Loading...
APP02-01-01 . . Fierce, Usa From: Sent: To: Subject: Kephart, Richard Tuesday, February 26,20029:51 AM Fierce, Lisa FW : Tom Selhorst new address FYI nn-Original Message--m From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:49 AM To: Kephart, Richard; Ruscher, Amy Subject: RE: Tom Selhorst new address Make sure Lisa has this address for his appeal. nmOriginal Message--m From: Kephart, Richard Sent: Tuesday, February 26,20029:22 AM To: Ruscher, Amy; Clayton, Gina Subject: Tom Selhorst new address Amy, Tom Selhorst called and gave me a new address: 1005 Amble Lane Clearwater FL, 33755 1 <AfPOZ-Ol-Oi. . TO P t A-Uf/,(M 1J~r c/Yt1JYr-e[t~lIfftUi 'r~l~ f0, t&IiPJ-r f? tJ ~ M_feAL 'fQ 1ttt C~ WU[/\;~ ti tJQJ}eLiff W1I--i4/t 8' Q~fU>A-WYIl~ W! j0{ A- c~ Qb( f? 12 f( "i q \.r;-; t- oV-&!! MJVt-b y f~f2{itf)J A- tJ11JJI1.11 ;4:W, . Ab fe{ ~CW WL~i 6 e, '{ v~ L,S ?{ll 1t-05;kf, TN/1 Sakf~( /~~J'-Il-Jnls~ (-JJ . c[,yt;eyj/l-'ret ~( . ::JJ''1c1TJ t1t1{ rJb0'- PLANNING & OEVELOPMENT ! SERVICES I CiTY OF CLEARWATER ~~^-- - ..... -- -,~- .I Rec-eipt No: 1200105664 . Date: 1/24/2002 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description APP 02-01-01 04 Flexible Commercial Payments: Method Payer CREDIT CARD CREDIT CARD RECEIPT . Revenue Account No. 010-341262 Amount Due $195.00 Bank No Acct Check No VISA/MC TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: Amount Paid $195.00 $195.00 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW HOUSING DMSION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES March 26, 2002 PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Mr. Tom Sehlhorst 1005 Amble Lane Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Development Order regarding case APP 02-01-01 at 1050 N. Myrtle A venue Dear Mr. Selhorst: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On March 19, 2002, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your appeal application of a denial of an occupational license for vehicle service use within the Commercial District, under the appeal provisions of. Section 4-501 of the Community Development Code. The occupational license application was denied by the Planning Department on December 31, 2001 because the vehicle service use as requested is not permitted in the Commercial zoning district. The Community Development Board DENIED the appeal application because the applicant did not show that the decision appealed from, misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that an appeal of the CDB decision must be initiated by filing a petition for writ of certiorari in the Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit within 30 days of the date of this order. The appeal period for your case will expire on April 25, 2002. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Lisa Fierce, Assistant Planning Director, at 727-562-4561. ~. ~erald Figurski, Chairman Community Development Board Cc: Leslie Dougall-Sides, Assistant City Attorney S:\Planning Department\C D lJ\APPEALSlMyrtle N 1050 Sehlhorst\Myrtle N 1050 DEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc BRlAI"' J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, ViCE MAYOR-COWIISSIONER \VH!Ti':EY GR.\'\", Cml~IISSI0I\ER Hon HAJ\liLTON, CmiMISS!ONER BII.I.JOI':SON, COMMISSIOI\ER "EQUA.L EMPLOYMENT A;~O AFFIRIviATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" "' CI1aOF CLEARWATER APPLICA'WON FOR PROPOSED U ',. Property Address: 0 [;.'0 IV !n /!.. rl s Proposed Use of Property: lip M f> 0 r;. 'f -ep I~ e. c . (1{,hJ tJlO<;5 CurrentJPast Use of Property: ,..d/ ~ O~L -tJ::O fSC2 / ~ 1fff: e, w~ -- op,h f<flc;,/:/!;#,ph/t:we( :Dt7Jte~ P{y7h7/~ /JVD oeL- 000 IJ J.j~tJ Ae P #//2- ~ee V I~ 1:;) Other: Sec. 137 .lXJ7, Land Development Code, City of Clearwater, and Sec. AI03.9, Stmdud Building Code, state that . building shall not be occupied prior to issuance of. Certificate of OccupancylUse. Any Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee must be paid prior to issuance of. Certificate of Occupancy. To the best of my knowledge, I certify that I am authorized to make apptication for the above-referenced property; that the land, buDding, and accessory stmctllre(s) meets aU apptic:able buDding, zoning, fll'e, safety, and health codes of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, State of Florida, PineUas County and the City of Clearwater, and that this property will be used for the purpose(s) stated hereon. tlii.1L1ri( Jd. -Ll, /- D I Date 11i~ ....ut5.kda U ::>outn Myrtle Avenue, t,;learwater, t-'L JJ/t>o · DEe 3 1 2001 hone (727) 562-4567 Fax (72.62-4576 , C1S CATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE p;ease Print or ~~~lm Owner/Qualifier Name: I 0 Wt ~ e Ii L Ai fJ ~ 6 T jif:te o~~) tf 7 Mailing address: I (1~. D tV tf~~T/A{ VUy r€r L-~ A v~ Street Number A' ) Street N~Ze J'L . -l'~e2or ~~ L "-.. L..(t: LLL _ ,J-J ~}d City. . State Zip Code Business Name: :1/ / It /" ( ^1 .-..J) Complete Company Name I .4- tMe~ ( ( f1 Business Address: i O~J 0 tJ 0 tt(0i( lktY~T L,{J ftl!f Street Nam(c ( X State Suite or Apt # Street NumbeLr ) La, City Zip Code Owner Home Phone: Business Phone: . Date of Business Opening: Area Code Number Area code Number Month/Day/Year Individual 0 Partnership 0 Corporation ~ Please list officers and titles: Certification number <if required): I certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application may result in denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws. and to notify the City licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify I am the business owner or owner's legal agent. -a.()~);(,t)tluJMdT TiiOM'5Itt.selfU~G{ ! rx.-j'tJ tJ( Signature and Title Print Name Date Approval Zoning Traffic Engineering Building Police FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Date Category # Fee Date Issued Am!. Paid Total Owner I Group Fire Health Harbormaster Fic.lCorp. Other ~ (\0 "b'-' ~~ . - tNc,.A-+s. ~ <;; ? k C;:;1.'S2rV t '-...c2- W k..-R. ~ -+- ;'- ~ ~ Occupational License App.doc <.. .l' ~ '\ \; ~~I~ ~ ~ Lc)dUVV\ \;0<:Jod 1/15/2002 2:18~35 PM Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 Name: .CGC056700 Address: 1050 N MYRTLE AVE Project Description: Cornerstone PENDING-75316 Appl# A-067239]NEW BUILDING, PARKING LOT, STORMWATER RUNOFF, LANDSCAPING A ND C.O. ***See Case Notes & Condo Type of Permit: Combination # Stories: 1 ISidential/COmmercial: C Building Height: 12.00 isting Use: OFFC Living Area: 0 Existing Condition: Average condl Garage/Carport: 0 Proposed Use: OFFC Commercial: 1,344 # Living Units: 1 Other Area: 0 Type of Work: NEW Project Value: $30,950.00 Work includes Bid Ele Plm Mec Gas Roof o Traf Env Fire Eng Zon Tie-In Survey D [2] D .0 [J Type of Material: Height: 0.00 Length: 0.00 Setback: 0.00 Barbed Wire: D FT Waterfront Lot: D FT Corner Lot: 0 FT Multiple Front Yards: D Double Frontage Lot: Type of Easement: Page 1 of 12 Updated: 01-11-01 GBD Project: SEHLHORST, TOM & ROBIN~ Dept. of Commerce #: 324 Plan Bin Number: FT Use Group: SF Construction Type: V-U SF # Structures: 1 SF Type Ownership: PR SF Design Review District: Minimum Setbacks Water Mtr. Size: 01 Backflow Device: Irrig. Mtr Size: Fire Sprinkler: D Flood Zone: Req.Base Flood Elev: .0 As Built Elev: .0 FT FT Front: 0.00 FT Zoning at Review Date: ? Side: 0.00 Rear: 0.00 FT FT Land use: Max. Units/Acre: 0 Permitted Use: LDC Section #: Required Parking Spaces Regular: 0 Handicapped: 0 Directions to Site: 11-27-00 still need mec and roofing sub cards.......01-12-01 STILL NEED MEC AND ROOFING SUB CARDS Additional Comments: INCLUDES BUI, ELE, PLU, ROOFING, ENG/UTIL, TRAFFIC ENG, ENV IR AND FIRE INSPECTIONS; 02/04/99 - KATHY - RECEIVED UTIL TITY AND TRAFFIC SITE PL AN CHANGES PER REQUEST FROM BOB PERKINS 02/04/99 - KATHY - RECEIVED CHANGES FOR LANDSCAPING PLANS THAT WERE RE 1/15/2002 Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 2:18~35 PM Activity Hold Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp. Level By Updated Notes BCPI101 101 *Footer/Elec. Bond 9/1/1999 9/2/1999 FAIL No Hold VWP 9/1/1999 needs ufer grnd BCPI108 108*Lintel 9/27/1999 9/28/1999 COMM No Hold VWP 9/29/1999 already done BCPI109 109*Drywall-Screw/Nailing 10/7/1999 10/8/1999 FAIL No Hold VWP 10/8/1999 not ready for drywall inspection needs frame and electric first.60 inch turning radius in bathroom BCPI107 107*Frame 10/26/1999 10/27/1999 FAIL No Hold VWP 10/28/1999 poly seal top plates .CP1110 110*Final 1/19/2001 1/20/2001 SCHD No Hold GBD 1/19/2001 CPI110 110*Final 2/8/2001 2/9/2001 FAIL No Hold VWP 2/9/2001 locked out BCPI110 110*Final 12/22/2000 12/26/2000 FRE1 No Hold VWP 12/26/2000 needs frame inspection for new steel building. needs electric inspection final.needs fire and others signed off.ada sign to high.landing outside of north exit door not level with slab. needs ada signs parking lot .improper turning radius in bathroom.called tom s this pm. left message BCPF520 520 Fire Final 2/27/2001 2/28/2001 2/27/2001 DONE No Hold D_A 2/27/2001 BCPA520 Certificate of Occupancy 2/27/2001 DONE No Hold AKR 2/27/2001 ISSUED AND CALLED FOR RELEASE OF POWER. SPOKE WITH MELONY BCPF520 520 Fire Final 2/26/2001 2/27/2001 2/26/2001 DONE No Hold K_B 2/26/2001 SIGNED OFF BY D. ANDERSON BCPA900 900 Job Completed 2/26/2001 DONE No Hold K_B 2/26/2001 JOB COMPLETED - OK TO ISSUE CO -PER VERN PACKER BCPI110 110*Final 2/22/2001 2/23/2001 2/23/2001 DONE No Hold VWP 2/23/2001 BCPI007 007 Tie In Survey 2/23/2001 2/24/2001 2/23/2001 DONE No Hold VWP 2/23/2001 .X999 Extended to 06-AUG-2001 2/21/2001 DONE SYS 2/21 /200 1 BCPI110 110*Final 2/15/2001 2/16/2001 2/16/2001 FAIL No Hold RVA 2/16/2001 ( need mech. sub. and roofing sub. contr. )Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 02/15/2001 at 22:01 :41. Contact: (727) 584-0595. BCPQ904 904 Driveway Final 2/1/2001 2/2/2001 2/6/2001 DONE No Hold HELO 2/1/2001 Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 02/01/2001 at 23:27:02. Contact: (727) 584-0595. BCPC20 Building Plan Ammendment #3 1/31/2001 1/31/2001 DONE No Hold REM 1/31/2001 BCPA252 Red Tag 9/12/2000 1/22/2001 DONE Hold w/Override BLB 9/12/2000 SEE COD2000-04855. CONTRACTOR HAS PULLED OFF JOB, LETTER IN FILE. NEEDS NEW LICENSED CONTRACTOR. BCPA253 Red Tag CLEARED 1/19/2001 DONE No Hold GBD 1/19/2001 BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 1/19/2001 GBD 1/19/2001 Red Tag BCPW732 Landscape Final 1/11/2001 1/11/2001 1/16/2001 DONE No Hold S_K 1/16/2001 need 5 pine trees only have 4 OK Page 2 of 12 1/15/2002 Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 2:1&:35 PM Activity Hold Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp. Level By Updated Notes BCPQ004 004 Traffic Final 1/11/2001 1/12/2001 1/16/2001 PASS No Hold M_G 1/16/2001 see case notes BCPA253 Red Tag CLEARED 1/11/2001 DONE No Hold GBD 1/11/2001 BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 1/11/2001 GBD 1/11/2001 Red Tag BCPM 1 00 Activity Hold Override 1/8/2001 VWP 1/8/2001 Red Tag BCPI107 107*Frame 1/8/2001 1/9/2001 1/8/2001 DONE No Hold VWP 1/8/2001 metal building. no electric added to this part of building CPK204 204*Final - Electrical 1/2/2001 1/3/2001 1/3/2001 DONE No Hold GBD 1/2/2001 PM 1 00 Activity Hold Override 1/2/2001 GBD 1/2/2001 Red Tag BCPA252 Red Tag 12/26/2000 12/2712000 DONE Hold wlOverride K_B 12/26/2000 RED TAG ISSUED BY VERN PACKER- SEE NOTES FOR RED TAG -ISSUED TO MAINTENANCE RESOURCE BCPA253 Red Tag CLEARED 12/27/2000 DONE No Hold SLW 12/27/2000 BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 12/27/2000 GBD 12/27/2000 Red Tag BCPB040 Traffic Review 12/22/1999 12/22/1999 12/22/2000 DONE Hold w/Override REM 12/22/2000 Plan Amendment #1 - see hold conditions BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 12/22/2000 REM 12/22/2000 Red Tag BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 12/22/2000 N_E 12/22/2000 Red Tag BCPC15 Building Plan Ammendment #2 11/3/2000 12/13/2000 DONE No Hold JMC 11/3/2000 metal building BCPI106 106*Slab 11/27/2000 11/28/2000 11/28/2000 DONE No Hold RVA 11/28/2000 BCPA253 Red Tag CLEARED 11/27/2000 DONE No Hold T_C 11/27/2000 BCPM 100 Activity Hold Override 11/27/2000 T_C 11/27/2000 Traffic Review .M 100 Activity Hold Override 11 /27/2000 T_C 11/27/2000 Red Tag PX999 Extended to 21-FEB-2001 10/2/2000 DONE SYS 10/2/2000 BCPC10 Building Plan Ammendment #1 8/16/2000 9/8/2000 DONE No Hold JMC 11 /3/2000 pouring slab and footing for future metal building. plan amend #1 $159.00 metal building will be plan amend #2. $235.00 BCPM 1 00 Activity Hold Override 8/24/2000 JMC 8/24/2000 Traffic Review BCPM 120 People Hold Override 8/24/2000 JMC 8/24/2000 Name: .ER0008021 o Notes: ROBERTS, MATTHEW L 3/9/2000-RED TAG ISSUED BY MEH, BCP1999-020004. BCPA301 EXTEND EXPIRATION DATE 8/24/2000 DONE No Hold JMC 8/24/2000 APPROVED BY KEVIN GARRIOTT TO 9/30/2000. JM BCPM130 Condition Hold Override 8/24/2000 JMC 8/24/2000 BUILDING REVIEW PLAN AMEND 1 BCPB010 ZONING DEPARTMENT 6/23/1998 12/3/1998 8/21/2000 DONE No Hold JVS 8/21/2000 need variance BCPC40 Engineering Plan Ammendment #1 8/16/2000 8/16/2000 DONE No Hold K_B 9/11/2000 See conditions. Page 3 of 12 1/15/2002 Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 2:18.~35 PM Activity Hold Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp. Level By Updated Notes BCPB075 Landscape Review 12/9/1999 12/9/1999 8/16/2000 DONE Hold w/Override LJ 8/16/2000 See conditions BCPB010 ZONING DEPARTMENT 6/23/1998 12/3/1998 8/16/2000 DONE No Hold L_F 8/16/2000 See Conditions BCPX888 Expired on 16-JUN-2000 6/16/2000 DONE SYS 6/16/2000 BCPM 100 Activity Hold Override 4/26/2000 M_G 4/26/2000 Traffic Review BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 4/26/2000 M_G 4/26/2000 Landscape Review CPQ004 004 Traffic Final 4/26/2000 4/25/2000 4/25/2000 FAIL No Hold M_G 4/26/2000 preliminary inspection - see hold conditions CPA252 Red Tag 3/10/2000 4/11/2000 DONE Hold w/Override FR 4/11/2000 BCPA253 Red Tag CLEARED 4/11/2000 DONE No Hold FR 4/11/2000 BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 4/10/2000 M_G 4/10/2000 Red Tag BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 4/10/2000 M_G 4/10/2000 Landscape Review BCPK204 204*Final - Electrical 3/8/2000 3/9/2000 3/9/2000 FRE1 No Hold MEH 3/9/2000 need surge arrestor BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 3/8/2000 MEH 3/8/2000 Traffic Review BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 3/8/2000 MEH 3/8/2000 Landscape Review BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 3/7/2000 GBD 3/7/2000 Traffic Review BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 3/7/2000 GBD 3/7/2000 Landscape Review BCPX999 Extended to 16-JUN-2000 2/29/2000 DONE SYS 2/29/2000 BCPI109 109*Drywall-Screw/Nailing 12/15/1999 12/16/1999 12/16/1999 DONE No Hold VWP 12/16/1999 BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 12/15/1999 R_H 12/15/1999 Landscape Review .0305 305 Final - Plumbing 12/9/1999 12/10/1999 12/10/1999 PASS No Hold THC 12/10/1999 BCP0305 305 Final - Plumbing 12/8/1999 12/9/1999 12/9/1999 FRE1 No Hold THC 12/9/1999 floor drain requires trap primer----protect piping & seal penetrations----need backflow device at hose bib PAID Red Tag 12/9/99. Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 12/08/1999 at 07:00:39. Contact: (727) 934-0323. BCP0305 305 Final - Plumbing 12/27/2000 12/28/2000 12/9/1999 DONE No Hold K_B 2/26/2001 BCPM100 Activity Hold Override 12/9/1999 MBW 12/9/1999 Landscape Review BCPA253 Red Tag CLEARED 12/9/1999 DONE No Hold FR 12/9/1999 BCPA252 Red Tag 12/9/1999 12/9/1999 DONE Hold w/Override FR 12/9/1999 Final Plumbing RT paid by Tom Sehlhorst BCPC105 Fire Plan Ammendment #2 12/6/1999 12/6/1999 DONE No Hold J_D 12/6/1999 BCPI107 107*Frame 11/4/1999 11/5/1999 11/5/1999 DONE No Hold VWP 11/5/1999 BCPP901 901 Completed Roof 10/26/1999 10/27/1999 10/28/1999 DONE No Hold VWP 10/28/1999 Page 4 of 12 1/15/2002 Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 2:18~35 PM Activity Hold Updated Activity Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp. Level By Updated Notes BCPK202 202*1st Rough - Electrical 10/15/1999 10/18/1999 10/18/1999 DONE No Hold SH 10/15/1999 BCP0302 302 2nd Rough - Plumbing 10/13/1999 10/14/1999 10/14/1999 COMM No Hold THC 10/14/1999 2nd rough ok however room does not appear to comply w/60" wheelchair turning radius BCPX999 Extended to 29-FEB-2000 10/6/1999 DONE SYS 10/6/1999 BCPI135 135*Nail - Structural Sheath 10/4/1999 10/5/1999 10/4/1999 DONE No Hold VWP 10/4/1999 BCPI108 108*Lintel 9/23/1999 9/24/1999 9/23/1999 DONE No Hold VWP 9/23/1999 .P1105 105*Foundation Walls 9/16/1999 9/17/1999 9/17/1999 COMM No Hold JJW 9/20/1999 ACTUALLY NEED A SLAB INSP ONLY. APPEARS TO BE OK AND PER APPROVED PLANS. THIS IS FOR CONC. PARKING AREA ONLY. DOES NOT INCl. APPRON. BCPI101 101 *Footer/Elec. Bond 9/2/1999 9/3/1999 9/2/1999 DONE No Hold VWP 9/2/1999 BCP0301 301 1st Rough - Plumbing 8/30/1999 8/31/1999 8/30/1999 PASS No Hold THC 8/30/1999 BCP0303 303 Sewer - Plumbing 8/30/1999 8/31/1999 8/30/1999 PASS No Hold THC 8/30/1999 BCPA502 Placard 4/9/1999 DONE No Hold ECD 4/9/1999 BCPA502 Placard 3/24/1999 DONE No Hold K_B 3/24/1999 BCPA502 Placard 3/15/1999 DONE No Hold K_B 3/15/1999 BCPB020 BUILDING DEPT (BUILDING) 6/23/1998 2/16/1999 2/16/1999 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 addressed comments BCPB030 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 6/23/1998 2/16/1999 2/16/1999 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 BCPB070 ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT 7/7/1998 2/16/1999 2/16/1999 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 conditions met .B090 FIRE DEPARTMENT 6/23/1998 2/16/1999 2/16/1999 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 as/per JD signature B040 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 2/16/1999 2/16/1999 2/16/1999 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 see hold conditions BCPB040 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 8/17/1998 2/16/1999 2/16/1999 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 DEPARTMENT BCPB150 BUILDING DEPT (ELECTRICAL) 6/23/1998 2/2/1999 2/2/1999 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 shower eliminated BCPB030 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 6/23/1998 2/16/1999 10/30/1998 FAIL No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 see hold notes BCPB040 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 8/17/1998 2/16/1999 8/1711998 FAIL No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 see hold conditions DEPARTMENT BCPB020 BUILDING DEPT (BUILDING) 6/23/1998 2/16/1999 7/14/1998 FAIL No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 SEE HOLD CONDITIONS BCPB030 UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 6/23/1998 2/16/1999 7/14/1998 FAIL No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 see hold notes BCPB150 BUILDING DEPT (ELECTRICAL) 6/23/1998 2/2/1999 7/14/1998 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 BCPB150 BUILDING DEPT (ELECTRICAL) 6/23/1998 2/2/1999 7/14/1998 FAIL No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 SEE HOLD CONDITIONS BCPB170 BUILDING DEPT (PLUMBING) 6/23/1998 7/14/1998 7/14/1998 PASS No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 BCPB070 ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT 7/7/1998 2/16/1999 7/7/1998 FAIL No Hold B_J 10/31/1998 SEE HOLD CONDITIONS Page 5 of 12 __ _________________u_ 1/15/2002 2:1~:35 PM Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 Activity Description BCPB090 FIRE DEPARTMENT Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 6/23/1998 2/16/1999 7/6/1998 Activity Hold Level No Hold Updated By B_J Updated Notes 10/31/1998 SEE NOTES Disp. FAIL Condition Cond Stat. Changed Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Updated By LAND Landscape Review 2 Met 8/16/2000 LJ e need two more copies of landsacpe plan ZON Zoning Review 2 Met 7/19/2000 MTP 7/19/2000 MTP see case notes BLD BUILDING REVIEW PLAN AMEND 1 2 Met 8/17/2000 KS 8/23/2000 K_S . 1. ALL DRAWINGS/PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & DATA MUST BE DESIGNED FOR COMPLIANCE TO CHAPTER 16, "STRUCTURAL LOADS" BY A REGISTERED FLORIDA ARCHITECT (OR) ENGINEER WHO SHALL SIGN, DATE AND AFFIX THEIR OFFICIAL SEAL TO SAID DRAWINGS/PLANS FOR ANY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AFFECTING THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF A BUILDING (OR) HAVING A CONSTRUCTION VALUE OF $10,000. (OR MORE), [SECTION 104.2.3 SBCCI1997 STANDARD BUILDING CODE]. "'Submit engineered plans for proposed 864 sq ft building signed & sealed by a Florida Professional Engineer. Include a detail(s) of how this building is to be anchored to the ground, as discussed. Permit application mentions concrete piers -- provide engineering for any proposed piers or other foundation/slab on which this structure is to sit. How is the Framing System (primary frames, endwall frames, & bracing) anchored to the ground below the base plate? (Rec'd 8/11/2000). Include the Type of Construction (I - VI) & Occupancy Type (USE). Clearly indicate where any openings will occur; doors, windows, etc. (NOT REC"D, to date) 08/11/2000 Engineering for metal & steel building submited. There is no clear indication as to where openings (doors, windows, etc) will occur, as previously requested & discussed. Plans indicate doors and windows as "optional". The Architect or Engineer of record needs to submit a clear floor plan to supplement building engineering that clearly indicates: where all openings are proposed, the Construction Type (I-VI) as defined CH 6 ('97 Std Bldg Code) and the Occupancy Classification as defined CH 3 ('97 Std Bldg Code) as previously requested. 08/23/2000: Owner submitted a proposed floor plan indicating where openings will be. Page 6 of 12 1/15/2002 2:18;35 PM Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 Cond Code Title BLD BUILDING REVIEW PLAN AMEND 1 Condition Stat. Hold Status Changed 2 Met 8/17/2000 Changed By Tag Updated K S 9/8/2000 Updated By K_S . 2. ALL NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR PREMISES INTENDED FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY OR USE ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE NOT LESS THAN (1) WATER CLOSET AND (1) HAND WASHING LAVATORY PER SECTION 401.2.2 [SBCC11994 STANDARD PLUMBING CODE]. ***Sumit a detailed Plumbing Plan that indicates all proposed plumbing facilities and fixtures in compliance with SBCCI 1994 Standard Plumbing Code. Include a Water Supply/Circulation riser (isometric) diagram and Sanitary Water & Vent riser (isometric) diagram, and a fixture schedule. 08/17/2000 Including proposed addition, total building area will = 1,344 sq ft which exceeds maximum building area for which a single toilet facility (used by both males & females) may be used. This addition, as submitted, will require SEPARATE toilet facilities for males & females and a drinking fountain, as outlined Table 407, SBCCI1994 Std Plumbing Code. 08/23/2000: As a Storage "S2" occupancy, as defined CH 3, Std Bldg Code, the Std Plumbing Code does not indicate ANY exceptions from having separate toilet facilities for men & women for Storage occupancy. Separate toilet facilities for men & women and (1) drinking fountain is REQUIRED, as discussed. 08/31/2000: A fourth Plan Amend permit application was submitted today indicating a proposed building use as "office" (aka "Business" occupancy as defined in Std Bldg Code). As such, the 'habitable' sq ftg meets an exception in Table 407 allowing a single facility consisting of one water closet & one lavatory to be used by both males & females (Office occupancy with max bldg area = 1200 sq ft). BLD BUILDING REVIEW PLAN AMEND 1 2 Met 8/17/2000 KS 8/23/2000 K_S 3. PROVIDE A DETAILED ELECTRICAL PLAN ON PROPOSED ELECTRICAL WORK INCLUDING THE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ELECTRICAL BREAKER PANEL(S) AND INCLUDE ANY PROPOSED CHANGES/UPGRADES, PANEL SCHEDULES & LOAD CALCULATIONS, IF APPLICABLE. INCLUDE ALL ELECTRICAL OUTLETS, LIGHTING FIXTURES, EMERGENCY LIGHTING AND EXIT LIGHTING, AS REQUIRED. ***Is this building going to have any power? 08/23/2000 Owner has stated that no power is proposed for addition, no electrical plans have been submitted and NO ELECTRIC IS INCLUDED for building addition. . TECO Traffic Engineering Condition 2 Met 8/16/2000 RES CO 8/16/2000 L_F 1. Site plan needs to show adjoining property to the south 2. All vehicle access areas require paved surface meeting dimensional standards 3. Need access agreement with any property owners involved with access to this property 4. Need required parking provided on the property TECO Traffic Engineering Condition 2 Met 8/16/2000 RES CO 8/16/2000 L_F Prior to final inspection, site will need: 1. 5 ft wide paved and striped Hcp parking space access aisle 2. Driveway onto Myrtle Avenue as approved on site plan of 2/16/99 3. Parking space striping per City, State and ADA standards ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW P. A. #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/24/2000 MEL Need a copy of an approved S.M.F.M.D. permit. NOT NEEDED PER MIKE QUILLEN ( PER WILLIAM HORNE). Page 7 of 12 1/15/2002 2:18,:35 PM . . Page 8 of 12 Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 Cond Code Title ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW P.A. #1 Condition Stat. Hold Status Changed 2 Met 8/16/2000 Changed By Tag Updated MEL 8/18/2000 Updated By MEL Need get an approval from Pinellas County to allow access from the Pinellas Trail corridor. TOM'S PROPOSED BUILDING WILL NOT HAVE A BAY DOOR ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF BUILDING PER TOM SEHLHORST (JUST A DOOR FOR FIRE EXIT). ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL Need to install an improved surface within Pinellas Trail corridor to the driveway (Note: driveway needs to be an improved surface) of this proposed site. TOM'S PROPOSED BUILDING WILL NOT HAVE A BAY DOOR ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF BUILDING PER TOM SEHLHORST (JUST A DOOR FOR FIRE EXIT). NO NEED FOR AN IMPROVED SURFACE. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/24/2000 MEL Need a signed and sealed (original) site plan. The signature need to be a registered engineer in the State of Florida. BLD BUILDING REVIEW PLAN AMEND 1 2 8/17/2000 KS 8/23/2000 K_S Met 4. New Market site plan (Cornerstone Engineering) & plan amendment/permit application dated Dee 02 1999 state: "attach metal 2 car parking garage, crushed asphalt floor, 2 car parking, concrete piers". A. As outlined in 411.4.2, all enclosed parking garages exceeding 850 sq ft REQUIRE a mechanical ventilation system capable of providing at least (6) continuous air changes per hour & complying with ventilation requirements of 411.5 (1997 Std Bldg Code). B. Parking surfaces shall be of concrete or similar noncombustible and nonabsorbent materials as outlined in 411.2.5, SBCCI 1997 Standard Building Code. C. Automobile parking garages shall be separated from other occupancies in accordance with 704 (which requires 1-hour occupancy separation). 08/17/2000 Owner submitted a revised permit (plan amend) application with a revised Project Description and no longer includes "2 car parking garage" as part of the proposed building use, as originally indicated. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL Met Need a copy of the drainage calculations. DRAWINGS HAS CALCULATIONS ON THEM. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL Need a copy of the recorded ingress/egress easements from all adjacent property owners that will need to allow the developer to cross their property to in order to have access along the west side of the property. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL NOT HAVE A BAY DOOR ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF BUILDING PER TOM SEHLHORST (JUST A DOOR FOR FIRE EXIT). ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/24/2000 MEL Need a separate righ-of-way permit for any/all work within Myrtle Avenue. Any/all driveway connection(s) along Myrtle Avenue will need to show grades of the proposed improved surface and the flow line of the existing curb. REQUIRED AT TIME OF PERMITTING FOR THIS BUILDING. NOT NEEDED PER MIKE QUILLEN ( PER WILLIAM HORNE) 1/15/2002 2:18.:35 PM Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 Cond Code Title ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW P.A. #1 Condition Stat. Hold Status Changed 2 Met 8/16/2000 Updated By MEL Changed By Tag Updated MEL 8/18/2000 Need to have an improved surface with a turn around (that will meet a garbage truck turning radius) in order to allow the gargbage trucks to have access to the dumpster tor this site. Dumpster pad to be located on the property (not in any right-ot-way), meet all setback requirements, tully screen enclosed, .....etc. TOM SEHLHORST HAS GIVEN THE CITY A LETTER FROM SOLID WASTE TO HAVE BLACK BARREL PICK-UP. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL . Need to have a dumpster pad shown on site plan. Location to be approved by the solid waste department. TOM SEHLHORST HAS GIVEN THE CITY A LETTER FROM SOLID WASTE TO HAVE BLACK BARREL PICK-UP. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL Need to screen enclose the dumpster. TOM SEHLHORST HAS GIVEN THE CITY A LETTER FROM SOLID WASTE TO HAVE BLACK BARREL PICK-UP. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL All curb replacement to meet city standards and specifications. THE SEPARATE REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL BE NOTED APPROPIATL Y. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL Depending on the use, city may require a back flow preventor device. This would be installed by the city at the owners/developer's expense. TOM SEHLHORST SAYS THE AREA WILL BE USED FOR WHEEL BARRELS AND SHOVELS. BACK FLOW WILL NOT BE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. ENG ENGINEERING REVIEW PA #1 2 Met 8/16/2000 MEL 8/18/2000 MEL . Handicap parking stall to meet city/state/A.DA standards and specifications. THIS IS A REQUIREMENT AND WILL HAVE TO STRIPPED ACCORDING TO THE CITY'S STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. PARKING LOT WILL NEED AN INSPECTION AND PASS BEFORE FINAL C.O. IS GRANTED. TECO Traffic Engineering Condition 2 Met 1/16/2000 M_G CO 1/16/2001 M_G Parking stall lines need to be better quality and be white paint, not yellow Fees Fee Case Start End Trans. Type Type Date Date Case No. Dept. Description Code PLAN BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999 ICP1999-020004 Plans Review Fee CO BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999 ICP1999-020004 Certificate ot Occupancy SIMP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999 ICP1999-020004 Sewer Impact Fee STAT BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999 ICP1999-020004 State Surcharge TIMP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999 ICP1999-020004 Transportation Impact Fee Revenue Create Created Account No. Date By 010-322108 3/12/1999 JMC 010-322108 3/12/1999 JMC 421-3433525 3/12/1999 JMC 010-208215 3/12/1999 JMC 142-344941 3/12/1999 JMC Page 9 of 12 Amt. Due $115.00 $25.00 $900.00 $4.80 $1,223.52 1/15/2002 2:Ht:35 PM Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 Fees Fee Case Start End Trans. Revenue Create Created Type Type Date Date Case No. Dept. Description Code Account No. Date By Amt. Due PERM BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999 ICP1999-020004 Permit Fee 010-322108 3/12/1999 JMC $300.00 WIMP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999 ICP1999-020004 Water Impact Fee 421-0343323 3/15/1999 JMC $480.00 OIMC BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/1999ICP1999-020004 Development Impact 142-343951 3/15/1999 JMC $250.00 Fee-Comm PERU BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Permit Upgrade Fee 010-322108 12/2/ 1999 RLG $133.00 STAT BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 State Surcharge 010-208215 12/2/1999 RLG $8.64 .RP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Plan Amend-Revw Repl 010-322108 12/2/1999 RLG $50.00 Plans/hr MC BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Development Impact 142-343951 12/2/ 1999 RLG $250.00 Fee-Comm RE01 BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Reinspection Fee (1st) 010-322108 12/9/1999 FR $30.00 RE01 BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Reinspection Fee (1st) 010-322108 3/10/2000 JMC $32.00 PACC BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Plan Amend-Chg per 010-322108 8/24/2000 JMC $26.00 Contractor EXTD BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Permit Extension 8/24/2000 JMC $30.00 TIMP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Transportation Impact Fee 142-344941 9/8/2000 M_G $0.00 TIMP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Transportation Impact Fee 142-344941 9/8/2000 M_G $1,838.42 PACP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Plan Amend-Chg Permit 010-322108 9/12/2000 TAW $265.00 Plans/hr PACP BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Plan Amend-Chg Permit 010-322108 11/1/2000 JMC $159.00 Plans/hr RE01 BCP 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 ICP1999-020004 Reinspection Fee (1st) 010-322108 12/26/2000 K_B $32.00 _tes Notes Plans Examiner has met several times with Owner who has an expired permit and a new contractor (different from Contractor who initiated Building Construction Permit). Plans Examiner repeatedly recommended to owner that he engage a FL professional engineer or registered architect to make sure that code compliance can be achieved and that proposed building addition is feasible. Plans examiner has repeatedly emphasized to owner that compliance to ALL applicable codes must be achieved and that, in some cases, the various codes may have dissimilar definitions and/or requirements. To date, a MINIMUM of 4 hours (& counting) has gone into this plan amendment. ken REC'D A LETTER FROM TERRENCE DRUNASKY OF TERRENCE EDWARD HOMES INC. HE IS THE CONTRACTOR OF RECORD AS OF 8/23/00. 9-11-2000 FEES PAID BY CASH (CREDIT CARD DECLINED) TW CONTRACTOR HAS PULLED OFF THIS JOB THIS DATE. LETTER IN FILE. PUT ON RED TAG STATUS WITH ROB HAYS UNTIL NEW LICENSED CONTRACTOR IS ON THIS JOB. Page 10 of 12 1/15/2002 2:1~:35 PM Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 Notes Notes Today, Tues 09/12/2000, a Stop Work Order was issued to a Mr. Tom Selhorst by P&DS Bldg Inspector. After city staff had been working with applicant for countless meetings & hours to process his Plan Amendment (application for a 744 sq ft metal bldg addition to exist 480 sq ft masonry bldg). Someone, other than Contractor of Record (without Contractor's knowledge), began constructing foundation & related site work prior to plan amend being released and without inspections. After a site inspection, Contractor of Record (the second) has removed himself from the project (letter in proj file). Staff time & effort on this plan amendment appears to have been completely WASTED and IGNORED. Staff involved with review of this project may want to take note of this. Typically, when a Contractor removes themself a new BCP is required in order to accurately track progress, inspections & the accountability of the license holder. Building ADDITIONS are always a separate BCP. ..t!though the applicanUowner could not have received better service anywhere, I am anticipating the applicant to complain to city hall. ken "AN AMENDMENT FEE ASSESSED BY KEN S - 5 HRS X $53/ HR = $265.00 NO NOC NEEDED duplicate permit placard issued - original was misplaced - customer service PER KEVIN G; PLAN AMEND #1---NEW 2 CAR GARAGE FOR PARKING, LADDERS, WHEEL BARROWS AND MOWERS WITH CRUSHED ASPHALT DRIVE; PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING (24X36X10/12) WITH CONCRETE PIERS ATTACHED TO EXISTING BUILDING; ADDED VALUE OF $6,254 (FROM $24,696 TO $30,950); 864 SF MORE (480SF + 864SF = 1344SF); NO TRADES; NO SLAB---SUBMITTED TODAY BY TOM SELHORST; NEED CONTRACTOR TO PICK UP PERMIT OR NOTARIZED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION AND NEEDS $; PERMIT FEE UPGRADE INCLUDES PLAN REVIEW FEE AND PERMIT FEE ($61 AND $72 = $133); $8.64 FOR RADON AND $50 IS THE MINIMUM, WHICH COULD BE MORE (DEPENDING ON KEN'S FINAL CALCULATIONS), FOR PLAN AMENDMENT FEE; PER KEVIN GALL OTHER IMPACT FEES APPLY ALSO. PER MIKE GUST; AN ADDITIONAL TIF DUE $2,134.94 FOR NEW BUILDING. THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL TIF DUE ON THE PLAN AMEND. BUILDING ADDITION, PER MIKE GUST. spoke with vern reguarding c/o, okay to issue after fire review, do not need roof or mechanical sub cards, owner did roof,no mechanial at site.akr 02/26/2001 ELECTRICAL RED TAG PAID BY TOM SEHLHORST ($32.00) THIS DATE. .7/19/00, Tom Selhorst, Ralph, Stone, Lisa Fierce and Mark Parry met to discuss this permit. It was agreed that the proposed 1,300 square t building shown on the submitted site plan was originally submitted as part of a variance under the previous code (previous to the code adopted on Jan 21, 1999). It was agreed that there were extensions granted for this variance and that a building permit was applied for under that variance. The site plan as submitted has been reviewed by and apporved by Planning Staff. The landscape plan as submitted has been reviewed by and approved by Staff. Construction documents and other details may still be required by the Building Official for final permitting - contact Kevin Garriott at 562.4588- Additional site pans and/or landscape plans may be required for Job, Office and Landscape records. Questions concerning this note may be directed to Mark Parry, Lisa Fierce or Ralph Stone (in that order) -- Mark T. Parry, Planner RECV'D TWO (2) NOTES FOR FILE FROM MATT TIERNAN building plan amend #1 is for the slab and footing. There was a SWO issued by Vern Packer for foundation work without a permit. So this amend is being charged $53.00 x 3 = $159.00. The review for the metal building is $265.00. Mike Gust - Traffic C/O approval based on approved plan which does not provide for any vehicle access use between the building and Pinellas Trail plan amendment received and approved for concrete slab for parking. One handicap space and one regular space. Plan Ammendment Submitted on 1/31/2001 after being approved through DRC Engineering (Mike Gust) and Zoning (John Schod.) have Signed off on this Ammendment. I am placing it in the address file because the original plans have been microfiched. Page 11 of 12 1/15/2002 2:1~:35 PM Information Summary for Case #: BCP1999-020004 . Attached Parcel(s) Parcel No. 09-29-15-25542-005-0000 Section Township Range Subdivsion 09 29 15 ELDRIDGE. J J Role Type Last Name First M.1. Name Address 1 Address 2 CON .CFC025577 FRIEND'S PLUMBING 40351 US 19 N #309 INC . ; KOSLOSKI,D&C;RUGGIERO,V;; SCHNORR,T;JOHNSON,HMANLEY G;CONLEY,B;CHUMLEY T .CGC056700 MAINTENANCE PO BOX 86755 RESOURCE SERVICES CON .ER0008021 People Listing City TARPON SPRINGS TEANO, GEORGE R. 7202 AMHURST WAY CLEARWATER MADEIRA BEACH ROBERTS, MATTHEW L OWN SEHLHORST, TOM & ROBINSON, H. 611 PALM BLUFF ST Owner Contact: OUT TO BID . Page 12 of 12 CLEARWATER State FL Block Lot 005 005 Zip Phone 1 34689 (727) 786-4462 FL 33738 (941) 286.3162 FL 33764.7001 (727) 536-2041 FL 34615 (813) 461-9736 Ext. 1 Phone 2 (727) 787-9170 (727) 393.7767 Company Ext. 2 Name Hold KOSLOSKI, MONTY No Hold LINN, UH No Hold TEANO, GEORGE R., No Hold UH No Hold Primary N Y N . . CDB Meeting Date: March 19, 2002 Case Number: APP 02-01-01 Agenda Item: C 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUMMARY OF EVENTS GENERAL INFORMATION: OWNER/APPLICANT/ APPELLANT: Tom Selhorst LOCATION: 1050 North Myrtle Avenue REQUEST: Appeal of a denial of an occupational license for vehicle service use within the Commercial District for the property located at 1050 North Myrtle A venue, under the appeal provisions of Section 4- 501 of the Community Development Code. BASIS OF STAFF'S DECISION: This 0.109-acre site is located on the west side of North Myrtle Avenue, east of Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail, approximately 200 feet north of Cedar Street. The site contains an existing 1,344 square foot, one-story building. This case is an appeal of a denial of an occupational license for vehicle service use in the Commercial District. The site is zoned Commercial District with an underlying land use designation of CG, Commercial General Classification. The Commercial District permits the following minimum standard uses: governmental uses, indoor recreation/entertainment, marinas, offices, overnight accommodations, parks and recreation facilities, places of worship, restaurants, retail sales/services, and vehicle sales/display. Additional uses are permitted under the Flexible Standard Development and Flexible Development provisions. Vehicle service, however, is not permitted in the Commercial District under any provisions. (Refer to Article 2, Division 7, Commercial District, Exhibit A.) The occupational license application was denied by the Planning Department on December 31, 2001 because the vehicle service use as requested is not permitted in the Commercial zoning district (refer to application for occupation license, Exhibit B). The Code defines vehicle service as an activity conducted entirely within an enclosed structure primarily involved in servicing or repairing automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, boats, recreational vehicles and other similarly sized vehicular transport mechanisms or heavy machinery. Vehicle services include washing, waxing, changing oil, tuning, installing mufflers or detailing, window tinting, shock absorbers, and painting. (Refer to the vehicle service definition in the Code, Exhibit C.) The vehicle service use is permitted in the IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology District (Refer to a portion of the use chart in the Code, Exhibit D.) Page 1 . . OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE HISTORY: On March 1, 2001, Tom Selhorst (appellant) submitted an application for occupational license for the subject property. The application was for an individual business that was described as "repair and service, no vehicle service or repair, includes handyman". (Refer to occupational license permit application OCL-0007484, Exhibit E.) The application was approved by all applicable City departments. The Planning Department (zoning) conditionally approved the application as a contractor's office, which is permitted under the Commercial District, with a condition that no repair or service of equipment or vehicles is permitted on this site. On May 25, 2001, Glass America LLC submitted an application for occupational license for the same site. The description of the business on the application stated "auto glass replacement work done off premises - no work done on site - no outdoor storage - office use only." This application was approved by all City departments, including Planning, as an office use. It is permitted under the Commercial District provisions. (Refer to occupational license permit application OCL-0008018, Exhibit F.) APPEAL PROCESS: This appeal was filed on December 31,2001 by the property owner, Mr. Tom Selhorst. (Refer to the letter and application for proposed use submitted - Exhibits G and H.) Section 4-205.C. of the Community Development Code provides that a denial of an occupational license may be appealed in the manner provided in Article 4 Division 5. Section 4-501 A.4. of the Community Development Code states that the Community Development Board has the authority to review appeals from denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions of the Code. Section 4- 502.B. provides that an application/notice of appeal of any decision of the City, as provided in Section 4-501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Section 4-504 states that upon receipt of the recommendation of the Community Development Coordinator (regarding appeals from decisions set out in Section 4-501.A.) the Community Development Board shall review the application, the recommendation of the Community Development Coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application in accord with Section 4-206 (notice and public hearings) and render a decision. The Community Development Code and Code of Ordinances have two inconsistent appeal procedures. (A code amendment will be needed to address the issue.) In addition to the process as discussed above, Section 29.44 (Appeals) of the Code of Ordinances states that any applicant or licensee who has been denied the issuance of an occupational license pursuant to Section 29.31,29.38, or 29.41(5) shall have the right of appeal to the City Manager. The decision of the City Manager shall be final and conclusive, subject to judicial review. The appellant was given the choice of either of the two appeal procedures. He first chose the hearing by the Assistant City Manager and it was held on January 24, 2002. (Refer to meeting minutes of the Administrative Hearing - Exhibit I.) During that meeting, the applicant decided to pursue the appeal process through the Community Development Board. Pursuant to Section 4-504.C. of the Community Development Code, in order to grant an appeal, overturning or modifying the decision appealed from, the Community Development Board shall find that based on substantial competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party: Page 2 . . 1) The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of the Community Development Code; 2) That the decision will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Community Development Code; and 3) Will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Prepared by Planning Department staff: r i, J (.). I~./. il/fj A' .'1'." -1[/:/1 ~ U 7"J.~,,--- : I ~ tisa L. Fierd, Assistant Planning Director ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Zoning Atlas Map Application Exhibits A-I S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\APPEALSlMyrtle N 1050 SehlhorsfIMyrtle N 1050 STAFF REPORT appeal.doc Page 3 . . S 2-603 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Clearwater with convenient access to goods and services throughout the city without adversely impacting the integrity of residential neighbor- hoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the city or negatively impacting the safe and efficient move- ment of people and things within the City of Clearwater. Section 2-701.1. Maximum development po- tential. DIVISION 7. COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ("C") The Commercial District ("C") may be located in more than one land use cat~gory. It is the intent of the C District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the C District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. Development potential for the Countywide Fu- ture Land Use Designations that apply to the C District are as follows: Section 2-701. Intent and purpose. The intent. and purpose of the Commercial District is to provide the citizens of the City of Countywide Future Maximum Dwelling Units Maximum Floor Area Ratio I Overnight Accommodations Land Use Designation per Acre of Land Impervious Surface Ratio Units per Acre Commercial Neighborhood 10 dwelling units per acre FAR AO/ISR .80 N/A Commercial Limited 18 dwelling units per acre FAR A5/ISR .85 30 units per acre Commercial General . 24 dwelling units per acre FAR .55/ISR .95 40 units per acre Residential/OfficelRetaiI 18 dwelling units per acre FAR AO/ISR .85 30 units per acre Section 2-702. Minimum standard develop- ment. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the "C" District subject to the minimum standards set out in this section and other appli- cable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-702. .C" District Minimum Development Standards Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) ( ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking Spaces Governmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4/1,000 SF GFA 5/1000 SF GFA Indoor Recreation! Entertain- 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 or 5llane, ment 2/court or 1/ma- chine Marinas 5,000 50 25 15 10 20 1 space per 2 slips Supp. No.1 ~~ i bf.f246 A IA" . . ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-703 Table 2-702. "C" District Minimum Development Standards Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) ( ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking Spaces Offices 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4/1,000 SF GFA Overnight Accommodations 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 lIunit 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as determined by the community Parks and recreational facilities n/a n/a 25 25 10 20 development coordinator based on ITE Manual stan- dards Places of Worship 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 1 per 2 seats Restaurants 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 15/1,000 SF GFA Retail Sales and Services 10,000 100 25 25 10 120 5/1,000 SF GFA Vehicle Sales/Display 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 2.5/1,000 SF Lot Area (1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to institutional which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. COrd. No. 6526-00, S 1,6-15-00) Section 2-703. Flexible standard develop- ment. and criteria set out in this Section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the "C" District subject to the standards Table 2-703. "C" District Flexible Standard Development Standard Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) ( ft.) Front (ft.)* (ft.) (ft.) Parking Spaces Accessory Dwellings n/a nJa n/a nJa nJa n/a 1 space per unit Adult Uses 5,000 50 25 25 10 20 5 per 1,000 GFA Alcoholic Beverage Sales 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5 per 1,000 GFA Automobile Service Stations 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5/1,000 SF GFA Educational Facilities 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 1 per 2 stu- dents Governmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 25-50 25 10 20 4 spaces per 1,000 GFA Supp. No.1 CD2:47 &.kt bIt A t.AtII . . S 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Table 2.703. "C" District Flexible Standard Deuelopment Standard Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft.) Front (ft.)* (ft.) ( ft.) Parking Spaces 3-5/1000 SF Indoor Recreation/Entertain- 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 GFA or 3-5/ ment lane, 1-2/court or l/machine Marina Facilities 5,000-20,000 50 25 25 10 20 1 space per 2 slips Medical clinics 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 2-3/1,000 GFA Nightclubs 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 10,000 100 25-50 25 0-10 10-20 3-4 spaces per 1,000 GFA Off-Street Parking 10,000 100 nJa 25 10 20 nJa Outdoor Retail Sales, Display 20,000 100 25 25 10 20 10 per 1,000 of and/or Storage land area Overnight Accommodations 20,000-40,000 150-200 25-50 25 0-10 10-20 1 per unit Places of Worship(2) 20,000- 100-200 25-50 25 10 20 .5-1 per 2 seats 40,000 Public Transportation Facili- nJa nJa 10 nJa nJa nJa nJa ties(3) Restaurants 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-35 25 0-10 10-20 7-15 spaces per 1,000 GFA Retail Sales and Services 3,500-10,000 35-100 25-35 25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per 1,000 GFA Utility/Infrastructure Facili- nJa nJa 20 25 10 20 nJa ties( 4) 2.5 spaces per Vehicle Sales/Displays 20,000-40,000 150-200 25 25 10 20 1;000 of lot area Veterinary Offices or Animal 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4 spaces per Grooming and Boarding 1,000 GFA *The front setback may be reduced to 15 feet for parking lots provided the land area is not sufficient to accommodate the full setback requirement and the reduction results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and landscaping is in excess of the minimum required. (1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (2) Places of worship shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (3) Public transportation facilities shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to TransportationlUtility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. Supp. No.1 CD2:48 f:.t,k.1I it A ~,~ e . ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-703 (4) Utility/Infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. Flexibility criteria: A. Accessory dwelling. One accessory dwelling, which is subordinate and accessory to a principal permitted use provided that: 1. Title to the accessory dwelling is vested in the ownership of the principal use; The floor area of the accessory dwelling does not exceed 25 percent of the floor area of the principal use. 2. B. Adult uses. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on U.S. 19; 2. The use complies with each and every requirement of Division 3 of Article 3. C. Alcoholic beverage sales. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or a public or private school, unless the floor area of the use which is devoted to the display and storage of alcoholic beverages is less than ten percent of the total floor area of the use and there is no signage located on the parcel proposed for devel- opment which identifies the use as a loca- tion where alcoholic beverages are sold; 3. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or a public or private school unless the inter- vening land uses, structures or context are such that the location of the alcoholic beverage sales is unlikely to have an adverse impact on such school or use as a place of worship. Supp. No.1 CD2:49 ~k\J,tt A D. Automobile service stations. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The use does not involve the overnight, outdoor storage of automobiles; 3. No more than two service bays front on a public street. E. Educational facilities. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a road with at least four lanes; 2. The proposed development does not have an access which connects to a local street at a point more than 100 feet from the four lane road on which the parcel pro- posed for development fronts. F. Governmental uses. 1. Height. a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any contiguous residential prop- erty. G. Indoor recreation I entertainment. 1. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses ofthe property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significan t portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. If /'1 . . S 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE H. Marina facilities. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not located in areas identified in the Com- prehensive Plan as areas of environmen- tal significance including: a. The north end of Clearwater Beach; b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds; c. Cooper's Point; Clearwater Harbor spoil islands; Sand Key Park; d. e. f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake. 2. No commercial activities other than the mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be permitted on any parcel of land which is contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas, unless the marina facility is totally screened from view from the contiguous land which is designated as residential and the hours of operation of the commer- cial activities are limited to the time pe- riod between sunrise and sunset. 3. Lot area: The parcel proposed for develop- ment was an existing lot of less than 20,000 square feet and was not in com- mon ownership with any contiguous prop- erty on May 1,1998 or the reduction in lot width will not result in a facility which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 1. Medical clinics. 1. The use and design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the surrounding area. 2. Off-street parhing: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses ofthe property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. Supp. No.1 CD2:50 ~'b,t A J. Offices. 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping area in excess of the minimum required or improved design and appearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. Side and rear setbach: 2. a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 3. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building are for storage or other non-parking demand gen- eration purposes. K. Nightclubs. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for purposes of a place of wor- ship or a public or private school unless the intervening land uses, structures or context are such that the location of the nightclub is unlikely to have an adverse impact on such school or use as a place of worship. t;'~ . . ZONING DISTRICTS L. Off-street parking. 1. Access to and from the parking lot shall be based on the size and design of the lot and approved by the Community Devel- opment Coordinator. 2. All outdoor lighting is so designed and located so that no light fixtures cast light directly on to adjacent land. 3. If the parking lot is adjacent to residen- tially used or zoning property, such off- street parking spaces shall be screened by a wall or fence of at least four feet in height which is landscaped on the exter- nal side with a continuous hedge or non- deciduous vine. M. Outdoor retail sales, display and lor stor- age. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas unless the principal use is the sale of living plant material; 2. No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line ofthe parcel proposed for development unless such sign age is a part of an approved comprehensive sign pro- gram; 3. All buildings located on the parcel pro- posed for development are finished or painted in earth tone colors; 4. No cyclone, chainlink or other metal mesh fences are located on the parcel proposed for development; 5. All fences, excluding gates, are land- scaped on the exterior of such fences with continuous shrubs or vines and trees lo- cated 20 feet on center; 6. No goods and materials other than living plant material which are stored or dis- played outside a building or structure are located within a required setback; Supp. No.1 CD2:51 ft.... b.+ A. 9 2-703 7. The parcel proposed for outdoor storage or display fully conforms to the require- ments of Article 3 Division 7 in regard to landscaping; 8. The height of non-living goods and mate- rials stored or displayed outdoors shall not exceed 15 feet; 9. No building materials or automobile parts or supplies which are stored or displayed outdoors shall be visible from a public right-of-way. N. Overnight accommodations. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program. 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; .111 . --, . S 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE b. The reduction in side or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side or rear setback does not reduce the amount ofland- scaped area otherwise required. O. Places of worship. Lot area: a. The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- posed for development; b. The reduction in lot area does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; c. The reduction in lot area results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and ap- pearance; d. The reduction in lot area does not reduce the daylnight activity level along building facades on public streets. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 1. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. Off-street parking: The total number of off-street parking spaces including off-site parking spaces within 600 feet of the parcel proposed for development will be available on a shared basis to meet the peak period demands of the facility. 4. Supp. No. 1 CD2:52 Ec.lu.~ Ie 5. Lot width. The parcel proposed for devel- opment was an existing lot of less than 200 feet and was not in common owner- ship with any contiguous property on May 1, 1998 or the reduction in lot width will not result in building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for devel- opment. P. Public transportation facilities. 1. The public transportation facilities are not located within 1,000 feet of another public transportation facility unless nec- essary to serve established transit stops with demonstrated ridership demand; 2. The public transportation facilities are designed, located and landscaped so that the structures are. screened from view from any residential use or land desig- nated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. Any lighting associated with the public transportation facilities is designed and located so that no light is cast directly on any residential use or land designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. Q. Restaurants. 1. Lot area and width: The parcel proposed for development was an existing lot ofless than 10,000 square feet and was not in common ownership with any contiguous property on May 1, 1998 or the reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing build- ings in the immediate vicinity of the par- cel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minim urn re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; .,h~ . . ZONING DISTRICTS b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 6. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- mg purposes; b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the num- ber of off-street parking spaces. R. Retail sales and service. 1. Lot size and width: The parcel proposed for development was an existing lot ofless than 10,000 square feet and was not in common ownership with any contiguous property on May 1, 1998. 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- Supp. No.1 CD2:53 fLh\bt A S 2-703 eas m excess of the mInImum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance; 3. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any contiguous residential prop- erty. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions ofthe building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. s. Utility I infrastructure facilities. 1. No above ground structures are located adjacent to a street right-of-way; 2. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees and hedges which five years after installation will substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure. T. Vehicle sales ldisplays. 1. The gross floor area of enclosed buildings is at least 7,000 square feet; .9 ,,~ e . S 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. No area suitable for the display of vehi- cles for sale is located within the front setback of the parcel proposed for devel- opment; 4. Provision is made to dim outdoor lighting at all times when the automobile sales and service uses is not open to the public to that level necessary to maintain the security of the premises; 5. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street. u. Veterinary offices, or animal grooming I boarding. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment does not involve animal confine- ment facilities that are open to the out- side. (Ord. No. 6417-99, S 3, 8-19-99; Ord. No. 6526-00, S 1, 6-15-00) Section 2-704. Flexible development. The following uses are Level Two permitted uses in the "C" District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-704. "COO District Flexible Development Standards Min. Lot Max. Min. Min. Lot Area Width Height Front Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 5 per 1,000 GFA Determined by the community development Comprehensive Infill coordinator nJa nJa nJa nJa nJa nJa based on the Redevelopment Project(1) specific use and/or ITE Manual stan- dards Light Assembly 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per 1,000 GFA Limited Vehicle Service 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per 1,000 GFA Mixed Use 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per 1,000 GFA Nightclubs 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 3--4 spaces per 1,000 GFA Off-Street Parking 10,000 100 nJa 15-25 0-10 10-20 nJa Supp. No.1 CD2:54 eac.kl~ A ..1'1 . . ZONING DISTRICTS ~ 2-704 Table 2-704. "C" District Flexible Development Standards Min. Lot Max. Min. Min. Lot Area Width Height Front Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) ( ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking 1-10 per 1,000 SQ FT of land area or as de- Outdoor Recreation/Entertain- termined by the 20,000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 community de- ment velopment coor- dinator based on ITE Manual standards Ovemight Accommodations 20,000--40,000 100-200 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 1 per unit Problematic Uses 5,000 50 25 15-25 10 10-20 5 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA Restaurants 3,500-10,000 35-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 7-15 spaces per 1,000 GFA Retail Sales and Services 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 4--5 spaces per 1,000 GFA RV Parks 40,000 200 25 15-25 20 10-20 1 space per RV space 1 per 20 units Self Storage 20,000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 plus 2 for manager's of- fice Social/Public Service Agen- 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 3-4 spaces per cies(2) 1,000 GFA Refer to Telecommunication Towers 10,000 100 section 25 10 20 n/a 3-2001 2.5 spaces per Vehicle SaleslDisplays 10,000-40,000 100-200 25 15-25 10 10-20 1,000 SQ FT of lot area Veterinary Offices or Grooming 5,000---10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0---10 10-20 4 spaces per and Boarding 1,000 GFA (1) Any use approved for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project shall be permitted by the underlying Future Land Use Plan Map designation. (2) Social/public service agencies shall not exceed five acres. Flexibility criteria: A. Alcoholic beverage sales. 1. Location: a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or public or private school unless the floor area ofthe use which is devoted to the display and storage of alcoholic beverages is less than ten percent of the total floor area of the use and there is no signage lo- cated on the parcel proposed for de- Supp. No.3 CD2:55 10"" 6t. ~\l bit A jf,- e . 9 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE velopment which identifies the use 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill as a location where alcoholic bever- redevelopment project are otherwise per- ages are sold; mitted in the City of Clearwater; c. The parcel proposed for development 4. The uses or mix of uses within the COll- is not located within 500 feet of a prehensive infill redevelopment project parcel of land used for a place of are compatible with adjacent land uses; worship or a public or private school unless the intervening land uses, 5. Suitable sites for development or redevel- structures or context are such that opment of the uses or mix of uses within the location ofthe alcoholic beverage the comprehensive infill redevelopment sales is unlikely to have an adverse project are not otherwise available in the impact on such school or use as a City of Clearwater; place of worship; 6. The development of the parcel proposed d. The use of the parcel proposed for for development as a comprehensive infill development will not involve direct redevelopment project will upgrade the access to a major arterial street; immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed 2. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot for development; area and/or will not result in a building 7. The design of the proposed comprehen- which is out of scale with existing build- ings in the immediate vicinity of the par- sive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the cel proposed for development. community character of the immediate 3. Front setback: The reduction in front set- vicinity of the parcel proposed for devel- back results in an improved site plan or opment and the City of Clearwater as a improved design and appearance. whole; 4. Side and rear setback: 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required a. The reduction in side and rear set- setbacks, height and off-street parking back does not prevent access to the are justified by the benefits to community rear of any building by emergency character and the immediate vicinity of vehicles; the parcel proposed for development and b. The reduction in side and rear set- the City of Clearwater as a whole; back results in an improved site plan, 9. Adequate off-street parking in the imme- more efficient parking layout or im- mate vicinity according to the shared park- proved design and appearance and ing formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will landscaped areas are in excess of the be available to avoid on-street parking in minimum required. the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- B. Comprehensive infill redevelopment projects. posed for development. 1. The development or redevelopment ofthe C. Light assembly. parcel proposed for development is other- 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot wise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development stan- area and/or width will not result in a dards; building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of 2. The development of the parcel proposed the parcel proposed for development. for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not materially 2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- reduce the fair market value of abutting back results in an improved site plan or properties; improved design and appearance. Supp. No.3 CD2:56 Eikt,* ,. " "1 . 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles; Supp. No.3 &hI bet ZONING DISTRICTS CD2:56.1 A . S 2-704 .. "" . . ZONING DISTRICTS b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or im- proved design and appearance and landscaping areas are in excess of the minimum required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses ofthe property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 5. The parcel proposed for development shall have no outdoor storage of goods, materi- als and products. 6. The parcel proposed for development shall have no process carried on within the building which causes any external nega- tive impact with regard to noise, fumes, or odors. 7. The building design of the parcel pro- posed for development shall be architec- turally compatible with the surrounding area. D. Limited vehicle service. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the mini- mum required. 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles; The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- b. Supp. No.1 S 2-704 proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 5. Garage doors and bays shall be located perpendicular to the abutting streets. Bays shall be screened from adjacent property by landscaped walls or fences. 6. The facade of the building which fronts on public roads are designed with windows, cornices or other architectural features or treatments. 7. The use does not involve the overnight, outdoor storage of automobiles. 8. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. 9. The design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the sur- rounding area. E. Mixed use. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- CD2:57 E:Ulb<< A I ~ 1 ,~ . I . ~ 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE proved design appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building are used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 5. The increased height results in an im- proved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required or im- proved design and appearance. F. Nightclubs. 1. Location: a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or a public or private school unless the intervening land uses, structures or context are such that the location of the nightclub is un- likely to have an adverse impact on such school or use as a place of worship; c. The use of the parcel proposed for development has frontage on an ar- terial street but will not involve di- rect access to a major arterial street; 2. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Front setback. The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. Supp. No.1 E lktbUt CD". 4. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. G. Offices. 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 2. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such sign age is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than 1""1 . . ZONING DISTRICTS otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes. 5. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved appearance and landscaped ar- eas are in excess of the minimum re- quired. H. Off-street parking. I. Access to and from the parking lot shall be based on the size and design of the lot and approved by the community develop- ment coordinator. 2. All outdoor lighting is so designed and located so that no light fixtures cast light directly onto adjacent land. 3. If the parking lot is adjacent to residen- tially used or zoning property, such off- street parking spaces shall be screened by a wall or fence of at least four feet in height which is landscaped on the exter- nal side with a continuous hedge or non- deciduous vine. 1. Outdoor recreation I entertainment. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. All sign age is a part of a comprehensive Sign program; 3. Sound amplification is designed and con- structed to ensure that no amplified sound can be heard to the extent that the sound is recognizable in meaning of words or the melody of music or when wind conditions are less than ten miles per hour at a instance of more than 100 feet in all directions. or when wind conditions are Supp. No.1 CD2:59 6.1;6;" A S 2-704 ten miles per hour or greater, at a dis- tance of more than 150 feet in all direc- tions; 4. All outdoor lighting is designed and con- structed so that no light falls directly on land other than the parcel proposed for development; 5. Off-street parking: The operational char- acter of the outdoor recreation! entertain- ment use and the location of the parcel proposed for development is such that the likely use of the property will require fewer parking spaces per land area than otherwise required or that significant por- tions of the land will be used for passive or other non-parking demand-generating pur- poses. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 7. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. J. Overnight accommodations. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; ."A.. . . S 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 4. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such sign age is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 6. K. Problematic uses. 1. Location. a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The use is not located within 500 feet of another problematic use; 2. Design. a. The building in which the use is located is painted or otherwise fin- ished in materials and colors which are muted; b. There are no security bars on the outside of doors or windows which are visible from a public right-of- way; 3. Signs. Any signage which has a height of greater than six feet is a part of a compre- hensive sign program; 4. The building in which the use is located is a building which is conforming to all cur- rent land development and building reg- ulations. 5.. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles. b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 6. L. Restaurants. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adj acent residential prop- erty. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; b. &It;6 1+60 A ,l.t I VI Supp. No 1 . . ZONING DISTRICTS 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 6. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- ing purposes; b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the num- ber of off-street parking spaces. 7. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. M. Retail sales and service. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance; Supp. No.1 CD2:61 S 2-704 b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of the proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- mg purposes; b. -Convenience retail shall not be eligi- ble for a reduction in the number of off-street parking spaces. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 4. 5. N. RV parks. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The perimeter of the RV Park is screened to a height of four feet by a landscaped wall or fence so that headlamps from automobiles in the off-street parking area can not project into adjacent properties and streets; 3. All outdoor lighting is designed and lo- cated so that light fixtures do not cast light directly on to adjacent land used for residential purposes; ELhi';.-f A ,,1/1 . . S 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 4. All waste disposal containers which serve the use are located within a landscaped enclosed structure. 5. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 6. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. O. Self storage. 1. Access doors to individual storage units are located within a building or are screened from view from adjacent prop- erty or public rights-of-way by landscaped walls or fences located no closer to the property lines of the parcel proposed for development than five feet. 2. The parcel proposed for development does not abut land which is designated or used for residential purposes. 3. The facades of the building in which the individual storage units are located which front on public roads are designed with windows, cornices, retail sales and service uses or other architectural features or treatments. 4. Vehicular access to the parcel proposed for development shall be by way of a local or collector street. The local/collector street shall not be located more than 100 feet from an arterial street. 5. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of the proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for non-parking demand gen- erating purposes. Supp. No.1 CD2:62 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 7. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- suIts in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. P. Social I public service agencies. 1. The parcel proposed for development does not abut any property designated as res- idential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The socialJpublic service agency shall not be located within 1,500 feet of another social/public service agency. 3. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing build- ings in the immediate vicinity of the par- cel proposed for development. 4. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking layout or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. Q. Telecommunication towers. 1. No telecommunication tower is located on Clearwater Beach. 2. If the telecommunication tower is located within a scenic corridor designated by the 1S1J" b,f A '&/'1 . . ZONING DISTRICTS City of Clearwater or a scenic noncommer- cial corridor designated by the Pinellas Planning Council, the applicant must dem- onstrate compliance with the design cri- teria in those designations. 3. The design and construction of the tele- communication tower complies with the standards in Article 3 Division 21. R. Vehicle sales I displays. 1. The gross floor area of enclosed buildings is at least 4,000 square feet; 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. The display of vehicles for sale shall be located within an enclosed building; 4. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street. 5. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. O. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 7. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. s. Veterinary offices, grooming and boarding. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; Supp. No.1 CD2:63 6c.h, b,.,. S 2-801.1 2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment does not involve animal confine- ment facilities that are open to the out- side. 3. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 4. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 5. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. (Ord. No. 6526-00, S 1, 6-15-00) A 14 111 ease Print or "I' South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, t-L jjfbo LY hone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727)12-4576 'PL" ATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LIcENSE NING & DEvaOPM~o vcs CIlYOF ~lt;n DEe 3 1 2001 Owner/Qualifier Name: fOWL ~e HLA/(J~6T {U&~~TI1 mY~TL-~ Ave . Street ~( A- " , . State I . Date of Bi~: , ~ rt(J '-!7 Mailing address: ?" !{~.U Street Number A \ J l. t... ({ :;ity . jUite or Apt # :; 2 ('- '- , \) .J Zip Code Business Name: :2/ I IT /" ( /\1 .-.J) :;ornplete Company Name I .4- tMe~ ( ( f1 Business Address: IO~O AJ 0 Ii t~~ lAir ~T CP 14 ve Street Nam(c ( J1. State Suite or Apt # Street NumbeL W ) ~. { Jlty Zip Code :)wner Home Phone: Business Phone: . Date of Business Opening: ~rea Code Number Area code Number Month/Day/Year ndividual 0 Partnership 0 Corporation l8J Please list officers and tiUes: :::ertification number (if required): certify that the informa~ion given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this lpplication may result in denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the :::ity licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify I am the business owner or owner's legal agent. ~f)~l(.t)f!luJMdT 0~OntA-5 jtt.sellU(!}I2~{ ! iX.-J'{l p( Signature and Title . Print Name Date Approval Zoning Traffic Engineering Building Police FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Category # Fee Date Issued AmI. Paid Total . Owner I Group Fire Health Harbormaster Fic.lCorp. Other - (\0 <:(;0 ~~ . - WCt.A-+s. ~~~k c;;~t ~ W~...Q..l-:R. ~'4-- ;' ~ '^--e-I- Occupational License App.doc <.... l" ~ "\ \ j ~'v\..--t-t-ee U' ~ L-c)J\.,)Z..-V\ \;0Cl od ~k.l.b.t ~ . ~ 8-102 . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ing a telecommunications service to retail custom- ers in the city or providing a government service. Utilities / infrastructure facility means an elec- tric or gas substation, stormwater management facilities, water or wastewater pumping station, telephone repeater station or similar structure used as an intermediary switching, boosting, dis- tribution or transfer station or lines for electricity, cable television, or telephone services between the point of generation and the end user, but not including satellite dish antennas, facilities for the handling of solid waste, or radio, television, or relay towers. Vehicle means any automobile, motorcycle, truck, motorized van, recreation vehicle, bicycle, or any other device on or in which any person or property is or may be transported upon a highway, except devices used exclusively on stationary rails or tracks. *" Vehicle service means an activity conducted entirely within an enclosed structure primarily involved in servicing or repairing of automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, boats, recreational vehicles and other similarly sized vehicular or transport mechanisms or heavy machinery. Vehicle services include washing, waxing, changing oil, tuning, installing muftlers or detailing, window tinting, shock absorbers, and painting. Vehicle service, limited means an activity con- ducted within a structure which primarily in- volves the routine maintenance of automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, boats, and recreational vehi- cles. Limited vehicle service includes only wash- ing, waxing, changing oil, detailing, and window tinting. Vehicle service, major means vehicle repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust mainfold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; re- pair and replacement of transmission, differen- tial, trans axles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; custom- izing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chas- sis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and Supp.No.1 repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines. Vehicle sales I displays means a business or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale or rental of automobiles, small trucks and vans, boats no more than 20 feet in length and other small vehicular or transport mechanisms and including vehicle service. Vehicle salesldisplays, limited means a busi- ness or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale or rental of bicycles, mopeds, and motorcycles and excluding service of such vehi- cles. Vehicle sales / displays, major means a business or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale or rental of boat and marine vessels, recre- ational vehicles, heavy equipment, mobile homes, and other vehicular or transport mechanisms and including vehicle service. Vehicle, inoperative means a vehicle designed to be operated on the public street that is in a state of disrepair and incapable of being moved under its own power, or a vehicle that is incapable of being operated lawfully on the streets of the state. A vehicle shall be deemed inoperative if a current registration tag, also known as a license plate, of a kind required under state law as a condition of operation upon the public streets is not affixed thereto, or if one or more parts which are required for the operation of the vehicle are missing, were dismantled, are inoperative or are not attached to the vehicle as designed. Vested means having the right to develop or continue development notwithstanding the com- prehensive plan or the provisions of this develop- ment code. Veterinary offices means a facility used by vet- erinarians to treat and examine animals, includ- ing accessory indoor boarding of animals. No outdoor kennels or animal runs are allowed. Violation of itinerant or transient nature means a violation that is likely to be temporary, short- lived, and portable in nature or capable of being repeated or that will by its nature dissipate or evidence of which will not be available at a later date, including but not limited to: placement of CD8:34 et"il,;~ C . . ZONING DISTRICTS The following chart is a summary of the uses permitted in each zoning district. The "x" only indicates whether the use is permitted; it does not indicate the nature of the approval required. No use is permitted unless it complies with the provisions of the zoning district in which it is located and the applicable development stan- dards in Article 3 of this Development Code. Supp. No.1 a:~h; bii CD2:3 1:> ./z,. ~ .- ~ -ti o p en c:: 't:l '!=' Z ~ ...... -* l)ISTRlCTS Use Categories LDR LMDR MDR MHDR HDR MHP C T D a I IRT aSR P Telecommunications towers X X X X X TV/radio studios X X - Utility/infrastructure facilities X X X X X X X X X X X X X Vehicle sales/displays X X Vehicle sales/displays, major X Vehicle service .X Vehicle service, major X Veterinary offices X X X Wholesale/distribution/warehouse facility X (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) l.l o Ei:: Ei:: c:: z ~ t:l t?:j ti3 t"" o '1:1 Ei:: t?:j Z '"'l l.l o t:l t?:j . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 MYRTLE AVE. S., CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE . . PLEASE PRINT oT4~~at~NaMKN ~ ( (yeN 0.!ol0:.s, r . Prin Name ~?O~~drNb ~_yv{ vvtl ~TU2- It V'fL. P~nt ~trel(.t t ~ ~u?"ber Street Name (/ Ll/V Print City Business Name: ,!J.--r l--~tQ U U-J Print Name Business Address: c)~ fl;i4{ L- Print S reet Number Date of Birth () I ex ~ . y-( "fA l LV\l A-e L r:'( State .G' {ZN LA( CI€!; T '6 ?/7J~J Zip Street Name Suite/Apt. Print City own7. p.honR:----13 i A ~ II} / 1 t. U/ Area Code Number State Zip Business Pt)Or':. '-1'..7 J ~ Date of Business O"..pening: .:.2. { 6'1 (. -10-7 ::tfLICf tv (// -j~l ')&/ 't.11f;i 'V~ -(Y Month/Day/Year , WI f( (tV\Jl S2A,V { ce. tiC: Area Code ] Individu~ Corporation 0 (list officers and titles) Certification # (if required): I certify that the Information given In this application is complete and accurate. and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application. may result in denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within cl1y and state laws, and to notify the Ci1y licensing division if any of the information I have given chan. ges. I also certify I am the busifless owner ol ~~~.' ga. I agent. . . .. tJ ( '~ Iit~ @r)a2ei# JFlOU(J6VUL~ ~NUJaefF[-; -- . Signature and Title Print Name Date FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BElOW THIS LINE Approval Category It bCj~. DC!CJ Fee Date 155. Amt. Paid Total: 1.5'"0 Owner Group 6JJo ~&:.fl1ll.. 01< SEJ2.\J'ct ~ CLEARWATER ~~k:1. III J.~3S t:Qu.~\ -tl v'e.t+,c.&-~S 'T . -P-fJ,,.... I TTE..l7 O~ -nhs S 17'E. . Brian J. Aungst, Mayor-commissiol:; J.B. Johnson, Vice Ma~mi~er ~ t Clark, Commissioner 1430-0075-GC Ed Hart, Commissione~ ".,1 F. Da erick, Commissioner Rev 12-98 CITY OF CLEARWA-, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Municipal Services Building, 2nd floor 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 \ PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 ~ C~\!Cs'; . <}\J;!pIlICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE ~). Please Print or Type Ownerl,Qualifier Name: 66./6(:; 6'(.-:4:55 (yLp\s,s., ~ 'rY\ '<- .~.\CP\ LLC- . L /. / . . j A . ft ~ Date of Birth: I CY l/~'5S _ff/'t1H /-C/::L_ Mailing address: 11':-:;-/~ s~umber ./'_ IA.. Jri J2v City r/ /~ /'/EIJIf.{t s /(.-4.- Street Name pi- State Ave- Suite or Apt # =?=1h/3 Zip Code Business Name: 6 LA:554nlflt1 cA--- Complete Company Name LLC_ Business Address: /OSC) Street Nym~ ...--:: . C tE .W;<] }M_ City /t/. /7?Y1t/t(~ ~ Stfeet Name FL State Suite or Apt # 3 3 ? .5T Zip Code Area Code Number Business Phone: 7d-1 ~~7- /S-'O / Area code Number Date 9~ Bus~nes~ Opening: (/.) / 30 / c> / Month/DaylY ear Owner Home Phone: Descriltion of Busintjss ~please i~clude, num. ~er of and_type of machines, the address and business n~me ~f m~chine(S) location).:, . /}t(/lJ a/4-6S: ~F/i4C~~!1V'I U;tJyt/( OCIII/'~ tJ;?r h. E41/.f.t-'S- ""./0 W~/( D()I'JE &N ~ 1/:- -',..,VO Ot-rf-DOf?l{ .sTc-J~G - OFFICE" USe; O/Vz:r Individual n Partnershic n Corooration rz:f Please list officers and titles: .;<.y L~ /0/ (' ~ /~;:d-. ~r / //17),/ ;;CV-V.s. Certification number (if reauiredl: I certify that the infonnation given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this . application may result in denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the City licensing division if any of the infonnation I have given changes. I also certify I am the business owner or owner's legal agent. .../;) /J;/U? /p. .-- . ( 1 !~~ 0tiWJ-1 / ((~h.1 ~LA IWI") L flr!....1 -;, r D S - J '5: - p Sign ure and Title ' Print Name Date ~1 Approval FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE o te Category # Fee ~g . ,+-~ 6tJ. ..~-o . Date Issued Amt. Paid ' ;;;$.- , .:sD..:-- J{r y/..-/.~U:;;'-'$'" ~&.. S\aS\O\ ~~ \\- \\ "\,\'\ ~(bi.:L Total Owner Group I ~I I i ~' C). O<J D ......... 0\) Zoning <? -,:r-rafficEnginee~I1~V Building Police Fire Health Harbonnaster (~--(IV fcfJ e\th,be~ F S/Forms 7-99/0ccupational License App li'C' ~ .-.. . .. I" I 1:2 Q&.lte(}T A:f1/eHC 0 f2 /) T~ P :veIL ( A- L .. G f- () <<(-f?g~ . r / ! I~ f) M eel &,r.'.. '---:>:.--fICO -- .-/ t- 'T~e [f t( $ (rlGJ I s~ e k ( /;T( J1 t!:- It jAx 1/ Vv1A-'1 ?tJ~(lJLY- y~tJ0C [) t17 o f C CQAl!_L(/~re k:. · / T- ,(i Pc $ A (j A-~( b f) C-L LltetLS{ A Y\vt> A co., vi ft6 / 'S !5 C{ ~.. {) ~ l/l. /1fIJltJi!t7 L NO fe to ~~Gtl-!)e Itt(~ fir T "-lQ 1lJtt'r (J) 1!JJlII-{S~(OI{ (yW2T7 Yea 1/1,- ,Jit1'\. 0>-00 t- 0 R. -rue P4/i/ '{lIJS( n2.65 Vj-rl,l. f3 {Z. ~ ~~(. __... /"') 11Jj~ ..."c.... ._, I /,'~;" 1 I I (j~&2IL' J) yf / f)f)SIi J/(/; L rz iA ~ I/) (. .e 'df}2t! tt- 'f-fl If 1{ c r\ ~~ 7J':~ .. tf.~ I S.JGJ'--- (!f\ "1(:-- I I / r) (J 'P {)<O ( I if cL. f . _.-~-~-_.._-_. ~------ ~,b.+ G- ,.....-- ~,.;~- CITY . CLEARWATER APPLICATIePQ' FOR PROPOSED U II'! _~J""~" Property Address: 0[;-0 IV rn /!..rl s Proposed Use of Property: Up p,:l 1>. tJ P '~t f /4 t1 () CurreDt/Past Use of Property: ,,,b~ Ot!.L -~ !5() I rr- 1fi!: I? ~ -- a/./~ P.efr;:,/?/~t,ph/(;Yl1cr bmte~ t:./JOht I~ /fV ~ oeL - 000 IJ;J<? tJ /l. e P 1l-17~ ~ee V I C. J.;) Other: Sec. 137.007, Land Development Code, City of Clearwater, and Sec. A103.9, Staudud Building Code, state that . building shall not be occupied prior to issuance of a Certificate of OccupancylUse. Any Pine11as County Transportation Impact Fee must be paid prior to issuance of. Certificate of Occupancy. To the best of my knowledge, I certify that I am authorized to make application for the above-referenced property; that the land, buDding, and accessory structDre(s) meets all applicable buDding, zoning, rll'e, safety, and health codes of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, State of Florida, Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater, and that this property.wiD be used for the purpose(s) stated hereon. t1i~1L4{ /rl -..J., /- D I Date apceU95.kd& ~tb;+ )l . . ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING Occupational License Appeal - Tom Selhorst January 24, 2002 - 2:00 p.m. DRAFT Present: Garry Brumback Leslie Dougall-Sides Cyndi Tarapani Brenda Moses Assistant City Manager Assistant City Attorney Planning Director Board Reporter Also Present: Mark Jacobson Tom Selhorst Glass America Appellant Appellant Exhibits: None City Exhibits: None Assistant City Manager, Garry Brumback, representing City Manager Bill Horne, opened the meeting at 2:01 p.m. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides explained the rules governing the procedures as specified in 29.41 of the City Code of Ordinances. Appellant Tom Selhorst said he would proceed under protest as he had asked his case be heard in front of the City Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Brumback said Mr. Selhorst has 2 options: 1) a City Manager Designee appeal procedure, or 2) file a petition and pay a fee to request the CDB (Community Development Board) review the request for appeal. Mr. Selhorst said he prefers to go before the CDB. Ms. Dougall-Sides said Section 4-501A(4) of the Code of Ordinances specifies criteria regarding denials of licenses. Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani said that section of the Code contains a specific procedure, which requires 4 of the 7 members of the CDB to agree to hear a case, and there are high standards to grant an appeal. Ms. Dougall-Sides said the criteria for granting an appeal by the CDB, states that the CDB must find that the decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions in the Code, the decision would be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Code, and it would not be detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare. An appeal to the CDB requires 4 CDB member votes to pull an item from the Consent Agenda. Ms. Dougall-Sides said there is a higher fee for that appeal process. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said as Mr. Selhorst is appealing to the CDB rather than to the City Manager Designee, he must re-file his application of an appeal under Section 4-501 with the Planning Department indicating he is requesting his case be heard before the CDB instead of the City Manager Designee. She stated she was unsure what date his case would be heard, as there are advertising deadlines associated with all applications. Mr. Selhorst distributed some items he felt the Planning Department is trying to push through to the Commission regarding amendments to the Community Development Code. Ms. Tarapani requested he add a cover letter to the information and submit it to her. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said Mr. Jacobson is permitted to perform those functions, which are permitted by his license. She referred to a license mah0102 elh,bit1 t ,11- 01/24/02 . . issued to Glass America which indicates that auto glass replacement work done off premises, no work done on site, no outdoor storage, office use only. Mr. Selhorst referred to a license issued to him for another purpose. Ms. Tarapani said that license is not at issue at today's hearing. Mark Jacobson, Glass America, asked why he is being limited to certain functions. Ms. Tarapani said Mr. Selhorst has indicated he does not wish to proceed with today's hearing. She said that the property is zoned commercial and Mr. Jacobson is proposing to do vehicle service. The Code does not allow vehicle service as a use in the Commercial zoning district. Mr. Brumback concluded the proceedings at 2:16 p.m. .. . '. mah0102 &.h~bl. 2~ 2-1 Z. 01/24/02 "'-0:. !sf ~$? "{" 110 ~ 7 31 32 ~ o 1104 CI) ii: 105 4 4 "o.:! ~ 1103 1 t 1100 ~ ___ S . 1101 t: 1 / 2 "00 15 if: , 1010 60 16 101< g 1011 26 2f7 38 ; ~ 10 60 ~/' '.0~ ~~ 1'009 25 b~ '.08! to~ ~ ~ 1010~~ ~ 100 ~ I 24 ~I 10061 1'009~,.. 'P '-Ul008k'" ~ 1'007 I I 29 I J- 3~ / lfiJ~ ~ IW . I 237 10047 I- ',007-1 ;,.; 1006Zl ~ 1005 I /,;~~5 / 30 7/ /r/( 35 I -. if ~€ ~ II 22 31 '4 / /.h.... ~ 1(\ 1002 1001 ~ '13; r -.J '::f \t)~ '" 21 17 /32 7 / / .., /", / 6' I ( 1000 I 33 44 1& OJ' CEDAR ST. ~ '.cug 10 1<07 9 1<058 P A 1.:!037 1<01 1.:!08 10 1.:!06 1<0 11 1<04 55 A! 1';;04 ~ I.:!05 "{" 11 12 19 21 ~ ~ <r;j ~ 1';;0, o [lJ 6 '" :;;; ^- <:l 38 37 36 3~ 34 I.:!07 17 18 B U1'F29 23 25 27 5 :(]^- "':;;; 14 13 "0;: 'i!: g D. ~ " & ~;g '" <0 '" fJ p~~", ;lU; ST. &~ '0 20 22 "'28 24 26 5 14 o / /912/ /915 I '" 'fI 1 110/ / /911 1 & 1 0 ~ 2 L 9 908 I/.2 / / 9 /~ D -~?!!J 909 r;;\ / 906 Iff 3 ! O~9~ 1907 ~ / 8 ~ . py vV7 bo~ I 904/~. r 7 9J ry"L~~~}5/4 7 7 tx~ ;~' / 90'i ~ 901 /.( IJJ co ~ ~ 6 900 ~ 5 / g j~f.J /6 <l:l J " It) It) LSON STREET ~ " w ~:;I a>,j50/ It)~ :!1 0/ 1 ~08 f6 j / 1 ~ ~ [ill ~ j j;_~ 41/03 i ~ 8~1 ~; ,83f1 8 / M1/:t 8?7-1 1805 I r_ 7 / ; 7 J!J! % <i I ~ }lIDo "{" id / r 33 . /1205 4 /'203 5 //201 6 L';:, LA SALL /111 7 ~ 1109 8 I -' './ 1206 W N -' 9 Gj+, (f) 8 1204 0 16~ 15 1 o m lr ~ 7 1202 g ~ ;; q) 33 '" '" ell STREET t" '-- 1 3"'? c '> c c <- <- Palmetto St. 905 ~ ~41/01 30 c '> '" liD Ice c MARr.n ~ /Sl.. R/W "'''0_ '08 /~ I ~ I~ ~ 4 3 1-".)' 1 110 ,,'\1:";"1 I 90 / 1,1... ~ f..:.I 9 , I' ~~ J! U8' L l"llVI~ ~ R- L'5', NICHOLSON ST ~11J l14~ ~~ f2 11~ 1~ ~13 .,~ 804 1105 OCJ c[) ;;;- 6 5 '-... 9 ~ J'~. ~ : 12 ~ "" o '" 00 a O::l It) a <l:l t- a '" ~+ &J 55 30 3 6 4 17 7 8 - ~p ALMETTO 00 '" 40 911 12~ ~ 11 2 908 '" ~ ~ co t- o O::l '" a '" 4 3 2 THIS IS NOT A I SURVEY f----- f-.J 25 18 17 23 24_ 907 10 3 ... ~ 2(j ., a a q) to o to <:::> <:::> Ol ..,. o '" w > '" 9 (0 4 '" <:::> Ol <0 <:::> <l:l <:::> Qj 8 5 t- <:::> '" '" a '" ~ 0; W ~ 901 7 ~ :::E~ 6 ITJ 906 909 19 1312 9 8 907 18 ~ 905 17 I......... Yoc !Alleys 9352 294 903 16 14 11 10 90/ 15 <0 q) a <:::> Q) '" NICHOLSON STREET 811 20: ~ I · 809 19: 13 12 9 807 18 I~.ac Ile~~~~ 35'- 294 ~ lr o Z 12 -, 11 I Ie o ~ )~ <0 ,1 2 3 904 902 900 .. ;;; N FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST 0 iii ;. ~ " :s OWNER: Mr. Thomas M. Sehlhorst CASE: APP 02- 01- 01 ~ '" ., I PROPERTY 0 SIZE (ACRES): 0.12 " SITE: 1050 North Myrtle A venue ., .~ ;. '" !l PIN: 09/29/15/25542/005/0001 0 ., 0 i1. ATLAS 2688 " PAGE: " .. :;,! Iii 807 10 ~ NORTH 1"=200' erial Map .Mr. Thomas M Sehlhorst 1050 North kI;TJtle A venue APP 02-01-01 "tl C .. ;;J w ~:....... tV I) - .\ \\.~~ rJ/ ~ .f ~.'I" ~...,.rNfI" CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBIJC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~ I I ...... e View looking southwest . 1050 North Myrtle Avenue Osceola Avenue APP 02-01-01 View looking southeast ------ "" ""'.-------- --,.....-..'" View looking northeast / / / / / 8 / / 6 5 .~~ 3 9 ~f\I :\ 10 ,~ !\,i\i 11 ~~~~ 19 : 1 2 t.;"" I( ~fh'rJ PALM BLUFF STRE~~~ I ~"\J 'I. I ~~I\' ~ 2. ~,\V'1 ~ ..1\11 .. 0;' JURGEN~" ~;...,O' 1 ~ ~ i1l.YJ' ! 1 4:"'1 7 7 ~ 3 4 5 5 t.AFTm STRFFT 5 ~ 3 2 1 3 2 1\ 1 ,~ ~ ..."ff' <+0 7 8 9 r: 10 .~~t~~ PALMETTO ST. ~~ :\ fh". . '\.. "^'~ I\IV" .tV' 1 ,. 'f\F 'nfht:.J 20 ~fh'\11 2 .. ~; 19 63 I 12 11 [) h 20 22 10 9 10 8 b5 26 27 7 ~ 'i{" 12 $ fi (J 6 11 23 25 27 ~ ~V PALM BLUFF 14 ST. if: I^-\ /5 20. ~~ 28 ~ ~ 24 26 1 7 2 ...0; ~ -{ /Y'R' 16 26 ~ 2 . ~( 'At:.J"'~;8 39 25 ~ pl\l ~~ 37 40 / l / 24 / /29 7 1-- _30 / f / -;7 30 7 !-357 ! !ii 22 / 31 7 / 34 / 43 / 1 !5 ~ 21 /7 /32 7 / 33 / 44 / _\ 7 Clj .~":1 CEDAR ST.~f\I:\!f / /1// A>U 1 /10/ I 1 /.0; ~~'f J 2 L ~ J I }1\If!fh1~()'91 ;- ;-7 I / / ~~ I / 7 71f -;-4 7 7 / ! i / 6 I 5 / / /6! w ICH~LSoN STREET I f I I I 9 ~ ~ /10 / / 1 j I 5 1 17 18 ~ i 1 1- - -2-71' 41/03 / NIC~OL~ON I ST ~ ~ 7 F3--=j/S / / t /14 13 12 11 1~ Z u:21!!l 31 32-; ~I ~ 10-' 4- i!: /5 ~/ 5 4 13 ----.... A ~ ... - - I 41/01 MARGO A Vr;----' L . /4 1/3 i 1 II I ~ 4: % Q. 13 .,. o '-. ,.., N 8 8 2 '-. '-. ,.., "., N N 3 4 5 14 3 4 5 6 ,1 /2 "' 10 t- ...J 9 ~ w en 15 8 016 1 0 13 0::: ~ 7 lRE T 2 1 THIS 1$ NOT A I SURVEY ^'\ ~ ~ J~fVJ ~\l ~O 6 3 10 9 8 7 12 .., 11 / / 18 17 23 ~..j 25 24-- 15 1 6 . 5 STRE 6 5 "HTI'1 14 13 12 -- 9 7 1312 9 8 18 17 16 15 14 11 10 NICHOLSON STREET 20: 1 9: 13 1 2 9 :. 0 g EXISTING SURROUNDING USES Iii ~ ;: ~ OWNER: Mr. Thomas M. Sehlhorst CASE: APP 02- 01- 01 -' \!;- .. g SITE: 1050 North Myrtle A venue I PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 0.12 .91 Iii ~ '" PIN: 09/29/15/25542/005/0001 tl Q) 0 if. ATLAS 2688 " PAGE: c .. :#. w ~ NORTH 1" 1320' .cation Map .Mr. Thomas M Sehlhorst 1050 North Myrtle Avenue APP 02-01-01 . <0 .... .;; N N o N ~ ~ 5T '" 'Z o " ?U o ~ d J ~ ~ 1 ~ ~?J~~ ! OECKE1~D ~DI~ i? ,oECKED 5~ MARSHAll 8 51 <( ~ ~~: 51 l~oD ~5D D~D~ 5T :::t CARLTON ~I I~~Q:: ,:;D~D" TANGERINE ST 'i! ~ ~ ~NGMAN 1 5T '3 <t gDDI I~(.' PMM B~UFF S1 ~DSAllE[]]J IS:AlM ~l~u~FD;T I~ ~ JURGENS ST ~ ~ 5 [=::J ~:z tI; is If'I ~o2=J:r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ARG{J croTTO []S1 ~ EryaN STI i -..J SEMINOLE 51 fao / IIII I 0 c:J D "'{' t1 EL.DRIDGE 51 ~~0llD~~ M~E c:=:J CJ '" MAPLE v::: CJ = ~m D~ PLAZA ~EEs/1, . ":EJU!6 ~ y ~,~ '" " 0'0 OlD 0 ~'~ ~ DIDOIDDOO O D ~DDREW D D~Q8jD~b I -;?~ nzD~~8D5n~u'" in ~~ <( :t <(GROVE ~y .owo Sl ~ <( 0 ~ ~~ ~DHEN~ 0 [::=J ~ GROVE ~ z ~ ~ ~ l5<(~~ 0 CrD~D r~~ I D~D~D~ i D~D5D 0 O'jD I CLEVELAND I D~D 51 0 D 8~D> ~ ~ iE 3 ~ PARK 51 <C PARK ST 8 ~ ~ ~ ~Dfi?1I D"D~D 0 ~ c.=:J nz ~ '" PIERCE 51 I <(L-.J <( <( PIERCE u;:: t C> PIERCE ST ~ ~ f?l ~EUNGM;DS1 <( <( ~ :oSAlLE I '" ::) CEDAR ~D Ir~~! ST~ I A LL '" '" " c: '" ." '" ~ '" t5 '" .0 D: " c: '" ,,! Iii 11'"'''''''''' ",~!;EA~~ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA {~~)' PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION \~ ~ ~~/ ~---~!~t;~"'" ENGINEERING . CITY OF . CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW HOUSING DMSION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 January 28, 2002 Mr. Tom Sehlhorst 1005 Amble Lane Clearwater, Florida 33755 \ , '\11 MrH I . ~{/ RE: Case No. APP 02-01-01, 1050 N:~n Dear Mr. Sehlhorst, The above referenced Appeal has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board. The meeting will take place on March 19,2002 at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater. Cc: Garry Brumback Leslie Dougall-Sides S:\Planning Department\C D B\APPE.MJ.~\Std1lh<mtI\IOOO.-N:J~iFI1is~son\Sehlhorst 1050 S. Ft. Harrison CDB Notic&tetM/1I.ocCE M^YOR-COM~lISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER Hon HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER BII.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT A.ND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . j.1 q/ (Jl, ---- II Denial of request for OCL 0008018 renewal with additional onsite work Mr. Selhorse came to the zoning counter on 12/31/01 with an application to renew an occupational license. However, he was not requesting to merely renew the license as it was. Instead, he wanted to add on-site work to a license that was issued under the auspices that no work was do be done on the site associated with the license. This case refers to OCL 0008018 for Glass America, LLC at 1050 N. Myrtle Avenue. Mr. Selhorse has an OCL at 1050 N. Myrtle Ave. for Glass America, LLC for "Contractor: Installation, NOC" with notes that state "Auto glass replacement work done off premises- no work done on site - no outdoor storage - office use only." He wished to add the allowance of service and repair for auto glass at the location. I told him that he could not add on-site work to the current OCL at that location based on the notes in Permit Plan. I suggested that the onsite work was probably not allowed there in the first place because it looked to be a fairly small lot. I said that he should bring in a survey ifthe lot was, in deed, over 10,000 sq. ft. - which is the minimum size requirement for retail sales and service. Vehicle sales and service is 40,000 sq. ft. He argued that the OCL was for repair and service so I should grant him the request. I had some confusion about whether or not auto glass repair is 'vehicle sales and service' or just 'service and repair.' He had some paperwork that showed that the use was classified by the City of Clearwater as 'service and repair' or 'sales and service' or something like that. He also mentioned that he had already gotten a variance for the OCL, so I should grant him this request. There is not record of a variance for this address in Permit Plan. I suggested that he bring me any paper work that shows an approval for this work on that site. Other wise, I could take a look at the property file, but that I didn't know how long it would take to find the variance in the property file. I decided to double-check my interpretation with other members of the zoning and development review team. They all agreed with my decision because the original OCL was issued with the agreement that no work would be done on site; that it would be used for office use only. Other members of the development review team remembered Mr. Selhorse requesting this addition of on site work previously and remember that he was previously advised that it could not occur on that site. Notes in Permit Plan for GCL 0008018: "Auto glass replacement work done off premises- no work done on site - no outdoor storage - office use only/ renewal with on-site work addition denied 12/31/01" "Application denied for allowing onsite work to be added to the GCL license/ the GCL was issued for contractor's office with off-site work onlyl no survey was offered to show that the parcel is large enough to accommodate the onsite auto glass work" (bolded text was in Permit Plan prior to 12/31/01 -- other notes added by me) 1/15/2002 1 :24:49 PM Information Summary for Case #: OCL-0008018 Name: GLASS AMERICA LLC Address: 1050 N MYRTLE AVE Project Description: Auto glass replacement work done off premises- no work done on site - no outdoor storage - office use only/ renewal with on-site work addition denied 12/31/01 Updated: 01-08-02 L_W Project: GLASS AMERICA LLC City: CLEARWATER FL ~e of Owner: COR C~ctor Licensing State Cert. #: Zoning: Comments Land use: PCCLB #: Fict. Name Reg#: State Alc Bev Lic#: Date Opened: 5/30/2001 Category Contractor: Installation, NOC Quantity Home Dcc: D Adult Use: D CUP: D Variance: D Out of City Registration: D Exemption: Notes Auto glass replacement work done off premises- no work done on site - no outdoor storage - office use only . Page 1 of:3 1/15/2002 1 :24:49 PM Activity Description OCLC010 Renewal Notice OCLM 11 0 Parcel Hold Override OCLC100 Issue License - RENEWAL OCLA550 Application Denied . OCLC010 Renewal Notice OCLA505 Issue License - NEW OCLl010 Inspection . OCLB010 Zoning Review OCLA010 Application received OCLB020 Traffic/Engineering Fee Case Start End Type Type Date Date HALF OCL 10/1/1997 12/31/2049 L1CN OCL 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 OCT OCL 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 Page 2 of :3 Information Summary for Case #: OCL-0008018 Activity Hold Updated Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Disp. Level By Updated Notes 7/25/2001 No Hold B_J 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH 1/15/2002 BLS 1/15/2002 Condition Code: HOLD Value: Description:Hold w/overide 1/15/2002 DONE No Hold BLS 1/15/2002 01-02 12/31/2001 DONE Hold A_D 12/31/2001 application denied for allowing onsite work to be added to the OCL license/ the OCL was issued for contractor's office with off-site work only/ no survey was offered to show that the parcel is large enough to accomodate the onsite auto glass work 10/19/2001 10/19/2001 DONE No Hold WBS 10/19/2001 Duplicate renewal notice faxed to Roy 813-558-8507, stated by phone that this location is open 5/30/2001 DONE No Hold WBS 5/30/2001 00/01 1/2 year fee 5/25/2001 5/30/2001 5/30/2001 DONE No Hold WBS 5/30/2001 SITE INSPECTION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCL PER DEE REQUEST, # 813-927-1893 CELL NO. FOR MARK / SALE REP. PLEASE CALL PRIOR TO INSPECTION FOR ENTRY TO BUILDING. 5/30/01, office set up with phone and fax machine, one rack of wind shields in storage area of unit. Mark stated there would be no wind shields installed at this location, service men would pick up orders and windshields here for installation where the vehicle was located. Also Mark stated he was the only business occupying this unit. He was informed if he should lease a portion of this unit, approval from zoning and separate OCL is required. ds 5/25/2001 Warning A_D 12/31/2001 5/25/2001 No Hold AKR 5/25/2001 5/25/2001 DONE Warning WBS 5/30/2001 Fees Trans. Revenue Create Created Case No. Dept. Description Code Account No. Date By Amt. Due OCL-0008018 HALF YEAR LICENSE 010-321101 5/25/2001 AKR $30.25 OCL-0008018 LICENSE FEE - 010-321101 12/31/2001 K_B $60.50 RENEWAL OCL-0008018 OCTOBER DELINQUENT 010-321101 12/31/2001 K_B $6.05 10% 1/15/2002 1 :24:49 PM Information Summary for Case #: OCL-0008018 Fee Type NOV Case Start End Type Date Date OCL 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 Case No. Dept. Description OCL-0008018 NOVEMBER DELINQUENT 5% OCL-0008018 DECEMBER DELINQUENT 5% Fees Trans. Code Revenue Create Created Account No. Date By 010-321101 12/31/2001 K_B 010-321101 1/15/2002 BLS Amt. Due $3.03 DEC GCL 1/1/1990 12/31/2049 $3.02 Notes No es site inspection prior to issuance of ael 12/31/01 - APPLICANT WISHING TO DO REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT WORK ON PREMISES - NEED ZONING APPROVAL Attached Parcel(s) Parcel No. 09-29-15-25542-005-0001 Section Township Range Subdivsion 09 29 15 ELDRIDGE, J. J. People Listing Block Lot 005 005 Role First Company Type Last Name M.1. Name Address 1 Address 2 City State Zip Phone 1 Ext.1 Phone 2 Ext.2 Name Hold Primary BUS GLASS AMERICA LLC 14513 N NEBRASKA TAMPA FL 33613 727-447-1501 GLASS AMERICA Y AVE Lyle Hill, Pres.of mth indo owner of glass america. Corp # MOOOOOOOOOB3 OWN SEHLHORST THOMAS 611 PALM BLUFF ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 No Hold N . Page 3 of 1 , . . NDr~ ~r-eenu)oaJ Assoc.\Q.4-10V\ . I V\c. J :r C>c'O...~~ wa..de... 'P. o. ~o)(. ~o5 C\fuY-LU:.\-.-\-er) ~L 33i55 Ho..v-bor S\()~S u:h.-\e,4'r-on.t- Gndo 4ert\1..CU\S+r'~ewsLI 500 N, Osce6lCL ~J-e, #-/05 QJ e().. v- (9,.u.A..e ~ J \=L 337.s-S- Dr::lF<L.(~IGE" E::THEL PO UF~(.)I/JEF!. l09S DI.)j.....!E[) I H FL. :.':~; .:::1.6, '~;I ~/ .1 () ,:) ~::'!; AP P 02. -0 (- 0 I CbB 3 -fer -02- I 5] ( D J 1 F) ~IJOLF::F" E3Ej.'.IJ fii"""j I N 6~, 'y' (.) I r;~ sr p{:)j"iPl T ."c;(.)N I sr;~(.)EL . . N FRENCH. ,JOl-m f.j Ff~E~'.!CH" SnNDRn L 1:500 i.'1r-:iI~...! ST DI.JNEDIN F'L. 34-("l18 -(P'13~ ClEnRwnTER. CITY OF PO [;;OX ,~..' "'y :3 ~3 7 .~:::.1:3 i+ '7 it. ~3 EVERVBODV'S TABERNACLE INC 1120 1'1 BETTV L.f....! CLE:(~:;~W(~ITCR FL ClEARWATCR. CITY OF PO eox ,'" u :~5 :5 ~l !S ::) ::; :5 () :3 F'L. CLEnRIt')i~l.rCG~" C I' '\.' PO [:0)( 4'/., CLEf--. . r~ TE:F~ BURGE:SS" WILLIE P f.3UF<~GESS" \lERf'jICE 1004 N GARDEN AVC eLE(~if~I^,{:lTER FL 337S.s- -362(.,. SEYMOUR. JAMES E SR ::i;E:Vf.'iOtJr~~. PE(iRL I E: 807 N JE:FFERSON nVE (": I i~:";. I.~' r:;'1,16T F:: F~ F. L. '337S""S - 4-318 WVATT-ClARK. MARIE 1000 N cnRDEN AVE: CL.E~~RIt,)A TEF~ F.t :3::)7.551 MC LEOD" RODRIGUES 44.:~, E: L(~K.E DR TARPON SPRINGS FL AIR DISTRIBUTORS TNC 1159 ELDRIDGE Sf CLEr-'1RI,I)A TER F'L 3 ..4 I~~ f~ f:J f31~:~ :2 '7 2:) ::s '/ E~, E;, 4. ?; .1. () I['~C 1....) I L.L.1 (1 f.1 S . E:F~ I C D 1288 BAV HARBOR DR ~ 105 P(iL.f.'.j HAF<~CO~~ F'L ,~3 ..<l () ~:~ .~::I :3 4. () J.. GF~I~i'Y'. F<O[;EI~T L. G f'((i V " S U Z Pi t...j [...j E: K 2.101 L.r'1GOON DR [)I..Jt....!ED I 1'1 FL. 64098" T 13 C I......' If,jC: 630 US HWV 1 STC 500 NORTH PALM CEACH FL 3:~)408 4610 .~~~: /i .t~. (:) (~:. SVK.E::3" f'i(;~R\( It.) 481 HIBISCUS eIR S l)tJNE:D I i....j F~L D c.~ I }~ ~~~; :::;~1-(>'9~3 .:131.1 E3LI.Jf....!T" OPHEL I n 1451 DREW ST ~ 4 CL.E(.~RW(~Tr::::Fi: F'L ::~) ::5 '7 ~~I E. !::I:? 1.1. DUF~TON. [31~PPY E 1006 PAIL.POAD AVE CL.Ei~F~I,I)()TE:R FL :3:57' !::I ~S SEHLHor~ST" THDi'1(lS ivi / 611 pnL.M DL.UFF ST C:LE(iF?I.....I(iTEH FL. ::5 ::5 '7 .~~I :.:; ~5 () .S 1.-1. () T 1<, I i.'.j ~3" ,'.j r-'1 E :<. 1005 RAILROAD nVE CLEAF~W(~ITE:R F'L. ::; ::S "7 !~;. ES i."j . . HUDSON, JAMES W JR F:JO [30}< 205~)4 T{~1'1Pt~ r--L SADLON PROPERTIES INC 217 N MISSOURI AVE CU:(:~RI^,ATER FL_ :!.; ~3 {~;; ':l ~2 ::;;3755 4618 -.. lBEf~N()CLE I j'.J.C MC KINNEY, HENRY 1 1213 N GARDEN AVE CLE{.lM:'^,ATER FL. ~~;::3 7" E~,5 :2c:::lI.S3 PORTER, I,~AYNE J PORTER, Pih()rJ.D() J 60::5 [:':NGr.1{~~'~ ST CL.f::,':)RI,....I(,':)TEr;;: [:L. "::?~ ~::~; ~'l !::::, r~;, ''';0 /i. () ~Q ":Z; '~~ ~'l h~, t.\ ---:> ..~1 (", s::.~ 13 L U ~...!r" J 0 f'.l i'..! I E COll'!I~~RT, BOBf:1Y 61:)4 r....! .JEFFEF~SOr..J. C::LE(~)Rhl{iTEF;:: FL PAG{:)NC)" SI~H JR 1200 N hYRTLE AVE Cl_E:AF~I,~,':)TEr,~ F'L ."':;'::;:;.71:::;."". .6.'.{'1.::1; :33~!.~S5 3.1~~:~S SWINTON. VERNITA H C/O SWINTON. JOHN L lE;,46 GEHTF?Y ST C;L.E{~M:V,!()TEF<: FL. CHARRIN, CHRISTIAH JR .132 I SLr::)ND VJP,Y CI~E:()F?I^"iTER FL. ~<:;?~7r.;!::::1 ~~r.::1'17' :::; ~? "/ I,:~ ~? ~2 ;~ ], () WHITING. EVELYN E 709 i."I{-)RGC) {~VE: C;LE:{~Rli'!I~TEH [:L. PONDS, BRENDA L 1'1 70:':, IviP,F?GO t~'v'E :5 :3 ~l.~S .~S :::; ~:~ (::; .~) CL.Et~RI,~(~) TER FL. 3;-) 7" ::,.:;. ~5~3:?).5 CLEVELAND, CATHERIHE L .701 r./i{~PGO P,\iE CL.E,~'iF~V,J{:~TEP FL i'1C COV'" ril~1r.1 I I~N [: 700 NICHC)L:S:~;ON S1 CLE(~P'i,J{:lTEH [:L. 3 :~;; ~l ,:; ~:' :3 f~ 3 .5 :.:; ~5 ~l.5 ::' :'5 ~_~~ :::; () STEPHENS, EDDIE A STEPHENS. SHEILA D 704 r'~ I CH()L.SON :31 CLE()h~l,h!,iTER [:1.. B(HTLE:, L I SPi (.l 70S t.,.! I CHOL.SOt,.~ 3T CLE::I~,:)RI,~A TEF? FL. ~::r.; '':'?; '~l ;::::, !~":;, :-:z. :~::;: ":t; ,...~, ::3 :3 7" ,~s .5 ;3 ~:3 ~3 t~ t'1(4r;;:3HI~:lL.L" [) I nNE 71.::-::': b!IC;HOL.30r..J, 3T eLC{)RVII('iTEh~ Fl.~ Me DANIEL. BHIDGET R 60::5 s eCD(4R 3T :3:3 "7 E;, ~s :5 ~:~:3 6. eL.EI::)Rli,!t~TER FL, ~5 ~s )" ,S .::, ~3 () .1 () VPII_L I t':F?[:S" i"i{)RC: BARTELL, HOBEHT H 214 S HIGHLAND AVE C.J i~::' ,,\ <:;'1,,1/', T' C. t) C" / 3 "'I ,,,~.,,,,L,,' ."(',, [.,.f.. r "-' 337~ ~ ~ D(~) V I S, (~LL IE h(~E 91~L N Ci(iPDEN (..'lVE CL.E(~RV'!(iTEH FL. 3::')7',~~,.S 3()~Z!S SHIGHT, WILLIAM E BRIGHT" PAHTHENIA A '::;0 0 <) t....! G () H D E r...J, (:;~ V E C: L. E. {:l H VII () T E r:::: F L. 33 7S::S: - 3o;;1.S' S~1,~~r?T. Cr:~L V I N ~;;t....i(')RT" JIJ{>,N I TA 907 r,.! CI~~F<DEN (-lVE CL.[:,::'jH!,',.I(~Tf::h~ FL 337~S-3DJ5 '":~: ~:I.:: '7 r'; ~:::. "':< ('~ .~) i::-~. r.'! 0 U F;: (~" (~1.....!1 H (:I N V () 905 t....! c; (.) f;~ D E ~...! () \i E C L. E () F?ll,,1 (-11 E: R 1::- L,. '3 ::s '7 .S .~=:' :3 () :~ .5 LEE" ELLf.l D EST C,/O LEE. r....iINr~IE 600 NICHOLSON ~:;T c::: L E:: () F< 1,....1 (-)T E F<: FL. ~:;;:, --::r. -'l S 1::. ':<::.("1'"::;: /i . . NELSON, LILLIE R WILSON, SARMELLA 604 N I CHOU;;ON ST ('1 r........ nl.'/' .'T'r.:"q F'L 37 ~ .,.(::Hr<.fYl'"l LC:r". '. '3 S~- 303 ..:t: '.Z -'l )::~. t~. "/.:: 1''''1 "x /i MC Ci I L.L. V I OLE:NE: D(')H I EL, DEI"iEh'R I S 1109 1/2 CiRANT ST CLE(:\RI/.,I(~ T[F<~ FL 3.3 7S-S- ..:~. ,":,~:' "';'" r:: t::: STONEHOUSE, JOHN L 606 HICHOLSON ST CLE:AF<I....JI0iT[h~ FL CRUDE:h', LOh'E:TTA Y 904 BLANCHE: B LITTLEJOHN T CL.EI~RI/\I(:\ TER F.L. :':;:5755 :3851 3 :3; -/ ,~?!S :~; () 3 4 MOORE. CASSANDRA TRE FORD FAMILY TRUST 305 N MARTIN L KINCi AVE 1;~;~;~f;'(^J~:~;;~~ F'L. 337,ss - '+LfoCa BLUHT. JACQUELINE 1001 N MARTIN L KINCi AVE ~14 CLEARI,,',JATER f::"l_ 32; '7 !.~l .S :3:3 ::2 ~3 H(\F-I.N, F.I,OFll::r;~T B 1254 FRANKLIN ST CL_E:(:\f~I/,J(iTE:F-I. FL. CLAYTON, h'OBE:RT F PO !30X~::,21:5 L?~RDO F'L :5::5"7 :::'(, 58.14 :33 "? "ll~~) .::-' ~~.1 :3 HUELSTER. JAMES F :3766 BE:NSON AVE N ST pE:Tr:::RSBURG FL CARILLON CARPET & RUGS 1107 N FORT HARRISON AVE: CLE(~h~I;,J(~TER f:'L_ :3~5"l.1:5 34!.:.:.}3 :3 ?; 7 .~::f .5 ~3 () :d: J.. EVl:: INC C(.\R ! 110. cu:: ::33 "7E.. .~~l :::; () ~? .1 SNYDER, JOHH H IV 502 PALM BLUFF ST CLEAR~\JA TER F'L. :5:3 "l.!5 !.S ::;; () .5.1 E.AST" KEF<RY 400 ISLAND WAY ~ 1011 CU::tiR\I.JATEF< FL :337(;,.l C(~R I N(), FWBERT F' 1816 ORANGE HILL DR E3 R (l I'~ D 0 i....J, F I~ :5:5':5 J... () :2 ~S ::3 .5 CYHI~~I".~ I Ul<, E:\il~r~ CYH(~I...,! I 1.)1<' '0 (~t"--.!GEL,(\ 7546 PINE LANDS DR I."'E:SLE"{ C:I'I(~PEL I""L ~~:; >t; j:'~:l d. .(1 t:::1 ~l") "1 SI[TSM(~" Dr-WID S 1.146 DF.I,E\,J :3T CLEAF.I,I;.J(.)TE:R F'L. :3 ~3 "7 E;!) 4 ~3 .11):' CLAF?I{ ,. (:"lL. V I I',.! CL,Af~~I<'" PE:C;GY 1206 N GARDEN AVE CLEPIr<:I/,)f-':'ITER FL. :~ ....~)' ~:; C::;f ") ~::1 ,-? f~ SNYDER, JOHN H IV 502 PALM BLUFF ST CLEARI....JA TEF.: FL GROVES. WILLIAM M LIMPERIS, KAREN G 120:3 L.DVJEL.L OF.: HUI...!TSV I L.LE ~~L_ :3:375.5 ::;;051 :~; .k:, f~ () '1 '? l~ () ;;:::~ POI/.,IEL.L., F\ I CH(~RD 506 PALM BLUFF ST CLE()F<INI~~TER r=I_ CiROVES, WILLIAM M 120:3 LOWELL DR SE HUr'J.TSV I LLE tiL :'53lE:;.5 :';;051 :3580.1 2608 I~JEI'jZI~\DEi".J,E" DAV J D PENZABE:NE:. JULIE 2280 DOI/J Cb! S?~F""ETY H{-)F<~BOF;~ I""L. CITY HOUSING ASSIST CORP 17::?7 ()TH 3T t....! :3T PE:TEF~SBUHU F:L. 337"()4 ~l:?CI5 . . o::::~ ,~,,' DLJNE GU'y'!, ()LE3E:~~:T L. eH)Y!, l_ I1'.!D{i t1 1,(:,89 OAf< PL C::LE()RI/\I(~TER Fl_ St1ITH, ~'iARV I,v SMITH-PE:RNELL, MARIA n 1500 N MADISON AVE C:LE{iR\iJI~TER FL >~: ~~r. ~''l i::::, r;:. ~I :-z~ l::::. "~I ..:<:; ~::?:"'? t:., 1:;, ~~:. tC.., "7"< ~)' GO 01/.,1 Ii'..!" (..)RfHON ll~'; 91.1 I...! (....i\'RTLE fiVE:' CI_E(~F~liJATER FL H[~F<IE!, j;~()Y("iOND J. 1201 N GARDEN AVE CLEAF~liJA TEI~ FL ::;; :3 '~l.S ::;1 ~1 :2 :2 :2 :3 2:; Ir .::=. .5 :2 ~4 ~( ~1 INC COBB, IAII '-_BE::::!T COEm, '-_AURA 120~5 t.,! GARDEN CLE:I~R(.I)I~TEf~ FL (lVE: ~:;.:: ..:::~: ~~( r.:: c: ,-'> ./i ~:. ~'l 337S:S - JlfJ.-7 C::H(~F;:L_E~:) ,. FF~I~NK I E 603 PALM BLUFF ST CL[:r:l~~W(~TER F'L 3~515~S ~305(:j ~'j ~~)T' CI-j()F<LES: ,T I r10THY CH{)r~~LES" TOR I 1819 Ol/.)EN DR C::L,EARVlI(~TEr-x FL '3 "37S"Cj - 17 ').,3 ~;( ':;( '7 r:: CI "I ..~., .~) '~~:' Hlr~E, DC)UGI_()S c:: 604 PALM BLUFF ST CLE()R\i.)(.) TEF\~ F-'L ?:; ~5 ~l .5 .~) :3 () 5 ?5 (..j r1 ST CU:: INC ST Si'.'j?-)L,L." EI~(1A L_ r.:;02 JUF<GENS ST CL[~ARI/MTEf~ FI_ 3375.5 3109 COCKERHAM. DANIEL W 2699 SEVILLE BLVD # 503 CI_E:()F<I,iJr:1TER FL, JONE:~~:" 1'.jENPY 798 .]UF~GEI'.!S ST CLE()RWATCR F'L. :~:S 3 7' 1:;.4 1.1 ~4 ~3 337.55 3107 CHURCH OF GOD BY FAITH 1007 N MVRTLE AVE CL_E{)h~I/.)ATEF< F'L BY j::eAITH l:i \l E ~:S:3 "7 !::I 5 ::.::; .1 ~~~:3 :53'75;) 31.L~:3 CHUPCf- .1001 CL..E:(~R JONES" ELIJAH P JR 1424 f3~~I=<[3~~R{i (~\iE CLe(~p(~,1(~ TeR Fl_ 3~3}SS 2'70.1 :3 ;~; ~{ .5 :::1 WILLIAMS" ALVIS FEST Cia WILLIAMS. HENRIETTA L 816 .]tJF~GEi.>.jS ST C: L. E {l F<~ (,.,1 (-~ T E f-x f2. L 337~~- 3iO, S(1 r TH" ~(?-)THL_ETN MERTHIE" WILLIE M 81,0 JURGENS ST CLEAR(.I)(YTER FL. -;;: --::t, .~~/ t-::. r:., .':~ '1 () (:;) ..:~( --::::: 7 1:''::, r.::, -:;;:; 1 ("I (~, . BAILEY. GLORIA E 81(~ .JURGEHS ST C:LE~;\RV.!~)TER r:'L :5:375::; 51(),) THALER. JEFFREY G TH(lcLER. ZEt.,.! I TH 1808 SHERWOOD CIR CLE~ir~IIJ(lcTER FL '-:;;:' ~::t '~?' .1.: ....~ L..A -1 .,.~:, 337" \.f-- ~ c.fl ~ G ""Z--::-('7..~_/i LA1....) HILL. MARY BEST 82!) JURCiEHS ST CLE(-)RI/,!{)TE~R FL :35755 :"51.10 H(~~NC()Cf<. t./jAR'y' t...J, 152 P~~L,t1E:TTO F~D CL"E(CjRI,h!ATER F'L_ ;s 3 ~l.~) I~) ALPHA & OMEGA IHC 18514 US HIGHWAY 19 N ~ D-2 CLE~~F~VJATEF~ FL :5 :?;; ~l6, ~4 :? "7 () i1. TALIAFERRO. G PATRICIA GRIFFIH, HARDY JR TRE 2::', 5 .~l U t...J, I 0 i.....! S T S ;:;;T PETEr-<SBUF,~G F:L ?~; :-::~; '7 '1 ,') ~ l-::;. ~~I ~? WILLIAMS. BEHEDICT WILLIAMS. JULIET 1564 GEi.,.J,TI7.Y ST CL.E(.;r~~\I~~TEF<: FL. ?~ 7; ~l t:; t:::1 ?=; t::;j ,,~;:. CJ F-?UTLEDGE. L.O ~) .11.17 I_(,)S(:)LLE ST CLEf~\RI/'!(lTEF,~ FL :3 ::::) ~I .S .::. RUTLEDGE. SPENCER r 805 LAS{-)LLE ST CLE:('jl~"'JATER F'L :-S :::; 7' 5:~1 ~5 RUTLEDGE, CH(.)RLES C JR RUTLEDGE, GEL EATER 8t)5 L.~~S(~LLE ST CL.EAr,<:ll.,I()TEF~ FI" ?:;X:f!:\/:"':; STE:PHEt...J,S" .JESSE: F)() E3()){ 1~?~2:3 CLEM-<I/>!(-')TER FL :5~3~?S'? .1~2:23 . or:' B".,.' F(')ITI-i c ~~VF ..:;;~ "-;<" -'7" .~:: /i ..( .....i -1 ....) Me KINNEY, HENRY T 121.:::; Gr-')r;~D[H ()VF CLr!-I~,)F~I,\J~~TER FL :5:3~? .S .5 ?;:-;:::;"l r~I!::~' "I ~ ,r.:; '1 :3H:r TH. ~'jt\R\'" V 10()5 Vlt.-,/E r-~VE i...J, CLEARI,"'!('ITEf~ Fe I.. :5 :~:S 'l.:::::, ~s ~~:; 1.:;, ~~; TILL^i'.'j'::",)N ,< ROXIF: 811 L~~SPll_L.E ST CU::{)RV.JA TFP FL. 3 :~3 ~l .S .~~I BARBER. BARBARA H 11,<].7 Ei....!Cr.1AH :3T CL_Er;>,f~~IIJI~~Ten FL _1~1i;;'" :::; ::3 '7 .::1 .::1 ::3 2 ::2 () nUTLEDGE. CHARLes C JR 80:::;; L~~)SP:L,L_E ST CLEt\RVJ(')TEF<~ FL. ... :3 ~5 ~f .5 ,:::, ."" SJ1 I TH" c"jr-')RV 1,1.,1 SHITH-PERNEL.L.. M(')RIA D 1500 N HADISOH AVE CLE:{~F~\I.JI()TEF~ FeL. ":;'(, :~: --;''' t;, t~ ") l~.. ?:; ~7 STnRf<.F:r~, HODEF~T ST(~nf<.Ef~, h~iF<:Y 1107 BLANCHE B L.ITTLEJOHN CLE(.)RW(lc TER F:;L ",':1,,\:,,4 . . SHACKELFORD, JAMES 1137 LASALLE ST CL,E:(~F(I/J('ITEF< FL. JONES, ELIJAH P JR 14~24 B()RBAr~r:-) (~VE CU~ARI,h)ATEF~ FL. :5~57:)5 2701 ::33)' ,S.S TURt...J,Ef::(" I/"IILLIE .J 706 PALM BLUFF ST C:LI::()F<I/.)(iTf:P F'L CLEARWATER, CI Y OF 112 S OS~_. A AVE PO B..: "':1'/48 C:LL(~F.;~~~(~TER FL ?) :~~; ~l~:1 .5 31. ::) .1 .~: ~t"'J r.::,:::::? /i ~7 .....i ~::~ C:OOPEF~, LUCILLE 703 PALM BLUFF ST CLE()F<I;,)A'rE::r~ FL CLEARWATER, CITY OF 112 S OS~~: A AVE PO F'" 4'/48 C,,, :M~I,h){~ TEF~ F'L ?):3"?~3~S 31:~S~2 "::1:: '"::r ..--;, ~::: (:).1 "'"'l ...~ <:.';< COOPEP" PAUL 705 PALM BLUFF ST CLE(-lf::(I,h)I"iTEF,: F'L BPIDGES, BERTHA EST C./O CALE, ~1{~Fn E 801 PALM BLUFF ST ~~~;~~\I')~~~::~: FL, 337SS - 313 'f ::s ~5 "7 .5!S :::; J.. :3 ~2 CH(~r?L,ES" T I i10TH'y' CHAr~LES, TOF? I 1:31.9 Olr.IEt....!S DR ~~:~:;~;~~;~~~):~::~ FL, 337SQ -/723 ROWELLS, CATHEPINE P 807 PALM BLUFF ST CLE (:lr~I,h)A TER r=L. :3;3"751.5 3.134 M~ DEMPS, BEATPICE EST 9()7 Vlh!E ()VE CL l::::() RI,h)('1 TER F'L ::5 3 ~/ 5. ..S .4 :2 ..:;. ~? R\'AN" 1;,) I LL.,I()j"'j P 1,029 l:::L"t"j ST S()t....! C()RL,OS C::A 94070 382:5 HUGHES, ROBERT E SR TPE 808 TF?UST 2"'1-99 181:-) CARL TON DR C'_EnR~\I()TEP FL. 337..s-Q - /70<.0 .'% '% '7 ,c.:. (",1 .'1"7' () .'~. KINGSBUPY, DnNIEL F TRE 21.1 ()TH (~VE Sir) LAF<~GO FL CHAPLES" TOFU CHnRLES, TIMOTHY 1.819 o \".,1 E t"! [)F< CLE(>{R\""I(~rEr? FL 33,.rQ - /7 Z3 '')'''-;( ....;.- r:; CI "j "''-l ~':'l. "z 3 ~5 }" "? () ::> ..:. :51. C) LI T L, F: ",,"', L E \,/ :1 802 PALM BLUFF ST C L, C l"i Pi,I) (>1 T F= r-~ i:' L. CLIFTON. CHnRLES H EST C/O EVnNS, CnSTELLn E PR 1214 FnIPBURN AVE Cu::nF,l\.I,i(_) TEn FL 3 3 7~S: - 3320 7?7~~ 7~0n _~ ::) ~3 '7 .S .S ?i; .1. :::S:3 MT CARMEL BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLCARWATEP INC 1012 PENNSYLVANIA AVE C;L[()F<~I/.)r:~rEF~ FL 337S-S- CAPSWELL, PAULINE N 9():.3 L,(-~S(;iLLE ~3T CL.E:::ARI,'\!(l TER F'L. .::::;~;::: ".T !:~, r:., ~5 :5 ~l ~:~j .~) CHlJF~CI-j 13ROlr)N, J.(lt1ES GROI....)N" t....1ICOLE S 905-907 LASnLLE ST C;LE()F~I;\lnTER FL (;WE --:~-:;~':::;'7 J::;;. r.::. ---z; '1 _'":t:f.~) ~~""''I't:::,t:::, () \/ E: CH~(lY" FWBERT L, GR()Y" SUZ{~NNE l{ 2101 U~GOot'-! DF~ DUi'.J,EDIN PL L. . ~::::: ....1 .o:~:.. (.";) !~~~ LOG~lf"-..'" EI'ji.....i(~ T f3L.DG ?:Z nPT 4 1.001 1'-,/ h(~HT I i....J, CLE:{)P(I')('j TEr:;~ F'L. EST LCJ'rHEH I<.Ii".J.Ci ~l\/ ":{ '"'Z ~l !:.-=:. r:~ 337Sr i.....iOODV." III)II_.L.IE hOODY" L(~il)F.~A (;~ "1209 BLI:ii''-J,CHE: f3 C LEA F.~ 1,1.,1 (~l T r:: F? f::: L L. I TTL.EJOHI....! 33'55 - 3(5() '?:; "':'<; ~:! r..::, ~::;. ~,~~:"1 r.~. ("J T(~IYL,OH" RC)E~E:F?T L 1::;613 120TH ST L.(lF-1CiO F.L hAXIE" EVEHS L JH 826 WOODLAWN ST ~ 102 Cl_E:()R'tJI--,)TE:f~ FL ::s ~3 ~l"l ~3 .1 () 1. (. 3:3~1.S6, JONES" ELIJAH P JP 1424 BARBARA AVE: CLE:~lF-1~'.)(.~ TEP F;.L RUTLEDGE" TALhADCiE A TRE 1105 L(i ::::~;ALL.E ST C:LE{)RI,I.)()TE:R FL :337S~) 2"701 3:3;:'-f.5!S 3:2'34 TILU1M..!" FWXIE 1204 ROOSEVELT AVE CLE{)RI,i.)()rTER FL. ,JC)HH~;:ON" LEROY 1206 ROOSEVELT AVE CLEI:iR't"IATCr;~ FL ~5 ::5 '7 -5 ~3 :3 .1.:5. :5 ?) ::S }' ~:':I.S ~3.1 !.:) 3 TERRCLL" LEHORA M 217 E3 I RCH r:;~D CL_()RCSV I L,L,E Ti....J, CLEARWATER" CTY OF P 0 f30:::< ,..w.. c.~' CLE(:~ .j rER FL. 3?042 57<-18 EV(~ji....J,:::;" 13E:TTY .J 91:2: .JUf-<GENS 8T C:LE{)F.:I,I,)()TL':F-? FL LEE" HETTV J 910 ..]U~<CiEr~S ST CLIE~lRI,i.)(:j TER FL ~3 :,3 ~l.~) .S 3 .11.. ~l 33755 3112: HUEVJITT" ELL.IS Bf~O'tJN " N I COLE S 903 PALM HLUFF ST CLE{)RV,){)TE:.F-1 Fl., BR"lil~ll...J,T" CHERYL r'i 1259 NICHOLSON ST CL.E~~RI,i.){)lER F'L :::t; :-:<. '7 t; !::., ?; ~) ?; f~ ::'S 3 '., 5 .5 ti,. ~:I :2 C:, SAMUEL" CYNTHIA A 913 JCJPGEr....!:3 Sf CLE~~RII\)(:i TEP F'L DrWIS" AL'rHE:.(~ 907 ~JUF-1GENS ST C L. E: I;~l P 1,1.) i'~T E:': R FL. :3 :3; ~1 5 ~S :.; .11.. :3 :.:S :::; ~7 .~::I !S zs 1~ .1 :3 '...../()RREt'!" ..JOSrEPH ItJ(:'iF?h~EN" CYNTHI(11 :;'08 I....! BL"UF.F ST HEPf-<IEN SPPGS 1"iI /i>:::;'.'j (,">:; 1 nr,',?" 4-'1ID3-1C67 TP:YL.,OFi" FiUTHIC J(~r'iE:3" L I L.L I E: h aO? V I i..'J.E: (lV[' CLE:.(iF~(^,1PITE:~R FL .~;:: '?:: -7 l:.~:. r:;;. /'1 ",:> r-..:. ,....~ PF~ I r"J.CE" LLOYD (:l PFiINC~E" BCSSIE 1'1 912 Pi')LI'1ETTO ST CLEli~RI,IJ{)T[R FL, 3 3,S-S - ~9 A ~~ "Z '7 j:~~ C~..'1 .....::0 "";~ (:) -1:," -z "7 1:':=: i:~ /; ,e,) ,"'::' c. CLEAPWATEP NEICiHBORHOOD HOUSINCi SEPVICE:S INC 608 j'-.J, Gi')RDE:N i')\/E CLE()F-1hl()T[F? FL HILL" PUPEPT J SR 1131 1/2 CiPANT ST CLEi')R'....)ATEP F'L_ 33.7~3:.5 :26t:2~J . . ST JOHN PRIMITIVE E3APT I Sf (:::HUF~CH 10()2 p(...'iLr.'lETTO ST CL.E{iF<~\,',.IfiT[':F-< F'1. 3375"""S .~(. .~;"( '7 1:.':: r.:~ CLEARWATER ~ITY OF PO r30>< ,~., <.: S CLE~>' fiTEF7. r:::-I.. CLEARWATER. ~ITY OF 112 S OSC__LA AVE PO E3O"' <1l48 CLE' ";~\h.l(;::\TEF< FL .-::~. "7' '~7 t:: K.:: "'7 (:) ..'") .of.. l,\.I~iF<NEF<~. JANE F 1,t.)(~F<t"'ER" ROE3EWr D 129 E ALTADENA DR PIL T ()OEl',.J,() C() Cf/OO/-'3J6<f CAMPBELL. WILLIAM C TRE CAMPBELL. GLORIA D TRE lOll WEATHERSFIELO DR DUNEDIN FL 34(,q~-~~3'1 ...z ....i L Cl {~;. ~~~...1 ~z A {,:, "1 ......, I'~"I '1 !:::.: 1 ...~~ /i .rUC:<'EF;~" GEORGE: TUCf-(ER" OEF<ETHI'i 4981 BEN E30STICK DR NELSON, DORSESENA 0 90::'5 VINE (i\iE C:LEARvJA TF::r:;~ F'L. Qt..! I NC'y' FL_ 32-351-5/3~ ?S ~5 ~? ~5.5 t1- :~~ .5 :2 '':'2' ....~. "::1" i:: '1 t::: '1 ~Z .'-~ Df'iv..IS0N. ~'j(\RY Eo; f<.Ei"'iP" J{>ff.~iES () 905 V IHE ~iVE CL.E{.)RWr;iTF:C.R F'L NE:L.:30H. COLD I E 907 VIr.J,E: I~VE CLEAF?I.....I(...'iTER FL .~: "Z ~] c: i:::;. ...'1 ..') r..: ...:;. 33755 - If.36 ~ ~3 3}' ~:" .5 I~. ~? S':? BOi.',J,Cf<.. 'rnSHA (.) CHERRYHOMES. ARHOLD JR ~52CI l'if;: 1 S ~~\VE t....l E T f>: I R 1 E L f'i 7a::x:::lS ''':','' ("II"~'II""'1 t: I,h.l I LL I (...'ir'1S" li..IAYf~E 1{<Ll 3UHSET DR CL.E(~)RI.....I(\TER F'L 2.)37 !:;l!') ~.2t.:l'~?:19 1,I,.IIL.LI:~'if1S. v.)(...'iYNE .1611. I. :".. T CLE{.) GODWIN. ARTHONIA T ()11 f'..J, f.1YF-<TLE (.)\iE C:I..Ef'iRI,,',.I(iTER r::::-L :3::37 !S.~) 4:2~?::.c~ FULLER. EDDA M E3 908 \i:r: t.'!E fiVE::: CLE()Fo?l,\.II~~TEf-7. r:::-I.. HAMILTON. JUAHITA 906 VINE AVE CI.-[{)F?'v..It'iTER I::::L ::~; :~:;~? ~s .:s ~1. ~;~ .S ,1 :3:3 ~l.:~1!.5 <12: .S .1 1,h)()LDEN" .]()f.1ES I....) "....,(~L.D[:::N " LELf'i t.1 9()4 V I NE ()\/E CL.EAf-"I/J()TEFo? FL ~',,1H I TE. t"l{>lRY L 902 \i I HE riVE CLE()RI/.)riTER FL ?~ ~::e:; 7' t:~l 1.':::. <j ...;,:- r:.. '1 ?; ZS ~l E.) !S (~f 2 :':1 1 C~()RR" RIJ.TI'{ r3 ':;:000 VINE AVE CLEARI,I,)(:':jTER FL. CI'iP3Hf'iV.). (...'ir...!N i"'i 2180 CYPRESS POIHT DR N CLE(lFo?l/J()TER r':L. ::5~; 7' E~;1.5 <'~. :2 .51 :5:5-76.2) Df? t....! GODWIN. ARTHONIA T 911 t'! MYRTLE (:':jVF CLEfiRliJ(~ITEf;: r':L. :3;~:S ~;~)~/ .5.5 (1 :2L~:? GODWIN. ARTHOHIA T 1895 MC CAULEY RD C L. E::: (i F.~ v.) {>1 T E: F< F: L :~3 ~::;; ~/ ,~} ~5 ,1.~~, .1. ~;~ CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW HOUSING DMSION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 January 28, 2002 Mr. Tom Sehlhorst 1005 Amble Lane Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Case No. APP 02-01-01,1050 N. Myrtle Ave. Dear Mr. Sehlhorst, The above referenced Appeal has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board. The meeting will take place on March 19, 2002 at 2:00 p.rn. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4561. \. S.1erely yours, /)., . ,j(, 0L.4L0 L' 1 e Assistant Planning Director Cc: Garry Brumback Leslie Dougall-Sides S:\Planning Department\C D B\APPEM1.s.\$ehlhors,tMj)8ft-No1vJ:IlI)lFllhiliJiWenue\Sehlhorst 1050 n myrtle avenue CDJ3:NlJt\'Ce Ye~fe~~-COMMlSSIONER WHITI\"EY GRAY, COM~IISSIOI\"ER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSiONER ~ BILLjONSOI\", COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . ' . . ~,f~ .. CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, March 19, 2002, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!. Those ,cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff. neil!hborinl! property owners. etc. will be placed on a consent al!enda and approved by a sinl!le vote at the bel!inninl! of the meetinl!. 1. Tom Sehlhorst is requesting an appeal of a denial of an occupational license for vehicle service in the Commercial District for the property located at 1050 N. Myrtle Aye., J.J. Eldridge Sub, Elk E, N 126 ft of Elk E less Rd. APP 02-01-01 2. Equity Holdinl!s. Inc I Grel!ory Politis are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the following: front (east) setback along Patricia Avenue from 25 ft to 12 ft to pavement, front (south) setback along Drew Street from 25 ft to 10 ft to pavement, side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft to building, side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft to pavement, required number of parking spaces from 11 spaces (5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft of gross floor area) to 9 spaces (4 spaces per 1,000 sq ft of gross floor area) for a proposed retail sales and services establishment, and required number of parking spaces from 27 spaces (15 spaces per 1,000 sq ft of gross floor area) to 13 spaces (7 spaces per 1,000 sq ft of gross floor area) for a proposed restaurant, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704, with a Comprehensive Landscape Program (Proposed Use: The application includes a 4,068 sq ft single-story building with 2,268 sq ft retail sales and service establishment and an 1,800 sq ft restaurant) at 2004-2010 Drew S1., Skycrest Terrace Sub, Blk C, Lot 5 & S 50 ft of Lot 6. FL 01-12-36 3. HBH Power Corporation are requesting a flexible development approval to permit direct access to a major arterial road (North Ft. Harrison Avenue) within the Tourist District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803 (Proposed Use: Redevelopment of the site with a 24- unit condominium development, 50 ft in height, with access onto North Ft. Harrison Ave.) at 1860 N. Ft. Harrison Ave., Venetian Point Sub, Blk B, N 100 ft of S 321 ft of Lot 1. FI01-12-38 4. David M. & Nancy W. Richardson is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the required rear (north) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to deck) and reduce the required side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-504 (Proposed Use: The proposal includes a 330 sq ft, wood deck approximately 4 ft in height, in association with an existing single-family dwelling) at 1648 Sand Key Estates Ct., The Moorings of Sand Key, Lot 11. FL 02-01.01 5. City of Clearwater are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a governmental use (library) in the Downtown District under the provisions of Section 2-903 (Proposed Use: A new 90,000 sq ft, four-story main library) at 100 N. Osceola Ave., Sec. 16-29-15, M&B 12.07 & 12.08; Jeffords & Smoyers 1st Addition, Lots 1,4,5 and part of Lot 2; and Sunset Court, part of Lots A & B . FL 02-01-02 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in. . . Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567. Lisa Fierce Planning Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.o. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 Fr. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODA TION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 03/02/02 ~ I . . CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 CiTY HALL, 112 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4090 FAX (727) 562-4086 DEPARTMENT OF THE CiTY CLERK January 14, 2002 Certified Mail 7000 0520 0018 3949 3832 Tom Selhorst 1005 Amble Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 Dear Mr. Selhorst: You are hereby formally notified and requested to appear at an appeal hearing regarding the denial of your occupational license application. The hearing will be held before the Assistant City Manager, Garry Brumback on Thursday, January 24,2002, at 2:00pm in the Large Conference Room, City Hall, Third Floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue. If you have any questions, please call 562-4091. Sincerely, . , 1',\ ,: f .. .;~ ' ,J...,f ~ ' / I I \~~--L\l ,V,L G /,*;&..A_,k.~-.Q~____ \ ". \ ,........ .,...,/.-1 "- . ,\ \ . CynthiEt)E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk In cc: Garry Brumback, Asst. City Manager Leslie Dougall-Sides, City Attorney /Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director BRlAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, VICE MAYOR,COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BIUJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING Occupational License Appeal- Tom Selhorst January 24, 2002 - 2:00 p.m. DRAFT Present: Garry Brumback Leslie Dougall-Sides Cyndi Tarapani Brenda Moses Assistant City Manager Assistant City Attorney Planning Director Board Reporter Also Present: Mark Jacobson Tom Selhorst Glass America Appellant Appellant Exhibits: None City Exhibits: None Assistant City Manager, Garry Brumback, representing City Manager Bill Horne, opened the meeting at 2:01 p.m. Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides explained the rules governing the procedures as specified in 29.41 of the City Code of Ordinances. Appellant Tom Selhorst said he would proceed under protest as he had asked his case be heard in front of the City Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Brumback said Mr. Selhorst has 2 options: 1) a City Manager Designee appeal procedure, or 2) file a petition and pay a fee to request the COB (Community Development Board) review the request for appeal. Mr. Selhorst said he prefers to go before the COB. Ms. Dougall-Sides said Section 4-501A(4) of the Code of Ordinances specifies criteria regarding denials of licenses. Planning Director Cyndi Tarapani said that section of the Code contains a specific procedure, which requires 4 of the 7 members of the COB to agree to hear a case, and there are high standards to grant an appeal. Ms. Dougall-Sides said the criteria for granting an appeal by the COB, states that the COB must find that the decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions in the Code, the decision would be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Code, and it would not be detrimental to public health, safety and general welfare. An appeal to the COB requires 4 COB member votes to pull an item from the Consent Agenda. Ms. Dougall-Sides said there is a higher fee for that appeal process. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said as Mr. Selhorst is appealing to the COB rather than to the City Manager Designee, he must re-file his application of an appeal under Section 4-501 with the Planning Department indicating he is requesting his case be heard before the COB instead of the City Manager Designee. She stated she was unsure what date his case would be heard, as there are advertising deadlines associated with all applications. Mr. Selhorst distributed some items he felt the Planning Department is trying to push through to the Commission regarding amendments to the Community Development Code. Ms. Tarapani requested he add a cover letter to the information and submit it to her. In response to a question, Ms. Tarapani said Mr. Jacobson is permitted to perform those functions, which are permitted by his license. She referred to a license mah0102 1 01/24/02 . . issued to Glass America which indicates that auto glass replacement work done off premises, no work done on site, no outdoor storage, office use only. Mr. Selhorst referred to a license issued to him for another purpose. Ms. Tarapani said that license is not at issue at today's hearing. Mark Jacobson, Glass America, asked why he is being limited to certain functions. Ms. Tarapani said Mr. Selhorst has indicated he does not wish to proceed with today's hearing. She said that the property is zoned commercial and Mr. Jacobson is proposing to do vehicle service. The Code does not allow vehicle service as a use in the Commercial zoning district. Mr. Brumback concluded the proceedings at 2:16 p.m. mah0102 2 01/24/02 . ("~. ip Cc Ii< C( r7 cJlJftf/! (s:J(vP( I ft J) & iLe gr A {!Iefi ( 0 f2 !) T~ f' lJerL ( r:4 L () f1 0 tr~t/Al/tJi{I/( (~/ U-IItG e ' t <7~f\ c ,B ii $ {ri!r;f / s- e k ( ~T( f/L tf!- 11 /II D WI!4-'/ ? t9 (;!; (lJ L Y WL (I) 0E' f) ()7 ope U2A12-wlf't?-,e , / T f-I f1 S A () ;tl-/ b 0 CL ~/LehS{? I{ rLb A- C 0. l)I ft6 / G !5 C{ ~... V IJ v~ /"I!JIW ~ NO fe iv !2e(jtJuJe ilt({' fl r 1 f-t i2 ~t 'r ii) J1iI1.IL { ~ ( 0 i{ (}WJ2n Yl (] I /Il ~A Y\ "rY-oO i- () ~ 1(4 e afJItJ {7 use YtQsS vJ/l-L f3 e ~ o;;T-- /&/f[SrlL( {o Y0 /OOS!! M)j L e_ iA ~ ({2/itW/fY-tl ~(Pi ~~ 7J\) Y-& I S3GJ'- (f) ~ ( ) (; ~tf Please Print or Owner/Qualifier Name: -rOM ~e HLA(tl~6T tV &/4.,(11 U1r!€T L-~ If V ~ Street ~( If- State I.. . Date of Birt~: ,~. d...,J '17 Mailing address: 1 D I ( ~. Street Number -" \ .) ~.. L,.Ct City JUite or Apt # :J 2 ('- '-- , ~J tJ ' Zip Code Business Name: }j III ,~ (; Complete Company Name I /+:t41tA( (f1 Business Address: I o~- 0 w 0 Ii r~ !/vir ~T L~{J 14 (){: Street Nam(c (X State Suite or Apt # Street Numbe~ ) L- Lei City Zip Code Owner Home Phone: Business Phone: Date of Business Opening: Area Code Number Area code Number Month/Day/Year Individual 0 Partnership Corporation rlJ Please list officers and titles: Certification number (if required): I certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application may result in denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the City licensing division if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify I am the business owner or owner's legal agent. 'li()~ J;( /;iluJuIYT- rciOMj' jt1.sel'lU(t?~~{ I () - J'7(} tJ( Signature and Title Print Name Date Approval l/fes No Date Inspector Zoning ~ .~....... phi}; ,'::=:;;"'7/1. ) Traffic Engineering '-/ Building Police Fire Health Harbormaster Fic.lCorp. Other FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Category # Fee Date Issued Am!. Paid Total Owner I Group -- (\0 ~-:>\.J f-iv"-€-'7 '._ - CA~Jc'II'\.'+S 01\. <; I -k Occupational License App.doc .' ~. . -.t' ,,'/ T\i"-'\.. I ......,rt-eC \tJ~ . .I~~r--\ ,/ .'; .. . "I,...., ~ L") -;:; ~ V j ,,--'2- LA...) \/"'<:..1-?O... '~-'J \ "- 'c':: . '" i V 2.oc::- . 'l Lc)C':-~\....J&'..f\ We oc. ' ~ 4-. " ~ i ~ (A.... C"f:}- . . CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR PROPOSED US Property Address: o.s. 0 A) /11 R-t! s R'ff 14 f (J . /!uJ./) tJl4.5.S Proposed Use of Property: ~) ~l f> 0 r; Other: Sec. 137.007, Land Development Code, City of Clearwater, and Sec. AI03.9, Standard Building Code, state that a building shall not be occupied prior to issuance of a Certificate of OccupancylUse. Any Pinellas County Transportation Impact Fee must be paid prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. To the best of my knowledge, I certify that I am authorized to make application for the above-referenced property; that the land, building, and accessory structure(s) meets all applicable building, zoning, fire, safety, and health codes of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, State of Florida, Pinellas County and the City of Clearwater, and that this property will be used for the purpose(s) stated hereon. tji~ffk1- Name (please Print) jcl -L~ 1- () J Date i~~-// ( Signatu apco1Z95.kd& . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE OCL-0008018 THIS LICENSE MUST BE POSTED CONSPICUOUSLY IN PLACE OF BUSINESS GLASS AMERICA LLC 14513 N NEBRASKA AVE TAMPA FL 33613 GLASS AMERICA LLC 1050 N MYRTLE AVE CLEARWATER FL Phone: 727-447-1501 Category 038280 CONTRACTOR: INSTALLATION, NOC Quantity 1 Auto glass replacement work done off premises- no work done on site - no outdoor storage - office use only Qb~~ \ LICENSE YEAR PERIOD BEGINNING PERIOD ENDING ;)bD ISSUE DATE 2001-2002 OCTOBER 1, 2001 SEPTEMBER 30, ~ Dec 31, 2001 ..r FEE TYPE CHECK NO RECEIPT FEE TOTAL RECEIVED REN THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE DOES NOT PERMIT THE LICENSEE TO VIOLATE ANY ZONING LAWS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER NOR DOES IT EXEMPT THE LICENSEE FROM ANY OTHER LICENSE, PERMIT OR IMPOSED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES. ANY CHANGE IN LOCATION, BUSINESS NAME, OR OWNERSHIP MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ~ ..1 ~ C1"-... --r DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR NON-REFUNDABLE F:!e Ed:t Options 'vVindow Help ~ ~ '<"', ~~~~ ~* ,,~;'<;: . < ~,: <f~ r ~'C:~\~ ' Perml,..>I<Plan <ft ~': ~:\{, ,:' ,. ,>,'t,:~4~' ... "~ '-'1" " . ~ 29.41 CLEARWATER CODE an application pursuant to subsection (5) of this section shall have the right of appeal as specified in section 29.44. (Code 1980, ~ 71.12; Ord. No. 5835-95, ~ 5, 5-18- 95) Sec. 29.42. Provisional license. (1) The director of central permitting shall issue a provisional license, whenever a police background investigation is required by a certain occupational classification or subclassification, as long as the applicant has satisfied all other licens- ing requirements except for completion of the police investigation and as long as the applicant has completed the information requested on the background information report and the personal data report used by the police department in conducting the background investigation. At such time as a favorable police investigation is re- ceived, the provisional designation shall. be re- moved and the license shall have the character of a regularly issued license for the classification or subclassification involved. A provisional license shall be no less effective than a regular license, except that such license shall be considered void ab initio upon receipt by the director of central permitting of a completed police investigative report which contains information which, ifknown by the inspector at the time of application, would have been grounds for denial of the application. (2) Upon receipt of a police investigative report containing information that the applicant is not qualified to obtain an occupational license pursu- ant to the requirements contained in section 29.41(5), the director of central permitting shall notify the applicant of the denial within 30 days of the receipt of the investigative report. The direc- tor of central permitting shall state the reasons for the denial in writing, specifying the particular grounds for such denial. The applicant shall have the right of appeal as specified in section 29.44. (Code 1980, ~ 71.32; Ord. No. 5835-95, ~ 6, 5-18- 95) Sec. 29.43. Registration of exempt persons or organizations. Any natural person, partnership, organization, corporation or other entity which would be re- Supp. No. 11 C}cc.Ji (j~tGl Li u:>~\ S e." quired to obtain an occupational license pursuant to this article but for the exemptions permitted by F.S. ch. 205 shall register with the city manager and complete an appropriate application which shall disclose the address of the business, the nature of the business, and such other relevant information as the city manager may request to support the claimed exemption. There shall be no fee required for such application and registration and reregistration shall not be required unless the address of the business or the character or nature of the business is changed. (Code 1980, ~ 71.34) Sec. 29.44. Appeals. Any applicant or licensee who has been denied the issuance or transfer of an occupational license pursuant to section 29.31, 29.38 or 29.41(5) shall have the right of appeal to the city manager. Within ten calendar days from the date the city notifies the applicant or licensee of the city's decision to deny the issuance or transfer of an occupational license, the applicant or licensee shall file with the city clerk a. written statement fully setting forth the grounds for such appeal. Upon the filing of such written statement, the city clerk shall notify the city manager, who shall schedule and conduct a hearing before the city manager within 30 days after the filing of the written statement. The applicant or licensee shall be given written notice of the hearing by certified mail return receipt requested and shall have an opportunity to present evidence on his or her behalf, to cross examine witnesses, and to be represented by counsel. The city shall have the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evi- dence, and the city manager's decision shall be based solely on the evidence presented at the hearing. Within ten calendar days of the hearing, the city manager shall file with the city clerk's office and shall serve on the applicant or licensee a written decision containing findings of fact and conclusions of the legal basis for the decision. The decision of the city manager shall be final and conclusive, subject to judicial review by common law certiorari in the circuit court for Pinellas County. The applicant or licensee may abate the enforcement of the denial by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari and obtaining a temporary in- junction or temporary restraining order. (Code 1980, ~ 71.35; Ord. No. 5835-95, ~ 7, 5-18- 95) CD29:10 . . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND OTHER PROCEDURES b. Change in occupancy or use of an existing nonresidential building. c. Change in the use of land, building or structure. 2. No occupancy permit shall be issued un- less it has been determined that the build- ing or structure and the site complies with the provisions of the Building Code, this Development Code and prior approv- als upon which the building permit was based. B. Procedure. 1. All applications for occupancy permits shall be submitted in a form required by the building official. 2. In the event a valid building permit is not in effect, upon receipt of an application for the occupancy permit, the building official shall forward a copy of the application to the community development coordinator in order to determine whether the appli- cation conforms to an approved level one or level two approval. Upon receipt of the determination of the community develop- ment coordinator that the application does conform, the building official shall deter- mine whether the application conforms to all applicable requirements contained in the building code. 3. If a valid building permit is still in effect, upon receipt of an application for an oc- cupancy permit, the building official shall determine by inspection whether the work authorized by the building permit has been completed in accordance with the approved plans. 4. If the building official determines that the work does conform, the occupancy permit shall be issued. If the building official determines that the application does not conform, he shall identify the application's deficiencies and deny the application. C. Appeal. A denial of a certificate of occu- pancy may be appealed in the manner provided in Article 4 Division 5. (Ord. No. 6417-99, S 12, 8-19-99) Supp. No.1 S 4-206 Section 4-205. Occupational license. A. Applicability. Any person required to obtain an occupational license in order to conduct busi- ness within the city pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 29, Article II of the city's Code, shall obtain such license after the issuance of an occu- pancy permit. B. Procedure. 1. All applications for occupational licenses shall be prepared on forms available from the city manager. 2. Upon receipt of an application for an occupational license, the city manager shall forward a copy of the application to the community development coordinator who shall review the application to determine if the occupation conforms to applicable provisions of this development code and any prior approvals. 3. Upon receipt of a determination by the community development coordinator that the occupation does conform to applicable provisions of this development code and prior approvals, then the city manager shall review the application and deter- mine whether the occupation conforms to all applicable requirements of Chapter 29, Article II of the city's Code. 4. Following review and determination as to conformance by both the community de- velopment coordinator and the city man- ager, the city manager shall either issue the occupational license or deny the ap- plication. C. Appeal. A denial of an occupational license may be appealed in the manner provided in Article 4 Division 5. (Ord. No. 6526-00, S 1, 6-15-00) Section 4-206. Notices and public hearings. A. Applicability. The procedures set out in this section shall be applicable to all public hearings required by any provision of this development code. All public hearings shall be conducted in accordance with Florida law. CD4: 11 . . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND OTHER PROCEDURES B. Other revisions. Any other adjustments or changes not specified as "minor" shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures for origi- nal approval. Section 4-407. Expiration of approval. Unless otherwise specified in the approval, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of the date of the level two approval, and all required certificates of occu- pancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Permitted time frames do not change with succes- sive owners and an extension of time may be granted by the community development board for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Transfer of devel- opment rights are exempt from this provision. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) DIVISION 5. APPEALS Section 4-501. Authority and purpose. A. The community development board has the authority to hear appeals from: 1. Administrative interpretations ofthis de- velopment code. 2. Orders, requirements, decisions or deter- minations made by an administrative of- ficial in the administration of this devel- opment code, except for enforcement actions. 3. Level one approval decisions. 4. Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions of this Code. B. The hearing officer has the authority to hear appeals from: 1. Decisions of the community development board regarding level two "approvals. 2. Decisions of the community development board regarding level one approvals. 3. [Reserved. ] (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) Supp. No.1 ~ 4-504 Section 4-502. Application/notice of appeal. A. An appeal of a level one approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval within seven days of the date the devel- opment order is issued. The filing of an application! notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the deci- sion pending the final determination of the case. B. An application!notice of appeal of any deci- sion of the city, as provided in section 4-501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be filed with the city clerk in a form specified by the community development coordinator identifying with specificity the basis for the appeal and accompanied by a fee as required by section 4-202(E). The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. C. No building permit shall be issued for a Level '!\vo or Level Three approval prior to the expiration of the appeal period. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) Section 4-503. Staff review, report and rec- ommendation. Mter the community development coordinator has reviewed the application! notice of appeal in accordance with the provisions of section 4-202(C) and (D), the coordinator shall send a written recommendation to the community development board, or the hearing officer, if applicable, with a copy to the applicant, setting forth whether the appeal should be granted or denied and the grounds for such recommendation. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) Section 4-504. Community development board appeals. A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, upon receipt of the recommendation of the community development coordinator regard- ing appeals from decisions set out in section 4-501(A), the community development board shall review the application, the recommendation of the community development coordinator, conduct CD4:19 . . ~ 4-504 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application in accordance with the requirements of section 4-206 and render a decision in accordance with the provisions of section 4-206(D5) granting the appeal, granting the appeal subject to specified conditions or denying the appeal. B. Upon receipt of an application/notice of ap- peal from a level one approval (flexible standard) from an abutting property owner, the community development board shall place the appeal on the consent agenda of the next scheduled meeting of the board. Notice of the date of such meeting shall be provided the applicant and the appellant(s) by mail and by telephone. The appeal may be re- moved from the consent agenda only by a vote of at least four members of the community develop- ment board. If the appeal is not removed from the consent agenda, it shall be approved, along with any other consent agenda items, by a vote of a majority of the members of the board. If the appeal is removed from the consent agenda, the community development board shall review the application, the recommendation of the commu- nity development coordinator, conduct a quasi- judicial public hearing on the application in ac- cordance with the requirements of section 4-206 and render a decision in accordance with the provisions of section 4-206(D)(5) granting the appeal, granting the appeal subject to specified conditions or denying the appeal. C. In order to grant an appeal, overturning or modifying the decision appealed from, the com- munity development board shall find that based on substantial competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party: 1. The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of this development code; Supp. No.1 CD4:20 2. That the decision will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this development code; and 3. Will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Section 4-505. Hearing officer appeals. A. Upon receipt of a notice of appeal regarding decisions set out in Section 4-501(B), the hearing officer shall, in concert with the city clerk, estab- lish a timely date and hour and location for a quasi-judicial hearing. The city clerk shall give notice of the public hearing in accordance with the provisions of section 4-206(C) and the hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the proce- dures set forth in section 4-206(D). B. The record before the community develop- ment board shall be incorporated into the record before the hearing officer, supplemented by such additional evidence as may be brought forward during the hearing. C. The burden shall be upon the appellant to show that the decision of the community develop- ment board cannot be sustained by the evidence before the board and before the hearing officer, or that the decision of the board departs from the essential requirements of law. D. The hearing officer shall render a decision within 45 days of the hearing in accordance with the provisions of section 4-206 (D5). The decision of the hearing officer shall be final, subject to judicial review by common law certiorari to the circuit court. The filing of a petition for certiorari stays the decision of the hearing officer pending the final determination of the case. !i 4-202 . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE . ment coordinator shall notify the appli- cant of the reasons that the application is legally insufficient, that the application is deemed withdrawn and no further devel- opment review shall be conducted until the application is resubmitted. D. Review by development review committee. Mer an application for development approval is determined to be complete and legally sufficient, the development review committee shall review the application in accordance with Division 3 of this Article if a level one approval, Division 4 if a level two approval and Division 6 if a level three approval. E. Issuance of development order. The commu- nity development coordinator shall issue a devel- opment order for Level One (flexible standard) approval. F. Fees. Except for those applications submit- ted on behalf of governmental agencies, all appli- cations for development approval shall be accom- panied by the payment of a fee established from time-to-time by the city commission and main- tained as Appendix A to the City Code. G. Resubmission of application affecting same property. 1. No application shall be accepted during the following time periods after the denial of a substantially similar application af- fecting the same property or any portion thereof: a. Nine months for level two approvals. b. Twelve months for level three approv- als. 2. The time periods specified in this subsec- tion shall be deemed to have commenced only after the completion of any adminis- trative or judicial review which may have been sought. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) Section 4-203. Building permit. A. Permit required. 1. No person shall commence any construc- tion, demolition, modification or renova- tion of a building or structure without first obtaining a building permit. Supp. No. 1 2. No seawall, bulkhead, groin, marine im- provement, bridge or other similar ma- rine structure shall be built within the city until the building official has issued a building permit for such work. 3. A building permit shall authorize only the use, arrangement and/or construction de- scribed in level one and two approvals and no other use, arrangement or construc- tion. 4. Complete engineering and architectural plans for each component of a develop- ment project shall be required to be sub- mitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. For any phased project, such plans shall be required for each phase of the development. B. Procedure: All applications for building per- mits shall be submitted in a form required by this Development Code and the building official. Upon receipt of an application, including a declaration of unity of title, in accordance with Article 4 Division 16, the building official shall forward a copy to the community development coordinator in order to determine whether the application conforms to an approved level one or level two approval. Upon receipt of the determination of the community development coordinator, the building official shall determine whether the application conforms to all applicable requirements contained in the building code. If the building official deter- mines that the application does conform, the building permit shall be issued. If the building official determines that the application does not conform, he shall identify the application's defi- ciencies and deny the application. C. Appeal: A denial of a building permit may be appealed in the manner provided in Article 4 Division 5. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) Section 4-204. Occupancy permit. A. Applicability. 1. A certificate of occupancy shall be re- quired for the following: a. Occupancy and use ofland or a build- ing hereafter improved, erected, struc- turally altered, reconstructed, en- larged or moved. CD4:10 . . APPENDIX A-SCHEDULE OF FEES, RATES AND CHARGES 3. Tent permit (may require electric) up to 20 feet by 40 feet. . . . . . . . . . . . . 40.00 Tent permit (may require electric) greater than 20 feet by 40 feet. . . . . . 50.00 4. Demolition permit. . . . . .... . .. . . . .. . . .. '" " . . . .... .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.00 Plus, per square foot in excess of 1,000 square feet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.10 (No fee charged when demolition is ordered by city) 5. House move: a. Application.. .... . .. " . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . '" .. . .... .. " " . . . . . . . . 53.00 b. Preinspection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53.00 Plus, per mile outside city. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.30 c. Remodeling permit, for setting house on lot, see subparagraph (2)(f) permit fees. 6. Swimming pool permit, aboveground pool (for all work involved) . . . . . . . 37.00 7. Zoning verification letter, per letter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.00 8. Project research, per hour (not to exceed eight hours without commission approval) ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26.00 (h) Building official may assess special fees per written policy for: 1. Work not ready for.inspection (reinspection fee): a. First occurrence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.00 b. Second or subsequent occurrence. " .... . .... ... .. . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . 80.00 2. Followup on permit: a. Failure to request inspections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 50% of permit fee b. Minimum fee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37.00 3. Mter-the-fact permit: a. First occurrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Triple permit fee b. Second or subsequent occurrence by same contractor, any job site in city. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10 times permit fee 4. Filing service fee, for notice of commencement (this is in addition to county clerk's charges). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 CD Permit extensions: 1. Permit expired: a. Less than 30 days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. More than 30 days, but less than 90 days ....................... c. More than 90 days (fee based on value of work to be completed). . . Exception, if only finals are needed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) As used in this fee schedule, "combination permit" means a permit for construction privileges, conditions and restrictions for two or more trades or permit types for which proper approval has been granted by the city and for which proper fees have been paid. Filing fees for appeals. (1) Appeal to the construction/flood board of adjustment and appeals. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . (2) Appeal to the city manager. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Supp. No.4 CDA:5 No fee 30.00 New permit fee 30.00 130.00 55.00 (3) Appeal to the city commission. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Development impact fees: (1) For all new buildings and structures, the applicant shall at the time the building permit is issued pay a development impact fee as follows: (a) New residential structures, single-family, apartment, condominium or mobile home, per unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) New commercial structures, for each 2,500 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) New industrial structures, for each 5,000 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) New hotel or motel facilities: 1. Per unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Commercial area other than units, for each 2,500 square feet offloor area or fraction thereof. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) The funds derived from these fees shall be deposited in a special account to be used exclusively for the construction of roads, public transit facilities and storm drainage in the city, including actual construction costs, acquisition of right-of-way, the construction of sidewalks, curbs, drainage structures and signal installations. (Ord. No. 5120, ~ 3, 8-15-91; Ord. No. 5887-95, ~ 1, 8-17-95; Ord. No. 6084-96, ~ 1, 11-7-96; Ord. No. 6146-97, ~ 1,6-19-97; Ord. No. 6499-00, ~ 1, 2-3-00) VIII. LAND DEVELOPMENT: . . APPENDIX A-SCHEDULE OF FEES, RATES AND CHARGES 55.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 There is hereby established the following fees and charges relating to review and processing of Level One, Level '!\vo and Level Three applications: (1) Level One. (a) Minimum standard development applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Zoning verification letter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Zoning interpretation letter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Minor lot adjustment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Flexible standard development-Single family and two family properties- Accessory useslstructures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Flexible standard development-Single family and two family properties. . . . . . . . . (g) Flexible standard development-Multi-family and commercial properties. . . . . . . . . (h) Continuances of a DRC meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) Level Two. (a) Flexible development-Single family and two family properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Flexible development-Multi-family and commercial property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Appeals to the community development board-Residential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Appeals to the community development board-Nonresidential. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Appeals to hearing officer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Supp. No.4 CDA:6 Ne Fee $25.00 50.00 150.00 50.00 100.00 475.00 75.00 200.00 1,205.00 100.00 250.00 500.00 . . ~ 8-102 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ing a telecommunications service to retail custom- ers in the city or providing a government service. Utilities I infrastructure facility means an elec- tric or gas substation, stormwater management facilities, water or wastewater pumping station, telephone repeater station or similar structure used as an intermediary switching, boosting, dis- tribution or transfer station or lines for electricity, cable television, or telephone services between the point of generation and the end user, but not including satellite dish antennas, facilities for the handling of solid waste, or radio, television, or relay towers. Vehicle means any automobile, motorcycle, truck, motorized van, recreation vehicle, bicycle, or any other device on or in which any person or property is or may be transported upon a highway, except devices used exclusively on stationary rails or tracks. Vehicle service means an activity conducted entirely within an enclosed structure primarily involved in servicing or repairing of automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, boats, recreational vehicles and other similarly sized vehicular or transport mechanisms or heavy machinery. Vehicle services include washing, waxing, changing oil, tuning, installing mufflers or detailing, window tinting, shock absorbers, and painting. Vehicle service, limited means an activity con- ducted within a structure which primarily in- volves the routine maintenance of automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, boats, and recreational vehi- cles. Limited vehicle service includes only wash- ing, waxing, changing oil, detailing, and window tinting. Vehicle service, major means vehicle repairs which include engine repairs where the cylinder head, pan or exhaust mainfold is removed; steam cleaning of engines; undercoating; vehicle spray painting; auto glass repair and replacement; re- pair and replacement of transmission, differen- tial, transaxles, shaft and universal joints, wheel and steering linkages and assemblies; rebuilding and upholstering the interior of vehicles; custom- izing, restoration or rebuilding of vehicles; chas- sis, frame, body, fender and bumper molding, straightening, replacement and finishing; and Supp. No.1 repairs involving extensive welding, racing of engines or lengthy or overnight idling of engines. Vehicle sales / displays means a business or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale or rental of automobiles, small trucks and vans, boats no more than 20 feet in length and other small vehicular or transport mechanisms and including vehicle service. Vehicle sales/displays, limited means a busi- ness or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale or rental of bicycles, mopeds, and motorcycles and excluding service of such vehi- cles. Vehicle sales I displays, major means a business or commercial activity involving the display and/or sale or rental of boat and marine vessels, recre- ational vehicles, heavy equipment, mobile homes, and other vehicular or transport mechanisms and including vehicle service. Vehicle, inoperative means a vehicle designed to be operated on the public street that is in a state of disrepair and incapable of being moved under its own power, or a vehicle that is incapable of being operated lawfully on the streets of the state. A vehicle shall be deemed inoperative if a current registration tag, also known as a license plate, of a kind required under state law as a condition of operation upon the public streets is not affixed thereto, or if one or more parts which are required for the operation of the vehicle are missing, were dismantled, are inoperative or are not attached to the vehicle as designed. Vested means having the right to develop or continue development notwithstanding the com- prehensive plan or the provisions of this develop- ment code. Veterinary offices means a facility used by vet- erinarians to treat and examine animals, includ- ing accessory indoor boarding of animals. No outdoor kennels or animal runs are allowed. Violation of itinerant or transient nature means a violation that is likely to be temporary, short- lived, and portable in nature or capable of being repeated or that will by its nature dissipate or evidence of which will not be available at a later date, including but not limited to: placement of CD8:34 ~ -1- <{ co CD N 'R 41 8- ~ "'I .!C ~ ~ .. -0 .. Q) ~ a. m '? ;;; N o ~ o (ij ~ o ~ -0 ai ~ g 5 ~ o <( u o f- :> S z (5 ~ (f) .. 277 A ----- "" .... 2598 '00 -- -- -- -- -- r----_ L_ --- -- -- --- ---. --- ---- CITY OF CLEARWATER AIlD V1CIIIlTY PlIlElUS COUlltY, ~R1DA PREPARED BV PUBUC WORKS ADlIINISTRATlON ENGINEERINC too S. N)file .l'o'e., Oe<<Jrater. Fl 33756 Ph.: (813)562-4750. rOI: (513)526-4755 hitpo; Iln'tll,claof.ol<<-fl.com/cltgl(leer / Public rnfl)(rnCltlon dota Is turnl,...ed by the Cfty Or Cle-orwol.r Public Worke ~mlnl'trotlon/En91n."'lnq. ond mutt be accepted Clod u,ed by the recIpient with the undel'~tandInQ ttlot the dato recel~d was collected fOl' Ihe purpose of develop!n9 0 qrophlc: lnfrostruc:lure If'tvmtor)'. As 1IIJch, It.. City of Cleorwotrt PWA/t mole.. "0 worrCln'''" export..td or Implied, cOf'Cltrnlf\q lh. OCCUfClCY. comPietenetl. reliability, 0( sultoblllty of this data for ony other Pllf!iwlor Ute. FurtherrnOfl', Ihe City of Oeor'Noh:r PWA/E o.wrn~s 1'10 liobillty whahlal!wt oS5odoted with (he uu or mi"'H of w(:h dolo. '; = lhlil AUo, P4qt I. sub jeet to period\e cl'lal'lqe.. rOt II'Iformotlol'l about lalell tevisl'Of'Is pleoS4! coli PWA;t IX ...isit our Web site. N EB 100 200 400 600 I I I .-J SCALE: 1" = 400' LEGEND: @ BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ADDRESS CI TY LIMITS LINE EEi3 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS " AGREEMENT TO ANNEX . CITY OWNED PROPERTY M DR ZONING DESIGN A TION - ZONE LINE - 1fEl~~O am. m 5JO!i1 DV/llS/9] W SJit ot/JS/U REVISED: 10/18/99 ZONING ATLAS' 2688 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 9 - 29 S - 15 E . . " 9 2-603 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Clearwater with convenient access to goods and services throughout the city without adversely impacting the integrity of residential neighbor- hoods, diminishing the scenic quality of the city or negatively impacting the safe and efficient move- ment of people and things within the City of Clearwater. Section 2-701.1. Maximum development po- tential. DIVISION 7. COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ("C") The Commercial District ("C") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the C District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the C District shall be determined by the standards found in this Development Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. Development potential for the Countywide Fu- ture Land Use Designations that apply to the C District are as follows: Section 2-701. Intent and purpose. The intent. and purpose of the Commercial District is to provide the citizens of the City of Countywide Future Maximum Dwelling Units Maximum Floor Area Ratio/ Overnight Accommodations Land Use Designation per Acre of Land Impervious Surface Ratio Units per Acre Commercial Neighborhood 10 dweUing units per acre FAR .40/ISR .80 N/A Commercial Limited 18 dwelling units per acre FAR .45/ISR .85 30 units per acre Commercial General . 24 dwelling units per acre FAR .55/ISR .95 40 units per acre Residential/OfficelRetail 18 dwelling units per acre FAR .4O/ISR .85 30 units per acre Section 2-702. Minimum standard develop- ment. standards set out in this section and other appli- cable provisions of Article 3. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the "C" District subject to the minimum Table 2-702. .C" District Minimum Development Standards Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking Spaces Governmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4/1,000 SF GFA 5/1000 SF GFA Indoor Recreation! Enterlain- 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 or 5llane, ment 2/court or 1/ma- chine Marinas 5,000 50 25 15 10 20 1 space per 2 slips Supp. No.1 CD2:46 . . ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-703 ,. Table 2-702. "C" District Minimum Development Standards Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft.) Front (ft.) (ft.) (ft) Parking Spaces Offices 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4/1,000 SF GFA Overnight Accommodations 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 l/unit 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as determined by the community Parks and recreational facilities n/a nJa 25 25 10 20 development coordinator based on ITE Manual stan- dards Places of Worship 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 1 per 2 seats Restaurants 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 15/1,000 SF GFA Retail Sales and Services 10,000 100 25 25 10 120 5/1,000 SF GFA Vehicle SaleslDisplay 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 2.5/1,000 SF Lot Area (1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to institutional which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. COrd. No. 6526-.00, 9 1, 6-15-00) Section 2-703. Flexible standard develop- ment. and criteria set out "in this Section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the "C" District subject to the standards Table 2-703. "C" District Flexible Standard Development Standard Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) (ft) Front (ft.) * (ft) (ft) Parking Spaces Accessory Dwellings nJa nJa nJa nJa nJa n/a 1 space per unit Adult Uses 5,000 50 25 25 10 20 5 per 1,000 GFA Alcoholic Beverage Sales 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5 per 1,000 GFA Automobile Service Stations 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 5/1,000 SF GFA Educational Facilities 40,000 200 25 25 10 20 1 per 2 stu- dents Governmental Uses(l) 10,000 100 25-50 25 10 20 4 spaces per 1,000 GFA Supp. No. 1 CD2:47 . . .. S 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Table 2-703. "C" District Flexible Standard Development Standard Max. Min. Lot Area Min. Lot Height Min. Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) ( ft.) Front (ft.)* ( ft.) (ft.) Parking Spaces 3-5/1000 SF Indoor RecreationlEntertain- 100 25 25 10 20 GFA or 3-5/ ment 10,000 lane, 1-2/court or l/machine Marina Facilities 5,000-20,000 50 25 25 10 20 1 space per 2 slips Medical clinics 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 2-3/1,000 GFA Nightclubs 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 10,000 100 25-50 25 0-10 10-20 3-4 spaces per 1,000 GFA Off-Street Parking 10,000 100 n/a 25 10 20 n/a Outdoor Retail Sales, Display 20,000 100 25 25 10 20 10 per 1,000 of and/or Storage land area Overnight Accommodations 20,000-40,000 150-200 25-50 25 0-10 10-20 1 per unit Places ofWorship(2) 20,000- 100-200 25-50 25 10 20 .5-1 per 2 seats 40,000 Public Transportation Facili- n/a n/a 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a ties(3) Restaurants 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-35 25 0-10 10-20 7-15 spaces per 1,000 GFA Retail Sales and Services 3,500-10,000 35-100 25-35 25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per 1,000 GFA UtilitylInfrastructure Facili- n/a n/a 20 25 10 20 n/a ties(4) 2.5 spaces per Vehicle SaleslDisplays 20,000-40,000 150-200 25 25 10 20 1,000 of lot area Veterinary Offices or Animal 10,000 100 25 25 10 20 4 spaces per Grooming and Boarding 1,000 GFA *The front setback may be reduced to 15 feet for parking lots provided the land area is not sufficient to accommodate the full setback requirement and the reduction results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and landscaping is in excess of the minimum required. (1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (2) Places of worship shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (3) Public transportation facilities shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to TransportationlUtility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. Stipp. No.1 CD2:48 . . ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-703 .. (4) Utility/Infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. Flexibility criteria: A Accessory dwelling. One accessory dwelling, which is subordinate and accessory to a principal permitted use provided that: 1. Title to the accessory dwelling is vested in the ownership of the principal use; 2. The floor area of the accessory dwelling does not exceed 25 percent of the floor area of the principal use. Supp. No.1 B. Adult uses. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on U.S. 19; 2. The use complies with each and every requirement of Division 3 of Article 3. C. Alcoholic beverage sales. 1. The .parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or a public or private school, unless the floor area of the use which is devoted to the display and storage of alcoholic beverages is less than ten percent of the total floor area of the use and there is no signage located on the parcel proposed for devel- opment which identifies the use as a loca- tion where alcoholic beverages are sold; 3. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or a public or private school unless the inter- vening land uses, structures or context are such that the location of the alcoholic beverage sales is unlikely to have an adverse impact on such school or use as a place of worship. CD2:49 D. Automobile service stations. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The use does not involve the overnight, outdoor storage of automobiles; 3. No more than two service bays front on a public street. E. Educational facilities. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a road with at least four lanes; 2. The proposed development does not have an access which connects to a local street at a point more than 100 feet from the four lane road on which the parcel pro- posed for development fronts. F. Governmental uses. 1. Height. a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any contiguous residential prop- erty. G. Indoor recreation I entertainment. 1. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. . .. . g 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE H. Marina facilities. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not located in areas identified in the Com- prehensive Plan as areas of environmen- tal significance including: a. The north end of Clearwater Beach; b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds; Cooper's Point; Clearwater Harbor spoil islands; Sand Key Park; c. d. e. f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake. 2. No commercial activities other than the mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be permitted on any parcel of land which is contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas, unless the marina facility is totally screened from view from the contiguous land which is designated as residential and the hours of operation of the commer- cial activities are limited to the time pe- riod between sunrise and sunset. 3. Lot area: The parcel proposed for develop- ment was an existing lot of less than 20,000 square feet and was not in com- mon ownership with any contiguous prop- erty on May 1, 1998 or the reduction in lot width will not result in a facility which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. I. Medical clinics. 1. The use and design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the surrounding area. 2. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses ofthe property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. Supp. No.1 CD2:50 J. Offices. 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping area in excess of the minimum required or improved design and appearance. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 2. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 3. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building are for storage or other non-parking demand gen- eration purposes. K. Nightclubs. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for purposes of a place of wor- ship or a public or private school unless the intervening land uses, structures or context are such that the location of the nightclub is unlikely to have an adverse impact on such school or use as a place of worship. . . ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-703 L. Off-street parking. 1. Access to and from the parking lot shall be based on the size and design of the lot and approved by the Community Devel- opment Coordinator. 2. All outdoor lighting is so designed and located so that no light fixtures cast light directly on to adjacent land. 3. If the parking lot is adjacent to residen- tially used or zoning property, such off- street parking spaces shall be screened by a wall or fence of at least four feet in height which is landscaped on the exter- nal side with a continuous hedge or non- deciduous vine. M. Outdoor retail sales, display and lor stor- age. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas unless the principal use is the sale of living plant material; 2. No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line ofthe parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved comprehensive sign pro- gram; 3. All buildings located on the parcel pro- posed for development are finished or painted in earth tone colors; 4. No cyclone, chainlink or other metal mesh fences are located on the parcel proposed for development; 5. All fences, excluding gates, are land- scaped on the exterior of such fences with continuous shrubs or vines and trees lo- cated 20 feet on center; 6. No goods and materials other than living plant material which are stored or dis- played outside a building or structure are located within a required setback; Supp. No.1 CD2:51 7. The parcel proposed for outdoor storage or display fully conforms to the require- ments of Article 3 Division 7 in regard to landscaping; 8. The height of non-living goods and mate- rials stored or displayed outdoors shall not exceed 15 feet; 9. No building materials or automobile parts or supplies which are stored or displayed outdoors shall be visible from a public right-of-way. N. Overnight accommodations. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program. 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; . . S 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE b. The reduction in side or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side or rear setback does not reduce the amount of land- scaped area otherwise required. O. Places of worship. 1. Lot area: a. The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- posed for development; b. The reduction in lot area does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; c. The reduction in lot area results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and ap- pearance; d. The reduction in lot area does not reduce the day/night activity level along building facades on public streets. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. Off-street parking: The total number of off-street parking spaces including off-site parking spaces within 600 feet of the parcel proposed for development will be available on a shared basis to meet the peak period demands of the facility. 4. Supp. No.1 CD2:52 5. Lot width. The parcel proposed for devel- opment was an existing lot of less than 200 feet and was not in common owner- ship with any contiguous property on May 1, 1998 or the reduction in lot width will not result in building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for devel- opment. P. Public transportation facilities. 1. The public transportation facilities are not located within 1,000 feet of another public transportation facility unless nec- essary to serve established transit stops with .demonstrated ridership demand; 2. The public transportation facilities are designed, located and landscaped so that the structures are screened from view from any residential use or land desig- nated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. Any lighting associated with the public transportation facilities is designed and located so that no light is cast directly on any residential use or land designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. Q. Restaurants. 1. Lot area and width: The parcel proposed for development was an existing lot ofless than 10,000 square feet and was not in common ownership with any contiguous property on May 1, 1998 or the reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing build- ings in the immediate vicinity of the par- cel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; . . ZONING DISTRICTS b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such sign age is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 6. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- mg purposes; b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the num- ber of off-street parking spaces. R. Retail sales and service. 1. Lot size and width: The parcel proposed for development was an existing lot ofless than 10,000 square feet and was not in common ownership with any contiguous property on May 1, 1998. 2. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- Supp. No.1 CD2:53 9 2-703 ~ eas m excess of the mInImum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any contiguous residential prop- erty. 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses ofthe property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions ofthe building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. S. Utility / infrastructure facilities. 1. No above ground structures are located adjacent to a street right-of-way; 2. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees and hedges which five years after installation will substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure. T. Vehicle sales /displays. 1. The gross floor area of enclosed buildings is at least 7,000 square feet; . . S 2-703 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. No area suitable for the display of vehi- cles for sale is located within the front setback of the parcel proposed for devel- opment; 4. Provision is made to dim outdoor lighting at all times when the automobile sales and service uses is not open to the public to that level necessary to maintain the security of the premises; 5. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street. U. Veterinary offices, or animal grooming / boarding. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment does not involve animal confine- ment facilities that are open to the out- side. (Ord. No. 6417-99, ~ 3, 8-19-99; Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) Section 2-704. Flexible development. The following uses are Level Two permitted uses in the "C" District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-704. "C" District Flexible Development Standards Min. Lot Max. Min. Min. Lot Area Width Height Front Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) ( ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 5 per 1,000 GFA Determined by the community development Comprehensive Infill coordinator nJa nJa nJa nJa nJa nJa based on the Redevelopment Project(l) specific use and/or ITE Manual stan- dards Light Assembly 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per 1,000 GFA Limited Vehicle Service 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4-5 spaces per 1,000 GFA Mixed Use 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 4--5 spaces per 1,000 GFA Nightclubs 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 3--4 spaces per 1,000 GFA Off-Street Parking 10,000 100 nJa 15-25 0-10 10-20 nJa Supp. No.1 CD2:54 . . ., ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-704 Table 2-704. "COO District Flexible Development Standards Min. Lot Max. Min. Min. Lot Area Width Height Front Min. Side Min. Rear Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Parking 1-10 per 1,000 SQ FT of land area or as de- Outdoor Recreation/Entertain- termined by the ment 20,000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 community de- velopment coor- dinator based on ITE Manual standards Overnight Accommodations 20,000--40,000 100-200 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 1 per unit Problematic Uses 5,000 50 25 15-25 10 10-20 5 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA Restaurants 3,500-10,000 35-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 7-15 spaces per 1,000 GFA Retail Sales and Services 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 4--5 spaces per 1,000 GFA RV Parks 40,000 200 25 15-25 20 10-20 1 space per RV space 1 per 20 units Self Storage 20,000 100 25 15-25 10 10-20 plus 2 for manager's of- fice Social/Public Service Agen- 5,000-10,000 50-100 25-50 15-25 0-10 10-20 3--4 spaces per cies(2) 1,000 GFA Refer to Telecommunication Towers 10,000 100 section 25 10 20 nJa 3-2001 2.5 spaces per Vehicle Sales/Displays 10,000--40,000 100-200 25 15-25 10 10-20 1,000 SQ FT of lot area Veterinary Offices or Grooming 5,000-10,000 50-100 25 15-25 0-10 10-20 4 spaces per and Boarding 1,000 GFA (1) Any use approved for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project shall be permitted by the underlying Future Land Use Plan Map designation. (2) Social/public service agencies shall not exceed five acres. Flexibility criteria: A. Alcoholic beverage sales. 1. Location: a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or public or private school unless the floor area of the use which is devoted to the display and storage of alcoholic beverages is less than ten percent of the total floor area of the use and there is no sign age lo- cated on the parcel proposed for de- Supp. No.3 CD2:55 . . S 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 2. velopment which identifies the use 3. as a location where alcoholic bever- ages are sold; c. The parcel proposed for development 4. is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or a public or private school unless the intervening land uses, 5. structures or context are such that the location of the alcoholic beverage sales is unlikely to have an adverse impact on such school or use as a place of worship; 6. d. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or will not result in a building 7. which is out of scale with existing build- ings in the immediate vicinity of the par- cel proposed for development. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved ~esign and appearance. Side and rear setback: 8. a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, 9. more efficient parking layout or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess ofthe minimum required. 3. 4. B. Comprehensive infiU redevelopment projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is other- wise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development stan- dards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; Supp. No.3 CD2:56 The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise per- mitted in the City of Clearwater; The uses or mix of uses within the com- prehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses; Suitable sites for development or redevel- opment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater; The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The design of the proposed comprehen- sive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for devel- opment and the City of Clearwater as a whole; Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; Adequate off-street parking in the imme- diate vicinity according to the shared park- ing formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- posed for development. C. Light assembly. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. . . ZONING DISTRICTS 9 2-704 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles; Supp. NO.3 CD2:56.1 . . . ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-704 b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or im- proved design and appearance and landscaping areas are in excess of the minimum required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 5. The parcel proposed for development shall have no outdoor storage of goods, materi- als and products. 6. The parcel proposed for development shall have no process carried on within the building which causes any external nega- tive impact with regard to noise, fumes, or odors. 7. The building design of the parcel pro- posed .for development shall be architec- turally compatible with the surrounding area. D. Limited vehicle service. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the mini- mum required. Side and rear setback: 3. a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles; The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- b. Supp. No.1 CD2:57 proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess ofthe minimum required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 5. Garage doors and bays shall be located perpendicular to the abutting streets. Bays shall be screened from adjacent property by landscaped walls or fences. 6. The facade ofthe building which fronts on public roads are designed with windows, cornices or other architectural features or treatments. 7. The use does not involve the overnight, outdoor storage of automobiles. 8. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. 9. The design of the parcel proposed for development is compatible with the sur- rounding area. E. Mixed use. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- . S 2-704 . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE proved design appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 4. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses ofthe property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building are used for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes. 5. The increased height results in an im- proved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required or im- proved design and appearance. F. Nightclubs. 1. Location: a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The parcel proposed for development is not located within 500 feet of a parcel of land used for a place of worship or a public or private school unless the intervening land uses, structures or context are such that the location of the nightclub is un- likely to have an adverse impact on such school or use as a place of worship; c. The use of the parcel proposed for development has frontage on an ar- terial street but will not involve di- rect access to a major arterial street; 2. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Front setback' The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. Supp. No.1 CD2:58 4. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. G. Offices. 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such sign age is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 2. 3. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. Off-street parhing: The physical character- istics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than 4. . . . ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-704 otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes. 5. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved appearance and landscaped ar- eas are in excess of the minimum re- quired. H. Off-street parking. 1. Access to and from the parking lot shall be based on the size and design of the lot and approved by the community develop- ment coordinator. 2. All outdoor lighting is so designed and located so that no light fixtures cast light directly onto adjacent land. If the parking lot is adjacent to residen- tially used or zoning property, such off- street parking spaces shall be screened by a wall or fence of at least four feet in height which is landscaped on the exter- nal side with a continuous hedge or non- deciduous vine. 3. 1. Outdoor recreation / entertainment. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. All signage is a part of a comprehensive SIgn program; 3. Sound amplification is designed and con- structed to ensure that no amplified sound can be heard to the extent that the sound is recognizable in meaning of words or the melody of music or when wind conditions are less than ten miles per hour at a instance of more than 100 feet in all directions. or when wind conditions are Supp. No.1 CD2:59 ten miles per hour or greater, at a dis- tance of more than 150 feet in all direc- tions; 4. All outdoor lighting is designed and con- structed so that no light falls directly on land other than the parcel proposed for development; 5. Off-street parking: The operational char- acter of the outdoor recreation! entertain- ment use and the location of the parcel proposed for development is such that the likely use of the property will require fewer parking spaces per land area than otherwise required or that significant por- tions of the land will be used for passive or other non-parking demand-generating pur- poses. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. J. Overnight accommodations. 7. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; . . S 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE . b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 5. Side and rear setback: 6. a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; . b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. K Problematic uses. 1. Location. a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The use is not located within 500 feet of another problematic use; 2. Design. The building in which the use is located is painted or otherwise fin- ished in materials and colors which are muted; b. There are no security bars on the outside of doors or windows which are visible from a public right-of- a. way; 3. Signs. Any signage which has a height of greater than six feet is a part of a compre- hensive sign program; Supp. No.1 CD2:60 4. The building in which the use is located is a building which is conforming to all cur- rent land development and building reg- ulations. 5.. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 6. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles. b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. L. Restaurants. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired and/or improved design and appearance; The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. b. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; , . . . ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-704 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 6. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- ing purposes; b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the num- ber of off-street parking spaces. 7. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. M. Retail sales and service. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping ar- eas in excess of the minimum re- quired or improved design and ap- pearance; Supp. No.1 CD2:61 b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from any adjacent residential prop- erty. 4. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance and land- scaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of the proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- mg purposes; b. 'Convenience retail shall not be eligi- ble for a reduction in the number of off-street parking spaces. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. N. RV parks. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. The perimeter of the RV Park is screened to a height of four feet by a landscaped wall or fence so that headlamps from automobiles in the off-street parking area can not project into adjacent properties and streets; 3. All outdoor lighting is designed and lo- cated so that light fixtures do not cast light directly on to adjacent land used for residential purposes; . . S 2-704 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 4. All waste disposal containers which serve the use are located within a landscaped enclosed structure. 5. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 6. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. O. Self storage. 1. Access doors to individual storage units are located within a building or are screened from view from adjacent prop- erty or public rights-of-way by landscaped walls or fences located no closer to the property lines of the parcel proposed for development- than five feet. 2. The parcel proposed for development does not abut land which is designated or used for residential purposes. 3. The facades of the building in which the individual storage units are located which front on public roads are designed with windows, cornices, retail sales and service uses or other architectural features or treatments. 4. Vehicular access to the parcel proposed for development shall be by way of a local or collector street. The local/collector street shall not be located more than 100 feet from an arterial street. 5. Off-street parking: The physical character- istics of the proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for non-parking demand gen- erating purposes. Supp. No.1 .. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 7. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. P. Social/public service agencies. 1. The parcel proposed for development does not abut any property designated as res- idential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The social/public service agency shall not be located within 1,500 feet of another social/public service agency. 3. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing build- ings in the immediate vicinity of the par- cel proposed for development. 4. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 5. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking layout or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. Q. Telecommunication towers. 1. No telecommunication tower is located on Clearwater Beach. 2. If the telecommunication tower is located within a scenic corridor designated by the CD2:62 '\ . . ZONING DISTRICTS City of Clearwater or a scenic noncommer- cial corridor designated by the Pinellas Planning Council, the applicant must dem- onstrate compliance with the design cri- teria in those designations. 3. The design and construction of the tele- communication tower complies with the standards in Article 3 Division 21. R. Vehicle sales / displays. 1. The gross floor area of enclosed buildings is at least 4,000 square feet; 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. The display of vehicles for sale shall be located within an enclosed building; 4. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street. 5. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 7. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or improved de- sign and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. S. Veterinary offices, grooming and boarding. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; Supp. No.1 S 2-801.1 2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment does not involve animal confine- ment facilities that are open to the out- side. 3. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 4. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess ofthe minimum required. 5. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00) CD2:63 .' . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 MYRTLE AVE. S., CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE PLEASE PRINT OWfler/Qualifier NaWtJ ''^ I CJ;-f;. ~ f) . I L i () ~~ r r~,D ~ ' c,~ L \, 't'.--N LJ'1 , Prin Name MIC;~JdrNbfJ_yv( M'J~1U2- A-\f~. ~ntLWber Street Name Print City Business Name: IrS _T'tou' Print Name Business Address: ..5~rJ!M'~ Print S reet Number Date ot Birth /1 /a. ~(Y . y-y M u:~N A-e L r::'( State .c~NLI\f(J& T ''$ ~/7J':r- Zip Street Name Suite/Apt, State Zip Business Pt').01'9:,' '-f, ';? J _ Da, fe of Business O,.p,eningL -:2 C ff) (' -I ~ '7 !:tiLL q I v if j"'"J.-.l t:) &/ 'C.i fF! S['- CY AreaCode ~7ioo 'fH f( A-~th/~V{Le. ac~ Print City ownt{ t:rnQ:'13 & Area Code Number Individu~ Partnership 0 Corporation 0 (list officers and titles) Certification # (if required): I certify that the Information given In this application Is complete and accurate. and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this application, may result In denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a license. I agree to operate within city and state laws. and to notify the City licensing division if any of the information I have given chan~es. I also certify I am th, e bUSine~gal agent., '__/ d) / ~ /iitfJI;$J!L 1mJU(J6 VUL~ 5)t~frT/ ~ ELL Signature and Title Print Name Date FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Category II b G)f:l. DC:fC) Fee Date 155. Amt. Paid e;"ja ~&.fll)" of< $eJZ.\J'~ a:- ~Qu.~"\ -~ "€.~t (.,L.~5 1"-1l.1-' 'Tr'E.u O~ TJhs S I"T'E. . Brian J. Aungst. Mayor-Commissioner J.B. Johnson, Vice Mayor-Commissioner Bob Clark, Commissioner ~... u"""... ""l"'t.r,,'u.l"\ie-~i^"",Qr F n;:tvirt .....AmAri~k Commissioner CLEARWATER ~>f~rs__M" Total: t:/.S-O Owner Group D......\I 11') oa . CITY OF CLEAR DEVELOPMENT S Municipal Services Buildi 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clea PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX APPLICATION FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE Please Print or Type Owner/Qualifier ~e: 'I E3D .A-.~ 6 LAt Uf!Jtsr ''t ~ /f;-t! Street Name State / D~e of r;rthiJ tf 1 Suite or Apt # Zip Code ~VU,tG~ML- Complete Company Name 6'.t2-JttUt{{)IiS r/ (fr~~cA'JIi,>If&JIf;$::~litltfJ#,e Business AddresA) !eb'19 t Street ~mL City - -- " Owner Hom~one: '1 J ~ J~-Z If{.. 61' Area ode umber Business Phone: .s~_ Area code Number Individual Partnershio n Certification number (if recuired): Date of Business Opening: I certify that the information given in . application is complete and accura an I u derstand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this . application may result in denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a nse, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the City licensing division if any of the information I ave given hanges. I also certify I am the business owner or owner's legal agent. ;a,Mi18 frl ~ ' TP-19't/Ad ~j eMLNJJMT J'-: D..-1-tf21 Signature and Title Print Name Date FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Category # Fee Approval Yes No Date Inspector Zoning ./ Traffic Engineering Building Police Fire Health Harbormaster Fic.lCorp. Other ) ./ .f NcuJ-c:, P~. SlForms 7 -99/0ccupalional License App Date Issued Amt. Paid !If: /.;) '/0.,1 2.00 ~.(!)C) Total cA r .- Owner Group ui If U \YJ ~-~-~ \ ;~~L~;~~:~:!c~~ '~ I \l Municipal Services Building, 2nd floor I " MAY 25 2001 1\ 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 1~'~'ilfjm,i~~\P (\~'1Itli~~s1::~:: ~;~ ~::~::TI::~:~:~:6::576 Please PrinlofTVpe ~SS \-\ 'fY\. \2~\C~ LLC..- OwneriQualifier Name: / /"" J A _~~ r/J / .-tJ... Date of Birth: -c:ft;::;L](;' 8 {ASS I 0' L~-.S /"rl11H6-, {{tv Mailing address: I7"C/~ S~umber ,"JJL ;r A- /Yl tJ--v City /I ~. /'r/; /r/Eg/24sRk 4l-E Street Name Pi.- State Suite or Apt # 3.=16 /~ Zip Code Business Name: j! //VJ /:# / r "A-/ 6~:55 .lV7/ICI(/f~ Complete Company Name LLC_ Business Address: /O,5CJ Street Ny'~ej /J -r:r---../.? Cg~<.-'WIO /~r- City Owner Home Phone: /1/. ,/l?Y$r~ AP(i. Stfeet Name ?"L State _/ Busin~ Phone: /d.7 0 7- /~o / Area code Number Area Code Number Suite or Apt # 3J?JT Zip Code Date qI Business Opening: t/S/ 30 /cp J Month/DaylY ear Des':!Ption of Busin,ss (please include number of and type of machines, the address and business n~me ~f m~chine(s) location): , A!t.{/'b 14--.% :/Ue9/J"1~ U;oycIC O<J/!/e ~;:;,c ;a 'E#1/.J:-8S - ,,(./0 W;@tClc DottiE &A.J S'/7t."; -",VO Ot-ff-Dot?1{ ..sT~...AfG - OFPIc.eU~[ O/l./~ Individual n Partnershio n Corooration ~ Please list officers and titles: ,/C Y LF # j t - Miff _ -&r , /J--?7)./ fA/..D.s. Certification number lif reauired): I certify that the information given in this application is complete and accurate, and I understand that to make false or fraudulent statements within this ,application may result in denial of license and possible legal action. If granted a license, I agree to operate within the city and state laws, and to notify the ~licen~ng ~ivision if any of the information I have given changes. I also certify I am the business owner or owner's lega~a.~~------------- \ -1(~ (ju/jA ~11.-A~ iG~ eff~ 5:r .' / DS-~.1 ~ - p ( / Sign ure and Title Print Name \ - Date.--/ S FOR CITY USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE "-----.------ 9 Approval " ,~e:~I1Qinee~~ Building Police Fire Health Harbormaster ~~ ~ fIr:? fIJ S1Forms 7 -99/0ccupalionallicense App Category # Fee O"$g' , d.-'B'O 60- 15-0 . Date Issued Amt. Paid :-so.r I&-yt-J-,i ce'-;.fS~ t'&. 5\~\o , Total ~ ~ \,\,,\~~~.2 Owner Group ~ I ~ ~ ~ G "" ~ 11 1207 9 1208 10 1206 l'?os8 FA ~.II/ 1. 120~7 18 120a 7 7 I,?OS, 1'?01 1 hI ft:. / 6 ~ ~ ',2 19 21 'T.I li Jm f ~ ~ ... to ~ ~32S2~J I, ~ BlUFF -----. 1201 j" 'I ~~ F109 8 ~ 6 155 1107 [i];;;:.J ! ~\ I lr~ ~:; 1_ 5 ~ ~ '~""P. ~ I ~ "- f bs ~13tO ~14 L\Ji J{ ~17!8 f106 ~ ~ ~~'\ "~a 1~ AfiJ 1107 L~~2 ~~ lb I'~ 1~ u 2b 18 17 23 ~ II:' ~ 2; ~'I 1~~1~~30 ~.I G2i1~ ~~' i, ~ ~ ~ g ~ 101"(jJ; LL (t15 ~ 16 IDIIf. ~ '\. .. )11 26 Ci:::J 0 1~~8 / ~9 7.Ff*-' 60 It 13~\14 ~ I~ 2 1521 ~-I )9 25 ) \ rB 1008/ i! to~ ~o.o 1010 II 00 ' 130 q, ~ 03 <'I S 2<<8 1~...1i ..1. ~ 'J 100~ ct'; c.' f9.pf(\} , 0./ ~ &CJ IOO8/Jrt ~::l i a i ?f "= CQ;;->' ~ 24 j/ 0 -.....:7: y..~, I::' iiiiiiii ~ :::s:: JURGENS~ 29 ~ 36 ,,^_, ~ "'8 ~8 ~ l:> ....., 10111 t(J11, k l:f 237 3 1007 ' tQ07\ ~ :t!1iiiii.... ~ q)i3 q)::l :\~1i 1:::: *1~'2 C 7 t ~ )5 11 ,,/1 = 10071\.VtJ If :/ ~ 7 iffiji --I 2 / 31 1027 ho~ 1r;.3/ III ~ <Q010 3 J~~J .:t f 008 1~' i5 ~r-I 17/32U / Vii ..,.,~ // /,= 0 ~ M~ ~,il~ ~1r,~ , I 10&' 3 44 /~ IS I IF~~4 Y '~ ~ ~~ 10~.2 11 =+=~I \ ~[&EET 8/) / 0 ~' \: ~ (EJ . ~7f) , <0 . 4. 17i1" 10 ~. 6 q)91~~ /10/91 ~6 1 ~jl10 ~ _~~_ I ,13 B 7 8 ~ 9 100( ~li5 ~ ~ijj ~ ...' [... . . ~~ T3 ... ~4,~" .. ~~~,~ ~~ 1~i'; .~20 g ~! 1'8 90 907 3 ~;J 110 g ~ ~ 9'Z 1~11 ~ 908 909 19 I '~ L_ L 04~ I:; !MARG'O ~ ~,-L- 1~ 12: ~ ~ ./905 41 0 ,^" ~ u 3 906 907 18 I 904 "di' 903 I I 7 _ 1- .., I 0> -- I I 13g =o~ /... t~{/6 q)1If1 /4 ri; Y 1 w 9!) 4 904 ::: 17 :;. g / g STRFET~jl~ 110 .c. ~:::> 8 5 902 16 14 11 i;;;t 50 , .., J to.. : 90., ~ ~ ~ ~I 9 ~ 901 7 6 900 901 1 5 :tfff .' ....'0 I ~61'.et,? ~ (i: 8 '=>621.210 5" l.eta-1 ".' 1211 _01. 63 l 9 1_ I,?O 1'?09 10 14-' ~~2,B ~., l. ", ;;... '-1Ta <:J C 29 \1 ' 32 :i? 810~ '1..11I '. 1200 S' ~ I I .~ ~f;'51~- -/'2092 !!.I I "207 3/~ ~ /1206 4 \-:/ 13 ~ '12 1.et0 120 3 i' 36 35 34 33 03 5 1.zo~ 27 (f) o q) 12 1212 ~ ~~ :g Ol Ol 0> 11. ,..3 1~ ~ll~. 9 1206 ~I~ - 8 1204 ~ 16~ 15 14 7 1202 0:: 0 <'I ... 000 33 Ol 0> 0> - It) t-- o to. q) i LA SJ Ol _ 2 Q; It) o 0> 4 2 3 I- g p~ ~7 q)1 1'" 0 g ~~ <0 <:> Ol to C 0) ,t From: Planning Department - A-~ KL{S~<<'_ Planner Requesting Maps FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT MAP REQUEST Please prepare the following maps: 1. Color Aerial Photograph with the property outlined and streets marked. 2. Location Map 3. Flexible Development Request Map 4. Existing Surrounding Uses Map Requested on: ~~/4109. 3/5)D ~ For Completion by: Survey Attached: 0 Legal Description Attached: 0 Comments: OWNER: lIJ -I If( 1'. ("'"...... SITE: {o'70 f\(1I~ CASE:APP Z 0 J I CJ - (-Of PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES:) O. I ',.. PIN' I .Of t.q If. 2ffYZ. "fJJ/,*,t ATLAS PAGE: 'U~ 1} . . Text for surrounding land use maps for CDB cases Revised 1/12/01 Use correct spelling Do not abbreviate Choose from the following land use terms: o Community residential home o Adult use o Airport o Assisted living facility o Auto service station o Cemeteries o Congregate care o Convention center o Educational facility (e.g. junior college, technical school) o Governmental use o Halfway house o Hospital o Indoor recreation/entertainment o Light assembly o Manufacturing o Marina o Medical clinic o Mobile home park ~ Multi- family residential o Nightclub o Nursing home o Office o Open space o Outdoor recreation/entertainment o Overnight accommodation o Park o Parking garage o yarking lot 'I> Place of worship o Problematic use \\MS2\PDS\Planning Department\C D Bvnaps\Textfor surrounding land use maps for CDB cases,doc . o Public transportation facility o Research/technology use o Residential shelter o Restaurant ~Retail o RV park o Salvage yard o School o $elf storage ~Single- family residential o Social/community center o Social/public service agency o Telecommunications tower o TV/radio studio o Utility/infrastructure facility o Vehicle sale/display o Vehicle service o Veterinary office o Wholesale/warehouse