The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2002-11042 - PLT2002-11005 CL WCoverSheet . . FLD2002-11042 161 BRIGHTWATERDR Date Received: 11/26/2002 ISLAND TOWNHOMES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 276A P...",:.,.;... ~/, ;.":' ;'."-.':;'~~ . ':~\. .. 'r"m ~~~ l Od- -: Receipt #: 1200200000000017200 Date: 11/26/2002 11/26/2002 11 :06: 12AM Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Flexible Commercial Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2002-11042 04 010-341262 Line Item Total: 730.00 $730.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING 15594 In Person Payment Total: 730 $730.00 . THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 CL WCoverSheet . . PL T2002-11 005 161 BRIGHTWATERDR Date Received: 11/26/2002 ISLAND TOWNHOMES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 276A ROGERS BEACH DEVELOPMENT 620 Bayway Blvd., Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767 Phone: 727-809-3391 - Fax: 727-449-9256 SEP () \1 2004 September 3, 2004 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Building Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Florida 33756 Fax: 727-562-4576 RE: Swim Spa at Island Townhomes 161 Brightwater Drive Clearwater Beach, FL Dear Mr. Wells, Northside Engineering is submitting a revised site plan that will make provisions for a swim spa that will be 7'6' Wide and 24'in length. The plans will meet all existing Health Department guidelines for specialty pools. Particular attention will be paid to the 1 ' rule at the seawall. We are requesting that the revision be considered a minor amendment since the required correction regarding retention can be substantiated by the engineering department and the Health Department must approve the pool design, which includes the pool and pool deck area. We have secured the services of Ruben Clarkson to engineer the tie back design for the seawall at the pool location. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. . Sincerely{;~ J. '-tliAt c{jte;v/ Mike Whaley j ~ 4-401 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Section 4-401. Purpose and applicability. This division establishes the approval required to commence development of a use in a zoning district which is identified in that district as requiring a Level Two approval. A Level Two approval is granted by the community develop- ment board, based on a recommendation of the community development coordinator. As with Level One approvals, depending on the nature and. character of the use, the application may require a site plan, plat approval, a traffic impact study, and/or a certificate of concurrency capacity, as part of its application for approval. After a Level Two approval is obtained, a building and an occupancy permit are required, as well as any required licenses. Section 4-402. Application. An applicant for a Level Two approval shall submit an application in accordance with the requirements of section 4-202 (A) and (E) to the community development coordinator who shall review the application in accordance with the requirements of section 4-202 (C) and (D). Section 4-403. Staff review, report and rec- ommendation. After the community development coordinator has reviewed the application with the develop- ment review committee in accordance with the provisions of section 4-202 (C) and (D), the coor- dinator shall transmit a written recommendation to the community development board, or the hearing officer, if applicable, with a copy to the applicant, setting forth recommended findings of fact regarding whether the application conforms to the flexibility criteria in the zoning district in which the property is located, proposed conclu- sions of fact and law and recommended conditions concerning the application. Section 4-404. Community development board decision. Upon receipt of the recommendation of the community development coordinator, the commu- nity development board shall review the applica- tion, the recommendation of the community de- velopment coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial Supp. No. 11 public hearing on the application in accordance with the requirements of section 4-206 and grant the approval, grant the approval subject to spec- ified conditions or deny the application for devel- opment approval. The review and public hearing shall be held within 33 working days after deter- mination of sufficiency, unless the time frame is extended by mutual consent of the applicant and the city. The community development board shall render a decision not lat~r than 7Q q~ys after the initial hearing unless the time frame is extended by mutual consent of the applicant and the city. The community development board shall attach such conditions to tqe approval whiCh are neces- sary to ensure compliarice with the applicable general and specific flexibility require:ments set out in Articles 2 and 3 including the provisions of section 3-911 in regard to general standards for approval conditions. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1,6-15-00; Ord. No. 6998-02, ~ 4, 7-18-02; Ord. No. 7106-03, ~ 20, 9-18-03) e Section 4-405. Effect of a Level Two deci- sion. e Approval of a level two approval shall be deemed to authorize only the particular use for which it is issued and shall entitle the recipjent to apply for a building permit or any other approval that may be required by this development code, the city or regional, state or federal agencies. Such approval shall be evidenced by a written development order issued by the community development coor- dinator that confirms the community develop- ment board's decision and shall be effective upon the date of the board meeting when the decision was rendered. (Ord. No. 7106-03, ~ 21, 9-18-03) Section 4-406. Changes to Level Two devel- opment approvals. A. Minor revisions. The community develop- ment coordinator is authorized to allow minor revisions to an approved Level Two approved after receipt of comments from the development review committee. A minor revision is one which: ;p. Does not alter the location of any private , street and/or driveway by more than 20 feet. e CD4:20 ~ ~Q <;ijo @ No DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND OTHER PROCEDURES ~ 4. 5. 9. Section 4-407. Expiration of a Level Two ap- proval. Unless otherwise specified in the approval, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of the date of the Level '!\vo approval, and all required certificates of occu- pancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Permitted time frames do not change with succes- sive owners. An extension of time to initiate a building permit may be granted by the commu- nity development coordinator provided it is for a period not to exceed one year, is for the project Does not change the use unless such change is of a similar or less intensity, as deter- mined by the community development coordinator. Does not increase the density or intensity of the development Does not result in a reduction of setback or previously required landscape area. Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously ap- proved. Does not result in a substantial modifica- tion or the cancellation of any condition placed upon the application as originally approved. Does not add property to the parcel pro- posed for development. Does not increase the height of the build- ings in a manner that will change the overall height of the project, will not alter the scale of the project, does not exceed the maximum height permitted in by the applicable special area plan and zoning district. Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and de- sign of the project. B. Other revisions. Any other adjustments or changes not specified as "minor" shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures for origi- nal approval. " (Ord. No. 7106-03, ~ 22, 9-18-03) Supp. No. 11 CD4:20.1 ~ 4-501 originally approved and provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The community devel- opment coordinator may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly af- fect the project. The community development board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit applica- tion. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The community development board must receive the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original ex- tension approved by the community development coordinator. Good causes may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national econ- omy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. In the event a project is governed by a development agreement, the timeframes estab- lished in the agreement shall supercede these requirements. The community development board may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments which would significantly affect the project. Amend- ments which will require no or minor amend- ments (as provided by section 4-406.A) may be approved. Amendments which will require a ma- jor revision to the subject project shall be required to be approved as part of a new Level '!\vo application. Transfer of development rights are exempt from this provision. (Ord. No. 6526-00, ~ 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 7106-03, ~ 23, 9-18-03) DNISION 5. APPEALS Section 4-501. Authority and purpose. A. The community development board has the authority to hear appeals from: 1. Administrative interpretations of this de- velopment code. .learwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum .rk session Item #: P u..) Y Final Agenda Item # Meeting Date: 7/17/03 SUBJECT/RECOMMENDATION: Approve the final plat for "ISLAND TOWNHOMES" located on Brightwater Drive approximately 900 feet east of the intersection of Harnden Drive and Brightwater Drive, ~ and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. SUMMARY: . This proposed subdivision will replat lots 14-16, Bayside Subdivision NO.2 The applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with 10 Townhomes (attached dwellings). The Community Development Board approved the site plan on 1/21/03. A copy of the plat is available for review in the City Clerk's office. CoPt 'f'0 ~ ~ ftftrs fC; .fJtt;f1L j{)YV1 ~ I/Jb wss ~ h i10l fJt0 C ~ ME/Y1dS t4~~':nl}t~ t(J/i Sf oJ ~ft/I (/, ~ fU? 1f. CD~j wru-4t f1tft ftotIfl '1/11 Otpv! fLftffbt-1101Jb . . . Reviewed by: Legal N/A Info Srvc N/A Budget N/A Public Works Purchasing N/A DCM/ACM Risk Mgmt N/A Other Planning (;l(. Originating Dept: Public Works Administration (T Mahon ) User Dept. N/A Costs Total Current FY Funding Source: CI OP Attachments /., C>C-/lT!ON {J Other Submitted by: City Manager 13;11 ~ o Printed on recycled paper None Appropriation Code: Plat Island Townhomes.doc . . * z o ~ ~ o t7 e7J ~ ..._ IT I'~ ~) ~~~I ~iI' ... 06/18/03 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING LOCATION MAP ISLAND TOWN HOMES CHaIll IT DWG. .... TtM MIA MIA 1 OF 1 r. . . ~'~~~~ g ~~ ),/ ~~., ~--- ~/II ,r:: '==- ~,'" ':lr1" -==- ~ ~/A~ ~~I ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 28,2003 Mr. Roland Rogers P.O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, FL 34681 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11042/PLT2002-11005 -161 Brightwater Drive Dear Mr. Rogers: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and boatyards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . January 28,2003 Rogers - Page Two 3. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits; 4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 5. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards ofthe Engineering Department be met prior to the issuance of building permits; and 6. That a revised landscape plan, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (January 21,2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on February 4,2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com. ~~/R' Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Planning Director Cc: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlInactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater 161 Island Townhomes - ApprovedlBrightwater 161 Development Order. doc r I I . . ~~~. ~ .~.~)j/~ ~~ ~C":tr - - . g -;C~ ~r::\ ~ f:)~ ~)i ~f ,.~,~ CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 13, 2003 Mr. Roland Rogers P.O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, FL 34681 RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development approval (FLD2002-11042/PLT2002-11005) for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions ofthe side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots. Dear Mr. Rogers: The Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots for property located at 161 Brightwater Drive has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on January 21,2003. The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, WfJA.tN- M. W~ Waym! M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX\Pending caseslReviewed and PendinglBrightwater 161 Island TownhomeslBrightwater 161 BRIAN J. At5N2#rf~Y~-{;OMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BIl.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" J LL . o >- f-- u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: .~ \CL-<\ ~ . ~~~)--~ FAX: . '7 "b '1- 2.-. '1 ~ 2- Phone: S; '"2.-. - 0 -\- ~1 ~ FROM: '\-J \.l--'C'-L ~ ~\\ ~ \ fa \ \ DATE:~ ~~~(t'L Phone:~ 1--~ 04-. RE: \\0\ '\Sr'<~"-\-wt-.k 0,. MESSAGE: ~~\t\.e. ~'\\er ("'\ r- \ t. ~,,~ \ \ A. W"\l~ \\ l NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 ~ , RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 12/09/2002 15:57 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 12/09 15:55 97892982 00:01:37 03 OK STANDARD ECM I I.L . o >- ~ - u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Ho \J~ h C)~~e.t- /']2L~~ \-\vS ,\ ~ . { FAX:~\' - 9>0'3 ~ Phone:_+ 4- :\.- ~ ~ (0 7 FROM: \JrT \N.~\\\ DATE:~ JZ- ~ 0 L MESSAGE: Phone: S \i) 1-- ~ + :)0+ - RE: -A-P 2.00-2'- fl 04- 3 . _ _ b 12.- BJ~cJ -~\~ 4. C. ~ \t \-e.. 12~F -\- CD4l:\..t \l\\-u- '~r ~O~O1- -. \ \t)+L ,~, \2>r\1Vl w~ ~ r NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) :\ J RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPOR TIME 12/09/2002 15:53 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 12/09 15:50 94468036 00:02:42 05 OK STANDARD ECM , . . '" CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT December 9,2002 Mr. Roland Rogers P.O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, FL 34681 RE: Applications for (1) Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots (Case Nos. FLD2002-11042 and PLT2002-11005, 161 Brightwater Drive). Dear Mr. Rogers: The Planning staff has reviewed your applications for (1) Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots at 161 Brightwater Drive. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the applications are complete, but with the following changes/submissions necessary: 1. Submit the $600 application fee for Preliminary Plat. 2. Show on the site plan that six-inch concrete curbing is being placed on both sides of the landscaped areas between the driveways, except for necessary breaks for site drainage. 3. Still question the use of willows in the locations shown so close to entry walkways. Tree characteristics would appear to conflict with walkway clearance. 4. Shrubbery is required on both sides of the property (east and west) out to the front property line. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . . December 9,2002 Rogers - Page 2 5. Still question the ability of lawn maintenance personnel and equipment to access the rear yard with the setbacks requested and landscaping on the sides of the property. 6. The Building Height Configuration detail on Sheet C3.1 is different than the Building Elevations, which indicates a flat roof. Revise. 7. Indicate on the building elevations the color of the barrel tile on the roof. 8. Side elevations of proposed building lack detailing proposed on front and rear of building. Suggest banding of windows and other such details to "dress up" otherwise bland or blank side elevations. 9. Note: Future docks may require the installation of a Fire Department connection near the docks. Suggest investigation of such future requirement and potential installation with the site improvements. If desired to be installed with the proposed site improvements, show on site plan. Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by 4:30 p.m. on December 20,2002 (15 copies of all submittals). The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency at 10:45 a.m. on December 12, 2002, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. Sincerely, W ~'rJ.-l"\. U ~ Wayne Nf. Wells, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Debra Harris, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. . . CDB Meeting Date: January 21. 2003 Case Number: FLD2002-11 042/PL T2002-11 005 Agenda Item: D5 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: Brightwater Investment Establishment REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Housh Ghovaee LOCATION: 161 Brightwater Drive REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering Services, Inc. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.47 acres; 20,847 square feet DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 180 feet of width by 113 feet of depth PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Vacant Attached townhome dwellings PLAN CATEGORY: RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification ZONING DISTRICT: T, Tourist District Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11042/PL T2002- 11 005 - Page 1 . . ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Overnight accommodations West: Overnight accommodations East: Attached dwellings South: Water; Single-family dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Multi-family dwellings and overnight accommodation uses dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: The rectangular site is 0.47 acres located on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 800 feet east of Hamden Drive, and is currently vacant. It is located along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design which provides for the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes and timeshares between two and four stories above parking. The proposal includes constructing a 10-unit three-story townhome building. The building will contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. Each unit will be approximately 3,000 square feet in area, including the ground floor garage/storage area. An additional 460 square feet is within lanais. The parking under the building will include two garage spaces per unit.. Unit driveways will be paired in the middle (2 I-foot wide), whereas the end units will have a single-wide driveway (nine feet wide). The design requires that cars back out into the right-of-way to exit the site. The Community Development Code prohibits "back out" parking for any uses other than detached dwellings. The driveway length will permit a vehicle to completely "back out" of the garage, thus eliminating the garage walls as a potential view obstruction of the sidewalk and street. The development will operate as, and have the characteristics of, single- family detached homes, including the individual garages. The site is located on Brightwater Drive, which is a cul-de-sac street approximately 1,600 in length and generally used only by persons with a destination on the street. From a traffic standpoint, this concept of "back out" parking for townhomes may be acceptable on a low volume cul-de-sac street such as this. It should not be considered, however, as a precedent for deviation from the Code provision of restricting "back out" movement into the right-of-way for single-family residential uses only, and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The request is to permit attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement) and reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The reductions in side setback is a function of the unit size and will provide additional landscaping and a more economically, viable project. The reduction in the rear setback for the building is due to the irregular shape of the property. The southwest comer of the building exceeds the minimum setback (21 feet), whereas the southeast comer is at a l8-foot setback. The rear setback reduction is otherwise to provide pedestrian access to the water and future docks. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 042/PL T2002- 11005 - Page 2 . . The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color (taupe) stucco, white barrel tile roof, a number of windows on all elevations and balconies on both the rear of the second and third floors. The trim and detail (banding) color will be white. The building will also be articulated with the second-floor unit entries recessed from the front fayade and accessed from the ground/first floor by individual stairs. On the rear of the building, units will be provided with roof-top decks accessed via spiral staircases for additional outdoor living areas. The landscape plan meets the Code requirements, utilizing a variety of a colorful groundcover (lantana), shrubs (including Indian hawthorn and viburnam) and trees (including washingtonia palms, magnolia, Spanish cherry and crape myrtle). Additional landscaping will be possible on the roof-top decks at the rear of the building. Landscaping between the driveways may not accommodate the amount and/or types of landscaping proposed. The landscape plan should be modified and/or clarified prior to the issuance of building permits. Solid waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The applicant will be selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat prior to the issuance of building permits. No docks are proposed at this time. Future docks over 500 square feet will require Flexible Development Level Two approval through the Community Development Board. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-801.1): STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? DENSITY 30 dwelling units per Vacant 10 dwelling Yes acre (14 units)/40 units overnight accommodation units per acre (18 units) IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.00 0.73 Yes SURFACE RATIO (lSR) Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11042/PLT2002- 11 005 - Page 3 . e B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803): STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 20,847 square 20,847 square Yes (minimum) feet feet LOT WIDTH N/A 180 feet 180 feet Yes (minimum) FRONT N/A Vacant North: 20 feet to Yes SETBACK building REAR N/A Vacant South: 18 feet to Yes SETBACK building; zero feet to boardwalk SIDE N/A Vacant East: 4.5 feet to Yes SETBACK building; six feet to pavement West: 4.8 feet to building; six feet to pavement HEIGHT N/A Vacant 25 feet Yes maximum PARKING Determined by Vacant 20 spaces (two Yes SPACES the Community per dwelling minimum Development unit) Director based on the specific use and! or ITE Manual standards C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803 (B)): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The subject property was developed in the past as overnight accommodations. The existing buildings and other site improvements were demolished in approximately 1985 and the site has remained vacant since that time. The proposal includes the development of the site with attached dwellings. The applicant desires to develop in an emerging, residential neighborhood with direct access to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf. The subject site is identified in "Beach by Design" as a future residential neighborhood. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11042/PLT2002- 11005 - Page 4 I I I I . . The applicant will provide mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with Beach by Design. A minimum of 10 townhomes of the size proposed is needed to make this project financially feasible. The applicant desires a building residential in character. The requested setback reductions and "back out" parking make the site more marketable and usable resulting in a building consistent with Beach by Design. All surrounding properties along Brightwater Drive currently have "back out" parking into the right-of-way. The majority of those existing parking spaces for the surrounding properties are located within the right-of-way. While the proposed parking for the townhomes will be within the garages, vehicles will be able to park outside the garage without extending into the right- of-way or over the public sidewalk. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The proposed residential townhomes will help stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The current assessed valuation of the site is $522,100. With the redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at $4,800,000. This increase in property value is expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The City of Clearwater generally permits attached dwellings and specifically within the Tourist District. The request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project due to the proposed reduction in setbacks and the proposed "back out" parking. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. Attached dwellings (condos) are located to the east, while overnight accommodation uses dominate the surrounding properties to the north and west. Across the water to the south are single-family dwellings (zoned LMDR). The site is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design which recommends the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and four stories above parking. The proposal is to construct a 10-unit, three-story attached dwelling building. The building will contain two floors of living area above one floor of ground-level parking. The proposal will aid in the revitalization of the Brightwater Drive and Clearwater Beach as a whole. This location provides an opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater that is currently undergoing renewed investment and redevelopment. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11042/PLT2002- 11005 - Page 5 . . The location of the site, in relation to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico, makes it uniquely and ideally suited for the proposed attached dwelling development. The applicant desires to locate a multi-family development with a single-family character along waterfront property within an emerging, residential neighborhood. Properties with these characteristics are limited within the City. The developer is also eager to construct a project consistent with and encouraged by Beach by Design and is constructing a similar project at 200 Brightwater Drive. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally and aesthetically. The Mediterranean architecture and landscape design will set a new standard for the area. It may influence similar redevelopment efforts in the area. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive, redevelopment changes of Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and buildings. The site is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design which recommends the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and four stories above required parking. The City will benefit by having an attractive building located in a redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape enhancements will significantly improve the site. The proposal incorporates well-articulated, unified elevations and coordinated architectural elements. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the construction of an attractive residential development. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design. The site is generally unmarketable and unusable without the requested allowance to permit "back out" parking for attached dwellings and the requested side and rear setback reductions. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-11 042/PL T2002- 11005 - Page 6 . . Adequate parking will be provided on-site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or 15 spaces. The proposal includes two garage spaces per dwelling unit or 20 spaces. D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The area is characterized with modest one and two-story multi-family dwellings and overnight accommodations. This proposal includes luxury, attached dwellings with a future dock as an amenity. It will provide a positive redevelopment example for the area. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Tourist District. The site is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design. Beach By Design includes the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and four stories above required parking. The proposal is consistent and in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties and with Beach by Design. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site is zoned Tourist District and the surrounding area is characterized by overnight accommodation and multi-family dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Tourist District. The proposal is consistent with Beach By Design and will help generate a more appropriate mix of residential uses and encourage the like-redevelopment of other sites. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood, is permitted in the Tourist District and is encouraged Beach By Design. The proposal includes 10 owner-occupied, attached dwelling units with landscaping and parking spaces in excess of Code requirements, with future docks planned. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposal includes developing the site with 10 attached dwellings replacing the former overnight accommodation use demolished in approximately 1985. Vehicle trip generation should decrease over the former use with this proposal, will not have any significant, Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11042/PLT2002- 11005 - Page 7 . . negative impact on affected intersections or roadways and with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on Brightwater Drive. A minimum of 20 feet is provided between the garage door and the proposed public sidewalk within the right-of-way, permitting a vehicle to completely and safely "back out" of the garage. From a traffic standpoint, the concept of "back out" parking may be acceptable on a low volume cul-de-sac such as this. It should not be considered a precedent for deviation from the Code provision of permitting "back out" movement into the right-of-way for single-family detached dwellings only. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards ofthe community character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed landscaping. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposal includes constructing a new building with attractive architecture and well- designed landscaping. An excess of parking will be provided. The level of service on Brightwater Drive will not be degraded. The site will be serviced by black barrels for trash, which will be stored in the garages on non-trash pickup days. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee on December 12, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots for the site at 161 Brightwater Drive, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-11042/PLT2002- 11 005 - Page 8 . . Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits; 3. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits; 4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 5. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards of the Engineering Department be met prior to the issuance of building permits; and 6. That a revised landscape plan, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application I\MS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX\Pending caseslReviewed and PendinglBrightwater 1611s1and TownhomeslBrightwater 161 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-1l 042/PL T2002- 11005 - Page 9 . ~ TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLD2002-11042 161 BRIGHTWATER DR 1/8/2003 . 10:32:09AM Amendment Application 11/26/200~ None WW Received FLDD070 Traffic Eng Review 11 /26/200~ 12/11/200~ None DONE CM 12/11/200~ See conditions. CM FLDD080 Engineering Review 11/26/200~ None HOLD MEL 12/9/2002 1) How are the sidewalks being installed over the retention RLG pond? 2) More than one sanitary sewer service per unit. . 3) Need to use City of Clearwater details for all installation. 4) Fire protection for future docks? 5) Sidewalk is shown as part of new drive aprons. Drive apron should be shown from property line to the back of curb. 6) Minimum sidewalk width is 4 ft. 7) Need to show existing sidewalk on either side to show the transition from existing to proposed. PL12002-11005 COMMENTS: A) None FLDA245 Documents attached in 11/26/200~ None 11/26/200~ PP1an WW FLDA235 Letter To Abutting Prop 11/26/200~ None 11/26/200~ Owner WW FLDA230 Letter of Completeness 11/26/200~ 12/9/2002 None DONE WW 1/2/2003 e WW FLDA244 D.O. Mailed Out 11/26/200~ None 11/26/200~ WW FLDAO 18 Tree Survey Recd 1l/26/200~ 12/5/2002 HwO DONE RA 12/5/2002 RA FLDA130 Map Created 1l/26/200~ 12/30/200~ None DONE ww 1/2/2003 WW Page 1 of4 CaseActivity..rpt ~ TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLD2002-11042 161 BRIGHTWA TER DR 1/8/2003 10:32:09AM FLDA015 Verify Traffic Impact 11/26/200~ HwO 11/26/200~ Fees WW FLDD060 Legal Review 11/26/200~ None 11/26/200~ WW . FLDD050 Land Resource Review 11/26/200~ 12/5/2002 None DONE RA 12/5/2002 No comment. RA FLDDO 1 0 Stormwater Review 11/26/200~ 12/20/200~ None DONE EES EES 12/20/200~ see conditions EES FLDD020 Fire Review 11/26/200~ 12/26/200~ None DONE J C 12/26/200~ 1. Show aFire Hydrant Assembly with a Fire Department J C Connection within 40 feet of the hydrant on the Site Plan prior to a Development Order. ALSO SEE CONDITIONS. FLDD030 Park & Rec Review 11/26/200~ 12/6/2002 None DONE DWR 12/6/2002 See conditions DWR FLDD040 Solid Waste Review 11/26/200~ 12/6/2002 None DONE TJG 12/6/2002 No comments TJG . FLDA140 Site Visit 11/26/200~ 12/1 0/200~ None DONE WW 1/2/2003 WW FLDAOlO Application received 11/26/200~ None DONE WW 1/2/2003 WW Page 2 of 4 CaseActivity..rpt ~~ TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLD2002-11042 161 BRIGHTWATER DR 1/8/2003 . 10:32:09AM FLDD014 Landscaping Review 11/26/200= None HOLD FLDD042 Environmental Review 11/26/200= 12/11/200= None DONE Page 3 of 4 MTP 1. Submit the $600 application fee for Preliminary Plat. 2. Show on the site plan that six-inch concrete curbing is being placed on both sides of the landscaped areas between the driveways, except for necessary breaks for site drainage. 3. Still question the use of willows in the locations shown so close to entry walkways. Tree characteristics would appear to conflict with walkway clearance. 4. Shrubbery is required on both sides of the property (east and west) out to the front property line. S. Sti 11 qu estion the abi Ii ty of I awn maintenance personne I . equipment to access the rear yard with the setbacks request and landscaping on the sides of the property. 6. The Building Height Configuration detail on Sheet C3.l is different than the Building Elevations, which indicates a flat roof. Revise. 7. Indicate on the building elevations the color of the barrel tile on the roof. 8. Side elevations of proposed building lack detailing proposed on front and rear ofbuilding. Suggest banding of windows and other such details to "dress up" otherwise bland or blank side elevations. 9. Note: Future docks may require the installation of a Fire Department connection near the docks. Suggest investigation of such future requirement and potential installation with the site improvements. If desired to be installed with the proposed site improvements, show on site plan. 11/26/200= a) Clearly indicate the sidewalk; MTP b) The landscape spaces between the driveways do not rea work - there is not enough room for all the trees shown. lb. areas need to be redone; c) Continue the hedge along the sides all the way to the property line - a lower pant material can be used within the sight visibility triangle; d) Clarify what plant material will be used on the south side of th e site outside the retention area; e) Staff suggests enlisting the aid of a landscape professional to redraw and resubmit the landscape plan. t) Address all of the above prior to CDB review. 12/11/200= NOComment TF TJF CaseActivity..tpt ~ TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLD2002-11042 161 BRIGHTWATER DR 1/8/2003 . 1O:32:09AM FLDD090 Harbor Master Review l1/26/200~ 1/2/2003 None DONE ww 1/2/2003 N/A - Future docks. Not included in this case. WW . . Page 4 of 4 CaseActivity..rpt .Conditions Associated With . Case #: FLD2002-11042 1/8/2003 1O:32:24AM Fire Condition Warn NOT MET 12/5/2002 J_C FIR 1 12/5/2002 J C DRAFT CONDITIONS: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. PNRl Parks & Recs Condition Warn NOT MET PNRl 12/27/2002 DWR Open Space/Recreation impact fees of$55,167.50 are due to the Parks and Recreation Department (10 townhome units) prior to issuance of building permits or final plat, whichever comes first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817. Calculation updated 12/27/02 based on 2002 property values and other information provided to date. Roland Rogers has requested a meeting with the P&R Director to discuss expenditure of fees. STRM Storm Water Condition HwO MET 12/23/2002 EES 1) Draw down calcs for water quality, 24 hr drawdown tirne(before permit) 2) Sub drain details(met) TERl Traffic Eng Condition Warn NOT MET TERl 12/11/2002 C M a)Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O. Page 1 of 1 CaseConditions..rpt 11 . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Richter, Debbie Friday, December 27,20024:23 PM Wells, Wayne RE: FLD2002-11042/PL T2002-11005, 161 Brightwater Drive Revised comment below noted in Permit Plan: "Open Space/Recreation impact fees of $55,167.50 are due to the Parks and Recreation Department (10 townhome units) prior to issuance of building permits or final plat, whichever comes first. Contact Deb Richter 727-562- 4817. Calculation updated 12/27/02 based on 2002 property values and other information provided to date. Roland Rogers has requested a meeting with the P&R Director to discuss expenditure of fees." -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 20,20022:44 PM To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone, Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie Subject: FLD2002-11042/PL T2002-1100S, 161 Brightwater Drive Revised plans are in. A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm. 216. Please come by and take a look at the re-submission. Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan as appropriate and let me know via email. Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21/03 CDB meeting. Thanks, Wayne 10:45 p.m. Case: FLD2002-11042 and PLT2002-11005 - 161 Brightwater Drive Owner/Applicant: Brightwater Investment Establishment. Representative: House Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Location: 0.47 acres located on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately x feet west ofx. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots. Proposed Use: A 10-unit attached dwelling project. Presenter: W ayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Bill Morris Applicant/Representative: Jeffrey Izzo, Deborah Harris, Roland Rogers The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Plannin!!:: a) b) c) Submit the $600 application fee for Preliminary Plat. Show on the site plan that six-inch concrete curbing is being placed on both sides of the landscaped areas between the driveways, except for necessary breaks for site drainage. Question the use of willows in the locations shown so close to entry walkways. Tree characteristics would appear to conflict with walkway clearance. Shrubbery is required on both sides of the property (east and west) out to the front property line. How will lawn maintenance personnel and equipment to access the rear yard with the setbacks requested 1 d) e) 2. and landscaping o. sides of the property. . The Building Height Configuration detail on Sheet C3.1 is different than the Building Elevations, which indicates a flat roof. Revise. Indicate on the building elevations the color of the barrel tile on the roof. Side elevations of proposed building lack detailing proposed on front and rear of building. Suggest banding of windows and other such details to "dress up" otherwise bland or blank side elevations. Note: Future docks may require the installation of a Fire Department connection near the docks. Suggest investigation of such future requirement and potential installation with the site improvements. If desired to be installed with the proposed site improvements, show on site plan - may have to go to CDB if over 500 square feet will be less than 500 square feet Traffic eneineerine: a) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to e.O. Stormwater: a) Draw down cales for water quality - prior to cdb b) Sub drain details - prior to cdb c) Lot grading must convey water into pond, prior to cdb Solid waste: a) Using black barrels. Will be stored in garage Parks and Recreation: a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees are due for this project (10 unit townbomes) prior to issuance of building permits or [mal plat, whichever comes fIrst. Contact Deb Richter 727-562-4817 heard fee could be as high as $60,000 - would like to discuss with Parks and Recreation Director. 6. Landscapine: a) Clearly indicate the sidewalk; shift the sidewalk out to back of curb at five feet in width b) The landscape spaces between the driveways do not really work - there is not enough room for all the trees shown. These areas need to be redone; - willows aren't recommended Continue the hedge along the sides all the way to the property line - a lower plant material can be used within the sight visibility triangle; Clarify what plant material will be used on the south side of the site outside the retention area; sod is propose; need more plants in the rear corners Staff suggests enlisting the aid of a landscape professional to redraw and resubmit the landscape plan. Address all of the above prior to CDB review. f) g) h) i) 3. 4. 5. c) d) e) f) 7. Land resource: a) No comments. 8. Harbor Master: a) No comments until there is more information applicant will submit for January's DRC 9. Fire: a) Show a Fire Hydrant Assembly with a Fire Department Connection within 40 feet of the hydrant on the Site Plan, prior to cdb .there is one in the area, but not sure where it is; within 57 feet will be acceptable since the hydrant is existing b) DRAFT CONDITIONS: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. c) Fire protection for future docks? Should run water line now for later docks 10. Environmental: a) Future docks need to meet code 11. General eneineerine: a) Need to use City of Clearwater details for all installations. b) Sidewalk is shown as part of new drive aprons. Drive apron should be shown from property line to the back of curb. Show drive aprons prominently. c) Need to show existing sidewalk on either side to show the transition from existing to proposed. Parking is on the other sides PLT2002-11005 COMMENTS: a) None NOTES: * 15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on January 21, 2003 * Email commentstoRolandRogersatriroeers16@aoI.com<mailto:riroeers16@aoI.com> 2 .. . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Martens, Cory Friday, December 20, 2002 5:21 PM Wells, Wayne RE: FLD2002-11042/PL T2002-11005, 161 Brightwater Drive Traffic - no change. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 2:44 PM To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Carrier, AI; Colbert, Joseph; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Martens, Cory; Melone, Donald; Parry, Mark; Richter, Debbie Subject: FLD2002-11042/PL 12002-11005, 161 Brightwater Drive Revised plans are in. A copy is on the cabinets behind my desk next to Rm. 216. Please come by and take a look at the re-submission. Your comments from the 12/12/02 DRC are below. Please revise your comments in Permit Plan as appropriate and let me know via email. Please review ASAP. This case is scheduled for the 1/21/03 CDB meeting. Thanks, Wayne 10:45 p.m. Case: FLD2002-11042 and PLT2002-11005 - 161 Brightwater Drive Owner/Applicant: Brightwater Investment Establishment. Representative: House Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Location: 0.47 acres located on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately x feet west ofx. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning: T, Tourist District. Request: Flexible Development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions ofthe rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots. Proposed Use: A 10-unit attached dwelling project. Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Lisa Fierce, Frank Gerlock, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Tom Glenn, Bill Morris Applicant/Representative: Jeffrey Izzo, Deborah Harris, Roland Rogers The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Planninl!: a) b) Submit the $600 application fee for Preliminary Plat. Show on the site plan that six-inch concrete curbing is being placed on both sides of the landscaped areas between the driveways, except for necessary breaks for site drainage. c) Question the use of willows in the locations shown so close to entry walkways. Tree characteristics would appear to conflict with walkway clearance. d) Shrubbery is required on both sides of the property (east and west) out to the front property line. e) How will lawn maintenance personnel and equipment to access the rear yard with the setbacks requested and landscaping on the sides of the property. The Building Height Configuration detail on Sheet C3.1 is different than the Building Elevations, which indicates a flat roof. Revise. g) Indicate on the building elevations the color of the barrel tile on the roof. h) Side elevations of proposed building lack detailing proposed on front and rear of building. Suggest banding of windows and other such details to "dress up" otherwise bland or blank side elevations. Note: Future docks may require the installation of a Fire Department connection near the docks. Suggest investigation of such future requirement and potential installation with the site improvements. If desired to be installed with the proposed site improvements, show on site plan - may have to go to CDB if over 500 f) i) 1 ..) square feet wileess than 500 squarefeet . 2. Traffic en!!:ineerin!!:: a) Transportation Impact Fee to be determined and paid prior to e.O. 3. Stormwater: a) Draw down cales for water quality - prior to cdb b) Sub drain details - prior to cdb c) Lot grading must convey water into pond, prior to cdb 4. Solid waste: a) Using black barrels. Will be stored in garage 5. Parks and Recreation: a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees are due for this project (10 unit townhomes) prior to issuance of building permits or final plat, whichever comes first. Contact Deb Richter 727 -562-4817 heard fee could be as high as $60,000 - would like to discuss with Parks and Recreation Director. 6. 2 .c> Landscaoine:: a) b) . . Clearly indicate the sidewalk; shift the sidewalk out to back of curb at jive feet in width The landscape spaces between the driveways do not really work - there is not enough room for all the trees shown. These areas need to be redone; - willows aren't recommended c) Continue the hedge along the sides all the way to the property line - a lower plant material can be used within the sight visibility triangle; d) Clarify what plant material will be used on the south side of the site outside the retention area; sod is propose; need more plants in the rear corners e) Staff suggests enlisting the aid of a landscape professional to redraw and resubmit the landscape plan. t) Address all of the above prior to CDB review. 7. Land resource: a) No comments. Harbor Master: a) No comments until there is more information applicant will submit for January's DRC 8. 9. Fire: a) Show a Fire Hydrant Assembly with a Fire Department Connection within 40 feet of the hydrant on the Site Plan, prior to cdb .there is one in the area, but not sure where it is; within 57 feet will be acceptable since the hydrant is existing b) DRAFT CONDITIONS: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. c) Fire protection for future docks? Should run water line now for later docks 10. Environmental: a) Future docks need to meet code 11. General ene:ineerine:: a) Need to use City of Clearwater details for all installations. b) Sidewalk is shown as part of new drive aprons. Drive apron should be shown from property line to the back of curb. Show drive aprons prominently. c) Need to show existing sidewalk on either side to show the transition from existing to proposed. Parking is on the other sides PLT2002-11005 COMMENTS: a) None NOTES: * 15 sets of revised plans, application, etc are due to Planning by Friday, December 20th for review by CDB on January 21, 2003 * Email comments to Roland Rogers at riroe:ersl6lalaol.com <mailto:riroe:ersI6lalaol.com> 3 i-lnellas County Property APpr.r Information: 08 29 1504932000 O. Page 2 of5 08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0140 09-Dec-ZOOZ Jil"l Sl"lith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:39:Z9 Uacant Propert9 Use and Sales COl"lparable aalea value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t: Z60.0Z sales frol"l 2000 - 2001: 0 Sale Date DR Book/Page Price (lJual/UnlJ) Vac/Il"lp Plat Inforl"lation lZ/1.991 9.96511. 096 ZI.000 (U) U 1951: Book OZ1 Pgs 03Z-033 8 /1.988 6.81411. Z51 Z65.500 (M) U 0000 : Book pge - 0 11.910 3.Z101 118 11.500 (Q) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 01 0 0 ( ) 2002 Value EXEMP T IONS JU3t/Market: 116.100 HOl"lestead: 0 Dwner3hip 1 .000 Historic : 0 Use 1: .000 Assessed/Cap: 116.100 Tax Exel"lp t 1: .000 Other Exel"lp t : 0 Taxable: 116.100 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0 2002 Tax In forl"lat ion Land In forl"lat ion District: C..... Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 02 Millage: Z3. Z911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: 4.101. 56 1) 60 x 114 30.00 6.906.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Hol"les 4) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 4.101.56 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exel"lptions, Total Land Value: Z01.180 2002 taxes will be : 4.101.56 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. Z LOT 14 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002 Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 08291504932000 O. Page 3 of5 08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0140 09-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 17:39:30 Vacant Extra Features Description Di~ensions Price Units Value ReO Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[t][f]~~ http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbinlcgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&8=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 plnellas County Property APpr.r Information: 08291504932000 O. Page 4 of5 8i4932= If IDI, (\J 8 ~I ~I ~ DR 150 158 HTWATE RIGHTWA DR DR ~iw DR ER BRII WATER DRiVe: ~ ~~ r. ~~~~ 139 ILa 141A r- -I 181 E3gW TER + ~~6ER BRIGHTWt DR DR DR DR DR I J - ...... 130 ~54 ~6sq 162 166 170 17 LI Y~DE 136 BA ~ 'klD,A ~'1;Ej ~5s~ YD~D AYSI YSI SA Y51DE 51 YSI DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR DR 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002 plnellas County Property APpr.r Information: 0829 1504932000 O. Page 5 of5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 ~ Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 0829 1504932000 O. Page 2 of5 08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0150 09-Dee-ZOOZ Jil"l Sl"lith. CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:40:Z1 Uaeant P rope rtlj Use and Sales COl"lparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1. 2002. based on Census Trac: t : Z60.0Z sales frol"l 2000 - 2001: 0 Sale Date DR BOOk/Page Pric:e (Qual/Un!;]) Vac:/Il"lp Plat Inforl"lation lZ/L991 9.965/1. 096 ZI.000 (U) U 1951 : Book OZ1 Pgs 03Z-033 8 /1.988 6.814/1.Z51 Z65.500 (M) u 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1.980 5.043/Z.114 60.000 (0) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /L91Z 3.154/ 614 64.500 (0) U 2002 Value EXEMP T IONS Just/Market: 114.000 HOl"lestead: 0 Ownership 1 . 000 Historic: : 0 Use 1: . 000 Assessed/Cap: 114.000 Tax Exel"lp t 1: .000 Other Exel"lpt: 0 Taxable: 114.000 Agric:uI tural: 0 2002 Tax Inforl"lation Land Inforl"lation District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 02 Millage: Z3. Z911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: 4.05Z.65 1) 60 x 113 30.00 6. 8Z5. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Hol"les 4) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 cap. 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 4.05Z.65 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Wi thout any exel"lptions. Total Land Value: Z04.150 2002 taxes will be : 4.05Z.65 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. Z LOT 15 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002 I>inellas County Property APpr.r Information: 0829 1504932000 O. Page 3 of5 08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0150 09-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith. CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 17:40:Z0 Vacant Extra Features Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[!][!]~g] http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 :Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 0829 1504932000 O. Page 4 of5 ~4932= ~ ~I o ~ DR 134 DR 140 ~ DR ~ DR 150 158 ~HTWATE RIGHTWA DR DR ~~~ DR ER 180 BR 1 GHTWA DR -ER DRIVE ?5 ~~~ ~ DR + r- - ---, L1J~ER DR 136 142 146 BAYSIDE BAYSID AY51 DR DR DR Y~5~ 4~~ 160 YD~ 162 YSI DR 166 170 '(SID AYD~ DR 17Ll '(51 DR 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 'Pinellas County Property APP.rInformation: 0829 1504932000 O. Page 5 of5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 Pinellas County Property Appr.r Information: 0829 1504932000 O. Page 2 of5 08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0160 09-Dec-2002 Jirrl Srrlith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:40:57 Uacant Property Use and Sales COrrlparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : 260.02 sales frorrl 2000 - 2001: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/lrrlp Plat Inforrrlation 12/1. 997 9.965/1. 096 21.000 (U) U 1951 : Book 027 Pgs 032-033 8 /1.988 6.812/ 663 130.000 (Q) U 0000: Book Pgs - 9 /1.987 6.582/1.503 72.000 (U) U 0000: Book Pgs - 9 11. 981 5.253/1.989 85.000 (Q) U 2002 Value EXEMP T IONS Just/Market: 172.000 HOrrlestead: 0 Ownership 1 .000 Historic : 0 Use X: .000 Assessed/Cap: 172.000 Tax Exerrlpt 1: .000 Other Exerrlp t : 0 Taxable: 172.000 Ag r icu 1 tural: 0 2002 Tax Inforrrlation Land Inforrrlation District: C..... Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 02 Mi llage: 23.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: 4.006.07 1) 60 x 112 30.00 6.744.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 . 00 .00 wi thout the Save-Our-Horrles 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 4.006.07 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exerrlptions, Total Land Value: 202.320 2002 taxes will be : 4.006.07 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 2 LOT 16 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 Pinellas County Property APpr.r Information: 08291504932000 O. Page 3 of5 08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0160 09-Dec-ZOOZ Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 11:40:51 Vacant Extra Features Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) . 00 0 0 0 0 5) . 00 0 0 0 0 6) . 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[!][!]~~ http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbinlcgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 .Pinellas County Property App.r Information: 08291504932000 O. Page 4 of5 '049321 L- --.J 34/ ..; J.f ~ R OR .1 -14 W DR 150 158 fQjHiWA TE RIGHTWA OR DR ~~w DR ~ A ER 180 OR BRIGHTWAiER DR DRIVE i~ 13 DR DR TER + r-----, LlJ~~~ER DR i6 142 146 SIDE SA YSID AYSI lR DR DR ~5S~ DR ~5s4 DR ~6S~ DR 162 YSI DR 166 170 YSJD A YSI DR DR 174 YSI DR 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-click?o= 1 &a=1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/9/2002 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 08291504932000 O. Page 5 of5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/912002 .. . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, January 21, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in Commission Chambers, third floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!. Those cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neil!hborinl! property owners. etc. will be placed on a consent al!enda and approved bv a sinl!le vote at the bel!inninl! of the meetinl!. 1. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Decade 80-XIV (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) - flexible development approval to increase the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 149 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions ofSec 2-903.C, and to reduce the buffer width along the north property line from 10 feet to 5 feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: 146 attached condominium dwellings, 8 attached townhome dwellings, 120-s1ip marina [73 public slips and 43 slips reserved for condos] and 7,500 square-foot nonresidential uses [restaurant/ship's store/marina office]) at 900 North Osceola Ave., J.A. Gorra Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3; Sue Barco Sub, Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23; and F. T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10. FLD2002-10036. (TO BE CONTINUED TO DATE UNCERTAIN) 2. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Peter J. Hunt. TRE - flexible development approval to terminate the status of a nonconforming structure to permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot setback is required, under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot rear setback to building) at 849 Harbor Island, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 6D, 7 A, 7C, Lot 44. FLD 2002- 10034 3. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Morton Plant Hospital Association. Inc. - flexible development application to revise a master site plan previously approved by the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Community Development Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development standards as part of the original Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community Development Board): · Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to bui1ding)*; · Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary shop)*; · Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell Cancer Pavilion)*; · Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);* · Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building);* · Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*; · Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*; . Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*; . Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*; · Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet*. (Proposed Use: Changes to an approved Master Plan including improved stormwater facilities, the addition of property enlarging the campus, the replacement and/or enlargement of seven buildings and the addition of three parking garages) at 300 Pinellas St., Sec 21-29-15, M&B's 12.01, 12.02, 12.03, 12.12, 12.15,21.01,21.02 & 21.03; Magnolia Park, Blk 35 Lots 1-9 & Lots 14-22 and E 10 ft ofa 60 ft abandoned RR right-of-way; Magnolia Park, Blk 38, Lots 1-8 inclusive and 1/2 vac street N, Lots 15, 16, 17, 18-22 inclusive; Bluff View, Lots 16-26 & E 31 ft of Lot 27 and less 10ft vac alleyadj on Riess E; Milton Park, Blk 5, Lots 1-6 & N 1/2 vac alley adj on S; Milton Park, Blk 7, Lots 1-7 and vac alley between Lots 2-7 and N 1/2 vac alley adj S of Lot 1; SJ. Reynold's Sub., Lots 1-5 & N 20 ft of Lot 6, Lot 7-9; J.B. Roberts Sub, Lots 1-2 & 1/2 vac alley on E less road. in NW comer SD Lot 1, Lots 3-5 & 7-11 inclusive and vac alley between & pt unnm lot of Poms Park lying S; Poms Park, E 93.68 ft of unnumbered tract S of Pine lias Ave & N 1/2 ofvac St. on S; Petzold Gulf View, Lot 3 & part of Lot 2 & 4; Turners AC Add to Milton Park Blks A&B & 1/2 vac st on N; Heart and Vascular Pavilion, Commercial Condo - Common Elements; Westover, B1k A, Lots 1-22 & vac rds on E & S; Westover, Blk B, Lots 1,2,3 and Lot 7 and W 14 ft of Lot 6 and Lots 8-17 & vac Pinellas St. adj on N and Lot 4 of Barnes, W.N. Sub, Bluff View Court E 18 ft of Lots 1,7,9, 11, 13,15, 17, 19 & 20 W for road, All of Bluff View Court sub including right of ways less 18 ft for Reynolds Avenue right of way and unplatted land adjacent on W, and Westover Blk B, Lots 4-5 and E 39.3 ft of Lot 6. FLD 2002- 10035 4. Beach Motel Manal!ement (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) of a 6-slip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-601; and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling development with a 6-sli, multi- ~ . . use dock) at 620 Bavwav Blvd. (The Moorings I), Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 9 & 10 and riparian rights. FLD 2002-11039/PLT 2002-11003 5. Cotel, Inc. (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 to 2 feet (to pool deck) and a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling development with an existing 6-s1ip, multi-use dock) at 674 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 19 & 20. FLD 2002-11038/PLT 2002-11002 6. Brie:htwater Investment Establishment (Angelika Marocordes) - flexible development approval for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 0 feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 10 lots. (Proposed Use: A 10-unit attached dwelling development) at 161 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2, Lots 14-16 inclusive. FLD 2002-110421PLT 2002-11005 7. Gus DiGiovanni (Bayway Townhomes, LLC) - flexible development approval (1) to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to walkway), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) for a lO-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3- 601; and preliminary plat approval for 11 lots. (Proposed Use: An II-unit attached dwelling project with 10 docks) at 656 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 15-18. FLD 2002-11041/PLT 2002-11004 8. Burnabv Welch Corporation - flexible development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to 9 feet (to stairwell), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 15-unit attached dwelling development with an existing ll-slip dock) at 692 Bavwav Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 21-23. FLD 2002-11043 9. Carlouel Yacht Club - flexible development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250 feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to 6 feet, under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed use: A 10-foot wide by 250-foot long floating dock [adjacent to seawall]) at 1091 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay Replat, Elk 171, Lots 6-11 and part of Lots 4 & 5. FLD 2002-10033 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567. Lisa Fierce Planning Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQillRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. Ad: 01/05/03 . r-tD ~ooJ- - 110 Lf~ p/.,T J 00;) - iIOD.!J ct6 ~ ;.J'OtL..:5!f G/IO Y A r:::E- 00 I Ct/e..v IE. LA N b ::5T. ..57E- 9~ 0 C!.-L1E17 tl--w A- TEel F L 337SS- FL INT IMP FUND TRE c;o FLAMINGO BAY RESORT 184 BRIGHTWATER DR C:LEriR~IIATER FL. ~5:::;), 6)' 2410 TALLARIDA, STENIO TALLARIDA. DENISE 165 DF:':VON DF,~ CL,EAF~hlr:'TER FL, 3 ~) 7' (s )r 2: ~4 ~~; S~ VAN ZANTEN, KOENRAAD VAN ZANTEN, RENEE D 1.57 DeVON OF:',' CL.Er'F~I,""'(.~TEF~ F'L 2S:3 'll~:' '7 MARTIN, JAMES A JR 1.,15 D[VON DF~ CU:JIR(t.IA TEF~ FL :3371~S7. ~2(~l~39 LA FIESTA BRIGHTWATER c;o HOWELL, HOWARD 701 SPOTTIS WOODE LN C L, E r,~, F~ 1/..1 r, T E r~ FL. :5 ~s ~? .5 (:) t"lriRKS, t'1r:'F~KS , DF~ DE STEFANO, ROBERT W DE STEFANO, DONNA L 125 BRIGHTWATER DR (::L.E{.~lr~~II{iTER F'l_ ?;;.; ~l (;t 7' 2 !.j. () :2 KOEGLER. WALTER A I<(OEr.:iLEF~, :rEplN (:, (',20 r~lF~DEN L,i"J, PI TTSBURGH P(, 1524~) J.132 BRAUKMAN ENTERPRISES INC 5505 CRESSAGE CT r~AI_EIGH t,.J,C 27613 i';;UL,()CI'1. STr::\NL,E\' I<(UL,()CH" (~,NN{" 150 BRIGHTWATER DR CL[(:'F~I/II()TER FL, ::~;:3767 21j.01 q f:~I' C.' 1..1 T I/')~' .. [:'1:;' 'r 1,,1 \l E q 1" I~' f:~'" 'r ", 1...1 ~'''II:;::' I.,.) ',." ,~~ I I I..... '1. ....... '. . ..~ I '., ....~ ...... I' 'I ~j ,_ ,", '....~ - -II ',~,.. 7(lL I '~'.I"n/, "~:'VJ' 9 F~~l ...C)/i q() .c,... , .... ".) n; r. '~ir.""" .,.~. ..' _. \/(lDUZ -' ,Ct 1T ^. .,ST GF f~,~t'1r:-'t .J,\I . AN c; IE:. J-( KA H f) l:?tJeo etJ E,5 {3r r Co" U tCcd-t:v ....JJ\. v L's+m ell:! ~ '3 ;z, 7 '/ 41 -J-CUl S '+'C-l-df- 6-e r JIt'lCLV'\. Y (!Le:./l-e it.J/f'rl~e ~ I/- '56N' gcl{ rY'Cu~~ Qvc. Cl-eo..r~) F L 337Co7 STEEVES, MICHAEL B STEEV'E~:;;" {"t"i(~,D~i G 173 DE'VON DR CL[I~lh~I,^I(i'rEF~ F'l_ 3:5 ~;r (:;t 7' :2 t.l3 ~;.) SOBOLESKI, JAMES W FJO HC)X 820 ROSEI"jONT I L. .:;,OO.le h.REC::Oivj COF~P 714 SANDY POINT LN ROUND LAKE PARK IL I,~, () () ~l ~3 GIOTAKIS" CHRIS B TRE C/O HARLAN" BRUCE 2963 GULF TO BAY BLVD STE? CLEriF';~hl{"TEF~ FL 2)::; '7 .::1 '9 t1 Ii R ,.< ~3" I f=< 1,,\1 I".! .] h (~ F,~ f<' ~;;" D r.'i '/.,1 I',,! 0 115 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEf~I:;:',^I{'~, TE::F: Fl_ :~; 25 '7 (, '7 ~.? t~. () :2 h (\ F::< S" I R 1"',1 I i"'J, .J ~"i{.)F<~I<.S., D~~I""I~t.,.! D, I1S BR r GilT, ,Ir:i '. .:F DR CL,E(~IF'" 'IT ::0... L ~5 :5 7 l~:.~ . ~. DE STEFANO, ROBERT W r... ".... ".....r.. ".. r'" ". I'" r ["). - l>.J' I" [ ,) C '::) I~::, ,~. f~ \ t.J ~ . I ,I "'I r.~ '~'. 125 Bf;~I "I'I:T~'I'.lr) . R DF~ .... ...... I .. .... . L.l..Lr"'IR / F' I.?P\ 'L ?:;?;}" l~:;t 7' .2.4 () ~2 ZLJRli~\ISI.<.I" BOGDI~iN ZUR()(I.ISI{ I" ()t'.J,r--!.ri 139 BRIGHTWATER DR C L, [ tl F<~ 1,.11 (), T E f~ F L 3:3 7 (::~ ~7 :2.4 ()~? GRIFFIN, BARRY N JR 14S GRIGHTWATER DR CL.E('F~',,'.lr~ TEF~ FL 33'?(J )' D BRIGHTWATER INV ESTABLISHME ZOLLSTRASSE 9 FL-9490 'v'r~[)I..JZ I.~ I ECHTEi",l:3T G E h~ Iy'; (.) I>.J, Y . . or LE I SUHE C:OF1.P 181 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEA~<v"IATEF<: r:L. REAGAN. MARGO H TRE 307 ORANGEWOOD LN L.r-~lRGO r:'L. ::.; 2) 7' l~~ 7" ~2 (~l- 0 ~2 ::;:5 ~'/ ~1 () .4 () "7 '}' LENART. DIANE TRE 8542 1/2 LAWRENCE CH I CArlO I L. LANGIEWICZ. JANUSZ lANGIEWICZ, JANINA :51 :";;'1' C) r',,1, r= F< I D Ci E~ DR 13('IF:RI t'--,!CiTO,.-! IL ()('-:/(),:;. 2~t .S'S t~) () () .1.. () (:) .::::, '~~) ~5 L(il",J,GI,:/,,\IICZ: " l"i ILLER, '_(1r~R'y" ,J MILLER, BARBARA S 10 E LOCH LLOYD PKWY 1:3 [L. T 0 I'",! l"iO 6<:j,012 BRIGHTWATER TOWNHOMES 163 B{-t'{::::~~IDE OF,: C:lE(~lr<v"IATCF~ FI_ :::s :~5 '7 l~:;' '7 lC CLERC, ROBERT W LC CLERC, lORETTA M 2247 OVERBROOK AVE N L.(ir';:~GO FL :5::3:''' I~:) ':. :~~;; :5 ~'/ '}' () :? () )f '7 FLAMINGO BAY RESORT INC 184 BRIGHTWATER DR ~ 2 CLE(iRI,^'/(4'rEF~ F'l KOCGlER, WALTER A F<'OEGL.FR" JE(iN (i 135 BRIGHTWATER DR CL[:(~F~l/.,I(\TEF~ F'l .~~; :~) 7' l~~} "7 ~2~ l~l ;L f.) 2:.~ ::S '7 (;. -l :<~ f.~:j. () :? SUN N ft..1(::i\/E~S Il",I,C 170 BRIGHTWATER DR CLE(iF~I/.'/(.~TE:H F'L ~'i I~'I F~ S Z (l L. E: F<:" R 0 r"'j ri r..,1, CIUS. MIECZYSlAW 166 BRIGHTWATE:R DR C L. E (i E~ 1,''/ (iT E E',: FL. 3~S'7()'? ~2~l()~L z~~ ~3 7' 6 '/ ::;;: /1. () .:L CIUS, MIECZYSL.riW W C 1 LIS. t1(;~r< 1 (.i 162 BHIGHTWATER DR CL_Ef~r;~ll.J(iTER r~~L_ :25:3767 2401 CIEZCZriK. CHESTER C I EZCZ(~lf<." MI(iF~ I f~ 158 BRIGHTWATER DR C:LE:(iPv.,I(iTEh~ F'L ~5 ::5 '7 e~ "7 ~: .4 () J.. !{UL.()CH, ST Ar-J.L.E:Y f<,ULriCH '" PI t'..J,N{.) 320 ISLAND WAY ~ 607 CL[r-'iHI,I''/f'i'TER FL. TriMBACK. E:DWARD P JH TAMBACK. CAROLE E 144 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEI(iF<~I,I.,I(~TER F'L. ~)~37 (~~ 7 L~l~J~l ?:~ 2:; .,;/ (0~ '7 :2 .4 () 1. OGRODNY. BOLE:SLriW OGRODNY. ZOF 1 f'i 140 BRIGHTWriTER DR CI_F'::(iPI,I.,/(.)TEH r:::L 5257,-:,/ 2/j01 BAUSTERT. DELBERT V BAUSTEPT, MAPY LOU 134 BRIGHTWriTE:R DR C:LE(:)F;~i,I.J()TE,h: FL :3 !; ../ () '7 :? .4 () .1. ZORRILLri. EUGE:NE: lORRILlA. RAFAEL L 130 BRIGHTWriTER OH C:LEPiRv\l(.iTEH FL BRADLEY, ROBEHT L 128 BRIGHTWATER DR CL[(~'tRv.J()TER r:L. 525767 2.:j.().l 3:3;76.7 ~240.1 I~INf:=f<[f~ 1i'-,,!e 124 BRIGHTWATER DR CL[(.lF~/I,'/A TEH FL JERN I G(~'ti"l. G(~lF1.'y' ,J ERN I G (.i j"',.!, t'/j (.i R \' (; 6012 MARINERS WATCH DR T(it'1P(", fL. ~) ?5 ~1 (~ '7 :3 :::; l~~~ ,lEI . . DR SAUNDERS, WILLIAM SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY 333 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33615 33767 2449 SIMON, RICHARD A 1474 S PAIRIE AVE UD CHICAGO IL GERRITlMANN, DIETHARDT GERRITlMANN. GABRIELA V AM HAAG 12C 65812 BAD SODEN GERMANY 60608 2208 MORGAN, GEORGE W 122 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 2501 BARROWS, SCOTT 0 BARROWS, JUDY L 130 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 2501. CONTI. CAMILLO CONTI. LIVIA 136 BAYS IDE DR CLEARWATER FL GREENBERG, MARTIN A 835 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 2501 33767 2501 CAPPELLO, LISA A CAPPELLO. JOSEPH A 146 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 2501 MEARS, ROBERT E SR MEARS. BARRY L PO BOX 2436 CLEARWATER FL 33757 2436 MARTINOS, GEORGI OS D MARTINOS, DOROTHY PO BOX 5940 MILLER PLACE NY 11764 1225 THOMAS. BRIAN THOMAS, NADINE 5450 MANATEE POINT DR NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 FELDMAN, MARVIN J FELDMAN, LINDA 123 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL ROMAGNO. VITO ROMAGNO. ANNA 129 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 2502 33767 2502 ALCALDE. RICHARD 1620 LEEDS CASTLE INDIANA VA lIOLA. THOMAS B l10LA. KATHRYN M 1 CIRCLE DR MONMOUTH BEACH NJ 07750 1152 22182 OSKARSSON. LEIF OSKARSSON, CYNTHIA 141 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL BARNHART. RANDALL E BARNHART. DEBORAH E 143 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 33767 2502 MARKUS, DONALD S MARKUS. MARIE E 441 S ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ELLIS GROVE IL ALVERSON, LOUISE W 444 MILLERSBURG RD PARIS KY 40361 2145 62241 EBBERT. KATHY S 106 WINDWARD POINT HENDERSONVILLE TN CADDICK, JACK W TRE 70 CHERRY RD KINGSTON RI 02881 1702 37075 5108 JONES. C GRETCHEN 181 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL NATHAN. DAVID H NATHAN, R JOAN 175 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 2502 33767 2502 . . NATHAN. DAVID H NATHAN. JOAN 1016 PONCE DE LEON BLVD STE CLEARWATER FL RACKSTEIN. ANDREW 0 RACKSTEIN. PATRICIA K 305 BLUFF VIEW DR BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33756 1069 33770 1306 DI GIOVANNI. AGOSTINO 01 GIOVANNI, MARIANN 163 BAYS IDE DR CLEARWATER FL HORTl. ERICH W 162 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 2502 33767 SHERMAN, RICHARD SHERMAN, JUDY PO BOX 2424 HEATH OH WOODSON, THOMAS WOODSON. JANICE 170 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 43056 0424 33767 2501 MC MULLIN. JOSEPHINE TRUST C/O MC MULLIN, DONALD JR 688 SHORE DR LARGO FL 33771 MILLER. GERALD R 178 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 KIRKPATRICK. ROBERT M KIRKPATRICK, CHRISTINE L 182 BAYS IDE DR CLEARWATER FL GULATI. DUSHYANT K 186 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 2501 33767 2501, DONOVAN. T PATRICK DONOVAN. CAROLYN 200 BAYS IDE DR CLEARWATER FL O'BRIEN. LAWRENCE E O'BRIEN, PATRICIA 95 DIXWELL AVE QUINCY MA 02169 33767 HLEPAS. PETER HLEPAS. TOULA 4859 N AUSTIN AVE CHICAGO IL MERCURIS. CHERYL R 201 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 60630 1,962 33767 2504 BRIGHTWATER ON THE BAY INC 175 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 2411 LENEART. RENEE TRE 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE CHICAGO IL 60656 2925 TRE AVE TRE AVE TRE AVE TRE AVE TRE AVE TRE AVE TRE AVE TRE AVE . . TRE A\lE TRE tl\,l[ TFiE A\,lE PALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN INC CIO WAllO. EUGENIUSl F 110 BRIGHTWATER DR ~ 4 CL.[(lF<~llI'PITER FL, z~ ?; ~l ~:~ ~7 :2 .4 () .1 WAllO. EUGENIUSl F 'lJfllIC) " If~Er'J,(-'i Clo CLEARWATER BCH MOTEL 110 BRIGHTWATER DR ~4 CLEAF~I,i,!t'iTER Fl" 33'7"'-; rJt.Jol "J~ '~;;o' '~';r.~ ....'f ~"'.:o J~i "'"'I "I i"'j() TEL nil i'viOlEL, tt:/l f'" w DR 1} 4 .~:(~ ...x "';r l.' '"7 ....) ...'i I...... " . , Brightwater on the Bay Renee Lenart-van Zanten 171 & 175 Brightwater Dr Clearwater Fl33767 ~- , ." -'".~.\ r;--- II :\' " ~,-..,.. '. i,l- - \' ,__ _ " .'j'---- ,~ ,. r I ....".,,"",. \ _.------.:-.:~.__. II r. 0 ,j \ i: \. ' ---~.. ., January 16, 2003 JAN 2. \ .,_.""",.""..,-1>' Mark T. Parry City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl33756 '-- -, L.----.-N,,- ( 1,r:VELoPt,/i:NT FL.--A.t~~"L \.:; ~> ~--.._- sU~,v'\CES -r- J ", "f- ^R,WA I cR CI~-" ,-' ,~,..., - , ,1 . \_-' I \.~,.... ~ ~\ N.1,r ~,~ ~ce\"~ ~"i'+V" ~ ~ t}a...do1. c:o~ Yj W.\J~ ,jz.. .Jo> Dear Mark Parry, I am writing in opposition of the variance proposed by Brightwater Investment Establishment at 161 Brightwater Dr. The proposal is to reduce the setback from 10ft to 4.8. Our property, located at 171& 175 Brightwater, is the neighboring property to the west of 161 Brightwater Dr. It consists of2 buildings and a parking lot, which borders 161. Although only a parking lot borders their property, we do not wish for it to remain as such. We have an interest to redevelop, perhaps as attached dwellings, in the future and would like to preserve the minimal distance between the potential buildings. Thank you for your consideration. Sinc~ly, Y'[~-tb??~ Renee Lenart-van Zanten C - Owner .. ,. ~'(J~ [~~~ ~t\k 4 . ~\. .~C"':t - ~ - 'oo=:c'" ~'r:: =- ",Ill ~t1" - ~~ ~~~,~~ ~~~}~ CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 28,2003 Mr. Roland Rogers P.O. Box 676 Crystal Beach, FL 34681 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-11 042/PL T2002-11005 - 161 Brightwater Drive Dear Mr. Rogers: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application for attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions ofthe side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to six feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . January 28,2003 Rogers - Page Two 3. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits; 4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 5. That all storm water, water and sewer design standards ofthe Engineering Department be met prior to the issuance of building permits; and 6. That a revised landscape plan, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (January 21,2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on February 4,2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com. ~~~. Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Planning Director Cc: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Inactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater 161 Island Townhomes - ApprovedlBrightwater 161 Development Order. doc . '~ Clearwater -~ o~ Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 CASE #: "LoC 'z..-- Z- DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff inirals): ' ATLAS PAGE #: - ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: 12_F~ ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: , ~ J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $_1205.00_ 475.00pd Balance due $730.00 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRlNT - - A. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A\ APPLICANT NAME: Angelika Marocordes, President, Brightwater Investment Establishment MAILING ADDRESS: 63674 Altanstadt, Germany PHONE NUMBER: 0114960472108 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Brightwater Investment Establishment (Must include ALL owners) " ; r, i ,! II 'L DE' 'l 0 2D02 AGENT NAME: Housh Ghovaee MAILING ADDRESS: 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, Florida 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: 161 Brightwater Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15 and 16 of Bayside Subdivision No.2", Plat Bk 27, pg. 32-33 Brightwater Drive Clearwater Beach. PARCEL NUMBER: 08/29/15/04932/000/0140 - Lot 14, 08/29/15/04932/000/0150- Lot 15, 08/29/15/04932/000/0160- Lot 16 PARCEL SIZE: .47 acres; 20,847 sq ft lot area (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Residential Townhomes , 3 Stories, 10 units, (enclosed individual garages beneath Jiving area). (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): A side selck reduction from 10' to 4.5' to the bUil. on the east and from 10' to 4.8' 'to the building on the west, a side setback reduction from 10' to 6.0' to the driveways on the east and west, a rear setback reduction from 20' to 0' for boardwalk area and 18' to the building and to be allowed to back out into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _X_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) X SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "A" attached. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Exhibit "A" attached. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Exhibit "A" attached. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Exhibit "A" attached. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Exhibit "A" attached. o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Exhibit "A" attached. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Exhibit "A" attached. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit "A" attached. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Exhibit "A" attached. Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit "A" attached. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the Cityof Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit "A" attached. . 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as awhole. See Exhibit "A" attached. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the sharetl parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. See Exhibit "A" attached. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) @ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; @ COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; @ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; @ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY. @ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species,. size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) @ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) @ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshat.ching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 O'x12' clear space); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. <ID SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of dwelling units proposed; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. <ID REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; <ID FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) <ID LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled .and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. @ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); <ID IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); <ID COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. @ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; @ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if pOSSible) as required. PaQe 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) @ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required), @ Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) @ Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in'the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. K. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowiedge that all representations made in this applitation are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS l t'" o S~or!1 . to and subscribed before me this i (; -' day of CV\!I\I\\DQ A.D. 200::l- to me and/or by <to '''~ who is EDna~ ~ reduced --"- as . identification, (-'~"'" \ \, '\ , \ ~\ \'-<-~ () ~,-"..5l,~-;"o~ Notary ~ 4\.__ - --, -, \.j -"'100 ':l.., My commission expires: ,'\U~~-e+- !'jt .;T' v APPROVED EARWATER ~\\\,\\\Illf""1111. ~,~ l'>~~a Ann Hq," ~II~ *" .......'~ ~ ~ . ~ ~. ~ ~ ..::'~<J S'!,~,,\ 15, <'a '%... '%. :- :~ ~ tz, '8>~ :. =*: &.... :*= _ Ie _ - ~5" IICC863281 :~~ ~:;:;.\.. ..~;::- ~~.. ~8onded\l\~~ ..~~ ~ rA..~Fajn'IflS\l~..~<<v~ ~111~8Lic'.ST~~~ ~\,,# 11"I""I1"\\\\~ F:'age 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Please see attached (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this prope~y constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) " 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws ot'the State of Florida, on this day of . personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public My Commission Expires: S:\Planning DepartmentlApplication Formsldeve/opment revlew\r;omprehensive intill application2.doc PaQe 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . Exhibit A Island Townhomes Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A) 1. This site is located within the Small Motel district and is currently vacant The land coverage requested is consistent with surrounding properties and in many cases, less than that of existing structures as this area consists of more intense uses such as older, small, motels with little to no on-site parking. The proposed three (3) story, ten-unit residential townhome structure is consistent with the scale and bulk of adjacent and surrounding residential properties and will be less intense than that of the surrounding existing overnight accommodation uses. The proposal includes totally enclosed on-site parking, accessed by typical shared, (one and two units per driveway), single-family driveways. No boat docks are proposed at this time however, the requested reduction to the rear setback for the proposed boardwalk area will allow access to future docks which will come back at a later date for separate review. 2. The proposed single-family townhome development will not hinder or discourage redevelopment of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the intent of the Beach by Design program for the Small Motel district. With the construction of this upscale Mediterranean style waterfront residential townhome use and tropical landscaping, other surrounding property owners should be encouraged to come closer into compliance with the intent of the Beach by Design program. Additionally, Strategies for Revitalization calls for the conversion of this area to two to four level townhouses and time shares above parking as proposed. 3. The proposed ten-unit, single-family townhome use will create less of an adverse impact to users of the area than the more intense surrounding motel uses as the site will be occupied by long-term residents (homeowners) as opposed to transient tenants. Visibility triangles will be maintained to ensure pedestrian and vehicular safety. A retention area will be constructed at the rear of the site eliminating runoff onto adjacent properties. 4. The minimization of traffic impact being generated from the site is realized by the proposed single-family townhome use. Other permitted uses within the Tourist zoning district such as restaurants, retail sales, marina facilities, etc, could generate much heavier traffic for the immediate area and prove to be an adverse impact in intensity for the Brightwater Drive right-of-way as opposed to the proposed single-family development. 5. The majority ofthe immediate vicinity consists oflow scale motel buildings built in the 60's and 70's with non-uniform signage. The future vision of the Small Motel district is for two to four story townhomes and timeshares over parking. This proposal is a step in the right direction in order to achieve that vision for the immediate vicinity. No freestanding signage is proposed for this site which along with the proposed enclosed parking will reduce visual blight along the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. 1 . . 6. The proposed development will enhance the visual character of the neighborhood, increase surrounding property values and shall not be a negative impact in regards to acoustics and olfactory issues as a more intense commercial use may be. On- site lighting will not adversely impact surrounding properties as all exterior lighting will be limited to individual "coach-type" attached fixtures for each unit. No spillage onto adjacent properties will occur. No pool area is proposed for this site which should lessen any possibility of noise intrusion onto adjacent properties. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. This site is located within the Small Motel district. Currently the site is vacant. The proposal includes development ofthe site with a ten-unit, three-story townhome structure. The applicant is proposing to construct mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with the Beach by Design program. The proposed floor plans consist of individual enclosed garage parking on the first level with two floors of living area above. No pool or dock structures are proposed at this time. Every other driveway will be separated from the adjacent drive by a landscape island. Eight (8) of the proposed units will share four (4) driveways (2 units per driveway), with the remaining two (2) units having individual driveways. Other than two units each sharing one driveway, the driveways will be typical of a single-family use. The actual building will be 18.5 feet away from the front property line. The typical single-family driveway area proposed is the reason for the need to back out into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Due to the proposal being a single-family residential townhome use, the number of vehicles backing into the right-of-way will be minimal. Additionally, the maintenance of visibility triangles on site will ensure safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The requested side setback reductions of 4.5 and 4.8 feet to the building will allow the site to be developed with residential units of adequate width for the upscale style waterfront type living being offered. Side setback reductions of six feet to the driveways is also being requested to allow adequate ingress and egress to individual garages. Similar and more intrusive side setbacks exist within the area so that the proposed side setback will not be inconsistent with the surrounding area. The zero foot rear setback being requested is for the accommodation of a boardwalk area running parallel to the seawall which will connect to individual boardwalks, over the proposed retention area, leading to the ten dwelling units on site. Although boat docks are not proposed at this time along with this site plan, the future intent of the property owner is to provide boat docks as an amenity for the homeowners on site. A separate review of future boat d~cks will be requested at a later date and is not being requested as part of this application. Access to the future boat docks will be needed, therefore we are asking for approval of the boardwalk area at this time. The proposed building itself will be located 18 feet from the rear property line at the most encroaching point due to the irregular angle of the site along the seawall. A minimum often townhomes of the size and caliber proposed is needed to make this project financially viable. 2 . . 2. The proposed residential use will likely enhance property values in the area by providing new, quality, residential construction and significant landscaping on site. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing value is $459,000.00. This proposed townhome development will significantly improve the value of the site to approximately $4,800,000.00. This increase in value and the draw oflong-term residential homeowners into the immediate area will generate additional tax dollars for the City of Clearwater. 3. The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings as proposed. Additionally, the proposed three-story townhome project is consistent with the vision of the Beach by Design progranl for the Small Motel district. 4. The proposed ten-unit single-family residential townhomes are compatible with the surrounding land uses as many of the neighboring motels maintain long lease tenants. Additionally, the infill of the proposed single-family use will allow for less traffic congestion within the area which will be a positive impact for surrounding uses. Also, Strategies for Revitalization call for the conversion of this Small Motel district area to two to four level townhomes and time shares above parking. 5. At this time, properties are not readily available for this type of upscale, single- family, waterfront, townhome development within this immediate desirable area. The location of Brightwater Drive being on the Intracoastal Waterway and in between two residential fingers makes this proposal a compatible development for the area in addition to being consistent with the intent of the Clearwater Beach by Design program. 6. The immediate vicinity of the subject parcel will be upgraded aesthetically not only by the architectural design of the new townhomes but also by the proposed landscaping and single-family residential use. 7. The proposed development will playa role in the continuous positive changes of Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a newly revitalized site and new buildings with long term residents. The proposal will provide on site parking, thereby eliminating any need for related parking within the right-of-way. The . proposed site plan, inclusive of landscaping, will be a significant improvement to the surrounding area. In addition, the bringing in of affluent single-family property owners will trigger the increase of tax dollars for the City and will trigger an increase in revenue for businesses within the surrounding beach and downtown communities. 8. The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the construction of an attractive, residential project on a currently vacant site. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design. The site is generally unm~ketable and unusable without the approval of the setbacks being requested and to back out from residential driveways into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Allowing the backing out of vehicles into the right-of-way from this site will only add to the realization of the typical passersby that this is a single-family use as opposed to overnight accommodations. 9. Adequate, enclosed parking will be provided on site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 parking spaces 3 . . per dwelling unit or fifteen spaces. The proposal includes two spaces per dwelling unit for a total of 20 parking spaces thereby eliminating the need for parking within the right-of-way. This feature alone will help to reduce on street parking which only increases traffic congestion. 10. The design of the proposed townhome building complies with the Tourist District/Beach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking is being provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The proposal is.for a three-story townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of this area to two to four level townhouses and time shares above parking. The proposed architecture is Mediterranean in design and landscaping, tropical, which will be aesthetically pleasing. The proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach from other beach are~$ as it will be helping to bring the immediate area closer into compliance with Code. The residential design of the proposed project will help to create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" and the street level of this project will be pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all required visibility triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-street parking will also lend to an aesthetically pleasing project in lieu of open parking areas and parking within the right-of-way. 4 r . . .. PROJECT NAME: THE ISLAND TOWNHOMES PROJECT NO. : 201 ") POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA: [\ , i Or-... " n "1I'Y12 1 / ~_.~ II ... V~' L BOT. EL.= STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE ft-NGVD SF AC CF 3.00 656 0.0151 0 3.25 830 0.0191 186 3.50 1004 0.0230 415 3.75 1178 0.0270 688 4.00 1352 0.0310 1,004 4.21 1498 0.0344 1,303 4.25 1526 0.0350 1,364 4.50 1700 0.0390 1,767 T.V. EL. = TOP EL. TOTAL QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = 20,847 SF REQUIRED WATER QULlTY DEPTH = 3/4 IN REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 1,303 CF PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = 4.21 FT AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = 1303 CF ~-A. ~ f- L- f'i: .lf7"f.3' . . NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: THE ISLAND TOWNHOMES PROJECT NO.: 201 VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)= 1,303 BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 4.21 POND AREA (SF) = 1,498 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 3.00 POND AREA (SF) = 656 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 2.00 K= 0.09 (FT./MIN.) LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN (FT) = 10 ELEV. TOTAL INCR L (AV) HG FILTER FLOW POND INCR INCR FT HEAD HEAD (FT) AREA (CFM) AREA VOL. TIME 4.21 1,498 1.81 0.30 2.75 0.66 15 0.89 421 474 3.91 1,288 1.51 0.30 2.75 0.55 15 0.74 358 484 3.61 1,077 1.20 0.30 2.75 0.44 15 0.59 294 497 3.30 867 0.90 0.30 2.75 0.33 15 0.44 230 520 3.00 656 TIME = 1,976 MINUTES TIME= 32.9 HOURS ~~,A. ~ FL PE .. 'f7~3' . . NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 25 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: THE ISLAND TOWN HOMES PROJECT NO. 201 RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= 20,847 SF o SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = o SF OF POND AREA @ C = 20,847 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.95 1.00 0.20 0.9 1 0.2 C= 0.20 POST -CONSTRUCTION TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= 20,847 SF 15,198 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C = 1,700 SF OF POND AREA@ C = 3,949 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.95 1 0.2 0.9 1 0.2 C= 0.81 STORAGE CALCULATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION AREA (ACRES) = 0.48 TIME OF CONC. Tc (MIN.)= 10 I @ Tc =10 (IN/HR)(25 YEAR EVENT)= 8.50 Q(out) = Q @ Tc (CFS) = 0.81 POST -CONSTRUCTION TIME I Q(in) INFLOW OUTFLOW STORAGE (MIN.) (IN/HR) (CFS) (CF) (CF) (CF) 10.00 8.50 3.30 1,977 488 1 ,489 15.00 7.30 2.83 2,547 732 1,815 20.00 6.50 2.52 3,024 976 2,047 30.00 5.40 2.09 3,768 1 ,464 2,304 40.00 4.60 1.78 4,280 1,953 2,327 50.00 4.00 1.55 4,652 2,441 2,211 60.00 3.60 1.40 5,024 2,929 2,095 MAX. STORAGE = 2,327 CF WEIR DESIGN TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= H= Q= 4.50 FT 4.21 FT 0.29 FT 0.81 CFS L=Q/3.3'H^1.5 = 1.58 FT WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.75 in. WATER QUALITY = TOTAL POST CON ST. AREA' DEPTH' 1ft112in= 1,303 CF ~~--A.~ F=-L "E II:: 47'131 1--- I ' '~ Clearwater -~ u~ . . Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 CASE #: ''U) 0 z... DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initi s): W W ATLAS PAGE #: 1-1\.1 A ZONING DISTRICT: 1 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: @ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION @ SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans @ SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $_1205.00_ 475.00pd Balance due $730.00 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01) ~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~ A. APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A\ APPLICANT NAME: Angelika Marocordes, President, Brightwater Investment Establishment MAILING ADDRESS: 63674 Altanstadt, Germany PHONE NUMBER: 0114960472108 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Brightwater Investment Establishment (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: Housh Ghovaee MAILING ADDRESS: 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, Florida 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: 161 Brightwater Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 14, 15 and 16 of Bayside Subdivision No.2", Plat Bk 27, pg. 32-33 Brightwater Drive Clearwater Beach. PARCEL NUMBER: 08/29/15/04932/000/0140 - Lot 14, 08/29/15/04932/000/0150- Lot 15, 08/29/15/04932/000/0160- Lot 16 PARCEL SIZE: .47 acres; 20,847 sq ft lot area (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Residential Townhomes , 3 Stories, 10 units, (enclosed individual garages beneath living area). (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . , DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): A side setback reduction from 10' to 4.5' to the building on the east and from 10' to 4.8' to the building on the west, a side setback reduction from 10' to 6.0' to the driveways on the east and west, a rear setback reduction from 20' to 0' for boardwalk area and 18' to the building and to be allowed to back out into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _X_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) j' PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) @ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "A" attached. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Exhibit "A" attached. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Exhibit "A" attached. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Exhibit "A" attached. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Exhibit "A" attached. @ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Exhibit "A" attached. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Exhibit "A" attached. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit "A" attached. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Exhibit "A" attached. Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit "A" attached. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit "A" attached. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit "A" attached. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. See Exhibit "A" attached. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; r!~~ COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ~ J J ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY. TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) GRADING PLAN, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) @j 7 + + I ...L ~~ -f SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses jand specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation an WI Ife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ""7 Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas ~and water lines; C.,J, II parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; =:!:! ~ePiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater ~ ~,~ . . I :-;;, ~ ..L , Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 O'x12' clear space); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. @, SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: L Land area in square feet and acres; ....:L Number of dwelling units proposed; . ~ 1..,ttI Gross floor area devoted to each use; \. \ t.. u. ~ \.. ~ "'- Parking spaces: total number, presented in ta~ular form with The number of required spaces; , Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; 7 Size and species of all landscape material; -:--,. ..J"pfficial records book and page nlimbers of all existing utility easement; ...Q. y. Building and structure heights ;. 'c:.-" ..3L- Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and - Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (a y, x 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees a" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) @ LANDSCAPE PLAN: ..:!....- All existing and proposed structures; ~ Names of abutting streets; J Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; ~ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ _. j Sight visibility triangles; ~.... Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; ~ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; 'I... Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and I common names; ...:i..- Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and . ~ protective measures; .QJ "'..... Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; - Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); 7.. ~ Irrigation notes. QJ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (a y, x 11) (color rendering if possible); J IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); -eo- COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. i BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; Jy REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (a y, x 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater ..' " . . I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) r \~ Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). @ Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) J Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. K. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I tb subscribed before me this ~ day of , A.D. 200 ~ to me and/or by ,,^- -e.......-, who is ~nallY known~ '\.,Q~ Notary pu IC, {\. . . '"\ OC -.l... My commission expires: l \ lJ'-~e+- \ , I <:.T' / v ignature of property owner or representative i APPROVED EARWATER ~",,\1I1l "'''''''1. ~",\ ,..~ta Ann Hi!/." ~111: *' .V ....... fl)J ~ ~ . ~ ~. ~ ~ .{cP t>.~~\ 15'<'a~'" % : :~ ~ ~ ~~ :: =*: 0..... :*= ~"5 ~o ilCC863281 f;!f ~ ~~. 8 .~~ ~~.o ~ onded~ If' .Or:.:> ~ ~ 7-Ao.otFain'lnS~\~\'l.o~<<~~ ~III~/]Lic, 0 ST ~ ~'C. (j",,~ """""1 """, Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Please see attached (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of , personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public My Commission Expires: S:\Planning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlcomprehensive inti/! application2.doc Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . Exhibit A Island Townhomes Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A) 1. This site is located within the Small Motel district and is currently vacant. The land coverage requested is consistent with surrounding properties and in many cases, less than that of existing structures as this area consists of more intense uses such as older, small, motels with little to no on-site parking. The proposed three (3) story, ten-unit residential townhome structure is consistent with the scale and bulk of adjacent and surrounding residential properties and will be less intense than that of the surrounding existing overnight accommodation uses. The proposal includes totally enclosed on-site parking, accessed by typical shared, (one and two units per driveway), single-family driveways. No boat docks are proposed at this time however, the requested reduction to the rear setback for the proposed boardwalk area will allow access to future docks which will come back at a later date for separate review. 2. The proposed single-family townhome development will not hinder or discourage redevelopment of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the intent of the Beach by Design program for the Small Motel district. With the construction of this upscale Mediterranean style waterfront residential townhome use and tropical landscaping, other surrounding property owners should be encouraged to come closer into compliance with the intent of the Beach by Design program. Additionally, Strategies for Revitalization calls for the conversion of this area to two to four level townhouses and time shares above parking as proposed. 3. The proposed ten-unit, single-family townhome use will create less of an adverse impact to users of the area than the more intense surrounding motel uses as the site will be occupied by long-term residents (homeowners) as opposed to transient tenants. Visibility triangles will be maintained to ensure pedestrian and vehicular safety. A retention area will be constructed at the rear ofthe site eliminating runoff onto adjacent properties. 4. The minimization of traffic impact being generated from the site is realized by the proposed single-family townhome use. Other permitted uses within the Tourist zoning district such as restaurants, retail sales, marina facilities, etc, could generate much heavier traffic for the immediate area and prove to be an adverse impact in intensity for the Brightwater Drive right-of-way as opposed to the proposed single-family development. 5. The majority of the immediate vicinity consists oflow scale motel buildings built in the 60's and 70's with non-uniform signage. The future vision of the Small Motel district is for two to four story townhomes and timeshares over parking. This proposal is a step in the right direction in order to achieve that vision for the immediate vicinity. No freestanding signage is proposed for this site which along with the proposed enclosed parking will reduce visual blight along the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. 1 . . 6. The proposed development will enhance the visual character of the neighborhood, increase surrounding property values and shall not be a negative impact in regards to acoustics and olfactory issues as a more intense commercial use may be. On- site lighting will not adversely impact surrounding properties as all exterior lighting will be limited to individual "coach-type" attached fixtures for each unit. No spillage onto adjacent properties will occur. No pool area is proposed for this site which should lessen any possibility of noise intrusion onto adjacent properties. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. This site is located within the Small Motel district. Currently the site is vacant. The proposal includes development of the site with a ten-unit, three-story townhome structure. The applicant is proposing to construct mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with the Beach by Design program. The proposed floor plans consist of individual enclosed garage parking on the first level with two floors of living area above. No pool or dock structures are proposed at this time. Every other driveway will be separated from the adjacent drive by a landscape island. Eight (8) of the proposed units will share four (4) driveways (2 units per driveway), with the remaining two (2) units having individual driveways. Other than two units each sharing one driveway, the driveways will be typical of a single-family use. The actual building will be 18.5 feet away from the front property line. The typical single-family driveway area proposed is the reason for the need to back out into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Due to the proposal being a single-family residential townhome use, the number of vehicles backing into the right-of-way will be minimal. Additionally, the maintenance of visibility triangles on site will ensure safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The requested side setback reductions of 4.5 and 4.8 feet to the building will allow the site to be developed with residential units of adequate width for the upscale style waterfront type living being offered. Side setback reductions of six feet to the driveways is also being requested to allow adequate ingress and egress to individual garages. Similar and more intrusive side setbacks exist within the area so that the proposed side setback will not be inconsistent with the surrounding area. The zero foot rear setback being requested is for the accommodation of a boardwalk area running parallel to the seawall which will connect to individual boardwalks, over the proposed retention area, leading to the ten dwelling units on site. Although boat docks are not proposed at this time along with this site plan, the future intent of the property owner is to provide boat docks as an amenity for the homeowners on site. A separate review of future boat docks will be requested at a later date and is not being requested as part of this application. Access to the future boat docks will be needed, therefore we are asking for approval of the boardwalk area at this time. The proposed building itself will be located 18 feet from the rear property line at the most encroaching point due to the irregular angle of the site along the seawall. A minimum of ten townhomes of the size and caliber proposed is needed to make this project financially viable. 2 . . 2. The proposed residential use will likely enhance property values in the area by providing new, quality, residential construction and significant landscaping on site. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing value is $459,000.00. This proposed townhome development will significantly improve the value of the site to approximately $4,800,000.00. This increase in value and the draw of long-term residential homeowners into the immediate area will generate additional tax dollars for the City of Clearwater. 3. The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings as proposed. Additionally, the proposed three-story townhome project is consistent with the vision of the Beach by Design program for the Small Motel district. 4. The proposed ten-unit single-family residential townhomes are compatible with the surrounding land uses as many of the neighboring motels maintain long lease tenants. Additionally, the infill of the proposed single-family use will allow for less traffic congestion within the area which will be a positive impact for surrounding uses. Also, Strategies for Revitalization call for the conversion of this Small Motel district area to two to four level townhomes and time shares above parking. 5. At this time, properties are not readily available for this type of upscale, single- family, waterfront, townhome development within this immediate desirable area. The location of Brightwater Drive being on the Intracoastal Waterway and in between two residential fingers makes this proposal a compatible development for the area in addition to being consistent with the intent of the Clearwater Beach by Design program. 6. The immediate vicinity of the subject parcel will be upgraded aesthetically not only by the architectural design of the new townhomes but also by the proposed landscaping and single-family residential use. 7. The proposed development will playa role in the continuous positive changes of Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a newly revitalized site and new buildings with long term residents. The proposal will provide on site parking, thereby eliminating any need for related parking within the right-of-way. The proposed site plan, inclusive of landscaping, will be a significant improvement to the surrounding area. In addition, the bringing in of affluent single-family property owners will trigger the increase of tax dollars for the City and will trigger an increase in revenue for businesses within the surrounding beach and downtown communities. 8. The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the construction of an attractive, residential project on a currently vacant site. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design. The site is generally unmarketable and unusable without the approval of the setbacks being requested and to back out from residential driveways into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Allowing the backing out of vehicles into the right-of-way from this site will only add to the realization of the typical passersby that this is a single-family use as opposed to overnight accommodations. 9. Adequate, enclosed parking will be provided on site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 parking spaces 3 . . per dwelling unit or fifteen spaces. The proposal includes two spaces per dwelling unit for a total of 20 parking spaces thereby eliminating the need for parking within the right-of-way. This feature alone will help to reduce on street parking which only increases traffic congestion. 10. The design of the proposed townhome building complies with the Tourist District/Beach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking is being provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The proposal is for a three-story townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of this area to two to four level townhouses and time shares above parking. The proposed architecture is Mediterranean in design and landscaping, tropical, which will be aesthetically pleasing. The proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach from other beach areas as it will be helping to bring the immediate area closer into compliance with Code. The residential design of the proposed project will help to create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" and the street level of this project will be pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all required visibility triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-street parking will also lend to an aesthetically pleasing project in lieu of open parking areas and parking within the right-of-way. 4 ..... . . L.ETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter witl serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (llg_nt Nam.) with NDnllsllI8 Elllle._. SlrvlCIS, Inc. to act as an agent for Brightwater Investment Establishment (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any ~~nd all documents. related to securing permits am:t approvals for the construction on the property generally located 161 Brightwater Dr;vp, r.l~~~J~t~r ~lorid8 (Property Locationj , PINELLAS County, State of FLORIDA (~~ rr.:e ~;:ro:e~~:e{ 0 0 c/ ~ S O#f,.~62rr- ~~&t Io? Address of Property Owner 6 36 ~ y (~~C'd~_.____ City/State/Zip Code ugzll-//)?C'l~ Title O/ICf-9 tE:oCf?-/)/ot Telephone Number Stale of t\ono.c\'-.. nn~)= \ \ C~~~I Iylf;;.+" (~ -:, ~ ~\ ........ 7$ ~ ~ ~ ,":,,\SS\ON ~,~'. ~ .. . ~....' '--fA . ,.. '0 >>'O\\5'<'a ~'. ~ l~ ~~ ~ ~... ~ .::;;'l:" .1r::::. *: ..... :<e= \ ~CC663'l6~ i fg ~ ~~. 'a-.;::- ~0'. 8ondedW.<!> 1>".....,..,.;::- ~ -f-9:....Joy Fain-\rI>"''':..;'''<< <<'#" ~ rp,:.......-<'<:-" ~ ""11. v8L1e Sit>.' ~",'i:. , ""'''''\II\\\\\~ (SEAL ABOVE) I~ tb .:J day The foregoing instrum8ilt was acknowledge before me thi5 F\~(\\~C . ofC>e..\rbe.....-, 20@ by \"'\ \ \-~ ~~ ,as ~ personally known--tome,or who has produced as identification emd Wl10 did (did not) take an oath (~)O--c),,- H~. ~ NalllryP"bl~ ( SiQ113ture) -f Commission # C:-<: tJ ~ '3 ~~ .~ bi"- f\f\\1 \~Nam. of Notary Typod. Ponlad or Stamped) fl f a5I'!d~<:99 qor~\Ildse:: f cO uer 60 !980S9vvL?L ~S30I^~3S ~NI~33NIDN3 30ISH1~ON :A8 +uas ~ . . Per 2..-00L - 1\ o OS"' CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR PLA T APPROVAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME Brightwater Investment Establishment Zollstrasse 9 FL-9490 Vaduz, Liec(Ltenstein ~.6_1 Brightwater Drive see ftbem:: FAX NUMBER : ADDRESS SITE ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER APPLICANT'S NAME Angelika Marocordes, President, Brightwater Investment Establi ADDRESS 63674 Altanstadt, Germany PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER : AGENT NAME How:;h GhOV::lPP, North~;r'lp F.ng;npprjng SpnT;(,p~, Tnc. ADDRESS 601 Cleveland Street, Suite~#930, Clearwater, Fla 33755 (727)443-2869 PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER' 727 446-8036 ~"" ~a Mn Ha. ~III: #'\;),<-'0 ......./~-i- ~ ~ ..~~\SSION l',. ~ I, the undersigned, acknowledge that al.l! .{cS::J ~'O\ 15,<o:~", % representations made in this applicatior! * f ~ ~ .... i? cI>: * ~ are true and accurate to the best of m~ Z> ~ i1CC863281 l i:$ g knowle e\-\ ('1\ 1Ct<,:~~.-~%iied~~~"/~ I by fil~h ~OV I IS ~tt~'L~~I~~ i'llq/t IC, ~,,, \ '''' 1111"'" -.---' . 1111 me or has produced ~~nEcatio~ ~ _.2- L.A. _\ '" J..... ~~'. ~.A.' r-') Notary Public my commission expires: c STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLftS orn to and subscribed before me this -!L Lffay of , !'). ,A.D.,~~to me and/or Ten (10) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; I Page 1 . . ,j - DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT STREETS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY. Page 2 ..... PROJECT NAME NES PROJECT NO. : EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= CN CALCULATIONS TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= CN = C CALCULATIONS TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C= T.O.C. = PROPOSED CONDITIONS TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= CN CALCULATIONS TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= CN = C CALCULATIONS TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C= T.O.C. = . . ISLAND TOWNHOMES 0201 20,847 SF = o SF = o SF = 20,847 SF = 0.48 ACRES 0.00 ACRES 0.00 ACRES 0.48 ACRES 20,847 SF o SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN = o SF OF POND AREA @ CN = 20,847 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN = (LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, TYPE A) 49.00 20,847 SF o SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = o SF OF POND AREA @ C = 20,847 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.20 10 MINUTES 20,847 SF = 15,198 SF = 1,895 SF = 3,754 SF = 0.48 ACRES 0.35 ACRES 0.04 ACRES 0.09 ACRES 20,847 SF 15,198 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN = 1,895 SF OF POND AREA @ CN = 3,754 SF OF PERV. AREA@ CN = (LAWN IN GOOD CONDITION, TYPE A) 87.56 20,847 SF 15,198 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C = 1,895 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 3,754 SF OF PERV. AREA@ C = 0.82 10 MINUTES 98 100 49 0.95 1 0.2 98 100 39 0.95 1 0.2 ~A..-A.~ cr: L pf:'.::Jt lf/Lt3' . . NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 25 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: ISLAND TOWNHOMES JOB NUMBER: 0201 RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= 20,847 SF o SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = o SF OF POND AREA @ C = 20,847 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.95 1 0.2 C= POST -CONSTRUCTION TOTAL AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= 0.20 20,847 SF 15,198 SF OF IMP. AREA @C = 1,895 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 3,754 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.95 1 0.2 C= 0.82 STORAGE CALCULATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION AREA (ACRES) = 0.48 TIME OF CONC. Tc (MIN.)= 10 I @ Tc =10 (IN/HR)(25 YEAR EVENT)= 8.50 Q(out) = Q @ Tc (CFS) = 0.81 POST -CONSTRUCTION TIME I Q(in) INFLOW OUTFLOW STORAGE IMIN.) (IN/HR) ICFS) ICF) ICF) rCF) 10.00 8.50 3.33 2,000 488 1,512 15.00 7.30 2.86 2,577 732 1,844 20.00 6.50 2.55 3,059 976 2,083 30.00 5.40 2.12 3,812 1 ,464 2,348 40.00 4.60 1.80 4,330 1,953 2,377 50.00 4.00 1.57 4,706 2,441 2,266 60.00 3.60 1.41 5,083 2,929 2,154 MAX. STORAGE = 2,377 CF WEIR DESIGN TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= H= Q= 4.50 FT 4.10 FT 0.40 FT 0.81 CFS L=Q/3.3*H^1.5 = 0.97 FT WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.75 in. WATER QUALITY = TOTAL POST CONST. AREA* DEPTH * 1ft112in= 1,303 CF ~~_A.t4~ K- l(e. ~47'131 . PROJECT NAME NES PROJECT NO. : ISLAND TOWNHOMES 0201 STAGE STORAGE DATA: POND 1 : BOT. EL = T.V. EL. = TOP EL = STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE ft-NGVD SF AC CF 3.00 780 0.0179 0 3.25 966 0.0222 218 3.50 1152 0.0264 483 3.75 1338 0.0307 794 4.00 1523 0.0350 1,152 4.10 1598 0.0367 1,308 4.25 1709 0.0392 1,556 4.40 1821 0.0418 1,820 4.50 1895 0.0435 2,006 TOTAL QUALITY CALCULATIONS: TOTAL AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = . 20847 0.75 1,303 4.10 1,308 K9.- A.~ ~ '- ~€ ;t4- '17 \t 31 .. . SERVICES; Page 2 Page 2/3 \ . ~ . 'I .e;, "'fo : 4dfJM- #ANSCONTINENTAL T~ ( 8007892844 -> , ,r-I' .-:- ~C.~ETAIL;8007B92B44; NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING Jan-.16:31; Jen-11-02 1J44?Mi ' Page 213 ~- ~8n~ ay: T~N8CON TPAPLANTj _ ~~ -' .-. 913 223 1797; ,.' .~ ~:,':' --'~".</.< ...;.'.- . '. l1'f:5T I 9...014468 JAJI 16, 1998 12; UP!'! III 01-29-IS-04932 _~I.ao " 111.19.1 ).0493;..MX1-4J50 /I oa-Z9-IS.04t.u.ooo-o I'" . Th~ InllnUrlCll'll" ep..i bY IIId fondrd Ul: SioIrId T. JC...a 1M "cnuasoa t2B 634$2 IIIulau Ci&:nnlmy PAItC~t. p ;.AS c:omrrY ,.LA . OFF. _~ 9965 PG 1096 YI J.IlRANn' DUD This ~NARRANTY DEEP. m8de. the 29Ih daY of Dec;ernber. 987. by 8legrtd 1'. Kratt, as T'-i wtICII8 .ddnIn '- JM' 'VeIl..... 128. e34 .....,. o.nnWty, hefeinafter called GRANTOR to BRIGHTWATER INVESTMENT ESTABtI$iMBifT · heleinefter c:alled GRANTEE. whose addmt Is ZoIlstrnM 9. Fl--9480 VadUZ. Litwhtenstein. of Ten DoI1tn and . dged. h8reby 8ftd oanfil1ftS unto WITNESSenl: That GRANTOR. for and in conalderatian of the s oItl8r good and '1atuab1a consideratiOn. raceiPl whereOf is ll8t8by gnantl. bargIIina. .... 1IIienA.... remises. rule''''' conveys. GRANTEE. 1ft 1ha1 ~rtain land situated In Pinellaa County. F1aride. Lot:; 1.4, 15. and 16 Bnyliide SubdiviliOn Nr.2. according to he map or plat thereof A" lPf".nrflP.d in PIal BwK 1J. PlSle 32 of tne Pu . Records. of Plne11a8 County, Florida. Tagethar with all of the tenemenl.., hereditarrwnts. and appLlrtena ces IhenIID belonging ~ ~ ::-;...'!!:~_ !~~~tlln!frJ To Heve IIftd to Hold. Cha same In fee simPle forever. This car.veyanoe III .0 fWbjflc:t \0 e,arementl. /et1JlctJonl. lim record If 8tI'f new exiat. bUt any .uch interllS1ll ht may halle hereby r.ImpO$8d. IInd II cubject also to apptie8b" Z0rW\9 0 and conditione of tllrminated are not and taxU. GRANTOR heleby covenenta with GRANTEE thll GRANTOR is lawfully tleized of I8Id land In fee strnpJe: 1hat the GAANTOR hila good right .nd auIhorfty to ... and convey thilland: iU1d that tile GRANTOft hWeby fully ':::::rnmtIt the .. to the land *lid will 1 defenCI the same .g1llMt fie ~ cIeIrnS of.n persons ~ ........ ~ ":: , ~ I!1:Ei I ~.,,~ ... -.. J tlQ.. :~ . ~'''jJ3-.~L-:: GIII-. nit ' \m: ., ".~ t l'e ... I' (' ~...I>o" I .. ~J ..- ., ....---.. -. - - 1;;'-.,r/~ - I I ~ ... I:, ~ . I. !. 1 I , I I 4::::. ~:.q..CSI-"M; 8007892644 -> NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES; Page 3 Jan-e2 16:31,' Page 3/3 jY: TRANSCO"NTINENTAL'r.. c o RETAILj8007892B44j .- -/ , 813 223 1797; Jan-1'-02 1 44PMj , Page a/:3 .:Sent By:_ ~ANSCON TPAPLANT; --. -:--'" --:-- ' - Y" ......... In WICneu WheFllOf GRNJTOR hal Signed al'd ~ thne ~ fnt ebove wriften. SigMd, ...... ... delivered In our presence~ x~~ ~__'tt.":Y';..t {a.,a;cL X !J h1L71L/ W1tnc:.s~C)J ,J i CI (;'K 7 I ~ ." FEIN of GAANTEE.: State of florida County 01 Orange I HEREBY CERTIFY. that on this dey. before me, an officer duly aforesaid an~ in the county .t0R!88id to UIke ap:JcngwIedgrMnts. Slegrld T. KJaft. p Truatee... GRANTOR. knoWn 110 me tg be tho t.ein. and who executed. the foreQOin; InsINmeN MIlCS 8(:knowIedged exwc:ua.d the same. in the ... IIppeMCt descriIJed me that sbe WITNESS my hand uj afJicial $881 In the couf11y and atlIle aforesaid Ills 29111 day of December. 1997. Not8ry, p,,* '! , -' ~ P. 2 af2 r"p : 6:..~~;..'. . - "a,.. .. ". ~ . .' ',:, ---~----~ ., "'.," '. - :: - "~~'4:;' ~~...- ,. - ! r,'..