01/21/2003
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
January 21, 2003
Present: Carlen A. Petersen
Ed Hooper
David Gildersleeve
Edward Mazur, Jr.
Shirley Moran
John Doran
Kathy Milam
Chair
Vice Chair
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Board Member
Alternate Board Member - voting
Absent: Alex Plisko
Board Member
Also Present: Leslie Dougall-Sides
Cyndi Tarapani
Lisa Fierce
Gina Clayton
Brenda Moses
Assistant City Attorney
Planning Director
Assistant Planning Director
Long Range Planning Manager
Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation
and Pledge of Allegiance.
.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not
necessarily discussed in that order.
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: December 17, 2002
Member Gildersleeve moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of December
17,2002, as submitted in written summation to each board member. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
B. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE (Item 1):
.
1. Case: FLD2002-10036 - 900 North Osceola Avenue * Leve/2 Application
Owner: Decade eo-xIv.
Applicant: Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC.
Representative: Don Harrill.
Location: 8.89-acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, at the western
terminus of Nicholson Street.
Atlas Page: 277B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of a building with attached
dwellings from 30 feet to 149 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, and to
reduce the buffer width along the north property line from 10 feet to five feet, as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.
Proposed Use: The application includes 146 attached condominium dwellings, eight attached
townhome dwellings, 120-slip marina (73 public slips and 43 slips reserved for condos), and
7,500 square-foot nonresidential uses (restaurant/ship's store/marina office)
Community Development 2003-01
1
1/21/03
.
Neighborhood Association(s): Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association, Edgewater Drive
Association, Stevenson Creek Neighborhood Association, Navajo Park Association, and North
Greenwood Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
* To be continued to a later date.
Member Mazur declared a conflict of interest.
Member Gildersleeve moved to continue Item B 1, Case FLD2002-10036, to a date
uncertain. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Members Gildersleeve,
Moran, Hooper, Doran, Milam, and Chair Petersen voted "Aye". Motion carried unanimously.
Member Mazur abstained.
C. CONSENT AGENDA: (Items 1 - 17)
.
1. Case: FLD2002-10034 - 849 Harbor Island * Level 2 Application
Owner/Applicant: Peter Hunt.
Location: 0.26-acres located on the east side of Harbor Island, approximately 500 feet
from the northern terminus of Harbor Island.
Atlas Page: 249B.
Zoning: LMDRlIENCOD, Low Medium Density Residential District/Island Estates
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to terminate the status of a nonconforming structure to
permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot setback
is required, under the provisions of Section 6-109.
Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot rear setback to building.
Neighborhood Association(s): Island Estates Civic Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
*Due to an advertising error, the Community Development Board must rehear this case.
The 0.26-acre site on the east side of Harbor Island, approximately 2,700 feet north of
Harbor Passage is within a neighborhood dominated by single-family dwellings. The site was
developed in 1980 with a single-family dwelling. A two-story addition to the rear of the house
was constructed in 1998 at an 18.5-foot rear/waterfront setback, where a 25-foot setback was
required. The project included major renovation of the rear portion of the existing house and
the addition of the two-story portion, which included a portion over the existing house. The
permit was issued in error. The Planning Department has deemed the structure nonconforming.
The Code requires, under the provisions of Section 6-1 02.F., that, "in the event a
nonconforming structure is destroyed or damaged to 50 percent or more of the assessed value,
the structure may be repaired or restored only if the structure and the use conforms to the
standards of the development code for the zoning district in which it is located."
.
The applicant has applied for Termination of Status as a Nonconformity to allow
reconstruction at the existing 18.5 rear/waterfront setback in the future event the structure is
damaged or destroyed to 50 percent or more of its assessed value. The addition was designed
and constructed with steel rods augered to a depth of 30 feet (bedrock) and anchored for
improved structural support. In the event of damage or destruction, replacement construction
would be required to meet the 25-foot setback. If this 25-foot setback was enforced, it would not
allow for the full utilization of the in-place structural improvements.
Community Development 2003-01
2
1/21/03
.
.
.
A review of Development Orders issued in the immediate area (Harbor Island) has
identified that two previous Development Orders have been granted for reduced rear/waterfront
setbacks. On May 26,2000, a Development Order (FLS 00-03-18) was issued to reduce the
rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, for an addition to a single-family dwelling at 860
Harbor Island for Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. On August 9,2001, a Development Order (FLS 01-
05-37) was issued to reduce the rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 18 feet, for a 1,104
square foot swimming pool at 673 Harbor Island for Mr. and Mrs. Ed Capone.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on November 14, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval for a Termination of
the Status of a Nonconforming Structure to permit an 18.5 feet rear/waterfront setback where a
25 feet setback is required within the Low Medium Density Residential District under the
provisions of Section 6-109.C for the site at 849 Harbor Island, with the following bases for
approval: 1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria to terminate the
status of a nonconforming structure per Section 6-109.C: 2) the proposal is in compliance with
other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3) the development is compatible with the surrounding area.
AND
2. Case: FLD2002-1 0035 - 300 Pine lias Street Level 2 Application
Owner: Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc.
Applicant: Gerald Yates/Morton Plant Hospital Association, Inc.
Representative: Mr. John Powell/King Engineering Associates, Inc.
Location: 59.6-acres generally located on the east and west sides of South Fort Harrison
Avenue, between Jeffords Street to the north and Corbett Street to the south. Portions
of the site are also located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue between
Grand Central to the north and "A" Street to the south (approximately 6.86 acres of the
site is located within City of Belleair and not subject to this application).
Atlas Pages: 295A, 295B, 305A and 305B.
Zoning: I, Institutional District and IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology District.
Request: Flexible Development application to revise a master site plan previously approved by
the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Community Development
Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development
standards as part of the original Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community
Development Board):
. Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pine lias Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing
auxiliary shop )*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing
Powell Cancer Pavilion)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to
pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building)*;
. Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10
feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
3
.
.
.
. Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25
feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*;
. Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*;
. Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*;
. Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet*.
Proposed Use: Changes to an approved Master Plan including improved stormwater facilities,
the addition of property enlarging the campus, the replacement and/or enlargement of seven
Morton Plant received approval of a Master Plan for its 44-acre campus by the City
Commission in 1995, under the regulations of the former Land Development Code. The Master
Plan conceptually identified the placement of the building and parking structures and stormwater
detention facilities. The Community Development Board (CDB) approved, in concept, reduced
parking and building setbacks in October 1999 (case FLD 99-08-12). The CDB later approved a
final site plan in January 2000 (case FLD 99-11-22). That request included a Flexible
Development approval, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with a
reduction in building setback on Jeffords Street (emergency room) from 25 feet to 12.4 feet,
reduction in parking lot setback on Jeffords Street and Reynolds Avenue from 25 feet to five
feet, reduction in the required landscape buffer on Jeffords Street and Reynolds Avenue from
10 feet to five feet; and the vacation of Bay Avenue and Sadler Street rights-of-way (vacated
mid-2000).
The CDB subsequently approved a second set of changes to the Master Plan in October
2002 (case FLD2002-08024). The changes were specific to two area of the campus as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. That included an increase in the height of a
parking garage from 50 feet to 74 feet, a parking lot within the IRT District without a fence or
wall four feet in height along the front (north) property along (Pinellas Street) and along the side
(east) property line, a reduction in the front (north) setback along Pinellas Street from 20 feet to
seven feet (to pavement) and a reduction in the side (east) setback along the Pinellas Trail
right-of-way from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement).
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on September 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development application to revise a master site plan previously approved by the City
Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Community Development Board in
January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development standards as
part of the original Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community Development
Board):
. Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary
shop )*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell
Cancer Pavilion)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building);
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
4
.
.
.
. Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet
(to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet
to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*;
. Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*;
. Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*; and
. Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet, for the
site at 300 Pinellas Street, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-1204.A. and 2-1304.C.;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913;
3. The development is generally consistent with the approved Master Plan; and
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions:
1. Any additional changes to the Master Plan be reviewed by the COB as part of an overall,
new Master Plan amendment or update;
2. All areas within the Master Plan have an Institutional Classification with an Institutional
District designation prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. Specific site plans be submitted for each phase of construction and be consistent with the
Master Plan as approved or altered by the COB;
4. All individual Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits,
occupational licenses and/or certificate of occupancy, as applicable;
5. The final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to
the COB (as part of case FLD2002-08024) or as modified by the COB and be approved by
Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. Landscape plans in association with each phase of the Master Plan be submitted to and
approved by Staff prior to the issuance of permits for that phase;
7. All signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity;
8. All requirements of Florida Fire Prevention Code 2001 be met prior to the issuance of any
permits as applicable to each phase of construction;
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
5
. 9. All required tree permits be obtained prior to the issuance of permits for each phase of
construction;
.
.
10. All required Parks and Recreation Department fees be paid prior to the issuance of any
building permits or plats, whichever come first;
11. All Stormwater requirements for each phase of construction be met prior to the issuance of
any permits pertaining to each phase of construction;
12. All required Transportation Impact Fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy as applicable to each building;
13. Plans showing fully dimensioned layouts of all levels of each proposed parking garage be
submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits for each parking
garage;
14. A revised site plan indicating the driveway on the north side of Pinellas Street as aligned
with the driveway on south side of Pine lias Street be submitted to and approved by Staff
prior to the issuance of any permits.
AND
3. Cases: FLD2002-11 039/PL T2002-11 003 - 620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings I)
Level 2 Application
Owner: Beach Motel Management.
Applicant: The Moorings Townhomes.
Representative: Roland Rogers.
Location: 0.33-acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately
1,300 feet west of Gulf Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the
front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement),
reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement) and
from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to
zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (2) of a six-slip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of
Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
Proposed Use: A six-unit, attached dwelling development with a six-slip, multi-use dock.
Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association and Sand Key Civic Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
The square site is 0.33 acres on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately
1,300 feet west of Gulf Boulevard, along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach, with
frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of
Beach By Design which is a distinctive area of mixed uses, including high rise condominiums,
resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach by Design contemplates this District will be an area
of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of
Clearwater Beach.
Community Development 2003-01
6
1/21/03
. The site is developed with a one- and two-story, L-shaped 14-room motel (plus the
manager's apartment). The building is approximately 20 feet in height. The site has one,
undefined, existing driveway along most of the south property line (Bayway Boulevard), where
parking spaces "back out" into the right-of-way. The site currently is nonconforming with regard
to "back out" parking and front, side and rear setbacks. The site also contains a 10 feet wide
deck that extends the entire width of the property over the water. All existing improvements
(buildings, pavement, walkways and deck) will be removed as part of the site's redevelopment.
The proposal includes constructing a six-unit, three-story townhome building. The
building will contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit
will be approximately 2,400 square feet in area. The parking will include two garage spaces per
unit under the building. The development will operate as and have the characteristics of single-
family homes, including the individual garages. Redevelopment of this site will eliminate the
"back out" parking, providing much safer vehicle maneuvering on-site, with access confined to
two, 24 feet wide driveways.
.
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a
reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), under the
provisions of Section 2-803 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The reduction in
side (east and west) setbacks from 10 to five feet is a function of the unit size and will provide
additional landscaping and a more economically, viable project. The Building Code requires an
18-foot separation between structures and the seawall (the pool is at a 10-foot separation). The
Building Official may review adjustments to this separation.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color (light gray and
sand) stucco, teal color barrel tile roof and a significant number of windows and balconies on all
elevations. The trim and detail color will be white and deep burgundy. The building will also be
articulated with the unit entries protruding from the front fayade and with the center two units set
forward closer to the street than the other units on either side. On the rear of the building, units
will be provided with rooftop decks accessed via spiral staircases for additional outdoor living
areas.
The landscape plan exceeds the Code requirements utilizing a variety of colorful
groundcovers (including lantana and dwarf confederate jasmine), shrubs (including Indian
hawthorn, dwarf oleander and seagrape) and trees (including cabbage palms, washingtonia
palm and tree form oleander). The landscape plan also includes a variety of interesting
specimen plants (including variegated ginger and lily). Additional landscaping will be possible
on the rooftop decks at the rear of the building.
.
The applicant will remove all signs. No new signs are proposed with this development.
Solid waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and
Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
applicant will be selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat
prior to the issuance of building permits. Storm water, water and sewer design standards will be
required to be met prior to building permit issuance.
Community Development 2003-01
7
1/21/03
.
.
.
The applicant will be removing the deck area over the water in the rear (north side). As
part of the redevelopment of this site, the applicant proposes to construct a six-slip multi-use
dock of less than 500 square feet. This dock only requires administrative review (no public
hearing). The proposed dock meets Code provisions. Use of the dock should be for residents
and guests only and not sub-leased.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development request to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool
deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building)
and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and
Preliminary Plat approval for six lots for the site at 620 Bayway Boulevard, with the following
bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1) The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2) Boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
town homes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the town homes;
3) Floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning
boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4) Covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an administrative
level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5) The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards"
be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits;
6) All Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7) All applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
Community Development 2003-01
8
1/21/03
.
8) All storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
In response to a question, Senior Planner Wayne Wells said as indicated in the staff
reports, the items on this Consent Agenda involve either existing docks or proposed docks.
Staff would review any requests for docks over 500 square feet and forward the request to the
CDB (Community Development Board) for review if necessary.
.
AND
4. Cases: FLD2002-11038/PL T2002-11002 - 674 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings II)
Owner: Cotel, Inc.
Applicant: The Moorings Townhomes.
Representative: Roland Rogers.
Location: 0.33-acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 700
feet west of Gulf Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the
front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement),
reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building and pavement) and
from 10 feet to two feet (to pool deck) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to
zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
Proposed Use: A six-unit, attached dwelling development with an existing six-slip multi-use
dock.
Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association and Sand Key Civic Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
The square site is 0.33 acres on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 700
feet west of Gulf Boulevard, along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach with
frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of
Beach By Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses, including high-rise condominiums,
resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach by Design contemplates this District will be an area
of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of
Clearwater Beach.
The site is currently vacant and contains an 11-foot wide deck over the water extending
the full width of the property and a six-slip dock, with the slips leased to non-resident boat
owners. The applicant proposes to discontinue the leases prior to construction of the
townhomes. Use of the dock should be for residents and their guests only and not sub-leased.
.
The proposal includes constructing a six-unit, three-story townhome building. The
building will contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit
will be approximately 2,400 square feet in area. The parking will include two garage spaces per
unit under the building. The development will operate as and have the characteristics of single-
family homes, including the individual garages. Access will be confined to two driveways, 24
feet in width, with on-site vehicular maneuvering area.
Community Development 2003-01
9
1/21/03
.
.
.
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building) and from 10 feet to two feet (to pool deck),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a
reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), under the
provisions of Section 2-803 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The reduction in
side (east and west) setbacks from 10 to five feet is a function of the unit size and will provide
additional landscaping and a more economically, viable project. The Building Code requires an
18-foot separation between structures and the seawall (the pool is at a 10-foot separation). The
Building Official may review adjustments to this separation.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color (light gray and
sand) stucco, teal color barrel tile roof and a significant number of windows and balconies on all
elevations. The trim and detail color will be white and deep burgundy. The building will also be
articulated with the unit entries protruding from the front fa<;ade and with the center, two units
set forth closer to the street than the other units on either side. On the rear of the building, units
will be provided with rooftop decks accessed via spiral staircases for additional outdoor living
areas.
The landscape plan exceeds the Code requirements utilizing a variety of colorful
groundcovers (including lantana and dwarf confederate jasmine), shrubs (including Indian
hawthorn, dwarf oleander and seagrape) and trees (including cabbage palms, washingtonia
palm and tree form oleander). The landscape plan also includes a variety of interesting
specimen plants (including variegated ginger and lily). Additional landscaping will be possible
on the rooftop decks at the rear of the building.
No signs are proposed with this development. Solid waste will be removed via black
barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and Recreation fees will be required to be paid
prior to the issuance of any building permits. The applicant will be selling the units fee simple,
which includes land, and will record a Final Plat prior to the issuance of building permits.
Additionally, storm water, water and sewer design standards will be required to be met prior to
building permit issuance.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development request to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to three feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and from 10 feet to two feet (to pool
deck), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building)
and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and
Preliminary Plat approval for six lots for the site at 674 Bayway Boulevard, with the following
bases and conditions:
Bases for Aooroval:
1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
10
. 3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Aooroval:
1) The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2) Boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
town homes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the town homes;
3) Floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning
boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4) Covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an administrative
level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5) The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards"
be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits;
6) All Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
.
7) All applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8) All storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
AND
5. Case: FLD2002-110421PL T2002-11005 -161 Brightwater Drive Level 2 Application
Owner/Applicant: Brightwater Investment Establishment.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Location: 0.47 acres located on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 800
feet east of Hamden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with
reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six
feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to
18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots.
Proposed Use: A 10-unit, attached dwelling development.
Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
.
The rectangular site is 0.47 acres on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately
800 feet east of Hamden Drive, and is currently vacant. It is located along a highly developed
Community Development 2003-01
11
1/21/03
.
.
.
area within Clearwater Beach and has frontage along Clearwater Bay, within the Small Motel
District of Beach By Design, which provides for the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with
town homes and timeshares between two and four stories above parking.
The proposal includes constructing a 1 O-unit three-story town home building. The
building will contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit
will be approximately 3,000 square feet in area, including the ground floor garage/storage area.
An additional 460 square feet is within lanais. The parking under the building will include two
garage spaces per unit. Unit driveways will be paired in the middle (21-foot wide), whereas the
end units will have a singlewide driveway (nine feet wide). The design requires that cars back
out into the right-of-way to exit the site. The Community Development Code prohibits "back out"
parking for any uses other than detached dwellings. The driveway length will permit a vehicle to
completely "back out" of the garage, thus eliminating the garage walls as a potential view
obstruction of the sidewalk and street. The development will operate as, and have the
characteristics of, single-family detached homes, including the individual garages. The site is
located on Brightwater Drive, which is a cul-de-sac street approximately 1,600 in length and
generally used only by persons with a destination on the street. From a traffic standpoint, this
concept of "back out" parking for town homes may be acceptable on a low volume cul-de-sac
street such as this. It should not be considered, however, as a precedent for deviation from the
Code provision of restricting "back out" movement into the right-of-way for single-family
residential uses only, and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of
the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from
10 feet to six feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18
feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The reductions in side
setback is a function of the unit size and will provide additional landscaping and a more
economically, viable project. The reduction in the rear setback for the building is due to the
irregular shape of the property. The southwest corner of the building exceeds the minimum
setback (21 feet), whereas the southeast corner is at a 18-foot setback. The rear setback
reduction is otherwise to provide pedestrian access to the water and future docks.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color (taupe) stucco,
white barrel tile roof, a number of windows on all elevations and balconies on both the rear of
the second and third floors. The trim and detail (banding) color will be white. The building will
also be articulated with the second-floor unit entries recessed from the front fayade and
accessed from the ground/first floor by individual stairs. On the rear of the building, units will be
provided with rooftop decks accessed via spiral staircases for additional outdoor living areas.
The landscape plan meets the Code requirements, utilizing a variety of a colorful
groundcover (lantana), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn and viburnam) and trees (including
washingtonia palms, magnolia, Spanish cherry and crape myrtle). Additional landscaping will
be possible on the rooftop decks at the rear of the building. Landscaping between the
driveways may not accommodate the amount and/or types of landscaping proposed. The
landscape plan should be modified and/or clarified prior to the issuance of building permits.
Solid waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and
Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
applicant will be selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat
Community Development 2003-01
12
1/21/03
.
.
.
prior to the issuance of building permits. No docks are proposed at this time. Future docks over
500 square feet will require Flexible Development Level Two approval through the Community
Development Board.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development application for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from
10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet
(to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed
to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots for the site at 161
Brightwater Drive, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C.
2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1) The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2) The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boatyards"
be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits;
3) All Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
4) All applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5) All storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits; and
6) A revised landscape plan, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, be submitted prior
to the issuance.
AND
6.
Case: FLD2002-11041/PL T2002-11004 - 656 Bayway Boulevard Level 2 Application
Owner: Gus DiGiovanni.
Applicant: Bayway Townhomes, LLC.
Representative: Roland Rogers, Rogers Beach Development.
Community Development 2003-01
13
1/21/03
.
.
.
Location: 0.67 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 800
feet west of Gulf Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the
front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building), a
reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), under the provisions
of Section 2-803.C; and (2) for a 10-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601;
and Preliminary Plat approval for 11 lots.
Proposed Use: An 11-unit, attached dwelling project with 10 docks.
Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association and Sand Key Civic Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
The rectangular site is 0.67 acres on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately
800 feet west of Gulf Boulevard, along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach and
has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District
of Beach By Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses, including high-rise
condominiums, resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach by Design contemplates this District
will be an area of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on
the balance of Clearwater Beach.
The site is developed with a two-story, V-shaped, 40-room motel (Howard Johnson).
The existing building is approximately 20 feet in height. The site has one, undefined, existing
driveway along most of the south property line (Bayway Boulevard), where parking spaces
"back out" into the right-of-way. The site is currently nonconforming with regard to "back out"
parking and front, side and rear setbacks. The site also contains a small dock on the north side.
All existing improvements (buildings, pavement, walkways and dock) will be removed as part of
the site's redevelopment.
The proposal includes constructing an 11-unit, three-story townhome building. The
building will contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit
will be approximately 2,250 square feet in area (not including the garage or the rooftop deck).
The parking will include two garage spaces per unit. The development will operate as and have
the characteristics of single-family homes, including the individual garages. Redevelopment of
this site will eliminate the back out parking, providing much safer vehicle maneuvering on-site in
a one-way traffic flow, with access confined to two, 16-foot wide driveways (entrance on north
side; exit on south side).
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a
reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), under the provisions
of Section 2-803 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The reduction in side
setbacks from 10 to seven (east) and five (west) feet is a function of the unit size and the desire
to cant the units on a slight angle producing a "saw tooth" fa9ade for visual interest, providing
additional landscaping and a more economically viable project. The Building Code requires an
18-foot separation between structures and the seawall (the pool is at a 10-foot separation). The
Building Official may review adjustments to this separation.
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
14
. The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color (putty white and
butter beige) stucco, "Florida" blend (multi-color) color barrel tile roof and a significant number of
windows and balconies on all elevations. The trim and detail color will be white and mahogany
red. The building will also be articulated with the unit entries protruding from the front fayade
and with the end units having bay windows on the second and third floors. On the rear of the
building, units will be provided with rooftop decks accessed via spiral staircases for additional
outdoor living areas.
.
.
The landscape plan exceeds the Code requirements, utilizing a variety of colorful
groundcovers (including lantana, lirope and sea grape), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn,
viburnam and podacarpus) and trees (including cabbage palms, tree form ligustrum and tree
form oleander). The landscape plan also includes a variety of interesting specimen plants
(including cardboard palms and lily). Additional landscaping will be possible on the rooftop
decks at the rear of the building.
The applicant will remove all signs. No new signs are proposed with this development.
Solid waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and
Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
applicant will be selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat
prior to the issuance of building permits.
Section 3-601.C.3 of the Code requires docks over 500 square feet in area (in
association with a multi-family development or condominium) be treated as a commercial dock
and be approved as part of a level Two, Flexible Development review. The applicant proposes
to remove the small, existing dock on the north side. As part of the redevelopment of this site,
the applicant proposes to construct a 10-slip, 1,422.5 square-foot, multi-use dock for the
exclusive use of residents and/or guests of the town home development. Sub-leasing these
docks will not be allowed. The proposed dock includes a 30 feet long walkout from the seawall
to avoid existing sea grasses, which will include handrails to prevent docking. The dock will
extend a total of 56.4 feet from the seawall, which is significantly less than the maximum
allowable of 182.5 feet (75 percent of waterfront lot width). The proposed dock should not
constitute a navigational hazard, as the proposed length represents a maximum of 8.4 percent
of the waterway width (maximum of 25 percent allowed). The proposed dock will be 182.5 feet
in width, which is less than the 184.5 feet width allowed. The dock will be set back 30.7 feet
(east) and 32.7 feet (west) from the extended property lines, which is greater than the minimum
setback of 24.6 feet.
Prior to the issuance of building permits for the docks, the applicant will need to show
compliance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards for "marinas and
boat yards" for the construction and operation of the docking facilities to provide fire protection of
boats moored in the slips. Floating and dock supported signage will need to be permanently
installed warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity.
Lighting on the end of the dock should be installed to enhance navigation safety.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development request (1) to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction
of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement and building) and a
Community Development 2003-01
15
1/21/03
.
.
.
reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to walkway), as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (2) for a
10-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601; and Preliminary Plat approval for
11 lots for the site at 656 Bayway Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Aooroval:
1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Aooroval:
1) The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2) Boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
town homes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the town homes;
3) Floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning
boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
4) Covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an administrative
level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
5) The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards"
be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits;
6) All Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
7) All applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks; and
8) All storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits.
AND
7.
Case: FLD2002-11043 - 692 Bayway Boulevard Leve/2 Application
Owner: Burnaby Welch Corporation.
Applicant/Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Location: 0.51 acres located on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 600
feet west of Gulf Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
16
.
.
.
Request: Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front
(south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet
to nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment
room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and
an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood elevation),
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C.
Proposed Use: A 15-unit, attached dwelling development with an existing 11-slip dock.
Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association and Sand Key Civic Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
The site is 0.51 acres on the north side of Bayway Boulevard, approximately 600 feet
west of Gulf Boulevard, along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach and has
frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District of
Beach By Design, which is a distinctive area of mixed uses including high rise condominiums,
resort hotels and commercial uses. Beach By Design contemplates this District will be an area
of strategic revitalization and renovation in response to improving conditions on the balance of
Clearwater Beach.
The site is developed with a 24-room overnight accommodation use. The site contains
an 11-slip dock, with the slips currently leased to non-resident boat owners. The developer
proposes to discontinue the leases prior to construction of the attached dwellings (condos). Use
of the dock will be for residents and their guests only and not sub-leased.
The proposal includes constructing a 15-unit, four-story attached dwelling, with three
floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit will be approximately
1,750 square feet in area. The parking under the building will include 29 spaces, 1.93 spaces
per unit. Development of this site will confine access to a single, 24 feet wide driveway with on-
site vehicular maneuvering area.
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of
the front (south) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from
15 feet to nine feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet
(to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment
room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway),
under the provisions of Section 2-803 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The
reduction in side (east and west) setbacks and the front setback is a function of the unit size,
width of the proposed pool and the slight irregular shape of the property in order to provide
additional landscaping and a more economically, viable project. The reduction of the rear
setback is due to the desire to have a sidewalk accessing the boat slips and an adequate pool
deck area. The Building Code requires an 18-foot separation between structures and the
seawall (the pool is at a 10-foot separation). The Building Official may review adjustments to
this separation.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include taupe (for most of the
building) and rust (stairwells and elevator) stucco, variegated red barrel tile roof and a significant
number of windows on all elevations. Units will have balconies on the rear (north) side of the
building. The trim and detail color will be white and off white. Railings on the front and rear will
be white. The building will also be articulated with the unit entries recessed slightly from the
Community Development 2003-01
17
1/21/03
.
.
.
front fa9ade (south side). Stairwells are located on both the southeast and southwest corners of
the building, with an elevator located approximately on the center of the building fa9ade.
The landscape plan meets the requirements of Code utilizing a variety of colorful
groundcovers (including lantana, varigated arboricola, dwarf bouganvilla and dwarf confederate
jasmine), shrubs (including dwarf oleander and seagrape) and trees (including reclinata, sabal,
coconut and washingtonia palms and crape myrtle). While the landscape plan meets Code,
modifications are necessary prior to the issuance of building permits to better clarify planting
areas and improve side yard landscaping/buffering. The landscape plan should also locate and
clarify the preservation or removal of existing trees.
No signs are proposed with this development. A dumpster is provided for solid waste
located next to the elevator on the south side of the building and is accessed by the trash truck
from Bayway Boulevard by its own driveway. Gates for this dumpster enclosure must be 12 feet
in open width to provide for truck access. All required Parks and Recreation fees will be
required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. Additionally, storm water, water
and sewer design standards will be required to be met prior to building permit issuance.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south) setback from
15 feet to five feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to nine feet (to
stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pool equipment room), from 10
feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C for the site at 692 Bayway
Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Aooroval:
1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3) The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Aooroval:
1) The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2) A Unity of Title be recorded tying all lots together as one lot prior to the issuance of building
permits;
3) Boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the condominiums;
Community Development 2003-01
18
1/21/03
.
.
.
4) Floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning
boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity;
5) Covered boat lifts be prohibited (uncovered boat lifts may be reviewed at an administrative
level provided that all requirements of Section 3-601 are met);
6) The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards"
be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits;
7) All Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
8) All applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
9) All storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met
prior to the issuance of building permits;
1 0) The dumpster enclosure meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Department prior to the
issuance of building permits; and
11) The landscape plan be modified to clarify planting areas, improve side yard
landscaping/buffering and clarify the preservation or removal of existing trees.
AND
8. Case: FLD2002-10033 -1091 Eldorado Avenue Leve/2 Application
Owner/Applicant: Carlouel Yacht Club.
Representative: Robert Thompson.
Location: The 2.9-acre site is located on the east side of Eldorado Avenue,
approximately 150 feet north of Bay Esplanade.
Atlas Page: 227 A & 238A.
Zoning: I, Institutional District.
Request: Flexible Development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by
250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from
221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601.
Proposed use: A 1 O-foot wide by 250-foot long floating dock (adjacent to seawall).
Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
The 2.9-acre site is on the east side of Eldorado Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of
Bay Esplanade. The site is developed with the Carlouel Yacht Club. The surrounding area is
characterized by single-family dwellings. The site contains a dock of 12 slips, approximately in
the center of the waterfront property.
The applicant seeks to construct a floating dock adjacent to the seawall along the
northern portion of their property for use by members and guests of the Carlouel Yacht Club to
moor their boats while visiting the Club. The 10-foot long by 250-foot wide floating dock will be
located so that moored boats will be no closer than 14 feet from the seawall. This floating dock
will only be used for transient mooring, not for permanent mooring of vessels. This area is
currently used for the anchorage of vessels. The floating dock will enable more members of the
Club to safely moor their vessels to a dock for accessing the upland land area of the Club,
Community Development 2003-01
19
1/21/03
.
.
.
rather than having to anchor their vessels and use a small boat to ferry persons over to the
existing dock to access the site. Approximately 18-20 mooring spaces will be available with the
floating dock, based on the average boat size of 30 feet (bow to stern plus space between
vessels). The proposed dock will replace the existing tie pilings farther from the existing seawall
than the proposed dock. The proposed dock is proportionally compatible with the other docks
within the neighborhood. There will be no adverse impact upon the recreational or commercial
use of the waterway and the dock does not impose any navigational hazards. Studies provided
by the applicant do not indicate any evidence of marine sea grass within the area of the
proposed floating dock.
Since the Club is adjacent to single-family dwellings the commercial dock is required to
locate within the center one-third of the property. The applicant is requesting a setback
reduction on the north side from 221.67 feet to six feet for the proposed floating dock. The
single-family lot directly to the north does not have the physical dwelling on it, rather it is on the
west side of Eldorado Avenue and their dock is on the east side of Eldorado Avenue. The dock
for the single-family lot to the south is at an approximate zero setback to the common property
line. The proposed dock (including the existing fixed slips) is proportional to its upland
waterfront lot width, in harmony with the scale and character of the surrounding single-family
docks.
Prior to the issuance of building permits for the floating dock, the applicant will need to
show compliance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards for "marinas and
boat yards" for the construction and operation of the docking facilities to provide fire protection of
boats moored at this floating dock and the existing dock. Plans prepared and sealed by a
professional engineer will be required for issuance of a building permit. Floating and dock
supported signage will need to be permanently installed warning boaters of the existence of
protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity.
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials
on November 14, 2002. The Planning Department recommends approval of the Flexible
Development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet long by 250 feet wide
floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in the side (north) setback from
221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601 for the site at 1091 Eldorado
Avenue, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Aooroval:
1) The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria under the provisions of Section
3-601.
2) The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria per Section 3-913.
3) The dock development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Aooroval:
1) The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards"
be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department for new and existing docks prior to the
issuance of building permits. Plans prepared and sealed by a professional engineer must be
submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new dock;
Community Development 2003-01
20
1/21/03
. 2) The floating dock be for the exclusive use by members and guests of the Carlouel Yacht
Club, that boats moored be transient and that there be no commercial activities at the docks
(bait sales, vending, etc.); and
3) Floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning
boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity.
In response to a question, Mr. Wells said this floating dock is 10 feet long and 250 feet
wide along the seawall. Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani said the length is measured out from
the seawall and the width is measured along the seawall.
AND
.
9. Case: ANX2002-10017 - 1740 Ragland Avenue Leve/3 Application
Owner/Applicant: Charlotte Sue Sisko
Location: 0.15-acres located on the west side of Ragland Avenue, approximately 1,900
feet south of Sunset Point Road and 450 feet east of Belcher Road.
Atlas Page: 263A.
Request:
a) Annexation of 0.15 acres to the City of Clearwater;
b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL, Residential Low
Classification (City of Clearwater); and
c) Rezoning from R-3, Single Family Residential District (County) to LMDR, Low Medium
Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Neighborhood Association(s): Coachman Ridge Homeowners Association and Alcove
Homeowners Association, Inc.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
The subject property at 1740 Ragland Avenue is on the west side, approximately 1,900
feet south of Sunset Point Road, 450 feet east of Belcher Road and 450 feet north of S. Lagoon
Circle. The applicant is requesting this annexation to receive City sewer service. The property
is contiguous with the existing City boundaries to the south, east and west; therefore, the
proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It
is proposed that the abutting right-of-way also be annexed. The subject site is approximately
0.15 acres in area and is occupied by a single-family detached dwelling. It is proposed that the
properties have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning
category of LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including
sanitary sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse
effect on the service level. The applicant paid the applicable sanitary sewer impact fee and
assessment and will be responsible for the required utility deposit and any costs associated with
connecting the subject property to the City sewer system.
.
The proposed annexation and existing use are consistent with both the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as
well as goals and policies. The existing and future use of this site as a single-family dwelling is
consistent with the LMDR zoning district. The proposed annexation is consistent with Florida
law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is
Community Development 2003-01
21
1/21/03
.
compact in concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following
actions on the request: 1) Approval of the annexation of the property located at 1740 Ragland
Avenue; 2) approval of the Residential Low (RL) category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive
Plan; and 3) approval of the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential zoning district pursuant to
the City's Community Development Code.
AND
.
10. Case: ANX2002-11022 - 2316 Drew Street Level 3 Application
Owner/Applicant: Drew Park, LLC.
Representative: Emerson Atkinson.
Location: 0.83-acres located on the north side of Drew Street and east side of Anna
Avenue, approximately 1,500 feet east of Belcher Road.
Atlas Page: 281A.
Request: Annexation of 0.83-acres to the City of Clearwater.
Proposed Use: Future office development.
Neighborhood Association(s): No affected association.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
buildings and the addition of three parking garages.
Neighborhood Association(s): Lennox Place, Main St. Apartments, Hidden Oak, Barbie Towers
Neighborhood Association, South Clearwater Citizens for Progressive Action, and Harbor Oaks
Homeowners Association.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
This annexation involves one (1) parcel of vacant building on the north side of Drew
Street and east side of Anna Avenue, approximately 1,500 feet east of Belcher Road. The
property is approximately 36,154 square feet or 0.83 acres in area. The property is contiguous
with the City boundaries to the north, south, and east; therefore, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation.
A companion application to change the Future Land Use Plan category of this site from
Commercial General (CG) to Residential/Office General (R10G), and to rezone it from C-2,
General Commercial (County) to the 0, Office District is being processed concurrently with this
annexation request in LUZ2002-11 012 (See agenda Item #C3).
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including water,
sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on
the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive
Plan and is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency
with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the
annexation of the property located at 2316 Drew Street.
AND
11.
Case: LUZ2002-11012 - 2316 Drew Street
Level 3 Application
.
Community Development 2003-01
22
1/21/03
.
.
.
Owner/Applicant: Drew Park, LLC.
Representative: Emerson Atkinson.
Location: 0.83-acres located on the north side of Drew Street and east site of Anna
Avenue, approximately 1,500 feet east of Belcher Road.
Atlas Page: 281A.
Request:
(a) Land Use Plan amendment from Commercial General, CG to the Residential/Office
General, RlOG Classification; and
(b) Rezoning from C-2, General Commercial (County) to the 0, Office District.
Proposed Use: Future office development.
Neighborhood Association(s): No affected association.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
This Future Land Use Plan amendment and rezoning application involves one parcel of
land, approximately 0.83 acres in area, occupied by a vacant vehicle sales and service lot. It
has a Future Land Use Plan designation of Commercial General (CG) and a zoning
classification of C-2, General Commercial (County). The applicant is requesting to amend the
Future Land Use Plan designation to the Residential/Office General (RlOG) classification and to
rezone it to the 0, Office District to develop the property in conjunction with the applicant's
adjacent parcels to the east. If approved, the site will be incorporated into the proposed Drew
Professional Park, consisting of a total of ten (10), one-story office structures and accessory
parking lots, with two of the proposed structures located on the subject site. A companion
application to annex the property into the City of Clearwater is being processed concurrently
with this land use plan and rezoning amendment (Case #ANX2002-11 022).
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject
to the approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as
the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the size of the plan amendment request, review
and approval by Florida Department of Community Affairs is not required.
An amendment of the Future Land Use Plan from Commercial General (CG) to
Residential/Office General (RlOG) and a rezoning from C, Commercial, to the 0, Office District
for the subject site is requested to incorporate these properties into the proposed Drew
Professional Park. The subject site exceeds the minimum requirements for the existing and
proposed use of the property as office space. The neighborhood is surrounded by single-family
residential dwellings to the north and south and vehicle service to the west and an office use to
the east. The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will be compatible with the existing
neighborhood and consolidate Drew Park, LLC's holdings and uses into the appropriate land
use category and zoning district.
The proposed Residential/Office General (RlOG) Future Land Use classification and 0,
Office zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans,
is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public
services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development
regulations of the City.
Community Development 2003-01
23
1/21/03
.
The Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions on this
application: 1) Amend the Future land Use Plan designation of 2316 Drew Street from
Commercial General (CG) to Residential/Office General (R10G), and 2) amend the Zoning
District designation of 2316 Drew Street from C-2, General Commercial (County) to the 0,
Office District.
AND
.
12. Case: ANX2002-11 019 - 1720 Overbrook Avenue Level 3 Application
Owner/Applicant: City of Clearwater, Public Works Administration.
Representative: Elliott Shoberg, PE, Civil Engineer II.
location: 11.9B-acres located on the south side of Overbrook Avenue, between Douglas
Avenue and North Betty lane.
Atlas Page: 260B.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 11.9B-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) land Use Plan amendment from Commercial General, CG (County), Residential/Office
General, R10G (County) and Preservation, P (County) to Commercial General, CG (City
of Clearwater), Residential/Office General, R10G (City of Clearwater) and Preservation,
P (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from Al, Aquatic lands (County), C-3, Wholesale, Warehousing & Industrial
Support (County), M-2, Manufacturing & Industry (County) and P-1, Professional Offices
(County) to C, Commercial District and 0, Office(Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Future fire station and park.
Neighborhood Association(s): Brentwood Estates, Old Clearwater Bay Homeowners
Association and Drew Park Plaza Homeowners Association.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
The subject property at 1720 Overbrook Avenue is approximately 11.9B acres in area,
on the south side, between Douglas Avenue and North Betty lane. The City of Clearwater is
requesting this annexation to provide sanitary sewer and water service to the site in order to
support construction of a new City fire station and nature park. The abutting right-of-way along
Overbrook Avenue also is included in this annexation request. A vehicle salvage yard, three
vehicle service uses, and open space occupy the site. The property is contiguous with the
existing City boundaries to the east and south and will not create an enclave; therefore, the
proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It
is proposed that the properties have a Future land Use Plan designation of Commercial
General (CG), Residential/Office/General (R10G) and Preservation (P) and zoning categories of
C, Commercial, 0, Office and P, Preservation.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including
sanitary sewer, water, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any
adverse effect on the service level. The City is aware of the costs of providing sewer and water
service to this property.
.
The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive Plan and the
Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future land Use Map as well as goals and policies.
The proposed uses are also permitted in the proposed zoning districts. The proposed
annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency
with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration.
Community Development 2003-01
24
1/21/03
.
.
.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following
actions on the request: 1) Approval of the annexation of the property located at 1720 Overbrook
Avenue; 2) approval of the Commercial General (CG), Residential/Office General (R10G) and
Preservation (P) categories pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 3) approval of the
C, Commercial, 0, Office and P, Preservation zoning districts pursuant to the City's Community
Development Code.
AND
13. Case: ANX2002-11020 - 3311 66th Street Leve/3 Application
Owner/Applicant: George E. Pappas.
Representative: Anthony Ciccotti.
Location: 1.88-acres located on the east side of 66th Street, approximately 2,800 feet
south of Curlew Road and 700 feet west of Northridge Drive.
Atlas Page: 178A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 1.88-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Low, RL (County), to Residential Low, RL
(City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from A-E, Agricultural Estate Residential (County) to LDR, Low Density
Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Future single-family subdivision.
Neighborhood Association(s): No affected association.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
The subject property at 3311 66th Street is approximately 1.88 acres in area, on the east
side, approximately 2,800 feet south of Curlew Road, 700 feet west of Northridge Drive and
1,200 feet northwest of Countryside Boulevard. The applicant is requesting this annexation to
receive City sewer and water service to develop the property as a single-family residential
subdivision. A single-family dwelling occupies this site. The property is contiguous with the
existing City boundaries to the north, south and east; therefore, the proposed annexation is
consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It is proposed that the
property have a Future Land Use Plan designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning
category of LDR, Low Density Residential.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including
sanitary sewer, water, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any
adverse effect on the service level. The applicant is aware of the costs associated with
extending City sewer and water service to the subject site.
The proposed annexation and existing use are consistent with both the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Pinellas Planning Council's Countywide Plan with regard to both
the Future Land Use Map as well as goals and policies. The proposed use of this site as a
single-family residential subdivision is consistent with the LDR zoning district. Finally, the
proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its
adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following
actions on the request: 1) Approval of the annexation of the property located at 3311 66th Street;
2) approval of the Residential Low (RL) category pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan;
and 3) approval of the LDR, Low Density Residential zoning district pursuant to the City's
Community Development 2003-01
25
1/21/03
.
Community Development Code.
AND
14. Case: ANX2002-11021 -1231 South Lincoln Avenue Leve/3 Application
Owner/Applicant: Ana Ramirez Diaz.
Representative: Chris Howell.
Location: 0.15-acres located on the east side of South Lincoln Avenue, approximately
360 feet south of Jeffords Street and 650 feet east of Missouri Avenue.
Atlas Page: 306B.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.15-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from Commercial General, CG (County), to Commercial
General, CG (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-4, One, Two & Three Family Residential (County) to C, Commercial
District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Future parking lot to support applicant's adjacent commercial use.
Neighborhood Association(s): Sunshine Tower Apartment Homeowners Association.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner
.
The subject property at 1231 South Lincoln Avenue is approximately 0.15 acres in area,
on the east side, approximately 360 feet south of Jeffords Street and 650 feet east of Missouri
Avenue. The site is occupied by an unimproved surface parking lot and the applicant is
requesting this annexation in order to satisfy the parking requirements for the existing
commercial uses to the north and south. The property is contiguous with the City boundaries to
the north, south, and west; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida
Statutes with regard to voluntary annexation. It is proposed that the properties have a Future
Land Use Plan designation of Commercial General (CG) and a zoning category of C,
Commercial.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including
sanitary sewer, water, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any
adverse effect on the service level. At this time, however, water and sewer services are not
needed for this parking lot.
The proposed annexation and existing use are consistent with both the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Countywide Plan both with regard to the Future Land Use Map as
well as goals and policies. The existing and proposed use of this site as a parking lot to serve
an adjacent use is consistent with the C zoning district. The property owner has filed a Unity of
Title joining the subject property with the abutting sites to avoid creating a nonconforming lot.
Finally, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation
through its adjacency with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends the following
actions on the request: 1) Approval of the annexation of the property located at 1231 South
Lincoln Avenue; 2) approval of the Commercial General (CG) category pursuant to the City's
Comprehensive Plan; and 3) approval of the C, Commercial zoning district pursuant to the City's
Community Development Code.
. AND
Community Development 2003-01
26
1/21/03
.
.
.
15. Case: lUZ2002-11011 - 202 Windward Passage Leve/3 Application
Owner/Applicant: High and Dry Marina, Inc.
Representative: Harry S. Cline, Esquire.
location: 1.838-acres located on the north side of Windward Passage, approximately
600 feet north of Memorial Causeway and 920 feet west of Island Way.
Atlas Page: 267B.
Request:
(a) land Use Plan amendment from Commercial General, CG to the Residential High, RH
Classification; and
(b) Rezoning from the C, Commercial District to the HDR, High Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: Future multi-family dwellings.
Neighborhood Association(s): Island Estates Civic Association.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
This item was pulled from the Consent Agenda. See page 29.
AND
16. Case: ANX2002-12023 -107 Hampton Road Leve/3 Application
Owners: Hampton Road Development Corp. & Limited Properties, Inc.
Applicant: Hampton Road Development Corp.
Representative: Chris Scherer.
location: 0.69-acres located 100 feet east of Hampton Road, approximately 280 feet
north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 291 B.
Request: Annexation of 0.69-acres to the City of Clearwater
Proposed Use: Future office building and parking lot.
Neighborhood Association(s): No affected association.
Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, long Range Planning Manager.
This annexation request involves two parcels of vacant land, approximately 0.65 acres in
area, generally located 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and 100 feet east of Hampton
Road. These properties are part of a 4.22-acre development site that was annexed and
designated Residential/Office Limited (RlOl) on the Future land Use Plan Map and zoned to
the 0, Office District (cases ANX 02-02-02 and lUZ 02-02-02) by the Clearwater City
Commission on June 6, 2002. The applicant planned to construct two office buildings on this
site and one building would house the Hooter's corporate headquarter.
Upon recordation of the annexation, it was determined that the legal description used in
conjunction with the annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning ordinances did not
fully describe the subject properties. The legal descriptions have been corrected and have been
resubmitted for approval. At the December 17, 2002 meeting, the Community Development
Board approved the site plan for the Hooter's office development (FlD2002-09037) with the
condition that this annexation and the proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning
associated with lUZ2002-12013 be finalized prior to the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for the Hooter's new corporate headquarter.
The properties are contiguous with the City boundaries to the north, south, east and
west; therefore, the proposed annexation is consistent with Florida Statutes with regard to
voluntary annexation.
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
27
.
.
.
The proposed annexation can be served by City of Clearwater services, including water,
sewer, solid waste, police, fire and emergency medical services without any adverse effect on
the service level. The proposed annexation is consistent with both the City's Comprehensive
Plan and is consistent with Florida law regarding municipal annexation through its adjacency
with existing City boundaries and is compact in concentration.
Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends approval of the
annexation of the properties located at 107 Hampton Road.
AND
17. Case: LUZ2002-12013 -107 Hampton Road Level 3 Application
Owners: Hampton Road Development Corp. & Limited Properties, Inc.
Applicant: Hampton Road Development Corp.
Representative: Chris Scherer.
Location: 0.69-acres located 100 feet east of Hampton Road, approximately 280 feet
north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 291 B.
Request:
(a) Land Use Plan amendment from Residential Urban, RU to the Residential/Office
Limited, RlOL Classification; and
(b) Rezoning from AE, Agriculture Estate Residential (County) to the 0, Office District (City).
Proposed Use: Future office building and parking lot.
Neighborhood Association(s): No affected association.
Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
This land use plan amendment and rezoning request involves two parcels of vacant
land, approximately 0.65 acres in area, located 280 feet north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard and 100
feet east of Hampton Road. These properties are part of a 4.22-acre development site that was
annexed and designated Residential/Office Limited (RlOL) on the Future Land Use Plan Map
and zoned to the 0, Office District (cases ANX 02-02-02 and LUZ 02-02-02) by the Clearwater
City Commission on June 6, 2002. The applicant planned to construct two office buildings on
this site and one building would house the Hooter's corporate headquarter.
Upon recordation of the annexation, it was determined that the legal description used in
conjunction with the annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning ordinances did not
fully describe the subject properties. The legal descriptions have been corrected and have been
resubmitted for approval. At the December 17, 2002 meeting, the Community Development
Board approved the site plan for the Hooter's office development (FLD2002-09037) with the
condition that this proposed land use plan amendment and rezoning and the annexation
associated with ANX2002-12023 (agenda item C-8) be finalized prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy for the Hooter's new corporate headquarter.
The proposed Residential/Office Limited (RlOL) Future Land Use Plan classification and
0, Office zoning district are consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive
Plans, are compatible with the surrounding area, do not negatively affect the provision of public
services, are compatible with the natural environment and are consistent with the development
regulations of the City. Furthermore, the proposed office use will blend into the existing
neighborhood and serve as a transition/buffer between more intensive commercial uses to the
south and low medium density residential uses to the east and north.
Community Development 2003-01
1/21/03
28
.
The Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions on this
application:
1. Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of Metes and Bounds parcels 13/04
& and portion of 13/044 from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential/Office Limited
(RlOL) (pending case ANX 2002-12023).
2. Amend the Zoning District designation of Metes and Bounds parcels 13/04 & a
portion of 13/044 from A-E, Agricultural Estates Residential to 0, Office (pending
ANX 2002-12023).
In response to a question, Planner Marc Mariano said this address is correct. It was
changed by the Engineering department because 7 Hampton Road was assigned to the former
homeowner, who was not annexed into the City and 10 Hampton Road is not available.
.
Member Mazur moved to approve the Consent Agenda Item C1 - Case FLD2002-
10034, Item C2 - Case FLD2002-10035 with 14 conditions as listed, Item C3 - Cases
FLD2002-11039/PT2002-11003 with 8 conditions as listed, Item C4 - Cases FLD2002-
11038/PL T2002-11002 with 8 conditions as listed, Item C5 - Case FLD2002-11042/PL T2002-
11005 with 6 conditions as listed, Item C6 - Case FLD2002-11 041/PL T2002-11 004 with 8
conditions as listed, Item C7 - Case FLD2002-11 043 with 11 conditions as listed, Item C8 -
Case FLD2002-10033 with 3 conditions as listed, and recommend approval of Consent Agenda
Item C9 - Case ANX2002-10017, Item C10 - Case ANX2002-11022, Item C11 - Case
LUZ2002-11012, Item C12 - Case ANX2002-11019, Item C13 - Case ANX2002-11020, Item
C14 - Case ANX2002-11021, Item C16 - Case ANX2002-12023, and Item C17 - Case
LUZ2002-12013, less Item #15 - Case LUZ2002-11011. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
15. Case: LUZ2002-11 011 - 202 Windward Passage Level 3 Application
Owner/Applicant: High and Dry Marina, Inc.
Representative: Harry S. Cline, Esquire.
Location: 1.838-acres located on the north side of Windward Passage, approximately
600 feet north of Memorial Causeway and 920 feet west of Island Way.
Atlas Page: 267B.
Request:
(c) Land Use Plan amendment from Commercial General, CG to the Residential High, RH
Classification; and
(d) Rezoning from the C, Commercial District to the HDR, High Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: Future multi-family dwellings.
Neighborhood Association(s): Island Estates Civic Association.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
This item was pulled from the Consent Agenda.
Member Hooper declared a conflict of interest.
.
The 1.83-acre subject site at 202 Windward Passage, approximately 500 feet north of
Memorial Causeway and 920 feet west of Island Way, is occupied by a high and dry storage
marina facility containing 306 berths with eight dock structures used for storing, maintaining and
repairing vessels. The applicant is proposing to amend the Future Land Use Plan designation
of this property from the Commercial General (CG) category to the Residential High (RH)
Community Development 2003-01
29
1/21/03
.
category and to rezone it from the C, Commercial District to the HDR, High Density Residential
District to redevelop the property with multi-family dwellings.
In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject
to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the
Countywide Planning Authority. Due to the density allowed by this plan amendment, review and
approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is required.
An amendment to the Future Land Use Plan from Commercial General (CG) to
Residential High (RH) and a rezoning from the C, Commercial District to the HDR, High Density
Residential District for the subject property is requested to enable the applicant to develop this
site with multi-family dwellings. The neighborhood is surrounded by a marina use to the west; a
park and multi-family residential uses to the south; Clearwater Harbor to the north and multi-
family residential to the north and east. The proposed residential use will blend into the
surrounding neighborhood since this is a primarily residential area.
The proposed Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan classification and HDR, High
Density Residential zoning district are consistent with both the City and the Countywide
Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the
provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with
the development regulations of the City.
.
The Planning Department recommends approval of the following actions on this
application: 1) Amend the Future Land Use Plan designation of 202 Windward Passage from
Commercial General (CG) to Residential High (RH), and 2) amend the zoning district
designation of 202 Windward Passage from the C, Commercial District to the HDR, High
Density Residential District.
In response to a question, Mr. Mariano said the applicant is proposing to build 55 units at
a height of 64 feet, which exceeds FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency)
restrictions of 14 feet. The existing building is approximately 45 feet high. The complex
immediately south of this property contains three story garden style town homes. Dolphin Cove
Condominiums are eight floors high. Mr. Mariano said the development potential of the
Commercial General designation on this property is the most intense designation permitted.
Marinas and office buildings could be built in a Commercial General land use designation area.
Discussion ensued regarding the evacuation of a Commercial General designated area. Ms.
Tarapani remarked that sufficient warning always is given to people when the potential for a
hurricane exists. It was remarked that this request is resulting in a net reduction of the number
of sites to store boats. Demand for boat storage remains high. Mr. Mariano said he was not
aware of any formal proposals regarding marine storage facilities in the City. He said the
Clearwater Yacht Club is nearby. He said he has, on occasion, received complaints regarding
on-street parking on days when this marine facility is being used heavily.
.
Harry Cline, applicant's representative, said Dolphin Point Condominium is 10 stories
over parking. The maximum height of this built would be 45 feet. The applicant's property is on
a cui de sac and at the end of a finger. He felt a Commercial designation is appropriate on this
street. The site has over 300 boat slips with limited sales and service. This property is paved
100% from lot line to lot line and has no open space. Parking also has been a problem. This
proposal is to rezone this property from Commercial to High Density Residential to construct a
condominium development. The surrounding fingers also are zoned High Density Residential.
He said this development would not be a high-rise condominium development. There would be
Community Development 2003-01
30
1/21/03
i
J
.
four residential levels over parking. He referred to draft renderings of the project. He said the
traffic and noise would decrease with this proposed use. Currently, on holidays the traffic
demand exceeds capacity on this street. He said the Village condominiums have indicated they
were supportive of this proposal as long as a high rise is not built. He said this project is
compatible with the surrounding area.
The Chair noted that the CDB is only considering the request to change the land use
and zoning today; not the site plan or the project.
In response to a question, Mr. Cline said the current land use allows 30 units per acre.
This proposal is for four additional units per acre or a total of 11 units over the current capacity.
It was remarked that the DCA (Department of Community Affairs for Florida) has been denying
requests for land use changes that involve additional numbers of units. Mr. Cline said those
denials were applied to projects on barrier islands and those cities' zoning and land use plans
may differ from Clearwater's regulations.
In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said staff is aware of other beach communities'
land use and zoning decisions. Clearwater's primary obligation is to provide increased housing
throughout the City. She said staff feels this proposal would result in a small, incremental
impact on the system.
.
Sal Haider, developer, said this project would result in a high quality product with four
stories over a garage. The project would be built within the allowable space. He said although
the project exceeds the Code's height requirements, 110 parking spaces under the building is
planned, which exceeds parking requirements. In response to a question, Mr. Haider said
preliminary plans are to incorporate 23 - 26 boat slips, which would be available for sale to
residents of this complex. Some parking spaces would include garage doors.
Ten persons spoke in opposition of the application.
In response to a question, Mr. Cline said the applicant's survey indicates that his client
owns the submerged lands. He said a title search is being done to confirm his claim.
In response to a question, Ms. Clayton said the unmetered parking spaces that one
resident referred to on the south side of the subject site are merely a result of people parking in
the City right-of-way. Mr. Cline said this proposal would provide for on site parking for property
owners.
Ms. Tarapani reviewed the process for notification of adjacent property owners regarding
applications involving a request to deviate from Code regulations. She said the issue of
property ownership of the submerged lands under the docks at the Village on this site is a
matter between the two property owners, however staff welcomes any information or
documentation regarding the matter. The applicant is claiming ownership rights. The Village
property owners have indicated that applicable permits those docks were obtained in 1982.
.
It was remarked that the land use plan in the area on the northeast side of Windward
passage is Residential Medium. In response to a question, Ms. Clayton said if this site was
zoned Residential Medium, the appropriate zoning designation could be MDR or MHDR.
Heights in the MHDR through a flexible public hearing could be up to 50 feet; in MDR up to 40
feet through a staff approval; or 50 feet through a public hearing. It was remarked that just
south of Dolphin Point is Residential Medium and to the south of that is Commercial General
Community Development 2003-01
31
1/21/03
.
zoning. It was remarked that this request is for Residential High but appears that it more closely
parallels Residential Medium. Ms. Tarapani said Skiff Drive and Dolphin Point have a
Residential High designation and there also is Residential Medium adjacent to the site. It was
remarked that the Residential High designation may be out of character between a Residential
Medium and Commercial General designation. Ms. Clayton said Residential Medium density
allows 15 units per acre and Residential High allows 30 units per acre.
In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said FEMA requires various flood elevations as
measured from the first floor of living space. She said in this current Commercial zoning
designation, the applicant could build a hotel which could potentially be a height of 25 to 50 feet
through a staff approval or flexible standard or higher through a Comprehensive Infill request.
In the Commercial District, 40 units per acre would be permitted. Office buildings also could be
built in the Commercial District. Ms. Clayton said the Engineering department has indicated the
utility capacity on Island Estates would not be adversely affected by this project.
Mr. Cline said he is sympathetic to residents' concerns regarding height of the project.
He said the request before the CDB today is a zoning and land use issue. He feels this request
is appropriate for the area and is compatible with the surrounding area.
It was remarked that the specific elements in the site plan for this project would be
reviewed by staff and the CDB prior to any approvals for setbacks, etc. The City Commission
reviews the CDB's recommendations and makes the final decision regarding these cases.
.
Member Doran moved to approve Item #15, Case LUZ2002-11 011, subject to the issue
of ownership of the submerged land being determined to the satisfaction of the City Attorney's
office. The motion was duly seconded.
In response to a question, Mr. Cline said he felt the issue of ownership of the submerged
lands could be divorced from this application. He is in possession of a land survey, which
indicates that as part of the legal description, the submerged lands belong to his client.
Assistant City Attorney Dougall-Sides said the zoning map has no designation for that parcel.
Mr. Cline said he would withdraw that portion of the application described as submerged lands.
Member Doran amended his motion to delete the portion of the motion that the approval
was subject to the issue of ownership of the submerged land being determined to the
satisfaction of the City Attorney's office. The seconder agreed. Upon the vote being taken
regarding the amended motion, Members Gildersleeve, Mazur, Moran, Doran, Milam, and
Petersen voted "Aye". Motion carried unanimously.
D. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS
Administrative Law Judge Determination
.
Ms. Dougall-Sides said in the case involving the granting of a dock permit to Applicant
Christopher C. Mariani, the final order of the Administrative Law Judge J. Lawrence Johnston
upheld the CDB's determination not to pull the appeal from the CDB's Consent Agenda and
hold a full judicial hearing on the request. The judge also specified which portions of the record
should be forwarded to DOAH (Division of Administrative Hearings). Ms. Dougall-Sides said the
judge's decision speaks well for future decisions of the CDB with respect to those types of
appeals.
Community Development 2003-01
32
1/21/03
.
.
.
Election of Officers
Discussion ensued regarding the annual election of officers in January. It was felt that
the election should be changed to the first regular meeting in April of each year. Current officers
would remain in place until April 2003.
Member Mazur moved to change the annual election of officers to April of each year.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Other Business
Concern was expressed that side yard setbacks that are close to structures with
significant heights could affect the quality of landscaping and interfere with view corridors. It
was remarked that zero setbacks are permitted under the Commercial General zoning
designation. It was remarked that because of land costs that cannot be legislated or controlled,
the City is losing its small tourist-driven motel units, which need to be replaced in some fashion.
It was felt the ability to attract the larger resorts also is difficult because of land constraints.
Member Moran said she had an opportunity to watch the Commission Work Session
item in December regarding review of the City's advisory boards. She said the CDB's Chair
represented the board well.
Ms. Tarapani suggested staff present a 20-minute slide show regarding the negative and
positive aspects of some of the projects that have been completed over the years in Clearwater.
Staff will report back to the CDB regarding the date of the City's annual Advisory Board
Appreciation Dinner. It was remarked that the dinner might be changed to a more informal
format.
E. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 4:11 p.m.
~ CQ-~~
Chair
Community Development Board
Attest:
Board Reporter
Community Development 2003-01
33
1/21/03
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUT ORITY,O COMMITTEE
t.,\
o OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
~
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
-l.~~ :2...\ a..\\~
o ELECTIVE
~POINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 88
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
contlict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a contlict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
Ae which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
.rent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
*
*
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
by you or at your direction.
'.au INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
· You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
CE FORM 88 - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 1
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
· A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
· The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
.
· You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
· You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed.
,.
I, ~"'~\.~
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
\) . ~~~tJL
, hereby disclose that on
--l.~~ ~
,20~:
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
_ inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
r---- inured to the special gain or loss of ~ ~~
whom I am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of
'\)~ ~~R1\J~, \~~ .
\
, by
,which
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
~~~"'~~ '"\~~ ~~(tf;~~~\~~... \J~~ ~~~ \~\).~
~~~ ~~~ ~2t~\~
.
~~~ %(.
Date F~\ 2- ,\ ~ 3
5~~
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 9112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOllOWING: IMPEACHMENT
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, o.
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 86 - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 2
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER lOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAM .
zvf2- - J..I~ rei -YV-
.LdG ADDRESS J ~ /f . ,
_ '2.3~<t:) /"'l ~ ~~....JVi'
CITY C I r/f r COUNTY
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE
C f D~../
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON
WHIC I SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
o 0 COUNTY 0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
:t\ME OF P9bITlCAL SUBDIVISION:
C / e ~ yo Iv' ..-v c.L---......
MY POSITION IS:
o ELECTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 88
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council,
commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting
conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
.. ures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea-
~, which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the
arent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or
to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or
163.357, F.S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that
capacity.
For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business
enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation
are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange).
ELECTED OFFICERS:
In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you
are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min-
utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
*
*
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you
must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made
iYOU or at your direction.
OU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE
TAKEN:
· You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the
minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side)
CE FORM 88 - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 1
APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued)
· A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
· The form must be read publicly at the next meeting atter the form is filed.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
.
~.
· You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
· You must complete the form and file it within 15 days atter the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the
meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the
agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting atter the form is filed.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, /!f cI ~~ '-- , he,eby disclose that on ,/ZI;- ~ ~
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain or loss;
inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate,
,20_:
-X inured to the special gain or loss of
whom I am retained; or
inured to the special gain or loss of my relative,
Cfi--~ t.::S(f (Y7~'
, by
inured to the special gain or loss of
is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows:
, which
.
rj)C:o~~ ~~
~~~ ~~hV
1/2A ~3
f .
Date Filed
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 9112.317, A FAILURE TO KE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE
CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHM~!iiIii.
REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, cw
CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000.
CE FORM 88 - EFF. 1/2000
PAGE 2
~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: January 21., 2003
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
900 North Osceola Avenue* ~OO2-10036 Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC..
yes no *To be continued to a later, uncertain date.
1740 Ragland Avenue ~2002-10017 Charlotte Sue Sisk
yes no
2316 Drew Street ~OO2-11022 Drew Park, LLC
yes no .
2316 Drew Street ~OO2-11012 Drew Park, LLC
yes no
1720 Overbrook Avenue ~OO2-11019 City of Clearwater, Public Works Admin.
yes no
3311 66th Street ~OO2-11020 George E. Pappas
yes no
1231 South Lincoln Avenue AN*1021 Ana Ramirez Diaz
yes no
202 Windward Passage
yes
LUZ2OOA'Olt
no
High and Dry Marina, Inc.
yes
ANX2~ 12023
no
Hampton Road Development Corp.
107 Hampton Road
LUZ2002-12av .
yes \no
FLD2002-1~3;! .
yes ~no
Hampton Road Development Corp.
107 Hampton Road
849 Harbor Island
Peter Hunt
300 Pinellas Street
FLD2002- ~5y Morton Plant Hospital Assoc., Inc.
es no
620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings I) FLD2002-11 039/PL T2002-11 003
Beach Motel Management \ J .
yes ~no
674 Bayway Bonlevard (The M:~~ngs * n~2002-11 038/PLTI002-11 002 Cotet, Inc.
FLD2002-t \LT2002_11005 Brightwater Investment Establishment
yes no
FLD20~ 041/PL TI002-1t 004
yes no
Gus DiGiovanni
161 Brightwater Drive
656 Bayway Boulevard
2
692 Bayway Boulevard
yes
1091 Eldorado Avenue
yes
FLD2tl043
no
FLD~_10033
no
Signature:
S:\Planni
, property investigation check list.doc
3
Burnaby Welch Corporation
Carlouel Yacht Club
Date: ~jC'3
f
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: Januarv 21~ 2003
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
900 North Osceola Avenue*
/yes
FLD2002-10036
Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC..
no
*To be continued to a later, uncertain date.
1740 Ragland AVer/.
yes
ANX2002-1 00 17
Charlotte Sue Sisk
no
2316 Drew Street. _ . /"
~es
ANX2002-11022
Drew Park, LLC
no
2316 Drew Street /
\/ yes
LUZ2002-11012
Drew Park, LLC
no
1720 Overbrook A~
yes
ANX2002-11019
City of Clearwater, Public Works Admin.
no
3311 66th Street j
yes
ANX2002-11020
George E. Pappas
no
1231 SouthLinco~ue ANX2002-11021
yes no
Ana Ramirez Diaz
f
202 Windward pa~~
es
LUZ2002-11 0 11
High and Dry Marina, Inc.
no
107 Hampton Road /
~es
ANX2002-12023
no
Hampton Road Development Corp.
849 Harbor Island
" ~ LUZ2002-12013
~es
/
JFLD2002-10034
yes
Hampton Road Development Corp.
107 Hampton Road
no
Peter Hunt
no
300 Pinellas Street
FLD2002~5y
es
Morton Plant Hospital Assoc., Inc.
no
620 Bayway Boulevard (The ~oorings I)
Beach Motel Man~~nt
yes
FLD2002-11039!PLT2002-11003
no
674 Bayway Boulevard (The yDorings II)
(/ yes
FLD2002-11 03 8!PL T2002-11 002 Cotel, Inc.
no
161 Brightwater Drive ~LD2002-11 042/PLT2002-11005 Brightwater Investment Establishment
yes no
656 Bayway Boulevard
/
yes
FLD2002-11041!PLT2002-11004
Gus DiGiovanni
no
2
~-
I
692 Bayway Boulevard
Jyes
FLD2002-11043
no
1091 Eldorado Avenue / FLD2002-10033
~es no
DB, property investigation check list.doc
3
Burnaby We1ch Corporation
Carlouel Yacht Club
Date: II ~l~
.'
.'
,.Jf'''''
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: Januarv 21", 2003
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
900 North Osceola Avenue*
FLD2002-10036
Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC..
.....----yes
no
*To be continued to a later, uncertain date.
1740 Ragland Avenue
....---- yes
ANX2002-1 0017
Charlotte Sue Sisk
no
2316 Drew Street
~.yes
ANX2002-11022
Drew Park, LLC
no
2316 Drew Street
~yes
LUZ2002-11012
Drew Park, LLC
no
1720 Overbrook Avenue
~yes
ANX2002-11 0 19
City of Clearwater, Public Works Admin.
no
3311 66th Street
~yes
ANX2002-11020
George E. Pappas
no
1231 South Lincoln Avenue ANX2002-11021
"'-----yes no
Ana Ramirez Diaz
202 Windward Passage LUZ2002-11011
~ yes no
High and Dry Marina, Inc.
107 Hampton Road ANX2002-12023
~ yes no
Hampton Road Development Corp.
LUZ2002-120 13
yes
Hampton Road Development Corp.
107 Hampton Road ~
no
849 Harbor Island
FLD2002-10034
~yes no
Peter Hunt
300 Pinellas Street
FLD2002-10035
.--- yes
Morton Plant Hospital Assoc., Inc.
no
620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings 1)
Beach Motel Management
, .------yes
FLD2002-11039!PLT2002-11003
no
674 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings II)
FLD2002-11038!PLT2002-11002 Cotel, Inc.
____ yes
no
161 Brightwater Drive FLD2002-11 042!PL T2002-11 005 Brightwater Investment Establishment
~ yes no
656 Bayway Boulevard FLD2002-11041!PL T2002-11004
-----yes no
Gus DiGiovanni
2
692 Bayway Boulevard
~yes
1091 Eldorado Avenue
~yes
FLD2002-11043
no
FLD2002-10033
no
Signature:
S:\Planning Department\C
, pr erty investigation check list.doc
3
Burnaby Welch Corporation
Carlouel Yacht Club
Date: \\~\~
~
.. ..
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: January 21~ 2003
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
900 North Osceola Avenue*
FLD2002-10036
Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC..
yes
..,/' no
*To be continued to a later, uncertain date.
yes
~X2002-1 0017
no
Charlotte Sue Sisk
1740 Ragland Avenue
2316 Drew Street
/' yes
ANX2002-11022
Drew Park, LLC
no
2316 Drew Street /'
/' yes
LUZ2002-11012
Drew Park, LLC
no
1720 Overbrook Avenue
yes
ANX2002-11019
/ no
City of Clearwater, Public Works Admin.
3311 66th Street
yes
ANX2002-11020
J no
George E. Pappas
1231 South Lincoln Avenue ANX200~-11 021
yes ~ no
Ana Ramirez Diaz
,
"
LUZ2002-11 0 11
High and Dry Marina, Inc.
202 Windward Pass~e
V yes
620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings I)
Beach Motel Manyent
yes
107 Hampton Road
107 Hampton Road
849 Harbor Island
300 Pinellas Street
no
ANX2002-12023
yes /' no
Hampton Road Development Corp.
LUZ2002-12013
yes ..,/"
Hampton Road Development Corp.
no
FLD2002-10034
yes ~ no
Peter Hunt
FLD2002-10035
yes
Morton Plant Hospital Assoc., Inc.
no
FLD2002-11039fPLT2002-11003
no
674 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings II)
FLD2002-11 03 8fPL T2002-11 002 Cotel, Inc.
~
no
yes
161 Brightwater Drive /' FLD2002-11042fPLT2002-11005 Brightwater Investment Establishment
yes no
FLD2002-11041fPLT2002-11004
no
Gus DiGiovanni
656 Bayway Boulevard /
V yes
2
"
692 Bayway Boulevard
/' yes
FLD2002-11043
no
1091 Eldorado Avenue
FLD2002-10033
yes / no
Signature: ~ r~~
S:\Planning Department\C D B\CDB, property investigation check list.doc
3
Burnaby We1ch Corporation
Car10uel Yacht Club
Date: I - L. \ -03
,.
';
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Meeting Date: Januarv 21.. 2003
I have conducted a personal investigation on the personal site visit to the
following properties.
yes
Ft02-10036
no
Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC..
900 North Osceola Avenue*
*To be continued to a later, uncertain date.
yes
}X2002-10017
no
Charlotte Sue Sisk
1740 Ragland Avenue
yes
~2002-11 022
no
Drew Park, LLC
2316 Drew Street
yes
LUri002-11012
7-no
Drew Park, LLC
2316 Drew Street
1720 Overbrook Avenue
yes
A~002-11019
~~o
City of Clearwater, Public Works Admin.
yes
A <:02-11020
&x~~
George E. Pappas
3311 66th Street
1231 South Lincoln Avenue ANX2002h 1021
yes \:7' no
Ana Ramirez Diaz
202 Windward Passage
yes
LUZ20~11
\ no
High and Dry Marina, Inc.
yes
AN7 12 023
no
Hampton Road Development Corp.
107 Hampton Road
107 Hampton Road
LUZ2002-1201 V
yes ~ no
Hampton Road Development Corp.
849 Harbor Island
FLD2002-10034~
yes ~ no
Peter Hunt
300 Pinellas Street
FLD2002-10035
yes
,Ml'\~Plant Hospital Assoc., Inc.
Vw~~
620 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings I)
Beach Motel Man~ent
yes
FLD2002-11039/PLT2002-11003
no
674 Bayway Boulevard (The Moorings II)
/yes
FLD2002-11038/PLT2002-11002 Cotel, Inc.
no
161 Brightwater Drive ~LD2002-11 042/PL T2002-11 005 Brightwater Investment Establishment
V ~ yes no
656 Bayway Boulevard
J
FLD2002-11041/PLT2002-11004
Gus DiGiovanni
yes
no
2
692 Bayway Boulevard
~s
1091 Eldorado Avenue
~.
FLD2002-11043
no
FLD2002-1 0033
no
Signature:
S:\Planning De
3
Burnaby Welch Corporation
Carlouel Yacht Club