Loading...
FLD2002-10033 ',J . . Planning Department .. CI 100 South Myrtle Avenue 01 eaf"IUa~er Clearwater, Florida 33756 ,. , I" I Ii Telephone: 727-562-4567 :~. Fax: 727-562-4576 IJ~ CASE #: _fLP?&.O 2,- )..lll13....:2. DATE RECEIVED: -L~~1-= RECEIVED BY (staff initi'alSf=-W W- ATLAS pAGE #: 7-7_ Iff...;.. ~~.A ZONING DISTRICT: .-,::. LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ''"f ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: , SUBMIT ORIGINAl SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION J SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans - SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ f 2A~ FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 08130/01) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRlNT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Co.rLol4~j ~Q(I ht tLub MAILING ADDRESS: I Oq I ~LriDy(J rJ 0 A;e--- CLea.rwacef · j::( nr LaO- PHONE NUMBER: ~ - 91 (p 2 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): (Must include ALL owners) Dl:L i 7 2002 AGENT NAME: -2ilr. Ro~orYle<snrL MAILING ADDRESS: _17_37- )/\ ~l-e }wen u (>, PHONE NUMBER:'l 'Z... l-L\.4 <..0. ~7...DO FAX NUMBER: '1 'L.'l - 4--4- 1- U S- '2. ~ STREET ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) -' 09/ f LdDY" a do Ave fI Ll.e.. (" I ftlYWa+c..c Fl- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: .32178/11) /SLJ720/ 1+1,1 0050 PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) wi Con~tn..l(:X- Cl 101 X 7-56' aIUWI,nuVY\ dDcl (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 4lx2DI DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ~ V\J(1\/ . , DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater . . C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) a SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. \\ AU ^ ~ \ _ V'"\ j- 11- II ( 2 \ .!..l.Y.LrJ me. J...._-D _ see ,~ 2. The proposed development win not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. a Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary): Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater l . . E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; J( COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; (J PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; (J LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; (J TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) (J GRADING PLAN, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) (J SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 361: All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. (J SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of dweUing units proposed; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R); and Floor area ratio (FAR) for all nonresidential uses. (J REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y:z X 11) and color rendering if possible; (J FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, prOVide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisf, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater . . G. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detentionfretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations [J COpy OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit) [J COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, as applicable H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) [J LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched andfor shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. [J REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible); [J IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); [J COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; [J REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) [J Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). [J Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) [J Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater . . L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELlAS '"'\~~ ~SWO \0 !Ind subscribed before me this ~ day of _ ~ ,A.D. 20~ to me and/or by \t- l'YI . 'i-h~() l'~ is personally known ha&- pi udu~.:I as '1tIcl,tiR~ati9A': ~ ~~d- Signatu f property owner or representative '- ~~ ~Cv-~~QQ Notary public, My commission expires: .....11.. i~'<{l'i~' t~ Tami Schlegel f*i :'1 MYCOMMISSION# 00145266 EXPf S ~"" /$l Augusl26, 2006 o''l..rif..r,''!-' BONDfD THfIU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater . . M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): /n9/ EldO((]r10 A\/f',n ue . C Lea.r Ivat-er- r/ or t'r1a ( CO-rlouel ~t1{ht r Lu bJ 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Cons tr /let 0- lD' x 2~O/ QlurY)lnu VYl rJ. ocjL wLth 0- L{ , ^ 20' -pntJ~Jay . 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we) , the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ~ ~\~~ """- Property Owner A-y~ Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the und~ed, an officer duly commission~C b~e laws of the~e of Florida, on th~ ~~ day of od-E;>hw'- , a... personally appeared 0 td- Y)\. 0 fV\P~Ot\ '? : who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/~fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he~ Sign~~ ~ ...;:;r.~~ Tami Schlegel Notary Public My Commission Expires: f,.~.A:~ MY COMMISSION # 00145266 EXPIRES ~" ,'~"i August 26, 2006 "4'~;,"rjf.tfr~~"" BONDED THRU TROY FAJN INSURANCE,1NC. S.'\Plannmg DepartmenMppltca~on Formltldevelopment rev,eWlfleXlble development appl'ca~on.doc Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater A \tacnrncn t-- A . . 1. Dock criteria (Section 3-601.C.3): Commercial Docks. A commercial dock is any dock, pier, or wharf, including boatlifts, that is used in connection with a hotel, motel or restaurant where the slips are not rented, leased or sold; or such facilities used in connection with a social or fraternal club or organization and used only by its membership; or such facilities constructed and maintained by the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County or by any state or federal agency. Commercial docks shall only be permitted as a Level Two (flexible development) use, which requires approval by the Community Development Board (CDB). Any multi-use dock with a deck area exceeding 500 square feet shall be treated as a commercial dock. All commercial docks shall be reviewed for compliance with the following criteria. . . a. Use and Compatibility. i. The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use ofthe property. - The proposed floating dock will be used for Carlouel members to moor their vessels while visiting. There will only be transient mooring for members and their guests. ii. The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. - The proposed floating dock will be in harmony with the scale & character of adjacent properties. Carlouel has a lot width of 665', which exceeds the lot size of adjacent properties and enables the Club to construct a larger dock. In so doing, the proposed addition along with the existing boatslips amount to less then the allowable 75% of property width at the waterfront that is permitted for commercial dock width. The length of the proposed dock at approximately 14' is not at all an issue. The proposed dock starts at about 6' from the north property line and thus does not observe the center one third of the waterfront width placement that is required for commercial docks abutting residential properties, but is consistent with similar minimal setbacks for other docks in the neighborhood, including the abutting property to the south whose dock approaches a zero setback. The proposed dock is proportional to its upland property size as the surrounding residential docks are to theirs, thus providing harmonious coexistence in both scale and character. 111. The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. ~ The docks in the general vicinity of the Club are all residentiaL To find other commercial docks on the north end of the beach you would have to travel south a little over a mile. If this distance is still considered to be in the general vicinity than the proposed dock is conservatively compatible. Even with the absence of other nearby commercial structures, as stated above the proposed dock is proportionately compatible with the other docks in the neighborhood. b. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. . . - The proposed floating dock will not have any impact on existing water recreation activities, in fact the construction of the new dock is intended to facilitate the safe dockage of vessels visiting the Club. The minimal encroachment of the proposed structure on the navigable waterway will not hinder or discourage the existing or future use of the waterways by vessels, both motorized & non-motorized. c. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. - The proposed structure will not impede navigation, as it is only 14' off the seawall in an area where a deep water channel stretches over 350' across the Bay from the Club's seawall to the grass flats to the east. (Please note: this plan has been reviewed & approved by the Harbormaster of Clearwater fornavigationalpuTjpose~) d. Impacts on Marine Environment. i. Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. -Studies in this area have not provided any evidence of marine grassbeds. The aerial provided in this packet from Pinellas County does not provide any evidence of grassbeds as well. Sounding in the area revealing a minimum water depth of 4' at mean low water supports the absence of seagrasses as the water depth prohibits adequate filtering of essential sunlight for the propagation of aquatic vegetation. 11. Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. - The proposed dock shall have no adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats or marine life as was previously stated. There is a deep-water channel running between the applicants seawall and a wide and prolific seagrass bed and mangrove island estuarine type environment over 350' to the east. Many parts of this rich environment are currently protected and exclude combustion motor use. The proposed dock is located a safe distance from this natural assemblage of both dense and diverse aquatic flora & fauna. There is . . no other known marine growth or habitat in this area of hardened shoreline and long standing navigable waterway. e. Impacts on Water Quality. 1. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom ofthe waterbody at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). ~Soundings of this area indicate water depths of no less than 4' at mean low water (0.95 NGVD datum) at the seawall along the entire width of the proposed dock. Water depths steadily increase with movement to the east, away from the seawall and approaching the center line of the navigable waterway channel at approximately 175 '. No boat traffic will be closer to the seawall than approximately 14' when moored to the proposed dock and will be in an area that is currently used for mooring vessels. Water depth has been and will remain adequate for the vessels that the proposed dock is designed to accommodate due to the open environment and excellent circulation of the water surrounding the proposed structure. 11. The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. ~ The entire width of the applicants property at the waterfront is made up of hardened (seawalled) shoreline as is also the case for the abutting properties both north and south of the Club's property. This is a long standing and fully developed community. The proposed dock has no impact what so ever on the existing condition of the upland or shoreline bulkhead and thus will not have any affect on the current condition or quality of the surrounding water. f. Impacts on Natural Resources. i. The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. - There will be no adverse impacts upon marine life and other natural resources so as to be contrary to the public interest due to the deep water in the area of proposed construction. To the contrary, the floats . . beneath the dock and piling installed to anchor it while being in water deep enough so as not to affect seagrass growth will support the attachment and growth of a wide variety of both plant and animal life that is beneficial to the marine environment. 111. The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. - The dock will not have an adverse impact on any habitat that could be deemed to be critical to the support of any species listed or otherwise. As stated above, the proposed dock is located seaward of a long standing, fully established and developed neighborhood. The upland land use will remain unchanged and the proposed addition is also just an enhancement of the current riparian usage. The property is fortunate have a view of a very important and sensitive vegetated area and aquatic habitat several hundred feet across the waterway. Many portions of this rare natural resource have been protected and preserved in order to attract and sustain a wide range of species within the confines of a highly developed urban community. g. Impacts on Wetlands HabitatlUplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surrounding. - The proposed dock will have no adverse impact on the surrounding uplands. Dimensional Standards. i. Setbacks. All commercial and multi-use docks shall be located so that no portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into the water than ten (10) percent of the applicant's property width measured at the waterfront property line. Multi-use private and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single-family or two- family property must be setback a minimum of one-third (1/3) of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family property. -The applicant's property abuts residential parcels at both ends of the seawall which under the City of Clearwater's dimensional standards for commercial docks with this one third placement of any dock structure. The proposed dock installation is intended to facilitate the continued use of the seawall on the north end of the e . property for the mooring of vessels and the embarking and disembarking of the members and guests of the Club. A recent replacement of the original seawall in this location was completed at a higher elevation to provide for more protection based on updated tidal fluxion standards. The higher seawall however, creates a prolblem for safe and efficient access to boats morred alongside at lower tides. This situation creates the necessity for the floating dock as a safe boarding alternative. The propsed dock stretches along the entire straight length of the northern portion of the poperty's seawall allowing for the same capacity for vessel mooring that the Club has long enjoyed. A center one third placement of a dock would exclude any use of the north wall which the Club is accustomed to, this creating an extreme hardship for the Club and its' members. As previously stated, a near zero setback is consistent with other existing structures in the neighborhood, including the dock immediately adjacent to the south.p ii. Length. The length of commercial and multi-use docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the applicant's property more than seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line. Tie poles may extend beyond the dock provided such poles do not extend twenty-five (25) percent of the width of the waterway and do not constitute a navigational hazard. - The length of the proposed dock from the seawall is approximately 14' far below the allowable 75% of the waterfront property width which at 665' would allow a dock length of just under 500'. There are no new tie poles proposed beyond the new floating dock installation. iii. Width. The width of commercial and multi-use docking facilities shall not exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line. -The width of the proposed dock is 250'. The City of Clearwater's dimensional standards allows for a commercial dock to be up to 75% of the property width at the waterfront. The waterfront property width is 665' making the allowable dock width to be 498.75'. The proposed dock is only 38% of the property width. *(Additional information as per October 3(/h, 2002 letter from Jv. Wells) - Combining the proposed dock with the width of the existing boat slips makes the new total dock structure 471' wide or approximately 71% of the property's waterfront width, still an acceptable dimension. e . - The proposed dock combined with the existing docks will moor approximately 18-20 vessels at one time. This will fluctuate slightly as an average of 30 feet was used to make this determination. iv. Covered boatlifts. Covered boatli:fts are permitted provided a permanent and solid roof deck is constructed with material such as asphalt shingles, metal, tile or wood. Canvas and canvas like roof materials are prohibited. Vertical sidewalls are prohibited on any boatli:ft or dock. ~ There are no covered boatlifts proposed. v. Deviations. Deviations from the requirements of this section may be considered and approved by the Community Development Board in order to comply with the review criteria established in Sections 3- 601 (C)(3)(a) - (g), which are listed above. -A deviation to the setback requirement only is soughtfor with this application. The above stated facts are intended to support this request for an exception to the setback rule. 2. General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913.A.) one through six: . The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Demonstrate how the proposal is similar to other developments in the area. The proposed development seaward of the land will be in harmony with scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties as it maintains a current and ling existing mooring for visiting vessels which the neighborhood is familiar with and accustomed to. While there are few, if any, examples of similar structures in the area due to the absence of any other commercial properties, the proposed addition is similar to the existing use of this portion of the property only differing in a slight shift of mooring vessels directly against piling on the seawall to the mooring of vessels on a dock float approximately 14' off of the seawall. · The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and the of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Show how the proposal is consistent with the pattern of the development in the area. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage any type of development of the adjacent land, buildings, docks or any other structures and will have no negative impact on adjacent property values. The proposed docking enhancement is consistent with the waterfront improvements that e . have and are being made to maintain the safety, beauty, and utility of surrounding properties. . The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the posed use. Explain how the property will operate and how adjacent properties will not be negatively affected; The new floating dock will be used only during Club hours allowing only transient vessel mooring. The dock will only be used by Club members and their guests and will be monitored by staff members. The new dock installed adjacent to and parallel to the existing seawall will keep visiting boats close to shore thereby reducing the impact on neighboring properties. There will be no negative impacts on the ingress, egress or view columns for the neighboring properties. . The proposed development is designed to mmuruze traffic congestion. Explain how the property operates and how the site accessed by all users; - The proposed floating dock will have no impact on traffic congestion, and will provide mooring for members who chose to visit the Club by water. . The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Show how the site is consistent with the community character. -As explained above the proposed docking improvements are to take place at the Carlouel Yacht Club which lends its' name to the surrounding neighborhood. This fully developed historical neighborhood on the north end of Clearwater Beach compliments the Yacht Club, just as the Yacht Club compliments the neighborhood. Enhancements to the Club's facilities are consistent with the character of the community which has grown-up around it. Many of the neighborhoods' residents comprise the Club's membership. . The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Explain how the site operates. - The proposed docking improvement seeks to create a safe, easier to use mooring area with the same capacity as the previously existing system while minimizing the size and impact of a new structure. The float installed parallel to and along 250' of the northern portion of seawall is designed at only 10' wide so as not to extend any further into the waterway as is necessary, while being wide enough to be reasonably stable and this safe. The minimal extension into the waterway minimizes adverse effects pertaining to visual, acoustic and olfactory concerns by keeping moored vessels as close as possible to the original mooring alongside the seawalL The Club's hours of operation which will coincide with the usage of the , . . . dock will not be changed or adjusted following the installation of the proposed floating dock. . . Ol1ecl all correspondence to: Clerk rI WBlBr and NavigaIIon Control Authority 315 Court Street CIeerwater, Fl 33756 1-- (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) COMMERCIAL AND MUL TI~USE DOCK PE6Pf1:1 APPLICA TIOt4 PINELLAS COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION CONJROL AUTHORITY i'It!Hw type, or hand print n BLACK iJk I. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: A. Applicant's Name: B. Matling Address: City: C. Telephone No. (s): n. AGENT INFORMATION: Carlouel Yacht Club 1091. EIdorado Avenue Clearwater State: Fl Zip: 33756 727--446-9162 A. Name: Ress Marine Construction B. Address: 435 Woodlawn Avenue City: C. Telephone No.(s): III. sITe INFORMATION A. Construction Site Address: City: B. Parcel 10 Number: C. Incorporated I!J D. Affected waterbody: BelIeair State: FL Zip: 33756 727-446-2945 Clearwater 1091 E1dorado Avenue State: Fl 321 2BI 15/ 547201 171 Zip: 33756 50 Unicorporated 0 Clearwater Clearwater Harbor E. Previous permits: F. Date applicant assumed property ownership: G. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) None H. Attach 8 - 112" x 11" vicinity map showing specific project location. I. All other information pursuant to P.C.O. 9t).19 (amended), Section 10.8; as needed. ItIClI1th/)'oaa J. For projects requiring a publiC hearing, attach a copy of the complete legal description~ K. Does the project abut residentially zoned property? Yes No x L For projects requiring public hearing, attach a copy of the complete legal description. D4&W~1IENVMGMNTJPrAAd1 4126J94 . . Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. Nature and SiZe of Project: MULTI-USE r!l COMMERCIAL 0 Construct a 10' x 250' aluninum dock w/4' x 20' gangway. Square feet: 2500 B. Variance: Yea IKJ No 0 Amount in Variance: Length: Width: Setbactcs: l R Other: Exceeds 500 square feet. Square fo~ exceed by 2000square feet. NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances are consistent with the variance criteria of the PinelJas County Water and Navigation Control Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the nature of and need for any variance. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement of the regulations would result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property. Thehardshlp must not be created by action(s) of the property owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicanfs property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined In the regulations. staff cannot recommend approval of the application. . v. CONTRACTOR INFORMAnON: I, Robert Ress . a certified contractor, state that the dock has not been constructed and that it wlU be built in compliance with all requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which accurately represent all the information required to be fumished. In the event that this dock is not built in accordance with the permit or the information fumished Is not correct. I agree to either remove the dock or correct the deficiency. Signed: ~~ .G?~ Cert. No.: C-4192 Company Name: . Ress Marine Construction Telephone H27-446-2945 Address: 435 WoodlaWn Avenue Betleair, FL 33756 VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done aCCOrding to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such construction and, if said constructions within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first secure approVal from said municipality, to first secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction wi" be maintained in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am the legal owner of the upland from which . herein propose to construct the Improvements, and that the above stated agenUcontractor may act as my representative. I understand that '. not Plnellas County, am responsible for the accuracy of the Information provided as part of this application and that It is my responsiblJity to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the proposed activities on either private or sovereign owned submerged land. . \ 0- ~\- az. Date D48WD/ar1JENVMGMNTlPrAAd2 4126/94 MapQuest: Maps: print . . Page 1 of1 -: MAPe\.tESf. :- 1091 Eldorado Ave Clearwater, FL 33767-1007, US ~ -~~~,.--- 01 ,300m '900ft ~ . , I . J 1 I I , ... j Sd'h ar retl ~d90iJr' , II ~ I I J~I~lo:tJrJl!~.!!d I I I I I I I dfa'tfeSils I an d sra~ei,~ar;.k All ria hts reserved. Use Su blect to L1cense/CoDvrlght ~AV"'l!C:~ J ....:._~~.... This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Privacy Policy & Legal Notices @ 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. .../print.adp?mapdata=IU7%2bzZp2wKX6Bwpwg7nrnF7MIG71 tVCaGEV9Uosm5FssfzOPX%21 0/18/02 -I . . Applicatioil# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) DISCLOSURE FORM In order to alleviate any potential conflict of Interest with Pinellas County staff, it is required that the AuthoritY be provided with a listing of PERSONS being party to a trust. corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone who may have beneficial interest in the application which would be affected by any decision rendered by the Authority. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) A. PROPERTY OWNERS: Name: Carlouel Yacht Club Address: .1091 Eldorado Avenue Clearwater, Fl 33756 Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: B. REPRESENTATIVES: Name: Mr. Robert Thompson Address: 1237 Myrtle Avenue Suite 301 Clearwater, FL 33756 Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: C. OTHER PERSON HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPEm N/A Interest is: contingent 0 absolute I!J Name: specific interest held D. DOES A CONTRACT FOR SALE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? VB- NO-X- If so, the contract is: contingent 0 absolute O. Name of parties to the contract: E. DOES AN OPTION TO PURCHASE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES NO X Name of parties to the option: F. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: I hereby certify that the information stated above is complete. accurate, and true to the best of my knowledge. Qt-~a- ~ Date: \b -'2.-\-0'2.- D481VVD/ar1/ENVMGMNTlPrAAd54l26194 " - ~- 'f . ~ 1000 500 0 .............. 2?OO 1"_2000' CI TY OF CLEARWATER AND VICINITY PINELLAS CO.) FLORIDA e 10 '" ~ ~ ~ e t <~ ~ ~ '...., ":~ .... .~ I I SCALE o 100' 200' ... I ~ -A en <t -' r- <l Dunedin Pass w (J) => o :J: ... l:l oC:j. ... ~ ... 'll .... I;) a:: ~ ... w I;) 'll ..... r- <.) <l ~ a:: <l w -' () l:l I.> La.. >< <l> 0 ~ >- r- .... l:l () ,~ :J ~ '~ . . ~. ,i.. ,';~>~~;t:'~:~~r:i:' ,,:' '.' ,~r' , )):; ';~i~::: ]'.~Wl',~~~}~i!/i;'~' ;~\::.,""~ _,..t.,....,...,......', '.. :,' -"'~"'. " ).;:~! :,:::.; :~F;,~,:r.,~~;itL\ Jt" . 'I, ;,...., , ' . , , , , ' " , " i ", .' '. ~ ,,! ~. ,~ 1000 500 0 ... H I-f 10-11-4 I 1000 ., . 2000 , 110.2000' CITY O/F CLEA'RWATER .AND VICI.NITY PI NELLA.S CO.) FLORIDA ~ t) .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ... ; ;;. ;~ ~ ~ ---...... '......:---.... ...~, ...~..~ .~~; '~':cl' "t' ;"'.' . '~" ~,. ~ ~. ~ "..to .,\.tl,. ." "f" . ~ii ',." . ~. .." ~ ~ Q) ~ ~\- ..J,.I,.",,!_~' . ,,~"I"'''''';' I, I' , '. ...~.\"..': .~:o' ~ . / / ./ . " .' Dunedin Pass ~ ~~ . \ seA L E o 100' 200' ... I en <( -J t- e::( . I.LJ (/) ::> o :t: "'- c::) ~, "'- t) ::t: 'I "'- Q) ..... t) ~ a::: "'- t) 1LJ Q) ...... (.) t- . e::( .,',~ a: <( lJJ -J U c::) (.) '- lL. )( cu 0 ~ >- "'- c::) t- U '4... '- ::s (..!) " , ;'.,,- .. '.', , of>.......~ '". .', .~:...~~'.;}.~~..~ " . '-" '; ~ . . f -:';;{ .~ ': .,' j. ....\.< .. I n~,~~'-., .' ~:.. \\;t~;..: . .< :? :-it:' ~'.:~~;.~.j , '. \ . ~ -... , , (0 J- ~ " " ",-' :< ',;. :~;::.~~' .:-.. '.~ '.. '::Z/ -~~- B'L-_._ .. . ./ ~\ 100 ~025 0 ~......... ;,. . " ..,..... ..'.' .. . :,- :~'~"~' .:; . h';" -....... . Idvanced nvironmental echnologies, LLC Consulting Engineers & Scientists . November 26, 2002 To: Roger Haymond, CCM Carlouel Yacht Club 1091 Eldorado Avenue Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 DEe "3" /"":J Dear Mr. Haymond: Advanced Environmental Technologies, LLC (AET) is pleased to present this report of the seagrass survey of your proposed dock site on Clearwater Beach Island, Clearwater Beach, Florida. The area directly below the proposed dock location and approximately 30' seaward was examined for seagrasses and hard-bottom communities. The survey was conducted on November 18 by snorkeling the area, making frequent spot checks ofthe bottom (i.e., every 20-40 feet in transects parallel to the seawall). The depth of the overlying water ranged from 4~' to 8' at low tide and visibility was less than 3'. The bottom is composed of silty, fine sand with occasional burrows and tracks, possibly from polychaetes and small crabs. No seagrass was found. Because it was late in the season, special care was taken to examine the sediment for rhizomes and root structures that might indicate that a winter die back had occurred and that seagrasses would reappear in the spring. These belowground structures were not present. Further, there were live, green seagrasses visible across the bay during low tide, suggesting that, had there been seagrasses at this site, they would not yet have died back for the winter. The only seagrasses at this site were dead, blackened clumps of manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme) and scattered, single blades of turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum) in depressions in the bottom and in the lee of pilings near the seawall. These grass blades lacked roots and had clearly drifted in from other locations. No hard-bottom communities (e.g., oysters, soft corals, bryozoans, and tunicates) were found, nor were any suitable substrates upon which such communities could develop. The area is a typical, un,vegetated, soft-bottom habitat, which would be expected to support meiofauna (e.g., copepods and nematodes), macrofauna (e.g., polychaetes), and the small fish and crabs that prey upon them. The construction of the proposed dock and the mooring of boats would not be expected to impact this community. .., The proposed dock location is clear of seagrasses and hard-bottom communities. For additional information or clarification, please feel free to contact us at 850-385-2010. Sincerely, Advanced Environmental Technologies, LLC ~eh.D. Biological Oceanographer Jeremy Craft Director of Wetlands/Wildlife Management Cc: Bill Allbright Corporate Office: p.o. Box 70246, Albany. GA 31708-0246. Phone 229-430-9120. Fax 229-430-9122. Toll Free 888-779-9120 Gainesville, FL. Phone 352-331-0376. Pensacola, FL. Phone 850-471-2127. Tallahassee, FL . Phone 850-385-2010. Tampa, FL. Phone 813-643-2241 J! T'" rn G'\ ~ c r-r, CJ tn 0 rn lJ) () U) I ;-- 0 ~ 3 <::: ... ~ ttJ 0 )> r-- r) r- ~ ~ Tn r- rn - 0 ~ '< c: \S) ). v, ~ l'11 rn ~ ~ ('\ () 0 ~ -t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (.f) Ii- \:J:.l ;1 (II )> f ~ -< c:: G\ ~ Fit r> Ju ) ----( () " ~ 0 -.... ... () f"- III < '::II \ \AI () ~ I'l\ :c:> ~, c: co .--.J ~ U1 .>:> w N ~ ~. >. rn ~ II;J 0 NI-l 0 :=<1 ro ~CIl""'I-l"tl"tle:MI"1Ple:n ro~ c ::s ro ::s I'D en tlI cT A 0 1-'- CIl ro I--' I--' 0' (Jl llJ ><~ ~ ~..o ,a Ul """I-l ,.....~"1nooon.o C'T...... en s= PI o PI ;>;Cl-l~ro. ;>; llJ cT < ;>; . (Jl ~ o ~ ~ ro ro 1-'-'0 .~ I-l Ul n ro ro cTtlIro ::s'O v.., c . tlI ~"O :.11"<: cT..o 1'1 to I tlI cT CD 0....... ~ - ~ "tlrol-l 0- 0 C c:: I-l C'T 1-" cT ~ 1-" ,..... - PI 80..0 f-'tlI ::s ~ I-'.t; tlI ~ 1-'-0 1-"CD ::s 1-'- ~ I-l >< ,1) cT ro t; en ro O::S 0..< l!:l::S "n ~ 0.. m roO'X' m ::s ro llJ l!:l - ~ :( !-' ~ CD 0..0..0' CD f-I. cT COl Z ~ 1'l'J m 1-'- ...... 1-' tlI tlI ro . ro cT lQ~ ~I-'. 0 :J ~ 1-'- cT N = C'T :( m I-l m ::l 1-" '1:1 ro 0 ....... t-3 ct 0..::;- ro tlI 1-" < 0 < ::l PIN t>:I ~ CD o..l'1l-llQ ~ro~ro 0' = CIl \1\ "- en < n 0 o..::s ro ...... "<: ...... I o ~ ~ ).. '"" rono.. ro >< H < ~H1' < C) ~ ~ ::l ::l:>'lllJeno. n ::s roo~ ..... ro N C'\ Hl"<: C'T f-I. cT ...... CD cT tlI 0 ....... ...... ^ t ~ ...... ro::Sello..cT '0 ro ~ 0.. llJ = ::s Ul C) 0.. I-llQ CD 0 cTt; 0 I cT ro ~ o ~ m ...... tlI en cT :( ...... - () C ~ n OJ llJ OJ 0 o..WI 0 0- J\) ?lO- t.... en a. 00 11 0 00. l ... ~ Nell 0.. ...... 0.. ..... ro ~ OJ NOJ ::s ::s .to O"tlCD co PI (') ~ 1-'- C'T CD n 0 oCllen = ~ (') I--' en () OJ C'T "%j ...... OJ>' ~ f cT en lQ ...... , Q. ::s ...... ....... IT I ! :::rJ o c;' tJI, ~ r- . ..... F.k.,. ........l::-'V4) ........ ~o - ,0.... ,-,op~, )> , ~~ F -....;~,....".(t' ~ -; 171 ~ C) ~ , S ~ ~, . . Tuesday, October 15, 2002 Mr. Mark Parry Planner City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Floating Dock Carlouel Yacht Club Dear Mr. Parry: We understand that the Carlouel Yacht Club proposes to install a 250' by 10' floating dock against their newly installed sea wall at the northernmost 256'-2" of their property to aid members in entering and departing the Carlouel property from their boats. With the height of the new sea wall it would be almost impossible for access to the property from small boats without the proposed floating dock. Please accept this letter as formal notification that the Carlouel Point Homeowners Association, consisting of all the property owners north of the Carlouel Yacht Club, has no objection to the installation of this improvement for Carlouel boat owners' access to the Club property. NT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION f ( - CASE #: ft.~_/<DO ii!oi!> DATE RECEIVED:' I () 1_ RECEIVED BY (~inl ~): v.]\J ATLAS PAGE #: 2-7.-7 .~ 2-3 B A ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: '-:r; ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: j' ; Clearwater o~ ~ Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 7V-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4676 CI SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION CI SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans I-?"'---~ CI SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ _ ~v , FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 08/30/01) ....PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT.... A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: r:.ar-t 0 1~f'J ,fa ('hi MAILING ADDRESS: ~ og I ~' \d n :ad n PHONE NUMBER: ,27- Lj L) & - 9 I{o 2 CJub A.v~ , Q\~~J F==1- 3'31C' FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: My- , 'Knee;'1: ~-'yYl'pson MAILING ADDRESS: 123"0- 5 M'I y-t-; Ie Av eJJl1 e PHONE NUMBER: ", 2 {- ~ LI (p -- 2.200 FAX NUMBER: L;Ul ie.. -iF 301 C( ~rN'~~ 33 1st;; LL-i - 44 7 -lo~24 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS: '0'-11 ~ Idon-ldo Ave (',I~ 1:LrV\ I a* 1"" i=" L LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: 32/281 jC'~ ~720 / I +-1 - JD05() I I ' PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): I 0' ;( 2. ~ b I -F ) 0 al-t V1.Q r.l () (' 1: fbr -t-ra. VI s, t"'" Vl t Vt" ,c)<.,e.., (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square foo~e of nonresidential use) Yh 00 ring , DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ..I.n rt-a... \ l I 0 I ^ h (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of perk! spaces, specific use, etc,) w'! I be:.. piaced out Or ,+hf' {'enkr '-/:-hI r&, DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents ,. . C. ~ROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ~ [J SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) [J Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Atta(h trerd '~" 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the iappropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the healt or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic cor estion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community haracter of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. [J Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific lar ~ use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary): .." Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater " . . E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) t;V' SiGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; I!("' COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Cl PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; IOY LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ~\ro TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) ~\~6 GRADING PLAN, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) Cl SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 O'x12' clear space); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. Cl SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of dwelling units proposed; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. Cl REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (a y. x 11) and color rendering if possible; Cl FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees a" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater " . ... G. S,TORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4~202.A.21 ) o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible); o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Page 4 of 6 - Aexible Development Application - City of Clearwater " L. SIGNATURE: " I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. "-- T- . STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS \ II ~ ~Qr-n. to and subscribed before. me this ~ day of U~ be;- ,A.D. 2000. to me and/or by ~O ~ -* rt'I, 't'l",O''''fX'01, vr. , who is personally known ~ prnd~~~ ~ i(l'!!I,lificaliorr.-' ~~ ~c~c9 . My commission expires: /~~I' r~ Taml Schlegel E*:' :*1 MYCOMMISSION# 00145266 EXPIRES ~" ..~....g August 26, 2006 ".':f.P'f..r..'t" BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANC~ INC Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater 1 I'M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: . . CO.Y\DUe\ "I Qr nt (JdV (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) ofthe fOlloA~;cribed property (address or general location): \ jJq., t \dovc::t,j 0 'c , 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) .--- I X :>:SD i f \ 0 Cc\--t V1S 4 () cJl ..1- n Std\\ 0 to 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Ko~t --11\0 YV\p~SOrl as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ~~~;r~ I (- /"- ,~ Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINaLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commission~ b~e laws of th~ate of Florida, on this c::;).. '--\ ~ day of ~ ,dOC>a.... personally appeared 0 ~ '" I '>OmfJEx?n ,;;-r--.. who having been first duly sworn De","" ,"d ..ys th,t h'_fuIIy """"",,,,"d, the OO"t,"" of the oflid.., thof he/She.s~"e'd. . ~ ''''''''''S 8~ /~y.r/l,~'" Taml chlegel . My Commission Expires: }A'~;~ MYCOMMISSION# 00145266 EXPIRES Notary Pu hc ~'" ,.'s""i August 26.2006 ..../,f,,9f:t~~~.... BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, lNC . . , S:IFfanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development application. doc Page 6 of 6 - Aexible Development Application - City of Clearwater fI' ", At\-ochmc(\-\ A a. Use and Compatibility. i. The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property. - The proposed floating dock will be used for Carlouel members to moor their vessels while visiting. There will only be transient mooring for members and their guests. ii. The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. - The proposed floating dock will be in harmony with the scale & character of adjacent properties. Carlouel has a lot width of 665', which exceeds the lot size of adjacent properties and enables the Club to construct a larger dock. In so doing, the proposed addition along with the existing boatslips amount to less then the allowable 75% of property width at the waterfront that is permitted for commercial dock width. The length of the proposed dock at approximately 14' is not at all an issue. The proposed dock starts at about 6' from the north property line and thus does not observe the center one third of the waterfront width placement that is required for commercial docks abutting residential properties, but is consistent with similar minimal setbacks for other docks in the neighborhood, including the abutting property to the south whose dock approaches a zero setback. The proposed dock is proportional to its upland property size as the surrounding residential docks are to theirs, thus providing harmonious coexistence in both scale and character. 111. The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. -The docks in the general vicinity of the Club are all residentiaL To find other commercial docks on the north end of the beach you would have to travel south a little over a mile. If this distance is still considered to be in the general vicinity than the proposed dock is conservatively compatible. Even with the absence of other nearby commercial structures, as stated above the proposed dock is proportionately compatible with the other docks in the neighborhood. b. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. fI' .. - The proposed floating dock will not have any impact on existing water recreation activities, in fact the construction of the new dock is intended to facilitate the safe dockage of vessels visiting the Club. The minimal encroachment of the proposed structure on the navigable waterway will not hinder or discourage the existing or future use of the waterways by vessels, both motorized & non-motorized. c. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use ofthe proposed dock shall not have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. - The proposed structure will not impede navigation, as it is only 14' off the seawall in an area where a deep water channel stretches over 350' across the Bay from the Club's seawall to the grass flats to the east. (Please note: this plan has been reviewed & approved by the Harbormaster of Clearwater for navigational purposes.) d. Impacts on Marine Environment. i. Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. -Studies in this area have not provided any evidence of marine grassbeds. The aerial provided in this packet from Pinel/as County does not provide any evidence of grassbeds as well. Sounding in the area revealing a minimum water depth of 4' at mean low water supports the absence of seagrasses as the water depth prohibits adequate filtering of essential sunlight for the propagation of aquatic vegetation. 11. Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. - The proposed dock shall have no adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats or marine life as was previously stated. There is a deep-water channel running between the applicants seawall and a wide and prolific seagrass bed and mangrove island estuarine type environment over 350' to the east. Many parts of this rich environment are currently protected and exclude combustion motor use. The proposed dock is located a safe distance from this natural assemblage of both dense and diverse aquatic flora & fauna. There is fI' - no other known marine growth or habitat in this area of hardened shoreline and long standing navigable waterway. e. Impacts on Water Quality. 1. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the waterbody at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). ~Soundings of this area indicate water depths of no less than 4' at mean low water (0.95 NGVD datum) at the seawall along the entire width of the proposed dock. Water depths steadily increase with movement to the east, away from the seawall and approaching the center line of the navigable waterway channel at approximately 175'. No boat traffic will be closer to the seawall than approximately 14' when moored to the proposed dock and will be in an area that is currently used for mooring vessels. Water depth has been and will remain adequate for the vessels that the proposed dock is designed to accommodate due to the open environment and excellent circulation of the water surrounding the proposed structure. ll. The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. ~ The entire width of the applicants property at the waterfront is made up of hardened (seawalled) shoreline as is also the case for the abutting properties both north and south of the Club's property. This is a long standing and fully developed community. The proposed dock has no impact what so ever on the existing condition of the upland or shoreline bulkhead and thus will not have any affect on the current condition or quality of the surrounding water. f. Impacts on Natural Resources. i. The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. - There will be no adverse impacts upon marine life and other natural resources so as to be contrary to the public interest due to the deep water in the area of proposed construction. To the contrary, the floats FILE COpy fI' - beneath the dock and piling installed to anchor it while being in water deep enough so as not to affect seagrass growth will support the attachment and growth of a wide variety of both plant and animal life that is beneficial to the marine environment. lll. The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. -The dock will not have an adverse impact on any habitat that could be deemed to be critical to the support of any species listed or otherwise. As stated above, the proposed dock is located seaward of a long standing, fully established and developed neighborhood. The upland land use will remain unchanged and the proposed addition is also just an enhancement of the current riparian usage. The property is fortunate have a view of a very important and sensitive vegetated area and aquatic habitat several hundred feet across the waterway. Many portions of this rare natural resource have been protected and preserved in order to attract and sustain a wide range of species within the confines of a highly developed urban community. g. Impacts on Wetlands HabitatfUplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surrounding. -The proposed dock will have 1)0 adverse impact on the surrounding uplands. Dimensional Standards. i. Setbacks. All commercial and multi-use docks shall be located so that no portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into the water than ten (10) percent of the applicant's property width measured at the waterfront property line. Multi-use private and commercial docks abutting adjacent waterfront single-falnily or two- family property must be setback a minimum of one-third (113) of the applicant's waterfront property width from the adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family property. - The applicant's property abuts residential parcels at both ends of the seawall which under the City of Clearwater's dimensional standards for commercial docks with this one third placement of any dock structure. The proposed dock installation is intended to facilitate the continued use of the seawall on the north end of the Fri i,,,, " ....'".1.1 '$ fI' - property for the mooring of vessels and the embarking and disembarking of the members and guests of the Club. A recent replacement of the original seawall in this location was completed at a higher elevation to provide for more protection based on updated tidal fluxion standards. The higher seawall however, creates a prolblem for safe and efficient access to boats morred alongside at lower tides. This situation creates the necessity for the floating dock as a safe boarding alternative. The propsed dock stretches along the entire straight length of the northern portion of the poperty's seawall allowing for the same capacity for vessel mooring that the Club has long enjoyed. A center one third placement of a dock would exclude any use of the north wall which the Club is accustomed to, this creating an extreme hardship for the Club and its' members. As previously stated, a near zero setback is consistent with other existing structures in the neighborhood, including the dock immediately adjacent to the south. 11. Length. The length of commercial and multi-use docks shall not extend from the mean high water line or seawall of the applicant's property more than seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line. Tie poles may extend beyond the dock provided such poles do not extend twenty-five (25) percent of the width of the waterway and do not constitute a navigational hazard. - The length of the proposed dock from the seawall is approximately 14' far below the allowable 75% of the watetfront property width which at 665' would allow a dock length of just under 500'. There are now new tie poles proposed beyond the new floating dock installation. iii. Width. The width of commercial and multi-use docking facilities shall not exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line. - The width of the proposed dock is 250'. The City of Clearwater's dimensional standards allows for a commercial dock to be up to 75% of the property width at the watetfront. The watetfront property width is 665' making the allowable dock width to be 498.75'. The poposed dock is only 38% of the property width. iv. Covered boatlifts. Covered boatlifts are permitted provided a permanent and solid roof deck is constructed with material such as asphalt shingles, metal, tile or wood. Canvas and canvas like roof materials are prohibited. Vertical sidewalls are prohibited on any boatlift or dock. - There are no covered boatlifts proposed. .. fI' '" v. Deviations. Deviations from the requirements of this section may be considered and approved by the Community Development Board in order to comply with the review criteria established in Sections 3- 601 (C)(3)(a) - (g), which are listed above. -A deviation to the setback requirement only is soughtfor with this application. The above stated facts are intended to support this request for an exception to the setback rule. 2. General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913.A.) one through six: . The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Demonstrate how the proposal is similar to other developments in the area. The proposed development seaward of the land will be in harmony with scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties as it maintains a current and ling existing mooring for visiting vessels which the neighborhood is familiar with and accustomed to. While there are few, if any, examples of similar structures in the area due to the absence of any other commercial properties, the proposed addition is similar to the existing use of this portion of the property only differing in a slight shift of mooring vessels directly against piling on the seawall to the mooring of vessels on a dock float approximately 14' off of the seawall. . The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and the of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Show how the proposal is consistent with the pattern of the development in the area. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage any type of development of the adjacent land, buildings, docks or any other structures and will have no negative impact on adjacent property values. The proposed docking enhancement is consistent with the waterfront improvements that have and are being made to maintain the safety, beauty, and utility of surrounding properties. . The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the posed use. Explain how the property will operate and how adjacent properties will not be negatively affected; The new floating dock will be used only during Club hours allowing only transient vessel mooring. The dock will only be used by Club members and their guests and will be monitored by staff members. The new dock installed adjacent to and parallel to the existing seawall will keep visiting boats close to shore thereby reducing the impact on neighboring properties. There will " - - be no negative impacts on the ingress, egress or view columns for the neighboring properties. . The proposed development is designed to 1ll1I11Il1lZe traffic congestion. Explain how the property operates and how the site accessed by all users; - The proposed floating dock will have no impact on traffic congestion, and will provide mooring for members who chose to visit the Club by water. . The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Show how the site is consistent with the community character. -As explained above the proposed docking improvements are to take place at the Carlouel Yacht Club which lends its' name to the surrounding neighborhood. This fully developed historical neighborhood on the north end of Clearwater Beach compliments the Yacht Club, just as the Yacht Club compliments the neighborhood. Enhancements to the Club'sfacilities are consistent with the character of the community which has grown-up around it. Many of the neighborhoods' residents comprise the Club's membership. . The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Explain how the site operates. - The proposed docking improvement seeks to create a safe, easier to use mooring area with the same capacity as the previously existing system while minimizing the size and impact of a new structure. The float ins/plied parallel to and along 250' of the northern portion of seawall is designed'. only 10' wide so as not to extend any further into the waterway as Is necessary, while being wide enough to be reasonably stable and this safe. The minimal extension into the waterway minimizes adverse effects pertaining to visual, acoustic and olfactory concerns by keeping moored vessels as close as possible to the original mooring alongside the seawall. The Club's hours of operation which will coincide with the usage of the dock will not be changed or adjusted following the installation of the proposed floating dock. FILE C,f""'", . . Direct all correspondence to: Clerk of Water and Navigation Control Authority 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-USE DOCK PERMTI APPLICATION PINELLAS COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY Please type, or hand print in SLACK ink I. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: A. Applicant's Name: Carlouel Yacht Club B. Mailing Address: 1091 Eldorado Avenue City: C. Telephone No. (s): Clearwater State: FL Zip: 33756 727-446-9162 II. AGENT INFORMATION: A. Name: Ress Marine Construction B. Address: 435 Woodlawn Avenue City: Belleair State: FL Zip: 33756 C. Telephone No.(s): 727-446-2945 III. SITE INFORMATION A. Construction Site Address: City: Clearwater 1091 Eldorado Avenue State: FL Zip: 33756 B. ParcellD Number: 32/ 28/ 15/ 54720/ 171 50 C. Incorporated ~ D. Affected waterbody: Unicorporated 0 Clearwater Clearwater Harbor E. Previous permits: F. Date applicant assumed property ownership: month/year G. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) None H. Attach 8 - 1/2" x 11" vicinity map showing specific project location. I. All other information pursuant to P.C.O. 90-19 (amended), Section 10.8, as needed. J. For projects requiring a public hearing, attach a copy of the complete legal description. K. Does the project abut residentially zoned property? Yes No x L. For projects requiring public hearing, attach a copy of the complete legal description. riLE CDPY D48IWD/ar1IENVMGMNT/PrAAd14/26/94 . . Application # (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. Nature and Size of Project: MULTI-USE 00 COMMERCIAL 0 Construct a 10' x 250' aluninum dock w/4' x 20' gangway. Square feet: 2500 B. Variance: Yes 1KI No 0 AmOunt in variance: Length: Width: Setbacks: L R Other: Exceeds 500 square feet. Square footage exceed by 2000square feet. NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the nature of and need for any variance. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement of the regulations would result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property. Thehardship must not be created by action(s) of the property owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's property. Should the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the criteria outlined in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application. V. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: I, Robert Ress , a certified contractor, state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which accurately represent all the information required to be furnished. In the event that this dock is not built in accordance with the permit or the information furnished is not correct, I agree to either remove the dock or correct the deficiency. Signed: ~ ~ Cert. No.: C-4192 Company Name: Ress Marine Construction Telephone ~ 727-446-2945 Address: 435 Woodlawn Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: t hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such construction and, if said constructions within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first secure approval from said municipality, to first secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am the legal owner of the upland from which I herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above stated agent/contractor may act as my representative. I understand that I, not Pinellas County, am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the proposed activities on either private or sovereign owned submerged land. 10- 'L\ -o'L Date ~i (O-A _~ Legal Owner's Signatur A- c,----vu .or- D48WD/ar1IENVMGMNT/PrAAd2 4/26/94 MapQuest: Maps: print . . Page 1 of1 -: MAPCl\JE$fe : - 1091 Eldorado Ave Clearwater, FL 33767-1007, US Back 'MX....~-...- 01 ,300m '900ft , ) ~ r r ~ I t ~~a.u. el'l .gfgelif .!'1~1 f(J1.eJI~M caf~~e~ffls I an d sgte.1~~!tk All rlahts reserved. Use Sublect to license/Copvriaht lr.'AV"T"ECH~ ..i:!_:W~.'" This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Privacy Policy & Legal Notices @ 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. .../print.adp?mapdata=IU7%2bzZp2wKX6Bwpwg7nmF7MlG71 tVCaGEV9Uosm5FssflOPX%21 0/18/02 . . Application# (OFFICIAL USE ONLY) DISCLOSURE FORM In order to alleviate any potential conflict of interest with Pinellas County staff, it is required that the Authority be provided with a listing of PERSONS being party to a trust, corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone who may have beneficial interest in the application which would be affected by any decision rendered by the Authority. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) A. PROPERTY OWNERS: Name: Address: Carlouel Yacht Club 1091 Eldorado Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: B. REPRESENTATIVES: Name: Address: Mr. Robert Thompson 1237 Myrtle Avenue Suite 301 Clearwater, FL 33756 Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: C. OTHER PERSON HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERn N/A Interest is: contingent D absolute [!J Name: specific interest held D. DOES A CONTRACT FOR SALE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES NO-1L- If so, the contract is: contingent D absolute D Name of parties to the contract: E. DOES AN OPTION TO PURCHASE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES NO X Name of parties to the option: F. OWNER'S SIGNATURE: I hereby certify that the information stated above is complete, accurate, and true to the best of my knowledge. ~~~ Date: I D - i.., I -D'L- D48IWD/ar1IENVMGMNT IPrAAd54126/94 ;,--- " . --'" \ . \ , ,\ ) i . ~E~~~~1 /1 i t ,:~t.~~;,:it" /r-~; .~mii /....~'" / I r'r Itifi"I,.,.(~,;;',i " " . .....;/~. ~} ,~ Ii ~ ,1' r1 .~~ ;::: , '\" ~ l i.i ,'r. , " (____ 1_ i "t~ J~I~' . - \, . ~ 'q __ ,. I) i ' II -_K__J5:~ ! ' r--------. I . , -, I I .,. i i I II' +~.,~ I \ II I. ....' 1/ j '- -") .. I. I! .?' ..._1 ... . r---- 1 ! -"'; . ,. rt i . 1~ I . ,.\\ 1 'f i .. r . i . i I I. I. L. _.j -... \1- < .. t '. I , f'''~ : ,~, \..' ..... J 'I ',j i ~ :,' f '< ;, i! .' l'II" ,..--i'~: 'i,. .' .".. . 0 . -2";- ,"'. f;.... /) ";' c:> ", r; ~:\. '\~';' ~., ~ '~\\'/),'i ';.. .~. . t f ..,~ .:' . 'I' ~ . ".,) - . . -:'CJ' , f'l J ..(;.> ,..<'''''1 ~,.;;,.".:,. ' 'f J-- /', f'? r\ .' ~ ~ .. ,t" - --.- .~ ---- " - - ... ~ . '. '~-" . ......~.. ~, ~, .~ ~. (. ,~ "'\'Ilr. 1*. em ~ -< )> :I: m "'0 )> . "'0:0 () :0' CD - . ,.-t .<0 -< o ~O )> -n . . C3 enO -Ir- z 'gJ ~ ~ -:D _ en <. G) 0 ~ ~ .,,~ _ "m o -,:II z (') m ~_. .--,~' . "'. ........ :4 "" J 'Ct' r- II~,~ ; ,'~,:.l; .I.~i ;',~,_""1 ; l' ':<ci 1\. ~~f!! ~~~. '. ,;.. " -.... .~, " ;,..~1;.."," :.:'.~" ~:s: fc tr ,~ :, .fl'" If \:. .,' 1~ ." ... ~!..... '~ .:,. . --'" ~ '.i1f',l- ,_,""'.i ~ ~l; if,;';, :1><' \,iP i i j . Sent By: dex 856; ~17; 12 Oct 02 0:15; Job 531jpag~ , BIJREA\J OF LAND M.'.NAGDmNT SERVICES DIVISION OF STATE LANDS AFFIDAVI1' FOR GRANDFATHER STRUCTURE REGISTRATION PROGRAM DAtE ~EQOESTED ( ) l>AtE p.tCBrVED ( ) A~tON Grandfather structure Reoietration No. ~20083 County I'intlhs lNSTRUCTIONS; Please complete this Aftidavit 1n its entirety as relates to subject Grandfather structure Registration and return within 15 days to: Bureau of LAnd Manaoement Services Diviaion of State Lands Department of Natural Rftsources 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399 R091strant Name: Street Addrcao: Post Office !ox; Carlollcl Yacht. Corporation 1091 ijldora~o ^V""Uc Ci.ty: r.l.~~"''r.~r State: Florida 34630 Zip Codo Phone Number: (..JlJ.J-) -141H1l62 Area Code AEP'IDAyIT QF OWNERSHIP OR CON~Ot. I hereby certify that I am the re;istrant and (check one): record owner x --lease holOer of the upland p~operty landward of the 8ubmerged land$ for which a aran4f&tbcred ,Stxuctureae9istration has been _pp~oved, and that sa1d property is all the property that 18 oonti~uous to and fl1ndwarcr-of th~e state-owned ,ubmerge~ lands area. . Copy of your executed lease from the record owner MUST be submitted with this l.ffidavlt. BLMS/GSR 3/27/91) FILE COpy Sent By: dex 955; 8.; 12 Oct 02 0:15; Job 531 ;pege~ AftID1\V1T OF CONS'l'RUCTIQH Answer yes or no to the followinq questions as is applicable to your regi.terod faoility: X!! ~ -- das the .~tivity within subject area chanqed since the facility was re9istercd? [Note: If the activity has changed 0: there are new activities within the registe~ed area, ploase provide explanation in Comments Sections on paqe four.) (2)..Are there any NoN-water de~n4ent activities within subject area? [NOTE: If there are, please provide descriptionl explanation 1n comments Section on paga four]. _~ 11) -- ()l Has the tota1 square feet of state-owned lan~$ being used by the subject activity(!es) andlor structures increased? [NOTE: If the total square feet of Submerqed Lands you are ulino haa increased, please provide exPlanation in comments section on page four and submit a drawing of additional and/or altered structures.] (4 ) Have there been 8"Y alterations or additionc to th~ structure8(s) since the facility WAS ragistered? [NOTE: If yes, please provide e~planation in Comments Section on page tour and submit a drawing of additional and/or altered structures.] _. Water dependent activity means an activity which can only be conducted Oft, in, over, or adjacent to water area8 because the activity requires direct accesa to the water body or sovereignty lands for transportation. recreation, energy prodUction or transmission, or 8ourc~ of water, and where the use of the water or sovereionty la~. 1s an integral part of the activity. ANY OTHER ACTIVITY WOULD BE CONSIDERED NON-WATER DEPENDENT. tlpCRXP'rXON OF F"CILt'n I ACT;VI'l'Y Pleaae re.pond to the items checked below and provide the information requcs,.ed. (1) TYPe of facility [check as applicable): Commercial Marina Commercial Fiahing Docking Multi-use or condOll\inium Uplan~ Commercial Related J:)oCkl ng Marina Repair or Constru~tion Other (explain belowl ( ) (K ) c..... A-fo' . ... . f:)L.c.7A..~" ,. ,- 1-:6.....- ~ ^' ," ,1. l '-W_ ~t\.., ,. ,,... ~'"-. V ....~.1Jr..c... r-:) \.' .. - )10 ~')....J 8LMS/GS" 3127/90 (2) Sent By: dex 855; j'; 12 Oct 02 0:16; JOb 531 jpa~ (-1 ) ~'lthin the re9iatered area there is available (answer yes o~~o~ fuelin9 faoilitie. sewaq8 pwllpout beili ties .~afood pro~esslng facilit1es liveaboards c~pAbilitieB marina related sales facility other (exPlain below) ()) This facility is [Check one]: a. Open to the public on a first-come. first-served basia. ~ number of slips available: P. Available to owner-occupied multi-family buildint;J8 (1. e., condominium, townhouse, HQ! open to the public. I2lli number of available; . residential rental I and slips c. Same as "b" above, but with nQ less than 50\ open to the publie On a first-come, first-serve~ basis. Total nlmWer of slips available: (4) Shoreline Data [Answer yes A ______ a. Shoreline 18 75\ or more natural. b. The adjacant 1.000 feet on both sides of the registered area are in a natural, unbulkheaded, nonseawalled or nonriprapped condition. The Registrant aCknowle4Qes that by execution of thi$ document, if any information contained. within the Affidavit is false, the consent to use the state-owned submerged lands under the G:andfat~er Struoture Registration Program may be revoked, and U8. of subject state-owned submerged lands may be required to be brought un<ler lease. SIGNE~ ~~..J L-_____--~ Re ~strant/Authorized Agent Robert l~. ThOlll1'.on. PTesic1t!lIt 1 hereby certify as of Carlouel Yacht. Corporation *( enU ty) ~ffidavit .n4.~o operata strUcture Reqlstratlon. .State wbether an Individual, d./b/a, etc. (Tide) . that I am authorized to execute this the facili,ty..AS author1ud.~. sut>j.ectJiranQ.father /"- . -- Partnership~ corpora:~~ Trustee, Individual -_..M._......... BLMS/CSIl 3/27/90 (3) Sent By: dex 855; '''1 12 Oct 02 0:16; Job 531 ;page 414 . ST~~ or . .J1~ COUNTY OF P. ..I.~/J D b~ BeforQ me personallY appeared R. H . .~I. -- ^I\en . ~IL, . to me well known ao4 known to me to be the person WhO~~~~4 th~oreQoin9 Affidavit, a~d Acknowledoed to and before 1M that . 1. j exeouted sdd "f fidavi t for the purposes therein exPressed. WITNESS ~_hAnd an4 official seal, this ~ dAY of 1..D., 19~ 1J1J~ :.., I,,;' I:' \. 1 ' ,,~./ .' " -;, (SeAll: ,~ '. 0, ~t;1 ~lfhl. Nota PUbl.LC MOTA." MUC, nUll or n.omo\. My COI1I1IiSsion ExP1reM"~..f:~~ :~1. " ',' *.....***-_......***._*.*....*.......*....*..***...***********************- COMMEN'l'Sl aLMS/GIll 3/27/90 (4) .. .. City of Clearwater Development Services Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 ....--- PARCEL NUMBER ;( / .:L)l / J5 / 20/ I?--I / 0050 2 PROJECT/JOB NAME CO-rID u.e,/ y CV J1t Club 0 i= ~ PROJECT ADDRESS lDg/ (; ldoro..d 0 _Av~ ZIP CODE 23 3-+5-~ 0 0 ..J I- BUSINESS NAME PHONE 0 w ., LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 ~ 0 0- LOT BLOCKlTRACT SUBDIVISION ::a:; (") ~L/Io-q/~2 CD NAME (last name, first): PHONE C ~ w ~Ogl f-Idoy-ario Av-e. en 2 ADDRESS CD ~ 0 0 CITY STATE ZIP CODE ::J '< NAME PHONE - I-~ Ow ADDRESS FAX # ww 1-2 ~- 00 CITY STATE ZIP CODE ~2 ~w STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER CO. NAME Rer~) Ai'\a..rlne L1C. HOLDER --:R 't< PG~:S PHONE LJLI (.., ~ 29LJ:5 ~ 33:5 W{)or:! ll1 W{) Ave. --1?;~ - ~C)L3 0 ADDRESS FAX # I- 0 13eJlecu.:.v FL 33 -:f6 t:a ~ CITY STATE ZIP CODE ~ I- 2 0 STATE LICENSE # OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE # 0 PCCLB # C~4 Ig 2- CITY ISSUED BY 2 WHAT IS EXISTING BUILDING USE O()C~ (Single Family Residence, Office, Retail) 0 i= ~ WHAT IS PROPOSED BUILDING USE (Single Family Residence, Office, Retail) :::E ~ 0 u.. NUMBER OF LIVINGIBUSINESS UNITS FLOOD ZONE NUMBER OF STORIES ~ - ..J ~ BUILDING HEIGHT CON ST. TYPE I II III IV V VI PROTECTED? SPRINKLERED? - - w 2 SQUARE FOOTAGE:c:5DO LIVING COMMERCIAL w C) - GARAGE/CARPORT OTHER TOTAL PERMIT APPLICATION .5 541: ~ ~ ---=Cnsta, \ WD:: 0..0 8~ U) ." (.L .. \0' X. 25D' of'Ioa.-hr'l.1 dock PermitApplication Modified.doc FILE ~n" v \':;~ ~:,.) ,~, ;;' . JJ fit - IF FAX PERMIT PLEASE ENTER PROPERTY ADDRESS NATURE OF WORK (Check all that ENGINEERING apply) BUILDING ELECTRIC PLUMBING MECHANICAL GAS FIRE ROOFING LAND RESOURCES LANDSCAPING TRAFFIC ENGINEERING UTILITIES OTHER M&y\ ne. Co (lS'1YtJC.fl 0 l\ TYPE OF WORK~ ADDITION VALUATION $?) lo DO O. -- J REMODEL OTHER DEMOLITION DRC CDB NOT-APPLICABLE CASE # FL or FLS___________(circle one) DATE: NOT-APPLICABLE DENIED APPROVED . Anyone planning to do excavation work, must notify the one-call "CALL SUNSHINE" Notification Center at 1-800-432-4770 prior to any excavation work being done, in order to prevent underground damage. Federal D.O.T. Regulation Part 192, Sections 192.614 and 192.707. Application is hereby made to obtain a permit to do the work and installation as indicated. I certify that no work or installation has commenced prior to the issuance of a permit and that all work will be performed to meet the standards of all laws regulating construction in this jurisdiction. CERTIFICATION I HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL ASBESTOS REGULATIONS CONCERNING NOTIFICATION OF THE PROPER AUTHORITIES OF THE PROPOSED DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION PROJECTS. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. I am aware of Florida and Federal Accessibility Codes, and I certify that I have met the requirements of both. I certify that, this application together with any plans submitted is accurate and represents all work being done at this time. All work will be done in compliance with all applicable laws regulating construction and zoning and if not I realize I am responsible for the removal of any construction in violation of these laws or regulations. Any deviation from information submitted, unless approved by the Building Official will ~~~rm~_________________ Signature of license holder ___:r;~~~___~~~~____________ Print name \ 0 - -z...~ -o"Z--- Date OFFICE USE ONLY ZONING FRONT SETBACK: ATLAS PAGE LAND USE SIDE SETBACK BUILDING HEIGHT REAR SETBACK TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE (Calculation by the City) PermitApplication Modified.doc o :to :rJ r- o c m r- -< :to o :J: -l o r- C tlI o ~ m 8 JJ )> is )> < m z c m () r m )> JJ ! m JJ OJ m fi .r. "T1 r I:l -.,. ~ u f } GA J o ~ -::l - ~. ~ c::#- . I ')-J )J () t :J: D m r' () ^ ~ ~ 0 0 -~ -J C) -J ~\ -J to D 0 - I ,.' . . FLD2002-10033 1091 ELDORADO AVE Date Received: 10/24/2002 CARLOUELYACHTCLUB ZONING DISTRICT: I LAND USE: INS ATLAS PAGE: 227A ~ A I~ ,"W~~ rK"~ Ct<. NO. 0 CY11') '1 ~ DATE 10- 2.~-2. 2. 5/vJ flL' r c", ',', '\y' ... '.,J~~ CL WCoverSheet f " e e CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 28, 2003 Mr. Robert Thompson 1237 South Myrtle Avenue, Suite 301 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Development Order regarding Case FLD2002-10033 at 1091 Eldorado Avenue (Carlouel Yacht Club) Dear Mr. Thompson: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your application for Flexible Development for the construction ofa commercial dock (10 feet long by 250 feet wide floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in the side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601 in association with the Carlouel Yacht Club. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria under the provlSlons of Section 3-601. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general applicability criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The dock development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department for new and existing docks prior to the issuance of building permits. Plans prepared and sealed by a professional engineer must be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new dock; 2. That the floating dock be for the exclusive use by members and guests of the Carlouel Yacht Club, that boats moored be transient and that there be no commercial activities at the docks (bait sales, vending, etc.); and 3. That floating and dock -supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" I. e e January 28,2003 Thompson - Page 2 Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (January 21,2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on February 4,2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, ~'~~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning Director Cc: Darlene Ress, Ress Marine Construction \\MS5c\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXilnactive or Finished ApplicationslEldorado 1091 Carlouel Yacht Club- ApprovedlEldorado 1091 Development Order. doc , LL . o f- - U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~ ber-t 7l1trnp s f1h FAX: "#-7, (J S"2-4- Phone: 4- t & - z, Z-O 0 FROM: W{rV- Neflr Phone:~(;'Z-4so4- DATE::.-J/-f7/03 RE: Co..rlo~~1 (A.ck+__CJJ~ s ~ 1....' 4.TtJ +- NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) /0 A RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 01/17/2003 12:18 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 01/17 12:12 94476524 00:05:05 11 OK ST At'mARD ECM . . ~(~~~ ,~~#"o~.n'\;. '~~.~~g{~ ~~ - - -' ..o::t:~ ~r::" ===- -~~ ';l.~ = ii;:! ';.~~~~ ,~\\'}~ CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 13, 2003 Mr. Robert Thompson 1237 South Myrtle Avenue, Suite 301 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development approval (FLD2002-10033) for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Dear Mr. Thompson: The Flexible Development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601, for property located at 1091 Eldorado Avenue has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on January 21,2003. The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, WlXJI'L t1. k>~ Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Darlene Ress, Ress Marine Construction \\MS5c\PDSIPlanning Department\C D BIFLEXlPending cases\Reviewed and PendinglEldorado 1091 Carlouel Yacht ClublEldorado 1091 BRIAN]. A~~qffl{'i'4~1COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" RessMarine~ . 435 Woodlawn Avenue Belleair, FL 33756 November 4, 2002 Mr. Wayne Wells Senior Planner - City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 337584748 RE: Response to letter dated October 20, 2002 for Flexible Development Approval 2002-10033. Dear Wayne: Attached please find the information that you requested to complete the above referenced FLD application. 1. Attached is a large scale site plan for your review. 2. Please note that under "Dimensional Standard, ii. Length" the correct response should read... 'There are no tie poles proposed beyond the new floating dock installation" 3. The "Dimensional Standards, iii. Width" of the proposed dock and existing dock is 471' wide or approximately 71 % of the property's waterfront width, which is still an acceptable dimension. 4. There will be approximately 18-20 mooring spaces available for member and guest boats at one time. This figure is based on the average size boat being 30 feet bow to stem and allowing for space between vessels. 5. The square footage and acreage of the upland portion of the property is listed on page tVv'O the survey that was provided. Should you need any other information, please let me know and I will get it to you as soon as possible. Sincerely, /p~ 0 ~ m < om _r- tru1I -40 -< '"0 ~ o~ <W ..m <: z 0-4 @ r-(/) - mm ~ c:::J >:D :D< I ES ~- >0 -4m @ men :Do m l .J -0 -4 Darlene Ress Ress Marine Construction lOOl '~~ JaqwaAoN l aBed . . . CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 30, 2002 Mr. Robert Thompson 1237 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite #301 Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Flexible Development approval (FLD2002-10033) for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, at 1091 Eldorado Avenue, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Dear Mr. Thompson: The Planning staff has reviewed your Flexible Development application for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, at 1091. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete, pending the submission of the following: 1. Provide a site plan at a larger scale showing the proposed dock in sufficient detail for review purposes, including dimensions of the dock and the setback from the north property line extended (potentially at the same scale as the survey). The site plan submitted is not clear and hard to read due to the scale of the drawing. 2. The response under "Dimensional Standards, ii. Length" states that "There are now new tie poles proposed beyond the new floating dock installation." It is unclear whether "now" means "no." Please advise. 3. Under "Dimensional Standards, iii. Width" the existing docks need to be included in the calculation of width. From my calculations, the width of existing and proposed docks appears to be approximately 440 feet. Advise/revise. 4. Between the existing and proposed docks, how many member and guest boats can moor at this facility at anyone time. 5. Provide the square footage and acreage of the upland portion ofthe property. Responses to the above would be helpful at the DRC meeting, but must be included in the resubmission packets for the CDB by the date below. BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . 1 October 30, 2002 Thompson - Page two The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2002-10033. The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on November 14, 2002, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Additional comments and requirements may result from that meeting. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. Please be aware that 15 additional sets of the complete resubmittal of all required information, to include copies of the application, survey, site plan (with any required changes as applicable), affidavit of authorization, etc. will be required by November 15, 2002, in order to be placed on the December 17,2002, Community Development Board (CDB) agenda. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely yours, W<L4~ K,W~ WayneM. Wells, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Ress Marine \ IMS5clPDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next DRCIEldorado 1091 Carlouel Yacht ClublEldorado 1091 Complete Letter.doc . . CDB Meeting Date: January 21. 2003 Case Number: FLD2002-10033 Agenda Item: D8 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: LOCATION: REQUEST: PLANS REVIEWED: SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: DIMENSIONS OF SITE: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: PLAN CATEGORY: ZONING DISTRICT: Carlouel Yacht Club. Mr. Robert Thompson. 1091 Eldorado Avenue. Flexible Development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet long by 250 feet wide floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in the side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Site plan submitted by Gardener Collins, P.E. 2.9 acres; 126,225 square feet (east of Eldorado Avenue only). Waterfront property line along east is 665 feet in width. Carlouel Yacht Club, with a dock of 12 boat slips Carlouel Yacht Club, with an existing dock of 12 boat slips, and a proposed 10-foot long by 250-foot wide floating dock on the north side of the property located four feet from the seawall. I, Institutional Classification I, Institutional District ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family dwellings West: Single-family dwellings East: Clearwater Bay South: Single-family dwellings Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-1 0033 Page 1 e . CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: The 2.9-acre site is located on the east side of Eldorado Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of Bay Esplanade. The site is currently developed with the Carlouel Yacht Club. The surrounding area is characterized by single-family dwellings. The site currently contains a dock of 12 slips, approximately in the center of the waterfront property. The applicant seeks to construct a floating dock adjacent to the seawall along the northern portion of their property for use by members and guests of the Carlouel Yacht Club to moor their boats while visiting the Club. The 10-foot long by 250-foot wide floating dock will be located so that moored boats will be no closer than 14 feet from the seawall. This floating dock will only be used for transient mooring, not for permanent mooring of vessels. This area is currently used for the anchorage of vessels. The floating dock will enable more members of the Club to safely moor their vessels to a dock for accessing the upland land area of the Club, rather than having to anchor their vessels and use a small boat to ferry persons over to the existing dock to access the site. Approximately 18-20 mooring spaces will be available with the floating dock, based on the average boat size of 30 feet (bow to stem plus space between vessels). The proposed dock will replace the existing tie pilings farther from the existing seawall than the proposed dock. The proposed dock is proportionally compatible with the other docks within the neighborhood. There will be no adverse impact upon the recreational or commercial use of the waterway and the dock does not impose any navigational hazards. Studies provided by the applicant do not indicate any evidence of marine sea grass within the area of the proposed floating dock. Since the Club is adjacent to single-family dwellings the commercial dock is required to locate within the center one-third of the property. The applicant is requesting a setback reduction on the north side from 221.67 feet to six feet for the proposed floating dock. The single-family lot directly to the north does not have the physical dwelling on it, rather it is on the west side of Eldorado Avenue and their dock is on the east side of Eldorado Avenue. The dock for the single- family lot to the south is at an approximate zero setback to the common property line. The proposed dock (including the existing fixed slips) is proportional to its upland waterfront lot width, in harmony with the scale and character of the surrounding single-family docks. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the floating dock, the applicant will need to show compliance with National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) standards for "marinas and boat yards" for the construction and operation of the docking facilities to provide fire protection of boats moored at this floating dock and the existing dock. Plans prepared and sealed by a professional engineer will be required for issuance of a building permit. Floating and dock supported signage will need to be permanently installed warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10033 Page 2 . . A. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3-601.C: STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? SETBACKS One third ofthe North: 271 feet North: six feet Yes * minimum waterfront South: 203 feet (new floating property width dock) (665 feet width; South: 203 feet 221.67 feet (existing dock) setback required) LENGTH 75 percent of the 30 feet 14 feet (new Yes maximum width of the floating dock) property (498.75 feet) WIDTH 75 percent of the 183 feet 464 feet Yes maximum width of the property (498.75 feet) * Reduction requested on north side. B. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL DOCKS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3-601.C.3: 1. Use and Compatibility. a) The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort, convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use of the property. The proposed floating dock will be used by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club to moor their boats while visiting the Club. This floating dock will only be used for transient mooring, not for permanent mooring of vessels. The floating dock will enable more members of the Club to moor their vessels to a dock for accessing the upland land area of the Club, rather than having to anchor their vessels and use a small boat to ferry persons over to the existing dock to access the site. b) The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. The proposed dock is in harmony with the scale and character of the Yacht Club, which has a 665-foot waterfront lot width and much greater than surrounding single-family lot widths. The Code allows commercial docks to be a maximum of 75 percent of the waterfront lot width. Including the existing docks, the proposed width is less than the 75 percent maximum. Since the Club is adjacent to single-family dwelling parcels, the Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10033 Page 3 e e commercial dock is required to locate within the center one-third of the property. The applicant is requesting a reduction of this setback requirement to allow the floating dock adj acent to the northern seawall, in deference to extending the proposed dock out into the water. The single-family lot directly to the north does not have the physical dwelling on it, rather the dwelling is on the west side of Eldorado Avenue and their dock is on the east side of Eldorado Avenue. The dock for the single-family lot to the south is at an approximate zero setback to the common property line. The proposed dock (including the existing fixed slips) is proportional to its upland waterfront lot width, in harmony with the scale and character of the surrounding single-family docks. c) The proposed dock shall be compatible with dock patterns in the general vicinity. The Club is located within a large single-family area. The Club is a unique circumstance not generally found within the community. The Club also has a much greater waterfront lot width than the single-family lots within the vicinity. Most docks, obviously, in the vicinity are in a length, width and set back in relation to the single- family character of those lots. The proposed dock is proportionally compatible with the other docks within the neighborhood. 2. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats. The purpose of the proposed floating dock is to facilitate the safe dockage of vessels visiting the Club. The 10 feet wide dock will be located so that moored boats will be no closer than 14 feet from the seawall. The proposed dock will replace the existing tie pilings further from the existing seawall than the proposed dock. There will be no adverse impact upon the recreational or commercial use of the waterway and the dock does not impose any navigational hazards. 3. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation, transportation, recreational or other public conveniences. The adjacent channel is over 350 feet in width from the Club's seawall to the grass flats to the east. The proposed east side of the dock will be 14 feet off the seawall, which will not impede navigation on the channel. The Harbor Master has determined this proposed dock will not impose any navigational hazards. 4. Impacts on Marine Environment. a) Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to marine grassbeds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10033 Page 4 e e Studies provided by the applicant do not indicate any evidence of marine sea grass within the area of the proposed floating dock. Water depth of a minimum of four feet at mean low water supports the absence of sea grasses. Water visibility was less than three feet, prohibiting adequate filtering of essential sunlight for aquatic vegetation propagation. Signage shall be installed to warn boaters of grass beds and manatees in the area. b) Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitat. There is a deep-water channel running between the applicant's seawall and a wide sea grass bed and mangrove island estuarine type environment over 350 feet to the east. The proposed dock is located a safe distance from this natural marine habitat, grass flats or marine life and, therefore, does not pose any adverse impacts. Studies provided by the applicant do not indicate any evidence of hard-bottom communities (e.g., oysters, soft corals, bryozoans, and tunicates) within the area of the proposed dock. 5. Impacts on Water Quality. a) All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any other area associated with a dock shall have adequate circulation and existing water depths to ensure that a minimum of a one foot clearance is provided between the lowest member of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the waterbody at mean or ordinary low water (-0.95 NGVD datum). Water depths of no less than four feet at mean low water at the seawall along the entire width of the proposed dock. Boats moored at this proposed floating dock will be no closer than 14 feet to the seawall. This area is currently used for the anchorage of vessels. Existing tie poles will be removed with the construction of this proposed dock. Water depths increase from the seawall eastward toward the centerline of the navigable channel. Water depths will continue to be adequate. b) The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to be located. The entire waterfront width of the applicant's property is seawalled. The proposed floating dock will not affect erosion, storm drainage or water quality. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10033 Page 5 . e 6. Impacts on Natural Resources. a) The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest. Studies provided by the applicant do not indicate any evidence of hard-bottom communities (e.g., oysters, soft corals, bryozoans, and tunicates) within the area of the proposed dock. Proposed anchors for the floating dock will support the attachment and growth of plant and animal life that will be beneficial to the marine environment. Studies also do not indicate any evidence of marine sea grass within the area of the proposed floating dock. The entire waterfront width of the applicant's property is seawalled. b) The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird sanctuaries. There is a deep-water channel running between the applicant's seawall and a wide sea grass bed and mangrove island estuarine type environment over 350 feet to the east. The proposed dock is located a safe distance from this natural marine habitat, grass flats or marine life and, therefore, does not pose any adverse impacts. Studies provided by the applicant do not indicate any evidence of hard-bottom communities (e.g., oysters, soft corals, bryozoans, and tunicates) within the area of the proposed dock. 7. Impacts on Wetlands HabitatJUplands. The dock shall not have a material adverse affect upon the uplands surrounding. There are no wetland or upland habitats in the vicinity of the subject site, therefore, there will be no adverse impacts to these communities. C. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10033 Page 6 . . The surrounding area is characterized by single-family dwellings. Surrounding, waterfront properties have been developed with docks, although smaller in sizeand scale as the proposed floating dock. This is due to the size of the subject property involved, versus the smaller surrounding sites. The proposed dock (including the existing fixed slips) is proportional to its upland waterfront lot width, in harmony with the scale and character of the surrounding single-family docks. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site is zoned Institutional District and the proposed development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The proposed floating dock will be used by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club to moor their boats while visiting the Club. This floating dock will only be used for transient mooring, not for permanent mooring of vessels. The floating dock will enable more members of the Club to moor their vessels to a dock for accessing the upland land area of the Club, rather than having to anchor their vessels and use a small boat to ferry persons over to the existing dock to access the site. The proposed dock is proportionally compatible with the other docks within the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed floating dock will be used by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club to moor their boats while visiting the Club. This floating dock will only be used for transient mooring, not for permanent mooring of vessels. The proposed dock should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development will be accessory in nature to the Carlouel Yacht Club and will have no impact on vehicular traffic in the area. The proposed floating dock will be used by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club to moor their boats while visiting the Club. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed dock is in harmony with the scale and character of the Yacht Club, which has a 665-foot waterfront lot width and much greater than surrounding single-family lot widths. The Code allows commercial docks to be a maximum of 75 percent of the waterfront lot width. Including the existing docks, the proposed width is less than the 75 percent maximum. Since the Club is adjacent to single-family dwelling parcels, the commercial dock is required to locate within the center one-third of the property. The applicant is requesting a reduction of this setback requirement to allow the floating dock adjacent to the northern seawall, in deference to extending the proposed dock out into the water. The single-family lot directly to the north does not have the physical dwelling on it, rather the Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-1 0033 Page 7 . . dwelling is on the west side of Eldorado Avenue and their dock is on the east side of Eldorado Avenue. The dock for the single-family lot to the south is at an approximate zero setback to the common property line. The proposed dock (including the existing fixed slips) is proportional to its upland waterfront lot width, in harmony with the scale and character of the surrounding single-family docks. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposal includes the construction of a commercial dock in association with the Carlouel Yacht Club. The proposed floating dock will be used by members and guests of the Carlouel Yacht Club to moor their boats while visiting the Club and there should be no adverse effects generated by the proposed floating dock. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 14, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet long by 250 feet wide floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in the side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601 for the site at 1091 Eldorado Avenue, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria under the provisions of Section 3-601. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general applicability criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The dock development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards" be met to the satisfaction ofthe Fire Department for new and existing docks prior to the issuance of building permits. Plans prepared and sealed by a professional engineer must be submitted and approved by the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new dock; 2. That the floating dock be for the exclusive use by members and guests of the Carlouel Yacht Club, that boats moored be transient and that there be no commercial activities at the docks (bait sales, vending, etc.); and 3. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10033 Page 8 . . ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application \IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglEldorado 1091 Carlouel Yacht ClublEldorado 1091 Staff Report. doc Staff Report- Community Development Board- January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10033 Page 9 . View looking north from south side of proposed dock View looking north from south side of existing dock ,. . - - - - . - -I View looking north from north side of proposed dock 1091 Eldorado Avenue FLD2002-10033 View looking south from north side of proposed dock View looking north at existing dock 1 e e Owner: I Carlouel Yacht Club Site: [1091 Eldorado Avenue PROJECT SITE LOCATION MAP Case: Property Size(Acres) : FLD2002- 10033 2.9 PIN: 32/28/15/54720/171/0050 I Atlas Page: I 227A & 238A e e ~. f' "' J. ~ "'. , ..~ . \\. ;'t;. .r} " .' .i Ii . ~ I+. . ..... ... Jt'i. L ~ ... 1-. . , . . ~ ~~. . AERIAL MAP Owner. I Cartouel Yacht Club Site: 1091 Eldorado Avenue I Case: Property SizelAcres): FLD2002- 10033 2.9 PIN: 32/28/15/54720/171/0050 Atlas Page: 227A & 238A OS/R @ Owner: I Car/ouel Yacht Club Site: 1091 Eldorado Avenue e e 1091 1088 1086 I p 1078 1076 1062 1058 1f)oH 1043 1040 1038 1041 ZONING MAP I Case: Property Size (Acres) : FLD2002-10033 2.9 PIN: 32/28/15/54720/171/0050 I Atlas Page: 227 A & 238A . . EXISTING SURROUNDING USES I @1r -.- Owner. I Carlouel Yacht Club 11091 Eldorado Avenue Site: Case: FLD2002-10033 Property Size(Acres) : 2.9 PIN: 32/28/15/54720/171/0050 Atlas Page: 1 227A & 238A . ...... ::E . . ~ 0 a1 i> 0 <r.: N r- OIl .;; -- c:'! !a .= 0\ " -- 00 ..c < - 1;: ;t: <.) .. 00 0 U tI) :3 '+-< 0 ~ t;j s:: ~ 0 ] tI) ~ s:: 8 OIl 'e a:l .~ ~ <.) ~ 1;; F: 0 ~ Z N '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CZl 0 ~I N ~ N CZl ~ ~ N ~ ~ CZl N CZl 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ CZl ~ N -- -- ~ -- ~ -- ~ N ~ -- N "<1" N N "<1" "<1" ~ N "<1" 00 ::E ::E -- ::E - ~ ...... ...... N ~ N ...... ~ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ...... 0 - - 0 0 - - 0 - ::E .....:l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E-o = f'f") W ul ::E ::E ~ ~ ::E .... f'f") > ... 0 r.f.l 0 <( .... ~ ~ I 0 N C M ~o ~ '+-< ...0 0 .... N > 9 0 0 .... 0 ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CJ ...J ~ < ~ w Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ - 0 0 0 0 0 0 C') r.f.l ~ 0 eo: fI.l - U = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U s:: s:: s:: s:: s:: s:: ~ s:: ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z z ::r: z ::r: ::r: N '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ -- N 00 N N 0 -- N -- ...... ...... ...... N ...... ...... -- -- -- -- -- ...... ...... ...... 0 ...... ...... M ~ ... 0: Q '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... -- 0: "<1" "<1" "<1" "<1" "<1" "<1" "<1" "<1" "<1" "<1" Q ~ ~ N ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ -- -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.. tI) .S 0 tI) .... 0 s:: ... ~ '"0 ~ s:: <.) ~ .9 ~ 0 0 OJ} 0 S- o ..d ... '"0 ... .;: .;: <.) s:: 0 ... <.) ~ :::.:::..; ~ ~ '13 ]- ;:l 0 "5 ...... 0 0 ~~I ~ t:: :3 ~ U U ~ .D '"0 >.. '"0 -; ~ OJ} OJ} <r.: 0 0 <+-< '2 tI) u ~ 0 u s:: = ... ~ '"0 ~ 0 ..... ''; ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 E-o 0 0 s 0 ::E .... OJ} > u 0 .... CZl U ~ ~ 'iI) ~ .S ;:l s:: .... 0 .... .S 0 s:: 0 d '"0 <+-< OJ} u ~ t:: t:: 0 g. tI) u ~ 0 ;:;::: ~ 0 ~ u .... 0 0 ~ s:: 0 0 0 ~ ::E .... 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ .....:l 0 .....:l O~ > ~ 0 0 V") V") 0 "<1" 00 0 \0 V") -0 r- oo "<1" ...... r'l "<1" - r'l ...... ...... u 0 0 N N N N 0 - 0 0 t- o 0 <r.: <r.: <r.: <r.: <r.: <r.: <r.: <r.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . M ~ .~ . ~ 0 6 0 -< i- N 00 u:: '\:: ';; --- c:--! p.. - 0\ o<l (") a <.) --- 00 -< - ;1: ..sgA:; ~ '" 00 '~~ ~ u i3~f-< laZU'l ~..s6 g '~ ~ "'c:l >. 0 v~"'<:: ..s g- u: o 0 ~ ~ ...... U Ia ~fS >. p.. (;j 0' g. ~ 0 ~ '" 0 co -g I:l '"8 "'c:l (;j v ~ "'c:l ~ E : .8 v 8 o<l ...... ,5 '~ ~ ~J~~~ ...... ~ ...... 0 ~~<8!JU o<l "'c:l.... ~ {;l Ia co ~ ,-lii "'c:l Q ~ efrBUo p.,Q(J),gz ''l ''l ''l ''l ''l ''l 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 p., 0 p.. 0 co 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ N ~ U ~ N 0 ~ f-< f-< --- -< .....,1 ~ --- N ~ N ~ - '" - N ~ --- ~ 0 ~ - M co ~ M 0 ...... 0\ M --- --- --- --- --- --- ...... 0 N 0 ...... - 0 ~ co u ~ Cl ~ U) ~ -< .....,1 ....., ~ = ~ ~ co 0 f-< ~ W ... ~ ...... Q rI} Q ... ~ ~ I 0 N 0 (") ~ Q ~ '+-< ...... Q 0 ... N N ... 9 0 v ... 0 ~ ...... ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c:J ~ ....I p., < w Z Z .....:l Z 6 Z Z ~ .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ (I') 0 0 :r: 0 0 0 0 rI} CLl 0 ~ rI) .... U = v v v v v v v U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ''l ''l ''l ''l ''l ''l 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ --- N N ...... '" ...... N --- '<:t ...... M N M ...... '" ~ --- --- --- --- --- --- ...... 0 N 0 ...... ...... 0 ''l ''l ''l ''l ''l ''l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ N N ~ --- --- '<:t '<:t '<:t '<:t '<:t '<:t ~ N N ~ ~ ~ --- --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ v "'0 ';;: ~ ~ ~ v ~ v v v ;> :::.::: ' .;;: ';;: ';;: 'v '-' v v v v u ~~I u p::: ~ p::: v !3 .... .... ~ u v ~ 0 v ...... ...... Q) Q) '" 0 '" 0:1 ';;: p::: 0:1 ,~ ',C Q) ~ ~ '" 0:1 p::: ~ <><l :> ,~ "'0 ~ ~ P.. a Q) v 0 .!:l .... '0 ...... p.. ...... 0:1 U5 .....:l U) ~ p.. U) -< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -", VI - N M '<:t '<:t - '-' 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 t- o 0 0 0 0 -< -< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... OJ) = ~ w .... ~ ~ ...... = fI.l = .... ..... '1:l ~ I 0 '" N 0 ~ 0 cg c:! or;; . E-o .. .... N < > 9 0 .... 0 ...... Q,>.I.l Cj ~ ..J -< W .. Z .. .- 0 QJ ::Jt: .... ~. Q en fI.l ~ 0 ~ fI'J .... U = u r") :::E g <r; N t'-- Oi N ::::. 00 ;t: 00 ~~I -0 '-' ~ €,.g] .~..] 6 ~ R~ '" -.s - .g ~ ~ '€ ~ 8~~ ~_] g g?gB: ,8. 0. 0.1l)= ~oP ~~~ 2E~ 8 .e '€ ~.s 6 >- ~ .~ S 12 >ll 'p ] 0.~0..1l) --:.Bo5 ~8g 1::1l)0. 1l)..2 I':: Il) .g := ~ Il) Il) ~ ~ ~ s::: ;::S o5UIl)..r:: o~ ~ ~ 001l) '"'~.....~ ..".. =-20 _~..r:: 00'''' = .. cQ ~ 8. -.... - "'..... .6iS~~ ~oH ~~Od~ij~ ~ Q.g ~ ~ ] 6. u ~! t~ -g ~ ~ ';i:"~"t;j CZll!B ,o~i)~~a3 ..g ;::S ~ ilol - - 8." := 1'::0 I':: .. 13 T, r: ~ o.~ 1::- ~ .- .- ~.~.. a a fA ~ i 1J! -g 6 .~ .::: ~.~ 00 ~ ~ 'H ~ Il) o:s.- ..... ~ - I':: --" ..... .. <:: .... .~ Il) Il) .. ~ = ....;::S .- """ 0 .- o:s ~ ~~o505~ EIl)8 .{3~.~ '6..91l) ~....~~~ .Sl'::~dij~~~~t;j~ <SI'::>- ....::>O:S.......Il)'-<+=iij....+> I <<l _ <<l;::::"O ~ 15 - .~ V105 0 0 ~ 0 , t;j .-..::.: <<l I':: - I':: ta ~ Oil ..r:: ~ 00 <S co 1'::!8~~ ~Il)!<<ll'::.e~ .6 Il) C s~~6~ ]~._Il).~13.-b~ijt;j u O'.....Il)"Oo ;::S1l)..::.:~<::~~2:<o;::S 0 ~~ 605S.:S ,Il) ~ 8;;;, g;::s~ Sll ~.. fl~~ ~._._,- Soo..~~-~-..I::-- "'0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .6 [r- 00 =, 6 .5 If'g..s ..8 .s R-a , Il) ;::S I':: <:: iil ~ .. .......13 0 = Il) 0 .... 6 ..... Il) 0 Il) N~"OU ~Il)~<<ll'::~~. o.U"~~> e.~6.~~ij~~o5o~~.s~~~g.~~0 2~~~~~~~~~ij5~]~~:~~~ .... ,8._ I':: .-;:: '- ,E u ilol ,~~ 0 ,<:: ,,-::;: --~~~~OMooC~~~~~~~~O~ t;j~- ~ i- .....l..si:o :~ <Zlll)~~ :;: ::E 1'3 .~ "E ill .s;o..sjg oj u <:: .6 6 6 o .. ~ .~ 6 (), ~ 'E .~ gj ~ c:: > 5b.... '~~ a3 Wf ~ <::'-....0 o_~oo ,- ~ td. l=: >..::.:~~~ .!:! 8 ..... &l Il.l ~ ~ ~ 0 5 ~ <+=i._ go oll.l\O] 6. g ~ ij .- '- .0005150 gf a3 .. go.€ .~ t;j 1J ~ 'B 0.5 Il) ,.~ -5l-~13 Il) ~ .. .!:l .6 - ..s;::S>- ~ 0 fr ar .-;:: 6.Z~.... B ~O\.....BE Il.l N U - E Il.l 0\ t;j r;:: 8 Z ~ ~ ~ '" '" 0 0 r") 0 p... 0 8~ ~ N ~ E-< --- E-<I N :::E 0 ~~ - ~ --- --- .- N .- p... ~ ~ E-< :::E E-< ~ ~ M '- 0 M Il) >.I.l >.I.l >.I.l ~ Z z 6 p... 0 0 Q Q Q U U 11) 1=: 1=: 1=: 0 0 0 Z Z Z '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ N 0\ N .- .... .... --- --- --- .... N N N '" - ~ ~ '" o o N --- "<t N --- o '" '" '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ "<t "<t "<t ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 11) U U '> '> '> 11) U 11) ~ ~ ~ -;; .... 11) 00 i:l - .S .. U ~ ~ ~ :::E 0 0 .... .. 0 "Cl .... 1=: '> -e ~ 1=: <<l .....:l >.I.l ::r: "<t N 0 .- "<t 0\ 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q .....:l .....:l .....:l ~ ~ ~ :::.:: '-' ~ 11) ';> 11) ~ OJ) I':: '2 o N N .... o Q Q .....:l ~ --, , . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Martens, Cory Friday, December 20, 2002 5:24 PM Wells, Wayne RE: FLD2002-10033, Carlouel Yacht Club dock, 1091 Eldorado Avenue Traffic - no changes. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:41 AM To: Finch, Terry; Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone, Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie Subject: FLD2002-10033, Carlouel Yacht Club dock, 1091 Eldorado Avenue Revised plans have come in. A copy of the re-submittal is on the cabinets behind my desk by Rm. 216. Please take a look at this re-submittal and change your comments as necessary in Permit Plan. Please let me know if they are ok or not via email. Terry - Please take a close look at this, as you had the most severe comment. I will bring up a copy of the re-submittal to you ASAP. Review comments from the 11/14/02 DRC are below. We are trying to determine whether this item will go onto the next COB meeting. Please, however realizing this is the Christmas season, I really need to know from you by Monday, Dec. 23, 2002, in the AM. Thanks, Wayne 4:00 p.m. Case: FLD2002-10033 - 1091 Eldorado Avenue Owner/Applicant: Carlouel Yacht Club. Representative: Robert Thompson. Location: The .acre site is located on the east side of Eldorado Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of Bay Esplanade. Atlas Page: 227 A & 238A. Zoning: I, Institutional District. Request: Flexible Development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Proposed use: Floating dock. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Beverley Buysse, Glen Bahnick, Terry Finch and Joe Colbert Applicant/Representative: Bob Thompson, Darlene Ress and Bill Albright The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Plannine: a) Provide a site plan at a larger scale showing the proposed dock in sufficient detail for review purposes, including dimensions of the dock and the setback from the north property line extended (potentially at the same scale as the survey). The site plan submitted is not clear and hard to read due to the scale of the drawing. b) The response under "Dimensional Standards, ii. Length" states "There are now new tie poles proposed beyond the new floating dock installation." It is unclear whether "now" means "no." Please advise. c) Under "Dimensional Standards, iii. Width" the existing docks need to be included in the calculation of width. From my calculations, the width of existing and proposed docks appears to be approximately 440 feet. Advise/revise. d) Between the existing and proposed docks, how many member and guest boats can moor at this facility at anyone time. e) Provide the square footage and acreage of the upland portion of the property. 2. Traffic eneineerine: 1 , .. 3. a) No comments Stormwater: a) No comments Solid waste: a) No comments Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 6. Landscaoine: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments Harbor Master: a) Not a hazard to navigation would have to meet County criteria for sea grass. 9. Fire: a) . . 4. 5. 8. 10. Provide a Fire Line water supply to the docks area with a Fire Department hose connection OR comply with NFP A 303 Standard for Marinas and Boatyards. Show on Site Plan prior to CDB review. Environmental: a) Need profile showing bottom elevations in relation to MSL (1929 NGVD) in area of new dock. If elevations indicate that water depths are less than 6 feet deep, sea grass/benthic survey will be required prior to review by CDB. General eneineerine: a) No comments 11. NOTES: . 15 sets of everything to be submitted to Staff by November 18,2002 in order to be scheduled for a December 17, 2002 CDB meeting. . Send comments to Darlene at ressmarine@aol.com <mailto:ressmarine@aol.com>. DRAFT CONDITIONS: 1. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 2. That boats moored at these docks be for the exclusive use by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club and that there be no commercial activities at the docks (bait sales, vending, etc.); 3. That the proposed dock be used for the sole use by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club and not be permitted to be sub- leased; and 4. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. 2 -' ... 4:00 p.m. Case: FLD2002-10033.91 Eldorado Avenue . Owner/Applicant: Carlouel Yacht Club. Representative: Robert Thompson. Location: The .acre site is located on the east side of Eldorado Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of Bay Esplanade. Atlas Page: 227A & 238A. Zoning: I, Institutional District. Request: Flexible Development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to six feet, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Proposed use: Floating dock. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Beverley Buysse, Glen Bahnick, Terry Finch and Joe Colbert Applicant/Representative: Bob Thompson, Darlene Ress and Bill Albright The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Planninl?:: a) Provide a site plan at a larger scale showing the proposed dock in sufficient detail for review purposes, including dimensions of the dock and the setback from the north property line extended (potentially at the same scale as the survey). The site plan submitted is not clear and hard to read due to the scale of the drawing. b) The response under "Dimensional Standards, ii. Length" states "There are now new tie poles proposed beyond the new floating dock installation." It is unclear whether "now" means "no." Please advise. c) Under "Dimensional Standards, iii. Width" the existing docks need to be included in the calculation of width. From my calculations, the width of existing and proposed docks appears to be approximately 440 feet. Advise/revise. d) Between the existing and proposed docks, how many member and guest boats can moor at this facility at anyone time. e) Provide the square footage and acreage of the upland portion of the property. 2. Traffic enl?:ineerinl?:: a) No comments 3. Stormwater: a) No comments 4. Solid waste: a) No comments 5. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 6. Landscapinl?:: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Harbor Master: a) Not a hazard to navigation would have to meet County criteria for sea grass. 9. Fire: a) Provide a Fire Line water supply to the docks area with a Fire Department hose connection OR co~ply with NFP A 303 Standard for Marinas and Boat yards. Show on Site Plan prior to CDB reVIew. 10. Environmental: a) Need profile showing bottom elevations in relation to MSL (1929 NGVD) in area of new dock. If elevations indicate that water depths are less than 6 feet deep, sea grass/benthic survey will be required prior to review by CDB. 11. General enl?:ineerinl?:: a) No comments Draft DRC agenda - November 14, 2002 - Page 28 ) .. . . NOTES: . 15 sets of everything to be submitted to Staff by November 18,2002 in order to be scheduled for a December 17,2002 CDB meeting. . Send comments to Darlene at ressmarine@aol.com. DRAFT CONDITIONS: 1. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. 2. That boats moored at these docks be for the exclusive use by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club and that there be no commercial activities at the docks (bait sales, vending, etc.); 3. That the proposed dock be used for the sole use by members of the Carlouel Yacht Club and not be permitted to be sub-leased; and 4. That floating and dock-supported signage be permanently installed containing wording warning boaters of the existence of protected sea grasses and manatees in the vicinity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Draft DRC agenda - November 14, 2002 - Page 29 ! . .~.. . Community Respon\se Team Planning Oept. Case~ - ORC Case No.,..c-Ln ;::;nOd - JDt133 Meeting Date: Location: /09/ ,e; /C--/O~CZ0;/ 0 CCLr'/OUC / / /-/L./'-~ 00.::1.- ~~> D Current Use: D Active Code Enforcement Case ~es: D Address number (_) (no) (vacant land) D Landscaping~) (no) D Overgrown (yes) @) D Debris (yes) @)> D Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (@i D Building(s) @) (fair) (poor) (vacant land) D Fencing (none) ~(dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) D Paint ~ (fair) (poor) (garish) D Grass Parking (yes) ~ D Residential Parking Violations (yes) ~ D Signage (none) ~not ok) (billboard) D Parking (n/a) (~handicapped) (needs repaving) D Dumpster ~.:!not enclosed) D Outdoor storage (yes) WQ1) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date of Review: 1/- s: - 0 ~ Reviewed by: Revised 03-29-01 " Ll;~ - jJA1~S: Pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 3228 1554720 171 O. Page 2 of7 32 / 28 / 15 / 54720 / 171 / 0050 23-Dec-2002 Ji(T\ S(T\ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:03:52 Non-Residentia.l P rope rtlj Add ress. Use. and Sa.les CO(T\parable sales value as Prop Addr: 1091 ELDORADO AUE of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 260.02 sales fro(T\ 2000 - 2001: 0 Sale Date DR BOOk/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac / I(T\p Plat Infor(T\ation 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 1931: Book 020 Pgs 057- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2002 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 2.184.300 HO(T\estead: 0 Ownership " .000 Historic : 0 Use 1: .000 Assessed/Cap: 2.184.300 Tax Exe(T\pt 1: .000 Other Exe(T\p t : 0 Taxable: 2.184.300 Ag r icu 1 tural: 0 2002 Tax Infor(T\ation Land Infor(T\ation District: C..... Seawall: Frontage: C.learwater View: 02 Millage: 23.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: 50.874.75 1) 688 x 168 15.00 115.584.0 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Ho(T\es 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 50.874.75 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exe(T\ptions, Total Land Value: 1. 733. 760 2002 taxes will be : 50.874.75 Short Legal HANDA LAY REPLAT BLK 171. LOTS 6 THRU 11 a Description THAT PART Of LOTS 4 a 5 DESC AS fROH HOST S'LY COR Building Information . Building 1 . Building 2 . Building 3 Building #1 http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=1&a=1&b=l&c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p:... 12/2312002 pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 3228 1554720 171 O. Page 3 of7 32 / 28 / 15 / 54720 / 171 / 0050 :01 Z3-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser lZ:03:5Z Co~~ercial Card Olaf 3 I~prove~ent Type: Rest/Lounge/Drive-in Property Address: 1091 ELDORADO AUE Prop Use: 354 Land Use: 35 Structural Elements Foundation Floor Syste~ Exterior Wall Height Factor Par ty Wall Structural Fra~e Roo f Fra~e Roof Cover Cabinet & Mill Floor Finish Interior Finish Partition Factor Continuous Footing Slab on Grade Siding Average o None None Gable & Hip Celllent Tile Average Carpet COlllbination Drywall o Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 14 Bath Tile Electric Shape Factor Quality Year Built Effective Age Other Depreciation Function Depreciation Econo~ic Depreciation Floor + Ave rage Square Average Half Wall L 935 Z1 o o o Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 9.908 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 3.464 B) .00 0 J) Utility .55 Z.691 9) . 00 0 4) Open Porch . 30 L 05Z 10) .00 0 5) Utility .40 Z88 11) .00 0 6) Detached Utility .45 4Z0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) POOL 100.000.0 1 0 40.000 L 963 2) POOL Z5. 000.00 1 0 10.000 L 963 J) PATIO/DECK Z.50 Z.OOO 0 Z.OOO L 963 4) TENNISCT 1 Z. 000. 00 Z 0 11. 040 L 963 5) ASPHALT 14400 1. 00 14.400 0 14.400 999 6) FIRESPRINK 11166 1. 15 1 L 166 0 8. Z40 L 963 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 91.680 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p:... 12/2312002 pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 3228 1554720171 O. Page 4 of7 32 / 28 / 15 / 54720 / 171 / 0050 :02 Z3-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser lZ:03:53 Co~~ercial Card OZ of 3 I~prove~ent Type: Res Cororo Use Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 354 Land Use: 35 Structural Elements Foundation Floor Syste~ Exterior Wall Height Factor Par ty Wall Structural Fra~e Roof Fra~e Roof Cover Cabinet & Mill Floor Finish Interior Finish Partition Factor continuous Footing Slab on Grade Siding Average o None None Gable 3: Hip Ceroent Tile Ave rage Uinyl or Cork Tile Wood Walls o Heating & Air None Fixtures Bath Tile Electric Shape Factor Quality Year Built Effective Age Other Depreciation Function Depreciation Econo~ic Depreciation 35 None Average Rectangle Average L 956 40 o o o Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 Z.864 7) .00 0 2) Sc reen Po rch . ZO 4Z9 B) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1} DOCK 496 10.00 496 0 L 980 L 956 2} FIREP LAC E HASSIUE 1.500.00 3 0 9.000 L 956 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4} .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 10.980 Building #3 http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b=l&c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p:... 12/23/2002 pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 3228 1554720171 O. Page 5 of7 32 / 28 / 15 / 54720 / 171 / 0050 :03 Z3-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ s~ith. CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser lZ:03:54 Co~~ercial Card 03 of 3 I~prove~ent Type: Res Comm Use Property Address: 0 Prop Use: 354 Land Use: 35 structural Elements Foundation Floor Syste~ Exterior Wall Height Factor Party Wall Structural Fra~e Roo f Fra~e Roof Cover Cabinet & Mill Floor Finish Interior Finish Partition Factor Continuous Footing Slab on Grade Siding Average o None None Gable 3: Hip Cement Tile Ave rage Uin~l or Cork Tile Wood Walls o Heating & Air None Fixtures Bath Tile Electric Shape Factor Quality Year Built Effective Age Other Depreciation Function Depreciation Econo~ic Depreciation 18 None Average Rectangle Average 1. 960 35 o o o Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 Z.759 7) .00 0 2) Sc reen Po rch . ZO 15Z B) .00 0 3) Open Po rch .15 70 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: O' Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[t][!]g]~ http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p:... 12/2312002 P'inellas County Property APp.er Information: 32 28 1554720171 O. Page 60f7 -- 1100 MANDALAY POIN1 ~ 70 0 Q CARLOUEL IN YACHT es CLUB o 1086 DA~Jtt\DO ~ EL DOR ADO ~ AVE ~ ~ 36~ EL ORADO AVE o ELDORAD AVE ELDORAD VE IOJi8 EL D~rlAnJD A v/'f:/ 1054 ELDORADO AVE r-S472c)l -~ \71 1091 EL DAfJt~.DD 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph http://pao.eo.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/egi -ser3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &e= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p:... 12/2312002 . pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 3228 1554720 171 O. Page 7 of7 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p:... 12/23/2002 ~ , . ~ o en a: .... CD ::E :> z .... z ::; '" .... 5 ::; 1:>- a:.... ....u Il- Oa: a:... Il-.... ~ I~ a: ~~ ~d Sg 0'" ~.... ilia x .... z z ~ o .... .... z .... ::E .... .... a: " ~ ~ a: .... Il- o a: Il- o j o >- .... u 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ..0 8~ 11)00 >, W.... 11:0 <( (I)"""'" <(N -.IN ~ <( zw o <.:> 13 ~ z ~. Z 1&.111 O OlD .N N)-. :l:N z'" I~ ei .. ~ ~SI ~ ~ ~ ~H .- 1:' CfJ i~ ~ti. ~;;gu:efi <", ::I"_il" ~ Ei s ~5a .. ~ U:>8 ~ "'~ ,:H o ri;!,Z.!!; i rz..~! "OW..:." o ~ ~ i!! b ~ ia ~~~ u ie -t~ ~ !~"t~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~5G.fsii5 ~ ~ :oD.!:CJI~i5 ::: u ....c.l>15:Sd'i Q'D. o~:iiiool t~ ~e$1ii)l<""o ll..,i'..~;;1i'R ~ i si~~~i~:fi tQ., >-t<6 Oail-... 4..! ij~h~~~~ ~J~ ,..55 .o:.:.e~ ~-; 'I cf.c:1ili}: ~:;~ ~~i5 it Ej~ ... it: 0 .J-~:~!"""~ .fl~ -;o~.... a:-:"~io .~-f i ;.9-~ 25. C ~ - Q [Ii ~~il:!!15 2;' t hn~H~ lil ~~ g'::-I ~;!& '! ~ E :0 i-z "2 d . ~ ~ ." 2 K~' s J!.!l:t~i:!O~"E h ~~i~ii~ii21 ... o o '" \ o o zEB · o o '" b o . o := o -g z --' w CD t:l w ....J '" '" .... '" a: .... o s; ~ ::J >- .... U I I I I I z o >= ~ is in .... o " z Z o N .... z ::; .... z o N '- .... o --' o @~ ~ ..~ 1 ~ _. to N ~ , , " I I I I / ... '. . , . " :. '.. , ,"' , ,1) ~ \ 1 ~ "-'1' . foJP ~ ~ '" rn. o .... g s: 8 JNI1 !SVClO ?~ frn~ . .", .4 E'l'fe6J8W-S-U!6ue ~lIaJ:)W 'Wd Z~:l'S:ZO ~OIE~n:o '6Mp'VLZZ\SV11'v'\ovoOlml\NI~N3\:S < \~ Cl: r..1 .. ~ Ii IS: ~ ~ t:r: ~~~ u!i!8 ~Sl t: ... u ~ ~~.... ;:;; 1:;. ~ ~ ;~t ~o~n ~~A~1 ~~i~l o'"'.J..~ ~ ';J!.C g :g~ ~ !!f~ ~ ~\ / , ~ g > 8 - ... ~ 1~..Y~ ! : ~o,:~i< ot 3 ~ iE~~sil! O:::'ir~~i ~_-"~E__.. o ~~g.~toO. ~E~l ~~~:g O~2"Q'O~~(j j ~ 0 -_ :a..:~! - .. :'t1 D5i.'i~ ~ .. 51.i~.! ll.;t~- ~. ,~~3.0,Jt.~.. C r; CL~13..fi ~~i~ it ~~~.}. -.J-lI..2..~ - ';oi- $:I!!ij.! i....~"!].!i:~~.g . '"l '..ji Hd"H~p ~::-I!~~lro 1 :si'i...~~~j=l i ~~!~ES~:'~E a l:iel~~&fll ~ ~ :; i~ ji" J11 H t". ;ji ~ili !il1;i ~~l i:1 h ~l f,.! .. ,!. <> ~ ~ :;; ::; >- ....>- "'.... ~lJ 0", "'... ....... ... I~ '" ...... ~d 0..... .....0 oVi ....... OiB lia Li3 ~ . 8 ~ ~ ~ II: i! 8 ~ '" .... ... o '" 0- o ~ o ~ e x ..... z z ... o .... .... z ..... :z ..... ..... '" " ... b ~ o z o ;: ... is Vi ..... o " z Z o N zEB 0 <> '"' ..... z ::; 5 lD :z :::;) z o - ~ Z 0 UJ 16 D W -l '- III III .... '" o ~ III .... 'i :J >- .... e ~ U III ..... z ::; ..... z o N s ~ 5 I; I ~ .... o -' o ~ ~ ~ ~ @~ <> A W<iJ-rrvnx ~~ ~ VI 1- ~~ 1&.1 ~~@ VI =~ <. o z < ::IE ~ 'O)r;)?'X/o 7r ~ /r~ ... .. m om 1&.1........ VI_ 5"" w........ IX;? <( cnCO <(1"1 ..IN .- <( zw o " ~~ Z ~I Z LL (fI O OCD ".N N~I ~N (fIO') ~ m Q) '<t N L :/ ~ S !; o u \;Od.911JalJ-S-U!6ua ~1"'J:lV'l 'lIld 6~:Ln:O UlIEUC:O '6Mp'~Vll,^a\f:JOln\f\NmN3\:S '" .1 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, January 21, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in Commission Chambers, third floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine:. Those cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neie:hborine: propertv owners. etc. will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved bv a sine:le vote at the bee:innine: of the meetine:. 1. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Decade 80-XIV (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) - flexible development approval to increase the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 149 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions ofSec 2-903.C, and to reduce the buffer width along the north property line from 10 feet to 5 feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: 146 attached condominium dwellings, 8 attached townhome dwellings, 120-slip marina [73 public slips and 43 slips reserved for condos] and 7,500 square-foot nonresidential uses [restaurant/ship's store/marina office]) at 900 North Osceola Ave., J.A. Gorra Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3; Sue Barco Sub, Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23; and F. T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10. FLD2002-10036. (TO BE CONTINUED TO DATE UNCERTAIN) 2. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Peter J. Hunt. TRE - flexible development approval to terminate the status of a nonconforming structure to permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot setback is required, under the provisions ofSec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot rear setback to building) at 849 Harbor Island, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 6D, 7 A, 7C, Lot 44. FLD 2002- 10034 3. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Morton Plant Hospital Association. Inc. - flexible development application to revise a master site plan previously approved by the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Community Development Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development standards as part of the original Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community Development Board): · Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)*; · Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary shop)*; · Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell Cancer Pavilion)*; · Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);* · Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building);* · Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*; · Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*; · Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*; · Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet*. (Proposed Use: Changes to an approved Master Plan including improved stormwater facilities, the addition of property enlarging the campus, the replacement and/or enlargement of seven buildings and the addition of three parking garages) at 300 Pinellas St., See 21-29-15, M&B's 12.01, 12.02, 12.03, 12.12, 12.15,21.01,21.02 & 21.03; Magnolia Park, Blk 35 Lots 1-9 & Lots 14-22 and E 10 ft ofa 60 ft abandoned RR right-of-way; Magnolia Park, Blk 38, Lots 1-8 inclusive and 1/2 vac street N, Lots 15, 16, 17, 18-22 inclusive; Bluff View, Lots 16-26 & E 31 ft of Lot 27 and less 10ft vac alley adj on Riess E; Milton Park, Blk 5, Lots 1-6 & N 1/2 vac alley adj on S; Milton Park, Blk 7, Lots 1-7 and vac alley between Lots 2-7 and N 1/2 vac alley adj S of Lot 1; S.J. Reynold's Sub., Lots 1-5 & N 20 ft of Lot 6, Lot 7-9; J.B. Roberts Sub, Lots 1-2 & 1/2 vac alley on E less road. in NW corner SD Lot 1, Lots 3-5 & 7 -11 inclusive and vac alley between & pt unnm lot of Porns Park lying S; Porns Park, E 93.68 ft of unnumbered tract S of Pin ell as Ave & N 1/2 ofvac St. on S; Petzold Gulf View, Lot 3 & part of Lot 2 & 4; Turners AC Add to Milton Park Blks A&B & 1/2 vac st on N; Heart and Vascular Pavilion, Commercial Condo - Common Elements; Westover, Blk A, Lots 1-22 & vac rds on E & S; Westover, Blk B, Lots 1,2,3 and Lot 7 and W 14 ft of Lot 6 and Lots 8-17 & vac Pinellas St. adj on N and Lot 4 of Barnes, W.N. Sub, Bluff View Court E 18 ft of Lots 1, 7, 9, 11, 13,15, 17, 19 & 20 W for road, All of Bluff View Court sub including right of ways less 18 ft for Reynolds Avenue right of way and unplatted land adjacent on W, and Westover Blk B, Lots 4-5 and E 39.3 ft of Lot 6. FLD 2002- 10035 4. Beach Motel Manae:ement (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) of a 6-s1ip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-601; and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling development with a 6-sli, multi- , . . . use dock) at 620 Bavwav Blvd. (The Moorings I), Bayside Sub No.5, Elk A, Lots 9 & 10 and riparian rights. FLD 2002-11 039/PL T 2002-11003 5. Cote}. Inc. (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 to 2 feet (to pool deck) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling development with an existing 6-slip, multi-use dock) at 674 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Elk A, Lots 19 & 20. FLD 2002-11038/PLT 2002-11002 6. Bril:!:htwater Investment Establishment (Angelika Marocordes) - flexible development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 0 feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 10 lots. (Proposed Use: A 10-unit attached dwelling development) at 161 Bril:!:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2, Lots 14-16 inclusive. FLD 2002-11042/PLT 2002-11005 7. Gus DiGiovanni (Bayway Townhomes, LLC) - flexible development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to walkway), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) for a 1O-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3- 601; and preliminary plat approval for 11 lots. (Proposed Use: An II-unit attached dwelling project with 10 docks) at 656 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 15-18. FLD 2002-11041/PLT 2002-11004 8. Burnabv Welch Corporation - flexible development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to 9 feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 15-unit attached dwelling development with an existing II-slip dock) at 692 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 21-23. FLD 2002-11043 9. Carlouel Yacht Club - flexible development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to 6 feet, under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed use: A 10-foot wide by 250-foot long floating dock [adjacent to seawall]) at 1091 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay Replat, Blk 171, Lots 6-11 and part of Lots 4 & 5. FLD 2002-10033 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the PlaIll1ing Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, PlaIll1ing Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567. Lisa Fierce PlaIll1ing Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. Ad: 01/05/03 f ;r-'ft-V o/(/U;L. -/U(3):'~:J'). J::.:-I) /-6) C!.J.21!J 1/;1..1(03 . ." .. ",,-~ e-rL :';)1;;"0/03 ~ 8J {1AE.Ate... UJI9TEte- ~ACI-I A 55/\/. % ~ 7 IfA/I/ b 111-,(:J Y .A~ jC (!..JJ~ /.J~t./ H77E.,e.-. h 331" 7 :/ BURCHENAL, MARTHA L C/O SCHUTTE, SARA L 28::;;2 H()F;~\iC'y' RD I"'j (::1 S () I",! 0 H .4 .5 () .t.i. () ~;, I~~' (1.S TC)j"'i()C I C" JOSEPI-j :'<l.J~:3ECCf<." .JOSEF'JH 6929 N KCNNETH AVE L. J J".I C: C) L t".1 liJ () () D J L (:~ () 7"1 ::? t.:l )" () ~3 L.EA" r"jl~\F~'y' L. TRE 5 ()i"/iE:LE:~:) I DE [)R C: LEA F,: I,,") ('I T E:: F,: F'L. ;5 ~.3 .'/ ,~S I:;;. .1 '9 () ~;l POOLE. WILLIAM C III PO()L.E:, f30Nt....! I [ f< 1055 BAY ESPLANADE C:L.f::PIF':I,'I,IPITCF: FL :::::; ::5 "7 (;I ~l HAMPSCY. JAMES P HAMPSEY, KRISTINE M 1031 E:AY ESPLANADE CLr:(>IR~',.I()TCF~ FL l .1 () 0(;. DIMMITT, LAWRENCE HIlI DIMMITT, GENEVICVE L 1015 BAY ESPLANADE CL[(~RI....)t'IT[f~ FL :::) ::5 ~l (~:, .'/ .1 () () (, RE[D, [LIZABETH T 1104 MANDALAY PT C L.. E t\ F,: 1.,1) 1~>lr E F,: F'L :~:~; :5 "7 {) "7 i....i (>1 (.! [) (l L_ PI 'y' P () I (..! T 1550 S HIGHLAND AV[ STE E: C: L. E (\ F< 1"',.1 (\r E R F L ::; ::$ 'l' .~::. l:~ ~? ~5 .::1 ::5 PHE\/I'~'IS :,fHOivi(.~S p LOI0 BAY ESPLANADE C:LEARI,I"I()TER FL :?.:; ::~S "7 I~:;' .'/ j.....i IT C 1"-1 (\ j""i" .J () H j"'.1 .J MITCHAM. GLENDA A :SI).1.4 H(\F::CIETT Lt.,! :;;;:(lFET'y" H()PI30F~ Fl.." ::~::; 4 (;. f9 .:~;I E~ ~2: .4 '9 [) [h~ 1/,) t:~ i.....!f" S U:3 () N T 1033 ELDOPADO AVE CLEAHWATER BCH FL ;5.5l(,7 1024 ,.JOi".ILS" HErfl 13 C/O FIFTH THIRD BANK ATTN: TRUST DEPT MDICOM45-32 38 FOUNTAIN SQ PLZ C:: I r..J, C:: I (.1 i'..1 (>IT I Ol-j tf.5- () tJ 'L e /2.ol3E-.R-r '714 OP-lP..j Ct N' I '^ ,3? H'IIe.. n-.. E.... A y t=:- . C!.JJEA e.<<.JAn=:...e../ h 33750 CPiRL_OUCL. co c/o MC MULLEN. J TWEED [::' 0 13C))< 1.669 C:LE(~h~~I,I(>I'r[p FL ::::; :5 ~l .:;1 ~l .1. () I~:~ s' ATHANASIOU, GEORGE PiTf'/()f\!(;:lS I OI.J" f:;:OSE 1018 BAY ESPLANADE DR C 1_ [ (;>1 F: t",,1 (\ T F~ F~ F L. 5:57(,/ J.()09 ARNOLD, LEE E JR ARNOLD, DEBORAH B 1049 BAY ESPLANADE C:L.E{)h:l,h,l(>ITEP F'L_ :5 ::::; "7 (:. 7' 1. () ::? .:) H C) 1/\1 (~t....!" C () f~!. 1:: \( T R 0 1,1',1 (~j"..!" P (~j""'i E L. (~ B 1035 BAY ESPLANADE CLEnh~I,.',,1(iTE:h~ FL. ::5::~;'? 6 7' PETEHSON. CHAHLES G Pf::TEHSON, SANDRA K 1021 BAY ESPLANADE AVE CL.[()RI/')f~TEF<~ FL ~) ?:; 7" c~, "/ .1 () () t~~ DUSHAS. EVANGELIA 1100 MANDALAY POINT PD CL_E:()HI~)('ITEF,: FL :,'5 :?5 '7 (. '/ 1. () <:~~. ~2 SHOWN. HERBERT G B r.< () 1,.",1 j.....! ,; DIP, t.,.! E F' 111 ,:j t"1 I~) i....1 D (~L ('>1 Y p'r Cl_E(\R/,J.,IPiTEF< F:7L 3 ~~; ",i' (. 7' 1. () .:~:j. 2: o CAHLOUEL YACHT CORP 1091 ELDORADO AVE C~LEARIi'II()rEh~ FL. :3:S.l..~~,7 1007 SH(.~J"'J" l{[ h: IT S SHAH, J"II.)f<.r I }<. 1015 ELDORADO AVE C: L_ [' (\ F,: 1,t',1 PIT [: h: F L_ 3:::S)'(,l 10:2,1 HALBAUEH, STEWARJ R THE 1025 ELDORADO AVE CL_EI;~Hv.)PITER r":7L :3; :~~; "? I~:~ '~l 1 () ~2 (1 13ENEC:CH I" FiOV' J E:Et....!EC:CHI" G()IE (~ 74:) I V'V' ()VE Ci L. E j.....! D {'I L_ r::: CI H t.~l.S:2 ..4 () t.:t .(1.1. () LATIMER, JACQUELINE S PC) f30::>( :5(<::,96 CL.Ct\F!.I,""I{~! T[F~ FL ~5 :5 .../ (;1 7" :~:~; {) ~;:' I~:~ '4 r . . ALLEMANN. BEVERLY B ALLEMANN. FRANK V 1044 MANDALAY AVE (:L,E{'ih~V')('IT[F~ FL . CALLAHAN, VIRGINIA U 1040 MANDA LAY AV[ C;LEt'lh~V')(:'1 T'r:R FL ::~) ~5 ),. (;;, 7' .1 () .4 () :5 ;5 -7 (::. )' ALD[RMAN, HOMER M JR ALD[RMAN. FRANCES H 1034 MANDA LAY AVE C:L.Et'iR\,\I(.'iTFR F'Lo :5 ::<;; 7 (,71 0 0<:1 () BURNLEY, STEVEN M BURNLEY, MADELIN[ 1030 MANDALAY AVE CLF(.)R\"')('iT[~R FL 33/67 1()4() VAZQUEZ. RAMON A III \/('IZOt.)[Z. Et"'j~"'i() L 1024 MANDALAY AV[ CL[(~RI,I"I{:~TEr~ FL r'1ITC1'1(~rYj" JOI1i"'~ J MITCHAM. GLENDA A 3 () .14 f'l (l F1 G err L" t....! SAFETY HARBOR FL :~3 ;5 7 I~:::l ";l .1. () .4 () :5 ,{j. (:~ 19 .~s E, 2 -:::1. ~~~ C: L E: (1 h: I,,") ('i T E F<. , PC) BCI>< 47[,:' C:: L.. E: t) R I,,") ()'-~: F;~ ""{ OF BARROW. LOUISE R 5 li. 2: n L, 'y' h. E: S L, I....! 'f' () j.....j F' n Fe L,,, :5 :3 ~~) .1.1 ~~, -llf. ')' i"'i IT C:: i'l (': jVj" ,J 0 Hr.,! ,J t....iIT c: f'l (~l'-'j" G () j"',! H ?:;().It.:i H(>IF~GETT LN ~3t~IFETY H(~h~HOF~ ['L LEONnRD, RUTH T TRE LEOHnRD. JnMES B TRE ~2~:, 1 P I i'..j C F~ [) C: L, C () F<~ 1,,",1 1-':) T E R F L, :5::::;7~::,6 10.16 ::5 ~q. (:, (;) .~s .~:':I ~? 1.1 (.::;:1 ANDREWS, DAYTON T 4t.:i0 COUNTRY CLUB RD C: L. r:: A R \""II:~~ T E f~ [' L, C~ () L~ [) j.....j l~.~~ i\! ~~ [) (~~ \,l I [) ~;; GOLDMAN, LENORE D 851 INDIAN ROCKS RD C:LEt:IRll')(irEF~ FL, :5:?5-/ !56, 1()CI5, ~3; ?:; -7 !:; f.. .1 () ;~:~ .~l MITHOEFER. MICHAEL C MITHOEFER. C KEITH C/O BINKLEY, PHYLLIS /)() H()X :295 " I,''')' I'''''' C:,J '.:~:"I:::e "I'" '",,' "f' ,.."".- -1.'.1 I 0;) 43 .. "'.' I '. ...} ~~~ , L' ~:) ~ r C:::I::lRL,()UEL. Ci()RDF.::r',j I 1'1P (::I~;;S~'! 1 NC PO I3CJ::< :'5,<142 C L. E (.) I? l""II~) T [: F1 Fe L .....,. r' ,"~, 1'-" '-j ...~~ .""'. ."". "~.' 3~5~f f.S 7' f~(1(4:? ..J 0 i',.j E S" B er 1,,1 13 C::,./() THE ::lFTH (>ITTi...j :.:T~'~ JST DF R D B I':) i",,! f<. 1....iDJ..C()h4 E..-- :S2 LZ 5&09- ."i e' ,....~ ........ '..~I BURCHEHAL" AHH K TRe 1058 ELDORnDO AVE C: L, E (~ FI ',I"II~~'1 T E R FL... DEXTER PROPERTIeS 6,.1~2: DPIJ I D F<~D E C:LE(~h~\",,1(lTER FL. 3 ::5 7' .:::1 6. ::s '9 .1 :~? ::5 :5 '}' (;~ '7 1, () ~? ~) ,J :3 T CL.E(CjI:'II,,")(~ TEh~ c/O JANE SMITH TURHER 2660 PCACHTREE RD NW ~ lOF (l T L, (ll...jT (~ (; (~ MARIANI, BARBARA C 1076 ELDORADO AVE CL,[: ()r~~v.,1tl TEf~~ I::-L 7~; () :::~~ () E::r ::S (~ ";l ;:. :~; ~~; ~l () .? 1. Cl ~2::5 MARIANI. TIMOTHY K TRE c/o MARIAHI ASPHALT CO 1550 S HIGHLAND AVE C:: L F: (~ F~ 1,1,1 (~I T E F.~ F~ L WOODRUFF. CHRISTIAN H WOODRUFF" CHRISTIHE 107n ELDORADO nVE CLE:(iRI,I"I(>ITEF~ F:-L, :::~; :::) ~? .~::l t~::) 3 ::'$ ~~/ (:) 7' 1. () :2 :::s SPEi".!CE:R" 5tlLL,,'~'" PI 4 [3(l\'HF~00K PL C: L., E I~~l h~ V,,, (:1 T E: F\~ F L :5 ::~; ../ .S I,~:" 1. <:,..1- () :2 COI~~'iL.,E:. J()Ht'--j P VAH SUSTEREN, GRETA C 1090 ELDORA DO AVE C: L.. [:: I~) h~ 1/1' ('IT E r.:: F L. ::::; :~:S ~? (:1 '7 J.. () :2 ::s