The URL can be used to link to this page

LUZ2004-03002 CL WCoverSheet . . L UZ2004-03002 2025 N HIGHLAND AVE Date Received: 03/02/2004 BAYSHORE BROADWAY.. INC. ZONING DISTRICT: MHDR LAND USE: RH ATLAS PAGE: 252A PLANNER OF RECORD: MTP , . . ; F 1,1. E City of Clearwater Lv1.,Wt[:. tJ)fX){; Application for Comprehensive Land Plan Amendment Project Name: Highland Avenue Redevelopment Plan February 27.2004 Applicant: Bayshore/Broadway, Inc. 221 Turner Street Clearwater, Fl. 33756 Representative( s): Alex J. Panik, PE Alex J. Panik, P.E., P.A. Consulting Engineer 39326 US Highway 19 N. Tarpon Springs, Fl. 34689 and Thomas Wilkey Project Engineer: Alex J. Panik, PE Alex J. Panik, P.E., P.A. Consulting Engineer 39326 US Highway 19 N. Tarpon Springs, Fl. 34689 . . Table of Submittals Application for Comprehensive Land Plan Amendment Project Name: Highland Avenue Redevelopment Plan 1. Application 2. Sealed Survey (Legal description) 3. Affidavit to Authorize Agent 4. Copy of Deed and Title Insurance Policy 5. Project Narrative includes: a. An assessment of the impacts of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities, the environment, community character and the fiscal condition of the City b. Information that demonstrates that the proposed amendment complies with certain standards. c. Names the corporation that has a contractual interest in the property · CITY OF CLEARWfrER APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (INCLUDING FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT) PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNERS, ?:GENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME: ~s. ~ L-rxln.~vJ~ ::tn(. MAILING ADDRESS: 1...1-. \ '\J( t..91 ~" Q.~I . R- ~~ .Sb PHONE NUMBER: ., t, , '"'\"\~. \ \\""\~ FAX NUMBER:\.1... J. "'''\C\,. \ \\'\b PROPERTY OWNERS: \-~C)~A ~ \Jv."1 C\'rt.~,....) (List all owners) AGENTNAME:k~ ~~..:)\'~ ~~ 'W\\,.'l.t, ()( <;~~ \J~'&i:tL MAILING ADDRESS: ~~ ~1....:b ~)S ~~ ~ ""'., i>O~ ~,~ ,R-, ~,-)fl PHONE NUMBER: I"L". ~~ '\ ,S\ LO FAX NUMBER: \1...,. ~ 3>~ · " \ , ~ SITE INFORMATION: ~ LOCATION: ~\(t~\"~~~ b~ ~Ol y.. STREET ADDRESS: "'l..d-\ ~ )1..0"\ <; \\ \Ct \\.\..J)~ ~ t\~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ ~ \f~(..:~~~ PARCEL NUMBER QzJ:L'1J\S \~OOOl)b)z> I~oo + ( ~M'.OI -\- (CY,OC:J SIZE OF SITE: ~ ,,,\ a.c../t.-. s. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: PRESENT REQUESTED: ~ \-\- ~I M~1X2.. R ~ wi ~~\1< tDo\'3 FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: PRESENT: ---I< L A€ REQUESTED: PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT: (use additional paper if necessary) I (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to th est of my/(our) knowledge. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF P~LLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this :; S . day of by ~\~f'\'Cb-~~ ,A.~~~~v~ to me persf)IIY known has produced '("'" J~<; Lc~v-.S~ as identification. /~~'f~""" Margaret J. Savage t*.f"~~;~ MY COMMISSION # 00034477 EXP.IIlES '..;;.,Jil!!k..ir.,= October 18, 2005 '~r..;ff,.~<J BONDED THRU TroY FAIN INsuRANCF,tHC. Notary public, my commission expires: ~ , 02/19/2084 11:53 72744795. BILL WITTER . PAGE 02 . CTIY OF CLEARWATER AFFIDAVIT TO AUlHORIZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION . MUNJCIPAL SERVICES BUItmNC. 100 SOUTH MYRTI.E A WNUE. 2- FLOOR PIlONE (727)-562-4561 FAX (/27) 56H576 Leonard Chatkin Marv CbetJ<in (Nant8 or.. ~~) 1. That (I a~) the owner(s) and record tiOe hotder(s) of the following described property: 4.4 acres (moll..Qn.J:::l.jgb Avenue in Clearwat~r Pin~countv I=lnrirl~ See x I it A attached for Legal Descri(!tion (AddnIIIl orG8nlnl LoclIIon) 2. That this p~ COOSltltutes the property for Which a request for a: Comprehensive Land Use Change Petition of Annexation Zonina Atlas Am~no~nt {Nl!ItIn of.....,..q 3. That the underslg~ave) appointed ~) appoint Geoffrev Wetjer. Thomas Wil~v. or Alex.Panic .. (h/8IIIeIl) 1118ft1(a) to ...... tIIlV"'" or Cle..- daeument8 I~~ tv tlr8c:tladl plIIlkJn; " 4. That this affidavit has been exeQJted to Induce the City of ClearWater. Florida to consider and act on the above desaibed property; 5. That oB" the undersigned authority, hereby certify th STATE OF FLORIDA. \^ , .9ru ,,~ c:our.nv OF ~ Y \/\AI IV !IV'-- ~:;r . M afficer~ . personally appe8r9d deposes 88Y's. unci COI.... ~ Ihe .i\\j\~~ LISA P. DELIO . i"r/f;;.~:<1 MY COMMISSION II DO 118434 ~~~!l EXPIRES: June 30, 2006 My CommissIon ''141ft r,i. Bonded Ttvu Notary Public Underwrilers lL dayot been first duly swam Nobiry Public $: 8ppllcatlan~..,.,Mllda'lft1D ~~ ttI "C "S:: o u: >- - c:: :l o (J lJ) ~ Q) c:: ~ - "> ttI "C ~ o - <( - :0 ~ w . 02/20/Z004 FRI 08:28 FAX 01/20/04 08:23 ~AX 727 4428844 . .011/012 1<<1010 RIVES . RIVES.PA ,;j > . 1/.., J V I Prepared by and R8lLIrn 10 ; I I Howani P. ~es, m Rives & RIveI. P A 1285 S. Myr~8 Avenue CleInVaIer. Fl 33756 ,- "p'~'r..L I . .... AC~ .. ... \.-I ,w,..' CllG""'i '-'- CKAWT === . - ICAUBf F. IE UIER. lURK If lUll' '-J PDl1..lAl CIDITY. ~ ('/2'/) 464--_ ' 4C!1OlMl 06-3lHOO3 14:52:'" UI 5l~ 00Jl06 II:032&'1m 1I:12lI59 1'!i:1WI EPG:~ RmRDItIi 1m Pl&li 1 . 'JD.50 E STIlIP - IIl219 3 15.''10.00 ,~~ DS _ II,Y ~ ~~ PIC ~et laIllI. ... ~;;g,sr> TOfIl: 15.600.50 am III. TEIUJB: ';', $5.(8).50 BYw. ~o.&x $.00 03-~67837 '~UN-3g-2003 2!53~ THIS WARRANTY DEED F'INEl.UlS CO !It IZ8SliJ PO 1648 11111I..llIImllll Made thi& 27" day or June, A.D. 2003 between D. ANNE NICHOLSON. a single woman. hereinafter called the Grantor, whose address is 8rO Virginia StRJet. Apartment 316, Dunedin Florida 34698 to LEONARD CHETKlN and MARY CHETKIN, his wife. whose address'is 701 Washi~n Street. Key West, Florida 33040. hereinafter called the Grantee: (Wh_r.- "",... .......... "grIIlICW" MIl 'lI/Ill\hl.' ''IN:IIHIe''' 1M pella 10 lIII. _1ftI.ncllll. -.. IeOOi ____...... and/or MoIgM oJ IIldlvlduals, Md 1Il...- 8N11'Dr~. of. __Ilofl.) Witnesseth, That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum ofTen 001181'5 ($10.00), and other valuable consldenltlons, receIpt of which Is hereby acknoWledged, hereby grants. bargains. end s8II$ unto said G1'8ntees, lhelr heirs and aSsigns, the following described land, situated lying and being In'the County of Pinellas, Slate of Florida, to wit: . Prop8l1y Appraisers Parcelldentiflcallon (Folio) Number. 02/29115/00000121010600, 0700.0800 Begin at the Southwest comer of the Northeast 114 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Plnellas County, Florida; thence North 300 feet; thence East 50 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence North 387 feet; thence East 287.6 reet; thence South 367 feet: thence West 287.6 feet to the Point of BegIMlng. Parcel ID #02IZ9/15/00000l210/lJ600 The South 300 feetoftt'le Wesl337.61 feet ofttlll N.E. 1/4 of the N.W. 1;4 of Section 2, TOWnship 29 South. Range 15 East LESS the South 100 feet and LESS the West 50 feet thereof for TOad right-of-way. Parce' 10 tI02I2911 5/00000/21 010700. The South 100 feet of the West 337.61 feet of the N,E, 1/4 of the N.W. 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29 South. Range 15 East. LESS the WeSl50 feet thereof for road rfght-of-way. Parcel/tJ #02129/15/00000/210/0800. Subject to easements and restrictions of nlCOrd. if any, ,and taxes for the year 2003, and subsequent years. . Being the same lands as conveyed to the Grantor In O,R. Book 8873, Page 911, Public Record& of Plnenas County, Florida. . And said Grantor hereby fully'warrant& the title to said Jand and will defend the same against the lawful Claim. of all persons whomsDever. In Witness Whereof. the said Grantor hat; hereunto set her hand and seal this day and year first. above written. 22/7~ c;- W1l1lass , .4 #;-~r/ /',K f;,er ;;;- W~/ J~~~/ ~LF" Ai 5/..1 (If M E4~ PrIn Name /P ~L/J~~~b&. D. ANNE NICHOLSON S'd 11 Sl.aSaSQf; u~~+a4o ~wwa pue p~euoaI dl0:EO .0 Ea qa.:l 02/20/Z004 FRI 08;28 FA! V~/~V'U4 u.;c~ r4& '~f 4'~.O.. . .012/012 IS U ~J. ~l'~~ . .~.~~.rA ".. j '...., ;;"i"~E.LL~S COU,",TY F'L~Q49 on: .KC ,8K U!959 pG STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PINEllAS: J hereby certify that on this day appeared before me, D. ANNE NICHOLSON, personally known to me, or who produced identl1k:ation, and who executed the foregoing lnstnJment end acknowledged to and before me that she executed said instrumentfor~~ pUrl'oses therein expressed. WItness my hand and olflelsl seal at the City of Clearwater, County of Pine of Flori", .....z.z."..yofJu... A.D.. 2003/ ~cu-. """int Name: Hawald p. RiYeI, II NDIBry Publ~ S\8t1l of~ Personally kT1ow"':~ PnlductclldenllflC8~on: _ TYlJII af IcIenlIfIaIlIon ProcM:ad: - '."" .-. ,.' ." ... tUflfJ\:..J ......,u.,. 1.1: :,j.' ...lIIIJ"'-.-..........z.. 1rlY~___"';I._ ......... ~.~ S.d 1191.aSasOE: u~~+a4o ~wwa pue p~euoal dl0:EO .0 Ea qa.::l .1'1. L1.1.LT.r:1.Lu"UVLI A vn.1V un L-lLl.1Jnn00: .<:,. u~tJ -t<,."U~ ------------ ~---------------- o.5'CfJIIGRE1f:~ ~",. ~ lB e47 i~ ~ ~~ ; ~ ~ 1 ~n .., 1\ <S II POf(T1()NOF 1\ NE~"rt:d/4 Ii 1\ 1 2 I ~ I" , ' , ! , I I ~~ !..:~ I .', ' "' I }Oil 1 ~\t ~ ~\" ~! :!:\ ~ ~ \ I : J'i \ i ~ \ i:~ \ ~5/8' SWlIOO~ IfG.M9le ClCCUl'lliSrxJRNrR"'=l CLEAR WI sR, FLORIDA. S,WJS'34T. 557.04'(/J) ("""" Pr)fIfIa1olF 1iE;fc~Y4 <8P s.OO",!O',)8'E". .J67.ru'(M) SI)IJJH .357.00'/1) S-OO'4S'28"E. 2DO.00'(II) SOUIII11XI.1)(J'(/J S,OO'.3S'3.f."E. JOD.OI'(J./) SOlJ1/f 'fiO.r;rl1l.) f: :::; ~~ 1. = 30 fiJ .~~;Y~1. ';Y' _$/8" N.OO'39'1~"W. 100.Of'(Ii) UJ~7 NOHIH 100.00'(,' 'JIl.60'(M) l<<1oo'(/>) RR~SlrC(;f;','arf St./NSCrhlGHlJlMJS.lIIIffl i'.fl.fltPC.57. f'~of\l~ ~~~~ ~#II, ~~ ..", ~ S ~ ='" f'flRCfi1.' erom AT 'THE SOIITHWBT CORNER OF mE NORlIfEASr 1/4 OF THE 4 OF SE.C7/Q/oI 2. TrYWI-iSHIP 29 SOIJrH, 1WIGC 15 Eo(S7; 300 FU:T; THENCE EAST 50 NOKTH 367 I'm'; "THENCE EAST SOUTHJf;7~7HCNCE1lEST2BJ.6FEETroTHE PAA'CCln.. THE SOWIf :JO(} Frrr 0" THE WBT 337.61 ~ET OF TIlE N.E. 1/4 OF 'THE: N,W, 1/4 or seCTION 2, TVWNSHIP 29 SOU1H, RANGE 15 EAST; lESS mE saum 100 f'EET ANa LESS THE Ii'fST 50 FEET' THEREOF FOR RQ4lJ RIGHT-oF-WAY. ~ - ~~l ~~. .~~.,~. ::' "I ~. ~!l ., Ii: ~ p#?ca m: THE SOI.I7H fOO FE..>T 0." THE WE:5T 337.5f /"EET OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF THE H..W. 1/4 OF SECTION 2, 7T.ltVNS/f/P 29 SOlfTH, RANGE fS FAST; lESS mE WEST 50 FUT TH<MJJF FOR RON) RiGI-IT-QF-WA'f N..OU~'IJ"lI'.. J47.17'(IJ) NOR1I;.Jn,oo'(lJ 11IR...JI'" N.OU~~,1~.86'(M) ij ~, OR,,;,. SWr;tJRliE11 NE 1/4 #114~2 ~: ______ HIGH~~~==:==:':::=.==:----- BENCHMARK) INe. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY' WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE ANO MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STMDARDS AS SIT FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LANO SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 61G/7-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATr-lE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES.. NOT VALID WITHOUT SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED WiTH SURVEYOR SEAL CER77Jl7CATIONS: :C~~= IHC. ATTORrIC'I'S'TTTl.E/NSllFW/CEfI.II{lJ,1NC. CERT/F/CA nON: -LEGEND: LP=UGHT POLE WPP=WOOD POWER R/W=RIGHT OF WA Y CONC=c/rlCRET[ N=NORTH PB=PLA T BOOK E~EAST PG=PA~ S=SOUTH LB=Uc' SED BUSINESS W=WfST {M)=FIEL MEASUREMENT SIR=SET IRON ROD (P)=PLA MEASUREMENT FCM=FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT FILE NO. 04-0428 F<: E VI S ION S SURVEYED BY.. JJ/DF/JC 1.) DRAWN BY.' WOS 2.) DATE DRAWN: 02-20-04 3.) DA TE SURVEYED: 02-19-04 4.) FlOOO lONF: IXIINo, I?SMR-iJI07dInATF.' .9/OJ/O.i'1 " ~ "AVCR PI< ~ A40< SUR VEYOR 1298 LAKEVIEW ROAD CLEARWATER. FL. 33756 AU THORIZA nON NO. LB PH. FAX# 6947 (727) 298-0286 (727) 461-0696 \ \ \ 02/20/2004 FRI 08:2$ FAX OZ/ZO/04 '1:11 ~AL 7Z7 ttZGa.. . .04/012 \lYVV" HiV~ . K1Y~~.r^ ~ Olon8t's M1M~ . OWNERoS 7TnE /NSUllANaJ POUCY Attorneys' Tide Insurance Fund,. Inc. ORLlaNDO, FLORIDA SUBIECTTO DiE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEYIlONS nOM co'9E:1tAGECONTAINED INSCHEDULE BAND THECONDmONSAND STIFU- LAnONS,AlTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND,INC., a FloridacotporatioD, herm. called The Fund. insures. as ofDau: ofPoIicyahcnvD in Schedule II. agaimt loss or ~, nOl cxc:cccling the AmO'llAt of Insurance awed ill Scbedule A. sustained. or inc:\lred by me iDsurcil by reason of: 1. TIde to the cstau: Or inrercst described in Schedule A being vested oCher than as sated thcreiD; 2. AAy defect in Or lien or en~btadce on the title; 5. Uumad.elability ofChe cide; 4. I-ck of a right of acICeSlI 110 and from the land. The FuJ10 will al$o pay the ~IS, aaomCJS' fees and es.penses incurred in ddClIK of ~e lide, as iJuured, ~t only tQ. the atcnt provided in the Conditions and SapWa- GODS. ' In Wiflws WIwr"!f. AlTORNEYS'1TTLE INSURANCE FUND, INe. has caused Ibis policy. to be .signed and sealed as of Dale ofPoliq shown in Schedule A. the policy to become ~d when counlCnigncd by an authorized sigDacory. , A.Ittttmttqa' T'Jde J.unuaCle F~ IDe:. By ~~,. 0wIe5 J. KonIati Praidcut SERIAL OPM- 2312460 I'UNO FOAM oPU (Iw. MlII) n'e1 11Sl.~6~SOE u~~~a4o ~wwa pue p~euoal e1EO:EO YO E~ qa.:l 02/20/2004 FRI 08:25 FA! DZ/ZD/D4 ":20 FAX 727 4426'44 . .RIVES & JUVl!S.J'A .005/012 1IXCUl510NS BOM COVllRAQ: " '.' -cxcl* ~ '-rM~;"~pOIi.,.UId'l1MI'.ua<lVP"'Ioa""dam..-..._e)I" The 1DII-.lll811cn awe .......-, ......- fees or rzpe- "j~ arise bJ' .-. ~ "" rquIa~ (illdu4iftg bul aot liallrcd 10 buiIdi..g a..d ~g IaWl" ordillanca. ~r ~) 1. (a) Any.... otllimAa!or ~. lO(I)*OCOIp"'", we orcojCll'lllCRloflbcland;(n) du:dlanacr,cll__orloo-. m<ricdnc-RI'obd"C.9"","~ ~~ do \mil; [Iii) ....;~....iD___hiporachaapinllledUaC__OnrnOCchelond oC...,. Ya~"~- orl> erea OD (~)' IlII IGltCdoD. or IIu: clfea ofanp....rion or \hac Ia.... ____ or ""allJpan:cl"fwlridlchebDdi&or_.p:an::or ... ~ p ~_. . of ~_.- .'--o.-"......,c,.,.,Jdnc _.._.:-. e:ac:cpltolhe..._........_ord1e~_un- .._~ ..-. &OK'mlllCft~ ....~ oiolUoG aIIec:liAC dlc ~oI bas bccIl1 ~ in IIbc public ~ at Dale or l'oIiqr. , fr_ a olGIa_ or ~ wkd '- ( IlIIbcwc. to the aknllballl DoIicc oflhe...-lbcnoi or. nG1KC of.. , (1)) lurtgvvcmoro~~_~d' ~ ~"_'~';o:-lI-d'='oflccIift.cheland- beenrccordedin cbopu1lticncorda.lDaloC ctelea.IicD...._......CC..,......"I'..........--.." -..- .... ttl PoIiq... Ihcl'corhu been ...........s.:4 ba die ....b1k reccmIo Mineo: oI'PoI'<1. INl DOl ddw&n;: 2. lI...>Isor_...I~-::_~~~~~~~pnD~Datc..fPalicywbicl1wvuld be bimling... rho riPuohpurcha1cr fM9!'iue w\dIou.l 1rarR~-r ~........__.~. " :S. ~.~acJ__dalms.....~_~~:__ . ta) ~ JUI1eral. _cd Ol qtee<I ro by uoe .._...............1; .' (1)1 _""':""to Tbel'llDOI. _ftCOlde:d.in die puWic...... _!)Me orrClliC)'. bullmoom to."'" i.-d ~~d no< dlodosed... Ofrili8lto11le Fund bJ' die iluuRd dai_l prior III tl1c date oJ>l: rlllUft:ll cbiDllftl bec:l/ll" aD iII&uRd UDder dIU poIil:y: (el raulliDc in ...tau.... tS-cc..,doe iaoun:cl d........ Cd) alllld1ioc Of o..aYd ..-...qUCllllO Dale olPoIicy; Ol' . , . . .. (e) ......lilItljp'-or~which_ld DOIluml beaullolaincd if tho: .........dllf:ldmanlbl flllIdwllluc fA1r lbc cowc oruua..llftS\llCcl f. ~ ~~~ ariocI ouc.ellbc ~ w:>liDC'" !be imuml rile alate or \nlA:TcK imurcd by d\I& policy. by..-on ofthc opctlllion ""cdenl bllAIuvplCJ',...... iNohaJq. or siIlIlilar crediron' .."IS w... tIlIll is \:mod on: (a) lbc~..-mc dac _ or in_~d by Ibis poliqloclDc IIccmed ll~cmm:yaaceorfnadulcnt tr.1DJfcr. ~ (II) die InlUllCliad ~.. _ OI'ia_~ll1lblapoli.,. bcbIr~. """'aCDliallnlMtl:rarapt whcI'c: tile pn:faullial tnDI&l' __ *- 11M: 11II...... (I) to llllII:Iy ncDrlldoe ___tOC...... or (ii) oEou<h-....1ioa II> iIRpIn uodcc to 11 ~far"""" .....~t...I~D acdIlor. CONDr.noNSAND ~TlON5 I. ~.rT_ TIl" 1..u.....iDc __ """" lDOd ia Ibis paIiC)' aacan: (a) "imun:d.: tllei.allRdllallK'diDSdl.cdulc A. ......1l1'!jeft tOlIn)' rilhllordJ_n.cPllNl1llllVld .....haclapolllbcn..cd~. t'-..t>o _-' CD dae imcRol of dlIIllJII\e4i1uun:d bJ'..,....tioa of law..cIlsciJI&Ubcd '-...~ i8d1lllinc. bulDDlIiIBiknIIll. Iscin. diSftilllOles. dcfttcor.~ pa-.aI r~ DCll&afltiD, or corporac or I\cIuciarr JUCa:SIOft (1)) .~ daiIa.oAt": ~ insure.. ~ '-.... d...... (q .1cIIowl~.'... -..-", acllAI knowledac. DOl ~ Im~ or__whidlllla)'lle ImpulCd ftlaa iaI...... bJ I'ClIIOII af Cbe publie 1-.da .. cldd1cd ia dLis policy of ""Y odIeI'......... wbio:lo. ia1parh.....1IClia llOCice 01'111_ ~ d1cJaAd. (d) "\aad'": llle IMd dcoaihcd << ~ to iD Sd1eduIc: A. ..... i1DJw- aI6xcd tbcraa wI1idl by law 00f1lItibnc real prupa11 Tl1c __ .,...... docs DOlIAdudo:...., pnIpCftJ bl:Jwd d1c IiDa ol1Jlc: ..... docribcd"l'I'efCl'ftCllD ill Schedule A. or...,rigkr. bllc....",JaI. _ OI'_CDliaaballinJlUCCD, ......-_ ~1IIllcs. WlIJS lIIC ~ bac DOlbioC b__ shall -a,. or lUnh dle _ to wbicb a ..... 0I:u:cas III aDd m- die Imd" m-a lIT dlio poIiq. Ce) ............: GIllClIlll&Co eked of InIIt. VUlt cIeaI, or otba' ~i~1 ro .poblK n:c......: ftCOIlb ~d \IDdcI _.. _ III cia", of Policy &. Ihc: plUJIGdC af -,:Wac COIlIlI1aCIM lIOIicc of -.. rdadnc to n:aI poapcnr .. purr:bucn f... wI1lC .... ...tloovl kDowIcdp. W'otb 'I'CIpCCllD Sccdoe l(a)(i9) ...r .. tlIduoioaI ra-. ec-nge. .puIlIi,,__-l1IaIlaboiftdudo: CII'IiroG.....18I prolItCliao:l HaD lI1ed in die nOI'C&a 01 the ck3 01_ U..iIlcd Sc:atts diclriu_ for die disaicl in wIaida die '-' iI klalcd. . (g) .-arlld:IbiIilr fIi IlK: ciIIc": ~ ....... Ol "flP'Ul:Dl _acr d'ec:tiDg "'" lide lDthe lIDd. aoteadwled....~ rt- CIlJYCI8&IC, wIlic:b -.Id ....bel.... ~ oElbc orall: or inIawt& cldcribed in 5c:be4\l!e A '" lie nIcuellr- die obIipIiGD'" puICb_ bJ'ftnuc: or a ~......sld0lll cwqairilIc die ddiwIy of ~ dde. to C.-w_lioD of ~_ c-...,-... 'IiII1: The ............ 01.- po/icJ'''' -.1..- in fora: IS 01 0- of Palky in Ilmw ", _ i.......l on1F -l-c" the imlInlcI ..,..... ... _ or IDwJ:Il ill .... Iaod. 01'......... ~ leaKed '" .. JlUIda- IIlClilcy -.sc cl- '" llplll'Clloacr &am die m-..I. Drool, 1O.loac :IS dle inauI:1I sb..n l1awe Iia~ bJ 'CllOOIl af ~ oE-.aftlJ ........ lIT tbr iiullIuI ill ""T nasIcr or CXlIl1OCJ"'Acc 01 d1c CSlaI8' ... into:tHt- This IlOIicyslW1aotcontinur: inf"",, ill"...,. of "",poucJo.oc. v.e1 11Sl..ZSZS0E hao Cbe imureoI oreidlot' C;. eJlatdeorbMa".tia Ole 1aIId, or fli) :111 ~ !COIrcd " a putdlMc -er lDClIfAC em- to d1c inau'ed. '" N.......' cw. or. Be ~by....... ~ t1Ic _d ....1lO1ifJ The TllOd prODlpdy iD....line (i) i.. CIIC vl;my IiIipiOIll aslCtfottb III 5ecdlIIl4(a) 1ldaw, (i) ill....., "-"cdcclhall ....-..._ inNnod bcr......scroE anydaim ol b~ ...intNeot wI1id1 Is . adYaIc lDoJ>e dd"tolhc _ _ ~_i""""'..s -trid1l11i&f1t ........ Jo.....~ r....... ~ ""'" ...",... ..hlc.."........ oI'tlris policy. ... rlii) if IiiIe lD"'" _ 0\0 ~ u ......... is rcjcacd IS _kablc.If..-ptaotia: lIloaIl_k pea 10 'he r......llacn.. u>1ku....:clallilllMlkr om.., F_sI1all tcnlIinllIcwiduqa..su> du: _1IiCr ... _ liD< wbic:b p.-pc ..~ ia ~~ p........ ~.lbad.i1.....IDIIOPIyTlac: Puacllb8ll ia aocase p~ die: ripa of ..., I....-cd IlIlcla'. 'Ihia poIiq .... The: fuo1l shall be pn;judiced ""dIe &il1ll'C aad d1a ODIJ 110 d1c _ Gfdr.c~. 4. Dcr-...r. +-.r~o.,afr.o.Na.o-.a To c....s-- (.) UP'"' wn- ''''l''CSl '" !he ........1IId NJ;ca... dIlC opbODS ~iIl~6ofthccc-dOdoasmdScipo1bDom, n.ei\lD4. al its -.. coa and..idaoo&l ~ cIalay. IlIaD prc>oidc &.Ibc dcfcwc of.... iluurcd. ill Iidsari-la wIaic:b ...,. d1inC 1*t)".-.11 a daillllUI_to lIuuidcCll'inlI:rat..--... buroalyu ID daOIC....1Cd CWICS afIlCDoaaD.rade&a.1Icft OI'~ ....oIbcr...u.:r iDwral agairu. br Ibis paIiq. ne FuatS oboIIl ....., rile ripllD R\c:a anlDfd oflc. choia (..tgect '" die ripl or Ibc: ~ .. 01ljca ,. re:lIOnabIc -l "'~l tbc -....d _ (0 "-&lrzd _ Gf IlCIloo "*' IIloJl noI be ....lc 1t1r.and. Ul paJ rile r..es of.,.., OIhcr CIOUIIOd.. The PUDd will not "".." lira. ..- _ capoIloa iDcun'cd by 11I....-.1....... ~oflho&eca_oE:oaioAwbidl aIIqe...acn ftOl huuNd lIpkut by Ibis~. (II) 'llo., J'und.... haoo: du: ripr. lit hs _ ...... 10 ..ritute ~ prmecalC..., llcdoa or poxeediag Of lD do uryo~ _ ..hic:b ill ~ ~."., bI: DCC-J or derinLleco esrablisb "'" tide lD tile esCl~e ar inDmlll. as .......... or 10 ~t.... .....s.-Ioao or lIalluop to die: r-d. The: PUIIlI """gkeaayopprvpria. u:IiOll uad<< tbe _ of d>is poIiq. ....~ or ftOl it Il1ll11 Ill: liable ~, apd obaIl DOt thereby _Iillbiliqr or"'" aor pmoioIon or !toia policy. II' no. ""'d d1:aIl aerdoc: itI rights oMadcr tbU flIlII'I&I"l'b. Ii obal1 do ... ctiligelldy. Ct:) 'WIH!o-=-Thc:"""" oIWI haoe......... "" acMo....ina!rpooed . cIclcaoc:lS req..ircd Ol.......ttecl by doe pnwUioas 01 oJ>is """",,,. "'the u~~~a4o ~wwa pue p~euoaI e110:EO VO EZ qa.:l 0%/%0/2004 FRI 08:Z8 FA! OZ/20/U4 U~: Z1 JI^~ UZlllJU . .0081012 If6I uu", ~j~~~ * KjV~~.~^ Aft6rneys' Title IDslU'aD~e Fund, IDe: OWNER'S POlley Sc.bedllle A Policy No.: OPM.23 12460 Eftecliyel>aIc:; J\IIIC 30, 2003 @ 2:Sll'll( Agea.~, Falc:: RefbalGc: IS13NiclIDIIoa Amauat oflDs:uralMr. $110.000.00 I. Name orlDsun:d: t.co.IanI 0IcIIdP -.I M.y Cbcddu, his wile ,', 2, lhe e$UdZ: Ot ialenct iu lbc: Iliad lkscDbe4l1arJ1laQl! wlUcla is ~ by dlis potity is a file simpIc (if olllet, specltY .taaIlel ... ia at .... ..tRclivc _ bcreof.w1lll ia tIoe aamed ms....d as sbowII by ~ n:earded 1/1. Official ltec<<ds Book U"', Pace 154I,ot'lkpab&m;ords ofPiDdIas CounIy.~. 3. 'Ibc lad ~ 10 ill dIis poJiey is dIlII:ribed u mu....s: 11aal put ofrhc NWl14 oftha NW1/4 oCSaGtioa Z. TOIDIUblp 29 SOlIIb,. RaD&c IS East men ~ cIescri10Dd 011 EldIi1Iir"4" ,,1tICbCd 1oen:ID. L~ Az.=h Sipalan: ........... P. Jli9cs m .bmiIJ& Aseat IIDwuIl r.am... m IUVI:S "lUVES, ........ UII55. ~A__ ConraIIar,.n. 33~ F_ OPM-SCH. .. ,n... , 1IJ8) -..... E'd 1191.aSaSOE u~~~a4o ~wwa pue p~euoaI dl0:EO .0 Ea qa~ 02/20/2004 FRI 08:26 FAX UZ/ZO/U4 UB:.l YAA 727 '4Z6.4' . .007/012 ICI UUt; KIV~ . KIV~~.VA A'tt&meys' TItle Insuruc:e Fund, Int OWNER'S POUCY ScbeduleB Policy No.: 0n4-23I:z.%O Aa"'s :File R.cl.aalce: I SJ 3N"........... lhU policy docs DClIl ~ apiut loss 01"""" by ~ ofdae JiD1IIrtriua .cxccpdQDJ: . 1. TaxCG b 1bc yar or.. efJi:l>IM cbde of1bis poIky 3Dll1ucs or SpllClal1lUClSlllaals which we DOl sbGoonI u ..ui<iaa IieIII by rile pablic JeCORIJ. 1 Ilipcs 01 c~ ofpllltiel ill ~OD 1lOt ~ by tile plIbw.-*' 3. ~ cwaIapI. '-adBIy IiDe diIpma. mil my GdIet lIIMIlBlI "IbU:b WOllId be disc10sed ~ &1l _ S\IIW)' - iupectiaD or..... pRIIDiscs. 4. E_ ardaials or __ _ sIKnnl by lb. public l'fICOIdL s. A:4y IOcD, lW d8\lllll a 1iIID, &. IICIYKcs, Iabar. or __ henlIDfDn: or bcRIdIIlt &misUd, -s-aa by 1_ _ Dot sbowa by 1110 plIIaIiI:---. 6. AJq acIveae o-wp. ~ by Ik SIIIc af I'Iorida by risk or ~ 10 ay poltillO of 1bo .... iDsmaI a.a-cIcc. iIIc1wIiq ~ 6IIcod md utIfidaIIy c::lqIO>Il>lI.... _Iud; -=d ID sucb Iaall.. 7. ThDlicaofall'llll1t.1lr1lle yar200l_8lId~, wIlieb-DO!)le!dIle 1IId~. 8. .........t to PIarida p,,_ Coap. n:canW .. Deed 800II: I '14,l'ap IS IInII DIIl4ific4 ill O. R. Book 3000. PIce 321 of cIzo,l'\>blk a-dI ofPiadlu CoIuIty. F1cD1a. ~. 1- 2 IlII4 5 UO\II: -1Icreb)" delele4. F_ 0#'M00IICR. B "" S/fIf) -.. 01 · d 11S1.2S2S0E u~~~a4o ~wwa pue p~euoal dEO:EO .0 E2 qa.::l 02/20/2004 FRI 0':27 FAX 02/20/04 01,21 FAX 727 .42&844 . RIVES. K1VES.rA ~' '-/' .......,.' EXHIBIT uA- Bq;.DltJu:~~ofdld(on..., lJ/ C!ftkNt1TfJn<<Jt 1/1 qf&<<l6wl2. TOW1fShip ~~R-ac J$.&d.Pind/Ia~.RariIa&: tIrenoeNIJII'IiJOOfcd; ~~ SOp . 10 .,__~~ I6mccNorilJ JUfed: ~.Ead281~fed: 1Itmr:tts-dr 367ftd; __ :War 261.6f<<l CD IkPfJiJJ1 of~ 1M $GaIfr 300 f-d I1f IJte War B1.6i fC if f<< N.E.'W tl/tJJe N.w.. JJ.I qf&d1_ 2- T---+29 s.fr, ~ 1J FAst; r.mtheSorllh 100 flrrDllt/lESS tN: Wcst 50 fed rltcrrDf farroad~, . , 1kSoIllI l(HJfmqfthr: 1ft:>rI JJ7..61joa of 1M HE_ 1/4 tf" dteN..Jr: Jl.lIlfScabr 2. T~ 29s-dJ, ~ 11 .&ar. LESS. 11=10 fUl rhcrcoffOr I'OtItl Titf/d--o.F-y. . s.a 11Sl.~S~SOE u~~~a4o ~wwa pu~ p~~uoaI .008/012 iIli UI aEO:EO YO E~ qa.;:j 02/20/2004 FRI 09:27 FAX .Z/~O/0408:zz rAt 7~-'-44Z8'44 . K!Vl!.S r.IHV":S,l'A a 009/012 " fund ....., pu...... -r Hlip;- ID .8aaI der_iGali"" by II ~rt m' ~pcten<.JtaiIdiaic>n aDd expn:srIy rde! llIe ript. 1ft .lJ sole ~_.l.OappaI r.-1lA'f~~Lor~or- (dl J.. all easel.,!aere <bio poIiq pumllI or reqwra The I'Imd ID pro>eCUl.C or pnnlde lor lhc cWasc 01.., :llClion Ot Pf'D"Cdillf, !he iluurecl &/lall sa:ure 10 The F\Ind m. ricbt ID :so pIlllKCUIolt 01' ~ dere- iB d>e KlIl1l1 or proaccdinC. :md d appcaIo lh~, and permit The I'Imd .. lIM.N Us opdaa. IIIc: /WDC of IIIc: iosured far lIlil parpoIC. Whc_......-- bfne f'lHI4, chc:bu:urcd. ol"lbc l'uNI', lIlIpCIIK. sbaIl ..... Tbc tuad :011 _bIe aid (j) in ...,. -=0- 01' ......,.,edinl. xcuriaJ C'Pidea<<, -.;mll{....- prooeco.... .... .wa>dloclbe aaiaoI<< ~ or~"",dcPoooat. an4 (ii) ... ..., _ Iawfu1 _ o.NcIa iD doe opinl.... oE n.c ,..., ...., be ..-.y or ~ to -"!ish ello alle ...1lIe co_ or iDr.e.->> iasURd.. If Tbc had iI ~ by du: rfoil..... of ell. iasur<:4 1'0 funish lit. required c.oopcIIlo-. Tbc Fu..... obIIpdons co 1M iftlUftId ....dct !be poliq'" ~. induding ....,. Iiobili." or o1llipioa 1DdeCend. JlftIICCIIlI'. ..................,. Bdptioa, wlda rcpt"Cl ...dle _ Cl&"mulI:n ~s ouch coaperadoa. So ,..,..,.,...,. u-r ID Ilddilioa at aDd __ noOces rftl........ _der Seclioa , or lheoc ~ aadStipul_ ......bee.. pte"i<IccI nr _d. II poooC of ... or dMucc aipcd and _ u> bf 4>e iasumI daidlaoH sbaII be famished 10 The..........1bm 90 om,. arw!be illl1lld cIaiftwd m:.n ..-........ thelloCll p.ing rix 10 _loa or....... Tb. proof or '- 01' dalugcJball Oaaibc du: ddcn ie.....1ial or ......."'~ce _lIle tide, orod.l:...n.acr....uMapiDltby_poIiq~comQl'""'d>e ....... ar..... or..... _1bIII_.IO_ _tpoooiWc. lhe buD of aladaliDf tbc: __ ol tbo: _ or cWugo:. If Tho: F""d is prcjudieed bJ ell. fall,," 01 Jbe "'-'aI cIai-.c ID .......... d>e required pnoI oil.... or ~ The Fuad'~ obIIpdoDs ID the -..cd under Ilut poIlcy ..... _, Incllldla<< _y liabilily .... obllpd_codclicad, ...--,OI'~_....,.II......... wiIIl n:prd IDIIIc: _or _os requirialg JUdo pnxtil arloss .... clunaIr. lAaddllion._inNto:ddaiaw>UD..,rc~be:~ID"'_1 10 acamIaadoa ......... ....s. 111...., IIIId>oriaocd repreRAcaa.e aC"Ibc Fud..., Iball poud1Ko: fGr ..-;"aIiOD. inspo:~_ aDd eep,iDc, 31 ouch .......allle Ii_ aIIlI pIaca as ..at llc dcIIpaoal1l1-r.udao- riOl:d rcpraaI""'"'= of~ 1'WMI...u -..b. boob,.......... cba;b. _PGIlllCnO:e and ~ 'IIhed>a- bcariIlf II dale bd'orc ...- ....... Daoe of polky. wbich ~ ....1Uia lD cbo: loa or cI:oJuse. "'1II>cr.if.....--.i""...,....IIIorizIod~lMorn.c '.....s," -- _11haIi (1'1III111 ............. ill wrilinS.........,--- dzed rcpcae8mi.. ""-1'I>c "- 10 eaIIline. ilupcc:1 ... copy aU _ordoI. boob. Jo:dcen. ch<<b. ~ md 1MlIl0AAda in die: ~ or......-l oEa ......".... wbicb ...--IlIypert3in to dlc loss _ ~. AD i~ daip:accd III --.6den1il1 by <be iDnmI_pnotded CD Tl>c: Fuad ~ID doll So:etio,,1IIaII HL be: discIoso:. hi ocben uaIcoI, ill dac ~ju~ of"'1'1ll: FIm4. it is """"""'1 iD dle ~ ofllae cIoII-. r~ aC\hc in5urc4cJa.laaur.lltaubm~........lWiao....r..... ................. ..........Illy rcqllmed ~<< can< penIlioR.... ... Xlt1lCIC rea- .-blp necesaaJ7 U6naaliooo ...... IhInI poRia .. requlnd ia dID puacnpb oha\I M'IIIiaale....,1iabiIi<r arn.e Fund ul>Cfer _ poIi.,..as ID IhH c:laim. 5. 0....- To ...,..... 0lIlerwU0: lTo:Iee aa-; T.............. v..w;.,. iii CUI: a( a cbIIII under dIls policy. Tbe Fund. ataIl ~ IItI: (oiIOO1!q adclitioG3Ol.- (a) T. Par wy........ ro..r-..... ~ "''--- To",o< lI:nCIo:ir(l'l7llllllll.oCdac __t..no..nu...: pnoJcrdo.. policy ~mcrwich ., _ aaomqs' li:a aacJ CIIpCDII:S.........cd by i1ae loaurecI d.......t, _.... -..uo:.l ",,1'1>0: Fllael. "" 10 doc ti_ arpAylQ_.... lc1tclcl' of I81'""'"'t -..I ",11i<h 1'tw: J\md is..wigucd co pay. . Upoo _ eocen:ise lop Th. )Uad of dU opliOll. oIIli:obi1itp:md ablip dOlDID .... iosund UDder !his paIiey.olher.... II> mate die p~1 required, sboII __.... illdudiDc 11ft)' IhbIlirr or o1>lip.liaa '", cIelClld. prolOCC\lle. or _lin.... "'" Ii........ uod Ibo: poIicy~" be: IUlRftdCR<l ... 'Jbe t\uuI fGr ~ (b) T. Par-O"--UeSelde 'WIdo....... 0....................,.., w W"'" .... a...-. a.;",-. (il to P"7 or -........ KIIIc with ocha pania for 01' ... the _e of an inIure4 cJ;,imUJ( any cW.m iaaurcd apWl under IIliI policy. ....tber wido lID)' co.... aIftIrDC)'S' kcJ. aad cxpcux:IlnculftCl B'd 1191.aSaSOE by Ihc lDNred cIaiaw>I which _ :..~oriZf'll""Tbc Fund. up... the ......ofpoyD\l:~L.....s. .h no: Futld... ~~ IOlI"r- oc . (iI) ID IIIIt' or o'l>..iwiseJC<<lc WIth Ihe ,1II1IId clllim:oht Ihe 1005 or ~ pI'O'l'ickd for u*r this pol..,., ~hu wido ..., costs, ,,1tOm..,.' fces _IS expaucs incun-c4 by dlc iasunod daioPftt ..bid. ~:woh....u..dby1bdunelup 1<)110. lime IlfI""7"'CIIlandwbidl The f'lmd"jo obIiS-eI lD pay. U,*, t.b.e CIIClCIse bJ."J1>c Fund oCeidler ofllle oplions pmoiokdlor in panvaphl (b) (il Ot (jj). The J'Iand'. obIipdono 10 Iho: "-red undc< dU< poIIq to.- !he dlimed IDss or dam~, ocher doIIA dI< ...,-..11 ft<lulrcd ID llc ...... all ,"","-u:. induding ornylal.iJi., or obIip- Iioa ID dd'CAd. ..........101 .... -..inue ....y liliptioco. ,.0..... . .- ...lofUabililp....C. -. This politf is a eOlltlXl 01 iado:-itJ .".;.... ac....J ......etary ~ M danIagl:lU<lIIined....ina1m4 bJ lhc: iaaaro:d cboiIoant who.......suIlcml 1_ or d_~ by ~ 0( mauen iNvred 3pins&....1hII poIicr;and ODIJ' lD doc cxtmt bcrcIa dacdbed. (11) Thell:obilllr otnle JUDd uader Ibis poI;q. shIlll "'0< cIlcnd the lc:ut of: (I) the Antoo..t oCl~ IIalccl in Scbedolc A; or. (il) <be di&iatcnco: 11&__ tbc wluo: of "'" LDourcd aQlC or iln"'cSC:l1 in.....ed IUlld dol:"..).... or...., inoo&rwI_oiiNer_SOIbjl!('[ to die: dclcct, IIat ... enctlODbtIIncc iDJwed apiI>st by lAG poIicr. (6' (7JoU,.........,...~~--~;-~ fIo&i&) (e)"'" 1l\md...ot .-rOGl1t11_- _..,.' fca.....s """....... incum:d ill acconbI>QI with Scaiao i eI tbcsc c-cJitio... :o...s SIipl>- 13Iioo>s "~II""R1n. 1I'tlM: IaIId dGIc:riIIcd ia ScUdule It. __ oE twO ... mDf'C pueelc ..w.:b an: _........ aoinck ..II:, mcI.1oso is .,lIlWilloecl alkctiog_ or....... aClbo:paruIs ....1_aIL the IoadWI be: ~dand seaIcd un.. pc'O ....bouIo... if1he _tof~ lI"fI4I... dois poIicy_ diWlcdprDnra a....th. __ OR Due ofPoIicyolcadl"'pan&eparc:c1 ...lbt: whoIe.e.cd....... or...,iao...-.acs_e_q....t to Due arpoIicY.lOdIo:uali:o&lJicJ ...."..)_.....ochm-ioo: 1I<<G -crcecI upan as tOad> p;lRdbyn. ......s and the __.. the: dllleofcbc w-..... oflbispoliqmcl .heNna., 11.. cqor.... "'WIIClIt or 111'" a>dOllC1llCDt ;oaacbc:d ID ... poIio:y. So ...........01 UoIliliI)o (IJ 11Th. f\u!dal3bli....lhe ul1e....~III00adle:ollcrm defea,. I;'" ....coQamtr.aDce. orcurcsdM: IKIlot3 rip.olacx:o:. toDl"lnm die IIIDd, or uueo ..... _ oIl11l1D11r~ otlble.:oI\ as i...__. ID 3 ~ ditiport _r by lit')' _dlOlI, in<II>lIias IilipIiaro :aAlI lhe -..pIeIioo elmy........~. ilWII h:M: IUD7pc:rf"otmed ia obliplioluwilb r""J'CtlUl dwmUlCl'U>cI sbolIl_be liable: lor..,- 1_ or cl:IJnap CIIDI:d doercby. (blln dte ..- <If ...,.Iiti........ iAducl"C Iilipdan. br The FUnd .... with l1>e 1\lnO'. co_to 1bc f\md....O h""" _liallilily for Iou or dulacc tIIICil lhcft baI beeia 1I.fi1>31 c1ellt.l1lliDa~ by 3 aIolft 01. cooapeaml jurWicDou. lIDd cIIopooWon 01:011 :oppcaIo tilemo-. lid- _ to Ibc lilIc :os iIuun:d. ee) The l'IIad lItall_ be liable fGr loa or dmlacc'o an, iIuured I"orw.1IiIi1y....unlal"ily....-d "'lhe insured.ia ...UIi..C-yuu"'.... auit..u.-. llIe prior wrinzn C6II-.t a( TIoc: F""d. 10........... ot~......... ...T_____ 0(~1Y All ~ UDder ebb policy, rKC'Cp1 poIJmCGIlI mad~ (01' COltS, "W>III<'J'" ~- npeuoa....... redua: dae _toldle i.......ncc: p.... [lut1D. 1 J. lMIliIitT N .... ' ..... II. .......r ~ doa& ~ lIIItoull\ or il\lWlllloc _der this policy shaD be: reel....... '" :my Mlooat The F..... ....,. pa, uDder :oily policy Uuu.rias a IDOITI"I" 10 wbich ~ is IaIa:D io SclaeduIe \I 01' lDwlUdo the buurcd h.."&ICCcI, -cd. 01 eaRn 1lII!lea. ourllicl\ ilbcrcala _-' '" a. iDAIftd lID4wb;,;h illl dIaIF or Iicn Oil duo atallo or ..._ dacribcd or refcrrcd 10 ;D ~Io: It.. _ lb. ...........t... p3icI Iball "" do:eaed a pafllleDt under diu poJ\cr III the iIuared _. 12. ra,-t.,~ (:a) No paJlDCDlIIraU loc ... wid>out praduolio>g Ihi> paIicy lor eud_t oldie flIlTIIICOt DIIIMa the pol;'" baI bo:al ....1 Dr de- ~. in ....ic;1o cue proofofloss.... clesllDc:ci_ohall be I'\ImDbed lO lhc ....litt!actillll of"Ibe Pwad. (b) Wben liability ....d doc ""'IeAt of 1_ or .... Ms bo:cd ddinildy /dcd io -*'- wid> thao: CoDditiona:and SIipuI:oIioo.. u~~~a4o ~wwa pU~ p~~uoaT daO:EO .0 Ea qa.::l r-- Jluf1liaWHW{J!lIUU UlUiif 0" .... . ...'- ilI8i~E (008) · i995'0Z CLot) .... Q.. ..0 Utili 111 "opll1lpO . ...~ 0.. preA'alnoll ~llUa:> atUad.Jo:) !itgg "0 ; nU.l }ltm{!, ihltUt.l.il~$1 .. 111 la3iDO ;;a "E9BC"O.-l:-t01i 11":' ",- .... '1IUlllclwDD 8uIAIO..J UI I~'" . I( If -11 rr · · '~'l. 1'1 ~ '11" lO ,a'IeAO:! ~ltoq. u DJIIUl.lOJUI JO~ ~ 1fH f flflj il~ ;[fli.iilliHi ~N ... .. (' ~lll Irot! [l l;f.. -f- l.t., !::.., ..~ . rt h>,f(IUt ~il fpun ~ it ~~ ... .. .... .. .... .. .. CD '1 t-f(fl -litH ~ llfj' j llil it t .. r-- C\J I' !r! f ~[-JII'I tlh f.f!:. [ (7) ~. C\J .11 'f rfl 'Iii 21.. JR.- nll!. ~t II) 0 II'; ~I" {hill fii ffiilligt,i Ii ~ (l') J tJilll .. '18 saa. I\'U ~h ~ ~ r r . Ii I 'of of r B. U. f u. t Ii h l ! f II< C ntijmjHel11 ~}Uzjif~lfil UflUI ~ ~ .... V<D'l101ll '0 CINY'llIO .. .:L " .jJ lis It-I t!i\)l.ttl.fi ~ 2.' A.a.' [J'.c; ~ CIl 'JUI ~ J'ilri1b4iIHI!}IM :tllUhlf1 u 'Punil 3Jtm.mSUI ap~~ :n ' lsA~wonv il[. r J ., !~I>llt II rhl flW\ E .In 1-1- fn}!~J fr Ul''fjt }I E CIl 'C IW Id ht fi{iJ!UFI jlhdkii c III K>no,J 'C 7JNWl1SNInLlL .iO !II Ui I!: HIF~ ; ~!IfHih[ '- S.DrMO III c II I. ~f} at. >IIL I Jo lnJ I i. 0 tJ. Jill.l J.a !(i1 ilij1f ~f 0 CIl .... l! l! i t K l g 8 1- 11 ( tIl'l ill .. ... .. ll:l t f lr ~ l {: l f. t i :;1 [r I t l r '- 0 ... N Q.. C\J 0 .. (l') 0 ..,. 0 (l') C\J ,g CIl Li.. . . Project Narrative Application for Comprehensive Land Plan Amendment Proiect Name: Hie:hland Avenue Redevelopment Plan Introduction The Applicant, Bayshore Broadway, Inc. is the contract Purchaser ofthe Property and is Petitioning for Annexation, requesting a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment and seeking a Zoning Atlas Amendment. The Petition for Annexation, request for a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment and Zoning Atlas Amendment are consistent with the goals ofthe underlying Comprehensive Plan and the proposed density is compatible with the surrounding area. It follows the pattern of development intended for in:fill parcels and can be adequately serviced by the City. The subject property is approximately 4.4 acres located on the east side of Highland Avenue south of Union Street about y.. mile. The subject site is located in Pinellas County but is surrounded on all sides by property within the City limits. The property presently has two (2) 1950's era single-family residential homes that are used by the property owner as rental properties. Annexation will allow for in:fill development consistent with the urban renewal strategies that predominate in implementing Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. This type of in:fill will make available reasonably priced housing - which is encouraged by the Plan. While the redevelopment of this property will increase traffic, it is not to adversely affect the current level of service in an unreasonable or disproportionate manner. Water and sewer service is available at the site and appear adequate to service a residential community at this location. The request involves a land use change from Residential Low to Residential High with Medium High Residential District zoning to allow for 30 dwelling units per acre. This application meets the zoning criteria which is designed ''to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of medium high density B,1JLlnn.::J..:J: ~ULJ;-J-r::.U':l--~ o..'I'~WIlB SJRSft" tJ..20fF iB6947 r~ ~t ~ 1 51 In ;., 1\ el\ f'(;)ROON 0,'" jl IIE~Y4 I\ ,\ "'\ r ~I ~ I' · 1 1 1 ~~ l~~~ l ~\~ I iU\~ 1 ~\i ~ ~\~ I :<1 ~ j \ , \ ~ r \ ~ i i ~ I~ \ :} I~ \ FlRSft" 8WBQO C1JmFR I fJ inAe 0CCIiPIESca!MR =1 CLEARW: 8R, FLORIDA. 'i. ~.1LTn.Lf-ii'l/LI ..:'i V.Ll'l/ un S.IXi.JO'JB"E. .J67.rH'(M) SO/JTI!. ;M7.00'(lJ ~~~~f. ~~~ N.{]IjJ$'/J'll'. :J47.11'(M) ~.1I11.rxJ'(lJ S.W;,s'J4<:, S6UU'(I.t) -"" "'"""" IlEl/41<MV4 '''''"''' 9~~~f. ~~~~ S.oo'35''u<:.Ioa.OI'(M) sourH 'UUIO'(J.) rffit1; ~ ~ ~ 1'~~~/. ~~1 /O"PEPP6l WEE =-S~ s.OO'4l!'2B"E. 200.00'(1/) SWIIi:;Q(l.OO'(IJ SIR"...," f/.W:J9'/:J"III. 100.01'(1.1) 1.86947 . NOFmi llnOO' --~~ ~~~~~:-~-,~-~- ------------------------------- BENCH/1;/'ARK, 1298 LAKEVIEW ROAD CLEARWATER, FL. 33756 AUTHORiZA nON NO. PH. FAX! LB 6947 /NC. SUR VEYOR (727) 298-0286 (727) 461-0696 := fi) :~. N.()(T~"Wioc.J:?86'(N) I-LEGEND: LP=L1GHT POLE WPP=WOOD POWER POLE RjW=,qIGHT OF WA y CONC=CONCRETE N=NORTH PB=PLA T BOOK E=EAST PG=PAGE S=SOUTH LB=L1CENSED BUS/NESS W=WEST (M)"'FIELD MEASUREMENT SiR=SET IRON ROD (P)=PLAT MEASUREMENT FCM=FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT FILE NO. SURVEYED BY' DRAWN BY' DATE DRAWN: DA TE SURVEYED: FI om 70NF' (TfI//2" >: ~ ~. "~~ g '. "..~. ~. ~"~i~' ~ii .~; " ~ ~- C 15 30 1" ~ :30 ~ P~H: THE SOUTH :JOO FE.."'T OF rHt: ItBT J:J7,87 FEU OF mE /'i.Eo 1/4 OF THE H.W. 1/4 OFSt:r:TlON2. 1UWNSHJP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST; lESS /HE SOi./TH 100 Ffrr A'UJ LESS THE: IIl5T 50 FEU THEREOF FaR RIloID RIGHT-()F-WAT. PARCEl.. HI: THE: SOUTH 100 fEET OF THE: WErr :J>>.H FEET OF THE H.C. 1/4 OF THE N.ff. 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOI./TH. RANGE 15 EASr; LESS THE WEST sa FEET THEREOF FrJR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY 'J9.80'OI) 'OfIl.OO'(P) FJ11/l"~SlJroR.l.I1f'l SJ.wsEr IIIGHlNIJJS. UMT I 1".&.e.PG.Sl. O;;;o;;;roRNERlffl/f ,. '/4 SECOOI(2 04-0428 REVISIONS JJ/DF /JC 1.) H1JB 2.) 02-20-04 3.) 02-19-04 4.) ~INn. 1?.'i(NR-mn7r.llnA7F.' CBR77F1CA.770NS: lMl'SHORE BRQWIII'IY, JIIC. Tk€5MIlHLAWF/F{jJ Am:lfINEYS'TTTlEINSURNICEF<iND./NC. CERTlF/CA TlON: . . while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization. . .." Site Characteristics and Surroundine: Area The subject property has a moderate contour and several trees. The property is about ~ mile south of the Clearwater/Dunedin boundary. A variety ofland uses are found within proximity to the site. North and East: The property adjacent to the north and west is High Density Residential and is developed as a high density rental complex consisting of 19 buildings with the associated parking and community amenities. County records indicate that this apartment complex was constructed in 1970. Further north is another apartment complex. At the SE comer of Union and Highland is a commercial center. Dunedin Middle School is on the NW comer of Union and Highland. South: The property to the south is LMDR and is developed as single family dwellings. West: The property fronts on Highland Avenue to the west. Across Highland Avenue is a single family development. Summarv The Petition for Annexation, Request for a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment and a Zoning Atlas Amendment are: 1) Consistent with the underlying goals of the Comprehensive Plan and will further the purpose of the Community Development Code 2) Compatible with the surrounding area 3) Not in conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood 4) Not going to adversely affect the character of the neighborhood and the City 5) Are not going adversely burden public facilities, including traffic- carrying capacities 6) Are not going to adversely affect the natural environment 7) Following the pattern of development intended for infill parcels and the subject site can be adequately serviced by the City. 1 City of Clearwater CDC Zoning Districts 2-401. Intent and purpose Page 2 ~ . ElLE /A/ Z. 20#'/" O)&tJL Project Name: Highland Avenue Redevelopment Plan City of Clearwater Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment February 27. 2004 Applicant: Bayshore/Broadway, Inc. 221 Turner Street Clearwater, Fl. 33756 Representative( s): Alex J. Panik, PE Alex J. Panik, P .E., P .A. Consulting Engineer 39326 US Highway 19 N. Tarpon Springs, Fl. 34689 and Thomas Wilkey Project Engineer: Alex J. Panik, PE Alex J. Panik, P .E., P .A. Consulting Engineer 39326 US Highway 19 N. Tarpon Springs, Fl. 34689 ~ . Table of Submittals Application for Zoning Atlas Amendment Project Name: Highland Avenue Redevelopment Plan 1. Application 2. Sealed Survey (Legal description) 3. Affidavit to Authorize Agent 4. Copy of Deed and Title Insurance Policy 5. Project Narrative includes: a. An assessment of the impacts of the proposed change on the adequacy of public facilities, the environment, community character and the fiscal condition of the City b. Information that demonstrates that the proposed amendment complies with certain standards. c. Names the corporation that has a contractual interest in the property ~ CITY OF CLEAR.ER APPLICATION FOR ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT PLANNING SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE A VENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME: '3t\-\SOOlE ~\'\cX1..J~ :!JlC. \' MAILING ADDRESS: L1..~ 'U( ~( ~ .. c...\..:~C(W~( ,K.. ~~\~ PHONE NUMBER: \ 1... ,. '-\ '-\. '\. \ """ \~ FAX NUMBER: -rL,." b\ . c\, 3'3> PROPERTY OWNERS: '-eo~o -\ ~. C,*~'\~'N (List all owners) AGENT NAME: \4\.."tX V ~N\'( I -r~6"-- \..J...:)\~\U'-. ~( ~O~C~I ~~a- --; y MAILING ADDRESS: ~~~L~ \Js. ~'1-l~ toJ \C4./fON ~$\Crc;' ,tL ~~-bt'\ PHONE NUMBER: \. 'L.." · C\.. s,~. ~\ LO FAX NUMBER: \\....,. ~~'-\.. ~ \'\ ~ SITE INFORMATION: .\ LOCATION: \4\b\\.'-~~ ~ ~ C\o~ STREET ADDRESS: ~ 1.. /1.Du..S ~ \'f:r\+\..~~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ ~bC.-~W PARCEL NUMBER: (::)'1- \'L~\\S \~\c...\O \cnoo ~cz:. · t1\\\$Q... ~. (\o~ .\- (O~~~ 0\ -\- ! O~Oo EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION: 'RL- SIZE OF SITE: 4.l.\ G.J:.. ,e..s. REASON FOR REQUEST: ~i- +0 ~~f'~ ~,~ \-0 <:l\\O'-J ~I ""+= I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. n expires:",,'. '~"" /f1ij:'JI.<:;;;--. .. Margaret 1 Savage .', ~.~ ;,.~ My COMMISSION # DD034477 EXPIRES \~>/, .. October 18,2005 :;f.,'".:" ;'UNDW THRU TROY FAIN INSURANC INC Page 1 of 2 , 02/19/2004 11:53 72744795' BILL WITTER . PAGE 02 e CITY OF CLEARWATER AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION . MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDINC. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. 2111 FLOOR PHONE (721)-562-4567 FAX (J21) 562"'576 Leonard Chetkin Marv Chetkjn (NBI1l8 of All pro~1\' own.r&) 1. That (I a~) the owner(s) and record tiUe holder(s) of the following described property: 4.4 acres (mol) on Hlahland Avenue in CJearwatAr Pin~ountv I=lnrirl~ See x I it A attached for Legal Description (Addl9ll8 or GenenlIl.DclICIOn) 2. That this profJE?l1Y constitutes the property for which a request for a: Comprehensive Land Use Change Petition of An nexation Zonina Atlas Am~nd~nt (Nabmt Of AIqIIGGtJ 3. That the Undenilgne@ave) appointed a~) appoint Geoffrev Weber. Thomas Wilkev. or Alex..Panic .. (hI8IIheIr) agent(8) ID ~ IllY potllIar1& rrr Clht Ib:umentll.m -IllY tu llfl'8ct auch pBItkm; , 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce Ihe City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above desaibed property; 5. That <e. the undersigned authority, hereby certify th STATE OF F1..ORIDA, \^ I ~A " ~ COUN1Y or:~ y \NI11V V\T'-- ~efontme the u ed. !In Gffic::8r duly . pemonaJly appeared deposes nys, L1nc1enata eonmnts ~ the ~1.::;A~r;:;;:({. LISA P. DELIO . N"Ji.\~ MY COMMISSION # DD 118434 ~.~it" EXPIRES: June 30, 2006 ~P'f, ~,,\ Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters My Cornmisalon d F.Iorfda. on this ~ day of . been find duly swom Notary Public 9: RPp/laIIton ~ twl8WfAllld8'llt 10 ALIIhclI'b ~ . QJ "0 s:::: o u.. >- - c: :::II o u Kt CD c: a: .... G) ~ QJ G) o ~.s - os: QJ "0 IE < o - <( - :0 ~ w 02/20/2004 FRI 08:28 FAX 02/20/04 09:23 FAX 727 4428844 . .1/012 !GOIO RIVES . RIVES.P~ , ;). ). 11..." \, I Prepared by and R8lLlrn to ; I Howard P. ~es, m Rivea & RIves, P A 1285 S. Myr"ll Avenue CIeerWater. Fl 33756 . .~. ..Pf~"r. . '7 \ . ....At, ..~ ........... QliltJ,ji .-."- Cl(AAfr == ~~ . DGDI\I1'~ DlI _ ."y ------- ~~ ------ :~ --..... fCllll1. Sf-~ f.i.6~.~ . ;', Ci.(,80.50 $.00 'J KAUBI F. IE lUlEL l1ERK If lUT '-/ PDnI.AI CIIJITY. ~ C1'l/) .. . ~l2XOO or-3lH!IXI3 14;52:" UI 51. &ifI1JD.DIIQEOO 00Xl06 II:0326'1m 1(:12lJ!i9 lFli:~ EPG:~ RmRDItIi lXI2 Pm 1 . SlO.50 1m ST. - IIl219 1 15.''IIl.00 TOT/l: CIfD( .. maJe: BYcItn.A. 1lPInY~ 03-267~7 . .JiJN"30-Z!Cl03 2 ! 5:1"" F'INEl..UlS CO !It 128Slil PO 1649 IMIIII..IIIIIIIIIIII Made thi6 27'" day or June, A.D. 2003 between D. ANNE NICHOLSON, . sIngle woman. hereInafter called lt1e Grantor, whose' address is B!C VIrginia StRKlt. Ap8r'tmelit 316, Dunedin, Florida 34698, to LEONARD CHETKlN and MARY CHETKIN, his wife, whose address is 701 Washington Street, Key West, Aorida 33040, hereinafter called the Grantee: (WIt_, IBM he-. ........... 'granIClI" _ ....nte.. _ IN:/lKIe aIIu,. pMI..1o l1li, __anoll/la _. ~ ____ ..NllarMolgM C1.IIlCllvldulllt. DIl~ "'a........- ~.... C1f. ~.) Witnesseth, That th8 Grantor, for and in consideration ot the sum ofTen 001181'5 ($10.00). and other valuable considerations, receipt of which Is hereby acknoWledged, hereby grants, ballJa1ns. end sells unto said Grantees, their heirs and assigns, the following described land, situated lying and being In the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: . Property AppllIisers Parcelldeotiflcatlon (Folio) Number. 02129/15100000/21010600, 0700. 0800 THIS WARRANTY DEED Begin at the Southwest comer of the Northeast 1(4 ot the Northwest 1(4 of Section 2, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Plnelle. County, Florida; thence North 300 feet; thence East 50 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence North 367 feet; thence East 287.6 feet: thence South 367 feet: thence West 261.6 feet to the Point of BegInning. Pan:eIID #02129/15/00000/210/0600 The South 300 feet of the Wesl337.61 feet of tt'll; N.E. 1/4 of the N.W. 1;4 of Section 2. TOWnship 29 South. Range 15 East LESS the South 100 feet and LESS the W88t 50 feet thereof for road right-at-way. Parce' 10 #02/29/15/00000I21010'T00. The South 100 feet of the West 337.61 feet of the N,E, 1/4 of1ha N.W. 1/4 of Section 2, Township 29 South, Range 15 East. LESS the West 50 reet thereof for road right-of-way. Pare_liD #02/29/1S100000l210/tJ800. . Subject to easements and restrictions of IllCOrd, if any, .and taxes forthe year 2003, and subsequent years. . Bei"g the same lands as conveyed to the Grantor In OR Book 8873, Page 911, Public Recorck of Plnellas County, .Florida. And said Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and wlfl defend the sarne against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. . In Witness Whereof, the saId Grantor has hereunto set her hand and seal this day and year first. abo\le written. ~~h~ ~ r,~ c-- ~~~ , ~ #;iV~r/ /.K ltI'er ;;r- ~~J~~~/ ~Al 5aIl'MF~_o::.; Prtn NaIlIt /P. ~L /1h"~~~~;. D. ANNE NICHOLSON Sod 11Sl.Z6ZS0E u~~~a4~ ~wwa pue p~euoal dlO:EO VO EZ qa.:l OZ/ZO/2004 FRI 09:29 FA! U~'&V'U4 u.;c~ r4A (~I 4.~.O.. '- STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF PINELLAS: , ~l'~~ . .1W~~.rA j....... .01Z lIllUl1 ,-' fLA F'1~~~:i ~~y pG 1649 on'."" . J hereby certify that on this day appeared before me, D. ANN.,. NICHOLSON, personally known to me, or who produced identification, and who executed the foregoing Instrument and acknowledged to and before me that she executed said instrument for~~ PUfl'oses therein expressed. WItness my hand and olflclal seal at the City of Clearwater, County of Pine . of Florida, U;~d.yofJu".. A.D., 2003/~....... .,r;int Name: Howard p. RiVeI; 11 NIIIIIry Pubic: Statl of j;lOrIda Patsonally know'l:J.:::: Prrxluced IdenlHlcetion: _ Typ.. of ldenIIfIaIlIon ProcIuc:8d: S.d , .' .. ,y....-J ..;..~....., i.f: : ,;.' ...IDJ'''-........,.;., "' wr~.....-.rl._ ......... ~.~ 119l.aSaSOE u~~+a4o ~wwa pue p~euoaI dl0:EO ""0 Ea qa.:l 02/20/2004 FBI 0':2$ FAX 82/Z0/04 DI:ll ~A1 1Z7 ttZG844 , .012 _vu"' JU vt.:) . Kl YI::ll. rA AaaaciIIion Oton8t's M*~ . OWNERS 7T1IE lNSlQlANCE POUCY Attorneys' Tide Insurance Fund,. Inc. ORLANDO, FLORIDA SUBIECI'TO 1l~ EXCLUSIONS mOM COVERAGE, THE EXCEFIIONS FROM co'9DAGECONl"AlNED INSCHEDULE "8AND THE CONDmONS AND STIPU- UllONS,AlTORNElIS' TI1'LE INSURANCE FUND. INC., a F1oridacotporatioD, hen:in called Tlie FuGd. insures. as ofDar.: ofPolicyahown in Schedllle A. against 10m or ~e. not exa:cc1ing the Amowl.t of Insurarice "r.ued in Schedule A, sustained or incuried by the iIISarc:CI by l"e2IOn of: 1. nde to che csi:ace 0.. inten:st described in Schedule A being vat.cd other than as stated thc:reiD; 2. Any defect in Or lien or enc:ulnbnoce on me tide; 5. UlUIIlUt.erabiUtyofthc tide; 4.. Lack of a right of access 110 and from the land. The ~u ~1l al$o pay the ~osts, auomcys' fees ~d ~DSeS incurred in ddel15C of ~e IUle, as UllUl'ed. ~t only tQ. the exlcnt proVided J.tJ. che Conditions and SlipuJa.. ao~. ' In Wirluss WMrcvj. A'ITORNE'VS' mt.E INSURANCE roNDo INC. has caused Ibis policy. to be .ed and sealed as ofIbre ofPoliq shown in Schedule A. the polley to bc:comt: 'VaI1d ~ counlCDigncd by an autlloNcd sigDatory. . ~...!1S' Tide l:Ds1muaee F.... IDe. By ~~.. CUrIe5 J. KoftI.esIri Praidaal SERIAL OPM- 2312460 I'\lNO FOAM 01'1oI (MY. llIIl8) 11 .d 1191.aSaSQE: u~~~a40 ~wwa pue p~euoal dEO:EO VO Ea qa.:l , .RIVIiS & KlVI!S.J'A IXCUlSlONS fRO" COVllRAQ: .' , . '.' -cxdWMk - __rlae~ofIlllsPolicrmdn.e'uv.d..~"IoaCll'dlmacc:.cao..._.".' lltc 1ioII--. ...lldl - .......-, _- Ices or ~ ....;cb arite '" ....- of: tal.-qul.liOA (iAdudiJlg bu. ....lillliu:d '0 bIIildiag....d ~ng!awl. ordill_ or ~) 1. (a) ~Ia.. CIIlIiIIuocC!or ~a' ,..(I) rhue.."'.....,.UK....cojo,IDenroflheland;(il1 ~~r.~1IlaI.Iioosor\oalbon -~ r"l.:.ad~h~cr~ 00 rhclmcl: (iii) ,ucponli_in_..llip ondw>p '!' ~d.__.urn~dleloRd or..., ~~ doe bod 1& or_ ..pan; or rIY) caoiIocuDcDcaI pro~rloD, or rlae r:<<ca.otany'liola~ oflhcsr:laws. ordiraa..:::.... or..., aI ro:gubIioIu.accpttolhe u\l!'.lll dw..R04icD ord\e~d\eI'eo(af'''DOOCC ""....--.,Iir!' or~~ nc ~MmCft . aIlqS ........1lIlectiA<< &he land .... bcCIll _rded ia obc public n!COf'lls .., o...e of ..,. . &om .. oloIa_ or ardudcd ~ ( )-. ClIlCqM to dac _. rh.,.. OoDa: vflhc cxcrdor dIcnof or .. noDCC of a . (l>) JuIof B""""""'eaIaI ~_~" ~_ WoI:Jti;;'O~_II_dviolariPl:afIcclinc tbc IaNlhas """" rr:conSc4in tbcpll1ltic ,,,",,du,D,,,.. delea.lieoCll'_b.....cc..,......ng~.. -..- 2, :;.~emiDCllldoaoaioun\cso_dCl:oI'bc~lhcr"f~'-~;;:"'..::;:::-..::s~~u~~~::~ lromcavenar:""l'taIlOIIg'f\lidl....-.lpnD'IODaleO '-1 I, . '. " ~e~ ad-.ccl:ailllaor.~~~~:__ . tOo) crcaIlIOd....ral, _cd or ~ ro by ...C..._ __I; .' (1)) oot.....;..,....'Iha,...... ___lIcd.in ~ pulIIienccmb acDMeaofPaSq. _...._10._ i.-d ~""'ftOtdlodosed'" 1frilioc to Tlle flIncJ '" die illauRd ~l pnor ID IIIe dale Ihr: 1..-...1 cbi....... ~ - inaR1:<l unclcr ohis poIiq: (el .....ulliag _....tau... d-.:e CD die ........... d.......r: (dl auadoiac tit (IlClIre4..-..q.....110 Date ofPoliq; or . .. (e) .....liaciD looIor~wbich_1d _..... beao\lOClliDcd iflhc ituIIredd:llmaAtlnd paidwaluc Iior Ihc COWl: orwaal_d .... ~~whu:t. ariMs OULef~ ttmaailm ~Ia lIac iIIIuml the estate or~ imurcd br fhk policy. br'-'" oflhr: opuation or federal b:aD1tnpIq. '''''" iNoIwaKy. Ot simillr cndiron' ricblS laws, tMl is based 0/1: (~ rhc~~dae ClDIIr: or _ICtal imu<<d br dlis poliq'lociag Ikcmed a~~c or fnDdulcnt II:IIUM: ~ (II) die ~ cnaliDc doc _01''''_ __ br rhlopoli"Y bciIIr"""-da ,....cacallalcraalCcrcsg,pl ""- dot: pn:faauial lnDIfeI' -.IIa *- .....1IIIIwe: (I) .0~ft_."IIe~'ortnllll'-.... . . (Ii) ef""'" _.......... '-' 1IGdce to. pa-.. _...... .... lI~t... '~D cn:dk.... 02/20/2004 FRJ 08:25 FA! 02/20/04 08:20 FAX 727 ..26'.. ~05/012 ~l CONDrDONSMm ~'110N5 J. ~"'T_ llt.. IoIlcMoODc __ """" UIIId ill dID poIiq-= (a) "iDsurcd', theiDalnd DaIIIeCl iDScbcduIe A, .......IUl!ieftto...., ri&blll ordd'_ The Pl.oIld...,..zd IIaoe hadapombcn....rdlmUftd. ,,- who...-l'" die iADcK oflhe NilIle4iDJuoed br..,....1ioA of law _~ 6aID....rdaw iAehdiIIe.lKaa..........IO.Ihia. dDtriIIIo.... dr:fttcco....--.. pcr--=d r~ 0_ oflrlD. or ~nlC orllcluGarr JUUaoon (b) "~~": ~ iaNrcd clairnIas '-or d....... (e) .lalowtcdF"OI' ",,--, aau:oJ laIow\r:daC, nOl ~ ....~ or_wIIirb w.ybeimpuleClllOaD...... "'......... of Cbe pubIic.-lds .. cIdi8ed in dIG policy O,~)/ odIer........ wbick iraparl..-__1IOCice aofIDII_ ~ die luId. (d) "Iu.d": Ibe Iaod dacribcd << ~ lD iD SdIeduIc A. aod iIDJW_u dSaaI rhcC'CtA ...... by law -oanc ral ~ TIle _ ......... dO<S _1Ild...., pnpc:n)'bc:rOOId .....liaaaofrhc ....... dcKrihcd a....clcrrcd to ill SchaIuJrA, ......,.rigllt. ridc.__ _<<_cutiD "buaiIlcJtrCClJ, .......-_ allcJs.laacs. waJa 0<< ~ bar DDrhiftC baa.. shalL -oify or IiInll rbc _ Co "lUdI II Iich< tJI_ID uIl en- tbe bad. iDImaI "" dIis policy. (II) ..........: ~ cited of ...... _. deed, 01' DdIcr scr:uriqI ;GIII\IIIlC6I (l) "pMlK _Dnla', ft!CGrds ~d UDde. ....... _ at dalA: or Poliq far !he P'I'P'* aof -.:arUaS ~ DOrice of __ rdaIinc tollClll prapcny ... putdouen r.... 'VIIJuc .... ...about ~ W'''''' rapca ID liccIIolll(a) (i\<> 'Olllwo bduoioao hili eo-:ag.:. "public:nocanIs' _Ihl...iftduclr: ClPlroa....1aI proIeCtioa llr:ll:afllcdiA tile ~aofthe cIcrllofllle UairledScu:o diotriclCOlllft for die disIricI ill w/aida die '-I illocau:d. (g> .UftID~ aof rbc cidc.: .... alIepd or "fP'"RD' _r alI'eclliag dlelide IIIrhclmd, -.aduded ....~r.-~. wbIcb -.Jd colid.. ............- aofrhc arat.. or iDrent& da:ribcd '" 5ch~c A.ID lie nIcued,..... die ob\ipIi'" to purch_ by9inuc: of a ~...-.Iid...............,.......-, of~ dde. !. (~.._...oI"""""'_~aEr... Tltc CG9'Cl"I'" aof... poIiq..... -..1_... fon:c as fIlo... eC Pelky ill lImw of... i~ onJF SO lllGC "" rhe ........., re..... _ _ or ImCJ'CIl ill Ill.. Iaod, o~ 1IoIcIa.... ~ 0CCUft4 '" II JlUI'dI- moioey-.ce e:l- ..,.~rn. d1eias.-l. oroalflO.lo.., :as rbc iDaur:d sh:olI h.Dc 1Q~ '" '- aof ~ of___IF ........ .., rbo: iDJur'cd ill ..., nasIicI' GI' CIIlIlft:JllDCC aof rhc _ or inlO:ft'SC. 'ThisllOliaosllall._continur: Intoco: in,....,. of aofpwdaoac~ .'d 11Sl.aSaSOE I'roIIllbc imurcoI oCcitber (i) lII1_e orlnrae&tilllbc I:and,.. roil :all iadebccdDtJs k'OIrod ., II putdIaIc -.,. IIICIftClIF en- II> ..... insured. . ", N........, a.o.. or.... Gi.-..,...... ~ l1tc _.. oIW1 aoDfy The T uIIII proGlpdJ iD.....1ing (i) ill QII: 0{ any IiIipIiocIU.r:Ifmh IaSerdoa 4ta) bdDw. (i) incase '-"'clIceshal1 CGIftC to_ inN.....a herwadcr of..., cbriuo otri~ oria_ wlUch Is . adYerIe II>lhe ddclOw_" ----. aoiDlUn!d,.:ODd wIIicIIlDip' r::auJC ~ or~ r_wIIido 11Ic- J\auI..." be fill""..,...... of this policy. .... rlii) if ride '" .... alaIe4I\';--' as ...--. is rejeacd lIS __1r&abIr:.1Crm-ptDOlia:..... _ be P9M1O 'he F....... dIen... ... tbcla.-d"'lI:dliIkrof'Ibc: F-"~..."'rec-lItolhc _1IiCI' or __ lDr which p.-pc IIODcr U ~~ pmridcll. "--'.!bat fail..... ID Mlify1'bc PUIIIl sItalI iD DO caoc prc;..dice the ripa of UJ I-.cd _del'. dIIa pcoIiq ....... The r..od oIWl ~ ~ '" doe W..... 0IIld rhaI 0IIIy 110'" _ aofllle pn;ju4ia. of. Dca:- ....1\0 .... _., ~ Dootr .r ~ a.o...aa To CeoopadIe (a) UpolI..nnm""'l'lCK by du: iDlare4aadNbjur... d\r:opcioos c.cwaiJlcd iD Scm- 6 ardlexColulid.-.:and ~.1hef\mcL al its OWII '-' and wilIloat DRnOIIDDObIe cIe\e.y. slIail pnooidc lor !he c\cfcwc of.... imurcd. ill Ii..-. lea wIIiI:b uq dUnI. pIlft)' ...,.,. a dainu"MnelD du:lidr:a'ImaacMimuIn. buloalyu ID ~...1Cd causes 01 ac:,*, aJIeglgra dellta,1len oromculllllllraDc or Dl!oer Daue, iaooItcd ..... '" Ibis poIiq. ne Fuad sbaI1 ....., lbc ripe to sei<<l CDUDId of iD choice (..1geCl '" die rip< tJllbe lIIIurai ID objca f.... ~-....IlIe _) lD ~l tbc -..- _ '" ~...1Cd c:aoas aof __ MIl _11 lUll beliablc ltJr.and..... ..... pay die fees aof IIlIJ other CIIJIIGOCl. n.c FUIld will..... pay .,lIca. cwu .. ~ iDcum:d by rheim\lre4l ita..... ~ ofdlole c:a.....oracri_ wI&icb aIL!sc.:adCn not iaNrr:d IpiNt by dU poUq. (II) ne J'uncI sbaII....., tile ripl. ",Its _ CIlIt, to iDorilllte and pnII<<1IIc aDY acdon or ~or ID.... any oIhA:r ace ..hicb in ti apa;.. ""'" lie ace....., 0' . e to CSClIbIisb 1IIc tiIk to the ,",cuc or "'_ as iIIsured. DI' to ~c DI' ndIKC _ or a......, to Ibc iDIurelI. The FuDllmaycalteuqappnopria..,;.... ~ l"" _ 0{ tbio poGcy. ....cdICr or not i. sllaII be 1iaIIlc Iu:reuad.... ...d Ilnl1I _ Ihenbt' _1i..bi1i~ .... _ .., pruoioIan aof dlg policy. II on.. fUnd dWI ~ ja rigIw UDCIcr tbU ......... li ob1i11 do 10 dilill'"ady. (,,) Wbeacwer1l>cfuadsllall '-" bIrcIvpc aD acrioo 0I'1ftaIpaacd " .wc...c as ~ 01' ......llcld by rbc pnwisiau at Ihu poIOty. 'tbe u~~+a4~ ~wwa pue p~euoaI dlO:EO .0 Ea qa.:::l 02/2012004 fRI 08:%8 FAX 02/20/04 U9: ZJ. I'~ 44211". , _012 ... UVoil ~J~~~ * K!Y~~.~~ Aft6rneys' Title lnslU'.D~e Fnnd.ln'c. OWNER'S POUCY Sclledwe A Policy No.: OPM.23124tiO EffecIiye Dale': JIIIlC 30, 2003 @ 2:S1l'M A&ea~' Yale Relbalce: IS1JN~1aoa AmOUDl of~ S810.000.00 I. )faau; or lDsan:d: r.-nI 0aeIll:iII .. MIlly Cbcdlm, his wife ,', %, 1bc estm: or ~ ill Ibc IIIId d::M:Dbcd h=JII aod wbidl ~ ~ by lb. policy ill a _ simpIc (if ollla. spoclfy ~ IIId ;. at .... etrutiw cIate bacof _lIlll ia .... aamed ....., .. sIIaoft by iDstnaaat rccorde6 ill Of1icial Records Book 12&". Pap 1641, of... publiG teGllrds ofPiDdlas Cowdy, ~ 3. 'IlIc JalI4 rc:fi:m:ol \0 ill dIis paJK:y ill cIac:ribed u fi>u-s: 11aa1 put ofwNWll4 oftha NVlU4 oCSeGtioD Z. TOdIDSbip 29 Sooth. RaDac 1$ Eastman paIticuI;dy cIacribclcI 011 ElIIIilIir -A- :oltlCbcd ~. L~ AI,eah SipalaR B-.d P. Ri9cs m haaiDa ACCAt a-ua P.lUYa, (D IIUV8S .. .RIVES, ..A. U65 S. M)I1k A__ CkU'W'&Cllr J.n. 337Sti F_ OPM.scH. A "....II!J8) 4AlIaI" E'd YY91.~S~SOE u~~+a4o ~wwa pU~ p~~uoaI dYO:EO pO E~ qa.:l 02/20/200' FRl 09:2. FAX UZ/ZO/U. D~:Zl YAK 1Z1 4.Z.8.. , KUIll> . K.ln::a.I'A .7/012 ICI UUti Aftorueys' TItle Insuruee Fund, In'( OWNER'S PQUCY ScbeduleB l"oIil:y No.: OPtwl-23 12.4&0 ,,&_5 FiIco 1t.c:fcn:as;c; I SJ3N"u:bDIsm 1bis policy cloa IlOl ~ apiu 1_ 0I".w...,.. by ~ ordu: lulluwiaa ,a:cqnIOD$; . 1. l'Ixcslur 1bI:)'CII' ofdle e8i:oIM: cbIc oCIbis poHc:y _lues or Spcclal___ which we DOl sbcItnl_ ~ IiaI8 by Ihc pablic-.lf. 1 Ilipe 01 clQD.s ofpriel ial pOSIeSIiOD aut rhowD by lbc pllbw.--. 3. ~ avabps. ~ _ cliapma. mil .." olber __ ...u:h _aid be cliscJoseIl by an _ lnIIW)' aIId iupcctioa of.. pRIlliscs. 4. E_ ardailllS of__ IIiOIsIwwD by 1hepub~ recardL S. """lieD, 01 dgbllllla _, fall' __labar, 01'___ henIDfbrc cwhcnaftet fiaDisW, -JIOICd by law_ Do( sbawo by 1110 palIk---. 6. A1Zy advw5e --.. cl:oiPl. by Ibe Sail: of Florida. by rick of ~ 'Ill ..y partioe or lbc .... ias1aaI ~ct, iIIc1udiDc nIlaMqed., filled md artificiaD.y cxpoocd ....ds, ...., Iudf -=d Ia ...... ieuIL. 7. ThDlIalofal11U. flit_year 200J_lIIId~. wtUcb -1IOI)llel:duc mIIp8J1bJc. 8. ~t to PIarida p.....,. Cmp. z-.nW in Deed Book: 1614,l'Ip 8S .....1IIIIdi6al ill O. R. 80Gk 3000. hec 321 of rlodubllc ~ of1"iodJu CcNaty, flcDIL 9. IIIlIII& 2 IIId 5 IlIIovc _Ilcnby lIeJeIe4. F_~1J /I'll< J/PfJ -.. 01 'c1 1191.aSaSOE u~~~a4o ~wwa pue p~euoaI c1EO:EO ..0 Ea qa~ 02/20/2004 FKI 08:27 FAX 02/20/04 09;21 FAX 727 4426144 , RIVllS . KJV~.I'A ~' ~. '-' EXHIBrr "A- .Bq. allIu: ~ct1II1t#:rof.~ 1JI iftfw:NartIofm 1/1 '-f'&eaitm 2. TowdD) nSGud&. RIlDQlr 1$ ~ n-rt-~.Fb-iok ~Nl1'Ii JOOf<<1: ~ EaJr SOjW . to tIxP"'~~ tlM:na:Nat83Dfed:~.Emt2B1A~: llu:s=s-h JG1frct; ~ Far 2B7..6fa:llDIMPoUl1D/~ . :1M ~ 300 f"' IIfrlle weir m.6i fed if the N..E.' JJ..I tJfIthe N.w.. JJ4 fIfS<<IJ- 2- T~29~ /l6ngc IS Emf: I..ESSIbcSatlth JOO,prandUSS dJc Wen 5(/ f~ rIrarDf JirrIDtMi~. . . 11wSoIllIJ()OftdttftN,,"JJ7.61J'uufdocN.E_ Wt8tbt:N.:r. U4I1fScaial2. i~ 29.so.Q,~ IS Easf, LESSdIe"_10f_ rMrcofflvT<<JritIIIS~. soa 11 Sl.aSasOE: u~~+a4o ~wwa pue p~euoal ./012 "UUf aEO:EO VO EG qa.:l , IUY~ "JUY';S,I'A 02120/2004 PRI 01l:!7 FAX O:/~O/O. O~:22 ~ 7Zr-.42BS4. FWKlfna, ~ a.ar Illlpioa CD &aal4er_iaalioa by a ~R.,(' CllalpclClll jurilllicliGn aDd upn:sdy ..,... 11>" d&hl. 1ft &Ii sol" diIcftli_. to appcaI r.-IID}' Illoc:rx~l or ~rr. (d) In aU cases ~ Ibis policy (lCftIIl1l or requa-a lb. P\mcl1O ...-aolC or pnnlde for \he dd'eme olllD}' aaiun or pnlCCC:lllinc. the iuun:d dl3II11CCU1'C lO The F\Jacl tile rigbllO 10 ~ 01" ~ .we- ill lJIe :aclIaO or ~ md .n apptab ~. and pcnnit The PImd .. ...... .... iIs opdoa. IIH: name oflbc iaI"""" for lbi. ~ Wht:_~by1iad\...d,lhciBsurcd,""IhcFwld" apcmc. ....11 pc The Alad "" te:UOIllIbk aid (i) ia lID}' ~ or ~Ar. xcuriar cw.......... -.;"i"f. wi_ prooccaliDs or oIcfoadto( \be action OC' ~ or clIftIi8c aclllcoac-c. and. (ii) In ..., _ lawful _ IdIIcb ia Ibc opinloe oE The 1-.1 ..., be IICClIOIIatY or ~ u> alaWish tho !ide 10 Ibc a_or _rest.. iasllRd. If The fIIad .. ~ ..,. me f..u,.rc of daD iamrccl ft> funUsh lhe required ~~ ~ F~"". ~ ,II! ohe insural UIIdct Ibr pollCJ'" lI:'I'nIiIlaI&'. iDduclinr lID}' Iiabilicy or o1llipioa CDdcCa\d. pnlICCIQ. OI'CODlboua lID}' BdplioA. w1dll'elP"l ... die __ CIt IAIIItcn ~ svdI mopc:ndoa. S. r...htI-_u-p Ja Dddi...... CD aIId _\be DOlic8 requil'ed uada-SeaiOll ,ot~ Coudi&iaaI aad SOpuI_ haft beea J'"l"'Wcd llIr Fund. a proof ve ... or ~gl: Ii(acd MUI """'"'" 10 by /he m-ri elm- abaIJ be l'umiohcd 10 Thc Fua.I wi\lbft 90 do:,- afr.u \be iasan:d cbiawI, d>aI1 a_...... the flocg ping rioe to \be"- DW...... The praol ol..... or ~ JbaIIdOSo<ribc the delcn;". ora OC' .......1Il~... _the lid... ......-_.u..utedapiult..,.dlispoliq~COGI<ilu""lIH: lraoi& orIOll.............. _ .a.n_. IOdwl _lpoooilllc.lhc bub of c:aIcuIallDa' the ..._ ol\be .. or damagr:. If Tho: F""d .. prq.,dit'ed bJ dac Wille ol the u-w ~ CD pnMdc dlc required P<<OIlII ollOll 01" ~ The Fuad's obIlpdom 10 the IDIured lIIIder 1lla po>Iicy .... ~. Ind..dia<< u, Idbility or obllpdOlllbddio""- ~.OI'C8IUi..-IID}'U"", wIdlttpnl ... 11M ....... cw _IS ~UUiag ouch pmol olloss 0{ dIoIftaIe. lA.....lion. dacinowW daiInaIll....,re:Qooably bercopoi-a ......_. 10 CDIIIk>alioe 1IIIdcr.... by ..,. aIIIJaorilocd l'qIftRAaodw: mTbc Fud..... ~a11 prooIlKc rc. ..-;"aliOD. iuopccO_ aIId cllflYlar. ~I Ndo ........alll~ ti_ MUI P'-" ...,bc ~ by ""'Y audio- riatd rcprcH:lllaOwc: ofTM PlIDd. 3II-.b.lloob, Iedgt:n. cIaccb. wm:opaadcnoe and ID~ 'IlIIellu:I- bcaI:iIlf a dale bd'orc .... elW- Due or polky. wbIcb ~ ,..naia liD lbc lea at clamage. "'nIIc:ir.lfreq...,.."aIlt'...,....lIIorizcdco:pnseruariooc orn.c r....... rbc Innrcd cIaimaa,1haIf gnm Ill............ iD wriling. ..... aay audio- riled wepraeaari... ol11a~ f\md .. ....._ iaopcc. _ CCIpJ ;oil I'l!CcndiI. boob. Jcdaen. cbecb. ~ md __....... in the nKOdyoc_lnIl of" d>ifll"...,...bich ~pet13in ID the - or ~ AD inComlacio6 daipaccd III -.lidmlial by Ibe iDnmI daiawu:pnWded CD TIle Puad ~ CD dIIt SeeliG.. dIaII He be diIcIoY:dlO ocben uaIao.... cIlc ~judpacnt orne IImd. it isD~iIl die ~ ollhc daIa. t~ orlhc Ruurcddalmaut.........Ic*ca:auai............,.ado, ptOchu:eodaer -Illy rqllCAed ~ 0&' cr-< pcrmioRoa liD _IIR rea- -w, -, i.4.....liooo..... IbInl poRia ... n:qulnd ia lbD . pancnp,,"hall mnuiu.e..,.Iiabilioy..rn..."",.. uocJ<<dlUJlGIi.,.... ... diu cbia. ,. ~ To ..,.... 0IIr0eItriR ScIIIe a.-..; T~ 0( Go..,. IA CIIIC of a daIlD UDder this poli"J', n.~ "ulld abaIl ~ doe loIICOIing oddilioaaol.- (a) T. ..,_T.....~el_"-t of:r...-. To payor lI:ndCIr(I'I7IUCUold.c __.of'IA:.ar.u>a: -",,",lI>is po!icy ""C'=dlcr widlllD}'~. ........".. loa ud ClIpC:DICI iDI:lIrrod by itae lDIuftd d.......... wNcb...................... bpn..: "YDd, lip liD lbe chac: or ~_ or lC1IcIc:I' of J81IIl"DI aaol..11icb n.c PIInd is ablifl'QCtl1O per. . Upoo _ ""......... by The JUud ol drIs opliOll,. aU IiabililJ MUI oblipo lioaaCD lbc Uuund IIIldcrthispGliey.olhcrlMn 10-" d1cP'9""'"c requiftd. 5baII ~ iaclutliAc any IlabWQr or oWipliuu 'ID delead, poo_. ... _tin... ...,. ~ _ d1c potier sb:al be rumnclCRd... n.. t\uuI.....~ (b) T. ...,_0"---.................. 0....._........... WWG'" a...n~ (i) 10 ~ or odlenoIse ICGIc with ocha- JIIlIIlia Car or In lbe _e oE an Insuml ctoimaId uay cbIim iDaurcd ......t undcr _ policy. ......rhoa- with DAy C1I&", aIIDrDCJ'S' ~ aud C>IpCIIIClI incOltnocl Sod 1191.aSasOE: ~/012 ~ by Ihe Insurccl dai_ wbich -<< "~ori~ bfThc: Fund up 10 the Ii_ '" pafD\<:Dt...s . .10 'The FuDd... ~ co P"r- ot . (iI) IDpII)'oro'to..iwiscoeukw>dI chciusarcd claimu>llheloH or obma;e p.....<181 for WIder tbis pol..,.. ,00000hCC ..w. "'" ~osu. attom..,.' fees....d ecpeI\5CS incwrcd by die ......'" claiannl 'Wbidl ..- amhon...d bylbe fund up 10 .....lime <<""""en.;uod ..bich The fun,!".. obIi.-d 10 pay. UpO<\ rbe C1tac.... ""."I1lc Fuftd of cith... of lb" "I'1iona ptotidcdlor in ........Jlbs lb) (i) or (ill. The J'und'. obIip.......IO Ihc: i.....-a.......... 1M policy lor- dlIe dllimed IoIss .... d_l\gC. orher lUn Iho: ...,..-11 oequlrccllO bc ...... IlhalllaIDiaau:, indud"mg my 1id.iJi., Dr obIip Iioa 10 deleAd. .............. 00 _.... an, li..plion. 'I.Do... . ~~_ofL\llWilr_Il:. --. This pGIitf is a COIllrKI ol iDdcDlDilJ opiDK lICIUIIl ......el:lJy !os- or ~_tained....incutftdbJlhc iaauJ'edWoi.ua, ....o~sullem J_ oor "...."!:" by 1ft-' of mauen inlvted against by Ihk poIi.,. aftd ....., lD lb~ cxtml bcIdu dacrihcd. (.) lbellabilf&J'ol"nleJ'uud~ dlIispolieJ'" ..otell~1he Iasl of: Cl) Ihe """"'At or I~ ....cd u. Schedule A; or, (il) \be cli8iarcacc IIebOCa> doe ftlllC ofw luurcd ...~.. or a:1IC1"QCaf in_ad"'" lbe.!.... ollllc.......... _ oiinlerCSUlIbjcct 10 <he okf"...1lca .... CftQOIDbcana: iDNmJ apiaIt bJ thO policy. it' /77rif""""""~C&~"""-'-"~ .,.....) (c)"'" 1I\...oh,1I1 payOG\yth_COIU. at.lOf'Dcyo' fcaaftd ""PCftlCS incum:d In acco_-w. ScaiaD i oEdIesc Coadilio... andslipu- lali_ a. ~I'f' 11__'" If Ihe Iaad dac:rl.bcd ia SdedWc A ......... of.- or more ~ wbIcb art: _....... as uingk PIe.....s a .... is ..lIlWilloed llIfcCtiD~ OIIC ""....... aC\beparcclablll_aILdIc__ be~dandaeukd ... ~ pnl". blllG" if1he _I of~ Imdorll>io poIiq... diWlcdpnnala .,Uollu: aluconDaK ofrolicy..reaAJe~parcd ... dlc wbolc:. acluivc DC...,. ..................D DUde ......q.....llo D:atle of1'clicY.1>dJeu aliabilq ...."31_ ... odamoioc becD agreed upon as lOeadt parcebf'J'he.....dal\drbe...u.rcdu IN: u-olCbc Q.nIan.., oflbispolicr aIId .~ by oa ellpr.... awacn, or",.... mdOllClllCIII :waehed 10 .... poliey. S. 1.ieoIlIiIia. of UeIMIily (I) Itn.. f\uId alablialt...lIIc lidc.... rclDOOQ dlc alIccal dafca. liea or eo_bntIec. orCUftlrbe bckota ri!;h. ol OCC....lOor fnm rhc land. or __lbc daia 01 ~or...... aD as i..lORd. iD ~ ~ clWrcnl_r..,. any -........ incladicoJ Iitipion aDd the -.pIaioD ollll7 appeals Ihcrdraaa. illI>aIJ haw: IbDJ perfOnncd ill obliplioltowilb rcapcct 10 daI_and >hall Dotbe Ibblc lor '""7 ... ....1IamaCe c:amc:d dlcr~lIy_ (1)) 14.... _ve....,litipliao. iDduclUClilipd8> brnu, l'Uad _with llIrfUncl'sco_.. The FUbd.....llh""" _liallili."foolou or dun.., UDCiI \heft baa beoia a.fiAaI de__limo by a co.Ift or --..-n' juriMliclloa. aad diopooiljon ofall appea\o Ih~. acl- ........ co .1ilIc as iDaun:d. ee) The Puad d1aJ1llO( be liable ......1eD.. clam';' 10 ..., ~ fo~w.biIiq""'""IlUiIy-.l '" the ~iD Jeuling-r....m.... """ .......... ..... priw ..nRCn coasn& a( 11M: F....4. 10. .........'~~...T____ofUolllll'7 AU p:llj'IlICGIS UDder dIb potiq. rxcq>1 JID7IDCO'B .......r t. com. :aWllDrJS' fbsaud e:apemco,dIloI redw:e dIe_"afdlle i.......ac" pro CU""- lJ. UaIliIiIr N",~ . ...... Ills ..,.._, uadcnlaod lbK Ibe _ouIII or iNWUlcc uacln this policy sItaD be .ed...... bJ .., __" TIle Fund ...., par u........lIAy poli"J' iouurias a ......... to wIlidl .-epcIoa is lUao u. SeloecNIe II 01' lDwlUdI..... buund h.."IIftd..........ed.... taken NI!lea. orwloid> is bcTeafllCl' _-' ",.. iAIurcd aud wb;.;h.. ~ ......, ....Iicu on oke eslallt or ;,,_ dacribccI .... .Gcm:d 10 ;n Schedialc A. .... doc -..... pad sIlaD be dccIlIcd ,. paJaleDl under lIriII policy ID ..... iDIlIn:d owner. IZ. r.,......, ~ (al No paJIIICDl sIIaU lie Jaade widloul p.-.o.c \his policy far ~don.aaal ol die pDJaIal! ulllea the poIiq baa bcca ..... .... ..... ......,..s. in ~1o cue pooofof\ocs.... deslnJo:O_.lLall be I\Jrnisbed co dlIc Jalilfactioa of1be Ftmd. (b) Wbcn liabiliry aftd the "'''CDI or 1_ 01' .... l1:li bccrt defiJJlldy fi..s ia Keordancr: wiIh !hac c-dili0ll1 ""d SlipuIalioa.. u~~~a4o ~wwa pue p~euoal daO:EO VO Ea qa~ 02/20/2004 FlI 0':28 FAX 01/20/04 01:23 FAX 727 44ZI.44 , .012 ..uu. KIV~ . KIV~~.r^ Ifli,_ or daaIlop oIW1 be pl?&blc ooid>;- ~ ...,. rhcn:ooMr. )J.~Uf-rw,-t-~ (a) ne5W4'J:8ipIor~ WbcA.... -ow. f\IftCt <lW11oaw ""Ilk" ..... paid a dohol UDda ibis paller. alI....1 IlL oubooplion ""'" _ID n.. F...d u...&acd brao, "'" olthe ~ cbi""-"'L Tbc f\oftd IbaII be IUIw'opIeol U) and "" enllded to :oil rl&bts md KlDCClico whicb \lie inRu'ed ~ _W "- Md aplUl say ~ or rwopcnr iD rapecllo lbc .... Iud ..... patiey Bal b<odl w.cd.ICRqIICSllalIoy The FIand, dlc lI>aoftd cIoimaftllb:oll ~... l'be f\md all rigllll aod .-.Ii.. ..... ...., peaDD .... ~ .-q ia ...... lD pcrtecl 1IW "cbI ol MtIanlprio6. The ill--' cIIiawIl sbaU panDit '.:1i~ F -,clIO sue. -.-uc or oecdc: .. Ib" _ allbe iIuared da'- .mI1O lIIC rhc _ of &be iNurccl claimon. iD M, _11_ or 1IfpI:i0ll ill........ IbaK ricIIII << re.edia. u. JI&)'III- __III. daia "_fully _ IlK _ oldie iIIRftcI daioIuDc, The I'Imd shall be ~ l!o lMJe riaha IDd Naellics io dle 'proponi_ 'OhidI n.. ~'& ,.._ .... 1.0 dae wale __, aCdae loa.. lil_ ._ nsuJllnm UIJ x. oLlba iuurcd c:IaiaulOl. .. sam:cI Uooc. ..... _ obIII na& wItI.. pDIicy. '"" 110c I\aad, III CIwl-r.. .Ju.II1>c ~ II> P"1....ty ...., """ or..,....... i.......... .... by 1M poll.,. whicb dnII __lhc _.. if _y.IDOlIO nelUGll by .- oIlhe I.........., '" l\le Iuurled c&.i_Iof11u: Fund', riP ci~ ' (11) 'fM1"---lIlcb~ Me ......."" ow;p.... "JIKo l'wId'. rip. ol"",,- ...... ---..s .......a obaII _...d oMD iDdwlc. Wbwr Iiaaiad.... dlc ripe'" rhc imullld to Iado!aIal1Ia,. ~ 0IIhcrpa\\da",.......... __do. D~ ~1IIJ'-...COIIIIliliansmnaiad.iD ........iamwDcMawllidl plOOide C. Nbnlpdaa rietall br __ oldris ~ ..~ u-.,..,...,.,,,.,..,.-. ........~. .ru.__ - ~ -..; II{ a. ...... ................. ....,. k --.w i..,....t.. ... 7r..Jqaol - 1M ~........,. ~ ..,......ht_~......,--.,......_nc,...., _,.-.-"....._"'...................,.,..".__Iff7/III~ no _-... aoidI iIs - ... ... ...... of.""" ........... .. - ........~,..,.,....., 110 on.,.aq___~""''' f/fId- ....... .......,jiw...- if.............,.. ",a. ~ IfwlWa ill 'f/I>d III Dt1M '" ~ .... .... .... IN,....... IU -"...,ilorlWc-..p.,...""'......,._.......,,...... if .......,.... _ 110 .-.. -... t- .. ~ ~ ~~~....,...,.~.J ..,te....".,.-.y -~"--f. n.c \alirof the __ oldoe' Iaad abaD apply to An :ulloitnlIoD Ullldcr lhe ndc J-..ance AIbIrnllctA RaJa. A copr of die Will 111.2.7 be vlIlained "- The ....acl1lpOD rC'f""ll. 15. LWaifilr u.bed.. .. PeIlq; Pa&q....... c..... (a) 'T1IiI paky cop:lba' "'cb .0 ~ ;r;my. -.:bed bcncD br The Fuad . doe ca_ pGIiq aacI caa~ IIclwccD Ibc: u-nd mil TheJUod.In ~,""ypnMslDa"'shb polil:y.lhiJ pcaIlqlbd be cOUlnlCd a .. wbGIc. (hI ,..., cJsj,a olio. or ~ ......dlar... 80{ '-sed CD ncc\i. pee. .... tIbidJ IIriIes GIlt of rho. ..... o(!be lidr ta die oesau: or iDlftCIl ~d heRby... a"...,..aioa --"81Udl cbim.1baII lit .-Dacd to dWo pobc:y. (,) No ~[aC... codane.C8lllO.....poIiq CII\ ~ made CIlblpl br a wddac cndoned """- M lIIIKhcd ba1:w siped by eilheo'doe ~ . ~ PraidaaL.......I or'1hc fWlCl. U.~ Ia r.bc_...,prorbIGn oClIooIpco\iq'iolseldlnftJidOt~k 1IAder appIicallle law; die polic.y .... be deaacd _ lD iQd\odf' dw pnoNI_.....IIIl....~ dad .-lro 1ft lidJ foM: UId dtea.. 17. N...... WI-<: Scal.~ AD..... RqUircd.. "" i.. __ TheF8d UId UlJ_tia writing ............ 10 be ........... ~ F_ u.n islelude ... ......... 01'" poIiqand sh.o be _.-d liD The....d M llOJIIliBOpDl vlIia: MPoo. 0IIic<: IIac UlMOO. 0daDd0. Rodda ft86I.86OO. ~ g: !~ ':j . to ft Ii NOS i ~ J1 ~ :!. OJ R.~i! -j?: !~;Ji -:::o- Il SaD e-S" -:-;~ ~18 ~i 'ft p ..:.~~:: Ie-or n l3 oS-a 5 GD..ij!! :;:e !; . C1I ~=.. GlOCll 8 ~ h:~_ ~"'lIf woo g' fJ roo .~~ c ; I iil.i :;-- ,p. ~S l."d 1191.aSaSOE u~~~a40 ~wwa pue p~euoal daO:EO YO Ea qa.:l , . Project Narrative Zoning Atlas funendment Proiect Name: Hi2hland Avenue Redevelopment Plan Introduction The Applicant, Bayshore Broadway, Inc. is the contract Purchaser of the Property and is Petitioning for Annexation, requesting a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment and seeking a Zoning Atlas Amendment. The Petition for Annexation, request for a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment and Zoning Atlas Amendment are consistent with the goals ofthe underlying Comprehensive Plan and the proposed density is compatible with the surrounding area. It follows the pattern of development intended for in:fill parcels and can be adequately serviced by the City. The subject property is approximately 4.4 acres located on the east side ofHigWand Avenue south of Union Street about ~ mile. The subject site is located in Pinellas County but is surrounded on all sides by property within the City limits. The property presently has two (2) 1950's era single-family residential homes that are used by the property owner as rental properties. Annexation will allow for infill development consistent with the urban renewal strategies that predominate in implementing Clearwater's Comprehensive Plan. This type of in:fill will make available reasonably priced housing - which is encouraged by the Plan. While the redevelopment of this property will increase traffic, it is not to adversely affect the current level of service in an unreasonable or disproportionate manner. Water and sywer service is available at the site and appear adequate to service a residential community at this location. The request involves a land use change from Residential Low to Residential High with Medium High Residential District zoning to allow for 30 dwelling units per acre. This application meets the zoning criteria which is designed "to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, stable residential neighborhoods of medium high density , . while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of such neighborhoods in need of revitalization. ..." Site Characteristics and Surroundinl! Area The subject property has a moderate contour and several trees. The property is about ~ mile south of the Clearwater/Dunedin boundary. A variety ofland uses are found within proximity to the site. North and East: The property adjacent to the north and west is High Density Residential and is developed as a high density rental complex consisting of 19 buildings with the associated parking and community amenities. County records indicate that this apartment complex was constructed in 1970. Further north is another apartment complex. At the SE corner of Union and Highland is a commercial center. Dunedin Middle School is on the NW corner of Union and Highland. South: The property to the south is LMDR and is developed as single family dwellings. West: The property fronts on Highland Avenue to the west. Across Highland Avenue is a single family development. Summa", The Petition for Annexation, Request for a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment and a Zoning Atlas Amendment are: 1) Consistent with the underlying goals of the Comprehensive Plan and will further the purpose of the Community Development Code 2) Compatible with the surrounding area 3) Not in conflict with the needs and character of the neighborhood 4) Not going to adversely affect the character of the neighborhood and the City 5) Are not going adversely burden public facilities, including traffic- carrying capacities 6) Are not going to adversely affect the natural environment 7) Following the pattern of development intended for in:fill parcels and the subject site can be adequately serviced by the City. 1 City of Clearwater CDC Zoning Districts 2-401. Intent and purpose Page 2 Lo._.-~, o ~, 0, ' -L_~' _____ '" ' , ~,'''''''..''''''''',' 47,4r- -; . _I 'I , o 10 .- ...~,.....,..... " . _...,~ , . 'l..-_\ ,:-'''.RU '" ,', ~ ' ",0 > ,41; - -:_~. , . - _...- ~ ,"" " ~', " ,- - -- I r--, I ~ '__ ~ : ,___I c I '''t- -. ~ :_----~~ _._.. ~.+ 'u: 'l'1.... 1 I .- - --- ,20tH -... - I : , , o 0 c~o~ -, : ~_O~f , , 1_ _ _ J :: -1"~ , ,- ,- ~--7040 o , --. c - -2-03(1, I., ~ I ~ : -~M~ :-.. ~ , C ., , 2(124 '. o. : : 2008 , , , - -- , '" , ~_l-~_~ ,,/:----: 20fS_ : 2pl;?l- ;. , o , o _, : -- ~ ~063:_ , . _ _ J 2~57 :_, o , 2051 ...... ('J4S~ ~" : : , , , , ~ :b c:: ::0 tJ ~~-RU q~~ - _: ~-~-- 2~---, , , , u ~-- ~~ 2~j 1_ .- , 27117 --; -. , , , 1- __I : 0- -. QJ - -- .. RIDGELANE RD '" '" "- .-- '" -- ~ .-~ I -~~ ~--~: f-- j ~~_J~-~ __----1 L____I "-, -. .... , ~, , , "- <0 ___I ~ :-~_I_~ :_- --_: RU p~~ ~ ;- : "---", -' t~ :___... I: ~ : \.1-''%, :J ~-~--, ~ ~.J,-----~ ~__.-~ u_~ ~\ .~t, \ ~ ,.... I RD' It'. ,,\----'-- ----~ L_ _: ..~ .....__...\ ,___I . : _2_~76 , ,- , I_:~O~ , , -, 2~~~: ,. - --, , , , , J--'-. I . ~I 1~ , 1_ -2fJ82 ,-- ---: I r=:~ '--iW46 ,---I , , , L_ :___-:~O ,- - - -, , , , , :_ _ _2~j6 --, , , , ~ _ _20JO --, , 1_ _ " , 2Q24 r' '1 , , :_.?2l8 ,-, , , :~,---~ ,. '" --.--1 , --I I __.--1. -; - - -., 'I : i ~- - : 1 . - -~ ~ : ---- _ _- I_~ __J L~_--- BYRAM DR ~ ~--- , , ~-I 1 .. __1 -~_: : , , , , . ':..--- 2075 - - '_ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ I - -L _ , . _.. 1 : : I___-------------L__, L_l 1_ _r - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..- -I __. : 1 _ _r- --- --- --- - -,__", , 1_ _ _ ~ ;'.~o ., r' o . , , -!.._I- !wli,wi.~.~.-, Cd ~ : I Cl 'f -. i ! ::_': ,--.--- 206{i. -- -- , , , 1-----1 1 , , , , , , , , , , , r --I , , , , , : , , , , , , , , , ~ :- -; , 0 , 0 , : -. ____~ I-I " ~.. ~ K\-'f ~~ -- ~ ~ ~ :__r~ ~ 1,___ ~ -'--. ~__I-~ .-- , , , , , , , , 1__ J 1--' 1----1 --- :_-~j :_-~::- ~ ..., 'ttT.., \0 -(~..::: -- ...':g -- ~-:_~ :---~~ : I . 1 'I :__,--1 l--~_J '~1 II_~ , , , 1_____- .- - - - - - -.. - - - - ~ - -- - - - - - - . , , l__' , " , ~ (:~: I_~-Y IRU7], - ,__ _ _ J .!%"8; " , ~1969~ Future Land Use Map Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-03002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size (Acres) : Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR Atlas Page: 252A ;--------- RH----- ---: 1 1 I : , I I 1 ~__________.! 1___________1 " , ,. , . , , , "':. ,....~ - - - ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - , 1_ __'- - --- -, - - --- -. - --- - -'__J :1045 r--- , ' , , - --.. RH :t ~ (j) ::t ~ ~ :b ~ .------------ .----_..-----~ 1 II I I II I 1_____..______11______------1 ,...,' ......, . . . . . . . . ,"',1 ........,' , , , '__.J , , :_--- - --- ------ ~ :1043 1---- - --- --- - - _ - ---- ------1 , , , , '_ __r --- - - - -_ __ _ __ _..- - - - - -- (-;! i'--:.J. ......-./~ 1_ _ 0'11 ~ I _...... I l_~1 --.._ ~#~".......... -~. ~,,-: ,', .." " " "~'h~\K\'> ,__ _, ~: -.,.-" ~ ,,0 : : u: ~...... --I__r- --- ~:../,' OJf\h '-.. ....... ""~"':' ',"':l:Q ", ,rj ,--I '-, 19fi5 - __I n"~ 'r;D. ,'....,..." ~, ~... /' . . Dunedin !l! W PROJECT SITE Dunedin .. " TOWNSEND ST ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "II <( THAMES ST I pi! PRINCE PHILIP 57 EENTLEY Sf Location Map Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-Q3002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size (Acres) : Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From: RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR A tlas Page: 252A L _.:2- " '.-..-' ...... II ....., " ' - .'1 I L_.. ,_____. " / ........... ~ ' , ~/........'.........,' 47;41""- -; -, , , iO .." :!;,....,..... \ , ..."" ~ , .- ,- , ,'.....,...... '-.. ,.... ~ - .f' > cr--' \.41, I_~.. ~ ,"" ", - " " _-:.._~ .-~_,n: "'JI,..... 1 _____1...._,----- '2"'" ~ - - I , ,_ __I I ~'205!, : ..-- - --, : 2_~1? , , , 1- _ _' :- -2"Cf4t5 . , , ,- , , L__' ~ - -2M? , '- -, C-2-~ " , , , -~03~ , , , , ~ - - - _I . , , L __I ~ - - --~J24 '- , . __I : - 2~'18 , ,_ _ I 1-----. I ,.--, I __..:', ,___I c : "'t' Q I _~ ~ 'm___~ %:.'-~ ' . \;.:-- -. :_2_~76 20(5_ _ I 2pl;!'l-;' , : ' :___~_I ~063:_ , ~ ~ _ r 2tJS7:_ , , -' 2051 ~ 2~_~, ~ ):.; c: :0 tJ , '. 2~;9 _ : 2'rn;n 2(i!E9- - -, , , L 20~j :_ , , :- ,_I L_ __I 1,017" -; ,- - - - -- RIDGELANE RD g- - "m: .. '" '" "- :m_.~ n~ n~, : _ _' - ~ : I: I L~_J~_: __---~I L____I ........ , : ~ --~ '---~ ~ \ fj ~ 1_ ;;:.- ~~'--.. .-----~ f!...._-~ \ ~'. I I '" /\.n': ~n_: .-' : I_:~l!~ , , ' -, ' 2~~:r C- , , , , .--'-", . ~. , , 1-~'()82 ,-- - --. '-; r=l~ , , '-.{?f)46 .-- -, , , , ,. :___~~O 1-- , , , , , I 20~6 .-- -I , , , , I --I I 2~ .-- - --I : - - ,: : 2Q24 , , ,_ __I .' , , , :_2218 " :. m ~ ~-- : ....-. I _ ~ BYRAM DR "- .. :--~':'-. , . - . ~--- :: ,-, . , :~I---~ "t' ~ ~ ~ l-.~ --_.~ :-~_I-~ __4--~ ---~ [NJDj'--:m: . 2075 _________'--L_, l-~ , , , , , , 1___-------------..__, L_' ,- -' - -- - - - - - - - _.- -, --, , , ~ _ _r - - - - - - - - - - - - ~_ _ ~ , ,-----, I , " , " ~---_.! r --, - -. , , : ' , , , : , , , , , , , . , , , , : - - ~ , , , , : ;'-~' '.' " :: ~ -, - u. MVJ'~ If!JJi l' ~-., <<, ~ : I C ~ - I i ! ::J n, '~ c ': : -: ,- --. -("-'~.~~ "'~-W I__"~ '"'1 ,___ ~ -'--. ~__,-~ --- : , " , , , , , . . \_ _I ,--, ,- - --, :_-~~ :_-~::- ~ ~ 1:5" -'-.~ ~--= \../1l- r___J i~~~J r .---_. -, , , , , ~ _i--: __, 1,_ I _ __ __, : "''' , --;--~'Z_n~ , , l __' -~_: : , , , , ~-----~ 20/?- __ _ n, , , , , , , , . - - - - - - -.. - - - - - - -- - - - - - - . , , , l__1 ,-----------. , , , , , , ..----------- , , , , , 1______-----, . , , , ''''', ~ , . HDR ~"~ : .,.r ::g\_ \\ ..~ ,,' ,- --, ... , , ,_: 1974, ---- .!961T, ./' : - .: ~1-96~~ :~ ~~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ _- _-1 2045 HDR r--~ , , , ' '- - - ~ ~ ~ Ci) ::t ~ ~ ~ ~ ,------------ .----_..------ I I I I :-----..------: :_----------_: ..,' ...., , . . . , . , ' ." -- . -. , , : 1__J , , ,---- - ---------- Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-03002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size(Acres) : Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR Atlas Page: 252A 11043 1----- -- - --. - - - - - -~- - - - ---I , , , , 1_ __~ - - - - - - -- -- - - - _..- - - - --- (-~! i.--:j_ ...--,---~ 1__ 011 ~ I ~...... I ,-=" --,- ~I ,"', '" I ...... " ~,; ',,*, ' fl ~..~....,/ ,..~.. '\ (\ ,~ ,m' -: ,~----_. fJ ~ .....rf:;/ : : '.... ' ~...... ""'7 --I__~- -...- " J b .......,/ qt\ n~t\ ,-...' ....... , , .....,....'00, , ...'1. " , ,''',:l.O " ,....:1. ... ...~.. w ,--, l~k ~ - __I "::D ,'........." ~, /,' Zoning Map . . Aerial Photograph Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-Q3002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue 4.4 Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From: RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR Atlas Page: 252A '" --, .-.-~, II "",. " ' ,II I '--.. .___~~, .. . , . , '. '" . . ~/...../.......,' 47."---; , _I " . . ~ ...---', ..." , - . .- , .. -..., ~ .......\ ", . , '-....,......~ .6 ., >.1~--:.. : '.. . - ., \0 ,,; , 'It' ~' " - , , " ,- - ---, I ..--, '---:0: ::t _" ~ t_____.:! '" ___ II') _.~ , ~ ~ _ J~ I .., " n, ~ ,__ "\\l ---..., -=t , , , ___ ~I L____. r- I ,.._ _ _'_, L__; ~: : ~ : I __, 1_.... ~_ ........... \ . .. . i'~ ~ ~~ "''' ~~ -----~~._- ,.....~ .... .... -" I \.. " I I ;\ -'~\-'--'-- ----~ , ....... \ .' --:._-~ ,+,--: "'1"'" 1 -----. !.._,----- y:;:----: 20t:S_ _ J 2~!i-;': : -, 1__- ... . 12076 1__1 :- --, , , 1_:~~1> , . ' '_, I ~064: r---, , , , , 4--' .., ;:1 " : - ~iN12 .- ... --, '. r";-I" :..,,~ , n. , , , , C. , 2040 , ,-- , , , , : 2~6 r ---, , , , , I --I : 2D:fO ... - --I , : I... _ I : 2Q24 .- , r' I, :_.?2Ja ,-, ,-- - --, :~,---~ 7; '" __.n~ --I : , __I--"j , , '" '" , n:--;'Z_n~ BYRAM DR . ~--- 2075 ---______1--....., 1_' , , , I I . . I _____________..__, 1._, .--'''' -_ _...... _____ .--1__ , ' ~ - -.. - ... - - - - - - -... ... - '- ... ~ . l...... __ :'-~' I, " . . t. ..I --, ~.Iw,,1 1!I!i* I .--' ,.., 4 : I ..p "I; - I ~ ~ ;: '; , , 1.._1 ,20&1 ~ -... I , '- ~ - : , ~b63:_ . , ~ _ _ r I-~-: : , , \-.... - - ~ 20~_u_ , , , Multi~(almny I I ~----- I fe~identia~ ~- -.! ,. --I , , , . : ' , , , :- - ~ u_ , , , . , ' , -. {--~;: [~~: I---~ 'n'lt' ~~. ",' R:~ '" ijl ~ ,---;:I; ~ --- ,~ ' L____. ~,~~ ~__ , " . , , , , , , , , , , , 1_ _I c ~~~~: ~I~~~ -(~ 00 .. '"'~ ","'/ ~ ..-... ~ ,---~, ;- : -...., 'I I : I :: 1__.-- I--~. ~ , " ' .-'20SJ 2~7:_ h.-. 'M -fa riil~ ~esmf ...ti: 1051 , , 1- _ _, "tJ~ 2!,"",,~, , , , , , , ill ):.; ~ 2~-~.: o ::-~ " , , l__1 \n2~f , , , '. -, ' 2~~__: , , , '------ , : ,-------..--------------, , , , , . l__' :u"~: i---j, :--,---, /'/~'lgI~~~a",J V ,--~ 1-- ~:!. -~~.. t ...... ~ ..,..~~, '\ ..:;it" .-"', --" ',.i1 " : '" ......11 .oS:. , I ,-- "~/,/""""" "'.. . a ;"--,1 ... "~. ~ ~-<l-?>~,~ 4 ::_~;:: ___I"'1I~--..._.. ~ ,,0.. y":,,\ II : : ,'..... ,. ~...... .. ,..\..... ;. - 1 - -, - - - - - ' , b \-', ' -- ~.,': ~ f>~ \ " ;, CJ969; Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004~3002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size(Acres) : Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR Atlas Page: 252A :- - 2-036: '"I ;-1 ~ : , "1l3a : I.! , , 2~---1 , , I ;: , , L.__. .. 1 2P24 2~j-:_ ..Sine e-f l~!~Y f~~( en1itf-'i :: :_- _: Q , ~- I-~_.! . ~-'--_: .. RIDGELANE RD " -' .... , -, , , , ---,~ '-, .~ """: : .._I 1 II : 1____- Sin ~le- ami Iv resi len ~al " 1 1Il ~.._ : ----~ .st-~ 1_.. " .. :- - ~~-, ~ - : , '" ~- - -- -., ~ ' 1_, : --I 1 L __I ~._------------~------- 1-----------1 , , , , , , , , , , , , '___________1 , ...----------- .' , " , , , . ~'\ ~ " , , . ',' ,- -, - - - ---p- - ----- --- ------, , . ,- - --- -. - - ----,- --- - -,__~ 2046 ,.--~ , . , , , , , ---~ - --- <: :s Q ::t ~ ~ ~ ~ . -- ,"" ; , . . . . . . . .. ,"" -- . -. )-----..------ l-----~-----. I II 1 :'M-ulti::'f~miIy- - --: :~'~.esidential --------------- , , , , , , , 1__ .J :_- - - - ~ - - --- - - - ~ 12043 .-- -- - -- - --- - - - - - --- - - - ---I , , , , 1- __~ --- - - - -- -- - - - _",- - - - --- Existing Surrounding Uses Map View looking northeast from southwest comer side of site View looking southeast from west side of site View looking east from west side of site View looking east from west side of site View looking east from west side of site View looking east from west side of site Baysbore Broadway, Inc. LUZ2004-03002 2025 North HigWand Avenue ... Monday, March 22, 2004 10:25 AM . p,01 nD [H~ ~ 0 IYl!E mi. ... UU MAR 2 2 2004 illJ g~ \l1tI~~MefFNJ i.\\~ 'U~ flRDEPT ATTN. Mark Parry Fax Number 562-4576 Phone Number WO>l# LUZZU;t[- o~f>>~ FROM Geoffrey C. Weber Fax Number 727-461-9133 Phone Number 727-449-1476 SUBJECT 2043/2045 Highland Avenue Number of Pages 2 Date 3/22/2004 MESSAGE Mark: Attached is the information you requested regarding the Highland Avenue Applications. This information was emailed to you and and Bryan Berry March 10,2004 at about 12.06 PM. I am sorry you did not receive this. In addition, Jane Caldera of Avid Engineering is performing a traffic study as per Traffic's specifications. Please call 449-1476 to confirm receipt or request additional information. ~ Monday, March 22, 2004 10:25 AM . p.02 . Alllllttonlll InforruaUon for JUJlit.lficat.loll nle Petition for Arlllex~tioll, Re'I"CO\ for ~ COJllprehell~ive Laud U<e A'lIe'1l<ltnel,1 lU"t" ZO"itI8 At1il~ Au1e'ldlllerlt: 1) nle Appli.otion i. .01l.i.teJlt wil.h the IlIlctor!yin8 80,,11 of Ihe COlllpreholl.ive ploll "lid will f"r1l,er I.he 11lll]lo~e oflh COU1'llonity Development Cade ;. ApI'l"o'VI'I.1 ~viJl "Uo,,~'foJ' iuvU,19v,lop1rJ.t1lt ~or'...;~t'nt y..ith ..1'9 urban renewal otrategie~ that predominate in implementing Cle~er'. COlllpreh",ive pi'll'. Ii. Thi~ type of intill will make available rea~onllbly priced hou~inll - which i, encour8&ed by the Plan. 2) 111e Application i~ cOlllpatible with the ~lIlrounding area j. NOlth IU1c1E..I,: The property ",ljo,""lto the uorth"lld we.' i. High DrIl~ity Residential and i, developed a~ a high den~ity rental complex con~ioting of!9 buildings with the M~ociated p;]lxitl8 01111 .010ll11l1lity lUlleoilie.. ii. F\u1hrJ' north i. cOlllmercial 3) 111e Application i~ not in contlict with the need~ Nld character Oftllll Il'i'i!J.lJ'tl'rIlQod i. The neighborhood wa~ developed mostly over 3D yeN'll ago ~o Ihe ouly oot"rol!.ype of ,le'VelopJlleJlt i. hi8" clell.it)> infill ii. The additional impact fees from development, combined with Ihe ol.reo'e,lt..." bo'e will heh, provicle ..I,litionol.ervke. 4) nle Appli.otion i. oot80i08to ..dveNb' affe<t Ihe .hor:t<ter of the neighborllood and the City i. New hOll,018 will ollprove Pie .h;]l1lL1er oflbe nei8Jlborbood by "11'lotiIl8Ihi. ie.non ofHi8M;md Avellue, iI. 111m m"lli.fillllily "OU'018 i. bem8 ,Ievelope,l in JJl:UIY ....OJ! of Clearw;>ler lU,,1 hell" to pl'Ovi,le reo'ollllhb' pI1..d home. for middle income f!llllilie, 5) nle Applkotion Willllot ",lv'l,eb' buroeo pllbli. f",jlilie., in.llIdin8 O'o1fIc..ilnyhI8 cilp",tUe. i. It i~ Nlticipated that Highland AVrIlue will not be adver~ely off..te,l by the pl'opo..d developme"t ,ble to Pie deminilllll" ~ize ofthe development. Per the city's reque8l, a trafiic study 1"i Leirlg t'ouductell Mil will ue: filed priDrto the DevelDpJfl~lt Review Committee meeting on April!, 2004. Ii. Btrvic.. for n.Mh, water and iewtl' are all available at the site '11,,1 it 9llpe:u' t1,~t .opacil.y i. ""fficierlt G) The Application will not advemly affect the natural fnvirolllllOllt i. The property is clIITently two ~in~le-f!llUily rental dwelling~ wilh ex-te'lIlecl '~ivewO~'lUllllDoiJll;l.ille,1 bohi"y""t., nte rOjlflty doe~ not appear to have any wttland or other e,,,,h'oIlrrlerlt:d ilro:~lJelro: II. SOlDe lI"e removal wlll be requU"d and lhe Appllcanl wlllmeel ill replacement required by City Code. 7) nle Appli.otion cloal'ly follow-the pottel1l of ,lenlop7110llt i"lellde,1 for infill parret. and the ~ubject ~ite CIIIl be adelj\lately serviced by the City. CL WCoverSheet . . L UZ2004-03002 2025 N HIGHLAND AVE Date Received: 03/02/2004 BAYSHORE BROADWAY~ INC. ZONING DISTRICT: MHDR LAND USE: RH ATLAS PAGE: 252A PLANNER OF RECORD: MTP \ Wednesday, December 29, 2004 2:47 pe l~/~~I~~~Q ~~:~5 727-4426272 '-'-"- -',- -... EQUITY PRO REA~TV e p.02 PAGE 02 " o 2!lM,tG 1~lIlll1lmU GEOFFREY WEBER 221 TURNER ST CLEARWATER. FL 33756 ,R.EStWCnvt COVENANT HIGJ[LA~.D.A VE~{Jt Pt\"''EL U,vmOP B~DW~ INC. KARLfEN F. DE BLAKE~, CLERIC OF COUltT PINEllAS COUNTY FLORIDA 1~9T/J 2004411418 12/01120048112:48 PM OFf ,,~C BK: 13B73 PO: 3&-39 DacTYPII:RST RECOROING: $31.110 THIS DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. COND!T10NS . AND REST1\TCTIONS (thi ",DecI8l'1UiQn") is made by Leonard Chetktn ami Mary Cbctldn (the "Oeolaranl") el.fe..tive 81 of the date set fonh below, and is joined in by Bayshore Broad9iay. Inc. eB-.ysbore Broadwayn) ae contract vendee for tho real property encumb8re~ hereby (tile ,.Pt'Openy")~ shall COIIIlUMC a COVllWlt running \'\lith the land binding on the heirs. succcssors and auigns of the Oeclatant and Btyshore Broadway, and shaH BUtmnatically ta'minate of recoord as hereinafter set mrth. WHBlU!AS, on October 19~ z004. the Boml of County CommissIoners siuing:as the Countywide PlaDoing Authority for PinoJ]p COUll!)', Florida, after public hearing duJy nOtlced and advertllled, arlnpr.ed IIlarld use pJannift8 dCliesniltign gCJ,H (I\e&i~nlhd High) for that cemin parcel ofrca.l property siruated in Pintllu Qmnty, F1orid~ whieh is More p8tl.icularly described on Exhibit "A" attac;:hsd hereto and InoorporatQd herejl) by reference (tbe "Property"). and WlfEREAS, tbe Deeluam, with th. Conc:tltTOnCCl ofBaYllhOIll Broadway, desirea to erIturnber the 'Property with certain OOveJlGmJ:;. co.nditiou and fllltricti"119 as mgfC particulllfJy hereiDaft\7 set fbnh, wbicl) miners shan became eil'eetive upon recordation oftllis instrument and the afJprovaJ of the RH future land use deslgrLltioll tbr the Property (the "Effective Date"). NOW, T.H:ER'EfORE. Oeclarant states &$ follows: 1. reference, The above recitals are true and correct and lire hu,mporated heRln I)y ~, COMmencing with the Effective Dat&; rhe Property shell be owned, he\d, developed, soid and lellsed or otherwise utilized only iD acc;ordance w;th the co~ants, conditions and reatrictions set folth in this Deellll'atioD, All subsequent pur~hasers from De~larant Qf Bayshore Broaowar, 8& owners ohll or any pOrtion of the Property, shall be. 5U~le(;t to and bound by the tennll afthi~ Declaration, J. Notwithstllldina lite quantity oflcreaae contained within the Property that is subject to the RH Jand use designation the total pCl'lJ)itted density on the Property ~hall not exceed 22 dwelli1'l8 units:per acre, 4. Plnellas County, Florida is hereby designated CXpl"eli~ intended b~~;iary of this Declaration. and shan have the right, LJpon.lay breach here~ and in add1tloo to all powers b~ld by it as the govemmmJw authorities haviLl8 jurisdiction over the Property, to ~l'Otl tbc termllo, conditioos, and roatrietiona sest forth herein. Declarant and aft)' lIUbllequent OWII~ hertby irrevoc:abJy waivcit any claim or defi:n~ that this Dflllll.r~tion ill not lcp!ly v41id and. binding upoo themselves and the Property. (^nU:lPOII,lX)CI Wednesday, December 29,20042:47_ 12604 13105 7~1-442b272 _ , p.OS l;:QUtTV PRO RE'AL TY P~GE ~3 i- .IN WITNESS WHIiREOF. tile ~\llmnt and Baysl;tgre Broadway havlS sd their hands and ssats on the day lmd year set forth beloW; however, this Declaration ~hall be recorded and shall. become effective only upon the: ~ICCUrTencc of the Bf"&ctive 'DilIotc, .5 ~ fonl\ above. - ~~ G4r/.. Mary Chd In BAYSHOREBR.!!~~ / ~ .......~ --------~ ~~ llY'1tll: -, ,-~~ ,'r;::.. ST ATE OF FLckmA . - COUN'!Y.OF ~ . \( \Th~ foregoi.ng 'Restric:tive Covenant wu acknowll:ldged before me the: --5- day of ~~Q ".~ 2.004, by Leonarcl C etkin,. WilD i~msDna.11x IatQWT1 to me tlT hlL'l produced as identifi ti.on and wfio llillil taken an r.^,"'~'U/)A,~.l \,0 a- Notaty Public.. State oU'lorida ~l- My COrPIQ\"iQn l:i~pUu: :z ) Wednesday, December 29, 20042:47 pre l/B5/2BB4 la:0S 727-4426272 P~GE e4 EQUITV PRO ~~~LTV e p,04 (0' Notary Public. Swc ot'Florida My CommipiQn ~lre9: STATEOFFLm COUN1'Y OF" b("~~ \ The forcsoinIJ lUMCll\f8 Cq)(,,",nt WI" w;k of _~ n~alA.l~JI , 2004~ by ~ of Bayabore BrDlldway, who is persoaa y known as' ~'1~1J,1'''", Mnd!\ Burr !~W'" .~\ OOlIlD1IS&~Ol1ll CC 98386~ :e.~ . )..: EX'i1rel; J3II. 11,2005 . 'II;, W~ ~ Do~~.~1 'l'llJ1\ 'I,f/llfl\' AlLulUe :B~odi~ll Co., JJ\d, d before m~e 18 . day ..as ~ me ot bas produced o bas tlllmlln oath. ...... ---- 1 M22uol.'DOCI 3 ,: :{ " . r :\ 'I I 1 i It e STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor THADDEUS L. COHEN, AlA . Secretary - -'------ August 20,2004 -,/,-,"" .. '" '., c' ~ ~ i~.j r i ';" ~,"....;~..\il .;.'('! .' The Honorable Brian Aungst Mayor, City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 AUG 24 "1.004 Dear Mayor Aungst: The Department has conducted a preliminary review of the City of Clearwater proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment received on July 16,2004, (DCA No. 04-2). The Department has determined that the proposed plan amendment need not be formally reviewed for consistency with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). In addition, the Department has not received any recommendation for review from the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, but has received a comment from Mr. William COI'l;nelly whoobjected to the redesignation the 36 acre parcel from Residential Urban to Open Space I Recreation. With this letter, the Department waives its Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The City may proceedto immediately adopt the amendment; however, we recommend that you consider Mr. Connelly's views during your decision making process. For your assistance, we have attached procedures for final adoption and transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment. This letter should be made available for public inspection. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mark Neuse, Planner, or Marina Pennington, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 922-1798. .;:IS, M ~CI~ lCA Charles Gauthier, AICP -g Chief of Comprehensive Planning CG/mn cc: Ms. Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Mr Manny Pumariega, TBRPC Enclosures: Review Agency Comments Letter from Mr. William Connelly 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD $ TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: htto:/Iwww.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 Marathon, FL 33050-2227 (305) 289.2402 COMMUNITY PLANNING 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 488-2356 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 413-9969 HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 488-7956 e e Transmittal Procedures Upon receipt ofthis letter, the City of Clearwater shall have sixty (60) days within which to adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-l 1.011, Florida Administrative Code. The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163.3 1 89(2)(a), F.S. Within ten (10) working days of the date of adoption, the City of Clearwater must submit the following to the Department: 1. Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; 2. A copy ofthe adoption ordinance; 3. A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; 4. A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and, 5. A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendment, and pursuant to Rule 9J-11.0ll(f) F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to Mr. Manny Pumareiga, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that the Florida legislature amended Section l63.3184(8)(b), F.S., requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice ofIntent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish to the Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information~ This list is to be submitted at the time of transmittal ofthe adopted plan. amendment Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event no names/addresses are provided, please provide that information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format -.'."..'...'.........""..'......'."..' ^..'._.-.,'.___'....'__'..___.. ._..._._.__,'...".M.'..'...,'...",'.',','..m....- ._....._.__,'.._........-,.-.._., '.,_._.,."".-_....-.,.,.'.',...'".'.','.-",'d. '~;R';''''.',~,I~Q'!''J!!'ff!l'i.''c!;~;!!,,'E!,C!,!i;~i;''Ri!~ T..xmpa &.n.' :Ji:.~gk",..z11'1ann~n(/ C"ul1cll e e Agenda Item #3.H.l 08/09/04 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AMENDMENT REPORT q Mf '1t{~l()Lf CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#04-2 PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3184(6)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, IT IS REQUESTED THAT DCA NOT REVIEW THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e (This page intentionally left blank) For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 e Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e e AMENDMENT #LUZ2004-03002 - Future Land Use Map . From: To: Pinellas County Residential Low (RL) Residential High .(RH) . . Size: 4.4 acres Location: 2025 North Highland Avenue · Existing Use: Two single-family dwellings · Proposed Use: 132 townhouse dwellings · Adjacent Designations: North: RH · South: Residential Urban (RU) East: RH · West: RU · Adjacent Uses: · North: Multi-familyresidential · South: Single-family residential · East: Multi-family residential · West: Single-family residential · Regionally Significant: No, based on the fact the proposed amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resources or facilities. · Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No, based on the fact that the proposed amendment does not raise any extra-jurisdictional issues. · Impact regional facilities/resources?: No, based on the fact the proposed amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resources or facilities. · Regional Comments: None. · Applicable SRPP Policies: None. · Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 1 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 051 .'.,tS ~ . . , , I;-R, '-39 I - r.:rJ- - : - -, , J 1_.... __ J":I'J--, . ,. . =..::.=...:'" oM -, , ,- - . , -' , , ,- ..-' lJ17--,,; -. , , , '__ _I ,-----j, , , .~. .. ~- .. -' ,> C?D ..... ;j "1- , _"'r -.1 , .. _' _~ " , I :_........! -. , _.. j- -"-; , , 1",. N I .. --0:.;) C) , ........"::"---- -I - YRAM DR - ---.., , - -. ,.- -' " I.. -r."ih;~? ...-.. .-- f ,- . I r:. , J '---2.o.!6 .---, , , , '--. :__~ _ ~O.{O :,~- - -.." , . ,- --j , , , , I "_j ;__ __:030 .-----, 1__ " : 2~24 ".... I , pI I, . , :_.;zP18 , ., ,'"'''' .. --I '0 ' ~:il---.J .. .. ~- ... ~ , , , . --.. -' ';J. ~ -"i ,___I , 2a~::; e . , , , , , , , , , .1...---__1 , : , , , , ., . , . . ~ --' , , , '........ j---_..._------~--._----I , , ~-----_.~------..---___l ;- -___H__ RH -- -_.h '. , I .' I , J . "'-----.....____ 1........__----- ,"- -. ------. -- --- -- -_._",,- ----: . -.. ----... - --- -.._---- -,--~ ~--~ I ' , ' :_ __1 , , , , . 1_ __._' <: ~ G) ::r:: r-- h ~ h ~ ,----....------ . , , , '-........ -- - "... ..-' ,. ........ .................. ~ I . L._______..______ ,- -. :-- l,;"': I C"J '_.. c-~ L.. :-. Future Land Use MaD For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 2 , , I , , , ~ ... .~ J "" ,- --",1i . .. L _.. _.2 . . " , , I , , , , 1__ . ,--, 1- ;._,~j :- : ,. " :_-'--" Jgt;g, ~. I~ -, I , -.L. ~E~~ Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext 28 It e ."..V Florida Department of Transportation .'ER BliSH GO\"ER,\'OR 11201 N. McKinley Drive' Tampa, FL 33612.6~56 . Phone (813) 975-6000 . 1-800-226,7220 July 23, 2004 r/i)'1I &Il 0 W ~rn~ ~[:: ~ s 2004 /tj I . '. i I r . . RPM ~SP --,,~-J I' , ,:; '" ' ,b. ~,..:d~ PI'rOCfSSiNfi n',' \ I -_....---.::.:~-..:_~<~~~~....'"'.'""--1 i fJ\ ? 1 ~? (j' ( GV( Mr. Charles Gauthier, AICP Chief, Bureau of Comprehensive Planning Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: City of Clearwa.ter Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 04-2 Dear Mr. Gauthier: The Department has reviewed the proposed Clearwater comprehensive plan Amendment 04-2 in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the Department's Review Guidelines for Local Government Comprehensive Plans. We do not object to any of the proposed changes (including LUZ2004-03002; LUZ2004-03003; and LUZ2004-04001) and we do not anticipate that they will adversely impact the Florida Intrastate Highway System and/or the Florida Transportation System. Should the application vary upon a future re-submittal, we would request the opportunity to review it. The Department appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed Amendment. If you have any questions, please call me at SunCom 512-780 C or (813) 975-6444. Sincerely, ~tU.~ Carol M. Collins LGCP and CMS Coordinator cc: Bob Romig, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT Cynthia Tarapani, AICP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater www.dot.state.fl.us .IOSt ARREtI SECRETARY @ ~;::rvrl en D_'DCtJ "- -------. e e Department of Environmental Protection ........__-..J. " .... '-'... '=' Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399~3000 Jeb Bush Governor August 9, 2004 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and DR! Processing Team Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 1\ \()lll~ RE: Clearwater 04-2, Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Office of Intergovernmental Programs has reviewed the proposed amendment under the procedures of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 9J-5 and 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code, and we do not have any comments based on the information provided. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If I may be of further assistance, please call me at (850) 245-2169. Sincerely, SPlD Sarah E.Daugherty Environmental Specialist Office of Intergovernmental Programs /sed "More Protection, Less Process" An Equal Opportunity Employer Watson L. Haynes II Chair, Pinellas Heidi B. McCree Vice Chair, Hillsborough Judith C. Whitehead Secretary, Hernando Talmadge G. "Jerry" Rice Treasurer, Pasco Edward W. Chance Man atee Thomas G. Dabney Sarasota Maggie N. Dominguez Hillsborough Ronnie E. Duncan Pine lias Ronald C. Johnson Polk Janet D. Kovach Hillsborough Patsy C. Symons DeSoto David L. Moore Executive Director Gene A. Heath Assistant Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel e Southwest Florida Water Management District Bartow Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Lecanto Service Office 3600 West Sovereign Path Suite 226 Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 667-3271 August 4, 2004 D. Ray Eubanks Bureau of State Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Subject: e 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TOO only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM. 531-6900 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 ~ f'^~ <L\~H .---.:';'"", . 20rl' ~ '.J'.,.;' .' }~...__< t .J . J-- .....-;,.._~'" Clearwater Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment DCA Reference # 04-2 Dear Mr. Eubanks: In accordance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. the staff of the Southwest Florida Water Management District has reviewed the above- referenced plan amendment and has no comments at this time. The District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review of comprehensive plan amendments. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me in the District's Planning Department at extension 4423. tit ~ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Glenda E. Hood Secretary of State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 t flP ~I&(O'I !.Irl.l~~~"k [IT'~ - n ~7 'R" r'). ,I" r -'_ U i!J L5 .". "r. . i --li/'j I Pili . J' d , (. ,; tf4l8','~' , II' I j'--',.;.. ~. C'lnnA 'I' J I . ~"i; - (1 ~ I~.~) !~.-.r"=~...~. " - . ppliiiFp------' ! ....7)1 "') ."..:, .) ..~oo=..;=~,~~,J:,!1~9,[~'?n9Jld!l July 28, 2004 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Clearwater (04-2) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request Dear Mr. Eubanks: According to this agency's responsibilities under sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document to determine if data regarding historic resources have been given sufficient consideration in the request to amend the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. We reviewed two proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map, in addition to a text amendment, to consider the potential effects of these actions on historic resources. While our cursory review suggests that the proposed changes may have no adverse effects on historic resources, it is the city's responsibility to ensure that the proposed revisions will not have an adverse effect on significant archaeological or historic resources in the City of Clearwater. For the Kapok Wetland Restoration Plan Amendment, LUZ2004-03003, there are three recorded archaeological sites adjacent to this parcel; thereby making this location a high probability area for encountering additional archaeological resources. The most effective way to guarantee that such sites are not adversely affected is for the city to sponsor or require historic resource surveys so that it can ensure its archaeological resources and historic structures more than 50 years old will be considered when substantive changes in land use are proposed. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp of the .. Division's Compliance Review staff at (850) 245...6333. Sincerely, ~ c!. m....~ ~/J~~ 1<< Frederick Gaske, Director 500 S. Bronough Street . Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 · http://www.flheritage.com o Director's Office (850) 245-6300 . FAX: 245-6435 o Archaeological Research (850) 245-6444 . FAX: 245-6436 o Historic Preservation (850) 245-6333 . FAX: 245-6437 o Historical Museums (850) 245-6400 . FAX: 245-6433 o Palm Beach Regional Office (561) 279-1475 . FAX: 279-1476 o St. Augustine Regional Office 0 Tampa Regional Office (904) 825-5045' FAX: 825-5044 (813) 272-3843 . FAX: 272.2340 . . SUSAN LATVALA CHAIRMAN October 19,2004 At its October 19, 2004 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners, acting as the CPA, took action to approve Case #CW 04-35. This action was subject to the filing of a restrictive covenant with Pinellas County that restricts the permitted density on the subject property to a maximum of22 dwelling units per acre. The Ordinance associated with this action is attached. Sincerely, ~cfc?fv~ .-.-., r-='"- \ SUSAN LATVALA Chairman Pinellas County Commission ;.5> -;..... i_ ~_ C\ h N\.)'~ \J ,) Attachment cc: Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director CPA\Corresp.ck.pg 4 "PINELLAS COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" ~, ....... PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON CASE NUMBER CW 04-35 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, a proposed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, which is an element of the Countywide Comprehensive Plan of Pinellas County, Florida, has been presented at a public hearing to the Board of County Commissioners in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority; and WHEREAS, notices and advertisements of public hearings have been accomplished as required by Chapter 73-594, Laws of Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, proce~ures of the Special Act and County Charter have been followed concerning the Pinellas Planning Council and the Countywide Planning Authority for proposed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater initiated a proposed amendment which was considered at a public hearing by the Pinellas Planning Council on July 21, 2004, with recommendation made by the Council that is documented in the Council report referred to as Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted a public hearing and taken action that is documented by ordinance for approvals or partial approvals and partial denials and by resolution for denials, with both documents including the relevant Council reports as attached. . e ATTACHMENT A #CW 04-35 , . I /' . e "'\ PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM \... .oiII I AGENDA ITEM: IVB-9. I I MEETING DAl'E: July 21,2004 I SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map From:. Residential Low - RL To: Residential High - RH Area: 4.4 acres CASE #: CW 04-35 JURISDICTION: City of Clearwater (LUZ 2004-03002) LOCATION: On the east side of North HigWand Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. TYPE: Regular Map Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based On Accompanying Findings (I. A. & B. [ 1-6]), Recommend That the Proposed Amendment to Residential High be Denied. and in the Alternative that the Residential Medium Category be Approved. Subiect to the City. Limiting Traffic Impacts Pursuant to the City's Concurrency Management System. /. FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following findings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. B. A. summarized evaluation of the impact of the amendment on the SlX Relevant Countywide Considerations is as follows: PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council recommended denial without preiudice of the change from Residential Low to Residential High. (Vote 9-2; City of Clearwater and Group C representatives dissenting) I COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: I 1 F:\USERS\WPDOCS'l..U\CASES\04 cases'July\Repons\CW04-35r.c1w.doc . . SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater I) Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules - The proposed amendment area is not consistent with the locational characteristics of the Residential High category, as enumerated in the Countywide Rules. Also, the proposal is not compatible with the surrounding residential uses or the majority of the future land use designations. However, the Residential Medium category is Gonsidered consistent with the locational characteristics in the Countywide Rules as well as the surrounding residential uses and future land use designations. 2) Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard - The amendment area is located on. Highland A venue, which is designated as an . arterial roadway and is . operating at. LOS "F" from Sunset Point Road to Union Street. Staff'.straffic estimates indicate that the proposed amendment would further degrade the. existing. conditions and the potential Year 2025 traffic volume on Highland Avenue. The alternative Residential Medium designation would lessen the impact expected. 3) Scenic/Non-Commercial Corridors (SNCC) - The amendment area is not located within a SNCC, so these policies are not applicable. 4), ~!.ICoastal Hi~h Hazard Areas (CRRA) - The amendment area i~. not located within . a CHHA, so these policies are not applicable. 5). Desi~nated Development/Redevelopment Areas - The amendment area is not in a Central Business District, Community Redevelopment District or Activity Center, so these policies are not applicable. 6) Adjacent To or Impactin~ An Adjoinin~ Jurisdiction or Public Educational Facility - The amendment area is being annexed by Clearwater and does not adjoin or impact another jurisdiction, nor is it adjacent to a public educational facility. However, the proposed amendment increases the number of dwelling units in this area, thereby potentially increasing the number of students to be served by the public school system.~ This increase can be accommodated through the School District's Choice System of student assignment. In consideration of and based upon these findings, it is recommended that the Droposed amendment of the Countywide Plan Map to Residential High be denied. and in the alternative the Residential Medium category be approved. subiect to the City limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the.City's Concurrencv Management Svstem. 2 , . SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater IL BACKGROUND Tbis regular amendment to the Countywide Plan Map has been submitted by Clearwater to the Council for review in accordance with Division 5.5 of the Countywide Rules. Parcel ID#: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 Existinl: Use: Two single-family homes Proposed Use: 132 Multi-family residential units Analysis: The proposed amendment from Residential Low to Residential High would allow the site to be developed with homes at a density of up to 30 dwelling units per acre. The 4.4-acre site, located on the east side of Highland Avenue in Clearwater, is proposed for development with 132 town homes. . Due to the size of the amendment area and the Countywide Plan category proposed by the City, the amendment is considered a regular amendment and has been reviewed according to three Relevant Countywide Considerations: Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules, Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard, and Adjacency To or Impact Upon An Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Educational Facility, as set forth below: Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules: Two single-family homes occupy the wooded amendment area. Apartments owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority occupy the abutting property to. the north and east, designated Residential High, 30 units per acre. To the south and west are single-family residential neighborhoods, designated Residential Urban, 7.5 units per acre. The existing FLUP category of Residential Low could be considered generally consistent with the site and the surrounding single- family area with the exception of its location on a more intensive/higher traffic arterial roadway, as opposed to a collector roadway, and with the other exception of its adjacency with the higher density residential apartment complex on the north and west. These two factors, the arterial roadway and the apartment complex, suggest that additional density could be considered for the site. The purpose of the proposed Residential High category as enumerated in the Countywide Rules is: .....to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as 3 SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. ." . As enumerated by the locational characteristics in the Countywide-Rules, Residential High is: "...generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are high density residential in nature; and in areas serving as an urban center. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network and are served by mass transit in a manner that provides an alternative to individual automobile use. " The amendment area is not in close proximity to an urban activity ~enter or other areas that are high density residential in nature. The highest density use adjacent to the amendment area is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority to the north and east and is built at approximately 20 units per acre, with a FLUP designation of Residential High - with 30 units per acre permitted. Further removed to the north is a 96-unit complex built at 24 units per acre. South and west of the subject area there is an average of 4.3 units per acre, consisting of single-family homes. The homes immediately south of the amendment area are built at less than 3 units per acre. The uses in the vicinity of the proposed amendment, including the uses fronting Highland A venue, are predominantly single-family and built at less than 5 units per acre, with a FLUP designation of Residential Urban, or 7.5 units per acre. None of the areas mentioned are likely to redevelop at the allowable density in the foreseeable future. The site does not contain wetlands or other pristine natural areas, but it does include a number of large trees that would be under pressure to be removed or compromised by a town home development built at 30 units per acre. The site does have direct access to Highland Avenue, which is classified as a two-lane undivided arterial roadway and is served each hour by the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. In summary, the site is not appropriate to be developed "in a highly intensive residential manner", nor is the proposed amendment to Residential High "consistent with the qualities and natural resource characteristics of the surrounding area." Therefore, the proposal is not consistent with the Countywide Plan and Rilles. In the alternative, the Residential Medium category allows residential development at a density of up to.15 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of the Residential Medium category as enumerated in the Countywide Rules is: - "...to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a moderately intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. " 4 '. '. SUBJECT." Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater As enumerated by the locational characteristics in the Countywide Rules, Residential Medium is: H...generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are medium density residential in nature; and in areas serving as a transition between less urban and more urban residential and mixed use areas. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network. " The amendment area is not within or in close proximity to an urban activity center, but is in an area with average development characteristics that more closely resemble medium density. Additionally, building at 15 units per acre, half of what is proposed, will have a lower impact on Highland Avenue, and should allow the development to be constructed in a manner that preserves the majority of the existing tree canopy. Lastly, the Residential Medium category serves as a transition from the 20 unit per acre apartments on the north and east, to the single.. family areas on the south and west. This category can also be considered more compatible with the surrounding single-family residential areas than the proposed density of 30 units per acre. Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard: A summary of the Transportation Impact Analysis is included as Attachment 1. The amendment - area is located on Highland Avenue, a two lane undivided arterial. Using the methodology adopted as part of the Traffic Characteristics Study conducted for the PPC by Tindale-Oliver, Inc., this roadway is operating at LOS "F" between Sunset Point Road and Union Street. The proposed Residential High category has a general trip generation rate of 183 vehicles per day per acre (vtpd), higher than the 51 vtpd expected to be generated by Residential Low uses. A 4.4- acre project developed with Residential High uses is anticipated to generate 805 trips, 581 more vtpd than the same site developed with Residential Low uses. As stated above, the existing and future (year 2025) LOS is "F" for Highland Avenue. The amendment to Residential High would worsen this condition as shown in the volume to capacity (vie) table found in Attachment 1 (a number lower than one indicates capacity remaining on the roadway and higher than one indicates the volume above the estimated roadway capacity). The existing vie ratio is 1.17 and would increase to 1.21.' The year 2025 conditions are projected at a 1.22 vie ratio without the amendment and 1.24 with amendment to Residential High. In summary, the proposed Residential High category's vtpd is considerably higher than the existing Residential Low category. The proposed amendment would therefore increase the existing and potential future traffic volumes on HigWand A venue, which is already operating at LOS "F." 5 .. . SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater In the alternative, a change to Residential Medium would lessen the expected impacts. This category is expected to generate 422 vtpd for the amendment site, 383 less than the proposed Residential High (118 more than the existing Residential Low). The LOS would remain "F" with Residential Medium, but the vlc ratios would not increase as much, with the existing again at a 1.17 vlc ratio increasing to 1.19 with amendment to Residential Medium. The year 2025 projections would be a 1.22 vlc ratio (without the amendment) and 1.23, respectively, with Residential Medium. A supplemental recommendation has been added to this report to address the increase in. traffic expected on Highland Avenue. The City's concurrency management standards allow an increase of up to 1 % without mitigation, and mitigation is required above that percentage point. Adiacent to or Impacting Another Jurisdiction or a Public Educational Facility: The amendment area is not adjacent to another jurisdiction, but may impact the public school system since it involves residential uses that will likely include school age children. The amendment to Residential High would allow development of up to 132 dwelling units. Using the Pinellas County School District's standard ratio of 0.3 students per household, development of the site could bring an additional 40 students to this area. According to the representatives of the School District, these students will be accommodated through the Choice Plan. Additionally, while the amendment area is approximately 14 mile from the Dunedin Highland Middle School, no traffic circulation issues or problems are expected to be created by the development, nor is there any issue with respect to compatibility with the school. Local Government Transmittal: On June 17, 2004, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, acting as the applicant local government, gave initial approval to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan, and authorized an application for amendment of the Countywide Plan Map. In summary, the proposed amendment to Residential High is inconsistent with the CountyWide Plan and Rules and the subject area is not an appropriate location in which to apply this Countywide Plan category. In consideration of and based upon these findings, it is recommended that the proposed amendment of the CountyWide Plan Map to Residential High be denied. and in the alternative the Residential Medium category be approved. subiect to the City limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the City's Concurrencv Management Svstem. Planners Advisory Committee (PAC): At its meeting on July 12, 2004, the PAC recommended approval of the staff recommendation (Vote 9-1; Clearwater dissenting). The minutes from the PAC's discussion of this case are provided at the back of this report as Attachment 4. 6 SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater IlL LIST OF MAPS & ATTACHMENTS Map 1 Map 2 Map 3 Map 4 Attachment I Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Attachment 4 Location. Countywide Plan Category & Jurisdictional Map - Black & White Aerial- Black & White Countywide Plan Category - Color Calculation of Traffic Impacts PPC Disclosure of Interest Form Local Government Transmittal Package Draft PAC Minutes 7 !~ :::> <= it> ;; ::> <= '. ~ '... :~ MAP 1 CASE NO. CW04-35 ~ ~ PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL GRAPHICS PREPARED BY THE OFFICE OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, JIM SMITH Produced by MEDIT V2.1, Copyright 1991,1992 Pinellas County, Florida Property Appraiser. All Rights Reserved. 194 ~I)=~ o a: o < o a: bI Z ii: ...J <( .!,",i-." . d -,;" .'. ._J':.i:.o..~ .-..- ~ ~.-- J;..- ~I'-- ~ ~-"-- <( <( a: < m a: < m LEGEND RESIIlENTIAL RESlDEl>l'I:Ill BURU. JlESIDENTIAL ESTATE BESIDEN'I:W. SUBUllBAN RESIDENTIAL LOW D.. . RESIDENTIAL . llRBAN lHION STREET " I I //~ ~~ I-- ~ - ~ ~:= a:=- a: _ RIDGEl.:N!: I--- I--- r-- tl. I--- 1--- ~ I-- Inn- < j~~iN!: = :):== - tlR - <I-- bI -!C ...J _0. ~ ~ '- , . '.. ~IOGELANE V.!'" A;" ~. ~. 'V ,,"-. 'V.. ROAD ~iJ... ~. < . , , . : , , DRIVE ~g~8 I ~ i bI _. ~ 1'--1-- I 1--1-- ~ \ :Sl--I-- ~- -~=~~ MIXED USE RESIDD''I'IAL L01I" KEDIUJ( RESIDENTIAL J(EDIU)( RESIDENTIAL IDGB RESIDENTIAL ...:1 JlESORT VERY HIGH .... FACn.rrIES . .. OVERLA.Y _RESORT FACILlTIES MEJ)IUJ( ....~ mGH FROM: TO: RL RESIDENTiAL LO"W WATER/DRAINAGE FActuTY OVERLAY RH RESIDENTIAL IDGH WATER/DIWN.AGE FAC= OVERLAY ACREAGE: 4.4 [!!!J a= ~ - ~-L -=- ~ W - --- fo- != Z :z JbI ~ uu> . -~ tttttr1 - 4" HERON _111111 !_"11 II: ~ -1 OSPREY .~-1I11 II ~-.II I Iii ../ 181S UNION - STREET ~ '-;";';":"';'.:;:, -. ~-,' a: 0"":"- {:} ::'; - -'-- - - -......... - - - I-- a...BERLArc- LANE a: o 'il ~ a: bI ~ 0. '-- HUNTINGTON LANE ./ ..... J.A AI..... .....1....1. A -, r r VJ..../..;.. . 11 A . AlA .;J..... j., I....J A /K\ rl .. A-I 77 . A IU~~ ~~ =~ L I :..\ ~15 1------l1..:~ l \ ~1 _ lce1 J , rn~/?~ IT,~= SOUVENIR ~IVE t-- JL-- ,~~ /(f\~ I I - / I CIRCLE PICARDY COKMERew. PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC SPEClAUmSIGNATlON ~~El\~ ~,. WATER/ . . DJl.\INAGE . FEATlJRE ~ SCENlcl NON-cOlIIIERCAL CORRIDOR ~ AC:l'IVlTY CElo."l'ER/ PRnWlY SECONDARY CO>BlERCUL NEIGHBORHOOD PBESERV.A'I'ION =T.. CO>BlERClAL = ~JlW JlESlDENTlAL/ OFFlCE/RETAIL COlOlERClAL RECREATION INS'J'ITOTIONAL CO>BlERCIAL GENERAL TlWiSPORTA'l'JON"j ll'I'ILlTY COllOroNll'Y REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL CENTR.I.L BUsnasS DISTRICT INDlJSTIlUI. = 1 [ INDUSTRIAL GENERAL ( MAP 4 CASE NO. CW04-35 J ,~. ) PINEIJ.AS PLANNING COUNCIL GRA..."'BlCS PR!PJ.P.!D BY TBI ornCI: OF I'KE !'INEl.US COlJl!'IY PROPl!RTr ~ mr SKITI! GRAPHICS PREP.ARKD USING liEDlI 'VERSlOri 2.J C · CW 04-35 - Clearwattt -ATTACHMENT 1 Table 1 Trip Generation Comparison . de Plan Cate 0 vs. Pro osed Conn ide Plan Cate 0 Plan Category Size in Acres Traffic Std. Total Trip (vtpd/ac) Generation d 404 51 224 Proposed Plan Category RH 404 183 805 Alternative Amendment Proposed By PPC Staff RM 404 96 422 Table 2 V olnme and Level of Service Comparison Amendment to RH Existing Condition Roadway Link W lout Amendment With Amendment # Current LOS VIC Volume LOS V/C Volume Union S1. (From Keene 2190 6,451 C 040 6,676 C Al Rd. to Patricia Ave.) Highland Ave. (From 3750 15,200 F 1.17 15,651 1.21 F Sunset Point Rd. to Union S1.) Future Condition Roadway Link W lout Amendment With Amendment # 2025 LOS V/C Volume LOS VIC LRTP Volume Union S1. (From Keene 2190 6,709 C .39 6,872 C .39 Rd. to Patricia Ave.) Highland Ave. (From 3750 16,726 F 1.22 17,051 F 1.24 Sunset Point Rd. to Union St.) Attachment 1 - Page 1 of3 . CW 04-35 - Clearwater . ATTACHMENT 1 Table 3 Volume and Level of Service Comparison Alternative Amendment to RM Existinl! Condition Roadway Link W/out Amendment With Amendment # Current LOS V/C Volume LOS VIC Volume Union St. (From Keene 2190 6,451 C .40 6,569 C .41 Rd. to Patricia Ave.) HigWand Ave. (From 3750 15,200 F 1.17 15,436 F 1.19 Sunset Point Rd. to Union St.) Future Condition Roadway Link W/out Amendment With Amendment # 2025 LOS V/C Volume LOS VIC LRTP Volume Union St. (From Keene 2190 6,709 C .39 6,764 C .39 Rd. to Patricia Ave.) Highland Ave. (From 3750 16,726 F 1.22 16,837 F 1.23 Sunset Point Rd. to Union St.) Table 4 MPO 2025 Cost Feasible PlanlTrans ortation 1m Roadway Existing MPO 2025 Classification Classification Union St. Two-lane Two-lane undivided local undivided local arterial arterial Highland Ave. Two-lane Two-lane undivided local undivided local arterial arterial rovement Pro ram TIP Scheduled 1m rovements None None Attachment 1 - Page 2 of 3 . , . CW 04-35 - Clearwater . ATTACHMENT 1 Notes Re: Traffic Tables: 1. Traffic volumes are expressed in vehicle trips per day (vtpd) 2. Traffic standards are the trip generation rate standards in the Rules. 3. Traffic estimated for undeveloped parcels is added to the existing condition analysis. 4. Traffic estimated for developed land is accounted for in the :MFO adopted traffic count (2003 Annual Level of Service Report). 5. Traffic estimated for future conditions based on Future Land Use Plan category is accounted for in the :MFO adopted future volumes as reported in the 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). 6. Level of service and volume-to-capacity ratios (V/C) for both existing and future conditions is based on the FDOT table, "Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas." 7. Cumulative impacts based on FLUP amendments approved after January 1, 2001. 8. Levels of Service (LOS) are defined as follows: "A" A free flow condition. "B" A stable flow condition. "c" A relatively satisfactory traffic condition with good operating speeds. "D" An unstable traffic flow condition with only tolerable operating speeds. "E" An unstable traffic flow condition with momentary stoppages from congestion. "F" A forced-flow condition in which the facility acts as storage for vehicles backing up from a downstream bottleneck. Attachment 1 - Page 3 of 3 I.,...... / ;". ..i... . . . . Mr. David P. Healey July 21, 2004 Page 2 of3 . Asidentified in the May 3,2004 report, North Highland Avenue is.under construction to the riorth of Union Street. This construction condition is temporary and would be expected to result in a temporary reduction in the travel' demand.' . ..Based on follow up discussions with the engineer who authored the petitioner's report, we understand that North Keene Road was recently reconstructed as a 4 lane roadway. The petitioner's engiIieer identified the additional capacity provided on Keene Road may be the result of the reduction of traffic on North Highland Avenue. We note that no statement was provided in the petitioner's report to this effect."jVe further note that the applicant did not. cOJ?duct daily traffic counts on either Keene Road or Highland Avenue to substimtiate that the improvements on Keene Road has resulted in either a temporary or long term reduction in travel demand on Highland Avenue . We areconcernedthatthe P.M. Turning Movement Count conducted between 4:00 pm and 6:00pm may not adequately represent the peak hour conditions on Highland Avenue. We base this concern on the fact that the initial 15 minute period resulted in a total volume of 526 vehicles. This was the highest 15 miimte count and may be indication that the peak hour occurs prior to 4:00 pm. The applicants use of the 4:00 pm to 6:00pm time period to develop 1i!e AADT maybe understating the actual daily conditions. Again, recent daily machine traffi~ counts would resolve this concern on way or another. We conducted ail ArtPlan level of serviCe analysis' using the applicants turning movement data and other default level of service data. This analysis followed the PPC Land Use Plan Amendment methodology. The results of this analysis are summarized below: No Amendment D D With Amendment. D D Based on the information available, we find that the Pinellas Planning Council staff transportation analysis report was properly performed. The use of more detailed data provided in the petitioners report in our revised analysis results in improved level of service conditions. The ArtPlan'level of service we performed indicates that the existing conditions with no amendment and with the amendment are level of service D and D, respectively. when projected 2025 conditions are reviewed using the ArtPlan type of analysis, the resulting level of service without and with the amendment are level of service w . . Mr. David P. Healey July 21, 2004 Page 3013 D and D, respectively. This indicates that the effect of approval of the amendment is should be allowed from a transportation perspective. Should you have any q:uestions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact William Roll at (813) 224-8862 or myself at (407) 896-9200. Sincerely, Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1PMi~ Robert P. Wallace, P.E., AICP Vice-President RPW/wer cc: Theresa H. Goodman, AICP; Pinellas Planning Council WilliamE. Roll, Jr.,AICP; Tindale Oliver & Associates, Inc. . . . ATTACHMENT 2 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST STATEMENT PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL CASE NUMBER * SUBMITTING GO'VER.l\TJ.\1ENT El\TJ'ITY: CITY OF CLEARWATER PPC OR CITyrrO"'N CASE NUMBER: LUZ2004-03002 PROPERTY O"'NERS: BA YSHORE BROADWAY, INC. REPRESENTATIVE: :MR. ALEX PANIK P ANlK. ENGINEERING, INC. 39326 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH TARPON SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34689 ANY OTHER PERSONS HA VlNG ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: Interests: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin & Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Contingent: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Upon Annexation, Land Use Amendment, & Rezoning of Property. Absolute: Name: Specific Interest Held: INDICATION AS TO WHETHER A CONTRACT EXISTS FOR SALE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, IF SO: Yes _Contract is: Same as Above Contingent: Same as Above Absolute: All Parties To Contract: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin & Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Name: INDICATION AS TO WHETHER THERE ARE ANY OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SUBJECT PROPERTY, IF SO: No All Parties To Option: Name: Name: ANY OTHER PER TINE1\T'f INFORM.A.. TION WHICH A.PPLICANT MAY VlISH TO SUBMIT PERTAINING TO REQUESTED PLAN AMENDMENT: * NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY PLANNING COUNCIL STAFF S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BiLand Use AmendmentsiLUZ 2004iLUZ2004-03002 2043 N HighlaruiIPPC:LUZ2004-03002 PPC DISCLOSURE STA TEME^7. doc APPLICATION FOR ~E FUTURE LAND t4t PLAN AMENDMENT Please complete all the information below as accurately as possible to ensure that the application for the land use plan amendment can be processed efficiently. Processing of the application will not be started until this form has been completed. If additional space is needed, please number and attach additional sheets. 1. Countywide FLUP Map Amendment Information 1. Current Countywide FLUP Designation RL RH 2. Proposed Countywide FLUP Designation II. Local Plan Map Amendment Information 1. Local Plan Map Amendment Case Number 2. Current Local Plan Designation(s) 3. Current Local Zoning Designation(s) 4. Proposed Local Plan Designation(s) 5. Proposed Local Zoning Designation(s) LUZ2004-03002 RL/COUNTY A-E/COUNTY RH MHDR m. Site Description 1. Parcel number(s) of area(s) proposed to be amended 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 (include SectionITwp/RnglSub/BlkILot) 2. Acreage 3. Location 4.4 2025 NORTH IDGHLAND A VENUE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS TWO DWELLING UNITS BA YSHORE BROADWAY. INC. 4. Existirig use 5. Existing density 6. Name of project (if applicable) IV. Verification of Local Action 1. Verification of local action to approve amendment to local plan and transmittal of amendment to Countywide Plan Map; and/or copy of local ordinance proposinglapprovingplan amendment authorizing request for amendment of Countywide Plan Map. V. Other Pertinent Information 1. Submittal letter from the local jurisdiction to the Executive Director requesting amendment to the Countywide FLUP. 2. Disclosure of Interest Statement with names and addresses of the application! representative and property owner. 3. Proposed local ordinance number and status. x x 4. Staff report and local action to date. 5. Attach local plan and zoning. maps. x X 8. Map clearly indicating amendment location. X X X X 6. Include proposed demarcation line for environmentally sensitive areas (if applicable). 7. Legal description. 9. Plan Amendment Application. X S:\Plann.ing DepartmentlC D IN.Aru1 Use Amendmenrs\LUZ2004\LUZ2004-03002 2043 N. Highland\PPCu.l!Z2004-03002 PPC FLUP APPUCATION.doc . . A .~~. ". CDB Meeting Date: ~1~ Case Number: Ll; ~ 2 Agenda Item: E-4 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Leonard Chetkin and Mary.Chetkin. APPLICANT: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE: Alex Panik (panik Engineering, Inc.) LOCATION: 2025 North Highland Avenue. REQUEST: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low (RL) Classification (County) to Residential High (RR) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and (b) Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City of Clearwater) (pending ANX2004-03004). SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 191,664 square feet or 4.4 acres DIM:ENSIONS OF SITE: 567 feet wide by 287 feet deep PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Single-family dwellings Multi-family dwellings' - '-~ -'....' PLAN CATEGORY: Current Category: Proposed Category: Residential Low (RL) (County) Residential High (RR) (City) Staff Report - CommUnity Development Boaid - May 1 8,2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 1 . . . . ZONING DISTRICT: Current District: Proposed District: ~-~1 ! '~ ~. . ~~:~ -: l( i -Nio. .. ...... ~j A- E, Agricultural Estate;(CoUtity)._~ MHDR, Medium HiglfDeiisifyK~idential (City) EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Multi-familyresidential South: Single-family residential East: Multi-family residential West: Single-family residential ANALYSIS: This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves three parcels ofland, approximately 4.4 acres in area included in a companion application to annex the overall property into the City of Clearwater (Case# ANX2004-03004). The site is currently occupied by two single-family dwellings and has a FLUP designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning classification of A-E, Agricultural Estate (County). The applicant is requesting to amend the FLUP designation of the site to the Residential High (RH) classification and to rezone it to the :MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. If approved, the site will be developed with attached dwellings. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the density of the amendment request, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is required. I. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Section 4-603.F.l] Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in support of the proposed land use plan amendment are as indicated below: 2.1 Objective -The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. . 2.2.1 Policy _ On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promotinginfill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. "~''''- '"",r"o ,,3 .~'O Goal _ A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. 5.1.1 Policy _ No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection, and drainage) to fall below minimuni. acceptable levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified consistent with provisions of Staff Report _ Community Development Board - May 18,2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 2 ;'. . . ,.. the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. 16.1 Objective - Assure an adequate supply of housing in Clearwater by providing for additional new dwelling units in a variety of types, costs, and locations to meet the needs of the residents of the City of Clearwater. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. II. CONSISTENCY "WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The purpose of the proposed Residential High (RH) category, as specified in Section 2.3.3.3.1 of the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The Residential High (RH) category is generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are high density residential in nature; and in areas seiving as an urban cen,ter. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network and are served by mass transit in a manner that provides an alternative to individual automobile use. This designation is generally not appropriate for coastal high hazard and evacuation level "A" areas. The proposed use of the property for a townhome development is consistent with the purposes of the Residential High (RH) category. The site is adjacent to property currently used for high density residential purposes and is located along a major arterial, North Highland Avenue. The site is also located in close proximity to Sunset Point Road, another major arterial. The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational characteristics of the Countywide Plan. ID. COMPATffiILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER OF THE CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Section 4-602.F.2 & 4-603.F.3} PrimaiiIy single- and mwti-family dwellings characterize North Highland Avenue, between Union Street and Sunset Point Road. There are a variety of non-residential uses located farther to the north of the site at the southeast corner of North Highland Avenue and Union Street. Offices and retail uses are located at the southeast and west corners of North Highland Avenue and Sunset Point Road. Residential High (RH) future land use is located to the north and east of the site, while Residential Low (RL) future land use is located farther to the north of the site. Residential High (RR) dominates the land use to the north and east of the property while Residential Urban (RU) land use is located to the west and south. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 3 . . The existing surrounding uses include single-family dwellings to the west and south and multi- family residential dwellings to the north and east. Office buildings are located to the north and northwest of the site. The proposed FLUP designation and rezoning is in, character with the overall FLUP designation along this block and is compatible with surrounding uses. IV. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES, As stated earlier, the subject site is approximately 4.4 acres in area and is presently occupied by two single-family dwellings. Based on a maximum permitted density of five units per acre in the ' Residential Low (RL) category, 22 dwelling units could be constructed on this site. The allowable development potential in the Residential High (RH) category is 30 units per acre, which would allow 132 dwelling units to be constructed on this site. Roadways The accepted methodology for reviewing the transportation impacts of, proposed plan amendments is based on the Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guidelines. The PPC's traffic generation rates have been calculated for the subject site based on the existing and proposed FLUP categories and are included in the next table. ~..,;;' .>",;_:':.::t:'::.:;"<'~2:~:~~;':";~;:(;.';L'::::M~~MiUMd?:pumtti'<t~IC, " ':., .. Maximum Daily Added Potential Tri s N/ A 224 805 581 Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Tri S3 N/A 21 76 55 Volume of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road to 15,200 15,424 16,005 581 Union Street LOS of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road to C C C C Union Street Nt A = Not Applicable LOS = Level-of-Service 1 = Based on PPC calculations of 51 trips per acre per day for the Residential Low Future Land Use Category. 2 = Based on PPC calculations of 183 trips per acre per day for the Residential High Future Land Use Category. 3 = Based on MPO K-factor. Source: "The Rules" of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Based on the 2003 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Report, the segment of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road and Union Street has a LOS of F. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study prepared by Avid Engineering that concluded that this segment of Highland Avenue is actually operating at a LOS C. Upon further review of the :MPO Level 'of Service ~eport, the Clearwater Traffic Operations Division determined that the report did not include existing turn lanes at Union Street and Sunset Point Road and did not account for construction underway along Highland Avenue (patricia Avenue) north of this segment. Based on information provided by the City, the MPO has revised the LOS. for this segment of North Highland Avenue between Union Street and Sunset Point Road from F to C. Traffic from the subject site will be distributed to North Highland Avenue. Based on a traffic impact study prepared by the applicant, the anticipated increase in PM peak trips will not degrade the LOS for Highland Avenue. Staff Report _ Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 4 . . Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have also been analyzed for the level of vehicle trips that could be generated based on the fustitute of Transportation Engineer's Manual. Existing ZoningIFuture Land Use Plan 22dwellingwnts N/A N/A TownhomelCondo (5.86 trips/dwelling unit) Apartments (6.63 trips/dwelling unit) Proposed ZoningIFuture Land Use Plan 132 dwelling units 132 dwelling units 774 563 71 49 875 664 88 66 The City of Clearwater Engineering Department has concluded based on the traffic impact study px:ovided by the applicant that the transportation impacts associated with this land use plan amendment are minimal and will not degrade the LOS of Highland Avenue. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the increase in PM peak trips will have no impact on the operational efficiency of the signalized intersections within this segment of Highland Avenue. Mass Transit The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The total miles of fixed route service will not change; the subject site is located along an existing transit route and headways are less than or equal to one hour. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) bus service is available along North Highland Avenue. Water The current FLUP category could use up to 5,500 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, water demand could approach approximately 33,000 gallons per day. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for water. \Vastewater The current FLUP category could produce up to 4,400 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, sewer demand could approach approximately 26,400 gallons per day. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for wastewater. Solid Waste The current Residential Low FLUP category would result in the production of 56 tons of solid waste per year. Under the proposed FLUP category, the proposed attached dwellings could generate 335 tons of solid waste per year. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for solid waste disposal. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18,2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 5 . . Recreation and Open Space As the proposed future land use plan and zoning designations will permit the development of up to 132 dwelling units, payment ofa Open Space, Recreation Land and Recre~tion Facility1mpact fee will be required. The amount of this fee is dependent on the number of developed units and will be addressed and paid during the site plan review process. V. ThlPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT [Section 4-603.F.5.] Prior to development of the subject property, site plan approval will be required. At that time, the stormwater management system will be required to meet all City and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) stormwater management criteria. Water quantity and quality will be controlled in compliance with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. As there are no wetlands on the subject site that could be impacted by future development, the natural environment will not be affected. VI. LOCATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES [Section 4-602 .F.6.] The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets and ownership lines. The location' of the proposed MHDR, Medium ,High Density Residential District boundaries are logical and consolidates this site into the appropriate zoning district. It will blend into the existing MHDR, Medium ,High Density Residential District to the north and east and the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District to the south. vu. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-602.F.1.and .2.] The existing land use plan category and zoning district permits a density of five dwelling units per acre and an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 0.6. The, proposed Residential High (RH) land use category and MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District' is more intensive and permits a density of 30 dwelling units per acre and an ISR of 0.85. The size of the subject site is 191,664 square feet in area. It exceeds the minimum lot area requirement of 15,000 square feet and minimum lot width requirement of 150 feet for attached dwellings in the :MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. The proposed use of this property is consistent with the uses allowed in the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential zoning distriCt and the site exceeds minimum lot size requirements. Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning district designation does not guarantee the right to develop on the subject property. Transportation concurrency must be met, and the property owner will have to comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested. Staff Report _ Community Development Board - May 1 S, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 6 . . . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS An amendment of the FLUP from the Residential Low (RL) category to the Residential High (RH) category and a rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District to the :MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District for the subject site is requested. This 4.4 acre site exceeds the minimum requirements for the proposed use of the property as attached dwellings. The neighborhood is surrounded by multi- and single-family residential dwellings to the north, south, east and west. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The proposed Residential High (RH) Future Land Use classification and I\1HDR, Medium High Density Residential zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the following actions and conditions on the request: ACTIONS: 1. Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low Classification (RL) (County) to the Residential High (RU) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and 2. Rezon.mg from the A-E, Agricultural Estates (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City) (pending ANX2004-03004). Prepared by Planning Department staff: Mark T. Parry, Planner - Attachments: Application Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Land Use Plan Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Site Photographs S: \Plan llillg Departmellt\C D BlLand Use AmelldmentslLUZ 2004lLUZ2004-03002 2025 N Highland Bayshore Broadway, IllclLUZ2004-03002 Staff Report, doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18,2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 7 . . ;. From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11 :20 AM To: Parry, Mark Subject: FW: Highland Avenue LOS Corrections , I believe I sent this to you before, but please make sure this is in the file. You will need to include this in our submission to ppe. --Original Message-- From: Bertels, Paul Sent: Wednesday, May OS, 2004 9:45 AM To: . Oayton, Gina Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: Highland Avenue LOS Corrections The section of Highland Avenue between Union Street and Sunset Point Road was listed as LOS F in the 2003 LOS Report published by the MPO. This was due to the fact that the inputs into the computer model for this section omitted the left turn and right turn lanes at Union Street which is the PM Peak Hour Direction. When values were inputted into those fields the corrected LOS came out as LOS C. It is important to note that the sections of Highland Avenue/Patricia Avenue to. the north also went from an F to a D due to the improvements that are currently underway in Dunedin which involve the widening of Patricia Avenue to 3 lanes from 2 lanes. This should result in this segment of Patricia Avenue from Union Street to S.R. 580 being removed from the constrained corridor list in the next Countywide Concurrency Test Statement. Paul Bertels Manager Traffic Operations Division 727-562-4794 Paul.Berte/s@MyC/earwater.com . . ATTACHMENT 4 Dr 't July 12. I t 4 . Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater - Theresa Goodman stated that this 4.4-acre parcel is located generally on the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgeland Road The proposed amendment submitted by the City of Clearwater is a request to change the plan designation from Residential Low and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay to Residential High and WaterlDrainage Feature Overlay. The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. The subject site is comprised of two single-family homes. Approval of the proposed amendment would allow the site to be developed with homes at a density of up to 30 dwelling units per acre and is proposed for development with 132 town homes. Theresa Goodman presented the case findings and, based on the background data and analysis, it is being recommended that the proposed amendment to Residential High be denied, and in the alternative that the Residential Medium category be approved, subject to the City limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the city's Concurrency Management System. Gina Clayton advised members that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) report used for traffic analysis by the City contained an error on the level of service grade for this portion of Highland A venue. Ms. Clayton stated that the report identifies this segment of Highland Avenue as being LOS "F" however, it is LOS "C", a discrepancy explained by an omission of existing turning lane in the model. Rick MacAulay asked if this would change the PPC staff recommendation and Theresa Goodman indicated that it would not. Ms. Goodman went on to explain that the PPC staff uses Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) tables to evaluate traffic impacts and uses a "daily" LOS. The MPO calculates impacts using a different methodology and peak hours. . . .- ATTACHMENT 4 , Inut a r It J I, 1 Gina Clayton went on to say that the subject site is adjacent to a parcel with a plan designation of Residential High and given that designation'should the property owner desire to redevelop the site to utilize the higher density, they would be able to do so. Discussion ensued regarding density and whether or not other applicable code restrictions might prevent the property from achieving 30 units per acre. Rick MacAulay asked whether or not Ms. Clayton felt that the alternate compromise recommendation to Residential Medium was a "deal breaker" for this subject site. Ms. Clayton responded that she was uncertain, as contact with the property owner reveled _ only that they wished to move forward with the request to RH. Lastly, Ms. Clayton added that the site orientation which fronts on Highland Avenue and only abuts three single-family residences should be given favorable consideration with respect to this request. Gordon Beardslee informed members that he has traveled this corridor often and that the character of the area is single-family in nature. Dean Neal moved approval of the PPC staff recommendation, including the supplemental recommendation. The motion was seconded by Gordon Beardslee and approved. (Vote 9-1; Clearwater representative dissenting) e - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: October 19,2004 AGENDA ITEM NO. Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D Public Hearing D County Administrator's SiQnature: Subiect: Proposed Regular Amendment to the Countywide Land Use Plan. fJ.L.I ~V"'O)6#:?L Deoartment: Planning Department Staff Member Resoonsible: Brian K. Smith, Director Recommended Action: IT IS RECOMMENDED THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SITTING AS THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY, TAKE ACTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL (PPC) RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND GIVE THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO THE PPC FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. Summary Exolanation/BackQround: Case #CW 04-35 is a submittal by the City of Clearwater. This is a 4.4-acre proposal located on the east side of Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. This is the area just south of Union Street. The proposal is to go from Residential Low (up to 5 units an acre) to Residential High (up to 30 units an acre) with a Water Drainage Feature Overlay. The PPC has made a recommendation of denial without prejudice. The Board originally took up this case as the CPA at its August 10, 2004 meeting. At that time, the developer requested a continuance to allow them the opportunity to develop an agreement that would limit the number of units per acre to less than 30 units an acre, as called for in the category. The developer's intent was to limit the number to 22 units per acre for the project. It was the developer's intent to then be able to provide this alternative to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board took action to continue the matter for 60 days. The case has now been brought back to the CPA for action. Since the case was not taken back to the PPC and only continued, the original PPC recommendation remains the same, which is denial without prejudice. County staff recommends that the Board take action to concur with the PPC recommendation of denial without prejudice. FiscallmoactlCostlRevenue Summary: None Revised 07-18-03 Page 1 of 2 ~. . . SUSAN LA TV ALA CHAIRMAN . I ~ -sIP;" '(r'"Sl'l'., . ;. ,"' ~ ~~- -'~ \ +-,~- ,,\ ., ..' ~-:~ ~ ' \1. ".- t 'e;..~;' '. :..s:;8~' "" .. ' ~....~ ~ '\0:1" .- ~~'<':... - October 19,2004 \'lU V U 4 Ai! 14 . (-,r: -. C~ ~~j i ," ''';'". .'.) ". .. '~ .' '4 1 The Honorable Brian Aungst, Mayor /City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Dear Mayor Aungst: At its October 19, 2004 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners, acting as the CPA, took action to approve Case #CW 04-35. This action was subject to the filing of a restrictive covenant with Pinellas County that restricts the permitted density on the subject property to a maximum of22 dwelling units per acre. The Ordinance associated with this action is attached. Sincerely, ~ofc?l-v~ SUSAN LATVALA Chairman Pinellas County Commission Attachment cc: Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director CPA \Corresp.ck.pg 4 "PINELLAS COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" I' .... PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER . . I ORDINANCE NO. I' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON CASE NUMBER CW 04-35 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, a proposed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, which is an element of the Countywide Comprehensive Plan of Pinellas County, Florida, has been presented at a public hearing to the Board of County Commissioners in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority; and WHEREAS, notices and advertisements of public hearings have been accomplished as required by Chapter 73-594, Laws of Florida, as amended; and WHEREAS, procedures of the Special Act and County Charter have been followed concerning the Pinellas Planning Council and the Countywide Planning Authority for proposed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater initiated a proposed amendment which was considered at a public hearing by the Pinellas Planning Council on July 21, 2004, with recommendation. made by the Council that is documented in the Council rep9rt referred to as Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted a public hearing and taken action that is . documented by ordinance for approvals or partial approvals and partial denials and by resolution for denials, with both documents including the relevant Council reports as attached. . . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, acting as the Countywide Planning Authority in regular meeting duly' assembled on October 19,2004, as follows: Section 1 - Amending the Countywide Future Land Use Plan The Countywide Future Land Use Plan for Pinellas County adopted in Section 3(a) of Ordinance 89-4 is amended to reflect the change adopted as follows: #CW 04-35 4.4 acres generally located on the east side of North Highland Avenue al the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road, from Residential Low and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay to Residential High and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay, subject to the filing of a restrictive covenant with Pinellas County that restricts the permitted density on the. subject property to a maximum of 22 dwelling units per acre. The restrictive covenant shall run with the land. Section 2 - Severability If any Section, Subsection, sentence,. clause, phrase, or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction, such holding shall not be construed to render the remaining provisions of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3 - Filing of Ordinance: Effective Date A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Secretary of State with the Ordinance and Attachment "A" to be filed with Clerk of the Circuit Court. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. . / . ATTACHMENT A #CW 04-35 i . 'I / . . " PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM \... , ..... I AGENDA ITEM: IVB-9. I .1 MEETING DA!E: July 21,2004 I SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map From:' Residential Low - RL To: Residential High - RH Area: 4.4 acres CASE #: CW 04-35 JURISDICTION: City of Clearwater (LUZ 2004-03002) LOCATION: On the east side of North Highland A venue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. TYPE: Regular Map Amendment / RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based On Accompanying Findings (I. A. & B. [1-6]), Recommend That the Proposed Amendment to Residential High be Denied. and in the Alternative that the Residential Medium Category be Approved. Subiect to the City' Limiting Traffic Impacts Pursuant to the City's Concurrency Management System. L FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following findings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. B. A summarized evaluation of the impact of the amendment on the SlX Relevant Countywide Considerations is as follo.ws: PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council recoinmended denial without. preiudice of the .change from . Residential Low to Residential High. (Vote.9..2; City of Clearwater and Group C representatives dissenting) I . COUNTYW/DEPLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: I 1 F:\USERS\WPDOCS\LU\CASESI04 ......lluly\RcponsICW04-3Sr.cIw.doc . . . SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater I) Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules - The proposed amendment area is not consistent with the locational characteristics of the Residential High category, as enumerated in the Countywide Rules. Also, the proposal is not compatible with the surrounding residential uses or the majority of the future land use designations. However, the Residential Medium category is considered consistent With the locational characteristics in the Countywide Rules as well as the surroun~g residential uses and future land use designations. 2) Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard - The amendment area is located on Highland Avenue, which is designated as an arterial roadway and is . operating at. LOS "F" from Sunset Point Road to Union Street. Staff'~ trafIk estimates indicate that the proposed amendment would further degrade the,existing. conditions and the potential Year 2025 traffic volume on Highland Avenue. The alternative Residential Medium designation would lessen the impact expected. 3) ScenicfNon-Commercial Corridors (SNCC) - The amendment area is not located within a SNCC, so these policies are not applicable. 4), ..ICoastal High Hazard Areas (CRRA) - The amendment area i~ not located within .~ a CIffiA, so these policies are not applicable. . 5) Desi~ated DeveJopment/Redevelopment Areas - The amendment area is not in a Central Business District, Community Redevelopment District or Activity Center, so these policies are not applicable. 6) Adjacent To or Impacting An Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Educational Facility - The amendment area is being annexed by Clearwater and does not adjoin or impact another jurisdiction, nor is it adjacent to a public educational facility. However, the proposed amendment increases the number of dwelling units in this area, thereby potentially increasing the number of students to be served by the public school system.~ This increase can be accommodated through the School District's Choice System of student assignment. , In consideration of and based upon these findings, it is recommended that the proposed . . amendment of the Countywide Plan Map to Residential High be denied. and in the alternative the Residential Medium category be approved. subiect to the City'limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the' City's Concurrencv Management Svstem. 2 .. SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater IL BACKGROUND This regular amendment to the Countywide Plan Map has been submitted by Clearwater to the Council for review in accordance with Division 5.5 of the Countywide Rules. Parcel ID#: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 Existing Use: Two single-family homes Proposed Use: 132 Multi-family residential units Analysis: The proposed amendment from Residential Low to Residential High would allow the site to be developed with homes at.a density of up to 30 dwelling units per acre. The 4.4-acre site, located on the east side of Highland Avenue in Clearwater, is proposed for development with 132 town homes. . Due to. the size of the amendment area and the Countywide Plan category proposed by the City, the amendment is considered a regular amendment and has been reviewed according to three . Relevant Countywide Considerations: Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules, Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard, and Adjacency To or Impact Upon An Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Educational Facility, as set forth below: Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules: Two single-family homes occupy the wooded amendment area. Apartments owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority occupy the abutting property to' the north and east, designated Residential High, 30 units per acre. To the south and west are single-family residential neighborhoods, designated Residential Urban, 7.5 units per acre. The existing FLUP category of Residential Low could be considered generally consistent with the site and the surrounding single-family area with the exception of its location on a more intensive/higher traffic arterial roadway, as opposed to a collector roadway, and with the other exception of its adjacency with the higher density residential apartment complex on the north and west. These two factors, the arterial roadway and the apartment complex, suggest that additional density could be considered for the site. The purpose of the proposed Residential High category as enumerated in the Countywide Rules is: It...to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as 3 .. . SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the. urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of"such areas..u As enumerated by the locational characteristics in the Countywide"Rules, Residential High is: U ...generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are high density residential in nature; and in areas serving as an urban center. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network and are served by mass transit in a manner that provides an alternative to individual automobile use. " The amendment area is not in close proximity to an urban activity center or other areas. that are " I high density residential in nature. The highest density use adjacent to the amendment area is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority to the north and east. and is built at approximately 20 units per acre, with a FLUP designation of Residential High - with 30 units per acre pemntted. Further removed to the north is a 96-unit complex built at 24 units per acre. South and west of the subject area there is an average of 4.3 units per acre, consisting of single-family homes. The homes immediately south of the amendment area are built at less than 3 units per acre. The uses in the vicinity of the proposed amendment, including the uses fronting Highland A venue, are predominantly single-family and built at less than 5 units per acre, with a FLUP designation of Residential Urban, or 7.5 units per acre. None of the areas. mentioned are likely to redevelop at the allowab.le density in the foreseeable future. The site does not contain wetlands or other pristine natural areas, but it does include a number of large trees that would be under pressure to be removed or compromised by a town home development built at 30 units per acre. . The site does have direct access to Highland Avenue, which is classified as a two-lane undivided arterial roadway and is served each hour by the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. In s~ary, the site is not appropriate to be developed "in a highly intensive residential manner", nor is the proposed amendment to Residential High "consistent with the qualities and natural resource characteristics of the surrounding area." Therefore, the proposal is not consistent with the Countywide Plan and Rules. In the alternative, the Residential Medium. category allows residential development at a density of up to.15 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of the Residential Medium category as enumerated in the Countywide Rules is: U ...to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a moderately intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. " 4 '. SUBJECT: Case CW 04-3 - Clearwater AB enumerated by the Iocational. characteristics in the Countywide Rules, Residential Medium is: "...generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are medium density residential in nature; and in areas serving as a transition between less urban and more urban residential and mixed use areas. These areas are typically in. close proximity to and may have direct . access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network" The amendment area is not witl;rin or in close proximity to an urban activity center, but is in an area with average development characteristics that more closely resemble medium density. Additionally, building at 15 units per acre, half of what is proposed, will have a lower impact on Highland A venue, and should allow the development to be constructed in a manner that preserves the majority of the existing tree canopy. Lastly, the Residential Medium category serves as a transition from the 20 unit per acre apartments on the north and east, to the single-family areas on the south and west. This category can also be considered more compatible with the surrounding single-family residential areas than the proposed density of30 units per acre. Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard: A summary of the Transportation Impact Analysis is included as Attachment 1. The amendment - area is located on Highland Avenue, a two lane undivided arterial. Using -the methodology adopted as part of the Traffic Characteristics Study conducted for the PPC by Tindale-Oliver, Inc., this roadway is operating at LOS "F" between Sunset Point Road and Union Street. The proposed Residential High category has a general trip generation rate of 183 vehicles per day per acre (vtpd), higher than the 51 vtpd expected to be generated by Residential Low uses. A 4.4- acre project developed with Residential High uses is anticipated to generate 805 trips, 581 more vtpd than the same site developed with Residential Low uses. AB stated above, the existing and future (year 2025) LOS is "F" for Highland Avenue. The amendment to Residential High would worsen this condition as shown in the volume to capacity (v/c) table found in Attachment 1 (a number lower than one indicates capacity remaining on the roadway and higher than one indicates the volume above the estimated roadway capacity). The existing vie ratio is 1.17 and would increase to 1.21.. The year 2025 conditions are projected at a 1.22 vlc ratio without the amendment and 1.24 with amendment to Residential. High. In summary, the proposed Residential High category's vtpd is considerably higher than the existing Residential Low category.. The proposed amendment would therefore increase the existing and potential future traffic volumes on Highland A venue, which is already operating at LOS "F." 5 .. . SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater In the alternative, a change to Residential Medium would lessen the expected impacts. This category is expected to generate 422 vtpd for the amendment site, 383 ~~ss than the proposed Residential High (118 more than the existing Residential Low). The LOS would remain "P" with Residential Medium, but the vlc ratios would not increase as much, with ,the existing again at a 1.17 vlc ratio increasing to 1.19 with amendment to Residential Medium. The year 2025 projections would be a 1.22 vlc ratio (without the amendment) and 1~23, respectively, with Residential Medium. A supplemental recommendation has been added to this report to address the increase in traffic expected on Highland Avenue. The. City's. concurrency management standards allow an increase of up to 1 % without mitigation, and mitigation is required above that percentage point. Adjacent to or Impacting Another Jurisdiction or a Public Educational Facility: The amendment area is not adjacent to another jurisdiction, but may impact the publici: school system since it involves . residential uses that will likely include school age children. The amendment to Residential High would allow development of up to 132 dwelling units. Using the Pinellas County School District's standard ratio of 0.3 students per household, development of the site could bring an additional 40 students to this area. According to the representatives of the School District, these students will be accommodated through the Choice Plan. Additionally, while the amendment area is approximately ~ mile from the Dunedin Highland Middle School, no traffic circulation issues or problems are expected to be created by the development, nor is there any issue with respect to compatibility with the school. Local Government Transmittal: On June 17, 2004, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, acting as the applicant local government, gave initial approval to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan, and authorized an application for amendment of the Countywide Plan Map. In summary, the proposed amendment to Residential High is inconsistent with the Countywide Plan and Rules and the subject area is not' an appropriate location in which to apply this Countywide Plan category. In consideration of and based upon these findings, it is recommended that the proposed amendment of the Countywide Plan Map to Residential High be denied. and in the alternative the Residential Medium category be approved.. subiect to the City limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the City's Concurrencv Management Svstem. Planners Advisory Committee (PAC): At its meeting on July 12, 2004, the PAC recommended approval of the staff recommendation (Vote 9-1; Clearwater dissenting). The minutes from the PAC's discussion of this case are provided at the back of this report as Attachment 4. 6 SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater IlL LIST OF MAPS & ATTACHMENTS Map 1 Location. Map 2 Countywide Plan Category & Jurisdictional Map - Black & White Map 3 Aerial- Black & White Map 4 Countywide Plan Category - Color Attachment I Calculation of Traffic Impacts Attachment 2 PPC Disclosure of Interest Form Attachment 3 Attachment 4 Local Government Transmittal Package Draft PAC Minutes 7 ~ ::> 8 = ~ ::> o '" ,i :~ ,= MAP 1 CASE NO. CW04-35 ~ ~ PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL . GRAPHICS PREPARED BY THE OFFICE OF THE PINELLAS COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, nM SMITH Produced by MEnIT V2.1. Copyright 1991,1992 Pinella. County, Florida Properly Appraiser. All Rights Rese!'Yed. "~'.:r ,- :l . ... '. ~ ,- .~J~~ lNON STREET D C o II: I o c o II: //:= laJ _ 2 -~ _ _ c ~-a_- II: _ R~ -- ~CIR __'--- ...."'" ~ - ~- c ! if= =-= II: - s .---- ~c":: -~ - I'-' , III 'I-'-- ~ _rt. laJ Z iL ..J -< ~ "\.. . \. ~ RIOGELANE ROAD I ], . .], , . ~. , '.' ~.. ], \ i DRIVE '- ?---- &::\ I ;~ -I-:-i'v ~ I-- ~ _ f---'- <C I-- C <C fIl'-- 15 \H' ~ 9 -,-1-- it I-- \.... 1_- -~=1>~ iI ' , , I , , , ROAD I LEGEND RESIDENTW. MIXED USE ItESIIIEN'I:W. BUlW. BESlDENlUL LOll MEDIUJI JlESIDENTW. ESTATE BESlDENnAL MEDIUJI 1lESIDEN1:W. SUBtlllBAN BESIDENnAL mGll llI!:SIIlEI.'U&I. LOlr . . . ~ RESORT . . . . FACILITIES . .. OVERLA.Y ..RESORT FACILlTIES KEDIUJI -~ .. mGll BESlDENnAL VERY mGll r---l, : ' llI!:SIDl!NtI.&L L--.J 1lRBAN FROM: .~: '.0:;. ~~ =~ RESIDENTIAL/ OFFlCE/llETAIL III A A .. -) 7J ~]~~ ~ : I " ~ t----i~.,,;. . \" _ t-+[~~~ " ~ Ri'~~~~:~~~ -- -- - ~ . '8; BYRAM I I \ COHIIEReW. COJQ(ERCIAL NElGBBOlUlOOD COml!:llClAL IDm'ED COlDOlRCIAL RECRE.l.T10N COIDIERCIAL CENEIW. INDUsTRw. INDOS'l1lUl. IDm'ED INDUSTRUL GENERAL RL RESIDEN'lUL LOW liA.TER/DRAINAGE FAc:tLrrY OVERU.Y RH RESIDENTIAL mGB liATER/DIWNAGE F.LCIlJTr OVERLA.Y 1 rs~ TO: ACREAGE: 4.4 '\~ ~-=c U !5 e ---- ~ ~ ---J ~ --nfl"11 - -l HERON lr I I I" ~_ If II 1T' i -r OSPREY x- IITl T ~~.1I111 r 1-/ IBIS UNION ~, "'11 STREET ~ ;"~ '" laJ > !..:.- - '.' I-'-- - "-- '-- - --- - - ! ~~ D '8<' Z./',".i,,"" ........ ClA.eERLANlJ LANE ,/ lL ..... HUNTINGTON LANE ..../.. AI l ...I...-r .. T r v...A .. ~. ..... .. IA..I l.,'" / ~\ 'j, SOUVENIR ~IVE - - ,--- III ~ > ~! KRUSE LM I--- / k 1 1 - >-- PlCARDY CIRCLE -'- -/ --- _.1-- - I PUBUC!SEMI-PUBIJC SPECu.L..DESIGNATJeN PIlESEIrV.moH ~';"""'.L'l'Il:Il/ ; , IlIlAlNAGE . 1BI.TUIlE ~ ~r-c6-xw. ~ OOItlllDOB ~ ~ CBNTEII/ PImIARY SBCONIWI'r 1lIlCIlEU1ONI ,; OPEN SPACI! IIIS1Tl'll'l'JON.U. ~T10N/ COlIK1lNl'lT REDEVELOPKENT DISTIlICr CENDW. BUSINESS DIS1'IUC'1' [ MAP 4 CASE NO. CW04-35 ] J PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL GR1"'IIICS PZ!:P~ BY TIlE Dn'lCE OF TIlE PINELUS COUNTY PllOPEK1'1" lPPJUlSER. JD{ SMI1'B GIW'IIICS P1l2PlRED USING KEIllT '9ERSIO!< 2:, . · CW 04-35 - clearwatlt -ATTACHMENT 1 Table 1 Trip Generation Comparison . de Plan Cate 0 vs. Pro osed Conn ide Plan Cate 0 Plan Category Size in Acres Traffic Std. Total Trip (vtpd/ac) Generation d 404 51 224 Proposed Plan Category RH 404 183 805 Alternative Amendment Proposed By PPC Staff / RM 404 96 422 Table 2 Volume and Level of Service Compar1son Amendment to RH . Existinl! Condition Roadway Link W lout Amendment With Amendment # Current LOS V/C Volume LOS V/C Volume Union St. (From Keene 2190 6,451 C 040 6,676 C Al Rd. to Patricia Ave.) Highland Ave. (From 3750 15,200 F 1.17 15,651 1.21 F Sunset Point Rd. to Union St.) Future Condition Roadway Link W lout Amendment With Amendment # 2025 LOS V/C Volume LOS vie LRTP Volume Union St. (From Keene 2190 6,709 C .39 6,872 C .39 Rd. to Patricia Ave.) Highland Ave. (From 3750 16,726 F 1.22 17,051 F 1.24 Sunset Point Rd. to Union St.) Attachment 1 - Page 1 of 3 . CW 04-35 - Clearwater -ATTACHMENTl' .. Table 3 '''II Volume and Level of Service Comparison Alternative Amendment to RM Existin2 Condition ,I . . Roadway Link W lout Amendment With Amendment # Current LOS V/C Volume LOS V/C Volume Union St. (From Keene 2190 6,451 C .40 6,569 C .41 Rd. to Patricia Ave.) FlighlandAve.(From 3750 15,200 F 1.17 15,436 F 1.19 Sunset Point Rd. to Union . I St.) Future Condition I I Roadway Link W lout Amendment With Amendment # 2025 LOS V/C Volume LOS V/C LRTP Volume Union St. (From Keene 2190 6,709 C .39 6,764 C .39 Rd. to Patricia Ave.) Highland Ave. (From 3750 16,726 F 1.22 16,837 F 1.23 Sunset Point Rd. to Union St.) Table 4 MPO 2025 Cost Feasible PlanlTransportation Improvement Program Roadway Existing :MFa 2025 TIP Scheduled Classification Classification Improvements Union St. Two-lane Two-lane None undivided local undivided local arterial arterial Highland Ave. Two-lane Two-lane None undivided local undivided local arterial arterial Attachment 1 - Page 2 of 3 . . . CW 04-35 - Clearwater ttTTACHMENT 1 / I Notes Re: Traffic Tables: , 1. Traffic volumes are expressed in vehicle trips per day (vtpd) 2. Traffic standards are the trip generation rate standards in the Rules. 3. Traffic estimated for undeveloped parcels is added to the existing condition analysis. 4. Traffic estimated for developed land is accounted for in the MPO adopted traffic count (2003 Annual Level of Service Report). 5. Traffic estimated for future conditions based on Future Land Use Plan category is accounted for in the MPO adopted future volumes as reported in the 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). 6. Level of service and volume-te-capacity ratios (V/C) for both existing and future conditions is based on the FDOT table, "Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas." 7. Cumulative impacts based on FLUP amendments approved after January 1, 2001. 8. Levels of Service (LOS) are defined as follows: "A" A free flow condition. "B" A stable flow condition. "e" A relatively satisfactory traffic condition with good operating speeds. "D" An unstable traffic flow condition with only tolerable operating speeds. "E" An unstable traffic flow condition with momentary stoppages from congestion. "F" A forced-flow condition in which the facility acts as storage for vehicles backing up from a downstream bottleneck. Attachment 1 - Page 3 of 3 ~ . . Mr. David P. Healey July 21, 2004 Page 2 of3 , "'II . As identified in the May 3, 2004 report, North Highland A venue is ,under construction to the riorth of Union Street. This construction condition is temporary and would be expected ~o result in a temporary reduction in the travel' demand. ' . . Based on follow up discussions with the engineer who authored the petitioner's report, we understand that North Keene Road was recently reconstructed as a 4 lane roadway. The petitioner's engiIieer identified the additional capacity provided on Keene Road may be the result of the' reduction of traffic on North Highland A venue. We note that no $tatement was provided in the petitioner's. repOl;t to this effect. 'yve further note that the applicant did not, co~duct daily traffic counts on either Keene Road or Highland Avenue to substantiate that the ~provements on Keene Road has resulted in either a temporary or long term reduction in travel d~mand on Highland Avenue . We are concerned ,that the P.M. Turning Movement Count conducted between 4:00 pm and 6:00,pm may not adequately represent the peak hour conditions on , Highland Avenue. We base this concemon"the fact that the initial 15 minute period resulted in at~tal volume of 526 vehicles.. This was the highest 15 miDute' count and ~y be indication that the peak hour occurs prior to 4:00 pm. The applicants use of the 4:00 pm to 6:00,pm time period to develop 1i!e AADT maybe understating the actual daily conditions. Again, recent daily machine traffi~ co~ts would resolve this concern on way or another: ' We conducted an ArtPlan level of service analysis' usiIig the applicants turnirig movement data and other default level of service data. This analysis followed the PPC Land Use Plan Amendme!lt methodology. The results of this analysis are summarized below: Existin Conditions Pro' ected 2025 Conditions No Amendment D b WIth Amendment, D 0,', Based on the information available, we find that the, Pinellas Planning Council staff transportation analysis report was properly performed. The use of more detailed data provided in the petitioners report in our revised analysis results in improved level of service conditions. The ArtPlan'level of service we performed indicates that the existing conditions with no amendment and With the amendment are level of service D and D, respectively. When projected 2025 conditions are' reviewed using the ArtPlan type of analysis, the resulting level of service without and with the amendment are level of service . . 'I I ~ . .. w . / . . Mr. David P. Healey July 21, 2004 Page 3 of3 D arid D, respectively. This indicates that the effect of approval of the amendment is should be allowed from a transportation perspective. Should you have any q:uestions regarding the foregoiIig, please do not hesitate to contact Williani Roll at (813) 224-8862 or myself at (407) 896-9200. . Sincerely, Tindale - Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1f~~. Robert P. Wallace, P.E., AICP Vice-President RPW/wer . .cc: Theresa H. Goodman, AICP; Pinellas Planning Council William-E. Roll, Jr., AICP; Tindale Oliver & Associates, Inc. . . . . , ATTACHMENT 2. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST STATEMENT .. PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL CASE NUMBER * SUBMITTING GOVER1\TM:El\T'f El\T'fITY: CITY OF CLEARWATER PPC OR CITYrrOWN CASE NUMBER: LUZ2004-03002 PROPERTY OWNERS: BA YSHORE BROADWAY, INC. MR. ALEX PANIK P ANlK ENGINEERING, INC. 39326 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTII TARPON SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34689 REPRESENTATIVE: ANY OTHER PERSONS HA VlNG ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: Interests: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin & Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Contingent: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Upon Annexation, Land Use Amendment, & Rezoning o~ Property. Absolute: Name: Specific Interest Held: INDICATION AS TO WHETHER A CONTRACT EXISTS FOR SALE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, IF SO: Yes ~Contract is: Same as Above 'Contingent: Same as Above Absolute: All Parties To Contract: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin & Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Name: INDICATION AS TO WHETIIER THERE ARE ANY OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SUBJECT PROPERTY, IF SO: No . All Parties To Option: Name: Name: ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION WHICH APPLICANT MAY WISH TO SUBMIT PERTAINING TO REQUESTED PLAN AMENDMENT: * 1\TUMBER TO BE ASSIG1\TED BY PLANNING COUNCIL STAFF S:lPlanning DepartmentlC D BILand Use AmendmentriLUZ 2004\LUZ2004-03002 2043 N. HighlarrdlPPC.LUZ2004-03002 PPC DISCLOSURE STATEMEl'v7'.doc APPLICATION FOR C~E FUTURE LAND UWLAN AME~MENT Please complete all the information below as accurately as possible to ensure that the application for the land use plan amendment can be processed efficiently. Processing of the application will not be started until this form has been completed. If additional space is needed., please number and attach additional sheets.. . I. Countywide FLUP .Map Amendment Information 1. Current Countywide FLUP Designation 2. Proposed Countywide FLUP Designation II. Local Plan Map Amendment Information 1. Local Plan Map Amendment Case Number 2. Current Local Plan Designation(s) 3. Current Local Zoning Designation(s) 4. Proposed Local Plan Designation(s) 5. Proposed Local Zoning Designation(s) RL RH LUZ2004-03002 RUCOUNTY A-E1COUNTY RH MHDR m. Site Descriotion / 1. Parcel number(s) of area(s) proposed to be amended 02/29nS/00000/210/06oo 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 (mclude SectionfI'wp/RnglSubIBIkILot) 2. Acreage 3. Location 4.4 2025 NORTH IDGHLAND A VENUE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS TWO DWELLING UNITS BA YSHORE BROADWAY. INC. 4. Existing use 5. Existing density 6. Name of project (if applicable) IV. Verification of Local Action 1. Verification of local action to approve amendment to local plan and transmittal of amendment to Countywide Plan Map; andlor copy of local ordinance proposing/approving plan amendment authorizing request for amendment of Countywide Plan Map. V. Other Pertinent Information 1. Submittal letter from the local jurisdiction to the Executive Director requesting amendment to the Countywide FLUP. 2. Disclosure of Interest Statement with names and addresses of the application! representative and property owner. 3. Proposed local ordinance number and status. 4. Staff report and local action to date. 5. Attach local plan and zoning maps. 6. Include proposed demarcation line for environmentally sensitive areas (if applicable). x x 8. Map clearly indicating amendment location. x X X X X X 7. Legal description. 9. Plan Amendment Application. X S:\Planning DepartTnEflto.C D IN..and Use AmeruJmentilLUZ 2{)()4\Lr!Z2004-03002 2043 N. HighlarulV'PC\LUZ2004-03002 PPC FLUP APPUCATION.doc J . .{.. . . .". CDB Meeting Date: ~1~_ Case Number: L"l; 2 2 Agenda Item: E-4 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEP ARTl\ffiNT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION OVVNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: , / LOCATION: REQUEST: SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: DIMENSIONS OF SITE: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: PLAN CATEGORY: Current Category: Proposed Category: Leonard Chetkin and Mary, Chetkin. Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Alex Panik (panik Engineering, Inc.) 2025 North Highland Avenue. (a) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low (RL) Classification (County) to Residential High (RH) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and (b) Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City of Clearwater) (pending ANX2004-03004). 191,664 square feet or 4.4 acres 567 feet wide by 287 feet deep Single-family dwellings Multi-family dwellings . "'.. --"~'---"i Residential Low (RL) (County) Residential High (RR) (City) Staff Report - CommUnity Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 1 . . . . ZONING DISTRICT: Current District: Proposed District: ~....., ~ ~ ," . ~.!.. ..: " .' .. l i. ,i ':'- ' ,', . .~ A-E, Agricultural Estate'(CoUfity""~ MHDR, Medium HiglfDensit)i1t'~idential (City) "II .t. i. EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Multi-familyresidential South: Single-family residential East: Multi-family residential West: Single-family residential ANALYSIS: This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves three parcels ofland, approximately 4.4 acres in area included in a companion application to annex the overall property into the City of Clearwater (Case# ANX2004-03004). The site is currently occupiep by two single-family dwellings and has a FLUP designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning classification of A-E, Agricultural Estate (County). The applicant is requesting to amend the FLUP designation of the site to the Residential High (RH) classification and to rezone it tq the :MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. If approved, the site will be developed With attached dwellings. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the density of the amendment request, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is required. I. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Section 4-603.F.l] Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensjve Plan in support of the proposed land use plan amendment are as indicated below: 2.1 Objective -The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. . 2.2.1 Policy _ On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill developm~t and/or planned developments that are compatible. ',.'_ 'V"u ,.3:0 Goal - A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote in:fill development. 5.1.1 Policy _ No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection, and drainage) to fall below rninimun'l acceptable levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified consistent with provisions of Staff Report _ Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 2 ;". . . ,. the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. 16.1 Objective - Assure an adequate supply of housing in Clearwater by providing, for additional new dwelling units in a variety of types, costs, and locations to meet the needs of the residents of the City of Clearwater. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. IT. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The purpose of the proposed Residential High" (RR) category, as specified in Section 2.3.3.3.1 of the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive /qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The . Residential High (RH) category is generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are high density residential in nature; and in areas sei-ving as an urban cen.ter. These areas are typically in close prOximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network and are served by mass transit in a manner that provides an alternative to individual automobile use. This designation is generally not appropriate for coastal high hazard and evacuation level "A" areas. The proposed use of the property for a townhome development is consistent with the pmposes of the Residential High (RH) category. The site is adjacent to property currently used for high density residential purposes and is located along a major arterial, North Highland Avenue. The site is also located in close proximity to Sunset Point Road, another major arterial. The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the pmpose and locational characteristics of the Countywide Plan. ill. COl\1PATmILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER OF THE CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Section 4-602.F.2 & 4-603.F.3] primaiuy single- and m1ilti-family dwellings characterize North Highland Avenue, between Union Street and Sunset Point-Road. There are a variety of non-residential uses located farther to the north of the site at the southeast comer ofNo$ Highland Avenue and Union Street. Offices and retail uses are located a~ the southeast and west comers of North Highland Avenue and Sunset Point Road. Residential High. (RH) future land use is located to the north and east of the site, while Residential Low (RL) future land use is located farther to the north of the site. Residential High (RR) dominates the land use to the north and east of the property while Residential Urban (RU) land use is located to the west and south. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 3 . . The existing surrounding uses include single-family dwellings to the west and south and multi- family residential dwellings to the north and east. Office buildings are located to the north and northwest of the site. The proposed FLUP designation and rezoning is in character with the overall FLUP designation along this block and is compatible with surrounding hses. IV. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACaITIES, As stated earlier, the subject site is approximately 4.4 acres in area and is presently occupied by two single-family dwellings. Based on a maximum permitted density of five units per acre in the ' Residential Low (RL) category, 22 dwelling units could be constructed on this site. The allowable development potential in the Residential High (RH) category is 30 units per acre, which would allow 132 dwelling units to be constructed on this site. Roadways The accepted methodology for reviewing the transportation impacts of, proposed plan amendments is based on the Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guidelines. The PPC's traffic generation rates have been calculated for the subject site based on the existing and proposed FLUP categories and are included in the next table.' . .~ '"i ~ "';::.~~r.~.:t>:;'~':";l;Qt;~:;;':;;~~~. ,;L~~::j'[~Ui~l\~'Q[EmliI)~ld'" :',~.",,~: 'if;;;:",;:'::.:: ;:;~'::.:i:~.i~ .;.\,';..:,}:', ~', :,::... :,~:r~:;lt~~3Iit~~I~~i%~~l~tl1:i~:~;~':~~~~~}~:~~.::6f~~f:~l~~,'~~~~~~~,~;~,~~~t ;):;r~&~11:t; :'~t~~~t::!" Maximum Daily Added Potential Trips N/ A 224 805 581 . Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trios3 N/A 21 76 55 Volume of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Roacho 15,200 15,424 16,005 581 Union Street LOS of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road to C C C C Union Street N/A = Not Applicable IDS = Lcvcl-<Jf-scriice 1 = Based on PPC calculations of 51 trips per acre per day for the Residential Low Future Land Use Category. 2 = Based on PPC calculations of 183 trips per acre per day for the Residential High Future Land Use Category. 3" Based on MPO K-filctor. Source: <<The Rules" of the Countywide Future Latul Use Pllln Based on the 2003 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Report, the segment of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road and Union Street has a LOS of F. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study prepared by Avid Engineering that concluded that this segment of Highland Avenue is actually operating at a LOS C. Upon further . ' review of the :MFO Level .of Service ~eport, the Clearwater Traffic Operations Division determined that the report did not include existing turn lanes at Union Street and Sunset Point Road and did not account for construction underway along Highland Avenue (patricia Avenue) north of this segment. Based on information provided by the City, the MPO has revised the LOS. for this segment of North Highland Avenue between Union Street and Sunset Point Road from F to C. Traffic from the subject site will be distributed to North Highland Avenue. Based on a traffic impact study prepared by the applicant, the anticipated increase in"PM peale. trips will not degrade the LOS for Highland A v~ue. Staff Report _ Community Development Board-: May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 4 . . . Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have also been analyzed for the level of vehicle trips that could be generated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Manual. Proposed ZoningIFuture Land Use Plan Townhome/Condo 132 dwelling 774 563 71 49 (5.86 trips/dwelling unit) units Apartments 132 dwelling 875 664 88 66 (6.63 trips/dwelling unit) units / The City of Clearwater Engineering Department has concluded based on the traffic impact study px:ovided by the applicant that the transportation impacts associated with this land use plan amendment are minimal and will not degrade the LOS of Highland Avenue. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the increase in PM peak trips will have no impact on the operational efficiency of the signalized intersections within this segment of Highland Avenue. Mass Tr~sit The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The total miles of fixed route service will not change; the subject site is located along an existing transit route and headways are less than or equal to one hour. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) bus service is available along North Highland Avenue. Water The current FLUP category could use up to 5,500 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, water demand could approach approximately 33,000 gallons per day. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for water. \Vastewater The current FLUP category could produce up to 4,400 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, sewer demand could approach approximately 26,400 gallons per day. The . proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for wastewater. Solid Waste The current Residential Low FLUP category would result in the production of 56 tons of solid waste per year. Under the proposed FLUP category, the proposed attached dwellings could .generate 335 tons of solid waste per year. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for solid waste disposal. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 5 . . Recreation and Open Space As the proposed future land use plan and zoning designations will permit the development of up to 132 dwelling units, payment of.a Open Space, Recreation Land and Recre~tion Facility impact fee will be required. The amount of this fee is dependent on the number of developed units and will be addressed and paid during the site plan review process. v. IMP ACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT [Section 4-603.F.5.] " , Prior to development of the subject property, site plan approval will be required. At that time, the stormwater management system will be required to meet all City and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) stormwater management criteria. Water quantity and quality will be controlled in compliance with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. As there are no wetlands on the subjeCt site that could be impacted by future development, the natural environment will not be affected. , I VI. LOCATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES [Section 4-602 .F.6.] I , I The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets and ownership lines. The location' of the proposed MHDR, Medium .High Density Residential District boundaries are logical and consolidates this site into the appropriate zoning district. It will blend into the existing MHDR, Medium .High Density Residential District to the north and east and the LIvIDR, Low Medium Density Residential District to the south.. VII. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-602.F.1. and .2.] The existing land use plan category and zoning district permits a density of five dwelling writs per acre and an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 0.6. The, proposed Residenti,al High (RH) land use category and MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District' is more intensive and permits a density of 30 dwelling units per acre and an ISR of 0.85. The size of the subject site is 191,664 square feet in area. It exceeds the minimum lot area requirement of 15,000 sq~e feet and minimum lot width requirement of 150 feet for attached dwellings in the MHDR,Medium High Density Residential District. The proposed use of this property is consistent with the uses allowed in the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential zoning district and the site exceeds minimum lot siz,~ requirements. Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning district designation does not guarantee the right to develop on the subject property. Transportation concurrency must be met, and the property owner will have to comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested. ' Staff Report _ Community Development Board - May 1 S, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 6 ,. ,. . . SUM:MARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS An amendment of the FLUP from the' Residential Low (RL) category to the Residential High (RH) category and a rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District to the :MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District for the subject site is requested. This 4.4" acre site exceeds the minimum requirements for the proposed use of the property as attached dwellings. The neighborhood is surrounded by multi- ~d single-family residential dwellings to the north, south, east and west. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The proposed Residential High (RH) Future Land Use classification and MHDR, Medium High DensitY Residential zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. .Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL. of the / following actions and conditions on the request: ' ACTIONS: 1. Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low Classification (RL) (County) to the Residential High (RU) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and 2. Rezonii1g from the A-E, Agricultural Estates (County) to the MHDR,Medium High Density Residential District (City) (pending ANX2004-03004). Attachments: Application Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Land Use Plan Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Site Photographs S:lPlanning DepartmentlC D BlLand Use Amelltv.nentsILUZ 2004lLUZ1004-03002 2025 N Highland Bayshore Broadway, J7IcILUZ2004-03002 Staff Reportdoc Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 7 . . :. From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11 :20 AM To: Parry. Mark Subject: FW: Highland Avenue LOS Corrections , I believe I sent this to you before, but please make sure this is in the file. this in our submission to PPC. " You will need to include -Original Message-- From: Bertels, Paul Sent: Wednesday, May OS, 2004 9:45 AM To: Oayton, Gina CC: 800, Bennett SUbject: Highland Avenue LOS Corrections The section of Highland Avenue between Union Street and Sunset Point Road was listed as LOS F in the 2003 LOS Report published by the MPO. This was due to the fact that the inputs into the computer model for this section omitted the left turn and right turn lanes at Union Street which is the PM Peak Hour Direction. ' , When values were inputted into those fields the corrected LOS came out as LOS C. It is important to note that the sections of Highland Avenue/Patricia Avenue to, , the north also went from an F to a D due to the improvements that are currently underway in Dunedin which involve the widening of Patricia Avenue to 3 lanes from 2 lanes. This should result in this segment of Patricia Avenue from Union Street to S.R. 580 being removed from the constrained corridor list in the next Countywide Concurrency Test Statement. Paul Bertels Manager TraHic Operations Division 727-562-4794 Paul.Berte/s@MyClearwater.com . . ATTACHMENT 4 rite Inut. July1!,2 4. Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater - Theresa Goodman stated that this 4.4-acre parcel is located generally on the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgeland Road The proposed amendment submitted by the City of Clearwater is a request to change the plan designation from Residential Low and WaterlDrainage Feature Overlay to Residential High and WaterlDrainage Feature Overlay. / The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. The subject site is comprised of two single-family homes. Approval of the proposed amendment would allow the site to be developed with homes ata density of up to 30 dwelling units per acre and is proposed for development with 132 town homes. Theresa Goodman presented the case findings and, based on the background data and analysis, it is being recommended that the proposed amendment to Residential High be denied, and in the alternative that the Residential Medium category be. approved, subject to the City limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the city's Concurrency Management System. Gina Clayton advised members that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) report used for traffic analysis by the City contained an error on the level of service grade for this portion of Highland A venue. Ms. Clayton stated that the report identifies this segment of Highland Avenue as being LOS ''F' however, it is LOS ."C", a discrepancy explained by an omission of existing turning lane in .the model. Rick MacAulay asked if this would change the PPC staff recommendation and Theresa Goodman indicated that it would not Ms. Goodman went on to explain that the PPC staff uses Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) tables to evaluate traffic impacts and uses a "daily" LOS. The MPO calculates impacts using a different methodology and peak hours. . . ATIACHMENT 4 r It A d I, 1 Inut 04 , "- ." . Gina Clayton went on to say that the subject site is adjacent to a parcel with a plan designation of Residential High and given that designation .should the property owner desire to redevelop the site to utilize the higher density, they would be able to do so. Discussion ensued regarding density and whether or not other applicable code restrictions might prevent the property from achieving 30 units per acre. Rick MacAulay asked whether or not Ms. Clayton felt that the alternate compromise recommendation to Residential Medium was a "deal breaker" for this subject site. ~. Clayton responded that she was uncertain, as contact with the property owner reveled . only that they wished to move forward with the request to RH. Lastly, Ms. Clayton added that the site orientation which fronts on Highland Avenue and only abuts three single- (amily residences should be given favorable consideration with respect to this request. Gordon Beardslee informed members that he has traveled this corridor often and that the character of the area is single-family in nature. Dean Neal moved approval of the PPC staff recommendatio~ including the supplemental recommendation. The motion was seconded by Gordon Beardslee and approved. (Vote 9-1; Clearwater representative dissenting) . . -Ft I~ fdll0d~. ~Hlt .., Sf/, T: 0 F F LOR I D A DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor THADDEUS L. COHEN, AlA . Secretary . .'------ The Honorable Brian Aungst Mayor, City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 August 20,2004 AUf; 2 4- ,(DOLI Dear Mayor Aungst: The Department has conducted a preliminary review of the City of Clearwater proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment received on July 16,2004, (DCA No. 04-2). The Department has determined that the proposed plan amendment need not be formally reviewed for consistency with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). In addition, the Department has not received any recommendation for review from the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, but has received a comment from Mr. William Co~nelly who objected to the redesignation the 36 acre parcel from Residential Urban to Open Space I Recreation. With this letter, the Department waives its Objections, RecoIi1mendations and Comments Report. The City may proceedto immediately adopt the amendment; however, we recommend that you consider Mr. Connelly's views during your decision making process. For your assistance, we have attached procedures for final adoption and transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment. This letter should be made available for public inspection. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mark Neuse, Planner, or Marina Pennington, Regional Planning Administrator, at (850) 922-1798. ;:T'M~C~ leA Charles Gauthier, AICP tJ Chief of Comprehensive Planning CG/mn cc: Ms. Gina Clayton, City of Clearwater Mr Manny Pumariega, TBRPC Enclosures: Review Agency Comments Letter from Mr. William Connelly 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD $ TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: hllp://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway. Suile 212 Marathon, FL 33050-2227 (305) 289-2402 COMMUNITY PLANNING 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 488-2356 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 413-9969 HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 488-7956 . . , Transmittal Procedures Upon receipt ofthis letter, the City of Clearwater shall have sixty (60) days within which to adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan amendments is outlined in s. 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-l1.011, Florida Administrative Code. The City must ensure that all ordinances adopting comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the provisions of Chapter 163.3189(2)(a), F.S. Within ten (10) working days of the date of adoption, the City of Clearwater must submit the following to the Department: 1. Three copies ofthe adopted comprehensive plan amendment; 2. A copy of the adoption ordinance; 3. A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; 4. A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and, 5. A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the amendment, and pursuant to Rule 9J-l1.011(f) F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted amendment directly to Mr. Manny Pumareiga, Executive Director, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that the Florida legislature amended Section 163 .3184(8)(b), F.S., requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice oflntent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish to the Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information. This list is to be submitted at the time of transmittal ofthe adopted plan amendment Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event no names/addresses are provided, please provide that information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. . . SU:~I~~I~~} bt tD%pt~~~MJ~AJ-H~~~~~1>~~1S~9J6~~~TS June 2002 NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED: Please submit three copies of the adopted amendment package to the Florida Department of Community Affairs and one copy each to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, appropriate Florida Department of Transportation district office, appropriate Regional Planning Council, and the appropriate Water Management District, Office of Educational Facilities of Commissioner of Education (if related to public educational facilities element pursuant to 163.31776, F.S.), appropriate County, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (county plans only), and Florida Department of Agriculture Division of Forestry (county plans only). SUBMITTAL LETTER REQUIREMENTS: Please include the following information in the transmittal cover letter transmitted the adopted amendment (see Rule 9J-11.011 (5), F.A.C.): _ DCA identification number for adopted amendment package; _ Name of newspaper in which the Department will publish the required Notice of Intent (Rule 9J- 11.011(5) F.A.C. and Section 163.3184(15)(e), F.S.); _ Brief description of the adoption package, including any amendments previously proposed but not adopted (Rule 9J-11.011 (5)(a)5, F.A.C.); _ Ordinance number and adoption date (Rule 9J-11.011 (5), F.A.C.); _ Certification that the adopted amendment(s) has been submitted to all parties listed in Rule 9J- 11.009(6), F.A.C. (Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C.); . . ---'-- Name,title. address, telephone. FAX number and e-mail address. of local government contact; _ Letter signed by the chief elected official or the person designated by the local government (Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C.). _ If the plan amendment is unchanged and was not subject to review or objections. a statement requesting expedited publication of notice of intent. The transmittal letter shall include the following language: The comprehensive plan amendment package was adopted without revision from the proposed amendment package and no objections were raised by an affected party, the amendment was not reviewed by the Department or if reviewed no objections were raised. Based upon these facts, we request expedited publication of a Notice of Intent pursuant to Section 163.3184(8), Florida Statutes. ADOPTIONAMENDMENTPACKAGE: Please include the following information in theamendment package (Rule 9J-11.011 (5), F.A.C.): . _ All adopted text, maps and support documents (including data and analysis) on new pages of the affected amendment in a strike-through/underline format (or similar easily identifiable format). In case of future land use map amendment, the adopted future land use map reflecting the changes made when adopted. Note: If the local government is relying on previously submitted data and analysis, no additional data and analysis is required. _ Copy of executed ordinance adopting the comprehensive plan amendment(s); 1 . . _ Copy of the Citizen Courtesy Information List. In event no individuals sign up to receive a courtesy information statement, indicate on sign-in form that no request were made and include the form in the adopted package. [9J-11.015(5)(b)4 and 163.3184(15)(c), F .5.] (Section 163.3184(8)(b)2, F.S.); _ List of additional changes made in the adopted amendment that the Department did not previously review (Rule 9J-11.011 (5)(a)5.a, FAC.); _ List of findings of the local governing body. if any, that were not included in the ordinance and which provided the basis of the adoption or determination not to adopt the proposed amendment (Rule 9J-11.011 (5)(a)5.b. F.A.C.); _ Statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes not previously reviewed by the Department to the ORC report from the Department (Rule 9J-11.011 (5)(a)5.c, F.A.C.) _ List of proposed amendments previously reviewed by the Department in current cycle of amendments that were not adopted by local government (Rule 9J-11.011 (5)(a)5.d. F.A.C.) _ If local government uses replacement page format: copies of newly adopted comprehensive plan pages that contain newly adopted plan amendments and new cumulative table of contents (Rule 9J- 11.011 (5) (e) , (f), F.A.C.). 2 -............................... ,--"', "',-"',"-",, ..-'....."'.' '-'-..-' .-,.-...".<-"C_.,____"__,.., m.w..,-.,,__._..'_'..'...',.,.'.,_...',_.M... n.-,'''..."..o.u_''.'_'_''_, '"w...._..",...'.-..,".-,'.....,,__'.'...." ,.~J[';':""'!,;~~'L'i.'-G'I'!'!"'!4~,!}i.':~i.';H";'''''.~4J"::_;~ Tumpa B..r~' J'(~ql"'JfI&Jl1'1annlnq C(luncll e -- Agenda Item #3.H.l 08/09/04 LOCAL . GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AMENDMENT REPORT q Mf '1t(~lcJLf CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#04-2 PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3184(6)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, IT IS REQUESTED THAT DCA NOT REVIEW THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 . (This page intentionally left blank) For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 e Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28. . . AMENDMENT #LUZ2004-03002 - Future Land Use Map . From: To: Pinellas County Residential Low (RL) Residential High (RH) . . .Size: 4.4 acres . Location: 2025 North Highland Avenue · Existing Use: Two single-family dwellings Proposed Use: 132 townhouse dwellings Adjacent Designations: North: RH South: Residential Urban (RU) East: RH · West: RU · Adjacent Uses: · North: Multi-familyresidential · South: Single-family residential East: Multi-family residential · West: Single-family residential · Regionally Significant: No, based on the fact the proposed amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resources or facilities. · Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No, based on the fact that the proposed amendment does not raise any extra-jurisdictional issues. · Impact regional facilities/resources?: No, based on the fact the proposed amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resources or facilities. · Regional Comments: None. · Applicable SRPP Policies: None. · Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 1 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 051 "'),45 ~ . . , ... -.' ~;R t3f.i I - - -- r.-:rj- - : - -, I ]Z'J - -. . . - . ~~ 02:i -:... , , ,- ...' , , ,- __" 'uJ7--; -. . . . 1__ _l -----1. I ~ ....---. '. qD ;;; ~ I _"r I : .. _I ~~ ::____J I, ~ I _ -r."'"J5~'; I ~- -....... ,_ I : r.:." '-~(,~6 .---. , I !,._. : 2D-h1 --..,.~ r- - ~ -.... , . , : 20~:'1 . - - -, . , , . , ... - f ;_~ _, _:030 .-----, :- - ,: : 2Q24 ~~' , .' " . . : _.7918 , -, ,-'" ... --I '0 ' ~.(:J.l-"'''' .J --~ .. , --I I . , ., . _ _.- -"-; , , t'4 N ~ --'-0') C') , ""'.. 7._-__ -/ - YRAM DR ... -- --I , - -. I L.... _, ,-~- : --....-. I . . Ii , . . , , . I , , l.._____1 , , . . . . . , , I........ ~-----~-~--------------1 ; I -------..._------------~ . , . . .... .. , i- ----- --- RH --, _.. --- , , . ~----------~ :._--------- , I. __, __ ____,...... ___ _..____... _,..._~ r--- . . , . . ' , . ,_...... ~ ........ -. , . , '- --...., <: ::t - G) ::c r- ;b ~ h ~ ,-----...------ ,----_.------ . , , : '- - ... ...... -- ... _. ... ... - '-----...----_..! ,'" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... - ... ... i I , '--------------- " , . . , , . , I... ... . .... -, ,-- I , l,!'" :-... ?~ I.... :-. Future Land Use MaD For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 2 :)) .--~~ L._.. _.2 ~ ~ , I . I ,-- ""'~ Rii--i I.... __'J:": Jgtjdr ~. .' - I . , -.L. ~l'E.~~ Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ex!. 28 ---- . . AMENDMENT #LUZ2004-03003 - Future Land Use Map - From: To: RU Recreation, Op~n Space (RlOS) - - Size: 36.6 acres - Location: 2950 Glen Oak Avenue - Existing Use: Vacant; formerly a mobile home park - Proposed Use: Open space associated with the Kapok Wetland Restoration · Adjacent Designations: North: Preservation (P), Residential Medium and Residential Low (RL) South: P and RlOS East: RL - West: RlOS and Residential Medium - Adjacent Uses: -North: Single- and multi-family residential . South: Eddie C. Moore Recreation Complex East: Single~family residential . West: Cliff Stephens Park and multi-family residential _ Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that the proposed amendment represents an opportunity to both protect an environmentally sensitive water body (Alligator Creek) and provide additional recreation and open space within a highly urbanized setting. _ Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No, based on the fact that the proposed amendment does not -raise any extra-jurisdictional issues. . Impact regional facilities/resources?: No, based on the fact the proposed amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resoutces or facilities. · Regional Comments: None. Applicable SRPP Policies: Natural Resources: 4.5.13, 4.1 0.2,4.10.3,4.1.2,4.11.10, 4.16.1, and 4.16.4. - Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 3 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e e .'\ ; 11J1,....-,~ ...' ..\..~...~ L- ....~1'9'"'}....:- ,. _.....\)V .. .....,. _, - ~."", ,..... -~}- '... (>~' ?''t..:.>';,J.... _ to' () .e'",rl..-\~ ).'-o'i'''_ ".,.J..~\ .,,<,J :.,........, r_ , .;;-:" ... i'"1. ~...... r~ l'.t)........J \ _.. -"-;'J'C It t, ...) {~... II' 'r,J I~ 1,1', I 'u.., .-~ ~ ~ ., v {';;- - ~1 '" ."-,,, .........~ ~- _ ...._~~ ..;.r>'~...~--'" '-1 <3'\.. 1"'" ,......-\1\~I\I't.J .....1', ,,'~ J:..1 ..1 " I" ': \.\.,... .... ,".J.. l~"" \\1 ~ ~\ \ r.Jj.~ f.,"'........ ,"'" ! \ t.>.... (~.....(, ~ "-f.I~ ;'\r~'.,.:-~ '-...' ....o;f"\ -:..' cO' ,," _. I I I ,.. ,.....' 1'i1'1'ni'rTn ~~~.. (,~"~~_.I~)" d -- r ^> ,11\)0.1.' ~\mJ3 ru...cUJJ..I.frr>.T~ . L' .~ -", ,.....'., -~'; ""t r->- / tf.~ 'oY'. ~~ it.~.f.',,,........-..:} r-R; ,1.,....' '.1-- . - ~, -~'. !~mnwnWQmJ;~ I ~rgv ~mI]~ EI f!I lJf(J ~ 0/ ':; I ~ BIDrnm . t1JrJ r:rmDID RlOS H .... .---........-..'1 _l !-.._._,_,,_~ " r r._",.-~ \...-..__"'-..J /_ , ') .:h f ,../' I' , , . I ' "'- ..,: .-....-. _l~.,.; R);t': -,. ..!'..".... '\ ,jO...... "'<.' " ......' , r-). ..' \ m .......... ,-'w } .......~I ,.. ,,'" ..., , ' RIDS RlOS Future Land Use Map For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 4 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 . . AMENDMENT #CP A2004-04001 - Future Land Use Element · General Description: In 2001, the City amended its Comprehensive Plan to reflect the provisions of Beach byDesign: A Preliminary Design for Cleanvater Beach. Ope of the incentives included was the establishment of a pool of 600 additional hotel rooms to be available for use in three designated areas of Clearwater Beach. One of the sites, the 6.2 acre Yacht Basin, is presently being developed for a townhouse/condominium. As a result, the City proposes to identify a new 4.6 acre site located between Mandalay Avenue and the Gulf of Mexico to replace the Yacht Basin site. This transfer would be accomplish by an amendment to Policy 2.1.4 of the Future Land Use Element. According to the City, the new site "is well suited for the density pool due to its proximity to the dry sand beach, its location adjacent to an area already available for the pool, assembly opportunities, and serious developer interest." Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that Clearwater Beach is located entirely within the Coastal High Hazard Area and the amendment continues to support redevelopment activities within an area recognized as important to the region's tourism industry . . Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No, since all immediate impacts would be confined to the city of Clearwater. · Impact regional facilities/resources?: Yes, based on the mitigation of any potential development impacts on SR 60 which serves as the evacuation route from Clearwater Beach. Regional Comments: None. · Applicable SRPP Policies: Economic Development: 2.3.1 Emergency Preparedness: 3.2.3 · Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 5 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 . . , 3 i Area proposed to " be eligible for :1 1 Resort Pool. Area eligible for Resort Pool. (No change proposed) Area eligible for Resort Pool to be eliminated. ~~ .~ ~~~~~r.: I ! --1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Mop For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 6 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext 28 . . ~ ~ -=-"0 Florida Department of Transportation ,/F:B BUSH GO\'ER.'iOR 11201 N. McKinley Drive. Tampa, FL 33612-60:56. Phone (813) 975-6000 . 1-800-226.7220 July 23, 2004 ~D :JUC II n \l7 Ii r!i'~ 7... f"Cl ~ 5 2004 Ii "Iii ' .. . J l . ; ! ~-I' . - . ~ i .f RP,.,A "So ---~-J I' i J.lL' f" P' ~'b , ~,o.:.~ Ii v tfO"'':')<::/,\ir. 'C-." '.... / ---~":<~~L . ? -~.~ 1 rJ\ l ~ ? v' ( tv( Mr. Charles Gauthier, AlCP Chief, Bureau of Comprehensive Planning Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: City of Clearwa.ter Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 04.:.2 Dear Mr. Gauthier: The Department has reviewed the proposed Clearwater comprehensive plan Amendment 04-2 in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the Department's Review Guidelines for Local Government Comprehensive Plans. We do not object to any of the proposed changes (including LUZ2004-03002; LUZ2004-03003; and LUZ2004-04001) and we do not anticipate that they will adversely impact the Florida Intrastate Highway System and/or the Florida Transportation System. Should the application vary upon a future re-submittal, we would request the opportunity to review it. The Departmentappteciates the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed Amendment. If you have any questions, please call me at SunCom 512-780 1, or (813) 975-6444. Sincerely, ~ {!A. ~/ Carol M. Collins LGCP and CMS Coordinator cc: Bob Romig, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT Cynthia Tarapani, AlCP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater www.dot.state.fl.us .lost .-\BREl' SF:CRF:T-\RY o RFr:Vr.1 ~n P~PFR . . Department of Environmental Protection Jeb Bush Governor Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399~3000 August 9,2004 Colleen M. Castille Secretary q )V\-V Mr. D. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and DRl Processing Team Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 ~\\()iu~ RE: Clearwater 04-2, Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Office ofIntergovernmental Programs has reviewed the proposed amendment under the procedures of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 9J-5 and 9J-ll,Florida Administrative Code, and we do not have any comments based on the information provided. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If I may be of further assistance, please call me at (850) 245-2169. Sincerely, SPiD Sarah E. Daugherty Environmental Specialist Office of Intergovernmental Programs /sed "More Protection, Less Process" An Equal Opportun;ty Employer Watson L. Haynes II Chair, Pinellas Heidi B. McCree Vice Chair, Hillsborough Judith C. Whitehead Secretary, Hernando Talmadge G. . Jerry" Rice Treasurer, Pasco Edward W. Chance Manatee Thomas G. Dabney Sarasota Maggie N. Dominguez Hillsborough Ronnie E. Duncan Pine lias Ronald C. Johnson Polk Janet D. Kovach Hillsborough Patsy C. Symons DeSoto David L. Moore Executive Director Gene A. Heath Assistant Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel South~st Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad S.t. Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1.-800-423-1.476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TOO only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Bartow Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Lecanto Service Office 3600 West Sovereign Path Suite 226 Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 667-3271 Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 August 4,2004 ~ !'^~ t\q\~ u 20rv .J 1....).- ., :j .-''-;'.-~ .,;,.....} D. Ray Eubanks Bureau of State Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 . ~ -. ; ~.-_._-.:.. Subject: Clearwater Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment DCA Reference # 04-2 Dear Mr. Eubanks: In accordance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, the staff of the Southwest Florida Water Management District has reviewed the above- referenced plan amendment and has no comments at this time. The District appreciates the opportunity to participate in the review of comprehensive plan amendments. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me in the District's Planning Department at extension 4423. . .y ',\,\Y FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ST ATE Glenda E. Hood Secretaryof State DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr. Ray Eubanks Department of Community Affairs Bureau of State Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 t flF ~I~(O~ ;1 r-~""'~--~'--- :/' ~., R G, -.-.... '. i F ~ Jf;: rc n IV? i~ ;=0;,. 1'1 Ii r"~~'~~ U \!J L5 1..1 ! ..; --"/'/'1 J ,_. I ! I i,lf Ii." , I' '(!'.' i,/j;U\ i1/"I'.! J ,I.,i~,~ i ~vna - c 3XJ4 i i .J ,; I I 0 ,I !' . ." jL~~.~._.__ .' '-.~ : . .:, PP"'l B^P-'--~- !~oc;;~:;~ :?1~lJ:i~ct~~i'~19_ITdfl July 28, 2004 Re: Historic Preservation Review of the Clearwater (04-2) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request Dear Mr. Eubanks: According to this agency's responsibilities under sections 163.3177 and 163.3178, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, we reviewed the above document to determine if data regarding historic resources have been given sufficient Gonsideration in the request to amend the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. . We reviewed two proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Map, in addition to a text amendment, to consider the potential effects of these actions on historic resources. While our cursory review suggests that the proposed changes may have no adverse effects on historic resources, it is the city's responsibility to ensure that the proposed revisions will not have an adverse effect on significant archaeological or historic resources in the City of Clearwater. For the Kapok Wetland Restoration Plan Amendment, LUZ2004-03003, there are three recorded archaeological sites adjacent to this parcel; thereby making this location a high probability area for encountering additional archaeological resources. The most effective way to guarantee that such sites are not adversely affected is for the city to sponsor or require historic resource surveys so that it can ensure its archaeological resources and historic structures more than 50 years old will be considered when substantive changes in land use are proposed. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact Susan M. Harp of the Division's Compliance Review staff at (850) 245..6333. Sincerely, ~ C!. ffL~ ~~~ ~ Frederick Gaske, Director 500 S. Bronough Street . Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 · http://www.tlheritage.com o Director's Office (850) 245-6300. FAX: 245-6435 o Archaeological Research (850) 245-6444 . FAX: 245-6436 o Historic Preservation (850) 245-6333 . FAX: 245-6437 o Historical Museums (850) 245-6400. FAX: 245-6433 o Palm Beach Regional Office (561) 279-1475. FAX: 279-1476 o St. Augustine Regional Office 0 Tampa Regional Office (904) 825-5045. FAX: 825-5044 (813) 272-3843. FAX: 272-2340 . . Mr. Thaddeus Cohen, Secretary Department of Community Affairs State of Florida 2555 Shumand Oak Boulevard Tallahasse, Florida 32399-2100 Dear Secretary Cohen, I am writing ~n reference to a City of Clearwater, Department of Public Works project entitled KAPOK WETLANDS AND FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION PROJECT (Clearwater LUZ 2004-03003) which is currently being reviewed by the Departmentof Community Affairs for approval of the revisions made to the original Project Plan. This letter is to inform you that the residents of my community have expressed deep concerns regarding the adverse affect the addition of an unsecured and unmonitored Parking Lot in the Northeast corner of this .project site will have on our densely populated residential tract. This project replaces a Mobile Home Trailer Park that never should have been built on this 37 acre site in the first place. In the original plan, there was no provision for a Parking Lot, and the Northeast corner was not the primary public entry for the park. The parking facility was added to comply with the requirements of Grant received by the City of Clearwater. Its location in the northeast corner is the easiest way to provide this access. While we do not object to a Parking Lot as part bf this project, its location is the matter of serious c6ticern to us. W~ believe th~t it was placed in this location primarily because it would not create any traffic problems for City of Clearwater residents. Traffic would be routed through Pinellas County streets. The Site Plan, as currently drawn, will require visitors to this park to travel more than one half mile through the narrow streets of our densely populated community. Our streets were never designed to support this type of traffic, and there are currently no sidewalk access for the residents. The lack of sidewalks has not been a problem in the past because there a is minimal traffic flow. There is no park in the ~ity of Cle~rwater, or throughout Pinellas County that requires the public to drive one half mile into the heart of a residential community for access. Additional traffic, activity, pose an increased danger to the elderly. especially outside drivers traveling to a recreational our most vulnerable community residents the young and The children of this community utilize these streets for recreational activities - to roller skate, ride their bikes, skateboard and play ball. They are currently safe, and within the eyesight and hearing of their parents. . . Our community is also the home of many Senior Citizens whose physical agility and varied handicaps make them suseptible to injury as they try to dodge the additional traffic. We are also concerned about illegal activity in this parking lot by drug dealers and other criminals who will use this unsecured and unmonitored lot, open 24/7, as a new haven for their illegal transactions. This availability will not only draw park visitors during the daylight hours, but also a criminal element after dark that will create serious safety and security concerns for many of our residents. We have expressed these concerns to the City of Clearwater, and their responses have demonstrated an insensitive disregard for the safety of our residential community. In a letter addressed to the City Council dated 6/5/04, a member of our community expressed our concerns. This letter was discussed at the Council Work Session on 6/15/04. That session was televised locally, and representatives of the Planning Department and the Engineering Department provided inappropriate and somewhat inane responses to the matters outlined by the community. The letter expressed concerns about additional traffic and the lack of sidewalks and the narrow streets. The Planning Department responded that this was not a matter of concern for the.City Council because the individuals involved were not residents of the City of Clearwater. She insisted that this concern should be addressed by Pinellas County, and not the City. I guess she missed the point that the City of Clearwater was planning to invade our neighborhood, not Pinellas County. The letter expressed concerns about addition of the unmonitored Parking Lot, and the City Engineer responded that this should not be a concern because the lot would be unpaved. Gee, doesn't that make us feel a whole lot safer. The letter proposed two alternative sites for the Parking Lot, and the response was that both sites were too far a walk from the heart of the Park. Both sites we proposed are in non-residential areas and adequate parking currently exist at both sites. One on the southern edge of the project, the other in the northwest corner of the project. How the distance became a factor is beyond me. This is, after all, a "walk through experience" with trails and paved pathways. The letter also addressed the lack of information that has been forthcoming from the City of Clearwater regarding this project, and the response from the City Manager was that there were several newspaper articles which he believes is sufficient. The fact that the newspaper articles did not include specifics seems to evade this high paid City Official. Not to mention the obligation the City has to keep "affected residents" informed. (Affected residents does not mean City residents . . ONLY. ) There are 133 homeowners in our community. In a petition to remove this Parking Lot as currently planned, we were able to obtain 118 signatures from individual homeowners. Those who were not available to sign the petition (15) are non-resident owners. We presented this petition to the City Council on June 17, 2004, and it should now be a part of the Official Record. At the City Council meeting, 10 members of our coromunity spoke against the Parking Lot. We again expressed our concerns and the responses from the City Staff were basically the same, and just as ridiculous. The City Planning Department stated, this project went unchallenged at the Community Development Board, who approved the plan unanimously." While this may be technically correct, it is a little misleading. At the outset of the May 18, 2004 Community Development Board, the chairman indicated that this project would be moved to the Consent Agenda, and the matter was never brought up for discussion. When he had asked at that time whether there was anyone who was planning to speak on it, two residents of our community raised their hands, but the matter was still moved to the Consent Agenda. At the City Council Meeting, one of our speakers addressed the fact that the construction vehicles would utilize our streets as a means of ingress and egress during the 12 month construction period. Once again the Council was given bad information. The City Engineer told the Council that the vehicles would enter once, and remain on site during the entire construction project. He backtracked at bit in St. Petersburg Times article on 7/5/05, where he is quoted as saying, "If the construction vehicles tear up the street, they will have to repair them..." What happened to keeping the vehicles on site? The City Engineer also stated at the City Council Meeting that he has considered the alternative suggestions for the Parking Lot and determined that if the lot had to be built at th~ Northwest (alteinate site l)corner of the site, "...1 would have to build 1200 feet of roadway to accommodate the lot." I guess the lives and safety of Pinel1as County residents are worth less than 1200 feet of roadway. What is more frightening about this project is that the decision making process is limited to a very few people. The City Planning Department and Engineering Department are not required to get an approval of the Site Plan because there are no buildings included as part of this project, and the total cost of the project doesn't require an additional approval process. Those City employees who have adamantly refused to work with this community and have consistently provided misleading information will have the final approval of the Site Plan and where the parking lot will be located. . . ~2~ll! ~-Jv~,~~~_____~=~=~=_===~~=-=~~~_=~____=n Ij_'~ -"e' --..--....... +.- _~~.____.___.___.___...-.-.-n -..-.- un '--'-'.'--- ..__..._.u_.__....... - II ~ !:' .' i.-, ' .... -rJ;;j- " -- · . ill ,CffiJ..-n_~rnl1 ~...,.. ijfiv.e . -~ UL ~~ w ----._---=-=(~V~~= --~rJ1----rt--u-n-----J)1)----~--B~.v\ . . .. .. .QfIV ~ ' I '----.] . . " __==~ .t3Qjs-tQi.eJ\~---~1o _~=~:=-~=' __ , C l([ .. ----~.(j--.----'--.--n I~' ~((\~,\ {\dJV~ ~_..., =--=- I" JwLll~~~=_~ ._:1e~?~~.- ... . _~~'._ , . . I~--;:;:- "-- 1;---_-f0_~.LA :Qi01tl_n-r\ ,,_~_,____ __ ---.----. ..~---~- ----.._--~-~._-----_.._-_.~ .-~- .---- -- - ._....._--------------_.~--_.--_._----, .------_.--_.- -"- _.._'_.._-----~_._--~_._---,...,-- ---- --.--,---",-,.----.- --, -~'-- - -~-~~--, -~-----.-~---~----.-- -- - -- . _n _...__ __'__'n .- --.--,-..________._____~__.___ _____~._____.____ ._..________..__ _ ..____""._._ .._____ ___ __..__n -______.___..__'"___,_...._____._....____M I ~._'_...-.._~--~--~ ----.------""'-------.--.-- _.--, -.-------.- -~---_._.,--------- ----.--.--.-----.--.------.--.., .------_..,._._._~ .----,~.._-<---~._---,- ~------.... --.--. .-- . .._.__~_._~__ ______ . n__ _______~. _~.~___.__,_.~_______.,~.....______...______ ____._..~______" .__.__.__._.,.. ___'__ .. ---- --- -. -----------_._,._---~ ----.- J I il - -...-.-~----.-~--------- ----.-.-----------~_ - _-- ....._._...__"__".__ _________.,____.___'_,.~__u,,__ .."__________._ '_'", _ .__ _.~~-_._~-~---~---- -----------------~--~----_._-----~-~--~_.__.~-.._-_._-_.. ---~---~.. '. --_._----_..~- .------------------------ --._- '-'-_.-.--------~_. .__._---_.~--~.- ----. --- -~..--.--,-- '-,' .____._..____u__ __ ____..____~____________.,___ ____._____.___~___.______n.. ___, .___. __._____~____.~_~_,__ _._. -'--'~~------- .--.--..----".--- ---- -.---- -- - --------,--------.-----------------....-- ----.-_._..~-----'>-_._-~-------_._------.~.~'._._-----,---. --------~. -~-,~~._._.---,~-...-.--------.-.----- --.- -'---.-----------.-.-------~_____~______...,-__"r__"__~_.~__..._'_._____._.._'"_....__ , . ._".. __.,'__,"_"_._ ____..._ _____. ~.._____ '_'._ 1 !' '~-i . .'_'''',"''r'~_'''_' .--,,------ .--- ..,.- ---.--... '--~-,,----.~'.'....._---.--- ,. . . 221 Turner Street Clearwater, Florida 727-449-1476 ^ BAYSHORE DROA D\N A Y .,> l;) t- '.' t. t n j; f, ~ ~ ! August 31, 2004 Via email MaYorA~ Re: Case 3 earwater Plan Amendment) 20. enue Dear Mayor Aungst: First and foremost I wish you the best of luck with the upcoming election. As a long time Clearwater resident and supporter of your campaign for Clerk I look forward to your successful tenure as Clerk. I also want to thank you for returning my call last week and I felt that it might be easier for you to consider a written account of our situation versus a long phone call. My company is under contract to purchase 4.4 acres on N. Highland Avenue. The referenced case recently received zoning approval for 30 units to the acre by you and the City Commission and annexation was completed at the same time. Our case for the Land Use Amendment was to be heard by the Pinellas County Commission on August 26 but it was continued because the PPC had recommended denial. Staff had suggested that 15 units per acre was more to their liking. A discussion ensued at the hearing that suggested that 21 to 23 units to the acre might be acceptable if we could find a way to limit the density. A Development Agreement ("DA") was suggested and we pursued this with City staff. Unfortunately the DA process requires a fully designed site plan and another 6 months of review time before we could go back to the County. Besides the fact that doing a site plan before having zoning and land use approval is contrary to the normal process, we do not have enough time with our Seller to get the approvals we require to achieve a closing. Last week we met with the Assistant County Attorney, Jim Bennett, Brian Smith, the County's Planning Director, and they both appear to be supportive of21-23 units per acre and a Deed (covenant) restriction that would restrict the density to such a number1. 1 Our planning experts have designed a Traditional Neighborhood Design ('TND") concept that would result in 90 town home units. The plan calls for gabled roof lines and front porches to face Highland (on about 1/3 of the units) and creates alley ways for rear entrance parking on all units. In this neighborhood the 90 units are essential in order to keep the [mished product in a price range that will be affordable to local residents. , . . 221 Turner Street Clearwater, Florida 727-449-1476 Under this approach, the county could approve the 30 unit application subject to the restriction and the City and the County should be satisfied. However, our first discussions with City staff have led us to believe that City staff is hesitant to accept a covenant restriction. Considering that the City Commission has already approved the project at 30 units per acre it would seem reasonable to expect that the City would be willing to assist us in our efforts to get County approvals subject to the 21 unit per acre restriction. While City staff did an excellent job of presenting the case to the PPC, we have not gotten an agreement to the idea of using a Covenant Restriction but instead have been told that a DA is required. Our contractual time constraints make this course impossible. My attorney has arranged a meeting with the City Attorney, Pam Akin, to discuss the use of the Covenant Restriction to limit density in lieu of using the DA. Ms. Akin's assistant had previously rejected this concept but we are hopeful that, with the County's support (and your support), Ms. Akin will see the wisdom of this concept. The reason for my letter is to ask if you could reinforce with Ms. Akin the fact that the Commission voted 7-0 in favor of the 30 units per acre and request that she consider the covenant restriction method of achieving our land use change in the most favorable light. What we are asking is not precedent setting. Weare due to be heard again October 5th and, in the remaining time we need to get the City staff and the County staff to agree on a means to limit density to 21 units per acre. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at 727-449-1476. Thank you, Geoffrey C. Weber BayshorelBroadway, Inc. tit B l -, PINELLAS .. PLANNING -'--' COUNCIL \ B\L, e N,~Ale... Gw- 6,w, ~- ---..--~ COUNCIL MEMBERS July 23,2004 -) ,F i Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman Commissioner Calvin D. Harris, Ed. D., Vice-Chairman Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Councilmember Bill Foster, Secretary Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris Councilmember Sandra L. Bradbury Mayor Tom De Cesare Mayor Robert H. DiNicola School Board Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth Commissioner Nadine S. Nickeson 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 · Clearwater, Florida 33755-4160 Telephone 727.464.8250 · Fax 727.464.8212 · www.co.pinellas.fl.us/ppc Mayor Brian Aungst City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756-4748 j i) l ". \J David P. Healey, AICP, Executive Director Dear Mayor Aungst: The Pinellas Planning Council considered at public hearing on July 21, 2004 two applications from the City of Clearwater for amendment of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan. The Council recommended denial without prejudice of Case CW 04-35 and approval of Case CW 04-36, as noted on page 1 of the accompanying agenda memoranda. These amendments will be considered, including the recommendations of the PPC, by the Board of County Commissioners, in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA), on August 10, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. Under separate cover, the City has been notified of its right to apply for Administrative Hearing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of denial as set forth in the attached copy of the Rules outlining the Administrative Hearing process pursuant to Section 5.1.3 of the Countywide Rules. Thank you and your staff for your assistance planning process. in ~eee.WE.9 conntywide fl,llG \);j lU~~ PLANN\Nr::GCOLEEPA~~i~~T crN Or ." Sincerely, /ld4(~ Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph. D., Chairman Pinellas Planning Council Attachment: Case Report cc: Councilmember Hoyt Hamilton, Pinellas Planning Council Representative William Home, City Manager ~di Tarpani, Planning Director y~ PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMtv1UNITY '... /' e e '\ PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM ..... I AGENDA ITEM: IV B-9. I I MEETING DATE: July 21,2004 I . SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map From:' Residential Low - RL To: Residential High - RH Area: 4.4 acres < CASE #: CW 04-35 JURISDICTION: City of Clearwater (LUZ 2004-03002) LOCATION: On the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. TYPE: Regular Map Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based On Accompanying Findings (1. A. & B. [ 1-6]), Recommend That the Proposed Amendment to Residential High be Denied, and in the Alternative that the Residential Medium Category be Approved, Subiect to the CityLimiting Traffic Impacts Pursuant to the CitY's Concurrency Management System. L FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following fmdings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. B. A summarized evaluation of the impact of the amendment on the SIX Relevant Countywide Considerations is as follows: PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council recommended denial without preiudice of the change from Residential Low to Residential High. (Vote 9-2; City of Clearwater and Group C representatives dissenting) I COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITYACTION: I 1 F:\USERS\ WPDOCSILU\CASES\04 cases'July\Reports\CW04- 35r.clw.doc . ~ . Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH GOVERNOR 11201 N. McKinley Drive' Tampa, FL 33612.6456 . Phone (813) 975.6000 . 1.800.226.7220 JOSE ABREU SECRETARY July 23, 2004 Mr. Charles Gauthier, AICP Chief, Bureau of Comprehensive Planning Division of Community Planning Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak: Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 RE: City of Clearwater Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 04-2 Dear Mr. Gauthier: The Department has reviewed the proposed Clearwater comprehensive plan Amendment 04-2 in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the Department's Review Guidelines for Local Government Comprehensive Plans. We do not object to any of the proposed changes (including LUZ2004-03002; LUZ2004-03003; and LUZ2004-04001) and we do not anticipate that they will adversely impact the Florida Intrastate Highway System and! or the Florida Transportation System. Should the application vary upon a future re-submittal, we would request the opportunity to review it. The Department appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed Amendment. If you have any questions, please call me at SunCom 512-7801, or (813) 975-6444. Sincerely, ~ ttJ. ~ Carol M. Collins LGCP and CMS Coordinator cc: Bob Romig, Director of Policy Planning, FDOT Cynthia Tarapani, AICP, Director of Planning, City of Clearwater www.dot.state.fl.us @ RECYCLED PAPER . COUNCl L MEMBERS William Home, City Manager City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RECEiVED Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman Commissioner Calvin D. Harris, Ed. D., Vice-Chairman Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Council member Bill Foster, Secretary Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris Councilmember Sandra L. Bradbury Mayor Tom De Cesare Mayor Robert H. DiNicola School Board Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth Commissioner Nadine S. Nickeson 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 · Clearwater, Florida 33755-4160 Telephone 727.464.8250 · Fax 727.464.8212 · www.co.pinellas.fl.us/ppc July 23, 2004 JuL (' ~~ IUI\~ David P. Healey, AICP, Executive Director Re: Case CW 04-35 KZ If Dear My-orne: C :'; V GF CL~:A:;(t":.<L~.:~ A copy of the Council's recommendation from its July 21, 2004 meeting on this amendment is enclosed for your information and records. The Council recommended that the proposed amendment to Residential High be denied without prejudice, as noted on page 1 of the accompanying agenda memorandum. ~LANNING DEp.:.r~TMENT This is to notify you, pursuant to Section 5.1.3 of the Countywide Rules, of the City's right to apply for Administrative Hearing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of denial as set forth in the attached copy of the Rules outlining the Administrative Hearing process. Absent an application for appeal, the recommendation of the Pinellas Planning Council is scheduled to be considered by the Countywide Planning Authority on August 10, 2004. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ~.'H~ Executive Director cc: Councilmember Hoyt Hamilton, Pinellas Planning Council Representative Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY . COUNCIL MEMBERS Leonard Chetkin Mary Chetkin 70 1 Washington Street Key West, FL 33040 Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman Commissioner Calvin D. Harris, Ed. D., Vice-Chairman Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Councilmember Bill Foster,Secretan' Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris Council member Sandra L. Bradbury Mayor Tom De Cesare Mayor Robert H. DiNicola School Board Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth Commissioner Nadine S. Nickeson 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 · Clearwater, Florida 33755-4160 Telephone 727.464.8250 · Fax 727.464.8212 · www.co.pinellas.fl.us/ppc July 23, 2004 David P. Healey, AICP, Executive Director Re: Case CW 04-35 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Chetkin: A copy of the Council's recommendation from its July 21, 2004 meeting on this amendment is enclosed for your information and records. The Council recommended that the proposed amendment to Residential High be denied without prejudice, as noted on page 1 of the accompanying agenda memorandum. This is to notify you, pursuant to Section 5.1.3 of the Countywide Rules, of your right to apply for Administrative Hearing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of denial as set forth in the attached copy of the Rules outlining the Administrative Hearing process. This is to notify you that, pursuant to County Ordinance No. 96-23 establishing procedures for public hearing, the recommendation of the Pinellas Planning Council to be considered by the Countywide Planning Authority on August 10, 2004, in the above referenced matter is available for your inspection. If you have' any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ~A~ David P. Healey, AICP Executive Director cc: Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director City of Clearwater PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY '! ,~ . Be f ~ ~~~~~6 . ;~ -'--....t COUNCIL . COUNCIL MEMBERS Dear Mayor Aungst: Mavor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman Commissioner Calvin D. Harris, Ed.D., Vice-Chairman Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Councilmember Bill Foster, Secretary Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris R ," Councilmember Sandra L. Bradbury E" p"_ . Mayor Tom De Cesare ~- ';. ",,' \ 'EI) Mayor Robert H. DiNicola '- "-._ V J S hool ~oard Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth JUL " Commissioner Nadine S. Nickeson ,;:92fJ'O' . . , ,~ David P. Healey, AICP, ExecutIVe Director ~~!'IN/NG DCn,. "'Ji t. .', \' ()F, -i ",i'~ MEN v CI:..El,:r;Hf'........ ; t.. \.'~ ~.,. .~_ f ~~.' _:::~ 600 Cleveland Street, Su ite 850 . Clearwater, Florida 33755-41 60 Telephone 727.464.8250 . Fax 727.464.8212 . www.co.pinellas.fl.us/ppc July 23,2004 Mayor Brian Aungst City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater FL 33756-4748 , The Pinellas Planning Council considered at public hearing on July 21, 2004 two applications from the City of Clearwater for amendment of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan. The Council recommended denial without prejudice of Case CW 04-35 and approval of Case CW 04-36, as noted on page 1 of the accompanying agenda memoranda. These amendments will be considered, including the recommendations of the PPC, by the Board of County Commissioners, in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA), on August 10,2004 at 9:30 a.m. Under separate cover, the City has been notified of its right to apply for Administrative Hearing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of denial as set forth in the attached copy of the Rules outlining the Administrative Hearing process pursuant to Section 5.1.3 of the Countywide Rules. Thank you and your staff for your assistance in the coordination of our countywide planning process. Sincerely, (~d4(J.J-- Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph. D., Chairman Pinellas Planning Council Attachment: Case Report cc: Councilmember Hoyt Hamilton, Pinellas Planning Council Representative William Home, City Manager Cyndi Tarpani, Planning Director PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY ~ /" . . " .. PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM '- ...... I AGENDA ITEM: IVB-9. I I MEETING DATE: July 21,2004 I SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map From:. Residential Low - RL To: Residential High - RH Area: 4.4 acres CASE #: CW 04-35 JURISDICTION: City of Clearwater (LUZ 2004-03002) LOCATION: On the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. TYPE: Regular Map Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based On Accompanying Findings (1. A. & B. [ 1-6]), Recommend That the Proposed Amendment to Residential High be Denied. and in the Alternative that the Residential Medium Category be Approved. Subiect to the City. Limiting Traffic Impacts Pursuant to the City's Concurrency Management System. L FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following fmdings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the - subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. B. A summarized evaluation of the impact of the amendment on the SIX Relevant Countywide Considerations is as follows: PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council recommended denial without preiudice of the change from Residential Low to Residential High. (Vote 9-2; City of Clearwater and Group C representatives dissenting) [ COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITYACTION: I 1 F:IUSERSI \VPDOCSILUlCASESI04 cases'JulylReportsICW04-35r.c1w.doc .. / . . " PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM '\.. ...oiIl I AGENDA ITEM: IV B-3. I I MEETING DATE: July 21,2004 I SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map From: Residential Urban - RU To: Recreation/Open Space - R/OS Area: 36.6 acres CASE #: CW 04-36 JURISDICTION: City of Clearwater (LUZ2004-03003) LOCATION: At the western terminus of Glen Oak A venue North, approximately 1,250 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. TYPE: Level I-Type E Subthreshold Map Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based on Accompanying Findings (LA & B), Recommend to the Countywide Planning Authority That The Proposed Level I Subthreshold Amendment to Recreation/Open Space Be Approved Pursuant to the Official Acceptance Process. L FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following findings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with Division 5.3, Section 5.3.4 of the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan (Countywide Rules), the purpose of which is to recognize and provide for Level 1 subthreshold amendments of the Countywide Plan Map. PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council recommended approval of the amendment from Residential Urban to Recreation/Open Space. (Vote 11-0) I COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: I 1 F :IUSERS,WPDOCS>LU'CASESI04 casesIJulylRcportslCW04- 36.c1w.doc . COUNCI~ MEMBERS 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 · Clearwater, Florida 33755-4160 Telephone 727.464.8250 · Fax 727.464.8212 · www.co.pinellas.fl.us/ppc JUL ~ 9 iUQ4 Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman Commissioner Calvin D. Harris, Ed. D., Vice-Chairman Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Councilmember Bill Foster, Secretary Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris Councilmember Sandra L. Bradbury Mayor Tom De Cesare Mayor Robert H. DiNicola School Board Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth Commissioner Nadine S. Nickeson REC:_:iVED July 23, 2004 City of Clearwater PO Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 "'JLANNING D~?{'.?TMENT (---":;,.'.~~{ elF C~,.,[,,!\~ r","'.'T:l~'~,}t David P. Healey, AICP, Executive Director Re: Case CW 04-36 To whom this may concern: A copy of the Council's recommendation from its July 21, 2004 meeting to approve the amendment is enclosed for your information and records. This is to notify you that, pursuant to County Ordinance No. 96-23 establishing procedures for public hearing, the recommendation of the Pinellas Planning Council to be considered by the Countywide Planning Authority on August 10, 2004, in the above referenced matter is available for your inspection. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ~A4 David P. Healey, AICP Executive Director cc: Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director City of Clearwater PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY . COUNCI ~ MEMBERS 600 Cleveland Street, Su ite 850 · Clearwater, Florida 33755-4160 Telephone 727.464.8250 · Fax 727.464.8212 · www.co.pinellasJl.us/ppc JUI G ~ Jfjn4 _ t" ;." ,,-.. Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman Commissioner Calvin D. Harris, Ed. D., Vice-Chairman Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Councilmember Bill Foster, Secretary Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris Councilmember Sandra L. Bradbury Mayor Tom De Cesare Mayor Robert H. DiNicola School Board Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth Commissioner Nadine 5. Nickeson REr~-:~.VED ,~. ~_..f.-s I July 23, 2004 Ms. Terry Finch 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 '")LANNING D=Kt'5:;TMENT r-':':;":,"\' 0:'= ,,~ r:.": ;:,"';~~ "~:-i.:'- ;':....~,") . -, .......:1 '.....i'''''~_,.,? L" ~.,' I.. : ~ \.-~~:,r\. David P. Healey, AICp, Executive Director Re: Case CW 04-36 Dear Ms. Finch: A copy of the Council's recommendation from its July 21, 2004 meeting to approve the amendment is enclosed for your information and records. This is to notify you that, pursuant to County Ordinance No. 96-23 establishing procedures for public hearing, the recommendation of the Pinellas Planning Council to be considered by the Countywide Planning Authority on August 10, 2004, in the above referenced matter is available for your inspection. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ~A4 David P. Healey, AICP Executive Director cc: Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director City of Clearwater PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY , Elf""'" PIN E ~AS .. PLANNING ~ COUNCIL RE~iVED ,IUI_ r'~ iii1jU ':)1 ^1\11\1I1\1~ nl::::Jr .~'-IUt::"IT ':;~--\' .~;= C~_-,~?t" '. I AGENDA ACTION SHEET RESULTS OF THE MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, JULY 21,2004 I. CALL TO ORDER - At 9:00 A.M. bv Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman A. Invocation and Pledge - Led by Councilmember Pete Bengston B. Identification of Members Present - Acknowledgement of Members in Attendance II. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of June 16, 2004 Meeting - Approved B. Financial Statement for June 2004 - Approved III. REPORTS AND OTHER ACTION A. Countywide Planning Authority Actions - July - Received B. Annexation Report - June and Quarterly Summary - Received C. Ability to Serve Report No. 04-3: City of St. Petersburg - Approved a rmding that the City of St. Petersburg has the ability to provide municipal services and authorized finding to be transmitted to the City D. Local Assistance Quarterly Status Report - Received E. Annual Plan Map Adjustments - Official Acceptance - Recommended Approval F. Minor Plan Change (No. 04-1): City of Clearwater- Recommended Approval G. PPC Newsletter - Preliminary Draft - Approved printing and distribution with noted revisions IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public Hearing Format Announcement and Oath B. Proposed Amendments to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Group 1: Subthreshold Amendments 1. Case CW 04-31: City of St. Petersburg - Recommended approval from Residential Medium to Residential/Office/Retail 2. Case CW 04-32: City of St. Petersburg - Recommended approval from Industrial General to Industrial Limited 3. Case CW 04-36: City of Clearwater - Recommended approval from Residential Urban, Preservation, and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay to Recreation/Open Space, Preservation, and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay 4. Case CW 04-38: Pinellas County - Recommended approval from Commercial General to Residential Low F:\USERS\WPDOCS\PPC Mtg Items\REGITEMS\AGENDAS\ACTION SHEET Jul 04.doc . . \ IV. PUBLIC HEARING (Continued Group 2: Regular Amendments 5. Case CW 04-29: City of St. Petersburg- Recommended approval from Preservation, Industrial Limited, Activity Center/Primary Overlay, and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay to Industrial Limited, Activity Center/Primary Overlay, and WaterlDrainage Feature Overlay 6. Case CW 04-30: City of St. Petersburg - Recommended approval from Commercial General and Activity Center/Primary Overlay to Central Business District and Activity Center/Primary Overlay, subiect to the condition that the City submit. within five years of the date of approval of this amendment monitoring and evaluation report for the Intown Central Business District and with a supplemental recommendation that the City consider initiating an amendment to Central Business District for those parcels within the Intown AreawideBRI -that are-designated Commercial General and Residential/Office/Retail. 7. Case CW 04-33: City of Pinellas Park - Recommended approval from Institutional and Commercial General to Residential Medium 8. Case CW 04-34: City of Pinellas Park - Recommended approval from Commercial General to Residential/Office/Retail 9. Case CW 04-35: City of Clearwater - Recommended denial without preiudice of the change from Residential Low and WaterlDrainage Feature Overlay to Residential High and WaterlDrainage Feature Overlay 10. Case CW 04-37: Pinellas County - Recommended approval from Commercial Recreation to Institutional 11. Case CW 04-39: Pinellas County - Recommended approval from Commercial General to Residential Medium as an exception to the Unique/Scenic View SceniclNon-Commercial Corridor Subclassification, with the additional recommendation that the County consider: 1) orienting buildings, parking areas, and other potential ground level obstructions in such a manner as to preserve scenic vistas during the [mal site plan process for this proiect and 2) initiating an amendment for the remainder of Collany Island to a residential ------~.- ------ -'- ------ -------caregoffoftne-same6f1owerdensiIY. - C. Voluntary Annexation Review, VA 04-64 and 65: City of Largo - Approved a finding that the proposed annexations be found in compliance with Pinellas County Ordinance No. 00-63 and transmitted this recommendation to the Countywide Planning Authority as the basis for their determination. . . V. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ITEMS A.Final F.Y. 2004-05 Budget and Millage Rate - Approved and Authorized Transmittal B. Local Government Survey Results - Continued to September 15, 2004 Meeting C. Charter Review COImnission - Status Report - Received/Discussed D. Joint Meeting of PPC and CPA - Follow Up - Received and Discussed E. Preliminary September Agenda - Received F. Verbal Reports - David Healey 1.) advised members that Theresa Harris Goodman, PPC Program Planner, will be leaving the employment of the PPC at the end of this month and 2.) requested and received Council authorization to review a County staff draft of proposed criteria for Ord. No. 00-63 for discussion at the September Council meeting. VI. OTHER COUNCIL BUSINESS A. ChainnanlMember Items - Councilmember Pete Bengston expressed . appreciation to Jewel White Cole, Managing. Senior Assistant County Attorney, for the legal opinion given in response to Seminole's request regarding public notice requirements for voluntary annexations. Councilmember Hoyt Hamilton expressed his desire to see comprehensive solutions to the ongoing annexation issues. B. Correspondence - Received V. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting adiournedat 12:27 p.m. F:\USERS\WPDOCS\PPC Mtg Items\REGITEMS\AGENDAS\ACTION SHEET Jul 04.doc , \ . RECEIVED . 'tE l. --, PINELLAS .. PLANNING . -'--' COUNCIL /JU. I': lJ A.. I...' r I-J .._ '* 11,)4 COUNCIL MEMBERS 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 · Clearwater, Florida 33755-416 NG DEPARTMENifor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman T I h 7274648250 F 7274648212 . II TV; nf CLEADtllllJl~~ Calvin D. Harris, Ed. D., Vice-Chairman Ie ep one . . · ax . . · www.co.plne a . Jj~;P'I"" . r\VVfo\l en: Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Council member Bill Foster, Secretary Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris Councilmember Sandra L. Bradbury Mavor Tom De Cesare Mayor Robert H. DiNicola School Board Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth Commissioner Nadine S. Nickeson July 23,2004 COPIES TO CITY COUNCIL JUL 3 0 2004 PRESS CLERK/ATTORNEY David P. Healey, AICP, Executive Director Mayor Brian Aungst City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756-4748 Dear Mayor Aungst: The Pinellas Planning Council considered at public hearing on Ju~,.20~ two applications from the City of Clearwater for amendment of the Count~Land Use Plan. The Council recommended denial without prejudice of Case CW 04-5) and approval of Case CW 04-36, as noted on page 1 of the accompanying agenda memoranda. These amendments will be considered, including the recommendations of the PPC, by the Board of County Commissioners, in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA), on August 10,2004 at 9:30 a.m. Under separate cover, the City has been notified of its right to apply for Administrative Hearing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of denial as set forth in the attached copy of the Rules outlining the Administrative Hearing process pursuant to Section 5.1.3 of the Countywide Rules. Thank you and your staff for your assistance in the coordination of our countywide planning process. Sincerely, ~12J4(~ Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph. D., Chairman Pinellas Planning Council Attachment: Case Report cc: Councilmember Hoyt Hamilton, Pinellas Planning Council Representative William Home, City Manager Cyndi Tarpani, Planning Director PLANNING FOR. THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY # PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM I AGENDA ITEM: IV B-9. I I MEETING DATE: July 21 , 2004 SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map From: Residential Low - RL To: Residential High - RH Area: 4.4 acres CASE #: CW 04- 35 JURISDICTION: City of Clearwater (LUZ 2004-03002) LOCATION: On the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. TYPE: Regular Map Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based On Accompanying Findings (1. A. & B. [1-6]), Recommend That the Proposed Amendment to Residential High be Denied, and in the Alternative that the Residential Medium Category be Approved, Sub;ect to the City' Limiting Traffic Impacts Pursuant to the CitY's Concurrency Management System. L FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following fmdings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. B. A summarized evaluation of the impact of the amendment on the SIX Relevant Countywide Considerations is as follows: PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council recommended denial without pre;udice of the change from Residential Low to Residential High. (Vote 9-2; City of Clearwater and Group C representatives dissenting) I COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: F:\USERS\ WPDOCS\LU,CASES\04 cases"July\Reports\CW04- 35r,clw. doc .. PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM I AGENDA ITEM: NB-3. SUBJECT: From: To: Area: CASE #: JURISDICTION: LOCATION: TYPE: I I MEETING DATE: July 21,2004 Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map Residential Urban - RU Recreation/Open Space - RIGS 36.6 acres CW 04-36 City of Clearwater (LUZ2004-03003) At the western terminus of Glen Oak Avenue North, approximately 1,250 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. Level I-Type E Subthreshold Map Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based on Accompanying Findings (LA & B), Recommend to the Countywide Planning Authority That The Proposed Level 1 Subthreshold Amendment to Recreation/Open Space Be Approved Pursuant to the Official Acceptance Process. L FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following fmdings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with Division 5.3, Section 5.3.4 of the Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan (Countywide Rilles), the purpose of which is to recognize and provide for Level 1 subthreshold amendments of the Countywide Plan Map. PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council recommended approval of the amendment from Residential Urban to Recreation/Open Space. (Vote 11-0) COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: F :\USERS\ViPDOCS\LU\CASES\04 cases'July\Reports\CW04- 36.clw.doc . . STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor THADDEUS L. COHEN Secretary July 16, 2004 Ms. Cynthia Tarapani Director of Planning City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Tarapani: Thank you for submitting the City of Clearwater's proposed amendment~ ~~ ~ comprehensive plan. Our reference number for this amendment package is Clearwater u4-1. We have conducted an inventory of the plan amendment package to verify the inclusion of all required materi3.Is. The suhmission package appears to be complete, and your proposed plan amendment will be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Once the review is underway, you may be asked to provide additional supporting documentation by the review team to ensure a thorough review. The Department will evaluate the proposed amendments and mail you a notification on August 20, 2004, with its determination as to whether the amendments will be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 163.3184and Rule 9J-11.009, F.A.C. The Department's notification will identify the amendments tbat will and win not be reviewed. Also, please be advised that Section 163.3184(8)(c), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizenswhofumish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens. requesting thisinfotmation to the Department. Pleas~provide these required names and . addresses to theD~plrtment.."hen you transmit your adopted amendment package for complia'nce review: 'In'the event no names, addresses are provided, please provide this information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: httD://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796' Overseas Higtmay, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee. FL 32399-2100 (3051289-2402 (8501488-2356 (8501413-9969 (8501 488-7956 e . STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor July 16, 2004 THADDEUS L. COHEN Secretary Ms. Cynthia Tarapani Director of Planning City of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Dear Ms. Tarapani: The Department's records reflect that the City of Clearwater has submitted its second proposed comprehensive plan amendment submittal for the year 2004. The reference number for this package is DCA # 04-2. Pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(b), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006(1), Florida Administrative Code, local governing bodies shall consolidate all proposed plan amendments into a single submission for each of the two plan amendment adoption dates during the calendar year. Therefore, amendment package DCA # 04-2 is the final submittal that the local government can submit for an amendment adopted during calendar year 2004 unless the amendment meets the requirements of Section 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J- 11.006(1 )(a)7, Florida Administrative Code. If the City is intending to submit another proposed amendment submittal package for adoption in this calendar year, the City should withdraw the amendment package DCA# 04-2 and combine it with the other proposed amendments and then transmit it to the Department pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006, Florida Administrative Code. The Department looks forward to working with and assisting the City in resolving any issues identified in this procedural matter. If you require further assistance concerning this issue, please contact me or Anita Franklin, Senior Plan Processor, at (850) 488-4925 or Suncom 278-4925. Sincerely, ~,~~ D. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and Processing Administrator DRE/af 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/8 uncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/8 uncom 291.0781 , Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796' Overseas Highway, Surte 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399.2100 (305) 289.2402 (8501 488.2358 (850) 413-9969 (8501 488.7958 . . ~ July 16, 2004 Page Two If you have any questions please contact Marina Pennington, Regional Planning Administrator, that will be overseeing the review of the amendment and assigning the amendment to the respective planner for review, at (850) 487-4545. Sincerely, &.~~ D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing DRE/af I, ~ . . STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor THADDEUS L. COHEN Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: Lindy McDowell, DEP Susan Harp, DOS Carol Collins, FDOT7 Gerald Smelt, Tampa Bay RPC Richard Owens, Southwest Florida WMD Brian Smith, Pinellas County SUBJECT: July 16, 2004 COMMENTS FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DATE: LOCAL GOVERNMENT! DCA AMENDMENT #: Oearwater 04-2 DCA CONTACT PERSONIPHONE NUMBER: Marina Pennington (850) 487-4545 RPC REQUEST TO REVIEW TO DCA NO LATER THAN: August 7, 2004 AGENCY'S COMMENTS DUE TO DCA NO LATER THAN: August 15, 2004 Please review the proposed comprehensive plan amendment documents for consistency with applicable provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. Pursuant to FS 163.3184(4), forward objections, recommendations and comments to the attention of Ray Eubanks, Administrator, Plan Review and Processing, at the Department address indicated below. Please use the above referenced DCA AMENDMENT NUMBER on all correspondence related to this amendment. NOTE: Review Agencies - The local government has indicated that they have mailed the proposed amendment directly to your agency. See attached transmittal letter. Be sure to contact the local government if you have not received the amendment. Also, letter to the local government from DCA acknowledging receipt of amendment is attached. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD . TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 8 5 0 .4 8 8 . 8 4 6 6/ Sun com 2 7 8 . 8 4 6 6 FAX: 85 0 . 9 2 1 . 07 8 1/ Sun com 29 1 . 07 8 1 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Oversea$ Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 48!>-2356 (860) 413-9969 (860) 48!>-7956 . . r",T:r:r" t.'~~~LOF Tilt);"'. \\'~\ 1)""'T'~",,...,..~7)t....._ \ ~,., dfl:A~~---7":. ,~~ \ I, ';. <:>. : ~t''r-< ~ - ~ ~2\-"O--==-= ,. ~: ....';.-==~ ;:;;:;., .~-~--~_. .,~~\ ":. . '/;;;.-.--- ,0',,, .\ -...... r~"''''~IT''' ~V.\" #......)1TE~"..t "II' , CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDI?\G, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33756 TELEPHO?\E (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562.4576 LONG RANCE PlAi'lNING DEVELOPMENT REviEW Mr. Ray Eubanks Florida Department of Community Affairs Bureau of Local Planning Division of Community Planning Plan Processing Team 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 June 29, 2004 ~'["'["~f"~ j'I'd, <> __-. -~-~- lW'j - I 2004 ~ ~ , , L..,...,".~"....,_. '- aPM SSP . '.. :... . ,PLMl PI{UCESSI~G TEAM''', ' '"-_._"'=~-" RE: Second Transmittal of a Future Land Use Element Amendment for the City of Clearwater - 2004 Dear Mr. Eubanks: The City of Clearwater is submitting this transmittal as part of the requirements pursuant to 9J- 11.006 "Submittal Requirements for Proposed Local Government Comprehensive Plan Amendments". This is the City's second amendment package transmittal for 2004. The City is transmitting three (3) copies of this amendment package which includes three (3) proposed Plan Amendments with this letter for your review: . LUZ2004-03002 Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Future Land Use Plan Map Amendment LUZ2004-03003 Kapok Wetland Restoration Future Land Use Plan Map Amendment CPA2004-04001 Plan Amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Clearwater Comprehensi ve Plan . . 9J-11.006(1)(a)1: . The Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB), as the Local Planning Agency, held a public meeting on May 18, 2004 for LUZ2004-03002 Bayshore Broadway, Inc Plan Amendment. The Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB), as the Local Planning Agency, held a public meeting on May 18, 2004 for LUZ2004-03003 Kapok Wetland Restoration Plan Amendment. The Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB), as the Local Planning Agency, held a public meeting on June 15, 2004 for CPA2004-04001 Beach by Design Plan Amendment. The CDB unanimously recommended approval to the City Council on the three (3) Plan Amendments. . . BRIAN J, ACNGST, M.\ YOH-CO.\I\lISSIONEH HOlT H'\.\IILTO:\, VICE MAYOR-COM\lISSIONEH \\'HITNEY GHAY, CO\I\lISSIO:\EH FH.\:\K Hl!lB.\RD, CO.\I\IISSIONEH (i) BII.LJOf\:SOf\:, CO\I\IISSIO:\ER "EQL'AL EMPLOY,\lE:"T A?\D AFFm\lATlVE ACTION E\lPI.OYER" . . 9J-l1.006(1)(a)2: The Clearwater City Council held a public hearing on June 17, 2004 to approve the transmittal of the following plan amendments: . LUZ2004-03002 Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Plan Amendment . LUZ2004-03003 Kapok Wetland Restoration Plan Amendment · CPA2004-04001 Beachby Design Plan Amendment The above proposed plan amendments and one copy of each item specified under paragraphs 9J-l1.006(1)(a), (b), (c), and (d), FAC, were sent to the Pinellas County Planning Department, Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Southwest Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of State and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection on June 29, 2004. 9J-11.006(1)(a)3: Two (2) Future Land Use Map amendments and one text amendment is being proposed as part of this submittal package. The following is a summary of this amendment: · LUZ2004-03002 Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Plan Amendment proposes to amend the Future Land Use Map from Residential Low (RL) to Residential High (RH) for 4.4-acres of property to redevelop a site with two single-family homes with multi-family dwellings. · LUZ2004-03003 Kapok Wetland Restoration Plan Amendment proposes to amend the Future Land Use Map from Residential Urban (RU) to Recreation/Open Space (RlOS) for 36.6-acres of property to create the Kapok Wetland and Floodplain Restoration Project. Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposed to revise Policy 2.1.4 of the Future Land Use Element with regard to the areas eligible for the density pool of additional hotel rooms established in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. The City of Clearwater requests the Department to process the proposed amendments as an Expedited Review. 9J-l1.006(1)(a)4: The amendments are proposed for adoption subsequent to receipt of the Department Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) report and preparation of changes required by the report. The anticipated month of adoption is November 2004. 9J-11.006(1)(a)5: concern. Tl1e proposed amendments do not pertain to an area of critical state 9J-l1.006(1)(a)6: The plan amendments are not within Orange, Lake or Seminole Counties. 9J-11.006(1)(a)7: The proposed plan amendments do not qualify as an exemption under the twice per calendar year limitation on the adoption of comprehensive plan amendments. . . 9J-11.006(1)(a)8: Copies of the completed adopted Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, and any amendments to said plan, have been submitted to the following agencies: the Pinellas County Planning Department, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, the Southwest Florida Management District, the Department of State, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Environmental Protection. 9J-11.006(1)(a)9: agreement. The plan amendment is not proposed for adoption under a joint planning 9J-11.006(1)(a)1O: Gina Clayton Long Range Planning Manager 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Telephone: 727-562-4587 Fax: 727-562-4865 Email: gina.clayton@myc1earwater.com If you need further assistance, please contact Gina Clayton. Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. Sincerely, , Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Director of Planning City of Clearwater - Enclosures S:\Planning DepartmenflDCA\JARGE SCALE AMENDMENTSI2004 Submission.NJ2 Amendmenf\2004 2nd lArge scale DCA transmittal letter 06-04. doc . . Pinellas County Planning Department 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 750 Clearwater, FL 33755 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Attn: Gerald Smelt, Principal Planner 4000 Gateway Centre Boulevard, Suite 100 Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Southwest Florida Water Management District Attn: Richard S. Owen, AICP, Planning Director 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, FL 34604-6899 Florida Department of State Bureau of Historic Preservation Attn: Ms. Susan Harp R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, FI 323-99-0250 Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Attn: Carol M. Collins, LGCP & CMS Coordinator 11201 North McKinley Drive Mail Station 7-500 Tampa, FL 33612-6456 Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Lindy McDowell, Environmental Manager Office of Intergovernmental Programs 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 RE: Transmittal of second 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the City of Clearwater. To whom it may concern: Pursuant to Rule 9J-l1.006(1) of the Florida Administrative Code, the City of Clearwater is submitting two (2) proposed Future Land Use Map Amendments and one amendment to the Future Land Use Element to the aforementioned organizations. Also, enclosed is a copy of the transmittal letter sent to the Department of Community Affairs. . . If you need further assistance, please contact Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager at 727 -562-4587. s~ Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Director of Planning City of Clearwater ,,~ -' . . PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM r l! I AGENDA ITEM: IV B-9. I MEETING DATE: July 21,2004 SUBJECT: From: To: Area: CASE #: JURISDICTION: LOCATION: TYPE: Proposed Amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Map Residential Low - RL Residential High - RH 4.4 acres I: .. -= CW 04-35 I:..I..ILIii City of Clearwater (LUZ 2004-01002) On the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. Regular Map Amendment RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based On Accompanying Findings (I. A. & B. [1-6]), Recommend That the Proposed Amendment to Residential High be Denied. and in the Alternative that the Residential Medium Category be Approved. Subiect to the City Limiting Traffic Impacts Pursuant to the City's C:::.::currency Management System. 1. FINDINGS Based on the background data and analysis in this report, the following findings are submitted for consideration of the recommendation for approval of the amendment request: A. The proposed amendment is considered a "regular" amendment because it exceeds the subthreshold size limitations in the Countywide Rules and because it impacts one or more of the six Relevant Countywide Considerations contained in the Countywide Rules. The three impacted considerations are: Consistency With the Countywide Plan and Rules; Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard; and Adjacent to or Impacting an Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Education Facility. B. A summarized evaluation of the impact of the amendment on the SIX Relevant Countywide Considerations is as follows: I PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: I COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: I:\USERSI WPDOCS'LUlCASESI04 cascsJulyIReportsICW04- 35r.clw.doc "'" SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater 1) Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules - The proposed amendment area is not consistent with the locational characteristics of the Residential High category, as enumerated in the Countywide Rules. Also, the proposal is not compatible with the surrounding residential uses or the majority of the future land use designations. However, the Residential Medium category is considered consistent with the locational characteristics in the Countywide Rules as well as the surrounding residential uses and future land use designations. . 2) Adopted Roadway Levtrtl,~o'~~e (LOS) Standard - The amendment area is located on Highland A _~.~~ is designated as an arterial roadway and is operating at LOS "F" frQTQ . Snq/iir;t Point Road to Union Street. Staff s traffic estimates indicate that the proposed amendment would further degrade the existing conditions and the potential Year 2025 traffic volume on Highland Avenue. The alternative Residential Medium designation would lessen the impact expected. 3) ScenicINon-Commercial Corridors (SNCC) - The amendment area is not located within a SNCC, so these policies are not applicable. 4) .,iCoastal High Hazard Areas (CHHA) - The amendment area is not located within -.. a CHHA, so these policies are not applicable. 5) Designated DevelopmentlRedevelopment Areas - The amendment area is not in a Central Business District, Community Redevelopment District or Activity Center, so these policies are not applicable. 6) Adjacent To or Impacting An Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Educational Facility - The amendment area is being annexed by Clearwater and does not adjoin or impact another jurisdiction, nor is it adjacent to a public educational facility. However, the proposed amendment increases the number of dwelling units in this area, thereby potentially increasing the number of students to be served by the public school system. This increase can be accommodated through the School District's Choice System of student assignment. In consideration of and based upon these findings, it is recommended that the proposed amendment of the Countywide Plan Map to Residential High be denied. and in the alternative the Residential Medium category be approved. subiect to the City limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the City's Concurrencv Management Svstem. 2 SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater IL BACKGROUND This regular amendment to the Countywide Plan Map has been submitted by Clearwater to the Council for review in accordance with Division 5.5 of the Countywide Rules. Parcel ID#: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 Existing Use: Two single-family homes Proposed Use: 132 Multi-family residential units Analysis: The proposed amendment from Residential Low to Residential High would allow the site to be developed with homes at a density of up to 30 dwelling units per acre. The 4.4-acre site, located on the east side of Highland Avenue in Clearwater, is proposed for development with 132 town homes. Due to the size of the amendment area and the Countywide Plan category proposed by the City, the amendment is considered a regular amendment and has been reviewed according to three Relevant Countywide Considerations: Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules, Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard, and Adjacency To or Impact Upon An Adjoining Jurisdiction or Public Educational Facility, as set forth below: Consistency with the Countywide Plan and Rules: Two single-family homes occupy the wooded amendment area. Apartments owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority occupy the abutting property to the north and east, designated Residential High, 30 units per acre. To the south and west are single-family residential neighborhoods, designated Residential Urban, 7.5 units per acre. The existing FLUP category of Residential Low could be considered generally consistent with the site and the surrounding single-family area with the exception of its location on a more intensive/higher traffic arterial roadway, as opposed to a collector roadway, and with the other exception of its adjacency with the higher density residential apartment complex on the north and west. These two factors, the arterial roadway and the apartment complex, suggest that additional density could be considered for the site. The purpose of the proposed Residential High category as enumerated in the Countywide Rules is: "...to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as 3 SUBJECT: Case CW 0 - 5 - Clearwater primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such. areas. " As enumerated by the locational characteristics in the Countywide Rules, Residential High is: II ...generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are high density residential in nature; and in areas serving as an urban center. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network and are served by mass transit in a manner that provides an alternative to individual automobile use. " The amendment area is not in close proximity to an urban activity center or other areas that are high density residential in nature. The highest density use adjacent to the amendment area is owned by the Clearwater Housing Authority to the north and east and is built at approximately 20 units per acre, with a FLUP designation of Residential High - with 30 units per acre permitted. Further removed to the north is a 96-unit complex built at 24 units per acre. South and west of the subject area there is an average of 4.3 units per acre, consisting of single-family homes. The homes immediately south of the amendment area are built at less than 3 units per acre. The uses in the vicinity of the proposed amendment, including the uses fronting Highland Avenue, are predominantly single-family and built at less than 5 units per acre, with a FLUP designation of Residential Urban, or 7.5 units per acre. None of the areas mentioned are likely to redevelop at the allowable density in the foreseeable future. The site does not contain wetlands or other pristine natural areas, but it does include a number of large trees that would be under pressure to be removed or compromised by a town home development built at 30 units per acre. The site does have direct access to Highland Avenue, which is classified as a two-lane undivided arterial roadway and is served each hour by the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority. In summary, the site is not appropriate to be developed "in a highly intensive residential manner", nor is the proposed amendment to Residential High "consistent with the qualities and natural resource characteristics of the surrounding area." Therefore, the proposal is not consistent with the Countywide Plan and Rules. In the alternative, the Residential Medium category allows residential development at a density of up to 15 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of the Residential MediUlll category as enumerated in the Countywide Rules is: "...to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a moderately intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. " 4 ". SUBJECT: Case CW 04 55 - Clearwater As enumerated by the locational characteristics in the Countywide Rules, Residential Medium is: "...generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are medium density residential in nature; and in areas serving as a transition between less urban and more urban residential and mixed use areas. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network. " The amendment area is not within or in close proximity to an urban activity center, but is in an area with average development characteristics that more closely resemble medium density. Additionally, building at 15 units per acre, half of what is proposed, will have a lower impact on HigWand Avenue, and should allow the development to be constructed in a manner that preserves the majority of the existing tree canopy. Lastly, the Residential Medium category serves as a tranSItIOn from the 20 unit per acre apartments on the north and east, to the single-family areas on the south and west. This category can also be considered more compatible with the surrounding single-family residential areas than the proposed density of 30 units per acre. Adopted Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Standard: A summary of the Transportation Impact Analysis is included as Attachment 1. The amendment area is located on Highland Avenue, a two lane undivided arterial. Using the methodology adopted as part of the Traffic Characteristics Study conducted for the PPC by Tindale-Oliver, Inc., this roadway is operating at LOS "P" between Sunset Point Road and Union Street. The proposed Residential High category has a general trip generation rate of 183 vehicles per day per acre (vtpd), higher than the 51 vtpd expected to be generated by Residential Low uses. A 4.4- acre project developed with Residential High uses is anticipated to generate 805 trips, 581 more vtpd than the same site developed with Residential Low uses. As stated above, the existing and future (year 2025) LOS is "P" for Highland A venue. The amendment to Residential High would worsen this condition as shown in the volume to capacity (v/c) table found in Attachment I (a number lower than one indicates capacity remaining on the roadway and higher than one indicates the volume above the estimated roadway capacity). The existing vlc ratio is 1.17 and would increase to 1.21. The year 2025 conditions are projected at a 1.22 vlc ratio without the amendment and 1.24 with amendment to Residential High. In summary, the proposed Residential High category's vtpd is considerably higher than the existing Residential Low category. The proposed amendment would therefore increase the existing and potential future traffic volumes on Highland A venue, which is already operating at LOS "P." 5 SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater In the alternative, a change to Residential Medium would lessen the expected impacts. This category is expected to generate 422 vtpd for the amendment site, 383 less than the proposed Residential High (118 more than the existing Residential Low). The LOS would remain "F" with Residential Medium, but the vlc ratios would not increase as much, with the existing again at a 1.17 vlc ratio increasing to 1.19 with amendment to Residential Medium. The year 2025 projections would be a 1.22 vlc ratio (without the amendment) and 1.23, respectively, with Residential Medium. A supplemental recommendation has been added to this report to address the increase in traffic expected on HigWand Avenue. The City's concurrency management standards allow an increase of up to 1 % without mitigation, and mitigation is required above that percentage point. Adjacent to or Impacting Another Jurisdiction or a Public Educational Facility: The amendment area is not adjacent to another jurisdiction, but may impact the public school system since it involves residential uses that will likely include school age children. The amendment to Residential High would allow development of up to 132 dwelling units. Using the Pinellas County School District's standard ratio of 0.3 students per household, development of the site could bring an additional 40 students to this area. According to the representatives of the School District, these students will be accommodated through the Choice Plan. Additionally, while the amendment area is approximately ~ mile from the Dunedin HigWand Middle School, no traffic circulation issues or problems are expected to be created by the development, nor is there any issue with respect to compatibility with the school. Local Government Transmittal: On June 17, 2004, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, acting as the applicant local government, gave initial approval to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan, and authorized an application for amendment of the Countywide Plan Map. In summary, the proposed amendment to Residential High is inconsistent with the Countywide Plan and Rules and. the subject area is not an appropriate location in which to apply this Countywide Plan category. In consideration of and based upon these findings, it is recommended that the proposed amendment of the Countywide Plan Map to Residential High be denied. and in the alternative the Residential Medium category be approved. subiect to the City limiting traffic impacts pursuant to the City's Concurrencv Management Svstem. Planners Advisory Committee (PAC): At its meeting on July 12, 2004, the PAC recommended approval of the staff recommendation (Vote 9-1; Clearwater dissenting). The minutes from the PAC's discussion of this case are provided at the back of this report as Attachment 4. 6 SUBJECT: Case CW 04-35 - Clearwater IlL LIST OF MAPS & ATTACHMENTS Map 1 Location Map 2 Countywide Plan Category & Jurisdictional Map - Black & White Map 3 Aerial- Black & White Map 4 Countywide Plan Category - Color Attachment 1 Calculation of Traffic Impacts Attachment 2 PPC Disclosure of Interest Form Attachment 3 Attachment 4 Local Government Transmittal Package Draft PAC Minutes 7 . . RECEiVE 01 1'04 JUL 06 2004 OFFICIAL Rj:COR~",,- COUNCIL MEMBERS _ ! is ;.;;.I..~l, "_ LtGISLATIVE SRVCS DCc' 600 Cleveland Street Suite 850 . Clearwater Florida 33755-4160 . - Mayor Robert E. Jackson, Ph.D., Chairman , I. II fl Commissioner Calvin D. Harris, Ed.D., Vice-Chairman Telephone 727.464.8250 · Fax 727.464.8212 · www.eo.pme as. .us/ppe Vice-Mayor Hoyt Hamilton, Treasurer Councilmember Bill Foster, Secretary Councilor Pete Bengston Mayor Jerry Beverland Mayor Beverley Billiris Council member Sandra L. Bradbury Mayor Tom De Cesare Mayor Robert H. DiNicola School Board Chairman Jane Gallucci Commissioner Bob Hackworth Commissioner Nadine S. Nickeson JU]Y2,20RECE\VED JUL 0 9 2004 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING DEPARTMENT C\TY OF CLEARWATER IMPORTANT David P. Healey, AICP, Executive Director FOR AMENDMENTOFCOUNT~DEPLAN W07"oZ. The Pinellas County Planning Council (PPC) and the Board of County Commissioners, in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA), will conduct public hearings on proposed land use plan amendments to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan (Countywide Plan) for P inellas County, pursuant tot he Rules C onceming t he Administration 0 f the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, As Amended (Plan Rules), as identified in the accompanying copy of the Notice of Amendment. Please refer to the case(s) and information pertinent thereto, including the date, time and place of the public hearings, as set forth on the accompanying Notice of Amendment. The noted amendment(s) include property: /within the jurisdiction of your local government; o which may be of interest to your local government; o for which you have been identified as the owner/representative of record as referenced in the attached legal notice. Also included for your information are the PPC submission and public hearing procedures. Please note, in particular, that any written materials to be considered at public hearing should be submitted not later than seven (7) days prior to the date of public hearing. Please contact us at the address or telephone number listed above with any questions. PLANNING FOR THE PINELLAS COMMUNITY . . NOTICE OF AMENDMENT OF COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN The Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) and the Board of County Commissioners, in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA), will conduct public hearings on proposed map amendments to the "Countywide Future Land Use Plan for Pinellas County" (Countywide Plan), pursuant to the "Rules Concerning the Administration of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan", as amended (Countywide Rules), as set forth below. The PPC public hearing will be held on Wednesday, July 21, 2004, at 9:30 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Assembly Room, 5th Floor, Pinellas County Courthouse, 315 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida. The CPA public hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 10. 2004, at 9:30 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioners Assembly Room, 5th Floor, Pinellas County Courthouse, 315 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida. The PPC will make a recommendation to the CPA on the proposed amendments to the Countywide Plan map as listed below, or to other plan categories as determined appropriate, submitted by Pinellas County and the cities of Clearwater, Pinellas Park, and St. Petersburg, in accordance with Chapter 88-464, Laws of Florida, as amended, and the Countywide Rules. Any amendment that qualifies as a subthreshold amendment will be considered under the official acceptance process and will be approved by the PPC and CPA as subthreshold, unless by majority vote of either board, it is removed from the subthreshold portion of the agenda and continued for consideration as a regular amendment at a later date. Any member of the public or interested person may be heard at the public hearings with respect to a request to remove a subthreshold amendment for continuation and consideration at a later date. The proposed Countywide Plan map amendments are listed as follows: 1) CW 04-29 - City of Sf. Petersbura - 11.7 acres From: Preservation, Industrial Limited, Activity Center/Primary Overlay, and Vvater/Drainage Feature Overlay To: Industrial Limited, Activity Center/Primary Overlay, and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay Generally located at the northeast corner of 16th Street North and 102nd Avenue North. . The proposed amendment would change the designation for two areas totaling 2.4 acres previously recognized as environmental preserves from Preservation to Industrial Limited. This amendment is proposed to reflect the City's determination that conditions in these areas no longer warrant preservation. Primary uses allowed by the proposed Industrial Limited category inClude research/development, light manufacturing/assembly, wholesale/distribution, and storage/warehouse. No change is proposed to the existing Industrial Limited, Activity Center/Primary Overlay, or Water/Drainage Feature Overlay . . areas. 2) CW 04-30 - City of Sf. Petersburg - 0.4 acres From: Commercial General and Activity Center/Primary Overlay To: Central Business District and Activity Center/Primary Overlay Generally located on the southeast corner of 4th Avenue North and Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North. This amendment is proposed for development with an office building. Primary uses allowed within the existing Commercial General category include office, personal service, retail, commercial, business. service, hotel/motel, wholesale/distribution, and storage/warehouse uses. The proposed Central Business District designation would allow uses consistent with the City's redevelopment plan. No change is proposed to the existing Activity Center/Primary Overlay designation. 3) CW 04-31 - City of Sf. Petersburg - 0.2 acres From: Residential Medium To: Residential/Office/Retail Generally located on the south side of 50th Avenue North, approximately 120 feet west of 4th Street North. This amendment is proposed to allow the site to be combined with adjacent parcels for redevelopment with a retail use,. The existing Residential Medium category allows residential development up to a potential density of 15 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Residential/Office/Retail category would allow residences up to a potential density of 18 dwelling units per acre. Other primary uses allowed in the Residential/Office/Retail category - include office, retail commercial, personal service/office support, commercial/business service, and hotel/motel uses. 4) CW 04-32 - City of Sf. Petersburg -1.1 acres From: Industrial General To: Industrial Limited Generally located on the south side of 5th Avenue South, between 29th and 30th Streets South. This amendment is proposed to allow development of an office building. Primary uses allowed in the proposed Industrial Limited category include research/development, light manufacturing/assembly, wholesale/distribution, and storage/warehouse uses. Primary uses allowed in the existing Industrial General category include research/development, light and heavy manufacturing/assembly, wholesale/distribution, storage/warehouse, agricultural processing, and vehicular salvage. 5) CW 04-33 - City of PineJlas Park - 5.8 acres From: Institutional and Commercial General To: Residential Medium Generally located on the west side of US Highway 19 North, approximately 950 feet north of 110th Avenue North. This amendment is proposed to allow multi-family residential up to a potential density of 15 dwelling units per acre. A portion of the site is currently designated Commercial General, in which primary uses allowed include office, personal . . service, retail, commercial, business service, hotel/motel, wholesale/distribution, and storage/warehouse uses. The remainder of the site is currently designated Institutional, in which primary uses include schools, hospitals, medical clinics, religious institutions, government uses, and similar types of public/semi-public uses are allowed. 6) CW 04-34 - City of Pinellas Park - 3.1 acres From: Commercial General To: Residential/Office/Retail Generally located at the southeast corner of 66th Street and 94th Avenue. This amendment is proposed to allow a private school. Primary uses allowed in the proposed Residential/Office/Retail category include residential development, offices, retail uses, personal services, and business services. These same uses are also allowed as primary uses in the existing Commercial General designation, in addition to wholesale/distribution and storage/warehouse. 7) CW 04-35 - City of Clearwater - 4.4 acres From: Residential Low and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay To: Residential High and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay Generally located on the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. This amendment is proposed to allow multi-family residential development up to a potential density of 30 dwelling units per acre. The existing Residential Low category would allow residential development up to a potential density of 5 dwelling units per acre. No change is proposed to the existing Water/Drainage Feature Overlay designation. 8) CW 04-36 - City of Clearwater - 36.6 acres From: Residential Urban, Preservation and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay To: Recreation/Open Space, Preservation and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay Generally located at the western terminus of Glen Oak Avenue North, approximately 1,250 feet west of McMullen Booth Road. This amendment is proposed forthe Kapok Wetland and Floodplain Restoration ProJect on vacant lands owned by the City of Clearwater. The existing Residential Urban category would allow residential development up to a potential density of 7.5 dwelling units per acre. No change is proposed to the existing Preservation or Water/Drainage Feature Overlay designations. 9) CW 04-37 - Pinellas County -14.6 acres From: Commercial Recreation To: Institutional Generally located at the southwest corner of 28th Street North and 50th Avenue North. This amendment is proposed to allow a public school. Primary uses allowed within the proposed Institutional category include hospitals, medical clinics, religious institutions, government uses, and similar types of public/semi-public uses. Primary uses allowed in the existing Commercial Recreation category .. . . include waterfront/marina facilities, sports stadiums, and race track/para-mutual facilities. 10) CW 04-38 - Pinellas County - 0.4 acres From: Commercial General To: Residential Low Generally located on the east side of Murray Road, approximately 287 feet south of Walsingham Road. This amendment is proposed to allow a single-family home on the site. Primary uses allowed within the existing Commercial General category include office, personal service, retail, commercial, business service, hotel/motel, wholesale/distribution, and storage/warehouse uses. The proposed Residential Low category allows residential development up to a potential density of 5 dwelling units per acre. 11) CW 04-39 - Pinellas County - 6.8 acres From: Commercial General To: Residential Medium Generally located on the north side and western terminus of Sands Point Drive, and at the western terminus of Collany Road. This amendment is proposed to allow multi-family residential development up to a potential density of 15 dwelling units per acre. Primary uses allowed within the existing Commercial General category include office, personal service, retail, commercial, business service, hotel/motel, wholesale/distribution, and storage/warehouse uses. The details of the proposed amendments, including more detailed lists of potential uses associated with each Countywide Plan category, are available at the office of the PPC, 600 Cleveland St., Ste. 850, Clearwater, Florida, 33755; further information about the proposed amendments can be obtained by calling (727) 464-8250. Interested parties are invited to attend the hearings to present facts or express views on the cases shown in this advertisement. The public is hereby advised that the effect of any proposed amendment may significantly impact the type and intensity of use of the subject property and may be of interest to neighboring property owners. The PPC will make an advisory recommendation to the CPA for approval, approval with modification or conditions, denial, denial with alternative recommendations, or continuance of the items. The recommendation by the PPC and the action of the CPA may amend the Countywide Plan from the existing plan category to the proposed plan category as referenced above for the amendment, or to another plan category as may be determined appropriate based on the public hearings and consistent with the Countywide Plan, Countywide Rules and procedures related thereto. If a person substantially affected decides to request an administrative hearing based on a decision to deny the request at any of these hearings, they will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record ofthe proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the petition for the hearing is to be based. . . If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Within two (2) working days of your receipt ofthis notice, plf~ase contact the Office of Human Rights, 400 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Ste. 500, Clearwater, FL 33756, (727) 464-4062 (VITDD). . KEYSTONE RD ,. ( PR= PINE LLAS PLANNING COU.NCIL 2 "";lES . . P1JBLIC HE~G PROCEDURES Public Hearings before the Pinellas Planning Council are governed by Pinellas Planning Council Resolution No. 96-2 which is outlined on the reverse side. Because this process encourages and provides for testimony to be submitted in writing in advance of the hearing, the following guidelines are expected to be sufficient to accommodate efficient presentations: · The applicant should complete their presentation in ten (10) minutes. · Persons who have been authorized to represent an organization or group of five (5) or more persons should linllttheir presentation to ten (10) minutes. It is expected that others in the organization or group will waive their tiIne. · All other persons may speak up to a total of three (3) mir~lUtes each. The Planning Council procedure provides that, at the conclusion of each of the respective presentations by staff, PAC, applicant local government, proponents, opponents and other citizens, an affected party may seek the Chair's permission to ask questions or seek clarification from the respective presenter. The applicants rebuttal shall only address testimony subsequent to their presentation. Only points of law or fact will be entertained by the Chair following rebuttal. Please see reverse side for order of presentation. ..",:fi.:.~!'...;:!!..!i::!;.:..ii;:;!i.:i:ii.i.iiil~nIJ!($...IIIBli ....... OPE~GPROCEDURES Explanation of Hearing Process - Chair Swearing In - Reporter STAFF PRESEl\TTATION 10 minutes max. PAC C01v1:MENTS':' AS NECESSARY 5 minutes max. APPLICANT LOCAL GOVT 10 minutes max. PROPONENTS - PRESENT A TIONS/INOUlRlES Applicant Property Owner - 10 minutes max. Public - Desig. Repres. - 10 minutes max. - Individual - 3 minutes max. OPPONENTS - PRESENT A TIONSIINOUIRIES Subject Property Owner- 10 minutes max. Public - Desig. Rep. - 10 minutes max. - Individual - 3 minutes max. OTHER CITIZENS - COMMENTS/OUESTIONS (Other Than Proponents/Opponents) 3 minutes max. REBmT AL BY APPLICANT Local Govemment- 5 minutes max. Applicant Property (hvner - 5 minutes ~ STAFF RESPONSElSUlv1MARY 5 minutes max. COUNCIL QUESTIONS CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING :i'I:::.;~'ii::i:i::';::':';!::i::i'::..ii':i;'::i'::'~;i;;:;!:i:.::::':;p~.lI_ii.:gr.t.QN:ii;'!.i'::':;;ii;;i.fi:ii::;i::::i;;i::;i::i.i:i:i;;:i'i:~i;i:i::;:::i;i:Ii;;:: . '. CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ANNEXATION, LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS The City of Clearwater, Florida, proposes to adopt the following ordinance at a public hearing held on Thursday, July 15, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter as the matter may be heard, in Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. (Leonard and Mary Chetkin) ANX2<f.It.E004-03002: ORDTNANC.R NO. 7299-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The proposed ordinance will affect the land area shown on the map in this advertisement: (INSERT MAP HERE) The public hearings for second reading ordinances amending the Future Land Use Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance No. 7300-04) and Zoning Atlas of the City (Ordinance No. 7301-04) related to this land area HA VE BEEN CANCELED due to a requirement they be reviewed and approved by the State Department of Community Affairs prior to second reading being considered. Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to obtain a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager, at 562-4587 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk City of Clearwater, P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 A Copy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. Ad: 6/27/04 / '" . . Comprehensive Plan Citizen Courtesy Information List Local Government: City of Clearwater Hearing Date: June 17,2004 Type Hearing: Transmittal (Proposed): LUZ2004-03002; 2025 North Highland Avenue DCA Amendment Number: (DCA Official Use) Please Print Clearly By providing your name and address you will receive information concerning the date of publication of the Notice of Intent by the Department of Community Affairs. .... ..1 Check Appropriate Box Identify Amendment which is of Interest Address, City, State, Citizen Name Zip Code ................... Written Comment .............. .................... m ..... 1b~ ... ... .... Over for more spaces / * . . . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE ANNEXATION, LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS Schedule of Public Hearings: Tuesday, May 18,2004 before the Community Development Board, at 2:00 p.m. Thursday, June 17,2004 before the City Commission (1st Reading), at 6:00 p.m. Thursday, July 15, 2004 before the City Commission (2nd Reading), at 6:00 p.m. All public hearings on the ordinances will be held in Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. (Leonard and Mary Chetkin) ANX2004-03004/LUZ2004-03002 NOTE: All persons wishinf! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the Communitv Development Board meetinf!. Those cases that are not contested bv the applicant, staff. neif!hborinf! propertv owners, etc. will be placed on a consent af!enda and approved bv a sinf!le vote at the bef!inninf! of the meetinf!. The City of Clearwater, Florida, proposes to adopt the following ordinances: ORDINANCE NO. 7299-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 7300-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL HIGH; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO.7301-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request and obtain party status by the Board during the case discussion, a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that slhe is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing in all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. The Community Development Board will review the case and make a recommendation to the City Commission for final disposition. . . Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Gina Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager, at 562-4587 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk City of Clearwater, P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO P ARTICIP ATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. Ad: 05/02/04 & 06/27/04 -I .' . . ORDINANCE NO. 7300-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL HIGH; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Property See legal description attached hereto. (LUZ2004-03002) Land Use Cateqorv Residential High Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7299-04. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor Appr~ved as to form~/-- ~ - I -- '-) J ;l. K" ,x-, Leslie K. Dougall- ides Assistant City Attorney Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7300-04 -' . . i LEGAL: PARCEL /: BEGIN AT rrlE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1~/4 OF ~'"'EC710N 2. TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH. RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNl'Y, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 300 FEET; THENCE EAST 50 FEET TO THE PO/NT OF BEGINNiNG; THElvCE NORTH JB7 FEET; THENCE EAST 287.6 FEET;' THENCE SOUTH 367 FEET; THE-AleE WEST 287.6 FEET TO THE PO/NT OF BEGINNiNG. . PARCEL II: Tl-lE SOUTH .JOO FEET OF THE WEST 337.$1 FEET OF T:#-/E N.E.. 1./4 OF TrlE N. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 2~. TOW.NSHIP 29 SOuTH. RANGE 15 EAST; LESS THE SOUTH 100 FEET AND LESS THE WEST 50 FEET THEREOF FOR RQAD FilGHT -OF - *~ r. PARCEL /1/: THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE WEST 337.51 FEET OF THE N.E. 1,/4 OF THE N.~ 1/'4 OF SEC170N 2. TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH~ RANGE 15 EAST; LESS THE WEST 50 FEET rrlEREOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY .' . ;' ,- ---I , 2076 , , '__1 20[5_.. _f ,-- -, -.-*, Cl) .... ,_' I '-:.-~ ,-~.,.-: :Ipli9' . I_:~~~ , -: ""',.... 1 L , , -----, !.._,----- : ' L _~' , :___t' , , , '20M , .. -- I ~b63 :. .. ~064 i , , , , " .. --, , -' r ---, , , ~.... : , , ,-S05a ~57:_ ' , , , .., " , , ' , , , ' , -- " , .' .. :' , ~.o;;ll 2051 " " , . -!!05'2 :--z~ . , , ,- , , l_ _, ~ -- 204'0 , , . . , :" - '2'036: L, jl , , ;'~Md :_.. I , , ,-" .. - .. , , I :.. __I ~ -.. :!: : -- --i(l24 L _ . , '. , --, :-"20:,8 , , , , , , , , ..- -, I 1.._.. :' :c1; '------::!: , ,- , , CD _.. I ~-I ,_J RIDGELANE RD Cl) :m_,~ , , I ," I .. ";,_ .:1_.. n, 16 ._~ ---~I .-- .., , I I I _I ____I 1.____, .... . ..... , -, , , , , , , , , l~- --.. , " I C'\l CO I I____~I ~-,..~ ~ ~ :b c: ::0 tJ 1'45; , , , , , , '.. --' ,..--- -, ,- , I ';:',. :. -0046 .- --, , , I 1._, : 2040 ,--" -, , , , , : 20~6 . ---, , , , , 1~___~OjO 1-----' :-.. ,: : 2~24 ~.. -, ..' " , , :.. _2918 , -, .-" ---I '0 ' ~I---'" Ol -..--1: --. : '.... -' __I--I'j , , " ..--Q0 ...., ~ , , '" , Ol , ~---- :.R q.i!! -_: '135..... : I "_. , , , , 2~--1 , , , -- I....... ~ 2~P-:-1 , .' , , . -' ::!/iT?--; , , , , 1___1 ,-----j , , e:,.-. I co --- ~ .... '" ___r~ :-~-,-i " ' _____! I____..! BYRAM DR '" ~------: '- t : ._, I L __I -~_:-: , , , , ,-....-.. ! . 2075 ,---- ...---' , 1__ __ 1----".._-------,--.._, ,_, I I 1 1 I I I I 1______----------..--, I._I 1- -' - -- - - - - - - - -..- -~ -- , ' ~ - -I' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'_ _ j i-----~ I , , , , , , , , , , , I , :______1 1-----, , , , , ~____J , , , , , , , , , , ___.1 r --I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , :- - ~ 206{i..n_-., , , I , . , . , , , , , , , I , ... __ - __I ,-------1'--------------, , , ~--------------..______1 ;-m----"RHm-m-j I . 1 1 ~__________J :___________: [~~: ~~ ~~~~:~~ ~ ~~ ~:~~~~ ~~~_- _-1 r--- , ' , ' , ' , ' 1- _ _ ~ ...-- -, , , , , , , , , ,_ ___I ~ :!: G) :t: ~ ~ :b rii '-----4------ , ' :..._---------_: , , " , , r-------------~ I , " L______________ , , , '__.J 1__, ,-- -- - --.. --.._- -- - _..- ------. , , , , 1_ __I' - - - -- - -_ ___ ___ 4- - -- --- r- -I 1-- I , <rl :--L_~ Ol ,...~ , .. I.___J ~-I_- , : _.! L__I 1- -.. , 1--1 1----' ___ I 0""1 1 I_I :__~J I--~: L ~ ~ -I-e ~1<96~ Ordinance No. 7300-04 v t . . ORDINANCE NO.7301-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06,21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Property See legal description attached hereto. (LUZ2004-03002) Zonino District Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7299-04. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor Appn?ved as to form: \// . i ,... 1<) .t.) ,,I, .. !.. ., ,/ .../ ../ ./.. ;(rj(c~; Afft91 .... Leslie K. Dougall-sides Assistant City Attorne!y Attest: ~/<;:~~ Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7301-04 ! . . LEGAL: P4RCEL I: BEGIN AT mE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHYJi"ES! 1/4 OF SECnON 2. TOW-A/SHIP 29 SOUTH. RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNT't; FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 300 FEET; THENCE EAST SO FEET TO THE PO/NT OF BEG!NNjNG~. THElvCE NORTH 387 FEET; THENCE EAST 287.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 367 FEU; THENCE WEST 287.0 FEEl TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ' PARCEL 11: r.s-lE SOUTH SOD FEET OF THE WEST 337.51 FEET OF T:*",E /'J.E. 1,,/4 OF TrlE N.jt: 1/-4 OF SECTION 2~ TOWNSHIP 29 SOI.J7H. RANGE 15 EAST; LESS THE SOUTH 100 FEET AND LESS THE WEST SO FEET THEREOF FOR RQ4D RIGHT -OF-WAr: PARCEL 1//: THE SOUTH 100 feET OF" THE WEST 337.61 FEET OF THE /'J.E. 1//4 OF THE N. >>: 1/4- OF SECTION 2_ TOWNSHIP 29 SOI.J71i RANGE 15 EAST: LESS THE WEST 50 FEET rrlE.f?EOF FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY : .. to --I .._..-~I I I _I " , .'1 I .. -.. '-... ---' 0> .... -......-~ I-~-'--: ..,., _ 1 _____1 t.._,----- ......., . ... ... _120~ , , :- --~-j /2058 .., " , , :--2"~ ~ I-i , , l.. _I ~ -- 204'0 ~ .. ~ . , ,-- --... , , , .---10 , <0 ~ :-'2008 , , , , , , , , ,.- -. , , .... --.. , ~ l_____~ , ,- , , CD _.. I ~_I I_~ ~P~/I ,- -"'-. , , , . 20[5_ _ J 2/J59- . L, : ' :___~-l ~oijj :. , , .' ~--~ :!JS7 :', , -' 2051 ~ ill ):) c:: ~ 2114&. , " , , , , , , , , '. ' ., , 2~~ __: 2Q'3~;- - ~ I "'_, , 2~--: I ,: , , 1..-- ... 2~~-:_, , .' , : 2/1W'; , , , , 1___1 .-----j , , 0.-.. I CO --- ~ RIDGELANE RD . :_~(F6 .- -- , ,_I I 1- '20rb 1_... .. , " ... ~064i r'" --, , , , , , , , , .. ~I " , - -0052 ::----: I r:" :... -ooJa .---. , , : 2~o;;O , -, ,-'" --., , , , , L ... _2_0~6 . ---, , , , , 1~___~OjO .-----, , : 1_... r : 2~24 j" --I ..' 11 , , :_,ffJJB , -, ,-" "''''-. '0 ' ~I___.J 0> :m_,~ , , ~"i_l~- ! n, l6 ._~ ---:!-. ~-- -l , , I I _, ____I "'____, a; -..-- ~ , --I : '-_ _I -- ....- 1 . . . ~Vb- -~ . ~ , -- r-' ----. r---'-, , , : lB : ~...V" - - I , , '---; !II ,-~ ,J- --.. , " I CIl (0 I I----~~~"i-! ;::: :--~~-. , ' L.. _I 1_- _, ..... '--""'; , , C'O . --1:4:1 - -, ::.!: , , '" , 0> , ~-- -- BYRAM DR ~------I ~ , 1_, : .. -. I L __I 0; --- ..' , ,___I : , , ,-....- - ~ . 2075 L__ _I : - -- -"_ - - - - - - - - I - -.. _, , : 1- _ _-.. __ ___ ___ ___.. __' , -. , , , , L_' 1_ _F --___ ___ ___..- -,__ , , : - -.. - - - - - - - - - - - - "_ _1 " , i-----~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , : -...... ---' , , I , , , , , , , , ___I ,- - - - - - -.. - - - - - - -- .. - - - - - , , , ~------"-------..______1 '-----1 , , , , ~-----' r --I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , :- - ~ " 2D6;i- - - - n, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . '------, , , , , , , 1___________1 HDR i - -. --- -- -. -- - - - -- --- - -----: r --- , ' , ' , ' , ' '- - - ~ .,.- --I , , , , , '- ---' ,-----..-----.. , , , : .....- - -- -- -- -..- ,---: , , , , I.. 1 " , , , , , , : : :...-------------: : , ,1...______________ I , , I , '_ _ oJ 1__, 1- - --.. -- - --.. - - __ - __- -__ - __, , , , , 1_ _ _F - -- --... -... ___ _ __..- ___ ___ ,- -, ,- - , , to' :n ~ l_=-" ~ -0>' , -, ,-- - I , I,' ~-I__--' -..... , '-- -.. - " , . , , , , , , , , , , , --, 0> ,--".,]I , ... L -__J ~-1--1 L_,-~ t'"' -- , :--~-I :----' 1--- :--~.! '--ig.: L ~ ~ -'~ J9~ ~' ,I , , -Hl6l!, '- , Ordinance No. 7301-04 . ORDINANCE NO. 7300-04 . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL HIGH; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Property See legal description attached hereto. (LUZ2004-03002) Land Use Cateoorv Residential High Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7299-04. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7300-04 . ORDINANCE NO.7301-04 . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06,21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pine lias County, Florida, is hereby zoned as indicated upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Property See legal description attached hereto. (LUZ2004-03002) Zoninq District Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7299-04. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7301-04 , . . ...'1', CDB Meeting Date: ~ Case Number: L~2 Agenda Item: E--4 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin. APPLICANT: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE: Alex Panik (Panik Engineering, Inc.) LOCATION: 2025 North Highland Avenue. REQUEST: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low (RL) Classification (County) to Residential High (RR) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and (b) Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City of Clearwater) (pending ANX2004-03004). SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 191,664 square feet or 4.4 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 567 feet wide by 287 feet deep PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Single-family dwellings Multi-family dwellings PLAN CATEGORY: Current Category: Proposed Category: Residential Low (RL) (County) Residential High (RH) (City) Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 1 . . , ZONING DISTRICT: Current District: Proposed District: ~ ,'''' to, ;.\~..".~, .- . " '~.' i:-'lo A-E, Agricultural Estar~~tc5~ty,.:! MHDR, Medium High-nensrr~~dential (City) EXISTING SURROUNDING USES: North: Multi-family residential South: Single-family residential East: Multi-family residential West: Single-family residential ANALYSIS: This Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) amendment and rezoning application involves three parcels of land, approximately 4.4 acres in area included in a companion application to annex the overall property into the City of Clearwater (Case# ANX2004-03004). The site is currently occupied by two single-family dwellings and has a FLUP designation of Residential Low (RL) and a zoning classification of A-E, Agricultural Estate (County). The applicant is requesting to amend the FLUP designation of the site to the Residential High (RH) classification and to rezone it to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. If approved, the site will be developed with attached dwellings. In accordance with the Countywide Plan Rules, the land use plan amendment is subject to approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and Board of County Commissioners acting as the Countywide Planning Authority. Based on the density of the amendment request, review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs is required. I. CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN [Section 4-603.F.l] Applicable Goals, Objectives and Policies from the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan in support of the proposed land use plan amendment are as indicated below: 2.1 Objective -The City of Clearwater shall continue to support innovative planned development and mixed land use development techniques in order to promote infill development that is consistent and compatible with the surrounding environment. 2.2.1 Policy - On a continuing basis, the Community Development Code and the site plan approval process shall be utilized in promoting infill development and/or planned developments that are compatible. 3.0 Goal - A sufficient variety and amount of future land use categories shall be provided to accommodate public demand and promote infill development. 5.1.1 Policy - No new development or redevelopment will be permitted which causes the level of City services (traffic circulation, recreation and open space, water, sewage treatment, garbage collection, and drainage) to fall below minimum acceptable levels. However, development orders may be phased or otherwise modified consistent with provisions of Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 2 . . the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. 16.1 Objective - Assure an adequate supply of housing in Clearwater by providing for additional new dwelling units in a variety of types, costs, and locations to meet the needs of the residents of the City of Clearwater. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The purpose of the proposed Residential High (RH) category, as specified in Section 2.3.3.3.1 of the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The Residential High (RH) category is generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are high density residential in nature; and in areas serving as an urban center. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network and are served by mass transit in a manner that provides an alternative to individual automobile use. This designation is generally not appropriate for coastal high hazard and evacuation level "A" areas. The proposed use of the property for a townhome development is consistent with the purposes of the Residential High (RH) category. The site is adjacent to property currently used for high density residential purposes and is located along a major arterial, North Highland Avenue. The site is also located in close proximity to Sunset Point Road, another major arterial. The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the purpose and locational characteristics of the Countywide Plan. III. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER OF THE CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Section 4-602.F.2 & 4-603.F.3] Primarily single- and multi-family dwellings characterize North Highland Avenue, between Union Street and Sunset Point Road. There are a variety of non-residential uses located farther to the north of the site at the southeast comer of North Highland Avenue and Union Street. Offices and retail uses are located at the southeast and west comers of North Highland Avenue and Sunset Point Road. Residential High (RH) future land use is located to the north and east of the site, while Residential Low (RL) future land use is located farther to the north of the site. Residential High (RH) dominates the land use to the north and east of the property while Residential Urban (RU) land use is located to the west and south. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 3 . . " The existing surrounding uses include single-family dwellings to the west and south and multi- family residential dwellings to the north and east. Office buildings are located to the north and northwest of the site. The proposed FLUP designation and rezoning is in character with the overall FLUP designation along this block and is compatible with surrounding uses. IV. SUFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES As stated earlier, the subject site is approximately 4.4 acres in area and is presently occupied by two single-family dwellings. Based on a maximum permitted density of five units per acre in the Residential Low (RL) category, 22 dwelling units could be constructed on this site. The allowable development potential in the Residential High (RH) category is 30 units per acre, which would allow 132 dwelling units to be constructed on this site. Roadways The accepted methodology for reviewing the transportation impacts of proposed plan amendments is based on the Pinellas Planning Council's (PPC) traffic generation guidelines. The PPC's traffic generation rates have been calculated for the subject site based on the existing and proposed FLUP categories and are included in the next table. N ortb Highlan~Aventi~:>'Betweel1~ij, Union Street Maximum Daily Added Potential Tri s Maximum PM Peak Hour Added Potential Trips3 Volume of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road to Union Street LOS of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road to Union Street NI A = Not Applicable LOS = Level-of-Service 1 = Based on PPC calculations of 51 trips per acre per day for the Residential Low Future Land Use Category. 2 = Based on PPC calculations of 183 trips per acre per day for the Residential High Future Land Use Category. 3 = Based on MPO K-factor. Source: "The Rules" of the Countywide Future Land Use Plan MUMPOTENTI1\:L TRAFFIC Point Rb'a.d,& Cll..re~~ Exis~ingJHlnJ Situation N/A N/A 15,200 224 21 15,424 Proposed Flan2 805 76 16,005 C C C C Based on the 2003 Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Level of Service Report, the segment of North Highland Avenue from Sunset Point Road and Union Street has a LOS of F. The applicant submitted a traffic impact study prepared by Avid Engineering that concluded that this segment of Highland Avenue is actually operating at a LOS C. Upon further review of the MPO Level of Service Report, the Clearwater Traffic Operations Division determined that the report did not include existing turn lanes at Union Street and Sunset Point Road and did not account for construction underway along Highland Avenue (Patricia Avenue) north of this segment. Based on information provided by the City, the MPO has revised the LOS for this segment of North Highland Avenue between Union Street and Sunset Point Road from F to C. Traffic from the subject site will be distributed to North Highland Avenue. Based on a traffic impact study prepared by the applicant, the anticipated increase in PM peak trips will not degrade the LOS for Highland Avenue. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 4 . './ . Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have also been analyzed for the level of vehicle trips that could be generated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Manual. Existing Zoning/Future Land Use Plan 22 dwelling units N/A N/A Townhome/Condo (5.86 trips/dwelling unit) Proposed Zoning/Future Land Use Plan 132 dwelling units 132 dwelling units 774 563 71 49 Apartments (6.63 trips/dwelling unit) 875 664 88 66 The City of Clearwater Engineering Department has concluded based on the traffic impact study provided by the applicant that the transportation impacts associated with this land use plan amendment are minimal and will not degrade the LOS of Highland Avenue. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the increase in PM peak. trips will have no impact on the operational efficiency of the signalized intersections within this segment of Highland Avenue. Mass Transit The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The total miles of fixed route service will not change; the subject site is located along an existing transit route and headways are less than or equal to one hour. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) bus service is available along North Highland Avenue. Water The current FLUP category could use up to 5,500 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, water demand could approach approximately 33,000 gallons per day. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for water. Wastewater The current FLUP category could produce up to 4,400 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, sewer demand could approach approximately 26,400 gallons per day. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for wastewater. Solid Waste The current Residential Low FLUP category would result in the production of 56 tons of solid waste per year. Under the proposed FLUP category, the proposed attached dwellings could generate 335 tons of solid waste per year. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for solid waste disposal. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18,2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 5 . . Recreation and Open Space As the proposed future land use plan and zoning designations will permit the development of up to 132 dwelling units, payment of a Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fee will be required. The amount of this fee is dependent on the number of developed units and will be addressed and paid during the site plan review process. V. IMPACT ON NATURAL ENVIRONMENT [Section 4-603.F.5.] Prior to development of the subject property, site plan approval will be required. At that time, the stormwater management system will be required to meet all City and Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) stormwater management criteria. Water quantity and quality will be controlled in compliance with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. As there are no wetlands on the subject site that could be impacted by future development, the natural environment will not be affected. VI. LOCATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES [Section 4-602 .F.6.] The district boundaries are appropriately drawn in regard to location and classifications of streets and ownership lines. The location of the proposedMHDR, Medium High Density Residential District boundaries are logical and consolidates this site into the appropriate zoning district. It will blend into the existing MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District to the north and east and the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District to the south. VII. CONSISTENCY OF DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITY REGULATIONS [Sections 2-1001.1. & 4-602.F.1. and .2.] The existing land use plan category and zoning district permits a density of five dwelling units per acre and an impervious surface ratio (ISR) of 0.6. The proposed Residential High (RH) land use category and MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District is more intensive and permits a density of 30 dwelling units per acre and an ISR of 0.85. The size of the subject site is 191,664 square feet in area. It exceeds the minimum lot area requirement of 15,000 square feet and minimum lot width requirement of 150 feet for attached dwellings in the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District. The proposed use of this property is consistent with the uses allowed in the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential zoning district and the site exceeds minimum lot size requirements. Approval of this land use plan amendment and zoning district designation does not guarantee the right to develop on the subject property. Transportation concurrency must be met, and the property owner will have to comply with all laws and ordinances in effect at the time development permits are requested. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 6 . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS An amendment of the FLUP from the Residential Low (RL) category to the Residential High (RH) category and a rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District for the subject site is requested. This 4.4 acre site exceeds the minimum requirements for the proposed use of the property as attached dwellings. The neighborhood is surrounded by multi- and single-family residential dwellings to the north, south, east and west. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The proposed Residential High (RH) Future Land Use classification and MHDR, Medium High Density Residential zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the following actions and conditions on the request: ACTIONS: 1. Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low Classification (RL) (County) to the Residential High (RU) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and 2. Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estates (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City) (pending ANX2004-03004). Prepared by Planning Department staff: Mark T. Parry, Planner Attachments: Application Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Land Use Plan Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Site Photographs S:\Planning DepartmentlC D EiLand Use AmendmentslLUZ 2004\LUZ2004-03002 2025 N Highland Bayshore Broadway, Inc\LUZ2004-03002 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18,2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 7 , GRIMSHAW, ARTHUR C GRIMSHAW, LINDA E 1555 UNION ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1361 . ALBERT, GEORGE F . ALBERT, BERTHA E 1551 UNION ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1361 LENNOX, FRANK T 1360 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR SHOR FL 33786 - 3352 EL AMIR OF TAMPA CO 2099 HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - NICHOLSON, D ANNE 870 VIRGINIA ST # 316 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - MC NEELY, MARY R NICHOLSON, D ANNE 2043 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1324 NICHOLSON, D A 870 VIRGINIA ST # 316 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6742 CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTH PO BOX 960 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0960 HILL, DAVID R 1995 BYRAM DR CLEARWATERFL33755 -1548 RIGGS, ADAM K DARLEY, STEVE PENT A, LISA A RIGGS, DORIS H DARLEY, PAMELA S 1981 BYRAM DR 1989 BYRAM DR 1985 BYRAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1548 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1548 CLEARWATER FL 33755- MORROW, RALPH H JANOCHA, MILDRED A ERICKSON, RAYMOND D MORROW, MELISSA J 1973 BYRAM CIR ERICKSON, NANCY E 1977 BYRAM DR CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 1503 1969 BYRAM CIR CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1548 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1503 BLAIR, A FRANK JR MAC CARL, G NEIL MAREADY, GEORGE C JR BLAIR, AUDREY M MAC CARL, MARY E 1992 BYRAM DR 1965 BYRAM CIR 103 HUDSON DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1508 CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1503 TORONTO ON M4T 2K4 00030- CANADA PARRISH, JAMES R FAISON, WILLIE G WILLIS, LUZ E INGLESE, CATHERINE L FAISON, ETHEL L 1476 BYRAM DR 1492 BYRAM DR 1482 BYRAM DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1504 ROGERS, RICHARD T EPSTEIN, HERMAN JACKSON, REGINALD E SR ROGERS, DAWN A EPSTEIN, LILLIAN JACKSON, FRANCIES R 1913 ASHLAND DR 1468 BYRAM DR 1974 SOUVENIR DR CLEARWATERFL 33763 - 2209 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1504 CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1533 DA VIS, MARIE C CARSON, LOUIS JR DE SOCIO, JULIE DA VIS, WILLIAM C CARSON, MARIE H DE SOCIO, CARMEN J SR 1550 SOUVENIR DR 1480 RIDGELANE RD 2017 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1634 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1263 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 STEINFELD, CLIFFORD B PITRUZZELLO, SEBASTIAN R MAUGER, PETER P 2023 PLATEAU RD PITRUZZELLO, DOLORES MAUGER, LESLIE S CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 2029 PLATEAU RD 2035 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1258 BAKER, MARK A 2039 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755- . DEWBERRY, RAYMOND D 2045 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 WALDRON, JPAUL WALDRON, VIOLET M 2057 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 LAMBERT, KATHY G 2063 PLA TEA U RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 GRANT, CONRAD B TRUST 6450 SEMINOLE BLVD SEMINOLE FL 33772- MARCANTONIO, KARIN A K 1478 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - .WALDRON,J PAUL WALDRON, VIOLET M 2057 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 BERNARD, DANIEL G BERNARD, KATHRYN E 2069 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1258 REESE, ROBERT A 2082 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1323 DEER, CHARLES D ARMSTRONG,OTHAJR CASPER, CALVIN DEER, KATHLEEN L ARMSTRONG, TAMMY L 2064 N HIGHLAND AVE 2076 N HIGHLAND AVE 2070 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1323 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1323 CLEARWATERFL 33755- SCOLES, ROBERT W II O'CONNOR, DOROTHY V ALAZQUEZ, BENJAMIN SCOLES, BARBARA E 2052 N HIGHLAND AVE V ALAZQUEZ, ZIT A 0 2058 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 1323 2046 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATERFL33755 -1323 CLEARWATERFL33755 -1323 GOLTZ, LORELEI L GRAHAM, GEORGE A HOWLAND, HOWARD E 1600 CLEVELAND ST 2036 N HIGHLAND AVE HOWLAND, BONITA J CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1323 2030 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1323 RUTLEDGE, DONALD L MAY, KIRBY GRAVES, PAUL T RUTLEDGE, LOUISE D 2018 N HIGHLAND AVE GRAVES, JUDITH A 2024 N HIGHLAND AVE CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1323 POBOX 2571 CLEARWATERFL33755 -1323 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 2571 UPPER PINELLAS ASSN FOR BRYANT, JANET P HEANEY, PAUL F RETARDED CITIZENS INC 1481 RIDGELANE RD HEANEY, MARION 0 1501 N BELCHER RD STE 249 CLEARWATERFL33755 -1262 1475 RIDGELANE RD CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1300 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1262 KALESKAS, GARY VENTO, JOSEPH DOMANICO, NANCY V MATTOCKS, DEBORAH VENTO, JANET PO BOX 2657 1471 RIDGELANE RD 1467 RIDGELANE RD LARGO FL 33779 - 2657 CLEARWATERFL 33755- CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1262 MA YNARD, CHARLES K FRIED, PATRICIA J MAC DONALD, HUGH R MAYNARD, DINA M 2024 PLATEAU RD 2030 PLATEAU RD 2018 PLEATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1257 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1257 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1257 ~ MARLEY, DONNA M . BRIDGES, DORIT A 2036 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1257 SAMUELS, JASON M SAMUELS, KRISTEN L 2052 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1257 TAVARES, CHRISTOPHER BRENNER, ARTHUR WEST 1467 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1256 BRADLEY, JANET L TRE 95 PROMENADE DR #101 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - RIGAKOS, JOHN SY, LOUELLA D 1470 RIDGELANE CIR N CLEARWATERFL33755 -1259 GMEINER, WAYNE J JR 1550 HUNTINGTON LN CLEARWATER FL 33755- MONDELLO, MARK GA VENDA, DAVID 1447 S HERCULES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 2531 JACOBSEN, OLIVER S III JACOBSEN, SHARON L 1550 CUMBERLAND LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1312 BA YSHOREIBROADW A Y INC. 221 TURNER STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 BROWNE, LINDSEY E . 2040 PLA TEA U RD--- CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1257 GARDNER, JOHN B 2058 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1257 ANDREI, GABRIEL ANDREI, DEOBRAH 1464 RIDGELANE RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1261 SCHEULLER, GEORGE V SCHEULLER, SANDRA J 26 W 136 JEROME AVE WHEATON IL 60187 - HOUSER, LEONARD J SR HOUSER, RUTH A 1555 HUNTINGTON LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1338 HAMILTON, SEAN 1556 HUNTINGTON LN CLEARWATERFL 33765- HAVENS, BRYAN D 1555 CUMBERLAND LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1313 MORSE, WILLIAM M MORSE, JEAN H 1556 CUMBERLAND LN CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1312 ALEX PANIK, THOM WILKES, GEOFFREY WEBER 39326 U.S. HWY 19 NORTH TARPON SPRINGS 34689 ROWLAND, STEVEN C ROWLAND, TERRI K 2046 PLA TEA U RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1257 REYES, FERNANDO A REYES, DESERAE 2064 PLATEAU RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1257 WALLACE, DOUGLAS R 1461 RIDGELANE CIR S CLEARWATER FL 33755 - SMITH, JON D SMITH, MARY J 1461 RIDGELANE CIR N CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1259 DENZ, MICHAEL R DENZ, MARY JO 1549 HUNTINGTON LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1338 LEONARD, JANICE L LEONARD, ANGUS A 1562 HUNTINGTON LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 -1337 PRZYWARA, JANIS M 1549 CUMBERLAND LN CLEARWATERFL 33755 -1313 MACKLEY, JOYCE L MACKLEY, JOHN R PO BOX 4388 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4388 (\J IS) "- Q,J 0... If) L!) .,.; '" <;J" UJ '" ['- 0J ['- Network: Level Of Service _. .--- ..- -_. _... u _Base f\I1aly~isFil~:_ _NJAu . . _ . Arlalysis File: f2006 (2002 E+C) 8SB, HIGHLAND AV: (SUNSET POINT RD.to-UNION ST) Id CnS~eel LengllWilas tanes <>IldLi'nil Juris FromNo:I~ Pe:fSlj Ty~ Sig1clCl O1151n1 T()'lode ?>mull Area %Tu'T'.& O1l5in2 37~O HIGHLANDM SUNSET POINr RD UNION 57 .S10 o 1 , U 2 35 I. 12.( C~ N.I.... NI'A r.cJ Z Z Z <I -l 0... )- I- Z :::J o U (JJ <I -l -l l.LJ Z - 0- (J) '" .. IS) .,.; '" IS) IS) (\J I ['- r;J ct: 0- <I Notes; Melhoci Ii = HCS, r = ra~IL'S, A = AFCoIc.CU ('.AFT: 1 =Freeway, 2=I,1l Flew Ar';er.al. 3=Urban -lAuIU, 4= r wola1~ Urint Fn". ~= ~lffiStale, Miiocr &.reel, 6=r-kll LIsOO, 1=R1raI Multi, 8= r "'''-cllr.e Unnl. Flow Tindale.Otiver ano' Ass;ciates. Inc., Tampa, ft, Level of Service Inventorv Reoort (TOA Format} -. \ 1"1:,,1\ I fVYI LlUV~L1Vll"l I Pinel/as County MPO TI MAS 2002 -...-- "r ------!- ; N'A 2006 HCS Method Sour-:>e M I C'!'F7 Multo;! C,'elen 'to F~'1ol Pk'Wd KfOC!:Or Sec~iJ Sa:Fle'N GCRaUv S'tGC VPIoT p(HrCirVoI D,~oct.Jr SeqN.:l PIiF FkH~y'HI Time N,'A ',5.2C(l 2 A 2 100 NIl>. )1,'A. 1.444 .(t;I5 85tl 1,5(/) .52 WI>. ~C6 794 5S .9,,-> lB 1l~.1 t\.,~ {i( e~t; LOS Calc Method .!UUi truu I J (\J IS) 0... -l a I- o I- So~u~y: Facility 10 . Reporl Date: 4J22'2004 _ Report Time: 12:36:01 PM Tables Method WtdPkCir Prd la1GCl WljP\<.Vo; Prd J~ris Wt.l.v..or Frd!<tea a a Cl Q 2 Segment Data Spoo:l LQ& S'icCap PI>:,Cap Vs~iilio VcR.tio 22.60 C 850 m .~~ HI; Faci1ily Oata SpeW LOS S'.tCop FhyC.p ',lsR;;lb VcR.tio . 2"2.<;3 C &53 186 93 ;.01 '. Arrrype: l~Verr Poor. 2='Jnfa\'()ra~I~, 3=ila"&.m', bF8',l>1tJIe, 5-Htghly F",'()~, E.=Ex.~!i:lna DrIT~;lil: 1 =1>c,J<J.a:J, ~'=Se-ri-Aclu,,~, J=Fi><ld. Time .~rea: '~CBD. 2=Scl>Jroar. 3= 1 rd'iSi~Ciling, 4=RJrai Ce,{i{)ped, ~.= ~Jrai P~Hr\l1-tr ls ~ase1 co ~ difecliJn of Ifad ~Iy. When L~e 'ds,t,.- or '~~ll'w~. remun!; ()1:0n is cI101il::', ire j:e<lk !lev 'v'H; Iha; is ''e9Cr.~, islhc J:Wk 'k......~ pe:J( di~>Jn VH, ai~idoo Il'J ne OFaclcf. -1 (\J CSJ "- ..-l n... If) If) "..., 'l" 'l" Ul 'l" ['- (\J ['- ~ Z - Z Z IT -' n... >- I- Z ::J o U (J) IT ..J ..J W Z ~ n... ['- 'l" lSI ..-l 'l" lSI lSI (\J I ['- f\J I G:: (L IT level of Service Inventorv ReDort lTOA Format) .. j.:J ,) '. \let U:, if \ \'~? LOS Calc Method ,}ij 4""'7' . b , r\. _ _.. 11 _ . ... ""!_... _..~ _ _ _I " \ . '"''''''' I ...".... _u""V,t""f.''''' I '<'UUL. II LJV I J Pinellas County MPO TIMAS 2002 Network: Level Of Service .~ .-.... ..-. --...-- . ..---. BaseAn~lys!sFjle:Base ?OQ2 Analysis File: NIA 2002 N/A Sort By: F acility!D Report Date: 4/22/2004 .. . "...... ___. ____ _n._ . Repolt Time: 1 :09:22 PM 856. HIGHLAND AV: (SUNSET POINT RD -to-VIRGINIA AVl HCS Mell10d Tables Melf10d Segment Data facility Data kJ 01SIr~e( Ler.glhM,es Unss SpdLi'11lL Juris Soucce MDT CNT MenJd :'r10ass %tlO~.S5 CycLen SrCyc "o'IldP\<Dir Prj LansCL Sr-j ,_OS Sp:lCd LOS I Fr::rnNocle "~rISb::I T;'~ Si;)nalCl ChlSln1 Fy'lcl PkHrVol K~oc'f.lr SecN(} S31F1J'1I OrIT)'?e GCRa10 SrcGS 1'.\.dPk"oJd Prd Juris S-o'CCl'p P1~'Ca,J S~l.~C~p F~i'CEp loNode PsmJII Area \(,f ums ChlSln2 '.'MT PkHrOi(y'ol DFaclc{ Scqtlo PHF Air' ype Pl<.llr'/HT H'ne 1',1!iilJ,Dl Pnf Area VsRa10 VcRalkJ '.lsRa~o VcRiio 175~ 1::(;:lLJ.,HD AV .S10 2 26 CL N,'A lE.,~~ 2 A 2 0.03 120 ~l(A 0 1 6.41) F E.31.l SU~lS-:.T POINT RD D U @ tllA I,','A 1,3SJ '391 85~ 19:N 2 .46 ~lrA 0 CR 4;;xJ f~5 4.\1 E '^ """ UMCN S. 1 2 IliA 41)2 7119 .~.7 . .925 4 03 2aO.2 0 2 U3 1.15 '..Sil 1 21 , mo PAlRIC'.~ "'-V.'HIGHLANQ .430 :; 35 Ctl N''!' 15m' 2 A 2 o.ao lCO _'li,to. 0 1 227a C G.3J F L'NICN 0 U 0 /l.'A N.'A 1,~15 .C~1 1156 1,!l1:O 2 WJ ~I,'A 0 CR 42J 1,614 4p) 6t;E SCOTSDALE ST 1 :1 . 12(}~ t;I,~ ~f 8n .57 2 .9e7 E '.5 59.2 I) :; ,.91 0.53 l.~B 1.22 2141 PA mlC[,!" AVi HIGkl.M~D .c9) 2 35 ON Nit.. ;5,550 2 A 2 D.ell j2() IliA 0 ~ 11~ F 6.30 F SCarSDALE ST D 'J 1 r':.'A Nit.. 1,415 .fm B56 1,ro) 2 AO /lo'A 0 CR 42~' 64€ m 646 SEL TREES 8T 1 2 12..J() N..A 7;:' !lD7 .57 3 .EO? 4 ~ 28SB a 2 1.3l 1.2~ 1.SE 1.L2 21)) PA TAlCIA A'/.iHIGHtmD .523 2 35 011 N,'A M,H.) 2 A 2 0.00 18) t\IA a 1 6.';0 F 6,:!t, F VIRG!tM AV D U 1 lol'''' Nt'/>. 1.l&l .0'31 BS6 1,003 2 .41) ~"IA 'J C~ t20 6EO .:2C, 6~6 BEL TREES ST 1 2 12.CO N';; 382 l~ .51 4 ,001 4 53 2841 J 2 1J5 1.13 1.et 1.22 2123 PA ,RClA AV,HIGHLJ.ND .<13[' 2 35 Dr~ tl,'A 11,7\""9 2 A 2 C'.OJ 12C M'.~ ij 1 7AO F 530 ~AiH 81 D [; 'c N,',to. t~,'A 1,162 .Og1 a56 ~,9:r. 2 to f.J.'), y' CR 4.11 M9 420 646 ..J '/IRGlt, A "Ii 1 2 12.00 NIA 285 €/:i2 57 51 .931 4 38 Z09.l 0 2 1.5a U02 l.r;il 1.22 . Nores: Method: Ii = f-;:S, 1 = F ;;/:i~. A = A~::;ac.OLl C.~FT: l=Free,,'a,'. i=lnt FII)'I, Melia, 3=Ur~;;n \,lulU, 4=Tv.rrLfI'".e Unint FICMo, ~=N~-Sta':e, Mirm Streellj=t~Oi: Use:!, 7=~ra \!u!li, E= Two-La1. Unir,;. FiCM' Hndafe.Otiver and Associates, Inc" Tampa, Ft. '. ArrTyw l:"Jay Poo; 2=!Jrof<l','Orablc, 3=Raroom. 4=FJ,'Ofa3le, ~=H{lnll' Favmb'e. f=Ex:;.e~ti:i"aI 0'jT)'p.;: 1=kilar.ed, 2=Semi.,~,::Jua".ed. 3=':i>:ed- TIT.t' AJer'l 1 =CBD. ,,:S~!}Jmu. 3= 1 riO(S;~c.1~1~, 4=Rurai De-..eioped. 5= RJ.,'3~ F1lHrV~r is base:! en pea~ direr-!;)n 01 1r3\'el ({Iy. \';~e'llhe 'd~;.y' or .t\loO.....3y. re!X'1irg opli,n is che~e<l, Ire pea'~ nc:t~ 'y"F It.al is ~e;>'r1~, ;s~.e ~~ 'Y.Iur p&ao: direclk:r. VH"f C:'~~ej t'l ,'1a DF<Y.:~,(. -1 -- ~Nfl,~W~ - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: October 19, 2004 AGENDA ITEM NO. Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D Public Hearing D County Administrator's Sianature: Subiect: Proposed Regular Amendment to the Countywide Land Use Plan. Department: Planning Department Staff Member Responsible: Brian K. Smith, Director Recommended Action: IT IS RECOMMENDED THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SITTING AS THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY, TAKE ACTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL (PPC) RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND GIVE THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO THE PPC FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. Summary Explanation/Backaround: Case #CW 04-35 is a submittal by the City of Clearwater. This is a 4.4-acre proposal located on the east side of Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road. This is the area just south of Union Street. The proposal is to go from Residential Low (up to 5 units an acre) to Residential High (up to 30 units an acre) with a Water Drainage Feature Overlay. The PPC has made a recommendation of denial without prejudice. The Board originally took up this case as the CPA at its August 10, 2004 meeting. At that time, the developer requested a continuance to allow them the opportunity to develop an agreement that would limit the number of units per acre to less than 30 units an acre, as called for in the category. The developer's intent was to limit the number to 22 units per acre for the project. It was the developer's intent to then be able to provide this alternative to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board took action to continue the matter for 60 days. The case has now been brought back to the CPA for action. Since the case was not taken back to the PPC and only continued, the original PPC recommendation remains the same, which is denial without prejudice. County staff recommends that the Board take action to concur with the PPC recommendation of denial without prejudice. Fiscallmpact/CostlRevenue Summary: None Revised 07-18-03 Page 1 of 2 Exhibits/Attachments Attache_ Council Documentation/Resolution e . Revised 07-18-03 Page 2 of 2 -- ~lud A~. - - un --''-------------e--- -) ORDINANCE NO. 04-71 ~uV 1;5 2[104 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LANb: USE PLAN OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON: CASE NUMBER CW 04-35 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, a proposed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, which is an element of the Countywide- Comprehensive Plan of Pinellas County, Florida, has been presented at a public hearing to the Board of County Commissioners in their capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority; and >,c: :;; rr:;~_ ~ WHEREAS, notices and advertisements of public hearings have been acc~lis~ as=n -, ~ ):>0 ...", ....... required by Chapter 73-594, Laws of Florida, as amended; and ~~ ~ r rt1 !7"' ~ :l:a m WHEREAS, procedures of the Special Act and COlmty Charter have be~~ollt;We~ concerning the Pinellas Planning Council and the Countywide Planning Authority €~ro~ed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater initiated a proposed amendment which was considered at a public hearing by the Pinellas Planning Council on July 21, 2004, with recommendation made by the Council that is documented in the Council report referred to as Attaclunent A; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted a public hearing and taken action that is documented by ordinance for approvals or partial approvals and partial denials and by resolution for denials, with both documents including the relevant Council reports as attached. e - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, acting as the Countywide Plmming Authority in regular meeting duly assembled on October 19,2004, as follows: Section I - Amending the CountyWide Future Land Use Plan The Countywide Future Land Use Plan for Pinellas County adopted in Section 3(a) of Ordinance 89-4 is amended to reflect the change adopted as follows: #CW 04-35 4.4 acres generally located on the east side of North Highland Avenue at the eastern terminus of Ridgelane Road, from Residential Low and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay to Residential High and Water/Drainage Feature Overlay, subject to the filing of a restrictive covenant with Pinellas County that restricts the permitted density on the subject property to a rpaximum of 22 dwelling units per acre. The restrictive covenant shall run with the land. Section 2 - Severability If any Section, Subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction, such holding shall not be construed to render the remaining provisions of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3 - Filing of Ordinance: Effective Date A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Secretary of State with the Ordinance and Attachment" A" to be filed with Clerk of the Circuit Court. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. ---e e 'J STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I, KARLEEN F. De BLAKER, Clerk of the Circuit Court and Ex-officio Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the State and County aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of an Ordinance adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, on October 19, 2004 relative to: ORDINANCE NO. 04-71 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON CASE NUMBER CW 04-35 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AND TRANSMITTED TO THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ACT; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal this 26th day of October 2004. "". '!J, t .:. " KARLEENF.DeBLAKER Clerk of the Circuit Court And Ex-officio Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners , " ~i ,", ; '~Fi A . 'J)' ", ,Ii" ,:" c, . '~ r ~ " .~ ': (SE4L " r<+,,-r .... .-.""-, . ~ (";' ::: " . ' '!t .. By: ~-4aC2J71_ Linda R. Reed, Deputy Clerk '<~, <{ ,!;~'~\:r~ri~JE~j~~i~-,~, "'j' ''I''. -0, '" :;_ ';;';.;;:'.,\' I ~1~::""'-'''' ~ ~,~~..> ~-!~/5i;~..r:1l'\ ~ '~ l.!","",)-=:L_.=, ~.'1 ~r::l ~~ ;~~.-'''~._w _~" "VA~--"-- "r~" ":~JA;C;~;~~""~'\)1.~' ~#,~L5~'pjl~ . . CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 June 21,2004 Mr. David P. Healey, AICP Executive Director Pinellas Planning Council 600 Cleveland Street, Suite 850 Clea~5-4l60 RE: L1 TTJnnLl 030m, LUZ2004-03003 and Beach by Design - Application to Amend the Countywide Future Land Use Plan Dear. Mr. Healey: The City of Clearwater requests the following: 1. An amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan to change RL land use to RH of three parcels of land totaling 4.4 acres for property located at 2025 North Highland Avenue; 2. An amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan to change RU land use to RlOS of land totaling 36.6-acres for property located at 2950 Glen Oak Avenue; and 3. An amendment to Beach by Design. These amendments were passed on first reading at the June 17, 2004 City Commission meeting. Attached please find all of the required information for this request. If you need any additional information, please contact me at 727-562-4558. Sincerely, ~-- .// -.-' Mark T. Parry Planner BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, CO:\IMISSIONER FRANK Hl!lIlARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.LjONSON, COM~lISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . ,r Attachments: Staff Maps Staff Reports Email from Paul Bertels, Manager Traffic Operations Division outlining correction in the MOP's LOS for North Highland Avenue between Sunset Point Road and Union Street for Ordinance no. 7300-04 Ordinance no. 7300-04 Ordinance no. 7304-04 S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D EILand Use AmendmentslLUZ 20041LUZ2004-03002 2043 N. Highland1PPCILUZ2004-03002 PPC I~ 1 'Zq~'dr Transmittalltr.doc h Z:" "-l....'.'..-I...._..,'_......'J~~ . APPLICATION FOR CiNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND U~E PLAN AMENDMENT Please complete all the information belo\', ., accurately as possible to ensure that the apptllon for the land use plan amendment can be processed efficiently. Processing of the application will not be started until this form has been completed. If additional space is . needed, please number and attach additional sheets. 1. Countywide FLUP Map Amendment Information 1. Current Countywide FLUP Designation RL RH 2. Proposed Countywide FLUP Designation II. Local Plan Map Amendment Information 1. Local Plan Map Amendment Case Number LUZ2004-03002 2. Current Local Plan Designation(s) RUCOUNTY 3. Current Local Zoning Designation(s) A-E/COUNTY RH MHDR 4. Proposed Local Plan Designation(s) 5. Proposed Local Zoning Designation(s) III. Site Description 1. Parcel number(s) of area(s) proposed to be amended 02129/15/00000/210/0600 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 (include Section/Twp/Rng/Sub/Blk/Lot) 2. Acreage 3. Location 4.4 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND A VENUE TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS TWO DWELLING UNITS BA YSHORE BROADWAY. INC. 4. Existing use 5. Existing density 6. Name of project (if applicable) IV. Verification of Local Action 1. Verification of local action to approve amendment to local plan and transmittal of amendment to Countywide Plan Map; and/or copy of local ordinance proposing/approving plan amendment authorizing request for amendment of Countywide Plan Map. V. Other Pertinent Information 1. Submittal letter from the local jurisdiction to the Executive Director requesting amendment to the Countywide FLUP. x 2. Disclosure of Interest Statement with names and addresses of the application! representative and property owner. x 3. Proposed local ordinance number and status. x X 4. Staff report and local action to date. 5. Attach local plan and zoning maps. X 6. Include proposed demarcation line for environmentally sensitive areas (if applicable). X 7. Legal description. X 8. Map clearly indicating amendment location. X 9. Plan Amendment Application. X S:\Planning DepartmenflC D B\Land Use Amendments\LUZ 2004\LUZ2004-03002 2043 N. Highlancf..PPC\LUZ2004-03002 PPC FLUP APPLICA TION. doc . . DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST STATEMENT PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL CASE NUMBER * ,~ SUBMITTING GOVERNMENT ENTITY: CITY OF CLEARWATER PPC OR CITY/TOWN CASE NUMBER: LUZ2004-03002 PROPERTY OWNERS: BA YSHORE BROADWAY, INe. REPRESENTATIVE: MR. ALEX PANIK PANIK ENGINEERING, INC. 39326 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH TARPON SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34689 ANY OTHER PERSONS HAVING ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: Interests: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin & Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Contingent: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Upon Annexation, Land Use Amendment, & Rezoning of Property. Absolute: Name: Specific Interest Held: INDICATION AS TO WHETHER A CONTRACT EXISTS FOR SALE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY, IF SO: Yes Contract is: Same as Above Contingent: Same as Above Absolute: All Parties To Contract: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin & Bayshore Broadway, Inc. Name: INDICATION AS TO WHETHER THERE ARE ANY OPTIONS TO PURCHASE SUBJECT PROPERTY, IF SO: No All Parties To Option: Name: Name: ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION WHICH APPLICANT MAY WISH TO SUBMIT PERTAINING TO REQUESTED PLAN AMENDMENT: * NUMBER TO BE ASSIGNED BY PLANNING COUNCIL STAFF S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BILand Use AmendmentslLUZ 2004\LUZ2004-03002 2043 N. Highland\PPC\LUZ2004-03002 PPC DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.doc . . ...'/ 1 CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Leonard Chetkin and Mary Chetkin. APPLICANT: Bayshore Broadway, Inc. REPRESENTATIVE: Alex Panik (Panik Engineering, Inc.) LOCATION: 2025 North Highland Avenue. REQUEST: (a) Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low (RL) Classification (County) to Residential High (RR) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and (b) Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City of Clearwater) (pending ANX2004-03004). SITE INFORMATION PROPERTY SIZE: 191,664 square feet or 4.4 acres DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 567 feet wide by 287 feet deep PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Single-family dwellings Multi-family dwellings PLAN CATEGORY: Current Category: Proposed Category: Residential Low (RL) (County) Residential High (RR) (City) Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18,2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 1 . . the concurrency management system to allow services to be upgraded concurrently with the impacts of development. 'r 16.1 Objective - Assure an adequate supply of housing in Clearwater by providing for additional new dwelling units in a variety of types, costs, and locations to meet the needs of the residents of the City of Clearwater. The proposed plan amendment is not in conflict with any Clearwater Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives or Policies, and is consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. II. CONSISTENCY WITH COUNTYWIDE PLAN The purpose of the proposed Residential High (RH) category, as specified in Section 2.3.3.3.1 of the Countywide Rules, is to depict those areas of the County that are now developed, or appropriate to be developed, in a highly intensive residential manner; and to recognize such areas as primarily well-suited for residential uses that are consistent with the urban and intensive qualities, transportation facilities and natural resource characteristics of such areas. The Residential High (RH) category is generally appropriate to locations within or in close proximity to urban activity centers; in areas where use and development characteristics are high density residential in nature; and in areas serving as an urban center. These areas are typically in close proximity to and may have direct access from the arterial and thoroughfare highway network and are served by mass transit in a manner that provides an alternative to individual automobile use. This designation is generally not appropriate for coastal high hazard and evacuation level "A" areas. The proposed use of the property for a townhome development is consistent with the purposes of the Residential High (RR) category. The site is adjacent to property currently used for high density residential purposes and is located along a major arterial, North Highland Avenue. The site is also located in close proximity to Sunset Point Road, another major arterial. The proposed plan amendment is consistent with the purpose and loeational characteristics of the Countywide Plan. III. COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTY/CHARACTER OF THE CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD [Section 4-602.F.2 & 4-603.F.3] Primarily single- and multi-family dwellings characterize North Highland Avenue, between Union Street and Sunset Point Road. There are a variety of non-residential uses located farther to the north ofthe site at the southeast comer of North Highland Avenue and Union Street. Offices and retail uses are located at the southeast and west comers of North Highland Avenue and Sunset Point Road. Residential High (RR) future land use is located to the north and east of the site, while Residential Low (RL) future land use is located farther to the north of the site. Residential High (RR) dominates the land use to the north and east of the property while Residential Urban (RU) land use is located to the west and south. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 3 . . .. Specific uses in the current and proposed zoning districts have also been analyzed for the level of vehicle trips that could be generated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Manual. Existing Zoning/Future Land Use Plan 22 dwelling units N/A N/A Townhome/Condo (5.86 trips/dwelling unit) Proposed Zoning/Future Land Use Plan 132 dwelling units 132 dwelling units 774 563 71 49 Apartments (6.63 trips/dwelling unit) 875 664 88 66 The City of Clearwater Engineering Department has concluded based on the traffic impact study provided by the applicant that the transportation impacts associated with this land use plan amendment are minimal and will not degrade the LOS of Highland Avenue. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the increase in PM peak trips will have no impact on the operational efficiency of the signalized intersections within this segment of Highland Avenue. Mass Transit The Citywide LOS for mass transit will not be affected by the proposed plan amendment. The total miles of fixed route service will not change; the subject site is located along an existing transit route and headways are less than or equal to one hour. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) bus service is available along North Highland Avenue. Water The current FLUP category could use up to 5,500 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, water demand could approach approximately 33,000 gallons per day. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for water. Wastewater The current FLUP category could produce up to 4,400 gallons per day. Under the proposed FLUP category, sewer demand could approach approximately 26,400 gallons per day. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for wastewater. Solid Waste The current Residential Low FLUP category would result in the production of 56 tons of solid waste per year. Under the proposed FLUP category, the proposed attached dwellings could generate 335 tons of solid waste per year. The proposed land use will not negatively affect the City's current LOS for solid waste disposal. Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 5 . . SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS An amendment of the FLUP from the Residential Low (RL) category to the Residential High (RH) category and a rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estate District to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District for the subject site is requested. This 4.4 acre site exceeds the minimum requirements for the proposed use of the property as attached dwellings. The neighborhood is surrounded by multi- and single-family residential dwellings to the north, south, east and west. The proposed future land use plan amendment and rezoning is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The proposed Residential High (RH) Future Land Use classification and MHDR, Medium High Density Residential zoning district is consistent with both the City and the Countywide Comprehensive Plans, is compatible with the surrounding area, does not require nor affect the provision of public services, is compatible with the natural environment and is consistent with the development regulations of the City. Based on the above analysis, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the following actions and conditions on the request: ACTIONS: 1. Land Use Plan amendment from the Residential Low Classification (RL) (County) to the Residential High (RU) Classification (City) (pending ANX2004-03004); and 2. Rezoning from the A-E, Agricultural Estates (County) to the MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District (City) (pending ANX2004-03004). Prepared by Planning Department staff: Mark T. Parry, Planner .-----.-=:=:> Attachments: Application Location Map Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Land Use Plan Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Site Photographs S:\Planning DepartmentlC D EILand Use AmendmentslLUZ 2004\LUZ2004-03002 2025 N Highland Bayshore Broadway, Inc1LUZ2004-03002 Staff Report doc Staff Report - Community Development Board ~ May 18, 2004 - Case LUZ2004-03002 Page 7 . . From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 11 :20 AM To: Parry, Mark Subject: FW: Highland Avenue LOS Corrections I believe I sent this to you before, but please make sure this is in the file. You will need to include this in our submission to PPC. -----Original Message----- From: Bertels, Paul Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 9:45 AM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: Highland Avenue LOS Corrections The section of Highland Avenue between Union Street and Sunset Point Road was listed as LOS F in the 2003 LOS Report published by the MPO. Thiswas due to the fact that the inputs into the computer model for this section omitted the left turn and right turn lanes at Union Street which is the PM Peak Hour Direction. When values were inputted into those fields the corrected LOS came out as LOS C. It is important to note that the sections of Highland Avenue/Patricia Avenue to the north also went from an F to a D due to the improvements that are currently underway in Dunedin which involve the widening of Patricia Avenue to 3 lanes from 2 lanes. This should result in this segment of Patricia Avenue from Union Street to S.R. 580 being removed from the constrained corridor list in the next Countywide Concurrency Test Statement. Paul Bertels Manager Traffic Operations Division 727-562-4794 Paul.Berte/s@MyClearwater.com . ORDINANCE NO.7301-04 . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY ZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MHDR); PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the assignment of a zoning district classification as set forth in this ordinanc~ is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensi~e plan; now, therefore, I i BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property located in Pinellas County, Florida, is hereby zoned as ind icated upon' annexation into the City of Clearwater, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended, as follows: Property See legal description attached hereto. (LUZ2004-03002) Zoninq District Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) Section 2. The City Engineer is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7299-04. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor Appr9ved as to form: \ /) (;/')'1-' '4_/' .- J -. t.... (, .', I 1/ 'J/-., , . /. I I / // iI/ i.' to'....,. -'kJji.l~(//- ,.flt/ /" .~! i~ ,,-{""-'. ,"',': /\ ~-:"_, .-' ~ '-'-'.", - .-.=-,... LeSlie K. Doug'all-Sjd~s -, Assistant City Attorne'y Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7301-04 '" --, .._:~I I I _, " I 1._;' :_____: OJ ... . ..- ~ ; ~- . ... - : ",- , _____1 ~""--_-- ,20tU ~ -- I , ' 1- __~ __: i'2058 ..., ". , , :-----' : :_Og? , , 1__ _J :- -:r~ . I , ,- , , 1_... , ~--204'O ~ ...! . , :m203~ I., ,I ~ - llMcI I I , " . . :-2008 I , I I , , , . .-'" ---, I ..--. I ;. '__.. :___Ig: ~ :!; '------:! . .- , 0 Ii) _.. I ~_I I_.! , - 20[5_ __: 2/169 - . , l.; I _, :... -... ~ ~b6j: , " , , , ,- tf57 :_, , , , I 2051 ~ ):. nt :b c: ~ o 2(l45; , , I , I , '-.. _, . " 2~~ ... _: 2Q'35- ... ~ I ...-. , I , , 26T:Z1T ... -. . 0 I -- I , L. __"- 2~~-:_. I . . ,- l_... _, $11-- ; '-. : I I '-.. -, .-----"; I I 0.-. - I co --- :'; RIDGELANE RD '" :m..~ o I I I'"' I L -;_ .!'_... n, ~ ..~ ---:.'!o. :-- ., ---_: ~____I-' -----.. , . --......~ "..i1. ~ ,_..----, I , :.._-~ ~ ,- '" :-----. -, I I 00 0 ~ -~...., .-'- --~ , "' Ou n ~ ;:: ," r-:!'; I o I I '" ... 00 ___I~ ;-~_I_~ : r I 0, '" I ?"i_! --;--"~ , I .. ... -'e __I :! , , ,. , ' -:~l!~b , " -, ' 1064 ~ ,....... -. , , , I I , , , ,.. -' L .. ~I I I I .. -oo~ ::----: I ,-. :-~6 .---, , , o ". : 2~ ,_........ ., I , I I L ... _2~6 . ---, I 0 o I .~..... _~OjO ,-----, :_- ,: : 2~24 j --: .' , I 0 :... _2918 ,., .-'" ---I .'0 . ~I---"" a; --.--~ o --, : !..- ...' o o '" I '" , ~-_.. .. BYRAM DR ... ... :--~:--I . I ..... -' 1_- _' It) ~------: '-, : --, I L.. _' -~_:-: I 0 I 0 \_-_...-~ :_~q76 l_ __I 2075 ,-" -, , . , I I , . I . I , I . I , I o I 'h : - _.. - ~_ ... .. _... .. - ... ... I - -.... ~ '- --- ------ --- ---..__: ,- . I I , , , -' .__r- -___.. __ ___ ,__.__ , I , . 1_ _.... - - - - -.. - -......._... ~ :--~~ L._.._~ :-'--, ~__I-~ .- -- i........... ~ o , I I , 0 . I I , , , I I :_-----' ,- - -"-, , I I I ~____J rOo -. I I , , , I . , I , , I I I I , , I I . , I :- -~ ,--I ,--__, ___ . t:rl. I _, , U'), t..._ " ,--~ ~' ~, ~ !! -, 19~ .' , I I -, , , . I:J-96~ Zoning Map Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-03002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size(Acres): Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From: RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR Atlas Page: 252A ,- -- I . , , , I , . I 206;;" n_ __, I I , I I I o , I '-_____1 .-" .. ... .. .. - .. - - - - .. - -- .. - .. ........ I : I --______-------_______1 ------------ , I I I . .-----______1 HDR .-- -.. - --.. --.. -- --... -- --- ------: ,..... ........ ... -.. - - - -..... -... .. ... -. .. .. ~ r--- I I . . o I , I 1- __~ ~- --, . I I I 0 '- ---. ,------------ I 0 o 0 '------------, :- --~ : '... : " o I 0 I 0 0 I '.--------------~ I : : ~------------_! : '__'" 1__, 1-- --- --- ----- ----.---- - --I I , :---. -- - --- ---- - - -- .---- ---' . --. .- - . o on :- -~ _! Ordinance No. 7301-04 . ORDINANCE NO. 7300-04 . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY, TO DESIGNATE THE LAND USE FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET NORTH OF SUNSET POINT ROAD, CONSISTING OF A PORTION OF METES AND BOUNDS 21/06, 21/07, AND 21/08, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, WHOSE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 2025 NORTH HIGHLAND AVENUE UPON ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS RESIDENTIAL HIGH; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The future land use plan element of the comprehensive plan of the City of Clearwater is amended by designating the land use category for the hereinafter described property, upon annexation into the City of Clearwater, as follows: Property See legal description attached hereto. (LUZ2004-03002) Land Use Cateaorv Residential High Section 2. The City Council does hereby certify thatthis ordinance is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of Ordinance No. 7299-04. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Brian J. Aungst Mayor AP~Gved as to formj--'-- / _. /", i / ' -""J' I 1/\" ,( C' 1/" . .I .' t- -' . " /' k :z ,/"." _''',1- y:.,LJ( ( ( .~x, It t t\t{.x "-r L Leslie K. Dougall-Sides ) Assistant City Attorney, Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Ordinance No. 7300-04 --, , , ,,_ ;1 '" _:~l -: , , Ol .... _..-~ i~-.--: .,.t...... 1 -----, !.._'----- ,20fJ4 ~.. - : : ' - --I : "'205~ " , , , ..-----, : 2_0?1l , , , , ,-- -, :- -ZrkfJ . , , ,- , , 1_ _I ~--204D , ' . . , :- - -;036: . -, , , ~ : ;- -M.1eJ :_- .~ , , i-2OO8 " , , , , , . , .-----, , ..--, I ~ '__.. :-_...~ : ~ ~ .._----~ , .- , , <D . ~_.. ~_.! RIDGELANE RD 01 r.l .... ,---..\2 --, ;0. .--'-~ . ~ ----.. .... fl" I ~-;_P_! ----: ~---_.- .... -.- , -, , , , , , , , , ..A- --~ , . '" '----~ " 20[5_ _ _: 2PW-' I L: , -, :-.. - ~ ,063:_ , ' ~--( $57: , -, , , , -' 2051 "0 r- :b ~ :b c: ~ P4S~ , , , , , , , . :_~q76 , , 1-' I l_:~~~ , , , - ~064r ,... --, . , , , , , , , ,_ _I .., ;,:1 ,1 ,- .;/05'2 ,..-"" -, ,- ' I ':," :- .ooJ6 .---, , , I ~_, :_--~~ ,-" -.., , , , , : 20~6 , ---, . , . , " --I ~ __ _:.D::l0 j-----I , : 1_.. , : 2(j24 ;- --I ..I " , , :__2P18 .-. .-- ---, '0 . ~I___..J 0; - - .-' j': --, : '-- -' __ i-Iii , " .. __ce .. , . Of . Ol . !---- :.R -, ~~-_: 1135-- ; I "-, , , , ' 2rn!T - -, , . I .: :..-.. ..~ 2~~-:_, , , . ,- ,.... I :1fW-f , . '___1 .-----, . , ~_.. I co --- :!; ... OJ :::J t-~~~j '., '" , ~i_~ BYRAM DR '" ~_.. -- --, - ' 1_, : .. -, I " --' -!-;-: , , . , \_~---~ 2075 :__-- '"______ __ _1--.._, :- ------ --- --- ---,,-_: , , , , '-' ,-.' ----- --- --- .--'--1 , ' l__.------~--.--~ 1 ---, , , , , , , , , , I-----~ , . . . , , . , . , , . , , :______1 ,-----, , . , , ~---_.! r --, , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , . , . , , ,- -.. , , . --, :-_.~ I.-..._J ;--'--- : -~ ,,--' .-- - . ,-- - , , , , , , , . , , 2~_____, . , , , , . . , , , . , , . , . .... --- ...-. .-------p--------------- , , ~-------------- ' . ! IJ6S, , " -, , . , ,:l~~ Future Land Use Map Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-03002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size(Acres): Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR Atlas Page: 252A :---n----RH-------- : t .. I . , I . , I ' t ~----------- ,-----------, i- -,. ------..- - --- -- ---- -----. :- - -' - - - - -...' -- - - - -,. - ...--... -,-_: r--" . ' , . , . . ' '- --; ,..-...-, , , , , 1_ ___, ~ :s G) :r: r- :b ~ :b iii ,-----.------ . ' :..._---------_: . " , . ,-- --- ---------.. . ~----------_..._! : . , 1__. 1-" -... - -- - --- -- - -- --- - - - ---, , . :_ _ _p - - - - - - -_ __ _ ___i- - -- ---' ,--, :-- I . g '--,,-~ Ordinance No. 7300-04 Aerial Photograph Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-G3002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size Acres): Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From: RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR A tlas Page: 252A Dunedin !Ii 1M PROJECT SITE Dunedin r '" (j I!l I!l I!l I!l I!l RMNSEND Sf I I ~ THA~S ST I ~ lHffiEy Sf SN<DY LA c=Jli1c=J .....,. L AD c=J c=J TERIlAQ; IV c:=J c=J _ Sf Location Map Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2oo4-03oo2 Site: 2025 North Highland A venue 4.4 Land Use Zoning 02/29/15/??oo0/210/0600 From: RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR Atlas Page: 252A ~ --.I. _.-~, ~. ,I; -' " ' ,'I I L_.. 1_____. ,. . . . " ' , !/....,,'....../ '47.,,--- ~.. . '. , , -, , ;0 .... 'It' .....,..... \ ~, . . . ,.....,<0 , " \......\ ,,'.....,.... . ,'. ~ - .6 > \A1~.\_ ~ , , \0 ,.., , ... ' . _f............., .- - -"'-. : I ~--: ,-- -. 0 . "It' I ~ t_____-! -....~-~ ,-~- .--: .,.,""'1 1 !.._,- - --- ,2064 ~ - - I , , ' - --, : ~_O~? , , ,- .. .. ~ ~ u 2O<fO I _..! , . , :---2-036: L, ~ I ; , . . ~........ -' ,-2Ma : I.! , . ~~O5!, : :- -1"~ . , , ,- , . l_ _. r ... 2~8 , , , , '- ...-' ".;:_. .:: . - 20(5___: 2fR>'P-'.. , . , , -, :_--~ ~063:_ -' ~..... : 2:057:_ , , , , , -' 2051 ~ 21145; , . , . , . , , ~ '. )l; 2~i~__: c: 2~-~__ ::0 - - . , , 0 , ----- 2~--' , , I ;: :.._- .~ 2~tj-:-, : 1-' L_ __I :!,byr-; :---- -: 0--.. I CO - -- . :!; RIDGELANE RD '" ___ II) . --~ . , . ,- I L-;:_/_. ., " --~._~ ,-- il ""fl I , ., , , -' __----' L____' : : r-- -'-: '---.. !d t co I :-! ~-~-_. --..... '- . - -"~ \....~ '!. ~ ~~ l.-----~ ~- -- ~\ 1)l;--\ \ "": ,""'i -.. : ~ \ " -....-,-- ----~ ..~ .. ......~\ ~----2}24 , . ,. . , .- , , '" . ~-;~--' : _2_0/6 ... --, , ,- , '-:~~~ , , -, 206"''' , ' r-- -, , . , . . , ~ ---~ ~__I ", ;, ~I ,~ '-.g~ ,..- --, .- ' I .~.. :-4lJ1s ,---I , , . ..- : ~~O 1- -......, , , , , :_ _ _2~16 , - --I , , , , n, : 20.:fO .-----, , : 1_ _ , :_~~4 , . , '___I ..' '1 , , :_.f!.918 ,-1- --: :_-_.~ " ~..- : ...... 1_.. ,-. . , :S(.- - - ~ ""!; t-.. ~ ~ I-.~ --_.~ ~-. I-! -_.--~ : : iT -- : ~.:.. ~~-I : , . r-.-'''j ..., , , 2075 :---- '~-- --- --- '--..- i . , - -- - - - - --- - - -.._-' ,-, , , , , L _, ,--" ---- - - ----- .--'--, , ~ - -.. - - - - - - - - - - - -'- - ~ , '- -... ~ ;'.~' ., r' . . , . -!.._I- ~ (.W': ~ /1 \ !I .-, I!NJ: \ ~ :.: .... ',' f ! :~j --I-'~i , .--; ~ : - -. ..;!;---- BYRAM DR ;:: ... :- - ~':'-, , ' L____,-I ~------l , : --I ' L... _I 0: --- .... , _'""I_I , . , , , \_-...--~ , , --- , , , , , , , , . . , , , ... _ _ _ __I 206)i._un, C , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , . , , : , . . , ,~-----, --- .. -- -- r --I , , , ' , ,-----, , , ' , , , , , ' , . , . , ' , , . - ----- , , . ' , . ' , , , ' . . , . , . . :-... ~ , . . . . ----.. -~-I ': Q: : "': ,- - -.. 'I_,{t. .. -lg..! I C"'l: ~ -.~'-~;. K~~ ~--~j C~.~~ C~~ ,--I ,----, --- : ~~r: :__ :.- .__!O_ -aI' "j K~~~ -- ~ ~.- ;-:_~ :---~~ , : : I : '- -' - - ,- - ~ _.! ,.., " . ,--, ~ .. -I - -' ~,."~" ~ '-. ,Y , ' '---, ~'" , , , , ,""1974; ,_ _... _ J ,- - - - - - - p - - - - ... - -- - - ... - - - . , , --. . !!16~ . " ., , , ./ -1-96l!., '- , ~--------------._----_! . :-----------: : : : I ~----------j , Zoning Map Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: LUZ2004-Q3002 Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size(Acres): Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR A tlas Page: 252A ....'" " , , HDR " , ,"',1. . ''- ..... ,- -. - - - --_.- - ----- - -- ------. . . ,___, - - --- -' - ---- -. - --- --I__~ , 2045 r--- , . , . , . , ' '- - - ~ ... - --, , , , , , , . . .----, ...... HDR ::ii!:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , .. ... ..'.. ,-----...------ ,-----.------ 1 " I , 'I I ,-----...------, '------------' j',"':" "i"" ; , , " , ," , " . , ',,~' .....:, , ~" . ' , . ' , ' " , , , . . . : : :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}: : , , I I '__.J 1__, ,---- - --- --- - - - - -_..- - - ----I , . , , 1- _ _.. - - - - - .. -- - - - - - .." - - - - - -- i ~l!43 .. .................... ... ...................... ... ! I .....> .................. :u,u: ,____j.__.--/- ~: CfI J_.. ,I "i f__ ",,:e t _ _... '. . "" 1:;.__ -~ - - "'- , .. ,,........ "" I ..... '. .&,';' " .,- " fl. "'...~,." ...~.. ~ ~ ~\ '" ,~, ,:ll-_.-. "'. ~\l,' ,-- - . 9;i -,.... : : :.... ' ~""'" --,---- -'. <,:: <fob , ,6'" ...... \ , ',"'$0 '... ,-..1, ................~.. (,,) ,.....' ....... , ",,~~ : '\~, 19f/s ~""/\ .... ~..." ~-, .- .-~, ~~ I I "",0 " , .._~' :_---~: .. - . . . " '" ' . !/.......,......../ 47.fr--; ., ~ ... ..:!;,......'..- \ , , ,......,.. , , " " ,'....,.... , , . '-. ,'. ~ . ~6 ~ ~A1~' -:.. : I.. , \Q ,..,''', .. ' . -.......,..... t- - - --. I r--I I ~ '__.. '---'0: ~ . ~ '_m._! '" ., ... .u '" __ '" ~ . -.... ',,- ,-- I ., ---.... I I I I I ~"i_J~-~ ----: ~____,- ~-'----I r----.~I I I I I :.._- ~ ~ : 3t : I_~ ~_'f'--' -...........\ , .. " l-'"'! ~ ~ "'LJ;; 'i, - .-----~~. u \ ~','" \ ~ ..... -.. : , I" ,-- I 1;', ,"_ ~m-' , .' , ........ " -~...-~ l-~-'--: "1',..... 1 _____1 !.._,----- ""\~_.. --: 20(S_ _ f 2tJ1;!l'~, , , : -- ~_I : _2_0/6 : " , ' -:~l?1' , ., ' ~064~ , " r ---, , , , , 2075 :----"---------.--L-i :-: I _____________..__, ,,_ ,--' ----- ------ .--'--, : --"- --- ------ --'- - ~ , '-.... .. ".zj , , ", r' , , , , -!.._,- ~ I~M'. !t ~-.'. '" ~ : ' ~ "t" .. I ! ! ::-': '201M i"" I , , - - - I , ~063:_ J--'-Ll . ~l , l_.g~ ...... .. ,- ,- ,- ~ :_.g~ ,---, , , , ,- : 2040 ,- -.. -, , , , , L.. _2_c16 ."" -, I , , , --, : 2D.!O ,- - ---I , : 1_ _ I : 2424 ~ --, ..' " ...Jills I-..!-~--I :~,---~ "'!: '" --.--~ , --I : -- '-""i , , "''' , --;--~..X..-.! BYRAM DR 20~ __ h -- -- ,. --I - .- ,- --; 1 I Mulii~(amny . , , , , , , , I , ._____ . , , re$idential , , , , , , , , , , , , : , , , I 1- _. , : : , ,-- .----p- --- ---- --- --~. I I , : , ---------------._------ --- , - -. -, (--~~ :-~: ,---. , '*, '-/Jl~ , ",' K'. - =c2 0\ ~- ~ .--','1; ~_ ~ .-:: ~- -:' --, ~-- ---. -,-,.!. c L~~-:~ ,--~ -(~~ ...,. It)O'_ O'-. II) ,___~, . : --:: :' '--'-- '--~_.! ,-, " ' "~'b' :- , i:l,- \\ ,Y . " ,- --I ... . , , , ,-11974j '-... -.. , IMII; ~. II -, , ~J096~ I Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: ] LUZ2004-Q3oo2 i I Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property 4.4 Size(Acresl: Land Use Zoning PIN: 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 From RL A-E (County) 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 . 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 To: RH MHDR A tlas Page: 252A " , , ,,\zo~ 2f157: .', '. -fa nil~ ~es.m~lnti~ r51 1- __, :- -:T0'lf> , . , ,. . , L__' ." 2P45; ~ : : , , 1_ __, iTI :,---- ;t.; 2q~~ __: c:: 2Q3S" - : :0 ~- --: t:J ' ~--2040 ~ ;-.! , , :- - -2036: ", ;-' ~ : ;- - ,.,3a , , I ,- I , L , 2~--1 , , L__~~ :----2-(>24 2~j-: .. Sine e- f li'nily r~c en1 ~:'-1 , , , 1 '___I , . I b-. , co --- :!: ~-'-~ : RIDGELANE RD ~ '" j"~ ._-.~ ;-, ,-i 1 , , -- I 1 ': , ,----- Sin ~le-jamilv resi len ial " ----~ ~:-1_1 ;;: I--":!: , '--I I , '-----,-' ~ --- =t-- - , , , --I 1 L __, I-~-: : '-...__-1 , , , , , , '------ .-----------1 , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,-----______1 , ------------ """ , . , , , ,', , , , . j- -.. -- - --_.-- - --- -. --- ------: , - _ --- -. - - --- -._-----,--~ 2tMS ::t 3: ,...,' ...... Ci) , ~ , , , , , , , , ," '. , '. ~ 2043 :b ~ r---; , , : : 1- _ _ ~ ...- --I , , , , , . , , , , 1-----....----- ,_____..-----_ I II . :-Multi.:.f~mllj; - -.: Cf:esidential :" , , , , , , .--------------j' , : : :_-------------~: : 1 I 1 1 I__.J 1__1 ,-- --- -- - --- - - - - - --- ------1 , , , , ,---.. --- -- - -- --- --_..- -... - --- ,--'--: ----l--l 'Ct': ...-~ "" ""- : :ll: q. :-. r-' -; /., ~agle-,~a v '-- 011 ~ I .. I ..,...:a ..1.....""0, 1 .-"', 1:;._'._ --,,I!f " : "'J..._~ ~. I .~ ".', Q ... : '" ' ,. ~ ...,J;""':"""~ l~~ --\ " ~ '" .. " - -' ...:.. ". ~'\,,' --.'~' ~---Jr;:;:' -~ ....\1 , .." : : :.. -- ,. ~,~.. ' :\"." ;. --,-..- -'-:' : 'fib . A " (' ....../ q. ....6\... ,\ Existing Surrounding Uses Map ~ '" --, ._~-~I , ~, , ' -L_~I :_____: / ........ '" ' , ~,'.....,'......,' 47;r-"'i.. -, , Ie _- q- ,,-...,..- , '"1' , - . .- ,....,.., , ,- /'''"RU , , , , '-, ,', ~ . .j; ~ ~.1~-\. iO "'".... ... ' . ........ , " ,-----. ..- -, .---: o:~ '--;. , ~ '_mu'! -....~-~ l-~- '--: '1',.... 1 --,----- ,2O<M ~.. - t , , ' - --, . , , , ..-- - --, : ~_~fl , , 1- __I )205; ~I " ~;;:- - - -: : _2_0/6 , - 20r.,S___: 2~?J-~: , -, :_-- ~ ~b63:_, , ~ - -;- 2l>,57:_, , , , - , -- - 2051 ~ P45; , , , , , , 1_.. _I iTI ~JW ):l; ~~~-_: c:: ~-~- ::0 - - , , 0 , , ----- ~~--: : ;~ '--- ~.. 2~~j -:_, , , , ,- 1._.. _, 2lJI? u; -. , , , 1__ _1 RIDGELANE RD 16- '_u: ... '" ___ II) . -.~ , ~i_J~_1 ., " "- --, ~ ,-- -Ii ---...., I ..:t I : _I ___---11.----' ::-!E~ , ,- l_ _. ~--2MO ~ ~.! , : r - -2036: I., ;-' ; : . - 2i)3a , , , ,- , : : - - - -2-!J24 '. , r" 2"~~8 , '- ~ -- : .... I ,_1 "- "- !I! .-.~ ___r~ r-' .-.li I I J I ~- . I I I I I I 1__ __.! RU p~--- ~ ;- : 1'"-__0-. J \ ~__. ': fO : ~_...~ I ~ I l()__: , ~.. ._3ll __'II" ~~ ~' ",,,- It:: ~' ~..:-\r----~ -!...-; R--;" .......\ \\.....__1-- ___-~ L_~: \ ..,,__~\ 1__-- -- - -- : ' , , I_:~~~ , 1_, I 2064' . ' r- -, , , , . J--'-", ;I~I l~ 1_.g.{)f/2 ,.-" ~-, , ' -; .~.. :-.ge1, 1---' . , . "- : 2040 .- - - - , , , , . :_ _ _2_o!6 --, . , . . --, ~ _ _ _2_DJO 1-----' , . 1_ _ ,I : 2Q24 - --, ..' '1 . , : _ ~P!8 I-~-!..- -, '0 ' ~,___.J '" __.u; , , --I , , __'--'1 "'j : - -- -', , 1 , Q ~__ CIl ~ , .----~ !;" .-~ I_-;--~Li---~ BYRAM DR ~ --- :t- - - , 1- I : ~ -. ' L __, -~_:- : . , , . ~-....--~ 2075 - - ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I - -L _ , , , . . , , ,___-------------L__' 1..-, . , -- , , , , , . . . , . . . , , 20~-_-__, , , , , , , . . . . , , , , . , , . _u , ..._____1 -- -- I'" --I , , , ' , ,-----, , , : ' . , , , . , , , , , ~---_.. , , , . . , . , , . , , , , , , , ,- -.. 1- -" - -- - - - - - - - -..- -, -- . ' : -_..- --- ------ --~--~ .- - - - - - -.. - - - - .. .. -- . - - - - - . , l. _. ~..--------------.._---_! I ,,' , " , , \,," :_m__m RH-m- m: , . ' , I I . I I I I ....---------- "______-----, r--- , . , . , . , ' '- --~ , \,~, , " ,,' ,--,-----_..----------------' . ' '_ __,-- ___..I - - --- -. _ ___ _ _,__~ 2045 RM ...- --I . , , , , , , , ,----, . ". f-----..------ ,-----..-----.. . ", ' , " ' ,-----..-----.1 '-_____------' ,- --~ , . . , . , , , , , . , '__J ,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - j :_-------------~ ,----- - -- --- -- - - ---- -- ----I , . , , 1- _ _" - - - - - - -- - - - - - -.. - - - - - ~- .u,u: .-___j_ ,___ :~: :_.. ,I - ; '__ 01' ~ ,___ , \_=" --..- !~ ,'...... ...,. I .... .~, ,f',' ,', "" ' , ~~. .. ~<~ ~'1> , ~,J,;"i-" c ,0 :--- : t(U: ~...... --,__-- "'-,' II b ......,' q~ . " ~..' "'s:D I.. ,~ .............5.. to) Future Land Use Map Owner Leonard Chetkin & Mary Chetkin Case: I I Site: 2025 North Highland Avenue Property Size(Acres): Land Use Zoning PIN: From RL A-E (County) To: RH MHDR A tlas Page: :i!: ~ ~ !; ~ :b ~ ,.,' ....... ...."., ....'....:, .'....// .{..:../.... ...'..........>/< 204;1 ...... v> "."..> ............,....... IV .... ../.'..:' \ \ I....' ";".. . . """,,'" " "or ' ,--I . '. 1945 ___: ~':J'I !r.".-"-' ".. ~", , '---- :l,_~~ .Mii\ 1. :- ~ L v~ , ! ! ::- , , , , . , I : I'----~ :-~~ I~ .i~ ~-ti: :--c-;~ <._~~~ -- ",..-, ~ ~--~~~ [~'~,~] [~~ , ' , , " . . . . , . . , , , 1--1 ,--I ,----, -(:_-~ ~ -- - ...'~ .- [__~J i~~~~j " ~.,~~,"-: \ ~'- , . , " RU7], . f__ _.. ' /i lll68; ~ ~ II ~ - ' ~196~ LUZ2004--03002 4.4 02/29/15/00000/210/0600 02/29/15/00000/210/0700 02/29/15/00000/210/0800 252A . . fl1!LTT~ ~1~~~lOF T/f~ l~"l~~" ,~~ ,) I /-~,.", ,!\", ~ lo\ g~~~~;rJfl ~..::x:~ ~1-~~~ ~~'-:-~t1!~1~' .....~1f)~TEo ~'\;,~ #+;,"1 0.......' ~#7JJ1. CITY OF CLEARWATER LoNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRnE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 March 5, 2004 Mr. Alex Panik Panik Engineering, Inc. 39326 U.S. Highway 19 N. Tarpon Springs, Florida 34689 RE: Application for Annexation (ANX2004-03004) approval to PDllsieconsisting of three parcels and totaling 4.4 acres, into the City of Clearw~ 2025 North Highland A venue and Land Use/Zoning amendment (LUZJQQ1 QsQ02) to change Residential Low (RL) land use to Residential High (RR) and to change the zoning from Agricultural Estate (A-E) (County) to Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) (City). Dear Mr. Panik: The Planning Department has reviewed your application for the Annexation (ANX2004-03004) and Land Use/Zoning amendment (LUZ2004-03002) for the site at 2025 North Highland A venue. After a preliminary review, staff determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case numbers: ANX2004-03004 and LUZ2004-03002. The following schedule has been tentatively established for the review of your application by various City boards. These meetings are necessary in order to process your request appropriately. The attendance by you or your client is required at the Development Review Committee and Community Development Board meetings. Should any of the following meeting times and/or locations change you will be contacted immediately. 04/01/04 Development Review Committee, time to be determined (Please call Angel Haines at 727.562.4579 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed.); in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle A venue in Clearwater. The case will be forwarded to the Community Development Board when it is deemed sufficient. 5/18/04 Community Development Board, meeting starts at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers on the 3rd Floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue. BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIIlI3ARD, COMMISSIONER (1) BII,LjONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" March 5, 2004 Panik - Page Two . . 6/17/04 City Commission (first reading), meeting starts at 6:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers on the 3rd Floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue For the Annexation amendment portion only: 7/15/04 City Commission (second reading), meeting starts at 6:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers on the 3rd Floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue For the Land Use and Zoning amendment portion only: TBD 7/21/04 8/10/04 City Commission (second reading), meeting starts at 6:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers on the 3rd Floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue. Your application will be forwarded to the DCA for State review on or before 7 /1104. The date of the second City Commission meeting will be determined ~:shopld"the~tate approve the application. ~~:, ;:L.~::1:..._'_.~"..."..~~~ 'Pinelta:"S"'1'nlnning Council, meeting starts at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Assembly Room on the 5th Floor of the Pinellas County Courthouse at 315 Court Street. Countywide Planning Authority, meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. in the Board of County Commissioners Assembly Room on the 5th Floor of the Pinellas County Courthouse at 315 Court Street. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4558. Sincerely yours, ~---------~ Mark T. Parry Planner S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\Annexations\ANX - 2004\ANX2004-0300X 2043 N HighlandlANX2004-0300X and LUZ2004-0300X complete ltr.doc -''''''''.''''''''''''..''..'' .w.w,.,.-..,',.-.....-.-,'.-.-.., ...,....-..-,.-..,.,...-,.-,......... .-MW.M....y.,.,'W'. '.'."_"_".'..", ," ... '.' ',...'.-.... ,..~..-.-.." .-'.- ;,i,JiiJf,.J;!~,f;.~~f~3Y.,:'f;;"'o"-~-,;"-_O"o;Z~"O T..zmpL1 Ba\-' ;J(.~?k,,,..lI "P1ann~nu Cl'lu"cll -- . Agenda Item #3.H.l 08/09/04 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AMENDMENT REPORT q Mf .1t{~l()Lf CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#04-2 PURSUANT TO SECTION 163.3184(6)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, IT IS REQUESTED THAT DCA NOT REVIEW THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 . e AMENDMENT #LUZ2004-03002 - Future Land Use Map . From: To: Pinellas County Residential Low (RL) Residential High (RH) . . Size: 4.4 acres . Location: 2025 North Highland Avenue · Existing Use: Two single-family dwellings · Proposed Use: 132 townhouse dwellings · Adjacent Designations: North: RH South: Residential Urban (RU) East: RH · West: RU · Adjacent Uses: · North: Multi-familyresidential · South: Single-family residential · East: Multi-family residential · West: Single-family residential · Regionally Significant: No, based on the fact the proposed amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resources or facilities. · Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No, based on the fact that the proposed amendment does not raise any extra-jurisdictional issues. · Impact regional facilities/resources?: No, based on the fact the proposed amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resources or facilities. · Regional Comments: None. · Applicable SRPP Policies: None. · Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 1 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 ~;R 1:3[j I r.3""J--: l7'J - -, o . - , =-=-=-= ... 023-' , 0_ - , . , , ,- . :uJ7--..; -. I , , 1__ _I '-----1 , , .~ '" "___I .. C?D ----- 051 0, I.. -r.......)5~? '.4":1; , , , .... -' ,.- - ~'-f ,_ I l r::" I ' '- -2.('..16 .---, , 1 l..__ ; 20-W -...:~ f- -......, . , . , . , 20:}" '- -......: ........ . I , , , ';.;-.. _2_030 ,-----, , ' 1_... ,I ~ :!q24 ~~, o , ..1 \ o , :__2918 ,-, , , '0 ' ~;~l---.J ... , , ..... ,- -"-; . , ('It N I .... -~i.. ~..._....! -I - YRAM DR .....- -.., , .. -. I ~'... -' .... "-, ,-:t- : , . . <: .~ G) :::t: r- h ~ h ~ o , , , , , , , , t.._____f , , o , , . . , , , , '..... .. ~-~----_._---.._--------: 1----_--.--- __.. ___ _.. ___.l , I ~ .. .. , f- -- ------ f1ff--' - -- c-.; ..----.-...-___J :__..________: , ,-- ----.... - --- -~----.. -._-: r--- , ' , . , , 1- __.ot ........... . . . , ,_ ...._._1 ;~ :---~ L._.. .....2 ,----.....---..-... , , , I ,_........... __ .. d. _ _ _' l.i--_ a H ,--, {" M.,' ::::-...-, i t1 : _ _ ~;~ '- ~""". [~~~~~~~~~~~~~] , " , , , , , , , 1..._. r ,- -, :...- \C: . C'. 1_.. ~.. L.. =-r '~ RU~:f. I.... .. _ 4 J9B:~ ~.. ,I -, , ".L. i:H:o.a~ -'-- Future Land Use MaD For Council meeting of9 Aug 2004 Report prepared: 12 July 2004 2 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e . ~~I- Tampa Sav Xegional Planning Council C&ajy Commissioner Steve Simon vice-d;Jair Commissioner Jane von Rahmann Secretary/I'reasurer Robert I<ersteen Executive Director Manny PumariefJa 29 October 2004 Ms. Gina Clayton Long Range Planning Manager City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756 ri; (I' JC n fm re . D U" .:r;ls, V! Ie; n Wi ! 1~;:_--:-20':;"'04 - 11I11' II' ..~.J c. JIIJ I LJl LJ . PU\NNF.~;?: !~, r;~::,..' --"::>'(J r svcs Dear Gina: Enclosed is a copy of the Council's review of the City of Clearwater's second adopted amendment of 2004. The report will be an agenda item for Council consideration at the Monday, 8 November, Council meeting, which will begin at 10:00 a.m. Please do not hesitate to contact me if more information or clarification concerning the contents of the report is needed. Sincerely, C:::-4..~~ H. Gerald Smelt, AICP Governmental Services Coordinator Enclosure 4000 Gatewa~ Centre Bou[evar~ Suite 1 00 . Pine[[as Par~ FL 33782 Pbone: 727-570-5151 . Fax: 727-570-5II8 . State Number: 513-5066 . www.tbrpc.orfJ :, e IlliI"lIlMiiiffI1Ili;ml5AiIIl! ~ mr&'@3..~~t$ ~,.~ :::;;:::::::::::. . ......~:::::::::::?::::::::::::? ~....._......... -.....-..-...........-....... ............................-........ ..h,.,....._., ... --.--.-.- -. -... -..- ---. Tampa Bay XeglonaJ 11annlng Council . LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED AMENDMENT REPORT For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 CITY OF CLEARWATER DCA#04-2 Agenda Item #3.H.3 11/08/04 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e (This page intentionally left blank) For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 e Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 ! e e AMENDMENT #LUZ2004-03002 - Future Land Use Map . From: To: Pinellas County Residential Low (RL) Residential High (RH) . . Size: 4.4 acres . Location: 2025 North Highland Avenue · Existing Use: Two single-family dwellings . Proposed Use: 132 townhouse dwellings · Adjacent Designations: · North: RH · South: Residential Urban (RU) · East: RH · West: RU · Adjacent Uses: · North: Multi-family residential · South: Single-family residential · East: Multi-family residential · West: Single-family residential · Regionally Significant: No, based on the fact that the amendment does not impact identified regionally significant resources or facilities. · Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No. · Efforts of the proposed amendment on the following issues: · Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: Not applicable. · Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP, including but not limited to groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Not applicable. For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 1 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e e · Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: No information provided with initial submission package. · Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: Not applicable. . Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: Not applicable. · Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities, including but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: Not applicable. · Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: Not applicable. . Regional Comments: None. . Applicable SRPP Policies: None. -- . Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 2 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e . .' AMENDMENT #LUZ2004-03003- - Future Land Use Map . From: To: RU Recreation, Open Space (RlOS) . . Size: 36.6 acres . Location: 2950 Glen Oak Avenue · Existing Use: Vacant; formerly a mobile home park · Proposed Use: Open space associated with the Kapok Wetland Restoration · Adjacent Designations: · North: Preservation (P), Residential Medium (RM), and Residential Low (RL) · South: P and RlOS · East: RL · West: RlOS and RM · Adjacent Uses: · North: Single- and multi-family residential · South: Eddie C. Moore Recreation Complex · East: Single-family residential · West: Cliff Stephens Park and multi-family residential · Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that the amendment represents an opportunity to both protect an environmentally sensitive water body (Alligator Creek) and provide additional recreation and open space with a highly urbanized setting. · Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: No. · Efforts of the proposed amendment on the following issues: · Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: Not applicable. · Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP, including but not limited to groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Not applicable. For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 3 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 e e Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: Not applicable. · Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: See above comments. · Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: Not applicable. · Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities, including but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: Not applicable. · Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: Not applicable. . Regional Comments: None. · Applicable SRPP Policies: Natural Resources: 4.5.13, 4.10.2, 4.10.3, 4.11.10, 4.16.1, _' and 4.16.4 . Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 4 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 - . .. AMENDMENT #CP A2004-04001 - Future Land Use Element · Description: In keeping with the provisions of Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach, amended Policy 2.1.4 to replace the Yacht Basin site as one of the three designated areas available for the 600 additional hotel room incentive. · Regionally Significant: Yes, based on the fact that Clearwater Beach is located entirely within the Coastal High Hazard Area and the amendment continues to support redevelopment activities within an area recognized as important to the region's tourism industry. · Result in extra-jurisdictional impacts?: None. · Efforts of the proposed amendment on the following issues: · Compatibility among local plans including, but not limited to, land use and compatibility with military bases: Not applicable. · Impact/protect regional facilities/resources identified in the SRPP, including but not limited to groundwater recharge and the availability of water supply: Dependent upon the mitigation of any future development impacts on SR 60 which serves as the evacuation route from Clearwater Beach. · Affordable housing issues and designation of adequate sites for affordable housing: Not applicable. · Protection of natural resources of regional significance identified in the SRPP including, but not limited to protection of spring and groundwater resources, and recharge potential: Not applicable. · Effectiveness and enhancement of economic development within the region including, but not limited to, preservation of military bases: See previous comment. For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 5 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 tit - . Compatibility with regional transportation corridors and facilities, including but not limited to, roadways, seaports, airports, public transportation systems, high speed rail facilities, and intermodal facilities: See previous comment. . Adequacy of and compatibility with emergency preparedness plans and local mitigation strategies (plans) including, but not limited to, the impacts on and availability of hurricane shelters, maintenance of county hurricane evacuation clearance times, and hazard mitigation: Not applicable. . . Regional-Comments: - -cNone~ · Applicable SRPP Policies: Economic Development: 2.3.1 . Emergency Preparedness: 3.2.3 . Consistency with SRPP: Consistent. For Council meeting of 8 Nov 2004 Report prepared: 21 Oct 2004 6 Report prepared by: Gerald Smelt, Ext. 28 . ~ azr,J~_;_~~wdl~~~ ____ __..____........~~~.::...-~::.:..-.-:-:n.. ... ~:.~.~=:--~ ._.___..._.______-:..__.-n~---.~.....n.. __ _n_u. .-U.-J.lAjj.Ul)v IIll~~cL____.~~:~-- 'pu .. ___::.u- - -.-.-.. 0 , --1OG~V ' , _.._.n..._....._..._..__._____+~--- _. . ..._..._._..._..... _'..u' ... .. ------ . --I05'fJo ..-JYtf)Ult.a-ot--t\VM '. .--- --~--=;[J~~\. ldV\~____n~_n_~- . .~..- .. :=:=~:.~=-~,~lL R~j.---~~-n- .-.... . ._: - ... -----.--.-..-7----55:iML--~ui_c.--.-n-----... -- --- ----------.-------.-n-n\~-6 ~ . . .-n--------;----u--unun__ - un u ~-:~:=~_~=_:-~<L-'p (Jt/f1J.ag:=~-ifnn:--g--z _ __un:-.--:~:" .... ___n______._n____ . --1d1.lJ.e.ClWJL1r1/1.ti_____.... -__@-J n. _Unn . ___un . .... .. - ~._n.._ ~~_ -., . tJt~:~i.d ...fcf;U-u~7 --- .___~--~!AJU{ '(~~W- -/trl-ltS& ~_5I!J . . n_ - fj~\j)--/ ,- -n-'-iil- ~. _n___ - - - ----.---------- -- - - n n _ _n___ --------~~\h~ 0 D - - --, - - .. - ------.-.- .:ll~t . ~ e Parry, Mark From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Tuesday, November 02,20043:18 PM Parry, Mark RE: 2025 N. Highland thanks - perhaps you should put this e-mail in the case file and large scale file. -----Original Messagem-- From: Parry, Mark Sent: Tuesday, November 02,20043:15 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: 2025 N. Highland e Just spoke with Debi with DCA - fax and letter just crossed - she's good with the fax and it's all getting processed as we type. Should be done by November 15th. Mark T. Parry Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 727.562.4558 mark. parry@myclearwater.com 1 . . Pa,y, Mark ~. From: Sent: To: Subject: Clayton, Gina Thursday, September 09, 2004 1 :09 PM Parry, Mark FW: Did I send you this for the file?? If not - Please put a hard copy in the file. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 3:08 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: FYI and for file. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapani@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 9:02 AM To: Tarapani, Cyndi; Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: FW: -----Original Message----- From: Bennett, Jim [mailto:jbennett@co.pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 5:00 PM To: Akin, Pam Subject: RE: OK by me but it seems a little unusual since you are the permitting authority. By copy of this I'm advising David Sadowsky. -----Original Message----- From: <Pam.Akin@myClearwater.com> [mailto:Pam.Akin@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 10:36 AM To: Bennett, Jim Cc: Leslie.Dougall-Sides@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Jim, thanks. I think that the dilemma is that we (the City) need nothing here since have approved the proposed density. The only purpose of this restriction is to meet PPC and CPA concerns. If the CPA will accept a Deed restriction, we do not object. Millian represented that the County would be the "beneficiary" or enforcing party to restriction, which is our preference -----Original Message----- From: Bennett, Jim [mailto:jbennett@co.pinellas.fl.us] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 9:26 AM To: Akin, Pam Cc: Sadowsky, David Subject: RE: 1 we the Rick the Pam. For avoj.d the De,,~~loper place. What I told them was, as an accommodation to the City, if the City was happy with a deed restriction, I would be prepared to recommend approval on the strength of a deed restriction understanding that a developer agreement would follow. The deed restriction could even make reference to a commitment to enter into a developer agreement. I expressed no opinion on the density issue. our own items, we~'t accept deed restrictions, ~ developer agreements. contract zoning argument, we only use Developer Agreements. However, our Agreements only require conceptual plans and do not take a long time to put in To -----Original Message----- From: <Pam.Akin@myClearwater.com> [mailto:Pam.Akin@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:23 AM To: Bennett, Jim Cc: Cyndi.Tarapani@myClearwater.com; Leslie.Dougall-Sides@myClearwater.com Subject: <<Mayor Aungst.PDF>> Jim, Is this an accurate reflection of your position? 2 BayshoreJBroadway, Inc. City of Clearwater 1731 2/26/2004 Fees 885.00 Checking Annexation, Comp. Plan Amen., Zoning Atlas Amend Hig 885.00 Bayshore/Broadway, Inc. City of Clearwater 1731 2/26/2004 Fees 885.00 r4A R t\~4 Checking Annexation. Comp. Plan Amen., Zoning AtlaS Amend Mig 885.00 VersaCheck Form 1000 Prestige Rev. 3.0 Line Items: Case No LUZ2004-03002 Payments: Method Check '. Receipt #: 1200400000000002956 Date: 03/19/2004 3/19/2004 3:01:52PM Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid Land Use & Atlas Amendment 010-341263 885.00 $885.00 Line Item Total: Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid BAYSHORE 1 BROADWAY SLW 1731 In Person 885.00 $885.00 Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipl.rpt Page 1 of 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRAFFIC STUDY HIGHLAND AVENUE (N. Highland Ave.) CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: BAYSHORE BROADWAY DEVELOPERS FOR SUBMITTAL TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER PREPARED BY: AVID ENGINEERING, INC. MAY 3,2004 - ~. a~.--;> ---.-.~ 1donal Engineer; _. jn~~. Calder~' 513/01 P.:&-~53116 . I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1 2. SITE ACCESSIBILITy........................ ............................. ......................................... 3 3. DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS ................................................ 6 4. FUTURE CONDITIONS................... ...................... ................................................... 9 Development Access Plan....... ...... .......... ... ....... ....... ..................... .... ........ .............. ....... 9 Background Traffic Proj ections................ ...................................................................... 9 5. CONCLUSION.................... ......... ........... ....................................... .......................... 14 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FIGURES Figure 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP....... ..... .... ............. ...................... ........................... ...... 2 Figure 2 - EXISITING TRAFFIC (P.M. PEAK HOUR - RAW DATA) ......................... 5 Figure 3 - DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ................................................................... 8 Figure 4 - SITE TRAFFIC............. ........ ...... ......... ...... .......... ............ .... ......... .......... ........ 12 Figure 5 - 2005 TOTAL TRAFFIC............ ............. ................................................. ........ 13 TABLES Table 1 2004 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION RESULTS.......................... 4 Table 2 - DAILY TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES..................................................... 7 Table 3 - P.M. PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES.................................. 7 Table 4 2005 POST DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY... 10 Table 5 2005 POST DEVELOPMENT ARTERIAL LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY... 11 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. INTRODUCTION The proposed Highland Avenue Development is planned to be located in the City of Clearwater, on the eastside ofN. Highland Ave. (south of the intersection of Union SUN. Highland Ave.) The site will have one access connection to Highland Ave. Figure 1 displays the site location and area roadways. The Highland Avenue Development will consist of 132 townhomes. This report provides existing traffic volume information, project trip generation, project distribution, project trip assignments, pass-by trip data, and an evaluation of the post development conditions with the proposed development and its access plan. Methodology discussions were held with the City 9f Clearwater Traffic Operations staff to discuss the details of the traffic study. A copy of the signed methodology is contained in the Appendix. AVID ENGINEERING, lNe K:\projects\2000\2049001\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 1 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ eM EnlJ/tt<<NW PIIIIIIlt1I'S Tr.fflc Engln... A.. "'. .... '.i.' ..........'... ~. '......~. ............ .... ....?J. ...... , Lmrd.t:.. An:hIttH:t11 Envlrrm""",t. Eng/mHln ..4. .,....0.',. 2300 Curl.. Road, Suit. 100 I . ..... EN;UIEE~ING. /NC. TeI:(72;t~~~ ~::;(;2~:;'-66&2 Our o_y n_ _1Jd. 'fN n..If_ ....ovldeng.com NOT TO SCALE PROJECT LOCATION I 10) I'l'- I . I~ I I I j I S.R. 580 I I I ~ / ~ 1--/ oi( as 13 :s III D.. UnDon St. RidgelslIl'1Id Rd. i Sunset Point Rd. / -.................( I as : ~ ag c as :!: , t>> 1- I~ I IDrew St LOCA liON MAP \ '~.-r ~~. fb~ ~~~ 1 I . ~ 16. ,CD ''6 Q) m C>> ~ c4 :J ~..m..... PROJECT: HIGHLAND TOWNHOMES APPLICANT: BAYSHORE BROADWAY DEVELOPERS COUNTY: PINELLAS SHEET: 1 1:: G> .0 G> .J::. >. ~ .!l!, ~ a. Il) C') cO C') 'i g o ~ in Z o 8 o ..J W l- ii) c; !l: "t:l U IE !!! I-;- G> ~ "t:l c: III :E C> :E 13 IE ~ o o '" v o ~ o o o ~ G w ...., o 0:: 9- ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. SITE ACCESSIBILITY The proposed redevelopment will have one access connection to N. Highland Ave. The following section describes the existing roadways adjacent to the site: N. Hh!hland Ave. - is classified as a signalized two-lane undivided arterial roadway1. Based on the analysis performed in ArtPlan, this roadway currently operates at an acceptable level of service for the segment between Sunset Point Road to Union Street. The posted speed limit along N. Highland Ave. is 35 mph. North on Union St., the speed limit drops to 25 mph due to construction work. Union Street - is classified as a two-lane undivided collector to the north of the site1. This roadway currently operates at an acceptable level of service1. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. Sunset Point Road - is classified as a four-lane divided arterial between Belcher Road and Keene Road1. Keene Road westbound to Alt. 19 is classified as a two-lane undivided arterial roadway1. Both segments operate at an acceptable level of service1. The posted speed limit is 35 mph westbound to the intersection of Sunset Pt. Rd./N. Highland Ave. and drops to 25 mph after the intersection. Existine: Traffic Volumes New PM peak-hour turning movement counts (TMC) were conducted at the following intersections: ~ N. Highland Ave. @ Union St. ~ N. Highland Ave. @ Sunset Point Rd. 1 Pinellas County MPO, 2003 Level of Service Report AVID ENGINEERING, INC K:\projects\2000\2049001\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 3 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. The TMC's were adjusted to reflect peak-season conditions. The peak season counts were determined by multiplying the existing counts by the Pinellas County peak-season factor 0.98. The peak-season factor was detennined based on the 2002 Peak Season Factor Category Report obtained from FDOT for Pinellas County, and is contained in the Appendix. Figure 2, displays the Existing Traffic volumes for the P.M. peak hour (raw- data). The raw count data is contained in the Appendix. The existing PM peak hour (peak-season) traffic conditions for the study intersections were analyzed with the HCS software for signalized intersections. The signal timings obtained from the City are contained in the Appendix. The detailed HCS intersection analysis worksheets are contained in the Appendix and are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1 2004 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION RESULTS Intersection Traffic Control LOS 2004 N. Highland Ave. @ Union St. Signal C N. Highland Ave. @ Sunset Point Rd. Signal D AVID ENGINEERING, INC K:\projects\2000\2049001\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 4 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II..... .IJ0\ <4:./.1~...........~. D............lJ L:c::m::~:~:~~,:=. ~ YL... Palm Harbor, rlorido 34683 ENGINEERING. AW:: rel:(727) 7e9-95~ rOlC(727) 7ll4-6662 Our ctIIfIPM, nllllHt .,... frN "..,,_ .....OVId...g.com L76 -170 .18 NineD eD N 110 .J~L.. "'r7 74 J 'I t I 255 -- ::;; ~ :n 43+ N ~ r~'i~:ll r )> Z o RIDGELAND RD. )> r;;; L89 ,... ,... 01 .,. ~ -384 .J ~ L.. . 165 1'. 'Ill V 51 J 'I t I 462 -- :g 12 2 -....- 56+ I~ ~~ 14 N.r.S. UNION ST. SUNSET POINT RD. lU!~eMD 42""") -TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME ~ - SIGNAUZED INTERSEC110N 0 - UNSIGNAUZED INTERSEC110N EXISTING VOLUME (PM PEAK HOUR - RAW DATA) PROJECT: HIGHLAND TOWNHOMES APPLICANT: BAYSHORE BROADWAY DEVELOPERS COUNTY: PINELLAS I SHEET: 2 'l:: .! Gl .s::. :>. i :E c.. <') N <D <') '<i ~ o ~ i5 c5 z ~ CJ) ~ c; ~ d ~ I-;' Gl .6: "C c:: III :E Cl :E "6 IE ~ o o 01 .... o ~ o o o ~ t; w a r:r:: 9= ~ . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS The traffic characteristics of the proposed development were analyzed to aid in determining the access requirements and to evaluate the impact of the proposed development on the adjacent roadways. The traffic characteristics that were analyzed included: · The volume of traffic generated by the development. · The orientation of the development traffic on the area street system. All of the above characteristics are a function of the type and density of the proposed development. The proposed development will consist of 132 townhomes. The P.M. peak-hour trip estimates for this development were obtained by applying the appropriate rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. The Daily and PM peak hour trip generation estimates are shown on Tables 2 & 3 on the following pages. The directional distribution for the Highland Townhomes project traffic was based on the existing traffic patterns in the area. The directional distribution is shown graphically on Figure 3. The detailed site traffic assignment for the study intersections are shown on intersection spreadsheets contained in the Appendix. AVID ENGINEERING, INe K:\projects\2000\204900l\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 6 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I TABLE 2 I ITE Land-Use Category DAILY TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES (Highland Avenue) ITE Land-Use (Code) DESCRIPTION I F.UT:L;J~ :p'I;:\lEl;c)~MJ::NT::;: Townhomes Residential Condo/Townhome I ITE Trip Generation Manual, th Edition I I TABLE 3 ......... . ........ . Independent Variable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....,.............. . dwelling units 230 ITEtE DESCRIPTION PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES (Highland Avenue) ITE Land-Use Independent (Code) Variable I ITE Land-Use Category FutuRE:OeVELOPMENT::::::;:;:::::::::::::::::;:::::::::;:: . . Townhomes Residential Condo/Townhome I ITE Trip Generation Manual, th Edition I I I I I I I I I . .......... ....,...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 ITEtE . . . . . . . . -.... ............. dwelling units I AVID Engineering, Inc. i:\transportation\Highland Townhomes\Trip Generation (Highland Avenue)-132-UNfT-Ben Size Daily Daily 2-Way Trips Trips In (vpd) (vpd) :::: << 813 406 406 Daily Trips Out (vpd) 132 E = ITE Equation R = ITE Average Rate PM PK-HR PM PK-HR PM PK-HR Size 2-Way Trips Trips Trips (vph) In (vph) Out (vph) . . .. . ....... . 132 75 51 25 I I I E = ITE Equation R = ITE Average Rate Trip Generation 5/1/2004 4:40 PM ...... I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~@% I ~%f Z I RIDGELAND RD. G) r= )> z Cl )> ~ -1IL ~% ~%~W)% -1 ~% ~% r fIr ~% ~~% ~% ~ UNION ST. L ~~% SUNSET POINT RD. I ~% DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION I ~ CIllO EIIf1/nHr6 PlsnntNs Trsf/k; Eng/netNs A ~~)"iJ Lsndsl:SfHI Art:h/ttlt:ts Enrironmtmt. Eng/netNs ,4//D..;" 2JOO Curlew Rood. Suite 100 . . ....,......... Palm Harbor. Florida 34683 I ENGIllEERlNG, INC. TeI:(n7) 789-9500 Fax:(727) 784-6662 OUr OOIfIIMIIY ".".. .,.",. ftN "".,,_ .....avlden9.cam 1:: Ql .Q Ql ..<:: t .!!!, ~ Cl.. .... N ,:.: It) ~ v 0 0 ~ I in r: -H- Ql lD ~ z I 0 ~ N.T.S. W 0:: 0 Oi ~ d IE I!! ~ ~ <: III :E Cl :E -0 IE ~ 0 ~ v 0 g 0 0 15 t5 w ....., 0 0:: 9= ~ ~ID · · -NET-NEW ~% DISTRIBUTION PROJECT: HIGHLAND TOWNHOMES APPLICANT: BAYSHORE BROADWAY DEVELOPERS COUNTY: PINELLAS I SHEET: 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. FUTURE CONDITIONS Development Access Plan There is one access driveway proposed for the Highland Townhomes. The driveway connection to Highland Ave. is proposed to align with the existing Ridgeland Road, which serves a residential community. Back!!round Traffic Proiections The buildout year for this development is anticipated to be Year 2005. The adjusted base volumes were increased to account for general growth over the next year. An annual growth rate of 1 percent was applied over the one-year period2. The detailed assignment for the study intersections are shown on intersection spreadsheets contained in the Appendix. 2 MPO Staff, Pinellas County (a copy of historical growth is contained in the appendix) AVID ENGINEERING, lNe K:\projects\2000\2049001\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 9 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Post Development Analysis Intersection capacity analyses were performed at the study intersections based on the Year 2005 Total Traffic. The PM Peak-Hour net-new site traffic assignment is shown graphically on Figure 4. The P.M. peak hour site traffic volumes were added to the Year 2005 backgroWld traffic projections to establish the Post Development Projections. The post development projections are shown graphically in Figure 5. These volumes were analyzed with the existing intersection geometry and traffic control plans. A copy of the spreadsheets containing the pertinent volumes and assignment information for the study intersections are contained in the Appendix. To analyze the capacities at the study intersections, the HCS software for signalized and Wlsignalized intersections was utilized. The detailed HCS intersection analysis worksheets are contained in the Appendix and are summarized in Table 4 below. Table 4 2005 POST DEVELOPMENT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY Intersection Traffic Control LOS 2004 LOS 2005 N. Highland Ave. @Union St. Signal C C N. Highland Ave. @ Sunset Point Rd. Signal D D AVID ENGINEERING, lNe K:\projects\2000\2049001\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 10 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I To analyze the capacity for the roadway segment along N. Highland Ave. from Sunset Point Rd. to Union St., the ArtPlan 2002 software (multimodal arterial level of service) was utilized. With the addition of traffic from the 132 townhomes, conditions remain unchanged. The detailed ArtPlan arterial level of service analysis worksheets are contained in the Appendix and are summarized in Table 5 below. Table 5 2005 POST DEVELOPMENT ARTERIAL LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY EXISTING Segment (along N. Highland Ave.) Speed (mph) Sunset Point Rd. to Union S1. * 24.9 132 TOWNHOMES Segment (along N. Highland Ave.) Speed (mph) Sunset Point Rd. to Union S1.* 24.9 Segment LOS C Segment LOS C *Peak Direction of Flow - NB AVID ENGINEERING, INC K:\projects\2000\2049001\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 11 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ CMI E~ Pmnn.,." Tr.fflc E~ I .4f\... ~ '.... JJZ. r~i5J LIllldIlt:1IIH' =:: R:~:~'" Engb/llerll ~ ruL.... Palm Harbor. Florida J4683 ENt1/IEE1IING. JNC. rol:(n7) 789-9500 Fo"'(727) 784-6662 OUr _y _ .,.".. ftN /t8e1f_ ...._g.CDm ~ .' UNION ST. 1:: CD J:l CD ..c: t .!!!, :E 11. It> '" ~ ~ cO .... 0 0 ~ ill c: CD CD N '" ~ u: N.T.S. ~ I- W l- ii; cii ;: "C r.i IE e ~ ~ "C <: <ll :E CO :E 13 IE ~ 0 0 Q) .... 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ t w ..., 0 c:: 9. ~ It) 3. it, -,,- RIDGELAND RD. z ~ I L-C5 I ~ , o N .., )> ;$i Lg .'5 ~ - ~ . L6 SUNSET POINT RD. .J~L- 3..1 t .., N ~I!) 42. -TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUME ~ - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION D - UNSIGNAUZED INTERSECTION SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT 1132 Units) PROJECT: HIGHLAND TOWNHOMES APPLICANT: BAYSHORE BROADWAY DEVELOPERS COUNTY: PINELLAS SHEET: 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ C/rtII Engineers Pllmntml Tr.,fIt: EIIfI/nHI'S ~' ~~?J L6I1d~ An:hJt<<:ts Enll/rrmtnflllt./ Ent1/tIHn I ..4;,;0: 2300 Curlew Rood. Sullo 100 ..'. .,........ Palm Harbor. Florida 3468J ENGUlEERlNG, wa ToI:(n7) 789-9500 Fax:(n7) 784-6662 OUr _y n_ .fMId. frN "..,1... .....cMdOft9.com .... - Ul 111 UlNOO ~~L. " -.7 73.1 It, 252 - ~ :;j ~ 45. N L75 -168 .19 UNION ST. 1:: CD .c CD ..c: >. ~ CD -: ~ <0 0 N ..- 0 ..- ! 0 '" (i; I ill ,,0.. E: CD iJil aj I c , I- m N.T.S. 0 Q. ci ~ "C d ~ ~ ~ "C E: co :E C> .E "iJ IE ~ 0 0 '" ..r 0 ~ 0 0 0 115 ti UJ ...., ~ 9- ~ RIDGELAND RD. z ~ I L.~ )> z , o N )> .., < I'Tl L9 .15 ~ L94 00 .... N .... g ~ -380 ~ ~ L. .163 I" ,~ 54.1 It, 457 - :; C!i ~ -....- SUNSET POINT RD. 55. ~D 42 t -11JRNING MOVEMENT VOLUME ,. - SIGNALIZED U INTERSECTlON D - UNSIGNAUZED INTERSECTION POST DEVELOPMENT - TOTAL VOLUME (YEAR 2005) (132 Unitsl PROJECT: HIGHLAND TOWNHOMES APPLICANT: BAYSHORE BROADWAY DEVELOPERS COUNTY: PINELLAS SHEET: 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. CONCLUSION The proposed Highland Townhomes development is expected to generate approximately 75 two-way trips during the P.M. peak-hour. Under peak-season, peak-hour, post development conditions, the study intersections operate at an acceptable Level of Service during the P.M. peak hour. The access plan as proposed in this study will provide safe and efficient operation for the proposed development and adjacent roadways. AVID ENGINEERING, INe K:\projects\2000\2049001 \traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 14 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX AVID ENGINEERING, INe K:\projects\2000\2049001\traffic\Highland Ave. TIA 15 Highland Townhomes May 3, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~. ~ '-. ,...... r:: d. 04: 40 P A V IDE N G . I N C t.NI.:l PAGE 02 1".2 727-789-9593 2300 Curiew Road, Suitt: IOU Palm Harbor, f'L 34683 Phone (727) 789-9500 Fax. (727) 184-6662 www.a viden g.com LC-000036\ AuthOrizatioll #6139 ENGINEERING OUf company name; stands for itself. .. March 16, 2004 Bennett Elbo ':i.:y of Clearwater ~::-;:,.::ne Operations Engineer 100 South Myrtle Avenue, #220 Clearwater, FL 33756~5520 .Re: Highland Towohomes N. Highland Ave. - SOQth of Union St. Traffic Metbodology Letter Dear Ben: The purpose of this letter is to supply you with the proposed met~lodology for conducting traffic analyses required to support the rezoning application pending of this development. The proposed project is located on the eastside of N. Highland Ave., south of the intersection of Union StIN. Highland Ave. As a part of the proposed traffic analyses the following tasks will be performed: ;;', At this time we anticipate the following intersections will need to be evaluate;d: Intenectiolls L N. Highland Ave. @ Sun.setPoint Rd. 2. N. Highland Ave. @UnionSt. \/2. Conduct new PM peak hom turning moveID~nt counts for the intersections listed above. /., 1-: .J. Evaluate the existing level of service at the two study intersections and adjacent 3.1terial. The latest version ofHCM soflv/are and ArtPlan 2002 will be utilized. ,/4. Determine th.e Daily and PM trip characteristics of the proposed development. The trip generation rates for the development will be based on the rates contained in the ITE Trip Geperation Manual, in EditioI1. The directional distribution will be basecl on the cx:1sting travel patterns/traffic counts in the vicinity of the l;ite and the above mentioned roadway improvements. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :,.::-:-- 1:.1'i<.:l PAGE 03 p.3 ~,S 04 04:40p AVID ENG. INC 727-7El9~S593 February 1,2004 Traffic Methodolo~:Letter '.. . .'..-' ". ..--.........."".-'.-....--..... Van Dyke Cop:unons - N. Dale Mabry Highway at Van Dyke Road - Southeast Corner --"., r 5. Assign. tfie.p(QPosed,~developmeti.nraffic 'jrotti' tho' clevelopme!ltJQ, 1:h~S!~~_,driv~ways and the study intersections. V6. Evaluate the future Year 2005 PM peak hour traffic level of services conditions (existing + growth + site traffic) at the site driveways and study intersections. This will include an arterial analysis for the section of Highland Ave. from Sunset Point Rd. to Union S1. Two levels of development will be evaluated; · Level I (52 units) · Level II (132 units) -./7. Prepare a teclmical report for submittal to the City of Clearwater. The report will document the procedures; findings; and recorr.unen~ation:" of our study. . . d ~~ J "jJ?1,/JJ1t ~ r HeN So(IrH'It- 11'1 -o.i.f/o/P..." rj,'If..tJ(, .,4. sutJ'C;{lJ (;iJ{J :f 6JfJCJ4 -/ k .lt/( y-r; Please' review this methodology presented above for completeness and if acceptable, execute in the space provided below and return to our office. Please contact me if you have any questions or c011UTl.ents. SincerelYl Avid Engineering, be. CJ-6'~. ::z 1>. Calder.., PE. . ./ :Jirec,tor of Transportation Services t ~tfL - . Bennett Elbo Traffic Operations Engin~cr City of Clearwater I:\Trnasportation\highlaTld A vc:nue\M erhodology.Highland A ve..doc 2 AYmc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS Intersection (N/S): N. Highland Avenue Intersection (E/W): Sunset Point Date: 3/15/2004 Weather: Rain Counter: TP N . hi dA S P' S p. N. Hil!hland Avenue .Hlg an venue unset omt unset omt NB SB ED WB Start End R T L R T L R T L R T L TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 42 85 33 16 85 34 19 135 13 25 101 29 617 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 33 108 17 10 74 26 13 108 12 24 100 52 577 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 18 86 29 8 40 29 13 82 8 19 84 32 448 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 87 106 29 13 98 30 11 137 18 21 99 52 701 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 56 130 42 5 83 22 23 114 14 22 83 51 645 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 58 124 45 13 111 24 30 105 8 26 56 29 629 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 37 103 36 14 74 27 13 64 3 14 62 18 465 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 25 88 24 7 70 15 3 61 3 8 22 20 346 Total Cor: 4:00 PM Total Cor: 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 180 176 108 147 47 39 119 88 462 344 51 28 89 70 384 223 165 118 297 338 56 69 385 445 Peak Hour Volumes Southbound 47 297 119 1 N. Hi hland Avenue = .. 89 "CI :I = .;; ;e :l llo Q .. .. ~ 384 oS .. .. .. :; ~ :I :I :I ~ ~ ~ ~- 165 N. ,".>lr ...... 108 385 180 Northbound 5/1/2004 "CI = :l Q oS '" OJ 1";1 51- 462 ----+ 56 ~ i:\transportation\highland townhomes\Highland@Sunset TMC's - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \AI 1,_ ~ Ji-L rh.<f~ {)'In > ~} ~~ It!7 ~(~ ri I 30S<0 A YDf<~ -/ p~? I ().n SFiL ~ 5?[~~1 p-t ---- ... ~ . .J-.- ~ ... ~ ~ t ) ~ N ~~ -~ ~ tJV.-L. . J l .r ~ ~\ c; () 5e c- 7 () )' e .::::- 90 7a' C- TIP 3j;s '~-----~I / , )FJ?-- ~ -~ }~~J ,1 X /'. " / I CC~. . -::::::-- ./ .~K~~ . r1" 'L{ r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT ANALYSIS AUTOS & TRUCKS Intersection (N/S): N. Highland Ave. Intersection (EIW): Union St. Date: 3/1512004 Weather: Rain Counter: JH N. Highland Ave. N. Hi~hland Ave. Union St. Union St. NB SB EB WB Start End R T L R T L R T L R T L TOTAL 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 24 92 11 34 97 50 14 86 30 39 43 6 526 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 9 47 6 5 38 11 5 31 10 8 23 3 196 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 14 62 14 13 55 10 15 61 18 16 46 6 330 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 10 47 6 10 61 15 9 77 16 13 58 3 325 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 17 70 8 8 47 18 13 85 16 14 46 7 349 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 21 65 8 14 39 23 11 93 15 12 55 6 362 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 13 57 11 7 41 13 9 70 10 8 37 4 280 5:45 PM 6:00 PM 11 29 9 6 31 11 9 76 9 9 31 5 236 Total for: 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 57 248 37 62 251 86 43 255 74 76 170 18 Total for: 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 62 221 36 35 158 65 42 324 50 43 169 22 Southbound Peak Hour Volumes 62 251 86 1 N. Hi hland Ave. "Cl 74- 76 "Cl = ... iij = = "-' = ~ = = ~ 255 ---+ 4 170 .Q .Q .. .S .... .... 'c = :l '" " ;:l ;:l ~ r.'l 43-~ 18 / N. HT' A.. 37 248 57 Northbound i:\transportation\highland townhomes\Highland@Union TMC's - - 5/1/2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AviR 2300 Curlew Road Palm Harbor, FL 34683 727-789-9500 fax 727-784-6662 Project No.: Made by: Checked by: Subject: ~ u "'t ~. ~ ") ~ <2i ~(j I::: .~ ~ ~ so '2 S . = I....:J i=- " 1. " ...J -' :g -" '-' .~ ;:e: ",\ "?, ....J )>> 9: "" ,., J:- "2- ? <= 1 Ylrf';' f>I \J \'TJ M:\J t.\o.~ , J \ L~ , 1-a:D <--1- <: V \1.) ~ ~. ~ --(JXJ r ~ ..-.----- \ -5 0 ~ cDJ-- .tx6 " -y-;> X>>- I ~\ v \' r) I I I ;t -c I i-' l. ."J ? i .~ '-""" I d- \\A;"7, f'''JI "1..:1( (0\'-' 1.,\0,..).., \:""~'J"': \iL.,J ii'lL\ Sheet of Date: Date: II /:; L.\-- 1 ~ jo "ih ---.:::::... ---~--~-----:---.----.... IJ iJ \ ~ t..j'-~'~'~ :~. INITlA.I... 01 r.: 5 5 S ~r 5 5 5 ,/ .:) PASSA.GE 02 3 5 3 5 5 5 :3 .5 ! YELLOW 03 ::< 3,b 3 3.G .3 3,~ ? 3,G ',-' ....." ~ RED CLEAR 04 f ~ G 2.7 2.5 ') 7 '.6 2.1 2.5 1'MM-3-)-2 2.7 1- . MAX 1 05 )S' 28 /2- 2~ is 28 IZ Z.6 MAX 2 06 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 i , i 7 /1 0 7 , WALK 07 D 0 0 FL DON'T WK ot! 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 J(jJ J MlN RECALL 09 (...1 I 0 0 0 I () () MAX . RECALL 10 .. CI 0 0 0 () 0 0 0 )1 . i 1 PEDRECALL II 0 D 0 b 0 c) d 0 i /MM-3-1-3 NON-LOCKING 12 I (J r 0 I (') ) 0 CNA-I 13 () ( Q 0 0 I 0 0 . " 1 CNA -2 14 0 I 0 0 0 I C) ('J ! PHASE OMIT ]6 r l SOFT RECALL 1& I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INT# ". ......... ~'...' ,..' ~: Intersection II,/," I \ I c',.;. ~ t l..:.) t... 'u. ."', _ :..J :7'~!..'\SE I PHASE 2 ti':~ fiL/I^ 12.;;, ,.Ii ('../oIl. i\~..(~) S \)\J \ t::'1~ SUN ~ c;- POIN T' 4/(~ I! 'T. ?k-!A~ SE 3 PHASE 4 INTERVAL !~aE!... J880 EL PROGRAM .[v:Qyl - 3 - 3 - 2 .PED ASSIGNMENT (NOT ON 1 EgO-EL) SPEClA.L PROG. EXIT FROM UCF START UP PHASES - ~..' . , .1. ."~'._'"'_ -, ...> ~ .;0 - ENTR Y INTO VCF CONTROLLER ID. # DUAL EN"rn. Y u :"-0( - : . j - 1 I LOCAL PICK~UP =~ DUALENTRY O=OFF .1:::RmGl t:.1'I\:I PAGE 04 City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Division Traffic Signal ControUer Timing Data Effective Dale //').. .,;;.1/.. ('.: t;).J C . -, \ - ~'. at .. , ,::.,,;. )kl'~~ ('" ()".; .. '<..' 'j' _....1... ..... PHASE 5 PHASE 6 PHASE 7 PHASE 8 If I i;.. ,~/ /.,./! f. L H'(;.!lL-./.\N) SV/..j ~ C i- .j""'~:\ i t' ,=;;!.j~.J" r~'- ~,::.~r,; (': / 1 ~, :...:r' SiI EBLT we t>Je i",),B LT ~Q3 18110 E I'HASE PHASE PHAsE: PHASE PHASE I'HASE PRASE PHASE 1 2 3 '" 5 6 7 II 1880 E 0-13 4-6 0-27 0-0 0-29 2-; 0-30 2"t; 0-31 4-A '.,t 0-87 4 0-9S -:;) -..J 8-24 I 2=R.lNG 2 3=RING l & 2 DIP SWITCHES ON 2341)67@ ADDmONAL INFORMATION Pl~ b Ij-1cc"t r i" i \(.~"n N~ t. J ". f'.1 ....L l . HI! ~ ~~ :,1 : f '..:':,'. .' . ,. }, r (c' , f:-'. ':"".1"f " "'-0._ "." REV 8-96 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lNT # -.:;, q 3 City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Division Traffic Signal Controller Timing Data Effective Date 3 -;2'7i-oc: mtersection ~ .1 t G H l..F\ t..J.~. at lJ (1...1\ ()!".'<l. PHASE 1 f! I (:':'II\..Ili".\~ "':+/,.(:,,:, '2' \..1 I G ,- ! L I) ~J t, "-I i?,>l~ T SB we PHASE 5 HIGH t,;\ "-, 'D PHASE 6 HI (,.1-1 L !'Il-..l ~ PHASE 7 PHASE g - U i'J\ OI..J S8LT N8 :~::'_'~,.~f},IS2 1 .::~'~;.ASE 4. U ~ \ 0 N ES '.?'~OBL INTERVAL PHASE PHASE PHASE PHASE PljASE PRAsE PHASE PHASE 1330 E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R .- lNlTIAL 01 :; IS 7 5 15 1 PASSAGE: 02 2 S :.3 2 5 3- YELLOW 03 3 ,3.G 3? 3 ~.G 3.2 ~- RED CLEAR 04 2.7 2.,' 2..7 "='7 2. I 2.'7 '- , MM~3-1.2 MAX 1 05 ) 14 30 25 / , 4 "30 25 MAX '). 06 () C> 0 0 0 0 WALK 07 0 7 7 0 7 ry Ft DON'T WK 08 0 1f7 J!t 0 17 IfiJ I MlN RECALL 09 () I 0 0 j 0 MAX ., RECALL .10 O. 0 () D- o 0 ! PED RECAll,. 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 .' NON-LOCKlNG 12 , t> , I 0 I [MM-3-1-; CNA -1 13 0 , o. 0 .1 .0 . CNA. -2 14 0 t> 0 b 0 0 PHAsE OMIT 16 0 0 () 0 (.I 0 .< , 0 1 SOFT RECALL 18 0 0 r'\ Q 0 ':-' r---- 1880 EL PROGRAM 1880 E . EXIT FROM trCF 0-29 2...-0' STAAT UP PHASEs 0-30 2.-~ EN1RY INTo UCF 0,31 4 -8 CONTROllER lD. # 0-&7 5 DUAL ENTRy 0-98 :::- LOCAL PICK-uP 8-24 I DlP SWITCBES ON 1234cV67(D ADDIDONAL lNFORMAIJON N BL.:T l "? rcc.. ....\'i.I~t.{'-.,.1 I.>.C'_ S8LT S ~ ~ - ...... -. I, VIl'." 1 MM:-3-1-1 lvfM-3-3-1 ~0.IOo~. r::~_.I\"llr~'~", -1'-;-.:,,.. 1::' S 'T~..I "'Te.c. REV 8-96 I ~ ONlJ,NE''i.o;ai'li4htANO''' tit. '.1'.... I'.. ............ ., ~."..' ~. -I II E- .1:1" ~r ,=', "i ter subPha ~~lt)..llIf.J betect L ; n ks I I I I I I I I I I I 0388 Semi actuat.ed .... Du~ 1 "HIGHLAND" and"SUNsET PT" Plan ~ valid Y see % Continuous command 00000000 . Split only Contr N Cyclical command 000060'00 cycle len~th cyclical phase NONE A-phase 0 fset 058 57 ere disabled y Yield point off set OB4 83 Dual permissive N A-Phase sp 1 i t 032 31 Permissive subphase .1;F15 Minimum cycle 068 Permissive % 036 . . subphase .Cycle Miniml:.lmstreetGreenN:. . Associated table: 1 Transit priority N A-subphases 1 cycle - r(splits) = .,0 subphases 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Identification TF26 TF37 TF47 iF38 TF48 TF15 TF25 TF16'. SkipPable/Alt. N y YjA Y!A .y y y/A ~ 'r/A: Split (see) 032 020 000 000 030 018 000 ;qpo Split ( % ) 31 19 00 00 29 17 00 00:.. Min split (see) 032 01~ 000 000 012' 012 000 000 . Min subph (see) 032 012 000 00.0 012 012 000 000., I I I I I I I I I I I SemiactuaLed - Dual Ring "HIGHLAND" and "UNION" Plan ~ valid Y Split only Contr N cycle length A-phase offset: Yield point: offset A-phase sp 1 it Minimum cycle see % 1 0 003 02 037 36 040 39 053 ASsociated subphase t:able: 1 A-SLlbphases 1 subphases g 1 2 Identificat:ion skippablejAl1:. Split (see) split ( % ) Min split (see) Min subph (set) TF26 N 040 -39 027- 027 TF48 Y 040 39 014 014 3 TF15 Y 020 19 012 012 Continuous command OOOOQOOO Cyclical command 00000000 cyclical phase NONE eIe disabled y Dual permissive N permissive subphase TF48 Permissive % 050 Cycle MinimumStreetGreen Transit priority N Cycle - I(splits) = 0 4 5 TF25 Y/A 000 00 000 000 TF16 Y/A 000 00 000 000 I~.,~;~:-~; I,~\~iil .. V FAX TRANSMISSION II PINELLAS COUNTY - ~TROPOLITAN ..:Jj h~ II~..~.'. PLANNING ORGANIZATION 600 CLEVELA..~ STREET, SlJITE 750 1;1 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 I I~ (727) 4~~:2~~27~~C4~~~O~70-8200 , I~ I.':~ ~ ,", ',~,', 11i . Comments: I~ -~----~-- .1.'/.".' q ::1%1 I.,., :. .. 't!1, Ii ~ Ij~~. I I"..'.' ~:;~.( PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNING 727 464 4155 P.01/02 IVIP~ - . . - - -- - --- - -- - -- - - -- - - -- -- - - -. - --- ." '". '. . Date 3-18-6LJ To Whom Sent: .AVlD ENbIA1EEP-J"tb EL\X # 7~Lf - cP002 Pages: ~(including this Cover sheet) from whom sent: /MAFZ.c- t-1A-f-lkf:32- Subject: ..BH2.!ibi3:~D _,,"~LJjj / G D F U^-tl en Sl- (Please call, if this transmission is unreadable or missing pages). -....~.._,.--....-, ."~""""""~'. ."- ....,...~................... .....--...--........,.... elVED MAR 1 B 2004 ~E~9;~~-;~ ....--..--.--..--..............-.......-- ............,. ...."'........--~--.--..-. "'-... .,.... ...~.. -_....'-.-r....o.r.......~_. --..... ..~.,---'..... --.......-,... .........._-_....,-,~........... .. ...........----.-.-..--., ~_.._._~._-............-.--. ---......___...........n....r.. ......_ --- ;. ,-- -~..._-~-~.,..,-~.,,---_....----. --_.~. ~ .-'-' .-..~_...._..._-...., '- --....... '--.-".,. -'~-'."'.'~' ---- :~. :'~'8~~"'"""-c" .j r ..~\. . y.' ., ...I--.~p' I ,'I 'c , H:L\MPO-FAX-New1.cdr, PMWs, 5/11'03_ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~AR-1B-2004 13:32 :;'::U:'1t Station: CL29 Roadway: HIGHLAND AV Location: S OF UNION ST PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNING Count Station Regression Report Pinellas County MPO 727 464 4155 P.02/02 Report Date: 3/18/2004 History Start Year: 1991 History End Year: 2001 Future Growth Rate (FGR): 1_0026 (Calculate ~ .i Regression Summary: Regression Growth Rate: 1.0026 Slope: 38.42 Intercept -62,021.61 Historical Count Data Summary: Year Study Date Source AADT PeakT oDaily PSDT 2001 7/3112001 CLWTR 15,200 0.0790 15,200 ZOOO 8/1/2000 CLWTR 16,387 0.0770 16,387 .1999 5/13/1999 CLWTR 13,956 0.0750 13,956 1998 5/12/1998 CLWTR .12,755 0,0810 12,755 1997 4/17 f1 ~97 CLWTR 11,699 0.0000 11,699 1996 5/9/1996 CLWTR 15,848 0.0780 15.848 1996 4/18/1996 CLWTR 16,204 0.0960 16,204 1995 5/16/1995 CLWTR 16,087 0.0790 16,087 1994 4/28f1994 CLWTR 15,296 0.0770 15,296 1993 5/4/1993 CLWTR 14,729 0,0000 . 14,729 1992 5/21/1992 Cl WTR 13,327 0.0000 13,327 1991 5/29/1991 CLWTR 14,445 0.0000 14,445 'i 18000 LJ. 16000 .I ! 14000 ~_. 12000 I . !, " ~ , i .-.j 1 I 6000 I I 4000 I I I . 2000 l----.I..-. I ! o i . 1,991 1,992 ~ l -' .... :> l- e ~ 10000 I . '". BOOO I I ....:hi'.... . :""':''f;:!~f~ i J ..'.'--1------ i . ! I i I . J .. '. ~. . ! i I , I i I ....t-------T .1.993 1,9941,&95 Regression Graph: i I ,.... .--! I - --.--1 I ; i I ~----+--.~--1 , -- . J I ' .__i__.____ .I. . I r-- ; : -MDT i -Regree5ion I --$igm31 I -Sigm32 l---.-: I I I I J I I -r-----.--.-: -..... ..-... J I I I I I I . --..---.-+---.t 1-1---.......-1.. . I. . ..--- 00.-1 . I , I I ' , I I I :. I 1......._.--- _....!._._.~ . ..J 1.996 1.997 1,998 1,999 2,000 2,001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N. Highland Ave. @ Sunset Point Rd. - PM Peak Hour Movement SBRt SBTh SB LI SB TaL WBRt WBTh WBLI WB TaL NBRt NBTh NBLI NB TaL EBRt EBTh EB LI EB TaL InL Total }2004 Pm peak-hour 47 297 119 463 89 384 185 638 180 3B5 108 673 56 462 51 569 2,343 i2oo4 PM Peak Season -1 -6 -2 -9 -2 -8 -3 -13 -4 -8 -2 -13 .1 -9 -1 -11 (47) Growth (l-year) 0 3 1 5 1 4 2 6 2 4 1 7 1 5 1 6 23 I200s Peak Season Bkgd Traffic 47 294 118 458 88 380 163 632 178 381 107 666 55 457 50 563 2.320 2004 Peak Season 48 291 117 454 87 378 162 625 176 377 lOB BBO 55 453 50 558 2,296 Po....nt Ill""'bntlnn Stte Tl1ps ll% out 40% out 18% out 11% In 0% 0% 0% 46% In 0% 0% 0% 6% in Pass--By 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% p~I.'" T~ns Site Trips 1 10 4 8 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 3 Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 005 Total Post Oev. Traffic 48 304 122 474 94 380 163 637 176 404 107 690 55 457 54 588 2,367 External Trip Generation Imi!UIlI!l! PM IN PM OlJT TOT sno Trips 51 25 75 If'ass-Bv 0 0 0 % Growth = 1.0% No. of Years = 1 Peak Season Factor = 0.98 AVID Engineering, Inc. i:llransportationlhighland townhomeslTrip Generalion (Highland Avenue)-132-UNIT-Ben Hlghland@Sunset 51312004 12:50 PM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N. Highland Ave. @ Union 51. . PM Peak Hour Movement SBRI SBTh SBlt SB ToL WBRI WBTh WBlt WB ToL NBRI NBTh NB lt NB TaL EBRI EBTh EBlt EB ToL InL Total 2004 Pm peak-hour 62 251 88 399 78 170 18 284 57 248 37 342 43 255 74 372 1,377 004 PM Peak Season -1 -5 -2 -8 -2 -3 0 -5 -1 -5 -1 -7 -1 -5 -1 -7 (28) Growth (1-vear) 1 3 1 4 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 0 3 1 4 14 005 Peak Season Bkgd Traffic 81 248 85 395 75 188 18 261 56 246 37 339 43 252 73 368 1,363 2004 Peak Season 61 248 84 391 74 167 18 259 56 243 38 335 42 250 73 365 1,349 Percent DIstr1hn'lnn Sne T~ps 0% 30% In 0% 0% 0% 2% In 6% out 27% out 4% out 5% In 0% 0% IPass-By 0% 0% 0% 0% O",{, 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% IIProled Trine sne Trips 0 15 0 0 0 1 1 7 1 3 0 0 Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2005 Total Post Dev. Traffic 61 284 85 410 75 188 19 262 58 252 38 348 45 252 73 371 1,391 External Trip Generation ~ PM IN PM OUT TOT Slle T~ps 51 25 75 Pas&-Bv 0 0 0 % Growth = 1.0% No. of Years = 1 Peak Season Factor = 0.98 AVID Engineenng, Inc. i:llransportationlhighland lownhomeslTrip Generation {Highland Avenue)-132-UNIT-Ben Hlghland@Union 51312004 12:50 PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I untitled HCS2000: signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: TSP Agency: AVID Date: 3/17/2004 period: PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING PK SE project ID: HIGHLAND AVENUE TOWNHOMES E/W St: SUNSET POINT Inter.: HIGHLAND AVE @ SUNSET PT Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF CLEARWATER Year 2004 - peak Season N/S St: HIGHLAND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I I I 1 No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 0 LGconfig I L TR I L TR I L T R I L TR volume 150 453 55 1162 376 87 1106 377 176 1117 291 46 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR vol I 0 I 20 I 30 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas phase combination signal operations 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A peds X 1 Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A peds X 1 Peds X NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 8.0 34.0 7.0 28.3 yellow 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.6 All Red 2.7 2.5 2.7 1.6 cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection performance summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/c Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 274 1761 0.20 0.48 17.8 B TR 622 1830 0.91 0.34 48.6 D 45.8 D westbound L 222 1763 0.81 0.48 40.9 D TR 618 1817 0.80 0.34 37.1 D 38.1 D Northbound L 283 1757 0.42 0.41 21. 5 c T 527 1863 0.80 0.28 41.4 D 35.2 D R 440 1556 0.37 0.28 29.2 c Southbound L 247 1759 0.53 0.41 23.4 c TR 515 1820 0.73 0.28 37.4 D 33.8 c Intersection Delay = 38.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Hcs2000: signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I phone: E-Mail: untitled OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Fax: Analyst: TSP Agency/co. : AVID Date Performed: 3/17/2004 Analysis Time period~ PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING PK SE Intersection: HIGHLAND AVE @ SUNSET PT Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: CITY OF CLEARWATER Analysis Year: 2004 - Peak Season Project ID: HIGHLAND AVENUE TOWNHOMES East/west Street North/south Street SUNSET POINT HIGHLAND AVENUE VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I L T R I Volume 150 453 55 % Heavy vehl2 2 2 PHF 10.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 vol 114 126 15 Hi Ln vol I % Grade 0 Ideal Sat 1900 1900 parkExist Numpark No. Lanes LGconfig Lane Width RTOR Vol Adj Flow %InsharedLn prop LTs Prop RTs Peds Bikes Buses 0 %InProtphase 0.0 Duration 0.25 1 Westbound I L T R I 1162 376 87 12 2 2 10.90 0.90 0.90 145 104 24 I I 0 11900 1900 I 1 I 110 I L TR 112.0 12.0 I 1180 492 1 11.000 0.000 I 0.150 I 10 0 10 0 I 0.0 Area Type: All other 1 1 L TR 12.0 12.0 o 56 564 1. 000 o. 000 0.108 10 o o o 20 Northbound L T R southbound L T R 106 377 176 117 291 46 222 222 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 29 105 49 33 81 13 o 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 111 L T R 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 30 1118 419 162 I 11. 000 O. 000 I 0 . 000 1. 000 I 10 0 10 0 0 I 0.0 areas OPERATING PARAMETERS 110 I L TR 112.0 12.0 I 0 1130 374 I 11. 000 O. 000 I 0.136 I 10 0 10 0 I 0.0 I Eastbound I westbound I Northbound I southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I I I I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 13 3 13 4 3 13 4 uni tExt. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I Factor I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ext of 9 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 ped Min 9 I 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 PHASE DATA phase combination 1 3 2 4 I Page 2 5 6 7 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I untitled EB Left A A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 34.0 7.0 28.3 yellow 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.6 All Red 2.7 2.5 2.7 1.6 cycle Length: 100.0 sees Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Untitled HCs2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: JLH Agency: Avid Engineering Date: 3/17/2004 period: PM peak (4-6 PM) - EXISTING project 10: Highland Townhomes E/W St: union St. Inter.: N. Highland Ave. @ union St. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: city of clearwater Year 2004 - Peak Season N/S St: N. Highland Ave. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 westbound 1 Northbound I southbound 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 1 I I 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 L TR 1 L TR I L T R I L T R 173 250 42 118 167 74 136 243 56 184 246 61 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 NO. Lanes LGconfig volume Lane width RTOR vol Duration phase combination 1 EB Left A Th ru A Right A Peds X WB Left A Thru A Ri ght A Peds X NB Right SB Right Green yellow All Red Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group capacity Eastbound L 285 TR 579 westbound L 239 TR 561 Area Type: All other areas signal operations 2 3 4 1 I NB 1 I 1 1 SB 1 1 1 1 EB 1 WB 10.0 8.0 30.0 3.0 3.0 3.3 2.7 0.0 2.1 cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance summary Adj sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) 0.25 32.0 3.2 2.7 v/c g/c 891 1810 0.28 0.32 0.56 0.32 746 1752 0.08 0.32 0.48 0.32 Northbound L 651 T 764 R 620 Southbound L 503 1750 0.18 T 559 1863 0.49 R 452 1507 0.15 Intersection Delay = 25.0 1753 1863 1512 0.06 0.35 0.10 Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Right Right Delay LOS 26.0 C 29.4 c 23.9 c 27.9 c o . 57 10. 3 0.41 18.3 0.41 18.2 0.40 19.2 0.30 29.0 0.30 25.8 (sec/veh) 5 A 6 A A A A 7 A A A X A A A X 8 secs Delay LOS 28.7 c 27.7 C B B 17.4 B B B C 26.4 C C Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: signalized Intersections Release 4.1c page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I phone: E-Mail: untitled OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Fax: Analyst: JLH Agency/co.: Avid Engineering Date performed: 3/17/2004 Analysis Time period: PM peak (4-6 PM) - EXISTING Intersection: N. Highland Ave. @ union St. Area Type: A 11 other areas Jurisdiction: city of clearwater Analysis Year: 2004 - Peak Season project ID: Highland Townhomes East/west Street North/south Street union St. N. Highland Ave. VOLUME DATA I Eastbound 1 L T R I Volume 173 250 42 % Heavy vehl2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 Vol 20 69 12 Hi Ln vol % Grade. 0 Ideal sat 1900 1900 parkExist NumPark No. Lanes LGconfig Lane Width RTOR vol Adj Flow %InSharedLn Prop LTs Prop RTs Peds Bi kes Buses 0 %Inprotphase Duration 0.25 1 1 L TR 12.0 12.0 o 81 325 1. 000 0.000 0.145 10 o 10 westbound L T R 18 167 74 222 0.90 0.90 0.90 5 46 21 o 1900 1900 o 1 1 L TR 12.0 12.0 o 1 Northbound 1 L T R 1 136 243 56 12 2 2 0.90 0.90 0.90 10 68 16 I southbound I L T R 1 184 246 61 12 2 2 0.90 0.90 0.90 23 68 17 o 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 o 111 L T R 12.0 12.0 12.0 o 40 270 62 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 10 10 000 0.0 0.0 areas 111 L T R 12.0 12.0 12.0 o 93 273 68 1. 000 O. 000 o . 000 1. 000 10 10 000 0.0 1 Eastbound I westbound 1 Northbound 1 southbound 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I I I 1 Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 13 3 13 4 3 13 4 3 uni tExt. I 3 .0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 1 Factor I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 I 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 ped Min g I 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 1 3.2 Area Type: All other phase combination 1 20 268 1. 000 O. 000 0.306 10 o 10 o OPERATING PARAMETERS PHASE DATA 2 3 4 I page 2 5 6 7 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I untitled HCS2000: signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: TSP Agency: AVID Date: 3/17/2004 period: PM PEAK HOUR POST project ID: HIGHLAND AVENUE TOWNHOMES E/W St: SUNSET POINT 1 Eastbound 1 L T R 1 1 1 1 0 1 L TR 154 457 55 112.0 12.0 1 0 No. Lanes LGconfig volume Lane Width RTOR vol Inter.: HIGHLAND AVE @ SUNSET PT Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF CLEARWATER Year 2005 N/S St: HIGHLAND AVENUE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 westbound I Northbound I L T R I L T R I I 1 110 I I L TR I L 1163 380 94 1107 112.0 12.0 112.0 I 20 I I Southbound I L T R I 1 1 1 0 1 L TR 1122 304 48 112.0 12.0 1 0 1 1 1 T R 104 178 12.0 12.0 30 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas signal operations phase combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds X I Peds X WB Left A A I SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds X 1 Peds X NB Ri ght 1 EB Ri ght SB Right 1 WB Right Green 8.0 34.0 7.0 28.3 yellow 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.6 All Red 2.7 2.5 2.7 1.6 cycle Length: 100.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp capacity (s) v/c g/c Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 266 TR 622 westbound L 218 TR 616 Northbound L 270 T 527 R 440 southbound L 483 TR 515 1762 1830 1763 1813 1758 1863 1556 1746 1821 secs 0.23 0.91 0.48 0.34 18.1 B 49.9 D 46.8 D 0.83 0.82 0.48 0.34 44.0 D 38.7 D 40.1 D 0.44 0.22 0.37 0.28 0.76 0.41 0.28 0.28 0.41 0.28 21. 9 c 27.6 c 29.3 c 19.3 B 39.2 D 26.6 C 34.1 C Intersection Delay = 38.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS2000: signalized Intersections Release 4.1c page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I phone: E-Mail: untitled OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Fax: Analyst: TSP Agency/co.: AVID Date Performed: 3/17/2004 Analysis Time period: PM PEAK HOUR POST Intersection: HIGHLAND AVE @ SUNSET PT Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: CITY OF CLEARWATER Analysis Year: 2005 project ID: HIGHLAND AVENUE TOWNHOMES East/west Street North/south Street SUNSET POINT HIGHLAND AVENUE VOLUME DATA I westbound 1 L T R I 1163 380 94 222 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 106 26 o 1900 1900 1 Eastbound 1 L T R 1 volume 154 457 55 % Heavy vehl2 2 2 PHF 10.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 vol 115 127 15 Hi Ln vol 1 % Grade I 0 Ideal Sat 11900 1900 ParkExist 1 Numpark I No. Lanes I 1 1 0 LGConfig 1 L TR Lane Width 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I Adj Flow /60 569 %InSharedLnl prop L Ts 11. 000 0.000 prop RTs 1 0.107 Peds Bikesl 10 0 Buses 10 0 %InProtphase 0.0 Duration 0.25 o 1 1 L TR 12.0 12.0 20 181 504 11. 000 O. 000 I 0.163 I 10 0 10 0 I 0.0 Area Type: All other Northbound L T R 107 104 178 222 0.90 0.90 0.90 30 29 49 1 southbound 1 L T R I 1122 304 48 12 2 2 10.90 0.90 0.90 I 34 84 13 I o 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 o 111 L T R 12.0 12.0 12.0 30 119 116 164 1. 000 O. 000 I 0 . 000 1. 000 I 10 0 10 0 0 I 0.0 areas OPERATING PARAMETERS 110 L TR 12.0 12.0 o 136 391 1. 000 O. 000 0.136 10 0 o 0 0.0 1 Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound I southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 L T R I 1 1 I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 13 3 13 4 3 13 4 Uni tExt. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 I Factor I 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ext of 9 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 ped Min 9 I 3.2 1 3.2 1 3.2 I 3.2 PHASE DATA phase combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 page 2 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 'I Untitled EB Left A A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A peds x Peds X WB Left A A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 34.0 7.0 28.3 yellow 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.6 All Red 2.7 2.5 2.7 1.6 Cycle Length: 100.0 sees page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Untitled HCs2000: signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: JLH Agency: Avid Engineering Date: 3/17/2004 period: PM Peak (4-6 PM) - Future project ID: Highland Townhomes E/W St: union St. Inter.: N. Highland Ave. @ Union St. Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: city of clearwater Year 2005 N/S St: N. Highland Ave. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R I I I I 1 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I L TR I L TR 1 L T R I L T R 173 252 45 119 168 75 138 252 58 185 264 61 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 1 2 341 5 6 7 8 A I NB Left A A A A 1 Thru A A A 1 Right A A X I Peds X A I SB Left A A A 1 Thru A A 1 Right A X 1 Peds X I EB Right 1 WB Right 32.0 10.0 8.0 30.0 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.3 2.7 2.7 0.0 2.1 Cycle Length: 100.0 sees Intersection performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/c Delay LOS Delay LOS No. Lanes LGconfig volume Lane Width RTOR vol Duration 0.25 phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green yellow All Red Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group capacity Eastbound L 284 TR 579 westbound L 235 TR 560 886 1808 0.29 0.32 0.57 0.32 734 1751 0.09 0.32 0.48 0.32 Northbound L 636 T 764 R 620 southbound L 500 1750 0.19 T 559 1863 0.52 R 452 1507 0.15 Intersection Delay = 25.2 1754 1863 1512 0.07 0.37 0.10 26.0 c 29.6 c 24.0 c 28.0 c 10.5 B 18.4 B 18.2 B 28.9 c 27.7 C 0.57 0.41 0.41 0.40 19.2 B 0.30 29.6 c 26.9 c 0.30 25.8 c (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 17.5 B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I phone: E-Mail: untitled OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Fax: Analyst: JLH Agency/co.: Avid Engineering Date Performed: 3/17/2004 Analysis Time period: PM Peak (4-6 PM) - Future Intersection: N. Highland Ave. @ union St. Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: city of Clearwater Analysis Year: 2005 Project ID: Highland Townhomes East/west Street North/south Street union St. N. Highland Ave. VOLUME DATA I Eastbound I L T R I volume 173 252 45 % Heavy vehl2 2 2 PHF 10.90 0.90 0.90 PK 15 vol 20 70 13 Hi Ln vol % Grade 0 Ideal Sat 1900 1900 ParkExist NumPark No. Lanes LGConfig Lane width RTOR vol Adj Flow %InsharedLn Prop LTs prop RTs Peds Bikes Buses 0 %Inprotphase Duration 0.25 I Westbound I L T R 1 119 168 75 12 2 2 10.90 0.90 0.90 15 47 21 I I 0 11900 1900 I / 111 0 I L TR 112.0 12.0 1 0 121 270 I 11.000 0.000 I 0.307 I 10 10 0 I Area Type: All 1 1 L TR 12.0 12.0 o 81 330 1. 000 O. 000 0.152 10 o 10 1 L /12.0 I 142 I 11. 000 O. 000 I 0 . 000 1. 000 I 10 10 10 0 0 I 0.0 0.0 other areas o 10 Northbound L T R 38 252 58 2 2 2 0.90 0.90 0.90 11 70 16 o 1900 1900 1900 1 1 T R 12.0 12.0 o 280 64 OPERATING PARAMETERS / southbound I L T R I 185 264 61 /2 2 2 10.90 0.90 0.90 124 73 17 I I 0 11900 1900 1900 I I I 111 I L T R 112.0 12.0 12.0 I 0 194 293 68 I 11. 000 O. 000 I 0 . 000 1. 000 1 10 10 10 0 0 I 0.0 I Eastbound I westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I 1 I Init Unmet 10.0 0.0 /0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Arriv. Typel3 3 13 3 13 4 3 13 4 3 uni tExt. 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 I Factor I 1.000 I 1.000 1 1.000 I 1.000 Lost Time 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Ext of g 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 ped Min g I 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 PHASE DATA phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 page 2 I I EB Left A I Thru A Right A Peds x I WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds x I NB Right 5B Right I Green 32.0 yellow 3.2 I All Red 2.7 I I I I I I I I I I I I untitled NB Left A A A Thru A A Right A A Peds x 5B Left A A Thru A Right A Peds X EB Right WB Right 10.0 8.0 30.0 3.0 3.0 3.3 2.7 0.0 2.1 cycle Length: 100.0 sees Page 3 I I I Page 1 of5 ARTPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis Description/File Information AP _SUN-UNION-Existih9-IDate Prepared Ben.xml IARTPLAN Ilversion ITSP IIAgenCy IIHIGHLAND AVENUE IIBegin Intersection Study Period IK100 IIPeak Direction User Notes IEXISTING CONDITIONS I Roadway Variables Posted Speed Left Turn Lanes I I I I I 115/1/2004 115.1.1 IIAVID IISUNSET POINT IINorthbound I I IIDistrict IIEnd Intersection I IICITY OF CLEARWATER II UNION STREET Facility Data I U'ban;,edIIAADT 211K 3sllD 211PHF N I 0/0 Turns Excl. one Lanes vesll% Heavy Vehicles IBase Sat Flow Rate ILocal Adj. Factor Adjusted Sat Flow Rate II 113 A...lval Type II 0.09sllsignals/Mile II o.ssllevcle Length 0.92SIIThrough g/C 2711Control Type 1.51 19001 0.9sl 17431 I Multimodal Variables D Paved 4 Shoulder/Bike Lane 2 oolloutside Lane . Width 1001 Pavement . Condition 0.41l1Sidewalk I~ A t t dl Sidewalk/Roadway ~ c ua e . Separation ~ Sidewalk/Roadway ~ Protective Barrier ~ Obstacle to Bus ~ Stop ~ IBus Freq Ie=:] Bus Span Of ~ Service ~ Traffic Variables Control Variables [3 IITYPical1 ITYPiCal1 lfile:/ /C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\j effrey .hebert\Local %20Settings\ Temp \preview .xml 5/1/2004 Automobile Service Volume Tables II I I Segment # 11 (to UNION STREET) I II I Thru Mvmt Flow Rate Segment # 11 (to UNION STREET) Arterial Length 0.5 A Lanes 1 ** 2 ** 3 ** 4 ** * ** Lanes 2 ** 4 ** 6 ** 8 ** * ** Lanes 2 ** 4 ** 6 ** 8 ** * ** I I I I I I I Page 2 of5 Median Type I Nonel Control I Int. Approach I Segment I Delay LOS LOS 18.5211 BII cl Auto Speed 24.9 Auto LOS C I II II II II II II II II " II B II C II D II E Hourly Volume In Peak Direction ** " 660 940 II 980 ** II 1370 1880 " 1960 ** II 2100 2820 II 2940 ** II 2820 3770 II 3920 ** II 660 940 II 980 Hourly Volume In Both Directions ** II 1200 1700 1780 ** II 2490 3420 3560 ** 1/ 3810 5130 5340 ** II 5120 6850 7120 ** II 1200 1700 1780 Annual Average Daily Traffic ** 12600 17900 II 18700 ** 26200 36000 1/ 37500 ** 40100 54000 II 56200 ** 53900 72200 II 74900 ** 12600 17900 II 18700 lfile:/ /e :\Documents%20and%20Settings\j effrey.hebertILocal o/020Settings\ T erop \preview.xml 5/112004 I I I Page 1 of5 ARTPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis Description/File Information IFilename lAP _5UN-UNION-132- IDate Prepared . . Ben.xml . Iprogram IIARTPLAN IIversion IAnalyst IITSP IIAgency IArterial Name IIHIGHLAND AVENUE IIBegin Intersection IStudy Period IIK100 IIpeak Direction luser Notes IIPROPOSED (132-UNITS) TOWNHOMES I I IA,ea Type IClass I Posted Speed 1# Thru Lanes IMedian Type ILeft Turn Lanes Roadway Variables II II II II II II I I I I I 115/1/2004 115.1.1 IIAVID IISUNSET POINT I!Northbound I I II District IIEnd Intersection I IIcm OF CLEARWATER lIUNION STREET Facility Data II uro'""edIIAADT 211K 3sllD 211PHF N I 0/0. Turns Excl. I one Lanes Yesll% Heavy Vehicles II I:::: Sat Flow II ILocal Adj. Factor II Adjusted Sat Flow I Rate II IG M,lvalType 0.09sllsignals/Mile o.ssllCycle Length 0.92SIlThrough g/C 2sllcontrol Type 1.51 19001 0.9sl 17431 I Multimodal Variables D ;~::fder/Bike Lane II 2.0011~~:~de Lane II 1001 Pavement . . . Condition II 0.411lsidewalk I~ II A t t dl Sidewalk/Roadway ~ . . c ua e Separation ~ Sidewalk/Roadway r--;;l Protective Barrier ~ Obstacle to Bus ~ Stop L.:J IBUS Freq 1c:=:::TI Bus ~pan Of ~ Service ~ Control Variables [3 IITYPical1 ITYPiCal1 I file:/ Ie: \Documents%20and%20Settings\j effrey .hebert\Local %20Settings\ Temp \preview .xml Traffic Variables 5/1/2004 I Segment # 1 (to UNION STREET) Segment # 1 (to UNION STREET) Arterial Length Lanes 1 2 3 4 * Lanes 2 4 6 8 * Lanes 2 4 6 8 * I I I I I I I " I I I! Page 2 of5 Automobile Segment Data Cycle ~/C ["A;:;::l["%l # Dlr., LengthllAADTI Hourly r;;;ll Length L:~It.!ye!J~ Lanes. . Vol. L:J. 1001[ill[3~c=JJ1 0.5098511 66601~[31 Automobile LOS Median Type I Nonel Thru Mvmt Flow Rate Int. Approach LOS Segment I LOS cl Auto LOS C I Control I Delay . 18.5311 0.5 Auto Speed 24.9 I '! Automobile Service Volume Tables A II B II C " D 1/ E Hourl~ Volume In Peak Direction 1/ ** ** 660 950 990 ** II ** 1390 1910 1990 ** II ** 2110 2860 2980 ** " ** 2850 3820 3970 ** II ** 660 950 990 Hourl~ Volume In Both Directions 1/ ** ** 1210 " 1720 1800 ** " ** 2520 II 3460 3610 ** \I ** 3840 II 5210 5410 ** 1/ ** 5170 II 6950 7220 ** II ** 1210 II 1720 1800 An~ual Average Daily Traffic ** ** 12700 II 18100 19000 ** ** 26600 II 36500 38000 ** ** 40400 II 54800 57000 ** ** 54400 1/ 73100 76000 ** ** 12700 II 18100 19000 -fiIe:/ /C:\Documents%20and%20Settingslj efIrey.hebertlLocal%20Settings\ T emp\preview .xrnl 5/1/2004