Loading...
FLS2003-04041 l PI,"O'09 D!,"' 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 . u~ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: / ZONING DISTRICT: I E-OC:> A:/~brJ.. LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: _ _ SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: s"..~~ ~I-\. SOUTH: WEST: EAST: o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLlCATlnC~C E 'VE 0 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site ~~~ . , ., o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00 APt< 1 'i 2003 * NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLlCt..TJ.O~l.LISr&iif~ETS) PLANN\NU Ut:.t'I'\~ I FLEXIBLE STANDA~V~~T APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 11/05/02) ..' -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) ( <;;T~ve) APPLICANT NAME: /~ 'v N [l /-4 frl ~ S'. /J IV d ,,7: (, - (3- f G, II e J;o ,'E MAILING ADDRESS: I / Cj /.-.,j; ."dL...JAILJ L <; //1;J). r l-eallt-.JAI-t..:<:/C.., FL , I PHONE NUMBER: 7- 2 7- <;- b b - Cj S 7 <; FAX NUMBER: (S;rcr<:;=) PROPERTY OWNER(S): I<CIVN e f~ h. s: it N 4' J l.-, l/iT f G ./1 Es"jJ I C" I (Must include All owners) AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: C 1,-7:A/l.. t..v A fC/L. .F L I' S~MBER: ~UMBER: Y- 6 6 - <7 '3 c; ~ FAX NUMBER: r- -x,.q1)~ (') E-MAil ADDRESS: O.^-1. S' N G ~ f'..1 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS: II q L);Vt/i-..IAR J T~ ( A.-J )/ C I e-A,A:.. 1-) fir fc...z/L. P ( { lEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: () Cf / Z Cilt S/lf33 <6 1. 1(;; OD /3 J"o I , I I Z 0/ X ~b I '-f I / PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S):. f2 E~"" c::/c~ tV ~"~ I 0 tV e &. AI, . f - RA fI-, 6 ( e /l- / (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): , I (include all requested code deviations; e.g. r duction in 7. ~ ~~Qu , RE:-h ~ "5>1 '" F<-C-"'f St III trLE PA I-t , c- t.t J;?E= S 1 t::E:AJC€-. <....~ quired number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) po,<' A-bb),.., ~,.j /""0 Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater . . DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREytOUSL Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. --;-: . j) j ,./-' (' / r 1'". ) . 1/ / ,r '-1;;r /.J /7--1 LJ ''''1 S L'Z. / A 0 L.;c ., 01 Co .u 2 x: c.r.,f LA; . ({ (0 e :;,;;f1~'i:,~~t ~~f4 SI-~:~,~rL,~::t~~ (~dft L,'~~ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ,_. // ./ r L f'L/ / ?,;- fA c:t 6L 'T1 C.'Ii ,/;("/t iF ..r IIv" /;:> ,>cC/Z a d' T" c? C (../l,e./2 c: A;I f I,' ,v C!- or f (, c: lit.) (--r S' CZ (:) N ^ e IU 0/2. f C, .s ,- cI' C:' A.# c;f c...../;i if fA. c t: /.I (-../ A tr f-~ f d,{ (/ lcfl P J" r) t...,,~ ~ D,,^,,,- <?FA-o...-t ,Ii, (! Ac".Ji'.q (.~ N f ;~ '-Z-e't, a I 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed uj};'f ~ l! iA I /,/ (! 7' ,S-~ A If Ad!d!/1.1.,,) "~' 1/ ~ ~s; elf? (A/f" f~;,.j A ~.IAtf:j.,JAy !)(:?f(...,/(li!-A.,J Ot.rA t.o/""/l'; A,,/r/ r( e A a:{?,AC L'1A.J I j(U.,'O/Jf.::'~f.", A/cfl 1M lJo5~,r' (VV' It (3", /fr., c>;e. sA-raf; d,-a-'r)(."Z"Z., '{ I I/'I 4.Jhe proposed develQPment is d~signed-,to minimIZe traffic conga4ion. ..... ' -" t' . 'j .' t,,'r Adt!fI"r"~N ,.r ,IV' A"" /'l~C-t:\ i",vir"r:(.., {'J (Vi.>'<~A_~", DN{}, 4ir.?C4- , ~'tf a G.. /'7 fA. J-\J { w 74 .--.s- " j' -1 S;\-'..A y; II '.A / A If, _J ~ "" , t=: f ~ ~ '70 c:.:...... ,:... (V'J /J,e...,.,IJ (:r:'Lf t" / ,/,' / / J /' f1...;dlA ~~jl! ./-Cz,'Af ~t'?-;;/1/ZAflZJ' 6~ f1A"'/i'Jr'ZA..f), {;Ll__ ~4(T /t~ACl?"4 5. /?'~4osed dev,&pment is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development , 7 t,.. >' ,/J />~... .<1,~J f?-c/ Aci/c"//!~,,; I '..> I" (I 6 ~ A bs 0 I ~ f-Cf it.> L....., tJ L/J' f (,'7-..J I I" I'. /' / {~ IV ,'5:',' 2 <':,'Z , 7\J A f "-u"U? h A f (;Z /l ,.., If. f. /:l tV cf' A JJ ~ L5A/U1 J C (!f. 0 H ~ C hAM Jt.:~ . r ~ I -, ;- 1/ o w/l..-f-C.,-e /,..." I'--< <!d-'A f~ t/;. c.... ,',.; t "-fi 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effect&cluding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, ~adjacent P, rope, ie~. . "" f' , /.l ,t /.7 -c::... S '01' Ad/4Cc?-A.lt- LJ~")/'JC~A L, ..... . Ii. ,~- V' I' I ,9 ' AN' d t.-.../,:i If -?.A 1/ t:_ /l) (') 4. Or[ 1. A.J' 6 f.' - r;- . ~'? c..'! o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Infill Project- City of Clearw ater . . .1 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) -/I.,~ ~1'-1~!( (/2'kl.f,~/) &v;/lAdd:l,lJA/ ;'f /.-..) htfV2./-'.D/VV vv/fc, -;-c, ~ L3 x, '( f.' "'cJ /f! CO s .. d t? "" < C', cL, g;" fV ,,/- Ex'" ~ t? eel i:.e,!2. <: /.A/l ~ ~ + h"M r!. L.=:>x~/<r6/l... {.A'/r111 D~ ;eo~-f' lINe. AFYtf C.,/t/( <p;v~l rPa/c..LC? ofi.. A,~al'-t ~ c., Cf rA ,'n I'-. A/< I< <? r (/ /i I c.. a G t A 6 {,r {f,'1j r/Z-<) /H.!ff.. f.'c?' >. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. yrz r, f-t, ,'C ,', A Cor-. ~ '" "'- /Ir (Tsf",,--, II' 6//> fo ) /2 2 r; I-/G/ c.-f-.'eJ ^ j , w 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. //~ r -/[,,' 'i Ad d.:.1/'b,.J L.A/(/t( A/.-d +0 c> t-/l /2. tJ-s- ;t!1--z..,JC: CZ A..Ji/ / ' . r ~~ IV f:rv w C?- ~ f>E P,Jcr 14 S' "0 <! Ir L... r~cI .AJ. f" .A 0 /'..f @' FA~'~(7 ..,e(!-5/d~AJt.(? 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. --r-r, I ~. ~ jD /2..D~,"J A- _ (A /;'1-4 v/< ;"'''-J .-1'1- s-f./<..L, c flA,.a.c, r .f~o~ +C;~ s.h~~f t..........; Ii he. A ,...Jfl (-) ,; /I C-o .~~,j~( f~AJf /Vof- t. ~ ^( () ~;J C (!-A, 6(-<.. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~ If ~1 / t, ," J' S M. /b /J /l.-t) -aoJ~a .L. . r-' . I I A-d/ ,T;6..J clo ~S" L:/VIv.JOi ( <..1: ri, c + t..,-,Jd,)7"),./ /i t.. It" o~ +~ .'f ,,>.,~ {~ r~.J1/ Pe.ci7:P!e-vc c' A"c/ Th -" c Lv.,cW,.t(!!& '" c A L.; ~ {", 7. FlexibIlity in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. -j / . _ /7 _ v,,;? SIz.e AA..J~ ~:A;;AJc;o~:'~/:':Jc<.~:~1;; ::f"t;t~~;+<:~~,,~~~ r:.J I- E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMllTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearw ater . . F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable' G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; . Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater . H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible); o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. /~SL~ J5d1rlf ;O-:'::'-------co produced "~;,., RINNE BEllO I 'fi ation. .".\>\ MY . f '!>I'n COMMISSION #00140899 ~.~,~I EXPIRES: AUG 11,2006 Bonded through Advantage No STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ~ ftrn to and subscribed before me this ~ day of ~~ ,A.D. 20~ to me and/or by thO is personally known has ,'C ""\::l~~ as - . ~ 11 Boa4ed 'RIta ' ~ Atlantte IuDdbi& 0..,. -:;C Oln Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development App ication Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater . . AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: k t-:N IV r:'- f-l... /VI s (s'rc: v t.J) A,..J tI (Names of all property owners) ..( {_ (;?!f ~ G~-I(rJO;~ 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ( I C, L..J7.~c1 t.-/A/l-J I<-'IA.~#(/ ~LGCAILl..VAft5/L. F C_ 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) ;2~dtA dlc N 1"/fJ c/Vo.efc ) Sjz:llr:,s~riA-{iL -f'/l-{}/O-r 7,C; I' /l7(.,6~J!-~-A <;,,:><" M(J,f F-OA. A /21')( rt'K.f-, Add.~,1V 1-0 5'1.~(C! ';;A/I-V.'~" A!.L]-\,'r.f'C!AJ(i!. ~ ELF 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner I STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS . ~1 I. .~efo~ me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioneq ~y the laws.<\{ the ~tat~of F)Q,rida, on this b \ day of ~ ' ') r.~ ~ personally appeared ~~~ ~ \.:)i~ who havt\ been first duly sworn Depo"" ,rnl "ys~he ful~ "od,"st"d, the oomeots of the ,ffid,v' thot he/,he " \J..~ '\:\ ~ Notary PUb~ My Commission Expires: "~~\:;!'" LesJip F. Xbvak Wi ~ .~..... ~ :\C:,~W~ Cfl~;:.. I ~. ........ ~ ~'''i MIdIr.... "._, J~ fi-11 S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review 12002 Formslsingle family residential infill application 2002.doc Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater CL WCoverSheet . . FLS2003-04014 119 WINDWARD ISL Date Received: 4/14/2003 GILLESPIE.. KENNETH ZONING DISTRICT: IEOD LAND USE: RU ATLAS PAGE: 268A PAID ~~16~~6 VlS;vj ~ I bO . c-o . . ,,'CI,,~ ..~1(.~LOF TNt. ~~# ~..~~\ ~","T~~~~A ..~L'" "+, ~c.. ~~" I ~".~- ~~{,\ '/ / ~ ~~ .,,~~'::: - '.... 'or::t:~ ~r:: ~ ::-:::::- II "~':.=~-c.'-- ~~ !~';."'''''-== .' ~~ -"'~IfJ"ul"~~.\\ .......~... ,., TE~, ..-- ",~"", CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 May 20, 2003 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Gillespie 119 Windward Island Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: Development Order regarding Case FLS2003-04014 at 119 Windward Island. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gillespie: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On May 15,2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to 5.25 feet as a residential in fill project in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E. The proposal includes a 12-foot by 4.7-foot addition in association with an existing single-family dwelling. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and condition: Bases for approval: 1. The plan complies with the Flexibility criteria for Residential Infill Projects in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay district under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E.2; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with above condition. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received April 14, 2003. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (May 20, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HA\1ILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRA!\K HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bu.L]oNsON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT A,'1D AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . May 20, 2003 Gillespie - Page Two or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, at 727.562.4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. * Make Us Your Favorite! Very truly yours, ~~~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Aex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DROWindward Island 119 GiIlespie\Windward Island 119 DEVELOPMENT ORDER.doc '. . . DRC Meeting Date: Mav 15,2003 Case Number: FLS2003-04014 Agenda Item: 9:45 a.m. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Gillespie PROPERTY LOCATION: 119 Windward Island. REQUEST: The request is to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to 5.25 feet as a residential infill project in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E. The proposal includes a 12-foot by 4.7-foot addition in association with an existing single-family dwelling. ZONING: "IENCOD" (Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District) EXISTING USE: Single-Family Residential ADJACENT LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential Inter-coastal waterway Single-Family Residential The area is dominated by residential uses. STAFF ANALYSIS The 0.23-acre site is located on the east side of Windward Island approximately 250 feet north of Windward Passage in Island Estates Single story ranch style houses dominate the immediate vicinity. All properties are adequately landscaped and properly maintained. The site is occupied by a single-story ranch style house that conforms to the characteristics of the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. The existing 3,200 square foot single-family dwelling was constructed at 5.25-foot side (north) setback. The applicant has constructed a 56 square foot addition to the north side of the property consistent with the existing side building line at 51.25 feet from the property line. The structure is only accessible from within the single-family dwelling and is to be used for storage purposes. There is an existing Page 1 . . wall at the front of the garage utilized to screen the mechanical (air conditioning) and garbage can storage area that buffers the new addition from the street right of way view and the neighboring (north) single family dwelling has a six foot concrete block wall buffering the new addition. The request is to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to 5.25 feet. The redevelopment of this property will make a positive enhancement to the property and surrounding neighborhood. By applying for the Flexible Standard application, the Development Review Committee concluded that the redevelopment of the addition would not negatively impact the characteristics of the neighborhood. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: This property was issued a stop work order for work being done with out permits (CDC2003- 00071). A. COMPLIANCE ISLAND EST A TES NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT (Section 2-1602.E.): STANDARD REQUIRED! EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? DENSITY 7.5 dwelling units One dwelling One dwelling Yes per acre unit unit IMPERVIOUS 0.65 0.50 0.50 Yes SURFACE RATIO (ISR) B. FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE ISLAND EST A TES NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT (Section 2-1602.E): STANDARD PERMITTED! EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 10,200 square 10,200 square Yes (minimum) feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 85 feet 85 feet Yes (minimum) FRONT 15 - 25 feet 25.30 feet 46.5 feet Yes SETBACK REAR 5 - 25 feet 16 feet 16 feet Yes SETBACK SIDE 3 -7.5 feet 5.25 feet 5.25 feet No SETBACK HEIGHT 30 feet Single story 18 feet Yes maximum PARKING Two spaces Four spaces Four spaces Yes Page 2 . . I C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE ISLAND ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT (Section 2-1602.E.2.): I SPACES minimum 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan; The purpose of the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) is "to provide a means of ensuring that infill and redevelopment activities in existing, stable, residential neighborhoods requiring special consideration are consistent with the protection of the existing character of the neighborhood," per Community Development Code Section 4- 608. There are small minorities of properties within Island Estates that have existing sub- standard side setbacks and were within the Low Medium Density Residential Zoning district setback requirements prior to adoption of Island Estates Neighborhood Plan. The applicant's proposal to get approval for an addition constructed without proper building permits in the (north) side setback of his property is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood and the subject property. 2. Single-family detached dwellings and community residential homes with six or fewer residents are the only permitted uses eligible for residential infill projects; The proposed use is a single family, detached residence. 3. The development of redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development standards; In an effort to keep the side building line of the new addition consistent with previously approved additions (5-foot side setback) it out be impractical without deviation for the proposed addition to meet the current IENCOD side setback standard of 7.5 feet. The applicant's proposal to get approval for an addition constructed without proper building permits in the (north) side setback of his property is consistent with the existing character of the neighborhood and the subject property. 4. The development of a parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The subject site is proposed with an addition to an existing single-family residence and is compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed addition should not impact the value of abutting properties. 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses; Adjacent land uses are predominantly single-family residential dwellings. The subject site is proposed with an addition to an existing single-family residence and is compatible with adjacent land uses. Page 3 . . .. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The proposal will result in a home similar in character to other homes in the neighborhood and will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; and The proposal includes a 3,200 square foot single-family residence with an accessory pool/enclosure. The proposal will result in a home similar in size and location to other homes in the neighborhood. In addition, the proposal will also result in the preservation of two large oak trees on the site. It is consistent with the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District and other developments in the area. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater as a whole by developing the last vacant lot in the subdivision. The reductions in setback are similar to other properties in the area. D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The neighborhood is composed of single-story ranch style homes. The proposed addition is in keeping with the existing neighborhood character. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed addition is designed to match the existing house and the overall architectural style of many neighborhood homes. The addition should not reduce the value of adjacent properties. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposal will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the proposed use. The addition is an expansion of a residential home. Page 4 . . 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The addition is expected to have no impact on traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community is generally composed of single-story ranch style homes. The proposed addition is consistent with the architectural style of the existing house and many homes in the general vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The addition is not expected to cause any negative impacts for adjacent properties. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes that the proposed addition complies with the standards of the Community Development Code and the Flexible Standard Development criteria for the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay district. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the request by Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Gillespie to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to 5.25 feet for the purpose of constructing a 56 square foot addition at 119 Windward Island with the following conditions: Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: · J) 2X- W~ _ Joll chodtler, Development Review Specialist S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Windward Island 119 Gillespie\Windward Island 119 report. doc Page 5 . . These are the preliminary comments generated by the DRC. Your case will be reviewed on May 15th by the DRC at 10:00 a.m. You must attend. Additional comments will be generated at this meeting. Again, the comments below are preliminary. 10:00 Case: FLS2003-04014- 119 Windward Island Owner! Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Gillespie. Location: 0.23-acres located on the east side of Windward Island approximately 250 feet north of Windward Passage in Island Estates Atlas Page: 268A Zoning: IENCOD, Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District. Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to six feet as a residential infill project in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E. Proposed Use: The proposal includes a 12-foot by 4.7-foot addition constructed in association with an existing single-family dwelling. Neighborhood Association(s): Island Estates Neighborhood Association. Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 2. Stormwater: a) No comments 3. Traffic engineerim!: a) No comments 4. General engineering: a) No comments 5. Planning: a) No comments 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: Send comments to Kenneth Gillespie at gillespiesteve@msn.com. DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1. an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (May 15,2004). 2. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. . . "",111, . "~~~LOF Tift", \t4.. ~,,""""',~X-- \ ~ ".' ,,"'.;;l.:':. ..\~~ \ I, '. " '::. ~.. ",,~lj-....""'.~, .,'., , . .. :~~~~(..,.......,'.c"""".""'" . c::c; ..c;.~ ....... Q~ ...... ':. ". .~.,. . ;:;::;~ -~-- ...... ..~';\ -:. '/"1:rw, "',..... .\ -... rYJ #1#..'- ~Vt\" ###)1TE~".. · "l'" CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 April 28, 2003 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICA TION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 119 Windward Island (FLS2003-04014) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 119 Windward Island, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The request is to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to 5.25 feet as a residential infill project in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E. The proposal includes a 12-foot by 4.7-foot addition in association with an existing single- family dwelling. On May 15,2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staft) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application. The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application. You may contact me by telephone at 727-562- 4604 or by email at ischodtl@clearwater-fl.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting (May 15,2003). An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, ~,~~ J~~chodt1er Development Review Specialist S:\Planning DepartmenflC D B\Standard FleXIPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Windward Island 119 Gillespie\Windward Island 119 N otificationLette r. doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOlT HAMILTON. CO~lMISSIOt\ER FRA.'1K HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER G) BILL JONSON, CO~I~IISSIOt\ER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT A;\lD AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . ~~~€(G~~ ..~\.~jJ'1">T~?/j'~ ~::;::." I ~~;-... ...~Z,,\ 1/ .. d ,,~~ ~....IJ'~""'l ...~\ === !;:i... "1"': ~ - L5::'~ ..~ ~-===- "'j~ -:'.a)/~"-.-Pt~J """:r4TE~, ).~l '~~Tfl't CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 loNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW April 21, 2003 Mr. & Mrs. Kenneth Gillespie 119 Windward Island Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: Application for Flexible Standard Development to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to 5.25 feet as a residential infill project in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E. The proposal includes a 12-foot by 4.7-foot addition in association with an existing single-family dwelling. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gillespie: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to six feet as a residential infill project at 119 Windward Island and determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS 2003-04014. The Development Review Committee (ORC) will review the application for sufficiency on May 15, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4604 or email at ischodtl@clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely yours, -~ J n Schodtler Development Review Specialist S:\Planning DepartmenflC D B\Standard FleiIPending CasesV - Upfor the Next DRC\Windward Island [[9 Gillespie\Windward Island [[9 complete. doc BRIAN). AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BIU.jONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . Schodtler, John From: Sent: To: Subject: Geoffrey C. Weber [gweber2@tampabay.rr.com] Thursday, May 01 , 2003 8:26 AM jschodtl@clearwater-fl.com FW: 119 Windward Island - FLS2003-040 14 -----Original Message----- From: Geoffrey C. Weber [mailto:gweber2@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 8:25 AM To: jschodtil@clearwater-fl.com Subject: 119 Windward Island - FLS2003-04014 Can you email or mail to me information, drawings, etc... about the referenced property addition? Thanks Geoffrey C. Weber, CPA 100 Windward Island Clearwater, Florida 33767 727-449-1476 1 . . February 7,2000 James & Donna Gunther 61 Windward Island Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS 99-12-73 at 61 Windward Island Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gunther: On January 27, 2000, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for a reduction in rear setback from 10 feet to seven feet for a proposed spa/hot tub. The DRC unanimously recommended approval of the proposal subject to the following conditions: 1) That a hedge or climbing vine be planted along the existing chainlink fence on both property lines; 2) That the requirements of the Building Code be met with respect to any alterations of the seawall; and 3) That appropriate erosion control measures are provided during construction. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard development with the three conditions as stated above. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve that applicant of the necessity to obtain any building permits that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses which require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry at 562-4558. Sincerely yours, Ralph Stone Planning Director - - -.--;-----.::------.-.- --- - - -.-:- - -- - - -.----...,---.-.---. -.--;;----- - - -- .................,...... Q90.1Z Co42.l4 ~cq 3.7t ~cq .S;'6 4$ 7. z..6 ~ C)5 .(JD Co/~ 2L:'1S . G~ S-~.Cl:' 733..70 ~S;l30. '2D S~ ~ 10, 2--00 5 -f .. , S-o . So ~ ~ L-ot s:" c-- )~U- fA \16tS ~'?><t. \b "3/1.1 c:, - S"S \ . q l .----- . . Community Response Team Planning Oept. Cases - ORC Case No. ~L .5 ::2()()-1- 0 Y/)/...S- Meeting Date: Ui >/ .I S-' 0:3 Location: //9 ~~( J/>)r:/ijL:7/0/- ,z-(-'/?L /) ~ / lJ Current Use: #r. ( ;,0/('" /1 //r::( ~ lJ Active Code Enforcement Case (no) yes: (' n r-= ,;J on.3 -- DrY) / / /?7 //c' e Co c' L c:-:c~ lJ Address number (tII.} (no) (vacant land) lJ Landscaping ~ (no) lJ Overgrown (yes) (fi lJ Debris (yes) (~ lJ Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) . lJ Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) (vacant land) ~//~ / /C/70va..7...e 0 L lJ Fencing (none) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) lJ Paint (s;rJJ. (fair) (poor) (garish) lJ Grass Parking (yes) .. lJ Residential Parking Violations (yes) (C) lJ Signage ~ (ok) (not ok) (billboard) lJ Parking ~ (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) lJ Dumpster ~ ....I8fj-d'} (not enclosed) lJ Outdoor storage (yes) (II; Comments/S!9,tus Re~ort (attach any pertinent documents):. ?t ~ ~'.// '=.tC2 r /:'( .r,-- ~/"/ ( ,C/ /) CJ {it{? /J r- q "c? .I ~ c; I? / / //'/lrnl /,-:~ to /?S fA / -..i-A 0 C ' -/ .(;JtP r /YJ / kS: - '-""'" / Date: ~_.- Reviewed by, j '-~, {~4~Phone:S(~ - <Y7~ Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 i~ <~ ~~\D I-<~ ~ l;) 0;1; =: i5Z\D ~~p=~~ ~>8ciC ~~fJ)~~ =:l:L18......~ <fJ)_~ ~Zd'~!C u~S2ii~ f;I;; p.. .-ltJ N o ~ 5 ~~ i:l::\OO'-' ?' j:!:N c: fJ)-.:rr-- UO~@i ~r.tl& ~u- -~ ~Et p..O UI-< -~ ~p.. ~ <( :E :E ::) en w ~ o ..J en - "'(-0 .....0:: 0<( 0;: ~C oz o- N;: (0) 0"'(- 0"'(- . C") o o N -- It) ~ .q- o U 'i: ...1:) So!! .cLLl :!::di ~ c (I):C c: o ::s "10 Cl ., .E = (I)., .Q::s ClU ,E .E a;~ .,- o 0 LL1E3: o:euici3 f{l.,g~ -1;=0 -I Ul (.)0 S c X,O:: ==:8~~ :I: :c ';: B w I- ., 0 .- .J LL1COUlCo. Z E ,- co zoe'fi@ (I) ~ ~ ~~ 0. ~ r- \0 r-- l:L1....:l~ E;::fJ)....:l fJ)-~ 1115~~ ~d~~ ., c:>?" < ~ > ~~ -I-< ~ ~ ~ < co ....:l 0\ r.tl z ~ _....:l i=l-U ~ !C p.. r-- fJ)....:l~ 5ga....:l g~~ :E~~ is < ~~~ ~~d ..... a> c ~ o cD cD (.) (.) c c 00 00 :J ::s III III .!!! .!!! - - 'E 'E ..... ..... a> a> 0.0. a> a> ..... ..... .e.e a> a> .0.0 C> C> C C '(3 '(3 c c a> a> E E E E 8 8 ~ ~ ..... ..... o 0 ~~ - - a> a> ::E::E . III III 00 00 III III C C o 0 U U a> a> 0. 0. III III .5 .5 ..... ..... a> a> .l;; .c - - o 0 ..... ..... o 0 ~ ~ ..... ..... o 0 ~ ~ a> a> .l;; .l;; - - '0 '0 c c o 0 :.;::; :.;::; a> a> a. a. E E 8 8 c c o 0 0. 0. :J :J C C o 0 U U a> a> 0. 0. III III .5 .5 ro ro c c l;:: l;:: 00 00 - - III III a> a> :J :J 0".0". ~ ~ ~ ~ -c-c rocroc .l;;OO.l;;OO III E III E C~C~ a> a> a> a> C>EOlE 00._ 00._ - - .!!! oo.!!! 00 .l;;c.cc ......- .....- o .0 . - - lin: Iii 'E '01::'0..... -a>-a> ,g o.,g 0. - >-- >- .- .0 .- .0 E'OE'O a> a> a> a> 0..= 0..= a> :J a> :J .c0".l;;0" I-~I-~ -a; ::E - a> ::E ....., ....., ....., ....... o 0 0 0 zz ii)'z z .5 ... .~ ~ .f 00 00 ':; 00 ~ ~ .~ .~ &! .~ OM ()()or-() i=_ 00 a> a> or- a> o~~~~ ~~~~~~ o o ,... MM fd~ c~ - N fd c or- fd c >- alu l!!:E o~ c Q. Ul C "C G) > 'Qj u 00 & '8 0 +' 0 W c c () o 'i;j a> i= a "a. ~ 5 'C E ::E u 0 ~ Klo c <C ;> 2 1/)(1) "C'- (I) .- .0 c:I/)(I) u..... roc:1/) .sl~ I/)O~ :EE 5~(I) el/) Eiiic'ij ro (I) "Co..... :2-g "C a. I/) ro l:l ro"C.9 1/)_ Ec:o (l)ro oro.c: e > c.. 'g. IV 0>0 en ..!!! :5 ~~o~ ==E '"' 0 C>.- == "C . .c: .s ~ .~ ~ ~ I/)C/)~ E ro"C~ u;.... ~~O> ~.E ('0. I/) tE 'S _'~ .... ~ 0 L. .9 . 0 (I). ul/).... C/)c.. ro oC: -- ..... <( l:l ._ B c: C/) 5~'c ~~ U a. ro 0.'- -I/).c: oE. .... c: U 'Qj.o~ (1).- (I) (I) >:J E c: .... E I/) (I) I/) .... ~~__Bo;:~ >-~ ~ (I) 1\1 ~ .... "EEE-g(l)-g~ c.. (I) U U '0. ro 'S o a.~ .... I/) 1/).0 . .... "5 (I) ~..!!! O>"i:: c.. c.. 0 cii c: ==.~ (I) 0 '.c: c::JC> ~ c:<( C:~:C(l)(I)f!~~ 0>==;;:::>.....0 .- .,. :J - (I) '"' > ~ g>.o $ en c: 50 0.'- .. c: 0 Z Qj I/) (1):5 0>"C I/) "C (I) E .- c: (I) "C .~ 0 "C :J ~ :i2 "C (I) (l)E.2u..........2:J .....(I)uo(l)OUI/) i:i5 .... .~ "C ::E ~ .~ !!!. M o --- 00 --- .... M S2 00 ~ .... M o --- 00 --- .... M S2 00 t:! .... ~ ~ u ::E ~ ~ o ~ o . ~ (/)(I)n; 0..: :2<(:5"C_ ,:E m~ c:~-o ~ "9- 'o.,g ~ ~ fij .;,) 1/):J~(I)iij o .- ~ I/) ~ U - - :> -: = = ...... >-"C >- :> ~ (9 .- ..:::'.0 .... a. ~_ ..:~g-Q)~E >-0 :Ec:oc:"C8 o (I) . ro U ~ .~ Z .!:: ~ I/) 0 0 :> .9 :J "" C'l..... 0:> o tT .M c:"C.....0> ~ ..... (I) I/) 0>'3: (I)..... T"" ro (I)....~<b :=C:T"""C I/) I/) E<Df!J!!(I)..... , c:ro......,-"C I/)roo O~(I) I/) (I) (l)T"" a. 0.&:1\ c: ro .... ..... I/) I/) ~ "C ~ 0 .c: (I)'(ij ro ~ E ~'o.. g> Q) ~ c: .c: .~ (1)'- 1/)._ c: I/) 0 .... ..... a. 6- ~ ~ ::.~ "C ~ Q) ro (1)'- 0 0 a. c: ~ =~~~~~8~0 B 0 :J >.!!l (I) 'ro , ..,- c: 0.(1)..... a."C.c::= L()=.9U5lrle~~ro T"" -c:.... ~ c.. 1/)'- E o oE.c: I/)U ..t :2 ..... 0 U I ,- ..... ~ ~~~~ro5~~!E " '"'l:l(l)"C~~(I)t &:1\ fij c: 01 c: U .- (I) ~ ororo(l)c..g.u ,~ -g ~ ~ I/) IF ~ U E IF ~ (I) (l)E ~.~ _x "9- e (I) I/) ,",'(I)"",,:!::- =(I)C:"CC:O::>I/)"C Q) 0:5 8 (I) ~ -0 oa.....B U _ .- > " c: (I) 0 -.;;; '"' ..:z - > ..... ro u (I) ~ <( 0 c: .!2 ~ I/) (I) (I) E 'E !!!. (I) a. (/) EO.!:: 0:: 0 .... Q) <( ~ E I .c: I I/) (l)E.....:O> 0 = "C 0 = (I) a. ~ 'n; "C U ro .- ..... ro "C.... E (I) .... o"C(I)uro.E"C > .E (I) .c:(I) '9- (I) E ~ ~ ro 'Q) ~ c: w c: U ,- - U U 0"C (I) 0 (I) (l)u:J (I) (I) .c: 'n; ;:.c: iU .c: ~ 0> 0:: .c: c..1/)(9c...c:()I/)~- () M o --- o .... --- M M ~ 00 .... --- C'l M o --- o .... --- M M S2 C'l t:! M 01 c: '3: ~ "C "C 'n; I/) (I) '0.. I/) ~ o ..: :E--:- .~ L()(I) 0>(1) M~ 0>..... I >< <D(I) <Dc: ..,-..... @'E .~ Q) 0.0. 1/)- ~"5 =0- (90 (I)..... >.~ ~(I) (/).0 E~ . e (I) ~-.c: E'ffi"C Q) 0 c: O-(I)ro (I) c: (I) >0..... ~.c:..!!! uo-O- ro "C E .... Q) 0 .E>u ~'Q) ..... U 0 I/) (I) Q) 0 .c:o::E () -ro M o --- Iii C'l --- M M o --- 00 --- ..,- M o --- .... ~ M M o --- 0'1 --- .... M S2 .... C'l --- M M ~ .... --- M M S2 C'l t:! M u ::g ~ ~ o .J c 0 ~ c ~ 0 ....0 1:; '0 c c c c ....0::: CI) > 0 0 0 0 g~ Co 'iii 'iii 1:; 1:; 1:; 1:; I/) - ..5 CI 0 0 0 CI) CI) CI) CI) ~o c CI) CI) CI) Co Co Co Co 'iii ~ (.) c c I/) I/) I/) I/) oz ;l :g 0 0 c c c c 0- :E CI) ~ ~ 'Cjj &! &! &! ""3: :::E z a.. a.. 0:: 00) 0.... 0.... u ::g ~ u ::g ~ u ::g ~ u ::g ~ u ::g ~ ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ o ..... 0- .... ~ ro E E :J C/) .E c: :;:::: I/) E .... .E - Z ::s c.. c.. - u.: . N ~ ~_ ~_ S'/<//@ Ck. ~ ~ ~ (hA~ ;;2~ ~tJ.u3 ~ ;;J1e ~ . :;~~' r::: Lj ~( 0 (}AJJ: MJv~ ~ ~ - ~~ p ~ 7~ ~. "I I ~ '"" Charles & Jan Nagy * . Island Estates I 116 Windward Island Clearwater, FL 33767-2323 * L/tf t.{ -- Li ~ 77 (I.lY.Lirr~ j~.Q~f)..LOF Tilt .......~ ,~\1~ ~II"X.r..,~, ~~,~ ~ :'f~, ,.' '*B~ .,.-~":.. ll~~(' d I <?hrJR\ ~ i. ~~ill.- "', '~!li -. ==-- ,....".,~ ""~';;,==- :--..IIlI,' ...~u-~__ ~Io. ";.~~~.. - " ~,'o/ -~. .....-~~,. ~ ~~ tpt,,'Cc'JJJ~~~'t ~...- .~TE", jjti ~'~~J~i' , CITY OF CLEARWATER LoNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PIANNING DEPARTMENT Pr)~;T OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDINy, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 oYrl~ ~. ~0~ RE: NOTICE. OF FILING OF AN APPLICA nON FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOP;.::-~:','_ APPROVAL AT 119 Windward Island (FLS20 3-04014) April 28, 2003 To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 119 Windward Island, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The request is to reduce the side (north) setback from 7.5 feet to 5.25 feet as a residential infill project in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District under the provisions of Section 2-1602.E. The proposal includes a 12-foot by 4.7-foot addition in association with an existing single- family dwelling. On May 15, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance the City's Community Development Code. Following that- review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application. The City encourages you to participate in the review process of thi~ application. You may contact me by' telephone at 727-562- 4604 or by email at ischodtl@clearwater-fl.com for further information, visit our offic.e t~ review ~he files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the applIcatIOn. " An appeal of the !decision"of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners '; within the required notice . area wh~ rre.sent competeT}t substantial eviden~e a~, or ~rior to, the j Development ReVIeW Comrmttee meetmg-Mi.\.) 15,2003)" An appeal must be flIed, mcludmg an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seve~j clays of the date of the Development Order. Tl1ank you for YQur interest in the Cityiaf Clearwater's development review prqcess. Please do not he~it~te ,to cont~ct. me should you hav~, ~y questions. You may access our PlannR~~~nt through '''I CIty S webslte. www.c1e~ater-fl.com.K......-.iC::.1 VE:, S~l\lcerely, , . . _ fvJAy , D ~ # ~~ . * ~ 2,5 d,{)tJ;5; 1 .1 i/J03 J6~ChOdtler .. ,. C~NNING D D4velopment ReVIew SpeCIalIst 1y OF CLt:~UtrMl:::1v : S:\Planning Departmen^C D B\Standard FleX\Pending ~ases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Windward Is/and 119 Gillespie\Windward IS~l:P .,. , , NotificationLetter, doc " BRJAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BILL)ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAtEMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1,1 r ....... ":f"' , ,