FL01-01-04
j
..
. CITYOFCLEAwA1ER
API'LICA1ION FOI{ SITE PLAN APPROVAL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMlNISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 soum MYRTLE A VENUE, 2"" FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
This form must be submilled ror all applications for residential uses. accessory uses, nonresidential uses, ranees,
Signs, vesled rights. development agreements, seawalls, docks, marinas and other marine structures and home occupations.
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT NAME:
UNITED BANK AND TRTJST mM1>ANV
MAILING ADDRESS
: 333 Third Avp N, 5t PQtQr@l:narg, n JJ701
:(727) 898-2265 FAXNUMBER: (727) R?1-?"ih1
PHONE NUMBER
PROPERTY OWWERS
L. M. Loken
(list an owners)
AGENT NAME
EDUJ b.~D \1.
\LlI\.L~'EQ . .\2.
,
MAILING ADDRESS
70 \ "E N. n;.Q. Pt2.l 'SE.. 'tZ. C. E. c:;<.xni 0oe.
PHONE NUMBER
72. 7 - 7'2..~ 47{'(;
FAX NUMBER: 727 - 1Ze, 47C,7
~OPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
~REETADDRESS: Corner of Belcher Road and N.E. Sharkey Road. r,lpR~~rpr, Flnrirl~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Boundary Survey of a porrinn nf rnp ~r;~;ty Bapt~~t Ch~reh ~r9perty in th
NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 29 S, Range 16 E.
PARCEL NUMBER:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
tWO STn12.'( eJ"F'l='lr.E. 'l?;,( l\\.OH...l.(., \U,.,.U 'I2.~\~\L c,L\l~ c;. ~\40 S~QtJ'C~
(number of dwelling unils, holel rooms or square foolage of nonresldenlial use)
SIZE OF SITE:
\/3 SA AC Y2.E So
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: L t;:.V~ L '2 ~ Q~O()C€O c:,~1''e>~CJlS. I B 7~ tZ'E:rMl "7~\.E.<g boNb S~2.VlCE'5
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES _ NO ~
I. the undersigned. acknowledge that all
representations made in this application
are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELJ"p..k..
Sworl.to and subscribed before me this 7'~ day of
~/A~ ,A.D., ..s:g.;zoO! !o me and/or
D;V_ C/ , who IS personally
known has produced as
identification.
c::;::. .SARAH D. BYARS
EXPIRES: JIiy 30, 2004
IlcIl1lIod l1vu NalIrt PliIIID \lndIIWltIIlS
PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY:
l~."O use DISTRICT OF PARCEL: . ZONING:
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS. NORTH:
SOUTH:
FUTURE DESIGNATION:
EAST:
WEST:
FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF AUJACErH F'ilRCELS: NORTH:
SOUTH:
EAST:
WEST:
S: application forms/developmenl review/basic applicalil)ndoc
.
.
.
.
.
II
U"'''ED BANK.
January 8, 2001
Planning and Development Services Administration
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Florida
Re: Affidavit to Authorize Agent
To Whom It May Concern:
Please be advised that, although United Bank and Trust Company is not the
present owner of the property located on the southeast comer of Northeast
Coachman Road and Belcher Road, the Bank has entered into an agreement
with the owner to pay any and all costs associated with an application for
variance to construct a bank facility on this site. As a result, we have authorized
Edward H Walker, Jr. to act as our agent in presentation of this matter to the City
of Clearwater and have joined with the owner in executing the Affidavit to
Authorize Agent attached hereto.
ave any questions, please contact me at 824-8722.
'..
Cy hia A. Stokes
ecutive Vice President
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 8th day of January, 2001
by Cynthia A. Stokes, Executive Vice President of United Bank and Trust.
She i~~allY known to me and did not take an oath.
UJ. ~ ~ r.-SABNJ
NOTARY PUBLIC . t.>>~ MYCOMMISSIONtCC801281
~~ . EXPIRES: MaR:h 14.2003
q : BandId 'IllI\I HaIIIy PliIIc \hlIrwriIIlS
p.o. Box 14517 St. Petersburg, FL 33733-4517 (727) 898-2265 MEMBER FDIC
www.unitedbank.com
A United Financial company
A AFFIDA VIT TO AUTIU;lRIZE AGENT
. IWlNNING & DEVELOPMENT S~ES ADMlNISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOU1ll MYRTI.E AVENUE, 2M FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
L.M. Lo~
~ UN \~ 13PrN"- ~~ST' Coty1?~1
(Name off all property owners) -+ St:e ~~ k-.,..,.",,--e. Of: B1-i:>L..A-H A-""o~~~ If'l<,, ~b
Role O~ Ul'-4 .,~ 'n-l ~~ ~4H.JC:S1 FOe. \1M-I ANuc..
1. That (I arn/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION: ~OQ.lUe~c;..,. ~~.6.C\.1 v..~~ Qr)A.'=' ~ ~\.CU.E~ 2C:>A.'C>
- .~o~~~~~ ~~n~~~
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
\.. Ev@:.\... rz ~Valc;l~/,^~'-L '1 - 'Q.'e..'Dl )("li.\? ~'QOI-l"" c:::.'E."t0~C1lS ~ ~ ""nEiJ'
-s."H2mz:.-r-=;. - \A '70 . 2.-=.Th.\\. S~\.u~ b.~O c::;.e.Y2VlCE5 (P-;,AN~')
h'e.v ~ \t!> 91'^ ~ l-l:r U.o:,~
(Nature of request)
(IJl"t\+ ~~t::lCl:1
.
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
1;;: t:>\1.I~t2t> U. \ U j. L 1l~tZ..J j2.
as (hisltheir) agent(sl to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition:
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5.
ned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this C}#- day of
;I/".Vn ~ ' A.D., ~ ~~I to me and/or
by , who is personally
SIGNED (Property Owner)
Notary publiC.
My commission expires:
~
.
.
.
Prepared by and return to:
Jack R. St. Arnold, Esquire
St. Arnold & Steams, Chartered
1370 Pinehurst Road
Dunedin, FL 34698
TRUSTEE'S WARRANTY DEEQ
THIS INDENTURE, executed this Z4.JA day of July, 2000, between HOWARD LEE
McCAULEY and SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Trustees of THE McCAULEY CHARITABLE
TRUST under the Declaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995, with full power and authority
to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber or otherwise manage and dispose of said property
pursuant to Florida Statute 689.071, GRANTOR, and LUVERNE M. LOKEN as Trustee of THE
LUVERNE M. LOKEN AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT
dated May 12, 1994, as GRANTEE, whose address is: Z );0SIt1t 1.4#. tMO? w..IPd1r-. second
party: 33150.
Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include singular and plural,
heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of
corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires.
. WITNESSETH, that the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00)
Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by the said
Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and
quitclaim unto the said Grantee forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the
said Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and
being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit:
See Exhibit "A"
Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record,
and taxes for the year 2000 and subsequent years.
Parcel No. 07/29/16/00000/30210310
. '
and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of afl persons whomsoever.
The Grantor further warrants that the above described property does not now and
never has constituted Grantor's homestead, and is not now and never has been
contiguous to Grantor's homestead.
.
1
.
.
.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances
thereunto belonging to or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien,
equity and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use,
benefit and behoof of the said Grantee forever.
. THIS DEED is executed pursuant to and in the exercise of the power and authority
granted to and vested in said Trustee by the terms of said deed or deeds in trust delivered to
said Trustee in pursuance of the Trust Agreement above mentioned. This deed is made
subject to the lien of every trust deed or mortgage (if there be any) of record in said county
given to secure the payment of money, remaining unreleased at the date of the delivery hereof,
and covenants, conditions, restrictions, and easements of record.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents
the day and year first above written.
.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the presence of:
S. .~r~~~
I gr-r.::c:::: I
Print: J ~~.f? t/ 13.4'
.~ .
19n: ft. ~
~nt: /,-, )..,J,h....
,
. srg~?~
Printl.1'f-/-?/L. ,/ ~2(.,.t3'4
/~4);~
THE McCAULEY CHARITABLE TRUST
4 (r1
SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Di / tor under
~eclaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~4.J), day of July,
2000, by HOWARD LEE McCAULEY and SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Directors under th~
Declaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995, who is personally known to me or who have
produced :f.L.J)r,I/Prs It. ~<;,f ~ as identification and who did take an oath, and
acknowledged to and before me that they have executed the foregoing instrument for the
purposes therein expressed. .. /1
NARY PUBLIC:
....M.." """'ICA K8.SEY
~~~~ ........ l
~~:~ MY COMMI~'ON' CC898200
~ . ~ EXPIRES. March 26, 2llO4
~ii.:' . Bondeclllvu NCIIIIy Public lInclIrwriI8n
.
2
j
"
.
.
..
.
.
EXHIBIT "A"
Comincnce at the Southetst corDer of the NOrthwest ~ of rbe Scudswesr "of .
Section 7. Township 29 South. lWIge 16 East.1Dd nin Nortb.0c.12'32- &sf,
33.07 f=t toa point OD die Northerly right-of-way of County Road 2a9 (Shark:)'
Road) ruD thence North 89038'..9- West 1JOnJ said Northerly ri&hl~f.W2'y JiDe
99'.26 fett for a PobK ofBeJiaDina: run t&en="North 19038'49- Wet =aWw-
ia, aIollJ aid Nonbe:ly rlpr-of-wa1!me 262.16 feet rc I PO_ 011 &he Easretly
rilht-ot-way fiDe of Betcher Rmd; run thenc: Nonh 00-01.19- East aJcaa the
easterly riPt~f-way 1iDe 159.19 fe:t to I point oG &be Souther!y ript-ol-ny.of
Nonh=st ~~n Read (Qnmty RD3d No.2); Ibe%a lWl North .53.$] '23-
East aloDl uJd Souther!y rilht-of-way line 230.00 feet; run ~ Soath .
27000'16- East 168.49 f=t. run South 00005' 16- West 146.23 feet rc Ibe Point
of Beginning.
.
.
.
II
UNII'ED BANK
January 8,2001
Planning and Development Services Administration
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
,Clearwater, Florida
Re: Statement of Contracturallnterest in Property at SE Corner of
Northeast Coachman and Belcher Road
To Whom It May Concern:
.
Please be advised that United Bank and Trust Company has entered into a
purchase agreement with L.M. Loken, the owner of the property located at the
southeast comer of Northeast Coachman Road and Belcher Road, subject to
and contingent upon the Buyer, United Bank, securing a variance to permit the
construction and existence of a branch banking facility on the site.
The Bank has agreed to assume all expenses associated with obtaining a
variance to permit construction of a banking facility of approximately 2,500
square feet with an additional 1,1 00 square feet of covered drive through on the
site. The closing of the contract is to take place prior to April 30, 2001.
The Bank is aware of no other parties with, of course, the exception of the
current owner, L.M. Loken, that have a contractural interest in the property.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 824-8722.
i,.~
.
cas
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 8th day of January, 2001
by Cynthia A. Stokes, Executive Vice President of United Bank and Trust.
She is personally known to me and did not take an 0 to},
~ ~ CAWJLSMNJ
. NOTARY PUBLI f*: :~ MYCOMMlSSIONtCC801281
. . "" t. .te~ u"', Fl 33733.4517 (727) 898.22/ ~~_"':.:~
www.unitedbank.com
A United Financial company
.
.
.
.
.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY lOCATED AT NORTHEAST
COACHMAN AND BELCHER PROPERTY
Proposed Office BuildinQ
level Two General Standards
1. The proposed two story office building development is within the scale of
development of the surrounding area. This project should enhance the ~aracter and
aesthetic quality of the adjacent development Most of the surrounding area along
Belcher and Coachman is retail. The zoning is currently "0" office.
2. The proposed development should not effect current development and usage of
retail strip centers. The proposed and permitted office will not intrude into the existing
residential areas. This development may in fact encourage appropriate redevelopment
of these properties. This project should increase surrounding property values with the
increased value of proposed property development.
3. The use of the land currently zoned office and used as office with an increase of
retail space (bank) beyond the allowed amount should in no way affect the safety of
persons residing or working in the surrounding area.
4. Access to the property will be limited to one entrance and exit on N. E. Coachman at
east end of the property and one entrance and exit on Starkey Road on into Belcher.
5. The community character of the immediate area (such as is) should only be
improved by this proposed development. The development will include landscape
treatment beyond that required.
6. The hours of normal operation, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. of the bank and offices should
not impact noise, visually on adjacent properties. The proposed increase of retail
space (bank) beyond the 10% allowed under office zoning will not increase any of the
above conditions.
.,
.
.
.
.
.
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
Northeast Coachman and Belcher Property
Proposed Office Building
Requested Deviations From the Development Standards:
Parking Surface Setbacks Requests -
N. E. Coachman - 25 ft to 15 ft.
Belcher Road - 25 ft. to 15 ft.
Starkey Road - 25 ft. to 5 ft.
East Sideyard - 20 ft. to 10ft.
~
Increase Retail- Bank - 10% to 18%
1. In order to develop reasonable use of property as office and limited retail ,
deviations from development standards are requested. Because the property is
surrounded on three sides by road right-of-ways, the setback of 25 feet from parking
creates an impractical hardship of reasonable use. We are requesting a reduction to
fifteen feet. United Bank of St. Petersburg believes the location merits a branch bank.
The minimum area for their banking needs is 2,500 square feet which exceeds the
permitted allowable area for retail and services of 10% of the office area by 8%.
2. This development should increase surrounding property values and hopefully cause
other redevelopments. The property value should this project be completed is
estimated at $450,000.00.
3. The current zoning of "0' office permits the redevelopment 14,300 square feet of
office space in a two story structure. Retail and services space of 10% or 14,300
square feet is permitted. The request is for 2,500 square feet or 18% of retail and
services. Office and limited retail is permitted under office use.
4. The mix use of office and limited retail and services are compatible with the current
retail development and mix use of the surrounding property..
5. There are, of course, other sites suitable for office and banking development within
the City of Clearwater. Office use is permitted within the current office zoning on this
property. United Bank of St. Petersburg believes a bank is needed at this location and
attends to provide such service to the area. Other sites may not have banking needs..
6. The proposed office development will without doubt upgrade the immediate area
along Belcher and N. E. Coachman. Neither the bank or the office use will negatively
affect the adjacent school or the surrounding residential area.
.
.
.
.
.
7. The proposed design is straight forward functional solution which should enhance
any character the surrounding properties may have developed. The project will be
compatible with other areas of Clearwater and become an asset to the goals of
redevelopment
8. The property is surrounded on three sides by streets, Belcher, N. E. Coachman and
Starkey Road. In order to provide adequate off-street parking we are requesting a
reduction of the required 25 foot setback to parking which is defined as a structure to
15 feet and along Belcher Road and Coachman Road, five foot setbac~ along Starkey
Road and ten foot setback along the east property for paving surface. The building
setbacks or structure setbacks exceeds those requiredd in the development code.
9. Adequ.ate off-street parking at a ratio of 4.5 per 1,000 square feet of office area will
be provided. Stacking space for the bank drive-in teller meets or exceeds the city's
requirements.
Prepared by Walker and Associates Architects, P~A
.
.
.
APPLI.CA TION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PROPOSED OFFICE AND BANK
NORTHEAST COACHMAN AND BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER ,FL
FOR
UNITED BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG
INDEX.
.
AFFIDA VIT OF AUTHORIZATION
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP - WARRANTY DEED
NAME OF ALL PERSONS WITH CONTRACTURAl INTEREST
FLEXIBLE CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO DEVELOPMENT
JANUARY 22, 2001
:.
\\ffi ~~
~~ WALKER AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.A.
701 EN~ RD. E. sum: J02 SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIOA
PH (727) n64186 FAX (n7) n64767
.
.
.
"
.
.
APPLICA TION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PROPOSED OFFICE AND BANK
NORTHEAST COACHMAN AND BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER ,FL
FOR
UNITED BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG
INDEX.
AFFIDA VIT OF AUTHORIZATION
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP - WARRANTY DEED
NAME OF ALL PERSONS WITH CONTRACTURAL INTEREST
FLEXIBLE CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO DEVELOPMENT
JAN 2 402:; WI
PLANNING & DEVELOP;~tNT svcsl
elT\' OF CLEARWo:' cR l
...._,........""'."...r
JANUARY 22, 2001
EIL.I
J;~ O( -ft-<?;[.
~ WALKER AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.A.
701 ENIERPRISE RD. E. SUITE 302 SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA
PH (727) 7264766 FAX (727) 7264767
I
..
. Crry OF CLE.{WArrEI{
AIJI)LICA1ION FOI{ SITE PLAN APPH.OVAL
PLANNING & DEVI~LOPMENT SERVICES ADMlNISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SER VICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, 2"" FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
This form must be submitted ror all applications for resIdential uses, accessory uses, nonresidential uses, ranees,
Signs, vested rights, development agreements. seawalls, docks, marinas and other marine structures and home occupations.
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT NAME:
UNITED BANK AND TRUST r.OMPANY
MAILING ADDRESS
: 331 Third Avp ~. St P~t8rGbYrg, FL JJ701
PHONE NUM8ER
: (727) 898-2265
FAXNUM8ER: (77.7) R?1-?'ifi1
PROPERTY OWNERS
L. M. Loken
(lIsl all owners)
AGENT NAME
E.DUJb.~D \L
\ LIT\. L ~ 'E Q . .\ 2 .
~
MAILING ADDRESS
70\ "ENit;;.Q.Pt2..lSE.. 'tZ.c. E, 70rT'E: 0oe.
PHONE NUMBER
72. 7 - 7'2..~ 47{'(;
FAX NUMBER: "727- 1Ze, 47C, 7
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
411kEETADDRESS' Corner of Belcher Road and N.E. Sharkey Road, GleR~R'pr, Florida
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Boundary Survey of a pnrrinn nf rnp Triuity ~gptigt Church propGrty in th
NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 29 S, Range 16 E.
PARCEL NUMBER:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: ,(VO STnt2.'( c:)''Fl=lr..E. -e,(l\\.OH...tc" \U,,.U 12.q:rA\'-<=:'~\,\;JS ~\40 SEt2tJIC~
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
SIZE OF SITE:
\.":3 SR A.CQ..E S
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: L t;.Vt; L '2 ~ Q~O(Jc.E'P ~~1''3~CIlS ~ 'B ';1" tZErML '5~'E'3 ~Nb S~2.VICE"5
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRJ\NSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES _ NO --X--
I. the undersigned, acknowledge that all
representations made in this application
are true and accurate to the best of Illy
knowledge.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL(\k
sw~ to and subscribed before me this >- - day of
~ /11.IAfX.CJ ,A.D., 1:90200 I to me and/or
I:{ , who is personally
known has produced as
identification.
C::::. 'L ('.1--.
o ary public,
my commission expires:
,/~..
. PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY:
USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL:
ZONING CLASSIFICA nON OF ADJACENT PAr,CELS'
ZO~J1NG: 0
110RTH If11D~ SOUTH:
FUTURE DESIGNATION:
I EAST: I
elo6
WEST: L
FUTUHE LAND USE CLASSIFICA TION OF ALJJACEt I r r!lf~CELS: NORTH:
SOUTH:
EAST:
WEST:
S: application forrns/development review/basic applicilliof1 doc
'Z'B'IA
.
.
.
.
.
II
UNITED BANK
January 8, 2001
Planning and Development Services Administration
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Florida
Re: Affidavit to Authorize Agent
To Whom It May Concern:
Please be advised that, although United Bank and Trust Company is not the
present owner of the property located on the southeast corner of Northeast
Coachman Road and Belcher Road, the Bank has entered into an agreement
with the owner to pay any and all costs associated with an application for
variance to construct a bank facility on this site, As a result, we have authorized
Edward H Walker, Jr. to act as our agent in presentation of this matter to the City
of Clearwater and have joined with the owner in executing the Affidavit to
Authorize Agent attached hereto.
ave any questions, please contact me at 824-8722.
Sin #ld I;J~
Cy hia A. Stokes
E I' ecutive Vice President
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 8th day of January, 2001
by Cynthia A. Stokes, Executive Vice President of United Bank and Trust.
She i~~llY known to me and did not take an oath.
~ ~ .$,...... CNIO\.9ASAll
NOTARY PUBLIC . i.~' ~~ MYCOMMISSIONICC801281
. '. ", EXPIRES: March 14, 2003
'" 8Qnded ThIu Notaly Public Undelwrilers
p.o. Box 14517 St. Petersburg, FL 33733-451 7 (727) 898-2265 MEMBER FDIC
www.unitedbank.com
A United Financial company
AFFIDAVIT TO A~~ZE AGENT
~G & DEVEWPMENT S~ES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 soum MYRTLE A VENUE, 2M FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
l~M. Lo~N
~ UN 1Tt:::~ 13A-NK.. ~ \~uST C0(r1?~1
(Nameoffal/propertyowners) .+Sc:::;e. A-y-;-A'(A-l-E:;i:) ~~--e. at:: b.j.;::>d\HA-~~~?'Nlo Q\b
'Ro\e: OF UN I~ IN ~~ K.e-~L.J€S I FOe A~j ANc..t..
1. That (I am/we are) the owner( s) and record title holder( s) of the following described property:
ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION: ~OU.'T\.U;~c;,.T C~AC\H~\A.W. ~A..\:' ~ Ge.'\..cu.e.~ 2.C;>A.~
- ~~~~~~~ ~o~~~~
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
LEVtl..\" '2. o'i!.valC:>P/^tt~'1 -. ~E.Ol)("l&.\? 'F'€2DI-lT"" c&"ti"t0~cll~ Cl~ "'~nEIii'.:
~\\2.a.J'l."c;. - lA 7" 12.~Th.\\. 5!:l.\.1i5 1:..\4.0 c::;.e'QVlCES (~A,",~)
b-e.v v_ \l!:> t::>/A 'i ~ ,. U Sir.
(Nature of request)
IVl"t\+ ('l)~~LC~
.
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint
~t>\1JA.20 U. \uA.LllrL:l2., j2.
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
i ned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 07"1- day of
cI-?V-n /A....C'J- . A.D" ~ c;)cJtJ/ to me and/or
by . who is personally
Owner) known has produced
. .. C I /~ as identification.
/' . ~ (//
(pro~rtyo~er) C;YN/7-l'I'f A.. iV~t::::S 01:=cc.. i....l!7Vt:- Llc-t I?.
UA! I lEi) d,.::;-Nt<.. ~ . I tCc..J,S I c~jN ;~/f'7 C
/c-'~
~
I
--
SIGNED (Property Owner)
SARAH D. BYARS
" OMMISSION # CC 957797
EXPIRES: July 30. 2004
Bonded Thru NoWy Public underNlillfa
Notary public,
My commission expires:
I,
.
.
.
Prepared by and return to:
Jack R. St. Arnold, Esquire
St. Arnold & Stearns, Chartered
1370 Pinehurst Road
Dunedin, FL 34698
TRUSTEE'S WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE, executed this ~ day of July, 2000, between HOWARD LEE
McCAULEY and SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Trustees of THE McCAULEY CHARITABLE
TRUST under the Declaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995, with full power and authority
to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber or otherwise manage and dispose of said property
pursuant to Florida Statute 689.071, GRANTOR, and LUVERNE M. LOKEN as Trustee of THE
LUVERNE M. LOKEN AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT
dated May 12, 1994, as GRANTEE, whose address is: Z..~/lSfdt L.aA~ ti408 F3;{IJ(JIt', second
party: 33'750
Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include singular and plural,
heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of
corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires.
.
WITNESSETH, that the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.00)
Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by the said
Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and
quitclaim unto the said Grantee forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the
said Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and
being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit:
See Exhibit "A"
Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record,
and taxes for the year 2000 and subsequent years.
Parcel No. 07/29/16/00000/302/0310
and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
The Grantor further warrants that the above described property does not now and
never has constituted Grantor's homestead, and is not now and never has been
contiguous to Grantor's homestead,
.
1
.
.
.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances
thereunto belonging to or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien,
equity and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use,
benefit and behoof of the said Grantee forever.
THIS DEED is executed pursuant to and in the exercise of the power and authority
granted to and vested in said Trustee by the terms of said deed or deeds in trust delivered to
said Trustee in pursuance of the Trust Agreement above mentioned. This deed is made
subject to the lien of every trust deed or mortgage (if there be any) of record in said county
given to secure the payment of money, remaining unreleased at the date of the delivery hereof,
and covenants, conditions, restrictions, and easements of record.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents
the day and year first above written,
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the presence of:
Si9~ i7~~
p~n~~sua<J
~gn.~.~. .~-=
'?Print: ~ /,4+t' e:; .>uJ./~
,-
. srg~?~
Print(A"}--./~/L. ,/ ~;26e4
/6~;;;~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ?-41A day of July,
2000, by HOWARD LEE McCAULEY and SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Directors under the
Declaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995, who is personally known to me or who have
produced fL lJr,VP'rs It.~<;,.fc::;, as identification and who did take an oath, and
acknowledged to and before me that they have executed the foregoing instrument for the
purposes therein expressed. ~
N 'TARY pGBLlC:
,
THE McCAULEY CHARITABLE TRUST
4 ~(1
SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Oi /ctor under
:::::::::--.... eclaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995
,.,......,., JESSICA L KELSEY
,,~~,
[..: 1'J;;.'r;:~ MY COMMISSION # CC 898200
~,~i1.,.o EXPIRES: March 26, 2004
"'~Rf;li\I~' Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwrit9rs
.
2
.
.
.
. ,"
.
.
rXHIBIT tlA"
CoaUnence at the SoutIast comer of the Northwest " or the Southwest " of
Section 7, Township 29 Saurh, R.aqe 16 East, and nUl NcnhOCoJ2'32- East,
33.07 (~t to 1 point CD the Northerly right-of-way ofCouncy Road 2a9 (Sbarhy
Road) run theuct North 89038'49- West II0DJ aaJd Northerly rlpt-of-W2Y line
995.26 f=t lor I PolDf olBeainnina; run tbeuct.North 19038'49- West CCGtiDu-
inJ 1l0DJ said Norther!y rlpt-ot-W21line 262.16 feec to a poi,nc OIl &be Easterly
riaht-or.way lioe ot Bekhet Read; run ~ Nonh 00-01'19- East aJoaa &be
ewerly right-of-way !iDe 159.19 (e:t :0 I point Oa dle Southerly ript-or-way.of
Notthe2st ~m~n Read (County Road No. 2); ~ lUll Nonh.530.53 23-
East lloDJ saJd Souther!y riJllt-ot-way line 230.00 feet; run thence South .
27000'16- East 168.49 (eet, run South 00005'16- West 146.23 (eet to the Point
of Beginning.
.
.
.
II
UNII'ED BANK
January 8, 2001
Planning and Development Services Administration
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Florida
Re: Statement of Contracturallnterest in Property at SE Corner of
Northeast Coachman and Belcher Road
To Whom It May Concern:
.
Please be advised that United Bank and Trust Company has entered into a
purchase agreement with L.M. Loken, the owner of the property located at the
southeast corner of Northeast Coachman Road and Belcher Road, subject to
and contingent upon the Buyer, United Bank, securing a variance to permit the
construction and existence of a branch banking facility on the site.
The Bank has agreed to assume all expenses associated with obtaining a
variance to permit construction of a banking facility of approximately 2,500
square feet with an additional 1 ,100 square feet of covered drive through on the
site. The closing of the contract is to take place prior to April 30, 2001.
The Bank is aware of no other parties with, of course, the exception of the
current owner, L.M. Loken, that have a contractural interest in the property.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 824-8722.
Sine IY'..I /2 \ /./ ..7/.
/ ~ ;{4.~~
CY~~ A. Stokes
Ex=ve Vice President
.
cas
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 8th day of January, 2001
by Cynthia A. Stokes, Executive Vice President of United Bank and Trust.
She is personally known to me and did not take an 0
~ NOTARY PURLI
. . ox t. eters urg, FL 33733-4517 (727) 898-22
www.unitedbank.com
A United Financial company
~~\\!it.'~. CAROL SABAU
~*~ MY COMMISSION it CC 801281
~ rnlRES: March 14,2003
deIr\h'nl Notary Public Underwriters
..
.
.
. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
Northeast Coachman and Belcher Property
Proposed Office Building
Requested Deviations From the Development Standards:
Parking Surface Setbacks Requests -
N. E. Coachman - 25 ft to 15 ft.
Belcher Road - 25 ft. to 15 ft.
Starkey Road - 25 ft. to 5 ft.
East Sideyard - 20 ft. to 10ft.
.
Increase Retail - Bank - 10% to 18%
.
1. In order to develop reasonable use of property as office and limited retail,
deviations from development standards are requested. Because the property is
surrounded on three sides by road right-of-ways, the setback of 25 feet from parking
creates an impractical hardship of reasonable use. We are requesting a reduction to
fifteen feet. United Bank of St. Petersburg believes the location merits a branch bank.
The minimum area for their banking needs is 2,500 square feet which exceeds the
permitted allowable area for retail and services of 10% of the office area by 8%.
2. This development should increase surrounding property values and hopefully cause
other redevelopments. The property value should this project be completed is
estimated at $450,000.00.
3. The cUrrent zoning of "0' office permits the redevelopment 14,300 square feet of
office space in a two story structure. Retail and services space of 10% or 14,300
square feet is permitted. The request is for 2,500 square feet or 18% of retail and
services. Office and limited retail is permitted under office use.
4. The mix use of office and limited retail and services are compatible with the current
retail development and mix use of the surrounding property..
5. There are, of course, other sites suitable for office and banking development within
the City of Clearwater. Office use is permitted within the current office zoning on this
property. United Bank of St. Petersburg believes a bank is needed at this location and
attends to provide such service to the area. Other sites may not have banking needs..
6. The proposed office development will without doubt upgrade the immediate area
along Belcher and N. E. Coachman. Neither the bank or the office use will negatively
affect the adjacent school or the surrounding residential area.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7. The proposed design is straight forward functional solution which should enhance
any character the surrounding properties may have developed. The project will be
compatible with other areas of Clearwater and become an asset to the goals of
redevelopment.
8. The property is surrounded on three sides by streets, Belcher, N. E. Coachman and
Starkey Road. In order to provide adequate oft-street parking we are requesting a
reduction of the required 25 foot setback to parking which is defined as a structure to
15 feet and along Belcher Road and Coachman Road, five foot setback along Starkey
Road and ten foot setback along the east property for paving surface. The building
setbacks or structure setbacks exCeeds those requiredd in the development code.
9. Adeq~ate oft-street parking at a ratio of 4.5 per 1,000 square feet of office area will
be provided. Stacking space for the bank drive-in teller meets or exceeds the city's
requirements.
Prepared by Walker and Associates Architects, P.A.
.
.
.
.
.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT NORTHEAST
COACHMAN AND BELCHER PROPERTY
Proposed Office BuildinQ
Level Two General Standards
1. The proposed two story office building development is within the scale of
development of the surrounding area. This project should enhance the character and
aesthetic quality of the adjacent development. Most of the surrounding area along
Belcher and Coachman is retail. The zoning is currently "0" office.
2. The pr.oposed development should not effect current development and usage of
retail strip centers. The proposed and permitted office will not intrude into the existing
residential areas. This development may in fact encourage appropriate redevelopment
of these properties. This project should increase surrounding property values with the
increased value of proposed property development.
3. The use of the land currently zoned office and used as office with an increase of
retail space (bank) beyond the allowed amount should in no way affect the safety of
persons residing or working in the surrounding area.
4. Access to the property will be limited to one entrance and exit on N. E. Coachman at
east end of the property and one entrance and exit on Starkey Road on into Belcher.
5. The community character of the immediate area (such as is) should only be
improved by this proposed development. The development will include landscape
treatment beyond that required.
6. The hours of normal operation, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. of the bank and offices should
not impact noise, visually on adjacent properties. The proposed increase of retail
space (bank) beyond the 10% allowed under office zoning will not increase any of the
above conditions.
Receipt No: 1199826522 .
Date: 1/26/2001
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description
FL 01-01-04 04 Flexible Commercial
Payments:
Method Payer
Check UNITED BANK
.
Revenue Account No,
Amount Due
$1,205.00
Bank No Acct Check No
48725
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID:
f!~~~
Amount Paid
$1,205.00
$1,205.00
,4
UNITED BANK
*e*************************.
* . END 0 R PAY MEN T
*******************************
No. 048725.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
CHECK DATE: 01/05/01
REFERENCE NUMBER: V0000012960
INVOICE DATE
01/04/01
CHECK DISTRIBUTION
INVOICE NUMBER
01/04/01
AMOUNT
1,205.00
CHECK AMOUNT:
1,205.00
UNITED BANK & TRUST CO
333 3RD AVENUE NORTH
ST PETERSBURG, FL 33701
PHONE:813-898-2265
MEMO
f.lLE
El.-C/I-or.(Jl{
CITY OF CLEARWATER
March 26.2001
Walker - Page 2
PlANNlNG DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, ClEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
March 26. 2001
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (March 20, 2002) and all required certificates of
occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW'
HOUSING DMsrON
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
Mr. Edward W. Walker, Jr.
Walker and Associates Architects, lnc.
701 Enterprise Road Suite 302 I: I L E
Safety Harbor. FL 34695 I:
Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the
construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call Mark T. Parry at
562.4558
.
RE: Development Order regarding case FL 01-01-04 at 601 North Belcher Road
Very truly yours, _
Ge3:k;r~~
Community Development Board
Dear Mr. Walker:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On March 20, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to reduce the front
(south) setback along Sharkey Road from 25 feet to five feet. reduce the front (west)
setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the front (north) setback along
Northeast Coachman Road from 25 feet to 15 feet and to increase the square footage of
retail sales and service use from 10 percent (1,433 square feet) to 18 percent (2,500
square feet) in the Office District as part of a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment
Project. The proposal includes a 14,330 square foot building with 11,850 square feet of
office and 2.500 square feet ofbank use.
Based on the application and the staffrecommendation, the Board found that the proposal
is in compliance with the standards and criteria for a Comprehensive lnfill
Redevelopment Project, the maximum development potential standards and all other
applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community
Development Board approved the application with the following two conditions:
.
I) That the architecture of the building be revised to include a sloped roof or other,
similar architectural features; and
2) That all signage meets Code.
S:\PJanning Department\C D B1FLEXI/nnacrive or Finished Applications\Belcher N 601 United Bank and Trust - Approved\Belcher
N60J DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
j.B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, COMMISSIONER
*
BOB ClARK, COMMISSIONER
F. DAVID HEMEIUCK, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYh1ENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORID~ 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
February 26, 2001
Mr. Edward W. Walker, Jr.
Walker and Associates Architects, Inc.
701 Enterprise Road
Suite 302
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
RE: Community Development Board Meeting (~
Dear Mr. Walker:
The application that you submitted for property located at 601 North Belcher Road has
been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on March 20,
2001.
The meeting will take place at 1 :OOpm, in the City Commission Chambers, ')rd floor of
City Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4558.
Sincerely yours,
/-j
(v{A-.------
U
...:..-,
Mark T. Parry
Planner
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending ApplicationslBelcher N 601 United Bank and TrustlBe/cher N 601 cdb letter. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
lB. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, COMMISSIONER
*
BOB ClARK, COMMISSIONER
F. DAVID HEMERICK, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
~
....
.
.
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S MYRTLE AVE.
POBOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748
OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567
FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576
TO:
E.D. Armstrong
w
FAX#:
441.8617
DATE:
and Develo ment Services Cit of Clearwater
FROM:
MESSAGE:
Re: 1100 South Missouri Avenue; Renaissance Square
I need the following information/items prior to the February 15,2001 DRC meeting. While the
application has been scheduled for the February 15, 2001 DRC, it is technically incomplete
without the following information and/or items:
1. Copy of Plat
2. Names of all persons with contractual interest in the property
3. The following information is required for all site plans and is missing from the submitted
one:
· All dimensions;
· Site plan with minimum of 1 :50' engineering scale;
· The foot and size of each building;
· All required setbacks;
· All required site triangles;
· Location of all private and public easements;
· Location of existing private and public utilities including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary
sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines;
· Depictions by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped
areas;
· Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening;
· Location of all landscape material;
· Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
· Locations of all existing and proposed sidewalks;
· Gross floor area devoted to each use (building);
· Size and species of all landscape material;
· Height and type of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
· Tree survey.
I '"
.
.
4. Landscape plan;
5. Irrigation plan or notes;
6. Grading plan
7. Signage;
8. One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
9. Offsite elevations;
10. All open spaces areas;
11. Lot lines and building lines dimensioned;
12. Streets and drives dimensioned;
13. Building and structural setbacks dimensioned;
14. Structural overhangs; and
15. Tree inventory prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees" DBH or greater, reflecting the
size, canopy (drip lines) and conditions of such trees.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558.
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Two (2)
.
CITY OF
.
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
January 30, 2001
Mr. Edward W. Walker, Jr.
Walker and Associates Architects, Inc.
701 Enterprise Road
Suite 302
Safety Harbor, FL 34695
RE:
EILE
Application for Flexible Standard development (FI 01-01-04) request to reduce the front
(south) setback along Sharkey Road from 25 feet to five feet, reduce the front (west)
setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the front (north) setback
along Northeast Coachman Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side (east) setback
from 20 feet to 10 feet and to increase the square footage of retail sales and service from
10% (1,433 square feet) to 18% (2,500 square feet) for a 14,330 square foot office
building in the Office District
Dear Mr. Walker:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project as outlined above at 601 North Belcher Road and determined that the application is
complete.
The application will be reviewed for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC)
on February 15,2001 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second
floor of the Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. Please call
Sandy Harriger at 562.4582 no earlier than one-week prior to the meeting date for your review
time.
You or your client need to be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4558.
Sincere,ly yours,
"
I r\~'-.
{\~ r
Mark T. Parry
Planner
S:\Planning Department\C 0 B\FLEX\Pending Applications\Belcher N 601 United Bank and Trust\Belcher N 601 complete.doc
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
J.B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, COMMISSIONER
*
BOB ClARK, COMMISSIONER
ED HOOPER, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
UNITED BANK OFFICE COMPLEX
Prepared For
WALKER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Prepared By
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
5023 West Laurel Street
Tampa, Florida 33607
813-289-0039
February, 2001
Project No. L01023-F
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PaQe
Introduction............................................................... ........ ........ .......... .................... 1
Project Traffic...............................................,....... .................................. ................ 1
Project Traffic Distribution...................,................. ...................................... ............ 4
Link Analysis....,........................................................... ........................................... 4
Intersection Analysis....,..,....................................................................................... 7
Appendices
LIST OF TABLES
1 Estimated Driveway Volume........................................................................ 1
2 Estimated New Project Traffic (PM Peak).................................................... 3
3 Link Analysis.......................................................................,..... ............. ...... 6
4 Intersection Analysis (PM Peak) ................................. ................................. 7
LIST OF FIGURES
1 Project Location. .... ... ........ ............,. .................. ........ ......... .....,.................... 2
2 Estimated Project Traffic.............................................................................. 5
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-i-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
It is proposed to construct a 14,330 square foot office building with a 2,500 square foot
drive in bank at the southeast corner of Belcher Road and N.E. Coachman Road in
Clearwater, Florida, as shown on Figure 1.
Access to the site will include a connection to N.E. Coachman Road and access to
Belcher Road via Sharkey Road, The purpose of this report is to document the traffic
demands of the proposed project and to analyze the adjacent roadway level of service.
PROJECT TRAFFIC
Table 1 identifies the estimated driveway volumes for the proposed project based on the
Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997.
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED DRIVEWAY VOLUME (1)
AM PM
Land Use Size ADT In Out In Out
General Office 11 ,830 SF 258 30 4 16 77
Bank 2,500 SF 663 18 14 68 68
Total 14,330 SF 921 48 18 84 145
(1) Based on ITE Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. See Appendix A.
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I~""'~ i,;~~~ ".,~..;..~ ~::(--' ~~.,
= d e:~~ " ~...
I r.: - .. ~ t~ ~ .~~ii 0" I_n~ Sf Sf 1< k ~...
i ~.. ~ ;th,";o:: KS -. ~G..~ ~wY ,-"l}'.t:':, fs CEAf
'~ !! ilW' I t1l~ [ ; :1.: Sf ---.*~a4~ L
-- g T.... 01 ..~ CEN,;J'ltU isl;y ~~I~ l ~ tE
~3 S~.~[;' 6~, ri Ii 6 -. 0 ~ni:j~ ~;R~~S I,' ~:[
I <;H~RWor ,l.PA~ - -~ ~ r: ~L :1 is ~J; q~;'; -:.. .jl"P" - . -~, z ,~ f,
S1 .~~.,--~ .j i .... I 'T, '-~'. ...~ ~8~' ~. lZJ~.
InVl'RI~A ST or' ... - 1M) . / . ~~~', - ,. _. Oil . J
~ ~tTER RANG I .lo ~~1J",. ;Y41~" ..S~. ~r' , .
\1 1'1'" ~A~. ~r.'G14 .:7. ..::;t~__ ~ Y(59iF'~'bJ< .... .'.
~ ~ - r..:.':!__, li't,;. ~- ~.l-:..;.:, " ~
~~ "~ji:~ ~r~ ;~O:JECTr -~/ - '
M ~II.~ ........~;,.,l ~p.:~ _
~o>... 1 ;"'<."'." :"RwooO~i .....1...,t..:~<'.;.,....;
l <'\:.~;; ~,",_I ",""ClENfWATER ~.'..' . ~~~~E~..~tf. ,~~.; ",
ut ...... . <', . ;_..1 \ R~cnON o:t:7' ")REW i"l,
. , _ ~ : ) I ~} /. ,. - r ~ .. .,')'.~" 11
:; ,,~ . .+ - "'-"'OOlSTJp, riJl$li,ihi
,- · "-,1- I . JmO<> _ - ~~,., 'uftk,. < fu
, Ii !i,n ~~~: ~8 1:',~:6~;; ::fJ'lll~~
.sI 111~ \ 1&., ~G~ ~ULF 8 3~ I; Lr=~~," ~!~ ~ dsriL~~
I DtIGL CH A~II tw I< .. ~l 'Ib .,~~ ':"::WA~~R.;~ :-11', ~
~~~~;~ ~:,' ]~ ~'.. Ul. ~ :
- -5- G'16 u: .._. J-. NOR;, ~ '[Al(WOOOoo
,~I! .-;Jiwv. bflJ!l ~~il; -\ ~ t? I jjll~ \6
~ i ~~ :....ot.::...1t'il ~ (i...-A1 J I!!;;; I .rL:.ar"': ~ ''!<U::QV{......
BEL i ~~3' ~ICil~J I f.~~:~ i rnJ fir 1 f'Sr CENTER
~OO:N" J! ~GLE *' I ~; 1 T d~~l t :~:~N'...l[ ~~; J
11
LIi
~
l'
~
I
I
':
I
-.
c, It
H
~
~
r~
1<,
Jil
rl
~
FIGURE 1
PR~CT LOCATION
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
These data indicate the project could attract an estimated 921 daily trip ends with 66
AM and 229 PM peak hour trip ends.
Based on Pinellas County and ITE data, a portion of the project traffic is estimated to
already be on the adjacent roadways. Table 2 identifies the estimated passerby capture
trip ends and new trip ends for the project during the higher volume PM peak hour.
TABLE 2
ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT TRAFFIC (PM PEAK)
New Trip
Total Ends
New Trip Total
Land Use In Out PercentaQe In Out Passerby (3)
General Office 16 77 92.0% (1) 15 76 2
Bank 68 68 53.0% (2) 36 36 64
Total 84 145 51 112 66
(1) Based on Pine lias County Impact Fee Ordinance Data (See Appendix B).
(2) Based on ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 1998 (See Appendix B).
(3) Passerby Capture not to exceed 10 percent of adjacent traffic.
Belcher Road = 2,599
N.E. Coachman Road = 1,084
3,683 x 10% = 368 = 184 in, 184 out> 66
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-3-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
These data indicate the project could attract 51 inbound and 112 outbound new trip
ends during the PM peak hour. Additionally, it is estimated that 66 passerby trip ends
(33 in, 33 out) could be attracted from the adjacent roadway traffic.
PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
Based on recorded traffic patterns at the intersection of Belcher Road and N.E.
Coachman Road, the new and passerby project trip ends were assigned to the adjacent
street system, as shown in Figure 2.
LINK ANALYSIS
Table 3 identifies the current link volumes and capacities with and without the new
project trip ends on the adjacent street system.
These data indicate the existing roadway system can provide an acceptable level of
service for the proposed project plus background traffic.
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-4-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
o
Q:
IS
9
LLI
CD
^
~
-
co
~
-
~o~~
^""'~~~
co~~' ·
~~ ~6)~6.7
~
^^
'V"
_v
~-
_co PROJECT
-It')
-
SITE
^ ^
co
~ 'i;j
- -
co It')
~ 01
- -
~ L. (68)<20> J
.- (27)<8> STARKEY ROAD
r (39)<23> -J
^
.
v
-
",
-
-
LEGEND
(20) = NEW TRIP ENDS
<14> = P ASSER8Y TRIP ENDS
FIGURE 2
ESTIMATED PROJECT TRAmC
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-5-
-------------------
Roadway
TABLE 3
LINK ANALYSIS
Peak
Background Project Total
SeQment Capacity (1) Volume ( 1 ) Traffic (2) Traffic Concurrent
Sunset pt. To N.E. Coachman Rd, 1,598 1,430 (NB) 56 (NB) 1 ,486 Yes
N.E. Coachman Rd. to Drew St. 1,677 1,430 (NB) 13 (NB) 1 ,443 Yes
Drew St. to Belcher Rd. 992 681 (EB) 6 (EB) 687 Yes
Belcher Rd. to Old Coachmen Rd. 992 707 (EB) 17 (EB) 724 Yes
I
0'\
I Belcher Rd,
N.E. Coachman Rd.
(1) Based on Pinellas County MPO 2000 Level of Service Report (See Appendix C). Peak directions based on Pinellas County
Turning Movement Counts at Belcher Road and N.E. Coachman Road.
(2) From Figure 2.
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
Turning movement counts were obtained from Pinellas County for the adjacent
intersection of Belcher Road and N.E. Coachman Road. Based on historic counts
provided by the County, it appears that traffic has been decreasing on these roadways
in recent years and, therefore, the recorded counts in 1996 are probably high and
represent a worst case condition. However, based on these data, Table 4 identifies the
expected level of service at the adjacent intersection with and without the project traffic.
TABLE 4
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS (PM PEAK) (1)
Intersection
Without Project
Delay LOS
With Project
Delay LOS
Belcher Rd. and N.E.
Coachman Rd.
o
o
51.4
54.7
(1) See Appendix 0 for intersection turning movement counts, Appendix E for historic
growth rates and Appendix F for capacity analysis.
These data indicate the existing geometry and signal operation can provide an
acceptable Level of Service "0" condition with or without the added project traffic.
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-7-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDICES
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I
I
II
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
TRIP GENERATION DATA
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
Summary of Multi-Use Trip Generation
Average Weekday Driveway Volumes
January 30, 2001
Land Use
Size
General Office Building
11.83 Th.Gr.Sq.Ft.
Drive-in Bank 2.5 Th.Gr.Sq.Ft.
Total
24 Hour
Two-Way
Volume
258
663
921
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997.
.
AM Pk Hour PM Pk Hour
Enter Exit Enter Exit
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
30
18
48
4
14
18
16
68
77
68
84
145
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
PASSERBY CAPTURE DATA
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
11 Ir r- ~U-u ~ ~ 'I ir cr ~ ~I-' ~-..' .-..~..;
Table 5.26
Pass-By Trips and Diverted Linked Trips
Weekday, P.M. Peak Period
Land Use 912-Drlve-in Bank
SIZE DNERTED ADJ. STREET
(1,000 sa. WEEKDAY NO. OF TIME PRIMARY NON-PASS. LINKED PASS-BY PEAK HOUR
FEET GFA) LOCATION SURVEY DATE INTERVIEWS PERIOD TRIP(%) BY TRIP (%) TRIP(%) TRIP(%) VOLUME
16.0 Overland Park, KS Dec, 1988 20 4:30-5:30 P,M. 55 30 15 n/a
3,3 Louisville area, KY Jul. 1993 n/a 4-6 P,M. 22 30 48 2,570
3.4 Louisville area, KY Jul. 1993 n/a 4-6 P.M, 22 14 64 2,266
3.4 Louisville area, KY Jul. 1993 75 4-6 P.M. 11 32 57 1,955
3.5 Louisville area, KY Jun, 1993 53 4-6 P,M. 32 21 47 2,785
6.4 Louisville area, KY Jun, 1993 66 4-6 P.M, 20 27 53 2,610
e
SOURCE
n/a
Barton-Aschman Assoc,
Barton-Aschman Assoc.
Barton-Aschman Assoc.
Barton-Aschman Assoc.
Barton-Aschman Assoc,
Average Pass-By Trip Percentage: 47
5! .
"0
(j)
co
:;)
~
a
o'
:;)
I
~
:;)
a.
8
^
9
~
~
01
.
~
....,
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE REPORT DATA
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I"
..
I
I,
I:
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
,
e
.
......
"\...
2000 LEVEL OF SERVICE REPORT
Prepared by:
Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization
May 10, 2000
. . .
Arterial LOS Section
Sec No On Street Between Length Class Area Method FIHS STD MSV Speed LOS
AdJ '" '" Free
SM No Exd Flow Nt Sign8ICyc Trav Segmenl Segment
Id FromITo AAOT K 0 Vol Flow PHF PallTums SpeedT T Len glC C8 v/c Time S LOS
56 NE Coachman Rd McMullen-Booth and US 19 1.18 ml 2 Urb A N D 1,038 30.90 B
42~ v McMullen-Booth to Landmar1< Dr 2U 0.00 0.28 0 A2 17,660 .091 . 0.568 913 1,8l5O .925 0 12 45" Combined with next downstream Iign8Hzed segment
4250 V Landmar1< Dr to US 19 2U 0.00 0.92 1 A2 17,680 .091 . 0.588 913 1.8l5O .925 0 18. 45" ~ A 120 .460' 960 0.952 137.4 30.90 B
32 NE Coachman Rd US 19 and Drew St 1.78 ml 2 Urb A N 0 1,051 29.80 B
4260 V US 19 to Old Co8chman Rd 2U 0.00 0.70 1 A2 17.046 .091 . 0.588 681 1,850 . .925 0 12 45" ~ A 80' .500' 972 0.906 83.9 3001
4270 V Old Coachman Rd to Belcher Rd 2U 0.00 0.81 1 A2 13.691 .091. 0.1568 707 1.850 .925 0 12 45" ~ A 150' .510' 992 0.713 76.1 28.83
4280 V Belcher Rd to Drew SI 2U 0.00 0.47 0 A2 13,183 .091. 0.588 681 1,850 .925 0 12 35" Combined with next downstream Iigntlllzed segment
1490 Nebraska Av US 19 (S) and Belcher Rd 0.51 ml 2 Urb A N 0 1,147 30.12 0
1490 ^ US 19 (S) to Belcher Rd 2U 0.00 0.51 0 2U 16,382 .091 0.588 848 1,850 .925 0 12 3S' 1,711 0.495 60.9 30.12 0
1500 Nebraska Av Belcher Rd and CR 1 (Omaha St 1.01 ml 0 Urb A N 0 603 0
1500 ^ Belcher Rd to CR 1 (Omaha St 2U 0.00 1.01 1 NSO 9,580 .091 0.588 494 1.800 .925 0 18 3S' ~ A. 120 .320' 851 0.759 0
1510 Nebraska Av CR 1 (Omaha St and Alt US 19 0.19 ml 2 Urb A N 0 1,147 32.36 B
1510 ^ CR 1 (Omaha St to AIt US 19 2U 0.00 0.19 0 2U 9,560 .091 0.588 494 1.850 .925 0 12 3S' 1.711 0.289 21.1 32.38 B
2460 New SR 580 SR 584 and St Petersburg 0 1.10 ml 2 Urb A N 0 2,186 41.45 A
2480 ^ SR 584 to St Petersburg 0 40 0.00 1.10 1 A2 18,584 .091 . 0.588 857 1,850 .925 0 12 50 ~ A 120 .520' 2.022 0.424 95.5 41.45
2223 Northslde Dr Countryside BI and US 19 0.75 ml 0 Urb A N 0 603 C
2223 ^ Countryside BI to us 19 2U 0.00 0.75 1 NSO 3,563 .091 0.578 . 188 1,800 .925 0 18 35" 3 A. 120 .320' 851 0.287 C
4290 Nursery Rd US 19 (S) and Belcher Rd 1.08 ml 2 Urb A N 0 841 25.59 C
4290 ^ us 19 (S) to Belcher Rd 2U 0.00 1.08 1 A2 11,028 .091 0.568 570 1,8l5O .925 0 12 3S' 4 A. 120 .400' 778 0,733 151.9 25.59 C
76 Nursery Rd Keene Rd and Belcher Rd 1.02 ml 2 Urb A N 0 m 21.45 0
4300 V Keene Rd to Hercules Av 2U 0.00 O.l5O 1 A2 9,753 .091 0.568 504 1.850 .925 0 12 3S' 4 A'12O .400' 778 0.848 83.8 21.53 0
4305 V Hercules Av to Belcher Rd 2U 0.00 0.52 1 A2 9,753 .091 0.568 504 1,850 .925 0 12 3S' 4 S 120 .400' 778 0.848 87.5 21.37 0
Notes:
Method: "A" - "Art-Plan","T" - Tables Arr Typ: 1=Very Poor. 2=Unfavorable. 3-Random, 4-Favorable, 5=Hlghly FaVOl'8b1e. 8-ExcepllOnal . Denotes velue different from FOOT "default".
ALF .. AddJOrop.off lane factor Facility Types: F"Fraeway. A1 .. Int. Flow Arterial, Class 1. MU" Multi-lane Uninterrupted. 2U" Two-Iane Uninterrupted, NSMaJ" Non-State Major, NSO = Non-state other
^ , V = Peak Direction Indication For R2LN Facility type, % Exclusive Passing Lane Is In Cye Len field
Tfndale-Ollver and Associates, Inc. Appendix. 83
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0
ArterIal . LOS Sectlon l>:>
, ,
l>:>
See No On Street Between Length Clan Area Method FIHS STD MSV Speed LOS ....
"-
Ad! % % FI88 0
....
lanes/ . Fac Set No E)lCI Flow IVr SlgnalCye Tray Segment Segment
Id FtomfTo Type AlF I..englh Sla TWl MDT K 0 Vol Flow PHF PauTums 5peedTypeType Len we Cap vie Time Speed LOS ~
m
t::l
28 Belcher Rd Solon Av and Countryside BI 2.92 ml 2 Urb A N D 1,682 . 28.15 C ....
2710 ^ ~r 811D CouI*y&lde BI 4D 0.00 0.29 1 A2. 27.998 .091 0.588 1.447 1.8S0 .925 0 12 35" 4 A'12O .400' 1,558 0.930 68.3 15.27 E (l)
..
0
-..)
Belcher Rd Countryside BI and Sunset Point 1.34 ml Urb "':I
27 2 A N D 3,091 30.63 B ~
2720 ^ Counlrytlide 81 to MonIclair Rd 60 0.00 1.04 2 A2. 30.780 .091 0.588 1,589 1,850 .925 0 12 45" 4 A . 148' .590' 3,442 0.462 110.3 33.94 B .
2730 ^ MonIcIIIlr ReI ID Sooset PoInt Rd 80 0.00 0.30 1 A2 30,760 .091 0.588 1,589 1,860 .925 0 12 41i' 4 A . 14S .490' 2,859 0.558 47.1 22.90 C
l>:>
00
2740 Belcher Rd Sunset Point Rd and HE 1.27 ml 2 Urb A N D 1,598 29.29 B -..)
0
2740 ^ SIIl'lI8t PoInt Rd ID He CoecIwn8n ReI 4D 0.00 1.27 A2. 27,685 .091 0.5ell 1.430 1,8S0 .925 0 12 4B' .. A . 14S .380' 1,478 0.1l6ll 15Cl.1 29.29 B (l)
-..)
~
72 Belcher Rd NE Coachman Rd and SR 60 0.80ml 2 Urb A N D 843 11.30 F
2750 ^ HE CcIIchrn8n Rd to 0.- SI 4U 0.00 0.29 A2. 27,685 .091 o.eea 1.430 1.aso .925 0 0 35" 4 A' 150' .490' 1,677 0.853 61.1 17.07 0
2780 ^ Or.. St ID CIIMIland SI . 4U 0.00 0.17 A2. 28.861 .091 0.5ell 1.377 1,860 .925 0 0 35" 4 S 160" .390' 1,335 t.032 82.0 7.46 F
2770 ^ CIeIIIland 5t ID SR eo 4U 0.00 0.34 A2. 28,191 .091 0.5ell 1.457 1 ,&eO .925 0 0 35" 4 5 150' .400' 1,369 1.064 111.5 10.97 F r'"
-
Z
C"':l
2780 Belcher Rd SR 80 and Druid Rd 0.26 ml 2 Urb A N D 1 10.41 F ~
CIl
2780 ^ SR 10 to Drulcl Rd 4D 0.00 0.211 2 A2 29,730 .091 O.eeo . 1.768 1.aso .826 0 12 35" 4 5 160" .500' 1,&45 0.904 89.9 10.41 F ll'>
;>
CIl
CIl
73 Belcher Rd Druid Rd and Nursery Rd 1.02 ml 2 Urb A N 0 1,884 20.76 0 0
C"':l
-
2790 ^ DNid Ad ID N..-y Rd 40 0.00 t.02 2 A2 29,730 .091 0.8liO . 1.758 1,l1S) - ,928 0 12 40 4 A . 140' .480' 1,788 0.983 178.8 20.76 0 .
43 Belcher Rd Nu....ry Rd and E Bay tJr 1.80 ml 2 Urb A N 0 1,815 21.79 D
2800 ^ Nu.-y Ad ID e.u.r ReI 40 0.00 0.25 1 A2 28.979 .091 0.850 · 1.714 1.aso .925 0 12 40 4 A . 140' .450' 1.7se 0.979 67.9 13.24 E
4e6O ^ BelIIeIr Ad ID E 8lIy Dr 40 0.00 1.55 2 A2 28.227 .091 0.588 1.~ 1,860 .026 0 12 40 3" A . 140' .440' 1.711 0.853 229.4 24.32 C
74 Belcher Rd E Bay Dr and Ulmerton Rd 1.53 ml 2 Urb A N D 2,775 29.21 B
4Il6O ^ E8lIyDrID 142ndAyN 80 0.00 1.01 2 A2 33,983 .091 0.!l88 1,758 1,850 .925 0 12 41i' 4 A' 120 .520' 3,034 0.579 117.8 30.86 B
4670 ^ 142nd Av N ID UImer1Dn ReI 80 0.00 0.52 1 A2 33.983 .091 0.568 1,7!i8 1.aso .925 0 12 4B' 4 A' 130' .440' 2.567 0.684 70.7 26.45 C
6190 Belcher Ref Ulmerton Rd and Bryan Dairy Rd 1.58 ml 2 Urb A N 0 2,523 30.43 B
Nota:
MIIhOd: "A". "M-Pl8n". 'T"" Tables An Typ: 1.VeIy Poor, 2=Unfhorable, 3aR8ndom.. 4=Favorable. 5aHIghIy F8VllnIbIe. ~..I . Denotes value dilferenl from FOOT 'default".
AlE .. AddIDrop.oIf IIIne factot Facility Typ8I: F=FIMWlIy, A1 .. Inl Flow Art8r1BI. CIa. 1, MU = MJW.Iane Uninfllrrupl8d, 2U .. Two.Iane lMlntsmJpled, NSMaj = Non-StaIB Major, N50" Non-6lale other ~
^ , V = Peak DInIdlon indication For R2lN FlICIity type, % EIlClu8lY8 P8IIIng lMle II In eye Len field
Tlndale-OIlver and AssocIates, Inc. Appendix. . 49 0
0
l>:>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX D
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
- - - !- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TIME: 7.11AM,2.6PM
- -
BELCHeR ROAD & COACHMAN ROAD
ALL VEHICLES
BY: 08-400
)
7:00 7 140 1 154 Q 173 5 225 m 3 48 20 6Q 10 51 29 IlO 1. 53e
7:'5 20 196 10 228 n 300 10 390 810 ~ 39 2:3 88 .0 89 31 110 .71 792
7:30 1<4 .2HI 9 239 15 2118 18 381 GO 6 52 4i 107 12 &'J 36 130 ~7 f!&1
. ~
8:00 22. 2S2 7 281 88 266 1~ 346 m 10 88 es 143 19 76 31 128 288 -
8:15 ~ 236 8 xn 58 249 32 m 81<4 II 71 44 123 18 '" 42 145 2S8 8821
8:45 Z1 246 8 281 58 196 15 289 550 8 86 40 11<4 22 79 33 1S4 248
. : .,. "l;" . . <<.. ... . . . ~. .. .~.:
9:00 21 218 t1 248 39 175 21 235 483 1~ 88. 31 111 111 82 38 11<4 225 708
9:15 22 197 .0 229 32 Hie 13 213 442 11 57 43 111 12 58 35 iDS 218' 85lI
9:30 2& 206 5 239 40 1&4 17 241 480 11 <47 40 ga 22 58 34 112 210 l!I9O
9:.t5 28 2.4 8 248 <42 170 15 r:I1 <473 3 70 30 .03 18 '68 42 121 23' 704
, ! .. ,
. . .
10:00 24 ZZ1 5 258 30 1&4 14 208 44 15 39 43 B8 2fI eo 31 117 - -
10:15 29 221 6 2S1S 44 180 21 225 .0181 8 54 Q 1G7 2<4 58 31 113 m 701
10:30 32 217 4 253 51 163 12 22tl 478 10 G 47 106 33 5& 43 132 238 717
10:45 28 214 4 248 33 197 2S 2SS 501 12 59 42 113 25 81 41 .27 24) 7<4.
.* 1 . . t.l
4. .S .. ) . 11
1..:00 17 270 5 29Z 26 171 2<4 221 513 9 84 ~ 115 29 53 4S 137 2S2 78S
1~:'5 2<4 314 4 342 Xl 170 22 2.9 SOl S as 53 123 2fI 55 30 111 ZS4 79S
1":30 28 273 3 304 'S7 189 17 243 S47 8 83 42 113 26 85 34 .25 238 786
1<4:0116 '29 290 B 31J 3S 187 25 247 57<4 4 . 49 122 2S 80 32 137 2SQ B33
. ~. . . ~ it.. .. !l )0:.... . I , t ..
. 11
..
15:00 44 291 B 343 %1 1M 38 2-49 582 4 88 10 182 23 B2 38 141 303 895
15:15 40 317 4 381 2S 181 25 m 588 8 78 13 157 39 eo <41 ,4) 'N7 895
15:30 33 328 4 353 37 .84 23 244 eo7 2. 82 81 145 rf 83 38 128 rf1 818
15:45 48 308 2 3S8 33 '112 30 225 581 8 78 70 158 29 82 29 120 2.71 fJIfi1
~1:>=. ~ I:W~~tfr~ - - -- __ii~i.11 ;m~ ~ -
.. ......... .. ... : .,,'" .... ;:.' ., .. it" . ::,'. . ....... ...~.. ..;..
. . '. ~. .'
18:00 23 319 2 344 33 183 21 'D7 581 e 98 80 182 13 TJ. 36 121 30S e&4
16:15 20 355 7 382 Zl. '80 22 229 811 9 73 <47 129 17 eo 34 131 280 811
18:30 21 324 5 360 54 2ftl 31 301 851 4 101 82 167 24 69 38 129 2Sl8 947
17:00 35 388 7 428 43 236 36 314 742 5 77 !3 145 21 75 32 128 273 1015
17:15 37 388 9 432 42 204 22 268 700 8 88 98 192 .7 53 33 113 305 1005
17:30 Xl' 3T8 6 411 44 20' on 282 6&3 5 91 67 183 18 88 23 10e 292 S85
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX E
HISTORIC GROWTH RATES
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J HN-..) 1. - C:~~IJ.
~'::i;~::>
itLLH:::' LUUN I T
.LHI'lI'l ! I'lL>
.
rc:..f ....0.... ......LJJ
r .. 1ICJc../ t:JJ
PINELLAS COUNTY MPO
Count History Report
On Street: SR590,NE COACHMAN RD
Counter L~.tiCln: SW OF BELCHER RD
TocIay's Date: 01/3012001
Count Station Number: 5184.0
COUf1t
Year Date of CClU nt Sourr;e AADT
1990 03/13/1990 CLwTR 14028
1991 10/2211991 FOOT 15842
1991 06/04/1991 CLWTR 14572
1992 04/28/1992 CLWTR 14630
1993 04120/1993 CLWTR 18376
1994 04/19/1994 CLWTR 14046
1995 05125/1995 CLWTR 15513
1996 04/16/1996 CLWTR 14245
1997 05/15/1997 CLWTR 13612
1998 04/23/1998 CLWTR 14484
1999 04/22/1999 CLWTR 13183
200..
t....
"....
".00'
t21GO
1000'
-...
eaoo
._tla
zaoo
I
j
i
i
. ~..,
Peak
Averago
Volume
1351
1246
1219
1319
1066
Regression analysis
Peak to Peak Peak
Dally $e..on Season
Ratio DT Peak Hour
0.000 13776 0
0.085 17512 1437
0.000 16035 0
0.000 15496 0
0.000 20418 0
0.000 14480 0
0.080 16329 1326
0.085 14838 1297
0.000 15803 0
0.091 17711 1516
0.080 15951 1225
J;
l!!
! i
-'.ar.......1
~
i
s
~
Regression Equation
Calculated AADT = (-189.283 * Year) + 352357.61
Growth: -'.21263%
Tindale-Oliver and Associates
Page Number: 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
JHN-Jl-~lQlQl
eLLK.:> LUUI'l I T
1Q':;l;IQ::>
rLHI'4I'4!I'4U
.
r",,"r
~o...... ......J....J..J
PINELLAS COUNTY MPO
Count History Report
On Street: BELCHER RD
Counter Location: N OF NE COACHMAN RD
Today'$ Date: 01/30/2001
Co,","t Station Number: 1049,n
Count
Year Dale of Count Source AADT
1990 03/13/1990 CLWTR 26569
1991 01/14/1991 MPO 30111
1991 06104/1991 CLWTR 28378
1992 04/2811992 CLWTR 25856
1993 04/27/1993 CLWTR 29167
1994 04/12/1994 CLWTR 29173
1995 04/25/1995 CLWTR 29192
1996 04/30/1996 CLWTR 36319
1999 0411311999 ClWTR 27685
..Goao
;)500.
.0000
1,006
1.aDa
1.00.
.0.0.
,Ood
!
i
i
Peak
Average
Volume
2546
2411
2624
3265
2436
111;.",."1." .......'.IS.
I
Peak to Peak Peak
Dally S.ason Season
Ratio DT Peak Hour
0,000 26177 0
0.084 33136 2709
0.000 31228 0
0.000 28209 0
0.000 32346 0
0.082 30075 2565
0.089 30728 2791
0.089 37832 3473
0.087 34217 2800
.
_,.........nl
i
II
s:
i
I
. ...41
Regression Equation
Caleulated MDT - (353.938" Year) -676394.47
Growth: 1.13708%
Tindale-OliVer and Associates
Page Number: 1
1'-' ~'-J~ ~""..J..J
t'"" lN~LLH:::' L.UUf'41 I rLHI~I~!t'fU
.
.
JHN-J~-~~~~ ~~'~J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PINELLAS COUNTY MPO
Count History Report
On Street: BELCHER RD
COunter Location: S OF DREW ST
Today's Date: 01/30/2001
Count Station Number: CL03,n
Peak to Peak Peak
Daily Season Season
Ratio DT Peak Hour
0.000 31784 0
0.000 32655 0
0.077 31460 2519
0.076 31285 2414
0.075 29571 2266
0.000 38997 0
0.082 32939 2521
Peak
Average.
Volume
Count
Year Date of Count Source AADT
1992 04/28/1992 CLWTR 29133
1993 05/06/1993 CLWTR 29541
1994 04/12/1994 CLWTR 30516
1995 04/2511995 CLWTR 29721
1996 04/18/1996 CLWTR 28388
1997 04/15/1997 CLWTR 32909
1999 04/13/1999 MPO 26651
2368
2269
2130
2193
ft.,r..'I." .".',sIS
U...
1i.e.u.l
lOot.
2001')4
'!lieu.
,.oot
....
I
I
i
I i
-r.,r....." I
i
s
. ......
Regression Equation
Calculated MOT = (.164.623 "' Year) + 357997.59
Growth: -0.56931%
Page Number: 1
TIndafe-Oliver and Associates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
I
JHN-~i-~~~i ~~'~J
Todays Date: 01/30/2001
Count Station Number: 5185,0
Count
Year Date of Count Source
1991 10/15/1991 FOOT
1992 12122/1992 FDOT
1992 12/09/1992 FOOT
1993 02115/1993 FDOT
1994 03/16/1994 FOOT
1995 03/01/1995 FOOT
1996 01/01/1996 FOOT
1999 05111/1999
,.0CJ.
,"ODa
12400
1.0..
'.0.
ID..
.O,a
2eaa
..
!:
"9""":_..._,_ "".!........ __~ A_...__:.....__
..... 1 Nt:.LLH::> L.UUl'l " r LMI 'I' 'I .. 'IU
.
I.c:..l .....\...1_ .......a...JJ
.
PINELLAS COUNTY MPO
Count History Report
On Street: SR590,NE COACHMAN RD
Counter Loution: NE OF BELCHER RD
Peak P~ulk to Peak Peak
Average Oaily Season Season
AADT Volume RatIo DT Peak Hour
14732 1206 0.081 16284 1283
14598 1183 0.081 15926 1259
14199 1282 0.090 15490 1364
12194 1011 0.083 13609 1082
12710 418 0.032 13103 445
14142 1163 0.082 14886 1237
14200 1194 0.084 15106 1270
13691 1117 0.081 15737 1284
R.O,...I.. ."..,.....
.
i
i
I ·
i
il
..
_r..,...i_nJ
i
I
...1
Regression Equation
Calculated MOT = (-62.229" Year) + 137893.21
Growth: -0.46106%
P",nf'! NIII'I'II'lp.r: 1
TOTAL P.05
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX F
INTERSECTION CAPACITY SHEETS
LINCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
HCS: s.nalized
Inter: Belcher @ ne Coachman
Analyst: Lincks
late: 2/20/01
/W St: NE Coachman
Intersections Re11lte 3.2
City/St: Pinellas Co.
proj #:
Period: PM Peak WITHOUT PROJECT
N/S St: Belcher
I
I Eastbound
I L T R
I
I 110
I L TR
1320 342 19
112.0 12.0
I 0
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound
I L T R I L T R
1 I
1 111 I 121
I L T R I L T R
1127 291 78 126 1516 128
112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0
101 0
I Southbound
I L T R
I
112 1
I L T R
1120 785 168
112.0 12.0 12.0
I 0
.0. Lanes
IfGConfig
Volume
lane Width
TOR Vol
luration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
IB Left A A A NB Left A
Thru A A Thru A
Right A A Right A
IB Peds Peds
Left A A SB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
lB Right A Right A A
Peds Peds
Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
Ireen 10.0 13.0 25.0 10.0 67.0
ellow 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0
Iycle Length: 135.0 sees
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
lane Group Flow Rate
rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
(astbound
304 1.17 0.356 146.3 F
. R 520 1848 0.77 0.281 51.5 D 96.1 F
&estbound
~ 241
T 345
. 293
.orthbound
L 279
I 1756
786
Southbound
.. 134
.. 2019 3539
R 903 1583
IL Intersection Delay
I
1863
1583
562
3539
1583
0.59
0.94
0.30
0.10
0.96
0.18
0.99
0.43
0.21
= 51. 4
0.259 44.3 D
0.185 86.6 F
0.185 48.0 D
0.496 18.2 B
0.496 45.8 D
0.496 18.9 B
69.7
E
43.3
D
0.570 113.5
0.570 16.7
0.570 14.2
(sec/veh)
F
B
B
Intersection
27.1
C
LOS
D
HCS: wnalized
linter: Belcher @ ne Coachman
Analyst: Lincks
,ate: 2/20/01
/W St: NE Coachman
Intersections ReltlJe 3.2
City/St: Pinellas Co.
proj #:
Period: PM Peak WITH PROJECT
N/S St: Belcher
I
I Eastbound
I L T R
I
I 110
I L TR
1317 351 19
112.0 12.0
I 0
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY
I Westbound I Northbound
I L T R I L T R
1 I
111 1 112 1
I L T R 1 L T R
1126 289 77 151 1576 127
112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0
I 0 I 0
1 Southbound
1 L T R
I
112 1
I L T R
1119 813 167
112.0 12.0 12.0
I 0
furation 0.25 Area Type: All other areas
Signal Operations
Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
fB Left A A A NB Left A
Thru A A Thru A
Right A A Right A
I.m Peds Peds
Left A A SB Left A A
Thru A Thru A A
lB Right A Right A A
Peds Peds
Right EB Right
SB Right WB Right
treen 10.0 13.0 25.0 10.0 67.0
ellow 4.0 0.0 4.0
All Red 1.0 0.0 1.0
fYCle Length: 135.0 secs
Intersection Performance Summary
Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach
~ane Group Flow Rate
rp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS
~astbound
304 1.16 0.356 141. 5 F
TR 520 1848 0.79 0.281 52.9 D 93.8 F
Iwestbound
L 234
T 345
IR 293
Northbound
L 267
IT 1 7 5 6
R 786
Southbound
IL 134 0.99
T 2019 3539 0.45
R 903 1583 0.21
1-------- Inte::ecti:=-~:laY_~54.7
to. Lanes
GConfig
Volume
a.ane Width
~TOR Vol
1863
1583
537
3539
1583
I
0.60
0.93
0.29
0.21
1. 00
0.18
0.259 44.9 D
0.185 85.3 F
0.185 48.0 D
0.496 19.6 B
0.496 54.7 D
0.496 18.9 B
69.1 E
51.1 D
0.570 139.6 F
0.570 16.9 B 29.7 C
0.570 14.2 B
(sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D
e
e
CDB Meeting Date: March 20, 2001
Case Number: FL 01-01-04
Agenda Item: C2
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
L.M. Loken
LOCATION:
601 North Belcher Road
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (south) setback
along Sharkey Road from 25 feet to five feet, reduce the front
(west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce
the front (north) setback along Northeast Coachman Road from 25
feet to 15 feet, permit parking within the Institutional District and
to increase the area of a retail sales and service use from 10 percent
(1,433 square feet) to 18 percent (2,500 square feet) in the Office
District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan and parking analysis submitted by Walker & Associates
Architects P.A.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1.358 acres; 59,154 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: Approximately 262 feet of width by 300 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Vacant
Office (plus 18 percent retail sales and service)
PLAN CATEGORY:
RlOG, Residential Office/General Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
0, Office District
Page 1
e
e
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached Dwellings
West: Retail Sales and Service
East: School
South: Community Center/Single-family residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is dominated by residential and commercial
uses.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 1,358 acres located on the southeast comer of North Belcher Road and Northeast
Coachman Road. The lot has 160 feet of frontage on North Belcher Road (west), 230 feet of
frontage on Northeast Coachman Road (north) and 262 feet of frontage on Sharkey Road (south).
The site's east property line runs north from the southeast comer of the site for approximately
146 feet. The property line then runs northwest for approximately 168 feet and terminates at the
northeast comer of the site. The site is vacant with access available along Northeast Coachman
Road and Sharkey Road. The site is a comer lot and, due to its shape, has three front setbacks -
Northeast Coachman Road, Sharkey Road and North Belcher Road. The property has two side
setbacks that form the east side of the site (a northeast and east property line).
The site is located within a commercial area on North Belcher Road. Existing shopping centers
are located to the northwest and southwest. Offices and a social/community center (Masonic
Temple) are located to the south and a school is located to the east (Coachman Fundamental
Middle School). Farther to the east, south and north are single-family dwellings.
The uses within the proposed, two-story building include a 2,500 square foot of retail sales and
service bank and 11,830 square feet of office. The bank is included in the retail sales and service
definition of the Code. The bank will be located at the northeast comer of the building on the
first floor and will include three drive-though lanes on the east side of the building.
The Code limits the amount of retail sales and service use within the Office District to no more
than ten percent of the gross floor area (GFA) of the principal structure. The use of the principal
structure must be used for office purposes. An application meeting this criterion would be
otherwise reviewed as a Flexible Standard Development request. The applicant is requesting to
increase the amount of retail sales and service space that is permitted within the Office District
from 10 percent (1,433 square feet) to 18 percent (2,500 square feet). The requested increase in
retail sales and service area to 2,500 square feet reflects a typical size bank branch. The applicant
is aware that no additional retail sales and service uses will be permitted unless such approval is
resubmitted to the Community Development Board.
Page 2
e
e
The request includes three front setback reductions and one side setback reduction. Of these
requests, the side (east) and two front (Northeast Coachman Road and North Belcher Road)
setback reductions would, also otherwise be reviewed as a Flexible Standard development
application. The reductions in all setbacks are for parking or drive aisles only and the proposed
building will be setback a minimum of 67 feet from any property line. The only setback
reduction that, in and of itself, would require a Level Two, Flexible Development approval is the
front (south) setback reduction from 25 feet to five feet along Sharkey Road. Sharkey Road
consists of a 66-foot right-of-way with approximately 24 feet of pavement. Sharkey Road
terminates approximately 500 feet east of Belcher Road and this site. The proposed parking
spaces will be located five feet from that property line and approximately 40 feet from the edge
of pavement. The lot immediately to the south of the site (across Sharkey Road) is zoned Office
District and is vacant. The lot farther south is zoned Institutional District and is the location of
the Masonic Temple (social/community center).
The proposed building includes a modem, building fa<;ade, an off-white and green color scheme
with heavy use of green-tinted glass, brick panel insets and a flat roof. Staff recommends that a
sloped or mansard roof be substituted for the proposed flat roof in order to increase the level of
architectural detail and interest of the structure. The proposal also includes improving existing
access points from Northeast Coachman and Sharkey Roads. All property lines will be heavily
buffered with landscaping, including a tiered effect along all street frontages, providing a mix of
foliage texture and color and reducing the use of sod, which will exceed the intent and
requirements of Code. All proposed signage will meet Code requirements.
The requests are to reduce the required front setbacks along Sharkey Road (south) from 25 feet to
five feet, along North Belcher Road (west) from 25 feet to 15 feet and along Northeast
Coachman Road (north) from 25 feet to 15 feet, and a reduction in the side (northeast) setback
from 20 feet to ten feet. The request also includes an increase in the amount of retail sales and
service space that is permitted within the Office District in the proposed building from ten
percent (1,433 square feet) to 18 percent (2,500 square feet) for a proposed bank with three drive-
though lanes.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS
There are no code enforcement issues associated with this property.
Page 3
e
e
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD
IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT:
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
FLOOR AREA 0.5 Vacant 0.25 Yes
RATIO
IMPERVIOUS 0.75 Vacant 0.71 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO
B. FLEXIBILITY STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE 0, OFFICE DISTRICT:
INFILL
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 59,154 square 59,154 square Yes
minimum feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 262 feet 262 feet Yes
minimum
HEIGHT N/A Vacant 27 feet Yes
maximum
FRONT YARD N/A Vacant South (Sharkey Yes
SETBACK Road): five feet
minimum West (Belcher
Road): 15 feet
North (NE
Coachman
Road): 15 feet-
all to pavement
SIDE YARD N/A Vacant Northeast: 10 Yes
SETBACK feet - pavement
minimum East: 50 feet
REAR YARD N/A N/A N/A N/A**
SETBACK
minimum
** Comer lots have front and side setbacks but no rear setback requirement.
Page 4
e
e
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
PARKING Determined by Vacant 65 spaces Yes
SPACES the Community
minimum Development
Coordinator
based on the
specific use
and! or ITE
Manual
standards *
*
Staff has used three spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area of the office portion of
the building (35 parking spaces required) and five spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor
area for the retail sales and service portion of the building (13 parking spaces) or a total of
47 parking spaces as the ratio for required parking for the proposed 14,330 square foot
building. The parking provided exceeds this requirement.
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development
standards.
Due to the shape and location of the property, there are three front setbacks and two side
setbacks. A single side setback reduction (20 feet reduced to ten feet) is requested for
the purposes of locating a bypass lane associated with the drive-though lanes on the east
side of the building. Two of the front (west and north) setback reductions (25 feet
reduced to 15 feet) are for parking spaces only. The front (south) setback reduction (25
feet reduced to five feet) along Sharkey Road is also for parking only. Sharkey Road
consists of 66 feet of right-of-way with only 24 feet of pavement. The parking along the
south side of the property will be located approximately 40 feet from the edge of
pavement. The proposed landscape treatment will exceed the intent of Code with an
attractive tiered effect along all street frontages.
Page 5
e
e
The other portion of the request addresses the issue of increasing the amount of retail
sales and service use that may be established within the Office District. Retail sales and
service uses (including the proposed bank) are limited to no more than ten percent of
the gross floor area of a building used for office purposes. This site is located in a
transitional zone between more intense commercial activities west of Belcher Road and
more residential uses across Northeast Coachman Road to the north, east and south. It
should be noted that most of the residential uses are further separated from the site
streets, a school and a social/community center. Banks are typically a less intense use
than traditional retail sales and service establishment. The size of the retail sales and
service portion of the structure is as accessory to the principal, office use of the
building.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties.
The proposed development of the site should not materially reduce the fair market value
of abutting properties. The improvements proposed for this site will hopefully
encourage additional redevelopment and improvements of the area. The improvements
to the site include a new building with perimeter and interior landscaping in excess of
Code requirements to include a tiered effect along North Belcher and Northeast
Coachman Road. The current assessed value of the property is $450,000. After the
proposed improvements are made the value is expected to be $650,000.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The proposed use, an office with accessory retail sales and service, is a permitted use in
the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The surrounding uses are a mix of detached dwellings (primarily to the north, south and
east), commercial (primarily to the west) and assorted uses (school, church and
social/community center). This proposal will act as an appropriate transition between
the more intense commercial uses to the west and the more residential and less intense
non-residential uses to the east. The two-story building, as proposed, will be compatible
with neighboring sites which also contain two-story structures.
Page 6
e
e
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses with the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The property is uniquely located at the intersection of two significant arterial roads.
Office uses are a permitted use in the Office District. The applicant desires a site
centralized in Clearwater with frontage onto a major arterial with access from a
secondary street.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
The architecture of the building and site improvements, including landscaping in excess
of Code requirements, will enhance the property and the immediate vicinity. Extensive
landscaping along the perimeter and interior of the site will upgrade the site and
establish a new standard in the area. Building features include a modem, building
fa<;ade, an off-white and green color scheme with heavy use of green-tinted glass, brick
panel insets and a flat roof. Staff recommends that a mansard or other sloped roof be
substituted for the proposed flat roof to provide greater architectural detail. All signage
will meet Code requirements. The economic value of the site will increase with the
proposed enhancements and will compliment the neighborhood. Continued
reinvestment in properties will aid in the sustainability of the neighborhood.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
The investments made to this property will benefit the immediate neighborhood through
aesthetics, increased property values, and the potential to influence adjacent property
owners to further improve their properties.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed improvements to the site will result in increased property values and
enhanced community character. The applicant has shown that there will be adequate
parking provided to serve the uses. The proposal will be in keeping with the character of
the area. The improvements to this site might promote continued reinvestment in the
neighborhood.
Page 7
e
e
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The applicant has provided parking in excess of Code requirements.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The proposal includes a new, two-story office building on a vacant lot. The
development will be similar to and in harmony with the scale and character of existing
structures on adjacent properties of this commercial corridor.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate.
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned Office District and located in a commercially developed area along
Belcher Road. The proposed use will be in compliance with that zoning. The site will
be heavily buffered along all street frontages with landscaping which will exceed the
intent of Code. The proposed bank will be a minor part of the proposed development
and is similar to other retail sales and service uses in the area. The proposed
development should not discourage appropriate development and use of adjacent land
buildings.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The bank use within the office building will not adversely affect the health or safety or
persons residing or working in the neighborhood ofthe proposed use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Access to the site is provided via one driveway on both Sharkey Road and Northeast
Coachman Road. The access from Northeast Coachman Road will be right-inlright-out
only. Both driveways are approximately 150 feet from Belcher Road which will reduce
congestion at the intersection.
Page 8
e
e
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the established commercial character of
the immediate vicinity. It is compatible with the adjacent residential uses as well. The
building is two stories and is setback between 67 to 84 feet from all property line. The
site will be well buffered along all properties line.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent
properties.
The hours of operation of the bank and offices are usual and customary for these uses.
They will be between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The drive-
though lanes will be buffered from neighboring sites by extensive landscaping.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on February 15, 2001. The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible
Development approval, with the maximum development potential, requirements of
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects, and with all applicable standards of the
Community Development Code,
The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to
reduce the front (south) setback along Sharkey Road from 25 feet to five feet, reduce the front
(west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the front (north) setback along
Northeast Coachman Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to
10 feet and to increase the square footage of retail sales and service from 10 percent (1,433
square feet) to 18 percent (2,500 square feet) of the gross floor area (GF A) of a 14,330 square
foot office building in the Office District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project at 601 North Belcher Road, subject to the following two conditions:
1) That the architecture of the building be revised to include a sloped roof or other, similar
architectural features; and
2) That all signage meets Code.
Page 9
e
Prepared by: Mark T. Parry, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
Traffic Study
e
rI---
------------;
.//
./
~--~
S:IP/anning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlPending ApplicationslBe/cher N 601 United Bank and TrustlBe/cher N 601 STAFF
REPORT. doc
Page 10
~
'-'.1..1..1. ~ .J:' '--' L.I!J1-l..l\. V V .fl. ~ ..l!i.K
P9ANNING & DEVELOWENT SERVICES
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SO~YRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
APPLICA TION REQUIREMENTS
(other than single-family dwellings and accessory uses)
(,01 t{ ~g.(c.har _ c...DB5C/~"":SS/u1
All applications for development must be accompanied by the information as required
below. Only complete applications will be accepted.
Number of applications, site plans and elevation drawings required:
. Standard Development: Three (3) copies
· Flexible Standard Development or Flexible Development (for review by the Development
Review Committee): Thirteen (13) copies please make sure they are collated/stapled and
/,ded
__/ APPLlCA TION FEE(S};
//
/.
/
/
CRITERIA as provided within the Code for all applicable applications (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Use, Residentia/lnfill Project use, reductions in setbacks, parking, etc.);
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 ~ X 11);
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 ~ X 11) (color rendering if possible);
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 ~ X 11)
(black and white and color rendering, if possible);
-- REDUCED SIGNAGE PACKAGE (8 ~ X 11) (color);
/ AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION (if submitted by an agent);
/'
/
/
-----
7.
---;7
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property);
COPY OF PLAT, as applicable;
PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY (title, deed);
NAMES OF ALL PERSONS WITH CONTRACTUAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY;
/
/'
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings - include height dimensions, colors and
materials;
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, as required;
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow, bar scale, and date prepared (Minimum 1: 50' engineering scale);
Page 1 of 2
1M
_ ..------- ..--.._ ..._.____ '1' ,...,....v.'u~'"',
The footprint and size. buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
--- Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights of way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines,
. manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines;
/ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
7.. Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
~ Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 O'x12' clear space);
7 Location of all landscape material;
~/ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
-2.. Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
./ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;
/
7
~
~/
/'
-7
~.
~
~
-1/
7
/
/
/
-.J
"7
,/
---;;7
-;;/
-/
~/
"7
.
SITE DATA: for existing and proposed development, in written form-
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and as a
percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Height and type of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Impermeable surface ratio;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25" of the adjacent site, by species, size(DBH 4"
or greater), and location, including drip lines.)
LANDSCAPE PLAN (see Community Development Code for requirements); include Comprehensive
Landscape Program application, as applicable;
JRRIGA TION PLAN;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
SIGNAGE, include Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate $300 fee required);
OTHER:
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting the size, canopy
(Drip lines) and condition of such trees.
s: application forms/development review/supplemental information - applications other than single family. doc 10/6/00
Page 2 of 2
.
.
CHECKLIST FOR STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
Name: United Bank and Trust Company
Address: 6~erROad
File Number: FL -01-04
Proposed Use: Office with 18% of GF A as Retail Sales and Service (bank)
Zoning District: 0, Office District
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED REQlliRED O.K. NOT
O.K.
PLANNER: MTP
1. PERMITTED USE Retail sales and service - Retail sales and service Not OK
18% -10%
2. COUNTY WIDE
PLAN
DENSITY: N/A N/A N/A
FLOOR AREA 0.25 0.50 OK
ISR 0.71 0.75 OK
3. DISTIRCT
MINIMUM
STANDARDS
LOT SIZE 59,154 square feet 10,000 square feet OK
FLAG LOT (3-105) N/A N/A N/A
LOT WIDTH 159 feet 100 feet OK
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 27 feet 30 feet OK
FRONT SETBACK South - 5 feet 25 feet NOT OK
West - 15 feet
North - 15 feet
SIDE SETBACK NE - 10 feet 20 feet OK - east Not OK -
East - 40 feet NE
REAR SETBACK Comer Lot Comer Lot Comer Lot
# OF PARKING 65 spaces 43 spaces OK
SPACES
4. SETBACKS:
# OF FRONT YARDS Three N/A N/A
CCC LINE N/A N/A N/A
ENCROACHMENTS N/A N/A N/A
SCENIC N/A N/A N/A
BUILDING N/A N/A N/A
.
.
PROPOSED REQUIRED O.K. NOT
O.K.
PLANNER CONT.
5. PARKING
# OF SPACES 65 spaces 43 spaces OK
SHARED PARKING # N/A N/A OK
PROTECTED TREES N/A N/A N/A
ANGLE OK OK OK
WIDTH OK OK OK
LENGTH OK OK OK
# HANDICAPPED 3 spaces 3 spaces OK
LENGTH OK OK OK
WIDTH OK OK OK
AISLE OK OK OK
PARKING LOTS N/A N/A N/A
# ENTRANCES 2 2 OK
SURFACE N/A N/A N/A
WITHIN 600 FT N/A N/A N/A
STRIPING OK OK OK
COMPREHENSIVE N/A N/A N/A
PRGM
LOADING N/A N/A N/A
WIDTH N/A N/A N/A
LENGTH N/A N/A N/A
# SPACES N/A N/A N/A
DRIVE - THROUGHS N/A N/A OK
STACKING SPACES N/A N/A OK
6. CERTIFICATE OF
CONCURRENCY
APPROVED? N/A N/A N/A
UNITY OF TITLE N/A N/A N/A
REQUIRED?
OUTDOOR N/A N/A N/A
LIGHTING
TYPE::CUTOFF? N/A N/A N/A
LOCATION N/A N/A N/A
HEIGHT N/A N/A N/A
7. DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD
APPROVED? N/A N/A N/A
8. FLAG LOT
FLAG LOT DRIVE N/A N/A N/A
SEPERA TION
DRIVEWAY WIDTH N/A N/A N/A
# OF LOTS PER N/A N/A N/A
DRIVE
.
.
PROPOSED REQUIRED O.K. NOT
O.K.
9. ACCESSORY USE
STANDARDS
PRICIPLE USE N/A N/A N/A
EST'D?
SIZE OF PRINCIPLE N/A N/A N/A
USE
SIZE OF ACCESSORY N/A N/A N/A
USE
SIZE OF EXISTING N/A N/A N/A
ACCESSORY USE
10. OUTDOOR CAFE
GREATER THAN 25% N/A N/A N/A
TOTAL FLOOR N/A N/A N/A
AREA
LOCATED IN N/A N/A N/A
SETBACK?
AMPLIFIED MUSIC? N/A N/A N/A
HOURS OF N/A N/A N/A
OPERATION?
11. DOCKS
HARBORMASTER N/A N/A N/A
APP'D?
DEVIATIONS APP'D N/A N/A N/A
BY
HARBORMASTER
SETBACK N/A N/A N/A
LENGTH N/A N/A N/A
WIDTH N/A N/A N/A
TIE POLES N/A N/A N/A
BOA TLIFT SETBACK N/A N/A N/A
# OF SLIPS 60 N/A OK
SEAWALL N/A N/A N/A
ELEVEA nON
LANDSCAPING:
1. PERIMETER
REQUIREMENTS
# OF TREES
SIZE
# OF SPECIES
GRADE
# OF SHRUBS
SIZE
GRADE
.
.
PROPOSED REQUIRED O.K. NOT
O.K.
2. INTERIOR
REQUIREMENTS
FOUNDATION
PLANTING
SQUARE FEET
# OF TREES
SIZE
# OF SPECIES
GRADE
# OF SHRUBS
SIZE
GRADE
GROUND COVER
LANDSCAPING
CONT.
3. SCENIC
CORRIDOR
4. IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
5. TREE REMOVAL
PERMIT
APPROVED?
6. CLEARING
PERMIT
FIRE MARSHALL
1. FIRE LANE
2. EMERGENCY
ACCESS
TRAFFIC ENG
1. ACCESS
CLASSIFICATION
DRIVEWAY
SPACING
MEDIAN SPACING
REDUCED BY
DIRECTOR?
SIGHT VISIBILITY
TRIANGLE
.
.
PROPOSED REQUIRED O.K. NOT
O.K.
2. JOINT & CROSS
ACCESS
EASEMENT?
RECORDED
EASEMENT
SUBMITTED?
3. TRAFFIC STUDY
APPROVED?
4. OUTP ARCEL
ACCESS
STANDARDS
# OF OUTP ARCELS
PROPOSED?
CIVIL ENG
1. EROSION
CONTROL
APPROVED?
2.STORMWATER
DETENTION
3. SIDEWALK
4. DRIVEWAY
SOLID WASTE
1. MECHANICAL
SCREENING
SCREENED ON 4
SIDES
SIZE OK
PARKING SPACE
REUCTION?
LOCATION
.
Text for surrounding land use maps
for CDB cases
Revised 1/12/01
Use correct spelling
Do not abbreviate
Choose from the following land use
terms:
o Community residential home
o Adult use
o Airport
o Assisted living facility
o Auto service station
o Cemeteries
o Congregate care
o Convention center
o Educational facility (e.g. junior
college, technical school)
o Governmental use
o Halfway house
o Hospital
o Indoor recreation/entertainment
o Light assembly
o Manufacturing
o Marina
o Medical clinic
o Mobile home park
o Multi-family residential
o Nightclub
o Nursing home
o Office
o Open space
o Outdoor recreation/entertainment
o Overnight accommodation
o Park
o Parking garage
o Parking lot
-fJi Place of worship
o Problematic use
\\MS2\PDSlPlanning Departmenf\C D Bvnaps\Textfor
surrounding land use maps for CDB cases. doc
.
o Public transportation facility
o Research/technology use
o Residential shelter
\0. Restaurant
...ew Retail
o RV park
.0/ Salvage yard
A School
o Self storage
"Q' Single-family residential
~Social/community center
o Social/public service agency
o Telecommunications tower
o TV!radio studio
o Utility/infrastructure facility
o Vehicle sale/display
o Vehicle service
o Veterinary office
o Wholesale/warehouse
'-'.I. r.i- V.J:' '--' .I..J..I!J.tl..ft. l'l' fl. 1. J!i..K.
liLANNING & DEVELQM1ENT SERVICES
.~ICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 S~H MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
APPLICATION REQUIREl\1ENTS
(other than siugle-famiI~elIingS and accessory uses)
bOt N. J5efr:l1rLr
All applications for development must be accompanied by the information as required
below. Only complete applications will be accepted.
Number of applications, site plans and elevation drawings required:
. Standard Development: Three (3) copies
. Flexible Standard Development or Flexible Development (for review by the Development
Review Committee): Thirteen (13) copies please make sure they are collated/stapled and
'f>lded
/ APPLICATION FEE(S); Iz.c9 S
/'
CRITERIA as provided within the Code for all applicable applications (~mprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Use, Residentiallnfill Project use, reductions in setbacks, parking, etc.); ~ G Q,./I. Q.I'I. -
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 112 X 11);
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 112 X 11) (color rendering if possible);
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8112 X 11)
(black and white and color rendering, if possible);
/
7
REDUCED SIGNAGE PACKAGE (8112 X 11) (color);
AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION (if submitted by an agent); I r)''';y {......, r -I- I Z c",f:t,/
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property);
--'
COPY OF PLAT, as applicable;
~. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY (title, deed);
/ / NAMES OF ALL PERSONS WITH CONTRACTUAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY;
-/
/
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings - include height dimensions, colors and
materials;
../
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, as required;
--'
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
/
7"
7
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow, bar scale, and date prepared (Minimum 1: 50' engineering scale);
Page 1 of 2
w
/
( ~
, /
=?
-?
T
~
7;
T
-
/
/
-
/'
7/
-;;7"
/
~....
-7'
/
,...---
f
/
-;./
/'
----7.
-+-
-;7
~
~
..-.-._.- ..--__ ..._.__....._ III ,............,I''"''~'"'I
~
The footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;.
All existing and propo points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights of way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines,
manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks;
.
SITE DATA: for existing and proposed development, in written farm-
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and as a
percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Height and type of all outdoor lighting fixtures;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Impermeable surface ratio;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25" of the adjacent site, by species, size(DBH 4"
or greater), and location, including drip lines,)
LANDSCAPE PLAN (see Community Development Code for requirements); include Comprehensive
Landscape Program application, as applicable;
IRRIGATION PLAN;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
SIGNAGE, include Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate $300 fee required);
OTHER: ..Arrf/CAh-vl' I drj;lM( -I- I Z c,ofJ:(lJ
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE: I. '3f?-..c..
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting the size, canopy
(Drip lines) and condition of such trees.
s: application forms/development review/supplemental information - applications other than single family. doc 10/6/00
Page 2 of 2
WALKER & ASSOCIATES ~HITECTS PA
701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAS~ITE 701
SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695
PHONE (727) 726-4766
FAX (727) 726-4767
OJE1T. CIDrF' 1TOO~~~(UJ01T1T~[b
DATI
I '2.3IDI
Joe NO
."I.NTIOH
..~
TO I^A.'Q~ PE..QV1'-'
PLi\WN\l-.I.C, <9 a=:_uEloP/^~~-r SE{2UIC.e: 5
\ ~ <Sl'XJTll N\. '(QI'l E: MJ~
GENTlEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover vIa
o Shop draWings
o Copy of letter
o Prints
o Change order
o Plans
o
o Samples
the following items:
o Specifications
COPIES OAT[ NO. DESCRIPTION
\'3 -Af/p L\CA'\104 V'h.C~h.<9t .- \ - C;>'Qu.I~AL - \~ COPh~S
\3 'D~W 1 H.G r-='~ c.Y- ~c..~ - A QC\~ ~C\ ?\ '\E (:It.l.~ - 'E\.~VA."\\04 <;
CQf.::>\14. ~c,.,! ~ ~ b..k ~f>E ~lb..,\4.
\ cu..e:a - ,\ 205.00
\~ <3 UVlu~Y - \ c:>nG\L.I~L - \~ CO~\e.S
--..- --
--
I
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
0 For approval 0 Approved as submitted
(J For your use 0 Approved as noted
0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections
0 For review and comment 0
0 FOR 81DS DUE 19
o Resubmit_copies for approval
o Submit _copies for distribution
[J Return_corrected prints
o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS ~ ,B>/Al1T^-l rDQ 'DtlC
"'T\'2I'::>\-"F\C. \N\{7f.,.C:1' c:;.'l/\?Y IUlll f='OLLa..u
cf~ ~ DEVELOP1~fENT SVCS
FIle-~=----_.
r"[. q-f - &l:-O"I
SIGNED:
~~
COpy TO
" ."cIOlur.. .,. not .. nofed, lI.nd', noll'r UI .r once
.
.
Prepared by and return to:
Jack R. St. Arnold, Esquire
St. Arnold & Stearns, Chartered
1370 Pinehurst Road
Dunedin, FL 34698
TRUSTEE'S WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE, executed this 24.fA day of July, 2000, between HOWARD LEE
McCAULEY and SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Trustees of THE McCAULEY CHARITABLE
TRUST under the Declaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995, with full power and authority
to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber or otherwise manage and dispose of said property
pursuant to Florida Statute 689.071, GRANTOR, and LUVERNE M. LOKEN as Trustee of THE
LUVERNE M. LOKEN AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT
dated May 12, 1994, as GRANTEE, whose address is: Zr;IlSitlt tat!' tM08 F3;{&(]/r. second
party: 33'750
Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include singular and plural,
heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of
corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires.
4}
WITNESSETH, that the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10,00)
Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by the said
Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and
quitclaim unto the said Grantee forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the
said Grantor has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and
being in the County of PineHas, State of Florida, to wit:
See Exhibit "A"
Subject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record,
and taxes for the year 2000 and subsequent years,
Parcel No. 07/29/16/00000/302/0310
and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
The Grantor further warrants that the above described property does not now and
never has constituted Grantor's homestead, and is not now and never has been
contiguous to Grantor's homestead.
~ !
1
.
J
.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances
thereunto belonging to or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien,
equity and claim whatsoever of the said Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use,
benefit and behoof of the said Grantee forever.
THIS DEED is executed pursuant to and in the exercise of the power and authority
granted to and vested in said Trustee by the terms of said deed or deeds in trust delivered to
said Trustee in pursuance of the Trust Agreement above mentioned. This deed is made
subject to the lien of every trust deed or mortgage (if there be any) of record in said county
given to secure the payment of money, remaining unreleased at the date of the delivery hereof,
and covenants, conditions, restrictions, and easements of record.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has signed and sealed these presents
the day and year first above written.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the presence of:
~r. ~
Si9~~. ~~
P;~~Ud~
P:lgn~ =
~.p~int: .. /,4H1 t4>UJ:?~
"
THE McCAULEY CHARITABLE TRUST
~?~
.J:' Print(%j-A/L, ,/ ~;lue4
/~~~~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~41A day of July,
2000, by HOWARD LEE McCAULEY and SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Directors under the
Declaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995, who is personally known to me or who have
produced fL 1>t-,I!~rs It ~~ S as identification and who did take an oath, and
acknowledged to and before me that they have executed the foregoing instrument for the
purposes therein expressed. /\
N r ARY PUBLIC:
,
xL f<t1
SHIRLEE L. McCAULEY, as Di /ctor under
eclaration of Trust dated November 20, 1995
............ JESSICA L KElSEY
,~~
f...., t'A~A MY COMMISSION. CC 898200
~'~lf EXPIRES: March 26, 2004
"';f.P.r;,~..' Bonded llvu NotaIy Public Undelwrit9rs
]"
ob
2
.
.
tXHfBfT "A"
Comincnce at the SoutheJsc comer of lhe NOrthwest W or lbe Sculhwar " of
Section? Township 29 South,lW2ge 16 East. and niD NotthOCOJ2'32- &sf.
33.07 (~t to I point On the Northerly right~(-MY of Count)' Road 289 (Sharkey
Road) run theuce North 89038'49- West Ilol1J aaJd Northerly ri&ht~f..WJY line
99j.26 f=t for I Point ofBeainning; run the~.North 19038'49- West c.oarinu-
in, Ilona said Nortberly rl&ht~t-W21liDe 262.16 feet 10 I polnf 0Il1he Easterly
riJht-of-Yily liDe of Belcher Road; run thence N~ 00 eo 1 '19- East aJoaa the
easterly ri,ht-ol-way JiDe 159. 19 (~t to I point 011 d2e Southerly ripr-ot-way.of
Notthe2st ~m!ln Road (Couaty Road No.2); ~ lUQ North .530.5323.
East alollJ uJd Southerly riJ!1t-()(-way line 230.00 1=; run rh~ South .
27000'16- East 168.49 feet, run South 00005'16- West 146.23 feet to Ihe Polat
or Beginning.
~
'I'~
.j q)""
THE 800 PROE
CENTER 88
I
I
\.
!'
i
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OWNER: L
SITE: roC) (
~~40, fa-
e
--
Item #C2 - 601 N. Belcher Road: Luverne M, Loken, TRE/ United Bank & Trust
Company - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to reduce
south front setback along Sharkey Road from 25 feet to 5 feet, reduce west front
setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 1 5 feet, reduce north front setback
along NE Coachman Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, permit parking within
Institutional District, and increase area of a retail sales and service use from 10%
(1,433 square feet) to 18% (2,500 square feet) in the Office District, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at Sec. 07-29-16, M&B 32.031.
FL 01-01-04
ACTION - APPROVED - 4:2 With conditions: 1) building architecture be revised to
include a sloped roof or similar architectural features and 2) all signage to meet
Code.
Item #C3 - 1100 S. Missouri Avenue: The Clearwater Group, Ltd. - Owner/
Applicant. Request amendment to previously approved Certified Site Plan (Sunshine
Mall) to authorize a change of use for undeveloped parcels from commercial to
multi-family, totaling 155 units and 15,602 square-feet of existing commercial use
at Sec. 15-29-15, M&B 34.01 and Sec. 22-29-15, M&B's 21.12 & 21.13.
FL 01-01-05
ACTION - APPROVED - 5:0 With conditions: 1) final design of buildings to be
consistent with conceptual elevations submitted or as modified by the CDB; 2) site
density be limited to 156 dwellings units and 15,602 square feet of non-residential
uses or be based on a conversion rate as outlined in the staff report; and 3) all
signage comply with Code,
Item #C4 - 2394 Gulf-to-Bav Boulevard: Davton Andrews, Inc. - Owner/Applicant.
Request Flexible Development approval to permit vehicle sales/display in the
Commercial District: 1) reduce lot area from 40,000 square-feet to 32,929 square-
feet; 2) reduce lot width from 200 feet to 100 feet; 3) permit vehicle display within
front setbacks along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard & Fernwood Avenue; 4) permit vehicle
sales/display on lot contiguous to property designated as residential in zoning atlas;
5) permit vehicle sales/display on lot with less than 7,000 square-feet of enclosed
building; 6) permit vehicle sales/display outside an enclosed building; 7) reduce
required parking spaces from 77 spaces to 5 spaces; 7) permit reduction in
landscape buffer from 15 feet to 7,5 feet on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard; and 8) permit a
reduction in landscape buffer from 15 feet to zero feet on Fernwood Avenue as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 24.07.
FL 01-01-03
ACTION - CONTINUED TO APRIL 17, 2001 - 6:0
acd030 1
2
03/20/01
e
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
March 20,2001, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
1. (cont. from 02/20/01) Thanh Phuoc & Kimtruc Thi N2uven are requesting a flexible development approval
of a nightclub within the Commercial District, with a redeuction in the required number of parking spaces from
20 spaces to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape
Program at 3006 Gulf-to-Bav Blvd., Bay View City Sub, Elk 8, Lots 8, 9, 10 & 1/2 of vac alley on N less Rd.
right-of-way on S. FL 00-08-33
2. Ernest H. McDowell is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the rear setback from 25 ft to 5
ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project at 42 Midwav Islands, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 3, Lot 8. FL
01-01-02
3. Luverne M. Loken, TRE (United Bank and Trust Company) are requesting a flexible development approval
to reduce the front (south) setback along Sharkey Rd. from 25 ft to 5 ft, reduce the front (west) setback along
Belcher Rd. from 25 ft to 15 ft, reduce the front (north) setback along Northeast Coachman Rd. from 25 ft to 15
ft, permit parking within the Institutional District and to increase the area of a retail sales and service use from
10% (1.433 sq ft) to 18 % (2,500 sq ft) in the Office District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project at 601 N. Belcher Rd., Sec. 07-29-16, M&B 32.031. FL 01-01-04
4. Clearwater Retail Group are requesting an amendment to a previouslly approved Certified Site Plan
(Sunshine Mall) that authorizes a change of use for undeveloped parcels (from commercial to multi-family)
totalling 155 unit apartment complex and 15,602 sq ft of existing commercial use at 1100 S. Missouri Ave., Sec.
15-29-15, M&B 34.01 and Sec. 22-29-15, M&B's 21.12 & 21.13. FL 01-01-05
5. Davton Andrews, Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit vehicle sales and display in
the Commercial District with the following requests as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project: 1)
To reduce the lot area from 40,000 sq ft to 32,929 sq ft; 2) To reduce the lot width from 200 ft to 100 ft; 3) To
permit vehicle display within the required front setbacks along Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Fernwood Ave. (Flexible
Standard Development criteria - Section 2-704 T3); 4) To permit vehicle sales and display on a lot contiguous to
property designated as residential in the zoning atlas; 5) To permit vehicle sales and display on a lot with less
than 7,000 sq ft of enclosed building (Flexible Standard Development criteria - Section 2-703 Tl); 6) To permit
vehicle sales and display outside of an enclosed building (Flexible Development criteria - Section 2.704 R3); 7)
To reduce in required parking spaces from 77 spaces (2.5 spaces/lOOO sq ft of land area) to 4 spaces; 8) To
permit a reduction in landscape buffer from 15 ft to 7.5 ft on Gulf to Bay Blvd; and 9) To permit a reduction in
landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft on Fernwood Ave. at 2394 Gulf to Bav Blvd., Sec. 18-29-16, M&B
24.07. FL 01-01-03
6. Bav View Hotel, Inc. (Fred & Vivian Whalen) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit
direct access onto an arterial road (Edgewater Dr.) with a reduction in front setback along Edgewater Dr. from
25 ft to 10 ft. and reduction in north and east side setbacks from 10 ft to 5 ft, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at 1919 Ed2ewater Dr., Sunset Point and
Replat, Lot 2 & 3 less Rd & Blk A, part of Lot 5. FL 00-12-63
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by
the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for
such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
e
e
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for
review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater,
Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN
500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY
PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODA nON IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN TillS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR
REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 03/03/01
4).-' All p~rking must meet city standae 2 percent maximum slope for HC spaces; e
5) Parcel 3 - unclear what is proposea;
6) Parcel 5 - what is proposed?
7) Solid waste issues not addressed;
8) Outparcels have had major erosion - need to be stabilized - asphalt, riverrock or sod needed - has been a
problem for many months; make this a condition in staff report;
9) No tree issues;
10) Need plat for overall site with this site plan - need to add PLT number and need additional fee (all owners must
be a party to the application);
11) Need utility easements for entire site;
12) Need as -builts for utilities;
13) Need dimensions, colors, materials, and directions for elevations;
14) Recreation land and recreation facility impact fees due for additional units; rec land fee due to parks and rec
dept. prior to development approval- rec. facility fees due prior to issuance of building permits;
14) 15 sets of revised site plans including signed/sealed surveys are required by February 20, 2001 in order to be
scheduled for review by the CDB at its March 20,2001 meeting.
12:00 p.m.
Case: FL 01-01-04 - 601 N. Belcher Road
Owner: L.M. Loken.
Applicant: United Bank and Trust Company.
Location: 1.358 acres located on the southeast comer of N. Belcher Road and Northeast
Coachman Road.
Atlas Page: 281A
Zoning: 0, Office District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (south) setback along Sharkey Road
from 25 feet to five feet, reduce the front (west) setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15
feet, reduce the front (north) setback along Northeast Coachman Road from 25 feet to 15 feet,
reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet and to increase the square footage of retail
sales and service from 10% (1,433 square feet) to 18% (2,500 square feet) of the gross floor area
(GFA) of a 14,330 square foot office building in the Office District as part of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project
Proposed Use: 14,330 square foot, two-story office building with a 2,500 square foot retail sales
and service establishment (bank).
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following connnents:
1) Certified site plan expired from old code - now need to use new code;
2) Move sidewalk farther south into sharkey road right of way and add more landscaping, stop sidewalk at sharkey
road curb cut (not farther east);
3) Need to improve sharkey road with 30 feet of pavement (back to back of curb) as part of this proposal centered
in right-of-way;
4) Need FDOT driveway connection permit prior to building permit on NE Coachman;
5) Limit to right-in/right-out on NE Coachman
6) Transportation impact fee due prior to C/O;
7) All parking must meet city standards, access aisles and handicap included;
8) Need additonal pavement marking at drivethru lanes;
9) Revise outfall structure to avoid removal of trees along Sharkey Road (move to the west);
10) Move dumpster enclosure to be accessible - move farther east;
11) Architectural site plan does not match the survey along Belcher Road - need to be consistent;
12) Need to know what happens with stormsystem on Sharkey Road;
13) Don to check sewer;
14) Revise landscaping to create tiered effect on all road frontages; eliminate sod;
15) Show 15 feet oflandscaping on Sharkey Road
16) Show naturalized landscaping around detention basin;
17) Signage to meet Code
18) Revise elevations to include sloped roof; dimensions, colored elevations;
DRC action agenda - 02/15/01 - Page 2
19t Provide pedestrian acess from par.ot to belcher and northeast coachman e
20) IS sets of revised site plans inclu. signed/sealed surveys are required by February 20,2001 in order to be
scheduled for review by the CDB at its March 20,2001 meeting.
2:10 p.m.
Case: FLS 01-01-01 - 401 East Shore Drive
Owner/Applicant: Joseph Pijanowski
Location: 0.24 acres located on the northeast comer of Pier 60 Drive and East Shore Drive.
Atlas Page: 267 A
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for two paras ail boats as an accessory use to an
existing motel.
Proposed Use: A parasail boat business with two boats.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
I) ok for parasail company to pick up hotel patrons to take off site;
2) ok to use one of the existing boats to use for parasailing;;
3) need to add comments from previous development order here;
4) That no required parking spaces be displaced;
5) That no maintenance or repair of boats be permitted on site;
6) That storage and dispensing of fuel meet the requirements of the Harbor Master, Fire Department and other
applicable officials;
7) That no additional signage be permitted on site;
8) That the hours of operation be limited to 9:00 a.ill. to Y2 hour after sunset, seven days per week (consistent with
the jet ski rental business); and
9) That proof of insurance liability be provided prior to the issuance of an occupational license.
2:30 p.m.
Case: FLS 01-01-02 - 1450 Palmetto Street
Owner/Applicant: John Ramirez
Location: 0.298 acres located on the north side of Palmetto Street, approximately 50 feet west of
Palm Terrace Drive.
Atlas Page: 270A.
Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Standard approval to reduce the rear setback from IS feet to 9 feet for 494
square foot addition.
Proposed Use: A 494 square foot bedroom addition.
Presenter: Arden Dittmer, Development Review Specialist.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
I) need permit for palm tree removal;
2) reduction in setback results in efficient house layout;
3) access for construction - need to clarify - need to use neighbors property? Don't want to negatively impact
trees. Use east side of site - potentially remove wing wall and do not reconstruct in easement;
4) at northeast comer there is a grate inlet, do not drive over it - protect during construction with flag or barricade;
5) may need to elevate limbs on laurel oak at the northeast comer of site;
DRC action agenda - 02/15/01 - Page 3
. -',," -'~~....
\
.
.
F'-~
i
!
N
/
/
/
/
/
/;Q
/~o
/;~
4,;/",\1-
. ,.",. C q)
.,';}.... ~ ~
'yc. 0 /'\l~tS>
C ~A~
/ So{..:~~~
/.. ,<3'
t /~. ~
/~t'
- ~~f.
~
" an8'4!J" . (D)
" 8!T34'24" . ef)
P95.2$" CD). (f)
SHARKEY ROAD
66' RtA'fliiJ.fr-'#~XiP)
SITE RENDERING
United Bank
Clearwater, Florida
WAlKER and ASSOCIATES
Clearwater, Aorida
DATE:
DESIGN:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
REVISION:
FILE:
2/16/01
CMBA
CMBA
CMBA
PROJECT NUMBER:
WLKR0002
.--
DAVID EVANS
AND ASSOCIATES, ......
4025 Tampa Road. Suite 1203
Oldsmar, Flor;da 34677
Ph: (813) 814-1884 Fax: (813) 814-9884
SCALE: 1" = 50'
WA02CLSDS SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
\
\J
~
J"j 'F.- --.. .-i........
J. Le: ... .._,
~-r-..II ! ~ , _== ~
::j
m
c
Ul
I ,..
\- ~
i
.' 0
.
..
[~:
'z
-.Ii
'....
,15
'Z
m
>
en
....
m
r
m
<
>
~6
z
I
l:lL~
L,
I I
f---I---~
i I
rim
11--
1-1
:-i--
I i
-::
.:
;,~
1\)1
PROPOSED OFFICE AND BANK BUILDING FOR UNITED BANK ~~~ WALKER &. ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.A.
NORTHEAST COACHMAN AND BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 70~ Enterprise Rood East. Suite 302. Sofety Harbor. floridc J4695 (nn 726~o\766
'"""'~
.
.
--
N
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/;Q
/~o
/;~
./ ~
- (;~C '" ~)
B.. t- ~~
W c/ 0 /'\l~tP
.C ~A~
/~So(.JI~~~\.
/ t- ,<1'
t /~~t
1.0'
N B9"J8'49". (D)
N 89'34'2..-. (f)
i9$.2S'{D).(n
"
----V '------sl
~ ~I
_If'.... _;
. .__._-G--~~{l
~IS
~/~
~:
;l::f
SHARKEY ROAD
66' RrslHffiJ~XlP)
.--
DAVID EVANS
AND ASSOCIATES, ....
4025 Tampa Road. Suite 1203
Oldsmar, Florida 34677
Ph: (813) 814-1884 Fax: (813) 814-9884
SITE RENDERING
United Bank
Clearwater, Florida
WALKER and ASSOCIAlES
Clearwater, Rorida
WA02CLSDS SHEET NO. 1 OF 1
PROJECT NUMBER:
WLKR0002
2/16/01
CMBA
CMBA
CMBA
DATE:
DESIGN:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
REVISION:
FILE:
SCALE: 1" = 50'
I
.
"
~
i'fl
,
~
P
\' i
m 0
, :i!
c
J
.....
;5
'z
~. "I
~ ....
I, :r
m
_ In
I" <
~~
"
;~
~
1\);
PROPOSED OFFICE AND BANK BUILDING FOR UNITED BANK \\\\\;:\
\::)\.}\.} WALKER &. ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.A.
701 Enterprise Road East. Suite 302. Sorely tlarbor, Florida 34695 (n7) 726 4766
c
z
~
m
c
Ui
>
z
~
NORTHEAST COACHMAN AND BELCHER ROAD
1-
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
I "
1//
"Y
/ I :u=~
I
I I
III I
~ I
I
I
.
/
/
.
I lltau...-*,,- .....
/
"
/
~/
cP~
~:I'/
//
"
/
-Qf =--
-..-
I
L___-=-:==-_______~
61-1AfOKE'Y !<lOAD ~
( ~,~~ g
-~
ItB:1' NJIX
8tI!ET 1 ARCItIITEC1URAL lITE PLAN
ItEET 2 _'II_Ii!LSYA11ON8
..,.. LAND8CAPE AND DRMI~
LOCATION MAP
...
~~.~~~"1J~~1~ lN11:fQI~ LA'O&cAPE AREA
11IIIII FEI'lIME"TE1'l LANDeCAFE Af'lEA
SITE DATA
SITE Af'lEA -- - -1-'&8 ACp;ee (591&4 eGlFT.
Z""1N6 "0' Cl!'l'1C1! DI&Tl'!ICT
FLOOD leNS "X~
eYILDINGI AIIleA ---.--14-'3" 5Q.1"T.
I'ET AIL 8ALE8 AND 6El'!YICE8 (eANl< 2~" 61' J AATIO I,",
OffiCI! Af'lEA -----.118341> 61'.
PAYeD Ai'lEA _n_____ 2_ eGo FT.
PA_ I"!<IOYIDED--'hb& ( 3-1-l.c. )
OPI'ICE PAIlKING 1"!!QUII'lED..-....39 ( 2.1-l.c. )
e.lN<PAI'lKING I'lEQJI1"!!D----h-13 ( 1-I-l.C. )
eAI'K D"'Ye.IN "TELLEI<llSTACKNC. SPACE-..-..-,,, CAI<ll
FAR----- 29 ( !.433"15ge4 )
I1I.R .11 (411""1591&4)
INTE1'1!IOI'< LANCIlCAFE Af'EA 2'!o1e Ill'.
!lUILDING I-IE~I-IT------'e FT.
~
I
I
~
I
~
I
m
~i
21
::;)1
~.
ILl
I:
i,
.1
<I
11I1
I!
~!
ts;
~j
t
-
1
..
.' !
f11
teE
fl=iE'
I --j
- ! ,
11
I
~
L
-l
//1
/ ~
"
.
t.
/'
I
r
m
.
.0
.z
.
o ~(G~~~~
fEB20
,
PLANNING &. DEVF l ()n~r N"
S r nIl, ~ ~
11)1
PROPOSED OFFICE AND BANK BUILDING FOR UNITED BANK ~ WALKER &. ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS P.A.
NORTHEAST COACHMAN AND BELCHER ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 701 'n'~p"" Rood ,,,.. S,il, J02, Sof,', H"b~. ""'da 34695 (127) 126:::~~
~',
/1
(,
l
11
REQUEST:
-Flexible Development approval to ....ce the front (south) setback
along Sharkey Road from 25 feet to five feet, reduce the front (west)
setback along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the front
(north) setback along Northeast Coachman Road from 25 feet to 15
feet, permit parking within the Institutional District and to increase the
area of a retail sales and service use from 10 percent (1,433 square feet)
to 18 percent (2,500 square feet) in the Office District, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 1.358 acres located on the southeast comer of North Belcher Road and Northeast
Coachman Road. The lot has 160 feet of frontage on North Belcher Road (west), 230 feet of frontage
on Northeast Coachman Road (north) and 262 feet of frontage on Sharkey Road (south). The site's
east property line runs north from the southeast comer of the site for approximately 146 feet. The
property line then runs northwest for approximately 168 feet and terminates at the northeast comer of
the site. The site is vacant with access available along Northeast Coachman Road and Sharkey Road,
The site is a comer lot and, due to its shape, has three front setbacks - Northeast Coachman Road,
Sharkey Road and North Belcher Road. The property has two side setbacks that form the east side of
the site (a northeast and east property line).
The site is located within a commercial area on North Belcher Road. Existing shopping centers are
located to the northwest and southwest. Offices and a social/community center (Masonic Temple) are
located to the south and a school is located to the east (Coachman Fundamental Middle School),
Farther to the east, south and north are single-family dwellings.
The uses within the proposed, two-story building include a 2,500 square foot of retail sales and
service bank and 11,830 square feet of office. The bank is included in the retail sales and service
definition of the Code. The bank will be located at the northeast comer of the building on the first
floor and will include three drive-though lanes on the east side of the building.
The Code limits the amount of retail sales and service use within the Office District to no more than
ten percent of the gross floor area (GF A) of the principal structure. The use of the principal structure
must be used for office purposes. An application meeting this criterion would be otherwise reviewed
as a Flexible Standard Development request. The applicant is requesting to increase the amount of
retail sales and service space that is permitted within the Office District from 10 percent (1,433 square
feet) to 18 percent (2,500 square feet), The requested increase in retail sales and service area to 2,500
square feet reflects a typical size bank branch. The applicant is aware that no additional retail sales
and service uses will be permitted unless such approval is resubmitted to the Community
Development Board,
Page 1
The request includes thre_nt setback reductions and one side se.k reduction. Of these requests,
the side (east) and two front (Northeast Coachman Road and North Belcher Road) setback reductions
would, also otherwise be reviewed as a Flexible Standard development application. The reductions
in all setbacks are for parking or drive aisles only and the proposed building will be setback a
minimum of 67 feet from any property line. The only setback reduction that, in and of itself, would
require a Level Two, Flexible Development approval is the front (south) setback reduction from 25
feet to five feet along Sharkey Road. Sharkey Road consists of a 66-foot right-of-way with
approximately 24 feet of pavement. Sharkey Road terminates approximately 500 feet east of Belcher
Road and this site, The proposed parking spaces will be located five feet from that property line and
approximately 40 feet from the edge of pavement. The lot immediately to the south of the site (across
Sharkey Road) is zoned Office District and is vacant. The lot farther south is zoned Institutional
District and is the location of the Masonic Temple (social/community center).
The proposed building includes a modem, building fayade, an off-white and green color scheme with
heavy use of green-tinted glass, brick panel insets and a flat roof. Staff recommends that a sloped or
mansard roof be substituted for the proposed flat roof in order to increase the level of architectural
detail and interest of the structure. The proposal also includes improving existing access points from
Northeast Coachman and Sharkey Roads. All property lines will be heavily buffered with
landscaping, including a tiered effect along all street frontages, providing a mix of foliage texture and
color and reducing the use of sod, which will exceed the intent and requirements of Code. All
proposed signage will meet Code requirements.
The requests are to reduce the required front setbacks along Sharkey Road (south) from 25 feet to five
feet, along North Belcher Road (west) from 25 feet to 15 feet and along Northeast Coachman Road
(north) from 25 feet to 15 feet, and a reduction in the side (northeast) setback from 20 feet to ten feet.
The request also includes an increase in the amount of retail sales and service space that is permitted
within the Office District in the proposed building from ten percent (1,433 square feet) to 18 percent
(2,500 square feet) for a proposed bank with three drive-though lanes.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on
February 15, 2001. The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible
Development approval, with the maximum development potential, requirements of Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Projects, and with all applicable standards of the Community Development
Code.
The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to reduce
the front (south) setback along Sharkey Road from 25 feet to five feet, reduce the front (west) setback
along Belcher Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the front (north) setback along Northeast
Coachman Road from 25 feet to 15 feet, reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet and to
increase the square footage of retail sales and service from 10 percent (1,433 square feet) to 18
percent (2,500 square feet) of the gross floor area (GFA) ofa 14,330 square foot office building in the
Office District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at 601 North Belcher Road,
subject to the following two conditions:
1) That the architecture of the building be revised to include a sloped roof or other, similar
architectural features; and
2) That all signage meets Code.
Page 2