APP2003-00005
6-23-03; 12: 07PM;
-
e ;3
# 2/ 3
.
.
~ Clearwater
;-:~.
~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
CASE #: A(t -#::..1&lO? ~.3
DATE RECEI ED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 500.00 jUl {! j,~ ~JJYj
APPEAL APPLICA TIOl't'LANNING OEPARTME~ff
Level One and Level Two Reviews (Revised 03/29/01) CQY (\F C~ EAR\lVAik!.~
RECEIVED
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
APPLlCATIONlNOTICE OF APPEAL (Code Section 4-502.A & B)
An appeal of a level one approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which Is the subject of the approval
within seven days of the date the development order is issued. The filing of an application! notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision
pending the final determination of the case.
An application! notice of appeal of appeal of any decision of the city, as provided in Sectlon 4-501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person
granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be f1Ied with the city clerk in a form specified by the community
development coordinator Identifying with specificity the basis for the appeal and accompanied by a fee as required by Section 4-202.E. The filing
of an application! notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case.
A. APPELLANT AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPEL~TNAME: The Cepcot Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 6025, Clearwater, FL 33758
PHONE NUMBER:
727-531-8913
FAX NUMBER: 727-536-8066
AGENT NAME:
E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire
MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box llfiR. Clearwater, FL 33757-1368
PHONE NUMBER:
727-461-1818
FAX NUMBER:
727-4fi7.-0lnS
8. APPEAL INFORMATION
CHECK THE SPECIFIC APPEAL:
ADDeals to tha Community Dave/oDment Board
o Orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made by
an administrative official in the administration of the
development code, except for enforcement actions.
o Administrative interpretations of the development code
o Level One (Flexible and Minimum Standard) approval
dedsions
o Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions
of this Code
ADoeals to a hear/no officer
(Zj Decisions of the community development board regarding
level two approvals
o Decisions of the community development board regarding
level one approvals
o OTHER (as allowed by Code)
657 Court Street
ADDRESS OF SUBJECT APPEAL (if applicable):
SPECIFIC CASE NUMBER TO BE APPEALED (if applicable):
DATE OF DECISION: June 17, 2003
FLD 2002-12045
Page 1 of 2 - Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews}- City of Clearwater
6-23-03; 12:07PM;
It
e
;3
#
3/
3
't
C. BASIS OF APPEAL:
Explain in detail the basis for the appeal. Use additional sheets If necessary.
This is a request for flexible development approval to permit an automobile
service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopmen
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903-C of the Community Development
Code. There was not substantial competent evidence to sustain the decision
of the Community Development Board on June 17, 2003 to deny the applicant's
request. The Board's decision to deny this request departs from the essential
requirements of law.
D. SIGNATURE:
E. D.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNlY OF PINELLAS
swomJto and subscribed before.3me this 2.S1)...day of
une . A.D. 20U to me and/or by
Armstrong lIT . wfiOis personally known
~-------
as
I. the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
/;~
re of property owner or representative
D. Armstrong III, Esquire
~6..~
My commission expires:
\\MS2\PDSIP/anning DepartmenMpp/icalfon Fonnsldevelopment reviewlAppeal Applicalfon.doc
\,lIltl"
"'-;'W.'.r~<i',, Jayne E. Sears
p"i;6;':'f.~ MY COMMiSSION # DD041066 EXPIRES
;~.~.:O', September 2, 2005
-"!f..,'if..'F;;'t" BONDED THRU TROY fAIN INSURANCE.INC.
Page 2 of 2 - Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews)- City of Clearwater
JOHNSON, BLAKELy-' POPEA BOKOR..... RUPPEL & BURNS. P.A. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368
' CITY vF CLE/"\RWATE"
010816
043953.106375
6/25/2003
CITY OF CLEARWATER
500.00
Check Total
500.00
FOAM ltaO!J9 OSI- TAMPA, FL 813-886-0521
r------------------------------------------------~-------~------------------~--____--_______
I
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF CLEARWATER,FLORIDA
MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPT Date (~.<-
Received from (~k}t,..Hnv tiLit./et1;y" "I;t,.~..~loft,Fl,-'. <11 71PP':, ^' l1J,t"~i P/~
rl. ". ' "I;'" "I)'
\.or L t1.. J t' . j ',.." r". ." ,', ." . _ . i ,.~ i '.
In payment of {,.M>IU.....<~ lJf/ -<{'I' ,1..J '~i.L '1IH !"J,. tJ ,;"'")0,,,, . L.l(.llf,~> {r.
Amount received ",}.Hd I!//,.. Ai. 'I" P,<. .,f.J;fl r
433307
:U#
.' 20 &:3 .
,~,-"'.,~,-. -"'._.~ -' >-.-~
_ ~i-/'" /lft. -'t..;,-.i d {~,e'.t /~/ j,:Jl ;-i- cO:
. ~ "l';<L; ~".~-; ;~. ;,., '. . )
.., ," . 'Dollars ,'"
Fund 'I) ,.1, (,
Code
,'0 _ ,
,~,,>''''''J j), ,/; l _J
CITY OF CLEARWATER
$'
" J
.- /;(J
I.., ., .t'"
Depar~merit
i' ;
>
.'
Received By
r
.
.
Wells, Wayne
Importance:
Dougall-Sides, Leslie
Wednesday, December 03,2003 1 :01 PM
Tarapani, Cyndi
Akin, Pam; Brumback, Garry; Wells. Wayne
The CEPCOT Corporation and CW Train Station v. City, DOAH Case No. 03-2585
High
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
subject:
The Administrative Law Judge's decision has been posted to the DOAH website.
ALJ Meale UPHELD the COB's decision to DENY approval for a convenience store with gas pumps.
There was sufficient evidence before the COB that the applicant did not meet the criteria for impracticality
of alternative development and for design [CDC Section 2-903C.1. and 7.].
Thanks to Planning staff for their assistance in presenting this case!
The Final Order may be found at:
http://www.doah.stateJI.us/ros/2003/03-2585.PD F
The applicant has 30 days to appeal to Circuit Court for a record review if it so desires.
1
.
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
THE CEPCOT CORPORATION AND
CLEARWATER TRAIN STATION,
INC. ,
Petitioners,
vs.
CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING
DEPARTMENT,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 03-2585
FINAL ORDER
Robert E. Meale, Administrative Law Judge of the Division
of Administrative Hearings, conducted the appeal hearing in
Clearwater, Florida, on October 9, 2003.
APPEARANCES
For petitioner: Darryl R. Richards
Johnson, Pope, Bokor,
Ruppel & Burns, P.A.
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
For Respondent: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue on appeal is whether, pursuant to Clearwater Code
of Ordinances Section 4-505, to sustain or reverse, with or
without conditions, the decision of the Community Development
.
.
Board on June 20, 2003, denying Cepcot Corporation's application
to build a convenience store with two islands for pumping gas.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
On May 20, 2003, Petitioner filed an application with
Respondent for approval of a development. Respondent's
Development Review Committee examined the application, and
Respondent's Community Development Board published notice that
it would consider the application at its meeting of June 17,
2003. At the meeting, the Community Development Board denied
the application and issued its Development Order to this effect
on June 20, 2003.
On June 25, 2003, Petitioners timely filed a Notice of
Appeal of the determination of the Community Development Board.
Respondent transmitted the appeal to the Division of
Administrative Hearings, which conducted the hearing pursuant to
City of Clearwater Community Development Code Section 4-505.
At the hearing, the parties did not present witnesses.
Instead, they presented Joint Exhibits 1-5 and Petitioner
Exhibits 1-2, all of which were admitted.
The court reporter filed the transcript on October 29,
2003. The parties filed their Proposed Final Orders on the same
date.
2
.
.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Petitioner The Cepcot Corporation (Cepcot) owns real
property located at 657 Court Street in the downtown zoning
district of the City of Clearwater (Property). On December 17,
2002, Cepcot filed a Flexible Development Application for a
comprehensive infill redevelopment project (Application) on the
Property.
2. At the time of the proposal, the Property, which
comprises 0.95 acres, was developed with a restaurant in a
building that was the former Clearwater train station, a thrift
store, and a park. The Application proposes the demolition of
these improvements and their replacement with a 3200 square-foot
convenience store and two gas pump islands.
3. The Property fronts Chestnut Street to the south, East
Avenue to the east, and Court Street to the north. The
surrounding area is developed with office uses to the west and
south, a privately owned utility plant to the north, and
warehouse uses to the east. Upon the completion of the Memorial
Causeway bridge, which is presently under construction, traffic
to the beach will use Court Street and traffic from the beach
will use Chestnut Street.
4. In response to questions and suggestions from
Respondent's staff, Cepcot revised the proposed site plan
several times. The Application is presently complete.
3
.
e
Respondent's Planning Department prepared a Staff Report, which
finds that the proposed project does not meet certain
requirements and recommends denial of the Application on several
grounds.
5. On June 17, 2003, Respondent's Community Development
Board (CDB) considered the Application. CDB denied the
Application and issued a development order explaining the
reasons for denial as follows:
1. The proposal is inconsistent with the
adopted Community Development Code, the
Comprehensive Plan, 1995 Clearwater Downtown
Redevelopment Plan, and the Downtown Design
Guidelines.
2. The proposed automobile service station
is not a permitted use within the downtown
district.
3. Approval of the proposed use may
encourage other like uses and may be
detrimental to downtown redevelopment.
4. The proposal does not comply with the
Flexible Development criteria as a
comprehensive infill redevelopment project
per Section 2-803.
5. The proposal is not in compliance with
the other standards in the Code including
the general applicability criteria for
Section 3-913.
6. Most of the reasons cited for denial involve
Respondent's Community Development Code (CDC), which is the land
development regulations. The Property is in the Downtown
District. CDC Section 2-901 states:
"The intent and purpose of
4
.
e
the Downtown District is to establish a mixed use downtown where
citizens can work, live, and shop in a place which is the
economic, governmental, entertainment and cultural focal point
of a liveable city. II
7. CDC Section 2-902 sets forth the permitted uses within
the Downtown District, and CDC Chart 2-100 lists permitted uses
by zoning district. The proposed uses are not among the
permitted uses for the Downtown District (or the Tourist
District, to which portions of the record refer). CDC Section
2-903.C sets forth the following ten criteria to be applied in
determining if the proposed use qualifies as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project (CIRP) that may qualify an
otherwise non-permitted use:
1. The development or redevelopment of the
parcel proposed for development is otherwise
impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standardsj
2. The development of the parcel proposed
for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment project will not reduce the
fair market value of abutting propertiesj
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill
redevelopment project are otherwise permitted
in the City of Clearwaterj
4. The uses or mix of uses within the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project
are compatible with adjacent land useSj
5. Suitable sites for development or
redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses
within the comprehensive infill redevelopment
5
.
.
project are not otherwise available in the
City of Clearwater;
6. The development of the parcel proposed
for development as an comprehensive infill
redevelopment project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development;
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive
infill redevelopment project creates a form
and function which enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City
of Clearwater as a whole;
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width,
required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to
community character and the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole;
9. Adequate off-street parking in the
immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3
will be available to avoid on-street parking
in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development;
10. The design of all buildings complies
with the Downtown District design guidelines
in Division 5 of Article 3.
8. CDC Section 3-913.A sets forth the General
Applicability criteria. CDC Section 3-913.A.1 states:
"The
proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the
scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent
properties in which it is located." CDC Section 3-913.A.5
states: The proposed development is consistent with the
6
.
.
community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development."
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
9. The Division of Administrative Hearings has
jurisdiction over the subject matter. Section 120.569, Fla
Stat. (2003), and CDC Sections 4-501 and 4-505.
10. CDC Section 4-505.B provides that the hearing officer
conducting this appeal shall receive "the record before [CDB] "
and "oral argument." Absent a factual dispute concerning the
contents of the record before CDB, the hearing officer does not
receive evidence at the appeal hearing.
11. There is no material factual dispute as to the
contents of the record before CDB in this case. The inclusion
and consideration of Petitioners' exhibits as part of the record
before CDB does not dictate a different result.
12. CDC Section 4-505.D directs the hearing officer to
enter findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a determination
approving, approving with conditions, or denying the
Application. The appellate nature of this proceeding commands a
greater level of deference to the actions of CDB than would
apply if this case were de novo. The findings of fact thus
consist of undisputed direct facts, largely culled from the
Application, CDB1s development order, and Respondent's planning
documents. Based upon these findings of fact, the hearing
7
.
.
officer then reviews the ultimate findings of fact and
conclusions of law of CDB.
13. CDC Section 4-505.C provides:
The burden shall be upon the appellant to
show that the decision of [CDB] cannot be
sustained by the evidence before the board,
or that the decision of the board departs
from the essential requirements of law.
14. The reference to "evidence" in CDC Section 4-505.C is
to "competent, substantial evidence." See Sobeliski v. City of
Clearwater and Mariani, DOAH Case No. 02-3637 (January 13,
2003). Compare DeGroot v. Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912, 916 (Fla.
1957) ("Substantial evidence has been described as such evidence
as will establish a substantial basis of fact from which the
fact at issue can be reasonably inferred.
[T]he evidence
relied upon to sustain the ultimate finding should be
sufficiently relevant and material that a reasonable mind would
accept it as adequate to support the conclusion reached. To
this extent, the 'substantial' evidence should also be
, competent. I " )
15. Petitioners do not cite any procedural irregularities
as grounds for their challenge in this case. Instead, they
challenge CDB's substantive determinations that the proposed
project was inconsistent with various planning documents.
Because CDB's determination that the proposed project was
inconsistent with the CDC is sustained, it is unnecessary to
8
.
.
consider the other planning documents, with which CDC found
inconsistencies.
16. CDB's determination that the proposed project is
inconsistent with the CDC is supported by competent, substantial
evidence and does not depart from the essential requirements of
law.
17. Stressing the literal wording of the first CIRP
criterion, petitioners argue that their proposed project
satisfies this criterion because it would deviate only from the
use standard of the CDC, not the "use, intensity and development
standards" of the CDC. CDB applied this requirement in the
disjunctive, so that the failure of the proposed project to
satisfy the use standard meant that it failed the first CIRP
criterion, absent evidence that the redevelopment of the
Property is otherwise "impractical."
18. CDB's application of the first CIRP criterion is
supported by competent, substantial evidence and does not depart
from the essential requirements of law. Common sense suggests
that the CDC's use of the conjunctive, rather than the
disjunctive, was inadvertent; otherwise, the attempt to
designate certain uses at certain intensities would fail, as
partial compliance would satisfy the language of this
regulation. Moreover, the redevelopment of the Property is not
impractical without deviations from the applicable use,
9
. e
intensity, or development standards. Permitted uses are
numerous, and the Property appears suitable for any number of
them.
19. The proposed project satisfies the second, third,
fifth, eighth, and ninth CIRP criteria. Respondent did not
contend to the contrary at the appeal hearing or in its proposed
final order. Although Respondent argued at the appeal hearing
that the proposed project fails to satisfy the fourth criterion,
based in part on a strained reading of this criterion to apply
to future rather than existing land uses, Respondent has not so
argued in its proposed final order. Likewise, Respondent has
abandoned its argument that the proposed project is not
consistent with the sixth criterion.
20. Respondent continues to contend that the proposed
project fails to satisfy the seventh and tenth CIRP criteria.
The immediate vicinity of the Property is occupied by offices,
warehouses, and a small utility plant. A gas station and
convenience store would serve the beach-bound traffic, although
it would serve as well the nontransportation functions of
surrounding uses. Additionally, the proposed project, as a
nonurban convenience store with a couple of gas pumps, would
cover little of the Property, and CDB may lawfully determine
that the proposed project would appear disharmonious with the
surrounding bulkier structures. Under these circumstances,
10
.
.
CDC's determination concerning the seventh CIRP criterion is
supported by competent, substantial evidence and does not depart
from the essential requirements of law.
21. However, it is unclear how the proposed project fails
to satisfy the tenth CIRP criterion. In its proposed final
order, Respondent did not expand upon its claim that the project
fails to satisfy this criterion. The basis for this claim seems
to involve off-street parking, but, if the proposed project
satisfies the ninth CIRP criterion, it should also satisfy the
tenth CIRP criteria, after that criterion is reduced to off-
street parking concerns. Under these circumstances, CDC's
determination concerning the tenth CIRP criterion is not
supported by competent, substantial evidence and departs from
the essential requirements of law.
22. Petitioners argue that Respondent must balance the ten
CIRP criteria, so that the failure to satisfy any single
criterion does not preclude qualification as a CIRP. CDC
applied these ten criteria in the conjunctive, so that the
failure to satisfy any single criterion precludes qualification
as a CIRP. As the practical reading of the first CIRP criterion
supported CDB's application of this criterion's three
requirements in the disjunctive, so does the practical reading
of the ten CIRP criteria support CDB's application of these
requirements in the conjunctive. Failing to satisfy the first
11
.
.
and seventh CIRP criteria, the proposed project therefore does
not qualify as a CIRP.
23. It is unnecessary to consider CDB's determination that
the proposed project fails to satisfy the first and fifth
General Applicability criteria, or Petitioners' argument that
the General Applicability criteria are inapplicable. These
General Applicability criteria emphasize the form and appearance
of adjacent properties and are incorporated into the part of the
seventh CIRP criterion covering form.
ORDER
It is
ORDERED that the decision of the Community Development
Board to deny the Application is sustained.
DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2003, in
Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
~
ROBERT E. MEALE
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
www.doah.state.fl.us
12
.
.
Filed with the Clerk of the
Division of Administrative Hearings
this 2nd day of December, 2003.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748
Cynthia Tarapani, Planning Director
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748
Darryl R. Richards
Johnson, Pope, Bokor,
Ruppel & Burns, P.A.
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW
Pursuant to Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 4-505.D, a
party may obtain judicial review of this Final Order by filing
an application for a writ of common law certiorari in the
appropriate circuit court.
13
'j
\
e
e
01 uJ1J/tthJ ~~
C I T Y OF CL EAR W ATE R
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
Ow HALL, 112 SOUTH OSCEOIA AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4010 FAX (727) 562-4021
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
RECEIVED
July 15, 2003
JUL 1;) 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
James W. York, Deputy Chief Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550
Re: Appeal of Denial of Flexible Development Application, FLD 2002-12045
Dear Judge York:
f!IrIIIIfl
.~
Enclosed are two copies of the following file documents, together with one verbatim
cassette recording of the proceedings regarding the above-referenced case before the
Community Development Board, whose decision is being appealed by applicant The
Cepcot Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.:
1. Notice of appeal dated June 25, 2003 by The Cepcot Corporation and
Clearwater Train Station, Inc., Appellant.
2. Public hearing notice dated June 1, 2003.
3. Draft Minutes of Community Development Board meeting of June 17, 2003.
4. Flexible Development application, supporting materials, map, staff report and
staff comments.
5. Set of file materials from Planning Department on FLD2002-12045.
For the convenience of the parties and witnesses please schedule the oral argument in
Clearwater. You may contact Gwen Hollander in the City Attorney's Office at 562-4010
to schedule City Commission chambers, the City Manager's large conference room, or
other City locations.
Please advise the parties as soon as an administrative law judge is assigned to this
case.
BRlAN J, AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
..,
t
e
e
Leslie K. Dougall-Sides
Assistant City Attorney
Enclosures
Copies to:
E.D. Armstrong, III, Esquire [copy of all materials except audiotape]
City Clerk [letter only]
Planning [letter only]
.1
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRlLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (J27) 562-4576
June 20, 2003
Mr. Randy Wedding
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-12045 - 657 Court Street
Dear Mr. Wedding:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On June 17, 2003 the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development approval to permit an automobile service station in the Downtown District
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C at
657 Court Street. The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the application with the
following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The proposal is inconsistent with the adopted Community Development Code,
Comprehensive Plan, 1995 Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown
Design Guidelines;
2. The proposed automobile service station is not a permitted use within the Downtown District;
3. Approval of the proposed use may encourage other like uses and may be detrimental to
Downtown redevelopment;
4. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803; and
5. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
June 20, 2003
Wedding - Page Two
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on July 7,2003 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.c1earwater-fl.com.
Very truly yours,
~.~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
Cc: Mr.E.D.Armstrong
\ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXllnactive or Finished ApplicationslCourt 657 Auto Service Station - DeniedlCourt
657 Development Order. doc
i..'-.._,'_ '.'
'i', ' __\\-============
r.'.......... ,. . --11--.= --'""t"t""
. ". '"----- ~ "
......- - ---. ---.-. I
'-'.-...-- .' .
0,'1'.,
I ,.........
I-;~\ II r"jl...
III II ~.........I.....'..
I ,...... I \I .":.:c
. ..
1-
~
v\ .
v
2~
~ ~~ t ('" v.! Y :r n
' ';., ~ 1.- (V :- f i:J t' '-'" I" b
r t' S" E: , "'::...; ,
~ I: <.. 't' f. a.- (' NT, -1"" _ 'i' --t- i
<.J> ~ ...J;, - Y. e- < ~ \ "' ~ "'I ~ ... \
1 ~ ... ~ t =\l, ';, p o' -If ~ .....:/ ~ ... !
...-
~
~
c:::,.A-- ~ ~ tV .r v
~., r;;;-r l , , , ( c)..,j,. d
.~ ~ t ;. ; _ ~ y ~ ~~
J~) \ ____~
f 1 1t
,'. LL 1
d/ v.
;./ ~v
,
".
=====
===--
=~
11~_ft,.
=--
$If" . .
-II:JUl:iI. -
'1..:...'.1....2". PALM II
.;;"[0 BE
,I~.REMOVED" . I
--,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
3 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
EXIS,J.-
BUILf~:~,NG
, r;''ir20;Sl,.tbi
",\'20.1-4f (M)
,...-
:.-m::=--=~' ..' '......
EXIST; .x". .")f"
23uOAI<, ....,.'...;..,4"
.~'~ ?,'~~...;.:...... ,^' ":~'-:)0>,
..
.
LL
- rwater
0'"
I-
-
()
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO:_e.~- ~",h> l n\'J L'E~ ~I'"'M.\~
FAX: '. ce, ~ - +'2.... \ \. I 4 \0 'Z... b 3 \0.:)
(
/ +t,\" \~\t
I
Phone: l6 z... \ .. u ~ \ '\)
FROM: W ~ will.s
DA TE:~ ~ 1-' 0 '3
Phone:_S" '0 '2 - + SO 4-
RE: . to 5 7 c..o ,-,r \- __)~... & +-
MESSAGE: ~cl1 ~l..
\...i:~ ~ -.Jj ~L~-\l. ~
\) f-Q.. "-.crM~~.s .
"::> k ~,~ \, '" I\t ~ \) \~\Y\tt"'
. )
t""-~\ S, ov....J... '5 Q.,( D ItA F-T
C\v-UT\ ~ .. ~ \\. Ar- d.'- ,.,+
OS.. 2.. - z.. S' \tI ~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3
,--
~ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT -~
I I
TIME 05/09/2003 13:47
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
05/09 13:43
94620365
00:03:06
03
OK
STANDARD
"\.'1"
~ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT ~
I I
TIME 05/09/2003 13:42
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
05/09 13:39
98944216
00:03:24
03
OK
STANDARD
ECM
.
.
WEST COAST DESIGN, INC.
10681 Gulf Blvd., Suite 205
Treasure Island, FL 33706
Phone (727) 368-0491
Fax (727) 368-0589
DRAINAGE CALCULATION INDEX AND CERTIFICATION
CONVENIENCE STORE
657 COURT ST.
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
SECTION 15-29S-15E
PINELLAS COUNTY
PROJECT No. 03-004
DESCRIPTION
PAGE
Calculation Index and Certification
Rational Method Drainage Calculations
Stage-Storage for Retention Pond
1
2
3
MAY 0 2 2003
.../ 4/?r;.~
mes E. Shirk, P.E. Date
FI. Reg. No. 46468
MEMBER ST. PETERSBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
.
.
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - RATIONAL METHOD
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNER
DATE
657 COURT STREET
03-004
DCL
JAN. 29, '03
o 2-YEAR
o 3-YEAR
o 5-YEAR
o 10-YEAR
1 25-YEAR
o 50-YEAR
TIME OF CONCENTRATION
HIGH EL.=
LOW EL. =
DISTANCE=
26.9
24.5
320
T.O.C.................... 9.0 min.
IF LESS THAN 10 MIN. USE 10
INTENSiTY................ 8.46 in/hr
RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS
EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
OTHER C= 0.20
TOTAL
C= 0.81
AC.
0.8232
0.1289
0.0000
0.9521
PROPOSED
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
POND
OTHER C 0.90
TOTAL
C*A=
C=
AC.
0.6297
0.2591
0.0633
0.0000
0.9521
EXISTING RUN-OFF COEF.
INTENSITY
SITE AREA / AC.
0.81
8.46 DISCHARGE {Q} =
0.9521
6.49
1ST-112" 0.9521 1ST-3/4" 0.0000 1ST-1" 0.0000
DURATION INTENSITY INFLOW DISCHARGE REQ.STOR
MIN. INIHR CU. FT. CU.FT. CU.FT.
10 8.46 3462 3892 0
15 7.25 4450 5837 0
20 6.44 5266 7783 0
30 5.35 6571 11675 0
40 4.64 7592 15566 0
50 4.12 8425 19458 0
60 3.72 9122 23349 0
75 3.25 9983 29187 0
90 2.90 10681 35024 0
105 2.62 11260 40861 0
120 2.39 11750 46699 0
135 2.20 12171 52536 0
150 2.04 12539 58373 0
REQUIRED ATTENUATION VOLUME
REQUIRED DER RETENTION VOLUME
TOTAL REQUIRED VOLUME
o
1728
CUFT
CUFT
CUFT
1728
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCL
DATE 4/15/2003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
1755 EL. ............ 25.00
1467 EL.......... 24.50
1467 EL........... 24.50
601 EL.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT
23.00 601 0 24.02 1189 913
23.04 624 24 24.06 1212 960
23.08 646 49 24.10 1235 1008
23.12 669 75 24.14 1257 1057
23.16 692 101 24.18 1280 1106
23.20 714 129 24.22 1302 1157
23.24 737 157 24.25 1325 1209
23.27 759 187 24.29 1348 1261
23.31 782 217 24.33 1370 1314
23.35 805 248 24.37 1393 1368
23.39 827 280 24.41 1416 1423
23.43 850 313 24.45 1438 1479
23.47 873 347 24.49 1461 1536
23.51 895 381 24.53 1483 1594
23.55 918 417 24.57 1506 1653
23.59 940 453 24.61 1529 1712
23.63 963 491 24.65 1551 1773
23.67 986 529 24.69 1574 1834
23.71 1008 568 24.73 1597 1896
23.75 1031 608 24.76 1619 1959
23.78 1054 649 24.80 1642 2023
23.82 1076 691 24.84 1664 2088
23.86 1099 733 24.88 1687 2154
23.90 1121 777 24.92 1710 2220
23.94 1144 821 24.96 1732 2288
23.98 1167 867 25.00 1755 2356
;;II'~llii;;i;i:::i!llllll:
.
\t\Wding
~ Stephenson
& lliargtien
Wedding, Stephenson &
Ibarguen, Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
Phone (727) 821-6610
Fax (727) 894-4216
Professional Registration # AA - 0002922
Letter of
Transmittal
TO: Mr. Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
Planning Department
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
DATE:
April 29, 2003
RE: ~ourt Street Convenience Store
WSI /102111.00)
Case No. FLD202-12045
Automotive Service Station
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
( ) ATIACHED
( ) COpy CORRESPONDENCE
( ) PRINTSIPLANS
( ) INVOICE
. ( ) SPECIFICATIONS
( ) UNDER. SEPARATE COVER. VIA
( ) CHANGE ORDER.
( ) APPROVAL OF SUB'S
( ) CONTRACTOR REQUISmON
( ) INSPECTION REPORTS
( ) FIELD INSfRUCTION
( ) CERTIF. SUBST. COMPo
( ) OTIIER (SEE BELOW)
NO. OF COPIES
DESCRIPTION
13 Sets
Civil Drawings (One original Sign & Sealed & 12 copies)
THEY ARE BEING TRANSMITTED AS MARKED BELOW:
(X) FOR APPROVAL ( ) APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
( ) FOR YOUR USE ( ) FOR YOUR INFORMATION .
( ) FOR YOUR FILFS ( ) FOR FURTIIER PROCESSING
( ) AS REQUESTED (X) FOR REVIEW & COMMENTS
( ) EXECUTION & RETURN
( ) PRICE QUOTATION
( ) FOR DISTRIBUTION
( ) OTIIER (SEE REMARKS)
REMARKS:
BY:
cB:>>J
C.R. Wedding
COpy TO:
File
"1"-< I.T llf~ ['.t:; ,;..1 \"1f7 ~ f".~\l.'..
.d.:_D....;..:....J.I~JU:; . i !:
'_ rl]i MAY 0 2 2003 WI
, i _____.___.___._____. I
, .' 'C" .. l . ,', 0"" .' " (' I
~~: '. -', " ' '-L .)~~'\f'.'-" ~ ._,' ""
'...... ,_ '\ r "M 't, '-''''V_
.._~..'-:.:...:U~F. : ~:i"HNA1U1 _-1
November 1998 - csilforms newll.o.t. #2
~l
.
e
u..
.0
>-
I-
U
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: /(q.(\ J" . WaJ_J~ / E:J 4~
FAX: . ~ tt ~ CJ / + '" 'Z- - 0.3 (oS
/
Phone: <d 2.. (- ~ (g ( 0 / 4- y \. ,I> \ '&
(
FROM: ~,\N.. WQ.\tS. Phone: S\'2-4501-
DATE:~ i:.) illo:3 RE: f.J S"'7 Co vc-r S~ .
MESSAGE: OI'.',\\l'lo..Q.\$ be;"r--4 (Y\Q~ ltd.
J . l
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) .3
~
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
4laRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT~
I I
04/29 11:35
98944215
00:01:34
03
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 04/29/2003 11:38
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524567
DATE, TIME
FAX NO. 1 NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
411tRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT~
I I
04/29 11: 42
94620365
00:01:41
03
OK
STANDARD
TIME 04/29/2003 11:44
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIIDING, 100 SOUTIi MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (127) 562-4576
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
April 29, 2003
Mr. Randy Wedding
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
St. Petersburg~ FL 33701
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (Case FLD2002-12045) to permit an
automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court Street.
Dear Mr. Wedding:
The Planning staffhas reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit an
automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court Street. After a preliminary review
of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete (Case
FLD2002-12045), however, the following must be submitted or addressed:
1. Address compliance with the Downtown Design Guidelines with the new site/building
design. A memorandum was previously submitted detailing how you felt the project
complied (dated January 29,2003).
2. Note: A Unity of Title will be required to be recorded prior to the issuance of building
permits.
3. Note: Staff is not supportive of the use, as it is not permitted under the Downtown
District or the underlying land use classification of Central Business District. The policy
directive from the City Commission is not to support auto-oriented uses within the
Downtown District.
4. Place the note on Sheet A3.1 that the bands and accents on structures will be two shades
darker than the general wall color (buff yellow).
5. Signage, since not shown, may be required in the future to be reviewed by the
Community Development Board when submitted.
6. The dumpster enclosure must be finished and painted to match the main retail building.
Place notes on Sheet A 1.1 for this purpose.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BIll JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
April 29, 2003
Wedding - Page Two
7. A minor detail relates to the truck turning path from Chestnut Street on Sheet T1.1, as it
assumes that the truck will be turning from the southernmost traffic lane across the other
east bound traffic lanes to access the site. There will probably be sufficient area for the
truck to access the site with the truck in the northernmost traffic lane of Chestnut Street.
8. Provide the amount of interior green space (minimum of 10 percent of the paved
vehicular use area) as part of the site data on Sheet A1.1.
9. Provide a narrative as to the developer's intentions of the existing train station, as to
whether it will be completely destroyed, relocated or why it could not be incorporated
into the site design.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on May
15,2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 562-4582 one week prior to the DRC meeting to obtain the time of the day on May
15th for the sufficiency review by the DRC. Responses to the above comments may be helpful at
the DRC meeting, however, additional comments and requirements may result from that meeting.
You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application.
Please be aware that 15 additional sets of the complete resubmittal of all required information, to
include copies of the application, survey, site plan (with any required changes as applicable),
affidavit of authorization, etc. will be required by noon on May 20, 2003, in order to be placed on
the June 17, 2003, Community Development Board (CDB) agenda.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
~'k !1:~1ft
Senior Planner
Cc: Ed Armstrong
\\MS5c\PDSlPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next DRClCourt 657 Auto Service StationlCourt 657 Complete
Letter #3.doc
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SmITH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (]27) 562-4567 FAX (127) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
March 19, 2003
Mr. Randy Wedding
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (Case FLD2002-12045) to permit an
automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court Street.
Dear Mr. Wedding:
The Flexible Development application to permit an automobile service station in the Downtown
District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
903.C, at 657 Court Street was continued to a date uncertain by the Community Development
Board (CDB) on Tuesday, March 18, 2003.
Once a revised application has been submitted for review, the Planning staff will determine
whether the revised application will need to be reviewed by the Development Review Committee
prior to being scheduled for the next available CDB meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior
Planner, at 727-562-4504.
;;:p~
Frank Gerlock
Development Services Manager
Cc: Ed Armstrong
I\MS5cIPDSIP/anning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and Pending\Court 657 Auto Service StationlCourt 657 CDB 3.18.03
Decision Letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BU.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
LL
-0
>- .:
I- -.'
o
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: ~,L LJQ~tJ
FAX: . 8'1;T~~1 ~
Phone: ca z.. ( " (, L1 ( l?
FROM:~~ hJ~/b
DATE:~ ~/J3J13
Phone:~lIZ~SO+-
RE: hS7 Gvrt- st.
MESSAGE:
5-h.~Qr} -hr FL-f>l.<J02---l2.0+S"
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FWRIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUHDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FWRIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (J27) 562-4567 FAX (J27) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
March 7, 2003
Mr. Randy Wedding
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects, Inc. .
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (Case FLD2002-12045) to permit an
automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court Street.
Dear Mr. Wedding:
The Flexible Development application to permit an automobile service station in the Downtown
District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
903.C, at 657 Court Street has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development
Board on Tuesday, March 18,2003.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
~J~f\IL M. W~
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Ed Armstrong
IIMS5cIPDSlPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglCourt 657 Auto Service StationlCourt 657 CDB
Letter. doc
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
\t\edding
~ Stephenson
& Inargtien
Wedding, Stephenson &
Ibarguen, Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
Phone (727) 821-6610
Fax (727) 894-4216
Professional Registration # AA - 0002922
Letter of
Transmittal
DATE: February 25, 2003
TO: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
Planning Department
City of Clearwater
RE: Convenience Store
657 Court Street
Case FLD2002-12045
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
( ) ATTACHED
( ) COPY CORRESPONDENCE
( ) PRINTSIPLANS
( ) INVOICE
. ( ) SPECIFICATIONS
( ) UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
( ) CHANGE ORDER
( ) APPROVAL OF SUB'S
( ) CONTRACfOR REQUISITION
( ) INSPECTION REPORTS
NO. OF COPIES
DESCRIPTION
1 Set
Drainage Calculations
THEY ARE BEING TRANSMITTED AS MARKED BELOW:
( ) FORAPPROVAL ( ) APPROVEDFORPAYMENT
( ) FOR YOUR USE ( ) FOR YOUR INFORMATION .
Ll FOR YOUR FILES ( ) FOR FURTHER PROCESSING
M AS REQUESfED ( ) FOR REVIEW & COMMENTS
REMARKS:
BY: ~
C.R. Wedding, President
COpy TO: File
November 1998 - csi/forms newll.o.t. #2
( ) FIELD INSTRUCTION
( ) CERTIF. SUBST. COMPo
( ) OTHER (SEE BELOW)
( ) EXECUTION & RETURN
( ) PRICE QUOTATION
( ) FOR DISTRIBUTION
( ) OTHER (SEE REMARKS)
RECEIVED
FEB~J)003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER .
.
.
WEST COAST DESIGN INC. FAX TRANSMIlTAL
.._...._.......................................................................................l.......................................................................................................................................
10681 Gulf Blvd., Suite 205 Phone (727) 368-0491
Treasure Island, FL 33706 Fax (727) 368-0589
DATE: February 25, 2003
TO: Randy Wedding
FAX No.: 894-4216
PAGES: Three incl. cover
FROM: David C. Littell
RE: 657 Court St.
PROJ.: 03-004
MESSAGE:
ld W~lc:60 [00c Sc 'qa~
V!JtOL- "T STO~
/LcJ~
RECEIVED
FEB 27 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
68S089[LcL 'ON X~~
~NI N8153a 15~O~ 153M : WO~~
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET ~ N. POND
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCL
DATE 2/1712003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
776 EL.... ......... 25.00
682 EL.......... 24.50
682 EL........... 24.50
398 EL.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\Fr
23.00 398 0 24.02 591 504
23.04 405 16 24.06 598 527
23.08 413 32 24.10 606 551
23.12 420 48 24.14 613 575
23.16 428 65 24.18 620 599
23.20 435 82 24.22 628 624
23.24 442 99 2425 635 648
23.27 450 116 24.29 643 673
23.31 457 134 24.33 650 699
23.35 485 152 24.37 657 724
23.39 472 171 24.41 665 750
23.43 480 189 24.45 872 776
23.47 487 208 24.49 680 803
23.51 494 227 24.53 687 830
23.55 502 247 24.57 694 857
23.59 509 267 24.61 702 884
23.63 517 287 24.65 709 912
23.67 524 307 24.69 717 940
23.71 531 328 24.73 724 968
23.75 539 349 24.76 732 997
23.78 546 370 24.80 739 1025
23.82 554 392 24.84 746 1055
23.86 561 414 24.88 754 1084
23.90 568 436 24.92 761 1114
23.94 576 458 24.96 769 1144
23.98 583 481 25.00 ne 1174
:~lllli'l,ii!il!II~~~~I!I,
"M1UlliYotJOME::~!!~!l[jl:~~:;!:j!~;:;;;;::::::::!:l;j;:~;F~!~!:;:;a~lt j~:~ct.i\Ft;;H:
Gd W~lG:60 ~00G SG 'q~~
68S089~LGL 'ON X~~
JNI N8153a 15~OJ 153M : WO~~
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET - S. POND
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DeL
DATE 2/1712003
ICOMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
1558 EL............. 25.00
1313 EL..... ..... 24.50
1313 EL........... 24.50
579 EL.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT
23.00 579 0 24.02 1078 845
23.04 598 23 24.06 1097 887
23.08 617 47 24.10 1116 931
23.12 637 72 24.14 1136 975
23.16 656 97 24.18 1155 1020
23.20 675 123 24.22 1174 1066
23.24 694 150 24.25 1193 1112
23.27 713 177 24.29 1212 1159
23.31 733 206 24.33 1232 1207
23.35 752 235 24.37 1251 1256
23.39 n1 265 24.41 1270 1305
23.43 790 295 24.45 1289 1355
23.47 809 327 24.49 1308 1406
23.51 829 359 24.53 1328 1458
23.55 848 392 24.57 1347 1510
23.59 867 425 24.61 1366 1564
23.63 886 460 24.65 1385 1618
23.67 905 495 24.69 1404 1672
23.71 925 531 24.73 1424 1728
23.75 944 567 24.76 1443 1784
23.78 963 605 24.80 1462 1841
23.82 982 643 24.84 1481 1899
23.86 1001 682 24.88 1500 1957
23.90 1021 721 24.92 1520 2016
23.94 1040 762 24.96 1539 2076
23.98 1059 803 25.00 1558 2137
IlillL'llli~l,i,i"i~lllll,i!~
~d W~CC:60 ~00c S2 'qa~
68S089~LcL 'ON X~~
~NI N8I530 15~O~ 153M : WO~~
02/21/2003 FRI 11:52 FAX
\
llJ001/003
.
.
RECEIVED
FEe 2 1 2003
jJlANI\I,(\lu 1X Ut.VELOPMENT
::'Er<VICES
CITY 01- l,Lt.A,-(WATER
. MEMO
FROM:
RE:
SUBJ:
DATE:
MR. WAYNE WELLS
SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF CLEARWATER
VIA FAX TRANSMISSION
C.RANDOLPH WEDDING FAIA/ASLA
COURT STREET CONVENIENCE STORE
APPROVAL OF INFILL PROJECT
02/21/03
TO:
DEAR MR. WELLS,
BNCLOSED PLEASE FIND CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WHICH EXEMPTS THIS SITE FROM SECURING AN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT.
SINCE THE NEED FOR THIS PERMIT WAS ONE OF THE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS, I WOULD
APPRECIATE YOUR INCLUDING A COPY.OF THIS INFORMATION IN OUR FILE, AND
REMOVING TIlE REQUIREMENT FROM OUR APPROVAL HURDLES.
BEST REGARDS.
-..,
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibargiien
Architectsl Inc.
I'ROE Rr.G./lAA 000lQn
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402. St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(727) A21.6610 FAX: (727) 894.4216
02/21/2003 FRI 11:52 FAX
. ,'.
. $'outhwest Florida
o/ater Ma~ement District
'--..,. ._.~..... ~
_..JtrlW:.~ :tri"".""":~'~
:_1t.nr"$.i\:>" . 'w. --...llIf'~~"'~;"." -. ,
, ~.... Off.. ..... 8eNIoe 0Iftec:
1001 WClMl130j. NlIrtII 110 eM"'!)' SlII/MIlI
T~. Rg/5;l aH31..e189 1mtIIW. JIorllJI ~7700
(lU) 9&&.748:1 Dl' (ellS) 534-1'CS or .
1~787 (R. 0t\IJ) :l,oIICI~1.e:z I"' lln~
8U/'lc:oM ~~~O .uNllCW ~
. .,
..
~
. . ... ~. '.
." ".~' ,'.
IYlIillIlll
o~
...... .. .......
allar, Pin...
,....... .......,. .
VIM l:IIIlr. $ara"
1hIdI.. ~
s.cl'OT.1/)J ltl"~
"...... --'
Tn-u..r. PiMA"
.. 1tIw~.. ClMMe'
,...
...... .W ....,...
Cilnls
MW." DMIMIII_
I4lIfSll6r8uC'l
....... L ........
, "~
...... Co........
, Poll!
..... .. KiI\IMII
HilllbDlIIlCh
...... .. ........ .
PISCO
. j "
.. D........,. V_
.~ 0iItCtDI
. ~.. .....
Al55istri'~ DlIJJCtOt
WI.... ..........
'.' . ~ Coun&cI
, . '
".
Pmtr.:\.ljng'rfu
Woter RE'~CXJrr..E'.s
.
1lJ002l003
2379 Blvlld SVec:t. Brooksville. Florida 3460~99
(352) 79&-7211. or ~~1.4761l'l tJ"I~)
SU~OM 62&4150 roo only 1-80002S1-6103 (F1. only)
. .
"rl tile IntrIm<< or: WaterMattln.Orl
~ lkrvk.o olIIi:.. LoclPIlta &lN1lI. otIo.
8750 f'Alitvlllo Illllld 3600 West SO"<_~ Pvtl'I
S.rallOta. Floria. 34240-9711 ~ m
(941) 377..722 llr . ~r ~Il. ~.'IOTO
1-IOOo32M!05 (Fl only) (352) 527-&31
.u~o..., "3..0500 $UNCOM UT.:iI:z7~
. .
. FebruarY, 17. 2003
~~~~
874 - 4--~/(,
Fred A, Thomas '
The CEPCOT Corporation
, 144S0 62nd Street North
. Olearwater, FL 33760
'. . . '
. .. j~' .,... . . .... ~.... ~ . ..'....... 'L...... W ....~.... ;...p:'Ipi:lb-!
subJect:" "Pro,..fv8IUlton ~'No.PeriftIt'FteClI~lnlcf .~:.:""- .,~- .,~:.,-~.:-r.~-:-. -,~, ~-.,.~ ", .;:" ,
ProjlRt Name: 657 Court Street
Inquiry Number: 110414
Countf.:. Plnelllu
SaelTWplRge: ,SI29S115E
Lati1udell.ongitud.: 27tst40.85MI82047'49.55M
Rule 400-4.041. Florida Admlnl$trlltlve Code (F,A.C.)
. R~ference:
. Dear.Mr. Thomas:
. . .' '. .
~ Dist~Ct has reviewed tti:e irlformation you submlUed on January 27 and 'FeOruary, 1. 200CUor.1ho
pmject referencecl above ~d has determined that ~ Environmental Resource permit ~jIJ not be
required for the site ,renovation resulting in a 8.428 !Quart' foot Increase in open alea.
The ~formation re~Ved by the DistriQt will be kept IIi the Tampa Service Office 10 ljuppornhe:
, D,iWIot'5 determ lnatlon regarding your project. The District's determination that yC?ur project does not ,
, ' require an ERP is only applicable purwanlto the .tatutes and rules In effect ~the. time tne InforrnCl:t.lon
:WUl slolbm~ and may not be valid In the even~ subsaquent Changes occur In the applicable 'rules
, .and statUtes. Additionally, this notification doe. not mean that the Olsbict has determined that your
. project 18 permilnently cx"rnpt from permlttfng requirements.. Arrr subsequent chazige You mw in
the project'S operauon may nec:essltate further eveJuatlol'l cr permitting by the Distrid, Therefore, you
, are advised co c;ontaot the DiStrfc:tbefore beginning the projectand before beginning any activity which
Isnct~~in'JOUt..,~. YCMM'timclIY~~~~.~,~~i~~,_,.
any put.ntiaf rufefGhl!l'laes that eculd affect your request. . ...... 't ... ...-.........
This letter constitute' notice offiMf agency adion of the project referenced above. You or any person
whae8 substantial interests are aff8ded by the DistrlcC's 8OtIon regarding a permit may requc:.t an
administrative hearing in acc:ordan08 with Sectlons 120.569 and 120.57, F.$., and Chapter 28-1 06.
F .A.C.. ofthe Uniform RUles of Procedure. A request f"r hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial
, intetSsts of sach person reqrJe$ling th. hearing wi/I be affected by the District'S sdion, or pf'(J{:JOS8d
aclion, (2) state all ""'tt!l'ill' f~r:ts disputed by the person fequestirlg the hearing or state that there are
no disputed facts, and (3) othelWiStl comply With Ohapter 28-106, F.AC. Copies of Sections
28-106.201 and 28.109.301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be
flied with (reoelved by) the Agency Clerk of the Dlstr10t .t the District's Brooksville address within 21
days of receipt of this nouae. Flecelpt Is deemed to be the fifth day aftertne date on which this notice
Is deposited In the United States mail. Failure to file Q retluest for hearing within this time perioclshall
constitute a weiver of any right you or flllCI'I person may have to request a hearing under SectIons
RECEIVED
ld w~se:60 ~~ l~ 'qa~
68S089~LGL 'ON ~~
:IN I Nfl I iEB1~J::> 2ll!i. : WOe8
PLANI\JII\JG & Di:::.Vt.LOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY Ur CLE.Ar~WATER
02/21/2003 FRI 11:53 FAX
.
.
llJ003/003
Fred A. Thomas
Pa~e 2
February 17.2003
120.669 and 120.5'7. F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.$.. to settlaan admlnl,tratlve dISpute regarding
the District's action In thill mlllier is not available.
Enclosed is a WNotigin9 Packet' that provides information regarding DIstrict Rule. Section 400.1.1 01 0, F.A,C" whIch
addresses 1he notification of persons whosv substanllallnterests may be affected by the Olstrict's action in this
matter. The packet contaiN! guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and 8 notic:e that you may
use. .
If you have questions regardlng,thiS determination, please, contact ~ichard M.AIt, P.E.~ .,.~ T~,*~rVic:eOffiQe,
extension 2045. Please rvfenNIc.1he PfoJeot Na.me and Numberin'futU~ comrnunlealkJnsconeemTng'tJ'\l$ proJect
Slneerelyj" ' .
..~
Alba E. MIls, P.E., Director
Tampa Reguletlon Department
AEM:d5w
enctosures:
co:
Noti~ng Packet (42.00.046)
Sldions 28-108.201 and 28-106.301, F.A.O.
Inquiry No. 110474
USACOE
David C. Littell. P.E., West Coast Design. Inc.
".. ";' "
. . t..,., "f_
..
'. ."
.. , .
lel W~:60 mre -rc: 'q;'~
68S0El9rL~l. 'ON >4:;.:1
:>N 1 NmS3Q J.SIdOJ lS~ : W~.:l
I
I /.
~.
.
<~j
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SmITH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
February 10, 2003
Mr. Randy Wedding
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (Case FLD2002-12045) to permit
an automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court
Street.
Dear Mr. Wedding:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to
permit an automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court Street.
After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is complete (Case FLD2002-12045), however, the following must be
submitted or addressed:
I. Dimension the width of the landscape buffer areas along Chestnut Street, East
Avenue and Court Street.
2. Provide an explanation why the terminal landscape islands adjacent to parking
spaces do not extend to the full length of the parking spaces.
3. Site Data is provided on Sheets A1.1 and C1.I, but the data is different on each
sheet. Delete the incorrect Site Data from either Sheet A1.1 or C1.1 so there is
only one place where Site Data is provided.
4. The proposed site design does not provide adequate vehicular traffic circulation
abilities for two-way flow when vehicles are fueling from the end pumps and/or
when delivery and tanker trucks are on-site. Traffic circulation is and will be
confusing to motorists when vehicles are parked in particular locations. Need to
discuss traffic flow.
5. Note: A Unity of Title will be required to be recorded prior to the issuance of
building permits.
6. Note: Staff is not supportive of the use, as it is not permitted under the Downtown
District or the underlying land use classification of Central Business District. The
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII~JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
# ';{;.~
.
.
February 10, 2003
Wedding - Page Two
policy directive from the City Commission is not to support auto-oriented uses
within the Downtown District.
7. Place a note on Sheet A3.1 that the bands and accents on structures will be darker
shades of the general wall color.
8. Signage, since not shown, may be required in the future to be reviewed by the
Community Development Board when submitted.
The Development Review Committee (ORe) will review the application for sufficiency
on February 13, 2003, at 10:00 am in the Planning Department conference room - Room
216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue
in Clearwater. Responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting,
however, additional comments and requirements may result from that meeting.
You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application.
Please be aware that 15 additional sets of the complete resubmittal of all required
information, to include copies of the application, survey, site plan (with any required
changes as applicable), affidavit of authorization, etc. will be required by 4:30 pm on
February 18, 2003, in order to be placed on the March 18, 2002, Community
Development Board (CDB) agenda.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
IV (tv;f\Il- M. t,) oJlh
Wayne' M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Ed Armstrong
I\MS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next DRClCourt 657 Auto Service StationlCourt 657
Complete Letter #2.doc
.
LL
o
-
o
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: ~*J~~'l / EJ ::~
FAX:
Phone: ~ l..-I - (0" I 't)
FRoM:~elb
DATE::..- .kl{ Q !() 3
+\0 \. 1'& I ~
Phone: J t.d 1..- t-:r'O 1- -
RE: (PS7 lov('"+ Si:
MESSAGE:
f~~-lt Ld!v- 1FZ-. Or;~ b~~<"l
. ~. )
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3
,f,
.ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT.
I I
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
02/10 14:55
98944216
00:01:30
03
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 02/10/2003 14:57
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
~ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT ~
I I
TIME 02/10/2003 14:59
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
02/10 14:58
94620365
00:01:37
03
OK
STANDARD
/
i
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FWRlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
January 13, 2003
Mr. Randy Wedding
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (Case FLD2002-l2045) to permit
an automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court
Street.
Dear Mr. Wedding:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible. Development approval to
permit an automobile service station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, at 657 Court Street.
After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is complete (Case FLD2002-l2045), however, the following must be
submitted:
1. Provide the proposed hours of operation of the convenience store.
2. Revise the direction of the utility substation under construction under General
Applicability Criteria #5.
3. Provide the anticipated value of the property after construction under
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #2.
4. Provide on Sheet A1.l the location and setback from property lines for
freestanding signage. Additionally, provide the design, height, color and elevation
(front and side) of proposed freestanding signage (monument signage preferred)
and attached signage. Signage must meet Code requirements. Ensure
freestanding signage is not located within any sight triangles, which also occur on
the site at street intersections, and work together with proposed landscaping.
5. Revise the existing gross floor area and building coverage on Sheet A1.l,
including both buildings.
6. Revise the proposed building coverage to match the gross floor area of 3,200
square feet on Sheet AI.l. The gas canopies are structures, but not buildings.
7. Revise on Sheet A1.l the proposed FAR to include only the enclosed building
floor area of 3,200 square feet.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRAJ"K HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL)ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPWYER"
.
.
January 13, 2003
Wedding - Page Two
8. Revise the proposed height of the building and gas canopies in the Site Data on
Sheet A 1.1 to the mid-point of the roof structure. Additionally, provide the same
height dimensions on the Exterior Elevations on Sheet A3 .1.
9. There is a discrepancy of proposed building/structure color between Sheet A3.1
and the rendering in that the gas canopy columns and trusses are called out as
driftwood gray (preferred), yet the rendering indicates a red color. Provide the
proposed trim color and stucco band color.
10. Still unclear as to whether the 10 feet of additional right-of-way along Chestnut
Street indicated on Sheet Al.l has already been dedicated or is proposed to be
dedicated. Advise. If already dedicated, ensure it is noted in the legal
descriptions.
11. Revise legal description on Sheet A1.1 to the current, correct legal description on
the survey submitted by Brendla and Associates.
12. In the resubmission material for the Community Development Board, delete the
survey by Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying and insert the survey by
Brendla and Associates.
The Development Review Committee (ORC) will review the application for sufficiency
on January 16, 2003, at 10:40 am in the Planning Department conference room - Room
216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue
in Clearwater. Responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting,
however, additional comments and requirements may result from that meeting.
You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application.
Please be aware that 15 additional sets of the complete resubmittal of all required
information, to include copies of the application, survey, site plan (with any required
changes as applicable), affidavit of authorization, etc. will be required by 4:30 pm on
January 21, 2003, in order to be placed on the February 18, 2002, Community
Development Board (CDB) agenda.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
W~\"-L.t\, W ~
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Ed Armstrong
LL
.
.0
>-
I-
o
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: ~^~hJ~~J~
FAX: . B ~ t~ l..-t ~
Phone:
FROM:~~ \-4\\1
DATEL -.1)/ ~JQl-
Phone: ~ 'c> 2- ~ro 'J- -
RE: (OS-; Cov~LSt-
MESSAGE: ~~,id.~ Udte r - On j; ""'} """.)e d +0 10 oj ,
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) .3
~ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT~
I I
TIME 01/13/2003 17:00
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
DATE,TIME
FAX NO. 1 NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
01/13 16:58
98944216
00:01:37
03
OK
STANDARD
ECM
.
-
u
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO:~J.<) \J~ ~~'J
FAX: .~~ 4- ,. 0/ L) \1
Phone:
FROM: \,JD..tty--L \^,,)qJ\~ Phone:--.S to U SO t-
DATE:c- Jj "11'1>3- RE: ton CO.Jr~ st-r~\-
MFSSAGE: A-.,~h :!: .~{?L ,,~~ - .'Yvvr
~~ IL ~~~~ \~~ {i,r ~ c:--- ~~
\1 ILI(?3,
, ~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) s:
u.
o
,
>-
o
9:00 a.m.
.
.
Updated as of 12/31/02
Note: Times are subject to change.
DRAFT AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
January 16,2003
9:30 a.m.
LEVEL TWO CASES:
Staff Review
10:10 a.m.
Case: FLD2002-11040 -20505 U.S. Highway 19 North.
Owner: Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Applicant: Michael Reynold's!Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Representative: E.D. Armstrong, Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. (work: 727.461.1 818/fax:
727.462.0365/email: eda@ibpfirm.com).
Location: The 11.5-acre site is located on the east side of U.S. Highway 19 North, approximately 200 feet south of
Gulfto Bay Boulevard, within the Clearwater Mall redevelopment site.
Atlas Page: 300A.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval, as an amendment to a previously approval Flexible Standard
Development application (FLS2002-06048) to increase the height of material stored/displayed in the garden center
and storage areas from 15 feet to 20 feet, increase the height of materials to be displayed in front of the store from
four feet to eight feet, permit non-living plant material to be displayed in the front of the store, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2- 704.B.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes an amendment to a previously approved Flexible Standard Development
application for outdoor retail sales, display and/or storage within the Commercial District as accessory to a home
improvement retail sales establishment.
Neighborhood Association(s): Seville RO Association (Association President, 2640 Seville Blvd., Clearwater,
FL, 33764).
Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner.
Case: FLD2002-12044 -100 North Lady Mary Drive.
Owner/ Applicant: Michael Drazkowski, Midnight Rose, Inc.
Representative: Mr. Pierre Cournoyer (work: 727.410.3692/fax: 727.467.9494).
Location: The 0.31-acre site is located on the west side of North Lady Mary Drive, approximately 450 feet north
of Cleveland Street.
Atlas Page: 287B.
Zoning: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (north and south) setbacks from 10 feet to six feet (to
building) reduce the lot area from 15,000 square feet to 13,483 square feet and reduce the lot width from 150 feet
to 100 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-402.G.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes four townhomes within a two-story, 3,849 square foot building.
Neighborhood Association(s): Gateway Neighborhood (pat Vaughn, 1326 Pierce St., Apt. #2, Clearwater, FL,
33756,461-7599):
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
DRC agenda - 01/16/03 - Page 1
10:40 a.m.
.
.
Case: FLD2002-12045 - 657 Court Street.
Owners: The CEPCOT Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
Applicant: The CEPCOT Corporation.
Representative: Mr. Randy Wedding (work: 727-821-6610/ fax: 727-894-4216/ email:
randy@weddingarchitects.com).
Location: The 0.95-acre site is located on the west side of East Avenue between Court Street and Chestnut Street.
Atlas Page: 286B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit an automobile service station in the Downtown District as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C.
Proposed Use: The proposal is for the construction of a 3,200 square-foot convenience store with gas pumps.
Neighborhood Association(s): Pierce 100 Condominium Association (Terry Turner, 100 Pierce Street, #710,
Clearwater, FL, 33756).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner.
11:10 a.m.
LEVEL ONE CASES:
11 :30 a.m.
Case: FLS2002-12081 - 619 South Guliview Boulevard.
Owner/Applicant: Sea Wake Motel, Ltd.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee; Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (work: 443.2869/fax: 727.446.8036/email:
nestech@mindsoring.com).
Location: The 1.35-acre site is located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 700 feet
west of Gulf Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 285A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to modify the fa9ade of an existing motel under the provisions
of Section 2-802.K.
Present Use: Overnight accommodations.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes the addition of an entrance canopy to the fa~ade of the existing motel.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater,
FL, 33767, 446-5801, dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
Case: FLS2002-12083 - 3336 San Bernadino Street.
Owner/Applicant: Antony and Susan DiSalvo (work: 727.726.5004/fax: 727.726.4813).
Location: The 0.26-acre site is located on the north side of San Bernadino Street approximately 200 feet west of
Bayshore Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 283B.
Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 22 inches (to
pavement), and reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 5.5 feet (to shed), as part of a Residentiallnfill
Project under the provisions of Section 2-103 .B.
Present Use: Single-family dwelling.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes constructing a 630 square foot driveway extension at the north end of
the existing driveway and a 144 square foot, single-story shed (6.6 percent of the floor area of the existing
single-family dwelling) at the north end of the driveway extension in association with an existing single-
family dwelling.
Neighborhood Association(s): Del Oro Groves Estates Neighborhood Association (Lucille Casey, 3235 San
Mateo Street, Clearwater, FL, 33759, 726-5279, caseygovols@aol.com).
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
DRC agenda - 01/16/03 - Page 2
11 :45 a.m.
1 :30 p.m.
.
.
Case: FLS2002-12082 - 622 Bypass Drive.
Owner/Applicant: Mr. Tom Carey.
Representative: Mr. Keith Zayac, Keith Zayac Associates, Inc. (work: 727.793.9888/fax: 727.793.9855/emai1:
keithzayac@aol.com).
Location: The 1.52-acre parcel is located on the northwest comer of Bypass Drive and Druid Road.
Atlas Page: 299B.
Zoning: 0, Office District.
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the front (east) setback along Bypass Drive from 25
feet to 15 feet (to pavement) and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to building), under the
provisions of Section 2-1003.
Present Use: Office.
Proposed Use: The proposal includes the addition of two, one-story office buildings. A 6,615-square foot
building will be located in the southwest corner of the site. A 3,100 square foot building will be located
centrally along the west property line.
Neighborhood Association(s): None.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
12:20 -1:20 Lunch
Case: FLS2002-12085 - 1101 Cleveland Street.
Owner: Mr. Michael Preston.
Applicant: Mr. William Hayman (work: 727.518.6889/fax: 727.518.6889/cell: 727.744.8828/email:
foamv@tampabav.rr.com).
Location: The 0.90-acre parcel is located on the southeast comer of Cleveland Street and South Martin Luther
King, Jr. Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 287 A.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to establish a restaurant within the Downtown District under
the provisions of Section 2-902.L.
Present Use: Social community center (vacant).
Proposed Use: The proposal includes the establishment of a restaurant (Foamy's Bar & Grill) within an
existing 5,500 square foot, one-story building.
Neighborhood Association(s): Gateway Neighborhood (Pat Vaughn, 1326 Pierce St., Apt. #2, Clearwater, FL,
33756,461-7599).
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
DRC agenda - 01116/03 - Page 3
2:00 p.m.
Case: FLS2002-12084 - 4eandalay Avenue, Unit 113. ...
Owner: BIE Inc. .
Applicant: Mr. Antonio Caggiano (cell: 775-225-1925).
Location: The 1.69-acre parcel is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue approximately 100 feet south of
Baymont Street.
Atlas Page: 267 A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a restaurant (with an outdoor cafe) and alcoholic
beverage sales within the Tourist District utilizing shared, existing or planned and committed parking facilities
within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of Section 2-802.A and N and the Retail and Restaurant
District of Beach by Design.
Present Use: Office (being vacated).
Proposed Use: The proposal includes the establishment of a restaurant (with an outdoor cafe) and a wine
tasting bar within an existing two-story shopping center.
Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL, 33767, 446-5801, dmacnav@att.net).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner.
LEVEL THREE CASES:
2:30 p.m.
Case: REZ2002-12004 - 1215 Bay Avenue.
Ownerl Applicant: Morton Plant Hospital Association.
Representative: Emil C. Marquardt, Jr. (phone: 727-441-8966; fax: 727-442-8470).
Location: The O.II-acre parcel is located on the east side of Bay Avenue approximately 150 feet north of Pinellas
Street and 650 feet west of South Fort Harrison Avenue.
Atlas Page: 305B.
Request: Rezoning from 0, Office District to I, Institutional District.
Proposed Use: Medical Office.
Neighborhood Association(s): Harbor Oaks Homeowners Association (Cedio Saltorelli, 322 Lotus Path.,
Clearwater, FL, 33766, 727-446-0869).
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D Blagendas DRC & CDBIDRCl2003101 JanuarylDRCagenda Ol-16-03.doc
DRC agenda - 01/16/03 - Page 4
r
~ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT .4It
I I
TIME 01/09/2003 10:55
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
01/09 10:52
98944216
00:02:29
05
OK
STANDARD
ECM
.
.
November 22, 2002
Mr. Randy Wedding
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue South, Suite 402
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
RE: Application for an Automobile Service Station, 657 Court Street
Dear Mr. Wedding:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for an automobile service station at 657 Court
Street. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is incomplete. The following information/data must be provided to be deemed
complete:
1. The property is zoned Downtown District. The proposed use is defined by the
Community Development Code (Code) as an "automobile service station." Such use is
not provided for in the Downtown District as a Flexible Standard Development or
Flexible Development use. Given this circumstance, application for such use must be
made as a "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project" Flexible Development process.
This application is a public hearing item before the Community Development Board. A
totally different application must be filled out and the fee is $1205.00. Please note that
the Planning Staff will not support this application.
2. Full written justification of the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project Criteria must be submitted as part of the application.
3. Required visibility triangles are 20' x 20' measured from the property line.
4. Provide one original signed and sealed survey.
5. Provide a tree survey of the subject property and within 25 feet of the site, including the
species, size and location. Healthy trees should be incorporated into the site design.
6. The proposed floor area ratio is incorrect. Revise.
7. Provide the height ofthe proposed structures.
8. Provide dumpster enclosure details and handicap parking space details. Note: Handicap
ramping cannot encroach into the required five-foot wide walk aisle.
9. Interior green space requirements are 10 percent of the vehicular use area.
Revise/provide.
.
.
November 22, 2002
Wedding - Page Two
10. Provide on-site stormwater management facilities and calculations. Payment in lieu
should be discussed with the City's Stormwater Engineering prior to application
submission.
11. A new five feet wide sidewalk along East Avenue is proposed. There is an existing
power pole on the southern portion of this sidewalk where the pole conflicts with the
sidewalk. Is anything being done to relocate the pole?
12. Interior green space islands must be a minimum of eight feet in width (back of curb to
back of curb).
13. Provide the angle of the proposed angled parking spaces.
14. Unclear as to whether the 10 feet of additional right-of-way along Chestnut Street has
been already dedicated or is proposed to be dedicated. Advise.
15. Shade trees must be at least 2.5 inches caliper and 10 feet in height at time of planting.
Accent trees must be at least 2 inches caliper and eight feet in height at time of planting.
16. Show location of proposed freestanding sign(s) and the proposed five-foot setback from
property lines. The Code only permits a monument sign a maximum of four feet in
height.
17. May need a traffic study. Please contact the City's Traffic Engineering Department.
18. Will need to record a Unity of Title for the parcels involved.
19. Building elevations of all four sides must be submitted, including height, dimensions,
colors and materials.
Since this application is incomplete and that a different application and fee is required to be filed,
we request that you pick up the existing submittal. Should you decide to submit the proper
application and submittal requirements, we will review the resubmission for completeness at that
time prior to entering into the Department's filing system and scheduling for the Development
Review Committee and Community Development Board.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely yours,
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Mr. James P. Eisch, COO, The Cepcot Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
(r. -:~;:~;]t
.
T
----~-------------------------
I
I
I
.
~......y
COURT STREET
""''''''
11.11' ....., - ',' CUIII
---I~"
___l-__~
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
\
I
--J---
,
I
I
\
I
I
I
\
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I .......
._----------------------------~-~-
.'
PLANTING LEGEND
8
~
(j)
(!)
(J)
o
~
~
am
IIIIIIIII
~
(!)
(!)
(!)
,_1OG... @
18
""DlI"UIDIfIAfI".1'lIHII
HiloW...''''''ncu.,....
"""--"Ollfller
:..~~~ rsJI =-=IMfI..
lIP au. hilt" ununa IlID __ CCIIDlflM
ric.."....IUILDIflI_.........LIlCI&.~.hllr
_. . alll*' ,. .....-0 I'LMIa .nlUL II," ....... 1'0 M _0.
NIl W4l11llL MI_ ..fa tMLI.
~
I
EXIST~
i-STORY
BUILDI
I
D
~
flj
~~ C
~O~ Cl
UJ~ ~
~Ul~ ..J
UJUl ..
lii!i~ ri
~UJ~ w
..
a:'"' c
a; i3Zl.J I
s l.J~'" w
~lB d
l.J
l:i
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
..----
. .
~======~=========~:~=~-t~-~HE~;~:~= :~~~~~~~===~
/I _UY<:> <It II' ...::..~ '" CUIII II
!. .-=:=-====-===::a
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCAlE: 1..ij!O'-O.
Z
~~.
~ t
l.J
Ul
i
'"
..I
~ 1''-~
Dlng~ i .,
u~~~'11 .J . .~:=:.':
18UOSO~ ....."--~.,,
. 'lb!W'l\\,~~
Y011lll1:l '1131Y_31:1
!3~!S !~~ LS9
~!S 3JN3IN3^NO~
!3~!S !l:lno~
rn~
'~'liiIa. i
P-r ~ ~.
SNOUY^313 l:lOIl:l3!X3 i ~
.1
il.
113
. isl
i!!
!
~ i~
iI'; i"; ~ iloo; ;zOO; . ~ .J
~ ~ i! ~
.. i~ i~ -. -. .. i~ i~ ."'1 . .,;,,;
H~
~
{~
uU
q
..
..
z
o
...
....
<(
....
UI
z
8
....
<(
>
1&1
...J
1&1
J:
....
::I
o
UI
ICl
I I I
;1 ~I ~I
~
N
..
z
8
....
~ ~
UI
I!!
S I
~ I
~ i
::I "
~ i
III
N
...
z
8
...
<(
...
UI
Z
o
...
....
<(
>:.
1&1.'
...J~
1&1 .
.... ~
~~
I&I~
GI
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Chase, Susan
Thursday, June 05, 2003 2:06 PM
Wells, Wayne
Fred Thomas's offer to the City
Wayne - At the May 15th Commission Meeting the item was discussed, the following info is from the
minutes of that meeting. The minutes should be approved at tonight's Commission meeting.
Assistant City Manager Garry Brumback reported Heritage Village has no interest in relocating to the
park the railroad station offered by Fred Thomas. Heritage Village will be in touch with Pinellas County
regarding possible use of the building as a Trail Head. The City has no nearby properties available for this
structure's relocation.
Tom Sehlhorst requested consideration of fees in order for him to relocate the railroad station onto his
property. Mr. Brumback said that request would not be prudent and recommended Mr. Sehlhorst contact Mr.
Thomas regarding this issue.
The City Manager will send a letter to Mr. Thomas, declining his offer.
Susan Chase
Official Records & Legislative Services
(727)562-4099
1
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
'"
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
5/27/2003
5:51:52PM
FLDA008 Amendment Application 4/15/2003 None DONE WW 5/2/2003
Received WW
FLDD080 Engineering Review 12/20/200~ 5/9/2003 5/9/2003 None DONE SR 5/9/2003 5/9/03 - Dumpster enclosure meets city standards.
SR
1) Dumpster enclosure to be constructed per City Standards
Detail #701, 1 thru 3 on.
FLDA245 Documents attached in 12/20/200~ None 12/20/200~
PPlan WW .
FLDA235 Letter To Abutting Prop 12/20/200~ None 12/20/200~
Owner WW
FLDA230 Letter of Completeness 12/20/200~ 4/29/2003 None DONE WW 5/2/2003
WW
FLDA244 D.O. Mailed Out 12/20/200~ None 12/20/200~
WW
FLDA018 Tree Survey Recd 12/20/200~ 2/18/2003 HwO DONE WW 3/4/2003
WW
FLDA130 Map Created 12/20/200~ 2/27/2003 None DONE WW 3/4/2003
WW .
FLDA016 Drainage Calculation 12/20/200~ 2/4/2003 HwO DONE RJM 2/4/2003
Recd RJM
FLDA015 Verify Traffic Impact 12/20/200~ HwO 12/20/200~
Fees WW
FLDD060 Legal Review 12/20/200~ 1/6/2003 None DONE MTP 1/6/2003
MTP
Page 1 of7
CaseActivity..rpt
~~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
5/27/2003
5:51:53PM
FLDD050 Land Resource Review 12/20/200~
FLDDOlO Stormwater Review
FLDD020 Fire Review
FLDD030 Park & Rec Review
12/20/200~
[ 2/20/200~
12/20/200~
5/5/2003 5/5/2003 None
DONE
RA
1/7/2003 4/29/2003 None
DONE
RJM
2/4/2003 None
DONE
J C
1/9/2003 None
DONE
DWR
Page 2 of7
5/7/2003
WW
4/29/2003
RJM
2/4/2003
J C
1/9/2003
DWR
5/5/03 - R_A
12/20/02 - R_A
a) Show 1he trees drip line on the Paving and Grading Plan.
MEr
b) Provide a Tree Preservation Plan. This plan must show
how 1he proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities
impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how you propose
to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pnming
and/or root aeration systems. 01her data required on 1his plan
TTUlst show actual tree barricade limits (2/3 ofthe drip line .
and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barri ..
detail. And any other pertinent informati on rei ating to tree
preservation. ~
c) It\lppears st10f1hetteesare to be removed from1he
~~~- ~. or inoh or at $48/inch
prior to iss upancy. NOTMEf
Prior to COB review 1he site plan is to address storm water
attenuation. This site win not qualify for storm water
payment-in-lieu ofretention as it contributes to a flood prone
area on Chestnut Street. The existing site has a stormwater
detention pond with an outlet control structure and pipe tieing
into 1he Chestnut St. storm system. It is recorrnnended that the
existing pond be expanded to accommodate the increased runoff
from the proposed project The revised site plan is to address all
the criteria as outlined in section H of FLEXIBLE
DEVELOPMENf APPUCA TION.(met 2/4/03)(revised plan
approved 3/29/03)
3/6/03 - Drainage acceptable, as long as Environmental (Tet.
Finch) is okay. - WW (per RJM)
1) The shown building orientation wi11 not allow the attendant
to meet 1he requirements of State of F1 orida Statute 546.141,
State Fire Marshal Rule 4A-49.004, NFPA 1, Section 28-2.8.4.3
orNFPA 30A, Section 9-4.7
2) Provide a Fire Hydrant within 300 feet of the structures and
on the same side of 1he street and of the rai Iroad tracks.
**SEE CONDmONS
No P&R Comment since nonresidential property less than 1
acre.
CaseActivity..rpt
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
5/27/2003
5:51:53PM
FLDD040 Solid Waste Review
FLDA140 Site Visit
FLDAO 1 0 Application received
12/20/200~ 5/2/2003 2/7/2003 None DONE
TJG
12/20/200~
1/13/2003 None DONE
ww
12/19/200~ None DONE
ww
Page 3 of7
5/2/2003
TJG
1/13/2003
WW
12/20/200~
WW
.
.
CaseActivity..tpt
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
FLDD012 Zoning Review
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
l2/20/200~ 5/2/2003 1/13/2003 None HOLD
ww
Page 4 of7
5/27/2003
5:51:53PM
5/2/2003
WW
town Design Guidelines
memmmdum wac;
felt the project
.~. ac; it is/nqtp~ted
~gl~~~
.J;be pqliqy directia
qpportauto-oriented usw
'ct
J d) Place the note on Sheet A3.l that the bands and accents on
structures wil1 be two shades darker than the general wal1 color
J (buff yel1ow).
e) Sign age, since not shown, may be required in the future to be
reviewed by the Community Development Board when
J submitted.
f) The dumpster enclosure must be finished and painted to
match the main retail building. Place notes on Sheet AI.I for
this purpose.
J g) A minor detail relates to the truck turning path from Chestnut
Street on SheetTl.l, as it assumes that the truck wi11 be turning
from the southernmost traffic lane across the other east bound
traffic lanes to access the site. There will probably be sufficient
area for the truck to access the site with the truck in the
Jnorthernmost traffic lane of Chestnut Street.
h) Provide the amount of interior green space (minimum Of.
percent of the paved vehicular use area) ac; part of the site da
Jon Sheet ALL
i) Provide a narrative as to the developer's intentions of the
existing train station, as to whether it wil1 be completely
destroyed, relocated or why it could not be incorpqrated into the
site design.
j) Submit responses/revised plans to a-i above prior to CDB
review.
3/6/03 - see Staff Report - ww
1/13/03 - WW
a) Dimension the width of the landscape buffer areas along
Chestnut Street, East Avenue and Court Street.
b) Provide an explanation why the terminal landscape islands
adj acent to parking spaces do not extend to the ful1length of the
CaseActivity..IJlI
~~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
5/27/2003
5:51:53PM
parking spaces.
c) Site Ulta is provided on Sheets ALl and C1.l, butthe data
is different on each !beet. Delete the incorrect Site Data from
either Sheet A Ll or CLl so there is only one place where Site
Data is provided.
d) The proposed site design does not provide adequate
vehicular traffic circulation abilities for two-way flow when
vehicles are fueling from the end pumps and/or when delivery
and tanker trucks are on-site. Traffic circulation is and will be
confusing to rmtorists when vehicles are parked in PartiCUlaT..
locations. Need to discuss traffic flow. Staffhas identified
several areas of concern regarding vehicular rmvement on the
site;
e) Note: A Unity of Title will be required to be recorded prior
to the issuance of building permits.
f) Note: Staff is not supportive of the use, as it is not
permitted under the Downtown District or the underlying land
use classification of Central Business Di&rict. The policy
directive from the City Commission is not to support
auto-oriented uses within the Downtown District.
g) Place a note on Sheet A3.1 that th e bands and accents on
structures will be darker !bades of the general waIl color. The
colors on the canopy and the main building need to match. In
addition, render the elevations for the canopy;
h) Signage, since not shown, may be required in the future to
be reviewed by the Community Development Board when
submitted. Signage location indicated appears to be greater than
the lll:lXimum six percent permitted. Signage needs to be eil.
shown at this time or all reference to signage removed from
elevations.
Page 5 of?
CaseActivity..1Jl1
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
5/27/2003
5:51:53PM
'di~ions :
cape plan is a good start but needs some
maJ:ked up the landscape plan with suggested
design applicable to the current proposal;
pportunity in the landscape areas of the site to
andscaping - instead of just plugging in india
oyster plants everywhere. Suggest planting a
of mid-sized plant in front of the silverthorn and a
t planting in front of the silverthorn (see the suggested
~; .
eri::are.~er ways to treat the entrances to the site, I ...
slocating something with more color than j ust liri ope and
indiahawt (see the suggested sketch);
d) contin ous sil verth orne hedge, break it up wi th
so h color (like hibiscus, which is recommended in
,
e) Address all of the above prior to CDB review.
12/20/02 - MTP
a) (MEf)Live oaks are spaced between 15 and 20 feet on
center. This is too close - increase spacing to about 35 feet on
center;
b) There's an opportunity in the landscape areas of the site to
provide better landscaping - instead of just plugging in almost
nothing but india hawthorn and oyster plants how about getting
a different type of mid-sized plant in front of the silverthorn and
something in front of that. I've made some sketches on the
submitted landscape plan we can copy(NOf ME'!);
c) (MEr)In the landscape island at the southwest comer Oft.'.
building there is a 35-inch oak tree to be saved. I'm concern
about digging all those holes to plan all those india hawthorns.
Provide a tree preservation plan and think about alternative
ways ofhandl ing that space to better preserve that tree;
d) I'd like to see a general tree preservation plan indicating
how the trees to remain at the edge of the retention area will do
with the grade changes proposed (NOf SURE IF THIS HAS
BEEN MET);
e) There are better ways to treat the entrances to the site. I
suggest locating something with more colour than just liriope
and india hawthorn (NOT MEI).
f) In general, the landscape plan is a good start but needs
some more work. I provided a landscape plan at the January 16,
2003 DRC meeting that, while the site plan has changed, is still
Page 6 of7
CaseActivity..1p1
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
5/27/2003
5:51:52PM
FLDD042 Environmental Review 12/20/200~
5/6/2003 5/23/2003 None
DONE
TF
FLDD090 Harbor Master Review 12/20/200~
1/6/2003 None DONE
MTP
FLDD070 Traffic Eng Review
3/11/2003
DONE
BE
5/5/2003
None
Page 7 of7
5/23/2003
RLG
1/6/2003
MTP
5/21/2003
BE
applicable to the current proposal. I suggest enlisting the aid of
a landscape professional and/or utilize the landscape plan
prepared, for free, by Staff (NOT MEr IDENTIFY PATTERN
NUMBER SEVEN);
g) Instead of a continous silverthorne hedge break it up with
something for color Like hibiscus which is recommended in the
Code. (NOT MEr)
h) Address all of the above prior to CDB review.
Vertical walls not typically permitted on the sides of detention
ponds; in no circumstance will vertical walls be permitted .
adj acent to parcels 0 f propoerty and on no trore than two si .
Stonnwater treatment and attenuation must be managed in
accordance with City of Clearwater drainage policy.
5/5/03.. B....E
Tt1,l1:ll~Itnpact
3/11/03.. B_E ..
The access entrance along East A venue poses a concern with
Traffic Operations staffbecause of the potential conflicts and/or
safety hazards associated with vehicles from the proposed site
with the recreational pedestrian and bicyclist along the Pin ell as
Trail and also the trains along the CSX railroad tracks.
2/12/03.. C_M
a) Flow of traffic on site is very poor.
b) How will deliveries be handled. .
c) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid]J1
toC.O.
CaseActivity..rpt
. .
Conditions Associated With
FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
Fire Condition Joseph Colbert 562-4327 x3028
02/04/2003 Subject to meeting all applicable Fire Codes
03/06/2003 Driveway over vault area must be built to HS-20 Bridge Design-Show prior to any permits.
Solid Waste Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
Dumpster Enclosure must be built to City specfications, and shown on detail sheet
Traffic Eng Condition
Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
There are no conditions for this case at this time.
Print Date: OS/27/2003
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
I PUDrIe InforlllDllOrIi OCR.a I' lUrfl'.~ .., .... -'J" ... --- ---."
P'ubtlc Work. Mt'A1nIltrD.1oft1E1'l9~lnlJo ond rn~' ... oc~IH
". u." by tN t.cID&eft1 .n... \he "W\dentDlW&\lJ that UUt \toto
wed .01 COIluted for Ihe putpOD of ""'011,", a -qraphlc
civr. "'vetltory. ,... sueh, the CIt)' of aHRIG'" PWA/(.
~~ ~O::~:Prt;:::t:.t :~'t~c:rt':? '::'0 for
on)' other porUculot u.e. r",ttterrnOl'e. the Clt, 0' au,weter
PWA!f. anum" f\Cl !k*lIlty wtlotuewt' o.-.odoted with the u..
Dr ",hun of wctl dalo.
fjQ![:
Thl. A'lol P<09. " subJect to pet10cJC cf\Cmqtt.
'0( InforfTlCrllon about lottlt revlllons p." col PWA!E 01
vlsll our Well sit..
N
E9
0 Iqo 2qo 400 6f
I I
SCAlE: ,. - 400'
LEGEND:
CITY LIMITS LINE
20
. 12 19
HI - 87 13 18 '10
I. 17
15 18
511lUT e
. 13/01 D
[!] rn
13/01
~ BLOCK NUMBER
1234 LOT ADDRESS
~_,.. SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
~~ OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS
. AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
. CI TY OWNED PROPERTY
MDR ZONING DESIGNATION
~1
5 - ZONE LiNE
a!;J'"
... .0
41
<02
C
--
m _ ..""In
III .... tll/f1r In
CI\ .... aI/IlltI
toUIIT
ER ER ..
2 I l
3 . i
<
\;:1. ..
~I
REVISED:
8/20/2002
..~ ... _ ATLAS__
=. . PUBllC WO~TION
- ~~;~c:,~
.'...II-._..-......,tIt,JI_...""'n-_...../"'9'-1
DlIdOIfw-=
,... 1n~'''D'' dota .. ",nl"" It)' Iht CIty. or Qeofwot"
....... __ ......_.../l"'~ and .".., .. _'ed
.... uoed ., 1M ......Itlol .Ith 1M ......,-. 1.01 1M clot.
........ - ......... ,.,. ... - .. -..... . -"'"
.._ _~ /00 ..... ... CRr of _" PWAI!:
=.:: =l~~=~:="~ ~a lor
MY DIt. perl'cul. U... furtMrlNl''' the CIty of ClNtwot..
PWAIE ...... <<'0 IIoItfIl't "'aWMwr ..-dcrled """ the .....
.. ...... f1I ..CI'I _10.
IlldE:
lhla AU.. 1MIlJ' .. "'jId to pwtcMPc chOft9ta.
'DI tdotrftOl*, owl krl_ ,......... __ cot 'WA/[ Of
... "" Welt .t..
N
E9
t lqO 2qo 4qD '0
SCAlE: 1. . 400-
LEGEND:
@ BLOCK NUMBER
1234 LOT ADDRESS
CITY LllAITS LINE
~~,:,," SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
~~;;j OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY UMITS
. AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
.
CITY OWNED PROPERTY
M DR ZONING DESIGNATION
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Gerlock, Frank
Monday, May 12, 2003 3:34 PM
Wells, Wayne
FW: FLD2002-12045 657 Court StreeLTraffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
Wayne,
I assume Bennet E. sent you this, but just in case
chip
-----Original Message-----
From: Elba, Bennett
Sent: Monday, May 05,200311:28 AM
To: Gerlock, Frank; Bahnick, Glen; Bertels, Paul
Subject: FLD2002-12045 657 COurt Street...Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
The subject above is a proposal to build a 3,200 sq.ft. convince store with gas pumps. This has been an ongoing project
with changes/modifications to the site plan and building. During the DRC case review, the need for a TIA was discussed.
It was suggested that asking for a TIA would be late in this stage of the process. The basis for asking for a TIA from the
Applicant is because the proposed use generates more than the 100 vph and/or 1,000 vpd ( a threshold commonly used
by other jurisdictions to do a TIA.). Based on the ITE Trip Generation rates (6th edition the proposed use generates
approximately:
. A Traffic Impact Analysis will be needed, if it generates 100 vph or 1000 vpd.
ITE #853 Weekday (vpd): 542.60 avg. rate x 8= 4341 vpd
A.M. Peak Hour (vph): 17.17 avg. rate x 8 = 137vph
P.M. Peak Hour (vph): 19.22 avg. rate x 8 = 154 vph
This is written just for our records and that the expected trip volumes was addressed at DRC case review.
If you have questions please call me.
Thank You.
Bennett Elbo
Traffic Operations Division
(727)562-4775
belbo@clearwater-fl.com
1
~J
.
'.
'>
cvr~
(}yY {1. I P. , \,M
o f, \A/I
y s t
-W'
April 11, 2003 .
Mr. Mike Sanders, Vice President
Clearwater Historical Society
411 Orangeview Ave
Clearwater, FL 33755
Dear Mike,
I'm not interested in going back in time. The Historical Society is dedicated to history
I'm dedicated to the future. That's where I'm living the rest of my life.
At some point in time, I will develop the property and whether I donate the Train Station
building to the Historical Soc' . arwater makes no difference to me.
Whoever takes it mllSt ove it or it will be destroye the redevelopment of property.
Thank you for your help with the photos in the Train Station. I'll put them somewhere,
right now, I'm sure where.
Kind~s/fal regards,
657 Court St.
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Corporate Office
14480 62nd St. North
Clearwater, FL 33760
(727) 531.8914
nu~
pLo U'bZ -1'lOt!6
"
., I' . "" ,-..
f '. --.' '--~ ~...'~,
/'- '_-.. r~.....,J' -",
~ ~. "-"'" "'-J ""'-"'--..-.............~, :
/ r-.;' '..'j~
_""--./ . _J-.
(./ _J.-.....1 -. ---' .......~
.
CLEARWATER HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC.
1380 SOUTH GREENWOOD AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 175
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 3%17
Jf''$-() 1
~~y~
~
J W~ fA, ~ ~ dvz.Ld /U~ ~
~p~~.fn Uv ~ S'.fud~ a-d fN PSS1--
fr/J ~~ ~~J>~t=i~~.,
..at-I 5 I?tJ ~ ipu WWfL l4' u,uU. c.. /..Ad
~ ~ ~ fp ~ + {D ~ S'(J~ '2
~ r;.~ S ~ lh1 ~UA.n ~ ZM ~~"#v {a-
~ "-'S-~ ~ P ~ ,.".Y~
~ tA? tpM ~~ c:... ~ ~ ·
o tl4 dt/8cj Vk ~ W~ ~ dAAJ r;., Ct ltftMl'
~~1>~y.wk:lf1-~~t
ch Y, ~/~ tJ.,~AA f.JIS~SO~'
0.-, ~ /l.L.U.ll J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~Pk7,,~~~5P~ho
~uJ~'
W.L (N\bJ ch~ <>U-1 ~ W-C1-U41 WJ M (AN
~ If-- c.- u p.r--/,f-I- (./~....Jn-. -~ c:.J It.
o-dv-. /U fAA ~ f., ~ (J7> ~ lMt ({ pr.o pi d
~ tPtvlA~~ ~ .
_ ----..---.- .- .
- ___..,. _..._~___. _____ __n..
t1'" · - .--
'.
.
~;{h, ~ ~O~)tAN ~J
~.~ f. ~J)h<< Cvv f-utlM'7 ;.. ~
~ ~ ~ ~S-IIe,
.fJ ~ rkv ~ w~ f.A,U ~ ~ 'f"'IA
t/n 1l:.tT~ Vk ~ c~
~ S ~ ~ /a4 'Z ~~. tflpt>h
in. f4v ~ ~ ~~. .Is ~ ~~,u-
().41 ~ t/-N 5 ~~ 'pos !./~ ?
~~)
- ~~~
~~
0u-~//.f~
fp~~
~ 5-13-03:'5:58 ;CITY CL~DEPT_
.727 562 4086
# 1/ 2
~)g..'.'/}'I:U:::>'.R..'. rwater
>-i;-;;/ ; :i</
::{\.<.; >~:,_:';1'
(j
City of Clearwater, Florida
Official Records and
Legislative Services Department
Phone (727) 562-4090
Fax (727) 562-4086
FAX MESSAGE
TO:
Cyndi Tarapani
LOCATION:
Planning
FAX NO.:
4865
COMMENTS:
Sue Phillips requested that I fax the attached letter
for your file.
FROM:
Lois Norman, (727-562-4091)
DATE:
5/13/2003
NUMBER OF PAGES THIS MESSAGE (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2
ccc,\'-Jcc,o
~€ .~ 1\)\)~
VS~.{ \ [1\~~~~
Q~~().~~~~
""~~\~~ c\-~~
~ C\~O
",,:": ':"-:"::': ~:,":',-::~-,:':,; :'::'::':'~':'. ":':':":-.-;":''',:~:~:,,;.:,:'_; :"::'::-.c;-;: ~':':':':".:"::';~:':'.~_ '. :.':~:. '\ :;'-':~:':"~:-:';~' 7;.;':_~:'~':";:~ ,";,: ;::.~ :;~'.' ,:-,.::';:-:.-.~. ':":".7'.:-:-:.~:::-:.~~....,';".":'.. ;-::-:::r.: ~:c.:"...;,.:~"'."l:: ';<;,:",:,','",:';<':'"',~->,~:-",>:''''',''''''.'~~'''' :,'''"~''', ".~.~:,~":,~.:=,.".".,,.,...., ;'::-:-"''''.'':'.,..'"'':" '. ''',..,.",~:. :,::,'"-.-.'.''''''''':'''.<:',<'''':', .".....,"..., ::." .,~..: "'.' '".-'-.''''' '-." '.-._. ,,-, '..:.'.-.'''''''' -:-._,"_.,..,.,' ..,.. '_"'. ',_, --r,-._c_..,
~.1A Y. _ ;~.' ;;~\;~D't :1558: 44: C ITY CL. DEPT.
:727 562 4086
. ~Jb ~Ubb
# 2/ 2
Y. UUl
I.
PINCH-A-PENNY
POOL-PATIO-SPA
s@
~
@
I44RO 62nd St. N. · Clearw;)tter, FL 33760 I P.O. Box 6025 · Clc:arwllrer, FT..lJ75B
'Ph: (727)531-8913 · F;lX: (727)536.8066 .
May 7, 2003
er-
Co v/:Ji€
~"-11 S "0.
~ SSIO'
~r tJ 1 11/
"'''t. f-:. . PlY 2DoJ
'11/f /4f~s'
OIY"'~y
Bill Home, City Manager
City of Clearwater
112 S. Osceola Ave.
Clearwater, PL 33756
Dear BilJ,
This is a fonnal offer to give to the City of Clearwater the building known as the
Clearwater Train Station.
You have 30 days in which to make a decision as to whether you want to accept this offer
or not.
The conditions are the following: The building must be used for non-profit purposes,
even its Jessees. There is to be no rent paid on the building - a true non-profit.
As I said earlier. you have 30 days in whicb to accept this offer and 90 days in which to
remove the structure that is located at East Street & Court Street in downtown Clearwater.
If you decline the offer, the structure will be demolished in order to develop the property.
Your immediate attention to this would be most appreciated.
Cc: Brian Aungst, Mayor-Commissioner
Frank Hibbard, Commissioner
Hoyt Hamilton, Commissioner
Whitney Gray, Commissioner
Bill Jonson. Commissioner
RE.CE.\\fE.O
~\{l.'{ 1 j I~~j
AR1MENl
PLANN\NG O~R\NA1ER
C\\'t' of CL
Porpoise Pool & P~ci~" lnc. .. Pinch A P~nny, Inc. · Sun WholCSllle S~ppJy, Inc. . The: Cepcot Corpormion
.Pool~r PII.l~ · SllnCD~st Tr:ln!lnnlT~rinn , .l\.'''l''n,,,,r r"I,"o,,~I. (".............,..
'--':"::":': ~':':"~'" ,,-....c.:~.::'_'.~_::..8":-:..-:-,-:-:-.:-.':.~..~.~~:::c:-....~..~;"'::~: ~:'!"-;--':"~~::"'"''':"';'~'',,".:;,~.,:,.:," ::",,,=,:';,,~,"'--:':~,""'='::-'~:7"""'-':"-:':-'=-~"":,:"-~.,~,'.~r:-':<,,,...:r.,,," :""':-'.'~"'C""",';<:',~'.""'''-:o.,:"":,,,,,,'''_N'''"'': ..,.: ":'~:".' .'~''''''', "'....,.,..'" ...._.cc. ,.-.,~._",..~; ".h_' ~.'~~__......~. ''''h_'_""~_:'_'''''. "_''''_"".''_'''''''_~'''''''~'''''''"''__ ..".... __'"'' ,.. ,_. ._. _ ow. "....'.~___,. ..
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tarapani, Cyndi
Monday, May 12, 2003 2:12 PM
Planning
FW: Media Update for 5/9/03
Cyndi T arapani
Planning Director
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl.com
-----Original Message----
From: Wiley, Joelle
Sent: Friday, May 09,20034:37 PM
To: Aungst, Brian; Brink, Carolyn; Oement, Betsy; FitzGerald, Diane; Gray, Whitney; Griffith, Douglas; Hamilton, Hoyt; Harriger, Sandy;
Hibbard, Frank; Jonson, William; Senior Management Distribution Ust; Shelor, George-Wayne; Weinreich, Mark; Welker, Terry
Cc: Public Communications
Subject: Media Update for 5/9/03
. Adrienne Samuels is writing a story about the events in Clearwater that are attracting more youth to the City, especially
concerts. According to the reporter, "Clearwater is now seen on the street as being hip". In addition to the concerts,
new restaurants are attracting youth. For this story she talked to Bill Horne, Tracey Bruch and Kevin Dunbar.
. Jennifer Farrell asked Bill Horne about Fred Thomas's letter offering the City the building known as the Clearwater
Train Station. In the letter, Mr. Thomas gives the land with the following conditions: the City must make a decision on
the building within 30 days, it can not be used for use other than non-profit, the City has 90 days to remove the
building from the land and there can be no rent paid for the building.
. Lori Helfland (sp?) at the St. Petersburg Times is doing story about a website at the private school that the City
Commission all signed a letter of support for. She was looking for a Commissioner comment. The website is
www.clearwatervirtualtour.ora <htto://www.clearwatervirtualtour.ora>. It is a good website with a lot of Clearwater
information.
. Tom Sewell was contacted this morning by Beach Beacon Reporter Paige Goodman referencing the denial of a Right
of Way permit for an Interconnect at Redington Beach. Tom advised Paige that we had not been officially notified of
this action yet and that we would have to review and determine what our next step was in this process to secure Right
of Way for this natural gas interconnect between Clearwater Gas System and Peoples Gas (TECO). Tom further
asked her to contact Clearwater Gas Spokesperson Kristi Cottier next week. Paige pressed for information on the
advantages of this interconnect and Tom advised her that it would allow both natural gas systems, Clearwater Gas
and Peoples Gas, to have an automatic transfer of natural gas to reduce the possibilities of outages should an
underground gas main be damaged thereby improving system reliability to both our customers, residential and
commercial, along Gulf Boulevard. Paige had a deadline of today for her article but will possibly publish additional
information later if needed.
Joelle Wiley
Public Communications Assistant Director
City of Clearwater
Phone: 727-562-4881
Cellular: 727-224-7034
Fax: 727-562-4696
1
Location:
.. .
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
fZbdl~cR-/o?O'l5' Meeting Date: Md4/,S; 2CJ63
J f
(p5 7 Co(,>rt sT:
Case No.
Ia'""" Current Use: --=:::a.~l~ sr"'t D N (rloTOfJ1 r....Q ~
~ctive Code Enforcement cas~es:
~Address number ~o) (vacant land)
IZf'Landscaping (yes) (no) N fA
~vergrown (yes)~
~Debris (yes)i!iY
,J;t-'"Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes)@
~ding(s) (goo. (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
8"I=encing on (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
ld'1'aint ~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
~rass Parking (yes) W
~sidential Parking Violations (yes ~
.ra--5ignage (none)@ (not ok) (billboard)
~arking (n/a~~) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
~mpster~ (not enclosed)
Q/'Outdoor storage (yes~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
.;" . ^ I
.
.....-...
,
,
. ....- -
Date: tf J... > D~Reviewed by: ~i'cl~ Qe BuV~
Revised 0 -29-01; 02-04-03
Telephone: X Ll7 ;)..t
II
: TO CONTACT US:
Delivery: 895-1181
News phone: 446-6397
News fax: 445-4119
B" - 'llail: northpin@sptimes.com
FILE
IMES
L
R
THURSDAY. MARCH 27, 2003
AN EDITION OF THE
~i1dtt!ibut9 mimt!i
. Hot dog stand, park are fine for now
.
Times photo -JIM DAMASKE
The Clearwater Train Station is a hot dog stand along the Pinellas Trail at Court Street. Owner Fred
Thomas wants to put a sandwich shop and gas station on the land, but planners rejected the idea.
'. Planners reject a planto
turn the Clearwater Train
Station into a gas station
and sandwich shop.
By ADRIENNE P. SAMUELS
Times Staff Writer
CLEARWATER ~ A historical
landmark and one of the city's more
interesting parks could disappear
under a proposal to add a gas station
to downtown Clearwater.
The as-yet unnamed project is
the brainchild of former city Com-
missioner and Pinch-A-Penny pool
supply store founder Fred Thomas.
He wants to tear down or give away
the brightly painted Clearwater
Train Station Restaurant, 657 Court
St. In its place would rise gas pumps
and a store selling cold sandwiches.
It's all part of a grand plan to
exploit the path to the city's new
Memorial Causeway bridge to the
beach, which will start near Court
and Myrtle streets.
"It's a major need," Thomas said.
"Plus if the city wants to bring peo-
ple downtown and all these develop-
ments they talk about building . . .
where are they. going to get their
gas?" .
The city's planning department
doesn't share Thomas' zeal for fuel
pumps. Gas stations and fast food
Fred Thomas
thinks people
will need a
place to buy
gas in a
redeveloped
downtown
Clearwater.
restaurants don't make for a down-
town that is attractive and safe for
walkers, said Cyndi Tarapani, plan-
ning director.
"In a downtown urban area, you
don't want to encourage uses that
are car-oriented," Tarapani said.
Please see TRAIN Page 5
.
.
Train from Page 1
roe planning department de-
nied Thomas' application, citing
historical significance of the for-
mer train station restaurant site,
potential traffic backup and the
area's proximity to the Pinellas
Trail, which runs. alongside East
Avenue as it approaches Court
Street. Bikers and pedestrians
would not be shielded from cars
using the station, a city report says.
Thomas has appealed to the
Community Development Board,
which is expected to hear the case
no sooner than June 17.
The gas station idea is not a
new one, Tarapani said. The one
gas,station already on Fort Harri-
so < 'grandfathered into its area.
m. ~ Jer, if that particular station
ever falls into disrepair or is not
used for an extended period, it
would not be allowed to reopen as
a gas station, she said.
In order to build his gas station,
Thomas would remove Freedom
Park, a lushly landscaped corner of
trees, tall grass, stone-looking pic-
nic tables and 10-foot-tall granite-
looking blocks inscribed with the
Declaration of Independence, the
U.S. Constitution and the Ten
Commandments. Thomas built
and donated Freedom Park to the
city in the mid '90s but is angry
because he feels the city doesn't
embrace his park.
He plans to remove Freedom
Park and place it in another city -
he won't say which one.
Also at issue is the future of the
Clearwater Train Station, a place
that sells hot dogs and hamburg-
ers and is a "mediocre business at
best," Thomas said.
The Train Station building was
once a train depot. Built in 1936,
the small shack is considered his-
torical but isn't listed on the Na-
tional Register of Historic Places.
Thomas bought the building in the
mid 1990s and originally hoped to
turn it into a welcome center and
envisioned working with the Clear-
water Historical Society.
Neither of those things hap-
pened.
Thomas owns the land beneath
the UP ARC Thrift Shop, adjacent
to the Train Station, and it would
be demolished as well. But, Thom-
as says, he'd give 20 percent of his
land sale profits back to UP ARC so
the agency could purchase a new
building.
According to city documents,
the unimproved land is valued at
$552,200. That price is expected to
rise to $2.3-million in the future,
according to the city. .
Maria Reilly was visiting Free-
dom Park on Tuesday with her
husband and daughter. They' were
out for lunch at the Train Station
Restaurant.
'This is the first time I've seen
it," Reilly said. "And to think I work
just three blocks away. It is a nice
park. What a shame."
Attorney Ed Armstrong, who
represents Thomas, said he' will
push the proposal despite the plan-
ning department's denial.
''We just respectfully disagree"
with the planning department, I
Armstrong said. 'The stated objec- .
tive of the folks who object is to
create a place where people live
and work. They're going to need
convenience store items and '
they're going to need to buy gas."
- Adrienne P. Samuels can be reached at
445-4157 or samuelS@Sptimes.com.
'Northpinellas: Hot dog stand, reare fine for now, city says e
Weather I Sports I Forums I Comics I Classifieds I Calendar I Movies
Hot dog stand, park are fine for now, city says
Planners reject a plan to turn the Clearwater Train Station into a gas station and
sandwich shop.
By ADRIENNE P. SAMUELS
@ St. Petersburg Times, published March 27, 2003
CLEARWATER -- A historical landmark and one of the city's more interesting parks could disappear
under a proposal to add a gas station to downtown Clearwater.
The as-yet unnamed project is the brainchild of former city Commissioner and Pinch-A-Penny pool
supply store founder Fred Thomas. He wants to tear down or give away the brightly painted Clearwater
Train Station Restaurant, 657 Court St. In its place would rise gas pumps and a store selling cold
sandwiches.
It's all part of a grand plan to exploit the path to the city's new Memorial Causeway bridge to the beach,
which will start near Court and Myrtle streets.
"It's a major need," Thomas said. "Plus if the city wants to bring people downtown and all these
developments they talk about building . . . where are they going to get their gas?"
The city's planning department doesn't share Thomas' zeal for fuel pumps. Gas stations and fast food
restaurants don't make for a downtown that is attractive and safe for walkers, said Cyndi Tarapani,
planning director.
"In a downtown urban area you don't want to encourage uses that are car oriented," Tarapani said.
The planning department denied Thomas' application, citing historical significance of the former train
station restaurant site, potential traffic backup problems and the area's proximity to the Pinellas Trail,
which runs alongside East Avenue as it approaches Court Street. Bikers and pedestrians would not be
shielded from cars using the station, a city report says.
Thomas has appealed to the Community Development Board, which is expected to hear the case no
sooner than June 17.
The gas station idea is not a new one, Tarapani said. The one gas station already on Fort Harrison is
grandfathered into its area. However, if that particular station ever falls into disrepair or is not used for
an extended period, it would not be allowed to reopen as a gas station, she said.
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/03/27/news....pf/NorthPinellas/Hot_ dog_stand ----park _a.shtml 3/27/2003
l\J"orthpinellas: Hot dog stand, . are fine for now, city says
.
Page 2 of2
In order to build his gas station, Thomas would remove Freedom Park, a lushly landscaped comer of
trees, tall grass, stone-looking picnic tables and to-foot-tall granite-looking blocks inscribed with the
Declaration ofIndependence, the U.S. Constitution and the Ten Commandments. Thomas built and
donated Freedom Park to the city in the mid '90s but is angry because he feels the city doesn't embrace
his park.
He plans to remove Freedom Park and place it in another city -- he won't say which one.
Also at issue is the future of the Clearwater Train Station, a place that sells hot dogs and hamburgers and
is a "mediocre business at best," Thomas said.
The Train Station building was once a train depot. Built in 1936, the small shack is considered historical
but isn't listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Thomas bought the building in the mid 1990s
and originally hoped to turn it into a welcome center and envisioned working with the Clearwater
Historical Society.
Neither ofthose things happened.
Thomas owns the land beneath the UP ARC Thrift Shop, adjacent to the Train Station, and it would be
demolished as well. But, Thomas says, he'd give 20 percent of his land sale profits back to UPARC so
the agency could purchase a new building.
According to city documents, the unimproved land is valued at $552,200. That price is expected to rise
to $2.3-million in the future, according to the city.
Maria Reilly was visiting Freedom Park on Tuesday with her husband and daughter. They were out for
lunch at the Train Station Restaurant.
"This is the first time I've seen it," Reilly said. "And to think I work just three blocks away. It is a nice
park. What a shame."
Attorney Ed Armstrong, who represents Thomas, said he will push the proposal despite the planning
department's denial.
"We just respectfully disagree" with the planning department, Armstrong said. "The stated objective of
the folks who object is to create a place where people live and work. They're going to need convenience
store items and they're going to need to buy gas."
-- Adrienne P. Samuels can be reached at 445-4157 or samuels@sptimes.com .
Home
Business I Citrus I Commentary I Entertainment
Hernando I Floridian I Obituaries I Pasco I Sports
State I Tampa Bay I World & Nation
@ Copyright 2001 St. Petersburg Times. All rights reserved
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/03/27/news-I>f/NorthPinellas/Hot_ dog_stand -park _ a.shtml 3/27/2003
.
lei L;/
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Tarapani, Cyndi
Monday, March 24, 2003 3:14 PM
Wiley, Joelle
Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank
Adrienne Samuels
I just spoke to Adrienne Samuels re the Fred Thomas case at 657 Court street which is the pro sed application for
a gas station/ Conv. store. I explained why the City staff opposes the use-not a pedestrian friendly use, history-
including two confirmations from City Commission opposing autodependent uses downtown, and the process-to
the CDB for review. I also explained that the site was historically significant and eligible to the National Register.
I think she fully understood my points-she had the staff report also. Let me know if more information needed.
Cyndi Tarapani
Planning Director
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl.com
1
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: March 18. 2003
Case Number: FLD2002-12045
Agenda Item: B 1
ObI' .-
- I -'. I -,70ft! ~
, , ,t ,1 I
l! . :, ,
I ... !
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNERS:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
PLANS REVIEWED:
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
PLAN CATEGORY:
ZONING DISTRICT:
The CEPCOT Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
The CEPCOT Corporation
Mr. Randy Wedding; Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects,
Inc.
657 Court Street
Flexible Development approval to permit an automobile service
station in the Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C.
Site plan submitted Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen Architects,
Inc.
0.95 acres; 41, 473 square feet
130 feet of frontage along Chestnut Street, 298 feet of frontage
along East Avenue and 150 feet of frontage along Court Street.
Retail sales, restaurant and park
Automobile service center (convenience store with gas pumps)
CBD, Central Business District Classification
D, Downtown District
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 1
.
.
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Utility Plant
West: Offices
East: Warehouses
South: Offices
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is nonresidential in character, with the area to
the east more industrially developed.
ANALYSIS:
Existin2 Conditions
The 0.95-acre site is a triple-fronted lot with frontages on Chestnut Street to the south, East
Avenue to the east and Court Street to the north. The surrounding area is developed with office-
type uses to the west and south, a utility plant (under construction) for the Church of Scientology
to the north and warehouse-type buildings to the east. With the construction of the new
Memorial Causeway bridge, traffic patterns accessing the beach will be re-routed to Court Street
(westbound) and Chestnut Street (eastbound). Railroad tracks and the Pinellas Trail are adjacent
along the east side of the property, within the East Avenue right-of-way.
The site is currently developed with a restaurant at the northeast comer (old train station), a retail
sales (thrift) store at the northwest comer and Freedom Park (private) on the south side. The
restaurantlhistoric train station is located immediately west of the Pinellas Trail. All existing
improvements will be razed as part of the redevelopment of the site. There are some large trees
on the southern portion of the site worthy of preservation.
Proposal
The proposal includes the redevelopment of the site as an automobile service station consisting
of a 3,200 square-foot retail sales/convenience store and two gas pump structures (one on the
north side; one on the south side). The convenience store is proposed generally midway between
Court and Chestnut Streets, on the west property line. The building is set back from all road
frontages, with parking in front. This is a suburban-style design. Access is proposed along all
three fronting streets. The required amount of parking is provided, located primarily to the east
of the store. A number oflarge trees, including a 35-inch oak tree, are being preserved.
The proposed convenience store and gas canopies will have pitched roofs, finished with
terracotta tile. The building and gas canopies will be painted buff yellow with forest green
window and door frames and accent banding in a darker shade. No specific tenant is identified at
this time, so only attached signage areas are shown. Both freestanding and attached signage must
meet Code requirements.
The applicant proposes two canopies for the pumping of gas, one on the north side of the site off
Court Street and the other on the south side off Chestnut Street. Each canopy will have four gas
pumping stations (one on each side of a pump). Insufficient vehicular traffic area will produce
on-site traffic congestion, at access points and on adjacent streets. The site plan submitted may
produce "bottlenecks" at the northern canopy. Vehicles parked at pumping stations on the north
side of the property may back up on-site traffic flow for cars and delivery trucks. Additionally,
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 2
.
.
many vehicles parked at the northern canopy could restrict a tanker truck from exiting to Court
Street. Off-site problems at the northern driveway on Court Street could also be created when
the northern canopy is utilized at full capacity. The proposed site design does not provide
adequate vehicular traffic circulation abilities for two-way flow when vehicles are fueling from
the end pumps and/or when delivery and tanker trucks are on-site. Traffic circulation is and will
be confusing to motorists when vehicles are parked in particular locations. Staff has identified
several areas of concern regarding vehicular movement on the site. The access entrance along
East Avenue poses a concern with Traffic Operations staff because of the potential conflicts
and/or safety hazards associated with vehicles from the proposed site with the recreational
pedestrian and bicyclist along the Pinellas Trail and also the trains along the CSX railroad tracks.
The drainage design under this proposal provides two small retention ponds south of the
convenience store building, as well as a vault for storage under the parking lot in front of the
building. This vault, while providing storage capacity, does not meet Code environmental
requirements for stormwater treatment. It has not been properly designed (as a bridge-type
structure) with sufficient grading to provide for delivery and fire truck traffic over it.
The site is located within the Downtown District, a designated redevelopment area. An
automobile service station is not a permitted use in the Downtown District. This request is being
processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as the only method the use can be
requested within the Downtown District. With the adoption of the Community Development
Code in 1999, automobile service station use was specifically not included as a permitted use in
the Downtown District, rendering all existing automobile service stations in the Downtown
District nonconforming uses.
Land Use
The City Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives that are applicable to this project are found in
the Future Land Use Element as stated below:
2. Goal - The City of Clearwater shall utilize innovative and flexible planning and engi-
neering practices, and urban design standards in order to protect historic resources, ensure
neighborhood preservation, redevelop blighted areas and encourage infill development.
2.3 Obiective - The City shall encourage the implementation of historic overlay dis-
tricts, the maintenance of existing historic properties, and the preservation of existing
neighborhoods through the use of design guidelines and the implementation of the City's
Community Development Code.
2.3.3 Obiective - The City of Clearwater shall continue to implement the De-
sign Guidelines, adopted in 1995, for all development within the Downtown District.
The proposal is inconsistent with these goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan because
it does not protect or maintain the existing historic property (discussed later) and does not meet
the Downtown Design Guidelines.
The Countywide Plan Rules establish a plan category of "Central Business District" which
allows cities to designate the boundaries of their urban center, prepare a specific CBD plan and
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 3
.
.
allow downtown development with mixed uses at densities and intensities greater than in other
parts of the City. Since at least 1976 when the first downtown plan was created, the City of
Clearwater has identified the downtown as an urban center and the City's principal activity
center. Over the years, there have been many downtown plans created with the current plan
adopted in 1995 entitled "Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan."
The Redevelopment Plan establishes five general goals for the redevelopment of downtown.
Two of the goals apply to this request. Within each goal, the Plan also establishes objectives and
policies. The proposal is evaluated against each goal, as follows:
1. People Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater into a successful "people place" that
attracts, retains, and inspires those of all ages and incomes to use and enjoy the community
town center.
The objectives and policies of this goal highlight the need to encourage new residents to
downtown, to encourage employment downtown through convenient transportation and parking,
and to become the link among downtown, the City at large and the beach. The goal recommends
that the downtown become a destination for beach residents and visitors while pro actively
utilizing the historic and waterfront assets as visitor options. The auto-orientation of the
proposed use will detract from the pedestrian and historic preservation objectives of this goal.
The proposal is inconsistent with the People Goal ofthe Redevelopment Plan.
2. Movement Goal: To redevelop downtown Clearwater with an efficient, high quality,
multi-modal movement system with supportive and visually positive terminal and transition
facilities for all modes.
The objectives and policies for this goal recommend establishing East Avenue as the Pinellas
Trail corridor through downtown and encourage bike movement around downtown. The
proposed use is expressly for the convenience and service of automobile users. The site
circulation includes a three access points, one on each of three road frontages, including a full-
access curb cut on East A venue/Pinellas Trail. The proposal does not encourage safety for
bicyclists. The proposal is not consistent with the Movement Goal of the Redevelopment Plan.
Downtown Plan Update
The Planning Department is currently in the process of updating the Downtown Plan. The City
Commission held its first workshop on the Downtown Plan update in October, 2002. At that
meeting, the general concepts guiding downtown development were discussed. Specifically, the
Commission agreed that automobile oriented uses, such as gas stations, convenience stores and
drive-thru facilities, shall be prohibited in the Downtown Core and including the Court/Chestnut
Street corridors. These uses shall also be prohibited at the major gateways to downtown (at a
minimum, locations include the Highland/Gulfto Bay/Court intersection). The City Commission
specifically looked at the Court/Chestnut Street corridor recognizing it as the primary access to
the beach. The City will be funding streetscape improvements to further the gateway into
downtown and the beach. The City Commission, on January 27,2003, affirmed their decision to
prohibit automobile oriented uses from the Downtown Core area and the other five sub-districts
within the Plan. Approval of the proposed (not permitted) use may encourage other inappropriate
uses.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 4
.
.
Historical Information
The City of Clearwater retained Archeological Consultants, Inc. in February, 1998 to conduct a
historic preservation survey of the Clearwater Central Business District and Old Clearwater Bay.
The resulting document, Clearwater Historic Preservation Survey and Planning Project,
identifies and documents all buildings, not previously surveyed, constructed before 1947 within
the project area. The survey was conducted according to the standards and criteria set forth by
the Florida Bureau of Historic Preservation, Division of Historical Resources. A property is
eligible for inclusion in the National Register Of Historic Places if it meets one or more of the
National Register criteria. This includes that the quality of significance in American history,
architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, site, buildings, structures,
and objects that possess integrity oflocation, design, setting materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association. Additionally, other criterion include that the property is: associated with event that
have made a significant contribution to broad patterns of our history; or, associated with lives of
persons significant in the past; or that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic
values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack
individual distinction; or has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in
prehistory or history.
Properties may be nominated to the National Register in one of three categories: as a single
(individual) property, as an historic district, or as a multiple property. The subject site includes a
building that was identified as being potentially eligible for listing in the National Register. The
site contains the Seaboard Air Line Railroad Depot, constructed ca. 1923. It is the only railroad
depot remaining in the City of Clearwater. This building is significant for its association with the
early railroad which helped stimulate the economic development and residential settlement of
Clearwater. The depot is a good example of a one-story frame combination station (servicing
both passengers and freight) constructed in Florida in the early twentieth century. The
application proposes demolishing the last existing railroad depot in the City.
Deshm Guidelines
The Downtown Design Guidelines were adopted in 1995 and serve as a guide and tool for new
development and renovation and rehabilitation of existing properties. There are two applicable
purpose statements of the Guidelines to this request:
1) To ensure an orderly. high Quality redevelopment process. Each renovation and
construction should contribute to the overall image and character of the area. The
proposal does not meet this guideline, as it does not contribute to a desired urban
character due to the proposed demolition ofthe historic depot.
2) To protect and maintain historic features. Older buildings possess character,
tradition, workmanship and a pedestrian scale that is not easily duplicated. The
City intends to preserve the historic integrity of Downtown Clearwater. The loss
of the last railroad depot in the City will forever remove this building type from
our built environment and eliminate our ability to enjoy and learn about
Clearwater's past through its historic sites.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 5
.
.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Section 2-901.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
FLOOR AREA 5.0 0.21 0.077 Yes
RATIO (FAR)
IMPERVIOUS 1.0 0.864 0.68 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO aSR)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Section 2-903):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 41,473 square 41,473 square Yes
(minimum) feet (0.95 acres) feet (0.95 acres)
LOT WIDTH N/A 130 feet along 130 feet along Yes
(minimum) Chestnut St; 298 Chestnut St; 298
feet along East feet along East
Ave; 150 feet Ave; 150 feet
along Court St. along Court St.
FRONT N/A South: five feet South: 13 feet Yes
SETBACK (pavement); (pavement);
East: zero feet East: 5.5 feet
(bldg and (pavement);
pavement); North: 5.75 feet
North: zero feet (pavement); 23
{bldg and feet (canopy
pavement) column)
REAR N/A N/A* N/A* Yes*
SETBACK
SIDE N/A West: West: five feet Yes
SETBACK (sidewalk and
dumpster); 12
feet (to bldg)
HEIGHT N/A 12 feet 21 feet (bldg); 22 Yes
(maximum) feet (canopy 1);
23 ft (canopy 2)
PARKING Determined by 41 spaces 16 spaces Yes
SPACES the Community
(minimum) Development
Director based
on use and/or
ITE Manual stds
* Per Section 3-903.D., street frontages have front setbacks and other property lines have side
setbacks.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-l2045 - Page 6
.
.
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT (Section 2-903.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
Automobile service stations are not listed as permitted uses within the Downtown
District. In order to request the approval of an automobile service station for this
property, the request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project use. It has not been demonstrated how the redevelopment of the parcel is
impractical without the requested use deviation. The applicant's response is that "no
variances other than the use itself are being requested with this application. The
project's low FAR is well below the intensity standards set forth in the Clearwater City
Codes."
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
The current assessed valuation of the site is $552,200. The anticipated value of the site
is expected to be in excess of $2.3 million. The increase in property value is not
expected to reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The automobile service station use is permitted in City of Clearwater within the
Commercial District and the Industrial, Research and Technology District (as a Flexible
Standard Development use).
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses are a mix of offices, warehouses and a utility plant (under
construction). The proposed site improvements are consistent in height and
architectural design with surrounding properties and within the Downtown District. The
proposed use, however, is not permitted in the zoning district and is inconsistent with
direction affirmed by the City Commission regarding the prohibition of automobile
oriented uses within the Downtown Core of the update of the Downtown Plan.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within
the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the
City of Clearwater.
There are suitable sites available for an automobile service station within the City. The
City specifically did not provide for such use within the Downtown District, as the use
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18,2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 7
.
.
is not consistent with the downtown area.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
Although the application represents a financial investment for this site, the design, use
and circulation aspects of an automobile service station will negatively impact the
intended, long term character of the surrounding area. The proposed use is contrary to
the Community Development Code and will negatively impact the redevelopment of the
Downtown Core. Further, the proposal is inconsistent with the goals and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan because it does not protect or maintain the existing historic
property and does not meet the Downtown Design Guidelines.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
The site design for this automobile servIce station is a suburban in nature and
inappropriate for an urban downtown setting. This proposal is dependent upon the
automobile, dictating its design and traffic patterns. Urban downtowns rely on foot
traffic with buildings and sites designed to be pedestrian friendly. The design does not
create a form and function that will enhance and further an urban downtown character.
The site layout will create on-site traffic congestion at access points and on adjacent
streets. The stormwater design does not meet Code.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposal is not requesting flexibility in regard to lot width, setback requirements
(none in Downtown District), height or off-street parking. Flexibility has been
requested for the type of use only, specifically an automobile service station, that is not
permitted in the Downtown District. It may discourage the appropriate redevelopment
of the area.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposal is for a 3,200 square-foot retail sales building that requires 16 parking
spaces (five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area). The proposal provides the
required amount of parking on-site. On-street parking is not expected. The applicant
has provided a loading/unloading area for tanker gas trucks on the south side of the
building. A loading area is designed on the north side of the building to access service
doors on the west side of the building via a seven-foot wide sidewalk.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 8
.
.
10. The design of all building complies with the Downtown District design guidelines
in the Division 5 of Article 3.
The Design Guidelines for Downtown were created, in part, to ensure an orderly high
quality redevelopment process and to protect and maintain historic features. The
guidelines recommend that the location of off-street parking should be to the interior
side yard or rear yard of the site. No off-street parking should be in front or comer side
yard of the site where parking is highly viewable from adjoining street rights-of-way.
The proposal includes a suburban-style layout with parking along the street frontages
and building to the rear. It is inconsistent with the Design Guidelines. The utility plant
to the north is being constructed with a Mediterranean revival style with a terracotta tile
roof. The proposed building and canopies on this property will be a similar
Mediterranean revival style, also with terracotta tile roofs. Landscaping along street
frontages and interior to the site will also be provided.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The character of the surrounding area is primarily offices and warehouses, with a utility
plant under construction to the north of this site. Most surrounding buildings are one-
and two-story in height and with a zero setback. The proposed building and canopies on
this property will be one-story in height. The layout is not urban, as the parking is located
along the street with the building to the rear. It is inconsistent with other properties.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The Planning Department is currently in the process of updating the Downtown Plan.
The City Commission discussed the general concepts guiding downtown development
and specific character districts at two separate meetings. Specifically, the Commission
agreed that automobile oriented uses, such as gas stations, convenience stores and drive-
thru facilities (including fast food restaurants), shall be prohibited in the Downtown Core,
including the Court/Chestnut Street corridors. These automobile oriented uses shall also
be prohibited at the major gateways to downtown (at a minimum, locations include the
Highland/Gulf to Bay/Court intersection). Approval of the proposed use may encourage
other like uses and may be detrimental to the downtown plan efforts. Redevelopment of
this site, however, will not reduce the value of abutting properties. The current assessed
valuation of the site is $552,200. The anticipated value of the site is expected to be in
excess of $2.3 million.
Staff Report - Cormnunity Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-l2045 - Page 9
.
.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
There are no residential uses within close proximity of the subject property. Vehicular
traffic for this proposal is anticipated to utilize driveways proposed on Chestnut and
Court Streets. While there is a driveway proposed on East Avenue, its use will be
secondary to the other proposed driveways. The Pinellas Trail is within the East Avenue
right-of-way adjacent to the east side of the property. Landscaping along the street
frontages will separate on-site vehicular traffic from pedestrian and bicycle traffic on the
Pinellas Trail.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Chestnut and Court Streets abut the subject property on the south and north sides
respectively. These are one-way paired streets that will become the access to and from
Clearwater Beach. Traffic for the proposal will primarily utilize these roadways for
access. The site plan provides the required amount of parking.
The applicant proposes two canopies for the pumping of gas, one on the north side of the
site off Court Street and the other on the south side off Chestnut Street. Each canopy will
have four gas pumping stations (one on each side of a pump). Popular gas stations often
have most pumping stations full. Insufficient vehicular traffic area will produce
bottlenecks on-site or onto the streets at driveways. The site plan submitted will produce
such bottlenecks at the northern canopy. Vehicles parked at these pumping stations on
the north side can back up on-site traffic flow for cars and delivery trucks, as well as the
trash truck. Likewise, many vehicles parked at the northern canopy can restrict the tanker
gas truck from exiting to Court Street. Off-site backups at the northern driveway on
Court Street can also be created by many vehicles fueling at the northern canopy. On-site
traffic congestion has not been minimized.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The existing character of the surrounding area is primarily offices and warehouses, with a
utility plant under construction to the north of this site. Most surrounding buildings are
one- and two-story in height with nondescript architecture. While the proposed building
and canopies will reflect a Mediterranean revival style, the use is inconsistent with the
intended/proposed character of the area.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
This automobile service station will operate from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. daily. Deliveries will
generally be made via box trucks, beverage trucks and/or semi-tractor trailer trucks daily.
There may be conflicts with deliveries should all pump islands be in use. The dumpster
will be located at the northwest comer of the proposed building and will be screened from
VIew.
Staff Report - Conununity Development Board - March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 10
.
.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on January 16 and February 13, 2003. Inconsistencies with the Clearwater Downtown
Redevelopment Plan and pending Downtown Development Plan update are significant and have
impacts beyond the borders of the proposed amendment site. In particular, an automobile
oriented use in the heart of downtown does nothing to further the designed pedestrian orientation
of an urban center. In addition, the proposed site plan is not properly designed and conflicts with
the Pinellas Trail. When evaluated against the Redevelopment Plan, the Comprehensive Plan,
the Design Guidelines and Community Development Code, the proposal is inconsistent with the
goals and recommendations. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible
Development application to permit an automobile service station in the Downtown District (as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project) under the provisions of Section 2-903.C for the
site at 657 Court Street, with the following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The proposal is inconsistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, Redevelopment Plan and
the Downtown Design Guidelines;
2. The proposal is inconsistent with and prohibited within the Downtown Core of the pending
update of the Downtown Plan;
3. The proposed automobile service station is not a permitted use within the Downtown District;
4. Approval of the proposed use may encourage other like uses and may be detrimental to
downtown redevelopment.
5. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803;
6. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
7. The site design will create on-site and off-site traffic flow congestion at the northern canopy.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Wayne
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
Staff Report- Community Development Board- March 18, 2003 - Case FLD2002-12045 - Page 11
00 Original
o Update
(give site #)
..
HISTORICAL STRUCTURE FORM
FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE
Version 3.0 11/96
Consult Guide To Historical Structure Forms for detailed instructions.
Site #8 PI8422
Recorder #
Field Date 07/16/97
Form Date 10/23/97
Page 1
Site Name{s) (address if none) Seaboard Air Line Railroad Depot
Survey Clearwater Survey and Planning
National Register Category (Please check one: consult with Site File before using last four):
Multiple Listing [DHR only]
Survey #
00 building r structure 0 district U site 0 object
Address (Include N,S,E,W;#;St.,Ave.,etc.) 657 Court Street
Cross Streets (nearestlbetween) S. East Avenue/S. Garden Avenue
Cityrrown (within 3 miles) Clearwater In Current City Limits: [Xl y
County Pinellas Tax Parcel #(s) 162515186480130090
Subdivision name Court Square Block 13
Ownership (Please check one): 00 private-profit LJ private-indMdual LJ city 0 county
[] private-nonprofit D private-unspecified c:::J state 0 federal
Name of Public Tract (e.g., park)
Route to (especially if no street address) SW corner of S. East Avenue and Court Street
I ! n
n unknown
Lot 4
o Native American
o foreign n unknown
USGS 7.5' Map Name & Date
Township 29S Range 15E
Landgrant
Plat or other map
Clearwater 1974 (Photo revised 1987)
Section 16 1/4 section: --.J NW D SW
UTM: Zone 116 017
[J SE
Easting
00 NE 0 Irregular-name:
Northing
''i',,*;Style* Frame Vernacular Exterior Plan* Rectangular
'" Structural System{s)* Wood frame
Foundation: Type{s)* Continuous Material{s)* Poured concrete footer
Exterior Fabric{s)* Stucco
Roof: Type{s)* Hip Material(s)* Composition shingles
Roof secondary strucs. (dormers etc.)- Hip dormers
Chimney: No Material{s)* Location{s)*
Windows (types, materials, etc.)- DHS; wood; single; 6/1.
Number of Stories 1
Main Entrance (stylistic details) Four entry doors (2 at E. elevation & 2 at W. elevation); three light transoms; one-light doors.
Porches: #Open #Closed _ #incised ~ Location(s) S/N/EIW
Porch roof type(s)
Exterior Ornament Continuous colonnaded incised galleries; columns on brick piers. Bay windows at E. & W. elevations. Boxed
cornices. Hip dormers at N & S ends feature lattice paned windows.
Interior Plan*Combination Station
Condition (Please check one): 0 excellent I x good n fair --.J deteriorated U ruinous
Surroundings (N=None, S=Some, M=Most, A=A1Vnearly all): A commercial residential institutional undeveloped
Ancillary F eatu res (No., type of outbuildings: major landscape features. Use continuation sheet for descriptions of interior, landscaping, etc)
Archaeological Remains none noted [J Check if Archaeological Form completed
.Consult Guide to Historical Structure Forms for preferred descriptions (coded fields at the Site File).
HR6E06308-96 Florida Master Site FileIOivision of Historical ResourceslRA Gray Building/500 South Bronaugh Street, Tallahassee, Fl 32399-0250
Phone (904) 487-2299ISuncom 277-'1299/Fax (904) 921-0372/E-mail fmsfile@mail.dos.state.f1.us
Computer File P:\FSF\DOCS\FORMS\SS JORM_ V3.0DOC
fleE fU) 2OtJZ' /zoC/5
Page 2
.ISTORICAL STRUCTURE ..M
Site # 8 PI8422
Dates
Dates c.1996
Dates
Approximately 1923 (year) Earlier than
Builder (last name first):
Original address
Nature. metal crimp roof replaced; interior remodeled
Nature.
(year)
Later than
(year)
Construction date: Exactly (year)
Architect (last name first):
Moves: ~ yes no" unknown
Alterations: , x ; yes . 1. no L unknown
Additions: .. yes Xl no ,--- unknown
Original Use. (give date ranges) RR Depot
Intermediate Uses. (give date ranges)
Present Use. (give date ranges) Vacant; in process of being converted to restaurant
Ownership History (especially original owner, elates, profession, etc.) 1924-50 owner:Seaboard Airline RR. Current Porpoise Pool & Patio, Inc.
.Consult Guide to Historical Structure Forms for preferred descriptions (coded fields at the Site File).
o formal archaeological survey
o informal archaeological inspection
o Public Lands Survey (DEP)
o tax records/property deeds
00 tax records only
o interior inspection
00 other methods (specify)
n past surveys search at FMSF :XJ local library research'
..xJ past sites search at FMSF 0 non-local library research
. i FL Archives (Gray Building) :....J building permits
'--.J FL Photo Archives (Gray Building) 0 demolition permits
. i occupant/owner interview 0 commercial permits
n neighbor interview 0 occupation permits
Windshield; pedestrian; Pinellas County Heritage Village Photographic Collection.
[]] Sanborn maps
o subdivision maps
o plat maps
o local newspaper files
Potentially eligible for local register? 0 yes: name register at right = no 0 insufficient info Name of local register if eligible:
'(~Individ~ally eli~ible for National R~ist~r? []] yes C no 0 insufficient info
. Potential contributor to Nat. Reg. district? lXJ yes I I no n insufficient info
Area(s) of Historical Significance (See National Register Bulletin 15, p. 8 for categories: e.g. "architecture," "ethnic heritage," "community planning & development," etc.)
Transportation; community planning and development; architecture
Explanation of Evaluation (required, whether positive or not; limit to three lines; attach longer statement, if needed, on separate sheet)
The Seaboard Air Line RR Depot is the only depot left in Clearwater. The depot is significant for its association with the railroads which
stimulated the economic development and residential settlement of Clearwater. It is also a good example of a one story, frame combination'
station constructed in Florida in early 20th century.
Bibliographic References (Use Continuation Sheet, give FMSF Manuscript # if relevant) CD:1950:20; 1947:240; 1944:336; 1941:204; 1939:197;
1937:168; 1934: 158; 1931: 166; 1926:245; 1924-25:42; 1920-21 :(Street not listed).
Sanborn Map:1923, 29-60.
Photographs (required) B&W print(s) at least 3x5, at least one main facade.
Location of negatives & negative numbers Florida Division of Historical Resources
Name (last name first)/AddresslPhone/FaxlEmaiIlAffiliatiorSherrie Stokes, Archaeological Consultants, Inc.
P.O. Box 5103, Sarasota, FL 34277-5103; 941/925-9906; Fax 941/925-9767; E-maiI102052.2203@compuserve.com
Remember: Use a Supplement for Site Forms or other continuation sheet for descriptions that do not fit in the spaces above.
.REQUIRED: (1) USGS 7.S' MAP WITH STRUCTURE PINPOINTED IN RED
(2) LARGE SCALE STREET OR PLAT MAP
3 PHOTO OF MAIN FACADE, PREFER B&W, AT LEAST 3xS
Page 4
.ISTORICAL STRUCTURE FOR,.
Site #8 P'1:- 8 &..\:l,. ~
~Wkt1.~.11tt;11H]M\ji~Uj~j;jI:j:\~1;[I;:iIt\:jIli~jjj!jjj:~;~~~;\lmml{[~~l;.il!ltMi~~j~[[[jl\jj:lI:t;i~ljljl~[~j\mmj~jj~tmji~~*iitjUI11\~:i~gill!lm\;~i.i~~
W.t~i,
::
':'-
r;::::-..
\.:::-:....
~
.C)
~
~
,~.
......: '.
,--.~
e
...,
is
<0
d;1
0.
"'", :
f:
i~}J/
; ;
'\"
_.f:}:::
*
loiN
r
53 ~ILS I 0"21'
6 MILS
CLEARWA TER, FLA. 1974
SCALE 1:24000
,5 0
MILES
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 1000(
- -
FEET
I .5 0 KILOMETERS 1 ' . 2
.'
1000 0 METERS 1000 2000
U'1lot GRID AND 1988 MAGNETIC NORTH
DEQJNAnON AT CENTER OF SHEET
Page 3
'ieSTORICAL STRUCTURE Fe.
Site #8 (>I- 8 L.\ l. A.
~::lm~1[!\1:~\ml:mlilmi:::[i*:*[\!i[l11::::\:I:l~jlll[\:\:::~!~M::\:j:jl:\:\:jl:1:1:\11:i::i::::l~\~1:*~\11:::1::BIII..H:[::1~:1~:j::!::1:i:::[~!j!l!:~:~'@m~~i},if!Il~~~~~I..mil~t%ll~~l
tJ . I I I ~
0 Val:. 7701 FRANKUN
co -297
96 ~
10
I"l 5 6 7 4 5
~ ~ 2
~ ~ ..
l.LJ ...
t j
Cl ~ . 11223-
0
14&7 9
10
16
~ ~
~ 10 ~
COURT SlREET ~
., \I) ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~
10 co 1
5 '2 3 4 5
Si:MARKLEY ST ~ 2 3 ~
)0 0 47 32 100 ~ 14
416 46 .31
49 304'0 uS . 16 17 10 9 8 7 6
50 29 140
51 28 ~ .~ !
10
..3 I
g I ~
--, I.. . -847
0
NORTH
f~n[~.i'l\~Jlillfiff*j1j~~~~:~~jjjj~:!~~!l~!:f~1~t~:il~~I~it~I.IIfiIII.1C:::::::':~':<<'" ..
.Conditions Associated With .
Case #: FLD2002-12045
3/11/2003
11:42:3 lAM
FIRl
Fire Condition
Subject to meeting all applicable Fire Codes
2/4/2003
J C
FIR 1
Fire Condition Warn NOT MET 3/6/2003 J C
Driveway over vault area must be built to HS-20 Bridge Design-Show prior to any permits.
FIR 1
3/6/2003
J C
LAND Landscape None NOT MET 3/6/2003 MTP
That a landscape plan which exceeds the intent of Code be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of
any permits.
STRM Storm Water Condition HwO MET 2/27/2003 RJM 2/27/2003 RJM
Prior to issuance of a building permit the storm water detention volume is to be increased to 6400 cubic feet per city
criteria, approved SWFWMD permit.
SWl Solid Waste Condition Warn NOT MET SWRl 1/6/2003 MTP
Dumpster Enclosure must be built to City specfications, and shown on detail sheet
SWl Solid Waste Condition Warn MET 3/6/2003 WW SWRl 3/6/2003 WW
2/7/03 - Landscape Isles need to be drawn back - TJG
3/6/03 - Landscape islands not full length of parking space. Discussed with Don Melone - WW
TERl Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET TERl 2/12/2003 CM
Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
Page 1 of 1
CaseConditions..tpt
~~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
3/11/200j
11 :40:02AM
~
FLDA008 Amendment Application 12/20/200~ None WW 12/20/200~
Received WW
FLDD070 Traffic Eng Review 12/20/200~ 2/12/2003 None HOLD CM 2/12/2003 a) Flow of traffic on site is very poor.
CM b) How will deliveries be handled.
c) Tramportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior
toc.a.
FLDD080 Engineering Review 12/20/200~ None HOLD MEL 2/10/2003 1) Dumpster enclosure to be constructed per City Standards
RLG Detail #701, 1 thru 3 on. .
FLDA245 Documents attached in 12/20/200~ None 12/20/200~
PP1an WW
FLDA235 Letter To Abutting Prop 12/20/200~ None 12/20/200~
Owner WW
FLDA230 Letter of Completeness 12/20/200~ 1/13/2003 None DONE WW 1/13/2003
WW
FLDA244 D.O. Mailed Out 12/20/200~ None 12/20/200~
WW
FLDA018 Tree Survey Recd 12/20/200~ 2/18/2003 HwO DONE WW 3/4/2003 .
WW
FLDA130 Map Created 12/20/200~ 2/27/2003 None DONE WW 3/4/2003
WW
FLDA016 Drainage Calculation 12/20/200~ 2/4/2003 HwO DONE RJM 2/4/2003
Recd RJM
FLDA015 Verify Traffic Impact 12/20/200~ HwO 12/20/200~
Fees WW
Page 1 of6
CaseActivity..tpl
~~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
3/11/2003
11 :40:03AM
....
FLDD060 Legal Review 12/20/200~ 1/6/2003 None DONE MTP 1/6/2003
MTP
FLDD050 Land Resource Review 12/20/200~ 2/21/2003 None DONE RA 2/21/2003 a) Show the trees drip line on the Paving and Gading Plan.
RA b) Provide a Tree Preservation Plan. This plan must show
how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities
impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how you propose
to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning
and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan
must show actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line .
and/or in the root prune lines ifrequired), and the tree barri ..
detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree
preservation
c) It appears that roost of the trees are to be removed from the
site - replacement will be required inch for inch or at $48/inch;
and
d) All of the above to be addressed in full prior to CDB
revi ew.
FLDDOI0 Stormwater Review 12/20/200~ 1/7/2003 3/6/2003 None DONE RJM 3/6/2003 Prior to CDB review the site plan is to address storm water
WW attenuation. This site will not qualify for storm water
payment-in-lieu ofretention as it contnbutes to a flood prone
area on Chestnut Street. The existing site has a stormwater
detention pond with an outlet control structure and pipe tieing
into the Chestnut St. storm system. It is recommended that the
existing pond be expanded to accormnodate the increased runoff
from the proposed project The revised site plan is to address all
the criteria as outlined in section H of FLEXIBLE .
DEVELOPMENf APPUCATION.(met 2/4/03)
3/6/03 - Drainage acceptable, as long as Environmental (ferry
Finch) is okay. - WW (per RJM)
FLDD020 Fire Review 12/20/200~ 2/4/2003 None DONE J_C 2/4/2003 1) The shown building orientation will not allow the attendant
J C to meet the requirements of State of Florida Statute 546.141,
State Fire Marshal Rule 4A-49.004, NFPA 1, Section 28-2.8.4.3
or NFP A 30A, Section 9-4.7
2) Provide a Fire Hydrant within 300 feet of the structures and
on the same side of the street and of the railroad tracks.
**SEE CONDffiONS
FLDD030 Park & Rec Review 12/20/200~ 1/9/2003 None DONE DWR 1/9/2003 No P&R Cotntrent since nonresidential property less than 1
DWR acre.
Page 2 of6
CaseActivity..tpl
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
3/11/2003
11 :40:03AM
FLDD040 Solid Waste Review 12/20/200~ 2/7/2003 2/7/2003 None DONE TJG 2/7/2003 see conditions
TJG
FLDA140 Site Visit 12/20/200~ 1/13/2003 None DONE WW 1/13/2003
WW
FLDAOI0 Application received 12/l9/200~ None DONE WW 12/20/200~
WW
.
.
Page 3 of6
CaseActivity..Ipl
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
3/11/2003
11 :40:03AM
FLDD012 Zoning Review
12/20/200~ 2/10/2003 1/13/2003 None
ww
3/6/2003
WW
DONE
Page 4 of6
1/13/03 - WW
a) Dimension the width of the landscape buffer areas along
Chestnut Street, East Avenue and Court Street.
b) Provide an explanation why the tenninallandscape i sIands
adj acent to parking spaces do not extend to the full length of the
parking spaces.
c) . Site filta is provided on Sheets A 1.1 and CU, butthe data
is different on each !ileet. Delete the incorrect Site Data from
either Sheet AU or Cl.l so there is only one place where Site
Data is provided. .
d) The proposed site design does not provide adequate ..
vehicular traffic circulation abilities for two-way flow when
vehicles are fueling from the end pumps and/or when delivery
and tanker trucks are on-site. Traffic circulation is and will be
confusing to IOOtorists when vehicles are parked in particular
locations. Need to discuss traffic flow. Staffhas identified
several areas of concern regarding vehicular IOOvement on the
site;
e) Note: A Unity of Title will be required to be recorded prior
to the issuance of building permits.
f) Note: Staff is not supportive of the use, as it is not
permitted under the Downtown District or the underlying land
use classification of Central Business District. The policy
directive from the City Commission is not to support
auto-oriented uses within the Downtown District.
g) Place a note on Sheet A3.l that th e bands and accents on
structures will be darker !ilades of the general wall color. The
colors on the canopy and the main building need to match. .
addition, render the elevations for the canopy;
h) Signage, since not shown, may be required in the future to
be reviewed by the Community Development Board when
submitted. Signage location indicated appears to be greater than
the maximum six percent permitted. Signage needs to be either
shown at this time or all reference to signage removed from the
elevations.
3/6/03 - see Staff Report - ww
CaseActivity..rpt
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
3/11/2003
11 :40:03AM
FLDDOl4 Landscaping Review 12/20/200~ 3/6/2003 3/6/2003 None DONE MTP 3/6/2003 see conditions
MTP a) Live oaks are spaced between 15 and 20 feet on center.
This is too close - increase spacing to about 35 feet on center
(MEI);
b) There's an opportunity in the landscape island at the
northwest comer ofthe site to provide better landscaping -
instead of just plugging in almost nothing but india hawthorn
how about getting a differenttype ofmid-sized plant in front of
the silverthorn and something in front of that I've tmde some
sketches on the submitted landscape plan we can COpy(NO~
MEr - IDENfIFY WHAT P ATIERN NlBER SEVEN I
c) In the landscape island at the southeast comer of the
building there is a 35-inch oak tree to be saved. I'm concerned
about digging all those holes to plan all those india hawthorns.
Provide a tree preservation p Ian and thinK about alternati ve
ways of handling that space to better preserve that tree (ME1);
d) I'd like to see a general tree preservation plan indicating
how the trees to remain at the edge of the retention area will do
with the grade changes proposed (Nor SURE IF THIS HAS
BEEN MEr);
e) There are better ways to treat the entrances to the site. I
suggest locating something with IOOre colour than just liriope
and india hawthorn (NOT MEr - IDENfIFY P ATlERN
NUMBER SEVEN).
t) In gen eral, the landscape plan is a good start but needs
some more work. I provided a landscape plan at the January 16,
2003 DRC meeting that, while the site plan has changed, is still
applicable to the current proposal. I suggest enlisting the ail.
a landscape professional and/or utilize the landscape plan
prepared, for free, by Staff (NOT MEr IDENfIFY P ATlERN
NUMBER SEVEN);
g) Address all 0 f the above prior to COB revi ew.
FLDD042 Environmental Review 12/20/200~ 3/6/2003 None HOLD TJF 3/6/2003 Underground vaults may not be used for stormwater treatment.
TF Underground vaults may only be used for attenuation after the
treatment volume has been accomodated in an open system
Top elevation of vault shown on plans appears to be above
grade. Vault volume inconsistent with text. Vertical walls not
typically permitted on the sides of detention ponds; in no
circumstance will vertical walls be permitted adjacent to parcels
ofpropoerty and on no more than two sides.
Stormwater treatment and attenuation must be managed in
accordance with City of Oearwater drainage policy.
Page 5 of6 CaseActivity..rpt
~~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
3/11/2003
11:40:02AM
FLDD090 Harbor Master Review 12/20/200~
1/6/2003 None DONE
MTP
1/6/2003
MTP
.
.
Page 6 of6
CaseActivity..rpt
- '}
.
V\edding
~ Stephenson
& lliargtien
DATE:
Wedding, Stephenson &
Ibarguen, Architects, Inc.
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
Phone (727) 821-6610
Fax (727) 894-4216
Professional Registration # AA - 0002922
Letter of
Transmittal
~\o/
TO: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
Planning Department
City of Clearwater
---
t (0..-
~~
~!.-\~
: Convenience Store
657 Court Street
Case FLD2002-12045
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
( ) ATIACHED
( ) COPY CORRESPONDENCE
( ) PRINTSIPLANS
( ) INVOICE
. ( ) SPECIFICATIONS
NO. OF COPffiS
1 Set
( ) UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
( ) CHANGE ORDER
( ) APPROVAL OF SUB'S
( ) CONTRAcroR REQUISITION
( ) INSPECTION REPORTS
DESCRIPTION
Drainage Calculations
THEY ARE BEING TRANSMITTED AS MARKED BELOW:
( ) FORAPPROVAL ( ) APPROVEDFORPAYMENT
( ) FOR YOUR USE ( ) FOR YOUR INFORMATION .
Cl FOR YOUR FILES ( ) FOR FURTIffiR PROCESSING
M AS REQUESTED ( ) FOR REVIEW & COMMENTS
REMARKS:
BY: ~
C.R. Wedding, President
COpy TO: File
November 1998 - csi/fonns new/l.o.t. #2
( ) FIELD INSTRUCTION
( ) CERTIF. SUBSf. COMPo
( ) OTHER (SEE BELOW)
( ) EXECUTION & RETURN
( ) PRICE QUOTATION
( ) FOR DISfRIBUTlON
( ) OTHER (SEE REMARKS)
RECEIVED
FEB~2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER.
'.
.
.
WEST COAST DESIGN INC. FAX TRANSMITTAL
.................................................................................................l.......................................................................................................................................
10681 Gulf Blvd., Suite 205 Phone (727) 368-0491
Treasure Island, FL 33106 Fax (727) 368-0589
DATE: February 25, 2003
TO: Randy Wedding
FAX No.: 894-4216
PAGES: Three incl. cover
FROM: David C. Uttell
RE: 657 Court St.
PROJ.: 03-004
MESSAGE:
VIIOL-, STo~____
~::~
RECEIVED
FEB 27 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ld WI:HG : 6121 ~I2II21G SG 'CP.:l
68S12189~LGL : 'ON X~.:I
:)N I N8 I 530 15~m 153M : WO~.:I
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET ~ N. POND
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCL
DATE 2/1712003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
716 EL. ............ 25.00
682 EL.......... 24.50
682 EL........... 24.50
398 EL.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT .
23.00 398 0 24.02 591 504
23.04 405 16 24.06 598 527
23.08 413 32 24.10 606 551
23.12 420 48 24.14 613 575
23.16 428 65 24.18 620 599
23.20 435 82 24.22 628 624
23.24 442 99 2425 635 648
23.27 450 116 24.29 643 673
23.31 457 134 24.33 650 699
23.35 465 152 24.37 657 724
23.39 472 171 24.41 665 750
23.43 480 189 24.45 672 776
23.47 487 208 24.49 680 803
23.51 494 227 24.53 687 830
23.55 502 247 24.57 694 857
23.59 509 267 24.61 702 884
23.63 517 287 24.65 709 912
23.67 524 307 24.69 717 940
23.71 531 328 24.73 724 968
23.75 539 349 24.76 732 997
23.78 546 370 24.60 739 1025
23.82 554 392 24.84 746 1055
23.86 561 414 24.88 754 1084
23.90 568 436 24.92 761 1114
23.94 576 458 24.96 769 1144
23.98 583 481 25.00 ne 1174
;~;~lI:;I:r::~I:!li!IiI~I!llil
cd W~lc:60 ~00C SC 'qd~
8BS089~LcL 'ON X~~
~NI N8I53a 15~O~ 153M : WO~~
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET - S. POND
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCL
DATE 2/1712003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
1558 EL............. 25.00
1313 ELn.. ...... 24.50
1313 EL......... .. 24.50
579 EL.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT
23.00 579 0 24.02 1078 845
23.04 598 23 24.06 1097 887
23.08 617 47 24.10 1116 931
23.12 637 72 24.14 1136 975
23.16 656 97 24.18 1155 1020
23.20 675 123 24.22 1174 1066
23.24 694 150 24.25 1193 1112
23.27 713 177 24.29 1212 1159
23.31 733 206 24.33 1232 1207
23.35 752 235 24.37 1251 1256
23.39 n1 265 24.41 1270 1305
23.43 790 295 24.45 1289 1355
23.47 809 327 24.49 1308 1406
23.51 829 359 24.53 1328 1458
23.55 848 392 24.57 1347 1510
23.59 867 425 24.61 1366 1564
23.63 886 460 24.65 1385 1618
23.67 905 495 24.69 1404 1672
23.71 925 531 24.73 1424 1728
23.75 944 567 24.76 1443 1784
23.78 963 605 24.80 1462 1841
23.82 982 643 24.84 1481 1899
23.66 1001 682 24.88 1500 1957
23.90 1021 721 24.92 1520 2016
23.94 1040 762 24.96 1539 2076
23.98 1059 803 25.00 1558 2137
IIIlilll!ilfl!I!~llllill~i
~d W~CC:60 ~00c Sc 'qd~
68S089~LcL 'ON X~~
:)NI N8I530 15~O:) 153M : WO~H
..
10:40 a.m.
'.
.
Case: FLD2002-12045 - 657 Court Street.
Owners: The CEPCOT Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
Applicant: The CEPCOT Corporation.
Representative: Mr. Randy Wedding (work: 727-821-6610/ fax: 727-894-4216/ email:
randv@weddingarchitects.com).
Location: The 0.95-acre site is located on the west side of East A venue between Court Street and
Chestnut Street.
Atlas Page: 286B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit an automobile service station in the
Downtown District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-903.C.
Proposed Use: The proposal is for the construction of a 3,200 square-foot convenience store
with gas pumps.
Neighborhood Association(s): Pierce 100 Condominium Association (Terry Turner, 100 Pierce
Street, #710, Clearwater, FL, 33756).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Mark Parry, Frank Gerlock, Lisa Fierce, Joe Colbert, Diane Hufford, Cory Martens,
Rick Albee, Don Melone, Wayne Wells and Tom Glenn
Applicant/Representative: E.D. Armstrong, Randy Wedding and Bill Davenport
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Environmental:
a) Fully concur with Stormwater (see 10 a below). Site must provide stormwater
attenuation and treatment. Not eligible for Downtown Stormwater Service District.
Address prior to CDB review. .
2. Fire:
a) The shown building orientation and design will not allow the attendant to meet the
requirements of State of Florida Statute 546.141, State Fire Marshal Rule 4A-49.004,
NFPA 1, Section 28-2.8.4.3 or NFPA 30A, Section 9-4.7. Cannot view pumps from
the store due to solid walls,
b) Provide a Fire Hydrant within 300 feet of the structures and on the same side of the
street and of the railroad tracks.
c) Address the above (2 a - b) prior to CDB review
3. General ens!ineerin2:
a) Need an engineered site plan showing all existing and proposed utilities, drainage,
etc. prior to CDB review.
4. Harbor Master:
a) No comments
(:I
.
.
5. Land resource:
a) A 28-inch oak tree located within the south island in front of the proposed
convenience store has the curb cut too close to it -The tree does not appear to be in
the best of shape and should probably be removed. That island should shift south one
parking space;
b) A 24-inch oak and a 36-inch jacaranda, shown on the survey, appear to be trees to
remain on the west side of the site but the location of the trees on the site plan are not
consistent the location indicated on the survey - label all trees to remain and to be
removed on the site with dbh (diameter breast height) and type of tree;
c) A 35-inch oak tree located on the north side oflot 11 is to be removed but the tree is
an excellent tree. The site plan should be redesigned to accommodate the tree;
d) Utility plan required in order to better understand the impacts to the root system of
the trees to remain;
e) It appears that most of the trees are to be removed from the site - replacement will be
required inch for inch or at $48/inch; and
f) All of the above to be addressed in full prior to CDB review.
6. LandscaDinl!:
a) That the view triangles at the southwest comer of Court Street and East Avenue and
the northwest comer of Chestnut Street and East Avenue be shown; and
b) The landscape plan is a great start - I've provided a landscape plan that more meets
the intent of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project.
c) All of the above to be done prior to CDB review.
7. Parks and Recreation:
a) No comments.
8. Planninl!:
a) Provide the proposed hours of operation of the convenience store;
b) Revise the direction of the utility substation under construction under General
Applicability Criteria #5;
c) Provide the anticipated value of the property after construction under Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #2;
d) Provide on Sheet A1.1 the location and setback from property lines for freestanding
signage. Additionally, provide the design, height, color and elevation (front and
side) of proposed freestanding signage (monument signage preferred) and attached
signage. Signage must meet Code requirements. Ensure freestanding signage is not
located within any sight triangles, which also occur on the site at street intersections,
and work together with proposed landscaping;
e) Revise the existing gross floor area and building coverage on Sheet ALl, including
both buildings;
f) Revise the proposed building coverage to match the gross floor area of 3,200 square
feet on Sheet A 1.1. The gas canopies are structures, but not buildings;
g) Revise on Sheet ALl the proposed FAR to include only the enclosed building floor
area of3,200 square feet;
h) Revise the proposed height of the building and gas canopies in the Site Data on Sheet
ALl to the mid-point of the roof structure. Additionally, provide the same height
dimensions on the Exterior Elevations on Sheet A3.1;
i) There is a discrepancy of proposed building/structure color between Sheet A3.l and
the rendering in that the gas canopy columns and trusses are called out as driftwood
gray (preferred), yet the rendering indicates a red color. Provide the proposed trim
color and stucco band color;
j) Still unclear as to whether the 10 feet of additional right-of-way along Chestnut
Street indicated on Sheet A 1.1 has already been dedicated or is proposed to be
dedicated. Advise. If already dedicated, ensure it is noted in the legal descriptions;
k) Revise legal description on Sheet ALl to the current, correct legal description on the
survey submitted by Brendla and Associates;
.
.
1) In the resubmission material for the Community Development Board, delete the
survey by Cornerstone Engineering and Surveying and insert the survey by Brendla
and Associates;
m) A Unity of Title will be required to be recorded prior to the issuance of building
permits;
n) Staff is not supportive of the use, as it is not permitted under the Downtown District
or the underlying land use classification of Central Business District. The policy
directive from the City Commission is not to support auto-oriented uses with the
Downtown District;
0) Address the Downtown Design Guidelines and how the application meets them in
writing;
p) Reduced, rendered elevations will be required prior to CDB review.
q) Address all of the above prior to CDB review.
9. Solid waste:
a) Dumpster Enclosure must be built to City specifications, and shown on detail sheet
prior to CDB review (See City Standard Detail #701, 1 thru 300.)
10. Stormwater:
a) Prior to CDB review the site plan is to address storm water attenuation. This site will
not qualify for storm water payment-in-lieu of retention as it contributes to a flood
prone area on Chestnut Street. The existing site has a stormwater detention pond
with an outlet control structure and pipe tying into the Chestnut Street storm system.
It is recommended that the existing pond be expanded to accommodate the increased
runoff from the proposed project. The revised site plan is to address all the criteria as
outlined in section H of Flexible Development Application (City of Clearwater
Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) as outlined below:
. STORMW A TER PLAN including the following requirements:
· Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all
property lines;
· Proposed grading including finished floor elevations
of all structures;
· All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
· Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of
bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
· Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
· Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all
plans and calculations
. COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City
Building Permit), if applicable;
. COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN
PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable.
11. Traffic ene:ineerine::
a. Show location of fuel storage tanks and tanker travel path prior to CDB review.
b. Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to Certificate of
Occupancy.
NOTES:
1. Send comments to Randy at randy@weddinl?:architects.com and Ed Armstrong at
mailto:ed@ibpfirm.com;
2. That 13 sets of the application and all supporting materials be submitted to Staff on or before noon
January 31,2003 in order to be scheduled for the February 13,2003, DRC meeting.
DRAFf CONDITIONS:
1. That Transportation Impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy;
2. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits.
. .
Community Response Team .
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case No. {L,Oe?OOtf1- J.:JDllS' Meeting Date:~
Location: (PS-7 Lf)()rT sr (1}fA~~l1'''')
)t. Current Use: /1D.T ~~ ~ f" " fJ
.sa-A'ttive Code Enforcement Cas~yes:
J;J-Address number~(nO) (vacant land)
~andscaping ~(no)
~vergrown (yes)@
~ebris (yes~
~operative vehicle(s) (yes)~
~Uilding(~ (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
lJ Fencing (none) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
~pain~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
~Grass Parking (yes) ~
~sidential Parking Violations (yes) GJ
rzf"Signage (none~(not ok) (billboard)
~rking (~~(handicapped) (needs repaving)
~ster~ (not enclosed)
~oor storage (ye~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
_r/~,.y N I~t!'-
Date of Review:
Revised 03-29-01
Reviewed by:
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Gerlock, Frank
Monday, December 30, 2002 2:00 PM
Parry, Mark; Wells, Wayne; Schodtler, John; Dittmer, Arden
Fierce, Lisa
FW: Neighborhood associations
Hi Folks,
Well after re-visting the Code with Lisa today we are making a slight adjustment on the notifying of Neighborhood Asso.
The Code actually reads "notice shall be mailed to any affected registered local neighborhood asso." We will make the
distance call on a case by case basis as to the perceived impact of the application. I know, this sounds "gray" , but some
will actually only be abutting properties potentially, while others may need up to 2,500 ft.
thanks,
chip
-----Original Message-----
From: Gomez, Julie
Sent: Friday, December 27,20024:22 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Furlong, Mike; Fierce, Usa; Gerlock, Frank; Parry, Mark
Subject: RE: Neighborhood associations
FLD2002-11040 - 20505 US Hiohwav 19 N. - Atlas Paoe: 300A
Seville RO Association
Association President
2640 Seville 8lvd.
Clearwater, FL 33764
FLD2002-12044 -100 North Ladv Mary Drive - Atlas Paoe: 2878
Gateway Neighborhood
Pat Vaughn
1326 Pierce St. Apt. #2
Clearwater FL 33756 461-7599
FLD2002-12045 - 657 Court Street - Atlas Paoe: 2868
Pierce 100 Condominium Association
Terry Turner
100 Pierce Street #710
Clearwater FL 33756
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wells, Wayne
> Sent: Friday, December 27,20029:41 AM
> To: Gomez, Julie
> Cc: Furlong, Mike; Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank; Parry, Mark
> Subject: Neighborhood associations
>
> Julie -
> Please provide the neighborhood associations, and contact person and mailing address, within 2,500 feet of the
following cases:
> 1. FLD2002-11 040 - 20505 US Highway 19 N. - Atlas Page: 300A.
> 2. FLD2002-12044 -100 North Lady Mary Drive - Atlas Page: 2878.
> 3. FLD2002-12045 - 657 Court Street - Atlas Page: 2868.
> If you have any questions regarding the location or size of the property involved, just ask Mark Parry or myself.
> Thanks -
> Wayne
>
1
Pinellas County Property Appr. ~10rmation: 16 29 15 18648 013 00.
Page 2 of5
16 / 29 / 15 / 18648 / 013 / 0070
27-Dec-2002 JifTI SfTlith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:42:08
Non-Residential P rope rt'Y Add ress. Use. and Sales
COfTIparable sales value as Prop Addr: 651 COURT ST
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 259. 01
sales frofTI 2000 - 2001:
0 Sale Date DR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IfTlp
Plat InforfTIation 10/1.996 9.493/ 665 162.000 (Q) I
1922: Book 005 Pgs 053- 0 11.972 3.867/ 189 70.000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 (U)
0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market: 308.700 Homestead: 0 Ownership 1 .000
Historic : 0 Use 1: .000
Assessed/Cap: 308.700 Tax ExefTIpt 1: .000
Other ExefTIpt: 0
Taxable: 308.700 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0
2002 Tax InforfTIation Land InforfTIation
District: CWO Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwate r Downtown Dev Bd View:
02 Mi llage : 24. 2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 7.498.66
1) 80 x 133 7.00 10.608.00 S
Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Dur-HofTIes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
7.498.66 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exefTIptions, Total Land Value: 74.256
2002 taxes will be :
7.498.66
Short Legal COURT SQUARE BLK 13. E 81N OF LOT 6 8c
Description ALL OF LOT 7 8c W 30FT OF LOT 8 8c N 1/2 UAC ALLEY
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&~... 12/27/2002
Pinellas County Property APpre "l;10rmation: 16 29 15 18648 013 00.
Page 3 of5
16 / 29 / 15 / 18648 / 013 / 0070 :01
Z1-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:4Z:08
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Retail Store
Property Address: '51 COURT ST Prop Use: 3Z0 Land Use: 11
structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Spread/Hono Footing
Slab on Grade
Cone Block/Stucco
14
None
Hasonry Pillar&Steel
Flat
Built Up/Composition
Average
Carpet Combination
Drywall
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 4
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Bu il t
Effective Age
Dther Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
None
Average
Rectangle
Average
1.948
15
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base A rea 1.00 5.518 7) .00 0
2) Base Semi Finished .85 1. 9ZZ 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Descr ip tion Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT ZOOOSF 1. 00 Z.OOO 0 Z.OOO 999
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VALUE: Z.OOO
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&r... 12/27/2002
Pinellas County Property Appr. ""'jformation: 16 29 15 18648 013 00..
Page 4 of5
,......
(f)
'-
AME~Bi~
RED CROSS 12
'l
701
ANt<L I
5T 658fl
700
QURT
5T
710
feslJ,FH
IY}
o
"-
~
o
0')
51 PETE
TIMES
60
COURT
STREET
)9 60
JR 635 651 655
T ....... COURTI 3 COURT 703 705 72~
ll) CO~T
...... 51 51 COURT COURT ~OUf
lD 51 5T
: CD 51
(\j tl606
<;r HESINUT
0 J ...;)1 CHE51NUTJ J J
\ 13 14
~ 51
700 708
,...... eJ1t CHESTNUT
lI) CHESTNUT
....... CI- UT 5T
(0 51 ST
ClJ
cv
60
STREET
61.4
5D
o
".
c::r
CHtS~~.Jiwl 617
5T I~ CH
1
He~, NUl
645
CHESTNUT
51
:"T
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&}:... 12/27/2002
Pinellas County Property Appr.~ "1")formation: 16 29 15 18648 013 O.
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbin/cgi -c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&~... 12/27/2002
pinellas County Property Appr. T)formation: 16 29 15 18648 013 00.
Page 2 of5
16 / 29 / 15 / 18648 / 013 / 0090
Z1-Dec- 20 0 2 Jil"1 Sl"1i th, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:41:23
Non-Residential. P rope rty Add ress. Use. and Sal.es
COl"1parable sales value as Prop Addr: 655 COURT ST
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 259.01
sales frol"1 2000 - 2001:
0 Sale Date DR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Il"1p
Plat Inforl"1ation 1 0 11. 994 8.939/1.468 89.000 (Q) I
1922: Book 005 Pgs 053- 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 115.000 HOl"1estead: 0 Ownership 1 . 000
Historic : 0 Use 1: . 000
Assessed/Cap: 115.000 Tax Exel"1pt 1: . 000
Other Exel"1p t : 0
Taxable: 115.000 Agricultural: 0
2002 Tax In forl"1at ion Land Inforl"1ation
District: CWO Seawall: Frontage:
Cl.earwater Downtown Dey Bd View:
02 Millage: 24.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Jaxes: 2.193.48
1) 10 x 133 1.00 9. U2. 00 S
Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Dur-Hol"1es 4) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
2.193.48 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
Without any exel"1ptions, Total Land Value: 64.914
2002 taxes will be :
2.793.48
Short Legal COURT SQUARE BLK 13. LOT 9 & E 20FT OF
Description LOT 8
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=l&c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/27/2002
Pinellas County Property Appr. !)formation: 162915 18648013 O.
Page 3 of5
16 / 29 / 15 / 18648 / 013 / 0090 :01
21-Dec-2002 Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:41:23
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Retail Store
Property Address: 655 COURT ST Prop Use: 325 Land Use: 21
Structural Elements
Founda t ion
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Continuous Footing
Slab on Grade
Fral1le stucco
o
None
None
Gable & Hip
COl1lposition Shingle
Average
Hard Tile
DrYlllal1
o
.
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 8
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Qual i ty
Year Bu il t
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
None
Average
Rectangle
Average
1.915
10
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 1.200 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch .30 2.000 B) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Unite Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 5000SF 1. 00 5.000 0 5.000 1.998
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 5.000
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~g]
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbinlcgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p:... 12/27/2002
Pinellas County Property APpr. """,formation: 16 29 15 18648 013 Ooe
\J
Page 4 of5
T} ..JL&,J
:J 704 710
......, ffsUfT
'T OURl
ST ~g
....... b24
(f)
..... COURT >-
0 AtvlERfrlAN 57 PETE
f'I') RED CROSS 12 TIMES ~
COURT
STREET
635 13 651 655 I" 703 705
COURT COURT CO~T ,,125
ST 51 COURT COURT ,.OUR
ST 5T 51 :E:
tl606 S
HES1NUT
J .;;:} CHESTNUTj J J
13 ST 14 In
70B
624 700 CHESTNUT
CI- E51N UT CHESTNUT ST
51 ST
\
U1
STREET
50
CHE6~+~T CH 617 bill "
.;:J11H .Nl:r JT
Sf ST 631
645
HESTNUT CHESTNUT
S1 51
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/27/2002
. Pinellas County Property APp.r T~rormation: 16 29 15 18648 013 O.
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
Back to Search Page
An explanation of this screen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?0=1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=. 1 6&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p:... 12/27/2002
.1. ""t;:)- -
~e\las County PrOPerty Appraiser <_(oltion: 162915186480130070
U_Dec-2.0OZ J il"'\ Sl"'\ith, CFA pinellas county property APpraiser 09:41:40
uacant. propert.'J use and sales
COl"'\parable sales value as prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2002, based on census TraC t : 159.01
sales frol"'\ 2000 - 2001:
0 sale Date DR Book/paee price (Qual/UnQ) vac/II"'\P
Plat InfOrl"'\atiOn 10/1.996 9.4931 661 138.000 (M) I
1913: Book 001 pes 010- 0 11.974 4.1461 131 %%.000 (Q) I
1914: BooK 003 pes 043- 0 10 01 0 0 ( )
0000: BooK pes - 0 10 01 0 0 ( )
2002 value EXEMPTIONS
Just/MarKet: 16.100 HOl"'\estead: 0 ownershiP ,. .000
Historic : 0 use ,,: .000
Assessed/cap: 16.100 TaX Exel"'\P t ,,: .000
other Exel"'\P t : 0
T axab le: 1fr.lOO Aericul tural: 0
2002 TaX In f orl"'\at ion Land In forl"'\at ion
District: CWO seawall: Frontaee:
Clearwat.er Downt.own DeY Bd View:
02 Millaee: 14. 1911 Land Size unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth price units Meth
02 Taxes: 1.848.55
1) 71 x 166 1.00 11. 18Z. 00 S
special TaX CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Wi thout the save_our-HOl"'\es 4) 0 X 0 . 00 . 00
caP, 2002 taxes will be : S) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1.848.55 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without anY exel"'\ptions, Total Land value: 89.414
2002 taxes wi 11 be .
1.848.55
Short Leeal MAGNOLIA PARt< Blt< 13. lOTS 10 AND 11
Description lESS ST lit lESS W Z3 FT lit S 111 Of AllE" ADJ
15 I 29 I 15 I 54450 I 013 I
.
0100
"Building Information
_ ",'_I^.,;_click~O'" 1 &a~ 1 &h'= 1 &c~ 1 &I'" .16&s~4&t'= 1 &n~&{." 1212712002
pinellas County Property AP.er ....,formation: 16 29 15 18648 013 .
Page 3 of5
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 013 / 0100
21-Dec-2002 Ji~ S~ith. CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10
09:42:40
Vacant Extra Features
Oescr ip tion Oi~ensions Price Uni ts Value RCO Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[f][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&8=4&t= 1 &u=O&t:... 12/27/2002
Plnellas County Property APpr. T""formation: 162915 18648013 O.
"',,,
U')
......
640
PsUf
~
624
COURT
AMERftlAN
RED CROSS 12
700
OURT
5T
~
8~
ST PETE
TIMES
o
(T)
COURT
STREET
635 13 651 655 703 705
I COUR1 COURT COURT ~725
5T ST 5T COUR1 COURT OUR
5T ST 5T :I:
l606 I-
HESTNUT :~
if 0,.} CHE~tNUTj J J
/3 14 ~:
708
624 + 700 CHESTNUT
CI- ESTN WT CHESTNUT ST
5T 51
,
STREET
50
CHeSOT9~T CI- e~M~ \
JT
5T 51 631
HESTNUl 645
CHES1NUT
ST 51
504
MYRTLE
r- - ~ AVE
L9462~ 19 /8
50
606 508
1URNER EtVlT
~T
Page 4 of5
,
a:
>-
~
fit
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l&c= 1 &r= .16&s=4&t=I&u=0&~... 12/27/2002
, ". Plnellas County Property Appr" T"lformation: 162915 18648013 0<.
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&r... 12/27/2002
Pinellas County Property Appr. T"}ormation: 15291554450013 01.
Page 2 of5
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 013 / 0120
27-Dec-2002 J il'l Sl'lith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:43:32
Uacant P rope rty Use and Sa~es
COl'lparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 259.01
sales frol'l 2000 - 2001:
0 Sale Date DR BooklPage Price (Qual/UnQ) VaclIl'lp
Plat Inforl'lation 1011. 996 9.493/ 667 138.000 (M) I
1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 0 /1.973 4.051/ 894 Z7.000 (Q) I
1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Jus t I Marke t: 52.400 HOl'lestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 52.400 Tax Exel'lpt %: .000
Other Exel'lp t : 0
Taxable: 52.400 Agricul tural: 0
2002 Tax Inforl'lation Land Inforl'lation
District: CWO Seawall: Frontage:
C~earlllater o olllntollln Dev Bd View:
02 Mi 11age : 24.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 1. 27Z. 85
1) 53 x 166 7.00 8.814.00 S
Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Hol'les 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1.272.85 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exel'lptions, Total Land Value: 61. 698
2002 taxes will be .
.
1. 272.85
Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK B LK 1 3. E 30FT OF LOT IZ&:
Description S 1/2 OF ALLEY ADJ. LESS ST II W Z3 FT 0 F LOT 11 LESS
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinfcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&~... 12/27/2002
Pinellas County Property Appr.T~formation: 15 29 15 54450013 O.
Page 3 of5
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 013 / 0120
Z7-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10
09:43:30
Vacant Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Vear
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[I][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&r... 12/27/2002
. Pinellas County Property Appre T"'1formation: 1529155445001301.
Page 4 of5
......
(JJ
.....
624
COURT
AMERDN 12
RED CROSS
8'
~
6s8p1
ST PETE
TIMES
o
M
60
COURT
STREET
19 60
IR ".... 6;35 13 C8~~T 655
r ll) COURT COURT C6~jT C6s8FT 725
'-' 5T 5T 5T f-OUR
to
~ 0) ST
ru t606
'<:3'" HESTNUT
0 I ... CHESTNUT) 1 J
"- 14
"\l"" 13 ST
.r-. 624 + 700 CHE'~l~U1
(/) Ct- UT CHESTNUT
..... ESTN
ill 5T ST
m I
<l.I
BO
61.4 50
CHE6s0T9~T 617 hlQ \
0 JT
"- ST Cr 51 sF
v 631 CHt~~Ui
- 'HESTNUT
tT ST
..:. 504
MYR1LE
r- - :-I AVE
~462~ 19 18
\J 50
) 509
;: TU~~~R EAST
o;'T AVE
STREET
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&~... 12/27/2002
. Pinellas County Property APpr. T~formation: 15291554450013 O.
Page 5 of5
PineIlas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&~... 12/27/2002
LL
.
.0
>-
-
U
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: _\~..~ ~ r-fH"d-\~...
FAX: . '577 ~ 9 '=t 32-
Phone: Sf \:1... .7 r 4- ~
FROM: \,..J~",Q - '\--.}i\~
DATE:~ \'--h- 7\ ~ ~
Phone:~ to "2-~,s-04:
RE: lQS7 c.ovrt- s+--
MESSAGE: P, r \:ilK at l' i'J"for~J & .. v+ J J II r \JJ~F '/L .
NUMBER OFPAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 2-..
DATE, TIME
FAX NO. 1 NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
SMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
12/27 10:26
95779932
00:00:57
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 12/27/2002 10:27
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
~ reffJOB NO. ajL' 'J- - 7 '!
DATE: I:L-~u -02-
RE:~~Y,1!<.} of A7Z;=;;J,
-yJ C:;/;Y J7Y tJ;:: ~ P 7
6vJ2.7 ~. J
\ .
JOHN C BRENDLA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
4015 82ND AVENUE NORTH
PINELLAS PARK, FL 33787
Phone: (727) 576-7546 F~1-'.57 7, ,,)2..
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
TO:
ATTENTIONdj.Jv't: vt1=.J.ls
WE AR SENDING HEREWITH:
o RRESPONDENCE 0 PERMIT APPS
PRINTS 0 FOR YOUR USE
o SHOP DRAWINGS 0 SIGN & RETURN
o SPECIFICATIONS 0 TRACINGS
o 0
.J~II
MARK:
o NE No Exceptions Taken
o EN Exceptions Noted
o ER Exceptions Noted - Resubmit
o R Rejected - See Remarks
MARK
COPIES
REMARKS:
o 1 ST S
DELIVERED
o PICK-UP
o OTHER
cc:
(,s-? Cowr+
~ 277A
<(
co
00
('\I
~
g'
:s2
"C
~
"
0
Pi
0
g;
N
0
~
;;:r
~
0
t
I
~
III
!
rJ
!l
!!J.
c
en
~
I
----;-----
..... "'''i l~~
,-- ----
/ ...
I
I
...."- t- -=--=--=-
~.
')
r"'PUO~. ilo.r
-
._ CITY o~ ~WATER
PIIIILLAS eoum. nARIDA
· __11'I
!!:.. P1llILIC WORKS ADIIIHIS'l'RATIOH
- -
;:~~a;:.~~
1ltIpo/~...__/OA~_~~1
-
_ ..__ dolo to _ ., ... CIty of Qocn<<tt
::"..:= ===a..~-='J:t "::'J:
___""..._oI-...,........,rc
..__ _,. ,.. -. 1M CIt, of __ PWIo/t.
:::.: =~-:.:.#t:' ::r_~ ~....
an, ..... ....... .,.. Furl........... the CRr 01 Clear"""
.....Il ....... no ___, ........... ....... ..... IN usa
. ...... '" tuCh data.
i'
IIII1El
_ ....... _ to ...... 10 porIo4Io _
rOl ..- _ _ ...-. _ ... PWA/t -
....---
EB
.
b; 2l/P 410
SCAlE: ,. - 400'
600
I
LEGEND:
@ BLOCK NUllBER
1234 LOT ADDRESS
---- CITY L1Iol1TS LINE
'4 ,7
15 16
,
rn D
'3/111
~
~~
SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY UIIITS
.t.
AGREEIIENT TO ANNE~
. CITY OWNED PROPERTY
MDR ZONING DESIGNATION
\e
-.--- ZONE LINE
-
m - IO/Intn
11I_'''''''''
13--
REVISED:
8/20/2002
ZONING ATLAS
NE 1/4 or SECTION 2868
16 - 29 S - " E
~S'1J C."rol- ~.
~ 28E A
J.fJl cgA~o Bt8f!17
'I YK.A-A,..m
{ PRELUijE 80 4 3
CONDO I REPLAT ~ 2'
, _.i6~ I I !I
I..... ..,
~'f;'rl I HARBOR
4t ~~E
I CONDO
I 14-21,
~,.
a
~~
'" 4 If It~ .ll.!11
I- 5111113( I { (~, 1""1
~4 ~s , --;- '- '12 ':-
_~ ' S(~' ~~i, ~'7'
__I ~.~,o ~ ~
7 I~! j~ m !. ~
a .,
2, I I
. ,
A 286B
~l I L 50J I :zg I
· I 51 L.r-a-
~ ~,~I4
'"IT 3~' , ..
..;.;... AotE'" AtTRaT t
I' ~~ ; .(~
. li~.l. I ., 2 ,
~I(,
5fs !~
.1 @ii! :.
, 8 lH I I
2 7~v
~', IflIlllr~::
.. .~ JlI~ 1 6'
.0 ..l '0
; JIf;)
2 D. II
~
HIc:JCORY e
.-
COIRlO 16-111
~
~ ..
· ill -. !
ft ~- -~~ '
~1It I__~ J;- f=..'!!
'\ i:'" 3 -'. ~
CAlIELDT
~f~06
<(
If)
0\
N
...
... ,,; OIlUlO
Vi Ii SIO
32 30 .8 26 2' .2
A
10'/1/ 8' 81 I 59 I 57 55: 53
i--- //... I 1\ i 9
L.:f 19 JA_ I
I"'~/ j i I II! l ii I
f-- fj 16 14 8. ~60 5615815'
br/ I I S1 61
I~ 99 I 7 951 93 HAl BOR 87
J II i I i~A I ~&
I..., II II I
10. '00 98 sa r' 92 90 88
'39 'f 1135 I 133113' /'29 127 '2S 123
il I I 'Ii & 1 ~ i
LOM
II II i S II ~ .
13811'36 13' ,..I'JaI!'28 '21 '..
D>
c:
:sz
"0
~
~
rYl
o
0\
o
N
o
~
j;j
!::!.
8l
t
ai
III
~
-vi
Rl
j
i
!J.
c:
en
!
II
..
8 5
4 .31~iitI2~t\ 817 8
m r- i
-.mlIl!IIS _
28
. 3 2 ,
51 ~ 7 i-~ ,,0
'Ii I~ 8 _
,t....
ii I II .. II
,....4_ 3(~ 2 5: 101 Hl 3'
"""'32'
~ ,.. - "(
.
(I) ~
2 ,
1\1
~
11 ..
.\ 2 III
35 ,;" I
-
WAY'
e
J8 36 "..
...
85183 81
, ,
7 177 l7S 173 711
i i
CIhE
9
IS 87
..
I
r, Iii
78 174 72 701 88
1111" 1++':
e i ~i ! i . i _
PAlM II
. I~ IS::
'228 '2'" !'2C ,,8"i ,j ,,2 "0 '08 '01 '04
: l's" 13 12'" r ' D 7 D I' 4 3 --;jJl t
II e3~~'11 ~I! I'! el~~"
~ II ~
88 14 12 Il80 78
'2181121.1 + "7 I"S ,
/III' i nl i ~ i i
-
13013Slls.I.IJI2I,I.f~1,
e '11,2/02 r ,...
'21b,-a 12/01
I
~,J IliJ~!
S'IllU7
...,41
~
"l:'
..,
S i I
2 I
8 \2 ~ . t
S 8 7 ,,.,
I &. I I '01":
. ..-.oCT I 87 I
ii 1,&1 II
'% 11 liol 1 .
.
5"",
I'~
I--'--
7
8'
ii
-
1~1I6I~'1I
fA '0,.
I
... S.
,.u I
/ ,
I 1,1 ii
~, 2'
~ ...
--:;- -
'0 " ~
~
I
, 2 3 .
fB;~'3~'
I -Q!r
10 I' 8 7
I
i i III
8
,
.
(~'
I
I
-..
.
I I !
III ,
-
... 2 "10 1
.. , ~
Ii
, 2
t ~ ., 0 ORUtDU.
PROFESSIONAL
II
.,'178
:;-;- I
a
CENTER
CONDO
86-121
..~
lei
~
HI 2 11
'0 , ~ ' 2
... ,
1.m...4 1718~12'
r.;;-- i ; I i
~
=--2 "'a. ,2'45878'
~ 'ilAGNOLI~
- , "
_. I 7 8 .
S 22 21 20 1lt '8 17 ': 15'
_ , I ""~.t Fi
r:-r.-rlJ!~~ · 2 3 .~ I ~ 8
~'f" ~ !t Ie
,,.. , J" Ct
I" ~ 21 ~ It .. 17 '8 15
~lIIt III .~ l! I
-- .,----
H~'II..~: 10 1.1 10 ,tilln 1&1111111'.
~pz.olJ~. J"2,~4>r
I L t1.g]~
I
I.
I ... r~'~ ·
I II
,2'451013'
1-1 ill _
I"" .. 11"
'0187" \815,.,
-PA .-'"
l.lI~I' I
s
I
Ii! 1~112
I- 3 4
1-7( ...
, 2 ,. 5
'0 ,
8 7 I
4~
. '5 ,. ,
1=
fa;"" a~ "" 1M... -
R.T,~ .,<4, 21t h ,," 'iir21 ...',,, ~ T
10-29 ,,. SlI tlw<< .- ~
I 3> 4'jj , ::: &'::: :::84<4 ~Ji~ ~ .11
"'~ i 81~....R 4 lili 1;-... 't"'8
. .:~ ~.,. '7 l! II -:--,....... .....'.1 1I .l~: ~ I HAliq.Tb~ 1 2 I ,
-- ,: ~~-~ ~.!\_~, B ~Jl ~ I> 1 ~ ~ M~ ... S 15 L~., ~ J.~.
~~ 3 '\!~ if.i .... 3"l ?,1..l. 'Dn~ E::P- ~ i1 '8'1 '9~ ...
ill ~I../ lJ R 5", .,..... ~... 8 6 7 5-1:01 'alii
I IH7
I ~ 2 I 'I 29 27 ~123 IC 21 '117 131 11 .71 5 3 ','" -- ~
\~;l't1lo-.il I . ~- iI
i..~i ~IC'" i$._S. ieV."..
_ wnr
elr ~Is! Ie' 'II
206 1'0.. 18 el'l,.1 '. '0 8 1\1
518' r9 47 4514,1,,, 13' J7
ii ,.lli' !
I
" ,
528 52" 50148461"14'
i
a
...
, 2
Ill.
I
I, . 5
Nt
, 2 3 .
'0
,'"
6 5 14 ,
18 7 I
9 I I
I , ia I I I
i
T
2
A , 1-= '
. S
, 2 I';
~
8
8 '0 1
e; 1'0 1
a
;;rrrr
. 7
. I
.. , 2 , T 5
"'"
.....
8 '0 1
8 7 · ~Ii=
m I J I'"
II
i II
I I
DAM '
i I n I
2 ~
A 8 , ,-~.- . B
Orfo~~78'
.. ;;-1-- i
~
---r . .
~
:-rl- I
a
m ~..
'~12 , ~ 5
1 rro
Dc,oe'7D
ill"1111I ",.
---.,--
~
lon,
..
II .-
II U I ~~ I!luln i &)u( "11 '1
~nj:;A "'"
I
._ CITY OF CLEARWATER
p~~n.oRlO'
· PllEP....EO BY
...... P\lIWC lIO~ISTIlATlOIl
100 s. Y)rlI. ..... a....... Fl 3.1751
P1l.: ('I27I'II2-4nG, roo: (727)$28-'1BB
...../~.-......,tI\~_1\luDlIt-"'1lI/......1
"_on
PuDtIt ...tonaoUol\ .\0 Ia tumllMd bY' tM Qty 0' Clear"''''
_ ...... _"Iol1o''''~",~ GOd ..... .. .........
GOd u.... ~ ,... ,_, w1\h \lie '.....,_' I.., \lie cIaI.
,.cehed 'MIl calleclId for ..... pwp_ of ~ a 9'OPtdc
Ird'CIIbvct..... 1tl'l8ttor1' As u:t\. the CIty of' a.arwat.. PWA/t.
::::- =~ "'::::-..; ::.'t.~ '::ta for
Oft)' .... potUouIDr u... ,..thln'ftGre. the CIty of Ctaarwot.,.
'WAlE ........ 1'10 IIaItI1t,. ...at..... oaodated wfth the Ult
or mIIu. or IUCh do&o.
lillIIl
.... AU.. _ .. .....JIcII. ...- -..
rro "'ro_ _, _ ,_ ... toI PWA/t ..
.. our WIlt iIt&
a
EB
.
III
o
I
lqo 290 4lIll
SCALE: ," a <100'
6YO
LEGEND:
~ BLOCK NUMBER
1234 LOT ADDRESS
I\)
\0
OJ
)> ----- CITY LIMITS LINE
~
fi23]
SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
OUTSIDE CLEARWA TtR CITY LIMITS
&
AOREEMENT TO ANNEX
.
CITY OWNED PROPERTY
M D R. ZONING DESIGNATION
.
- ZONE LINE
" ..
.......-
mom_
1II_1>>If7/tJ
m ".., ../CIII'
III .....",..,...
lJJ _ ""./tJ
11I_......""..101
"... 0MntCIN
121 .... ../I.....
.
r REVISED:
09/09/2002
ZONING ATLAS
SE 1/4 OF SECTION \2'958
16 - 29 S - 15 E =-=-
.
.
FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
Date Received: 12/26/2002
COURTSTREETCONVENIENCESTORE
ZONING DISTRICT: D
LAND USE: CBD
ATLAS PAGE: 286B
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
Fit
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
June 17, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All uersons wishine to address an item need to be oresent at the BEGINNING of the meetine.
Those cases that are not contested by the aoolicant. staff. neiehborine prooerty owners. etc. will be olaced
on a consent aeenda and aooroved by a smele vote at the bP.Pinnine of the meetine.
1. The Ceocot COIV./Clearwater Deoot. Inc./Porooise Pool & Patio Inc. (Clearwater Train Station, Inc.) are
requesting a flexible development approval to permit an automobile service station in the Downtown District as a
Comprehensive Inf1l1 Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: The
redevelopment of the site with a 3,200 sq ft convenience store with gas pumps) at 657 Court St., Magnolia Park,
Blk 13, Lots 10 & 11 less St & less W 23 ft & S thof alley adj and the East 30 ft of Lot 12 & S thalleyadj less
St. & W 23 ft of Lot 11 less St and Court Square, Blk 13, E 8 inches of Lot 6, Lot 7 and West 30 ft of Lot 8 &
N 1/2vac alley adj on S, Lot 9 & E 20 ft of Lot 8. FLD2002-12045
2. Decade 80 - XIV (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) are requesting a flexible development approval to increase
the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 ft to 138 ft (as measured from base flood elevation), as a
Comprehensive InfIlI Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, and to reduce the buffer
width along the north property line from 10 ft to 5 ft (to fire access drive), as a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: A mixed-use development with 134
attached condominium dwelling, four attached townhome dwellings and a 120-slip marina (62 public slips and 58
slips reserved for condos) at 900 N. Osceola Ave., F.T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10 & Tringlland to W adj to
Lots 9&10; J.A. Gorra's Sub, Blk 2, W 120 ft of Lot 1, Lots 2 & 3, and vac Nicholson St. adj S of Lot 3; E'ly 150 ft
of Lot 1 and Sue Barco Sub, Lot 1,13-14,23, and part of Lot 22. FLD2002-10036
3. Clearwater NeiS!hborhood HousinS! Services. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the
front (south) setback along Nicholson Street from 25 ft to 17.66 ft to house and reduce the front (east) setback from
25 ft to 10 ft to driveway, as part of the Residentiallnfill Project under Section 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: A single-
family dwelling totaling 1,636 sq ft) at 914 Nicholson St.. Pine Crest Sub, Blk 2, Lot 6. FLD2003-04018
4. Nation Land Trust / Lennie Jacobs. TRE is requesting a flexible development approval as a Comprehensive
infill Redevelopment Project to reduce the lot width from 200 ft to 70 ft, reduce the front (west) setback from 25 ft to
15 ft, reduce the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 0.44 ft, reduce the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft, and
reduce the lot size from 40,000 sq ft to 19,250 sq ft (Proposed Use: Vehicle sales and display in association with an
existing auto sales use) at 19246 US 19 N. Sec. 19-29-16, M&B 14.04. FLD2003-04020.
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or fIle written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by
the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings. will need a record of the proceedings and, for
such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for
review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater,
Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
.,
.
Helo Inc
439 Island Way
Clearwater FL 33767 -
fl L 0 "~ - / c2-0fr
All Around Your Home Inc
POBox 413
Clearwater FL 33757 - 0413
Deegan, John F TRE
1'560 Gulf Blvd # 1504
Clearwater FL 33767 -
Cepcot Corp
14480 62nd St N
Clearwater FL 33760 - 2721
Ewart Holdings Inc
POBox 747
Largo FL 33779 - 0747
Times Publishing Co Inc
POBox 1121
St Petersburg FL 33731 - 1121
Osburg, Sybil M Pinellas County Church of Scientology
Osburg, Stephen C Attn:Gen Serv/R E Religious Trust
700 Court St ~15 Court St 319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5508 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423
Church of Scientology Church of Scientology Church of Scientology
Board of Trustees Board of Trustees Board of Trustees
319 S Garden Ave 319 S Garden Ave 319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423
Church of Scientology Church of Scientology Clearwater Depot Inc
Board of Trustees Board of Trustees c/o Pinch A Penny Inc
319 S Garden Ave 319 S Garden Ave POBox 6025
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423 Clearwater FL 33756 - Clearwater FL 33758 - 6025
Clearwater Depot Inc Connelly, John P Connelly, John
POBox 6025 630 Chestnut St 630 Chestnut St
Clearwater FL 33758 - 6025 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5337 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5337
Intervest Bank
625 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5528
Baskin, H H Sr Rental
Properties Inc
703 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5507
Baskin, H H Sr Rental
Properties Inc
703 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5507
Kapetanopoulos, Thanasis
Kapetanopoulos, Dimitrios
1704 Simmons Ct
Dunedin FL 34698 - 5507
Kapetanopoulos, Thanasis
Kapetanopoulos, Dimitrios
1704 Simmons Ct
Dunedin FL 34698 - 5507
Clearwater Village
Minkoff, Sue TRE
423 Cleveland St
Clearwater FL 33755 -
Baskin, H H Sr Rental
Properties Inc
703 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5507
Pinellas County
Attn: Real Estate Mgmt
315 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165
Frontier Properties
504 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5614
Frontier Properties
504 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5614
Pinellas County Pinellas County
Attn: Real Estate Mgmt Attn: Gen Services
315 Court St 315 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165
FILE
" . fjL~ e!)OD.;l -/~tY/...r
Pelican Bay Ltd Inc Pinellas County Pinellas County
639 Chestnut St Attn: Gen Serv Real Est Attn: Real Estate Mgmt
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5336 315 Court St 315 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165
Pinellas County Pinellas County Church of Scientology
Attn: Gen Services Attn Real Estate Mgmt Div Board of Trustees
315 Court St 315 Court St 319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165 Clearwater FL 33756 -
Clearwater, City of Clearwater, City of Church of Scientology
P o Box 4748 POBox 4748 Religious Trust
Clearwater FL 33758 - 4748 Clearwater FL 33758 - 4748 319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423
Church of Scientology Church of Scientology Church of Scientology
Board of Trustees Board of Trustees Board of Trustees
319 S Garden Ave 319 S Garden Ave 319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423
Pinellas County Krug, Dell Jiffy Reprographics Inc
315 Court St 4738 Pebble Brook Dr 411 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5165 Oldsmar FL 34677 - 4848 Clearwater FL 33756 - 5511
Kerr, Ann L
2817 W Hawthorne Rd
Tampa FL 33611 - 2827
Roperti, Robert J
411 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5511
Jiffy Reprographics Inc
411 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5511
Church Of Scientology
Board Of Trustees
319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 -
Church of Scientology
Board of Trustees
319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423
Church of Scientology
Board of Trustees
118 N Fort Harrison Ave
Clearwater FL 33755 - 4019
Church of Scientology
Religious Trust
319 S Garden Ave
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5423
Intervest Bank
625 Court St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5528
Cepcot Corp
POBox 6025
Clearwater FL 33758 - 6025
Porpoise Pool & Patio Inc
POBox 6025
Clearwater FL 33758 - 6025
Clearwater, City of
POBox 4748
Clearwater FL 33758 - 4748
Jordan, Esther F
611 14th Ave NW
Largo FL 33770 - 1111
Wallace, William D TRE
Wallace, Frances L TRE
606 Turner St
ClearwaterFL 33756 - 5315
Wallace, William D TRE
Wallace, John L
606 Turner St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5315
Pontrello, William G
619 Chestnut St
Clearwater FL 33756 - 5336
"i~-
Wallace, William D TRE
"r allace, John L TRE
606 Turner St
ClearwaterFL 33756 - 5315
e1
Randy Wedding
300 1st Ave S Suite 402
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
r LI.Jc:';LeJt:>cJ - /c:/e>Y-J-
Pierce 100 Condominium Assoc.
Terry Turner
100 Pierce St. #710
Clearwater, FL 33756
e
ei
FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
Date Received:
COURT STREET CONVENIENCE STORE
ZONING DISTRICT: D
LAND USE: CBD
ATLAS PAGE: 286B
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
FLD2002-12045
657 COURT ST
Date Received: 12/26/2002
COURT STREET CONVENIENCE STORE .
ZONING DISTRICT: D
LAND USE: CBD
ATLAS PAGE: 286B
CLWCoverSheet
l~/lY;~UU~ IHU 11:45 FAX
c.~'~
.
.
I4J 0011003
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
RE:
SUBJ:
DATE:
JOliN BRENDLA,P.E.
C.RANDOLPH WEDDING FAIA/ASLA
COURT STREET PROPERTY -CLEARWATER
DELIVERY OF SURVEYS
12/19/02
DEAR JOHN-
AS WE DISCUSSED, WE I NEED TO HAVE YOUR FOLKS DELIVER TWELYE SIGNED AND
SEALE)) copms OF THE SURVEY TO:
M:R. WAYNE WELLS, AICP
SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF CLEARWATER
CLEARWATER MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE
SECOND FLOOR
CLEARW A TER, FL.
THESE COPIES MUST BE IN HIS HANDS BEFORE NOON ON DECBMBER 26 OR WE WILL
HA VB MISSED TUE FILING DEADLINE.
NORMALLY, TillS WOULD NOT BE A DISASTER, BUT THIS REQUEST IS A HIGHLY +
HOTLY CONTESTED CASE, AND THE STAFF IS LOOKING FOR ANY EXCUSE TO THROW IT
OUT OR DELAY IT A MONTI!.
TillS CLIENT HAS NO SENSE OF HUMOR.
ENCLOSED IS A COpy OF MY LEITER TO WELLS wafCH ADVISES HIM OF YOUR
DELIVERY AT A LATER TIME THAN TODAY.
I APPRECIATE YOUR ATIENTION TO THIS MAITER AND HOPE YOU HAVE A MERRY
CHRISTMAS.
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibargiien
~: Architects} Inc.
PROP. lUte. ~M . 0002922
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402 · St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(813) 821-6610 1-800-656-6610 FAX: (813) 894-4216
// \~)
,\V \ ,Cl
\1',.. .;( / ~ ') V /
, ')/ \::J i-,I \"1
~\'i ~t1 f
~
I
.
.
WEST COAST DESIGN, INC.
10681 Gulf Blvd., Suite 205
Treasure Island, FL 33706
Phone (727) 368-0491
Fax (727) 368-0589
DRAINAGE CALCULATION INDEX AND CERTIFICATION
CONVENIENCE STORE
657 COURT ST.
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
SECTION 15-29S-15E
PINELLAS COUNTY
PROJECT No. 03-004
DESCRIPTION
Calculation Index and Certification
Rational Method Drainage Calculations
Stage-Storage for Retention Pond
PAGE
1
2
3
. I" .
C J
MAY 0 2 2003
OBSOLETE
MEMBER ST. PETERSBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Date
"
.
.
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - RATIONAL METHOD
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNER
DATE
657 COURT STREET
03-004
DCL
JAN. 29, '03
o 2-YEAR
o 3-YEAR
o 5-YEAR
o 10-YEAR
1 25- YEAR
o 50-YEAR
TIME OF CONCENTRATION
HIGH EL.=
LOW EL. =
DISTANCE=
26.9
24.5
320
T.O.C.................... 9.0 min.
IF LESS THAN 10 MIN, USE 10
INTENSiTY................ 8.46 inlhr
EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
OTHER C= 0.20
TOTAL
C= 0.81
AC.
0.8232
0.1289
0.0000
0.9521
PROPOSED
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
POND
OTHER C 0.90
TOTAL
C*A=
C=
AC.
0.6297
0.2591
0.0633
0.0000
0.9521
EXISTING RUN-OFF COEF.
INTENSITY
SITE AREA / AC.
0.81
8.46 DISCHARGE {Q} =
0.9521
6.49
1ST-112" 0.9521 1ST-3/4" 0.0000 1 ST-1 " 0.0000
DURATION INTENSITY INFLOW DISCHARGE REQ.STOR
MIN. IN/HR CU.FT. CU.FT. CU.FT.
10 8.46 3462 3892 0
15 7.25 4450 5837 0
20 6.44 5266 7783 0
30 5.35 6571 11675 0
40 4.64 7592 15566 0
50 4.12 8425 19458 0
60 3.72 9122 23349 0
75 3.25 9983 29187 0
90 2.90 10681 35024 0
105 2.62 11260 40861 0
120 2.39 11750 46699 0
135 2.20 12171 52536 0
150 2.04 12539 58373 0
SUMMARY
REQUIRED ATTENUATION VOLUME 0 CUFT
REQUIRED DER RETENTION VOLUME 1728 CUFT
TOTAL REQUIRED VOLUME 1728 CUFT
OBSOLETE
"
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCl
DATE 4/1512003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
REA @ T.O.B. 1755 El.... ......... 25.00
REA @ DHW 1467 El.......... 24.50
REA @ DlW 1467 El.......... . 24.50
REA BOTT.\NWl 601 El.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT
23.00 601 0 24.02 1189 913
23.04 624 24 24.06 1212 960
23.08 646 49 24.10 1235 1008
23.12 669 75 24.14 1257 1057
23.16 692 101 24.18 1280 1106
23.20 714 129 24.22 1302 1157
23.24 737 157 24.25 1325 1209
23.27 759 187 24.29 1348 1261
23.31 782 217 24.33 1370 1314
23.35 805 248 24.37 1393 1368
23.39 827 280 24.41 1416 1423
23.43 850 313 24.45 1438 1479
23.47 873 347 24.49 1461 1536
23.51 895 381 24.53 1483 1594
23.55 918 417 24.57 1506 1653
23.59 940 453 24.61 1529 1712
23.63 963 491 24.65 1551 1773
23.67 986 529 24.69 1574 1834
23.71 1008 568 24.73 1597 1896
23.75 1031 608 24.76 1619 1959
23.78 1054 649 24.80 1642 2023
23.82 1076 691 24.84 1664 2088
23.86 1099 733 24.88 1687 2154
23.90 1121 777 24.92 1710 2220
23.94 1144 821 24.96 1732 2288
23.98 1167 867 25.00 1755 2356
!!~lii.;m;;;""m;,;m;:'~~~i!ljlllllllillllliil~lli~illIi
.eRReT:EN .VOIli.. ..........................1S5l1.....G.U~f:T:L...
~~~~II~liliMEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111~1~11111~~~~11I11
OBSOLETE
.
..
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: n7-562-4567
Fax: n7-562-4865
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
APR 1 ~ 2003
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPM,(NN'iIIOJIPA.RTMENt
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (R~,..tyl00s1O~RWATER
,.., PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT,.., use additional sheets as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: THE CEPCOT CORPORATION
MAILING AOORESS: 14480 62nd STREET NORTH. CLEARWATER, FL l'H60
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ieisch@cepcot.us
PHONE NUMBER: 727-531-8913.
FAX NUMBER: 727-'i36-8066
CELL NUMBER:
813-205-5300
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
THE CEPCOT CORPORATTON' r.T.F.ARTJATF.R TRATN ~TATTON, TNr. (f!k/~
(Must include AlL owners)
CLEARWATER DEPOT. INC.)
AGENT NAME(S): RANDY WEDDING
MAILING ADDRESS: 300 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH. fiUITE_.402., ST. PETERSBURG. "FL 33701
E-MAIL ADDRESS: randy/ilw~ddingarl'hi f"Pl'f"R t'nm
PHONE NUMBER: 727-821-6610
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
727-894-4216
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREETADDRESSofsubjectsite: 657 COURT STRF.ET, r.T.F.ARTJATER, FT. 1':n~R
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A"
(If not listed here, please note \he location of this document in the submittal)
16/29/2'i/18648/011/0070;1~/?q/l~/~aa~O/011/0100jl~!?9!1~/~a450!Ol~!Ol?O
0.95A; 41~ 341 SQ. FT.
PARCEL NUMBERS:
PARCEL SIZE:
(acres. square feet)
PROPOSEDUSEANDSIZE: CONVENIENCE STORE (3200 SQ. FT.) AND FUEL DISPENSARY
(number of dwelling units. hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR RETRO FIT FIT OF EXISTING SITE
- -
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
oEl~(:jt!Ti:ment Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project-City of Clearwater
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TM. ER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVl.>L Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documenG) ,
c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
III SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY. DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6) COPIES OF DEEDS ATTACHED.
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
II Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land win be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
The surrounding commercial warehouse, light industrial, office and utility substation uses are all compatible with the
proposed development. . The height and bulk of the proposal are less than any of the adjacent uses.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
. Our appraiser has told us that the use proposed is the highest and best use for this specific tract Keep in mind that
. there is an existing railroad track to the east of the site and that this facility will sit across from a ware~ouse to the east.
What is proposed will represent an upgrade to the properties both to the east and south. No harm will be done to the
. properties to the west or north.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
There is no immediate reskiential use adjacent to the site. Indeed no residential properties abut or are across from this site. The Pinellas Trail to
the east will be buffered along at least 80% percent of its length along East Street and thus not adversely affected by the proposal. Entry to the site
will be from the north and the south from Court Street and Chestnut Street, both being one-way thoroughfares.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Court Street adjoins the site to the north and is one-way to the west. Chestnut Street which adjoins the site to the
- south is one-way east. Thus the North and South ingress and egress creates no turning problems in connection with
_ the flow of traffic. Delivery vehicles will be able to pass through the site without backing up into or blocking either
Chestnut or Court Streets.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
The site presently is bounded by a railroad/light industrial area to the east. There is a utility substation under
ons~ructiontothenorth:and there are commercial properties, banks, OffIce buildings and the like, to the south and
'west. What is propc)seahere is completely consistent with the surrounding environment.
..,- --".
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effecG, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacG,
on adjacent properties.
The design proposed will improve the site visually and there will be adequate buffering from properties to the west
Since no residential properties face the site or exist in the immediate vicinity there is no adverse impact on residentia;
uses.
'-
Q Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
,:/0 variances other than the use itself are being requested in connection with this application. The project's low F.AR
IS well below the intensity standards set forth in the Clearwater City Codes.
o Bsbt~~velopment Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive intill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
Again, our appraisal indicates that the proposed use is the highest and best for this site. If that be true then the
development will increase and not adversely impact the property values of surrounding sites.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The uses proposed here are permitted in the City of Clearwater and they are not prohibited within the downtown
district zone.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive intill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
Surrounding properties (warehouse and railroad tract to' the east, light manufacturing to the south, utility building to
the north and offices to the west with no residential immediately adjacent) dictates that the proposal is compatible with
its surroundings.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive intill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
The suitability of the site is its availability to the traveling public. Court Street being one-way to the west and Chestnut
Street being one-way to the east (both streets abut this site) makes it particularly suitable for the public convenience.
There are no other known such sites between Chestnut and Court streets.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive intill redevelopment project will upgrade the inmediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development
The excessive landscaping and the use of Mediterranean architectural style are intended to create a visually pleasant
and compatible environment and will upgrade the immediate vicinity.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive intill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Care has been taken to use a style of architecture with strong reference to traditional historical character of downtown
Clearwater. That design effort creates a form and ambiance that enhances the community character of the site.
8. Aexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
No lot width, setback, height and off-street parking variances have been requested, thus no justification is called for.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development
All code required parking will be contained on-site and there will be no on-street parking resulting from the
development of the site. Loading/unloading will be accomplished entirely within the site.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
The project is speciflC8l1y designed to meet the design guidelines of the Downtown District and with this design we
believe we have accomplished that purpose.
o SSQ LETE ""'- Appli.a!;on - Com",...,.,... l.fllI_elopm'" -- City of CleanNal..
E. 'SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL .UIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A>.
Cl SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
Q TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4- or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
Q[ lOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; SEE COVER SHEET.
Q PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
Q GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
Q PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued unbl evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
Q COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
III
.1L
.1L
.1L
.1L
..x...
..x...
-X...
~
.1L
.1L
BJ..A
...x..
-x-
-x-
.1L
..L
..L
.1L
...x..
...x..
..X-.
..X-.
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24- x 36j:
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
AD required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
location of all public and private easements;
location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer JInes, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of an required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (0)(1) and Index #701}; .
location of all landscape material; SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET.
location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
location of an onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
location of an existing and proposed sidewalks
iI SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form:
ili
..lL
.1L
.1L
x
..1L
..1L
.1L
.1L
.L
land area in squall! feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved a~a. including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area.
Size and species of all landscape material; ,
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F .AR.) for all nonresidential uses
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible
Q' FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
NlA One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
>- Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
f- All open space areas;
I-- location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms:
>- Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
>- Streets and drives (dimensioned);
I-- Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
I-- Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a -certified arborist-, of all trees 8- DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
o BS'i::)[~Velopment Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
G.LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section"4-1102.A)
ai
-A.
-A.
~
x
-A.
..x..
z(h
..x...
.1L
.1L
l@
all
B/A
filA
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles; . .
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey); "
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered; .
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ...
Irrigation notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible)
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM apprlC8tion, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
IX STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area Including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
~ COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY lETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval Is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
[] COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) .
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
/I BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
llll REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required SEE RENDERING INCLUDED WITH APPLICATION.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19, SIGNS I Section 3-1806) SEPARATE APPLICATION WILL BE FILED LATER.:-
[] All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
a All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
[] Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
[] Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
OBSOLETE
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Indude as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Enginee(s Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
SWom to and subscribed before me this _ day of
A.D. 20 to me and/or by
. who is personally known has
produced as
identification.
Signature of property owner or representative James P. Eis ch
Notary public,
My commission expires:
Page 6 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
OBSOLETE
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
The Cepcot Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I amJwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
657 Court Street (Clearwater Train Station Restaurant)
651 Court Street (UPARC Thrist Store)
640-642 Chestnut Street (Freedom Park)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect -
City of Clearwater
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint: c. Randolph1\Wedding/Ed Armstrong. Ewquire
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to exearte any petitions or other doaJments necessary to affed such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Rorida to consider and ad on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impad fees (parks and recreation, traffic, ete.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this appHcation and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and corred.
Property ONner James P. Eisch, COO
Property o.vner . .
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Rorida, on this .1. -;; ..~: ~~l day of
, personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that helshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
S:lPlanning DepartmenMpplication Forms\deve/opment review\2002 Forms\comprehensive intill appUcation 2OO2.doc
LETE
Page 7 of 7 - Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projed- City of Clearwater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
The Cepcot Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
(Names of an property owners)
1. . That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
657 Court Street (Clearwater Train Station Restaurant)
651 Court Street (UPARC Thrift Store)
640-642 Chestnut Street (Freedom Park)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Flexible Development Application - CnmpTP-hp-nRivp. Tnfill Rp~p.vp.lnpmp.n~ PTnjp~~
City of Clearwater
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint C. R~n~nlph TJp~~ing!F.~ AT'1IIR~rnng, F.Rqnirp
as (hisJtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the CIty of Clearwater, Florida to consider and ad on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impad fees (parks and reaeation, traffic, ete.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by CIty representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (1Iwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foreg .
STATE
COUNTY OF P1NBJ.AS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned ~ the laws of.Jhe~tate of F}orida, on this. 11"" day of
D Pi! '.JH bv. ' PlCO')... personally appeared ~( ~t:.1 S l ~ " who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that helshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit that helshe signed. t1 W ", ~ .I
My Commission Expires: ArE":or:~ Karen S. McLeod :;;:k;.~ .Ll:i. ~
:*: :~ MYCOMMISSIOH,CC855415 EXPIfS 1-7 . NotaryPubRc
~ .=;ff Auaust 7, 2003
".f''''j..,~'~ 80H0mTHRUTRoYFAIN INC
S:\Rannlng Deparlment\AppflCation Forms\development teView\2002 Forms\comprehensive InflU application 2002.doc
OBSOLETE
.;.
Page 7 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project-City of Clearwater
.
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Enginee(s Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in .this applica~on.
STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PINELLAS J"ld
~ and subsaibed before me this ~ day of
~f't.~D. 20~ to me and/or by
p. 1 . who IS personallv known has
produced r as
icIentification.
~ 1.. /J(tftJ
My commission expires:
";e; .
!.: i*\ MY COMMISSION' CC85S415 EXPIRES
~,' AuaUlt 7, 2003
v~ . IONOID TMlUlIoY FAIle IN9IlRAHEf. INC
'"
SOLETE
.;. Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR
APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL 0
Parcel No. 15/29/15/54450/013/0100
All of lot 10 and the East 27 feet of lot 11. Block 13,
MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded In Plat Book 3. Page
43. pubrlC Records of Plnellas County, Florida. LESS
right-of-way for Chestnut Street. together with that
part of the South % of the alley abutting Lot 10 and
the East 27 feet of Lot 11.
Parcel No. 15/29/15/54450101310120
The West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30 feet of Lot
12, Block 13, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded In Plat
Book 3. Page 43, Pubfic Records of Pinellas County,
Florida. LESS right-of-way for Chestnut Street.
together with that part of the South 0% of the alley
abutting the West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30
feet of Lot 12.
Parcel No. 15/29/15/18848/013/0070
The East 8 inchet~ of Lot 6, all of Lot 7 and the West
30 feet of Lot 8. Block 13, COURT SQUARE. as
recorded In Plat Book 5, Page 53, Public Records of
Pinellas County. Florida. together with the North * of
the alley abutting the East 8 inches of Lot 6. all of Lot
7 and the West ~O feet of Lot 8. situate and lying in
Pinellas County. f'lorida.
Parcel No. 16/291"15/186481013/0090
Lot 9 and the East 20 feet of Lot 8, Block 13.
MAGNOLIA PARK. as recorded in Plat Book 3. Page
43, of the Public Records of Plnellas County. Florida.
#284902 v1 - CepeotlLegal Descriptk'll
o S LETE
EXHIBIT A
.
.
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Cleaiwater, FL 33758-4748
Re: Application for Flexible Development approval (Case FLD2002-1-2045)
to permit an automobile service station in the Downtown District as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-903.C, at 65TCourt Street.
RECEIVED
MAY 0 2 2003
PLANN'NG DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
April 30, 2003
Dear Mr. Wells:
Enclosed you will find revised site elevations and other drawings made in
response to the items you set out in your April 29th letter to this office. These
should pave the way for a full, frank and candid discussion at the scheduled May
15th meeting with you and others of the City's Planning Staff. Ed Armstrong will
cover your item #9, the existing train station.
We look forward to that meeting and to getting this matter to the Community
Development Board on June 17, 2003.
YZIry buly,
WiUJ:. F. Davenport,
p
Enclosures
cc: Jim Eisch
Ed Armstrong, Attorney
OBSOLETE
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibargiien
Architects, Inc.
PROF. REG. #AA - 0002922
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402' St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(727) 821-6610 FAX: (727) 894-4216
~2.4.72'
A.F.F.
~ 20.50'
A.F.F.
~ 16.33'
A.F.F.
~ 11.B3'
A.F.F.
1/
~O.O'
F.F.
TILE ROOF (TERRACOTTA)
RAISEO STUCCO BANO - TY~,
(TWO SHAOES OARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
STUCCO
(BUFF YELLOW)
ILLUMINATEO
SIGN BY OTHERS
I'
FOREST GREEN ALUMINUM FRAME - TYP.
6.4'-0.
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
SEE NOTE BELOW
SCALE: N,T.S.
WEST ELEVATION
NOTE:
RAISED STUCCO BAND TO BE
TWO (2) SHADES DARKER THAN
GENERAL WALL COLOR, BUFF YELLOW
Wedding
'Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
# M 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
COURT STREET CONY. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W02111
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
REVISED ELEVATION COLOR NOTES
SCALE: N. T. S.
@ 2003 WEDDING. STEPHENSON 4< lBARGUEN ARCHlTECI'S. INC.
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
(TWO SHADES DARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
-0
~~
O~
."Z
(')G>
,0
~~
~~
~3:
mm
'3;:
~
e-
N
;0
m
()
m
<:
m
CJ
"-'
=
=
C-U
~24.72'
A.F,F.
~ 20.50'
A,F.F,
TILE ROOF (TERRACOTTA)
~O.O'
F.FO
to
(f)
o
r-
m
-I
m
Wedding
~ Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
# AA 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
~ 16.33'
A.F.F.
~ 11.B3'
A.F.F.
ILLUMINATED
SIGN BY OTHERS
l'
FOREST GREEN ALUMINUM FRAME - TYP.
64'-0.
SCALE: N.T,S.
EAST ELEVATION
NOTE:
RAISED STUCCO BAND TO BE
TWO (2) SHADES DARKER THAN
GENERAL WALL COLOR, BUFF YELLOW
COURT STREET CONY. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W02111
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
REVISED ELEVATION COLOR NOTES
SCALE: N. T.S.
@ '}f)()J WEDDING. srEPHENSON & IBARGUEN ARCHITECTS. INC.
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
(TWO SHADES DARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
STUCCO
(BUFF YELLOW)
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
(TWO SHADES DARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
oiJ ::0
-~
~Z m
O~ :s.:
"Z ~ ()
O(j) c m
.0
~~ N -
"-' <
~::o =
= m
~g (J.:J
::0
~ 25.33'
A.F.F.
~ 20.B3'
A.F.F.
~ 16.33'
A.F.F.
~ 11.B3'
A.F.F.
~O.O'
o F.F.
m
en
TILE ROOF (TERRACOTTA)
~ STUCCO
(BUFF YELLOW) \
~c
r-
rn
--f
m
Wedding
~ Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
# AA 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
(TWO SHADES DARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
50'-0.
~I
NORTH ELEVATION
NOTE:
RAISED STUCCO BAND TO BE
TWO (2) SHADES DARKER THAN
BACK GROUND COLOR.
SCALE: N.T.S.
COURT STREET CONY. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W02Ill
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
REVISED ELEVATION COLOR NOTES
SCALE: N. T.S.
@ 2003 WEDDING. STEPHENSON & lBARGUEN ARCHITECTS. INC.
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
(TWO SHADES DARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
FOREST GREEN
ALUMINUM FRAME - TYP.
(")"'0
-~
::<Z
O~
."Z
(")G>
r-e
~~
~~
~3:
mm
::oZ
-f
:s::
)>
-<
;:0
m
()
m
-
<
m
o
C
l\..:
r-..:
=
=
c:.....:
~ 25.33'
A.F.F.
~ 20.B3'
A.F.F.
~ 16.33'
A.F.F.
~ 11.B3'
A.F.F.
FOREST GREEN
ALUMINUM FRAME - TYP.
~O.O'
F.F.
o
Ie
(IJ
Wedding
~ Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc,
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
# AA 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
(TWO SHADES DARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
50'-0.
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: N.T.s.
TILE ROOF (TERRACOTTA)
'- STUCCO
(BUFF YELLOW) \
~I
NOTE:
RAISED STUCCO BAND TO BE
TWO (2) SHADES DARKER THAN
BACK GROUND COLOR.
COURT STREET CONY. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W02111
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
REVISED ELEVATION COLOR NOTES
SCALE: N. T.S.
@ 2Q03 WEDDING, STEPHENSON & IBARGUEN ARCHITECTS, INC.
RAISED STUCCO BAND - TYP.
(TWO SHADES DARKER THAN
THE GENERAL WALL COLOR
BUFF YELLOW)
()"O
-~
~Z
O~
-nZ
()G'>
.-0
~~
~~
~i!
mm
::oz
~
s
~
C
(\.;
:::0
m
()
m
-
<
m
c
.......,
=
=
~
.
RECEIVED
MAY U G 2003
14'-B"
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LEARWATER
-
.
en
I
.
0
...
-f-' -
. I
. x I
enot
'l 2: I
. _ --.-J
I
I
. I
o .
I Z I
....
:.or 2: I
I
12'-0"
CLEARANCE MIN.
r- ---q----------o-----i
I L 6" DIA. STEEL BOLLARDS :
1 CONC. FILLED (TYP.) ~ -
I I
pen
I ~ ~l"': I
1 en :::'t I
I u UJ'" I
15 ~ffi I-
I u ufa. I
1 ~ 1
I I
I I _
o .
STUCCO FINISH EXTERIOR
BLOCK FINISH INTERIOR
PAINTED BUFF YELLOW
TO MATCH BUILDING FINISH
J
DROP PIN
HOLE (TYP.)
J
o
PLAN VIEW
OBSOLETE
Wedding
~ Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc,
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
#M 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
COURT STREET CONY. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W021II
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN
SCALE: N, T.S.
'C' 2003 NEDDIN9. STEPHENSON I IBAR6UEN
\l::I ARCHITECTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!l
I
I
I I
I I
__-==-L===== I
1\ \ I
I \ \ I I
I \ \ I \MAY 0 ~ iUllj
I \ \ I
I \ \ I I
I \ \ I oLAN~ING DEPARTMENT
\ \ I CITY OF CLEARWATEh
\ \ I I
\ \ I r--- ---T-------
I
-.t. 1/-, I
1\ If C) \ m
II II I
II II I
II II I I
I II II 0 I I
t, I II II I I
\1 1111 C' I I
i \ I i 'V II C' I 1
\1 ~ 1\ C' J I
I) 111"'_/ $
I 1\ I II 1', I
i I II I ,
\ II I , I I
.''<11 \ I I
" I \ IfI I
-' ...I
, ,
\ ,
\ \
, \
\ \
\ \
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
/ I
/ I
t./ I
/
./
./
./
,..
,..
- I
/
/
,..
// /
// /
-- ./
-- ./
[r=~ --~--~=~I[JI/~/'
------------------------------------------------
o
SOLETE
ONEWA Y c:>
CHESTNUT STREET
(60' R/W)
41.10' ASPHALT - "F" CURB
8
'--J
Wedding
~ Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
# AA 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
COURT STREET CONV. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W02IIl
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
REVISED FUEL TRUCK CIRC. PLAN
SCALE: N. T.S.
'C' 2003 WEDDINS. STEPtENSON & IBAR6UEN
~ ARCHITECTS. INC.
RECEIVED
MAY 02 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
SITE OAT A:
ZONED DISTRICT: 0 (DOWNTOWN)
EXISTING USE: RETAIL SALES AND SERVICE
PROPOSED USE: AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION
SITE AREA: 41,473 S.F. OR 0.95 ACRES
SETBACKS: FRONT .. N/A
SIDE .. N/A
REAR .. N/A
GROSS FLOOR AREA:
BUILDING COVERAGE:
OPEN GREEN SPACE:
INT. GREEN SPACE
OF VEHICULAR AREA:
PAVING COVERAGE:
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:
EXISTING
B,723 S.F.
B,723 S.F. OR 21.01
5,614 S.F. OR 13.61
N/A
27,136 S.F. OR 65.41
35,B59 S.F. OR B6.41
PROPOSED
3,200 S.F.
3,200 S.F. OR 07.71 '/
12,778 S.F. OR 30.BI . lo.Lf(, {-o
2,667 S.F. OR 06.41/ Y,VINV
25,495 S.F. OR 61.51 ,Ft fl
2B.695 S.F. OR 69.21
F.A.R.: 3,200 / 41,473 .. .077
I.S.R.: 2B,695 / 41,473 .. .692
PARKING: REOUIREO: 5 PER 1,000 GFA (3,200) .. 16 SPACES
PROPOSEO: 15 SPACES + 1 H.C. .. 16 SPACES
BUILDING HEIGHT: 30'-50' MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT
21.92' FUEL PUMPING STATION II
23.16' FUEL PUMPING STATION 12
20.B3' CONVENIENCE STORE
OBSOLETE
Wedding
~ Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
(727) 821-6610 (727) 8944216 Fax
Professional Registration
8M 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
COURT STREET CONY. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W02Ill
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
REVISED SITE DATA/INT. GREEN AREA
SCALE: N. T.S.
@ 2003 WEDDING. STEPtENSON II IBARGUEN
ARCHITECTS, INC.
1.508 S.F.
1,009 S.F.
150 S.F.
2,667 S.F.
TOTAL INTERIOR GREEN SPACE
OF VEHICULAR AREA
OBSOLETE
Wedding
~ Wedding, Stephenson, &
Ibarguen Architects, Inc.
(727) 821-6610 (727) 894-4216 Fax
Professional Registration
#M 0002922 www.weddingarchitects.com
1.508 S.F.
/
/
/
/
/
1.009 S.F.
C8J
COURT STREET CONY. STORE
PROJECT NUMBER: W02Ill
DATE: APRIL 30, 2003
INT. GREEN OF VEHICULAR AREA
SCALE: N. T.S.
If' 2003 WEDDING. STEPHENSON & IBARSUEN
~ ARCHITECTS, INC.
ECEIVED
MAY U ~ 2003
NNING OEPARTMEN
, OF CLEARWATER
,
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
, 1
.
.
WEST COAST DESIGN, INC.
10681 Gulf Blvd., Suite 205
Treasure Island, FL 33706
Phone (727) 368-0491
Fax (727) 368-0589
DRAINAGE CALCULATION INDEX AND CERTIFICATION
CONVENIENCE STORE
657 COURT ST.
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
SECTION 15-29S-15E
PINELLAS COUNlY
PROJECT No. 03-004
DESCRIPTION
PAGE
Calculation Index and Certification
Rational Method Drainage Calculations
Stage-Storage for Retention Pond
1
2
3
r~-'~\.. ff; r:n~'-I"~f11 IV7' IS I nl
~.' 1 ...'; \ -r:. ~,; \ t c~ I, I
"---'-'- -~ ..------.......,: I
'. I)l~: MAY 0 2 2003 Ii! i 'I.
I .1, \Lj:
.____,_..___.~_..".~~....,~ ....., i
. t.. '. ,.;: C'lf>;\'. ",' 'I
' .~ l" ",_ ~ .~L' .-_." _\.........,J
,___....:...i2.0F!.U {..r-.'.:\1 r " ....__.'
s
LETE
~~ 4h~,~
mes E. Shirk, P.E. Date
FI. Reg. No. 46468
MEMBER ST. PETERSBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
. ,
.
.
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - RATIONAL METHOD
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNER
DATE
657 COURT STREET
03-004
DCL
JAN. 29, '03
o 2-YEAR
o 3- YEAR
o 5- YEAR
o 10-YEAR
1 25- YEAR
o 50-YEAR
TIME OF CONCENTRATION
ill 1'111'111111111111111111"11,1111'1,1111111'111111111 IIIIIII'IIIIII'I'IIIIIII'L'I'IIIIII'lrl~III'IIIII'lhlll111[11111/111'i'IIIII'II'III"I"IIII"I, I 'I III
Ill! 11'1,1111 ill Ill) )11 III H 11 hi!! elllP j' I ',fi I ' I I
HIGH EL.=
LOW EL. =
DISTANCE=
26.9
24.5
320
RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS
PROPOSED
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
POND
OTHER C
TOTAL
C*A= 0.68
C= 0.72
_IOO__~I
EXISTING RUN-OFF COEF. 0.81
INTENSITY 8.46
SITE AREA / AC. 0.9521
__._.OO._III~~~~J._I~.III~I_
DER TREATMENT VOLUME 17-25
__OO~_III~~
0.0000 1 ST-1 " 0.0000
I III
DURATION INTENSITY INFLOW DISCHARGE REQ.STOR
MIN. IN/HR CU.FT. CU.FT. CU.FT.
_~___I~_III.-
10 8.46 3462 3892 0
15 7.25 4450 5837 0
20 6.44 5266 7783 0
30 5.35 6571 11675 0
40 4.64 7592 15566 0
50 4.12 8425 19458 0
60 3.72 9122 23349 0
75 3.25 9983 29187 0
90 2.90 10681 35024 0
105 2.62 11260 40861 0
120 2.39 11750 46699 0
135 2.20 12171 52536 0
150 2.04 12539 58373 0
I" 1,1,'[1111; 111111,11 Y 1II'I;Jill k"l ;mlu,PIIiIIII,~IIII'III' 1IIIIi'IIIIIIIII1PlIII ~11111,',',II,h II I" 11111I
I II II" llh,E Ii!" ,I mllHill'ill! I 1 I> I H "lll I )
AC.
0.6297
0.2591
0.0633
0.0000
0.9521
EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
OTHER C=
TOTAL
C=
AC.
0.8232
0.1289
0.0000
0.9521
0.90
0.20
0.81
DISCHARGE {Q} =
6.49
1ST-1/2"
0.9521 1ST-3/4"
1'1'11, f,~~llil;p,lul '111'1111,':II~IIWI:I~'lilll:I!I~II:I,II::';:illll :llfil\llilmllll~llilll~!I;llillllllll' 11I11 '11111~1~II'I!!I,! 1!:I'r: Il:III!I:I!,II;IIIIIIII, lillll:l~jJIIIIIIII!I,::I) 1IIIIillllll I!III,II:II:IIIIIWI ill 1'1 11111 : 1~II!WII!!I!!:IIIi,111 III I!il: II'!:II:III"II~~I:I!: i'1111!j~I' /1111;111
SUMMARY
REQUIRED ATTENUATION VOLUME
REQUIRED DER RETENTION VOLUME
TOTAL REQUIRED VOLUME
o
1728
CU FT
CUFT
CUFT
I'll I 11l"i; I'ull jllillillll '11,'II~lllli[' ,ull filii' I, I' 'iI,lritlIIIIIIIUII,I',1III'llilUI;,II,rll,,l11'1l1J "1111'1' 'II '.lmi'II[ilIIII'IIII'IiiII'll0illullll,1I11111 I:' 1[111.I'1:IIIIIII'li I Iii I ',J'I'i'1111 'III I Illk 1:11 "I 1111 "111'1'11111 111I111I1!iIIlH'1 liu,'IIIIIIIIUII'III,'1 111ii11"llllll
I H H ~hWII;mtij 1 !I ,WI! '!jjll II I;" III;I!! ,Ii! III jl II I Iii I II 'I' Wi '~!WP', iflAil; hi 1I11 11 I II \111 ~ 11"1/ I! III I. I \1111 ~, II HI j1111 ill <Ill jjj \ D'dhlilh
1728
BSOLETE
.'
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCl
DATE 4/15/2003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
REA @ T.O.B. 1755 EL............. 25.00
REA @ DHW 1467 EL.......... 24.50
REA @ DlW 1467 EL......... .. 24.50
REA BOTT.\NWl 601 EL.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT
23.00 601 0 24.02 1189 913
23.04 624 24 24.06 1212 960
23.08 646 49 24.10 1235 1008
23.12 669 75 24.14 1257 1057
23.16 692 101 24.18 1280 1106
23.20 714 129 24.22 1302 1157
23.24 737 157 24.25 1325 1209
23.27 759 187 24.29 1348 1261
23.31 782 217 24.33 1370 1314
23.35 805 248 24.37 1393 1368
23.39 827 280 24.41 1416 1423
23.43 850 313 24.45 1438 1479
23.47 873 347 24.49 1461 1536
23.51 895 381 24.53 1483 1594
23.55 918 417 24.57 1506 1653
23.59 940 453 24.61 1529 1712
23.63 963 491 24.65 1551 1773
23.67 986 529 24.69 1574 1834
23.71 1008 568 24.73 1597 1896
23.75 1031 608 24.76 1619 1959
23.78 1054 649 24.80 1642 2023
23.82 1076 691 24.84 1664 2088
23.86 1099 733 24.88 1687 2154
23.90 1121 777 24.92 1710 2220
23.94 1144 821 24.96 1732 2288
23.98 1167 867 25.00 1755 2356
::::::::::::~:::::m::~:::::::::H:::::::::H:H::SUMMARY:::::::H:::::::::::::::H:::::::::::n:::H:~::::::
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
~1_lqli_~!I!!!!!!!I'!!I!!!iiii!!H'~Rllillr!llil!
tOTAtj!V.OOUME:::::~::~:!:::::::::!:!!!:::::::::::::::!::::!!!~:::1S51::::!C.U~Fln:::::
OBSOLETE
w
li.i
...I
o
en
m
o
.
.
m Wedding
.1.'..-..ff'U...... [f [~ i.ril nn. ~ ('~'\.,
ilr~r- . -- l!JLJ;. i
lUG) APR I 5- 2003 ]WJ
I ~ ' . "i'I('" r.;~~['::--E .,,,._~-..._-."'
. U,("\,,, .J 01 ; ~\;r.:LOhV,..-i\',.I. ('"r',,'
C'J'YC-"" . ~. v 'v..;:!
,--_" 'I- ,LF.AP'NAIER .
~_.__._~ - ._--...;
APRIL 10, 2003
MR. WAYNE WELLS, AICP
SENIOR PLANNER
CITY OF CLEARWATER
VIA HAND DELIVERY
RE: CASE NO.FLD202-12045- AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE STATION
DEAR MR. WELLS,
ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND OUR RE-SUBMISSION OF TffiS REQUEST FOR REVIEW
BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE AT THEIR MEETING OF MAY 15,
2003.
KINDLY ADVISE THE TIME WE SHOULD APPEAR TO ANSWER QUESTIONS BY
THE COMMITTEE.
AS YOU WILL SEE, WE HAVE COMPLETELY REVISED THE SITE PLAN TO
ADDRESS THOSE CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF THE STAFF REPORT OF MARCH
13TH. WE PERCEIVE THOSE ELEMENTS TO BE:
* FAILURE TO MEET THE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE DOWNTOWN
DISTRICT.
* PERCEIVED TRAFFIC BOTTLENECKS AT THE NORTH END OF THE SITE
* STORM DRAINAGE SOLUTION wmCH DID NOT ADDRESS TREATMENT
IN THE DESIRED FASffiON.
TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS, WE HAVE MODIFIED THE SITE
ARRANGEMENT AS FOLLOWS;
1. THE CONVENIENCE STORE HAS BEEN MOVED TO THE EAST EDGE OF
THE SITE, CREATING PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY ACCESS FOR THOSE
TRAVERSING THE PINELLAS TRAIL. ACCESS, BIKE RACKS, AND REST
AREAS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. PARKING AND TRAFFIC HAS BEEN
REMOVED TO THE REAR OF THE SITE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE.
2. PUMPING STATIONS HAVE BEEN RELOCATED TO PROVIDE DIRECT
FLOW THRU THE SITE UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES.
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibarguen
Architects, Inc.
PROF. REG #AA - 0002922
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402 . St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(727) 821-6610 FAX: (727) 894-4216
.
.
Wedding~
MR. WAYNE WELLS
CASE NO. FLD2002-12045
APRIL 10, 2003
PAGE TWO
3. WE HAVE REVISED THE ROUTING OF STORM WATER TO CAUSE IT TO
PASS THROUGH OUR OPEN TREATMENT PONDS BEFORE PROCEEDING TO
THE STORAGE TANK AND TIlENCE TO THE OUTFALL ON CHESTNUT.
STREET. TillS TANK, OF COURSE WILL BE STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED
FOR TRUCK AND AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC TO CROSS IT AT ANY POINT. IT
WILL NOW SATISFY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS EXPRESSED.
WE TRUST THESE ADJUSTMENTS WILL REDUCE THE CONCERNS EXPRESSED
IN THE STAFF REPORT OF MARCH 13TH. HOWEVER, IF I MAY PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL DETAILS OR INFORMATION PRIOR TO YOUR MEETING, PLEASE
LET ME KNOW.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO THE PROCESSING OF TillS APPLICATION TO THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD AT THEIR JUNE 17 MEETING.
BEST REGARDS,
~~p WEDDING, FAIAlASLA
PRESIDENT
OBSOLETE
~ I 1-../ "
.0 I~Sd
tY''''6"GJ
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
THOMAS C. NASH, II, Esquire
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
ECORDING 400 Cleveland Street
Post Office Box 1669
E Clearwater, Florida 34617
9H;o
INST # ~.82146
OCT 14/ 1996 5:30PM
.
PINELLAS COUNTY FL~65
OFF.REC.BK 9493 PG
Til [e t~~ li,r\~-~I .
'.1.1.:. ..rL~'\ I~PR;~ 2003 . Ii Ii I ill
I! j 1___.___.._,.._, i i--.J I
n\~!t,\iC~ E- [;~..\; tL ()Pi\;:t: <,; L VC:J i
!.___.cnYOFCI r:M<'N,,\H
--"-->~~"~-'-"'.'-"--'~'''''-''--'---'"
WARRANTY DEED
T
S ---- THIS INDENTURE made this 14th day of October ,1996, by
----sO
I\Ltr~nd between DALTON R. JONES, an unmarried person of the County of
~inellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose
mailing address is 1064 Glenwood Drive, Dunedin, FL 34698, and THE
CEPCOT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, of the County of
Pinellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the Second Part, whose
mailing address is Post Office Box 6025/ Clearwater, FL 34618
mentary Tax Pd. $
/IJ
! I J tf, . .-
Intangible ial( f.'Q"
lark, Pinellas County
Deputy Clerk
That the
WIT N E SSE T H: .
said Party of the First Part, for and in consider-
ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to him in hand paid by the
said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of
the Second Part, and their assigns forever, the following described
land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of
Florida, to-wit:
The East 8 inches of Lot 6, all of Lot 7 and the West 30
feet of Lot 8, Block 13, COURT SQUARE, as recorded in
Plat Book 5, page 53, together with the North 1/2 of the
alley abutting the East 8 inches of Lot 6, all of Lot 7
and the West 30 feet of Lot 8, situate and lying in
Pinellas County, Florida.
Subj ect to 1996 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva-
tions and easements of record.
Parcel I.D. No. 16/2'9/1sir8648/bi3/0070
And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the
title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
S LETE
f'c., I()Se)
J '9~5D
1.. # 96-282147
OCT 14, 1996 5:30PM
.
PINELLAS COUNTY FLA.
OFF.REC.BK 9493 PG 6p7
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
THOMAS C. NASH, II, Esquire
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
400 Cleveland Street
Post Office Box 1669
Clearwater, Florida 34617
Ol~RECOIN
REC "
00 ~
UIT
FEES
~ . and between DALTON R. JONES, an unmarried person of the County of
~~~nellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose
TOTA '.A!d"7
· v'mailing address is 1064 Glenwood Drive, Dunedin, FL 34698, and
WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE made this 14th
day of October
, 1996, by
CLEARWATER DEPOT, INC., a Florida corporation, of the County of
Pine11as, in the State of Florida, Party of the Second Part, whose
mailing address is Post Office Box 6025, Clearwater, FL 34618
OoClUmentaryTax Pd. $ f~'.~.
$ IntMglblo Tax.Pdt:, WIT N E SSE T H:
Karleen F De Blaker, Cler' 'Plnenas Count!",
By Depvtx: C\eJ!It.
That the said Party of the First Part, for and in consider-
ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to him in hand paid by the
said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby
. . ~.
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of
the Second Part, and their assigns forever, the following described
land, situate lying and being in the County of Pine11as, State of
Florida, to-wit:
PARCEL I:
All of Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11, Block 13,
MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43, public
records of Pinellas County, Florida1 LESS right-of~way for
Chestnut Street together with that part of the South 1/2 of
the alley abutting Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11.
PARCEL II:
The West 23 feet o:e Lot 11 and the East 30 feet of Lot 12,
Block 13, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded' in P;L~t Book 3, page 43,
public records of.Pinel1as County, Florida, LESS right-of-way
for Chestnut Street, together with that part of the South 1/2
of the alley abutting the West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East
30 feet of Lot 12.
Subj ect to 1996 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva-
tions and easements of record.
Parcel I.D. No. 15/29/15/54450/013/0100
15/29/15/54450/013/0120
'.
LETE
.
.
OUNTY FLA.
PINELLAS C. 668
OFF.REC.BK 9493 PG .
And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the
title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has
hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above writ-
ten.
Print Name
t9~ ~~~C. 6>tI~.
STATE OF FLORIDA'
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I HEREBY C~RTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before
me, an officer duly authorized to n~ster and take
acknowledgments, DALTON R. JONES, to me nally k or who has
produced as ident~ ~ca and.who did
take an oath, and known to me to be the individual(s) described in
and who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged
before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein
expressed.
WITNESS my hand~nd official
and State, this ~ day of
Notary ublic 11f All,"
Print Name 1'IU II.A6
My Commission xpires:
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL
THOMAS CHARLES NASH II
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO CC4204705
MY COMMISSION EXP IAN 4 1999
l
7C073882 PAD 10-14-1996 17:20:00
01 OED-CLEARWATER DE~OT INt .
RECORDING 1 $10.50
- 2 - DOC STAMP - DR21. 9 3 $9f,A. on
E
TOTAL:.
CHECK AMT. TENDEREO;
CHAN<iE:
<<nO! L ~11
.. 7 r \'.. "
$97h.'50
$.[ COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as-appRcable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, Intensity
and development standards.
No variances other than the use itself are being requested in connection with this application. The project's low F.A. R
is well below the intensity standards set forth in the Clearwater City Codes.
Page 2 of 7 - Aexible Development ACS Sct~ Eevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
, .
.
, .
I' 2.
j.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive inti" redevelopment project or residential infill-project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
Again, our appraisal indicates that the proposed use is the highest and best for this site. "that be true then the
'development will increase and not adversely impact the property values of surrounding sites.
3. The uses within the comprehensive intin redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The uses proposed here are permitted in the City of Clearwater and they are not prohibited within the downtown
district zone.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive intin redevelopment project are compabble with adjacent land uses.
! I
Surrounding properties (warehouse and ral7road tract to the ,east, light manufacturing to the south, utility building to
the north and offICeS to the west with no residential immediately adjacent) dictates that the proposal is compatible with I
~s surroundings.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of ~luses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infiII redevelopment project are not
othelWise avaiable in the City of Clearwater.
",
.l
The suitability of the site is its avaHabl7ity to the traveling public. Court Street being one-way to the west and Chestnut
Street being one-way to the east (both streets abut this site) makes it particularly suitable for the public convenience.
There are no other known such sites between Chestnut and Court Streets.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project wi! upgrade the inmediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
The excessive landscaping and the use of Mediterranean architectural style are intended to create a visually pleasant
and compatible environment and win upgrade the immediate vicinity.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infiR redevelopmerit project aeates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the irTvnediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Care has been taken to use a style d architecture with strong reference to traditional historical character of cbNntown '
Clearwater. That design effort creates a form and ambiance that enhances the community character of the site.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate YicInity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
No lot width, setback, height and off-street parking variances have been requested, thus no"justification is called for.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity acc::ording to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of MicIe 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking In the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for developmeril
All code required parking will be contained on-site and there will be no on-street parking resulting from the
development of the site. Loading/unloacJing will be accomplished entirely within the site.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of MicIe 3 (as app6cable).
Use separate sheets as necessal)'. .
The project is speciflCB/ly designed to meet the design guidelines of the Downtown District and with this design we
believe we have accomplished that purpose. '
Page 3-Gf 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
o SOlETE .
E. 'SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL f
IREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) .
\ Cl SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4- or greatel), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
QI - LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; SEE COVER SHEET.
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (Ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used In determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Nole: Buikfmg permits will not be Issued until evidence of recording a final plat Is provided);
o COpy OF RECORDED PlAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
III SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24- x 36"):
..1L AI dimensions; ".:
..1L North arrow:
..z... Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one Inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
.1t. Location map; .
-X.. Index sheet referencing individual sheets Included in package;
-X.. Footprint and size of al EXlSnNG buikfmgs and structures;
...x... Footprint and size of aU PROPOSED buildings and structures;
..x.. All required setbacks;
..1L All existing and proposed points of access;
..1L All required sight triangles;
J1i.A Identification of envlronrnentaUy unique areas, such as watercourses, weUands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wilcllife habitats, ete;
Location of an public and private easements;
Location of an street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, Including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and flft stations, gas
and water lines;
AD parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
DepletIon by shading or crosshatching d al required parking lot Interior landscaped areas;
Location of al solid waste containers, rec:ycIing or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per
Section 3-201(O)(i) and Index #701);
Location of al landscape material; SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET.
Location of al jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of aa onsite and offsite storm-water ma~nt facilities; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Location of an outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of an existing and proposed sidewalks
-X...
-X-
-X-
.1L
-L
...x...
.1L
-X...
-X-
-X-
-X-
\.
il SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, In writtenJlabular form:
~
-L
.1L
.1L
x
.1L
~
~
.1L
.1L
Land area In squa~ feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the .number of required spaces;
Total paved ar.ea,lncluding all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed In square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
SIze and species of an landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of aa existing utlfrty easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Aoor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
G REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible
O. FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
Nl.A One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
-
-
-
-
-
-
,..--
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed storrnwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist-, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflectjng size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page.A of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
OBSOLETE
. . '~. lJ~NDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTJI.EQUIREMENTS: (Section"4-1102.A)
'Qj
.:X.
-1L
.~
x-
~
..x...
itA
..x...
-1L
.1L
m
all
B/A
WA
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas Including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Delineation and dimensions of an required perimeter landscape buffers; .
Sight visibility triangles; . .
Delineation and dimensions of an par1dng areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey); .
Location, size, desaiption, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape mater1als, Including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mUlching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered; .
Conditions of a previous deve~ent approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible)
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
-",
".
~.
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application. as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMmAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
Q STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
ExIsting topography extending 50 feet beyond an property lines;
Proposed grading Including finished floor eJevations of aD structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stonnwater detentlonlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of FIor1da registered Professional Engineer on an plans and calculations
Q COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMmAL
(SWFWMD approval Is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if appflcable
Q COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, If applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) "
Required In the event the apprlCation Includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tou~t and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Resldentlallnfin Project.
aI BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - aD sides of an buikfmgs including height dimensions, colors and materials
01 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -foursldes of building with colors and mater1a1s to scale (8 %X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required SEE RENDERING INCLUDED WITH APPLICATION.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) SEPARATE APPLICATION WILL BE FILED LATER.:-
Q All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they win be removed or
to remain.
Q An PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
Q Comprehensive Sign Program appflCatlon, as applicable (separate app6cation and fee required).
Q Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11 ) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
CBS
LETE
'-
.
.
. ~ K: :TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
- . b IncJude as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of Service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
_ C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement
';'
L.SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that an representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in.this apprtcation.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS J"1d
~to and subsaibed before me this .!..l.!::. day of
!~a,..I"/d AD. 2O~ to me and/or by
~P. .et!lM!.... . who IS personaJly known , has
produced as
identification.
~ j. JlLtfyd.
My commission expires:
'~
'{;
...r1
~ MY COMMISSIOH # CC855415 EXPIRES
Auaust 7, 2003
1CNOID1IIU>>~ IItllIME INC.
4. . Page6 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
OBSOLETE
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
The Cepcot.Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
(Names of al property owners) .
1. . That (I arrWte are) the owner(s) and record title hoIder(s) of the following desaibed property (address or geoeraIlocation):
657 Court Street (Clearwater Train Station Restaurant)
651 Court Street (WARC Thrift Store).
640-642 Chestnut Street (Freedom Park)
2. That this property coostituteS the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Flexible Development Application - r.~T~hp.n~ivp. Tnfill Rp.dp.vp.lopmp.n~ ~TOjP~~
City of Clearwater
"
l.
3. That the undersigned (hasnuwe) appointed and (~) appoint C.lhmElolph llpdding.lF.d AT1II!'ZtTnng, 1l.~1"iTP
as (hIsJthe1r) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other cJoaments necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this aIIidaYit has been executed to indUce the Ciy of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act'on the above descriled property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that al impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic. etc.) wiI be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a buikfll'l9 penni.
certificate of occupanc.y, or other mechanism. whIc;heYer occurs first;
5. That $Ie visIs to the property are necessary by Ciy representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property desai>ed in this application;
6. That (IIwe). the.underslgned authority, hereby cettify that the
James P. Eisch, .COO
STATE
COUNTY OF P1NBlAS
..... me........................ duly commissioned I!r........ olJbo __ ~~ 00 this. ,1JI. ""'..
Dpt.'JH~, ~")... personalyappearecl ";!AtlJI!.( ~fd.S.lH-- ... whohavingbeenfirstdulyswom
Deposes and says that heIshe fully understands the contents of the affidavi that heI~ signed. ;' V' L1t "I' ~. ~
My Commission ExpIres: m~ KarenS. Mcleod ;;;::K:.Af4U A. ~
~.: : : MYCOMMISSIOHI CClS5415 EXPIES 1---7 HotaIy Pub6c
-.,; . "ll Auaust 1, 2003
",'-""jO,~" 1ClHOfI)1l<<lifllOYFMl IHC
S:\Ranning DepattmentlApplication Fonnsldevelopment teView\2002 Forms~prehensive Intill application 2002.doc
aBS
lETE
..l
Page 7 of 7 _ Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
. .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION r:OR
APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL.
Parcel No. 15/29/15/54450/013/0100
All of Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11. Block 13,
MAGNOLIA PARK. as recorded in Plat Book 3. Page
43. pubnc Records of Pinellas County, Florida. LESS
right-of-way fOf Chestnut street. together with that
part of the South ~ of the alley abutting Lot 10 and
the East 27 feet of Lot 11.
Parcel No. 15129/15/54450/013/0120
The West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30 feet of Lot
12. Block 13. MAGNOLIA PARK. as recorded in Plat
Book 3. Page 43, Public Records of Plnellas County.
Florida, LESS right-of-way for Chestnut Street,
together with that part of the South. % of the alley
abutting the West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30
feet of Lot 12.
Parcel No. 15129/15/186481013/0070
The East 8 inchet~ of Lot 6. all of Lot 7 and the West
30 feet of Lot 8. Block 13. COURT SQUARE. as
recorded In Plat Book 5. Page 53. Public Records of
Pinellas County. Florida, together with the North ~ of
the alley abutting the East 8 inches of Lot 6, all of Lot
7 and the West Z.O feet of Lot 8. situate and lying in
Pinellas County, f'lorida.
Parcel No. 161291"15/186481013/0090
Lot 9 and the East 20 feet of Lot 8. Block 13,
MAGNOLIA PARI<. as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page
43, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
#284902 v1 - CepcotlLegal Descrlptic'n
BS LET
"
\
EXHIBIT A
...U'
.........
.n...
.........
.'....
--
.......
~
......
--
.::'...
.&1...
--
o
~
en
o
r-
m
-I
m
.Si;._
.::'..
~
@~T~..~~VATION STATION f1
NQtE: NORTH ELEVATION ~nl HAND
.4f. %~
@~TI~.~~VATION STATION f2
NOTE: IllATH UYATlDN DPf'OIITI HaND
lit::
7 EAST ELEVATION STATION f1
SCAl..E: 1/'-.1'-0-
@=TI~.~~!.VATION STATION f2
'-.-
-.......,
_ICI_ \
-+;f--
..~.
0.'"
J.
lr--"'I
=-~~...
.......
~ SOUTH ELEVATION
KALE: 1/'-.1'-0-
D
otS
Iii
l\!'" a
III
ti~l\! ~
11111)... ..J
a: 11111) ...
liili'" III
...III~ ...
~~u i
8~.... ...
~lB d
u
! !j
II)
z
o
...
~~'r
..I .
III r
a: S
o
...
a:
III
...
)(
III
~3."IJ
O. u~
i~
!w-M.
"1'.
W
a:
1-0
WI-
WCI)
a:W
1-0
Cl)Z
I-W
a:Z
::)W
0>
Oz
o
o
... ......-..-.-
.--
-.
'fUDID"W 'lBLYIIlIQ'D
.l.33tU.S .LI:I'lo::I 199
:aIO.1S 3:JIGItBANO:)
.133H.1S .ull'lOO
.~-=~ I .LDlS tsAOO10: g
....,.,,.,..
.. -
@b
~ ~ ~
~ 5 ~
i I ! I! ~
c::::J t lil'l =
I ~! w=_ ~ ~
!~ ~== =~I g ~
t i i :~I Illlbiil i ~
~ I 5 i~5 ~ ..i5lal i ~
~:J _ ii-....-..-.. u- ~
qjjb .ill III ~~rid i:i:i:i;;~~ i~
;- 13 S _ cd]
~
~(Q
[!!!!l~
[!!!!l@
@Sd
~l!!b
@
m
~@S
@S[!!!!l
2)~
@~
~~
@S
~~
l!@[!!!!l
<?@d
~
31310S 0
,..",'
.
Do..1
-~----;n:;----T--.7- Ll
~._-
IICflON 11. ,....1' II IOUfN. fWIIC 11 IAlT
~
_'" 1A111: ......
KAa.C; 1- . 10'
en
..... fJI Inl . aOll." 10. Pl.
. ."4 ACMI
r
m
--I
m
I:'~'=:,,:u.::,.~==:..~""'''''''
.-.....
l!
i -
.. I:
~ :r
Ii:
i j .:e"-
S -
!lI :a n_
Il ::~=-""
...
l1' .-
... . ., ......-.-
.. _'_11&
-..
~j.J!:'; E::G~'::':-: Jf..~i\I:'-
Ui".iUii-.,.....m...... ....::I:"...r:..-:: '" II. ...
..... II I
=-.-;.~..lJUt.!N"=Z ::a." \It '''.rIP_if; -..a
er-e F..i:.--:Jf"::-_"a't.W1t':.:5..E:,~
-.111
lr lIllr'ft "l:J.:'I..Itll'.:.."t'l:.:"'m~ "'-
:".:c'. ..:-J::rr-'JC:......-c.:.-:=.:......-:.a ,~~..
-..
mt'IFJ':Ptla: :r:rjl=.+1ZG.~=P.,......
..-:"~-1
I
I
I
.:.'---~
............ _. --&lI .. b a
______________________~---.--w.~---~- ~-----
/ ----t-~-rt_-c::sTN:iT-WEi~--~-i---.
, ....:..-:._ II. ...,---'=""
... .. ...... . - ........
nOli Zona x. c:o...ny ,..I ,,__ 00110
lIIYa... 1"1'"
.
..
.....,.. "'I:
.... IIlU'U" ......, ...... .. uu. .......
,s I _,eM,. ,. .... ..... .....
'Mlu.. ... IIln..u. ,. en, II e......_
uunt, .....
FI"'" ~':'~I_". ._
cwo'u'"", ,r ...,...."u.. ... 71.
JCB
.... ... -.- ....
r~::=. "mh '~~L'"
'....'1. PI" ."...
.. ...
ICIUtlDARY IURVEY lIITH
Dl'ADVIMINTS
II. ., I . I D II'
.. _"I.
t 1lIV1_"........"...
&All It ruf " ..... .
....
........
rtI "'" ...
....... ......
...... Of
..... ...
... . IIIIIlI'lI .11..,..
-
.........._............ ........... ,It_
-.. ........ ..... ---. ...........
... __ _IMPS .. ....... ..... ... ..,.......
... ....... .. ... ......... ...... ... II . ,.....
~......... --,
...........,..-...-.......
-..--_.....~,_...
----.--...........-,...
--........ta.,..,..._......
C E R T I FIe A T ION
..... c. _. AIlll _lArD. IOC.
COftaultln. En.tn..... and L.'" IurvlY....
IAIII 011 ....S..... .... II..AI. ANII.U..........
1__ -'." UII&... --.....- __ __ ........-....
............. flIP. -.....u.. _.
SHEET 1 OF 1
O!I ~~i_WE.
. 1L~ ......."l!:lo.
. I . "':::r:JS.=:-
WJlII"1J 'lBJ.vNl'l3'13
L -n-I,
NVld 3!)VNl'I~
.. gmlMl9 '9N1N1d
Q
~
~ .1~ LS9
3W.1S J:lN3INJt\NlJ:)
~.1S .1~
I."" 10.11
~il
I ~:;:;;:;;
;,
'.
{
.
..
"
..'
.
"Ii.,
S 'mmETE
IJ
rij
u
~
:Vuu$
~!W'M.
\flIIllII'1J 'llJJ.VAW3'l:l
~- m 1m
1 -Mol. · ~
.;. I..,. 3JlS unnn i (J
-:=:SF
~J.SJ.~~
:nms ~
~J.SJ.~
~!,
I~;=;;
:)
(
"
.
.
..
.
"
..'
.
..
CBS LETE
~.
~-'II
VtDllInJ 'Ol!"~
n3lOS """ '" '. ....1311 3US
~S J::INJ1N3N<<J:) ..,....
J.33&S .urm -::
I I
II II
I
~ . !
~~ & I ~
1;1 Ii ~
... I I
rl 'll
~ . ,l ~ III I
. Ib I
" ~l I
~~.. '''- Ii: I "'lld
<I I,
w '.'
:; I ! YI~~! Is
" II I
" I \.11
I
!I "
I
.
II '?
I.
I
TE
~
1m
L ~~llld
iilll I ~ ~J;
Ii! I
~. II
L9111
IBin
~ ~ I; !I~ I
I . i' I ,I I
! 111~II'h I
! I ,~I I I I
d a~IG!p!;!~ I
I ~Il"h!ilci! I
-ii-all!;:!; I
h!III' pi "'l
hili! 11.~1
P~~9. HIli.
.. .. .. of .... ~ II.. tI II .. tI tI of II ..
J
J
-<
:>
C)
Z
....
Zol
:c~
~i
o
uan9nwTT
Jg~
~~
'IOltlO"U 'tI31_7D
,,~ m
CIDlO'D cWIn. z
-- ~
_m I
.:::.
I' .........
~
N'f1d ~,
1m
...-
-~..
........':2..
.l33t1.lS .ltll'lO:J LS9
3l:IO.lS 3:JN3IN3ANO:J
.l33t1.lS .ll:lOO:J
.......-~
'--=r-
..
III I
ll!
;nl~
..J)
lP
u ·
I
I
I' ~
I'
r---!' : .
I I I
- I I I I
... .0Il IS3Ill'A Il/lI ..-, 1$"13 I I I I
1--.. . --f- ---+ _ -+ - -t- - +-- f-- -I-- of -I- --1- -l_- -t- - -f-.B -I I
---t---I--+-- _:!- __- - - I 1 I I
_ _ _.' _ ;=~+J
. I : I
· H I
II I:;;
· I Ill! I
II l;nl~
· I I ji)
I : 1= ~
I D IX ~
· t!i
I I
I
I
\ I
. r I
I I I
~+ -------r----
I - I -----
I I I
I I
........ .......:Ii I
Ik.. ~
----- -
---- .----;OJ
':5- I
..... J
;:,.~
"'Nil
i
_----------J
..
,
I
.e.
'"1---
I
I
'i;.
1&9
!I u C
i 10?1t ~.~
~ . "
,-,
e 88El8El
..
z
-c
...J
0.
Ill,
0.,
-c.
u,
lIl'
0-
jl
..'
S LETE
,.
01 ~g~ iii ..
u....~~'U m --=
. . '9~ ~"'i~_.
~ ..."......,........
. --=;---
~-
!I
'101110", 'tB1 ._""13
51IY!30 3dY~1
1'f:l IdA!
".. MGIfW
1331:1!5 UflO:l LS9
3tJO!5 3:lN3IN3I>NO:l
!331:1!5 !l:IflO:l
is
!Ii
u ~ I I I!
~ iI ~ ~, ~
~ I :: I b-i
, ~ ~ ~;: ~ i .::~.~
Ii 1!5 ~ Ie" = !lilli'
i- ! ii~ I I ;Ij:ll
I-! id~1I ! ~i nl:lI~i
! !' i::l!l, a I ll:lji! l!
I I f!i . .i ~I d
~ I! ; ~i~=1 i Ii ;:b
lilli, ~,;l.:l t !i lah
..J
...
<C
....
1&I
CI
III
Z
...
....
Z
<C
..J
Go
;i
....,
..
~..
!a.
~t~1
III
..J
...
<C
....
1&I
CI
....
Z
1&I
a ::I:
HJ ...
"H CI
ai tf
-15
ii
i
I
II
.
a
!fg
rnru
!! .
i'"
~
..J
...
<C
....
1&I
CI
III
Z
...
....
Z
<C
..J
Go
GI,
ii!j
/li,
:]!
I-.-t
ir
M~
"'1
4.&>>0
s
,
~
;,
. I
~ ~ II
~ ... I; 1,...1 I !
= !. I! II i~ ,:1
I li I..~ I' ~i !I.
1Ilselll!
e i ih: I! Ii!! ;=
.. !!iUI~I~uJ
I
..J
...
<C
....
1&I
CI
III
Z
...
....
Z
<C
..J
Go
3i
<C
Go!!
o
1331:115 ltlOO:l LS9
3I:1015 3:lN3IN3ANO:l
1331:115 ll:11lO:l
uta
Jg~
~
'I011lln.:l 'tl31_713
~
NY"ld 3115
NOI1YA~3S~ 331:11
I
I
I-
I-
r---! -
I
.
..
Pi I
liil~
..iI
R =
,
I
.e.
I
I
I
~i---
I
I
.
'i;.
BS
lE E
\.
mm
II _
j......
-1
~
..J
a.
III
..
..
UI
Z
C
..
..
c
iX
III
UI.
Ill'
a:.
a.'
Ill:'
!i
'1011:10"1,,1 'tl31\'_71:I
~
NY"1cl 3.LI S
rn'"
I .
i'"
<(
01 ii =-.
uC)~'"'_-=
~ ...1:t~..
~ .;~~
Ina ......
J.33l:lJ.S J.tlflO:l lS9
3l:IOJ.S 3:lN3IN3ANO::I
J.33t:1J.S J.I:IOOO
...
I I
I · I
II Ii! lild~i
_ .'Ld!J .1
.0' . ..Jfi!P.I..b
I ;;::~I!:I~:.;~:;;
~ .. .CIS _. JO/llI :.IOAy 1SY3
.. ...
ifi
b~
.
..J
...
oC
I-
...
C
C!)
zz
...C!)
~...
a: en
oC
a.c
a.~
oC .
UCl)~
ti~a
~~:l
:z:enil
1')'
..J
...
oC
....
....
c
...
a:
:l
en
o
..J
U
Z
...
a:
.....
~~
--~- ~W
Ao." =
.9 LJJ
!II....
YOlllO"U 'lal_3"I:I
~
NYlcI 3115
NOI1I"1OH30
rnru
1I .
i'C'"i
<(
DI~~i~
""20 .....
1331:1.l5 .ll:lflO:) LS9
3tlO.l5 3::lN3IN3ANO:l
1331:1.l5 .ll:lflO:)
..
..
! I
b..~_ ~ ' I ~ I
ihf. .riJ.~tMf
I ~~:!~:I;;:~~:;;
w
t.
I
I
.~
~,J!. Ii.
!il ~ i!ll'
iSle iii.
! 1II.5iI ~ C II~
i'I~. ~ I ~I!JIiI
...
ill
I I
q.
I "
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
Ii
I
I
I
U
.1
il
..
h:'
.
LETE
s-
d~ .ed
elt.
!d
(f)
r-
!!1
m
,>",'
~"I'~
.M:
.r.l9:
.M:
U~:
-+If.--
.M:
.M:
.I!l':
U~:
-+If.--
.M:
.M:
.M:
.M:
'-
--,
-- \
@ NEIT !l.!VATION
. ICM.II .Ir......
.M:
.M:
-+M-
.M:
@~~;r~ATION ~
@~~~.;vATION
D
otS
Ili
ImU
~I! I
I
...
!~
I
~3'.!.J
'I011lO"U 'lI31_:f13
~
NY1d NOllY~I~
~I .:l~1l1 tfY"1Il:lIH3A
1.lze ......
R
~
01 ~ii ~
. 'll ~ ":'~_'
_ ~ --:.:.s-:.-='
13~lS 1~~ lS9
~lS 3:lN3IN3ANlX)
13~lS 1~
.
I
I
10 I
I
I
I
__ I I I
.. .5 lS3....A MIl ~y JSd I I I I
+- "--- -1-" --"- -+ - -t- _ -t- _ +- -I-- -I--" -I- --1--1- -t-- -I- J_I I
-~-f--+--_-=- _=- - - - I 11 I I
..~~J
. I
nl
· n I
It It;
· I Ill! I
II lliil~
· I I iil
I : !i 2
D I 'fr
'I .
t'l' j~
;J\I ~
i
. 1\
I I
I
I
'0
r---! 0
I
t
I
I
I
I
oi-
I
I
".SS'. ..... I
---- .--1------~
..:i" I
_..0 J
;:,.;1
II "'.wi
~ I a. )
. P I ii I
I I I _------------J
r-li------------r--
I I
I
.
z
oC
..J
G.
iii .
G.T
~,
:g:..
~i
....
S lETE
'"
.
'.
m Wedding
MEMO
FROM:
RE:
SUBJ:
DATE:
WAYNE WELLS
SENIOR PLANNER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
VIA HAND DELIVERY
C.RANDOLPH WEDDING FAIA/ASLA
CASE FLD2002-12045- 657 COURT STREET
RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS OF 2/12/03
02/18/03
TO:
DEAR MR. WELLS,
THERE FOLLOWS OUR RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS THAT WERE SENT TO US VIA E-
MAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER OUR MEETING WITH THE DRC ON JAN 16. WE HA VE
RESPONDED IN THE SAME ORDER THAT THE COMMENT APPEARED ON YOUR E-MAIL:
1. ENVIRONMENTAL:
STORMWA TER PLAN HAS BEN REVISED AND IS RESUBMITTED HEREWITH.
2. FIRE:
THE BUILDING WILL MEET ALL FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF PERMITS.
3. GENERAL ENGINEERING:
REVISED SITE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN IS PROVIDED WITH THIS
SUBMISSION, TO INCLUDE 6400 CF OF STORAGE CAPACITY.
4. HARBOR MASTER:
THANK YOU.
5. LAND RESOlJRCE:
a. A TREE PROTECTION SHEET HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE PACKAGE.
6. LANDSCAPING:
a. OAKS HAVE BEEN RE-SPACED.
b. LANDSCAPE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ALONG WITH THE OVERALL
LAYOUT. MORE LAYERING INCLUDED, BUT EASE OF MAINTENANCE AND
esse lETE COLD-TOLERANCE HAVE STILL BEEN OBSERVED AS CRITICAL.
c. SOD HAS REPLACED INDIAN HAWTHORN IN TREE ISLAND.
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibargiien
Architects, Inc.
PROF. REG. #AA - 0002922
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402 . St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(727) 821-6610 FAX: (727) 894-4216
.
.
Wedding ~
MEMO
WAYNE WELLS
JANUARY 29,2003
PAGE TWO
7. PARKS AND RECREATION:
THANK YOU.
8. PLANNING:
a. BUFFERS HAVE BEEN DIMENSIONED.
b. TERMINAL ISLANDS AR SHORTENED TO EASE TRAFFIC FLOW.
c. SITE DATA HAS BEEN CORRECTED.
d. SERVICE ISLANDS HAVE BEEN RE-DESIGNED; A TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
e. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE PROVIDED.
f. UNDERSTOOD.
g. COLORS HAVE BEEN NOTED ON ELEVATIONS.
h. SIGNAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED AT A LATER TIME; SHOWN AS DOTTED
AREAS FOR GENERAL UNDERSTANDING ON ELEVATIONS.
9. SOLID WASTE:
a. STANDARD DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED
10. STORMWATER:
a. A NEW CONCEPT IS PROVIDED TO PROVIDE THE 6400 C.F. REQUESTED
FOR ONE HOUR DURATION.
11. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING:
a. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES WILL BE PAID WHEN REQUESTED.
BEST REGARDS,
~ING
PRESIDENT
-
BS lETE
.
';6rwater
o~
~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): -'- .
ATLAS PAGE#:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 11/05102)
...., PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT...., use additional sheets as n~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.Al
RECEIV
APPLICANT NAME: THE CEPCOT CORPORATION
MAILING ADDRESS: 14480 62nd STREET NORTH. CLEARWATER, FT. 'B760
ENT
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ieisch@cepcot.us
PHONE NUMBER: 727-531-8913
:;,EKVICES
cln 0. c....U..;'v'VA ER
CELL NUMBER:
813-205-5300
FAX NUMBER:
727-536-8066
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
THE CEPCOT CORPORATTON' r.T.RARtJATRR TRATN ~TATTON, TNr. (f/k/1'l
(Must include AlL owners)
CLEARWATER DEPOT. INC.)
AGENT NAME(S): RANDY WEDDING
MAILING ADDRESS: 300 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH. SJUTIL402., ST. PETERSBURG.~-FL 33701
E-MAILADDRESS:randycawec.lding1.lTl.hit.PI."t.A I'"nm
PHONE NUMBER: 727-821-6610
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
727-894-4216
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS ofsubjectsite: 657 COURT STREET. r.T.RARtJATRR. FT. ~~7'lR
ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A"
(if not listed here, ptease note the location of this document in the submittal)
16/29/25/18648/01~/0070;1'l/?q/l'l/'l~~'lO/Ol~/nlnn;1'l!?911'l!5~~5n/nl~!nl?n
0.95A; 41. 341 SQ. FT.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: CONVENIENCE STORE (3200 SQ. FT.) AND FUEL DISPENSARY
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL NUMBER S :
PARCEL SIZE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR RETRO FIT FIT OF EXISTING SITE
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
DOES 'THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE Tf<ANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
, documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
II SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6) COPIES OF DEEDS ATTACHED.
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
II Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
The surrounding commercial warehouse, light industrial, office and utility substation uses are all compatible with the
proposed development. . The height and bulk of the proposal are less than any of the adjacent uses.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
. Our appraiser has told us that the use proposed is the highest and best use for this specifIC tract. Keep in mind that
. there is an existing railroad track to the east of the site and that this facility will sit across from a ware~ouse to the east.
What is proposed will represent an upgrade to the properties both to the east and south. No hann will be done to the
. properties to the west or north.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or Working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
There is no immediate resiciential use adjacent to the site. Indeed no residential properties abut or are across from this site. The PineHas Trail to
the east will be buffered along at least 80% percent of its length along East Street and thus not adversely affected by the proposal Entry to the site
will be from the north and the south from Court Street and Chestnut Stree~ both being one-way thoroughfares.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Court Street adjoins the site to the north and is one-way to the west. Chestnut Street which adjoins the site to the
. south is one-way east. Thus the North and South ingress and egress creates no turning problems in connection with
the flow of traffic. Delivery vehicles will be able to pass through the site without backing up into or blocking either
~ Chestnut or Court Streets.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
.j The site presently is bounded by a railroad/light industrial area to the east. There is a utility substation under
. Fonstructiontothe norttiatld there are commercial properties, banks, office buildings and the like, to the south and
.; 'west. What is proposeahere is completely consistent with the sUlTOundLng environment.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, induding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
T~e design p'ropo.sed will i"!prove the s~e visually ~nd th~re wi/~ be a?*!,?uate buftering from properties to the west.
Since no resIdential properties face the site or exist In the Immediate VICinity there IS no adverse impact on residential
uses.
~. --
Q Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
No variances other than the use itself are being requested in connection with this application. The project's low F.A.R.
is well below the intensity standards set forth in the ClealWater City Codes.
Page 2 of 7 - Aexible Development Ap~lication - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
o SOLETE
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infiU..project will not
. reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
A,ga}n, our appraisal indicates that the proposed use is the highest and best for this site. If that be troe then the
development will increase and not adversely impact the property values of surrounding sites.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The uses proposed here are permitted in the City of Clearwater and they are not prohibited within the downtown
district zone.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
Surrounding properties (warehouse and railroad tract to the east, light manufacturing to the south, utility building to
the north and offices to the west with no residential immediately adjacent) dictates that the proposal is compatible with ,
its surroundings.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
The suitability of the site is its availability to the traveling public. Court Street being one-way to the west and Chestnut
Street being one-way to the east (both streets abut this site) makes it particularly suitable for the public convenience.
There are no other known such sites between Chestnut and Court Streets.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
The excessive landscaping and the use of Mediterranean architectural style are intended to create a visually pleasant
and compatible environment and will upgrade the immediate vicinity.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Care has been taken to use a style of architecture with strong reference to traditional historical character of downtown
Clearwater. That design effort creates a form and ambiance that enhances the community character of the site.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
No lot width, setback, height and off-street parking variances have been requested, thus no justification is called for.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
All code required parking will be contained on-site and there will be no on-street parking resulting from the
development of the site. Loading/unloading will be accomplished entirely within the site.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
The project is specifically designed to meet the design guidelines of the Downtown District and with this design we
believe we have accomplished that purpose.
, Page 3 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- Ci~y of Clearwater
E.SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL RE:....:JIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
Ol SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and Indicating trees to be removed);
Ql LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; SEE COVER SHEET.
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (Ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
II
.1L
.1L
.1L
.A..
..x..
..x..
..x..
-x-
-A..
x
NO...
..x..
~
~
.1L
..x....
..x...
.JL
..x..
..x..
...2L
...2L
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing Individual sheets included In package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
AU required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (0)(1) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material; SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET.
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all ooslte and offsite storm-water management facilities; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
m SITE DATA TABLE forexlsting, required, and proposed development, in wrlttenltabularform:
~
~
.1L
x
x
..A...
~
~
1L
.lL
Land area in squa~ feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units:
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; ,
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
QI: REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
Nl};. One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
OOsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); B S 0 lETE
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned):
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of ClealW ater
. .
. G.LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section"4-1102.A)
di
..1L
..1L
~
x' -
..1L
...x...
m
~
-1L
..1S...
w
181
rsJjA
filA
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets:
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey): .
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and Interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previOUS deve1e>pment approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); ..,
Irrigation notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible)
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
Q STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
Q COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LEITER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
Q COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) .
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentlallnfjll Project.
iJ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
ClI REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color'rendering, if
possible) as required SEE RENDERING INCLUDED WITH APPLICATION.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) SEPARATE APPLICATION WILL BE FILED LATER.:-
Q All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
Q All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
Q Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).qQ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
S LETE
Page 5 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater
.
.
K: 'TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
a Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Enginee(s Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
. C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described inthis application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS J"UJ
;w. to and subsaibed before me this ~ day of
~ IJ,,"I. ~D. 20.Q.g.. to me and/or by
P. ~ . who is personallv known r has
produced as
identification.
~ 1.. J/{tft-J
My commission expires:
{.f' i). MYCOMMISSION#CC8Ss.415 EXPIRES
~~ i Auaust 7, 2003
""( . IONOID THNl1Iov F~ IN9\lRAN€f; INC
III
(Ere
.;. Page 6 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
The -Cepcot Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
(Names of an property owners)
1. . That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the fol1owing described property (address or general location):
657 Court Street (Clearwater Train Station Restaurant)
651 Court Street (UPARC Thrift Store)
640-642 Chestnut Street (Freedom Park)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Flexible Development Application - CnmpTp.hp.n~ivp. Tnfill Rp.np.vp.lnpmp.n~ ~Tnjp~~
City of Clearwater
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint Co RSlnnnl ph TJpnning!F.n AT'1II!:I~Tnng, F.!:I'lUiTP
as (hisJUlelr) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) win be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application;
6. That (1Iwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foreg .
James P. Eisch, .COO
STATE
COUNTY OF P1NaLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned IlY the laws oUhe~tate of F}orIda, on this /1"" day of
npl'.'JHbv., ~C(1~ personally appeared -;r1h:lJ1!.( ~E..lstLL- .. who having been first duly swom
Deposes ~nd. says ~at helshe fully ~nderstandS the contents of the affidavit that helshe signed. II W "I' ~ .I
My CommISSIOn expires: ~ Karen S. Mcleod ;;k;"Al4U .,Ltl. ~
~.€ L'A"?E~ MY COMMISSIOH # CClS5415 EXPIfS f---7 Notary Pub6c
~.~t'~ AuaU$t 7, 2003
".'("'-;.,"d;." BOHOroTHRUlaovfAIH tNC
S:\FJannlng DepartmentlApplicatlon Fotms\development review\2002 Fotms\comprehensive InflH application 2002.doc
aBS
LETE
.;.
Page 7 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION r-OR
APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL
Parcel No. 15/29/15/54450/013/0100
All of Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11. Block 13,
MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded In Plat Book 3. Page
43. Public Records of Plnellas County, Florida. LESS
right-of-way for Chestnut street, together with that
part of the South % of the alley abutting Loi 10 and
the East 27 feet of Lot 11.
Parcel No. 15/29/15/54450/013/0120
The West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30 feet of Lot
12, Block 13, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded In Plat
Book 3. Page 43. Public Records of Plnellas County,
Florida. LESS right-of-way for Chestnut Street.
together with that part of the South . % of the alley
abutting the West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30
feet of Lot 12.
Parcel No. 15/29/15/18648/013/0070
The East 8 inchen of Lot 6, all of Lot 7 and the West
30 feet of Lot 8. Block 13, COURT SQUARE. as
recorded In Plat Book 5, Page 53, Public Records of
Pine lias County. Florida. together with the North ~ of
the alley abutting the East 8 inches of Lot 6. all of Lot
7 and the West ZoO feet of Lot 8. situate and lying in
Pinellas County. f'lorlda.
Parcel No. 161291"15/18648/01310090
Lot 9 and the East 20 feet of Lot 8, Block 13.
MAGNOLIA PARI<. as recorded In Plat Book 3. Page
43, of the Public Records of Pinellas County. Florida.
#284902 v1 - Cepcot/Legal Descriptic'n
BS LETE
EXHIBIT A
YOIIlll'J 'tl31_313
!3~!S !~~ LS9
~!S 3ON3IN3^NO~
1331:US !1:IflO~
("
I
..-J
z
~ S
. ...
~
>
I&J
..J
I&J
...:
..,,:,
'I'U
.. ..
..
z
zo
0'"
......
...~
~...
"'In
In
Z
zo
. 0'"
! ......
. ...~
I. ~>
! >I&J
. I&J..J
=1 dl&J
:~ ...~
" Ina:
I&JO
3lZ
rn~
....1iiIa. i
p..(~ ~.
SNOUY^313 lIDIl:l3!X3 i ~
.
i z
o
...
...
~
>
I&J
..J
I&J
:I:
...
:>
o
In
.....
::: 'I'U
..I'U .. ..
.. ~ ..
z z
oz w zo
"'0 0'"
...... I ......
~... ...~
...~ ~...
In'" ~ "'In
Zln In
Z
oz : ! zo
"'0 ~ 0'"
...... ......
~... ; I! ... ~
>~ ~> ~
I&J> . >I&J;"
..JI&J ! .1 I&J..J -'
I&J..J :~ dl&J ~
I&J i
:I: 'I"'~ ::
!U ...... """"--'
:>In In:>"
o~ i ~51 ~ ~
InI&J U
1I'l' CD'
~ ~ {
\
B lETE
(I)
r-
m
-I
m
+ SilI'_
+!ll!I'_
+lfl!i_
-+li!ir-
SOUTH ELEVATION STATION '11
@~T'/I~~~ATION STATION '2
NDTI: NIIIITM AND .., II.IYAn_ ....nl HAND
+SilI'_
+!ll!I'_
,....
==-
=.....
-
..-.....
--
1IloMe......
~
EAST ELEVATION STATION '11
6 SOUTH ELEVATION STATION '2
KM.I:: I,...'.....
NEST ELEVATION STATION .11
7 NORTH ELEVATION STATION '2
ICM.I: 111-., .....
RECEIVED
JAN 3' 1. 2003
PLANI\lIl\Ju Ot Ul:.Vl:.LUPMENT
SEr~VICES
CITY OF CLEAKWATER
+ l'J.f:
-+H:--
-+H:--
+M
+M:
~
U!I!I:
+r.I!I:
+1'11:
+1:I!I:
+:~:
+1'J.r:
+l'i.f:
+~I!f.
Ilft'll"_
........-. "".
.........."'.
U'A:
+M:
+1:;':
Hi!f.
Illrl'l':r..
'--,
--
@~TIJ~~~ATION
i
'-=-
--... ......,
~ SOUTH ELEVATION
ICM.I: 1'.-.' ....
D
~
Iii
I-~e
IIJI-a:
It!U1lii
lii~1-
i~S
u~,..
~lS
!
~
~
i
III
d
g
...
s~~
Ii! 'r
f5 S
...
a:
IIJ
l-
X
IIJ
~3.!J
.
.
WEST COAST DESIGN, INC.
10681 Gulf Blvd., Suite 205
Treasure Island, FL 33706
Phone (727) 368-0491
Fax (727) 368-0589
. January 24, 2003
Mr. Richard M. Alt, P. E.
Southwest Florida Water Management District
7601 Highway 301 North
Tampa, FL 33637-6759 .
Re: Permit Inquiry
657 Court Street
Clearwater, FL
Project No. 03-004
Section 15/29S/15E, Pinellas County
& 'B~ijge~'A~1~~:&~~c
R 'd JA .
R:e' N 2 7 2003
Copy To:
File:
Dear Mr; Alt:
We are forwarding the following items in support of a drainage permit exemption:
· One site plan
· One site survey
Our exemption request is based on a reduction in impervious surface as follows:
BUILDING PAVEMENT GREEN SPACE TOTAL
EXISTING 8,723 S.F./21.0% 27,136 S.F./65.4% '5,614 S.F./13.6% 41.473S.F./100%
PROPOSED 3,200 S.F~/7.7% 24,231 S.F./58.4% 14,042S.F./33.9% 41.473S.F./100%
Please note that the vehicular use area will be reduced.
Please do not hesitate to call us at (727) 368-0491 if you have any questions about
this submittal.
Sincerely I
RECEIVED
JAN 3 1 2003
PLANlllll\lu ), __Lv L:.LUPMENT
.:;t." V I C. lS
CITy 01- vL.:,Ar<WATER
::a:J:~
David C. Littell, President
cc: Mr. Randy Wedding
5 LET';:
MEMBER ST. PETERSBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
. .
WEST COAST DESIGN, INC.
"
J .
10681 Gulf Blvd., Suite 205
Treasure Island, FL 33706
Phone (727) 368-0491
Fax (727) 368-0589
DRAINAGE CALCULATION INDEX AND CERTIFICATION
CONVENIENCE STORE
657 COURT ST.
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
SECTION lS-29S-1SE
PINELLAS COUNTY
PROJECT No. 03-004
DESCRIPTION
PAGE
Calculation Index and Certification
Rational Method Drainage Calculations
Stage-Storage for N. Pond
Stage-Storage for S. Pond
1
2
3
4
RECEIVED
JAN 3: 1: 2003
PLANI\III\1l:i & UEVELOPIVIENT
SERVICES
CITy OF CLEARWATER
OBSOLETE
miLL, I~/~)
Don D. Kreider, P.E. Dale
Fl. Reg. No. 21066
MEMBER ST. PETERSBURG AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
.
.
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS - RATIONAL METHOD
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
DESIGNER
DATE
657 COURT STREET
03-004
DCL
JAN. 29, '03
o 2-YEAR
o 3- YEAR
o 5- YEAR
o 10-YEAR
1 25-YEAR
o 50-YEAR
HIGH EL.=
LOW EL. =
DISTANCE=
26.9
24.5
320
T.O.C.................... 9.0 min.
IF LESS THAN 10 MIN, USE 10
INTENSiTY................ 8.46 in/hr
11!!!~IiII::lr~illl!~IIL!illlll: 1)1 il Iii! l1HII/ '11111:\ Ir 1111 il :li111It; ~1111
EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
OTHER C= 0.20
TOTAL
C= 0.81
AC.
0.8232
0.1289
0.0000
0.9521
PROPOSED
IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS
POND
OTHER C 0.90
TOTAL
C*A=
C=
AC.
0.6297
0.2591
0.0633
0.0000
0.9521
EXISTING RUN-OFF COEF.
INTENSITY
SITE AREA lAC.
0.81
8.46
0.9521
DISCHARGE {Q} =
6.49
I: 11111r11J;1 ;:11 Jj:INI 1/111;;l; I j l!ill;111 Tjl.111~lil!I!)1)1
DURATION INTENSITY
MIN. IN/HR
10 8.46
15 7.25
20 6.44
30 5.35
40 4.64
50 4.12
60 3.72
75 3.25
90 2.90
105 2.62
120 2.39
135 2.20
150 2.04
0.0000 1 ST -1" 0.0000
INFLOW DISCHARGE REQ.STOR
CU.FT. CU.FT. CU.FT.
3462 3892 0
4450 5837 0
5266 7783 0
6571 11675 0
7592 15566 0
8425 19458 0
9122 23349 0
9983 29187 0
10681 35024 0
11260 40861 0
11750 46699 0
12171 52536 0
12539 58373 0
SUMMARY
1ST-1/2"
0.9521 1ST-3/4"
illl:!III,"I'llli:I'i"llillll'IIIIII'iHIII,lillllll'llII~I'IIIIIIIII
jl:!:tl!l~ IHI!!;I!::FII:Hl:!!~IJlilll l!lmll,ljllill;f;l jlf]!l!
REQUIRED ATTENUATION VOLUME
REQUIRED DER RETENTION VOLUME
o
1728
CU FT
CU FT
TOTAL REQUIRED VOLUME
1728
CU FT
OBS
LETE
.
.
l f~lfr.~~n;:"I:~~'n~~;:lf~[~"uv:'liJI'::~1'P"IIT'rm"'lj ;;:'11''::''fI~,;:::~r'1f1ll ITrIT~IT~'i'il'JilrrIT1JffiIIITllml"l ~m'rm,,[I'rl' 1:11\:mII~ftil~IIIT~11:nIUr'iITI:lllllmlll'IIII!i1I~IIIT!I1rITlm;1I!!11~r~lll~ftllflll'[rl~~rU_I~r~~lllllftllm~
~11!!R~l:',*~ilj!r<!JI,lllffn1l~l<ll II !lln'I:>!>\~,!j~~l\lilbll bll}:,111I '\H'I 111111111111!lj, III I II,Itll Ijl! lillWiiil1 \Ij I !III !lllllll I illli IllJj HI!II Illul
~;j,~:r~bJi;,:,'~i Ij tJI,tE'1 i,',l:e~i':l~:j~~t~'111 ~~rf~1r'ti~K~:~i ttlfJ'~:rn,II:W~;::~i~~i~tJ~~I:lil~~~IIII~~~[i:M~~il~~I~~:I ij~~ 1,~ij~IU ~I~ ~ ~jrill~a
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET - N. POND
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCl
DATE 1/29/2003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
908 EL............. 25.00
730 EL.......... 24.50
730 EL........... 24.50
195 EL.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT
23.00 195 0 24.02 558 384
23.04 209 8 24.06 572 406
23.08 223 16 24.10 586 429
23.12 237 25 24.14 600 452
23.16 251 35 24.18 614 476
23.20 265 45 24.22 628 500
23.24 279 56 24.25 642 525
23.27 293 67 24.29 656 551
23.31 307 79 24.33 670 577
23.35 321 91 24.37 684 603
23.39 335 104 24.41 698 631
23.43 349 117 24.45 712 658
23.47 363 131 24.49 726 686
23.51 377 146 24.53 740 715
23.55 391 161 24.57 754 744
23.59 405 176 24.61 768 774
23.63 419 193 24.65 782 805
23.67 433 209 24.69 796 836
23.71 447 226 24.73 810 867
23.75 461 244 24.76 824 899
23.78 475 263 24.80 838 932
23.82 489 281 24.84 852 965
23.86 503 301 24.88 866 999
23.90 517 321 24.92 880 1033
23.94 531 341 24.96 894 1068
23.98 545 363 25.00 908 1103
...................................................S.UMMAI'i'~""""""""""""""""""""""""""
11;; 1; g ~ j n ~ ~~ n; 1; ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~; ~ 1; ~; ~; 1 ~; ~;;;;;;;;;;;;;. .: : ."I!'C:I:;; ~ ~ 1;;;;;;~ l;;;; 1;; ~ l ~; 1;;;;;;; ~ l;; ~ ~ ~! ~ ~! ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
::!ml~~~~~I~~Lu.MW.llllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllliliilb.IIW~ill~w,miiii::
....e..:...::R...............:.........:....:.:.....:.::.:..........:::::::::::::::::::;;;::::;;;:..:..:..:::::...:.:..:......::::;:
...... ...... . ..... .............................. . ...... . .... .......
:iH~11:i:ITill~01~~i~~~~~~iiiiillmiiiiiiiliiiiill:iii~~~:im~m~~illi:im
;;:otAD'\j6'LU'ME;::;:';:::;::::::':;;:";:::':::::':::;::':':";::::':'694':':'c'lhFT"":'
OBSOLETE
t. t~
.
.
PROJECT NAME 657 COURT STREET - S. POND
PROJECT NUMBER 03-004
DESIGNER DCl
DATE 1/29/2003
COMMENTS: STAGE-STORAGE FOR RETENTION POND
1869 EL............. 25.00
1471 EL.......... 24.50
1471 EL........... 24.50
275 El.......... 23.00
AREA VOLUME AREA VOLUME
SQ\FT CU\FT STAGE SQ\FT CU\FT
23.00 275 0 24.02 1088 695
23.04 306 11 24.06 1119 738
23.08 338 24 24.10 1150 782
23.12 369 38 24.14 1181 828
23.16 400 53 24.18 1213 875
23.20 431 69 24.22 1244 923
23.24 463 87 24.25 1275 973
23.27 494 106 24.29 1306 1023
23.31 525 125 24.33 1338 1075
23.35 556 147 24.37 1369 1128
23.39 588 169 24.41 1400 1182
23.43 619 193 24.45 1431 1238
23.47 650 218 24.49 1463 1295
23.51 681 244 24.53 1494 1353
23.55 713 271 24.57 1525 1412
23.59 744 300 24.61 1556 1472
23.63 775 329 24.65 1588 1534
23.67 806 360 24.69 1619 1597
23.71 838 393 24.73 1650 1661
23.75 869 426 24.76 1681 1726
23.78 900 461 24.80 1713 1793
23.82 931 497 24.84 1744 1861
23.86 963 534 24.88 1775 1930
23.90 994 572 24.92 1806 2000
23.94 1025 612 24.96 1838 2071
23.98 1056 653 25.00 1869 2144
:::::::::::::: H: ~: ~:::: ~::::::::::':: ~::::::::: H: SUM MARY:::::::: H:::::: ~::::::::::: ~:::::::::: ~: ~::::::::::
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................
....................................."...........................................................................................
AfuJ~N:UATJ.QN:VQLth~'e.H:::::::::H:::::::!::::::::::::::::(f::!:C.;UNFT:i:;::
~1!:m~m~m~1~~I~m~~M~jllilllii!:,I:ljil~::::I!~:~~~~!.:'l~m~~m:I"li
t6TAL'V6LtJME:::::"::::::::,:::::::~':::::::::::::::::::'::':::::1309'::::C'U\FT':::::
BS
FT"?:
.-... d~ .'" i;,;~~
.
.
~ Wedding
MEMO
RECEIVED
JAN 3- 12003
PLANNING &. Ot.VI:.LOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEAj~WATER
FROM:
RE:
SUBJ:
DATE:
WAYNE WELLS
SENIOR PLANNER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
. VIA HAND DELIVERY
C.RANDOLPH WEDDING FAIA/ASLA
CASE FLD2002-12045- 657 COURT STREET
RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS OF 1/16/03
01129/03
TO:
DEAR MR. WELLS,
THERE FOLLOWS OUR RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS THAT WERE SENT TO US VIA E-
MAIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER OUR MEETING WITH THE DRC ON JAN 16. WE HAVE
RESPONDED IN THE SAME ORDER THAT THE COMMENT APPEARED ON YOUR E-MAIL:
1. ENVIRONMENTAL:
STORMW A TER RENOVATION PLAN IS INCLUDED IN DRAWINGS SUBMITTED
TODA Y . KINDLY NOTE THAT THE REVISED PLAN RESULTS IN ABOUT 7600
ADDITIONAL GREEN SQUARE FOOTAGE WHEN COMPARED TO THE
EXISTING USE.
2. FIRE:
THE RE-DESIGNED BUILDING PROVIDES PROPER SUPERVISORY WINDOWS
FOR GAS PUMP OVERSIGHT.
3. GENERAL ENGINEERING:
SITE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN IS PROVIDED WITH THIS SUBMISSION
4. HARBOR MASTER:
THANK YOU.
5. LAND RESOURCE:
a. RE-DESIGN OF SITE PLAN REMOVES THE 28" OAK.
b. ALL TREES ARE NOW ACCURATELY SHOWN AND LABELED.
c. 35" OAK HAS BEEN PRESERVED IN THE RE-DESIGNEDSITE PLAN.
d. UTILITY PLAN IS PROVIDED. LITTLE OR NO INTERFERENCE WITH THE
OBSOLETE PLANTING AREAS IS ANTICIPATED.
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibargiien
Architects, Ine.
PROF. REG #AA - 0002922
300 First Avenue S., Suite 402 . St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(727) 821-6610 FAX: (727) 894-4216
.
/.
Wedding ~
MEMO
WAYNE WELLS
JANUARY 29,2003
PAGE TWO
e. MOST OF THE TREES WILL BE PRESERVED, HOWEVER REPLACEMENT
AND PAYMENT WILL BE EMPLOYED AS NECESSARY.
f. ALL COMMENTS IN THIS SECTION ARE ADDRESSED IN THIS SUBMISSION.
6. LANDSCAPING:
a. ALL VIEW TRIANGLES ARE SHOWN
, '
b. LANDSCAPE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED ALONG WITH THE OVERALL
LAYOUT.
c. DRAWING SUPPLIED WITH THIS SUBMISSION
7. PARKS AND RECREATION:
THANK YOU.
8. PLANNING:
a. HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 7 AM, TO 11 PM.
b. UTILITY SUBSTATION LIES TO THE NORTH OF THIS SITE.
c. THE PROPERTY AFTER DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE A VALUE OF
$2,300,000 TO $2,600,000.
d. SINCE AN END USER IS NOT DETERMINED AT THIS TIME, SIGNAGE MUST
BE THE SUBJECT OF A SEPARATE PERMIT. SIGNAGE WILL MEET ALL
APPLICABLE CODE RESTRICTIONS.
e. GROSS FLOOR AREAS HA VE BEEN REVISED
f. BUILDING COVERAGE REVISED TO REFLECT ONLY THE STORE SQUARE
FOOTAGE.
g. F.A.R. HAS BEEN REVISED AS REQUESTED.
h. HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES REVISED TO REFLECT THE MID-POINT OF ROOF
STRUCTURES.
as
L E: T. f-:'
, ""8 ~/:""
i. STRUCTURE COLOR WILL BE DRIFTWO G , ANDS AND ACCENTS
WILL BE DARKER SHADES OF THE GENERA ALL COLORS.
.
.
Wedding ~
MEMO
WAYNE WELLS
JAN 29,2003
PAGE THREE
j. NEITHER THE TITLE COMPANY NOR THE CITY CAN PROVIDE THIS
ANSWER. WE DO NOT KNOW, BUT IF DEDICATION IS A REQUIREMENT,
WE WILL COMPLY.
k. LEGAL DESCRIPTION REVISED.
1. NEW SURVEY INSERTED.
m. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE PROVIDED.
n. WE THANK THE STAFF FOR THEIR FORTHRIGHTNESS ON THIS SUBJECT.
o. A NARRATIVE CONCERNING COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWN .
DESIGN GUIDELINES IS SUPPLIED HEREWITH.
p. REDUCED ELEVATIONS SUPPLIED AT THIS TIME.
q. ALL ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME.
9. SOLID WASTE:
a. STANDARD DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED
10. STORMWATER:
a. WHILE THE EXISTING STORM WATER DETENTION IS BEING REVISED AND
INCREASED IN SIZE, THE VOLUME OF STORMW A TER IS ACTUALLY BEING
REDUCED BY THE INSERTION OF MORE GREEN PERVIOUS AREA THAN
THE PRESENT USE. PLAN AND CALCULATIONS PROVIDED WITH THIS
SUBMISSION.
11. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING:
a. TANK LOCATIONS AND TANKER TRAVEL PATH ARE NOW SHOWN ON SITE
PLAN.
BEST REGARDS,
~G
PRESIDENT
OBSOLETE
.
CASE#.,rL ,- ~
DATE RECEIVED: 1..-
RECEIVED BY (staff initia!~):
ATLAS PAGE#: 2JOl9&
ZONING DISTRICT: ..
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: . C~b
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION Including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ''LOS'. r1>
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 11/05/02)
,.., PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT,.., use additional sheets as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)"
THE CEPCOT CORPORATION 1 9 2C~ ~
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS: 14480 62nd STREET NORTH. CLEARWATER, FL 33760
E-MAIL ADDRESS: ;eisch@cepcot.us PHONE NUMBER: 727-531-8913
CELL NUMBER: 813-205-5300 FAA NUMBER: 727-536-8066
PROPERTY OWNER(S): THE CEPCOT CORPORATTON. r.1.F.ARYATF.R TRATN ~TATTON, TNr. ( f Ik I ~
(Must indude ALL owners)
CLEARWATER DEPOT. INC. )
AGENT NAME(S): RANDY WEDDING
MAILING ADDRESS: 300 FIRST AVENUE SOUTH. SlU:_TE._402., ST. PETERSBURG.--FL 33701
E-MAIL ADDRESS: randy(ilwec'lc'lingaTC'hi f"Pl'f"!:1 r-nm PHONE NUMBER: 727-821-6610
CELL NUMBER: FAA NUMBER: 727-894-4216
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 657 COURT STREET, r.1.F.ARYATRR J 1"1. ,:\'HI)R
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A"
Qf not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER S : ~J5/18648/01':\/0070;11)/?Q/lI)/1)44I)O/Ol~/0100'11)/?Q/151544I)O/Ol~/01?O
,,, '2-'f/J,s/1 CO\l4-'IOr~lo 010 ! .. ..
PARCEL SIZE: 0.95A; 41, 341 SQ. FT.
(acres, square feet) -
_. .
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: CONVENIENCE STORE (3200 SQ. FT.) AND FUEL DISPENSARY
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR RETRO FIT FIT OF EXISTING SITE
(indude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
as lE E
. .
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRA~rER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOv.;>L.Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
ClI SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6) COPIES OF DEEDS ATTACHED.
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
ClI Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain .!:!m! each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
The surrounding commercial warehouse, light industrial, office and utility substation uses are all compatible with the
proposed development. The height and bulk of the proposal are less than any of the adjacent uses.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
. Our appraiser has told us that the use proposed is the highest and best use for this specific tract. Keep in mind that
. there is an existing railroad track to the east of the site and that this facility will sit across from a ware~ouse to the east.
What is proposed will represent an upgrade to the properties both to the east and south. No harm will be done to the
. properties to the west or north.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or Working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
There is no immediate reskiential use adjacent to the site. Indeed no residential properties abut or are across from this site. The Pinellas Trail to
the east will be buffered along at least 80% percent of its length along East Street and thus not adversely affected by the proposal Entry to the site
will be from the north and the south from Court Street and Chestnut Street, both being one-way thoroughfares.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Court Street adjoins the site to the north and is one-way to the west. Chestnut Street which adjoins the site to the
. south is one-way east. Thus the North and South ingress and egress creates no turning problems in connection with
. the flow of traffic. Delivery vehicles will be able to pass through the site without backing up into or blocking either
Chestnut or Court Streets.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The site presently is bounded by a railroadllight industrial area to the east. There is a utility substation under
construction to the night and there are commercial properties, banks, office buildings and the like, to the south and
west. What is proposed here is completely consistent with the surrounding environment.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
The design proposed will improve the site visually and there will be adequate buffering from properties to the west
Since no residential properties face the site or exist in the immediate vicinity there is no adverse impact on residenti i
uses. a
Q Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
No variances other than the use itself are being requested in connection with this application. The project's low F.A.R.
is well below the intensity standards set forth in the Clearwater City Codes.
Page 2 of 7 - Aexible Development Applic io~, - p~r
C..,. '-''S.I%..'
gw;
slv. .e... ~f.~~~elopment Project- City of Clearw ater
iIlI"!~l!.~",,, I E:
I .
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
Again, our appraisal indicates that the proposed use is the highest and best for this site. If that be true then the
development will increase and not adversely impact the property values of surrounding sites.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The uses proposed here are permitted in the City of Clearwater and they are not prohibited within the downtown
district zone.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
Surrounding properties (warehouse and railroad tract to the east, light manufacturing to the south, utility building to
the north and offices to the west with no residential immediately adjacent) dictates that the proposal is compatible with I
its surroundi!!gs.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive Infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
The suitability of the site is its availability to the traveling public. Court Street being one-way to the west and Chestnut
Street being one-way to the east (both streets abut this site) makes it particularly suitable for the public convenience.
There are no other known such sites between Chestnut and Court Streets.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
The excessive landscaping and the use of Mediterranean architectural style are intended to create a visually pleasant
and compatible environment and will upgrade the immediate vicinity.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Care has been taken to use a style of architecture with strong reference to traditional historical character of downtown
Clearwater. That design effort creates a form and ambiance that enhances the community character of the site.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
No lot width, setback, height and off-street parking variances have been requested, thus no justification is called for.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared .parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
All code required parking will be contained on-site and there will be no on-street parking resulting from the
development of the site. Loading/unloading will be accomplished entirely within the site.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
The project is specifically designed to meet the design guidelines of the Downtown District and with this design we
believe we have accomplished that purpose.
Page 3 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- Ci~y of Clearwater
S LETE
~. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL R~
IREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
Cl SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
121 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; SEE COVER SHEET.
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
01
-X.
-X.
-X.
.1L
....x...
....x...
....x...
~
-X.
x
N/A
-L
~
~
x
...x..
..x...
:1L
..x....
..x....
..x....
...x..
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index#701};
Location of all landscape material; SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET.
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
m SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form:
x Land area in square feet and acres;
m. Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
.1L Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
.1L Gross floor area devoted to each use;
.1L Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
x Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
.1L Size and species of all landscape material;
.1L Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
.1L Building and structure heights;
x Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
.1L Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
I1J REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
Nh One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
_ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
_ All open space areas;
_ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
_ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
_ Streets and drives (dimensioned);
_ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
_ Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees S" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - Aexible Development APPlicate:>
prehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater
SOLETE
.
G.LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section-4-1102.A)
QI
~
..lL
..x
x
..lL
-X-
Nt!
..x...
..lL
.1L
m
all
a/A
Ii/A
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible)
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
(J STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: REQUEST PAYMENT IN LIEU.
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
(J COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
(J COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
I>> BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
(I REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required SEE RENDERING INCLUDED WITH APPLICATION.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) SEPARATE APPLICATION WILL BE FILED LATER.~-
(J All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
S LETE
Page 5 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
lJ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 17.M
~s n to and subscribed before me this day of
p~..,~ _ AD. 20a..&.,. to me and/or by
~e'~ ,who is Dersonally known. has
produced as
identification.
~t.k~
My commission expires:
OBSOLETE
~~ MY COMMISSION # CC855415 EXPIRES
. . August 7, 2003
BON DID TMNu lWQy FAIN INS~RAN€E; INC
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
The Cepcot Corporation and Clearwater Train Station, Inc.
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
657 Court Street (Clearwater Train Station Restaurant)
651 Court Street (UPARC Thrift Stor,)
640-642 Chestnut Street (Freedom Park)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Flexible Development Application - ComprehenRive Tnfill Rerlevelopmen~ Proje~~ -
City of Clearwater
3. Thatthe undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: C. RRnrlo 1 ph lJprlrling/F.rl A'M1IR~,.nng, RRtl'ti ,.p
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (lIwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoi
STATE
COUNTY OF PINaLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the 11rJ.1, day of
D ()~ 'Jftb~, ~Cd':).. personally appeared. who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. tJ )111 (1".11 ~
My Commission Expires: $'~\-:;"~'f~. Karen S. Mcleod ~At4U LI::i. ~,
~(Ji.': d MY COMMISSION' CCaSS41S EXPIRES f---1 ' Notary Public
~..~.~., August 7, 7003
",'J!'" "",~., BONDED TH~U 1lI0YfAIN INSVRAIKE INC
S:IPfanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive infill application 2002.doc
BS
lETE
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
m Wedding
DEe 1 9 2032
December 19, 2002
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 3375804748
Re: Application for an Automobile Service Station - 657 Court Street
Dear Mr. Wells:
This cover letter is in part a response to your letter to Randy Wedding, dated November
22, 2002. With this letter is an application for the service station and convenience store
at the above address which is in the form of a "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project" under your Flexible Development process.
With the application you will find a check in the sum of $1205.00 payable to the City of
Clearwater along with 12 folded copies of the relative drawings and plans in connection
with the application.
We will pick up with the numbered paragraphs in your November 22"d letter starting with
number 2.
2. Our written justification of the infill project has been submitted and
completed as part of the application.
3. The required visibility triangles are shown as you wished on Sheet A-1.1 of the
attached plans.
4. The original survey is filed with this application. A new survey will be
delivered to you (12 copies) appropriately sealed, prior to the December
26th deadline. The reason for the delay in sending a new survey with the
application is purely and simply a result of suveryors' back-log of work
making it impossible to deliver at this time.
5. A tree survey will be included on the new survey to come (see number 4
above.) When possible existing trees have been retained. See our Sheet
L-1.1.
o
Wedding, Stephenson & Ibargiien
Architects, Inc.
PROF. REG. #AA - 0002922
300 First Avenue 5., Suite 402 . St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
(727) 821-6610 FAX: (727) 894-4216
OLETE
. .
Wedding ~
6. The correct floor area ratio is shown on Sheet A-1.1.
7. The height of the proposed structure is also shown on Sheet A-1.1.
8; Dumpster enclosure details and handicapped parking space details are
shown on the attached drawings.
9. Interior green space requirements exceed 20% of the vehicular use area.
All of that is shown on the attached drawing.
10. Impervious surface ratio will be reduced by the construction of the
Proposed facility. . Exemption from Southwest Florida Water
Management District will be sought. Water quality issues, if any, will be
handled by an underground filtration system.
11. The walkway to the east of the site consists of a portion of the Pinellas
Trail presently in place. The entire width of the right-of-way between the
property and the curb will remain in place as is.
12. Interior green space will be a function of traffic patterns within the site.
They will average more than eight feet in width. See Sheet L-1.1.
13. The angle of the proposed angled parking spaces is 45 degrees.
14. Title search does not confirm that the right-of-way along Chestnut Street
has been dedicated.
15. All shade trees will meet the requirements of this paragraph. See Sheet
L-1.1.
16. All signs will be internal to the site. If any additional signs need to be
permitted they will be applied for as necessary.
17. Discussion with the City of Clearwater's traffic engineer has revealed that
no traffic studies are required in this instance.
18. A unity of title document in recordable form will be furnished covering
the parcels involved.
19. Building elevations are shown on Sheet A-3.1.
We, believe that the application and the supporting drawings together with this letter
meet all of the questions raised in your November 2200 letter. This is an exciting project
and we look forward to working with you and the Planning Department in connection
with it as it goes forward through the planning process.
Yours very truly,
\
~t)rotJb
~~I; Wedding
OBSOLETE
.\
.
DEe 1 9 2002
EXH)BI T
J\
DN/)S IN ANELLAS COUNTY,
_~FLOR'/)A) TO WIT,-
PARCEL I:
All of Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11, Block 13,
MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43, public
records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS right-of-way for
Chestnut Street together with that part of the South 1/2 of
the alley abutting Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11.
PARCEL II:
The West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30 feet of Lot 12,
Block 13, MAGNOLIA PARK,as recorded'in P;I.a,.t Book 3,. page 43,
public records of Pine lIas County, Florida, LESS right-of-way
for Chestnut Street, together with that part of the South 1/2
of the alley abutting the West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East
30 feet of Lot 12.
A-N D
The East 8 inches of Lot 6, all of Lot 7 and the West 30
feet of Lot 8, Block 13, COURT SQUARE, as recorded in
Plat Book 5, page 53, together with the North 1/2 of the
alley abutting the East 8 inches of Lot 6, all of Lot 7
and the West 30 feet of Lot 8, situate and lying in
Pinellas County, Florida.
SOlETE
() IV"';)~
It.- _
t 9~Sb
'T # 96-282147
OC'l.' 1996 5: 30PM
-. P INELLAS COUNTY FLA.
OFF.REC.BK 9493 PG 6p7
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
THOMAS C. NASH, II, Esquire
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
400 Cleveland Street
Post Office Box 1669
Clearwater, Florida 34617
9
OlRECO~IN
ROC .
os ~
INT
FEES
MTF .
~c and between DALTON R. JONES, an unmarr1ed person of the County of
row ~~nellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose
TOTArLL'!! Ad"7
-l7"mailing address is 1064 Glenwood Drive, Dunedin, FL 34698, and
WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE made this 14th
day of October
, 1996, by
CLEARWATER DEPOT, INC., a Florida corporation, of the County of
pinellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the Second Part, whose
mailing address is
DooUmentarY Tax Pd. $ f ~ t e;t:J
$ Intangibl9 Tp,POr
Karleen F De alaka.::;pPlnellas.. COUf.lty-.
By ;' . Deputy; Cl6fJll;
~ That the said
Post Office Box 6025, Clearwater, FL 34618
WIT N E SSE T H:
Party of the First Part, for and in consider-
ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to him in hand paid by the
said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby
..,
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of
the Second Part, and their assigns forever, the following described
land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of
Florida, to-wit:
PARCEL I:
All of Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11, Block 13,
MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43, public
records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS right-of-way for
Chestnut Street together with that part of the South 1/2 of
the alley abutting Lot 10 and the East 27 feet of Lot 11.
PARCEL II:
The West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East 30 feet of Lot 12,
Block 13, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in P;Lat Book 3, page 43,
public records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS right-of-way
for Chestnut Street, together with that part of the South 1/2
of the alley abutting the West 23 feet of Lot 11 and the East
30 feet of Lot 12.
Subject to 1996 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva-
tions and easements of record.
Parcel I.D. No. 15/29/15/54450/013/0100
15/29/15/54450/013/0120
.v
S LETE
'+-'--' <:0
'& ;t>v
-1' rg<tC()-
INST · 86-282146
OCT 14/~6 5:30PM
.
PINELLAS COUNTY FL~65
OFF.REC.BK 9493 PG
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
THOMAS C. NASH, II, Esquire
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
I RECORDING 400 Cleveland Street
CeT Post Office Box 1669
~gE 1::l3E. Clearwater, Florida 34617
R219 ./...I.+!f:-#tJ .
s
iT
iC
WARRANTY DEED
ERT __
- ---..--
ETEFS ----- THIS INDENTURE made this 14th day of october , 1996, by
: --~
OTAL~~nd between DALTON R. JONES, an unmarried person of the County of
~inellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose
mailing address is 1064 Glenwood Drive, Dunedin, FL 34698, and THE
CEPCOT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, of the County of
Pinellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the Second Part, whose
mailing address is Post Office Box 6025, Clearwater, FL 34618
e1/J
Pd$ '12tJ. . ~
lOCumentary Tax . ~ {
. Intangible iax Ii(t
lerk, Plnellas County
Deputy Clerk
That the
WIT N E SSE T H:
3'1
said Party of the First Part, for and in consider-
(arlaen F
ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to him in hand paid by the
said Party of the Second Part, the receipt. whereof is hereby
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of
the Second Part, and their assigns forever, the following described
land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of
Florida, to-wit:
The East 8 inches of Lot 6, all of Lot 7 and the West 30
feet of Lot 8, Block 13, COURT SQUARE, as recorded in
Plat Book 5, page 53, together with the North 1/2 of the
alley abutting the East 8 inches of Lot 6, all of Lot 7
and the West 30 feet of Lot 8, situate and lying in
Pinellas County, Florida.
Subject to 1996 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva-
tions and easements of record.
Parcel I.D. No. 16/2~/15ji864B/b13/0070
And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the
title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
lETE
.
.
PINELLAS CO~NT~GFL~68
OFF.REC.BK 949 '
And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the
title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has
hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above writ-
ten.
Print Name
i?! ~#~QC' 60//~.
'"'''?)
" "")
/I' /,i."
~~G:/I::+F(~)
~ N R. J NES .'
...,' /'
C/
STATE OF FLORIDA'
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before
me, an officer duly authorized to nl.ster and take
acknowledgments, DALTON R. JONES, to me onally k or who has
produced as identl. l.ca and who did
take an oath, and known to me to be the individual(s) described in
and who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged
before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein
expressed.
WITNESS my hand~nd official
and State, this ~ day of
No~ary ublic T~ A J . 1 ~
Prl.nt Name ~qJ I~~
My Commission Expires:
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL
THOMAS CHARLES NASH II
NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO CC424705
MY COMMISSION EXP IAN 41999
as
LETE
7C073B82 PAD 10-14-1996 17: 20: 00
01 OED-CLEARWATER DEPOT INC
RECORDING 1
DOC STAMP - DR21.9 3
$10,50
$Cr'r,('l 01 I
-2-
TOTAL:
CHECK AMT~ TENDERED:
CHAN(iE:
$91f"SD
$976.50
$.00
-'
'. .
SALES VERIFICATION SURVEY
QI
54
55
17-APR-95
Transaction dated: 1 0 /11 I 94
16 / 2~ / 1S / 18648 / 013 / 0090
Official Record: !;3pok 8939
Page 1468
COURT SQUARE
BlK 13, lOT 9 & E 20FT OF
PORPOISE, POOL & PATIO INC
POBOX 6025
CLEARWATER I FL 34618
L.OT 8
655
COURT ST
Sale Price
(from Official Records): $
$8~/OOO
Daytime phone number.
(';/3) LtJ3J -gq 1.3
1,
This property is:
Single Family Home
Vacant Land
Other, Explain
v
Condominium
Commercial
Mobile Home
2.
Is the above sale price the amount you paid for this property?
· If "No", how much was'paid for this property? $
~
Yes
_No.
3.
What was the condition of the property at the time of purchase?
,.. .',. Good Average ~ Fair
Poor
DEe 1 9
4. Which of the following was included in the sale price (check all that apply);
refrigerator
boat slip
parking space
fully furnished
drapes washer, dryer
If checked, estimate current market value: $
If checked, estimate current market value: $
If checked, estimate current market value: $
5.
Was a real estate agent involved in the sale?
Yes
v
No
6.
Do you feel the seller was motivated to sell because ota death in the family, foreclosure,
bankmptcy or divorce? Yes. No. If "Yes", which?
AI/~
7.
Were special incentives, such as free trips or ma!ptenance, offered or accepted to
complete this sale? Yes. V No · If "Yes", which?
8.
Was this a sale between relatives?
Was this a sale between related businesses?
Yes
Yes
V No
No
9.
Type of financing:
v
FHA / VA
Cash
Conventional
Seller Participation
Assumption
Other
1 st Mortgage / Loan Amount $
Rate %
Term / Years
Mortgage Information Not Applicable
2nd Mortgage / Loan'Amount $ Term / Years
Rate % _ Mortgage Information Not Applicable
OBSOLE E~ PLEASE TURN SHEET OVER
,. ..... TO READ ACCOMPANYING LETTEr
.
.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Sandra B. Mortham
Secretary of State
August 7, 1998
DEe 1 9
CSC
ABBY
TALLAHASSEE,FL
Re: Document Number P96000065681
The Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of CLEARWATER
DEPOT, INC. which changed its name to CLEARWATER TRAIN STATION,
INC., a Florida corporation, were filed on August 6, 1998.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please telephone (850)
487 -6050, the Amendment Filing Section.
Teresa Brown
Corporate Specialist
Division of Corporations
Letter Number: 098A00041253
Account number: 072100000032
Account charged: 35.00
BSOLETE
Division of Corporations - P.O. BOX 6327 -Tallahassee, Florida 32314
1--
)
..
...
It
..
..
I
i
I
.0.
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I <().
I
I
I
".
I
~ rn~~
N't"ld 3dYJSONY, i......
-I
Inzo ........ \
YOIIlO1J 'tl31 YMllY31J
13~lS 1~~ L99
~lS 3:lN3IN3ANO~
.l3~lS ll:1OO~
I
i e
i
\!II
~I
~
~I
e e e e
i!
...1
'"
III
.Ja
III:
+ ~ ) t
I I
II SY~ _____________L_~
.~--------------------:lIIW3AY 1 ,. ---- 1-+-I-t-t+...++H-t-+j
t-J--J-+ 1-t-1--H-H -1-+ ++ t-t-I-+-I-H -I-+-I-t- t +1-+++-+ - I
i d d
I
I
I
I
I I
I I I
~ ~
fub----
---,.. ...
;...19
__u_..
:.c. iI .
-------------'1
I
r---
I
--------
BSOLETE
~ ~
l
..
...
I
..
.
i
..
.
X
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
z
~
oJ
Q,
1&I
Q,
C
U
II)
o
z
c
oJ
'01 ~~i~
)O~ _.._."
-0: -..,..
~. ..--..-
.M_.....-&-.
. .----
-0
Y011lO1" 'tl31_313
~
NY'ld 3.lIS
rn~
! .
i~
<(
13~lS l~~ l~9
~lS 3JN3IN3ANO~
13~lS l~
I '; 5i; i
:i.!. .II!. .rl I
: "'I 5!1 II ...
'I:.!:"!'- f.-: ~
Ilil .'if ~i t!" m.
U~ ~ _L~d"! ~ '-I
~~. '.~c I~~ "' .~
. .IIi i'i
.~"1 !Pi SoH 1'1 r.....18
~ I". '!I I !s-;' "_1
. .~. IPi ~ I I ~ .11 ~:-d
.. !..~ ~I!h' U · ... id
.. II!: .~I..it f f ~ m ,,:j
N~ .=. I~ .' i i i ...
.~.' 51 I~ .i..;m
ri frlJ ii!! .. i II ~ I
!I
".
:. i
,~ I
I:
il ~ !
Xd ~
;~i J
"
) J. \t. ) '" l
I I
I I
I ~ I
'..-- J ~- ~y 1SY1 ____________J__~
I
I
-&,
t
!
!
i
'fr
i
I
..
III
II!
..
...
i
u
I
,0.
· f
.. I "fib- _.L--
----eo-a !"
...;oft... ~
ad. i"
('I')
....
z.
~,
....'
a.'
111'-
::;~
In II
'"
r-----------
S LETE
r---
OBSOLETE
.
,
Line Items:
Case No
1
Receipt #: 1200200000000017983
Date: 12/20/2002
12/20/2002
12:22:25PM
Description
Tran Code
Revenue Account No
Amount Paid
FLD2002-12045
Payments:
Method
04
Flexible Connnercial
010-341262
1,205.00
51,205.00
Line Item Total:
How Received
Check
i;;-E":;;~~
:/~{::.i-:;""'i:?'1
. .<:I.w,.~_..d!!:
i,:".
CK. NO.
DAlE
Payer
Bank No
Account No
Confirm No
Amount Paid
1,205.
51,205.00
PINCH A PENNY INC
2215
In Person
Payment Total:
~;~T0~,:
k'., j..,
w: ,-,;.'
of.-,",''''''-''''''
~J.'r~~r
f'\ s:71
fj,,'J"-'. t~"..
'i~."';\',_\ -',
:~'~':\'a .~
d-d-l'5
1~~O( b"d- (t-JO
.
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
cReceipltpt
Page I ofl