FLS2003-03012
It "
1 .
.
.
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES~
NORT'
SOUT:
WEST:
EAST:
o
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
>-
~ ~... ....
111- II I&. laC
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPI1re~WATER
Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 11/05/02)
- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: I? f c/-I A f( b /} IV'D /11 A-/Z 1) A/ IS / A /1/} (2 /2rD ~
MAILING ADDRESS: 3524 to L1 S lCf tJ) -# ''12-) P4~/)1 JlM8tJfZ../ ;::-L 3i/bg~
PHONE NUMBER: 7'27- 7J?5- 500 I FAX NUMBER: 72- I - 7 r? s - e; be I
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
1?ICI-I/fR-/) ~/1//) /1~/1/ZZJIJ)I.si/f /1.~fJ/Cri)N
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
E-MAIL ADDRESS: IYI DRloN 1\ @ /-II' lis {30(2{)40rl (o.A.iVtt ~()
CELL NUMBER:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS:
30bl
C A-ILS D 1<1 i/L I L/ ~At2 btl~rV2-
./
OA-)<.S S/fB -Lor 37
( Cli//;Zq/ Ib/ Lf09~7/{)60t/CJ_-;;7D)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
II-O/Y! E 5 Tz-/4-f)
HO/t1 c.5 rfA-tJ
La, .'J 7
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE: 1;( J I,s-D >6{ PI.
/
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 5//V'h it FA'f,ti L V D~rA(/f z'D [JL.u2-L L 1,^/6-- LVI r/-f
(number of dwelling units, hotel roo~s or square footage of nonresidential use)
SClLreff\,lfD - IN POoL
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Rtf)!,(c:.c SID.e{~/l-Sr) 5{~rBAc.K.. ;:::-1'20/1.1 IS- r€z/ TD 10'-9 I(
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) )
RiDt-(c/i 510;:' (tvfsr) SI6rAAC)( r4c.!~ /5;:;7: rt? /Ol_g'l (rod- &;711 J}wt:.L{..tAJ?
I 11)11 /) 00 L- ;; U c,. <.E 560 A<::J<.. /2-0/1-'1 - r, 2> 2- T.
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
~".t~
.
.
,-'DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PR5VIOUSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
'\ DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO L (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
V SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Itf" Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
fL-;,4-SE 5~& ,A-1/A--cll"i_b
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
P L5./-f 5' t
5&~
;4-TT 4 L i-l f' iJ
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
PL-CzA~e:
~E A 1TAC [-K- D
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
P L-~/I,-- 51:3-
<5G E /f7TA-<-fI cz h
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
P L'2~~E.
SE E- If rT..4LH t j)
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
pc iA- SE
>,~e Aff A< 1-1 "i-lf)
o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
pLCAse
SGc A-I{A-{ Hc;b
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
1\
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
pLfA-5 &
sG E /ftTACJl~fj
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
j.J L '?A) t:
SEE
A-1/AcH'i b
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
7JLM5c
SEE
AIl Acl-h? f)
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
P L ~,4-_<;G
SEb A-7TA<ffcZ.D
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
0/ C? A.. (" ..-
/. '- Z "'f ->C
See; A7TA-CHz-j)
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
P L tfA--S ~
9/d- ~
A-rrAc.II~ ;)
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITIAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearw ater
.
.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
if TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
ra" LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study w ill be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o
~\'"
..j.)
if GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
O~tRELI~INARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
~ ,Po ~
o elCOPY OF RECORDED PLAT as applicable.
o
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
-'-
.L.
-
z
-
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
O'j SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
_ Land area in square feet and acres;
-9
-0
I
--
+.
e
~
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
Olftl RiDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering if possible;
..\~.,}"
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
. \~~ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
t'~ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
_ All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
, J
I H.
., ~
.
.
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
_ Irrigation notes.
~ ~ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o ~~ IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
~
o ..\... COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
-J.}
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
ai" BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
it! REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J.
~t
:t
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
o
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o
o
Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K.
..,-to
~~D
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
by
has
as
/J4rJ;~
property owner or representative
[("' H/17Z f) ,41t:fl/Z h~
JOHN V. SCHOOTlER
My Comm Exp. 4I20I05
008188
( I Penanllly ~ 1.0.
(:)t'\ "2..0 a
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
e
.
fAFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
, personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
S:\P1anning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslsingle family residential intill application 2002.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
RECEIVED
Flexible Standard Development Application
MAR 1 8 2003
- Table of Attachments -
Street Address:
Applicant Name:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
3061 Homestead Oaks Drive, Clearwater, FL
Richard and Maronisia Morton
Homestead Oaks Sub. - Lot 37
Lot 37 - 04/29/16/40987/000/0370
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Request:
Reduce the side (East) setback from 15 feet to 10' - 4", reduce the side (West) setback
from 15 feet to 10' - 8", (for both dwelling and pool), reduce the rear setback from 25
feet to 21 feet.
Table of Attachments
Application Responses and Site Data Table:
-Responses to the six General Applicability Criteria Questions
-Responses to the six Residential Infill Project Criteria Questions
Site Data Table
Warranty Deed
Pinellas County Property Appraiser Data Sheet
Location Map (Zoning Atlas Map)
Boundary Survey
Tree Survey
Site Plan
Building Elevation Plan
Grading Plans:
-Original Subdivision Developer Grading Plan
- Lot 37 (Proposed Development) Grading Plan
Landscape Plan
Site Plans for Other Homes in the Homestead Subdivision:
-Lot 11 Site Plan
-Lot 20 Site Plan
-Lot 21 Site Plan
-Lot 26 Site Plan
-Lot 32 Site Plan
-Lot 35 Site Plan
-Lot 36 Site Plan
-Lot 38 Site Plan
..
.
.
Flexible Standard Development Application R E eEl VE 0
Street Address:
Applicant Name:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
Responses to General Applicability Criteria Questions - MAR 1 8 2003
3061 Homestead Oaks Drive, Clearwater, FL
Richard and Maronisia Morton
Homestead Oaks Sub. - Lot 37
Lot 37 - 04/29/16/40987/000/0370
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Request:
Reduce the side (East) setback from 15 feet to 10' - 4", reduce the side (West) setback from 15 feet to 10' - 8", (for
both dwelling and pool), reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 21 feet.
Responses to Questions (General Applicability Criteria):
1. The proposed development is a single family, single story home with a swimming pool and screen enclosure.
The home is consistent with the size and architecture of other homes found throughout the Homestead
development and the pool will be similar in size and construction found throughout the development as well.
2. The proposed development is bordered on all sides by previously developed properties and does not discourage
additional development of any of the lots. The proposed development will increase the value of land and
buildings in the Homestead community. The attendees of the February meeting of The Homestead Property
Owners Association agreed that the proposed development will increase property values of the community as
well. Additionally, the proposed development will not encroach on any easements.
3. The proposed development is a single family home with a screened-in pool. The home, landscaping, and pool
will be typical to other homes throughout the Homestead community and will not contain any hazards that
would adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The pool will
be completely screened in and will have lockable access doors.
4. The proposed development will have a typical 3-car wide driveway with access to Homestead Oaks Drive - the
same as all the other homes on the street. The proposed development will not contribute to any traffic
congestion.
5. The Proposed development is a single family, single story home with a swimming pool and screen enclosure.
The home is consistent with the size and contemporary architecture of homes found throughout "The
Homestead" development. The swimming pool will be typical to all of the other homes in the community and
the associated pool screen enclosure will be of similar construction found throughout the development as well.
Many other homes in the community have been granted setbacks similar to those requested in this application.
For example:
(Reference the attached site plans)
,
Lot 11 has a 10 foot side (West) setback and a 20.2 foot rear setback.
Lot 20 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback and a 22 foot rear setback.
Lot 21 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback and a 20 foot rear setback.
Lot 26 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 32 has a 24 foot rear setback. .
Lot 35 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 36 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 38 has a 10 foot side (West) setback.
6. The Proposed development is a contemporary, single family, single story home with a swimming pool and
screen enclosure. The proposed development will be in compliance with all Homestead Homeowners
Association architectural rules and regulations and will in no way adversely affect any adjacent properties either
visually, acoustically, or olfactory.
~
. .
Flexible Standard Development Application
Responses to Residential Infill Project Criteria Questions -
Street Address:
Applicant Name:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
3061 Homestead Oaks Drive, Clearwater, FL
Richard and Maronisia Morton
Homestead Oaks Sub. - Lot 37
Lot 37 - 04/29/16/40987/000/0370
Request:
Reduce the side (East) setback from 15 feet to 10' - 4", reduce the side (West) setback from 15 feet to 10' - 8", (for
both dwelling and pool), reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 21 feet.
Responses to Questions (Residential Infill Project Criteria):
1. The Proposed development property is an existing lot. It is the fmal undeveloped lot in "The Homestead"
community. The structures that will be located in the setback are a single family, single story, detached
dwelling with a swimming pool and screen enclosure which will be impractical without the requested deviations
from the intensity and development standards. The requested deviations are within the requirements/restrictions
recorded in The Homestead Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. Many other homes
throughout the community have been granted deviations similar to this request including the flowing lots:
(Reference the attached site plans)
Lot 11 has a 10 foot side (West) setback and a 20.2 foot rear setback.
Lot 20 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback and a 22 foot rear setback.
Lot 21 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback and a 20 foot rear setback.
Lot 26 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 32 has a 24 foot rear setback.
Lot 35 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 36 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 38 has a 10 foot side (West) setback.
2. The proposed development will increase the value of land and buildings in the Homestead community. The
attendees of the February meeting of The Homestead Property Owners Association agreed that the proposed
development will increase property values as well. The lot is presently undeveloped. Based on other new
homes selling in the area the value of the proposed development is estimated to be $420,000 when completed.
3. The proposed development is a contemporary, single family, single story detached dwelling with a swimming
pool and screen enclosure which are permitted per section 2-103 of the zoning regulations.
4. The proposed development is a contemporary, single family, single story detached dwelling with a swimming
pool and screen enclosure similar and compatible to the other homes throughout 'The Homestead' community.
5. The property for the proposed development is an existing, undeveloped lot within 'The Homestead' community.
The lot is the final undeveloped lot in the community. The lot will be developed in accordance with all City,
County and Homestead Homeowners Association rules and regulations.
6. The proposed development is a contemporary, single family, single story detached dwelling with a swimming
pool and screen enclosure similar and compatible to the other homes throughout 'The Homestead' community.
As a new home in the community, the proposed development will enhance property values and the community
character as well as that of the City of Clearwater.
-Continued on next page-
,
.
.
Responses to Questions (Residential Infill Project Criteria):
(Continued)
7. The proposed development is a contemporary, single family, single story detached dwelling with a swimming
pool and screen enclosure that is consistent with all other homes in 'The Homestead' community. The
requested setback deviations are also typical to many other homes throughout the community including the
following Lots:
(Reference the attached site plans)
Lot 11 has a 10 foot side (West) setback and a 20.2 foot rear setback.
Lot 20 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback and a 22 foot rear setback.
Lot 21 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback and a 20 foot rear setback.
Lot 26 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 32 has a 24 foot rear setback.
Lot 35 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 36 has a 10 foot side (East & West) setback.
Lot 38 has a 10 foot side (West) setback.
The requested deviations are also within the requirements/restrictions recorded in The Homestead Declaration
of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. The home will have a beneficial impact on property values through
the community and City of Clearwater.
.
.
Flexible Standard Development Application
- Site Data Table -
Street Address:
Applicant Name:
Legal Description:
Parcel Number:
3061 Homestead Oaks Drive, Clearwater, FL
Richard and Maronisia Morton
Homestead Oaks Sub. - Lot 37
Lot 37 - 04/29/16/40987/000/0370
Request:
Reduce the side (East) setback from 15 feet to 10' - 4", reduce the side (West) setback from 15 feet to 10' - 8", (for
both dwelling and pool), reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 21 feet.
Site Data:
Land Area: 12,150 sq. ft. (0.28 Acre)
Number of Existing Dwelling Units: 0
Number of Proposed Dwelling Units: 1
Gross Floor Area to be Devoted to Each Use:
Living Area: 3,064.00 sq. ft.
Garage: 687.00 sq. ft.
Lanai: 335.00 sq. ft.
Entry: 113.00 sq. ft.
Pool Area: 1,050.50 sq. ft.
Walkways: 347.20 sq. ft.
AlC Pad Area: 60.00 sq. ft
Driveway: 950.00 sq. ft. (from garage to property line)
Total: 6,606.20 sq. ft.
Parking Spaces: 3 car garage
Landscape Material: Reference Enclosed Landscape Plan
Building and Structure Heights: Reference Enclosed Elevation Plan
Impermeable Surface Ratio: 6,606.2/12,150 = .5437 (54.37%)
Note:
Standard Black Barrel will be used for storage of garbage and will be stored on the concrete pad on the East side of
the home.
e
eKAktffil F. DE BLAKER, ClERI( OF COURT
PINELLAS COUNTI, FLORIDA
Return to:
David M. Pearson
Act Fast Title Services, Inc.
900 Drew Street
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Incidental to the issuance of a Title Insurance Policy
Parcel LD. Number: 04/29/16/40987/000/0370
Grantor(s) Social Security Number:
File Number: 2002-135
I
8C18%13 03-12-2002 0'3:35:32 TNB
51 DED-JORDAHMRTON
000000
IU:02093983 BK:1l883 SPG:1124 EPG:1125
~~RDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50
DOC- STAW - ~9 3 $616.00
WARRANTY DEED
TOTll:
dQ. TENDERED:
CHAtff .
BY _ IIPUTY aDK
02-093983 MAR-12-2002 9:3S~
PINELLAS CO 8K 11883 PG 1124
I 111111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 11111 1111 IUL_ .
$626.50
$626.50
$.00
r
-~&~
THIS INDENTURE, MADE, dated March 1,2002, by Karl L. Jordan, An Unmarried
Man, whose post office address is 6464 126th Avenue North, Unit 1, Largo, Florida 33773,
hereinafter called the Grantor(s), to Richard Morton and Maronisia Morton, Husband and Wife
, whose post office address is 35246 U.S. 19 North, #192, Palm Harbor, Florida 34684, hereinafter
called the Grantee(s):
(Wherever used herein the terms Grantor(s) and Grantee(s) include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives,
and assigns or individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporation.)
~!IJ::[E.~~E.IH:
That the said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum ofTen Dollars ($10.00), and other good
and valuable considerations to it in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby
.. --- grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the Grantee(s) all that
--:- -- --.(0 certain parcel of land situate and being in the County of Pine lIas and State of Florida, viz.,
\1i--J.-&.
. VLot 37, Homestead Oaks, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 99,
Page 7, Public Records of Pine lIas County, Florida.
Subject to easements, restrictions, covenants, and reservations of record.
Subject to taxes for the year 2002 and subsequent years thereafter.
Together, with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, with every privilege, right, title,
interest and estate, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining;
To have and to hold the same in fee simple forever.
And said Grantor(s) hereby covenant with said Grantee(s) that the Grantor(s) are lawfully seized of
the said in fee simple; Grantor(s) have good right and lswful authority to sell and convey said land,
and hereby warrant the title to said land and will warrant the same against the lawful claims of all
persons whomever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes acquired subsequent
to December 31,2001.
Grantor(s) herewith affirmatively represents and attests that the real estate being transferred and
alienated hereby is not the homestead of said Grantor(s) or, in the alternative, if said real estate is the
e
~ PINELLAS COUNTY FLA
OFF.REC.8K 11883 PG 1i25
homestead of any person or person(s) identified as Grantor(s), then it is herewith affirmatively
represented and attested that any spouse, either at law or in fact, of any person identified as
Grantor(s) has/have executed this instrument of conveyance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor(s) haslhave caused these presents to be executed in
its name the day and year first above written.
Signed, Sealed and Delivere
in the presence of:
X
Karl L. Jorda
x
State of Florida
County of Pinellas
I am a Notary Public of the state of Florida. THE FOREGOING INSTR
acknowledged before me on March 1,2002 by Karl L. Jordan, who is perso II known
to me, or who has produced a State Drivers License identification, and wh di not take
an oath.
M
Notary Public
Printed:
-.,....--
Warranty Deed
2
-Pinellas County Property Appra.nformation: 0429 164098700003.
Page 2 of5
04 / 29 / 16 / 40987 / 000 / 0370
ZO-feb-Z003 JilTJ SlTJith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:59:04
Uacant Property Use and Sales
COlTJparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1. 2002, based on Census Trac t : Z68.13
sales frolTJ 2000 - 2001:
96.100 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IlTJp
Plat InforlTJation 3 /Z.OOZ 11. 883/1. 1Z4 88.000 (Q) U
1981: Book 099 Pgs 001-009 4 11.996 9.305/Z.153 49.500 (Q) U
0000: Book Pgs - 5 11.995 8.989/Z.Z80 163.500 (U) u
0000: Book Pgs - 1 /1.988 6.196/ 111 Z.050.000 (M) U
2002 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market: 81.100 HOlTJestead: 0 Ownership t .000
Historic : 0 Use 1: .000
Assessed/Cap: 81.100 Tax ExelTJp t t: .000
Other ExelTJpt: 0
Taxable: 81.100 Agricultural: 0
2002 Tax InforlTJation Land InforlTJation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
02 Millage: Z3. Z911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 1.90Z.88
1) 90 x 135 1.050.00 90.00 f
Special Tax . 00 2) 0 x 0 .00 . 00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HolTJes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
1. 90Z. 88 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exelTJptions, Total Land Value: 95.445
2002 taxes will be :
1.90Z.88
Short Legal HOMESTEAD OAKS SUB LOT 31
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 2/2012003
.
0:
IiLI ...
~ ~
IS: ~
~~5
~~8
~;~
t: ii:
u
...l~.iI~ ~ ::
ii~~f~~~ l
2 g:~t;~~:
G:,gooiJ;==~~
o~;'g.25o'Oi
5E~!~8i~i
:! l~~ ~-D~~ =
:o.~o5ii= ~
.Di:)llll5~!
!1;~"':~~€]
~~~;111~i
;~~~:r~:if
~itii:~ ~~i
g1:!i~~!~~~
t;~.:~.s~t~ t~
~~~Ei'8~io
ii'2 ~~':'l oa
~ ~ ;1-;: ~G~~
~~i~if~i'i~
~ ~~.
~ ~~.i
,. ~o~~l
: ~~;. S'Y
.....<.....d.... ~
~~~i~l
lf~~~:r.~
~ ~!
:J Cfi!!.':':
~ ~.f~
a
~
..~
t~
t ~
.. ~
11 2
1:~
o ~'I!o
-..~
:<l"'UH
~.~...
. it~
.!lEi
g.'C
ii
::ti
.. E
f,~
j;
.!'
o
o
<0
"0
~
o
~
2m
o
o
'"
5
lD
,.
::>
z
><
(.J
o
--'
lD
'-
(1\
(1\
w
0:
o
o
<(
I-
g
~
..
u
Vl
o
z
w
D
w
-l
@~
o
o
o
r-I;R.\-..,.~,
w
Z
:J
(1\
I-
:;;
:J
>
I-
U
l"
:;;
:J
1:: >-
0:1-
w[;
ll.
00:
a:w
ll.1-
<
,;0
0:
<(<(
ww
0:--'
<(.J
OW
wO
0(1\
<l-
I::>
(1\0
~,
l. I
1'1
LJ
.
..01
001
W'-
1/)00
5~
w'-
~S'
<{
(f)c.D
<(LO
-,N
I-
<(
zw
o
'-' ~~
Z b! I
Z ILl/)
O 0."
-tN
N:::-I
3:
z-t
x
w
z
z
<
o
l-
I-
Z
W
,.
W
w
0:
<.:>
<
>-
l-
ll:
w
ll.
o
0:
ll.
o
~
o
W
Z
o
N
is
;:::
..
z
"
Vi
W
o
"
z
Z
o
N
w
Z
:J
5 s~H
x ~~~~
I ~ ~:r: r;
~~~~
>
I-
o
...
.
ee6l!J
tod'e6JaW-S-U!Bua 'SWepea 'Wd 6t:a:to U)It~n;o 'l5Mp'V9SZ\SVll\1\a"':)O.1n\l\NI~N3\:S
lfJ7~.4r"jJ1:
t "Q. ~ ~LOF T/(~
~h ~, ,~~p,~~ ~)l..~,'
L~;c..' ~~, ~, 7..
~i::::;S" I ~1\""""
'''~'Yi ~' ) ~~,
'~C"':t""""'-, = - ',." -=:t, "','
",r::~ ===~:
..~~ - ,~~
\~~~i10~~~~
......-...,~TE~,;..'Jl~tt
~~"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
April 18, 2003
Mr. & Mrs. Richard Morton
35246 US Highway 19 North, #192
Palm Harbor, FL 34684
RE: Development Order regarding Case FLS2003-03012 at 3061 Homestead Oaks Drive.
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Richard Morton:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On April 17, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your
application for Flexible Standard Development to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 10 feet and
reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, as a residential infill under the provisions of Section 2-
103. The proposal includes construction of a new single-family residence and an enclosed swimming
pool. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and condition:
Bases for avproval:
1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2-
203.C.;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Condition of Approval:
1. That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a revised grading plan which preserves existing trees and indicates corrected finished floor
elevations and cross sections be submitted to an approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any
permits;
3. That no part of the proposed addition be constructed within the 15 foot drainage and utility
easement;
4. That the applicant be responsible for all easement inspections during the installation of the
proposed enclosure;
5. That revised site and landscape plans are submitted to and approved Staff which indicate Code-
compliant sight visibility triangles prior to the issuance of any permits; and
6. That solid waste service be arranged with the City prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
April 18, 2003
Morton - Page Two
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development with above condition. The approval is based on
and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received March 18,2003.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (April 18, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be
obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change
with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, at 727.562.4604. You can
access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. * Make Us
Your Favorite!
v ~ ~ru~ yours,
v;r/ttU.~~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard FleXIPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Homestead Oaks 3061 Morton\Homestead Oaks 3061
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
CL WCoverSheet
. .
RECEIVED
MAR 1 8 2003
PLANI'~lI\ju ':x LiL;: LLv~IVlENT
::iE:,\iiCES
CITY 01- CLLt\,dvATER
FILE
FLS2003-03012
3061 HOMESTEAD OAKS DR
Date Received: 3/18/2003
MORTON.. RICHARD
ZONING DISTRICT: LDR
LAND USE: RS
ATLAS PAGE: 256A
~'~"""'~. A:> I'D"'':;'
."'''7''''< '.iI., " ','
.,;.<'~l;::. "'f ". ,:
''''" ,',..
CttNO. 31~q
DAle 031 ~~3 ~W
J
.
.
DRC Meeting Date: April I? 2003
Case Number: FLS2003-03012
Agenda Item: 11 :30 a.m.
FILE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:
Mr. Richard Morton
LOCATION:
3061 Homestead Oaks Drive
REQUEST:
Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the side setbacks
from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 21 feet,
as a residential infill project in the Low Density Residential district under
the provisions of Section 2-103. The proposal includes construction of a
new single-family residence and an enclosed swimming pool.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Mr. Richard Morton.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.28 acres; 12,150 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 90 feet of width by 135 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Vacant
Single-Family residential
PLAN CATEGORY:
RS, Residential Suburban Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
LDR, Low Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family residential
West: Single-family residential
East: Single-family residential
South: Single-family residential
DRAFf Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13,2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 -
Page 1
e
e
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings, dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The 0.28-acre site is located at the south side of Homestead Oaks Drive approximately 60 feet
west of McMullen Booth Road. It is located within a residentially developed area. The site is the
last vacant lot in the Homestead Oaks subdivision.
The proposal includes construction of a new 3,751 square foot single-family residence and an
enclosed swimming pool. The setback reductions are to the proposed single-family residence,
driveway and the enclosed swimming pool on the side (east) setback (10.33 feet) and the side
(west) setback (10.66 feet) and the reduction to the rear (south) setback (21 feet) to swimming pool
deck and enclosure. The proposal will otherwise meet all other Code requirements. All applicable
Code criteria have been met.
A. COMPLIANCE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-201.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 2.5 dwelling units Vacant One dwelling Yes
per acre (one unit) unit
IMPERVIOUS 0.60 0.00 0.54 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13,2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 -
Page 2
e
.
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PROJECTS IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-103.B):
STANDARD PERMITTEDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 12,150 square 12,150 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 90 feet 90 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT 10 - 25 feet Vacant 25 feet Yes
SETBACK
REAR o - 25 feet Vacant South: 21 feet to No
SETBACK pool/enclosure
SIDE o - 15 feet Vacant East: 10.3 feet to No
SETBACK house/pool
West: 10.6 feet
to house/pool
HEIGHT 30 feet Vacant 18 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING One space per Vacant Six spaces Yes
SPACES unit (one space)
minimum
DRAFf Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13,2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 -
Page 3
.
.
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-103.B):
1. Single-family, detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential
infill project applications;
The proposed use is a single family, detached residence.
2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development
standards;
The Proposed development property is an existing lot. It is the final undeveloped lot in the
Homestead Oaks subdivision. The structures that will be located in the setback are a single
story, single-family residence with an accessory swimming pool and enclosure, which will
be impractical without the requested deviations from minimum standards. Several homes
in this subdivision have been developed similar to this request (see attached surveys of
surrounding properties).
3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposal is similar in size, scale and placement to other structures on surrounding
properties in the neighborhood. It will provide an essentially new home and will constitute
an improvement to the site and the neighborhood as a whole.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
The site is zoned Low Density Residential District and the proposed single-family
residence and pool/enclosure will be in compliance with the zoning.
5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly single-family residential dwellings. The subject site
is proposed with a new single-family residence and is compatible with adjacent land uses.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The proposal will result in a home similar in character to other homes in the neighborhood
and will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development with an
attractive building, driveway and pool/enclosure.
7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposal includes a 3,750 square foot single-family residence with an accessory
pooUenclosure. The proposal will result in a home similar in size and location to other
homes in the neighborhood.
DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13,2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 -
Page 4
e
.
It is consistent with the Low Density Residential District
and other developments in the area.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole by developing the last vacant lot in the subdivision. The reductions in setback
area si mi lar to other properties in the area.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with single-family dwellings and pools similarly sized and
placed. It will provide a positive redevelopment example for the area. The development
complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Low Density
Residential District. The site is similar in size and dimension to other properties in the area.
The proposal is consistent and in harmony with scale, bulk, coverage, density and character
of the adjacent properties.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The proposal is similar in size, scale and placement to other structures on sun.ounding
properties in the neighborhood. It will provide an essentially new home and will constitute
an improvement to the site and the neighborhood as a whole.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood and is permitted in the Low Density Residential District.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion in the area.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity.
DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee ~ March U. 2003- Case FLS2003-0200R _
Page 5
.
.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes construction of a new 3,751 square foot single-family residence and
an enclosed swimming pool. The setback reductions are to the proposed single-family
residence, driveway and the enclosed swimming pool on the side (east) setback (10.33 feet)
and the side (west) setback (10.66 feet) and the reduction to the rear (south) setback (21
feet) to swimming pool deck and enclosure. The proposal will otherwise meet all other
Code requirements. The level of service on Homestead Oaks Drive will not be degraded.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on March 13, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROV AL of the Flexible Standard
Development application is to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear
setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, as a residential infill project in the Low Density Residential district under
the provisions of Section 2-103. The proposal includes construction of a new single-family residence and
an enclosed swimming pool for the site at 3061 Homestead Oaks Drive, with the following bases and
conditions.
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project
per Section 2-203.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of approval:
1. That a $200 Recreation Facility impact fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
2. That a revised grading plan which preserves existing trees and indicates corrected finished floor elevations and
cross sections be submitted to an approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. That no part of the proposed addition be constructed within the 15 foot drainage and utility easement;
4. That the applicant be responsible for all easement inspections during the installation of the proposed enclosure;
5. That revised site and landscape plans are submitted to and approved Staff which indicate Code-compliant sight
visibility triangles prior to the issuance of any permits; and
6. That solid waste service be arranged with the City prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist
DRAFf Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13,2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 -
Page 6
.
.
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard FleX\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Homestead Oaks 3061 MortonlJlomestead Oaks 3061
STAFF REPORT. doc
DRAFT Staff Report - Development Review Committee - March 13, 2003 - Case FLS2003-02008 -
Page 7
.
.
,,"""'-
. .'~\~LOF Till ,.......
..,.:.....\ ~.,.J.Tr.,.,.~..,lo,~~.....
....f:::i... .,.........~":..
:~(,)V.~\ !;\~
III ~_ f\~rW1, ~
~~~ ~~=C,,:~~:
... C1'" ~"'~, ;:;::...
-~..~~===-- .t ~-.~
~-~JA#;;~~;II"~~\\\
---...)1TE~""..
'1.11"
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
February 20, 2003
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
AT 3061 HOMESTEAD OAKS DR (FLS2003-03012)
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 3061 Homestead Oaks Drive, the City of Clearwater Planning
Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property.
The request is to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 21
feet, as a residential infill project in the Low Density Residential district under the provisions of Section 2-103.
The proposal includes construction of a new single-family residence and an enclosed swimming pool.
On April 17, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review
and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance the City's Community Development Code.
Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving,
approving with conditions or denying the application and a copy of this Development Order will be mailed to
you. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be April 24, 2003.
The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application. You may phone me at 727-
562- 4604 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be
considered in the City's review of the application.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within
the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review
Committee meeting (April 17, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning
Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through the City's
website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
Sincere~
J~hOdtler ~
Development Review Specialist
FILE
S:\Planning DepartmenflC D B\Standard FleX\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Homestead Oaks 3061 Morton\Homestead Oaks 3061
N otijicationLe tte r. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIOKER * BlI.L)ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 20, 2003
Richard and Maronisia Morton
35246 US Highway 19 North, #192
Palm Harbor, FL 34684
RE: Application for Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003-03012) as a residential infill
project to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 10 feet and reduce the rear setback
from 25 feet to 21 feet for construction of a new single family residence and swimming
pool in the Low Density Residential district under the provisions of Section 2-103.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Morton:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to reduce the side setbacks from 15 feet to 10
feet and reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 21 feet for construction of a new single-family
residence and swimming pool in the Low Density Residential district under the provisions of
Section 2-103 located at 3061 Homestead Oaks Drive. After a preliminary review of the
submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete.
The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case
number: FLS2003-03012.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on April
17, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle A venue in downtown
Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727-562-4582 no earlier
than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed.
You or your representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of
the meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4604.
Sincerely yours, F I L E
0r&W, ~~
Jo~ Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D /J\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\] - Up for the Next DROJIomestead Oaks 3061 MortonVasmine 1438
complete.doc
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"