The URL can be used to link to this page

FL01-02-08 , . . " j1V-frr~ .J~~~LOF rlltA'#- ,,\~~~\ ",'fffur'......(,v,l$~ ,.'> ~ji ',.;,;.. ..~" I ~. ~-"-'" ~~(,\ J/;/h i ~ ~ ~ II,~,.....'" ...~. -.==-,,- - <", ..c....\ :-"0-.-- ~, ""'"';;" ~ ~-.- L"l.:. ~ """......----- "<S"'\ ':...;("j;;;..~-- J~)." .\ "''''!'J'J.-'~..I1':1J ~",,, ,..........I)1TEY\"".. '111'1 . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (127) 562-4576 LoNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW HOUSING DMSION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES May 1,2001 Mr. Paul Kelley Kelley Investment and Management Corp. P.O. Box 3339 Clearwater, Florida 33767 RE: Development Order regarding case FL 01-02-08 - 667 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Kelley: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 17, 2001, the Community Development Board reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit a detached dwelling as part of a multi-family development, to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, to reduce the number of required parking from eight spaces to six spaces, and to permit a parking design other than what is required by Code, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Development Project. Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Board found that the proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the maximum development potential standards and all other applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community Development Board approved the application with the following two conditions: 1. That any future redevelopment initiatives include a parking design that complies with Code or is approved by the Community Development Board; and 2. That it be acknowledged that the parking in the right-of-way is not guaranteed and may cease without notice. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (April 17, 2002). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community BRIAN], AUNGST, MAYOR.COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER ED l-LART, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1 . Kelley, Page 2 667 Bay Esplanade - Development Order May 1,2001 . . Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call W. Ryan Givens, Planner at 727 -562-4504. Very truly y. ours, L.' n I 1,\ _\ ---'-c --, ),,4T'1 I I. I1.J.A /1 .' /;;i}.'~-,7. /, L../ .1' / / Gerald Figurski, Chairman Community Development Board S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending Applications\Bay Esplanade 667 Kelley\Bay Esplanade 667 development order-doc ( ,~ . . t~ ~~ C> ~ ~ -'-J t e- '-J 00 ~, ~ ~ N-t ~ e- O ~ -- '~,,~ . \J"" " t.. / ~ -..J ~ tt\ '" 'i (\, I ~~ , ~ - '!1 ! \. ! .' j' , , ! /' ! ;' ! ,- .I f ; : SITE PLAN APPRO~ CASE #;:l- 0/-(/ Z - CASE TYPE /te;'l~ ORe DATE CDB~E SIGNATUR DATE V ","",0 R1'}-\ - \ ,\ =2.0 FILE COpy ;t~ / ;; .=:--- ~.~: t~i - / t> , ! . . . --J--/ \ \ ~ -- ~. ----------- ~.~~ -=--.:::;---~. f~' - -------- . . f -..-/ .' \~. l \ \. \.0 r \ ~. ~ \ \ ~ \ \- \ i\ d' \ \ \ If !:L- E. "'" 1-~ l:}-re ~w- e\- II g iF \ L Il" Z- -:s-- ~ :1> !\p <.L l(;;:::: ~ ~ ~ Q ('l C :::::::::. f::;.~ l~~ \J' v z. ~ R- a-- ~IS If" . it SITE PLAN 1/ P~OV !t ! / CASE #-;-r., ~ i - CASE lYPE F'U'€;;;; ~ ORe DATE CDBDATEf~ SIGNAT~ DATE ~ / . / / z::<. r-.. ~_ ~"'~> ~~~L -""\ ~ ~~~ 7" ~-1: t" 5J~ '~ ~ 5 ~[~ ~i \' .. F\LE COpy .PLICA nON FOR SIT_LAN APPROVAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVicES AD1\1INISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTI:I MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 This form must be submitted for all applications for residential uses, accessory uses, nonresidential uses, fences, Signs, vested rights, development agreements, seawalls, docks, marinas and other marine structures and home occupations. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME: ifjl.J..hf INVC!>fuqw( ~\ MA-NA~€"f..l('r.)'l Cotf. 1'.o:t>C)( '3"3 S i a (fYt tl w~ pt- " : --1fb -325B FAX NUMBER :-.14h 3337"-7 - 01 44 MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER PROPERTY OWNERS NtJfSTM~'I t'{~ A~"""'C~T K tl.L t (list all owners) MAILING ADDRESS : 3>}pIL.)<:EUA( I fYl.~"3 ~. 0 . i30;( "3 "3 3' ~ : --.12 3-7S~ ~ CLt~lNf.l~.F<- 337'=>7 , FAX NUMBER: tt6"'0 (4-c; AGENT NAME PHONE NUMBER STREET ADDRESS: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: 007 BAi C5f{;~A bC" UN IT VJlr#~ ~-Pwr /1(..,/(. 7 2. ) S-47Sh 077 0070 gC'AJclJ Pr"f1~ / fcM.o~ 0 t= C)(:/snj\l'~ B<J/I..'b '~9 Ftl.D""" '31b \ (number of dwelling u~its, hotel rooms or square footage of nonres"~W~) , sa SulWey ILl't(,(/fJM- 7l y 111 :: / 4/~f' ..Z? &e:c M~(~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: (.J,.:J IT SIZE OF SITE: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES ~ NO _ - ,e.eI 0fZ, v cr ~ArJ.s,:;,'Il. v. I r.s . FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY: LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL: ZONING: ZONING CLASSIFICA nON OF ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: -r " SOUTH: FUTURE DESIGNATION: <K.F H ,. EAST: T WEST T SOUTH: ~+l EAST: RVH WEST: ~ ~ ;2SZ" FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS: NORTH: ..&(H S: application forms/development review/basic application.doc . . Project Description 667 Bay Esplanade Clearwater,FL Description To renovate one of 3 existing buildings located at the property. The renovation will convert a 3 unit dwelling into 1 single unit. This will reduce the number of units on property from 7 to 5. As requested by staff 1 parking space will be removed from the right of way parking. This is a tremendous reduction in intensity as well as as a short term sacrifice in rental income. The larger units on the property are commanding outstanding rental rates in comparison to the efficiencies which attract low income residents which is unprofitable and not the intended use for this property in the "tourist" district. This project will give the property a greater aesthetic appeal not yet achieved in the newly designated "Old Florida District" under the recently adopted beach by design plan. The "Key West" style architecture, tropical landscaping and overall curbside charm will help define this neighborhood style. It is my intention to renovate all the buildings on the property at least in future roof and siding materials to preserve continuity on the property. The building under consideration in this request has a roof system in dire need of repair and repairing current configuration would not upgrade the property as it has a mix of asphalt shingle, tar& gravel, flat buildup all requiring immediate replacement. The logical decision is one new roof system which is reflected in the renovation plans. I submit the application under the comprehensive infill redevelopment use. F1LE COpy . . CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2 nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: 1. The redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards; The parcel would not be able to be redeveloped due to lack of conforming parking, the parcel is currently non conforming and will reduce the intensity by 2 units and remove one parking space from city right of way. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The redevelopment of the property will definitely increase the value of the abutting property, after completion and reassessment this will also greatly increase the assessed value which will benefit the city with greater tax income. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; This use is permitted within the city as well as all adjacent properties. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses; All adjacent uses are multi family commercial with identical characteristics and parking considerations. FILE COpy . . 5. Suitable sites for redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater; Other sites may be available however I am a long term property owner wishing to reinvest,beautify,upgrade, and reduce the intensity of my property I have owned for many years. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The aesthetics of this project will have no comparison to any other projects or property in the "Old Florida district" as outlined in the beach by design plan. This project will be consistent with all goals and objectives for that section of the plan and may serve as the catalyst for further renovations on this theme and in this neighborhood. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The design of this project is the "Old Florida district" template, if that portion of the cities redevelopment objectives for the beach are to move forward than this type of project will serve as a model to other property owners in this district to upgrade their properties. It will send a clear mandate that small parcels of property can be redeveloped without grandiose development standards and start the beach community moving towards positive development growth. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; F\LE COpy . . I don't believe any of these issues affect the project due to any circumstances which may not meet the code already exist and would continue to exist should the project not proceed. In no way do any of the proposed improvements intensify any existing variances to the code,with specific concern to parking the number dwelling units is reduced from seven to five which wouid benefit parking considerations. 9. Adequate off street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; I don't believe that the distance of off street parking is met by the code. Several municipal lots are currently used by current tenants and visitors of this property and all adjacent properties, which are a short distance farther from the property than specified in the code. General standards for level one and level two approval 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,bulk,coverage,density,and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The redevelopment will provide all the above mentioned criteria. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The redevelopment will encourage future development and increase property values. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The redevelopment will not adversely affect any of the the above mentioned crite ria. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion> F\LE COP~ . . The proposed development is a reduction in the eurrent amount of traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is consistent with the adopted future direction of the community character, 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse affects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties The redevelopment will not adversely affect any of the the above mentioned criteria. . . I - ::c ~ Oz !.O w- Q~ -> t/)w O..J . ww Q:: t/) f5 ~ 0:: FILE COpy . COVERED PATI r S Z Q r6 CD q o Z Z Q o ,... o fh 0'1 N ~ U! I\) '" .~ AS-BUILT FIRST FLOOR 19ft. . OJ m o ~ o s: OJ m o ~ o o 3: 14.33' FILE COpy . . I ----------------- I 1 OJ I )> I r- I 0 I 0 I Z I -< I I I I .. ~ I I .~ I m I X r- 1 (i) S I ~ Z I Z (i) I Q - (J) " OJ I r =i I 0 m I "'0 0 0 m ::r ;0 ~ I 0 m 0 .tl! I ;;U Z 0 I 8 I " .'- - - - - - - - -- 0 I""" 0 ,... <: U) z Q -t - '" )> as '" ;S CD m 01 (/) C :XJ 0 0 AS-BUILT P :x: SECOND FLOOR m z 19ft. 14.33' F\LE COpy 9 ft 6 in. . D 2S~ -fen 0... :::1:_ ~li o c Z Z G') (0:0> ;=0:;=0 O't ;=0 0> ? REVISED FIRST FLOOR 5ft.6io. EXISTING COVERED PATIO G> ~m z?;S Q(I) :;o:! 0% OG> i: O~ !D Do'" (i) ~ o ." o -< m ;::0 . (I) :im _>< z- (i)~ )>- ;::oZ mQ )> CUm m>< c- ;::0 en o::! OZ i:Q r~~o 00 en -f c: o -< ex. WORKSPACE 8ft. 1fHl 5 ft. 6 in. 19 ft. 14.33' FILE COpy .." - r- ........ C'> c::> ~ 12 tli I [i~ a; 0 I 00 I WALK..IN C~ W..J I CLOS. Cl)LL . SrTTING I ex. ~ ~~ ..t AREA BEDROOM EX. <B}.'fj I ... 0 w UJ MASTER BEDROOM ~~..-...- 29.80' REMO'V; - -, FIXTURES I I WALK-IN I - _. -' - .=-.- - - \, " " ~ "\ I STUDY I I I I I 'E, ;/) B , / ...l " I' U ...._=___1' .~ co 4::! 11) . 4::! -= IX) ~ 9ft. 6 in. 5 ft. 6 In. . f8'ft.' 6 in. EX. 1 ST. FLOOR:AREAIll12$17 SF ex. 2ND. FLOOR AREA=889 SF EX. TOTAL=21516 SF ~ ~1 'l:88n ~fi'tI8t1.=m If USSERV ATION ADDITION=I64 S TOTAL ADtbITION=1661 SF 22.65' 52.45' -- - . NYJd :lOO~ OElSII\EIH lJ.. 8 a:= a.. :E . o z ~ ~ ! ~ Il.. 0:: Il.. 0 8 ~ 0:: 113~Wl.S L.l.. 8 0:: a. :E FILE COpy . . Materials list/color/design 667 Bay Esplanade Clearwater,FL · Materials Roof: standing seam metal Siding: Monsanto or similar composite/ channel rustic Trim: all windows/ wood Windows: various · Colors Roof: traditional galvanized gray Siding: seaside blue/gray Trim: white Windows: white finish · Design Key West! Tropical seascape/ FILE COpy 8UItJ)ING OIMIER'S NAME ~V1. E l E'f" . . 8UItJ)ING 3'I'R!"ET AOORESS (1ncIudlng ApI., Unit, SUIte, encM>r BldG. No.) OR P.O. ROUTE AND BOX NO. /" 7 14 &'5 /.A/J~K)E CITY STATE C'-EA~"re'- , . r,-,PIC."I/;I PROPE.R1'Y OESCRlP110N (lot and 8Iock Num'*-. Tee Paroel NumMr, Lea-I DMcriptJon, 'etl::.) . tt1T 7~'#. lI~. 7 (hA",OALI4V tJ,.,a I lie RfiP",,,,r PB. 2d pc,. 8 au (..0., HldehUa~ ~ntiaI. AddII1on, AClCeUO'Y, ere. men.. . nece..ry.) IJI'I/It r t'1JG/o/f'.s LA T1TUDEIlONGITUOE (0P'Tl0NA13 HORlZOKTAl DATUM: SOURCe: LI GPS (Type): ( ".."" -..... or ......-, U NAO le21 U NAD 1~ LI USGS Quad Map LI Other: ~11" uti ;.:uuu .Hil' 1U..jJ t .'\.,,\: FE.AL EMERGENCY ~NAGEM~ AG& NATIONAL FLOOD INSURAN,CE PROGRAM . ELEVATION CERTIFICATE 1m rtant: Read 1M lft$b'UetJons on 1 .. 7. SECTION A - PROPERTY O1I\INER INPORMA'TION .. "f:..:) u.."" O.M.B. No. 3067-0077 Expires .$uly 31. 2002 . RCTIQN B . FLOOD INSURANCE RAT!! MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION 8 t. NAP COMMUNnY NAME & COMMUNITY NUMBER 82. COUNTY NAME 83. STATE FiAt'lrNil'rrS.... CfT'" tJF "5'09~ MAP AND PANEl IS. SUFFIX 86. fiRM INDEX . I L NUMBER DATE EFfECTlVElREVlSED DATE 0007 0 B-I'i-1f a- -91. e Bl0. Indlaate1he sour.oe of.... Sue Flood !levatlon(BFE) 4ata ()J'baH IIood depth entered In 89. LJ AS Pro. QsJ FIRM . U Communlly Determined LI Other (Describe): 811. Indlc:ate1he elevation datum used forthe BFE 1n ~ 1KI NGVO 1929 U NAVD 1988 U other (Oesen'be): 812. Is ttI. buldlng located In a Coutal Banter Resources System (CBRS) area or otherwise Prof$eted Area (OPA)? U Yes OUlgne11on Cate: . . ,o~,I'JA . BASE FLOOO ~VATION(S) ~no AO, use depth offtooding) I (j I ~INO S!!.CTION e . BUIlDING ElEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED) C1. BuiId1ng eleyat\ons .re based on; LJCon8tNc:t101'\ Drawings. WBu.ding Under Construction" l I2:SJFirlishecl Construction -A new Elevation ~e wfI be requlRJd when construoUon of the building It complete. C2. Building D1qram Number -L- (s.teot h building diagr.m molt similar to 1he building for which this certificate is being eompktted - see pagM e and 7. If no dlegram a<lCUI'ately NPfe..ntt tM'bulldlng, provide _ sketch or photograph,) C3. Elevations - Zones A1-A30, AE.. AH, A (WIIh BFE), VE. V1..v30. V (with 8FE.), AR. ARIA.. ARJA.E. ARJA.1-A30, ARlAH, AAJAO Comp'. ~1'N C3e-i below eccordlng to the building d'-~m specl1led In Item C2. state the datum used. If 1he datum is different from the datum Utect for the BFE in Section e. c.on~rt the datum to that used for the BFE. Show field menurernents and datum conversion calculation. Use the $pace prOYlded or the Comments area of Sedion D or Sedlon G, as approprnste, to document the d~tum conversion. Oeturn C~nIComments 8evation referenoe mark used ~iF ~~"'E"rs Ooes the el.vetion reference mar1< used appear on the FIRM? LI Yes IK! No Q .) Top of bottom 1Ioor (I"cluding baernent or enclosure) t $"8 5'. ''1 . _ ft(m) l' Q b) Top or next hlgher.lIoor 8u.(,O..... a ~..!, ~ IS'. ~ 1't{m) lID Q c) Bottom of Iow.st horlzonbJlwuctufal member tv ZOl'lU only) IJJ It. . . _ tl(m) J Q d) Altached garage (top of slab) N I,.,. . fl.(m) ~ o .) Low_ elevetlon of machinery .nd/or equipment I ",5 ' - ~i 1iI. t ~I 'f i aeM<:lng 1M buUcSlng &u II.PI~(, 3 f;. S" . _ 'l(rn) a I) Lowe'8t ad,l8clent gnade (LAG) ~ . '::""1l{m) CI g) HIghest adjacent gn.cM (HAG) e, . -=- ft.(m) i Q h) No. of permenent openings (flood vents) within 1 It. .boy. adja~nt grade- iJ/,. ~ Q i) Totsl aRIa of all permenent ~nlngt (flood vents) In C3h ~/Ir sq: In. (sq. em) - . SECT10N D . SURVeYOR. ENGINEER. ORARCHrrECT CERTIFICAlION Thls certtncatlon.1I to be slgrwd and .ealed by . land surveyor, .ngln..r, or architect authorIZed by law to certify elevation Information. I t;.-t/fy that the/nformfltlon in s.ctloM A. B. and C on thi$ certilfcet. reprNMtts my bNI etfOlt$ to intllrpr_ the data avlJilabl.. I ClndtntlltJd thel ~ flIIfI(i *"ement may'" puniah1i1ble byflne or ;mpMgnmenl under 18 U.S. Code Section 1001. CelmFlS"S NAM LAUREN R. PENNY UCENSE NUIlot~ 4931 TITLE COMPANY NAME LAND SURVEYOR L.R. PENNY & ASSOCIATES.~N~ 10'730 IO.%. "VENUE NORn... "~ITY SE.MINOLE ST....TE F L ZIP COOE 3"'5'"7:"'1 r . ,&. _ f- 2tJa I TELEPHONen."1<~A'_ ~3W ADDRE88 SIGNA lURE ~J:: ~J::~R~r:: ~Inr:: J::nQ ~t"\NTlNIIATI('IN ~J::UA S:nrm 1t1.~1 RJ::PI A~J::~ All Por::vlt'")ll~ I=ntTlnf\l!::: F\LE COpy !j . JJN~i,'il:~~O()I~i~~. PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 8888 PG 1890 I'aroeIlD NuMber: 05-29-15-54756-017-0070 Ga_ #1 TIN: 59-3266855 Warranty Deed This Indenture, Made this Harbour Green, Inc., state of Florida 3 rd day of Jan uary, 19 95 A.D. . Between. a corporation existing under the laws of the 01 tn. County 01 HILLSBOROUGH ,5,ateo{ Florida ,grantor, lUld Kelly Investment and Management Corp., a corporation existing under the laws of the state of Florida wIIooco.ddRsois:P.O.Box 3321, CLEARWATER, Florida 34630 ofth.CoUntyof PINELLAS State of Florida ,grantee. Witnesseth rhat tho GRAJ"TOR. for and in .onsid.miOll of llt. sum 0{ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEN & NO/100($lO.OO) - - - - - - - - - - ~. and 0lIl0.r JOO<I and _bIe ~ 10 GRAl'<TOR ill _ paicl by GRANl'BE, 1lIe ICCOipt ......n:or is IJoroby ~ has pontcd, boqIil...haclS<llollOlllc-said GJtANTEE _ GRAN'I"BE'S -.. and .....~. tlIero\loMag~land, si'u.te.!yinllUld being in th. County of P lNELLAS Slate or Florida to wil: Lot 7, Block 77,Unit 5 MANDALAY,according to map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 27, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, and taxes subsequent to 1994. "1}!J'.coROlNO RllC~ l)$~ INT_ ~1iIlS_ !will' _ PtC_ REV_ '-'+'>~~llIl'~ Ii:> "'~. . '~~~~"""""""'."""'~"""""''''i~.-ol~SI45d!1''_'-''',_~___.__"", ,. ,,'r.' ~:' c,. 41 JEJ-lIllRIOlIR IlREER 00 $ ..... -.'" . llECOItIIIIG t $(" Karleen F. De Sl DOC STAf1P - Dl!21'l 3 $2,8~ By 0",,,,,)' ,". TOT1lI.; $2,806.00 CIlEC& AIIT. TEltllEIUI $2.8Qb.00 CIIlIIIIlEI $.00 -......~...#.r,;......~.,:',.."b",...~,:..i:,.r.-:..; -~/ 'OTA xP' ~ and the pnlor does hClOby fully .....rr.ntllt. title to ""id land, aad will defend the same apinst laMvl daiJno; of all ~l$Om; ""'-'"'r. (Se.l) (corpora:t;~_.~e.;ll) .,' clay ol January ;-'1'9-S-~ ".bY Green, Inc., a F lor ida Corporation. on llelIalf ortne <OlJlOtlltioll. He;' peucnaUy known to lllC Ut has produ<:cd his F lor ida driver's license as idenrifiClnion... This t>ocumeat p...... B)e :TURN T()/pIIlI CoftiIl Harbour arc.... lJIc. 9501 Bos. H"dIsborougb TAMPA. PI. 33610 STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Pinellas The f<ne&oiJIg ~ was ~ bcfon: D10 1Iti:s 3rd John caffill, Vice President of Harbour . ~~ '~..,. : FILE COpy --- "., '. - -'~ ~--~-- .,...-_..._,...--~ -,.-.- . A"",Or> \~5 }1'~' Mf~ ~ \ '11/ tJo ..-....-.. ...- .' . NoMt ClJ,ltt ~~ret ~ I j \,_ ~..a s, 1 ~ '; .....-..--....\ ~ . Cambria St i I .. lewil<l s~ j I I ~,/~ ...--- o-yal Wy I ~OOd s~'.' I >t, <! 'r--..... Avalon Sl } .; :1' ,\ ....---.----;;.~l .; 1 ~ \ .,'( ~ 0' i \'"' \.-- --.. ~f ~ \~ \ D f I c~....~r s. It \ -L !J! 1m Somerset St \ t . II) l\~ ~ ~ f...,... .. DW !J ltb6tf 1..1 Cf'cV;,p,J It.{ 5,.(2, 00 F\LE COpy Ij . INST # 95-007759 . JAN 11, 1995 4:18PM PlNELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 8888 PG 1890 PanclIDNum~r. 05-29-15-54756-077-0070 Gt3lIlee #1 TIN: 59-3266855 Warranty Deed This Indenture, Made this Harbour Green, Inc., state of Florida 3rddayof January, 1995 A.D. , Between a corporation existing under the laws of the oftheCounryof HILLSBOROUGH , S.ateof Florida ,grantor, and Kelly Investment and Management Corp., a corporation existing under the laws of the state of Florida whoseaddressis:P.O.Box 3321, CLEARWATER, Florida 34630 of the Counlyof PINELLAS State of Florida , grantee. Witnesseth .hat 'he GRA1'lTOR, for and in comideration of the sum of - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - TEN & NOj100($10.00) - - - - - - - - - - DO~. and other good and valuable consideration 10 GRN-iTOR ill hand paid by GRANlEE, Ibe receipl whereof is hereby acknowledged, h.. llflInted, bargained and sold 10 Ibe said GRANTEE and GRA1'l'rEE'S _......,.. and assigns forever, Ibe following desaibcd land, .ituate.lyingaJld being in Ihe County of PINELLA8 Stale of Florida towil: Lot 7, Block 77,Unit 5 MANDALAY,according to map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 27, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, and taxes subsequent to 1994. III Rr,coRDINO> ROC ~ DS~ !NT FliliS_ Ml'F ~ P/C_ REY_ $ Karle8n F. De Bl 8y , '" cD./ -"::_~~~'2."",~'."li:'i';.,''';V&;itm.\ji''''",:;,;;:'{~ti'J:''~~;-tms~~~996~5145:M.;y-;;o'ci_"''''''''_''';",,,,,,,,,,~,,,,",~_~~_,~, . - 01 IlEHARBOUR GREEN REctIRIIlNG 1 DOC STAIlP - DR219 3 TOTAL: CHECK AIIT. TENDEREI: CIlAH6E : $6.00 $2,800.00 $2,806.00 $2.80(,.00 $.00 -~.; /' 'OTA~' ~;!/- and tbe llflIRlor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and win defend !be same against lawful claims of all persons wltomsoever. herclIftto set abow written. J hn Co fill, Vice President P.O. Adem... 9501 F..axt HiIlsborougb, TAM~.A\ fJ.. !l36;J<t -" 1J' ".".. ~- .~~. " ",.> (Seal) STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Pinellas (~~ ';-0"" (Corporafe,8e.a,), ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me Ihis 3rd day of January ;"'19.95-. "'b~' John Coffill, Vice President of Harbour Green, Inc., a Florida Corporation, on behalf of rhe corporation. He is personany known 10 me or bas produoed bis F lor ida driver's license as identification. Thi., DOCWIlCJ\t Prepared By: :TURN T()Jphu Colflll Harllour Green, IDe. 9501 Easl Hillsborougb TAMPA, PI. 33610 E ZI 6. MlCIfAfL MACKENZIE MY COIIMlSSlON, CC DIIlrl EXPIlES: August S. 1W1 .......nau NoIIrJ_lIIIlIInnIIII ~Il. l!b;':U UU, Hill lU. .JJ hU': .. . ' , . FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY NAT~NALFLOODINSURANCEPROGRAM , ELEV A liON CERllFICA TE ~lIl'"1 " O.M.B. No. 3067-0077 expires .$uly 31,2002 1m rtant: Read tha Instructions on 1 . 7. SECTION A - PROPERTY OWNER INFORMAilON eUll.OING OWNER'S NAME .R/ltI/. c UE'f BUILDING 5TR!!T ADDRESS (Inducllng Apt., Unit, SUite, and/or Bldg. No.) OR P.O. ROUTE AND BOX NO. /' 7 14 ES L.AIJ A KJE CITY STATE CLEA~WRn:- " . r,-,p.e/II~ PROPERlY OESCRIPTlON (Lot and BIoc:k Numbe,.. Tu Parcel Number, Leg.1 Description, 'etc.) t(n 7."A Llc.77 (hANOALI4Y t.JloJlr /vc R€:pc.,-.r 1'8. 20 B IL. INO (..0., .1lId.ntla~ Non-rMlldential, Addllon, AtXAuory..rc.. ommen.. IJ 1'1111.1 mGvrs LA TITUDEIlONGITUDE (OPTIONALJ ( ,... JItI' - ...- or flflJIHIW) HORIZONTAL DA ruU: U NAD 1m U NAD 1ge3 SOURCe: LI GPS (Type): I_I USGS Quad Map U Other: ~CTION B .. FLOOD INSURANCe RAT!! MAP (FIRM) INFORMATION 81. NFlP COMMUNITY NAME & COMMUNITY NUMBER 83. STATE cAVZr,J;tTE.... CfT"f'dF ;z.5'09~ . MAP AND PANEL BS. SUFFIX 86. 'IRM INDEX NUMBER DATE 0007 0 -1'l-1f 8- -91 E 810. Indloate the so~ of1h. EM.. Flood elevation (BFE) data or ba$e 1I00d depth entered In 89. U FIS Profile IAJ FIRM U Community Determined 1-1 Other (Describe): B11. Indleate the elevation datum used for the BFE In 89: USJ NGVO 1929 U NAVD 1988 U Other (Describe): 812. Is the buldlng Iocated)n a Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) area or otherwise Protected Area (OPA)? ,U Yes Designation Date: l ovt Iii'''' . BASE FLOOD ELEVA TION($) ~ne AO, use aeplh or flooding) /0 I ~INo S!!CTION C - BUILDING ELEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY REQUIRED) C1. Building ele)f8tions are bated on: LJConstructlon Drawings. LJBulding Under Constructlon-! 1~.IFini$hed Construction -AnliW E1watlon Certllk:ate wi. be required when construction of the buDding 1$ complete. C2. Building Diagram Number --L- (Seleot 1tIe building diagram moJt similar to the building for which 1his certifICate is being completed - $e Ii< pag.. e and 7. If no diagram aocurately ...preeants the building, provide ~ sketch or photograph.) C3. ElevaUons - Zones A1-A30,14E.. AH. A (With BFE), VE, V1-V30. V (with BFE), AR. ARIA, ARJI4E.. ARlA1-A.30, ARlAH, ARJAO Comp'.t. Item. C3a-i below aeeordlng to the building dl.~.m specl1led In Item C2. State the datum used. If the datum is different from the datum used for the 8FE in Section e. convert the datum to that u$ed forthe BFE. Show field m~il&ur.n'lents and datum conversion C1!lculation. Use the s~ce provided or 1he Comments arell of Section D or Section G, as appropri8te, to document the datum conversion. Datum ConverslonIComments 8evation referenoe mar1< used ~E' ~m"'E...n Does the eleVation reference m8rX used appear on the FIRM? LI Yes ~I No Q a) Top of bottom floor (Including buementorenclosure) t $"8 ~,''1 . _ ft.(m) 1 Q b) Top of next htgherftoor 80'1.0,,.1,, a (J.....:. ~ 15...5L ft,(m) 100 a c) Botto. m of lowest ho~ontal structural member (V zones only) tJJ ~ . . _ ft.(m) 1 ~ a d) Attached garage (top ofslab) N / f'I . _ ft.(m) f 1 Q .) Low.. .levatlon of mac:hlnery and/or equipment ~ ~~.~ . w,,; $aMoIng the building BUII.I>,w", 3~.> . _ ft.(m) l i Q f) Lowest adjacent grade (LAG) V .:-.. ft.(m) II Q SI) Highest adjacent grade (HAG) 6 . - ft.(m) ! o h) No. of permanent openings (flood vents) within 1 ft. above 'dj.~nt grade' JJ//t ~ Q i) Total area of all permanent openings (flood vents) In C3h /'i/A sq: In. (sq. em) . SECTION 0 - SURVEYOR, ENGINEER. OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATlON This certlbtlon Is to be signed and sealed by a land surveyor, engineer. or architect authorized by law to certtry elwatlon Information. , ~ th<< the Infonmlllon in S<<t/OM A. 8. and C on this certJlcet. repr.Mni. my bHl "'oIts to interpret th. data svaPab/&. I und&rstsnd that tIfIy fliJ/s(i .tatemlNlr may tHI punjahllbltl by flrHI or impr;sonm."i under 18 U.S. CexH, Section 1001. CERTl"~'S ~I! LAUREN R. PENNY LICENSE NU~B~ 4931 TITl~ COMPANY NAME LAND SURVEYOR L.R. PENNY & ASSOCIATES.7W~ 107'30 I at. AVENUE '41TY 5E.MINOLE STATE F L ZIP CODE 3'3"7~~ < . ,4. OAT ~ f. 'lOo I TELEPHONE 71..'7 - ~c:r, - ~ 3100 ADDRESS SIGNAnJRE ~I=I= RI=VI=R~1= ~In~ I=(,)R r":(,\l'JT1"'IIATI(",\~ RI=PI Ar":I=!': AI I PR~I("'\IIS i=nITI(,)~I" I=l=aAA l=:nrm 1l1_~1 ~IL U(j, ;.:UUU THl.I IU: JJ F.U . . . "'t!J \ II J ,J . I~PORT ANT: In the.. .pace_, copy the corr..pondlng information from Section A- BUILDING STREET ADDRESS (Inc:Iuding Apt., Unit Sulllt. .ndlor Bldg. No.) OR P.O. UTE AND BOX NO. ~7 y. ES /JAPE . CITY STATE ZIP CODE ClEAn ArEK. l-~i'eIIO'" SECTION D - SURVEYOR, ENGINEER. OR ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION (CONTINUED) Copy both sldos of this Elevation Certmcate for (1) community official, (2) insuren~ egent/company; IInd (3) building owner. COMMENTS /y(}/6 .' pH/t..npl-t: .5T~~rv~~ ()~ L-clT BF-'Kkfl'llfltCt. $1't.S{J :J?/#ELLM ~OV'^,n PIS ,<- Q. .' """...~.~ /'1'7 EU?#I', :0 6,(fq 8CIJCHMAIt/(: tf'Rft. ri. @ ~r9 .!JIIY ESI'L.Il1~ADf:- = ~"7 I I Check here if attachments SECTION e - BUILDING eLEVATION INFORMATION (SURVEY NOT REOU.IRED) FOR ZONE AO and ZONE A (WITHOUT BFE) For Zone AO and Zone A (without BFE). c:omplete Items E1 through E3, If the BevlJlion Certiffcate is intended (or use as supporting informf!ltion for e LOMA or LOMR-F, Section C must be completfKI. E1. Building Oiagrem Number _ ($.I~t the buDding dlaigram most similar to the building for which this certificate is being completed _ $" pages 6 and 7. If no diagram accuMely represents the building, pro."lde a sketch or photograph.) E2. The top of the bottom floor (induding basement or enclosure) of the building Is LLl ft.(m) LLljn.(cm) U above or U b~low (cheek one) the hlghestadjacent grade. , E3. For Zon. AO only; If no flood depth number is available, Is the top of the bottom floor elevated In accordance with the community.s 11 lain malUS e.ment ordinance? Yes No Unknown. The local omclal must certify this information in Section G. SECnON F . PROPERTY OWNER (OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE) CERTIFICATION Hie property owner or owner's authorized representative who completes Sections A, e, and e for Zone A (without a FEMA-issued or com nlty~u d BFE) eJr 2Sr AO MJat slQn here. ~ Coft.f . PROPER WNER' O'Mll' AUTHO ~ REPRESENTATIVE' 537 ( ZIP CODE COMMENTS TELEPHONE -:S238 SECTION 0 - COMMUNITY INFORMATION (OPTIONAL) The local 0~1 who is authorized by law or ordinance to admlni$ter the community's floodplain management ordinance can complete Section5 A, B, C (or E), and G ofthis Elevation CertifiCmi, COITl'lete the applicable item(s) and sign below. G1. U The informstion in Section C was taken from other documentation that has been signed and embossed by a licensed surveyor. engineer, or architect who Is authorized by state or local law to certify elevation Information. (Indicate the source and date of the elevation data In the Com~nts area below,) G2. U A community official eompl.d Section E for a building located in Zone A (without a FEMA.issued or community-is5ued BFE) or Zone AO. G3. U The following Infonnatlon (Items G4-(9) is provided for cormlunity floodplain management purposes. G4. PERMIT NUMBER GS. DATE PERMIT ISSUED <36. DATe CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE/OCCUPANCY ISsueo Gr. This permit has been iaued for. U NeoN Construction U Substantfallmprovement Ga. Elevation of as-built IOlN!st 1Ioor (Including basement) of the building Is: G9. BFE or (In ZoneAO) depth of floodIng 8tthe building site Is: L.OCAL. OFFICIAL'S NAME U Check here if attachments . _ ft.(m) Datum: . _ ft.(m) Datum: TiTlE COMMUNITY NAME SIGNATURl! COMMENTS TELEPHONE DATE I Check here if attachments ~~'A.II. ~",.,." A1_"l1 .11.1 II":: 9C1 R~PI Ar~c:: t.1 I PR~VIr.II<: rnrTlrH.'''' ----.....- -ed_-- . NoR11f CLmbJltret ~~ \ ' \ ~.... ~ a '-,.___ ~cacia St i -1"'" -............----,. ~ l~ . i "" ~ ,m -....---..-.4 Somerset St i 1/1 '. -----l "'13 ~ j 1 g) ;; f 1 :I Cambria St j I , ~ I . \l leYlild St I . _-'j /r'--" I ! ./ ~ Y .---.- oyal Wy! ~ ~o~ i . Avalon St I ....-.-..----....-1 :l!" ~, 4!~ s:: .~ 1lI~ :;1 i t........ :>, -"-. < ! .r-----~ air " El! l lXl '~ \ .5! t'O , ~ \~ t--- ! I~ \ l' clearwa*er St \ r---- - . . See Revised The following materials have been superceded by revised documents. . . Project Description 667 Bay Esplanade Clearwater,FL · Description To renovate one of 3 existing buildings located at the property. The renovation will convert a 3 unit dwelling into 1 single unit. This will reduce the number of units on property from 7 to 5. As requested by staff 1 parking space will be removed from the right of way parking. This project will give the property a greater aesthetic appeal as well as reduce the intensity of 7 units on the property. The roof system on the subject building is in dire need of repair and repairing current configuratior would not upgrade the property. I submit the application under the comprehensive infill redevelopment use. . ~~~~~:~m. ~~~i(:Mf'~~ ~~~~~~";' ~H;~;,:;tf0~ ~~~:1: II . B - :x: ~ Oz ~o w- o~ -> tJ)w 0....1 ww tJ) :> w 0:: = g . - l- t/) <( !:!:!.z 0:0 <(- wI- o:~ OW w..J t/)W :> W 0: .. . . COVERED PATI r- <: z Q OJ m c ;0 o o 3!: N C 1.0 i>> Z q Z 0 r- Q 0 en OJ m C OOJ ~ 0 3: (]I Do~D '" ~ O! I EXISTING BALCONY ABOVE r 0 I 0 OJ I r- ~ 0 -I I en ::I: --------------,--- 00 I m I )( I Cii I -I '" I Z .N OJ 0, I Q m O! I en 0 I -I ::0 I ~ 0 I ::0 0 en s: I I I OFFICE AS-BUlL T FIRST FLOOR 19ft. 14.~' . . 19 ft. 14.33' . EXISTING COVERED PATIO G> ~m Z~ cen ;:u::! OZ oQ 3!: . en =im ::!)( Z- G>~ >z ;:UQ m ~ ---- REMOVE I FIXTURES I --=----, ~ I , lO , WALK-IN I ~ -' '\ I STUDY I ~ ~ I I co Ol ... MASTER I I BEDROOM 'Is ) / / .6 . (I)' ,; 9 , ,; ct> , (J "'--=--- / ~ lO 9 ft. 6 in. 5 ft. 6 in. EX. 1 ST. FLOOR AREA=1267 SF '18ft.'6 in. EX. 2ND. FLOOR AREA=889 SF EX. TOT AL=2156 SF 22.65' 1 ~1 ~c88~ ~BBlf/8~;m ,~ 29.80' OBSERVATION ADDITION=164 S 52.45' TOTAL ADDITION=1561 SF 12 ft. . SITTING AREA I I I WALK-IN I I EX. BEDROOM EX.~Ali REMOVE C&~~~ CLOS. ~ ...; ... a: o cO w..J f/)LL. :;c wZ a:0 o w f/) . . 11 r o o ;;0 11 ~ s: z Q ;;0 o o 11 11 ~ ~ z G) STAIRWELL ~ \) :;0 o o 11 REVIseD ROOF PLAN ',.. \ J; 2. 3. 4- "... ~ . ~- 7, B. I q. ~1~SIi/G . !/\Jr/w 6 67 ~ ~'c~~ 6: ....... IP/~nC/h.- fHl714Pvr Mttllf71or'S / ~,.Jl'p. WItt.- /JDt U Ii/d tlJluc /1A/ltU11<5e t!,H.A/B. {€J eOAl1ff74tE ~o 16"5/wlt-l-- ge ~f t/;pf/ht>Hl> j?p~ /.P- ;~. 1(;'""3' /wIt<- M N4sr tll'f~ ~~f'd1W/ /r ~r ~rtl'"t> 'I (;!!, / t.I J{.L. 1M' tllJ l.b f1;ciU lJiO- # sdc.r / /~eH Ill" .) c5/t? I'\.J . No 10. y8S 1----- {CVe /. ,/c-'"5 ( IN II/l-~;J t J. w IU ";0 1" 1It,.Jl)~ f/J/U- f't15S14ty 6tP/~ r'lJ# vl'f[//l.1<d 3. /pIU ~o-r itbvOO61f ~. /ft.jfU- IMf',.t.3c/& 4. 'I t5! l-e'DtJeP /ffNJfI;Jr or ,JII/tU--N4 vpl /0 ~ _ CI es / J? /ltJ1/ /1J611J4J1l ",1.-- / L J / f I / - /vtllr f/d/./)dlJrlJ:J /h'-l./) sn;""9f/N::J. 0. 7' e'3 · / -tW ~.f ( /'tI1,4Of (f/ / o771V1C f'" .eo~rM7<D . --- Receipt No: 1199827398 Date: 2/23/2001 Line Items: ease No FL 01-02-08 Payments: Method Check CITy Cth'>VAT<A FEB.23'01 1 # CU/VAF: TOTL C/-lei< M25843 102.08 1205.00 1205.00 :[205.00 10:54 B \,../ TranCode 04 DeacrlptIon Flexible CommercIal Revenue Account No. Payer KELLEY INVESTMENT IIMk No Acct Check No 4618 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: Amount Due $1,205.00 Amount PaId $1,205.00 $1,205.00 . . . ~1KT-'r4:~ .1?\t.x.~LOF T/(t'Jt~ .."l'....~' Off1iTxLr.".~c;7>~ "~:(:"""'jt -++,~_ ""V::;:"J I ~,.....-':. ,,~Z,\ J/ " i ~ !? .. ~ ~,.., '-Ill ...~. -=~ :-.""""''' "'~\ ~-'- , ~~ "'~.;;.~ -,-- l"l.;:', w\yfi------ .'c--.....~,;:\ -'..;rIA---H;iJJ~~."" "";#...}1THt,J,t '#"11'" CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW HOUSING DMSION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 May 1,2001 Mr. Paul Kelley Kelley Investment and Management Corp. P.O. Box 3339 Clearwater, Florida 33767 RE: Development Order regarding case FL 01-02-08 - 667 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Kelley: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the Community Development Code. On April 17, 2001, the Community Development Board reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit a detached dwelling as part of a multi-family development, to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, to reduce the number of required parking from eight spaces to six spaces, and to permit a parking design other than what is required by Code, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Development Project. Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Board found that the proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the maximum development potential standards and all other applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community Development Board approved the application with the following two conditions: 1. That any future redevelopment initiatives include a parking design that complies with Code or is approved by the Community Development Board; and 2. That it be acknowledged that the parking in the right-of-way is not guaranteed and may cease without notice. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (April 17, 2002). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER (1) BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . Kelley, Page 2 667 Bay Esplanade - Development Order May 1,2001 . . Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call W. Ryan Givens, Planner at 727-562-4504. very. truly yours,.. /.... <. ,?j ~1 I I/~. /L fA I) ~:-rjj/~.c. /;:tr[/ ,1' ,/ Gerald Figurski, Chairman Community Development Board S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending Applications\Bay Esplanade 667 Kelley\Bay Esplanade 667 development order.doc . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW HOUSING DMSION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES February 23,2001 Mr. Paul Kelley Kelley Investment and Management Corp. P.O. Box 3339 Clearwater, Florida 33767 RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (FL 01-02-08) Dear Mr. Kelley: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to permit a detached dwelling in the Tourist District and to allow a parking lot design other that what is required by Code at 667 Bay Esplanade and determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FL 01- 02-08. The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on March 15,2001 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle A venue in Clearwater. Please call Amy Ruscher, Staff Assistant at 727-562-4579 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. ;J; yo S, w.y~ Planner BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ].B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, COMMISSIONER ~ BOB ClARK, COMMISSIONER F. DAVID HEMERJCK, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . - u SUBJECT: FL 01-02-08 DATE: April 17, 2001 PRESENT A TION MA TERIALS . ~ &.rwater o SUBJECT: FL 01-02-08 DATE: April 17, 2001 Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a detached dwellinS! as part of a multi-family development. to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet. to reduce the number of reQuired spaces from eiS!ht spaces to six spaces. and to permit a parkinS! desiS!n other than what is reQuired bv Code. as part of a Comprehensive Inflll Redevelopment Proiect. I. Site Description - 0.278-acres A. Location 1. East side of Bay Esplanade 2. Adjacent to Clearwater Harbor 3. North of the causeway and roundabout B. General vicinity 1. Attached dwellings & small motels 2. Building styles resemble 1950's architecture 3. Bay Esplanade a. no sidewalks b. perpendicular, back-out parking on most sites c. need of redevelopment C. Beach by Design 1. Old Florida District a. residential neighborhood b. recommends single-family and townhouse redevelopment c. acknowledges lack of parking - hind redevelopment (Bay Esplanade) d. recommends shared parking strategy to assist revitalization D. Existing Site 1. 7 Dwelling units 2. 3 existing buildings a. good conditions b. no particular architectural style 3. Paved site a. Almost entirely covered b. Blends into neighboring site to southwest 4. Parking a. Four spaces in right-of-way b. Two spaces to site's interior c. Existing buildings and site layout prevent other parking configuration II. Proposal A. Convert one building from three unit attached dwelling to single-family house. B. Reduce the site's intensity from 7 units to 5 units (less intensive) C. Footprint expand by 361 square feet . . D. Two-story, Key West- style structure E. FEMA requirement - improvements over 50% over a five-year span F. Owner intends to pursue future redevelopment by limited to economic constraints G. Parking 1. changed slightly 2. remove one space from right of way 3. add one to site's interior III. Request A. (1st) Permit a detached dwelling in the Tourist District 1. Proposal meets the intent of the Code by maintaining multi-family on site. 2. Attaching the remodeled building to other structures is impractical B. (2nd) Reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 52 feet 1. Site is irregular in shape 2. Rear of site is 114 feet (meets intend of Code) 3. No other permitted uses for this lot size C. (3rd) Reduce number of required parking from eight spaces to six spaces 1. Code requires full compliance with parking section if the proposal includes improvements in excess of 25% of the value of the structure 2. The existing site provides six spaces 3. New proposal provides six spaces 4. Site is becoming less intense 5. No redevelopment is worse situation D. (4th) Permit a parking layout other than what is required by Code 1. Staff does not normally support parking in the right-of-way; however, 2. The parking currently existing 3. One parking space will be removed to provide better circulation 4. Existing site layout prevents efficient parking 5. No redevelopment is worse situation IV. Staff Recommends Approval wI Conditions 1. That any future redevelopment initiatives include a parking design that complies with Code or is approved by the Community Development Board; and 2. That it be acknowledged that the parking in the right-of-way is not guaranteed and may cease without notice. FL 01-02-08 667 Bay Espanade 8" FASCIA 6" TRIM (TYP.) 12" FRIEZE -= ~ II':':':,:,:,:,::: ............... 1111111I11111I1I I. ....... ...........1...:.:.:.: :::::::::::: :::::::::: ::::::::::: 111111111111 111111111111111111111 '~:_'-:~~- -..~ ::: I II1111IIII1II1 ~ml1 II iWl~ m~H :~:~:~ . '"'. :'" ". '",,,!,.-- . II. , '-... " ~ i. t.l.", ~ ... .. :, ~"t, '1: ~ '.. It VINYL FASCIA & SOFFITT GAL V. MTL. ROOF (RAISED SEAM) "CHANNEL-RUSTIC" SIDING :: .: >: -. ~ ~ . ':;: 111111 IHHH . r." . ~ ...., ....., ~.:::..~ . 1111111 IIIII1 ", " ,...-~ ,~'t '.' . ............ ", ""..........." REVISED FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION ~(t~rwater o . . ;' FL 01-02-08 ~(Cfuarwater 667 Bay Espanade u ~ NORTH 1"=200' Aerial Map Keffey Investment & Afanagement 667 Bay Esplanade FL 01-02-08 " f: 'I hFS~ \i~i' PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ~I ENGINEERING ." .. " :$ Iii ~ NORTH 1"=1320' co .S ll. C) ..,. :g .. C) ~ N O'l o ~ '6 IV $ w ocation Map Keffey Investment & Mll11agement 667 Bay Esplll11ade FL 01-02-08 ~ z o " ,. €\ DR lilll""'...., /~ SEAS--"__ ~~...."'" ~ (> d, ~~ ~ (') ~..... , ~ ~",.2- 6~ \~\:~ '.#:/ ":.~..~tEA .'f~'l' ....,..,,1"((/111 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ~ ~ 8 9 7 675 '" "" 6 t 5@"'4!"''''2 1 ~ \jl1"~ o "" <00 "'''" 692 \!.:!J '" '" "'''' ",,,, ,693 1 SOMERSET ~ 5T ;:<t~ 1/ ~~ ~ ~ ltd. '<l~ % ~-~ .,~ ~ ~ ~ 60 ~ CAPRI MOTEL~ 11 w CONDOS. 48-07 ::> 12672 ~ 5 :> 665 1 3 662 4: 4: i= 655 W en z 16 650 ~ 1 ~ ~ n /C--- ~17 / /' ~ 18648 C> " T6'O '(;, 6'$ 3 1 9640 7 14 658 n .v::::Jf 15654 lI) '" 7 \ 668\ 664 f"'I 687 ~ 685 1 2 r ~ €; f"'I I TlISISNaTA I SURVEY \ 689 13 8 4 661~ ~ 3 PENTHOUSE SHORES CONDO. 13-50 THE FIVE PALMS MOTEL CONDO 73-69 673 2 11 654 12 650 669 8 13 ~.-;-~ ~4@~ \ "'"6 Y ~ p S ~ 8 ~ Q) ~ ~ 20 638 649 1 - 6291 m.~4 2 .... 632 - 619 ~'\~ LV" 9 ~ ~~4 I~~ 622 20 8 5~ $ 4092-915 14 ----- 0 6 I O~g ~b 7449 -1284 co-- .s 0 () I " I yR - MCK~VPARK ~ - -~ 8 g~ ~ l::' 6~~\~ .g ~( : ~JUANITA WAY ~ ~f- .... :61- ~ 603 1 o _ ~ "> 4: 581 5 ~ ~ 579, 2-( ) S ~~ Tbn ~ 604 ~ 575 3 ~ J o\: 1602~ 0 ""'1 \"' .. -' t co o '" 9 o co ~ ~ OWNER: :y . :i'i .~ SITE: u: o co WAY \,.~ ^" ;i~'/': ~9 ; 0 /f\ ESPLANADE g ~~ ~ 60 6;~ 60 \ 1 0 ~ \ 11 612\ 60 ~ 5 1 610 UJ ()~~ ~ ~\4 ~ 609 ~ ~ 12608 -< 617-q ~ 605 p.. ~ 611C\l 3 Vl 60~Cii ~1\~ _ - 7 p:. \-F"" 1 4 607 2_ 601 _~ \==- BAY 584 \ 1 6 E<;plJ\NADE 599 ~ J!mo 36~ f"'I JUANITA 5835>; 16580~1 01 WAY_ ~ ~'r ~ 5794~@ 175~; \ I 3',Z f"'I 557~ ~8 566 J ~ -t- ""5\ "-../ ~ ...... 605 606 ~ ~ 2 -, 2 L- ro · 600 11 f 3 ~.. 584 1 :55 ~ 4 0 ~ l.l. W E-4 9 5 I 1.~ .q. ~ P 7 ~..~ fe .... FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST Kelley Investment & Management CASE FL 01- 02- 08 PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 0.27 :. ~ 667 Bay Esplanade PIN: OS/29/15/54756/007/0070 ~ 9 .., tV o :'!: iJ.i ATLAS 258A PAGE: !\ I- - - w - ::> z Q ~ <( I-- ~ :3 I-- 0 I-- I-- 9- >- <( I-- ...J <( 0 0 z <( I-- ~ I- - <Xl <:- .~ ~ .. ~- ~ 0 .. "0 lll_ ::;: <<: of-- It) gj 9 ~I- ~i] ~ 1- .. .. ~cL- II ~ <( :> (f) t :g '" 9 0 I I 2 10 9 .~~~, 6 2 1 5 4 :3 [U' t l~ to 2 ~~~~~~~ 6 --, 4 2 1 )> :3 -< , I{Ci f5f\) \ 1 10 11 . M "9 ~~~ ...l~t ~~~t{\Iv <( l."'" 71{"- 1 4 6 15 5 16 1--- 17 4 :3 18 2 19 ~ 1 20 ROYAL 1 2 e--- - :3 9 4 5 I--- - 6 7 1 1'0.1{ I ~ 8 JUANITA WAY 1 I " lii ::: ~ OWNER: :g .. :0 ~ SITE: u:: lii ::: '" ~ ~ .. o $ Iii SOMERSET 5T . \, ~ .In.''' \ \. ~~.~ ;"'0.\ '\1"" ~.(\I ~,x: S'\}\)J-1 2 or Z ~ f11 7 5 8 4 , <( 3 ,rl\I ;",~ ~ 1= . V' \,'\~ ~ \\;",f~11"l3 11 z~i1^UI' .1\\)1 6 J"l{e'1 12 a. .L.----- 8 ,7} 5\ 6Y 4 <( WAY \ 1~ _l t . nt{\l $ l~i~~~l~\; 8 s~~ ~Cv ~~ ESPLANADE I \, 11-- 13 1 10 ~11 ~..(~\.. ot{\l ~. t(f'i-"v, o,\. f$ ~ 9 J ~\ ~~e.&'b~' ~ A) ~~,(\,\ r 12 _L_ ~~ c-- 13 )lCC 32 11 3 7 1 -=-- \:=== -6 \ 1 ~ _ ~ JUANITA 5 16 Y6 WAY ~ -s: \ 7 .; 5 4 q " ~ o ~ ~ ~ K 20 8 ~ ~ I? ~ ~ EXISTING SURROUNDING USES Kelley Investment & Management \ ~ ~~ ~ I THIS IS NOT A I SURVEY 667 Bay Esplanade CASE FL 01- 02- 08 I PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 0.27 PIN: OS/29/15/54756/007/0070 ATLAS 258A PAGE: ~ r- iMa C ... . Beach by Design .,'--.. I ij \ i ii i j fF:;7 l ; I"'; i Ii Ii i i II " i j ;;!i i i if Ii f ,; !! if, ! i~~~~::~~~~~~~1i i ..j ( j If t ;' IF! i Ii ! j .; ! .i b / <. -; .-.~.) "0,-.-..:'::"''':1\ ! i-':" .~ \\ . l.~.,._._._.,. "" -..........._._:-.-.-."'.10.'...\ -'\ i , j ......... ~. ..... /' ....-.... .;.",," .'.-.......;.-.-......... A. The "Old Florida" District The area between Acacia and Rockaway is an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia. Existing uses are generally the same as the balance of the Beach. However, the scale and intensity of the area, with relatively few exceptions, is substantially less than comparable areas to the south. The mix of uses in the District favors residential more than other parts of Clearwater Beach and retail uses are primarily neighborhood-serving uses. Given the area's location and existing conditions, Beach by Design contemplates the renovation and revitalization of existing improvements with limited new construction where renovation is not practical. New single family dwellings and townhouses are the preferred form of development. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. Lack of parking in this area may hinder revitalization of existing improvements, particularly on Bay Esplanade. A shared parking strategy should be pursued in order to assist revitalization efforts. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach 7 City of Clearwater, Florida " " . , CDB Meeting Date: April 17, 2001 Case Number: FL 01-02-08 Agenda Item: C4 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER: LOCATION: REQUEST: PLANS REVIEWED: SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: DIMENSIONS OF SITE: PROPERTY USE: Current use: Proposed use: PLAN CATEGORIES: ZONING DISTRICTS: Kelley Investment & Management 667 Bay Esplanade Flexible Development approval to permit a detached dwelling as part of a multi-family development, to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, to reduce the number of required parking from eight spaces to six spaces, and to permit a parking design other than what is required by Code, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Development Project. Site plan materials submitted by Paul Kelley 0.278 acres; 12,144 square feet The property is an irregular lot of approximately 92 feet by 132 feet. Attached dwellings Attached and detached dwellings RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification T, Tourist District ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Overnight accommodations West: Attached dwellings East: Clearwater Harbor South: Clearwater Harbor and overnight accommodations Page 1 ,. ----- . , CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mix of land uses including attached dwellings and overnight accommodations. ANALYSIS: The 0.278-acre site is located on the east side of Bay Esplanade adjacent to Clearwater Harbor. The site is comparable to many neighboring sites. The existing site contains seven dwelling units housed in three buildings. The buildings are in good condition yet bare no particular architectural style or period. The front of the site is almost entirely covered with asphalt and blends into the parking area of the adjoining property. Four parking spaces are located perpendicular in the right- of-way, the southernmost space blocks access to the site's interior. Two other spaces are located in the parcel's center. The buildings and site configuration prevent an efficient parking and landscaping plan layout. The immediate vicinity is almost entirely composed of attached dwellings and small motels. Building styles generally resemble architecture from the 1950's and appear to have been progressively expanded. Bay Esplanade, in this general vicinity, is a local street with no sidewalks and many sites rely on the public right-of-way to accommodate perpendicular, back-out parking. Generally, the streetscape is in need of redevelopment to improve parking, pedestrian access, and its aesthetic appearance. The neighborhood is identified in the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as the "Old Florida" District. The Plan identifies this area as a primarily residential neighborhood with limited retail uses that serve local needs. It recommends the redevelopment of the area with single-family dwellings and townhouses. Beach by Design acknowledges that a lack of parking in this area may hinder revitalization of existing improvements, particularly on Bay Esplanade. The Plan continues to suggest that a shared parking strategy should be pursued in order to assist revitalization efforts. The proposal includes converting one building into a single-family dwelling. The eXIstmg building is a two-story structure that houses three dwelling units. The existing building footprint will be expanded by 361 square feet. The building will be completely renovated to create a two- story, Key West-style home with an observation tower atop. The exterior will include wood siding painted in light blue. The building and windows will be trimmed in white. A galvanized metal roof is proposed to finish the Key West-style. Improvements are limited by design. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood construction requirements must be met if the value of the improvements exceeds 50 percent of the value of the structure assessed over a five-year span. The owner intends to pursue future redevelopment of the parcel but prefers a phased approach given economic restraints. The parking configuration will only be slightly changed. Landscaping improvements are proposed in a small area along Bay Esplanade and to the site's interior including giant liriope, hibiscus and a Washingtonian Palm. Five Queen Palms are proposed to the site's rear along the harbor. Page 2 . , The first request is to permit a detached dwelling in the Tourist District where as it is not a permitted use in the district. The site meets the intent of Code to permit multi-family develop- ment. The building could be built to attach to other buildings on site yet is impractical given aesthetic concerns and desires to allow access to the water by other tenants. Additionally, Beach by Design recognizes site constraints of parcels in the neighborhood and difficulties of redevelopment. Staff is supportive of this request since it meets the intent of Code and lessens the site's intensity. The second request is to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 52 feet. The site is irregular in shape (triangle configuration). The lot width, as measured at the setback, is 52 feet while the rear of the site, adjacent to the water, measures in excess of 114 feet. The final requests are to reduce the number of required parking spaces from eight spaces to six spaces and to permit a parking layout other than what is required by Code. Code requires that the site be brought into full compliance with the parking provisions of Section 3-1401 in the event the existing use is improved or remodeled in a value of 25 percent of the existing principal structure. The existing site contains six parking spaces and will provide the same number with this proposal. The parking layout is requested to allow parking to remain in the right-of-way. Staff does not normally support parking in the right-of-way, however, the parking currently exists and will not be expanded. One parking space will be removed to promote better circulation. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: The site has no outstanding code enforcement violations. A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARDS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT WITH A RFH, RESORT FACILITIES HIGH COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: STANDARD PERMITTED! EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? DENSITY 40 Overnight 7 dwelling units 5 dwelling units Yes Accommodations Units per Acre (11 units) or 30 Dwelling units per Acre (8 units) IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.83 0.80 Yes SURFACE RATIO Page 3 . , B. FLEXIBILE DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT: STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 12,144 square 12,144 square Yes minimum feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 110 feet along 110 feet along Yes minimum Edgewater Edgewater Drive; 212 feet Drive; 212 feet along Sunset along Sunset Point Road Point Road HEIGHT N/A 20 feet 34 feet Yes maximum FRONT YARD N/A o feet o feet Yes SETBACK minimum SIDE YARD N/A o feet - north o feet - north Yes SETBACK (4.9 feet to (4.9 feet to minimum building); 0 feet building); 0 feet - south (5 feet to - south (5 feet building) to building) REAR YARD N/A 3 feet 3 feet Yes SETBACK minimum PARKING Determined by 7 spaces * 6 spaces * Yes SPACES the Community minimum Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards (1 space per unit or 5 spaces) * Three parking spaces are located in the adjacent right-of-way and are not considered legal spaces per Code. Page 4 . , C. T, TOURIST DISTRICT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The small lot size precludes all appropriate uses in the Tourist District as part of a Flexible Standard applicant. The location of existing buildings severely restricts options for parking and will most likely result in building demolition. The existing uses are more intensive than what the site can efficiently accommodate per current Code. Approval of this proposal will reduce site's intensity. The detached dwelling, which is not a permitted use in the Tourist District, will result from eliminating two dwelling units from the existing outdated structure. It is impractical to require the applicant to attach an unneeded wall to the adjoining building solely to deem the structure conforming. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The proposal includes reducing the site intensity from seven units to five units. One of the buildings will be redeveloped into a Key West-style house. It is anticipated that the proposal will improve the site as seen from the adjoining street and adjacent properties. Staff does not anticipate any negative financial consequences onto abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; Attached and detached dwellings are permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The adjacent uses include overnight accommodations and attached dwellings. The uses on this site will remain residential and are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The site is uniquely located within a residential area on the barrier islands with direct access to the harbor. The applicant desires to continue to operate an apartment complex with direct views and access to Clearwater Harbor. Given cost constraints, lack of available land on Clearwater Beach, and the applicant's desires, it is seems reasonable to assume other sites are unavailable. Page 5 . , 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The proposal will improve the aesthetic appearance of an existing building that follows the recommendations of Beach by Design. The proposal will reduce the site's intensity by two dwelling units. Landscaping improvements are proposed to the rear of the property. Given the site improvements and reduction in intensity, it is reasonable to assume the proposal will upgrade the immediate vicinity. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The immediate vicinity includes small motel and apartment developments nestled on Clearwater Harbor. Beach by Design identifies the area as the "Old Florida" District which includes the low intensive residential uses. The redevelopment includes Key West- style architecture, a reduction in density and improved landscaping. The proposal is consistent with existing community character and the intended character as addressed in Beach by Design. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; Flexibility in lot width is required to permit any residential redevelopment on this parcel. Additionally, no reasonable redevelopment is permitted without requiring parking to meet the currently Code. A Code-required parking design would require demolition of existing buildings and produce unreasonable cost constraints. Approval of a parking design other than what is required by Code will allow a reduction in site intensity and permit redevelopment of an entire building. The redevelopment proposal will aesthetically enhance the immediate vicinity. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal does not include a mix of uses that would deem the site applicable to the shared parking formula of Code. The requested parking design is requested to accommodate parking need. Though the parking is located partially in the right-of-way, it is not located on the street itself. Page 6 . , D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The adjacent properties are almost entirely paved or covered by buildings. The proposal in consistent with other land development patterns in the neighborhood. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. This site and others in the immediate vicinity seem far more intense than the parcels are able to support. The proposal includes the elimination of two dwelling units to result in a less intensive site. Improvements include the redevelopment of an entire building to reflect the beach character of the neighborhood. This redevelopment proposal may serve as a catalyst for other appropriate improvements in the immediate vicinity. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposal is not expected to adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The use is not considered a large traffic generator. The proposal is less intensive than the existing site and approval of this applicant may actually improve traffic in the area by reducing the number of dwelling units. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate community includes numerous apartments and small motels as part of a waterfront beach neighborhood. Like this site, many of the adjacent sites are fairly intensive in relation to the lot sizes and building coverage. Most of the surrounding sites fail to provide parking layouts as required by Code. Page 7 . , 6. The design of the proposed development mInimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposal reduces the site's intensity by two dwelling units. The proposed improvements to the building will improve the site's appearance. The mere nature of the site is not expected to produce adverse acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts onto adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on March 20, 2001. The proposal includes alternations that will improve the site's function and lessens its intensity. Given economic constraints, complete redevelopment is impractical to the current owner. The development will further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector redevelopment. The proposal is in compliance with the Flexibility Criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Criteria and the recommendations of Beach by Design. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to to permit a detached dwelling as part of a multi-family development, to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, to reduce the number of required parking from eight spaces to six spaces, and to permit a parking design other than what is required by Code, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Development Project at 667 Bay Esplanade, with the following conditions: 1. That any future redevelopment initiatives include a parking design that complies with Code or is approved by the Community Development Board; 2. That it be acknowledged that the parking in the right-of-way is not guaranteed and may cease without notice. "// / c //(~/ Prepared by: W . Ryan Givens /' (/., ~)~1)?d{ ~ / .: L-/ ATTACHMENTS: I /' Aerial Photograph of Site and Vic~ity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending Applications\Edgewater 1919 Edgewater Drive Motel\Edgewater 1919 STAFF REPORT. doc Page 8 - 6291 19 2 rn...= ~ ~~9 4 't 6U ~ ~ ~-.!1~ 6 I O~9 7449l1!1t284 ~J~ ~R~ McKA' PAI8(I~ 604 8.-~ 2 ~..1.!1 606 -<<, , 111 ~ ~~. 21 ~ I ~ANITA WAY~ ~ST UU~ ~ 1=-:2J I 5 189~ n~. ~~676 r 7 8 9 ~ 11_1Q I 21 ~ :U: 668 8 9 11 10 III il ST~ iii 64~ 8 ~9- >- :'\ B4l ~ ~\ 10 Q III i CLW.I 0. --- 11 . ~ S; :2.1 )~ sa: 618 L" 614 ~ 11 10 ~ 21 R:~ ST ~ i ~I~~~ 60 11 ~ ~APRIIIO!IL~I 1&.1 COIOllll 48-07 :) ~ 666 5 14 668 '^ 1~64 ~ 666 2 Z CIl 16660 2 1 ~ ~ I'l CIl...- 19640 T 6'.s; 3 20688 (J-#9 1 -r ~ WAY I 13 6,,1 12 I ~ 11 10 9 8 : ! /~ ESPLANADE ~ 6~ 6( 6:; 60' 1O! \ 11 6f%1 60 ~ 1 6fO 6%110 5 .... (1 ..- 9 ~ riD" CD ~ 4 "O~ 606 1 609 ~ ~ 12608 ~ 6f;1 ~ i lot 2 c: 606 ~ ~ 6fft\! 3 12- en 60rra ~13 06 f- ~ no:. r:....:6 cDf. 600 7- fI# 14 11 3 80' I- ~_~&f ~; :84 1 6866 ~~ E 1i:Q c:; P8 5~ 1 16680 Ii .... u. 681 ~ 2 ~ \1:\ ",i~ 17...1 9 8 7 '" ~ 5i.. ~~ !! 16,,,, 2 6 !Q4 3co CO2 1 ~ "'b o ~ coo "'~ 69%\ 'C7 10 10 lOCO (gq) 698 1 .1 ~ 51 4 66~ .~ 3 7~ 1 \ 689 13 668 8 ~ 687 12 664 -0 685 P~=lR CONDO. ~ PALMS 13-50 = 13 11 664 78-. 678 12 660) 669 8 676 I ~ 1&.1 669 ;:) 10 z ~ ~ "9 I 8~ ~ 1667 7 ~~ 6~~ 12 672 13662 <:( 7 j ~.~~~ \ ~ Y 80'1 2 p--- ,599 1 .JUNUTA ~ WAT \T FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST OWNER: ~tfuel /,4///55111tEtf/r SITE: l;!.Dr:}- G o of" -4>i 6483 ~ .2~ "1 ii ~ ROYAL ~ p , ~ ~ J -1 CASE rt.-r()/....CZ- (l8 PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): p. Z 1- p~ ~ Z'I- /5" - 75& -o77~Ofl70 ATLAS PAGE: 0fJA- e .~~.: e ITEM C - LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS Item #C 1 - 812 Pinellas Street: Thompson Executive Center Partnership Number Two - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 feet to 20 feet along Pinellas Street, reduce from 20 feet the east side setback to five feet, the west side setback to zero feet, and the north rear setback to eight feet, reduce the minimum lot area from 10,000 square feet to 7,492 square feet, and reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 55.5 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Program with a Comprehensive Landscape Program at Lot 13 and south Yzof vacated alley adjoining on the North, Block 10, Milton Park Subdivision. FL 01-02-07 ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 - with conditions: 1) vehicle access to adjacent alley to be prohibited; 2) oak tree in adjacent right-of-way to be preserved prior to & during all construction phases; 3) shared access easement for driveway to be secured and recorded with Pinellas County; 4) all parking to be provided to building's rear & screened from roadway; 5) office building elevations to remain residential in character to include a pitched-roof, front porch, and paned-windows as generally depicted in the submittal; and 6) landscape plan to be amended to include landscaping along north & west property lines. Item #C2 - 2634 Barksdale Court: Winding Wood Condominium X Association/J.C. Dubois - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to increase the height of a fence from four feet to six feet as replacement fencing for outdoor patio areas, as part of a Residentiallnfill Project at Winding Wood Condominium X. FL 01-02-06 ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 - with conditions: 1) plant a three-foot continuous hedge along patio fences near Countryside Boulevard and Winding Wood Drive to improve their appearance as seen from the rights-of-way; 2) augment the hedge along Countryside Boulevard with additional plantings to create a continuous buffer; and 3) repair the split rail fence along Countryside Boulevard as needed. Item #C3 - 667 Bav Esplanade, Units #5, 6, & 7: Kellev Investment & Manaqement Corp./Paul Kellev - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to permit a detached dwelling as part of a multi-family development, to reduce the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, to reduce the number of required parking from eight spaces to six spaces, and to permit a parking design other than what is required by Code, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Development Project at Mandalay Unit No.5 Replat, Blk 77, Lot 7. FL 01-02-08 ACTION - APPROVED 7:0 - with conditions: 1) future redevelopment initiatives to include a parking design that complies with Code or is approved by the Community Development Board and 2) that the applicant acknowledge that parking in the right- of-way is not guaranteed and may cease without notice. acd040 1 3 04/17/01 ,. r-d- - - - ~~ ~l.,'l 6a-, ls-p{~ TCP ftlul (<crt ey) Pvcs. e. c), f3C7( 3"3 -:3 '1 u eavLco.J-e,') c;.L ~ 37 107 pL () !-{)2 -()2 CtJf3 If-/1-0j gj (() J!) 6 r:) CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST APT 3 CLl~~)R~'.)(HEh~ FL 3::)767 1546 VE:F~DAN. STEVE VEV-"BPIN" HELEt.,! ~( .:;,5 SOME:F<SFT ST CL.r~:AFH\)ATER FL. 33767 1546 .JOI--INSON" Fi.OBI?:F~T 55 SOMERSET ST ~ 2 CLEARI^II~TER F;'L 3~376.,7' 1.5~l() DE BELL.IS, BARBARA 55 SOMERSET ST ~ 3 C:LE:~r~v\I{~\TER F"L ::;;~5767 15046 PETI~(;~S" r-i:~~lr-<.GI~F~ET 31 ISLAND WAY ~ 1001 CL..E{~F~v.){\ TF::R FL 3:5767 2207 HESSELSCHWERDT, DERND J HESSELSCHWERDT. BERNHARD 55 SOMERSET ST ~ 5 CL.EPIF<~Ip,IPITER FL. 33767 1.546 PTFtON" EUGEi',IIO P{~Lf"'iA, L.L.ICY 1200 WYNCHGATE ST OAKVILL.E ON L6L 2L.4 -CAN{lD:'-'1 FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC 673 BAY ESPL.ANADE CU::~RI^I(~TH? FL ~S~576 7' 1503 EYLEF?. CYNTH I A 11 HOLDEi"!" DONNA L 5:::,4 ADi:)L I NE PIVE \lPlt'''Di;~L I (.~ OH 45377 NEIL. MARIE-THERESE 4 r;:UE DE S{~IV() I E: PARTS 7500(" r=R{:\NCE RENEGADE INVESTMENTS TNC P 0 80X 1191. OLDSi"il~~F.~ F:L 3.4677 .1.191 BANNON. PATRICK J BANNON" HARY ~( 910 STF.~ATFORD Li',! DOv.Jf"EF<~S GROVE IL 605.16 19.':,1 F-'ENLON" KEL.LY {~ 1563 MISTY PLATEAU TRL CLE:{.;Rv')I!~ TE:Ft FL. ~5:57 65 GARONEF~., RICK G GARDNER. CONNIE J 673 BAY ESPL.ANADE ~ 106 CLE(.~IF~I,^}{~TrEF< FL ~:s () 7 (:, 7' NICKYSVN ENTERPRISES INC 6/3 BAY ESPL.11NDE CL.E::(')F~v.}(~ITEP Fl_ O'CONNEL.L.. PATRICK M 5335 S MCVICKER AVE CHIC:~GO IL :.:; ::~; '7" IS. ~"l 1. .5. () :5 c,()(,;52; 2e~:3:~; BANNON, PATRICK J E~:01j'-'.lNON., ty1{:.\r~Y }<. 910 :STR(~TFOF~D L.N DOv')rlt:G~S Gr~O\lr: I L_ 60.~.16 1951 RHOADS, JEFFREY L TRE PO BOX 861 DI..JNED I N FL 34697 0861 SNO-BIRD PROP INC 7.::j.'.13 HIGH ST YARf.l0UTH i'1E 0409(, 67{:,O EYLER. DON(~LD C EVLE:R" CVt'lTHI~1 A 5.54 ADAL,INE AVE VANDAL l:~ OH 4.5::577 H302 e TILLER USA INC 200 DOLPHIN PT 1 403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 2102 HOLDEN, ROBERT L 12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS DR WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 1.122 JAKSCH, ROBERT W Clo CONLEY, BEATE 7130 NW 166TH ST TRENTON FL 32693 7515 WICKY. JERRY E WICKY, BETTY W 231 LAFAYETTE BLVD OLDSMAR FL 34677 3754 HINES. WILLIAM HINES, ANNETTE 699 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1506 GRASSO. JOSEPH F GRASSO. NICKOLAS 30 TURNER ST 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33756 5258 R J 62236 2816 WILCOX, DAVID C OGILVIE. SCOTT 28 SANIBEL DR FAIRPORT NY 14450 8619 KELLY INV & MGMT CORP PO BOX :3339 CLEARWATER FL 33767 8339 HOPKINS. JEANNE 685 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1503 GALLAGHER, WILLIAM GALLAGHER, ELEANOR S 153 77TH ST BROOKLYN NY 11209 2903 WASELEWSKI. WILLIAM S WASELEWSKI. MARGARET L 627 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1617 e 1 403 lUNDElL. ROBERT LUNDELL. JANE POBOX 19185 AVON CO 81620 I 403 MELTON. MICHAEL K MELTON. DALE W 3043 KEVLYN CT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 5215 JACKSON. LANNY R JACKSON, VICKI J 1502 MULE RD COLUMBIA IL 622:36 2816 BEACH & GULF SANDS INC 657 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1.515 FERGUSON. MELODIE A PENNOCK, ROBERT M 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1598 / FRANKS. VIRGINIA B 669 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1503 MOULIS. JAMES M CIO JUREWICZ~ JAN 689 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1503 COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 1826 HARDISON. KEITH TRE DANTY REALTY TRUST I 629 629 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1617 e e HPIYE:S" EDG,~F~ P 519 UNIVERSITY DR ,J~ICK,SON'v'IL,l_E: NC COI~TES I II"',!(: 81~) I S'_~lt"~D 1/'){lY CL"EI~I~(~,Ir:~TER FL. 3:371~~ 7' 18:?,S :2~3.54(~ '7.5:2~7 t1EYEF~. EF~I"~ST i'1E'y'EF,:. CiEF::Tr:;~l)DE: 7287 MAIDENCANE CT L.f~F;':CO FL, THURMOND. WILLIAM H THURMOND. CAROL H 643 BAY ESPLANADE CL,E{lF?~',Jf~TE:R FI_ ~52;7l7 4900 ~5~57(;l '? DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC 647 BAY ESPLANADE CL.EI~~R(/~I~ TEF~ FL 7;~)7(~,7 1617 PRESTON. MICHAEL G TRE 419 EASTSHORE DR CL.EAR\~JA TER FL 33767 DE BENEDITTIS. FRANK DE BENEDITTIS. NANCY lj.('S,02 104 TH ST CC)F~Oh!(~ HV 11368 2812,; AL I SON. EMi"iA F 644 BAY ESPLANADE ~ 2 CLEAF;~(i,I(;~ TER P'L ::S3767 1501. RAUBESOH. CHARLES F PO [:0)( 2;;67 L.AF<~C~O Fl_ ~~; :5 '., "7 '9 PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC 661 POINSETTIA AVE CL.EAR(~JI'~ TE:::R FL. 33767 1561 FITZGERAL.D. RONALD 665 POINSETTIA AVE CLEriF<(i.,I(.iTEF!. I:::-L. ':''::'~'(O:::''''Ct' ',,,,;I..,} I I...) l 1:; 3 () DOt.,!. ["1AF!.Y 65 SDr'1EF<:SET ST CL.E(-iR(^){~lTE~R FL. 33767 1547 N I CHOL(.~IS. ,]E:RF~~Y C;O PAPPAS. BETSV 3002 STRAWBERRY RD ~OFC P(~ISAOEt'J,A T:>< FRANKS. VIRGINIA B 669 BAY E:SPLANADE CL.EAR(/.JI~TER FL. 77502 5248 ~Y:S767 1.:;.03 FF!.ANKq. VIF!.PINIA B ", "9~~A E"";)I r.>16eE .::::>6, ... t"1 ' _ "',..:, 1'11'10-1) .:. eLE, I -' Fl_ 3~)7' '1 1..~~,()<S KOEGLEF!.. WAL.TER A K,OEGL.EF!.. .JE{..lt'-1 135 BRIGHTWATER DR CL.E:{lF~I,oI,I(~TEF~ FL ?;3767 2402 COQI.) I I'-J,A l'iPT:S I NC 692 BAY ESPLANADE CLE:I~HI,,'.J{~ TEP FL.. :::~; ~3 ~/ 6. '7 .1 !~l () () LEWINSKI, WO.JCIECH LE~I,I I HSf<. I, H(~HNr-l 60 SOMEF!.SET ST ~ 3 CU;:Ar~~\J~ITER F'L 3?S76~ 7" 15.4~3 CZIPRI. BRENDA K THE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 CZIPHI. BRENDA K TRE 334, :.:~ S~ li~:' RD STE 338 PI~~L,;,i '(.~~M~ FL ?;4( J~: 2,::127 Pr~Lr'l HAPE30P F"L, 2)t:1-(~85:~ :2.4:2"'7 P,~L.i"l TF!.E STE S::')8 DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 475 FENM~IR DR NOF!.TH YOF!.K ON M9L 2R6 -CI~INAD(.:I ~;4IS8... }. N\ /I'~'S;TI.1E::-I.JT'<::; I N(':; 0' ,0'" I ,"I, ".' - I~~ 'I.(:)l "'R" 9k) 1'1., " ,'~. () DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 475ift":", ...~~ 't':;1 > 1()F:'t"r' I) U I., M"1L ?'~' J'~" <. 'f' _ "\ f . 1'\ ~~. ...I"l; 6 CnN ,), e TNC SPERELAKIS. NICHOLAS SR SPERELAKIS. DOLORES J 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR C It',,! C J r,! 1'1 (;~I T 1: 01--.1 45249 1.~:530 BEKIARIDES. KATHERINE ,l.,::.() CHF':: 1 Sf 1 E ~;;T LEO r',! I (~I i",J, <1 07605 1902 SMITH. RUPERT W <1R Sr'i J TH. 1 REr-"IE \/ 661 POINSETTIA AYE # 106 CL,E(~IR(.I,I~~T[::R FL 2;37() 7' J..53;~'l FOL_EY. DOr'~(iL,D r.:: FOLEY. CATHERINE G 661 POINSETTIA AYE # 108 CLE{:::F~I.^)?)TER F'L :::) ~5 ~7 C;t ~l 1~ 534 MONTGOMERY. ROBERT 2300 N HARLEM AYE # 804 ELi"i~,.IOO[) F'ARK I L 6.0'707 27'20 BEARDSLEY. <1AMES M 15 r'ltlYF ~~ I R L.N BUFF'I~LO t',IY 14201 1522 MC FADDEN. ARLENE S MC FADDEN. ROBERT G 661 POINSETTIA AYE #204 CLEt)f~ll\I~~TE:R FL 2:)~~~l6 7' :l.~53.5 THOMPSON. MICHAEL S THOr'iPSON., r'i(~Ir.:~ I PI BRENDON FEN POND RD IGTHEHM r',,!E~~IR SEVEN OAK,S _KENT TN1.5 9-JE 6f?"c:..~T SRI A I .":',ne-".T' Dn'T''T',^,T~_1 '.......--/, '\ Trr/N or-::VIS. J'(if'iES G 661 POINSETTIA AYE ~ 208 CLEI~~f?\/J(~TEF~ I:::L ~:;Z;7'6}' 1.5:::;5 MC KINNEY. CARMELLA C 661 POINSETTIA AYE ~ 210 CLEAR\',)~~TER FL ::5 :3; '7 6"7l J.. .53..':,.. WOSCHIT7. EVA TRE 302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST 10 COURT(I.)O()O PL TORONTO ON M2K 179 .... C~IN~~DI~~ e SPEJih: ,. ROBEFH' E: 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT HENOERSONYILLE NC 28791 139(, PASQUALE. -JACK R TRE PASQUALE. PATRICIA A TRE 1.4:::)3 NORf"h'~N DR DrrR I Er~ I L (';,0561 4,43..;.1 SPEFi:ELAK IS. 4524'"7' 13~::;0 HILDEBRAND. WILLIAM 0 -JR 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 107 CLE~~RW~", TER F'L 33767 1534 BRIGGS. PHILOMENA V Fm 4 ROCKWOOD ON NOB 2KO ..... CI~N(:)D{4 KI~AUS~3 8:. CO INC 100 WAVERLY WAY # 308 CLEr-")R\/,JA TER FL ::':;;:37" .5. C) ~~I () f~ 9 BERETA. STANLEY 0 TRE 661 POINSETTIA AVE I 203 CLEARIA'ATER FL ~;~:)767' 1535 ST I ME., Fi~OBE:RT ST I r"iE. r'iERF~Y 1.,180 i'-,! SHOF.:E: Of';?, ROSIAlE:L.L Gt) 3007/50 281.2 GEOMAR HOLDINGS INC 5~3e LAG~",CE DORVAL PO H9S 2M3 ..",.. CANAD(..\ ~",r;~f1BI~USTER" .JOHN 661 POINSETTIA AVE I 209 CLEARV.)() TER FL 33'767' lS~;5 MOSSER, RICHARD S 661 POINSETTIA AYE # 301 CLl:::I~R\I,J(;\TER FL ~~~; 3 7 c;.7 1::, ~-S 6 HENDERSON. AUDREY 661 POINSETTIA AVE CL_EAF~~.JI0j TER FL 33'167 e e READER. JAMES D READER. HELENE C 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304 CLEARWATER FL LETOURNEAU. WILLIAM T HIRSCH. DEBORA A 395 16TH ST NEWPORT MN 33767 1536 55055 1061 LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI. HANNA 661 POINSETTIA AVE ~ 306 CLEARWATER FL MAVITY. LEON L 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 1537 33767 1537 KIELMANN. LOTHAR F KIELMANN. WENDY 35154 LEON ST LIVONIA MI WHITE. THOMAS J WHITE. EDITH P 14 HEATHERWOOD DR MARLBOROUGH MA 01752 48150 2668 ROZENITS. FRED ROZENITS. ANNA 31 ISLAND WAY # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 2207 - e ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, April 17, 2001, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: 1. (cont. from 03120/01) Dayton Andrews. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit vehicle sales and display in the Commercial District with the following requests as part of a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project: 1) To reduce the lot area from 40,000 sq ft to 32,929 sq ft; 2) To reduce the lot width from 200 ft to 100 ft; 3) To permit vehicle display within the required front setbacks along Gulf to Bay Blvd. and Fernwood Ave. (Flexible Standard Development criteria - Section 2-704 T3); 4) To permit vehicle sales and display on a lot contiguous to property designated as residential in the zoning atlas; 5) To permit vehicle sales and display on a lot with less than 7,000 sq ft of enclosed building (Flexible Standard Development criteria - Section 2-703 Tl); 6) To permit vehicle sales and display outside of an enclosed building (Flexible Development criteria - Section 2-704 R3); 7) To reduce in required parking spaces from 77 spaces (2.5 spaces/1000 sq ft of land area) to 5 spaces; 8) To permit a reduction in landscape buffer from 15 ft to 7.5 ft on Gulf to Bay Blvd; and 9) To permit a reduction in landscape buffer from 15 ft to zero ft on Fernwood Ave. at 2394 Gulf to Bay Blvd., Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 24.07. FL 01-01-03 2. Ronald W. & Laurie E. Anderson are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the side (south) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft, reduce the front (west) setback along Eagle Trail from 20 ft to 8 ft, and permit a chain link fence and 6 ft brick wall in the front setback along Eagle Trail, as part of a Residential Intill Project at 2988 Eae:le Estates Cir. E., Eagle Estates, Lot 59. FL 01-02-11 3. Windine: Wood Condominium X / J.C. Dubois are requesting a flexible development approval to increase the height of patio fencing from 4 ft to 6 ft as part of a Residential Intill Project at 2634 Barkdale Ct., Winding Wood Condominium X. FL 01-02-06 4. Kelley Investment & Manae:ement Corp. / Paul Kelley are requesting a flexible development approval of a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 8 spaces to 6 spaces, approval of a parking lot layout from what is otherwise required by Code and a reduction in the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 56 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Comprehensive Landscape Program at 667 Bay Esplanade. Unit #5.6. and 7, Mandalay Unit No.5 Replat, Blk 77, Lot 7. FL 01-02-08 5. PACT. Inc. / City of Clearwater are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the expansion of an indoor recreation/entertainment use, and reduce the side (west) setback from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at 1111 McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 09-29-16, M&B 24.03 & 24.04. FL 01-02-10 6. K. B. Investment Group. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings in the LMDR District within more than two buildings, on a lot which was not vacant as of the date of the adoption of the Community Development Code and is not a corner lot, as part of a Residential Intill Project at 7 S. McMullen Booth Rd., Sec. 16-29-16, M&B 21.09. FL 00-11-53 7. Charles W. Hamrick. Dorothy E. Hamrick. Richard L. Kamensky. TRE & Elizabeth Plecker (Sun Ketch Construction / Tom Quareteti, V.P.) are requesting a flexible development approval, as part of a Residential Infill Project, to permit attached dwelling in the LMDR District within more than two buildings, on a lot that was not vacant on the date of the adoption of the Code, with a reduction in front setbacks (along the two, internal, private roads) from 25 ft to 21 ft, reduction in rear setback (internal property lines only) from 15 ft to 13 ft, reduction in the side setbacks (internal property lines only) from 10 ft to 8.5 ft, and reduction in side setbacks from 10 ft to zero ft for common wall construction for all buildings at 1601 E. Druid Rd., Sec. 14-29-15, M&B 43.10, 43.11, 43.12, and 43.16. FL 00-11-60 / PLT 00-11-05 e e , 8. Thompson Executive Center Partnership Number Two are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the front setback from 25 ft to 20 ft, reduce the side (east) setback from 20 ft to 5 ft, reduce the side (west) setback from 20 ft to zero ft and to reduce the rear setback from 20 ft to 8 ft, reduce the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 7,492 sq ft, and reduce the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 55.5 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Program with a Comprehensive Landscape Program at 812 PinelIas St., Milton Park, Blk 10, Lot 13 and South 1/2 of vacated alley adjoining on the North. FL 01-02-07 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567. Lisa Fierce Planning Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 03/31/01 12. Could make the spaces 10 foot wi~stead of 9 feet, then the back out dimensiotAJld be reduced by 2 feet from 43 feet to 41 feet; . . 13. No engineering work has been provided for this site; need to do a percolation test with infilltromiter 14. Can reduce the parking requirement a part of this request, minimum required spaces is four spaces for this use; 15. Few customers expected for this use (law office); 16. May need to remove two oak trees at the north west comer of the site to accommodate the driveway 17. Reduction in driveway width and 18. Minimum design criteria needed is for a 50-year storm -per Bob Maran 19. Concern about impact on tree in front of building - prefer to use existing driveway - if not - cannot make any changes to driveway from what is shown on the plan 20. Mr Thompson questioned the viability of the development - and whether a residential use would work. 21. could potentially make it for may CDB meeting for the site plan case and move the LUZ case on ahead of this. Staff would prefer that this comes back to the DRC meeting if the site plan changes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3:30 p.m. Case: FL 01-02-08 - 667 Bay Espanade Owner/Applicant: Kelley Investment & Management Location: 0.27 acres located on the east side of Bay Esplanade Atlas Page: 258A Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a detached dwelling, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, as part of a multi-family development with a reduction in required parking from xx to yy. Proposed Use: A 3,717 square foot, two-story, single-family dwelling. Presenter: W. Ryan Givens, Planner. Mr Kelley attended the meeting. The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. no solid waste issues 2. no land resource issues 3. don't support parking spaces in the right of way - city cannot recognize the spaces as approved, required parking - as per traffic operations engineer 4. the spaces in the right of way are striped 5. no handicap parking requirement for single family - per Mike Gust 6. need landscaping done prior to final building inspection 7. need landscaping plan revised with caliper/size and species 8. the parking requirement needs to be met because the value of the improvement is greater than 25 percent 9. converting from a three-unit to a single-unit building; overall currently 7 units on site (reducing to five units overall) 10. need comprehensive infill redevelopment project criteria - need general applicability 11. discuss the desire to preserve the two units that he will be giving up; 12. he want to upgrade the other buildings on the site over time; he recognizes the need to raze those buildings 13. need 15 sets of all revised information by Monday, March 19,2001 to be reviewed by the CDB on April 17, 2001 4:00 p.m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Case: FL 01-02-10- 1111 McMullen Booth Road Owners: PACT, Inc and City of Clearwater. Applicant: PACT, Inc. Location: 41 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road, approximately 1,350 feet north of San Bernadino Street Street. Atlas Page: 274 A and B Zoning: I, Institutional District. DRC action agenda - 3/15/01 - Page 8