The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2003-09048 '\ >- g:;EE :~~~~Dff)n 1 ()~~~~ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: } :~:~&;S:~;;~;;;~~~;';~;,:"g ~~~~~!e~ f\J~fjT WES~~r.p '1 ,# "UU3 ~ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00 EAST~.. (.J L * NOTE: ~TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) - o Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 00 f; '. ~....< "\ FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 11/05/02) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) - APPLICANT NAME: 1 j r C lA (' (. ~ MAILING ADDRESS: ~ 'i ~ &\-\ c..d \ e..\ If\. ~ . G\-- 77 \ \03~ ('\ e.. c.. (' W'..... -\- (1'" ~L 337t;.\ PHONE NUMBER: / J 7 ..-r-"_ 11m FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~ :\ e(\V", ~er CV\r(~ (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME' S,..;\-\-e\: ~\l " \6; ,,\ ~ Co"-\ ~ hCA-cr~ ,1-N c ' ~! ~ MAILING ADDRESS: 5lo\ lo (~\~ ~r\\l-Q.. Ne.tJJ ~('-\- ~\{ h~j J fl, ~<-t (0 ~ ~ PHONE NUMBER: .:1::A\-Bz~5 -13\0 FAX NUMBER: 'T~1- t'L\~1() CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS: ~1. <0 7 _L G\"~F'~\<..._J)~_ C leo..r-w c.. -+er rL I ~ ~ 7 (,.. \ Icl- 1 m I ClfEL ~T /l,4r e:/ rG:.48 '21 - "Z"'d5 -I (p C d. \ .~ d- "B \ (, - 57 S ~5' - 000 - 6 tq 0 ,,73JlC~' :;'2 c/ ~4 rj1 (acres, square feet) ( .. r-. PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): "5; N&5-U' rA /)} IL c.../ (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: ~kl ;. ("; iC,e_ ~Ql () \..Jo.\\ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project- City of Clearwater . . DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A P~~USL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT ~ DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO A- (if yes, attach a copy of the. applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 14 SUBMIT ~ COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY WRITifEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is lo\ted. \-.. A -C- . ~ ' ~.p. ~ J. \.\, ~\ ~ CoY\! ~ I :<'\-l"'~ l..l'A- ~~j <j;l.U"t"iOA.H\" h-j ofroa s. V) {?Y..!f> '\ l...Jj $tllodhAI.50.v ()r'1" 0_<:. ':J:~ hlO..\d ~~ tie l'{')(a...~lll~) ~i c:~ h}n ~ II. J~t':\C~ ~\ \J') ~+~r. ; (l()l\lL;reA,t', ffi~ I t ,~~\- t~~...rY~<: mJ ~oJ..+-1 fV\'tb \. ~~........ ~ ~""i ~(.:... t,,,j wA~ l'c,rJ\-i\iLU!: ~"".JSt" \ oco+ed ON ~l~tN4.\ ~iJ~ ~ .(el'JC.C. ~~e$\-\\ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly imrir the d.lue thereof ~ . ,,\O) "'.e p {,l"lt"V'L~\Ie- erJC P. h '\()t L~ (\ PtJ "\~""Nc...G -\-"'~ j Q.\()tJo. "'r"~~es-t O~~ \,.:,tJe. ~'N '" SO.......~ S,J....:.. VO\let 'j \\wL ~e.s \- \\ 3. Tne prop~sed developme~Cwili n'ot adversely affect t e health or safety or persons residing or working in e n 1Qt\6OrtloOiJ of the proposed :~;'~ ~~::~; ~;:~:;~ ~::~~:~~j' =[~r:':~=~~~{"r Q\\ ?2o~\es \u..c.l<.:) . ..lO~'r-.. -\0 Se(:~ C(' ~SS b~. !ee ~,s \- \\ 4 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. t~J \~ 1...1Ol.J.J 1"l>\~~NCL. \ \. e- ~Je.\ ~y.,loor\'.ooJ I ~ou;.d~ =e&.J..f ~,~~ ~r- O\.o~J ~MlI \ c:k. VII qj () l ~(,}t-.~\\>I\J ~\j C'\-t ei \ ~U~JS ~tl~d.\"";~; ~ ~lIJt~..~. ~ \~ \.)\\\ t...~~ra.dE, \1 ~{'l\J\"'j . 5-'-: tx>~S \-l\ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of o,eeration impa~1 on adjacent pr~perties. \ \>r-C~c.P4. ""l"'..,c.~" -\. \ 0...... cl '(Lif' tJ4 ':\', \\ ae.~toMl*e,\~ '\ N\ ~rD\ Ie., o..re~ J ~rQ~J ~A-~rJ I._I' \\ f'<\o~ 'P \+ ."'.N',o \\~\ i (..pi-- I" lo~~r.:.,t\-t~ 1 -\-h~,t-~\t,l(,p/ -\I \~wJ;';l'llf~~~ I.\'j \ \ "'~\ p ~ 'f'r" ~\ \ fJP, ~ Il\\se... -See ~ J.e-s \ -l \ I:l Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards, Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater _-:-~_...._~"'~ _ __....n . , . . 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development. as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 1~.,. d~I'On~~uL-4~e, ~\J. e~I~~~IG~--\:'~t!!'~~~'\~"^'co(-~,,.,.,.,J a.Nl:L.)\-.\\-e. ~rollh!\..., ~<'~OL(-~~ ~ ~ ~r~ ()\,"ll..\f>)(' \\- w~..\J ~Oll\A-L \)'.:'\uLL~ (~ot\\~\U\L\~~.c .e..:s\4.l\Jj' _C::u.bJ.,\iJi.c;loJ ~:~~~~;;~ 'i::,\~d ~ ll'o>;.~',o\\j It'd" (to "'\-~ ~ c f'\O'>~ 'l<>.\"", 04 ~ 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. '-\~~ 11 ~ O-\- +hl.5 ~j"'.r:\ (1rW'f>.~\l~~ W\~~ \"'~ ~a\l"sio~s cl- +\..... 2~>N\~ d\~{'t-i,,-\ Qt't. ~r~;~A \t.J ~~5 A\.s~...\.'-'"",\,'h.p \L~5 I.J,\,\.\-.\r-J -\-\.L~ ~~"..d:a::l(~-e CMl.po~\~\" (~l~h ~~ nA~Q(P~ ~ t'1\ \\Q.. OMJ UbI s~~l '* \p).~ lJ..~S. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. J \.\Q.\)...... \C)\(,l".(;lIJj \...J 9'Qt..e. 5'(.t ~'S 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of th parcel proposed for developl\le t and the City of Clearwater as a hole. .. t \~: _... ~! ,\, ^ ' .- " ~ ,~ e>L\'I!t-.)~ \0 4 l~ \~~Il.<,-t ~\-'D ,1f"e:..;~JCl1'~~ d~~ ~ ~e> \'- Oil Ci~~ i-~-e.. ~\;Ofd~J \;1o.1~ \~e l.l',~j ~ ,t"~' :>sv_. (:).\ <.p.l,'~C.C(.fl\<I"'g *,-e.. \}es~ rl~~')c,r~:J \\l'J~ ~~l~k~!'~ elL 0.\ ~ toll t( h"Jp ~l'Ol1tJ 5~~~ o.\~'~J '\w +\~ \~~\oN o..,>,\\-e: Cho.',tJ<:10tt ,,\i-\<.\, u..\, \:,,-, e v E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) ~ , STORMWA TER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable Page 3 of 6 - Rexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearw ater e SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 2S' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as a licable" SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the foliowing information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ~ All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals SO feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ~ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; I Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; .. All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and ail required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ~ ~ ~ ~ .fSITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ~,. Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; ....l,.!" Gross floor area devoted to each use; ,~ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; ,.".... Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. ~ ~ ~REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; OR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater . . J, ,\H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) 'j V LANDSCAPE PLAN: fAil existing and proposed structures; I.., .'.. . Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; u.B) Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and ---- common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and ~ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and - percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. 7 ~ o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); .--' ~~ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); D~'\\, COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. tll. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ^' Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. ~~ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ..""'~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if ~, possible) as required. ~ J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) ~ All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or ~ \ to remain. ~~ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing ~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ,~ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) ~ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ~.. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ... ~ L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives t It and photograph t e property described in this applicatio ~ / STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS S orn to and subscribed before me this 2'- day of e A.D. 20~ to me and/or by , I) · 0 is personally known has ~roduced \ 04 - ~ $'1- 0 as ::::. '\ identification. Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfil .>, ,------- . . i AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: ~ (Names of all property owners) \\ 'ly, "') "\.'" \-, ,. . - That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): /1 . ~ \' (u..\ t ;\ 1. 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Sf'J"l(lif;*-j I.~(D-.\\ :,);-Lh ti.D...-L.... <: 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; Th,I (1Iwe), lhe "'d...;.,,,, ,"'ho",y, h...by ""My thel lhe to...o;"9 ;s ~ /' ~ ~ Property Owner 6. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned. an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this , _~!.l.~lIy appeared -t \ M \)T ~ \} - C W'(t(/ J Deposes and says t t he/she fully unllerstands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Fi.- - <(IY - ~'S-4~I~O ~/$,.~lr--- (Ox." 1"2 - 11- c~ '"X ------U-' - Notary Public My Commission Expires: I '\. Ooh Jh~ 30 , ~()---3 day of who having been first duly sworn JOHN v SCHOOTlER No. 00 008188 II Penonally ~ I.D. S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldeve/opment review 12002 Formslsingle family residential infill application 2002.doc Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater "" -.r.NdQ.-'{ S~eet- ~e \ yro~ClSCL\ '-\0\ ~C'-L\.\tj kNee ~-e ~ \idd,e 50\ l\J3 uf \-\e.~\ t\ \ ~ t-j Q,r\t er \CL ?C\.~~ 3 &N{\ti\.u...e.-N ce.- Q ~ '~e S 1-;). Me.. L-\ tQ,\--\oJ S \e\jO-.;\--'\G~'\.l New beNCe- \'t~c:. \U-~-e .:) f~v\~ s \ te\\Jc..e..- +c>r \u-,-\--\-e 1?:>\~~ Su...b d\ u '\~~CI0 ft l\> J'De eo \' o-;\-'~ \..h~ t=e \'J C G a---\: 3:1 l 3 kJ\ N d (f\ A\' \<. 'D \l \l G ~~-e. ~ 1Jsw '"0--\" \J ~ \t.N ce 1>"--0 \-o'S3'r213 LAY\Jd(\\A rk Dr ~ \) e ~9.e 1 "fho\--G \)e~fO-.\\0~ kr0c-e- 3~l3 lAv0Jmwk Or\0~ ANd :Y~.o\.-o ~Ase\"f\e\\J-\- ~,eD.., be.+we.eN 3:)'13 LA\\JQlO\ArK wr\\)t ~ 3:2.8 { J-f+I\Jd N\ATk P,\\Je ~~ g 1hC\-0,5 q' SU\~dlV~~lOf\J wo...\\ UNJ 51 SLL'od~Vl5~O.\) l0GL\ \ I ~Cje.. q t~cA-os w00J.eV\J te\"Jce- o.,+- ~-\--\\. Cur-Ne( o-t ~B-NJ mArk ~ A-\-~oc6 Or~0e.- C\NU Cc L,l WOoJe.N ~NCe Q,-t (\Jor+~ Cc,Ne.\ \0 ~00\-OS G' weod8>4'J -*eNU8 5cu~ Cor N e.(-- It\N dmAf'k -t I()eef ~{-e\d ~_At\Je ~ S l -fe--f~ce l,J',-\-\" 1Ip'llta.\s fror Uod 26~ .sl....l~o\.\0'\S\ 0 r0 \ \ V0Dks ChcGN \~I\)\( -Y6\\Ce OL\oSS l{\rvd rN:IJ..k ---\ A~'10oGd OR, 5Am-e C\\LL~~\j \\ NI( -teNCe 6 ~ow \\'JS 3S( 5eA-- IoAc.K \rd-. ~\-e\J\.oLL.s 0\~~\\c.o<,:\"\.ON --\or- S\\e. r.y\c.uv ft9~\C'0GL\ ,~ ~'(e\J\o\...c~ H?~rooa.\ S\\ee+ \1.\ \-oCCL-\-\oj\J \Y\GL~ \~ ~\j~~~ Su..\V~ .. V~~ ~~.. ~Qq .(2~ :~~je \O-<j.e. ~e . . . Cagni ConstrucUon Company, Inc. . P.O. Box 1045 ClealWater, Florida 33758 Phone (727) 442-4037 Fax (727)442-3953 b;: ',' ": '<"1:':?9~\\\,?, . --, S""'^SlI;;',/,,'/ '.,1,; '/'i!~'i1\i.Vld i '-' ---- I 1 OOOZ s Z ^V~ lU!1 u ~ ill 0 ~ ~,~ (0 \1 -.;j ~ ~..;..:.; Weiland/Sima Residence Proposed Security Fence 3267,3273, & 3281 Landmark Drive The property owner would like to present for the Boards consideration a proposed security fence which requires a deviation from the current City Of Clearwater Development Standards, Division 8 - fences & walls. The Owner currently resides at 3273 Landmark drive. At this address over the past couple of years he has spent in excess of $800,000.00 in improvements to the landscaping and existing structure. The improvements include: 1. Permitting through the Florida DEP & ACOE and the installation of (2) culverts to cross the creek known as Possum Branch Channel,I this joins 3273 Landmark Drive with his property to the North, 3281 Landmark Drive. 2. Permitting & all associated fees to have the overhead lines running between 3273 & 3281 Landmark dropped to underground. This included Time Warner Cable, GTE Phones, GTE Cable, & Florida Power. 3. An extensive landscape package with waterfalls, ponds, lighting, etc., to create an "Estate" setting for the property, while still maintaining continuity of the neighborhood. 4. A security fence along the Landmark Drive property line with lights and electronic controlled access. ~~ \ . . ADDRESSING OF FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA 1. This project would be economically impractical without deviation from the development standards since the existing fence (which was installed through a variance procedure to allow its location) runs l' -0" off the property line and to relocate this, or to align the new fence to meet standards would not be practical. 2. This extension of the decorative fence would enhance the neighborhood and while providing security for the property owner it would provide visual continuity of existing subdivision fencing. This we feel would not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The use of this project complies with the provisions of the zoning district are permitted in this district. 4. The uses within this project are compatible with both adjacent LMDR and LDR District land uses. 5. The fence proposed and additional landscaping planned for this project will upgrade the immediate vicinity by providing a visual continuity of fencing and landscaping not currently present, thus tying in with existing subdivision walls and landscape barriers. 6. The design of the fencing and landscaping creates a form and function which is consistent with the area and enhances the area by creating an "Estate" surrounding, by the photographs submitted it is evident that properties along Landmark (with the exception of a few non-conforming fences) have a similar surrounding. 7. Flexibility and! or deviation from the current standards are justified by the visual benefits of cleaning up of existing landscaping, installation of a pleasing fence, and installation of landscaping that will increase the overall attractiveness of the area and the City. ~e- ) At this time the Owner !Ould like to continue the security tce along the West property line of 3281 Landmark drive as shown on the Site Plan and along the South side of the property line between 3273 Landmark Drive & 3267 Landmark Drive in order to contain his property & maintain security. This would require consideration by the Board of the following: 1. Allowance of a chain link fence along the South property line from the existing brick pillar to an existing wood fence. This would be built in 6' -0" black vinyl coated chainlink and landscaped with a continuous hedge located on the external side of the fence, or with a nondeciduous robust growing vine at frequent intervals along the fence. 2 Allowance of a section of 6' -0" decorative fence to match existing at 3273 Landmark Drive to extend to the top of bank of the drainage ditch to be l' -0" off the property line and be within the 25"-0" setback along the West property line of Landmark Drive. 4. Allowance of a 6' -0" decorative fence to match existing to be 1'-0" off the property line and within the 25"-0" setback along the West property line along Landmark Drive. 5. Allowance of a chain link fence along the West property line as shown on the site plan to help provide safety, & security in the location of the drainage ditch/Utility Drainage Easement. The new fence will be attractive in appearance and be consistent with many surrounding properties in the area creating visual continuity of the subdivision walls already in place. (See Photos) Many properties to the North & South have 6' -0" fences and/or walls within the setback areas and right of way. (See Photos) ~~3 e . .~;. Pf::e c.ter~. ~f'. l.,.,-?; E}IT A.l- Al.U'1. ../ F€Na:.4~. ~ . ~ \:?,b.\Zf\ bL E:Lf.-V P<- T IoN II f. '-'I f EtJc..E. \ '< P E:. \t17""-\/f711 ::: \'-011 ';~r . "., ,;. PLANNING & Dr:'\Ir.~ ,'" w " CITYO- -... 'U ...."..NfSVCS -__,-" I"~ C~ L"fi"): !.:'..:. .. --...o-;--...'~ -\r '.VVh,Ti."'r.) . , , '1..-_l ;:','" ',' ~el\ e --.--. .--//-/. . .-r,.,' Photo #9 : This is a 5'-0" subdivision fence for Turtle Bro'ok Subdivision. Photo #10 : Decorative Fence At 3273 Landmark Drive. '- e ~f' ~J: Photo #11 : Decorative Fence At 3273 Landmark Drive. Photo #12 : Decorative Fence At 3273 Landmark Drive. '\jC' . ~ Photo #13 : Decorative Fence At 3273 Landmark Drive. Photo #14 : Easement Area Between 3273 Landmark Drive & 3281 Landmark Drive. ... J', , . . This is a 4'-0" subdivision wall two properties south on Landmark Drive from the owner's property "Landmark Palms" PHOTO #1 PHOTO #2 This is a 5'-0" subdivision wall that starts 2 propert to the north of the owner's property and continues for several hundred yards. Topography make it appear much higher than our proposed fence ~.,...".,.:" . . ., ~iV~. ~"'N PHOTO #3 This is a wooden fence at the south corner of Landmark drive and Atwood Drive ,/ ,/ ~~- PHOTO #4 'Rh1Ls is a 6'-0" wooden fence at the north corner of Landmark and Atwood Drive -,", \ \' . . PHOTO #7 This is a 6'-0" wooden fence at the south corner of Landmark and Deerfield Lane ---------------------------- PHOTO #8 This is a 5'-0" fence with 7'-0" pillars for the Woodsong Subdivision. ~..") ; . ';.k~ ~~, ~;~r~t,,~tlG~l:~;~; PHOTO #5 u . PHOTO #6 >>;4' _,;"" ,~..~~ ':!:i '~". This is a chain link fence across Landmark Drive Atwood Drive. ",~'~'!;:;';,.C'~ ;-,,~,:,..,~ ",,,,,,...,,..,.,,.~,,,.. <"'.-.-"'f.' ~ '(,:"9,~ This is the same chain link fence shown well within the 3 0 I set back , 'l,,) \ I_ APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION: btt-. ~Ov(,JAS. lru&, lA~t) ~'2/~ LA_~~a(L fj(7111 Gl~AL.uAk : (7~1 ') "1 B 1--<;'~_" <3 FAX NUMBER : 'DOu ~ Yo. ~ ~Br; tA I...d) ~ ~12. ~1l4J J.. (List all owners) APPLICANT NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER PROPERTY OWNERS AGENT NAME MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER A.arLICATION FOR SITE P" PLA....NG &JJEVELOPMENT SERVI MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING. 100 SOUTH PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX ( This form must be submitted for all applications for residential uses, C Signs. vested rights. development agreements. seawalls. docks. marinas an other "' p.O. ~-.,c 104, e.A.~~Ak : ( 7.1---'') l{l(2-- liDs l FAX NUMBER: - L -Sg-? ~ PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: L- A.u D'W4tz.f/!... ~/t'~ V & t(,( f G,",tH.. ~\ 2\ ?- J 2- [;. 111.0 ( ~ 0 i{ (0 Z I 0 DO ( l!)" U) S \....&.l g iAoM.A ( '-I ~ . J)......tH.~ (number of dwelling units. hotel rooms or square f<Y.ltage of nonresidential use) o Q , o \J1 \ '0l \01 SIZE OF SITE: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (Z.eOW~T'i !-Jt:.. ~ I_de L.Ll.,.I~ ~c:...& <-v;{w. v z.<( sd ~M.-lL .~lA(-<SD '\ '_DL\ .o..~ ?~opt(li-<.( t...;.....& DOES THIS APPliCATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES NO V \ STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ot(o ~ day of t!LAL . A.D.. v(~ooo to me and/or by P( A-LJ<. EbwALL~ (2A &r/IJ j . who is personally known has produced Pt.. J>'€. J...; c:. . as identification. C ~ p~!S~..s-4('14"4S~O /:"'11' '-"I.s- 3 ~ ~ ...Tl4lJer 5'. ~ I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. f-5 FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: LAND USE DISTRICr'bF PARCEL: ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS: SOUTH: DESIGNATION: EAST WEST: sm,;:c-; 'NEST FUTL:RE LAND USE CL';SSIF!CAT!ON OF ADJACENT PARCELS NORTH EAST '~re\.l \OL2- \{~ ~l\c..a.+\ ON ~ ~\ t--e ~ tClN t\. p~r-o~Q. \ \bge \~ . ~ NDRTH 1"=1320' Location Map Dr. Douglas Weiland 326~ 3273, 3281 Landmark Drive FL 00-05-22 TRAIL % '" o :? w ",'II""'~ l~ -l SEA L... --... ~~M"''''' ~u ...,1, ~~ ~n"'-: ~~ ~o;, -=- -~ ~... - g" '\.~~jER fC-.9.l -;'OS"........",";'f'll a; '" <.i CITY OF CLEARWATER, PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION VVlfje l~ ENGINEERING lit I ,.-:, Lreu!'OU ( i. .1 1 ( ) -J ...... . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 July 24,2000 -4 Mr. Mark Cagni P.O. Box 1045 Clearwater, Florida 33758 RE: Development Order regarding case FL OO-EJ.Uand 3281 Landmark Drive Dear Mr. Cagni: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.7 of theComrmmity Development Code. On July 18, 2000, the Community Development Board reviewed the above referenced application for Flexible Development approval to construction a brick and m:::ta!' fenct; at a height of six feet along the front of 3273, and 3281 Landmark Drive, as part of a ResiQentiaI Infill Project. Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Board found that the proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, the maximum development potential standards and all other applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community Development Board approved the application. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the date of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners and the Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call the Development Review Division at 562- 4900 ext. 2622. Thank you for your continued investment in the City of Clearwater! ve;r:;;rsbk, GeJ Figurski, Chainnr Community Development Board cc. Dr. Douglas Weiland s: \Planning Department\C D BIFLEX\Jnnactive or Finished ApplicationslLandmark 3267 Weiland _ ApprovedlLandmark 3267 Development order2.doc \bge \3 ONE CITY. ONE FUTURE. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER J.B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER @ BOB ClARK, COMMISSIOKER ED HOOPER, COMMISSIOKER \ . "EOUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVF ArTI()N FMPT nv;:;p" CL WCoverSheet . . AID CK. NO. I -, 0 2- ~hA) DATE ~~sJC6 FLS2003-09048 3267 LANDMARK DR Date Received: 09/25/2003 CURCI, TIM & JENNIFER ZONING DISTRICT: LDR LAND USE: RS ATLAS PAGE: 190A ~,l:1(~~~ n ,&,J sr:p ? ~1 LUUJ i "<-.....; 'iT ,j ..::..{ ~ . . I I CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 January 26,2004 Mr. Tim Curci 2946 Hadleigh Court Clearwater, FL 33761 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-09048 at 3267 Landmark Drive. Dear Mr. Curci: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On October 30, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a brick masonry wall (revised to masonry columns with substantial grillwork) to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25- foot front setback along Landmark Drive, in association with a single family residence, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and condition: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-103.B; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: The proposal shall comply with the landscaping criteria for fencing under the provision of Section 3- 804.A.3. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above one condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plan dated received January 23,2004. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 26, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" ~ , . e January 26,2004 Mr. Curci - Page Two The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist, at 727-562-4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater. * Make Us Your Favorite! ~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard F1ex\Pending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending\IO-30-03 DRC\Landmark Dr 3267 - Curci (LDR)\Landmark Dr 3267 Development Order.doc , , .. ~. . . DRC Meeting Date: Case Number: Applicant: Address: October 30, 2003 FLS2003-09048 Mr. Tim Curci 3267 Landmark Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard approval to construct a brick masonry wall to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25-foot front setback along Landmark Drive, in association with a single family residence located at 3267 Landmark Drive, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B. EXISTING ZONINGILAND USE: Low Density Residential (LDR), Residential Suburban Classification, RS PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Single-family residential Single-family residential ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES: North: West: East: South: Single-family residential Single-family residential Single-family residential Single-family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings, dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: The 0.73-acre (32,056 square foot) site is located on the east side of Landmark Drive, approximately 3000 feet south of Curlew Road. It is located within a residentially developed area. The property is is located in a block of approximately four single-family homes that front on Landmark Drive. In May of 2000, the subject property and the two properties located to the north applied to the Community Development Board to request a wall along the front property line. The request was approved to allow a masonry wall consisting of substantial grillwork spanning masonry columns to a maximum height of six feet under case number FL 00-05-22. This approval has since expired and the property has changed owners. The site is zoned Low Density Residential District and the use, two single-family homes, is considered legal non-conforming in this zoning district. The proposal includes constructing a solid masonry wall with a maximum height of 6 feet. It is being requested at a ten-foot front setback to be consistent with the adjacent properties to the north. The proposal is not in keeping with the height characteristic of solid masonry walls along Landmark Drive. While directly to the north of this property there are two walls that are six feet in height, they consist of substantial grillwork spanning masonry columns. The proposed addition will have little impact on trees or vegetation on the subject property or surrounding properties. The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development will not result in a development in keeping with the existing character of the neighborhood. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Low Density Residential District. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3- 913) and Residential Infill Project criteria (Section 2-103.B) have not been met. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending\1O-30-03 DRC\Umdmark Dr 3267 - Curci (LDR)VAndmark Dr 3267 Staff Report. doc J " . . GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be III harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Development is designed to mInImIZe traffic congestion. Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. [ ] [X] 2. [X] [ ] 3. [X] [ ] 4. [X] [ ] [ ] [X] 5. 6. Design of the proposed development [X] [ ] minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The applicant made application to construct a brick masonry wall to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25-foot front setback along Landmark Drive. The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on October 30, 2003. The Planning Department recommends Denial of the Flexible Standard approval. The applicant then amended his request and the Planning Department recommends Approval of the Flexible Standard approval to construct a wall consisting of masonry columns with substantial grill work to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25-foot front setback along Landmark Drive, in association with a single family residence located at 3267 Landmark Drive, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B. Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 2. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of approval: 1. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist A TT ACHMENTS: S:\Planning Department\C D l!IStandard Flex\Pending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending\1O-30-03 DRC\Landmark Dr 3267 - Curci (LDR)\Landmark Dr 3267 Staff Report. doc . . ~..r',,~ .. ,\~LOF TN.>> ~.~~""~#~bS~ ~~!>"l~"~"" ~,~{<,\ I, !!'" ~~ lli~~ ~ (, .... 'c::c'" '" ':. .",-- ..c.-:. ~.. "~...do~ ~==- L'.;;;: ~ "",r.L\""~ ".~jS ~.?:-$X#m.'~. ~,\\ ............ ,., TE~, ,... ~""rlll CITY OF CLEARWATER LoNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 October 3, 2003 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 3267 Landmark Drive (FLS2003-09048) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 3267 Landmark Drive, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The request is to construct a brick masonry wall to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25-foot front setback along Landmark Drive, in association with a single family residence located at 3267 Landmark Drive, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B. On October 30, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application. The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application.. You may phone me at 727-562-4604 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting (October 30, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.comor my direct e-mail addressisischodtl@clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, ~~ ~+~ ;~~odtler Development Review Specialist S:\Planning Departmenf\C D 8IStandard FleiIPending CaseslJ - Up for the Next DRC\Landmark Dr 3267 - Curci (WRf\Landmark Dr 3267 Notification Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILLJOKSON, CmlMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" e (' SCRIVENS, CLYDE E SCRIVENS, DELORES M 3053 DOXBERRY CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2003 MELTON, CHARLES M MELTON, ELOISE G 3313 W ATERFORD DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2016 BRIGHT, DAVID BRIGHT, PATRICIA 3301 WATERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2016 BRABSON, DAVID A BRABSON, DAWN A 2986 FARNHAM WAY CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 1906 ZELSKI, MICHAEL S ZELSKI, KAREN C 3261 SANDY RIDGE DR CLEARWATERFL33761-1935 GEORGE, ROBERT P GEORGE, MARIE A 2977 EXETER DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 1905 RYGIEL, STANLEY RYGIEL, STEFANIE 2995 EXETER DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 1905 KISSEL, GERALD J KISSEL, RHEA J 2982 BUXTON CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1902 LE MACHER, SCOTT G LE MACHER, SANDRA L 2981 BUXTON CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1902 VOLZ, JOSEPH 2990 EXETER DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 -1904 s~ih~jfnt{P4J'- 0./6' 3321 WATERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2016 LAPIN, ROBERT LAPIN, ELAINE 3309 W ATERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2016 MONGILLO, JOSEPH C MONGILLO, HELEN 2998 F ARNHAM WAY CLEARWATERFL 33761 -1906 TIMM, GEOFFREY J TIMM, MARCIA I 2980 FARNHAM WAY CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1906 PALINKAS, STEPHEN PALINKAS, PATRICIA B 3267 SANDY RIDGE DR CLEARWATERFL 33761-1935 SALVETTI, ANTHONY C WOLFORD, DENISE E 2983 EXETER DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 -1905 LAZARO, LUIS M LAZARO, MARTHA 2994 BUXTON CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 -1902 LUCE, RICHARD C LUCE, JEANETTE M 2976 BUXTON CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 -1902 CHESTER, THOMAS J CHESTER, CAROLYN A 2987 BUXTON CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 -1902 FISHER, H GREGG FISHER, CAROL J 2984 EXETER DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1904 SWEENEY, JAMES D SWEENEY, MAURA A 3317 WATERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2016 KLEIN, GARY M KLEIN, ILENE D 3305 W ATERFORD DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2016 ELKES, GLENN S ELKES, GAYLE A 2992 F ARNHAM WAY CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1906 KUDLER,ALAN KUDLER, JONI 3255 SANDY RIDGE DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 1935 KOST AKIS, GEORGE KOST AKIS, DINA 3273 SANDY RIDGE DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1935 MELLON, FRANCOIS MELLON, FLORENCE 2989 EXETER DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1905 HANNA, DALE HANNA, LOUISE 2988 BUXTON CT CLEARWATERFL33761-1902 V ANDERSALM, JAY VANDERSALM,NANCY 2975 BUXTON CT CLEARWATERFL33761 -1902 BROWNING, NANCY L 2993 BUXTON CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1902 KNELL, CHARLES J JR KNELL, JANET G 2978 EXETER DR CLEARWATERFL33761 -1904 r' e . ' SZUCH, PAUL SZUCH, CONNIE 2998 ASHECROFT CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1901 AMERICAN RETIREMENT CORP 111 WESTWOOD PL STE 200 BRENTWOOD TN 37027 - WEILAND, DOUGLAS J SIRNA, ELIZABETH C 3275 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATERFL33761-1909 KA TOPIS, JOHN KATOPIS, CATHERINE 3007 GEIGER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2005 KOBITTER, BRIAN J KOBITTER, ELIZABETH R 3025 GEIGER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2005 SACHS, HOWARD M SACHS, KAY P 3048 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2000 ROBERTSON, MICHAEL D ROBERTSON, JANET E 3024 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2004 SETTLE, RICHARD A SETTLE, RACHELE M 3006 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2004 MANSOUR, JOHN M MANSOUR, COLLEEN C 3256 NICKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2017 BROWN, LARRY L BROWN, JODY S 3269 NICKS PL CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2017 POCKETTE, WILLIAM W tit 2985 ASHECROFT CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1901 GEIGER, RICHARD 1670 LAGO VISTA BLVD PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3329 WEILAND, DOUGLAS J SIRNA, ELIZABETH C 3273 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATERFL33761-1909 PETERS, MICHAEL PETERS, TAMMY 3013 GEIGER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2005 KELLISH, ROBERT W KELLISH, RUTH E 3031 GEIGER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2005 WILSON, WARREN A III WILSON, BETH S 3042 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2000 MALTA, NAPOLEAO L MALTA, M REGINA 3018 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2004 MAAS, TODD T 3000 GEIGER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2004 RAMEY, ROBERT W RAMEY, VALERIE M 3262 NICKS PL CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2017 ODDO, TOMMY M ODDO, DEBORAH R 3263 NICKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2017 JOHNCOLA, MICHELLE B 2991 ASHECROFT CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - WEILAND, DOUGLAS J SIRNA, ELIZABETH C 3273 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 1909 TOXEY, DAVID T TOXEY, MITZI M 3001 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2005 DALY, RICHARD J DALY, PRISCILLA J 3019 GEIGER CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2005 FIRST INDIANA BANK 1300 WINDHORST WAY GREENWOOD IN 46143- HUMBOLDT, JAMES R HUMBOLDT, CHRISTINE S 3036 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2000 HILL, COLIN J HILL, SHARON M 3012 GEIGER CT CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2004 HICE, RANDY C HICE, ERIN 3250 NICKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2017 CRUM, FRANK W JR CRUM, LYNNE P 3268 NICKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2017 PILATO, SAM A PILATO, TALMA R 3257 NICKS PL CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 2017 ,. e ~ . THOMAS, ALAN E THOMAS, ELAINE M 3251 NICKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2017 e WEILAND, DOUGLAS J SIRNA, ELIZABETH C 3267 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATERFL 33761 -1909 THEOHARIDE, ADRIAN THEOHARIDE, MARY 3261 LANDMARK DR CLEARWATERFL33761-1909 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REviEW September 29,2003 Sutter Building Contractors, Inc. 5616 Gulf Drive New Port Richey, FL 34652 Mr. Tim Curci 2946 Hadleigh Court Clearwater, FL 33761 RE: Application for Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003-09048) to construct a brick masonry wall to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25-foot front setback along Landmark Drive, in association with a single family residence located at 3267 Landmark Drive, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B. Dear Mr. Curci: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to construct a brick masonry wall to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25-foot front setback along Landmark Drive, in association with a single family residence located at 3267 Landmark Drive, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. Please provide the following: 1. A contact person at Sutter Building Contractors,' 2. Email address (if ava.ilable); and 3. Letter of authorization to be signed and notarized for Sutter Building Contractors. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2003-09048. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on October 30, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4604. Sincerely yours, ~~~-l\-- J ~ Schodtler Development Review Specialist S:\Planning DepartmenflC D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Next DRC\Landmark Dr 3267 - Curcl\Landmark Dr 3267 complete letter. doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3375<5 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 January 26,2004 Mr. Tim Curci 2946 Hadleigh Court Clearwater, FL 33761 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-09048 at 3267 Landmark Drive. Dear Mr. Curci: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On October 30, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a brick masonry wall (revised to masonry columns with substantial grillwork) to a maximum height of six feet, within the required 25- foot front setback along Landmark Drive, in association with a single family residence, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and condition: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-103.B; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: The proposal shall comply with the landscaping criteria for fencing under the provision of Section 3- 804.A.3. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above one condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plan dated received January 23,2004. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (January 26, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" January 26,2004 Mr. Curci - Page Two The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist, at 727-562-4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater. * Make Us Your Favorite! ~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\2 - Reviewed and Pending\IO-30-03 DRaLandmark Dr 3267 - Curci (LDR)\Landmark Dr / 3267 Development Order.doc