The URL can be used to link to this page

APP2003-00003 . ... ..... .. . . . .." . '. . . PI aming Department ."~" ..... ..' ..... 100SouthMyrtleAvenue "" . .' . '.. . . . Clearwater, Florida 33756 :~. '~'. . . ater. Telephone: 727-562-4567 ~'" ..' ..' ..... . '.'. .. .: .... Fax: 727-562-4576 :,~~~ CASE #: M.(' 1....0 t) ~ - t) () 00 ') DATE RECEIVED-:--JJr~.ti.~-==- RECEIVED BY (staff inittiS): __;l~~__ ~ SUBMIT ORIGiNAl SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION ~ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $100..,00__ APPEAL APPLICATION Lwd On" ami u,\.d Two R"vi"ws (R"viS<'u 03/29/0 I) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLlCA TIONINOTICE OF APPEAL (Code Section 4-502.A & B) An appeal of a level one approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval within seven days ri the date the development order is issued. The filing of an applicationl notice of appeal shaff stay the etreet of the decision pending the final daermimtion ofthe case. All application/notice of appeal of appeal of any decision of the city, as provided in Section 4-501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be flied with the city clerk in a form specified by the community development coordnator identifying with specificity the basis for the appeal and a=mpanied by a fee as reqlired by Sedion 4-202.E. The filing of an application! notice cf appeal shall stay the effeet of the decisioo pending the final determinatioo of the case. A. APPELLANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPELLANT NAME _ M~y~~\_-.L3k~~_~~ ______________________________ MAILING ADDRESS: lfl_-11~ Q__T ~,,~J2~ .ye___tk~ ~~~___+!IJ.7) 1_______________ PHONE NUMBER: 7_~ L_l~.J::_~ 70________ FAX NUMBER: 7 ~ 1__113-=~2iS------------ AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: ________________ FAX NUMBER: B. APPEAL INFORMATION CHECK THE SPEClRC APPEAl: Aooeals to the Communitv Develooment Board (J Orders, requirements, decisions or determinatioos made by an administrative offIcial in the administration of the development coc1e, except (or eriorcemel1t actions. o Administrative interpretations of the development code ~ Level One (Flexible and Minimum Standard) approval decisions (J Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions ofthis Code ADDRESS OF SUBJECT APPEAl (if applicable): 2 '3 s.:t--~~- ~~{e.~ _C; \--~ 1~_':jJ e.s t_______ SPECIFIC CASE NUfIII3ERTO BE APPEAlED (if applicable): f LS 2DO'~ - 0'8 O':1~ DATE OF DECISION: -L~d~~-~ ~ ______ Aooeals to a hearina aficer (J Decisioos of the community development board regarding level two approvals (J Decisions o(the community development board regarding level one approvals (J OTHER (as allowed by Code) _________ Page 1 of 2 - Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews)- City of Clearwater I . . . ..... ..' ... . . C. BASJS OF APPEAl: Explain in detail the basis for the appeal. Use additional sheets if necessary. _ B~~_~-:- ~__illd v~_~_i2lLOw~~____________________________ _J1J~- ~h~ IL_?~~->_~_~Y-~~; ~_~_J:l^~,-~s1\+_u.i_~~~!y__.Y~~ e__~&-1~~ It _____J..!_~~_i~t~~.r.-hk~-~I..-~~ll~-L~___{L~~--~ ~~4--~~__Py-o~ SS_J-____-;_ _~}jf-vul{ cl)-- ~~_~r\ ~ le__1-~~__ ~_Q~ ~i~__~~i_JL~__& 1!1~ ~ Ii edL ~ _~~~"\ v Js +e & V\ 0 ~.\ -\is e. \f Q. y i ~t2... -i--------------------------------- _j)J ~_~1~_t__~_~L~& _~--:-_~~l~h__ ~f--~ ~--~ ~-l~-ILrQ~-.b (_cJi~'; ---1:)-i~-- ~LQ1l_~_ ~ __~ __~ t__~'f_t~~~-~--'-~ t4 s +~ 1L~__~ et~__ --__ e-_'lL4..e:^~_t---------------------------_---------------------_________ _51llt e _~~-~(.~-L~ to_~ .~ -t-j-dLl,(~/'~ ifkO..'tav -1-- ~ ~t__~~s;C'V\aJ.,,\-e ~____ _0-1 ~ {: _~~~_--'~ _~M. ,r~~.l+e~_~1-i<. ~_~~~~_ ~~_~b-i~~'~ s _ ~i _'(t~~ 1+5 ___j ll_L\ __'!.i "J~\~__~"- _~ e.~.L~~__~ ~_~~~_~~~~-~y \~" ~ ~__~~__ _.J1J1tL_~~1 ~ ~_ Lte _~t_MJ.lLL.~L~__~A ~0_e.__~~C- ~ L___________________ D. SIGNATURE: Il ~n~n' -L~ - -- ---------- Signature of property o\l\Kler or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF P1NELLAS J Ffh ~to apt! subscribed before me this ~_ day cf _ ~a:.t:--, A.D. 20~ 25 to me and/or by -J.../..iC 11...~~~ who is personally known _has produced LP as ~'~iL ()-I~p_ Notary public, My commission expires: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. \\MS2tPDSlPfanning DeparlmenMpplication Foons'deve/opment reviewVlppeaJ Application. doG ~\\\\\lIItIl"'111 ~,,\\ ~etine A k; IIII';. ~ r,~ ......~ e"" ~ -;::. v.. IS51 '. .,0. ~ $ ,"o~\A 04'^,~',:;(:) ~ ~ .. ~G o,\\,'oer 10 yA?... ~ _ . ~ ~v ~_~ ~ . _ S*: ~C)tj ~-'f(\~ ~ ~.: . (}'ten. :: -:: ..... :*: := 5 ~ #DD054679 : ~ \~... ..~~ ~~'lJ.oy~tlro .'9:'~ ~ ... ...."i~... Cj~' ~I! ~{t. ........,,'( <.;\;~~ ~/" C, STA1t. v ,\....... ;t1"'"ItlIIl'\\\~ Page 2 r::J 2 - Appeal Application (level One and level Two Reviews)- aty of Clearwater CL WCoverSheet . . NOV 0 4 2003 ~i~) , , APP2003-00003 2959 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W Date Received: 11/04/2003 FINSTADtt AMBRYN ZONING DISTRICT: LDR LAND USE: RS ATLAS PAGE: 200B PAl D CK. NO. 1) t2- DATE II D 4/ 0 ~ tJ 00 It) . . ~I.O-~ ~"~\ALOF r/(t~ l~ ~..~~~~ ..~e:l(;II/~' ~.~ ~c:':t~-~~~~. ,,",c::.~ =- ,S)... ~~}.... ~~ ~~~..~{~,~ .~....,.)1TE~',1..l\ ~LL~ CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 March 19,2004 Mr. Michael Markham Ms. Stefanie Markham 2960 Talon Drive Clearwater, Florida 33761 RE: Development Order regarding case APP2003-00003 at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Dear Mr. and Mrs. Markham: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On March 16,2004, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your appeal application of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (Case No. FLS2003-08038), under the appeal provisions of Section 4-501 of the Community Development Code. The Community Development Board denied the appeal application because the appellant did not show compliance with all of the following criteria: 1) The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of the Community Development Code; and 2) That the decision will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Community Development Code; and 3) Will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. The decision of the Community Development Coordinator under Case No. FLS2003-08038 was confirmed by a majority of the members of the CDB. Please be aware that an appeal of the CDB decision must be initiated within 14 days of the date of the decision by the Board. The appeal period for your case will expire on March 30, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Lisa Fierce, Assistant Planning Director, at 727-562-4561. CP Cc: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad \ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next CDBIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad Appeal - DeniedlEagle Estates Circle W 2959 Development Order. doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYf HMIILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . ~~.1C~~ .9.f\~~LoF TN~~ ~~;iP~~~ ~~td I/!/Wi'- ~, ~.~ ~-(\-~ C::C.!'l lI(__~=- ,.......~ ...!...oil.... =- .~;' ...~. : ,. -==--- ~"'. ~~~- ~ "".,$ ~":'~~i~~i\~ ~~~TE~,.,....~t . ~"-~LI ' CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW February 12, 2004 Mr. Michael Markham Mrs. Stefanie Markham 2960 Talon Drive Clearwater, Florida 33761 Re: APP2003-00003, 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Dear Mr. and Mrs. Markham: You have filed an appeal (Case No. APP2003-00003) of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development), that approved an application by Jeffrey and Arnbryn Finstad to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003- 08038) at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West. The Community Development Board (CDB) at their meeting on December 16,2003, tabled this appeal case to no later than March 16,2004. Please be advised that Case No. APP2003-00003 has been placed on the CDB agenda for public hearing on March 16, 2004. The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, tJ"j "'- /"I. W dP.. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Jeffrey and Arnbryn Finstad \\MS5cIPDS\Planning Department\C D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next CDB\Eagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad Appeal\CDB letter 2.J2.04.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HII3IlARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PIANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 December 26, 2003 Mr. Jeffrey Finstad Mrs. Ambryn Finstad 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Clearwater, Florida 33761 Re: APP2003-00003, 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Dear Mr. and Mrs. Finstad: The Community Development Board (CDB) considered Case No. APP2003-00003 at their meeting on December 16, 2003, which is an appeal filed by Michael and Stefanie Markham of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved your application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038). The appeal stays (places on hold) the approval of the Flexible Standard Development case until the Community Development Board decides the appeal case, The CDB continued this appeal case to a date no later than their March 16, 2004, meeting. The CDB encouraged resolution of the setback issue through the homeowners' association prior to the March 16,2004, meeting of the CDB. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, 6!::r-w::': Al~~ Senior Planner Cc: Michael and Stefanie Markham \IMS5c\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases \ Up for the next CDBIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad AppeallLeller ofCDB Continuance 12.26.03.doc BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bll.l.]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PIANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW November 6, 2003 Mr. Jeffrey Finstad Mrs. J\nnbrynFinstad 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Clearwater, Florida 33761 Re: APP2003-00003, 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Dear Mr. and Mrs. Finstad: An appeal has been filed (Case No. APP2003-00003) by Michael and Stefanie Markham of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved your application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003- 08038). The appeal stays (places on hold) the approval of the Flexible Standard Development case until the Community Development Board decides the appeal case. The appeal case has been scheduled for the December 16, 2003, meeting of the Community Development Board. The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. I am sending to you a copy of the appeal that was filed for your information and use. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, ~:Z~ :Jl~,~~ Senior Planner Cc: Michael and Stefanie Markham (no attachment) Attachment \IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next CDBlEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR) - ApprovedlLetter re APP2003-00003 & CDB date 11.6.03.doc I L BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON: COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . . ~~LOF TN~ .~~~ ~~\ ~ ~~ ~~,-==- ~, ~~4J~~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 29,2003 Mr. Jeffrey Finstad Mrs. Ambryn Finstad 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Clearwater, Florida 33761 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-08038 at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Dear Mr. and Mrs. Finstad: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202,E of the Community Development Code. On September 18, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provision of Section 2-103.B. The proposal includes a 1,528 square-foot, two-story addition to an existing single-family residence. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-103.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the property survey be updated prior to the submission for building permits to less out the abutting dedicated rights-of-way; 2. That an oversized roof gutter and drain spout, to direct house and garage roof drainage to Eagle Estates Circle South (not the rear of the lot), be shown on building plans and be installed prior to the issuance of a Final Inspection; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR'COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMl<f,lVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . October 29,2003 Finstad - Page Two 3, That, to ensure stormwater runoff will not create adverse impacts on the abutting properties, existing and proposed land elevations be submitted for review as part of the permitting process for the addition; 4. That, should the existing hedge along the east property line be damaged or destroyed during construction to the extent of reducing the opacity of the hedge by more than 25 percent, a six- foot high solid fence be installed and maintained along the east property line for privacy purposes (maximum of three feet high within the 25-foot front setback area); and 5. That the final design of the building, including window banding, be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted and the color of the dwelling be consistent throughout. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with above five conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received August 19, 2003. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (October 29, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal may be initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on November 4,2003 (seven days from date of Development Order). . October 29,2003 Finstad - Page Three . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M, Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. * Make Us Your Favorite! Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director CC: Michael and Stefanie Markham John and Karen Sullivan I\MS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard Flexll!ending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagh~i2959 Development Order.doc . e DRC Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Time: Applicant: Address: September 18. 2003 FLS2003-08038 10:00 am Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrey and Ambrvn Finstad 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FILE COpy GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provision of Section 2-103 .B. EXISTING ZONING: Low Density Residential (LDR). EXISTING LAND USE: Residential Suburban Classification (RS). PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Single-family residential Single-family residential ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES: North: West: East: South: Single-family residential Single-family residential Single-family residential Single-family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: The OA23-acre site is located on the east side of Eagle Estates Circle West, approximately 400 feet south of Eagle Estates Circle North. The site is zoned LDR, Low Density Residential District and is located within a single-family residential subdivision. The site is a comer lot and contains an existing 2,815 square-foot, single-story, single-family dwelling, including a two-car garage. The site has an existing, two-car wide driveway on Eagle Estates Circle South, which also provides access to a circular driveway on the south side of the house. The lot is 93.5 feet by 140 feet (approximately 13,040 square feet), which is nonconforming to current lot width and area standards. When originally platted, the lot included the private street rights-of-way of Eagle Estates Circle West and Eagle Estates Circle South. These streets were dedicated to the City of Clearwater a number of years ago as public rights-of-way. The survey submitted shows the property lines extending to the centerline of the rights-of-way, which should be updated to less out the rights-of-way. The Community Development Code provides for comer lots to have two front setbacks (abutting street rights-of-way) and the other "sides" to be side setbacks (no rear setback). This subdivision includes single and two-story dwellings, all with at least a two-car garage, but many with three-car garages. The proposal includes constructing a 1,528 square-foot, two-story addition, including a third car garage (with a driveway extension) in association with the existing single-family dwelling on the east side of the house. The second floor of the addition is intended for two bedrooms, an exercise area and a media room. The house and driveway are presently set back 20 feet from the east property line. The applicant proposes the addition at a side setback from the east property line of 10 feet. The Code requires a minimum 15 feet side setback. The applicant has submitted surveys from various lots within this subdivision verifying side setbacks between 10 and 15 feet. The applicants' own house is set back 10.5 feet from the north property line. When determining the community character regarding setbacks, \ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page I of 6 . e Planning staff has relied upon verification of similar setbacks within the neighborhood, and not in a particular direction. Two homeowners within this subdivision have submitted letters of objection to the proposal, including the property owner directly to the east of the subject lot, with the following issues: 1. Conformance with the subdivision deed restrictions - The City does not enforce deed restrictions, which may be more restrictive than City Codes. The applicant will also need to obtain approval of the proposal from the homeowner's association. 2. Determination of required setback - As stated above, this is a comer lot, which requires compliance with front setbacks abutting street rights-of-way and side setbacks on the other "sides" (in this particular case). The Code does not require a rear setback for a comer lot. 3. Dwelling size and height - So long as the dwelling meets the required setbacks (or obtains variances to build closer to property lines), building height and the impervious surface ratio, a property owner may build as large a dwelling as possible. The Code does not set a size restriction. The maximum building height in the LDR District is 30 feet, measured for a pitched roof to the mid-point of the roof. In this case, the proposed height is 26 feet. 4. Second floor windows - The property owner to the east is concerned with second floor windows facing his property and the loss of privacy, wherein he has suggested frosting the windows. Most zoning codes generally provide for two-story single-family dwellings and do not require fencing for the first floor (usually a maximum six-foot high fence may be installed by property owners along side and rear property lines for privacy, security or to protect pools) nor frosting of windows for second floor windows. From a general and fire safety standpoint, windows should be viewable (allowing views to the outside or from the outside in, except for any window treatments such as drapes), except for bathroom windows. The property owner to the east is also concerned that the windows be framed similar to existing windows. Based on photographs of the existing dwelling and proposed building elevations, proposed windows will be banded similar to existing windows. 5. Impervious surface ratio (ISR) - Calculation of the ISR, not including the abutting rights-of-way, indicates an existing ISR of 0.52 and a proposed ISR of 0.56, still below the maximum of 0.60. 6. Drainage - The property owner to the east is concerned with water runoff onto his property due to the proposal to build within 10 feet of the common property line. Stormwater Engineering has recommended inclusion of a condition to require an oversized roof gutter and drain spout for the house and garage roof to direct roof drainage to Eagle Estates Circle South and not the rear of the lot. To ensure stormwater runoff will not create adverse impacts on the abutting properties, existing and proposed land elevations should be submitted for review as part of the permitting process. 7. Construction fencing - For safety concerns, the property owner to the east desires a construction fence to minimize the possibility of an attractive nuisance to his children. The Building Code requires construction sites to be maintained in a safe condition. If in the determination of the Building Inspector the site is not safe, the inspector could require safety measures be implemented. 8. Construction cost - Construction costs are a market-based issue. For plan examination and permitting fees, costs are based on the value of the project. 9. Existing hedge along the east property line - There is an existing hedge of at least six feet in height along the east property line on the subject parcel. The property owner to the east, as well as the subject property owner, desire privacy. The property owner to the east also is concerned with car lights shining into their yard and odors from a trash container (most likely to be stored on the east side of the dwelling, much as it is today). Section 3-201.D.l requires trash containers and outdoor mechanical equipment to be screened, which may accomplished with fencing or hedging. There is no provision under City Code to require the installation of any hedge or fence for privacy in a single-family subdivision, except potentially along the outside perimeter of a subdivision. The applicant desires to retain the existing hedge. From a fencing standpoint, the maximum height of a fence or wall along is six feet. Should the existing hedge be damaged or destroyed during construction reducing the opacity of the hedge by more than 25 percent, then a six-foot high solid fence should be installed and maintained along the east property line for privacy purposes (maximum of three feet high within the 25-foot front setback area). 10. Construction timing - The property owner to the east is concerned with the length of time construction could take, the hours of the day for construction and whether there would be a port~a-let and a I\MS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-18-03 DRC\Eagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report.doc- Page 2 oj 6 . . construction dumpster. Generally, for a project as proposed, construction should take no more than six months. City Code restricts the hours of the day and the days of the week for construction to 7 am to 6 pm, Monday through Saturday. Most likely, a port-a-let will be provided for construction workers and there will be a construction dumpster. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3- 913) and Residential Infill Project criteria (Section 2-103.B) have been met. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT PERMITTED MAXIMUM One dwelling unit One dwelling One dwelling unit Yes DENSITY unit IMPERVIOUS 0.60 0.52 0.56 Yes SURFACE RATIO (ISR) LOT AREA 20,000 square feet 13,040 square 13,040 square Yes* (minimum) feet feet LOT WIDTH 100 feet 93.5 feet 93.5 feet Yes* (minimum) FRONT West: 25 feet West: 30 feet West: 30 feet Yes SETBACK** South: 25 feet South: 30 feet South: 30 feet REAR SETBACK N/A (Comer lot) N/A N/A N/A SIDE SETBACK East: 15 feet East: 20 feet East: 10 feet Yes North: 15 feet North: 10.5 feet North: 10.5 feet HEIGHT 30 feet 16.75 feet 26 feet Yes (maximum) PARKING Two spaces/unit Six spaces (two Eight spaces Yes SPACES in garage; four (three in garage; in driveway) five in driveway) *Lots in this subdivision originally included half of the abutting 50-foot wide private right-of-way, which was dedicated a number of years ago to the City of Clearwater. This lot is now a nonconforming lot. **Front setbacks are measured from the front property line and do not include any of the dedicated right-of-way. I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and PendingI09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page 3 of 6 . . FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-103.B): 1. Development or redevelopment of the parcel IS impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards; Consistent Inconsistent [X] [ ] 2. Development of the parcel as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; [X] [ ] 3. Uses within the residential infill project are permitted in the district; [X] [ ] 4. Uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; [X] [ ] 5. Development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the inunediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; [X] [ ] 6. Design of the residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the conununity character of the inunediate vicinity; [X] [ ] 7. Flexibility in lot width, setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified. [X] [ ] \\MS5clPDSIPlanning Department\C D BIStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-18-03 DRC\Eagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report.doc- Page 4 0[6 . . GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent [X] [ ] 1. Development of the land will be 10 harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. [X] [ ] 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. [X] [ ] 4. Development IS designed to minimize traffic congestion. [X] [ ] 5. Development IS consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. [X] [ ] 6. Design of the proposed development nnmnnzes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. [X] [ ] I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and PendingI09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR}IEagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page 5 of 6 . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 18, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development application to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B for the site at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-103.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the property survey be updated prior to the submission for building pennits to less out the abutting dedicated rights-of-way; 2. That an oversized roof gutter and drain spout, to direct house and garage roof drainage to Eagle Estates Circle South (not the rear of the lot), be shown on building plans and be installed prior to the issuance of a Final Inspection; 3. That, to ensure stormwater runoff will not create adverse impacts on the abutting properties, existing and proposed land elevations be submitted for review as part of the pennitting process for the addition; 4. That, should the existing hedge along the east property line be damaged or destroyed during construction to the extent of reducing the opacity of the hedge by more than 25 percent, a six-foot high solid fence be installed and maintained along the east property line for privacy purposes (maximum of three feet high within the 25-foot front setback area); and 5. That the final design of the building, including window banding, be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted and the color of the dwelling be consistent throughout. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: NL- ft. &z Wells, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Application I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard FlexlPending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)\Eagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page 60f6 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER 1"-:, NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HE#f'1Nt! ~ The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tue~ <<;;h 16, 2004, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine:. Those cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neie:hborine: propertv owners. etc. will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved bv a sine:le vote at the bee:innine: of the meetine:. 1. (cont. from 12/16/03) Michael & Stefanie Markham are requesting an appeal of the decision ofa Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038). (Proposed Use: A 1,528 square-foot, two-story addition, including a third car garage (with a driveway extension) in association with an existing single-family dwelling) (Owners: Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad) at 2959 Eae:le Estates Cir. W., Eagle Estates, Lot 38. APP2003-00003 2. Top Flie:ht Enterprises. Inc & 1925 Ede:ewater Drive. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction in the side (east) setback ffi-1-&mnydale Drive from 10 feet to 5.85 feet (to pavement) and, an increase of building height from 35 feet to 75 feet from base flood elevation of 13 feet MSL (with height calculated to the midpoint of the roof slope) to construct 77 multi-family residential (attached) units, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached multi-family residential units) at 1919 & 1925 Ede:ewater Dr. & 1010. 1012 & 1020 Sunset Point Rd., Sunnydale Sub, Lots 1,2 and W 34 ft of Lot 3; Sunset Point and Replat Lots 2 & 3; Blk A, the E 3 ft of Lot 4, Lot 5,6, 7, together with the W 15 ft of Lot 8. FLD2003-09050 3. Massoud & Malouse Dabiri are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. (Proposed Use: Office building) at 117 McMullen Booth Rd., Crystal Heights Sub, Lots 1 & 2. FLD2003-11061 4. Belle Aqua Villas. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for six slips totaling 720 square feet, with each dock measuring 60 feet in length from the seawall, in conjunction with a six-unit townhome development) at 125 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No. 2, Lots 7 & 8. FLD2003-11062 5. Belle Aqua Villas. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for six slips totaling 720 square feet, with each dock measuring 60 feet in length from the seawall, in conjunction with a six-unit townhome development) at 116 & 120 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 53 & 54. FLD2003-11063 6. ENT A Investments. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the expansion of a medical clinic with reductions to the front (east along South Fort Harrison Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing building), from 25 feet to three feet (to existing pavement) and from 25 feet to 15 feet (to proposed pavement), reductions to the front (north along "B" Street) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing building) and from 25 feet to seven feet (to proposed dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (south along "C" Street) from 25 feet to two feet (to existing pavement) and reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to existing building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and to permit reductions to the landscape buffer along the front (east along South Fort Harrison Avenue) property line from 15 feet to 10 feet (to existing building) and from 15 feet to three feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the front (north along "B" Street) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the front (south along "c" Street) from 10 feet to two feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G (Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing 3,096 square-foot medical clinic through the renovation of an existing 2,357 square-foot building for administrative purposes) at 1320 Ft. Harrison Ave., Belleair, Blk 24, Lot 1-2 & vac alley on W, Lots 3,4 & 5 & E 1/2 ofvac alley. FLD2003-12066 . . 7. IIhan Bih!Utav (Pat Sheppard) is requesting a flexible development approval to permit construction of 2 medical clinic offices with building A totaling 7,985 sq ft and building B totaling 8,488 sq ft along with reductions to the front (southeast) setback along Lakeview Rd from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) under the provision of Section 2-1004.C. (Proposed Use: 2 medical clinic offices totaling 16,473 sq ft) at 720 Lakeview Rd., Sec. 21-29-15, M&B 14.21. FLD2003-12067 8. Marlee A. Winner is requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction to lot size from 5,000 sq ft to 4,040 sq ft, a reduction in the side (south) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the front (west) setback to 3 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the side (north) setback to .9 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the rear (east) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in required parking from 15 spaces per 1,000 sq ft to zero for a restaurant and to permit 3 dwelling units above as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Restaurant and 3 residential units) at 395 Mandalav Ave., Barbour-Morrow Sub., Elk A, par t of Lot 21 & all of Lot 22. FLD2003-12070 9. Valhalla Properties / John Rich are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a medical clinic with reductions to parking from 42 spaces to 29 spaces, a reduction of the front setback from 25 feet to 17 feet (to building), a reduction in the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to the dumpster enclosure), a reduction in the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), and a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 14 feet (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line (no continuous hedge along property perimeter provided), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Change of use from an existing 8,072 square foot social center building to a medical clinic) at 407 N. Belcher Rd., Sec. 07-29-16, M&B 33.11. FLD2004-02007 10. Josee Goudreault is requesting an appeal of a Level One application (Flexible Standard Development case FLS2003- 12066) that requires the building be repainted a neutral color, under the provisions of Section 4-501. (Proposed Use: An existing building that has been painted light purple [main portion of the exterior of a building] and dark purple [base of the building and trim]) at 24 N. Ft. Harrison Ave., Earl & Tate's Sub., N 43 ft of Lots 12 & 13. APP2004-00001 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Connnunity Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that slbe is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and reconnnendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m and 4:30 p.m, weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk Lisa Fierce Planning Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. . . YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN mIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 02129/04 . . . Page 1 of1 Wells, Wayne From: Garymn@aol.com Sent: Monday, March 15,200410:35 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: gnamm@tampabaypartners.com.karenbremer@outback.com Subject: Finstad/Markham-TIME SENSITIVE - Please open immediately Dear Wayne: Attached please find an important letter from the Homeowners Association regarding the Finstad/Markham matter --- APP2003-00003 schedule for Tuesday, March 16, 2004. Please add this letter to the record for today's proceeding and please share with all Board members PRIOR to today's discussion on this matter. It speaks for itself! Any questions? Please call Gary Namm, Vice-President 727-644-8999. Wayne, thank you on behalf of our neighborhood. Gary Namm Eagle Estates Homeowners Association garymn@aol.com 727 -644-8999 3/1612004 . . . Eagle Estates Homeowners Association 2932 Eagle Estate Circle North Clearwater, FL 33761 March 15,2004 Dear City of Clearwater Officials: VIA E-MAIL (Mr. Wayne Wells) TIME SENSITIVE This letter from the elected Board members of the Eagle Estates Homeowners Association will clearly state that the applicants for this variance request, Mr.and Mrs. Jeff Finstad, 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West, have never provided any plans nor proposals on this matter to our Homeowners Association for review. Multiple members of the Board, upon learning of these proposed plans, have repeatedly requested the Finstads to provide such plans AS CALLED FOR IN OUR ASSOCIATION BY-LAWS. Today, the Finstads continue to ignore our requests. In addition, since this matter was last discussed with your Board, your request that the Finstads share such plans with the Homeowners Association has also been ignored. Therefore, the Eagle Estates Homeowners Association has no basis to provide an opinion on this matter. However, the four Board members listed below adamantly oppose the proposed variance as such plans clearly conflicts with our By-Laws and we unanimously urge the City of Clearwater to immediately deny this variance request. To grant this application ignores our Eagle Estates Association By-Laws and the rights of the residents of our neighborhood. Thank you for listening to the voice of the people. Respectfully yours, Ms. Karen Bremer, President Mr. Gary Namm, Vice President Ms. Marilynn Cristell, Treasurer Ms. Cassy Millman, Secretary " . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, March 16, 2004, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine:. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff. neie:hborine: property owners. etc. will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved by a sine:le vote at the bee:innine: of the meetine:. 1. (cont. from 12/16/03) Michael & Stefanie Markham are requesting an appeal of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Proj ect, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038). (Proposed Use: A 1,528 square-foot, two-story addition, including a third car garage (with a driveway extension) in association with an existing single-family dwelling) (O~~e,s: Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad) at 2959 Eae:le Estates Cir. W., Eagle Estates, Lot 38. APP2003-00003 W W 2. Top Flie:ht Enterprises. Inc & 1925 Ede:ewater Drive. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction to the front yard setback on Sunnydale Drive from 25 feet to 17 feet to allow balcony support, an increase of building height from 35 feet to 75 feet from base flood elevation of 13 feet MSL (with height calculated to the midpoint of the roof slope) with appurtenances extending 16 feet above the 75 feet (as indicated on the elevation plans) to construct 77 multi-family residential (attached) units, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached multi-family residential units) at 1919 & 1925 Ede:ewater Dr. & 1010. 1012 & 1020 Sunset Point Rd., Sunnydale Sub, Lots 1,2 and W 34 ft of Lot 3; Sunset Point and Replat Lots 2 & 3; Blk A, the E 3 ft of Lot 4, Lot 5,6, 7, together with the W 15 ft of Lot 8. FLD2003-09050 3. Massoud & Malouse Dabiri are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. (Proposed Use: Office building) at 117 McMullen Booth Rd., Crystal Heights Sub, Lots I & 2. FLD2003-11061 4. Belle Aqua Villas. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for six slips totaling 720 square feet, with each dock measuring 60 feet in length from the seawall, in conjunction with a six-unit townhome development) at 125 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No. 2, Lots 7 & 8. FLD2003-11062 5. Belle Aqua Villas. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for six slips totaling 720 square feet, with each dock measuring 60 feet in length from the seawall, in conjunction with a six-unit townhome development) at 116 & 120 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 53 & 54. FLD2003-11063 6. ENT A Investments. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the expansion of a medical clinic with reductions to the front (east along South Fort Harrison Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing building), from 25 feet to three feet (to existing pavement) and from 25 feet to 15 feet (to proposed pavement), reductions to the front (north along "B" Street) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing building) and from 25 feet to seven feet (to proposed dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (south along "C" Street) from 25 feet to two feet (to existing pavement) and reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to existing building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and to permit reductions to the landscape buffer along the front (east along South Fort Harrison Avenue) property line from 15 feet to 10 feet (to existing building) and from 15 feet to three feet (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the front (north along "B" Street) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the front (south along "C" Street) from 10 feet to two feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from five feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G (Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing 3,096 square-foot medical clinic through the renovation of an existing 2,357 square-foot building .. CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 WHEELER, PHILIP H WHEELER, CATHERINE M 2974 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 KOSER, H JEROME COLBETH-KOSER, JUDYTH M 2950 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 MORRILL, KEVIN K MORRILL, LYNDA A 2909 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761- BRAUN, HOWARD BRAUN, ELAINE 2921 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2808 CURRY, PAUL CURRY, ALEXANDRA C 2912 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2805 KELLER, ALLAN G TRE KELLER, JOAN A TRE 2900 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2805 FIGURSKI, GERALD A FIGURSKI, MELODY W 2975 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 MARKHAM, MICHAEL C MARKHAM, STEFANIE G 2960 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2830 WILKS, HARRY S WILKS, VANESSA L 2984 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2830 1\ it .'" .~ BARBOUR, V AN K 2982 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 . PEA TIlE, STEPHEN J PEA TTIE, K L YN 2990 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 SCHOENBAUM, JEFFRY SCHOENBAUM, SUSAN 2966 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 SEARS, LEANNE D TRE 2901 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2808 MC CUTCHEON, GARY W MC CUTCHEON, MOLLIE S 2913 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARW ATER FL 33761 - 2808 FREIFELD, MITCHELL 3375 FOX HUNT DR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - GOEBEL, THOMAS 2908 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2805 NESBIT, TIFFANY D NESBIT, P CRAIG 2991 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 BROWN, MARK W BROWN, SUZANNE 2967 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 GRA WUNDER, GAIL E 2968 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2830 (,,"Ii ",,:~.' RENTON, JOHN B RENTON, EDITH L 2958 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 VINCENT, GILLES VINCENT, ORNELLA 2905 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2808 STUDLEY, RICHARD A REYNOLDS, ERIC Y 2917 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2808 KORNFELD, STEPHEN J KORNFELD, JANICE T 2929 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2808 WILSON, JAMES L WILSON, CHRISTINE W 2904 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2805 TURER, RICHARD S TURER, SUSAN A 2983 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 FINSTAD, JEFFREY A FINSTAD, AMBRYN E 2959 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 NAMM, GARY NAMM, ELIZABETH 2976 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2830 MORELLI, A ROBERT SIMONE, PAUL MORELLI, HELEN N SIMONE, ANITA 2992 TALON DR 2993 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 337~2rL e.LEARW A TER FL 33761 - 2831 . . . LYNCH, RICHARD J CAROLLO, ROBERTJ BROCKMAN, GARY B TRE LYNCH, RAE K CAROLLO, ANN P BROCKMAN, DOROTHY J TRE 2985 TALON DR 2977 TALON DR 2969 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2831 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2831 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2831 GOODMAN, MARK L LUTZ, ROBERTA TRE SULLIV AN, JOHN P GOODMAN, LISA S 2924 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S SULLIV AN, KAREN A 2920 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2807 2970 EAGLE TRL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2807 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2801 MAGDZIAK, MIROSLA W ESPOSITO, PETER V BREMER, JOHN H JR MAGDZIAK, ALICIA ESPOSITO, LORETTA A BREMER, KAREN C 2978 EAGLE TRL 2986 EAGLE TRL 2994 EAGLE TRL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2801 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2801 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2801 HAMM, JOHN E LUBOTSKY, LAWRENCE TRE ST AREGO, MICHAEL J 2886 GREEN MEADOW CT LESWING, KRISTI E TRE 2898 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 2892 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 FLOREK, MICHAEL J CURRENT OWNER WALKER, DEBBIE A FLOREK, BETTY J 2893 GREEN MEADOW CT WALKER, JERRY 2899 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 2881 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 HITTOS, ELENI WINDER, WILLIAM A SCHROEDER, THOMAS P 2879 GREEN MEADOW CT DONAHUE, NOELENE SCHROEDER, DIANE C CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 2875 GREEN MEADOW CT 2869 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 f . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 16, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests: NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine:. Those cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neie:hborine: propertv owners. etc. will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved bv a sine:le vote at the bee:innine: of the meetine:. 1. (cont. from 10/21/03) Robert Hupp & Allen McMullen are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction in the front (north) setback from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and from 35 ft to 16 ft (to generator pad) along Charles Avenue, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 98 spaces (5/1,000 sq ft) to 97 spaces (4.9/1,000 sq ft), an increase in building height from 30 ft to 38.5 ft, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.C and to vacate 242 feet of Allen Avenue right of way (Proposed Use: A 9,560 sq ft medical clinic.) at 3080 Allen Avenue., Acker's Sub, Elk 4, Lots 4-7 & 12- 15, part of Lots 8-11. FLD2003-08037 2. Griffin International Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages on a parcel of land contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residentially zoned property in the Zoning Atlas, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Alcoholic beverage sales within a 2,100 square-foot tenant space located in an existing shopping center) at 1575 S. Hie:hland Ave., Sec. 23-29-15, M&B 34.31. FLD2003-09042 3. G T Leisure Corp. / Roe:ers Beach Development (Villa del Sole of Clearwater Beach, LLC) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit 6 attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pool and decking) and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for 6 lots [Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings (townhomes)] at 181 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 20 & 21 and riparian rights. FLD2003- 09046 4. Island Kev Development. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval for a multi-use dock for the construction/reconstruction of 11 slips, dock and 4 catwalks with boardwalk along the seawall for a residential condominium complex, with a reduction of the side (north and south) setbacks from 18 ft to 16 ft (to catwalks) and from 18 ft to zero ft (to boardwalk) and an increase of the width of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (135 ft) to 100 percent of the lot width (180 ft), under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock of 11 slips for Island Key Condominiwns) at 692 Bavwav Blvd N., Bayside Sub. No.5, Elk A, Lots 21, 22 & 23 and riparian rights. FLD2003-09044 5. BelCal Properties. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (GTE Federal Credit Union), in addition to a proposed distribution center and offices) at 1750 N. Belcher Rd., Clearwater Industrial Park, a part of Lot 12. FLD2003-09047 6. Evervbodv's Tabernacle. Inc. & Homeless Emere:encv Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight units/beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 ft to 17 ft (to stairway ramping) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight units/beds at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 ft to 15 ft (to stairwell) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2- 704.B] (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 8 units/beds) at 1215 & 1211 N. Bettv Ln., Pinebrook Sub. No.2, Blk E, Lots 15 & 16. FLD2003-09048 f . . 7. Homeless Emerl!:encv Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter of 4 beds with a reduction of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4.46 ft (to pavement), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction of the side (west) landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10 ft, as part ofa Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter) at 1003 Carlton St., C.E. Jackson's Sub., Elk 3, Lot 11 less rd. FLD2003-09049 8. Moorinl!: Capital Fund. LLC (Family Resources, Inc.) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter (16 beds for youth in crisis) and a sociaVpublic service agency in the Institutional District with a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 9.5 ft (to pavement), a deviation to allow the residential shelter 900 ft (instead of 600 ft) from a transit line and a deviation to allow a sociaVpublic service agency adjacent to residentially zoned property, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204.A, and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the side (west) property line from 12 ft to 9.5 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter (16 beds) and a sociaVpublic service agency) at 1615 Union St., Sec. 02-29-15, M&B 12.05. FLD2003- 09051 9. Elias Anastopoulos is requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 2 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to ramp), from 10 ft to 1 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 3 ft (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (38 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from 5 ft to 2 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 7,610 sq-ft retail sales and services building) at 700 S. Gulfview Blvd., Bayside Shores, Blk C, Lots 11 & 12 and Bayside Sub. No.6 Unit B, Blk E, Lot 13 and 15 ft vac rd on S. FLD2003-09045 10. ABR Plymouth Plaza. Ltd. (Tampa Bay Water/Jerry L. Maxwell, GM) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit an office building with an increase of building height from 30 ft to 55 ft and a reduction of the side (east) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1004.F. (Proposed Use: 37,000 sq ft three-story office building) at 2575 Enterprise Rd., Sec. 30-28-16, M&B 34.11. FLD2003-09053 11. South Gate Park. Inc. (Tree Tops at Druid) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the side (west) setback from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), an increase of building height to allow perimeter parapets an additional 6 ft (from roof deck) and a deviation from the requirement to screen off-street parking from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304.G, and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 units, five per building)] at 2525 Druid Rd., Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 44.41 and Sever Park, Lot 3 less E 200 ft. FLD2003-08038 12. Dean C. & Anita J. Car1ev are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Residential deck) at 1601 Sand Kev Estates Ct., The Moorings of Sand Key, Lot 30. FLD2003-09043 13. Michael & Stefanie Markham are requesting an appeal of the decision ofa Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038) (Owners: Jeffrev A. & Ambrvn E. Finstad) at 2959 Eal!:le Estates Cir. W., Eagle Estates, Lot 38. APP2003-00003 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Conununity Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to t . .. . . three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. Ad: 11/30/03 " .'- " CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 WHEELER, PHILIP H WHEELER, CATHERINE M 2974 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 KOSER, H JEROME COLBETH-KOSER, JUDYTH M 2950 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2809 MORRILL, KEVIN K MORRILL, LYNDA A 2909 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - BRAUN, HOWARD BRAUN, ELAINE 2921 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2808 CURRY, PAUL CURRY, ALEXANDRA C 2912 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2805 KELLER, ALLAN G TRE KELLER, JOAN A TRE 2900 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATERFL33761-2805 FIGURSKI, GERALD A FIGURSKI, MELODY W 2975 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 MARKHAM, MICHAEL C MARKHAM, STEF ANIE G 2960 TALON DR CLEARWATERFL33761-2830 WILKS, HARRY S WILKS, VANESSA L 2984 TALON DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2830 . PEATTIE, STEPHEN J PEA TTIE, K L YN 2990 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 SCHOENBAUM, JEFFRY SCHOENBAUM, SUSAN 2966 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2809 SEARS, LEANNE D TRE 2901 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2808 MC CUTCHEON, GARY W MC CUTCHEON, MOLLIE S 2913 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2808 FREIFELD, MITCHELL 3375 FOX HUNT DR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - GOEBEL, THOMAS 2908 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2805 NESBIT, TIFFANYD NESBIT, P CRAIG 2991 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2810 BROWN, MARK W BROWN, SUZANNE 2967 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2810 GRA WUNDER, GAIL E 2968 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2830 MORELLI, A ROBERT MORELLI, HELEN N 2992 TALON DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2830 · BARBOUR, V AN K 2982 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2809 RENTON, JOHN B RENTON, EDITH L 2958 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2809 VINCENT, GILLES VINCENT,ORNELLA 2905 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2808 STUDLEY, RICHARD A REYNOLDS, ERIC Y 2917 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2808 KORNFELD, STEPHEN J KORNFELD, JANICE T 2929 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2808 WILSON, JAMES L WILSON, CHRISTINE W 2904 EAGLE ESTATES CIR N CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2805 TURER, RICHARD S TURER, SUSAN A 2983 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 FINSTAD, JEFFREY A FINSTAD, AMBRYNE 2959 EAGLE ESTATES CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2810 NAMM, GARY NAMM, ELIZABETH 2976 TALON DR CLEARWATERFL33761-2830 SIMONE, PAUL SIMONE, ANITA 2993 TALON DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2831 .. " . LYNCH, RICHARD J LYNCH, RAE K 2985 TALON DR CLEARWATERFL33761-2831 GOODMAN, MARK L GOODMAN, LISA S 2920 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2807 MAGDZIAK, MIROSLA W MAGDZIAK, ALICIA 2978 EAGLE TRL CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2801 HAMM, JOHN E 2886 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2820 FLOREK, MICHAEL J FLOREK, BETTY J 2899 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 HITTOS, ELENI 2879 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2820 Michael & Stefanie Markham 2960 Talon Dr. Clearwater, FL 33761 . CAROLLO, ROBERT J CAROLLO, ANN P 2977 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2831 LUTZ, ROBERTA TRE 2924 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2807 ESPOSITO, PETER V ESPOSITO, LORETTA A 2986 EAGLE TRL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2801 LUBOTSKY, LAWRENCE TRE LESWING, KRISTI E TRE 2892 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2820 CURRENT OWNER 2893 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2820 WINDER, WILLIAM A DONAHUE, NOELENE 2875 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2820 . BROCKMAN, GARY B TRE BROCKMAN, DOROTHY J TRE 2969 TALON DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2831 SULLIV AN, JOHN P SULLIVAN, KAREN A 2970 EAGLE TRL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2801 BREMER, JOHN H JR BREMER, KAREN C 2994 EAGLE TRL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2801 STAREGO, MICHAEL J 2898 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATERFL33761-2820 WALKER, DEBBIE A WALKER, JERRY 2881 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2820 SCHROEDER, THOMAS P SCHROEDER, DIANE C 2869 GREEN MEADOW CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2820 41/01 -----1---- CHI CHI RODRIGUEZ GOLF COURSE ;11/01 o CITY OWNED PI'OPERTY 009-11n 5au-2014 tAClt "" '.P.C- Nft.. '8. 8, ~ ~I 'g. " ,g ;; tl ::E ;if <: II) '" ;:i a; o o N ;;j o oj ~ '0 ai 8 Iii :5 ~ <: u o l- :::> S ~ t9 ~ Vi c.... w. CITY OF CLEARWATER AIlD VICIIlrfY PINEU.AS COUllty. FLORIDA PRE:PARED BY PUBIJC WORKS ADlIINISTRATJON ENC~EERINC 100 S. lI)flle A~.. CtearftDtrr. n 337511 Pt>" (813)162-4750. r.. (81))526-4755 M'p: Ilwww.dlDntaler-fLcom/.I\q!...ar/ DlKiolf'l'lCr: p,,~lc "'formatIon dolo's tumlsned c.y In.. CIty of CI,arwaler Public Work' AClmnlalro1lon/Erigln..,lnq. and mUI' I), occrpte4 !It'd vied lty lhe ,."Ipllot .Ilh Ihe WtdcntondlnQ ttlot the dato rec!riveC! WQS CClUect~ for U.e purpose of d~Qpln9 0 <TOPhic /nfroslruC'lllle "'vcntDl)'. As ""d\, the City of Oearwolft' PWA!t mole.. no warron'..... etpr..sed or implIed. COI'c,rn'I"i; tn. occurcx:y. complelCf'ns. rctloblllly, 01 _sultGbUlty 0' thb dolo fO( any olher porUcl,Ilor "'e. Furttlcr,"OIl~. Ihe City of Oea'wottf PWA./[ OMU"'." no llall'lllty whllh;ot'wt ossodol~d wit... the uu: Ot' ml"'H or ~dt doto. UQ!f; Thl. Alia. poq_ I. .,b~ to ptrl'lod~ c"'-9n. for InfQl",ol!on about lotcsl revisions please coil PWA/E or ,,"i.lt OUt Wn "ftt. N EB e 0 100 200 490 600 I I I --.J SCALE: ,. 3 400' LEGEND; N o ..... ~ ~ ~ BLOC~ NUMBER 1234 LOT ApDRESS CiTY LIMiTS LINE 1!",,"'cc,;J SHADED AREA - PROPERTY Li;i",'",,", OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS . AGREEMENT TO ANNEX . CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION - ZONE LINE - KlOfolE OR!) [!].al1 08/'1:1/19 REVISED: 03/08/99 ZONING ATLAS ' 200B SE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 - 28 5 - 16 E 1 41/01 -----1---- 31/0' CHI CHI RODRIGUEZ GOlF COURSE o CJlY OWNED PROPeRTV 4709-1177 .......... EACl.E 'a g, ~ ~I ~ ~ 0; l:l ~ ::f < ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ o i " ~ ~ ~ o < () o I- ::l S Z c.; ~ Vi Ct.... w. CITY OF CLEARWATER AlII) V1C1IIl'I'Y PIIlBIl.AS COUJI'fT. FLORlDl PREPARED BY PVBUC lIORKS ADlllNISTRATlON E'NCINQRlHC 100 '5. 1I)rl1e A..... Ctecrwotlt, n m5a Ph.: f1l11)562-4750, FOl: (S13}521-4755 hi": 11......dlUlwol..-neom/.N)ln... / Public Int'ormot$oft dolo '- tI,nltned by thlt City or CI~rwat.' PUbeIc WOI'U """"""trotlon/E",,"",1nq. and mUlt ~. Occ:.,tH ond u.ed by 'he reelplef\t ~\h the' loIPdef.tondiaQ thot the doto recelwd was CCllkocl~ for the purpoee of dlWlop'"9 0 CTGpttlc InfrostruduI. 11\.,...101')'. As SIdl. ,,,. City of CIeotwottf' PWA/t m... no WGlTOIlU... tJI[~HMd or ImpII.d. CMCt"''"9 tn, occurocy. cornptet...... relloblltty. Of wltClbll"v of th. dota few any other potllcular uw. Furthermore. Ihe City o( ClHtWGter- PWA/E 0""'"" no liattlllr .mal~..,., onodatird wIth the uu Ot ",l!use DI ""ch doto,; I!lllll; This Atln IN'IP .. wbJtd 10 I:lft'lodle chcHIqn. for information obout Iotest revlslcns plea'H 1:01 PWA/t or \II;t OUt WetI site. N EB 0 100 200 490 600 I I , I SCAlE: I" . 400' LEGEND; @ BLOCl< NUMBER I\.) o ..... )> ~ ----- CITY LIMITS LINE 1234 LOT ApDRESS EE53 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX . CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION - ZONE LINE 1fEl'0J\II[0Itc. Q]4I'Z OI/15/n REVISED: 03/08/99 ZONING ATLAS' 2008 SE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 - 28 S - 16 E . . CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owners: Appellant: Address: March 16. 2004 APP 2003-00003 El Jeffrey and Ambrvn Finstad Michael and Stefanie Markham(2960 Talon Drive. Clearwater. FL. 33761) 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUMMARY OF EVENTS NOTE: The Community Development Board (CDB) heard this appeal case at its meeting on December 16, 2003. It was continued to a date no later than the March 16, 2004 CDB meeting. The CDB encouraged resolution of the setback issue through the homeowners' association prior to the March CDB meeting. The owners have not yet sought approval from the homeowners' association, desiring a CDB decision first. Section 4-504.A provides that a decision by the CDB be made not later than 70 days from the receipt of the notice of appeal, unless the parties by mutual consent extend the time frame for the Board's decision. Both parties consented at the December 16, 2003, CDB meeting to the time frame of rendering a decision by the Board no later than March 16,2004. GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Appeal of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038). BACKGROUND: This 0.298-acre site is located on the northeast comer of Eagle Estates Circle West and Eagle Estates Circle South. This comer lot presently contains a 2,815 square-foot, single-story detached dwelling building, including an attached two-car garage, and is zoned LDR, Low Density Residential District. This case is an appeal of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 103.B, under Case No. FLS2003-08038. The application was considered by the Development Review Committee at its meeting on September 18, 2003. A Development Order (Exhibit "A") was issued approving the request on October 29, 2003. Attached is the Staff Report (Exhibit "B") for the Flexible Standard Development case, where objections of the appellants were originally addressed. Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16,2004 - Case APP2003-00003 - Page 1 . . APPEAL PROCESS: The appellants filed this appeal on November 4, 2003. Section 4-501.A.3 of the Community Development Code states that the Community Development Board has the authority to hear appeals from Level One approval decisions. Section 4-502.A provides that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by an applicant or property owner within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. Section 4-504.B states that upon receipt of the application/notice of appeal, the Community Development Board (CDB) shall place the appeal on the consent agenda of the next scheduled meeting of the CDB. Notice of the date of such meeting shall be provided the applicant and the appellants by mail and by telephone. The appeal may be removed from the consent agenda only by a vote of at least four members of the CDB. If the appeal is not removed from the consent agenda, the decision of the Community Development Coordinator is confirmed as part of the consent agenda by a vote of the majority of the members of the CDB. If the appeal is removed from the consent agenda, the CDB shall review the application, the recommendation of the Community Development Coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application in accord with Section 4-206 (notice and public hearings) and render a decision in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-206.D.5 granting the appeal, granting the appeal subject to specified conditions or denying the appeal. Pursuant to Section 4-504.C of the Community Development Code, in order to grant an appeal, (overturning or modifying the decision under appeal), the CDB shall find that, based on substantial competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party, all of the following criteria are met: 1) The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of the Community Development Code; and That the decision will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Community Development Code; and Will not be detrimental to the pu lic health, safety and general welfare. i JJ 2) 3) Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Zoning Atlas Map Exhibits A - J IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiPending cases I Up for the next CDBIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad Appeal\Eagle Estates Circle W 2959 Appeal Staff Report 3.16.04.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case APP2003-00003 - Page 2 ) " ,I " v '\ ,I . . .- ,..' ...... Owner: I . 2989 FP.C. Meter ~fr-'~ ~-]---\ -D~1aeh~( :-,_-~--;, u_',:- '---~ C < 0 ': : '-, -..I~ 1~I~n~ ' : 0: ' '......_'~_&.: ~_____~~ By I.~, 1__.._.._~1 __'''__~. __ ~~: I I___~ ,i:].. ~ C't C't C't '" C't '" C't ~ EAGLE ESTA TES CIR N d!l ( ~----.---: :---u1!J~ . ,__I I ,--- ?oo1-----' ...----~ :- -. --I -, '-. , , , : _ __ 22211 ,_.----, ~ I_I , ' ............\ .. :---i~2 ~~:~iJ '-\,.:8_~ 2893ld~el i':'f!~~i (-2~~ r----J ..: ;-.......... -~ :: : ,_I I I ["_____J 28i] I-I 1---..i958 1_...... __I ,r~ ___'l~\,::,..,~\'i:.) C't ,_I \ ,.,,' u \- !; I ~ ~ tJ ~ ~ ,._u_., ,-----, C) :"--1: : I' r- -, ,-, 111 ?QQI ~----' :---lI~92 111 ;. -Deta hell 2~4 en I I 1';-' :""'I '..I, ' 1 _,u' . ):Ii 2913Q-we IDes__:' ~ r------- !-----...--: ITi -, " en 1 I ---: 297: ~ 29~~~~::_~ ;__u_: "!O: :,' I :-- _~I '" : 1__- 2968 ---I , , ,---_.-. , ' , .. '--__.. I 2960 , , " 1___...... .. .. _'. ( 2959 ....... '.. "'\_)~..:-- < '-:i / <........ ~.... -', . ^ "\ :z,995.__, , , '-: : / 1.___2S196 2~pe~~c~~d-'-~! ~ :-dw~n m!s7Yll~ ,... :------: )---- : o " : ~ :. \ :t 29hL.. __ _I~ : --: tJ '-~::~:'!. :tI ~~----i : : 29-1,7 ", ,--I -~ I , ~ ' 1~1 2Q1i~---' :..---~~22'aJ 29Ar -, , '. .-1 I . , :-~ ~~\ J7\ ;'.:. I ,.... ''Atf~ - ",I( :t: " (j) r- 111 iI r- 2963 , I I-I 1_.. .. :--;'..-'---~I , , "'-1 , &1 _u_u__ '" 2961 EAGLE ESTATES CIR S :--"-:.i- , ",' -, ' ..~ --.. j :- ....I-g_ 'D,~aeb(( -._'~- '" '" .- -':..-.it. I- --,-~: .--_&1- :-. ~ '" . "" '" ~.. (\lll _~w~~'li~~ -, ' . ' --I_- I.. _I , ' ._1"';_1 1 1-"_-' -~-, ------ -.' -- Golf Course ):;;-' '---1_-.. I ',I I,: --""1,_ .~.:. '\ ~ ;--~ : '.%,.-- ..- 1:; l:I__::. C---..~120 a- ~ ~ - n'el iCIied . , , , - . - r' r- . , ~.dw~ Qjn~ , , , , , ,---~ ~--~- (\l" ---I - - '" ~ -- '" '" '" '" '" Existing Surrounding Uses Map I Case: Property Size(Acres) : Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad Site: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West PIN: APP2003-00003 0.298 acres 20/28/16/23638/000/0380 A tlas Page: 200B . . " m Ii AllEN AVE Location Map Owner. Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad \ Case: Property Size(Acres) : APP2003-00003 Site: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West 0.298 acres PIN: 20/28/16/23638/000/0380 \ Atlas Page: 200B ORIGIN/ I , , . . Aerial Map Owner. Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad \ Case: Property Size(Acres): APP2003-00003 Site: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West 0.298 acres PIN: 20/28/16/23638/000/0380 I Atlas Page: 200B . 2989 F.P. C. Mete,. u s; :t o ~ ~ o ::u ,....., " '...., " , , , , ........ "-I , , , , -I I ~ ,. , , . '893 ~___J , ", , . :_ 28~ 1__- ... :' - 28,8_6 , , , , , ~_____J --........... -I , . I .,_1 28~j 1- , , I....... ___I '" \0 ., '" , ,-' Owner: , t___~?~ .------j I ,_I \ ' . ' 1_.. -~9B2 ,------.., , ' , ' -; .. -. ' : , 4974 , , , ' , -' , " .. -; -' ~_2~U j-----l , ' , , : _I U'. -1958 .-, . , .-.... '.. '----1 ... _I I " ~... () I .......,_r~_,g.: .. ~ C) .... 111 111 en ~ ~ en ~ ~ 1_-:1 , ,-_..... --I , , , , , . 1----- 2983 i............... .., , ' -. , , , 297500-- :..-- -........, , . ~,I ...-' , , , , I, ----I , , 1- __.. ___ 2959 '--'., ~ I ....;:J>,- , ..' " ' ..~-_.. -~ " RlOS ......" , , , , , :---1.... .. , " , , , , I ......... l__' .- --I , , r -- I , . " ~--- -- -~ ~ .. ,- --..-, , , . ' . '. :.- -2-!1112 ,----- I 2984 , . ,. ,.' ,-- . , -..._____1 :-----...--, , '---: 29f~ . ' '" ___.._1 , . , ,-- , , 1-----296s .-___1-, . ' , I .. -- -.... ~ 2960 ~.. -1_,-g_ :- ~ --1_- ,--.. 1,-, , , . . gt-_::- _: '" .. - ,--I r -- I r- -.. . " ,- " , Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad , I I...... .~, .!____.t---: ~--___:-_I " 2gjS-....----. , . I... .._I , ' ~____J r-------. .. . Site: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West I -: , I . . -:793lS .------, , ' ..:---- : , , , , , , '----2918 ~ ,! ~ - -,,'-I_~ : ('It: , , , , :. _: "- ~ - .....1 :~~~ '" I---'-~: "" '. ' , ' '" ."_ St- .. ,--!._Ji ~.. r,1, , ' , ' ~ -~- '"-" :--._r~-l , '" , , , , I 1_- __.... __: __1";_1 :'R' ~ - ~-'oo ~ '" 1-. -I . , 1 "'-1 , i-~--.: .. , , , , , ' r,' ___ 1 ~ 1___' '" , . , , , ~__j--i .. -' '. , r-' , , , , , b_-. : :\l .. r-- , ',- Future Land Use Map I Case: Property Size{Acres) : PIN: APP2003-00003 0.298 acres 20/28/16/23638/00010380 Atlas Page: 200B . . . , , , 2989 F .P.C. Meter . , , , . w""" _, : ' , ,- , 2893 ~..-_... , , '-- :_1_ ~8_~ :-- -18,8_6 , , , :_-----~ r-----,-:, 28~~____~: ,........... '" '" .. ... , , , .. -_.....'- , , , ' t___22J .-'-""" -. , , \ :- :---iJa2 :------i I~ d .. _, I :_.2.9-7~ " , I , I ' , -' I " --L_39~ ,-_:----: " . , I I I ~\,~,-.~_!~ L_-____~-j ... '" ... . i----~_ , , : : '.._ I t"'_g' ... f" _i-: , , ,. , I_I" ~I - -'" ... -, EAGLE ESTATES CIR N ..s:- ... ~ Ci) r-- 111 111 (I) i! ~ (I) Q ::0 ~ ,.------, I , I--r~__.: i-----, , , " : 298- u -- r----....-: -, ' , , I . 297S---- ~_.. -........., , , ~I I I I , , '- u. .i958 . -, .." ~ ~ , , , ' '.______J 2959 '- '--'"WI ~ . ..Do- ~I C't: '1 , l.._____ OS/R ,-----, , , , ' , " :--<1992 ~--29i4 , ' " ,__I , -.....____1 '. I' ,-----.,--, , , :,L -n , . \0- _...._I , , ,__I _..' , ' '--"--296& .----'-, , ' , : L ___. I 2960 .-" --, : I~____J-_I ~ r-- o 4: o ::0 ,--- 2915 -----, , :~ CoO ~_____I 1- -- , , , , , ,.____ I , , , - - "'ZY85 .- --- , , ' - , . , , , .u--29 !: Ci) r-- 111 ~ r-- 2963 Zoning Map Owner: Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad .------, '-.. : c- , , " 29tQ___ _. ~ ,.------ , ' I ' 2977 .' : , ~ 296~---' i------. ,__ 1_, t_,.. 'oO" ~ 2961 , ,__I , '---u.22ID '-, :-;___,---~, , , ~-I I S1 -------- '" EAGLE ESTA TES CIR S ;--'..Ii- , ... 1_1__,_- ~ - -.'-l_~ : ~: , , , , I .- --- 1__1 Site: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West " __:,10:-' , '" , , , ---, I 1- -. I 1,-. , , ~ ,-, : ~__II__1 '" 1-- -, ,. 1 I .. r ~-,__ j ~_~-: ~1 '" '" ~ ... \ Case: Property Size (Acres) : PIN: Atlas Page: ~--._'~-: : ~ : , , I____~__: '" I---'-~ 1_ ('ll , ' , ' -;,-,~-; '" -,'-~~ : ... . , :--.._.~ I., C"f , -- 1__1 I i--~ ~~' I , ' ~--. : ~ --- ... , . , , ' ",l_.... I ~ ~--' ... '. , , : --- ~ 1__1 ~ ... -' APP2003-00003 0.298 acres 20/28/16/23638/000/0380 200B View looking north at dwelling View looking northeast at dwelling 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West APP2003-00003 View looking north at dwelling ~, ~.......~ -..-."".:. - - ----- -- View looking east at north property line 1 . L.- View looking northwest toward subject .. property looking at 2980 Talon Drive ~'" , View looking southwest at 2901 Eagle Estates Circle South 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West APP2003-00003 . View looking south at 2905 Eagle Estates Circle South L ,~~ -_.._~_. -' I View looking west at 2950 Eagle Estates Circle West 2 . . CDB Meeting Date: December 16, 2003 Case Number: APP 2003-00003 Agenda Item: G 1 ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUMMARY OF EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION: OWNERS: Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad APPELLANT: Michael and Stefanie Markham (2960 Talon Drive, Clearwater, FL 33761) LOCATION: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West REQUEST: Appeal of the decision of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038). BACKGROUND: This 0.298-acre site is located on the northeast corner of Eagle Estates Circle West and Eagle Estates Circle South. This corner lot presently contains a 2,815 square-foot, single-story detached dwelling building, including an attached two-car garage, and is zoned LDR, Low Density Residential District. This case is an appeal of a Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 103.B, under Case No. FLS2003-08038. The application was considered by the Development Review Committee at its meeting on September 18,2003. A Development Order (Exhibit "A") was issued approving the request on October 29, 2003. Attached is the Staff Report (Exhibit "B") for the Flexible Standard Development case, where objections of the appellants were originally addressed. APPEAL PROCESS: The appellants filed this appeal on November 4, 2003. Section 4-501.A.3 of the Community Development Code states that the Community Development Board has the authority to hear appeals from Level One approval decisions. Section 4-502.A provides that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by an applicant or property owner within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case APP 2003-00001 Page I ..-J . . Level One review within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. Section 4-504.B states that upon receipt of the application/notice of appeal, the Community Development Board (CDB) shall place the appeal on the consent agenda of the next scheduled meeting of the CDB. Notice of the date of such meeting shall be provided the applicant and the appellants by mail and by telephone. The appeal may be removed from the consent agenda only by a vote of at least four members of the CDB. If the appeal is not removed from the consent agenda, the decision of the Community Development Coordinator is confirmed as part of the consent agenda by a vote of the majority of the members of the CDB. If the appeal is removed from the consent agenda, the CDB shall review the application, the recommendation of the Community Development Coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application in accord with Section 4-206 (notice and public hearings) and render a decision in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-206.D.5 granting the appeal, granting the appeal subject to specified conditions or denying the appeal. Pursuant to Section 4-504.C of the Community Development Code, in order to grant an appeal, overturning or modifying the decision appealed from, the CDB shall find that based on substantial competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party: 1) The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of the Community Development Code; 2) That the decision will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Community Development Code; and 3) Will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Zoning Atlas Map Exhibits A - J \\MS5cIPDSIPlanning Department\C D B\FLEXlPending cases \ Up for the next CDBIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad AppeallEagle Estates Circle W 2959 Appeal Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case APP 2003-00001 Page 2 . . Plaming Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 CASE #: M.(' 1....0 t) ~ - t) () 00 ') DATE RECEIVED: JJr+l.ti.~ _=-=- RECEIVED BY (staff ini~: __ y~__ ~ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION ~ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $100.00__ APPEAL APPLICATION u,\'d On" and u,vd Two R"vi"ws (Rt.'\;S<'l! 03/29/0 I ) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICATION/NOTICE OF APPEAL (Code Section 4-502.A & B) An appeal of a level one approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subjeet of the approval within seven days of the date the development order is issued. The filing of an applicationl notice of appeal shall stay the eKect of the decision pending the final determination ofthe case. All application/ notice of appeal of appeal of any decision of the city, as provided in Section 4-501, may be initiated by the applicant Of any person granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be filed with the city clerk in a form specified by the community development CDordnator identifying with spedficity the basis for the appeal and a=mpanied bya fee as reqlired by Sedion 4-202.E The filing of an application! notice r:i appeal shall stay the effeet of the decisioo pending the final determination of the case. A. APPELLANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPELLANT NAME: M~(;~~\ D~~ket.", MAILING ADDRESS: lfl_j.!1~ Q_~-r ~~J2~ .ye__~ \,~~ ~~'\r _~'7b L___________ PHONENUMBER: 7JL_l'jb-_ ~70 _____ FAX NUMBER: 7~1__41:2:- to2iS__________ AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER: B. APPEAL INFORMATION CHECK THE SPECIFIC APPEAl: ADoeals to the Communitv Develooment Board CJ Orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made by an administrative official in the administration of the development code, except (or enforcement actions. CJ Administrative interpretations of the development code '~ level One (Flexible and Minimum Standard) approval decisions CJ Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions ofthis Code ADDRESS OF SUBJECT APPEAl (if applicable): ). ~ .5:i-- ~~ toll Cs~-\e5 __ C ; r E/ l~~ ~ t.____ f LS 200'~ - 0'13 O'2.JS ADoeals to a hearina officer CJ Decisions of the community development board regarding level two approvals CJ Decisions of the community development board regarding level one approvals CJ OTHER (as allowed by Code) SPECIFIC CASE NUMBER TO BE APPEAlED (if applicable): DATE OF DECISION: (0 I ~q I D :; ---~-~--------- Page 1 of 2 - Appeal Application (level One and level Two Reviews)- City of Clearwater . . c. BASIS OF APPEAL: Explain in detail the basis for the appeal. Use additional sheets if necessary. _ @,tlc;es _~~ c~--:-_%l v&_~_-kll~~j~______________________ -.-!lj~ _~1-G4IL_?~4J5_J:_ c ~~~ ~_Q:"-~_~ ^ c c"~s-h+_\.t"K (.'\\tt~~_ \( ~~ e__~& --1~~ It _____J!_~~_i~~~(' _.h,k-,-,~_~i~~?ll~(~+).,p~!L~--~ ~ ~4__4.<-t~~-""'9'- 5S_J-_____ _.1-1L vcJ.~c:l)- ~~_~~ le__~~~__ ~ _!- r;~1 ~__~~i_ b ~J3I:d'f_-~k&j'b __ ~e.. --.:~~\ v 2SJ~J__ '\ <-_t', - '\l"..s ~~ <t Y' i a~c.z. -J--------------------------- ~-ihe-~1c~-L w-\1ule~ to, ~Mll~h~-(V.f--~~~--b~-1~pV'Q~~~-oJ.!.~.; _-1J-i~__~'VsJ21~'~L- cr>-Jl~__?'~., +__~.~~~#~-~- 5_ ~s T~~'~__~ e*'~_ ____ e...'Ud~^~_t----:::.-------------------------------------------- -.5J-=l~~_\{lLS, tL'\.loijw,v-f-t-d;'>(.rJ''A;''a.'tvvy ~&UNl.r~.-iU;6'V\a1.'\-e; ----;---- ~)i~~~~'f~cJL I~ 'I\(<"y..,; <,+e.,k \...v,~ Ye('c'r~.& ~&L !!~&:..\Y;~*"~~ ~& \[e~~l+s ____L~.L_L\ __'!.\ <> J.~\ o,~__tl: _~ e~ ~~_~ ~ ~tv 04-~4~~-~Y~~\ '12;__~ &--- --=tl +4L CcM~, 1\ Ovl 5 ~~ _~t _ M IA~L~---s~d ~v SL_ e {fe,c. ~ , D. SIGNATURE: //lQe(~ Signature of property O'Mler or representative STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF P1NELLAS J [, 1- ~to Bri<rSubscribed before me this ~ day ci _ ~ __. A.D. 20.J2 :3 to me and/or by --4ie ~}-Ji'~ who is personally known _has prcxluced LjU- as identificati on. ~iL CL(~p Notary public. My commission expires: I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. \IMS20.PD&P1ooning DeperlmenMpplicalion Formsldevelopmenl revievMppeeJ Application. doc ~\,\\\lIIIt""111 ~,\~ ~etine A. ~ II,;;. ~ C;~ ....... e..... ~ '* .., ~\SSIO '. .,0. ~ $ .- 0\1\ W..<":-.:fG' ~ ;::> .' ""-.0 ~ber,O '1;0'. ~ ~ . ~ ~'O "cl ~. -::,. =*: cJ' ~{1'\~ ~ :: . c.;nffi. = ::: .... :*: _:z: . #DD"t:An .- - a . ViJ'KJ79 .- ~~.. .. ~~ ~~.. ~~llIro .'~~ ~ ~:'" ~kHn~..', C5 S' ~ ""8, ....... K<(v~, "'I,~/C, STA1\:. a,,"" :f1""IItlH'\'\\\: Page 2 of 2 - Appeal Application (level One and level Two Reviews)- City of Clearwater . . CASE NO. APP2003-00003 LIST OF EXHIBITS A. Development Order for FLS2003-08028, dated October 29,2003 (three pages) B. Staff Report for FLS2003-08038 (six pages) C. Application for FLS2003-08038 (nine pages) D. Survey for 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West (one page) E. Proposed Site Plan (two pages) F. Surveys showing reduced side setbacks between 10-15 feet, submitted by applicant ( 11 pages) G. Email from Wayne Wells to Markham & Sullivan, dated October 30,2003 (one page) H. Email from Markham, dated September 17, 2003 (two pages) 1. Email from Sullivan, dated September 17,2003 (two pages) J, Emails between Wayne Wells and Markham, dated September 7,2003, and September 9, 2003 (three pages) . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRnE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LoNG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW October 29,2003 Mr. Jeffrey Finstad Mrs. Ambryn Finstad 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Clearwater, Florida 33761 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-08038 at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Dear Mr. and Mrs. Finstad: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202,E of the Community Development Code. On September 18, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provision of Section 2-103.B. The proposal includes a 1,528 square-foot, two-story addition to an existing single-family residence. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-103.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the property survey be updated prior to the submission for building permits to less out the abutting dedicated rights-of-way; 2. That an oversized roof gutter and drain spout, to direct house and garage roof drainage to Eagle Estates Circle South (not the rear of the lot), be shown on building plans and be installed prior to the issuance of a Final Inspection; '&~~ :+ BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER A HoYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bn.L]ONSON, COM1sl0NER , "EQUAL EM "DYMENT AND AFFIRMATWE ACTION EMPLOYER" \. ~ ~." ) . . October 29,2003 Finstad - Page Two 3. That, to ensure stormwater runoff will not create adverse impacts on the abutting properties, existing and proposed land elevations be submitted for review as part of the permitting process for the addition; 4. That, should the existing hedge along the east property line be damaged or destroyed during construction to the extent of reducing the opacity of the hedge by more than 25 percent, a six- foot high solid fence be installed and maintained along the east property line for privacy purposes (maximum ofthree feet high within the 25-foot front setback area); and 5. That the final design of the building, including window banding, be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted and the color of the dwelling be consistent throughout. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with above five conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received August 19, 2003. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (October 29, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal may be initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property owners who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review, The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on November 5,2003 (seven days from date of Development Order). . October 29,2003 Finstad - Page Three . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. * Make Us Your Favorite! Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director CC: Michael and Stefanie Markham John and Karen Sullivan IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlStandard Flexlpending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DRCIEagle Estates Or W 2959 - Finstad {LDR)IEagilf:2959 Development Order. doc . . DRC Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Time: Applicant: Address: September 18. 2003 FLS2003-08038 10:00 am Mr. & Mrs. Jeffrev and Ambryn Finstad 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FILE COpy GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential IOOll Project, under the provision of Section 2-103.B. EXISTING ZONING: Low Density Residential (LDR). EXISTING LAND USE: Residential Suburban Classification (RS). PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Single-family residential Single-family residential ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES: North: West: East: South: Single-family residential Single-family residential Single-family residential Single-family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: The 0.423-acre site is located on the east side of Eagle Estates Circle West, approximately 400 feet south of Eagle Estates Circle North. The site is zoned LDR, Low Density Residential District and is located within a single-family residential subdivision. The site is a comer lot and contains an existing 2,815 square-foot, single-story, single-family dwelling, including a two-car garage. The site has an existing, two-car wide driveway on Eagle Estates Circle South, which also provides access to a circular driveway on the south side of the house. The lot is 93.5 feet by 140 feet (approximately 13,040 square feet), which is nonconforming to current lot width and area standards. When originally platted, the lot included the private street rights-of-way of Eagle Estates Circle West and Eagle Estates Circle South. These streets were dedicated to the City of Clearwater a number of years ago as public rights-of-way. The survey submitted shows the property lines extending to the centerline of the rights-of-way, which should be updated to less out the rights-of-way. The Community Development Code provides for comer lots to have two front setbacks (abutting street rights-of-way) and the other "sides" to be side setbacks (no rear setback). This subdivision includes single and two-story dwellings, all with at least a two-car garage, but many with three-car garages. The proposal includes constructing a 1,528 square-foot, two-story addition, including a third car garage (with a driveway extension) in association with the existing single-family dwelling on the east side of the house. The second floor of the addition is intended for two bedrooms, an exercise area and a media room. The house and driveway are presently set back 20 feet from the east property line. The applicant proposes the addition at a side setback from the east property line of 10 feet. The Code requires a minimum IS feet side setback. The applicant has submitted surveys from various lots within this subdivision verifying side setbacks between 10 and 15 feet. The applicants' own house is set back 10.5 feet from the north property line. When determining the community character regarding setbacks, IIMSS,IPDSlPi",mg Depa,<mM"C D B'''wd,", FiaIP''"'',g C,,~12 - R",.6d~'~:~3:Di,gl' ES C<, W 2959 - Fi"',", (WR) IE",I"959 "'!if R'p,".d,,- C' " ~.. . ) . . Planning staff has relied upon verification of similar setbacks within the neighborhood, and not in a particular direction. Two homeowners within this subdivision have submitted letters of objection to the proposal, including the property owner directly to the east of the subject lot, with the following issues: 1. Conformance with the subdivision deed restrictions - The City does not enforce deed restrictions, which may be more restrictive than City Codes. The applicant will also need to obtain approval of the proposal from the homeowner's association. 2. Determination of required setback - As stated above, this is a comer lot, which requires compliance with front setbacks abutting street rights-of-way and side setbacks on the other "sides" (in this particular case). The Code does not require a rear setback for a comer lot. 3. Dwelling size and height - So long as the dwelling meets the required setbacks (or obtains variances to build closer to property lines), building height and the impervious surface ratio, a property owner may build as large a dwelling as possible. The Code does not set a size restriction. The maximum building height in the LDR District is 30 feet, measured for a pitched roof to the mid-point of the roof. In this case, the proposed height is 26 feet. 4. Second floor windows - The property owner to the east is concerned with second floor windows facing his property and the loss of privacy, wherein he has suggested frosting the windows. Most zoning codes generally provide for two-story single-family dwellings and do not require fencing for the first floor (usually a maximum six-foot high fence may be installed by property owners along side and rear property lines for privacy, security or to protect pools) nor frosting of windows for second floor windows. From a general and fire safety standpoint, windows should be viewable (allowing views to the outside or from the outside in, except for any window treatments such as drapes), except for bathroom windows. The property owner to the east is also concerned that the windows be framed similar to existing windows. Based on photographs of the existing dwelling and proposed building elevations, proposed windows will be banded similar to existing windows. 5. Impervious surface ratio (ISR) - Calculation of the ISR, not including the abutting rights-of-way, indicates an existing ISR of 0.52 and a proposed ISR of 0.56, still below the maximum of 0.60. 6. Drainage - The property owner to the east is concerned with water runoff onto his property due to the proposal to build within 10 feet of the common property line. Stormwater Engineering has recommended inclusion of a condition to require an oversized roof gutter and drain spout for the house and garage roof to direct roof drainage to Eagle Estates Circle South and not the rear of the lot. To ensure stormwater runoff will not create adverse impacts on the abutting properties, existing and proposed land elevations should be submitted for review as part of the permitting process. 7. Construction fencing - For safety concerns, the property owner to the east desires a construction fence to minimize the possibility of an attractive nuisance to his children. The Building Code requires construction sites to be maintained in a safe condition. If in the determination of the Building Inspector the site is not safe, the inspector could require safety measures be implemented. 8. Construction cost - Construction costs are a market-based issue. For plan examination and permitting fees, costs are based on the value of the project. 9. Existing hedge along the east property line - There is an existing hedge of at least six feet in height along the east property line on the subject parcel. The property owner to the east, as well as the subject property owner, desire privacy. The property owner to the east also is concerned with car lights shining into their yard and odors from a trash container (most likely to be stored on the east side of the dwelling, much as it is today). Section 3-201.D.l requires trash containers and outdoor mechanical equipment to be screened, which may accomplished with fencing or hedging. There is no provision under City Code to require the installation of any hedge or fence for privacy in a single-family subdivision, except potentially along the outside perimeter of a subdivision. The applicant desires to retain the existing hedge. From a fencing standpoint, the maximum height of a fence or wall along is six feet. Should the existing hedge be damaged or destroyed during construction reducing the opacity of the hedge by more than 25 percent, then a six-foot high solid fence should be installed and maintained along the east property line for privacy purposes (maximum of three feet high within the 25-foot front setback area). 10. Construction timing - The property owner to the east is concerned with the length of time construction could take, the hours of the day for construction and whether there would be a port-a-let and a \\MS5cIPDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BlStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and PendingI09-J8-03 DRC\Eagle Estates Or W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page 2 of 6 . . construction dumpster. Generally, for a project as proposed, construction should take no more than six months. City Code restricts the hours of the day and the days of the week for construction to 7 am to 6 pm, Monday through Saturday. Most likely, a port-a-let will be provided for construction workers and there will be a construction dumpster. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3- 913) and Residential Infill Project criteria (Section 2-103.B) have been met. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: STANDARD REQillRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT PERMITTED MAXIMUM One dwelling unit One dwelling One dwelling unit Yes DENSITY unit IMPERVIOUS 0.60 0.52 0.56 Yes SURFACE RATIO (ISR) LOT AREA 20,000 square feet 13,040 square 13,040 square Yes* (minimum) feet feet LOT WIDTH 100 feet 93.5 feet 93.5 feet Yes* (minimum) FRONT West: 25 feet West: 30 feet West: 30 feet Yes SETBACK** South: 25 feet South: 30 feet South: 30 feet REAR SETBACK N/A (Corner lot) N/A N/A N/A SIDE SETBACK East: 15 feet East: 20 feet East: 10 feet Yes North: 15 feet North: 10.5 feet North: 10.5 feet HEIGHT 30 feet 16.75 feet 26 feet Yes (maximum) PARKING Two spaces/unit Six spaces (two Eight spaces Yes SPACES in garage; four (three in garage; in driveway) five in driveway) *Lots in this subdivision originally included half of the abutting 50-foot wide private right-of-way, which was dedicated a number of years ago to the City of Clearwater. This lot is now a nonconforming lot. **Front setbacks are measured from the front property line and do not include any of the dedicated right-of-way. I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D B\Standard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)\Eagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page 3 of6 . . FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-103.B): 1. Development or redevelopment of the parcel IS impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards; Consistent Inconsistent [X] [ ] 2. Development of the parcel as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; [X] [ ] 3. Uses within the residential infill proj ect are permitted in the district; [X] [ ] 4. Uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; [X] [ ] 5. Development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; [X] [ ] 6. Design of the residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity; [X] [ ] 7. Flexibility in lot width, setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified. [X] [ ] \ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report.doc- Page 4 of 6 . . GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent [X] [ ] 1. Development of the land will be III harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. [X] [ ] 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. [X] [ ] 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. [X] [ ] 5. Development IS consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. [X] [ ] 6. Design of the proposed development nnmnuzes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. [X] [ ] I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and Pending\09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page 5 of 6 . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on September 18, 2003. The Planning Department reconunends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development application to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1 03.B for the site at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-103.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the property survey be updated prior to the submission for building permits to less out the abutting dedicated rights-of-way; 2. That an oversized roof gutter and drain spout, to direct house and garage roof drainage to Eagle Estates Circle South (not the rear of the lot), be shown on building plans and be installed prior to the issuance of a Final Inspection; 3. That, to ensure stormwater runoff will not create adverse impacts on the abutting properties, existing and proposed land elevations be submitted for review as part of the permitting process for the addition; 4. That, should the existing hedge along the east property line be damaged or destroyed during construction to the extent of reducing the opacity of the hedge by more than 25 percent, a six-foot high solid fence be installed and maintained along the east property line for privacy purposes (maximum of three feet high within the 25-foot front setback area); and 5. That the fmal design of the building, including window banding, be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted and the color of the dwelling be consistent throughout. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Nl- H. ~ Wells, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Application I IMS5c\PDS\Planning Department\C D BIStandard FlexlPending Casesl2 - Reviewed and PendingI09-18-03 DRCIEagle Estates Cir W 2959 - Finstad (LDR)IEagle 2959 Staff Report. doc- Page 60f6 . /,", Y) ~2_-- L. - I \ ';.~--:-'r' '~\ 1'.".~ ,i '-- ./1 - \ 1 -~-- I CASE #: i-.S ZQ{)-~ - oG03 DATE RECEIVED: ~ ,-I - 2..00 . RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: U't" ZONING DISTRICT: LDP- LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: JLS SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: >- rwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 o ~ 0~ o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION i"g o SUBMIT M'COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated. 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans AUG :I :-, ;filli o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00 ~t4 * NOTE: ~ TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Inlill Project (Revised 11/05/02) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME' -S e.. ~re(J -\- B.-n 1o('~Vl . F; '(") s \:o.-A MAILING ADDRESS: 2q Qt CS~+e' C~ rc1 Wes~ \ ) PHONE NUMBER: 7;)" 7-7~':6- ~7 a'i FAX NUMBER: 7a~-7:J!--t - ~"'Zl '-l '0 YV\ 'v;)y J V\ F i Y) 'b \- o...d. PROPERTY OWNER(S): J e. ~-r e-iet -\- (Must include ALl~ ners) AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202,A) z..CfSq tct()/e, c.s+cr/-es Cir~Je lUes/-. LDT 3% - EA(,Lf: eSTATES 2-.cD l\ % LuJ 2.3~3 ~l 001) )03 ~o 10 42-3 AU-LS J I <(, ~2 9. ~ .5"<",;;(.. ht-/. (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): I \2- E'S I Dr NT I A- L UN rT (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) STREET ADDRESS: ~~7 to , C/.r>Cl y t.pa/ey Ft... I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): . 7f)11<:. TrD n F- [~S f sid Ct."'" ot. I to f (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ~t. L-.v::;J Ski Ad~\~(t>f'\..~ "'" 1 01 6 -~'OX'b1' Stood"d o...'opm.ot.Appll"t1oo S'o.l. F,mllv ".(It 'Ofll~.i)'W'''' . . DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) , A PRYIOUSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 1 SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 2. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed ",e. 'fiff 1J.:.:,ID/MeA I ().hll &: C4</;?fIJUE.I'J Tb tor 38" r UhLL ;,0 ,MJ AA:j 1 flu; iiI ;Ao)1t. u ,c;;; r; Iy r/ At ,bh. 1. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. -r?h;- .#1"0 tI.f, ,{/rke.t iJ 7 Its,dk.J j(J t,- gl 'hL~....l"(H.-d,.. 1''' ( (l-['rR.""(L \.H'..:\\D H-A-uf" .3 C....:\. (;CH'.:..jeJ r Z. 5'1v((<.~. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. . I/" . /l / If -tllle/~ e.. <?rH' '?I ~7ce'l r /'I/;;:L e.....'I1~S o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain hID! each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. I ;v \ TI'h>L' T I~ AL TIC L f' 1\) "" {~ ., '_"I \,...:1 v , ~ c.\cl A(\dJt~...\c, I r;'i.'l f i.'jf . S ,~.r\H. I""U(.!tG( (" c.. '),v 11+e- Ik..l9Z. t\!\Fi] ., i: ;'{ Page 2 of 6 _ Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residenti,allnfill Project- City of Clearwater . 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) '7/; /J{ c,~ f L,lu cf {AU? /A.) '5'7"'4-'oU:: -rv/2E. +- {JU D\ 1.'Y.i II'lJ (f f'J i rs . 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. (J J \ f, 0 1\ J '5.' "'" (<L 0U,",1 J-h. ' N) Ht' 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. (LlG AIL /Vcr U~tf,'/rJi.t 17* f/Jr ,,;:: /"0(4'~' S;""f!: A.,.-IclmJ Sf2f. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. A j / /1 3 r..:) C' j / J J <"" c: /-I-c..Yrfl'1 ~,4/./ tT~ l/7cpt q ./q ,rT A.vt... Inuel.Ju it.... U)UI of IIu /',ll'Jt'.$~" h, /" 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. .---,.J...- r.. " I, / ",J 0'7 c ..7 U).t'le. I'- S O~ l.e [) r ~, J "'it tI e. h~ NA H, CJvJ"/""Ju. 61 f:j.I 1/ fI'j t ~or~ coe!. . 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. (Jill. E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: ~ APPROVED Existing topography exte.ndinfig .50 fdeeflt beyolnd at!1 proPfertyl1 lines; CITY Of CLEARWAltR TiQ<"'Jc ,,<:J,A'll.tV'I'7:l.' ~,.'? . Proposed grading including Inlshe oar e eva Ions 0 a structures; - All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; 'UBUe WORKS ADUlftlSTRA . ..,/...IL'; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet~c.. .' ~.[ ture; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; R.. <~ . ", . Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculati~" tI.", ~I r I III 1 .. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER ~IiD~{')~~t~"I':!tl'iiUI'flll) l?iiRMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable o o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable t l'1 -',; ()(j i.J.J Page 3 of 6 _ Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater . F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; /TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); ~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT as a licable" G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) :/' SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (\.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; rvdt4 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: T' I One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; - Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 4 of 6 _ Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater . u H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-110 CJ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom el Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers' Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including land sea Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, b pecies, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities 0 I existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ound cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or sha a and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development a Irrigation notes. A'I(J o oval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); REDUCED LANDSCAPE P to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); o CJ COMPREHENSI LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. I BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. CJ J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) CJ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs (j dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. CJ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provid etails including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing CJ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as ap' . ble (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) ( or), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) CJ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the a ptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition e Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exception this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ~ Sworn to and subscribed before me this" t?oay of , A.D. 20_ to e and/or by , who is personally known has produced ~ as identification. L.D L r- SJ..3- 431--& 'l-~1f~ -.0 YJ 9 Cf FC[)~ a.J....ooatif'-bPb-Ci.!3Jq,i/ 3/CS- , ~1~"1f ... EXPIRES: March 20, 2006 Bonded Thru Notar; Public UndelWriters t- City of Clearwater Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Applicati . . AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: "J0fat:y ( AMe.(~V\. +-\ t-JS~ (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ~ ~59 ~Ie.- f~4-e\.ks Gf2.c-IL Wt:sr _ G\ e~y-~~~V' 7=L 3~'7tol I 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) <"6' r)..0-t.'\-{ 0 n 0 ~ ~_o.. ~\-- c.. i ,\.JL. ,::~\oc,-c-L -61'0 lV) C"- c\ c~- 0.... 2- VI (~ s \0 r- ~ 0.. &&. \ -\--k) Yl ( /5 1-0 /()J + 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. P-lfiL~ Prope n STATE OF FLORIDA, 3/01 - jlo~ ~cfq - 3/0S' ~1 lfLO ~ day of who having been first duly SVlU)tR-. t:-z... D ,0 COUNTY OF PINELLAS t-,f; ot~-o{) d(tJ g- --Go6 -l5 FG&.?r~1 ~ 1-(1%--0 My Commission Expires: SUREKHA PAREKH :YE~~~~~~~~~h#2~D2:300 0I1ded Thru Notary Pub/' ' _""".::;--__ Ie Underwriters . -.........,.......,:~.:,... Al r~i~} ,,<,I) 1 '. S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslsingle family residential infill application 2002.doc '(.0,....., , I/!'''-''''(':, I , 'i'~ L Page 6 of 6 _ Aexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater . Jeffrey Ambryn Finstad 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Clearwater, Florida 33761 e SITE DATA TABLE Item Existing Proposed Land Area (Sq Ft) 18,428.8 18,428.8 Land Area (Acres) 0.423 0.423 Number of Units 1 1 Number of Parking Spaces 4 6 Living Area (SQ Ft) 2,815 4,343 Lanai (Sq Ft) 367 367 Entry (SQ Ft) 120 120 Garage Area (Sa Ft) 380 700 ^,! It 'j C' l"\dU! oJ JEFFREY FINSTAD 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West. Clearwater, Florida 33761 H: 727-723-8724 . C: 727-643-3638 . F: 727-724-8714 . jfinstad@tampabay.rr.com . . September 9,2003 RE: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West, Clearwater, FL 33761 Dear Development Review Committee, This letter is to address your questions regarding exterior wall material and color of addition. The exterior wall material will be stucco to match the existing home. We will be replacing the existing roof and this may facilitate a color change to the exterior of the house, but it will be a solid color with offsetting trim. Thank you, Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad ~ , L__ LlZl1 t l '1 (0) 1- - I E Ii ., .... ;; t- ~ In ..... g: .... I, . -w~ 1 .OJ' :l ",I? (" C' <. o;.~,1 ..... >.- 4..> . JJIJIJ5DV'J r';~'-( "FiJ/:!. 2.'ll~~, (.t (- -::;Ii 1- /067 ,- I- r~Ol Z 9 5 ~ [: A Gt u~~ & ~iT i\ll.::"<} I 'I r"l /' r: 11.\/) ',~I ;") /'~ ,I 47'4 17'1 'I - '''I 6' ", r" 24'3 "/ - 11'3 (=='} r . o~() > i ~ I I ~ +r '~, ,t ....':,~...,~1;'O = =;.:, I I I I ----:-= 0 I I 17'1 '? 6' J I 24'3 " r-- .... I I , ~ .. j I l L -.-- _. -._-~.... l BoJ OR EXERCISE '" I I ~ ' ~- CLOSET ~, ...-~..J BEDROOM I I .... D "i ] ......""1 I I C=:~~='-J [~-~:J ,l~" . I I -_____J I ~. -.=.---=:QI '-- _J ~ ~ I ,.--- I~) ~ ~. ~] J" I CLOSET +-' I ~ 5'S 3'6-' .44'2- LJ .... . . .. I ~\ ~b)(~ ~ --0 bJJ I ;:-:==-.) '-:C>~ ./t' -up - I ~;.J / ''"' ( -- LANDING " I--- -.. MEDIA MEDIA MIDDLE P ~TFORM MEDIA HIGH PLATFORM t---..' -_o- S- .D (~) LOWER .... PLATFORM - - .' ~~ 16'4 f- 3'6 9' .... 9' f- 9'6 I -- '--- r-Up-ll liO .... ... .~ .~ " - - --- ---- BEDROOM rrJI =D bIJ In L~~'~==J Ly LANDING I l"{,,L. L. 16'4 47'4 Ii J ' $" 1 , ;,1,< f.:: .... . ,",. :<t ~ ~ . In J j SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST PRCPARED FOR: BradllJY and HannlJlorlJ Finstad c/o Stephen G. Watts Challenge Mortgage 1301 $lJminollJ Blvd" SuitlJ 140 Largo, Florida '33770 CERTTAED TO: BradllJY Finstad and HannelarlJ Finstad and ' Notional City Mortgage Company and Commonwealth Land Tit/IJ Company and Kimpton, Burke, White and Heiden, P.A. DE'SCRIPTTON: Lot 38, EAGLE ESTATES according to the ' plot thereof os recorded in Plot Book 74, ~~o of the Public Records of Pinellas County, tf/di, ; ,I ,'> I ~ I I "7 ' .~ I I.....,. /.'\. ,.1 ( 'Ii POINT Of INTERSECTION FOUND TIN TAB t TALON DRIVE ~~, SCALE: l' - 30' I " -,- ", I I I I " t L_"'''' t -t ..." """ ,., . ,. ,J .., ~ :ll ~i ~~ ~ " " " t ,.......,.. I I I I L_ "'... '" S.I.R. ~ HR. - F.C.M. - FNO. - 'INo, - FL. . EL. - Rlw _ ~TYP.) : CONe. - S.I.R. #LB2D8 :r: I-- ::> o (/) W IN -J .- () ~~ I ~ W I ~ ~ . ~ r: .!-W...(/) ~vo w o W I~ ....J IX) C> z L5 " ,~ I " ~ . I I I ......." I SCREENED . ENCLOSURE ;~ " ~ "i .::! ~ ~ !i <- o u . ".,.. '''II ry I I I I 0( I .L.. ,,.. I " , , ,,-r I I t I ,,_ " f NOTE: THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT, SET TIN TAB RADIUS - 20.00' ARC - 31.42' CHORD - 28.28' C.B. - S.45'09'22'E. CONC. CURB SET TIN TAB ~I-- EAGLE I SURVEY LEGEND .. , , N.00.09'22''W_ 73.50' I ESTATES CIRCLE WEST I I ,,__ I I I I L... ,... I .- ., " I "....,.. I I I I ..._..., I ,. " " SET IRON ROD. SIB' FOUND IRON ROD, ~/B' FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT. 4',4~ FOUND NUMBER FLOOR ElEVATION RleHT -OF-WAY PROPERTY LINE TYPICAL CONCRETE flOOD ZONE NOTE: THIS SITE LIES WITHIN A F.E.M.A. FLOOD ZONE C ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 125139 0089 C, INDEX DATED MAY 6, 1999. SURVEYOR'S CER77F!CAf1:: I HF:RF:BY CEIWf'o' THAT A SURl/O' OF niE PROPF:RIY DESeRI8F:O HERF:ON WAS PER,W?Mt:D U.VDER MY SUPERVISION ON__jULY'29, ;999 AND THAr IT COMf>LIES WITH CHAPTER 61(;17..5, F.A.C. THE PROPERTY CONTAINS iMPROVF:MENTS AS SHOWN. TH~:f"CROACHM~NTS. - r"_,"_,.... ..~- FLORIDA LICENSED SURVrYoR .4oJp MAPpeR N". LS 1762 THIS SUR\IfY HOr: v.~(a WfTHrt7 :-r""-;. ~K;/~ RAISED SEAl. AND SIGNATtJR€ OF ~~~'S!D. SURVf:YOR AND J.lAPPER. P.C.-E. GONZALEZ ~ LLOVERAS BAUR & STEVENS ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNERS ILB 0000208 29228 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 N. CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 337el Phone: (813) 784-396~ Fox: (813) 784-8153 DRAWN BY: RM GOM CHECKED BY: RO APPROVED BY: DATE: JULY 29, 1999 SCALE: l' - 3D' ~ Vi ~ JOB No. ,S152699E BOUNDARY SURVEY . ~.~ p p~e) . . SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST PREPARED FOR: Bradley and Hannelore Finstad c/o Stephan G. Watts Challenge Mortgage 1301 Seminole Blvd., Suite 140 Largo. Florida 33770 CERnnED 70: Bradley Finstad and Hannelore Finstad and Nationol Cily Mortgage Company and Comman"'eallh Land Title Company and Kimpton. Burke, White and Heiden, P.A .,:,'" DESCRIP11ON: Lot 38. EAGLE ESTATES according to I"" plat ther",of 0$ recorded in Plot Book 74, poge -"0 of the Public Records of Pinel/os County, Florida. a o c:i w iN -.J - U ~~ I ~ W I II> I-- I )l <: ~~ ; f{l U} T 3 w -.J C> Z ~ }m ~,~ 8-___ . ~ RADVS - 20.00' ARC - 31.~2' CttOR(> - 2ll.2e' C.B. - S.-4S'09'22"E. .~ .~ . / ~S\ , ,,~ .. CONe. CURB C"t RQAOW ';f A...."CESS: El-SEutNl . <.~ L '...1: / SET n~ T..e J _ . . . . . \.. -I-Sf:! TlN TAS N.OO'09'22-W. \.. ....00.09'2..-,;, <s.oo::-:'Y I SET TlN TAB RADIUS = 45,00' ESTATES CIRCLE WEST ARC = 70.69' I L_ 0 T t) CHORD = 63.6-4' C.B. = N.4S"09'22"W. \ ~ IAI ON I nnJ\ Ir- 'f"'IL f UI\IVC. I ,...~ , t I' L_ "" , I " , ., -t ", , ,.... -r ....." (''''-".... -. "if Lt.) ~ .. ,.. (' 4~,JJ 11001"7\ D":/} ..~.' '\.'~'QO'0'9*~2"E:.j "', NOTE: THIS SURVEY W/lS PREPARED ~OUT THE BENEm OF A TITLE COMMITMENT. .1.5' ~I-- EAGLE I '. '" SURVEY LEGEND , ,.......,... I ., I L...... I .- -, S.lR. _ F.lR. - F.C..., - FMD. - I/No. lC FL - kL. . R/'ti - (lYl'.) : CONe. ~ SO IRON ROO. SIB- F'OllNO IIlON ftOO. ~/ll' roUND CDN:::Am ~""'. "-1[". - NUWllEJl 1'I.0<l't ELCw.TlON IlQHT--{)F-l<'~ PROP[RT'r liNE rtPlCIoL COtOlCTI: FLOOD 7nt!E: NOTE: THIS SiTE UES WITHIN A F.E-M.A. FLOOD ZONE C ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE t.1AP CO~(MU(!'7'(-PANEL NUMBER 125139 00B9 C INDE~: :)ATED !.lAY 6, 1999. ' ~PQj"T Of' '''I'EP,S~ F"OUND llN i_AS I 8 ::j ~~ sOU! :r: ..... :::> o (/) f ,.... '""'T- t , I , ..._~ . " ~~ SURVEYOR'S CERnFlCA TE: I HEREBY CERTIfY ~T A SURVEY OF mE PROPERrY DF3CR/Bffl HtREON If-lS P[RFORI.lE:D UNDER I.IY SUPCRVlSION ON Jvcr 29. 199.Q AND THAT If CC>>JPLIES WTlH O;APTER Me) 1-6. F.A.C. THE PROPERTY CONTAlNS ""PROVOIENTS ,'S SHOWN. I THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROAC"'-'ENr:5 ,~ - I ~. $IVIDY' UDYERAS \ F'LOR/~ L/CEf'lSED SUFrVF:YOR AND MAPPER No. __ "-- ~Z ~~f~ ~P}:;;:fK::~~~';:;:/~~/~_" .-:~. i __+'-'_1 ~ LLOVERAS BAUR & STEVENS , ENGiNEERS - SURI/E)'ORS - PI.AN~(RS ILa ??oo106 ztl2:za u.s. HQ1W,l..Y 19 H. c~~,,:rrR, F'\..O;::lo,s.. s.J76i Ph=n~: ce~JJ 7B~-3~fl5 DRAWN flY; ffw 100M CH[Cl((O 8'Y: ~ pc.-[ GONZALEZ , AP1""R'O\.'ID [r;: I DAT[: Ji.1LY 29. ~n9 I = 1" - .)0' ,ht. ) . . T2e/ISGQ 81111fJ '3 TOWNSHIP 28 SOuTH. RANGE 16 EAST 0E'SCRIPT10N: Lot J8. EAeLE eSTATES aCCOrding to (flB plot thereof os recorded in Plot Book 74, poge 40 of the Public Records of Pinel/os County. Florida. SECTION 20, PREPAReD FOR: BradlBY and HannBlorll r"'star/ c/o Stephitn c:.o: Wotb' Challenge Mortgage 1301 Seminal" 81w!.. Suite 140 Lorgo. Florida 3J770 CERT1F1ED 7D: Brodley Finstad and Hannelore Rnstad and NoCianol Ci9' Mortgage Compon.v and Commonweolth Land Title Company and Kimpton, Burke. White and He;den. P.A ~ TALON- DRIVE POIMr 01' Ih~ rOUN() ~ TAl! J- p.1 tI\ (; t>,t-'tC . ..., -'?"' I" . ... ,. I ~- ,..... -, ,.. ~~ SelLE: '''' " ,-: ~~ . ~........- t_ t..! : ::r:: to- ::) o b (/) o ci w I ('oJ .....J -- U ~~ , <<W r........ I ~ < w ~ --.: r: .. (J) CO l; W !.'J$ I~~ CO C) ;i ~ . ~...... . . J I 1.- ,... I << '" ~ c " . ....~ . NOTE": THIS SURVEY w. PREPARED THE BE TITlE SEr tIN TIl8 IlADIIIS - 2O.DO' ARC - Jl.U' CHORO - 28.2ll' C.8. - $.45'01"22'E. W '!f ACCESS [J.$EutN1 ---Q..I- - J _ 't:. N.OO.09'22-W. 73.5p' ~. EAGLE ESTATES CIRCLE WEST I , " --- ..... I ....... SURVEY LfOEND t_ '-.1: :) r. : . ,,-r I 'I. '-- ,.. . ,. t} S.LR. _ F.LR. - r.c.... - FNll. - I/Ho. c n. . EL. . 0/'11 - rn....) : tK: so _ 110O. 5/1" f'OUNO _ llOO. ~/8' f'OUNO CllNCllIJ[ UOOoUllI;HT. ~- ... fOUNIl IlUYllER I'\.OOll (l.EllO.lloH _r-oF-.....v I'AOPElm LIHE l"tPICOL alNCRCI1: FlOOD mNE" NOn:: THIS SITE UES WITHIN A F.E.LlA flOOD ZONE C ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP CO~{M:.J;'J!TY-PAN[L NUMBER 125139 0089 C. INOEl( :.JA'TED I.IAY 6, 1999. SURVEYOR'S CERnFlCATE: I HEREBY CERrl1'\' 7H4T '" SClRIfY OF THE: PROPERTY DESCRtIKD HCRCON 1I'-4S PUlrDmlaJ UNDER UY SUPf:RVISION ON JULY 29, 199.9 .!IUO THAT IT COWPUES WTTH ClIAPIUl 61(;/ '-6. F.A.C. THE: PROpeRTY CONTAINS /IJPROlIFJIE/ffS .'05 SHOWl\!. m~ I1SI8LE_fl>'CROACH/.<CNr.5. ~- SANOY" L1.0\IfRAS FLORIDA LICENSED SURm'OR ANl) IMPPCR No, l.S '!!!! !_~_'!!'~_YAlJt:!. rrItfHO(J'f 'tHE" ~ R;;.':;(:; :.: ~. ~ LLOVERAS BAUR &. STEVENS ENGINEERS - SUil\IEYORS - PlNlNEI!S 'L8 ??oo208 29228 v.s. HIGHW"y 19 N. Clr.A.RWI.:ra. F'"\.O:~ 337M Ph....: (e~3) '8~-3;85 F'o-t:. (1113) 7&4-11153 llIlAWN B": /1101 OOM Joe No. CH(OCrn BY: '!9 -I S152699E 1 APfl"RaVm DY: llA1E'_.JtJlY 29. 1999 " ~~ ,.. . ~ " " Ii ,,-. " ~,\JA, ' ',1 h ,4 . \j., [i! ill 9 2003 1 41/01 ------1---- 31/01 CHI CHI RODRIGUEZ GOLF COURSE o CITY OWNED Pfi'OP[RTY 4709-1177 ~!~- '~:~):.'.,. "'. " .".....H:. S~((ve:'i IS S /'-'Oi-,) I Vt,fj veck<c..e J ~ tJe ~e'~~s "-'eAf~.~~. {.;- - /0 .{'eet. ~ 5811-20" EAGLE UB ?P.C 11ft.. 'H. .. ~ ~I .~ ~ a; tl :!: ':i <( \Q ~ 8 ~ l'i o 0; J " ~ S ~ o <( o o 5 s z c; ~ iJi CITY OF CLEARWATER AIID VICINITY PIIlBILAS COUIITT. FLORIDA PREPAAED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADIIINISTRATlON ENCINEERINC 100 S. N)fUe "...., et.or..ot.... rL 33158 Pro.: (1113)5&2-4750. for.: (813)52&-4755 Mtp: Ilwww,cltorWGt...-fLcom/fiIqln..,/ Dlsclaim.r: Public In1ormotton dolo Is fOrnlsned by lh. City or CltorWCIl., Publk: Wor"s Adtnlnlstrotlon!En91t1..-rnq. and mu.t be ace.pled ond uud bV the ,.clolenl with the LIIu:Ser.tondn9 thot the doto reulwtd WOI calte-cted for the pUlpaR 0' dnelop1nq (I qroptdc Infrastructur. InwntOl)'. "'. WJctl. the City of CleotWCII., PWA/E mOk.. no WO'"roI'lU." '"~I".-<l or implied. conc.mln9 tn. accuracy. CCIf'f'lPIeienn.. rdloblllty. Of suitability or thl. doto (or any other patlleulor uu. F"urlh<<more, (he City o( Cleorwtdter PWA/E o.sum" no lIobillty whotsoewr ossocioted w1tt! the use or mlsuse or such doto. IjgIf.: This Atlo. poqe 1. ~bjPet to periodic: ct'oanqn. r Qf Inf'ormatlo" atIout lolest t"",lslOtIs pleoR coli PWA./t or ...islt Out Writ site. . N EB 100 200 400 600 I I I I SCALE: 1" = 400' LEGEND: '" 9 )> ~ @ BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ApDRESS CI TY liMITS LINE EEEJ ~~~~I~ ~~~R;A~~~P~~~Y LIMITS . AGREEMENT TO ANNEX . CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION . - ZONE liNE flUc>>lt 0A'Cl [!]qtJ 08/li/ft ZONING ATLAS . 2008 SE 1/4 OF SECTION 20 - 28 S - 16 E 9-<\ ~~ ",.( ()..\ 0 \ ro '6. /6~, . :rw:y S~:;~~::~ _ :: .s recor=':"~t @ BOOk 74, pages 40 , 41. public records of Pine11as County. Florida. N!!l -I t1 ~:UUi PREPARED EXCLUSIVELY FORa Gary M. Catenac Corp.r John H. HALEY, jr. ~o.,. 38 ~ I~ ......OO.O~4t7-W /"'8.5d- PII <I. . 01 - I I ol~ ~ ) '\ i ~ 11 · 144,,, !\ 84 , ~ , . 'IIJ' "" iI IJ~\ . So"'. \ ,,- ~~\' : ~ 1>"- \~ : '1s'\~~ ,,--~.1 ,~ ...~ rc:.#/. ~.~tIW7'~, ~.... .......... 0 L , ~.--.., ~&~~. I ,)' ~1 I .",." I p.II' -...- -PI ~: / .I ,. <J TALON DRIVE ,,1 ~ A. ~~""rr ".. #OO.O,:r6"'W ~: .1;/ . if"?' //4.~- NOTI. NOT vA&.tO WITHOUT AN EMBOSSED SURVIYOR'S SIAL \: W -It- · UZ ~ ~~ ~ UV) <II( CJ)bJ WV) )J ~~ ~ ~U , CJ)~ t w,.. W~ '" -I 0 "( (!) <II( <(~ UJ ~~., 91."" ~~c <J " i.fy'-) tOT 39 . i. (&. <J, <J ~ c-: " , a ~~ , I' J:"" . \ ~ ~ bf,. . . ~I' .' ~ ~ ,..11 f ~ ....J'A.,} E,.I-. ~ ~~.~'~ i ~8P'tP I . "fi';. L~.. bJ'!'~ 1'3. 7 1..' ~ if ....... '~ft ~ ~ ,.~ . ~ .I~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~;: \~ ~1/f~ 8""1/.,*0 &:>1.011 (113) 937.Z0S3 ~ .&11 ~" LAJCDSURftYDtG ~ c, ~.u.. P.L.S. I he,*, certify !Nt ltIe """' repteMftlecl herlOft __ Itte ,lQVIremenlI ~ FIOIid8 AclrINIlIII,lItve Code. eA ~~ 1 c. ..,.. AMM ate ,...... "....... l-rw .... "" r.o. 1Soll1232. Tarpon Sprtngs. n 34688 Pllly ell"': "",II AIV.Nd Orewn By: IiH . . :Jq~t. EatfI~ E.twtre- Co'f- c.....J ""-':Z-'I71 BOUNDARY SURVEY LOT 4, EAGLE ESTATES PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ". PREPARED FOIl F'LAIII HOIIEI. INC. " "'1 . - . N . ... '0 ... 0 iii iii I: . Z 0 i= Q a c .. ItI c N = ... " 0 0 b g 0 . . 0 0 ~ Z II: C 2 Q Z C ..I LOT S L Description: Lot 4. aap or plat entitled EAGLB ES'rA'l"ES. ., reeotdell in ,l.t Book 74. pages 40 and 41 of the Public Recor41 of p1nel1&. County, Florida. This Lot lies in Flood ZOne .C. per Flood I~..nc. Ilate H.p, .C~nity Panel No. 125096 0006 B. panel not Mlnt"', National Flood Insurance Progr_. Federal l'aergency """-'''''' AqelW', Elevations referenced to IIGVD of 1929. Mean II.. lA'I.l . IhOO'. AI' 19 20UJ J ------------ - -- ---------_...__..~ .------ MICHAEL BAKER ASSOCIATES LAND $11IWEYOR$ tI.tI PLANNERI 17 EAST TARPON AVENUe TARPON SPRINGS. FLORIDA 14'" 11131 n.. SOil UIII .... fl'- . .. '. DATE" ./15/.7 121221.7 FORM TIE IN DRAW~ BY' J K t '.8. 116 NOTE',COPIES 01 THIS MAP HOT BEAIlING THI SURVEYOR'S EII80SSED SE:AL ARE NOT VAUD. LllI'fDA REa HI. 4011 SCALEI ,.. 30' I HEREBY "It,," fMAY' TlfI_ATTACHED llelTCH tW SURV EY IS. 'I" .... co.U.df TO THI IllY' fW 0UIl ICNOWLEDR lILlI' &NO 'HAT THERI Alii 110 ENCIlOACltII' ..... FEM1RION AND IT MEETS TH' _ltlMvlll ,""II AL ITAHDAROI saT fOItTH IV Tit' P\.A. ,'AT' fW LAND IUIlVPOllS. CkD. IYI PG. 70 1flb {oJo(\ . :1 '.... t j f ;. ,. ~ ~ t" {'H' '.. . ,.,.... .""0. a- SCAU':/~SO' y ", \ ,I i . ; ': 1 ~ t t/ ! lO.T 37 :8.U I LC;'.:,.:; Dr:: C)T Clf':' C'f)' T '..-:t~ ',. ,~.". ~ ..... ~ '.\, . . .. H 00- (II' 22"W I()f). ()(l I . I J..OT 35' lOT 40 ~T UJT 412 ~ ~ l , :lVALI.Ff eVilS . Certified to Rutenberg-Jaghab. Ltd.. Dr. William E. & Elaine C. Weber & Home Federal Bank . RWisriJ' '.5-I4-8S: ADQID ~ ~c:tW BE~A"NJM "..lrIY CDTIn THAT THIIUltYlY' CERTIFIED FOR FOUNDATION ItUIlIINTID HIIICON IIIIT.I THI ' TIE IN lIOUtII..INT. OF CHAPTU II HH-I '), .; NNlIDA AD.......TRATIVI CODe ; C A.;/ ,p.,4.J. ~. . j (;.. (Jl..( e/''''~ 4""- KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers · Surveyors l-OT 4' EA6LE ESTATES. PJAT 8()()K 7-4. PAG.E"S 410 i ~ I OIAlrJJAt! /~I~JJ-rV r~"o.nA Alli' '1' U ']nn . p. "I . <7 f11l.) ttRTlflED FOR ~IN~, L ~ ~If{~' ~~ Ut 105, ~ U. S. 19 North Cllarwattr. FIartda 33el5 (83) 785.2556 d- '1 01 I a../e> Il fi~.r,. ..vA1n"tM'WI'.. ~A64 G~ "'~, rQl4' JELWe-4".r. /N~. ~1W"'AlVW~em ~ ..wSv-f'.IM'"6" ~~''''NY 8,UN .$'. Ak.0 Y.4N......P.rA ~. ,WeK.r C( R hill 0 '01 . N ~ ~ ~ ~ 1t1r'~ Ai ".St1:r""1'o , i.4" (rYNt'h) a ~ " <<', ) __.. ---Cl1 \ 1:1.9' i .. \ II ~ },"I'IA/ I INN..,,' ,. ,'1)kI ~ x / \ / \ / \ I \ , .fI' \ ~ ~ /1>,. ~~ - t , ~ ~ Q ~ ~.'- 'I'" ,M. REVIEWED ANI) ACCEPT!:U nv: ~ft yr" ~~41~' -A-- ~~~."z~ 1.P. J'a-;: R~..&.[. {~, 31 I' F'ROJ[o;I NUM8[R "O?-2.riHJ u, 3P . A "'., '"''''II R- ~f!~ _~S':'l~.r t'/"'!(,'~_4_ _.. ___ lONINO ~Iol 'I Buaio::aA~, ~i ::;"'R.';;:""- 3iI' ~J ""~ REAR ! :1'& '::::1' <<', " 111./1 . Z .I"" ",1-1 *IMfI " :' (H(~ I I .. "" ... ~ '~ ".' I'i~ '~IJ ",,',fo<<:lt,IJ .",-,,.).. -.. ,~ '1 II r 7' t;;.:.~ f'~'">> ~; Ulr ." ~ 22 t;z Yfb ~cn ..__..tft-~. tlPr ~# ...,.." "'.......... ~ ~ I~~ " to,~. 1.'1 . A'lf' · q 2001 I FI,t'r f' J.iO 1 u J \,)~:~~t) -----.--..- -"- '. '. II l~ tn LOI(S) ~e , "C1CIA-=-__,---":"€.~~{1 . ~-r.!'~~~.E.::""'.___. ___.._____ AS RlCOllO[D .. I'LA' ~ PAGI:(S) <(" :'411 ,U' IIIl 1'1.""; "fl:URI~ CK___.et~~~(.n__CWNIY, FLORlUA. I. 'ClO.-. _ _ "'''D .... lie ._HIII$MM'r' ';W~ ~ ~tMfJ..~"II'#fItr'.R!. ~.f!!!~~~~oJl.f!t1.tI"#I-.I. 0;-/" J. NOI V4lU>> .ltlClll' ltC _I\C At.. nIL ...._ N_" 'IlAl." A 'L......A L.:tNtllt "1ft\fltJII ANI' "",,"II J. NO IIICAYA1lCIII -. PUW'ClMCO 10 Ill...." lie LUCAI.... l" 1I""(N(( " NtY UNIIIllCIIlUI_ lHCIlOAaMHI" ~....'n.. "llUCI"'lU 011 'OUllOA'1OHS. .. Ill-VII 01 '"" sunc'I ,lilt ""III'OSlS 0...11 IIINt .'1ll1 II WAS ..IIIlll(O, ."IlIUI .lI1N 1Il.IeA'.... M.l. . AlII. lII-utIllS SQ.I RlSIC _ .IHOUI UAatlY 10 1tC UW-. NOll_ IClION "AIL III 1~If'i'llUlO IU UlIIl NtY llIlIIIS Ull _"UIII 10 Nt'1lIC 01..11 "WI lHOK CIllI.CD 10. S. AI. nue l'OINlS AM _lll U1USS 011.__ Nil 1111. .. lMS UWY IS NO' IflblDlD 10 SlIOW IIC LOCAllIlN Ull llllS llHCl 01 NtY .aIlllSlllCIlllHAL. IIAZAIlOOUS OR lNIIlllOIMNIAI. Y sultnr,. MUS. g ,. K-,I.Il_4"'UIIS_1O. If flOOD lOIjf 1_",ACr.1lIIlIING 10 lIC fl.II"" lIellGt:HeY UAlU.CllIllNI AGlHeY. FlOOD ....MCI IIAlr IIAP, CllUUUNIlY 'ANn NUUl(II i ~~-b . OAKII(dU'h"-8, ""AAK ASSOCIAIIS. INC., PllOWlC. ""lNFlIIlIoIAllOH A' A COUIIIlIY ONLY. I'ClLAlllS ASIOClAIlS, INC. - .. -- UW_ ICll(ClIl AISlYl' NO UAa.II" ,CJll he ACCUllACl' f'I 11ft ZUIC DlII-.'1ClIl. lie l'llI'Alllll f1f 1tC IIAP, H FlDlIIAL IloIlllCCNCY ..........., AGOIC", 011 .. LOCAl. GO\l[lltMN1"" AIlIIHeY HAWtO MIlSDICllCl1l eMII SUCH MAfllllS SltCUl.O . CClIl'ACtrO PllIClll 10 ,.,.., .AlDG[IoClflS IlJNO MAOr FIlCII HI 1IF0000fICllI. .. AIO\C Il[J'[Jl[H((O IIAP SlAIlS .. lIC, HOIlS 10 1I1E utrlt lHA' '".. IIAP II FOIl IfSUllANCl """DSl' ONL"', .. UNLISS 0...... INIllCAtrD. lHr I'llCftlllY ....- /lItO IASlloCNlS SllOllH Mill FUllHISHID 10 I'ClLAllII AISOCIAltS. INC. Me Me I'IlIIUU[D '0. COllIlICl. HO KAllCH 01 AllY PUatC "COllIII. FUll rAK......I" DlIQS, rre., WAS I'IllFOIIIoCD IY ha, flllU FCJll IIC C:OWU_ 01 '"" ~Y. .. nPA1IClIlI (IF _ICll(ClIl) AlII ....0 ClIl__-P/A IIAWtO Nt IUVA_ OI-H&!.-IIA_AL GlODIfIC V111llCAL OAlUU, 1t2t. 10. '"" ~, WAS ......AIlID .!HOUI lie KlIUII .. AI, AllSfllACI 16 IIILl IlHlI MAY . ~CI '0 IA.IIl"I" IlIS1RlClIOHS. llIOIlS-OI-WAY AND OfICII MA"PS 01 ..~. A . llIlC U..... '0'. 1'110 __10 0. MI~ 'N. ,.......... 1fI). III11Ul ;- : =:..... :.._ : :~~ nHIII"" -. ~~.. D: ICIl......... -,..-.., :,.. : ::::'ar WA' ! - . _~A"O "W, . IA....OI 'I . r::.:;.:;o=:w - ..lIt.. ..., :t.r _ _ _ II ..., ~ ~ : =.:"::. 'IIIUCUlI .'1., . 1::..'1:."~~r ~- 0.1IIf1~ ~~,: ~~~..- \,~ : n:., _ DI.. ......, u: : =.~~.. I:' ~:::: ='~":i::I~"'""-IOllll_' ~'::~ : ~':.i.::__ :,..: ::' ~ : =~..AD ::. := ~~::. t"'~:'.JII:J, ~: ~l'.r_~". DI'l,...... ~~ : :::"I=-- D IICII"" <<Ill"., I"A' ItIC Sll."'., Il(l'tOt'$(lfllll Itfllfnll 11('." II. nPF or SURIIE Y 1>... IE POLAR'S teCHNICAL "ANDAlIOS $11 '01111' It. 1111: 'UJR",A 110""" to" __.__ II'lIOIUSIClHAl. LAND _'C'OII$ If 0...,.1111 '''''7 - ". BOUNIlARY -6'~"l AS SOCIA /u INC. nOlltOA AOWlISIIIAII'C C(lII[, -~ PROFeSSIONAL SUR'iF~NG l>UllSU,.,.I 10 S1CIION r/1;. ~ u~ .~~ 5/0 SOUII' LA/(( DRI~ SUlI( A 1.72021 'LOIltOA SfAlUIlS '.....-<<'-n""..__ el( MIIA/(R, flORIDA J4d1/1 '.INIH ~. F.l';r..t''''~ . . AlJG ~ \..} 'I'i'" 1.;. LI. t:J 1-,-\e:f T~or-.J 1VC= ~ N :seMI: 1~IO' p 1.D.T~ 1.0T 52. NOO. Of'22" /f)f).()()' lOT 01 )..OT 45' LOT <1-1 J,J)T..., . ce' J()(). 00 . Certified to Rutenberg-JIghlb, Ltd. ~ , \. ClRTI"ED POI "NA&. SURVEY ; B8Y J. GOODMAN fLORIDA REGISTERED SURVEYOR No.40~~ I", f ",- ORAWNBV: M.I!CHECKmBV: .~-, FLOOD HAZARD ZONE C PANEL NO~ 125096 oo2B DATE REVISED Not Printed 2q~7 C)r Lu _ ._If" AW'/~"- 1#1/#/ ~ - ... . . ~,.. . ~~ ~~ ~~ ~O\ ~ ~ . . AUG 1 9 LUU3 Poundation SURVEY ORDER NO. 50065 SEC. It} . lWP. 18 SJWG. /~ PlNEUAS COUNTY. FLORIDA E. N 4 , . ~I , . .. ~~ : ~I)T' I ~! ~ ~i .M' .. ~ ""1S.7S. S8!r.RJ~8-~ G · 7bt~ : A.!,1/',,"r.JJe!jse. 3u?~,,~~. CL,. I Pt.-. 33S'1 ~~: .$4~~~Ud-. ,"".,J,.~~ o\Nf~ (:4,/ Pt-.JJ$lf SURVEY OF Lot 5, Eagle Estates - AS RECORDEtI IN PlAT BOOK 74 PUBlIC RECORDS OF Pinellas '''d~4" &.sr"r~s &/HC~E ,SOt/TN PAGE 40 & 41 COUNTY, FLORIDA THIS SURVEY FOR AND AT THE INSTANCE OF: Arthur Johannessanl Inc. ROBERT A. MPBELL RLS FLORIDA RE TAATlOH NO. 1082 .,~ . D...~~If~ CAMPBELL CONSULTANTS, INC. LAND SURVEYORS · .118 -122nd AV!!. NO.-CLEARWATER. FLORIDA - PHONE (113)57"'" DATE OF SURVEY March 18. 198'i 4) " here,?y certity that the survey Represented hereon meets the requirements ot Ch. 21.HH6 FA-C. .' :'"""c~\ i'll ,-"/),,., ~.:"i{~tf:~\~.;' ~". .. ., 'ef '.~:.>;~;:;.~~;_';;~k_ ~;-:' t.-'; A"G' L 19 ')['1(' L !uJ ',;-' ,A,-,'x~. ""',...-.... ,_,_J {i.' ;.~ .' :. '. . . -,. PREPARED FOR: AP';:ll- HOM~~ SEe. ,~ lWP. ~ RGE. ~ ~ E'AGC.e. ESTA~~ GI~"E. N~ '- N~~' K.c. - '605.0 '- . .......,...., .....~ ......oI"'.,...T . .': ') ... ... ".... iT NM.~'~e. IIS.O ~ . .... ..... " .. . J rI"'*' . G - - zt.~t. ... l\ , . i f,<1 .....-... ~~4' <( ~ 4';v ... .. 1 . ....;,'" lit ,,'Art ~ :l - f f7,~5 b '2 ~~ flll ~ I ~~I ~! 3 .~ /I I Q =-, /.\ ~~ ... )of. '1 4b 0 4~ .J cI- ~ No ~ ~.~. -6- vi l""'~) -" AUG 1 9 .LUU3 o I>DIcrrC!. ~ -~. ""I'fP'K. ~s ~w,.J. ,..-, ~s &JCasr.",C':a f!UItVATloN. Lor 4~ -t 1!A<:a&.e: e.s.TA T~ ~ RECORDED IN PlAT BOOK .:&... , PAGE 40,4-1 , OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF PlNElLAS COUNTY, flORIDA. BOOK PG. OWN. BY: IC- INY. NO.~"'C. I HEREBY CERnFY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF C~ER 21 HH-6, OF THE flORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. DATE: 8-0 - EVANS LAND SURVEYING 1780 MAIN STREET - UNIT 0 DUNEDIN tFLORIDA 33528 PH: 734 -3821 : PLoT PLAt-J \:))tr~N.~ ~ Ro. Reg. No. 2937 AUG 1 U LUU:1 '" ~~.~~K..,~., '^'t~~70~~~'~~~~::;.':~ HAMEr ,';.;:,:.". ~~iilf~!~~l>~A.5J~;L~~;,,; ~ 8 ~ r-::-" - Scali I- - ZOo ,~ ";"\ ."-~:: r < "j,," :. :~:'>,~;:;/~;.> 7l. ~ 1ED~~ .~MatolT ClG 10 \! ....'?T58/..' ~JY~ . -::::r- " ~Q.. c, y r c,Jr"tE ~.S . ~ '\ 1 > c.: -u ' - " iii In ,tg.(,. 2(,.0. ~II' Cone. r: 0 IZ.(,' 7.'/'1'\ ~ M lit .. Z5,:!' /2.) .~.r; i) ". '~8S 'AI. 'l.8 9,IilJUtl2,l,213.4 ~ ~7 i i - o IP l' STY c /3 S V~. 3#.r.Cc,'.srr~c..n"'" i i ~ .., I~.~. 1'$,0 ..;. en lit S ~ . ~ "'"2 ~ '" '.,.. N " Z8,7 . .. ~i i < 3~ \ '8_ P8 41 '00,00' <<Le.. A SlRVEY OF LOT '!.W ....... ~LB e~T""'TB~ AS RECORDED IN PLAT 8OO1C~PAGES<40t41 OF THE PUklC RECORDS OF puJSL.LA.s. COUNTY.FLORIDA The Surwr ...."-.Iwt .... .... IIlI ........ 01 IIlI ........ ~ SIandardI fer lint ~ .. .. StI* 01 FbldI ,. QlIIpIIr 2t Htt -I. F.AC. ~ 6oo-o~.z.o 0.11 Let ,.....,. Z. JULY b5 1II:ll?. CERnFlED AS 1'0 SURYE1 l-!:!:.~ooo 'tete ., n.u. 0... ... ~~O. CIoul IIIyo -I" 28A-,~T 8S' !!!It. -4D:=::::=.:mltZADA.JNc. '.""""'___0.0..-._ US" .....--......_1- ......_1_ . 5 ~q.50 ~Ni(.4 esrRT4$ C.A..W, A& . t'V ~..C\.. \ ..fE4::: ~(;1, TWR24 $., RNtJ /(/$ E. ~ ~ "8 ,. . 'D" AI. ""40'.11"1. ,Nt ,.- , All" I."(J."~'I"I., :1.M AI~ II~, I " " t " , W ~ A SURVEY OF: Lot 6, EAGLE ESTATES, IS recorded fn Pllt 800k 74, Pag.s 40 . 41, Publfc Records of Pfnenls County. Florfda. , Pfn,llas County ~~ . Florida tt~~\1 ~\~ ~ .. l ~ 8 . ~ ~ For/To: Flafr HClIIlIS 8y: Joe Kfrby ....T "1I'4-~1C,. Ord.r No. Dl1/37576 June 23, 1_-sth Slptelber 241A!986-l~ut bldg/s.t f.f. elev.. October I, lHO-plot plan t NO' VALID IIIISS IMIOSSID wmt A SIAl _Sf_IS III NOTE: THIS sum, MAS '.E'AlED MITHOur TN( '"EflT OF A TITLE 5URl':H. fit. 6_ ~IM' ""uI ~(Jt:"",..~ dne. It PI.,...,.. tIlDIClN 0CAl.A ZUtmH.LI ~~ PLOIlIDA IINOIH...... RKG'N. NO. ~ " '" '" " '" " '" '" '" ,- '" '" '" " Basis of 8.nc~rk: Desfgnatfon:-----RI-15 - City of Cl.arNIt,r El,vation: 87,74 Mean Sea Level: 0.00 7 -I hereby certffy that thfl surv.y WlI ..de in acco...~wtth the .tnf_ ltandard c1tun requf....ntl for land tttl. aurv.,1 Jointly .Ita tshtcl and_tad by the I Florfda DepartlHnt of legulatfons. Ioarcl of Land Su""l . Chaptar 21 11I-1 of . Florfda Mlinfstratfv. Code .ffecttve October 1. lMl. . , ...,'....411:- C~ ~ I-- . . From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 30,200311 :22 AM To: 'mmarkham@tampabay.rr.com'; karen@jadon.com Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi; Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank Subject: FLS2003-08038, 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West To: Mike and Stefanie Markham John and Karen Sullivan The Planning Department has analyzed the Flexible Standard application listed above. A copy of the staff report is attached for your information. Your comments and concerns have been reviewed as part of the analysis and, where appropriate, conditions have been added. The Planning Department has approved the application, with conditions, and a copy of the Development Order is also attached. A signed copy of the Development Order is being mailed to each of you. In accordance with Section 4-502.A, an appeal may be initiated by either of you (or both) within seven days of the date of the Development Order (deadline to appeal is by 4:30 pm on November 4,2003). Should either (or both) of you file an appeal, which will then be scheduled to be heard by the Community Development Board (COB), such filing of the appeal will stay the effect of this decision, pending the final determination by the COB. There is an appeal application form available from the Planning Department should you plan to appeal, and the fee is $100. The appeal must provide the justification to overturn the decision of the Planning Department. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 562-4504 or by email. Wayne Wells, AICP Senior Planner ~ ~ Eagle 2959 Staff Eagle 2959 Report.doc ;!velopment Order.d 'E It\\. \.',+ ~ ( I ,~.) . . Page 1 of2 Wells, Wayne From: markham [mmarkham@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 200310:57 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: markham; Mike C. Markham Subject: Re: FLS2003-08038 - Flexible Standard Development Approval Please accept this e-mail as an objection to the above-referenced application. Please contact me immediately at my office 461-1818 or on my cell phone 480-5118 if my attendance at the September 18 meeting is appropriate or necessary. These comments are in addition to my e-mail to you dated September 9,2003. 1. After review of every house in the neighborhood, we do not believe the requested approval, if granted, would be consistent with the homes in Eagle Estates. The applicants wish to increase the square footage of their home by 1500 square feet (from 3124 to 4624). Such a size increase is inconsistent with the entire neighborhood, the internal lots and the corner lots. My information is taken from the Property Appraiser's web site. There are 56 homes in Eagles Estates - 32 external lots that border the surrounding golf course; 23 internal lots (like the subject);and 2972 Eagle Estates Circle East (which is actually 4 lots). The home at 2972 is 7499 square feet and has been excluded from my analysis as extraordinary. The average size of an external lot is 3515 square feet. The average size of an internal lot is 3189, The average for all lots is 3378. Only 8 lots in Eagle Estates exceed 4000 square feet; none of which are internal lots. Not surprisingly, 4 of the 8 are located on pie-shaped lots in the outer corners of the neighborhood (lots 7,19,24 and 33). The largest internal lot home is 3834 square feet. If approved, the applicant would have the 4th largest home in the neighborhood. The applicant's home would dwarf the adjacent homes (lots 37, 39 and 40). In short, it will be a monstrosity on a smaller corner lot located only 10 feet from our rear property line. 2. We understand that the applicant has submitted various surveys to support the request for a 10 foot "side" setback. While the City might consider it a "side" setback, it's a rear setback to our property. If granted, a two- story wall will be only 10 feet from our rear property line and directly facing/overlooking our back yard, potential pool area and screened lanai. There are only 8 lots in Eagle Estates that are similar to ours and the subject (lots 38, 39, 34, 43, 44, 53, 48 and 49). None of those lots has a rear setback of less than 20 feet (consistent with our deed restrictions). None of those lots has a second story wall only 10 feet from their neighbor's property line. The most recently constructed home (lot 44) in Eagle Estates has no second story at the back of the home and is set back 20 feet. Our property and its value will be adversely affected if the application is granted. 3. The last house constructed in Eagle Estates (lot 44) is a corner lot similar to the applicant. The rear of the house is 20 feet from the rear property line. When the house was constructed, there were major issues with runoff and soil movement. At that location, there is a short retention wall to protect the neighboring property owner from the impact. We too have concerns about runoff, flooding and soil movement. Simple inspection of the property line reveals that our property will be impacted by new construction only 10 feet away. Our back yard could become a regular flood area, The homes along the western border of Eagle Estates (across the street from the applicant) have had flooding problems and many have installed French drains along the property lines. We requested the applicant to insure us that he would handle any flooding issues created by his construction. He refused to do so stating the the City had required special gutters and that was sufficient. The applicant's current home is basically touching the setbacks on all sides now and has a circular driveway. After adding 10 more feet of garage and driveway (adjacent to our property), the applicant's property will certainly have the least amount of impervious surface area in the entire neighborhood. 4. We have serious safety concerns for our small children (7 and 10). A two-story construction site only 10 feet away with no fencing will be an attractive nuisance. For that matter, a typical wind could easily blow construction material to the location of my children's swing set. There are pictures in your file that show the proximity of the swing set. 5. We requested the applicant to agree to keep and maintain the current hedge both during and after construction. He is not willing to permanently keep and maintain the hedge. As you know, there is no fence and some day soon there may be no hedge - I suspect it would be destroyed by f~~\,ter !::u Iffi 9118/2003 ~ - JR)' . . Page 2 of2 base. In the 10 foot area between the new construction and the property line will be two NC units, a side door with a light, and trash can area - separated only by an uncertain hedge. Our screened lanai directly faces this area. With the new driveway addition, headlights will regularly shine into our lanai and the back of our home. Our master bedroom and daughter's bedroom face that same area, There are issues of noise, lights and odor. I don't know how to solve these problems short of denying the application. None of the 8 similar corner lots has similar characteristics of this type. Again, our property and its value will be adversely impacted. 6, Eagle Estates is a mature neighborhood where construction of this type has not occurred. To my knowledge, no similar request has ever been made or granted, If granted for this particular lot, it could become precedent for all lots and potentially change the current landscape of the neighborhood forever. Respectfully, the City should deny the application. Thank you for your consideration. We have studied this issue carefully and discussed the application with our neighbors at length. We are happy to meet with the committee to elaborate. Michael and Stefanie Markham 2960 Talon Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 (727) 796-5076 m1J1arkham@tamgabay.rr.com 9/18/2003 . . Wells, Wayne From: JohnL612@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 9:25 PM To: wayne.wells@clearwater-f1.com Cc: karen@jadon.com Subject: 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West Dear Wayne, We live at 2970 Eagle Trail in the Eagle Estates subdivision in Clearwater. Recently, we received a notice informing US that our neighbors at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West (FLS200308038) had applied for flexible standard development approval, requesting a ten foot setback on the east side of their property. We are very much opposed to this request for many reasons: (1) We have lived in this subdivision for sixteen years now, and have seen many owners apply for variances. These were denied time and time again over the years, so that the true integrity of the neighborhood would always be maintained. In fact, I, Karen Sullivan, was the real estate agent of record when this property was sold to the developers back in the 1980' s. It is very important for you to know that the developers spent many long days with their attorneys to develop strict deed restrictions so as to maintain a consistency in the neighborhood with house sizes, setbacks etc. which would protect 011 future homeowners. These restrictions/setbacks are important to all of us. Owners should not be allowed to deviate from them, as they help maintain the privacy, value and character of this neighborhood. Allowing a variation from a setback would truly be a mistake and create an eyesore among us. The proposed size and location of this particular home would be overwhelming for this corner lot.. .too big of a house on too small of a lot with fewer feet between the homes. It makes no sense whatsoever......The neighbors to the rear of this property (Markham) would be most adversely affected if you grant this request because the houses would be much too close and the value of their home would decline greatly. (2) If you do grant this variance, it will open the flood gates for other owners to approach you and ask for similar variances to side, front or rear setbacks and possibly,even height restrictions. Where would it stop? The entire beauty and conformity of this well establishe,d neighborhood would be lost. This would be a tragedy to many of US homeowners who have worked so hard over the years to maintain. Please look at the history of previouS variance requests from Eagle Estate homeowners, and you will clearly see the word 'DENIED" over and over again. (3) No other corner lots in this subdivision have this large of a house constructed on them and neither should this one. Another issue to consider is water runoff....the flow of the water would also be adversely affected. No hardship will be created if you deny this request for the owners of this lot...simply stated, they are trying to construct too large of a house on too small of a lot. There is no hardship for them........ Please help maintain the consistency of our neighborhood and deny this request. Granting it, will negatively affect many of us here. We as homeowners have a large investment in our neighborhood and do not want anything to become an eyesore or an adversity now. For over twenty years, a presidence has been set in Eagle Estates that we, as homeowners, need to respect and honor the "ground rules".....please continue this tradition and keep the same rules for everyone...... ~\.:.\.".\ l: z.. T~") 9/18/2003 yage L. U1 L. . . Thank you for your time and cinsideration. John & Koren Sullivan 2970 Eagle Trail Clearwater,Fl33761 9/18/2003 . . Page 1 of3 Wells, Wayne From: markham [mmarkham@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 09,2003 10:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLS2003-08038 - Flexible Standard Development Approval Wayne- I spoke with Mr. and Mrs. Finstad this evening about their plans and some of my concerns. Needless to say, all of my concerns are not completely allayed. I will attempt to outline the major concerns in no particular order. 1. The thought of construction only ten (10) feet from my property line is hardly pleasant. I have two small children (girls 7 & 10). Their swing set is only a few feet away. While there is a hedge; there is no fence. For that matter, I don't know if the hedge will need to be destroyed to complete the construction. Bedrooms (upstairs) and eating area/family room (downstairs) are on the back of my house - the noise will be an issue. Are there time limits on how long construction of this type can go on? Will my family be awakened every morning to the sound of construction vehicles? Will there be a port-a-Iet, a dumpster and construction workers a few feet from my children's play area? 2. Our Association deed restrictions call for a twenty (20) foot rear setback. While I understand that the Code considers it a "side" setback, it is no mistake that the Finstad's house was built exactly twenty (20) feet from the rear lot line. It is my understanding that the Association has never granted a variance from the setbacks. Shouldn't Association approval be sought first? Also, the deed restrictions call for a twenty-five (25) foot maximum height from the slab. The elevation plans shown to me indicat~ a twenty-six (26) foot mean height. 3. There are two windows facing my property on the second story plans. As previously noted, these windows create privacy concerns. This concern could potentially be solved if the glass was not transparent, Le. frosted. It would also be nice if the windows were framed similar to the other windows on the house. 4. Mr. Finstad indicated that he has found a contractor to do the work for only $85/foot. Does that sound typical to you? I was recently quoted almost $150/foot to enclose my lanaL Does the City require similar quality construction to what is already there? 5. With the back of their house only ten (10) feet from my property, I have a concern about flooding and runoff. Upon inspection of the property, it appears obvious that the land for the expansion will have to be raised and leveled with house. Their remaining ten (10) feet will flow more steeply and directly into my back yard. Will a wall or drain be required? During construction will anything be done to prevent my back yard from becoming a mud pit when it rains? This was a serious issue with the last house constructed in our neighborhood. Willi be indemnified from any damage to my lawn or property? 6. The remaining ten (10) feet will likely house a trash can and an air conditioning unit - again less than ten (10) feet from my property line. Will these be screened by anything other than the hedge? 7. What is the nature of the meeting on September 18? Am I expected to appear and present evidence at this meeting? Is there a specific time and place? The notice was not clear on these points. Thanks for your prompt response. Mike Markham ----- Original Message ----- From: Well~L'i'La-YJ1e To: 'rr1~Llillam~ Sent: Sunday, September 07,20039:48 PM E~~'.\;,t ~ (3M~ 9/10/2003 . . Page 2 of3 Subject: RE: FLS2003-08038 - Flexible Standard Development Approval Mike & Stefanie - 1. In the LOR, Low Density Residential District, the required front setback is 25 feet, the required side setback is 15 feet and the required rear setback is 25 feet. 2. The City does not enforce deed restrictions. 3. The Finstads have submitted a survey of their property, which shows a 25-foot front setback to Eagle Estates Circle West, a 28-foot front setback to Eagle Estates Circle South, a 20-foot side (east) setback from the house to the east property line and a 1 0.5-foot side (north) setback from the house and pool deck to the north property line. 4. The City can include conditions on the approval of a request. 5. The second floor facing your property is proposed with two windows (presumed to be bedroom windows) and a ground floor door (presumed from the garage). 6. A solid fence could be required to be installed along the common property line (if one does not exist yet) as a condition of approval. This fence would not, however, address second floor windows and privacy. Fences and hedges normally don't, or can't, help with second floor situations. I have not yet been by the property, but I will look at your concern. Potentially, a way to address your concerns of privacy would be through the planting of additional trees, whether on your property or on the Finstads. This may not be an immediate cure, as the trees would have to grow to provide a measure of privacy. Keep in mind that your neighbor to the north could construct a second-floor addition (if they presently don't have one) and potentially create privacy issues for you also. You, too, could construct a second floor (if you don't presently have one) and create the same privacy issues for your neighbor. Generally, Codes provide for a maximum height of buildings and assume some loss of privacy due to second, or third, stories. Am willing to talk and look at your concern. Let me know. Wayne Wells -----Original Message----- From: markham [mailto:mmarkham@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 20039:26 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLS2003-08038 - Flexible Standard Development Approval Thank you for your prompt response. I never expected one on a Sunday. Can you tell me what the front setbacks are in the Code? Also, does the City consider the Association deed restrictions? I know that our restrictions call for a twenty (20) foot rear setback. Does your site plan show the current location of the house? I would be interested to know all four of the current setbacks for the Finstad's house. It is my understanding that the current rear (east) setback is twenty (20) feet. That would mean that they want to get ten (10) feet closer. Does the City typically require conditions to the application, i.e. hedging, fencing, etc. One of my concerns is that they will have a second story only ten (10) feet from my back yard. That creates some privacy issues that can't really be solved by a typical fence or hedge. Thanks again for your prompt answers. Mike & Stefanie Markham ----- Original Message ----- From: Wells, Wayne To: 'markham' Sent: Sunday, September 07,20037:20 PM Subject: RE: FLS2003-08038 - Flexible Standard Development Approval Mike and Stefanie - The subject property at 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West, owned by Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad, is a corner lot. Your lot is also a corner lot. The Community Development Code (Code) provides that 9/10/2003 . . Page 3 of 3 corner lots have, for setback purposes, two front setbacks (adjacent to the street frontages) and the other sides are side setbacks. The Code does not consider corner lots to have a rear setback requirement. Therefore, only a side setback is required from the common lot line between your two properties. Their request is to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet (getting closer to your property line by five feet) with a two-story addition. I hope this answers your questions. I have a site plan and building elevations for the Finstad's proposal. If you would like to view it, please call me so we can set up a time to get together. Wayne Wells -----Original Message----- From: markham [mailto:mmarkham@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, September 07,20034:38 PM To: wayne.wells@c1earwater-f1.com Subject: FLS2003-08038 - Flexible Standard Development Approval We are in receipt of your letter dated September 3, 2003, concerning the above-referenced application for 2959 Eagle Estates Circle West. My family resides at 2960 Talon Drive - the property to the immediate rear of the applicant. Your letter references a request to reduce the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story addition. The east boundary is actually the rear setback (not the side). I need to understand what is being requested as a two-story addition would not seem to implicate the rear property line unless of course the applicant is planning to expand in our direction. Please advise. E-mail at this point is fine. Stefanie can be reached during the day at 796-5076. Mike at 461-1818. Thanks. Mike & Stefanie Markham 9/10/2003 l . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Fierce, Lisa Monday, March 15, 2004 9:53 AM Gerlock, Chip; Reynolds, Mike; Wells, Wayne comments from cdb members as i called for attendance, here are the questions/comments you need to be able to address tomorrow doran - how many hotel units could be built on the dennehy site? (he couldnt do the math); is the appellant's house on the eagle estates case 10 feet from his property line (near the defendant's site)? plisko - not a cdb question but a sign question - he repainted his building and took down his attached sign; his site is zoned commercial; what can he have? i told him 20 square feet minimum/one sign; can do comp sign program up to 6% with more than one sign hooper - what is the requirement for signed/sealed plans? told him need survey to be signed/sealed and storm cales; what about site plans?? he said there are many in his packet NOT signed/sealed including site plans and cales (maybe we just have the file copies signed and sealed?) gildersleeve - on dennehy's site - how can we agree with height? (told him it's a compatibility issue when tourist district abuts residential); we asked for mitigation (not telling applicant how to do it); he wants to see the mitigation before he approves (may request a continuance or that it be brought back to board) Lisa L. Fierce City of Clearwater Assistant Planning Director Ii sa. fierce@MvClearwater.com 727.562.4561 phone * 727.562.4865 fax Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan - GO BUC(K)SI 1 ,. SITE P CASE # CASE DRC DA COBD SIGNA DATE . . eel SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST PREPARED FOR: Bradley and Hannelore finstad c/o StepMtfl G. Watts Chotrenge Mortgage '3D I Seminal" Bh,d., Suite 140 Largo. F10rida 33770 CERT1F1ED TO: Bradley Finstad and Honnelor~ Finstad and Notional City Mortgage Company ond Common"'eol/h Lund Tiffe Comoonv and . - Kimpton, Burke, White and Heiden, P A DE:SCRIPT1ON: Lot 38. EAGL: ESTATES according 10 the plot thereof os rc:corrfn:! in Plat Book 74, page ~o of the Public Records of Pine/lo$ County. Florida. fi TALON ---1..-"011I1 or DRIVE-n =~~'8 8 ~ ~~~"""- ~~ SC'LE! I ......~ ." . . " ,.. L_ ,,,, _, '''' . ..., ""T"" .......,,, II .. '4 ,.. ..-.".... ..." .." " q@IJ 1:';)O\i\O~.~, ,r 5:'00.09"22"E: / '. ,f .,........,... ....... . I" "" --, ..... I t. I -; I ,..... ..,....~'" t_ '.;1: :0 NOTE: THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEflT Of A TIlU: COMMITMENT. SO' nN 11\& .' ~.".." .t.,"' IUOIJS - 20.00' ARC - 31.~Z' OIORO - 28.28' C..B. - S,"S"09'22~E. COlIC. CURB h RQAOW :r A..."CESS WE'-"(HT ~I-- J_ 'l:.. N.OO'09'22"W. I EAGLE ESTATES CIRCLE WEST I . ,.... -- ,... I I . I I -'\ ....... SURVEY LEGEND "-... "".... I ..., r. ! I ,..,,-.- L_ I..J : ~) 5.LII. _ f.lfl. .. r.c.... - FHD. . fiND. a: Fl.. - !L. - R/W - ~.) : CONe. ~ so IIlOH ROO. 5/1- F'OUNO lION 1lOO. ~/ll" roUND CDNatO'[ a.IIC>>&W{"". -4......... flUID NUWIIDI Fl.00I> ELEw.TloH _r~F-I'.y PAOPDm LINE I'rPICOl. CCNCIlC1l: FLOOD lrNE NOTE: THIS SITE UES WITHIN A F.E.M,A. flOOD ZONE C ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUc!'7Y-PANEL NUMBER 125139 0089 C, INDEx ;;ATED MAY 6, 1999. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:: I H~RF:BY C[RTIFY ~T A SURVf:t' OF 1"H[ PROpeRTY DESCRlBfl) HUl[ON It'AS PrRrOR/Jrn UNDER U'I' SUPERVISION ON JUl.}" 29. 1999 NJO THAT IT COIJPUE:S WiTH C-'4APrER ti1GI1-6. F.A.C. TlfE PROPeRTY COWfAlNS IIJPRO"9J[fo/TS .'.5 SHOWl-!. TII~HO VlS/8LE_[NCROACHl.<[N7'S 1': - SANDY - UDVERJ\S FLOff/DA LICENSED SUR'V'EYOR AND MAPpeR 1'0. _. ~ ~ ~f~~{~~K;[~~.;;;~~~C:'~... .,:~.. ~ LLOVERAS BAUR & STEVENS ENGINEERS - SURvEYORS - PlANNERS ILO ??oo208 Zl/228 U.s. _"y 19 N. C~~i[R. R~IOo\ .3.J7fot P'=n., :e:J) 78~-J~e5 ten:: (a13) 7S+-tl53 llIlA"'" ev; ~... 100M CHEC1<Ol BY; '!9 ,ht. ) ----I APf"'RO\.."fD DT: OI.lE: .r.JLY 29. 11>99 I~ 1".30' s::- '6:'':';' C ~.I.39 oct!J9C ~'o'.83 FloOd Zone F.I.A.M. RevitIon BaM Flood EIev. BOUNDARY SURVEY OFz Lot 39. BAGLB BS'rA'lBS as recorded in Plat BoOk 74, pages 40 , 41. public records of pine11as County. Florida. . PREPARED EXCLUSIVELY FORz Gary M. Catenac Corp. J John H. HALBY. f1 ,,$. \.~ ~or 38 ~ I~ "'-'CO'b,~-W "/8.5d. C}~ td~ ~ A~O \ . ~' '=0 ~,! Hi -I 'd ,uu.i jr. 91-~' ~ '" t;:.) I .~fI I ", ftI'I' I p~' -~_...- ~: / .I II~ _:~~ :l". \ iooolI.:f ~ TALON DRIVE .,1 ~ ..a. ~~.u;-r 'l1 #OOOD,:r.-lU ": .1/ . ".~ . //4.'0. NOTa. NOT vAtfO WITHOUT AN EMIOSSID SUAVIYOR'S SIAL '~ W ",,1- . uffi ~ ~~ ~ O~ 'bJ C/), WVI ),' ~.,~u.' -~ ~,~ t W> w~ ~ ...J 0 ~ (!) c( <(~ UJ /If" PI . '\ I .I~ ~ ) ~ I \l' I: ~ I .~. h'-(I i/'\ . f" \ ~- ~~\' : If ';'1- \~ : ':"'\~~ "--~~ 'd ~~ ,~/. tJf'.~.",,~, ~, -0 L , ~.--... ~&~~. '~ ~. ~ , ~ f tOT 39 . i. "'"~~ , .. c-; \t. . a e . , .I~"" . \ ~ \,; Mv-~ .. bf" . . ~I' ...t~ n.4 f . A.,} , ",."". It ~ ~:.; - E " "~... .~' tI-:fiI1,.,' tlP-tP,' .' t1i.; L';-. ~~' .,' . " ,.;,' :,11"" ,( ~!~..?o. ,I '~~ l "'i! · ~ ~ t ~ ~: \~ rJ(JI/.Df.I# 8R:J:1 0011 (113) N7.20SS ~&"E"LAffD~YUlQ ~ C. ~AIM. P.L.S, . Ilera, certify .... IN IUfWe1 .......... ........ ""'" IN ,equHIfMfltI ~ '1oficM AcMwlIIIf.....Code. e~ ~ ~ c. ..,. AItM ... ,...... ........'M aun.,er...... '.0. Boll 1232. Tarpon Springs. rL 34688 PIny Ch"': /11'/1 . OFl_ By: 8f