FLD2003-06027 (see also TDR2003-06003)
,
.
.
l
CASE#: r\,...92-ct)3... o~o2..7
DATE RECEIVED: ~ 0 ':!l
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): W W
ATLAS PAGE #: Z. 711 A
ZONING DISTRICT: -r
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ~r"
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
: Clearwater
-:"_.f;:.~::::-<"...~:-~~..;~
.. <:::.~~.....-....:.....r<::.......-t......:".,,'
Planning Department
1 00 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
J
~
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2} stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ \ 1-0>. 01)
. '
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additional sheets as necessary
n n; (r2 (:;: 11 \117 rc;.. r~~<;I'
" ,','.' I. \ [L,; I, i
Ii ,.----.,--....-.,-..-.!: I :
I '. ." , I. I
I ','\ I !' '. :
i II i I UG 1 8 2003 ;: i i
'\ \ " I
--.J ....i ~ ,.--"
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIO
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 11/05/02)
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME B\~-\-\,:c..k'5: :: (') ; r\\t-) LL-C.- Pr\-T\\' Rn \0 "('(l *,,:e "' S
MAILING ADDRESS ~ b-l t)('\'f. ('" II.,;, ! C' -ni'\:o.- \ D" 0,(\ \" AOL-\rn '?> I I
E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 5\ J. -{)4 (c;71 (fr 1\ ')
. , 'l'"") 'f5Ct- Lj:,3-7d-. -()p~\<:.~
CELL NUMBER: 51::l --cq lo<zr FAX NUMBER: d.~ <if -'8':S~
PROPERTYOWNER(S}:kC"-,,,----\ J. C'\'\,:\\E''\ Cl.,.'\'d f)r:..~a1O--.. 5. fY\(\\p, /
L . (Mus..!.inj:lu~~L owners) r--..A n.. \ <:::.., \\
c,- \J.. '\ r '\'CE? __ \ f m \ \. \*' \ (A. \ '0\ I ~.J'~ "Cf;:>....(l'.\..._~.. 1" \ ... e (-
AGENT NAME(S):' OU..5 '
MAILING ADDRESS: ' ~: '\
E-MAIL ADDRESS:~C' "X\~\\,\\~~r<r'-o '~t';)UMBER:
CELL NUMBER: 't 0 q -00 ~ ~ ) FAX NUMBER:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
a ~e\
'-\ L\~ r;:}?ft.D C1
4:L\ Co '-1) Q:3 ~
2- \+
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL NUMBER:
o
,~q5 O{\;ce:5 )d5/il'8'.~,Pt- ('f).C)).
(aHs, square feet) . . ~
.. ,.-
j. ,I
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): -:se'E" -' U-~ ,"0 rt- j I A:. .
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TQR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ~ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located. c::' C L \ j __ II. CL. 'i
j...-e<2- W.c\1 \C) \ -1= C\-
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. ~ ~ <;" .', \ ~ \ 1/ ~J)
,.Jt"_ f' - L ~. - ,~. ::t= i:-+
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. 5c:e- [~\\ b j-+- II. P(
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
~eL
E-x: \''\ ~ b i~-\- tt fY I
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
~, <;-. I L- L \ il" f'L II
""- J-e~ ~\ \1.'WiT n
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes a erse. effects, inclUding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties. ~ II II
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
I
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
-See.-- ~~\~f\- \\ ,~'\
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
~-
.
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.) C' C:-' , L'" \ I t II -L),. II
~ee - {-X~tOr+_~_+~
,. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
, See _ 7' 'I- h\ b'tF 11 Prll
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatib with adjacent land uses.
. . '\ 1\ II
I
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. . It L (
6.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelo
the parcel proposed for development.' ',\ '
ent project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
.11 '
.J~' The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
~~-E' ___ '7 'f \:\~\')\\- 1\ -\ll'
/8.
Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks. height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole,
5c'L
~'\\J~ 1\ f\ll
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity accordIng to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
Sc:-c.
~\\~~~
tl ~f1
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown Fistrict design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable),
Use separate sheets as necessary..-::::::::., < .. ' ,
"y"e- L..A..~ \ V) rt. 1\ fY l
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
r-;- SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 caples;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study wilrl:5e used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of ail required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of ail solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and oftsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of ail landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) and color rendering if possible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additio~al information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsile elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a .certified arboris!", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles:
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing:
Proposed and required parking spaces: · .
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and iocations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 'I:z X 11) (color rendering if possible)
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21)
o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines:
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRiCT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yz X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS J Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain. I
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all. representations made in this STATE qF. FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ~J:h
application a e true and accurate to the best of my knoVflmM,~nd Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
autho ize C' y representatives to visit and Photogra~~\~\\ Rf.W1 <<91111l ~ LA '\l ^ ~ A.D. 20-'2..3 to me and/or by
descr ed i this application. #<"\ro'<:,:,\~......~/~ ~~ tb~~ Y~\p....eE:-, wl'rt)lSpersonally k~has
~ ,:.~\SSIONi.'. ~ produced ~=~ ~ as
i /u(j iI."'\ 15'<a:r~... \ identification.
=:: .~~~ I!.>~' ~
= . cn~*~ ~
: ..... ::\ - ) n. .
~~\ IICC8632B1 J~ff'~ 0.-C~0...... ''-'~
Si nature of property owner or representative ~ -1.9, ".~ ded~..~~ Notary public,
~: ..olj8..~I~~.~()Y My commission expires: A- LA""=>-\- \'S i :J C00
'''"111\'\
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
3ent By: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVI~ 7274468036j
Ub ..Jun U,j ,.".,.Jvv ~,..
_,I ~':j_
LETTER OF AUTHORIZA rlON .
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with lIedllSlde
_.Iring servlCIS,loc. to act as an agent for L A-'~y eV\c e .} I.t Sctr h~t'l^tt <).
(Property Owner's Name)
And Lo execute any and all documents related. to securing permits
and approvals for the constrUction on the property generally located on the
1;)/' i 'p-, I .L \ t. \' "r; j, 11:.> t
-=--- .<:.i .~11"\ ;1.',.wttA""\!% -r) ',- ie.~Y..v"'...{e.r ~ C lying, within
_\ "> I ,,(P"'raperty Loc:ation) /-...... /
t", n p i I a S Co~nty, State of
l' J <' ~'\_ oj
nfl', ,~/\-.(/(~/Ul.. ~. (j T::c~.....).....--, '
i .-- rj ...~-;":...,_ ':::, I - ,': J I
( fk0 f~-fA.u.-I U..~L<. .? t:~=::-,.,. J...LI:!-l.ye.t1C e. ~_;J'L:; Gt/\---'
Signature of Prop9rtyJowner Print Name of Property Owner
~),' fL..' . \ I '\. ..1 '1. '!R ~ I <.; / 0 3' (/
o I..J... j:JYt (.'A.1"'~::.U/ :J 'r .JJIiI- 7' ,'- """ - to T
Address of p~rtY Owner .... Telephone Number ,.-
~ . ~ ~
{ ; i , " , 1, D._ 1 \...' ~::.? 71 ''1
',- \ ectY-\..V~~' F:.).k'cuV\..{ I ' ; .....l;;; .... /
CityJStateJZip Code
"{ . . I '
>.. ,
I~ ' '. Ci
. I.i~
~~~.~
*'~1c
~
A.IIEGINH.D is\MUlO
I4Y OOWISSIOK t DD 089169
~ftlJ\l5Y5,2IXI
...,ad'""" ilodQtl"","" ~
The """'""'" .,...,...." ~'~', nOWI~~ b em, '918 me U)is ~ ~ day
e:- ,lhJl.C- v-Lui 8L
of 'JLly...~,. . iJ!2. by , _ . tLl i.tL~ ,as_
--- '-'
o is personally known to me. 'ho has produced - '
3$ identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
Slat" of ~l~
County of _. .~{~:SrJ..J~
COmmission #
@Q
.~~ 8..9JLe:l
Notary Public
(signature)
(SEAL ABOVE) A. U~/JJ:Gt.D~'ZJlA4)t.-O (Name of Nolary Typed~ Printed or Stamped)
Sent By: NOR~HSIDE ENGINEERING SERJlltS'
I
72 74468036 ;
05 Jun 03 ~OAM;JOb 516jpage 1/1
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with .arlbSlde
. .
_ f'" D,} -
EJlatneenngServlces.IDC. to act as an agent for 41.u. t~e.-iAc. e. ~ { D[y~jYt,t/'{~,
(Property Owners Name) 1(' . I
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits .//1-- i II e j-..
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
::;;~, r;;-:V . ,j " ,'\'-........
,::;}. 0"7 D V' \ q PI 'f-u j .:C"~~. \.-) y-. , lying within
". (PropertY Location)
1\,11 *' t/ CCJ ,County, Slate of f::- I
; tf' :);::tA..{.' /71 , '* C- ) L,L0Lt<...-
'4-' - ~ ....P'l..--.-- \..... 1 I
LCLVI c~ (TF~~=--~ .___ L A-u ~ e."c e S .'.., ,.4: i I t.h---.
Signature of Prop,erty Owner Print Name of Property OWner
,/
d ;t E (' ;;;(,khi)cJ ~v IJr JJ 'f 1..../</0- 0 50 (j
Address of P erty Owner ' Telephone Number
.r"\ / J ~ il (-'i
c:, l--f Gr~'M~A/ ~eu Gl. . I ,357(; 1
City/State/Zip Code
Slah,o( ~~
County of ",.0 ~~
1JItZ..' ~
TheJorenning instrurTlt~l1l W<lf: 3cknowledge before me this W,,:I:Z- (:I'day
. ~ i ^",(1 kiJte; 111" t..SL -. ,.l.k:-
,~ hi I\L YJY"'-::;'-;..... ~~
or~V..._.2 .bY~ .Jl1U€:tas_
o is personally knowlllo me or' . 0 has produced
(SEAl ABOVE)
(Signature) ....:~
Commission#_, 1>)) l1~
A . etG' II-i'~t> ~.~~UI,.D (Name of Notary Typed; Prinled or Stamped)
Notary Publk:
as identific<ltion and who did (Oid not) lake a
"'V:.~t-
*~..
~~
A. REGINALD T8UJlO
MY COUUISSION . DD 089189
EXflIIla FeIinlIy 50 21108
_ThNIludgIl"--'_
'.nt By' ~RTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVI~ 727....03.;
U~ ~un U~ IU4lllM,uvv J'V," ~~- .,.
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve. as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with .Irlllslde
. '
I ~ I
EIIIlBeerillg SeNCes.lnc. to act as an agent for !-at),. '("Ct-l c. ~ 3' \4 )::r~r' b(.-. t'f, C
(Property Owner's Name) .1 f, /'...,/ \-.:'.)" '"
And to execute any and all documents releted to securing pennits .' ': ,
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
-; oS 'D- ~.: /'; I.. .t'./ ^'. 1', ;'-'
,-,i-" ~ I v VI. . .u.... 1.,V i._I r , lying within
,;; . (Prope Location) f-'
"", ,I /l E.) I ~ s County, State of j- !
(7!~:'dA-~ S....Py<-.AJLfU---"
J) ;~fLL' ,'-!:.Vu:A II ~... i:t-._.-~
Signature of ProPerty Owner
/._,~) " t ~~"'...; 1.40 . ....1 .' ,', i i.J,.
(~jL"';' . '-'!'!'-, r 'd.....CL--i..::.~ .\.:., .~.~i'- -1
Address of ptJPerty. Owner
{/1 / " ../ ' ., ".' '- ~ . .~\ ,.',',_. . I
'_" r~~ ~?,....-r ~_\':r,./ r '"._~"fi .V-j ~>-"- (:......1....,; l
CityJStatelZip Code
. II
L (il.-t.y e.JIt C e :So A I i ek-'
Print Name of propertY Owner
,....... ." _' , . i ~'1 I /' -<.. jJ'
I ~.7 I __I.; )!. Ic< .- ---' x.' y..
Telephone Number
~. J 3~?fc 7
SlalttO( ~
County of _~I ~'{tt~
1... ,,,,,,,,,,,ng insIrUI...." woo -"';!oe befOre me INs _1,'2.: 'f!L '.y
~~~ l.t{u6iL
of \JV~_. 206 by gPilUll.'1 fi,.t,lIll..~S_
~OnallY known to ~whO has produced
",., ~ A. RE6INAlD TEflMUlO
~M".." MYCOMMISSIOIUD00891fi 35 identlfica1ioo and who did (did not) lake an oath.
* ...
~ alWS:ftbNlY5,m
~~Cf'~ lloOdOII1lwU8UdlIOl-""-
CommisSion #-
Notary Public
[Signature) .
(SEAL ABOVE) A- ee.c., j~ ~~~.U~ . (Name of Notary Typed~ Prinled or Stamped)
.
.
Exhibit "A" to Comprehensive Infill Application "REVISED"
205 Brightwater Drive - Brightwater Pointe
NES Project # 0322
Description of Request:
To construct a 20 unit, five-story condominium (4 levels of living area above one level of
parking) with a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15' to 0' (to pavement),
reduction of the side (west) setback from 10' to 5' (to pavement), reduction ofthe side
(north) setback from 10' to 5' (to pavement), and reductions of the rear (east) setback
from 20' to 18' (to building) and from 20' to 0' (to pool deck and boardwalk), and from
20' to 5' for the pool and from 20' to 6' for the spa with increases of building height from
35' to 54' (to roof deck) with an additional 6' (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and
16' (from roof deck for open gazebos) and to permit parking that is designed to back into
the public right-of-way. The four existing docks containing seven slips will remain for
the sole use of the residents on site. Section 3-908 of the City of Clearwater Community
Development Code allows cantilevered awnings that are attached to the building, to
project ten feet into any required setback within the Tourist District; therefore, the
proposed cantilevered awning at the front of the condominium building will not require a
setback reduction as it projects only six feet out from the structure. Additionally the
applicant is proposing to construct three mechanical rooms as well as elevator rooms on
top of the building that will not exceed the allowable 16' height limitation. This request
for 20 units on site is made possible through the utilization of Transfer of Development
Rights for three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive which is also included as part
of this application.
Written Submittal Requirements
1. The surrounding area is currently undergoing a transition from predominantly
small motel uses to high-end multi-family condominium and townhome uses.
The proposed five-story condominium project will be in harmony with the Beach
By Design principals, which call for 2-4 levels of living area above parking. The
existing docks will not be altered or modified at this time. These docks, which
support seven slips, will be for the sole use of the residents on site.
2. The proposed condominium project will not hinder or discourage redevelopment
of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the intent of the Beach by Design
program for the Small Motel district. Although a height variance is being
requested for this proposal, Section 2-803 of the City's Community Development
Code does offer the flexibility of requesting a height of 35-100'. The proposed
height along with the decorative parapet walls and decorative roofs with columns
(considered by City Staff to be gazebos) is an appropriate Mediterranean Revival
architectural style for this cul-de-sac location on Brightwater Drive. With the
construction ofthis high-end condominium on this cul-de-sac location, and the
tropical landscaping proposed, other surrounding property owners should be
.
.
inspired to come closer into compliance with the intent of the Beach by Design
program.
3. The proposed 20-unit condominium project will create less of an adverse impact
to users of the area than the more intense surrounding and existing on-site
overnight accommodation and multi-family uses, as the subject site will be
occupied by long-term residents as opposed to transient tenants. Visibility
triangle requirements will be met providing safe vehicular and pedestrian
movement where the driveways meet the right-of-way. The four proposed
parking spaces at the front of the building will be for guest parking only and due
to the cul-de-sac location, vehicles backing out of those spaces will not interfere
with traffic flow along Brightwater Drive. Retention areas will be constructed at
the rear of the site eliminating runoff onto adjacent properties.
4. This property is located at the end of Brightwater Drive on the cur-de-sac where
there is a minimal amount of traffic. Future traffic congestion will be minimized
with the proposed on-site parking. The four proposed "back-out" guest parking
spaces in front of the building will be occupied on a minimal basis and will not
infringe on traffic flow along Brightwater Drive.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the vicinity as it is a residential use
comparable to other proposed and/or recently developed condominiumltownhome
uses. The character of the immediate vicinity is in a process of transition from
more intense overnight accommodation uses to high-end residential living.
6. The proposed condominium minimizes any adverse affects on adjacent properties,
as the building itself will meet required setbacks. Visually the design of the
building will enhance Brightwater Drive and will be aesthetically pleasing for the
cul-de-sac location. Acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation will not be issues
as this is not a commercial use and should not generate any more noise or odor
over and above what a single-family residence would.
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. In order to take advantage of this particular property's prime location,
deviations to the required rear yard setbacks for the proposed deck, pool spa
are necessary. The irregular shape of the site and the cul-de-sac location make
any significant development difficult without variances to the required front
and rear setbacks. Additionally, in order to provide adequate on-site parking,
side setback reductions to pavement on both the north and west sides of the
site are being requested in order to allow vehicles adequate drive area into the
parking garage. This five-foot setback will be for a minimal approximate
distance of 34 feet and will not run for the entire depth of the property. Beach
By Design calls for two to four levels ofliving area over parking of which this
project complies. Section 2-803 of the City of Clearwater Development Code
allows for 35' to 100' heights through the Flexible Development process.
This proposed height will not only allow for the construction of units of
marketable size but will also lend to a Mediterranean architectural style
appropriate for this cul-de-sac and waterfront location. The proposed parapet
walls and balusters lend to the architectural style and without them being at
.
.
six feet in height may appear out of sync with the rest of the building. The
proposed decorative roofs with columns ("gazebos" per City Staff) on top of
the roof deck will be at the maximum allowed height as with mechanical
rooms of 16' above the roof deck. These "gazebos" are decorative features
and should not to be considered as habitable space. Residents will park below
the building itself and the four front parking spaces will be utilized solely for
extra visitor spaces. The four extra visitor spaces will not be occupied on a
regular basis. The four existing docks containing a total of six boat slips on
site win remain to be utilized only by the residents.
2. This project will only help to increase the fair market value of abutting
properties. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing fair market value
of the subject site (Lots 27, 28 and 29 combined) is $1,274,400.00. Upon
completion of improvements, the site is estimated to be worth approximately
$15,840,000.00.
3. Attached dwellings are permitted uses within the City of Clearwater as well as
the Tourist District.
4. Surrounding uses include existing small motelJapartment uses and multi-
family condominium/townhome uses up and down the Brightwater Drive
corridor. One lot away and to the northwest of the site is a new 3-story, 10-
unit townhome use currently under construction.
5. Comparable sites with such a prime waterfront location are not readily
available within the City of Clearwater. This immediate vicinity is going
through a redevelopment process from small motel and apartment uses to 2-4
levels of living area above parking. Similar cul-de-sac waterfront sites are not
commonly available for development.
6. With the construction of the proposed high-end, 20-unit condominium and the
installation of the proposed tropical landscaping, the subject site and
immediate vicinity will be significantly upgraded.
7. The proposed design of this condominium project will be a significant
improvement for not only the site itselfbut also the whole of Brightwater
Drive. This project will also provide a waterside landmark of a magnitude
expected for the redevelopment of the Clearwater Beach area.
8. Flexibility in regards to the required rear setback is justifiable due to the cul-
de~sac location of the site, irregularly shaped property and the need to design a
project with functional outdoor amenities. The proposed five foot setback to
pavement along the north and west sides will allow a driveway into and out of
the parking garage. The additional height being requested will provide for an
architectural style appropriate for this specific waterfront/cul-de-sac location.
The additional height will not adversely impact adjacent properties due to the
varying angles to the proposed building that are intended to take advantage of
the available grand waterfront views. The six-foot high parapet walls and
balusters are decorative architectural features that would appear out of scale
with the rest of the building at a lower height. The proposed zero front
setback will allow for four guest parking spaces directly in front of the
building. Additionally, the request to back out into the right-of-way is a result
of the four guest spaces. This project will be a gated community so it is
.
.
important to provide some additional parking spaces for visitors. As several
other projects along Brightwater Drive have been approved allowing vehicles
to back out into the right-of-way, this project should be no exception.
Although this is not a town home project with individual garages, the subject
site is located at the end of the cul-de-sac therefore no adverse issues are
anticipated by allowing just four spaces to back out into Brightwater Drive.
All other parking will be within the parking 'garage below the building.
9. All required parking for the proposed condominium units will be provided on
site.
10. The design of the proposed building complies with the design guidelines
contained within the Beach by Design program in many ways. The
Mediterranean architecture will be aesthetically pleasing and will promote an
integration of form and function. The proposed design will add to the creation
of a sense of a "beach-community neighborhood" within Clearwater Beach.
The proposed tropical landscape material will lend toward differentiating
Clearwater Beach from other beach areas and other intensely developed areas
in Pinellas County. The required parking spaces will be contained within the
parking garage below the living level as opposed to massive open parking
areas, which would be more visible to the right-of-way and surrounding
properties. The street level of the proposed building will be pedestrian friendly
with its proposed architectural features and tropical landscaping.
.
RECEIVED
JUL 1 6 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ROOF TILE -
MeA etA v TILE 18204
,"
MAIN BUILDING COLOR-
GLIDDEN HAZELWOOD 30Y"(651258
GARAGE WALLSI
ELEVATOR TOWER/TRIM-
GUDOEN SOFT GOLD 30YY64J331
RAILINGSI FASCiAl
WINDOW TRIM-
GLIDDEN KJTTEN WHITE 30YY781035
.
Rece~vec::
6/12/ 3
8:19AM;
.
Re....ie Termulo
. .- '!..~"---""-J ,&"....-uuu'-'uJ
7272988589
-> NORTHSIDE IINEERING SERVICES;
727 8589
U~ Jun 03 S;06AU;JOb 531;Page 2/4
Page 4
. .
10.4
Jun 12 03 09:00a
This Warr:anty Deed
r-t_ dIi. 4th liar vt olaauary A 1). 2Q0.2
ll)f aOb.rt: CJonlall, Suci:..eor 2'net.. of tJa.
Alfr.d P Preat!c. TruMC dated GI/~lt'5
be~a' Colli.. die ...wI. 10
Larrr J .~~1.~ &ad .arbara 9 Millar,
~uab_ci -.ad tttr.
.... poll ctlfi<< IIIIdmI ..:
1. ...t l.och Lll)]i'd Par_w.y
Beltoa. NO '4012
Gr-aat:.... 'r.. ld. . :
~""'fIIItct uIlW 'lie 11-';
..........u ".. "Ie.. .. - ',-. .., -'UIIll<<' .llClUlIr "" lac ,...._ ... llIIo --1IIItII ... ...
...... ....llOC..~IC....I"c~ ..., -..". 114 ..........1.. ~ _ .....'C_ MIl ....... wJ ..~,
WitDeuda, lIIat tile "_01. for.llDd ia CGMide,~ 0' tit, '"'' ttI $ 10. DO
aM ~ "'lII/)fC CGIlfidcr.MioIla, ~ -Ilcnlvt II ~ ~ ~ ._.~. IeUA. .al...... r......
~. r.-..ey,.. mnfirtN WIIO ,,. ii_~, .all...... cata;,1 ,. .......e I. 1>1_11..
Cauftl" Fk",". "'ii';
Lac ;Z? "y.J.d. Su.bdlvl.1on Wo. 2, .eCOrdlllg to tho plat tJurE'aot
~ecord.d ia Plat Book ~7. .ag. 32 aftd 31. PWblio aeGord. of
'!D.ll.. ~ty, r~orida.
.t/.J G~ '1'0 c:!OV_.ule.. r....r10t;lOQ.. ......nt. ot 1"IICord IIn4 tax.. ~or
t.... C\UI'Z'1tllI t: year.
~~)
0.2'-006988 ..IA,..- ."~UOi' . .,..,"
P I N(LL.'l/iO r.o @II( I 17l5~ "-c. a394
:..........
..
Said ~~~rty 1. not tb. ha...~d of tha arantorC.) UDd.r ~ la..
Gad e~~tuttOD ot the Stac. ot Plor1da iQ Cba~ n.ithar QI:'''~(.)
or aD7..-ber. 01 e~o hou..bol. of OrantorC.) E'..ld. tb..eOG.
~
P.E'cel rd."tif1catioa ~.rl 8/2'/15/04932/000/1270
~_!apdIt.r".".'dIe I~. ~$ 1IJd~ tbem\l bco'U11lJ1l1orilllll)"llile~iI""
--~o Hawc Md .. Hold. 1IIc...., III fer simple loccm-.
4.... ... II'" IIntby CDWIuIII~ wiell 'iilf P'~ Ib 1"- &r.llllDl III Jawftdlyae., 0' Slid ... ill Ice _Ie:
IIur. .- II-or ... IODd ... -' ~ftII -bUnt, 10.:11 ad w."C'y Mid ..; IIIlII JIle Uwot ,,~ 'Ilfl~ -1If1"
dIG nrl& .. Mid '-d ... .nll debet .- &amr apiullIlc I"""" e~m vt III pa_ _,"",,*-: .. t'" ~ IW ~
ftcc .ra......iIIrIIIJR II"" &uo ,,"!\Ii.. ,~ Ia Dclarlllbn 31. :ZOOl
fa W..... ~, ..... Wd trMltOJ. ~ 1'11IIIIf MId .... tlIcK pIl:JCDIIl1Ic day _ Jat t'inlllllaw
110ft....
.~. 18I<<1-!'deliwnJ i/t u." P"II1ICt:
,. ' .
JI,-t _ ~
.~,?
.. .;
,
A--
.~.~...........
:r-- .---.~ acito?u..../~....l~
. "abf)r!: -=--. co.. &:'
~.t.. of ~h. ~Cr.. p
Prootic. T~u.t .~
...... .. ~...
-
--.~......
I;i)
-
.4a4 ~ .........
rw
.'k_ 0' Florida
C.-oI,ot PSnella.
~ rOftJOtDa inIInInIaw "'as ~lIaft.Wpd IM::IO~ _ 1_ t tb !My 01 JaIlUUY
.z002.lly
A6be1:'~ Qar.aQ. Sue.a.or rru.t.. a~ the Alfred ~ Prafte10. ~c d.t~
O'fU/U .
~ is pcnGIlIl/ly -- fa IIIC 01' we.o b& P'VdUeC<<I Phot:o Xl) . Wnatir~.
[f.~ -....~.::;
~~ ".I ""'t{'''''~'''..'l'''''.,,,
".' . ,.....'- ....,.... :--
_"116_ '. ___..__ .~
,....--) ~
b-~
~ Puhlic
...... ,.,.,.. -- -- ..'
...... ......__i.,..._ ~"_."'.
...
""
....
M
rt
.e
1-
;: .
e:
~
~
,..
...
m
I
.;.:
..
"
.~
...
o
~
~
E
"'"
!
~
I
-
~
. !'
~
.;
NORTHSIDE~INEERING SERVICES;
727~8858S
Oti Jun 03 8:07AMiJOO
W/lJ
, "
._-, 't
. ..
...............: . 11),6 .t'<<t ~ .~_.:...-
. ~J mo . (p4,oii.;T
....................-. . '.. .- .... . '.,.. .
WITNISSEnI: . "-...~,..... e...../I....,.. _IlISIO.. ~.......,,,.,,,,,,,.., '*-. ........
"l!ft"~."'" ~.....,..... ........ ... .... ...... ............,............ _...
.'-... ~ m.;..... ..... ~1nel1l1. . c~. ~. -11:'
."---'-',.
. . Lot i8':ran:rDE sUBDlvxsrolf~, ~." ';cc:'o~dj,n~ -:"to i~~: PlAt'
. Chea-e-ot. .. .rel.:oxd..d .i.n..pj..t Rohk 2", P;l~ 32 alld.');); of
Publi~ '.~~ord..oC P1nell~. County. tlo~1~3.
.....".
t.}~C!l .
, ,.
6/12/ 3 8:19AM; I 7272988589 ->
Received:
~ R le Termulo
.J u n 12 'O.j 0 S: 00 a...~ t;._..-. __......, . ,. ....UUU.lD;
"'"1''' ,..... '-
~:.' ... .;:, . .
".; ~.. .
-:~ .
-,:.:: . --",,,; .
~:' .; ( 0 ......., n_..,. 'IItI'U: It, CIoaAaWA"'. 11II('.
;L:.:.......:. ,1 .',,~ A...:.l]!lI<'......., .
'7 ~ ~,""'Jm-
,,-S O. nit ~....... 'YO "iDturPER' PI'rRU2:ZELLO
"" ' . .. .....~OIIa..u.AYD..-.:.
'. -~.......---~. -, .''-
~.---'....
...~ ~."."""fII~'
-....ill~.____ _ A . .......""lL '. ,
.. ~~"'''-'''''''''''''(IiolIoW)~ oo-.l5~a ....... .~. ,;~
", ..-- 'a""115/aU12/noo/~..._..,_... ..~. ~~ ~...._..
:t ~. d- ---",-,-,~......,."..., , ...._ . .
) , ~l kl...,tlaE *": OOOS0022 .
,'" . AlEC ....~o;J . . ..
:;": ~r3UW:.,. "!1AA~NTY.DEED
~". Ia:' .--_._._._.___.._.._.-_......"""..~__,
.:.~ 'Ff~ .
~ . ..... . ". w~ D.I ~.. 2nd o!l'l' Oil. J'un!ll . .A.D. 2->00 . ~
.,:,.; ,.., " RADI08D E. 'lUrtNl and MARY C. bINI. buelNanc:l .nd wif.,
~. ~:3~,.~;1. __._. / -:~..~.:
~~ Q( IMi. ...... ~ C<IlIcd....-. .......... ......_:
. . Nil .._z-:. . . . .
..'"t.IaUltl:lt'ei-=j~MrLLa and BiUiifAiiI ~-'''l''~:b~nd ilmt.wi '-" ...:-...-:_-:: '..._ ...: '-. '
TOCflhH ~th, but ldLhuuL -n-lmt)i', rlpt:r~~ ripu. U trl)', "IJIlUl'tenMl
~to.
-J
(
,...1.-.. ....llQI( Ii., ,
~ L'bWY. FURl-. .
--. ..,
~~~~ ,.
....,. ,
III' . a; . 1'5: . '1J'Ii-
-.fIIl,.. .'.1' " ...!D
'-".--. .-3' ~JIQ
" ... '1L5II.5o
~- -~ G.5lO.:
. _.IfM' _ ~
, " III .9\, .
. 8" "
.~
.
..
Page 5
p.5
531 ;pago 3/4
. r;,'.,'2.,,~
f:.:......-/
..~~~7'i~
... ~ ......
~~.~r{;;
.'~' ..;.~
~ .,;.,""~:~
~:~~~!~'~:~~
....:..~.t'~
:..:~.~
...~'--;#
.~:'i;l.:.:~.
.- ~~~i'
...t. .
-I:,::""I~"
. ..
~.
'!4l
!l
_> NORTHSIDE~INEERING SERVICES;
7272S8858S
O~ Jun 03 8:07AU;Job 531jPage. 4/4
Rece~ve~:. ,6\12/3 8:20AM; .
Jun 12 03 OS: 0 ~a__,____.~,:ct.~.~Y~..o.:.~;r~o!~;4oOllU;'~j
, . 'C .
. ~ -~""~o...aw.e..~::---. '8524179:7
, ij! ~iS~, J'~b.i'tltur t ,
.. . '.. .
-..- ~ 1llI...... - - ~.. -.sa -- ... ....,.. '::":r' J ~
:.a-~-.: ~, ::. ~ _.. :. "::::..:;"=- ::':-...": ___-= ==
..--... . .
7272988589
... .
.
'-:.' ..-..
016115 P5SE.828
.
-. .
.
...
..
'"
..
.
JW.Ws . JSth
~tJirHtl
, ZaIGNI~ SOt,\T% and m:F~1A SO'An. bis wife"
of 1M c...tJ 01 Pinel la, .. .. -a.a. ..,.. Florida
,.,., ., tile ftftII ..... ..
I..AIJItfN(J; J. MlLu;R.-M BAiuwtA- S~ ')qLLB. lib vife
)Iho!)C -11 ins lkIdress Is: 103.0.9.' I.~o' Bou 1 ev. rd = Leawoo~
. . .. ."
a( .... ~ fill John$of\ '.. .. ... StIIII fIl
,.rt;r at .... .... JUt. c;.
. dIq 01
Nov~lftber
, II,. A..o, gss
/I
lCan.:s~6 ' 66206
t
~A ....~...., a.c die .... ,.." 116....... .... -" ~.. ad Ie ~ 01 .. _
III 'ha ....... ... ~~ . _J Ul_........... "Rlf rrff " .......... ~ ,., tail
.... pat. .... ...... ...... .. .....,. ---...... .............. ....~..... .. IIIlL fit tM
... .,.,. 01. ..........,. ... ..... MIl ...... lII'twr. Ibe.,.... ...... t.... ..... .....
-- I8d .., .. .. c.r.7 f1I . PiDellas'~' .. ~.of I'IMW., fa wit:
... ' .. .
.... -'II ~ ..iIII'~.'
. .... .~ .
I.Dr 1WEN1'Y-NI~ (29). MrSIDE SUBDIVISION 1<<). .2. , ' ,
....--- ,.-----. ...<( .....--.--.,-.---........-.-.. '.. ;'.~_.....,:-.l....,:.__,..___...._..._..
; acea~ii9. t~ ~. or ~l~t "t~ret)r "lis t~~rdct;l in . . . .
. ....J
Plat look 21 ~ h,(es 32. and. 33; 'Plbiic Reco~ of
.'. ... ...
Pu.llu, cAunty, 'Florida.' . .,
, . .
-
.
r
.. .It. e1.ea... l' ~ . . . .
-- ~. 40..:.e' . .f , ~ ' "f . I.' ~ " , g
i .1 OS L"":r:.o D D..._:-"'~"; ~, .....~~.
fa Iftt .,. ...:., .......~.....-.. ...... ""-'I'" T. ,. .
, . ' ~. ..... ....... ~ . . '";
:-.... -:T.a~o.4..a:t~ .:,. ... ~~",: . . .
:_ . '_ ~ ': ". . . II : . ,- ~ ,,- " -.
!; th~r~n.~~ is ~ ~jeci. to re5ir1c~io.u. TeSeTVatigns Mr:I '_~~~"
, .l\lCO; UId also 6Ubject to r.xes, .~. -the 'year 1935-and ,jabS,.e.quen1 ~_ . ' . .'
.,... ", .. .. . . .
... '. ('.'" . _..'. .
.. ... .. ..- of ... ftrat.P*t .. ...., rvst;..... ta.. WIll." ..... ~ ~ ~ ...... ' .
... ~. ~,'" .... ~ It .. ........,. .~. J._.....:. 'J.....~ ..'. ' : . .'=
.. . . ...... "
... - In ... - ""~ Ibe.... ,................ JiaIt ... ....J 1'4.'.. .... ............
~ ........w... tip........... .' " · ,.., .' -..- '. .~
'... .'- ....4."'."" . :. . : f,' , .' '. ....
'_..~ ~~.~J~ 'fi:'. ~:4) ~~..p'".. '.
. .... I c:rLl&T'7' . ,. ~,
.,- ,e',", ,_ ---:.~~ , . . ~
' .. " .', . . II
, ..' . . -:-:...:.... . .
"p
c.. . .... ....
" .---=-----r-l~.,
~.
-
'14"4lmll3 11
. ... .
.
. .~I '
~ TIlT'"
.1.
. .5."
....... '
'.&'.I3,t~~ .
.
..
;. .
I .
.
. '
....
~.
,
..
. .. I 't.
. iii ' ..'. ,; ..... - .
.. ...,J!J.... .1. :-: . ;,..... '. '
.. . .
..'
.'..-
"
-.. ..
r I::
i 4ll!'
::::1 ~
" I
. -.-... :'5 '.4'S' t,H .~. ,.
8'1'''. OP . ':R.DRIDA" . :~'. ,'..~ _'_
c:o~ . .PINE1.I4S . _. .~J .' -. , . . ., ..
'. .'-~..~Cm~' ~...;~.~~.....;..~,~/...~_
...... Ie .......1rtW' ..... ....... ~ " ...- . . .' .
-- - -......... -~._- ,.,., ............"... ft"'t......~ ...:.... .... IA .
.
. ..
Page 6
10,6
.... ,
:-;:' .=~~-
~.,
"
..
, .-.."..
. '. .
"
~.-...
" ...
,. , ,
..;" ,...
01:'" ,'...
. ,'f,:~. ,'.,..
, t . J ' . . '.
I~ . : '-'.~ I
, 'r','" .;. ~',
. ~. "...',./
:. .' ~ ,,- -, '. .'- .. :
, . '. .
f' "':,',
'r" - . ;'.
. , . .... ..:~*:'~
r.: ,""'.,
'. t:.'," .
1 " .
· . r. . . .>.~. .
. ;.... .''-' '.
~ . '. ,;'.:: '
''',;:~ .~. ....
.. :;. .
.' ~ ~-.. ..'
. k"'~: ". '~.~.:"':':
. '.
. ,: .,.,.
'.; ( , '. '.1,,_.
; ...., ..
." . -,
.. '.I
I . . '.
i . -i"~..,
~:...;. .':" .-:.,
. . .
, '1-/" ,~.,~ ~
~ "":;.. ':, ~ : ~'.'"
. .
.
.... ....'~
'. ". ','
Nonhsille
&~ s~ 11tt,
.
CIVIL ·
LAN D PLANNING ·
ENVI RON MENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
FOR:
BRIGHTWATER POINTE
PROJECT
O ~ (':: 1, :.1 ~T re '-;:-\1
L~; . .. ! ,- .. I'
.-.-.._.._._. ..._...-- - I
- I ' I
" ,! ,
,. " . ./
JUI AUG 1 8 2003 Ii ~
h.Ai"Nii~G & DEVELOPMf.:Nl Lei:>
CI ry OF CLEARWATER
August 2003
Project No. 0322
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
25,918 SF
20,852 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
5,066 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP B)
92.33
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.76
T.O.C. =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
.
.
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS AND 2)
0322
25,918 SF =
20,852 SF =
o SF =
5,066 SF =
0.59 ACRES
0.48 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.12 ACRES
98
100
69
25,918 SF
20,852 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
5,066 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
25,918 SF =
16,142 SF =
668 SF =
9,108 SF =
0.59 ACRES
0.37 ACRES
0.02 ACRES
0.21 ACRES
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 25,918 SF
IMP. AREA= 16,142 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN = 98
POND AREA= 668 SF OF POND AREA @ CN = 100
PERV. AREA= 9,108 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN = 69
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION. !fiDROLOGIC GROUP B)
CN = 87.86
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.66
T.O.C. =
25,918 SF
16,142 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
668 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
9,108 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
.
.
PROJECT NAME:
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
PROJECT NO. :
0322
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA:
BOTTOM EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
5.10 3,183 0.073 2,712
4.60 2,363 0.054 1 ,464
4.42 2,068 0.047 1,097
4.31 1,894 0.043 902
4.17 1,660 0.038 663
4.03 1 ,426 0.033 452
3.89 1,192 0.027 271
3.74 957 0.022 120
3.60 723 0.017 0
T.O.B. EL.=
D.H.W. EL.=
W.Q. EL.=
TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
25,918 SF
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.50 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
1,080 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
4.42 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
1,097 CF
I
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,2SYR,24HR,PRE
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.59 ac.
SCS Curve Number 92.33
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCJA 0.00 %
2
en
'+-
~
~
o
C
::l
a:::: 1
0,
o
2
HYDROGRAPH : BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,PRE
4
6 8
10 12 14
Time (hrs)
Time of peak: 12.1 hrs
16 18
20
Qpeak: 2.3813 efs
Vlolal: 17,257 ff'
22
.
e
24
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,2SYR,24HR,POST
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.59 ac.
SCS Curve Number 87.86
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
HYDROGRAPH : BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
2
.
.
~
:t::
o
c
&1
o
o
2
4
6 8
10 12 14
Time (hrs)
Time of peak: 12.1 hrs
16 18
20
22
24
Qpeak: 2.2826 cfs
Vtotal: 16,095 ft3
.-.~----_. -
e
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area 723.00 ft2
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 1,464.00 ft3
Pond Length to Width Ratio (LjW) 4.00
Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base 0.00 ft
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 2.50 ft
Elevation of Starting Water Level 3.60 ft
Elevation of Pond Bottom 3.60 ft
Is there overflow ? y
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.10
Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 20.00 ftjd
Factor of Safety 2.00
Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 8.40 ftjd
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.20
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of PondjExfiltration Trench 1.00
Time Increment During Storm Event 2.00 hrs
Time Increment After Storm Event 6.00 hrs
Total Number of Increments After Storm Event 6.00
Runoff Hydrograph File Name: 322POST.SCS
Time of Peak Runoff: 12.12 hrs
Rate of Peak Runoff: 2.28 cfs
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left Right
Groundwater Control Features - Y IN N N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Impervious Barrier - Y IN I N N N N 0.00 I
Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00
I'
I
e
.
MODRET
ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
Structure Type: BROAD CRESTED
Crest Elevation 4.42 ft
Crest Length 4.00 ft
Coefficient of Discharge 3.31
Weir Flow Exponent 1.50
Number of Contractions 0.00
Design High Water Level Elevation 4.60 ft
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
I PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST I
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
00.00 - 2.44 2.500 0.000 *
0.00000
2.44 2.500 0.01407
0.01317
4.44 3.600 0.01227 0.00
0.01137
6.44 3.693 0.01216 0.00
0.01296
8.48 3.975 0.01473 0.00
0.01646
10.48 4.434 0.01595 155.67
0.01544
12.48 4.583 0.01363 6,417.70
0.01182
14.48 4.542 0.01082 10,517.00
0.00983
16.48 4.474 0.01005 11,720.00
0.01026
18.48 4.460 0.01002 12,484.00
0.00978
20.48 4.453 0.00943 13,071.00
0.00908
22.48 4.448 0.00917 13 542.00
0.00925
24.48 4.444 0.00851 13 906.00
0.00630
30.48 4.351 0.00578 13 906.00
0.00525
36.48 4.273 0.00489 13 906.00
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
0.00452
42.48 4.207 0.00425 13 906.00
0.00398
48.48 4.148 0.00377 13 906.00
0.00356
54.48 4.095 0.00339 13 906.00
0.00322
60.48 4.048 13 906.00
Maximum Water Elevation: 4.583 feet @ 12.48 hours
* Time increment when there is no runoff
Maximum Infiltration Rate: 0.971 ft/day
Recovery @ > 60.480 hours
=-
-
c
o
:;::;
CO
>
CI)
jjj
...
CI)
1i5 4
~
INFILTRATION: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
4.5
.
.
5
10
55
60
15
20 25 30 35 40
Time (hrs)
Max Water Elevation = 4.58 ft
45
50
..._______ _ __~______~___.-.,.,.,_.....__.,._,__.~_.__,_.___~____,_~..____.___.__.'__ _ _____._____~.._._~.._____..h_..,,~,'___'.~.._..___..<___..,_______ .__"___. __._,~__.______ .._._._._~___..._._..._~ ..__.'. _",._,",_u, ._.___,.- _"",,_,"'_--c-__
.
.
NORTH SIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
PROJECT NO.:
0322
VOLUME PROVIDED = 1,097 C.F.
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.42 POND AREA (SF) = 2,068 S.F.
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 3.60 POND AREA (SF) = 723 S.F.
UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 2.60
COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT/MIN
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 14 FT
SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH
ELEV. AVG.HEAD INCR HEAD L(AVG) HYD. GRAD. IL TER AREt FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME
FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN.
4.42 2,068
1.47 0.21 2.75 0.53 22 1.06 389 368
4.22 1,732
1.26 0.21 2.75 0.46 22 0.91 320 352
4.01 1,396
1.06 0.21 2.75 0.38 22 0.76 251 330
3.81 1,059
0.85 0.21 2.75 0.31 22 0.61 182 296
3.60 723
TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME =
1,141
C.F.
TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME =
22.4
HOURS
Nonhside
&~~ Sf!l~ 1He.
.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 18, 2003
To: City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
AUn: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: FLD2003-06027 & TDR2003-06003 - Brightwater Pointe
205 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0322
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
o Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date Description
15 Full Set of Civil Plans (7sheets), Architectural
Elevations and Landscape Plans(Copies
provided bv others)
15 Application w/required submittal attachments
15 TOR Application w/required attachments
Comments:
Nonhslle
&~ Sf1Wiu4 1vee.
.
C!VIL.
LAND PLANNiNG.
ENViRONMENTAL.
TRANSPORTATION.
July 14, 2003
Southwest Florida Water Management District
7601 U.S. Highway 301 North
Tampa, Florida 33637
Attn: Richard M. Alt, P .E.
Project Name:
Application No.:
County:
Sec/TwplRge:
Brightwater Point
PERMIT INQUIRY
Pinellas
8/29/15
Dear Richard:
We are submitting a permit inquiry for the above referenced project. Client
resources indicate that all existing impervious areas were constructed prior to
1984, and that no SWFWMD permits have been previously issued for this site.
The proposed construction activities consist of the following:
. REMOVAL of 5860 S.F. of existing impervious vehicular use area and
14,992 S.F. of existing building and sidewalk area.
. Construction of2623 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 14,187 S.F. of
building and sidewalk area.
. This will yield a 3237 S.F. REDUCTION of impervious vehicular use area
and a 4042 S.F. REDUCTION of total impervious area.
The project is located in an open basin. Construction ofthis project will not
increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume.
No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the project area. No wetland impacts
will result from construction of this project.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
Wlo
.
.
Re: Brightwater Point
July 14, 2003
Page Two
All appropriate sedimentation/erosion control measures will be implemented
during construction. Since no concentrated flows exist or are proposed, it is likely
that containment of the project area with silt fencing is all that will be necessary.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further questions
or comments regarding this project.
Sincerely,
h
Richard C. Kelley, Engineri g Director
N orthside Engineering Ser ices, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Ste 930
Clearwater, FL. 33755
Nonhsille
&~ s~ 11tt,
.
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
+
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
RECEIVED
FOR:
JUL 1 6 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
BRIGHTWATER POINTE
PROJECT
Lennie M. aeyaert, P .E. #52943
JULY 2003
PROJECT NO. 0322
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATE R, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI NG.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
25,918 SF
20,852 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
5,066 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP B)
92.33
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.76
T.O.C. =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
.
.
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
0322
25,918 SF =
20,852 SF =
o SF =
5,066 SF =
0.59 ACRES
0.48 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.12 ACRES
98
100
69
25,918 SF
20,852 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
5,066 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
25,918 SF =
16,142 SF =
668 SF =
9,108 SF =
0.59 ACRES
0.37 ACRES
0.02 ACRES
0.21 ACRES
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 25,918 SF
IMP. AREA= 16,142 SF OF IMP. AREA@ CN = 98
POND AREA= 668 SF OF POND AREA @ CN = 100
PERV. AREA= 9,108 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN = 69
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP B)
CN = 87.86
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.66
T.O.C. =
25,918 SF
16,142 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
668 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
9,108 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
.
.
PROJECT NAME:
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
PROJECT NO.:
0322
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA:
BOTTOM EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
5.10 1,770 0.041 2,350
4.60 1 ,495 0.034 1,581
4.30 1,329 0.031 1,176
4.17 1,258 0.029 1,015
3.96 1,140 0.026 766
3.74 1,022 0.023 539
3.53 904 0.021 336
3.31 786 0.018 156
3.10 668 0.015 0
T .O.B. EL.=
D.H.W. EL.=
W.Q. EL.=
TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
25,918 SF
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.50 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
1,080 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
4.30 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
1,176 CF
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,PRE
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.59 ac.
SCS Curve Number 92.33
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
2-
:[
tl::
o
C
::l
~ 1
o
o
HYDROGRAPH: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,PRE
2
4
6
Qpeak: 2.3813 cfs
8
10 12 14
Time (hrs)
Time of peak: 12.1 hrs
16
18
20
Vtotal: 17.257 fP
22
-
.
24
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,2SYR,24HR,POST
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.59 ac.
SCS Curve Number 87.86
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
2-
$'
~
l:l::
o
c:
& 1
o
o
HYDROGRAPH: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
e
e
2
4
6
8
10 12 14"
Time (hrs)
Time of peak: 12.1 hrs
16
18
22
24
20
Qpeak: 2.2826 cfs
Vtotal: 16,095 fP
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area 668.00 ft2
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 1,581.00 ft3
Pond Length to Width Ratio (LjW) 3.00
Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base 0.00 ft
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 1.30 ft
Elevation of Starting Water Level 3.10 ft
Elevation of Pond Bottom 3.10 ft
Is there overflow ? y
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.10
Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 0.01 ftjd
Factor of Safety 2.00
Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 0.01 ftjd
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.20
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of PondjExfiltration Trench 1.00
Time Increment During Storm Event 1.00 hrs
Time Increment After Storm Event 6.00 hrs
Total Number of Increments After Storm Event 6.00
Runoff Hydrograph File Name: 322POST.SCS
Time of Peak Runoff: 12.12 hrs
Rate of Peak Runoff: 2.28 cfs
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left Right
Groundwater Control Features - Y IN N N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Impervious Barrier - Y IN I N N N N 0.00 I
Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00
.
.
MODRET
ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,2SYR,24HR,POST
Structure Type: BROAD CRESTED
Crest Elevation 4.30 ft
Crest Length 2.60 ft
Coefficient of Discharge 3.31
Weir Flow Exponent 1.50
Number of Contractions 0.00
Design High Water Level Elevation 4.60 ft
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,2SYR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
00.00 - 2.44 1.300 0.000 *
0.00000
2.44 1.300 0.00002
0.00001
3.44 3.110 0.00001 0.00
0.00001
4.44 3.158 0.00001 0.00
0.00001
5.44 3.255 0.00001 0.00
0.00001
6.44 3.396 0.00001 0.00
0.00002
7.44 3.595 0.00002 0.00
0.00002
8.48 3.879 0.00002 0.00
0.00002
9.48 4.253 0.00011 0.00
0.00020
10.48 4.359 0.00040 438.74
0.00060
11. 48 4.397 0.00024 1 379.60
-0.00013
12.48 4.611 0.00028 6 762.00
0.00069
13 .48 4.521 0.00077 9986.60
0.00085
14.48 4.408 0.00098 11,096.00
0.00112
15.48 4.378 0.00092 11,780.00
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
0.00072
16.48 4.366 -0.00025 12,308.00
-0.00121
17.48 4.360 -0.00040 12,759.00
0.00041
18.48 4.353 0.00037 13,141.00
0.00034
19.48 4.349 -0.00019 13.479.00
-0.00072
20.48 4.347 -0.00003 13.797.00
0.00067
21.48 4.342 0.00073 14067.00
0.00079
22.48 4.341 0.00001 14327.00
-0.00077
23.48 4.340 -0.00023 14,577.00
0.00031
24.48 4.332 0.00020 14,762.00
0.00008
25.48 4.310 0.00007 14.805.00
0.00002
31.48 4.300 0.00002 14,815.00
0.00002
37.48 4.300 0.00001 14815.00
0.00001
43.48 4.300 0.00001 14 815.00
0.00001
49.48 4.300 0.00001 14815.00
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
0.00001
55.48 4.299 0.00001 14815.00
0.00001
61. 48 4.299 14815.00
1't";;r;:"6 'c?J",f" O;l./-1i"Jo.>1::- (j,./ j[1"'/~'J(,/'515)
Maximum Water Elevation: 4.611 feet @ 12.48 hours Recovery @ > 61.480 hours
* Time increment when there is no runoff
WARNING Maximum Infiltration Rate: 0.092 ftjday Exceeds Vertical Permeability: 0.005 ftjday
4.5-
g
c 4
o
:;::::;
CI:l
>
a>
W
L-
a>
......
CI:l
:5:
3.5
L
INFILTRATION: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
5
10
15
20 25 30 35 40
Time (hrs)
Max Water Elevation = 4.61 ft
50
55
60
45
.. " , y'
.
e
.
.
.
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
PROJECT NO.:
0322
VOLUME PROVIDED = 1.176 C.F.
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.30 POND AREA (SF) =
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 3.10 POND AREA (SF) =
UNDERDRAlN INVERT ELEV. = 2.10
COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT/MIN
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 22 FT
SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH
1,329 S.F.
668 S.F.
. ,
ELEV. AVG.HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. IL TER AREJ FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME
FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN.
4.30 1,329
1.80 0.30 2.75 0.65 35 2.03 374 184
4.00 1,164
1.50 0.30 2.75 0.55 35 1.70 324 191
3.70 999
1.20 0.30 2.75 0.44 35 1.36 274 202
3.40 833
0.90 0.30 2.75 0.33 35 1.02 225 221
3.10 668
TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME =
1,197
C.F.
TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME =
13.3
HOURS
Sent By: ~OATHSIDE ENGINEERING SER4IIfSj
J This Warranty Deed
7274468036 ;
06 Jun 03~06AM;JOb 531jpage 2/4
Macj~ Ihi~ 4th day uf January A. O. 2002
by Robert (Jor1llan. Bucc...or Tru.t... of the
Alfred P Prentice Trust dated OB/21/95
bereillllher CAII~ Ihe II ilI'llur. 10
Larry J Miller and S.rb.re 8 Miller,
buaheAd. and wife
J.~))
r~'" \-
WllOiC posr o(fi~ address 1&:
10 I..t Loch Lloyd Parkway
aeltoa, NO '4012
Grant.... Tax lel .
hen.'ll1ilflcr ulled Ihe 1I'a.llR!\':
IWllttlc.U ~lICIl\il"U ,'''' 'CmI .Jranl.... ~ 'C,.,Utt' 11lC1\ll.k a11111c ""1... ,.. III.. in'lIIIlIlC'" IIIIIIIlc
1w..,.ItJ.' ~"~lIClIIIlIn. .1'Il "~ll'" flf iIId",lduah. aMi,,,,, wtct.",.. uclll.",... ul <""""""tjc\a"
Wituesseth, Ulat (lie ,'lAIor. for and in l:OMider,uiun Illlhe IUIn M S 10. DO
and ol~' ..lIIl1able cOMidetation., ~.. wltcl'COf II Mfthy JCt.Dowlcdltd. herehy 1'lInts. _pins. leUs, alien.\, 'etluses.
relu.~. c.on"ey, and corafimtS unu,'l lhe iiaAl~, all lbll cenail\ liIlId ,illalC In Pinella.
County, Fkllide. I/Il:
LDt ~'. Bay.ide Subdivi.ion No. ~, according to the plat th..~eof
recorded in ~l.t Book 27, Page 32 and 33. Public Recorda of
Pine11.. CQunty, Flo~ida.
'~SUBJ&CT TO Cov~.n~.. re.~rio~lon., ......nt. of record. and tax.. ~or
the currtmt y.ar.
ClZ-Q06gge _JAr.- 4we-u.:Ji 4 ~4f'''
? 1~Ir.l.I..A;; r:o Ell( 11769 fOl(l ~)94
!....I......lall
. ..
.
Said p~ope~ty 1. not th. haae.t..d of the Graneor(e) under the law.
aDd cOD.titutton ot tbe State of Plorid. in that neither G~aato~(8)
or any ...bere of the bou..bold of Grantor(.) re.lde thereon.
f a? P.rcel IdentificatiDD Nuaberl 8/29/15/04932/000/027D
---=2._!OIflhu wlllt all lilt ItllelJlmll. Mrediranttnl5 and appunmances lheftl'" ~llIIIllItJ or ill lftY"'i5C appeltainiDI.
. _._~-o Ha"c and 10 Itold. IIlc hIIlC In fee simplt torcvcr.
And die' IUlIllOr llcrcby co\lellallr~ witll said ,ranlCe lbat Ihe srilDlOI i51IwtUUyaei,M! ()f said IIftII ill fr:c silftple;
lb. 1M sranlor hu pod rilltl and lawful eulhvlll)' 10 xli and C:OIlYfy Mid Janel: IIw 1M &,..or hereby fully wan"nls
me rille to said lend .. WIll defend lhe iaIlle aM.iwI the lawful cl!liRls of .u pr:rlOftl *ho~ver; IIld lbaa laid lalld is
free or * Cl1l."\IIIltlriUJllCS U"" WC$ ItCnlilll lubKqumt 1.0 Decf.mbrr )1, ~OOl
In Witness Wbertor. the Slid gr.1ll(or. II'" II&aed and scaled thnc presenls ,he day and year lirst allow
..
A--
_"MD.
.. ~~_...
I ....-.....- . , .
.,\ .---..... acfoT.~~...'''l-l~
~ti. J: obert rDlan. SuCCI.. r
Truet.. of tbe ~lfred P
Prentice Trust .~
"'" . ~nl
.....
-
fV~ . ~"'n
r.:;l
-
...- .. ~.
r;:u
Sl.ll~ l)' rlor14e.
COU,II)' of Pinel 1..
Tb4! rOl'flfJlnl inUfUmtftI IItU .lCkoow~JClI bclore IIIC Ihill 4 th llay or January
ZOU, \'Iy
RObert Garman, Buee..or Tru.t.. af the Alfr.d P Prentloe Trust dated
08/31/95
wh<t is pmonaIly know" l(I IIW' Of wbo II. p~ccl I1'hoto 'II) as idmtifrc:lllon.
..............._~........_-....._~-
~--..') ~
-~. ~
Nutlu:y l....btic
I'tild HaM;.;..... _... ..
u.. .....__,....... "u._...C
~.~ RO~"M^HV MlRFlJIlU
-!-W... ~n i t'~.~K.:,lCjllr.."I"I..I..'
"...."'" 1 \""1.\ ...nfH..,~.)I.
J_,)flrtttINl~ '''.........."...9 .,.
,;~e~t. ~"!'. THSIDE ENGINEERING SE.S; 727';./:36;
:.;~ ~ ..' , . "
:~\", RC1Im 10:, . .
.,:\ ,. ( 0 Mult. nawAIIT'I11tI:oi'<:1.&AR'U11l1t.INC.
;i;..:.'..... ,II .1 ~'). Add~:I1!'-<:-'... .
1 ~ . .~. ......Jm6
f. O. nit 1_.. ~ bv.JilNNrPER PITRUZZELLO
").,,) ,
w' . mw~ CWCLMlI.WA1'U.1Ia;.
. ._~........_.._..- '.,'.
~.""")J7.
... --.". ~... ID lIII:.~ " cond....
~... iIl.lil"- ~----'nI ~ b11l.
, ~ ADpnlJm I'In:aI w...inc.lilJa (Fa1lC.) kuiMelfl):
..___~ 'OR 12'/lS!OU,:>./no01CU,i,O..._.nn
~. .~)t.s~)!""'"'' ." .
.. .~~~~rLF: NO: OOOSOQ20l .
:;: ~;3SM:-Q WAR~.DEED
'ii.,. tt.:. ''''''-'-' .........-...._._.....-.......'""".~--I
~;! .F~~
"., ..... . 'TIll. Werre., Den "'d illl 2nd ~,l'f. Jun" .A.D. 2000.1ly
~~~ ..... .." 'RAYMOND E.. RJIlNS ..n~ MMY C:. RHI,N8. bU8b.iind ilnd wife .
~~~ -~3' ~.;~ /. -:.,...._~~.
".... .JO'A~ ~ I. .... ..,81 ..11II ii,
~;~. Q( ~~. ~ ~ dlt .!-.... .... ....!I'IiI:a.... If' .
AN . '_' 1:''': .
.o""tJAtlRlaCC'i'::' "-:-:-MILLBR. and Wi"m! S',-1iI1ait..-1iR-:-bu.bilnd ilnd"wi fe'" ..:-_..,.-
:{
\D
'"
....
~
r:
.S
!-
t;;
~
9
....
oJ
F-1
~
. .'
~:'
..,,'
"
....
o
.:
I
~
....
foI
I
.~
~
.00;
i
, a'
Clll
,<
06 Jun 03e07AM;JOb
..
00-',..,.. .JIJH.. '-lOCO !L""'"
~LfIl' CD II'!~'" It.'
,........
. .,
. 6
wi.-,.,.......: ~ foe. ~d Jf~',~--~,-
. ~. m{)G;4oi~-'
. I '. .
hr:om..., ftIIklol*.-. . ...... ..... .
WITNISSKTH: , 1111I.... ,._. iii( ... ill co.l*m1orl Of.... _ '" SIO.OO Oft...... .... ...,." v..... ~..Io"'.
rm:. WMreot.lIINtl, ............ ...etly ".10. ....... xlii. .11I. ....... .......-.... ~ _ lilt
".IIIft'. .1... ~ Iull_" .. ~i nell a. . C'~lIty. ~. vIa::'
.'._._'~'.
Lot. '28';-UYSIDE~OJmIVu.iok' NO:. 2, acco"dinq. to the' Plat'
. thereof. .s .recoxded In..P!.~ Bonk 2'7,. pagea 32 and.'H.' Ot. tJ~e'
P\lblic 'R~cord. . of P1neUilB County. *lo~i eta.
. .
Toe~ther ~th, ~t. '-'ithouL _rranty, riput., rights, if eny, :lPIlUttehant
thereto. .
-J
(
. .
Jtl.Srf,' i ... rmc rF aUT .
PJIUM aum. FUll..
-..' I .... .
~. ~ lB:$O:<<1' WI
~ .IOHIIK ..
-- .
!:.... . 11(: . R:
-..- . l'
.. sr.,- -wm: "3
. TaT...
fjlOllX .~:
. r8UfV tJa
. . .
. .t", '
. .' fflj;
, 110.50
13.511,1>>.
----
65.lD,!iD
t3,510.~
'.00
.~.'
..,.
.
'..
531;page 3/4
~.:.:~::~?i
L"" .'
,.....:.1:....::.:;.;,
!r~'?'.' .~~ ~-::...~
~::,~f'0t
.,-~. - :~.~
..... .
,', ,"
~~. .... #" :,"
.~..~- ~4. t~~'~
.~! .. :. .
" :..,,1,.
. :.........;..
',.;::Zj
,i~;~:::$;#
l',:':;'~'t
-
r";;i'':-J<l''
i~~
:.'..~~~:#-
~~j~
,."..;J.....
. .\V,,!:"II:;1o
,.
. .
--
Ii
.-
.
t
6. . ,.
i
I
"
t
...... "
fjl:: ~ .
: ~...
; a
~..
t
o~ ~~n ~3~07AM;JO~. 531jPage.4/4 .
... ,. ,. ~
016115 'SGE 6 Z 8
B~; .NORTH~IDE ENGINEERI~G. SE.Sj . 727446~036j
.' _'. w."1UI~/'(n J)Qp \~'''''rF ~:-:--. BS2 417f~'7
- ~qi~~.3J~b,tt1t~r~,
............... "''''ID, ..... _ ":::.~. _II _I'" 0;. 1IlII.... ~ ........--.:
=-:::.::-~ ~t" ~ I=, ..",.. :~.=' =:-.:: __~ :=
.. ....n. .
Sent
..
..' ....
!Ill
....
'"'
. "
...
Nov~mber
'If . A. D. li8S
1/
o day 01
.
Ma4. th1a . 15th
ta,m,,,n
o ZB1GNIEW SOIAT7. and S'Il:"FNU^ solltrz. his wife
01 the eout, oJ Pinellas .. UIie.S......., '.' Florida
,art, of tile rlnt put. 1IIid. .'
J..AUIlf1a J. MILlJ;1t.and RAiuwlA. S. 'MILLER. his wife
)ihose maiHnc address is: 103,09,'1.eo. Boulevard = Leawooo
01 tIMI ~ 01 .John's~n '. ;. ill....... 01 Kansa6 . 66206
~ of tbe ... put, c.
.....d1t thet... NkI putJ ", ..,... fln& pdt. for .... 11 co~ 01 tile ....
., Tu doUIn ad UIIRIr~"" .................. ~. ... .. aJ.f.,fUI-... fllii'~ ....", tM
..... put. u. NC:Idpl wbeNot II ..,.." .bow......... ..... ..... ~ ..1014. to tM
....putr. or ......MeII/IIl..,.n .... .... ... ......,......r. .. 'foUowiN deled... 1IJId. ......
.., Ud lNl-. .. &be Coual, of . Pinellas- . ... .af ~ to wit:
~..- . .. .
~. ... t-} .....'.. '
. . ..... .01- .' .
.. '__'" .. _ Lar ~-NINE (29). &AYSIDE SUBDIVISION N:I. .2... .' . .
,~ ..-... "'( ~--...._~,_....__._.,.....,_..- ,. ''t. ...._..'":-..k~~_..._.,,-:.. .....~.~-_.~ -------.---........
: accotdi. t~ Map. or Pbt "thercof-,.g rccordc4 in.. . .
':' . ... .. ' .. 0" . ."~.'
P1at Book 27. P~es 32. and. 33; 'Public Reco,1'<b of
. . . .' .' .....
Pi11$1189- Q,unty, . Flori.da.' . ';.' ~. .
. ..
" .
.1
..
.... .' .
~~".:~~-;::=
. .'
'.
'. .
, .
,., '
,.'
-14' 14TsnU 12
. lit .
. .
. ,41 .
~TOT"
. '.\
. : .,.. '"'7-
.... ,
.1 .
..
. ~
.
..
I!_ 01 ~.itl1' thO. .". ," '. .
., 40~' .,t.o 0 . ~'I .,. .. , ft,...
.., os .i _:t~:.l".o I) Dli..~_. "iii M. r.A,....,~I'My.......
43 I"t ~ ... 0 ... .. ..~.. ":.. . -.. lII't"I"" T. , .
~~. ... Pi...... ~ . . "';
-YJ.33,0,~ ...at..' .:.. ... ~ 'CIJ:": .~. ..-
. N' ':', ,..' .,.'". .: '. ......
\- ,.., , . .
nii~"~e is 1Ia4e.,sub1Kt'to resiric~i~J J'e5eTVation!l an4 'eRS_t~' .
recorilj Ind also subject to taXes. .for'the 'year 1935'and p~t y~. ..'.-
""" .. .. .... t t".' . '.;. .. . ," . . . '
... '.. _ ...A, '
_ 1M .. "'"' of toW _.... dea ....., fun, ..-t U. UtIII.to laid ~. ... wD.1 cWepd , ·
.tIIe _' ~tbe""" c"- &r all ..~ ......_u...". .' " '. .:
-.. \ . . . . , . " . ;. ,..' . . ",
: ....'" ..... .~. !be ... ""'-61' tile tint pa.rt ... ~o.. .... ~. ~ .
. ....... oW....,........~. .' .' .' . .', ' .....: ~
., '~ j.',' ......... ~ '.. "..
:.... . ....,. ~~~!~ ...p. ,~
., ~ ,..,. . t...~..:.....--,.:...:J .. .. . . . . '. ,. . ~
, .. ' .
_ '.-' V
,_::-;-r'l~' .
-4
. ....
. .
. .
.
. .
".
"
"
0.4.
il.
I
L
"
.'~,'j~-. ::;:'.: . !;.....~.-.;
..'
& ". 't.
.'
'.
-, '''~--... .'5 .4 56 ~.~ .~, .'
STA"OP ,..,R.ORIDA .... .' }'" , '..
COUNTY C#PlNE1J.AS' ' . . .....
, . ~ . '. .
.. ". '.' ~
. "_~gg. c~ T.lJat oD. tWa day ~ull1 *IPHftd bdoft lilt, .. OUJcer lIUJ1.
~tlWJtM 10 ...,.....w,v Dalla ""'.1 at"I....... .. ooi' , '. .
____._~.. _.w..._ .~... "..,..,............. ~,.",&..~. "-.;,. ... 1ft
. ....
.....
.'
. .
*
'.
~"M
. ...:.
1.. · .
A\. ,.... . .
". t::' ,.;:.....
I ..'.. ....~. I
~ .;.... . . .;. '. "..
. t '. '.; ,':',/
.' r\'.:. '. .:....
I' ..-:, '.
'r" . ,..::,.
. . r.: . .,;;.1;.... .~. .,'
l. . . "
1, . .' .
. j: . .'. .
'~t:. ',' '. ".~ .
. J. .'
il . ". . " '.
" ..... . ".
.....:~.~..." ':.' .~.,
.~ .. ' .'
.' It..'.. .~.
~. . it
l' '.
. ~:. ,'. -f'..... . ..
~..;i;.
.. .(' , .~..
.. ..\ . .,
. ..... '. oS
a .'.... ...
i ' ;;. ..'
~ ~:.".;- ~",l' ';.
. .',J"
.i.:F ','.'-
...,;. "?:,;.
. .
"
.. .'
.
'-- .....':'"
.. .'. ...
Nonhside
&~ Sewie& 11tt,
.
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANNING ·
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL RECEIVED
JUL 16 2003
Date:
July 15, 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
To: City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Flortda33756
Attn: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: FLD2003-06027 & TDR2003-06003 - Brightwater Pointe
205 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0322
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
o Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date Description
13 Full Set of Civil Plans (7sheets), Architectural
Elevations and Landscape Plans(Copies
provided bvothers)
13 ORC Application w/required submittal
attachments
13 TOR Application w/required attachments
Comments: The application fee of $1 ,205.00 was previously paid at original
submittal. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you
have any further questions or comments reqardinq this proiect.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
OR',' .-..
G //" '1L
I'VIi
FLD2003-06027
205 BRIGHTWATERDR
Date Received: 7/17/2003
BRIGHTW ATER POINTE
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
RECEIVED
JUL 1 6 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
.
.
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIE~II
NOR U
SOU H: --
WEST:
EAST:
,:, Clearwater
~~
"<;;;"'::,,....,:./~~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
'1\) -, I) "nn3
" L. J () I .j
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) PLANN1 D:'::PARTMENT
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATfON: SLEAR'V/>TER
Residential Infill Project (Revised 11/05/02)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME ~C0~~)~~ ~\m~ ~~ ffi+n~frl-~
MAILING ADDRESS JlQ. l~'}.. JOJ{ O~~
PHONE NUMBER: ~~~ !-~~1fg~~1 C Q.. FAX NUMBER: '7 ff1 ~ d9 ?)~
PROPERTY OWNER(S): ~(rL{ J. rn l\ \-e i"". C^ \'d ~_~c;.... s, m; \ \ e< J Lc.l ~ ("'(' nC e
\ rV\' i\Must indllde ALL owne~ ' /
t...hJ' \\ \ \e,. o.~ ~'S~\C._-:5"\ \ \ 1\\(<'
AGENT NAME: t\~\\.}'Sk G'\YJ\)CH'>e .. ) ~\'\-n:)lc\€' ~ $" x~ flP€'tjf'\Q ~ h~(":QS
MAILING ADDRESS: lo6 \ Q \ -{( \.;(:tc. ~ -::5\ \r.e\-)::#:~1'~O /' JOL),i11.n1<<"/ y::\) ~?:> 75 S
PHONE NUMBER: '1 ~/ r- Lv-r~ ' d-~lD9 FAX NUMBER: 1 d-I- 4l\lo~<303 &,
CELL NUMBER: ') 8--, - Tl09 -oCt 43 E-MAIL ADDRESS:
STREET ADDRESS:
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
pOS ~\l'q \-\t-wo.xe __ ~~ \1'-e .j
\. ..
\-..0\5 Q..l/~~ 4-89), ~"6\o.e Su'o. ~.d-
~i6/0Ljq09-.1cco16J-~; O"d5?O ~ O~40
I I
. SC15 C\.C' \('5 d-5 q tB' ~a - fl--h
(acres, square feet) ) I c..
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): .f2 \ ~ . I
B.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
~ \ '\ "k t\ f1'l
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): e., e..:x. ~l )1
(include all requested code deviations; e,g, reduction In required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Residentiallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.(T~), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ~ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
Q SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Q Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmon with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located. n II
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. 5e.p _ q ~; \0,1- 1\ fl't
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. L::" c: . \.- f \ _ ".1- 1/ lD.-'1
,---2e E'...- ~I \l.'Dq: 4
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5ee~ u\--\lDi~ II fl"
5. The proposed development is consistent with the coml)1unity character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
~.~ 7 )L.Y-\\,b \\- It A-"
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, incl ding visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties. ' 1\ (
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Residentiallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
o
Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail::
1.
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
~eK' ~
7' xhit}~/
2.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
Sze-. 7~brt liftL
3.
The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
~Ce- 4~~\n'(t_nfY'
4.
The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
-See- ~~~~-\- /I fyi
5.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development. 5e..<:..- ~~ b\~11
6.
The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
~-e~ 4\-\,'0+ 1\ er'l
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
:Se~ &~~~) ~-\- II f\{l
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Residentiallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all on site and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y:z X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Residentiallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
G. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color
rendering, if possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Residentiallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive
Plan, Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to
Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ::j; ~ .10 fe
L. SIGNATURE:
~",,'"11 """'I.
~"''''''ta Mn Hq,:!IIIh
~ <:::>~\,J ........ #/~ '..f.:
~ ....~\SSION ii-- %
.::~ . Cj ~.. ~
..~ ~~ .~.. ~
Sig ature of property owner or represe~v~ .. _. 1 * ~
~ 'Z \ #CC863281 : ?J ~
,~. -9i:::
~ ~-.. J; 8onded\XI~ r!P__.(j~
~ ~)-A-/~Y Fajn.lns\)~~_- <.<<.'V ~
~ 1n"........t"..C), ~
'IIIItl:iLIC Si~\~ ~"""
111"",,,",,,,,,,
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sw rn to and subscribed before me this
, A.D,
vl\e
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
descr' ed 'n this application,
AatA."5
APPROVED
erN O. F CL~=:~
TRAF~~~
~~~;i~/~ ,: r9t./ VI1;! (t:1~r>~f;m'Ii~~(I/(~itl! IV'fJ)
I I ~ J.,t.;d.s(I,i- tet(J;""i beC'hI~e
-+ T(~;L (Mfe .,.,'1 ~k Cioc's 1A'~s/AI;i4,,1 IlJovph ""J /~>' /Jt1()1> v~,
dJ;" 1'/4 -l~c"~ 7 'J
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Residentiallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
. .
.
.
"
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we). the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
S:IPlannmg DepartmentlAppllcatlon Formsldevelopment revlewl2002 Formslresidentlal mfill application 2002.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Residentiallnfill Application - City of Clearwater
)ent By: NORTH~I~E ENGINEERING SERVIC~ 7274468036;
U~ Jun U~ IU;UU~M,uVV J'U,' ~~~
.
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with "lrdlSlde
__ SIndCIS. _. to act as an agent for L Itc<'< U\C e :J 'l ~y ~l"'t S.
(Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
j;). /<1 -B. " h'f..JcJ-<ur l~Y-) C leLvV tV,J €,fr '~ tying withln
", I, ) I ' ( roperty Location) r-
jj, n p II a S Co~ntyt State of I- I
1.~Al{@/ul. ~~:,~.\)-:k.J-1l~
{ ( / -.-t-t ~ I - M \ ! \
Slgn~~~~/d:,j'~.- - p~:~~~;~~pe~~e; 1--
Z;~~x:, -br-:_ T~hone Ntie~ - 0 3~ ~
i~' . ,'. ('
L\eGu(~r fY;>~J~ I ~ .' .$37G 7
City/StatelZip Code
." .
.ilL !/ Sf-
Stahl or ~
County of. ,.~(Jj'Rt~
The ro'egoi~ In,trun...ll was ~ mo INs J~ ~ da,
of ~'_' 2~. by. ,,_U,U.l.l~. 8S -- ' . ..
() has produced _-
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
~~~.~
*'~*
er
,. f\EGlNH.D TERM\JlO
MY QOMt.\ISSlON . DD 089169
EXPIRES: I'tbnWj 50 2006
Bonded ThN BudgOlI'otart-
commission #
~Q
,~<l>_~
Notary Public.:
(Signalure)
(SEAL ABOVe) A. ~ 1J..JtG{i)~V l_ 0 (Name of Notary Typed. Pri.)led or Stamped)
Sent By: NOR~~SIDE ENGINEERING SERV~j 7274468036j
05 Jun 03 ~OAM;JOb 516;page 1/1
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for HOU6h Ghovaee with .orlllSlde
ElllllleeringServlCes,loc. to act as an agent for UJ LtreMce. ~ { ~yvkxu/t{ S,
(Property Owner's Name) A./ .
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits ,,/' t/l ( / Ie }----.
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
(;) 09-1.) (' 1'9 ll'f-u) ~ \) r
_ '" . (Property Location)
Pl,tl-t> II C{J ,County, State of J=:. I -
i. J C (Jo,_
(,{.~.;cv.~ -A--..)$~'--
1 Cl.-\,1C~~ f / ~-lfc;7~'" ..........
Signature of Prop~y Owner
r...:...) ~- ". I j" )cJ. 1. iL " L/y 0- 0 3b li
c::2!:-~ I~. ."D.i eYW~t . -"
Address of P erty Owner Telephone Number
C 1~0~t~w.teac1. ~-j357(;'1
City/StatelZip Code
, lying within
, , i I I
L~~U\ce So' ,,{{,litAr-
Print Name of Property Owner
Stat8or~~
County ofet~
~L.~'7 111--
The foregoing inslrurn~nt was ~cknowledge before me I\)is w. ~ day
.' ~U;~ -.'
of 'J'\}1Jt.,_. "1 . bt.~" Jd U JS~ AS -"
o IS l)er::.~~~O has produced -' .....
35 Identific<'1tion and who did (did nol) take a th.
(Signature)
CommIssion #..... ~~
Notary publil:
~~~v.~ A. REGINAI.D TERMUlO
...w * MY COMMISSION . DD 089169
~~ EXPIRES: FebnJary5, 2006
~OF'" _ ThIu Budget Notary SeIvlcos
(SEAL ABOVE) A .eeG'IJ~J> ~.e,.Myl-D (Name of Nolary Typed. Printed or Stamped)
3ent By: NORT~~IDE ENGINEERING SERVI~ 7274468036;
U~ Jun U~ IU;UV~M,yVV J'W"W~V
.
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with ..-
__ SlInICII.... la act as an agent far ~ 'Ie.. ce. :s- '\~Y' b,y"S
(pr~perty ~ner8 Name) _//1 'II" . -
And 10 execute any and all document. relaled ta secunng permlls I ti '.
and approvals for the construction on the property generallY located on the
?-os~)Y' r q k'f ( ./. LJ-CVD jr--- , tying withIn
," \! _ (propertY Location) r--
.x. ,I /1 e I I <{ .s < County, state of j- I -"
(6)dA-LdA.A~ ~'~A~'-
r' ~ <- (,,' / ---"-- L /1<-tr eA c" 3' f\. ; II e4-'
. 'SiQn~tt.ir~ of Pro arty ~~'~~r Print Name of PropertY Owner
,:;2,J.;L.~ ~~l~~' }) f~-t Y TeIep!"~.z.f,.,r<l1 fc_e 5'-, ~
C I" M _,^,,,~J 'Lt' b e6- ,.1, I ~ 1.3 ~ 710 7
City/State/Zip Code
Stat80( ~M
Calmly of. .~!~~
Yh. fOfego;ng '...um.." was od<J1<>WIedgo belO<e mo Ihis _.1,2$ <l8,
UV~""IJ~ U(lu..,<:{L
of (f\J~.._" 20Q3 by ~~_ .uti u 'l!/l-as -- . . ..
o IS personally known to me who has produced -....-
~~.~ A. RE6INALD TERMIJlO
~~... MYCQt.lMISSlONI000891&9 as identiflCQtion and who did (did nol) take an oath.
* it
"l! EXPIRES: ItbNarf 5, ~
"1t",,..V _TlvVIludgotHotOrY-
commission #
Notary Publi(:
(Slgnalure)
(SEAL ABOVe) A- et>>.1 ~ ~~ubQ.... (Name of Notary Typed. Prinled or Stamped)
}
.
.
Exhibit "A" to Residential Infill Application
205 Brightwater Drive - Brightwater Pointe
NES Project # 0322
Description of Request:
To construct a 24 unit, five-story condominium (4 levels of living area above one level of
parking) with reductions to the required north and west side yard setbacks from 10' k 0'
for pavement, reductions to the required front yard setback from 15' to 0' for pavement,
reduction to the required rear yard setback from 15' to 0' for the pool deck and from 15'
to 4' for the pool and from 15' to 5' for the spa. Additionally the applicant is requesting
that vehicles be allowed to back out into the right-of-way.
Written Submittal Requirements
1. The surrounding area is currently undergoing a transition from predominantly
small motel uses to high-end multi-family condominium and townhome uses.
The proposed five-story condominium project will be in harmony with the Beac;:
By Design principals, which call for 2-4 levels of living area above parking.
2. The proposed condominium project will not hinder or discourage redevelopment
of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the intent of the Beach by Design
program for the Small Motel district. With the construction of this high-end
condominium on this cul-de-sac location, and the tropical landscaping proposed,
other surrounding property owners should be inspired to come closer into
compliance with the intent of the Beach by Design program.
3. The proposed 24-unit condominium project will create less of an adverse impact
to users of the area than the more intense surrounding and existing on-site
overnight accommodation uses, as the subject site will be occupied by long-term
residents as opposed to transient tenants. The request to back out into the
Brightwater Drive right-of-way is due to the four proposed visitor parking spaces
up front which will not be occupied on a regular basis. Due to the cul-de-sac
location of the site, it is not anticipated that this back out situation will pose a
hazard to traffic or pedestrians. Retention areas will be constructed at the rear of
the site eliminating runoff onto adjacent sites.
4. This property is located at the end of Brightwater Drive on the cul-de-sac where
there is a minimal amount of traffic. Future traffic congestion will be minimized
with the proposed on-site parking.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the vicinity as it is a residential use.
The character of the immediate vicinity is in a process of transition from more
intense overnight accommodation uses to high-end residential living:
6. The proposed condominium minimizes any adverse affects on adjacent properties,
as the building itself will meet required setbacks. Visually the design of the
building will enhance Brightwater Drive and will be aesthetically pleasing for the
cul-de-sac location. Acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation will not be issues
~.
.
.
as this is not a commercial use and should not generate any more noise or odor
over and above what a single-family residence would.
Residential Infill Project Criteria
1.
In order to take advantage of this particular property's prime location,
deviations to the required rear yard setbacks for the proposed pool and
decking itself is necessary. Additionally, in order to provide adequate on-site
parking, side setback reductions to pavement is being requested. This will
allow for a parking space on each side of the building that will primarily be
utilized by service vehicles. Residents will park below the building itself and
the front parking spaces will solely be utilized for extra visitor spaces. The
extra visitor spaces will not be occupied on a regular basis and will aid in
reducing the number of vehicles parked within the right-of-way.
This project will only help to increase the fair market value of abutting
properties. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing fair market value
of the subject site (Lots 27, 28 and 29 combined) is $1,274,400.00. Upon
completion of improvements, the site is estimated to be worth approximately
$15,840,000.00.
Attached dwellings are permitted uses within the City of Clearwater as well as
the Tourist District.
Surrounding uses include an existing small motel/apartment use and a multi-
family townhome use currently under construction.
With the construction of the proposed 24-unit condominium and the
installation of the proposed landscaping, the subject site and immediate
vicinity will be significantly upgraded.
The proposed design of this condominium project will be a significant
improvement for not only the site itself but also the whole of Brightwater
Drive. This project will also provide a waterside landmark of a magnitude
expected for the redevelopment of the Clearwater Beach area.
Flexibility in regards to the required rear setback is justifiable due to the cul-
de-sac location of the site and the need to design a project with functional
outdoor amenities. The side setback reductions are justifiable due to allowing
pavement necessary to provide ingress and egress to the proposed parking
garage. The requested front yard reduction for occasional visitor parking
spaces and a trash barrel staging area.
2.
4
6.
7.
.
lOvlf.'O llpolf""",
.:;o~;rp@"~J'lo" o;9K-ltQ~, .J<;;G.s:6'-I~Q{~:I>/J Ii!J
I [.,~". ~OI}j01,l ....."'1'(','1 --C1/I1\;I ALlP'N~ -M 3~..
IJS'~~ ~r~'Fvm~\0l~~%'~
.
~[II" I ~'O'''
!~ ;;,'1
11'~ f\ ',:,
\~,I ~'::,
> ,;;' ~I~_ -'_. " ''-.'. , ,,- _' r.: ? ~
0' ~ -~~~",'" -,' '" I~l!;:, I
\L~ "~"" "__ """ .',,"" """ , , (j ~; I /0,
p, ," \l.~F ,".' -- ,- .:- .- .' , , .- ,) ,
OJ
LaL~ V(]QI)"l; 'H0VJ8 lGJ. V_lIV31:J '" i
:;1.\Il:1O lGJ.VlUHOIl:I8 ?l<: 'l' '6lJl '\ow ' '
3J.NIOd ~3J.VMJ.HDI~8 :3 ·
NV1d SNOUV::>J,11::>3dS I
., lnlYJ.30 3dV::>SONY,
~b' ,~ II ~~ ~!?J ~!ij,i li~ 1~!~I!1 ~,
~b~ I ~ II" il ~I ~~. x~ ~!j 19 ! I ~~ tt~~1 ~ a& 2f~
~~! f p~ll h @~! U ~l n~L ~~I~~l !h
R~! l I r .ill I' h ~i ,'I ~ II nJ~ rl~ ~ 11: ~I
H.~! I q H Ii ~ ~ ~l ~ ~~~I ;f!f~!; !II ~ I~e iM!11i1 IIi i~l~
~~~I f ~ I... I ~ ~I ~ h~ 3211~ t ~, ~i~ > '~~d i:i~~ lij ~l ~~
~Il ~ Dill i~ ij ~ ~i t. ~ ! r~p ~h~ ~~ ,
~H ,fij ~~f!lll !~~~II!I .~llql~~~~~~
~ :! ~ lId b ~III ! II II! II ~i!~ r ~t~ 1m ~!,~~~ ~I~ : :!!~ i ~~fi! ~~ JM ~ di~
~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ l~ ~! ! n h ~ ~ ~~
I ;>> I l ill ~ ~* I I
~!~ ~~lll ~~ ~~ j ~I i! I <(,
~ii H~, U h t I ., ~ i
Ihl! In U H ~f ~, II It J, ~;I
~flh~ ~ L_l. ',. :, ~t~ ~i!
~ - ~ lit
.1 - i
. ., <(
_~_wn>. . .l tn i~
J.
~
I
I!
*' I ~~ f
I ft ~}~ I I
r '. {
~ .' ~
~ ~ I
b'>11 I
~m! ,h
~ ilumli
() f~I~~lh~
di~;~~n
- iUI5if~~
>- ;il,III~~
-11(t~h!t
~ ihdwJ
il~l~f~l~
~'~sh ~
tl~h~t~~
JJ tit
~II 1'4'1 3 II! I ~
~J ~ II ~o !;I ~
iil1Jidlnfl ~I
Jij
, ~I
Jfi
H
t------......~---- ~
Ii
j~ ~ I i~f,
~ ~Uih ~~@~
:i~ ~~~;~i ~~I;
jj! ti~'I~~ ~<~~
~i3 iS~~g~ t~~t
lol ~~~~~t ~~I~
">>~ '~!,~f d ~
~t @llf~~ ~< ~
g Iii !11!ill liil~
~ ~II~ il:I~!i ;;;11
~ ~~si 6~t~hr a<~I<
!~iP i~IPil~ i~~'~
~Ii~ li~~~ji f~~;~
!~It !~f~~~1 !!!~I
t
~
~
J .~
1 ~
@ ~ tl
d@~
, ,K DJ. ~
f!?:J. ~OC'
"<.il ~r ~
r~ 3
@f 2
8@ ~
~ ~
!
~
!l
i I I
L H ~Ii
I' . c,
\I).
~i
T ~i
f.('
,_Ci~
- ~:
I..I)!
~f'f.OF ROOf ~
BASE flOOD
ELEvATION 11'.(1'
MEAN SEA
LEVEL
10fJor- ROOF
SlAII
~t:~A':fo'iJ~"",~'
m~~
m~~
j.~~
,"411 ["11-1' I rm -
...\ . .... _LUll
NORTHWE~T. ELEVATl<?/o!. (FRONT)
m
Ii
"(~""Oa
9
o [] 0
D~[] D..~~~
D~[l] D
O~DJ 0
N/{,[Il"'.ICl;O
.....
~
r€~tS:1I -$-... - ~- -- -- --- -- ------ ---~----.... -..--....-....
SOUTHEAST ELEVATION (REAR)
5i:ro:i~c;.o
III; .i >; . JOHN MARSHALL SCOTT
, . AKCHITt:;CT
-
.... :D
(\)
L. (')
C (\)
" :l f-'.
<
(\)
..... (l
-.] ..
0 m
W .....
....
..... '-J
I\) .....
w Ul
~ ....
." III
..
./>0
./>0
1l
~
L.
0
.
3:
Ql
,
lI\
:::r III
1lI ....
..... Ul
..... (0
en m
III
0
0 m
ct III
ct Ul
./>0
:D ,
, v
0 z
:::r 0
:D
-1
I
(Xl CJl
H
..... a
w m
-
(Xl H
I Z
en m
I\) m
W Jl
~ H
Z
(jl
CJl
m
Jl
<
H
0
m
CJl
..
."
. II
I\) III
to
(\)
III
Received: 6/171 3 12:45PM;. 813 968 6234 -> NORTHSIDE~GINEERING SERVICES; Page 3
Jun 17 03 12:34p Jo Marshall Scott Arch. 813"'8-6234 p.3
,
.c~rj
. ~
"
0;;
8~ ~
at... ~
=t~ %.....l
~: ~~
~
~,
S!1i
z
o
~
>
OJ
...J
OJ
!i;
ili
~
o
z:
~
0_
l';~
..m
s.!
~~
"'>
~~
Ell..,"..,
Ell
z
o
~
:>
w
...J
w.
!i;
w
~
...
::;)
o.
.,
~
~~
"'~
1-1-
l-
e::::: (,j
<:..->
~~
-->
.--J ...
~-
'-'"
c~:::
--r;
~t.J
C::ac
~<
Received: 6/171 3 12:45PM; ~ 813 968 6234 -> NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES; Page 4
Jun 17 03 12: 34p Jo~arsha 11 Scott Arch. 813. -6234 p. 4
~
"
t::~
ou
c....>
,;,;,..ro-~ loW
=.....
::::-
-t......-::;
~:
-......
x"
Q<
...
-'
<
u
'"
o
....
~
-
<(
Cl
0:
0
....J
I.J...
{ 0:-
w
~
~
a:
<(
w
....J
()
'::>'" Z r-
.... .. <( Z
z~ ....J
::> o. 0
N a..
a: a..
0 a:
0 w
r-
....J <(
LL
....J ~
<( I-
Q :r:
eJ
0... a:
'" ~
<0" CO
.... ..
zl!l
~~
o
..
Z
::J
Nonhsile
&~it9 Sew.i<<4 1~,
.
+
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
FOR:
BRIGHTWATER POINT
PROJECT
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
RECEIVED
'I" I " 8 """.'3
~. ll\J i n Ii j
.j ',.,} i 1-: ('-' j, 1,.;
PU\NN~l'~G O:::PARTMENT
(T~Y OF r.LEf.i.RVVATER
JUNE 2003
PROJECT NO. 0322
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING,COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING,COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
.
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
.
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
0322
25,918 SF =
20,852 SF =
o SF =
5,066 SF =
0.59 ACRES
0.48 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.12 ACRES
25,918 SF
20,852 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
5,066 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP B)
92.33
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.76
T.O.C. =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
98
100
69
25,918 SF
20,852 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
5,066 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
25,918 SF =
16,142 SF =
668 SF =
9,108 SF =
0.59 ACRES
0.37 ACRES
0.02 ACRES
0.21 ACRES
25,918 SF
16,142 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
668 SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
9,108 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP
87.86
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.66
T.O.C. =
98
100
69
25,918 SF
16,142 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
668 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
9,108 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
.
.
PROJECT NAME:
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
PROJECT NO. :
0322
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA:
BOTTOM EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
5.10 1,770 0.041 2,350
4.60 1 ,495 0.034 1,581
4.30 1,329 0.031 1,176
4.17 1,258 0.029 1,015
3.96 1,140 0.026 766
3.74 1,022 0.023 539
3.53 904 0.021 336
3.31 786 0.018 156
3.10 668 0.015 0
T.O.B. EL.=
D.H.W. EL.=
W.Q. EL.=
TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
25,918 SF
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.50 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
1,080 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
4.30 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
1,176 CF
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,2SYR,24HR,PRE
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.59 ac.
SCS Curve Number 92.33
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
2
~
:!=
o
C
::::J
0::: 1
o
o
,"
HYDROGRAPH : BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,PRE
.
I
2
I
6
e
22
24
18
20
10 12 14
Time (hrs)
Time of peak: 12,1 hrs
4
8
16
Vtotal: 17,257 fP
Qpeak: 2.3813 cfs
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.59 ac.
SCS Curve Number 87.86
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
2
~
~
o
c
&1
o
o
HYDROGRAPH : BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
2
I
4
16
20
22
6
8
10 12 14
Time (hrs)
Time of peak: 12.1 hrs
Vtotal: 16,095 fP
Qpeak: 2.2826 cfs
. I
.
e
24
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area 668.00 ft2
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 1,581.00 ft3
Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) 3.00
Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base 0.00 ft
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 1.30 ft
Elevation of Starting Water Level 3.10 ft
Elevation of Pond Bottom 3.10 ft
Is there overflow? y
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.10
Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 0.01 ft/d
Factor of Safety 2.00
Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 0.01 ft/d
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.20
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench 1.00
Time Increment During Storm Event 1.00 hrs
Time Increment After Storm Event 6.00 hrs
Total Number of Increments After Storm Event 6.00
Runoff Hydrograph File Name: 322POST.SCS
Time of Peak Runoff: 12.12 hrs
Rate of Peak Runoff: 2.28 cfs
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left Right
Groundwater Control Features - Y IN N N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Impervious Barrier - Y IN I N N N N 0.00 I
Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00
.
.
MODRET
ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
Structure Type: BROAD CRESTED
Crest Elevation 4.30 ft
Crest Length 2.60 ft
Coefficient of Discharge 3.31
Weir Flow Exponent 1.50
Number of Contractions 0.00
Design High Water Level Elevation 4.60 ft
"
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
I PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST I
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
00.00 - 2.44 1.300 0.000 *
0.00000
2.44 1.300 0.00002
0.00001
3.44 3.110 0.00001 0.00
0.00001
4.44 3.158 0.00001 0.00
0.00001
5.44 3.255 0.00001 0.00
0.00001
6.44 3.396 0.00001 0.00
0.00002
7.44 3.595 0.00002 0.00
0.00002
8.48 3.879 0.00002 0.00
0.00002
9.48 4.253 0.00011 0.00
0.00020
10 .48 4.359 0.00040 438.74
0.00060
11.48 4.397 0.00024 1,379.60
-0.00013
12.48 4.611 0.00028 6,762.00
0.00069
13 .48 4.521 0.00077 9,986.60
0.00085
14.48 4.408 0.00098 11,096.00
0.00112
15.48 4.378 0.00092 11,780.00
'.
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
I PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST I
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (fP)
0.00072
16.48 4.366 -0.00025 12,308.00
-0.00121
17.48 4.360 -0.00040 12 759.00
0.00041
18.48 4.353 0.00037 13 141.00
0.00034
19.48 4.349 -0.00019 13 479.00
-0.00072
20.48 4.347 -0.00003 13 797.00
0.00067
21.48 4.342 0.00073 14067.00
0.00079
22.48 4.341 0.00001 14,327.00
-0.00077
23.48 4.340 -0.00023 14,577.00
0.00031
24.48 4.332 0.00020 14,762.00
0.00008
25.48 4.310 0.00007 14,805.00
0.00002
31.48 4.300 0.00002 14,815.00
0.00002
37.48 4.300 0.00001 14815.00
0.00001
43.48 4.300 0.00001 14 815.00
0.00001
49.48 4.300 0.00001 14815.00
'.
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
0.00001
55.48 4.299 0.00001 14,815.00
0.00001
61.48 4.299 14,815.00
f:.;t:-~: .c:bND D,I.'_"'1 t-<;"?O ~j,./ lI1Jl}t-/5tS)
Maximum Water Elevation: 4.611 feet @ 12.48 hours Recovery @ > 61.480 hours
* Time increment when there is no runoff
WARNING Maximum Infiltration Rate: 0.092 ftjday Exceeds Vertical Permeability: 0.005 ftjday
~
'-"
c::: 4
o
:;::::;
co
>
Q)
w
....
Q)
-
co
~
" r
INFILTRATION: BRIGHTWATER POINT,0322,25YR,24HR,POST
4.5
.
.
3.5
5
10
15
20 25 30 35 40
Time (hrs)
Max Water Elevation = 4.61 ft
45
50
55
60
.
.
"
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
BRIGHTWATER POINT (PONDS 1 AND 2)
PROJECT NO,:
0322
VOLUME PROVIDED = 1,176 C,F,
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.30 POND AREA (SF) =
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 3.10 POND AREA (SF) =
UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 2.10
COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0,09 FT/MIN
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 22 FT
SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH
1,329 S,F,
668 SF
ELEV. AVG.HEAD INCR HEAD L(AVG) HYD. GRAD. IL TER AREJl FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME
FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN.
4,30 1,329
1,80 0.30 2,75 0,65 35 2,03 374 184
4,00 1,164
1,50 0,30 2,75 0.55 35 1,70 324 191
3,70 999
1,20 0,30 2,75 0.44 35 1,36 274 202
3.40 833
0,90 0,30 2,75 0,33 35 1,02 225 221
3,10 668
TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME =
1,197
C,F,
TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME =
13,3
HOURS
,
This Warranty .ed
.
RECE]\/ED
(
Made this 4th day of January A.D. 2002
by Robert Gorman, Successor Trustee of the
Alfred F Prentice Trust dated 08/21/95
'I '~I ~ 8 'jqr'3'
J' !. '".1.(. . ',l\
',-,.1'4 '<. .r......"-"
hereinafter called the grantor, to
Larry J Miller and Barbara S Miller,
husband and wife
PLA"H\,I' ''"' D'>;:)....",--"..-NT
l'l"i'I!l'..t:. '::f r."...ll\l:t
C!~ (IF r:!E~R\I\Jf.T:=R
whose post office address is:
10 East Loch Lloyd
Belton, MO 64012
Grantees' Tax Id fI
Parkway
,~)
I
,.
hereinafter called the grantee:
IWhenc.er used herein !he lenn 'grantor' and 'granree' melude all the pame~ ru thiS in<rromenr and the
hellS. Iega' represenlanve< and a~signs of indIviduals, and rhe succe<<"rs and as.igll.5 of corporalio",)
Witnesseth, that iIIe grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $ 10. 00
and other valuable considerations, re&ipJ whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants. bargains, sells, aliens, remises,
releases, conveys and confinns unto the grcuuee, all that cenain land situate in Pinellas
County, Florida. viz:
Lot 27, Bayside Subdivision No.2. according to the plat thereof
recorded in Plat Book 27. Page 32 and 33. Public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida.
-~SUBJECT TO Covenants. restrictions, easements of record and taxes for
the current year.
02-006988 JAN- 4-2002 4 54PM
PINELLAS CO BK 11769 PG 2394
: III 11I11 IIEI III IIU Ed 11111111111111
.$-
...
Said property is not the homestead of the Grantor(s) under the laws
and constitution of the State of Florida in that neither Grantor(s)
or any members of the household of Grantor(s) reside thereon.
4? Parcel Identification Number: 8/29/15/04932/000/0270
Together with all the tenements. hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining,
o Have and to Holdf the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;
that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants
'we title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful c1,aims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is .
free of all encumbrances excepl taXes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2001
In Witness Whereof, the said grantor. has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above
..
A--
written.
,.---4
i ~_ d. T- U-,.k. ,,} ....l~iALSI
~ ..., Robert Gorman, Succesfi6;=-'
Trustee of the ~1fred F
prentice Trust , . [ill
Name A hdd<<'u.
N..rrc"
Name .4 "'derus.
u:il
Name'
Name a: ^Udr~s'
[1i]
State of
County of
Florida
Pinellas
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 4 th day of January
2002, by
Robert Gorman, Sucessor Trustee of the Alfred F Prentice Trust dated
08/21/95
who is personally known to me or who has produced Photo ID as identification.
.;-~f~ RO:-'I-.MARY MI::RFO! rt1
~ W. ",i:\ < OMMIs..,,)ICJN..'H~'r~I"'~
~~"f\~.f J '\Ptkl.\, M,,,'h 1(1. ~Ii.,
1~~f<l()fAll' FU.O'",_.~ '"
~Jf:.
N""'Y ,!'ubl~ .. ~
Pnnt Name:
<., ,..,~. :"""~i-?~-:~~'-;<","7;'~..:--~~.~ illH'll~-.-",.,'.---- '._ _~...,oll~.'~~r'\,:H:{:-' ..ri""'.'.
I '.1-..~ ~-- .' - ..-- - tJlO ~- ._~~~
~:f.." '"'" Re~mIO:
'~ ~ ( , Na~:8-mvA.TmuOjrCU:ARWA1D.INC.
~ ,1 . J ,,~'Addm;s: 1}.!'.c-.\ SInet
';'t\ Y ~ 'I .' CIarw1It....JlorIdIo JJ756
~__,.:..., ?-.S 0, TIIislltSlrument ~ by: J~IFER PITRUZZELLO
__ "" srl;W..-r--lll'J,..&or:cr....:w~TD,.1NC..
11711 CaWt.~"~-----'--- .~.
J o.i-Wat.... 'flarfda '33756
.1 III a ~ry incident te dlefultill~of conditio~ - .
J . ConIailled in a tide insurance COII1IIIilmenI issued by..
1 . . .. . .Property.. . . Appra. i.sers. Parte.llden/irlC.ll. tion (Folio) N\IJIlber(s): 00-1 ~7.2 ..JUN- S-2COC !5: '~1
. ____ _OR/7.9/1Sfo4932/0001~.- PiNEL-LRS CD _.It( !.OI~'PO tl4T:::~'-:-;
. fAu. ;r~ranlee(s)S.s.~)J"'-'" .' ..'1............ i:/1f~~~
~..:.:.... ~.'i~~gLE NO' 00050022 W~'>>EED. ~;~.%.~,t
, It.:' . ..--.-mw-.;.-.........-....--.-...................IIlI!W...--.I '
t, 'F~E -- 'This WarraatYDeed Made this 2nd day of June A.D. 2000. by50ft~
~; l:, ~.~.:.RAYMONDE.. RH;INE an~ ~Y 'C. RHINE, huabandand wife ...::.,..:.:.::~.~..;.:;.:.,...~:-.'.,.,.....l...,::;:.:,.','.:_'
rc .roTA35-t~~mual sta~sis: .,~-~ ~~,.. , ..' ., ::'~~\rZ;~
;,i- CK BAL!....~eiJiaftercalll;d the&T'lIlIlDr. whose post otra address is:. .,." " , " - . ':f~:';~t~(
~ ~~~~~ '.'iO~UR~E~J ~..-mLLER~a~dH-BAAIuuijt'-S-;~1u~~hmibarnt-and'~ f~~~-~-:~-,-.;~=.t~;~1:~
:. ...0
~ ~
:d. ('OJ
r M
WI..<~-'-'~~~m~ttr~-~.. -
hereinafter ~11ed: die Ifantce. .. .....' ..' ""--. .
r.f WITNESSETH: . That said Ifudor. lOr and ill consideration of the sum of $lO.OO oORars. and ocher valuable COIISiderations.
_ Fi ~eipc ~hereo( is hereby' ~nciwledied. hereby Irants, bariains.. sells. aliens.' reJJli$es. reIeases.conveys and ~nflnlfs unto !he
ui----.~:.~;:;S";:;:D::~:.N6,. 2, accordi:::~':':l"t . ~~=
.' . ,thereof i as recorded in...Pla~ Book 27, Pages 32 and. 33, of. the
Public 'Rl!cords . of Pinellas.County, LHorida. .
~
f-l'
UJ
~
~
N
..-f
l..
~:
.~
[z.,
0
'.~
S
~
H
E4
~
.~.
~
g
0<:
.'~
, .0.
~
0<:
.
. ",.:.;~~t~6~'*:
t.: ~~.'~~~~-~.J;~~
~~+~~~)~f~
':;"~...~-"~,,, ,-......::.
~. ..... -.....
..~~t:~.: -'~/.~~;:. :
. ..~.;-:,. ., ,,;"
. '"
.. ..._w_____._ ~.
. '
. Together with, but without warranty, riparian rights, ~f any, appurtenant
thereto. .
?
, ,
Jl1itEElf'F.- It llm, tURK (J ~T
PIlfl.l!6.mmv, Fl"Il~
.~. ~2000 18=00:(12' IMI
51 .18-mI1('.. ,...
~
. - II: ... !fli"
~IJlj 001 Pica 'i -
'!XI: ST{ff :. M2.19, 3
"
-1 . .." .""
...~~~:,-::;~:/~.~~~
.' .'.--;':>;"
~.~:. . -
.".. ,-.- ",
i" "_.. "0,
..'".:.....,..-,::.....:-.
:' . :"': ~~~..:'~.
, .
lDTll:
,~.rHlt. . . ,.~. . ,:
. .' lB'Hr:
. JmJJV QfRl(
, '., .. " , .
, EPG:
. $10.50
l3.fm~OO
'13;510.50
13,510.50
1.00
~.'
~:~~:~::..,-,~~$~~
(..'-"".:";~.'"
[::_~>~<~ '\.;'
~::~;~~tw;
'/~'~~;E~]
:C;',:;,;;,:;:~,~i
..1 . ~..~~:
-::1'
,..
..
.~ ,
. . . . ."
. W.~1\RAN.~ DEED (Sta\U\O~ rO~I'~'~ .'s'524179:7
~4-is..1J~b,tuturt .
~ . . Wbe,....r -\Ue4 ~";h.. Ultt' term ~partlt" ahall IJIclade the lleln. pe.-n&l ..~tatlft..
...__.. aDd/or _........ oJ tbe reepeethe partlft Ilere\O; tI>e UM of UJi' .....lar IlWllber
mall IIlelude tile pili"'. and Ule plUral \I>e 1lquJar; tile v..- of aa,. pDder oball IJIclude
aU teBden, .
oi ~ 1J ~ICE' 6 ~ ~
a,
1ii
..... ;
""
~~
. "
...
"
Made this . 15th ' day of Nov~mberll . A. D. 1985
lSebDeen
. ZBIGNIEW SOOTZand STEFANIA SmATZ, his wife
of the ~ty of Pinellas In the "State .of '.' Florida
party of the first part, aDd . ..
LAI.JRENCE J. MILLER .and BARBARA S, MILLER. his wife
. )\'hose mai1ing address is: Hl3..091 Lee. Boulevard = Leawooo
# . .. - ~.
of. thlt County of Johnson -.. . in the State of Kansas. 66206
party of the second part, 0
. Witne--dJr that the said party. of .-the lint part, for ud in consideration of the sum
of Ten dollars met lJther',.lIlllilble constderatloB. to_ him ill IIeBd paid by tM' ..id psrtJ of the..
,eCond part. the receipt wbereoJ 11 hereby acknowledged, hllf graJited. bariained aDd sold. to the
saidpu1.y. of the._HcomLpart.h1I heirs and assigns forever, the'following deseribed land, situate
ljinJand being In the County of _Pinellas - ,~of Florida, to wit:
....-. . ; ..' ...... .
if
*. .
~.,.:.~:;::~
. ..
.. -....t.~ _..11-;(. ..'_
f,'
.. ~'~ .;~ r
WI' nWfY-NlNE (29). BAYSIDE SUBDIVISIONt.(). 2, '.
_.__._____"__."__.~ __.__~. _. ..'...,___.-::...____._....."......,..~---_~n "_, :..__..._._~
. . acco~irig. to~. or Plat thereof "aSl'ecorde9 in
"':' . ~ ....... . .. (1J
Plat Book 27, Pages 32. arid'. 33" 'pUblic Records of
I. .. . -- " .14'1q,1~1~~ 7a : 1. 1
'Pinellas-C~unty, Flori-da.' ". ,. . -' . ~ . :'$." .;
.. "" '. ,41, i,~5 .M " ,-
,a. ct1.caih."11Chg - ~TOTAI. 1..33,8..... ~;~.. ,....
'.~~ * '-3f~~:fJ ~... T,..-.lst3,l,~,V..O . ' l". ;
. 43 Int '. >>- ' .. .. .. . . .... .,' .." .... ,.lnll"llible ,Tax P ... j . .. . .- .t
~'. . '. Kar~. "', ttiMl.. CpUIJ . ': . ..
. '. .. TQl/~~_~~ .,at". ' . <l _' .... f"..':<
Thl~~e is ~ ;,SUblett' to restriCticms.. reservations ~eas~ent~{l!' r "" "
record; ~ al~ ~~ect to taxes.fu~ th~ yea~.1985-and ps~t ye'tif.. . T" ,/,,:.
'. AD4 ~ -.Ed party Of the fb'.\t.part does hereby funi _.-rant the title to said land: ~ Wtl1 defepd ." .. 1'.. ~ '.. '.'
" .the 7e- iQJha\ the la~ elaimi Of ~ perso,s wb,omsoever;. '. :~,~ .. '.. . -,.. i.......
~'. . ~~. n 1Iitne..Ulzu.. the. said ~'~e - first. part b~" ~to' iet h1I~,.~ . .~ '... . .. _ .'i.. . ': .,'., ". '.
..8NIQ1e day and 1eu tift above written. ~.. ;. . . - ".. . . '. ,~ ,'. .
-s;" ,... '.. '. .'~' .... . .~. :.,.. ',' '. ..-..' .. 'i" - '.,
. - eIm.W; fr~. ',7,. .... >: .... .---fl-f.:-' .. t"...~.
.{ ~~rmelJ '/;j<i.hA,. -11- .'.-'
WiN' pI -Elf ~TZ c-- }'" .' ~>
. Y.' " _.:~. I I)'"''"fi''' itt'.''-' .~/'~. '. '.' V~- ; _>'...,:-~t~..
;",... ,..... .J ".': .' .:' ~ .'" '. '.' s; '.. ~. ~W,.t, .' , ..
n' '.' ,- s< F . ~ SOlArz . .' .- .... . -. . . ~
,,1~.4'S6rl\'~' . " . ~. .1'" 4 _ :~~ ;; :'.;
. - :,. . -} . . .' .. "f/'
. .' - - . - '-,"" - " " - .,' "...i-
. .
. :
. .~ ~
. \
~. -'---.J..-_
I .
. '*.
. -. II
.' .
I
_.,
.
".
i
\.
\'
......
~ '.' 'IlL...
. ......
STA'ij:"OF . -'FLORIDA
CO~ OFPlNELlAS
-~
c; :.>
" ::
~~
. .:. '~.~"ibv <!mq ~t 00 tJiis day penonanY appe~ before lIle,~in officer duly
~thorized to administer cams IlrictI ~e ackDo.led~e~ts, ~. _ . '
_. .'
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
FLD2003-06027
205 BRIGHTWATER DR
Date Received: 6/18/2003
BRIGHTW A TER POINTE
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
PAID"'"
:~^'.<. '. ' -, "
~;a ~~~ ~.~
.*/.~
~.l..'l.'
,;'~lj.
~'.~.
1"'.0,",
"ioiinile
I'TJ. " IIlo~r .. <t
~;.., ~ ~ ~.. ".- 'J'" < ...., ""~'''if,'r.'' ~I'\ '.. .,. .,'
11"~'..1' ~ lro1:r ~':1'~ ~r'., Ii .:~. . ':",r: j'~,',!".
~JI':'o:lL',/,J ~,~C"{..J.p ..Af,. r~'\:"V\...~'1 ~t:Sf ....~j ,.,~.l...J.;.,1 :{ t.;f~"'l~!.
C' I ~ .
NORTHSIDE ENG S4IIj
PAGE 01/05
(lVIL-
Lr\ND Pl,\HN1NC .
E ~~ Vir,. r:Jr-J ",\ [I'-.)T/\ I. .
n.,O,./'-1 '5 ~ 0 RT,t>,IKn-J .
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
Time: ~ Page 1 00
FaxNoS{,l...1&.5
Of:
From: Doreen A. Williams, Project Director
Doreen@northsideengineering.com
t NES Project No.:
Please do not hesitate to contact our office should you have any further questions or
comments regarding this project.
601 ('-EVElAND STREE"r. SUITE ~30
CI.F.AR\.y'l.TF.R, FLORI DA H7S.~
"'.1 E SA i)1'1I. I N@M! I" I):;!i R I t-.IG.CO,v\
I\! ESTECH@Ml N Ds!'r~~I\I(,(O"1\
727 . 443 . .2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
(
- __'__TlL
_....'.....00 .. r-'.... "..
lei)
C .....\^ ~
<r{'~" \ ~ ).,
~} ~~ ~~Vi
p c-v\fJ
'1 WN
~f LV( QS
I
I
7274468.
NORTHSIDE ENG 4IIr
09/2~/2005 15:56
mARtH.
ARCH ITECT J?r..tUIltmR.S
TEe l'
DBS I (;lORIUl
DATE: 9/07105
ATTENTION: DR. HOWELL
COMPANY: ROBEL INVESTMENTS
JOB: BRIGHTWATER POINT
RE: PERMITTED CANOPY DRAWINGS
SKETCH:
PAGE OF
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
~~
IQQQ~~~~.QI
~~
f --
-"
//
~-
J
roo,
1..-
._. ,I
] -U I
lJ
"Q"
CANTILEVERED
CANVAS AWNING-
6'-0" PROJECTION
- . . . , . . . . . . . , . . .
...... .... ... .
. .. \, "'" \ I
". ,,,'.'.'.', .'.'.'.....'.'.....'.'....
. ~ ... I .. - .,'.::.::~,' "..::.,. ..'....:.:,:.::.:: ..',.~::.. ....1: ...". '.'.:.':,.,::,,:, ....::..:,.. ..'.: .,'.,",..,.::,:,::.,:,. ..::.:,: .,..:.:..,:,::...i.:..,:.::.:..,:.:.',...:::....:: ,,::, ,,::,: '.':. ..'.. ..',,: ..:'.'~,::.':,: ..L,': ,....:,'-::....:.'..~,. ,::,.".,,: ....,'..
~t<~e~~~i2!i~~0 ......:.../.>>+f<-......
- ;:t .'""'~~~;E=~~;;jj;;$. ...... .
38U F."RLICH RD. SUITE. JIll TAM"A. FLORIDA ~UU4
T&L. (113)811.&222 FAX (IU)U".ezu
PAGE 02/05
09/25,/2005 15:55
IBA
J>.aOl I TECT
7274458.
RCHITECT
PLAlIIllER$
DESr.c:m:RS
NORTHSIDE ENG ~
PAGE 03/05
DATE: 9/07/05
ATTENTION: DR. HOWELL
COMPANY: ROBEL INVESTMENTS
JOB: BRIGHTWATER POINT
RE: PERMITTED CANOPY DRAWINGS
RECESSED CAN LIGHT
b
'"
SKETCH:
PAGE OF
SCALE: 1/8"=1'.0"
0;.
-
/;1"
;-
....
-
>"-:.":. ,': :':::~.:,':'~.. :'w'." :': v~ :.~:~:~_"". :~.. '.'
42* MASONRY WfltJ..l
~
;;,.
. '.' ~"'. ., . .
........111' ......,'..w
~
=r
...
-
.. :.~.~:-;.;~~:' :.~.:.~::.::.>->.:.::~,~~~~~:
. .7t"";"",-'..:-:-
. .. "" .
......... _.
JI~OH
~
..,
CANTILEVERED
AWNING
SUPPORT BRACKET
BEYONO
--~~
,.
en
TEL. ,IU)UI,e222
"AX 1'13IU8-UU
3802 tiHIlLIC" 'RP, 'UnE;' 301 TAMPA. FLORIDA 31024
@
09/2~/2005 15:55
7274458.
NORTHSIDE ENG ~S
PAGE 04/05
IrSIA
ARCHITECT
RC.HrTECT
1;'t.AN1jIZR.9
DESIGNBRS
DATE: 8/31/05
ATTENTION: DR. HOWELL
COMPANY: ROBEL INVESTMENTS
JOB: BRIGHTWATER POINT
RE: FRONT CANOPY ADDITION
SKETCH:
PAGE OF
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
~ E
I
f...
~ V E
~
.'
......
@
J
]
b
_I
N
'- ......\
~c;1QUIPM "'^r-\....
G ON WA ~ \: ... -
BUILD ~-\S' eN"
... .':' ~\ -a-~
. ....::::/::::::::;::::;:: I ~ ~ ~ \>
. .-:.;::::::<>/})))))){ ~ (i)" t- ")
/fij!:llj:f!t:~~!W.!fhITJ.j. L~ \J,~\~" I oS
PHONE LOCATION TO )
ACTIVATE ENTRY svsre
3l1G2 I!'HRLlCM RD. SUITIE' UI TAMPA. I'I.Q'UII.... UU4
T~t... UUltU'U22
I'All (aU"n.e2U
I
09/29/2005 15:55
7274458.
NORTHSIDE ENG ~S
PAGE 05/05
m
.IU'ICllr.Tl!lCT
.I\RCHITf-CT
PIAlGlm~El
DESIG!iE1l:$
DATE: 8/31/05
ATTENTION: DR. HOWELL
COMPANY: ROBEL INVESTMENTS
JOB: BRIGHTWATER POINT
RE: FRONT CANOPY ADDITION
SKETCH:
PAGE OF
SCALE: 1/8"~1'-O"
/"
RECESSED CAN LIGHT
:r
-
....
9
a:l
...:1' .:. ~.~ :':". ~.:.: ~ >:
"~\'''''':'''~~. ....... ............
..' ....'.. '.. '! ..' ."....:;..::.. : ..", .... : .~: ~', .
. '
oil
42" MASONRY WALL
FLASHING
SEE MANSARD DETAil
FOREAVE/ROOANG \
INFORMATION
RECESSED LIGHT . .-
j
....
-
-------..........--
@
Co
ARCH
-'
,.
'"
-.""--------.----....
not EII'U..,(:" 'HI, SUITE I UI TAli"". Fl-OIlIl>>A UU"
TEL. (193)11111..11222
"AX 1'131181-1234
.
C I T Y 0 F
e
CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
June 7, 2005
Mr. John Marshall Scott
3802 Ehrlich Road, Unit 306
Tampa, FL 33624
Re: Development Order - Minor Revision
FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205, 209 & 214 Brightwater Drive
Dear Mr. Scott:
On September 16, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 13 conditions the
above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from
20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), and increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet
(to roof deck) with an additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof
deck for open gazebos), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole use by the property
owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive,
under the provisions of Section 4-1403.
A proposal has been submitted to add a vestibule for two private elevators on the roof to prevent rain
water from penetrating the elevator shaft through the elevator door. These vestibules and the elevators
will have similar architecture and color as the primary building.
In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revision proposed is deemed to be a minor revision
and is approved. This minor revision must now be submitted to the Development Services Department as
an amendment to the building plans under BCP2004-04363 and must be indicated on all appropriate
sheets.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 727-562-
4504.
Sincerely,
~g
Planning Director
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IJnactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater 205 Brightwater Pointe (T) - ApprovedlCopy of
Brightwater 205 Minor Revisions Leller #2 6. 7. 05. doc
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BlI.I.JONSON, VICE-MAYOR
HOYT HAMILTON, COlJNClLMEMBER
*
JOliN DORAN, COlJNCIL\!HlIlER
CARI.EN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIL\!DlIlER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AJ'FIRMATIVE ACTIOCJ EMPI.Oll:R"
Jun 07 05 12:42p
JO~MarShall Scott Arch. 81341t8-6234
p.2
"1rSJ ARC H
I TEe T
Mr. Wayne Wells AICP
Senior Planner III
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave. 33756-5520
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, fl 3758-4748
Re: Brightwater Pointe Condominium
200 Brightwater Dr.
Clearwater, FL 33767
June 7, 2005-
I request a minor modification of the elevator access to the roof from the two
Penthouse unIts.
The modification consists of providing a small vest~bule at the doors to the
roof. The purpose is to prevent rain water from penetrating the elevator shaft
through the elevator door_
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
:::;t?#xt~.
<,,' ,~.
/ -
,'__-John Marshall Scott
j/ Architect
1 B OlE H R lie H R 0 A 0 U NIT - 3 0 6 . TAM P A. F L 3 3 6 2 4 T . L . P H 0 N E (8 I 3 I , 6 . . 6 1 2 2 . FAX (. I 3 I 9 6 . . 6 2 ] .
Jun 07 05 12:42p
JOe Marshall Scott Arch. 813.8-6234
p. 1
FAX TRANSMITTAL
ARCH1TECT
PROJECT l C', ~th.JC<l<f
PG\0.~
PLEASE DELIVER TO THE
ATTENTION OF:
COMPANY
FAX NUMBER
5
6
7
8
FROM
DATE
.;)
IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES LISTED OR FAX IS NOT LEGIBLE,
PLEASE CALL 813-968-6222
COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS
3802 EHRLICH ROAD - SUITE 306 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33624
PHONE: (813) 968-6222 FAX: (813) 968-6234
Ma~ 27 05 10:42a
JO. Marsha 11 Scott
p. 1
jIUU[ MAY 2 7 2~ I L i
N.wJ~mr/IL
~-, .-- ~ ~
ARCHJTECT
I PROJECT 11?F Ie; Eft Wff7L~
Fowls
I
~ PLEASE DELIVER TO THE COMPANY FAX NUMBER
ATTENTION OF:
1 ;11 A~ k PA-fC I?- '7 Cu...J
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
FROM -r 0.1'-1 WAN;tJ8/V
DATE s/ 27 /CO-_.
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL SHEET I
IN THE EVENT YOU 00 NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES LISTED OR FAX IS NOT LEGIBLE,
PLEASE CALL 813-968-6222
COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS
3802 EHRLICH ROAD - SUITE 306 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33624
PHONE: (813) 968-6222 FAX: (813) 968-6234
Ma~ 27 05 10:42a
JO. Marshall Scott Arch. 813 .8-62~4
p.2
i 'v '1j"'-.
i .,-\4 f , t...J
N E ~ rPI ~ ~ fi~LOl)A'" ~i~ ~ 1 ~ ~E
0:
I
I
I
0:
'')!^,
)q:
~
" I
" I
II I
/} ;
~ ~:, :otY'G"
'~ ----~-j'
i~
~._---- '~ j
, <!),
, . ~~:I~ I
" ~', /
;' "1 j' (!>
I II
: ::' X/-
: :..L...e /
~ J..: -
)'/ilV' /'
~ ~~.
//' , - - -I. ~:,"
, I ) ;." -
~:
-
t
.
, l
''i I
i
:to 1-- - -,.1-'-
" / 1\,
~. \
"-\
~:I
," = 0 0 = 0
)(\1 0
I .,1
: ~'I cpCDOO
I,J dJcoo05
,~: 0
:':~' :
I DOOoC,
I
______+_~___.J
~Ma~ 2~lf'O'>(,i ;i~<I.~I.'l'..- ._,:. J. Marsha 11 Scott Arch.
~']I~
i . i1
MAY 2 ) 2fOj ~0:
DEVElOPMENT & !
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES)
CITY OF ClEARWATE'i
;
(
~~
~~
(;: V
r-
~
~ CJ1
-
@ ~ I
--...J
(7 .-.l.
-
,.J:::.
~
813.8-62~4
I
I
I
I _
I
J~--
p.3
~
~
~
I
o
-
-
LSI-21/4"
ItPPt.ov'e:D
~'-'~'_'.-"'_'---_,
s d A 4 '~' # r 30 l::l .:1 0 AIl 0
.,2_1!.Z~~dg~ ~R9U Ol3N
ffi ~~~ l~~ 1m I
U ,lliMill @ m @jj \
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
:J
~
~
v.d
'"
i
~
~I "",',
I.
n
n
\ n
.~ \/
___ i
,,0-.9 "I)-.U
..0-21
,,0',Z1 ,,1)-.Z1
..O.,lI.
..0 ,L I
~ ~
VE2S-S.E1S .40....1:j ++005 t te4s....eW ar
('I)
eEv:Ol 50 L2 ~ew
Li)
.
ll...
~\Jl76D
f?0ev~ jCWefC-
PRIVATE
6~ /~ . ~"',/' ELEVATOR TOWER
_ RED I ORANGE TILE ROOF _, //// '\ '----. / ,/ ,- ".'-....
AS SELECTED 'X/ '\ ,.,.., (' )
V / ... / '\"'- _ ~ 'C;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tl
(T) , ~ \\..1 ~JI t1 U P t1 IJi L<" L/.[/ 5> .....
~ ~ -" <D...... /~ 42" BALUSTRADE
~.- -OPEN~ ~ h ij I == ' l.'\~
Innlnnm!i ~nnnn ~ IllRl!!R1itmiJ .na~~W~n\nnlnl ~e l"'~,
(T) U . ..- . .
; oqlllllll'ICJI~ ITJI ~ aImUm ~! ~I!II;;~~~IIIIfIll~'~__WJi:uJJmunnD!;~
; rn · 1- OJ. lr~~ U" I I' D CD n 1m liD
glllllIlllllllllIi 1111111 iIIrn IIIlIIlIl . mUIllI U IlllIIlIIIil m iIr . . . lililllllill ~ ~
I -
~ I II III II 1 ~ DJi D. I I 111 on: [] In I il I ~ I I D
~ _lllllllllllllllllilllllillJlIlJ i iJITlllIlII iIID W!nmiDr !j , IMnillliU ~ n !Ii
~~~!IIIIII!: L ..~ .DIIIIII[~ ~'QUmIl.1I = [IJiW~' D Il
~ ~ ~-- v 00IDIIm'1 ~. -;;, ... ," JI1 nmmm IlmmD
~~- -------.-- - ' I' '1" ij : I ' t- 42" HIGH ALUMINUM
o ____ ( 42" ALUMINUM PICKET ~ . STUCCO '!, I t- ==~__ J' .' i , I PICKET FENCE
..... \..._~-~~ (0 _~ FINISH 0 _,-- 111111,11111 Ii: rrr ~ c-- STRUCTURAL ~-~
~ .------~-=-==~,j~ , . -" - -" - ~ - ~mnlfm1~II:III~ill Wlr -, COlUMNS:" - - - -", ') - - ~~ '1- "" - --
- '. L --- I
~ ~.,,~~,~~~~_~~~~.,~ __/---- ~~~A,!~O~ ~~'"
:J)
n;J
E
y
.
.
." # U1T.'7I#
.~IQ,.'t.~LoF TlltJr...
\~~ .'\),,J,,,,,....c#/X"_
~!V'" ~"""'.,4"
~~.,.\\L/ ""';. ~ ~
" ~_. ',. ~ ~
..C"':I.. ~.=oc. -,~oo;'('lI
r::- --'C-
"'i1"~ .=c-c___ ~..
':.~-:._~-~~c.'::_ I" ~\~
~j'~'~;;;~,"~~l
"'##)4TE~" I'.
-".I'"
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REviEW
October 27,2004
Roland Rogers
Rogers Beach Development
200 Brightwater Drive, Unit 2
Clearwater, FL 33767
Re: BCP2004-04363, 205 Brightwater Drive, Brightwater Pointe
Dear Mr. Rogers:
A condition on the approval of Case Nos. FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 for the construction of 20
attached dwelling units (condominiums) was the following:
'That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold
from 130 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of
any permits for this project. The special warranty deed also must contain a covenant restricting in
perpetuity the use of 130 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of development rights."
This same comment has been included under Planning's review of BCP2004-04363. This must be
accomplished prior to Planning's sign-off on the issuance of the building permit. You were reminded of
such with the issuance of the foundation only permit (BCP2004-05069). I have suggested to you that the
special warranty deed be submitted to the Planning Department for review prior to recording, to ensure
that the language on the deed was in compliance with Code provisions. Our review may include review
of the submitted document by our Legal Department. To date, no such draft warranty deed has been
submitted for review.
The purpose of this letter is to remind you of the requirements of the condition of approval contained in
the Development Order for Case Nos. FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003. Building Permit BCP2004-
04363 will not be issued until compliance with the above condition is achieved.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
~~I1t1;};J~
Plannl:r hi we
S:IPlanning DepartmenllC D BIFLEX\/nnClive or Finished ApplicalionslBrighlwnler 205 Brighlwnler Poinle (T) - ApprovedlLeller /0 R. Rogers
re TDR condilion 10.27.04.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COM~1ISS10NER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.I.JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
d'I':Lrl~
~9 ~~M.OF rl(ZJ~
C~9/1W~i'~
c~t)//~\ ~~
~~t(\~~~.
"".r:::::=-' -,~
':.~ :;::~
~~~~,~~
~~ATE~,~ _.'
~_~1tlt
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
February 24, 2004
Ms. Debra Harris
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205,209 & 214 Brightwater Drive
Dear Ms. Harris:
On September 16, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 13 conditions the
above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west)
setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from
20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), and increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet
(to roof deck) with an additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof
deck for open gazebos), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole use by the property
owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive,
under the provisions of Section 4-1403.
A proposal has been submitted to add a pump house at the southwest comer of the proposed building,
located above the retention pond with supporting columns. The required setbacks for the primary
building (10 feet side [west] and 18 feet rear) will be maintained. This pump house will have similar
architecture and color as the primary building. Additionally, the windows above this pump house will be
eliminated due to structural requirements of the building design. These windows will be similarly
eliminated on the north side of the building.
In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be minor revisions
and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when
submitting for building permits.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 727-562-
4504.
~U2
s . Fierc
ssistant Planning Director
\IMS5c\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXllnactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater 205 Brightwater Pointe (1)-
Approved\Brightwater 205 Minor Revisions Leiter 2. 24. 04. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HM1ILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Debra Harris [debra@northsideengineering.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11 :25 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Brightwater Pointe
Wayne,
I have called the architect regarding the elevation given to you for the proposed pump room. The missing
windows that you pointed out have in deed been eliminated on both sides of the building as those have turned out
to be sheer walls and cannot have windows. Please let me know as soon as possible what Staff's decision is on
this one.
Thanks,
Debra Harris
1/2012004
.
.
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11 :50 AM
To: 'Debra Harris'
Subject: RE: Brightwater Pointe
Debra -
I have received the proposed revision. Understanding the need for the pump room and its proposed location, the
question is how will it be handled architecturally. Looking at the northwest elevation (Sheet A6), and
understanding that the FFE of the pump room has to be at BFE, how is it going to look and what does it do to the
windows and french doors/balcony at that location?? Can the architect provide a proposed elevation with the
revision shown?
Wayne
-----Orig i na I Message-----
From: Debra Harris [mailto:debra@northsideengineering.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 10:18 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Brightwater Pointe
Wayne,
This is just a courtesy "heads up" for you. I will be dropping off a proposed revision to the Brightwater
Pointe site plan for your consideration. This is a change brought about by the architect as a result of
needing additional area for a pump room. Once you receive this proposal please take it to your next "staff"
meeting for discussion. We don't want to go back to CDB but according to the architect there are no other
options for pump room location.
Sincerely,
Debra Harris
1/912004
Norlhside
&~ s~ 1~,
.
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANNING ·
ENVI RON MENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
January 9, 2004
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Attention:
Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: Brightwater Pointe - FLD2003-06027 - 205 Brightwater Drive
NES Project #0322
Dear Wayne,
Subsequent to the CDB approval of this project, the architect has
determined that a slight change needs to be made to the site plan to
accommodate a pump room. Attached is a proposed revision to the site
plan indicating a new pump room on the westernmost side of the site, to be
located above the retention pond with supporting columns located within the
retention pond area. No previously approved landscaping would be
impacted and the pump room structure will meet the required side setback
of 10' and the 18' rear setback as approved by CDB. The pump room will
be finished with materials that would match the previously approved
architectural design and the proposed support columns will not adversely
impact volume of the retention area.
Please discuss this potential revision with the necessary City Staff and let
me know if this is a change that could be administratively approved without
going back to CDB. If this can be approved in-house, then we will be ready
to submit for permitting.
If you have any questions regarding this project, please don't hesitate to call
me at (727) 443-2869.
Very truly yours,
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
Northsille
&~it9 s~ 1ne,
.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RON MENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date:
January 19, 2004
To:
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
I 0 - ~.
'I .
II \ 1.
CITY Or ('I F :,F'l\f,;l ER !
......-.....'" .,...... - --. ....~-~--_._j
Attn: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: FLD2003-06027 & TDR2003-06003 - Brightwater Pointe
205 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0322
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
{)Originals
(X) Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
() Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
() Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
() For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies
1
Date
Description
Elevation of
Comments: Wayne, attached is the elevation as provided by the architect for
the proposed pump room. If you are looking for more detail just let
me know and I will contact him immediately. Please do not hesitate
to contact this office should you have any further questions or
comments reqardinq this proiect.
Copi~_~Jg:
BY:~\ ",
Debra Harris, Senior'PIEr-
.~
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
'Jaq 19 04 09:07a
JOeMarShall Scott Arch. 813.-6234
p. 1
UCllnCf
1({1 JOHN MARSHALL SCOTT
_A R CHI TEe T
PUIIIIS DISICIIU
t/l3/oi f21jI~/t"<-{
~ ~ .
pelllr1 1-IMf2-1 S
FAX TRANSMIITAL
DATE:
--::::>
PAGES INCLUDING COVER: '-
TO:
COMPANY
//[);eTtl9IPC
~..
PROJECT:
pj2l4I1rtJ~
RE:
~fu.1-tf' l1c/vf ezerAflPN
...
3802 EHRLICH ROAD - SUITE 306 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33624 PHONE. (813) 968-6222 FAX. (813) 968-6234
'Ja:"l 19 04 09:07a
J~ Marshall Scott Arch.
81.8-6234
p.2
,,' 'l't "'" . " I' ',"',1',," ,. ,'. , " ." ". '\ '",",r~.,
\, ' I l:~ f 1; ,~\,:, 1 j' I ' ,\ ~ j '\' i' :" j , 1
~ .,! ':. j.;. ~ ",,-}-.I '-i ". " :.
j i I!\; iif! ,'-lpt III li~(,i ,l",~ ,~j 1
. ,-" ct- .: " "',",. .1, - ,
,I t, ., ,I.J, I ,. "J ,.... ~~;. >,< .............v ..,~. .. .~
A
R
C H
PUIIIllI
T
E C T
III1IGIIII
UCIUUU
DATE: 1/13/04
ATTENTION: WAYNE WELLS
COMPANY:
JOB: BRIGHTWATER POINT
RE: SOUTHWEST ELEVATION WITH PUMP ROOM
~ lli:IE 1r CC IBI g
PAGE 1 OF 1
SCALE: 1/6"=1'-0"
9
N
35' CQ.'lCRETE
BALLUSTERS
TOP OF ROOF
SLAB
$.-
'i.- - - - - - - - - - - -
i
9
N
~
9
~
to 9
N
9
N
9
BASE FLOOD ~
ELEVATION 11'-O"'~ - -
5'
MEAN SEA
LEVEL
5>
~ b
~I ~
~~--
PUMP HOUSE
. COLORS AND MATERIALS
TO MA TCA MAl N SUI LOING
--------~---------------
SOUTHWEST ELEVATION
....
3602 EHRLICH RD, SUITE # 306
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33624
TEL. (613)968-6222
FAX (613)968-6234
.
.
"..:nr~.Q,
~J~\.~LOF TNUf~
A'~\ \).."u~~ ~7~
..~f:::y' ">'..~~~
~~l,,\I'/#i"i ~~
~_~~- - '," _l1li
.... -. - ........
~~\- ~ ~$
~~~-~ b~.'
~~lIrunJl~~~""
...........<;~ TE~'.'1I,i1
--.rII"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
January 2, 2004
Ms. Debra Harris
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003, 205 Brightwater Drive
Dear Ms. Harris:
At their meeting on September 16, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved
the above application with the following condition:
"That two "guest" parking spaces be provided and designed to avoid backing into the right-of-
way and the two spaces comply with City Code, and revised plans be submitted to the Planning
Department by September 30, 2003, reflecting this change."
You have submitted a site plan Sheet C3.1, dated August 21, 2003, depicting these two "guest"
parking spaces. The Planning Department approves of these two "guest" parking spaces as
shown.
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at
727 -562-4504.
Cc: Bennett Elbo, Traffic Engineering Department
IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Inactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater 205 Brightwater Pointe (1) -
ApprovedlBrightwater 205 Letter of approval of guest parking 1.2.04.doc
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIOKER
FRANK HIBIJARD, COMMISSIONER * BiLl_JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Nonhside
&~ s~ 1He,
.
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANNING ·
ENVIRONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
November 24, 2003
...... .~ -.-. ..........., "'. ,
'--1 re 0(2:',: .' i-;~ ~
,'", j t'.; i;:
Le.., . 1-'
n.: ....--, -. ._~--'.;::;;.._,"'<.""'""~;.:c-. n.
"<~ .\ I, 'I
D I !Ill!
dU\ NOV 2 5 2003 t~
_ ~:;"'~~':'::'-:-'"::':::::"":.<, .l ~ r
Dc V t.Lt)F~ft tJ~' b L ;"i V H..; ~:c; DePT
CITV OF CLEM,WATER
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Attention:
Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: Brightwater Pointe - FLD2003-06027 - 205 Brightwater Drive
NES Project #0322
Dear Wayne,
Per our discussion on November 19, 2003 I am hereby submitting a revised
site plan for your file based on the conditions of approval as listed within the
Development Order issued on September 18, 2003. These revisions will be
reflected in the site plans being submitted to Development Services for
permitting.
If you have any questions regarding this project, please don't hesitate to call
me at (727) 443-2869.
Very truly yours,
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERIf)JG SERVICES, INC.
(:\ . """".(\ ---I (y--'\~,,<<
\<K::~ J"-....) ( A ,< \ .,<;)\'..,.....,.~
~,~.~'".. :' :'" \<. J\ AU __.,~
Debra A. Harris, Senior Plann81j .
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING,COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
<t1I
.\
.
.
Page 1 0[2
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, December 24,20031 :28 PM
To: Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank; Rice, Scott; Melone, Donald
Cc: Tarapani, Cyndi; Reynolds, Mike; Berry, Bryan
Subject: Brightwater Drive
FYI - Duanne is alerting us to a serious issue on Brightwater Drive. Don't know what the solution is (Duanne has
suggested a solution) and who is going to make and pay for the improvement. Sounds like it affects development
on Brightwater Drive generally.
The issue with Shephard's is a totally separate issue and will be dealt with through the review of the FLS case.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anderson, Duanne
Sent: Wednesday, December 24,2003 11:50 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Garriott, Kevin
Subject: RE: Shephards's expansion plans
Hi Wayne,
My comments are minimal. The Shephards's expansion plans must satisfy the minimum fire code requirements to
gain fire approval. I do have an important concern that has come to my attention. This is associated one of your
many cases, the Brightwater Pointe Condominium proposed location at 205 Brightwater Drive. One of the fire
protection companies has voiced a major concern regarding water supply for required life safety systems i.e.
automatic fire sprinkler protection. The hydraulic calculation for parking garages are considered by NFPA-13 1999
edition as Ordinary Hazard Group 1 requiring a hose allowance of 250gpm (gallons per minute) water supply to
meet that demand.
The current water supplied on Brightwater Drive can not provide the need to support the system. It is further
understood that Brightwater Drive has a dead end water supply system. Perhaps a looped system needs to be
explored to help alleviate this situation. In my opinion, this concern could impact future development of this type
on Brightwater Drive as well as other potential development of this type on another street that has the same type
of water supply. I just wanted to bring this issue to you attention as soon as I received notice. THANKS!
Duanne Anderson
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 8: 18 AM
To: Anderson, Duanne
Subject: FW: Shephards's expansion plans
Duanne -
Any comments?
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Elaine Vlahos [mailto:elenyov@yahoo.com]
12/24/2003
.#
\
.
.
Page 2 of2
Sent: Tuesday, December 23,20032:54 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Shephards's expansion plans
Dear Mr. Wells, I own a condo at Continental Towers and strongly objects to permitting
Shepherd to expand their wave runner business. On any given weekend or holiday the boats
gather, 30 or more, park all along the beachfront, including our residence, come onto our
back property, try to use our pool etc. As tax payers, paying increasingly higher amounts,
we deserve to be considered as Shephard's looks to draw larger crowds to their bar and
wave runner concession. The smell of gas is such that we are unable to use our own pool on
weekends. The noise and general commotion from the combination of boats and wave
runners is destroying our quality of life and the value of our home. I am unable to attend
today's meeting and only received notice in today's mail, too late to voice my concern. The
overdevelopment of our beach needs to stop!
Elaine Vlahos, Apt. 607, 675 S. Gulfview Blvd.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Get your photo on the big screen in Times Sg!lare
12/2412003
.#
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 18, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
NorthsideEngineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205, 209 and 214
Brightwater Drive.
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front
(west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to five feet(to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet
(to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), and increases of building height from 35
feet to 54 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets)
and 16 feet (from roof deck for open gazebos), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, tmder the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four
. existing docks for sole use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for
. three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403. The
Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases
and conditions: .
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BIU]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENTN'ioAFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
I . .
...
.
.
September 18, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Two
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks, lift and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents
and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the
condominiums;
3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
4. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
5. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
6. That two "guest" parking spaces be provided and designed to avoid backing into the right-of-
way and the two spaces comply with City Code, and revised plans be submitted to the
Planning Department by September 30, 2003, reflecting this change;
7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised to indicate all comers of the
proposed building meeting the required front setback of 15 feet;
8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, conflicts between proposed utility lines and
landscaping be resolved;
9. That the site and landscape plans be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to curb all
edges of pavement for the protection of landscaped areas;
10. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy;
12. That prior to the issuance of any permits drainage drawdown calculations be submitted or an
equalizer be provided between the ponds, acceptable to the Engineering Department; and
13. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold
from 130 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the
issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed also must contain a
covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of 130 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of
development rights.
The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the Flexible Development request to
permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C application with the
following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-803.C;
2. The proposal does not meet the purposes of the Community Development Code (Section 1-
103);
... r
.
.
September 18, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Three
3. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
4. The proposal is incompatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on October 2,2003 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
\\MS5cIPDS\Planning Department\C D BlFLEXiPending cases \ Up for the next CDB\Brightwater 205 Brightwater PointelBrightwater 205
Development Order. doc
.
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 12, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development
approval (FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003) to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction ofthe front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side
(north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east)
setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck
and boardwalk), with increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (to roof deck)
with an additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof
deck for open gazebos) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public
right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks
for sole use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three
dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403 at
205,209 and 214 Brightwater Drive.
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front
(west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet
(to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), with increases of building height from 35
feet to 54 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets)
and 16 feet (from roof deck for open gazebos) and to permit parking that is designed to back into
the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole
use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units
from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403 for property located at 205,
209 and 214 Brightwater Drive has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community
Development Board on September 16, 2003.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILLjONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
J,
.
.
September 12,2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
Jf.rz~ ~;, l;.fc~
Senior Planner
\ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiPending cases! Up for the next CDBlBrightwater 205 Brightwater Pointe!Brightwater 205
CDB Letter.doc
.
CITY OF
.
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FIDRIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 2, 2003
Ms. Debra Harris
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205,209 and 214 Brightwater Drive
Dear Ms. Harris:
The subject property is zoned T, Tourist District and is consistent with the underlying land use
designation of RFH, Resort Facility High category. The subject property of 0.595 acres will support 17
residential dwelling units, based on the maximum allowable density of 30 dwelling units per acre.
Additional residential dwelling units are being added to this project through the Transfer of Development
Rights of three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, based on a maximum of 20 percent of the
allowable number of units (17), in accordance with the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403.E.3 of
the Community Development Code.
Attached is a copy of the current Tourist zoning district regulations and the beach by design guidelines
referencing density, as contained within the Community Development Code.
Please contact Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner (727-562-4504 or wayne.wells@clearwater-fl.com), if
you need further assistance. Zoning designation information is available through the City's website at
www.c1eaar-.mvia the "Clearwater Parcel and Zoning" link.
Cc: File
S:IPlnnning Depnrtmentlzpninf.! /trs\205. 209 (lJId 214 Brif.!htwnter Drive (I).doc
tlRlANJ. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BIll.JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Nonhside
&~ s~~~ 1~,
.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
'."
I'
August28,2003
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Attention:
Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: Brightwater Pointe - FLD2003-06027 - 205 Brightwater Drive
NES Project #0322
Dear Wayne,
Will you please verify the zoning district for the property located at 205,209
and 214 Brightwater Drive (the Brightwater Pointe project)? Additionally,
please verify the total number of allowable dwelling units on site inclusive of
units allowable through the TOR process? This site is comprised of .595
acres.
~. :1
!"'.'
Time is of the essence in regards to this request and I would appreciate any
help you can offer in the way of expediting a response.
If you have any questions regarding this project, please don't hesitate to call
me at (727) 443-2869.
Very truly yours,
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
\~D(}([\~ ~
Debra A. Harris, Project AamiTi1slffitor .~
encl: $25.00 check for Zoning Letter fee
...:
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
Receipt #: 1200300000000008541
Date: 08/29/2003
8/29/2003
11:24:12AM
.
Line Items:
Case No
Tran Code
Description
Revenue Account No
Amount Paid
-ZL TR
Zoning Verification Letter - 25.0000 @ $1.0000
010-341405
Line Item Total:
25.00
$25.00
Payments:
Method
Payer
Bank No
Account No
Confirm No
How Received
Amount Paid
Cash
DEBRA HARRIS
In Person
2.
Payment Total:
$25.00
AI
CK. NO.- ~ ~ -I!J!J
DATE-
e
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
cReceipt.rpt
Page 1 of 1
Norlhsille
&~ s~ 1t<<-,
.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVIRONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 21,2003
To: City of Clearwater - Public Works Administration
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn: D. Scott Rice, P.E., Land Development Engineering Manager
Reference: FLD2003-06027 & TDR2003-06003 - Brightwater Pointe
205 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0322
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
(X) Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date Description
15 Revised C5.1 and C3.1 for COB submittal (2
sheets)
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this proiect.
COp+es.To: File \
(, "1--"" ~-~. \
.\'i, ) \ (">."
By. ~e6r~H'~rr;;:'~roJ'e8t.)~i~or
" \
"'''-J
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI NG,COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
.
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (]27) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
July 25,2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side
(north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east)
setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck),
with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and the Transfer of
Development Rights for three dwelling units, under the provisions of Section 4-1403
(Case Nos. FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003, 205 Brightwater Drive).
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit
attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to
pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction
of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and reductions ofthe rear (east)
setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), with an
increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet and to permit parking that is designed to back
into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units,
under the provisions of Section 4-1403, at 205 Brightwater Drive. After a preliminary review of
the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete, but with the
following submissions or revisions necessary:
1. The "Description of Request" and all appropriate criteria, as part of Exhibit "A," must
include and address an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (see also
Comment 23 below) and a reduction ofthe rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to
building).
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
...
.
.
July 25, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
2. The application is requesting the approval to permit parking that is designed to back into
the public right-of-way. Two of these spaces are less than the required 19 feet stall
length, thereby having a portion of the spaces within the right-of-way, which is no
different than some existing conditions along Brightwater Drive and not allowed by
Code. Staff will not support this portion of the request.
3. Based on the site design on Sheet C3.1, it is unclear why the 4'x8' shed in the northeast
comer of the property is not being removed. Revise Sheet C2.1 or C3.1 appropriately.
4. Assuming the submitted drawings are drawn to scale, the inside dimension of the parking
portion of the building scales to only 61 feet across, providing for two 18- foot long
spaces (even though dimensioned at 19-foot lengths) with a 24-foot wide drive aisle.
Code requires parking spaces to be 19 feet in length.
5. Due to the building design, parking spaces 14 and 15, assuming they meet the required
19-foot space length, do not have the required 24 feet drive aisle width (stall length and
drive aisle scale to 41 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
6. Parking spaces 19 and 30 are not provided with the required 24 feet drive aisle (stall
length and drive aisle scale to 35 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
7. The visibility triangles on the inside of the driveways are drawn incorrectly. The one leg
of the triangle is along the front property line (right-of-way line), not perpendicular to the
edge of the driveway. Revise. This should eliminate the encroachment of the building
into the visibility triangles.
8. From a building wall opening standpoint, the site plan is unclear as to what portions of
the building at ground level are open versus solid. Revising the site plan on at least Sheet
C3.1 and then on building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to indicate solid
walls/columns versus open areas with building above would be helpful in understanding
the relationship of the parking garage area to the outside areas and the building
elevations.
9. Likewise with the comment above, revising the building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6
to indicate what portions of the walls at ground level are open versus solid would assist in
understanding the architecture of the building in relationship to the parking garage and
pedestrian/vehicular circulation.
10. It is unclear the purpose of the new ramp adjacent to the building north of the pool. If for
handicap access to the pool, show the width of the sidewalk, the designated pathway to it
and, due to the site plan being unclear as to the location of building openings versus solid
walls, and a doorway/building opening to allow handicap passage from the parking area
to the outside.
11. Since east/southeast side of the building is irregular in shape, provide dimensions to all
points of the east/southeast side of the building (not just the two locations provided) to
ensure that all points of the building is at the proposed 18-foot setback.
12. Like Comment #12 above, provide a dimension from the west and north property lines to
the other closest point of the building and provide a dimension from the front property
line to the closest building point on the southwest side and the middle of the building (at
dumpster staging area).
..
.
.
July 25, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
13. Proposed 6" DCV A on Sheet C5.1 shown to be located, and conflicting with, a guest
parking space. Revise.
14. With existing docks being re-used for the proposed condominiums, unclear how they will
be accessed (sidewalk?). Advise/show.
15. Retention basinlunderdrain detail (1) on Sheet C6.1 does not match retention basin design
on Sheet C4.1. Revise/ make consistent. Also, provide a cross section through retention
pond.
16. General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site
design. If not used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match
proposed site design.
17. Unclear why 6" vertical curbing is being used in parking garage area adjacent to parking
spaces, as there is no adjacent landscape area being protected. Revise/advise.
18. Visibility triangles must also be shown adjacent to parking that is backing out into the
Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Show visibility triangles on Sheets C3.1 and LA-I.
Comply with visibility triangle requirements.
19. Show waterfront visibility triangles at the northeast and southwest comers of the property
on Sheets C3.1 and LA-I.
20. Based on the overall building dimension for the building northeast to southwest stated on
Sheet A2 of 219'-3 'li", revise Sheets C3.I, C4.I, C5.1 and LA-I to show the building
with another angle at the northeast and southwest comers of the building, rather than the
comers shown.
21. Since color renderings were not provided of the building elevations, provide greater
specificity on the building elevations on Sheets AS and A6 to indicate intended color
scheme, including columns, pilasters, railings, window/door frames, facia/trim, banding,
etc.
22. Front building elevations on Sheet AS indicate that most windows (and French doors) on
that elevation will be multi-paned. Unclear why all windows aren't similarly detailed,
including side and rear elevations.
23. By architectural elevations, mansard roofs are proposed around the edges of the building,
which will have a main, flat roof. The height of 54 feet has been provided to this roof
slab. Code limits parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs to a maximum of
30 inches above the flat roof. The proposed mansards (parapet walls) are designed at
approximately 6'-8" above the main roof slab. This additional height will need to be
included as part of the request, which justification for the increase in height.
Additionally, Code allows elevator equipment rooms and like equipment enclosures to
project no more than 16 feet higher than, in this case, the main roof slab. The application
is not clear where mechanical equipment, such as air condenser units, are proposed to be
located. Concerned that the three storage rooms indicated on the roof plan are an
additional floor and do not meet the provisions of the Code. Beach by Design for this
Small Motel District also restricts residential uses to two to four stories over ground-level
parking. This appears to be, with these storage rooms, to be five stories over ground-
level parking, which would then not be in compliance with Beach by Design. Further, the
1-- ---
.
.
July 25, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 4
elevator shafts exceed the 16 feet Code limitation (roof shown to be an approximate
additional 5' -1 "). Should you desire to retain the storage rooms, parapets/mansard and
other features described, these also must be included as part of the request, with the
justification for such. Staff may not be supportive of these height increases. Make clear
proposed heights (from base flood elevation) on elevations and in application.
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by
noon on August 18,2003 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on August 14,
2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate
time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any
questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
*Make us your favorite!
Sincerely,
6!~;1 ~;, ~~
Senior Planner
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next DRC\Brightwater 205 Brightwater PointelBrightwater 205
Complete Letter 7.25.03.doc
.
.
.
,~~~LOF rll~
t!J
~~~t,.dl/ ;. . ~\.
~C":>> - - - ~,=
~~ - ~
~~ -==- ~~T
~~m~~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
June 25,2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction ofthe front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side
(north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction of the rear (east)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and reductions of the landscape buffer
along the west and north sides from five to zero feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and the transfer of
development rights for seven dwelling units, under the provisions of Section 4-1403
(Case Nos. FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003), 205 Brightwater Drive).
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit
attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to
pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction
of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction of the rear (east)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and reductions of the landscape buffer along the
west and north sides from five to zero feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C and the transfer of development rights for seven dwelling units,
under the provisions of Section 4-1403, at 205 Brightwater Drive. After a preliminary review of
the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete. Section 4-202
of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the
deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action
shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. The
next submittal deadline is July 16, 2003 (noon) to be reviewed for sufficiency by the
Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 14,2003.
The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete:
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BIU]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
..
Jr.
J2.
j 3.
J4.
J 5.
j 6.
G)
J 2.
.
.
June 25, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
Application form submitted was for "Residential Infill Project." The correct application
that must be submitted is for "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project," which has
different Flexible criteria to be addressed.
Application is for the development of the property with 24 units. Based on the permitted
maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre and the parcel size, a maximum of 17
dwelling units is permitted. Under the provisions of Section 4-1402, only a maximum of
20% of the maximum permitted density may be transferred to the subject property, or
three dwelling units. You have exceeded the maximum allowed density with the transfer
of development rights by four units. The project must be reduced by four units to be
processed. This reduction affects many plans submitted with this application that must be
amended.
Submit documentation that the mortgage holder of the sending parcel(s) consent to the
transfer of development rights.
The affidavit of ownership by the property owner of the sending properties must contain
(same information as 120 Brightwater Drive, Case Nos. FLD2003-02006/TDR2003-
02001):
. Evidence of recording of the special warranty deed conveying the development rights
or if the applicant has entered into an option agreement for the transfer of
development rights, a statement that the deed of transfer will be recorded in the event
that the application is approved prior to the issuance of a building permit
. A statement that the development rights reflected in the instrument of conveyance
have not been conveyed to any person other than the applicant or his predecessor in
title.
. A statement that the development rights have not been previously used or exercised
by any person on the parcel of land from which the development rights have been
transferred or any other parcel of land.
Please be specific as to responses to requirements of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403, such as
how the sending parcel is in compliance with Code provisions.
It is unclear who signed a letter from Paradise Cove of Clearwater, Inc., or their
relationship to the corporation.
While not part of a completeness review, I have provided preliminary information about the
sufficiency of the applications. More comments will be provided by the DRC once the
applications are deemed complete.
General comments related to the sufficiency of the application:
The application is requesting the approval to permit parking that is designed to back into
the public right-of-way. Staff will not support this portion of the request.
The application requests zero side setbacks on both the north and west sides of the
property. With proposed grading and curbing of the drive aisles, the adjoining properties
will have to view a minimum 1.5 feet high retaining wall with no landscaping to mute the
.
.
June 25, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
CP
@
J5.
16.
Ci)
J 8.
J9.
JlO.
111.
/12.
@
@
QD
@
17.
effects of a four-story building over ground level parking. Staff will not support these
requests.
Assuming the submitted drawings are drawn to scale, the inside dimension of the parking
portion of the building scales to only 61 feet across, providing for two 18-foot long
spaces with a 24- foot wide drive aisle. Code requires parking spaces to be 19 feet in
length.
Due to the building design, parking spaces 1 and 14, assuming they meet the required 19-
foot space length, do not have the required 24 feet drive aisle width.
It is unclear why the solo parking spaces outside of the building on the west and north
sides of the building are not numbered.
Due to a proposed wall between space # 19 and the northern, unnumbered parking space,
a vehicle parked in the unnumbered space will be required to back out blindly into the
proposed, exit-only drive aisle, which creates safety issues. This circumstance of backing
into the drive aisle blindly due to proposed building walls also affects parking spaces 8,
20 and 21.
Parking spaces 17/18 and 30/31 are not provided with the required 24 feet drive aisle
(stall length and drive aisle scale to 38 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
Due to angled building walls proposed at the comers of parking spaces 20 and 33, the
effective stall length is 14 feet, not meeting the Code required stall length of 19 feet.
Without a designated path from the trash rooms to the dumpster staging areas and
proposed building walls, it is unclear how the dumpsters will get from the trash rooms to
the staging areas.
Since retention pond #2 is designed identical to retention pond #1, it is unclear why
retention pond #2 does not also have a control structure like pond #1.
Since existing docks are proposed to be re-used, fire risers should be placed every 100
feet to provide fire protection to these docks.
Unclear why fire lines and FDC connection pipes are routed into elevator shafts.
With existing docks being re-used for the proposed condominiums, unclear how they will
be accessed (sidewalk?).
Retention basinlunderdrain detail (1) on Sheet C6.1 does not match retention basin design
on Sheet C4.1. Revise/ make consistent.
General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site
design. If not used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match
proposed site design.
Provide greater detail of proposed color of building elements (columns, pilasters, railings,
window/door frames, facia/trim, banding, etc.). Paint chips are acceptable to be
submitted.
By architectural elevations, mansard roofs are proposed around the edges of the building,
which will have a flat roof. The height of 54 feet has been provided to this roof slab.
However, there are other building elements that are taller than the mansard roof. It is
unclear what these projections are and why they project higher than the mansard roof.
Advise/make clearer, including the height of these other building projections.
--
.
.
June 25, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 4
18. It is suggested that banding that is proposed on three sides of the building be continued on
the rear elevation ofthe building also.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
fl~ vf::!,., ~~
Senior Planner
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning Department\C D BlFLEX\Pending cases \ Up for the next DRC\Brightwater 205 Brightwater Pointe\Brightwater 205
Incomplete Letter. doc
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Gerlock, Frank
Monday, September 15, 2003 1 :03 PM
Wells, Wayne
205,209,214 Brightwater
I don't know if Lisa sent you these comments, but they are:
the street ele. is grossly exaggerated and wayne needs to mark it up and show the right of way, the picture looks as if the
row is a private dirve and includes a paver culde sac with landscaping, also the rendered site plans obviously eleimnates
the guest parking spaces that they are requesting, cannot be on consent.
chip
1
e
-
CDB Meeting Date: September 16.2003
Case Numbers: FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003
Agenda Item: D5
OR/GINAl
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNERS:
Larry J. and Barbara S. Miller and Laurence 1. and Barbara S.
Miller.
APPLICANT:
Brightwater Pointe, LLC (c/o Roland Rogers).
REPRESENT ATIVE:
Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
LOCATION:
205,209 and 214 Brightwater Drive
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to
pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet
to five feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east) setback
from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to
pool deck and boardwalk), with increases of building height from 35
feet to 54 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six feet (from roof
deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof deck for open
gazebos) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C
(retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole
use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights
for three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the
provisions of Section 4-1403.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 0.595 acres; 25,918 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 106 feet of lot width along Brightwater Drive by 110 feet of depth
(pie shaped property).
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page I
e
e
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Overnight accommodations
Attached dwellings (condominium - 20 units)
PLAN CATEGORY:
RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
T, Tourist District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Overnight accommodations
West: Overnight accommodations
East: Intracoastal waterway
South: Intracoastal waterway
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses dominate
Brightwater Drive.
ANALYSIS:
The pie-shaped site is 0.595 acres located at the eastern terminus of Brightwater Drive,
approximately 1,700 feet east of Harnden Drive. It is located along a highly developed area within
Clearwater Beach and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the Small
Motel District of Beach By Design, which provides for the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive
with townhomes and timeshares between two and four stories above parking.
The site is currently developed with a one- and two, two-story residentiaVovernight
accommodation buildings of 16 units. The existing two-story buildings are approximately 20 feet
in height. The site has the appearance of one, undefined, existing driveway along most of the front
property line (Brightwater Drive), where parking spaces can "back out" into the right-of-way. The
site is currently nonconforming with regard to "back out" parking and front, side and rear setbacks.
The site also contains four existing docks and seven boat slips, to be retained for resident and guest
usage only and will not be sub-leased. All existing improvements (buildings, pavement, walkways
and decks) will be removed as part of the site's redevelopment.
The proposal includes constructing a 20-unit, four-story (over ground level parking) residential
condominium building. A total of 17 dwelling units are permitted for the subject property, based
on the maximum of 30 units per acre. The applicant is proposing the utilization of three dwelling
units through the Transfer of Development Rights from 130 Brightwater Drive (which is the
maximum of 20 percent of the maximum number of dwelling units allowed by the Residential
Facility High land use classification). The first two levels will contain six units on each floor,
while the third level will have five units and the top level will have three units. The units on the
first two levels will range in size from 1,868 square feet to 2,017 square feet in area. Units on the
third level will range from 2,228 square feet to 2,610 square feet in area. Units on the top level
will be greater than 3,600 square feet each. The 30 parking spaces under the building will include
1.5 spaces per unit and two handicap spaces, accessible through a designated one-way circulation
(entrance on the southwest side and exit on the north side). The applicant has provided four
"guest" parking spaces that back out into the right-of-way of Brightwater Drive. While the
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 2
e
e
redevelopment of this site will eliminate the majority of the "back out" parking, staff does not
support the design of these "guest" spaces. The Community Development Code prohibits "back
out" parking for any uses other than detached dwellings. To date, staff has only supported the
concept of "back out" parking for townhomes only located on Brightwater Drive. These
townhomes have individual garages and driveways and operate as, and have the characteristics of,
single-family detached homes. The driveway lengths for these townhomes permit a vehicle to
completely "back out" of the garage, thus eliminating the garage walls as a potential view
obstruction of the sidewalk and street.
The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with a reduction ofthe front
(west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to five feet (to pavement), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet
(to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), under the provisions of Section 2-803 as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The side setback reductions are to the pavement of
the entrance and exit driveways only. The proposed building meets the front and side setback
requirements. A cantilevered awning in the front center of the building is also proposed, as the
Code allows such projections when not attached to the ground. The rear setback proposed to the
building will still comply with the Building Code requirement of an 18 feet setback from the
seawall. The rear setback reduction is otherwise to the pool and pool deck, which is consistent
with other approved projects on Brightwater Drive and Bayway Boulevard. Adjustments to the
Building Code setback (less than 18 feet) are also reviewed by the Building Official prior to
building permit issuance.
The proposal includes increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (to roof deck), with an
additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof deck for open
gazebos). The proposed building of four stories over ground level parking is consistent with that
envisioned by Beach by Design for this street. Code provisions allow parapet walls to extend a
maximum of 30-inches above the roof deck. The applicant is requesting to increase the parapet to
a total of six feet from the roof deck. This six-feet high parapet is located on the front of the
building and on the north and southwest sides of the building, will hide rooftop air condensing
units and will be in proportion with the building fal(ade. The proposal also includes two open
gazebos on the waterside of the building that will be 16 feet in height (from roof deck to peak of
the gazebo roof) for architectural embellishment and to provide visual relief. The roof deck is also
a common element for the condominiums. The waterside of the roof will be enclosed for safety
and Building Code purposes with a three-foot high balustrade, which will not block water views
from residents and guests while on the roof deck. Code provisions allow, and the proposal
includes, elevator towers, stair towers and mechanical equipment rooms to be a maximum of 16
feet above the roof deck. The proposed gazebos will, therefore, be consistent with the elevator
towers, stair towers and mechanical equipment rooms proposed on the front side of the building.
The Mediterranean Revival style of architecture of the building will include light beige/hazelwood
stucco for the main building color, accented by the elevator towers in a darker shade (soft gold)
that will also be for the ground-level parking walls and architectural trim. The parapet walls will
contain a clay-colored barrel tile roof. The window, facia and railings will be white in color. The
building will have a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations, primarily
facing the water.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 3
e
It
The landscape plan exceeds the Code requirements utilizing a colorful groundcover (wedelia),
shrubs (including cocoplum and hibiscus) and trees (including washingtonia palms and silver
buttonwoods). Additional landscaping may be possible on the rooftop deck of the building.
Conflicts between proposed utility lines and landscape materials will need to be resolved prior to
the issuance of any permits. All edges of pavement will need to be curbed for the protection of
landscaped areas.
The applicant will remove all existing signs. No new signs are proposed with this development.
Dumpsters wheeled to the street and placed within a staging area on pickup days will remove solid
waste. To ensure the required front setback will be met, the site plan will need to indicate the 15-
foot dimension to all comers of the proposed building. All required Parks and Recreation impact
fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. Proposed utility
facilities (electric and communication lines) on-site and existing aboveground utility facilities in
the public rights-of-way will be required to be placed underground, or provisions made for placing
the utilities underground (including interim construction details to be completed prior to the
issuance of the first certificate of occupancy) within time frames acceptable to the City. Drainage
drawdown calculations will need to be submitted or an equalizer will need to be provided between
the ponds prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. A special warranty deed, specifying
the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 130 Brightwater Drive and being
transferred to this site, is required to be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this
project. This special warranty deed also must contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use
of 130 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of development rights.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-801.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units per 14 units 20 dwelling Yes
acre (17 units)/40 units
overnight (including
accommodation TDR of three
units per acre (23 units from
units) 130
Brightwater
Dr.
IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.80 0.65 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 4
e
e
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803):
ST ANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 25,918 square 25,918 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 106 feet 106 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A West: zero feet West: zero feet Yes
SETBACK to pavement; to pavement; 15
19.9 feet to feet to building
building
REAR N/A South and East: South and East: Yes
SETBACK 17.2 feet to 18 feet to
building; three building; zero
feet to concrete feet to pool deck
deck
SIDE N/A North: 4.7 feet North: five feet Yes
SETBACK to building; zero to pavement; 10
feet to pavement feet to building
West: 4.6 feet to West: five feet to
building; zero pavement; 10
feet to pavement feet to building
ST ANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
HEIGHT N/A 20 feet 54 feet (to roof Yes
maximum deck) with an
additional six
feet (from roof
deck for
perimeter
parapets) and 16
feet (from roof
deck for open
gazebos)
PARKING Determined by undetermined 30 spaces plus Yes
SPACES the Community four spaces for
minimum Development guests that back
Director based into the R.O.W.
on the specific
use and/or ITE
Manual standards
(30 required
based on 1.5
spaces per unit)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 5
e
e
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803.C):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property was developed between 1954 and 1962 and has been used as
overnight accommodations since that time. The existing one- and two-story buildings on
the site have undergone some deterioration. The proposal includes a redevelopment of the
site with a 20-unit attached condominium of four residential floor levels over ground level
parking.
The applicant proposes 20 mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with Beach by Design.
The allowable density for this site permits 17 dwelling units, based on the maximum
density of 30 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing the utilization of three
dwelling units through the Transfer of Development Rights from 130 Brightwater Drive
(which is the maximum of 20 percent of the maximum number of dwelling units allowed
by the Residential Facility High land use classification). The requested side setback
reductions are to the entrance and exit driveways only (the building itself meets the
required front and side setbacks). Rear setback reductions to the building are minimal and
still meet Building Code setback requirements to the seawall (18 feet). Rear setback
reductions otherwise are for the pool, pool deck and boardwalk to the existing docks.
Many properties along Brightwater Drive currently have zero setbacks to property lines and
"back out" parking onto Brightwater Drive. Many of the existing parking spaces for these
properties exist within the right-of-way. The applicant proposes to provide on-site parking
meeting the Code requirement of 1.5 spaces per unit (30 spaces), with the exception of four
additional "guest" spaces designed to back into the right-of-way at the end ofthe cul-de-sac
in front of the building. The Community Development Code prohibits "back out" parking
for any uses other than detached dwellings. Staff is not in support of this request for back
out parking, even if intended for guests. To date, staff has only supported the concept of
"back out" parking for townhomes only located on Brightwater Drive. These townhomes
have individual garages and driveways and operate as, and have the characteristics of,
single-family detached homes. The driveway lengths for these townhomes permit a vehicle
to completely "back out" of the garage, thus eliminating the garage walls as a potential
view obstruction of the sidewalk and street.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Inlill
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The proposed residential use will help stabilize and likely enhance property values in the
area by providing a refurbished site and a new building. The current assessed valuation of
the site is $1,274,400. With the redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is
projected at $15,840,000. This increase in property value is expected to have a beneficial
effect on surrounding properties.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 6
e
e
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings and specifically within the Tourist
District. The request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
due to the proposed reduction in setbacks, the height increases and the proposed "back out"
parking.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Overnight accommodation uses presently dominate Brightwater Drive and are located on
the properties to the north and west. Brightwater Drive is being redeveloped with attached
dwellings, either in the form of townhomes or condominium flats. The property to the
northwest at 200 Brightwater Drive has been approved and constructed with 10
townhomes. Farther west on both sides of Brightwater Drive are expected future
townhome sites. Across the water to the south are single-family dwellings (zoned LMDR).
The lot adjacent to the north is developed with six rental, attached dwellings. The site is
located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which recommends the
redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with attached dwellings between two and four stories
above parking. The proposal is to construct a 20-unit, four-story over ground level
parking, attached dwelling building. The proposal will aid in the revitalization of the
Brightwater Drive and Clearwater Beach as a whole. This location provides an opportunity
to redevelop a portion of Clearwater that is currently undergoing renewed investment and
redevelopment.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The location of the site, in relation to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico, makes it
uniquely and ideally suited for the proposed attached dwelling development. The applicant
desires to locate a multi-family development along waterfront property within an emerging,
residential neighborhood. Properties with these characteristics are limited within the City.
The applicant is developing a property consistent with and encouraged by Beach by Design
and is developing other similar projects on Clearwater Beach.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The Mediterranean architecture and landscape design will be consistent
with other new development on Brightwater Drive. It may influence similar
redevelopment efforts in the area.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDRZ003-06003 - Page 7
e
e
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and building. The site
is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which recommends the
redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with attached dwellings between two and four stories
above required parking. The City will benefit by having an attractive building located in a
redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape enhancements will significantly
improve the site. The proposal incorporates well-articulated, unified elevations and
coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
construction of an attractive residential development. The proposed project reflects the
City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design.
The requested side setback reductions are to the entrance and exit driveways only (the
building itself meets the required front and side setbacks). Rear setback reductions to the
building are minimal and still meet Building Code setback requirements to the seawall (18
feet). Rear setback reductions otherwise are for the pool, pool deck and boardwalk to the
existing docks. These proposed setback reductions are consistent with other approved
redevelopment projects on Brightwater Drive. The applicant proposes to provide on-site
parking meeting the Code requirement of 1.5 spaces per unit (30 spaces), with the
exception of four additional "guest" spaces designed to back into the right-of-way at the
end of the cul-de-sac in front of the building. The Community Development Code
prohibits "back out" parking for any uses other than detached dwellings. Staff is not in
support of this request for back out parking, even if intended for guests. To date, staff has
only supported the concept of "back out" parking for townhomes only located on
Brightwater Drive.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Adequate parking is being provided on-site with 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or 30 spaces.
Four additional "guest" spaces are being designed to back into the right-of-way at the end
of the cul-de-sac in front of the building. The Community Development Code prohibits
"back out" parking for any uses other than detached dwellings. Staff is not in support of
this request for back out parking, even if intended for guests. To date, staff has only
supported the concept of "back out" parking for townhomes only located on Brightwater
Drive.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 8
e
It
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3 (Beach by Design).
The proposed Mediterranean architecture will be aesthetically pleasing, blending with other
similar projects to along Brightwater Drive. The proposed landscaping will lend in
differentiating Clearwater Beach from other beach areas. The residential design of the
proposed project will help to create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" along
Brightwater Drive.
D. CRITERIA FOR THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (Section 4-1403):
1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting property.
The current assessed valuation of the site is $1,274,400. With the redevelopment proposal,
the assessed valuation is projected at $15,840,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings and specifically within the Tourist
District.
3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
Overnight accommodation uses generally presently dominate Brightwater Drive and are
located on the properties to the north and west. Brightwater Drive is being redeveloped
with attached dwellings, either in the form of townhomes or condominium flats. The
property to the northwest at 200 Brightwater Drive has been approved and constructed with
10 townhomes. Further west on both sides of Brightwater Drive are six additional projects
either on this same or a future CDB agenda also for townhomes. Across the water to the
south are single-family dwellings (zoned LMDR). The lot adjacent to the north is
developed with six rental, attached dwellings. The site is located within the Small Motel
District of Beach By Design, which recommends the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive
with attached dwellings between two and four stories above parking. The proposal is to
construct a 20-unit, four-story over ground level parking, attached dwelling building. The
proposal will aid in the revitalization of the Brightwater Drive and Clearwater Beach as a
whole. This location provides an opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater that is
currently undergoing renewed investment and redevelopment.
4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The Mediterranean architecture and landscape design will be consistent
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 9
e It
with other new development on Brightwater Drive. It may influence similar
redevelopment efforts in the area.
5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the
community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and building. The site
is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which recommends the
redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with attached dwellings between two and four stories
above required parking. The City will benefit by having an attractive building located in a
redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape enhancements will significantly
improve the site. The proposal incorporates well-articulated, unified elevations and
coordinated architectural elements.
E. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
construction of an attractive residential development. The proposed project reflects the
City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design.
The site is generally unmarketable and unusable without the requested side and rear
setback reductions. The additional height will provide visual interest and architectural
articulation, within the proportions of the proposed building.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Tourist District and is in an area characterized by attached dwellings and
overnight accommodation establishments. The character and intensity of the proposed
development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The development
complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Tourist District.
The proposal is consistent with Beach by Design and will encourage the like-
redevelopment of other sites. The proposed redevelopment will substantially improve the
value of the subject property, which will have a positive impact on surrounding properties.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 10
e
e
The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood, is permitted in the Tourist District and is encouraged Beach by Design. The
proposal includes 20 owner-occupied, dwelling units with landscaping and parking spaces
meeting Code requirements, in addition to other on-site amenities. The proposal includes
four parking spaces for guests that "back out" into the right-of-way of Brightwater Drive,
which could produce safety concerns to pedestrians. Staff is not in support of these "guest"
spaces that "back out" into the right-of-way.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will improve the existing ingress/egress points of access from
Brightwater Drive, which is basically one large driveway/parking area. The proposal
includes redeveloping the site with 20 attached condominium dwellings, replacing 16
existing motel rooms/apartments. Vehicle trip generation should decrease with this
proposal. The proposal, with the exception of the "guest" parking that is designed to "back
out" into the right-of-way, reduces driveways to an entrance driveway on the southwest
side and an exit driveway on the north side.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the intent for the Small Motel District under
Beach by Design. Construction of these attached condominiums will continue the changes
occurring on Brightwater Drive and raise the standards of the community character of this
area of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes removing all existing buildings and pavement and constructing a 20-
unit, four-story, attached condominium building over ground level parking, with attractive
architecture and well-designed landscaping. Dumpsters wheeled to the street and placed
within a staging area on pickup days will remove solid waste. Proposed utility facilities
(electric and communication lines) on-site and existing aboveground utility facilities in the
public rights-of-way will be required to be placed underground, or provisions made for
placing the utilities underground (including interim construction details to be completed
prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy) within timeframes acceptable to
the City.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 17, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west) setback
from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 11
e
e
feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and
reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero
feet (to pool deck and boardwalk) and with increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (to
roof deck) with an additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from
roof deck for open gazebos), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole
use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units from
130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403 for the site at 205, 209 and 214
Brightwater Drive, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks, lift and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or
guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the
condominiums;
3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
4. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
5. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
6. That the four "guest" parking spaces designed to back into the right-of-way be eliminated from
the site plan and revised plans be submitted to the Planning Department by September 30,
2003, reflecting this change;
7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised to indicate all comers of the
proposed building meeting the required front setback of 15 feet;
8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, conflicts between proposed utility lines and
landscaping be resolved;
9. That the site and landscape plans be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to curb all
edges of pavement for the protection of landscaped areas;
10. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy;
12. That prior to the issuance of any permits drainage drawdown calculations be submitted or an
equalizer be provided between the ponds, acceptable to the Engineering Department; and
13. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold
from 130 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance
of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed also must contain a covenant
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDR2003-06003 - Page 12
e
e
restricting in perpetuity the use of 130 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of development
rights.
The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development request to permit
parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C for the site at 205, 209 and 214
Brightwater Drive, with the following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-803.C;
2. The proposal does not meet the purposes of the Community Development Code (Section 1-
103);
3. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
4. The proposal is incompatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending caseslUpfor the next CDBIBrightwater 205 Brightwater PointelBrightwater 205 Staff
Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 Case FLD2003-6027/TDRZ003-06003 - Page 13
..
2:50 p.m.
"'\
.
e
.
FINAL AUGUST 14.2003. DRC COMMENTS FOR FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003
205.209 and 214 BRIGHTWATERDRIVE
Case: FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205,209 and 214 Brightwater Drive - Brightwater Pointe
Owners: Larry L. and Barbara S. Miller.
Applicant: Brightwater Pointe, LLC (Roland Rogers).
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-28691 fax: 727-446-80361 email: nestech{@mindspring.com).
Location: 0.34 acres on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 300 feet east of Harnden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and
reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to
pool deck), with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole
use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units, under the
provisions of Section 4-1403.
Proposed Use: Twenty (20) attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson and Dianne Hufford.
ApplicantlRepresentative: Housh Ghovaee, Debra Harris, John Scott, Roland Rogers, Mike Waley and
Tom Wan.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees are due prior to issuance of
building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1
residential unit. If 16 existing hotel/motel guestrooms, 4 residential units will be credited and the
assessment will be based on 16 new residential units. Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817.
2. Stormwater:
a) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds (before CDB).
b) The southern pond has no outfall or subdrain. How will it perc through sub drain in northern pond
(before building permit)?
c) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5 (before building permit).
3. Traffic En!!:ineerin!!::
a) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles on the landscaping site plans. No structures or
landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty inches (30")
above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's Community
Development Code, Section 3-904).
b) Add do not enter signs per MUTCD at the egress driveway.
c) Add proper signage and pavement markings to inform the driver the direction of traffic flow for
one-way direction.
d) All regular parking spaces must meet the City's minimum dimensions for a 90-degree parking
stall and maintain a 24' drive aisle without any intrusions.
e) Handicap parking stalls and handicapped aisles must meet the City's minimum dimensions
without any intrusions (i.e. columns).
f) Show on the site plan current City standard Handicap parking stall and "sign" details i.e. $255.
Page 1014
,
...
..
.
.
g) Is the radius of garage entrance and exit adequate for vehicles? Show vehicles entering and
exiting garage at it's radius.
h) Will this be a gated condominium? If so, show on the site plan the gate and console. How will
this gate be operated?
i) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
j) TIF to be determined and paid prior to CO.
4. General Ene:ineerine::
a) Ductile Iron pipe must be used for fIre hydrant line (Contract SpecifIcations and Standards,
Article 41.03.C3) and for one joint on service side of new DCV A.
b) DefIne where existing water line and new water main extension are located within the ROW of
Brightwater Drive. Existing and proposed pipelines are shown using the same line symbol and
line weight. Use different line weights so that existing and proposed lines can be differentiated.
c) 6"x6" tee w/6"x2" reducer not required for the domestic water line. City will tap the water main
to set the meter. All applicable fees to paid by the applicant.
d) Need to core existing manhole for sanitary sewer connection.
e) Need to relocate the new sanitary manhole to within the ROW of Brightwater Drive.
f) What are the new 6" sanitary line and clean out going to serve? Pool, pump, etc. cannot be
connected to the sanitary system.
g) Are these condominiums? If so, plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit.
h) Address prior to scheduling for CDB.
5. Plannine::
a) The "Description of Request" and all appropriate criteria, as part of Exhibit "A," must include
and address an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (or whatever the proposed
height is to be - see also Comment "v" below) and a reduction of the rear (east) setback from 20
feet to 18 feet (to building).
b) The application is requesting the approval to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way. Two of these spaces are less than the required 19 feet stall length, thereby
having a portion of the spaces within the right-of-way, which is no different than some existing
conditions along Brightwater Drive and not allowed by Code.
c) Based on the site design on Sheet C3.l, it is unclear why the 4'x 8' shed in the northeast comer of
the property is not being removed. Revise Sheet C2.1 or C3.1 appropriately.
d) Assuming the submitted drawings are drawn to scale, the inside dimension of the parking portion
of the building scales to only 61 feet across, providing for two 18-foot long spaces (even though
dimensioned at 19-foot lengths) with a 24-foot wide drive aisle. Code requires parking spaces to
be 19 feet in length.
e) Due to the building design, parking spaces 14 and 15, assuming they meet the required 19-foot
space length, do not have the required 24 feet drive aisle width (stall length and drive aisle scale
to 41 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
f) Parking spaces 19 and 30 are not provided with the required 24 feet drive aisle (stall length and
drive aisle scale to 35 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
g) The visibility triangles on the inside of the driveways are drawn incorrectly. The one leg of the
triangle is along the front property line (right-of-way line), not perpendicular to the edge of the
driveway. Revise. This should eliminate the encroachment of the building into the visibility
triangles.
h) From a building wall opening standpoint, the site plan is unclear as to what portions of the
building at ground level are open versus solid. Revising the site plan on at least Sheet C3.l and
then on building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to indicate solid walls/columns versus open
areas with building above would be helpful in understanding the relationship of the parking
garage area to the outside areas and the building elevations.
i) Likewise with the comment above, revising the building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to
indicate what portions of the walls at ground level are open versus solid would assist in
understanding the architecture of the building in relationship to the parking garage and
pedestrian/vehicular circulation. Color renderings would also assist with understanding this
relationship.
j) It is unclear the purpose of the new ramp adjacent to the building north of the pool. If for
handicap access to the pool, show the width of the sidewalk, the designated pathway to it and,
Page 2014
.
.
due to the site plan being unclear as to the location of building openings versus solid walls, and a
doorwaylbuilding opening to allow handicap passage from the parking area to the outside.
k) Since east/southeast side of the building is irregular in shape, provide dimensions to all points of
the east/southeast side of the building (not just the two locations provided) to ensure that all
points of the building are at the proposed 18-foot setback.
I) Like Comment #k above, provide a dimension from the west and north property lines to the other
closest point of the building and provide a dimension from the front property line to the closest
building point on the southwest side and the middle of the building (at dumpster staging area).
m) Proposed 6" DCV A on Sheet C5.l shown to be located, and conflicting with, a guest parking
space. Revise.
n) With existing docks being re-used for the proposed condominiums, unclear how they will be
accessed (sidewalk?). Advise/show.
0) General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. If not
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
p) Unclear why 6" vertical curbing is being used in parking garage area adjacent to parking spaces,
as there is no adjacent landscape area being protected. Revise/advise.
q) Visibility triangles must also be shown adjacent to parking that is backing out into the
Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Show visibility triangles on Sheets C3.1 and LA-I. Comply
with visibility triangle requirements.
r) Show waterfront visibility triangles at the northeast and southwest comers of the property on
Sheets C3.1 and LA-I.
s) Based on the overall building dimension for the building northeast to southwest stated on Sheet
A2 of 219'-3 Yz", revise Sheets C3.1, C4.1, C5.l and LA-l to show the building with another
angle at the northeast and southwest comers of the building, rather than the comers shown.
t) Since color renderings were not provided of the building elevations, provide greater specificity on
the building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to indicate intended color scheme, including
columns, pilasters, railings, window/door frames, facia/trim, banding, etc.
u) Front building elevations on Sheet A5 indicate that most windows (and French doors) on that
elevation will be multi-paned. Unclear why all windows aren't similarly detailed, including side
and rear elevations.
v) By architectural elevations, mansard roofs are proposed around the edges of the building, which
will have a main, flat roof. The height of 54 feet has been provided to this roof slab. Code limits
parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs to a maximum of 30 inches above the flat
roof. The proposed mansards (parapet walls) are designed at approximately 6'-8" above the main
roof slab. This additional height will need to be included as part of the request, with justification
for the increase in height. Additionally, Code allows elevator equipment rooms and like
equipment enclosures to project no more than 16 feet higher than, in this case, the main roof slab.
The application is not clear where mechanical equipment, such as air condenser units, are
proposed to be located. Concerned that the three storage rooms indicated on the roof plan are an
additional floor and do not meet the provisions of the Code. Beach by Design for this Small
Motel District also restricts residential uses to two to four stories over ground-level parking. This
appears to be, with these storage rooms, to be five stories over ground-level parking, which
would then not be in compliance with Beach by Design. Further, the elevator shafts exceed the
16 feet Code limitation (roof shown to be an approximate additional five feet). Should you desire
to retain the storage rooms, parapets/mansard and other features described, these also must be
included as part of the request, with the justification for such. Staff may not be supportive of
these height increases (not in compliance with Beach by Design). Make clear proposed heights
(from base flood elevation) on elevations and in application.
w) Building Code requires an 18-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
x) Section 3-911 states that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground (private and right-of-way). Address on Sheets C2.1 and C5.1.
y) Address/revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
Page 30! 4
.
.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Reconfigure dumpster staging area where guest parking is being eliminated.
7. Land Resources:
a) Tree survey is incomplete for lot 29, show trees on site and landscape plans.
b) Revise tree replacement cales on landscape plan if trees on lot 29 are to be removed.
c) Revise/provide prior to scheduling for CDB.
8. Fire:
a) AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER NFPA-13 BY
A STATE LICENSED CONTRACTOR WITH SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS
(before Building Construction Permit).
b) ALL BUILDING AND SITE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO ALL APPLICABLE
LOCAL CODES AND ORDINACES AND COMPLY WITH THE 2001 EDITION OF THE
FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE (before Building Construction Permit).
c) NO UNDERGROUND FIRE PROTECTION PIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED
UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING (before CDB).
d) SHOW DETAIL FOR 4" INCH WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR DOCKS AND BOAT
SLIPS, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION AND FIRE HYDRANT ON SHEET C5.l
(before CDB).
e) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt-tolerant species for ponds.
10. Communitv Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapinl!:
a) Add a few Washingtonia or Sabal palms and underplanting of shrubs on ends of building between
properties. Leave 36" minimum open space for lawn equipment access.
b) The ramp on the back of the building leading to the pool has plants shown on it in the landscape
plan.
c) The area by the entrances has nothing indicated below the palms; since this area is not indicated
as sod please clarify what is being proposed there.
d) Prior to CDB.
12. Harbor Master:
a) No problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing docks will
be retained. They are not a navigation concern in their existing configuration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon.
Page 40f 4
,"
.
.
2:50 p.m.
DRAFT Comments for AUl!:ust 14, 2003 DRC
Case: FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205,209 and 214 Brightwater Drive - Brightwater Pointe
Owners: Larry L. and Barbara S. Miller.
Applicant: Brightwater Pointe, LLC (Roland Rogers).
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ email: nestech(ci)mindspring.com).
Location: 0.34 acres on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 300 feet east of Harnden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five
feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and
reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to
pool deck), with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole
use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units, under the
provisions of Section 4-1403.
Proposed Use: Twenty (20) attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees are due prior to issuance of
building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestroorns = 1
residential unit. If 16 existing hotel/motel guestroorns, 4 residential units will be credited and the
assessment will be based on 16 new residential units. Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817.
2. Stormwater:
a) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds (before CDB).
b) The southern pond has no outfall or subdrain. How will it perc through sub drain in northern pond
(before building permit)?
c) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5 (before building permit).
3. Traffic Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles on the landscaping site plans. No structures or
landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty inches (30")
above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's Community
Development Code, Section 3-904).
b) Redesign guest parking spaces to meet required stall length of 19 feet. City will not enforce
"guest" parking if so designated.
c) Add do not enter signs per MUTCD at the egress driveway.
d) Add proper signage and pavement markings to inform the driver the direction of traffic flow for
one-way direction.
e) All regular parking spaces must meet the City's minimum dimensions for a 90 degree parking
stall and maintain a 24' drive aisle without any intrusions.
f) Handicap parking stalls and handicapped aisles must meet the City's minimum dimensions
without any intrusions (i.e. columns).
g) Show on the site plan current City standard Handicap parking stall and "sign" details i.e. $255.
Page 1 of 4
~
.
.
h) Is the radius of garage entrance and exit adequate for vehicles? Show vehicles entering and
exiting garage at it's radius.
i) Will this be a gated condominium? If so, show on the site plan the gate and console. How will
this gate be operated?
j) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
k) TIF to be determined and paid prior to e.O.
4. General Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Ductile Iron pipe must be used for fire hydrant line (Contract Specifications and Standards,
Article 41.03.C.3) and for one joint on service side of new DCV A.
b) Define where existing water line and new water main extension are located within the ROW of
Brightwater Drive. Existing and proposed pipelines are shown using the same line symbol and
line weight. Use different line weights so that existing and proposed lines can be differentiated.
c) 6"x6" tee w/6"x2" reducer not required for the domestic water line. City will tap the water main
to set the meter. All applicable fees to paid by the applicant.
d) Need to core existing manhole for sanitary sewer connection.
e) Need to relocate the new sanitary manhole to within the ROW of Brightwater Drive.
f) What are the new 6" sanitary line and clean out going to serve? Pool, pump, etc. cannot be
connected to the sanitary system.
g) Are these condominiums? If so, plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit.
h) Address prior to scheduling for CDB.
5. Planninl!:
a) The "Description of Request" and all appropriate criteria, as part of Exhibit "A," must include
and address an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (or whatever the proposed
height is to be - see also Comment "v" below) and a reduction of the rear (east) setback from 20
feet to 18 feet (to building).
b) The application is requesting the approval to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way. Two of these spaces are less than the required 19 feet stall length, thereby
having a portion of the spaces within the right-of-way, which is no different than some existing
conditions along Brightwater Drive and not allowed by Code. Assuming that the parking spaces
can be redesigned to meet required stall length, Staff may not support this portion of the request.
c) Based on the site design on Sheet C3.l, it is unclear why the 4 'x8' shed in the northeast comer of
the property is not being removed. Revise Sheet C2.1 or C3.1 appropriately.
d) Assuming the submitted drawings are drawn to scale, the inside dimension of the parking portion
of the building scales to only 61 feet across, providing for two 18-foot long spaces (even though
dimensioned at 19-foot lengths) with a 24-foot wide drive aisle. Code requires parking spaces to
be 19 feet in length.
e) Due to the building design, parking spaces 14 and 15, assuming they meet the required 19- foot
space length, do not have the required 24 feet drive aisle width (stall length and drive aisle scale
to 41 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
f) Parking spaces 19 and 30 are not provided with the required 24 feet drive aisle (stall length and
drive aisle scale to 35 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
g) The visibility triangles on the inside of the driveways are drawn incorrectly. The one leg of the
triangle is along the front property line (right-of-way line), not perpendicular to the edge of the
driveway. Revise. This should eliminate the encroachment of the building into the visibility
triangles.
h) From a building wall opening standpoint, the site plan is unclear as to what portions of the
building at ground level are open versus solid. Revising the site plan on at least Sheet C3.1 and
then on building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to indicate solid walls/columns versus open
areas with building above would be helpful in understanding the relationship of the parking
garage area to the outside areas and the building elevations.
i) Likewise with the comment above, revising the building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to
indicate what portions of the walls at ground level are open versus solid would assist in
understanding the architecture of the building in relationship to the parking garage and
pedestrian/vehicular circulation. Color renderings would also assist with understanding this
relationship.
Page 2 of4
.
.
j) It is unclear the purpose of the new ramp adjacent to the building north of the pool. If for
handicap access to the pool, show the width of the sidewalk, the designated pathway to it and,
due to the site plan being unclear as to the location of building openings versus solid walls, and a
doorway/building opening to allow handicap passage from the parking area to the outside.
k) Since east/southeast side of the building is irregular in shape, provide dimensions to all points of
the east/southeast side of the building (not just the two locations provided) to ensure that all
points of the building are at the proposed 18-foot setback.
1) Like Comment #k above, provide a dimension from the west and north property lines to the other
closest point of the building and provide a dimension from the front property line to the closest
building point on the southwest side and the middle of the building (at dumpster staging area).
m) Proposed 6" DCV A on Sheet C5.1 shown to be located, and conflicting with, a guest parking
space. Revise.
n) With existing docks being re-used for the proposed condominiums, unclear how they will be
accessed (sidewalk?). Advise/show.
0) General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. If not
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
p) Unclear why 6" vertical curbing is being used in parking garage area adjacent to parking spaces,
as there is no adjacent landscape area being protected. Revise/advise.
q) Visibility triangles must also be shown adjacent to parking that is backing out into the
Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Show visibility triangles on Sheets C3.1 and LA-I. Comply
with visibility triangle requirements.
r) Show waterfront visibility triangles at the northeast and southwest corners of the property on
Sheets C3.1 and LA-I.
s) Based on the overall building dimension for the building northeast to southwest stated on Sheet
A2 of 219'-3 !ti", revise Sheets C3.1, C4.1, C5.1 and LA-l to show the building with another
angle at the northeast and southwest corners of the building, rather than the corners shown.
t) Since color renderings were not provided of the building elevations, provide greater specificity on
the building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to indicate intended color scheme, including
columns, pilasters, railings, window/door frames, facia/trim, banding, etc.
u) Front building elevations on Sheet A5 indicate that most windows (and French doors) on that
elevation will be multi-paned. Unclear why all windows aren't similarly detailed, including side
and rear elevations.
v) By architectural elevations, mansard roofs are proposed around the edges of the building, which
will have a main, flat roof. The height of 54 feet has been provided to this roof slab. Code limits
parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs to a maximum of 30 inches above the flat
roof. The proposed mansards (parapet walls) are designed at approximately 6'-8" above the main
roof slab. This additional height will need to be included as part of the request, with justification
for the increase in height. Additionally, Code allows elevator equipment rooms and like
equipment enclosures to project no more than 16 feet higher than, in this case, the main roof slab.
The application is not clear where mechanical equipment, such as air condenser units, are
proposed to be located. Concerned that the three storage rooms indicated on the roof plan are an
additional floor and do not meet the provisions of the Code. Beach by Design for this Small
Motel District also restricts residential uses to two to four stories over ground-level parking. This
appears to be, with these storage rooms, to be five stories over ground-level parking, which
would then not be in compliance with Beach by Design. Further, the elevator shafts exceed the
16 feet Code limitation (roof shown to be an approximate additional five feet). Should you desire
to retain the storage rooms, parapets/mansard and other features described, these also must be
included as part of the request, with the justification for such. Staff may not be supportive of
these height increases (not in compliance with Beach by Design). Make clear proposed heights
(from base flood elevation) on elevations and in application.
w) Building Code requires an 18-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
x) Section 3-911 states that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
Page 3 of 4
.
.
.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground (private and right-of-way). Address on Sheets C2.1 and C5.1.
y) Address/revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Need to discuss.
7. Land Resources:
a) Tree survey is incomplete for lot 29, show trees on site and landscape plans.
b) Revise tree replacement cales on landscape plan if trees on lot 29 are to be removed.
c) Revise/provide prior to scheduling for CDB.
8. Fire:
a) AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER NFPA-13 BY
A STATE LICENSED CONTRACTOR WITH SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS
(before Building Construction Permit).
b) ALL BUILDING AND SITE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO ALL APPLICABLE
LOCAL CODES AND ORDINACES AND COMPLY WITH THE 2001 EDITION OF THE
FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE (before Building Construction Permit).
c) NO UNDERGROUND FIRE PROTECTION PIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED
UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING (before CDB).
d) SHOW DETAIL FOR 4" INCH WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR DOCKS AND BOAT
SLIPS, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION AND FIRE HYDRANT ON SHEET C5.1
(before CDB).
e) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt-tolerant species for ponds.
10. Communitv ResDonse:
a) No comments.
11. LandscaDine::
a) Add a few Washingtonia or Sabal palms and underplanting of shrubs on ends of building between
properties. Leave 36" minimum open space for lawn equipment access.
b) The ramp on the back of the building leading to the pool has plants shown on it in the landscape
plan.
c) The area by the entrances has nothing indicated below the palms, since this area is not indicated
as sod please clarify what is being proposed there.
12. Harbor Master:
a) No problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing docks will
be retained. They are not a navigation concern in their existing configuration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon.
Page 4 of 4
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rice, Scott
Monday, August 04, 2003 1 :57 PM
Wells, Wayne
Brightwater Sidewalks
Wayne
Section 3.1907 of the Redevelopment Code requires a 4-foot sidewalk for local roads. Therefore, we should be requiring a
4-foot sidewalk for the developments on Brightwater Drive.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
srice@clearwater-fl.com
1
'Jlf:J
.
.
CITY OF
,.;--;
fU)l~-d~O(,7
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4800 FAX (727) 562-4825
PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
August 1, 2003
~iS
-", C~///J
P{,q .. (I l2'D
c 1)>-. !\lilt Iq . . <17'()i J
I, Y lif/(~ J
0,"" j....",
1". "" ., ....,.,f...,~ "~')
-" 'd'"''
Brightwater Pointe, 205, 209 and 214 Brightwater Dr., FLD2003-06027 '--(tSq;c~f?/;tt
Redevelopment-Replace 3 existing motels (16 guestrooms) with 20 unit condominium . 'V1tq/l2"~'V1
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services
601 Cleveland St., Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re:
DearMr~ H~h
~
According to the current Recreation and Open Space Land Dedication Ordinance, the above referenced project
will be required to satisfy the Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facilities dedication requirement
prior to issuance of any building permits or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first.
In order to determine the amount owed, the developer or representative should complete the top portion of the
attached form and return it to the City of Clearwater Parks and Recreation Department with verification of the
just value for the land only according to the current year's property tax assessment.
Please note, this dedication requirement could be a substantial amount and an impact to your project.
Therefore, we encourage you to contact me at 562-4817 as soon as possible to estimate the assessment and to
answer any questions.
Sincerely,
LLL~) !0.'C_-~
Deborah W. Richter
Management Analyst
Attachment: Open Space/Recreation Impact Worksheet
Code of Ordinances, Chapter 54, Recreation and Open Space Land Dedication
cc: Art Kader, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director
Lisa Fierce, Assistant Planning Director
Robert Hays, Development Services Coordinator
Roland Rogers, Brightwater Pointe, LLC, P.O. Box 676, Crystal Beach, FL 34681
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
~ MEMORANDUJl
.
To:
From:
Re:
Date:
DRC Members W
Wayne Wells, Planning Department W y\It
FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003, 205, 209 & 214 Brightwater Drive
July 31,2003
We apologize for any inconvenience, however, the wrong plans were routed to your for the
above project, scheduled for the DRC Case Review meeting on Monday, August 4, 2003, and for
the DRC meeting on August 14,2003. The correct plans are attached for your review.
Please throw out the prior plans, application and supporting material routed to you, as
there are major differences between these submissions.
. .
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
A.o~.003 - O(,O~7
Case No. /LJ/€ ~oo:3 - O~ DO 3 Meeting Date: p- / 7"'"- c;)DO .3
fr
D Active Code Enforcement Case @ yes:
D Address number Gi;) (no) (vacant land)
D Landscaping@ (no)
D Overgrown (yes) (@)
D Debris (yes) ~
D Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) ~
D Building(s) ~(fair) (poor) (vacant land)
D FenCing~oOd) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
D Paint ~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
D Grass Parking (yes@
D Residential Parking Violations (yes) @
D Signage ~ (ok) (not ok) (billboard)
D Parking (n/a) ~ (handicapped) (needs repaving)
D Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed)
D Outdoor storage (yes)@
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Date: "7 (.311-? Reviewed by: < L " : j) " '"~ Telephone: ,)~ t..;J - 'I7<~ 0
Revised 03- 9-01; 02-04-03 --
. .
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
~LLJ ~ 003-0&:>0.;;2 7
Case No. TZJ/2,;). OW -() t:no_~ Meeting Date: R-/v-o~~
Location: R09 :;;;j5ryA. -f-u.Jo 7~ Dr.
o Current Use:
o Active Code Enforcement Case@yes:
o Address number (yes) (no) (vacant land)
o Landscaping (yes) (no)
o Overgrown (yes) (no)
o Debris (yes) (no)
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (no)
o Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing ~(good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
o Paint ~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes) @
o Residential Parking Violations (yes) ~
o signag~ (ok) (not ok) (billboard)
o Parking@(striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) 9rauc/ ?a,rK/~
o Dumpster (enclosed)~enclose~
o Outdoor storage (yes) @>])
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Date:7/d'lfl Reviewed by:( leu',
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 --
(~ '
, J p-L,/~Ielephone: 0~':> -L/;;<3()
.
.
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
~L 0.,.)003- OleD;;2 '7
Case No. Meeting Date: cP -j ?-~ ~ 00--3
Location: oJ / '-j
6rj-' A j- ((. j~ .f7:eT
"Or.
D Current Use:
D Active Code Enforcement Case @yes:
D Address number~ (no) (vacant land)
D Landscaping @ (no)
D Overgrown (yes) ~
D Debris (yes) ~
D Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) ~
D Building(s) ~ (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
D FenCing~~(9oOd) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
D Paint B (fair) (poor) (garish)
D Grass Parking (yes) <C62D 9,--aue / /a,):::.J ~/1 CJ
D Residential Parking Violations (yes) ~
D Signag~ (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ,
D Parking@(striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ~r~ jJ/Qr/LJFL3
D Dumpster (enclOSed~c1osed)=>
D Outdoor storage (yes~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Date: ?1?~~Reviewed bY:ci-u1',L).1 ;'-1 't?~Telephone: Ji~? ~ L/ :?dO
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 --,
.
P~nellas County Property APp.r Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 OW
Page 2 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0270
30-Jul-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:03:26
Ownership InforMation Residential Property Address. Use. and Sales
HILLER. LARRY J
HIL L ER. BARBARA S
214 BRIGHTWATER DR ~ 4
CLEARWATER FL 33761-
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 205 BRIGHTWATER DR
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t: 260.02
sales froM 2000 - 2001:
551.400 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 1 /2.002 11. 169/2. 394 440.000 (U) I
1951: Book 021 Pgs 032-033 0 /1.913 4.020/ 21 82.500 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1.912 3.892/ 363 5.000 (0) u
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1.911 3.661/ 864 59.500 (0) I
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Jus t / Marke t: 454.400 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 454.400 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t: 0
Taxable: 454.400 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0
2002 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CW Seawall: YES Frontage: Canal/River
Clearwater View:
02 Mi llage : 23.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price units Meth
02 Taxes: 10.583.48
1) 91 x 110 5.600.00 91. 43 F
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
10.583.48 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 416.161
2002 taxes will be :
10.583.48
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 2 LOT 21
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b=1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p=... 7130/2003
. Pj1ellas Cou
08
30-Jul-2
Resident
Il"'Ip Type
Foundati
Floor Sy
Exterior
Roof Fra
Roof Cov
** Storie
Floor Fi
Interior
1) Base
2) Open
3)
4)
5)
6)
Descr
1) ASPHA
2) DOCK
3) PATIO
4) SPA /J
5) BT LF
6)
Map With
~~
http://pao.co.
nty Property APp.er Information: 08 29 150493200001
Page 3 of5
/ 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0270
:01
003 Jil"'l Sl"'Iith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:03:26
ial Card 01 of 1 Prop Use: 220 Land Use: 08 Living Units: 4
: Hult Res Apt <4 St Prop Address: 205 BRIGHTWATER DR
s 1.0
nish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr
Finish Drywall/Plaster
on
stel"'l
Wall
l"'Ie
er
Structural
Elements
Continuous Wall
Slab on Grade
ConcBk Stucco/Reclad
Gable-Hip
COfflposite Shingle
Quality
Year Built
Effecti ve Age
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
Econonol"'lic Depreciation
Ave rage
1. 954
35
Central Duct
Cooling (Central)
15
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Factor Area Description Factor Area
1. 00 2.712 7) .00 0
.30 90 8) .00 0
.00 0 9) .00 0
.00 0 10) .00 0
.00 0 11) .00 0
.00 0 12) .00 0
Description
Area
Po rch
iption
LT
/DECK
AC/HT
T/DAU
Residential Extra Features
o il"'lens ions Price Units Value RCD Year
4X250 .00 1. 000 0 0 999
392SF 10.00 392 0 2.780 1. 970
BLK .00 1 0 0 1.999
PORT .00 1 0 0 1. 999
MANUAL 500.00 2 0 1.000 1.960
.00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VA LU E : 3.780
Property Address (non-vacant)
[fJ[f]g]g]
pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o= 1 &a= l&b= 1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p=... 7/3012003
I .
Pjnellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
Page 4 of5
~.... L.. '- ,-",' ..... V Ii'-'" I l:'- r\
it;.'
:::R 180
BRIGH1W/-I1ER
DR'
/
l 19D .i
/BR IGH1W'A 1 Et-
DR I
, I
/
181 I
lTWA 1ERI186 I'
DR Gf;' I dH1WA 1 ~8: i
/ ~I ~HT~.L\.1 F93 /
I OgR .:iH1W.AI~~.
/ ~/t3Ht'&'(!, TftF.'
DR I .........
/ 201.,j,. \ ':l08--------
BF1'IGH6W11 [~O~IGHc..n\fA1
9'R IGH~P;~ ER DR
R
r-::: ~ -I
04968
L r- _..-l
.I
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?0=I&a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p=... 7/3012003
P~\lellas County Property APpler Information: 08 29 150493200001
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
BaGkJQS~a[GhPag~
An_explanation of this screen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/30/2003
~inellas County Property APp.r Information: 08 291504932000 OW
Page 2 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0280
30-Jul-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:08:44
Ownership InforMation Residential Property Add ress. Use. and Sales
HILLER. LAURENCE J
HIl L ER. BARBARA S
214 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4
CLEARWATER FL 33767-
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 209 BRIGHTWATER DR
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 260.02
sales froM 2000 - 2001:
453.200 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 6 /2.000 10.934/1. 141 500.000 (Q) I
1951: Book 027 Pgs 032-033 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Jus t / Marke t: 420.000 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 420.000 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 420.000 Agricultural: 0
2002 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
D is t r ic t: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Clearwater View:
02 Mi llage : 23.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price units Meth
02 Taxes: 9.782.26
1) 91 x 110 5.600.00 91. 43 F
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) o x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
9.782.26 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 476.167
2002 taxes will be :
9.782.26
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 2 LOT 28
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/30/2003
~inellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
Page 3 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0280
:01
30-Jul-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:08:41
Residential Card 01 of 1 Prop Use: 222 Land Use: 08 Living units: 6
IMp Type: Hult Res Apt <4 St Prop Address: 209 BRI6HTWATER DR
Structural
Elemen.ts
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Roof FraMe
Roof Cover
Continuous Wall
Slab on 6 rade
ConcBk Stucco/Reclad
Flat-Shed
B U Tar&6ravel/Othr
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Heating Unit/Spc/WI/FI
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Ave rage
1. 962
25
Furn
None
18
o
o
o
# Stories 2.0
Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr
Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster
Sub
Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base A rea 1. 00 1. 876 7) .00 0
2) Utility .55 216 8) .00 0
3) Open Po rch .30 530 9) .00 0
4) Uppe r St ry Base A rea .90 1. 876 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Residen.tial Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) DOCK 400SF 15.00 400 0 2.400 1. 970
2) PATIO/DECK 400 2.50 400 0 400 1.970
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VA LU E: 2.800
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o=l&a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p=... 7/3012003
finellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 01
I
) l
V,lI.TER /
( l I ~;jO /
/BRIGH6~.A To/
I I
l
I
I
JI8S I
HTWA 1tg I
ctfu I ~irrt b!l T t rt 3 _1
I DeR~GHTw,a yEg....
, ! Db' L T,:;I:::1 .J.. DR
/ BR ,'l:iHTV\fA T ~R ............
/ DR l 0;::.(1 I I -.......
8~GH6~~If[~O RIG~-f:AT
I fiPIGHTW,6\IERCP
l DR \
CLEARWATER
R
- :-l
\ 04868
L- -r- -~
/
Page 4 of5
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o=l&a=l&b= 1 &c=I&r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p=... 7/30/2003
finellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/30/2003
..
Pine!las County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
Page 20[5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0290
30-Jul-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:15:22
Ownership InforMation Residential Property Add ress. Use. and Sales
HIL L ER. LAURENCE J
HILLER. BARBARA S
10 E LOCH llOYD PKI.rJY
BEl TON HO 64012-
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 214 BRIGHTI.rJATER DR
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 260. OZ
sales froM 2000 - 2001:
483.000 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMP
Plat InforMation 11/1.985 6.115/ liZ6 265.000 (Q) I
1951: Book OZ 7 Pgs 032-033 0 /1.970 3.320/ 598 78.000 (U) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 400.000 HOMestead: 25.000 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 400.000 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 375.000 Agricul tural: 0
2002 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CI.rJ Seawall: YES Frontage: Bay
Clearwater View:
02 Mi llage : 23.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 8.734.16
1) 91 x 110 5.600.00 91. 43 F
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
8.734.16 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 476.167
2002 taxes will be :
9.316.44
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 2 LOT 29
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbinlcgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/3012003
Pine!las County Property APp.er Information: 08 29150493200001
Page 3 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0290 :01
30-Jul-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:15:Z5
Res iden t ial Card 0 I 0 f I Prop Use: Z Z Z Land Use: 08 L i v ing Un i ts: 6
IMP Type: Mult Res Apt <4 St Prop Address: ZI4 BRIOHTWATER DR
Structural
Elements
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Roof FraMe
Roof Cover
Continuous Wall
Slab on 0 rade
ConcBk Stucco/Reclad
Flat-Shed
B U Tar&Oravel/Othr
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Ave rage
1.959
Z5
Central Duct
Cooling (Central)
18
o
o
o
~ Stories Z.O
Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr
Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster
Sub
Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 1,9ZZ 7) Uppe r St ry Base A rea .90 1.876
2) Base Semi Finished .85 138 8) .00 0
3) Utility .55 16Z 9) .00 0
4) Enclosed Po rch .80 IZO 10) .00 0
5) Open Porch .30 500 11) .00 0
6) Utility .40 54 12) .00 0
Residential Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) SHUFBDCT 31ZSF 300.00 I 0 300 999
2) DOCK 440SF 15.00 440 0 Z,640 1. 970
3) PATIO/DECK ZOISF 7.50 ZOI 0 600 1. 970
4) DOCK IOX30 10.00 300 0 Z,040 1. 991
5) PATIO/DECK 6XZ3 10.00 138 0 1,100 1,995
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6,680
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.flus/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p=... 7/30/2003
Pinellas County Property APpler Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 01
Page 4 of5
I.
II
,
CLEARWi~ TER
~()
I
j I
(oil, T f1~ I !
RI~HT\~J\T/tftl3
I D~R}GH1W'Al ~~9 , BRIGH~A R
/ ~~ K; HTW,A T FtR -..,.....'
/ OR .r 201 \ ~-.......
l Bl~I~HTUi/' ER 209
! ,b DR~I 20~RI GHTW,A.1
~I GH1WA\T ER DR
I' DR \
I
/
[R / 19D I
/BRI(JH1V\fA TEl<
DR /
/
/
'J~
200 .I
'y' $IDr:-/
DR 72'06 /
B,JIY510E.I i
/ DR l~1 0 / r--.: - :-I
~ ~iA \t]D~/:;:lI? n /', <) C (;,)
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbinlcgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/30/2003
Pinellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 01
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7130/2003
,
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September
16, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests:
NOTE: All persons wishine to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine. Those cases that
are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neiehborine property owners. etc. will be placed on a consent aeenda and
approved bv a sinele vote at the beeinnine of the meetine.
1. Richard Cope / CMT Holdine. Ltd. are requesting a flexible development approval to rmit a non-residential parking lot
within the HDR District with reduction in the front (east) setback along S. Hercules Ave e from 25 feet to 15 feet (to
pavement) and to reduce the fro (south) setback along ulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to feet (to existing pavement)
and reduce the front (west) setbac long Aurora Avenue fr 25 feet to 3 feet (to existing paveme (Proposed Use: A non-
res' ential parking lot in association ith an existing office de lopment) and the side (south) setback m 10 feet to three feet
(to p vement), under the provisions 0 Section 2-703.1 and the 'de (south) setback from 10 feet to thre feet (to pavement),
under e provisions of Section 2-703.1 1988 Gulf-to-Bav Blv Sec. 13-29-15, M&B 24.07 and part 0 Sky Crest Unit 7
Blk C, r..; t 5. FLD2003-06031
2. Clearwa r Retail Grou Ltd. are reques' g an Amendment to pr ious approvals for signage: 1) Cases D 02-02-
06A/SGN200 02009 - Conditions 1 and 2 whic requires that the final de . n, height, area, color, etc. of signs be nsistent
with the drawin submitted to, or as modified by e CDB, and that the sign or future tenants of the retail center h e the
same background d text colors as approved by the DB, as part of a Compreh sive Sign Program, under the provisio of
Section 3-1807; an 2) Case FLD2003-05023 - ndition 2 requiring that II signage comply with the approv
Comprehensive Sign rogram application FLD 02-0 -06A/SGN2003-02009.. ( posed Use: An amendment to a
Comprehensive Sign Pro ram for Amscot Financial, Inc. [9 South Missouri Avenue)) 922 South Missouri Ave., Sec. 22-
29-15, M&B 21.01. SGN 03-08001
3. Robert W. and Donna L. eStefano (Anthony Menna) are re uesting a flexible developme
dwellings with reductions of t side (east) setback from 10 feet 3.8 feet (to building) and m 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the si (west) setback from 10 feet to . feet (to building) and fro 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear ( uth) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet to building), from 20 feet to .6 feet (to pools) and
om 20 feet to zero feet (to board Ik) and with an increase of buildin height from 35 feet to 40.3 feet, and to permit
pa ing that is designed to back into t public right-of-way, as part of a Co rehensive Infill Redevelop t Project, under
the p visions of Section 2-803.C (retain g three existing boat slips and existin dock for sole use by the prope owners) and
Prelim ary Plat approval for six lots. (Pr osed Use: Six attached dwellings [to homes)) at 125 Bri htwater r., Bayside
Sub No. Lots 7 & 8. FLD2003-06030/PL 2003-00004
4. Gar and ar A. erni an (Anthony Menn are requesting a flexible development proval to permit attached dw ings
with reductions f the side (east) setbacks from 1 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 0 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the ide (west) setbacks from 10 feet 0 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 et to nine feet (to pavement),
reductions of the re (north) setback from 20 feet to .2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 1 feet (to pools) and from 20
feet to zero feet (to b rdwalk) and with an increase of b 'Iding height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into tH public right-of-way, as part of a prehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retainin four existing boat slips and two cks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat
approval for six lots. (Pro sed Use: Six attached dwellings wnhomes)) at 116-120 Briehtwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 53 & 54 FLD2003-07 2/PL T2003-00006
(j)Larrv L. and Barbara S. Miller / Briehtwater Pointe. LLC (Roland Rogers) are requesting a flexible development
approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement),
reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to
five feet (to pavement) and reductions ,of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero
feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), with increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six
feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof deck for open gazebos) and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole use by the property owners) and the
Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403
..
.
.
(Proposed Use: Twenty (20) attached dwellings [condominiums]) at 205. 209 & 214 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 27, 28 & 29. FLD2003-06027rrDR2003-06003
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning
Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to
any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the
Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify,
present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests.
An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be
recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to
three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of
time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by
interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100
S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss
any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093.
Ad: 08/31/03
G T LEISURE CORP
181 BRIGHTWATERDR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402
e
REAGAN, MARGO H TRE
307 ORANGEWOOD LN
LARGO FL 33770 - 4077
.L.ll ~vo3-t)6Cbl-7
LENART, DIANE TRE
8542 1/2 LAWRENCE
CHICAGO IL 60706 - 2956
LANGIEWICZ, JANUSZ LANGIEWICZ, JANUSZ LANGIEWICZ, JANUSZ
LANGIEWICZ, JANINA LANGIEWICZ, JANINA LANGIEWICZ, JANINA
31 STONERIDGE DR 31 STONERIDGE DR 31 STONERIDGE DR S
BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9593 SOUTH BARRINGTON IL 60010 - BARRINGTON IL 60010-
MILLER, LARRY J MILLER, LAURENCE J MILLER, LAURENCE J
MILLER, BARBARA S MILLER, BARBARA S MILLER, BARBARA S
10 E LOCH LLOYD PKWY 10 E LOCH LLOYD PKWY 214 BRIGHTW ATER DR
BELTON MO 64012 - BELTON MO 64012 - 4106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2427
BRINSON, FRANK C BRIGHTWATER TOWNHOMES BRIGHTWATER TOWNHOMES
BRINSON, VENIE W 163 BAYSIDE DR 163 BAYSIDE DR
210 BRIGHTW ATER DR CLEARWATERFL 33767- CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2426
LE CLERC, ROBERT W FLAMINGO BAY RESORT INC KOEGLER, WALTER A
LE CLERC, LORETTA M 184 BRIGHTW ATER DR # 2 KOEGLER, JEAN A
2247 OVERBROOK AVE N CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2410 135 BRIGHTW ATER DR
LARGO FL 33770 - 2077 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2402
SUNNWAVES INC MARSZALEK, ROMAN BRIGHTW ATER ON THE BAY
170 BRIGHTW ATER DR crus, MIECZYSLA W INC
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401 166 BRIGHTW A TER DR 175 BRIGHTW ATER DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2411
LENEART, RENEE TRE LENEART, RENEE TRE LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925 CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925 CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
CADDICK, JACK W TRE
70 CHERRYRD
KINGSTON RI 02881 - 1702
MILLER, GERALD R
178 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767-
ANAST ASOPOULOS,
ANAST ASIOS
ANAST ASOPOULOS, MARIA
246 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503
HLEPAS, PETER
HLEPAS, TOULA
4859 N AUSTIN AVE
CHICAGO IL 60630 - 1962
PLOCH, MARK C
222 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2503
e
JONES, C GRETCHEN
181 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502
KIRKPATRICK, ROBERT M
KIRKP A TRICK, CHRISTINE L
182 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
DONOVAN, TPATRICK
DONOVAN, CAROLYN
200 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
JANAKAS, TED
212 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503
FALLER, LISA M
228 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503
e
MC MULLIN, JOSEPHINE TRE
174 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
GULATI, DUSHY ANT K
186 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
O'BRIEN, LAWRENCE E
O'BRIEN, PATRICIA
95 DIXWELL AVE
QUINCY MA 02169-
DAS, MARIN
RASKIN, DORA
216 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503
JOHNSON, MATILDA S TRE
232 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503
DECADE PROPERTIES INC CZYZEWSKI, EDNA RUPPEL, CHRISTIAN D
250PATRICKBLVD STE 140 SCHAPPEL,THEODORE RUPPEL, CHRISTINE R
BROOKFIELD WI 53045 - 5826 250 BA YSIDE DR 256 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503
RIGGlE, ELLINOR M GATZIOLIS, SHIRLEY M TRE MERCURlS, CHERYLR
262 BA YSIDE DR 407 FRANKLIN AVE # 5-E 201 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2503 SOUTH CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2504
RIVER FOREST IL 60305 - 1745
KATSOURAKIS, ZOE BALLA, SHEMZI UNGER, ANNE E
KA TSOURAKIS, ETHEL N BALLA, SABRIJE BILLING, DA VID R
287 PARK DR 215 BAYSIDE DR 227 BA YSIDE DR
CAMPBELL OH 44405 -1259 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504
REID, YOLANDA F TZEKAS, IMER TZEKAS, ENVER
223 BA YSIDE DR TZEKAS, BETIJE TZEKAS, SAIDE B
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504 231 BA YSIDE DR 235 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504
CAMPANE, ANTHONY G TRE KIMPTON, WILLIAM J NABORS, JOHN M
259 BA YSIDE DR KIMPTON, JOAN C NABORS, SUSAN M
CLEARW ATER FL 33767 - 2504 265 BA YSIDE DR 271 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2504
BEYAZIT, FERIDE T
275 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504
TZEKAS, RABIJE TRE
245 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504
Housh Ghavaee
Northside Engineering Services
601 Cleveland St. #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
e
GREGORY, KATHERINE TRE
249 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504
Clearwater Beach Association
Pres. David MacNamee
827 Mandalay Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33767
e
TZEKAS, RAIM
TZEKAS, DZEZIJE
255 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2504
Brightwater Pointe, LLC
Attn: Roland Rogers
P.O. Box 676
Crystal Beach, FL 34681
..
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
S eo- Ra.",~~."""" \\.\\.v- ...~\ \ fy-'04
~ ~6~ c.:~.\
September 18, 2003
SQ.Q.. ~\J''''- ~~ L.-~A V;)...,/o~
JWo..c.. W~ "" C ~ .t
\N)J
~
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205, 209 and 214
Brightwater Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front
(west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet
(to pavement) and reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), and increases of building height from 35
feet to 54 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets)
and 16 feet (from roof deck for open gazebos), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four
existing docks for sole use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for
three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403. The
Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases
and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILLjONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT Ai\lD AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
September 18, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Two
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks, lift and/or slips be for the exclusive use by the residents
and/or guests of the condominiums and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the
condominiums;
3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
4. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits;
5. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
6. That two "guest" parking spaces be provided and designed to avoid backing into the right-of-
way and the two spaces comply with City Code, and revised plans be submitted to the
Planning Department by September 30,2003, reflecting this change;
7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the site plan be revised to indicate all corners of the
proposed building meeting the required front setback of 15 feet;
8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, conflicts between proposed utility lines and
landscaping be resolved;
9. That the site and landscape plans be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to curb all
edges of pavement for the protection of landscaped areas;
10. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy;
11. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy;
12. That prior to the issuance of any permits drainage drawdown calculations be submitted or an
equalizer be provided between the ponds, acceptable to the Engineering Department; and
13. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold
from 130 Brightwater Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the
issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed also must contain a
covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of 130 Brightwater Drive due to the transfer of
development rights.
The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the Flexible Development request to
permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C application with the
following bases:
Bases for Denial:
1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sections 2-803.C;
2. The proposal does not meet the purposes of the Community Development Code (Section 1-
103);
"... .,'
September 18, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Three
3. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
4. The proposal is incompatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on October 2,2003 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiPending caseslUp for the next CDBIBrightwater 205 Brightwater PointelBrightwater 205
Development Order. doc