FL01-08-26
.....-
#
~
.
.-
o
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF: THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
CASE #: r["O~-o6' Z6
DATE RECEIVED: 13"'~ i'd!
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ~
ATLAS PAGE #: z.6 7~
ZONING DISTRICT: f)1 HPC-
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: e;rl
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORT~H. H.;z:.
SOUTH: lit-
WEST:
EAST:
>-
:::~
o~
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project (Revised 3/29/01)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
AUG 2 3 200f
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-
L..J
CITY~?8r~~~~,lSVCS
APPLICANT NAME: Rocrer Larson, Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns
MAILING ADDRESS:
911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, Florida 33757
PHONE NUMBER:
(727) 461..1818
FAX NUMBER: (72]) 44l..8617
PROPERTYOWNER(S): Houle Industries, Inc., 531 Corrmerce Drive, Largo, FL 33709
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME: Robert Pergolizzi-, AICP
Fl (jri oQ DP.!": i gn ('.on!":]] 1 t-;mt-!": . Tnr.
MAILING ADDRESS: 2639 McCormick Drive, Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 724-8422
FAX NUMBER: ( 727) 724-8606
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS:
N/A Vacant Property
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
T nt-!": ] n i'lnilll. TTnit- "'..]I.., Tc:: 1 Qnil F.c::tQh=>c:: or rl Pi'ln'l~t-pr
PARCEL NUMBER:
08/29/15/43398/000/0100 and 08/29/15/43398/000/0110
PARCEL SIZE:
16,000 s.f. (0.37 Acres)
(acres, square feet)
11 Condominium Units
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Variation to minimum lot width. setbaC'..k..c:;, height
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes. attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
k 0 A J1/ l c.r7 Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it s
located. ph' , h al d" b 'ldi f wh'ch ul '
Dol ln POlnt as sever con amnll.lIn Ulngs, many 0 1 are ill tl.,..story.
The Dolphin Cove oondaninium is eleven stories, the Isle of Clearwater oondaninium is
five stories and other buildings on the street are two stories and three stories. All
properties are IlEdium or high density residential.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. Adjacent properties appear to be fully developed. Develop:rent of
the property with upscale condaninium units would tend to irrprove property values
and may enoourage upgrading of np-amy proflPrti p!=:
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
The health and safety of residents in the neighborhooO will not- hP- FloVP1:"!=:p-l y
affected. Parkinq will be at ground level and all living arp-ac; will hp- p-l eVi'lt-ffi on
on the seoond throuqh :.fift-h" floors.
4. The proposed development is cfesigned"""IOlTlinimize traffic congestion.
Eleven oondaninium units would generate 6A daily '€hicle trips according to I'lli
Trip Generation, 6th Edition. This is minimal.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The corrmunity oonsists of several condominium develop:rents ranging from two
stories to eleven stories.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts.
on adjacent properties.
The design is sensitive to surroundinq properties and minimizes adverse effects.
o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
The property has 125 feet of frontage (lot width) whereas the minimum requirerrent
is 150 feet, therefore, lot width, setback and height deviations are necessary
and the Residential Infill criteria should be applied.
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residential I nfi II Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
According to the Pinf'!ll~!=: C'rmnty Propprty AppriJis~rl' t-np pX;'sHng Vi'lC'Ant- l;mi! \T~hlP
is approxima.tely ~243,OOO, whereas the applicant esti'Jnc:ltes the i'nprrnrpd VAlue tn be
$3 million. 'Ih.is improverrent is expected to improve values in the neighborhood.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Condominimums. ("attached dwellings I aT!"! ~. PPTQJ;t-t-Pi! 118P ~;.t-n j Tl t-hp 1~ 7011E'
in the City of Clearwater.
.
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
The underlyi~land 1l!,;"!"! j'!=: 'Rps1'(lpnH.f1,l H!<Jipe;r.- the Counf}'w; dP F'lltllr!"! T ,;mil IJ!=:P Pl ~n
which pennits 30 units per acre and the current zoninq is ~~dium High Densit;y
Residential (MHDRl which pennits attached dwell.:inqs. Adjaq(?I1t land uses include
condcminiums ranging fran two stories to eleven stories.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
~oposed for development
The existinq properq is the only vaC'..l'Int pdrCE 1 on t-hp !=:t-rppt-, ~TP 1 ~lli- nf thj::>
property with upscale condominiums_will ~i'lilp tnp . ~j"Ai-P llj::>ijh~ and
and increase the property 'Value and overall appP~r;mC'P
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the COOlmunity character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The desiqn a::mplies with current building coa!"! rf'!<Jll;rP111Pnb:; ~!=: ~11 h~h;t-~hlp floors
will be elevated and parkinq will occupy' th~ground floor. The propos,al inc]T1C1P!':r
attractive architecture~.landscapinq, and will provide open views- of the water. It is
.l.n character wi th surroUn~ uses.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to COOlmunity character and the
iulmediflte vi.cinity Qf the par;cel ~s~ for ~evelopmeJ]t and the City of Oearwater as a whole. . . .
lJUe to me .lot Slze .l.t .l.S llllPractical to rreet standard setbacks, helght, and mmrrn1lll
lot width and provide for desired parkinq for a reasonable densi tv that is consistent
wi th the land use plan and surrounding uses. 'Ihis is in character with the ccmnuni ty.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COPY OF RECORDED PliAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT,cas required;
XI{ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
XI{ GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
-i-
...x...
..x.
*
X-
X
--X-
-X...
X
--X-
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
1
-X...
=f
lL
2a SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
...x-
X
i-
i-
f-
...x-
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
~
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible;
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: (NOT APPLICABLE)
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a .certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
o
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
)tx:
.x.
t
X
t-
i-
JL
1L
X
~
~
o
lANDSCAPE PlAN:
Nt existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
. Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site. by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location. size, description. specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including instructions, SOIl mixes. backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PlAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) (color rendering If possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE lANDSCAPE PROGRAM application. as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a ComPrehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
XI{ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of builcfmg wiih colors and materials to scale (8 Yz X 11) (black and white and color rendering, If
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11 ) (color). If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
NjA
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) .
N/A
o Include as required if proposed development will d~rade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requiremenl
K. SIGNATURE:
I. the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS , d
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and ~and subscribed before me this ~ O..t.(. day of
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property . . A.D. 20M to me ~nr1LD!... by
described in this application. ( "Nt 'J" Hptx. t.e ,r".. who is ~rsonagy ~~ has
~ .,// /7 .I /. produced as
flT~ ~ I~ identification.
_hKe.1 perty.ti..oo~.'e U ~ ~
HOOIE INDUSTRIES, INC. My com NarARYSEAL
. BY: Willia'll Houle, Jr. DANIEL W STEEG
NorARY PUBUC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMlSSION NO. CC638622
M;YCOMMJ ,ION EXP. APR. 26,2001
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill ProJeCt':..aty'Clf ClealWater
.
.
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Houle Industries, Inc.
531 Camerce Drive, Larqo, FL 33709
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s} and record tiDe hoIder(s} of the following described ~ (address or general location):
lots 10 and 11, Unit 5-A, Island Estates of Clearwater
2. That this property oonstitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Residential Infill
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (doesIdo) appoint: Mr. Roger Larson and Mr. Robert PeDJolizzi
as (hislthelr) agent(s} to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of C1eafW8ter. Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That(...~the_a_.hereby_....the_..b~~ ~_
p o-H. ~
Property Owner .. , , :
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINElLAS
r ma the -- an offioer duly com""""'" by the laws <I... stata of Florida, on ... :20 Ii day <I
..... Q.. - · ;ZOO ( ........, _ ",,,,. C II. (A. Le: orA . who ha""'" ~
--- and sa,.. ..., """"" fully ......Iand, the - of... affida"'lhal """'(W
~~~~~ ~~-
DANIEL WSTEEG ~ ;.
My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBUC srATE OF FLORlDA ~ta~ ~
COMML'3SION NO. CC638622
MY COMMISSION EXP. APR. 26,2001 .or
, ..
C:'Documents and Settings'esterling'J..ocal SettingslTemporary Internet F/les\OLK5'vesldentiallnfiH application2.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
06-05-01
10:52am
.. f.~~OHNSON~~~
~. .
+7274418617
-
.
T-016
P.OZl02
F-486
-
~~~
4.QO
CIO.OC
.. _.....,.
~ ..........11.( '8 ,(~.'tOA
80J.Ji~ti73
o.p..508~ net 7 3
This Ulatnnlu Blm M...I.. ",.. 31lt" ,I~y ..J S~l"trmbc:r
ilOlISTOIl RAY -A'ODGfS a/ld IlAOElY!l~( o. ljOoc;(S. 'his w\f~
1:',,.;,,~I1,'r ....11...1 ,I.,- I.....~I.,...... tlQUI.E IIlIllJS'l'R1E.S, lHC.
A. /). ,., 80 I."
" nl".."fIl;UH .-\i...l'''!I .-,l",p ,',r Iw.... "I tIki' S...lr ..{
"J,I,..., '"~ zoo Cll/lIIrrcl!! ~hc. Largo. Fl.
1.,,.;...,/1.., (,,/l..4 II" """,I,,: .
Flllr1 dOl
JJ".O
. '."f/4 il" ,)rl...,.~ ~/d/'~
.,-~f"l"" ,."",. --- .... ,- ,.~_.. I" ............ ~.... .. ..... _m ... ,t.,;. --......__ ~
.... ~ ........ ................" ... ...... ... ~....... .... ,..... ....,..-. ....., .-;..~ .... .....,.-.
Witnesseth: TI,.."I,.. "...~r. (Of' A",II" "'..:iJ...../..... .( I~" ~u.... 'ftl i 10.00 . ..., .,,-
...1..,.1./, NM.<f"I,.,~I~.... .....ri.., """,...1 ir 1..."1.,, ....'_.Irff~. 1._LII .......... J......,.... ,.It.. J/~. ....
,..;,1,. ...I......r. "'"....,.. ...Il ~."/"- "",- ,4. !I.....Jc.... ..U 110./' oM_1ft "'.." ."...,.. ,.. I'i nell lis
C6IJ"'~. Fl.,;J... I"'~;
Lilts 1Q Ind 11. UHIT 5-A, ISLAND EST~TE's OF CUARWo\TEIt. lC~Qrd1~ ~ ~
111411 or pht the~l)f u recordl!d in Plu BoGie. 60, Pll!ll: 51. Public; RlIcord$
of 'ine11~s toUA~. Fll)rfda.
~Il QJ
.0 8,.:;. <--I, ~. q
'1 liS "7p~~
Oil!:
'1..-& 7~.;t.;';~
,,-
SYb.kc:~ ~D the
SubJ~C=I: ~I) the
L';--:
..-" :'I"-:-=;-~~(.~ ~
. ~ .
. - .-
.; . ._~ . "-":-
\ ",,~ ; fJ n. rr n
r~~r;ctioft$ A~ 1!!45~ft~ of reC=Drd..
~.Il:: for tile )ear 191Jj] ,no tl\crelfter.
TDgrthtt 14-i,', nil .r... ,...w"'....... '-.Ii'n......,. "'~, n,.'''''''"''....... '1.......n /",'....1"" _ I.. _,.
.."t.- ."fW"'ttl,~...".
Ie Haut IRA lJ HDld. ,1..,._ ;..lr.II...,./. (......~.
I
, &ut,/,r "",,<1m- J....rl.... ........14..'. ...ill, '.aM "....,.. lion' 11" (1''''''0' ,. '..~i uU,........4 -I .-/.<l !..~
I.. I.... .,...,.1.: ./.., II... ",....,... I.. ~....ll/H~I ....ll...../,,' "",/_.., ,.. ,.11 .....1 ,......, rp .eHl ~; ,I... ,,,-
II..."'.... 1..".{... (..I/y .........IU ,,,. 1111. ,.. ..."II."J .....1 ....11 .1.1....,1 .~.. 'n..... 101,,,1"1' II". 1_1../ ~.... .(
.n ,...."..,,0: H"'\""~+": -'01 ,1..-, Hf;.r 1.".4 ;, (,....,. _I ~U ~'H""ttwl,..,.,. ,..n-",' 'fC~"JI M'I"W'.,.... aul..",,"...,
I.' 1)...,....I.~r ~,. I" 7g.
';I!:"~ ~~:: .;. ,':
....1.----.,.. r~_...
'LU;& 'u(~ull "J .'.;
I J. . -...:..... - .
Ol:t I 10 57 aH '10
:.r
In Witness 1ffhtrro(,. II.~ ...i,' p<wnl'" ~.r I'~"'''~l'' .rll;lItfl- ""n" M"" ..../'h.. J"l<' -.A'1t'A'
~~~I ":~'''~.;~~HlJ'''''?/Y'-r;
-'~.. ~..~~~~._,-
.I:j ..~-. :<....\ "..~.. . ...
. "~.W:l('......m _'3~.Y."....___._.....
.//~~.. ~~
.~~-.. .... ~= - . ,~...
. 1'OIJstGfl i1 N;I S
~~ ~ i'~~'ir. D..
~
~r""I'T. Ill' n.H~IPo1.
UJl':-.'T\' IW ";~lh5
, H~J.n,' C!.l.'l'lf'l' .11.0. .n ,~.. ...... k4- ...... OR
rtlt/it..... J",lr .au,lt..,il'd in (tu- ~.... 3'..........c ~"4 tft Ih. ~"'., a(~14 ,. "'~. "4"~~~"I.. ~... _....."....
i. :.;
. HauS;I:Qn .~y !lodges 'lid P1ad.1Y"I\~ D. ~dlle5
.. .... \....... .. ... ...... ...- S. .I.-,~ ill' "'"... "...... ..._....~ ..... r............ i.....,...K." ..~
~ -...... l:"IIY.....-"'lI... u_
.- ".~~..... M,. I..... .u-aft.l ......1 l~ IW ~~,.. .tMf Sai,,,. I.lu aI.nOr ~
'~i'~..~ '. s...p1:...'\o, P. It SO
." .. ....,~...
foll_,Y
.. .....--lnI-.N
30Ui
.wro(
~/:::. .,. ,.? ,
...............~~--tl ~.
;;",....
i..:La.rr'..........-;;::.I.,..:.-=.- .;. .,: -: . ..; ~
~~~~~"'k_=':'"'!..:...L...~~
rile.
L
06/05/2001 TUE 10:50
[TX/RX NO 9414] [4]002
. Cl'J'Y OF CLEAljWATER
AF.li'IDA VIT TO AUTHd!lrIzE AGENT
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BunnING, 100 SOU1H MYRTLE AVENUE, 2M FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
HOUlE INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Name off all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION: IDts 10 & 11, Unit 5-A, Island Estates of Clearwater, Florida.
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Req.uest for Flexible Develqpm:>nt ~plication. residential infill project and for
the creation of docks lying south of the sea\.vall abutting the property.
(Nature of request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint Rocrer A. Larson and
Robert Pergolizzi
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5.
rity, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY O~NELLAS
Sworn to an subscribed before me this :2 () day of
J A.D., 111 20{) / to me and/or
by M . J, 'hLov CL!:' v--'J , who([s persona!!V
/'KflownlJas produced
as identification.
SIGNED (Property Owner)
SIGNED (Property Owner)
Notary public,
My commission expires:
CIAL N J\RYSEAL
DANIEL W STEEG
NOI'AlY PUBUC Sf ATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC638622
MY COMMISSION EXP. APR. 26~1
SIGNED (Property Owner)
OJtAlftAOf; CALCUlAllONS
N
~
SIlE ARtA ~ lj.". ~
16.100 y- X 0.062S' .. 1.006,2~ cr
SW.....[ "'" .. 420 CF
SWAL[ "9" .. 320 cr
SWAl[ .C. .. ..0 CF"
~
(PRO~OE:O)
,-------.......,
//' '\
,
to 10
stenQN -A~
~~
\
SECTION -S-
P' [XISTIIIIG loIElAl POles
~~~o"".o~o
........
SECTION ~C-
StGHT TRIANGLE
"'~~
^''''~"
!
I
,
f
f
!
t ::::: ~.~;~~~~
! ..
~ FL9~~~. ~~~~~.~~g~~~~!:~~I~.!NC.
C hI, (7HI ?r~.'~U . r... (1l7)1I4.UCI
ROGER LARSON
EI.J.........er..elJ,p'.'..e....,"..............,l".....
,IICtl..I...I$I...t
Cln....... '1..;4. 33757
TEL (727) -'fil,I'.' rAX (727) ."I.tiI7
r----~O"-
I
I
I
.1
P
I
-----()-----..,
I
......n_'_~'[
COOlCI'IUUI(~)
I.
".
C\.EolfIAOfC(YlIl I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
, I
'"
ii
00
OUMPSTtR ENClOSUR[
el#!
, !.ti\~~~~~r~~*~.'
I. OC_-.,..,JC.rco_OIIOof<:frl...OIY'IIcu:.....,U
, ~1i:aK~='L~'l1.l1~r..",=,r.lL,";".:"
. E.l'~~:'StlJ1ft1f::Da1:t~~
i ~~:::~:~=:~~~:.":~
"~~""=-"r"IU""_IlD.'" "'lo.......-........
:: ;t;.~:~..;~,z::;::;~;::.;.:';;::=:,,, '"'
Il !.t:u:r:::.:=. --.. 11.........-... OIY, w-IP
'. .._......,~_......_1Ht__.....~1IO"'...
.._._..J~IOoIIC..e~'Ii..IP""""....._J,OO
" __,.ft.,,-"C'O_,........'!aI.'....COII__....
11.........'U_..TIi.OU....CQ.lJIIC..TOt_.1>lE-.-
LAND" ~TA
'11(.)
,It(J)
.'~Ii'~
,''''
"""
-
1\1..-",,(.
..IOCOI())
'-'~('l
_(M'JT.I~IJ
t1"._)l')
"j-'
'0' <-IT) ,.. (UIT)
,. (IOU"',
.W'1.l.
._ LO' __.....-
.cr~"lII>'lMocvu.'UlI~
lIImI
..)....'_TOLOT"'O..._""_.
(I) ..- 11.0.,_ 0$ " n
:~o.::.oo,:,.~~.'=.:~ ~1J'''''-IOI:....~ ..n:fQ.
lJ) ItTeOCICl_ __ "'._1'10 LOT._ _.m..___
(4'.__TOInWOCO_ocno.
GRA Y DOLPHIN CONDOMINIUMS
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
.,.
~.
"'..,.,....(lIoI,l)
11(....)
~
[). . I....., """''''IOf'fd.''I)
.I"'_"mo(~",,,,,")
...._O..TlII........
..
);C --....-.."
---.-...._OCII\OO'OIIlC1lllll
~"_......,.-
".":> .1.._..,'I'rw,1IIlIl
I
.
1
,
i
I
i
!
I
!
!
,
i
l
I
.
I
I
~~~
i
3 I
"'-0
0..,-.-,,-...
10 ....-.."'~_.ocn
U "'CI",,"'
",,"OCIIK_
:e: ._.m'"._ ..-.
".'101
N
~
,...-------.....,
,'/' '\
--
--
SIGHT TRIANGLE
"'-,;:
-1''''_ i'
I ~ ~,;~~~i~
i~
fn FLq!!~~, ~?~Ig~'.:~~~~~~f~"!l~!.fNc.
C To', nUl 11....U.~... (lf111l'.liCIi
ROGER LARSON
e/. "."",..., II""" ~".. ....1', ~..,,,.. a 1111"" ~.A.
",(10.'.....'$1...'
Ct.....l... "I,.i". 11751
TEL (1'lJ?) ..St.,," 'AX (721) 4'U."'7
I a...-_~
.. 1IO(_~"'llCC_nl:l\oWI..ma..IlJfOW10Clll..,_..1'IC.._...
..,_Mu,n. ,.._tIIoII.lIltU'K.""'.IlOT~lO.llC__lII'.....1'\,UI1
l=t.~t~$::~:::5~..:~
fIMl."""'IIIIIIX..IM[_._IHt~I7/IU.__.u......M'"O'
I. !IC_Wlll.rw.'~...,_IIII:IlWD'A-.Ilfl-...1UI_1.
ILrC__'.MlI01"'1I1""C10~""__.worotilQ.".Jt.
:-'1OA':: ~::co:.:..- IIII'[ OIl: Co<Ill. '....m-m.... TO,.,
III( (VOWC"lS --'1,. __,.. _ KltIllIMlI r~rn I" ",.._
"'A.Ml."_"'''llC_tliIUl,...,",,~,. .._
.Ul'____ aIlIIIltlwu."tt"a:__._"'H~"""
COIIIIICJOn. "_.lGt_"'nc_lt~ft_ICIQlAC':IM!Q,
.::.:..":':'::.= === ~~..=....r_ M__
flIISI(NOPIIAllllux..n ...._llo.-rcr 1Ht___IImJICI_....,
='~'~IIO:"~~~~:~~:,~
J. ~~=:'".:c..owr.J,.m::'=."'lllf /1ft tOIINtT."'1III;1' Ill'\.llll
I. ~'f~Y(d:s~_'IlOIlt>CNlIIKIIU.__InCIMtIMIDWlJ
1. ~..~rr'J'"=':u~r....lM(_IISI"'Mld\Ia._or!\Ml\_lIII
I. ~~'\lr""'IIIldI,",,---fMIO_IIDII)
...-MII.........
'. .....,."..,r....lluIU......._.-IlIl.ll111l1t1lt1A1OV1UO_.-u.
...-.....-......... _"_"S1AlIIUlllJ_Of~_COWOlIIl
10_ S1__ roIt _ SlOCll(.wlSt 1M.1.''''~
~mn-. wu.. _ _1MIITtIl~.1C_'S"""!IJIW(.
-
I. M.l."-."~ltll\l.ClO_I' llII..lllI.I:I IMCll
........-
I. ..7::::-U:~~~':""'-:':~._llhT-...rulllOSS.
~m,i?.!.~-:~=Is::.~:=.__arM.l.'_
~cweo _I""",," I _""_IU.-... .l/'I'I.CI1IIll1lll'P,I,JIT\J TIC
:":'~~~O'~~~II(t.:s.~_~~:'~/2US.
---
Il[(S"...'...lIlln1S1l1Q
""'UlSIllIIOIOII_US_I_I.'"Illl1S!ll11O..
SOl_ ,o-1""~.'IlU$/1IIW"
lf~l"=:~~'::===~O':~:: II J''-
..-
t :~:CUl:c.:::-".IlI"=.:m__er:=..'--"lIICN~""-
l ~'::=='~.:O-';':~~?=.IIC-:'ICI-
~:E=~:=II~"''::=O: :u:::. n:::o~ 10
-
\. :-t~r~~IfL'W~~~.ftP\Alllnjll$loIl,UO(tlIllItll,._ItTOII
t. '==1'1"::1-.""'" ICUn_, !HI: __.... InlM __ ..,111_1
-
1 ....__(IMII...SOCI$IWl,.~_..tr(lIIlill1'lollt(l_1CW'I1IICI
..-... M.l.'IUII...,IItt$SHIll.n_",",roItOll[(I)ltMJnP_IlXIPI_...QWMII
g~k=
TYPICAL TREE PLANTlNO DET AL
".1.$.
~
.. ,
"
~
,
..
.
"
.
'"
.......... ........
0-.... .......
~....._ofn...
-..-
L..................
CMlAWf1SUl100ATt'....
"to..
1)1/[["'_
CIlIISHMS ,AU1
IMMeI'tPICnptw,.lt
r',10'ef
~S lhU.. 12'-'" J S'.", j' elL .... .' et.
)O~.10'.U"Gll((llfNolk
<<:.IO'.I2'0IL
3O...,..-10....-5',JII-........, 2'...,
DOLPHIN POINT CONDOMINIUMS
LANDSCAPE PLAN
,..
..
"
"
owr OWMDOI .... ntlfr
-~-
_[FOIIIlTIIN"'o\S$
CMlOIONID'1U!
MlIIIR<<lIO""'"ut1Of'{
3""-,31"111.. 3'g,e.
J~.tlI'-2J".U'O.C.
JGAI.,JQ"K,.',J'O.C,
1 lOAL,tlI"X !O',J'O.c
lG1L.ll"MI.2'o,e
...."'",.,-
h,,~I""'''' ......
,..,...11- ""'"-
2_lurl..._
1U.l'Wfn.l.l.OllG ".Tn All 10 eLUA""-..m lllWlGW l'[Jl COOL
,....-
-'::..":{'::!I
IU_"",,,,
TYPICAL MUL Tl-STEM ~EE PLANTING DET AL
TYPICAL SHAUB ,',',LANTING DETAIL.
-t.~~1:.r?i:-- ,
'.' " ", .", ." ': ' j.
~
CfOJhOCOve:I.::-'NrHCl OETAL
1t1.1.3
2 ~
;
,. "1/01 ..--L~
.'
!
t i!
! i i i. j
. .! '1 {
! . I !i d
~ g' ~ l: ~ ~
I j ,~i ,~ ~
I !! · ! 1"1 !: :
i I' !' 11 ; Ii ~; ~o
u ,! ~ I . I' l o! 01 ,.
~: ~ l' ,I I ~ aH n i! I'~ ~,
p'! ~ I R ; i I ~ . 11'1" ~ ! i
.; 1ft" i!' . r s.
H Ii! ~ ~ ; i i~ I i H i! ~E
"r i , I'" i i' I ~"I~' .!
~n i i !: I II:! J ; h i~ E
;" I", ~ i!' \.1' ,~a" Ii
f . ' I i I ". 1 t i 01 o! ,0
Ii!! i i: ~ ~ I H, i ~ ~i~! i d
!. I!' I !,I ~ ,a II ~ ~.h ji ! "
!I i I I B I; ill' ~ p~ ';, U~~ ~~ ~ ~~
'.! I a! i. · .21 ~,.~ I - "~Il I"' ~ "
.. , I I.;i i~~P j 11'1' l! hI :~ I H
r~ t. B ihl !i i ! ~ [. ,'~i !i i 't
:!illt ISi!' ".l!' I~i!!~' ~~\; i!!. ~.
'! , I 8..8 l'j' ~, '0 .' ~l'. lid ,0 I,
~llii, i :~I'~ '!1~~ ~.i i~ ;: ~!~i~ ~, 1 I, ~!
'~'ll"~' ,~ ' t~'o u.! I" ,. .r o~e i!~:r
hP!HH E;I! ~!I:1 m'~~ : i isU h~ g!~~ n
!lJIHHi I!H !hU :!!I~~ I! m~ ii~ I~~~ H
Hh~:!'!'!!'I' i~!!' ~llii~ ~ i ~~il !:~ ~Q!! i~
~;'I' li.'~Ii' Sol>W i!i~a" ! ~ !~u~, !j; !lo'tf
'1"'I~!lflIVl!ti .ijg~ .a"lotf ; ~ !I ,'., .\~i.,
, 3~"n]'!' 'vlH !l,i: u I 1 ~;i n !o~o ot
! i,.111!i,P '.113 ~l~.l ",h~ i~' "~~ i~
i~iddl\h~ll l;I!~ ~i!li~ II Wi !~~ ~;~I ii
i!!igl~I!~hm,! ;ih; i.!lli~l~i l~~~ m~ !~~ !i~~!~
'g" ,1,... 'i" ~,.' '. . ,r, U' !
I Ui"!;'!PW fhi! .;.I.i ,i; ~m ,Ii ~i~! 0'
r!il'~'!l'lr' !la'! "laj" lii (e,! i~' ~'" '2
l!!: WI ilsH mh iHU:~ ~.~ ~i~! ~~~ !iH:1
!':>:::~.!~!!!!r",i~ ah~im i!li f~:ii iti1i ~!d~ ~~
. ..,... ~ ~.. ~N: ~~ h i~!~! ~n Ijo.u ~1
,
I !
,I '
II h I
II! ;: .;
, '!, l'
I; -;:;..~.:.: !ii J!
l.~"'n~
f I ~ II ;
i!
-. ;1
I ! I!
I !
!
I
I i ~ iM ill :,
~ ~ r;,
I
,
,
!
I
~ i
';'
e' ! 0
1111 I
h!llj
!UH;
W:h
'l'llli
I ill:
d~I!!
I !!l ijl!
B'15.,1
P:,lli!
i h: l'~i~
I,,! I .
;l ~i .-:J
..",will
plnH.
imm:
Ir!!!!m
-..........."".
/
:::.,
",
,/
,
!
\
'"
\
\
---- - - -----
z
4 ~
PO.........._ .1.1..'...._ ~
~ ~ rI
,. WI I h.
I' I
~ ~ Ill, Ii!!
~ f i,'IU fii
,Uil h ~f. fl.
I'dPj h
!h~! ~I!!!
1 '
. , ! I I.
i' Li I.j.lU ,;i ~
1,1' !jIC" .'. il I'll i'
Y
i
I
i,
:; i
i ~
i
I ~
..
l!
~
"..-
v,
6
v
<J
^'
~
II ! I I.
"II ! i ;il
II I ill ,.1
II 1'1 !I.,
.. ;1 '~if
lCW
I'
I
i 1111111
f IlIldl
I nnlll
I ..
. .. . . I!lI . .
J
"-
%
;;
%
w
~
'"
z
"
~
>-
I
'"
in
......\..,....""J~."'....."Xl!:',.60"'...J~
'" '"
::Ii :!
:> ~
- ...
<;....
::Ii 0
o
00
z z
o ~
Uz
... ~
z ~
(50..
0.. Z
z Q
~ ~
~2
o a:
o !!;;
J ~
z. :
o. :;;:-
~ 1.=~
i IiI;
j 0-
(j
~.
(l)'ffi
I-'!
~t
"{"
~~ ~~
::V.'
(J) ~ -"
~~ j~
Q..,;
o. ,~
~q~
Cijl"
lUt ;E
Q~ =~
<(:
Qi
~!
Ii
lRJ
jiii:! I
mm
1~~11.
-..- 'II,.,-....~.......,-...\,-_..,-,~"
...
01; !
~ !
~ .
a
! .
~
W(X)'lpJeJa:JUads@sfs WOo> ...JJ~~s.MN.H.
XI Z6U-l'nflZL H:)t1V-6l>1>ILZl
~lEt: eWO\;::I 'JaleJNeaJ:J
3^,'If :ajj..lAn l.(tnos S ~ Z l
6u!uuetd 8Jnpal!lf.JJV
':JIll 'aJllIJa)!'PJV 5a1(i!JOSSV pIX) Ja~U3ds
DC
<<l
11
z,
o.
~ !
~ 7 !
w .
u:J I
I- '
Z a
o r
a: i
z
o
~,
<(-
>'
w.
..J
W
W
o
Ci5
t
w
..J
SNOI.LV^~
~ Q
" ~
~ ~ ~ 0
, <
! . . ~
1; 8 ~ ~
valllOl~ 'll3.LVMllV31:J
.LNIOd NIHdloa
SVllnINIV>lOONO:J NIHdlOO A'v<lD
[I ~]
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E. D. ARMSTRONG III
JOHN T. BLAKELY
BRUCE H. BOKOR
GUY M. BURNS
JONATHAN S. COLEMAN
MICHAEL T. CRONIN
ROBERT M. DAISLEY
EUZABETHJ.DANffiLS
MARION HALE
SCOTT C. ILGENFRIlZ
FRANK R. JAKES
TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.
SHARON E. KRICK
ROGER A. LARSON
JOHN R. LAWSON, JR.'
TRACY E. LEDUC
MICHAEL G. LITTLE
MICHAEL C. MARKHAM
STEPHANffi T. MARQUARDT
A.R. "CHARLffi" NEAL
F. WALLACE POPE, JR.
ROBERT V. POTTER, JR.
AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY
DONALD P. REED
DARRYL R. RICHARDS
PETER A. RIVELLINI
DENNIS G. RUPPEL'
CHARLES A. SAMARKOS
PHILIP M. SHASTEEN
JOAN M. VECCHIOLI
STEVEN H. WEINBERGER
AMBER F. WILLIAMS
JULIUS J. ZSCHAU
'OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO. 103901
September 19, 2001
VIA E-MAIL and U.S. MAIL
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle
Clearwater, Florida 33756
~?6
Re: Gray Dolphin Case No. FL01-06-23, Application for Flexible Development
Dear Ms. Fierce:
I have filed an Application for Flexible Development in the above-referenced
case. That application was heard by the Community Development Board and approved
as to all matters, except as to the fifty-foot height request. and the dock site plan. I
have since filed an amendment request asking for eleven (11) units and height of fifty-
(50) feet.
As part of the development of that property I will be installing docks and slip
facilities to accommodate six (6) boats. Exact placement of the dock facilities and their
dimensions are shown on the site plan filed pursuant to the Application.
Per your request I am responding to the "criteria" as established by Ordinance
Number 6795-01 as it relates to Section 3-601, paragraph 2, multi-use docks.
The request will be a "Level 2" request and it will require approval by the
Community Development Board. I provide the following criteria:
1 . The dock is less than 500 square feet in deck area, but does not comply
with the dimensional requirements set forth in Section 3-601 (C)(3)(h).
2. The dimensional requirements that I ask relief from are item i and iii of
that section.
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368
TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818
TELECOPIER (727) 462-0365
TAMPA OFFICE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 19, 2001
Page 2
I. Item i requires that the multi-use docks shall be located so that no
portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into
the water than ten (10) percent of the applicant's property width
measured at the waterfront property line. My facility has its tie
poles approximately one foot inside the applicant's property line.
ii. Item iii requires that the width of the docking facilities shall not
exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's
property measured at the waterfront property line. The applicants
dock facility exceeds that width.
Referring to each of the criteria set forth in paragraphs (a)-(h), I can provide you
the following:
(a) Use and Compatibilitv.
i. The proposed docks shall be subordinate to and contribute to the
comfort, convenience or necessities of the users of the occupants of the principle use
of the property, which shall be a condominium complex having between 9 and 11 units.
ii. The proposed docks shall be in harmony with the scale and
character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. Both properties lying
on either side of the subject property have docks that are accommodating boats that
shall lie perpendicular to the seawall.
iii. The proposed docks shall be compatible with dock patterns in their
general facility. Reference ii. Above.
(b) Impacts on Existina Water Recreation Facilities. The use of the proposed
docks shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently
using adjacent waterways for recreation and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, the
docks shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses
including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats.
(c) Impacts on Naviaation. The existence and use of the proposed docks
shall not have a detrimental affect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation,
transportation, recreation or other public conveniences.
(d) Impacts on Marine Environment.
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 19, 2001
Page 3
i. The docks have been designed and are sited to insure that boat
access routes avoid injury to marine aspects or other aquatic resources in the
surrounding areas.
ii. The docks will not have an adverse impact upon natural marine
habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life or establish
marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of the type useful as nursery or feeding
grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs, and any such artificial reef
which has developed in associated in flora and fauna which have been determined to
be approaching a typical natural assemblance structure in both density and diversity;
oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting sites, commercial or sport fisheries or
shell fisheries areas and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitats.
e. Impacts on Water Quality.
i. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any
other area associated with the dock has adequate circulation and existing water depths
to insure that a minimum of one-foot clearance is provided between the lowest member
of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or
ordinary low water (minus 0.95 NGVD datum).
ii. The dock does not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm
drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely effect the water quality presently existing in
the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the
area in which the dock is proposed to be located.
f. Impacts on Natural Resources.
i. The dock does not have any material adverse impact upon the
conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and
shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest.
ii. The dock does not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas;
vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species
providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range,
nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which
would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation
areas such as those identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, National Wildlife
Refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird
sanctuaries.
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 19, 2001
Page 4
g. Impacts on Wetlands. Habitats/Uplands. The dock does not have
immaterial adverse affect upon the upland surrounding.
h. Dimensional Standards.
i. Setbacks. requires that the multi-use docks shall be located so that no
portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into the water than 10%
of the applicant's property where measured at the waterfront property line. The
applicant's dock facility has its tie poles approximately one-foot inside the Applicant's
property line.
ii. LenQth. The length of the commercial and multi-use docks
shall not extend from the mean high waterline or seawall of the Applicant's property
more than 75% of the width of the Applicant's property measured at the waterfront
property line. The Applicant's width of property is 120-feet. 75% of the width would be
90-feet. The docks will not extend beyond that distance. Tie poles may extend beyond
the dock provided that such poles do not extend 25% of the width of the waterway and
do not constitute a navigational hazard. The tie poles will not extend 25% of the width
of the waterway and will not constitute a navigational hazard.
iii. Width. The width of the multi-use facilities will exceed 75% of the
width of the Applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line due to the fact
that the tie holes are at approximately 1-foot inside the Applicant's property line.
iv. Covered Boat Lifts. The covered boatlift will not be constructed.
v. Deviations. A deviation from these requirements with respect to i.
and iii., above must be considered and approved by the Community Development
Board.
This fully responds to the criteria of Ordinance 6795-01.
The Ordinance itself is somewhat confusing. The Applicant falls within the multi-
use dock definition, but does not meet the dimensional standards required by Section
3-601 (C)(3)(h). A multi-use dock only becomes a commercial dock when a deck area
exceeds 500 square feet. The Applicant's deck area does not exceed 500 square feet,
and therefore is not considered a commercial dock. Even under the commercial dock
designations it provides at Section h (v) deviations, that deviations from the
requirements of this section, which I assume is Section h will be considered and
approved by the Community Development Board in order to comply with the review
criteria established in Sections 3-601 (C)(3)(a)-(g). I am uncertain as to whether or not
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 19, 2001
Page 5
that consideration also includes Sections 3 (a) through (g). Nevertheless, I have
responded to those sections accordingly.
Yours very truly,
~~
Roger A. Larson
cc: Mark Parry (VIA E-MAIL)
#247369 v1 - Larson/GrayDolphin/Ltr. to Fierce/RAUrms
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E. D. ARMSTRONG III
JOHN T. BLAKELY
BRUCE H. BOKOR
GUY M. BURNS
JONATHAN S. COLEMAN
MICHAEL T. CRONIN
ROBERT M. DAISLEY
ELIZABETH J. DANIELS
MARION HAlE
SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R. JAKES
TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.
SHARON E. KRICK
ROGER A. LARSON
JOHN R. LAWSON, JR..
TRACY E. LEDUC
MICHAEL G. LITTLE
MICHAEL C. MARKHAM
STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT
A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL
F. WALLACE POPE, JR.
ROBERT V. POTTER, JR.
AUDREY B. RAUCHW A Y
DONALD P. REED
DARRYL R. RICHARDS
PETER A. RIVELLINI
DENNIS G. RUPPEL*
CHARlES A. SAMARKOS
PHILIP M. SHASTEEN
JOAN M. VECCmOLI
STEVEN H. WEINBERGER
AMBER F. WILLIAMS
JULIUS J. ZSCHAU
.OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO. 103901
August 28, 2001
r-- ....~.. .
t:
[
VIA E-MAIL and U.S. MAIL
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle
Clearwater, Florida 33756
'; 1-, j
U .1
i Uj
FILE
Re: Gray Dolphin Case No. FLQ1-06-23 Application for Flexible Development
Dear Ms. Fierce:
I have filed an Application for Flexible Development in the above-referenced
case. That application was heard by the Community Development Board and approved
as to all matters, except as to the fifty-foot height request. and the dock site plan. I
have since filed an amendment request asking for eleven (11) units and height of fifty-
(50) feet.
As part of the development of that property I will be installing docks and slip
facilities to accommodate six (6) boats. Exact placement of the dock facilities and their
dimensions are shown on the site plan filed pursuant to the Application.
Per your request I am responding to the "criteria" as established by Ordinance
Number 6795-01 as it relates to Section 3-601, paragraph 2, multi-use docks.
The request will be a "Level 2" request and it will require approval by the
Community Development Board. I provide the following criteria:
1. The dock is less than 500 square feet in deck area, but does not comply
with the dimensional requirements set forth in Section 3-601 (C)(3)(h).
2. The dimensional requirements that I ask relief from are item i and iii of
that section.
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, flORIDA 33757.1368
TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818
TELECOPIER (727) 462-0365
TAMPA OFFICE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 225.2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
August 28, 2001
Page 2
I. Item i requires that the multi-use docks shall be located so that no
portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into
the water than ten (10) percent of the applicant's property width
measured at the waterfront property line. My facility has its tie
poles approximately one foot inside the applicant's property line.
II. Item iii requires that the width of the docking facilities shall not
exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's
property measured at the waterfront property line. The applicants
dock facility exceeds that width.
Referring to each of the criteria set forth in paragraphs (a)-(h), I can provide you
the following:
(a) Use and Compatibilitv.
i. The proposed docks shall be subordinate to and contribute to the
comfort, convenience or necessities of the users of the occupants of the principle use
of the property, which shall be a condominium complex having between 9 and 11 units.
ii. The proposed docks shall be in harmony with the scale and
character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. Both properties lying
on either side of the subject property have docks that are accommodating boats that
shall lie perpendicular to the seawall.
iii. The proposed docks shall be compatible with dock patterns in their
general facility. Reference ii. Above.
(b) Impacts on Existinq Water Recreation Facilities. The use of the proposed
docks shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently
using adjacent waterways for recreation and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, the
docks shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses
including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats.
(c) Impacts on Naviqation. The existence and use of the proposed docks
shall not have a detrimental affect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation,
transportation, recreation or other public conveniences.
(d) Impacts on Marine Environment.
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
A TTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
August 28, 2001
Page 3
I. The docks have been designed and are sited to insure that boat
access routes avoid injury to marine aspects or other aquatic resources in the
surrounding areas.
ii. The docks will not have an adverse impact upon natural marine
habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life or establish
marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of the type useful as nursery or feeding
grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs, and any such artificial reef
which has developed in associated in flora and fauna which have been determined to
be approaching a typical natural assemblance structure in both density and diversity;
oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting sites, commercial or sport fisheries or
shell fisheries areas and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitats.
e. Impacts on Water Quality.
i. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any
other area associated with the dock has adequate circulation and existing water depths
to insure that a minimum of one-foot clearance is provided between the lowest member
of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or
ordinary low water (minus 0.95 NGVD datum).
ii. The dock does not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm
drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely effect the water quality presently existing in
the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in the
area in which the dock is proposed to be located.
f. Impacts on Natural Resources.
i. The dock does not have any material adverse impact upon the
conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and
shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest.
ii. The dock does not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas;
vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species
providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range,
nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which
would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation
areas such as those identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, National Wildlife
Refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird
sanctuaries.
-
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
August28,2001
Page 4
g. Impacts on Wetlands. Habitats/Uplands. The dock does not have
immaterial adverse affect upon the upland surrounding.
h. Dimensional Standards.
i. Setbacks. requires that the multi-use docks shall be located so that no
portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into the water than 10%
of the applicant's property where measured at the waterfront property line. The
applicant's dock facility has its tie poles approximateiy one-foot inside the Applicant's
property line.
ii. Lenqth. The length of the commercial and multi-use docks
shall not extend from the mean high waterline or seawall of the Applicant's property
more than 75% of the width of the Applicant's property measured at the waterfront
property line. The Applicant's width of property is 120-feet. 75% of the width would be
90-feet. The docks will not extend beyond that distance. Tie poles may extend beyond
the dock provided that such poles do not extend 25% of the width of the waterway and
do not constitute a navigational hazard. The tie poles will not extend 25% of the width
of the waterway and will not constitute a navigational hazard.
iii. Width. The width of the multi-use facilities will exceed 75% of the
width of the Applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line due to the fact
that the tie holes are at approximately 1-foot inside the Applicant's property line.
IV. Covered Boat Lifts. The covered boatlift will not be constructed.
v. Deviations. A deviation from these requirements with respect to i.
and iii., above must be considered and approved by the Community Development
Board.
This fully responds to the criteria of Ordinance 6795-01.
The Ordinance itself is somewhat confusing. The Applicant falls within the multi-
use dock definition, but does not meet the dimensional standards required by Section
3-601 (C)(3)(h). A multi-use dock only becomes a commercial dock when a deck area
exceeds 500 square feet. The Applicant's deck area does not exceed 500 square feet,
and therefore is not considered a commercial dock. Even under the commercial dock
designations it provides at Section h (v) deviations, that deviations from the
requirements of this section, which I assume is Section h will be considered and
approved by the Community Development Board in order to comply with the review
criteria established in Sections 3-601 (C)(3)(a)-(g). I am uncertain as to whether or not
, ...
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
August 28,2001
Page 5
that consideration also includes Sections 3 (a) through (g). Nevertheless, I have
responded to those sections accordingly.
Yours very truly,
~~
Roger A. Larson
cc: Mark Parry (VIA E-MAIL)
#247369 v1 - Larson/GrayDolphin/Ltr. to Fierce/RAUrms
.
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
t~_.,._
August 23, 2001
Re: Gray Dolphin Condominiums (Dolphin Point Site)
FL 01-06-23
~
en
~ \
\ \ ....=:
'- .'
------"
~... ~~
I
j
Mr. Mark Parry, Sr. Planner
City of Clearwater Planning and Development Services Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Dear Mr. Parry:
Per the discussions at the August 21, 2001 CDB meeting, we are amending our application to include a
total of 11 units within a 50 foot height limit. Weare also reinstating our request for approval of the
docks shown on the Preliminary Site Plan. Weare submitting the following items:
1. Flexible Development Application for Residential Infill Approval (15 copies)
2. Affidavit to Authorize Agent (15 copies)
3. Deed (15 copies)
4. Revised Preliminary Site Plan (15 copies) - also one 8 W' x 11"
5. Revised Landscape Plan (15 copies) - also one 8 W' x 11"
6. Revised Irrigation Plan (15 copies) - also one 8 W' x 11"
7. Revised Building Elevations (15 copies) - also one 8 Y2" x 11"
8. Survey (15 copies)
The Preliminary Site Plan and building elevations have been revised to show 11 units. Nothing else on
the site plan has changed, the project is still within allowable density and height restrictions and parking
requirements are satisfied.
We look forward to the DRC and CDB meetings. If you have any questions please call me at (727)
724-8422.
Sincerely,
ROP!~/
Vice President! Transportation and Planning
:cp
Enc!.
L:\parry-6.doc
cc: Roger Larson
Steve Spencer
File 997-143
2639 McCORMICK DRIVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759
Tel: (727) 724-8422 · Fax: (727) 724-8606
-",J
....
. CS"ZZ-O 1
lZ:01pm
FrOm-JOHNSONIB~Y +7Z74418617 ~ T-08Z P.02/0S
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEY:> AND COUNSEll.ORS AT l.AW
F-9S7
E. 0. ARMS'l1l.0NG III
JOHN T. l~l.^KEL. Y
BRUCE H. BOKOR
GUY M. BURNS
JONATI1AN S. COLliM^N
MICHAEl. T. CRONIN
ROBERT M. DAISLEY
ELIZABETIt 1. DANIELS
MARlON HALE
SCOTT C. ll.GENFRlTZ
FRANK R. JAKES
TIMOTHY A. 10lfNSON. JI{.
SI1^KON Ii. KRICK
ROGER A. LARSON
JOHN R. LAWSON. JR.'
TRACY r.. L.t:DUC
MICI-IAEL G. urn.E
MIOIAEL C. MARKHAM
SH:I't1ANlli T. MARQUARDT
A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAl.
F. WALLACE POPE, JR.
ROBERT v. I>()TfER. JR.
AUPREYB.RAUCHWAY
DONALD P. REED
DARRYl.. R. R.ICHARDS
PETER A. 1~IVcU.INI
PENl'lIS O. RUPPEl.'
CHARlES A. SAMAftf(OS
PHILIP M. SFtASTliEN
JOAN M. VECCIUOLI
Sil:VEN H. WEINBERGER.
AMBER-F. W~
ruuus 1. 2SCHi\U
'Of COUNSEL
PLEASEREPL-YTO CLEARWATER
FILE NO. 103901
August 22, 2001
Mr. Mark Parry
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Gray Dolphin FI 01-06-23
Dear Mr. Parry:
f(D) fE @ fE 0 \Yl ~
UUJ AU6 23 2001 ~
PlANNING & DE~
CITY OF CL~~~~~~ SVCS
This letter is accompanying a request for an amendment to the site plan for the
above-described application.
The Community Development Board approved, with all staff recommendations,
the application as filed except for the request for 50-feet in height. It is my
understanding that all other requests for deviation under the flexible standards and
residential infill requirements were approved except for the height.
This amendment is solely and exclusively to amend the site plan to increase the
occupied density from nine (9) units to eleven (11) units and to increase the height,
after the FEMA credit to fifty (50) feet.
This application for amendment is made upon the premise that if the amendment
is denied that the original site plan approved remains in full force and effect. If this is
not the case then you should call me immediately to discuss these issues.
Additionally, at our original request for approval it is voluntarily agreed between
the City and myself that the decision on the configuration of the docks would not be a
part of the consideration by the Community Development Board. The application for
the permitting of the docks must be considered separately from the amendment site
plan.
CLEAjt W A TEil. Of'~'ICf.
~ II <:'HF~'l"NlIT ~TP J;IlT
POST OFl'lCf. BOX 13~8
Cl,UARWA'ffiR, fLORlDA 33757-1368
'f~LI'.I'HON~: (717)4Gl.!gU
TELECOPJE" (727) 462-0365
T.'-MI'A OFFICE
tOO wo\'\......" .....~.^ ~'\..u.,..:..r
SUITE 1800
POS). O~~IC~~ ~Ox 1100
TAMPA,FLORlDA 33601-l100
Wl-I!I'HO~f. (~Il) 11H~OO
TELECOPIER (8J3) 123.71 IS
08/22/2001 WED 11:57
[TXlRX NO 5459] f4l 002
.. '-
08-22-01 12:01pm
FrOm-JOHNSONIB~Y
+7274418617 ~
T-D82 P.D3/D3 F-957
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS ANn COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Mr. Mark Parry
August 22, 2001
Page 2
I realize that under the normal progression of things, based on my filing of
August 23, 2001 that I would have a DRe meeting on September 13, 2001. I
respectfully request that we be allowed to meet on the docks at an earlier date so that
those issues can be resolved early on considering the length of time that staff has had
an opportunity to review the dock plan.
For purposes of review by the Community Development Board I request that a
full board hear the request for amendment. Because of a conflict with Board Member
Ed Mazur, it is requested the alternate board member be in attendance. If a full board
is not available at meeting time I request the matter be deferred to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Community Development Board.
Yours very truly,
Q:~
cc: Lisa Fierce
08/22/2001 WED 11: 57 [TX/RX NO 5459] 14l 00:3
.
~
.
,-_....-,"'~,
,,',:'.., ,~,~ l"," 1
rn {E \\ \';1 ir', \ \' i'\
. DC. ",,,,,,,~"'-'-:;-"1,' ! I :
~_..~'-"'._,. j. \' \
I \ i i
\ D \\ JUN 1 8 1:~2 \ ,,_,,/ '\
S' 1HGER.PROP:ERtIES LLP
LPtAt~~l~:~}p~~~~:;;~:~~~:~~8 '
Dunedin, Florida 34698
727-461-1818
/fk
June 7, 2002
Cynthia Tarrapani, AICP
City of Clearwater
Planning Director
10<>> South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FI 33756
Re: Development Order re: Case FL 01-06-23 at 211 Dolphin Point;
Request for extension for Application of Building Permit
Dear Ms. Terapani:
Badger Properties LLP obtained a Development Order from the City of
Clearwater pursuant to section 4-2060.6 of the Community Development Code
on August 21, 2001.
Pursuant to section 4-407 an application for a building permit shall be
made within one year of the flexible development approval date, which is August
21,2002.
In light of the events of September 11,2001 it was my determination not to
proceed with the construction of the units until a more favorable marketplace and
environment was available for the construction, marketing and sale of the eleven
(11) condominium units.
Since the approval of the development order, however, I can advise you
that I have proceeded with my permits to obtain docks both through local and
federal authorities and those permits should be available shortly.
I have employed the general contractor and instructed the architect to
commence final drawings for the application of permits.
All soil tests, environmental tests, site planning and basic floor plan design
for each of the units has been completed.
...
.
.
I am instituting an appraisal and feasibility study to establish the
marketable sales price of the units and have drafted and will be filing within the
next forty-five (45) days the application to the Department of Business
Regulation, Division of Land Sales and Condominiums for the approval of the
condominium documentation. I then intend to present the units for sale on the
marketplace. In light of the economy, I have taken the approach that until I have
firm sales of at lease seven (7) of the eleven (11) units, I will not break ground.
Notwithstanding that philosophy I will be proceeding in a diligent fashion to
complete final working drawings so that permits can be applied for timely within
the extension period.
I respectfully request that the City of Clearwater grant me a one-year
extension for the making of application for permits.
Please place this request on the next regular agenda for approval.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Yours very truly,
~/ ~- ~~/
//' /
! ~/_~
- oger K Larson
.
.
I CASE #: /.,(p{.J_
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): v-../'
ATLAS PAGE #: ZJ: 7 'B..
ZONING DISTRICT: 114)tIJ/l.,
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: E.1f
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENTPR~PE ES:
NORTH:
SOUTH: 'V
WEST:
EAST:
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES 01: THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project (Revised 3/29/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Roqer larson, Johnson, Blakely. Pope. Bokor. Ruppel & Bums
MAILING ADDRESS:
911 Chestnut Street. ClpRrwrlter. Florida 33757
PHONE NUMBER:
(727L 461.,..1818
FAX NUMBER: . (727) 44l.,.8617
PROPERTYOWNER(S): Houle Industries, Inc., 531 Cannerce Drive, Largo, FL 33709
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME: Robert Pergolizzi, AICP 'F'l Qri nt=l ~i gn C'nmml t-t=ln-h::. Tn~
MAILING ADDRESS: 2639 McConnick Drive, Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: (727) 724-8422
FAX NUMBER: (727) 724-8606
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS:
N/A Vacant Property-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Inh:; ]0 t=lnnll, Tlni't- t;.,..~, T~1:1'l~ ~=~ot-P9 rot f'lp;:n''''IT.at-pr
08/29/15/43398/000/0100 an~ 08,(19/"15/43398/000/0110
, \.' \: .
! j ,
16,000 s.f. (0.37 Acres) i' ....1,
(acres, square feet) I .
II Condominium Units
SFU I 8
""'_I
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of ~residential use)
PI.. .,
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Variation to minimum lot width,s~tba("_.k.(::;_, height
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduCtion in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
~ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it s
located. , 'h al danini' h "lcli f wh' ch .
Dolplun POlnt as sever con urn Ul ngs, many 0 1 are multl....stoI"l.
The Dolphin Cove a:mdaniniurn is eleven stories, the Isle of Clearwater oondaniniurn is
five stories and other buildings on the street are two stories and three stories. All
properties are rrediurn or high density residential.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. Adjacent properties appear to be fully developed. Developrent of
the property with upscale condaniniurn units would tend to irrprove property values
and may enooura<]eupgradin} of nP-arny propF'rf-ips
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
The health and safety of residents in the n~jSJhlxnf1(,)()(,,) wi'] 1 nor hP AmTPT!':p 1 y
affected. Parking will Be at ground level and all living arpi'lS wi] 1 hp p] ~Ti'lrro on
on the second throuqh:fi.ftl:L floors. ,
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Eleven condominium units would generate 6.4 daily 'l€hicle trips according to I'lli
Trip Generation, 6th Edition. This is minimal.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The COllIl1lll1ity consists of several condominiurn developrents ranging from two
stories to eleven stories.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, induding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
The design is sensitive to surrounding properties and minimizes adverse effects.
o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
The property has 125 feet of frontage (lot width) whereas the minimum requirerrent
is 150 feet, therefore, lot width, setback and height deviations are necessary
and the Residential Infill criteria should be applied.
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
AccorcH ng to the Pine]] FIR ('nnnty Property ApprFli e;p'r, t-np pxie;+ing vFlC'.;mt- 1 Ann \TFlhlP
is approximately ~243,OOO, whereas the applicant e.c::;tiIn;:)te.c; t-he in![.Hoved value t-n he
$3 million. 'lli.is improverrent is expected to iIrprove values in the neighborliood.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
CondomininnmJS (attached dwellin9"s 1 are i=t pert)Ji t-t-pn llRP lA{i't-n j)'1 t-np 1~ '7one
in the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
'Ihe underlyi119 land llse j'R 'Rpsf(lpnh".f1,' Hi<p.~ tbp. ('..ounrywi qA F'llt-nrP r .FInn TTRP Pl Fin
which pennits 30 units per a.cre and the current zoning is ~dium High Lens.it;y-
Residential (MHDRl which penni ts attached dwellinqs. Adia~t . land uses include
condaniniUlIE ranging fran two stories to eleven stories.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential intill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
Il!:.oposed for development
The existing property is the only vaC'-8nt pr'lrcel on t-hp !';t-rppt- T)::'VP'~nt nf t-hE'
property with upscale eondcxniniums, will1lp<JTf1de thp . J~fAh::> nE'iT~ sma.
and increase the property -value and overall app"arAnf"'P ,
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinih' of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The desiqn <XIllplies with current building code reqllireTl1F'nt-_c: FIR all nFlhit-Flhle floors
will be elevated and parking will occupy' the:9XOund floor. '!he proposCiI .inchlOpQ'
attractive architecture;, landscapin<::J, and will provide open news:- of the water. It is
III character wi th surro~ uses~
7. Aexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
iIIlmediflte vi.c;nity Qf the par,ce1 PfO.P9Sej:I for pevelopm~t and the City of Oearwater as a whole. .
vue to me l.ot Slze 1t 1S llIlPractical to neet standard setbacks, he1ght, and mininnn
lot width and provide for desired parkinq for a reasonable densi tv that is consistent
wi th the land use plan and surrounding uses. 'Ibis is in character with the ccmmmi ty.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
j0{ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COPY OF RECORDED PUAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT"as required;
XK LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
XI{ GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
~ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
*
-X..
-X.
1=
X-
X
-X-
...x.
X
-X-
-2-
L
=f
lL
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, weUands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
xx SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabularform:
-X-
1L
f-
i-
f-
L
)fJ
o
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) and color rendering if possible;
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: (NJT APPLICABLE)
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a .certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallntill Project- City of Clearwater
)f&:
A-
t
x
L
X-
l-
X-
X-
x
XlID{
X€iX
o
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
lANDSCAPE PlAN:
NI existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas inclUding swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of an required perimeter landscape buffers;
. Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of aU parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and Immediately adjacent to the site. by species, size and locations, incluolfl9 dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of aft existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting detai1s for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants Including instructions, soli mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Ioterior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions Imposed by the Community DeveIoprnent Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PlAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering If possible);
IRRIGATION PlAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Disbicts) or as part
of a ComPrehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Projecl
D{ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - aU sides of an buildings Including height dimensions, colors and materials;
XK REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - tow sides of buikflfl9 with colors and materials to scale (8 Yz X 11) (black and white and color rendering. If
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
a Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11 ) (color), If submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
N/A
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) .
N/A
o Include as required If proposed development will ~rade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transporlation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that an representations made in Ihls STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEllAS , H
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and ~to and subscribed before me this ~ 0 a day of
authorize Oty representatives to visit and photograph the property . H~J~ ..I _ " A.D. 20M to mE' MtilQr... by
described in this application. ~ 'f~ o;r H&t~ U? .:r~., who is ~Uy Icn~ii) has
fL..r. 1'// /7 j /, produced as
{If ~ ~ I~ identification.
_"'01 erly~~ta.'e fA:{ ~:d.1l~~
HOOIE INDUSTRIES, lNC. My com NOfARYSEAL
BY: Willia.'U Houle, Jr. DANIELWSTEEG
NOfARY PUBUC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. CC638622
M;YCOMM1~19N EXP. APR. 26,2lJOl
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residential irlfill ProJe'cl:"'City of Clearwater
.
.
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Houle Industries, Inc.
531 Coorrerce Drive, LarQo, FL 33709
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record tiUe holder(s) of the following described Pf'OPe:rty (address or generallocatioo):
lots 10 and 11, Unit 5-A, Island Estates of Clearwater
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Residential Infill
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (doesIdo) appoint: .Mr. Roger larson and .Mr. FoOert Pergolizzi
as (hisllhelr) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Cleatwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That slte visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. Thal_~..._a_.__......._~~~ ~_
P 0-8. ~
Property Owner .. , , :
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF P/NElLAS
~fore me the undersigned, an offICer duly commlssloned by ~ laws of the State of Florida, on this ::l CJ:ti; day of
....e..- .;200 l _appeared "'A.Cflp....a:-VA. who_h
"P"'OS and..,. ..., haI.... tuI1ytaldemand, "a"""" af"'_ .... """"(U
OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL ~ ~
DANIEL W STEEG rt. ~
My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBUC srATE OF FLORIDA ;?~ta~ ~
COMMISSION NO. CC638622
MY COMMISSION EXP. APR. 26.2001 '7T
.
C:\Doct.ments and Settings\esterling'J.ocat SettingslTenporal)' Internet FfJes\Ol.K5Ires/dentiat /nIitt appIication2.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
06-05-01
10 : 52~m . .F~~;;';OHNSON~
+7_274418617.
T-016
P.02l02
F-486
..
4.~
00.00
~~"l5.
.. -.. ..,.
~ I............l '8 c:......,.o...
8 OJJi3B.7 3
o.F..508q net 7 3
1his lfIarnnlu )Jerri ""..J.. ,I,r 30tr, ./N~ '" SeJ'lt=bcr
ilOlISTOIl RAy';fODGES ./14 l'lAOElTllhr b. IIOIlQ;S. his w{f~
I~",.;"..II'" ....IW ,1.,. '.......1........ tlOlIl.E IIfOlJ,SfRIES, INC.
A. U. 1'1 80 "7
.. n"'......,i.... ..,i../...~ .-.1- 1'" I..... nl II... SINI, r{ Fl fl r1 dOl
...1.1'......, 'Zoo CflmIrr~1! ~hc. Largo, Fl. 3)5"40
1.,,.;....1',.,. ,..11..# II" """"'r: .'
, ..~,/. ;1. '..............1 _'"".....
.""~I"" """". w..... .... ~ ,....-... aM' .........,- __...... ... . _tin It( 1M. __^"__ ...
.... ...-.. ~ ~-..,..;.." .... .....M .. ............... .., ,.... ~.._......, ...;.,.. M ........___.
ltIibJusdft: TI,.., ,,... ""...~,. ,., An.ll.. ......:"'.....,.... p' ,~; 'UM. 'ftl 1,' 10,00 . -..I PI.....
...1....1.1.. .......;d..'~lu.... .....tiltl ...1.""" Hi Ie,,,I., ..l_./,flw-l. '''"''7 fII""". .......,,,,. ,,11.._ J/~. ,...
,..;.". ...~.on. ........,.. ~ .:_/"_ ...". ,4. ".......... ..U u..,. 'M.M Lor." "'u...t..l1o I';nellll,
C64.lft'.:". Fl.,;".. .~..;
Lilts 10 Ind 11. llHIT 5-A. ISLAND ESTATrS OF CU:ARWATE~. accQrdill!t ~ 'the
~p or pl.t thc~of ~s recard~d in ,,.[ 80Qk 60. PA~~ 51, P~blfc Racord$
of Pine11~s toUft~. Florida.
~l' Cftt
.0 8t.c;. ..j'. r!.. q
'1 115 'Tp~~
0111:
'la 7;;..J.;';~
,-
SlIbjcc:t tQ the:
SllbJl!C:1C ~ the
~~ ..
.
.~ .. r- .... . .~~ ~ (~ :"': :
. ~ . ..., .. '-":'-
, " ":. : l) 0.. :; n
res~r'ctiofts '~d I!<<S~t~ of record.'
til~ for the )tilr 1980 ,nd 'tlIcrelfter.
. Tpgr~ "~'" .11 ,t.r ,....."'....1.. 1_.li'.."'....,. ",..t "",..""",,....,. ,1."'1'f" Iwl....,~ ... ,.. ...,.
N....... .pPt9''''''hltf1.
1., lIlut IRA " Hold. ,I.u.....,. Ut f~~ .,,,,,.I~ ,...~.'....,
,
. ,&uf ,I., ""',.",,.. 4,..""... ...........". ...ill. ..M ".....,... ,~,,' II.~ "...'a~,. 1~.,..u7.....-J 01 -w l.o-.l
1.. frr .,...,.1,.: II.., ,1..- "''''''or L.. ~.-l "fI~' ..wII...../..1 ....11_.., ,.. .." .....1 ~I ry ...., ......: ,~ ,~
"..",... I.r"/.,' flll1y "'....."" 110,. 1111. 1ft ...,.II..,.J ...,.1 ...;11 .I1'{",,,1 ,I., ........ """""1 II,... 1-/111 tiei.... .f
..n ,......",IJO "'It...""........: .....l II,.., _i.r 1.....1 i, {_ _/ ../I mo......I...,..,..,.. .."....,., I..:r.. ......nit,.... ...1....,.....,
". 1>.....-.1... '.,. I" 7ll.
~-!~.~ ~.:.:..: .;. o!
~---.. t!:f.......~'lr
'L(t,& C"';"II ('J .'.;
", .
....: ..... f
Of:t I IQ S7 tH '10
'-'
In Wit4ru iffhmo(.. II." ...i,' p'."'''' I... I."...,...,,, ,,/tn.it' 1......,( ..,,~ ....1,1.. .1.,.. -.A '/f'V
/1.., ..I....,. 1.'rIII~
~~-, . .,.~~~~~.-
'//;1 :..... J."" :;('.. ~~~: ~,.I ~~y
. ~"",,.,..{...... .__. ...~.T~J.r-...__._.."..
_//~~., ~~
.~~- .... 11= - .~...
. l"Qllstan ay"O S
~~ , ~.~~,<r. O.
f
:i r~'I'r. or "l,Ct"IP~,
cOl':-.'T\' Ill' ~1~l1a$
, "~Uh' c.r.a.'l'lfY ,I>ot ... ,~.. "'"" ....t- ...... __
,J/M'n .....Jr ,l,14.It-...i,,,.. in cllr ~..... 31"""-..< ,"4 .ft ,h. c..w...r ~{~ .. M~. .f'~~~N1I.. "~T ~.........,..r
i. ~.;
. HoIlS;ton hy I'od!l6 .lId ~d.l1nl\l: C. I'gdges
.. ~ \--.. .. .. ...... ......-. ~..l.-......., ;" "".. ,,~ ..._",....., w r............ i~h'''c.''.... th'l.Y
~ -...... tlllly........... I~"_
0- "-~~...,, "".... ... .trlri.M ........ 1~ ,..,. c;........~r .-1 S.u. f,lt( ......nOUd aa-w.
\.\~"~" S,",Pt:...'\. P. It eo
." .. ..&:~.....
1.'1': i: t. ";.tOo..
"..........J:..: ;r~
~ ,.
....L 1" . 1
, "(1,ii11(J1'!:-,/J /""1"'fttl It;!: '-:1fsn L. IIl111M$
'>AIQ-.. STBlsIllT TIl1.E (O.CF ClEAWAT~. rile.
. rnK:' ' 1290 (oqrr; St,
. Cl~4"'~r. Fl. ~3S16
.. ....--W.N
30th
....,. ..
-?A":"Jf ,,?
....----.~~_fl
.'
/~, ':,. I"
ie..!l4I7'.........i=~. ':'..:.-:.- .i. ..:-: t .,; #
~~~~~""k.::""'!.:..L..~~
L
06/05/2001 TUE 10:50
[TXlRX NO 9414 J @002
t.;l.l.Y OF CLEAJil..WATER
. AJ((i'IDA VIT TO AlJTI:ft!ftuzE AGENT
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUlLDING, 100 SOUlli MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"" FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
HOUIE INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Name off all property owners)
1. That (I arnlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
ADDRESS OR GENERAL LOCATION: IDts 10 & 11, Unit 5-A, Island Estates of Clearwater, Florida.
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
~est for Flexible DevelQplPnt Application. residential infill project and for
the creation of docks lying south of the seawall abutting the property.
(Nature of request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint Rooer A. larson and
Robert Pergolizzi
as (hisllheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5.
uthority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
SIGNED (Property Owner)
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY O~NELLAS
Sworn to an subscribed before me this ::2 t) day of
. A.D., 1iI2tJo/ to me and/or
by . /VI, .I, '#0(,1 c.e -;r...... . who@ persona!.!V
/krlowrJlas produced
as identification.
SIGNED (Property Owner)
FFIOAL N ARYSEAL
DANIEL W STEEG
NOTAlY PUBUC STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSION NO. cC638622
MY COMMISSION EXP. APR. 26~1
SIGNED (Property Owner)
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E. D. ARMSTRONG III
JOHN T. BLAKELY
BRUCE H. BOKOR
GUY M. BURNS
JONATHAN S. COLEMAN
MICHAEL T. CRONIN
ROBERT M. DAISLEY
ELIZABETH J. DANIELS
MARION HALE
SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R. JAKES
TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.
SHARON E. KRICK
ROGER A. LARSON
JOHN R. LAWSON, JR..
TRACY E. LEDUC
MICHAEL G. LITTLE
MICHAEL C. MARKHAM
STEPHANIE T. MARQUARDT
A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL
F. WALLACE POPE, JR.
ROBERT V. POTTER, JR.
AUDREY B. RAUCHW A Y
DONALD P. REED
DARRYL R. RICHARDS
PETER A. RIVELLINI
DENNIS G. RUPPEL"
CHARLES A. SAMARKOS
PHILIP M. SHASTEEN
JOAN M. VECCHIOLI
STEVEN H. WEINBERGER
AMBER F. WILLIAMS
JULIUS J. ZSCHAU
.OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO. 103901
September 20,2001
Ms. Lisa Fierce
Development Review Manager
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Gray Dolphin Case No. FL01-08-26, Application for Flexible Development
Dear Ms. Fierce:
I have filed an Application for Flexible Development requesting an amendment to
the application filed under Case No. FL 01-06-28 in the above-referenced case. That
application was heard by the Community Development Board and approved as to all
matters, except as to the fifty-foot height request. and the dock site plan. I have since
filed an amendment request asking for eleven (11) units and height of fifty-(50) feet.
As part of the development of that property I will be installing docks and slip
facilities to accommodate six (6) boats. Exact placement of the dock facilities and their
dimensions are shown on the site plan filed pursuant to this Application.
Per your request I am responding to the "criteria" as established by Ordinance
Number 6795-01 as it relates to Section 3-601, paragraph 2, multi-use docks.
The request will be a "Level 2" request and it will require approval by the
Community Development Board. I provide the following criteria:
1. The dock is less than 500 square feet in deck area, but does not comply
with the dimensional requirements set forth in Section 3-601 (C)(3)(h) at section I and iii.
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757-1368
TELEPHONE: (727) 461-18]8
TELECOPIER (727) 462-0365
TAMPA OFFICE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 20,2001
Page 2
2.
section.
The dimensional requirements that I ask relief from are item i and iii of that
I. Item i requires that the multi-use docks shall be located so that no
portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into
the water than ten (10) percent of the applicant's property width
measured at the waterfront property line. Considering the width of
the property is 120 feet the setback would be 12 feet. My facility
has its tie poles approximately one foot inside the applicant's
property line.
ii. Item iii requires that the width of the docking facilities shall not
exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's
property measured at the waterfront property line. Considering the
applicants property measured at the waterfront property line is 120
feet it requires the docking facilities not to exceed 90 feet. The
applicants dock facility exceeds that width. The docking facility is
approximately 118 feet in width.
Referring to each of the criteria set forth in paragraphs (a)-(h), I can provide you
the following:
(a) Use and Compatibility.
i. The proposed docks shall be subordinate to and contribute to the
comfort, convenience or necessities of the users of the occupants of the principle use of
the property, which shall be a condominium complex having between 9 and 11 units.
ii. The proposed docks shall be in harmony with the scale and
character of adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general. Both properties lying
on either side of the subject property have docks that are accommodating boats that
shall lie perpendicular to the seawall.
iii. The proposed docks shall be compatible with dock patterns in their
general facility. Reference ii. Above.
(b) Impacts on Existinq Water Recreation Facilities. The use of the proposed
docks shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently
using adjacent waterways for recreation and/or commercial uses. Furthermore, the
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 20,2001
Page 3
docks shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent waterway by uses
including but not limited to non-motorized boats and motorized boats.
(c) Impacts on Naviqation. The existence and use of the proposed docks
shall not have a detrimental affect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation,
transportation, recreation or other public conveniences.
(d) Impacts on Marine Environment.
I. The docks have been designed and are sited to insure that boat
access routes avoid injury to marine aspects or other aquatic resources in the
surrounding areas.
ii. The docks will not have an adverse impact upon natural marine
habitats, grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life or establish
marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of the type useful as nursery or feeding
grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries; natural reefs, and any such artificial reef
which has developed in associated in flora and fauna which have been determined to
be approaching a typical natural assemblance structure in both density and diversity;
oyster beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting sites, commercial or sport fisheries or
shell fisheries areas and habitats desirable as juvenile fish habitats.
e. Impacts on Water Quality.
i. All turning basin, access channels, boat mooring areas and any
other area associated with the dock has adequate circulation and existing water depths
to insure that a minimum of one-foot clearance is provided between the lowest member
of a vessel (e.g. skegs, rudder, prop) and the bottom of the water body at mean or
ordinary low water (minus 0.95 NGVD datum).
ii. The dock does not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm
drainage, shoaling of channels, or adversely effect the water quality presently existing
in the area or limit progress that is being made toward improvement of water quality in
the area in which the dock is proposed to be located.
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 20,2001
Page 4
f. Impacts on Natural Resources.
i. The dock does not have any material adverse impact upon the
conservation of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and
shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest.
ii. The dock does not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas;
vegetative, terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species
providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such as range,
nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or physical attributes which
would serve to make them rare within the confines of the City; designated preservation
areas such as those identified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, National Wildlife
Refuges, Florida outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird
sanctuaries.
g. Impacts on Wetlands, Habitats/Uplands. The dock does not have
immaterial adverse affect upon the upland surrounding.
h. Dimensional Standards.
i. Setbacks. requires that the multi-use docks shall be located so that no
portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into the water than 10%
of the applicant's property where measured at the waterfront property line. The
applicant's dock facility has its tie poles approximately one-foot inside the Applicant's
property line.
ii. Lenqth. The length of the commercial and multi-use docks
shall not extend from the mean high waterline or seawall of the Applicant's property
more than 75% of the width of the Applicant's property measured at the waterfront
property line. The Applicant's width of property is 120-feet. 75% of the width would be
gO-feet. The docks will not extend beyond that distance. Tie poles may extend beyond
the dock provided that such poles do not extend 25% of the width of the waterway and
do not constitute a navigational hazard. The tie poles will not extend 25% of the width
of the waterway and will not constitute a navigational hazard.
iii. Width. The width of the multi-use facilities will exceed 75% of the
width of the Applicant's property measured at the waterfront property line due to the fact
that the tie holes are at approximately 1-foot inside the Applicant's property line.
.
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
A TTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LA W
Ms. Lisa Fierce
September 20,2001
Page 5
IV. Covered Boat Lifts. The covered boatlift will not be constructed.
v. Deviations. A deviation from these requirements with respect to i.
and iii., above must be considered and approved by the Community Development
Board.
This fully responds to the criteria of Ordinance 6795-01.
I have attached the inspection report of Thomas R. Cuba, PhD, CEP, FREP to
support the conclusions in this letter as they relate to items (a) through (g).
cc: Mark Parry (VIA E-MAIL)
#247369 v1 - Larson/GrayDolphin/Ltr. to Fierce/RAUrms
1-
.
.
Ecological Site Assessment
and
Criteria Review
Prepared by Delta Seven Inc.
September 20,20011
Owner:
Roger A. Larson
Badger Properties, LLP
#5 Island Park Place, Unit 308
Dunedin, FL34698
Site Identification:
The property is located in Section 8, Township 29 S, Range 15 E: In the County of Pine lIas and
within the municipal boundaries of the City of Clearwater.
PID: 08-29-15-43398-000-0100
Platted as Lots 10 and 11 , Unit 5A, Island Estates of Clearwater PB 60, Pg51
Location:
The lot has no known street address (undeveloped) and is located at the southern end of the cuI
de sac of Dolphin Point Rd. A location map has been attached.
General Upland Conditions:
The upland area is a vacant lot sodded and having several palm trees. The wetland boundary is
made by a concrete seawall which extends the full width ofthe property: 120.25 linear feet at the
seawall (per legal description).
The general condition of the seawall appeared good, there being no significant and obvious
failures. 2
1 Updated version of draft submittal to City of Clearwater on September 9, 2001.
2 This is not a statement of inspection but rather the general impression of the field reviewer.
.
.
General Wetland Conditions:
The waters associated with the property are the fully submerged marine habitats and the intertidal
zone along the vertical face of the seawall.
The seawall supports heavy growth of sessile marine organisms dominated by the oyster,
Crassostrea virginica. The depth from the intertidal to the base of the seawall is such that the
population does not extend to the bottom. The fully submerged portion of the site is nearly
entirely composed of soft marine muds. No vegetation, either macro-algae or vascualr grasses,
were observed. One colony (1 0 individuals) of the common purple sea rod (a Gorgonian of the
genus Leptogorgia) was located growing on a piece of hard substrate, of unidentifiable type or
origin. Based on the color and clarity of the water column, it supported a heavy planktonic algal
concentration.
The colony of gorgonians and the hard substrate was located approximately 15 feet from the
seawall in about 6 feet of water. The exact location relative to the planned dock was not
determined. This species ofGorgonian (Leptogorgia) is highly resilient and does well in heavily
turbid waters such as these (The water clarity at the time of inspection was approximately one
footV The most robust member of the colony was approximately 20 em in height and 3 mm in
diameter. The colony had no discernible associated organisms.
Description ofIntended Use:4
Badger Properties intends to develop the upland portion of the site as condominiums and to install
a docking facility with 6 slips large enough to accommodate vessels generally in the 40 foot class.
The dock structure as proposed includes two free standing piers and one pier extending from a
marginal wooden deck. The latter is to be approximately 43 feet by 5 feet and will be located on
the eastern section of the waterfront (215 sq ft). The attached pier is to be 35 feet by 3 feet (105
sq ft). The two fr~. ding piers are 40 feet by 3 feet (120 each or 240 sq ft.). The total deck
surface is to be~_f!)
Satisfaction of Municipal Criteria. City of Clearwater Municipal Code Section 3-601 (Ordinance
6795-01).
The structure being applied for is consistent with the description of a multi-use dock (Section
1.C.2) in that it is to be owned in common by the condominium owners and is to be used
exclusively by the residents of the condominium. The dimensions as shown on the submitted site
3 Due to the limited visibility, the entire 120 x 40 foot bottom could not be inspected. Transects were
swam by divers from the channel to the wall in four locations and then parallel to the wall in two locations.
4 The assessments contained herein are based on the intended use as understood at the time of the
evaluation.
.
.
plan have resulted in the estimated 560 square foot of deck coverage. Badger properties has
expressed an interest in limiting the deck coverage to no more than 500 sq ft and this minor
discrepancy will be corrected on the next submittal.
Until such time as the revisions are made, however, the structure is subject to the criteria ofa
Commercial dock (Section 1.C.3, line 9).
Section 1.CA.a: The statements contained within the August 28, 2001 letter from the owner to
Ms. Lisa Fierce adequately address this requirement.
Section 1.CA.b: The impacts of the proposed structure on the existing water recreation activities
are not expected to be discernible. The structure is located along one shore ofa small cove (see
map) not generally used for recreational purposes. The majority of the use within this cove is
related to the marina along the southern shore. The addition of these six slips will not appreciably
increase boating traffic within the cove. The cove is not currently congested. The proposed
structure will not extend beyond the limits of the existing structures to either side.
Section 1.CA.c: The addition of six slips at this location will not have an adverse impact to
navigation. The slips do not extend further into the waterway than those of the neighboring
properties. Mandalay channel is located immediately to the west of the entrance to the cove and
easy access to general navigation is readily available.
Section 1.CA.d: The natural resources identified are marine muds, the oyster colony, and the
Gorgonian colony. Of these the muds are normally afforded little priority under the regulations
and are not considered to be a habitat at risk. The Oysters on the seawall typically survive the
addition of boat slips and continue to thrive in these habitats. It must be noted that these colonies
are always sub climax as they are periodically subjected to seawall repair and replacement. The
time to re-establish viable assemblages is typically one growing season. The last resource, the
Gorgonians, is small (less than 4 square feet) and is not likely to be contributing greatly to the
ecology of the area. The lack of typically associated organisms (Poriferans and macro-algae)
indicates a stressed and less than optimally productive association. Its removal is not expected to
have a negative impact on the resources as listed in the criteria of the section.
Section 1.CA.e: Power vessels in the 35 foot class typically will not draw more than 3 feet and
sailing vessels will not draw more than 6 feet. There is ample depth throughout the slip to
accommodate these drafts. Please see the water depth information submitted separately. In light
of the fact that the rest of the shore of this cove is already used for dock structures, any additional
impacts normally associated with docks are not anticipated to be significant.
Section 1.CA.f: This item has been addressed under the response to section d above with the
exception of the affects on Outstanding Florida Waters and Bird Sanctuaries. The deed to the site
in the name of the owner removes it from the Pinellas County Aquatic Preserves and therefore
removes it from any status as an Outstanding Florida Water. There are no known impacts to bird
sanctuaries or their ability to provide habitat for birds that would result form this structure.
.
.
Section I.CA.g: The dock will not have an adverse affect on the uplands. The vacant lot is
scheduled for development as condominiums.
Section l.CA.h: The structure does not meet all of the criteria of this section. The structure does
meet criteria ii and as such does not represent a navigational hazard. The existing neighboring
structures within the cove do not meet the criteria as stated in the new ordinance and to waive
them as requested would be in keeping with the general character of the neighborhood. Badger
properties has formally requested relief from these criteria (August 28, 2001 letter from the owner
to Ms. Lisa Fierce adequately address this requirement).
_...........,"'\
_--t>-I)\:MY Of: \,
- 't-\. ........ $0 'h
,.. ~ ..' ". ~ f
;'~....Cl'!'"""... p'. ....~.,
.-. ~";'l- '.,
~ A ~: ~- ~ J
~ /! ~ THOMA~3"FCCUBi\..~
Th R C b PhD I....:".....o..............,;....,~
omas . u a, . I . ~t'.l08 .: (~ :J
Certified Environmental Pr~l&~i~ ~~ ..<.j:.,-,i
t:~/}.. ERTl'i ,t-_ " '-'.:"' d
" v'/!~,f.'i': 01..... ~...' ~ ,. ~<.":."?:';,;.,-'
\\?::~"i!fr4r P\\\\~" :,.,;.;p
"~~'t.-~e...'~~'""~
Prepared by,
.
.
General Environmental Consulting
Thomas R. Cuba, PhD.
Delta Seven, Inc.
P.O. Box 3241
St. Petersburg, FL
33731
Ph: 727-823-2443
Fx: 727-550-2513
Tom.Cuba@Delta-Seven.com
www.Delta-Seven.com
Florida Registered
Professional Environmental
Corporation
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
RE: Depth Soundings at Gray Dolphin: Badger Properties.
Terry,
At the DRC meeting September 13, we were asked to develop water depth profiles using
soundings. This memo is to attest that on Friday, September 14, Tom Home and myself
conducted soundings of the project area. We placed 3 temporary range marks on the shore at the
top of the sea wall. These were located at the center survey pin (known location and elevation)
and thirty measured feet to either side. We then stood off the wall 25 and 50 feet in line with
these marks and took soundings using sonar. We took one sounding five feet off the wall at the
pin for a near shore depth. Having dove the entire area, I was aware of the generally flat nature
of the bottom. It was my decision that these seven points would adequately reflect the general
contour.
These data were adjusted for the current water level and the depth of the transducer below the
water line of the boat. Water depths referenced to NGVD were thus calculated and provided to
the engineer for notation on the plan sheets. This does not constitute a legal survey conducted by
a Licensed Land Surveyor but is consistent with the extent of your request.
Respectfully,
~~d-
ThomasR.Cuba,PhD,CEP,FREP
President, Delta Seven Inc.
.
.
Gray Dolphin
Second Addendum
to the
Ecological Site Assessment
and
Criteria Review
Prepared by Delta Seven Inc.
October 9, 2001
f.Il.E
This addendum is submitted to augment the first report of September 9, 2001 and the depth data
(first addendum) filed separately.
Owner:
Roger A. Larson
Badger Properties, LLP
#5 Island Park Place, Unit 308
Dunedin, FL34698
Site Identification:
PID: 08-29-15-43398-000-0100
DescriptionofIntended Use:
In the first report dated September 9, 2001, it was reported that the proposed facility would be
approximately 560 sq ft. It was also noted that the owner's intention was that the total square
footage was to be kept below 500 square feet. It was subsequently learned that the graphic from
which the larger figure was calculated was not prepared to the design scale. This led to the
miscalculation by both city staff and Delta Seven, Inc. The actual design square footage of deck
is to be 499 square feet. The revised site plan reflects these figures.
Respectfully Submitted,
~fi~
Thomas R. Cuba, Ph.D., CEP, CLM, FREP
President, Delta Seven Inc
.
.
General Environmental Consulting
Thomas R. Cuba, PhD.
Delta Seven, Inc.
P.O. Box 3241
St. Petersburg, FL
33731
Ph: 727-823-2443
Fx: 727-550-2513
Tom.Cuba@Delta-Seven.com
www.Delta-Seven.com
Florida Registered
Professional Environmental
Corporation
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
(C(Q)[F)W
RE: Depth Soundings at Gray Dolphin: Badger Properties.
Terry,
At the DRC meeting September 13, we were asked to develop water depth profiles using
soundings. This memo is to attest that on Friday, September 14, Tom Home and myself
conducted soundings of the project area. We placed 3 temporary range marks on the shore at the
top of the sea wall. These were located at the center survey pin (known location and elevation)
and thirty measured feet to either side. We then stood off the wall 25 and 50 feet in line with
these marks and took soundings using sonar. We took one sounding five feet off the wall at the
pin for a near shore depth. Having dove the entire area, I was aware of the generally flat nature
of the bottom. It was my decision that these seven points would adequately reflect the general
contour.
These data were adjusted for the current water level and the depth of the transducer below the
water line of the boat. Water depths referenced to NGVD were thus calculated and provided to
the engineer for notation on the plan sheets. This does not constitute a legal survey conducted by
a Licensed Land Surveyor but is consistent with the extent of your request.
Respectfully,
~
ThomasR.Cuba,PhD,CEP,FREP
President, Delta Seven Inc.
OCT-09-200l 02:35 PM DELTA SEYEN INC
.
727 550 2513
.
P.Ol
o ~ & ~ 0 fY7 [€,01
OCT u 2001 J&
~~ 1
ii'~,~ Oft' . ,';;~
)F ('/ : . ,-, :/;;:.)T S'/CS
. ~t,'"\iAIEn
General Environmental C
Ph: 727-823-2443
Fax: 727-550-2513
www.Delta.Seven.com
Postoffice@Delta-Seven.com
Fl.LE
Name:
Orpnlzation:
FaJu
Phone:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Papl: _
L ,:r;tl{. 2:: '
l'4-,,.~ ~,t,.M.;r
rJ.t v,~r
rlfl Vr'1
7:&Mi1 ~A.,
;;'~I
=~ _ _ ~it1
:J
Comments:
I
i
i__
OCT-09-2001 02:35 PM
DELTA SEVEN INC
.
,"27 550 2513
.
P.02
Gray Dolphin
Second Addendum
to the
Ecological Site Assessment
and
Criteria Review
Prepared by Delta Seven Inc.
October 9,2001
This addendum is submitted to augment the first report of September 9,2001 and the depth data
(first addendum) filed separately.
Owner:
Roger A. Larson
Badger Properties, LLP
#5 Island Park Place, Unit 308
Dunedin, FL34698
Site Identification:
PlD: 08-29-1S-43398-000-0100
DescriotionofTntended Use:
In the first report dated September 9, 2001, it was reported that the proposed fucility would be
approximately 560 sq ft. It was also noted that the owner's intention was that the total square
footage was to be kept below 500 square feet. It was subsequently learned that the graphic from
which the larger figure was calculated was not prepared to the design scale. This led to the
miscalculation by both city staffand Delta Seven, Inc. The actual design square footage of deck
is to be 499 square feet. The revised site plan reflects these figures.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~"-
Thomas R. Cuba, Ph.D., CEP, eLM, FREP
President, Delta Seven Inc
OCT-09-2001
02 :36 PI1
eTA
SEVEN INC
727 550
.
2513
P.03
CZ Della;)
General Environmental Consulting
Thomas R. Cuba, PhD.
Delta Seven. Inc.
P,O. BOl( 3241
St. Petersburg, FL
33731
Ph: 727-823-2443
Fx: 727-SS0-2513
Tom.Cuba@Delta-Seven.com
www.Delta-Seven.com
Florida Registered
Professional Environmental
Corporation
Terry Finch
City of Clearwater
(C(Q)[?)V
RE: Depth Soundings at Gray Dolphin: Badger Propert.ies.
Tet1)',
At the DRe meeting September 13, we were asked to develop water depth profiles using
soundings. This memo is to attest that on Friday, September 14, Tom Horne and 11lyself
conducted soundings of the project area. We placed 3 temporary range marks 011 the shore at the
top of the sea wall. These were located at the center survey pin (known location and elevation)
and thirty measured feet to either side. We then stood off the wall 25 and 50 feet in line with
these marks and took soundings using sonar. We took one sounding five feet off the wall at the
pin tOr a near shore depth, Having dove the entire area, 1 wa$ aware of the generally flat nature
of the bottom. It was my decision that these seven points would adequately reflect the general
contour.
These data were adjusted for the current water level and the depth of the transducer below the
water line of the boat. Water depths referenced to NOVD were thus cakulated aJld provided to
the engineer fur notation on the plan sheets. This does not constitute a legal survey conducted by
a Licensed Land Surveyor but is con$istent with the extent of your request.
Respectfully,
~
Thomas R. Cuba, PhD, CEP, FREP
President, Delta Seven Inc.
.
.
P.04
AUTOMATIC COVER SHEET
DATE
: OCT-09-2001 02:36 PM
TO
.
.
FAX
n: 5624865
FROM: DELTA SEVEN INC
FAX n: 727 550 2513
4 PAGES WERE SENT
(INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
d~Si
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING and
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING
SERVICES
INCORPORATED
Mr. Roger Larson
#5 Island Park Place
Unit 308
Dunedin, Florida 34698
July 20,2001
RE: Report of the Geotechnical Investigation
Dolphin Cove Condominiums
Dolphin Point Drive
Clearwater, Florida
Our File: DES 014114
Dear Mr. Larson:
Pursuant to your request and authorization, DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES,
INC. has completed the subsur[ace soil investigation [or the subject project. The [ollowing
pages of this repOli present the results of our field and laboratory studies including
recommendations for foundation design.
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
STRUCTURE AREA BORINGS - To identify subsurface conditions within the proposed
structure area, a combined program of two (2) Standard Penetration Test borings and two (2)
classification or hand auger borings was perfonned. The SPT borings were advanced to a depth
of 40 feet below existing grade. The Standard Penetration method of sampling and testing was
utilized to obtain soil samples for visual classification and laboratory testing. The method also
provides Standard Penetration resistance data reflective of the strength and bearing capability of
the soils penetrated. The hand auger borings were advanced to a depth of 8.5 feet below present
grade. The hand auger process provides soil information continuously from below existing grade
to the completion depth ofthe boring.
Sarasota
941/371-3949
Fax:941/371-8962
Clearwater
P.O. 80x 17839. Clearwater. Florida 33762
12220 49th Street North. Clearwater. Florida 33762
727/571-1313. Fax: 727/572-4090
e-mail: desiclwtr@aol.com
Tampa
813/948-6027
Fax: 813/948-7645
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\.
'.
2
The approximate boring locations are illustrated on Plate I in the report appendix. Also
included in the report appendix are logs of the soil borings. The boring logs present visual and
estimated Unified Soil Classification with depth as well as groundwater information. Also
included is a brief description of this method of sampling and testing.
LABORA TORY TESTING - A limited laboratory classification test program was
implemented in the laboratory to check the engineering characteristics ofrepresentative soil
samples collected during our investigation. The classification tests included one (l) Atterberg
limits determination and two (2) grainsize or sieve analyses. The results of the tests are listed on
the attached Summary of Laboratory Test Results sheet. Also included in the report appendix are
individual gradation curves illustrating the percent passing various U.S. Standard sieves versus
nominal particle size.
INDICATED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Based on topographic information, existing grade varies from approximate El. +5.5 :i: feet
to El. +6.5 :i: feet (NGYD).
The exploratory borings identified the presence of brown and gray fine sands with
variable silt fines content to depths of 4 to 8 feet below present grade. Below the upper fine
sands and silty sands, the borings encountered an interbedded unit of gray silty sands, clays and
sandy silts to a depth of 14 feet. Below 14 feet, a gray and dark gray sandy silt and silty clay was
sampled to the surface of the limestone formation 33 to 34 feet below surrounding grade. The
limestone, which varied in consistency, continued to the completion depth of the borings.
Penetration resistance data suggests a loose to medium dense relative density within the
upper 4 to 6 feet. The sands, silts and clays penetrated below 4 0 6 feet revealed predominantly a
very loose or very soft consistency to the surface of the limestone formation.
Groundwater was observed at the boring locations at depths ranging from 3.8 to 3.9 feet
below existing grade. It should be noted that the field investigation was conducted during a
period of moderate rainfall. Fluctuations in groundwater levels should certainly be anticipated
due to variations in rainfall and tidal fluctuations.
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
.
3
GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
STRUCTURE TYPE AND LOADING CONDITIONS - It is our understanding the planned
construction will be a four-story structure incorporating ground level parking. The footprint of
the building is about 6,000 square feet. It is our understanding the structure will incorporate
concrete construction. Based on inforn1ation provided by Mr. Steve Spencer, the project
architect, maximum column loads should be on the order of 450 kips. Further, we would
anticipate that only minor leveling fill will be necessary to develop the finished floor elevation.
FOUNDATION CONDITIONS - Our geotechnical studies have identified the presence of a
limestone formation that is overlain by a thick stratum of loose and very soft sandy silts and
clays with increased compressibility characteristics. Due to the presence of these very soft soils,
unacceptable total and differential settlement will result where shallow foundations are utilized.
Therefore, a pile foundation system is necessary for structure support. Structures supported on
pile foundations derive load carrying capacity by friction in the overburden soils and a
combination of friction and end bearing within the underlying limestone. Pile types
subsequently discussed are driven displacement piles, auger-cast piles and drilled shafts.
Driven Pile Foundations - Driven, prestressed concrete piles are technically feasible
for support of the structure. Nominall1-inch and 14-inch prestressed concrete piling
should be capable of sustaining compression loads of 40 and 60 tons, respectively. Based
upon the test borings, driven pile penetrations will probably require penetrations in the
range of 35 to 40 feet below the existing ground surface. However, due to the close
proximity of existing structures, there is significant risk with respect to vibration induced
damage. The risk of vibration related settlements on the adjacent property may be
lessened provided the neighboring structures are supported on deep foundations.
However, vibrations and noise may be objectionable to occupants of the buildings.
Therefore, because of the increased risks, this option may not be viable.
Au~er-Cast Piline - As an alternative to driven piling, auger-cast piles have been
utilized successfully. This alternative pile foundation results in a relatively vibration-
free installation. The auger-cast pile is installed utilizing a continuous flite auger which
is advanced to refusal in the underlying limestone formation followed by the injection of
grout as the continuous flite auger is slowly withdrawn to the ground surface. We would
anticipate that nominal 14-inch and 16-inch diameter auger-cast piles installed to refusal
within the underlying limestone formation should be capable of developing an axial
compressive design capacity of up to 40 tons and 50 tons, respectively. We would expect
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
4
refusal to occur at an average depth of 35 to 40 feet. Penetration will vary depending
upon the depth to competent limestone. Refusal is defined as a penetration of less than 1
foot per minute.
Quality assurance and testing is warranted to confirm the required design capacities and
the capability of the contractor's installation equipment. In this regard, it is recommended
that at least five (5), pilot augers be performed throughout the project limits in an effort
to assess the general uniformity of subsurface conditions. Based upon the results of the
pilot augers, a single pile location will be selected for compression load testing. The
compression test pile should be tested to a minimum of twice the design load in
accordance with ASTM D-1143.
The auger-cast piles should be installed under the continuous inspection of a qualified
geotechnical engineer or geotechnician. The purpose of this inspection is to monitor the
drilling depths and drilling resistance to confirm that the required auger-cast pile
penetration is being achieved and to confirm the grout pressures and volumes. Variations
in observed drilling consistencies may warrant modification in auger-cast penetration
requirements by the geotechnical engineer. In addition, grout samples must also be
secured on a daily basis to check the compressive strength of the grout for comparison to
specification requirements.
It should be noted that the potential exists that pervious zones and crevices above and
within the limestone formation can result in an increased volume of grout required to
complete the auger-cast pile. The magnitude of these grout overruns cannot be reliably
estimated. Nevertheless, experience suggests that grout overruns on the order of 50% of
the theoretical grout volume as an average throughout a project is not unreasonable.
Typically, auger-cast piling contractors will submit their bids based upon an assumed
grout volume not in excess of about 15 to 20% of the theoretical grout volume. Anything
in excess of this, they would charge a price per cubic yard. Certainly, the bid prices of
the auger-cast piling contractor should be carefully scrutinized to examine the basis of
their bid and the prices for overage in grout that may ultimately be required.
Drilled Shaft Foundations - A third concept suggested is drilled shaft foundations.
Drilled shafts derive their primary capacity by frictional resistance in the limestone
fom1ation. A single shaft can be used for column support, thus eliminating the need for
multiple piles and pile caps. We would anticipate that nominal 24-inch drilled shafts
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
'.
5
penetrating 12 to 15 'feet into competent limestone should be capable of sustaining loads
of 450 kips or more.
The large diameter shafts would also have a higher lateral load and uplift capacity
compared to driven or auger-cast piling. Drilled shaft foundations will also necessitate a
single pilot boring at each foundation location to check the embedment requirements for
each foundation. In other words, the drilled shaft embedment will determined on a shaft
by shaft basis based on actual design column loads.
During the construction of drilled shaft foundations, significant overages in concrete can
also be experienced similar to that of the auger-cast pile concept. As with the auger-cast
piles, the drilled shaft contractor's bid should be examined closely with respect to
potential extras associated with increased concrete volume.
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. appreciates the opportunity to assist
you on this project at this preliminary stage. Should you have any questions concerning the
results of our preliminary geotechnical studies, please do not hesitate to contact this office at
your convemence.
Respectfully submitted,
DRIGGERS NGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
ime Driggers, P.E.
resident
FI Registration 16989
WSD/FJD/wsd
WSD-REP\014114
Copies submitted: (4)
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
.
APPENDIX
PLATE I - BORING LOCATION PLAN
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOGS
HAND AUGER BORING LOGS
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
GRAINSIZE ANALYSES
METHOD OF TESTING
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
.
PLATE I - BORING LOCATION PLAN
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
~
.& HAND AUGER BORING LOCATION
S STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOCATION
~-......
/
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
~
......
......
~
I
FIlaD 1.lLaat:
<>
hj
SCALE: 1" = 40'
o
o
a
DRAWN BY / CHECKED BY SHEET TITLE PROJECT NO. DATE
R.D.B. / N. T.K. BORING LOCA TION PLAN DES 014114 7 /20 /01
PREPARED BY PROJECT NAME CAD FILE NAME SHEET NO.
DOLPHIN POINT CONDOMINIUMS N: \ACL TWIN\
ISLAND ESTATES PLA TE
PLA TE1 \014114BSIZE
CLEARWA TER FLORIDA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOGS
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
-=I~-~'i ) /
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED
Project No. DES014114 BORING NO. B-1
Project Dolphin Point; Island Estates; Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman
Completion Depth To
Depth 41.5' Date 7/6/01 Water 3.8' Time
I-
u.
J:
l-
ll.
W
Cl
0::: Ii
ZWI-
o a. en
eno:::z
3:ww
o~a.
...J:i:O:::
to <(0
en:
CD
...J en
o W
to ...J
:i: a.
>- :i:
en <(
en
SOIL DESCRIPTION
o
SURF. EL:
Light brown slightly silty Fine SAND
with roots (SP-SM)
\ Very lioht orav Fine SAND (SP)
Medium dense light brownish-gray
sliohtlv siltv Fine SAND with shell (SP)
Medium dense light gray Fine SAND (SP)
f t~~~::
. .....
... ....
5
. :'7: \I.
.7.:V..i
~.~:..,.:
:v.:7.' ~
..J
"'r
Loose gray silty Fine SAND (SM)
10
Very soft dark gray sandy SILT
with trace of shell fragments (MH)
Very loose dark gray silty Fine SAND
with trace of shell fragments (SM)
Very loose grayish-brown Fine SAND (SP)
15
Very soft dark gray clayey SILT
with trace of shell fragments (MH)
20
0/0/2
D.P.
Date 7/6/01
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30" DROP
10 20 40 60 80
25 : Very soft gray sandy SIL T (MH)
.. 0/0/2
:
..
:
..
~ Firm dark gray CLAY (CH)
30
~ 0/2/3 ~
~
~ ~'-
~ Cream colored clayey LIMESTONE ~
Remarks Borehole Grouted
Casing Length
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
11:::I ~~ i
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED
Project No. DES 014114 BORING NO. B-1
Project Dolphin Point; Island Estates; Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman D.P.
Completion Depth To
Depth 41.5' Date 7/6/01 Water 3.8' Time Date 7/6/01
0::0::
I- UJ zWI- STANDARD
u.. ...I Oc..UJ PENETRATION TEST
0 W SOIL DESCRIPTION UJo::z
J: OJ ...I BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
I- ~ c.. ::ww
c.. >- ~ O~c.. SAMPLER-140 LB.
W UJ <( ...I~O:: HAMMER, 30" DROP
c UJ OJ<(O
SURF. EL: UJ= 10 20 40 6080
co
35 gJ Cream colored clayey LIMESTONE T I ",
19/50* * 0.4' Penetration
~
~
~ /
40 ~ /
21/16/12 .
.,..J-
45
50
55
60
65
Remarks
Casing Length
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
-=I~~i \
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES
INCORPORA TED
Project No. DES 014114 BORING NO. B-2
Project Dolphin Point; Island Estates; Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman
Completion Depth To
Depth 40.8' Date 7/6/01 Water 3.9' Time
00 Very loose gray clayey Fine SAND (SC)
07
30 ;Y.';Y.;Y."
;Y.';Y.;Y."
'!7Zl.
:~l.l.:?
0Z?
;7/1
l-
LL
J:
l-
e..
W
Cl
o
. 1.....,._
~.~rJl:I...
.:'<:'17:
:~:9:
5
J....l.{l:I{
'sp*
0.j~:~
10 ~.~\~:
I:...!. ',',:~
r:t.J:r: t.
:~1~~~
It; :1:',:
1:0,,'J:
I: i ~ :, :,:
15
20 ..
25 .. .: ,
D.P.
Date 7/6/01
..J 00
o W
al ..J
~ e..
>- ~
00 <(
00
c::ti
zWI-
Oe..OO
ooc::z
3:ww
O~e..
..J~C::
al<(O
00:
co
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30" DROP
10 20 40 60 80
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SURF. EL:
Light brown slightly silty Fine SAND
\with roots (SP-SM)
\ Light brownish-gray Fine SAND
\with shell (SP)
Loose arav and dark aray silty Fine SAND (SM)
Firm dark gray silty CLAY (CH)
5/5/5
7
2/4/2 ,/
2/3/2 ~
/
2/1/2 II
2/1/3 It
3/2/4 ~
7
/
0/0/0
Very loose dark gray slightly silty Fine SAND
with shell (SP-SM)
Loose gray slightly silty Fine SAND (SP-SM)
Very soft dark gray silty CLAY
with trace of shell fragments (CH)
Very soft to soft dark gray to gray
sandy SILT (MH)
0/0/2
0/1/2
0/1/2
'-............
......................
............
Remarks Borehole Grouted
Casing Length
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1::I~~i
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED
Project No. DES 014114 BORING NO. B-2
Project Dolphin Point; Island Estates; Clearwater, Florida
Location See Plate I Foreman D.P.
Completion Depth To 7/6/01
Depth 40.8' Date 7/6/01 Water 3.9' Time Date
0::0::
I- m zWI- STANDARD
LL. .J Oc..~ PENETRATION TEST
0 W
.J SOIL DESCRIPTION mO::z
:!: m c.. 3:ww BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
I- :E
c.. :E O~c.. SAMPLER-140 LB.
W >- <( .J:EO::
c m m m<(O HAMMER, 30" DROP
SURF. EL: m: 10 20 40 6080
co
35 ~ Cream colored clayey LIMESTONE I I
50* * 0.5' Penetration
,....,
:;i
.L..,.
~
5
40 ~
25/50* * 0.3' Penetration
45
50
55
60
65
Remarks
Casing Length
I.
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
HAND AUGER BORING LOGS
.
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
-=I~~i
DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
IN CORPORA TED
HAND AUGER BORING LOG
PROJECT: uOlpnln I-'Olnt CLIENT:
Island Estates Roger Larson
Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE:
DES 014114 3.8' 7/6/01
TECHNICIAN: DATE: T COMPLETION DEPTH:
S.E./D.P. 7/6/01 8.5'
LOCATION: TEST NUMBER:
See Plate I HA-1
...I
ELEV. DEPTH 0
DESCRIPTION aI REMARKS
(FT) (FT) ::
>-
Ul
Light brown slightly silty Fine SAND 0 'I:n"'i_
I\"~' .
with roots (SP-SM) ~ '1-1.'1'
Jj' . .
." .1:..11;
'r~:r-; '1
. ..x:.
'.I:I:..t'<ll
Light brownish-gray Fine SAND . .0..
"Y'. :"7: .
with shell (SP) . :-v: 'V.
Light brownish-gray Fine SAND 2 V
with thin seams of CLAY (SP/CH) ::' V
Gray silty Fine SAND (SM) : . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
Light brownish-gray Fine SAND (SP) . . . .
4
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. .
. .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
. .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. .
6 . .
.. . .
. . . .
. .
. . . .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
. .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
8 . .
.. . .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
10
12
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
-=lE!~i
DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
IN CORPORA TED
PROJECT:
lJOlphln POint
Island Estates
Clearwater, Florida
DES 014114
HAND AUGER BORING LOG
CLIENT:
WATER TABLE:
Roger Larson
3.9'
I DATE:
7/6/01
I COMPLETION DEPTH:
8.5'
TECHNICIAN:
LOCATION:
DATE:
S.E.lD.P.
7/6/01
TEST NUMBER:
See Plate I
HA-2
Light brown slightly silty Fine SAND
with roots (SP-SM)
Light brownish-gray slightly silty
Fine SAND with shell (SP-SM)
Very light gray Fine SAND (SP)
o
...J
o
ED
::!:
>-
en
. :~: -,'-
.lVn:...f. i' ,
, :D.',
)..; : I-,l
.1"1: f r
~,g
REMARKS
ELEV,
(FT)
DESCRIPTION
DEPTH
(FT)
, "
. .'..
.... .
..... .
Light brownish-gray Fine SAND
with shell (SP)
2
."7.:"1:
"'9:~
:v. : '\7', ,
, ..
.:7:;;7.
,\j :9:
;\7:17
,<j:"1: .
:v':::'"
4
Dark gray silty CLAY (CH)
6
Gray silty Fine SAND (SM)
Dark gray silty CLAY (CH)
8
11
10
12
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
_n
.
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
ATTERBERG
BORING DEPTH DESCRIPTION W% Td G, LIMITS P.P. V.c. CON G.S. ORG pH CI. S04 RES.
NO. (ft) (pc!) (ts!) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (Ohm-em)
LL PL SL
B-1 2.0' - 3.5' Light brownish-gray slightly silty Fine SAND with shell .
B-2 4.0' - 5.5' Dark gray silty CLAY 83.5 121 44
B-2 8.0' - 9.5' Dark gray slightly silty Fine SAND with shell .
.
W% Water Content Con. Consolidation Test
T d (pet) Dry Density G.S. (+1) Grainsize Analysis (Hydrometer)
Gs Specific Gravity ORG.(%) Organic Content CLIENT: Roger Larson
LL Liquid Limit Cl. (ppm) Total Chloride
PL Plastic Limit SO, (ppm) Total Sulfate PROJECT: Dolphin Point Condominiums; Island Estates
SL Shrinkage Limit RES. (ohm-em) Lab Resistivity Clearwater, Florida
P.P. (tst) Pocket Penetrometer See Test Curves FILE: DES 014114
U.C. Unconfined Compression .. Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
GRAINSIZE ANALYSES
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
-
-
umber
B-1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
U. 5 Standard Si.w Opentn.. in Inches
U 5 SIIn<U,d S- Humbet1
Hrd
..
.c
..
.60
~
~
J Z I~ J I 14 ,. M -
I ) 4 6 10 20 JO 40 ~ 10 100 140
I I ,~ I'
r- .....
"
"'-.
\
\
\
1 --
.
\
-
.- n - - .-- .- ~ -~
--- .--"-- :
-- I -- _.. - - \
'\
. .--C _ - --- --~ --~ J ~ ,-
j I I
I
100
90
80
70
f 50
ii:
i
~ 40
l.
30
20
10
o
100
50
10
5
05
Grain Size In Millimeters
SAND
01
005
001 0005
=1
GRAVEL
L
SIL T or ClJ,V
COirit r .nr
Depth
Natural
Moisture
Roger l.arson
P.L
P. I.
LL
Classification
CLIENT:
2.0' - 3.5'
Li ht brownish- r
PROJECT:
Dolphin Point Condominiums
Island Estates; Clearwater, Florida
Fine SAND with shell
FILE:
DES 014114
-
-
-
0
10
20
30 .
E
..
40 t
,..
~
t
50 ~
~
u
C
60 ..
u
t
0..
10
80
90
100
0001
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
U. S Standard S- Open,n.. in Inches
U S St.ncU,d S- Num~
Hrd_
c
..
~ 40
cf
3 2 ,~ I I ~ ] 4 6 10 14 " 20 ]0 .0 ~ 10 100 1.0
, r-i........ I , ,
i' ~...
- ---
.
r-...
........
'-.
\
\
-
\
~--- \
\ ;
~~ .
i
I -- f---- -
I .
I--- -~- --------- T ;
! I i
100
90
80
70
~
III
ii60
~
~
~ 50
L;:
30
20
10
o
100
50
5
10
05
Grain Size In MsJilmelers
SAND
01
005
001 0005
~
L
GRAVEL
SILT or CLAY
COirse r,n~
umber
Depth
Natural
Moisture
Roger Larson
P. L
P. I.
Ll.
Classification
CLIENT:
B-2
8.0' - 9.5'
Dark gray slightly silty Fine SAND
Dolphin Point Condominiums
Island Estates; Clearwater, Florida
PROJECT:
with shell
FILE:
DES 014114
-
-
-
0
10
20
30 .
~
..
40 j
>-
&J
t
50 ~
2!
u
C
60 II
U
t
Cl.
70
80
90
100
0001
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
140 LB.
HAMMER
I
30" FALL
I
.
.
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
AND
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
w~ll1~~1l11~f[~((liir~!~ltww~~~!'i~;~lii~{i;i\'1
....:.;.:.::.::.:.:...;.;.:..:;.;.:-.::,::;;.:.:.::.s PLIT BARREL SAMPLER
....::::.::.:.:.:-:..:.:.":"::::.:.:.:.
I
I
I
WATER TABLE
I
I
MUCK
ILAYEY FINE SAND
S I L TY FINE SAND
I SHELBY TUBE
SANDY CLAY
I
CLAY
ItAYEY LIMESTONE
SANDY LIMESTONE
CORE RUN
LIMESTONE
I
I
4--"N" VALUE OR
6 BLOW COUNT
7
21
STRATUM
CHANGE
50/0.3'
LOENOTES
50 BLOWS FOR
0.3' PENETRAT I ON
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (ASTM D-1586)
In the Standard Penetration Test borings, a rotary drilling rig is
used to advance the borehole to the desired test depth. A viscous
drilling fluid is circulated through the drill rods and bit to stabilize the
borehole and to assist in removal of soil and rock cuttings up and out of
the borehole.
Upon reaching the desired test depth, the 2 inch OD. split-barrel
sampler or "split-spoon", as it is sometimes called, is attached to an N-
size drill rod and lowered to the bottom of the borehole. A 140 pound
hammer, attached to the drill string at the ground surface, is then used
to drive the sampler into the formation. The hammer is successively
raised and dropped for a distance of 30 inches using a rope and
"cathead" assembly. The number of blows is recorded for each 6 inch
interval of penetration or until virtual refusal is achieved. In the above
manner, the samples are ideally advanced a total of 18 inches. The sum
of the blows required to effect the final 12 inches of penetration is called
the blowcount, penetration resistance of "N" value of the particular
material at the sample depth.
After penetration, the rods and sampler are retracted to the ground
surface where the core sample is removed, sealed in a glass jar and
transported to the laboratory for verification of field classification and
storage.
SOIL SYMBOLS AND CLASSIFICATION
Soil and rock samples secured in the field sampling operation were
visually classified as to texture, color and consistency. Soil
classifications are presented descriptively and symbolically for ease of
interpretation. The stratum identification lines represent the
approximate boundary between soil types. In many cases, this transition
may be gradual.
Consistency of the soil as to relative density or undrained shear
strength, unless otherwise noted, is based upon Standard Penetration
resistance values of "N" values and industry-accepted standards. "N"
values, or blowcounts, are presented in both tabular and graphical form
on each respective boring log at each sample interval. The graphical
plot of blow count versus depth is for illustration purposes only and does
not warrant continuity in soil consistency or linear variation between
sample intervals.
The borings represent subsurface conditions at respective boring
locations and sample intervals only. Variations in subsurface conditions
may occur between boring locations. Groundwater depths shown
represent water depths at the dates and time shown only. The absence
of water table information does not necessarily imply that groundwater
was not encountered.
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: October 16, 2001
Case Number: FL 01-08-26
Agenda Item: El
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
PLANS REVIEWED:
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
PLAN CATEGORY:
ZONING DISTRICT:
Houle Industries, Inc.
215 Dolphin Point
Flexible Development application to amend an approved site plan
with an increase in density from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling
units, increase the height of the proposed building from 44.5 feet to
50 feet and reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet
for a multi-use dock, as part of Residential Infill Project under the
provisions of Section 2-404 and 3-601.
Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
Architectural plans submitted by Spencer and Associates
Architecture, Inc.
0.37 acres; 16,100 square feet
140 feet of width by 125 feet of depth
Vacant
Attached dwellings
RH, Residential High Classification
MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District
Page 1
.
.
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Attached dwellings
East: Attached dwellings
South: Clearwater Bay
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: High-density residential and assorted marina uses dominate the
immediate vicinity.
UPDATE:
This case was discussed at length at the August 21, 2001 Community Development Board (CDB)
meeting. The site plan approved by the Board on that date (FL 01-08-26) included a nine unit
condominium with a reduction in the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 125 feet, reduction in
the front (north) setback from 25 feet to four feet (to pavement), reduction in the rear (south)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and an increase in the height of the proposed
building from 30 feet to 44.5 feet. A few Island Estates residents expressed some opposition.
The zoning and land use of the site limit the density to 11 dwelling units. At the meeting, the
applicant indicated a desire to amend that site plan with additional dwelling units and adding a
multi-use dock. There have been no other changes the site or landscape plans. There have been
some changes to the staff report.
The request now includes an amendment to an approved site plan with an increase in density
from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling units, an increase in the height of the proposed building
from 44.5 feet to 50 feet and reducing the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet for a 500
square foot multi-use dock, as part of Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-
404 and 3-601.
ANALYSIS:
The rectangular site is 0.37 acres located on the south side of Dolphin Point, approximately 550
feet west of Larboard Way. The site consists of two lots, Lots 10 and 11, that have been
combined through a Unity of Title. Both lots are currently vacant. The site is located within a
redeveloping, residential portion of the City located directly along Clearwater Bay in the Island
Estates neighborhood. The area is defined by several, comparably-scaled condominium
developments located on similarly-sized lots which have been developed. The developments to
the east and west include two-story buildings approximately 25 to 30 feet in height.
The proposal includes the development of 11 attached dwellings within one, five-story building.
Due to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements, the first floor will be
used for parking only. The proposed building will be located 16 feet from any adjacent structure.
Twelve parking spaces will be located under the building on the ground floor with five spaces
located within the front (north) setback along Dolphin Point. The ground floor parking will not
be visible from adjacent properties. Access to the site is proposed via a single curb cut along
Dolphin Point.
Page 2
e
.
The contemporary, Mediterranean architecture of the building will include neutral-color stucco, a
standing seam, metal roof, and a significant number of windows and balconies on the north and
south elevations. The proposed landscaping will exceed the intent of Code and will include
flowering trees and shrubs providing interest throughout the year. All sight triangles will be
honored providing unblocked views to the water from adjacent sites as required by Code. All
proposed signage will need to meet current Code requirements. Amenities include a hot tub to
the rear of the building. If the hot tub is designed to be below grade and located within 18 feet of
the seawall, a variance will be required through the City's Board of Adjustment and Appeal for
Building and Flood, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The plan includes a retention pond located at the northwest comer of the site. The application,
however, did not include percolation tests that show that the pond will recover within 24 hours of
a storm event. This information must be provided to satisfy stormwater management criteria,
prior to the issuance of any permits. As provided in Section 4-406 of the Code, should
addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one
approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board
for review. The plan includes a dumpster with chute at the northwest side of the building. It
must be designed to meet Solid Waste Department requirements.
The applicant seeks to amend an approved site plan with an increase in density and height of the
proposed building. The maximum height permitted under the minimum MHDR District
standards is 30 feet. The previous site plan approved by the Board included a four-story building
at 44.5 feet in height. The only option available to the applicant is to seek a Residential Infill
Project use approval.
The request also includes a 500 square foot multi-use dock which is governed by Section 3-601
of the Code. The dock will be a total of 42 feet in width and is located on the east portion of the
site. The east side of the dock will be 2.5 feet from the side (east) property line. Six proposed,
tie poles will be located directly on the side (east) property line. No covered or uncovered
boatlifts are proposed with this application. No other variations from Code are requested. The
applicant submitted an ecological study that includes use compatibility, navigation, water quality
and natural resource impacts. It concludes that this proposal will generate few impacts on the
marine environment.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding code violations associated with this site.r
Page 3
.
.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD
IN THE MHDR, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-
401):
STANDARD PERMITTEDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units Vacant 11 units Yes
per acres (11
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 Vacant 0.63 Yes
SURFACE
RA TIO
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PROJECTS IN THE MHDR, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(Section 2-404(F)):
STANDARD PERMITTEDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 0.37 acres; 0.37 acres; Yes
16,100 square 16,100 square
feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 125 feet 125 feet Yes ·
HEIGHT 30 feet Vacant 50 feet Yes *
FRONT YARD 10 - 25 feet Vacant 4 feet (to Yes * ·
SETBACK pavement)
SIDE YARD o - 10 feet Vacant East: 10 feet Yes * ·
SETBACK West: 10 feet
REAR YARD o - 15 feet Vacant Zero feet Yes ·
SETBACK
PARKING 1 space per Vacant 17 spaces Yes
SPACES dwelling unit (11
spaces)
* The development standards for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be varied
based on the criteria specified in Section 2-404(F).
. A previous site plan was approved with reductions in lot width, front setback (to pavement)
and rear setback (to pavement).
Page 4
.
.
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ATTACHED DWELLINGS IN THE MHDR,
MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-404 (F)):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development
standards;
The proposal includes constructing an II-unit condominium building 50 feet in height.
The multi-family buildings adjacent to the east and west are approximately 25 feet in
height. A building approximately 50 feet in height exists to the east and north of the site
at the west end of Dolphin Point. There are four buildings approximately 30 feet in
height and one building 115 feet in height along Dolphin Point. The remainder of the
buildings in the area are approximately 20 feet in height. The proposed height is similar
to surrounding condominiums and will compliment the neighborhood. A majority of
these buildings have setbacks similar to or less than the proposed setbacks presented with
this application. . The request in height increase is consistent with the general character
of the area. The proposed dock is also in keeping with the neighborhood
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed variations from Code are consistent with the character of the
neighborhood. The proposed complex will likely enhance property values in the area.
The current assessed valuation of the site is $243,000. With the redevelopment
proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at $3,000,000. This increase in property
value is expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwelling use. The site is currently zoned
MHDR District, and the use is permitted within that classification.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land
uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise. There are four buildings approximately 30 feet in height and one
building 115 feet in height along Dolphin Point. A building approximately 50 feet in
height exists to the east and north of the site at the west end of Dolphin Point. The
remainder of the buildings in the area are approximately 20 feet in height. The proposed
condominium complex is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the
waterfront and Clearwater Bay. This location provides a unique opportunity to
redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that is currently underutilized.
Page 5
.
.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The architecture and amenities will enhance the area. The existing
structures in the area are similar in terms of size and scale to the proposal.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of Clearwater
Beach and Downtown Clearwater. The proposed development will play an important
role in the continuing revitalization of the beach and. The City will benefit by having an
attractive building complex located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium
buildings and landscape enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking,
access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community
character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposal includes height and setbacks that are consistent with other attached
dwellings in the neighborhood. The neighborhood consists of well-maintained, attached
dwellings. The proposal is consistent with the neighborhood and maintains a consistent
streetscape. While surrounding buildings have been well maintained, they appear dated.
The proposed development includes an attractive building that will raise the standards in
the area and should encourage like development. The proposed development will
aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater as a whole.
D. DOCK AND MARINA STANDARDS (Section 3-601):
1. Multi-Use Docks. A multi-use dock, which is any dock owned in common or used
by the residents of a multi-family development, condominium, cooperative
apartment, mobile home park or attached zero lot line development shall be
permitted as a Level One (minimum standard) use provided such dock is less than
500 square feet in deck area and complies with the dimensional standards set forth
in Section 3-601(C)(3)(h).
The proposed 500 square foot dock will be used in aSSOCiatIon with 11 attached
dwellings. The dwelling units will be located within a five-story building. There are two
buildings on either side of the subject site which have docks associated with them similar
to the proposed dock. Most of the existing docks are similar in size and scale the
proposal.
Page 6
.
.
2. Commercial Docks. A commercial dock is any dock, pier, or wharf, including
boatlifts, that is used in connection with a hotel, motel or restaurant where the slips
are not rented, leased or sold; or such facilities used in connection with a social or
fraternal club or organization and used only by its membership; or such facilities
constructed and maintained by the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County or by any
state or federal agency. Commercial docks shall only be permitted as a Level Two
(flexible development) use, which requires approval by the Community
Development Board (CDB). Any multi-use dock with a deck area exceeding 500
square feet shall be treated as a commercial dock. All commercial docks shall be
reviewed for compliance with the following criteria.
The proposed dock will have a total of 500 square feet and IS not considered a
commercial dock.
a. Use and Compatibility.
i. The proposed dock shall be subordinate to and contribute to the comfort,
Convenience or necessities of the users or the occupants of the principal use
of the property.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet
in area and not considered a commercial dock. The proposed dock is, however,
subordinate to and will contribute to the comfort and convenience of the users of
the principal use (attached dwellings). The proposed dock will be for the
exclusive use of the residents of the building.
H. The proposed dock shall be in harmony with the scale and character of
adjacent properties and the neighborhood in general.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet
in area. However, the properties on either side of the subject site have docks
similar in size, scale and location as the proposed dock. The proposal is
consistent with the character of the neighborhood.
b. Impacts on Existing Water Recreation Activities. The use of the proposed dock
shall not adversely impact the health, safety or well being of persons currently
using the adjacent waterways for recreational and/or commercial uses.
Furthermore, it shall not hinder or discourage the existing uses of the adjacent
waterway by uses including but not limited to non-motorized boats and
motorized boats.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet in
area. The proposed location of the dock is along one shore of a small cove that is not
generally used for recreational purposes. The primary use of the cove is for boat
Page 7
.
.
traffic from a nearby marina. The proposed dock is similar to surrounding docks and
will not extend beyond the limits of existing structures on either side.
c. Impacts on Navigation. The existence and use of the proposed dock shall not
have a detrimental effect on the use of adjacent waters for navigation,
transportation, and recreational or other public conveniences.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet in
area. The proposal includes a dock with six slips that will have no adverse impact to
navigation. The slips will not extend any farther into the waterway than those of
neighboring properties. Easy access to general navigation from the cove to the
channel will be maintained with this application.
d. Impacts on Marine Environment.
i. Docks shall be sited to ensure that boat access routes avoid injury to
marine grass beds or other aquatic resources in the surrounding areas.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet
in area. However, the proposed dock will be located outside any marine
grassbeds or other aquatic resources. The natural resources identified are
marine muds, an oyster colony and a colony of common purple sea rods (known
as Gorgonians). The applicant's ecological consultant agreed to relocate the
Gorgonian colony if it is determined that they will be at risk with the location of
the proposed dock.
ii. Docks shall not have an adverse impact upon natural marine habitats,
grass flats suitable as nursery feeding grounds for marine life, or
established marine soil suitable for producing plant growth of a type useful
as nursery or feeding grounds for marine life; manatee sanctuaries;
natural reefs and any such artificial reef which has developed an
associated flora and fauna which have been determined to be approaching
a typical natural assemblage structure in both density and diversity; oyster
beds; clam beds; known sea turtle nesting site; commercial or sport
fisheries or shell fisheries areas; and habitats desirable as juvenile fish
habitat.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet
in area. The only marine habitat that may be at risk are the Gorgonian colony.
The applicant's ecological consultant agreed to relocate the colony as necessary
with this application.
Page 8
.
.
e. Impacts on Water Quality.
i. The dock shall not effectively cause erosion, extraordinary storm drainage,
shoaling of channels, or adversely affect the water quality presently
existing in the area or limit progress that is being made toward
improvement of water quality in the area in which the dock is proposed to
be located.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet
in area. The proposed dock will located along an existing seawall. The area
has already been developed with numerous docks. The proposal should have no
adverse effects in regards to erosion, drainage, channels or water quality.
f. Impacts on Natural Resources.
i. The dock shall not have a material adverse impact upon the conservation
of wildlife, marine life, and other natural resources, including beaches and
shores, so as to be contrary to the public interest.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet
in area. The only marine habitat that may be at risk are the Gorgonian colony.
The applicant's ecological consultant agreed to relocate the colony as necessary
with this application.
ii. The dock shall not have an adverse impact on vegetated areas; vegetative,
terrestrial, or aquatic habitats critical to the support of listed species
providing one or more of the requirements to sustain their existence, such
as range, nesting or feeding grounds; habitats which display biological or
physical attributes which would serve to make them rare within the
confines of the City; designated preservation areas such as those identified
in the comprehensive land use plan, national wildlife refuges, Florida
outstanding waters or other designated preservation areas, and bird
sanctuaries
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet
in area. The proposal will have no impact on any vegetated areas critical to the
support of any listed species of any endangered animal.
g. Impacts on Wetlands HabitatJUplands. The dock shall not have a material
adverse affect upon the uplands surrounding.
This criterion is not applicable as the proposed dock is less than 500 square feet in
area. The proposal will have no impact on any surrounding upland area.
Page 9
.
.
h. Dimensional Standards.
i. Setbacks. All commercial and multi-use docks shall be located so that no
portion of such dock is closer to any property line as extended into the
water than ten (10) percent of the applicant's property width measured at
the waterfront property line. Multi-use private and commercial docks
abutting adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family property must be
setback a minimum of one-third (1/3) of the applicant's waterfront
property width from the adjacent waterfront single-family or two-family
property.
The proposed dock does not meet the minimum side (east) setback of 20 feet.
The proposed setback along the side (east) property line is 2.5 feet. Therefore,
the only option available is to request approval of the reduced setback as part of
a Residential Infill Project and in accordance with Section 3-601(C)(3)(H)(v)
below. The proposed 2.5-foot, side (east) setback is similar to or greater than
the common setback of the docks located on the multi-family properties
immediately to the east and west.
ii. Length. The length of commercial and multi-use docks shall not extend
from the mean high water line or seawall of the applicant's property more
than seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's property
measured at the waterfront property line. Tie poles may extend beyond
the dock provided such poles do not extend twenty-five (25) percent of the
width of the waterway and do not constitute a navigational hazard.
The dock will be 40 feet in length, where 45 feet is permitted, and meets this
criterion.
iii. Width. The width of commercial and multi-use docking facilities shall not
exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the width of the applicant's property
measured at the waterfront property line.
The proposal includes two connected docks, 40 feet in length and 2.5 feet in
width and the other dock is 40 feet in width and four feet in length. This dock
has a secondary dock extending 40 feet from the seawall, 2.5 feet in width. The
total combined width of the dock is 45 feet which is the maximum permitted by
ode. The applicant has met this criterion.
iv. Covered boatlifts. Covered boatlifts are permitted provided a permanent
and solid roof deck is constructed with material such as asphalt shingles,
metal, tile or wood. Canvas and canvas like roof materials are prohibited.
Vertical sidewalls are prohibited on any boatlift or dock.
No covered boatlifts of any kind are proposed with this application.
Page 10
.
.
v. Deviations. Deviations from the requirements of this section may be
considered and approved by the Community Development Board in order
to comply with the review criteria established in Sections 3-601(C)(3)(a) -
(g).
The applicant has applied as a Residential Infill Project in accordance with this
section (Section 3-601) and Section 2-404 (F) of the Code.
i. Publicly-owned facilities. Roof structures shall be permitted on publicly owned
boardwalks, observation platforms, elevated nature trails and other such
structures not intended for use as a dock facility, however, vertical walls shall be
prohibited.
The proposed dock is not a publicly-owned facility, therefore, this subsection is not
applicable.
E. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with high-quality, mid-rise attached dwellings on similarly-
sized lots. This proposal includes high-end condominiums with amenities. It will
continue a positive redevelopment pattern for the area. The request in an increase in the
number of dwelling units is consistent with the limitations of the underlying land use
(Residential High Classification) of 11 units per acre. The proposed height of 50 feet is
consistent with the area. There are four buildings approximately 30 feet in height and one
building 115 feet in height along Dolphin Point. A building approximately 50 feet in
height exists to the east and north of the site at the west end of Dolphin Point. The
remainder of the buildings in the area are approximately 20 feet in height. Additionally,
all properties along Dolphin Point have docks or similar structures associated with them.
Most of the existing docks are similar in size and scale the proposal.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned Medium High Density Residential District and the proposed
development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The design of the site
will include an attractive building with preserved sight views to the water and a dock for
the enjoyment of the residents.
Page 11
.
.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed II-unit, development will have one ingress/egress point of access along
Dolphin Point. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected
intersections or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads. The
requested increase in the number of dwelling units is consistent with the limitations of the
underlying land use of 11 units per acre.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity with regard to height (especially given the FEMA required first floor elevation)
and dock setbacks. Other surrounding sites have been developed with multi-story
dwellings with similar setbacks.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of a single building with a minimum of a 16-foot
view corridor between the nearest structures to the east or west. All required view
triangles will be provided. Parking in excess of Code requirements will be provided. The
dock will be located with setback consistent with the established pattern in the area.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 12, 2001. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to amend an approved site plan with an increase in density from nine
dwelling units to 11 dwelling units, increase the height of the proposed building from 44.5 feet to
50 feet and reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet for a multi-use dock, as part of
Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404 and 3-601, for the site at 215
Dolphin Point, with the following bases and conditions:
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project criteria
under the provisions of Section 2-404.
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913.
Page 12
.
.
3. The proposal complies with Flexible Development criteria for multi-use docks under the
provisions of Section 3-601.
4. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density be limited to 11 dwellings units and the height of the building be limited to
50 feet, unless an amended application is reviewed by the CDB;
3. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to issuance of
building permits;
4. That a setback reduction for the hot tub along the seawall be secured through application to
the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance
of building permits;
5. That all signage comply with Code; and
6. That the Gorgonian (marine life) colony be relocated if it is determined by the City that it will
be impacted by the proposed dock location, and a letter from the ecological consultant of
record shall be submitted to the City confirming the relocation or lack of impact, prior to
issuance of building permit.
Prepared by: Mark T. Parry, Planner LrK~t ~-)f1
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\FLEX\Pending casesReviewed & Pending\Dolphin Point 211 Dolphin Point Condominiums 11-
Approved\Dolphin Point 211 STAFF REPORT. doc
Page 13
.
.
BADGER PROPERTIES, LLP
Roger A. Larson, President
#5 Island Park Place, Unit 308
Dunedin, Florida 34698
727-461-1818
June 18, 2002
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
City of Clearwater
Planning Director
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Development Order re: Case FL 01-06-23 at 211 Dolphin Point;
Request for extension for Application of Building Permit
Dear Ms. Tarapani:
Badger Properties LLP obtained a Development Order from the City of
Clearwater pursuant to section 4-2060.6 of the Community Development Code
on August 21,2001.
Pursuant to section 4-407 an application for a building permit shall be
made within one year of the flexible development approval date, which is August
21,2002.
In light of the events of September 11,2001 it was my determination not to
proceed with the construction of the units until a more favorable marketplace and
environment was available for the construction, marketing and sale of the eleven
(11) condominium units.
Since the approval of the development order, however, I can advise you
that I have proceeded with my permits to obtain docks both through local and
federal authorities and those permits should be available shortly.
I have employed the general contractor and instructed the architect to
commence final drawings for the application of permits.
All soil tests,
for each of the units
FILE COpy
~ ot -fXo-&)
.....
.
.
I am instituting an appraisal and feasibility study to establish the
marketable sales price of the units and have drafted and will be filing within the
next forty-five (45) days the application to the Department of Business
Regulation, Division of Land Sales and Condominiums for the approval of the
condominium documentation. I then intend to present the units for sale on the
marketplace. In light of the economy, I have taken the approach that until I have
firm sales of at lease seven (7) of the eleven (11) units, I will not break ground.
Notwithstanding that philosophy I will be proceeding in a diligent fashion to
complete final working drawings so that permits can be applied for timely within
the extension period.
I respectfully request that the City of Clearwater grant me a one-year
extension for the making of application for permits.
Please place this request on the next regular agenda for approval.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
C IT Y
OF
CL.RWATER
October 19, 2001
Pergolizzi - Page 2
.
LONG RANCE PIA.'lNING
DEVFLOPMENTREVlEW
HOUSING DIVISION
NflGHBORHoon SERVICES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST Omu Box 4748, CI.EARWA1EH, FLORID,,33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUilDING, 100 SmITH MYRTLE AVENUE, CI.EARWATER, FI.ORrDA 33756
TELEPIlONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562.4576
October 19, 200 1
Conditions of approval:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density be limited to 11 dwellings units and the height of the building be
limited to 50 feet. unless an amended application is reviewed by the CDB;
3. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to
issuance of building permits;
4. That a setback reduction for the hot tub along the seawall be secured through
application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as
necessary, prior to issuance of building permits;
5. That all signage comply with Code; and
6. That the Gorgonian (marine life) colony be relocated if it is detennined that it will be
impacted by the proposed dock location, and <:. letter from the ecological consultant of
record shall be submitted to the City confirming the relocation or lack of impact, prior
to issuance of building permit.
Mr. Robert C. PergoIizzi, AICP
Florida Design Consultants, Inc
2639 McCormick Drive
Clearwater, Florida 33759
FILE
RE: Development Order regarding case F' /11 0'" ')j:. !lot 71 1 Dolohin Point
. Dear Mr. Pergohzzi:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On October 16, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to amend an approved site plan
with an increase in density from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling units, increase the
height of the proposed building from 44.5 feet to 50 feet and reduce the side (east)
setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet for a multi~use dock, as part of Residential Infill Project
under the provisions of Section 2-404 and 3-601. The proposal includes a five-story,
eleven~unit condominium with an accessory, 500 square foot, multi-use dock. Based on
the application and the staff recommendation, the Community Development Board
(CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (October 16, 2002). All required certificates of
occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
Bases for aDoroval:
L The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project
criteria under the provisions of Section 2-404.
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section
3-913.
3. The proposal complies with Flexible Development criteria for multi-use docks under
the provisions of Section 3-601.
4. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the
necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In
order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please
bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible
Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the
subject of the approval within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an
application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final
determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 30,
2001.
BHlANJ_ AIIK1SI', MAYOH.C0,\1M1SSI()NI'H
Ell H.wl', VIU: MAYOH.Co.\I.\lISSIONt'H WtttTNI'Y GIl\\'. Cm\.\\lSS10;\FH
Hun H.\.\\ttlON. CIJ.\tMISSIOKFH * BIII.rO,sSO,'i. CO\L\llSSIO;<I'H
"'E1.lliA!. EMI'U)YMH.'T "'>II) AHtHMAt"IVE AcnoN l:.~lrLO\.IOI('
October 19, 200 I
Pergolizzi - Page 3
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 562-4558.
fir
~
Gerald Figurski, Chairman
Community Development Board
CC: Houle Industries
Mr. Roger Larson
S:\Platlnins O"parlm..lI^C D B\FluVmlorrlvt' (If Flni.~ht'd Applifaliml.l\DoIphin Poinr 21 I Dolphi" Palnr Cmtdt""i"illltl.~ 11 .
Appmm:l\DIJlpJz;" pflinr 21 I DEVELOPMENT ORDER.dlN"
~
.
.
f
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
October 16, 2001, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!. Those
cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff. neil!hborinl! property owners. etc. will be placed on a
consent al!enda and approved by a sinlde vote at the bel!innine of the meetine.
1. Houle Industries. Inc. I Badl!er Properties are requesting a flexible development application to amend an
approved site plan with an increase in density from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling units, increase the height of
the proposed building from 44.5 feet to 50 feet, and reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 1.5 feet for a
proposed dock multi-use dock as part of Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-404 and 3-601
of the Community Development Code (Proposed Use: An II-unit condominium building with 500 square foot multi-
use dock) at 211 Dolphin Point, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 5-A, Lots 10 & 11. FL 01-08-26
2. Norman L. Kirkland. Jr. TRE I Georl!e Gross. TRE I Relieious Community Services. Food Pantry are
requesting a flexible development application to permit a social/public service agency within the Commercial
District with a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 2-704 of the Community
Development Code (Proposal: The proposal includes locating the Religious Community Services Food Pantry within
an existing one-story, 12,000 square foot metal building) at 700 Druid Rd., Magnolia Park, Block 26, Lots 1,2,9
& 10. FL 01-08-27
3. Greenwood Apartment Company I Greenwood Apartments. L.C. I Roxanne Amoroso are requesting a
flexible development application to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 288 to 127 spaces (85 spaces
on-site and 42 spaces on-street) and permit a six-foot high, wrought-iron fence with masonry columns within the
front setbacks along Palmetto Street (south), Palm Bluff Street (north), North Greenwood Avenue (west) and West
Avenue (east), as part of a Residential Infill Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions
of Section 2-404 of the Community Development Code (Proposed Use: The renovation of an existing 200-unit multi-
family development complex with 192 attached dwelling units) at 1001 N. Greenwood Ave., Sec. 10-29-15, M&B
24.02. FL 01-08-28
4. John A. & Clemontine M. Miller I Greenwood Apartments. L.C. I Roxanne Amoroso are requesting a
flexible development application to reduce the required front setbacks along Palmetto Avenue (south) from 25 feet to
15 to building, along West Avenue (west) from 25 feet to 15 feet to pavement, along Madison (east) from 25 feet to
15 feet to building, reduce the side setback (north) from 20 feet to 10 feet to building, and reduce the required
number of parking spaces from 11 to six spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 2-1004 of the Community Development Code
(Proposed Use: A 3,500 square foot office with club house, laundry and educational facilities, in association with the
adjacent multi-family complex (North Greenwood Apartments) to the west) at 1000 N. Madison or 1003 West Ave.
Springfield Sub., Blk B, part of Lot 13 and Lot 14. FL 01-09-29
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
~
.
.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning
Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON
WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODA TION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPA TE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST
AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 09/29/01
..
.
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S MYRTLE AVE.
POBOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748
OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567
FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576
.
TO:
Roger Larson
FAX#:
441.8617
FROM:
Mark T. Parry. Planning and Development Services. City of Clearwater
DATE:
Friday. September 14. 2001
MESSAGE:
Re: 211 Dolphin Point
~~~
Roger,
The following page contains the comments from this week's DRC meeting.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558.
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Two (2)
...
.
.
11:30 p.m.
Case: FL 01-08-26 - 211 Dolphin Point
Owner/Applicant: Houle Industries, Inc.
Representative: Mr. Robert Pergolizzi/ Florida Design Consultants.
Location: 0.37 acres located on the south side of Dolphin Point, approximately 550 feet west of
Larboard Way.
Atlas Page: 26713
Request: Flexible Development to amend an approved site plan with an increase in density from
nine dwelling units to 11 dwellin units to increase the hei ht of the ro osed buildin from 44.5
feet to 50 feet,
and reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to
dock as part of Residential Infill Project.
Proposed Use: An 11-unit condominium building with multi-use dock.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
Attendees included: Roger Larson, Robert Pergolizzi, Steve Spencer, Tom Horne, Tom Cuba, Terry Finch of
Engineering Department
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. This is a new case with a new number from the approved plan that went to the COB
2. Proposed grades in parking lot and swales must be shown on plans;
3. Soil borings need to be provided; they have been submitted at this drc meeting;
4. Drawdown calc's need to be provided;
5. Outfall structures are needed for water quality treatment;
6. Building must be sprinkled; roger agrees it will be sprinkled
7. Fire Department connection at least 15 ft. from bldg. and within 40 ft of a fire hydrant;
8. Knox lockbox required if gated entry as per Pinellas County Ordinance;
9. Open Space, Recreation Land Recreation Facilities impact fees will need to be addressed prior to
issuance of building permits;
10. Hot tub shown in 18' seawall setback;
11. Handicap space per City Standards;
12. TIF @ $953/unit;
13. Per terry finch: cannot determine if the length of the dock is with 25% of the width of the waterway;
the length of each dock appears to be within 50% of the width of the property; need water depths,
need benthics/submerged aquatic vegetation survey performed by a qualified biologist - roger says he
submitted this to terry finch
14. Regarding the dumpster: the plan needs to be revised to state that there is a chute room and address
who the solid waste will be made available to the city (this is not a dumpster with enclosure) this chute
has a roof on it; the dumpster within the room needs to be pulled out by someone on the site for the
city; the city is not responsible for taking the dumpster out of the chute room - FIX THIS PRIOR TO
GOING TO COB - Roger Larson said they will take off the dumpster enclosure detail and note 15
from the plan; the doors will be relocated to the east side of the of the chute
15. The dock surface is 500 feet exactly - this will be put on the site plan; report was sent to terry finch;
addressed 3a through 3g of the code; roger says he complies with the dimensional stuff including h
through? tie poles will be one foot inside the property line
16. Roger will get us a better detailed plan with respect to the docks with dimensions
17. Ferry Finch to be at the COB meeting regarding the docks
18. 15 sets of all revised site plans and applications to be submitted by Monday, September 17,2001 (we
may get the dock information later than that) this case will be forwarded to theCDB for review at its
October 16,2001 meeting
19. we will send a copy of this to Roger Larson - fax number 441-8617
DRC agenda - September /3, 200/ - Page 5
CITY OF CLEARWATER
August 31, 200 I
Pergolizzi - Page 2
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OfFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FWRlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
Conditions of approval:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density be limited to nine dwellings units and the height of the building be
limited to 44.5 feet, unless an amended application is reviewed by the CDB;
3. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to
issuance of building permits;
4. That a setback reduction for the hot tub along the seawall be secured through
application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as
necessary, prior to issuance of building permits; and
5. That all signage comply with Code.
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
HOUSING DNISION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVlCES
August 31, 200 I
Mr. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AlCP
Florida Design Consultants, Inc
2639 McCormick Drive
Clearwater, Florida 33759
~I!\lle
~i~".., It;
RE: Development Order regarding case FL 01-06-23 &t 21 LQplphin Point
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (August 21, 2002) and all required certificates of
occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
Dear Mr. Pergolizzi:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On August 21, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your application to reduce the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 125
feet, reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to four feet to pavement, reduce the rear
(south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet to pavement and to increase the height from 30
feet to 50 feet as part of a Residential Infill Project. The proposal includes a four-story,
nine-unit, 33,120 square foot condominium building. Based on the application and the
staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the
application with the following bases and conditions:
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the
necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In
order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please
bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
Bases for approval:
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible
Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which
subject of the approval within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filin
application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending th
determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on Septem
2001.
1. The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project
criteria.
2. The plan complies with general applicability criteria.
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 562-
~~
~erald Figurski, Chairman
Community Development Board
13ltIAN.J. AlJI\(;YJ', MAYDa-COMMISSIONER
ED H/\H'I, VICE MAYOH-CO.\IMISSIOf\;J:I{ WHITNEY GII:\\". (O.\I.\lISSIOr\EH
Hon H/\_\llITON, CO.\IML'iSIONEH * lllJ.J.JOl\S()t\', CO.\I,\1JSS1()~EI{
"EQlillL EMI'1.0n..IE."T A.\!D AFFII\MATIVE ACTION EMPl.m1m"
S:IP/anning Department\C D BIFLEXI/nnacfiye or Finished App/icationsIDo/phin Point 211 Dolphin Poinl Condominiums.
ApprovedlDo/phin Point 2/1 DEYELOPMENT ORDER. doc
.
.
.
.
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
August 21. 2001
FL 01-06-23
E2
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Houle Industries, Inc.
LOCATION:
211 - 217 Dolphin Point
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot width
from 150 feet to 125 feet, reduce the front (north) setback along
Dolphin Point from 25 feet to four feet, reduce the rear (south)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet and to increase the height from 30
feet to 50 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
Architectural plans submitted by Spencer and Associates
Architecture, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.37 acres; 16,100 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
140 feet of width by 125 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Vacant
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
RH, Residential High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Attached dwellings
East: Attached dwellings
South: Clearwater Bay
Page 1
. .
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: High-density residential and assorted manna uses dominate the
immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The rectangular site is 0.37 acres located on the south side of Dolphin Point, approximately 550
feet west of Larboard Way. The site consists of two lots, Lots 10 and 11, that have been
combined through a Unity of Title. Both lots are currently vacant. The site is located within a
redeveloping, residential portion of the City located directly along Clearwater Bay in the Island
Estates neighborhood. The area is defined by several, comparably scaled condominium
developments located on similarly sized lots.
The proposal includes the development of nine attached dwellings within one, four-story
building. Due to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements, the first floor
will be used for parking only. The proposed building will be located 16 feet from any adjacent
structure. All parking will be located under the building on the ground floor including 17 spaces
exceeding Code requirements. The ground floor parking will not be visible from adjacent
properties. Access to the site is proposed via a single curb cut along Dolphin Point.
The contemporary, Mediterranean architecture of the building will include neutral-color stucco, a
standing seam, metal roof, and a significant number of windows and balconies on the north and
south elevations. The proposed landscaping will exceed the intent of Code and will include
flowering trees and shrubs providing interest throughout the year. All sight triangles will be
honored providing unblocked views to the water from adjacent sites as required by Code. All
proposed signage will need to meet current Code requirements. Amenities include a hot tub to
the rear of the building. If the hot tub is designed to be below grade and located within 18 feet of
the seawall, a variance will be required through the City's Board of Adjustment and Appeal for
Building and Flood, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The applicant seeks to reduce the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 125 feet, reduce the front
(north) setback from 25 feet to four feet (to pavement), reduce the rear (south) setback from 15
feet to zero feet and to increase the height of the proposed building from 30 feet to 50 feet.
Although the elevations indicate a 44.S-foot high building, the applicant is requesting 50 feet in
order to have the flexibility of adding another floor to the building with additional dwelling units.
The zoning and land use of the site limit the density to 11 dwelling units.
The lot exceeds the minimum lot area requirement of 15,000 square feet but does not meet Code
requirements for lot width. The lots on either side of the subject site have been developed and
there are no opportunities to expand the site or increase the lot width. The surrounding
properties have been developed with attached dwellings with setbacks similar to those proposed
with this application. The existing width of the lot creates a difficulty in locating a reasonably
sized building without a reduction in the setbacks as requested.
Page 2
. .
.
.
The plan includes a retention pond located at the northwest comer of the site. The application,
however, did not include percolation tests that show that the pond will recover within 24 hours of
a storm event. This information must be provided to satisfy stormwater management criteria,
prior to the issuance of any permits. As provided in Section 4-406 of the Code, should
addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one
approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board
for review. The plan includes a dumpster with chute at the northwest side of the building. It
must be designed to meet Solid Waste Department requirements.
This application includes a multi-use dock request that will be forwarded to the CDB at a future
date. Details regarding that part of the application are still being finalized.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding code violations associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD
IN THE MHDR, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units Vacant 9 uni ts Yes
per acres (11
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.85 Vacant 0.63 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO
Page 3
.
.
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PROJECTS IN THE MHDR, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 0.37 acres; 0.37 acres; Yes
16,100 square 16,1 00 square
feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 125 feet 125 feet Yes
HEIGHT 30 feet Vacant 50 feet Yes*
FRONT YARD 10 ~ 25 feet Vacant 4 feet Yes*
SETBACK
SIDE YARD o ~ 10 feet Vacant East: 10 feet Yes
SETBACK West: 10 feet
REAR YARD 0-15 feet Vacant Zero feet Yes
SETBACK
PARKING 1 space per Vacant 17 spaces Yes
SPACES dwelling unit (9
spaces)
* The development standards for Residential Infill Projects are guidelines and may be varied
based on the criteria specified in Section 2-404(F).
B. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ATTACHED DWELLINGS IN THE MHDR,
MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development
standards;
The vacant parcel is nonconforming for attached dwellings in terms of lot width. It is,
however, similar in size to surrounding lots that contain attached dwellings. The width
of the lot further restricts the placement and the reasonable size of an attached dwelling
building. The proposal includes constructing a nine-unit condominium 50 feet in
height. The proposed setbacks and height are similar the surrounding condominiums
and will compliment the neighborhood.
Page 4
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposed variations from Code are consistent with the character of the
neighborhood. The proposed complex will likely enhance property values in the area.
The current assessed valuation of the site is $243,000. With the redevelopment
proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at $3,000,000. This increase in property
value is expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwelling use. The site is currently zoned
MHDR District, and the use is permitted within that classification.
4. The uses within the residential in fill project are compatible with adjacent land
uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise. The proposed condominium complex is specifically geared to take
advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Bay. This location provides a
unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that is currently
underutilized.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential in fill
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development;
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The architecture and amenities will enhance the area. The existing
structures in the area are similar in terms of size and scale to the proposal.
6. The design of the proposed residential in fill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of Clearwater
Beach and Downtown Clearwater. The proposed development will play an important
role in the continuing revitalization of both the beach and Downtown Clearwater. The
City will benefit by having an attractive building complex located in a redeveloping
area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape enhancements, as revised,
will significantly improve the site.
Page 5
.
.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking,
access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community
character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposal includes setbacks that are consistent with other attached dwellings in the
neighborhood. The neighborhood consists of well-maintained, attached dwellings. The
proposal is consistent with the neighborhood and maintains a consistent streetscape.
While surrounding buildings have been well maintained, they appear dated. The
proposed development includes an attractive building that will raise the standards in the
area and should encourage like development. The proposed development will
aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater as a whole.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with high quality mid-rise attached dwellings on similarly sized
lots. This proposal includes high-end condominiums with amenities. It will continue a
positive redevelopment pattern for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned Medium High Density Residential District and the proposed
development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The design of the site
will include an attractive building with preserved sight views to the water.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed nine-unit, development will have one ingress/egress point of access along
Dolphin Point. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected
intersections or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
Page 6
.
.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate
vicinity with regard to height and setbacks especially given the FEMA required first floor
elevation. Other surrounding sites have been developed with multi-story dwellings with
similar setbacks.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of a single building with a minimum of a 16- foot
view corridor between the nearest structures to the east or west. All required view
triangles will be provided. Parking in excess of Code requirements will be provided.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 12, 2001. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to reduce the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 125 feet, reduce the
front (north) setback along Dolphin Point from 25 feet to four feet, reduce the rear (south)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet and to increase the height from 30 feet to 50 feet as part of a
Residential Infill Project, for the site at 211-217 Dolphin Point, with the following bases and
conditions:
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project criteria.
2. The plan complies with general applicability criteria.
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density be limited to nine dwellings units and the height of the building be limited to
50 feet, unless an amended application is reviewed by the CDB;
3. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to issuance of
building permits;
4. That a setback reduction for the hot tub along the seawall be secured through application to
the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance
of building permits; and
5. That all signage comply with Code.
)
,'J;
Prepared by: Mark T. Parry, Planner / 1 .
Page 7
.
.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending ApplicationslDolphin Point 2// Dolphin Point CondominiumslDolphin Point 2// STAFF
REPORTdoc
Page 8
,
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
Mr. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP
Florida Design Consultants, Inc
2639 McCormick Drive
Clearwater, Florida33759
RE: Complete Application for Flexible Development approval (FL EIL.,E
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FWRIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
August 23, 2001
Dear Mr. Pergolizzi:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to amend an approved site plan with an
increase in density from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling units to increase the height
from 44.5 feet to 50 feet and reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 1.5 feet for a
proposed dock as part of Residential Infill Project at 211 Dolphin Point. After a
preliminary review of the submitted items, Staff has determined that the application is
complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and
assigned the case number: FL 01-08-26.
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on
September 13, 2001 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the
second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater.
Please call Sandy Harriger at 562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date
for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed.
You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may
have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558.
Sincerely yours,
~-"='".'~_.~-'~.'-""'-'-""-'..'. ".--~/
, ...-'
~
MarkT.Parry
Planner
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next DRCIDolphin Point 211 Dolphin Point Condominiums 11-
ApprovedlDolphin Point 211 Complete. doc
BIlIAN J AlINGST, MAYOIl-CO.\lMISSIONER
ED HAIlT, VICE MAYOR-CO~l~llSSIONEIl WHITNEY GIlAY. Cml~llSSIO\EK
HOlT HA\III.TON, COMMISSIONEH * BiLl. JONSON, CmnllsSIONEK
"EQUAL EMPLOYME0:T A0:0 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
-
1<obert- Pe~50\ -\2-2.1 tTIcP
Flor; ~ l:::eS'igh Gf1SU IA-a.v\.~....1/i.c.
2Co-~9 mCCc9rrY\;' c.k Dr.
CJ Lo.-v-ub.Je r) f=-L "33 75~
HDole:. ~dtJs+r-ies . :I/lc.
./
63 \ Commc:::rc..e~r.
La_n30) ~L "S"3.70,
FL TNT IMP FUND TRE
c;o KING, CHARLES A
347 FOREST LAKE RD
LA(.\JRENCEVILLE G(~
30045 6005
CUTTER COVE CONDO
HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC
600 BYPASS DR
CLEAR(.\.IATER FL
33764 5078
HOLLINS, DAVID M
HOLLINS" KEr~RI A
20 LAKERIDGE S
ORCHARD PAm<. NY
14127 33"10
SHULER, ROBERT 0 JR
SHULER" MARTHA J
320 ISLAND WAY UNIT 104
CLEARI;JATER FL
33767 2180
COTTINGHAM, CAROLE
320 ISLAND WAY ~ 106
CLEP1RWA TER FL
33767 2180
KINGSCOURT INV LTD
2 LE MERCHANT ST
ST PETEr~ PORT
GUERNSEY GYI 2JJ
CHANNEL ISLAND
BINDER" IRENE G TRE
BINDER, RALPH H TRE
320 ISLAND WAY ~ 204
CLE~'iRWATER FL
33767 21.80
DOLPHIN POINT INC
276 BAYSIDE DR
CLEAR'IJATER FL
~5376 7
ASSAAD, l'IAB I L
~'iSSP1AD , SAM I A
222 DOLPHIN PT
CLE~'iR\IJATEr~ F'L
33767 2107
f<'F~~'TZ, CHARLES J
KR(~ T Z, N~~A
246 DOLPHIN PTIN PT
CLEARW~HER FL
337f.:,7
--
SEp 2 6 2001
'--....-..-
F L 0 1- 0 <? - Uo CDB 10.. (to -0 l
I~G ~~ R", \:>r)
HIGH & DRY MARINA INC
202 IIJ I ND\oIJARD PSE
CLE~'iRW(nER FL
33767
SZENTAL, I1ARY
320 ISLAND WAY ~ 101
CLE?IRI,"ATER FL
~53767
VODDE, LEO B
1019 ELM WOOD AVE
FT WP1YNE IN
46805 4209
CASALE, PETER M
C~'iSALE, ROSE
37 ASHFORD DR
BOHEMIA NY
11716 3960
LEA, NATHANIEL WIll
320 ISLAND WAY ~ 201
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2180
DOBSON, REGINALD J
DOBSON, LEE
313 WALDEGRAVE RD
TWKKENHAM, LONDON TW1 4S
GREf.H BRITAIN
L.OREN, LEWIS I
LOREN" NANCY J
1780 STEAMBURG RD
HILLSD~'iLE MI
49242 2075
BADGER PROPERTIES
911 CHESTNUT ST
CL.EAR(.\!?HER FL.
~53756
/'
M J H PROPERTIES INC
2035 PHILIPPE PKWY
SAFETY HARBOR FL.
34695 2200
-
e
KLOCZKOWSKI. WITOLD W
KLOCZKOWSKI. REINA B
320 ISLAND WAY W 2-206
CLEARWATER FL
3376"1 2179
BARR. THOt1AS J
9 RUTGERS DR
DEL RAN NJ
08075 1609
JESS. JOHN C
HERSONDALE FARM
EGERTON FORSTA
ASHFORD KENT TN2"190B
GREAT BRITfUN
KROL. BRUCE
KROL. PATRICIA
25253 BROOKFIELD LN
CHANNt~HON I L
604.10 8/46
liAR I ON. PAMEU..! A
320 ISLAND WAY # 210
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2180
RAFFAELE. ROBERT J
RAFFAELE. DEANNA L
320 ISLAND WAY W 211
CLEf~R'^,ATER FL
33767 2180
OLOFSSON. PER OLOF
1<,ATTFOTSVAGEN 12
NORRKOPING 603 66
SWEDEN
BURNETT. CHARLES
BURNETT. GERALDINE
320 ISLAND WAY W 5-509
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2179
FITZPATRICK. THOMAS L
FITZPATRICK. JUNE H
3523 EASTERN AVE
DAVENPORT IA
5280"1 2025
DOLPHIN APT CONDO
r-~SSOCIATION
2.10 DOLPHIN PT
CLEAI;:WATER FL
3376/ 2106
BAZLER. KA'{
PO BOX 3623
CLEf~R~\I(.'JTEF~ FL
CURRY. JOHN 1"1
2.10 DOLPHIN POINT RD I B
CL_E:ARWr-YfER FL
33767 2,106
~5:5.7 ~:) ~1 ~3c)23
ATKINSON. LOUISE B
210 DOLPHIN PT W C
CLEAm"IATER FL
~)3767 2.106
MAC KAY. BRIAN R
t'i(.~C 1<,f~Y. CATHI B
210 DOLPHIN PT I 0
CLEARWt~TER FL
33767 2106
FRISICANO. t'iARK
4"129 44TH ST
SUNNYSIDE NY
.11377
LANG. ROBERT G
LANG. t1ARGARET M
25 BELLEVUE CRESCENT
AYR KA72DP
SCOTLAND
GATES. JEAN H TRE
PO BOX 38'~;;o5
CLEAm-IATER FL
3376"1 8895
WATERS. ROBIN E
PO BOX 3673
CLEARWATER FL
:33"167 8673
SANTORO. VINCENT A
f~BRU.zZO. JO ANN
1324 HEMPSTEAD TPKE
EUi0NT NY
11003 1.127
NOLAN. LICIA
PO BOX 5488
CLEf.'JRWATER FL
33"158 5488
LAI'''GE. HARVEY
U~NGE. I<'ATHI
812 E MAIN
(~TTICf~ IN
47918 1930
LEVIN. HARVEY F
4225 E MEXICO AVE I 30"1
DENVER CO
80222 4.122
POND. RONALD G
3.1 ISLAND WAY I 1408
CLEARWATER FL
33767
WRIGHT, THOMAS H TRE
255 DOLPHIN PT PH 10
CLEAR'^,A TER FL
3~$"l67 2165
e
e
DONDERO, JOSEPH
DONDERO. GLORIA
5378 GEE BROOK RD
CINCINNATUS NY
13040 2110
FERRY. HUGH F
255 DOLPHIN PT PH 12
CLEARWATEF~ FL
3~3767 2165
SETOLA, MICHAEL J
SETOLA. ROBIN
255 DOLPHIN PT PH 13
CLEARI;.JATER FL
33767 2.165
RANNO. CHARLES G
255 DOLPHIN PT I 201
CLE~~Rl,.IJATER FL
3~5767 2111
KERVIN. JOHN E
MARCHOCKI. SANDRA L
6 KRISTIN CT
HYDE Pf~RK t'1A
02136 1103
BUCLOUS. SAMUEL L
BUCLOUS. DAISY 0
255 DOLPHIN PT I 203
CLEARWATER FL.
33767 2.111.
ROBBIE. IAN
5 NECHTM" PL
LETHAM ANGUS DD 82 LA
SCOTU-)ND
PACCHIA. ALBERT L
PACCHIA, L.OL.A
367 CASTEL.FIELD AVE
TORONTO ON M5N 1L4
CANADA
RUVEL.AS. CONSTANTINE
F~UVEUiS. GEOFWI(~
307 PARK PI.. AVE
BRf~DLE'y' BCH N.J
07720 1430
RANNO. CHARLES G
255 DOLPHIN POINT RD I 201
CLEARWATER FL
3:3'761 2111
WOLFF, GEOFWE F
li-JOLFF. SONDRA
255 DOL.PHIN PT I 208
CLEARWf~TER FL.
33761 2111
THORNTON. TRENT
THORNTON. JANA
255 DOLPHIN PT I 209
CLEf~RWATER FL
33167
LENDENMANN. MARY
231, 9.1ST ST I 2
BROOKLYN NY
11209 57.1.1
FRAKES, DEBORAH L
711 t1ILL \/ALLEY
TAYLOR MILL KY
410.15 228.1
FOSTER MICHAEL. [)
255 DOLPHIN POINTE I 212
CLEARWATEF~ FL
33161 21~L1
';.JIRSING. MICHAEL
WIRSING" ROBIN
255 DOLPHIN POINT I 213
CLEARWATER FL
33167 2111
GREEN. ';.JILLTAM C
STERL I NG CT :3
255 DOLPHIN PT I 301
CLEf~RI""f~TER FL
~537 6 7 21.13
WRIGHT, HERBERT S
225 DOLPHIN PT # 302
CLEARl,.IJATER FL
3~376 7 2104
YARBROUGH. ANDREW M
255 DOLPHIN POINT I 303
CLEARWATER FL
~53'7 6 7 2113
BIERMAN. EDWARD B JR
411 HIGHLAND AVE
EAST SYRACUSE NY
1~505 7 2153
BUDDE, ROGER H
BUDDE, JOYCE A
1004 GOODRICH AVE
ST PAUL t1N
~)5105 3132
BOOKOUT, GARY E
BOOKOUT. CAROLYN L
255 DOLPHIN PT I 306
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2113
DURSHORDWE. WIL.LIAM
255 DOLPHIN POINT RD # 307
CLEARWATEF~ FL
~3~~767 217.1
PEARSON. JOHN T
COONEY. WILLIAM J
255 DOLPHIN PT I 308
CLEARWATER FL
33767 21.14
e
e
',HGLE, FF~ANK T
WIGLE, JUt',IE I
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 309
CLEARW~~TER FL
33767 2114
SALLUSTIO, JOSEPH FAMILY TR
9844 PEBBLE BEACH LN
LITTLETON CO
80124 3107
MA~~NINO, GIVLIO
t1ANN I NO, ROSA
775 BURLINGTON RD
PITTSGROVE NJ
08318 3709
BARRETT, WILLIAM T
BARRETT, SHEILA M
11 IDLEWILD ST ~ 201
CLE~~RWATER FL
:;:;3767 1518
ROBOV I CS, t'1(-)RY
255 DOLPHIN PT W 313
CLEARWATEr~ FL
:33767 21.14
ANASTOS" LULU
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 3.14
CLEAR'~JATER FL
33767 2.114
AGGELETOS, JOHN
(~GGEl_ETOS" VICKI
6507 MERIWETHER LN
~3PRINGFIELD VA
22150 13.19
SAMARAS, THEODOROS
S~~MARAS, T r-IN?~
8759 52ND r-WE
ELMHURST NY
11.373 3937
HOSE, ERNEST B JR
HOSE" LILLY
255 DOLPHIN POINT RD W 403
CLE(.)RWATE/;;: FL
33767 217.1
MPIRK" SUSAN
2270 SPRINGFLOWER DR
CLEARlt-JATER FL.
33763 2233
HAGEMAN" ARTHUR F
255 DOL.PHIN POINT RD ~ 405
CL.E(-)RWATER FL
33767 2.17.1
Cr-waER ,. t10RR:r S (1.J
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 406
CL.EARWATER FL.
33767
GERVrl IS" BLANCHE
930 W MARGATE TERR
CHICAGO IL
60640 38.10
MANEY" CHARL.ES S TRE
MANEY. CLAIRE L. TRE
3686 E SADDLE BACK DR
CANANDAIGUA NY
.14424 2723
PAPPAS" BARBARA
PAPPAS" NICHOLAS
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 409
CLEARW?~ TER FL
~;376l 2.11.5
TRAIFOROS" PETER
TRAIFOROS" ANGELA
1.1363 HUNTINGTON RD
KLEINBURG ON LOJ ~CO
CANADA
RUSSELL" HAZEL C
736 ISLAND WAY ~ 103
CLEARWATER FL
3~5l6 7 181l
HAZZARD" WILLIAM J
HAZZARD" MICHELLE M
W 902-9099 RIVERSIDE OR E
WINDSOR ON N85 4R1
CANADA
JACKSON, VIRGINIA M
255 DOLPHIN POINT I 413
CLE(-)RltJ(HER FL
33767
Pr-)NIJAN" JOSEPH
2840 N 73RD PL
KANSr-iS CITY ~\S
66109 1719
ZETTERBERG" JEAN M
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 502
CLEARlt-JATER FL
33767 2.11.6
ZETTERBERG" JEAN M
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 502
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2.116
B~~VEF1OV, EDWARD
2.17 ROBIN RD
j'1ILLVILLE NJ
08332 5541
DONNELLY, JEAN G
30 BLANTYRE, GARDENS BLACKWOO
CUMBERNAULD Q68 9NJ SCOT
UNITED KINGDOM
e
e
DILLON, CHARLES J JR
DILLON, KATHLEEN A
770 ISLAND WAY WN105
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1843
KEU. Y, ROBERT F
KELL Y, Mf~RY C
255 DOLPHIN POINT RD ~ 506
CLEAR\"'ATER FL
33767 21-71
CHEUVRONT, DEBORAH S
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 507
CLEAR~IA TER FL
33767 2116
TOMARAS, GEORGE R
TOMARAS, CHRISTINE G
15241 S HEATHER CT
ORLAND PARK IL
60462 4203
LE\lJIS, GUS .J
LE\lHS, CAROL J
332 CRESCENT GARDENS DR
PITTSBURGH PA
15235 3543
WILLIAMS, DAVID E
WILLIAMS, MARGARET J
5246 KARRINGTON DR
GIBSONIA PA
15044 6023
11C COY" PAUL E
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 511
CLEARII>JATER FL
:">;3767 2.117
BIRT, LOUISE
465.1 STATE LINE
KANSAS CITY ~10
64112 LL25
ST MARTIN, DAVID J
ST MARTIN, KAREN P
54 COLLEEN ST
D(..)NIELSON CT
06239 3300
QUINTELA, DOLORES
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 514
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2117
PERGANTAS, LOUKAS
PERGANTt.~S, NIKI
2099 POST RD
NORTHBROOK IL
60062 6207
DOGAN, ROBERT
DOGAN, NANCY S
25125 W GRASS LAKE RD
ANTIOCH IL
60002 9769
ALT, ARTHUR J
ALT, DIANE E
7414 1ST CIRCLE DR
BROOKSVILLE FL
34613 7316
MILLER, RENEE M TRE
154 S WOODWARD AVE STE 205
BIRMINGHAM MI
48009 6104
THORNTON, JENNINGS H
THORNTON, DIANE B
2360 OXBO,^' C I R
STONE MOUNTAIN GA
30087 1217
MALANDRUCO, THOMAS
6 CHERRY CIR
BLACKlplOOD NJ
080.12 4668
f3f~LAFAS" JOHN D
BAU1Ft'1S ,. DESPINA
4.174 S SYRACUSE
DENVEr~ CO
DURDA, CHRISTINA
76 ANTIOCH DR
ET08ICOKE ON M9B 5V4
CANADA
80237 2168
VOLL.MER, JOHN F
STOCK MFG & DESIGN CO INC
761.9 LAKE POINTE
~1AINEVILL.E OH
45039 8468
SOKOL.ICH, JOHN J
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 610
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2.118
PHELPS, WEL.DON F
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 611
CL.EARWfHER FL
33767 2118
WRIGHT, VIRGINIA L TRE
255 DOLPHIN PT PH 10
CL.EAR/pJATER FL
33767 2165
MC CAFFREE, KONSTANCE
560 ~1APLE AVE
DOYLESTOII>JN PA
18901 4451
PATERAS, HARRY
24 RAMBLER RD
JAMAICA PLAIN MA
02130 ~5428
e
e
FOSS, DONALD E
FOSS, SHH<LEY
255 DOLPHIN PT I 701
CLE{.H~\"'ATER FL
33767 2166
Cf~RTNICK, LOUIS
CARTNICK, SHARYN L
1028 SHEILA DR
TOMS RIVER NJ
08753 3522
BEELER, ZELDA M
255 DOLPHIN PT I 703
CLEARWA TEF? FL
33"167 2166
ZINZIGK, FRANGULA TRE
48 W FAIRVIEW AVE
DfWTON OH
45405 ~'S3.17
STRYESKI, JANE
STRYESKI, STANLEY E
108 HILLM(~N f-WE
(~LEN ROCK N.J
07452 3018
DENTON, DIANNA L
SNOW" PAI"IELA G
255 DOLPHIN PT I 1006
CLE~~F?\t.)ATER FL
33767 2123
TOMARAS, CATHERINE
TOMARAS, KONSTANTINOS
6249 \f.! CAROL LN
PALOS HEIGHTS IL
60463 1823
JUDD, Ni4NCY B
249.1 SYC~iMor-<E 3T
ST JAt'iES CITY FL
33956 2067
MIRf-)UL T, \f..lILLIAM
MIRAULT, STEPHANIE
46 CHELSEf~ DR
SADDLE Br~OOK NJ
07663 4712
LONG, JOHN B
LONG, LAURA T
255 DOLPHIN PT I 7.10
CLEARWATER FL
33767
~~BOV I C" DU8RAVKO
f~80V I C, GORDANA
5415 N SHERIDAN RD I 3308
CHIC~~GO IL
60640 1984
VILLARREAL, JUAN 0
1317 HAVERFORD
HARLINGEN TX
"18552 3203
01 CLEMENTE, DOMENICO
01 CLEMENTE, GIULIA
2490 BELMOND AVE
BELLt-l0RE NY
11710 1208
BUHELOS, GREGORY P
BUHELOS, PENELOPE
12412 S CHEYENNE DR
PALOS HEIGHTS IL
60463 1,689
DALGLIESH, CATHERINE M
PATTERSON, PATRICIA 0
255 DOLPHIN PT I 802
CLEARWATER FL
33"16"1 2119
SHOCKLEY, NELLIE
255 DOLPHIN POINT RD I 803
CLEARWATER FL
3376"1 21"1.1
BREININGER, STEPHEN
255 DOLPHIN POINT RD I 804
CLEARWATER FL
~53767 2171
PERRY, MICHAEL J
225 DOLPHIN PT # 805
CLEf-)RWA TER FL
33767 2.104
FOWLER, RICHARD K
C/O V RICHARDSON-MARTIN
255 DOLPHIN PT APT 806
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2120
MANNING, BERNADETTE V
255 DOLPHIN PT I 807
CLEAR\t.)ATER FL
33"16"1 2120
DOUVAS, STAVROS G
DOUVAS, EVf~ S
50l. ELMWOOD AVE
WIU1ETTE lL
60091 19'73
FOSTER, THOMAS J
FOSTEr~, EMMA R
PO BOX 554
ACTON tiE
04001 0554
REMINIEC, STANLEY TRE
REMINIEC, HELEN M TRE
2035 WALNUT AVE
HANOVER PARK IL
60133 3817
CERBONE, LOUIS J
CERBONE, VILMA
255 DOLPHIN PT I 811
CLEARWATER FL
3376"1 2120
-
e
DILLON, CHARLES J
DILLON, KATHLEEN A
770 ISLAND WAY ~ Nl05
CLEARWATER FL
33767 1843
RUBIN, GILBERT S
RUBIN, ANITA
255 DOLPHIN PT If 813
CLEARWf'HER FL
33767 2121
BENOS, DINO J
BENOS, GLADYS G
151 I^,ENt-lEKER [) r;~
SAINT LOUIS tviO
63124 2031
YATES, SANDRA G
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 904
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2121
GIOTAKIS, WILLIAM
GIOTAKIS, MARIA
2401 VIRGINIA ST
PI~RI<, RIDGE IL
60068 2252
MC CASLIN, MARIAN B
255 DOLPHIN PT I 903
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2121.
BAIR, THEODORE J
3287 t1ALLARD or~
Sr--'lFETY HARBOF~ FL
34695 481.6
DEBLOIS, MONIQUE C
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 906
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2121
GILGASH, CURTIS A
GILGASH, RUTHETTPI L
255 DOLPHIN PT I 907
CLEf1R\lJATER FL
33767 2122
GALLARO, CARMELO
GALLARO, MAtviIE
1758 W 6TH ST
BROOKLYN NY
1~1223 1.3~~2
FANNING, KATHERINE R
FOSTER, Et1t1A R
111 TREBLE COVE RD
N BILLERICf1 MA
01862 2217
TROPEA, PHILIP W
TROPEA, PHYLLIS E
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 910
CLE~'1RWATER FL
33767 2122
SPANOS, JOHANNA TRE
514 MEDINA OR
ST L.OUIS MO
63122 14~-S0
I<'UZMEN, ALEX
KUZMEN, VALENTINA
213 ROBIN RD
t"iILLVILLE NJ
08332 5541.
NALE, MICHAEL
t'-./ALE, CHRISOULA
305 N DEE RD
PAr-<:K RIDGE IL
60068 281.6
POUND, FRAi'~K J
POUND, JANET J
255 DOLPHIN PT I 1001
CLEr.::jRWATER FL
33767 2123
TItJINING, (1MY L
C;O TWINING, RICHARD G TRE
255 DOLPHIN PT If 1002
CLEARWATEF~ FL
3~5767 2123
LEONARDI, VINCENT
920 RUSH SCOTTSVILLE RD
RUSH NY
1454~5 'S;;'781
DAVIS, FORD C
CARSON-DAVIS, DEBRA A
PO BOX 3694
CLEM<WA TER Fl_
33767 8694
THot-'iAS, MARY K
255 DOLPHIN PT ~ 1005
CLEARv.JATER FL
::';;3767 2123
XANTHOUDAKIS, LAURIE P
948 GEFmy AVE
LIDO BEACH NY
11561 5217
CARLSON, ROBERT J TRE
CARLSON, R J LIVING TRUST
255 DOLPHIN PT I 1007
CLEARv..IATER FL
33767 2123
TSENEKOS, WILLIAM C
TSENEKOS, MAr-UNA
847 Pf:'lRKv.JOOD (WE
PARI<. RIDGE IL
60068 2233
BASAK, RAYMOND P
255 DOLPHIN PT I 1009
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2124
e
e
KRf-1SS, ED~~~~RD N
f<,R~'-"lSS, JE~'-"l~'~ L
16100 LINDEN AVE N ~ 410
SHOREL I NE IA'A
98133 5682
DETI-lORN. GRACE E
255 DOLPHIN PT I 1011
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2.124
MIRANDO. JOSEPH M
MIRANDO, EVELYN B
1.7 CLIFF DR
BAYVILLE NY
11709 1.202
SOLECK I. FWMAN T
SOLECKI, EFTERPY
1835 W CRESCENT AVE
P~~F~K RIDGE IL
60068 3830
DOLPHIN POINT CONDO ASSN
C/O POLLICK. CHARLES J
11.73 NE CLEVELAND ST
CLEAr-<!^"ATER FL
3375.5 481.5
GRAMLEY. RICHARD W
GiRAMLEY, BETTY
205 DOLPHIN POINT I 1
CLEAm#HEI~ FL
33767 2105
POLLICK. CHARLES J
POLLICK. SANDRA L
414 BELLE ISLE AVE
BELLEAIR BEACH FL
33786 3610
COLLINS, WOODROW M
1305 WOODHAVEN LN
S~1Yf-<t-.jA GA
30082 3866
DE AZUA. r-~ENAN L
DH)Z. EDITH I
205 DOLPHIN POINT RD I 4
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2190
CLARK. ALLAN E
CLARK, JACQUELINE
.108 QUEENSLINE DR
NEPEAN ON K2H 7J5
CANADA
ES J
.(:) L
LE AVE
- CH FL
DOf'.~OVPIN, MERRY
689 ISLAND WAY
CLE~~RWATER FL
33767 1905
L.ENZ, JOHN M
LENZ, MARGARET M
205 DOLPHIN PT I 8
CLEARWATE::.R FL
~337 6"7 2.105
DOLPHIN'S LANDING
HOMEOWNERS ~'-"lSSN
372 LARBOARD Wf-W
CLEf-IRWATER FL
33767 2147
BOUFFf-1RD, PAUL E
BOUFFARD, WENDY L
342 LARBOI.',)RD WAY
CLEI:)RWPITER FL
33767 2147
CARRERA. SALVATORE M JR
CARRERA, CYNTHIA L
348 LARBOARD WAY
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2147
LEANES, JOHN t1
LEANES. SANDRA S
354 LARBOARD "'JAY
CLEARWATER FL
33767 2147
DUTCHER. JAMES A JR TRE
DUTCHER, SHERYL H TRE
360 LARBOARD WAY
CLE~'-"lRWATER FL
33767 21A7
WOHLGEMUTH. GARY G
WOHLGEMUTH. DARLENE
696 VILLAGE CLUB RD
SAG~'-"lI"jOF~E HLS OH
4406"7 2337
Gf-<AY, JEROME A
GI~AY, CYNTHI~~ t'1
11A MILL RD
LOS GATOS CA
95032 1952
CLEARWATER. CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARW~. FL
HIGH & DRY MARINA INC
202 WINDWARD PSE
CLEARIt..IATER FL
;5376"7
DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG
PO BOX 40200
ST PETERSBURG FL
3:3143 0200
010 ESE OF
PO
ST
33'7 .
PETEI~SBURG
[~ ']
;:0
o
I
-l
(fJ
o
m
m
r
m
<
)>
-l
o
Z
t',;j .~-,~,;~;,:;;,r:~:t;D :;] y:
;:0
m
)>
;:0
m
r
m
<
~
o
z
a- II 0 0 0
" . " ! I
'^ ~
t~
r
m
"T1
-l
(fJ
o
m
m
r
m
<
)>
-i
o
Z
"T1
;:0
o
Z
-i
m
r
m
<
)>
-l
o
Z
.n
i .
~
n
~ .
~
e
!
GRAY DOLPHIN CONDOMINIUMS 0
DOLPHIN POINT
c,:,::::::::::: ~
Spencer Olld Associates Architecture, Inc.
Arch=lecture Planning
1215 South "''''''lie Aile
Cle;~r'"a;er. F>::.rida 33756
727i449.ARCH 727;442..7192 f)'
ww.....sr.p.f~::~I;lf(;/',.(;')l'l" ~~~'1;peitcr.mr::h,{:ofll
.~.
.... ."
.. .... <
,.. ",!'l"
jp
~ ~ ~
! \~
,
""
~
.
.
REQUEST:
Flexible Development application to amend an approved site plan
with an increase in density from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling
units, increase the height of the proposed building from 44.5 feet to
50 feet and reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet
for a multi-use dock, as part of Residential Infill Project under the
provisions of Section 2-404 and 3-601.
UPDATE:
This case was discussed at length at the August 21, 2001 Community Development Board (CDB)
meeting. The site plan approved by the Board on that date (FL 01-08-26) included a nine unit
condominium with a reduction in the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 125 feet, reduction in
the front (north) setback from 25 feet to four feet (to pavement), reduction in the rear (south)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and an increase in the height of the proposed
building from 30 feet to 44.5 feet. A few Island Estates residents expressed some opposition.
The zoning and land use of the site limit the density to 11 dwelling units. At the meeting, the
applicant indicated a desire to amend that site plan with additional dwelling units and adding a
multi-use dock. There have been no other changes the site or landscape plans. There have been
some changes to the staff report.
The request now includes an amendment to an approved site plan with an increase in density
from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling units, an increase in the height of the proposed building
from 44.5 feet to 50 feet and reducing the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet for a 500
square foot multi-use dock, as part of Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-
404 and 3-601.
ANALYSIS:
The rectangular site is 0.37 acres located on the south side of Dolphin Point, approximately 550
feet west of Larboard Way. The site consists of two lots, Lots 10 and 11, that have been
combined through a Unity of Title. Both lots are currently vacant. The site is located within a
redeveloping, residential portion of the City located directly along Clearwater Bay in the Island
Estates neighborhood. The area is defined by several, comparably-scaled condominium
developments located on similarly-sized lots which have been developed. The developments to
the east and west include two-story buildings approximately 25 to 30 feet in height.
The proposal includes the development of 11 attached dwellings within one, five-story building.
Due to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements, the first floor will be
used for parking only. The proposed building will be located 16 feet from any adjacent structure.
Twelve parking spaces will be located under the building on the ground floor with five spaces
located within the front (north) setback along Dolphin Point. The ground floor parking will not
be visible from adjacent properties. Access to the site is proposed via a single curb cut along
Dolphin Point.
The contemporary, Mediterranean architecture of the building will include neutral-color stucco, a
standing seam, metal roof, and a significant number of windows and balconies on the north and
south elevations. The proposed landscaping will exceed the intent of Code and will include
Page 1
.,
.
.
flowering trees and shrubs providing interest throughout the year. All sight triangles will be
honored providing unblocked views to the water from adjacent sites as required by Code. All
proposed signage will need to meet current Code requirements. Amenities include a hot tub to
the rear of the building. If the hot tub is designed to be below grade and located within 18 feet of
the seawall, a variance will be required through the City's Board of Adjustment and Appeal for
Building and Flood, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
The plan includes a retention pond located at the northwest comer of the site. The application,
however, did not include percolation tests that show that the pond will recover within 24 hours of
a storm event. This information must be provided to satisfy stormwater management criteria,
prior to the issuance of any permits. As provided in Section 4-406 of the Code, should
addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one
approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board
for review. The plan includes a dumpster with chute at the northwest side of the building. It
must be designed to meet Solid Waste Department requirements.
The applicant seeks to amend an approved site plan with an increase in density and height of the
proposed building. The maximum height permitted under the minimum MHDR District
standards is 30 feet. The previous site plan approved by the Board included a four-story building
at 44.5 feet in height. The only option available to the applicant is to seek a Residential Infill
Project use approval.
The request also includes a 500 square foot multi-use dock which is governed by Section 3-601
of the Code. The dock will be a total of 42 feet in width and is located on the east portion of the
site. The east side of the dock will be 2.5 feet from the side (east) property line. Six proposed,
tie poles will be located directly on the side (east) property line. No covered or uncovered
boatlifts are proposed with this application. No other variations from Code are requested. The
applicant submitted an ecological study that includes use compatibility, navigation, water quality
and natural resource impacts. It concludes that this proposal will generate few impacts on the
marine environment.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 12, 2001. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to amend an approved site plan with an increase in density from nine
dwelling units to 11 dwelling units, increase the height of the proposed building from 44.5 feet to
50 feet and reduce the side (east) setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet for a multi-use dock, as part of
Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404 and 3-601, for the site at 215
Dolphin Point, with the following bases and conditions:
Page 2
,.
.
.
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project criteria
under the provisions of Section 2-404.
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913.
3. The proposal complies with Flexible Development criteria for multi-use docks under the
provisions of Section 3-601.
4. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density be limited to 11 dwellings units and the height of the building be limited to
50 feet, unless an amended application is reviewed by the CDB;
3. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to issuance of
building permits;
4. That a setback reduction for the hot tub along the seawall be secured through application to
the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as necessary, prior to issuance
of building permits;
5. That all signage comply with Code; and
6. That the Gorgonian (marine life) colony be relocated if it is determined by the City that it will
be impacted by the proposed dock location, and a letter from the ecological consultant of
record shall be submitted to the City confirming the relocation or lack of impact, prior to
issuance of building permit.
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Flex\Pending cases\Reviewed and Pending\Dolphin Point 211 Dolphin Point Condominiums
11\Dolphin Point 211 CDS NOTES. doc
Page 3
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E. D. ARMSTRONG III
JOHN T. BLAKELY
BRUCE H. BOKOR
GUY M. BURNS
JONATHANS.COLEMAN
MICHAEL T. CRONIN
ELlZABETHJ.DANlELS
BECKY FERRELL-ANTON
COLLEEN M. FLYNN
DENNIS G. RUPPEL*
CHARLES A. SAMARKOS
PHILIP M. SHASTEEN
JOAN M. VECCHIOLI
STEVEN H. WEINBERGER
MARION HALE
SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R. JAKES
TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.
SHARON E. KRICK
ROGER A. LARSON
JOHN R. LAWSON, JR"
LEANNE LETIZE
MICHAEL G. LITTLE
MICHAEL C. MARKHAM
STEPHANIE M. MARQUARDT
ZACHARY D. MESSA
A.R. "CHARLIE" NEAL
F. WALLACE POPE, JR.
ROBERT V. POTTER, JR.
AUDREY B. RAUCHW A Y
DARRYL R. RICHARDS
PETER A. RIVELLINI
"OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO.
June 27, 2002
Mr. Mark Parry
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FI 33756-4748
FiLE
Re: Gray Dolphin - 211 Dolphin Point Drive, Clearwater, Florida
Request for Minor Amendment to Site Plan
Dear Mark:
Enclosed are fifteen (15) copies of the first page of the site plan and of the
elevations for Gray Dolphin Condominiums.
The modification consists of the following:
1.
eliminated.
ground.
The bay windows on the east and west sides of the building have been
The width of the building has been expanded to consume additional
2. The impervious surface ratio has increased from sixty five percent (65%)
to sixty seven percent (67%) where the maximum permitted is eighty five percent
(85%).
3. The side (west, east) set backs have increased from ten feet (10') to ten
feet eight inches (10'8") where the minimum side set back is ten feet (1 a").
4. On the west side of the building the distance from building to building has
decreased from eighteen feet (18') to fifteen feet (15').
5. On the east side of the building the distance from building to building has
decreased from twenty feet (20') to eighteen feet 18').
r~:'~-'-' --.
f !f I
t t.' .';
! n/!
1 ji j' J'P-
U. 'Ii v,\' 2 1-
,"-, ~
P L......
"L!,t~1 "
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
WATER, FLORIDA 33757.1368
,LEPHONE: (727) 461-1818
'_ECOPIER (727) 462-0365
.~-;u
. , If
, TAMPA OFFICE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118
-,.,
'. '-..,
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
A TTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
Mr. Mark Parry
June 27, 2002
Page 2
No changes are required to sheets 2 and 3 of the three-page preliminary site
plan approved in October.
I request that staff review and approve the minor modifications to site plan in
accordance with the Land Development Code.
If there is any additional materials that you need or if there is a filing fee required,
kindly advise and I will see that you are accommodated.
truly,
~
A. Larson
enclosure
#270698 v1 - DolphinLtr.Parry
Din~ct all currespondence to:
Clerk, Water and Navigation
Control Authority
315 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 34616
Application #
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
COl\iMERCIAL MTJ) MULTI-USE DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION
PINELLAS COUNTY 'VATER AND NAVIGATION CONTROL AUTHORITY
Please type, or hand print in BLACK ink
1. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
A. Apphoant's Name:.. BII P<96A. rho De:{0 T( Fj
B. Mailin!dress: _ (#:: b M/'{ IJ ~JI< r&/I CE
CIty: ,Q).f ;yt(F -i)II\_ State: Ft
C. Telephone No.(s): Z:;Z 7 4L6/ I g-/g-
(L- f~
-;/ 5025'
zip:_3t/6 f g
II. AGEI\'T INFORMATION:
lA)Q+~/t~ C~ X-//lL.
B. Address Lf '30 '-{ 4J. C:r-a. rlAy 6 ;..-0
City: ~/::t-- vYl P"" St r/
_ I - ate: r~-
~(S - gOb -Ji /)
A. Name:
ZiP:~
C. Telephone N o.(s):
III. SITE INFORMATION:
A. Construction Site Address:
Ck
City:
B. Intended Use:
C. Parcel ID Number:
C1fi~t:>IVV f)I
1 /
D. Incorporated: Unincorporated: 0
E. Affected waterbody:
F. Previous Permits:
M6 "toe
G. Date applicant assumed property ownership:
H. Obstructions: (dogs, fences, etc.) No
flL;( G . ;} 7;. ';:;;' co J
rJ & month/year
1. Attach 8-1/2" X 11" vicinity map showing specific project location.
J. All other information pursuant to P.C.O. 90-19 (amended), Section 10.9, as ne7ded.
K. Does the project abut residentially zoned property? Yes 0 No ~
L. For projects requiring a public hearing, attach a copy of the complete legal description.
D4BIWD/arllENVMGW<T/ComBBfl f>llB194
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A. Nature and Size of Project:
P'l I'~J S'
)l... 3 '''2~ '5
(.v ~ Ii
'f( -e..>
Square feet:
/-{ ,) -', S
B. Variance: Yes 0 No 0
Amount in variance: Length:
Setbacks: L
, Width:
R
Other:
NOTE: It is the applicant's responsibility to clearly demonstrate that any requested variances
are consistent with the variance criteria of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control
Authority Regulations. The applicant must submit a written variance request outlining the
nature of and need for any variances. The applicant must demonstrate that a literal enforcement
of the regulations would result in an extreme hardship due to the unique nature of the project
and the applicant's property. The hardship must not be created by action(s) of the property
owner(s). The granting of the variance must be in harmony with the general intent of the
regulations and not infringe upon the property rights of others. The variance requested must
be the minimum possible to allow for the reasonable use of the applicant's property. Should
the applicant fail to demonstrate that any variance request is consistent with the cri teria outlined
in the regulations, staff cannot recommend approval of the application.
V. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION:
I, v./; l!t~ I!.e.ci<~ , a certified contractor,
state that the dock has not been constructed and that it will be built in compliance with all
requirements and standards set forth in the "Rules and Regulations" of the Pinellas County
Water and Navigation Control Authority, and in accordance with the attached drawings which
accurately represent all the information required to be furnished. In the event that this dock
is not built in accordance with the permit or the information furnished is not correct, I agree
to either rem~ dock or zct the deficiency.
Signed: ~ '---. d ~ Cert. No.: C_-<:J~7 /
Company N~me: t".J~~<.J.tlv,.I;I1-e C-orl-S'f r n& Telephone No.: <b13- YC/;;;'-I '! 7/
Address: Lt ~01 w G-~ cA1 B(uJ. T A-vnJP />r) f-"L 33011
I
VI. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
I hereby apply for a permit to do the above work and state that the same will be done according
to the map or plan attached hereto and made a part hereof, and agree to abide by the "Rules
and Regulations" of the Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority for such
construction and, if said construction is within the corporate limits of a municipality, to first
secure approval from said municipality. I further state that said construction will be maintained
in a safe condition at all times, should this application be approved, that I am the legal owner
of the upland from which I herein propose to construct the improvements, and that the above
stated agent/contractor may act as my representative. I understand that I, not Pinellas County,
am responsible for the accuracy of the information provided as part of this application and
that it is my responsibility to obtain any necessary permits and approvals applicable for the
proposed activities on either private or sovereignowped submerged l(lnd,
.;L /--') 110''--- \./ ~..._.:. . .
Date ., " .",' ,.";' Legal Owner's Signature
04eWD/arl/ENVMGMNT/ComBB:2 4/26/94
r~
PRIVATE DOCK
Application" _
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
S t..,
- ~<i. - ...-~ , 10. So
L=-==I"~O-C-'7- ~ --~=~I
-- --- --.. -i~ I :
" . l
--'---lpro8lIViIW ,.- r,. il!1
TOTALSQUAREFEETCS'93?5)
NEW SQUARE FEET "-t 13. 5
WATERWI3 Vt'1DTH 2.. 7 ;J
WATERFRONT WIDTH -'- 2...- 0 '
~
MHW
MLW
BOTI'
~ I
-- ....-_.
--
t'u
,
1
E~G. ~.&., .~! 1" .
,1/
-N-
/"
-
Plan View
(applicant and adjacent docks)
.
f
,.
I
),
I
!
1<;+-1')1 J.,
t..~
.,
c.
I
y
I
I
,
I~I-tt
e
, to .--..-,,-.-.-.-
/
;
)0'
; l
/ I It)--I H-f-
C>
c.
a (
1,'.
"
: 1
c::.
o
o
'0
: f
o
S It ~ L'
o
o
i
o
o
~
C>
.
o
.111 ,
l
o
o
1,)
f~
__fL-~
o
~f
-0
SHORELINE
The undenilD.d doe. not object to the proposed dock and requested variances as drawn in the space pr("lvided above.
Left OwIler I Rilht Owner
Signature
Date
Signature
Date
Water and Navigation Approval
Zoning Approved
CITY OF'ClEARWATER
PLANNING DEPT.
BY fie )&. ~- ~..
OAT OZLtO~
fYll5 2002--00
fEJ<. Ff- Dl -O~ . Z4>
O4/WOI.,l!E"",..QMNT"'rAAd3 4/2ilI'IoI
Application #
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
DISCLOSURE FORM:
In order to alleviate any potential conflict of interest with Pinellas County staff, it is required that the Authority
be provided with a listing of PERSONS being party to a trust, corporation, or partnership, as well as anyone
who may have beneficial interest in the application which would be affected by any decision rendered by the
Authority. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
A. PROPERTY OWNERS:
". ;'
, ':/ / /'
Name: i",~'t:;'b:; 'I //kl-'/J~L< '- /1/,/,.
;tr' I. ,',/ I,'>} I"~ "
Address: ,S /.;";-/J~~'{ :/.()T L j I ' )(
,1,1: ,,'h Ai', ' ,,// , ./ ''>/'. ' "
, ,-'
Name: : ,;>~~_/~; .~:,~: 'X/': /:~/)}., ,-
AddresS'. /~.~)c ,11 11 ';1'"..~, ., j <
i/'" I), ,,.~ ",j, I /", 1. " ~',
,'~- 0(, ,L..Y 1-.. /'t .j:. /, -_^,")I.;/ /./.c,. _'" "
~/ l;
Name:
Address:
Name:
Address:
B. REPRESENTATIVES:
Nam, ~ C4J:l'Q<am'
Address: ~~ U,). ., f3( vet Address:
.-, I4--'vY7 eJc~, ,-L- 33(; I (
I '
Name:
Address:
Name:
Address:
C. OTHER PERSONS HAVING OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Interest is: contingent 0 absolute 0
Name:
/-\. L',h(
specific interest held
D. DOES A CONTRACT FOR SALE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY?
If so, the contract is: contingent 0 absolute 0
YES 0
NO GJ'
Name of parties to the contract:
E. DOES AN OPTION TO PURCHASE EXIST FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY? YES 0 NO G
Name of parties to the option:
F. OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
I hereb'y.~rtify that the information stated above is complete, accurate, and true to the best of my
knowl'edge. '. / .
X ~ /~>~ k. Da" "&/7 ! 0 -'"'L--
[)(8WD/arl/EN\lM3MNTIComBBS 42&^}l
CONSENT TO USE
STATE-OWNED
SUBMERGED
LANDS
Do You LIVE OR Do BUSINESS ON THE WATER?
If so, you may need authorization to use the lands under the. water from the owners of those
lands. This authorization is in addition to any city, county, Department of Enviornmental
Regulation, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers or Water Management District permit.
WHAT LANDS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT AND WHO OWNS THEM?
Sovereign submerged lands are all those submerged lands waterward of the ordinary or mean
high water line under navigable fresh and salt water bodies. The Governor and Cabinet,
sitting as the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, hold title to all of
those lands below navigable waters which have not been previously conveyed into private owner-
ship. Portions of these submerged lands have been designated as "aquatic preserves" and because
of their unique biological, aesthetic or scientific value, they are held and managed to a higher
degree of care. Since the state owns these lands, both public and private entities must obtain
consent to use them.
WRY Is CONSENT NECESSARY AND By WHAT AUTHORITY Is IT REQUIRED?
These lands are held in trust for the use and benefit of the people of the state, as set forth in
the state constitution; therefore, the private use of these lands must be balanced with the need
to conserve and protect the scientific value and beauty of those lands. The intent of the regulations
is to ensure that all sovereign submerged lands are managed primarily for the propagation of
fish and wildlife, and public recreation. The legislative origins of the procedures employed in the
review of applications to use sovereignty submerged lands are contained within Chapters'253
and 258 of the Florida Statutes. These statutes are implemented through rules which are contained
within Chapters 18-14, 18-18, 18-20 and 18-21 of the Florida Administrative Code. It is important
to contact the Department of Natural Resources before you use these lands.
WHAT TYPE OF ACTIVITIES REQUIRE AUTHORIZATION?
Uses that require authorization must be approved before they are conducted. The most commonly
requested uses are the construction of docks; the placement of rip rap; dredging for access or channels;
mangrove trimming; bridge and utility crossings; and beach renourishment projects.
WHAT Do You HAVE To Do AND Is THERE A FEE?
The form of consent that is required depends upon the type of activity that is proposed. Forms
of consent include letters, easements, use agreements, management agreements and leases. The
type of activity proposed also determines the amount of fees; however, commercial uSes will always
require payment of fees.
WHAT HAPPENS IFYOU Do NOT RECEIVE AUTHORIZATION To USE THESE LANDS?
AltGrations to, or structures discovered on, sovereignly, submerged lands without authorization
are subject to lease fees in arrears, with interest, and fiends. In some cases, removal of structures
may also be required.
WHO Do You CONTACT To INQUIRE ABOUT THE USE OF THESE LANDS?
The Department of Natural Resources Division of State Lands fi-eld office listed below.
Dept. of Environmental Protection
3804 Coconut Palm Dr.
Tampa, FL 33619
(813) 744-6100
o.:.tlI\"''D'~rlJ(.''M,,1GMr../T/f1rAA(jI) 412~
Clearwater, Florida, United States
~
CIl Camelot
.1i( Motel and
>- Apartments
III
~
III
:::::!:
sf;.
?e\{(\\s\~
~clearwater Beach Hotel
BaymoC!ITt ~
.~ ~g~ri~O~i~ju~s
;~~
f;tOil ,J@!E"'Shore.P".
uJJL1: ,Koli Bree Motel
Papaya Sf ,ADn's Edgewater
~". . t!J MotelApartments Gulf of Mexico
Trav~
Motel King Cole Motel
Apartments and Marina
(~L.~\?\
Monterey' s'/S
Apartment Motel
......
~
~,
~
.?J.
r-'
i
ta:l
a
~.
Q)"
~
~
f
~
i
6.
. DolpblnPl
60
'11.
~
~r""
v ICJ'
($>~
'9.9$
D6~pasSage
Dl
i
l:l)
a
~
~
>-
~
"'C
C
III
]!
Clearwater
Marianne St
<o~
ri#.J,'!Causaway
"""..!eaptain Memo's
Pirate Cruise
%
~
~.
'9/~
~&
~~
..
Clealwater
Marine
Aquarium
Crab House
seafoodIT1]
Devon Dr
O. B a ~
Copyright@ 1988-2001 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. hllp:llwww.microsoft.com/streets
@Copyrighl2000by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved, @2000 Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved. This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities Cl Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.
@ Copyright 2000 by Compusearch Micromarkating Data and Systems Ltd,
CITY OF (
. '.
L r. W ATE R
Oi:'.,~ (I) Ifl_11
Pergoliul - l'ag.~ 2
.
.--
;.
;>
PlANNING DEPART' . . r
POST OfFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, Fl.ORJ!)A 33758-4748
MUNlr.JPAJ. SERVICES BUllDr"lG, lOO SOllTH MrRTI.F. A\/O.':UE, CUOARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPW'~ (727) ';62-456-;' rAX (727) 562-4576
October 19, 200 I
Conditions of aporoval:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density be limited to 11 dwellings units and the height of the building be
limited to 50 feet, unless an amended application is reviewed by the CDB;
3. That solid waste and stormwater management requirements to be met, prior to
issuance of building permits;
4. That a setback reduction for the hot tub along the seawall be secured through
application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and Flood, as
necessary, prior to issuance of building permits;
5. That all sign.ge comply with Code; and
6. That the Gorgonian (marine life) colony be relocated if it is detennined that it will be
impacted by the proposed dock location, and a letter from the ecological consultant of
record shall be submitted to the City confirming the relocation or lack of impact, prior
to issuance of building permit.
LONG RANGE PJ.^NNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
HOUSINC; DNlS10N
NEIGII[lORHOOD SERVICES
Me. Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP
Florida Design Consultants, Inc
2639 McConnick Drive
Clearwater, Florida 33759
fILE.
RE: Development Order regarding case R.. 01-08-26 at ~l ; ftolphin Po.nt
Dear Mr. Pergolizzi:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On October 16, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to amend an approved site plan
with an increase in density from nine dwelling units to 11 dwelling units, increase the
height of the proposed building from 44.5 feet to 50 feet and reduce the side (east)
setback from 20 feet to 2.5 feet for a multi-use dock, as part of Residential Infill Project
under the provisions of Section 2-404 and 3-601. The proposal includes a five-story,
eleven-unit condominium with an accessory, 500 square foot, multi~use dock. Based on
the application and the staff recommendation, the Community Development Board
(CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (October 16, 2002). All required certificates of
occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
Bases for aooroval:
1. The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project
criteria under the provisions of Section 2-404.
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section
3-9n
3. The proposal complies with Flexible Development criteria for multi-use docks under
the provisions of Section 3-601.
4. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the
necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In
order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please
bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible
Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the
subject of the approval within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an
application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final
determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on October 30,
2001.
BHIAN J, AIIr<;l;SI'. MAYOR.CO,\t~IlSS10NOI
Ell H\~T, VICE M,W(l~-CWt~lIS\I()NEH WIIIIN~Y GillY. COM~\lS\ltlr..-FR
HUIT HA.\tII.nm. COM~\I\'iI()"'-FM * IlllJ, lo,.,-'ior..-. CO~\\\I,'i\IOM:~
'"EVI;A! EMl'l.(lYMENT AND AFFlRMAI'IVE Acmm EMPLO\'I'I("
October 19, 200 I
Pergolizzi - Page 3
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 562-4558.
fry
~
Gerald Figurski, Chairman
Community Development Board
CC: Houle Industries
Mr. Roger Larson
S:\Plaltlring D<,parrmt'nI\C D B\Flo.Vnna/'livt' IJr Fini.,Jud ApplirarimrJ\Dt,lphin PIJint 21 / Dolphin Pojm Ctmdominitlms //.
ApprovdllJolph;n Po;n1211 DEVELOPMENT ORDER,dlil