FL00-01-03
~
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
ELEVATION SUBMITTAL
PREPARED BY
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
AND
DCSW,INC. ARCHITECTS
~~~ :LA~~~~:r~p~:~~
CASE TYPE rt 0,- J:t~./
DRC DATE J 2 lie\)
CDS DATE ((, 1- iY I ()V
SIGNATURE v ~ ~ C1 {(.
DATE U[Zi 10"')
FilE COpy
..
?
~
~
-
~
~
1
~
~'
f<."'.~;;'."'"
v:...~
J
~"TI
III
rJ
"
'"
-,
.
(
-
-u ;~U.J
r; ffl ~
I Z
j ~ "'T'\ 0 i r
z m
)cnGl co ffl
n m Qo N
2~o c..u ~
nom ~
>>m< ~
IJcnm
~ 5 ffl
.!:> -u
-{ ?;:
m m g
:D Z ~ ',,-..--J
~
"
\
C)
0-
\
o
/
o
\)J
I
1
.~
,A;'
l
.~ ~-- .. _~i
.. - ~ _-=.f ~
(,
..
.- ~ - --'" -.
1-_-_-...;..,...........-_-_-_.--._-_
I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
elllllll.
~
,
"I, Stucco-Color-:-th".ft
'StllCCO Accent, Col'or .~'L:riiH:r~,9.u"lit.ta
Column Colcrr . Moyoc<ran Bi'u"e
. Roof Tile . Sp':tniSh B:3rr~1 Til~. Coli1r . T~;"rQ~~'~1lI:l
5 Wrought Iron. Black
IWindow Glass. Smoke:PSlvei
Mid Point
Mechaniul ~
SI<J1lirljt Roof
16'.0"
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
-.---- ~
Moxh.\ni'.J1 O<.:,k
Str<.'<-t l"v,,1
14'~"
~"". Site G...~
I
I
I
I
I
Tower I
North Elevation
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
- - -
I
I ~'~
~,
I
I
I
:a l. t
I
i3 :II [J
I 33 l. IT
I tI ] I (f
::R II IT
I
88 D IJ ] I rr
r
I BEl c =B 31 II
I 88 0 ~ ] I II
BEl 0 tJ 11 (f
I
BEl (] :a ] . [J
~
aEB D 13 l.
BEl CJ j3 :lD
Str~l>t L"v~1
I
Tower I
I South Elevation
I OSCEOLA BAY CLUB Deli
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! I
~. _..
II! -..
~ -.
~ -.
., -.
~ -.
., ..
St~o~t Lev,,1
I Tower I
West Elevation
I
I
I
I
OSCEOLA BA.Y CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I 3.
I a~
I 11,.[ cc a .1 - .. II!.
I IE cc - .1 - . . I!
1-[ cc - .1 - .. I'!.
I
I E c c - .1 - .. I!. .
I 1-[ cc - .1- .. I!
I IE r:c - .1- .. I'!
I E cc - .1- .. I!
I
cc - .1- I
,-
- .1-
- .1-
Scr-eeC level
I Tower 2
East Elevation
I
I
I
I
OSCEOLA BA.Y CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
. .
-Mech.tniul De<k
I~'.Q
I,
I I
~
DD all
.. B-L<
-.. ~
_III, 911
..~ 33l
..... ~
_.~ :a
..~ :a
..~ rB
--~~
~1II~g
-.
I Stucco Color. Buff
2 Stucco Accent Color - Light Terra-cotta
J Column Color - Moroccan Blue
4 Roof Tile - Spanish Barrel Tile. Color - Terracotta
5 Wrought Iron. Black
6 Window Glas5 . Smoked Blue
Tower 2
North Elevation
SO'~
....,
1
-
I
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DCim
I
I
I
I
I
I
rEB~, "-
I ~EB ~~~
I r EB ~~
I
~ 63 ~~
I : EB ~~~
I ~ E8 ~~~
I ~ EB ~~~
~~
~~
~
\
-~~
II II.
lfa II'
II II'
181'1' I
I~ II.
liB II'
lIB II'
II I J .
,
St''''d Lev",1
I
Tower 2
I South Elevation
I
I
I
OSCEOLA PAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCro..r Lev..1
Tower 2
West Elevation
OSCEOLA BA.Y CLUB
I
.1
.1
.,
.1
.1
.1
DC.
4,.
...
Osceola Bav Club meetin2 notes
As you will recall from last month's discussion, there were concerns raised about the landscape
plan, architectural elevations and the height of the proposed buildings. The applicant has revised
plans addressing those concerns.
Site plan
Again, the proposal includes the redevelopment of the site with 150 condominium units within
two towers, with a request for 45 du/acre. Staff reviewed the plan based on the goals of the
Periphery Plan, the site characteristics and surrounding land uses, with the assumption that the site
would be rezoned in the future from the HDR District to the Downtown District.
Refer to site plan
In terms of site plan changes, they are fairly small involving a minor shift of the buildings, a
change in the footprint of the buildings and change in the central circulation area. The access
points, parking, and amenities remain the same.
4',-.~"<
The landscape plan has been significantly modified, exceeding the requirements of Code, which
includes a mixture of various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals. An irrigation plan has been
included.
Right of way vacation
The request to vacate the Osceola Avenue right of way has changed somewhat. The new plan no
longer includes a request to vacate seven feet of ROW along the west side of Osceola in front of
the buildings. The area in front of300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere Apartments) is being vacated
and conveyed to those owners. There is another small area to be vacated and conveyed to
Osceola Bay Club. The realignment of the road is the still part of the proposal, whereby the
applicant will be dedicating ROW to the City, and through movement, northbound will be
maintained on Osceola Avenue.
Renderings
The changes to the elevations, generally, include a curved wall on the east elevation, the use of
extensive windows and balconies on both the east and west elevations, and more neutral color
stucco. The Mediterranean-style is being maintained with greater architectural details and a more
unified appearance.
The City retained the services of Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe architects to assist in the review and
redesign of the buildings. John Toppe is here to address the modifications.
Height
The buildings have been reduced by one floor, now at 14 stories. When staff evaluated this new
design, we recognized that it is something between a flat roof and a pitched roof The applicant's
architect redesi~ned the ~d~g so th~t the ~op .?\.!he living units measured no more ~han 164
feet. He also tned to ~t tIte mechamcal umts, W~l~ are on top of the living space, WIth some
architectural detail. In doing so, he created an enclosure around the units with sloped roof that
measures 174 feet to the midpoint of the pitch on the roof as measured from the mean elevation
Page 1
t
of existing grade to the top of the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or midpoint of the
peak/eave of pitched roof). Staff is supportive of J 64 feet in height. This is based on the J 50-
foot maximum permitted in the Downtown District for sites which front on the harbor, plus credit
for the J 4-foot mean elevation.
I
! .,t
10
,
---
: e s>>
Summary (final picture)
Staff recommends approval ofthe project, again, because:
· it will set a new standard for the area;
· It reflects the City's vision for the Downtown District; and
· it will improve the area character of area and promote the private sector investment
Downtown;
V Staff suggests the following conditions:
.(., y,/ 1)
/ \ \.
QJ)vfl!: ~~'"
'> 'v~'n )\9: 11))
.hI)
'\ n.~7 3)
\: t / '1 4)
/0
\9 5)
6)
7)
That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission and
relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised application to be
submitted);
That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation to the top of the living units, and not to exceed 174 ,tp th.e midpoint of
the peak roof enclosing the mechanical units; ~
That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
That the buiding permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the Cdb;
That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
That conditions 1-3 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
Additionally, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of Georgia Street. A separate motion is requested. That recommendation
will be forwarded to the City Commission for final disposition. (Mike Quillen, the City Engineer,
is available to answer questions related to the engineering issues including the street vacation.)
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 meeting notes. doc
Page 2
I
r=-- -
'/ ---
i
I
I
-----
.L'iI'illI.LS VIOlIOHO
~~
;S~
~3
00
g
o
w
w?:i
!%l~~
QO-J
~oO
~~~
00:5
ZWO
~5~
Xoi(W
\v
I
I
I
II
I..
Ii
I
I
i
i
OFL-- (fD - Ot -0.3
~ok P>>vl LtuJ)
oll')Gl/l ~><--d @ ~D 0
u /7-0' cJ))
~
Ii
II
1
~!.!lI~S lVI~
j
iJ
I
!
a
M
!
J J
-
.-
----
--------
I~
L-::
I
i I
II I
t
.
I
I
I
II
"
,
,
\
\
...
.\A .\A
Co C
~ r-
t' v
+-
~HS:lI~S SHNOI
fL,OD/0l,02.
~ ,,--p~ U~
t1('i.~hl ~ 6D~ lJ f.Ul I ()lJ
-
.,..1111-
- - - - - - - - - - J
-~~-::!!- -::...--~-....-=--:s..v'
l'
'z
jI---7
0311V1dNn
:J
~
j ,
I
&I
j
llVID1IOH:D
,.
I
I
1:1
~
I I
1:1 I
'?
DNIDII'II
.m:a
I
I
I
.
lit
j ~,' o,.,,,,!"I '...
t. e \
[JU
.~--
S'ilNOr
.tau
.
.
~
,....
Osceola Bav Club meetin2 notes
The site is 3.4 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, generally on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. Although it is currently zoned High Density Residential District, it has an
underlying land use of Central Business District, and there is the expectation that it will be
rezoned to Downtown District within the next year.
Development within the Central Business District is governed by the 1995 Redevelopment Plan.
Areas on the perimeter of the Redevelopment Area are regulated by the supplemental Periphery
Plan. The site is located within the northwest periphery area which recognizes that the site is
underutilized and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan encourages high-rise residential use
along the Clearwater Harbor (appropriate to allow tall residential structures to promote the
scenic views of the Harbor).
Staff evaluated the proposal based on a combination of the HDR and Downtown District
standards and the redevelopment goals of the Periphery Plan.
Site Plan
The proposal includes the redevelopment of the site with 150 condominium units within two
towers. The request for 45 du/acre will provide high density residential units that are vital to
support the emerging redevelopment effort of downtown Clearwater.
The project will be accessible through a gated entrance/exit along Osceola Avenue. Two levels of
underground parking will be provided. Exits are provided along Georgia Street from the parking
garage.
The site plan includes many amenities including pool, spa, tennis courts, and docks within the
harbor. The applicant has committed to exceed the requirements of the Landscape Code. As
submitted, however, the landscape plan will need to be further refined/detailed to accomplish this
goal. Staff and the applicant have been discussing options for landscape buffers along the Osceola
Avenue right-of-way in front of the site. Staff is supportive of a plan that includes both private
and public property (with the understanding that the costs for installation and maintenance will be
borne by the developer).
Renderings
The architecture of the buildings will be Mediterranean in style (as shown on the renderings) with
a stucco exterior and clay roof tile. The design incorporates a lOa-foot space between the towers
that helps preserve a view to the water.
The buildings will be 15 stories or 179 feet as measured from the mean elevation of existing grade
(to the top of the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or midpoint of the peak/eave of pitched
roof). Staff is supportive of 164 feet in height. This is based on the ISO-foot maximum permitted
in the Downtown District for sites which front on the harbor, plus credit for the 14-foot mean
elevation.
Second rendering - from harbor
ROW vacation map
Page 1
- .
ROW vacation map
The request also includes the partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-of-way
between Jones and Georgia Streets. The area to be vacated is shown in solid blue and the area to
be added, as part of the realignment, is shown in hatched blue.
Osceola Avenue currently provides access to the Belvedere Apartments at 300 Osceola Avenue.
The applicant has been working with representatives from 300 Osceola Avenue since the staff
report was distributed. A written agreement has been submitted which provides the owners of the
Belvedere apartments all of the right-of-way to be vacated in front of that property.
ROW vacation map (site plan)
With the vacation request, through movement will be maintained on Osceola Avenue - as shown
on the map. The proposal also provides for a left-turn lane from Jones Street to Osceola Avenue.
Summary (final picture)
Staff is supportive of the project because:
· The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design will set a new
standard for the area;
· It reflects the City's vision of urban character within the Downtown District; and
· The development will improve the character of area and promote the private sector investment
Downtown;
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code.
Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the Osceola
Bay Club, subject to the 8 conditions as outlined in the staff report, with modifications to
j~~t\ <. condi,tions 1 and 4, (provide to, members) as follows (for the record): /L;(U
.:>I.. [--vlt., N,,~ -.. '1w ~ u<i1...o;:b-..... u.~~
\zvA \..~~ 1) That Osceola Avenue right-of-way be maintained north ofJones Street, dJacent to
?c0s k~t 300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere apartments) be vacated and ed to the
I. l'lAt'. I l~ owners of300 Osceola Avenue (with a revised site plan to be submitted);
?\.'0liJ ,\ '71 1i~~^S) That the balance of the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City
G l~.. :.. I'. ( l." . &l Commission and relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised
.,k c~ os. ,t.\..\ . I
'~v"^ ' . r application to be submitted);
~ 3) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
~L:" ~ elevation; .QK{(}.uL..
<. ~? 10,14 J ~ That the landscape plan be further refined and detailed to~e requirements of
n.~~0..' -~ C; Code, including a minimum IO-foot buffer along all street frontages, prior to the
,M.liV~ \.....\.,C issuance of any permits, including the Osceola frontage which will include both
t-A--li~ proiect and right-of-way property to be approved by Planning and Engineering
?e~)VV' - ~lfJ) . U~( staff; to be paidfor and maintained by the developer
L~ wv.J: 5) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
. /'~~ 1i;..V' "';v': 6) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
J:x:uls.. Harbor;
7) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
Page 2
-.... ...
8) That conditions 1-5 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
Additionally, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, from Jones Street to Georgia Street. A separate motion is requested. That
recommendation will be forwarded to the City Commission for final disposition. (Mike Quillen,
the City Engineer, is available to answer questions related to the engineering issues including
the street vacation.)
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 meeting notes. doc
Page 3
.'~ l/ A
1f 'Iii \ (l,C"Vr/", .. ,)J,;(y\). .'
. " 1 (l('/I"~~ ,,-, A Ii
-r ., . " 1 '\ ' . ' flU- "'-=7J. '- i"'V+-' I.
'f<; fI,[ii t u-c.L fA ' ,~';1UV "i ,'C '>>t>t,U.. p l~; ( ~!0Yl1.l;za!;.-ll,#eji ~&..b ) · -
~ JMLt~~;.f~~'\10~d '
o r>>0 ttU;QU\'. (j [1.,ltLI-+#c1. . ~ iJt pJ.~~; ~J "' J,t<kJ;. 1;0/-,""
/ 1t;1 V' t,~..,) ,vJ...<:..c m i)!..tL "\ . Iv ,'4" r; /v.../ ~.... /1 - - . ~'- A. /lh )'
1. . L () ,/". ,t4 Y'~,/Vlrr- !'
(j.MJ'/~ ~~ ' Ii .:,-.d~ I'v..)/<,' ~ ;'/." ,":J1Y...:t f~/trl-... - 76.kp~';' ~/,,-d<...
> J.</ -,f' .^-..-l t')....L .....n:iv.) .tY I .l-
'll. lat. S"lA.? J'./.. V'" [, /1' (; . D ,'" f"" l1v~
~ ~~J.t^ 6~U\) c\. t
f 1 ICl-T'IIt. i ~ --(I t V 1~' I / ~ L'J /;UU--v i!. ivo ?c ,; h. ..'f zl fo tilt '# ~ /I ,1 . J1.
(} ," :' ..", 1 J .- I' cc",,<,C"~
J n. " ' , . I~ " " - · .. ~ /J I ,'-" ..
04-' ~ r w :1"( Itc r .I aA"c l,') \.L.~-v' ~,hL" ~"..&,., "v..<.... '
, h ,-f// _ ';'ii,..t/I.','f-'\IAi:.9': /lJ,Af.l.-<<., tt./) :Jvk~-.l ,~.,
(iV, ~f ['w;j'LI'j /' I r" <
~u if A tu: -Ivy.. ,
('ll t4. du.'-{ , iiJ Ii.. J1;\A uv;:., ixl.v.{ (10 'f I? f u..u .0..... I '-'. l '" ~.'?,c&,v" ,< 't--
I 1..1 J I
Otl.-v,l tv i\lj)! t'.? (V/~1 nh h"Vl
? \; O,e ,11' 'tl"J 1"" sri j I J'" dill' iJJ if /0 f4.<{ t' ~r ',,ilDQ;J(J
I (,~~
&h~ 1 ~u r /..., (,,(ll,lop M~ (,1 "'J 6d'''''- 6r 1 '","i4f<.<rb.J)
I ~ 11"'" cJM sfl P I 0" J
" " ' ' I l{,..~.1 - H r Vn hlM ,
1../ r,,\..{r"J..,-IM. .T;J~ ).A~ q~ 1'1-0
U >iV> j)<.'-<V\ fI.& y 1/ J'L f' led (, (.1../ 'r1~ ( ....J4
(L) 17") f) _ ()~ 1 C.""/} u.. · J I) - v "
l'VvDT-L f ,If; r,( tL~
I
'22 iL 6uO.t{ {LJ~ ~
" . -t ^ I!' e <-(.1- '-1 if-LtLj
I'V-A/ j'1) u 0
,,5t ( bf-cli- Y /.
1Cl25U/L~~vJ
l\j ffiZ (() 1(lf-1~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
Ac.
tEl..
g)
I
~ m (] c - == -
~ m o [ - .-
I
~ m c c n ~ D
~ m c; c .. ~ .. It
~ m o c -- ~ D
I. m cc .. ~ II
I~ m oc n ~ D
I fH [I[ - ~ ..
~ IE u c - ~ D
J m cr -- ~ H
III (j C q ~ D
OJ L C ~
I
I Tower I
I East Elevation
I
I
I
~t,.ot L....'
OSCEOLA BA.Y CLUB
DC.
I-~tucco C;ol"or":'""trutt
. Stucco Accent C;,?lor "'L1ih~IT'(,u.,.ac:ad:t
Column Color -MorocCi"iln B1tr@
Roof Ti Ie. Sp an ish B':lrr;rlTile, CoJ(fr" " 'T~:I''''J;t~tt:l
5 Wrought Iron - Black"'"
IWindow Glass - Smoked 'BI,ue ~
Mid Point
Mechanical ~
Sloping Roof
16'.0"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mo:<hankal Do:<k
~
" ~
.~.-~' " 't'~~ i.,; ,~: :",
II rI.
II rI"
II ~w
150",0' II ~:'
II ~;:'
I rI.
II t'I'~. 1
. ~~. l
II t'!; 1
I rI"
II ~_:
Street Le",,1
14'~"
Me..", Site Cnlck:
I
I
I
I
I
Tower I
North Elevation
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DC~
I
I ~"J
I
I
I
. :E JI f
I
II 33 III (J
I II j3 JI (J
I II il :II ff
I 33 JI rr
I
BEl 0 II 13 ] I (f
r""
I 88 t:I II 1] ]1 rr
I 88 Cl . :a :J I IT
BEl [] I il J I (J
I
88 Cl II :B ] I If
~
BB Cl II 33 :II I
88 c . Ii JD
StroH't Level
I Tower I
I South Elevation
I OSCEOLA ~y CLUB DC_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Tower I
West Elevation
I
I
I
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
-.
-..
-.
-.
-.
-.
-.
OS C EOLA BA.Y CLUB
DC.
----
-
I
I
I
I I '
~ I
I i
I D, I I
I
I :J,.~ cc a .1 - .. I!!.
I I E c c - .1 - . . II
1-[ cc - .1 - .. Ii!
I I E cc - .1 - .. I!
I I-E c c - .1 - .. .!
I IE r:c - .1 . .. _!
-
I E cc - .1 - .. I!
I
. cc - .1 -
- l1li1 -
- .1 -
Street level
I Tower 2
East Elevation
I
I
I
I
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.~~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.. .. W.l
-Mechanical D&k
~
liD 81.
.. rn-L/
...~
.- ~,
..~ 3~
_.~ :a
_.~~
..~ ::3
..~ 53 ~
__~ 33
.... 53
-.
I Stucco Color. Buff
2 Stucco Accent Color - Light Terracotta
J Column Color. Moroccan Blue
4 Roof Tile - Spanish Barrel Tile. Color - Terracotta
5 Wrought Iron. Black
6 Window Glass. Smoked Blue
Towe r 2
North Elevation
SO'~
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ·
~63
~EB
.
rEB
.E9
.
r B3
..
If- EE
.
r 63
.
- EEl
'5rr~L..t L.....v<,.1
.~~~
e
~
I
~~~ ""
~~.
". ~~
~~~
~iJI~
~~~
~~
~.
I
Tower 2
I South Elevation
I
I
I
L~
IfB II ~
I~ II-
II II-
IfB II" II
I !II 1'-
IBilII-
IfD II.
II II-
I II ·
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
Deii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
Str"cr L<lv,,'
I
Tower 2
I West Elevation
I
I
I
OSCEOLA BA.Y CLUB
Dei};
" .~ ~J
:i
u
w
:::;: .!MI
IJ... I ......
0 I <
0 0=:
0=:
Cl I'
z
a:
0 -! I
......
(f) Ish
..-
a. tjl
0 !.
~ :h
~
<0
.- ~GoI
_ k.
~~
~...9
-'-
w
u
<
a.
(f)
l1
:c
u
w
:::;:
~
00=:
wo
(f)..-
0<
a.>
Ow
0=:......
a.w
t
.
I
.
,,,--
SllNn 9NIN1 dO JOJ. OJ.
NOU. V^;I1;1 .u~:?Jd NV;lW t.lO~d
~
..-I
<
z
<
m
<
u
~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ m ~ ~ ru ..-I
~~
0=:
o
o
It'=!
0)
ON
Z......
5~
O=:w
(:)......
;INOZ ~;IJ J.H9f;JH 9Q-,g XV\.!
~
0=:
W
a.
oe
If:t
z>
<w
LJ W......
> :::;:w
<
<
......
o
w
u
en
o
z
o
l-N
U
~~
.-
II
c
CO
'"'
.-
U~
l-(f)
<(0:::
2W
W$
IO
Ul-
(f)
w
......
<
u
(f)
FL. OD ,0l-,0'3
O~(.olt:t BtL, ~
O(4lIA/j;c:..&' j..-k;. CDt-
Ltrl2-ol ()V
J..--
J',J-.,))", '1/', 1 C::r' 'i',,; , ;,
r ;b~t; l{~~
" 110 Ii ,;
/~,t'"'V\. /C.lLA :', 1"\/\..-
'> '" L.
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
c. ',,0i"'r!'
- )_l'~_-::-
---'::J' C~, -~Z;Il~ 0CI) 10. OXUl4. (12 ui1it>)
, ,L Ul
June 20, 2000
FL 00-01-03
Bl
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADM
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
REPRESENTATIVE:
LOCATION:
REQUESTS:
PLANS REVIEWED:
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
Kenneth H. Roush
400 Jones Street
· Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 174 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dw~lling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and~permit a six-foot fence within the front setback
along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street,
and
· Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
Site plan and site survey submitted by N orthside
Engineering Services, Inc.
3.33 acres (including right-of-way proposed to be vacatecij- (J.,v~
3.24 acres (without right-of-way) v..-vtv\rw~J')\I1.4
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
~
Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast corner
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
East Portion of the Site: 150 feet by 155 feet::!=
West Portion of the Site:522 feet by 320 feet::!=
Page 1
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate VICInIty IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
UPDATE: (,/ I .',' J ( ,
I
This case was discussed at length by the Community Development Board at its May 16, 2000
meeting, The Board continued the case to enable the applicant to finalize the elevation plans and
landscape plan. The applicant has submitted revised plans including amended building elevations
(with a lewcr building.--height), revised landscape plan, and minor site plan changes with an
adjustment to the vacation of right-of-way request. The application also includes approval of a
six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Georgia Street and Jones Street
The City has retained an architect (Harvard Jolly Clees T oppe) to review and assist in modifying
the design. ~5dtf)I~r0 '1 f\ ~ k ~,i/iLU
* 1)...(,'ltvu..Y> Claluit' c,/;Ww..t (](jyUlUJlVU
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.33 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Page 2
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 ofthe Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
· Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
· Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
· Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
· Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification (instead of the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category of CBD).
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
Based on the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current HDR zoning district, the site
characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff believes that the site is appropriate for
high-rise residential development. In determining the appropriate density for the site, the staff
was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future
density in the City should be located downtown where land and infrastructure are available.
Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical component of an economically healthy
full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central Business District is 70 units per acre in
approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the remaining center section from Myrtle
Page 3
Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units per acre. The transition from the
City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density proposed by the Osceola Bay
Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
areas will be the Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within twoJc':4~ towers. Two levels of underground parking will be
provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated entrance/exit.
Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking garage.
':?
The Mediterranean ~rchitecture of the buildings wilUnclYde _Il~!l1ral...colorstucco, blue vertical
colurrms--ancr~~~_ arc~ The east elevation of the towers incorp~raTe~- a curved wall design. F-al ~Q
Both the eas..t...... a.......~~w.. ..est.~leyl!.tjo.......lJs....jn.... chtq~ ~xt. ..~fl~iV.. e....... ',\Ii.n. . dows alld balconie~. ~ terracotta cOlor. -I-xY~
clay r~ft~e h(l~Lbeen-d..esigneclJQJIDnimi~~_ vi~-'~7s""()ft?e mechanical equipment and incorporates 1lwt ~ ifitt
the use of cupola-type enclosllres. e ~ &! lP]~
'\ The site plan includes a drive-thru canopy near the entrance between the two buildings. Ifrs
:designed with the similar tile roof treatment to match the buildings. The design as proposed
~ncorporates a 100-foot spacebet",eenthe towers that helps preserve a view to the water. The
~~~osed amenities indudeterulls courls~p60Is~-anQ.spa-:-"'"
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. T.he landscape plan has been revised and exceeds the requir~ments of
Code. This includes a mixture ofvarIolisTiees~'slirubs, paIins"ari11aniiuals:-'- '
Q
'The Residential IOOll Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
Ii from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
,\;'\- (/. ~idpoint. of the peak/eave of the main pitched roof The HDR I?is~rict permit.s up to 1~0 fe~t for
C \.A;" SItes whIch front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown DIstnct (to which the SIte Will be
lev \ rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for
1...174 feet which includes 164 feet from the ~an elevation to the top of the living units, plus ten
I. ,feet of mechanical area. 1~ t)ttUVJ (I\.l j it})
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre (150 dwelling units).
rThe applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
-\ ! between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
G/ of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating the portion of the road
Page 4
just north of Georgia Street, in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. That portion will be conveyed to
the owners of the Belvedere Apartments. The southern third of the road between Jones and
Georgia Streets will be realigned and through movement will be maintained. A portion of the
subject property will be dedicated to the City as right-of-way for the realignment of the road.
Final lane alignments and widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor along Georgia Street shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to
meet current engineering standards.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING
PERMITTED
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units
units units (50 du/ac -
Peri he Plan
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
dwelling Yes
(45
150
units
du/ac
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
Page 5
B. FLEXffiILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 145,055 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.33 acres
with right-of-
way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 174 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue -.3 feet
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 10
minimum feet; North
(Georgia Street
- 15 feet)
PARKING 1.25 space/unit 15 spaces 190 spaces Yes
SPACES (188 spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.665 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The Residential Infill Project use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
C. FLEXffiILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CRD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
project height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 174 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
Page 6
~
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Infill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
Page 7
~
The City retained an architect to review the proposed design changes that were introduced
at the May 16, 2000 CDB meeting. The City's consulting architect has worked with staff
and the applicant's architect to modify the roof treatment and the east elevation design.
The proposal, as amended, is well articulated with unified elevations (especially east and
west) and coordinated architectural elements.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
Page 8
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a 100-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The site plan and elevations have been amended to include a request for 174 feet in total height
for the two towers. The Planning Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet.
It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks will be required pursuant
to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not constitute approval of the
docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROV Al--.9f Jh~lexible Development application of the
-- ~. ", ---........ ---.-..-.---..-----.--....--..-....--,...,.,...-..-----.--.-.--- ,..,.-....-.....-..-..-.
-.9sceol~.Club,subject.1QJh~_JQl1.<:>win("s~~~~<?~ditions:
1) That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission and
relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised application to be
submitted);
2) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation;
3) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
Page 9
4) That the building permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the CDB;
5) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
6) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
7) That conditions 1-3 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Georgia Street. Final confirmation of the utility locations may
require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The
Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to resolve this issue prior to
review of the vacation reques~\ by the City Commission. t.-
o . I,) ~ /J\ 1)& '"' ~o
. . ,.<!f)( tJ I \ . \
Prepared by: Lisa L. Fierce: (>~J i) G /V '
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
\IMS2\PDS\Planning Department\C D BlC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola Condos\Osceola 400 STAFF
REPORT final. doc
Page 10
OSCEOLA
,..... '* !It
,... J ,"
, --
BAY CLUB ~
LUX U R Y
(~ 0 N D 0 M I N I U M S
A MATRIX LODGING DEVELOrMENT
CLEARWATER FLORIDA
Ms. Lisa Fierce
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, Florida
33758-4748
May 14,2001
RE: Site plan/Development order/CBD approval (Case # FL 00-01-03) extension request.
Dear Lisa,
Pursuant to a recent phone call with Ralph Stone I am sending you this formal request to
extend our site plan approval for the "Osceola Bay Club" luxury condos. As you know
we are fully intending to complete the project and are going through design changes of
the building based on extensive market research on what condo owners are looking for in
a project such as ours. Thank you in advance for you assistance in this matter. If you need
to reach me for any reason please call my cell phone at 727-804-1417.
Respectfully,
/
- ')
Richard S. Trela
President
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
,
: _J t
MAY 1 { 2001
cc: Ralph Stone
Gerry Ellenburg
Bill Home
ft OO-(!){-OE
OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC
519 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 103 CLEAR. WATER., FLOR.IDA 33755
TEL (727) 446-3000 FAX (727) 461-0670 WWW.OSCEOLABAY.COM
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Richter, Debbie
Monday, August 07, 2000 1 :33 PM
Fierce, Lisa
RE: osceola bay club
Not yet. Haven't heard from him since 6/15. He still needs to provide verification of figures before we can do a final
calculation of the fees due.
:-)Deb (562-4817)
-----Original Message-----
From: Fierce, Lisa
Sent: Monday, August 07,20001 :12 PM
To: Richter, Debbie
Subject: osceola bay club
did you ever receive payment for the parks and rec fees from rich trella? i wont issue the development order until he
pays.
....
..
August 7,2000
Mr. Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
304 South Belcher Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: Development Order regarding case FL 00-01-03 at 400 Osceola Avenue
Dear Mr. Roush:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.7 of the
Community Development Code. On June 20, 2000, the Community Development Board
(CDB) reviewed the application for Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Proj ect, with 1) an increased height from 30 feet to 174
feet, and 2) an increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50 dwelling units per acre
permitted in the Periphery Plan); and permit a six-foot fence within the front setback along
Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street, and partial vacation and relocation of
Osceola Avenue right-of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Board found that the proposal
is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, the
maximum development potential standards, transfer of development rights criteria and all
other applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community
Development Board granted approval of the applications with the following conditions:
D That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission
and relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised
application to be submitted): need to revise site plan for file as of 8. 7.00
2) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the
mean elevation to the top of the living units, and not to exceed 174 to the
midpoint of the peak roof enclosing the mechanical units;
3) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
sent email to debbie riehter 8. 7. 00
Af/f
Development Order
August 7,2000 - Page 2
4) That the building permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the CDB;
5) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to
Clearwater Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
6) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
and
7) That conditions 1-3 be met to the satisfaction of staff prior to the issuance
of the Development Order.
The Community Development Board also made a recommendation to the City
Commission for approval of the Osceola Avenue right-of-way vacation which has since
been approved by the Commission.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval and all required certificates of occupancy shall be
obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
Please remember that building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the
construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please contact Lisa Fierce,
Development Review Manager 562-4561.
Very truly yours,
Gerald Figurski, Chairman
Community Development Board
Cc: Richard Trela
\'MS2IPDSlPlanning Department\C D BlFLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 Development
order. doc
lEI
i
U - ~
: ""'-
f
~
U
III
D
I}
o
Ii L\
D
.,
'"'
'1
"
,
U Iii
~
IIlI
';.....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..--- - r" ._, . r ,- " - '
i '\ lr'''; Ir' Ir---~ I..~ I ,.-..:
:lri [)} :~-. :~c:';~~_u: - .. ,,:\\:
\"j . ~'I\V I Q 2000 '........ ..J/:
ll. ./ '
l I ~~--~ ~
L--.-.. ..,-...-. - .
PLA.NNING F.. DEVELOPM:':~~T
SERViCES
CITY OF CLEAHWMER
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
ELEVATION SUBMITTAL
PREPARED BY
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
AND
DCSW, INC. ARCHITECTS
May 17,2000
FILE COpy
Norlhside
&~ SewUu 1~,
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
Building Materials Key
1. Stucco Color - Buff
2. Stucco Accent Color- Light Terracotta
3. Column Color- Moroccan Blue
4. Roof Tile- Spanish Barrel Tile, Color- Terracotta
5. Wrought Iron - Black
6. Window Glass- Smoked Blue
Date: 5/17/2000
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
NESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 .2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
\'1
,
~
)
'\
~\
~
L
\\
"
~
~
-1.
~
\~
(
\\\
s-.....a. _'" _
.>
I
PSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
ut
>
S
4
2
~
\L
, .
L
\
~i
~\L
L
~
tt
\L
-1
\U
'-.,
/fr_
I
pSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
\\l
>
{
{
-1
}
\}
\l'
~
L
J
\L
\-
~
\L~
I
~)."
1
\1'-
-~
\.
/'
J
pSCEOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tp -"7~ J::- r !....IN ~[...
I
...!'
..!!
".'
..
.......
'''-11' ,,~ " r I .
r11p 1->( ~-cc-$
--~
f
I' i ~Ii J t
! f/ ~~ !' . t~.4-i'- -i~~~. e.~~~
I
, c
~/! ~.::'<*~,. fL t::- L..t;:;:.~ =- l4'. 0 tI .= I~\.$ ~ j; !,. ;
!
.~ e::::' J
. IT~
~"") .A. ""Cj)
...-.;.t (;e" I
~~C;:EOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.11~~~
t'iC-'" ,-- I or I
ioWF rz...
E,~C::EOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'"
1
. .._~ .
...
I
.
.,
..,.,
."
.w
---
!./ r?'
-'- ...: ~~
"":I<;lO'-'!....:.......=.., ---
l
~r-C? w r-~ I
E~~EOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I r '.' . EE EB[]'
I
I
I
I -
I
I
I
\
, ,
'., EE . EE IT1.;
. .
. .,.EE EE ' [IJ
.'EE EB
EE EEl CD .
EE Ea, .~,
EEl EEl IT]
~l'~r11-
-10 Nf"" IL.-
I
~---.u.. ~'....
~~C;:EOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~II
II
I
r ~l"'l-1ouc,.e t.ql~
, , / lJh.JIl-Jt7o!rl4j2klL.<PHY I
, ,', I I ' ",
\ ......, ~ I. C-=:;, II I
I I - ffi
.fD \;~r', ,'C?coF" \f-
~,.",'
~
:1
. .i~! EE
., j" ..", ", EE
,. . ~ 1~ #
, , ~ I '
~,mJ!!""".EE
i
! ;'_ , , EE
~ '
,- ~
..' II; .. i,~
"~nli. - .,~
m"iMJl~ .;:~
-IRI-'l ... :,11I
.~.Il, -:m
'I
.~.I~.,-,:m
I ' ,
---If ,,~_.,,~
~
l~~r r~~T2. ~
~ll r.:;~N 1~ E. !....e. v.:::. Itl~ I ~ 0 :r :=
r-h
'-J.,J
,~-?~ ~l,.., C'.>O, I
I?w~~EOLA BAY CLUB
DCII
I
I
I
I
t;:?f-j-
PiZo pO? ~ 0
~J l'r-H::;b V'l 6"-!....,
/0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
@
I
I
I
I
@
'~/Z.1M
I~~~\~
2.-
I
3!'-~~~
I
I?\N~~EOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:,P. -- ..-1-:"11 I ~ ~-rI ~
~~~ \, ! c..-;'N~-IC:- ~
t ~~~~ .____....---.
E,~~EOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ;..... ".. . .', . ~ ,-h~
I "Ea': ".;; 111:;
1",;'i'!:'!5" "~ "-< ,,~,~._~ ~~
I ,EE,,:-:,III-.~l:_;"_,:
I ~l:EJ';_'I~.':.:,
1 ::.:m:', .>,:~I.,~~ '_~_"'i:; 'it,:',
,. ". . . ",," IIIIJlt ~ IImi1r 0
I I ;:/;EEii:~~~~IIIiIIII~IIIiPI'~~
,~/:'<r..:} t-~' <:'i~{'IIII1I:;~~~t~:
;"';:::'m,;";-t:,~ :;"III-"~' ';"'.,
I ,:~,:' '< ~ , ;~?l:;: ~~! :~f..,-~t,
-t'<':"'/::83>~'(i.~.t:,.." . "'~~:~~." :~;-.".,....:\' "'v;~"
).: :; r.. ...._ "
r' ~ ......- -Ie 'i"', -}iT .'" ..:.'
I I ~ .~." :. ," . ~::;'<> Ii :~,~ .!":.
...w.... ,f.i " I \~"'M 'Ii '-"~fl'.. JP/"A- .r,,:. . ...' ~I- '. ":....:;;;:0;.:.-. '.1 'J .:-~. J'J .
,':,<:-;.,.:EB;;~;:~~ t~~ T~'~~
l"~:," ....\. . I, .:~'IIIIJlt.~i~I.r.:~.:~
'I ;11~..~(: ~'~- i'-"':':1:. ,;':':" ~. <l J ',.;; t ., ~.!.,/ -'t' l~ ," t't'~'
I ". -. mOl"" ~i-'_~"_~~
. .: II :)~'t J \ ll~ ~.:'? .}~ . >~z
, ' , ,( ," . ff
I ~.'::"EH,.,';..\,_~.;i;
"~'j':'EE",,:,;~'ilB" "...', .....c... ,,:~.;,:
....' ' :. :~. ,~(;
,0':0,0""
I t", '0,;" .... . """:!
I
I
/_~~-j
- r...~F--~I.) ~1"'loo~ 1 ~~~t-l r
.~.'~~
't'
..d~
41iU17
--"" \ r ~J-1-1 --'1'."'--:; I t.t::::. l-:::> ~o
~;.:..~ \J I I I ~ Y'J {- ~ '-
...-:.~...-:~
e~~EOLA BAY CLUB
DC.
,
,
STAFF ASSISTANT'S CHECK SHEET FOR APPLICATION FILES
FILE NAME:
05~~o\o.. 6~~
~\ 00-0\ -o~
~\~
FILE NUMBER:
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
PERMIT PLAN NUMBER:
DATE RECEIVED:
\
DOCUMENT DA TE COMPLETED N/A COMMENTS
IN CO MPLETENESS
LETTER
COMPLETENESS
LETTER
INSUFFICIENCY
LETTER:
SUFFICIENCY
LETTER:
ABUTTING PROP. STD. FLEX ONLY
OWNERS LETTER
DRC LETTER TO
APPLICANT:
DRC DATE:
DRC COVER LETTER:
DRC MEMBERS: (as
soon as received send
indh'idual allJ)lications)
ATTORNEY Leslie Dougall-Sidees
ECo. DEV Lou Hilton
SOLID W AS11-: Jaames Maglio
FIRE Randv Hinder
ENGINEERING (2) Mike Quillan
Don Melone
DEVEP. REVIEW Lisa Fierce
Mark Parry
Scott Kurleman
Rick Albee
PARKS & REC. Debbie Richter
EMAIL ENTIRE DRC
AGENDA after deadline
TO
C YNDl
RALPH
ASMAR
CLERK
.
a
DC
S
ARCHITECTS
DESIGN COLLABORATIVE
SOUTH WEST, INC.
Marc E. Schiff AlA
Principal
Architect! Interior Designer
1. David Dekker AlA
Principal! Architect
Robert Gerard I-Ieiser AlA
Principal
Architect! Designer
Del L. Dixon
Principal! Architect
Richard Braun AlA
Principal! Architect
Albuquerque
320 Central Ave. SW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
505.843.9639
505.843.9683
.
F\LE 'OPl
Vi. (''If)' hI /(J .~
r 1../ ...; 1-" '...../ . '"
June 6, 2000
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Osceola Bay Club
Dear Ms. Fierce:
In response to the analysis provided by Bill Harvard AlA and the
conference call of 6-6-2000 we have revised the schematic design of the
Osceola Bay Club.
We have made the following revisions:
. A revised building section has been provided. The section indicates
that the proposed towers comply with the allowed heights as
permitted by the underlying zone.
. The maximum height from the adjacent street, Osceol~' Avenue,
bench mark to the deck of the roof is 150 feet and the midpoint ofthe
sloping roof of the mechanical enclosures are 16 feet above the roof
deck, 166 feet above the street bench mark.
. Mechanical equipment is typically screened by a tile roof with a mid-
point height at 30 inches, or less, above the roof deck.
. The balconies are shown in a schematic detail on the revised section
, /<
drawing. There are two types of balconies; both are predominately
open rail with metal rail sections.
. The curved walls of the Osceola Avenue fa9ade have been
redesigned and additional windows and balcony openings have been
added making the fa9ade more open to the east.
. The east and west elevations will be more unified by the use of the
terracotta color of the curved walls on portions of the west facing
elevations.
Santa Fe
130 Grant Ave., Suite 102
Santa Fe, NM 87501
505.982.7191
505.982.0585
Web Site
www.dcswarchitects.com
EMail
dscwialdcswa rchitects.co m
Dallas
2930 Commerce St.
Dallas, TX 75226
214.748.3081
214.748.3383
:.
.
.
. The roof design has been modified to diminish the impact of the roof
and parapets. The saw tooth geometry of the building, in our attempt
to increase the setback distance from our towers to the neighboring
towers and creating an Osceola Bay view for the majority of the
proposed units, creates a roof deck that is difficult to place a large
regular roof form. The roofs have been modified to be on the same
general plane with several sections that protrude above the general
roofline and form smaller cupola type enclosures around mechanical
equipment.
'J
. The upper floors of the towers, 9, 10 and II are proposed to have an
II-foot floor-to-floor height and floors 12, 13 and 14 will have a 12-
foot floor-to-floor height. The justification of the higher floor-to-
floor height (versus a 10-foot floor to floor height in the lower eight
floors) allows 10-foot glass windows, coffered ceilings, chandeliers,
and other amenities found in luxury living units.
It:;;;
. The "Mediterranean" tile roofscape at the top of the towers has been
introduced at the street level in the form of an elongated entry feature
and at the pool level as an offset from the drive circle on the upper
deck to the pool level.
. The stepped massing of Tower 2 relates to, at the ih floor, the
massing of 300 Osceola Avenue and Tower I to the south and at the
II th floor to the massing of 500 Osceola Avenue to the north.
. The terracotta color will be reduced in its intensity and a lighter tone
will be used and it will be compatible with the roof.
Thank you for your input and Bill's input; we'hope that we have
complied with the spirit of your comments. .
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me to clarify issues or
provide additional computer generated views of the project.
Sincerely,
T~
Robert Gerard Heiser, AlA
Principal, Vice President
DCSW, Inc.
2
I ·
II
~'"
HARVARD
JOllY
ClEES
TO P P E
ARCHITECTS, P.A.
A I A
Directors
R. John Clees, AlA
leffrey E. Cobble, AlA
WHliam B. Harvard, AlA
Steven M. Heiser, AlA
Blanchard E. Jolly, AlA
lames A. Shawhan, AlA
Jonathan R. Tappe. AlA
2714 Ninth 51. N.
51. Petersburg, FL
33704
727/896 4611
AA (000119
.
.
MEMORANDUM
Hll t\l~1 "
rG CD'OI/(i'?
DATE:
June 7, 2000
TO:
Ms. Lisa Fierce, Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
FROM:
William B. Harvard, Jr., AlA, NCARB
President
Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe Architects, P.A., AlA
RE: Osceola Bay Club
I've reviewed the revised renderings and elevations received via e-mail from
Richard Trella and have the following comments:
~ The softer colors are an improvement, the lighter the better, but I don't have
any objection to some tone.
~ The roof shapes are improved.
~ The curved walls have more relief.
~ I can't review the building height.
I'll be out of town Thursday and in for only a short time on Friday. Please leave me
a voice mail and I can respond.
WBHjr/dar
w:\harvard\fierce memo 01.doc
I
._.J
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENl
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATEh
,
Iii
F"
HARVARD
JOLLY
CLEES
TO P P E
ARCHITECTS, PA.
A I A
Directors
R. John Clees, AlA
Jeffrey E. Cobble, AlA
William B. Harvard, AlA
Steven M. Heiser, AlA
Blanchard E. Jolly, AlA
James A. Shawhan. AlA
Jonathan R. Tappe, AlA
2714 Ninth SI. N.
SI. Petersburg, FL
33704
727/896 4611
AA COOOll9
.
.
FILE COpy
11/ I'\l\ > ( /' 2-
.,,~.. ( I { i /(1 / I I .)
, '\. ____f t.! v , t."!
.~. . j'" \ .
I;' ,
,< :.-
! i r i
I . I I .
i JlJN 7 ?OOU'l II' I
L L J -=:,..
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT I
SERVICES I
CITY OF CLEARWATER
June 2, 2000
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Osceola Bay Club
Dear Ms. Fierce:
At your request and as a follow-up to our May 25th memo requesting additional
information and comments on the design for the above referenced project, we have
contacted the architect, Robert Heiser, with DCSW Architects, and have also been
contacted by Richard Trella with the following verbal responses:
o The Architect will provide the mix and apartment sizes, however, final plans have
not been completed and the multiple unit styles have not been finalized. This
information is adequate, and will allow us to evaluate the density and amount of
common space.
o The rationale for having 12' floor to floors on the upper stories is basically a
marketing and financial decision for increasing the value of those units. This
evaluation, we believe, should be performed by your office.
o The elevation and sections of the balcony and the railings were explained and
we believe that, with his clarifications, the design will be satisfactory.
o The comments regarding the curved wall on the NE and SE corners of the
towers were discussed in detail with the architect and it appears that, because
of the schematic nature of the plan development, it is the intention to articulate
those walls with additional openings for balconies that we believe will soften and
be less intrusive mass in the neighborhood.
o The comment regarding the differences in the elevations of the buildings was
discussed and it is our understanding that there will be some unification of the
building elevations to provide for a more cohesive design.
o The request for the over-height structure was discussed with the architect and
the ordinance was not fully understood by Mr. Heiser or myself, however, in a
subsequent phone call conversation with Richard Trella, it was my
understanding that this height variance will not be requested and that
.
.
..
modification of the building to eliminate the loft design is being incorporated into
revised plans.
o The terra cotta color suggestion to be introduced on other elevations was
discussed with the architect and I believe it will be favorably considered.
o The clay tile roofs were discussed and it is believed that the developer desires
to maintain this design feature, however, we suggested to Mr. Trella that the
design of the roofs be modified to consolidate the forms and not have separate
planes creating a disjointed appearance.
o Mr. Trella discussed with me the request for a 7' variance due to the parking
garage. This is not a matter that I was fully aware of and I suggested that he
discuss this in detail with your office.
Submitted by:
lliili~ .
William B. Harvard, Jr., AlA, NCARB
President
HARVARD JOllY ClEES TOPPE ARCHITECTS, P.A., AlA
WBHjr/dar
w:\harvard\fierce Itr 01.doc
Iii
",,'
HARVARD
JOLLY
CLEES
TO P P E
ARCHITECTS, PA
A I A
Directors
R. John Clees, AlA
Jeffrey E. Cobble. AlA
WilHam B. Harvard, AlA
Steven M. Heiser, AlA
Blanchard E. Jolly, AlA
James A. Shawhan, AlA
Jonathan R. Tappe, AlA
2714 Ninth 51. N.
51. Petersburg, FL
3 3 704
727/8964611
AA (000119
.
.
~.~
I -----. ---
. '.--.I /:'''.., --__
i' O~..~<<;~'I) r.i.........."\l
II ,. : . '.'
. ,. r---___. . . i
I I 'J l' ---- '. . :
I U U i JUN 7 20nO I/'! /
L U J~/
PLANNING & DEVEl I
SERVICES OPMENT
CITY OF CLEAR
WATER
May 25, 2000
Ms. Cindy Hardin
Assistant Planning Director
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Osceola Bay Club
Dear Ms. Hardin:
The following requests for additional information and comments are for your review.
Please call to discuss, because it is difficult to calculate the areas from the site plan,
I thought we could request this information from the architects.
Requests for Additional Information:
o Provide building floor plans to verify the number of units.
o Provide rationale for floors 11-14 having a 12 foot F to F. This adds 8 feet.
o Provide elevation and sections of balcony to show the railing and solid
conditions.
Comments:
o The curved walls on the NE and SE corners of the towers create more
perpendicular surfaces and appear very massive; this is enhanced by the color
and lack of articulation or openings.
o The S, W, and N elevations unnecessarily appear to be of different buildings
with random vocabulary of shapes, spacings and planes.
o The request for over-height structure for the loft is not clear because of the
sloping roof designs, increasing F to F heights on Levels 7-11 .
o Suggest that terra cotta color be introduced on other elevations.
o The clay tile roofs do not seem to fully integrate with the modern design, it
seems applied.
f\l: :JPl
.
.
o If the "Mediterranean" design on the roof levels is maintained, there should be
some ground level application.
o Good attempt to integrate the ground plane with vehicular access and building
entry.
o The waterside step-backs are a good feature to reduce the scale - this quality
should soften the street side.
o The waterfront side of building 2 has more design features to reduce scale by
articulations, step-back and depth, but it appears very arbitrary.
Submitted by:
~t>.
William B. Harvard, Jr., AlA, NCARB
President
HARVARD JOLLY CLEES TOPPE ARCHITECTS, P.A., AlA
WBHjr/dar
w:\harvard\hardin rpt.doc
Norlhside
&~S~ 11et,
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: June 08, 2000
To: Mr. Ralph Stone, AICP
City of Clearwater Planning and Development Services Administration
100 south Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference: Osceola Bay Club
Case FL 00-01-03
NES Project No. 9958
fILE COPl0
tt (!LJ 'DI -6:)
Herewith we submit the following:
1 Each
12 Each
06/06/2000
06/05/2000
Letter from DCSW
Civil/Site Plans, Landscaping and Irrigation Plans,
Schematic Section, Parking Layout, Osceola Realignment
Elevation Booklet
12 Each
06/07/2000
. " . ~'
'. .'.
.....
'Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any other question's'Pi comments.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
~
By:
enneth H. Roush, P.E.
O ~~~~W~ I,
1: '
JUN 8 2000 i-'
Copies To: Mr. Rich Trela
---........
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
NESADMI N(llMI N DSPRI NG.COM
N ESTECH((vMI N DSPRI NG.COM
727' 443 .2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
!
e
I
.
o
Ul
(')
ITl
o
>
)>
f!!11i iii
~?Z
...-
~"
:1'-::0
00
"
ITl
~ I
Ii ,(;)
II 1Tl::O
i ~g
'z
,,",0
<0
o~
o
!il
MAX BL.DG HEIGHT Pf~ tONe
"!.
d
;c:
a
"
-i
Ul
,
!6
z
(;)
::0
o
o
.."
;c:
ITl
(')
;x:
~,.
~.:
U~
~I'i
i i
~.
U)
-j0
OI
Ul ~r'l
(') r'l$:
)>
f;j :::0)>
U)-j
~ 0
0> --" 1Tl"
. f;j::o
! <0
R' U) )>"
r'l ~~
0 0
N R-
-j ;c:
ITl
0 ti
z
,
!(l
)>
(')
ITl
..... .....
o .....
.....
~
!
,
i
~
IE I SCHEMATIC SECTION
D OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
400 JOIlU I1REEf
CLEARWATER, FI.ORIOA 33755
fMM MeAN PJ;:OPf~TY EL-eVA liON
TO Tor Of L-IVING UNITS
8 ~
ITl
o
>
~h::O
)> -
f;j'
u ~
"0;;-
.
.!'.
lflDO
)> )> ITl
- ,-i
,.... ('))>
~ ~;=
ITl -< 0
.."
_ ::0
)>
;=
Ul
lD
)>
-<
'~.'.'....".....'.'...........'.'.'..,",,".'.'........
.: c' I
"~.
c.'i.
NOrlhside
~ee'lilt9 St!'Wiu4, '71U.
cwo. . LAMP ".LANNING . ~VfRO"'MiNT.L. 'fRA,..,SPOIlTAnoN
104 toUTH ~ .OA~ am ........ Mal om ........
ClMAWA'Ia,II.OItIItA........ "AIL: ...............N&.CIOM
.
.
g:<~
-:or o~~
- - - - - - - - f\~~,~-:"'~-~-~ ~a~
W'#A"A' "'~i!l
W/;./',f/:t e ~
; .Yr
: : i l "~-----i-!l, __I
. , ..J ,,,..
/ )....~
~PJ~'~'~. II I
."" ~~~
------'l i \-- I ~
i.: I.. '\ II ~
~i, r
m s ~ ~<\ ~ / / ,
jf ~: ~~~ ~~ )' / I
I ~ ~ ~; a! /
i e. I ~ ~~~ I / II
'2jl r 1/
o ~ I ~ ;f I
i ~ · ~ J/
I -' I . ,
i i ! If I
--.r:L--___--------~-----.- "'""=i
10NBS STR.BBT
I
il
~:
~,
I;
I
i
i
GEOR.GIA STR.EET
= y ;u~ ,. ;
I~ i..-'., I 131 ~.','~. IlIIi' I,
I~! JU.--' ~~~ i
l~l ~H ---' i
~~:'~ ~~ ~ ~B. ", , ,_ , ,.. ,_, ,i.
II II, OSC;~~AYE. REAUGNMENT ! I,~ '; i I !~~~~~~~t~~~'l(! If!r!!!
j-~ ~=---'::::-~'==-='. i,' .~. ',' 1"'1,1 :.;!.:~~,.i.;"Z~;~;Z~~~i'.:.~,"~~.' , 'Iii I' ll~.," iiI
,. OSCEOLA BAY CLUB ~ .... '.'~. -c''I,\i'''='J'',. ':', . i~~
, . 'd .;, .....ft ft !1!. ..!.. p .~" . ., ,
~ :~ ~ 400 .JONES STREET ~ ~ I ~ ~ J~'l;j.BJ;i'!! i;;~ ~i""1t~:B::i
'1 ., ~" '1IIi"!'.' 't "....!::'...~"
Ii , ,... ...."'RW'AT~R ~. -""IDA ~"'''7C''' ~ lJ ". I~ ~ '."., ',' " .' _, ..., ;;;,.:;~' ,ll. 'I. ~.;"
J: i ....L.~ -.... &.._n.. ..,..,.- I U-.J j ; I ,;I;.. :1, ' ;1: . . ," i-a LJ.J...J
NO........-=---
.-..llaluu
~ . . ~. _. ..('1
r:""~/f'I.,(~,,rt-oj'U$lt~" '-.,.tl';Uti'b?{J. 1<<,,'
.(.'V!:4 ., !I....."y, ';L,;>Y~',::C-i." \.'NI.,.:'~nM,',dl~'r....'. .. r(..,<"'~':.+"(."Y""',
.... IOU'IM -.aa ROAD .(1J.l. ~M6f MX: 0.11) ...........
CIlAatrl.Ta. .....DA _~ ....AI&: ..,.............COrM
.
JONBS STR.BBT
I ~ ~I'
___U
,---:=J
\ \
+
,
i.i
:~ UNPLA~/ED
I _ _ _____ _ _ ::..JV'Jl
.
II
II
I
-
Ii
~
g
.
i
.
f
I
-..r - -
.
STREET
~I
II
i
is
NOrlhslde
~ SewiuJ,1K<-.
<<va .. I.AND ."...M...l..." .. INYIAONM.INTAl. TRANSPORTATION
:'~ta.-=-':=........ ~~;=-=-"=
~larwtter
.
u
Memorandum
TO:
Rich Trela, Osceola Bay Development
Ken Roush, Northside Engineering
DATE:
May 17,2000
I)~ O#-Ce-
FROM:
Ralph Stone, Planning Director
RE:
Submittal Requirements for FL 00-03-01 - Osceola Bay Club Proposal
8!P?
Trela (469..), Roush (446.8036)
SENT VIA FAX:
As we discussed today, in order to continue the case to the June 20, 2000 Community
Development Board meeting, 15 sets of your complete application must be submitted by Friday,
May 19,2000. In addition to the other information you had submitted previously, the following
supplemental items must be included:
1. A revised site plan showing the footprint of all buildings and structures and all required setbacks
the building footprints, parking, etc.
2. Elevations of all buildings including dimensions, height, materials, etc.
3. A landscaping plan including:
a. All proposed structures and improvements, including fences, walks, pools, patios,
dumpster pads, treatment of all ground surfaces, etc.
b. Drainage and retention areas.
c. Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscaped buffers
including sight triangles, if any.
e. Delineation of parking areas and other vehicular use areas, including parking
spaces, circulation aisles, interior landscape islands and curbing.
g. Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and
location, including drip line.
h. Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and
proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names.
I. Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs, and ground cover plants,
including planting instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching, staking and
protective measures.
J. Interior landscape areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape
coverage, expressed both in square feet, exclusive of perimeter landscaped strips,
and as a percentage of the paved area coverage of the parking lot and vehicular
use areas.
k. An irrigation plan.
1. A grading plan.
Also, please make sure that sealed survey of the property (prepared by a registered land surveyor)
or plat of record is included in your resubmittal. A reduced site plan, landscape plan, and
elevations should be provided for use during the next presentation.
\ IAfS2\LFIERCElAfy Documentslcorrespondenceltrela and rousch - resubmittal.doc
.
.
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Quillen, Michael
Thursday, May 11,20008:16 AM
O'Brien, Kelly
Melone, Donald; Fierce, Lisa
FW: vacation request for osceola bay club
I thought they had to reapply because we need new utility letters, etc. Kelly- could you call Rich Trella and explain.
Lisa- I will be at the COB mtg. M.Q.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fierce, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 20005:44 PM
To: Quillen, Michael; Melone, Donald; O'Brien, Kelly; Arasteh, Mahshid
Cc: Asmar, John; Stone, Ralph; Hardin, Cyndi
Subject: vacation request for osceola bay club
rich trella (applicant) has requested that the vacation of osceola avenue be forwarded to the city commission for review
on june 1 (first reading) and june 15 (second reading). the clerk's deadline for the agenda item and advertisement is no
later than may 18. i understand some amendments need to be made to the application.
engineering needs to take the lead on this one: make a determination about the timing/scheduling of the vacation request
and process as required.
please contact rich trella (804.1417) as soon as possible.
thanks! (also, someone needs to represent engineering at the cdb meeting next tuesday for this project - it will be the
first case reviewed)
FILE COpy
.
.
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Richter, Debbie
Wednesday, May 03,20002:30 PM
Fierce, Lisa
RE: fees for osceola bay club
There has not been an official calculation done on this project since some of the information needed has not been
provided. The $62,655.20 OSR fee waS based on a value per square foot that Richard Trela threw out just so we
could show him how to use the form to calculate. We still need the following in order to do a calculation:
· Net land area (same as gross less natural preservation area)
· Verification of just value for land only from the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office
· Verification of existing structures (# of units if residential, square footage if non-residential)
This project will owe all 3 impact fees, Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facilities. I have not heard
from anyone since 2/1/00 when Mr. Trela met with me.
@Oeb (562-4817)
-----Original Message-----
From: Fierce, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11 :54 AM
To: Richter, Debbie
Subject: fees for osceola bay club
hi debbie,
the last estimate for open space/rec fees was $62,000. is this still accurate? (no changes to the project in terms of # of
units, etc.)
could you let me know by tomorrow am?
thanks
FilE COpy
.
.
Fierce, Lisa
Subject:
Melone, Donald
Tuesday, April 25, 2000 2:25 PM
Melone, Donald; Fierce, Lisa
Gust, Mike; Maran, Robert (Bob); Parry, Mark; Quillen, Michael; Downes, Tom; Maglio, Jim;
O'Brien, Kelly
RE: Osceola Bay Club (NEW SITE PLAN) date received April 18, 2000
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
I would like to add that we can use and WILL NEED TO use an address off of North Osceola Avenue for each tower.
don
-----Original Message-----
From: Melone, Donald
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 2:22 PM
To: Fierce, Lisa
Cc: Gust, Mike; Maran, Robert (Bob); Parry, Mark; Quillen, Michael; Downes, Tom; Maglio, Jim
Subject: Osceola Bay Club (NEW SITE PLAN) date received April 18, 2000
Lisa, I was off on Friday of last week and Monday of this week and I didn't get a chance to make some comments on
the above referenced site. If I still have time to share them with you I would like to at this time. They are as follows:
1) Handicap stalls to meet city/ADA requirements.
2) No flat work within the proposed 20 foot easement (tennis court!).
3) Sidewalk on the East side of North Asocial Avenue where the alley intersects the road: the proposed
sidewalk/pedestrians will be crossing over private property (Salvation Army site?).
4) Landscape buffer adjacent to North Asocial Avenue?
5) The proposed apron at the SW corner of Georgia Street and North Asocial Avenue: What is this for?
Roll out dumpster? We need to make sure that if this is the dumpster roll out area that Jim
Maglio doesn't have a problem with this location.
6) The owner/applicant will need a separate dock permit for construction of such structures within
Clearwater Bay.
7) Proposed storm line which is under the proposed tennis court? I know it's a private system and I
would like to make sure that if anything happens to it, it will be the developments
responsibility.
8) F.H. on Jones appears to be on private property! May need additional easement over this area!
9) Letter of no objection from 300 North Asocial Avenue for the partial vacation of North Asocial
Avenue.
10) Ingress/Egress easement for 300 North Asocial Avenue.
11) Georgia (west of North Asocial Avenue): is this one way East bound?
12) Parking Garage: Dimensions and access isles to meet city standards and specifications.
13) Dedicate the right-of-way needed for the realignment of North Asocial Avenue.
I hope that these comments will assist you and Asocial Bay Club developer. If you have any questions please
contact me and I'll see what I can do.
don
fILE COpy
1
.
.
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Quillen, Michael
Wednesday, April 12, 2000 10:38 AM
Fierce, Lisa
Gust, Mike
RE: traffic study for osceola bay club
The traffic count results showed a higher volume than anticipated. Vacating the entire roadway would put those cars on
Fort Harrison which currently operates at a level of service F in the p.m. peak hours, consequently we agreed with the
recommendation to keep one lane open. Northside Engineering's plan is acceptable. M.Q.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fierce, Lisa
Sent: Tuesday, April 11 ,20005:14 PM
To: Quillen, Michael; Arasteh, Mahshid
Cc: Stone, Ralph; Hardin, Cyndi
Subject: traffic study for osceola bay club
the case will be scheduled for the next cdb meeting and i would like to incorporate engineering comments into the
staff report. there are some questions i have, however:
is there some final determination based on the traffic that was counted? aside from keeping some portion of
osceola ave open with the development, is there any other recommendation? is the plan prepared by ken rousch
acceptable in terms of design and layout?
~ILE COpy
1
-------
------
----......
----
- ......
----
---
'-
A LtrIZ
B 5-76
BELVEDERE AP1S
CO-OP ~
c
. .
5 ' GUll
6 -
HARBOR Bt ..
, i
.sa. .
WATERFRONT 4
CONDO
21-31 .. 2 1
40 MIO
0 GEORGIA ~ t
.
'0 ~
8 .. , <<W7
I
I '2
I . -3
... <<W
11 <<114 3
..
~/04 :III .-
aM
..
~ ::;
...
:
e "
c::.
..~
JI'" ~
c
ae;z,
i u
~ en
a
Z
~ ~"''''' ...
~;~_.~~~~ ~
Q
_....1'7--,u.
YDEN
1
~
03.l.lV1dNn
]
:a
j,
i
it
e
i
lilB:lI.LS lIYIDlIOHD
181
II
;:1'
, i
" I
o:-~
I
I-
I
.
lit
a
I
I
IS
J
I I
IS I
00
.
.
..
.
~
..
.
.
.
- '1'
~au
.:: ":~ ~ '.1:. ~~ -t<''''.~. '.;t.,~+.:.~(
\"'1___':,'4\ "~" ff.:f,>i-
J S 'iI N 0 I - ,"
II
.
.
/'
LC) ttiLJfyz bl<r{-tz( tCr
1 '
ft~ (. OF? t't1:S
~-:;/I CO I (;7)
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Community Development Board members
FROM:
Planning staff
DATE:
May 15, 2000
RE:
Revised Conditions - Osceola Bay Club
The applicant has been working with representatives from 300 North Osceola Avenue (Belvedere
Apartments) since the distribution of the staff report. The applicant has provided a written
agreement stating that the portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way to be vacated in front of the
apartments will be sold to the affected property owners. Staff supports this amendment to the
plan and suggests revised conditions as indicated below:
***
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following conditions:
p M1.(,Lr.;L,
1) That Osceola Avenue right-of-way be maintained north of Jones Street:;' adjacent to
300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere apartments), be vacated and dedicated to the
owners of300 Osceola (with a revised plan to be submitted);
2) That the balance of the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City
Commission and relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised
application to be submitted);
3) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation; ~~L-
4) That the landscape plan be further refined and detailed to meet the requirements of
Code, including a minimum 10-foot buffer along all street frontages, prior to the
issuance of any permits, including the Osceola Avenue frontage which will include
both proiect and right-of-way property to be approved by Planning and
Engineering staff:
5) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
6) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor;
7) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
8) That conditions 1-5 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
Page 1
f1Ge
rG uV-Or- 03
.
.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Belvedere apartments to Georgia Avenue. Final confirmation of
the utility locations may require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola
Avenue right-of-way. The Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to
resolve this issue prior to review of the vacation request by the City Commission.
S:\Planning Department\C D BIFlEX\Pending Applications\Osceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 revised conditions - STAFF
REPORT. doc
Page 2
Norlhside
&~S~ 11et.
Date:
To:
Reference:
e
CIVil-
lAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAl-
TRANSPORTATION -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTA
o ~~~!: 0,.
May 19,2000
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Mr. Ralph Stone, AICP
City of Clearwater
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Osceola Bay Club
Case FL 00-01-03
N.E.S. Project No. 9958
( ) Originals
(X) Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
( ) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
() Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X) Per Your Request () For Your Review & Comment
(X) For Your Use (X) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date
1 5/19/00
15 5/19/00
15 5/17/00
15 5/17/00
15 2/18/00
15 5/19/00
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further
questions or comments regarding this proiect.
Copies To: File
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTECH(c:<.lMI N DSPRI NG.COM
727.443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
By:
filE COpy
Norlhside
&~S~ 1ttt,
.
CIVil-
lAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAl-
TRANSPORTATION -
May 19,2000
City of Clearwater
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attention:
Ralph Stone, AICP, Planning Director
Reference:
Osceola Bay Club
Case FL 00 -01-03
NES Project No. 9958
Dear Mr. Stone:
We are submitting fifteen (15) sets of revised Civil Site Plan, which show the footprint of all
the buildings and structures, the setbacks and the parking. Please note that only the 20 visitor
parking spaces are uncovered, the resident parking is in Parking Levels 1 & 2, below grade as shown
on the enclosed plans.
We have been working closely with Robert Heiser, ALA ofDCSW Architects and have
included the Schematic Sections in the set of plans. We have also prepared a booklet called
"Elevation Submittal" which addresses the issues of the buildings' dimensions, height, materials, etc.
We have also enclosed 15 sets ofthe "Elevation Submittal" booklets.
The Landscape Plan has been prepared by Ted Kempton, of Hardeman-Kempton &
Associates, Landscape Architects and is being submitted under separate cover. The Landscaping
Plan reflects all of the site elements as depicted on the Civil Site Plans as well as existing trees and
proposed landscape materials and installation methods.
You will also find a signed and sealed survey of the property included in the package.
We hope that you find all the materials submitted satisfy your requirements, so that the site
plan application will be heard and approved at the June 20, 2000 Community Development Board.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
Cc: Mr. Rich Trela
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTE C H@MI N D S P R IN G .COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
FILE COpy
.
.
...
o
~
m
::a
-.
I
.
.
I
.
.
.
I
.
.
I
.
.
-
''tt ~
Nonhslde
~ siB Jau &~ Sewia4.1tte.
CIVIL- LAMD PLAHMlM~ - ENVIRONMENTAL-TRANSPORTATIOM
104 SOUTH IIBQta ROAD CUAaW ATIlt. RORIDA m6J-J908
0'27) "1-". FAX: am ........016
.
-------,
~--
''''
--
f" .
I
I
~
-------------
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
1HE INFORMAnON DEPICTED HEREIN SHAll. BE 11 REFER TO 1HE DRAWINGS
USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THAT OF 1HE USTED BELOW FOR OlHEF
ORIGINAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS OAlEO: Ii PER'TlNENT INFORt.fA11ON:
II
HES COMM.: Ii DATE: I REFERENCE No.: il REVISION No.: ilSHEET No.
ii .
I ,
! I
I
, .
;
ill ~ :IVlL SITE PLAN
[]] OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
~ 400 .JONES STREET
.... CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
I
e
I
I
JON B. S T R. B B T
.
--------l
I
I
I
j
~
I
I
~
I
I
~ :
I
I
~
I
I
L_.. ~. _ --"'."'Z'
r
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
I:
~ I
(')
I ~
l ~
~
< I
tIl
:t
Cl
tIl
\
\
\
\
"
"
"
'............./",,'..../'
c~ I)
='11
IIi
ili
I
~ ~:
___U
- - -......,..,. -
1
GEORGIA
STREET
!
'~
~I
II
I
Nonhside
&~ SeJWiu4.11tC.
(lVlL . LAJlfD' PLAN)IONG 0 [NVIRONMfWTAl. TR.ANSPORTATION'
=:':T'.,.,-:::=...... .~~~:n=.:~~::::
~~~Jii
""~~~ ...~.:@.",.~",s I
. . _ J~'.'::,.!lf.:..-=Jl
"""""",. ~
......... I
UIPI~ljIJJ.. ~
11111 I I
.....
n
l"'
tIl
~
"
lIIl
~
-I
tII
"
III
~
"
.
o
"
-
The revised submittal package includes new buil
both buildings and three rendered views of the proposed project.
F.:- ..L:
~~I=~CU.~bl' ))1
.\. ! l~^.Y I 9 2000:. j I'
~ f'iifJ,,'- _,oS ,t
.,-< ~
, P~.JNING&C-E~-ELO~'f~~
L CITY~FE~~~~\~~~:;I~~ i. 0jr~~ :~ [~; :~ /1:
r: I ! :
Osceola Bay Club : I; J MAY 2 4 2000 ','
Architectural Modifications May 17,20 at 1____ L I
PlAl\,~: ': ..
CIVil-
lAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAl-
TRANSPORTATION -
Northsftl
&~S~~
May 17,2000
A color and material key is included in the elevation submittal.
The buildings (towers) have been slightly modified in the foot print
area while maintaining all required setbacks as previously submitted.
The redesign of the towers actually increases the setback of the North tower
by 20' as it approaches the Bay to the West, increases the water view for
the neighbors to the North at 500 Osceola.
The design maintains a minimum 100' setback between neighboring
towers and the proposed towers at the nearest points and typically
increases to an average of 120'.
The redesigned elevations were designed to better relate to the
contextual setting of both 300 Osceola to the South and 500 Osceola to the
North.
The building has setbacks and terraces that correspond to the
approximate height of it's directly adjacent neighbors to the North and
South.
The proposed curved treatment of the East elevation will visually
reduce the impact of the size of the towers. The top of the curved walls are
approximately the height of the top of 500 Osceola. The building steps back
with terraces and pitched roof elements above the curves.
The proposed 15th Floor loft and terraces are an important feature for
the proposed design. The intent is to create unique, custom designed two
story penthouse units with loft and terraces overlooking the main floor of the
penthouse. The total area of the loft will be no more than 1/3 of the gross
floor area of the 14h floor.
The general look of the building maintains the Mediterranean look of
the original submittal. The roof features tile roof sections above portions of
the roof plan, similar to the original submittal. Portions of the roof are
slightly taller than the original as the pitched roofs cover a greater portion of
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
NESADMIN@MiNDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
filE COpy
..
.
.
J
the roof than the original. The 179' height to the mid-point of a sloping roof
request relevant to the building design as the lofts are integrated into
portions of the sloped roof design. If the height request is not accepted the
unique character of the two story loft units will be lost and the applicant will
provide slight modifications to the building elevations to meet the height
restrictions.
The applicant strongly requests that the variance to 179' be granted
as the actual difference in height is minimal.
-~
The current standards allow for 150', the proposed 14' mean site
slope grade and penthouse enclosures up to 16'. Clearly, with the current
design standards and the midpoint height of a sloping roof criteria allowed
by current regulation, a taller building design (actual height to top of building)
could be designed on this site.
Thank you for reviewing our revised submittal and your consideration
of our request.
Very truly yours,
ft~
It CITY OF CLEAP.TER
ArPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINJSTlU.TION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES Bun.D~. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE.. -Z- FLOOR' .
PHONE \1'Z1}-562-450l FAX m:n S62-4S76
This fam ~"be submitted far all ~ fer ~ uses. ~. "~ -. ncnresidentlaI uses. fences.
Signs, W!Sfed rlgtds. ~ agIlBem81d1. senaIIs. dDdcs. marinas andalher marine struclL1I8S and hame ()O!e!~
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPUCANT NAME
IIAIUNG ADDRESS
PffONENUM8ER
PROPERTY OWNERS
. AGSITNAIE
IIAIUNG ADDRESS
PHONE NUIIBER
~
Service_s Inc. 304 S. Belcher Rd. Clwr Fl. ,33765 ~
--.
FAX-NUMBER: (727) 446-80~6":
tue
- -
100 Pierce Street, 'Suite --11Ql Clearwater. FL. 33755'
(727) 804-1417
FAX~:
- ,
Contract for Sal~;rorn:
(Ust all owners)
Anthony Markoupdous .'
Kenneth H. E.Qush P.E.
Malcolm Craft~ Geor e Raddart ami
: (727) 443-28~9
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORIIA'nON:
. Between 300 - .500 Osceola Avenue ! q J'\ j'/) / f' j
, --
5 IICI::S:: f ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCB. NUEER:
f .
-f
See Attached
09/29/15 oOObO 430 05QO-and others
. {f7o ,--....
~ Condo l,mits ...,. ' '
, -,
(1QIlQIt Qt......", ". '\2!1!11 roams at squanI fDatagB at
3.27 a ~s .
~-
-..f'
'?\
d1
'\1
~
~
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
SIZE OF SITE:
DESGRIPTroN OF REQUEST.
i VI d (/1 .; "VI -0w1 '>;()cl "-
DOES THIS APPUCA1i6N INVOLVE
1/ {
I, the undersigned. adcnowtedge that aU
represelat.atb'ls made in' this application
~7~~
~~L1J:-'C
~ d pIq*ty aM*' or .......w...
STATE OF A.ORlDA,
Swam to and subscribed .
, -::1"" "'-" " ~ . A.D., J8' ~ m me andIclr
~;~~,~ 5 I re II cJ 0 S pef5o"al~
IdEi1tiflcatb1. (.
\
'"
'"
"'J
"^'
~
,
f\,J
"--.()
\n
~ FOR PLANNING OFfICE USE ONLY:
~ LAND USE DIS lRiCT OF pAReS.; ZCNING: 1--1 D iZ. FVTURE DESIGNATION: CD 13
ZONINGC1.ASSIACATlON OFADJACBIT PARCELS: NORTH: HDtL.. SOUTH: D EAST: H,-i)!jC WEST: H...r-~J r-
\ R1TURE 1.ANO USE C1..ASSACAlloN'QF AO.JAC:NT PARC8..S: NORnt cb~ -SOUTH: ~T. ~ WEST: ~
-L
~
'I
..
-
RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS CRITERIA
for OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
Updated April 18, 2000
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
economically impractical without deviation from the intensity and development standards.
Due to the high cost of land and construction to create the aesthetically outstanding buildings and
maximize the open views of the Bay and Gulf, the configuration of the 2 towers with extensive
green area and landscaping have been designed to enhance this unique site on the bluff
overlooking Clearwater Bay.
It is not practical to build less than 163 units. This number of proposed units does not exceed the
169.5 units allowed per the 1993 Periphery Plan (50 units per acre) for this area. Therefore, in
order to maximize the open views to the water, the height of 153 feet above street elevation (169
feet from the median bluff elevation plus 10 feet for the penthouse terrace) is necessary for the 2
towers, with setbacks from the realigned Osceola Avenue right of way to the new pavement of
less than 15 feet in the front.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residentiallnfill Project
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The entire development, from the landscaped, gated entry with a security guard, to the 2
swimming pools with decks and steps overlooking the water, is designed to raise the value not
only of this site, but also of its surroundings. This is due to the quality and aesthetics of the
design of this project.
The approximate proposed value with the new structures, landscaping and amenities will be
about $75 million.
3. The uses within the Residentiallnfill Project are otherwise permitted in the district.
Attached dwellings are permitted in the land use for this district. A social area, parking below
grade, tennis courts and pools are also included in the development.
4. The uses within the Residentiallnfill Project are compatible with adjacent lands uses.
Yes, they are compatible with the adjacent land use. The adjacent lands to the north and south
comprise multi-family developments along with their amenities. The adjacent land to the east is
owned and used by a religious organization.
5. The development of the parcel(s) proposed for development as a Residentiallnfill Project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Yes, the Mediterranean architectural design, landscaping and parking exceeding the code
requirements, use of higher quality materials in the structure and architectural details, the removal
of the huge dogleg from the Osceola Avenue right of way, and the visual aesthetics of this
project, all combine to vastly upgrade the immediate vicinity. Also see #2 above as well as the
rendering.
FILE
\
.
.
6. The design of the proposed Residentiallnfill Project creates a form and function that
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Yes, the Mediterranean architectural style is very much in keeping with the Floridian landscaping
and design indigenous to this area. Additionally, by upgrading our site, we will hopefully spur
others to redevelop with such a view toward this higher standard, so as to add to the overall
enhancement of the immediate downtown community and the entire City of Clearwater. It is our
intention to contribute to beauty of the upcoming bluff and waterfront redevelopment.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Increasing the building height above the Flexible Standard requirement of 130 feet, to 153 feet
above the street elevation (179 feet height from the median bluff elevation), and front setbacks to
zero feet along the realigned Osceola Avenue, are justified due to the beautiful architectural
design, pleasing configuration of the two tower residential buildings, lush landscaping, maximized
open space, greater open views to the water, 2 levels of underground parking exceeding the 1.25
per unit requirement, and other amenities included in this project. These higher standards will
benefit and enhance the immediate vicinity, and set a higher target for the style and quality of the
bluff and waterfront redevelopment in downtown Clearwater, thus benefiting the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
p.Ol
..Jan-l9-00 03:34P
A
WI
. CITY OF CLEAKW.
AFFIDAVIT TO AuTIIORlZE A~ENT
PLANNING It DEVELOJ'MENl.' SERVICES ADMINlSTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVIcES BU1U>lNG. 100 SOtJ1H MYRll.f A VENUli, 2" FL.OOll
PHONE (127)-~6HS67 FAX (721) 562~S16
(
"
,r (I 'r
,
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUHTV OF PIN'Ll.AS
GCOTl':e llahder"t Green COTner Inc ~unset Pro erties,MoTrishi11, ..Tnc
(NllIMollall~I'I'f-""') Osceola Properties '[nc.
.;.....--.-
1. that (I amlwe are) the owncr(s) and record tille holder(s) of the following described property:
1 (I <'
r1aV7:p
ADDRESS OR GENER"~ ~OCATtON:
312,314,400 & 404 - Osceola Ave
/)O! ..
7
2. That this property constitutes the property for which Ii request for lJ:
Residential Development
(I'lOlU" 01 nlqUUI)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (dOes/do) appoint..
Richard Trela of osceola Bay Development 1,LC
... I""'I\'*') "llent(I) U>-'" I"., potIllons or _lIOG_Into n....-y1O -'foclsuoh pe!lllO":
4. That thi~ affidavit has been exsc:u18d to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
~ (~.) tho
SIGN (Prop!ftt 0wNr)
George Rahdert
ndersigned authority. hereby certify that the foregOing is true and correct.
I fJ A/.1t~ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY ~F PINELLAS
, Swum ~n.d 5U~bed before me; this i i -I/..... day of
~a lLuuwl . AD., ":'>O...\)to me llftd10T
by J . who ~ pcroonallj
Irnnwn "~3 ...,vdu'-'Vd
a~..fttltlr..ti~
l ,.'-.
.., . .~/..'- ./ .."L-.
, / .
,i " , i
, .
I I
SIGNED (P~ 0wnII'l
----,
SIGNEO (PfQllellY OWlOofl
II~Nel) (P'"""" ~
.do'''"" Michelle S White
.=6 .
.1iiij! *My commission CC773141
,~./ Expires October 19. 2002
li~~~
---~~
~ ~~~WC~~'
1_--....".",'
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
,-~ITY OF CLEAFiWATER
JAN-19-2000 15:02
77%
P.01
.
.
~.,
i 1J~~
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
AFFIDAVIT TO AtmIORIZE AGENT
~1NG" Dll:VELOl'MEN'r SEIlVlCES ADMJNt.'fI'RATJON
ll(1JNIQlAL SIlIlVlCBS 81J11DlNG. 100 SOtJtlI. MYR1U .\VR"WIii. 2" flOOR
HlONti ~m)-,..z <U67 !'AX (727) ~'''''S76
STAT! Of FLOR~
COUH'f'V OF "NSlLAll
Matkoplols Antonios
(~_ of! III P1llI""'Y .....,.)
,. 1hat (I am/'we are) 1h9 OWIler(s) and record title hOlder(ll} or lhe following described property;
~DRE$S OR G'NrRAL LO:::A~IO'"
303 Osceola
400-410
JOl1~S
St'rE!at
2 Thai thls prOperty comltiluleSll'1e propeny for which a Isq....al far II
B~5identtal Dav~lopment
(NMln '" """'.1)
3, That the undersigned (h..sItlave) Il!>pointed and (dOfl$/do\ af)P.C!int
Richa~d Tr~la or O.ceola ~ay Development LLC.
.. (hiWIM"l ogonl\.ll._....",." ~., ""Of _... _10 lIlIeo\ _........'
4, The! this Bffidsvil has been executed to induce the City of Cllerwaler, nol'lda to cOl'lsidor and act
on the above described property;
liGNm~ ~
undersigned authority, hereby certify that tM foregoing is true and conect
STAli OF FI.OftIOA, COUNTY O~"JINElLA&
OO/Ool<,lu .tICI tIlb84:ri~ befor' me tills r i'l''1 ckIy ()f
~-r~~~~~.:; ~\7\;C;~~~:=~;
~ h!J.procluecd
.s enlllilllllioll,
. ~1b?l)l" J\ . ~~ NA-
I'IIWY ...,
M'J-__
SlGNttl "'-lY c>.IlOfl
I'OHID (I'.....,ty 0wnIrl
')
1
"'~';f..~:'f>',, Barbara G. Barnes
~1".~~:.. MY COMMISSION # CC746349 EXPIRES
,.,: ~.~= June 6, 2002
''Oy;.... -;.,,$'~ BONDED TKRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC
"'~Rrll"l"
J
F'! .i\NNiNG & OEVELOF)Mici~ T
SER'v'ICE~'
'i T \1 i.J F f,~ ~ F t",F~\ \"ii, -1 f
ZO'd
dl~:EO 00-6i-U~~
"
CITY OF '"'LEARWATER
-FFIDA VIr T.JTJIOi A <;ENT
PLAN~1N(; &l DEVJ:LO~'T SM YU,.::';s Al)!\fiNTSTRA TJOJ'o.
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDlNa, 100 SOUTH MYRTl.E A VENUE, 2"" FLOOR
PHONE <Z.27)-5614~67 FAX (721) 56Z--4576
./
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLA,S
'lalcolm Croft
TIeverly Croft
(~ of! .. PIVPE'''Y ""'MIra)
1. That (I amlwe are) the lOWrler(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property.
AOORl:I:i~ OR GFNrRAL LOCATION.
3011-30e Osceola Ave.
2 That thIs property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Residential Development
(N~ 0/ requQl)
3. That ttle undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint
_._~chard Trela of Osceol~ Bay !)eveloomen-1
~ (hilil\l\ejr) llQenl<t} to encule ."y pelI~ or oCher doWmlllltl n~ to ~t tucl\ pe1!l!cn
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, rlOflOOl to consIder and i:lcl
on the above de$cribed property;
5.
ereby certify that the foregOing is tnJe and correct
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PlN EL LAS
SWQ tu and ltUbscribed before me this .QQ (it, day QI
, A.O. -~to me IIfl(J/o/
_ C , who IS pt;l:;onolUy
I'q.s;s/Oo __~
iJ~' t.'Vj U (...Q.~
SIGNEO (PropIltIy Owr.r)
Malcolm cr~
~
~:verly_~oft
SIG~jm l"~ Own.r)
by M _ C.c
known has produced
as Identltication.
J~~ie
~io. SdlA..c (k/'
My~:
SIG....EO (P'opooo1y Owroet)
ALLEN -:-:8Er:~;:::IST
SOLlCITOj..J
MEOWAY HOUSE
18-22 CANTELUFE ROAD
EAST GR:NSTCAO. VI SUSSEX
RH~3 38J
Tel: 0134.2 ::::::: :' ! / - ~ '3877
(OX: 30C_: :: :_- _. ~ ..,.:- ;-EAO)
'~ --=:~ '::::: --I' -,:=- rD.l
-----.i0~....,'_''--' ,
I I j
I I,
" II , I
- I' I
I ~L -_/
[ [
~; /:'''~\i~~':~ & ~:~:~\:[: 2Pl;:_-"~'
S::-:;. -
:,;,.,.' ,.,.,J
,v;:.JI
""', ' :;;,
. '~,
,'-.1',,:';:'" b.. .Illo-' ,,,,~
), .'
C'roft
TIeverlyC'I'oft
~....'
--
~.'~
'"
.' .,' , "
l"hat(1 arfllwe are) thflownel'(s) and r&eOl"dtitle holder(s) of the following describedptoperty: '
ADnRl;$~ OR'GFNrRAL.lOCATION,-.-
304~~O! Osceola Ave.
b<b....:. .---.....,. ..
/'
,-!. r.
.,--' ..
~I
,"":"
~ ..-""~.....:--, -.....-......., Lbo..
~.
'f~tth,.property OOn81:ilutesme propertyfQr which arequ8st for a:
" 'R" d' "'1" ' I,
':eslentlaDevelopm;ent', '
}/
;~~
"'J"~"~t[l~~~$igned~aSlhaVe)' lipporntedand (does/do) appoint "', ", '
, ,:'~"::~i,~h~rd"re:l 1;l,:6f'" O$~.ebla llay1)av:e I otl,m..e:nf. " ":~~'~
",~','~.)<l.~'~e~,,~.,~,~~A~...,~~~~~,::::."" ""'::=;:;;-""'~'"'~....' .~~"k~:;l";" .:,~'; ";:1:""
, ' '," ',. '", , ,,' '> ,',' 'i1~'
""!f~elt_.f't"'~'d~~~~': ",',
,r , " .",", ',.,' '.".;":r/i'!~:,~:/:~" ", "~"~I ''''', :",i:;:;:~~
--<<rJ<l:,.A .,'
....~pq--.
~ I>..- .,~
"':'"""1.~
'~
(,".:,
1 '
. .~
}I', ,!
Ii:;:')
1~~.6 7.4576 PLAN PAGE 02
. ~~o~~attENf
· I'I.ANNJNG Ie DItVELOl'MENT SEIlVICIS AJ)MINJS'IIlATlON
MUNlCPAL SSlVlc::iS WUlJJ)JJ40. 100 soutH MYan.& "vmonm. 2"" FLOOIl
fHONB ('7%7)-562-4567 PAX ('7%7) S62-4S76
03/14/~eee
....--....- -.-..
STATIOI' FlDItlDA
COUH1'V OF ....u.AII
Ct:1.r;~ H(;u-; of.J
(tMIM "" II .....--t
1. That (I am/We are) the owner(&) and rKOrd title hOldar(a) of the following d..crib4td property:
AOO"ISI 01\ ~NEAAL L0CA1tOfl: '3 l) I n Sf CJoLA A-\.Je..
Cleo.4U~ .(:.uy2( iVJ ."33 7,)-\
2. That this property constitutea the property fOr which a request for 8:
~-'2S \. 0 Q,.,rt{AL {k\J flJo~r"t1t:,.J I
(,..,. ".....,
3. That the undersigned (hasJhave) appointed and (doesldo) appoint
~ 1"- ~M-O T(Z.G.J..,A ~ O~lA ~ D~oPWlc",,-r.
"lhll<'Nltllllflll,t to -... "'" ,...,. lit'" *'-"' IlIOtMII';tO'" ........-on;
4. TNt this affidevil has been execut.d to ind~ tne City of Clearwet.r, Florida to conaidet and ad
00 ltw ebove d..c:riMd property;
5. TJ1 (I/wl), tho ~gnld ~. .....by _ - tho ~ng ;1"" ond co.-ct.
L ~ r ~ TATe or P1.DIUDA, COUNTY OF ".JNEUAI
IlGNEIlI"OIIIlt'IY owr.) SwOm 10 and before me UlIs . dlY of
A.D.. l' la me In(IIor
. wt\O II pettanlUy
//
//
BIGNEll (PtlIIMftY o.wr)
by
lenOWft lias produced
..lden(iflcation.
_"D ~o..--l
SIGNil) ~ o..r.)
~
My~"'"
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
SUBSCR!AE AND SWORN TO ME
T~~Ot#~
.
NOTARY PUBLIC
l,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"'''''''''''''''''''''''i
! .._~ SANDRA K. FARNHAM ~
- COMM.1241871 "'CI
~ NOTARY PUBlIC - CAUFORNIA -
'WI SANTA CLARA COUNTY ~
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT
d~fWlY~-.1l..I -.At2W
CITY OF CLEARWATER
IOOd
4w/-CYo70 .
.
'.
'.
/0: 11 trtt.. PfJee y
5&2-- L/57v
IO"d
FILE COPl
'f0 (JO 0"03
d17~:ZO 00-9I-Al;!W
.
.
f"AGE (12
~5/15t2~00 11:05
%01;1083
GPAI'ISUI':
~
May 12.2000.
To Whom it may concern:
I live the immediate surrounding area of the Osceola Bay Development.
The upgrading and beautification of the area along Clearwater Harbor will
enhance our city revitalization project and make Clearwater a more valued place
to live.
I am in favor of lhe Osceola Bay Development project.
'live at C Q;) Soo W1.;Tu C)~.. t t"QC,.i, Clearwater, Fl.
A~"( #' f II \,\K)l.lc~ ~ L ~o 3l
C OsM'~Q.- \J clJ" ~~
CLARISSE MESHOU7'
ZO'd
d17E:ZO OO-SI-Ae'll
e
.
B51l5/2013iJ 11: 05
%051 ClIO::;
GF:~\r~'=;uP
PAI;.E 0.::
May 12,2000,
To Whom It may concern:
I live the immediate surrounding area of the Osceola Bay Development
The upgrading and beautiflcation of the area along Clearwater Harbor will
enhance our city revitalization project and make Clearwater a more val~ed place
to live.
I am in favor of the Osceola Bay Development projeot.
I live 31-,3 ~ d III (),n~ 1) I. .Jl ' Clearwater, FI.
.....
EO"d
d17E:20 OO-SI-A12I11
nHY-l~-0e
MON .19
AM ELLIE 1l0L(;ER
81.2 1964
P..Bl
8kanM;Yt. 3J~.
500 N. Oeceola Av., Suite 811
Cleal'W8'-', Florida 33755
PH: (813) 442-7726
Fax: (813) 442-1964
15 May, 2000
To Whom It May Concern:
I flm in favor of the new luxury condo project as set forth and planned by Osceolll Bay
Development.
I live at 500 N. Osceola Avene\le.l have lived at this location for fourteen years,
I wish it were nOI so but the neigboorhood in which I live ilnd in which I plan to
continue to live in is quite run down. Many of the houses and their sun'ounding trees.
gUlss etc are not kept up. Waste is allowed to collect. Above the 300 building and to the
500 building on the west side is ol,e OrlM most neglected seotions ofNonh Osceola.
Osceola Bay Development and its cmrent project will begin a badly needed \lpgrade. r
am hopeful that its excellent standards and aesthetics will kick off an entire
redevelopment of the whole NOl1h Osceola Avenue and North Fort HatTison Avenue
arellS SO that in ten years we will see that a major improvement in this section of
CleArwater has come 8oout.
All b)' itself the new condominium buildings and the care with which they are to be
conslructed And the beauly oftheir surro\mdings, pools, etc will brighten things up alot
and increase everyone's values in the SUlfounding BJe8S,
Sincelely,
-~~1
Ellie Bolger
170'd
d9E:ZO 00-91-^~W
90'd
.-~...."",...n HOspitality
727 4.00S
May 12, 2000
Mr. Rich Trela
Developer
Osceola Bay Development
Dear Mr. Trela,
On behalf of the Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association I
would like to express to you our approval of the revised plans for
your project which include leaving the existing northbound only
Osceola Street that can be utilized by the entire ncighhorhood. We
undL.'1'stand the location win be altered somewhat, however, it does
not appear that move should change the purposes for which the
road is used.
Inc Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association appreciates
your efforts to work with our neighborhood on this project and
would welcome the opportunity to provide whatever assistance we
can provide to make the project a success.
Sincerely,
~m;PL
Vice President
Old Clearwater Bay
Neighborhood Assn.
P.Ol
d9~:20 OO-gt-^~W
r'\AY-l0-;2Be0
JQIul Gowans
G_'tJI
Lt. CoIonlll Donald Faulkner
Di""i~l C(Jlltllt#ll4_r
ADVISORY BOAIlD
omCEllS
~..
OtttM.Ln
'Vice CUi......
Carol E. looIrey
n._
J...pIl J;. Hu..b
s.c....,
Mt>. R_ WvYd
ADVISORY BOAJltl
JoI&OJEItS
ArthuJ D. Doc:kelmM
F.dwOJd D;u.-~
OIl1b W. Fi""P.
Solly H, FOOl.
JollA H. Orsllsm
william E. !bit:, M.D.
Leon R. HIIJllIKlCt
CarolyJI n.PrK Hill
JooepIl K. Hucllu
Williom 0.1_
Heyes \... I(j!uody
Cork M. Lu
Comt It u.-rcy
GilbcJt D. ~.A,ihor
M/$. FraU Mwplly
MI, DoNld N.........
Bony P<try
WeIlcll'o....1I
J.O$~I...
Cvani. S..""'d
Lee S. Sa....
o. ~~ 1'Ucl:11
J_ $, "IOUI
0....,. WI","""
UFE MEMBUS
RAl..... 4- """'oil
Go.... lIUIklr7
M~ Robert "'bid
good
12:00 .
THE SALVRTla-l ~MY
7277259749 ~.~J~~
. Raymond A. Cooptt
Tm-il()l'i/ll Ct:JmJMIIU,
.
THE SALVATION ARMY
~ illlMJ.1&t. ~ IlR4Ib.
1625 North Belcher Rood 3376S
p.O. Box 8070. ClutwlItc.I. FL 331.5&-8010
Phone (127) 715-9177 . FAX (127) 7'-S-'>>49
Majorll Jobn and Marth.lyn Needham
Corps OJIicus
May 10,2000
Mr. Rich TI'811a
Osceola Properties
100 Pierce Street #1101
CleiI%'W3ter, Florida 33756
Via U.S. Mail and via facsimile mail to 727-461-0670
Re: Ca-oHaI Oevelo9ble1lts . North FQn Jlarrisoa
Dear Rich.
This letter follows our meeting last week: 10 review plaus ror our rc.spc:cti\fC Capital
Developments in the area between North Fort Harrison and !he Intercoastal Waterway.
Your project seems to have no adverse effect upon our current operation, nor do we feel
that the project which we propose will have any adverse effect on what you are planning
to accomplish.
I am particularly glad that you wm: able to resolve the issue of the vacation of Osceola
Street by simply straightening out the street
We certainly do want to be good neighbon and work together for the common good.
Look forward to futl1l'C discussions as our respective projects develop.
Sincerely,
~~~
CORPS OFFICER
JlN/jmf
TOTl=L F>.02
d98:Z0 00-9I-^2W
Northlide
&~S~ 1~,
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
May 24, 2000
Mr. Ralph Stone, AICP
City of Clearwater Planning and Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference:
Osceola Bay Club
Case FL 00-01-03
NES Project No. 9958
Subject:
Transmittal of Revised Site/Civil Plans
Dear Mr. Stone: I t /
We are submitting fi~ 5) sets of revised site/civil plans, which show the footprint of
all the buildings and structures, the setbacks and parking. Please note that only the 20 visitor
parking spaces are uncovered; the resident parking is in Parking Levels 1 and 2 below grade as
shown in the enclosed plans.
We worked very closely with Robert Heiser, AlA ofDCSW, Inc. Architects and have
included the Schematic Section in the plans. We also prepared a booklet called "Elevation
Submittal" that addresses the issues of building dimensions, height, materials, etc. Ten sets ofthe
booklets are included with the submittal.
The Landscape and Irrigation Plans were prepared by Ted Kempton of Hardeman-
Kempton & Associates, Landscape Architects, and are included in the submittal sets. The
landscaping plan reflects all of the site elements as depicted on the site/civil plans as well as
proposed trees and other landscape materials, plus installation methods.
You will also find 11 signed and sealed property surveys in the submittal.
We hope that find this submittal complete and satisfactory, so that the project application
will be heard and approved at the June 20, 2000 Community Development Board meeting.
Sincerely,
N~INEE
L~neth H. RO:h, P.E.
fiLE COPl
2 4 2000
cc.
Mr. Rich Trela
o [E(C[E~~[E
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATE R, FLORI DA 33765
N E SA DM IN@MI N D S P R I N G .COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CfTY OF CLEARWATER
1
Northlide
&~ Sew.Uu 1~,
.
CIVil-
lAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAl-
TRANSPORTATION -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: May 24, 2000
To: Mr. Ralph Stone, AICP
City of Clearwater Planning and Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference: Osceola Bay Club
Case FL 00-01-03
NES Project No. 9958
Herewith we submit the following:
1 Each
15 Each
15 Each
10 Each
11 Each
5/24/00
5/22/00
5/17/00
5/22/00
2/18/00
Letter
Civil/Site Plans (10 Sheets per set)
Architectural Modifications May 17,2000
Elevation Submittal (14 Page Booklet)
Boundary, Topo and Trees Survey (Signed and Sealed)
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any other questions or comments.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
BY:~~
enneth H. Roush, P.E.
Copies To: Mr. Trela
r" ,".~ .~
[ 4 {UYJ
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER. FLORI DA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
\~'~-
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
.
.
i
"
i
1
I
i~
EXISTING ROW
TO BE VACATED
0.31 ACRES
I
,
II
,
I~
I
,
I
,
I
,
EXISTING ROW
TO BE VACATED
.31 ACRES
PROPERTY TO
BECOME DEDICATED
RIGHT-OF-WAY
0.16 ACRES
"I'
~~~
NEW PROPERTY LINE OSCEOlA AVE. RlGHI'-oP-WAY 10 REMAIN
z ----;;--
< \
-
~~7- \
------- \
\, ,..:S)
'-~.--\----
\9-
\
\<p.
\1'
\'1,
\
\
\
,
L5
4
o. A:
t)'-
~I
-':1-, -----.---EXISnNG~--.-----..--
w..,4
\\Asampson\c-drive\Acad-H\P\9958\Site.dwg Fri May 05 12: 09: 35 2000
JON"Il.S ~~
_....11 . '
~
00
UNPLATTED
-
p e
I i
I p I
I I I ~
~ ;
II ,
..
.
I Ii
I II
I I
I ... ~I
--
-------- -- --
GBOR.GIAp
~
.
I
I
I
I
I ,
i ~
I ~I
D OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
_ .JONES STREET
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
~"."."
. HlllON.
l;i;. """>;
. ~
'/11il ~~i'{1 ~~~~J!!
0!/b0/2000 03:38
442.0
ANN DE POOL.
PAGE 01
FAX from:
fiLE COpy
Ann DePoole
Bus: 447-4711
Fax:~
.'- IO-od
Date: .s -- "
To: ~~
Fax #:5& J--'l~ 7iJ;;
No. of Pages (including this cover
If you did not receive this trans~
contact us. Thank you.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Comments:
~Z~~~~r {2dJ
Au~
cD 0/ U?;
)5/J0/2000 03:38
ANN DEPOOLEe
PAGE 02
Gerald D. Ellenburg
Chairman a Chief Executive Officer
HOT E L 5
TO: THE RESIDENTS OF THE BELVEDERE
300 Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida
AITN:MRS. ANN DE POOLE
MR. BART DOBIN
RE: EASEMENT RlGHTS ON OSCEOLA AVENUE
May 9, 2000
BY PERSONAL DELIVERY
Dear Mrs. De Poole:
This correspondence is issued on behalf of OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
the developer of THE OSCEOLA BA Y CLUB, which company is a controlled subsidiary
of Matrix Lodging, and is issued to you by us in our capacities as Chairman and President
respectively of these two companies.
Pursuant to meetings between your association and ourselves, it has been agreed, and this
correspondence is meant to conftrm, that your association (or whatever is the lega.l
ownership entity of the Belvedere) will be sold for one dollar ($1.00) the land described
on the enclosed map which is that part of Osceola A venue that is being vacated pursuant
to our development applications on file with the City of Clearwater. Only that land that
sits adjacent to your driveway is subject to this sale, as the enclosed map details. The
similarly sized parcel that is "cross-hatched" is being vacated to your association directly.
This sale is contingent upon your association's cooperation and support of the Osceola
Bay Club development plan, including the vacation plan for Osceola A venue, as it is
presented before the two upcoming public hearings on May 16 and June 2, 2000 (or
whatever dates to which these hearings may be extended).
Subject to prevailing regulations, we are vested with the necessary and incumbent
authority to bind Osceola Bay Development, LLC to sell this property to you under the
above-described circumstances.
Matrix Lodging, LLC . Affiliated Companies
100 Pierce Street, Suite 1101 PO Box 300 Clearwater, Florida 33757
Tel (727) 469-8900 Fax (727) 469-8800 jerryOesuit..hotels.com
0~/IB/2000 03:38
442.
ANN DEPOOL.
PAGE 03
, haiunan -
Ba Development, LLCs
RICHARD TRELA, President ~
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
Date
Date
We
represent
herein that we, and
have all incumbent authority to bind The Belvedere and its
association.
.J5/10/2000 03:38
---
Tlftlll
442.
ANN DE POOLE .
l.U
Z
-
..J
PAGE 04
~t
( .
\ fa ~
f~ ~
Q.~
(! \'-\ w
, Z
I
Cl
;:U.J
o!;{
~U~
~a::
o"""'u
~w<(
t/)al,-
xo~
UJt-
.fl /
o u ('
11 ~l~~
~'!: ~
~~\-~
~.j~
~IP~
z
C
t-
~
Ck
It LL
Q
C
(l
a.
M.Z?8r..6~
.9'-'8 I
ftflmf
%... ... 1.%1 yy,,, ~":AT nn/.n/on
Norlhsift
&~ SewUu 1~,
-
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: April 19, 2000
To: City of Clearwater
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference: Osceola Bay Club
Case FL 00-01-03
NES Project No. 9958
Herewith we submit the following:
15 Each
1 Each
Revised Cover Sheet C 1.1
Updated Residential Infill Projects Criteria
Please replace the cover sheet from the April 1 ih submittal with this sheet. Thank you.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any other questions or comments.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
By:
Copies To: File
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
J o.:.:~~~
.
p
I p I
I I I
~
UNPLATTED
-
00
i
I
!
,
J
l.:a~
-------- ----
GBOR. lAp
~
.
I
I
I
I
! ,
I ~
~I
D OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
400 .JONES STREET.
CLEARWATI!R. FLORIDA S37515
~.
I~..... 'I :~~:_'~'.:'" "_. .....,.~~....J ~II r Nonl!'!'!
..... ' .,il~ii,'I!;,IIII" E ~ I avo. . LA"" ......"'''. . '''YI.O'''''INT4'. T...."JOG.Uno"
;1 ::...-:"\'&-=............. ~w:::.=.~:.=.:~
Norlhsflle
&~ Sew<<u 1~,
..
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
February 29, 2000
City of Clearwater
Planning & Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attention:
Reference:
Subject:
Mr. Mark Parry
Ms Lisa Fierce
Osceola Bay Club Project
Case FL 00-01-03
Transmittal of Additional Information
Dear Mr. Parry and Ms Fierce:
Transmitted with this letter are the following:
15 Each
15 Each
Site/Civil Sheets CI.l, C3.1, C5.1, LI.l
Parking Levels 1 and 2, and Schematic Section
These sheets were revised to address comments from the February 24th DRC meeting. A
brief explanation follows that addresses these comments, based on notes taken during the
meeting.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The fire access lane in front of Tower 2 from Georgia Street has been deleted.
The sanitary connections were added from the towers to the main. A new
sanitary manhole is indicated in front of Tower 2, shown on Sheet C5.1.
The angled visitor parking has been dimensioned on Sheet C3.1.
A 6' high black wrought iron fence, rather than a handrail, is proposed along
the sidewalk next to the ramp into the parking garage, shown on Sheet C3.1.
There have been two meetings with the Board at 300 Osceola. A letter of
agreement is being drafted that precedes the ingress/egress agreement. The
letter of agreement will be forwarded to you shortly.
The stripes for the 5' handicap aisles h~ ~~d, and are all the same
at all locations on Sheet C3.1 and tho--U arKillg Level Plan.
The ramp slope from the ramp entrance to the upper parking level is
calculated not to exceed 6%, shown on Sheet C3.1.
The sidewalk on Georgia Street has been extended to the property line at the
water, shown on Sheet C3.I.
6.
7.
8.
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
NESADMIN(ivMI N DSPRI NG.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
..
..
Osceola Bay Club Project
Page 2.
9. The schematic section was revised to indicate the height from the mean
property elevation 14.0 to the top of the living space as 171 feet. This height
was also added to the Site Data Table on Sheet Cl.l.
10. Perimeter fencing has been indicated on Sheet C3.l to include a 6' high
wrought iron fence with max 6 inches openings, and a 6' high masonry fence.
11. The scale has been added to the Schematic Section.
Your prompt review of this additional information will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
N HSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
~
KHR: br
cc. Mr. Rich Trela
.~Pinellas County Property APpraiifo.on: 09 2915443520020011
..
Page 1 of3
Appraisal information
Building information
Back to Search Pa e
~I N.LA~
View Comparable Residential Sales
Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using standardized procedures and
statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-
valorem tax purposes.
We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our Mass Appraisal Market Value
tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a
property for sale, especially those on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value.
Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three years prior to January 1. For this
reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will ask for a property in today's appreciating market.
Appraisal Information
09 /
29 /
15 / 44352 /
002 /
0011
14-Har- ZOO 0 JiM SMith, CFA Pine llas County Property Appraiser 08:Z1:34
Residential P rope rty Add ress. Use. and Sales
COMparable sales value Prop Addr: 301 N OSCEOLA AUE
based on historical sales Census Trac t : Z61. 00
frOM 1996 - 1998 :
78.800 Sale Date OR BOOk/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac / IMp
Plat InforMation 3 /1.997 9.639/ 586 36.800 (U) I
1894 : Book OHl Pgs 013- 11/L99Z 8.095/Z,353 76,500 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1.987 6,558/ 714 79,500 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 7 /1.987 6,534/1.818 79,500 (U) I
1999 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 64,100 HOMestead: 0 OwnerShip % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 64,100 Tax ExeMp t %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 64,100 AgriCUltural: 0
99 TAX INFO Land InforMation
Fire District: Seawall: Frontage:
Tax District: CW View:
Clearwater
99 Mi llage: ZZ.9775
Land Size Unit Land Land Land
99 Taxes: 1.472.86 Front x Depth Price Units Meth
1) 54 x 80 400.00 54.00 F
Special Tax: .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 .f~ )1
4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1';) n v n nn nn
/J -6 ( /03
F=' r l' r
http://pao..../cgi-scr3?0=1&a=1&b=I&r=&s=1 &u=0&p=09+29+ 15+44352+002+00 11241 %2C394322%2C304&nf;= ~e 193114/2q9flj
"
_, Pinellas County Property APpraiifo.on: 09 29 15 44352 002 0011
..
Page 2 of3
~I
6)
u ^
u
. uu
. uu
o x
o
.00
.00
Total Land Value:
17,112
Legal Description
JONES' SUB Of NICHOLSON'S BLK 2, N 54fT Of S 130fT
Of LOT 1
Building Information
09 / 29 / 15 / 44352 / 002 / 0011
:01
14-Har-2000 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:21:33
Res ide n t i a 1 Car dOl 0 f 1 Pro pUs e : 2 1 0 Lan d Use: OIL i v in gUn its: 1
IMP Type: Single fanily Prop Address: 301 N OSCEOLA AUE
Structural
Elements
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Roof FraMe
Roof Cover
Pie rs
Wood
frane/Siding
Gable-Hip
Asbestos/Wood Shngle
# Stories 1.0
Floor Finish Crpt/HdTI/HdHar/Prqt
Interior FiniSh Dryuall/Plaster
Quality
Year Built
Effective Year
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Average
1,932
Built 1,970
Central Duct
Cooling (Central)
8
o
o
o
Sub
Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 1.415 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch .20 48 8) .00 0
3) Detached Base-Senifi 1. 00 240 9) . 00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Residential Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) fIREP LAC E 2,500.00 2 5,000 2,000 1,956
2) .00 0 380 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VA L U E : 2,000
http://pao.../cgi-scr3?0=1&a=l&b=I&r=&s=1 &u=0&p=09+29+ 15+44352+002+00 11241 %2C394322%2C304&name= Vie 03/14/2000
'~R-13-00 MON 02".4INOMPSONOFAMILY .3, 3 ~ ~'
~.' ~-6-/Jz~
j~..~~
PI
~ 7'(f Ie; C; 1 -f-a-;c
~~ ~.:..~~ ~
~- ~/ ~ ~~-~
~~~~' Jlf~J
/~ '7~' ~~
~. ~ ~~~a~. ~
-# ~ fSfF- rJ. ~y~ ()3~s-. ~
~ ~~ -h:, ~(/ UA~
~ --h~J. ~-~~
8! ~~. FILE
. /~J-0
, r
~AR-13-00 MON 02:44 P.HOMPSON.FAMILY 3 P.02
N.. IC D VALOREM TAXE~ & NON.AU VALUHt:MJI'::S.I::N I::;
~ LEASE DETACH AND KEEP FOR Y RDS W. FRED PETTY, CFC
~ Fi REVE~&E SIDE FOR INSTRUC AD VALOREM TAXE TAX COLLECTOR. PINELLAS COUNTY
f999 REAL ESTATE TAX NOTICE/RECEIPT FOR PINELLAS COUNTY RE 54265-4
I'AY IN U,S. fUNDS TO TAX COLLECTOR, PINELLAS COUNTY- P.O. BOX 172a - CLEARWATER, FL33757-1729 - (727) 464-5540
[- IF NOV. 30 DEC. 31' JAN. 31 FEB. 29 MAR. 33
POSTMARKED 1,413.95 1,428.67 1,443.40 1,458.13 1,472.86
BY:
~ · · . 'T I ERIE
l 060 CW 22.9775 COUNTY-AGGREGATE 6.5010
~ ' .' . . ': SCHOOL-STATE LAW 5.9970
l 64,10 0 64,100 SCHOOL-lOCAL BD. 2.6690
-_. CITY 5.5032
SW fLA WTR MGMT. .4220
PINELLAS ANCLOTE .4010
PIN.CO.PLN.CNCL. .0225
JUV. WELFARE BD. .8117
SUNeST. TR.AUTH. .6501
w
o
~ FARCEL NO: 09/29/15/44352/002/0011
z ~ITE ADDR: 301 N OSCEOLA AVE
~ ~ARION, CARISA M
2 1325 AR80R AVE
~ LOS ALTOS CA 94024-5332
::J
o'
I
416.72
384.41
171.08
352.76 0
27.05 c:
25.70 \J
c
1.44 (')
52. 03 ~
41.67 m
Z
5l
(')
m
NOTICE OF AD VALOREM TAXES & NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS
1999 REAL ESTATE TAX NOTICE/RECEIPT fOR PINELLAS COUNTY RE 54265-4
PAY IN U.S. FUNDS TO TAX COLLECTOR PINELLAS COUNTY- PO BOX 1729' CLEARWATER Fl33757-1729 - (727) 464-5540
(MAR. 31
3 __ 1,472.86
~ L 352/0~;;D01 ~ g
@ l ~?~~~~--_. ../ ~
~~~ /J~~~~' O~1:A~~~~ ~
o BlK 2, N 54FT Of S 130FT ) ~
Of LOT 1 /
,......--- ---._.~__~_.___,.--,--~--- 1I.1,"1..1II111111.1.11I1,llllIIlIlI' t11111.1"I.l.lil"lIllI
THIS IS A DUPLICATE STATEMENT ABOUT YOUR ASS~$$MENT AND TAX. YOUR TAX BILL HAS BEEN SENT TO
YOUR ESCROW AGENT FOR PAYMENT. seE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS
lEVYING AUTHORITY RATE
w
o
g
z
w
~
2
..J
n.
:;)
c
, .
IF NOV. 30 DEC. 31 .., 31
JAN. FEB. 29
POSTMARKED 1,413.95 1,428.67 1,443.40 1,458.1
BY:
......-.... -'-~'--""~ ~---'--'~'-
1111;\..<<11. . . . . . . . ,
I 060 CW 22.9775 v'. PARCEL NO: 09/29/15/44
. . . . . , , = SITE ADDR: 301 N OS
64,10q 0 64,100
--, ..J' ..._~_._.
***********MIXED AADC 335
MARION, CARISA M
1325 ARBOR AVE
LOS ALTOS CA 94024-5332
AMOUNT
o
c
-u
r-
(5
~
m
Z
~
o
m
SEG.II:139292
..
..
.
..
r~
tA /3to1 Mati~
. /1 n.
ca({c;.v.. /1Jf ~
\3~~ ff~ ~~Dt+
.
. CITYOfCLEAKWA"
AFFIDAVIT TO AUl110RlZ~mr
l'IANNIl"fG 1& DE\'D,DPMENl' SIIlVlCES AnMlNlSTJL\TION
MU!lIaPALSlRVICIS JlJD,.l)lNG, 100 SDU11I MYKJ1J! AVDJVIi,"- fJ,OOIIl.
JIllONIi (TZ1~7 fAX (7Z1) su...s16
P.02/02
JAN-20-2000 13:37
STATE OF F\..CIIUDA
COUIf'f" OF p*cu.M
Geozce R*hder~/Grecn Co~uer Inc,~~nBe~ Pro~er~\e3,MOrriohi11,
.....W1P"llC11f--J Osceola Prope'C'ti... Inc-
TdC
1. that (I am/INe are) the l*tOr(s) If'ld reconi tiDe hOIder(I) 0I1he follollM9 de$Cl'ibed property:
ADllltf!SS 011 GElIIERAL. LCCA T\ON:
3l2.3l~.400 '404 Dsceola Ave
2. Thallhis prapeI'tY oonMlIUln the property for which a request for a:
Be51denti.a1 De~e\op.en~
~......~
3. That tt1e under$igned (ha5lhave) -appointed end (daesldol eppoint -
Richard Trela of Osceola I., Development LtC
.~...., ._..,..............--... --v...............,
4. That Utis Bffidavit has nen ..cuted to induce the City of CIHIWfIt8r, Florida to consider and ac:t
on the aboVe descr1b8d property;
~_ . (....)~ T: - ","IIy-'" _ino;......... ~,....
( ( ! ~ $fATE OF fLORIDA., COUNlY Q.F .,N&LlA&
SlC ~~ ~M'JI"!'E'~-~~mctlliS 1~'1J:", _yo'
George RUden VJ-'I.I!J/I1~ .A.D..~~tollle""
II) . wilD is ~t
SlCNID ~ 0lIIWl
SIQNED~~
11_~o.o.,
6. ~ Mlchlllle SV\A1ile
~.s*..., commiSsion CC1731.'
.. Elql/fa OctODe' 19. 200Z
~WO~
. :,.' .
I'
I
r:::J (r~ I r~ \1 \\ ,/ ~ -= ,--
~~b~~/~1
Ii
'I ,
fi5)~~~ll~f6'
1I11~ ~I". 'OiillY)
JAN Z 0 2000
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT -
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
TOTAL P.02
--
-
v..
IIJ:':
.
CITY OF CLEARW ATKa
AFFIDAVIT TO AL1"fJlORTZE AG~"
PLANNJNG . JaVELOJI'MEN'r SEIlVlCES ADMINISTKAnON
MU.NIOI'AL BVlC2IS 1t.'JI.DlNO. 100 SOU1lI Mn'lU "VF.."'lt.'l>, r' FlOOR
lBONti ~7)-j&2 4$'7 PAX (7Z7) ~76
STAT! OF F~
ctJUNfV OF "NIUAS
Matkoplois Antonios
(11_01111 P"'P""Y-)
1, rnac (11ImJwe are) the owncr(s) and record title hOlder(s) of lhe following <JBwibed property:
,I,ODMESSOf\GlIIIl'RALLOCA'!'ION. 303 08ceo\a 400-410 Janes St-r....t
2. Tt'I8t this property conlllitulea the propetty fclr which a requeat far II.
Residential Davelopment
(NIIIft II-..q
3. Thai the unders!gned (hasltlave) 8PQOinted and (doMIdo~ aoooint
&icha~d T~ela ot Osceol"a Bay Developmen~'LLC,
- 0-.., iIOIftl\Il................. Of - _.....-.y.............
4. That thl. affidavit MS been ellscuted 10 inciJce the City of Clearwater, rlotida to consider and a<:t
on the abOve delCl'lbed property;
li(;NI,l) <"'-"" ~
undel1ligned authority. hel'&by certify that the foregoing is true and wnect.
ITATI Of FI.ORtDA, COUNTYrO~\BINELLA8
6Wuln lu and ~ Wort me lIIIa _:1'" day of
~ "(""(.a ,.,.IJ,~~to me 8IIdJor
lit f\' <: -Cl\71i ~ ~1Il1 ~ iaJ!Cll'SClRllly
-= "~pAICIucad
enllllClllioll.
~hi\])C\~ -~
......, MIlO.
..,-...-
lIGfD"'-'ro.-l
MHID(I'nofooIIy 0..)
JAN20
.....~....... Barbara G. Barnes
:~~~jf\,~~ MYCOMMISSIONICC746349 EXPIRE~/
't.', 'r.: June 6, 2002
"'t.~...~ 'Ili BONOEDlHRU11lOYFAlNINSU~~NC
',Hr..\6'
~Q)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
/
I
1"
~~n~. "
~~~
.!J,,,!: -,1-"
...~\,
. '.,. - \:.'
" -.11-
ClT\' OF CLEAiw~
.AFF.D)A VlT To A.V'I7IOJUZE AGENT
IUNMNG .. DEVILOIMKNT au YI\;U AlJMINDn'I&ATJO~
~arAL _VIalS 8UJLDINO, 100 SOU'Dl In'UU! A Ymft.1B, Jool PI..O()&
JIIClIfI ~ "", fAX ~ 56)-4576 ...
ITAft OIl PLCHUDA
COUN1V OII....ILLM
~.lcolm Croft leverty Cro(~
--.
(IMI 1ft .1lI'fiIlIY......
1. That (I amlWe ate) the CJWnef(s) and record title OOIc*(s) of the fotlDwlnG dalc:rtbed propeny:
AOOIttn OIl G'Nf"1lAI. LOC-' TlON.
304-30~ Osceol. Ave.
2. That thIS property oonSlltulel Ih. property for which. requeat for .:
neeidentlal Development
(N_ Ill.....
--- .,_'"
3. That the underalgned (huJhlw) eppolnted and (doelldo) lpPOint ,
JUctlard Trell of Olclo1' "I.!:velWu.en..t:"
II ~...., 11__..,...... ......,__... ~. .....--
.. That thflllflldavtl has been executed 10 induce the City d Cle.....er. rloric:ta to oonIidor and act
on the IbOW d'ecrlbed property;
s.
I"Iby certify thIIl the foregoing ~ true and COO'ect.
ITAn Of FLOfUDA, COUNlY Of ,..wau..u
tu And ~ before me.. ~O.... lM10f
. A . -~me andIOI
Iar . who is plllSONII,
IIIOwn fill JI"Odul!lIII
".~n.
IIOHID
>> verly croft
iiiiNiD.....,o;;r-- .
c/~~Le
....... ScSli.o. dtv -
~_._.~.-.-"
-~~:,~:~~~
itJ.
,J U'
L---- -
ALLEN T:ce""~RST
$OUCrrQA~
McDWAY HOUBI!
18-22 qANTeWpe ROAD
eAST OA'NST~D. w. SUSSEX
Rf11$ alitJ
Tel: 01342 O~i5~) / :'!5877
(Dl(: 3QOC:: r..' '" .... I~," .. "'''', ....~. e., D)
, ~.-+ .........-' ~ .
~~6
PLl\~;~JI:-'C .'. .. '
SEri'.. t '-
C1TY cr-
,-- ~' ..-
'-":'.."
:t
I"lAR-28-00 TUE 11 :29 Al".:rHONPSO"'l. ,.ANILY :3 .
. ,..
03/ l4/l!(HHI 11: ,)6 457& 1"1.611 p~ A~
..---- -_.. .-. CITYOFCLEARWATe. --- "
. AFFIDA.VIT TO Al,JTHORl~E AGENT
· J'LANNlllQ "))~IMENT 1DV11:1'.S ~TRA.TION
_ J,f\Jl'/1CJf~ .IP-....ces~. 100 IO'U'rR Mnn.JI ,4~. 2-1ll.OOI\
"'- PHONI~m-"~7 PAX('m)"1~
P.02
aTAT. M ~ftA
COUNTY OF PINtIL.LAa
C~r;~ Ha...r; 00
ltMfNIlft .. "..,.....-1
1. That (I amtwe ere) the ownor(.) and I"lC01'd litl. hOld-(I) of (he fOIlOWil'\Q deactlbtd Pf~rty;
W)"U' (llI\ <MNfiIW. ~oci.1tOM;.......- , "3 l) I n $(eol.AJ~.:v_e~
e~(\4U~~. ~1Yl !"3 3 7 S-S"
... 2. That this property wnslitutes the property fot whk;h a request for Ii:
. ...... ......-...- '.
..
~~QS,o e...rti.~rL. cf)€~tLlQ12m~,..J-r:
.....-.-...... ..~
I_d~
3. Thal tM undersigned (hall11ave) appointed Ind (clo.s/do) appoint
'K IG,hMO -r~J.A ~ OScS~t.A &+:t D~cfMc.1-J1.
..lIlllo.IfI....-,q.l tt-.... .................___~tttI!W...... JIIIIIoI\:
-4. ll'Iat thit affldevit hili b"^ elC9CUt.d to ind~ tho City of Cleal'Wllter, F/Mda to consider and act
on ... .bav. deao1bed pro~;
5. ~ (lIw8!, the ~~~<J .u~ity. tweby certify thot tf\O foregoIng I. true and c;orrect.
~:~<..J r~~ TATt or I'1.OAIDA. COUN1'YOF PlNEUA8
_OHI!O ~ 0wIw) t.om 10 and ..fate 1M "* day of
A.O.. ,. \0 m. tndIot
\lIII\O It pllIOI'I./I,
IlGNUJ I~ 0Wl\et)
Ilnowft I\U ~
IItldellUftealIO".
_~I!O ("..,rj ClooooNtI
.
a~"'lOl"~~1
M*'Y
,..,~.....,
STATE Of CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
SUBSCRlAE AND SWORN TO ME
~~~~~
NOTARY PUBLIC
f",....~...,......;;,.';N...;....'''....''HNHNh'H~
~ ."''' SANDRA K. FARNHAM 0
- COMM.1241671 ',;l
~ NOTARY PU81IC. CALIFORNIA ...
.... SANtA WFIA COUNTY ~
!,ll ,="""", e,plre' "lOll IS. 2003 ~
_"',.HHhlI'Y....-....~
~
l:O'd
dZI=EO OO-~t-~.w
-
FROr-l: ~j"" ",~...:._ F'HC!tIE rlO. :
.. . .,:..1 ~ .' -:.....:.::...-...-.--n-. ~---
L--'i !\ -i n 1--(~0~ '''1'- II - ~_I~II t,l -[I! ~j
. !. ..~ Ii I" ~ . r -.'"
t .' . ri q, ~ ~f
,j" fi B' I IS 11" I'l ?! -,
:.;('!~! 11 ~ I I .~ [ I ~.: t~' !~,~ '~,;:r"-
~~~ !!i ~ I _
:8' ',1 I I
I I : ..1 ~ <1 ,
: J: : ~ -) 1.... r -- . : .
I~JI' ~iil
) ~I i . ~e'.i
./ "1\ \ iil ,.
C. .\ \
~. 1\ \ I~
t ! \\~
.. .. --.:...b;<,r:\-j '~.l
--=-1: I
r~r Ii,
I.
'j:
....... :)'
t ",
. HUL 17 2~00 03:3SPt1 F'l
r:;~t' ',.5~.~i~
· ...... .t\.
I
!
i
I
,/
~
~
~
~.
~
I
,.,
~ ~ P L ^ T T E G
... I'V
~
.
"
~
Sl
;g ~
(])~ i
~O
ola
... I ,
.t!.U
~
'\)
~O)'7'1'(~:
rnttl
....
r"~
~'-(
".....
""'0
~
I''!
~
-__.1r.I;1ll.
'J,,,(-t
.-
-=r
I /1 Jt
~~ 11 ~ ~ i.:
;1 j i :
~ i ~ /','. q" ~t
I : I
I ; :.... 'j j
1........1 '\,.1, \:
; \.-----) II~l t ~I ,;
-:.,-;1 ~ 111'_ . I I I '
-=---.Jlj ,IL I ...._...._.,...((~,
-_.~lJ. ..' I
_...__.-.~_.-.---_....__._.-:-: =..~_._.. _.~~.~::--:~._. ..-t.-.-.-
,
I
/
'-101..
- .-
GEORGJA~
$
r
S TI R E E T
----,
I
,
:2
~
~
r::-:--::.-;;;- (G ~-O-~!1 re:;' ~\
"',,- ,\ "= C 1(" ;r. \
~'. "I IS ':::::7 _:<' \ I l.
'[~----- '. \ ,
" r ti ... I f
~ t .// f!, : ~,l
I "'''. ~_ ~, I ~ I, ,
\.... [ l\ I J A N 1 7 2000.. \,.,\". ...i.'.'. if.
lIlll 1[') \
-d
F!
f'~'
~
-O(~
en
(')
:r
m
3::
)>
~
C/)
~
-;
o
z
~ ~ ~
~l~ ~: rl~
~ '10 "II: . ;
I
.
.
~i ~ ~
~i t= ~
I; I f!
J
I I
. I I , . I i I I : " .
,,' ;..;[::L:A~(~ ~~r.~;!'::!!:~- ? ~'-II 9-11' ,-~": ~- -Ir.' -11' .....-0. '1/1",1". J&f-;r : ~~} . 'l"'~:.!!:,;..!f" .or,
.,__...___ .---.." . ....--. lllI~-' - . . . ..._____._0,. '". :.... :... .,::
!;~
;';d IJd'::;l:c::m (;KlG.::: ~ ~ -till;
IO"d
~
eN "'(J1 0' ...... CD
~O~~~~lft~~~~~ 2
L:.:~;~. .""
r----..
Lr---""'~' .
-n
(\\...
.~
C-
)>-
Z
......
00'
"'lllIlII
"1
....
1.__
'U'-II "
: IU
(QJ
Ifij
,
D
\
o
f
=
~
'"'~
_.... ;lru
(~~~.:'21
'OI.J 3NUHd
I'..)
Co:)
c::>
C>
: ~~Ud.=l
dS9:90 OO-LI-Ul?('
Norlhsille
&~S~ 1Ht,
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
April 17, 2000
City of Clearwater
Planning & Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle A venue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attention:
Mr. Mark Parry
Ms Lisa Fierce
FILE COpy
Reference:
Osceola Bay Club Project
Case FL 00-01-03
Subject:
Transmittal of Site/Civil Drawings
Dear Mr. Parry and Ms Fierce:
Transmitted with this letter are the following:
15 Each
15 Each
4 Each
Site/Civil Sheets C1.1, C3.1, C5.1, L1.1 (Revision Date 04/11/00)
Parking Levels 1 and 2, and Schematic Section (Revision Date
04/11/00)
Osceola Avenue Right of Way Vacation and Realignment
Your prompt review of these revised sheets will be greatly appreciated.
Sincere ,
N HSIDE ENGIN
--
G SERVICES, INC.
KHR:br
cc. Mr. Rich Trela
LANNING & DEVELOPMENT
P SERVICES
crN OF CLEARWATER
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
NESADMI N(iijMI NDSPRI NG.COM
N ESTECH((uMI N DSPRI NG.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
Northsile
~~ 11ee.
--
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVIRONMENTAL -
TRANSPORTATION -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To:
City of Clearwater
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
JAN 2 1 2000
Date: January 20, 2000
PLANNING
Attn: Mark Parry
City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services
Reference: Osceola Bay Club Project
NES #: 9958
Subject: Transmittal of Revised Site Development Plans
Dear Mr. Parry:
Pursuant to our meetings and conversations, herewith we submit the following for the DRC:
13 Each
1 Each
1 Each
5 Each
3 Each
3 Each
Revised Site/Civil Drawings C3.1
Residential Infill Project Criteria for Osceola Bay Club
3 Affidavits authorizing Richard Trela as the authorized agent re: ROW Vacation
Renderings of Osceola Bay Club
Parking Layout
Landscape Plan L 1.1
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any other questions or comments.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
By: IS I
Kenneth H. Roush, P .E.
Copies To: File
Richard Trela
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727. 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
Norlhsille
&~ s~ 11ee,
.
RIGHT OF WAY
VACATION REQUEST
SUBMITTAL
FOR
OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
BY
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL.
TRANSPORTATION.
OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC
January 2000
Prepared By
~
I Kennet~~. ,Roush, P.E.
I~~
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727.443 .2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
FILE
FL-CO-()l--~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF CLEARWATER - ENGINEERING SERVICE
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE - ROOM 211
P.O. BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FL. 33758-4748
PH. (813) 562-4750, FAX (813) 562-4755
FORM NUMBER
1311-0104
F I L I N G
REQUEST
FORM
VACATION
1.
NAME OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE:
NAME: Osceola Bay Development. LLC
PHONE: 727 - 804-1417
ADDRESS: 100 Pierce St. Suite1101 Clearwater, FL 33755
HEREBY PETITION THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE
VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING:
o
D
OTHER
D EASEMENT TYPE:
DALLEY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
2.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED, IE: IF IT IS A PORTION OF
AN EASEMENT, DESCRIBE WHICH PORTION, IF IT IS AN ALLEY, DESCRIBE FROM
WHERE TO WHERE OR WHAT LOTIS IT ABUTS, IF IT IS A RIGHT-OF-WAY
DESCRIBE HOW MUCH TO BE VACATED.
Entire length of Osceola Ave. between north ROW of Jones St. and
south ROW of Georgia St. The ROW has irregular width.
3.
STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION:
Osceola Ave. between Jones St. and Georgia St.
4.
PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY:
As part of Osceola Bay Club development: pavement, parking and landscaping
5.
ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY:
HDR
FILE - VACATION REQUEST FORM REVISED
FILLING FORM.ENG 08/13/97
0- Printed on r P GE
eqded ..pet
A 1 OF 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.ATTACHMENTS:
X LAND SURVEY OF PROPERTY IS REQUIRED IF THIS VACATION INVOLVES AN
EXISTING ENCROACHMENT.
.
.
'.
.,
X DRAWING SHOWING PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY
(SURVEY, PLOT PLAN, ETC.)
X FILING FEE PER ORDINANCE NO. 5969-96;
$500.00 FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY / ALLEY OR $400.00 FOR AN EASEMENT
THE FOLLOWING LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE REQUIRED:
(LIST OF CONTACT PERSONS FOR THE UTILITIES IS ATTACHED)
X FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
X GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
X GTE - AMERICAST
X TIME WARNER CABLE
OTHER
r. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE PRINT)
NAME: Osceola Bay Development, lie PHONE: ~04-141jJ
FL 33755
8. OWNERS SIGNATURE
STATE OF FLORIDA)
COUNTY OF PINELLAS)
by
KJd1a.rd S. T;Jldv
personally
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (~
~~ produced as identification
and ~?o didl~~e an oath.
CoInmiMDD #00 116t1t Notary Public, Commission No. c.C 97~9~
~ ~ 5t"
'.. _~..... Q (Name of Notary typed, printed or stamped]
~Q~ ~
FILE - VACATION REQUEST FORM REVISED
FILLING FORM.ENG 08/13/97
o Printed on PAGE 2 OF 3
IK)'Cled ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
JON B S S.!..R !... IT
.
t " ", .'.... ...... '>,
\--~ ...... ....,.. """ ""'., .'-....., ,.~....... ""'\"" ~'\.
',....... "'. "-. ~" , ",
I. .....", -..... ", ....., '-.. \"
j I ....,'''., ',.,.... '-'>.",' ", '. --"'.,. "<""'~ -"~'...
,{. , " ' '. " ' '" "
..~"' ........., '....... ".",""'.... ..... ....."'\. ......
I "'\. "'~"'" "" '."1,., -..,...,.., "'"" ..........., '......"""
I ~'\... -....... ~....." ........'-. '\~ '"\"-.. ',..... ....."....
I , '.. , , ~' , '-
1 .'\., "... ......\. -....... ......... "-.... '\,\. ........
; 1. \, \'.... ...... ...... .'...... ..... ....., "'. ....
; II ~ "" '" ", '-"'" ", "', "
~ ,~.... \.. '\ "1.1... " ...... "',
$ .."" '-.,"\. " ',,- '\ ....,
t:::.. \" ...., '''',- " "... ...., ....., .'\.....
I ',,- '\., '-" " ".. ' '
...., '"" '. ".
n "',-. "'.
r-"\
j
,.8.J:~",""'1
.. { ~
I '
. .
I I
I I
t 1
{ ,/'" ~
..I I I "
\11 " I ~
~I ~ ! i
1, ~ I
~Il I ,./
\ I i.
I ! \
I ! \
) i \
..,.,....>l\''t;,,(:\.~ ~
~..,. ~~
.. .....-..",
,-"ll
III
I II
__II f
--..;: -.-" !
", '. '," "" '" I
,'\', "'.,' '" ,.'
'\., \~, '........ ~, ....., ". ~'., .... .... '-.. '. '\. '" -....... ", \...... -",,'
, " " " " " " ~ .. " " ,.. ,-". '-, '
" " " ", "" -, '-', " " ". 1', '. " " , " "4
'\ "', -.." "-,,,.. '... O",.....J '\"..,'......
, "" '", """ "'-,,, "... '" '" '. ", I" ,,', "'-, '\, "" '"J
'''-'\, ....."" ......~ \....~ ......".. '\...., ......., ''''~''I. \,.,- '..... "', " '\ ".....\ \".., ", \,-'\", ~, 1
" ',"\. ,,', ". "', " " ''-. '- "\, '> "" " '. "I
,','-"" ... ,'\ ">""1
~. " ~~ '\........ '\", "', " "',_ ", "-.. ".... '\.... '- ''\ -." ...." I
, ' '. " " ',' ",',",,, ". " " ' ", 'j
" "." .,., '. "" , '." ',', \, "" ',', ". ,,', '-, I
..... .... ~ ",- ';. "... '~, '"\ ........, '.. "\,...~ ", ....... I., .,," '" ' "'. '.
, " ',- '-, '" '.., '" ',"-, "\." '" "'" ". '" \,,'" '"'''''' ~ "-
...... "', ... ......~ ...... " '....... ..., ....... '\. '\..."" .......... "'\ '.... ' ... , ..... ""'"'....., ....t"" ~'"
'::-' ''''><''''><'''',,'',,><''<''0' , "'<".,,""<">"" ,,"..<,<''''~t<>...
"" ~ "'... "", ~ --....." "'" "~ "..., ",.'",~,"', .\... "'... .... '- ...., "'-, "~\"" ',,-
", 'bQ " '.'. " "'. "', ",M \', '~' '" ',,- '''. "', '-." ", . .\. ", "" "" -.., ", ')
, , " ", '\. " ", "."" "" '-. "',', '-'.', ',,",' "-l
"- 'r.) '" " " ", ' '-, " "', "'\" '- " "" ", '" '" '\. ... " <
," ','" '" '" " "', '..', ''-.'' \. ", ~' ';'.... ", ""'-" '-"... "'- " "", "',I
,"...~<,,~,,\><..,:-~,., "<'<>~: <'<'" ,.><" l "'-'.>'><"'" <~'>~g
"\ ~ '\", " ..... "i ...... ''''~ "\ ......' ... ......, '"' .... ... " '\.. ' ... ..... ~ ", iJ1
, \",a-C"" "', "" """ ", "\, ~"" ""., "",, ",- '-, '" " ',', '" '.., '" '''ill' '''~:
,'" " ' " ' " " "- " " '> . , " " " , t> '- "
~" ',. '" " '>, ", (It" '''''' '"..... ", 'tI "", ".., "",,- "\. ", " ",. '''''', ""--iZ
... -.:: " ....., ....... " ............... ,,~ '..." '\,. . \, "\ -.". .... ~, ....... '\ .... ,II
'.... ~\ " ..., "- ",,, "....... '\ ..."....... .......... ..., \,~ ..... ..." ...." " " "\ ~...... If
" ~'- ...., \'" ............. ............ ..,...... ......., .. ,,-" "'.... ........... '\., ~."\. ""', ',,- ....., 'i~
" , ",,', ," ' ..., " " , " " , ' , " ,," ,', '- ',,' '- -.1"
.........., .....'''-,...'\......,...,,, ~'.... ""-.....'" ,......
..... .......... ...~ \, '",- "-. " '\. ',""" ......."\..., "', '\...".......' ......,.
" ~ ....", ...,...., '... ".. ...... '\.. ....... "... ...., ...,'.... ........ ,'" " ", ....." ....,....... ..'....., " '.... !~
, '--~" " '-, " "-, " '" "',' ," ,,' "-', ',', '. '. ", " " '-!~
'" ~ "1\ ...... .....\, ...... ....... '\....... ............. "'........ "... " ...... ........ "....... -".~ \'," ", '.., !
\....,.. ..., --.....',,, .....~ ~..... ....".. "'I,...... '\ '\ "-.......'.. ""~"'" '''', '\ '\ '....... ''-f
....." ~\. '. I.,'\. "\ \'.... ......, '''''' ......... ".. '-, '" " " ,,"'......." '............,,, '."'-. '\... "', I
... ..... ......, " " .... -'. ...... ,~'.... '\., <-, ..... 1\, ....... ...", " ... "'. " ......... ... ........ "~1
", ...'".~" '" " ... " \, ....'\ ......... '\....., '... ... ..... "\ ...... -, ... '.... .......... .... ~ '.. ;
','~ ..'...... "\..,. "....,...., '''..... '"', .........\ ~.....\., .,"\ ...., ""...., ".......... \'\, "-........... " ......... "" .......... "'''''', \....... """'\,1
'''-", "~'\'" "'...., ..,.'\. '\....'''',',''- "",," . "" """", """ " "-""" ',.,..."'" ",,""'--'" "'", "--"."''-, '...",,J
'. ~ , ' , , , ,,'. ,.... "."" '- '\, " ' ,
~. .,~ "..... ".. '\'..... .."...... "\'\ '~.... " "'\ ........., ...,.... ". '\..,. .......... "'",. ""... '", .'\.... "... " '.... "'..,. \" ....,., i
........, ,\, .'.... "', '''-.., "" '....... >--...., '\. " ....". \....... .......... ",,\., .......... '~" '." ........ ", ....\'... ~" \.... \.{
" " .......\.. '\, ",\ '" 1.... '~'" '\'-".., '" ~'.'-.. ............. '. '\.. '.... ,. .......... '... "\, "",, '......., ...., ""'..... .........., ....".... I
"'''''" '~, -...,,~ '\..,'.. \,\.. ~'.......... "\... ..........."",,' "-.~"'" ,."'\... ....,..... --"'- ..,......, '" "-........ '-..\ .........." "'..,,\. '\.., '" ...." ""f
,,' '....."" ,'''''.... ,"', ..""""....')1
... \, ", " .... " --" \. -..... .. '. .... ""'" . ..... -..... ..... '. ',- '" " \ ...... "" -,
......., .'\ .'....... '\ '" ""'" ''-'.... \.,'-. ';, " ", "\. ".... " -....,\ ......, .......... '\ .. ',. '\ ...~. ')~
.... , ", . -- t
./
-_../
r-1J l ID
\ 1M r-
I I .~ "', "'
I ! ~ ' \.,
~ I .:. "'.
I I (i)
L I I :1 ". "'
,_J :Ie
L-L l""J Of!
\ Z
wi ;I",
~d ~!:l CI
...
1ft
Q
1 i
i
II ,
~I
;1 t
~\
, ~
j
;
.~!
: i~
@!~~!!i(~LAN.' pro:
W" OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
W 4OO.-cEOLA AVENUI!
.
... CUlARWA1'I!R. PLORIDA lIS7U
~~lJ~.,...:.::;.~1 ~..:tl:P1J?:.....':....:~.'.;..'ffft.. II. NerlhSld!
~ ~ .. ::H:~tt;:rwm".: II f f
,." '..........'......."..j......""'..,.....'... '''IN. ' ~ .
\:; , : ! : '. Ii; I ' i i '" i:',."J'~-~ ...,w<<u. ~,
, f 1t. ~ ; . , j j 1 ( ; l i ! I. II E ' ::.:N'at. .. A.~,_ *,l~)\ilZMU. W' lfrl...l,~"""~"'.Af'" '~A\OftP6llII:'t'AI'1:ll')rc
. :~ 1,\ : ( i i i j i i i j :, II. :r:.:.=".......-_ a::.=.==r.-:=
.
.
Send Confirmation Report
Name: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
10: 7274468036
18 Jan 00 2:04PM Page
Job Start Time
Usage
Phone Number or ID
Type
Send..............
Pages Mode
Status
184
1 /18
2:03PM
0'46" 5794981....................
1 /
96 Completed.......................
Total
0'46"
Pages Sent:
Pages Printed: 0
9E08 . _ . aL XY~ 698t . E'" . Lt/.
WO"'NI~dsa NIW@I..l:>l.1.SlN
WOT"NI~dsaNlw@Nlwa...slN
<9LEE ...al~01~ .Ul.1....MU...ll'
avo\! ~3H::lHI H.1.flOS to(
:)u.::!. :018;)~d~');)
698r-t~~ !.Lu) ~v A1!llVIOiWWlI t1JId.iO SIH~ AdUON
dSVd'ld 'U:L\I3JtIlI A 1!llVn01l0V NlIlIB WN SVH 'IV.Lill\ISNVlIl. 5nu dO NOU~Od ANY dI
'SIUi1UlUICJ;J .1(1 UlO!INfmb .J.~/.mf ..om "'<tDI/ nOt! PlnCt(s 8:111/0 !.1'il1;mlUl.K) 01 fllV/~GtH/ IOU op a$IJ~lJ
'no,{~mnu
'lSon~ posodOJd '!ljl OJ
~>>~I..UO!l~fqO ON" 8 :JP!AOJd ;lll~ld 'UO!lll'08A AVA\}O )qi,J S!lp,jO IJvd li'B ~~I~;,q Of. JXl;)U AIUJ iOH!UJO
'SJ;iIQ4S 8!~ plD! g~UOr uag~1XI '1001'1 S!1(:J U! ;AV 'BI~JO 1583 3\P OJ 4J.,.~wd
oljlllMO qnlJ ""B "10:00<{} pOI "uuy OO!I'^l"S "'lL 'OAV I,OOOS() JO ".,. .ljl OJ AlJodOJd Oljl lIMO qUI;) ""a
"10005{) pUB SUR1!U!lDopm>O Ii!IO~O lpJON OOE '.(UM)O Jqll!J :>tp JO UOHt:'IO[ :np S;,)!r.)!PU! q~s piqoeue iQ.L
.3EJ'VSS3~-
8,66# SaN
ru11J Ava V1011JSO :O'U"'J'1l
mwl..UO!J~rqo ON..llO!lR:)RA ARfrAJO lqi'rn :3lI
3'd 'l.l'&noH 'H 11l:HJu.'t}l :wOJd:
186~-6L> '# "'d
;;Isnt>llMa~UlApV~l~Ua J;WVI\\ ;tlI!.L
"SIOJJ 11005
'O~
Wd OE' I "'.IJ~
I JO I :oBvd
ooor .u.nulr 81
;;Q~a
''<f.L1.I~SNV~J... 3'1~IS::JV.:I
. NOI.LV.lHOdSNV\l..l
. 'V.LNJWNO'l:UAN:I
el)NINNVld ONV1
.11^1~
.~~~
"PI$QUIM
I-
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Send Confirmation Report
Name: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
10: 7274468036
18 Jan 00 2:21PM Page 1
Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or 10 Type Pages Mode Status
193 1 /18 2:20PM 0'55" 5794981.......................... Send.............. 1 / 1 96 Completed............................. . . . . . . . . . .
Total
0'55"
Pages Sent: 1
Pages Printed: 0
;;::-'::11 Ii I
~u
ClI II el
Z _Ii
III U
; ~I
m
Norlhsille
&~ Sewiee4- 111e,
e
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVIRONMENTAL -
TRANSPORTATION -
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Date:
18 January 2000
Page: 1 of 1
Time: 1:30 PM
TO:
Scott Creasy
Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse
Fax #: 579-4981
From: Kenneth H. Roush, P.E
RE: Right of Way Vacation "No Objection" Letter
Reference: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NES #9958
-MESSAGE-
The attached sketch indicates the location of the right of way. 300 North Osceola condominiums and Osceola
Bay Club own the property to the west of Osceola Ave. The Salvation Army and Osceola Bay Club own the
property to the east of Osceola Ave in this block between Jones and Georgia Streets.
Utilities may need to be relocated as part of this right of way vacation. Please provide a "No Objection" letter
to this proposed request.
Thank you.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further questions or comments.
IF ANY PORTION OF THIS TRANSMITTAL HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY RECEIVED, PLEASE
NOTIFY THIS OFFICE IMMEDIA TEL Y AT (727) 443-2869
Copies To: File
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
N ESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
I
I I
Name:
.
.
Send Confirmation Report
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES ID: 7274468036
18 Jan 00
2:05PM Page
I
Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status
185 1/18 2:04PM 0'32" 4421561 ... .................... ... Send.............. 11 1 EC 96 Complet ed........................................
I
Total
0'32"
Pages Sent: 1
Pages Printed: 0
I
9(01 . ,.. , LU XV~ "8f . (I>?' LU
WO::>'')NI1I4S0NIw8H::>l.l.SJN
WO"')NI1I4S0Nlw!IilNIWOVSJN
ovar VOlllO'~ 'lIUVMlIV1"
C1VOlllllH'''' H.I.I'OS to(
I
OlM :D~ SOldo;)
I
698Z-!:ty lLU) J. V A 1lLL VIOIIWI'jI 3;JWO SlHJ. AdlJ.ON
gSVll1d 'OO^13:>3lI A T:lJ.vnoaav N!l8B J.ON SVH 'JVJ.LIJ'ISNVlI,L SIHJ. JO NOll.lIOd ANY'dl
'_.m__b""'lIJ'f/Mm """'I"""PfIIDI/<o"fI/i1'1'1I_"'''''''''llO'' ""-IJ
I
.no.< ~lf8IU
'lIOI1bu pnodoJd '!111 <II
_ .UO!1OOf<l0 ON.. , _d.....d '1IIl9""^ .....JOut8!' 'lOPJ""'"''' po-",oq <II poou .....8OfI!l~n
'_S I!iJocIo pIlll8OllOr """"'lIC!l(OOl'l S!IlI D! MY "1<"""'0 JO - "'II <II A\lodOId
.'ll""" qnl;) ,('8 "100010 paw.....V ""!II'lIS 0IfJ. ....V ~JO - "'II 01 AI-.cI OIll"""qoo ^'111
'1.-0 pua_""l1lDl'ooo "1.-0 ljPON oot ....JD ut8!S lllpJD ""!1"""1 "'II'0lID!JIDI _I""l""ll' "'l.l
I
-3 ElV'8 83l1li-
I
I~ S!IN
on1:> Ava V10!O$O :.o~
JOIII01.....!1'>>!"looN._^AoIAJD,.p!!l:I 'In!
3.'d"l'lI01IlI~ :wOld
I
19SI-t~~ :N"'d
S_^ '!POI\I'g'J.'O
"""'" A.I.II'1
:OJ.
Y(d 0(: I :0IlI\J.
I JD I :Ilhd
oooz.tromDl( II
:"111()
I
'V'.ll.IIIIISNV'~J. 3'IWIB:JV'.=!
I
I
. NOl.lVDOdSNVU
.,..,.1N:lWNO_lANJ
o')NINNVld ONV'
.1IAI'
.~ -.-.s """*rs
I.IIIS... ...111
.'::-.. ..,,'.,............: '..,....
;,..... ,..,.-.-".",., ,....
_.o:;;;~;';i(:-':':-'" ~ n".,::.,:.' ,,;,~,,;.:...,. ......r.:.
.;(:k.;i.~,;~~~~~fi~i,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Send Confirmation Report
Name: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
ID: 7274468036
18 Jan 00 2:14PM Page 1
Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status
191 1118 2: 13PM 0'48" 4421561.......................... Send.............. 11 1 EC 96 Completed................................ .......
Total
0'48"
Pages Sent: 1
Pages Printed: 0
li_~II!'I!i'fi~!
~~;f.,:;llJlj
IlY"W "'-Ir'
~u
: d i!
; ~I
CD
Northsile
~~1ce,
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVIRONMENTAL -
TRANSPORTATION -
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Date:
18 January 2000
Page: 1 of 1
Time: 1 :30 PM
TO:
Larry Mikell
G.T.E. Media Ventures
Fax #: 442-1561
From: Kenneth H. Roush, P.E
RE: Right of Way Vacation "No Objection" Letter
Reference: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NES #9958
-MESSAGE-
The attached sketch indicates the location of the right of way. 300 North Osceola condominiums and Osceola
Bay Club own the property to the west of Osceola Ave. The Salvation Army and Osceola Bay Club own the
property to the east of Osceola Ave in this block between Jones and Georgia Streets.
Utilities may need to be relocated as part of this right of way vacation. Please provide a ''No Objection" letter
to this proposed request.
Thank you.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further questions or comments.
IF ANY PORTION OF THIS TRANSMITTAL HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY RECENED, PLEASE
NOTIFY TillS OFFICE IMMEDIA TEL Y AT (727) 443-2869
Copies To: File
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33765
N ESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
7)7 . 44~ . )R69 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
I
.
e
Send Confirmation Report
I
Name: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
ID: 7274468036
18 Jan 00 2:06PM Page
I
Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status
186 1/18 2:05PM 0'28" 4626636....... ...... ...... ....... Send .............. 1 / 1 EC144 Complet ed........................................
Total
0'28"
Pages Sent: 1
Pages Printed: 0
I
I
9W8'_-LUXV~ ,,,t'_'LU
WO'..,NllIdsaNlwtllH)W3N
WO":>NllIdsa NIWllINlwa"'SJN
"LU VOlllOU 'lIJ.1.VMH"'31:>
avoll1l3H)'13' Hl.nOS_
I
"I!d :OJ. SOldo:>
6118t-tI7V (LU) J. Y KIlIJ. YIOllNro!OllJdO SIH.L klUON
'dSVB1d '(]!lAlltY:IlI ^ 1'iU YOOOOV N!IBll J.ON SVH 'TV.LLIWSNv)u SlH.L 11.0 NOLlllGd ANY.dJ
I
."",...-0:>.10 nK1/IUfIb RIfI.II'!""""'I JItM ptIUII/' ntJlo 1/1II- OJ _""'1- lip "",au
I
'noA'I""'U.
'lIIftbN l'OIO'iOJd Sllll 01
_ ..uopoofqO ON" . "p!'Old """III. .IIO!..... ""11010 ,q8!J"!'ll JO ~ .. ~...q 01_ A1IUIIlO!IlI!lfi
-"-'Ii ~""'_r__q"!'ll"l"'Y"lOOOl()JO_O'IIOI~
.... ...... 'I'll:> AOlJ ",OlIOS() pIIIl AlILIV a_ "'IJ. ...y IIJOOOI()Ja _ 0'11 01 ~ 0lfl1lMO 'I'll;) Ala
.'....0 puIllWll~ "1'*"0 IpKlN OOt 'AllAJO IIl8JJ 0'11.1" UllJIOOOI Olfl "'1""""" ~ _ aq.l.
I
-3ElVSS3l111-
8S66I SlIN
!Ill1=> ^ VB Y'10!1;)S() '_"II
I
.DllO"l..lIC!l""fqo aN.. UOpellA ""tAl" ''lire
!l'd__'H'P"""X
:in!
'''''''d
9~9l>'#""d
~IIO_:>
o_aqoll UKl,L
'OJ.
I
I'(dO~'1 ''''''!J.
I JO I ''''11.
000t .......Ul
'''II(!
I
'V.ll.II^ISNVtlJ. 3'II^IISOV.:i
I
I
. NOUVJ.....o.dSNWJ.
. 'V~JWNO'aI'^NJ
.'I',UNNVld CJNVl
.1IAI:J
'~~~)Ig
I'..IS~~II
:.....::i~
,. ". ;,~~..." .~...".-': .:ij;i,.:....:.,,,,,",-\!i.;..
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
I
I Send Confirmation Report
II Name: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES ID: 7274468036
II
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
II
II
I
I
I
I
18 Jan 00 2:15PM Page 1
Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status
192 1/18 2: 14PM 0'38" 4626636.......................... Send........ ..... 1 / 1 EC144 Completed..................... ..................
Total
0'38"
Pages Sent: 1
Pages Printed: 0
~~;-.=;IW
~u
: Iii!
; ~I
CD
Northsile
~~~ce,
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVIRONMENTAL -
TRANSPORTATION -
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Date:
18 January 2000
Page: 1 of 1
Time: 1 :30 PM
TO:
Tom Robertson
Clearwater Gas System
Fax #: 462-6636
From: Kenneth H. Roush, P.E
RE: Right of Way Vacation "No Objection" Letter
Reference: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NES #9958
-M ES SAG E-
The attached sketch indicates the location of the right of way. 300 North Osceola condominiums and Osceola
Bay Club own the property to the west of Osceola Ave. The Salvation Army and Osceola Bay Club own the
property to the east of Osceola Ave in this block between Jones and Georgia Streets.
Utilities may need to be relocated as part of this right of way vacation. Please provide a ''No Objection" letter
to this proposed request.
Thank you.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further questions or comments.
IF ANY PORTION OF TIllS TRANSMITTAL HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY RECEIVED, PLEASE
NOTIFY THIS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY AT (727) 443-2869
Copies To: File
304 SOUTH BElCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 .443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
N 'i_'d"'F"II""-;~
11111.. Ii
~~-s-c.~.
':"'".'''"''-''~':_''''~:;';'''
CIVI ~ .
LAND PLANNING.
ENVIRONMENTAL.
TIV>NSPORTA"ON .
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Dale:
18 JlDuary 2000
Pap: I of I
'1_: 1:30 PM
ro:
Bob McCabe
Florida Powor CorporaIioct
FlId: Sli2-S7S3
From: KonIIeIh H.1IoUlIb. P.E
RE: RlsJrtofWlIYV_OIl "No Objoolioa"Lolltcr
R.......: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NIlS .9958
-MESSAGE-
Tho _eel lIkoldllnd",-lhe IoclIIioIl oftbo rialbt of way, 300 _ o.ceola coadomiaiuma lIIId Ooocolll
Bay Club OWlllbe property to tbo west ofOsc:oola A,V<. Tho 8ohation /umy.... Osceola Bay Club own l!Ie
propeR)' to l!Ie" of Osceola Ave in Ibis bIocI< _ Jooosllld Goaqia Slnm,
Utilili.. may .- to be ",1ocoIed .. pen oflbi. riJlht of WIly _an. PI.... prorido II "No ObjeoliOll" -
to Ibis JlfOPOIed reqooot,
Tlumk you.
1'1_d._hut_toCOlll1lCttIrUt1jfi".htwId""'_DJlyjurflrBt-........-,
IF ANY PORTION OF THIS TRANSMITTAL HAS NOT BBBN ADEQUATELY RI!CBIVBD, PLIlASE
NOTIFY TIDS OPPICE IMMEDIA TEL Y AT (727) 443-2869
Cap;.. Tn: File
304 SOUTH fELCH ER ROAD
CLEAAWATll. FLORIDA U76S
NESADMIN@N\INDSPRING.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 'l869 FAX 727 . _ . 8036
a :palUTJd saeed
~ : luas saeed
Telol
"Bela
,...."....,........,................... pa laTdwo::> vv~::>3 ~ n ..'..........'puas ....,........,............ 8gLgc9g "Bela Wd90:c B~n nn
snlelS apow saeed adAl or JO JaqwnN auoLld aeesn aWTl lJelS qor
I
II
I
aeed WdLO:c 00 uer B~
980B9vvLcL :01 S3::>I^~3S 8NIH33NI8N3 30ISH1HON :aweN
lJodaH uOTleWJT~uo::> puas I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Send Confirmation Report
Name: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
10: 7274468036
18 Jan 00 2:13PM Page 1
Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or 10 Type Pages Mode Status
190 1 /18 2: 12PM 0'38" 5625753.......................... Send.............. 1 / 1 EC144 Completed........................... . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
0'38"
Pages Sent: 1
Pages Printed: 0
------ ----
.........-.. --- .. --...-,. ..
iiiiiiu..
';;;=.=In
~u
Q i&~!
: III!
; ~I
OJ
Northsil1e
~.~1.e.
.
CIVILe
LAND PLANNING e
ENVI RONMENTAL e
TRANSPORTATION e
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Date:
18 January 2000
Page: 1 of 1
Time: 1:30 PM
TO:
Bob McCabe
Florida Power Corporation
Fax #: 562-5753
From: Kenneth H. Roush, P.E
RE: Right of Way Vacation "No Objection" Letter
Reference: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NES #9958
-MESSAGE-
The attached sketch indicates the location of the right of way. 300 North Osceola condominiums and Osceola
Bay Club own the property to the west of Osceola Ave. The Salvation Army and Osceola Bay Club own the
property to the east of Osceola Ave in this block between Jones and Georgia Streets.
Utilities may need to be relocated as part of this right of way vacation. Please provide a "No Objection" letter
to this proposed request.
Thank you.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further questioWi or comments.
IF ANY PORTION OF THIS TRANSMITTAL HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY RECEIVED, PLEASE
NOTIFY THIS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY AT (727) 443-2869
Copies To: File
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
72.7 . 443 . 2869 FAX 72.7 . 446 . 8036
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
I Bftlsldl"
SrI' ""1 ~ ,..
.:~":s':1<.
'-.<:':..~.
C.IVll_
LANO 'LANNING.
ENVIRONMENTAL.
TAANSPORTAT10N.
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Dole:
I S January 2000
Pago, 1 of 1
Time, 1;30 PM
I..V_.
G. T.E. T...... 0p0raIi0n.
From: "cnnlllh H. _. P.ll
Fad: 5&.1-9615
roo
RE; JUsbt ofW.,. V_ "No Objectica" Lettor
Referoac:c: OSCEOLABAYCLUB
NIlS mss
-MESSAGE-
The _ skelob indioat4a tho Iooatlon of1:he riIbI ofway. 300 North Oaoeola COlIdomini.... and 0s0e0Ia
Bay Club 0Wll tho property to tho __ of~ Ave. The SalvatioIl Am\y.... Oocaola Bay Club 0Wll tho
property 10 tho casl ofOaoeola A.. i111hil1_ _ J......dOeoqp. S.......
UtIIitleo III&Y ~ to be tel..-.. poll oftbi. ri8bI of way.-ion. Pl.... provide . "No Objection" 1el\1ll'
to thia ~ "'qu..t.
TbIIlk you.
PI_ do nol ,.,._,. _,,1m Djf/ct UrouJd}/DJI haN any /III1Irert[l108/ioJu or_r.s.
IF ANY POR'nON OF lIUS TRANSMIlT AL HAS NOT DE.EN ADEQUA TEL Y RBCIlIVIlD. PLEASE
NOTIFY THIS OI'FlCB JMMEDIATl!l.Y AT (727) 443-2869
Copies To; File
)04 SO\ITH BELCHER R()I.D
CLEARWATlR, FLORIDI' )]76.
NtSADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
NE.TlCH....' NOS'RING.COM
7).7 . 44) . >16' FAX '7).7 . _ . 80)6
o :palul~d sa6ed
~ : luas sa6ed
119€,0
TelOl
......... .... ............ ......... ...... palaTdwoo 96 03 ~ n ..............puas ... .............. ......... 9 ~96l99 119€.0 WdLO:l e~n ee ~
snlelS apow sa6ed adAl m ~o ~aqwnN auoLld a6esn aWll l~elS qor
I
II
I
a6ed Wd80:l 00 uer e~
9€089vvLlL :01 S30I^H3S ~N1H33N1~N3 301SH1HON :aweN
l~odaH uOllew~l~uoO puas I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Send Confirmation Report
Name: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
ID: 7274468036
18 Jan 00 2:11PM Page 1
Job Start Time Usage Phone Number or ID Type Pages Mode Status
189 1/18 2: 11 PM OJ 51" 5629615.......................... Send.............. 1 / 1 EC 96 Completed........................................
Total
OJ 51"
Pages Sent: 1
Pages Printed: 0
1------ --ill I ;.''''''.... ~!II
_._a_-,._ I!"II;~!:
i-p~.. ,';';I~ Ii
...... . I
~ ~;w...=.:1I ii I
~u
a II ~I
Z I"
III I
; ~I
CD
Norlhsille
E~~ 1ce.
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVIRONMENTAL -
TRANSPORTATION -
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Date:
18 January 2000
Page: 1 of 1
Time: 1 :30 PM
TO:
Joe Vacca
G.T.E. Telephone Operations
Fax #: 562-9615
From: Kenneth H. Roush, P.E
RE: Right of Way Vacation ''No Objection" Letter
Reference: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NES #9958
-MESSAGE-
The attached sketch indicates the location of the right of way. 300 North Osceola condominiums and Osceola
Bay Club own the property to the west of Osceola Ave. The Salvation Army and Osceola Bay Club own the
property to the east of Osceola Ave in this block between Jones and Georgia Streets.
Utilities may need to be relocated as part of this right of way vacation. Please provide a "No Objection" letter
to this proposed request.
Thank you.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further questions or comments.
IF ANY PORTION OF THIS TRANSMITTAL HAS NOT BEEN ADEQUA TEL Y RECEIVED, PLEASE
NOTIFY THIS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY AT (727) 443-2869
Copies To: File
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FlORIDA 33765
N ESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
7)7 . 44~ . )R69 ~AX 7)7 . 446 . 8036
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: June 20. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: Bl
Revised July 5, 2000 - see
underlined conditions (as
presented to and approved by
the CDB on June 20, 2000)
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
REPRESENTA TIVE:
Kenneth H. Roush
LOCATION:
400 Jones Street
REQUESTS:
· Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential IOOll Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 174 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dwelling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and permit a six-foot fence within the front setback
along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street,
and
· Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan and site survey submitted by Northside
Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 3.33 acres (including right-of-way proposed to be vacated)
3.24 acres (without right-of-way)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast corner
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
Page 1
.
.
East Portion of the Site: 150 feet by 155 feet i:
West Portion ofthe Site:522 feet by 320 feet i:
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate VICInIty IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
UPDATE:
This case was discussed at length by the Community Development Board at its May 16, 2000
meeting. The Board continued the case to enable the applicant to finalize the elevation plans and
landscape plan. The applicant has submitted revised plans including amended building elevations
(with a lower building height), revised landscape plan, and minor site plan changes with an
adjustment to the vacation of right-of-way request. The application also includes approval of a
six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Georgia Street and Jones Street.
The City has retained an architect (Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe) to review and assist in modifying
the design.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.33 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
Page 2
.
.
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
· Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
· Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
· Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
· Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification (instead of the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category ofCBD).
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
Based on the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current HDR zoning district, the site
characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff believes that the site is appropriate for
high-rise residential development. In determining the appropriate density for the site, the staff
was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future
density in the City should be located downtown where land and infrastructure are available.
Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical component of an economically healthy
full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central Business District is 70 units per acre in
Page 3
.
.
approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the remaining center section from Myrtle
Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units per acre. The transition from the
City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density proposed by the Osceola Bay
Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
areas will be the Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within two 14-story towers. Two levels of underground parking will be
provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated entrance/exit.
Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking garage.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, blue vertical
columns and flat arches. The east elevation of the towers incorporates a curved wall design.
Both the east and west elevations include extensive windows and balconies. The terracotta color
clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates
the use of cupola-type enclosures.
The site plan includes a drive-thru canopy near the entrance between the two buildings. It is
designed with the similar tile roof treatment to match the buildings. The design as proposed
incorporates a 100-foot space between the towers that helps preserve a view to the water. The
proposed amenities include tennis courts, pools, and spa.
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. The landscape plan has been revised and exceeds the requirements of
Code. This includes a mixture of various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals.
The Residential Infill Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
midpoint of the peak/eave of the main pitched roof. The HDR District permits up to 130 feet for
sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown District (to which the site will be
rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for
174 feet which includes 164 feet from the mean elevation to the top of the living units, plus ten
feet of mechanical area.
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre (150 dwelling units).
The applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
Page 4
.
.
of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating the portion of the road
just north of Georgia Street, in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. That portion will be conveyed to
the owners of the Belvedere Apartments. The southern third of the road between Jones and
Georgia Streets will be realigned and through movement will be maintained. A portion of the
subject property will be dedicated to the City as right-of-way for the realignment of the road.
Final lane alignments and widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor along Georgia Street shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to
meet current engineering standards.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING
PERMITTED
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units
units units (50 du/ac -
Peri he Plan
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
dwelling Yes
(45
150
units
du/ac
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
Page 5
.
.
B. FLEXmILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 145,055 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.33 acres
with right-of-
way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 174 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue - 3 feet
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 10
minimum feet; North
(Georgia Street
- 15 feet)
PARKING 1.25 space/unit 15 spaces 190 spaces Yes
SPACES (188 spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.665 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The Residential IOOll Project use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
c. FLEXmILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CBD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
project height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 174 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
Page 6
.
.
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Infill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
Page 7
.
.
The City retained an architect to review the proposed design changes that were introduced
at the May 16, 2000 CDB meeting. The City's consulting architect has worked with staff
and the applicant's architect to modifY the roof treatment and the east elevation design.
The proposal, as amended, is well articulated with unified elevations (especially east and
west) and coordinated architectural elements.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
Page 8
.
.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a 100-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The site plan and elevations have been amended to include a request for 174 feet in total height
for the two towers. The Planning Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet.
It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks will be required pursuant
to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not constitute approval of the
docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following seven conditions:
1) That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission and
relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised application to be
submitted);
2) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation to the top of the living units. and not to exceed 174 feet to the midpoint
of the peak roof enclosing the mechanical units;
3) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
Page 9
.
.
4) That the building permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the CDB;
5) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
6) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
7) That conditions 1-3 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Georgia Street. Final confirmation of the utility locations may
require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The
Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to resolve this issue prior to
review of the vacation request by the City Commission.
Prepared by: Lisa L. Fierce:
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
IIMS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola Condos\Osceola 400 STAFF
REPORT jinal.doc
Page 10
.
.
~l.rwater
u
TO:
Community Development Board members
FROM:
Ralph Stone, Planning Director
DATE:
June 14,2000
RE:
Osceola Bay Club Staff Report - Case FL 00-01-03
Attached is a revised copy of the staff report with a change in the suggested conditions of
approval. The condition (# 1) related to the right-of-way vacation of Osceola Avenue in
front of300 Osceola has been deleted in this new version of the staff report. It was
inadvertently carried forward from the last staff report.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused in your review of the report.
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola Condoslcdb memo re conditions. doc
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: June 20. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: B 1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Kenneth H. Roush
LOCATION:
400 Jones Street
REQUESTS:
. Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 174 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dwelling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and permit a six-foot fence within the front setback
along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street,
and
. Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan and site survey submitted by Northside
Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 3.33 acres (including right-of-way proposed to be vacated)
3.24 acres (without right-of-way)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast comer
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
East Portion of the Site: 150 feet by 155 feet i:
West Portion of the Site:522 feet by 320 feet i:
Page 1
.
.
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
UPDATE:
This case was discussed at length by the Community Development Board at its May 16, 2000
meeting. The Board continued the case to enable the applicant to finalize the elevation plans and
landscape plan. The applicant has submitted revised plans including amended building elevations
(with a lower building height), revised landscape plan, and minor site plan changes with an
adjustment to the vacation of right-of-way request. The application also includes approval of a
six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Georgia Street and Jones Street.
The City has retained an architect (Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe) to review and assist in modifying
the design.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.33 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Page 2
.
.
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
. Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
. Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
. Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
. Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification (instead of the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category ofCBD).
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
Based on the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current HDR zoning district, the site
characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff believes that the site is appropriate for
high-rise residential development. In determining the appropriate density for the site, the staff
was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future
density in the City should be located downtown where land and infrastructure are available.
Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical component of an economically healthy
full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central Business District is 70 units per acre in
approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the remaining center section from Myrtle
Page 3
.
e
Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units per acre. The transition from the
City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density proposed by the Osceola Bay
Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
areas will be the Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within two 14-story towers. Two levels of underground parking will be
provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated entrance/exit.
Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking garage.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, blue vertical
columns and flat arches. The east elevation of the towers incorporates a curved wall design.
Both the east and west elevations include extensive windows and balconies. The terracotta color
clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates
the use of cupola-type enclosures.
The site plan includes a drive-thru canopy near the entrance between the two buildings. It is
designed with the similar tile roof treatment to match the buildings. The design as proposed
incorporates a 100-foot space between the towers that helps preserve a view to the water. The
proposed amenities include tennis courts, pools, and spa.
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. The landscape plan has been revised and exceeds the requirements of
Code. This includes a mixture of various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals.
The Residential Infill Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
midpoint of the peak/eave of the main pitched roof. The HDR District permits up to 130 feet for
sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown District (to which the site will be
rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for
174 feet which includes 164 feet from the mean elevation to the top of the living units, plus ten
feet of mechanical area.
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre (150 dwelling units).
The applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating the portion of the road
Page 4
.
.
just north of Georgia Street, in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. That portion will be conveyed to
the owners of the Belvedere Apartments. The southern third of the road between Jones and
Georgia Streets will be realigned and through movement will be maintained. A portion of the
subject property will be dedicated to the City as right-of-way for the realignment of the road.
Final lane alignments and widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor along Georgia Street shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to
meet current engineering standards.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units 150 dwelling Yes
units units (50 du/ac - units (45
Peri he Plan du/ac
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
Page 5
.
.
B. FLEXmILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 145,055 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.33 acres
with right-of-
way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 174 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue - 3 feet
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 10
minimum feet; North
(Georgia Street
- 15 feet)
PARKING 1.25 space/unit 15 spaces 190 spaces Yes
SPACES (188 spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.665 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The Residential Infill Project use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
c. FLEXmILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CBD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
project height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 174 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
Page 6
.
.
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Infill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
Page 7
.
.
The City retained an architect to review the proposed design changes that were introduced
at the May 16, 2000 CDB meeting. The City's consulting architect has worked with staff
and the applicant's architect to modify the roof treatment and the east elevation design.
The proposal, as amended, is well articulated with unified elevations (especially east and
west) and coordinated architectural elements.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
Page 8
.
.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a 100-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The site plan and elevations have been amended to include a request for 174 feet in total height
for the two towers. The Planning Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet.
It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks will be required pursuant
to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not constitute approval of the
docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following seven conditions:
1) That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission and
relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised application to be
submitted);
2) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation;
3) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
Page 9
.
.
4) That the building permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the CDB;
5) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
6) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
7) That conditions 1-3 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Georgia Street. Final confirmation of the utility locations may
require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The
Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to resolve this issue prior to
review of the vacation reques~\ by the City Commission.
I .
r '../!/)(
Prepared by: Lisa L. Fierce: O\~J .. J
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
\'MS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIC D BlFLEXIPending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 STAFF
REPORT final. doc
Page 10
~
i
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: June 20. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: B 1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Kenneth H. Roush
LOCATION:
400 Jones Street
REQUESTS:
· Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 174 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dwelling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and permit a six-foot fence within the front setback
along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street,
and
· Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan and site survey submitted by Northside
Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 3.33 acres (including right-of-way proposed to be vacated)
3.24 acres (without right-of-way)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast comer
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
East Portion of the Site: 150 feet by 155 feet::t
West Portion of the Site:522 feet by 320 feet::t
Page 1
.
.
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
UPDATE:
This case was discussed at length by the Community Development Board at its May 16, 2000
meeting. The Board continued the case to enable the applicant to finalize the elevation plans and
landscape plan. The applicant has submitted revised plans including amended building elevations
(with a lower building height), revised landscape plan, and minor site plan changes with an
adjustment to the vacation of right-of-way request. The application also includes approval of a
six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Georgia Street and Jones Street.
The City has retained an architect (Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe) to review and assist in modifYing
the design.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.33 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Page 2
.
.
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
. Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
. Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
· Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
· Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification (instead of the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category ofCBD).
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
Based on the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current HDR zoning district, the site
characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff believes that the site is appropriate for
high-rise residential development. In determining the appropriate density for the site, the staff
was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future
density in the City should be located downtown where land and infrastructure are available.
Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical component of an economically healthy
full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central Business District is 70 units per acre in
approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the remaining center section from Myrtle
Page 3
e
.
Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units per acre. The transition from the
City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density proposed by the Osceola Bay
Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
areas will be the Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within two 14-story towers. Two levels of underground parking will be
provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated entrance/exit.
Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking garage.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, blue vertical
columns and flat arches. The east elevation of the towers incorporates a curved wall design.
Both the east and west elevations include extensive windows and balconies. The terracotta color
clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates
the use of cupola-type enclosures.
The site plan includes a drive-thru canopy near the entrance between the two buildings. It is
designed with the similar tile roof treatment to match the buildings. The design as proposed
incorporates a 100-foot space between the towers that helps preserve a view to the water. The
proposed amenities include tennis courts, pools, and spa.
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. The landscape plan has been revised and exceeds the requirements of
Code. This includes a mixture of various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals.
The Residential Infill Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
midpoint of the peak/eave of the main pitched roof. The HDR District permits up to 130 feet for
sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown District (to which the site will be
rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for
174 feet which includes 164 feet from the mean elevation to the top of the living units, plus ten
feet of mechanical area (representing the midpoint of the main pitched roof structure).
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre (150 dwelling units).
The applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating the portion of the road
Page 4
e
.
just north of Georgia Street, in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. That portion will be conveyed to
the owners of the Belvedere Apartments. The southern third of the road between Jones and
Georgia Streets will be realigned and through movement will be maintained. A portion of the
subject property will be dedicated to the City as right-of-way for the realignment of the road.
Final lane alignments and widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor along Georgia Street shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to
meet current engineering standards.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units 150 dwelling Yes
units units (50 du/ac - units (45
Peri he Plan du/ac
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
Page 5
e
.
B. FLEXffiILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 145,055 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.33 acres
with right-of-
way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 174 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue - 3 feet
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 10
minimum feet; North
(Georgia Street
- 15 feet)
PARKING 1.25 space/unit 15 spaces 190 spaces Yes
SPACES (188 spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.665 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The Residential Infill Project use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CBD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
project height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 174 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
Page 6
.
.
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation ofthe site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Infill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
Page 7
e
.
The City retained an architect to review the proposed design changes that were introduced
at the May 16, 2000 CDB meeting. The City's consulting architect has worked with staff
and the applicant's architect to modify the roof treatment and the east elevation design.
The proposal, as amended, is well articulated with unified elevations (especially east and
west) and coordinated architectural elements.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
Page 8
.
.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a 100-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The site plan and elevations have been amended to include a request for 174 feet in total height
for the two towers. The Planning Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet.
It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks will be required pursuant
to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not constitute approval of the
docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential 10011 Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following conditions:
1) That Osceola Avenue right-of-way be maintained north of Jones Street, adjacent to
300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere apartments);
2) That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission and
relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised application to be
submitted);
3) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation;
Page 9
l
.
.
4) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
5) That the building permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the CDB;
6) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
7) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
8) That conditions 1-4 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Georgia Street. Final confirmation of the utility locations may
require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The
Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to resolve this issue prior to
review of the vacation request b,y the City Commission.
. )"/'''i
'" .:.J...-
Prepared by: Lisa L. Fierce: (ft:J
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
IIMS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 STAFF
REPORTjinal.doc
Page 10
~
NDRTH
1"=300'
Aerial Map
Malcolm Craft; George Raddart, & Anothy Markoupdous
400 Jones Street
FLOO-OJ-03
&
~tI
CITY OF CLEARWATER, F1DRIDA
PUBUC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
1" -1320'
Location Map
Malcolm Craft; George Radd~ & Anothy Markoupdous
400 Jones Street
FLOO-OJ-03
~
NORTH
~
I 0
c=J~ NOKOMIS -.J
~ LEBEAU 11---'~
l- c==J IROOUOIS
~ PRINCESS t:: ~ '7-1
~c==J OSAGE ~~
PLEASANT g~ 1IJr.71
~8UQ CJ~ uz~
Vj 0 0 Jw ST ~
F~rrhII ~d~RMON7~;;;;J ~D ~D8~'"
u uru MINNE',o t5T~ i' ~~
f;M~AR/jSHALLfA ";~",,~,";!:c~;I:D
f-.. (;? ~ ~D~D D~D~c .~
l..; i{ 5!~!- <( 0 l- W <;1 is
----1J! "'" '!' :> CARLTON ~, - I'" RUSSELL
'" " :> [J [Jl'>. .::2:=cr.
/ V) ENGMAN" [~N[ d ~ TANGERINE ST 'J! ~
l1/J . ST ~ ENGMAN ~ IS <(
~Df3IDWrtl gD D 1- I~ 0
Q:" Jl: LA SALLE ST It: ~
PALM 8 ^ i2 "'n I I~ y
lj'" ll. J "^" "'C" "
":'AA D( i;s ~i~ []];~;Di
~oo
' MARGOD c=J []
07) ErE=]
~ SEMINOLE q
iao / #/1 I 0 c=J D~I -
"'f \j ELDRIDGE ST
nE' ~~[J[J~~ MSi2E c=:J CJ
~j '~r~ D'~~5 ~ l '" ,
]: ART ST 0 HART ST ~CK50N
[]'lllliJ D ~1i5 8 D,DD(}OI
O D (ROEW Dc< D~DSb~gb I~ 7~ UzD
tn ~ 55 <{ <(GROVE ~y Brown ~
~ ~ 5 HENDRICKS 0 LJ-LJ C=:J ~.. ",,,~'" 5
~ \Cf~iD b 0 CrD~D ~GROYE I O~D
~ 5.R. 60 CLEVELAND ST
[]~D8D c=J D~CJ L I D~D 0
~ t5 ~ ~ ~ PARK ST ..;t
~ gj <{Oar--! D~ II ~r----l 0 ~
(<' PIERCE ST I ~~ ~<l:L-J "
~D D~DOF~ 0 E:JE s~5T ~ljgD'Di ,17~(]~
COURT 51 C] \ ~I D DB; 0 3 ~ ~ ~;';:/1
~ Db R1 if Z w GOULD 5T ~J
~ MARK enD D DCOU Q~Sr ~ 6LJ c=J ~SANTA
O BROWNELL 51 -------,
'----------..J ~ ~J
o D~D ~CHES1NUTI D 0 CJ I COURT 5T l
D ~ i n D I TURNER I
PINE PINE 5T
5T
PALMETTO
:5
~
~
I
Q
/lllllIf",,,;...'"
,,'I-<sfAL.~--"'" CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
,'\)0M"i"<
~ "d/.... 8, '"
~;:,' - i'i~ PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
~~ ----. ~~
;. ~Iv. ~ /
---___;!-,~~,;;,,'" ENGINEERING
c=J
ROGERS
c:J~
"
. .
\ /1 / / I /
I ElDRIDGE STREET
':=-====== .TlJ II I ~ / \ / / I I -
I ---------- ~- ~I--
f--------- + ! I / I I !5J
_________ + / I I 7 J --
- - f-- -
f-------__ + / I { If - -
---- ~ 1\."'! / Il~ J r--- I--- ~ 1,)
I "" i"" 10."'''' \ \ 1 ':f
f--------- '---
"""--' r...;.~"" \\--- ~ -,
I ~ I-r~
c---------_ IJI
\~\ ..
~s ,--- \ )
~ ~.., ~~ L- '"
::>
~ ~
..'f'~ .z. t.",f' i <---
I
I f~- - ---- STREET ~~ I :1
GEORGIA
---~----- I
I u --
~ c-- I
c----------- ~ c-----'! : =-+-=
A - ~l'.itJJ I
~e -L
I -------- ---j-~ < I~~
cS f-----lI HART
I W!. ~ f-ij Z
f-----___ l!l
f-- ~
I :-,. z- -
f--------- ~
I! ~
-------- ..... ~~ I ~..,.g~ !Cf" .... I~ "
:\l -- ~ fC t---
..+5 c-- I fo.~ ,
;;; / ~
I S ,
~ -------- /
! /1 ~ ......., STR~r:-T
~O\e\ ~ t'.O\e\ ~~ --
0 . t~
~ z : iE
1~V" 111 fi 2l I. ~
~ ' . z I
~ 1/0(/ I I
DREW SlREET 5.R. 590
r--
~. 1-----
-'
~
'" I ==~
I ::>
z
~ -Ill
I I -~ z
<( l!l
i II ! u
I 1/ f -
; i -
II rl -
I III
0 I
I
d.
.5;
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
OWNER: Malcolm Croft. George Roddort, & Anothy Morkoupdous
CASE FLOO- 01- 03
ATLAS PAGE: 2778
SEC: 9
29S
IANGE: 15E
ADDRESS: 400 Jones Street
ZONING HDR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
\ 18 ~ ;; ~ 15 ~ /"" H 7 w ~ : l
v ~ '" '" "'., '" 700/ II; I; ~I; 700 :S" " j" ~ 700 8 ~
Jl() - '" '" to 10 I.r.< 40 70t <0 10
f-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ElDRtDGE L, STREET
J~ 1~1~12121' - ~I~;~ I ~-
~---------....~l tm1;I~~I~I;"'~IC; /611 12J13 610155 /, f5~24~ ~25~
___~_____ Z~"5ti78 9 6n '<) ~ '0610
f---------- ""-jf.-o.- 2 60./ 1.0. 11/14 60./ /60' 23 26(5)608
________ ~/' G . 3 L .80'-; L;f) J ff:)W.kof- 2F L 2-;;606
~ 1\./1 4-noOD605 9/ 16604/ j,05 21 28 604
..L .. ..-. 600"f 608 6 "f 20 1 4 6 29
LOT 4 ~ ~ 6 \ \ 7 18 ~ 1J.AR 3
_ _ \601 J 600 60' 7"W.~ ~ T
~bHARRINGTON512\ 518 8 _ ~T
9 ~ 50.1NIC SON 9
11 5-77 5'0 511 "
f--- _______ N 508' 609 1610 507 2 k'~ 8 510
HARBOR BLUrJ~o~ 5~B ~ 3 SLO .N' 50B
WATERFRONT S 50~ r ..(. 4 1 38 5 50z
6"'00_ CONDO -i. ~ 504
21- 31 "L 1 HARTS R 2ND
500 501 k Ir 1 00
1'=-=====- 0 8 GFnA~~O' 0 ~~~'::a:: ;;: / j/: 4
-'-"--'--- 1 ~ 406 6 ~. I ~ 354-'
~_______ ~ ~ "FT "t;\ 1~ 6 04 4087 v 2
.J g <'i,.1 ~ I ~5 ~ 2 402 ~~, I <0 '" e 10 0
Z 11 t'. "'. '4i 401 8 ~ ~ :75 ~
________ 11!! v 40 54014 3 400 ~l HART
t1!. 43/04 3' ~ 8'0 821~2~ ~ ~ ~
1--------- ~ 311 308 '9,p:~~\1~ RYio Il)
~ 43/06,- "" ~3/D Z- t;!~N 1 '.t_JU
C "'" 4'10' . 31744/029 8 P!-3
t') 309 ~u'_63p6:; 1(3) 5
~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~._- e.~
.Yo'1""'-'37' . "'10 f, 9 8@ 71
HAYDEN.., ~ _
.. 3~1! ~ ?
4 200 1ij 1 1Z12 3 5 Z ~ 1 21 3 '
g ~ 3 H6~ 3 53 20' ~ I 200 50 ; 206H 11 ~
SlREET I S.R. 590
r-
55 ~~ 8
12'^' '28_ "~9 6
1127 L -< 124
~31< 10 h- 5:~
118 ~
r:b) ~ \;
~~
~
1'056
60- 87
]t---
f---
GOV
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
<I
!!'
<C
~
~
o
::!:
a...
~
~
g
o
'2
--------
A LUTZ r
~
BELVEDERE APTS
J co- OP UNRE~OO 4
B ~
Iz~ '"
..,:i '"
o:,,-OJ
~
300
~2
01
C-
o In-l
" ~
---------
"'!s.-f--~
0' 2 3
1 > .
~ ~ ~ ~
4
:;;
~
~ ~ 221
M
21/01.1.11 "" - 0
?' '7/ / '- DIq-,,.,,
/ / ~026_L 1490-557 r 12/07 i2il
! 1415-238 I 9205 625
i~~~=~4 ·
l"'2-O1-~~
LS ~1 I
'"''''"' 1415- COACHMAN PARK I MAIN UBRA~~
",,,_ !(;mF'oRD & SMOYER m4--1~ r:j\ 961-
'* TOf" 2 \.!J 347
'Jij I' 1396-575 4119 1313 36
,.., ~ 448 -1864 d
Ii / I I! M
, 2
O,.,;1~
r5 ~2'"
:i.
43/07
200
:G
l
~
~
'"
~
~
J
I
j'
-u
':\
c:
"
,_tl~
5 111~.~
11lro-'~
12/06 ~
12/05
...
:>
~ 121
c(
12/04
12/03
~,,))
~O 4
~
o
<0
j
5 <::>36~
~~
~~
34
.611
~
6'fs
tllt
60 p.J
33
r--
32
r--
60,31
-
"IMAPLE
60'
518 19
l~
?
609cj :18 ~
~17 ...t-i'
... 607'" AI lA'
~O~~ ....
c(~3 j, :t5
601 ~14 6
, S::' 71,
405313 ~I
408 12 -g -
111~ 1~
o
~
o ~ g~ ~
8 ~ 80.
o 8 7
307 '(+)
6
2
, ~
2 ~
1 ~
d ~NES3&--
~ t.... e
~ ~ 0
8
6
7 -_
@, 22-3:-
y~.
7
60
I
133 1
2
~ 11/01
~ 115 4
Z~~)I
....Cf) U
c
f FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
.c
~ I CASE
~ OWNER.: Malcolm Croft, George Raddart, & Anothy Markoupdous FLOO- 01- 03
-u
B
0
~ I ZONING
~ ADDR.ESS: 400 Jones Street HRD
c
.ii
J ATLAS PAGE: 2778 I SEe: 9 I TWP: 29S I JlANGE: 15E
en
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
\ 18 ~ ;; ~ 15 \? 7" 'V ~'" / ~ ~ ~ ~ /
60-87 V ~ " " """ 700/ liC iC iCiC 700 ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ 70io 7012 g
e- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '" ELDRIDGE "7 STREET
~--~------Lg1 ~1~~I~I;~:~L1 !en 12J13 61O}55 ! ~S524~/~25~
-----____ 2"f3'14le!t3 ~w., /611 n,.., 610
r---------- L...jf--,.- 2 608/ 1e09 11/14 B08/ /609 23 I 26[3]BO.
__________ ~/' G . 3 L . 606 L~ I D"odWJeor- 2i' IL 2~eoe
I-- - _ _ _ __ _ _ ~ 1\ . 41"'\"04(>>'605 9/_16e047 J05 21 28 604
] ~ ~OVT JoQT2 f~.l"'" ~00.~03 8/17602/ J 201 - 4 629
GOVT LOT 4 -"'-i~ 6 7 18 7 1 .4R 3
1---------- 601'~ 600 601 19 J-ll T
~b>" HARRINGTON 512 \ 61~ ~ 509 1 NICH LS~N --
\ 11 5-77 510 511 9
~ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ N 508 509 7 510 507 2 &:: @ 8 610
\50~ 5 ~N3SLON7_
HARBOR BLUFFS 505 5::6 U ,~
WATERFRONT 3 4 ~3 4 1 38 5 502
CONDO % 504 HARTS m 2ND
21-31 500 2 1 501;;""'" l'f 1
40L-~ ~Q9 (~l ;a
GF"nRr:JA STREET -!;f 40. 3 ~ I. 4 404
B 40f 0 I/or 7 ~e ! 405 ,.." ~
~ 1 6 ::; I 3-47
r------___ ~ '->- II~]~ 240:4 4037 gi,1 5 10:~~
4018 ti'fO~~ t't
~ 11 c.. ~. :5 4 3 '" I ~ '" '" ;;
f--------__ ... 40 0401 400 3211-2 HART g
________ ~'" 43/04 31~1 910~]1:g ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
-- ;;(1;1311 308 18.~ ,.I.,1l~ ~ In 310 is .......
'ni~l t: ~ 3;€, 7 4~'" '--3;;; ~ B09
43/06 ~ ~ ~3/0i:i~ v 7 f,jipe i! 31744/029 8 7 6 C> 8 7
T p 16) 805 307 1(4)
---------
r------____
;..,.
r-----___
A
LUTZ ~
.76 ~ ~ 2
01
17? ~
'~~~
ali>:A
300
805 302
~-
301 2 3 4 300
1 " 5
~ .. ~ ~ "
~ ~ 1:l ~
'" ~
--------
BELVEDERE APTS
, CO-OP UNREC
. 3004
~
8 H1\?-11
I 0
o
~
II
10:;;,1 / ~Dfq-"9 2~:G _~
/ / ~?~~-~~l D8 1490--557 12/07 128
t: 1~1t_i~8. 12/08 9205-625
1842-214 L1C[l':~~~lICNl
L,S. 1161 I
1415- COACHMAN PARK I MAIN UBRA~~
,,,"'.. /'~RD Be SMOYER ~-10! '1' 961
~ 101 ~ 1396-575 (2) 1 ~'31/47 36
"1 ~ 4488 1864
i / I ! I
, I
<
~
g ~ 221
:::~t;~~~~~~ ;:;;
"\-'<t..,....."''<t'<t'<t..,...... ....
225
z
_Yo,- 17401-1374
HAYDEN
10 9 '"
.
, 2
5m1~
f5 ~2<O
!2Pr3
4
H6-
<0
~
200 ~ 1 1Z12
3 ~ 201 ..
~ ~
55 ..,
43/07
200
'"
~
STREET
'_'7~
5.... ,1\'l,....:!o<I
'8W-:~2
55
,---
1 35
~.
127 2 ~
f!i~
~~
~~
107
~
12/06 ~
12/05 12/01 12.
126
W
:> 12/04
~ 121 118
<
d
~
12/03
5 <:;)36~
~~
~
~~
34
33
I---- -
32
I--- _
e0131
!;fMAPLE
518 19
~
:;;
/
403 12
111~
, ~
2 :;
11 J t)N~S3~
i ~ ~ ~
60
133 1
tg~t.!
W
eOS8
~Rt
60j IV
601
~(.~
50'0;' 8 ~
.... 5ii' 17 I---
:> 16 L--
~: f '"
500 501 14 7~
405 13 o.
~I---
9
,LiE
10 /:t\ 5 124
122
120
';/ ~
~~ 2 0
a::
<
Cl
~O~4 ,
6
6
7 -_
@, 22-3:-
y
8@ 71 i 8
iL
3 4 f J.. 5 ~; \. 21
I """ ;20sn-l1
a I 50 I ~
3~
I
2
~3 11/01
11"f/ 4 J
5
~
....
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OWNER: Malcolm Croft, George Raddart, & Anothy Markoupdous I CASE FLOO-01-03
ADDRESS: 400 Jones Street I ZONING HRD
ATLAS PAGE: 2778 I SEC: 9 I TWP: 29S I RANGE: 15E
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
....<"<"
........,,,.
8
S.R. 590
7
9 6
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
&~Ci$)~
Cindy Goudeau, Clerk of il
FROM:
Ralph Stone, Planning Director
DATE:
May 4, 2000
RE:
New Advertisement for Osceola Bay Inc. - FL 00-01-03
As we discussed earlier today, I would appreciate your assistance in readvertising the
Osceola Bay Club project that is scheduled for review by the Community Development
Board on May 16, 2000. Please include the following language:
...are requesting aflexible development approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment
Project with 1) an increase in heightfrom 30 feet to 179 feet; 2) an increase in density
from 30 dwelling units per acre to 44.2 dwelling units per acre (total 150 units); and 3) a
partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue resulting in the realignment of
Osceola Avenue immediately north of Jones Street (Osceola Avenue to remain open to
northbound through traffic).
Thank you!
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIC D BIFlEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola Condos IRe-advertisement Memorandum. doc
fILE COpy
.
.
Memorandum of Clarification
To: Osceola Bay Club file - FL 00-01-03
From: Lisa L. Fierce, Development Review Manager
Date: May 4, 2000
Spoke with Brian Veilleux of North side Engineering to confirm the information within
the site data table as depicted on sheet C 1.1 of the April 18, 2000 submittal. The newest
information, as of today, is as follows:
· Acreage = 3.39 (includes existing site 3.24 acres plus a net increase of ROW of 0.15
acres); this equals 147,502 square feet in area;
. Units = 163; told him we were processing the original request for 150 units (based on
150 du and 3.39 acres, the density equals 44.2 du/ac);
· Impervious surface ratio = increased to 0.654;
. Open Space = increased to 51,042 square feet (34.6 %)
S:\Planning Department\C D BlC D BIFLEXlPending Applications\Osceola 400 Osceola CondoslMemorandum of Clarification. doc
FIL E COpy
.
.
F/0~
Osceola Bay Club
Public Works Staff Report
Enoineerino Analysis:
Sanitary Sewer:
Sewer service is available at the site. There is sufficient capacity at
the Marshal Street treatment plant.
Potable Water:
Water service is available at the site. The City system has
sufficient capacity.
Stormwater:
Stormwater treatment is provided per City code.
Traffic:
The original plan proposed vacation of the entire Osceola Avenue
right-of-way and closure of the one-way northbound street. City
staff conducted traffic counts over a one-week period showing an
average volume of 700 vehicles per day. Northbound Ft. Harrison
at Drew Street is operating at level of service "F" in the evening
peak hours. Staff determined that diversion of an additional 700
vehicles per day to Ft. Harrison was not recommended. The site
plan has now been revised to leave Osceola Avenue open as a one
lane northbound road. This revision is acceptable to City Staff.
Ingress/Egress:
Egress from the parking garage onto Georgia Street is preferable to
egress onto Osceola Avenue, as Georgia Street will have 20' of
pavement. Also, a sidewalk is to be provided on Georgia Street for
pedestrian access to Clearwater Harbor.
Summary/Recommendations:
Public Works recommends approval of the site plan subject to the following conditions:
1. Separate permit(s) are required for construction of docks or other structures in
Clearwater Harbor.
2. A revised right-of-way vacation application with updated letters of no objection from
all utilities is required.
3. A condition of the partial vacation of Osceola Avenue is that an ingress/egress
easement be provided to the property at 300 N. Osceola Avenue.
4. Existing utilities must be rerouted from underneath the proposed tennis courts to
within the new Osceola Avenue right-of-way.
5. Parking and access aisle dimensions must meet City standards, including clear
distance between columns in parking garage.
.
tflr-tJ1
.
~ {(Vt3/0D
City of Clearwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Lisa Fierce, Planning Manager
FROM: Michael D. Quillen, City Engineer
COPIES:
Mke Gust, Traffic Operations Engineer
Don Melone, Engineer I
Kelly O'Brien, Engineer I
DATE:
April 28, 2000
(Dtv e.,T'( ~/~
1JIAfI--- *jO~ Rf)/,eW
ApM I~I lj.-rtt- ^..r;
Ct- fvJ A. rrt\J ~
SUBJECT:
Osceola Bay Club
The following is a summary of Engineering comments for the subject development:
1. A separate dock permit will be required for construction of such structures within
Clearwater Bay
2. By code definition, Osceola Avenue functions as a collector street, thus an
appropriate right-of-way width of 80 ft. A continuation of the existing 40 ft. width is
acceptable, but not the reduction to 30-33 ft as proposed. This will allow installation
of sidewalks on both sides of the street and lessen the alignment curvature. The
appropriate right-of-way dedication will be needed.
3. A new vacation of right-of-way application will have to be submitted and letters of no
objection obtained from all affected utilities.
4. A letter of no objection will be needed from 300 N. Osceola Avenue for vacation of
the portion fronting their property.
5. An ingress/egress agreement with 300 N. Osceola Avenue will be needed.
6. The proposed utility easement across tennis courts is unacceptable. Existing and
proposed utilities should to be relocated/located within the proposed right-of-way at
the property owner's expense.
7. Easement or relocation of existing fire hydrant on Jones Street will be required.
8. Proposed apron for roll-out dumpster at SW comer of Georgia & Osceola will need
Solid Waste review/approval by Jim Maglio.
.J'. Hcp parking to meet City, State, and ADA standards
O. Parking and access aisle dimensions must meet City standards (clear distance
d~ between columns in the garage)
~.,.. 11. Clarification of owner responsibility for any private storm lines will be needed.
V 12. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected intersections
or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads. This includes
Ft. Harrison Avenue, as it is already operating at LOS F. Site impact does not
warrant any roadway segment widening or spot improvements for turn lanes, if the
security gate functions efficiently.
-
..
ee
,
ChristOPhJ.::Jilg E
500 N os~l~ ......
Clearwater. Florida 33755. USA
ForVFax(727)447-6034
i;: ~ LE::
i-I s~ - ~L"JC c~ ^C 7- at/poI ;6 L ~
e:^:f'{)t<'!c':;; /'s"Vf:"} C-'..-zl-r:sr lhtr-.?
/ S Q -2 1:1, ..z~ ,....~)J'/:r...s
7'l1J c: (;)I'r----'t ,-7-:1.' .
,r:'. -l {'r2c> c r f' l 'Ct I J I't' 'ft'.u }, / 'f'
IJ E'r/r fSJ (},1 /t) V ,
'fc., ('0 Y"~ s r 6',,-7-0 O/'l" -- l"V''J o~~ e (jQ
(.L.1, CJ.l C' tl rrl'FJ 600- 7ct.' C ev..r/dcr...:/..
Dear Mrs Fierce. ~ a ""-- S VI f' lJt E a J t" (, c, r~... r-t'1 7h e
because'lcan not attend the public hearinginper:6no;:d~ ~61~~p~al~~:/FI~rid~{ ~:~; 5': )/
Statute 286.0105, I write to you in great concern about this proposed Building. 'lr;y
So hete'is mynoti'ce of Objection.
As an interested party in thepublichearingregardingCDB 001-11/FlOO-01-03 lobjektto
the 3 requests by'Osceola Bay Deveiopmerit; . LtC ror the-followin~ reasons:
, .. . ',.,,' ';;;:;(JL~t[(';-0 C';c",_(\I~cr~'l("lsrvl--eS' ~6
1. Increaseinheightfrom30ftt0179ft /'e~/(;c-r7t."- /^- l~tJ<:!.j ,,"KS'f:!rtJr'cf:'>_ (~lf.
C:HJ.{J J <:'k.. c~ /'oorh '>'-- ~ I~fo.., ~J ,
a) the planned Building is to close"to our Building so it wilt obstruct the view especily of Acr ti-b.~-V1i
the Units facing east/south. They have only one window with a little view to the water. ~('l ~.r I 0
After the new Building is there like proposed there will be no view left at all and no -.5 iryJlD- h7
more sunlight. " @ Sf> "'tJ-.tJ)~
b) It also will take away the Sun from the Swimmmingpool, for anyone who can only go ( J;
there in the morning till noon there will be only shadow from the new Building. " ;111- 1
c) The exit of the garage of this planed Building will be in front of my window. So facing
this and thinking about cars of approximatly 130 Units drive in front of my window
every day with all the exhaust fumes and noise makes me si~k already. Not to speak }i ~' \
of my 4 little kids. I don't want to make them sick of pollution. +- G1"f'--- 5" i'-t, ~ 0 -f- i-:lo u to(\...
d) All this points affect in a big way the value of the Condo I own and not only reducing
it's value but maybe much more the quality oflivinghete.
Lisa Fierce ~
Planing and' Develdfment Service
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL. 33758-4748
Clearwater 12.04.00
Public hearing COB 00-11/FL.Do.01-03
-----..
2Jncrease in density
a) An increased density brings more people in this up to now quiet area. This is not
necesary and just increases the polution. trafic and noise (and maybe crime).
b) So the existing regulation (30 dwelling units per acre) had it's purpose and I think it
was just right that way and should stay like it this (same fore the heigh of 30ft).
.
..
..
,
..
Christopher Sperling
500 N Osceola Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33755, USA
FonIFax (727) 447-6034
Lisa Fierce ;;>
Planing and Develdfment Service
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL. 33758-4748
I"",",;":':' .:'" ',":~:::)J
:~ , _. U: () : ,,~. c." ","..
,';~. '7' t,;. t" , I' ":J'~.1<a.
.' -'-"'.' ';',. :,:. t-i-
1\ t~ ';, "
, ""~"" ',(b."....~.
., ... ~~~~
Clearwater 12.04.00
Public hearing COB 00-11/FL~O"()1-03
------..
Dear Mrs Fierce,
because 'I can not attend the public hearing in person 'and so can't appeal per Florida
Statute 286.0105, I write to you in great concern about this proposed Building.
So hete'is my notice of Objection.
As an interested party in the public hearinQregarding .CDB 001-11/FlOo-01-03 I objektto
the 3 requests by Osceola Bay. Development, lLC: for the'f()nowin~ reasons: .,
1. Increase in height from 30ft to 179ft
a) the planned Building is to close to our Building so it will obstruct the view especily of
the Units facing east/south. They have only one window with a little view to the water.
After the new Building is there like proposed there will be no view left at all and no
more sunlight. '
b) It also will take away the Sun from the Swimmmingpool, for anyone who can only go
there in the morning till noon there will be only shadow from the new Building.
c) The exit of the garage of this planed Building will be in front of my window. So facing
this and thinking about cars of approximatly 130 Units drive in front of my window
every day with all the exhaust fumes and noise makes me sick already. Not to speak
of my4little kids. I don't want to make them sick of pollution.
d) All this points affect in a big way the value of the Condo I own and not only reducing
it's value but maybe much more the quality of living here.
2.lncrease in density
a) An increased density brings more people in this up to now quiet area. This is not
necesary and just increases the polution, trafic and noise (and maybe crime).
b) So the existing regulation (30 dwelling units per acre) had it's purpose and I think it
was just right that way and should stay like it this (same fore the heigh of 30ft).
.
.
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Richter, Debbie
Wednesday, May 03,20002:30 PM
Fierce, Lisa
RE: fees for osceola bay club
There has not been an official calculation done on this project since some of the information needed has not been
provided. The $62,655.20 OSR fee was based on a value per square foot that Richard Trela threw out just so we
could show him how to use the form to calculate. We still need the following in order to do a calculation:
. Net land area (same as gross less natural preservation area)
. Verification of just value for land only from the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office
. Verification of existing structures (# of units if residential, square footage if non-residential)
This project will owe all 3 impact fees, Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facilities. I have not heard
from anyone since 2/1/00 when Mr. Trela met with me.
@Deb (562-4817)
-----Original Message----
From: Fierce, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 11 :54 AM
To: Richter, Debbie
Subject: fees for osceola bay club
hi debbie,
the last estimate for open space/rec fees was $62,000. is this still accurate? (no changes to the project in terms of # of
units, etc.)
could you let me know by tomorrow am?
thanks
f\l E COPl
1
TO:
FAX:
-40 €~
\,\11 '?~
@
.
u
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER" FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727)562-4576
FROM:
DATE:
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
w
j
03/20/00 MON 13:51 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERC IAL
~002
.
.
MLG COMMERCIAL
BrOl(erage
Management
Investment
Development
Consulting
New Am"';ClIlntemstlonsl
March 20. 2000
13400 Bishop's Lane
Suite 100
Brookfield, WI 53005
Office: (262) 797-9400
Fax; (2621 797-8940
http://www.mlgcommercial.com
Via Facsimile
Offices in Appleton, Wisconsin
and Huntsville, Alabama
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Re~ CDB OO-ll/FL 00-01-03; Request by Osceola Bay Development, LLC
for a Flexible Development Approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment
Dear Ms. Fierce:
I am writing this letter on behalf of Michael S. and C. Margene Zimmer regarding the
above referenced request. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer own a condominium unit in the
Belvedere Condominium development, which is located in the 300 block of North
Osceola Avenue. Mr. and Mrs, Zimmer wish to register their strong opposition to the
three components of Osceola Bay Development's request
First, an increase in height from 30 feet to 179 feet is totally llllreasonable. Such a
dramatic height increase would block the view of many of the units in the Belvedere
development as well as the view for many others. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer, and I am sure
many others, purchased their property with the reasonable expectation that an established
part of the city would not experience future dramatic change; particularly a six-fold
increase in neighboring height restrictions. This change would only benefit the
requesting party at the great detriment of other owners and residents such as Mr. and Mrs.
Zimmer.
Second, the requested change in density is also unreasonable. Increasing density by one-
third guarantees increased congestion and traffic problems, again at the expense of
current residents and owners, This area of the City is already too congested, and to add to
that congestion by increasing the permitted density is contrary to sound public policy.
Also, it appears the increase in density would be at least partially the result of increasing
the height limit, which as I pointed out above is not fair to current residents.
COMMEI~CI.^L REAL ES1:A'rf. SERVICES WORLDWI.D.E.
INDIVIDUAL MEMBER OF
._-~ ~
(3/20/00 MON 13:52 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
14I 003
.
.
Finally, the Zimmers are also strongly opposed to vacating Osceola Avenue between
Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola is an important corridor through the City. To
simply eliminate a section of it under any circumstaJlces would be poor planning, but to
do so when a developer is proposing to significantly increase congestion and density in
an already overcrowded area is outrageous
Moreover, Osceola Bay Development would seem to have n<) more right to use that
vacated street than other adjacent property owners, such as the Zimmers and other
residents of the Belvedere Development. Hence, if the street is vacated, which I believe
would be a terrible decision, then Osceola Bay Development should not gain exclusive
ownership of the vacated roadway - Belvedere Development could put to productive use
part of the vacated street.
fn summary, the requested changes would benefit only the developer to the great
detriment of the owners of nearby properties. For the foregoing reasons, the Zimmers
respectfully request that Osceola Bay Development's request be denied.
Thank you.
Z{fl~'
Paul J. Hinkfuss
Assistant General COWlsel
cc: Ann De Poole, Manager
Belvedere Homeowners Association
300 North Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33755
Members of the Community Development Board
I \oa\sysldatalinvestsllesal\pjh \~lmm<:rl et. doc
.
.
Horst and Karin Tubbesing
-..,
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Director
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater FL 33758 -47(
re: Notice of Public hearing CDB 00-11/FL 00-01-03
10. April 2000
Notice of Objection
As an interested party in the public hearing regarding CDB 00 1-11/FL 00-01-03
we object to all 3 requests by Osceola Bay Development, LLC for the following reasons:
I.Increase in hight from 30ft to 179 ft
1. the planned 15 storey highrise is too close to the water and will
obstruct the view of all South Appartements in Osceola 500 plus take a lot oflight
and sun away from those appartements.
2. It will also cause that our swimming pool facing west will be in the shade in the most
mornings ofthe year (to 1 pm).
3. 'The planned exit to their parking garage will also be directly in front of the
appartements facing South in 500 No Osceola (as well as their trash storage). With 130
planned units this will be a lot of additional traffic, additional exhaust fumes and additional
noise (see also Sa).
4. Points 1 to 3 directly affect all South facing units in the 500 building, thus reducing
their value and the quality of living considerably.
2.Increase in density
see next point
fL CD ~O{ --03
flu;
.
.
3.Vacation of North Osceola Ave right-of-way from Jones St. to Georgia St.
1. The proposed shutting off of Osceola between Jones and Georgia leaves Georgia as the
only access to 500 North Osceola, this is unacceptable because:
a) 130 units in the new developement plus 100 units in 500 Osecola exit through
Georgia onto N Fort Harrison. They need to turn either right or left there, IF there
is a gap in the busy traffic going North and South on Fort Harrison - this could cause
build ups in Georgia (which is very short) and even build ups in the planned
underground garage as well as the car park of N. Osecola 500, which means
'even more noise and more pollution for all South facing appartements of the 500
building.
b) additionally to the above we have Georgia as the only Entrance point ( access) to the
500 Building plus all buildings and houses further north on N. Osceola. Which means
heavy traffic going both ways through a Georgia "Bottleneck".
c) Trying to access the 500 Building (and houses further north), the owners of 500 N
Osceola (and other people wanting access to North Osceola) have to turn left into
Georgia. This is the ONLY access then to 500 N. Osceola. It can only be done IF there
is a gap in the traffic coming from the North.
As Fort Harrison is extremely busy, specially at peak times and on weekends, with
people going to the beaches, the cars wanting to turn left into Georgia will build up and
this will become a very dangerous spot - with accidents likely to occur.
At the same time people wanting to turn LEFT ONTO Ft. Harrison, coming out of
Georgia, have to wait for the same gap in traffic!!
'\ . "
~/ /a/~.~
Horst Tubbesing V
{;{ - p . ' ~ -r l-Llob.c:.-' I\. \
Karin rlach- Tubbesing .. 0
.TY OF CLEARWATER.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPM~T
MUNINCIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER,FL 33758-4748
PHONE(727)562-4567 FAX(727)562-4576
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO. 1./
. !,//:/)
\,", "t \.
t26~t S t'l
FROM: L c.){'[
...--.
ire:) C'C-,
COMP ANY: ,\iClIfJ1S ~ ct/lj/"
DATE:
'J.../!~'I /f") -.
Rc;I (.... ~ V v
FAX NUMBER:
Lf4& .- ~D ~C.7
PHONE NUMBER:
NOTES/COMMENTS:
(2~e: ()j t~ D ~f_ f)~ C'( u-- 0
('/{( {~~ .)/~'LC (,.~! }2 U;ilh~ IUc ---
-j:: ct~-t Iv-.-<.. t, +~'-'ffr -6'v N;" )
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES
INCLUDING COVER:
'I
~)
o Per your request 0 For review 0 Please comment 0 Please Recycle 0 Urgent
ONE CITY.ONE FUTURE.
03/20/00 MON 13:51 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
~002
.
.
Brokerage
Management
Investment
Development
Consulting
MLG COMMERCIAL
New Amer;c.'ntemstlon.'
March 20. 2000
13400 Bishop's Lane
Suite 100
Brookfield, WI 53005
Office; (262) 797.9400
Fax; (262) 797-8940
http;ftwww.mlgcomrnercial.com
Via Facsimile
Offices in Appleton, Wisconsin
and Huntsville, Alabama
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Plaruling and Development Services
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Re~ CDB 00-ll1FL 00-01-03; Request by Osceola Bay Development, LLC
for a Flexible Development Approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment
Dear Ms. Fierce:
I am writing this lener on behalf of Michael S. and C. Margene Zimmer regarding the
above referenced request. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer own a condominium unit in the
Belvedere Condominium development, which is located in the 300 block ofNort11
Osceola Avenue. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer wish to register their strong opposition to the
three components of Osceola Bay Development's request
First, an increase in height from 30 feet to 179 feet is totally unreasonable. Such a
dramatic height increase would block the view of many of the units in the Belvedere
development as well as the view for many others. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer, and I am sure
many others, purchased their property with the reasonable expectation that an established
part of the city would not experience future dramatic change, particularly a six-fold
increase in neighboring height restrictions. This change would only benefit the
requesting party at the great detriment of other owners and residents such as Mr. and Mrs.
Zimmer.
Second, the requested change in density is also unreasonable. Increasing density by one-
third guarantees increased congestion and traffic problems, again at the expense of
current residents and owners. This area of the City is already too congested, and to add to
that congestion by increasing the permitted density is contrary to sound public policy.
Also, it appears the increase in density would be at least partially the result of increasing
the height limit, which as I pointed out above is not fair to current residents.
COMMERCl1\L REAL ES1'A'J'r: SERVICES WORLDWIDE.
INDIVIDUAL MEMBER OF
.~..~
~
f
~
C3/20/00 MON 13:52 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
141 003
.
.
Finally, the Zimmers are also strongly opposed to vacating Osceola Avenue between
Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola is an important conidor through the City. To
simply eliminate a section of it under any circwnstances would be poor planning, but to
do so when a developer is proposing to significantly increase congestion and density in
an already overcrowded area is outrageous
Moreover, Osceola Bay Development would seem to have no more right to use that
vacated street than other adjacent property owners, such as the Zimmers and other
residents of the Belvedere Development. Hence, if the street is vacated, which I believe
would be a terrible decision, then Osceola Bay Development should not gain exclusive
ownership of the vacated roadway. Belvedere Development could put to prOductive use
part of the vacated street.
In Sl.lmmary, the requested changes would benefit only the developer to the great
detriment of the owners of nearby properties. For the foregoing reasons, the Zimmers
respectfully request that Osceola Bay Development's request be denied.
Thank. you.
~~'
Paul J. Hinkfuss
Assistant General Counsel
cc: Ann De Poole, Manager
Belvedere Homeowners Association
300 North Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33755
Members of the Community Development Board
\ \oa \sys\data\jnvesls\legal\pjh~i mmcrl ct, doc
2
0
:0
-4 ~
:r
~ )>"0
m :0)>
CJ) ~~
-l
0
Z
., ., ., ., "U ., ., ., ., m
C)-4 C>:O C>_ C>:O :0 C)-l C>:O C>- C>:O ~
-Co "Um "U2 "'Om 0 -Co "'Om "'02 "Um CJ)
0...; 0-4 00 OCJ) "U 0-4 0-4 00 OCJ) ::!
)> ;r.. C 0 )> )> C 2
0 CJ) ." 0,
r- , en m r- , en m C) -4
-4 m -4 :OtJ)
, , :0 2 0 , , :0 2 ~m
);, ::! ... ); -4
W N )> .... ); oo4:E
... .;:.. , "'" CD , I
, 0 r- 3:)>
CD ~ , "'" ,
w ~ , Co CD , mC)
.... (J1 N 0) CD "'" "'" 2m
U1 ~ 0) .;:.. 004
0 .;:.. 0)
0 .;:.. .;:.. "'"
...... .;:..
eN ~ ~ N
0> 0>
0>
., ., ., ., "U ., ., ., ., m
0)004 W:o W_ N:o :0 Woo4 N:o N_ <Xl:o X
Wo !"m W2 O>m 0 Wo ~~ N2 !'Jm CJ)
?oo4 Noo4 .~ 0 !1>CJ) "'0 ,:--1004 ."'" 0 ......CJ) ::!
W)> w)> "",C W- 0 W)> ......)> NC 0- 2 004
wr- .;:..- wCJ) 0>0 CJ) ~r- 0- OCJ) ~O C> :0
0 , w-4 wm m , 0-4 m ~:E
. c>, :0 C>~ 0 , c>, C>:!:! C>2
C) "'0 C>- G') "U "U-4 004)>
-C 0 "U)> "U- " 0 "'0)> 0- 3:;1
0 O~ 0)> 0 0' )>
, , r- m:o
, , 2
004
., ., ., ., "'0 ., ., ., ., m
004 :0 ~:o :0 -4 :0 Z !'J:o X
0 m 2 ....m 0 0 m (J1m en
004 -l Cl )>!:!? "U 004 -4 0 )>!:!? ::!
)> c 0 ~ C :0
)> CJ) ('")0 en )> CJ) ('")0 Z ~m
,.. r- -l :om m ,.. ,.. -l :om C>
, , :0 m2 0 . , :0 m2 n~
CO 2 ); CJ)-4 N 2 ); CJ)-l E~
:... -- 2); U1 -- 2);
)> , )> r- :joo4
)> , mr- )> , m, m-
m , m , tJ)0
(") 2 0 n 2 0
:0 -- m :;Q )> m Z
m )> 0 m 0
tJ) tJ)
., ., ., ., " ., ., ., ., I~
)>-4 )>:0 )>- )>:0 :::0 )>-t )>:0 )>- )>:0
00 Om 02 Om 0 00 ~~ 02 Om -t
-t-l -I-t -40 -4CJ) "U 004-4 -40 -I en :0
)> )> C 0 )> )> c I~ )>
en 0 CJ) CJ) 0 Z
,.. r- -l m m ,.. r- -l m tJ)
, , :0 2 0 , , :0 2 "
W N ); -4 N ); -4 0
N ); -. ); :0
0 r- .;:.. 00 ,
to "'" , r- Co , , ~
<Xl , "'" ,
.... CO 0 -l
U1 0 eN .;:.. to 0> .;:.. .... S
.... 0>
"'" CD N U1 Z
W 0> .;:.. (J1
N CD
')
on
c:
~
::J:
., m
:0
)>
Z
)>
,..
-<
tJ)
(ii
Z
o
:0
-t
::J:
:E
m
tJ)
:-t
tJ)
o
c:
-I
~')
en
-l
)>
Z
o
tJ)
o
c:
i!
:E
m
(I)
-l
~
"
)>
Z
tJ)
S
z
)>
:0
~
tJ)
'J
....
-..I
en en
0 0
.:: c
-i -i ~
::I: ::I: -
m :E >"0
}> m :2:1>
en U> ~~
-i -i
0
2
., ., ., ., m ., ., ., ., " ., ., ., m
I ~ ..10-4 .... ... -..1:0 :0 N:o ~
-4 0 :0 CO2 -..12 ...0 0 -4 0
0 "Tl m "'u> U> 00 mO . "Tl ~m " 0 "Tl ~m U>
-i :!! -i :j ~-4 ~"Tl OU> ~ :!! CO-i :j
l- (") ~ N-i z Ol- coC 0- 01- 0 (") Nl- z
c>=i 01 en ~(") NO U> 01 - -i
r- m r- c> ~.... m m m r- m r- c>
I , I "C I c>-i c> , c>Z 0 I , c> I :I:I(/)
N N N O:j C) ,,:!:! " "-i N N " ~m
CO " 01 0 "0 Ol- 0 O- W 0 -4~
W Z 0 r- }> en -..I s:>
OJ W I r- ...
CO -..I OJ }> I ~ 01 mC)
U1 en r- 0 2m
C) c> c> C) c> -4
" iJ
"0 0 " "0 0
0 0 0
., ., ., ., m ., ., ., ., " ., ., ., m
W-i W:o , ~ ..10-4 -..1_ ... OJ:o :0 W-4 N:o ~
:-'0 0 ~~ "'Z U> -..10 OOZ 010 ~m 0 :-'0 0 ~~ U>
"Tl :"U> ~O . "Tl " ."
CO-4 :!! ::! !"-4 N"Tl -..IU> 0)-4 :!! -l
N> w)> o-i ~> ...C ~- 00- 0 0> -..I}> 2 -4
COr- n co- o=i I~ ~r- oen enn ~O en U'Ir- n 01- :2:l
m r c>C 0 c>-l m m m m r- c> ~~
C), , c> I I c> I c>z 0 C). I c> I
." N " ,,:j C) ,,:!:! " "-4 "0 w " -4>
0 0 00 "0 ol- 0 0- 0 0 3:-4
-..I Z C r l- 0>
co I r- w mm
0 l- I 0 z:2:1
r- -4
c> c>
" "
0 0
., ., ., ., m ., ., ., ., " ., ., ., m
I ?:5 !'.l:o :0 ~
-4 0 :0 zz -I Z 0 0 -I 0 :0
0 ." m -U> U> 0 0 ." ~m " 0 "Tl m en
~ :!! -i }>-i :j -I C :!! }>~ 0 -I :!! -i :j
n }> =i z l- en n no en )> n l- Z .,,:0
r- m r- C> r- -4 m :om m r- m r- C) )>~
I , , C I :0 I mZ 0 I I I 0:1:1
2 Z z ::! N :; Z u>-I Z Z z E~
)> - - 0 ~ ~ z:; - - -
}> }> Z r- )> }> }> ::1:1
}> )> I mr-
m I mO
r- 0 Z 0 (/)z
- m
l- 0
., ., ., ., m ., ., y .,. " ., ., ., m
N-I ~o N:o I ~ ~-I .... !"O ... :0 ~-4~oCC;:o X
....z . Z :0 0 en -I
~O w"Tl ~m U> "'0 go 01"Tl O1m . ON"" !!l
U'l-4 ." CO-i ~U> ::! N-4 N." OU> " W-4 .,,-..1 -i ~
co)> }>- OJ}> O'l-t Z 0>)> wC 00- U'l- 0 -...I)>}>C=;-..I}> Z
0(") }>=i (") )>~ U> Z
~r- 01 - c> )>r- )>U> )>m Nr-OmO;= c>
-i~ r m (/)
)> , )> I OC 0' 0-1 0 I OZ 0 I -i I )> , "0
C 0 -i:j -4 -l~ -i -l::! 0 0
-I -i 0 )> }> -i :2:1
Z r- r- ~
}> I
I
r- -4
0
Z
I
I
I
I
l
!
i
!
I
'.
,
./
'>
J
.
.
(!) .'z>- (!)" "en t.'J .. .. en
ZOoco ZOZW ZOZUJ
-(!)-O -(!)O~ -(!)O~
Z t;;~~w I-~i=- 1-2i=-
en ...J en ...J
0 -01-1- -O<t- -O<t--
X . I- U X . I- U
j:: X 'a:<t wooa:<t LiJooa:<t
('.. ~ wo;>O(!) >-OOu.. >-OOu..
...J >-~ll.~ ct:l~e;z co~ll.z
a: <t l- I- co,.... en-
Ol-z:2 en
0 -l- I- a 0 Ol-zQ Ol-zQ
0.. 0 ~O , a , <t , <t w<t<X:en w<X:<X:1- w <X: <{I-
(/) w w<( =<( w,.... ...Jcn I- a:w ~(!)l=~ I-(!)a:<(
Z en 9.... <t.... ~.... <t... <((!)I-~ <(zl-W
<t 0 o~Z::i o~zo: o_zO:
a: a.. enN 1-00 u..N 1-0 01-0- ol-au 01- U
w,.... wo u.. ' o ' ~<(ow
I- 0 0: ' 0: ' o~ I-Ln ~<tl-u 2<(1-~
a: N ,.... N ~o:u<( ~a:I-a:
ll. A A A A W u.. 20:U OW~u...
oo..<(z o~<(u.. 0.......0
UOo..o UOll.O UOll.
U ~- U(J)~" U(J)~'
<(en-I- <(--(J) <(--(J)
0 -O<t woO::> wo@:;)
wOWW
Z(/) W coz(J)a: COZW...J cozen~
a () (J)ll.
.Qw I W <t z<(<tu z<(<ta: z<t<(a:
I-j:: ...JW <( <X: <(O~~ <(ow::> <(ow::>
~;;;;! <(z - - ~ U(!)UZ u(!)O:en U(!)a:(J)
~(J) Z Z v ~ u" ~ u.
~~~o en W en W
a:() Cl Zw WoOl? woOl?
U< UJ UJa: ...J UJ ..J u~~1- U ." Z U . .. Z
Wu. en OU <( U <t -oOU -o~- -o~-
a: 0 u;<( u: I- ii:....(!)<t . >....01- >....01-
I- a: (!)(J) ffiu..(!)~
ll. Wv W u.. 0 wu.. 2 Q..W wu..:2-
0 0: . 0: 0 I- enoo~9 eno x enO~x
0: v a:>-m.:...::3: OW OW
a.. A ... A A a: ~ . ffi~m '
Wl-~' >- W <D'
~[jl-~!:: 3:-....~ 3:-~~
u 0: U a:
UJ<(<(, U w<(l-<( w<(l-<(
enll.(!)en(J) (J)ll.<tll. enll.<(ll.
O<(zOUJ o<t(!)z o<(l?z
I- zU~...J~ zu~<( zu~<(
a:~ <((J)<(I-::i <((J)I-co <(enl-co
...Jo 0 <( z- a:<(<!o: o:<(<!o:
w:!: 0 ffiJ:ffiwu wJ:O:::> wJ:ffi::> 00
~I- ::;ll. a ll. a.. 1-1-0..0:<! I-I-~o
I-(!) ll. (!) C) <(zoa:u.. 1-1-0..0
;:~ a Zv '(!) , '00 <!zow <!ZOw
w Woo =0 Wv ...Jc.o ~::i~~~ ~<!(J)en 3:<((J)(J)
a: en u<D
I- 90 <(N <tLn z..J-o ..J-o
0 -v Zll.Owi= Zll.Oll.
cn . 1-0 u.. . I- . o..Oll.
ll. UJ<D UJ . u..oo ood" ol-z::><! ol-ZO Ol-ZO
0 a:V a:~ o~ I-c.o enz<(ZUJ (J)Z<!a: enZ<(a:
a: .... C'Il I-WOUJO: I-UJoll. I-woll.
ll. A A A A ~2(!)~~ ~~t.'J>- u~(!)>-
<(1-2CO
ll.~2zO: ll.<(2CO ll.<(
2W~0u.. 2WN 2w~0
-0:0'l(J)0 - 0: . a -O:O'lUJ
0 ...JI-....o:" ...JI-~~ ...J 1-.... I-
0 a.. <(wu..a:en ::!;UJu..<t <(UJu..<t
ll. (!)
I- (!) ~(!)0<t3 I-(!)O(!) ~(!)O(!)
wZ It) C") ~~~~~ z<!>-~ z<(>-~
C)UJ <(3:1-- <(~I--
<t:!: ...Jo O'l ~ I-w[jG:::> I-w-2 I-w-2
'<:t . 0
;:.... ::;ll. (J)(J)<( en en(J)u (J)en~en
,.... 00 0.. co . <( (J)
w~ I-(!) C) co '0..J:< co .
0 ~.... ~,.... ::>I-<(I-(!) ::>1-ll.W ::>I-ll.!:,!
(/)a: w ...J W fh enenuO:z enen<(~ (J) en <t I-
.... en a.... <t u ctM - '...J 0- '...Ju::i ,...Ju::i
0 _CD u: I-Ll'!. fh <t...J(J)zl- ~...Jen- <t....Jen[j
(J) . I- <t<(u
ll. wC") LU u.. ON > w <t <(,.,.. ~ w<(<t<!
0 a:C") 0:: 0 ....C'Il a:J:J:C5X a:J:J:<t a:J:J:u..
0:: .... C'Il ...I <(en.... UJ <(cn....u.. <(en....
ll. A A A A <( zO::ZO. zO::zz O::zz
z o<t::iUJ~ O<{<(O Z<t<(o
_~ 1-0:: -2..J~ O~...J-
<( (/)-ll.<(<( (/)-ll. --ll.....
z~....Oll. z~....<! ~~I-~
LL <t ZOz <t ZW
Z o..-wO: <t_Zo::
0 o..[jW:E<( o..uWu
0 ~<(:22co ><u:2~ X<(2w
Cii~ w<(I-O::
I- (J) 0.1-00:: ....~<( UJll.I-O::
Za: en ....<(<tu::> I-<t<tz
~<( <t ... mu~uo Cl)uwZ (/)u~o .
( w a: 0 .
UJ ..J ;:(J)I-<(~ ;:cn W ~cn UJ
\..~. >< J: ::>~1-9 ::>1-1-0
w I- ::) ~3ffi~0 ~....Jwu~ ~~ffiu~
::> CJ)
0 0.1- ll. :>~~~~ :>0:1-<(>-
W a:O::<tZO O::>~~!::
(J) a: 0::>:s:<!0:: 0::>3::2-
Zen Ull. (/)(J) _u (/)(/) _u
.
e
APPEND~X B
PROPOSED "PERFORMANCE ZONING" DISTRICT
r
,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA, RELATING
TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING CHAPTER 40
CREATING NEW DIVISION 23A TO ESTABLISH A DOWNTOWN/MIXED
USE DISTRICT; AMENDING SECTION 41 .053, CODE OF ORDINANCES,
TO ESTABLISH SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS
FOR CONDITIONAL USES PROVIDED IN THE DOWNTOWN/MIXED USE
DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Chapter 40. Code of Ordinances, is amended by the creation of new Division 23A
as follows: ·
Division 23A. Downtown/Mixed Use ID/MUI
Sec. 40.471. General description.
This performance-based zoning district is created to promote redevelopment of existing commercial and
mixed use areas proximate to downtown Clearwater.
Sec. 40.472. Establishment/contraction.
It is intended that four acres or more be provided to establish a new downtown/mixed use district and
that no existing downtown/mixed use district be contracted to an area of less than four acres, unless
the city commission by ordinance determines that a reduced area is in the public interest.
Sec. 40.473. Permitted uses.
Within downtown/mixed use districts, only the following uses (and structures designed to serve such
uses) shall be permitted:
(1) Multiple family dwellings.
(2) Indoor retail sales.
(3) Restaurants.
(4) Business/professional offices.
(5) Medical clinics/laboratories.
(6) Nonprofit social or community services.
(7) Commercial or trade schools.
(8) Accessory dwellings.
(9) Interval ownership and timeshare dwellings.
(10) Remote switching stations.
(11) Art galleries/studios.
(12) Funeral homes.
(13) Hotels/motels.
(1 4) Accessory uses.
Sec. 40.474. Conditional uses.
Within downtown/mixed use districts, the following uses may be permitted as conditional uses:
~
(1 )
(2)
(3)
(41
(5)
(6)
(7)
Indoor storage and/or warehousing.
Alcoholic beverage sales (consumption on premises).
Alcoholic beverage sales (packages sales).
Transportation stations.
Veterinary offices.
Wholesa ling/distributing.
Marina facilities.
19
.
.
(8) Residential shelters.
(9) Noncommercial parking.
(10) Manufacturing uses (including research facilities and laboratories, photographic processing
facilities, printing and publishing facilities, production of confectionery or baked goods, and
assembly of electronic components and precision instruments).
(11) Outddor retail sales, displays and/or storage.
(12) Child day care.
(13) Business services.
(14) Personal services.
(15) Gasoline stations.
Sec. 40.475. Use limitations.
(1) All alcoholic beverage sales shall comply with the provisions of section 41.071 and chapter 6.
(2) Accessory uses shall comply with section 41.1 21 .
(3) Marina facilities shall be located only on waterfront property where conditional use approval for
::I commercia! mar:na hils been obtained for such property.
(4) No operations or activities associated with any permitted use shall be conducted outside any
enclosed structures unless specifically permitted as a conditional use.
(5) Any emissions into the atmosphere associated with any use shall be odorless and colorless, and
pose no risk to the health and safety of persons in the vicinity of the use.
(6) All uses, whether permitted, conditional or nonconforming, shall be conducted in compliance
with the use standards contained in sections 42.22, 42.31, 41.32, and 42.85.
(7) For properties west of Osceola Avenue, indoor retail sales, restaurants, business/professional
offices, medical c1inics/laboratories, nonprofit social or community services, commercial or trade
schools, accessory dwellings, remote switching stations, and art galleries/studios uses shall only
be allowed as accessory uses to multiple family residential uses containing a minimum of 100
dwelling units.
Sec. 40.476. Dimensional and numerical development requirements.
The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within
downtown/mixed use districts:
(1) Maximum density:
a. 25 dwelling units or 40 hotel/motel units per gross acre for properties containing less
than two acres.
b. 50 dwelling units or 80 hotel/motel units per gross acre for properties containing two
or more acres.
(2) Minimum lot area:
a. For multiple family, hotel/motel, outdoor storage and manufacturing uses: 30,000
square feet.
b. For other uses: 7,500 square feet.
(3) Minimum lot width at setback line: 75 feet.
(4) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet.
(5) Minimum setbacks: Structures shall be afforded setbacks which measure not less than
hereinafter referenced nor less than any higher standard which may be applicable to a particular
property in accordance with the uniform development regulations contained in chapter 136.
a. Principal and accessory structures:
1 . From a street right-of-way: Structures with a height of 20 feat or lass shall have
a required setback of 10 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet
shall have a required setback equal to 20 feet plus 25 per cent of the height of
the structure above 20 feet, up to a maximum required setback of 35 feet.
20
r'
~
.
.
2.
From a side or rear property line: Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall
have a required setback of 10 feet. Structures with a height greater than 20
feet shall have a required setback equal to 10 feet plus 25 per cent of the height
of the structure above 20 feet, up to a maximum required setback of 35 feet.
From an adjoining residential zoning district (side and rear property lines only):
Structures with a height of 20 feet or less shall have a required setback of 20
feet. Structures with a height greater than 20 feet shall have a required setback
equal to 30 feet.
3.
b. Reserved.
(6) Maximum height:
a. For hotel/motel and residential uses -
1. For properties east of Osceola Avenue . 120 feet. except that such height
limitlltion shall. where applicable. be increased or reduced in accord with the
height bonus provisions. airport restrictions. and other regulations contained in
section 42.23.
2. For properties west of Osceola Avenue - 80 feet. except that such height
limitation shall, where applicable, be increased or reduced in accord with the
height bonus provisions. airport restrictions. and other regulations contained in
section 42.23.
b. For office uses. 60 feet. except that such height limitation shall, where applicable, be
increased or reduced in accord with the height bonus provisions, airport restrictions. and
other regulations contained in section 42.23.
c. For other uses. 35 feet, except that such height limitation shall, where applicable. be
increased or reduced in accord with the height bonus provisions, airport restrictions, and
other regulations contained in section 42.23.
(7) Minimum open space:
a. For the lot: 25 per cent of the lot area.
b. For the front yard: 50 per cent of the front yard area.
(8) Maximum floor area ratio: 1.0.
(9) Minimum building separation distance within a development: Each building within a
development shall be separated from each other building within the same development by a
distance equal to 40 per cent of the sum of the heights of such two adjacent buildings, but in
no case shall the separation distance be less than 20 feet.
(10) Maximum building coverage: 50 per cent.
Section 2. Section 41.053. Code of Ordinances. is amended to read:
Sec. 41.053. Supplementary standards by category of use.
+
(6) Child day care centers may be permitted within the limited office, general office, neighborhood
commercial, commercial center, downtown/mixed use. public/semipublic, limited industrial, and
research, development and office park districts subject to the following:
a. Sufficient on-site outdoor play areas shall be provided and so designed as to ensure user
safety.
......
21
.
e
b. Appropriate on-site loading and unloading areas shall be provided which are sufficiently
distant from other traffic ways so as to ensure user safety.
c. Within the research, development and office park and limited industrial districts, the use
shall be ancillary to another permitted or conditional use or shall provide, as its primary
purpose, service to a property containing another permitted or conditional use in the
applicable district.
d. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
.
.
.
.
.
(13) Indoor storage and/or warehousing may be permitted within the general commercial,
downtown/mixed use. and highway commercial districts upon determination that:
a. The building size, length and appearance shall be compatible and in scale with other
buildings in the immediate area.
b. All doors shall be oriented so as to be least visible from public rights-of-way and
surrounding properties.
c. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in preceding paragraph
(b).
.
.
.
.
(1 7) Manufacturing uses may be provided in the downtown/mixed ll~ and. research, development
and office park district~ upon determination that:
a. The hours of operation are compatible with surrounding uses;
b. The volume of traffic generated by the use is compatible with surrounding uses;
c. Any noise generated by the use is compatible with surrounding uses; a>>9
~ In downtown/mixed use districts. a minimum lot size of 30.000 sQuare feet shall be
~~Q for the use; and
Qd. The use complies with all of the general standards contained in sectien 41.052.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(18) Marina facilities may be permitted, except as provided in this section, in the beach commercial.
resort commercial 24 and 28, general commercial, .~ntown/mixed use. research, development
and office park, and public/semi-public districts, subject to the following:
a. Marina facilities are prohibited from locating in the following areas. which have been
identified as areas of high or moderate environmental significance: The north end of
Clearwater Beach, Clearwater Harbor grass beds, Cooper's Point, Clearwater Harbor
spoil islands, Sand Key Park, and the southern edge of Alligator Lake.
b. All proposed activities including, but not limited to, fueling, pumping-out, chartering,
living-aboard, launching, dry storage, and the servicing of boats, motors, and related
marine equipment, shall require specific approval by the planning and zoning board in
order to be permitted.
c. A commercial marina facility operated as a primary use shall not be located adjacent to
"p residential district unless the owner provides screening or laqdscape buffering in
accordance with section 42.27. For marina facilities located adjacent to residential
districts, no fueling or launching facilities shall be located within 20 feet of the
residential property line, and no fueling or servicing of boats shall occur at such marinas
after 9:00 p.m. or before 6:00 a.m.
d. No fuel storage facility or sanitary pump-out station holding tank shall be located over
water.
e. The marina facility shall pose no hazard or obstruction to navigation, as determined by
the city harbormaster.
f. View corridors shall be preserved across the property in accordanco with the standards
set forth in section 41.131.
g. The use shall not adversely affect the environment, including both on-shore and off-
shore natural resources.
22
.
.
h. The owner shall provide evidence to the Public Works Department of sufficient and
acceptable wastewater treatment to serve the project.
i. For coastal areas, the owner shall provide to the City an acceptable Manatee Protection
Plan. Appropriate speed zone signs shall be posted to control boat speed for manatee
protection.
j. The owner shall provide evidence of adequate spill containment areas on the subject
property.
k. Landside sanitary facilities or a sanitary pump-out station shall be provided, and shall be
available to marina users 24 hours a day.
I. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
m. In the event of conflict betweon those standards and foderal or stato law or rules, the
federal or state law or rules shall apply to the-extent that those standards have been
preempted. Otherwise, the more stringent regulations shall apply.
. .
(20) Noncommercial parking may be permitted within the residential, limited office, general office,
neighborhood commercial, North Greenwood commercial, downtown/mixed use. highwav
commercial, and limited industrial districts upon determination that:
a. Single-family residential property may be used for noncommercial parking only when
such parking is accessory to a primary use in an adjoining public/semipublic district.
However, such parking on single-family residential property shall not be usod for any
portion of the off-street parking required by this code; such parking shall be provided
only for excess or overflow parking; the parking lot shall not be surfaced; access directlv
from the street or from adjoining residential property shall not be provided to a parking
lot located on single-family residential propertY; the area, lot width and lot depth of
single-family residential property used for noncommercial parking shall not be considered
in determining whether the adjoining public/semipublic property meets the applicable
diml:1nsional and numerical development requirements; and a conditional use for parking
on single-family residential property shall not run with the land, but shall expire upon a
change of use of the adjoining public/semipublic property.
b. The parking lot shall be designed, surfaced and landscaped in accord with all applicable
requirements contained in this development code; however, surfacing shall be prohibited
on single-family residential property.
c. Access to the parking lot shall not be provided directly from the street or from any
residentially zoned property adjoining the property which is the subject of the conditional
use application, unless specifically authorized by the planning and zoning board;
however, access directly from the street or from adjoining residential property shall not
be provided to a parking lot located on single-family residential property.
d. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
e. Noncommercial parking lots which adjoin residentially zoned property shall be provided
with an opaque fence or wall along all property lines adjoining the residentially zoned
property, and may be used for the parking of motor vehicles other than recreational
vehicles, semi-trailer trucks or cabs, commercial vehicles, buses, or vehicles designed
to transport wastes or hazardous or noxious materials, which are prohibited. Such lots
shall not be used for the parking of trailers, boats or boat trailers. Any lighting of said
parking lot shall not exceed the height of the opaque fence or wall required along all
property lines. However, a parking lot which adjoins single-family residential property
shall be provided with a landscaped strip of land not less than ten feet in width along
all property lines adjoining the single-family residential property, and any lighting shall
not exceed six feet in height and shall be screened at all times from off-premises view
from the single-family residential property by landscape materials.
f. No portion of any parking space shall be closer than ten feet from the property line of
any adjoining single-family residential property.
g. All applicable requirements of section 41.221 and section 42.27 shall be satisfied
without the granting of any variance therefrom.
h. Such parking shall not be required by this code to serve another use.
23
.
.
i. If the parking is provided on property zoned for multiple-family residential or
nonresidential uses, such parking shall be guaranteed to remain available through a long-
term lease or other appropriate instrument running wit:' the land for a term equalling or
exceeding the projected life of the use which the parking is to serve.
.
.
.
.
.
(231 Outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storage may be permitted within the general commercial,
highway commercial, commercial center downtown/mixed use, and limited industrial districts
upon determination that:
a. The outdoor use shall not adversely affect the community appearance objectives of the
city. In particular, no temporary buildings, portable buildings, tents, stands, trailers,
vending carts or like buildings or structures shall be IJtilized in conjunction with the use.
b. In downtown/mixed use districts, outdoor storaQe. sales and displa~f boats and
motor vehicles shall be prohibited.
k.:. In downtown/mixed use districts. a minimum lot size of 30,000 SQuare feet shall be
provided for this use.
29. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in preceding section.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(27) Rosidential shelters may be permitted within the multifamily residential districts, and the limited
office, neighborhood commercial, general commercial, .Qgwntown/mixed use, highway
commercial, limited industrial, research, development and office park and public/semipublic
districts upon determination that the use complies with all of the general standards contained
in section 41.052.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(29) Transportation stations may be permitted within the general commercial, downtown/mixed use.
highway commercial, and public/semipublic districts and the bayfront subdistrict of the urban
center district upon determination that the use complies with all of the general standards
contained in section 41.052.
(3QI Vehicle service may be permitted within the beach commercial, general commercial,
downtown/mixed use. highway commercial, commercial center and limited industrial districts,
upon determination that:
a. All service bays shall be located within an enclosed building and all servicing shall be
conducted indoors.
b. Entrances to any service bays shall be appropriately oriented with respect to adjoining
uses.
c. All used tires, parts, and similar objects shall be stored in a building or other enclosed
structure.
d. Careful distinction shall be drawn by the board with regard to the type of service to be
performed. Major repairs, including engine or transmission dismantling, painting, body,
fender, muffler, top and upholstery work shall not be allowed unless specifically
permitted by the board.
e. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
(311 Veterinary offices may be permitted with the limited office, general office, general commercial,
downtown/mixed use. highway commercial, neighborhood commercial, and beach commercial
districts upon determination that:
b.
All activities shall be conducted within soundproof, air conditioned buildings with no
outdoor cages, runs or other outdoor facilities unless determined by the planning and
zoning board that such facilities are located and screened in a manner so as to not
advorsely affect tho use, enjoyment or valut! of surrounding properties.
There shall be no overnight boarding of animals unless determined by the board that
such boarding facilities are sufficiently soundproofed, air conditioned and are made
available only to animals requiring veterinary treatment.
a.
24
f~i~'.;,.
L~"", ~
r.',~. .
.
.
~',t" ,
c. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
.
.
.
.
.
(~
(33) Wholesaling/distributing facilities may be permitted within the general commercial
downtown/mixed use. and highway commercial districts upon determination that:
a. The size, mass and scale of any structure used for slIch activity is compatible with
surrounding structures.
Q... The DrODosed access. site desien. and vehicles used in ~ration are comllatible
with surroundine uses.
!Oh. The use shall comply with all of the general standards contained in section 41.052.
Section 3. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be consistent with the City of
Clearwater Comprehensive Plan.
SAr.tinn 4. This ordinance shall t<lkl3 13ffect imml3diatlOlly IJpOn adoption.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND AND
FINAL READING AND ADOPTED
Rita Garvey
Mayor-Commissioner
Attest:
(
Cynthia E. Goudeau
City Clerk
Approved as to form and correctness:
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
City Attorney
Q
25
.
.
u. ....:::::::::::::I::::...::i::::::..
o iIf' it:) iiii~~tt}
---@:i:l:ii:i:i:::::::;il"::::::::Il:::::::rwater
~~:.:.:.:. ".:.:.:..: : '.:.:.". .
::::::::: ".:.: :. .:. ". .
..... ..... ..
.....::::~::::::::.:... ..:.::~::::::::::::.
-' .
o
Interoffice Correspondence Sheet
TO: Mark Parry
FROM:
Kelly J. O'Brien
00
DATE: March 13, 2000
SUBJECT: North Osceola Avenue Right-of-Way Vacation Request for Osceola Bay Club
COPIES: Don Melone
The applicant is requesting the vacation of the irregular 40 foot right of way of North Osceola Avenue
lying North of Jones Street and South of Georgia Street. The applicant is proposing to use a portion of
the right-of-way and adjacent properties to construct a 150 unit condominium complex. The City has
existing water, sanitary sewer and natural gas mains within this right-of-way. PW A / Engineering /
Production has no objection to the vacation provided the water, sanitary sewer and natural gas mains are
relocated at the applicant's expense, and an adequate utility easement is provided over their new
location. Florida Power and GTE Media Ventures have no objection provided the applicant bears the
expense for relocating their facilities and grants an adequate easement over their relocated facilities.
GTE and Time Warner Communications have no objection provided the applicant bears the expense for
relocating their facilities and maintaining service to customers affected by the proposed vacation.
fl-{X)-O (-()3
'~'V<~ '.! I.. E
1 ~~;:-Pm
(3/20/00 MON 13:51 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
~001
.
.
Brokerage
Management
Investment
Development
Consulting
MLG COMMERCIAL
New America Infernatlonal
13400 Bishop's Lane
Suite 100
Brookfield, WI 53005
Office: (262) 797-9400
Fax: (262) 797-8940
htlp:/Iwww.mlgcommercial.com
Offices in Appleton, Wisconsin
and Huntsville, Alabama
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO:
Lisa Fierce, City of Clearwater
FAX NO:
727.562.4576
FROM:
Paul J. Hinkfuss
DATE:
03/20/00
PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 3
COMMENTS:
Please distribute this letter to all members of the City of Clearwater Community
Development Board before the meeting scheduled tor Tuesday, March 21, 2000.
C~lme~:~~ CP8
r~ ~f:R ~ ~J2~r~~ (L (j)/Oh)3
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this facsimile transmission is confidential. It Ma 1$0 b ri
work product or proprietary information. This information is intClndCld for the e)(olu$iv$ I,Ise of the addressee named
above. If you are not the intend8d recipient, you are hereby notified that any ul!ie, diseloSurli!, dis$4i!mination, r;listribl,ltion
(other than to the addressee named above), copying, or the taking of any action b/;!cause of this Information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please Immediately notify uS by telephone to arrange for the
return of the documents.
r-
r.", ~,;~~i'"
"".,:t.'i
03/20/00 MON 13:51 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
141002
..
.J
.
.
BrOkerage
Management
Investment
Development
Consulting
..
MLG COMMERCIAL
New Americs Intemstlonal
March 20, 2000
13400 Bishop's lane
Suite 100
Brookfield, WI 53005
Office; (262) 797-9400
Fax; (262) 797-8940
http;f!www.mlgcommercial.com
Via Facsimile
Ms. Lisa. Fierce
Planning and Development Services
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearvvater, FL 33758-4748
Offices in Appleton, Wisconsin
and Huntsville, Alabama
Re~ CDB OO-lllFL 00-01-03; Request by Osceola Bay Development, LLC .
for a Flexible Development Approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment
Dear Ms. Fierce:
I am writing this letter on behalf of Michael S. and C. Margene Zimmer regarding the
above referenced request. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer own a condominium unit in the
Belvedere Condominium development, which is located in the 300 block of North
Osceola Avenue. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer wish to register their strong opposition to the
three components of Osceola Bay Development's request
First, an increase in height from 30 feet to 179 feet is totally unreasonable. Such a
dramatic height increase would block the view of many of the units in the Belvedere
development as well as the view for many others. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer, and I am sure
many others, purchased their property with the reasonable expectation that an established
part of the city would not experience future dramatic change~ particularly a six-fold
increase in neighboring height restrictions. This change would only benefit the
requesting party at the great detriment of other owners and residents such as Mr. and Mrs.
Zimmer.
Second, the requested change in density is also unreasonable. Increasing density by one-
third guarantees increased congestion and traffic problems, again at the expense of
current residents and owners, This area of the City is already too congested, and to add to
that congestion by increasing the permitted density is contrary to sound public policy.
Also, it appears the increase in density would be at least partially the result of increasing
the height limit, which as I pointed out above is not fair to current residents.
COMMEH.Cl1\L REAL ES1'A'J'f: S.~RVlCES WORLDWI.DE,
INDIVIDUAL MEMBER OF
--". sK9
(3/20/00 MON 13:52 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
14I 003
.'
.
.
.
Finally, the Zimmers are also strongly opposed to vacating Osceola Avenue between
Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola is an important con-idol' through the City. To
simply eliminate a section of it under any cirewnstances would be poor planning, but to
do so when a developer is proposing to significantly increase congestion and density in
an already overcrowded area is outrageous
Moreover, Osceola Bay Development would seem to have no more right to use that
vacated street than other adjacent property owners, such as the Zimmers and other
residents of the Belvedere Development. Hence, if the street is vacated, which I believe
would be a terrible decision, then Osceola Bay Development should not gain exclusive
ownership of the vacated roadway. Belvedere Development could put to productive use
part of the vacated street.
[n sllmmary, the requested changes would benefit only the developer to the great
detriment of the owners of nearby properties. For the foregoing reasons, the Zimmers
respectfully request that Osceola Bay Development's request be denied.
Thank you.
:01~'
Paul J. Hinkfuss
Assistant General Counsel
CC: Ann De Poole, Manager
Belvedere Homeowners Association
300 North Osceola Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33755
Members of the Community Development Board
I \oa\sysldata\investsllegallpjhl<:lmmc:rlc:t.doc
It
.
Fi'erce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Stone, Ralph
Wednesday, March 15, 2000 10:30 AM
Roberto, Michael; Arasteh, Mahshid
Asmar, John; Hardin, Cyndi; Fierce, Lisa
RE: Inappropriate closing of Osceola Ave for the proposed Osceola Bay C
mike-this is the issue i mentioned yesterday that came up at the old clearwater bay neigh. meeting i went to on mon.;
they all claim that they use osceola ave as a bypass for n. ft. harrison; they say that t this will even affect residents in
dunedin; they are gearing up for a battle hear; however they seem to support the project otherwise; we are going ask
traffic engineering for their opinion of the impact of vaction on osceola ave.; the salvation army also is deciding where
they stand reo the vacation issue
mashid-by copy of this email would you have your transportation engineer/consultant review this; your drc member
should be aware of the extent of the proposed vacation; we will need this by april 6 to incorporate in the staff report on
the project; thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, March 15,20007:43 AM
To: 'callcookie@webtv.net'
Cc: Stone, Ralph; Asmar, John
Subject: RE: Inappropriate closing of Osceola Ave for the proposed
Osceola Bay C
Cookie, I have been out of town for a week, after I get back on Thursday, and hear from staff I will get back to you.
-----Original Message-----
From: callcookie@webtv.net [mailto:callcookie@webtv.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14,20007:14 PM
To: mroberto@clearwater-fl.com
Subject: Inappropiate closing of Osceola Ave for the proposed Osceola
Bay C
Denying access to a public thoroughfare is detrimental to the cultural
values that are now and have been present in the old Clearwaer Bay
neighborhood. Please outline the compensatiion for theloss of oir
inherent rights to public property and the degradation to our community.
Pleae contact me at your earliest convenience. Cookie Trigo Gilreath
FILE
.
CoLt ~(n Jcro
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Stone, Ralph
Thursday, March 16,20007:08 PM
Fierce, Lisa
FW: Blueline CPD - Calls Re Vacating Osceola S1.
lisa-please contact these two and let them know we are asking transprotation engineering to eval. the request; thanks
"":- ----~~--~--~----...~_._-_._-- -------- ---- ---- -
-----Original Message-----
From: Klein, Sidney
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 11 :52 AM
To: Asmar, John
Cc: Stone, Ralph; Stewart, Gregory; Hall, Donald; Lee, Wilton
Subject: Blueline CPO - Calls Re Vacating Osceola SI.
John - On last night's Blueline CPD show, I received two (2) calls expressing
concern about the proposed vacation of Osceola St. for the new condo project. I
told both that I could not answer their questions and would refer same to
Planning for a response. I know that both callers are on the board for the OCB
association. Would~ . e ]y. Thanks.j,U- g/t7 /2:{0
atIiYMIfam 461-1929. ~ ./U~ ~ ~
Cookie Gilreath 446-7192 (President, OCB)..~# n (q'L l t J.{ I ~
~.-
kD0 ~~ ~
It\) \J ~\'\~~ ~/
\.0
\;~
1
FILE
(ke))~. ~
wJo
tl- Db .-{){---u?
H~
,. =-
~. it:) ..0))
fev Ann ~ 'ftDJ :
?jX) Cf::L~~ ~.'
9'5 UrYt~
[.un ~ (~ 6b 16-v...'^. ~
Co ~Dp U (\iJ/)
( ~ <::. ().\v~ .1- ~ ')
".:""~
t"
If
f
/~
l ".'"
r "s"'"
" "'/.,i I
/'\
~T,~~
ill
l\
~
J
,r....,
\)1
"\ '
\.1 '
\J') I
~
~)
"
\)
\("
,.
()
o
\{\
.
\Q!
<
"
l~.
':
~:
\2;
~
(j
Ll)
~
~
~
a
o
f\()
..
~
I
i
. ~
i
~
I
~
I' II
, ,
L~
l
'4__L
r :
\" i
i }
\ ~ i
)
\ J
\,..-,......,.
-t.- -.I..c>.
,
~
,~
" .. ~ ., .... ~
... 4'
:. ~ ~ . ;. ri
..
~, ~ .., -, ... ~
. ~ .~ ~
I
,
...':. . ,." .tt'. .. .. .
.... .. ..
t
I
.
It, . .
.' ~ .
J "
" .
~ J .:
~ . :
~, ,", .,
Ii l 7
. · I ..
!: . r: " It
~ 4
.I . ,
~ " ~ "
{ . {I ,: J
, ..
. . !'
. :-
.. io .
,i I 1 , ~
" .. .. i .
n
..
0'
j:
J'
.: \
11
I
- - . i'
: i
" i :!' ! !Ii: :ii
",) II! (~:" '..v~1 r'" !I:
I: I' : , I" I d:
f' , , ;' II'
, I ' , I II,
. . ", r" ~_.. . HI
,1.-..)-11 ': I -111! ~l'~~ I'::
;t'll"l~'j~ ! .ii
I -4l , - .1 '-4 'I
I .-..\J '.. j 'I ..;
1..;~
t
.t..!J;" t
1 - -."
: (~I~~
t' . -'11
I r.~ ~J
i ~:
~.- ~---
j'--.-;;) ~~
, Ii,
~- . + I
i ..-;-, liJ.....J
:A-) I
L....._!
'I
"
1-, .
j
I
I
t
~
I
I
~
,..-- .- 't
, ~il
~.__._- i~i
, ..... I.J
, I":) :
lp,,'~ II
-
I '~~r---i' ~
,I ''''1'' fl" j
~) ..j ! -'~1-"~;1 ~ .~ t ,
I ~ I . ~ll ',!1 ;
- -- - I. .,., ~-~:~.!."
":1 ~- ~ :-j ~~~~"JJ:~' 2
I "'1f ."
I ill :. ~
(..) 1 . {,~ t ..-.;,- tll' ~~ ~!" j
I !-"~lJ
r- -(~rr r-~ ~ r " ~1
C. --, ~ ~_. '1t! L-'l't-, i I ... '-~',-:
(~ 1 I (c- ~ J', I Q t- J I ,~, ,t -
. J ,<) , .~: I i'
_ ~.. L.__.. I.. ..
- o.....":~. --
n ~"
I - II,' I I
'I: j' ~1:1. @ ~ I
J ~ I
!I -~~ _,. . ..~i L.::...: ~I!
!l i : ~I II:
'i j" l-~ 1 ~ 1i;
1 (." L.__~i
_.- . 0..... ".u. ..
1. (3)J] F@rhr (:y R., r-~~.~t~' [,'rtjl r-'")l, i0r~~ li
. '", ~~J r-~ 1~J [- ~. LJ 'I H ~ ---";J J t - '~~~J n~ 0
':"';; \, I I~ l \4, I ~J t: l ~ !r I '<.I iI 5,; :.I
I I. ,--li I ~-_:.j I. ._~. ; . :I, ....=-11 ,L_._~ ~;"
~. ,,"I.. 1'+#", 1+ ""'1- . f, "g';... ",,, . Jo,,, d. f'" "'L --.hr:~
.., ..", I" I I' .'r:I,~ .. .""L ..
~} i -0J :'(1
'I .~'11
'I ~. ,.~ j.. . .
! : '
I~~ t
I ~ .
I _ I
...,., ..w": I' I
, .';% :
.i
"
'I
I
I "
\ :;
I ?
. ,
i
t!
o
i
f
I
I
II
I
II
II
11
!,
"
., ""'1'>1
il I -
II i" -._
d;~
w>1 ~~
~.~_.~-1, L~
,J. ...-w
/ L.:'
1 .j : ' I ;', "1' ~~;;. -+hI I 1.
I , ' l' ' ' ~
_._. _.._.,_., -+.J.-_. .... L L _..._ "'__ -J.--. ---~-J._-_.- h 1 ~
I ..Q:.... I .o:L. IT ..~:~ · J ..Oo:L 1 I ..tJ;.I- .(}~t .O;L
.
, $
,
~
or . ._~ r-11
_~) Jh l_~-)Jr 1
l r.:\ i~.J I ",..J
. .~i .. L'.:l
....-0'
r"
...-
. . _""~'_""_ ~_..- ---- ~~. -. O~"f\I.' ,--...- ..- --
. ....-/ 1....,..'1-
////[~ r~JJ [3J ~f1i[} ~lJ - .W
r:~-- . ';.,TlI ~~,TITr ;;;,IB 11 :; \\~r- 111- :;.11'
'Ii
~
"
^,
~';.
..
~~
i'
,,"
. ~
"I
~;
~~~
:l .
i;j
tlhr
I-~~.
...~~
," I
I -'~.~ (,
U!J
P
I
l
II
:l
"
~
o
r(\
-J
\
) ~,. ----
a
\ ,;!
,..- --.J
~ 0 <o'~
~, ~ 5'~
~e~o
[~)]
r
I
[ .,0'\ ~ "
[ ~j'
r
..
i '~)
.
"')
'. ,. ,..
..'-~_..-
\J
L
!t'
-j ,
.J ~
"
~
~
T
!
z
(
r"
,
I
H" ,,1111
f ~",~ 'J~~>I
" t ~.., ,I
... '. ,It-,.,,,
.,- · .._~""jJ
L
I~
r-
.<
. 4..
,
,/
tf'
~
J
!lJ
. .
I . i;"'.l
I
r-
I
If)
I ~ r
I 'Xl .
..' ' '~ . t '!
~ . 9 ~ . J t
I ~
)
I um:
~. : : ',,;\i ~ . J-.-
I .'
;L
u
I [-. ""'-f,
. II
I .. . \~.u
I
I r
I
I I []
I
I
I
I ~_.. -"!'1 r-
(~i\ I I
I ,
L. I
. ,j ..-
... . . ~ .. ' ,
,
I I :
r
t3j ....
.~
.., ;
_.. . I
.j t
,.<)
--r .. 111
"5
cl
...:,
,t
;1\11
~
~i)~
?/J0
?)of/
~lO
~1Z,
400-
1o~
tfo,+ tQ
qoro
1;0 (
~O?
4tTD J1JyLe s
4!o ~
f1.Cnft/
J
!g-~~~
~ i(
_.
~f~
:~ .
G, ~ d-~ ();a,~f~ ~
1 vw ~\[\h.4
~~
I tit AnfbY1"L05
it vI
i
III L I I
I j
~14 &~ -ek-~.
. f Ii/) e. .1.
()~C~ - {~ (Iff C; ,
, :. IbIo #0: . ..... 1 ·
I '0ti'..L/ l-
~~r /t
~eroJ-
~i .uf-O-L
.3t:J
&cV
400 (2rvY1W
q{ 0 L-~
J; HlOj
III II. ~ _
co = ~
'0
N
~ !
tz..
gE-t
aJZ
o ...
0::0:: (W')
O~OI
tC~C'"
o::e-.ZC\l
<<0
:C~U
o ~ __
.. W .~
LLI
f!:
(I)
t
~
~
-
.Ia
< ~ ~
(3
cr:
o
w
"
0..
co
'DII)
o .,
~ ~
CID 0) 0
-
a o~
~ ;;51
~
I
.,
...
..,
~.
~5I
.. ..
~ ;;
3n~
..
a
~
I
00"
I I
-~ .'
- ~
~
-
-
a
CO ~ en 51
~ l'- ~ CzJ
::> I w Zo..
..J l[.) cr: 0 0
(.")1 ... ~., 6
~ u
ge
<
~6~ .~
Z
rzJ
-~
<
:J:
~
~
t
Y103~Sf .
..... ~
co
&.. ~
O!
~
::)
- PERIPHERY PLAN -
.
.
t .
c'
DOWNTOWN
CLEARWATER
CLEARWATER
CITY COMMISSION
"
(
MAYOR RITA GARVEY
COMMISSIONER RICHARD FITZGERALD
COMMISSIONER SUE BERFIELD
COMMISSIONER ARTHUR X. DEEGAN
COMMISSIONER FRED A. THOMAS
MICHAEL J. WRIGHT, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OCTOBER 7 I 1993
~~,~~)
FILE
tfW JDw> ~
L
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
.
.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER
PERIPHERY PLAN
('
INTRODUCTION
As part of public discussion on the 1993 revisions to the City of Clearwater Downtown
Development Plan, areas on the oorioherv of the 1983 Community Redevelopment Area (CRA)
were also examined. As a policy decision, the Clearwater City Commission decided not to
expand the CRA into any periphery areas at the present time. However, the Commission had
specific zoning and redevelopment concepts for the periphery areas. This Periphery Plan
addresses these key areas on the boundary of the existing CRA.
FOur periphery areas are proposed to be added to the overall Comprehensive Land Use Plan
classification for possible eventual inclusion in the CRA. These areas are located adjacent to
the Bayfront district to the northwest, the Core district to the southwest, and the Eastern
Corridor district to both the northeast and southeast. The proposed land use plan designation
for these areas is Central Business District, the same as the existing Downtown. There are
no ~ changes immediately planned for the Northwest and Southwest Expansion Areas,
although a draft" performance zoning" new zoning district has been developed for Commission
consideration. (This draft zoning district is provided as Appendix B.) The proposed zoning
for the Northeast and Southeast Expansion Areas is Urban Center (Transition) and Urban
Center (Eastern Corridor). respectively.
Under the proposed "performance zoning" zoning district, specific, desired land uses will be
provided with substantial development incentives. In the Northwest Expansion Area,
incentives for residential uses will be established, although some manufacturing uses may also
receive development incentives. In the Southwest Expansion Area, priority uses include mixed
office and residential uses, as well as manufacturinglindustrial type uses.
A "use intensity" comparison of existing zoning districts and the proposed zoning for each
area discussed in this plan is provided in Appendix A.
While these areas are not currently proposed to be within the formal "redevelopment area"
for Downtown Clearwater, the areas are considered to be important to the success of the
Downtown because of their locational characteristics. The Northwest Expansion Area,
adjacent to both the Bayfront and Core districts along Clearwater Harbor, is considered to be
a prime area for residential development.
The Southwest Expansion Area, adjacent to the Core district, is a likely area for
redevelopment due to property ownership patterns and location adjacent to the Urban Center
(Core) zoning. The Northeast Expansion Area adjacent to the Eastern Corridor District is
important to Downtown redevelopment because of its location along the north-central edge
of the Downtown. This location, near small offices and single family residential uses, requires
that land uses in this area be carefully controlled. This will help the Downtown to be a "good
neighbor" to the surrounding neighborhood.
The Southeast Expansion Area, adjacent to the existing Urban Center (Eastern Corridor) zoning
district, is important to Downtown redevelopment because it contains property adjacent to
a large area of City-owned land proposed for redevelopment, as well as areas suitable for
mixed use (residential/office) development. There is significant public ownership of land in
this area.
Table 1 summarizes zoning and Land Use Plan proposals for these aroas.
'--
OCTOBER, 1993
.
.
c
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF EXPANSION AREA
ZONING AND LAND USE PLAN PROPOSALS
EXPANSION PROPOSED PROPOSED LAND USE
AREA ZONING PLAN DESIG~JA TION
NORTHWEST CURRENTl Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED -
PERFORMANCE
ZONING EMPHASIZING
HIGH DENSITY
MULTIPLE FAMILY AND
"HIGH TECH"
INDUSTRIAL ·
SOUTHWEST CURRENTl Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED -
PERFORMANCE
ZONING EMPHASIZING
HIGH DENSITY
MULTIPLE FAMILY AND
"HIGH TECH"
INDUSTRIAL ·
NORTHEAST CURRENTl Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED - URBAN
CENTER (TRANSITION)
SOUTHEAST CURRENTl Y - VARIOUS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
PROPOSED - URBAN
CENTER (EASTERN
CORRIDOR)
· NOTE: PERFORMANCE ZONING DISTRICT IS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
(~
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER. 1993
2
EXPANSION AREAS
The proposed expansion areas are discussed ir, more detail below. utilizing the following
format:
.
.
('
The Function issue refers to the discrete land use characteristics of each district.
Linkages involve the specific ways each district relates to surrounding development.
Assembly Possibilities refer to the ownership pattern, land use, property value, and
property condition characteristics of the district. These characteristics determine how
feasible it might be to assemble land for redevelopment purposes.
Design and Zoning Issues are concerned with the aesthetic relationship within and
between districts, and with specific zoning requirements thM must be either
established, revised or reaffirmed for each of the districts.
Priority land Uses are the types of land uses to be encouraged in each district.
NORTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
The northwest expansion area is an area of mixed residential. commercial, office, and quasi-
industrial uses located directly to the north of the Bayfront and Core districts. It is bounded
by Clearwater Harbor to the west, Nicholson Street to the north, the Pinellas Trail and Myrtle
Avenue to the east, and Jones Street to the south (see Figure A-'). The largest individual use
in this area is the City of Clearwater Utilities Group and Purchasing Division Headquarters
located west of Myrtle Avenue in the southeast corner of this district. There are also two
large condominium developments on Clearwater Harbor in the western part of this area.
FUNCTION
The northwest expansion area serves as a support district for both the Bayfront
and the Core districts. It has been added to the land use planning classification
for Downtown Clearwater for several reasons:
~ To include a predominately residential area into the Downtown
planning area in order to improve the functional relationship
between the existing Core and Bayfront zoning districts and this
residential area along Clearwater Harbor.
~ To take advantage of the linear park offered by the Pinellas Trail
to encourage higher density residential redevelopment of portions
of this area.
~ To make allowances for supplementary commercial activity in support of the
higher density residential development.
~ To provide a location tor less intensive. "high tech" industrial
assembly and manufacturing type uses in close proximity to
Downtown Clearwator.
(.,
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
3
.J I KAWAl.L /~___'.L I 1
ft ~ 4:-= -- _u -- -7"1
~:jY;}~_.~~ . ---'l---L-..
\;.: .,' ...... ;:;r- 8 NICHOLSON
;-...., . , ~ .. . >. ".' STREET
I . .... -=t3i~;'-:.~-I ~~'.. l If JIG/ J 7
I . ".1;/':': >:,"'~;f~1~~~~~~:~i- ~~";"'" /.,~-Z~~~'-',?J tu-n}~/~l i~li
I ',/ ,'.:,.'.:'! .... J~ "" ," ~ ....: li'.>;''''''I.1/ 'J / 7//r' .>: I"."
I l':::':;~~ ;~f;;t:,'g7l~f I "r'--, L II ~l:A;.II'\ 7~' ,OC
:" ~,; /l..,6 .-f,: hc,~" Un_ - .::.;'~' :1:'
"',:. ',:,.' ;?is,)' ,;:': <fi,u::,' '....;!. .. I: r.",'(:.'U Ie 'rr ~'i,~i ,':7~
~ I,?:>;:;""; ;i;', L,:.;,,>.:>..:SEM,'N~ STRE~T I
\':'1,]1: :' ",.:,::. I... ;.:> ,,:..!..:ll:. "'---7' l II 7"/c';;;d' ...
__ ~_, ,".Y,';".,:. ~';,;.:,. l.J:t.::, \':7<>,/),-;;:: I ~ Jl ~. .r run
--.1" /~: :/'. .'1 'I.Ii;:,~ ~I .
I "'-__________ # Y7 ::iJ..'1I,..::jt. . u f,.~, j1
I ~'E. 7 / / -"'- 1/ biI.!----:t --Ill--
------------[--m--------/::\r LORtOGE . 'Y
}_u________ un-uu--d:. 111111 l I v,':',.,-a.. 0:>>I~;.~..~_ 10 = 401__b --l--"
.-__________]_____________" " ,,"""/ T i',':.;" I i'l~
I ~ O' ", , ',,~?---1---- -
r <, ;1~.~..'::f')},:rf,?!;i.,,;'/I,t:J I .,.', ',:,,' I
I _____un_ -----------..-~.c;,~.~!. ("rJll'~:!.'':'' ,'I:3TT,;;-I'1 ,'. - .. ~ ---- "
,.----------r------------ " ". ,.r- 100:..:..: ., "7 ,,,i,":: - i >'< , ~
:__________4_ GOVT lilT :! ~'h':;i':;.,:).",:;I~,;fl.. h:';o,,-;;j h"'" 7." ,/ u__, ,
, GOVT LOT ~ '~'~~W:j~'...~"~ '/1',.' \ n-;.;'--:--' u_u__ - n__ ..--
:--------~ru---u--~..<:;::;.\~I~. ;,:..,,;..~, ~\~I ::-::;,\".'~,'~..'" G...MAP.LE S.T v
~.:i r::'~.~::7-,~-~.-..7. _u > ,.',,; ,;J ~ ]
I~-------'it---.---------t;'.r.....-:"--.----.:-- \ __1-_ ________.. ,..T.I' I' .,"', ,.1 ~ ~
!.u - ,.... 7
~I -- I- :"'L:..;;.. z ..,.t"
I S l-7~ I, ~t::=
aJl Ci~ :: !i-
I_____.::------u--------- 8 GEORGIA Sf ~ ': (!) - I JI
: I ,.".,.,..f,~:'..l.. II ; - p'l
~ ____________u_ _.---;':-.:~~':'~7,?;~~ ~ ----'''~~.,,\ ....:; T m---1
: ---- I' - --~'.~".~.~~~,~,~;::.y,(~:: ~'.!) .- --
I ,--..---------- ~ -.--~'---- ;g.,.c."..
i______...____..________~;.~\'~:)l:l;tJ:h~,:;':,;fi z ~ L- II I HART
. J ~l'1:--..:..''f.{_~....,~.to\..'lt''.'.J..~,; > T
,------1-------------- ,'" ."," , ..p, "!"'" -..... - ~: :
: A- ~:::fi~~*f:~;~'~\~! <l: ~ · :
i------r-------------- ' ,,','l'.... ' ..T~ '.: I
: ~.::;;..:.:l.::~':':': .-"" : T -.--.
~_____________________~ ,,-:;;-, I
I >",..'......." I I ........
/:<:5::'+>Z>,:>'-- : :---- :
.. (,.,:;:.:.~,r ......:' :,. ..: :
,
t ~~
~
., I:'
~'.,~
~~ ~
:} ';:~i;!t\"
<}..)\
t;'{'~~/r:;:.J~i
;.',
:""Y: .
':"A',~l."\~, ~ .,"';\
,.
.
.
-
,
",
:,'
I
"
..
,nlUt'" c:
. ~"
','", '",:'",0['
,.""'{.;"1""\ .,\..J~2
, f;',:, ,", )I 1":.!,.',"~Jftj~}r~."!f;r;~~;i\'l{~!:}~:~"kl'L~
,",\,;'9"'~
"li.,,;"'::"~~ir;~i~':Ji\ l;,_Jij~, ,;"1"" '" ;0, ,(,: !'\;
"Ii""
<Sho.dJ~
Lu1I>eR. ':11'f1uJ)
~u:(JUNttt
DER-UTI
I
.f
;
~
STREE:T I
.'
,
'.
['1',\."",'" .
,', ,--:; )" I.
.
.
Figure A-1
NORTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
CHARTER STATEMENTS
IN
ACCESSIBLE
ECONOMIC CENTER
UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES
GOOD PLACE TO LIVE
GOOD NEIGHBOR
ORIENTED TOWARD. THE WATERFRONT
LINKAGES
PINELLAS TRAIL
URBAN PARK
MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
WATER VIEWS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTY
o
KEY FEATURES
MIXTURE OF LAND USES
GOOD ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC BOAT LAUNCHING
PRIVATE MARINA
PRIORITY LAND USES
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
"HIGH TECH" MANUFACTURING
AND ASSEMBLY USES
MARINA FACILITIES
MIXED USE (RESIDENTIAUCOMMERCIAL)
PREPARED BY:
CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1992
,. ,'..l d.'i "
. i ;,';;.'t.iJ.. ;,~'" 'i''.. (, >,' ,(,~, . ~
.~'
'-'.
,
\.~-
,.''t.'.''
.
.
LINKAGES
The northwest expansion area is an area of widely varied land uses.
Redevelopment of this area with high intensity residential and low intensity
manufacturing/assembly type uses will create an area of strong support for the
Core and Bayfront zoning districts. Creating a resid€:ntial/job base in this area
will allow for a dynamic interplay between this area and the two adjacent
Downtown districts.
Improvement of this area's access to the existing Core and Bayfront districts
should be an important component of future planning for this area. Since the
area is being targeted for high density residential development, it is appropriate
to consider a new urban park in this area over the next five to 10 years,
depending upon the extent that new development occurs. Linkage of this urban
park with the Pinellas Trail would be a logical connection.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Private assembly of land in this area appears likely, especially along Clearwater
Harbor where there is a strong potential for higher density residential uses. In
the western portion of this expansion area there is a large amount of publicly
owned property, including the Utilities/Purchasing property owned by the City
of Clearwater. The existing, varied land uses in this area tend to undervalue
this property from a tax and market valuation standpoint, creating a pot~ntial
assembly possibility.
DESIGN AND ZONING ISSUES
Under the "performance zoning" approach proposed for this area, substantial
density and height bonuses will be provided to residential developments which
meet the criteria to be established. It would seem appropriate to allow tall
residential structures in this area in order to promote the scenic views of
Clearwater Harbor. Waterfront properties, because of their location, should be
somewhat more restricted in allowable height than properties further to the
east. The Pinellas Trail, which runs through this expansion area, will enhance
the livability of this area as new development occurs.
Industrial/assembly uses which are allowed should be controlled regarding the
types of uses and overall site design in order to minimize their potential
negative impact on surrounding residential development.
PRIORITY LAND USES
As has been discussed, the priority land uses for this expansion area will be
high density residential and "high tech" manufacturing/assembly uses. The
depressed property values, along with the general underutilization of the
property in this area, the relatively substantial amount of public ownership, and
the exceptional waterfront views offered by the bluff location along Clearwater
Harbor, are considered to be positive factors which will promote the private
redevelopment of this area.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
5
'\l.~;
.
.
:~J., ,.
SOUTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
,,~.
{
The southwest expansion area consists of an area of mixed land uses directly to the south of
the Core district. It is bounded by Fort Harrison Avenue to the west, Chestnut Street to the
north, Myrtle and East Avenues to the east, and Druid Road to the south (sse Figure A-2).
FUNCTION
Like the northwest expansion area, the southwest expansion area is also
considered to be a support area for the Core district and Downtown Clearwater
as a whole. The area consists of a variety of commercial and office uses.
Within this area, however, a variety of mixed residential/office development
should be encouraged, as well as possible low intensity manufacturing and
assembly type uses.
LINKAGES
As previously mentioned, the southwest expansion area contains a variety of
land uses. Promoting high intensity residential development and industrial and
assembly uses of a "high tech" nature in this area will allow it to become a
strong support area for the Core district. An urban park should be developed
in this area within the next five to 10 years in order to support anticipated
residential development. A regional storm water retention project is likely to be
developed in this area, and the proposed park could be designed into the
retention project.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBiliTIES
Assembly possibilities are relatively good in this area due to the variety of land
uses, but such assembly is hampered by the number of relatively small lots.
There are some properties of significant size under individual ownership; these
properties could be expected to develop first.
DESIGN AND ZONING ISSUES
Improved open space in this area could be achieved through the creation of a
regional storm water retention facility and through the development of an urban
park. Careful planning of these features could enhance the livability of this area
as new residential development occurs. It is important that the residential
development of this area be shielded from those industrial and assembly uses
that do occur. This can be accomplished through specific performance
standards for nonresidential development.
PRIORITY LAND USES
Priority land uses within the southwest expansion district have been discussed
at length above. These uses are:
.. High density residential.
.. Mixed residential/office.
.. Low intensity industrial/a$sembly uses.
~.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER. PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER. 1993
6
.;.:"'..,.......";<
.
.
z
o
VI
cr
~
:t
~
a::
o
&...
DRUID
.
l~
UNDER-UTILlZEI
?~ fJ],......'...'.'..
) ." >>\\~
.
.
Figure A-2
SOUTHWEST EXPANSION AREA
CHARTER STATEMENTS
iN
ft
UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES
GOOD PLACE TO LIVE
GOOD NEIGHBOR
LINKAGES
URBAN PARK
REGIONAL STORMWATER FACILITY
FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTY
KEY FEATURES
D
MIXTURE OF LAND USES
GOOD ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
",
0"
PRIORITY LAND USES
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MIXED OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL
"HIGH TECH" MANUFACTURING
AND ASSEMBLY USES
PREPARED BY:
CLEARW A TER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1992
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER - PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
.
e
NORTHEAST EXPANSION AREA
r
The northeast expansion area is a relatively small area containing a mixture of small-scale land
uses. It serves, to some extent, as a buffer between the more intensive development to the
south and the residential and small office areas to the north. Its boundaries are: Myrtle
Avenue to the west, Drew Street to the north, Greenwood Avenue to the east, and Grove
Street to the south (see Figure A-3).
FUNCTION
This area will serve a mixed use/support function for the Eastern Corridor and
Core District. The primary uses in this area will likely be smaller offices and
residential uses. In particular, the interior portion of this expansion area
(properties other than those fronting on Drew Street) is wel! suited fer
residential uses due to its proximity to both the Core District and surrounding
residential neighborhood.
LINKAGES
This area serves as an "edge" area for Downtown Clearwater. That is, it is a
critical boundary area which needs careful development in order to ensure that
the Downtown as a whole is compatible with nearby residential and small office
development.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
Assembly possibilities in this area are good due to a relatively large amount of
vacant land. Assembly for residential/office uses should be Apriority,
particularly when mixed use projects containing 50% or more residential
development are proposed.
DESIGN ISSUES
Due to the nearby location of residential and small office development, it is
important that the scale of structures in the area, as well as the type of uses,
be compatible with those nearby uses. The development requirements for the
Limited Office zoning district to the north of this area along Drew Street will
serve, to some extent, as a buffer for more intense uses which may be
developed in this area. However, this buffer area is not large. so it is desirable
that relatively low structural height and relatively low floor area ratio type
development is allowed to be constructed in this expansion area.
ZONING ISSUES
Because of the proximity of residential development, a less intensive zoning
district is appropriate for this area. Such a zoning district would promote
relatively low intensity type office development, as well as medium high density
residential development (up to 28 dwelling units per acre). In Appendix C. the
proposed modifications to the Urban Center District regulations include a new
Urban Center Transition (UC(T)) subdistrict.
8
, \ \,......
J;i
...:...'~ ",,:,:,:,,;.I,I;;j~ ' ~'."'.>~ ;,,~..;\'.,~'- "1- I_:-,u_~~-"::"i~':_''': .J
.
e
MO'iC
UNDER-UTILlZ
'?~
r:7:
u
.
.
Figure A-3
NORTHEAST
EXPANSION AREA
CHARTER STATEMENTS
GOOD PLAcr; TO LIVE
IN
GOOD NEIGHBOR
LINKAGES
SMALL SCALE DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL
KEY FEATURES
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTV
MIXTURE OF LAND USES
GOOD ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
o
PRIORITY LAND USES
MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MIXED OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL USES
1Ii
PREPARED BY:
CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1992
~I_\,.....j '., .' I :''''..''''^"""'';''.J",,l'
.
e
PRIORITY LAND USES
Within the northeast expansion area. the following can be considered priority
uses:
~ Medium-high density residential.
~ Mixed office/residential uses.
These uses provide an appropriate transition from the more intense Eastern
Corridor zoning to the south and the office and residential uses to the north.
SOUTHEAST EXPANSION AREA
The southeast expansion area is another relatively small area containing a mixture of small-
scale land uses. The boundaries of this are Myrtle Avenue to the west. Pierce and Gould
Streets to the north. Missouri Avenue to the east. and the northern side of Court Street to the
south (see Figure A-4).
FUNCTION
The function of this expansion area is. like the northeast expansion area. is to
serve as a support district for both the Core and Eastern Corridor Districts. This
district is somewhat larger than the northeast expansion area. and does not
serve as an"edge" district to the same extent. Due to existing development
patterns and the existence of a major arterial (Court Street) through this
District, retail uses have occurred and should be encouraged.
LINKAGES
The existence of Court Street and Chestnut Street within this area make it an
important in terms of access to Downtown Clearwater. Because of this access
orientation. it is important that development along these major accessways be
controlled in terms of landscaping and other appearance issues. Because the
area is promoted in this plan as a mixed use area having important residential,
office, and retail development possibilities. within ten years public investment
needs to be made in terms of an urban park (perhaps in conjunction with a
private redevelopment project or a stormwater retention project) which will
serve as an amenity for anticipated residential development.
ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
In this area. assembly possibilities are quite good given the relatively
underutilized development pattern, with the exception being the uses located
along Court Street. There are a number of underutilized properties in this area.
and some assembly for residential/office/retail uses is possible and should be
encouraged.
DESIGN ISSUES
As mentioned above. this area serves as a major entryway into Downtown
Clearwater. Consequently. remedial landscaping along Court Street is
oxtremely desirable and should be purslled to the extent possible.
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER. PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER, 1993
10
.
.
r
,
ZONING ISSUES
Because of the somewhat intense existing development along Court Street in
this area, Urban Center (Eastern Corridor) zoning is recommended. This zoroing
will provide the flexibility for the desired development and redevelopment of
this area. Few nonconformities will be created through this change in zoning.
PRIORITY LAND USES
Within the southeast expansion area. priority L1ses include:
~ Residential uses.
~ Office uses.
~ Retail uses.
As indicated in the discussion for priority land uses for the Eastern Corridor
District. property along the major thoroughfares through this area is most
suitable for retail uses. Residential and office uses can be provided in locations
not. directly fronting on these thoroughfares.
(
DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER. PERIPHERY PLAN
OCTOBER. 1993
11
11",,',.'1,/'
1,1' .~~.. <.j' Wt;A~,.;~,\A/\".":t.: tt':r.~~,~..:'''<':
.,~ ! .... !,', ',.'" t
, .',
"'. li,"'~" ,"':(,' " ;''th.,; <':;{,{~~~j~',;'i i:t (':!'.~' ....... ";'~T--"-;:-~',:'C:;:f~:-:=JTIT~~"'~~~;4,',;;~'r'~,':i"f~
e
.
UNDER
)~,,~.
~~-S
~
~
COIIIT
maT
","
<,
.
.
Figure A-4
SOUTHEAST
EXPANSION AREA
CHARTER STATEMENTS
t ~!
~i'
ACCESSIBLE
ECONOMIC CENTER
UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES
GOOD PLACE TO LIVE
LINKAGES
COURT/CHESTNUT STREETS
NEW URBAN PARK
UNDER-UTILIZED PROPERTY
D
KEY FEATURES
MIXTURE OF LAND USES
SOME ASSEMBLY POSSIBILITIES
PRIORITY LAND USES
RESIDENilAUOFFICElRET AIL
PREPARED BY:
C1..EARW A TER
Pl.ANNlHO AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1992
('
z
o
(/I
~
f
<(:5
)(0
_tJ
/'--':0 I
I'dj il-
D.t:
:c!
,
i
"
w
(/I
~
.
~ ~
_ (/I
(/I Z
Z w
w ~
~ Z
~ -
w
en
~
Q
Z
:3
Q
w
(/I
o
D.
o
IX:
D.
~
Ci)
-Cj
~
~
W
(/I
~
Q
Z
et
...I
~
Z
j::
(/I
X
w
L5
IX:
et
Z
!2
(/I
Z
et
Q.
~
.
"000
MIOVN
~t::l'1~
et<(NM
o.o..NM
::>::>~~<(
OOO~~--
NIOOOZ
.. .. ... ... ...
w
o
~
IX:
tJ
et
~q~O?O
IOIOVO>"':
.... ..... 't- <w-
.. ... ... ... ...
M
(I)
(I)
...
000
COCON
MVOO
~NcO
0..1010
.............
-'----<(
oq~--
1O....0Z
,"" ... .. ...
NIONO~
"M"...:~
... ... ... ... ...
~
w~ ..l
.~~~i!
ffittozeto
a:O_o..~
... '"' ... .. ...
000
,,0
--co
<( .
0..0>
::>~
oo~
NO
... ...
00 10M
N"':~
... ... ...
gl
W...I
.~~
(J)L1.r-
wL1.0
a:O~
... .. ...
.
o
Vo
Wo
-iN
000
~qo
.... ....
~oiO<(
o . .--
"MOZ
.. ... ... ...
MMCOOC'\!
. . . 'M
O>ooV....N
... ... ... ... ...
~I
W..l ..l
U- et
cnu:~~~
WL1.W<(O
a:0a:0..~
... ... ... ... ...
;"
...
Z
::>
~
o
<)
;Z
,:
...
in
z
w
p
a::
o
(jj
w
VI
::>
~I
...
...
o
Z
Z
o
N
~
en ..l~
W -(J)
a: .<(::>~
NffiluOZ~
Ua:a:_o..
... ... .. ... ...
o
100
"0
'M
0> .
"CO
NM
-- --
vM
00
... ...
~oo~
CO '00
....N~
... ... ...
...I
et
~
C)-JO
UO~
... ... ...
~
(J)
W
~
:r:
~
::>
o
en
o
OVIO
VOON
V 'CO
..... .
IONO
~iO~
MCOM
000
... ... ...
O>OOCOM
...:O...:~
... ... ... ...
..l
0.. i!
Z~-JO
Uo..O~
... ... ... ...
~
en
<(
w
:r:
~
a:
o
Z
00
O>WOO
....VIOO
. ." 0>
N N . .
....I'COl'
iO~~~
CO'<:tMM
. . . .
0000
... ... ... ...
V~........N
O~IriN~
... ... ... ... ...
-J
0.. i!
~c)Z-JO
o..UUO~
... ... ... ... ...
~
(J)
<(
w
:r:
~
::>
o
en
..:
~
o
VI
8
o
~
o
It
o
i::!
:-
w
o
~
o
>-
o
~
iil
'"
<l
'"
<l
?;
~
...
>-
!::
(/I
Z
w
~
~
o 00>
IOMOO 00>
ooOlOooIOM...."I'
o .OM.....-- 00
..... . 'MO><(OO--
IOMOOIO .O>o..~<(
ooMV....O>....::>o..O"
iOiOLn~~iOlO::>::>
~~~~~"':c.OlO~
OOOOOON....I'
... A ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
~
o
:::
"
o
Z
<l
..,
Q
l3
a::
<l
~
!!l
~
o
M
?
ci
\!:i
w
u
i!
~
o
o
w
...
~
M
w
o
~
a:
tJ
et
O"':V~oo....lOoo~l"'!
. . N . . . ..... (I)
M::V....MWI'IO....(I)
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
~
<l
8
..J
... "
~ ~
1f .. S
"'"
o~t;
i=::>~
~..J\ll
~~~CI)
~g~~
~~~~
00 )(
~~~:;
ffi~~fil
E~if~
~a:~u
- ~ ,.;:::
o",~z>
~e;\,U~~
U)ZXc...l%
t!!::>>-~~
~~tn'u..~
W",:lIlI!w
~ ';';:l '" I.'"
<l8Si2~
<n\!!XOU
~~S:.1~
iil::>\:l>-eIl
f5oz~1S
~l"~w!i
_ . 0 eIl_
wci:j::>Z
~~<s:a
~ ~ il
2.::B:
>:
:31~
t;~
zo
.
. .
~ V 00 CO -J
Z o..fE ~~'";"'?i!
2 .:::!ii:~8t35~~~g
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
~
en
W
~
:r:
~
a:
o
Z
...
c
en
en
~
<(
z
<(
.
'>-
en
Z
W
I-
~
W
en
;:)
.
10 en
1-<0 10 en
~~ v >-
v~col-C!!. ..J
... OZI' <(
I-CO~NWIO Z
~>-..J~~>- Z<(
aJW a..aJ wCC
~o~ogo enW
OWO~WW ~t
u:l ~ ..J<( <( ~ ~ CC CC
>W_~OW Ur2
WCCCCU..JCC Z
o U I- W -<( U i: enlli
..J~~o ~ IJJ
<( ..J 0 ..J \jj ..J z, .
i=<(z<(cc<( w~
~~7.~':':~~~en~
9w~wlJ..wlJ..en~o
enl--I- .1- .enl-..J
~252g2g2~~
en
(i)
>-
..J
<(
Z
<(
~
(i)
z
W
~ .~
i=
z
Wen
91-
fflz
cc;:)
I'
co
...
...
w
en
;:)
c
W
en
o
a.
o
a:
a.
...
>-
....
(i)
z
W
I-
Z
W
en
;:)
c:l
z
i=
en
~
M
I'
M
..J
<(
i=
Z
W
een
-I-
en-
wZ
cc;:)
:fi
0:
<(
z
2
en
z
~
~
I-
en
W
~
J:
I-
CC
o
Z
t
I
..J .
<(0
_en
CCo
1-0
enN
;:) .
010
zit)
_-=t
...
~ t
..J 0
~,(f)
CI:<(IO
I-z<o
~-v
...... CC .
e<(M
~~~
...
...
o
V
M
N
N
M
..J .
<{t
I- .
wO
CC(f)
...
It)
0'>
<0
V
CD
N
..J .
<{ti:
~d
CC(f)
...
.
o 01-0
<0 IOZC'\l
v ",:wco
o NI-O'>~tO
<oI-IOZI' a.. 10
I-MZ.....WNg...
z>-~>-~>-aJw>-
WaJ"::;aJa.. >aJ
~oa..ooowo
a.. 0 ..JwO
OW..Jwwen..Jw
u:l~~~~~~~
>WWWOCCCCW
wccocc..Jul-CC
eUwU-wenU
..J~u~~o;:)~
<(..JU:..Jw..J~..J
i=<(U-<(cc<(_<(
z i= 0 i= .: i= .: i= .
~zcii'ztzt:Lzt
en~!::~ .~ .~ .
wOZOOOOoo
cca..;:)a..ena..ena..(f)
o
<0
M
..J
<(
i=
z
w(f)
91-
en-
wZ
0:::>
...
o
10
I'
0'>
ro-
N
..J .
<{ti:
I- .
we
CC(f)
...
I-
(f)
w
;':
J:
I-
;:)
o
en
o
CD
V.
N
It)
,t
..J .
<(0
_en
CCo
I-N
en co
;:) .
0<0
ZIO
- ...
~
CI)
>-
..J
<(
Z
z<(
.- 0:
WIW
CI):I:
~~
CC;:)
Uu.
Zw
-w
t:;en
z'
w>-
..J!:: .
to(/)::
(i)Zo
(/)w....
o....w
a..~aJ
~t
u:: .
u-O
Den
...
...
o
o
M
CD
M
w .
uti:
u:: .
u.e
Den
...
e
(f)
!::..J ~
z<( co
;:) i= .. I- .
coZ 'z'"
l-I'wtwN
~~5d~~
~Cla..enoo
a..WI-IO..Jw
OenZN~en
u:l~~qw~
>CCa.......OCC
~UO>-..JU
..J~u:laJ~~
;$..J>fao..J
I-~~eni=;$
ZI- <(;:)1-.
weZWuWI-ZI-
w cc-wlJ..
en I- u: ut;;I- o'
wou.w_o
cx:a..Oo!:a..en
co
ro-
..J
<(
i=
Z
wen
91-
(f)-
wZ
CC;:)
...
o
-=t
-=t
It)
N
..J .
-I-
<(U-
I- .
wO
ccen
...
I-
en
<C
w
J:
I-
cc
o
Z
d
en
o
o
<0
0)
...
w
U
u:: .
u.1-
Ou.
...
It)
N
<0
o
N
~t
u:: .
u-e
Den
...
(/)
Cii
>-
..J
<(
Z
~<(
wIX
(/)w
~J:
0:1-
UIX
w;:)
eU.
t:;~
z ..
>-
..JI-
<(-
IX(/)
wZ
ZW
w~
c:l_
..J .
~t
o'
-0
I-en
;:)0
!::-=t
I-co
en .
z.....
_N
...
v
~;:;'J;';':1_:\t~~}I'8fb~""'IiiJj~;m,':l
.
=r==iI
CIl m
0 ><
C ."
-I l>
:r: z
m (f)
3> Ci
CIl Z
-i
l>
:xl
~
T T T m
><
(f)
CIlO CIl:JJ ::!
,;::;2 z
p-n om C)
. -n . -I - CIl
~Fn ~~ .....-1 C
to -
0-1 (f)
. , C m
, , Ul-l
I'-> w 0- Z
-..j w .0 -I
to to -nZ m
0 (fJ -l3> Z
0 to , (f)
0 , ::j
-<
T T .,. ."
:xl
0
."
CIlO CIl:D C:D 0
(f)
O-n pm 2m m
" -n " -I -(/) 0
~~ ::j~ -1-
(/)0 C
" , m
, , 2 (f)
..... ..... ::! m
0 0 )> Z
OJ 0 , -I
,,f:>. I'-> , m
en 0 en Z
,po 0 (}1 (f)
0 -.. ::j
-<
c::l-'" ZOO:DOOCiJ:D
mZo "-nmmmmzom
r--iC/') 1l-n1l-i1l<--iUl
Om(/) ::.o-::.ol> -i-
~Z_ mil ::.om(/)mO
. en c::l 3> m m r= m '.. Z m
- r- (/)0)>0)>0_-12
-1m (/) (/)-025>
-<z mmmmm:E:en ::!
O<O<Om-l')>
~~ rol!llll;!!roZ=iZ'
m_ -<O-<o-<'-!cno )>
m- .....-0 -0 iJ-i:om Z
..::;
-n (") o$:NS:;::;06m< )>
c :xl (}1mWm' -iz3>1!l r-
:xl ~ ~z;ozu;~)>~O -<
-I C/)
:r: (f) -..j-lU;-IO-lr-o-o (j)
m m ,f:>.-ooiJ(/))> Ill$:
:D_ 00 0 m
If (J)-t(/)-tP, ....-:z
pmom~ O'l-l
" z. 2 (}1
-I:::j-i. .....
2l- ---
3>. )>
," ,
I '1-
\.
')
...,
.
~ ~SMISSION VERIFICATION RE~ ~
TIME 01/19/2000 12:52
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
01/19 12: 51
94610670
~0: 00: 42
OK
ANDARD
ECM
FILE
~.."" ~
fL (jJ-ol-o3
~ . 11.0 F C LEA R W ATE R. .
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
MUNINCIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER,FL 33758-4748
PHONE(727)562-4567 FAX(727)562-4576
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO:
12, I?h Ire/fDv
FROM:
t19v ~i~
1!lg!OD
COMPANY:
DATE:
o Per your request 0 For review 0 Please comment 0 Please Recycle 0 Urgent
ONE CITY.ONE FUTURE.
,,'
.-. CITY OF CL._TER
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
PLANNING & DEVEWPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUlH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
(Name off all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION:
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
(Nature of request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
, A.D., 19 to me and/or
by , who is personally
known has produced
as identification.
SIGNED (Property Owner)
SIGNED (Property Owner)
SIGNED (Property Owner)
SIGNED (Property Owner)
Notary public,
My commission expires:
~""
t(tb[UOV ~ f/lY ~
IL~ --.--- r44JTYd/fi,-K:g~4!AIit!!Y_--
D~~!~/__&~A~/.__.~7.... ~.
u--H..-.-.---.-------~~~-1".< . '-":'-{JJZ_-~:
.~ i. ~J. ,) ..rJ:~h.d ... it. l. .
I'; -lD // j j~A ,!4/J I ~
...i . -1ft Me; U I to/PO:'
" I?? l;{2nvtfjw .._ .~=_.
/7/1// C~ .. ft.. [l).W-t
l I '-1 l/~ n~ d~Ntt~
-j./i;d 11I~~J( tl::< if!I,~;~ti.--~c~;~
-f. [g.-.^,. ~! t'-1/4."-fi.t-----5 . r?~ (.1'1-/..4'".--'\''' r
~~: filf;-C4YJ1UJ~~KtPt-~c
t;n 11#~ ~t.r -{(7r? ~CdefU4n4r
t! I t%~ fUr!Zf X f.t D( -pd1 ~
MJ k toN! 0Vl. <'/{ fYlA- M-gif
'7ItfJ . .. (/lufh ~ Pj t/~
rv OC;cW 40 I~o.:; ~:J1 :=enf
.wr~.~ ~~~I?:r:~
rr:J:f/JflfI~~~~~
~ t~ ,./7 (//JA) ~ /{J?) bttJ
J1u~
/' 1f=-lb.s~ (()f1/J ~ tv ~ U; -A..M/ 15-/7
~ * r7- 0
-- PP1~ hitftJ ~
/fJ4~ 41/1 e:-/~ql ~ ~1r~~
[tf_{FjI f;rwu ~~1J~-~~
~~..
~
,
aJ.-t
-1;DII~~ ~-~dfd
'b~
~. ~/I~ ~ Cet; If/ Ih
~ ~~~ ~~
I/?M tf: ~ ~om . ~ 1J;~w> fh ~
, ~
. tv ~(}/1/)1 ~ rl~
1J · d01Mr ~
17~ !5()/~~~?
1IL0 ':-112 / ~ ~ hfJM ~
~~-I"'~ 1-eMJ..- ~~
~~~
~ UW/ f'.U1J ~ r?u:t ql ~"3
p!&;r ~ 5~ - ~ 1; fittf ~l
.
~~I-f /t/jl ~)
ffJl/ohrv~ ~ f2pJ ~ flt (};cq~ -
~~ tt3 ~ 'fi-e-- /{U Wn fbJ ~ Iv-~
fHfdJ~ - ~ (]/lhd;t i .
~f~~. ~
u:ft9 0$ ~ [t;ko Jj~avu)
- - --
. a "' Le yvcJV,O[/dJ'
11/11901;D CEeLt- {!;IFf aJb
MJJ( F/en{ ;.MeA b;; 1/vw. ~ v.
~ 17JT~ ~ wl1# vlaArrtllJ drc.. ~LA f2f;w I
ir tD~ ~ fNlOOlVC" V/rUtflrJ
k- /trn IN tA ;IM;ftfff2IztAt3 - fiq;rz ~ f?J -
~ (
* j(c f!J!?-1MUf fkf2--UL
~ JrP f/J1l- II~,~
f?ol~ 4 Rich lreI/a + ~ &M~
4fJ
~
.\10
0D
IOPP-C M'- · FILE
It/t/1C1 ~ ~ CUll? rL--(X)-OI-~
~ ~ou W0
~ ~V1/{l~
cr ~ ({Jylne/
~st - ~ 10 ~ ctbcvvr ~
+v.s (JoM~~~ttt~
?~ ~~ +0 dv L~~ c.qCLtJ?~+~ t<..
O~L~k ~ v~~ - ~bt~~ ~
~ ~ orfln ((Vl
~ ~ a1ku~ (lJvJ1& ~~ ib V~~
~u~~
~ ~ {7;v +uu tLu.elL 0Y1 ~ ~J--e
0), ~iJl~ ~ -~~~.
.f L0-Zo' ~ blP(s-
~ c0t ~GJA.-~!:; ~ to
~~? ~ Wwun.~
N~ -to ~ ~ rwe~ Qut-f /lQ! (f!1~
6/CLeDt VcL~
Muti:O- LJ) v~1(J m: f(l)~ ~~c&k
~ -1D~ f{L ~
..
..
~
C>>:I? ~
:f~b L 0
UY\tGvVh ~ l
.
dudJ~ /.
~.?D
1210 :>
~c;s 10 a 'znil<8 ~f~ '10~-?
t4fth a~ +o;~~
r
rzr(OSi.J..JJ.,l0f~
TUvn1c6 tMAt~~~ CL2 ~
- [-tot<- t> L ctfflct +- L( W~ ~ '1 ~
V? ~t l 0 I c;~ L 0' rivt.- L[ ~f0uKs \7 J
~fn~lP--e?~
1; ~~~
· ~p~ p~ ~ l76 d~(SP::rdA)
c\(j),~ L0 D dlh
r itelcjlvt: L q-f1CJ()L$ l2-0Dkt) l8o!: ~ ~
~ ($4 · L~~ ~JD ks~
\~~1~~~~( -'\
L \~ "1 VLv) (~\\.Ulm ~ )
, ~ ~li\M 00 1- cACetU.~
o Cli~ lY1~: It~ V~i ~ ht u~
.. · FILE
l t{( ~ ~c...~ OJ"'DL/~
OSCce)] 0 ~ ClMh -~) (Hrz-b (:>tr;,~)
L-f/ CHI {Z~f' (N ()i,udD I~~ sf+'
JDYlLS stre.J-]
, It lv,l~
~(~ ~ ~VL1~M pttf~
fl>>~ { ~ M13
. ~ -~ ~ "W(J-tb~fDrk~
~ 0 J 0 ~C/ll,S ~L(€> -( 0~ alA.
[00 I f./~'f o<,~ "'(~t) - 'S #Vt -fflM fVu,;b\ -ftnrL
de.-vzv1lM
- Dnt~: 1Y-t v~~ JNJfh;~ .~ ~ ~
dWlL~ 1k VAb~ ~ 1v ~1' ~
~ ~ 1 ..
, thO ok ~ &woo (~
?Ul p~-- {"l~b f~O'i Jo LadUG
. . ~ vf':\ (~~ h~Vct-) -En fk,
~/ CU~rM' ~ ~
. V~~ Db U;CeP/D -=7 ~ ~ ft0~ u.
~ ~ ~ re.-u-)~ )3
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF
CITY COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
. 7- J'[e
FYI
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold a public hearing on
Thursday, July 20, 2000, beginning at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be
heard, in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the vacation of:
1. The 60 ft right-of-way of Third Avenue South lying East of U.S. Highway 19 and West of
Chautauqua Avenue (formerly Main Street). (Lawrence H. Dimmitt, III) V 99-13
2. A portion of the irregular 40 ft right-of-way of N. Osceola A venue lying between Jones
Street and Georgia Street. (Osceola Bay Development, LLC) V 00-06
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or
objection with the City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any
decision made by the City Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings,
will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN
PROPERTY ABUTTING THE PROPOSED V ACA TION.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK
DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE
ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD
CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 07/01/00 & 07/08/00
,.
.
..
"
Fierce, Lisa
't
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Stone, Ralph
Thursday, June 01,200010:20 AM
Roberto, Michael; Asmar, John; 'cmt@tampabay.rr.com'
Hardin, Cyndi; Fierce, Lisa
RE: Old Clearwater Bay and Osceola Avenue
jeff; there was no change in the developer's request reo height; they have always been at 179; the staff however is
recommending 164 feet in height; osceola is still going to be open one way to the north as agreed in the meetings that
you attended; this still requires a portion of the street to be vacated, but this is conditioned on the developer dedicating
new right of way to relocate the street so that it remains open;
the new info that the developer presented at the last meeting regarded the design features of the builiding; therefore the
Community Dev. Board deferred the decision to the june meeting so that we can review the design elements; the city has
retained an architect to review and advise us on the design elements; the june meeting is on the 20th so we will have our
staff recommendation reo the design ready by june 12; please give me a call that week and i will brief you on this issue;
562-4583; call if any other questions that we can help with
-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto, Michael
Sent: Thursday, June 01,20009:43 AM
To: Stone, Ralph; Asmar, John
Subject: FW: Old Clearwater Bay and Osceola Avenue
where is the response to this concern?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey McKinney [mailto:cmt@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31,200011 :40 AM
To: Roberto, Michael
Cc: Bob & Elaine Carter; Beth Goodgame; Cookie Gilreath; Kathy Milam;
Marieke McKinney; Michelle Fritz; Vicki Morgan
Subject: Re: Old Clearwater Bay and Osceola Avenue
Michael, I was out of town during the last development meeting but was able
to provide a letter from our group to the Osceola Bay Club developer, prior
to the meeting, indicating our approval of moving Osceola Ave slightly to
the east.
It came to my attention that the developer changed their plan to increase
the height of the two towers. I also noticed a sign on Jones and Osceola
which indicated that Osceola Ave may be vacated or turned into a private
road. Does this change the plan we discussed in March? Our current
understanding is that Osceola Ave will be moved slightly east and will still
provide northern access to our neighborhood.
If any additional changes occur with the developers plan, especially
pertaining to Osceola Ave, could you or one of your staff members please let
me know as soon as possible.
Thanks again for your continued support in this matter.
Jeff McKinney
President, OCBNA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roberto, Michael" <mroberto@clearwater-fl.com>
FILE COpy
fi rJ)- 0 I -- {; ?
To; "Wilson, Denise A." <dwilson@Clea.!,-n.com> .
Cc: IIIMcKinney Jeff" <cmt@tampabay.rr.com>; "Arasteh, Mahshid"
<MArasteh@clearwater-fl.com>; "Fierce, Lisa" <Ifierce@clearwater-fl.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 20006:32 PM
Subject: Old Clearwater Bay and Osceola Avenue
> Denise, please send this to the Mayor and Commission
>
> We facilitated a meeting today with the developer and representatives with
> the neighborhood association in which an agreement was reached that
appears
> to satisfy both parties. Osceola Avenue will be moved to the east at the
> developers expense, the road will remain one way. The representatives
from
> the neighborhood were pleased with the outcome and pending final drawings
to
> confirm these changes will let us know if they can support the project.
All
> final decisions will rest with the CRB and the Mayor and Commission.
>
2
....
.
~(~
LL. .
o
).,
f.-
o
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER" FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727)562-4576
TO:
'i -Vi'- ~ () \.\ S "'.
~L\ \"" - <;So 3-6
~\0\.{ ~\l\fJCho^,-
l-.O \\~ -m)
FAX:
FROM:
DATE:
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
Tran.
ss
on
Report
I-
Date/Time
Loca I I D
Local Name
Company Logo
6-13-00;11 :19AM
5624751
planning
city of clearwater
Th
s document was not confirmed.
e and deta Is below)
Letter-S
(reduced samp I
Document Size
~
FAX MESSAGE
~
ClTYOFCLEARWATER
l'LANNlNG" DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMlNISTllATlON
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATIB" FL 3375'
(717) 56J.-4567
FAX (7n)561-4S7'
~
TO:
~. ~ r 'r' T{\.o QJJJ'
l.\ lt2\ ~ blp "0
~ t~, >1)&" ^,
If' .\7'-..1J(l
FAX:
lIBOM,
DATE:
MJ:8SAGI,
NUMBER OFl'AGJ:S(Jl\'CLUDING 1mS PAGE)
Total Pages Scanned
11
Total Pages Confirmed
o
NO. Doc Remote Station Start Time Dur-ation Pages Mode Comments Results
1 332 946610670 6- 1 3-00 ; 1 1 : 18AM 0" -/ 11 056D
Notes
EC: Error Correct
BC: Broadcast Send
CPo Completed
HS: Host Scan
HF: Host Fax
RE:
MP:
RM:
HP:
HR:
Resend
Mu I t i -Po I I
Receive to Memory
Host Print
Host Receive
PD:
PG:
DR:
FO:
FM:
Po I I ed by Remote
Po Iii ng a Remote
Document Removed
Forced Output
Forward Ma i I box Doc.
MB:
PI:
TM:
WT:
WS:
Rece i ve to Ma i I box
Power Interrupt i on
Terminated by user
Waiting Transfer
Waiting Send
.
.
lL
......,.rw...,..........,.,.............,..,..,.........................................a.....................1....,. ,...f........................,..,.r"...,... '. ..........,.......', ~~
.............................................................. D
........". .....
...."" ."....., -,....
. .....".., .,..,.. ..,... ,..,
,."'..,,,.,,,'., ..0 II
.. ." ...
., ---- .".- --.' .",,- ----- ......
FAX MESSAGE
o
r'
!,-
O.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER" FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727)562-4576
TO:
~ \ (" 0 \ [\. 0 \lJLc~
L-\ l.Q\ ~ O{f; ,0
\JrlY'\A. t ~I\ t.._D ~ U\
(0 ,\:\. C5{)
FAX:
FROM:
DATE:
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF P AGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: June 20. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: B 1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Kenneth H. Roush
LOCATION:
400 Jones Street
REQUESTS:
· Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 174 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dwelling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and permit a six-foot fence within the front setback
along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street,
and
· Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan and site survey submitted by N orthside
Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 3.33 acres (including right-of-way proposed to be vacated)
3.24 acres (without right-of-way)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast corner
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
East Portion of the Site: 150 feet by 155 feet::t
West Portion of the Site:522 feet by 320 feet =t
Page 1
.
.
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vlclmty IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
UPDATE:
This case was discussed at length by the Community Development Board at its May 16, 2000
meeting. The Board continued the case to enable the applicant to finalize the elevation plans and
landscape plan. The applicant has submitted revised plans including amended building elevations
(with a lower building height), revised landscape plan, and minor site plan changes with an
adjustment to the vacation of right-of-way request. The application also includes approval of a
six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Georgia Street and Jones Street.
The City has retained an architect (Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe) to review and assist in modifying
the design.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.33 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Page 2
.
.
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
. Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
. Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
. Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
. Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification (instead of the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category ofCBD).
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
Based on the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current HDR zoning district, the site
characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff believes that the site is appropriate for
high-rise residential development. In determining the appropriate density for the site, the staff
was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future
density in the City should be located downtown where land and infrastructure are available.
Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical component of an economically healthy
full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central Business District is 70 units per acre in
approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the remaining center section from Myrtle
Page 3
.
.
Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units per acre. The transition from the
City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density proposed by the Osceola Bay
Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
areas will be the Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within two 14-story towers. Two levels of underground parking will be
provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated entrance/exit.
Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking garage.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, blue vertical
columns and flat arches. The east elevation of the towers incorporates a curved wall design.
Both the east and west elevations include extensive windows and balconies. The terracotta color
clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates
the use of cupola-type enclosures.
The site plan includes a drive-thru canopy near the entrance between the two buildings. It is
designed with the similar tile roof treatment to match the buildings. The design as proposed
incorporates a 100-foot space between the towers that helps preserve a view to the water. The
proposed amenities include tennis courts, pools, and spa.
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. The landscape plan has been revised and exceeds the requirements of
Code. This includes a mixture of various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals.
The Residential Infill Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
midpoint of the peak/eave of the main pitched roof The HDR District permits up to 130 feet for
sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown District (to which the site will be
rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for
174 feet which includes 164 feet from the mean elevation to the top of the living units, plus ten
feet of mechanical area (representing the midpoint of the main pitched roof structure).
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre (150 dwelling units).
The applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating the portion of the road
Page 4
.
.
just north of Georgia Street, in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. That portion will be conveyed to
the owners of the Belvedere Apartments. The southern third of the road between Jones and
Georgia Streets will be realigned and through movement will be maintained. A portion of the
subject property will be dedicated to the City as right-of-way for the realignment of the road.
Final lane alignments and widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor along Georgia Street shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to
meet current engineering standards.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units 150 dwelling Yes
units units (50 du/ac - units (45
Peri he Plan du/ac
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
Page 5
-----.
e
B. FLEXmILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 145,055 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.33 acres
with right-of-
way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 174 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue - 3 feet
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 10
minimum feet; North
(Georgia Street
- 15 feet)
PARKING 1.25 space/unit 15 spaces 190 spaces Yes
SPACES (188 spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.665 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The Residential Infill Project use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
c. FLEXmILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CBD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
proj ect height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 174 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
Page 6
.
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Infill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
Page 7
H.
"
The City retained an architect to review the proposed design changes that were introduced
at the May 16,2000 CDB meeting. The City's consulting architect has worked with staff
and the applicant's architect to modify the roof treatment and the east elevation design.
The proposal, as amended, is well articulated with unified elevations (especially east and
west) and coordinated architectural elements.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
Page 8
.
-"
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a 100-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The site plan and elevations have been amended to include a request for 174 feet in total height
for the two towers. The Planning Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet.
It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks will be required pursuant
to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not constitute approval of the
docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following conditions:
1) That Osceola Avenue right -of-way be maintained north of Jones Street, adj acent to
300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere apartments);
2) That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission and
relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised application to be
submitted);
3) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation;
Page 9
--
--
4) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
5) That the building permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the CDB;
6) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
7) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
8) That conditions 1-4 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Georgia Street. Final confirmation of the utility locations may
require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The
Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to resolve this issue prior to
review of the vacation request by the City Commission.
,
) ,--
.... Ii
.. '"-y
Prepared by: Lisa L. Fierce: {}:.:;!
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
\IMS2\PDS\Planning Department\C D BlC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola Condos\Osceola 400 STAFF
REPORT final. doc
Page 10
.
.water, 20 May 2000
ORIGlNALfILE COpy
To:
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services Director
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748 - Clearwater FL 33758 - 4748
, .~\ ~~-_...-: i'~--~'~: :'
:J \ l~~~iJ L_;
iHi: 7 2000 Ii ,
I /._-'"
I I
I PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
i SERVICES
! CITY OF CLEARWATER
From:
Joe Pereira
500 N. Osceola Ave # 804
Clearwater, Fl33755
Notice of Public hearing eDD 00-11/ FL 00-01-03 - Notice of Objection
As an interested party in public hearing CDB OOl-IIIFL 00-01-03 I object to all 3 requests
by Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
This project is too big, too high, too close to the water and too dense in comparison with
the neighborhood around it.
It is also too close to our building and specially the south side apartments will lose much in
quality of life and also value.
Such a tall building destroys the aesthetics and "look and feel" of downtown
Clearwater.
The reason Paris is such a beautiful city is that (besides the Eiffel Tower and Montparnasse
Tower) all buildings are not taller than 7 floors.
The same is true for Washington DC.
Clearwater is an underbuilt city and there is enough space to develop so downtown doesn't
need a pocket of such high density and tall buildings that would destroy the harmony of the
neighborhood.
Anything more than half the projected number of units would be too big for the area.
Clearwater is not New York and we do not want it to become anything like it.
1. Increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft
AI The planned 15-story high-rise will obstruct the view of all South Apartments in
Osceola 500 plus take a lot of light and sun away from those apartments (sunshine only
until 11 am).
B/ It will also cause that our swimming pool facing west will be in the shade in the
morning at least in high season, which is winter.
To:
.
o [E~[~~]W[E ,or
"16. Ui
May 13, 2000
...
Mfl,~ FJtgJ~."""
Planning and Development Services
Director
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater FL 33758 - 4748
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
From:
Carl Roehrig
500 N. Osceola Ave Apt 802
Clearwater, Fl33755
Notice of Objection
Re: Notice of Public hearing CDB 00-11 / FL 00-01-03
As an interested party in public hearing CDB OOl-II/FL 00-01-03 I object to all 3 requests
by Osceola Bay Development, LLC for the following reasons:
This project is too big, too high, too close to the water and too close to my bay windows!
Such a tall building destroys the aesthetics and "look and feel" of downtown
Clearwater.
The reason Paris is such a beautiful city is that (besides the Eiffel Tower and Montparnasse
Tower) all buildings are not taller than 7 floors.
The same is true for Washington DC.
Clearwater is an underbuilt city and there is enough space to develop so downtown doesn't
need a pocket of such high density and tall buildings that would destroy the harmony of the
neighborhood.
Anything more than half the projected number of units would be too big for the area - half
the units built lower wouldn't destroy the character of the neighborhood.
Clearwater is not New York and we do not want it to become anything like it.
1. Increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft
AI The planned I5-story high-rise will obstruct the view of all South Apartments in
Osceola 500 plus take a lot of light and sun away from those apartments (sunshine only
until 11 am).
B/ It will also cause that our swimming pool facing west will be in the shade in the
morning at least in high season, which is winter.
Au
f[ {))- () I-o?:>
r
.
.
To: Lisa Fierce
Planning and pevelopment Services Director
City of Clearw~ter
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758
May 6, 2000
From: Hubert Heller
300 North Osceola Avenue 2-C
Clearwater, FL 33755
i
o ~~~~W~ D~
II 9. '
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Notice of Objection
Re: Public hearing CDS 00-11/ FL 00-01-03
I am an interested party in public hearing CDB 001-1 FL OO-Ol-O;\.~d I
object to the requests by Osceola Bay Development, OC for the follo~~g
reasons:
The proposed buildings do not fit into the character of downtown
Clearwater. What makes Clearwater special is the absence of very tall
high-rises and we want to keep it that way. There is plenty of space and it
is not really necessary to build so high and to increase the population
density. A visit to the high-rises in Sand Key or downtown Tampa
illustrates the point. Such a building would totally change the pleasant
and friendly character of downtown Clearwater.
1. Increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft
Any building higher than 100 ft would stick out like a "sore thumb". I
object to any increase in height above 100 ft.
2. Increase in density
As mentioned above, this is unnecessary and would be incongruous with
the friendly and relaxed way-of-life in Clearwater. I would not like for
Clearwater to become like Manhattan. I object to an increase in density.
3. Vacation of North Osceola Ave right-of-way from Jones Street to Georgia
Street
N. Fort Harrison Ave (Alt US 19) is a very busy street and we use N
Osceola Ave to go for walks and bike rides (Alt US 19 is not really safe)
and to bypass the traffic and therefore I object to the proposal to shut it
down.
Thank you for listening to my viewpoint on this matter.
~-+(Q(k-r---
t=t Le
flr [b --0 I-(j 7
.
.
"'"' I.
r( cd
c5/ll/fD
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater FL 33758-4748
Re. Notice of Public Hearing before the COB on 16 May 2000,
in the case of OSCEOLA BAY INC;etal.
Case No. COB OO-ll-FL 00-01-03
I am an owner in residence at Harbor Bluffs Waterfront Condo.
I also own the residence located at 511 N. Osceola Avenue.
I have lived at HBWC for 22 years.
Over the years, I have been waiting for the day someone would
come along and improve the neighborhood...That day has arrived!
I live on the Southwest corner at the HBWC. The View is always
the highlight of our lives. The thought of having a neighbor to
the South does not bother me, as I always knew that some day we
would find that somone would surely build a beautiful edifice in
that pristene location.
Now may I address some salient matters concerning the plans for
The Osceola Bay Club:
Buildinq Height..It would have been nice if it only went to 10
fIOors, but I doubt that the builders would have been able to.. re-
cover a reasonable amount for their investment if held to ten.
Vacation of Osceola Avenue...Osceola avenue is our onlv qood source
of ingress and egress here at HBWC. Without that arterial ?ur condo
would be hedged-in here at 500 Osceola, with no where to go.
Vacating a small amount for the continuation and re-alignment of
Osceola is a viable alternative to losing this valuable road!!!1
Lose of View.... Some of my neighbors are worried that they will be
losing most of their waterviews because of a highrise blocking out
the scene. Most of the units on the South side of the condo ~
have a limited waterview now and will maintain most of the view
they now have. The only thing some of them will lose is a cityscape
in the new scene. But that is progress and we are caught-up in the
sweeping changes brought on by a growing city,this we should not
deny !! 1 ! !
~
LtCol USMC Retired
500 N.Osceola unit #305
Clearwater FL 33755
FILE COpy
MvJtj /0) '11)0 l)
f~ (JO-(l-()?
r-n
.
.
FYI
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REVISED NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
May 16, 2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
1. (cont from 3/21/00) Osceola Bav Inc 1 Osceola Bav Ltd 1 Green Corner me 1 Morrishillmc 1 Osceola ProP
Ine 1 Sunset Properties Inc 1 Carisa M. Marion 1 Gulfview Restaurant Inc 1 Zeus Inn me 1 Anthonios
Markopulos (Osceola Bay Development, LLC.) are requesting a flexible development approval of a Residential
Infill Redevelopment Project with 1) an increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft; 2) an increase in density from 30
dwelling units per acre to 44.2 dwelling units per acre (total 150 units); and 3) the partial vacation and relocation
of Osceola Ave. resulting in the realignment of Osceola Ave. immediately north of Jones St. (Osceola Ave. to
remain open to northbound through traffic) at 400 Jones St., Sec 09-29-15, M&B's 43.04, 43.05, &43.06; Lutz,
Clovis C. Sub, Lots A & B; Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, BIk 2, Lots 1-2; and Cate's, A.B. & Jennie Sub, Lots 8-11
& subm. land. CDB 00-11 1 FL 00-01-03
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning and Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to
appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record
of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute
286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for
review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater,
Planning and Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COpy OF TillS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON
WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRlNG REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN TillS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEm
REOUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 05/06/00
rILE COpy
F"'. ·
,I .
~ '-".. -
._~
4
e
e
ACTION AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
June 20, 2000
Meeting called to order at 1 :00 p.m. at City Hall
ACTION - Planner W. Ryan Givens approved as expert witness.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION
ACTION - David Frisbie, of de Guardiola/Renaissance, presented Master Plan for
Downtown redevelopment.
ITEM A - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE/RECONSIDERATION
Item #A 1 - 18524 US 19N (Parslev Baldwin)
ACTION - Continued to July 18, 2000.
ITEM B - CONTINUED ITEMS
Item #B1 - Cont'd from 05/16/00
LLC - Owner/Applicant, Kenneth H. Roush - Representative. Request Flexible
Development approval of a Residentiallnfill Project to: 1) increase height to 174
feet; 2) increase density to 45 dwelling units per acre; 3) permit 6-foot fence within
front setback along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street; and 4)
partially vacate and relocate Osceola Avenue right-of-way between Jones Street
and Georgia Street. Sec 09-29-15, M&B's 43.04,43.05, & 43.06; Lutz, Clovis C.
Sub, Lots A & B; Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, Blk 2, Lots 1-2; and Cate's, A.B. &
Jennie Sub, Lots 8-11 & submerged land
ACTION - APPROVED requested vacation of Osceola A venue right-of-way. 6-0
AND
ACTION - APPROVED Flexible Development for Residentiallnfill Redevelopment
Project: subject to conditions: 1) City Commission approve vacation of Osceola
Avenue right-of way & applicant construct road relocation, as shown on site plan,
with revised application to be submitted; 2) height of buildings not to exceed 164
feet from mean elevation to the top of the living units, and not to exceed 174 feet
to the midpoint of the peak roof enclosing the mechanical units; 3 applicable open
space & recreation land fees be paid; 4) building permit application reflect design
submitted to and/or modified by CDB (Community Development Board; 5) project
install sidewalks along west side of Osceola Avenue and on Georgia Street, for
pedestrian access to Clearwater Harbor; 6) project improve Georgia Street to meet
current engineering standards; and 7) applicant meet conditions 1 - 3, to staff
satisfaction, prior to issuance of Development Order. 6-0
mcd0600
1
06/20/00
j
1
e
e
ITEM C - LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS - None.
ITEM D - LEVEL 2 APPLICATIONS
Item #D1 - 711 Bav Avenue: John & Patricia Slauqhter - Owner/Applicant, Request
Flexible Development approval of a Residential Infill Project to reduce the east side
setback from 5 feet to 1.5 feet, and increase the height of a masonry wall within
the front setback from 3 to 6 feet to install a wood trellis, arbor, and 6-foot
masonry wall. Lot 21, plus west 35 feet of Lot 19 , Corrected map of Harbor Oaks.
FL 00-04-12
ACTION - APPROVED 6:0
Item #D2 - 904 Drew Street: Vine Place, LLC - Owner/Applicant. Request Flexible
Development approval, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and
Comprehensive Landscape Program, to reduce: 1) Parcel II A II : a) west side setback
from 20 feet to 15 feet. b) north side setback from 20 feet to 15 feet; c) front
setback on Drew Street from 25 feet to 18 feet; and d) front setback on Vine
Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet and 2) Parcel liB ": a) east side setback from 20
feet to 10 feet; b) north side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet; c) front setback on
Drew Street from 25 feet to 13 feet; and d) front setback on Vine Avenue from 25
feet to 10 feet to construct an 8,000 square-foot office building. FL 00-04-13
ACTION - APPROVED with the condition that signage comply with the Code. 6:0
Item D3 - 1426 McMullen-Booth Road: La Caiia:la Holdinq Co./James Rapp for
Sunset Mercantile Ltd. Partnership - Owner/Applicant. Request Flexible
Development Flexible Development approval to reduce the north side setback from
15 feet to 5 feet and increase the height of fencing from 6 feet to 10 feet, as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with a Comprehensive Sign
Program for use as a 11 5,000 square foot self-storage facility.
Parcel Number: 09-28-16-02988-000-0011 - FL 00-04-14
ACTION - APPROVED with condition that attached signage be limited to 48 square
feet. 6:0
ITEM E - APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 16,2000
ACTION - APPROVED
ITEM F - DIRECTOR'S ITEMS
For quarterly presentation, staff now groups amendments according to pending land
use, rezoning, and annexation cases. Continued cases will not be considered for
three months.
mcd0600
2
06/20/00
.
e
e
900 Pennsvlvania Avenue and 901 Enqman Street - Clearwater Neiqhborhood
Housinq Services - Request time extension
ACTION - APPROVED six-month extension. 6:0.
Chair Fiqurski will not attend July 18, 2000 meeting.
Member Mazur disclosed that he had spoken to the Osceola Bay applicant regarding
code requirements after the May 16, 2000.
Majority of board recommended staff reserve spaces in City Hall parking lot for
members during meetings.
Commission deferred action on minimum rental periods until July but did approve
95% of Code amendments. New copies of Community Development Code to be
distributed.
All board action requires minimum of 4 votes.
July 18, 2000 meeting date previously affirmed to applicants. Rezoning related to
Las Brisas project to be presented that day. Site plan to be presented on August
15, 2000.
ACTION - Member Gildersleeve to serve as Acting Chair on July 18,2000. 6:0
ITEM G - ADJOURNMENT - 3:05 p.m.
mcd0600
3
06/20/00
'Ii
.
.
,.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
June 20, 2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
Item A - (cont from 5/16/(0) Osceola Bay Inc / Osceola Bay Lid / Green Corner Inc / Morrishill Inc / Osceola
Prop Inc / Sunset Properties me / Carisa M. Marion / Gulfview Restaurant me / Zeus Inn me / Anthonios
Markopulos (Osceola Bay Development, LLC.) are requesting a flexible development approval of a Residential
Infill Redevelopment Project with 1) an increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft; 2) an increase in density from 30
dwelling units per acre to 44.2 dwelling units per acre (total 150 units); and 3) the partial vacation and relocation
of Osceola Ave. resulting in the realignment of Osceola Ave. immediately north of Jones S1. (Osceola Ave. to
remain open to northbound through traffic) at 400 Jones St., Sec 09-29-15, M&B's 43.04, 43.05, &43.06; Lutz,
Clovis C. Sub, Lots A & B; Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, Blk 2, Lots 1-2; and Cate's, A.B. & Jennie Sub, Lots 8-11
& subm. land. CDB 00-11 / FL 00-01-03
Item B - (cont from 5/16/00) Harold S. Wilson, TRE / Irene E. Datlow / Parsley Baldwin Realty are
requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 135 spaces to 40
spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at 18524 U.S. 19 N., Sec 19-29-16, M&B's 44.04 &
44.05. CDB 00-14 / FL 00-03-09
1. John E. & Patricia R. Slaughter, Jr. are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the required
side setback from 5 ft to 1.5 ft, and increase the height of a masonry wall within the front setback from 3 ft to 6 ft,
as part of a Residential Infill Project at 711 Bay Ave., Harbor Oaks, Lot 21 and W 35 ft of Lot 19. CDB 00-16 /
FL 00-04-12
2. Vine Place, LLC are requesting a flexible development approval, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program, to reduce the following: a) Lots 22 & 23 Drew Park - 1) Side
(west) setback from 20 ft to 8.66 ft; 2) Side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft; 3) Front (Drew St) setback from 25
ft to 18 ft; and 4) Front (Vine St) setback from 25 ft to 9 ft AND b) Lots 1-3 Park Plaza - 1) Side (east) setback
from 20 ft to 10 ft; 2) Side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft; 3) Front (Drew St) setback from 25 ft to 13 ft; and
4) Front (Vine St) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft at 904 Drew St., Drew Park, Lots 22 & 23 less St, and Park Plaza,
Lots 1-3 less S1. CDB 00-17 / FL 00-04-13
3. La Canada Holdin2 Company (Sunset Mercantile Limited Partnership) are requesting a flexible development
approval to reduce the required side setback along the north property line from 15 ft to 5 ft and increase the height
of perimeter fencing from 6 ft to 10 ft at 1426 McMullen Booth Rd., H. H. Baskin's Replat, Pt TR 1 & unsub.
Land on S. CDB 00-18 / FL 00-04-14
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning and Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to
appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record
of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute
286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for
review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater,
Planning and Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
...
.
.
,
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON
WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR
REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 06/03/00
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF
CITY COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold a public hearing on
Thursday, June 1, 2000, beginning at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be
heard, in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the vacation of:
1. A portion of the irregular 40 ft right-of-way of N. Osceola Avenue lying between Jones
Street and Georgia Street. (Osceola Bay Development, LLC) V 00-06
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or
objection with the City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any
decision made by the City Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings,
will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence
upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Fl 33758-4748
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE
City Clerk
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN
PROPERTY ABUTTING THE PROPOSED V ACA TION.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK
DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE
ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD
CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 05/18/00 & OS/25/00
~
1'-29-00; 5: 14PM;CITY CLERK DEPT.
;727 562 4086
# 2/ 4
~
.
e
e
)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING - ACTION AGENDA
MAY 16, 2000
ITEM A - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES/RECONSIDERATION - None.
ITEM B - CONTINUED ITEMS
Location: 3.24 acres on the east and west sides of Osceola Avenue,
etween Georgia Street and Jones Street. Zoning: HDR, High Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible development approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project with
an increase in height from 30 to 179 feet; increase in density to 45 dwelling units per
acre; and the partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right~of~way from Jones
Street to ~posed Use: 150 attached dwellings and within two 179-foot
towers. ~
ACTION:
Continued to the June 20, 2000, meeting.
ITEM C - LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS
0)
Item C1 - Sunset Point Road and Soule Road. Owner: Benevolent Protective Order of
Elks of the USA, Clearwater Lodae #1525. ADDlicant: Cornerstone Communities. Inc.
ReDresentative: Keith Zayac. P.E.. Post. Bucklev. Schuh & Jerniqan. Location: 0.99
acres approximately 300 feet to the northwest of the intersection of Sunset Point Road
and Soule Road. Request: 1) Land Use Plan Amendment from Institutional to
Residential/Office Limited; and 2) rezoning from I, Institutional District to 0, Office District.
Case lUZ 00-03-03
ACTION:
Approved.
Item C2 - HelistoDs Request: Amendment to the Community Development Code to
permit helistops in the LOR, Low Density Residential District, as a Flexible Development
application. Case: Text Amendment TA 00-04-01
ACTION:
Denied.
Itern C3 - 1721 Coachman Plaza Drive. Owner/ADDlicant: Superstar Tire Store of
Clearwater, Inc. Location: 0.66 acres on the east side of Coachman Plaza Drive, 250 feet
north of SR 590. Request: 1) Annexation of 0.66 acres to the CitY; 2) Land use Plan
Amendment from Residential/Office Retail (County) to Residential/Office/retail (Clearwater);
and 3) rezoning from CP-2, Commercial Parkway District (County) to C, Commercial
District (Clearwater). Case ANX 00-03-07
ACTION:
Approved.
Mcd0500.ag
1
!1~::]"-~"t~f1f~ -O-\~T'~l]}
,'.:' "Q ,r-'~-, ,u; ~"
:I r. )1
,'/! i III ' i :>(:1:L ~I
:: I ! t j " ",. ',},r''.,
f '~j,l:'~,\J, !-,rgl1&4Q~", vt;,_,) IvlENT,SVCS
; ___.w,..__e; ,r:y~g~_,C1f:':\1WAIER
ITEM 0 - LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS
)
j
~
.'\
.)
)
11-29-00; 5:14PM;CITY CLERK DEPT.
;727 562 4086
# 3/ 4
..
e
e
Item 01 - 1717/1721 Coachman Plaza Drive. Owner/Applicant: Russel Burr. Location:
1.15 acres on the east side of Coachman Plaza Drive, 250 feet north of SR590. Zoning:
C, Commercial District (pending annexation). Request: Flexible Development approval to
terminate the status of nonconformity. Proposed Use: Existing vehicle repair shop. Case
FL 00-01-02.
ACTION:
Approved.
Item 02 - 18524 US19 North. Owner: Brad Baldwin. Applicant: Parsley Baldwin Realtv.
Reoresentative: Brvan L. Zarlenaa. Location: 3.11 acres on the west side of US19 North
and the south side of Nursery Road. Zoning: C, Commercial District and 0, Office District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the required number of parking spaces
from 135 to 40 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Proposed Use:
A 71,250 square foot mini-storage development. Case FL 00-03-09
ACTION:
Continued to June 20, 2000, meeting.
Item 03 - 860 Harbor Island. Owner/Applicant: Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. Representative:
Gerhard Boerner. Location: 0.25 acres on the west side of Harbor Island, approximately
3,000 feet north of Harbor Passage. Zoning; LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential
District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the required rear yard from 25
to 21 feet for a waterfront lot as a Residential Infill Project. Proposed Use: An existing
single-family house with a bedroom/study addition. Case FI 00-03-10.
ACTION:
Approved.
ITEM 3 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: April 18, 2000
ACTION:
Approved.
ITEM F - DIRECTOR'S ITEMS
Item F1 - Ordinance No 6548~OO - Schedule of Application Fees, Rates, and Charges.
Request: An amendment to the schedule of fees, rates, and charges for level One, level
Two, and Level Three applications.
ACTION: Approved with the following changes: 1) the prevailing party in an
appeal case would not pay costs; 2) Flexible Standard - Single FamilylTwo Family
Development fees be changed to $200; and 3) Flexible Development Single/Two Family
Development fees remain at $450.
Item F2 - Uodate of annexation, land use plan amendment. and rezoning cases.
Ms. Hardin referred to an updated sheet of annexations, land use plan amendments. and
rezoning cases prepared by staff. She said staff will group plan amendments six times a
year beginning in July 2000 in order to improve their review and to send them to the PPC
and CPA.
Mcd0500.ag
.,fn),r~~.JffjJl'.-,a><,.',w-"v""', ~-~f))J
~n~, ~ I
i I II Ii:, "
d IIJi ,.".. ,
l.J j , ,'.. " j
i . ~ . I
, ','" - ""-""-, " M S
: t'lJ.l,NNIhi':; !r'jPI;:--<~r-~=---J- m-l..
if ~ ~~~,~> t--,\t: ;;~ ~L \)~~ljrEi\iT If\.Q,
..'-,cc'=' c., < ,. , I h Lli'. \"l.'.-R S\ vV
. ,,' ~,",,- .,..':' '".;;:::'::.._"~~\i~-,-E .
05/16/00
11-29-00; 5;14PM;CITY CLERK DEPT.
e
;727 562 4086
# 4/ 4
.
e
\
I
Item F3 - CountYwide Plan Evaluation
Larry Pflueger, Principal Planner with Pinel/as Planning Council (ppe) said the PPC is
undertaking an update of the Countywide Plan and is seeking input from aI/ Pinellas County
local governments. It was suggested the County focus on becoming more redeve'opment~
friendly. It was remarked there is insufficient higher density residential USes in certain
areas of the County. It was commented the best direction for a planning council may be to
focus On issues and develop macro solutions as opposed to a regulatory framework for
Countywide zoning. Mr. Pflueger said he has received feedback from various
neighborhood groups indicating they do not prefer higher density units. He said the
County is focusing on redevelopment. He said one concern is jf mobile home parKS are
viable land uses for the future. In response to a question, Mr. Pflueger said he is unsure
what can be done about enclaves.
Other Business
Discussion ensued regarding the Board's position regarding the downtown
redevelopment plan. Staff will invite the deGuardiola team to the next meeting.
It was suggested that staff develop a checklist to ensure that all required elements
of an application is submitted to the Planning Department staff prior to bringing cases
before the CDs. Ms. Fierce said staff provides applicants a checklist at the front counter.
"")
ITEM G - ADJOURNMENl- 4:49 p.m.
111of~:~'~n~LErn'l
. ,..,.~."...~.
"Un], ',' c" '" 1'1..1 n I
I I L I ", ., '..uUU U I
j ~. .
; PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS
'-==-=<?l1X9L9lEARWATER
)
Mcd0500.ag
3
05/16/00
..
ATY OF CLEARWATER ..
PLA~ING AND DEVELOPMEW'r &
MUNINCIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER,FL 33758-4748
PHONE(727)562-4567 FAX(727)562-4576
FAcsIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
0!St/{ [::j'efCv
c;fr 01 OIJ
FAX NUMBER: 1R-q7&0 TOTAL NO, OF PAGES ?
INCLUDING COVER: '
TO:
Anne 1)~ roo (
FROM:
COMPANY:
DATE:
PHONE NUMBER:
NOTES/COMMENTS:
o Per your request 0 For review 0 Please comment 0 Please Recycle 0 Urgent
ONE CITY,ONE FUTURE.
11
.T Y 0 F C LEA R W ATE R
PLAN. ING AND DEVELOPM&
MUNINCIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER,FL 33758-4748
PHONE(727)562-4567 FAX(727)562-4576
il~ (f
~~~\-
tl ().: ~ rr
tr-
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO:
~~\~
COMPANY:
DA TE:
o Per your request 0 For review 0 Please comment 0 Please Recycle 0 Urgent
ONE CITY.ONE FUTURE.
e
f"-
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER" FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727)562-4576
TO:
v~\\ hDU~~
1.\~\~ - <6CJ3\o
C1.. ~.D (>. ~~ ~ a "" I: (L
-c:;-~.()O
FAX:
FROM:
DATE:
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
.
\.
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER" FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727)562-4576
:=g . --
l (' h \ j\~ O_~_O_
pr... <60)4 - J 4('7 ~ 4{o( - Q{e:}"l. fl;/ /..J(09~f%ro,
(j. j.-IJO_ '--4 v^~-
S. <\. 00-
TO:
FAX:
FROM:
DATE:
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
I
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: May 16. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: B 1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Kenneth H. Roush
LOCATION:
400 Jones Street
REQUESTS:
. Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 179 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dwelling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and
. Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan and site survey submitted by Northside
Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 3.39 acres (including right-of-way proposed to be vacated)
3.24 acres (without right-of-way)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast corner
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
East Portion ofthe Site: 150 feet by 155 feet.:!::
West Portion of the Site:522 feet by 320 feet.:!::
Page 1
.
.
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vlclmty IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.39 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
· Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
· Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
· Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
Page 2
e
.
. Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification rather than to the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category of
CBD.
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
When combining the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current High Density
Residential zoning district, the site characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff
believes that the site is appropriate for high-rise residential development. In determining the
appropriate density for the site, the staff was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the
Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future density in the City should be located downtown where
land and infrastructure are available. Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical
component of an economically healthy full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central
Business District is 70 units per acre in approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the
remaining center section from Myrtle Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units
per acre. The transition from the City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density
proposed by the Osceola Bay Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be
appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
Page 3
e
.
areas will be rezoned to the Downtown zoning district. When evaluating the dimensional
standards applicable to the Osceola Bay Club proposal, the Planning Staff was guided by a
combination of the HDR and Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within two towers. The plan includes a central domed entrance that
connects the towers. The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color
stucco, terracotta color clay roof tile, and smoke blue windows. Two levels of underground
parking will be provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated
entrance/exit. Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking
garage.
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. The landscape plan as submitted will need to be further refined and
detailed to meet the requirements of Code. This includes perimeter landscaping within a minimum
width of 10 feet.
The Residential Infill Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
midpoint of the peak/eave of pitched roof The HDR District permits up to 130 feet for sites
which front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown District (to which the site will be rezoned)
permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for 179 feet.
The design as proposed incorporates a 100-foot space between the towers that helps preserve a
view to the water.
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating seven feet of the
northern two-thirds of the road, between Georgia and Jones Streets, and the realignment of the
southern third of the road. Through movement will be maintained. The proposal also includes
the striping of a left-turn lane on Jones Street to Osceola Avenue. Final lane alignments and
widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater Harbor along Georgia Street
shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to meet current engineering
standards.
Currently, Osceola Avenue provides access to the Belvedere Apartments at 300 Osceola Avenue.
The applicant's proposal suggests that access be maintained through an easement. The vacation
of the road, however, should not include the portion in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. It should
remain public right-of-way with removal of asphalt north of the Belvedere curb cut. This
eliminates the need for the easement as suggested.
Page 4
.
.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units 150 dwelling Yes
units units (50 du/ac - units (45
Peri he Plan du/ac
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
B. FLEXmILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 147,502 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.39acres with
right-of-way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 179 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue - 1 foot
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 5 feet;
minimum North (Georgia
Street - 10
feet)
PARKING 1 space/unit (150 15 spaces 203 spaces Yes
SPACES spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.654 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The ResIdential Infill use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
Page 5
.
.
C. FLEXffiILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CBD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
project height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 179 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Inlill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Inlill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Inlill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
Page 6
e
.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Infill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements will significantly improve the site. The City will benefit by having an
attractive building complex located in a redeveloping area.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
Page 7
.
.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a 100-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The current site plan requests 179 feet in total height for the two towers. The Planning
Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet and recommends a revision of the
project to this height. It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks
Page 8
.
.
will be required pursuant to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not
constitute approval of the docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following conditions:
1) That Osceola Avenue right-of-way be maintained north of Jones Street, adjacent to
300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere apartments);
2) That the balance of the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City
Commission and relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised
application to be submitted);
3) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation;
4) That the landscape plan be further refined and detailed to meet the requirements of
Code, including a minimum lO-foot buffer along all street frontages, prior to the
issuance of any permits;
5) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
6) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor;
7) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
8) That conditions 1-5 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Belvedere apartments to Georgia Avenue. Final confirmation of
the utility locations may require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola
Avenue right-of-way. The Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to
resolve this issue prior to review of the vacation requesfbY the City Commission.
'(~'
\j/~
Prepared by: Mark T. Parry and Lisa L. Fierce: i(l 7- !
( \~--/
ATTACHMENTS: "-_./
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
IIMS2\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D B\C D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 STAFF
REPORT jinal.doc
Page 9
.
-.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
REVISED NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
May 16, 2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
1. (cont from 3/21/00) Osceola Bav Ine / Osceola Bay Ltd / Green Corner Ine / Morrishill Ine / Osceola Prop
Ine / Sunset Prooerties Ine / Carisa M. Marion / Gulfview Restaurant Ine / Zeus Inn Ine / Anthonios ,_.
Markooulos (Osceola Bay Development, LLC.) are requesting a flexible development approval of a Residential
Infill Redevelopment Project with 1) an increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft; 2) an increase in density from 30
dwelling units per acre to 44.2 dwelling units per acre (total 150 units); and 3) the partial vacation and relocation
of Osceola Ave. resulting in the realignment of Osceola Ave. immediately north of Jones St. (Osceola Ave. to
remain open to northbound through traffic) at 400 Jones St., Sec 09-29-15, M&B's 43.04, 43.05, &43.06; Lutz,
Clovis C. Sub, Lots A & B; Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, BIk 2, Lots 1-2; and Cate's, A.B. & Jennie Sub, Lots 8-11
& subm. land. CDB 00-11 / FL 00-01-03
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning and Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to
appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record
of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute
286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for
review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater,
Planning and Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF TIllS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON
WITH A DISABILITY REOUlRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODA nON IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN TillS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR
REOUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 05/06/00
..,
..., "
. ... "','
OSceo\o.. e:o, 'txvClCf?me.J J LLC.
\00 {\erc.e sf-. I ~ Ho,
C\Cb.ruXA.:hT) fL. 337Q5
~'f m'l \a.()'j
I~:l~ YOIttlCO"\ Po'lf\+ ~I.
~J FL' 3~55
~~r)~~ H. Roush r:6.
201..\- s. ~~& ~.
()Etu'"~ J f""L 33 7~
c..DB ro-II CDB 6- fro -ci)
158 (..0) R--, & F)
SALVATION ARMY
PO BOX 8070
CLEARWATER FL
33758 8070
MORRISHILL INC
PO BOX 960
ST PETERSBURG FL
33731 0960
/'
GREEN CORNER INC
535 CENTRAL AVE
ST PETERSBURG FL
33701 3703
/
OSCEOLA BAY LTD
308 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3900
/'
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
FLAG SERVICE ORG INC
503 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4007
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3904
BELVEDERE APTS OF CLW INC
300 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3946
SHALLIMAR REALTY INV INC
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 1 B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3916
RASCHIDI. FARHAD
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 1 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
8ETES, GONZALO
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 2-8
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3916
...
.
.. '. ,. ..;......-,
HELLER. HUBERT A
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 2 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3916
HEINEY. MICHAEL
411 CLEVELANO ST ~ 133
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4004
GAIMAN, SHEILA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 3 A
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
BAUMAN, MARY L
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 3 B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
.
lOJELAR, MLADEN
lDJELAR, MIRJANA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 3 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
PEENS, LOUIS
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
SOUKHARER, ANDREI
LOMBARDI, SILVIA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 4 A
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
lWERS, JAMES
lWERS, KATHRIN
400 N BETTY LANE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4706
SAAVEDRA, ELENA B
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 4-C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
KATlSCHMANN, ULRICH
POSTFACH 13 03
74873 SINSHEIM
I:{%ERHANY
KEYSTONE INVESTMENTS
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6 B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
lIMMER, MICHAEL S
C/O MGL COMMERCIAL
13400 BISHOP'S LANE ~100
BROOKFIELD WI
53005 6237
SCHNEIDERGRUBER, MANUELA
CHESTERWELL INV LTD
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 5 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917.
TMENTS
AVE ~ 6 B
ECHEVERRIA, MILDRED
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6-A
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
PEENS, LOUIS
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
DOBIN, BART
DOBIN, EMMA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3919
DOBIN,
00 I
30
CL
33
AVE ~ 6 0
RALL. ARTHUR F
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 7-F
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3919
WILSON, JERRY J
DE POOLE. ANN J
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 7 E
CLEARWATER FL
33755 ~919
jj ? F
F:Cl~,;r;. courn t'FY rl
e(k) ~,.! O~;l[ ell (, (,V[
(.I.E(.1F~hlnT[h' fel
~~ .:1 7 ~) r) :'~l 8 2:, 8
OKUHOYE. Jlll.u T U::; ()
Of<.UHOYF. f-i 1 CHA[l 0
(.( WI r.J (1'1 r ,)I () i'i\if'
C:l h':jI~(,\I(,1 f'~ F L
PICCONE. ISEU (i
F' I C:C Ot~ E~. F H / 0
((,1 N [1':;( 'f 'II Ii (\if
U [nr~hl(n EI~ f l
~/, ~~ '/ {:" C~I >, n '/, H
-~ .~, '/ ", c, ?, ;~~\ ~,::, C,)
,e.
BET
30
AP
CL
33
JENKINS, JOSEPHINE F
600 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3819
OSCEOL~ PROP INC
PO BOX 960
ST PETERSBURG FL
33731 0960
GANG~OFF DAVID J
405 ARRISON AVE
CLEA FL
3375 3 04
HENR~ATRICK
HENR A
1165 ALE
SEMI L
33772 7019
D
C
AVE
DIAKOS, PETER J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~102
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3931
MISCAVIGE, LORETTA A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 104
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3931
BARTON, GEOFFREY J TRE
BARTON, DONNA L TRE
18880 CARRIGER RD
SONOMA CA
95476 6246
CARLSON, WILLIAM M
CARLSON, LINDA L
650 HOWE AVE STE 1000
SACRAMENTO CA
95825 4726
AITKEN, DEBORA K
AITKEN, DAVID N
14846 DELBARTON
HOUSTON TX
77083 5641
,;:O'y', WAl_ iRAUT M
,cj J II i !J H f, [', [(
t~!lh' r H flUF::CJfo:,; Tl.
( , (1 " , 1;:' '1::, ;> t,
TURBESING. HORST
GERLACH-TURBES1NG. K
son t,~ n;CF IX i'1 {WE It /,()r.c1
C' l [ (d' I,,) (, T [ r < r 1
>"') : Ftjl ') L't ? "~"->'I /1
e,.. "
.....' ...,." ......'
CLEARWATER INV INC
516 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3905
SALVATION ARMY
PO BOX 8070
CLEARWATER FL
33758 8070
./
SUNSET PROPERTIES INC
PO BOX 960
ST PETERSBURG FL
33731 0960
,,;
HENRY, PATRICK D
HENRY, CYNTHIA C
11653 PINEDALE AVE
SEMINOLE FL
33772 7019
HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT
CONDO ASSN INC
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3947
FARHAT, MARY K TRE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 103
CLEARWATER FL
33755
STRIJEWSKI, HERMANN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 105
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3931
DORSETT, KENDALL L
CHAIT, ISADORE M
3749 AGUILAR ST
LOS ANGELES CA
90065 3810
ANDRUS, BRIAN
ANDRUS, DONNA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 109
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3931
BRAUNING, ELISABETH
EICHTALWEG 3A
PO 1201
82229 SEEFELD
GERMANY
NIL.I'<Ci,u'".'\l"": I Ll~., W~"1h.i'\L".. '--
t'! ] f h: f r.! Ii n [,; T E r!. J n r ! J C [
',00 N CI::,(T ill (1 {i Vt. I;?()'~,
C L E (', r...:!,oJ ('1 T f R F 1
:,,:S 7 S5 :'>'),3~1
RYE;(iCf<,. DAt'-! I EL
RYBACK. DOR1S A
?70 SUiRI ETT FW ,1')J:
I Uh', Jj,! 11.1 ur~ hU~ .1".1
, ,
" I,. ,'\ I
...
BURKE, KEVIN J TRE
BRJDGEPOINT TRUST 1/7/00
206 S BRAND BLVO STE 200
GLEt~DALE CA
91204
.
. ..... f .. , , ...., .: ~. . ....' ,',. .. ..: : . . , ".~ " ~.
ROCKL. RAYHOND G
ROCKL. HILARIE J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 207
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3934
FISCHLER, 100
FISCHLER, DAPHNA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 208
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
HALEVY. BINIAHIN
HALEVY. SARA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 209
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
HORSHE~D, JOHN W
C C BOX 99-071
JOHANNESBURG 2000
,"'SOUTH AFRICA
SONDERHANN, WILFRIED
SONDERHANN, HELGARD
52 ACACIA ST
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1405
SOLONINA, VICTORIA
702 SNUG ISL
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1831
BUCERIUS, HEIMO
SPERLING, CHRISTOPHER
EDUARD-PFEIFFER-STR 31
70192 STUTTGART
'GERHA.w
MEISOL, MILDRED L
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 303
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
KRECKEL, PATRICK F
KRECKEL, ELINOR M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 304
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
BENO, JOSEPH P
BENO, AGNES L
500 N OSCEOLA
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3936
TRE
TRE
AVE ~ 305
REICHARD, GLORIA E
RTE 1 BOX 116A
BARNEY GA
31625 9602
PEREIRA, JOE X
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 307
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3936
WHEATON, MARJORIE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 308
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3936
CARTER, ROBERT E
CARTER, JUDITH M
1060 CONTINENTALS WAY
APT 411
BELMONT CA
94()()? ?; 1 r:, 7
SAWTELLE, GREG F TRE
SAWTELLE, KAREN R TRE
957 VERDUGO CIRCLE DR
GLENDALE CA
91206 1535
MC KERNAN, MARY C
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 310
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3936
KUNHARDT, MARIA 0
C/O THE CPA ACCOUNT
365 CR 39A UNIT 16
SOUTHAMPTON NY
11968 5243
ARENA, NANCY
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 402
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
BIXBY, BARBARA M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 403
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
VIDS8N ROBERTA L
1 ?i,iJ l (~f.F V ] t V.,J h'l) tJ ?,j C,
,'., ; I.... ,-".. h: t I', ..Jt~
(;, ('1 U f~ D :~; C F 0 I. (.l (1 V [ tl ,1 (I r,
C l. [ (~ f< hi (~ T E h~ F l.
elf i'lf.2\hyr [h~ f'L
."~'-I >' L.,(,
=',::. =l So:) ;)937
GLEASON. FRANK R
GLEASON. SUSANNE W
:) on I'~ C1~::CF Cll. A (:) 'IE It <1 Uc,
Cl r ',"" i ! f~' r l
SAWTELLE. GREG TRE
SAWTELLE. YAREN TRE
S()O N OSCT nu~ AVE jj ~,ns
C l t. (if\~\)(.\1 F h' F: l
~~~ ~~'J "/ ~:1 t:, >~ <~ ~.:~ /
.':';~) '? S '-:-, ~~I '-.) c1 ?
.
CUNNINGHAM, SHERRI L
RAMP, LENIN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 408
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
.
- .
PERRY, ROGER B
PERRY, WILMA J
PO BOX 2
ALEXANDRIA MN
56308 0002
'\. " .
MAINATI, GEORGE A
HAINATI, SARAH A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 410
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3932
CONRADI, ELKE TRUST
MEHLER, HORST TRUST
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 411
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3932
VALKO,. JAMES
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 501
CLEARWATER FL
33755
GIBSON, ROBERT W
GIBSON, GENEVIEVE
15776 CEDAR RIDGE RD
EDEN PRAIRIE MN
55347 2337
BUSWEILER, JOHN T
BUSWEILER, CATHERINE E
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 503
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3938
ROESCH, HANS K
ROESCH, MARIA T
48 CASTLEDENE CIR
AGINCOURT ON MIT ISl
't.~~
FEELEY, WILLIAM M
FERREIRA, SHERRI L
931 MC CUE AVE
SAN CARLOS CA
94070 2524
DAVIS, EDWARD A
DAVIS, PEGGY J
1206 HONAN DR
SOUTH BEND IN
46614 2172
ROWE, GEORGE F
ROWE, MARGARET M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 507
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3938
MERWIN, GAlUS WIll
MERWIN, EUGENIA
75 MOUNT TOM RD
NEW ROCHELLE NY
10805 1216
POWLEY, CHARLES N
POWLEY, VIRGINIA J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 509
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3939
BEAN, MARJORIE E
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 510
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3939
HEALY, WILLIAM P
HEALY, BARBARA J
390 E CIRCLE DR
NEW LENOX IL
60451 9761
URIZARBARRENA, MIKEL
FRIAS, BERTA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 601
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3939
BYRNES, LAWRENCE F
BYRNES, JESSICA
52 MARTEL RD
CHICHESTER NH
03234 6407
MILLER, BRETT S
MILLER, JILL H
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 603
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3939
BYRNES, LAWRENCE F
BYRNES, JESSICA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 604
CLEARWATER FL
33755
~~~RNES' LAWRE~~E
50 SOLA AVE
CL FL
33 5 940
~ 605
..... ",~>'.!ES ~ p:::>.,;;,-)\~ A
ZAUN, h~.,-v., j
EmF] 1 L. 1 ~~r~, :'~(jl!C)Y
C, F J ~~ f: L (~n ;:; T E [(; c; TR :) 0
~~.U()l_l i'llliJCHft'l ')()
C,n (, ~.' ll~:;CF: Cil (1 (;\iF II (" ,(It,
CI fnh' 1',-r[F~ r'l.
.~:, -'!) ~? I:,. ~- :~;~J \) ,<} (',1
l... ,!. I
ERIKSEN. VIVIAN S
ERIKSEN. ROCHELLE K
PO ["OX 8,17
()Cti"I t \/ ] :1 (, CO
~3.1 J '1. I (In ,1/
HRABELSKI. DOROTHY
500 N OSCEOLA AVE II 609
C'Ui~f~(i,!nTEP FL
, .', .~ /1 -.,' :') c) .~~, () ".1 ()
.
GROPE, MICHAEL J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3940
~ 610
.
NEUWIRTH. ROBERT E
2153 ELKHURST DR
PLANO TX
75023 1612
ECKSTEIN, UDO
1509 BONAIR ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755
LEESLEY, LINDA
552 PRARIE PSE
DAKOTA DUNES SO
57049
SETTLE. BRUCE J
SETTLE, ELIZABETH J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 704
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3941
OSTERTAG, MARTIN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 705
CLEARWATER FL
33755
ECCLES, CHET RIll
ECCLES. INGRID L
PO BOX 490
APPLEGATE CA
95703 0490
LOTTER, ROBERT A
SVINOS. JOHN
1106 ALTA VISTA DR
FULLERTON CA
92835 4027
COCAIN, MAXINE B
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 708
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3941
WADDELL, DAVID E
WADDELL, GWEN S
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 709
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3941
KING, MICHAEL
KING, TIMOTHY J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 710
CLEARWATER FL
33755
MESCHOULAM, SAMUEL
FUENTE DE CASTRO
TECAMACHALCO
5390 MEXICO CITY
~ICO -.' .
ROEHRIG, CARL W
C/O ROEHRIG, SABINE TRE
500 OSCEOLA AVE ~ 802
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
JAMES. MILTON C
JAMES, ROSE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 803
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
PEREIRA, XOSE
500 N OSCEOLA
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
AVE .~ 804
KREINER, JOEL
FISHER, JAMES
500 N OSCEOLA
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
TRE
Q TRE
AVE ~ 805
WONG. PATRICK Y
WONG, LINDA
10 SOUTHDO\iJN CT
HILLSBOROUGH CA
94010 7242
WILLNER, NEIL A
WILLNER. EVE K
1928 RIMCREST OR
GLENDALE CA
91207
CULLODEN, CHARLES A
CULLODEN, SALLY B
2000 BEL AIRE OR
GLENDALE CA
91201 1127
MADERO, MARIA R
GONZALEZ, LIDIA M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 809
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3933
C(~ ""'-r-;.""
cn', {i. r'~HI~ J C J (, l
" '1 I I.) H fi f, C; f: h' C I
(': ( [,' i;[ i [ r~1 I I C f-'!
BOLGER. 1::-._<-.-.. iut\ tl
~,()U r'~ (Y',CF DL (, {:VT Ii ,:.1]
CI.. [nf',j(,\I(~ T [' r~ F L
r";; ~-) ;~~ -? J
:::, ~":, }~) ::;. :"S S,I .3 ,~,
.JU~~:>FN. CRAlC-i C TRE
,JF:N':';U..!. ::X-'lU. Y F< TRE
~21S MEsn VISTA DR
i (\( f' - (~.~.~ ,t', ~"l (; (- (:
HOPP. DAGMAR lRE
f;;[ AN~(FFn 7. F<OL F Tr-.(E
C/O h'OI.I'ltlD pr'fit. 1 Y
.ll r! f (If,1 f Ii:! i,,' J ' ,I Ji! ,i
CI f flf;'hlf~ OJ r h' f I
"1"1 I
", -~, c, r:, ..:) ('I I /,
VIANNA. MANUEL F
VIANNA. KATIA F
34 REGENT ST
CAM8RIDGE MA
02140 2112
.
MESH8ESHE' RONALD I
HESHBESHER. BETSY F
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 0
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3932
NEUMAN, DOUGLASS A
NEUMAN. REBECCA R
4240 HIGHWAY 99 S
ASHLAND OR
97520 9046
BAYBAK, MICHAEL
UNIT 305
4515 OCEAN VIEW BLVD
LA CANADA. CA
TILLES, RON
TILLES: KIM
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ PHG
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3947
MORSE. DAVID G TRE
HORSE, CAROL L TRE
61 REICH RD
WOODSTOCK CT
06281
BATTAGLINI, ADRIANO
406 VENETIAN DR
CLEARWATER FL
33755 1750
GILBOA, YARIV
GILBOA. RONIT
288 SPOTTIS WOODE CT
CLEARWATER FL
33756 5268
HOCALAR. NACI
CAIAZZA, TERESA G
504 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3905
BASKIN. HAMDEN HIlI
BASKIN, ROBYN
516 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3905
WHITEHURST. LEON JR
clo BASKIN, HAMDEN HIlI
720 SNUG ISLAND
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1831
BENO, JOSEPH P
BENO, AGNES L
500 N OSCEOLA
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3936
TRE
TRE
AVE ~ 305
BERLE, RONALD
BERLE, PEGGY A
131 LEEWARD IS
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2304
BURNISON, JACK
409 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3904
BURNISON, JACK
BURNISON, PENNY E
409 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3904
JACK
P Y E
RISON AVE
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405 NevpISON
CLEAR
33755 0
AVE
AVE
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405~R RISON
CLEA E L
337 0
AVE
GANGF! HOFF CAV!",:-f\. J
40., S . ',..' .~. (. JF..\'~~ HH~':'l' I5f'N
:.. t, F~ () f\.'.ly~J - f"ll)
, , ,t t /, ') 'I')
,',,', ,,',,' '.. '1 /
AVF
~
AVI':
Gi-"lNl1[l.~r F" Dr I [) J
<i. o. r) N tt/~'. .1 t In SOr~ AVE
Cl. h"lf~\, C :r~ F n
~.~; ~~! 7 ~l ~~I '0 ;'1 ()
CHURCH SCIENTOLOGY
RELIGIOUS TRUSl
so:~, CLEVELArm 3T
eLf (\ r,' '-'! (\ T E r~ F I
3~; i' t,:1 c)
CHURCH OF SCIENTO~Y
FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION IN
503 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4007
MARION, CARISA H
1325 ARBOR AVE
LOS ALTOS CA
94024 5332
/'
ZEUS INN INC
100 CO~ONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
/'
CITIZENS COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS OF CLEARWATER
305 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3923
CATANZARO. GEORGE J
CATA~~ A H
540 N S
CLEA T F
33755 4150
GAN~ELHOFF' D VID J
405 R A RISON AVE
CLE E
337 3
GANGELHOFF. DAVID J
40~H RRISON
CLE FL
33 5 4
AVE
SALAM, JAMI AL INC
225 N FT HARRISON AYE
CLEARWATER FL
33755
OSCEOLA BAY INC
308 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3900
/
OUEST INN INC
509 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3906
SHALLIMAR REALTY
INVES rilENT INC
:-';UU (.! Dc)(T III (; II ~)C
L E- (\ f ( ~I,I ('; T [ r.' F L
~):s 7 :) S .~~, r;'.1 "/
CLE{~r~(IJn 1 E G' .
F"O f)()X '47<1~)
CLEJ~P ^. '. R FL
.,t; ,17 4:-\
GULFVIE~ESTAURANT
100'CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
INC
.;'I
MARKOPOULOS, ANTONIOS
100 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
/"
ANTONIS, HARK INN INC
100 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
CATANZARO, GEORGE J
CATANZARO, SHERRA M
540 JONES ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4150
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3904
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405 ~SON
CLEA E F
3375 0
AVE
BOMSTEIN, ALAN C
BURNSIDE, ROBERT J
620 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4108
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
FLAG~ANIZATION IN
503 AN
CLEA E L
33755 4007
OSCEOLA BAY INC
30~ AYE
CL A E L
33
SIDDIOI, ARLENE S
507 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3906
CLFARWATEP ...... .....i ')c
e/u HRNOL [J- ','1'1''-1 PRUP
n T'1 (.!: eel F f~~:. iif\i.!Ul U h'f. ?~L f :::
.1:>.1 CI~.CE Ol () (: Vf
e ,. ?~h'vHlr F Fi FL
Ll~; 7 C,. L, d() -/."~
C-ookl'e.. b\ I reo. 4-\,
\lU, SGnse+ Dr.
e \c:-c <, v \...J,-~ e I-I F L ?;-:,lSS
."
'"
.
.
Christopher Sperling
500 N Osceola Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33755, USA
FonIFax (727) 447-6034
Lisa Fierce ~
Planing and Develcfment Service
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
~:.;., " , . ....dl
,:.~~~ "~ I . I..<"-i~
.,.,' i, t., ~
" ~....
Clearwater 12.04.00
Public hearing COB 00-11/FL 00-01-03
-~
Dear Mrs Fierce,
because I can not attend the public hearing in person and so can't appeal per Florida
Statute 286.0105, I write to you in great concern about this proposed Building.
So here is my notiCe of Objection.
As an interested party in the public hearing regarding CDB001-11/FLOO-01-031 objekt to
the 3 requests by Osceola Bay Development, LLC for the following reasons:
1. Increase in height from 30ft to 179 ft
a) the planned Building is to close to our Building so it will obstruct the view especily of
the Units facing east/south. They have only one window with a little view to the water.
After the new Building is there like proposed there will be no view left at all and no
more sunlight.
b) It also will take away the Sun from the Swimmmingpool, for anyone who can only go
there in the morning till noon there will be only shadow from the new Building.
c) The exit of the garage of this planed Building will be in front of my window. So facing
this and thinking about cars of approximatly 130 Units drive in front of my window
every day with alt the exhaust fumes and noise makes me sick already. Not to speak
of my 4 little kids. I don't want to make them sick of pollution.
d) All this points affect in a big way the value of the Condo lawn and not only reducing
it's value but maybe much more the quality of living here.
2.1ncrease in density
a) An increased density brings more people in this up to now quiet area. This is not
necesary and just increases the polution, trafic and noise (and maybe crime).
b) So the existing regulation (30 dwelling units per acre) had it's purpose and I think it
was just right that way and should stay like it this (same fore the heigh of 30ft).
s'
.
.
3. Vacation of N. Osceola Ave right-of-way from Jones St. to Georgia St.
a) The proposed shutting off of Osceola leaves only one access to the Ft. Harrison and
can only be accepted when a traficlight would be installed on Ft. Harrison/Georgia St.
b) The additional trafic of the proposed Building would enter into Georgia as well as our
own trafic. You hardly can access the Ft. Harrison so the Cars would build up and
stand all on Georgia St. back to the exits of the Buildings. This would be exactly in
front of my balcony and windows. I say no to this plan and will do everything to
change it.
sincCE
ii~
Chris pher Sperling
Owner of Unit 302
PLANN!NG & DEVELOPMENT
SERViCES
~ITY O~~LEARWAT~R
.
.
Fierce, Lisa
To:
Subject:
nesadmin@minespring.com
FW: osceola bay club case
please forward this to ken roush; ken, additionally i need an update to the residential infill criteria based on the site plan
changes (# of units, height, etc..)
thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Fierce, Lisa
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 9:58 AM
To: Parry, Mark; Hardin, Cyndi; Ruscher, Amy; Stone, Ralph
Cc: 'nestech@mindspring.com'
Subject: osceola bay club case
fyi:
i asked ken roush for 15 new sets of plans for this project (these need to be collated, staped, and folded). all sheets will
be amended based on the changes to the osceola avenue vacation request; the actual ROW vacation request will
change; need reduced plan for use at the meeting. i told him he may want to reconsider the proposed height of the
building - considering that we will only support 164 feet.
this information is due to us by close of business on monday, april17.
FILE
1
U3/~U/UU MUN 13:51 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
141 002
.
.
BrOkerage
Management
Investment
Development
Consulting
MLG COMMERCIAL
New Amflr;c. 'ntemstlon"
March 20, 2000
13400 Bishop's lane
Suite 100
Brookfield, WI 53005
Office; (262} 797-9400
Fax; (2621 797-8940 .
http;ftwww.mlgcommercial.com
Via Facsimile
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Offices in Appleton, Wisconsin
and Huntsville, Alabama
Re~ CDB 00-111FL 00-01-03; Request by Osceola Bay Development, LLC
for a Flexible Development Approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment
Dear Ms. Fierce:
I am writing this lener on behalf of Michael S. and C. Margene Zimmer regarding the
above referenced request. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer own a condominium unit in the
Belvedere Condominium development, which is located in the 300 block of North
Osceola Avenue. Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer wish to register their strong opposition to the
three components of Osceola Bay Development's request
First, an increase in height from 30 feet to 179 feet is totally unreasonable. Such a
dramatic height increase would block the view of many of the units in the Belvedere
development as well as the view for many others, Mr. and Mrs. Zimmer, and I am sure
many others, purchased their property with the reasonable expectation that an established
part of the city would not experience future dramatic change, particularly a six-fold
increase in neighboring height restrictions. Ibis change would only benefit the
requesting party at the great detriment of other owners and residents such as Mr. and Mrs.
Zimmer.
Second, the requested change in density is also unreasonable. Increasing density by one-
third guarantees increased congestion and traffic problems, again at the expense of
current residents and owners. This area of the City is already too congested, and to add to
that congestion by increasing the permitted density is contrary to sound public policy.
Also, it appears the increase in density would be at least partially the result of increasing
the height limit, which as I pointed out above is not fair to current residents.
COMMEH.Cl.Il.L REAL ES1:A'J'E S.tI:WICES WORLDWIDE.
INDIVIDUAL MEMBER OF
~
-.-.,. sKJ
(3/20/00 MON 13:52 FAX 262 797 8940
MLG COMMERCIAL
141 003
.
.
Finally. the Zimmers are also strongly opposed to vacating Osceola Avenue between
Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola is an important conidor through the City. To
simply eliminate a section of it under any circwnsrances would be poor planning, but to
do so when a developer is proposing to significantly increase congestion and density in
an already overcrowded area is outrageous
Moreover, Osceola Bay Development would seem to have no more right to use that
vacated street than other adjacent property owners, such as the Zimmers and other
residents of the Belvedere Development. Hence, if the street is vacated, which I believe
would be a terrible decision, then Osceola Bay Development should not gain exclusive
ownership of the vacated roadway - Belvedere Development could put to prOductive use
part of the vacated street.
[n summary, the requested changes would benefit only the developer to the great
detriment of the owners of nearby properties. For the foregoing reasons, the Zimmers
respectfully request that Osceola Bay Development's request be denied_
Thank. you.
tat
Paul 1. Hinkfuss
Assistant General Counsel
CC: Ann De Poole, Manager
Belvedere Homeowners Association
300 North Osceola A venue
Clearwater~ FL 33755
Members of the Community Development Board
\\oa \sys\data\invests\legal\pjh\:;;lmmcrlet,doc
~
"A
"\
.
.
Horst and Karin Tubbesing
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Director
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater FL 33758 -4748
re: Notice of Public hearing CDB 00-IIIFL 00-01-03
10. April 2000
-..
Notice of Objection
As an interested party in the public hearing regarding CDB 00 I-IIIFL 00-01-03
we object to all 3 requests by Osceola Bay Development, LLC for the following reasons:
l.Increase in hight from 30ft to 179 ft
1. the planned 15 storey highrise is too close to the water and will
obstruct the view of all South Appartements in Osceola 500 plus take a lot oflight
and sun away from those appartements.
2. It will also cause that our swimming pool facing west will be in the shade in the most
mornings of the year (to 1 pm).
3.' The planned exit to their parking garage will also be directly in front of the
appartements facing South in 500 No Osceola (as well as their trash storage). With 130
planned units this will be a lot of additional traffic, additional exhaust fumes and additional
noise (see also Sa).
4. Points 1 to 3 directly affect all South facing units in the 500 building, thus reducing
their value and the quality of living considerably.
2.Increase in density
see next point
FILE COpy
fL cD -Ql--O)
rice
.(/10
"
.
.
3.Vacation of North Osceola Ave right-of-way from Jones St. to Georgia St.
1. The proposed shutting off of Osceola between Jones and Georgia leaves Georgia as the
only access to 500 North Osceola, this is unacceptable because:
a) 130 units in the new developement plus 100 units in 500 Osecola exit through
Georgia onto N Fort Harrison. They need to turn either right or left there, IF there
is a gap in the busy traffic going North and South on Fort Harrison - this could cause
build ups in Georgia (which is very short) and even build ups in the planned
underground garage as well as the car park of N. Osecola 500, which means
'even more noise and more pollution for all South facing appartements of the 500
building.
b) additionally to the above we have Georgia as the only Entrance point (access) to the
500 Building plus all buildings and houses further north on N. Osceola. Which means
heavy traffic going both ways through a Georgia "Bottleneck".
c) Trying to access the 500 Building (and houses further north), the owners of500 N
Osceola (and other people wanting access to North Osceola) have to turn left into
Georgia. This is the ONLY access then to 500 N. Osceola. It can only be done IF there
is a gap in the traffic corning from the North.
As Fort Harrison is extremely busy, specially at peak times and on weekends, with
people going to the beaches, the cars wanting to turn left into Georgia will build up and
this will become a very dangerous spot - with accidents likely to occur.
At the same time people wanting to turn LEFT ONTO Ft. Harrison, corning out of
Georgia, have to wait for the same gap in traffic! !
\ . '
~ / /~~;--5--
Horst Tubbesing V
(;( - ~ . '"( l-c0k.' ^- \
Karin rlach- Tubbesmg 0
--,
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS TO BE CANCELLED
The following hearing scheduled to be held by the Community Development Board on Tuesday, March 21,
2000, is being continued:
Osceola Bay Inc / Osceola Bay Ltd / Green Corner Inc / Morrishill Inc / Osceola Prop Ine / Sunset
Properties Inc / Carisa M. Marion / Gulfview Restaurant {ne / Zeus Inn {ne / Anthonios Markopulos
(Osceola Bay Development, LLC.) are requesting a flexible development approval of a Residential Infill
Redevelopment Project with an 1) increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft; 2) increase in density from 30 dwelling
units per acre to 41.6 dwelling units per acre; and 3) the vacation of Osceola Ave. right-of-way from Jones S1. to
Georgia S1. at 400 Jones St., Sec 09-29-15, M&B's 43.04, 43.05, &43.06; Lutz, Clovis C. Sub, Lots A & B;
Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, Blk 2, Lots 1-2; and Cate's, A.B. & Jennie Sub, Lots 8-11 & subm. land. CDB 00-11
/ FL 00-01-03
The hearing will be rescheduled at a later date and notices sent to surrounding property owners.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Ad: 03/18/00
MAR-28-00 TUE 11:57 AM THOMPSON.FAMILY
.
3
.
..,......,.1" . 0 1
28 March 00
To: Ralph Stone
(or Lisa Fierce)
From: Carisa Marion
Dear Ralph,
Here is the notarized affidavit, finally! I've faxed it to the City Clerk's office and
hopefully they can still get the ad in the newspaper on time. Thank you so much, all of you, for
helping us along the way_ It is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Carisa Marion
--'-'
----==:-;::=-....
r;:::.~~n'M\~~ r n'.\
Ii 0 \~~lc,U~l'-~\ \ ..
\\r~\~;~?nM ,\
(y ~ ~.l
"Ir p, r;\-
Fll\l~NI.; ,., ,F ,:
Sf d'
-~, r "
c"'" 01 t,
F\LE.
...
MAR-28-00 TUE 11:57 AM THOMPSON.FAMILY 3
.; .___.,!!~14/~~ . l~" 7:i17S6N:576 C~ Ot'CI..EAa.T~ ~ 02
. AFFIDAVIT TO AVTBOIUZE AGENT
I"LANNUfG _ D'PDDfttDNT..~ ~"nON
~ MUl'fJaFtAL SDYIeIlI~. 10C) M)UIH MYa'IU ,,~. a-' PLOOI\
... ~~7 pl\JC.(m) ~...n, ___
P.02
aTAu. ~ ft..OItlOA
COUMW OF PJNIUAI
CC\r;~ l1a.riotJ
~..~-)
1. That (i amlWe are) the ~(') and ,..cord tide hOldM"(.) of 8M fCllOWil'lQ deactl~d pr~:
'1lOIlIA()IU~l",IW.\.OCI.TlQIoI, '3 l) 1_ n S(()~LAr ~\Le.
Cleo.lvJ~. .f:.Ldl{ A1 ,"3 3 7 S..\
.-..... ...~
2. TnAt thi. property constitutes tI'I. property for ~Ich . ~at for a:
~~.s, () Q ,.,rtbt-. rfRl) tl.l~eP()1f""l
~.. .,..l
3. That the undersigned (ha&n1avu) .ppolntel:f It'd (does/do) appoint -,
'K K. ~A/20 T~4A ~ OScUlA &4<.t D~cf'lf1c,,..rr.
.. U\1Ioh1f1 "-Ie) 10 ~.....,...,.. ..._..............."..-"~
~, That thi. affIdevlt hae be.l'I exeout.d to indl.Ict me City of cr.arwet.... FlOOCla to conaldflf' and act
on ttw ~. deac:ribed prQ~;
5. ~ (lIWe~. the ~ hereby ceriWy that tP\e fOl"egoln; i. true and corred.
~ TATI OP PlDItlDA. COUNTY Of PJNEUAI
IlQNcll (~o..n.) ~ to """ Ilefora ~ _ d'~ 01
A.D.. " to me JftOIor
wIIo II pe~
~l~o-)
by
.~"-~
.. tdtntIlIOI1lOft,
_ED 1"'-t0l0rMr')
StG~5~C~~
..."
~~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
SUBSCRtlE AND SWORN TO ME
~~~~~
NOTARY PUBLIC
r~"p''''''''''''''Q.oV''''.o')~'W;1
.... . SANDRA K. FARNHAM Q
~. COMM.1241871 "CI
NQ'tAA"f PUSUC. CALIFORNIA ...
SANTACtAAAOOUKlY ....
~ CotAm EllII<t9t ~v IS,2OO3 II!
~hJI'I'Al'N'-_
fO.d
d~~:EO oo-~~-~~W
Ruscher, Amy
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
.
.
Fierce, Lisa
Friday, March 17, 20004:05 PM
Chase, Susan
Ruscher, Amy; Stone, Ralph; Hardin, Cyndi
addition to notice list
could you please add two names to the list for notifying neighbors regarding osceola bay club?
cookie gilreath
1709 sunset drive
33755
1828 venetian point drive
33755
thank you.
1
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS TO BE CANCELLED
The following hearing scheduled to be held by the Community Development Board on Tuesday, March 21,
2000, is being continued:
Osceola Bay Inc / Osceola Bay Ltd / Green Corner Inc / Morrishill Inc / Osceola Prop Inc / Sunset
Properties Inc / Carisa M. Marion / Gulfview Restaurant Inc / Zeus Inn Inc / Anthonios Markopulos
(Osceola Bay Development, LLC.) are requesting a flexible development approval of a Residential Infill
Redevelopment Project with an 1) increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft; 2) increase in density from 30 dwelling
units per acre to 41.6 dwelling units per acre; and 3) the vacation of Osceola Ave. right-of-way from Jones St. to
Georgia St. at 400 Jones St., Sec 09-29-15, M&B's 43.04, 43.05, &43.06; Lutz, Clovis C. Sub, Lots A & B;
Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, Blk 2, Lots 1-2; and Cate's, A.B. & Jennie Sub, Lots 8-11 & subm. land. CDB 00-
11 / FL 00-01-03
The hearing will be rescheduled at a later date and notices sent to surrounding property owners.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Ad: 03/18/00
ttDD/Ol-1J3
()xuJ~ ~ CW?
FILE
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: March 21. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: D 4
This case has being continued to a later date. Notices have been sent to surrounding
property owners regarding this continuance. New notices will be sent to
surrounding property owners once it is rescheduled.
Fif'lll ~
" ..~-
'.. ..... "'.'~
L.~
Page 1
.
.
.
!<el\r!e#) f-.!. Roush P. E.
f'--br~s ~ Cr'C\1 neer I (\~ ~v" Ices
30,-\ s. ee(cr-.~.... Rd;.J
C\etA.ruxd-er-) PL- 33>7 <oS
De v el op'!"e . J LC
'\e.rc..e. s{-.) ~ ~ \0
~3/SS
SALVATION ARMY
PO BOX 8070
CLEARWATER FL
33758 8070
GREEN CORNER INC
535 CENTRAL AVE
ST PETERSBURG FL
33701 3703
/
QUEST INN INC
509 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3906
SHALLIMAR REALTY
INVESTMENT INC
300 N OSCEOLA ~ 5C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
CLEARWATER OF
PO BOX 48
CLE ATER FL
3 58 4748
. (
.
~D~ 00-11 C-DB 3-2\- em
Fl OO-O~-O,
15'1 610-, Q) ,P)
MORRISHILL INC
PO BOX 960
ST PETERSBURG FL
33731 0960
/'
OSCEOLA BAY LTD
308 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3900
/'
SIDDIQI. ARLENE S
507 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3906
CLEARWATER. CITY
C/O ARNOLD-BRO PROP
ATTN:COLLIE ARNOLD REAL ES
121 N 0 OLA AVE
CLE ATER FL
66 1:>5 400'1
r
.
.
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
FLAG SERVICE ORG INC
503 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4007
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3904
BELVEDERE APTS OF CLW INC
300 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3946
SHALLIMAR REALTY INV INC
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 1 B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 391.6
RASCHIDI, FARHAD
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 1. C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
BETES, GONZALO
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 2-B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 391.6
HELLER, HUBERT A
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 2 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3916
HEINEY, MICHAEL
41.1 CLEVELAND ST ~ 133
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4004
GAIMAN, SHEILA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 3 A
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
BAUMAN, MARY L
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 3 B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
ZDJELAR, MLADEN
ZDJELAR, MIRJANA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 3 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 391.8
PEENS, LOUIS
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
SOUKHARER, ANDREI
LOMBARDI, SILVIA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 4 A
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
ZWERS, JAMES
ZWERS, KATHRIN
400 N BETTY LANE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4706
SAAVEDRA, ELENA B
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 4-C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3918
KATZSCHMANN, ULRICH
POSTFACH 1.3 03
74873 SINSHEIM
GERMANY
KEYSTONE INVESTMENTS
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6 B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 391.7
ZIMMER, MICHAEL S
C/O MGL COMMERCIAL
13400 BISHOP'S LANE ~100
BROOKFIELD WI
53005 6237
SCHNEIDERGRUBER, MANUELA
CHESTERWELL INV LTD
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 5 C
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
K~ETO~I STMENTS
3 0 SC A AVE ~ 6 B
C - W FL
33 55 3917
ECHEVERRIA, MILDRED
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6-A
CLEAR(IJ{~ TER FL
33755 3917
PEENS, LOUIS
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 68
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3917
DOE~ IN, BART
DOB IN, EM~'lA
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 6 C
CLFAr\~~{:) TET~ F:L
33755 :S919
DO~. N '.' ~BAR. T
DO 'I , EM
30 S:- lA AVE ~ 6 D
ClE: R~\)ATE.r-< FL
:33755 :5919
PALL, ARTHUR F .
300 N OSCEOLA AVE 7-F
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3919
RAL~RTH R
300 E AVE
CLE T L
33755 3919
**' 7 F
OKUBOYE, JULIUS A
OKUBOYE, MICHAEL 0
600 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3838
BETES, GONZALO
300 N OSCEOLA AVE
APT 2B
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3916
JENKINS, JOSEPHINE F
600 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3819
OSCEOLA PROP INC
PO BOX 960
ST PETERSBURG FL
33731 0960
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3904
D
DIAKOS, PETER J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE **'102
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3931
MISCAVIGE, LORETTA A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE **' 104
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3931
BARTON, GEOFFREY J TRE
BARTON. DDNNA L TRE
18880 CARRIGER PD
SONOrlA CA
95476 62(lt.
CARLSON. WILLIAM M
CARLSON, LINDA L
650 HOWE AVE STE 1000
SACR{~MHnO CA
95825 4726
WILSON,~"i::"RRY J
DE POOL NN J
300 N OS -OLA AVE **' 7 E
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3919
ROSS. COURTNEY D
604 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3838
PICCONE, ISELLA
PICCONE. ENZO
601 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3839
CLEARWATER INV INC
516 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3905
SALVATION ARMY
PO BOX 8070
CLEARWATER FL
33758 8070
/
SUNSET PROPERTIES INC
PO BOX 960
ST PETERSBURG FL
33731 0960
/'
HENRY, PATRICK D
HENRY, CYNTHIA C
11653 PINEDALE AVE
SEMINOLE FL
33772 7019
HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT
CONDO ASSN INC
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3947
FARHAT, MARY K TRE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE **' 103
CLEARWATER FL
33755
STRIJEWSKI, HERMANN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE **' 105
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3931
DORSETT, KENDALL L
CHAIT. ISADORE M
3749 AGUILAR ST
L~OS '~~1r<~~~L_.[S CA
900(.5 3810
i~NDRUS. CF: I AN
(~~~DRUS. Dm~NA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 109
CLEARWATER FL
3:5755 3931
.
. ,
.
AITKEN, DEBORA K
AITKEN, DAVID N
14846 DELBARTON
HOUSTON TX
77083 5641
BRAUNING, ELISABETH
EICHTALWEG 3A
PO 1201
82229 SEEFELD
1l1InJ L U f1
KENNEDY, WALTRAUT M
4 JUNIPER OR
NORTH AURORA IL
60542 1525
NIERENGARTEN, WARREN B
NIERENGARTEN, JANICE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 203
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3934
TUBBESING, HORST
GERLACH-TUBBESING, K
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 204
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3934
RYBACK, DANIEL
RYBACK, DORIS A
270 SCARLETT RD 1312
TORONTO ON M6N 4X7
CANADA
BURKE, KEVIN J TRE
BRIDGEPOINT TRUST 1/7/00
206 S BRAND BLVD STE 200
GLENDALE CA
91204
ROCKL, RAYMOND G
ROCKL, HILARIE J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 207
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3934
FISCHLER, 100
FISCHLER, DAPHNA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 208
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
HALEVY, BINIAMIN
HALEVY, SARA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 209
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
MORSHEAD, JOHN W
C C BOX 99-071
JOHANNESBURG 2000
SOUTH AFRICA
SONDERMANN, WILFRIED
SONDERMANN, HELGARD
52 ACACIA ST
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1405
SOLONINA, VICTORIA
702 SNUG ISL
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1831
BUCERIUS, HEIMO
SPERLING, CHRISTOPHER
EDUARD-PFEIFFER-STR 31
70192 STUTTGART
GERMANY
MEISOL, MILDRED L
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 303
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
KRECKEL, PATRICK F
KRECKEL, ELINOR M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 304
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3935
BENO, JOSEPH P
BENO, AGNES L
500 N OSCEOLA
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3936
TRE
TRE
AVE ~ 305
REICHARD, GLORIA E
RTE 1 BOX 116A
BARNEY GA
31625 9602
PEREIRA, JOE X
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 307
CLEARWATER FL
. 3936
WHEATON, MARJORIE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 308
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3936
CARTER. ROBERT E
CARTER. JUDITH M
1060 CONTINENTALS
(WT ~11J
(ih':lY
MC KERNAN, MARV C
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 3J.0
CLEAm.IJ~':lTER FL
BEU10NT CA
'i4UlYl 5J.~ I
SAWTELLE. GREG F TRE
SAWTELLE. KAREN R TRE
957 VERDUGO CIRCLE DR
GLD~DAU U~
9L?06 1555
c;Lj{)02 - 3/.57
33755 :3936
KUNHARDT, MARIA D
C/O THE CPA ACCOUNT
365 CR 39A UNIT 16
SOUTHAr1PTOfj ~~V
1J 96i3 524::S
.
,.._c. ..." "
.
ARENA, NANCY
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 402
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
BIXBY, BARBARA M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 403
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
DAVIDSON, ROBERTA L
1280 LAKEVIEW RD ~315
CLEARWATER FL
33756
BURDETTE, HARRY M JR
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 405
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
GLEASON, FRANK R
GLEASON, SUSANNE W
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 406
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
SAWTELLE, GREG TRE
SAWTELLE, KAREN TRE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 805
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
CUNNINGHAM, SHERRI L
RAMP, LENIN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 408
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
PERRY, ROGER B
PERRY, WILMA J
PO BOX 2
ALEXANDRIA MN
56308 0002
MAINATI, GEORGE A
MAINATI, SARAH A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 410
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3932
CONRADI, ELKE TRUST
MEHLER, HORST TRUST
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 411
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3932
KEYSTONE INVESTMENTS INC
300 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3946
GIBSON, ROBERT W
GIBSON, GENEVIEVE
15776 CEDAR RIDGE RD
EDEN PRAIRIE MN
55347 2337
BUSWEILER, JOHN T
BUSWEILER, CATHERINE E
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 503
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3938
ROESCH, HANS K
ROESCH, MARIA T
48 CASTLEDENE CIR
AGINCOURT ON MIT 1Sl
CANADA
FEELEY, WILLIAM M
FERREIRA, SHERR I L
931 MC CUE AVE
SAN CARLOS CA
94070 2524
DAVIS, EDWARD A
DAVIS, PEGGY J
1206 HONAN DR
SOUTH BEND IN
46614 2172
ROWE, GEORGE F
ROWE, MARGARET M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 507
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3938
MERWIN, GAlUS WIll
MERWIN, EUGENIA
75 MOUNT TOM RD
NEW ROCHELLE NY
10805 1216
POWLEY, CHARLES N
POWLEY, VIRGINIA J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 509
CLEARWATER FL
33755 ::::>)39
BEAN, MARJORIE E
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 510
CLEARWATER FL
33755 2"939
HEALY. WILLIAM P
HEALY. BARBARA J
390 E CIRCLE DR
f,J,EW LD~OX I L
60451 9761
lJRIl{~RB~~RG~[r~A. riJf<'EL
Ff-\1{~S. BERTA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 601
CLEPiml)ATER FL
33755 3939
BYRNES, LAWRENCE F
BYm~E~3, JESS I C{-1
52 t'iARTEL RD
CH I CHESTER r~H
0323'1 6407
M I LL,Eh~ ~ BRE" Tl S
t'iIL_LER. JIl_l_ H
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 603
CL E{~r::':~I!A TER FL
3:57E)5 :59:5'"
",
.
. . ~ 0" .._ "
.
BYRNES. LAWRENCE F
BYRNES, JESSICA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 604
CLEARWATER FL
33755
~ 605
JONES, PENNY A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 606
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3940
ZAUN, HELGA
BREITLING, SANDY
GEISELGASTEIG STR 30
8000 MUNCHEN 90
GERMANY
ERIKSEN, VIVIAN S
ERIKSEN, ROCHELLE K
PO BOX 847
MONTE VISTA CO
81144 0847
HRABELSKI, DOROTHY
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 609
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3940
GROPE. MICHAEL J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 610
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3940
NEUWIRTH, ROBERT E
2153 ELKHURST DR
PLANO TX
75023 1612
ECKSTEIN, UDO
1509 BONAIR ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755
LEESLEY, LINDA
552 PRARIE PSE
DAKOTA DUNES SO
57049
SETTLE, BRUCE J
SETTLE, ELIZABETH J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 704
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3941
OSTERTAG, MARTIN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 705
CLEARWATER FL
33755
ECCLES. CHET RIll
ECCLES. INGRID L
PO BOX 490
APPLEGATE CA
95703 0490
LOTTER, ROBERT A
SVINOS, JOHN
1106 ALTA VISTA DR
FULLERTON CA
92835 4027
COCAIN, MAXINE B
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 708
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3941
WADDELL, DAVID E
WADDELL, GWEN S
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 709
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3941
KING, MICHAEL
KING, TIMOTHY J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 710
CLEARWATER FL
33755
MESCHOULAM. SAMUEL
FUENTE DE CASTRO
TECAMACHALCO
5390 MEXICO CITY
",HEXlCO
ROEHRIG. CARL W
CIO ROEHRIG, SABINE TRE
500 OSCEOLA AVE ~ 802
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
JAMES, MILTON C
JAl'lES. ROSE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 803
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
PEREIR{~. XOSE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 804
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3942
KREINER. JOEL_
FISHER. Jf-ir'lE~~
500 1'~ OSCEOL_A
CLEAr~~\}ATER fCL
33755 =5942
TRE
Q TRE:
{WE ~ 805
WONG. PATRICK Y
i,I.IOr~G. L J t~DA
10 SOUTHDOWN CT
HJLLSBOROUGH CA
94010 7242
WILU~ER. NEIL A
1,0111 LLNER. EVE K.
1928 RIMCREST DR
GLEt~D(iLE CA
91207
.
, " -~. ..-- .'
.
CULLODEN, CHARLES A
CULLODEN, SALLY B
2000 BEL AIRE OR
GLENDALE CA
91201 1127
MADERO, MARIA R
GONZALEZ, LIDIA M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 809
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3933
COTA, JEFFERY 0
COTA, PATRICIA L
3410 HARGER CT
SACRAMENTO CA
95821
BOLGER, ELEANOR H
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 811
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3933
JENSEN, CRAIG C
JENSEN, SALLY R
4245 MESA VISTA
LA CANADA CA
91011
TRE
TRE
OR
HOPP, DAGMAR TRE
BLANKERTZ, ROLF TRE
C/O ROLAND REALTY
41 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33755 -t.fo/~
66/::'::' 4U1.0
MESHBESHER, RONALD I
MESHBESHER, BETSY F
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 0
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3932
VIANNA, MANUEL F
VIANNA, KATIA F
34 REGENT ST
CAMBRIDGE MA
02140 2112
NEUMAN, DOUGLASS A
NEUMAN, REBECCA R
4240 HIGHWAY 99 S
ASHLAND OR
97520 9046
BAYBAK, MICHAEL
UNIT 305
4515 OCEAN VIEW BLVD
LA CANADA, CA
TILLES, RON
TILLES, KIM
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ PHG
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3947
MORSE, DAVID G TRE
MORSE, CAROL L TRE
61 REICH RD
WOODSTOCK CT
06281
BATTAGLINI, ADRIANO
406 VENETIAN OR
CLEARWATER FL
33755 1750
GILBOA, YARIV
GILBOA, RONIT
288 SPOTTIS WOODE CT
CLEARWATER FL
33756 5268
HOCALAR, NACI
CAIAZZA, TERESA G
504 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3905
BASKIN, HAMDEN HIlI
BASKIN, ROBYN
516 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3905
~i~OA:r ~~
28 ' ~~~WOODE CT
CL ARWATER FL
33756 5268
WHITEHURST, LEON JR
C/O BASKIN, HAMDEN HIlI
720 SNUG ISLAND
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1831
BENO, JOSEPH P
BEt"O, AGNES L
500 N OSCEOLA
CLEAR~I}ATER FL
3375S-:t;,-:"\,.
TRE
TRE
AVE It 305
BERLE, RONALD
SERLE, PEGGY A
131 LEEWARD IS
CLEARWATER FL
"'? -~7 (, 7 2304
Hl)M~t.,! ISDN" J ('{Cr<.
409 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEAF;:hl(~TER FL
~337 5::' ;,904
E~UF~NISOH, .JACK
BURNISON, PEHNY E
409 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLE?{m\!ATER FL
33755 3904
BUR ~ISON "ll~J .'
8Ult:t" SON, '.~J.t'N E
<:o~\\ N ~dt;:'~l{';RR I SON {WE
l,:L.[fiP6~1 Tt -\ 'L.
3~,755 :5904
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
405 N FORT HARRISOH AVE
CL.EARliJATER FL
::'>3755 :S904
.
. ,
.
VID J
RISON AVE
3904
GANGELHOFF, VID J
405 RISON AVE
CLEA
3375
GANG
405 AVE
CLE
337
GANGELHOFF, DAVID J
40~RRISON AVE
CL FL
33 04
GAN~IO J
405 N TISON AVE
CLE T L
33755 3904
CHURCH SCIENTOLOGY
RELIGIOUS TRUST
503 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755
GULFVIEW RESTAURANT INC /
100 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION IN
503 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4007
MARION, CARISA M
1325 ARBOR AVE
LOS ALTOS CA
94024 5332
/
MARKOPOULOS, ANTONIOS ~
100 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
ZEUS INN INC
100 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
/'
ANTONIS, MARK INN INC
100 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2404
CITIZENS COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS OF CLEARWATER
305 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL .
33755 3923
CATANZARO, GEORGE J
CATANZARO, SHERRA M
540 JONES ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4150
CATANZARO, GEORGE J
CATANZARO, SHERRA M
540 JONES ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4150
GANGE
405
CLEA
3375
ID J
ISON AVE
GANG~EFF' D D J
405 F ISON
CLEAR E .
33755 3904
AVE
GANG
405
CLEA
3375
AVE
GANG'
405
CLEA
3375
ID J
ISON AVE
BOMSTEIN, ALAN C
BURNSIDE, ROBERT J
620 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4108
SALAM. JAMI AL INC
225 N FT HARRISON AVE
CLEAm,J{HER FL
33755
OG\'
""., '~I lA T I m~ I t,j
OSCEOLA B{W I NC
308 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLE~~lR\IUHER FL_
;:,37::,':;, 3900
/
AVE
~ vf) M PLw1to
~) ~ ~~ (}fL.
6t1f1 ~ ~tt1Ytr
~ ;W
! 0D dPG
L ~C() ~ it1fI
\
.---
?~
------,------~-~-.
.4
-
.
.
CITY OF CLEAR\YATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELO~~" BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of CleaT'\\a~r. Rorida. will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
March 21,2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the roUowillg requests:
1. Ascot Land Development Corporation (Paradise Adult :"'i\ing Services, Inc.) are requesting a flexible
development approval to permit an assisted living facility. as .1 Residential Infill Project, on a site that does not
front on a major, arterial street at 2155 Montclair Rd.. 5eI:. 0:-29-15. ~f&B 14.01. CDB 00-08 / FL 00-02-06
2. Robert C. YounwYoun2's Funeral Home is requ~ting a ~~cubk development approval of an expansion of
an existing funeral home (Retail Sales and Senicel in an Offi.::~ District with: 1) a reduction in the front setback
from 25 ft to 8 ft (Ewing St.); 2) reduction in the from setba.::,- from 25 ft to 11 ft (Greenwood Ave.); and 3)
reduction in the front setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (Howard 5(.1. as pan of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program at 1005 Howard St.. Belmom Sub 2nd Addition, Blk F, Lots 1-
7 & pt of Lot 8. CDB 00-09 / FL 00-01-04
3. J. Wayne & Brid2et M. Phillips are requesting a tktibk dc...dopmem approval of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, with a reduction in front setback from 2.5 it to 5 ft (Juniper St.) at 970 Eldorado Ave.,
Mandalay Sub, Blk 61, Lot 8 & riparian rights. CDB 00-10' f1. 00-02-07
4. Osceola Bay IDc / Osceola Bay Ltd / Green Corner Ine ~forrishill IDe / Osceola Prop IDe / Sunset
Properties Inc / Carisa M. Marion / Gulr,;ew Restaurant Inc / Zeus Inn Inc / Anthonios Markopulos
(Osceola Bay Development, LLC.) are requ~ting a tlex.ib:~ ~lopmem approval of a Residential Infill
Redevelopment Project with an 1) increase in height from 30 it [()~ ft; 2) increase in density from 30 dwelling
units per acre to 41.6 dwelling units per acre: and 31 the \acati,:r: o. Osceola Ave. right-of-way from Jones St. to
Georgia St. at 400 Jones St., Sec 09-29-15. ~f&B's 43.o.t. 4:')5. &43.06; Lutz, Clovis C. Sub, Lots A & B;
Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, Blk 2, Lots 1-2; and Cate's. A.a. & knnie Sub. Lots 8-11 & subm. land. CDB 00-
11 / FL 00-01-03
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or f.:~ .... nrren notice of approval or objection with the
Planning and Development Services Director or Cit)' Clerk pr:.:r (Q the hearings. Any person who decides to
appeal any decision made by the Board, with re:'pCCt to an:- ::::::.1::er considered at such hearings, will need a
record of the proceedings and, for such purpose. lIUy no:d {(\ e:::'~e that a verbatim record of the proceedings is
made, which record includes the testimony and eviden..:e up: r: .... hich the appeal is to be based per Florida
Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items \\ ill be 5\\ om ill.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff repons and recommenda::o!lS on the above requests will be available for
review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and ~:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater,
Planning and Development Services Departmem. 100 S. ~fynle :he.. Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/ AAE
City Clerk
City of CleaT'\\ a:=r
P.O. Box 4"748. CleaT'\\ater. F1. 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the bea:-:::g.
Norlhsille
&~ SewUu 11tt,
.
CIVil-
lAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAl-
TRANSPORTATION -
February 15, 2000
Attention:
Mr. Mark Parry
Ms Lisa Fierce
.,'.'1..0'" ..E~~~~(lJ~ D....
I !) i'_'~~-~ _~i~_ 'Y!j Tf;; .
I I '
,f' ".. .
;U 1; -'6. .J II
I
- I
i
,
I
I
City of Clearwater
Planning & Development Services Administration
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference:
Osceola Bay Club Project
Case FL 00-01-03
~~~~ElOPMENT
~~
--@F@l~_
Subject:
Transmittal of Additional Information
Dear Mr. Parry and Ms Fierce:
Transmitted with this letter are the following:
13 Each
1 Each
2 Each
Site/Civil Sheets C1.1, C3.1, C5.1, L1.1, Parking Levels 1 and 2
Schematic Section
Copies of "No Objection" Letters Re: Osceola Ave Vacation
A brief explanation follows that addresses the comments received by fax from Ms Fierce.
The same numbering is used in this response.
1. The slope of Georgia Street has been indicated to be less than 12%, as
requested by the Fire Department. This indication is made on Sheet C3.1.
When the grading plans are prepared, the actual slope will be calculated and
indicated.
2. A second Siamese Fire Department Connection and hydrant was added to
Sheet C5.1.
3. As discussed, the concrete pad for trash pickup has been added at the top of
Georgia Street, and shown on Sheet C3.1.
4. Recycling areas were added to the lower Parking Levell.
5. Mr. Trela has indicated that he met with the rep from Parks and Rec to discuss
the 40 existing units on site, and to calculate the impact fees.
6. Agreed.
7. The boat docking facility is under environmental feasibility study at the
present time. When the information on navigational impact and dredging are
known they will be forwarded to the Marine Department.
8. Ditto 7.
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
F \'.. ~ ~.D",;;;:a
I 1 ~
. .'.." n ....
. Iii ~....
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
The perimeter trees along the east property line have been added to Sheet
C3.I.
The landscape plan, Sheet LI.I, does not provide as many new trees as are
proposed for demolition on an inch for inch basis. Therefore, the payment-in-
lieu-of fees should be calculated.
The developer's arborist, Mr. Richard Almstead, has met with Rick Albee and
discussed the existing trees on this site. It is our understanding that none of
the existing trees are in a condition that require preservation, and as such are
being mostly demolished. The viable existing palms will be transplanted and
saved for replanting after construction.
The existing pavement of Osceola Avenue, in front of300 Osceola, will be
maintained in its present, or better condition for use by the residents. An
access agreement has been discussed with the Condo Association and was
received favorably. The document will be forwarded to the City when
executed by all parties.
The Salvation Army's architect, Mr. Alex Plisko, was contacted concerning
the project and given a site plan to review. His comments were addressed and
he expressed his willingness to recommend to his client that they provide a
"No Objection" letter.
The upper and lower parking level plans have been included.
A 4 feet sidewalk has been added along Georgia Street, shown on Sheet C3.I.
A 20 feet wide utility easement has been added to Sheet C5.1 along Osceola
Avenue between Jones and Georgia.
Ditto 16.
A portion of the gas line is proposed to be relocated, shown on Sheet C5.I.
The grading plans have not been prepared around the buildings; therefore the
proposed contours are not shown. Finished floor elevations have been
established, shown on Sheet C3.I, Upper Parking Level 2 and Lower Parking
Levell.
Sheet flow, inlets, and piping have been shown on Sheet C3.I. The inlets in
the visitor parking lot will remain only if there is enough depth to the top of
the parking structure to permit an inlet and piping. Otherwise, the visitor
parking lot and drives will sheet flow to the inlet shown near the south 20' fire
access lane, then piped to the retention pond.
Agreed.
Thicker property lines have been shown on all sheets.
Unity of Title will be provided when the titles are transferred, scheduled for
the end of this month. '
Five reet setback has been provided along the new p~~O'~ . ~i~~~~ ~ 0
of the Osceola Avenue nght of way. I i I If; ~U;
Circulation is shown on Sheet C3.I, and both parkin$!p..an
Sheet C5.1 has been provided. II ; FEB. !
! J ' 6 . ~.
.
Osceola Bay Club Project
Page 2.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLFARW....TER
.
e
Osceola Bay Club Project
Page 3.
27. Sheet L1.1 has been provided. Color plots and renderings will be prepared for
the CDB meeting.
28. The height has been calculated as 165 feet from street level, plus 14 feet for
the mean elevation of the site. Total 179 feet.
29. The number of units proposed is 150, which works out to 41.4 units per acre.
30. The site data table on Sheet C 1.1 has been updated to correspond to the plan
changes.
31. The tennis courts have been shifted to provide 10 feet for landscaping.
32. The color rendering indicates the exterior stucco color to be off white; glass
will have a green tint; roof colors are proposed to be terra cotta. Construction
materials include concrete for the structure and frame, with masonry infill.
Your prompt review of this additional information will be greatly appreciated.
KHR: br
cc. Mr. Rich Trela
)-~(cl€~~~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
_u_"""\
. t
.
.
(]1m
January 26, 2000
Kenneth II. Roush, P .E.
NORTHSIDE Engineering Services Inc.
304 S.Belcher RD.
Clearwater, Florida 33765
RE: Right of Way Vacation
Dear Mr. Roush:
GTE Media Ventures has no objection to the proposed vacation of
right of way for Osceola Avenue from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
Per the conversation we had at your office we will require a utility
easement for our facilities. The placement of our facilities from aerial
to buried shall be at the developers expense.
If you have any questions please contact me at (727)507-0710 or
(727)423-8915
Sincerely. ' /--:::::;7'- . .///' /'
/ ,/ /.'
~' ?/', ,,'
,,/' .,' .,.. ,-----.0 /'_ '_~7ii'''''''--r-?' ___. ~~_ _
/ -- . .
C' /
Brian Kemmerly
Engineering Dept.
GTE Media Ventures
._--~---._--
) ~(C~~W~
, ~. rJJ/
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLflIRW/I TER
.---~-
GTE Media Ventures
Incorporated
1280 E. Cleveland
FLCW5640
Clearwater, FL 33755
.
.
~!~
E WARNER
MMUNICATIONS
Date: January 20, 2000
Re: Proposed Vacation at Osceola Bay Club (Btw. Jones & Georgia St)
Dear: Kenneth H. Roush
Thank you for advising us of subject proposed project/vacation/adjustment.
Time Warner has no conflict.
Time Warner has no objections provided easements for our facilities are
granted or retained as shown on the attached drawing.
-L Time Warner has no objections provided applicant bears the expense for
relocation of any Time Warner facilities to maintain service to customers
affected by the proposed vacation.
In order to properly evaluate this request, Time Warner will need detailed
plans of facilities proposed for subject areas.
Time Warner has facilities within this area which may conflict with subject project
Please call one call locating.
Time Warner requires 30 days written notice prior to construction start date to relocate
their facilities.
Please refer any further correspondence and pre-construction meeting notices to:
W. Scott Creasy at 803-5053
Notes: Time Warner has existing aerial facilities within the R-Q-W.
Sincerely, /'
w. Scott Creasy 6 ~
Field Engineer II '
1 ;-".
I '
:J
) ~[;~~w~ 0,1
fEB f 6 311) .-
i, i
Ie L
! I JAN 2 7 2000
Ii i
U.
L_~_~, " ",____,.",
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
2530 Drew Stred, Clearwater, FloridG 33765 Tel. 727.797.1818 Fu 727.791.1668
A nit,..inll af Ti.nu, IF Il......r
.
.-
.-
.
02/15/2000 12:49
727-562-
FLA POWER CLWTR
PAGE 01
Florida
· Power
~~ COAPOR"TION
.......
Febmary 15, 2000
Mr. Kenneth Roush
Northside Engineering Services, Ine
304 South. Belcher Rd.
Clearwater, Florida 33765
Subject: Vacation of Right-of-Way, Osceola Av., Clearwater, Florida
Dear Mr. Roush:
Florida Power Corp. has no objection to the vacation of a portion of Osceola Av between
Jones Street and Georgia Avenue, Clearwater, provided that the following conditions are met.
1. Adequate easement is provided at no cost to Florida Power Corp. prior to vacation.
2. Florida Power Corp. is reimbursed for tbe cost to relocate/adjust existing facilities prior to
vacation.
If additional infonnation is needed, please call me at (727) 562-5660.
Sincerely,
Florida Power Corp. .
r; Lu7' ~ M01..D~'....'-.
~; a6nrad I,
Ie
:.1
J tin',. "~,'
- .. . , d I,
P~NNING & DEVELOPMENT " l'i i'! FE B 1 5 ~O!!1 J! 11
SERVICES I III III ib. n
~ I I.... J ,-"..ft
-_ CI~_OF__CL~-^~~I^Tc;;J' I I I I
------ . I
,-_.~-
GENERAL OFFiCE: 32.01 Thirty-fourth Street South. P.O. Box. 14042. St. Petersburg. Florida 33733. (813) 866-5151
A Rorlds PraU'fN$8 CQmp.ny
.
Clearwater Gas System
Providing Community Service since 1923
.
February 15,2000
Mr. Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
304 South Belcher Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NES # 9958
Dear Mr. Roush:
The Clearwater Gas System,
[8] Has no objection with your proposed:
o Construction
o Plat
[8] Vacation of Right-of-way
o Other
[8] Maintains facilities within the area. One of the following conditions must be met prior to the approval of
the final plat:
A. The owner/developer must reimburse The Clearwater Gas System for all cost incurred by
relocation of our facilities.
B. A utility easement must be platted to encompass existing facilities.
o Please contact "SUNSIllNE ONE CALL" AT (1-800) 432-4770 at least 48 hours prior to construction for
a location of our facilities.
Your cooperation with this office is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact meat -
Phone (727)462-6630 Ext. 242, or Fax (727)462-6636. ~~' I ~ i 1 \'jli ~ 0-"'\
~;:~~bUv6 :
~ (!~ ~ J ~l FEB I n am 111_,:
es C. Jerkins . PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
CADD Technician ":Jw~' pM UdniZYtllgz,.~ SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Administrative Offices & South Area Service Center. 400 North Myrtle Avenue. Clea ,
PO Box 4748. Clearwater, FL. 33758-4748. (727) 462-6630. Fax (727) 462-6636
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
.
.
am
February 10, 2000
GTE Network Services
1280 E. Cleveland St., FLCW5033
Clearwater, FL 33755
727-562-1101
727-562-1194
Facsimile: 727-562-9615
Kenneth H. Roush P.E.
304 South Belcher Road
Suite C
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: VACATION OF EASEMENT - OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
NES # 9958
Dear Mr. Roush:
We are in receipt of your request for information and offer the following comment{s)
GTE Network Services has no objections to the proposed vacation of the easement described above and as
per the attached survey, as long as the cost of relocating our existing facilities is bome by you.
Thank you for your cooperation with this office. If you need further assistance, please call AI Frazier at 727-562-
1140, GTE Engineering Office, Clearwater.
Very truly yours,
Mike Hall f;e(.k. /I...ff
Supervisor-Access Design
Cc: AI F~er, Access Designer
MH/bm ~
--_._---~_.._--- ---...---
, !~ ~~W~.rrY- . "
· J U~~~~ 'I. .
PLANNING & DF~\jE LOfMf\.JT
SERViCf~S
__~_~!~?!._~Lt !\il\'/.,\!: .,
Norlhsille
&~ Sew<<u 9He,
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: January 20,2000
To: City of Clearwater
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn: Mark Parry
City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services
Reference: Osceola Bay Club Project
NES #: 9958
Subject: Transmittal of Revised Site Development Plans
Dear Mr. Parry:
Pursuant to our meetings and conversations, herewith we submit the following for the DRC:
13 Each
1 Each
1 Each
5 Each
3 Each
3 Each
Revised Site/Civil Drawings C3.1
Residential Infill Project Criteria for Osceola Bay Club
3 Affidavits authorizing Richard Trela as the authorized agent re: ROW Vacation
Renderings of Osceola Bay Club
Parking Layout
Landscape Plan L 1.1
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any other questions or comments.
By:
Copies To: File
Richard Trela
PlANNfNG & DEVElOPMENT
SERVtCES
CrTY OF ClEARWATER
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33765
N E SADM I N@MI N DS P R I NG.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
FILE
f~ ~--o/- () 3>
Norlhsille
&~ Sew<<u 1~,
.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL.
TRANSPORTATION.
January 24, 2000
Ms Lisa ~erce
City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference:
Osceola Bay Club Project
NES Project No. 9958
Subject:
Transmittal of Additional Site Development Information
Dear Ms Sierce:
Transmitted with this letter are the following:
1 Each
Original Signature Affidavit from Antonios and Rahdert (Original
from Croft CflfOtlta flUll1 L'6Ifrlld) a/So enc~ ~
Color West Elevation
Site/Civil Sheet C3.1 with Trees from survey
6 Each
13 Each
Thank you again very much for your help and cooperation with the planning of
this project.
Sincerely,
~~INEE~NG SERVICES, INC.
Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
KHR: br
CC. Mr. Rich Trela
,~:ti~~OPMENT
~"'\t;CES
I ~Rw~TER
...~
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
c
Norlhsille
&~ Sewiea 11ee,
.
CIVIL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTAL-
TRANSPORTATION -
January 3, 2000
Mr. Mark Perry
City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference: Osceola Bay Club Project
NES Project No. 9958
Subject: Transmittal of Site Development Application and Plan
Dear Mr. Perry:
Transmitted with this letter are the following:
1 Each
1 Each
13 Each
Check for $450.00
Application for Site Development
Site/Civil Sheets Cl.I and C3.l
We are applying for a Residential Infill Project under the HDR Zoning District.
Also included are two areas of Right of Way to be vacated and dedicated by the City.
We are asking to be included in the January 27 DRC meeting and the February 15 CDB
meeting.
Thank you very much for your help and cooperation with the planning of this
project.
Sincerely, fL, (jO. ()/.o 3
NOR SIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, ING:.........n ..i "L" ~;.'.
- ~ 1'-1. t:.
Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
KHR.:br
9 ~~[E~W~~
.. I
JAN 1 2000 Ii i
..
..
304 SOUTH BELCHER ROAD
CLEARWATER. FLORI DA 33765
N ESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727.443 .2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
PlANNING & DE\'fJO[1'~[:~H
SERVICES
CtTYOF CLEARWATER
Receipt No: 1199814072 . .
Date: 1/6/2000 Ji* -
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No. Amount Due
-FLEX STND Flexible Standard - 45,000.00 @ $0.01 010-341262 $450.00
Payments:
Method Payer Bank No Acct Check No Amount Paid
Check OSCEOLA SAY DEVELOPMENT 101 $450.00
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $450.00
[
:.)
fL (j{) .0 t. () 3
"
.
.
Fax transmittal
""',- ~ ,"
'.','lr,'l",~ .~ ;,,~
~; }1 ij
iT"~ ,l, ~l
U ~~ '~,!
"'1
TO:
Ken Roush, Northside Engineering (fax 446.8036)
FROM:
Lisa Fierce, City of Clearwater
DATE:
February 10, 2000
RE:
Issues from January 27, 2000 Development Review Committee (DRC)
Meetingfor Osceola Bay Club
Attached are the notes I collected from the DRC meeting, as you requested.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 562.4561
Number of pages being transmitted including this cover sheet:
~
U : \My Documents\correspondence\Fax transmittal. doc
.
.
8. Case: FL 00-01-03 - Osceola Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
Location: 3.27 acres located on the west side of Osceola Avenue between
Georgia Street and Jones Street.
Zoning: HDR, High Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: 180 attached dwellings and within two 165-foot towers.
Request: Flexible Development approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment
Project with an increase in height from 30 feet to 165 feet; increase in density from
30 dwelling units per acre to 50 dwelling units per acre; and the vacation of
Osceola Avenue right-of-way from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
Presenter: Lisa L. Fierce, Development Review Manager.
ACTION: The ORC reviewed this application and it will be forwarded to the
Community Development Board for review on March 21, 2000. Before it is scheduled,
additional issues need to be addressed by February 15,2000, including:
1) Georgia Street slope - no more than 12% (Fire Department);
2) Need additional Siamese connection (Fire);
3) Need a pad for trash receptacle and area for appropriate truck maneuvering
(Solid Waste Department);
4) Need storage area for recycling (Solid Waste);
5) Need more information about existing units to calculate parks and
recreation impact fees (Parks and Recreation Department);
6) Need open space and recreation fees to be paid prior to approval of
development (Parks and Rec);
7) Need to information on the proposed docks regarding navigational impact
(Marine Department);
8) Need information on dredging; (Marine);
9) Need additional tree survey information - 50 feet off of property lines
(Planning Department);
10) Need to address tree replacement policy - inch for inch replacement or pay
fee (Planning);
11) Need tree preservation plan from a certified arborist (Planning);
12) Need to address access easement for 300 Osceola (related to vacation
request) (Engineering Department);
13) Need no objection letter from Salvation Army (Engineering);
14) Need parking garage plans with building footprint outlined (Engineering);
15) Need four-foot sidewalk on Georgia Street (Engineering);
16) Need easement for sewer and water near Jones Street (Engineering);
17) Need easement for water line and sewer overlay on Osceola Avenue
(Engineering) ;
18) Relocate gas line from Jones Street (Engineering);
19) Need site plan with contours and finished floor elevations (Engineering);
20) Show sheet flow for stormwater (Engineering);
21) Traffic impact fee (TIF) required prior to Certificate of Occupancy
(Engineering);
.
.
22) Need site plan that shows thicker property line outlining site (Planning);
23) Need unity oftitle (Planning);
24) Provide five feet of side setback (minimum) along Osceola Avenue
(Planning);
25) Need new site plan with circulation (planning);
26) Need separate utility sheet (Planning);
27) Need landscape plan with more detail especially for COB meeting
(Planning);
28) Need to address height of buildings - need number from mean elevation of
site (Planning);
29) Need the final number of units and density proposed (planning);
30) Need data table on each plan if possible (Planning);
31) Need to shift tennis courts and provide room for landscaping (shrubs and
palms within 10-foot wide area) (Planning); and
32) Need information on materials/colors (Planning).
IIMS:!PDS\C D B1agendas DRC & CDBiDRC:!OOO\Ol JanuaryDRC actiOn agenda Ol-r'-:!OOO.doc
.
..
.
.
Case: FL 00-01-03 - Osceola Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
Location: 3.27 acres located on the west side of Osceola Avenue between
Georgia Street and Jones Street.
Zoning: HDR, High Density Residential District.
Proposed Use: 180 attached dwellings and within two 165-foot towers.
Request: Flexible Development approval of a Residential Infill Redevelopment
Project with an increase in height from 30 feet to 165 feet; increase in density from
30 dwelling units per acre to 50 dwelling units per acre; and the vacation of
Osceola Avenue right-of-way from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
Presenter: Lisa L. Fierce, Development Review Manager.
F. .Ftpr
. C, f.
~., ;,-:.: ,-I
'~;-'fi.'t;:.J ...'.... ;...
:1~,
i~~
Ii>
-
Iii,' '-'"",.-
~ 8.
. '.
"..~
ACTION: The DRC reviewed this application and it will be forwarded to the
Community Development Board for review on March 21, 2000. Before it is scheduled,
additional issues need to be addressed by February 15, 2000, including:
1) Georgia Street slope - no more than 12% (Fire Department);
2) Need additional Siamese connection (Fire);
3) Need a pad for trash receptacle and area for appropriate truck maneuvering
(Solid Waste Department);
4) Need storage area for recycling (Solid Waste);
5) Need more information about existing units to calculate parks and
recreation impact fees (Parks and Recreation Department);
6) Need open space and recreation fees to be paid prior to approval of
development (Parks and Rec);
7) Need to information on the proposed docks regarding navigational impact
(Marine Department);
8) Need information on dredging; (Marine);
9) Need additional tree survey information - 50 feet off of property lines
(Planning Department);
10) Need to address tree replacement policy - inch for inch replacement or pay
fee (Planning);
11) Need tree preservation plan from a certified arborist (planning);
12) Need to address access easement for 300 Osceola (related to vacation
request) (Engineering Department);
13) Need no objection letter from Salvation Army (Engineering);
14) Need parking garage plans with building footprint outlined (Engineering);
15) Need four-foot sidewalk on Georgia Street (Engineering);
16) Need easement for sewer and water near Jones Street (Engineering);
17) Need easement for water line and sewer overlay on Osceola Avenue
(Engineering);
18) Relocate gas line from Jones Street (Engineering);
19) Need site plan with contours and finished floor elevations (Engineering);
20) Show sheet flow for stormwater (Engineering);
21) Traffic impact fee (TIF) required prior to Certificate of Occupancy
(Engineering) ;
I
.
.
22) Need site plan that shows thicker property line outlining site (Planning);
23) Need unity of title (Planning);
24) Provide five feet of side setback (minimum) along Osceola Avenue
(Planning);
25) Need new site plan with circulation (Planning);
26) Need separate utility sheet (Planning);
27) Need landscape plan with more detail especially for CDB meeting
(Planning);
28) Need to address height of buildings - need number from mean elevation of
site (Planning);
29) Need the final number of units and density proposed (planning);
30) Need data table on each plan if possible (Planning);
31) Need to shift tennis courts and provide room for landscaping (shrubs and
palms within 1 a-foot wide area) (Planning); and
32) Need information on materials/colors (Planning).
1!A1S:!PDS C D B'agendas DRC & CDBIDRC:!OOO'Ol Jan:..;r)"DRC actIOn agenda Ol-:!--:!OOO.doc
I""""
..I~(. ~LOF rill ",
,._\ "~.m", ~~__
,'~..I.l #.........~_
,.\C:;$,"',\I., ~\ !i: ~
....,......~..
;:~:'--~~=
':.~; ~,.
_~-.. , r-o::.\
-y~-, JJ ~\~
-";:Jf.",w'JI~~.'
...."~TE~.,,,.
"""
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PL\:\:\I:\G & DEVELOP\fE:\T SER\ 1CES :\D\fI:\ISTR:\TIO:\
PO'! OFFiCE B,)x --J:---J:8. CLUR'X IIIR, Fi.,;;!!!\ .35-),'i---J:---J:8
-'ll:\'UP.\l SER\lCES B!ILD[:\(~. lOll SOlTH -'In:TLE .\\1:\1 E. CLL\R\\\IEil, FLe'K1D\ 35-'i()
TELFP! il)'.E (-2-) 'i62--!'i() - h.\ (-2- J 'iC,2-1'i-(]
February 1, 2000
F I L. E
F~ (!)O-Of -0"
Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
304 S. Belcher Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: Community Development Board Meeting
~~
Dear Mr. Roush:
The application that you submitted for property Osceola Bay Club located between 300
and 500 Osceola Avenue was reviewed and found to be sufficient by the Development
Review Committee on January 27, 2000. Your application has been scheduled to be
reviewed by the Community Development Board on March 21, 2000.
The meeting will take place at 1:00pm, in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City
Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4558.
~~ncel7.1 ours,
j/Y/---
Mark T. Parry
Planner
~
i' r' ( )
i il
@
""","
t"~~~LOF rill ##,
\~_\ \)"'"'''' ~~-
..\~"" ~",..~':.
~~" \ I, ~ ,;;:"
",~~-....."_______l. ~ ..
:~:~:- oct;
r::-m.
.. C'f"':..C" ~..
':..~-;'" '~'..."'.... ,,~~
~:?{f";:,;;;;,,,~~\\\
'.... JiTER ,I'
'1'111"
.
CITY OF
.
CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MC:\'ICIPAL SERVICES BUILDI:\'G, 100 SOllH MYRTIE AVE:\'CE, CIE'.R\X',\TER. FLORID,"" 33'"'56
TELEPHO:\'E (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-':+5-:-6
January 11, 2000
t=
Ie.
ii
~ I r=-
!5 ~c..,..,-.
~(j) 'O/-():3
~::~
Kenneth H. Roush, P.E.
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
304 S. Belcher Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
RE: Application for Flexible Development; to allow attached dwellings on the site
located between 300 and 500 Osceola Avenue as a Comprehensive Infill Project
with an increased height from 30 feet to 197 feet.
Dear Mr. Roush:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to allow an attached dwelling complex as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project located between 300 and 500
Osceola Avenue and determined that the application will be complete pending the receipt
of the following items:
~ 1. Vacation request form for the proposed vacation of Osceola Avenue;
..... 2. Elevations and/or perspectives of the proposed building;
... 3. A landscape plan;
'4. The nine Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria
addressed;
, 5. A survey clearly delineating the boundaries of the site and the edge of
the Preservation district; and
6. A Parking plan showing all circulation on site.
In addition, there are several other items that need to be addressed. It appears that there
are three curb cuts on Jones Street. The amount of ingress/egress points are to be limited
to two. The westerly curb cut appears to only service a visitor parking lot. This lot
should be reversed so that it is accessible from the center ingress point and moved
northward to provide a 15 foot landscape buffer on Jones Street. The size of the site
needs to be clarified. Does the 3.27 acres include the proposed vacated street right-of-
way and exclude the proposed dedicated street right-of-way? The density needs to be
clarified. The site plan submitted shows that there are 179 dwelling units proposed. The
periphery plan allows up to 50 dwell~mtsOp~t\iH~. Assuming that the 3.27 acres
BRi\.'\ J, :\C\GST. :.l""YOR-Cml~lISSIO\ER
ED HOOPER. VICE :-l\YOR-CO~I~llSSIO\ER BOil CL\RK, C:U'.:'oI::": ,"
ED H.\RT. CO~I~llS~IO\ER @ J.B, }.If{\SO\, C(''.!' ::..
"EQlAL E~lPLOY:.IE:\T .\.\D .\FFlR.\L\TI\l: ACT10:\ L\IPLOlTR"
""","
..',\~~LOF rill ;;...
,'.l~ ~....""",~X"'-
\~..t ...........'7~
:C:$'\ ,I, -~'::. ~.
.. t;'-- 'rfTf 1 ~ ~
~~\' i4IIf~:
~~---- /~~~
_ ........ -,. -~- Jt. \
-... '/f."'''''' ~~."
"'##)1TER ,,'
'1IJlI"
.
CITY OF
.
CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MC:'\ICIP.AL SERVICES BCIIDI:'\G, 100 SOCTH MYRTIE AVE:'\L'E. CLHR\\'ATER. FLORID.~ 3r=;6
TELEPHO:'\E (727) 562-4567 F.-\.x (727) 562--tS-6
includes the vacated street right-of-way and excludes the dedicated right-of-way, 163
dwelling units would be permitted.
The application has been entered into the Department's filing system.
Provided that the above items, concerns and questions are addressed by January 18,2000,
the application will be reviewed for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee on
January 27, 2000 at 11:45 a.m. in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216
- on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in
Clearwater.
You or your client should be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4558.
;:;t-:ours, ~
~ -
Mark T. Parry
Planner
O';E CiTY. O\E f1 T(RE.
BRL~\ I :\1 \C,ST. .\L\YOR.(mj\II'Sj()\Eii
ED HOOPER. VICE \L\YOR-CO.\I\lI""IIY.Eii
ED H.IRT. CO\\\\lS"JO\ER
(i)
BOB l~L\;),;":. (~ ).\.:\:;,~..:;
.IB Je'j">u\.
"EQLII. E\lPI.U'I\IISI" .\\!J _\FFIR\L\TI\l: .\cr:n'; E\\I'ICYE<:."
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: June 20. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: Bl
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Kenneth H. Roush
LOCATION:
400 Jones Street
REQUESTS:
PLANS REVIEWED:
· Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 174 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dwelling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and permit a six-foot fence within the front setback
along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street,
and
· Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
Site plan and site survey submitted by Northside
Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 3.33 acres (inclUding right-of-way proposed to be vacated)
3.24 acres (without right-of-way)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast corner
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
East Portion of the Site: 150 feet by 155 feet i:
West Portion of the Site:522 feet by 320 feet i:
.
.
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vlclmty IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
UPDA TE:
This case was discussed at length by the Community Development Board at its May 16, 2000
meeting. The Board continued the case to enable the applicant to finalize the elevation plans and
landscape plan. The applicant has submitted revised plans including amended building elevations
(with a lower building height), revised landscape plan, and minor site plan changes with an
adjustment to the vacation of right-of-way request. The application also includes approval of a
six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Georgia Street and Jones Street.
The City has retained an architect (Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe) to review and assist in modifying
the design.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.33 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Page 2
.
.
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
. Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
. Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
. Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
. Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification (instead of the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category ofCBD).
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
Based on the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current HDR zoning district, the site
characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff believes that the site is appropriate for
high-rise residential development. In determining the appropriate density for the site, the staff
was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future
density in the City should be located downtown where land and infrastructure are available.
Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical component of an economically healthy
full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central Business District is 70 units per acre in
approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the remaining center section from Myrtle
Page 3
.
.
Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units per acre. The transition from the
City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density proposed by the Osceola Bay
Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
areas will be the Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within two 14-story towers. Two levels of underground parking will be
provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated entrance/exit.
Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking garage.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, blue vertical
columns and flat arches. The east elevation of the towers incorporates a curved wall design.
Both the east and west elevations include extensive windows and balconies. The terracotta color
clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates
the use of cupola-type enclosures.
The site plan includes a drive-thru canopy near the entrance between the two buildings. It is
designed with the similar tile roof treatment to match the buildings. The design as proposed
incorporates a 100-foot space between the towers that helps preserve a view to the water. The
proposed amenities include tennis courts, pools, and spa.
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. The landscape plan has been revised and exceeds the requirements of
Code. This includes a mixture of various trees, shrubs, palms and annuals.
The Residential Infill Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
midpoint of the peak/eave of the main pitched roof The HDR District permits up to 130 feet for
sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown District (to which the site will be
rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for
174 feet which includes 164 feet from the mean elevation to the top of the living units, plus ten
feet of mechanical area (representing the midpoint of the main pitched roof structure).
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre (150 dwelling units).
The applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating the portion of the road
Page 4
.
.
just north of Georgia Street, in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. That portion will be conveyed to
the owners of the Belvedere Apartments. The southern third of the road between Jones and
Georgia Streets will be realigned and through movement will be maintained. A portion of the
subject property will be dedicated to the City as right-of-way for the realignment of the road.
Final lane alignments and widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor along Georgia Street shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to
meet current engineering standards.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units 150 dwelling Yes
units units (50 du/ac - units (45
Peri he Plan du/ac
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
Page 5
.
.
B. FLEXffiILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 145,055 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.33 acres
with right-of-
way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 174 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue - 3 feet
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 10
minimum feet; North
(Georgia Street
- 15 feet)
PARKING 1.25 space/unit 15 spaces 190 spaces Yes
SPACES (188 spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.665 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The Residential Infill Project use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
C. FLEXffiILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CBD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
project height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 174 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
Page 6
.
.
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Jntill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Jntill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Jntill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Jntill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Jntill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
Page 7
.
.
The City retained an architect to review the proposed design changes that were introduced
at the May 16, 2000 CDB meeting. The City's consulting architect has worked with staff
and the applicant's architect to modify the roof treatment and the east elevation design.
The proposal, as amended, is well articulated with unified elevations (especially east and
west) and coordinated architectural elements.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
Page 8
.
.
..
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a IOO-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The site plan and elevations have been amended to include a request for 174 feet in total height
for the two towers. The Planning Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet.
It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks will be required pursuant
to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not constitute approval of the
docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential 10011 Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following conditions:
1) That Osceola Avenue right-of-way be maintained north of Jones Street, adjacent to
300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere apartments);
2) That the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City Commission and
relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised application to be
submitted);
3) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation;
Page 9
.
.
4) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
5) That the building permit application reflects the design as submitted and/or
modified by the CDB;
6) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor, and along the west side of Osceola Avenue;
7) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
8) That conditions 1-4 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Georgia Street. Final confirmation of the utility locations may
require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The
Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to resolve this issue prior to
review of the vacation request b~y the City Commission.
) ~,
.....,1' /~
Prepared by: Lisa L. Fierce: ~.J/
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
I\MS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIC D B\FLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 STAFF
REPORT jinal.doc
Page 10
~
NORTH
1"=300'
"Aerial Map ..
Malcolm Craft; George Radd~ & Anothy Jlfarkoupdous
400 Jones Street
FLOO-OJ-03
l
t~~~.
l~~~
~#
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FlDRIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
1" 1320'
. .~
Location Map
Malcolm Craft; George Raddart; & Anothy Markoupdous
400 Jones Street
FLOO-OJ-03
~
NORTH
~
~
~
~
~
I 0
c=J~ NOKOMIS
?5 LEBEAU ~ I
~ c==J I-- IROQUOIS
~ PRINCESS ~~ -)-'1.
iiic=J OSAGE ~ ~'>'$'l?
PLEASANT c:::J:5B U
r---l MOHAWK" r\ \
jBURsr-cr-J c=:::J!!i z~
V5 D D j ST ~
'fJAIR"'ON/lT .11 ~d~RMON7~;;;;d~D ~D?'~~
o ~u ""NNE"O l5T1 ;0 ~~
~f:"'~ARfjSHA"~:, ":;D:HADL~R~ND'!:oc::';, ~ 1:0
c, Q' '!!~~ ;;:Uo ~ w" 0
Ii' "'.., II' :> CARLTON ~,' I" RUSSELL
.:::. '<{ ~ II IIQL-------.l ~ C::===[r
L[jENGMAoN>: ["sfN, ~L-J~~ I :;NGERINE ST I~ ~
~ Bf~U_ gD D I I~ 0
Q:- ll: LA SALLE 5T Cl:: ~
PAL'" f2 D I I" "
SLUFF ~ PALM BLUff 5T;E
-:1] D( ii:~J= [[[]:~!DI
!oo
' "ARGOD C=:J D
C/O EfD
-.J SEMINCLE 5T
lao / //1/ I 0 C=:J D~I
v: ~ ELDRIDGE S T
~0~ ~[DlllJ~~ M~E c=J CJ
OJ' if> MAPLE ~ c=J =
~Wfj D ~ PLAZA ~EEST ST, " ~" '>'
GEORGIA ~" !J1 c=J C "
jJ"' ART 5T 0 HART 5T ~CKSON
~JONE5 D~y D Din~D~D'>'D~
D 0 [][[J 0 ~~D c:J CJ ~U:> ~ " :0
~c D ~:D D D~DSb;9~
'" ~ ~ ~ HENDRICKS 0 LJLJ c::::=J
i "e~f~~D h 0 CrD~D
~[]gDID :sO D~qK I CLES:LAND I D~D
::0 ~ <{ 0 or----l D~ II ~r---l 0 '>'
~ PIERCE 5T I ~L--J L--J,,~ "
~D DtD0r~ 0 9~~ST ~ufjDi ,k?o(]~
COURT 5T [] i ~I D D:g g ~ G~ULD:> 5T ~
\l~D"A~EY~ D OCOURT iiK\ ~ i'ic:=J ~ ~A
\j 0 ~ U BROWNELL 5T ~
"~'"ro 0 O'D I""""'~~"""'I D [J C~ I ~I
D ~ I D I TURNER I
PINE PINE 5T
ST
PALMETTO
A
~
~
:;l
v
~.nn~
~'-~ Ut3
~ GROVE t: ST
NT I D~
ST
o
\<~~~:':::---- CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA
/(;~0..'\
$ ,d,,, .. ~
~~ '--: ~! PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
\. ~~ ---- ""cG::-/
---<;:,~~,;;",'\' ENGINEERING
.
\
SlREET
/ /
/ /
7 J
/L
I J"
:f
---------
'--'--
STREET
-u
- ..r.;J' e .r:l
~ I~~~- ~
!r- ~
~
/-----------
GFORr.tA
~>-7-
f------____
..
r-----_____Z
________ F'
I
I
I
; I
~ I
~
~
I
~ I
~. I
I
I
;...,.
~-------
f-----___
.....
~I
I
I
..NJ~ :IJ t- - . - fC~"" f--
fo.~ s ~~ r
,
f-------
I
/
..+5
--
/1
I / ~
1
1/ ~
/ 1'1
I / L
I I -
--+- ~I---
(5J --+- ..
--+- f-- -
-+-
I f--+-- l.l
'--
MAPlE ...
r--~ ~
,---
III I;f-J ~
r-- \)
L- ...
::>
~
c-__
I :.
I
I
I---- -
I : t+-=
I -L
HART
z
f-- i
~
,
~ ....., c:n>c M"
~ , ~O\e\ ~~ , f--
0 . ~
! t~
z ~
I d'" [ll I 3 I. ~
, I z I
I I I
STREET 5.R. 590
,---
e-----
r--~
c
... ~~
I ::>
z
~ r-- III
I c r-~ Ir-U
~
r--
~ r--
I I r--
I III
0
I
'"
~O\e
DREW
.4
.50
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
OWNER: Malcolm Craft, George Roddort, & Anothy Morkoupdous I CASE FLOO-01-03
ADDRESS: 400 Jones Street I ZONING HDR
ATLAS PAGE: 2778 I SEC: 9 I TWP: 29S IIANGE: 15E
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
60-87 V, , i i i i ~/ ~ ,U ,.f "i A:, "1 ,,,! i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '" ELDRtDCE ... STREET
I----------L~, ~1~~I~I~~,mnJ !. 12JI3 610/S5 f C"24g (;2<g;
1-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ 3 4 ~ ~ 7 819 ~ 671 1611'<)'1) IQ ~ '-' IQ 610
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~r 2 60./ 1e09 11/'4 .0./ /609 23 26~ 608
I- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ """'i~ G . 3 L . .0. / LT) I Q,:7W.ko~ 2F L 2-;>.0.
_ _ _ + 1\ J( 4fiOD'05 91.. '6.0.7 j,05 21 28 .04
It GOV .......-.~.00-r"r.09. "f201 4629
LOT 4 ~ -,.. 6 -\ 7, 8 7 ~
_ _ _ \ '01 J '00 601 J"W..~ ~ T
--- ~!-7HARRINGTON512\ 513 8 r
9 ~ 508 1 NIC 0 9
11 5-77 510 \ 51f
508 609 7 61Q
\~ 507 5
HARBOR BLUFFS ~ ,6 508 50.
WATERFRONT g 150; r ~ 4 1 38 5 502
CONDO -i. 504
21-31
~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~'~P- ~_~
. ""0 9. 8~ 7 I
c .~_
200 ~ , 1Z12 3 I,. 5 ~ ~ 1 21 3 ~
~ 3 53'01' ~ 7: 200 50 ~",.H 11 ~
~ SlREET I S.R. 590
::: 12/06 ~ 55 ~... 8 7
12/05 12 'no 128 - _ ~ 9 6
127 L .c:
"' ~~
M~
~~
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
=<1
!!I
~I
~l
ul
~
~
"'00 .
~l'ID"'..
500 2 1
40L~
STREET ..... !if
c ~o" 7 j'
~ I
I~ 6 o.
;J~\.." ".; ~
""i 4 3
0: -fO, 400
~ 311
J= =====--
I L------_ ~
J
8 40
c.,.. yy- ."
.J;J. <Ii,......,
11 (j 40
43/04 31
f-----____
z
~
~.
--------
~
~3/0
'-
Z 4~/03
309
43/06 .. ..
:. c
s. _ 306
B -
..
--------
A LUTZ
~-7R
BELVEDERE APTS
I CO-OP UNREC
. 300 4
..-...
~2 ~
01
1--------
",5<0
"'0. N
~
300
c Ill-1
c 5!
'--.
, 0
d
- ~ 221
~ III
~ 0
R
10'~I//~' ~-." ~_~~ _ =-' 5
12/071281
i~~i~~ . '490-557 9205-625 I
~1ln-01-~
.....,_ LS ff61 I
1415- COACHMAN PARK I MAIN UBRAll'~
"' ,,_ j,f; JEFFoRD & SMOYER ~-l~ Ii" 961-
*' 101" 2 \V 347
'J/j I" 1396-S7S .4119-1313 86
"., (f 44 -1864 d
l / I I 1 ~
I I
2 _'roc 17.40'1-137-4
5...; , ~ HAYDEN
i'5 [;;2"' He':.
z
""
..
~
o
II
II
~I
~
J
c::
i
j'
43/07
200
::;:pn
...
~ 12/ 12/04
'"
12/03
all
I
0>
<::
507 2 & ... 8 610
r4 3 SLO ~ ,
310
3D'
HARTS R 2ND
so, 2..-.. l'f '
4Q9 L"l I;;;
407 3 'If 'If
:.. g 4
~ 406 6 ~ > 3-41
~ ~
4037]0'"' 2
gg,/ '0 0
401 8 l~~! :g~E
In ~ 00 IQ Ie
_%..1 HART
82'~2~: ~ ~ ~
r'S, D: 7 cbp ~ IF~ '"
t::i!..JN 7 .-~"
~ 31744/021~ 8 ~
c
'"
.~
10 /.
"
~~
c,C-'14
r, <:;:-36~
p~
~~
34
-6"
",37
6Of;
ill"
'0 pJ
33
--
32
--
60,31
!if MAPLE
60'
00
5'3 19 1 ~Gir-'
.1, ~
~wL
L~ ~lL
~ 6
160/ t:14 ,I,
3 711
405 13 81
403 12 t-g-
11:~ ~
o ffi ~ ~ ~
8 Ii! 309
~ 8 7
307 (4)
6
2
o
- ~
2 :l
I -
d )~~3t
~ a ~
8
6
7 -_
@, 22-3';
601
~33 1
I
2
124
5 122
120
t':::\3 11/01
2 ~ ,';?4
~r---i-11
....Cf> U
<::
J FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
~ I CASE
!!
:9 OWNER: Malcolm Craft, George Raddart, & Anothy Markoupdous FLOO- 01- 0.3
-0
B
0 I ZONING
'3 HRD
, ADDRESS: 400 Jones Street
<::
-;:;
j ATLAS PAGE: 2776 I SEC: 9 I TWP: 29S IIANGE: 15E
<n
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
\ Ig ~ ~ :g 1; ~ /" 'V... 7" ~ ~ : ~ l
v ~ ., ., .,.,., 700/ J':C ':C ':C':C 700 " "" ~"" 700 g ~
...l'" "'''' '" /1",,,, <0701.,.,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ElDRtDGE ... STREET
----------!g, 1--r,1~1~1~1~~I~i;U !ell 12 J13 610755 I ~ti24:g ~"_~
f-- _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ ....... tm1Zl~41-~16 7-ls 9 ~ /611 . ~ 10 "'~v '" 610
_________ + 2 60./ 1.09 11/14 60./ /609 23 2613160.
________ ~-t:.:. 3 L . 606 ~ I rL7Vfj~0'" 2~ L ~06
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ I'- Jr 4nO'Ir605 9/ _1660.7 j05 21 28 60.
T ~ -.90VT J,QT-1... f-,..l T .I. sA...'.00 ~~03 8/17 602/ J 20 1 - 4 6 29
.11 GOVT LOT 4 ~-c7 6 7 18 7 T ~-
________ 601 600 601 19 ~",...,
~r- HARRINGTON"2\ 513 . I'" ...
11 5-77 9 ~ 5091NICH [sON 9
5::8 ~~9 7 510 507 2 Be ~ 8 610
\~ 507 5 ~ 3 SLO N 7_
HARBOR BLUFFS jj 6 SOB ~ ; 6506
WATERFRONT ~ 50; t06 ~ 4 1 38 5 '-----so2
CONDO i. 50.
21- 31 HARTS rig: 2ND
600 2' 50,@"",1
500
40 L....- .lS!!L ~09 I ;;;
GFOR~'" STREET _!; '07 3.. 4 ...
G~077J6 ;:'g
-'-'-'--'- 1 '05 6
1..... 6 0 ~ I 3-47
.. -103 7 J 5 <102
J~~ 2'02 9~, 10.00
4078 ti ~~~ ~
In OOlQIO '0
o
60-87
---------
---------
---------
~
8 .0
~ !!Jl
~ "U
11 V . 40
43/04 31
310
308
--------
J
~
~
~.
3
~ -101 4
~ 311
400
~1 HART
3Z1-.i~1 "''' '"
91~ ~ 3-111 ~ .R~ ~ ~3~
~7._ 308
~ 31744/029 8 7 6
1& 305
--------
~;..,.
'--------
~ ~}/O
. f----
Z 43/03
309
43/06 .,
. ;;;
_.3P6
A
LUTZ
.7f1
i306
t;;-2 3
1 "
~ ~
.., '"
5
~ ~ "
N co, ~
II:' lQ II)
" ~
..
~jlO
"'0. C\I
"',,'^
~2 ;J
01
--------
4
f>
BELVEDERE APTS
J CO-OP UNRE~oo .
fll-1
g s:
300
I C
o
'"
~
. ~
~ 22'
" Ul
, 0
z
~.~-
~-,-
/1
1D'~1 II t2.1i:cm .. :::. ',,- '''I'' '"
~~~~=~~4. 12/08 l~[~~;;~:
u.I 17:lllQ L.S 1/61 I
1415- COACHMAN PARK I MAIN UBRA~~
II, JEFFoRD & SMOYER ~-l~ '1' 96'
'*' t01" 2 \..!.J 347
'19 I' 1396-575 4119 1313 36
"'l ct 44 -1664
'"
;f
~
;~~~~~~~ ~
U5
,
, 2
e..n 1:g
l'5 512 '"
::2 0:: 3
s Q36~
~"lCl: ~
~o:--
~~
34
33
--
32
--
60731
-
~MAPLE:
,
c
.,
/
g~'!
!UL
60fR
r~t
60~ fIJ
601
~;:::.'
5'8 19 I
5090 :18
...507~~ ~ f--
::> 16U.I. In\
~ 05 {ii\. ="
~~3_':':_ j,l.j5
l'
60' ~14
405313
6
7 :J
8-
-g"-
~
~ 10 9" 8@ 71i
~ iL
'II fZJ T IS ~ 1 21
200 ~ 1., 2 3" 41 5 z ~ H-I1
3 _ 20' 'l 200 ~ .tOt!! I
55 !; ~ ~ I 50 'J I ~
403 12
LlL
:ii
ffi ~ ~ ~
i 809
C1 8 7
307 (4)
_3~
300
, "
11 2 ;;
" ")~:;3~
i ~ ~ ti
:;: STREET S.R. 590
5J :~~: '" ~
12/06 , 55 1 J5 8 7 60
12/05/ ~~ 133 1
12/01 128 9 6
126 127 2 c: 2
... [fi~ 10 I". '"
::> 12/04 5 122 t:;\3 11/01
~ '" 118 120
~~ \: ~ 11~4
~
~..9 2 c U
~,.: ~ 5
Cl
12/03 ;m, ~O'V4 ~~
d ~ 1
~
t--_Voc 17401-1~74
HAYDEN
43/07
4
H6-
'"
~
zoo
f
/
I
r
I
I
1
8'; 7 '-~
@, 22-3:-
3~
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OWN Ell: Malcolm Croft, George Roddart, & Anothy Morkoupdous I CASE FLOO- 01- 03
ADDIlESS: 400 Jones Street I ZONING HRD
ATLAS PAGE: 2776 I SEC: 9 I TWP: 29S T IANGE: 15E
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
. CITY OF 'CLE~ \TER
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
PLANNING &: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICEs BUlID~, 100 SOUIB MYR.TI.B AVENUE. Z- FLOOR
PHONE \fIl)-S62-4567 FAX m:n S62-4S76
lJis fDrm ~'be subnittIId for all ~ b' ~ UlIIIS. ...:- n \.. 'RY -. ncnI1!SideIdlat ~ fences.
SIgns, '4eSfIed rtgtds. d8~'''' agI88IIliDI.b, S8lII Ills. dDdIs. marinas and aIw nm-lIiuclIns and ham8 .......~
APPUCANT, J:liROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT MAIlE .
IIAILING ~
PHONE JftlllBER
~I T OWNER:S
. AGENT.MAIE
IIAII.JNG ADDRESS
PHONE NUIIBER
.."
"lLC
. -
100 PierceStreat, "Suite-1101 Clearwater.
33755'
(727) 804-1417
FAX"~ :
. ,
Contract for Sa
(LJst all ~.
Anthon
from:. Malcolm Craft' Geor e Raddart and
,
Kenneth H. '!\Qush P .E.'
<;
~
~,
'Il
\'--
. ~
Servicas Inc. 304 S.' Belcher Rd. Clwr FL ,33765 Q,
-
FAXNUMBER: (7'2,7) 446-80~6.: .
(727) 443-2869
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
SIIC2:l:1 ADDRESS: . Between 300 - 500 Osceola A~enue. / it D i) J>:h' f j
f
LEGAL~~.
PARCB.. -.sER:
I. C .
.- .'; I f\'
'.:' ".l
See Attached
09/29/15, 430 OSOO'and othe s
. tf; 0 -
~Conde \ll1its ..... ' .
i~Qf~ I~ ~ raams or squaNtaaIaga 01
3.27 a :es ,
s.
~.~ OF REQUEST.
lY\ ctr/l..'dVl 0\N1 '3fJcl"-
DOES THIS APPUCA1i6N INVOLVE
II {
I, the undersigned, admowtedge that all
represel.&.:dIuns made in" this appllcatlan
are true and accurate.tD'1he best of my
knawtedge:/
,/ ,.~./. .' /'c/
~~~ ..c
~ oIlJRl1*tyQMW' or 1~_IW....
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
SIZE OF SITE:
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Sworn to and subscribed
. -JAf)""" t-~ ' AD...18: ~" me~
UC-h: .~~ S' I relic:' ispea;aO.~
.~ j ~
ide..liftcatb I. (
t'-J
'I
'J
'^'
-.(
,
C\J
"...(
v:
FOR PLANNING OffiCE USE ONLY: .'
LAND USE Da ....... OF PAReS..: ZCNING: 1-1 D R- fVTURE DES1GNA11ON: C-Dt3
ZONING ctASSlFlCATION OF ADJACerr PARC8..S: NORT1i: H. D (1... SOUnt:. D EAST: tt-l) I:f {" WEST: H"~J r-
FtmlRF' ANn 1I~ ('"j A.~FtCA'TlnN'OF AOJACENTPARC8.S: NORTH: c1)~-souTH: ~T::__ ~ WEST: ~
ROIl Roush
.:~ (100 81ePIO .
......... Oe&. '.
-!..
)/'
.
.
RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS CRITERIA
for OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
Updated April 18, 2000
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
economically impractical without deviation from the intensity and development standards.
Due to the high cost of land and construction to create the aesthetically outstanding buildings and
maximize the open views of the Bay and Gulf, the configuration of the 2 towers with extensive
green area and landscaping have been designed to enhance this unique site on the bluff
overlooking Clearwater Bay.
It is not practical to build less than 163 units. This number of proposed units does not exceed the
169.5 units allowed per the 1993 Periphery Plan (50 units per acre) for this area. Therefore, in
order to maximize the open views to the water, the height of 153 feet above street elevation (169
feet from the median bluff elevation plus 10 feet for the penthouse terrace) is necessary for the 2
towers, with setbacks from the realigned Osceola Avenue right of way to the new pavement of
less than 15 feet in the front.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residentiallnfill Project
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The entire development, from the landscaped, gated entry with a security guard, to the 2
swimming pools with decks and steps overlooking the water, is designed to raise the value not
only of this site, but also of its surroundings. This is due to the quality and aesthetics of the
design of this project.
The approximate proposed value with the new structures, landscaping and amenities will be
about $75 million.
3. The uses within the Residentiallnfill Project are otherwise permitted in the district.
Attached dwellings are permitted in the land use for this district. A social area, parking below
grade, tennis courts and pools are also included in the development.
4. The uses within the Residentiallnfill Project are compatible with adjacent lands uses.
Yes, they are compatible with the adjacent land use. The adjacent lands to the north and south
comprise multi-family developments along with their amenities. The adjacent land to the east is
owned and used by a religious organization.
5. The development of the parcel(s) proposed for development as a Residentiallnfill Project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Yes, the Mediterranean architectural design, landscaping and parking exceeding the code
requirements, use of higher quality materials in the structure and architectural details, the removal
of the huge dogleg from the Osceola Avenue right of way, and the visual aesthetics of this
project, all combine to vastly upgrade the immediate vicinity. Also see #2 above as well as the
rendering.
FILE
.
.
6. The design of the proposed Residentiallnfill Project creates a form and function that
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Yes, the Mediterranean architectural style is very much in keeping with the Floridian landscaping
and design indigenous to this area. Additionally, by upgrading our site, we will hopefully spur
others to redevelop with such a view toward this higher standard, so as to add to the overall
enhancement of the immediate downtown community and the entire City of Clearwater. It is our
intention to contribute to beauty of the upcoming bluff and waterfront redevelopment.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
I ncreasing the building height above the Flexible Standard requirement of 130 feet, to 153 feet
above the street elevation (179 feet height from the median bluff elevation), and front setbacks to
zero feet along the realigned Osceola Avenue, are justified due to the beautiful architectural
design, pleasing configuration of the two tower residential buildings, lush landscaping, maximized
open space, greater open views to the water, 2 levels of underground parking exceeding the 1.25
per unit requirement, and other amenities included in this project. These higher standards will
benefit and enhance the immediate vicinity, and set a higher target for the style and quality of the
bluff and waterfront redevelopment in downtown Clearwater, thus benefiting the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
A
WI
.
CITY OF CLEAKW AA
AFFIDAVIT TO Am110RIZ_~ENT
PLANNING Ie DEVELOPMEN1' SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUlU>ING. 100 SOUIH MYRl1..t ^ VENUTi, r' FLOOk
PHONE m7>-~2~j67 FAX (121) 562.-.:'116
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUHTV OF P1N'Ll.AS
(/4(1.:1
(.
GCOTRe Rahder~/Green COTner Inc,~unset Properties,Morrishi11,
(H_o""I~I'J'--1 Osceola Properties Inc.
Tnc
1. Ihat (I amJwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
,......-- -
. .,1 ,I " ;
, I I J'
r fa f'!,P ,
ADDRESS OR GENER"L LOCATION:
312.314,400 Ii. 404 _ Osceola Ave
(5J!
2, That this property constitutes the property for which a request for II:
Residential Development
7
(N...... 0' "",uoal)
3. That the undersigned (has/hav!!) appointed end (does/do) appoint_
Richard Trela of Osceola Bay Development LLC
... ~ qMl(o) lD -1fIY poUlIons or _ lIl>cuoMfIlo n..-y \0 II"-c:t ouctl pdlI..;
4, That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
~(~)~
SIGN II'''''' o.ww)
George Rahdert
ndersigned authority. hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
I fJ AJ4r.~ STATE Of' FLORIDA, COUNTY ~F PINELLAS
, Swum Cfnd III~bed before me this I t -It... day of
ti I'L L '/<.-t.l.'l . A.O.. ...:Jb,,'i.lto me Mll'ln'
by oJ , who ~ pc~nallt
knowIIllu Ph,d~~
1,114""'ltl,..ti.pt'L
['~...L
-+11 Jei
SIGNED (P""*,,, 0Wn0r')
SIGNED IPPODelIY OooIIHl
SIGNED (p..,...., 0Wn0r')
~"It". Michelle S White
.f!i:I *My Commission CC773141
,~./ Expires October 19.2002
: . ....; /-~~~ i~ ,:'::::\R\D
U-:~[~}~~~lt0
".---.----
i 0] IE (C [~] %7 IE rr::~
: II
.iru I!
:J . It
L__''
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
~ I "1'( 9 F~L_~~.~\t\' ~_~~: "_
JAN-19-2000 15:02
77%
P.01
.
.
"..
It)::
.
CITY OF CLEARW ATKR
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTJIORTZE AGENT
PLANI\IlNG . Dll:VELOP.MJi:N'r SERVICES ADMlNISTKATlON
WNICJPAL.&VJalS aLu.DING, 100 sotIlll MYJln.E Ilvr,-Wli. r FLOOR
MONti ~~7r~'l4$61 PAX (7Z7) ~-4576
STAT! OF FI.ORI04
CDUNTV M "NnlAS
~aT~o~lo:s Antonios
(N_oIl.. P"lI""IY-)
,. lhll (I am/We are) th9 owner(s) and record title hOlder(s) or the following cJesc:ribed property:
,lJ)DRE$S OR Ol'Nrp.AL LOC"~lOIl
303 Osceola
400-410 Jone"
St't"Qot
2. Th81 thls property conRtitulea the property for which a req\,lMt for ..
Residential Davelopment
(*Ilft 1fI_;
3. Thai the uoderlllgnad (haslNlve) ll!JPQinted and (d06./do\ ~jnt
~ic~a~d Trela ot O,ceola Ray Developme~t LLC,
. ~ 1OO"ll"11O- ..., PIUIio'lI""''' _...~.. -.........,
4. Thet this lIffidevtl nas been executed to indJc:e lhe City of Clurwaler, rlortda to oonaidor and act
on the above descrlb~d propeny;
SiGNED ~ CloiNf)
undersigned authority, hel'8by certify that tM foregoing is true and correct.
IIT^T5 Of FI.OftIDA, COUNTY O);,ljINElL.A8
~I n lu and subWib4ld before me tillS i 'fl'1 dey of
2i~I~ r'L ~ ,A.IJ.~lOb D l\) me IIldlor
br 'n,' '5 'O\?\i~I5?IllI~i&PSonllIY
= h!Jproducecl
entllicalion.
I1G1lEtlI"-'Y 0.....,
'1 \ ~ n
(. i'\J{) ~C\ \ I . QC\ \\ f~
~....
M,-__
IlIlHID (p.-"t o....l
1:D'~t~~~~ iY
!.~nl~1 Ii;
; I I I !,
~--.j I
L________J
,)\ N~NING 2. OEVELOF'f;1(;i'"
SEfi\/!CEt:'
,',':i:;'~""" Barbara G, Barnes
/f"'tb.~). MY COMMISSION # CC746349 EXPIRES
(~,~':~E June 6, 2002
<.r"!... 'J..~'~ BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSuRANCE, INC
~",p,rft"'\
'il\r :.)F ,~: c.:,r-,' \',~
Z:O'd
dtE:'i;O 00-6[-Ui!'C'
--.. & VA.' . LeAR\-\/ATER
..FFIDA VIr TAcn7Jo. A~ENT
PL!.N~1N(; 8l DEVE.LO~ SER Y'I(,.::-;.s Al)MINTSTIlA no,
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUlLD.lNv, 100 SOUTH MYRTU A vr~, 2"' FLcOR
PHONE (727)-561 4567 fAX (721) 562-4S76
/
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
"falcolm Croft
never1.y Croft
(NetN 011" plVperty _IS)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner( s) and record title holder( 5) of the following described property: .
AODRl:!::l~ OR GFNrRAL LOCATION.
301.1-308) Osceola Ave.
2. That this property COnstitufes the property for wllich a request for a:
Residential Development
(N_ DI '1qUQI)
3. That ttle undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint
_._~chard Trela of Osceol~ Bay Tleveloomen.t
t'i ("..~ ~.) to - ."y ~ ar llChet'dOWmllllll necc-v 10 ~, 1I1lCh peI!Ilul:
4. That this affidavit has Deen executed to induce the City of Clearwater, f1orid;;t to consider and QC~
on the above described property;
5.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF tfELLAS
Swo lu and SUbscribed before me Ihis .:20 ~ day ~f
- ,A.O. -~to me lImJ/ol
by N. C..c _ C . who is ~:;on,)lIy
knOolwn his produced ,.oq $;SAJQ ~?'L
as Identlficalion. .:tJ~' <''''1 LA.. L<<'-\..C..f
ereby certify that the foregoing is trllO and correct
SIGNEe (P~ Owl.)
Ma'c". cr~
~
~~verly_~o~
SIQ~l[D ("~ awn.,)
J0'~ie
~io. Sc:SZ-ic (~./'
My~;
-.-.--.-
SIG~EO {P'opootly ~
ALLEN -:-:8E;-:'..:~ST
SOLlCITOi..]
MEOWAY HOUSE
18-22 CANTELUFE ROAD
EAST GR:NSTCAD, \'!. SUSSEX
RH~ 3 38J
Tel: 01342 :::.::: ~ ! / :-:~ 3877
(OX: 30C_~::, ::.~._. ~ ..:.":" :-EAD)
'~ ==,I~I== -- - =: rR
O ~~~'~ \',' i~ o.r
I -.J '---.......~ ,
I I I:
r I'" II I I
I '- I' I
IL._'
I I
~'~,.".\\;t~:J ~ :-i~~'>. E~C';J'.'::: ~t'
s::~:. ~ r,:;
\
- ...,.&. t.&CAK wATER
..FFIDA VIr Ta~ln'RO. A(";ENT
i'LANMN<; 4l VEVELO~ 8m VI\,.::-;S A.J)MINTSTRA TIOl'l.
MVNlClPAL SIiRVlCBS BtJILDlNU. 100 SOU1Ji MYRTLE A VENUE, 2" f"L,C:OR
PHON!: (!27).~2 4$61 .fAX (721) S6Z....S76
!
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY M PINELLAS
"'alcolm Croft
neverly Croft
(NMIe oft.. plVpelty _pa)
1. That (' am/We are) the owner( s) and record title holder( s) of the following described property: .
40DRtllll OR GFNrRAL LOC4TION.
30~-308:0sceola Ave.
2. That thIS property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Residential Development
(N_ 01 requeal)
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint
____-~chard Trela of Osceol~ Bay Develoomen~
.., \~ ~.) to --."y pelIUoIva Dr...... -eIllI --.ylD"".UGtl~.
4 That this affidavit has D89n executed to induce the City of Clearwater, r1orid61 to consider and ac:
on the above described property;
5.
ereby certify that the foregoing is trLle and correct.
STATE Of: FLORIDA, COUNTY OF !teu..A.S
Swg lu and $UbsClibed before me this :J.(J ~ day::)1
. A.O. "'~to me IIIlUIOf
(' ,who is ~liOnally
.s;s a.....wL
~ l'1fj (..(, '-"'-~
SICNED \PIQP8IIy o.-r,
Malcolm CC~
~
~~ v e r 1 y_...:.=:o f t _
SIQN~D 1"1OOellY 0wIwr)
by /'of. C.c
ktlown h.s produeeQ
as Identltic.tion.
J0'~~
~io. S cSl<.c. (kl"" .---
My _.""1;......1 .....;
SIG"lEO (P'~ 0Mler)
ALLEN -:-~8E;-::'.'nST
SOLlCITOi..J
MEDWAY HOUSE
18-22 CANTELUFE ROAD
EAST GRiNSTeAD. \'1. SUSSEX
RH~:J 3BJ
Tel: 01342 ::::.::::! I ::~j877
(OX, ~'"'- ... r-
. .......,...,-- ~ -. .-. ~ ..:.':" :-EAD)
;-;~..":.".~~;~~,,3 ~ ~;~;.E~~;")'''~'.'
s---
.. ....
. ........ .
....I/.6.../....L.J(,.o(,J
..--......- --..
J..,!-~.O
(,l. "''')L'+~IO f1...~~ PAGE 02
. ~~O~~~r.:tI~ENT
PLANNING" DEVJtLOfMENT SEaVICIS ADMINJS'IRATlON
MIDlICPAI. SElt.YlalS 'IUIl.DINO. 100 soutH MnnJi A YIlHU1!. 2- FLOOR
fRONS (72'7)-$6"'''7 FAX (727) 562-45'7'
.TATI M FLORIDA
COUN'I'V OF f*1Neu.M
C Cl r; ..::iA- f1 (-t..r ; () t-J
(tMIM"'M ~-l
1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(l) and record titl. hOldar(l) of the following d..erlb4td property:
4ODltUIOllGlNEAAU.OCATlOfl: 3D I n S(t/oLA ~\Je..
C\eo.4U~. Hd2uCYJ , ~ 3 7 ~S-
2. That thia property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
~...QS\ 0 Q,.rtiAt... OeLJf2..lotPr'ne~T
(,...",~
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint
~ 1c..hAllO tfZ.€l,A ~ OSchtA ~ D~oPWlc..IoJ-r-.
.. IhllllMlfl..,.I') to -... .....,...,.. .,..............."to..,......~:
4. That thil atfIdevit has been executed to induct the City of Cle8fW8ter, Florida to conaidet and ad
on thII .boy. described property;
5. Tp., (1Iw.~. the u~~ned a~. hereby certify that the foregoing il true and correct.
L ~ ~PLOIUDA.COUNTYOf'lNEU.AI
IIGNU! I""""'" 0Mw) Swotn '0 and tlefoN me tt11s /' d.y of
"- . A.D.. '1 to me .nCllor
by , wIIO It ptrsondy
IIGNUJ (1'ftIpefty CMMt) IlnOWn lIaS PI'OCkIced
..ldentlftCMion.
_ED (J'MiIIMV ClwnwJ
/.
.....
.....
//
SIQ:...il:l P"1'CIpMy ow..-J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
SUBSCR!AE AND SWORN TO ME
T:i.~Oti~
,
NOTARY PUBLIC
:r""""""""'H""""""""""~
! ',-' SANDRA K. FARNHAM ~
-. COMM.1241871 "'"
~ ...,. . NOTARY PUBlIC - CAUFORNIA -
- SANTA CLARA COUNTY !""
rO'd
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
d~f\Vl9E3b-17r -..Aew
CITY OF CLEARWATER
~5/15/2~00 11:D~
c.
55051083
('-.
GRA"ISI)~:
r='AGE
'212
May 12. 2000.
To Whom it may concem:
I live the immediate surrounding area of the Osceola Bay Development.
The upgrading and beautification of the area along Clearwater Harbor will
enhance our city revitalization project and make Clearwater a more valued place
to live,
I am in favor of lhe Osceola B~y Development project.
llive at C Q) 500 JJO/LTU 0\' t t"O~.i, Clearwater, Fl.
A~ #' i II \'H().lJc~ ~ L Y03 I
c ~')->l U~. ~
CLARISSE MESHOUlAM
20.d
dvE:ZO Oo-sr ^e~
~5115/20BO 11:~5
56E'l~1 08.
oJF' ~ \"'SlJl'~
.
F'A':..E. I)::::
May 12,2000.
To Whom It may concern:
I live the immediate surrounding area of the Osceol. Bay Development.
The upgrading and beautiftcation of the area along Clearwater Harbor will
enhance our city revitalization project and make Clearwater a more valued place
to live.
I am in favor of the Osceoia Bay Development projeot.
I live at..j ia III {j, <~ '1:1 t.Jl ' Clearwater, FI.
.....
EO-d
d17E : ZO 00 - 5 t -"'VIII
170'd
P'"..~~
t.
8/-'#UH;Yt. 91+.
500 N. O~ Av.. Suite 81'
C1earwa_. FIOIida 33755
PH: (813) 442.7726
Fax: (813) 442-1964
.
15 May, 2000
To Whom It May Concern:
I am in favor of the new luxury condo project as set forth lll1d plaMed by Osceola Bay
Development.
1 live at 500 N. Osceola Avene\le.l have lived at this location for fO\lrteen years.
J wish it were nol so but the neighborhood in which I live and in which I plan to
continue to live in is quite run down. Many of the bouses and their sun'ouDding trees,
gUlss ete are not kept lip. Waste is a!lowed to collect. Above the 300 building and to the
500 building on the west side is one oC11le most neglected sections ofNonh Osceola.
Osceola Bay Development and its cwrent project will begin a badly needed upgrade. I
am hopeful that its excellent standards and aesthetics will kick off an entire
redcw:lopmllnt of the whole Nonh Osceola Avenue and North Fort Harrison Avenue
areas SO lhat in teo years we will see that a major improvement in this section of
Clcllrwater has come !lbout.
All by itself the new condominium buildings and the care with which they Ire to be
eonslructcd RDd the beauLY of their sUITO\mdings, pools. etc will brighten things up alot
and increase everyone's values in the sUlfOunding areas.
Sincerely,
-~~1
Ellie Bolger
d9~:20 OO-gt-^~W
good
'c.~ 4~ 1005
\.
.
May 12, 2000
Mr. Rich Trela
Developer
Osceola Bay Development
Dear Mr. Trela,
On behalf of the Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association I
would like to express to you our approval ofthe revised plans for
your project which include leaving the existing northbound only
Osceola Street that can be utilized by the entire neighhorhood. We
understand the location win be altered somewhat. however, it does
not appear that move should change the purposes for which the
road is used.
'Ille Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association appreciates
your efforts to work with our neighborhood on this project and
would welcome the opportunity to provide whatever assistance we
can provide to make the project a success.
Sincerely,
~m7lL
Vice President
Old Clearwater Bay
Neighborhood Assn.
P.OI
d9E;:ZO OO-g'[-^1!W
-' _ . n-E; SALVRTlrn MMY
6
THE SALVATION ARMY
~l/J.U4S.DMlUe"
162S North BcIcbcr Roul3376S
1'.0. 110" 80'10. CIoMwa=. PL 3)7,...070
PhcJ.. (727) m.9m . FAX (127) 12$.9149
7;:77259749
..
~.u/~.::
11AY-10-::!C3eC 12: 0El
Jolul Gowan.
G_,dI
Raymolld A. Cooptf
Tenitoritll COffUM~'
Ll. CoIonlll Donald Faulkner
DiWljOlrllI C~,
Majon Jobn and Marthal)'1l Needham
Carps Olfrcers
ADVISORY BOARD
omCDS May 10,2000
~..
Ollt M. Let
Vice CUi......
~ftll E. ....rey
n-_
1011'" L ll-n
s.c...."
M... R_ WvrII
ADVISORY BO"IIO
WDlJ!J\S
Artllu D, DIcUl.....
F_d Dln.-Jh
Olllcl w. 1'i""P~
SoIl, H. FOUlo
IoU H, GIlIlaln
Willi_ E. Hole, M.D.
Uu R. HIIII8IOCIl
ClftllYII D.",* Hill
,~r;._...
Will.... G. J_
Hey", \.. I(juody
Oark l\(, LI'
Camll:. I..uw",y
Gilbat B. McMlnrr
MtJ, FraU Mwplly
Mr. DoNld NO_Ill
llIlIy I'ary
WlIler Powell
Ja. Nlal",
c.....w. Sllllord
Let 8, So....
O. ~llcs n-trr
J_ S. ..""'.
~Wi'-
un MEMBB$
b"""A.......o\I
Gearp NaDclr7
MI1 aallcrl \llo\mI
90.d
Mr. Rich Trella
Osceola Properties
100 Pierce Street #1101
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Via U.S. Mailll!ld via f8c&imilemaillO 727-461-0670
Re; CIII,1b1 DeveloDmntl. Nortl Fort Harrisoa
Dear Rich.
This letter follows our meetiDg last week TO review pllllli for our rcapcctivc: Capital
Developments in the area between NOrth Fort Harrison and the Intercoastal Waterway.
Your project seems to have DO adverse effect upon our current opera1iOft, 110t do we feel
that the project which we propose will have any IIdvcne etrect on what you are planning
to accomplish.
I am particularly glad that you were able to resolve tho issue of the vacation ofOsccola
Street by simply straishtenina out the atreet.
We certainly do W3nt to be good neighbors and work together for the common good.
Look forward to future discussions as our respective projects develop.
SiD&:<<ely,
LJl:~~
CORPSOFFlCER
lIN/jmC
TOT~ f).02
d9~:ZO 00-9I-^~W
.
tarwater, 20 May 2000
To:
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services Director
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748 - Clearwater FL 33758 - 4748
From:
Joe Pereira
500 N. Osceola Ave # 804
Clearwater, Fl33755
~.'<':';';"':';"\ i~=~.i (;~,l r;='~--; ;-.,
jr'''}\l~~~IJt,
~l=-' I '
,
; n l!-,' nr(;n
j ""'_'1,j 7 LLluu
i
I;
Ii .
I! i
t,_wr-Ji'"
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Notice of Public hearing CDB 00-11/ FL 00-01-03 - Notice of Objection
As an interested party in public hearing CDB 001-11/FL 00-01-03 I object to all 3 requests
by Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
This project is too big, too high, too close to the water and too dense in comparison with
the neighborhood around it.
It is also too close to our building and specially the south side apartments will lose much in
quality of life and also value.
Such a tall building destroys the aesthetics and "look and feel" of downtown
Clearwater.
The reason Paris is such a beautiful city is that (besides the Eiffel Tower and Montparnasse
Tower) all buildings are not taller than 7 floors.
The same is true for Washington DC.
Clearwater is an underbuilt city and there is enough space to develop so downtown doesn't
need a pocket of such high density and tall buildings that would destroy the harmony of the
neighborhood.
Anything more than half the projected number of units would be too big for the area.
Clearwater is not New York and we do not want it to become anything like it.
1. Increase in height from 30 ft to 179 ft
AI The planned IS-story high-rise will obstruct the view of all South Apartments in
Osceola 500 plus take a lot of light and sun away from those apartments (sunshine only
until 11 am).
B/ It will also cause that our swimming pool facing west will be in the shade in the
morning at least in high season, which is winter.
C/ The planned exit to t. parking garage and their trash storage I also be directly in
front of the apartments facing south in 500 No Osceola Avenue. With 130 planned units
this will be a lot of additional traffic, additional exhaust fumes and additional noise (see
also 5a).
2. Increase in density.
Increase in density will break the harmony of the neighborhood and concentrate too many
apartments and people in a too small area with very little space for vegetation.
3. Vacation of North Osceola Ave right-of-way from Jones St. to Georgia S1.
The proposed shutting off of Osceola between Jones and Georgia leaves Georgia as the
only access to 500 North Osceola, this is unacceptable because:
a) 130 units in the new development plus 100 units in 500 N. Osecola.exit through Georgia
onto N Fort Harrison. They need to turn either right or left there, Ifthere is a gap in the
busy traffic going North and South on Fort Harrison - this could cause build ups in Georgia
(which is very short) and even build ups in the planned underground garage as well as the
car park of 500 N. Osecola, which means even more noise and more pollution for the hole
500 building and specially the south facing apartments.
b) Additionally to the above we have Georgia as the only Entrance point ( access) to and
exit from the 500 Building plus all buildings and houses further north on N. Osceola.
Which means heavy traffic going both ways through a Georgia "Bottleneck" (between N.
Osceola and Fort Harrison)
c) Trying to access the 500 Building (and houses further north), the owners of500 N
Osceola (and other people wanting access to North Osceola) have to turn left into Georgia.
This is the ONLY access then to 500 N. Osceola. It can only be done IF there is a gap in
the traffic coming from the North.
As Fort Harrison is extremely busy, especially at peak times and on weekends, with people
going to the beaches, the cars wanting to turn left into Georgia will build up and this will
become a very dangerous spot -'with accidents likely to occur.
At the same time people wanting to turn LEFT ONTO Ft. Harrison, coming out of
Georgia, have to wait for the same gap in traffic!!
4. All these points directly affect the entire neighborhood and specially 500 N. Osceola and
most particularly affects all South-facing units in the 500 building, reducing their view and
light, increasing noise and pollution thus reducing their value and quality of living
considerably.
Thank you for your attention.
,
~
Ilj
HARVARD
JOllY
ClEES
TOPPE
AR':liITECTS. ~A
1\ I A
01 (I:~t~,;.,
K. ~..,h,. (I,.~',:. AJA
J':lf"'iIUj"bbl<, ^'II
~Jill~rn U. l'IOlN.lIrt, AlA
S.,~.""-,,rl M. .!'1Ciiiicr, AlA
ftJ~Jlc.:n.fJ'd k:. Joll~, NA
I~N"C'~ A. ~hil~~('. NA
It.>lI~tlMl R. T()I~:. .I!...
2714 NlIlth $1, N.
St. PafarsOvrg, Fl
33704
.
727/896 4611
AA COOO1l'i
.
.
Fll ~ COpy
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
June 7, 2000
TO:
Ms. Lisa Fierce, Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
FROM:
William B. Harvard, Jr., AlA, NeARB
President
Harvard Jolly Clees Toppe Architects, P.A., AlA
RE: Osceola Bay Club
I've reviewed the revised renderings and elevations received via e-mail from
Richard Trella and have the following comments:
y The softer colors are an improvement, the lighter the better, but I don't have
any objection to some tone.
~ The roof shapes are improved.
~ The curved walls have more relief.
) I can't review the building height.
I'll be out of town Thursday and in for only a short time on Friday. Please leave me
a voice mail and I can respond.
WBHjr/dar
w;\harvard\flerce memo 01.doc
"
.
HARVARD
JOllY
ClEES
TO P P E
ARCHITECTS, PA.
A I A
Directors
R. lohn Clees, AlA
Jeffrey E. Cobble. AlA
William B. Harvard, AlA
Steven M. Heiser. AlA
Blanchard E.lolly, AlA
James A. Shawhan, AlA
Jonathan R. Tappe, AlA
2714 Ninth 51. N.
51. Petersburg, Fl
3 3 704
727/896 4611
AA COOO1l9
..
~Ilf COpy
June 2, 2000
i, '~) \. U~; ~/7 I,
i: ;".- r~~~-~'~~."-'-'u,-"
IU' ..~.
I, . I-
i' 7 ?OiJi! IL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT I
SER~CES /
CITY OF CLEARWATER I
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Osceola Bay Club
Dear Ms. Fierce:
At your request and as a follow-up to our May 25th memo requesting additional
information and comments on the design for the above referenced project, we have
contacted the architect, Robert Heiser, with DCSW Architects, and have also been
contacted by Richard Trella with the following verbal responses:
o The Architect will provide the mix and apartment sizes, however, final plans have
not been completed and the multiple unit styles have not been finalized. This
information is adequate, and will allow us to evaluate the density and amount of
common space.
o The rationale for having 12' floor to floors on the upper stories is basically a
marketing and financial decision for increasing the value of those units. This
evaluation, we believe, should be performed by your office.
o The elevation and sections of the balcony and the railings were explained and
we believe that, with his clarifications, the design will be satisfactory.
o The comments regarding the curved wall on the NE and SE corners of the
towers were discussed in detail with the architect and it appears that, because
of the schematic nature of the plan development, it is the intention to articulate
those walls with additional openings for balconies that we believe will soften and
be less intrusive mass in the neighborhood.
o The comment regarding the differences in the elevations of the buildings was
discussed and it is our understanding that there will be some unification of the
building elevations to provide for a more cohesive design.
o The request for the over-height structure was discussed with the architect and
the ordinance was not fully understood by Mr. Heiser or myself, however, in a
subsequent phone call conversation with Richard Trella, it was my
understanding that this height variance will not be requested and that
.
.
modification of the building to eliminate the loft design is being incorporated into
revised plans.
o The terra cotta color suggestion to be introduced on other elevations was
discussed with the architect and I believe it will be favorably considered.
o The clay tile roofs were discussed and it is believed that the developer desires
to maintain this design feature, however, we suggested to Mr. Trella that the
design of the roofs be modified to consolidate the forms and not have separate
planes creating a disjointed appearance.
o Mr. Trella discussed with me the request for a 7' variance due to the parking
garage. This is not a matter that I was fully aware of and I suggested that he
discuss this in detail with your office.
Submitted by:
~
William B. Harvard, Jr., AlA, NCARB
President
HARVARD JOllY ClEES TOPPE ARCHITECTS, P.A., AlA
WBHjr/dar
w:\harvard\fierce Itr 01.doc
1
~
NORTH
· Aerial Map ~~~tC~~~~ O'
Malcolm Cra4 George Radd~ & Anoth~ ljlfa:!.~opp. dv~~
400 Jones Street I J-~' \ I APR' 8 2{XX) i J
FLOO-Ol-03 \ \ i \ ...-/
, I
~ "j.
t~;;;~
~~~jl
'\.~#l
\..'toirER ,;;.r'~
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
~
NDRTH
1320'
Location Map
Malcolm Craft; George Raddart; & Anothy Markoupdous
400 Jones Street
FLoo-Ol-03
~
Ai
t!
~
[;1Jfj w GRANr8; ST 1"0
::t ! :rA~ ill~D D~D~ ST I ~
:; } 'LJ': :> CARLTON il!, ST ,<;( RUSSELL ST
I V) ENGMAN ERs4rINE c;D~D<':> TANGERINE :>ST~ ~
G'UD ~ 1NGMAN 'ST '3"
01:: Bf~(l gD D I l~ t.')
..... D:: LA SALLE ST 0:: ~
PALM BlU,," PALM BLUFF ST !OODJ 'pALM ~L~UFFD~T I~ '"
SPRING!]!]! sr JURGENS ST !Q "~ 3
'-J c::::J ~z tn is If)
~O ~li'~ ~ ~ ~
~ORD 5T "MOOD c:=J D
[}O ErD
SEMINOLE 5T
lao / #// I 0 c:=J D~I
"<{ ~ ELDRIDGE ST
q~ l,rnJi~ .'ii!, c::J =
~]: AA"~'~ D'B :'::"1 ~.~' < ,
~ JONES D~Q D [;D!D~D~D~
o 0 DIIJ 0 ~~D CJ D ~ :> ~ " :0
~D D ~:D D D~DSb~9~ ~>n{]~
V) ~ ~~~DHEN~ 0 LnJ CJ ~~ ~
~ LO ~i D croiD rs~ I D"!
~[]gD~D ~ 0 D~qK I CLE:LAND I D~D ST 0
:tl ~ ~ODr----l D:>D~D 0 ~
?, PIERCE ST:r!;l'~" "
~D DtD<':>,~ 0 Og~5T ~~~Oin ,[?<yCJ'
COURT ST [] I ~I 0 D:g ~ ~ G~ULD ~ ST ~
\l~DM1?cEY~ 0 OCOURT R'['\\ ~ 5c::=J r=J ~A
\j D~ U ~~L-J
o D~D ;RDGER5 ~ESTNUTI D 0 CJ I COURT ST I
o ~ I D I TURNER I ST
PINE PINE 5T
PALMETTO
~
~
i
0-
v
,tlll'~~;7::-",,__
/<J'~-< 0"'2\
, ,\11,- ....
~~..... s~
~~ --::::.... ~~
\.-~~.q"'fR 5~~l\
"'''....'",''''''
C::J
ROGERS
C=:J~
'"
CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
PUBUC WORKS ADM1N1STRATlON
ENGINEERING
\ /'5 'ti ~ ~ ~ ~ /.." c, 0 ~ ~ A~.. l
60-87 V ~ ., ., ., '" ., 700/ J"l ~ "l~ 700 :il:; :il II:;:il 700 <0 701~ ~
_________ '" ELDRIDGE &. STREET
:=-======_.-L~l Q~I~~I~I~;I:I~l4, /611 12 j13 610 /~5 h71~~24f5/~25~ 610
_________ ~ 2 608/ /.0' 11/'4 608/ /80' 23 26131608
+ G . 3 L . 606 I RID /W I Ii' J. L -.:
f- - - - - - - - _ /eO"" ~<n6J 1 ..1:601;' 2;["" 27~ 606
_ _ _ _ _ + 1\ If 4"h0<1: ~605 9 . ~'660' / .fi05 21 28 60.
It -90VT::2: ~".-. =-;'00 ~ 603 I ~1 ~o 1 - 4 629
LOT 4 ~--,.. 6 7 18 ~a 1. .d.R
---- --- "'""--I~HARR[NGTON512 t6::3 8 600 601 I~ l'
9 ~ 509 'NICMQ:;o~ 9
11 5-77 510 \ 511 7
_ ______ N 50B It'60'9 570 507 2 &." 8 510
}1507 ~ SLO N "-
HARBOR BLUFFS ~ \ 6 5~8 ~ ' 3 6506
WATERFRONT ~ 50t :os ~ ~ 4 1 38 5 ~
CONDO . ~ \502
21-31 % HARTS 1~2ND 1
50021 501 ~'f1 00
~'=' =====_ - ~ GEORGIA STRE~~'::~ ;;: 33 ~ I;;;
__.; g 4
B 40e 40 407 7 U6 >
~ 1 405 6 ~I 3-47
1-_______ ""'--c....,... YT n lr.l 6 0 403 7 ~ 5 2
J U"'".lI I~... 2402 ~g'I..__'0 0
_ 401 8 - .... _
Z 111'" ...: 4.3 ~ ~:&~
_______ z '-J 400 c5 401 400 % HART!;;
F- 43/04 3r tj 311 310 32'~2~ "'.. .,
~------- (/) 19 ~ i, c ~ () 10
o 308 ~1~}u' 10_
- ;....,. 43/06 ~., ~'ID :Z 43/03 i! 31744/029 8 7 8
-------- A LUTZ - 0 30. .3f6;, '(3) 5
"--------- ~35-76
""00-
-.
BELVEDERE APTS
. CO-OP UNREC
. soo
7L 2 D B-
I? "
~.ll! Nr< a1~~
'5 11~-11 ""'"
300
40
305
f---"::- 3
f101 2
1 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I 0
<
...J
o
~ 22'
~ VI
o
)t
10:;'l~ ~' DR~_4" ~_F-:G _~
1026-2 149D-557 12/07 '28
1415-238 920~-625
~~~~=~4 ·
1,1ll::_01_2'
.....,~ L.S 1161 I
,.,,- COACHMAN PARK I MAIN U8RAW~
~""_ j,/;JID'FORD & SMOYER 4 .1011'i" 961-
~ 101 1\ ~2 \V 347
W I" 1396-575 lL) 4119-1313 36
Iv) ~ 4488 1864
i / I'I i I
, I
~~~~~~~ ~ ~
,..<"c
C=<"<"TI
1Z~ ... JJ...
! 10 9. 8 @ 7~
,
. 2
0,.,.; ,:2
13 ~2'"
52 ~ 3
::;
_Wx 1740'l-'37.
z
AYDEN
43/07
4
H6-
~
2DO
'__'7')
5 '''~.)oI
l1eO-2>>
12/06 ~
12/05
12/01
w
::> 12/04
~121
<
118
10 r.
\.:
3
...~
vei'"' 4
<
c5
w
u
VI
o
12/03
~
..
..
/
5 1A1f~36~
~~
~~
34
6"
d2.
""fa
~[lt
604 1J
33
f---
32
--
60131
~
801
513 19
~G -"
50.c::i :,8
w 507~7..
::>=t6M
~ 05 (?\ =5
<~ "'"6
~ 7iJ
~ 8.
403 12 -g-
~,~
~t-
:;;
z ~., '"
w 00 '"
'" ..., '"
0:: 30.
<
u 8 dJ 6
307
. ~
2 ~
1 d NES 3 B-.
" 0
, u
iQ 0
..
o
'"
8
6
7 __
@1 22-3:-
3~
:
60
133 1
6
2
124
5 122
'20
~ 11/01
, l;i-iJ
1 ~
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OWNER: Malcolm Craft, George Raddart, & Anothy Markoupdous I CASE FLOO-Ol-03
ADDRESS: 400 Jones Street I ZONING HRD
ATLAS PAGE: 2776 I SEC: 9 I TWP: 29S I RANG I: 15E
COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT BOARD
Var 00-3.dwg
Prepared by; E.A.- Public Works Administration
___ \ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /" "C:, "w ~ ~~ l
60-87 ~., ., ., ., '" ., 700/ )~ ~ ~~ 700 ~:;< ~ II~;, 700 <0 701g ~
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -&. ELDRIDGE .., STREET
----------lg] ~~I~I~[~I~;;~tJ /611 12J13 610/55 / ~~24~ ~25~
--_______ i~ 1!11 "'610
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + 2 608/ /.09 11/14 608 I 1609 23 26 L5I 608
'- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + G . 3 L . 606 1 kl? I q,oJW J.of' 2} L 213 60e
________ + 1'-11 4fio. re05 9l1660.1 ].0. 21 28 60'
I ~ ~OYT JRT-l f--,..1.'" ~OO a:~03 8/17602/ J 201 - 4 629
GOYT LOT 44----0> 6 7 18 1 ..4.H 3
----____ 601" 600 601 19 1""'" T
~ "'?' HARRINGTON512\ "3 8 ...~"'~ ...
5 77 \ 9 ~ 5091NICH LSOI'l 9
11 - 510 5"
508 609 7 510 507 2 & m 8 510
\11"7 5 ~ 3 SLO N 7........
HARBOR BLUFFS ~ 6 608 r 6606
WATERFRONT ~ 60; r ~ 4 1 38 5 ~
CONDO Z 604 HARTS IR 2ND
21-31 600 2 1 50' 2 ~ 1 .00
-------__ 40,--~ ~09 f"3') /II~
_________ ~ GEORGIA STREET _ ~ 407 3 ~ ~ 4 404
B 40c4040?7J6 >
_ 1 405 6 .
'-_______ '"'---1---,. YT -n:l~ 6 0 4037 :1 3547402
J .L..l""V :J~... ~ 9g,/ 10400
11 r " -< 4 3 401 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'---______ Z \",) 40 a 401 400 ...J... HART g
________ ~ 43/04 31 ~ 311 310 S2'-.l2~:g ~ ~ fj ~~ ~
o 308 ~ ~.~~.. II) -;~ ~ 30S
- f,.... 43/06 "'.. ~3/0 Z 43/03 317 9 B 7 6 Cl 8 7
________ g " 309 306 ~ 44/021".~ I""
A LUTZ (3) 305 307 ("')
________ ~35-76,". ~..;-, B:;
~O, 1Tl 2 ~f;: :;::s '"
BELVEDERE APTS c- -'lJ N 0:0.. '"
. Co- OP UNREC ~ f 1"-11 ~ iiio::. 300
. 90040....._
305 _3~
301 2 3 4 300
1 " ~ 5
~ .. w w ~
;;; w '"
'" '"
:i:
..~r :m.-,
ZZ5
I 0
/1
~
0
- W 221
U
1I1
, 0
z
;~~~~~~~ e
, 2
e en,:g
r5 5;2\0
S2 ~ 3
4
H6-
..
~
10 9
~ '.
200 ~ 1 1212
3 ~ 201 ....
55 ~ ~
_V<xp401-n74
iHA YDEN
43/07
zoo
10;:.1/1 t2 DR~_.,,:i5 _I=-:G - ~
1026-207 08 1490--557 12/07'28
1415-238 9205-625
~~:~=~~4. 12/08 htt~~~~
...., 11JOQ LS ~1 I
w~ COACHMAN PARK IM~NU~A~
~ ,,_ /,1 JEFFORD & SMOYER 4 1011'i" 96'
:i:- 101" ~ \V 347
~ r 1396-575 l2) 4119 1313 36
"J ~ .4488 1864
Ii I ! I
'"
'"
5 :::: 12/05 ~
STREET
r--
55 1 35
~.
127 2 ~
~~~
19 4 0::
~~
1~~7 5 3=
1'056
12/05
128
12/01 126
w
::> 12/04
~ 127
<
118
<
a
w
u
1I1
o
12/03
B@ 7]\:r: 8
:r 0
3 41. 5 ~ ~ 1 21
I 200 ~2l),H-i1
a I 50' I ~
S.R. 590
8
9
10 d'\ 5 124
122
120
, 2
:.s>
c,c~4 1
,
c
'"
/
50 0::)360
~~
~~
34
611
=..R
60S8
6~A ~ If
:![(
604 ))
33
32
60131
~
~7 g<1 ~
513 19
~i9c::i18 '\
w'07 17 W r--
~ o~ ~ L-
~f!!3-,'i jr;5
~ 6
.01!t:'4 ,II
405;:S13 H-
8
403 12 '---g -
11:~ ,~
601
6
. ~
2 :l
1 -
~ DN~S3~
~ ~ ~
6
7 -_
@1 22-3;-
Yo<
3~
7
60
138 1
6
2
~ 11/01
~ 115 4
~TJ
I
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT R.EQUEST
OWNER: Malcolm Craft, George Raddart, & Anothy Markoupdous I CASE FLOO- 01- 03
!
ADDRESS; 400 Jones Street I ZONING HRD
ATLAS PAGE: 277B I SEC: 9 I TWP: 29S I RANGE: 15E
COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT BOAR.D
VarOO-3.dwg
Prepared by: EA- Public Works Administration
V I. / "j
_ -L _ ELDRIDGE
=-=======-1. U II I ~ r \
---------
~--------~ /1 I
-________ + / / I
--- + II 1--.
.,'\1' I /
~ fo.l(1'" \ \ /
:--~-~--- ~ ;'" \ l -
\~\ -
~ \1' ~ ~
zrol ~
,
/
STREET
/ I
/ I
7 J
7J
[5J
.---
'-->-- ~ I---
f--l---
d"'oo.
~5
~~
~'fi
7 =i~
'"\
'\.
~
\-
,
I
~------- -
e--_______
~ '-7-
f--------__
J
GEORGIA
L--L--
STREET
-Ul
- -~..
~ I~o.~-"'\I
""
~- =i
z ~
~
.
Z
-------- ~
-'-'"
--------
1---------
HART
~
~O\e
~ T
I
L-_ !
<
-'
0 ~O\e\
""
u
en
0 ,
z
_:..~~ :\l fC !ff'o'lo'
fo.o(f" Sl ~v.
~--------' -
_______ / ~+5
/
...~r "'mOl
.
J ~-
~
:r
I-
It: 1
0 ~
Z [
~
l/i'DREW 1-----
I ~ ""
i ::l
Z
I ~
<
I ~/ ~
t! <
I 0
/ I i I I -'
0
""
u
I en
0
I
:~~
,:'" [2J r
I Jf!
STREET .-- / S.R. 590
~~
--" ~
=-=- z
-~
-~
<
_30
-
-
z
""
o
It:
<
Cl
u
I
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
OWNEIl: Malcolm Craft, George Raddort, & Anothy Markoupdous I CASE FLOO- 01- 03
ADDIlESS: 400 Jones Street I ZONING HDR
ATLAS PAGE: 2778 I SIC: 9 I TWP: 29S JIANGE: 15E
COMMUNITY DEVELOMENT BOARD
Var 00-3.dwg
Prepared by EA- Public Works Administration
. CITY OF CLEAPr.TER
Al'PLICATION FOR SITE, pLAN APPROVAL
PLANNING &: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTlUTION
MUNICIPAL SERVICEs BUJLD~9 100 SOUTH MYR'I'LB A~ Z- FLOOR'
PHONE \1Tl)-S62J,S(jJ FAX m:n S62~6
ThIs fam ~"blt submitI8d trail ~ far .......... -. .... -, -. n.o......... -. fIInces,
SIgns. W!Sfed righIs. del. . ~ .1Ql........ _ Ills. dodls. ,... and aIw......1IlruciJI8s _ home .,.,...~
APPUCANT, PROPt:KJ T OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPUCANT MAIlE
~ADDRESS
PHONE taJllBER
~. T OWNERS
AGENTNAIE
IIAIUNG ADDRE5S
PHONE NUIIBER
......
"llC
- .
100 Pi Pl"ce Street, 'Suite --1101 Clearwater ,
-
33755'
(727) 804-1417
r---. _
FAX"- :
. .
Contract for Sal from:.
(Ustal~)
Anthon bus
anq
Kenneth H.l\Qush P.E.
~
Service_s Inc. 304 S. Belcher Rd. Clwr FL .33765 ~
-
FAXNLIotBER: (727) 446-80~6.: 0
: (727) 443-2869
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
, j'/J,(j 1': I L t
511cCS::J ADDRESS: 0 Between 300 -500 Osceola Avenue ..1 J vtJ'j1J5 ~-:;:": ~{J-
. "0 I
LEGAL ~IIOIC: See Attached
PAReS. HUIIBER:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
SIZE OF srTE:
09/29/15 000b0 430 OSOO'and oth s
(fJD .
~_Conde units ....' ' '
(~ at~ ....... Il5Pt raams or squaN 1aa&ag8 at
3.27 ac;:es ,
I. the un~ acknawtedge that aD
represehtatblS made in'this appIIcatfan
are true and accurateota"1he best at my
1cnowtedga7
o~~'
SlanaU1t at praperty aM.- or .._atilt..
?::;
l
f:i': "'--S..~'f
-- ...
a-. _=-_
_ __:-~.J
;.
t..:
'\1
""
~
l0J
'I
"J
"^'
Roan ROush
. Commf..." QQ ''76910
-,.. Oet. J. 200
FOR PlANNING OFRCI: USE ONLY: · ...
LMD USE DeS...... OF PARCEL; ZCNING: I-Ib R- FVTURE ~lDI: c.Dt3
ZONING ClASSIACATION OF ADJACBfT PARCaS: ~ H D cz.. sount D EAST: HJ)!( (" WEST: H..,J.,,,,""
RJT1.JRE LAND USE ClASSIRCAllONOQF ACJACelT PARCa.S: NORTH: 0 c1)P;' =-sa1nt ~r. ~ WEST: ~
~
,
l'\J
~
v:.
-L
~
.
.
RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS CRITERIA
for OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
Updated April 18, 2000
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise
economically impractical without deviation from the intensity and development standards.
Due to the high cost of land and construction to create the aesthetically outstanding buildings and
maximize the open views of the Bay and Gulf, the configuration of the 2 towers with extensive
green area and landscaping have been designed to enhance this unique site on the bluff
overlooking Clearwater Bay.
It is not practical to build less than 163 units. This number of proposed units does not exceed the
169.5 units allowed per the 1993 Periphery Plan (50 units per acre) for this area. Therefore, in
order to maximize the open views to the water, the height of 153 feet above street elevation (169
feet from the median bluff elevation plus 10 feet for the penthouse terrace) is necessary for the 2
towers, with setbacks from the realigned Osceola Avenue right of way to the new pavement of
less than 15 feet in the front.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residentiallnfill Project
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The entire development, from the landscaped, gated entry with a security guard, to the 2
swimming pools with decks and steps overlooking the water, is designed to raise the value not
only of this site, but also of its surroundings. This is due to the quality and aesthetics of the
design of this project.
The approximate proposed value with the new structures, landscaping and amenities will be
about $75 million.
3. The uses within the Residentiallnfill Project are otherwise permitted in the district.
Attached dwellings are permitted in the land use for this district. A social area, parking below
grade, tennis courts and pools are also included in the development.
4. The uses within the Residentiallnfill Project are compatible with adjacent lands uses.
Yes, they are compatible with the adjacent land use. The adjacent lands to the north and south
comprise multi-family developments along with their amenities. The adjacent land to the east is
owned and used by a religious organization.
5. The development of the parcel(s) proposed for development as a Residentiallnfill Project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Yes, the Mediterranean architectural design, landscaping and parking exceeding the code
requirements, use of higher quality materials in the structure and architectural details, the removal
of the huge dogleg from the Osceola Avenue right of way, and the visual aesthetics of this
project, all combine to vastly upgrade the immediate vicinity. Also see #2 above as well as the
rendering.
I
!f!f.~~~
.
.
6. The design of the proposed Residentiallnfill Project creates a form and function that
enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Yes, the Mediterranean architectural style is very much in keeping with the Floridian landscaping
and design indigenous to this area. Additionally, by upgrading our site, we will hopefully spur
others to redevelop with such a view toward this higher standard, so as to add to the overall
enhancement of the immediate downtown community and the entire City of Clearwater. It is our
intention to contribute to beauty of the upcoming bluff and waterfront redevelopment.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Increasing the building height above the Flexible Standard requirement of 130 feet, to 153 feet
above the street elevation (179 feet height from the median bluff elevation), and front setbacks to
zero feet along the realigned Osceola Avenue, are justified due to the beautiful architectural
design, pleasing configuration of the two tower residential buildings, lush landscaping, maximized
open space, greater open views to the water, 2 levels of underground parking exceeding the 1.25
per unit requirement, and other amenities included in this project. These higher standards will
benefit and enhance the immediate vicinity, and set a higher target for the style and quality of the
bluff and waterfront redevelopment in downtown Clearwater, thus benefiting the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
~an-l~-UU U~:~4P
A
W
e CITY OF CLEAKW Ktl
AFFIDAVIT TO AU'I110RlZE- liENT
PLANNING" DEVILOJ'MENT SE1lVlCFS ADMINISTRATION
MUNIClPAL SBRVlCJIS BtJD.mJG. 100 SOU'lH Mnm.E A VENUJi. r' FLOOR.
PHONE (1Z7)-"Z~67 fAX (727) S6HS16
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINE\..LAS
GcoTRe RahdeT~/Green COTner Inc,Sunset Properties,MoTrishill, Tnc
(H....olhIlJllWOl"Y--1 Osceola Properties Inc.
, . lhat (I am/We are) the owner( s) and record title holder( 5) of the following described property:
ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION:
312.314,400 & 404 Osceola Ave
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for II:
Resi~ential Devetopment
(N_ of "",uoal)
3. Thai tile undersigned (haslhave) appointed end (does/do) appoint_
Richar~ Treta of Osceola Bay Development L~C
.. ~ 11I_.) ..._ony poIIlIoIwt '" - -- _to 8IIoct...... pc1IIM:
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property:
~I~)~
SIG (P''''''' 0wIw)
GeoTge Rah~ert
ndersigned authority. hereby certify that the foregOing is true and correct.
. ! fJ A14t!kr. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY 8F PINELL&S
SWorn e;O!J SU~bed before me this 11-11... day of
0./1// ~1 . A.D.. "':>C...\')to me IftlIl'ar
by J , who is pcrson~lIy
SIGNED (P~ ~
SIGNED (P-,", l./'IIIIffl
IIl;:NEC (p..,....,. 0....,
'0' Michelle SWhite
*YiJ},jf *My CommiSSion CC773141
,~"" Expires October 19. 2002
;~'t,,5~--:'~- ..-:;,/
~ --
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
JAN-19-2000 15:02
??%
P.01
'.
.
~.,
ItJ:':
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
J'LAN'/lIlNG II DJl:VELOlMEN'r SER.VlCES ADMINISTKATlON
MUl'lIOPAL _VlCBS 1l.:1lJ)INO. 100 Sotl1ll. MYIl'IU Ii VT:..Wli, %"" Rona
MONIl (7~7)-,j&2 ~67 'AX ('r.!1) ~576
STAT! Of' FLOItIOA
COUNTY OF "NlUAS
~at~oplo!a Antonio.
(Il-ofIllpOlIII'IIY-1
" lhat (I emJwe are) the ()Wnef(s) end record tille hOlder(s) of lhe foJlowlnQ ciesc:ribed property:
~DME"OROftilnlALLO:AT~~ ~8ceola 400-410 Jones Str8at
2. Thel thls property oonlllitulea th. property for which a reql.l8ll for .
Festdenttal Development
(*-al~
3, That the undera!gned (~slhave) .~inted and (doMIdo\ lIOPOint
~icha~d Trela ot Osceola 8ay Developmeht"ttC.
..-, ....-,.._ ...,..-...w..... _Il1o_....._......
A, That Ihlsllffidavil 1181 been ellscute<lto inclJce lhe City of CI..-wal.,. r10nda to oonlidar end act
on the ltbOve described propeny;
undersigned authority. h81'8by ~ify that the foregoing is true and currect
ITATS OF F~IDA. COUNTY O~\HINEL.LA8
hili n Iu ana IlIl11C:ribold blfOft me lII,a r '1 'r1 day of
2i~~ (' l ~ . ",\J.;}{)~ 10 me and/or
br 0. l' c:::: \) \1\4'" I~ In I t;::;;;; ~p"onaIlW'
;:" ll~pnIducecl
enllfi.-ioll.
ai<lJftD ~ ClwnorJ
~"hi\i)(\ A .~
~....
..,-..-
IlGNEO l"'-'Y <>-ol
.....e (1'--", !lloowl
,..~-;;"~'f""", Barbara G. Barnes
:~f'-tb ,~ MY COMMISSION /I CC746349 EXPIRES
,,:.~.~: June 6. 2002
'-~!I""r.:d!/ aONDEDTHRUTROYfAlNINSURANCE,INC
-',Hr.,,,,"
1~~t~~~~1 n"!
': nUl I I~--j
:U I
i L
;)~J,~miNG & DEVELOP~.~~~~'
SER'v'tCE~
':r\-;.]F ':~ :-::',:~\'.'.~ l
ZO'd
dlE:i;O 00-6[-""["
.F. -.......1 u~,r ARWATER
FlDA VIr Td O. AGENT
l'LANMN<;. ., DEVELO .'.& SM V1\":~~ AI)MINlS~ TI01'oo
MUNlaPA!. SIiRVICllS B11JLDJNG. 100 SOO11i MYRTLE A vn.roE, 2" FLoOR
PHONE ~7l-561 4j67 fAX (721) 56Z-4S76
/
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PlNELLAS
"4alcolm Croft
neverl.y Croft
(~ of! .. pnlpelty _IS)
1. That (I am/We are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
AOORtlj~ OR GFNfRAL I.OCATION.
304-308 Osceola Ave.
2- That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Residential Development
(NllWN tlI requac)
3. That the undersigned (has/havo) appointed and (does/do) appoint
_..---.!.!chard Trela of Osceola Bay Develournen.t
II \"..",.., ~.) to - ."y ~ . ....... _..... --VlD lIffect .uc:n p&t'lleIl.
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, r1ondOl to consider and Q:';:
on the above de$~ribed property:
s.
ereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF P)NEU..AS
SWO lu an<! 5Ub.sClibed before me this :JO trl, aa) ~1
. . A_O. ""~to me ltllu/OI
by M. C.c _ C ,who i:o ptll:;Cln.lll,.
known ".. produeed fJCf .s:sAJo ~
as rdentrtic:cion, ZJ~ l''''1 C-<. '-"- "-R
SICNED (PIllpIIrIy o.w.,
Halcol. c,~
~
~~verly_~oft
SIQ~IED ("1'OOeItY ~
J0'~ie
~io. ScSlie (-kr- --
tIt~.....~, ~.;
SICI,jEO (P'~ Owrw)
ALLEN -:-:~EJ-:"'.'RST
SOLlCITOi..J
MEDWAY HOUSE
18-22 CANTELUFE ROAD
EAST GR:NSTCAD. V":. SUSSEX
RH~:) 38J
Tel: 0134.:1 :::.::: ~! l ::~:3877
(OX. ",""- . . - r-
. ..."''''-- - -- .-. ~ ._:.':" :-EAD)
.~ ==(~ == --\.,-,== o.!
-\.::::.---........- ,
: I I I
, ,1\, - f"\r ~(". II j I
'- 'I I
iL--/
i
.~ ".~..;...:J ~ :-~'. E:"~;:~.'~-'..
s::". -'-'-'
, "-. ."
. ........ .
u
PLA..I\~1NG & lJE"~ELO siRV10~ Al)MINrSTRATJO~
MVNlC'lPAL SERVICES B 100 SOU'rH MYRTLE A vr-.NtTE, 2" FLOOR
PHONE. (727. 4j67 FAX (721) 562-4S76
J
STATE OF FLORIDA
COl>>JTY OF PINIOLLAS
"1alcolm Croft
Beverly Croft
INs"" of! 1II1 propelft "'"'Mfa)
1. That (I amfINe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
AOORt:o~ OR ~FNrRAL lOCA lION.
30~-308 Osceola Ave.
2. That this property constitutes the prop any for which a request for a:
Residential Development
(N~WIl! 01 requeal)
3. That ttle undersi~ned (hOlslhavo) appointed and (does/do) appoint
_._~cha rd frel a of Osceola Ila y Deve lODmenl
111 (hlelltlelr1 oeanl(s) to ..-... any I*lUonlo or ulher dOeu"'..u. ~ lD ll'l~I.uc:h peI!'lan;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to jnduce the City of Clearwater, noridiJ to consider and act
on the above described property;
s.
~TATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF '?)NEU.AS
Swo 1l; and subscribed before me this ..oQ PPt oay '>~
- . A.D. '1:IY~to me ~mJiol
by N. c'c' . C . who j:. pt<150nally
known has produced I'q $:5,/00 ~
as '~e"tIfIC8lion. t)',-u./ l ~ U CJ2-,~
ereby certify that the foregoing is trlle and correct.
SIGNEt) IPtv,lMy Ow!w)
Malcolm cr~
~
~~verly_~oft
SIGoJED WfOPerty OwMr)
J7fLie
~ic. ScSUc- (~r
My~:
SIG'IEO (P,<>pootty Owroet)
ALLEN -:-:8Er:'..:nST
SOLlCITOi..J
MEDWAY HOUSE
18-22 CANTELUFE ROAD
EAST GRiNSTEAD, \'1. SUSSEX
RH133BJ
Tel: 01342 ::':S: I I ::~ 5877
(DX: 300..:.:: C_..~. ~. ..:::'::TEAD)
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENi
SERVICES
L:iTY Ol- C~EtI,r;\\',o\lfR
~~_..~-_.. ."'!!
-::.: ::::::'>~
............
............
iii''li..... .J
........... .
'",!". ~...~~ ~11_~. ~. ~ .
.......... .1
... _.-~ -- -.--- .. 1+
!'+-~......... -- .......-.........,...- ....... -.
...-....... .."....__..~ ,.
..
~ ...~~l--
~ .?
.It. .'i'
fl,' ,~
'~...~.... ......~....""....4.
.. -=- .. .... ... . ."'~.
,_..~ . p, ... . . .
~- :.............. t
..- .. ..............
l.1~ ~I..............
t .~...............
~
~
... --~..~...... ......
~
-
~
'\)J
--n
j,;:t- ;;;.:~
"'-"~
""---1
: ,.-,
;j ;i .
jJ ~ '
L _~_
]
>>
z
~
Z
Q
9'>
o
m
<
m
r
o
"1J
s:
m
z
-4
.~u~.
M
~
M
c::::::::=
~
-n
rn
CO
rv
w
~
CJ
CJ
-=-1- ..,....-.
~i"'~"'" I I, ;
?!i 'I ~
;. , '1 I'
. 'I,,' :~ ,J€k~,t.,'" -,
,~ 7' ~"
>' , " ,)
,t . :~~ql""r" I",
.l i "
-1. ~
~ :;;,~'
)f;>,."'~ 'I
,. ,r" ,,) ~
~i" ,"~'
rr' ~ '.,'
t.,; ,
" -~
""
,
J; :.
I 'f
.,
I
,
'.....
\\
-
<:>
o
1
o
-
,
o
OJ
....{/
.,;
," "
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: May 16. 2000
Case Number: FL 00-01-03
Agenda Item: B 1
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Kenneth H. Roush
LOCATION:
400 Jones Street
REQUESTS:
· Flexible Development approval to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an
increased height from 30 feet to 179 feet, and 2) an
increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50
dwelling units per acre permitted in the Periphery Plan);
and
· Partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-
of-way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan and site survey submitted by N orthside
Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 3.39 acres (including right-of-way proposed to be vacated)
3.24 acres (without right-of-way)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Osceola Avenue currently runs through the southeast corner
of the site. The greater portion of the site lies on the west
side of Osceola Avenue with a smaller portion on the east
side.
East Portion of the Site: 150 feet by 155 feet i:
West Portion of the Site:522 feet by 320 feet i:
Page 1
.
.
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Combination of detached and attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Category
ZONING DISTRICT:
HDR, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
South: Attached dwellings
East: Salvation Army
West: Clearwater Harbor
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vlclmty IS dominated by residential and
commercial uses.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 3.39 acres located between Georgia and Jones Streets, primarily on the west side of
Osceola Avenue. It has about 400 feet of frontage on Clearwater Harbor. The site is currently
occupied by several single-family dwellings. The site slopes from the east to the water with a
grade differential of approximately 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
Development within the CBD, Central Business District, is governed by the CBD land use plan
category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan. A redevelopment plan for downtown was
originally adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993
and 1995, areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship
with the Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible
future inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the Periphery Plan was approved by the City Commission. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
· Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan category
for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
· Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
· Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
Page 2
.
.
. Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this district
was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained zoned
according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old zoning
classification rather than to the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category of
CBD.
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents which must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Harbor. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Harbor."
When combining the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current High Density
Residential zoning district, the site characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff
believes that the site is appropriate for high-rise residential development. In determining the
appropriate density for the site, the staff was guided by the 50 units per acre density in the
Periphery Plan. Clearly, the highest future density in the City should be located downtown where
land and infrastructure are available. Redevelopment is encouraged and residents are a critical
component of an economically healthy full-time downtown. The allowable density in the Central
Business District is 70 units per acre in approximately three-quarters of the downtown with the
remaining center section from Myrtle Avenue to Greenwood Avenue being designated as 50 units
per acre. The transition from the City's highest density in a downtown urban scale to the density
proposed by the Osceola Bay Club on the northwest periphery of the downtown is found to be
appropriate.
The Planning Department recognizes that the land use administration for the periphery areas
should be integrated with the City's current land use and development regulation tools. This
integration is planned to be accomplished within the next year. It is anticipated that the periphery
Page 3
.
.
areas will be rezoned to the Downtown zoning district. When evaluating the dimensional
standards applicable to the Osceola Bay Club proposal, the Planning Staff was guided by a
combination ofthe HDR and Downtown District standards.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes the demolition of the existing structures. The site will be redeveloped with
150 condominium units within two towers. The plan includes a central domed entrance that
connects the towers. The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color
stucco, terracotta color clay roof tile, and smoke blue windows. Two levels of underground
parking will be provided. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated
entrance/exit. Additional exits are provided along Georgia Street from the lower-level parking
garage.
The site plan includes the provision of docks within the harbor that will need to be reviewed under
a separate application. The landscape plan as submitted will need to be further refined and
detailed to meet the requirements of Code. This includes perimeter landscaping within a minimum
width of 10 feet.
The Residential Infill Project option allows flexibility with regard to height. Height is measured
from the mean elevation of the existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or
midpoint of the peak/eave of pitched roof The HDR District permits up to 130 feet for sites
which front on Clearwater Harbor. The Downtown District (to which the site will be rezoned)
permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The request is for 179 feet.
The design as proposed incorporates a 100-foot space between the towers that helps preserve a
view to the water.
In terms of density, the Community Development Code permits 30 dwelling units per acre in the
HDR district. The CBD land use category and Periphery Plan, however, permit up to 50 dwelling
units per acre. This request is for 45 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant is also proposing to vacate a portion of Osceola Avenue right-of-way that extends
between Jones Street and Georgia Street. Osceola Avenue has a right-of-way of 40 feet, 20 feet
of pavement, and is one-way northbound. The proposal includes vacating seven feet of the
northern two-thirds of the road, between Georgia and Jones Streets, and the realignment of the
southern third of the road. Through movement will be maintained. The proposal also includes
the striping of a left-turn lane on Jones Street to Osceola Avenue. Final lane alignments and
widths will need to be determined. Pedestrian access to Clearwater Harbor along Georgia Street
shall be maintained. Georgia Street will need to be improved to meet current engineering
standards.
Currently, Osceola Avenue provides access to the Belvedere Apartments at 300 Osceola Avenue.
The applicant's proposal suggests that access be maintained through an easement. The vacation
of the road, however, should not include the portion in front of 300 Osceola Avenue. It should
remain public right-of-way with removal of asphalt north of the Belvedere curb cut. This
eliminates the need for the easement as suggested.
Page 4
.
.
The Salvation Army site is located east of Osceola Avenue. The Salvation Army representatives
indicated that they are currently preparing plans for the redevelopment of their site. Until these
plans are completed, the future need for access by the Salvation Army from Osceola Avenue is
unclear. The Salvation Army is aware of this application and the proposed right-of-way vacation
request. It has not stated any objections to date.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING
PERMITTED
169 dwelling 40 dwelling units
units units (50 du/ac -
Peri he Plan
150
units
du/ac
PROPOSED IN
COMPLIANCE?
dwelling Yes
(45
* The density is consistent with the Downtown District.
B. FLEXffiILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE
HDR, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA 15,000 sq.ft. 141,094 sq. ft. 147,502 sq. ft. Yes
minimum (3.24 acres) (3.39acres with
right-of-way)
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 522 feet 522 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT 30 feet 28 feet 179 feet No*
maximum
FRONT YARD 0-25 feet 12 feet Osceola Yes
SETBACK Avenue - 1 foot
minimum
SIDE YARD 0- 10 feet 5 feet South (Jones Yes
SETBACK Street) - 5 feet;
minimum North (Georgia
Street - 10
feet)
PARKING 1 space/unit (150 15 spaces 203 spaces Yes
SPACES spaces)
minimum
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 0.158 0.654 Yes
SURFACE
AREA
* The ResIdentIal Infill use allows flexibility from all standards of the Code.
Page 5
.
.
c. FLEXmILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
The development potential of the site is driven by the Periphery Plan of October 7, 1993
which allows greater than current density. The land use of the site is Central Business
District (CBD). The maximum height permitted in the D District is 150 feet. Height is
measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes steeply
towards Clearwater Harbor with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the Downtown
height of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports a
project height of 164 feet. The applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 179 feet.
Overall, the structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown
District. Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy
mix of uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $3,700,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $100,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise permitted in the City of
Clearwater;
The site is currently zoned High Density Residential (HDR) District, and the use is
permitted within that classification. The use will also be consistent with the proposed
zoning ofD (Downtown) District.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project are compatible with
adjacent land uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is specifically
geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also
intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location provides a unique
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
Page 6
.
.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Residential Infill
Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape design
will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are inconsistent
with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the existing structures is
marginal.
6. The design of the proposed Residential Infill Project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements will significantly improve the site. The City will benefit by having an
attractive building complex located in a redeveloping area.
7. Flexibility with regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
Page 7
.
.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned High Density Residential District and is anticipated to be changed to
Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning
classifications. The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential
and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue and egress-only access to Georgia Street on the north. Vehicle trip generation
will not have any significant impact on affected intersections or roadways, with no
reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of two buildings with a 100-foot view corridor.
There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 24, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will
further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the Downtown area.
The current site plan requests 179 feet in total height for the two towers. The Planning
Department, however, supports a maximum height of 164 feet and recommends a revision of the
project to this height. It should also be noted that separate review and permitting of the docks
Page 8
.
.
will be required pursuant to all City and State requirements. Approval of this site plan does not
constitute approval of the docks.
The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval
for Residential Infill Project use, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code. Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application of the
Osceola Bay Club, subject to the following conditions:
1) That Osceola Avenue right-of-way be maintained north of Jones Street, adjacent to
300 Osceola Avenue (Belvedere apartments);
2) That the balance of the Osceola Avenue right-of way be vacated by the City
Commission and relocated by the applicant, as shown on the site plan (with revised
application to be submitted);
3) That the height of the proposed buildings not exceed 164 feet from the mean
elevation;
4) That the landscape plan be further refined and detailed to meet the requirements of
Code, including a minimum 1 a-foot buffer along all street frontages, prior to the
issuance of any permits;
5) That the required open space and recreation land fees be paid to the City;
6) That a sidewalk be provided on Georgia Street for pedestrian access to Clearwater
Harbor;
7) That Georgia Street be improved to meet current engineering standards;
8) That conditions 1-5 be met, to the satisfaction of staff, prior to the issuance of the
Development Order.
The Planning Staff also recommends APPROVAL of the request to vacate a portion of Osceola
Avenue, beginning north of the Belvedere apartments to Georgia Avenue. Final confirmation of
the utility locations may require the retention of an easement over all or part of the Osceola
Avenue right-of-way. The Planning Department will work with the Public Works Department to
resolve this issue prior to review of the vacation reques y the City Commission.
Prepared by: Mark T. Parry and Lisa L. Fierce: if \
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
I'MS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIC D BlFLEJ(1,pending ApplicationslOsceola 400 Osceola CondoslOsceola 400 STAFF
REPORT final. doc
Page 9