CSP01-01-01
------ ~ ~ .............~...,
.APPLICATION FOR SIIPLAN APPROVAL
ANNING & DEVELOP:MENT S . VICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUill MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
~::"' ,""mffi,d for ~, 'ppli,"'o", for "''',rn;,' ",os, ""''''Y ""', 00"''''',"",[ ",os, "~",os,
Signs, vested rights, development agreements, seawalls, docks, marinas and other marine structures and home occupations.
MAILING ADDRESS
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT NAME: ?~I) ~()p... 7~Al
: /f~1 .:5: tlu/Ft/i(;4/' t$Lt/o,t!LG'ARUH~~ FL.
:Z:274Lf7-3/f'6 ~ FAX NUMBER :7~7-tf'i~-7/~ ?
/I?~
-
PHONE NUMBER
(List all owners)
PROPERTY OWNERS
AGENT NAME
MAILING ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
FAX NUMBER :
---
B --=:::
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
--
~,J/ 5~/PV'lre~ /1t-v'/..) , t'&.sn;eW'~~ JJ7~?
I ,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~rpC~a ~
PARCEL NUMBER, tP 7~ ..z 2-/.1" - .s..! 3.8(2 -.0""<9 - e> 7 ~ 0 > ~"";>" # Act L 9'f'1- tflSi A
73 /f~ ~40/e/ / .
STREET ADDRESS:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
SIZE OF SITE:
~ ~ 2 ~CA1e-s
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: A //a,I'/9al ~ $$ /~..- A f" f? t);, ..z.~ A?A/ h .Ko,4,O
. / q.. ,
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES NO ~
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all
representations made in this application
are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
day of
to me and/or
who is persona
as
~
~
~
C)
......
~
--....
FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY:
LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING:
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS NORTH:
K.,!'\- K Mialer
~CNl:!;""~~!;)r. ;il CO 853913
. l::J!~ '^:'~. 26,2003
'.P-t~~....a '!'kl"U
""'.' ''"-,..
SOUTH:
FUTURE DESIGNATION:
EAST
WEST:
FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS NORTH:
SOUTH:
EAST:
WEST
S: application forms/development review/basic application doc
r~
Receipt No:
D!;te:
Line Items:
Case No
CSP 01-01-01
1199825823
1/4/2001
Tran Code
Payments:
Method
Check
Payer
CANTERBURY
Description
Comprehensive Sign Program
Revenue Account No.
010-341262
Bank No Acct Check No
2140
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID:
,~~~ .,~.
Amount Due
$300.00
Amount Paid
$300.00
$300.00
{"1'f'V
'r
CLEAhoNA TE:R
J"'~'}'
PIN. bit fl
'j
,I,
CUlVf~F: 300. OD
TDTL 3DOlfCD
LHC~{ 300 If DO
NQ3940 10=37 B
AJ.i'.l:flJJA V IT TU AlJTtlU.K1Z.E AliEN'!'
PA~G & DEVELOPMENT SERa:;ES ADMINISTRATION
MUlIrCIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOU"'-MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
C##ie-KBlRY hq/eilT7 ;PIt",:I ;t.~.
(Name off all property owners)
~Q)~)
1, That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION: ~/ 5'.. <9u1'~/t"~ tSLv- ~ (!Lb/Jz!'0q,~
PL. 3'$767
II~\ IT'~ (;:~"'["--'J.'f'\i:; I-~;-'F--~-
, ~ I r l L'l l c' I \} [" [ [I
I i rl~ .00 -- .J' ~ LC~ III
lUll JAN 4 2000 ~i
2. That this property constitutes the property for which aLequest for a:
~
tfi1 ./?1' ~/A/' .A::'~
y
(Nature of request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint ~mN ~ ~~
as (hisJtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4, That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5. That (lIwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this .3 day of
U. . A.D~ / to d/or
-e.- 0 is personal
SIGNED (Property Owner)
SIGNED (Property Owner)
~ ~/=~-tJ
Notary public, . G)' K th .
.,,.,,J(}y corryni~e.ion expires:.. l'" ~l{' Mlttler
":Ji..(!." ';".d ,.",..,,:,,' :. . ",00853913
i~/"'!ii"r~mrj_!J ~"1:""::;3 ~"A\... .' !7JI""".Aili.26,.2003
:" '. Iqibw & ~-'-.:::."~3' ~'!/!9< \ '," "-:.,)..d ThI''.1
'So,. . ~%","A, ~ f"r'.,,':". '..:i Tn!".
"" ~ '~,Ine,
. CITYOFCWARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM REQum.E:MENTS
K'eLJ ~t)r p~
ADDRESS: 4.,2/ ~ ~t//e~ :?tt/~l e t.B9..e/./f9~ th. 5.5 7~ 7
The intent of the Comprehensive Sign Program is to provide private property owners and businesses with
flexibility to develop innovative, creative and effective signage and to improve the aesthetics of the City of
Clearwater. Signage which is proposed as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program may deviate from the
minimum sign standards in terms of numbers of signs per business or parcel of land, maximum area of sign
face per parcel of land and the total area of sign faces per business or parcel, subject to compliance with the
following Flexibility Criteria. The use of site plans, sections/elevations, renderings an , U-W~-'WflYrCJI-=:-1
necessary as supplementary infonnation in addition to the infonnation provided on thi i~ ~~~: ~ ~O~: Il~
1. Architectural Theme. Uu ~
NAME:
a. The signs proposed in a Comprehensive Sign Program shall be designed as a part
. of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development and shall be
constructed of materials and colors which reflect an integrated architectural vocabulary for the parcel
proposed for development.
y~. - ~/"'S" h/~w- devJ~ r~~.Jy.
?
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the signs proposed in the Comprehensive Sign Program
shall be demonstrably more attractive than signs otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for
development under the minimum sign standards.
2.
JC
/~
Height. The maximum height of all signs proposed in a Comprehensive Sign Program is twelve ~feet
provided, however, that a single attached sign with a sign face of no more than twelve (12) squa"re feet may be
erected up to the height of the principal building.
165.
.
.
3.
Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Sign Program is automatically controlled so
thalthe~0;4;~<#~clO;% 1~~~~
!~, F" ('lr';'-"r~;'\;r7 i'~i'~
1'.1.' '. ~ , I r ", .
.: \ I L I._;,}") "~ \ j \~ t~::i i 11 ,;
~! :) ! L'..J -.' '-" ,.. !I : I i ~
, . . i.' i ~.,
t....~. ',' ". "1 . ,
. . ZOOO : ii !~
li:l! JAN 4 .L' ~)l.
!LJ u ;
! I
(~X_~.:::::::~=--==::.I
4. Total Area of Sign Faces. The total area of sign faces which are proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Sign
Program shall not exceed two (2) times the total area of sign faces permitted under the minimum sign standards
on the parcel proposed for development.
M MIl' /t& r er:e.eu:( ~ p; *"",5 -1,;../ cI.--
.
.
5. Community Character. The signage proposed in the Comprehensive Sign Program shall not have an adverse
impact on the community character of the City of Clearwater.
A/P : /7' /5 & Sk~~4' ~-se
#eh1~. S>''7'~.
, ,/
6. Property Values. The signage proposed in the Comprehensive Sign Program will not have an adverse impact on
the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
ft6 /y U/~Y/ AS; Y:
12A,-1,'/?7e5 ///b'/~"
~ ,. .
/ r- 4h// /7tPr obdz~~
I r.s 1-':1
i ~) U:, i 'I
I nO) If,;
[JU JAN 4 2000 : )1
Ljl
t B Y~-==:;;;;:;,:::::;;:;;;::-.~----;;:- d
7. Elimination of Unattractive Signage. The signage proposed in a Comprehensive Sign Program will result in the
elimination of existing unattractive signage or will result in an improvement to the appearance of the parcel
proposed for development in comparison to signs otherwise permitted under the minimum sign standards.
YES ./ ~ A'4de .~/ce... d,w;; c:;;/L; ~~ce
4~/4/;:;::~~~~J/ ~
(
.
.
8. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The signage proposed in the Comprehensive Sign Program is consistent
with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the
are in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
Ye:5.
,
.--.-"- I:~T~I d
L::J II, !,
,I! i,
JAN L1 /000 ':1 g
J'iJ L_j I
I
By_________ ::,~_,::.:.:..:;,;;d
Please return check list for review and verification.
Date:jk-. </L
t
(signature of applicant)
; .......I}}~iiiii;i;:;llii i.!."'!>....: rw..ter
:."i.> ..\~<C' at
.
o
FEE SCHEDULE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
Effective Date: October 20, 2000
L Applications for Level One Development Approval
(a) Standard Development... ... ... ... . .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
(b) Flexible Standard Development - Multi-family and
commercial. .. .. . ... . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. ... ... . . . .. . . .. ... ... .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .
(c) Flexible Standard Development - Single-family and two-family
(d) Flexible Standard Development - Accessory uses/structures
for single-family and two-family properties... ............ ..........
(e) Continuances of a Development Review Committee (DRC)
meeting ...... ... . .. .. . ... .. . .. . ... ... . . . . .. ... . . . '" . . . . .. . .. . .. ... ... . . "
n. Applications for Level Two Development Approval
No fee
475.00
100.00
50.00
75.00
(a) Flexible Development - Single-family and two-family............ 200.00
(b) Flexible Development - Multi-family and commercial............ 1,205.00
(c) Preliminary Plat............ ... ............... ..................... ..... 600.00
(d) Transfer of Development Rights (no additional charge if
Submitted with Flexible Development application) ............... 1,205.00
(e) Appeals to the Community Development Board - Residential .... 100.00
(1) Appeals to the Community Development Board-
Non-residential ...........................................................
Appeals to a Hearing Officer ... . . . ... ... '" . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . .. " .
Continuances of CDB meeting/public hearing......................
(g)
(g)
III.
Applications for Level Three Development Approval
(a) Annexation (includes land use map amendment and rezoning to
categories compatible with County designations) ................
(b) Land use map amendment ..........................................
(c) Zoning amendment (only) ........................... ... ...... .......
(d) Continuances of a DRC, CDB or City Commission meeting/
Public hearing .........................................................
(e) Development Agreement (includes DR! and NOPC) ............
(1) Final Plat ......... . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. ... .. ..
(g) Vested Rights ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . .. . .. .. . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . .....
IV. Other
(a) Administrative lot division (minor lot adjustment) ...............
(b) Zoning verification letter ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . " . .. . .. '" . . .
(c) Zoning interpretation letter ... . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
s: application forms/development reviewlcomml/nity development code fee schedllle.doc - edited October 23. 2000
250.00
500.00
75.00
No fee
885.00
775.00
75.00
500.00
300.00
500.00
150.00
25.00
50.00
_.~._~\
I-~"- - - I ~
I c' - "'.-' 0 \ I
I L-=--=--=-----~ ~
t ~
c:::> j
c:::> , j
, c:::> \ .
C'-...J 1
~ \1
11
I',
I
\'
z
<::I:
J
"
.
.
CURVE RRO 1 US ARC CHORD DELTA
------ -----.- -------- ---------
1 567.00 325.00 320.57 32850'29.
2 667.00 117 . 64 117 . 49 10-06'19"
3 777.00 170.00 169.66 12-32'09"
4 667. 00 60.49 60.47 05-11'46"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 75 LESS NORTH 10 FEET THE~Of AND 8LL Of LOTS 76, RHO 77,
THAT PART Of LOT 123 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION,
DESCRIBED AS fOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of LOT
123, AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG ITS EASTERLY BOUNDARY 25 fEET,
THENCE WESTERLY IN R STRAIGHT LINE TO R POINT IN THE ~ESTERLY
BOUNDARY Of SAID LOT WHICH IS MIDWRY BETWEEN.. ITS NORTHVEST ~O
~ou l'HVEST _. CO~PO' l t'iENCt: SOli tHCi<<. f t1LuN& TnE- ~VE:S-t'r..f\~
Of SAID LOT; 2S FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
SRIO LOT, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY Of SAID LOT.
TO'THE POINT Of BEGINNING, LOTS 124, 125, 126. 127, 128, AND 129
RCCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOf RS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE
12 AND 13, Of THE PUBLIC RECORDS Of PlNELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDR.
LESS T~T PART OF LOT 127 BEG t NN 1 NG AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of
SAID LOT RND RUNNING EASTERLY 3 FEET AlONG NORTH BOUNDARY, THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Of SRID
LOT, THENCE NORTH ALONG WESTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE POINT Of
BEGINNING.
-
r;:-:::~:'::-':-":_~:~-"~~'~'
'i-> : \
. g \\
~ \\
\\
\ ~ \\
\ --.---\ ~.\
\r~_~-=~~~-'Cfl.
BOUNDRRY SURVEY
NOTE I 5ZIl'VEY !U1ECT TO R SERRDI FtIf ER!JE1I/ENTS IN) Ith " Iff.U1fD
7fTlHCRTrt M suwcy ~rED IfE1IE1IIIllIID Ifffr THE /flNllUf I:-~ 111. cur::,r,.lrll ". I OC'Vl ":=/Q'a."c.-
llUilfDfOlT IT CH1P'/Vt 11 ",.., FlOltlDR IDfIN1Sf'MfHf ClIlf IWlJ ~~". ......~ Ill;. -' ,Y;J
Pf .. NO OICIff.lROI<<NTS oaJ'T fG!IOM HDff~. RIIJ R5!ilCIRTE5, IlCtJIIroRIITED --
~.4~ UIIJ SUM1IJtS l.JWJ 1'f..RIItE1t5
~/,//A !211 U.S. II.T_ " N. 5V17f B
.. ~ R. Slfil' ~ I'IIf NO. 151.1 I'ff.Jf ~'lJ lI2It, FLlItlDR .. .D5ID
.lIDr IIIIl.lD 1M"" _.-0 IUrH ""'.J I'HDNEI 1IN-54.
REPf1REOFORI
~ ~SSOC. LlKITEC. BARNeTT SANKS Of PlNElLRS CCONry ~
Pf'wJ1:, t 1
MNOI
~EAN SANDS KOTEl
R704eOW461
3 - 18 .. 87
.... " ,
M nopt;h
ameplcan
signs 800-348-5000
.
.
r ."
....
r../
1 Remove existing
..... I ~.. New top filler painted to
...............~.... match cabinet (if reqd.)
7'-0/1
Black background
c()
.......
lD
."'~ ""0' I ....~... ~
I' .;' ' .
.'., ".. 'f...~'
ft.
, ':. I "': ",'
J1l0".1
tR" '-1
,:I:IJ~; I
~ :."~. -..:~.~ I
,.____._. I
____White copy wi
black outline
..--
..--
I
t--..
Red
b
I
b
..--
____________Remove old pole cover and
install new 12"x 24" pole
cover (no reveal)
24"
<
Pole +0 be cu;t ~"
\I
New Faces for Existing Sign
. Plex faces decorated second surface
. double face illuminated sign
· illuminated wi fluorescent lamps
Customer RED ROOF INN
Salesman Scott SMITH
Clearwater, FL
MS4038
Account Manager Sue G.
rc:=-= ..J ~
\ ~ c::>
I, c::>
\~ ~
\~ ~
~~ i
~ J
~ &-
ct'.
Date Jan. 5, 2000
Artfst MDS
~I~
l'-J(Y
-~-
1 4' -a"'
1 0' ..(1
J~--
CLEl~.RWATER~ FL
t- 5'-6. -i
SIGN FRAME
. 1 W x 1 'ho J( 3;16" Vl8DED ANGlE IRON fRNv1E
. 5.'DOlE tw<<:>lM1NG FOR CENTER PIPE
REO ROOf CAINt
. .050 ~..HNISHID SA.ON BlAC:KAU..Mf'lJM WI 24"
FilER \MOTH
. IU.lMNA1ED WI SIX (6; 96" VEROCH. LAMPS WI lVtQ
(2} 8AI.lAS1S a ONE (1) 12CN I :2IlAMP ClRClIT
. BOTIOM R/lCFWAY TO BE A ~ OF '" OFF
8OTf()t.4 fiLl[-Q
. lA\tPS 10 HAVE RLMER ORP SHElDS
. MO (2} ~ HOlES IM:W FOOl fIj BO~
FilER 8. rw::s!NAV
. U FlLER & S1RIP ARe ONE PIECE
. CAllJ( MQLMN; KllES (SCREWS) IN FlLER
. USE lAMP SCOCETS WI GASKElS & Pf1CH FUED ENDS
. MO (2) W MCDIItG Ha.ES WI NIlS WELDED IN
PlACE FOR ACf(-lJl5
. 3/16" lHICK MAITE ClEM saAR GRADE LEXAN fACES
. EON) ~ACE 'MIlE CCPfW/3I8" BI}O( 0Ut1.N
. PMlElS INCLJ.()E TOP H.tf\lGING BAR
.'
rrO f
roo
Inn
6 5/8" 0.0.
INSERl PFE
PAlMED WHnE
INSK1ATION NOTE: SIGN Sl-<<)U.D PLWAVS BE
INSWlED W/lK SHORT SI)f FACING THE ~..
LONG SIVf: FACES tHE SlRfEI
1; l II". 'I r,
--+
: 2Cr x 24"
. POlE COVER-
4' -0"
I
.
.
......-.--,
,---- > ~
i\'~~
I I'i
IiI
J AN 4: ZOOO 1,\ :\
\'L~=~=~;
. - - -
.
.
'f' _. ~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
(727) 562-4567
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION
"'0
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY PROPOSED SIGN SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE, DRAWN TO SCALE AND INCLUDE THE ~
FOLLOWING: ~
=l
(a) Site Plan.
(b) Dimensions and elevations (including the message) of the sign.
(c) Lot frontage on all street rights-of-way.
(d) Maximum and minimum height of the sign, as measured from finished grade.
(e) Location of the sign In relation to property lines, public rights-of-way, easements, buildings, and other signs on the property.
(Pole signs must be a minimum of 5 feet from property line.)
(f) Dimensions of the sign's supporting members.
(g) For illuminated signs, the type. placement. Intensity and hours of illumination. (Not more than five (5) footcandles of light
Intensity for commercial signs.)
(h) Construction and electrical specifications. for the purpose of enabling determination that the sign meets all applicable
structural and electrical requirements of the Building and National Electric Codes. (indicate If UL rated.)
(I) Inventory of all existing signs on the same property and/or building on which the sign is to be located. indicating the number,
type, use e.g. property Identification. business Identification, etc.) location and surface area. (if ~none: so indicate.)
. All applications for signs shall inciude detail drawings showing how the sign Is to be constructed and secured. All signs greater
than 32 square feet in size shall have structural drawing signed and sealed by licensed Florida engineer or architect.
ALSO, please note that wind load requirements should conform to the 1991 edition of the Southern Standard Building Code.
S. GuJFV;:eLJ8lVJ
PROJECT ADDRESS
Lj&l
)>
"'0
"'0
r-
z
o
LOT
BLOCK/TRACT
SUBDIVISION
PARCEL NUMBER / /
OWNER~~~IN
ADDRESS 4, Zri S. ~ II- V)"eC-..J A ~
/ / /
TELEPHONE L{ €f7-:5 L/IJ t./
CITY Q l-e LY\. Yof/'<;"-- STATE P I ZIP 33 7 ~ 7
LESSEE (OF PROPERTY OR BUILDING)
BUSINESS NAME_Red- ~~ "N
ADDRESS Cf <-.-1 S. C-- It II--- IV 1 'ew B 1 ~
ADDRESS
CITY lAr~
TELEPHONE
STATUS: DATE:
APPROVED D
DENIED D
TELEPHONE
STATE f l ZIP 33771
CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE
DESIGN REQUIRED D
REVIEW NOT-APPLlCABLED
BOARD
CONTRACTOR
5l'fj~ ti J)e..-'51.?J"
? ~&()(Alll1emcslL RJ. #7., r-
DISTRICT: URBAN CENTER D
CLRWTR. BEACH D
N. GREENWOOD D
LA... <;4
STATE NO.
CLEARWATER LICENSE NO.
TYPE OF SIGN: _ POLE - PROJECTING
SURFACE AREA IN SQ. FT.
2/J
VALUE OF SIGN
- WINDOW _ CANOPY, AWNING OR MARQUEE
_ PORTABLE _ OTHER YY1 on ume.1 6 S)fr
1,; uMJ ,.J ELECTRICAL PERMIT NEEDED? V
_ WALL _ GROUND
FOR SIGNS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY EASEMENT ALONG US 19, ESTIMATED REMOVAL COST
.
.
Statement of Authorization - Any application form which Is signed by an individual other than the property owner shall be
accompanied by a notarized statement of authorization consenting to the sign placement or. if the property or building upon
which the sign Is to be located Is leased, a copy of the executed lease shall accompany the application form. In the event the
building or property Is leased and the application form is signed by an Individual other than the lessor, the application shall be
accompanied by a notarized statement of authorization signed by the lessor consenting to the sign placement and a copy of
the executed lease. (Not required for portable signs/face changes or signs approved by variances.)
~ ..
,
~
CERTIFICATION
I certify that all Information submitted on this application and attachments thereto are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief. I understand that any Inaccurate Information may result in revocation of the sign permit and removal
of any sign erected pursuant to such permit. I will be responsible for the installation of the subject sign in accordance with the
sign regulations of the City of Clearwater.
I acknowledge that all nonconforming signs are subject to the amortization provisions contained in Section 44.55 of the City of
Clearwater Code of Ordinances and must be brought into compliance before October 13. 1992. Furthermore. I understand that
any Investment made In or to a nonconforming sign during the amortization period, including but not limited to message
changes, shall not constitute grounds for noncompliance or compliance later than October 13. 1992.
t3eh~~
Print Property Owner (or representative) Name
Property Owner's Signature (or authorized representative)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
Atlas Page
Zoning
Slgnage Permitted
Zoning Approval
Date
Traffic Eng. Approval
Building Approval
~Clearwater
-~
lJ~
One City. One Future.
Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner
Ed Hooper, Vice Mayor-Commissioner Bob Clark, Commissioner
J.B. Johnson, Jr., Commissioner Karen Seel, Commissioner
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR ALL
SIGN APPLICATIONS
All SIGN APPLICATIONS SHAll BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOllOWING
INFORMA TION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WHERE THE SIGN IS PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED.
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF:
The owner of the property.
The lessor, if applicable.
The sign erector.
A NOTARIZED STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION SIGNED BY THE LESSOR CONSENTING TO THE
SIGN PLACEMENT.
SITE PLAN SHOWING:
Lot frontage on all street rights-of-way.
Location of the proposed sign in relation to:
Property lines;
Easements;
Existing and proposed buildings;
Other signs on the property;
Access drives.
ELEVATION DRAWING SHOWING:
Dimensions of the proposed sign;
Surface area of the proposed sign;
Maximum and minimum height of the proposed sign;
Dimension s of the sign's supporting structures;
Wording and/or message of the proposed sign;
Colors of the proposed sign.
THE TYPE OF PROPOSED SIGN.
VALUE OF THE PROPOSED SIGN.
CONSTRUCTION AND ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS.
FOR ILLUMINATED SIGNS INCLUDE:
The type of illumination;
Placement of illumination;
Intensity of illumination.
INVENTORY OF ALL EXISTING SIGNS INDICATING THE NUMBER, TYPE, LOCATION AND SQUARE
FOOTAGE OF EACH SIGN.
...
r'>
.......
\..5
~
~
...
~
:j-
<<
.
.
.
LL
o
>-
f--
FAX
u
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
TO: Martin R. Cole FAX: 727-446-7169
TELEPHONE: 727-447-3464
FROM: Ryan Givens TELEPHONE: 727-562-4504
SUBJECT: Letter of Understanding
DATE: January 23, 2001 NUMBER OF PAGES
INCLUDING COVER:
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
January 22,2001
Mr. Martin R. Cole
421 South Gulfview Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida 33767
RE: Letter of Understanding regarding signage at 421 South Gulfview
Dear Mr. Cole:
The purpose of this letter is to clarify the conditions under which the City will review
signage for the site at 421 South Gulfview Boulevard. The site is zoned T, Tourist
District. The Code allows one (1) freestanding monument sign for each parcel in this
zoning district. The area of the monument sign shall not exceed:
1. One square foot per two linear feet of street frontage;
11. One square foot per 100 square feet of building fa~ade facing street frontage; or
111. Twenty (20) square feet, whichever is less. However a minimum of ten square feet
per parcel proposed for development shall be allowed.
After applying the formula, staff has determined that the site is entitled to one, 20 square
foot monument sign. Staff previously misinterpreted the Code to allow two signs due to a
definition for corner lot misprint in the Community Development Code. I apologize for
the misinformation; however, the site is entitled to only one, 20 square foot monument
SIgn.
You are invited to apply for a Comprehensive Sign Program that would allow you to
double the allowable sign square footage and increase the number of monument signs to
two. As part of this application, all existing signage is required to be brought into
compliance. Keep in mind the Code restricts the height of all monument signs to four
feet.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
J.B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, COMMISSIONER
*
BOB ClARK, CmlMISSIOI'\ER
ED HOOPER, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
Cole, Page 2
421 South Gulfview Boulevard - Letter of Understanding
January 19, 2001
It is also important that I bring to your attention that the site was approved for a
Termination of Status of Nonconformity as part of application V AR 1999-F201 (Refer to
attached staff report). As a condition of approval, all nonconforming signs are required to
be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with the Code. The existing 55.3
square foot pole sign needs to be removed as result.
I thank you for your patience and understanding in this matter. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4561 or Ryan Givens, Planner at 727-562-
4504.
UL
Attachments as noted
\\MS2\PDS\Planning Department\C D B\Comp Sign Prog\Gulfview 421 Red Roof Inn\Gulfview 421 Letter of understanding. doc
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: August 17, 1999
Agenda Item: III B.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Aegean Associates, Ltd.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Harry S. Cline, Esq., MacFarlane, Ferguson & McMullen, Attorneys
at Law
LOCATION:
421 Gulfview Blvd.
REQUEST:
Termination of the status of nonconformity.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plans, section/elevations and landscape plans prepared by Robert
Resch of Graham Design Associates.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1. 21 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Two Hotels and a laundromat
Hotel
PLAN CATEGORY:
Resort Facilities High
ZONING DISTRICT:
Tourist District
ADJACENT LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial retail
Restaurant
Hotels and motels
Public parking lot and Gulf of Mexico
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY:
The property is located across the street from the Beach. The
immediate vicinity is devoted to tourist uses.
Page 1
.
.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to redevelop three parcels of land in order to establish a Red Roof Inn. The northernmost
parcel contains a 52-unit hotel with a manager's apartment. The southernmost parcel contains a 16-unit motel. The
middle parcel contains a laundromat and has the development potential to have 5 hotel units. At the present time,
much of the parking for the three existing businesses is located on the rights-of-way of both Gulfyiew and Coronado
streets.
The applicant is entitled to 40 hotel rooms per acre in accordance with the Resort Facilities High plan category and
the Tourist zoning district. The maximum number of rooms that may be developed on the entire site, pursuant to
Section 2-801.1 of the Community Development Code, is 48 rooms. Therefore, the existing site, with 68 hotel
rooms, a manager's apartment and a laundromat, is nonconforming regarding density/floor area. The applicant
proposes to demolish the southernmost hotel and the laundromat and construct twenty-one new hotel rooms on top
of the remaining hotel and to construct a parking lot to the south of the building. The applicant is requesting to
terminate the status of nonconformity and to be recognized as a conforming use with a density of 73 hotel rooms
and one manager's apartment.
The termination of the status of nonconformity entitles the property owner to continue and to expand as a lawfully
existing use subsequent to Level 2 Community Development Board approval. In order to obtain approval, the
property owner must improve the property according to the following requirements:
1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed.
2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-
1202(D).
3 . Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot
shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this Development Code.
Following is an analysis of the applicant's compliance with the requirements:
1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed.
Pursuant to Section 3-1202 C. of the Community Development Code, perimeter buffers are not required of
developments located in the Tourist District. The applicant, however, has submitted a landscape plan
showing extensive perimeter buffering along Gulfview Boulevard. The landscaping exceeds the
requirements for perimeter buffering and provides palms and flowering trees, shrubs and groundcovers.
It is a creative and colorful landscape plan that includes lilies, irises and oleanders. The landscaping will
enhance the look of Gulfyiew Boulevard. Staff recommends that the applicant substitute sabal palms for
the proposed Washingtonian palms to compliment the other recently approved landscaping along
Gulfview Boulevard.
2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-
1202(D).
Section 3-1202 D. requires that the applicant landscape areas equal to 10% of the gross vehicular use ar-
eas. The applicant is proposing to exceed the requirements by devoting 11.9% of the vehicular use area to
landscaping. Thirteen live oaks and twelve crape myrtles will be planted in the landscaped islands and
surrounding the parking lot. The code requires that the live oaks be 12 feet high with a four inch caliper.
The landscape plan proposed only ten foot high oaks with 3 inch calipers. The site plan will require
Page 2
.
.
amendment to reflect this requirement prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3. Any nonconforming sign, ontdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on
the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this Development Code.
The applicant has submitted a statement on the application form noting that all signage, lighting and ac-
cessories will be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with the regulations. The applicant has
not proposed any new lighting or signage at this time but is aware of the requirements governing these
two items.
When the applicant submits building permit applications for signage and/or lighting, the application will
be in compliance with the current regulations.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
The redevelopment of this site will significantly enhance this portion of Clearwater Beach and will result in the
upgrading of both the facilities and the physical environment. The reuse of the existing units in another location
and the conversion of the laundromat to allow five additional units can be supported on site.
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on July 15, 1999.
Based on the on the application, the proposal is in compliance with the criteria for termination of the status of
nonconformity. Therefore, the staff and the Development Review Committee recommend approval of the
application for the Aegean Sands Hotel located at 421 S. Gu1fview Blvd. with the following conditions:
· The applicant shall substitute sabal palms for the proposed Washingtonian palms to compliment other recently
approved landscaping along Gulfview Boulevard.
· The applicant shall amend the site plan to reflect plant materials and sizes required by the Code prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
Prepared by: Antonia Gerli, Development Review Manager
Assistant Planning Director Approval: ~
~.
Planning Director Approval:
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
Page 3
~.
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: August 17. 1999
Agenda Item: III B.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Aegean Associates, Ltd.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Harry S. Cline, Esq., MacFarlane, Ferguson & McMullen, Attorneys at
Law
LOCATION:
421 Gulfview Blvd.
REQUEST:
Termination of the status of nonconformity.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plans, section/elevations and landscape plans prepared by Robert
Resch of Graham Design Associates.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1.21 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Two Hotels and a laundromat
Hotel
PLAN CATEGORY:
Resort Facilities High
WNING DISTRICT:
Tourist District
ADJACENT LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial retail
Restaurant
Hotels and motels
Public parking lot and Gulf of Mexico
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY:
The property is located across the street from the Beach. The
immediate vicinity is devoted to tourist uses.
Page 1
.
.
.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to redevelop three parcels of land in order to establish a Red Roof Inn. The northernmost
parcel contains a 52-unit hotel with a manager's apartment. The southernmost parcel contains a 16-unit motel. The
middle parcel contains a laundromat and has the development potential to have 5 hotel units. At the present time,
much of the parking for the three existing businesses is located on the rights-of-way of both Gulfview and Coronado
streets.
The applicant is entitled to 40 hotel rooms per acre in accordance with the Resort Facilities High plan category and
the Tourist zoning district. The maximum number of rooms that may be developed on the entire site, pursuant to
Section 2-801.1 of the Community Development Code, is 48 rooms. Therefore, the existing site, with 68 hotel rooms,
a manager's apartment and a laundromat, is nonconforming regarding density/floor area. The applicant proposes to
demolish the southernmost hotel and the laundromat and construct twenty-one new hotel rooms on top of the
remaining hotel and to construct a parking lot to the south of the building. The applicant is requesting to terminate
the status of nonconformity and to be recognized as a conforming use with a density of 73 hotel rooms and one
manager's apartment.
The termination of the status of nonconformity entitles the property owner to continue and to expand as a lawfully
existing use subsequent to Level 2 Community Development Board approval. In order to obtain approval, the
property owner must improve the property according to the following requirements:
1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed.
2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-
1202(D).
3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot
shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this Development Code.
Following is an analysis of the applicant's compliance with the requirements:
1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed.
Pursuant to Section 3-1202 C. of the Community Development Code, perimeter buffers are not required of
developments located in the Tourist District. The applicant, however, has submitted a landscape plan
showing extensive perimeter buffering along Gulfview Boulevard. The landscaping exceeds the
requirements for perimeter buffering and provides palms and flowering trees, shrubs and groundcovers. It
is a creative and colorful landscape plan that includes lilies, irises and oleanders. The landscaping will
enhance the look of Gulfview Boulevard. Staff recommends that the applicant substitute sabal palms for
the proposed Washingtonian palms to compliment the other recently approved landscaping along Gulfview
Boulevard.
2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-
1202(D).
Section 3-1202 D. requires that the applicant landscape areas equal to 10% of the gross vehicular use areas.
The applicant is proposing to exceed the requirements by devoting 11.9% of the vehicular use area to land-
scaping. Thirteen live oaks and twelve crape myrtles will be planted in the landscaped islands and sur-
rounding the parking lot. The code requires that the live oaks be 12 feet high with a four inch caliper. The
landscape plan proposed only ten foot high oaks with 3 inch calipers. The site plan will require amendment
to reflect this requirement prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Page 2
,.
.
.
3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on
the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this Development Code.
The applicant has submitted a statement on the application form noting that all signage, lighting and acces-
sories will be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with the regulations. The applicant has not
proposed any new lighting or signage at this time but is aware of the requirements governing these two
items.
When the applicant submits building permit applications for signage and/or lighting, the application will be
in compliance with the current regulations.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
The redevelopment of this site will significantly enhance this portion of Clearwater Beach and will result in the
upgrading of both the facilities and the physical environment. The reuse of the existing units in another location and
the conversion of the laundromat to allow five additional units can be supported on site.
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on July 15, 1999.
Based on the on the application, the proposal is in compliance with the criteria for termination of the status of
nonconformity. Therefore, the staff and the Development Review Committee recommend approval of the application
for the Aegean Sands Hotel located at 421 S. Gulfview Blvd. with the following conditions:
. The applicant shall substitute sabal palms for the proposed Washingtonian palms to compliment other recently
approved landscaping along Gulfview Boulevard.
. The applicant shall amend the site plan to reflect plant materials and sizes required by the Code prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
Prepared by: Antonia Gerli, Development Review Manager
Assistant Planning Director Approval:
Planning Director Approval:
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
"'",.
0;:;
Page 3