FLS2003-12062
,
.
.
.
\
-
.
>-
CASE #: FL6 a!()DJ-/~O~r1-
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
~~~ft2eEt"EfJ=NT
NORTH:
SO~W'
WEf/tC I 8 2003
EAST:
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ~~~ eo
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN ~
NNING DEPARTMENT
OF CLEARWATER
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 11/18/03)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) \
APPLICANT NAME: r i2-A J:=.BEi2-5'~fL- / 0c.>d'~w\D PL~~\ C2i:l~ ~
MAILING ADDRESS: a-g 3 7 ~ ~12..;ot;, C.lf?A-Q.L;..)A--'"nS~. ~(A-. 3375?
PHONE NUMBER: 1077- 797-03YS;- FAX NUMBER:
'J:'12-f\ 1=, Bee. ~~ .
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
AGENT NAME: {-~Dltf e-tz..vIMD Ptpt,oGttA-f2:! - B. p. ...sC...I?~-N;;' f.AJc..-,
MAILING ADDRESS: &7os- A? m€?rl-dc)uJLJ{~ cte.. -; ~A ,FIt1 33b;ZS
PHONE NUMBER: g 13 ~ q(;)O . SC;9 Y FAX NUMBER: &/=5 ,-92<6.-.9/1 I
CELL NUMBER: ~13'. L/7 P -..32!? 2 E-MAIL ADDRESS: P CJ2 Irr, t:-i:!J t(;\...
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: c:;JR37 519-k ~G c:.:u:A-e.WA-'~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L g,-r--t9 k7D/2..TI-\-Lc>06b ~ 7A-Tli?~ -IIU~c..r I( ~ if PA;jG- ,5;-:3
(if no'l~sfelf'h'irrtf! a e note e ck'~to'n of i do u ent in the submittal) 3.2 " / _ / _ ~
PARCEL NUMBER: -2" '-/ep-- '-/<.pc-g.
'//01 Y /(PS I ::: IF; 150 ~,F. (0.4/6)
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): Po ~ C. L. 0 &o12t= DA..:J
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
PARCEL SIZE:
DESQUPTIO~OF~lli=.?iJ.S): ~L.u ~<-\: /..? U ~ n'- cl :5.c-Il b ~ etJ u. O.s,..h'lt:; Di'C"fl- CklJ./
AttJC~~ amne ~entifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application SinQle Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
e
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
/J(,. SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located. r-.._ ' , , _
\/6- .$\1\-~ ;c; I'? k . y - d Sc..~ Lb 0 F tTOWlG i 6
{ I
eC9C5l.E:t"'C:~ \..0 \~ l')\-G '2::;,brz..QO-~ -t-\.-.e>-M-G- ~
1
2.
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. n - .... ,- I , t
~ e.'Lec.... \ i \~ \).:> l LL Pd l ~ lV'-OG;;-Q., \ W\. fA Ie. /
0"- 'Dj.S. c..ou ~b TH-E::; Loe:...1>w-- L ~cJ e ~ f> ~Y\~l us.e.:;: D~ bALuE-.
3.
The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. kJ D l \1-\.'l-s c$ (I ~ U-( f+ A-LU ,V\ ( #oJ L; W"... ~ 0 0 L. G-rc LL bs;.. v f"U5 } l~ L L
SeLl 'JR...b -n+-e ~ 0 0 \..- " i=+.del v- <"7 ~A-F-f'~ "
4.
The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ---r"II' () =--
i1:!l.:.s 1"00 l.. F~C:-.Lo"Ou.ZL= L() LLL. c\.)1
'iT F-Fc-c..T IJl-+}F-{::t c.. W)-,"V7c-=..:ftol-..) ,PROP~'l I S po. 61....,C'~i <5 ~lL1l'j)t(;
5.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
'-[135/ Po 0 c... E~C.i..osu rle
~lv--l {ffi~E ~d t 5
t f0 Pt- b.eA i
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
ct0 (?~~~ P()OL~ct FolL ~ S.~')(E
6l 'W\.l LG-/.-. *'0 6i1--\-B ~ fbo L jE-K) c..LOSl. ').-2.E- S
tvn
c::..l+--A,0~ G-
\~
fW "-J 2.. ~
of
PDOC USe-- UT-fLC A
r;:'>c Pi": c-re- D..
o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
foo C f 1:>6&-l:::. P"rfLC ~A eX l~( ~ f ~ y bCl-\- t?f2- l,CJG.A-OON .Lo "- l1+b=
(E?i.:)c..i.a;()flE \1.':J~'(d. fCl,t./tf?.e t"::..- Oot-V\ PCg'Th /J2G: bCH Lob vF- nn:; P06L 5Th '1
. utj;-
1
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
<-oP1ZC5c::r { lth 6 P (lea G c..:I &.jh{N.::)SC::, It-\ G- Loolc ~J 1t\--c: use;..
. l=O Il- Tit;; f'P"'i'E12- T'-J '. T/t.;;~ FoR. ;.-=-~~~ I7+ii U~" b ol= nH;-
fu,lN\.6 vv- d A-~~ P~C-fO-fL/t ~
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Vcrs f14.l S ?~o,~Gc:..T t b ~ It)4LCS~ Y-o I2-t€ SI'I.-V'llB-
\ , , 4 I
~\ ~ 1 l-k> l-'-"'" 6 vV'-- d t' ~ ~ '6t S"ra-^. , t,U L 11+ b n~ ((PetpUL~
\J 5c- 5 i 10 T1ti;r-w.~,
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
ie e, 1\'--0"7
( {
StOc..lDSo~e7 s ~
r~ F 1~N\.,& S. llU
rz G"'.s I J tJV'lV I~ "-
~ t;;-
~.
o !:; (';:" ~.
f>rfl.. r f\
U &i2- 'i E3 t 1M- "\ L ge..
~E- "i r t~ A- (...:
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development. ........ 1::-.. .,.., \ 'h i.- ~ .
GS 11"1"1:' b b ~ LU t.. 'l:4- \ n-c- c-X.s
d ~~6 ti.l:)"D s i:;1-'~c. t~ V A-G
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
ye--S
L\'\' &'
1M ~ 'f oT7f-v~ f'to~1A E5
(-1---b DC; C> (;) A,-L>V g; ,
If-M e:-
.(>ooc.. ~L.t.-lZ~t; > f fH.8--/
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of parcel P!9Pos~.!?r d~velopme~and !,e City of Clflarwaier as a whole.
U-e.. ""-CJE.> "0 i 6- >c;~-:J 'd~
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
o STORMW A TER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
e
.
f F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
(J( SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
r:J'. TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
~ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
f1<.. SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
_ All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
. .
e
.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
D LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
I rrigation notes.
D REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 y" X 11) (color rendering if possible);
D IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
D COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
D BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
D REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 y" X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
D All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
D All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
shall include the street address (numerals)
D Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
D Reduced signage proposal (8 y" X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
D Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
c=-~9
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
:1\ ,A.D. 2~ to me
. --X\ h1- , who is personally
produced h_". 'Ut-. ~JL n ~
identification. \> % 2. 2-'?:ci...Y~o '-0
"\
\ f{ day of
and/or by
known has
as
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project-
"'''''''' JANENE L. CROSBY
t-\l.'(,,(/''',,-
'~'i\ MY COMMISSION #DD128147
EXPIRES: JUN 23, 2006
~a~Il'~ through Advantage Notary
Signature of property owner or representative
.
.
. r
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZ~GENT:
. :r:- (2.. f\ F . t:5e-e j E tZ.
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1.
That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
:r IZ.1\ f". 1S612.. ~ rE(l....
2.
That this property constitutes the property for which a reques. t for a: (describe requ~t) I .
N:X)) ~'~uRJ2 ~ -b b-U.J JA.
0\12)\ J2~~i'3t-I"j ~\ :-t:>r:~~-
/u)//€IZ.I1tfO PiAIJc./Mfl-/ n-d oil. 1'J?1I~11i /.I.. ~
That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: ~
3.
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6.
That (Ilwe), the "de"',oed aotho"ty, he",by ,e"ty thot the 10"'90'0' '~
@) .
P erty Own
Property Owner
Property Owner
Property Owner
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
STATE OF FLORIDA,
1\ Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this /7.u,
j)l~ ' '2-DO ")~ personally appeared . pL- f) L .
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
My Commission Expires:
f' )..
.................... TARI'r:iSC:StjCEt
Commission" DD111t11
ExpIres 1112Cl12OO1
FIorfcIa NotaIY MIn.. ....
..................H
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review\2003 FORMSlsingle family residential infi/! application 2003.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
",""" ..
.
~
ft.'!1 jtlO~ f)~ 17JliJ'
\ \ ,..... f',
\, U -."" \,i
() )-rJ)+
.~ ( 1. ...........1...
~...A......"""'..'........
~ - - ,j', \ - - - -
j~ ~2~ _'\" ".~-,,, ~- ,~
0;f
OR\G\~t\l
, \ ~)
FLS2003-12062
2837 SABER DR
Date Received: 12/18/2003
IRA F. BERGER
ZONING DISTRICT: LDR
LAND USE: RL
ATLAS PAGE: 233B
PAID
CK. NO. J. b '1 J
DATE 1~/13/oo r _
R.".. l:= (' ~ \.le D'
. L.""'J ~ V L..
DEe 18 2003
CL WCoverSheet
r<) ~ '0 '0 e-
o .; 0 <: .; 0 <:
0 ~ 0 <: 0 <: ..,
Q., Q., .e-
N N 0 = 0 = "
--- ::r: - - u
00 = V) lfl = V) lfl "
- '<t = ~ = ~ p::
--- - Q Q u
N e e
- N
< <
-; -;
- ....
Q '0 0
E- <l.l Eo-<
e ;.
'a:; I::: ....
<l.l V =
- <l.l 0 <l.l
- ~ en E
<l.l ... c:
Q = ~ ~ ~
z :s ~ C'S a
Q :;:;
1: =: I::: ~
...... .~
5
v N a.
.;;: 1.0 a.
N co
<l.l -
= '<t Q)
= r<) i:j
<l.l I
;. 0 '0
~ -
0
Q)
Q E
z a
e u
In .. :!::is
r-- = E a
= ....
~ Q Q) Q)
rf") U a.i:j
~ co a
= ....-
= .ern
= . co
Q 1-c:'O
= ~ Z ~ .Q Q)
= 0
0 - D::rot;::
= =
~ = Wu+:l
= Q - a.. = a
= QO v r- oc( a. c: '+-<
...-I v 1.0 0
= ........ < N I-g-~
rf") N ~ ~
= ...-I Oc:- ~
0 zco:=
= ~ en en"" 3: t:l..
en
M ...... ~ -.E::::l
~ C':l u
U Q en_a
. . ~ <: z -0.>-
::t:I:: -; .::.: U J: .- '0
I-Q)c:
..... ".g = ~ u co
C'S
C. = ~
~ co~
.... :"Sl
~
~ en .!a ~
~ = ~ rn.-
~ .g I .- >
- "0 ~~
Q. -
'C (/)
v ~ Q)
'" ~ .0
<l.l G::
Q ~
c:
U a
<l.l ~ ~
'0 (/) .2
Q a.
U Z
= ~ a.
E ~ co
- .!a
E- o
.. U ..c:
<l.l (/) I-
;., ~
'"
Q., a:l
N
1.0
0
N
-
I
r<)
Q 0 '0
Z 0
N Q ~
<l.l -= U
;,; '" (/) ~ ~
e '" ...-l '" ..r:::
U ~ .... ::?J u
<l.l =
-
- fa
<l.l
= ~
:s C'S
~
.
.
.-
a: .. ~
I&l 4 0 ~~.
!il Ii ~ ~~-&
51= ~ $!,~
~fit: ~$j~l~!
~ If~ S5!~~~ ~
l;.) 8 ~~lli~l
~;I fii:iii~
u ::It"".!
>0 ::3 ..e....
t:: ... II> 8 .,!
l;.) ii: -f~
-:-r-
.1
~
<( I
I") I
~... ~
.. .. ;;;;;
i! ~
$I !l
;7
! lil~ ~ t ~ ~ 0
~ tH"1"jl '<: 0 Ul
j :1JD11;';~; ti ... t-
,.
~ 4a:s.r~!$ . ill :J
O!oltll~'Oi tu ~>-
~E~r' hi H o:t-
U i '& -5 ~~ >-
! h..~jl! D 0 b x t-
bA. 0 0 0:... ... 0: z
dl!!!~il ",..: ZEEJ ... ... <>.t- Z ... 0
or z
. C C 2; ;=
1I}1[oa" ~i i ... I~ ..
'- 0: Z 0: 0 0: 15
j ~- tji " ... Ul :J .... t- <>.
! ca,,! i '1= j 112 ~ II> ~ ...... t- o iii
2~._ :U.!:a.. :z Ul 0:"'"
..:ii:j :> 0: t- CO Z ... ... ...
....-~~!- '" 0 < z 0 ,. ... ~ 0 z
Di:! )0. I-JJ! 0 0 0'" :z :J
U '" en 0 :J ...0 0 "
iJOi:~~j :i-8 Cl '" C ... ~
0 oiii ... ...
z 0 t- >- <t- o: >- z z
li!-.~--- 1i J & ~ ..... 0 t- J::> " t- O 0
~ ~~5H~ r .:S w II> ..... <:; UlO < (} N N
i1:~I; I '0 C> ~
H w I ~~ I
-all "~"b . @ ... I
~:~Jf:~t~{ .. 0 -l ., , ... . ~
.! ~ , ~~ :::s
H5~:dh~~ ,
"" '....1N1
~n~ { I ~ fmi- INn" ...., "il" i I" i I i/
iSV] nlII:l ... llDl:lTIH '\ Do
! !!!6J ~! ~! ~! ~ JiiiI~!,< I _ i I I i Ii i ~ ~
. -0; ~...,... N N ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
~1l1lNr.fN~911~ ::....~:t:l. <tll:a1:lt1:k::' I-~'" I''''~
~:; ~,,<tJ.~ ~t9G""""."! III u./I ~ nuN
""3/o.Y DN:llI iYIlO:) ZlIGll11 1: f----'= r=-
I . II ll. ~ <t ~ .......~ i II i I.... ~ ~ I ~_; ~
~ ~ ~;; g: ;; ~;;; ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ I :;; g:S at............. N 8 :!
: N "tal~
- ! N! '" i ... ~ "'s "! .. ~ "~ Do ~ e ~ ~ a ill 51 ill :;;.!- V -:; i ~
..",~- ~o:::
=10:01 i!:..........~ :,.., ..
:1 __ ~ ..- ~ _ _
f __d
.. I - ~ i I If i J
~ N " ~~ -
....
Y Ql1.Y:Jt'A '"
...
l(l
'"
N
.. --
~
il ~
,...
"
"' ..
...
.... .-
~ ..
N
.... j[ij
~ --
N
K "J-~~
j~L ~f( ~
10 ~I.
~
I;
DO
il
!e I~ I~
OOU__U i
...L.
OlIU-<.
-~
cr
.. '"
-i !
1
I
v I
'~u'"
:I:!~
!i ....
li!-
I "'_
I ----;;;:;;
IDI -@.- r
I~
1i5 '" ....,
I r-----
10~
.... GO
'----
I il
..I
Do 0
n-
I -
..
311Nl1lY
o ! i . . II ~ :! S ~
lf3 i ~~ :l-
N ~ ~
<I C\
-"11{- "
- N '" ... "'p" f c
! i i i ~~
31"11a\Y
.. .
~ ~ i ::
....
i i ;;! I :r ._ ~!Ii", i,,! Do! ~ ~
~ ~ N ~ ~~~. ~ e ::
~I-
i~D\\ ~-~ \\' " \ 'II'~
"I ~.l .. \" ! ~ ~
I ~ ~\~ -, :, ~ ,,~ ~
~ 'b~~N# ~\~~
~ ~~ "~ ~ ...,'" ~ \\,
I ~~ ~~~...", ~ ~: .~- :;; VA~.. ~ II
- """ ':.,~ IO~' ... \.\ - \"
~ ~ fIl;-1 ~ .~ 'i\.... " t::l,
~ "' ~ I "'.... ~ \ "e ~..
.. -... - .... \aN =
i i/:g.-. ~ ~ "" ~
~ ~; ;.... "'\ ~ t)i\- ---4 r-- ~ ~
gj r-. FRISCO ...., :.-- I ----.... -
li1 / ~ ~ \. ;;
:1 ~/e~ii~~
~K'%~ '" Ii:
a t'1 e--lD~~ ~ m
< 0:'" ~ II~~ i5
g z" - '"
~ ~ -;I;"\., J
~<(
<:IN
~N
..N
I/)~
...
......
"'~
Oi:l IGIIVS
~,. ~
;l; Iil
~
I ::-
~~ ~
~ f~t r- ~ ~
~ ..../1 f.... ~
:<lJf'" :!'
~
;; -
381' Ava UV3-IXQ:i
/~ i ::~~~ ~~ i:!
/ - -1-- - - -I--- --
~~~.oap~~~~~o5\
/. ~~'\. \;\.\ /<::--.:;:-----------...-...-...-,-:.-," \ t\
.'.
234A A
1..- '!! V ~-,
~~ "I!
il
-
3IN1 33111 _ II ..... N
J J . i)~ ~ I H;;;;c-
~I- ~I~ -I 011
0.0
00
w.......
mo
:>~
~~
CD
(/)1")
<(I")
-IN
1--
<(
i3w
,n. l= U>
'-' u~
Z ~I
Z ....m
O o~
..N
N~I
ANOIWlY
-nN
s" "'1(1...
'"
~
.,..
..
~
'-----
WN
Z..,
~
.
<(
to
v
~
: .. T i.
I II JI
...:i ..
" F.... ..
.i
i
_I~- ~
~
i
"
"<~"
" '
\\
\\
\\
\ \
\ \
\ :
: 1
: J
( !
il
: :
I:
. .
. .
,Ij
. .
/;
! i
\\
, ,
"'" \
\\
\ :
: .
. .
, .
~ / /
~ If/IfttII. /l
Q... ...... ,,/ //
~ l/l
o ~(
,., ~;; //1,'
? g~.~
~ 0
w ',\
;f \\
.....I \\ ~
\\ i
\ \ ~
\ ,
! i
: :
l i
//
/:
_//
"..;:-;":,//
I," "
I, II
/: ::
(-::,:::::-)( \::\,
(( "'~~\
\; \'t
\\:>.:::::=:::=:::::;;;p
.
~
~ rtIA ~
-----
~ ~-Lfi~
.
~ <(
v
~ v
N
'v'n:c~ w'"'
i /
: /
1/
---+---
.
.
) }- ~
I ~
I c.
I ..q
\ uJ
:r ----------
~
=A~e(..
/ ---~!~~--
" , \- '.-. ~'
, \
// \, \"--
u
/ ,..--. -,..
. ,,<.,.l r.. "'"' r~-
_(~// ~IL~.. .\.1_..."""-.,- I
.,/ .'
/"<
/
~
'I'~ ,I'
""olnl
_::. bAI.- ~E:SGLJt':l~N
:.."'" rS ....."'~~...'- P !-~..,.~~
~.,. , "J.A1' ~Ur.:... l' 1)4
...'''~.. ~t"""'1 r (.t. .:-~
.
cO ~
cO .
~
r: t
E i
tai
~ci.
U ,n -
-oU:
~ ~ f
~.r;;
j ~ !
r
o
:,,'
\.! .'"
~S
~-:->
.:>-
'JJ
\ll7
Ir
\- "'l.. 1\\
']'J
{, 7-
Iii ~
wi
~ L:;oc
\- \Y
e; U
c.. 2
<(<l
t:J
C'>.
'II
~~
~~lr
13~
- .,.~\
~:j
-.;0
_" C
j@
~~
- -;
~ \ol :, f
~
U
I',~'-r.
I
I
I
I.)
!~
...
I J
:..,...
"'-
"1~"'I~~Vt.-r
~I"'f:.. PLAN
......-
i..... "
I -
20:\0(;
tAlHttAUM
GUIu"UlC !:TeACK
- FRC~A - I
:l'"lIE~ R.o.lo". ~ /,J t
SIDE /0
o
,IIY/'W/
J-:7.JfI
/BJlQ
~'Rry.~
! .",~'''''/J!J
~~:::'~;>~~~,,~~Pr_
-''tell'
~'~'~r"
F<B I 5 '988
,;: / I ~ 1/ [/L ..'- '.
~~.~ l-~"f--(/J"'/f< " \.1" \
rrj$5/
.
.
J
'6'3Q-E(P&f)
I
de
",
lO"E(P&r)
~t:,~T l:::ll.-,~.~.Ry ~'...(
(fi . or '6
8"'~';; (,-i" 9(ARtft4C'i,'I
,
231.~3'(P&r)
BlCl()( .~(
~C ~c.~ l~
f C\.;..o -w. C\J T
C'''' CQft4C S/ft
:.. .\;'
0
i ,
~ . rl
,
riR ~/r I
..Ie I I
I I
,
I .A ,
! I
~--_...
/'
/
~'1 t
I'
z
o
:::0
~
~
\.
\ "
\~-'<. "
1,--- )
{ /~ / /
j!/
.'
~
I
---;;:-
"
i I
m
I '
,
i
GRAPHIC
~o
( I!I rUT I
1 incb = 20 rt
04-11-114
04130SYI
~
~
"-
Q:
b
'" v
~:,;
~?
,.~ .............
,.-,
Q. 1""
~t\:,')
~ "';;
~
.,'
Ql
-<
If)
c 'i;o/~
0) RADiuS
ARC
CHORD
BEARING
DELTA
o RADIUS
ARC
CHORD
dEARlNG
DEL T A
i310.00'(P)
110. n'(?)
110.64'(P&f)
S83'35'05-ECP&r)
0T49'~~-(C)
810.00'CP)
20.80'(P)
20,80'~Pl<f)
N88'411-W(P&f}
01 "28'17-CC)
LOT 16
. '.:,...;.;..' ~
"'-")()
'L'~' ~
\ ,
21S.69'CPM)
. '-----
L~---~
!I
! :
!
II
'I
I,
: I
... ::f"-::::S ~O' CR.e..........(.f ,u..n v'..i~,~'( F"'SE""r~1
SURllt:v NOT
VAUO UNlESS
:ilGNffi AND
[r.tBOSSED ~1li
SURllt:YOR'S
SEAl
;<"
iwfARPER, KYI\JES GELLER, WATSON &. 5tJrCr-.='. P":'.
ROBERT WRIGHT COf\PORATION
PaOffSSlONAl lAND ~VEYINC
lU" U STlflT NOIlTH Iln) 5.JO-JO~
C:.lUWAT~. flOl:IDA 1461O tin) nO-ll1] F"X
""'--
&.cl;
." .
1
~~
~,RW: .
, C.-
~/
)5 OF
'0'
~/! /
/:/ . J 'i:::
'7 ,'I r _
/; V-/f3> "(~
/~ / . .
.
SECTION 2!..-. TOWNSHIP .!!-S., RANGE l~ E.'plNELLAS
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
.
-, ,-
...j. ~,
-" '"
';-'0
FIR
S.sq.5S'32HE.
,,,,
/10.00'
I()'~.; v't"L.. rSM'r
/VOTE:
BASIS OF BF:ARING
's AS5VMICO
~I
/00 I
I
I ~
~
!- ~
t
~
\!
Cl
C'
~
LOT
5/
-~
~
"
It
'5/ I
~
"
!l
~
I
I~
II)
r
~
I~ ~
I! ~
~r
I
I ;
i 360' 'fir ~
1::. '1 ~
~t____ l~ I ~
I -v. :>s- 'O'.O::;;;-;~~ J
. ~.3 Os" .........__
~o ~
-~. ",>. //~~7'
-". ..... ~ I '.
f/~~
.~
~
OJ
4. f~c<;
J ~Jj
. ",':(<P ('. .-
../...... j
~~.Jl~li3iB.S.
o
.;
..
:77
,-' I
N
SC10Lr '''30'
c.'" L)
,~
ZONING
M NI M
BUILDINC SETBAC:<
- FRO~ /'
STREET R.O.W.~
SIDE /d
REAR / (J
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SURVEY Of LOT 50, NOR!HWOOD ESTATES-TRACT G, ACCORDING TO TIlE PLM TllEREOF Ai RECORDED IN
PLAT BOOK 79, PAGE 55. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS 0' PINELLAS COUNTY, fLORIDA.
.lOB NO.: 15129 ~
GEORGE A. SHIMP II.
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNERS
3211 U.S. ALT.19- SUITE B
PAL M HARDOR, nORIOA 33~63
PIlIJUr.7A4."4'lo;
PREPARED fOP.: WILLIAM L. LYMAN
PREPARED fOR. IlARNE TT BANK OF P INfLLAS COUNTY
CERTIFICATE: ..e ,v_vU ...acu_"e ....... -II' ,... ItUIIIIV"
a..V,a,M'.', ., e....'c. It..... ,,,..... .................., c... ,.
hll 0'" Of' .., ....\...t .... en,ll',
// ,A //1c~
~..~~
DATE '1/20115
GEORGE A. St'IMP II, f'L^. REG. SURVEYOR NO. 2"2
(NOI .H'D UNL(SS I"OOSSIO WIIH SIAL I
----.;
..::Ti # /'PUN/AI"'"
.~
-
(f). 8PsJ.
@...,;,.
/!) ,,~--e{'F,=*
c:::::::::;:J- "":'" ~ ..".,.. --' --
_ .~J;.....
of .0""0 41)
,II' <v ~/
(l I ~
e
(!)
Co"
-v'.
-.
~eE~ P~'~c.
(f}
.
.
. lflfll1f.n;--.6'~.......;
e~-ro ~M. OF T/f/)f-
~{~ ~"'--'-Q-~C'#~. ,..k...
,~,,1' I ~.{"~-;.
~c:i(.. \ I <J'~1';1f1' ~ ~
.~C":J.. ~_/\_~~~
iIlir:: -. ==-- ,.....Iii
..~- =- . ~~
,.....:~ -==- ~~
~~~~.{~l
"'#"'~~lm':I"..
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUilDING, 100 SOUfH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
February 4, 2004
Mr. IraF. Berger
2837 Saber Drive
Clearwater, FL 33759
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-12062 at 2837 Saber Drive
Dear Mr. Berger:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On January 29, 2004, the Development Review Committee (ORC) reviewed your
application for Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the side (east) setback from
15 feet to 10.3 feet to a proposed screen enclosure over an existing swimming pool deck, in association
with a single-family residence, under the provisions of Section 2-103.A. The DRC recommended
approval of the application with the following bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Detached Dwelling per
Section 2-103.A.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development. The approval is based on and must adhere to the
site plan and application dated received December 18,2003.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (February 4, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT Ht\J\llLTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BU.I.JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
February 4, 2004
Berger - Page Two
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review
Specialist, at 727-562-4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website:
www.c1earwater-fl.com. * Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Departmen^C D B\Standard Fler.Pending Casei13 - Up for the Next DRC\Saber Dr 2837 - Berger (WR) - ApprovedlSaber Dr 2837
Development Order. doc
10:00 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-1206:As37 Saber Drive
Owner: Mr. Ira F. Be.
Applicant: B.P. Screens, Mr. Guillermo Planchart; 8705 N. Meadowview Circle, Tampa, FL 33625;
telephone, 813-478-3282; email: bpscreens@tampabay.rr.com
Location: 0.42 acres located on the south side of Saber Drive approximately 500 feet west of Sundancer
Drive and approximately 1000 feet south of Enterprise Road.
Atlas Page: 233B.
Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Standard D'evelopment approval for reduction to the side (east) setback from 15 feet to
10.3 feet to a proposed screen enclosure over an existing swimming pool deck, in association with a single-
family residence, located at 2837 Saber Drive, under the provisions of Section 2-103.A.
Neighborhood Association: COUNTRY PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, PO BOX 15242,
CLEARWATER, FL 33766; SCOTT GRUTCHFIELD, telephone: 727-726-4135; email:
dgrutchl@tampabay.rr.com
Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist.
.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, John Schodtler, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
12. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
13. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
14. Traffic Enl!ineerinl!:
a) No Comments
15. General Enl!ineerinl!:
a) No Comments
16. Planninl!:
a) No Comments
17. Solid Waste:
a) No comments
18. Land Resources:
a) No Comments
19. Fire:
a) No Comments
20. Environmental:
a) No Comments
21. Communitv Response:
a)
22. Landscapinl!:
a) No Comments
NOTES
Development Review Committee Action Agenda -Thursday, January 29, 2004 - Page 6
...
.
.
DRC Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Time:
Applicant:
Address:
January 29, 2004
FLS2003-12062
DRAFT
Mr. Ira F. Berger
2837 Saber Drive
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the side (east) setback
from 15 feet to 10.3 feet to a proposed screen enclosure over an existing
swimming pool deck, in association with a single-family residence, under the
provisions of Section 2-103.A.
EXISTING ZONING:
Low Density Residential (LDR).
EXISTING LAND USE:
Residential Low Classification (RL).
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES:
North:
West:
East:
South:
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Single-family residential and nursery (county)
CHARACTER OF THE
1M MEDIA TE VICINITY:
Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The 0.42 acres located on the south side of Saber Drive approximately 500 feet west of Sundancer Drive and
approximately 1000 feet south of Enterprise Road. The site is zoned LDR, Low Density Residential District and is
located within a single-family residential subdivision. The site is an internal lot and contains an existing square-
foot, two-story, single-family dwelling.. The site has an existing in ground swimming pool on the east side of the
property. The pool deck is setback from the property line 10.3 feet. The primary residence is also setback from the
property line 10.3 feet.
The proposal includes constructing an aluminum swimming pool enclosure over and existing swimming pool deck in
association with the existing single-family dwelling on the east side of the house. The house and swimming pool deck
are presently set back 10.3 feet from the side property line on the east. The applicant proposes the addition at a side
setback from the east of 10.3 feet. The Code requires a minimum 15 feet side setback. The applicant has submitted
surveys from various lots within this subdivision verifying side setbacks between 10 and 15 feet. The applicants' own
house is set back 10.3 feet from the east property line. When determining the community character regarding setbacks,
Planning staff has relied upon verification of similar setbacks within the neighborhood, and not in a particular
direction.
Three homeowners within this subdivision have submitted letters of objection to the proposal. It has been discovered
that there is some confusion of the location of the applicant's property. The three homeowners who object believed
the applicants property to be at 2437 Saber Court instead of 2837 Saber Drive. They were all sent a clarification letter
and map and I have not heard back from them as of this date.
S:\P/anning Department\C D B\Standard F/ex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Saber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR)\Saber Dr
2837 Staf/Report.doc- Page 10f6
.
e
.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-
913) and Residential Infill Project criteria (Section 2-103.A) have been met.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
STANDARD REQUlREDI EXISTING PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
PERMITTED
MAXIMUM One dwelling unit One dwelling One dwelling unit Yes
DENSITY unit
IMPERVIOUS N/A N/A N/A N/A
SURFACE
RA TIO (ISR)
LOT AREA 20,000 square feet 18,150 square 18,150 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH 100 feet 100.7 feet 100.7 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT 25 feet 28.5 28.5 Yes
SETBACK**
REAR SETBACK N/A N/A N/A N/A
SIDE SETBACK 15 feet 10.3 feet 10.3 feet Yes
HEIGHT N/A N/A N/A N/A
(maximum)
PARKING Two spaces Two spaces Two spaces Yes
SPACES
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-103.A):
1. The parcel proposed for development is a
corner lot or is an existing lot;
2. Structures located within the side and rear
setbacks otherwise required in the LDR
District are used only for accessory uses
such as a swimming pool;
3. Structures within the side and rear setback
otherwise required in the LDR District are
buffered with landscape material and fences
to protect the privacy and value of adjacent
properties.
Consistent Inconsistent
[X] [ ]
[X] [ ]
[X] [ ]
S:\Planning Department\C D BlStandard Flex\Pending CasesV - up for the Next DRC\Saber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR)\Saber Dr
2837 Staff Report.doc- Page 2 of6
.
.
GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
Consistent Inconsistent
1.
Development of the land will be III
harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage,
density and character of adjacent
properties.
[X]
[ ]
2.
Development will not hinder or discourage
development and use of adjacent land and
buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
[ ]
[X]
3.
Development will not adversely affect the
health or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
[ ]
[X]
4.
Development IS designed to mllllmlze
traffic congestion.
[X]
[ ]
5.
Development IS consistent with the
community character of the immediate
vicinity.
[ ]
[X]
6.
Design of the proposed development
mllllmlzes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts on adjacent properties.
[ ]
[X]
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on January 29, 2004.
The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to
the side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet to a proposed screen enclosure over an existing swimming pool deck,
in association with a single-family residence, under the provisions of Section 2-103.A.for the site at 2837 Saber Drive,
with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project per Section
2-103.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability Criteria per
Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRClSaber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR)\Saber Dr
2837 Staff Report.doc- Page 3 of 6
.
.
January 23, 2004
B.P. Screens Inc.
Mr. Guilermo Planchart
The following are comments generated from the preliminary Development Review Committee
on December 19,2003. Please be prepared to address these and any other comments generated at
the scheduled Development Review Meeting for 2837 Saber Drive on January 29,2004 at 10:00
a.m. The city requests that yourself or a representative be present for the Development Review
Meeting at 100 South Myrtle A venue in Clearwater, FL on the second floor of the Municipal
Services building. Please call and verify your time with Sherrie Nicodemus at 562-4582. I look
forward to meeting with you.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic Em!:ineerin2:
a) No Comments
4. General En2ineerin2:
a) No Comments
5. Plannin2:
a) No Comments
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments
7. Land Resources:
a) No Comments
8. Fire:
a) No Comments
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Communitv Response:
a)
11. Landscapin2:
(a) No Comments
.
.
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case No.--F LS 02D03 - l ;:L()" ~
,r-;-
Meeting Date;J CL~ 2- 1 . Z C)(,) L("
I
Location:
d.837
.s~
o Current Use:
o Active Code Enforcement Case (no) yes:
o Address number (yes) (no) (vacant land)
~
'i\el
o Landscaping (yes) (no)
o Overgrown (yes) (no) (\ 0
o Debris (yes) (no)
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (no)
o Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing (none) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
o Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes) (no)
o Residential Parking Violations (yes) (no)
o Signage (none) (ok) (not ok) (billboard)
o Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed)
o Outdoor storage (yes) (no)
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
D81&./(23/0<( Reviewed by: G'e-rrUb 'fc~ Telephone: '-{? 2- 7
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
January 5,2004
B.P. Screens Inc.
Mr. Guillermo Planchart
8705 N. Meadowview Circle
Tampa, FL 33625
Mr. Ira F. Berger
2837 Saber Drive
Clearwater, FL 33759
RE: FLS2003-12062 - 2837 Saber Drive - Letter of Completeness
Dear Mr. Berger:
The Planning staff has reviewed your Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the
side (east) setback from 15 feet to 10.3 feet to a proposed screen enclosure over an existing
swimming pool deck, in association with a single-family residence, under the provisions of Section
2-103.A.. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the
application is complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on January
29, 2004 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle A venue in downtown
Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than
one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You
or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee
may have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727.562.4604.
Sincerely yours,
~.~
J o~ Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\PIanning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Saber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR)\2837 Saber Dr complete
letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOrT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
. .
.
.
Albert & Patricia Rosati
January J2, 2004
Mr. John Schodtler
Developmentkeview Specialist
City Of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater,FL 33156
VIA E-Mail: john..$choQtl~@mydearwater.com
RE: Notice of Filing of an application for Flexible Standard Development Approval at
2831 Saber Drive (FLS203-J2062)
Dear Mr. Schodtler:
I received yournotiee of January. 06,t004 regarding the above application for a variance
of the setback of the above property. I do abut the above property, and object to a
reduction of the setback. Setbacks are designed for aU hottleowner's property value
protection. I am sure the owner of the above property would not want me to build within
10.3 feet oftheirpropeny. The ttlainrea.son wepurchued our home here was the .back
limits .of the property. I could list ataundry list of other reasons, why I do not want the
setback limits changed, h()wever I will defer. I am sure the owner of the property can
adjust the size of the pool deck to accommodate the existing setback without any
architectural or ae$thetic inconveniences.
The City of Clearwater needs to deny this variance to protect the value of 0..... homes. We
do not need the setbackproblettls like the City has created in Clearwater Beach and other
areas over the years. If one homeowner is granted a variance it opens up a Pandora's box
of future requests.
Mr. Schodtler, please fonnaltysubmit these comments to the full review board. If you
have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at my office at 121-112..0816.
Sincerely.
2424 Sundaooer Drive. Clearwater, FI 33159' Phone: 727.712.()816. arosatifttamobaV.rr.com
"
"
.
.
Schodtler, John
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Albert Rosati
Albert Rosati
RE: 2837 Saber Drive (FLS2003-12062)
Dear Mr. Rosati:
Thank you for your interest in the above mentioned setback reduction case.
I would like to clarify the applicant's request. They are asking to build a pool screen
enclosure over their existing pool deck (10.3 feet from the side property line) and will
maintain the same side setback as the already existing home (10.3 feet from the side
property line). The reason for the variance is the City's Land Development Code has
changed considerably since the neighborhood was developed. It was originally developed
with thirty foot front setbacks and ten foot side and rear setbacks which is visually the
characteristic of your neighborhood. The Code adopted in 1999 now requires a twenty-five
foot front setback and fifteen foot side and rears setbacks.
The variance review process is based on how the proposal is characteristic to existing
development in the neighborhood.
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Rosati [mailto:arosati@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:34 PM
To: Schodtler, John
Cc: Albert Rosati
Subject: 2837 Saber Drive (FLS2003-12062)
See attached letter
Thank you,
Albert Rosati
1
...
r
..
.
.
LL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
o
>-
I-
u
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
January 22, 2004
Mr. Albert Rosati
RE: APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2837
SABER DRIVE (FLS2003-12062)
Dear Mr. Rosati:
Thank you for your e-mail dated January 12, 2004. I would also like to acknowledge our telephone
conversation. Due to several of the homeowners calling with interest in this proposal and the confusion of
the location of the property I have provided a map indicating the applicant's location.
I would also like to clarify the applicant's request. They are asking to build a pool screen enclosure over
their existing pool deck (10.3 feet from the side property line) and will maintain the same side setback as
the already existing home (10.3 feet from the side property line). The reason for the variance is the City's
Land Development Code has changed considerably since the neighborhood was developed. It was
originally developed with thirty-foot front setbacks and ten-foot side and rear setbacks that are visually
the characteristic of your neighborhood. The Code adopted in 1999 now requires a twenty-five foot front
setback and fifteen-foot side and rears setbacks.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through
the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com or my direct email address at
iohn.schodtler@myclearwater.com
Sincerely,
John Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:IPlanning Department\C D BlStandard FlexlPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Saber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR)\Letler to neighbors. doc
J"
, "
.
.
.
.
.
.
"
.~
5
....-
.
e
jJ,\N 2 0 2004
January 14, 2004
Mr. John Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
City of Clearwater - Planning Department
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
RE: Development Approval at 2837 Saber Court (FLS2003-12062)
Dear Mr. Schodlter,
I am in receipt of your letter dated January 06, 2004 in reference the to the
aforementioned property. I live directly next door to the subject property to the
immediate southeast. I thank you for allowing others and myself within our
neighborhood to have a voice in this process.
To start off I would like it known that I am vehementlv opposed to allow the
property owner of 2837 Saber Court a reduction to the setback as requested.
Myself and others within our neighborhood purchased our homes in this specific
neighborhood because of the large lots sizes, the separation between homes
and the amount of green space within the neighborhood. This was achieved due
to strict enforcement of the setback regulations and the original builders
sensitivity to the balance of the neighborhood. Our community is one of only a
few within the City of Clearwater with this amount of separation between homes.
I am very surprised the City of Clearwater has already allowed the prqperty
owner of 2837 Saber Court to add the building structure presently under
construction! This is the second time this property owner has added to their
property in the past 6 years. At this point the property owner has all but built up
on all the green space he once had. This is caused myself and surrounding
property owners to have great concern about our individual property values, let
alone dramatically changed the view out the windows of our homes. We now
have a home that is not in keeping with our neighborhood and appeari to be
encroaching on our property. We are now faced with "zero lot lines" within our
neighborhood. Allowing a variance to the setback would only exasperate the
situation.
.
.
page 2
In addition, once a variance such as this is allowed within the neighborhood a
precedence is establish for others to request and be allowed a reduction in he
setback. I have seen it happen in other neighborhoods. I would hate to see this
happen to this unique neighborhood within Clearwater. I encourage you to drive
our little community of three streets and see first person the amount of green
space we all enjoy separating our home.
Thank you again for allowing us a voice in this process. Again, we are opposed
to the proposed reduction in the setback.
~Sin~:!. '
.....7_______
/ \
sett an Andrea Tyler
2 6 S er Drive
CI ater, Florida 33759
.
.
LL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
o
>-
~
u
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
January 21, 2004
Mr. & Mrs Scott Tyler
2856 Saber Drive
Clearwater, FL 33759
RE: APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2837
SABER DRIVE (FLS2003-12062)
Dear Mr. & Mrs Scott Tyler:
Thank you for your letter dated January 14, 2004. The property requesting the variance is 2837 Saber
Drive, which is located on the south side of Saber Drive approximately 100 feet west of your property. I
believe there is some confusion about the location so I have provided a map showing the applicants
location.
I would also like to clarify the applicant's request. They are asking to build a pool screen enclosure over
their existing pool deck (10.3 feet from the side property line) and will maintain the same side setback as
the already existing home (10.3 feet from the side property line). The reason for the variance is the City's
Land Development Code has changed considerably since the neighborhood was developed. It was
originally developed with thirty-foot front setbacks and ten-foot side and rear setbacks that are visually
the characteristic of your neighborhood. The Code adopted in 1999 now requires a twenty-five foot front
setback and fifteen-foot side and rears setbacks.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through
the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com or my direct email address at
iohn .schodtler@myclearwater.com
Sincerely,
rtv~+\.-.-
J olm Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:IPlanning Department\C D BlStandard FlexlPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Saber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR)\Lelter to neighbors. doc
r
""
0::
IZ:! ...
~ ~
;E:
!j o~
u ':8
~51
t:: II.
U
.t
~
...
<t:
t'}
N
Nt:
~ GO ~
~ ;, \-
~ i [ ~~~l
r- I.- '" ~ y- m
r- II!~ n:vl "3:
!- 5l.uG" ::
i- ~~~i~!~:;
I-- I to flHZ
r- I --;;;;;
I ;; ~ N '" ,,~on~ '"
r- IIl-;r-PS -I ~ ~ ~ ~ !
r- I~
liS '" ...., 0 U
f- 1- N ..
I ~: - i N ~ "'i "1
~ ~~~
~ ~II
&; ~~
~oi~ ~
~~j:!!1
wU _
{9~i~!
~~~ ! ~
~ ~!.!
::J tn~'":':-
~ ~f~
I
I
..:
r-
r-
.
Bt~i~ ~t ~
~ ~~ b.~~~~ Z
~:j:'ir~~~
o~-;ijtio';i1:
~E,j;l!u'~~n
U'O.g.j'OUii(j li
~ 151- loo,:!': i
:. 0.1 0 Di.~- ~
As~l!i25"!
111~-:~$.!~
!~:; :il~L]
2~i:5 .. !~~ :.
~~~~~.i~~j2
Sr~~~;~~i:
~i1!!i~~ :i
~:is~i~iio
ifl':]~r;~ a=
uu;J"ii:~o~E
~~ll~~~tfti
"
~
ti
~~
~ ~
...!l
tA.
a..~
.5"
~i~i
1li~
:~~
H
::(~
SE
~ "
~:;;
~
co
co
zEB "
co
co
<-0
~ n +-~
i/;~ ~J(
---L
_lOIn
on :e
-ll I
~ ~
!:: ..
~f
lSVl
! 8 ~!I C: ~ ~!!
~ --1,
tj IJ
~1l:;~l::}1 8
; ~ ~.,+ ~
~ll~
~! ~:1 ~ ~ \.
~! co ~
_v
~ ~ :II ~ ~ ~
~i" ;:e~ :!!ll :!ll ~.. ~
cfll =
"'J.~'"
"'u" ~ C;"
. ~ ~
3l1N3I\V
~
1I
i
iI!1 =
II II
n "
~ ~,~ ~ I :s " "
~~ :t1O~(Jt"'e:i::~
on '" ~
....
/~ II
/ -
AVIA
..
;:: ~
co
co
'"
b
co
"
'-
~
<{
o
'"
co
co
co
D5Ll';:1SI
.
o
z
w
o
w
-'
I>:
UJ
m
'"
::J
Z
"
U
o
--'
m
UJ
Z
::;
111
t-
5E
::;
>-
t-
U
111
t-
5E
::;
~>-
1>:'=
!tu
01>:
I>:w
ll.t-
<
l~
I>:
<<
w w
1>:--'
<u
OW
wQ
0111
<t-
:z;::J
1110
w
Z
::;
w
Z
o
N
>-
t-
I>:
w
ll.
o
I>:
ll.
t:l
z
~
o
>-
t-
U
x
w
Z
Z
<
o
t-
t-
Z
W
'"
W
W
I>:
o
<
z
o
F
<
Z
o
ei
o
o
z
Z
o
N
111
t:l
I>:
o
o
<(
t-
o
-'
~ . ~ I
3N'n
33lI1
-
~
,,~ ~1 ~i ~ir~ /.. ~
~
.-
"" iIIOlNl
"Ii n ~"4 "'il'" i ~ II ~/
- '< ..
~~...~~~iNn~~~i~18~~ :=:
--''<~~>"
\\:'-\.
'\\
\\
\ \
\ \
\ :
: :
! I
, '
: :
, '
, '
. .
, .
. .
J :
. .
, .
, .
.:j
Ii
r {
: t
\\\.
"\\\
\ \
: !
! !
~ .,//
5 4'::>'
I"') ::) Ii ~f/
~_ -< i . rift
;; ~ '-~
~ 0'\
o ,
\",
~ \ \
<( \ \.
....J \\ ~
\ \ ;1
.' ~
\ \
. '
\ \
. .
. .
, '
. .
, '
, '
, '
, '
. '
, ,
, .
" I
/ :
/ "
.-;;;;:;>/
" II
I, II
I, II
:? ~ .--::-::';:::.. \\
!:: ~ it "<\
: ,,",.1 '\ \\~="~,))
II %~
'" '"
t<l!It')
A_
I .-
'"
i (T8'"
~
....
{ i~fmi-i
:n:lY:l
~ 2
Ii:; ~
.. 0
~ i ~
-.!!!!..
....
( "
- N
Ii
~
~ .. ~ 's
~i.!hll\ i.
:ill _~d
~ .. i_'Nn", !i_ Ni
.-
'"
N
..
"
n
"
rL
~
<(\0
"'">
-
r-~
,nO
OJ
&"II
I ~
r- ..I
g:jr- 5O-
N.
~Nf----.
j.~ D::: ~';;', ;;; i g ~ g; ~ ~ ~ ~::; ! ~
YDHONnS ~
f
..
~
-3 ~ .-,'" .
:: ",'00
~ ~ ~\ N .; "~ _~~ ~
; ~,i r- n.... :\ - ~ - ~1':l:).-.s
i ~:~ \ .~~~~ ~i}' II
g" .... \atR :x:
> l ~ il:.... - ~ ~ .... ~ t: n
"tJ ~ ~ ~....... , tJil"---',.... ....
~ "'~~, ~ 0
~~~iJid-~" ~;~~
~ ~~I~:I:~"~ 6~ I
< f'" p::n~ 1Jf90"'1 ~
g z11. ~
!:; :l: -~."" J
$
~<{
ON
ZN
~N
W.
..., UK
-
III Qll-r.h'A
-
N
N
--
N
 ~
....
,IN
~:~~~~:~:>~~~?~~o?J
/ ....' _ _.un_._ ""
': ... ,'" /.-- r"__ ----_ ", ; M:
>:;
!II
-i!!
~
~ ~
'"
~ ~..../ -
.... it..
{ -
0V3HlC03
I
:; ~
s ~ i :!
- - ----
vrn: T
..0
00
W"-
III 0
5C'l
w"-
D'.:~
rn
Vlt"1
<(rr)
....IN
..... f--
<(
zw
o
~ e~
Z b/I
Z LLl/J
o ~~
N::::-I
'---
WN
zn
....
"
~...
<t:
LO
<<:t-
N
~
..~
,
!
....-........ ~
~
~
<<:t-
II-
<{
<<:t-
v
N
'"
.
.
January 11,2004
Mr. John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist
City of Clearwater Planning Department
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Jhil J \1 IUH
i."
Re: Variance Request for property at 2837 Saber Dr., Clearwater Fl. 33759
(FLS2003-12062)
Dear Mr. Schodtler:
This letter is in response to the notification we received regarding a request of variance
for the above referenced property.
Northwood Estates, Tract G, is a distinctive neighborhood in Clearwater due to its larger
than average lot sizes. All homes in this tract are situated on lots of 1f2 acre or more and
we enjoy the space and privacy this provides. In fact, this is the main reason we
purchased our home here in 1991, and we know the same to be true for many of our
neighbors. Of course this also means that we paid a premium to own a home in this type
of neighborhood.
The variance requested would greatly affect the qualities of this neighborhood that have
made it unique and have attracted homeowners for years. Allowing this variance would
open the door for other homeowners to request additional variances in the future, further
damaging the integrity of our development.
The owner of the property in question has made two additions to the home, the latest, a
pool house, is 15 feet from our backyard. We now look out from our pool area to a 10-
foot high block wall. Weare distressed about this, but he was in his legal rights to
construct it so near our property line because it is considered a side yard boundary for
him.
For the reasons stated above, we are definitely against granting any variance to reduce the
setback on this property. Please feel free to contact us via phone, e-mail, or visit to our
home.
Sincerely, ~ \ . '- (J_
~ ~~ t-U~
Philip and Tracie Wiechmann
2430 Sundancer Dr
Clearwater, FL 33759
727 -724-9319 e-mail: tracielw@msn.com
.
.
11.
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
CITY OF CLEARW A TER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM
o
>-
f-
u
January 21, 2004
Mr. & Mrs. Wiechmann
2430 Sun dancer Drive
Clearwater, FL 33759
RE: APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2837
SABER DRIVE (FLS2003-12062)
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Wiechmann:
Thank you for your letter dated January 11, 2004. I would also like to acknowledge the receipt of two
voice mail messages from Tracie Wiechmann. The property requesting the variance is 2837 Saber Drive,
which is located on the south side of Saber Drive approximately 50 feet west of Saber Court. I believe
there is some confusion about the location so I have provided a map showing the applicant's location.
I would also like to clarify the applicant's request. They are asking to build a pool screen enclosure over
their existing pool deck (10.3 feet from the side property line) and will maintain the same side setback as
the already existing home (10.3 feet from the side property line). The reason for the variance is the City's
Land Development Code has changed considerably since the neighborhood was developed. It was
originally developed with thirty-foot front setbacks and ten-foot side and rear setbacks that are visually
the characteristic of your neighborhood. The Code adopted in 1999 now requires a twenty-five foot front
setback and fifteen-foot side and rears setbacks.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through
the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com or my direct email address at
i ohn .schodtler@myclearwater.com
Sincerely,
John Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlStandard F1exIPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRCISaber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR)\Letter to neighbors.doc
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
"
.~
,
.
".
f~ffq~.........,
. .~~~:t.w... (I,< rl/iX~
~..'O.. ~..jJV"'~~G07x....
..~~t'l ~"'-r~-
:e:i~\ ,\ /,/ ." '\ ~ ~
III ~'/.. ~
!.iC"'.l. '.. _.-=- .~.~
..~~ =- g\
......:~-=- ~~
~~~..,(~~\\
....~~~l~,.f..~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 Soum MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (J27) 562-4567 FAX (J27) 562-4576
February 4, 2004
.
Mr. IraF. Berger
2837 Saber Drive
Cle31Water, FL 33759
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-12062 at 2837 Saber Drive
Dear Mr. Berger:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On January 29, 2004, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your
application for Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the side (east) setback from
15 feet to 10.3 feet to a proposed screen enclosure over an existing swimming pool deck, in association
with a single-family residence, under the provisions of Section 2-103.A. The DRC recommended
approval of the application with the following bases:
.'
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Detached Dwelling per
Section 2-103.A.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development. The approval is based on and must adhere to the
site plan and application dated received December 18,2003.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (February 4, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
BRIAN). AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER Hon HAMII.TON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.I,]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
February 4, 2004
Berger - Page Two
.
.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review
Specialist, at 727-562-4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com. * Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\PlIJIming DepartmenM: D B\Standard FlexV'ending Casei13 - Up for the Next DRClSaber Dr 2837 - Berger (LDR) - ApprovedlSaber Dr 2837
Development Order. doc
.
.