (to pavement) and increase the height from 50 to 65 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), under the provisions of Section 2-803. . On March 18, 2003, the CDB approved a revised application with six conditions to clarify/correct the requested height of a building previously approved (clarified the increase to height from 50 to 69.5 feet [as measured from base flood elevation]). By letter dated February 27,2004, the Community Development Coordinator approved a one-year time extension to submit for a building permit for this project until March 18, 2005. All prior conditions of approval from the CDB were included in the Development Order for the time extension. Section 4-407 of the Code provides the ability for the CDB to approve one additional time extension for a time period not to exceed one year. On February 1, 2005, the applicant submitted a request for such additional time extension. This Code Section requires the CDB receive the time extension request within the period of validity (which this request meets) and provides the following review standards: 1. "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." "Good causes may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." Response: The applicant has provided their reasons for good cause in their letter from Troy J. Perdue dated .January 24, 2005, and from Dennis E. O'Keefe dated February 1, 2005. . 2. "The Community Development Board may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly affect the project." Community Development 2005-02-15 24 . . . Response: The site is located within the "Old Florida District" of Beach by Design. The Planning Staff is conducting a study of this district with regard to existing and ongoing development patterns. The study will not be completed until early summer of 2005 and will not be acted upon by the City Council until early fall 2005. Since the study has not yet been completed it is too early to ascertain whether any Code amendments that may result from this study will significantly affect this project. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. Conditions: 1) That the density of the site be limited to 28 dwelling units (30 dwelling units per acre); 2) That the final design of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or as modified by the CDB; 3) That the height of the building be limited to 69.5 feet as measured from base flood elevation; 4) That should addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board for review; 5) That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; and 6) That all signage comply with Code; and 7) That the time extension valid be for a period of time not to exceed seven months from the date of this time extension approval (September 15, 2005). Member Plisko moved to approve the requested time extension from the original date of March 18, 2004, to the new date of September 15, 2005, for the project approved under Case FLD2002-09030 for the site at 650 Bay Esplanade, with the conditions listed by staff. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Other Ms. Tarapani said if approved by City Council, the PPC (Pine lias Planning Council) will assist the City with: 1) Review of annexation applications; 2) Code Review; and 3) Perform a fee study. Ms. Dougall-Sides said in the case, Cepcot v. City, the Circuit Court had found the applicant met all conditions for approval and remanded the matter back to the CDB for appropriate action. The court also indicated some areas of the Code could less ambiguous. Staff will work on the language. It was commented that the COB Workshop went well. Staff will send letters of thanks for their presentations at the workshop to the cities of St. Petersburg and Largo. G. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 2:32 p.m. ~, Bo Community Development 2005-02-15 25 p' .... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1. Case: PLT2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue / ;' X YES NO 2. Case: TDR2004-08010/ FLD2005-01001/ PLT2004-00008 - 830 Court Street \. ;\ YES NO 3. Case: FLD2004-09065 - 105 Brightwater Drive YES NO 4. Case: FLD2004-11081- 3070 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-11018) , \ YES NO 5. Case:FLD2004-10076/TDR2004-10014 -12 ldlewild Street i YES NO ; -', f 6. Case: FLD2004-11 079 - 501 S. Missouri Avenue >: YES /' " NO 7. Case: FLD2004-0 1005 - 1501 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue " ; V17S "'TO "f ..Ln, 1'1' LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS 8. Case: ANX2004-11 018 - 2770 S.R. 590 YES \, if \/ NO 9. Case: ANX2004-11017 -: 1617 Sherwood Street YES .... ,,/ :. '" TO .1, 1111 f <, IV 11 DIRECTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1): 1. TimeEx~ension - FLD2002-09030, 650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa \/i YES NO l~ /'-" ~ . ( , Signature: \'1 ___1 ..1-----#>.-----", " S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, propertyinvestigation check list.doc 2 . I Date: 'vi 1)'[0 '\ / " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1. Case: PLT2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue ~YES NO 2. Case: T!)R2004-08010/ FLD2005-01001/ PLT2004-00008 - 830 Court Street / YES NO 3. Case: FLp2004-09065 - 105 Brightwater Drive /'YES NO 4. Case: FLJ)2004-11081- 3070 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-11 018) / YES NO 5. Case: FLD2004-1 00 76/TDR2004-1 0014 -12 ldlewild Street ~/ YES NO 6. Case: FLD2004-11 079 - 501 S Missouri Avenue // 1/ YES NO 7. Case: ~2004-0 1005 - 1501 S Ft. Harrison Avenue ~ YES NO LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS 8. Case: ANX2004-11018 - 27]0 SR. 590 YES ,/ NO 9. Case: ANX2004-11017 -1617 Sherwood Street / YES ',,/ NO ~ lo DIRECTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1): l.Ti Signature: S: \Planning Department\C 2-09030,650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa NO B, property investigation check list.doc 2 Date: ~,'" ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. lo/f;': PLT2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue X YES NO e: TDR2004-08010/ FLD2005-01001/ PLT2004-00008 - 830 Court Street e: FLD2004-11081 - 3070 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-11 018) YES NO a : FLD2004-1 00 76/TDR2004-1 0014 -12 ldlewild Street YES NO s : FLD2004-11 079 - 501 S. Missouri Avenue LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS : se: ANX2004-11018 - 2770 S.R. 590 t YES NO ase: ANX2004-11017 -1617 Sherwood Street YES NO ~ . " . CTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1): Extension - FLD2002-09030, 650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa YES NO Date: D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc 15~MJ1~.{ 7~ 2 \.. p COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1. Case: PfJl'2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue J YES NO 2. Case: TDR2004-08010/ FLD2005-01001/ PLT2004-00008 - 830 Court Street /" YES NO 3. Case: FLD2004-09065 - 105 Brightwater Drive YES )( NO 4. Case: FLD2004-11081- 3070 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-11018) l/ YES NO 5. Case: FLD2004-1 00 76/TDR2004-1 0014 -12 ldlewild Street YES )( NO 6. Case: FLD2004-11079 - 501 S Missouri Avenue / YES NO 7. Case: FLD2004-01005 -1501 S Ft. Harrison Avenue /' YES NO LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS 8. Case: ANX2004-11018 - 2770 SR. 590 YES ~ NO 9. Case: ANX2004-11017 -1617 Sherwood Street YES ~ NO " . DIRECTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1): 1. Time ~.tension - FLD2002-09030, 650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa /' (I, YES NO Signature: S:\Planning epartment\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc Date: z,,11~or 2 - " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1. Case: PLT2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue x: . YES NO 2. Case: TDR2004-08010/ FLD2005-01001/ PLT2004-00008 - 830 Court Street K YES NO 3. Case: FLD2004-09065 - 105 Brightwater Drive YES ~ NO . 4. Case: FLD2004-11081 - 3070 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-11 018) YES x:: NO 5. Case: FLD2004-1 00 76/TDR2004-1 0014 -12 ldlewild Street ~, YES NO 6. Case: FLD2004-11079 - 501 S Missouri Avenue YES / NO 7. Case: FLD2004-01005 -1501 S Ft. Harrison Av(mue ./ YES NO LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS 8. Case: ANX2004-11 018 - 2770 SR. 590 YES V. NO I 9. Case: ANX2004-11017 -1617 Sherwood Street YES Y NO ... . \. DIRECTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1): 1. Time extension - FLD2002-09030, 650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa ../ ~ NO Signature: - - -,;' . S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc 2 Date: 2- {t;;-O$ . . 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1. Case: PLT2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue / YES NO 2. Case: TDR2004-08010/ FLD2005-01001/ PLT2004-00008 - 830 Court Street /' YES NO 3. Case: FLD2004-09065 - 105 Brightwater Drive /' YES NO 4. Case: FLD2004-11081- 3070 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-11 018) ,/ YES NO . 5. Case: FLD2004-1 00 76/l}2>R2004-1 0014 -12 ldlewild Street YES ./ NO 6. Case: FLD2004-11 079 - 501 S. Missouri Avenue ,/ YES NO . 7. C~2004-0J005 -1501 S. Ft. Harrison Av,mue YES NO LEVEL THREE APPLICA TIONS 8. Case: A~4-11018 - 2770 S.R. 590 / YES" NO X2004-11017 -1617 Sherwood Stre YES NO c. \ \-:..' '.. ~ ,,\\'?;\ .~< ~ \\~S~~ " f., ., t..J' . ~ ), \'7J.... \. ., \ ......-'.(.1,: \ ,.-- ",",:^~::........ ' '; \ ,,', (., \ ,..-<----..--::') " \.\.~ ~..;;_. \:~~-', . .--\ -- ~P' ~. DIRECTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1): Signature: S:\Planning ension - FLD2002-09030, 650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa YES NO t C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc Date: ,....-- eJ.- /~t?S 2 r .. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Meeting Date: February 15, 2005 I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the following properties. 1. Case: PLT2004-00012 - 900 North Osceola Avenue YES V NO 2. Case: TDR2004-08010/ FLD2005-01001/ PLT2004-00008 - 830 Court Street ./ YES NO ,'3. Case: FLD2004-09065 - 105 Brightwater Drive ~ YES NO 4. Case: FLD2004-11081- 3070 Gulf to Bay Boulevard (Related to ANX2004-11 018) V YES NO 5. Case: FLD2004-1 00 76/TDR2004-1 0014 -12 ldlewild Street i YES ,/ NO 6. Case: FLD2004-11 079 - 501 S Missouri Avenue V YES NO 7. Case: FLD2004-01005 -1501 S Ft. Harrison Avimue V' YES NO LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS 8. Case: ANX2004-11018 - 2770 SR. 590 YES ~NO 9. Case: ANX2004-11017 -1617 Sherwood Street v/ NO YES y .. DIRECTOR'S ITEM: (Item 1): 1. Time Extension - FLD2002-09030, 650 Bay Esplanade, LaRisa YES V NO , operty investigation check list.doc Date: ~r~ Signature: S:\Planning Depa 2