Loading...
FLS2003-10052 (See APP2003-00007) 'J ' J~:~. 2-3/03 (?.-/ nOD,". ~ Clearwater -~~ ()~ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ORf G'~dl~' ';\ ",.. iV. '~"""""r . g:~EE :~~~E~ d-1Jf6~1;'~~r RECE!VED BY (staff irJ.itial~: ,asB-T"o- ATLAS PAGE #: ~ r ZONING DISTRICT: h::.&t..:' LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: e.V SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: ~ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ~ SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ~ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00 * NOTE: 14 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 8/15/03) ~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT~ A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME th c; ( t e:s 'l~. ~d. _~~\Ad '1 13. IY\ el 'i C .5 f) ~ 3 (\!\ \ I \ fi L 1 ,~3' j (n ",'t MAILING ADDRESS:,-)..~.J~ j ~ l.~\ \,.,1,,)(1-'-1 ,-\.-:5 \ q f\ d } c... C' c{ '( UJ(.:t,. -I~ e (~ .::J T"r- L PHONE NUMBER: 'I ;'11- ,,5,"-3). Lf FAX NUMBER: /.('12- 6: S:< 3 (I ) ~ ~ ' \ \",2 '\. PROPERTY OWNER(S): I.~' \(:'1.< h: s l\.. d. \j u. OLot u. '~ ~\e-tc1 e_5 (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: ",/'~ ,/' E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) " ~3..3 i)\ .\ d UXV....1 ~--f~ <s '\ Q n d. ko'\- SO---L-p la+c.:'\> U,~.'\- _3I~tQn c\ E~;S+CL+e5 CIS Y t: Co (d e:....d.~_ 4;)\Cl.'t bc~:h )./ ':.t.; tXlCl c: &,( ~d (e.J () I I ,I J '1 r' II :;: /) I>'J 1/'\., 6 o I y 0\ \..) -/) 70\ L..i L.x!,)q-l -,. (acres, square feet) (\ . ~--p- " (\ . I. '.. ,\ "- PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): '"'. \' . (A iY\ l L 1\ '''')1 <; ~, (number of dwelling nits, hotel rooms or squ re footage of nonresidential use) 1:- (~\J().( c. c:~ \ \~U.~ be 'C C) ~ I .2 q / /,:5-/ if 33f:t; / ClOG L o'&C() , , f , --- DESCRIPTION OF REOUEST(S): Ke \'f\S \Cl\ Luxa.t\c()t.,e 0.1 DY1q 6CU.+rL~ r-., I)e ( +\ 1 \ n e,..l__ (include all requested code deviations; e.g, reduction in rEiquired number or-parking spaces, ecific use, etc,) (~C.COCc\l ~,L;!j)e'c~~ O~fa'h' DnS ip_,_0te( n\',~t.- #=tJt(~~~'0_dCl+ed Ck1)O.~ J C;~. ()O n' ef\r.=.e.. VJa~ rCff\G"lJ r.::d Lu\n\. tiU,.i C)Ufy.efJ~\2? \01'\ and ~_4--!\iJ_~_ fIo ~ ~ (""":,.... .I (\ r ;-"" \ II "". /'~~ ,""",\ ....,...; ''''',... .. ~ \ __ STREET ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER:* PARCEL SIZE: Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application ingle Family Residentiallnfill Project- ity of Clearwater . . . J-~OES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES __ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) )( Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land wil! be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 1\-)" \. \": ~ 'Ke-\ l\..:;k\ \ Q -h D f\ c:H.- c:'ll r .. C:. Y\(: e l1.t\ ctL:\~c:\c:e (\'"'\ P fOfe. (.t-\ C:5. It)Ou... \d '() e..:- ~ n Y\Q ({'rl 0 r\lt lO \ -\-~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. .If-enc.e: Ll)()u...k:.\ 1''\Dt h; ,\de( 3. . 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. C'. \ \ _f'{\ + t"\,., , ~\l'l 't)f{) pOSe.d .~. e nt.t:' c.UOc.L.Lj y\C\\)C V\.O U,-t.+el2.. e>f\ '+ro. ~\c C'. . 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. C'U 'C '),," oSt" d" {"l C'. e- .:5 &)n:5 j:S +t.::rr'~ LU ~t 'f\ C)~h e ( '\~e n '" ;5 ,,, -rt"e.... C\ff'CL) r\.e~.c;:~r,oc:d. I '\ \~} 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. O. ()-" \ (", . . ., \ .' . r~ . L ' . i \ L u.. '('1 L'?fJE):>CA'~ e f\ c. e... . ,LV I. \, \ ('(\\ (\ ~ ~I 1.L:... \..lACe e..T U I ~ {1 ~,i {).(~~_E:55 )V (Ofr\ "\c'ne.. :5G'o:;\n -:~)\..;~e o+- +h.e C1..'bu.rhv,ci vroft:("r:r j \ hi-o D\~-'+~~D (~({'CL l\douc dau<;fht-e-<-d be~roorn., · <J )( Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. Lei \ \"'\.c~ d .e. \)\' a..A< 0 n 'S O~=_ 1- hs:. de. v e:.l 0 yJ q\ en -t ::.:;; '\un C\CH d.5 LVc. (lCt n n t t h':'.-f}-;:lo..c. e~.nJ~., (.:.,~ r4,!. \ ,'Y\..~ \:"1 e.... c\. ~e i\(\ e). , .... . (" , U i( , , t ') . -'f r j Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater ,," 1 2. . ! . The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) tJ D, OU (\'e ne ~,va 5 Of ~ ,~~ i N~ nl.:1jJ~\S-=bl \ e (~_, l t)FG hr~J!l!11 . T+ (OU.:. i~!:L~t.I' + (~C;if\4.-\~-\.~Ot'\ wV\eq -t-\~ \JjQ~ re~\D ilCA) J u ~~ 1008, -rhe- C-L\.{ /t:: fl -\- OLt)Y\t:. f> <=*-1-"..:- S()i.~-\-~fn; (lbu..**\ \"'C~l)l)f-eCtl \)U{Ch~\+t\ , "',' . ech, I .l-h-e., ~eJY,;_e.. d.\Ct V\O:r eV9cc-\- 'l\'h'~~ \(' (1C:.::>; (e. 10 PHCt'I.{-\..)l:: -"'r'l\> \\C( e: 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. FC\\ (" t'S 01. Ce:.\)e,<: \''f\:;' \\- e, 0 U,j'\.-~h ~J\'\"he c:,~ -kl. c\~' C!.le(~ CW4'J.C l~ . 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill projectare compatible with adjacent land uses. , ;, \ ' ~t~'? "'-ht: --us-e o-\a ,\-C"\(' e:.. \5 _ ~Dn\f C\.li b Ie. 1!J}\'H, C~..d\(le.en-\ \and lt~:0 '--' 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.) , [ " r " ' \' i . . \'(,5 n+ Cu( '"\:t;'nc.. e L j. l 'rC>1"...-4(V., OUr- Profe< \-1{ +0 -th(" CO(\(1\'\'\Dn \~- C0a.~ t.:>e. ~\.:>r of.':.. +'he "~-eYli" e. \~t~:, I . i l\f"?'i,a ~ \v\'\Cfl'\.()V cd. . '..J \ 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The: .~\.:.(\c. e. \...u ~ \ \ eh hC:tV\ cc.. tv n-p(ofec~1\ r c: >h:.; ~e- C)U,,'- l)r iw). C If ) (4" n A~\ \-5 \..-u \H') -\-h c.. ('.I'\C:t/ a c h:>, '(' c>~ (X.H' ~ Otl'd'l\ d (\ :.~lt ~{ i i)\ 'f,{\ (' (\ to... + f... \J 1\ C : VI t hi . 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width. required setbacks. height and off,street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. '-t..-l...c'\'" " Il ':) ( ' t". . " . \ .. . _ I I ~t:.. rei \'. _ t...... ..-LJ,....'Ll,lcL \)~::.. (C~. Y;''-::J\<.Ll\.c (~ (l e tee c\ ~ \\(1 to +he. '::)fl:ec: .~- ~ t.r.:\:'\-: ()(t~; c'{; ':;~~x rn ~ + 11'- () '10:1 {Jrl (~.., l'''';'';'~ {I J ,t.' fJ ,"},", 1;"2 .( (,,\ I ,'... ',/, i I j) j: i 11,. ,-j i .h., j'Vj i"" .tl}, /'"", 't' [. ,/~~.......... 'L.o.... .~~) _ _/~~'" .,..( '''''' 1"...1-- 'b..?....;:JC (". , ,-,' '"",- l,- I - f ,,' -.J -- _' it L,.._ ..:.i" 011 -,~:: . E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations o COPY OF PERMIT INOUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project- City of Clearwater f" 'j F. I )( !~ ).( . . SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 13 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) 'J{ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. -- -'- - - - - - - - - -- - - -- -- -- -- ~- -1- .-- -\- o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project- City of Clearwater . . J I H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) [] LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '12 X 11) (color rendering if possible); o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part ~comprehensi~ Redevelopm~ Project or ?~~~ject. -T)~~ Ot=' ~6t\~ ~YL.1~ ~ BUILD~~TION DR~S - a~ all buildings including hJight dimensions, colors and materials; -t='~S o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'12 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8'12 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. C9 SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property describ.ed:'f)iS~~:tiO~/ ~.~/ it (/ ..~ >,~) E;' l.,VU.y- 1/ !/1.j~(/~/ii1 /~~__ Signaturt,hf prop,8 y owner:, STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS s(~r~n. to and subscribed before me this . J.:::z-, day of _ ~ A.D. 200.3 to me and/or by .Tv if 11J;..€ - oS IJ. who is )'l~r~onally known has produce"tf iZA 'Je11/&C.- UC-eLt!.~_ as identification. Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnf Bonded lhru VVest6'iri Surety Company '{ . . (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT S:IPlanning OepartmentlApplication Formsldevetopment review\2003 FORMSlsingle family residential inW application 2003.doc Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater t::a . 327~89 1 Sec. 9., Twp. 295. I Rng. l5E. ~ Certified to Charles Q. and Judy B. Melges Flood Zone AE, Minimum Elevation 11 feet, Community Panel #125091 0008 D., Dated 8/19/91. SCALE: 1" = 30' AS:5Vt'460 5J '/.6 .,t<. (fA) Arl'O ;14' ;; (I') , ;.1.'/ / '0"'''' /-tJ ~o .J9 /-J(J." ;/" Ol,~." f IfO. 0 -,'" / --= ~ ~ ... LEGEND: ,e;/Vt: C/T"/ 0;= C~e",4RN4re,e eM I1;!P/SC A./. GA/J) /S.t..4N.t> /N AlOR T# cv..:. 'OIE- S.4'C ~ji'EIV.A,eo /6.1.,4,</D O,Q/VG - ,EJ,. :5..477 I ~C;.V:L>. / ..vI.S.L..:: C).cO' FCM = Found Concrete Monument PRM = Permanent Reference Monument Cov. = Covered Cone. = Concrete C.B. = Concrete Block C.L.F. = Chain Link Fence FOE = Found Open End Pipe C.C. = Covered Concrete R!W = Right-of-Way P. = Plat M. = Measured El. = Elevation FL = Floor Res. = Residence A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF Lot 50, according to the Plat of UNIT 3 ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER as recorded in Plat Book 47, Pages 62 and 63 of the Public Records of Pionellas County, Florida .-v:e:L.7' ..e/W.I./#e- 0'= /I-f/OP./47' /.5t:..,4tVD BASIS OF BEAmNG: PAl P,.I.,d-r " ,4/t/.r:::.t.E"s MEASv,q5'D A/. /2 "O;::{ /$ ~ FELD BOOKZ~4' PAGE. ~ TtK Survey w.. pr....ed without the benefit ot . title ...rch ...d la "')eot to at e......t., Rlght..ot-way and ottMH- _It.... of record. Survey not vlllld unlesa emboa.ed wIth the Surveyor'. ..... I het'eby certity that the aurvey repreaented hereon meeta the requirementa of Chapter Ifi?/Ci7-6 lor' dministratlve Code. Prepared By: JOHN C. BRENDLA II ASSOCIATES, tHe. CONSULTING ENGI'EERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 4015 12nd Avenue North ........ P_k, Florida 34185 (113) 571-7548 i May 5, 1992 JOHN C. BRENDLA ide Swveyor'. R4t9h>tretion No. 1269 ..,r ..n.n~ Ir~_ . <l ~ e I ~ (j I -- ~ / j ;;:0. o$'~ -~gl!!.wat!:H Dr ~ ih St - -'-~ 1 e~Yside-D r _ ~~..-- "Il 02003 MapQuest.com. Inc.; 02003 NaviQation TechnobClies!...- ... f:1'AAPQ~'T"'Er- I ~lI> I"'" J \:::1 ,e: Colg ~l)oo I_~ ;i 3~ · < G> . . Heilwooc:rSt ~ , -:I r"r-~ ele~rw,at~r I~ B:FljITd! '-::1 w ~ Co (II Rockawalt.St ~"--'-, I ] 8~1ll01')1 Sl m CD <II ' J; > ~ <I/.q: <( ~.~ llI" ~ IIS'- ::r- ::::: el lIS cu ~'O... r:: r:: lIS .- ~rf Causeway.Bwd -. T "----\ Clearwater Beach 0'" . Page 1 of 1 e \L .., \ ~ \~- \~ . If), \'8" ',':I \el \90 \~. co -1 ~1 \~ \ \~--0\ ~ . I \. ". ? 0.\\'f\ Se" I . \<; -" ~~~.J,~ - /..\1\ \S ?~ ~ I .....~ SY;~r\?t; \1"' 1\ 1,- 'lD bO/~_\~ \~. I *\ l -..:.:1 tjo ~~ 10- ... l~~ " :l~ \r ~~~ f" \ /1 "".dward P'7~; :' : ~ . 300m' . 900ft I j 01 . - l- e 'iZ hi" I 'a. · I~l 10> I ,- I~ (I), ~3 (h'\~waLj I6laY\d ~brL()a.-tC("1 ~lD( ida.- . "... If - .') OCT 2 ~ 2003 r , ~ , http://mq-mapgend. websys.aol.com/mqmapgend?MQMapGenRequest=FDR2dmwjDE%... 10/20/2003 . . 1\ ~0- (1 c~,j (i.), -{V r:A-~ { C ,:;)(" -,- X" " 'i '" '~ y.. )< i. 3~:S (1\idLt-Ul :r6bt1~ * -,'" ~ '/. j 'j. / - )<; 'j:> ~ ~'t) 'il)q) fD {' \, ,~""'~..., ~ j,'j '~\~tJ:s_k~6 ~:.\. '. 1. <....,""' ,(' c:.: c; I ''1\- '. ", It /. "Y\.- \ \) \e- r::'C\ e.: t) e: \ c r, \ ~ , \, rr\ I .l('- ~ ,. J-..j / /).(,..., I-'~'i I /1'" " CP ;;/' "L-tk.;Ij I t.-(...I · ,/ r ~; ( ~ {l)/\-"""~ (.;n 3.1,<)- (Y\ ~ d It,ti~.A t. ';.,..." "~~" ~,--'-'--- c. ....... ...- J j ......- \ . +-- S Let. f\.ci K "1 ". ( ,..... .. ~._'"'.- I'l /') ./'1 , ,'I ,.,' , " ,.,j'W_' - i j'" G"\ c~- }-y"./rrw 1 /' +~, .. \ 3 "I "1.- ~\r. '.. \_, . ,_ i~'L i...l. CA./ C,!'... \., :j T l' \ ~\:;1 \!lA."''1 \ or" <:" ~"" It'1, ~..) \1. C, '\ D'l)f't:...d , T4I'rc............. '\ ," "\ tl'." ^" ,> t::_, I'-'C,,,,, l f/ i / 'if'- J~5.,..~\ i~~;1;21~L9 d. E N ,.,-~",.- C:, -'1 -~ , Jli VV ('\ 'l,' \ ,.' 'I' \ ,. \ "', I l ) I' ;,:", .,,- ~" ',,, j'" '\.,,,, I June 1980 May 1983 May 1988 September 1996 February 1997 May 2001 October 2002 On or about June 1-32003 July 10,2003 July 2003 July 25, 2003 July 28, 2003 . e Back2round Narrative 333 Midway Island purchased by Charles Q. & Judy B. Melges Dock and overhead lift installed. Pool, deck, planter and backyard landscaping completed. Second story addition and remodeling completed. Wood fence installed along the south property line; 4" inside our propcrty line. 325 Midway Island, abutting our south property line, was purchased by Mr. & Mrs. James Lathrop. Lathrop's begin removal of rear concrete patio, over hang, and plants in preparation for pool and deck installation. Removal of existing concrete circular driveway also began at this time. Our wood fence along the south property line of 333 Midway Island was removed without our permission. The Lathrops installed a white vinyl fence without a permit. The fence encroaches onto our property. We reinstalled a portion of our wooden fence. The Lathrops were cited for the following violations: installing a fence without a permit(north & south property lines); installing a fence not in compliance with the codes ( north & south property lines); installation of a paver driveway without a permit; and violating the 10' view triangle in the rear of their property (north and south property lines) Julie Phillips and Al Ruud informed us the reinstalled portion of our fence was in violation of the code. A new permit was needed to reinstall our fence. A permit could be issued only if the proposed fence was in compliance with the current code. They suggested we go to the Zoning Department. Zoning informed us even though the fence was removed from our property without our permission, we could not reinstall a fence that did not meet current codes. . e Mid August 2002 Julie Phillips referred us to Frank Gerlock in the Zoning Department. Mr. Gerlock advised he would find out if we could appeal to get a permit issued to reinstall our fence according to the original specifications, and if so, to whom. October 7, 2003 Frank Gerlock informed us to submit a Flexible Standard Development Application along with a current survey by October 24,2003. October 10, 2003 John C. Brendla & Associates, Inc. surveyed our property. October 24, 2003 Flexible Standard Development Application was submitted. In our neighborhood, Island Estates, there are many homes with structures, fences and landscaping that do not meet the current codes. These conditions have all been "grandfathered", as was our wood fence. We believe it sets a dangerous precedent to allow someone to deliberately and purposefully alter those "grandfathered" conditions without the consent of the property owner, thereby, rendering the property owner powerless to restore his property. We request to be allowed to replace our fence as originally permitted. Respectfully, ~. ,,:~~:'~.'/();Ip' '1 ,,2~'- J l~~// ~ PI/ t-L/ I'" - /}r/; ,/ 1/' ~ ..> ! ~ I Charles Q. Melges 'j . "I!s-'-. I, rb;i't.1lu.. '~~// ! ~ I f) J dy B. Melges \ .&1'f~, CITaJF CLEARWATER CENTRAai'ERMITTING \~&~~i PLEAS~LL 562-4580 BEFORE MIDNIGHT FOR PXT DAY INSPECTION ~ "WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WI YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING R r:'E OF COMMENCEMENT." Date Date DRYVVALl Date ENGINEERING FINAL HOOD/COM I Date Date Date 1 ST ROUGH GAS FINAL GAS Date I Date Date Date Date I I Date Date ADDRESS: I ' "~ . , !" ,.' (- ~ ~. i ~';' ~,;~ f,.~:i"" ;','- i ~.ftj r)! >~~~::!~"}: ~. .. ') i-. ; ~ (< , :. ~.' ~ r~~;~, ~~;_t, X,~::!H(~"f< :;'l,) .; ~ ~~ ;:-;. ~ ~>_~~< t;'i{f.LJ ~ L i-' it i< ~ -; ~ ~ . ~.:~'~..~....;, :~.'~:;~,kh..~'l l'.LJ ~;..::~_,~t,~ l.;: l~ ~:; :::~, ~~ ; J ." j,:-;~';'-';i .l,tA ~:rt ~ ~ .f. '~.~".~. .} ,";', ~! 1 \J~" \ ,,::,!. ';'~:-"-' ,;~ COMBINATION PERMIT #: t'j}j-~ ~ ,~(t ~::.<tf~~~) ~ j C," L::. 0006 :~~u~ i~'~;~:~ 02/03/S7 ~E .OJ'' '. :to'Ji-'N C~E nrrn. JIlT Tr'\ nr nr'\C"'Trn AT ir\r'l 10/28/2CC3 17:~2 72744255=3 . CHUCI< HEL ':iES . FAX To: Brian Berry- Fax # 562-4865 From: Judy Melges Date: 28 October 2003 Pages; Two (2) (cover + one) Re: 333 Midway Island. Clearwater 33676 Per your request, I am faxing to you a hand drawn map indicating the dimensions and placement of our wood fence, as it was installed on February 3, ] 997. FN:;E 81 ~l -SX A l~ I ~ -0 , - N) ~ ~ ~' 1 I ~ ! - ~ ( ~... ~ ~-,).. .i \ ~t? ........... ........... ]~~ "- ( j.a -""6 _ .1 ~ ~'" t"t) . ~ s:: -- ~ \.- ) d j~ u ~ 3 ~ d 3 ~ v ~ \f) ~I I \ll ~= ,~ ~ 1~8 Jl\l~ a~o ~-- U"-~ 1>8}! 'i ~ ~ c I: : o.s;;.f " ~~\.I 1\ l - II ,..-~ ----J \ '..-- .. - . .........,..", I \ / "' \./ / / '\)-0 C \J (() ~~ ~ - V\ _\ --- _tl c::.~~ -....:J · - c-- 'i51--.~ ~ \) ~ <V cl~ ~ ~J ~ ~ + \J \.J -f. \() i ~_.'--' I I -0 ~ ~ f~ r g ~ . S3':.!T3~'.J >[lIlH:=! \l} \ ,L ~ V 30 39\:7d ill :5 :z . SG9'33t>tL3L 30:LT ED03/SG/Or Pinellas County Property A.ser Information: 08 29 15 4334400.00 Page 2 of 4 08 / 29 / 15 / 43344 / 000 / 0500 21-0ct-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:44:40 Ownership InforMation Residential Prope rty Add ress. Use. and Sales HEL6ES. CHARLES 0 HElGES. JUDY B 333 HIDWAY IS CLEARWATER Fl 33161-2318 COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 333 HI D WA Y ISL of Jan 1, 2003, bas e d on Census Trac t : 260.01 sales froM 2001 - 2002: 991.900 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMp Plat InforMation 0 /1.980 5.021/1. 583 152.900 (0) I 1958 : Book 041 Pgs 062-063 0 /1.912 3.801/ 404 62.500 (0) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2003 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 196.300 HOMestead: 25.000 Ownership % 1.000 SAUE-OUR-HOHES CAP Historic : 0 Use %: 1.000 Assessed/Cap: 361.100 Tax Ex e Mp t %: .000 Other ExeMp t : 0 Taxable: 342.100 Agricultural: 0 2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation District: CW Seawall: YES Frontage: Canal/River Clearwate r View: 03 Millage: 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 03 Taxes: 1.891.41 1) 81 x 120 5.350.00 80. 10 f Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 . 00 .00 Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 11.805.54 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 528.888 2003 taxes will be : 18.382.61 Short Legal ISLAND ESTATES Of CLEARWATER UNIT 3 Description LOT 50 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. uslhtbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b=1 &c= 1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=08+2... 10/27/2003 Pinellas County Property A.iser Information: 08 29 154334400.00 Page 4 of4 ~ ~i ~ cP- O ---- 65 .--------- co o CD r- 2--- o .~. ~ 67 f\ ___--------- ----- CD o eJ) o 5\ C;J -- 0) ---1 68 0 CD (f\ --- 69 (0 0 p ~ .-J OJ . (J\ 70 (j) \::::J 49 ~ C}J .t::> o --- -------- --.\ CD CJ' 7\ 0) o co () co 48 ~ ------ ---l _~ (j) 11 co r"""" co 4 7 --;-- ..,'p.. ---- Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=I&a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=08+2... 10/27/2003 CLWCoverSheet . . FLS2003-10052 333 MIDWAY ISL 3 Date Received: 10/23/2003 CHARLES 0 & JUDY B MELGES ZONING DISTRICT: IEOD LAND USE: RU ATLAS PAGE: 267B ", ~_'?t~J_~\~ n .--. \0- ,2 O''::} :.>i".~ i~:: _..___~~ _~."_,Q _ _.___..'__._.___ _.4 ~ 8 :::8 o <:r: ~ 00 r<) <n N .. ____ 00 o N ,........; 2) ...... N N o ~ ~ o o o or<') 00 00 o~ or<') Or"l ~O 0""" o "" N~ - ~ :it;~ - Q., .... QJ C.J QJ ~ "C o;J ~ .... C ::l o a 00( . o o 6 o ...... o o o o ...... V7 o o o o ...... V7 ";J .... -; 0 E-o "C - a ... 0 .. E-< ... 0;;:; .... <J i:: - - ... 0 i:: 0 ... i:r:: Ul ... ;to: c .... e :i :: (l) c ~ ... 0 ~ is ::I: ~ ~ ...... <J N <J \0 00( N ... ...... ::l "T C r<) ... I .. 0 ~ ...... 0 0 z a ... I.,: c 0 U 0 Z .... C ::l 0 <J r<) <J 00( 0\ 00 ...... o Q} E o .t) - - -- :J E 0 Q} Q} Cl..:S cu 0 '- - QIIl c:cCU :!: .Q i6 D::cui.i= Wt):+::l a.=0 <e2:c f-cu15 Oc- zcu= (I)'-~ -.2:J (1)_0 - Cl.. >. ::I: .- f-Q}"O t) C ~ cu cu"O Q} .~ ~ III .g? .- > .r:: Q} f- '- Q} ..0 ~ .... i:: ~ Ul C (l) o ~ ;-:: ~ 0.. .... 0;: r.fJ ~ ~ ... (l) o ~ o ;to: .::: = ~ ~ ~ Ul ... "C o U = ~ ... E-o N o r.fJ i:.I.l o ....:i i:.I.l :::8 ;>-< ~ ~ o<l r.fJ i:.I.l ~ <:r: ::r: u ... ... >. ~ ~ N <n 0 0 - 0 r<) 0 z 0 "C 0,; ... N <Il r.fJ 0 ..:.: a ~ ....:i .c u U [Ii .... ... ~ ... (l) .:::: - ~ A ;:: U ... ... = e :i ... ~ ~ ~ 'B " ~ c .Q ~ Cl.. Cl.. cu Q} :S 4- o () ~ 0... .~ c .Q ro .S:l Cl.. Cl.. cu .~ .r:: f- , . . CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REviEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 December 08, 2003 Mr. Charles and Judy Melges 333 Midway Island Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-1 0052 at 333 Midway Island Dear Mr. Melges: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On December 04, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a six foot solid wooden fence along the side (south) property line at 333 Midway Island and terminating eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line within the waterfront sight visibility triangle, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1603.E.2. The DRC recommended denial of the application on the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2-1603.E.2; 2. The plan does not comply with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3- 913; 3. The proposed development is not compliant with the waterfront sight visibility triangles under the provisions of Section 3-904.B; and 4. The proposed development is not compatible with the surrounding area; I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, deny your application for Flexible Standard Development. The denial is based on the site plan and application dated received October 23, 2003 Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal may be initiated within seven days ofthe date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on December 17,2003 (seven working days from date of Development Order). BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT I-L>\J',1ILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBIlARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFI~\IATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" e . DRC Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Time: Applicant: Address: December 04, 2003 FLS2003-10052 10:40 Mr. Charles and Judy Melges 333 Midway Island CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development to permit a six foot, solid wooden fence along the side (south) property line at 333 Midway Island and terminating eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line within the waterfront sight visibility triangle, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-160 1.E.2 EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: Island Estates Overlay District (lEaD), Low Medium Density Residential District (LMDR), Residential Urban Classification Category, (RU) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Single Family residential Proposed Use: Six-foot wooden fence within the waterfront sight visibility triangle. ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: North: Low Medium Density Residential District / Residential Urban Category West: Low Medium Density Residential District / Residential Urban Category East: Water South: Low Medium Density Residential District / Residential Urban Category CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Condition: The 0.22-acre site is located on the east side of Midway Island, approximately 1,800 feet north of Windward Passage. The application is to permit a six- E:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard Flexl/nactive or Finished CaseslMidway Is/. 333 - Melges (IEOD) - DeniedlMidway Isl 333 Staff Report. doc- Page l . . foot, solid wooden fence along the side (south) property line and terminate eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line within the waterfront sight visibility triangle. Proposal: In February of 1997, the applicant applied for and was permitted to erect 66 linear feet of six-foot solid wooden fence along the side (south) property line. The six-foot fencing was permitted to terminate eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line. In January of 1999 the City adopted a new Community Development Code and in doing so created many legal non-conformities. The purpose of nonconformity provisions are to regulate and limit the development and continued existence of structures which were lawful on the date of the adoption of this Code, but which would be prohibited under the terms established herein. Due to external circumstances, the applicant's legal non-conforming wooden fence was removed by an adjacent neighbor and replaced with a white PVC fence meeting the requirements set forth in Section 3-904.B which are "to enhance views of the water from residential waterfront property, no structure or landscaping may be installed, other than a fence around a swimming pool or any non- opaque fences not exceeding 36 inches, in the 45 degree angle formed by ten feet back from the property line on the water and along the side property line." On September 19, 2002, Island Estates adopted a Neighborhood Plan, which specifies additional goals, and objectives for maintaining the existing characteristic of the neighborhood. One of the governing objectives under the second goal is to "Preserve water views by restricting the heights of fences and structures in the waterfront yard and by maintaining established side building setbacks, rear building setbacks and site triangles." All fencing that has been permitted along waterfront property since 1999 has adhered to Section 3- 904.B of the Community Development Code. The fence would not be consistent with the waterfront sight visibility triangle or the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. The fence would not be compatible with neighboring adjacent fencing and helping to create a form and function, which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: A stop work order was issued for the wood fence installed on the southeast comer of the property without permits or inspections. STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2- 160HE): STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT PERMITTED MAXIMUM 7.5 dwelling One dwelling One dwelling [X] DENSITY units unit unit IMPERVIOUS 0.65 N/A N/A [X] SURFACE RATIO (ISR) LOT AREA 5,000 square 9,600 square 9,600 square [X] (minimum) feet feet feet E:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlStandard FlexlInactive or Finished CaseslMidway IsI. 333 - Melges (IEOD) - DeniedlMidway IsI 333 Staff Report. doc- Page 2 . . LOT WIDTH 50 feet 80 feet 80 feet [X] (minimum) FRONT 25 feet N/A N/A [X] SETBACK REAR 15 feet N/A N/A [X] SETBACK SIDE 5 feet N/A N/A [X] SETBACK HEIGHT 30 feet N/A N/A [X] (maximum) PARKING 2 per unit 2 spaces 2 spaces [X] SPACES COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBLE STANDARD CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT IN ISLAND ESTATES OVERLAY DISTRICT (LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) (Section 2-1601.E.2): 2.a. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; b. Single-family detached dwellings and community residential homes with six or fewer residents are the only permitted uses eligible for residential infill project application; c. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development standards; d. The development of a parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; e. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; f. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; g. The design of the proposed residential infill project Consistent [ ] Inconsistent [X] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] E:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard Flexllnactive or Finished CaseslMidway Is!, 333 - Melges (IEOD) - DeniedlMidway Isl 333 Staff Report. doc- Page 3 . creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; and h. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards is justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. . [ ] [X] COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working In the neighborhood. 4. Development IS designed to mInImIZe traffic congestion. 5. Development IS consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development mInImIZeS adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Inconsistent [ ] [X] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] [X] [ ] E:\Planning Department\C D BIStandard Flexllnactive or Finished CaseslMidway Is!' 333 - Melges (IEOD) - DeniedlMidway Isl 333 Staff Report. doc- Page 4 . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 18, 2003. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Standard Development application to permit a six foot, solid wooden fence along the side (south) property line at 333 Midway Island and terminating eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line within the waterfront sight visibility triangle, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1601.E.2 on the following bases: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section 2-1601.E.2; 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The development does not comply with the goals and objectives set forth in the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; and 4. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Bryan Berry, Planner E:IP/anning Department\C D B\Standard F/exlInactive or Finished CaseslMidway Is/. 333 - Me/ges (IEOD) - DeniedlMidway Is/ 333 Staff Report. doc- Page 5 . . December 2,2003 Mr. Charles and Judy Melges, The following are comments generated from the preliminary Development Review Committee on November 18,2003. Please be prepared to address these and any other comments generated at the scheduled Development Review Meeting for 333 Midway Island on December 4, 2003 at 10:40. The city requests that yourself or a representative be present for the Development Review Meeting at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater, FL on the second floor of the Municipal Services building. Please call and verify your time with Sherrie Nicodemus at 562-4582. I look forward to meeting with you. The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No Comments 2. Stormwater: a) No Comments 3. Traffic Enl?:ineerinl?:: a) No Comments 4. General Enl?:ineerinl?:: a) No Comments 5. Planninl?:: a) The proposed application is not in compliance with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan objective "to preserve water views by restricting the heights of fences and structures in the waterfront yard and by maintaining established side building setbacks, rear building setbacks and site triangles." b) Section 3-904.B of the Community Development Code states, "To enhance views of the water from residential waterfront property, no structure or landscaping may be installed, other than a fence around a swimming pool or any non-opaque fences not exceeding 36 inches, in the 45 degree angle formed by ten feet back from the property line on the water and along the side property line." 6. Solid Waste: a) No Comments 7. Land Resources: a) No Comments 8. Fire: a) No Comments 9. Environmental: a) No Comments 10. Communitv Response: a) No Comments 11. Landscapinl?:: a) No Comments Sincerely, Bryan Berry Planner DEC-03-20D3 13:2D MONEY STREET MORTG~GE $MONEY TREET Date: / 2./3 To: 8~ IAN "3€/l.o/ Fax: $"fs,2 -'1 Kt; r:- From: Jim Lathrop Pages: Z- RE: 1PIef;e7 . Monev Street Mortaags, Inc. 1822 Drew Street, Suite 1 Clearwater FL 33765 Phone: 727-545-5626 Fax: 727-466-0954 Money Street Mortgage Phone: 727-545-5626 X25 Fax: 727-466-0954 727 466 0954 p.el DEC-03-20C13 13:20 rUEl STREET i1DFTGAGE ,...,.-.~ (Co.l 466 0'35.'1 P~02 . . December 2, 2003 Mr. Bryan Berry Planner City of Clearwater Planning Department Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 RE: 333 Midway Island Application for Flexible Standard Development Project Scheduled for Review on De(ember 4, 2003 Dear Mr. Berry; Thank you for your time and attention during our telephone conversation today regarding the Flexible Standard Development Application for 333 Midway Island. We wanted to take this opportunity to state in writing that we, as weJl as all of the neighbors we spoke with, are opposed to tlll$ project. After reviewing the flexibility criteria for residential infill projects, it is our understanding that this project does not meet these requirements. We believe that if this project were approved it would negatively affect our property value by blocking our waterfront vie"" within the sight visibility triangle. In addition, this request is not consistent with the deed restrictions within ls1and Estates, the NCOD, nor city and county ordinances. Other property owncrs within Is laud Estates are not placing fencing within the sight visibility triangle so this project is not compatlble with adjacent land uses. As a rule, residents want to enjoy the water views rather than block them. As you are aware, there was an original board on board wood fence located between our property and theirs. Chuck and Judy Melges agreed to allow us to remove their strllcture and replace it with a new white vinyl fence that would meet city guidelines for fencing. At that time, Moore Design removed their fence and replaced it with the white vinyl. We invested over $4,000 on the new white vinyl fence to beautify our property and theirs We originally placed the 6' panels offence at 20 feet from the seawall (city code). Wt; were forced to correct this problem by the zoning department and remove 5 feet of fencing in order to be compliant with the city's enforcement of the NeOD requirements of25 feet. Furthermore, we attempted to plant a double trunk adollidia palm tree within the site triangle that we were forced to remove in order to be in compliance. As such, the request at hand does not correlate with the requirements that W~ have been forced to comply with in Ollr efforts to improve the value of our propeny. If you have ally additional questions, please l~el free to conta~t ~s at (727) 462-0008. Respectfully submitted, ~~) 325 Midway l~:iland Clearwater Florida 33767 TIJTRL F'. 02 J TIME 12/02/2003 11:41 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524576 TEL 7275624567 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REROR 12/02 11:40 94426523 00:00:55 02 OK STANDARD ECM , . . ~iulcarwater u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: M~. C~S AND ~lAJ>Y tUEL&E:S FAX: 44-'2-- kC;;1- ~ Phone:-----1"-41 - '3 3 2-4- FROM: 6(U(~ ~ DATE: ( 2..l~J c ~ Phone: ~ 2--+53 ~ SUBJECT: 1) ~ G~-&. ~n.. 3~~ )A:l~ I~.. A.",J NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 2-. . . Page 2 of2 ~ 333 Midway Island Atlas Page: 267B -JULIE PHilLIPS FlS2003-10051 29/28/16/49856/000/0030 2906 Wildwood Dr. Atlas Page: 211 B - JANICE KING Planner: John Schodtler FLS2003-10050 727 Bay Esplanade 05-29-15-54666-035-0070 Galasso Atlas # 249A - JULIE PHilLIPS FLS2003-10049 717 Bay Esplanade 05-29-15-54666-035-0050 Oi-Un Investmenst Atlas # 258A - JULIE PHilLIPS FLS2003-10053 123 Bayside Dr 08-29-15-04950-002 -0050 Feldman Atlas # 276A - JULIE PHilLIPS 1]/13/2003 e . Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. ;-:::;-L -~::;~,,;)()o:::{ .... ,,/'/}9,~,~ Meeting Date: --"", /' )... .,.,.._ "', /'>/7//" ..... -t. ~. . /./ ,[,. 'O~7- ( .__.....J.. /., /"v > " i r'. {~/'. /' c_ .- ,.1'.- /, /1 fE' ,,/ J ,,/ -,~L..,.. <. t' ......7 /' /' -...-''. / '7 ; ". /,/" '. . I. .,L.- /' o Current Use: /c_.-- (" ,/j /'.--, . ./.// Location: ,_:S=~5:~5? /' . /.('/r '/7!(' ./ o Active Code Enforcement Case (no) yes: o Address number (@)(no) (vacant land) o Landscaping (~~(no) o Overgrown (yes) ~J/ o Debris (yes) ~) o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) ~l? o Building(s) 8(fair) (poor) (vacant land) o Fencing (none) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) o paint~~~fair) (poor) (garish) o Grass Parking (yes) ~. .,--- o Residential Parking Violations (yes) ~, o Signage ~)Ok) (not ok) (billboard) ".--~ o Parking~,;(striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) o Dumpster (enclosed) ~:. o Outdoor storage (yes) C@:~ Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): / Date: I / /~F' Reviewed by; I! 0 Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 ~-J. '/'pi( Telephone: j'~:,) .. '/ ?-,~o . e 2- c cu E E :::0 rJ) .2 c :;;; E o :'= ;.: >. OJ -0 ~ OJ .~ 0::: (/) CD CO L() (j) (/) f'-.. f- c C"0 0 (j) C"0 :2: ~ W <t: 0::: OJ CD W 0.. 0 0 0... (/) ~ f'-.. c > <.9 0::: L() f- ~ => '- a OJ OJ OJ W 0::: Z N 0 c c ..c W ---l I 0 x 0 x -0 l- LL CD ..c co ..c co (j) 0 L() f- o...LL o...LL '- <2: ---1 S o 0 o 0 0 f- 0::: ----- - f'-.. ZZ ZZ -"t:: 3: z ::J w N >- '- (() f- f'-.. f- 0 W <t: "--'" 0::: ill ill ~ ~ ~ (j) s ~ w c .. c .. OJ 0... oX oX :5 <2: 0.... W 0::: 0 ..c<( ..c<( 4- 0 0 <t: LL 0::: o...LL o...LL 0 0... c W ~ > W f'-.. 0 W ---l LL ~ -J 0::: CD 0 > w u L() 0. U W -.;t 0::: E (j) W I W 0 N Z 0 ~ > CD 0::: () LL 0 <( <t: L() 0 c 0 0 Z 0.... w ----- 0 0.. <( - ---l f'-.. :J 0 f- N W c >- f'-.. 0 c.9 Z 0::: "--'" (j) ~ I- z ::J >- w Z OJ - ~ z 0 0.. - Z ~ a 0 (/) U I c Z f- I w <( ...J co :J 0.. ...J C ~ a <( l+= 0.... f- co (j) (j) en 0 Z I'- I'- a.i OJ 0 w CD CD () :J I'- I'- C 0- --- 0 co 0('"") (j)0~ OJ '- Z :J '- OJ W z('"") wZ...J (/) C <(...J (/) m c . ,....., LL ...JLL <.9::iLL ...... ..c co .t1';i ttal';#'~ 0 (j) ~ 0:::- ...J (j) - E (/) E l~""fp?~ 0 w-O::: C w>-w :2:>-w '- >. ~ ~~\ '","Y-'~ 0 OJ OJQj <.9<J::f- <(f- 0.. : i' ~::- , ,.~tt'~ s ...Js<( (j)S<( ~ OlE ~--J,~..: '~I- ~ m:;::; _4-:, ,,"~/ ',:.\ ~OS wOS ---'tP~. ~, /~~ 0 (/) co ~ -0::: ...J-O::: 4- - ';.{;"" ,,~~ . OJ ..c .....+:<t'u....'tf. ~l 0 >-:2:<( 0::::2:<( .D L .~ ~,)7 CLt,.' o('"")w <(('"")w CIl 0 '#~III Ow =>('"")...J I('"")...J Ol C'l....:::: Ow -,('"")u 0('"")0 C o OJ E OLL () :;:0-0 ~~ C C.)- ClJ WX ClJ OJ 0 0.. ~('"") E 0.:= >. <x:~ E CIl'- .D :2: . EE-o ~N (j) ....0 ..J >-z '- '- () -cClJOJ ~9 en OJo ClJ -E' E-"t:: OJ o...!::: C .... '- .:: ClJ 6- O- f/) OJ 0 :JM >- wf- ~ OJ c: c..s :J..c ClJ cng <( =>8 0 0.. C'" f- '- 3i: w 0 0 0 OJ (j)o.... ..J co '- +:i z...... 0:::...... WN Cl ~(j) c 0... :s a.. -- MClJ ..-ClJ cnU 0 '- ~ o~ 0 ID~ ClJ c: co:2: ..-:2: <X:C c 0...... ..-...... M sO::: W - -0 ~ 0 0-0 '0 '0 UU M U !;;:Z !;;:Z M (j)0 a.. 0:::<( 0 ~ ~ <.0 N...J Orn I M> 0<( 03: NO U::E OM U~ >- cu CO "<:5 Q) II C 0 o 0 o Q) ~ :::2: c o ~ 'Uj o 0.. (/) o C'? C 0 o 0 WQ)~ 0. ro 8 EO <3 o o ::J Q) u~ Q) cu ..cO c75Q) :0 Q) ll~ Q) cu 0:::0 '-- Q) cnu WQ I-~ - 0 >s I- 0.. () 0 <(en w z o o ~ (/) c o u Q) Ul o 0.. U C cu ---- > OJ 0 C Z ~ 0 .~ ~.~ (j)S II 4- II llOllU 0Q)0Q) OEO::J Q) 0 Q) ~ ~ll~- :::2: -S:::2: (/) o is ~ 1:5 wuwg, z Cz (/) o g, 0 .~ 0,0 '-- OJ 0 .~ ~ C'? a5 C'? E o Q) 0 '-- oEoQ) N No.. --co-- "-oC'?::J ~oQO o__o..c "C"""-Q)~:!:::: ~ ~ C'? .~ C'? ~ o '--0 '-- OCUoQ) N>No.. __L__e ~.280.. __c__4- ~.Q ~ ~ ro Q) II E 0.. 0 0.. II cu Q) U cu E w (j) Q) ro KJ u II ~ ~~ w (/) II C C C ~ ~ ~ C~ e 22 Q) u C 0.. 0Q) 2 0 E 0... ~::J --- ~ g ~ Q) U C Z Q) cu I Q)U 0.. c(/)Q) Eo I .2: c :;:; c Q) o 0 II Q) II c():;:::::;Q)~Q) oog~2a: :';::;4-o..c ........ II ~ (/) .- ~ .~ Q)llcro~CU ~~=:e,go. .~ 0 .~ E 0... E Q):t= 0 a: c 0 . . 2- e:- m E E ::J (f) .2 c ~ E o I,S L C'? o o N C0 o <3 0:: w I- <( ~ 0:: <( W ..J U LL o >- I- - U co L() I"- C0 (f) C0 W <{ o 0 >(9n:: O::ZO W--1 (f) 0 LL. I----ln:: Z~W WOJ!;: ~(f)S~ o...Wn::LL OO<{ ---l>WI"- Wo::-1CO >WOL() W(f)w"'f O---l>~ O<(<{L() Zo...Wr:::- <(O~~ (9-0:::-- ZZ>-W -~~Z Z~IO Z I-I ::5 ::::>0... 0... 55 o o T""" co I"- L() -.::t I N CO L() jC' N I"- -- "''''-#1.,,, jl~l.~ VOllf'~ l~l""r. Q'ol~ '~\ "'-\)"":;. : ~- ~~- -',- ~cC; ~_~.~.-; , , :~u..i= t~~.: $~' ~'C"''''-. -,. ,.,~:: .<r1'" "(i"'-' , -:';i..fl" """tr-"/ -'.. ~ CL't,.. '4'#,,1 >- !l:::N <(it) ~g ~T"" :JM (J)O WO (J)N <(~ Uu.. r:0 r:0 r:0 ro~ Cl)- .~ (j) ;'"0 _ e (j) :J 0.. ....;- o () '- Cl) o..B - '- ..co... :5= ot;::: ~.E: Cl)ro "'Oz 'Cfj e Cl)~ ..c ,- _ (f) 0lCl) cO::: Ero ro (f) Cl) ro () - e Cl) Cl) e '+- :.= a5~ "0 '- o Cl) o 0.. 3: 2 _0.. 0- J2tn ,~ il5 (f):S ro :J 4- 0 ~~ 35 ro 4- Cl) '- '- ro Cl) Cl)..c e- wE ~~ 'E Ci5 '- Cl) Cl)4- o..:c C/) 0 Ol W ::: '(ii N (9 e OlW ....J Cl) e . wE:;:; N ~ o..roo o.~ ~ COa;E' >- > '- N o Cl) Cl) e ....J o:;,g !Q ~~~~ >- "0 "0 C/) 4: a ~ ~ 0 :5: C/) U5 u; (f) W -e Cl....J Cl)>..o ~-~:~ ~ ~~ 0. Cl) e o >< ..c ro o...LL o 0 ZZ Qj e .. oX ..c<( o...LL r-- w r-- r:0 r:0 ....J C/) LL WC/) . (9-0::: ....J>-w w<(r-- ~S<( coOS -0::: >-~<( Or:0w ::)r:0....J -:>r:0() '- Cl) e 3: o W ...J ro a. 25 o Cl):f:: W (5:g a. 0::: <( Cl) e o >< ..c ro o...LL o 0 ZZ Qj e .. oX ..c<( o...LL r-- w C/) ~ W r:0 (9 ....J ....J LL ~~ci O>-w <(r-- C/)w S 3S 0> ....J-O::: o:::~<( <(r:0W Ir:0....J ()r:0() ~ '- Cl) 0.. o '- 0... -- '- Cl) e 3: o (/) . ~ >-. OJ E E ::l (f) o C :::0 (j) E o ~ '-.: Cl) 0 0 :J 0 0 00 0 ~ ff7 ff7 e ro rn co "0 ro 0 0 0... 0 0 _ 0 0 coo :J.,- .,-eo ff7 ff7 E <( -+-' e :J o Eo 0 <( 0 0 "0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 (f).,- .,- (f) ff7 ff7 Cl) (f) en <( 2 o r-- ro :;:; e Cl) :2 en Cl) 0::: I "0 U5 >< Cl) LL N I.t') o O..J ~CJ) . >- Me:( 03: 00 N cn~ ..JM LL~ >. co W c o o c o :;::; W 'Vi Z o 0 ~ 0 o C"f) c 0 o 0 ~ W s:::! Q. ro :;:!: EO;:: o .,...- o ::l CJ) "Oro 1!o ~ CJ) C"f) o o N "P W (:i) a3 ro N cr: 0 25 ~ ,~ > (/) W wCC: CJ) ~en >~ ~~ <">0 <((f) c c W <.9 E o I- (f) :J E W "0 o ,S2 Z 'C: I.- CJ) .c (f) C"f) o o N (:i) N -- o "0 CJ) .~ CJ) <.) CJ) I.- c o ~ <.) 0. 0. <( (f) ::l E CJ) "0 o ,S2 Z 'C I.- CJ) .c (f) C"f) o o N (:i) N 25 (f) c W E E o o o cc: o CJ) c o W 2 c o o w Z o o C"f) o o N -- C"f) .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N -- C"f) N -- o ~ ,~ ~ > CJ) W S cc: wcCJ) cr: CJ) ~ OlE:J ,~ E ~ W 0 CJ) wocc: ,~ 0"0 OlZ C C CIl W ..J W W .0 <( -Y o 0:: w Z o o C"f) o o N N .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N -- N .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N (:i) N 25 W W .0 <( -Y <.) 0:: w Z o o C"f) o o N N .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N (:i) N 25 c o (f) I.- CJ) "0 C <( W c c CIl ::l o w Z o o C"f) o o N -- o .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N (:i) N -- o I.- CJ) ~ o c W "0 4: w Z o o C"f) o o N -- r-- N -- o C"f) o o N -- r-- N -- o C"f) o o N (:i) N 25 "0 ,0 ~ W aiCC: E >. E g2 o I.- <.) ::l o(f) Z W W l.- I- (f) ~ I-'~ ~ Z > CJ) w2~> u... c W 20lCJ)CC: ~2cEo ,~ 0 '0.. E W >OCllOCC: .Wo~006 Z-gg~ CIl CIl u.. ...J 0.. I.- CJ) :c <.) 0:: CJ) .0 .0 CJ) o w Z o o C"f) o o N (:i) .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N (:i) N -- o o .0 W ~ a:; c c W co w Z o o C"f) o o N (:i) .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N (:i) N -- o >. CJ) c c ::Z c o (f) CIl , w Z o o C"f) o o N 25 C"f) 25 C"f) o o N -- C"f) N -- o en CJ) ::l 0- W I.- CJ) (f) <.) (f) ai CJ) "-~ ~ c .8CJ) CJ) 2 --.: > CJ) Q.) c>cCJ)~o.. CJ)&CJ)cc:aiE EOlEQjEo EcE~Eo OWOCllo"- <.) <.) ~ <.) 0 o.S2 0 E 0 Qj z16z(sc:::: I.- ~ CJ) I- (f) ...J >. l.- I.- CJ) co C CIl >. I.- co W (f) (f) W CIl LL I.- CJ) .c ro CJ) I w Z o o w Z o o C"f) o o N -- L[) e .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N -- o .,...- -- .,...- .,...- C"f) o o N -- C"f) N -- o C"f) o o N (:i) N -- o ~ CJ) .~ ~ cc:Z _W 22 C2 CJ)0 ~o 20 ';;: Z c W 2- C ro E E ::J if) o C ~ E o ~ . e . CITY OF CLEARWATER Lo:\c RA,CE PIA:\NINC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PIANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MU:\ICIPAL SERVICES BUILDI:\C, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHO:\E (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 November 18,2003 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 333 MIDWAY ISLAND (FLS2003-10052) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 333 Midway Island, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The request is to permit a six foot wooden fence along the side (south) property line at 333 Midway Island and terminating eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line within the waterfront sight visibility triangle, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E.2. On December 4, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be December 4, 2003. The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application.. You may phone me at 727-562-4539 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review ofthe application. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting (December 4, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com or my direct email addressatbbelTy@c1earwater-fl.com. S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlStandard FlexlPending Cases!3 - Upfor the Next DRCIMidway IsI. 3333 - Melges (IEOD)!Midway Isl333 BRINi>flift-0hfibft'L~Pl3fffi)lb(! ISSIC ).r-.: IR IlmT H\\lILTO'\. Vlel ~L\Y( IR-CO\I\IISSIOc;IE WIIIT:'\I,y GEI\ C( J\I\IIS';IO'\IR FI!\:<h Hll\illlm. C( J.\I.\IISSIO,"I'.R * Bill Jc )c;S( 1'\, C( )\I\IIS'II I'\IR "FIJI AI. EMI'U ll'.\ENI ANI I AIFIR\l.\IIVI: AClI( IN hi i'U ))'11\" . . ,r~ l'o If l~'V .,J 1 ._ Jl. OF CLEARWATER LONG t{ANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PW\fNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR11.E AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLOPJDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 November 5, 2003 Mr. Charles and Judy Melges 333 Midway Island Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: Flexible Standard Development to permit 66 linear feet of a six foot wooden fence along the side (south) property line at 333 Midway Island and terminating eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E.2. Dear Mr. Melges: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to permit 66 linear feet of a six foot wooden fence along the side (south) property line at 333 Midway Island and terminating eight feet from the rear (southeast) property line and seawall, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E.2. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. Please provide the following: 1. An email address for correspondence. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2003-10052. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December 4, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4539. S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIStandard FlexlPending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DRCIMidway Isl. 3333 - Melges (IEOD) \Midway Isl 333 complete letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT !lAMILTOi'l, VICE ivLwORCOMMISSIONER WHITNEY GR'W, COMMISSIONER fRANI( HIBBARD, COMMISSIONEH BIuJm,SOr\, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFll{MATIVE ACTION EMPLO'yl'R"