FLD2003-11061
e-
@ IL-t. '~~ L--
~ -
~.
-
..Lar
-
ORIGINAL
FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Date Received: 11/20/2003
DABIRI OFFICE BUILDING
ZONING DISTRICT: 0
LAND USE: R/OL
ATLAS PAGE: 292A
PERMITS
229-03
.......
e
Keith Za ac & Associates
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Plan
OR\G\NAl
TO:
Mr. Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33758
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
[X) Attached
[ ] Shop Drawings
[ ] Copy of Letter
[ ] Under Separate Cover via
[X) Prints
[ ] Change Order
(j) IL1 ";v'~ L-
PERMITS
229-03
'---
f--~~l1lv~'.
. ,..-.. 1 ~~lm)e Pkwy, Ste 205
FEB _ 5 ~iMr.ty It.a~~~r, FL 34695
. fW1) 7 U> 88 Phone
727 7 - 55 Fax
ol.com
P&.Aa"NING & OEVE
CnYOF C
DATE:
JOB #:
02.05.04
229-03
Dabiri Office
RE:
[X) Plans
[ ] Specifications
[ ] Samples
[X] See Below
15 02.05.04 Si ed & sealed lans
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
15 02.05.04 Cover letter address in Ci comments
Exhibit "C" - Responses to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
15 02.05.04 Criteria
15 02.05.04 Signed & sealed MODRET ANALYSIS and GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below:
[X) For approval [] Reviewed, no comments
[X) For your use [] Reviewed, comments as noted
[ ] As requested [] Returned for corrections
[ ] For review and comment
REMARKS:
cc:
] Resubmit _ copies for approval
] Submit _ copies for distribution
] Return _ corrected prints
IGNED:
E: Alex L. Azan, P.E.
I Sr. Project Manager
II Keithzayac3@aol.com
~K:t~JTHZA,*"G & ASSO~TESJING.
C.JVllENGINEcR.JNG
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
February 5, 2004
Mr. Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33758
RE: 117 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD FLD2003-11061
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
Enclosed please find 15 sets of revised plans and attachments addressing DRC comments received
dated January 29,2003 including the following items:
Stormwater
A. The stonnwater calculations on sheet 6 have been revised to include only 50% credit for
existing impervious area.
B. The mitered end section connection to the existing Drew Street swale is shown on sheet 6. A
mitered end section detail is shown on sheet 8.0.
C. The drawdown calculations for the treatment volume have been added to sheet 6. Also
included are 15 copies of the soils report.
D. The control structure detail has been added to sheet 8.0. A standard FOOT index callout has
been added to the structures shown on sheet 8.
Traffic EnQineerinQ
A. The driveway closest to McMullen Booth Road has been revised to a one way in only
driveway. The second driveway has been revised to a two way driveway.
C. The parking provided calculation has been corrected on the site plan.
D. A loading space has been added to the parking lot.
F. It is noted that a traffic impact fee will be due before C.O.
General Enaineerina
A. A right of way permit will be obtained.
B. A health department pennit will not be required for a single service connection. An FDEP
pennit will be obtained for the sewer connection.
C. The dumpster has been revised and a City standard detail provided on sheet 8.1.
,., .~
It
e
D. There will be no medical office use in the proposed building. Therefore the backflow preventor
has been revised to a DDCY.
PlanninQ
A. Enclosed are 15 copies of an addendum to the application addressing the comprehensive infill
flexibility criteria.
B. A dimension has been added from parking lot to Drew Street.
C. Pages 5 and 6 were noted as complete at DRC.
Solid Waste
A. The dumpster angle was noted as appropriate at DRC.
B. A City standard dumpster detail has been added to sheet 8.1.
Land Resources
A. The parking lot layout and grading has been revised to save the existing 30" pine tree.
B. A cross section has been added to sheet 6 showing the grading of the parking lot around the
30" pine tree.
C. The plans have been revised to preserve additional trees, and the tree removal tabulation has
been revised on sheets 4 and 9.
D. The parking lot layout has been revised to save the requested oaks, and the removal of the
tree at the NW corner. The tree removal tabulation has been revised on sheets 4 and 9.
E. Additional trees have been added to the survey and plans.
F. The revisions noted have been added to all plans.
G. The oaks is being removed
H. The retention pond has been revised to save the 6" oak at SW corner.
I. The water service has been relocated away from the 8" sand pine.
K. A tree preservation plan will be provided prior to building permit.
Fire
A. A FDC has been added as required on sheet 7.
B. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
C. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
D. The water mains and hydrants are existing. Clearances as noted are maintained in the
proposed design.
.._- 4... '. -r
e
.
E. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
F. A "no parking, fire department connection" sign has been added to sheet 5.
G. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
H. FDC, existing hydrant and underground piping is identified on sheet 7. Utility details have
been added to utility detail sheets.
I. Ingress/egress radius has been revised to 28 feet.
Landscapina
A. Irrigation notes have been revised as requested. An irrigation plan will be prepared and
forwarded with a letter of transmittal.
B. The hedges on the south and east property lines have been revised to Vibumum.
C. An additional viburnum hedge and five Drake Elms have been added to the west property line.
A Vibumum and India Hawthom hedge has been added to the north property line.
D. The proposed plants within the visibility triangles have been revised to India Hawthorn.
E. It is a proposed tree and has been labeled.
F. The sidewalk has been revised to 4.0 ft in width.
G. Wheel stops have been added to the perimeter parking spaces. In addition all landscape
areas are protected by 6" curbing.
H. The Magnolia trunk specification has been changed from DBH to caliper.
I. "Multi-stem" has been added to the Crape Myrtle specification.
J. The size specifications for the proposed trees have been revised to conform to code.
M. Additional wet soil tolerant plants have been added to the south side of the building along the
proposed stem wall.
N. Additional foundation plantings have been added to north, west and south side of building as
required.
ite triangles have been revised to 20' x 20'.
.
r"-~' ".....
~ Clearwater
-~
\.J~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater. Florida 33756 .
Telephone: 727.562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
I:J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
I:J SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated. 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
I:J SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE S
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPl\1ENT APPLICATION
(Revised] )/05102)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: MR. ~ M;!.~. /lIltr=>S<.I..JD DABIRI
MAILING ADDRESS: 302.'-( ti~'It:ef"Z>~D t:>~{ve C(c.-"~^-rt;;l!:, F L 357~1
PHONE NUMBER: ( 7 2. 7) 726 8 7 B 7
FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
M ~ 55u,", D DI\ ~l e, 'f"
(Must in:::b~.., ALL owners)
I-/lA Lov.$<::: Dttgl ~ I
AGENT NAME:
Kc: 17H
ZA 0.( ~
A :'S<>C.IA "tt:;5 ~c..
,
MAILING ADDRESS: 10 I PH (<' \ ? ?~
PHONE NUMBER( 1 Z 1) l~ 3 tj 8. 9 8
PA~~\NA,<, 51.1rT~ 20.5;- 5/1Fe.T( f-(1t1CJ.~O~" (=(. 3l..{b"S
FAX NUMBER: ( I Z 7 ) /"3 9855
E-MAIL ADDRESS: K"~17H ~I\'(",c @ ItOL. (olY\
CELL NUMBER:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPME.'H INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS: I ( 1 M( MULLt:lJ 6oD-rH RD. c:<....t"'~wl'r'"tef(
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 5 t::e: PUt N S
PARCEL NUMBER: I b ! z ~/ I 61 ( 'i'l2 6 ( 0 0 0 I DOLO
PARCEL SIZE: 0.66 ~~ +/- Z~..... 085 :sf.
(acres, S7...<o-:; feet)
PROPOSEDUSE(S)ANDSIZE{S): 11.6.34 s+ cftl'ce .pullc:t;~
(nu~ ':I ="""'hng uni'.s, hole! rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
rtlr>"! 2.$' h> \0'
3) I "(rGc&.~ bvilcli"" k.t(~~.1
\) 'et~ ~+ !;;~fhc.ck ~(Ol'l" Dr~ $~+ ~ ~4j Lc.lI.e
(L"d.f".JI:" reques1l;C code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, <.:1:)
2.) e.&.ut! s.u .kf-heulc. a(Ort resiclcn~l Yo"",, 20' '+b /.D'
tr"'" 30' ~ 3~. b'
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):
~~ 1 of 6 - F'Ex.OIe ~Iopment Application - City of Clearwater
: .
,('''~:'''.
.
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents) .
C.
C:!
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
:p ~Y(lJ cl51
D.
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
CJ
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, if! detail:
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony WIth the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located. d
-r~ yn>r~ ~"elop~ is. cVS~f'l..t' ,'r- t4.C€o...dc..I'\U fc,> taloL
~u~tc{t .'+k re~....d otlrt'" r"c..~"\o well lo~-tl..t
2.bl'\.:~ ~s low
l SO .>. I 5" (''0
1.
2. The proposed development will not hi~ider or discourage the ilppropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. -r1
(~ f'r-eoo~ c4Yelof~ Ls SlA."""'~ ~'1 -t~~ ,9{,.~ 0.'"4
"" f1 (. '" c..o{ ;.:. -ft,. 1 ~ Cno. -h-A. '"' .. t ( " "", 1\ ,es tt-.
w.(.;( D.( -1l..t o-tl..er pr"b~t'~h~)
3. The proposed development will not ;;:-'~ly affed the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the propos<:,d
use.~1 .. _u J I r
II"f f"'" pC7.><.Q d NeJ.c.? r><...V'\.!r IS ~y("n.t Ii qld c+fic ~ OCC"'fc-n..Ci aNi -Iw>"~ t"" ~ e
k~c; r1.o t:..t{v-(,.~ atfte+ t.1'\ ~ cfk"U' ft> -\~ SOJ~ 0" -{~ r~5id.('vr.c.(: .to i~ e~+
4. The proposed development is de~'~ to minimize t-affic congestion. __I ..
("'E' f ro? t>s<.J
to.... .35 p~;.., 5~ e>.;.J j~ ls se.....(~ ~~ Me Millie..,
-tl...t"t:~ JoJO ~"c..fftt l''''''';l:.c.fs a.~ t')(P~'
de..,.,elof~ ~tt50 ("4fX"1""'-"~
~~ 'e4. ~ D"t>_ ~~;.
5. The proposed development is consis:.~ 'Nith the cor.lmunity character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development
TL..t f("~?O~ dR'a:IOf~~ IS 0... o~.~ b...~ld\V\~
e. 01- a.~ -t~f..rr.e ~~~("'* COW\"'~"I
6. The design of the proposed develo;r~ minimizes acverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation imP<ds.
on adjacent properties. ___(
( ~ ~~~ ~~ bu;~~-l'\.'3 do~ ...ot 'l11udt'1 o't'" ot~I"WI'~
I:-{fec+ +~ S""rv'OJ...d.;~s" Tkt ~....J&....J. e,'.oO M"\ ~ S": oD PIV\ ""oyb~ ko.Jr,s
" , ~ ~ti. ,. ....- i'o vS w ,-f<.t. i" ~ ~ Ca '""'"' V f\"~ ..
CJ Address the applicable flexibility c:i'e:;; b- the s~ land ur.e as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use se,.ara1e
sheets as necessary) - Explain !:!2:!! 7Ie"'.a is ~, in ~il:
Pl.~~~ sa KrTA~+{E:;-n EXtlr~l-r "At' au ~d.t.tc.td S-;d..t Se-t~" ~ Zo' +w lO~
R.td..w:.tJ F~t ~.f-~ ~ 2c)' ~ (D': l",.cr~e.iUl' b\J;lclt~ J-el"jk-l ~ ~o' ~ ~.S'
;:-d7- 2 ci 6 - Poe.tibIe ~"elopment Application - City of Clearwater
! ,
, "
E.
i/
p/
~
~
....:...':....
e
.
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
TREE SURVEY {including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parldng standards lie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be
in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to
the parldng standards are apprOVed;
0/ GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permIts will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ SITE PLAN with the following inforTr.<t.i:ln (not to exceed 24' x 36'):
,/ All dimensions;
;:7' North arrow;
/" Engineering bar scale (minimum sr..ale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
----;;.- Location map;
----:;..- Index sheet referencing indrvidual sheets included in package;
-- Footprint and size of all EXISTlt.G buildings and structurcs;
----;;;'" Footprint and size of all PROPOS~ buildings and structures;
-7 All required setbacks;
/' All existing and proposed points ci access;
.,/ All required sight triangles;
./' Identification of environmentally u~,;que areas, such as w-dlercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and ..../.;;;tion of understory. ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private e:<:semenls;
Location of all street righls-of-w<rfNithin and aejacent to the site;
Location of existing public anlj ~.crte utilities. including flrc hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parldng spaces, drive....Clys. ~ing areas anlj vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crossr.a'.:t'oing of all required pan<lng lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste cor1'.ar~, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screenirog (per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index ~j~};
Location of all landscape ~.aI:
Location of all on site and offsit!: s:.:..rm-water ~.anagerncnt facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting f~es: and
Location of all existing and ~0''''.JY:d sidewalr.s.
L.
,-
-L
./
--:::;::.-
-:::::--
/
"../'"
1iJa/
TO SITE DATA TABLE for existing, r€:q'K~, and pro;>osed devEflopment, in writtenltabular form:
'-L Land area in square feet and ~'='S;
--L' Number of EXISTING dweni~ U-~;
-L Number of PROPOSED dwelli-t; :roits;
/" Gross floor area devoted to ea7. ,~.
~ Parking spaces: total number, ;r~ed in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
---JC Total paved area, including at;.?~ pamng ~ces anf,j driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehio..:lar area;
----L" Size and species of allland~ ~.ateriaJ:
...L Official records book and ~ rJ.r-uers of aU existing utollty easement;
....L Building and structure heigh's,
-L Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.Rj: and
-L Floor area ratio (FAR.) for aI r....rresidential L'SeS.
~ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 h X ~ 1) and COior render.-.g if possible;
o
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ON: /oO.E, prCNidE l'le following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot eievar.T!S on site.
Offsite elevations if required to e"*.:ate the 'prJposed slomlwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water re'.i:tiTog walls cnC earth ~s;
Lot lines and building lines (d'r.~);
Streets and drives {dim~t:
Building and structural se~ I~r.
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a .~ artlorisr, c:J at tt~ 8' DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition ci t.v.tI trees.
:;...~ 3 ci 6 - Flexitlle Vevelopment Application - City of Clearwater
. .
, G.
.
t;1)
....lC
,/
-:7
/'
/
-..........-
~
0
H.
~
~
---:7
2-
-L
-
..L
--L"
---/'
--/
IlL A.
~
\i.
0
0
I.
~
if.
J.
.-''''","~
e
.
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
STORMWATER PLAN including the following requiremonts:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality:
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on nil plans and calculations
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMm AL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas in::loding swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of aE required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking s;;a::es;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent 10 the sl1e. by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description. spec&;atjons and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees. ~ms. shrubs and grovnd cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hat~ and/or sh~ed and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous de',eb;r.-::nt approval (eg. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE Pl.}.-'; l:; scale (8 '/, X 11) (CQIo( rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (requirec hi' ;e.'al tNO anc t'vee approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSC~ =-ROGRAM applicallO'1, as applicable.
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the ap~...rJl includes a d€'velopment where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown DiSh:ts) or as
part of a Comprehensive In1il ;::.",,".k~pment Project Of' a Residential'nfill Project.
BUILDING ELEVATION DRA'"m.S5 - all sid"'5 of all buIldings including height dimensions, colors and malerials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEV;... iQ..S - four ~ of buildIng with colors and materials to scale (8 is X 11) (black and white and coO:lr
rendering, if possible) as requi.-~_
o HI A All EXISTING freestanding 8."C ~oed signs: ?rovide ;*>otographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they wiP !:Ie
removed or to remain.
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o N I II, All PROPOSED freestanding ir~ a::actled ~; Provide details including location, size, height, oolors, materials and drawing
o HIA Comprehensive Sign Progrcr.; iO"..r..2tion, as a;lpIicable (separate application and fee required).
o NI A Reduced signage proposal (8 ~ X ~.) (coIor1. l su!>mit:lng Comprehensive Sign Program application.
~~ .c of 6 - Rexoie ~velopment Application - City of Clearwater
["~
e
'.
'.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
r:;t Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that aU representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knOWledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
describ d in is application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELlAS 'iO
om to and subscribed before......JTle this .1Z!L. day of
. A.D. 20(L,2- to me and/or by
. who is personally known has
as
r-4",e 5 of e - Fexi!:>Ie ~Iopment Application - City of Clearwater
,,,J.....'
..,;<
. M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
DAP,l ~rl MAAShUf)
DPr B \ r2. \ M.A. \...nUS &
(Names of all property owners~
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title hokler(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
I ''1 "-.)I~I H MCJlWUA.-N &X)T ft .12..DA-f)
CL~Af2-1~AT~, FLof2-{D~
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
581" &?:,p.,C\L I ~EJ bH-T ( P^~ t-.\(-:'! VAe.ff:A1Ce. A-U- t..e.-()Of3;A;!fU)
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) ap~in:ed and (does/do) appoint: M~.?l ETH ZAYAC.. P. E...
~17---1TH TAYI\-L A<.~n ~X:;.J.t>.\r-S \~c..
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any pe7jons or other 60cuments necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed 1::l induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the ~ des:::ri:>ed in this application;
\ \
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authort.y, ~...reby cel'".ry::-:at the foregoing is true and C02~. "7 . /J ~
...-. - ~A~ '-~ ...;J
Property OwneY7/;/" n ' _ / . ""
Property ~ (yt.1-p-l.., L
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly ~issiorle(j...by ':he laws of the State of Florida, on this tJCyJ. 11 , JtfJ 3 day r:J
IC]-t'-- ,~()o3 personally ~,.P.a"ed ((~" ~d Dr' \ "to I; c. eV1 ,s-c who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully un~"lCs the corroen:s of the affidavit that he/she signed. . -() .
? ~~PUbliC
a
ooc
My Commission Expires:
~ 6 d 6 - F1eztlIe o-elopment Appration - City of Clearwater
e
.
Exhibit "A"
New Office Building, 117 North McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, Rorida
Parcel No. 16129/16119926100010010
Rexible Development Application
Zoning and Land Use DRC variance request
The above mentioned site's geographic location and size in relation to the future zoning ordinance causes undo
restriction on the development of the site. Therefore, the application is submitted for a number of vaiances
compatible with DRC authority and in order to optimize the land use while specific consideration is given to the
surrounding community, appea-aoce, land use, traffic impact and other issues of concern.
In accordance with the City land use map, the above property is designated as Office District .0. and the land use
criteria for this zoning is as follows:
Future Land Use Designation:
Land Area:
Impervious Surf~ Ratio (ISR):
Set Backs:
Parking:
Height Limit
ResidentiaVOffice Limited
29.060 SF
.75 = 21.795 SF
25.00 feet front and 20 feet sides
3 spaces per 1,000 SF of Growth Floor Ivea (GFA)
30 feet
This particular property is surrounded by three streets; Bay Lane to the south, McMullen Booth Road to the west, and
Drew Street to the north. The size of the pr~erty, 220 LF long and 132 LF wide, imposes additional burden on the
proper use of the land to the detriment of the project. Therefore, a few variances are requested herewith in cxder to
optimize the use of the land without any adverse impcd on the surrounding community or roads.
The owner of the property requests three V~arK;eS to the future zoning requirements of the city. These variarY'J.:S are
within the guidelines of the ex~tons to the ROL zoning requirements of the City of Clearwater and they are as
follows:
a. Variance for frontage set ba:;k from 25 feet to 10 feet on Drew and Bay lane streets. This variaoce is
sought in order to design a user fri€ndly pcrting aea In return, additional landscaping as a buffer wiD
be provided to enhance t1e visua a;>pearance of the project
b. Variance for side setbEd abng the east property line from 20 feet to 10 feet In retum, additiona
landscaping and a 6 f~ high wood fence ytill be provided as a visual baner between the perking area
and adjacent property.
c. Variance for the height restriction from 30 feet to 39.5 feet is requested. The building design is
intended to be three sties at a height of 13 feet floor to floor, therefore while there is no limitation on
the number of floors in zooing the vaian:e for height will be required. The third story is required in
order to optimize the ~ a-ea as alIoHed by zoning. In return, we will maintain 25 feet set back for
the building within the tl'ree surrounding streets.
d. Variance for reduction of parking from 34 spaces to 32 spaces
...
e
e
EXHIBIT C
RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE IN FILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
CRITERIA
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and
development standards.
The applicant is requesting an IIlcrease in height from 30 to 39.5 feet and a
redlll:tion or the fi'ont and side setbacks. The increase in height from 30 to 39.5
feet remains consistent with the three story standard requirement but provides a
height of 13 feet from Iloor to floor providing a more functional and higher end
interior appearance compatible with market driven demands.
The reduction of front setbacks along Drew Street and Bay Lane is for pavement
only. The building is setback 25 feet from all three public right of ways. The
reduction of the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet is also for pavement only.
The decrease in pavement setback allows the preservation of several trees on-site
while providing for a functional parking lot.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
in fill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting
properties.
Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will
be enhanced by the development of this office project. The adjacent offices are
older existing houses converted to an office use. The construction of a new office
building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting
properties, as well as increase the fair market value.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are
othenvise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Thc proposed rcquest IlH. onice is consistent with both the existing zoning and
futurc land usc of the subject property and adjoining otliee parcels. The proposed
reductions are permissible via the City's Flexible Development standards.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment
project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The proposed office use of the property is consistent with adjacent office uses
south of the project and provides a buffcr bctween a major artcrial roadway and
the adjacent residential properties to the east. The use is also consistent with the
County Future Land Use designation
e
.
5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses
within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise
available in the City of Clearwater.
The parcel currently contains two abandoned houses zoned "Office". There are
no other parcels in the immediate desired area available that are compatible with
this zoning and Future Land Use designation.
(). Thc dc~'cloplllcn' of thc pun:c1luoOPoscd fOlo dc\'cloplllcnt us u eOllllu'chcnsive
infilll'cdcvcloluncnt PI"oj(.'ct willupgnulc thc illllllcdiutc vicinity of the pureel
proposcd for dcvelopmcnt.
Thc proposcd oflicc dcvelopmcnt will rcplacc lwo abandoncd houses and greatly
upgradc thc immcdiate vicinily.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project
creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed investment made in the property by removal of abandoned
buildings and replacing with new office construction will benefit the immediate
area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent office property,
stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable office
space to increase the tax base of the City.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The flexibility in regard to lot wide and required setbacks is due to the location of
three front setbacks around the property and the desire to retain several existing
trees on thc properly. In addition. the 15 feel from the McMullen Booth Right of
Way will include a significant amount of additional landscape material without
storm water retention, signage or other structures. This will significantly increase
the appearance of the road frontage. The parking lot configuration will also
eliminate access and traffic impacts on Bay Lane which is more residential in
nature. Foundation plants are provided on three sides of the building as well as a
6 foot high privacy fence along the east property line abutting the residential use.
The increase in building height from 30 feet to 39.5 feet will set an upgraded
office design standard of higher ceilings, while maintaining a three story
maximum consistent with standard requirements.
e
.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-
street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required
parking per standard code will be provided on-site.
.
.
I
'0'.'.' I ',.l\o. 1.
' - , , " & ,
<. < , .
" I'" j,..- ,.' -"_
FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Date Received: 11/20/2003
DABIRI OFFICE BUILDING
ZONING DISTRICT: 0
LAND USE: RJOL
ATLAS PAGE: 292A
C L WCoverSheet
e
e
Keith Zayac & Associates" Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
0: r: (' ~ :\'E D
101 Philippe Pkwy, Ste 205
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keithzayac@aol.com
December 26, 2003
Mr. Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
Municipal Services Building
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: DABIRI OFFICE BUILDING #FLD2003-11061
Utl .( h !UU,i
Pl./\~, '; ,
".-.... ,e
i
::NT
..,--- 1:'3
. ..:..',
OR/G/NIU
C~., \,4' (..r ~ r^/,'~
-'_..._if ,;'\. 111.
Dear Mr. Reynolds,
Enclosed please find twelve sets of revised civil construction plans addressing comments
received from your office including the following items:
COMPLETENESS COMMENTS
1. The proposed office building gross floor area has been reduced from an FAR of 0.45
to an FAR of 0.40, which is within the City and County code requirements. This
change is reflected in the site plan notes and within the building footprint on the site
plan.
2. Enclosed are twelve copies of the revised application request. Based on the revised
building area, the requests for deviations from City code have been reduced to an
increase in building height and a reduction in setbacks to the proposed parking lot.
3. The enclosed plans have been revised to be in conformance with the Pinellas
Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridor Master Plan including additional
landscape buffer plantings and removal of the proposed retention pond within the
building setback along McMullen Booth Road, and relocation along the south
property line.
4. Based on a telephone conversation between Bennett Elbo and Brian Johnson, with
OKS, a traffic study will not be required.
5. The applicability criteria on the application has been revised in conformance with
comment #2 and further detailed based on City code section 2-1004 flexibility criteria
requirements.
6. Exhibit A has been revised in conformance with comments #2 and #5 to include
setback reductions and building height.
7. The Description of Request section of the application form has been revised in
conformance with comments #2, #5 and #6 to include the deviations requested.
1:\Dabiri Office Bldg\Documents\MikeReynolds[CityOfClearwater]RepIyT oComments_122603.doc
e
e
8. Exhibit A has been revised to include a narrative addressing the flexibility criteria for
the waivers required.
9. Twelve copies of the SWFWMD permit application are included in this resubmitted.
10. The site data table has been revised to include the required and proposed
dimensional requirements.
11. The enclosed surveys are signed and sealed.
12. The parking provided, based on the reduced building area, now conforms to City
code and the parking study is no longer applicable.
SUFFICIENCY COMMENTS
1. The proposed curb cuts have been reduced from two full curb cuts to one full curb cut
and a right out only at the eastern most location. Enclosed are twelve copies of the
Memorandum titled Dabiri Driveway Summary addressing the curb cut reduction
criteria.
2. The term "net" building area has been deleted from the plans. The building gross
area conforms to the definition included in the City code.
3. Enclosed are twelve sets of revised building elevations showing height dimensions.
4. Enclosed is one reduced landscape plan in color.
5. There are no known watercourses, wetlands or tree masses on the subject property.
The one 30" pine specimen tree identified by the City has been retained with the
addition of a planting island in the parking lot. The property groundcover includes a
mixture of grasses, bamboo and bare dirt within the existing abandoned residential
lots. There are no known wildlife habitats on the property.
6. The utility plan has been revised to include the closest fire hydrant location.
7. Based on the project survey, there are no known easements on the subject property.
We have requested the surveyor to research and advise if different.
8. Based on comment #7, there are no known easements on the property.
9. There are no proposed signs associated with this project. As shown on the
elevations, the property address will be on the face of the building along McMullen
Booth Road.
1:\Dabiri Office Bldg\DocumentslMikeReynolds[CityOfClearwater]RepIyToComments_122603.doc
e
e
OTHER COMMENTS
1. The FAR has been revised in conformance with City and County code.
2. The building color scheme has been revised per City meetings.
3. The parking provided with the revised floor area now meets City code.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMENTS
1. Based on meetings with City staff, the eastern most driveway has been revised from
a full access to a right out only, and a narrative describing the proposed change
included in this submittal.
2. There is no proposed work within the County or State roadways associated with this
project.
3. The site triangles have been revised to 20' x 20' measured from the right of way line
and shown on the site and landscape plans.
ENGINEERING REVIEW COMMENTS
1. A sidewalk has been added along Bay Avenue within the available right of way.
2. The proposed sidewalk has been removed from the proposed driveways
3. There is no work associated with this project within FOOT right of way.
4. The project will utilize an existing water service with a single connection point,
therefore a Health Department permit is not required.
5. The dumpster will meet City enclosure requirements.
6. The dumpster has been relocated and planting island radii increased to provide better
access to the location, and out of the parking lot.
7. A RPBP has been added to the water service.
LAND RESOURCE REVIEW
1. The proposed parking lot layout has been revised to include a large planting island at
the location of the 30" pine tree.
1:\Dabiri Office Bldg\Documents\MikeReynolds[CityOfClearwater]RepIyT oComments_122603.doc
e
e
2. The proposed parking lot, retention pond, and eastern access have been revised to
address the retention of trees. The landscape plan provides an inch for inch
replacement of trees rated 3-5 being removed.
3. The enclosed tree survey has been revised to include all trees 4" DBH and greater.
STORMWATER REVIEW
1. The vertical walls along the Rights of Way have been removed.
2. The stormwater calculations have been revised to include 50% credit for existing
impervious area.
We trust the enclosed items in conjunction with the above-responses satisfy the City's
request for additional information. Please contact us if there are any questions.
Sincerely,
~~~
Alex Azan, P.E.
Sr. Project Manager
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
1:\Dabiri Office Bldg\Documents\MikeReynolds[CilyOfClearwater]RepIyT oComments_122603.doc
e
e
~ Clearwater
~~
u~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle A~~ \ f1 t 1\ L
Clearwater, Florid 3 7 6 \ G t\1 L}
Telephone: 727-5 I "n
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDINa.LJ~ OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES~:;'" ']> .' r.... .. }'f'",: i.'.:.'., \.'. .'.. r-.... -- D
NORTH:. ....... .... . ",' '"
SOUTH:N
WEST:
EAST:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
/)(-1
(: h /I/UJ
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED Pi,
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) .
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
(Revised 11/05/02)
.'~ ,--:.~fc'\~
'\ j.lVT~NT
".'.r:;-.R
~" ..... ,,:;,
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: MR. :s: ,N\~s. /Vl~O()D DABt~1
MAILING ADDRESS: 3D2.<..( H~V~f"D~D l>~{v€"_ CC.t::.-"~"Le:re, FL 3576/
PHONE NUMBER: ( 72. 7) 726 8 ( 8 7
FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
M '" 55w D DI\ ~t e I ~
(Must include ALL owners)
/VlALovsc D^"~I~'
AGENT NAME: Kc: I cH
2/\ '(AC ~
A :SS'c.>C t A or ~S (,N. (. .
.;
CELL NUMBER:
PA(2.~\NA,<, 5url"€ 2.0S"'- 5/'t.FeTt f-lAlc.(~o~.; fL 34(,";
FAX NUMBER: ({ Z 7 ) it7J3 <? 855
E-MAIL ADDRESS: K" t;;11H ~A'(A.C @ I\OL. (olY\
MAILING ADDRESS: 10 ( PHI <"l P fiE.
PHONENUMBER(iZl) 1~3 ,?seg
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS: III M(Mu/AJ::lJ goD-rH (<D. c:.<-(;j1'\~WA'-C:c;-n.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ t::C. P<..AN$
PARCEL NUMBER: (b(2.~( 16( (OJ'Jl6( (JOO/ DOlO
PARCEL SIZE: O.f,6 e:...cs +/- Z~..... 085 sf.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): ll_ 6.34. d bf{l'ce j>....; Ld.\'~.
(number of dwelling Units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): II e,rc(tJ.U.C.( ~+ ~~fh,.d.<: 0/01'1." Dr-ew: S~+ ~ ~C4.j UA.h.e
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
~rvl"'1 2.5' h> \0' ~ f4kl'l'\.~ 2.) r2Rclc.catl siU ~h"",k 'l(on~ ,.e.)"icltrt~l {YOWl 20' tt> (D'
3) (n{~Sl. bvildi~ "-Cf~k4 .f.,..c1IorI 30' tt> 3~- f; .
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
e
e
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
Il3 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
-:p ~YliJ (lsl
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
[J Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
-tc> f!{ 0 L r.bll\.:~ A. s lo...,)
La..,) -tL...t l~O c>. I 5' 1..,
2.
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. -rf( .
(re f'l"Dp osc.ef
It ~ ~ ,. ..;) r\ €?f;J"'- f,'l( (' tot rUt{
",k o-tl.er erDp~"+':~)
tkvelof~ 15 ~...r~ ~'1 {~r<< .9f...-u.h a~
;.:. ;b ~~rroc.(,...J.i", s, it> 1~ Crn+.-......'l it t'k~t\'e.s ~
~~~
yo.(u( ..{'
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.~( '/ .
f'f IS a. ye ~ 'If''e
~4 "> tlc> c..1v,<,,~ otft"C,E' <\'t> "*/M Ot'" -t~ r~5id.t'vtc.(: ~ -f~
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ____/ .
{lI'f? f~Ds.<.J
tu..... 35 'P~i,,' S"~ OI.~ i+ Cs sel"\(.e~ b~ M, Millie"!.
{k."'C~ f\lO -tY'~t (.~~ts a~ e)(p~.
de~dof~ "~s. CA.fO'cl'4."1
~~ ~. ~ D..~"" g..-est;.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
TL-t ((r-"7o~t! dR'lelort7\4...&- \5> Aii' o-\f<'(.e 0<.1\ Lc!\V\1 o+- b~ ~I~ ('n hM'lftU~ wl1-k
r..foL Lq~ lJ~ ~~ a.v-J *~f-'t"e ~;e:.f-t'",* Wlf" -tt..<<. ~lArro,.u"~U"" Co.., ~''''V'll~
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties. ~(
(~ f~o~d o{fi<e.. bu,W~'''''~ does hO-\- ~(~cJa.\t'1 0"(" otkt~l'i<
c..+fE"C~ +~ S",,~..A"~s. Tk ~...Jeo..-el e,'.oO ^"'" ~ S": OD (0/\,\ w'oyb~ h.o...r~
a r'C: ~~"',",coVlIQv.s WI"tit..~ -floe Ca~In\l..J~i~.
[J Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate
sheets as necessary) - Explain how criteria is achieved, in detail:
Pl.e""1\% 5C6 kTTA<::.tteD
ru. J..lA.al F VWlt ~+ bc.ck 1-
(9(ttl~l-r "A" .__ ~d.t.tcd S~ Sef~~ ~ 20' ~ lO:;
2c)' ~ lD' ~ l"",-cr~e;.srcJ Q<Jaot/'"'"" I-e(..,~~ ~ :t>d +0 30;.5'
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
e
e
E.
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
g"
t;/
~
~
0/'
o
o
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be
in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to
the parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F.
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
/' All dimensions;
v North arrow;
~ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
~ Location map;
../ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
----;?"'"
--::T'
----;::;-
.,/
./'
L
r
1
/'
.../
/"
/"
~
tiLa/
ro SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
'-..L"" Land area in square feet and acres;
---L:'"
--L
~
~
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A. R.) for all nonresidential uses.
~
~
----L
--..L
-L
-L
. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y:. X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
G.
~
~
v'
2:
/'
-;/
~
~
I:]
H.
~
~
-----:7
2-
~
~
----L'
~
~
~
t!fP,.
-L
~
I:]
I:]
I.
~
~
J.
I:]N{A
I:]N{^
I:] H{A
I:] N/A
e
e
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 11, X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 11, X 11) (black and white and color
rendering, if possible) as required.
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
Reduced signage proposal (8 11, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
e
e
K. TRAFFICIMPACTSTUDY:(Section4-801.C) NOl eC;.~lAlfe;o felt- {()~Yb1Z.S...,.'T,o,,1 w(Crrr
eN~IN~(S)
1:1 Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
Sworn to and subscribed
t>~M ~e::;lC A.D.
J., If:.:Y L. A 2:1'W-1
produced
identification.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
before me this Z b day of
20 ~ to me and/or by
, who is personally known has
as
Notary public,
My commission expires:
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
"
e
e
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: R15Ft::e :Pe~ /c.h)S 5<.J~MI('7Al- -toR...
'"'to
APFlDA Ytl "To A () TtiD 'e. \~ II 4 E::.'"""X-r
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
~:\r'lanmng uepartmenllAppflCallon ~orms\(jeveIOpmenl reVlew\2002 ~ormS\1leXlble developmenl applIcatIon LooL.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
"p
f
~:
f(o.~
...,~~LOF TN~~
~~~~LCr~i'~,""
.~.~l,~~;'~
~_\~ - ~
~};~___fliP"~. );C
""+-!'f/"TECl ~, .""
~."'" I fl,,"'.'
'~~f~'"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
March 24, 2004
Mr. Keith Zayak
Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc.
101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-11 061- 117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Dear Mr. Zayak:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 16, 2004, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit an 11,350 square foot office building with a
reduction to the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, a reduction to the front setbacks
(north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side setback from 20
feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive
Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. Based on the application and the
staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application
with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast corner of the site, no grade changes are to occur
within the drip line, an aeration system is to be designed to preserve the tree, crushed
concrete is to be used in the design as the tree will not tolerate lime rock (submit prior to
building permit issuance);
2. That the site plan be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, to enlarge the landscaped
island between the two curb cuts and relocate the loading zone to two spaces immediately
south of where the loading zone is shown on the site plan date revised 2-3-04, ensuring a 24
foot wide minimum drive aisle (submit prior to building permit issuance);
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
Hoyr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
,
March 24, 2004
Zayak - Page Two
3. That the site plan be revised to a) correctly state the parking required and provided parking,
and b) address the Fire Department concern for a 28 foot turning radius ingress/egress for
emergency vehicles (submit prior to building permit issuance;
4. That a Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to C.o. by the applicant;
5. That an approved right-of-way permit be obtained from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a
City of Clearwater Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension;
6. That an approved health permit be obtained from Pinellas County Health for sanitary
connection prior to issuance of a building permit;
7. That a reduced pressure back flow preventor device be required if the proposed use requires
one to be installed;
8. That a redevelopment credit of 50% be applied to existing conditions hydrology with 1 hour
Time of Concentration (before building permit issuance);
9. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance;
10. That documentation of abandonment of septic system(s) be provided prior to Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That an irrigation plan sheet be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
12. That the landscape plan sheet be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to building
permit issuance;
13. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
14. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located
underground;
15. That all signage meet Code, consist of channel letters for any wall signs, and be
architecturally integrated to the design of the building and site; and
16. That the applicant is to work with City of Clearwater staff toward revising the dumpster
location on the site plan.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (by March 16, 2005). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
March 24, 2004
Zayak - Page Three
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice
of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The
appeal period for your case expires on March 30, 2004.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior
Planner, at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City
through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D BlFLEXIJ>ending cases\Up for the next CDB\McMullen Booth N 117 Dabiri Office Building (0) _
ApprovedlMcMullen Booth N. 117 Development Order March 24, 2004.doc
':::B I[i I r j[, F EF DF'T
Jun. 17 2004 03:59PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO.
Cit~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE
01 98138853107
START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
Jun. 17 03:58PM 01'24 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' MENU' ~4.
THEN SB...ECT OFF BY US II'.fi ' +' OR ' -' .
FIR FAX ADVANTAGE ASS I STAI'K:E, PLEASE CFLL 1-8OO-I-ELP-FAX (435- 7329) .
e
.
Exhibit "A"
New Office Building, 117 North McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, ROOda
Parcel No. 16129/16/199261000/0010
Rexible Development Application
Zoning and Land Use ORe variance request
The above mentioned site's geographic location and size in relation to the future zoning ordinance causes undo
restriction on the development of the site. Therefore, the application is submitted for a number of vcriances
compatible with DRC authority and in order to optimize the land use while specific consideration is given to the
surrounding community, appeerance, land use, traffic impact and other issues of concern.
In accordance with the City land use map, the above property is designated as Office District .0. and the land use
criteria for this zoning is as follows:
Future Land Use Designation:
Land Area:
Impervious Sum Ratio OSR):
Set Backs:
Parking:
Height Limit
ResidentiaVOffice Limited
29,060 SF
.75 = 21,795 SF
25.00 feet front and 20 feet sides
3 spaces per 1,000 SF of Growth Roor Area (GFA)
30 feet
This particular property is sllTOUnded by three streets; Bay Lane to the south, McMullen Booth Road to the west and
Drew Street to the north. The size of the property, 220 LF long and 132 LF wide, imposes additional burden on the
proper use of the land to the detiment of the project Therefore, a few variances ere requested herewith in order to
optimize the use of the land without any adverse impcct on the surrounding community or roads.
The owner of the property requests three variances to the future zoning requirements of the city. These variances ere
within the guidelines of the exceptions to the ROL zoning requirements of the City of Clearwater and they ere as
follows:
a. Variance for frontage set bed< from 25 feet to 10 feet on Drew and Bay lane streets. This variance is
sought in order to design a user fiiendly perking erea. In return, additional landscaping as a buffer will
be provided to enhCflCe the visua cweaance of the project.
b. Variance for side setbed< along the east property line from 20 feet to 10 feet In return, additional
landscaping and a 6 feet high wood fence will be provided as a visual bcrrier between the pcmng area
and adjcr;ent property.
c. Variance for the height restriction from 30 feet to 39.5 feet is requested. The building design is
intended to be three s1l:res at a height of 13 feet floor to floor, therefore while there is no limitation on
the number of floors in zoning the variarce for height will be required. The third story is required in
order to optimize the buiding erea as allowed by zoning. In retum, we will maintain 25 feet set bcd< for
the building within the three surrounding streets.
The most significant feature of 1tis design is the conscious effort to optimize the pervious landscaped spcr;e on site.
The proposed site plan and desigl. utilizes only 17,970 square feet or 62"10 of the land as impervious while the land
use allows 21,806 square feet ex 75%. ThErefore, the requested vaiances are used to optimize the site utilization and
minimize any impcct to the sUITOU'ldings.
~.
e
.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
PERMIT ApPUCATION
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
2379 BROAD STREET . BROOKSVILlE, FL 34604-6899
(352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (BOO) 423-1476
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
ACOE Application #
Date Received
Proposed Project Latitude _0_'_"
Proposed Project Longitude 0 '
DEPIWMD Application #
Date Received
Fee Received $
Fee Receipt #
SECTION A
PART 1:
Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters?
Dyes fl! no
Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction? 0 yes PI no
PART 2:
A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one)
D Noticed General- include information requested in Section B.
D Standard General (single family dweUing)-include information requested in Sections C and D.
D Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
[Ar Standard General (minor systems) - include information requested in Sections C and H.
D Standard General (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I.
D Individual (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D.
D Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
D Individual (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I.
D Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E.
D Mitigation Bank (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F.
(Ifthe proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another permit
listed above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.)
D Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Section C and F.
B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one)
~ Construction or operation of a new system. including dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and other surface waters.
(If reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn permit! application, please provide previous permit
# .)
D Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP.
D Modification of a system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit #
and check applicable modification type.
D Alteration of a system 0 Extension of permit duration D Abandonment of a system
D Construction of additional phases of a system D Removal of a system
C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. 0 yes IIl"'no
If yes, include the information requested in Section G.
D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested:
D Individual D Programmatic General D General D Nationwide ct"Not Applicable
E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? Dyes liVho
If yes, provide rule number if known
FORM 547.27/ERP(B-94)A
Page 1 of 5
Click here to reset "For Agency Use Only."
e
.
PART 3:
A. OWNER(S) OF LA."D B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER)
NAME NAME
Massoud Dabiri
COMPANY AND TITLE COMP ANY AND TITLE
ADDRESS ADDRESS
3024 Haverford Drive
CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP
Clearwater, Florida 33761
TELEPHONE (727 ) 726 8787 TELEPHONE ( )
FAX (727 ) 725 9545 FAX ( )
C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECt:RE PERMIT (IF D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM
AN AGENT IS VSED) AGENT)
NAME NAME
Alex L. Azan, P.E.
COMPANY AND TITLE COMP ANY AND TITLE
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
ADDRESS ADDRESS
101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 205
CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
TELEPHONE ( ) TELEPHONE (727 ) 793 9888
FAX ( ) FAX (727 ) 793 9855
PART 4: PROJECT L'\fOR....1A TIO~
A. Name of project, includi.'Jg phase if applicable: The Dabiri Office Building
B. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? o 0 yes vono
C. Total applicant-owned a"ea contiguous to the project 0.67 acres
D. Total project area for which a permit is soughtO.67 acres
E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought 0 41 acres
F. Total area (metric equivaient for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands or other surface
waters: 0.00 acres or 0.00 square feet (0.00 hectares orO.OO square meters)
G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: 0
FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A
Page 2 of5
e
.
PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed)
County(ies) Pinellas
Section(s) 16 Township
Section(s) Township
Land Grant name, if applicable
Tax Parcel Identification Number
Street address, road, or other location 117 North McMullen Booth Road
City, Zip Code, if applicable Clearwater, Florida 33759
29 South
Range
Range
16 East
PART 6: DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR
ACTIVITY.
Construction of a storm water management system to serve the 0.67 ac parcel. Outfall for project
will be into existing swale located on south side of Drew Street
FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A
Page 3 of 5
. . .
PART 7:
A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory
staff, please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives.
Date(s) Location(s) Names
Dee 2003 City of Clearwater
B. Please identify by number any MSSW/WRM (dredge & fill)/ERP/ACOE permits or
applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the
proposed project site.
Agency Date Number/ Type Action Taken
c. Note: The followinq information is required for proiects proposed to occur in, on or over
wetlands that need a federal dredqe and fill permit and/or authorization to use state owned
submerqed lands. Please provide the names, addresses and Zi) codes of prope~ owners
whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding applicant and/or is locate within a
500 foot radius of the project boundary (for proprietary authorizations. if ad?" Please provide
a drawing identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use a ditional sheets, if
needed).
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 4 of 5
.
e
PART 8:
A. By si~ing this appli~tj~ form, I am appl);n~ or J am applying on bebalfoftbe own~ ~r appli7anl, for.the permit.andl~r
proP!1e~ authonzan~ Identified above, aCC<lnling to the sup~rting ~a~ and other incidental mform~bon filec;1 WJ~ thIS
apphcatlon. I am farrulJ31 with the informati(ln contained in thIS apphcabon, and rcpresentthat such mformalJon IS true
eomplelcand accurate. I understand that kno"';n~ly making any falscstatement orrcpresentation in the application is a violation
of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.c. Section 1001. I understand this is an application and not a permit and work prior to
approval is a violation. I understand that this application and any permit or proprietary authorization iss1!ed.pursuant thereto,
docs not relIeve me of any obligation for obtainin~ ltny other required federal, state, water management dlstnct or local pemut
prior.to commencement of Construction. I agree. or I agree on behalf of the ~wner or appli78nl, to op~rate ~d maintain the
pemutted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permllto a responSible operabon enbty.
Ma.sso~d Dabiri (
Typ~ Name. off"ner, Applicant-il( A~
~,-~bf.---. _~
Signature of ()y,-ner, Applicant or Agent
Corporate Tille, if applicable
12-23-03
Dale
B. AN AGENT \IA Y SIGN ABOVE O:\L Y IF THE FOLLOWING IS COMPLETED:
I hereby designate anc 2l.woriz.c the a2CDt list~ 10 act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the
processing of this a;J?lication for tbe- permit anJur proprietary authorization indicated abovc; and 10 furnish, on requcst,
supplemental infcr.mz:ion in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed agent 10 bind me, or my
corporation, to J>erl"or:n any requirement v.hieh =y bc necessary 10 procure the permit or authorizalion indicaled above.
Typed/Printed ~ame ci cr"ner or Applicant
Corporate Title, if applicable
Signature of ()y,ner cr. A;l;)Jicanl
Date
c.
PERSON AlTHORIZI:\G ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWI;';G:
I eilher ow~ the jl~ described in :.~js application or 1 have legal authority to allow acccss to the propcny. and I conscnt,
after r~elv,"g p:lO: l>:T":ication, to tty site \'isll on lhc propcrty by agents or personnel from the Departmenl ofEn\'ironmental
PrOl~ClJOn. the 50':-"-= Florida W= Managcn',nl District and the U.S. Army Corps of Enginecrs necessary for the review
and msp~tlon oft.'Y.;:--J?OSed pro)= s;x:cifl<:d '" this application. I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the propcny
as many tImes as ::-.zy "- "cccssarv 10 ::-.ake such "',,iew and inspeclion. Further, I agree 10 provide entry 10 the project site for
such agents or pe:Y=G 10 moryUr. ~'>oriz.cd ...urk if a permil is granled.
Massoud Dabiri
T~A,
.~~,/
Signature
~.
->
Corporale Title, if applicable
12-23-03
. Dale
I certify that the ~~""";ng fcatu:es of this ",rface wat.er management syslem have been designed by me or under my
responsible c~~ aX ::: my prof~sKr....J opin",n conform ",ith sound engineering principles and all applicable rules and
speCIfications. I f'-.--= ~ L;31 J CT my engmccring firm ",ill furnish Ihe applicant/ permittee with a set of guidelines and
schedules for =-== and o;><=z::x of the \urface water management system.
t.' ..'~ l~' ~ ~,~,_~:.!."-,. .
~./'<~;1~"~~Cf:>:<'~J,. . .-
;r.' .....0........'....'......:.."...,...".'...'...'.. '~IP.....~.!:F 0[. - _ 'f. R=
/ qi(;\:;:i'..O .~<'"'. .
.:' Q). i"::,'.",K:::~~" Z .,. ~ .~I~"1>fFJ X c ~ A L '
t.E.?!"i~;~.,1;5f.;~::\.~\:F~ -- .
.? :g+~;;f'~'~;J:r~fl~ 2 ~. ioo 3
.. 'k.'~''"'"'' ,.".~ .
" ~.... ':'I!-~'\-(;/'ro...<::,..- .Ol """.A · . . .
:~~~~u;-,ir01t~;.. N','~: :
~,(".j~ .. ,<:,t!~T:~[i"~, n:. '} ., 8~g
~.,.r~Q. ..,.rI~\y,........._..,. ..'. /
,,',,; '~":J>!":f...; ~..,.- :.."
'.~r, /,4;'~'~~( '. ,..
';;!/;.,~y~~ .:;' "':':: ,~...
..~i~'.Sti~.'i(,,\
! ....'~m~~.:.ill,'t'"
FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A
D.
A Le.x L. A i.A"I., P. E.
FL
3Li"~5
Page 5 of5
--
--
<J'
fill
(II
f
~
G.
I:eI
.L
..L
L
-2
L
1:1
1:1
H.
->
7
~
L
*
z
-L
.L
MiA
2::
~
~
1:1
I.
~
;a-
J.
MfA-
N/,k
~Jt
It"
-
e
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal stonn systems;
Proposed stonnwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stonnwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHVVEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Penn it), if applicable
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWA TER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and propOSed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of aU required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including drip line;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling. mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y,X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
eUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color
rendering, if possible) as required.
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
Reduced signage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
e
.
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
101 Philippe Pkwy., Ste 205
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keithzayac@aol.com
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Michael Reynolds
FROM:
Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA
DATE:
December 23, 2003
RE:
Dabiri Driveway Summary
The original project included two full access driveway locations accessing the proposed
parking lot from Drew Street The driveways are separated by approximately 60 feet from
center lines. The revised layout includes one full access driveway closest to the proposed
office building and a right out driveway replacing the eastern most full access driveway in
response to City comments. The additional right out driveway is included based on the
following project constraints:
· The driveways are designed to access the project from Drew Street rather than Bay
Avenue. Bay Avenue is primarily a substandard residential access street, while Drew
Street is a collector road conducive to office use access. The driveways are designed
to access Drew Street since access to McMullen Booth Road and Bay Avenue is not
practical. These constraints limit the available access points to the project.
· The driveway circulation will allow a garbage truck to enter the site at the western full
access driveway and exit at the western right out only access. A one driveway design
will not provide adequate access and circulation for trash collection.
· The revised circulation pattern will avoid a dead-end driveway design. This will
eliminate unsafe backup conditions ifthere are no parking spaces available. With the
proposed design, the cars can exit to the east if no parking is available.
· The right out driveway has been reduced in width from 24 ft to 20 ft with a right out
radius at the connection point to Drew Street The reduced driveway width will save
an additional tree and force traffic away from the other proposed driveway and
McMullen Booth Road.
· The right out design will minimize conflicts between the two driveway movements.
The driveway separation does not meet the 125 ft criteria, but does eliminate
connection movement conflicts as addressed by the code.
CL WCoverSheet
.
.
FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Date Received: 11/20/2003
DABIRI OFFICE BUILDING
ZONING DISTRICT: 0
LAND USE: R/OL
ATLAS PAGE: 292A
P. ',.'; A' ".,. ~.e~.' ...~,.," ,
" ..~ ~,".:'~ ,r#
~.-., --..."'! ,;f'>l.rt-., ---.-' ~...... ,~~'-: '>-~l~
'_ d ~~.':'$.
CK. NO. \ll.o O(
OArE.] Il0201Q4 ~iZ..
1
!
-'-. ...
Receipt #: 1200300000000012196
Date: 11/20/2003
11120/2003
12:32:27PM
Line Items:
Case No
Tran Code
Description
Revenue Account No
Amount Paid
FLD2003-11061
04
Flexible Commercial
010-341262
Line Item Total:
1,205.00
$1,205.00
Payments:
Method
Payer
Bank No
Account No
Confirm No
How Received
Payment Total:
Amount Paid
1,205_
$1,205.00
Check
PILOT CONSTRUCTION TECH
slw
11601
In Person
'e
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
cReceipt.rpt
Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
e
~ Clearwater
-~
';~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #: ;:J.L 1'1-..20tE>-f-1!tM, I
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
~ =E~;;~OA~JACENT
NORTH:
SOUTH'.
j,' WEST:-
EAST:
)L SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
~
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
11-. SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) (XI Y C;:::
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
F'~-./\ ~'(-~.:' "..-., '~::,';~'~~"':,~,,,~.;'~'~~'.J~:!\,~
-<. ,)
~~ ,
(Revised 11/05/02)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
Mr. & Mrs. Massoud Dabiri
MAILING ADDRESS:
3024 Hanerford Dr., Clearwater, FL ~3761
PHONE NUMBER:
&@ 727-726-8787
FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTYOWNER(S): Massoud Dabiri & Malouse Dabiri
(Must in dude ALL owners)
AGENT NAME: Keith Zayac & Assoc., Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS:
101 Phi~ippe Pkwy., Ste 205, Safety Harbor, FL 34695
PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888
FAX NUMBER: 727- 7 9 3- 985 5
CELL NUMBER:
E-MAILADDRESS:keithzayac@aol.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS:
117 McMullen Booth Rd. Clearwater, FL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 1 and 2, Crystal Heiqhts Subdivision
PARCEL NUMBER:
16-29-16-19926-000-0010
PARCEL SIZE: 2 9 , 08 5 S. F .
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSEDUSE(S)ANDSIZE(S): 14,820 S.F. office building (13,132 S.P. net)
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): 1. Pront setback reduction from 25 ft to 15 ft along
(indude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Drew St. for pavement. 2. Side setback reduction from 20 ft to
10 ft with a 6 ft high fence. 3. Parking rafio reduction from
3/1000 S.P. to 2.74/1000 4 In ,..., FAR from 4 to 45
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
I
I
I
I
e
e
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGI-fTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C.
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
l'L
SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDA VIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D.
~
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
The Proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
Th office site desi ned in accordance with R OL futur~ land
use desi nation and below the allowable ISO of .75 (.62 ISO)
2.
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
The proposed development is surrounded on three sides
b ublic ri ht of wa and buffered from the adjacent
property by landscapinq and a 6 ft wooden fence
3.
The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the Proposed
use. The office building has a low proposed occupancy without the
use of medical or hazardous waste.
4.
The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5.
The lot is sized adequately for the proposed
use and is accessed by a dual driveway system without dead ends.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The site is developed in accordance with the future land use
and zoning along two major roadways
6.
The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
The hours of operation are proposed from 8:00 am to 5:00pm
The ro osed uses will not roduce an loud noice or visual
exterior uses.
.. Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate
sheets as necessary) - Explain how criteria is achieved, in detail:
Spp i'ltti'll'hmpnt A
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application _ City of Clearwater
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
e
E.
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
....
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
&.
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
~
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be
in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to
the parking standards are approved;
l2f-
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
CJ
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
CJ
COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
.... SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
-L All dimensions;
-L North arrow;
L Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
L Location map;
-L Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
L Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
..L Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
-L.. All required setbacks;
--L All existing and proposed points of access;
7 All required sight triangles;
./??J' Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
c::2:cp.. trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
?L Location of all public and private easements;
-- Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
L Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
~ I
i
-L
.L
~
F.
l2:t SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form:
~ Land area in square feet and acres;
L Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
L Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
L Gross floor area devoted to each use;.
-L Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
L Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
~ Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Z Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
~ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) and color rendering if possible;
CJ FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisr, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
I
e
e
I
STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
I
re
.L
-L
L
-:z
L
I
I
G.
STORMWATER PLAN induding the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading induding finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area induding top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
a
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
a
COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
I
H.
~
7
~
~
.L
L
MLA
1:
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
I.
I
)J-.
I
I
J.
~~
iJz
I'r
I
I
I
I
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas induding swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of aU required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas induding landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, induding dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, induding botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants induding instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings induding height dimensions, colors and materials;
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 'h X 11) (black and white and color
rendering, if possible) as required.
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details induding location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
Reduced signage proposal (8 'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
I
e
e
I
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
I
'1 Include as required If proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the InsliMe of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
l. SIGNATURE:
I
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
describ in t is application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS -/,1
om to and subscribed beforE1...J'le this ~ day of
, A.D. 20(22 to me and/or by
who~_E..~rsona"y known has
as
I
Irglnia Allen
, 265882
~ /" r/ Expires November 30, 2007
~ "" Bonded Troy Fein .,_, Inc. 8QO.385.7019
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{'
I
e
e
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
DAf:,\ Je,.,.f/ M~SDUD
DA- ~ \ r2- \ MA LoUS1Z.
(Names of all property owners1
1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
! 1'1 t\J~1 H N\~LU.N &1JD\fft I!..bltfJ ,
CL/'E-AP-\rJAT~1 FLf}fZ-,fDt>r
2.
That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
I
5E.T libAC \L I
ttF-"lb~T ~
PAJ2.t::.l~')(-=1 VA~i:A1Ce. A-U- 1!e.f)(),~Te.J)
3.
That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (doesIdo) appoint: M~.)C:..l 'E...TH ZAYAC, p. ~,
IC-f7ArrH ZA-YM_ ~D ~)CfA.\~S) I~G.
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6.
COUNTY OF PINElLAS
Property
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned the laws of the State of Florida, on this tJCyJ _ l q , Joo 3 day of
I Cj +i.-.. ,0100 3 personally appeared e.x., kG( Dn ir-c~ I; c. en -e who having been first duly sworn
_.... ""'.... ....... ful~ _....... _ of.......... "'" ""'he ........ , ~ .
9 ~PUbIiC
My Commission Expires:
~J\. Jennifer H Goggin
. ~ j My Commission DOo5Om
\;.~ Expire5A 5t 192
'f)f'fIen leV! s
. c
pa
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
e
Exhibit "A"
New Office Building, 117 North McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, Rorida
Parcel No. 16J29I16J199261000/0010
Rexible Development Application
Zoning and Land Use ORe variance request
The above mentioned site's geographic location and size in relation to the future zoning ordinance causes undo
restriction on the development of the site. Therefore, the application is submitted for a number of vcriances
compatible with DRC authority and in order to optimize the land use while specific consideration is given to the
surrounding community, appeCl'ance, land use, traffic impact and other issues of concern.
In accordance with the City land use map, the above property is designated as Office District "0" and the land use
criteria for this zoning is as follows:
Future Land Use Designation:
Land Area:
Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR):
Set Backs:
Parking:
Height Limit
Residential/Office Limited
29,060 SF
.75 = 21,795 SF
25.00 feet front and 20 feet sides
3 spaces per 1,000 SF of Growth Floor Area (GFA)
30 feet
This particular property is surrounded by three stree1s; Bay Lane to the south, McMullen Booth Road to the west and
Drew Street to the north. The size of the property, 220 LF long and 132 LF wide, imposes additional burden on the
proper use of the land to the detriment of the project. Therefore, a few variances Cl'e requested herewith in order to
optimize the use of the land without any adverse impa:t on the sunounding community or roads.
The owner of the property requests three variances to the future zoning requirements of the city. These variances Cl'e
within the guidelines of the exceptions to the ROL zoning requirements of the City of Cleawater and they Cl'e as
follows:
a. Variance for frontage set bed< from 25 feet to 15 feet on Drew and Bay lane stree1s. This variance is
sought in order to design a user fiiendly perking Cl'ea. In return, additional landscaping as a buffer will
be provided to enhance the visual appearance of the project.
b. Variance for the height restriction from 30 feet to 39.5' feet is requested. The building design is
intended to be three stories at a height of 13 feet, floor to floor, therefore while there is no limitation on
the number of floors in zoning the variance for height will be required. The third story is required in
order to optimize the building Cl'ea as allowed by zoning. In return, we will maintain 25 feet set bed< for
the building within the three sunounding stree1s.
c. Variance for parking requirements from 3 spa:es per 1,000 squCl'e feet to 2.69 spa:es per 1,000
square feet of the growth area of the office building. It is understood that the owner's office will occupy
the ground floor with over 4,562 SF and the company employs only six people and no client traffic.
Therefore, if we exclude the owner occupied space and its parking use from the overall office space
the 31 parking spaces for 9,000 squCl'e feet of leasable office spa:es equal to 3.44 sp~ 1,000
square feet of office space is well above the requirement
The most significant feature of this design is the conscious effort to optimize the Dervious landscaoed soace on site.
The proposed site plan and design utilizes only 17,970 square feet or 62% of the land as impervious while the land
use allows 21,806 square feet or 75%. Therefore, the requested vcriances are used to optimize the site utilization and
minimize any impact to the surroundings.
.... 'SO
:;)?Jo . -.:.
C
I
I
c,' 00'
~,\
:?)G, ~'Q)
I
I
7)
\'5\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
WD-I
5193
'.1, 'J""'.
\.'),.
.
CI...tI. ,.
.. r ...' ~
j:.:',
;- ";""::. ,\1, r'" ;I). :.
~?:G
~'; I} ,) _"/.
This Warranty Deed
~'lInLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
------------------------------------
Made this 23rd day of July A.Di
by Ropert S. Grossman, Single
200
7C181968 07-25-2001 13:46:27 EHZ
51 DED-GROSSMANJDABIRI
.0094'n .
1":01257321 BK:11493 SPG:ll10 EPG:1l10
RECORDING 001 PAGES 1 $6.00
DOC STAMP - DR219 $2,362.50
hereinafter called the grantor, to
Massoud Dabiri and Malouse Dabiri, his
wife
whose post office address :is: 3024 Haverford Drive
Clea~ater, FL 33761
Grantees' Tax Id # ~
TOTAL:
ClfCK AMI. TENDERED:
Ii CHANGE:
BY ~... DEPUTY [URK
$2,368.50
$2,368.50
$.00
)
t.;....~
hereinafter called the grantee: .....
(Whenever used -herein the term .g~antor. and -grantee- include all the parties to this instrument and the
heirs, legal representatives and assign. of individuals. and the successors and assigns of corporations)
Witn~eth, that the grantor. for and in consideration of the 8umof $ 10. 00
and other valuaBfe considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises,
releases., conveys)llld confirms unt€' the grantee, all that certain land situate in Pinellas
, County, Florida, viz: ,
Lots 1 and 2, CRYSTAL HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION, according to the plat
thereof as recorded In Plat Book 28, pa!ie' 1, Public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida. .
.
SUBJECT .TO covenants, restrictions, easements of record'and taxes for
the current year.
;l.:;'$D
o 1-2'S732 IJL Y-2S-200 1 1. 47
fO INELLAS CO 8K 11493 fOG '11 m
I 111m 11111 ~1I1 ~III III~ 1111/ 111111111111111111
Parcel Identification Number: 16-29-16-19926-000-0010
Togetherwith all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;
that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and conv<:y'said land; th~t the grantor hereby fully warrants
the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is
free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2001
In Witness Whereof, 'the said 'grantor has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above.
written.
Signed, sealed 'and d~livered in OUI presence:
)
~ .
~".' ~~
~ '~ert~~
.0
6835 Tierra Linda St. .PortRichey, FL 34668
Wl
NamD 4; AddIUl:
,
--J
.Wl
N;une:
Namo 4. AdciJ'cN:
o
Wl
N;une;
NaIIID & Addreu:
State of
County of
Florida
Pasco
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 23 rd day of
" .1 "' ,"
July
200ay
Robert S. Grossman,' Single
who is personally known to me or who 'has produced
as identification.
Photo ID
I.
/
~ .
0. j \j, j\,j,__
'0 Public
P'" t Na e:
My 155lon Expires:
1.M ~ LkJi.
" --
PREPARED BY:
RECORD .. RETURN TO:
Independence Title Company
5303 Main Street
New Port Richey, FL 34652
....6'40" Janine S HiIlan ~_. :
*~*MyCommisSlon OCB15211
\",,"'.:ExpiresMard1:3o:2003. :
:'1:
File No:N01-7282
, c.
',"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
OKS Associates
e
TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Keith Zayac-Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
Brian Johnson, Sr. Transportation Engineer
November 18, 2003
Office Building @ 117 North McMullen Booth
Road PIA No; 03198000-000
As requested, we have reviewed the plans for the proposed office building at
Drew Street and McMullen Booth Road in Clearwater, Florida and have prepared
this estimate of the parking spaces required to accommodate the development
program. As indicated to us, the development will consist of a 14,820 sf (gross
floor area) office building. The ground floor of the building (4,338 sf) will be
occupied by the property owner (PCTI) and will serve as their corporate
headquarters. A total of six employees will be located in this portion of the
development. The potential tenants in the remaining portion (10,482 sf) will
consist of professional businesses such as attorneys, accountants, corporate
offices, etc.
Current data compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers indicates the
maximum parking demands for typical office buildings (less than 250,000 sf) is
2.9 spaces per 1000 sf (gross floor area) or 0.85 per employee. This data is
anticipated to be published in December of this year in the report "Parking
Generation, 3rd Edition."
Applying these rates to the proposed project (six employees @ 0.85 per space
and 10,482 sf @ 2.9/1000 sf) yields an estimate of 36 total parking spaces for the
proposed project.
""'~.!\'" '11< .' : '! ',~~': OCI nt ~'~0" (:()~'\' ,I
-------------------
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.
Dabiri Office Building 11-20-03
Stormwater Calculations
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
Descriotion Area (ff) ~ C= rCA
pavement 802 0.98 786.0
building 2,554 0.98 2,502.9
pond 0 1.00
open area 25,729 0.20 5,145.8 C exist = 0.29
Total area 29,085
PROPOSED CONDITIONS: '-
Descriotion Area (ff) ~ C=
pavement 13,727 0.98 13,452.5
building 4,338 0.98 4,251.2
pond 2,644 1.00 2,644.0
open area 8,376 0.20 1,675.2 C prop = 0.76
Total area 29,085
HISTORIC PEAK DISCHARGE:
t= 10 mins A= 0.67 acs
i = 8.5 in/hr C= 0.2
Q = CiA = 1.1 cfs
25 YEAR STORM e
D I P S R REQUIRED STORAGE
Rainfall Duration Intensity (in/hr) Peak Run-Off Storm Release (cf)
Min Sec FOOT Zone VI Q = CiA (cfs) DxP(cf) Ox H (cf) S-R
10 600 8.5 4.30 2,578 681 1,897
15 900 7.3 3.69 3,322 1,022 2,300
20 1200 6.5 3.29 3,943 1,362 2,581
30 1800 5.4 2.73 4,914 2,043 2,871
40 2400 4.6 2.33 5,582 2,724 2,857
50 3000 4.0 2.02 6,067 3,405 2,662
60 3600 3.6 1.82 6,552 4,086 2,466
90 5400 2.8 1.42 7,644 6,129 1,515
.....
-------------------
CRITICAL STORAGE VOLUME: 2706 CF
TREATMENT VOLUME REQUIRED:
TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED:
TOTAL VOLUME PROViDeD:
1211.88
4069.22 CF
2643.76 SF * 1.6 FT Deep ( 30.0 to 31.6) = 4,230.02 CF
e
e
-
------
------,---
- --
-
Water Quality Treatment
Pond 1
Project: Dabiri Office
Project No.: 229-03
Basin Area: 0.67 Ac
Runoff (in): 0.5 in
Top of Bank EI.: 31.8 Ft e
Area @ T.O.B.: 0.06 Ac
Bottom of Pond 0.06 Ft
Increment: 2 Ft
Area A vg. Area Volume Ace. Vol. Trt. Vol.
Elevation (Ac) (Ac) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) DLW
30.00 0.06 0.00000
0.06 0.12 0.0279 30.47 e
32.00 0.06 0.12000
Required Treatment Volume:
0.02792 Ac - Ft
Calculated Treatment:
30.46528 Ft
-
I -- e.
I
I
I
I
I "
I
I
I
I
I
I I ~
.-
...,
I \ 0
Q)
\ \ a.
I I \i
...,
0
I !
.t:
I ~
0
c:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e _
II
=-C III." 1-
Ir--l
~UL
~.'i=
I~ II
"
~ii --1_L_
=o:;~r-= -, r
~I
~I "
1.:1-1: .
II
"
.
I
m
.
.
-
-
c
o
~
as
>
Q)
Q)
+-'
UJ
Q)
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
e
b
,
in
'"
+
Co
~
+
b
6
~
+
b
6
..!. I
+
-
I
!=====~
C-- c--Jc--,,- ~.. _c_
'_ l__
~ ll- - . I
H~-= I.l_
;~~._- -I r-
~C=
1'-
II
j-lr:=- ,
--
1
.
I
!
c
o
~
as
>
Q)
-
Q)
.r::.
t
o
c
e e
._-_.~~ = ,r; _
-~.L-_
------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
;;;;; --
'II~ -
.=:;~- ...
.
-
m
~ 111-
c
o
~
as
>
Q)
-
Q)
+-'
en
as
Q)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
__--.JL-
~.~
~__J_
--'r---j;--
I' ,.
II
-
-
.
I
I
e
In - --
I
I
,
-
n-
c
o
+-'
as
>
Q)
-
Q)
.c
+-'
:J
o
en
-I
I
I e -
I
I -0- ~~~~
north
I 56' - CT
I I . .....
,..
sidewalk
I ~ ~
I
""
I
"'
31' O.
I I . -
..-
I
f
....
I equipment parking
20' O. room main entry
I I , -
,.,
J
I elevator
~
/
,..
I J
31' - O.
I ".J / ' ...,
~ ,..
..
;/
I ~I ...
I ' ~
sidewalk ....-
I
I ground floor plan
I
I
I e tit
I
I' -0- u.mIiiI!In?m~~~
north
I 29' ..{)" r 15'..{)"
I 1
'I
I 33' 0-
31'
I
I
I 16' .
20' 0-
elevator
I
I
I 33'
31' 5' X 5' wtndow
I (typ.)
I' .J
up
I 2nd floor plan
I
I,
I
I e .
I
I -0- ~~~~
north
I -1 29'-()" t 15'-()"
I
I
I 31' 0"
33' 0-
I
I
I
20' 0- 16' 0"
I elevator
I
I
31' '-6" X 3'-6" window 33' "
I (typ.)
I .J
Up
I
I 3rd floor plan
I
I
I e e
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I ~
.-
....,
0
Q)
I 0.
~
I Q)
I 0.,
U)
!
I
~
~
I 0
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
1
I
. .1
I
i
. .1
. .
e
II
II
II
--
.,.
.i.
.:.
II
II
II
----_.,-~-_._._----- ---..------.. -~- .
c
o
+:i
a1
>
~
Q)
+oJ
en
Q)
~
I e --
I
I b b b b
~ ,
in I 6
<II tI
I + + + -!..
+
I
I
I --------"-_. ---------
I ,. --.---.--.-. -.-
I
I
I
I !
I
I
I
I c:
. 0
e ~
I as
. . . >
Q)
-
I Q)
I .r:.
-e
I 0
c:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
.
;
I
--
II .
II !.
I
I
i
i
i
II I.
I
i
I
II .
II .
II .
c:
o
+:i
as
>
Q)
-
Q)
+-'
en
as
Q)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
-
I
I
I
. I.
.
c
o
+:i
a1
>
Q)
-
Q)
~
..
:J
o
CIJ
.
;
I
i
i
I
! I
, I
I I
! I
I i I
I I
! c.__._._.._ _.-'
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
31' - O.
20' O.
31' - 0-
tit
e
n ~~~~
equipment
room
56' - 0-
sidewalk
~
elevator
ground floor plan
main entry
sidewalk
~
'\
/
,."
/
"
/
parking
,I
/
/"
-
I
i .,.
/
,
,
,/
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
31
20' 0"
31'
e
e
-o-~~~~
north
1
29'-0"
! ,.q i t7q r
elevator
5' X 5' wlndow
(typ.)
33
16'
33'
2nd floor plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
31'
20'
31'
.
.
-g- ~~~~
~1
29'-0"
i 1"", r 17"' r
elevator
'-6' X 3'-6' window
(typ.)
33
16'
33'
.J
Up
3rd floor plan
"
e
--
.t~L Q-~
....~~. ~ OF TJi(A~
..t:\ 1:lldt'rT~,,~"7^~
~~P;l ~. .....~~. (P'
~;:-,;. \, '" ~ ~
....~........' /. 11 ';l. ~
~C":t' - " " c::r::~
""r::\ ~.~
...~~- ~N
""~~--==- . ,f~"",,,,
~~~'~..-P"~~~\~
....~.;~.~TE~'4:f.1.
'~T.lI>>PC
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
March 24, 2004
Mr. Keith Zayak
Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc.
101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-11 061- 117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Dear Mr. Zayak:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 16, 2004, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit an 11,350 square foot office building with a
reduction to the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, a reduction to the front setbacks
(north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side setback from 20
feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive
Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. Based on the application and the
staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application
with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast comer of the site, no grade changes are to occur
within the drip line, an aeration system is to be designed to preserve the tree, crushed
concrete is to be used in the design as the tree will not tolerate lime rock (submit prior to
building permit issuance);
2. That the site plan be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, to enlarge the landscaped
island between the two curb cuts and relocate the loading zone to two spaces immediately
south of where the loading zone is shown on the site plan date revised 2-3-04, ensuring a 24
foot wide minimum drive aisle (submit prior to building permit issuance);
BRIAN J, AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, CmlMIsslONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"T;r\1 , A f ~HrH nV1\Ar:1\T'r A l\1T\ .A r.T;nn,A ATT\JT; !>.. rTUI1\l H1\,{DI nvr.p"
e
e
"
March 24, 2004
Zayak - Page Two
3. That the site plan be revised to a) correctly state the parking required and provided parking,
and b) address the Fire Department concern for a 28 foot turning radius ingress/egress for
emergency vehicles (submit prior to building permit issuance;
4. That a Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to C.O. by the applicant;
5. That an approved right-of-way permit be obtained from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a
City of Clearwater Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension;
6. That an approved health permit be obtained from Pinellas County Health for sanitary
connection prior to issuance of a building permit;
7. That a reduced pressure back flow preventor device be required if the proposed use requires
one to be installed;
8. That a redevelopment credit of 50% be applied to existing conditions hydrology with 1 hour
Time of Concentration (before building permit issuance);
9. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance;
10. That documentation of abandonment of septic system(s) be provided prior to Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That an irrigation plan sheet be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
12. That the landscape plan sheet be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to building
permit issuance;
13. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
14. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located
underground;
15. That all signage meet Code, consist of channel letters for any wall signs, and be
architecturally integrated to the design of the building and site; and
16. That the applicant is to work with City of Clearwater staff toward revising the dumpster
location on the site plan.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (by March 16, 2005). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
e
e
March 24, 2004
Zayak - Page Three
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice
of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The
appeal period for your case expires on March 30, 2004.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior
Planner, at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City
through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\McMullen Booth N 117 Dabiri Office Building (0) -
ApprovedIMcMullen Booth N. 117 Development Order March 24, 2004.doc
e
e
LL
o
>-
f-
-
U
TO:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNINGDEP ARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE A VE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
jJ~/n 2--~~
7f:J- ;??rJ
FAX:
Phone:
-
DA TE:
/l1(/ce l?ey/tolU Phone: S-c.) - ~.p.:?l
3 - J-~ - () r SUBJECT: ~tJ /1;0 :J- /1 () h /
FROM:
MESSAGE: v&c2 ~ d.a./..do/~~ cJv(.~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
~
(
e
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
March 24, 2004
Mr. Keith Zayak
Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc.
101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-11 061- 117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Dear Mr. Zayak:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On March 16, 2004, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit an 11,350 square foot office building with a
reduction to the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, a reduction to the front setbacks
(north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side setback from 20
feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive
Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. Based on the application and the
staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application
with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast comer of the site, no grade changes are to occur
within the drip line, an aeration system is to be designed to preserve the tree, crushed
concrete is to be used in the design as the tree will not tolerate lime rock (submit prior to
building permit issuance);
2. That the site plan be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, to enlarge the landscaped
island between the two curb cuts and relocate the loading zone to two spaces immediately
south of where the loading zone is shown on the site plan date revised 2-3-04, ensuring a 24
foot wide minimum drive aisle (submit prior to building permit issuance);
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER (i) BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
e
March 24,2004
Zayak - Page Two
3. That the site plan be revised to a) correctly state the parking required and provided parking,
and b) address the Fire Department concern for a 28 foot turning radius ingress/egress for
emergency vehicles (submit prior to building permit issuance;
4. That a Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to e.O. by the applicant;
5. That an approved right-of-way permit be obtained from Pinellas County prior to issuance of a
City of Clearwater Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension;
6. That an approved health permit be obtained from Pinellas County Health for sanitary
connection prior to issuance of a building permit;
7. That a reduced pressure back flow preventor device be required if the proposed use requires
one to be installed;
8. That a redevelopment credit of 50% be applied to existing conditions hydrology with 1 hour
Time of Concentration (before building permit issuance);
9. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance;
10. That documentation of abandonment of septic system(s) be provided prior to Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That an irrigation plan sheet be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
12. That the landscape plan sheet be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to building
permit issuance;
13. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
14. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located
underground;
15. That all signage meet Code, consist of channel letters for any wall signs, and be
architecturally integrated to the design of the building and site; and
16. That the applicant is to work with City of Clearwater staff toward revising the dumpster
location on the site plan.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (by March 16, 2005). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you whenaapplying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
e
e
March 24, 2004
Zayak - Page Three
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice
of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The
appeal period for your case expires on March 30, 2004.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior
Planner, at 727-562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City
through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Department\C D BlFLEXlPending cases\Up for the next CDB\McMullen Booth N 117 Dabiri Office Building (0) -
ApprovedIMcMullen Booth N. 117 Development Order March 24, 2004.doc
(::,Et m I t lei F'EF'DF T
e
-
Mar. 25 2004 11:44AM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO.
Cit~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE
01 97939855
START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT
Mar.25 11:42AM 02'25 SND 04 OK
TO TURN OFF REFUU, PRESS '11EtU' **04.
THBI SELECT OFF BY US I t-U '+' OR '-'.
Fffi FAX ADVANTAGE ASS I STR-CE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-1-EI...P-Ft=lX (435-7329).
-
e
Keith Zayac & Associates" Inc.
Civ' M::;~: 2004 rtecture, Planning
101 Philippe Pkwy, Ste 205
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keithzayac@aol.com
TO:
PLANNING & DE:VELOPMeNT SvCti
Mike R IOS'-EARWATER
City of Clearwater Development Review
100 Myrtle Ave., 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FI 33758
DATE:
JOB #:
RE:
03.01.04
229-03
Dabiri Office
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
[ X] Attached
[ ] Shop Drawings
[ ] Copy of Letter
] Under Separate Cover via
] Prints
] Change Order
] Plans
] Specifications
[ ] Samples
[ X] See Below
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
15 03.01.04 8.5xll Color Landsca e Plan
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED As Checked Below:
[ ] For approval [] Reviewed, no comments
[ ] For your use [] Reviewed, comments as noted
[X] As requested [] Returned for corrections
[ ] For review and comment
] Resubmit _ copies for approval
] Submit _ copies for distribution
] Return _ corrected prints
cc:
SIGNED:
REMARKS:
NAME:
Keithzayac@aol.com
02/12/2004 15:29 7277239277
e
ZAYAC
.'
,.
Keith Za~ac & Auociates. Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning
PAGE 01
tI
101 Philippe Pkwy., Ste 205
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keithzayac@aol.com
FAX TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
February 12, 200~
Mike Reynold. 562-4886
Keith z.YIIC. P.E., RLA
D8blrt Office
TO:
FROM:
RE;
Total PaU-: 2
[D) [E ffil [~ fl W [E lii1
wi FER; ?'DlI' I~
PLAI~NING& DEVELOPMENT SIJC~
CllY OF CLEARWATER
02/12/2004 15:29 7277239277
"r
ZAYAC
PAGE 02
It
tt
'- ~ ' .
~
V)
~
~
C)
~ ~
f:? Cl:
~ ~
~
~ :::5
~ Q.
~ ..
'-
-q: t5
<." C::>
~ -..
() <::J
9) ~.. c:J
~ I
~ C'...J (:::)
~ C)
~ (:)'
I
V) C:> ~
k? Q:) C\,j
...... 0')
~, ~ O'.l
-..
~ I
::t: ~ ~ '0
-..
......J g: , I
~. ~ 0)
G C\J
~ ~ c: I
~ (Q
8 ~'" -..
~ C\i'" ~ ~ ~
~ V) CJ
~ c::i
i::: ~
~ "'C ~ V) --:
~ ,..... ~ ~ ~
-J
~ ~ ~ C,j
~ ~ Q::
Cj C) ~ ~
......J Q
l . e
LL
i 0
l
>-
f-
U
FAX.COVERMEMO
CITY OF CLEARW A TER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) S62-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: KL (':f-1t ~/LI,-
FAX: "'7 fJ- pFrr
I
I
J
Phone:
-
FROM:
/11/ K.L J7se~ /fA. I/f
d-/3-dU
( SUBJECT:
Phone: Jb '2- ytP J (.
~'L_t:J~dJ- I/o-/; (
If-; ~ ~~Av~/
DA TE:
ME~.. AGE:
J,-IA
..
.
J~.L ~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) :2-
t
--
e
FLD2003-11061
117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Dabiri Office Building
DRAFT
Draft Conditions of Approval
(Pertaining to Land Resources Only)
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast corner of the site, no grade changes
are to occur within the drip line. An aeration system is to be designed to preserve
the tree. Use concrete in the design, as the tree will not tolerate lime rock.
2. Relocate the loading zone to the two spaces immediately south of where loading
is shown on the most revised site plan, ensuring a 24 foot wide minimum drive
aisle.
3. Items one and two above are to be addressed by a site plan revision, acceptable to
Planning Staff, prior to building permit issuance.
Draft date: 2-13-04
MHR
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./~~AME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
02/13 11: 29
97939855
00:00:48
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 02/13/2004 11:30
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
Kt\TH LA'fI\C & ASSO~\ATLS, \NL.
CNILt:.NG\NeeR1NG
LANDSCAPE ARO-lITECfURE
February 5, 2004
Mr. Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
City of Clearwater
100 s. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33758
RE: 117 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD FLD2003-11061
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
El\CI<)5ed please find 15 sets of rev;sedplans and atlaChments addressing ORC comments receiVed
dated January 29, 2003 including the following items:
stormwat~
A. The stormwater calcUlations on sheet 6 have been revised to include only 50% credit fur
existing impervious area.
B. The mitered end sectiOn connection to \he existing Drew Street _Ie is shown on sheet 6. A
mitered end section detail is shown on sheet 8.0.
C. The drawdoWO calculations for the treatment volume have been added to sheet 6. l\lso
included are 15 copies of the soils report.
O. The control structure detail has been added to sheet 8.0. A standard FOOT index callout ha'
been added to the structures shown on sheet 8.
name EnaineerinJl
" The drtvew8y closest to McMullen Booth Road has been revIsed to a one way in on~
dnvewaY. The second driveway has been revised to a twO way driveway.
C. The parking provided calculation has been corrected on the site plan
D. A loading space has been added to the parking lot.
F. It is noted that a traffic impact fee will be due before C.O.
~eneral Enaineering
A. A right of way permit will be obtained.
B. A health department perroa will not be required lor a single """,ice connection. An FOEP
permit will be obtained for the sewer connection.
C. The dumpster has been revised and a City standard detail provided on sheet 8.1.
-
e
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvrEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTII MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
January 6, 2004
Mr. Keith Zayak
Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc.
10 1 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setbacks (north and south)
from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet. (Case number: FLD2003-11061, 117
North McMullen Booth Road)
Dear Mr. Zayak:
The Planning Staff has reviewed your application as referenced above. After a preliminary review of the
submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is generally complete, but with the
following submissions or revisions necessary:
1. Based on your submittal, please provide an addendum to your application to address the
comprehensive infill flexibility criteria as specified in Section 2-1004. B.
2. The site plan does not show a dimensional arrow from the property line to the parking lot at
Drew Street. It appears to have a nine-foot setback.
3. Complete pages 5 and 6 of the application form. including the provision of signatures.
4. Provide a summary list identifying all submittal materials.
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on January 29, 2004, in
the Planning Department conference ropm - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service
building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. You or your client must be present to answer any
questions that the Committee may have regarding your application.
Any responses to the above comment may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional staff
comments will be provided at the meeting. Both the above stated comments and DRC meeting
comments must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by February 5, 2004
no later than 12 noon (provide 15 copies of all submittals). If you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4836.
Sincerely, /'A _ ~
~I'~ W. v~
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
Senior Planner
S:\Planning Departmenf'.,.C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next DROMcMullen Booth 117 Dabiri Office Building (OMfcMullen Booth
117 Completeness Letter.doc
BRlAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
e e e e
LL
I 0
!
I
>-
t-
U
TO:
FAX:
Phone:
FAX.COVERMEMO
CITY OF CLEARW A TER .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. 100 S. MYRTLE A VE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
Rett'h ~4(
'793- {J?rr
,
FROM: /ZtliCe- 77..-ey/tA I tlJ Phone:J6 2-- c,/,PJ ,
DATE: / - " - ~ ~. SUBJECT: h-{J ZotJ3 - //tJ6 /
MESSAGE: I1Ltl4e- i/R~ ~
,
!
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
;.-
ee
ee
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PIANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUHDING, 100 SOUTII MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
January 6, 2004
Mr. Keith Zayak
Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc.
101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setbacks (north and south)
from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet. (Case number: FLD2003-11061, 117
North McMullen Booth Road)
Dear Mr. Zayak:
The Planning Staff has reviewed your application as referenced above. After a preliminary review of the
submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is generally complete. but with the
following submissions or revisions necessary:
1. Based on your submittal, please provide an addendum to your application to address the
comprehensive infill flexibility criteria as specified in Section 2-1004. B.
2. The site plan does not show a dimensional arrow from the property line to the parking lot at
Drew Street. It appears to have a nine-foot setback.
3. Complete pages 5 and 6 of the application form, including the provision of signatures.
4. Provide a summary list identifying all submittal materials.
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on January 29,2004, in
the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service
building, 100 South Myrtle A venue in Clearwater. You or your client must be present to answer any
questions that the Committee may have regarding your application.
Any responses to the above comment may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional staff
comments will be provided at the meeting. Both the above stated comments and DRC meeting
comments must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by February 5, 2004
no later than 12 noon (provide 15 copies of all submittals). If you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4836.
Sincerely, /JI _ ~
I.t~~ u. v~
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
Senior Planner
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D lJIFLENending cases\Upfor the next DRC\McMullen Booth 117 Dabiri Office Building (O}\McMullen Booth
117 Completeness Letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
DATE,TIME
FAX NO. !NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
e
~RANSMISSION VERIFICATION R4IIR~
01/07 10:25
97939855
00:01:07
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 01/07/2004 10:27
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275624567
r" KEITH ZA'W\C &> ASSO<iIATES) INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING
'~'~~~~.",....,..,~,' -"~~- ~""" tJ~
;~,~'1;~r~'f:" . ~ . P'H' O"NE:'727 793 98'8'8 ," ' l'~"
'/j."~ ;';".: . 'J,_~~: .":!.. !C; _~'; ~ - ... ;';~~
:\..:;'" I" ~l\(." ,'.:" -; P:A v. 7277939855 " ,"!i"""!'1
to' 1"'iJ'.'~. i, . _ _ '2 nA. " . _. _ - '."~'
"";;~:i:W"t .:,; EMAIL: KEITHZAYAC@AOL.COM4r. <, ,";~ "1
. lW~....,." ~-~-..J;~.... a_~~
February 5, 2004
Mr. Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, FL 33758
RE: 117 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD FLD2003-11061
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
Enclosed please find 15 sets of revised plans and attachments addressing DRC comments received
dated January 29, 2003 including the following items:
Stonnwater
A. The stormwater calculations on sheet 6 have been revised to include only 50% credit for
existing impervious area.
B. The mitered end section connection to the existing Drew Street swale is shown on sheet 6. A
mitered end section detail is shown on sheet 8,0.
C. The drawdown calculations for the treatment volume have been added to sheet 6. Also
included are 15 copies of the soils report.
D. The control structure detail has been added to sheet 8.0. A standard FOOT index callout has
been added to the structures shown on sheet 8.
Traffic EnQineerinQ
A. The driveway closest to McMullen Booth Road has been revised \0 a one way in only
driveway. The second driveway has been revised to a two way driveway.
C. The parking provided calculation has been corrected on the site plan.
D. A loading space has been added to the parking lot.
F. It is noted that a traffic impact fee will be due before C.O.
General EnqineerinQ
A. A right of way permit will be obtained.
B. A health department permit will not be required for a single service connection. An FDEP
permit will be obtained for the sewer connection.
C. The dumpster has been revised and a City standard detail provided on sheet 8,1.
,
,
,
\
r '
t' ~.
e
e
D. There will be no medical office use in the proposed building. Therefore the backflow preventor
has been revised to a DDCV.
Plannin~
A. Enclosed are 15 copies of an addendum to the application addressing the comprehensive infill
flexibility criteria.
B. A dimension has been added from parking lot to Drew Street.
C. Pages 5 and 6 were noted as complete at DRC.
Solid Waste
A. The dumpster angle was noted as appropriate at DRC.
B. A City standard dumpster detail has been added to sheet 8.1.
Land Resources
A. The parking lot layout and grading has been revised to save the existing 30" pine tree.
B. A cross section has been added to sheet 6 showing the grading of the parking lot around the
30" pine tree.
C. The plans have been revised to preserve additional trees, and the tree removal tabulation has
been revised on sheets 4 and 9.
D. The parking lot layout has been revised to save the requested oaks, and the removal of the
tree at the NW comer. The tree removal tabulation has been revised on sheets 4 and 9.
E. Additional trees have been added to the survey and plans.
F. The revisions noted have been added to all plans.
G. The oaks is being removed
H. The retention pond has been revised to save the 6" oak at SW corner.
I. The water service has been relocated away from the 8" sand pine.
K. A tree preservation plan will be provided prior to building permit.
Fire
A. A FDC has been added as required on sheet 7.
B. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
C. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
D. The water mains and hydrants are existing. Clearances as noted are maintained in the
proposed design.
r"
,. ., .
e
e
E. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
F. A "no parking, fire department connection" sign has been added to sheet 5.
G. Building comments to be addressed prior to building permit.
H. FOC, existing hydrant and underground piping is identified on sheet 7. Utility details have
been added to utility detail sheets.
I. Ingress/egress radius has been revised to 28 feet.
Landscapinq
A. Irrigation notes have been revised as requested. An irrigation plan will be prepared and
forwarded with a letter of transmittal.
B. The hedges on the south and east property lines have been revised to Vibumum.
C. An additional viburnum hedge and five Drake Elms have been added to the west property line.
A Viburnum and India Hawthorn hedge has been added to the north property line.
D. The proposed plants within the visibility triangles have been revised to India Hawthorn.
E. It is a proposed tree and has been labeled.
F. The sidewalk has been revised to 4.0 ft in width.
G. Wheel stops have been added to the perimeter parking spaces. In addition all landscape
areas are protected by 6" curbing.
H. The Magnolia trunk specification has been changed from DBH to caliper.
I. "Multi-stem" has been added to the Crape Myrtle specification.
J. The size speCifications for the proposed trees have been revised to conform to code.
M. Additional wet soil tolerant plants have been added to the south side of the building along the
proposed stem wall.
N. Additional foundation plantings have been added to north, west and south side of building as
required.
e
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 15, 2003
Mr. Keith Zayak
Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc.
101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setbacks (north and
south) from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10
feet (to pavement), a reduction of the required parking spaces from 40 spaces to 36
spaces, a building height increase to 39.5 feet, and an increase of the FAR from 0.40 to
0.45. (Case number: FLD2003-11061, 117 North McMullen Booth Road)
Dear Mr. Zayak:
The Planning Staff has reviewed your application as referenced above. After a preliminary
review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further
development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application
is deemed complete. The next submittal deadline is December 26, 2003 (noon) to be reviewed
for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on January 29, 2003.
The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete:
1. The request for the proposed increase in FAR is incomplete as there are no reasons stated
to explain or support the request. Refer to The CountyWide Plan Rules, Section 6.4.1.
2. The application request needs to be reworded to reflect all deviations sought from City
code.
3. This site is located within the Pinellas County Countywide ScenicINon-Commercial
Corridor Master Plan. As such, the design of this site should be consistent with the
guidelines within the scenic non-commercial corridor master plan document.
4. A traffic analysis may be needed. See Section 4-801.C of the City of Clearwater
Community Development Code. Please contact City of Clearwater Traffic Operations
Engineer Bennett Elbo at telephone number 727-562-4775 for a scoping meeting.
5. The application form's general applicability criteria needs detailed responses.
6. What is provided as Exhibit A does not address the side setback reduction request.
7. The building height increase request mentioned in Exhibit A is not stated or listed as a
request within the Description of Request(s) section of the application form.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
-
e
Keith Zayak, Dabiri Office Building
December 15, 2003
Page 2
8. Provide a narrative to address the flexibility criteria for all waivers requested.
9. Provide copy of permit inquiry letter or SWFWMD permit submittal.
10. The site data table needs to state both required and proposed details.
11. The survey is not signed and sealed.
12. The parking study provided is not acceptable without back-up documentation.
The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application sufficient:
1. Reduce the proposed curb cuts to one ingress/egress.
2. Explain what is meant by net and gross building area.
3. All building elevation sheets need to show height dimensions.
4. Submit a reduced landscape plan, in color.
5. Identify all environmentally unique areas such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses and
specimen trees, including a description and location of understory, groundcover
vegetation and wildlife habitats.
6. Show fire hydrant locations.
7. Label the location of all easements.
8. The site data table needs to have the official records book and page numbers of all
existing utility easements.
9. Provide all signage information as requested on the application form.
Other comments.
1. The site plan can be reviewed as a Flexible Standard (FLS) submittal if the FAR limit is not
exceeded. It is suggested that you consider this level of review, as your proposed FAR is
close to meeting code.
2. Reconsider your proposed color scheme for the proposed building.
3. The proposed number of parking spaces does not meet code and your narrative does not
justify the parking reduction.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4836.
Sincerely yours,
..... - :,\
htl'~ U. (7~
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
Senior Planner
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\McMullen Booth 117 Dabiri Office
Building (O)\McMullen Booth 117 Incomplete letter. doc
, e -
'\
LL
0
>-
t-
O
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: /./c!- i~ 2::n-yCVt:.
FAX: '7{j\J- ~tf'JJ
Phone:
FROM: /tt/iL ~~y~1 dY
Phone: J b 'Z - Sf J'3 6
DATE:
;) - /7- tlJ
,
SUBJECT:
~ 206J- //0(,. /
/ / 7 /l1c/lfkl/~ I.$QS~
,12.v~
MESSAGE:
J'lL ~dr~/.
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
3
e
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 15, 2003
Mr. Keith Zayak
Keith Zayak & Associates, Inc.
101 Philippe Parkway, Suite 105
Safety Harbor, Florida 34695
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the front setbacks (north and
south) from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10
feet (to pavement), a reduction of the required parking spaces from 40 spaces to 36
spaces, a building height increase to 39.5 feet, and an increase of the FAR from 0.40 to
0.45. (Case number: FLD2003-11061, 117 North McMullen Booth Road)
Dear Mr. Zayak:
The Planning Staff has reviewed your application as referenced above. After a preliminary
review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further
development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application
is deemed complete. The next submittal deadline is December 26, 2003 (noon) to be reviewed
for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on January 29,2003.
The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete:
1. The request for the proposed increase in FAR is incomplete as there are no reasons stated
to explain or support the request. Refer to The Countywide Plan Rules, Section 6.4.1.
2. The application request needs to be reworded to reflect all deviations sought from City
code.
3. This site is located within the Pinellas County Countywide Scenic/Non-Commercial
Corridor Master Plan. As such, the design of this site should be consistent with the
guidelines within the scenic non-commercial corridor master plan document.
4. A traffic analysis may be needed. See Section 4-801.C of the City of Clearwater
Community Development Code. Please contact City of Clearwater Traffic Operations
Engineer Bennett Elbo at telephone number 727-562-4775 for a scoping meeting.
5. The application form's general applicability criteria needs detailed responses.
6. What is provided as Exhibit A does not address the side setback reduction request.
7. The building height increase request mentioned in Exhibit A is not stated or listed as a
request within the Description of Request(s) section of the application form.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bll.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
e
e
Keith Zayak, Dabiri Office Building
December 15, 2003
Page 2
8. Provide a narrative to address the flexibility criteria for all waivers requested.
9. Provide copy of permit inquiry letter or SWFWMD permit submittal.
10. The site data table needs to state both required and proposed details.
11. The survey is not signed and sealed.
12. The parking study provided is not acceptable without back-up documentation.
The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application sufficient:
1. Reduce the proposed curb cuts to one ingress/egress.
2. Explain what is meant by net and gross building area.
3. All building elevation sheets need to show height dimensions.
4. Submit a reduced landscape plan, in color.
5. Identify all environmentally unique areas such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses and
specimen trees, including a description and location of understory, groundcover
vegetation and wildlife habitats.
6. Show fire hydrant locations.
7. Label the location of all easements.
8. The site data table needs to have the official records book and page numbers of all
existing utility easements.
9. Provide all signage information as requested on the application form.
Other comments.
1. The site plan can be reviewed as a Flexible Standard (FLS) submittal if the FAR limit is not
exceeded. It is suggested that you consider this level of review, as your proposed FAR is
close to meeting code.
2. Reconsider your proposed color scheme for the proposed building.
3. The proposed number of parking spaces does not meet code and your narrative does not
justify the parking reduction.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4836.
Sincerely yours,
ht~.~ u, ~
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP
Senior Planner
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next DROMcMullen Booth 117 Dabiri Office
Building (O)\McMullen Booth 117 Incomplete letter. doc
DATE, TIME
FAX NO.INAME
DURA TI ON
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
12/17 15:138
97939855
1313:131:413
133
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 12/17/213133 15:113
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
12/17 15: 05
97939855
00:01:39
03
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIME 12/17/2003 15:07
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
It
.
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
March 16. 2004
FLD2003-11 061
E8
Mr. and Mrs. Massoud Dabiri
Keith E. Zavak. P.E.. RLA
117 N. McMullen Booth Road
o R 1 G , ~.f l\
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of parking
spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and
south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback
from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase
to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the
provisions of Section 2-1004.B.
EXISTING ZONINGILAND USE: Office (0) District; Residential/Office Limited (RlOL)
Category
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.67 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Residential (vacant)
Proposed Use: Offices
ADJACENT ZONINGILAND USES:
North: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District; Single family
residential
West: Institutional (I) District; Vacant
East: Outside city limits; single family residential
South: Office (0) District; Residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: Heavily traveled highway, single family residential, and vacant land.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: This .67 -acre site is located on the southeast side of the
intersection of McMullen Booth Road and Drew Street. The site is heavily wooded and has two
existing single-family residential structures with driveways accessing Bay Lane to the immediate
south. One ofthe structures has a second driveway accessing Drew Street. The property has three
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 1
.
e
frontages: Bay Lane, McMullen Booth Road, and Drew Street. Bay Lane is a very narrow road
with 18 feet of pavement width.
Proposal: The proposal is to demolish two existing single-family residential houses and construct
an 11,350 square foot office building, 39.5 feet in height, with a 32-space parking lot. The
proposal seeks an increase in building height beyond the 30-foot limit and a reduction from the 34
parking spaces required. Proposed access to the site is limited to two curb cuts on Drew Street.
The application is seeking Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of parking spaces
from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height
increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-
1004.B.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-1001 and 2-1004):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.39 X
AREA RATIO (FAR)
(0.40)
IMPERVIOUS 0.62 X
SURFACE RA TIO
(ISR) (0.75)
LOT AREA 0.67 acre; 29,085 square feet X
(minimum) (N/A)
LOT WIDTH 132.36 feet X
(minimum) (N/A)
FRONT SETBACK West: 25 feet (to building); X*
(25 feet) North: 10 feet (to pavement); and
South: 10 feet (to pavement)
SIDE SETBACK (20 East: 10 feet to (pavement) X*
feet)
HEIGHT (maximum 39.5 feet X*
30 feet)
PARKING SPACES 32 spaces X*
(3 spaces per 1,000
square feet)
*See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11061 - Page 2
.
e
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Section 2-1004 B):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The use or rrux of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X
Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X
uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16,2004 - Case H.D2003-11061- Page 3
~.
.
.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. X
2. X
3. X
4. X
5. of the X
6. X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
January 29, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to permit an 11,350 square foot office building with a reduction to the
number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, a reduction to the front setbacks (north and south)
from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development
under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. for the site at 117 N. McMullen Booth Road, with the
following bases and conditions.
Bases for AlJproval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast corner of the site, no grade changes are to
occur within the drip line, an aeration system is to be designed to preserve the tree, crushed
concrete is to be used in the design as the tree will not tolerate lime rock (submit prior to
building permit issuance);
2. That the site plan be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, to enlarge the landscaped
island between the two curb cuts and relocate the loading zone to two spaces immediately
south of where the loading zone is shown on the site plan date revised 2-3-04, ensuring a
24 foot wide minimum drive aisle (submit prior to building permit issuance);
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11061 - Page 4
"
e
.
3. That the site plan be revised to a) correctly state the parking required and provided parking,
and b) address the Fire Department concern for a 28 foot turning radius ingress/egress for
emergency vehicles (submit prior to building permit issuance;
4. That a Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to C.O. by the applicant;
5. That an approved right-of-way permit be obtained from Pinellas County prior to issuance
of a City of Clearwater Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension;
6. That an approved health permit be obtained from Pinellas County Health for sanitary
connection prior to issuance of a building permit;
7. That a reduced pressure back flow preventor device be required if the proposed use re-
quires one to be installed;
8. That a redevelopment credit of 50% be applied to existing conditions hydrology with 1
hour Time of Concentration (before building permit issuance);
9. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance;
10. That documentation of abandonment of septic system(s) be provided prior to Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That an irrigation plan sheet be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
12. That the landscape plan sheet be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
13. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
14. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located
underground; and
15. That all signage meet Code, consist of channel letters for any wall signs, and be architec-
turally integrated to the design of the building and site.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Atr~-61 ~ ~.-.d-__
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning DepartmenflC D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\McMullen Booth 117 Dabiri Office Building (0 MfcMullen Booth 117
Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 5
.
DREW
~
~
o
~ ~
~
Location Map
Owner: Massoud Dabiri
Case:
Site: 117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Property
Size(Acres):
PIN:
ORI
Atlas Page:
.
S,A. 60
CA.LlS
FLD2003- 11061
0.84 acres
16/29/16/19926/000/0010
292 A
e
e
Aerial Map
Owner: I Massoud Dabiri
Site:
117 N. McMullen Booth Road
I Case:
Property
Size(Acres) :
FlD2003-11 06 1
0.84 acres
PIN:
16/29/16/19926/000/0010
Atlas Page:
292 A
e
:" -"-
t")~~_1 I';;~ F;;'--' ;;--- '.;;.II_~' U;...._tp;;'e__1 I;;___~I~"-;I~
,':::~;~~!:;T~~':_-j ~:J [~,:;(itl
:--L.~:-' .! u:
I I : "-,
..~ : I_~ :
OJ'nJ ~-
e
I .. --
coil" ",'-- ~
o
OJ
,
,
- ,
,-,
g ~
c::; ;-~-I
I 1_,
, ,
, ,
, ,
..- -,
, , toO .. ~
, ,
OS/R , ,n , ,
, , , , ,
8 I"]: , '",. ,
::: I
OJ ;)1..__' ~ __.J
Q
It
~
0
0
a1
.- ~
,- IIJ
~.! .. ....a
5
I ~
=e
110
Owner. I Massoud Dabiri
Site: 117 N. McMullen Booth Road
r-- -,
, ,.
, ,
, ,
'.. ,
:~--_:
,-" ~
I 1_,
0<> '
." ,
(;)I_.. ~
1- -..
, '
, '
- ,
.,. ,
'" ,
;;:-
,;...... ...
,
'!: I
t'l) 1__1
--, 11'---.
I I # I
...." I
I " I
~ I: ~_I
~_I-I ...~
CHAMBLEE LN
c 0
;; (;):--:
, ,
, ,
1____.1
::l
~-~
, ,
, ,
,
-, ,
1_.. ...
~:--:
, ,
, ,
I r-'
, ,
~ ;;
iC;-, ;:;. --I
: ~ _.. : Ii
I I, ,
f 'I I
I .-- I I
~ -~.
::;-~_ :('1) :
I " --..
"
--I I I I
, "
'_ _1.._1
~ - ~.
;p '., ,., --.
I .' I
I ,I I
I.. L......_I
, .
,.. _I
LMDR
DREW ST
0'-,
, -,
, .-
, ,
1__'
...
'"
OJ
r----"'j
: '
-.._- ....'
t:l
"t...
,- ,
, ,
1_____1
'"
'"
OJ
,
,
.
__ ..__J
117
111
--.. ..
0',
I __I
~'--"1 ~II""-I ~1_I-i
1:_:_) :.1 J r_:~. _:
L.. _f '.. __I
i""" --~~, ~..-..
I (0): f)
!.._-______I ~_....I-
107; --:
~__ .--- i---,~ ----I j---: -.
; : ~ - :: I, I: I: 1
~I- II: : I 1 : 1 b ...,,_1
1 1 II~. 1-- !-t. 1 ",_
'_... : ~ - : ~-I 1 _" ~ - -
,~. 0 '-0 ::.--;;: _
;;: OJ'' ---
FEA THERWOOD CT
-
'_;-:~' '-"n,
: I: : ,'......
I 1 11__.. 6
~_;I_I !-. ~.... ~ :'
.... "':.../
,-'" --,
.... "'1
-'
, ,
0-
- 0
.._ I~-I r--;;:
I II" It '
: : ~- - ~~
'--...-...'
.,
--.:,
.' ."
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,
~ -, -...
--.~i ..-..a: :--I~_ ....
(0) I: P):: ~: _~-
I' I. 1- I to)
~-.__11---' :
-. ,
~f,fp \
-
\..\....
~
, .,'
, ,
: : --I
L _....~ I
.r.t- - - ---:
, ,
I-I :
I_____J
:-... - --- -: r~~~-_-_:
I
Zoning Map
Case:
, '.
- -~ - !
.,
iO n. to
;;.' 1 ..~.-~
, .,
: :-': :
~__I ~__:
~
.J -lij
, ,
, ,
:"'_1-1-
0-
OJ
~I--.I
, ,
, ,
,_ _I
~
-;;-_..--: ;----:
, ,
-;---- i-i__:
OJ
,
,
1_ ..:t__
1-"'- --
I'll!!'!
,
,
: , 0
,
, .
~-! 124 EE-
l- -"
, ,
, ,
, ,
I :lQD -
; , 115
'-.JJ6 , - -
, "
,_- -
I , .... , -
, 112 CI)
-, " -
, ,
, , ~ "
, , ,
, 108 ~
,
,., , ld9
, , ,
, --- -' ~
105
: '20 ",~'Oi
, '18 A~ ~
, :16
, '14 - . u
~2 -'-
FLD2003-11 06 1
Property
Size(Acres):
0.84 acres
PIN:
16/29/16/19926/000/0010
I Atlas Page:
292 A
,
~ .......
, '
Recreation
Recreation
Vacant (future church)
Vacant (future church)
.-
e
,- ,
, ,
~~~__J
110
~
~
o
o
CO
I
~
....I
5
:e
o
:e
e
I ';1- t I ... I .... - - ,... ... I I... :.;1'
tot-- fl')1 l")--- 1'1)___' ."""- .00').--- l'I) """"_..' ~_..- '.0,..-.' It'It-_-it ~--~ fI')
~ _, ~ _~ , u~:~D:AU:~~._, _,_ 'm.~~-,~.
0) : t'I) :_. I~_: : :t'?- : It') --: I~ ,::(0) ~ :: fI') 1_: rCQI I : I :
: -,_: l--~i ~jg-ie~ ~aiii~ tr ::. ::. j'-:oon ~ i _:rr-l) .
J ____." 'ij I
JiI ... '
roo: .__,-.; , o. ,'-' :--; --., .'--, .L~ -- ! ",
I :.. - :: : : : ~ : : 1_, I;"" - -: ~ ~ :: :: .... .. ~: ., I ~_,
~ lU '~:_-j :~.--: ];.: ~--j t:__f t.-: ~~-' :~._j :'~j :'-:.~
CHAMBLEE LN
'" '"
;;; _~r-:
, ,
, ,
1_ ___.J
~
/Ii- .
, .-
, ,
, :
-, ,
1__..
...
..---~
, ,
, ,
LJ-'-
....-- ~ ~.__ ~_ 1- ~.. ~
~I : :l"): ~ : .1'1) ~_:fI'): ;- '_,:(')___.
I I I --., I -. I ',--, I I I
I I I I I' " I I ,I I
: :-' Sing ~f~~il~~sl~~m':ai--
...
~I--" \()
..,. I l;r-~
- I -,
I :.!: :
~__I ~__I
............
.
DREW ST
r -,
, -'
, ,
~ ~ R ~ ;
roSin fe fadlily rtsj<l ebtiar"::
:-._-,.: :-----: :__: m__' i--,--':
;;;
.--- ..-
,
,
I_..t.. ..
,
,
,
--"
117
III
f~ ~~]
~.-
~. ~..- "'- - -
toO-~: fi': ::;; '_I :
. -ami y-r sideD
.ill.
~-----...~., ~..---.
.: fI'): ~ _~
lal'- - - 000-. . -._,
,-" ~
, ,
, .
, ,
'--. ,.4
~ '.,
107 I I
'--- -'
c:>
,- -"
, ,
, ,
, ,
I :17n
~
: "-'.116
, 0'
1- __
;-: ;-'--: f---:~ _on: roo': f--'-: r-:-l~(,~~~: :--'.
.," ',: : I I : I : ._1 ,._, ~_. .: ..,
, ",~ ,-- !o- " ~., ~-, ~ ..'
1__ :~_ :c.;. '~_' ~-........ "',:,'
l.g.... 2 .--I~'-- .a-- ..
FEATHERWOOD CT :~,:')
--;- __ 11)_ ~11--,.t-. a, -__I
_..~ __::_ L~ : ~-"'c;;:: ~i ;;__ ~17f.{} \
." ('\') I fI)' " I (0),..... I" '
i : l~i~ gfe '~~j Iy-r :S1~e . t~;d
__I_~ L_.. -:.~ ,_:--
-
/I~
roo
, 100-
~: :: 112 CI)
:: ~
-
,-
.
j--, JOB
, '
,-' :
, ,
'__.. _I
4
1d9
,
~
105
...
~- .--~.
r- 1<') I I to) I
I I'. II I
I II ,""
I I ...._-
1____-'
l)!..-----:
, ,
'0 ,
, ,
I_____~
-------,
:- -- --_..: [~~~---_:
: '20 -~
"'... 01
, ' 18 ....~ ~
, :16
, ,/4 - - --
, '2 -:-;-.
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner: Massoud Dabiri
Site: 117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Case:
FLD2003-11061
Property
Size(Acres) :
0.84 acres
PIN:
16/29/16/19926/000/0010
I Atlas Page:
292 A
.:..,- ';'
. . j. .;i' . . i:s . ..~~ ri.:,C:' ~.l" \. .
."- t.'\.\' ,-""' .~.~'_'''l''''''''''''''''--
',/". ....... . ;..,~, .' ..,....". /.:./:.r,..,.' '.
_;.'~_ oJ .~.' .... _ ........ -;...~....-:._~I:','~"..;. .t.. .,.,.7''''''~
.' ..r .. " ' .... . .' " /' .,. ...
._ . -'<!..,.,. .~~ . _, o. ....." , , ..-::.. .'.~' "I'J"': " .'"
. ~~. _ '. _.,,,,_ .~IT ,.\.- ." , .' . . '" ,V"":,,. i""--"':' i" .
. ''''' . ' ,c.' '.~ .C~'~. . ,.'.,' ...,.< ,";'f'I>.'o,"o.
. ", J ....'.0.'. +,..,..",,,,,~.~~"
....~_.... _ _ '-_''1-- .....~A >"....'. ~....::..-.::.:->,-!.,!,...~]".
,.~~'__' ..' . .. ' '1\ "'--.... ____~~.",,.~..1t.. ~
..' ' ..." .. '. ~ -.' '"
. ~:' _ "~:4;:":;",,,~,,,~~~"~.';'~"',~,
. 0 ----: . ". ,. ~.."...... .... ,.- ~,-,'
.".. .' .",. ". ......,..I!;.-"".'... '. t,. tI;';''''
,...,..... .. .' . .. ' ,.:"P ".,~.",..,~l'"
.'_"_ . .-i.<~.' . =-'~_ . ," .'" :..._,._~~~1
....' .. ~- .- --~-"'-' - - .' ~ _.;~.--, ~
.~~ '" .;;,~_ ,------ .' .- ,d . '0 .... "." i'''':-~-'' ,'.'
,;"..t:. ," _"'_ . ..',=.,.-:'- ~:i:~-~- ;;:"'J.t .' :"."'lm~ .~
~.,,~__..~.., . .'=~' ....~~.., 'C~ -~-~.. '....~
-"""', .....-=--==_.,,~....~' " .:,;" ~~ . "''''.""",,_ ,.-""'1
l~=~ " .-"".'....""".. """.r""":" .;.... '.,
--~~~~,,--~.).~....-,::'" ,:,.....~.-,..... .
,_~,~...~' ~-4>"""'-" -
. =' _~-;...;-':.:~;f;c. ,:" "
.1.....','. .'\;-ooi '
. .~.7':s...:..'.':!. -<. .
,,~ -- ::-..-~-~ ..
~. ~~~ . .
=\ . ~. ":.:--~ '
. ~ " j.~,
f" .:...-::~.,. \
......"l 1_",~
. t
,- .
...
~~~
..,."
--~
-~-;.. ~
Existing structures on site and looking east on Bay Lane
117 North McMullen Booth Road - FLD2003-11 061
e
e
Q)
t:::
~
~
~
tl:l
t:::
o
1ii
~
Q)
01)
t:::
~
o
.9
"0
m
Q)
...
.-
m
t:::
o
m
Q)
'""
=='
"0
2
...
m
.?f
...
m
.~
f.1.'l
"""
o
o
C'l
M
.....
~
~
.....
.....
\0
o
.....
.....
I
M
o
o
C'l
o
~
"O~
~
o
~
..:::
...
o
o
tl:l
t:::
~
~
(,)
~
:i
t"--
.....
.....
~lV2K1DX'WYWI
_~ '>:VJ
_"W:al.~
_~___D1M
1lI[::wns~~~.
~~'JN~I'JN'11lN:>
-::JNI '<;';U'v'DO';'S'V"-:J'I AVZ Will)!
.<;;crC;;ZL'LZL :3NOHd
c;;6 H01.J 'MOBNYH AJ.3J:VS
oo~ :tuns
, N ~nN3^V H~6 OOZ
'::>Nl 'A~010NH::>3.L
NOl.L::>Oll.LSNO::> .L011d
~ t''; ....' i ;1,
I H :'1' ,E ,
i if Ifi. " 1 ~ I
. .'!::~ to
i l~ !' Ii; i.' .1 Ii
....... '; i ,i~' I 5 I~!'" I t
i~ .'.1 ~ ~ ._ =~,,' i ! . i i1 I l !
.. 1: -.r 1; 5.:I.l:.'O & - b
i', =i o'! ! ;Hi! i.I
11' 'Ii I . ." ! ! :
: i !f i:.. ~ I ! ~~i~ i I i ~
~~ ~ ii~ l -' f Ji;!i t "! 1
n i ;'! f" h'I' j ;
,'" .1" . r' iu "','
, :.! ~ i-, 1 ';jI !. ,
U iir il! i i; ~i Ii f ~ ;;
:, ill} ,! i t !,1; !l 'i 1 i _','
~j!! .'.. ~t I ' H!~ J; H j 1
g Jl r~2 E j~~ } i! Ii l.!.~! !.i iJ! ~ j
w iU i ~H..:., If :!} _~.c 1 Ii.c j ~
~ h~ ~ Si {' ~r: t~ :~ri:" ~ I I;
(,) :i1 fl'!!l ! ~t o~ 'ii~ it :r ~ oi Ii
en ".'. !it. ~ ~; il ~fl;~~! ~~ ~ ~ ~~
z a; ii, H ~ h '3~ ~ I~p ~~ !: jl ! I;
< .f':2 .... .. ]j - 1t '-'hI) vi l'" -I'" 2 v-
...J 8' I:; 1. .. t ... P at !t- j &; lZ ~! Xli
...J ~5. f-g ~'_.. :,;.'.~\..!,' h iJ ,1 ~l:lit ~.. II ,," I ~i
: ~tihi.. ..~. H:~;$5;;" Hf11g.!:
~ il ;1~ :1:1 l~d : zi il ;1 !~~~ 11. 2~ tli ! 1~
w
CJ '" - - -
lit
il
NOltdllQS](I ll'l"aO _u........a.......... 0
NV'ld 3dV::>SONV'l _...._R'ilWlOl,.._
u.
1I3.LV.lIlIV31::> .0/0 HI::> 0
:JNI01InH 3::>lAAO 11llHVO , , _ 0>
, , , i
.)fI....tJYOllId " IH.lil."Y.) .I(l .lIe 01 1!'lSS1 O'OZ"I ,
..
IJ
H
&, .f .'/"
!i j
in ~
1: I !
:~ '
J~
'1
1 U
1 !~
! tl
I Ii
j f~
I :i
'! if
1:& ::1
11 it
~2 ~.t
~f ;~
,i "
...1 Eli
hh
Hn
UU
i,
i
t
!
.
;; !
,
,
:
I
f
!
I
,
,
:! !
. I
i fr ~
1 .n ~
r "E; ~
~ ,f
f i
!
, 1
...
1
...
...
I !
~" I
, i
I<
L
ih
~~~
1:1
;~i
I :
I
;"'
I I
.
t
!
~
,
I
,
!
II
I.
-Iu2 f: ~
i~ I Iii i
t~ .!:: J i
'.~'! }-.~! i.~ ! I , r
;: 1 5.;1 ~l r ~ 1 I
!H m In !i: H
,11 :.'!~,' 11 · .i i 'ItH
. .! . '.' 06, j
:.t !8 i~i i.: " ;"'.::. "j
i~ l~ t:o 4> ':~;J
. ~ 11. ii I:.; ~~"
-l~~: i;~" -~. ~~,~
!~:f d~ l! ~ ~i !. i7~;
Ii i} !j- ~i r r: It i~f~
ti if 1:"1 ,.. ';~! ~~ o'~I
l~~: ~'~2 !~!!t.d"
~~~~~~~~~c~~~o~~~~~~
i ~ ~ 0
~ g t!i ~ ?
~ ~ ~~ d .
~~ ~d~ d
q,il' n~~h
~d ~~d~.i
q~~ iq~Pf,
~H~_'PHP~~,
;j"-_....eq~~ "JaiL
~ai<l~ ~~.~.
o.p nH.~
:i~;i~ ~~i_
_ 8_ !'''is''
~-,
r ..
:.:! ~ i
2,,' It
'~ti; ~J
<i'1 ... H "
.;fi UB ~i 1.
il~! llll ~~ U
hlf 7777 ~~ u
I: a:: -"", i;
~ ~ i~ii ~ ~ u
::; :. r~":;nu &~.!
t= i!- .)~::::::g f ~ ~I
::i ~ i~U5HH !l ~ Ii
i :ho ~~~~~.. ~~!
,-
'\
(;
: r
I
c:
;iW
u>-
""<1;
c~
c~
l SUJ
~ i ~'~
~ -5
~L
~
~
.:r
c:::>>
~
c::J
-
"""-M~_""""~=--:
.
.
FLD2003-11061
117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Dabiri Office Building
DRAFT
Draft Conditions of Approval
(Pertaining to Land Resources Only)
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast corner of the site, no grade changes
are to occur within the drip line. An aeration system is to be designed to preserve
the tree. Use concrete in the design, as the tree will not tolerate lime rock.
2. Relocate the loading zone to the two spaces immediately south of where loading
is shown on the most revised site plan, ensuring a 24 foot wide minimum drive
aisle.
3. Items one and two above are to be addressed by a site plan revision, acceptable to
Planning Staff, prior to building permit issuance.
Draft date: 2-13-04
MHR
NextPage LivePublish
tit
e
Page 1 of 1
Gross floor area means the total interior floor area of a building measured at the inside face of the exterior walls,
but excluding parking garages, carports, stairwells and elevator shafts.
http://livepublish.municode.com/ 4/1pext.dll/lnfobase 14/1/1 c/14db/14ef?f=templates&fn=... 12/1912003
(-
'/e
Reynolds, Mike
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Fierce, Lisa
Wednesday, December 17, 2003 4:30 PM
Reynolds, Mike
RE: FLD2003-11 061; 117 N. McMullen Booth Road; Proposed Dabiri Office Building
remember: on a scenic collector (mcmullen booth); want better design for building and site; move stormwater away from
road; more neutral colors, need to see signs now, etc.
Lisa L. Fierce
Assistant Planning Director
City of Clearwater - Planning Department
note new email address-lisa.fierce@MvClearwater.com
727.562.4561 phone'" 727.562.4865 fax
Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan
GO BUC(K)S!
-----Original Message-----
From: Reynolds, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Anderson, Duanne; Bahnick, Glen; Barker, Brian A.; Bertels, Paul; Blackburn, Anne; Bruch, Tracey; Brumback, Garry; Byars, Linda;
Campos, Geraldine; Carrier, AI; Chaplinsky, Paula; Chase, Susan; Cottier, Kristi; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Elbo, Bennett; Finch,
Terry; Garriott, Kevin; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Gray, Joel; Hall, Bob; Hays, Robert; Herald, Rowland; Herman, Sandra;
Hinder, Randy; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Kinney, Jason; Kronschnabl, Jeff; Legters, Neil; Maran, Robert (Bob);
Martens, Cory; Matheny, Mark; Melone, Donald; Murrin, Lisa; Owens, Reginald W.; Phillips, Sue; Planning; Quillen, Michael;
Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Roberts, Jon; Stone, Ralph; Welker, Terry; Wiley, Joelle; Wilson, Denise; Yellin, Catherine
Cc: Nicodemus, Sherrie
Subject: FLD2003-11061; 117 N. McMullen Booth Road; Proposed Dabiri Office Building
DRC Members:
The above case is not scheduled for the December 23, 2003 DRC Meeting Agenda.
A letter of incompleteness has been sent to the applicant.
Thank you.
Mike Reynolds, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Clearwater Planning Department
Tel. # 562-4836
1
.
e
Reynolds, Mike
From:
Sent:
To:
Reynolds, Mike
Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:29 PM
Anderson, Duanne; Bahnick, Glen; Barker, Brian A.; Bertels, Paul; Blackburn, Anne; Bruch,
Tracey; Brumback, Garry; Byars, Linda; Campos, Geraldine; Carrier, AI; Chaplinsky, Paula;
Chase, Susan; Cottier, Kristi; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Elbo, Bennett; Finch, Terry; Garriott,
Kevin; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Gray, Joel; Hall, Bob; Hays, Robert; Herald, Rowland;
Herman, Sandra; Hinder, Randy; Hollander, Gwen; Hufford, Diane; Kinney, Jason;
Kronschnabl, Jeff; Legters, Neil; Maran, Robert (Bob); Martens, Cory; Matheny, Mark; Melone,
Donald; Murrin, Lisa; Owens, Reginald W.; Phillips, Sue; Planning; Quillen, Michael; Rice,
Scott; Richter, Debbie; Roberts, Jon; Stone, Ralph; Welker, Terry; Wiley, Joelle; Wilson,
Denise A.; Yellin, Catherine
Nicodemus, Sherrie
FLD2003-11 061; 117 N. McMullen Booth Road; Proposed Dabiri Office Building
Cc:
Subject:
DRC Members:
The above case is not scheduled for the December 23, 2003 DRC Meeting Agenda.
A letter of incompleteness has been sent to the applicant.
Thank you.
Mike Reynolds, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Clearwater Planning Department
Tel. # 562-4836
1
e
.
Reynolds, Mike
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Harris, Philip
Monday, December 15, 2003 5:26 PM
Reynolds, Mike
Smith, Janis
RE: Neighborhood Association(s) for 117 North McMullen Booth Road
Mike, I have listed the information you wanted below.
Thanks,
Phil
117 North McMullen Booth Road
Harbour Towne Condominium Association
Joan Hennly, LCAM
350 Bayshore Blvd.
Clearwater, FL 33759
725-2440
ihennly@progressivem.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Reynolds, Mike
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Harris, Philip
Cc: Smith, Janis; Gerlock, Frank; Nicodemus, Sherrie
Subject: Neighborhood Association(s) for 117 North McMullen Booth Road
Philip,
Would you kindly provide me with the name(s) of any neighborhood association(s), including the association name(s)
and contact person (address, phone, fax and email, as available) for the following:
117 North McMullen Booth Road (Case FLD2003-11 061)
I will bring up to you a map of the subject property to assist in your determination of affected neighborhood association
(s).
Thank you.
Mike Reynolds, Senior Planner
Planning Department
1
..
tit Conditions Associated Wit!'
FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Duanne Anderson
562-3039
11/24/2003 Fire department connection needs to be located at least 15 feet away from the building and within Not Met
Cr" 40 feet of the fire hydrant. The FDC shall be designed with metal breakable caps designed to
break with a single blow of a hydrant wrench. Fire protection appliances (Fire Department
Connection) shall maintain a clearance of 7 'liz' feet in front and to the sides of appliance.
11/24/2003 Ensure plans submittal indicate compliance with the following codes: Florida Fire Prevention Code Not Met
Jf 2001 Edition, NFPA 14 2000 Edition for standpipes, NFPA 72 1999 Edition for fire alarm systems,
NFPA 13 1999 Edition for automatic fire sprinkler protection, NFPA 101 2000 Edition, NFPA 70
(National Electric Code) 1999 Edition along with 4A-47 & 4A-48 and F.S. 633. Please address
. prior to building permit.
11/24/2003 G Stairway identification shall be designated by the side of the structure the stairway is located on by Not Met
the words "ALPHA" for the address side of the structure. The other sides identified clockwise as
"BRAVO", "DELTA" and "CHARLIE". If located in the corner of a structure the stairway shall be
~ identified by the two sides that intersect i.e. "ALPHA / BRAVO".
11/24/2003 Underground water mains and hydrants shall be installed, completed and, in service prior to Not Met
construction as per NFPA 241. Clearances of 71/2' ft in front of and to the sides of the fire
hydrant, with a 4' ft clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required.
11/24/2003 ~ Install Knox Box key safe for emergency access as per NFPA-1 3-6. indicate prior to BCP Permit Not Met
11/24/2003 ~
11/24/2003 ~
Fire department connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department
Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of transportation
standards for information signage.
Include on the Cover Page
Not Met
Not Met
Codes Used for this project:
- 2001 Florida Building Code
- 2001 Florida Building Code - Mechanical
- 2001 Florida Building Code - Plumbing
- 2001 Florida Building Code - Fuel Gas Code
- 2001 Florida Fire Prevention Code
- National Electric Code 1999 (NFPA 70)
-City of Clearwater Community Development Code, amended 2000, ordinance # 6526-00
11/24/2001-
Before Building Permit
Show fire department, fire hydrant, o DCVA, and all underground piping on dwg. Provide details on
utility detail sheet 8.2 - 8.3
Ingress / Egress must have 28 ft. turning radius for emergency vehicle (Approx. 47' ft in length)
access.
Not Met
11/24/2003 l
Not Met
Irrigation Condition
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
Under "Irrigation Notes" #3 states plans to be submitted prior to commencement of work. Plans
will be required prior to a Development Order.
Not Met
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Irrigation must meet the City Code per Section 3-1203.C., adjust plans to show 100% coverage,
rain sensor, automatic timer, etc. Plans must be submitted for Level 2 applications. Submit a
irrigation plan with letter of transmittal indicating all changes.
Landscape Site Triangle Condit
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
Print Date: 01/26/2004
CaseConditons
1 of 3
..
e
e
FLD2003-11061
117 NMCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
Landscape Site Triangle Condit
Not Met
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
sight triangles on north driveways not on property line. see below comment.
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Landscape Plan does not show the sight triangles as described in Article 3, Division 9, revise the
plan to show these triangles at all the street and driveway intersections.
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
Landscape Perimeter Condition
12/31/2003 - (A_D) Not Met
Change the plants on the south side of the property from the corner of the building to the first wax
myrtle to a taller hedge material to screen the parking. Recommend viburnum or podocarpus
which will remain full to the ground and can be maintained as a nice 4' to 6' tall hedge. For added
color, hibiscus (the City flower) could be used in areas where full sun is available.
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3-1202.D.
Primarily the west end of the property where there is very few plants shown on the plans. Please
cloud any changes on plans to indicate changes. Submit revised plan with letter of transmittal
indicating all changes.
Arden Dittmer
12/31/2003
Req'd Tree Size Condition
Not Met
562-4604
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
Plans show Magnolia with DBH instead of caliper, adjust plans to caliper.
Are the crape myrtle multi-stem?
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1202.B.1. Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting,
ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at
planting. Palms shown are "8' to 12' C.T. HT." which does not meet the minimum required. Make
changes, and cloud them on plans to indicate. Submit revised plan with letter of transmittal
indicating all changes.
Arden Dittmer
12/31/2003
Building Facade Landscape Co
Not Met
Landscape
12/31/2003
562-4604
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
Add some plants on the south side of building along the top of slope in retention area, a climbing
plant may be well suited here.
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with
frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress,
within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm
equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20
square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with
the remainder to be ground cover. Area along front of building has no landscaping on two street
frontages (retention area). Various trees and plants that can survive in wet conditions should be
used here.
Please cloud changes on plans to indicate changes. Submit revised plan with letter of transmittal
indicating all changes.
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
The sidewalk to the public R.O.W. to the north is 3' wide. Traffic may require this to be 4' wide for Not Met
H.C. access, if this is changed a revised landscape sheet will need to reflect this change.
CaseConditons
Print Date: 01/26/2004
2 of 3
Landscape
12/31/2003
e
e
FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Arden Dittmer 562-4604
Show existing tree canopies on plan, include trees within 25' of property lines.
Zoning Condition Arden Dittmer
12/15/2003 The sight triangles are incorrect 15' x 15' shown, should be 20' x 20'.
562-4604
Print Date: 01/26/2004
3 of 3
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
~-
T liD E MAR K
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/26/2004
10:45:00AM
FLDA008 Amendment Application L 1/20/2003 None SLN L 1/20/2003
Received SLN
J-DD070 Traffic Eng Review L 1/20/2003 1/912004 None HOLD B_E 1/15/2004 1. Remove driveway closest to the McMullen Booth and Drew
B_E intersection. Redesign existing driveway to accommodate
2-way traffic with city standard curve radii. (Access does not
meet minimum spacing requirements between intersections and
driveways of 125' between closest edge of pavement to closest
edge of pavement or curve returns. (City Development COd.
Section 3-102) ,
2. Suggest re-designing parking lot for circular flow to utilize
single access.
3. Site plan does not show the correct required number of
parking spaces of 35 only 34 is showing.
4. Need a loading space (12' wide and 35' in length) without
obstructing aisles or parking spaces. (Community Development
Code Section 3-1406)
5. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
** A Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to C.O. by
the applicant.
/ FLDD080 Engineering Review L 1/20/2003 None HOLD MEL 1/16/2004 1) Need to obtain an approved right-of-way permit from
S_R Pinellas County prior to issuance of a City of Clearwater
Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension.
2) Need to obtain an approved health permit from Pinellas __
County Health for sanitary connection prior to issuance of a .
building permit.
3) Dumpster enclosure to meet City Standards.
4) Reduce pressure back flow preventor device will be required
if the proposed use requires one to be installed.
FLDA245 Documents attached in L 1/20/2003 None L 1/20/2003
PPlan SLN
FLDA235 Letter To Abutting Prop L 1/20/2003 None L 1/20/2003
Owner SLN
Page 1 of5
CaseActivity..rpt
~
T I'D E MAR K
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/26/2004
1O:45:01AM
FLDA230 Letter of Completeness 11/20/2003 None 11120/2003
SLN
FLDA244 D.O. Mailed Out 11/20/2003 None 11/20/2003
SLN
FLDA018 Tree Survey Recd 11/20/2003 12/2/2003 HwO DONE R_A 12/2/2003
R_A e
FLDA130 Map Created 11/20/2003 None 11/20/2003
SLN
FLDA016 Drainage Calculation 11/20/2003 HwO 11120/2003
Recd SLN
FLDA015 Verify Traffic Impact 11/20/2003 HwO 11120/2003
Fees SLN
FLDD060 Legal Review 11/20/2003 None 11120/2003
SLN
e
Page 2 of 5
CaseActivity..rpt
~~
T I- 0 E MAR K
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/26/2004
10:45:01AM
1.12/15/03- The 30" pine tree near the SE comer is considered a
specimen and therefore removal will not be allowed. Redesign
site to incorporate into site. These trees are very sensitive to
construction damage, therefore requiring no disturbance within
the dripline.
l/9/04-Redesign incorporated the 30" pine tree, however, steps
need to be taken to insure that no grade changes occur within
the dripline and that an aeration system be designed to preserve
the tree. Also, these trees will not tolerate limerock, recommend
using concrete. Show a East/West x-section through the _
landscape island..
2. 12/15/03-A tree inventory was conducted which shows tree
health on a scale of 1-6, 1 being poor- 5 being outstanding and
6 being a specimen. A copy of this inventory will be supplied,
revise plans to try and preserve trees rated 3, greater efforts
must be applied to preserve trees rated 4 & 5 and trees rated 6
can not be removed, lastly, trees rated I & 2 must be removed.
Trees rated 3-5 require and inch for inch replacement, trees
rated I & 2 are not required to be replaced.
l/9/04-Save the oak tree between the two entrance drives,the
12" oak E of the eastern drive and the 8" oak atthe SW comer,
these are average to above average trees and shoulsd be
preserved. Remove the declining 14" oak tree at the NW comer.
Revise removal calculations on the demo and landscape plans to
reflect these changes.
3. 12/15/03-Tree survey is incomplete, all trees 4"DBH and
greater required to be survyed.
l/9/04-Show revised data on all plans. e
4.The 8" oak at the SE comer will not tolerate 1.7' offill, revIse
TOB or remove tree.
5.Revise TOB at 6" oak tree at the SW comer, require a 5'
radius from tree.
6.Reroute water connection away from 8" sand pine.
7. All of the above required prior to CDB.
8. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a Certified
Arborist, Landscape Architect, Consulting Arborist or specialist
in the field of Arboriculture. This plan must show how the
proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the
critical root zones (drip lines) and how you propose to address
these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root
aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show
actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root
Page 3 of 5
CaseActivity..rpt
~
Tf'DEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/26/2004
1O:45:01AM
pDOlO Stormwater Review
FLDD020 Fire Review
/ FLDD030 Park & Rec Review
J.DD040 Solid Waste Review
FLDA140 Site Visit
FLDA050 CDB Meeting
FLDA040 DRC Meeting
FLDD016 CRT Review
11/20/2003
None
DONE
EES
1/ 16/2004
S_R
prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail and dripline
limits. And any other pertinent information relating to tree
preservation. This requirement must be met prior to Building
Permit
1. Vertical walls allowed on 2 sides of retention pond not
adjacent to ROW, adjacent parcels etc...(met).
2. Redevelopment credit of 50% must be applied to existing
conditions hydrology(before CDB).
3 1/2' offreeboard required for retention pond (met).
4 Provide tie in details for stormwater discharge onto DrewA
Street. ...
5. Retention pond must draw down in less than 24 hours and
require soil boring to verify seasonal high water elevation.
(before building permit)
6. Provid drainage structure details (before building permit)
SEE CONDITIONS
The conditions associated with this case will be addressed prior
tp building permit
EES
11/20/2003 11/24/2003 1/2/2004
D_A
1/212004
D_A
None
DONE
11/20/2003
11/26/2003 None DONE
11/2612003 No comment since non-residential property less than I acre.
DWR
DWR
11/20/2003 1/12/2004
1/12/2004 Need to re-configure enclosure angle
TJG Dumpster enclosure needs to be built to city Specs and shown
on detail page
None HOLD
11/20/2003
11/20/2003 e
SLN
11/2012003
SLN
JVS 1/2212004
SLN
11/20/2003
SLN
None
11/2012003
None
11/20/2003
1/29/2004 None DONE
11/20/2003
None
Page 4 of5
CaseActivity..rpt
~~
TI"DEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/26/2004
1O:45:00AM
FLDAOlO Application received
FLDD012 Zoning Review
L 1/20/2003
L 1/2012003 None
SLN
None
FLDD014 Landscaping Review L1/20/2003 L2/15/2003
FLDD042 Environmental Review L 1/20/2003
FLDD090 Harbor Master Review L 1/20/2003
None HOLD
A_D
L2/1012003 None DONE
S_R
None
Page 5 of5
L 1/20/2003
SLN
L 1/20/2003
SLN
L2/17/2003 see conditions
A_D
-
L2/1O/2003 1. Provide documentation of abandonment of septic system(s)
S_R prior to CO.
L 1/20/2003
SLN
e
CaseActivity..rpt
~~
T(IDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/20/2004
9:17:lOAM
FLDA008 Amendment Application L 1/20/2003 None SLN L 1/20/2003
Received SLN
FLDD070 Traffic Eng Review L 1/20/2003 1/9/2004 None HOLD B_E 1/L5/2004 1. Remove driveway closest to the McMullen Booth and Drew
B_E intersection. Redesign existing driveway to accommodate
2-way traffic with city standard curve radii. (Access does not
meet minimum spacing requirements between intersections and
driveways of 125' between closest edge of pavement to closest
edge of pavement or curve returns. (City Development COd_
Section 3-102)
2. Suggest re-designing parking lot for circular flow to utilize
single access.
3. Site plan does not show the correct required number of
parking spaces of35 only 34 is showing.
4. Need a loading space (12' wide and 35' in length) without
obstructing aisles or parking spaces. (Community Development
Code Section 3-1406)
5. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
** A Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to C.O. by
the applicant.
FLDD080 Engineering Review 11/20/2003 None HOLD MEL 1/16/2004 1) Need to obtain an approved right-of-way permit from
S_R Pinellas County prior to issuance of a City of Clearwater
Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension.
2) Need to obtain an approved health permit from Pinellas _
County Health for sanitary connection prior to issuance of a
building permit
3) Dumpster enclosure to meet City Standards.
4) Reduce pressure back flow preventor device will be required
if the proposed use requires one to be installed.
FLDA245 Documents attached in 11/20/2003 None 11/20/2003
PPlan SLN
FLDA235 Letter To Abutting Prop 11/20/2003 None L 1/20/2003
Owner SLN
Page 1 of5
CaseActivity..Ipt
~~
T'IDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/20/2004
9:17:lOAM
-
Page 2 of 5
CaseActivity..rpt
~~
T. IDE MAR K
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/20/2004
9: 17: lOAM
FLDD050 Land Resource Review L 1/20/2003
1/912004
None
HOLD
R_A
1/9/2004
R_A
Page 3 of 5
1.12/15103- The 30" pine tree near the SE comer is considered a
specimen and therefore removal will not be allowed. Redesign
site to incorporate in to site. These trees are very sensiti ve to
construction damage, therefore requiring no disturbance within
the dripline.
1/9104-Redesign incorporated the 30" pine tree, however, steps
need to be taken to insure that no grade changes occur within
the dripline and that an aeration system be designed to preserve
the tree. Show a East/West x-section through the landscape
~~ -
2. 12/15103-A tree inventory was conducted which shows t~
health on a scale of 1-6, 1 being poor- 5 being outstanding and
6 being a specimen. A copy of this inventory will be supplied,
revise plans to try and preserve trees rated 3, greater efforts
must be applied to preserve trees rated 4 & 5 and trees rated 6
can not be removed, lastly, trees rated I & 2 must be removed.
Trees rated 3-5 require and inch for inch replacement, trees
rated 1 & 2 are not required to be replaced.
1/9104-Save the oak tree between the two entrance drives,the
12" oak E of the eastern drive and the 8" oak at the SW comer,
these are average to above average trees and shoulsd be
preserved. Remove the declining 14" oak tree at the NW comer.
Revise removal calculations on the demo and landscape plans to
reflect these changes.
3. 12/15103-Tree survey is incomplete, all trees 4"DBH and
greater required to be survyed.
1/9104-Show revised data on all plans.
4.The 8" oak at the SE comer will not tolerate 1.7' offill, ree
TaB or remove tree.
5.Revise TaB at 6" oak tree at the SW comer, require a 5'
radius from tree.
6.Reroute water connection away from 8" sand pine.
7. All of the above required prior to CDB.
8. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a Certified
Arborist, Landscape Architect, Consulting Arborist or specialist
in the field of Arboriculture. This plan must show how the
proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the
critical root zones (drip lines) and how you propose to address
these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root
aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show
actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root
prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail and dripline
CaseActivily..rpl
~
T, IDE MAR K
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1/20/2004
9:17:lOAM
FLDDOlO Stormwater Review
11/20/2003
None
DONE
EES
EES
limits. And any other pertinent information relating to tree
preservation. This requirement must be met prior to Building
Permit.
1. Vertical walls allowed on 2 sides of retention pond not
adjacent to ROW, adjacent parcels etc...(met).
2. Redevelopment credit of 50% must be applied to existing
conditions hydrology(before CDB).
3 1/2' offreeboard required for retention pond (met).
4 Provide tie in details for stormwater discharge onto Drew
Street. _
5. Retention pond must draw down in less than 24 hours an~
require soil boring to verify seasonal high water elevation.
(before building permit)
6. Provid drainage structure details (before building permit)
SEE CONDITIONS
The conditions associated with this case will be addressed prior
tp building permit
11/26/2003 No comment since non-residential property less than I acre.
DWR
1/16/2004
S_R
FLDD020 Fire Review
11/20/2003 11/24/2003 1/2/2004
None
DONE
D_A
1/2/2004
D_A
FLDD030 Park & Rec Review
11/20/2003
11/26/2003 None DONE
DWR
FLDD040 Solid Waste Review 11/20/2003 1/12/2004 None HOLD 1/12/2004 Need to re-configure enclosure angle
TJG Dumpster enclosure needs to be buH t to city Specs and shown
on detail page
FLDA140 Site Visit 11/20/2003 None 11/20/2003
SLN -
FLDA050 CDB Meeting 11/20/2003 None 11/20/2003
SLN
FLDA040 DRC Meeting 11/20/2003 None 11/20/2003
SLN
FLDD016 CRT Review 11/20/2003 None 11/20/2003
SLN
Page 4 of 5
CaseAclivity..rpt
~~
T.IO E MAR K
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
1120/2004
9: 17:1OAM
FLDA010 Application received
FLDD012 Zoning Review
1112012003
FLDD014 Landscaping Review 1112012003 12/15/2003
FLDD042 Environmental Review 1112012003
FLDD090 Harbor Master Review 11120/2003
11/20/2003 None
SLN
None
None HOLD
A_D
12/10/2003 None DONE
S_R
None
Page 5 of5
11120/2003
SLN
11/20/2003
SLN
12/17/2003 see conditions
A_D
e
12/10/2003 1. Provide documentation of abandonment of septic system(s)
S_R prior to CO.
11120/2003
SLN
e
CaseActivity..rpt
e Conditions Associated Wit'
FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Irrigation Condition
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
Under "Irrigation Notes" #3 states plans to be submitted prior to commencement of work. Plans
will be required prior to a Development Order.
Not Met
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Irrigation must meet the City Code per Section 3-1203.C., adjust plans to show 100% coverage,
rain sensor, automatic timer, etc. Plans must be submitted for Level 2 applications. Submit a
irrigation plan with letter of transmittal indicating all changes.
Landscape Site Triangle Condit
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
sight triangles on north driveways not on property line. see below comment.
Not Met
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Landscape Plan does not show the sight triangles as described in Article 3, Division 9, revise the
plan to show these triangles at all the street and driveway intersections.
Landscape Perimeter Condition
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
12/31/2003 - (A_D) Not Met
Change the plants on the south side of the property from the corner of the building to the first wax
myrtle to a taller hedge material to screen the parking. Recommend viburnum or podocarpus
which will remain full to the ground and can be maintained as a nice 4' to 6' tall hedge. For added
color, hibiscus (the City flower) could be used in areas where full sun is available.
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3-1202.0.
Primarily the west end of the property where there is very few plants shown on the plans. Please
cloud any changes on plans to indicate changes. Submit revised plan with letter of transmittal
indicating all changes.
Req'd Tree Size Condition
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
Plans show Magnolia with DBH instead of caliper, adjust plans to caliper.
Are the crape myrtle multi-stem?
Not Met
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1202.B.1. Code requires trees to be 10' in height and 2 1/2" cal. at planting,
ornamental trees can be 8' in height and 2" cal., and palms must be 10' clear and straight trunk at
planting. Palms shown are "8' to 12' C.T. HT." which does not meet the minimum required. Make
changes, and cloud them on plans to indicate. Submit revised plan with letter of transmittal
indicating all changes.
Building Facade Landscape Co
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
Print Date: 01/20/2004
CaseConditons
1 of 2
e
-
..
FLD2003-11061
117 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
Building Facade Landscape Co
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
12/31/2003
12/31/2003 - (A_D)
Add some plants on the south side of building along the top of slope in retention area, a climbing
plant may be well suited here.
Not Met
12/15/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with
frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress,
within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm
equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20
square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with
the remainder to be ground cover. Area along front of building has no landscaping on two street
frontages (retention area). Various trees and plants that can survive in wet conditions should be
used here.
Please cloud changes on plans to indicate changes. Submit revised plan with letter of transmittal
indicating all changes.
Landscape
12/31/2003
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
Show existing tree canopies on plan, include trees within 25' of property lines. Not Met
12/31/2003
The sidewalk to the public R.O.W. to the north is 3' wide. Traffic may require this to be 4' wide for Not Met
H.C. access, if this is changed a revised landscape sheet will need to reflect this change.
Zoning Condition Arden Dittmer
12/15/2003 The sight triangles are incorrect 15' x 15' shown, should be 20' x 20'.
562-4604
Not Met
Print Date: 01/20/2004
CaseConditons
2 of 2
-- e
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case No. ~L Odoo3- I) 0 (P Meeting Date: f);t~'- /-). 7-0Y
Location: 1\ l AI (f\ (' -' ~ ~(:jd ()41
X Current Use: . Ie I .r:~ lOAd- - j\Qp..vtl ~A
D Active Code Enforcement Case ~es:
D Address nUmber@(nO) (vacant land)
D LandsCaPin@(nO)
D Overgrown (yes) @
D Debris (yes) ~
D Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes~
D Building(s) (good) (fair~(Vacant land)
D FenCing~~OOd) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
D Paint (good) (fair) ~~gariSh)
D Grass Parking (yes) ~
D Residential Parking Violations (yesrQ
D Parking (/a striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
D Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed)
D Outdoor storage (yes) ~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
\\~[D 4
Date: Reviewed by:
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03
Telephone: 6~ J--Y7 c;}- j'
e
Map Request
Planner Name: Mike Reynolds
Case Number: FLD2003-11061
Date Requested: February 23, 2004
Date Requested for: March 4, 2004
Maps Needed
~ Aerial Photograph
D Proposed Annexation
~ Existing Surrounding Uses Basemap
~ Location Map
~ Zoning/Flexible Development Map
D 2" x 2" Location Map for Newspaper
D Future Land Use
Required Documents
~ Legal Description
~ Survey
~ Map with Proposed Site Highlighted
Map Name
Owner: Massoud Dabiri
Site: 117 N. McMullen Booth Road
Case:
Property
Size (Acres):
PIN:
Atlas Page:
-
FLD2003- 11061
.67 acres
16/29/16/19926/000/0010
283 A 292 A
~L~ :Lo()~ - Ii
hi
M.
1-
~1
-1'
I
I
1
, I
I ~,
II '
I
. -I" ,
- I
7.,"; """'oleMONVt"".'ff.-
< ;/" i
I
/ w
~DF;
,'~ ., )'
~_..
J
/
/'
!i
...~,=""""
I
'"
r.
.......~"'\.
a
l I
I
"
!
o
. GRAND VIEW
I( Molt
" I
'ii, _ _
MCRRU
!
o 0
f5.5'
0"
llIIl!W
I
11.71
II ~,' III .,; ,. ;" I ,,;, ~ ~"
III! ! I · i ~,
If. 15D74 I
"11 f
IOtJ!IiDR
- .
I ~ --"--,.
'-..i~',.7 I.... ~ .
f . .IT.. '., L
. -: I 1&-
- T
<<_____---.J!
I:MHP
p~~""':..
_ .,
.I[ f:Dm.... ',JfliD" ~." o'
J f Iii i f ~
. f , ~.~~, , :
r
I
OS/R
\
J dJ~
.; .;
.!-I ..
c.JDo tI ~/:rMWCb p~
//7 A/hc "//U~ ~~
7l-/
.."
~~II
/J.-,
-,-
" .~
I'i..'. .Ii ",'i'" lmI
~ =.' . ~. i. i. I _. ' ! i ·
I ~~ I .
~ . .. I ST. i
. .. on. i I i 11,
~ , , ." ff II II N; I
'" ~I ~ n
a" ,. 17 .. " . ;rr 0(
6U .it.. o. if f -lIt
. . .. I' -
. ~ - I;. r
'" H M III 11;
"
~.. .
(';i
!,
.
_ I _
!
.- .
.. .,
~
PEllAO
SAN
.
-
1 JI"J K
'u
I. II
..., '>., .....)
,~
43 i #J
,J;I ~ '" ..
.
P, - - I.U
.. .. ..-19
BEANAllONO
i ~ ~
,.
.:I~.-
..~i...? .i....'
- -
!! !r 4
...l!: 1:.
STREET
AVENUE
,. JII It ..
. ~!ll' -~
I~; _fl~1\irll~ ~c ~: :: .:~. s~ : : .; ~III'~ n
.SAN . m;..T'. .! -" - - "; ~ a a a
1m, "" 'il =. · . i
~;j :, : : : : ::: ',: I '. ' ~ ~~ ~, : , -." l II ~
, TNOMASROAO. . 1~1'1.111;
~ oft II.
. '" . "I I -.
f1 I ,', 6 li ..! ~ J i i
..i
. i -
UZQ
Q
OS/R
.~
....
I
tti i
~ ,~i\..
ii;lti.i~
~... BOROEAUX LANE
-; tJ,rii"l! ! !' r
Q .. .. .. ~ 4f ., ..
..............
.~l
,. .- J ~-
. ~ \.1_' ~ ...... ...
v .
,. ~ \ol~' , !
!r ," '- 2111 , ~,
; _'" .>r~
:rVI '1Jl J.J::" i I
t i · ~ !' ~ - . ~::\;>,~ no
. : ~'~ ': I ~ I f ~ " I. ., i
l . .. ~ -
'!.
~ 11~'
,/
u ~
i ~ t t l ;: ~ : I to' :
~.
~~i~!!I~ ~!~i[ll
. .. .. .. .. ..
dt'1:'
... ':: .",:~~" >.~:~-
,.' . . I ' i . ! . I . i . i '..:. 7 .; ~, . . I . ~. . ~ ,. Ife
.~ . ~~~:~ :~ .~~~.~. . .V l ! I:'~~ ~,~-~ 1,~. ,': il~; I-
, H" : I' L.:...c! ,,, J.t. ="",J
!" ~" i " i" II i H fJ I, II~ II ~1a.V1 i, ~, ,~.--,
i i ''< .....J.". to; ~ ~: il ~ALOIJIIl. .
_!rD~ _~w
~~ -.:, ,.)
- ....: 1 . . ,\,
- ~ ~ ~/ :
- -=~-'\...,..., 'ttf," m.-....,,-.- rrrrrwr.1~.'J
Il..:.. , . . - ", ,..........- ...
'.' ~ .",":".o.i ~ I -~,', ill ~ ~ Fl~
.. . :~~ ::~ I' ~' )_:
t :?~m~ -.
JW
;-'0"
fl'
HI
"'S(
... --
lr'~';~";
, "
.
. =;"1;:" .
'!I' ';' ,
n/l~
=-
..--. iii..il''''''''-
r-...
~
~
~"
~~
~~
,~ \
x~
~.
~
~4
~~
~-w
\
)
::t.~
N
o
?
...
{~~
.;.:~.:
'::}~~
":':~'
<l
C
0:
('.
II
!
...
. ...
..,.
....
""
,..
g
~ ..
~
....
It
II
iii.
:::::.:;~:.,
.._.QI_.__.....r--Wt~i:
L s. roo '.00
~~~ .i ~L--.or~
ill: ~7i~~~:.
:i,II~.! ~__-"-~
-"'-::vT"" 11 _.JJ hi.. ~ i:i
."'1i.:;:;:':
fiJl
""fWOt
fl// 200:1- <P 9'''-0
..;-t> 6 ~ (),J' ~ ~ . /f,( A-,4
1;01" OVIH[D 1-. 1 J"
1O'm;41f, ~ ' hm- .
'.'1 I 2 l
~~~ Ta
tB ~Zl 1 ~ ~ ~~ . ~I B !i I ~ i i
j _ 2 3' 5 6 7 8 ~ 10! 11 '2 13 ..
1. ~~311' 51 6 7 811\9 10 I P~2~ i' 15
~~i j= . I; ~ ~ _'4' ;. !;
!~ 2 II , .. . i ~.
fjfl ~ lii OlARlES ~ Vi
A~{j L 1 · I~ fi ~ I ~ $. ij .~J i ;
2 3 I, 5 6 7 81 9 10 111 12 13" 16
a. "'" I ~
1
j: /f 'f-'
%! /i'~'..'
~." ""., li'o:. 13. t37 /6 3~
O~ .... I ~; [2 :'N'fD:r '"' · : ~ ~.
, ... ~ !!::I e ~ e
-:::"r,Z"J_y~ ,Z..}. ~; 4 5 6 7
90.18 ~'II"..
II.... 50 ,~..-. ,"t...
rIi ~~'#~.'
50 .,."lJ ." · i~ I. 9/ 10 11
00" i!' ;,.; .~ I I
fOll ~j~ l~h~ I~ ~,~
)- ..~ [.: I :!!!! N~T II~t I AOAO
t\. P j!........... PY"'':::-' ,JItJ:~/ y " ""I.l~c. A. "82 SII~Ti E ?I.flAf"',. PQ;T ~ ~ RO~ ~- - 1 T 7- :..~,
71-'-" 8 :: - ... '/ S;J::2;1~/:: "',.30"61~
I ~. ~70- '&7,,}.: ,7 ~ 5 'p 2.dY / 2 6 ~JIt Ii' I 1-- -I-,
I '- 1174"" 't'/ .::Jl.~ I'''' y.l Ii I 2 3 .t 5 _6_ -;' 8 ~ gl I'.~.t.
1 "- 11 31 30 29 28 271 -.-.. I ".,. =~. .
"" 12 '.'''"" ,.. ~ ~i/ ,/e 178 IITI 26 27 ".,-, I " ~~ J
'" .... , ,m "'" 25 1 ""I,.... 3J 3' "m ~
i--. ~ ~ 13;"'- tC::OOVA, : "10. 'H' ,"', 2' 2 ....I I 'H' 32 35 ,m ,...11''"'
@i Ili. ~ III 6 \ ,,~,.. '..; 26/ / 11 ..11'.... ~,..""2J J ,.. :~, 'H' J1 -.36 ,... ~~:"'2
I ,,] ~ H 7. J;... ~5.flt" '1' / '2r--.,...<,,,P22 , '''''<:.." JO 37 ,...
~ '---ff- 8 (J...... "6123 , , 1\:::01_ "N, I , ' ""
I..' Z !PACHE lRl...c . ~ 16 I." 22 l 13 /111 184,.0 21 5 '14 I "" 29 38 II,. 1 'ts..7
~ \'AC. tt1,~ '. .It '16' " -.# /17 20 6,." I I ~u 28 39 ~!4',S
la!O - ] ....e: '1 17"10: ....,' U II., '"15 I ""
8 ~ ",~ /'y 21, ~ I 15 7 I I 27 /5,0 164 ....115.i!.t~
~ 11 '0,) /~ ~ ~: ~ " I'f'.-'..' 19 1f6"11~ >-!!!.!-::!..z!
...:.::s . '." , -t;t.... ~ --::-! ...,! 11. 16 "" li1 "" 18 8 "" I I'''' 26...v.M ,.,~7!',\\..
I ~ " .. >> .I /)' ::t= 19'''' / ///.2J 22 ~7 ""~. II.. 16 9 .... I, I~$/,;l t I ;;;
~. " - "fl'rl ~ ,...\ ~. "" 1R 15 tV -r1! "" I j=
I '--+- '.. ~ ,." 6 20 f E 5" ,,,......... "'" ~... '0.... :.- /~ i T 20 19 \::ztI? :!.!l
U/OI LA~~ ~ fi.t.~~ 19IZS~~] VAC. 1911-t03 l!J~ '", ~~ ~~ fl.21 20 '(If .If 12~1 .. la,;: {D;IV;::: 1Pf~
:.........+- I f"~ I} ... Q 14 IJ! V.d'Jl'1 I 22 I" -/ J!!!!-~
---;.... ~ "1\ ~ ".. :t ~ -.p~ I I Vi' 39
: i : JC . .. , J..... ~2 53 '1" ~ 9 ~ l ~ ~ ~"~ ~ ....: :;~ 2J~ / 38 '/ 2ti
~ ct:"""u. ",,, "n .~'" !I ~ [ [t ~ l~ .t<o~~/ I I/fs 37 ~ ..",!\!!
, J 2..:, C '-+-. .n " ~H- t 2' <D ~ OVERBROOK IUI~~Jl'O I'''':::~:'
; ~ U- '2526 2726 29 ~ ~ARK I : ' ,I/~ t::$!,14
))F==HLflF.LL~lIJ.I~II~~II~ II ~III~ I I ~ '00 , In JJ I I ,." ~
~
on O'ttN[O
., D 117~1I (D.lt. 4]1.159)
I
Clnl CMtC
~T' f
: 1
I~
I
,
I
,,/01
'&. ~
8,
~
~I
.~
~
Qj
II
::;;
:f
11.
~
:;t
a
I
on~"
.., I "
"
,)
~
~
t
..:
~
5
~
c
<
u
p
., 15"00
u
J~;.l RAINBOW ~. i r A
. ENDJ9-36 ~
:: A-H .. S 6 7CJ~8 g 1
J o'b1~...~ 0 19 18~7 16 1
ii ~ I ~~cot'fi>;l l, -
1Q ,,"t; ~i i
-I
~:::
i:~
~
$ IIARINE
~? 12/G' ~~I ,,17 ~
HOM\",~E~~ ·
,l~.f. 6~=.7 ~ 8
IfU' ~~5 i ili.L ~
I~e
iC
c
'E
~i
a CClWNCOOAE STRtET 51
~ i ~ ~ &i i!
2 I
5 B 3 -22
22101
~1'O.ss
Lt~1
5 6 7 ~ I
U i la
CftANAoA
~ ~ ~" t=-4- s
2~ ~q ·
1 r.:\ 5~....,.
/" 10 ~~ ~~~ill
/ f~ ~ ~ tM ~
[ STARBOARD WAY ~ w ~R g'"
f~ ~ .) 5,,,, ~ HI-
':' - < I;;;-;;jt-. J6
/, 2 3 . ~ ~H g
.I ~ ~ a
13 12 {:J 10 ::.e::..:: :=-:HI ~
<<I ~ ~~! 9 10#0 ==f=i ~
>>,,1 "llOli WAY 51 101/
1I ,,,,' .~ . "; t _' 3
~ t~II~1 ~ ~'~~ s ~ I :i1::!,tl~1 lOll 3 ':/ q ';'/h=w...= 2 eo
3"4'01 I \ I W 1011 2 /!: h Ql \V5 7
1 2 3 '51 6 7 8 9 101 Y '2 OIl!, I---f- ,~
~; I~ ~ ~.8;t i. 20 I 22 23 2' 25 26 2~1:28 "c-- ~"" ~ ..,l", 21011
,~ ~._-... 3D 31 2.... 3~ lOll
".. . 2: ~~ ~ :: :: ~ ..- 4
~:~5:::: t: ;:......"'50~ toto
::z;::: 51 b:J"
S1RfD' i 10" ~ ....t J 10" 1017 IS
PAR~'" "'" ~ ""
Ii ~ E ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~. JS;: /' . ~ 7 8 ~
. . . -~ ~ '- t 0.'. . 5 10 e
I~ 1~ ;; 1~ ~ 20 21 22 2' 2' 25 28 27 28 ~';:. ~ "
-=- I ~ CR.....AlJA ST. ~
9 10 " 12'J If ~ < ~~r.:f~ !I~ 7 ~
2 I ~ ~ ~ 10 IJOj t 1 3 1.4 \! 5 6 IS ~
~ If "'.
STREET 8 == 1 2 3 4 ;<:)6 7 8 9
J ~ 34 ! i.. ~I ~ ~ ~ ! ::~
12 13 ~~ a IVA STREET
"j! tt~!~~
9 JO Jl 32 '3 j 1 2 1lA: 5 6 7 8 9
,~
/,~ /h!J~~
.
."".12,
R
M
i i"! = T ~~l i ()~~JDr:! ~; ~ ~lilU"r--
1 12 ~ 1 2 3 , 5 6 7 8 9 1( 11 12 "" 151~] --:
14 13 33.32 31 :m.2 28 27 26 25 24 J 22 21 20 19 t~
1- "10 :5'
i ! ~:: ~ ~ !! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ nms
STREET
11
~ \Ir ~ !! H J,~(i;~ ~ ~~ !: n ~!. /1 ....;0
1 2 3 , ~ 1 2 J IT p 6 7 8~ Dg 10 r 12 " .. 1 "I J 1061 8
taf oJ J -, I ,. 1'~' & .mil' 7
8 ,\)l 5 ";', 3D 29 28 2~ 26 25 2' 23 22 21 20
I 1 17 6
i~i ~~~i~~~~H ~~~..2
CON"COOflt STREET
A
iIsJB( 2
1 2 3 I), 5
L L A
10 11 12 13 14
.. ;'"
Q i le~
1~~ f, 5 6(~16
~~.! i ~ ~ !
P
i ; J l! ! ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1 .- ,51 6f; 8' 9 10 11
I. 61 7
',IS I
t l.!:. t
"
6 9 10 "'2 " I ~ 16 17 18 20 21 22 h 2' 25 26f~7 26
(;) FLo :\I~H ~ 5 B 'f'l.
~. i Ul i i i ~ i 'j s ~ ~ I~
"..
10 11 12 13 ,.. 15 115 17 18
"
STREET ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\ ~
I H ~ e ! ~ s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ifl.-,:>'~ ~ I f:EVA a
- 4. <b I'~ , p. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:\i~
1& 17 16 19 20 22 23 2' 25 28 27 28 9 30 31 J' JJ , ". !II J , ~ ~ 7\ 6 9 10 11 ..
so <,,~
J.4 ,\. J2 31il30 29 26 27 26 25 2'J:3f/J2 ~ ,,' 5J 52"" 50 "'~' 32,,:..,
rN \pll t . 0 . ~ ~ l!) 71' ,..... 51 .., !II ... 3' Jl ;".
S!: I 2 I I ! ~ :: ::: :::: to: l"t. ~J ..,M.J. "Jt <c: 8# Ii"
,. 70 55 ~"" 35 3D!'
OAlI'[ a 21 r ~= 'I"" -- !lJ
... ~ II 1:1 "" fi!1J':J ",56.9 36 -.29 ;;,
a. ". R ; l ~ ~ ~ fl ~ . ~ & ~ /. _ 68 57 ~,... II.. JT 28 ,~
~~ B 9 10 11 HI f~ " 15 16 17 16 1. 20 ~. / 67 :~. '::: 56 <7 ~rm" 38 2i'"
....1('1
~ S9 46 "If 3g.... 26 ,il
5o",a 1/./7 60 .~ _~ .,. ..qJ.1'W25~~~
~"iI': 41 \...."1
~-.,~ ....'"' 24
53 " ,"II~ 43 _III tIn ~2 13 '''If'}
I~~~ 171:;~~~~,
RtF " ~IL -lllimJ~=.
'1Ii~
i~~~i~\!i
10 11 t2 13 14 ,
5tOE!:VA
i ~
I I
8 17 81 9
~ ~ r: !
I
12 113 ,) 15 1,. t7 I.
h i~l ~I- P ,~;
· .t..J!J. ~ j J I
-.:~~t~
20 21
rl~ \W.;J
I I :,.11'
5 :2. 2~ ,2' ~ 2'
'::IJ://D~ flf;51
! l ~ Ii ,A, ~t:-~
I~! (i! J -;M,IDR :
~ " /0'/0_'"
22 23 '4
(~
~~ i i !
',;;;;;~::;.:.::
~
a
IOn, I / f
/2~
10
IOI't. :8"
5 ~7
6 ~
a~
~
[...,-; I j ~
I, J · ai
~ i2 I ; ~
!!i
,
I 2 J
10 It 12 1
!
I ~
2 SI!lEET
! 1 ~
26 27
t
.1
...
M:r
'''''8
....0
12
.M
j:-LI) :Loo(J-
e
7"'(}UiIolO.tJI.,IN.'tf.-",
I'
~DB;
'm " 1
" I
~" ,~"
)
e
~-,
p.~
- i
,,/
/"1'
..
e
5
-a.."~
I l
I
.J;
11
'\
"\
~-,
'I
It
I
I
J . ~.
T:r'"
~~E, , .OR';E. i~ .11~'"'J
);~f # all -;, ~I ""t-.. ~I:f'" ..p\"
- h t. 7-'1'~ .I'~i
~~''', "~. 'g." t : "i,' " ;.J"n.~J J;;";;" .~
. GLEN "'...... ;",' 'AV"~ "M: !:li1~
., ,I, ..; ~,_ ".. ~ ." ~ . ";'1
'{ l~~,~"'r - .. t " l
.-11!- ! ' 'i .A' ~ -
~ ~ -,c "u,?7. "
UJ m ~ *a', " ~I/J ..II ., U ..' ,-
r, ;,. -~.' '" ;, ,
":. ~.\~;..:.) . ~ ,,:.. . , ., ,~ .-
! " V g '(7"', .r 1;< 1 ;.0""""''''7''': i ~i ,._",1
.. v.KE ,., ~:. :;;::c :I ',' P3l ~ ~
:",1, ~:\:' ~ : ~.:~ ,~~~:,_ t :, ': ~;' ,", _ !.: <;NJ"Ei"i,'li)'7::
.. I: ... G fl"EARACE VIEW .... _ '<1rf't
. ~~". \' <. ". ~"!J '~wl.;, . : . .. ,.
,,0 .13. "':q;:. -.,"'J", '" . J
'0 '~";'!!": l.t;:-; t';, ,) " " i t: ,il. i.i4~~'
I ..' " ~ ,," --" ~ J';A. cot, 21;. ~
~ " KAPOK
I .. "Y -'I ,_ . "I .
/ n "",,foIl
" ~
4'
..
GRANO VIEW
AVENUE
( VrOR I} :04
. ,..-.
,.. ,
" I
"lIl.
, ,;t! ,
II :... ~ 111$ Jt
, ,
, ;, > 0",.
u1t '4
~ ,! f'"
': ~)"!
,,> ,
MERRU
AVENUE
~. Ii
~ :';
o l:l
.~
, I' I w
...::-
OJ, .
. "",'
'~~1 f I
." ,I l~
m
"N *1
! ......
I~t~' ;;:". :..: ;;:. "
r]L . IiOYT AVENUE
',,'
<>0,1,.
I
N
'~I '
I,@ .
I' '-1'
," : '~ ~J: .1:;'1
OS/R
I I
~I
~I
~I
I
I
/
, I-
I
-,"-
r
....
"""
I
\
~,3~
, . ~
I. I
.. III" II. III 111I I
:II~! ;~~~,.,
~'I
I
...
"'~
II I
"----:-r==; ~ ~,
~~ ' .
':MHP , - ',_: 1,/ ~ ~
:.... I .m .
,~ -,' L .!.I ~
!-II.~'m
, ~ :$t~)'
:,.~.., ~- ,.~.":~..t.~.:, _- ..
...1 _ ~,.'I'lj:::;' t~;.
--
'Jf.~r
,. ''''<,1''
~;.
?X.t!
10""'''''
" ',~' r
i,~; lIT
"
.~ ~
~ '1 :j.
I
~ n .. , l'J'_' I
I!'."'~ .
. ~~~ICV~I
l .~ ;~';~
f . ".' t;
.b,.- ~~::!
~f n ~. :', :;", ~ ~ ~
w.~
,~ ' , 1'.'! ~
.. . ,I
. ., " I
-,
,w,
o~~~~,i?~~t;~?i:~)
",,~,..J
L u..~ . .. .. n .. "I:
~f,~1i~~~~ .
i'~.~ oJl;'J, ,
t~ ~' 7 1.:...1. l
u '-~';.. ; 'F~"'~
i l J ~-.
,,' JJ _c,1-
..
I
, , .
:"1'
..-.
, .
.
~I'~
.. ,
,
.
-~,
i H"'" U! !~,
I r~ ,
, , . 4 I .
....
, I
, .
~ -
~"II" l' '.. .:a"""
\". ' . ~" :!III ' I
dlJmwCb &~
c u.~ LJ..
,",
~ .~
"": ,I: r; .
I ~'J~",lf.:,
~ "':1
1"7'1" J c.
1/ fI I!~ ~. 5
~l!D,.,
. ..
! ~
*,,/'- ':0 ';}
/__~I i" .4~
;.
I ~iI" ii-I tl;
(J
~ ' i ~ '! ' i.. . ! ..' i.. . i ! 11
.... l:.. :.. ~. ~.. ij. ...
i
ST, 1
"'i .. .. .. . "'I ~
., I i
" "I ~!;!!!!i
" '"~ I ~.
i" ".," "" 'I UUHH
.... .;I..~.. ~.. :ii:!l<;... ..
'PEGRG ST, I S
1 J ,.. N' . .. . ,
. n n ,. . II 11 I
I in .
... .. i MJD i I !!...
I
i.. - . -~' .. . .. 'i ~
,., " oN :11 co .,f~1 iii!tt"
"I
,. : .. . . D .! ~ I a" a ! ; E a
'i!. I. .. i.. ..... .. i.. i. '..
SA: MATEO STREET I so
, -. I : i : i : I ~ . : i J ~1';III~I:r;liJI
1--; :
I
JOSE
j)
~l€l~arwater
o~
PREPARED BY
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING I GIS
100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph.: (727)562-4750, Fax: (727)526-4755
www.clearwater-fl.com
S
Disd8imer:
Public JnfOl1Tl8tJon data.ls 'lrrished by 1/16 Cityo' CIeaIWd1er
Public Works AdmiIiStIatJ~ngJn86rlng, and must be BCC:6ptud
MId used by thel'9CjJi6nt WIth the undf1f51anding that the dal.9
l'9C6iVed was coII8ctsd fOf the PUIp06f1 0' dev9lop1nfJ a graphic
JnlrMtnJcturelnv9nlOf)'. As such, hi CIy r:i Clearwater PWAIE
mak9S no ws"V'ti9S, 81qNSSS8d or ,""lied. COfIC1emi'9 the
ao;:untcy. coopelene5s, reli8blNty, Of suitability of this data fOf any
oth8f parliaJlar usa. Furthermore, the City 0' Clearwal8f PWA/E
&S5Uf1'186 no liability M1aD09Wf assodaled with the US6 Of misuSIJ
ofsuchd!lt"
..
!
"~i'
~ 20 ~
t.. .. ClI
.. ..... N
;illllll W~E ~
Ih s
F
~
~"
t ,I..
.... g Ii..
,i ,
BERNAOONG
STREET
, "'"
. -..
.. !
I~: .1 ~1\ (11 U :0 >
""'TEO ST.
~,
I"
~,5 ..
'.~~, b"
, ....
'" J' !
,
1 ~ !t
..,2 !
~ g> Ii:
..,;; ..
THOUAS ROAD
, ..
.
~ 05J1
I'
. :, :,:I1lp;:- 'i
Ilj;: .,.i
, LMD~ 5,!'0A0
,""'" ro.' .rr
~, 1'9"
~ 1-1" Co . D Q
. .
~-I:','
n."
," I
I~
OS/R
~
i .-....~
t
.. i i t
i~;i\..
; l t ~
.......... BORDEAUX
'" .."
, .
'''''
i.~~
J1~ \.,"","""" c.,~
---a;o , "" .. .
.. ,
J1 ~ \0,..... '!
,-''',,''', .L'n4e
~11(1 J", ~ i
_ 1 6 ~ :!~!~ d ~~ < 1';:.\:,
1. .-.
~;#."
,/
5 i..
i ,~ ! ~ r
.., -M fJ -.:.. ., ..
, : : ; . ~I:
... '* !Co Go . i' j
. , .
&. 'i. ""
CH.IMBlfE
~ ~ ... .
! ~ ; :!: ..
.. #
.
. '
"i ;
" "3
f'O
H'
." "'~ ~; ,.~. ~ :'fi" " .'f IJ lJ "J I: i .J
-\, '''", I... - ",' ~
,J~;" '.
" : : : I ; I' - ~. ,~.. -.~' : "t: ':""~" "'
:~.' ~~~-:; "~ill':<i~! ~..,,~,~-.~~ ':: -
I · ,.. ~..., l' ~~~,. '......
!!,. i" i " i It i " I U ~ "I' " '" --::mJ3!' ;t '=--
II. to n.~' 1.I .;,~. ~'- r.Ma)CNALODN,. .
':::.oil
PITmUI~'
:;:: ~\ :. ~ ..1...
"1 :L: \ .... \ ': ~ -..
I -. - ~ i- ;U"-:' : ~
_II U1 ..~- .. // ....1~.J.
.. ::~"'~WllllI'II(~~-' ." '~ ~;~.)2. row;' 1
EA '> b4 Of I HH2 . ". ==
[J ....., .'1.' i ~ I 'f,' :E t:
. . . -. ::~, -+- ~ .
J~.;~ -~ I:;:'~ ~ -.
.~~~ t -1I'1,I'.iJJ .. l1-
. ---,-..-. If
. C", . .
'~ 11 ,Uf
.,~ IV~
II i~~f.
...,;1 "
'OU i\i>l\
~~.~
~..il:~~ :.:~~
:\fd ~;~~ I,
J
".
.! ~
.
..
- -,...,,1"--
~
'''43
'11..
f'
,l;,~
=. tZl
R1i "0 i: 'I:~I:
;';"" ". ~J...-:1. I.
,M":-. ':'''\ " !ol'~" lim'!:l. I.
,~w.l: :: L: =1 (:')
~I~" --..".::'
- ~'rMDR ..
- u.'-.' .. '" ..
>>flU .= In,.
~ .... '"
= '" ..
'"
..:' : ~t1~1
AI
.~ : +: ~ill
......:::::::::
=/ _T
... ..
... ~~
- /
, ~:I.,j~
maT
'"
...
...
...
.,
, I
j" I."
...... II IOU
/~~..--:--
y ~,
1
ill -
'a
'H
11"'1
Jlty ;': ~\~
,.,
i
.......- ,
._____.___._.__._. 0_____0_'_'_'--
-' -~'\'\\- nl
,.,. ",...' .
I -V~ 'I ftj
, ,- f I
-. - I
-
QlU.TO..,..-
I'
"ATI~1fX1'Y
...
-. ,.I:~
n
.....
,(:
SF
RESIDENTIAl. DISTRICTS
I.DA -lowo..Ny ~Ial
lMDR . Low MelIum 0ereIly RnldwI,iIll
lrdOR .~Oendy~
tr,lHLfl .Md.JmHlgho.n.ty~lal
HOR . ~ Oendy~1Ial
Ir,lHp .t.IobIe!--lotMP.rtr;
CfNXlO. eo.ctman Ridge NIl~eon-vllllon
.......""'''''
IENCOO .IIiIndEsw.NeIgttlorfK.oodConllWVlIllon
"'-"""'"
CClf.IUERClAL OlSTRICTS
G......
T .TOl.IItIm
C.~
D.D:Mnlowm
SPECIAL. USE DISTRICTS
1RT.1ndutlr-W,~ardl"'dTeet\nology
!."-!11l1Ulonal
OO'R.ep.n~""lonal
P.Pr_lonArfll.
o
City Owned Property
Agreement to Annex
Annexation 0 Deannexation
Correction
<>
Rezoning
Gnu]
Q
G)
8
SUB NUMBER I' - Refer 10 Pial)
BLOCK NUMBER
SUB PARCEL NUMBER
PARCEL NUMBER (M&B)
'"''
<'-'-Jo
LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP)
____ PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
I
CD
@
STATE HIGHWAY
COUNTY HIGHWAY
o
U.S. HIGHWAY
Zoning Atlas
ENGINEERING I GII
100 e. Myrtle AVI. ClIIlW8llr, jrL 33758
Ph.: (727)512-47110, Fa: (727)521-4755
_.cIlItWltaMl.com
\
_I
--
fIIuJ:IlG""'''''" .1umI.w by"- Ofyd CNww
~WorlIIAdnW~"'onI~ wlPKlll...M11>>PfH
II'Id IIMI~"''''''''' '"" UNi urtdnt~ 1Mt... daM
~"'fIIIIIII*d"""'putpaHddlWkJpiltg.""(J
~rwMtxy,AI"'''' ~do...c..flWNI.
"...""....".,..."~(JIIfrJJI~~,,,.
~~-='::,~~~_..,..::'"
~ ~J8IIIy~.....-dd'l "'''01''''''
H
w~e _ ~
.
....
...
_ClOT"""
~ . "'"" DINIr"-*'U
.....,.. ...........~~
::. :=:=-:::;::.,...
1CJlII.""DinI)'~
..... . ..... HcrN I'ItII
CN<<XlD- CoIlIIlNn 1IIIlto-,...,.....~
Il!NCOO ,==_---
.....-.
CCIOMIOCW. "'""""'"
0._
T . TcuIIm
c:.c:omn.wa~
0._
-.cw. uta DllTIU:TS
RT............~....TWw/JtJItt
,.--
OM-..o,.,~t1
,..~....,.,.
. City Owned Property
. Agreement to Annex
.J Annexation ~ Deannexation
. Correction 0 Rezoning
G- ]
o
G)
e
eUBMJ_R("~toPlot)
BLOCK NUMII.I!R
'UB PARCEL NUMBeR
PARCl!I. NUMIlIiR (10111I)
c
'---;..
LANO HOOK (lXlMMON OIWERSHp)
----
Pl.ATTEO 8UBOIV1SIQN BOUNDARY
CD
€l
o
COUNTY H10fMIAY
STATE HIOHWAY
UA HIOHWAV
Zoning Atlas
Feb 06. 2004
NW 1/4 o( 16-29.16
292A
Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 1629 16 199260000010
e _
Page 20f3
16 / 29 / 16 / 19926 / 000 / 0010
Z3-Feb-Z004 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:51:07
Ownership InforMation Residential Property Address. Use. and Sales
DABIRI. HASSOUD
DABIRI. HALOUSE
30Z4 HAUERFORD DR
CL EARWATER FL 33761-40Z3
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 117 N HCHU LL EN BOOTH RD
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Tract: Zli8.09
sales froM 2001 - 2002:
315.500 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac / IMP
Plat InforMation 7 /Z.OOI 11. 493/1. 11 0 337.500 <Q) I
1950 : Book OZ8 Pgs 001- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 < )
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: Z77.IOO HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: Z77.IOO Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t: 0
Taxable: Z77.IOO Agricultural: 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearlllater View:
03 Millage: Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Fron t x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: Ii. 396.88
1) ZZO x 13Z 9. Z5 Z9. 060.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
6.396.88 6) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: Z68.805
2003 taxes will be :
6.396.88
Short Legal CRYSTA L H EIGHTS SUB LOTS I AND Z
Description
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbinfcgi -scr3 ?0=1 &a= 1 &r=&s=1 &u=O&p= 16+29+ 16+ 19926+... 2/23/2004
~ t III ~~t rv\ !) If i I) BoatfJ
CLEARWATER, CITY OF . CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748 PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
HARMSEN, GERTRUDE
3155 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
SOFARELLI, ANDREA D
3137 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
CHILDERS, CHERYL A
PO BOX 730
SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 -
P ASSARIS, ELEFTHERIOS
P ASSARIS, MARIA
3106 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
BECK, ELIZABETH S
3124 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
COPELAND, DANIEL G
COPELAND, TONY A K
3142 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
EGAN, EUGENEF
3145 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
COCHRANE, EDW ARD R
COCHRANE, RUTH D
3127 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
EAKER, HELEN L
3109 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 3702
CLARK, THOMAS B
3149 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
SMITH, ERIC 0
SMITH, COLLEEN P
3131 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
BELCHER, H STEVEN
1504 JAN ANN CT
WASHINGTON IN 47501 - 3746
ACCETI A, JOHN J
ACCETI A, ALLATHAI
11770 BARB CT
LARGO FL 33778 - 3803
JENSEN, ROBERT C
3130 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
PORTSMOUTH, THOMAS E
GOMEZ, VICTORIA R
3148 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
HODGES, RAY
HODGES, SHARON K
3139 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
SWANBERG, SCOTI D
TRISKA, LORI M
3121 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
F,D200.3- (1061
"'-'1v10HR, DOLORES L
3161 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
REESE, DONNA L
3143 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
PLEINES, HOWARD
3125 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
MAl, NGA THANH
DOAN, TONYLE
3107 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 -
GRADY, JOSEPH F JR
GRADY,KIMN
3118 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
RO, MYONG-HUI
3136 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
ZEIGLER, PATRICIA F
3154 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
LOSONCZY, STEPHEN R
LOSONCZY, IRENE D
3133 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
KELLY, MICHAEL S
KELLY, LINDA K
3115 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 3702
LOUNTZIS, FOTIOS LAMOUREUX, ERNEST A
LOUNTZIS, SPYRIDOULA LAMOUREUX, CHERYL D
24-31 157TH ST 3111 BAY LN
WHITESTONE QUEENS Nl-- l.lC~RW ATER FL 33759 - 4402
11357 - 3744 r I I::
!
~.
DAMIANAKIS, ANTHONY R
DAMIANAKIS, EKATERINI
111 MC MULLEN BOOTH RD
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 -
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CL WTR
D/B/A CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH
331 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002
CLINE, EHREN M
3116 BAY LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401
'.
KELLY, THOMAS
107 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4450
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CL WT
D/B/A CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH
331 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002
MURRAY, LA VONNE
3124 BAY LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401
'-CALVARY OPEN BIBLE
CHURCH
11 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4419
DABIRI, MAS SaUD
DABIRI, MALOUSE
3024 HA VERFORD DR
CLEARWATER FL 33761 -
TIZON, VELMA W
3129 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710
SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER A WHITNEY, JENNIFER L COMER, LONNIE B
3133 DREW ST WHITNEY, GABRIEL C C/O SWEZEY, TIM
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 3710 3137 DREW ST 3137 BAY LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402
NOLL, DAN L WALSH, EDWARD J AARTS, FRED S JR
3133 BAY LN WALSH, LORRAINE E AARTS, HELEN M
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 3121 BAYLN 3141 DREW ST
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4402 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710
JOHNSON, MARGARET S ALBRECHT, CHRISTIAN D CURRY, TONJA
EARNHARDT, LETTIE M ALBRECHT, CAROL F 116 K ST
3144 BAY LN 112 K ST CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409
'":LEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4401 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409
)NNOLLY, MATTHEW J ROTELLA, THOMAS R D'AMICO, FRANK A JR
!O K ST ROTELLA, CYNTHIA L D'AMICO, JOHaNNA H
~LEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4409 124 K ST 3100 FEA THERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
THOMSON, MARION KACZOR, JERZY GOSNELL, JAN T
3106 FEATHERWOOD CT KACZOR, ALICJA 3118 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4412 3112 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
WELCH, KA Y L HARDER, STEF ANIE J DE BUSSCHERE, STEVEN A
3124 FEATHERWOOD CT 3130 FEATHERWOOD CT 3136 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
BHAME, WILLIAM E
BHAME, KATHY L
3142 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
TULLY, JOE
TULLY, CYNTHIA L
3148 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
COLGAN, CATHERINE
SEYLER, MARTHA J
41 ELLEN DR
ROCKAWAY NJ 07866 -
,.,
EZELL, WILLIAM J
EZELL, DEBORAH A
3149 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
HARBERSON, VICTOR G
3131 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
SALIM, THEODORE N
SALIM, AMAL G
3113 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc
101 Philippe Pkwy, Suite 205
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
tt
HALIM, SIMAN B
3141 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
FRANKICH, PETER N
3125 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
KOWBEL, GREGORY A
KOWBEL, WANDA J
3107 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 -
Harbour Towne Condominium
Association
Joan Hennly, LCAM
350 Bayshore Blvd.
Clearwater, FL 33759
. PERFEITO, ANTHONY
PERFEITO, ANA
3137 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
BAILEY, MONTIE R JR
3119 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
GRIZZLE, ANTHONY D
3101 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER l"'--I
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARIa I ( ~
The Community Development Board of the CIty of Clearwater, Flonda, WIll hold pubhc hearmgs on Tuesday, Ma~
2004, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!. Those cases
that are not contested bv the applicant, staff, neil!hborinl! property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent al!enda
and approved bv a sinl!le vote at the bel!inninl! of the meetinl!.
1. (cont. from 12/16/03) Michael & Stefanie Markham are requesting an appeal of the decision ofa Level One (Flexible
Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10 feet for a two-story
addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B
(FLS2003-08038). (Proposed Use: A 1,528 square-foot, two-story addition, including a third car garage (with a driveway
extension) in association with an existing single-family dwelling) (Owners: Jeffrey and Ambryn Finstad) at 2959 Eal!le
Estates Cir. W., Eagle Estates, Lot 38. APP2003-00003
2. Top Flil!ht Enterprises, Inc & 1925 Edl!ewater Drive, Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a
reduction in the side (east) setback on 81:lnnydale Drive from 10 feet to 5.85 feet (to pavement) and, an increase of building
height from 35 feet to 75 feet from base flood elevation of 13 feet MSL (with height calculated to the midpoint of the roof
slope) to construct 77 multi-family residential (attached) units, under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. (Proposed Use:
Attached multi-family residential units) at 1919 & 1925 Edl!ewater Dr. & 1010. 1012 & 1020 Sunset Point Rd.,
Sunnydale Sub, Lots 1,2 and W 34 ft of Lot 3; Sunset Point and Replat Lots 2 & 3; Blk A, the E 3 ft of Lot 4, Lot 5,6,7,
together with the W 15 ft of Lot 8. FLD2003-09050
3. Massoud & Malouse Dabiri are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the number of parking spaces
from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side
setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill
Development under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. (Proposed Use: Office building) at 117 McMullen Booth Rd.,
Crystal Heights Sub, Lots 1 & 2. FLD2003-11061
4. Belle Aqua Villas, LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions
of Section 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for six slips totaling 720 square feet, with each dock measuring 60 feet in
length from the seawall, in conjunction with a six-unit townhome development) at 125 Bril!htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.
2, Lots 7 & 8. FLD2003-11062
5. Belle Aqua Villas. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions
of Section 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for six slips totaling 720 square feet, with each dock measuring 60 feet in
length from the seawall, in conjunction with a six-unit townhome development) at 116 & 120 Bril!htwater Dr., Bayside
Sub. No.2, Lots 53 & 54. FLD2003-11063
6. ENTA Investments. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the expansion of a medical clinic
with reductions to the front (east along South Fort Harrison Avenue) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing building),
from 25 feet to three feet (to existing pavement) and from 25 feet to 15 feet (to proposed pavement), reductions to the front
(north along "B" Street) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing building) and from 25 feet to seven feet (to proposed
dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the front (south along "C" Street) from 25 feet to two feet (to existing pavement) and
reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to existing building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing
pavement) and from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-704.C, and to permit reductions to the landscape buffer along the front (east along South Fort
Harrison Avenue) property line from 15 feet to 10 feet (to existing building) and from 15 feet to three feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the front (north along "B" Street) from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing
building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the front (south along "C" Street) from 10 feet to two feet (to existing
pavement) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line from five feet to zero feet (to existing
pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G (Proposed Use:
Expansion of an existing 3,096 square-foot medical clinic through the renovation of an existing 2,357 square-foot building
for administrative purposes) at 1320 Ft. Harrison Ave., Belleair, Elk 24, Lot 1-2 & vac alley on W, Lots 3,4 & 5 & E 1/2
ofvac alley. FLD2003-12066
.
.
7. Ilhan Bill!utav (Pat Sheppard) is requesting a flexible development approval to permit construction of 2 medical clinic
offices with building A totaling 7,985 sq ft and building B totaling 8,488 sq ft along with reductions to the front (southeast)
setback along Lakeview Rd froni 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and
the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) under the provision of Section 2-1004.C. (Proposed Use: 2 medical
clinic offices totaling 16,473 sq ft) at 720 Lakeview Rd., Sec. 21-29-15, M&B 14.21. FLD2003-12067
8; Marlee A. Winner is requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction to lot size from 5,000 sq ft to
4,040 sq ft, a reduction in the side (south) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the front
(west) setback to 3 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the side (north) setback to .9 ft (to building) and
zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the rear (east) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in
required parking from 15 spaces per 1,000 sq ft to zero for a restaurant and to permit 3 dwelling units above as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Restaurant and 3
residential units) at 395 Mandalav Ave., Barbour-Morrow Sub., Blk A, par t of Lot 21 & all of Lot 22. FLD2003-12070
9. Valhalla Properties / John Rich are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a medical clinic with
reductions to parking from 42 spaces to 29 spaces, a reduction of the front setback from 25 feet to 17 feet (to building), a
reduction in the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to the dumpster enclosure), a reduction in the side (north)
setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), and a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 14 feet (to pavement) as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204, and a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the east property line (no continuous hedge along property perimeter provided), as part of a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Change of use from an existing 8,072
square foot social center building to a medical clinic) at 407 N. Belcher Rd., Sec. 07-29-16, M&B 33.11. FLD2004-02007
10. Josee Goudreault is requesting an appeal of a Level One application (Flexible Standard Development case FLS2003-
12066) that requires the building be repainted a neutral color, under the provisions of Section 4-501. (Proposed Use: An
existing building that has been painted light purple [main portion of the exterior of a building] and dark purple [base of the
building and trim]) at 24 N. Ft. Harrison Ave., Earl & Tate's Sub., N 43 ft of Lots 12 & 13. APP2004-00001
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning
Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with
respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall
be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to:
personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on
reconsideration requests.
An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be
recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to
three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount
of time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by
interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department,
100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to
discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
.
.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQillRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 02129/04
II'
.
.
j
\
Diane and Peter Frankic
3125 Featherwood Ct.
Clearwater, FL 33759
To: Planning Director and City Clerk
From: Neighboring property owner
March 16, 2004
I object to the request of a flexible development approval for the proposed office building at 117
McMullen Booth Road.
Section 2-1001 states that the intent and purpose of the Office District is to provide the citizens of
Clearwater access to services WITHOUT adversely affecting the integrity of the residential
neighborhoods or diminishing the scenic quality of the City of Clearwater.
Please keep in mind when you make your decision that more than 100 homes would have a view of a
39.5ft office building instead of trees if the request is approved. The east side of McMullen Booth is
ENTIREL Y residential in this area or the offices remain in the original buildings. A building of this
proposed size is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Furthermore, allowing one
structure of this size in the neighborhood will set precedence for future flexible development.
Section 2-1004 states that permitted uses are subject to the criteria set out in this section. For the
Board to approve the request, the Flexibility Criteria must be met.
1. The development is otherwise impractical without the deviations. -The owners already have
an approved plan that is practical.
2. The development will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. -The property
next door would be looking at a wire fence and a 39.5ft building would block out all of the
afternoon sun. Traffic would now be traveling all day on what was once a quiet street.
o . '. . r' t one use of Ice i the c' c
eXl
4. The uses are compatible with adjacent land use. -A one or two story office building, with
plenty of landscaping would be more compatible in this very green residential area that has a
lot of trees. The reduction of the setbacks to 10 feet would not allow for the preservation of the
DOZENS of oaks that now grow on the property.
5. Suitable sites are not otherwise available within the City of Clearwater. -I'm sure in this city
there are plenty of other sites that are suitable.
6. The project will upgrade the immediate vicinity. - Homes within 500 feet of 117 McMullen
Booth Road are worth up to 225,000 dollars at this time. Several studies that I have found
conclude that development of commercial property in a residential area has a NEGATIVE
impact on house prices of homes within 1000 feet.
7. The design creates a form and function which enhances community character of the immediate
vicinity. -The area is residential with single-family homes and many trees. A building of this
size would not blend in with the community.
8. Flexibility of lot-width, setbacks, height and parking. -These requests are not justified by one
benefit to the community character. Dozens of oaks would have to be removed and the height
of the building would make it the predominant landscape feature for the entire neighborhood.
'"
.
e
~
\.
9. Adequate off-street parking. -There is no room on any adjacent street for on-street parking.
The only street with a sidewalk that is adjacent is McMullen Booth. So the request for a
reduction in parking spaces would not be appropriate.
Respectfully,
~~
Diane and Peter Frankie
-;:,~ Eb~
-- ..
r/14Aiw.~
e,; !Y~~T~-l'-~-f'l\i1i n~"('C, .
u"I'_u;; _..'J'~--S7:"'1 ~ '
, :,'", J I.
; ~ i I MAl? f 1 ':OOl' ".. III !,.',;
...1I, ~,
; ,ll'
- '. _... (i
, " " - (".~ ",t'-.,,: .1
~-.~ '" " .: ~-' "
'........,'~ ..,,~..~ I
,..... ., -~MARCH 15, 2004
TO:
CYNTHIA E. GOUDEAU, CMC
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748
FROM:
EDWARD J. WALSH
3121 BAY LANE
CLEARWATER, FL 33759-4402
DEAR MS. GOUDEAU,
IN REGARDS TO MASSOUD & MALOUSE DABIRI'S REQUEST FOR A FLEXIBILE DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL AT 117 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD., CRYSTAL HEIGHTS SUB. LOTS 1 & 2 FLD2003-11061.
I WOULD LIKE TO STRONGLY OBJECT TO HAVING A BUILDING HEIGHT INCREASE TO 39.5 FEET
AS I LIVE APPROXIMATELY 125 FEET FROM SAID PROPERTY AND FEEL THAT THIS BEING A
RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD NOT BLEND IN WITH THE HOMES ON OUR STREET AND
WOULD BE OUT OF PLACE AND MUCH TOO HIGH, ALSO MOVING THE FRONT SETBACKS
[NORTH AND SOUTH] FROM 25 FEET TO 10 FEET TO PAVEMENT AND REDUCING THE SIDE
SETBACK FROM 20 TO 10[ TO PAVEMENT] WOULD TAKE AWAY FROM THE GREEN
ENVIRONMENT THAT IS NEEDED FOR SUCH THINGS AS WATER RUNOFF AND WATER
PERCULATION, IN PLAIN LANGUAGE, TOO BIG OF BUILDING IN TOO SMALL OF A SPACE AND
TOO MUCH ASPHALT. I BELIEVE THAT WHEN WE GET TO THE SUMMER RAINFALL OUR RUNOFF
SWALES WILL BE OVERFOWING AND SATURATED, CREATING PROBLEMS SUCH AS
MOSQUITOS. ALSO I ENVISION WORKERS TO THIS BUILDING AND CUSTOMERS TO THIS
BUILDING TAKING A SHORT CUT FROM BAYSHORE DR WILL BE COMING UP OUR STREET, BAY
LANE DR. TO MCMULLEN BOOTH RD AND RIGHT TURNING AT DREW ST AND RIGHT TURNING
ONTO SAID PROPERTY TO AVOID WEST BOUND TRAFFIC ON DREW TO AVOID WAITING FOR
THE LIGHT TO CHANGE ON MCMULLEN BOOTH RD, WE DO HAVE SMALL CHILDREN ON THIS
BLOCK THAT WILL BE IN HARM'S WAY.
THANK YOU FOR HAVING THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS MY CONCERNS:
EDWARD WALSH
'E~W4f
f .-
,..
"
,
e
~.""_.~"."-->-~--':'''~,' e
,:?' (ru I' C l'l rlj7 \1; I f"\ '
:, I ~ ,!D !-~_,-.lL~l. 'Ill
;';,! MA~: 1 100/, lw:
... L:l J J
-" f": \.J.... ~..~ -'
~'. " U 'J ',_~...J i
,
Ehren Cline
3116 Bay Lane
Clearwater, FL. 33759
March 12,2004
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC.
Lisa Fierce, Planning Department.
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
R.E.: FLD2003-11061.
Dear Ms. Goudeau / Fierce;
This letter is in response to the Public Hearing Notice concerning case #: FLD2003-
11061, in which Massoud & Malouse Dabiri are requesting flexible development
approval.
I am stating my obiection to all of the proposed flexible development requests as outlined
below.
1. To begin, I obiect to the propOsed increase in side setbacks (east and west) from
20 feet to 10 feet. My residence is the single family home, (3116 Bay Lane),
located on the parcel of property immediately to the east of the proposed
development site, (117 McMullen Booth Road), mentioned in this notice. My
residence currently sits 10.5 feet from the adjoining east property line of the
proposed development site.
I am quite certain that an increase in side (east and west) setbacks from 20 feet
to 1 0 feet will have a profound impact on the living conditions of my residence.
One the obvious problems will be noise from car doors opening and slamming
shut as well as the distraction of headlight glare from cars or even delivery trucks
beaming through the very insufficient proposed 6 foot privacy fence into the two
bedroom windows that face the proposed parking lot, early in the morning or even
late in the evening. I can't imagine my baby, son or daughter being disturbed
every morning by these noises just because a land developer wanted to increase
his profit margin and overdevelop this modestly sized piece of property.
2. I obiect to the proposed increase in building height from 30 feet to 39.5 feet. I
have great concerns of an intrusion of privacy as well as the building itself just
being a general eye sore to surrounding neighbors. I have discussed this matter
with all of my immediate neighbors on Bay Lane and we are all in consensus that
the proposed building height of39.5 feet does not and will not be in harmony with
the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties. Nor is
it consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity as so
incorrectly stated in the "City of Clearwater Planning Department Staff Report"
regarding this case. A building that remained within the currently allowed
Page 1 of 4
~.
r
e
e
building height limit of30.0feet would be much less intrusive and have a much
lower impact to the surrounding area.
It does not matter to me how appealing the building may be from an architectural
aspect, I still do not want to see it from my back yard or from my front yard for
that matter nor do my neighbors as I am sure you will find. There are NO other
like or similar buildings of this nature or size anywhere in the immediate vicinity.
This height of building simply does not fit into our neighborhood and adding it
would certainly destroy our property values as well as perspective resale value.
This is a neighbor hood completely made up of single family homes with
convenient access to the East West Recreation Trail as well as a community park
and baseball diamonds and soccer fields. A newly constructed church will also be
erected very shortly directly across the street from the proposed development site.
This Church is more conducive to a family orientated neighborhood then the
proposed office building. This is truly not an area that would support or warrant
an office building of this size or nature. I cannot emphasize enough how much we
oppose this height increase.
3. I obiect to the proposed increase in front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet
to 10 feet. This increase in setbacks will only add to the obtrusive nature of this
proposed office building and it's negative impact on our (the property owners)
neighborhood. The reasons for my objection on this issue is inspired by the fact
that the parking lot will simply be too big and collect too much additional rain
water which will only add to the existing issues with flooding that we experience
every year during the rainy summer months. Keeping these current 25 foot set
backs in place will only help to preserve the appearance and quality of living of
the immediate and surrounding area.
4. I also obiect to the request to reduce the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32.
This variance is simply an effort to reduce one of the city's requirements to have
34 spaces to support a structure of this size. The request to reduce these parking
spaces is simply another effort to maximize the potential size of this office
building to accommodate more rental space. This request just re-emphasizes the
fact that the design of this project is purely for capital gain, and that there are no
considerations being made what so ever regarding the impact to the surrounding
area or to the residents that live within it.
I would now like to state some concerns that I have pertaining to the proposed
construction that were discussed in a meeting at the Municipal Services Building.
Attendees at the meeting were; Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, Ehren Cline, Ernie Cline,
Lorrie Cline, Ed & Lorraine Walsh. Meeting took place on 3-13-04 at 11 :OOam, room
210.
1. 6 foot privacy fence along the east property line:
Page 2 of 4
.....
,..
e
e
· The proposed 6 foot wooden screen fence is, and will be, a very insufficient
barrier for noise reduction as well as failing to be a sufficient physical barrier.
Vehicles that occupy the parking spaces facing this fence will be continually
shining their headlights directly through this screen fence and directly onto my
house and into my two (2) bedroom windows that face the projects east property
line at a mere 10 feet away. I would suggest a more substantial type of privacy
barrier. Specifically a concrete block wall at least 8 feet in height. Another
suggestion would be to push the privacy wall back an additionall0feet (west)
where the elevation is approximately 3 feet higher then my adjacent property.
This would affectively allow the barrier to gain approx. 3 feet in height thereby
increasing the privacy walls effectiveness. This is assuming that the barrier is an
8foot concrete wall. A 6 foot wooden screen fence would not be sufficient at any
elevation. My reasoning for my objection on this matter, are as follows. My house
and yard are elevated approximately 4 feet above grade (approx grade elevation is
30.6 feet) to accommodate an above ground septic tank that is required due to the
poor percolation properties of the surrounding soil. Therefore, with the current
proposed construction design, while standing in my back yard I will only
effectively have a 2 foot privacy barrier once the differences in elevations are
considered. This will simply not be acceptable as a privacy barrier.
2. Water Run off and Drainage System Location:
· There is also an issue with the drainage system that is being proposed. Water that
is collected from the underground holding tank is to be channeled through a swale
that runs along the south property line and then drains into another drainage
system that will eventually dump into the swale at the most North East comer of
the property. This will be dumping directly into the swale that runs along the
North property line of my residence. This swale currently floods and overflows
into my property every time we get a heavy rainfall which is almost every day in
the summer. This is most likely due to the poor percolation properties of the
surrounding soil in conjunction with the fact that there is NO existing sewer
system for storm water currently in place to handle this volume of water. This will
cause a larger issue for me as well as other residences that live along Drew Street,
with flooding when the extra rain water run off is introduced from the proposed
office parking lot into our already insufficient drainage system. The dilapidated
and makeshift culverts and swales that currently exist along Drew Street are not
sufficient enough to handle the current volume of water that flows through them
now. This construction will have an even greater impact on this already present
flooding issue.
3. Sanitary Sewer connection and location:
· The current plans show the proposed sanitary sewer coming from a northern
location that will be directionally bored, approximately 263 linear feet away.
There is a much more feasible Sanitary Sewer at the intersection of K Street and
Bay Lane, just down the road from the proposed construction site. This sewer
Page 3 of 4
. .
.
<-
if
e
e
,
could be made readily available with less effort and most likely by spending less
money to do so. The City of Clearwater's long range plan is to annex the
remainder of the properties on both sides of Bay Lane and on the South side of
Drew Street, into the City of Clearwater. This information is available and shown
on the on-line zoning documents made available by the City of Clearwater. If the
city is planning to annex these properties anyway, why would there not be an
effort now to complete at least that phase of the process by extending the sanitary
sewer from the intersection of K Street and Bay Lane to the West end of Bay
Lane? This would seem to be more cost effective and also more appealing to the
surrounding neighborhood and it residents. At least you could then say that the
surrounding area and its residents were benefiting in some way form this
proposed office building construction and not only one person.
4. Dumpster location and use:
· The location of the dumpster is extremely close to my adjoining property line and
residence. I have very serious concerns dealing with the noise generated from the
large heavy machinery type trucks that come to empty these types of dumpsters.
They are very loud and obtrusive at any time of day. This will definitely cause a
form of noise pollution being so close to the adjoining property. There is also the
issue of attracting wildlife such as raccoons, rats and other potentially dangerous
wildlife that could harm a child playing in the adjoining property's yard. Please
have this area redesigned to locate the dumpster and dumpster pad in a more non
intrusive location. Possibly somewhere closer to the loading zone or closer to the
building itself.
I would now like to thank you for taking the time to hear my concerns. Although there
were many, they are all with valid concern and warrant as I will be the party most
affected by any and all proposed construction to this parcel of land. Thank you again for
your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
~~
Ehren Cline.
Page 4 of 4
-;t;
.
.
e "L-.--- ~-_.
, OJ lE (10 Itll W [ U'
~ U I
~. .. ...... Cn."'.,.,'CU:."-li I\lh! cd
~~~~70-:d'~
C-~ Jo/~Af;(J~D~
~ a-.~
aT / / /' /f(/t2~ P ~ !Pc1.
~ ~.. I/.~ SJ. LtJ19 /x/1 FL0{1(J(J3-/(Ot,J
J/ (i~ 21 ~ 3f/J !JIJ</n Afl.;1fE.
~70 z:i.P- ~ . S cLI~ ""
~)c~6i/7Ar ~ ~J'Pc.JLi/tTcJ./o~
T;;/~
..s:d ak ~ 7d 3~ -9. '
A/ c.9 D F<fLif To 10 r.j /tJ~~
'7J ~~ ~ TCJ . ' ' .
~.70 Jr,s-r~ t:2-4 ~C~
Wb . '~?:-k~
:t5~ :J-laoyB,
, ~~~~~~;?~~
a4 ~~
. ~72' . Q~.~.
41~~~~~-~;Z ,.
~p~cL-~~~#
~.~ ~ I
Z; ~~cI~
.
~ y.v~h" a.. t:. etJ v dea..LL l.~<'is c.. _ .';1
U j ~ erg [e n \YJ ~ I ~ 11
, rU!II~-;20011 1 U . < /J . I
,u I --CJ~
. ~"-,.',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,........~_...~._..._~,,-.,.--
_' .>~:',,",~U\:,;.~::. ,nl ,i)':':\/t:'L()P~\.'JE\JT svCti
(":::, {'\.:'" c,,:,':: 'Ci.t:/\FiVVf\TER
; -,-'.-. '..';'::- '_'-'-. ......-'---<--o.;.~. '!
/~~
,~~!, c:_'
.
.
v/
-4~ 'f/:
~ 4I24/MrJ-d~/ c;y k~.~
/JL~-~Iff~ ~~. ~
s~ ~ 3d. ~I ' := t:;:-
~(~ Y-~/
CU-:L <f-.ir~J~ R0-~ ~
/e)~(io )/~,z
~~~~.z:oj<-d
~ /CJ C~ . .)/ + d-
. ~. ~~SC1-5--
.
~ . ~
/~~
~2'-ltJcJdQ
.a;C //7Jn~ ~kcL
/~~ / ~ / <j- ,;z.(FL D:Z - II c:J6tJ
CJ~~~. ~~
~ /' t:U. tf///
~ ~ ({)~ / ~ ?
~d' ~tU-~~
.3~ ~."~ -f: '. --~ ~
.....,..../ '~v '., dL_/
l//(.;~7- ~ a.- u7" ~
~-d~I~~
.
..
~"
e
e
. .
w_'
.'
.
.
..
.
7q7-~03%
e
e
....'
Lorrie Cline
3116 Bay Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
Ms. Cynthia E. Goudeau
CMC, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
PO Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
March 13, 2004
",---f['W-/T.' Oliil...... 2--""::.:
U ;~ l'J [}; rln
JUl., M~:,:_~,,:~JwJl
".. .!.:. , """",.: (,'V('" f
....':.~::::E:,~2@j~:~:j
Re: Case # FLD2003-11061
Dear Ms. Goudeau,
I am writing this letter in response to the notice of Community Development
Board Public Hearing scheduled for Tuesday March 16, 2004 at 2:00 PM in the
City Commission Chambers. Please consider this my formal objection to all of
the variances proposed in the City of Clearwater notice received via U.S. Postal
Service. These objections being:
1. I object to the request for a flexible development approval to reduce
the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces;
2. I object to the request to reduce the front setbacks (north and south)
from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement);
3. I object to the request to reduce the side setback from 20 to 10 feet
(to pavement), and;
4. I object to the request to increase the building height to 39.5 feet.
I am planning to attend this meeting but also wanted to register my objections in
writing prior to the meeting. I am the immediate neighbor to the east of Mr.
Dabiri's property on 117 McMullen Booth Road. My house borders his property
and will be the most affected by the variances that he is proposing. As this
property stands now, and has for over two years, overgrown and dilapidated,
anything will be an improvement. However, as the immediate neighbor, the
changes that the Dabiri's are proposing are not acceptable, nor appropriate for
this area.
Although this property has been previously zoned for office use, there are
currently no buildings in the area of the magnitude that is being proposed for
this parcel of land. The entire area surrounding this parcel is single-family
residential. The few other businesses that are in the area have been
incorporated into the single-family homes that already existed on those
properties.
e
e
I am concerned about a number of things within this proposal. First of all, to
have to look out my windows at the back of a two story building was going to be
eyesore enough but now to possibly have to look at a 39.S.foot building is just
disheartening. Second, the request to reduce the side setback from 20 to 10
feet just brings the monstrosity closer to my home. Third, after visiting the
planning department and meeting with Mr. Mike Reynolds and Mr. Scott Rice,
and discussing the proposed plans, I have even more objections. According to
the development plan a dumpster is planned to sit in the southeast corner of the
lot. This would be immediately west of my home and would not only be an
attraction to wildlife, but would be an intrusion both aesthetically and audibly.
Having to listen to a garbage truck pick up a dumpster and set it back down will
be unacceptable. My husband and I are planning a family and the bedroom in
our house closest to this planned development is to be a nursery. The lights
from the parking lot will be a problem as well as the noise that will be heard.
The only thing proposed to separate my home from this building, parking lot,
and dumpster will be a 6 ft wooden privacy fence. This fence will do nothing to
block sight or sound. Our house sits up approximately four feet due to being
zoned in the county and having to have a raised septic field. A 6 ft fence will do
nothing to provide privacy, nor a sufficient sound barrier.
I also have concerns over the proposed drainage. When we have moderate to
heavy rains, which are common in Florida, there is already a problem with
freestanding water as a result of poor percolation. By adding additional run-off,
which is proposed to gravitate to a ditch behind our home, this will lead to
flooding of our backyard.
Yet another concern will be added traffic to an already congested area,
specifically Drew Street. Once you've crossed over McMullen Booth Road to the
east it becomes a two-lane road that is congested, as it is without adding in
additional usage.
This area is, as I stated earlier, is completely single-family homes with a beautiful
family ballpark, access to the East-West trail for recreation and exercise, and a
Church proposed for the southeast corner of Drew Street and McMullen Booth
Road. All of which define a family neighborhood and atmosphere. The addition
of a 39.S.foot building will do nothing to add to the neighborhood. The addition
of a 39.S foot office building will only lead to the depreciation of the neighboring
properties and will have an overall negative affect visually on the surrounding
area. A 39.S-foot building will be completely out of place in an area that is made
up of single-family homes, a ball field and a Church. An office building of this
magnitude does not fit into this family oriented atmosphere.
,'"
e
e
~
In regard to another matter, I am disturbed by Mr. Dabiri's practices. It was
brought to my attention, through a letter submitted to you, Ms. Goudeau, by Mr.
Stephen Losonczy, that as a result of his wife writing a letter of objection, Mr.
Dabiri waited for her outside of her home to confront her on her objection. I
find this to be completely inappropriate and very unprofessional. He stated that
his" high-rise building would not affect her surroundings since it was not in her
back vard...." By this statement that he made is he then admitting that if it
were in her back yard that it would affect her and her surroundings? Well his
"hi9h-rist!' will be in my back yard and it will greatly affect me!
I thank you for your time and consideration and feel that the reasons stated
within this letter are more than sufficient to deny these proposed changes.
,/
'. .
e
e
117 McMullen Booth Road
Petition pg 1
NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION
OBJECTING PROPOSED FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
OF 117 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD
CASE #: FLD2003-11061
Each homeowner will initial the number(s) assigned to the proposed changes as they are
written in the NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC
HEARINGS. By initialing the number assigned to these proposed changes, the
homeowner is submitting their objection to any and all requests for change as requested
by Massoud and Malouse Dabiri.
Also, by signing this petition, if unable to attend the hearing on Tuesday March 16, 2004
at 2:00 pm in the City Commission Chambers in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola
Avenue, Clearwater, FL, each homeowner is granting Ehren Cline of 3116 Bay Lane,
Clearwater, FL 33759 the right to represent them on their objections, and only on their
objections, at said meeting, unless otherwise stated in a separate letter of concern or
objection.
The attached list of names and addresses was provided by the City of Clearwater, Clerk's
office, of the people that were to receive notification of said meeting. These people were
contacted and have signed this form as proof of objection to one, or all, of the proposed
changes, as signified by their initials and signature.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
Massoud & Malouse Dabiri are requesting a flexible development approval:
#1: to reduce the number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces;
#2: to reduce the front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement);
#3: to reduce the side setback from 20 to 10 feet (to pavement);
#4: building height increase to 39.5 feet
~ re rr;; [-~ n on re W""\i 1
o u;.'!) ", , \!J U; I
~~
Pt.AI'iN!NG & DEVELOP;'iilENT s...c~
CITY OF CLEARWATER I
l
I
Andrea D. Sofarelli
3137 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759 1
a~~R
Irn
~.. ~ectt~o. .
#1 #2
#3 #4
,h~ object to: IJJ~
#~ #2NJt;t
#3~ #4 7llZ
Elizabeth S. Beck
3124 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, F~ ~3f59
U;~/-al--YdJ~"L
lizabeth S. Beck
Daniel G. Copeland
Tonya K. Copeland
314 Chamblee Lane
ter
Tonya K. Copeland
I object to: /? A
#1~ #2~
#3 t1-dI #4 0-<:7
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
Eric O. Smith
Colleen P. Smith
3131 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
Dolores L. Mohr
3161 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
Dolores L. Mohr
Colleen P. Smith
no one. hoVYl~
r[;. ~ect to:: I ....X:1. .... d"/
# 1 #2 ---kJf,L
#3 ' #4-ry
Howard Pleine~
3125 Chamblee Lane
C earwater, L
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
Robert C. Jensen
3130 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
v
e
117 McMullen Booth Road
Petition pg 2
~ I object to: 0
#1~ #2 ~.(
#3~ ~~.
Thomas B.\Cla~
3149 Chamblee Lane
~L33/59
Thomas B. Clark
I object to~:
#1~ #2
#3 ~..... #4
#1
#3
~v
K
jY
r.i=:~ fl.
! \ DJ LE Lr;.Js.. '
t I 11"'\ "
, I 'i
, I
I obj bi fo1
#1JJ.j}!J . r.#.....A...I"f~[;E\~ !.::LOF'-;,
#3;/J-M ~ #4 IT "( C( r:.A;~'N
Nga Thanh Mai
Tony Le Doan
3107 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
Nga Th~ Mai /i
7rAJathvvJJ}m{/t~
t Tony Le Doan-
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
Victoria R. Gomez
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
Helen L. Baker
3101~deaux LaUl )
~~~
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
'-, '~-
'lv'
Q obj ct~r
#4 f
JOSePh'- Grady Jr.
Kim N. Grady
3118 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, FL 3375
e
117 McMullen Booth Road
Petition pg 3
*Iobjectto:.!%
#l .' #2
#3 . . #4 .
Patricia F. Zeigler
3154 Chamblee Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
I object to: .L -:t ./
#1~ #2 ---Z-l ~
#3 -4-2L-- #4----Lif';<-
Eugene F. Egan
3145 Bordeaux Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
~:fqt-
Ruth D. Cochrane
~blject to:~
#1" #2'
#3 ,'. #4
~bject to~:
#1 ' #2
# #4 .
Michael S. Kelly
Linda K. Kelly
3115 Bordeaux Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
"
\jJt'
'7
)~~
?) \ \J
~
)t~g
'.."i.....~~ .. ~s.clf 'V.l rc. '-~.'
-... L!;-, \ ~! II
t. ... G J ".~...".,,-----.~ \. II
't ' b 1
I U Q MA~i" 7.0U', 'lill
e
117 McMullen Booth Road
Petition pg 4
#lgJEect;B~
#3 #4 ~
Dan L. Noll
3133 Bay Lane
Cle ater, FL 33759
t
I object to: I object to: I ob ect to:
#1 #2 #1 #2 #2 ~-y.J
#3 #4 #3 #4 #4 ;en
'\ \
.,"-'
Thomas R. Rotella
Cynthia L. Rotella
124 K Street
Clearwater, FL 33759
Thomas R. Rotella
Tim Swezey Cynthia L. Rotella
;/liee' W:{f I object to: I object to:
#1 .. #2""""'" #1 #2 #1 #2
#3"" #4 #3 #4 #3 #4
c\~* A. see~
~ ews~
Ie '\0"
Christopher A. Seeger
Carol F. Albrecht
Ehren M. Cline
M. Lorraine Cline
3116 Bay Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
:~iect~
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
La V onne Murray
3124 Bay Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
La V onne Murray
~I obj.ect to:
#1 . eN #2~W
#3 t/ #46-'J.LL-W
. ,
o j~~.~-I.J.L.~m~rll i
i\ M.AHi, 'I :'U!!" IUD
"'<.. I ObleCt.to..N;jTCfifoet:lm);~!E'NT S~~ ct to:
::= i :-S::;flOF CL';RW'~3R :;. ~
Jennifer L.a!r Velma W, "1z~~
Gab~'el-C. tney 3129 ~"'~t
313 ~ treet Clearw lU:T:'-Et 33759
Cle r, FL 33759
Gabriel C. Whitney
I object to:
#1 #2~U
#3 #4 ----.--:"\-
Anthony ~6afJ~iS
Ekaterini a~~~s
III McM~1 ooth Road
Cle J\' FL 33759
y R. Damianakis
f>,.
I object to:
#1 #2 n,
#3 #4 ==;:V
William E.J3h~flll&"
Kathy Bha e
3142 Feath~~ ourt
Clearwat~):; 33759
.
#1
#3
Cynthia L. Tull
I object to:
#I~ #2J!1f
#3 ~ #4 -kCT
Marion Thomson
3106 Featherwood Court
Clearwater, FL 33759
#1
#3
aczor
~;OQject to: A:("'n
#1 fft./ #2 V u ~
#3 (fv #4<1.10 -
Frank A. D'Amico Jr.
Johonna H. D' Amico
3100 Featherwood Court
Clearwater, FL 3375;
O~t1.i::J~ .
i~..'.! Fr:Jj;;;t2o' 1r. ~
"7Ill . '/J/U j 1'..#
I.' Johonna H. D'Amico
e
117 McMullen Booth Road
Petition pg 5
#1 "llobject~~:J~A
\^! #3~ #4~
Fred S. Aarts, Jr.
Helen M. Aarts
3 141 Drew Street
Clearwater, FL 33759
lf~ed~rlt:s!J~;t
Helen M. Aarts
I object to:
:; :~~
KaY~~'" '
3124 Feath ood Court
lea~~, L 33759
y L. Welch
.
#1 I Object~~~: .
#3 #4
Stefanie J.-.H r
3130 Feat~o Court
Clearwa~\~t 33759
~\J"
fanie J. Harder
"
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
..
"
.. :za-.h...--'----h..-----.
f', l"~.. fE 11 \l,~~ ~ '-r-~ ")
I I. :::I ~_~ I \,1 Lr.; , I
'u<!-......-.- .., jJ
, : \ : l 1'1 '
,! i I MAR ,1 !~qO{ .
i- J
.1 0~.I.pct.1;(r::"..'".......~. ..'.,..... " '-.,', ,,'-'- :~"". --..'. ---'. -. '. I APi ct to'
" ~r.-;i':'~.~.fJ!/j "1 {Jr.)!-:, l SV~'S- .
#1~' #2. . h"', ()r'(;tj,j)I::.~\'tiL_ #2_
#3G't.)~#4.' .'W""'_'....-n--~ ' #4_
Jennifer L. .WhitneY V~lma . Tizon f\ /
Gabriel C. Whitney 31 ew S~P
3137 Drew Street Cle r, FL 7
Cia Wrf,i 3375 ~ ~
n' e L ey elm~ . on
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
Ekaterini Damianakis
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
~.~bjeclto:~
#1 . #2 ~
#3 #4~
William E. Bhame
Kathy L. Bham
3142 Featherwo rt
C[,aw, F 59
.. \J lI~e
~ Kathy L. Bhame
Jerzy Kaczor
Alicja Kaczor
3112 Featherwood Court
Clearwater, FL 33759
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
I object to:
#1 #2~ ./
#3 #4 -?\:-_
Frank A. D~r.
JOhOnna* ico
3100 Fe od Court
Cle , 33759
~UllY
Cyn . L. Tully
3148F t ~#
_~_' FL\\\-,,<
~
Cynthia L. Tull
Johanna H. D'Amico
e
117 McMullen Booth Road
Petition pg 5
#l-i!(~~ect~~:J<vJ J
#3 -atfl1 #4 4lJl!
Kay L. Welch
3124 Featherwood Court
Clearwater, FL 33759
4(u~y1!~
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
Stefanie J. Harder
3130 Featherwood Court
Clearwater, FL 33759 0
'(\0
~~
Stefanie J. Harder \ \
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
.wd)ll~-=I~o~ )
\'Tate" F~U
~all
..
c~.. . :-:----"-_'5'~~\YJ ~---_._-'"-,::-~;-~
(p_1 >'.' 'I'
Pi ~ llf) If: d - . I :~,
U ) ----::'--....-- ,~
, ..
: ) -
r \ ';,}
~
Steven A. De Busschere
3136 Featherwood Court
Kate~~
Steven A. De Busschere
Deborah J. Ezell
.
~IObjectto:~
#1 #2
#3 . #4
Siman B. Halim
3141 Feat ood Court
Clearw r, L 33759
..
tl
~o ~ctto:.~/
# . #2 _ .
#3 #4
Gregory A. Kowbel
Wanda J. Kowbel
3107 Featherwood Court
Cle<1TWater, FL 33759
Per,feito ~
e el~t
rwoo 0
Cle er, FL 9
, ~
Antho~ ItO
Ana Perfeito
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
l/,j) 'UAtOt-
VlJf ..' ~I.l~l
Wan a J. Kowbe -
tV
.;. I ~l}ect to:
#~ #2~:Y/
#~ #~
I object to:
#1~ #2~
#3~ #4~
:~!
e
117 McMullen Booth Road
Petition pg 6
I object to:
#1\) ri- #2~
#3 V *- #4 0 C 1
Victor G. Harberson
3131 Featherwood Court
Clearwater; FL 33759
}J~~
Victor G. Harberson
~bject to:#c
#ll'r. #2.r
#3 {'F. #4 -F,
i. object tor..
# I , #2\t:../
#3 #4~
Montie R. Bailey, JT.
3119 F eatherwood Court
Clearwater, FL 33759
I object to:
#1 #2
#3 #4
NEltTHBOlrnOOD PEtTION
117 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD
CASE #: FLD2003-11061
e
As is evidenced in the following petition objecting to the proposed flexible development
of the above referenced case number, 38 homeowners were contacted and 35 ofthe 38
signed obiectinl! to all of the chanl!es. This is an average of92% of homeowners in the
surrounding neighborhoods that are opposed to the proposed variances.
PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT ONE OR MORE PROPERTY OWNERS AT THE
FOLLOWING ADDRESSES SIGNED THE ATTACHED PETITION
OBJECTING TO ALL FOUR OF THE REQUESTED PROPOSED FLEXIBLE
DEVELOPMENT. 35/38 = 92%
1. 3137 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
2. 3124 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
3. 3142 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
4. 3149 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
5. 3131 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
6. 3143 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
7. 3125 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
8. 3107 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
9. 3118 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
10.3154 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
11. 3145 Bordeaux Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
12.3139 Bordeaux Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
13. 3133 Bordeaux Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
14.3115 Bordeaux Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
15.3111 Bay Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
16.3116 Bay Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
17. 3133 Bay Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
18.3144 Bay Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
19.3121 Bay Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
20. 116 K Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
21. 3141 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
22.3137 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
23.3106 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
24.3100 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
25.3136 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
26.3131 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
27.3113 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
28.3141 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
29.3125 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
30. 3107 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
31. 3119 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
32.3101 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
33.3155 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
34. 3124 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
35.3112 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
nC'~~ r~ f@ n W ~ fn',\!
'I: ,.--=--.~,..._7,_"~",_,...--,_-"",,,,,,_,._,_,,,,.': (l
) ; Ii I i
': . . I !!
l '~J.. :;; IJ
' i'~ ' '. \ i r 1 I I
I. '. '. J' '
i L1 UI_.:.:, ,., ", "<'""';"';7":~"-;::;~'" r'~'
l c'."t;'c__~:._:_~:~~:J~~:\~h,~'j~%N; 0~\i~
., NEIGHBORHOOD PE'TION
117 MCMULLEN BOOTH ROAD
CASE #: FLD2003-11061
e
U J [~ T~ -i-~~~ fq ~.~. p. I
Dr:; j "
I Ii, ,
IJ . T ~~R_"_:?n~~_ l!lJi
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING PROPERTy,'OWNEf{s' ~ ~t(:r:; ~V=J
WISH TO SIGN 3/38 - 8% . ,,-.
1. 3106 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
2. 124 K Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
3. 3149 Featherwood Court, Clearwater, FL 33759
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOT
AT HOME TO BE CONTACTED
1. 3155 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
2. 3161 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
3. 3130 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
4. 3136 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759 (doesn't speak English)
5. 3148 Chamblee Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
6. 3127 Bordeaux Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
7. 3109 Bordeaux Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
8. 3121 Bordeaux Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
9. 3124 Bay Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
10. 3137 Bay Lane, Clearwater, FL 33759
11. 120 K. Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
12. 112 K Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
13.3133 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
14.3137 Featherwood Court, FL 33759
15.3129 Drew Street, Clearwater, FL 33759
16. 111 McMullen Booth Road, Clearwater, FL 33759
17.3142 Featherwood Court, FL 33759
18.3148 Featherwood Court, FL 33759
19.3130 Featherwood Court, FL 33759
20.3118 Featherwood Court, FL 33759
/V~
l1~v~
e
aI.J cu-I- ~
~/
c.?~/2-- C) y
e
(?/J~(/rJ/{JA.. //,(7 Wrn. 4;.., 'r-~J
/J/~ ~
-#
;., HI./c.e. ~/l.e>.It/v
~-s;,o+f- \ c'-'-e-
3v:2~... .... r~~
tJc/~ tu~
S,. lEi> WALSi-I
6. Elarfa'J C(r~
':? Lc,~~I-e C(t"h .e
3 efLN.l.e ~~~
r.f'"6:2- ~PJ6
5"Co '2 - '-{'?9 (
7 D j/-<;.j./fo .2- -~ <,/ Co '-
7;;"'7-777'~ ~~~)
,3 I .2... / 64 y L4N tE '72. 1 ~ 79 <}, ~ ~ S {
11 It t!~ l~ 7Ji - n7, ~/:Jr
31ft. ,s~ ~ ... -1}" 7~1 - ~l;J'(
I ~ ~ t'-t {, 'oCfllt' Aut: ~<f' (. t2 7-5(
/J /FLj' ~~,
e:- V\,l ",-ee.a. pi' '\
e
e
u..
o
>-
I-
u
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: E.-A 1".#..41 e /I.~ ---e/
FAX: If'l?- ..., Vf / /
Phone:
DATE:
/Vt11U- ~~(t/,f Phone: J'=t). -- ~J':J'
J '-11- 0 V SUBJECT: ~ :Lt>o3 - 110(;, /
/17 ~ A"~. h R~~/.<../ I'Jd ~ m
YI-o~
FROM:
MESSAGE:
~.R a/h:t.du?~ doVh?~
I, iJ'~// hr''b/r
?o /)7
,
;J;,
4/// &/ ~~r/t/-Elr
~A"V
, /
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
cJ
,
e
e
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
March 16.2004
F'LD2003-11061
E8
Mr. and Mrs. Massoud Dabiri
Keith E. Zayak. P.R, RLA
117 N. McMullen Booth Road
ORlG'~J ,^
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of parking
spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and
south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback
from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase
to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the
provisions of Section 2-1004.B.
EXISTING ZONINGILAND USE: Office (0) District; Residential/Office Limited (RlOL)
Category
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.67 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Residential (vacant)
Proposed Use: Offices
ADJACENT ZONINGILAND USES:
North: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District; Single family
residential
West: Institutional (I) District; Vacant
East: Outside city limits; single family residential
South: Office (0) District; Residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIA TE VICINITY: Heavily traveled highway, single family residential, and vacant land.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: This .67-acre site is located on the southeast side of the
intersection of McMullen Booth Road and Drew Street. The site is heavily wooded and has two
existing single-family residential structures with driveways accessing Bay Lane to the immediate
south. One of the structures has a second driveway accessing Drew Street. The property has three
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 1
e
e
frontages: Bay Lane, McMullen Booth Road, and Drew Street. Bay Lane is a very narrow road
with 18 feet of pavement width.
Proposal: The proposal is to demolish two existing single-family residential houses and construct
an 11,350 square foot office building, 39.5 feet in height, with a 32-space parking lot. The
proposal seeks an increase in building height beyond the 30-foot limit and a reduction from the 34
parking spaces required. Proposed access to the site is limited to two curb cuts on Drew Street.
The application is seeking Flexible Development approval. to reduce the number of parking spaces
from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height
increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-
1004.B.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-1001 and 2-1004):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.39 X
AREA RATIO (FAR)
(0.40)
IMPERVIOUS 0.62 X
SURFACE RA TIO
(ISR) (0.75)
LOT AREA 0.67 acre; 29,085 square feet X
(minimum) (N/A)
LOT WIDTH 132.36 feet X
(minimum) (N/A)
FRONT SETBACK West: 25 feet (to building); X*
(25 feet) North: 10 feet (to pavement); and
South: 10 feet (to pavement)
SIDE SETBACK (20 East: 10 feet to (pavement) X*
feet)
HEIGHT (maximum 39.5 feet X*
30 feet)
PARKING SPACES 32 spaces x*
(3 spaces per 1,000
square feet)
*See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 2
e
It
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Section 2-1004 B):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The use or rrux of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X
Redevelopment Project is compatible with adiacent land uses.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X
uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16. 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 3
e
e
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. X
2. X
3. X
4. X
5. of the X
6. X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
January 29, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to permit an 11,350 square foot office building with a reduction to the
number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, a reduction to the front setbacks (north and south)
from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development
under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. for the site at 117 N. McMullen Booth Road, with the
following bases and conditions.
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast comer of the site, no grade changes are to
occur within the drip line, an aeration system is to be designed to preserve the tree, crushed
concrete is to be used in the design as the tree will not tolerate lime rock (submit prior to
building permit issuance);
2. That the site plan be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, to enlarge the landscaped
island between the two curb cuts and relocate the loading zone to two spaces immediately
south of where the loading zone is shown on the site plan date revised 2-3-04, ensuring a
24 foot wide minimum drive aisle (submit prior to building permit issuance);
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 4
e
e
3. That the site plan be revised to a) correctly state the parking required and provided parking,
and b) address the Fire Department concern for a 28 foot turning radius ingress/egress for
emergency vehicles (submit prior to building permit issuance;
4. That a Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to e.O. by the applicant;
5. That an approved right-of-way permit be obtained from Pinellas County prior to issuance
of a City of Clearwater Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension;
6. That an approved health permit be obtained from Pinellas County Health for sanitary
connection prior to issuance of a building permit;
7. That a reduced pressure back flow preventor device be required if the proposed use re-
quires one to be installed;
8. That a redevelopment credit of 50% be applied to existing conditions hydrology with 1
hour Time of Concentration (before building permit issuance);
9. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance;
10. That documentation of abandonment of septic system(s) be provided prior to Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That an irrigation plan sheet be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
12. That the landscape plan sheet be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
13. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
14. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located
underground; and
15. That all signage meet Code, consist of channel letters for any wall signs, and be architec-
turally integrated to the design of the building and site.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
~r~.I.L P'? ~___
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning Departmenl\C D lJIFLEXlPending cases\Up for the next CDB\McMullen Booth 117 Dabiri Office Building (0 !\McMullen Booth 117
Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16,2004 - Case FLD2003-11061 - Page 5
1'-1 t':Wv1 C tif [) ( (r) B oo1l;
.,
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
HA~SEN,GERTRUDE
3155 CHAMBLEELN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
SOFARELLI, ANDREA D
3137 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
CHILDERS, CHERYL A
PO BOX 730
SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 -
P ASSARIS, ELEFTHERIOS
PASSARIS, MARIA
3106 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
BECK, ELIZABETH S
3124 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
COPELAND, DANIEL G
COPELAND, TONY A K
3142 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
EGAN, EUGENE F
3145 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 3702
COCHRANE, EDW ARD R
COCHRANE, RUTH D
3127 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
EAKER, HELEN L
3109 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 3702
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
CLARK, THOMAS B
3149 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
SMITH, ERIC 0
SMITH, COLLEEN P
3131 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
BELCHER, H STEVEN
1504 JAN ANN CT
WASHINGTON IN 47501 - 3746
ACCETIA,JOHN J
ACCETIA,ALLATHAI
11770 BARB CT
LARGO FL 33778 - 3803
JENSEN, ROBERT C
3130 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
PORTSMOUTH, THOMAS E
GOMEZ, VICTORIA R
3148 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
HODGES, RAY
HODGES, SHARON K
3139 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
SWANBERG, SCOTI D
TRISKA, LORI M
3121 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
f::'~.'i[)
" 11{){~1
I
lviOHR, DOLORES L
3161 CHAMBLEELN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
REESE, DONNA L
3143 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
PLEINES, HOWARD
3125 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3708
MAl, NGA THANH
DOAN, TONY LE
3107 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759-
GRADY, JOSEPHF JR
GRADY, KIM N
3118 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
RO, MYONG-HUI
3136 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
ZEIGLER, PATRICIA F
3154 CHAMBLEE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3707
LOSONCZY, STEPHEN R
LOSONCZY, IRENE D
3133 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
KELLY, MICHAEL S
KELLY, LINDA K
3115 BORDEAUX LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3702
LOUNTZIS, FOTIOS LAMOUREUX, ERNEST A
LOUNTZIS, SPYRIDOULA LAMOUREUX, CHERYL D
24-31 157TH ST 3111 BAY LN
WHITESTONE QUEENS Nri'l1!ffl ".. I.... .,.. C~RW ATER FL 33759 - 4402
11357 - 3744 f'iW ~ 1.. r::
DAMIANAKIS, ANTHONY R
DAMIANAKIS, EKATERINI
111 MC MULLEN BOOTH RD
CLEARWATER FL 33759 -
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CL WTR
D/B/A CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH
331 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002
CLINE, EHREN M
3116 BAY LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401
e
e
KELLY, THOMAS
107 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4450
i CALVARY OPEN BIBLE
CHURCH
11 S MCMULLEN BOOTH RD
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4419
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CL WT
DfB/ A CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH
331 CLEVELAND ST
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002
DABIRI, MASSOUD
DABIRI, MALOUSE
3024 HA VERFORD DR
CLEARWATER FL 33761 -
MURRAY, LA VONNE
3124 BAY LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4401
TIZON, VELMA W
3129 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710
SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER A WHITNEY, JENNIFER L COMER, LONNIE B
3133 DREW ST WHITNEY, GABRIEL C C/O SWEZEY, TIM
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 3137 DREW ST 3137 BAY LN
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402
NOLL, DAN L WALSH, EDWARD J AARTS, FRED S JR
3133 BAY LN WALSH, LORRAINE E AARTS, HELEN M
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 3121 BAYLN 3141 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4402 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3710
JOHNSON, MARGARET S ALBRECHT, CHRISTIAN D CURRY, TONJA
EARNHARDT, LETTIE M ALBRECHT, CAROL F 116 K ST
3144 BAY LN 112 K ST CLEARWATERFL 33759 - 4409
CLEARWATER FL 33759 -4401 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409
CONNOLLY, MATTHEW J ROTELLA, THOMAS R D'AMICO, FRANK A JR
120 K ST ROTELLA, CYNTHIA L D'AMICO, JOHONNA H
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4409 124 K ST 3100 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4409 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
THOMSON, MARION KACZOR, JERZY GOSNELL, JAN T
3106 FEATHERWOOD CT KACZOR, ALICJA 3118 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4412 3112 FEATHERWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
WELCH, KAY L HARDER, STEF ANIE J DE BUSSCHERE, STEVEN A
3124 FEATHERWOOD CT 3130 FEATHERWOOD CT 3136 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
BHAME, WILLIAM E
BHAME, KATHY L
3142 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
TULLY, JOE
TULLY, CYNTHIA L
3148 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4412
COLGAN, CATHERINE
SEYLER, MARTHA J
41 ELLEN DR
ROCKA WAY NJ 07866 -
EZELL, WILLIAM J
EZELL, DEBORAH A
3149 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
HARBERSON, VICTOR G
3131 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
SALIM, THEODORE N
SALIM, AMAL G
3113 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc
101 Philippe Pkwy, Suite 205
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
e
HALIM, SIMAN B
3141 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
FRANKICH, PETER N
3125 FEA THERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
KOWBEL, GREGORY A
KOWBEL, WANDA J
3107 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 -
Harbour Towne Condominium
Association
Joan Hennly, LCAM
350 Bayshore Blvd.
Clearwater, FL 33759
-
PERFEITO, ANTHONY
PERFEITO, ANA
3137 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4455
BAILEY, MONTIE R JR
3119 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4455
GRIZZLE, ANTHONY D
3101 FEATHERWOOD CT
CLEARW ATER FL 33759 - 4455
':::B 1[1 I t 1t::i F'EF'I]F'T
e
.
Mar. 11 2004 03:31PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO.
Cit~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FRCSIMILE
01 94425911
STRRT TIME USRGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT
Mar. 11 03:28PM 03'02 SND 09 OK
TO TURN CFF REPORT, PRESS ' M8'1..J' 004.
TI-EN SELECT CFF BY USING ' +' OR ' -'.
Fffi FAX ~~ ASSISTANCE, PLEASE a:u... 1-BOO-+ELP-FAX (435-7329).
~ -- e
LL
0
>-
I-
-
U
TO:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
rP-lAA ~yalG
793-- ?PJr
FAX:
Phone:
.-
FROM:
/l1/ke ~/4~
3-10.- ~ L.( SUBJECT:
Phone: J6 -z. -f,/PJ 1:,
~ ~()J //0 ~I
;11 ,IV: /'(c..~truu~ & 017-1
DA TE:
MESSAGE: ...--.L.L _ 1. /J
dh W1r~
It /. cI~// ~~d
,:. Cru.z ..M ~ ~
i#-? A. ~ "L-o/ o!'( c ~ y
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 07
~
e
e
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
March 16. 2004
FLD2003-11061
E8
Mr. and Mrs. Massoud Dabiri
Keith E. Zavak. P.E.. RLA
117 N. McMullen Booth Road
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of parking
spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and
south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), reduce the side setback
from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height increase
to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the
provisions of Section 2-1004.B.
EXISTING ZONINGILAND USE: Office (0) District; Residential/Office Limited (RlOL)
Category
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.67 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Residential (vacant)
Proposed Use: Offices
ADJACENT ZONINGILAND USES:
North: Low Medium Residential (LMDR) District; Single family
residential
West: Institutional (I) District; Vacant
East: Outside city limits; single family residential
South: Office (0) District; Residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Heavily traveled highway, single family residential, and vacant land.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: This .67 -acre site is located on the southeast side of the
intersection of McMullen Booth Road and Drew Street. The site is heavily wooded and has two
existing single-family residential structures with driveways accessing Bay Lane to the immediate
south. One of the structures has a second driveway accessing Drew Street. The property has three
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16. 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 1
e
e
frontages: Bay Lane, McMullen Booth Road, and Drew Street. Bay Lane is a very narrow road
with 18 feet of pavement width.
Proposal: The proposal is to demolish two existing single-family residential houses and construct
an 11,350 square foot office building, 39.5 feet in height, with a 32-space parking lot. The
proposal seeks an increase in building height beyond the 30-foot limit and a reduction from the 34
parking spaces required. Proposed access to the site is limited to two curb cuts on Drew Street.
The application is seeking Flexible Development approval to reduce the number of parking spaces
from 34 to 32 spaces, to reduce the front setbacks (north and south) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), reduce the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), and a building height
increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development under the provisions of Section 2-
l004.B.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-1001 and 2-1004).
.
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.39 X
AREA RATIO (FAR)
(0.40)
IMPERVIOUS 0.62 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (0.75)
LOT AREA 0.67 acre; 29,085 square feet X
(minimum) (N/A)
LOT WIDTH 132.36 feet X
(minimum) (N/ A)
FRONT SETBACK West: 25 feet (to building); X*
(25 feet) North: 10 feet (to pavement); and
South: 10 feet (to pavement)
SIDE SETBACK (20 East: 10 feet to (pavement) X*
feet)
HEIGHT (maximum 39.5 feet X*
30 feet)
PARKING SPACES 32 spaces X*
(3 spaces per 1,000
square feet)
*See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 2
e
e
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Section 2-1004 B):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The use or rmx of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X
Redevelopment Proiect is compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X
uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 3
e
e
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. X
2. X
3. X
4. X
5. of the X
6. X
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
January 29, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to permit an 11,350 square foot office building with a reduction to the
number of parking spaces from 34 to 32 spaces, a reduction to the front setbacks (north and south)
from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement), and a building height increase to 39.5 feet, as a Comprehensive Infill Development
under the provisions of Section 2-1004.B. for the site at 117 N. McMullen Booth Road, with the
following bases and conditions.
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Referring to the 30" pine tree at the southeast comer of the site, no grade changes are to
occur within the drip line, an aeration system is to be designed to preserve the tree, crushed
concrete is to be used in the design as the tree will not tolerate lime rock (submit prior to
building permit issuance);
2. That the site plan be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, to enlarge the landscaped
island between the two curb cuts and relocate the loading zone to two spaces immediately
south of where the loading zone is shown on the site plan date revised 2-3-04, ensuring a
24 foot wide minimum drive aisle (submit prior to building permit issuance);
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 4
e
e
3. That the site plan be revised to a) correctly state the parking required and provided parking,
and b) address the Fire Department concern for a 28 foot turning radius ingress/egress for
emergency vehicles (submit prior to building permit issuance;
4. That a Traffic Impact fee to be assessed and paid prior to e.O. by the applicant;
5. That an approved right-of-way permit be obtained from Pinellas County prior to issuance
of a City of Clearwater Building Permit for the sanitary sewer extension;
6. That an approved health permit be obtained from Pinellas County Health for sanitary
connection prior to issuance of a building permit;
7. That a reduced pressure back flow preventor device be required if the proposed use re-
quires one to be installed;
8. That a redevelopment credit of 50% be applied to existing conditions hydrology with 1
hour Time of Concentration (before building permit issuance);
9. That all Fire Department concerns be addressed prior to building permit issuance;
10. That documentation of abandonment of septic system(s) be provided prior to Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That an irrigation plan sheet be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
12. That the landscape plan sheet be revised to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
13. That a Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning staff, prior to
building permit issuance;
14. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located
underground; and
15. That all signage meet Code, consist of channel letters for any wall signs, and be architec-
turally integrated to the design of the building and site.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
~r~~.L ~ ~___
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner
A IT ACHJ\t1ENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\McMullen Booth 117 Dabiri Office Building (O]\McMullen Booth 117
Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - March 16, 2004 - Case FLD2003-11 061 - Page 5
.e
;CITY CLERtltEPT.
~ ;727 562 4086
#
2/ 2
3- 1 0-04; 1 1 : 53
Mr. S. Losonczy
3133 Bordeaux Lane
Clearwater, FL 33759
RECEIVED
MAR 10 2004
Cynthis E. Goudeau, CMC
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Fl. 33759
~~~:~ICIAL RECORDS AND
.;:GfSLATIVE SRVCS DEPT
Dear Ms. Goudeau;
Irene Losonczy wrote you last week stating an objection to the development of 117 McMullen
Booth Rd. Today as she came home from work, a man was waiting in his Jeep Cherokee, on the
road,and he then stood in the driveway as she got out of her car in the garage. He approached her
saying, "you Irene?" And she just said nothing when he started saying he is Mr. Dabiri, and there
is no way his hi-rise building would affect our surroundings since it is not in my immediate back
yard, and that he knows the property value would increase 2-3 times, etc. We know this is not
true, and my wife was quite unnerved, and politely said she had her opinion and then walked
away from him.
We did not think it was customary for someone petitioning approval to approach a homeowner in
an argumentative manner. As well, I share my wife's opinion in this matter, and we just felt you
should be aware of this occurrence.
::ty t -
~ S~Losonczy d
-~---
Wr~~'O'~/I/I__:'/'i
'f -' I
F.',,~ J-'-Jj
IJ1f'lNING -, - -...-.._
1 _ CITY & 01: "~(Ui ,--:7'", , I
_.,.~.ft..!.:.Y)/i'li' f' ... I !_;;, f
......._ t..,'
___.,______,1-
.
..'
C',Et I[i I t jC] F'EF'I]F'T
it
e
Mar. 10 2004 12:17PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FRX NO.
Cit~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FRCSIMILE
01 97939855
STRRT TIME USRGE TIME MODE PRGES RESULT
Mar. 10 12:13PM 04'04 SND 07 OK
TO TURN CFF REPORT, PRESS ' 1"1EI'I..J' 1*04.
THH4 SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX RDl.JI=ffi"r:G: RSS I STANCE, PL8=lSE au.. 1-800-HELP-FRX (435- 7329) .
3-10-04; 1 1 ; 53 ; CITY CL. DEPT.
;727 562 4086
e
# 1/ 2
u
City of Clearwater, Florida
Official Records and
Legislative Services Department
Phone (727) 562-4090
Fax (727) 562-4086
~ \~liRrwater
FAX MESSAGE
;:.;;"
TO:
LOCATION:
Planning
FAX NO.:
4865
COMMENTS:
See attached letter re CDB case
FROM:
Lois Norman, (727-562-4091)
DATE:
3/10/2004
NUMBER OF PAGES THIS MESSAGE (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 2
3-10-04; 1 1 : 53
; C I TV C.K DEPT.
e
;727 562 4086
# 2/
Mr. S. Losonczy
3133 Bordeaux Lane
Clearwater, Fl. 33759
Ore.- CIVrD
ht:",L.; t
Cynthis E. Goudeau, CMC
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Fl. 33759
MAR 10 2004
Dear Ms. Goudeau;
~~~:~IC!AL RECORDS AND
>GISlA. TIVE SRVCS DEPT
Irene Losonczy wrote you last week stating an objection to the development of 117 McMullen
Booth Rd. Today as she came home from work, a man was waiting in his Jeep Cherokee, on the
road,and he then stood in the driveway as she got out of her car in the garage. He approached her
saying, "you Irene?" And she just said nothing when he started saying he is Mr. Dabiri, and there
is no way his hi-rise building would affect our surroundings since it is not in my immediate back
yard, and that he knows the property value would increase 2-3 times, etc. We know this is not
true, and my wife was quite unnerved, and politely said she had heropinion and then walked
away from him.
We did not think it was customary for someone petitioning approval to approach a homeowner in
an argumentative manner. As well, I share my wife's opinion in this matter, and we just felt you
should be aware of this occurrence.
~-D fl (i:~:i':-/T.I..--\-VV/r- rs-- .
-'.~I
r: i Di" }, U ii'
FLA,liNiN(f7:-=-."";-,,-__.._ .~.
__C'TY8RE,.~~~~" -r:",!
--Q~~~:'-'i'"1r~ 1"''"'1
-~~I
3- 8-04; 11 :38
;CITY CLtIi DEPT.
~ ;727 562 4086
# 2/ 4
RECEIVED
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Fl. 33758-4748
Irene Losonczy
3133 Bordeaux Lane
OFfiCIAL Cleallrwrnater Fl Q~3,3.75.9 rn
RECORDS AND I
LEGISlATIVE SRVCS DEPT 1 0 ;:. J
I . _ t
, f '
Milk U a ~:Jlill
h.AI~NING & DEVELOPMl:Nl SvCtJ
CIlYOFClEARWA1ER
This is in response to notice concerning Massoud & Malouse Dabiri, re es
approval at 117 McMullen Booth Rd. FLD2003-II061.
MAR 0 8 200~
Dear Ms. Goudeau;
I am stating my objection to the proposed building height of39.5 feet. As discussed with our
neighbors, we feel that the view and aesthetic appearance would be compromised. There are no
surrounding buildings of more than 2-3 stories in the immediate McMullen Booth neighborhood.
As for need, less than 1 block away, on the West side of the road, there is a commercial/office
building with "space for lease" signs. That is also a one story structure.
I have no problem with an office building per se, but a building of more than 1-2 levels would be
much too obtrusive in an area with a well maintained ball field, neighboring houses, and a
supposedly beautiful church being built. We do not need a tall building to see out of our
windows, or shadowing our homes.
I thank you for hearing my concerns.
RrCtfW1Y. su SU~bm' cd
':iJ~~~
Ir~ne Losonczy
. .
. /~ ~
LL
0 I rwater
>-
I-
U
TO:
FAX:
Phone:
FROM:
DATE:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
/I,~ (n ~1./a/6
~ /
793 - 9j?o;r
-
M//(re R..Ry/lo /k- Phone: J-6 J.- -}?,P;] t
3- p- c; '" SUBJECT: H//~c).:?- //0 b I
/17 ~ /ttcA'u~ &o/)?- ~
MESSAGE:
):#1,
f /
~/~~ c/j;7~ Ll~~'/ /~~~/~
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) l--
3- 8-04; 1 1 : 38
;CITY CLE~DEPT.
~ ;727 562 4086
# 2/ 4
- ..
RECEIVED
Irene Losonczy
3133 Bordeaux Lane
OFFICIAL RECORDS AND Cle~ater F1 33 7~9~\\ff"ff:f
LEGISLATIVE SRVCS DEPT lroJ ~ [r;' ".. 1~'l...IQ..., ~
Ul1~AR 0 8 2~ J~
PLANNING & DEVELQPMENl SvCtl
CITYOFClEAHWA1ER
This is in response to notice concerning Massoud & Malouse Dabiri, re es
approval at 117 McMullen Booth Rd. FLD2003-II061.
MAR 08 2004
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FJ. 33758-4748
Dear Ms. Goudeau;
I am stating my objection to the proposed building height of 39.5 feet. As discussed with our
neighbors, we feel that the view and aesthetic appearance would be compromised. There are no
surrounding buildings of more than 2-3 stories in the immediate McMullen Booth neighborhood.
As for need, less than I block away, on the West side of the road, there is a commercial/office
building with "space for lease" signs. That is also a one story structure.
I have no problem with an office building per se, but a building of more than 1-2 levels would be
much too obtrusive in an area with a well maintained ball field, neighboring houses, and a
supposedly beautiful church being built. We do not need a tall building to see out of our
windows, or shadowing our homes.
I thank you for hearing my concerns.
" ';:B mJ IIC:' F'EF CPT
.
e
Mar. 08 2004 01:38PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO.
Cit~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE
01 97939855
START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
Mar. 08 01:37PM 01'23 SND 02 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS ' MeU' tI:04.
THBI SB...ECT OFF BY US I NG · +' OR ' -' .
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PL.EASE a:u.. l-Em--tELP-FAX (435-7329).
EXHIBIT C
RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
CRITERIA
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and
development standards.
The applicant is requesting an 1I11.:rease in height li'om 30 to 39.5 leet and a
reduetion of the li'ont and side setbacks. The increase in height from 30 to 39.5
leet remains consistent with the three story standard requirement but provides a
height of 13 feet from floor to noor providing a more functional and higher end
interior appearance compatible with market driven demands.
The reduction of front setbacks along Drew Street and Bay Lane is for pavement
only. The building is setback 25 Icet from all three public right of ways. The
reduction of the side setback from 20 feet to 10 feet is also for pavement only.
The decrease in pavement setback allows the preservation of several trees on-site
while providing for a runctional parking lot.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive
infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting
properties.
Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will
be enhanced by the development of this office project. The adjacent offices are
older existing houses converted to an office use. The construction of a new office
building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting
properties, as well as increase the rair market value.
3. The uses within the comprehensive in fill redevelopment project are
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The proposed request II)r office is consistent with both the existing zoning and
future land use of the subject property and adjoining oilice parcels. The proposed
reductions are permissible via the City's Flexible Development standards.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive in fill redevelopment
project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The proposed office use of the property is consistent with adjacent office uses
south of the project and provides a buffer between a major arterial roadway and
the adjacent residential properties to the east. The use is also consistent with the
County Future Land Use designation
5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses
within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise
available in the City of Clearwater.
The parcel currently contains two abandoned houses zoned "Office". There are
no other parcels in the immediate desired area available that are compatible with
this zoning and Future Land Use designation.
(.. Thc dcn'lopmcnt of thc pun~c1 pl"Ctposcd fOI" dcvelopmcnt us u comprchcnsivc
infilll"cdc\'elopmcnt IU"ojl'cf will upgnulc thc inllncdiutc vicinity of thc purecl
proposcd for dcvelopmcnt.
The proposed onice development will replace two abandoned houses and greally
lIpgrade the immediate vicinity.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project
creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed investment made in the property by removal of abandoned
buildings and replacing with new office construction will benefit the immediate
area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent office property,
stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable office
space to increase the tax base of the City.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
The flexibility in regard to lot wide and required setbacks is due to the location of
three front setbacks arollnd the property and the desire to retain several existing
trees on the property. In addition. the 25 kcl from the McMullen Booth Right of
Way will include a significant amount of additional landscape material without
stormwater retention, signage or other structures. This will significantly increase
the appearance of the road frontage. The parking lot configuration will also
eliminate access and traffic impacts on Bay Lane which is more residential in
nature. Foundation plants are provided on three sides of the building as well as a
6 foot high privacy fence along the east property line abutting the residential use.
The increase in building height from 30 feet to 39.5 feet will set an upgraded
office design standard of higher ceilings, while maintaining a three story
maximum consistent with standard requirements.
~ ... ..
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-
street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required
parking per standard code will be provided on-site.
-...-.~-~-
r- ---::~ '::'..
;~ C -:=3 C:::"' I
I ~ .~ r=:::J.- -:.-" I ~
b~~1
-"",
l;-;~':I
b,i::"'tl
10r;~
~"~~
Imf71
'5:)5'
~}!
~;-1~1
m'.~
:o~
(I}
<
o
(f,
x
>
::::0
c=
-~~ .':='
8 ~
~ ;m
L-
M
~
~ ".1jo::1
I' ! "..Tn~'
!l ~ if m!H!;i ;
~, ~ il~J.n
:! li"l
li '..- HI,
Ii ~~ ~;;~ Uti
~i ~~ HH Hli
:.11," 11 0-"'- d~f.
'.-i. L! "I
I! ff ~h~
~d i S'~f~.
~l i:~!
D, ~ g_ !
;! J
- .
X
<0"
!il
~
o
__0:>......._0.._
..[~....OI'...-
....i.O...;.i
lij~ld:ift~~ac~r: >
HHHIHiH~
~npid~iiS...
n~,'PdH~
,~~,,!gH6'~
~~ppli~ny
LdHLHq
~PHH~H~~
P HnPI~~
.. ..~;;"" ~
~ ~"n ~ ~
~ ~~ "is :
~ ~
...
"
~r.~~'O.N.N....~.~NNN~~ ~
~ '~;gg~~~~~i~~~~~~d~~~~ ~
~ ~~~x~~$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
r ~ ~ e ~ z~ ~~ ~ 0
. g~ ~
,..
Ii
f~! at
,- P
~;.i . ~
i t~ 1
:i~ i
! t ~ ~
'H 1
f il i
"> .
I.
.'
ft
I
i
1;;;",;;:-
iiH:qHFi;
~ i !' I;' H l,'j ~ i
l.ol" '~i fl.' II
"~ it htl I- '" "
, . .' .' 1 i 1
~ i l! 1 'l.; -E~ ~1' 'i
, . i ~ I< ;; I'f i
l!;il;n:~j.~
· ; I, ita t lq i
~ 12 if I 1 P :l ~
~~li"ll: i l!lt
li~!i~: lC~ 1:
! . " Iii . I. "~
"II '! I,. I;; I
, f' .:$ l to H
.1 tl .;1 · {i '~
I ~ ('P j ~I 0
l: II i 1 f Y In
I l q ~. . "
j. lil' ;;1 t" ~i
~ ;1 ~ ~ L
,
I 11_10,0 ISs;'[ 10 QI~ or U:"~ :f
, .
...
...
'...
" ,~ .. .
~;: ~ ;;
.. ... .. .... co
1
.
J
I
1 ~J . r !;: B B
! ii 1 j I H fj
I hi! 0 'I'
J. , . i . !
\' j . I ' j/,~
, i i" '" ! ..,r f-
I j i I ;. ~~
I I f H jl
.. fl ii
i I I i! !:
~ ,. , ,
I ; !f f
i ~ I I
~ ;. '1"'1- ..,
j · P I
, ~ to. ~
I ! ,I ,
: If ·
I t'
· ~ ;1
iii'
it Ii
I i II
1 ~ ~~
t" i ~1.
i ' 'i
. j u
i 1j
i h
f !lJ :o{ 21 ~:-~I l; If ~t :
i gl 'I H li~ih: ii Ii I
, ~; h II d l~ 'I !l ;
'il;1 iw ~l,~J~;,!!!
I f Si" s~ iifti (n- h 1
J' ~ 19 jll l!lli i ~i i~ i
I 1;' II all I 1j i; .
! j II I' ;,., t " Ji "
I it !i iii! ~ Ii i! {
I d If ":Hi , .ol I~ ~
1llt. "I' . I Ij 1
~ I ~~ f~ &']' f ~ l ;
1 .!.l H' ! II .
, . . ",t . i
f /. ! It'~ !; i
:J ! 3.&,0( ~.
l I $ :Ij: ~ 1 l
i" l t i;2~ (I .:
. I I li{i 1., ~
li~f; ; I I;
i ~Il 1 ~ ; t
i ! I !! ;
. ll" ~
~ ! : ;
q 1I
i ~ .
-" ~~.DABlRI OFFICE BUILDING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PILOT CONSTRUCTION
TECHNOLOGY. INC.
200 9TH AVENUE NORTH
SUlTE 200
SAPETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695
PHONE: 727,725"2550
LANDSCAPE PLAN
I ji"
I t-I
N' "~A I 1
.,~ I I
~ii: t I
,
\I I
J I
t
C>
m
t~l II: I ~it It ~
,a :{ j ~ll' 1J ~
i~. ,I ~ _ " ,..
ill ~"U !
il: t! 1=1 ;
,,~ . ! j~l :
ih q ,Ii ·
i(! 1 . ;! I
1,1 ~ ,h.ol
~11 ? ';, ;
'I! .. l:'l "
l,; I i {!
!i.t ; f ..
L' 1 i l{
;.~ 1.' ,3
;=i !. H I
;h t f ~~ !
ID~ j 1 !; i"
:l~ IiI, :
ill : 6, f1 i
~1~ i: ~~ 1
,(~ ~ I 'I I.
It' ,. h
~j I ~ ;1
h. t ~ H
1>& ~,t
'tl
, I
1;
~~
~
.~I'MJ(Wl\1UJUi111
WTD--.owo.no._
K.E.lTtllA Y AC.. AS.scx:1A TE,S, INC
CMlUGINrWNc. L.A/'V5CAr'LAKCJ1tt.Ot.n ~
ftlDN;:717_lI>l_
f,",1%7."'--
~1<.IJlH7.At~
.
RECEIVED
-
UCL I. ri tUUj
PLANt\'''''f"' O'=PARTMENT
CITY OF l,'_E:ARVV. \T~R
,;
~
I
.,
\
Q)
>
+:i
o
Q)
a.
~
Q)
a..
+-'
U)
!
J:
t:
o
c:
\
,I
,
II
. ----- - ----. . = ~- --
.' ::
,- --- -,-
1--'1- ~- '------
II
I===~i~ --
II ~_L-_ --
-- -_r- --
~ ----
----..--
- - - - ----
Cll --
0 ~ ~
E , --
0 --
0 f .c ': =
III --,- --
10 C
.. q:: .- -
:J --- ..-
g -- :; 0
E~~ ~ ~
... ~ .c "
:E ~ III ...
~ ... ~
~CllCl C III
~.5; '0 UJ '0
~ -, .c ~
~~~ 5 :t::
Cll j..Cl ~ .a 'I'
~ ...~c: Ui 0 ~ Co ! ,
c c ~ ~ M :J .'
,g~Cl Q. ... Il) I .
.c .9
Cl ~ I'-
:2 e!~ UJ Cll ! ~
:E
Co ~j~ ~ ~ e I.!_....
.,.. C') .,.. <t
~ II
II
----
~- '.,-- ~-- =1_
C
m L~-! - 0
I ---
[I +-'
a3
II ----- >
M '. --, -l_, -1_ (])
,- - . .- -
. -. _..Jl - --- ...... Q)
II +-'
" fJ)
:;: = --- - -- ~- Q)
. ~
~-_._- l_
I -- - .
~
e
-
(0 ~ 0 0
I ro I 6
T-
III (II .,.. -l..
C')
+ + +
+
-tl
i
m
.-.
~
Q)
~
e
a --:-
~ ii-g~
.c jail.",
~ ~ e.~
~ ~~~
Q) os;... Cl
~ :>Gle:
F- c~~
~ ,g~Cl
.Ql tbGlX
~ c:....Q)
~ &5j~
e
~
en
(')
+
J
.'
~ ~
t. .c
~.!!l I
III e:
~ r;:
.s g --:-
.8 S ~
~ ~ ~
6 j D
(jj 0 e
e: () ~
~ ~ ~
III CJj :c
~ ~ ~
II
e
~
III
(II
+
II
.. ! ----
. ==:~ - - := ~ ---.-,......-
~ ;::
II
o
I
b
,...
+
=.
9
(:)
..!..
+
c
o
+-'
as
>
Q)
-
Q)
J:
-e
o
c
I
I
~
CD
~
e
:J
~ .s"C~
1: la~
~ ~ ~~
~ -g:~
CD l.... ell
a. ... m r:
~ r: r: ~
~ ,g~ell
.I:. ~CD)(
o ~ CD
~ /i5J~
e
~~
I::. .r::.
~ ~
III r:
~ 0;::
.s ~ .
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
.., .s lij
6 j .c
~ 0 ~
III 0 a
g. 2 ~
w UJ CD
1:
~ ~ ~
e
iD ~ ~ 0
I in 0 "
i'll C\I ... ...!..
C'l + + +
+
Co
I
in
I"-
....---
"
i
,-~~~ 1'_
- ... --'
_11 :--.J -
~_...-. __ ,:;: :!!:;;=ji 11 _-
: - --
i
.! I i
Ii __
~---~-_! -
~..-.""""Ji-"'-l i=_=
. i_ __1:
,~ .. "1: - --, - - ---
II
-
---">;1
--
--;--
l! __ _
===;=- -
II
I:
~.:
- --
~_J
"
- --....
.'
.:
-:
=
, - L [_j_~_
. =! ---: -
---:;- -
==--==__iiiiiiiiiiiIB ===
-.J_~~
~---
L
L:'~
--
'-=-
I!
------
-.-------- --
II
~.:I c:
I : I 0
I_=.l I ~
a1
>
--- (l)
-
- (l)
- -- +-'
._J en
a1
- (l)
I
I
~
Q)
~
e
a ~
! E-g~
:c 3: III .....
~ 3:Q)0)
o E.5
:c -g:~
Gl j'" 0)
~ E! ~
.c ,g.s2 0)
~ dlQ))(
.c l::... Q)
Co ~:j;-
r en::~
I
e
e
~ ~ b 9
,
III b b
en C\I r -!..
t') + + +
+
~ ~ ,l
II
~ .c -~ --
III
C
3: Il=
= 0 ~
:p ci
0 Q)
J:l .c ~
...
... ~
c: Ul
0 '0
.., ii !a
8 j J:l
"0 0 e
c: 0
III 2 a
~ 0 b
...
en Q) -'
:c C\I
5t ~ e Ul
t') r <
1
---:::: -- III ~I
:'
~ :. _J___
I --._-
~--
~
::'
;;;;:
:;;;;
~
~.
c
o
.-
+-'
m
>
Q)
Q)
..c:
+-'
:J
o
en
27' 2"
20' 0"
27' - 2"
-0-
north
equipment
room
e
e
~~~~
56' - O.
t.";fj"
l -.t,"~
elevator
ground floor plan
sidewalk
main entry
sidewalk
'\
"-J
I ,. ~;
-'"
~f
~
J
.,;, r
J
~
I '1".
..-:
'"
./
f
...
I
..
'"'
'"
f
.::; parking
,
~
....
'"
! .
~
;;
~ :1
'>",
J ',J' t~
~
..
~
,,).
.,;
~
~
1
~
~..j
..,.!
~
27' 2"
20' 0"
27'
e
e
-0- 1iiI3iiI!1Ihm~~~
north
-,
29'-0"
15'-0"
17'-0"
r
J
t
I I
I
Up I J
~ ,
~
.,
29' 2"
,
i
l
i
\
] ==
5.,1.....
~~~'~~r..
':1li1'
~ ,ffJ., k
Jj)1iy 16' O'
elevator- ,\
~ j 1
a J '..... ==
" ;;;;i
~
-~l '
,
j
,
29' 2"
~'-6" X 3'-6" window ,
(typ.)
......
~ , =
Up 1
-
2nd & 3rd floor plan
~
-
e
Keith Zayac & Associates.. Inc.
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture. Planning
101 Philippe Pkwy., Ste 205
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
(727) 793-9888 Phone
(727) 793-9855 Fax
keithzayac@aol.com
Dabiri Office Building
Clearwater, Florida
MODRET ANALYSIS
(POND DRAW DOWN)
and
Geotechincal Report
1:\Dabiri Office Bldg\Documents'.StomrWaterReportCover.doc
REGISTRATION # 55525
Feb 05, 2004
Alex L. Azan, P.E.
~i~
-
e
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED &. SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PROJECT NAME: Dabiri Office
POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area 2,600.00 ft2
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 1,216.00 ft3
Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) 3.00
Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base 14.80 ft
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 28.80 ft
Elevation of Starting Water Level 29.80 ft
Elevation of Pond Bottom 29.80 ft
Design High Water Level Elevation 30.30 ft
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.05
Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 16.00 ft/d
Factor of Safety 2.00
Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 24.00 ft/d
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.06
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench 1.00
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left Right
Groundwater Conb'ol FeabJres - Y IN N N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Impervious Barrier - Y IN I N N N N 0.00 I
Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00
Analysis Date: 2/5/2004
It
e
MODRET
TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA
PROJECT NAME: DABIRI OFFICE
STRESS INCREMENT VOLUME
PERIOD OF TIME OF RUNOFF
NUMBER (hrs) (ft3)
Unsat 0.15 130.00
1 1.00 1,086.00
2 8.86 0.00
3 8.86 0.00
4 8.86 0.00
5 8.86 0.00
6 8.86 0.00
7 8.86 0.00
8 8.86 0.00
9 8.86 0.00
Analysis Date: 2/5/2004
e
e
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Dabiri Office
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
00.00 - 0.00 28.800 0.000 *
0.00000
0.00 28.800 0.10085
0.09268
1.15 30.142 0.08452 0.00
0.02161
10.01 29.859 0.01726 0.00
0.01290
13.09 29.800 0.01104 0.00
0.00917
27.72 29.570 0.00812 0.00
0.00707
36.58 29.477 0.00638 0.00
0.00568
45.43 29.402 0.00518 0.00
0.00468
54.29 29.341 0.00430 0.00
0.00391
63.14 29.290 0.00362 0.00
0.00333
72.00 29.246 0.00
Maximum Water Elevation: 30.142 feet @ 1.15 hours
* Time increment when there is no runoff
Maximum Infiltration Rate: 3.293 ft/day
Analysis Date: 2/5/2004
Recovery @ 13.094 hours
e
1,200-
1,150-
1,100-
1,050-
1,000-
950-
900-
850-
800-
750-
~ 700-
-0 650
Gl
~
==
l;:: 600
.s
Gl
E
:> 550
0
>
:.:(
450
400
350
'300
250
200
150
100
50-
0
0
e
INFILTRATION: DABIRIOFFICE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Time (hrs)
Total Volume Infiltrated = 1,216 fl>
e
e
Water Elevation (II)
s: Z
Ol ."
x ;=
::E -i
Ol ::ll
~ )>
-i
m 0
15" z
< -i
!l!. 3' 0
0' ..
::> ~ )>
II ttI
"" ~ ~
0
~ 0
... ."
~ ."
n
m
Ol
<0
o
::
N
~
J.~,:H/UJ-J.1~'U tA4. 1;:IOiHU~U
DRIGGERS E~G.
ll!l 002/027
"
e
'.
REPORT OF THE
GEOTECH~lCAL INVESTIGATION
DABIRl OFFICE BUILDING
McMULLE!\ BOOTH ROAD & DREW STREET
CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA
O'-'gs;er:lj E'1;;;i~e"ring Servicell InCO'-POrated
I
~2/22(03 14:21 FAX 7275724090
DRIGGERS ENG.
. 003/027
E:lE!~i . .'
/~.,
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING
GEOTECHNiC~~ ENGINEE><ING I,d
CONSTRUCTION M:'TE~IAi..S TESTING
SERVICES
INCORPORATED
Pilot Construction Tec:-.c.'101ogy, Ir..c.
200 - glh Avenue North
Safet)' Harbor, Florida 34695
December 22, 2003
Anention:
Mr. Abdi Boozar, ?:esident
RE: Report of the Geotechnlcallnvestii:atioD
Dabiri Office Building
M~Mullen Bootb Road & Drew Street
Clearwater, Florida
Our File: DES 035023
Dear Mr. Booza!:
Pursuant to yo:.:r reqc.est a."""'..d authcrization, DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES,
INC. ba$ complete': 1he geotechnica:. investlgation at the subjc:c~ site. Presented herein are the
resui:s of the inves::ga::cn <?.10115 v.it..~ re:ommer.dations relative to subgracie prepa.ration and
foundation desigr. for~: a..ticipa:ec structurc. Also ::'lcluded, is a discussion ofpavcr.1ent
design consideranom.
GEOTECID1CAL 11'."VESTIGATION PROGRA....\1
STRLCTlTRE AREA BORl~GS - Plate I of the report attachm~nts identifies the respective
positioning oftwc (2) S!2.ndGId Pe"e'.:"atior. Test (SPT) bcnngs conducted within the proposed
builcing footprin:. T,.e borings we:-e ~xtalded to a cept..1 of 30 fcet below present g:ade
The Standard Per:ew-auo:: I:lethoc of sarr"pling was incorporated to o!Jtain soil samples for
visual classification Z.D: :0 cevelop pene'::"ation resistance data for use in evaluating [oU:ldz.tioll
requirements. Logs cf -i:..e Standa.--j Pe:::cration Test borings are prescnted in tile attachments,
to gc:her \vith a b:-J =f c.~_.; ptio~ of th:s sampling and testing technique.
SaraSOta
941 /~"1-33~::;
~.x 541 /37~ .E~eii
5i1rcftice Ci3ldrigget'5.~r>:: =m
Clear-wate,.
PC. 60x .7839, Clearwate.., Flo....i:::. 33768
1..22C 49::1'1 SoJ..t NOrUl. Claarwater. Florida 33762
727/~71-1313. Fax: 72"/~72~C90
::lYvOffiC~ cO d..ig;;jtil....s-.nljl. com
Tampa
813/!:l&.9-eD27
F;lIll: 813/!iil48-7645
tp~offiCf> ~ drigg.,....,,'i1 com
~ ,
II
12/2Z/0J 14:~1 tA~ Il7~7~~U90
DRII,;GERS ENG.
l{7,] 004/0H
e
.
2
PA VEMENT AREA. Two (2) classification Qr hand auger borings were perf01111ed within the
p:"oposed parking and drive areas. Each boring was tennillated at a deptb of 6 feet below current
grade. The classification borings p:-ovide !iamples :cntinuously from below existing grade to th~
completion depth of rhe boring to check shallow soil and groundwater conditions which could
affect paveme11t design a:ld perfornance.
DRAINAGE AREA . A single Double-Ring lmiltration (DRI) test was requested within the
;Jroposed drainage area. The DR! ,..-as performed at a depth of 1.5 feet below present grade. The
infilu;:;tion :est rate at DRI-l was mC3sured at 18 inches per hour. Care n1ust certainly be
exercised in the applicatlcn of in51:ration :est results ;:0 the design of drainage facilities, The
analyses of seepage infl:rc.tion :nus: indude a careful a5s:ssment of the permeability
characteristics of the s'.;osr.-atum soils, hyeraulic seepage boundary conditions and other factors
whic:l will influence j)ond Ciperat:ng :haract~ristics. jn this regard, the shghtly organic seam
identified at ~ depth ofabe'llt 3 feet anc. Li.e silry soil~ identified be:ow about 7.5 feet may tend to
,.hinder inmtration due to the lower per:neab:Iiry characteristics of these soils. The results of the
testing including the log of the bar:::; conducted adjacent to the DR! are provided in the report
attachments and located 0:1. Plate L
LABORA ~ORY CLASSIFICATIO)/ TESTING - A l1mited laboratory testing program was
also jlT.;plemented to aid 1:J cha:-acterizing the engineering propenies of the sub5urface soils. Our
laboratory tests includee P.'o (2) At,e:-ber.s Limits detenrjnations a."ld two (2) organic content
detenninations. TI:e r:s'Ji:.s dour j,bo:-atory tests are inciuded in the report appendix.
G.E!\"ERALIZED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
SlJBS1.:RF ACE SOIL COI\'1)ITIO:\S . Our progra!1~ of exploratory borings revealed the
presen::e of brown and g:ay ii:1e S~l:S 'w\'i6in tlle upper 2 to 4 feet below gr2.de. Below the
surficial sands: rhe bor.::g; enc0un:eree a 1 tc 2-foot ZO:1e. of dark brown fine sand with vafabk
organ;: fines content. Laoorato0' testing suggests an organic cono:em of about 4 to 6%, by
weight, whi:h is con;de:-ed margir..al jut ;Jot considered exceSS1Ve, Soils withln these upper
zorJes were represen:ed =;- L.'le SP :0 SP-S\1 Unified Soil Classificaion SYSten1 (USeS)
deSl~'T:Cltiol1. Beneath::.: crgani: Z('r.e, a ~"),o'wn fine sand with variable silt fines conteut
represemiD.g tbe SF> tc S~1. c.~sigr.a!i~n we:c: ider.tifjed to .. depth of about 10 reet. BelOW 10 feet
the bO:-:1lgS penetrHlcc g:ee::l C.rlc ~;;~ :Ia:.ey fine sands which t:a:1Sition to a sandy clay <lnd clay
below a depth of 2C fe.~:. 7he ::.iays CO:1tr:l,ed to the com;Jle:ion depTh of the borjng~,
::....i:;;er15 E-,,;iri:,,r-;ng Services Inco"'porelted
, . '
11/
~L~.'V~ .1.__ r^A 1./~I.iU~U
DRIGGERS ENG.
IQJ 005/027
.
.
3
Standard Pe:tetration resistance date revealed prin~arily a loose to medium dense relative
density within the upper sar.'ds ar.d clayey :;ands. The clay soils identified at depth exbbited a
firnl to very stiff consistency.
GROUNDWATER CO:\'DITIONS . Groundwater was encountered during the course of our
field investigation at depths of 5.0 to 5.6 feet below present grade. 1t must be recognized tbat
our investigation took pla~ during a period of minimal rainfall and groundwater should be
expected to rise follewing a period of more pronounced rail1f",n. Accordingly, based on our
review of the soil and groundwater conditions presem at the site and our review of the soils maps
published by the Soil Consenatior: Servlc.e (SCS), we wouid anticipate that the normal seasonal
high groundwater level should Otc',l: about 2.5 feet below present grade at t:le test location
within the stonnwarCT man<:.gemenr area.
Confirmation of ;>G:er:tia: s:asonal f1ucruatioli~ would necessitate installation of shallow
piezometers followed ~y monitorJ.l1g during tbe next.J,'et season.
GEOTECHl'QCAL RECOMMENDA TJONS
STRUCTURE TYPE. A:\'D LOADf,'\'G CO~"'DITIO~'S - rr is our understandi.:1g the planned
st.l"'Jct'Jre will consist of 51:lg1e-story constrllc~ion. 1: IS 2n[i~ipaled that the structure will
incorporate pri:nariiy load b~l:'lng walls with tbe pot:ntial for some isolated columns. We
would expect maximum Vi2.11 ioads C:l t.1C order of 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot wit.'1 waximur:l
colun1nloads. where presem, of less :1::au 30 kips. Further, it is anucipated that fill heigbts on
the order 00 feet may oe re~uired to establish design grad:s.
Should final des:g:: :cads 0: :111 rec:u.rer:1er.ts ex~eed these levels, t111S office ;:'ould be
notified so we may ::....i:.); our re~:::.m::r;dations.
FOL~'1>ATION CO:\D!IIO!\'S . 11 gen~ral, the subsurface soils are considered sdtable for
support of the plaane.e S::"TJ::nlre uti:izi!1f a conventional s:'allow foul1da~iol1 system. The loose
soils e:lcoulltered wi:2:i:. ~e '.lppe: 10 fee: co not pcssess compressibility characteristics whicJ
would produce signifc:>-::t se:tJel'!ler:t ween Subjected to the aforememioned fill and stn:crural
loading condit:ol1s A ::o:-:.ingl/,. s~a1Jo\l,- fO\..lI.1dations may be desigJ~ed based upDn an allowz.b!e
s(lil hetlring press-~re 0:9 t::l 2.500 ?Ct.:nd.5 per sc;uare f::lot Provid:d proper subgrad~
?re}lUrat:on is eJlact~:, '~';;l; founc.atons cesigned based upon tJu~ allowable sojl bear:ng p:-essure
c.-1Q~ers En;;lr"leering SerVk::g:;; Incorporated
Iv
1~/ZZ/03 14;22 FA! 7275724090
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 006/027
,,""'-.
.---",.~-,,-
.
.
4
should experience maximum total and differential settlements of 0.5 inch, Or less. Total column
setIlements ~boL\ld be less than 0 i5 inches
Appel1ded are recon:meIldations rela!ive to sub grade and fill preparation based upon the
resuhs of our geotechnical studies. Quality assurance compactio:'l testing during the proof-
rol:ing of the subgrad~ and subsequent fill lifts needed to establish finished grade should also be
conducted.
FA VE:\-lENT DESIGN COl"SIDERATIONS
ASPHALT P A VE:\1E!\T . Our geot~bnical studies have identiried sub grade soils generally
considered suitable for s'.l.ppoTt of the asphalt pavements. Subgrade preparation should consist of
st....ipping of the surficial vegetatioI"., r.,or zones and otherwise unsuitable material. The subgrade
should then be proofmlled \\-1th vibratory compaction equipment as outiined herei::1. Subsequent
fill soils needed to estab:ish design gra'des should also be ur.iformly compacted W at least 95% of
the Modified P:octor In2.XU:1umdr; de:Jsity A dry density of at least 98% of the Modified
Proctor maximum dry de:1sity should be acb~ved within the upper 12 inches beiow the
paveme:lt section.
The fine sand de;>osits er.countered rr.ay also :-equirc stabilization to improve w~e bearing
chs.racteris:ics :0 levels suitable for !he support of c:.. conve:1tional flex.ible pavement secti on.
EXFerience suggests 'Jm tn: fir.e sane deposits may possess Limerock Bearing Ratio. values on
the order of 15 to 20 Improving :he beaf.ng characteristics oftte fine sand deposits would
necessitate the nomir.al additlon of an adnixture such as lirnerock, crushed concrete. or shell.
Although specific paVement :hicb:5S design must be based upon detailed information
rel<ltive t.c traffic frec;ue:)cy and vehi::ular wl:eelloads, we have included a table depicting
typical pavement sedons corr.mocly utilized for parking and access drives for facilities oflllls
type. This is iitende.:i 1:.S 2. prel:u:lr.ary gt.ide and may require adjustment in the thickness of the
pavement structure to a~mmoda:e specific area uses.
:JriggGlr-. EnQinee:rlng Servi-:;es Incorporated
v
12/21/(i3 14: 23 fA! 72757Ji69o
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 008/027
.
-
6
CQNCRETE PAVEMENTS - Tile exploratory borings have identified subgrade soils which
would also be considered suitable for concrete pavements. We would suggest utilization of a
modulus of subgrade reaction, kJ, equa: to 150 pei. Also, it is important during the construction
stage to establish a firm unyielding base to prevent ruts in the subgrade prior to concrete
placement Peaks and valleys in the sub grade will cause the concrete to have abTllpt L,ickness
changes which could cause increased stress conce:ltrations and cracking.
DRIGGERS ENGD-'EERING SERVICES, Il\'C. appreciates the opportunity to serve
you and we trust that if you have any c;uestions cOlicerning our geotechnical recommendations,
YO'J will not hesitate :0 conte:ct t~e undersigned at your convenience.
RespectfuEy submitted, , ::.;; .:~'~ .
. ". ". . . ,I, ," ,.
DRIGGERS ENGINEERTh'G SERV~(!E~;t;N1~t.li~; <'., .
,~ ~~? f.. "'~.r. ~~ \;
,,'" ~.:~; ............... ...~ 11'''".:.
l~' ..~.~,.J~'~..~~\'
~ .,'!j': ,'" "I~~\:. 7", -:,
~ . '(I',j}.'; '~. ~ -:.
=~.:':',r,'>: .~., ,.,"; ~ :.
:: .,: . 'f. J:;'~I..;'~' .' .::
, ". . '~', ~
= "t1 : ..' ~ It '. . :.j.;, ~
~ _ ,,:. .' " .. ..t-! ~
"""~ .:~ .. ~J"';' ~ . .-.
~ ~.:.~ &.: :], ' - .".i:.., ~
.. . i. .\1' . 1':,.,. ~.
~.~ .... ...Jl,11II~' .-", ')'-'. ~~.
.. .'\~" .., . r{ 1"" ~._ ......." .T-
" ~ Ii.,?]'.)! ~........;.... ..'~ ....-" ~
,I', . 'f''!fN~' ;,.....1.~',. ~'\.. .
'..- "'lff!J.'! 1\1#tl.. ~i'" ",'. \
l 'If,'~t~~.....,~~'" .
-, .". ,'-
t
Wayn S Dri
Project' Engin r
FL Registration 1'0,58013
WSD/FJD:wsd
WSD- REP\035023
Copies submitted; (3)
::::i;;l;ler-s El"lgi,.,e."'in~ Servic~s; Inc:orporElted
. ,
VI I
, _ _ l~,;rnTCf;!.~~n: 2.1 FA~ 727572~090
DRIGGERS ENG.
~Oll/027
.
-.
~COMl\fENDATIO~S FOR SlTBGRADE PREPARATION
AA'D FOUNDATION DESIGN
SUBGRADE PREPARATION
1. The entire buildi.,g GIld pavement 2Ieas and for a distance of at least 5 feet beyond the
outside footing peri.oeter !bould be stripped of 2.11 surface vegetation, root zones, highly
org81llc soils and ot.1er objectionable mate...;a1. Exact depth of stripping shoald be
detemllned by E. representati-Je of the geotechnical engineer inthe ~eld. Excavations for
removal oftmsuitab:e material should be backfilled with compacted fill to match
surrounding grad~. Cut areas should be brought to grade. All underground structures and
~tiljties should also be id.entified and properly removed or abandoned.
2. The exposed sub grade may be unifonnly compactro using a vibratoryrolIer having a
maxirn.um drur.: weight of 5 tons i: operated at a distance of at least 75 feet from
neighborillg s:ructures. If ope:ated close.r than "5 feet from adjacent buildings then hand-
g~ided compac~oD equipI::leI1t having a maximum drum \vieith of 3 6 inches should be
incorporated tc help avoid :r~mission of vibrations to neighboring structures which
could ind~ settlements, A qucJj5~.d engineer or technician should be present dUril'lg
irutial comp~tbr. operatlO:15 to check pJOp~ compactor perfonnar.ce and compaction
procedures. The compaction should be performed au speed equivalent to a slow
',7.,'a1kiI:g pace. u.r: must be :xercised when op~rating the compactor in close proximity
to existing strucnrres.
3 Sub grade co:n~a...-tion should coosi5t of no : ess than !ell (10j complete coverages in a
cr,ss-crosseC pG~err. :n aCdition, c.ompaction should achieve a minirnu.:n density of no
less ~ 95% cf:2.leModilled Proctor maxixr.um dry density established in ASTM
D-:557.
4. The bo:tom of foo:ing excavations shall be c(lmpacted using a band-guided vibratory cr
impact compa::Cr with a :ninir:lurn plate width of 16 inches. Compaction should be
completed :0 ef~ a density of at :east 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry
density.
5. Density tests sro;)\l;:i be usee :0 co;:troi compac:ion. At lea~ one (1) censity.:;est sno\:ld
be perfonlled :0:- eyery 2,Cx)O ft: a~ a dept.1 of 6 inches below tl:e stripped. cornpac"Led
grade elevatio:-.s. ~o fewer tllr. t'J,'O (2) tests shculd be pl~'1J1ed. Density tests should
also be pe!'fo:rr:ed :n :he bc!t'm'l o~ selectee representative foctings.
x
------I11:'7Z7 U;j 1 4: ;: ~l'Jl.I I " I :> 7 "/. ~ U 9 0
DRIGGERS ENG.
~012/02i
ii.
.':.
2
FILL PLACEMENT
1. Fill required to develop proposed grade should be inorganic, clean to slightly silty fine
sands, free of unsuitable debris. For example, soils with 11. Unified Soil Classification of
SP to SP~SM would certainly be considered suitable.
2. The fill shoulC: be placed in li..'1 thicknesses not exceeding 12 inches for heavy compaction
and S; inches fo~ha.nd-guidec ~uipment wit.~ each lift compacted to a density of no less
than 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry densit"j. Thinner lifts may be required
. .
dependin.g upon compactor site and performance. Moisture content within the fill soil
should be cOn!!olled to wi~ ~2% of optimum as established in ASTM D-1557 to help
ensure deve:op~ent of both density a.'1d stability during compaction operations. No
fewer than six (6) to eight (3) coverages should he made on each lift using the above
specified small. \ibratory roller.
3. Density tests should also be used to control fill placement. At least one (1) density test
should be performed for eaci 2,500 ft.2 per fill lift. No fewer than two t2) t~sts should be
planned per fill lift.
FOUNDATION DESIG1\
1. . Sballow foundajo:1S ma)' be designed based on an allowable bearing pressure of up to
2:500 pounds per squale foot based u~on dead plus live plus wind load requirements.
2. We recommend a fcoting embedment of no jess tba."ll6 inches below finished grade, but
excessive err;be<i-n:nt sho:.1ld b: avoided :0 take advantage of the compaction process aIld
maintain the fCO:i!1g as hig~ as possible within the con:pacted structural fill.
3. Slab-on:-grade ccn!t""UctiO:1 n:ay be utilized. To ::naintain slab support, care should be
ta}~en so that all ex~aYations made fDr foundarions and utilities are backfilled with
su:table fill corr:pa.::ed ir. thin lifts "",it.1 a small compactor. Before backfill is placed, all
water and loose debris shou;d be re::1o"ed from these excavatioIls.
4. A column fooing width of no :ess :',al1 30 inches and a wall footing width of at least 16
inches is recon:=.~cied.
XI
____~l~J l~:~O tAA 1~IOi~.U~U
DI\l<.i<.it;RS 1:;1\<.i.
~ Ol:}/027
e
....
PLATE}- BORING LOCATION PLA.l~
::ri..ger:; ~rJine~r'jnc Ser'viCQS Ir,carparBted
'XII
12/22/0.'3.. 14: 26 FAX i275724090
-
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 014/027
.
5TA TE ROJ..D i 593
1iIIlI/J-07...""-'~
-,
, ....
,
,
i1!ijl~~ \
-0 VI x \
~~ r i ..
>[;; ~ e
cl ZI
O!1 0
;5 ~
~~ ; i
~~
~: ; ,-
U ~ ~ ~ ~
.. uo ~
~~.. .
"i ~ '"
z ~ ~
.,
6 .. :,
f"
~ I
'" ~
; '< ~
* ~ III
; ~
~ ~
~
~
<>
III
~
M .
~09
I
..~
CAD
Q.D.9. I W.S.D.
NcmttR
I
~.. \
t\l
. ift
I I
j
,~
J
r:,u n~l: fIl:\,,~,~.'ft',,",V-"''''I-''-;...oi.\V''_:u.c; ~. 1:'''/0)
SHErT TillE
PfoMCT NO.
BORING LOCATION PLAN
~, 035023
S~U:T NO.
PLA-E
X/I i'
. ~/22/03 14:26 FAX 7275i2~090
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 015/027
.
..-
ST A;."1)ARD PENETRA TIOI\" TEST BORiNG LOGS
::;ri;3erli Engir:eering 5ervice$ Incorporated
XIV
~~/~~/~~ !~;'O {^~ lZ7572tP90
DRIGGERS ENG,
141016/027
',"--l-"~
. DRIGGERS ENGINE~RING SERVICES INCORPORATED
Project No. DES 035023 BORING NO. B-1
PrOject DClbiri Office Burdino. McMulle!"\ BOoth Rd./Orew St. Clearwater, FL
Location See Plate r Foreman
Completion Depth To
Depth 31.5' Date i 2/8/03 Water 5.6' Time
...
~
~
A.
UJ
Q
o
.... .
. .....
.'IIl ...
"'_.-to-
....,....:"'.
5
f--......
i~.~n .:~l
f ~ ~~I:~:~
10 .......
~ ~~~>'.; I
~~~~; ~ I
'.:/;:%'
~:a~~
15 . ;j~J.}j
'k;.' i
~...y...'. I
1.~~,
;:f~;;
~
20 - ;i!~
I;./'~r"j
~a~
~:;:J;
V./:
2S~
~'
=0
~~l
Remar\r.s
B.C.
...J en
o W
CD -'
~ ~
(I) ~
"ci
zw~
OA.~
Cl)l:l::z
s:wUJ
o~C1.
..JalZ:
CD<O
CI) =
\l:l
Date 12/8/03
---
SOIL DESCRIPTION
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON Z" 0.0.
SAMPLER.14ij LB.
HAMMER, ~O" CROP
10 20 40 6080
I' !
I I I i
, I' i
I i
I I
I I !
SURF. EL: +31.3010/-'
Dark gray to light gray Fine SAND
with SUmC'al roots (SP)
Dark b'oVvr siightly orgar.:c.~jne SAND (SP)
Medium O~nse b~own Fir.e SAND (SP)
7/'14/12
... I I : i
I 1 I
I i
, ~ ! I . I
I
I , I
I
Loose brovvn sightly sil:y Fine SAND (SP-SM)
~r/
.A-/
i~
I
,
! I
! I I
! I
, i !
I ! I I . i
i I
5/4/4
Medium dense bro,^Tlish-g~ay sflghtiy clayey
Fiiie SAND (SP-S:~)
Mediurr oerse ~reel'1is~-9ray dayey Fine.SAND
(SC)
Medium cerise li:;lht gray s.ighUy cl"yey
to clayey ~ine SAND (SP-SM to SC)
711~/14
..
/
.('1
/ I
I / I
! J
[ \
\
11/6!9
4j517
Medium dense greer, c.ayey Fine SAND
to very stiff g'een sandi C_t..,y (SC to CH)
I
I I
I
II I;
, I I
! I
'1/12'11
i ~
i
I
: i
Very stiff to st'ft ~ree~isn-9ray CLAY (CHi
I
I
j
4!6!'11 ~
I
I / !
I I ~ ,
I I ,
I I
i I i
5:5/6 .
; I ~
I: I
II
Ii,
I' I'
: ~ !
I !
i i
, j
I
! j , !
,
Casing Length
'tV
12/22/0~.H: 27 FAX 72i572a90
DRIGCERS ENG. . .
"~
..I~~
DRIGGERS ENGINEERINGSERVlCES INCORPORATED
PrOject No. DES 035023 BORING NO.. B-2
Project Dabiri Office Building, Mctl:ulen Boo:h RdJDrew St, Clearwater. FL
Location See Plate I Foreman
Completion Depth To
Depth 31.5' Date 12/8/03 Water 5.S'Time
I
l- I ..J U)
u.. 0 w
:i -' SOIL DESCRIPTION
II) i
l- ~
~ >-
LU '" ~
Q
~';;tm
.......
"""
"', ,.
".;: ~ eo
--~~.:~
5
IJlilj!il'
1:!~':lji:i: ~
10i':~:..,!
;:n'.: I
V;.')":B~'
;.r.~/.
~::9.;';;
Zi0
':5~~~.
15 "".,,',
:.%..~.~.
.az
.~,;(.4
--- ?4:~
1.'~~!;
);2;~
~50J
. 20 (:%?
?7-?.~:;/,t I
--,./;;:
~<0 .
C?i~
/;1':7;
/.'/)t.
..;r.//.';~.
,.".., ."
r.'~;~~1.
25 (;';'/:.1.
~~~
~;.
30 .~.
Remarks
5~~
U)~z
s:ww
O~a..
...I:E1t
lD < O.
cnr
~
SURF. EL: +31,4+/-'
Gray Fine SAND with roots (SP)
Light gray ;:lne SAND (SP)
Dark broVoTi ;;ir.e SAND with rocls and finely
\divided o~can:c rr.ater;al' (SP)
Dark browT] Fine SAND (SP)
Loose iignt :lro'Nrl i=ine SAND (SP)
4,/4/4
Loose light g:-ay:sh-br::lVVn silty F,ne SAND (SM)
1/3/4
Medium Oense grayisn-b,o'rm ~Jlghtly ciayey
. Fne SA,.....D (SP-SM)
Dense te nec:um cier.se Iigrt gray
to light gr3e;;'s:,..gray dayey Fine SAND (SC)
9/10/13
15/21/11
4/6/5
Loase !Tee,": to ligh: greef1 clayey Fine SAND (SC)
0/3,'4
Firm g~r :L..AY {~Hj
I 5/515
i
,
,
3/3/5
lli017/027
s.c.
Date 12/8/03
STANDARD
PENETRA nON TeST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2- 0.0.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30" DROP
10 . 20 40 60 80
, I I
I ! i i !
i i
i
.1
I
"
I
i I
; I I
i I I
I
I I
I ,
I
I
I
~
......
.....
\ I
I ~!
//1
.//
:./
i
, I i
/ I i
I I I
I I I I!
. I ,
\ I I j ! !
!
, I ! I i i
\ !
\ . I i [ Ii
\ !
\ I I I
I
I I
j I I I
~ I
, I I II
f i
I' I I ! ! !
II I
I; , I I
f i I I
~I . i
i i
I i , I
I I
i I
i I
Casing Length
xv,
H..~ 2Vll;) H: 28 FA,4727 5i24090
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 018/027
.
-
P A \'"E\1E!\T AREA BORTh'G LOGS
::riGQer-s ;:"Oline~ring Services Incorporated
t .
'XVI!
~~f~~~V~ ~..~~ r~. 1~1~lZ4090
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 019/027
YECHNlC!AN;
Oabln O"fice BuHdir:ll
McMullen Boot., Rcao & Drew SlrBlt
ClllCl"lAfa\8', FI:lride
HAND AUGER BORlNC LOG
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATJON:
J.D.
1 WA T!R T AaL.E:
DATE:
'218/03
I TEST NUMBER:
..J
DEPTH g i
(FT) ! i
II) I
I 0 '.' ,.
j I:':'; ~ ....:
UWi
~
cji, .:'~:'.:.:';1
. .'.'
. ~. . . .
, i: ; : . '. :
Pilot ConSlrUetion
5.0'
ICATE:
~ _ 12/t!,'C3
- COMPLETioN DfflH:
6.0'
S&e ::l,ateo I
HA.1
ELEV,
(FT)
D;SCRlPTlON
REMARKS
30
Gray Fine SAND with sunicial rooLs
(SP)
Gray File SAN~ (SP)
S~r1ace Elevation: +30.6+/-'
I
1\
28 1
--~
I
=;;1
I
Dark brown organic Fire SAND
wi". iCOts (SP/Pt)
Darl< brOwn Fine SAND (SP)
Light brcwil ~:re SAND (SP)
I". ..
4 '.. ."
:~ /~~
I
I
..-
. .
. .
R" . .
. . 00
j .: . .
I .... " .
. .
i: :
6 . .
I
r I
i
I ,
8 -
;
I
I
i
24
22 -
i
-- I
I
- 10 ""
I I
20 ., W
I I !
i r I
I '
1 , I
I , !
~--: .. ~2 "
18 I ! I
! I 1
! I I
, i
~-j
14 .
. .
'tYIIt
J."fli...fV~ .I.'t...O r^'" 1..IQi':~U~U
DRIGGERS ENG.
l4J 020/027
PROJECT:
T~CHNIC;IAN:
LOCATIO!\::
EL!Vo
(FT)
.5'1
i
30 ~
t-----l
I
29 t
J
28 "1
I
27 .
I
26 '
I
I
I
r-~
I
,
25 I
I
i
24 ~
I
Dabiri OfTice Bu'lcl'lri
McMullan Booth ~a~ & :>rtw Street
ClearwaTer. Fiorio"
BAND AUGER BORING LOG
CUE NT;
JoJ.
Sflll ~:a:e I
O;S~RlPno~
Gray F:ne SAND witn roots (SP)
Light g~ay Fire SAND (SP)
Dark orown sh~:<tIy o.ga:'1,C Fi.ne SAND
','/:H' 'cots (SP)
Light browr",;s'~"ay FI:,e SAND (SP)
Li~ht brow'i rlie SAND (S::>)
WATER TAeLI:;
Prot Construc:lol'\
5.1'
I DATE;:
i 12/8:'03
ICOMPLEllON O~~TH;
6.0'
I DATE:
i 12/6103
TI!ST NUfIIBER:
HA.2
O!PTH
(FT)
'..J
i
~
~
Cf)
REMARKS
\,J
"I.., ._
:I.~~j,.::
\ . . . \
Surface Eievation: +3-; .0+/-'
r 1
I
I
:~/~~~~' :
r.,.::.:., J
. . \, 0 :1
.' o.:..;~ '1
.. .. oJ
.... "
': ::::
::: : ''"1'
"'. "
. .0..
".. .
': ::.::: 1
.0. .
I 2...~ ~,..
. K:: =""':!.:
...... .
i t.: :;-;.~
~----1':'~"''''''
i ~
-L:::: :
!:,".:." ...
3 .... 0
. t...,
t.', ..
, ,:: : : .,
. : .. : : .j
: :: . .' ~
f 4 f'>.l
8:~~:::~~"
", .....
:::: ::i
~~.:(; /=
j-l':::::o:
I r: ;",: "'-
I: :,: ': ,',:
I. .'..
I
! 6
! i
R
A
YVIX
~.'..{V~ ~.i~~ r^~ (~(~7~~090
DRIGGERS ENG.
l4J 021/027
e
.
DOl-aLE-Rl~G L'FIL TRA nON TEST RESULTS
:J~idger~ Ergw,,,,,,-;ng 5erviC6lii InCOI"pOru:;ed
yy
-..-..... ...- I.'""."VCJU
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 022/027
PROJEC1':
TECHN!CIAN'
LO~ATION;
El~,
(")
=1
~
28 -
!
,
26 ,
24 -
r--,
.f
22 -i
J
:
20 1
I
r-,
18 j
I 1
HAND AUGER BOroNGLOG
Oabi:; 01f;~ Bulldll'lg
McM~lIe' eoclh Read & Drew ~t'ee(
C!eeroNZter, Florida
J.O
See Plale '
OESCRWTION
Gray F:ne SAND with roots (SP)
Ugh: !inY Fine SANO {SP)
Dark orown slit,.: l:/y orga~:c Fine SAND
(SP)
Gr~isi'1-b~Gwr r-In~ SAt\O (SPl
BrO^T1 Fi:1e SAND (SP)
Light bro',v": sUgh!/y Silty Fir,e SAND
fSP-SMj
Lig!lt br~ sJ:y Fii,e SAND (S1.1)
CUENT:
Pilot Co~r ctlon
WATeR'rABI.E; 11 DATE:
5.5' 11n'm
OATi;:---~'-TilCOMPLETION O~Tk;
11121!C3 10.0'
TEST NUMSER:
!
DF/l.1
DEPTH g
(FT) !
I II)
" u f:' 'I. '.':-
. ~' :;;",,:-
E=ftT!;-1~;!
I : : ~~,..: .
: ',"::'"
. . ~ . , .
..". ".
I ~ . ~: : : .,
,~, 2 ',Y""i'i,:J
~
~- '. -.....
t.--:: .::~;
iE2;,~
- 4 .1; :: : : ~
~!:,:1
REMA~KS
Surface Elevation: "'3~ .7+/.'
~-:"!~I:~!
:- -I. ; ~.
:1:1; t I,!
:, :,:, (
.f~.~i:~~r~,
.1 ',I: I r
'r~: (~:.
n:ttl
:U:!.i.
) .'1,' ( I'
,",1:',
- iITITTrrT
I 81 ":[:1 II':
.i' 'I".
i i : j ~ : I: :
I ;:I:I:i:l:
I ill:,~ii
ilii:/I:I
I I I
" 12 1
R
r i
W
, I
.
. 6
,
i
xx'
lVlV1l3 14:29 FAX i2i57f~090
DRIGGERS ENG.
~ 023/027
e
.
DOUBLE RING INFILTRATION TEST
Job No: DES 035023 Test No. DRI - 1 .' Oat(l;
Client: f!iot Co~stnJc1iC?n
PrOject: Dab:ri Office i3ujici~g; McMullen Booth Rd & Drew St; C!earweter, =L
Location: 568 Sketch
Test Depth: 1.5 tt Outer Cyl. Olam: 24" Inner Cyl. Oiam:
Description of Soil at Test Depth: Light Gray Fine SAND
Depth of Groundwater B&:ow Test Depth: ;\. 11 Infiltration Rate: , 8
12/12/03
, 2"
lnlHr
I
!
!
I
,
I
i
,
,
I
25
I
i
g20r
;;;
a: 15
I i
I I
i~
I I
I I
I
!
I
I
I
.
I
I
.
I
I
Q.)
-;;
cr:
c
o 10
:;
1lI
...
:::
;;::
t::
5
i
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I.
I
o
J
~
J
4
I
-~
5
6
ElllpSli'd Time of Infiltration - HOURS
TEST PROCECURE: n.,e test ....as :orOI.l~e:n gerer21 accorc:ance with ASTM D 3385-75. A seven (7") in:;,
hydrauiic head was utilized. ihe :~r~~~:I~il r!~e was ~etermined al seected time intervals by recording the time for
a . inch drcp in water JewEll. The ~e~eJ"j (7") in(;h he~c was then re-estClbli!5hed l..ntil the next test inter\ieL The te:s:
was:;ontlnl;ed Ur,tl stability W2S e:;'":.e(8: an;:' ~'1e ir.f;~~atjor ~ale die r,ot vary in eXcess of e%
between succesSive one (1) 110L.:~ ':".ec:Sxer"er:~~. Re",dln~s were r'co~dej a1 inlerve's not exceeding 30 miroutes
Tne p;otted Wiitration rate ebo','e 'e:;,'csents :r.e avers.ce of 2;; observations during ea.71hour interval.
. ~ I ('//
Technician: J.D. Rev.wad by: L .J.\--......J I ,,--
U (f~
( .
Ky'/I
~~!~.!UV ~i;vV th4 1~7~7Z.090
DRrCCERS ENG.
laJ 024/027
e
.
srM:\lARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
:Jr'9Sders =ni;jlnww,..jng Services Inccrporaced
>(XI i'/
An~l!,lllUlltG
80R"~G OC'~"'I DI:SCRIP nON W'Y. y. G. I.I~n J'S ",r, tI.c. cot\" G,~. (JaG 1'" 0. SO. RES.
1"0. (," (pc I) (ur} (.-1.) (PP'"J {f1'!lJ) (Oltm-cm)
1.1. n, SI,
-~~ -----.
HI 1:l.U-IU' Urmilsll-bru..:n claye)~ r'ille MNO 30,6 ~~ Z2 ..
4<U
..-
e.1 J.J - 4.0' 0...1 "'...,ndighll}'orVn;cfi".:'>ANn 4.5
--
II 1 lll,O lU' (".",... d....f"~ "i"r So\NIl .HlA .'^ M ..
J4.8
.. -'- "---- --..- ,- -'--'--. '. - _. I- e
IIA.' I.X. 1." nlf" hu;II'....,C.,,;( hnc .~^NO ""Ih If'O(lU b I
, , ---. '- --.
'-'- ----. ~,,,--,_.- ----- - ~..- - ---- --,.-.-.-.. -- -~. - -
-- -.-- ------. --- n_ '- --
I
--------- --.--- -"--. - -- -------------.--.-------. -.---
.
----~-- - -~ - .
-~
~i
W~~
Y d(PC:f)
G.
LL
PL
SL
r 1', (ltf) N
lIC
><;:
;>.;.
-
",,'
SUMMAUY OF LABOUATORY TEST ID~SULTS
~
;.
"
t.
<J
- ..
...
<:
u:
c
o
:z:J
-
C'l
C'l
rI1
~
<n
trl
~
C'l
Walcr CIHlCclle
Dry DClIsi ty
Spc:cifK C.llvil)'
Liquid Lim;l
PIlls/Ie Linlll
(~UENT:
Pilo' Coostruction Technology, Inc,
C()A,
G.S. (fl~
ORG. (%)
O. (pprn)
so, (.wml
RES. 4"IIIIl-C01)
Co~soIidatilJn 'T c~1
Gr..jn,i~c },uoll";;;' (Ilydromcl<l.)
Ot-8311ic Conical
T otII Chloride
, T 04" SulCatt:
PROJECf:
Dabiri Oftlce Building .
McMullen Hoolli Road and 'Drew Street
C'carw:llcr. Florida
Sfllifllil.~r. Ltu..t
Poc--l:t"4I r("'.....IfVt,lu,--&N
L.b Rc.,j.I;,'lCY
See J est C\lr"'e~
rCI\:cul "..,illS N,,~ 200 Sieve
Uf.S 035023
<:)
N
en
'-
<:)
...
-t
.
\Inc...o..ed Con1'f'C~siol1
flU::
~~~, Vv .~.v~ r^~ 1,/~7~~U90
DRIGGERS ENG.
[4J 026/027
.'
.
.
METHOD OF TESTING
=r;ggwr:a 2-.,ir:e'!!ring 5erviceG Il"lcorpora'A:d
)(yv