The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2003-09048 ~ Clearwater o~ ~ . OR:GtNAL CASE. rL"~t)3" 0'10t-8 DATE RECEIVED: , ILS 1'03 RECEIVED BY (staff initialst S N ATLAS PAGE #: L... 10 'I ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACE PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUrl:i,; WEST: EAST: Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 6 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ill SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans rI SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ , 1-05 . U'D -~ ~.. "\ :l NOV 0 h LUU3 * NOTE: 14 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION . , Comprehensive Inf"Ill Redevelopment Project (Revised 06/23/2003) 'T , ~. ~ ~ ~ 10' ...,.:.:." \. -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additional sheets as necessary A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Homeless Emergency Project Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 1120 North Betty Lane, Clearwater, FL 33755 E-MAIL ADDRESS: ether1@tampabay.rr.com PHONE NUMBER: (727) 442-9041 CELL NUMBER: (727) 418-9520 FAX NUMBER: (727) 443-4875 PROPERTY OWNER(S): E"Il~bodY'i TibllrR:iI~lllIR~ :ilRd ~gl+llllll~~ El+Illrll11R-;;y I?rQjll~t, IRI; (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME(S): Ms. Barbara Green MAILING ADDRESS: 1120 North Betty Lane, Clearwater, FL 33755 E-MAIL ADDRESS: ether1@tampabay.rr.com PHONE NUMBER: (727) 442-9041 CELL NUMBER: (727) 418-9520 FAX NUMBER: (727) 443-4875 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of subject site 1215 and 1211 North Bettv Lane Pinebrook Subdivision Unit No.2, Block E Lot 15 and 16 as per map or Plan thereof recorded in plat book 23, page 71 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: of public records of Pinellas County, Florida. (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 10/29/15/69048/005/0150 and 10/29/15/69048/005/0160 PARCEL SIZE: .62 Acres. 26.929.96 Square feet (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Residential Shelter (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit "A" (include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, speCific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater P:\Zzz2272\05m\Docs\GovtSvcs\comprehensive infill application Res II 6-23-2003.doc DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVI SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X- (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable document) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit B 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Exhibit B 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Exhibit B 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Exhibit B 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit B 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Exhibit B o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Exhibit C Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater P:\Zzz2272\05m\Docs\GovtSvcs\comprehensive infill application Res II 6-23-2003.doc 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopme project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Exhibit C 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit C 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Exhibit C 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit C 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit C 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit C 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Exhibit C 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit C 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. See Exhibit C Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater P:\Zzz2272\05m\Docs\GovtSvcs\comprehensive infill application Res II 6-23-2003.doc ~ E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL .UIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) . o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 y, X 11) and color rendering if possible o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified amorist'", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater P:\Zzz2272\05m\Docs\GovtSvcs\comprehensive infill application Res II 6-23-2003.doc -' G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible) o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detentionlretention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater P:\Zzz2272\05m\Docs\GovtSvcs\comprehensive infill application Res II 6-23-2003.doc , K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Sea 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) . o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. c;p~ by has as Signature of property owner or representative ,,-. i ,.iI\ ,l)ab1; ~~~. A.A CiaJ. q,:.;# "'Yc% eal/~. ~/re" :;;%;0" ;;eee ~~<~~ Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater P:\Zzz2272\05m\Docs\GovtSvcs\comprehensive infill application Res II 6-23-2003.doc .. M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Homeless Emergency Project Inc. (Names of all property owners) agent 1. That (I am/we are) the ewReFfs) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Ms Barbara Green 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Additional 8 unit residential shelter 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: See Attached Resolutions Ms. Barbara Green as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. Thot ('/we), 'he "o'effiigoed a"thorily, hereby ,ertily that the ro'.,oio....... '::~ pr~ Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS My Commission Expires: S:\Planning DepartmentlApplication Forms\development review\2003 FORMS\comprehensive intill application 6-23-2003.doc .~ .'Z.,. 'CII~. "~,^"" . \~:~ ,~ """'" ., ~iwd'. ~~ Je~I?~-A' ,.~ ~/"es~""'~/o,,~ o.::,,'?-;~;- ~~~'~ Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY OF FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST NOV 2 fi 2003 Proiect Description On September 25, 2003, the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. submitted a Flexible Development Application for an infill project involving a Residential Shelter. · The Applicant is moving forward with the development of construction plans and permits and anticipates construction activities associated with the residential shelter. During the course of preparing the construction plans for the residential shelter project located at 1211 N. Betty Lane (Le. Pinebrook Subdivision Unit No. 2, Block E, Lot 15), an opportunity has arisen for HEP to acquire the parcel immediately to the south of the proposed facility (Le. Pinebrook Subdivision Unit No.2, Block E, Lot 15), HEP is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight units I beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramp), and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redovelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [ which permitted an eight unit/bed residential shelter at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provision of Section 2- 704.B]. (Case No. FLD2003-09048, 1211 -1215 North Betty Lane). P:\Zzz2272105mIDocsIGovtSvcsIRes II application description10-31-Q3.doc . '" . . . EXHIBIT "B" SECTION D., WRITTEN SUBMITTAL, REQUIREMENTS RESPONSES TO SIX (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY REQUIREMENTS D.1. The proposed development of land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. As part of its campus master plan, the HEP is proposing to develop permanent supportive housing for homeless individuals with disabilities in the form of an 8- unit residential shelter development on .272 acres located at 1211 N. Betty Lane. This in conjunction with the existing 8-unit residential shelter at 1215 N. Betty Lane will constitute a .62 acres overall parcel with 16-shelter. Consequently, the proposed development will be in harmony with the surrounding developments and will enhance the visual character and functionality of the immediate neighborhood. The proposed project will be in harmony with the scale, bulk and density of adjacent properties. D.2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Adjacent lands are already developed with HEP facilities and other facilities supporting the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed residential shelter development will enhance the value of surrounding properties and will not discourage appropriate development, redevelopment and use of adjacent land and buildings. Conversely, the proposed development will act as a catalyst to promote additional redevelopment of the immediate neighborhood. The anticipated value of new construction on the property is approximately $470,000.00. D.3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will provide much needed housing opportunities for individuals served by HEP. Conversely, the development will have a positive impact on the health and safety of individuals residing and working in the immediate neighborhood and the City of Clearwater. D.4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Approval of this request will enable HEP to utilize its new driveway as a joint driveway serving the residential shelter development currently under construction on lot 16 and the residential shelter development proposed on lot 15 to the south. This will have a positive impact on traffic by providing a single driveway as opposed to two (2) separate driveways resulting in fewer traffic conflicts along N. Betty Lane and less impervious surface. It will also result in a more aesthetically pleasing and harmonious development thereby, enhancing the neighborhood. , . . . 0.5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The character of the North Greenwood area is well established and the HEP campus which includes this parcel is an integral part of the neighborhood and surrounding community. The community is generally comprised of single family, commercial, institutional and recreational uses with a significant level of pedestrian activity. The proposed residential shelter development is consistent with the community character and will enhance the immediate vicinity, which is currently undergoing significant redevelopment. The HEP campus is on the eastern fringe of the Greenwood Neighborhood redevelopment program. 0.6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed 8-unit residential shelter development will have no adverse acoustic or olfactory impacts on the area. As previously noted, the visual character of the project will have a beneficial impact on the neighborhood by enhancing the redevelopment potential of the North Greenwood neighborhood. P:\Zzz2272\05m\Admin-support\Correspondence\Res II application description1 0-31-03.doc . . EXHIBIT "C" RESPONSES TO TEN COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA NOTE: Each of the following criteria were recently analyzed as part of HEP's earlier application which involved this parcel. Notwithstanding, the following responses are provided: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The Applicant not requesting any deviations from current development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties (including existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements). Both the appearance and fair market value of this and abutting properties will be enhanced by the development of the a-unit residential shelter development. The estimated value of the proposed project is $470,000.00. The proposed development will further enhance the ongoing redevelopment efforts currently underway in the North Greenwood neighborhood. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed residential shelter development is permitted under the current Future Land Use Plan and zoning of the property. Further, the proposed project is consistent with the recent development approvals of the City of Clearwater regarding the HEP master plan. 4. The use or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed residential shelter use is consistent with the recently approved HEP master plan and adjacent uses in the immediate area. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The proposed residential shelter use is consistent with the recently approved HEP master plan. HEP's longstanding relationship with the community is established at this location. , . . . 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Property in the immediate vicinity will be upgraded as a result of the new residential shelter development. It will positively impact the values of nearby properties and enhance the currently ongoing redevelopment activities in the neighborhood. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. HEP and Everybody's Tabernacle perform a vital social service to the neighborhood and community at large by providing assistance to, and an outlet for the area's homeless and less fortunate. The individual parcel, neighborhood, and City of Clearwater as a whole will benefit from the proposed infill development. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. As previously noted, this amendment to the master plan does not result in any deviations from the flexible development standards. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. Parking will be provided on-site. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Not Applicable. P:\Zzz2272\05mlAdmin-support\Correspondence\Res II application description10-31-03.doc 'Nov ~7 03 05:51p .000000000000000000000 o.ooonooooo p. 1 FIRST FLORIDA CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. P.O. Box 1(191 Largo, FL ;)3779-1891 Ph # (727)-1141-4547 Fax: (727)-t142-1528 Job #: NOV 2 0 2003 To: HEP Date: 11/17/03 Attn: 8<arb Green Phone: From: Greg Stock Project: Homeless Project Pages: 1 Fax: 443 4875 .Comments: Dear Barb: The exterior color of the apartment building is Benjamin Moore # He 8:1. t~, j e. The roof shingle is 30 year GAF Timberrline Birchwood Blend. Gj,. "~.~ '" / ~ I <C,~ Please mil if you need more information. Thanks. Greg Receipt #: 1200300000000009766 Date: 09/25/2003 9/25/2003 11:07:25AM Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Flexible Commercial Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2003-09048 04 010-341262 Line Item Total: 1,205.00 $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid - Check HOMELESS EMERG 13360 In Person Payment Total: 1,205.00 $1,205.00 . THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 . . FLD2003-09048 1211 N BETTY LN Date Received: 09/25/2003 HOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJ INC ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 269B :~,. r-~ (\~' ~"- ~ '" l::: D~ ti >~ c,'.,._.....j ,.,. ,,,,1 ,,'" ,,' _,. ' .,' v __ "'_'"~''''''' ..... ~'~"":e.5 PAl D CK.NO~"3(P () ,) DATE ::2-~ l 0 ~ ~ VV SFP 2 5 2003 '"" T ,~' i. " \, .... __.' ~ CL WCoverSheet . . o g ~l_jJ ,~f~ l,r{i'.,::~~.. j 1 C:t \~~.. j-\tPF ill! ,,~,;:~, "'} \ ""~/,i"~1 ~';'""",~ ~t:-\;;'" ~~,:;" /"';;' ,;....",. I ~-_,.,t--~ ~~~"'~,\ j<~1\~~ '5? ';~ "~ ~-(\ - '~l'''(~ ~-;.;-: ~l~ ~.f\\ ._~=-cc_ ..~'l ".~-'------ ,,~.~ ":. . '/A";"'--- I"'" .\ ~ rj/J. '111.,1 ~V,;" ...~,)lTEt\,'... "111" CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW " August 31, 2004 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Grant Application Information - 1211 North Betty Lane Dear Ms. Green: This is in response to your request for zoning confirmation for the above referenced site. 1. Describe the project proposal, including all specific uses of the property, such as, offices, counseling, food bank, shelter, etc. (please print): The approved use is an eiqht-bed (eiqht unit) transitional housinq (residential shelter). 2. Project Address: 1211 North Bettv Lane, Clearwater. FL 3. Legal Description: Lot 15. Block E, Pinebrook Unit 2. as recorded in Plat Book 23, Paqe 71 of the public records of Pinellas County. Florida (Parcel 10 1 0/29/1 5/69047/005/0 1 50). 4. Current Zoning category of above location: C. Commercial District. 5. Is the project considered a Social Service Agency? Yes No X 6. Has the above Agency? Yes site been previously approved for use as a Social Service (If yes, give SE# No X BRIAN j. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER Hovr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BU.LjONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . 7. Is there a current Occupational License available on this property? Yes (If yes, provide a copy of Occupational license with application) No X 8. What is the current Occupational License at this site? None - An Occupational License will be required prior to occupancy. 9. X Zoning is an approved use of property identified in number one. The City's Community Development Board approved a Flexible Development request for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect on December 16, 2003 (Case # FLD2003-09048) to permit the residential shelter for transitional housinq. Zoning can only be approved after the following contingencies are met: Application for a Special Exception must be approved. Variances are required and an application must be approved. List variances necessary: Other: Zoning cannot be approved without application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, as the proposed project is not a permitted use for the site. Offieial: 10. l)L Date: Auqust 31 , 2004 S:\Planning OepartmentlC 0 BIFLEXllnactive or Finished ApplicationslBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C) (CIRP - res. shelter) - ApprovedlGrant Zoning Justification Form for 1211 N. Betty Lane 8.31.04.doc August 27, 2004 . m ~(tH~UW~ 1m lill AUG 3 0 2004 llill DEVee=R~~~Net.VA~~i' iEPT Re: Letter from Zoning Official required for grant funding of proposed construction of Permanent Supportive Housing at 1211 North Betty Lane in Clearwater (please use attached form) . Attention: Clearwater Planning Dept. c/o Wayne Wells Contact: Barbara Green Executive Director Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. (REP) 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 (727) 442-9041 (727) 418-9520 (Mobile) . . (PLACE ON JURISDICTION LETTERHEAD) IS THE ZONING APPROPRIATE FOR MY PROJECT? The property on which you currently operate your facility or on which you are proposing to construct a new social service agency, must have the DrODer zonina. To determine if the zoning category is correct for your current or proposed project, please contact the appropriate Zoning Official for your jurisdiction. Please fill out the following information, have the Zoning Official sign as to approval (with or without conditions) and submit this form with your application. 1. Describe your project proposal, including all specific uses of the property, such as, offices, counseling, food bank, shelter, etc. (please print): 2. Project Address: 3. Legal Description: 4. Current Zoning category of above location: 5. Is your project considered a Social Service Agency? Yes No 6. Has the above site been previously approved for use as a Social Service agency? Yes (If yes, give SEt ) No 7. Is there a current Occupational License available on this property? Yes (If yes, provide a copy of Occupational License with application) No 8. What is the current Occupational License at this site? 9. 0 Zoning is an approved use of property identified in number one above. o Zoning can only be approved after the following contingencies are met: o Application for a Special Exception must be approved. o Variances are required and an application must be approved. List variances necessary: _ o Other: o Zoning cannot be approved without application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, as the proposed project is not a permitted use for the site. 10. Signature of the Zoning Official: Signature: Date: If this form is not provided with your application, or there is no name listed as your contact for Zoning determination, your application may NOT be considered for funding. . . 1. Describe your project proposal, including all specific uses of the property, such as, offices, counseling, food bank, shelter, etc. (please print): This is a proposal made by Homeless Emergency Project (HEP) to construct eight new units of Permanent Supportive Housing for persons with disabilities who are exiting emergency shelter. The project has received funding from HUD, the City of Clearwater and private sources. 2. Project Address: 1211 North Bettv Lane. Clearwater. FL 33755 3. Legal Description: Lot 15 Block of Pinebrook Subdivision. Unit No 2 4. Current Zoning category of above location: _ 5. Is your project considered a Social Service Agency? Yes ~ No 6. Has the above site been previously approved for use as a Social Service agency? Yes x.. (If yes, give SE# ) No 7. Is there a current Occupational License available on this property? Yes (If yes, provide a copy of Occupational License with application) No X 8. What is the current Occupational License at this site? N/A 9. x Zoning is an approved use of property identified in number one above. o Zoning can only be approved after the following contingencies are met: o Application for a Special Exception must be approved. o Variances are required and an application must be approved. List variances necessary: _ o Other: o Zoning cannot be approved without application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, as the proposed project is not a permitted use for the site. 10. Signature of the Zoning Official: Signature: Date: . . CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 September 24, 2003 Ms. Barbara Green Executive Director Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: 1211 North Betty Lane Dear Ms. Green: The Housing Emergency Project, Inc. (HEP) has received approval from the City to construct an eight-unit residential shelter for permanent supportive housing for homeless individuals with disabilities at 1215 North Betty Lane. The Community Development Board (CDB) on June 18, 2002, approved with conditions a Flexible Development application, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, of a multi-property plan for the improvement and expansion of HEP services that included the 1215 North Betty Lane property (Case No. FLD 02-04-09, see attached Development Order). On December 17, 2002, the CDB approved with conditions a revision to this prior approval for the 1215 North Betty Lane property only, relating to setback reductions (Case FLD 02-04-09A, see attached Development Order). It is the Planning Department's understanding that HEP is seeking (and has received conditional approval of) US Department of Housing and Urban Development funding for property acquisition for an eight-unit residential shelter at 1211 North Betty Lane. The property at 1211 North Betty Lane is currently zoned Commercial District and is consistent with its underlying land use designation of CG, Commercial General Category. Attached is a copy of the current Commercial zoning district regulations, as contained within the Community Development Code. Further, it is the Planning Department's understanding that the City Commission has included within the FY03-04 Consolidated Action Plan the recommendation for HEP to receive $200,000 to construct permanent supportive housing for homeless persons with disabilities at 1211 North Betty Lane. The funding will begin on October 1, 2003. HEP's application to the Florida Department of Children and Families for $200,000 in funding to construct permanent supportive housing at this site has been recommended for funding, contingent upon the City's approval of the proj eet. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER Hoi'l HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" e e September 24, 2003 Green - Page 2 HEP will be submitting a Flexible Development application by September 25, 2003, for CDB approval of this eight-unit residential shelter use at 1211 North Betty Lane as an expansion of the "master plan," as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Should a complete and sufficient application be submitted, the application would be on-tract to be scheduled for the December 16,2003, CDB agenda. Based on HEP's prior application and the CDB approval for the property at 1215 North Betty Lane, it appears that this application for 1211 North Betty Lane may be compatible. Should you have additional questions, please contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner (727-562-4504). Zoning designation information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the "Clearwater Parcel and Zoning" link. JU/t4J- Frank Gerlock Development Review Manager S:IPlanning DepartmentlLetterslZoning Lettersl]2]] N Betty Lane (C) 9.24.03.doc ~ e e CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SmITH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (]27) 562-4567 FAX (]27) 562-4576 loNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW June 20, 2002 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 FILE RE: Development Order - Case FLD 92 94 Q9 1120 North Betty Lane (Master address; Request involves 1120 Fairburn Avenue, 1212 North Betty Lane and 1215 North Betty Lane) Dear Ms. Green: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On June 18, 2002, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with the following requests: . Site A (1212 N. BettyLane) - Permit the construction of a retail sales use (thrift store) in the Commercial District with 1) a reduction in the front (east) setback along N. Betty Lane from 25 feet to 24 feet to pavement; 2) a reduction in the front (north) setback along Engman Street from 25 feet to 19 feet to building and from 25 feet to 15 feet to pavement; 3) a reduction in the front (west) setback along Fairburn Avenue from 25 feet to 15 feet to building and pavement; and 4) a reduction in required parking from 56 spaces to 47 spaces; . Site B (1215 N. Betty Lane) - Permit a residential shelter in the Commercial District with 1) a reduction in front (west) setback along N. Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet to stairwell and from 25 feet to 23 feet to building; and 2) a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 10 feet to stairway ramping; and . Site C (1120 Fairburn Avenue) - Permit the expansion of an existing social service agency in the Institutional District with 1) a reduction in the front (west) setback along Fairburn Avenue from 25 feet to 8.64 feet to building and from 25 feet to four feet to pavement; and 2) a reduction in required parking from 11 spaces to 6 spaces for the expanded floor area. Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMilTON, COMMISSIONER * BIlljONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . June 19,2002 Green - Page Two Bases of Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.B and Section 2-1204.A. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That any change in ownership on Site A (retail thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community Development Board (CDB); 2. That the landscape plan for Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the northeast comer of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits for Site C improvements; 3. That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards; 4. That the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings; and 5. That all signage meet Code, including the removaVredesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (June 18, 2003). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you ofthe necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on July 2, 2002. . . June 19,2002 Green - Page Three If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4558. Very truly yours, t4~ Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Planning Director Cc: Mr. Michael Reineke, Wade-Trim Mr. Michael Holmes, City Of Clearwater Housing S:IPlanning Depar/men/IC D B\Flexl/nnac/ive or Finished Applica/ionsIBe/ty N J /20 Homeless Emergency Project - ApprovedlBetty N J J 20 Development Order. doc ~1~~ t~~ ...r:::o::::.. ,....w~ .~ == :;:::;! ~~ -==- ~ ~~}~ . C I T Y 0 F . CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT December 20, 2002 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD 02-04-09A -1215 North Betty Lane Dear Ms. Green: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 17, 2002, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application as a revision toa previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (FLD 02-04-09) for a residential shelter in the Commercial District, with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1.* That any change in ownership on Site A (retail thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community Development Board (CDB); BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER G) BII.LjONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . December 20, 2002 Green - Page Two 2. * That the landscape plan for Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the northeast comer of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits for Site C improvements; 3. * That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards; 4. * That the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City staffprior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings; 5. * That all signage meet Code, including the removaVredesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; and 6. That any change to this site, due to the proposed development ofthe property to the south, be included in any application for that parcel. (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD 02-04-09.) Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (December 17, 2003). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year- of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you ofthe necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on December 31, 2002. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. VeO' truly ~~~ /M~. .. Ojuu.~ Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Planning Director Cc: Mr. Michael Reineke, W ade- Trim IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Inactive or Finished ApplicationslBetty N /2/5 Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. - Approved\Betty N /2/5 Development Order. doc .......- '4 . . .~.~~~+ t~~ipcr~~+0.\ ~ .'~ ;,I,,"CI ~ '; ~c-:t ~ _ ~Tjn . ~\oi !II\_",=-=--. .r--.;.'" "''!-4>:. =- ~~ "'~...d>':o.. - - ~~ "''';yLt'''''- "C"o.."~ ~~$.~~'~~~\ ~~)1TE~tA". ~~o1.~ CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 December 18,2003 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-09048 - 1211-1215 North Betty Lane Dear Ms. Green: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit a residential shelter of eight units/beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight units/beds at 1215 North Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2- 704.B]. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . December 18, 2003 Green - Page Two Conditions of Approval: 1. * That any change in ownership on Site A (retail thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community Development Board (CDB); 2. * That the landscape plan for Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the northeast corner of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits for Site C improvements; 3. * That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards; 4. * That the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings; 5. * That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 6. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the southern building; 7. That each residential shelter building be for a maximum of eight unitslbeds; 8. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building, the site plan be revised to relocate the southern handicap parking space to the west end of the parking row to meet accessibility requirements; 9. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building to ensure compliance with the landscape provisions of the Code for tree types and to resolve conflicts oflandscaping with the proposed southern building and/or parking area; and 10. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located underground. (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (December 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you ofthe necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. " . . December 18, 2003 Green - Page Three In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 1, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myc1earwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Planning Director Cc: Mr. Michael Reineke, Wade-Trim I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D B\FLEX\Pending caseslUp for the next CDBlBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C) (C/RP - res. shelter)\Betty N 121/ - 12/5 Development Order. doc . ~ . LL 0 >- I- - (j FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO:_M..~ ~'i'.t_\.a- FAX: . ~ \ ~ - ca to + - 'S" 9 9 D Phone: t> ,:, - e CO 2.. - !> 1>> ~ l~ FROM: W()..V\~~O\\:~ Phone:~Z.7" S~2-4-)04 DATEL 1k\~1 0\3 RE: F-L\) 2..00">,- 0 'h~8 I 2.. \\ - } 'l.. \ 'S" 1\1 - )?,~ ~ MESSAGE: ~tt 14rQrr ~r '2-~O) CDB. NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ~ . ~ RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 12/15/2003 14:01 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURA TI ON PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 12115 13: 57 98138845990 00:04:15 08 OK STANDARD ECM \ e e o City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, 33756 P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater Florida 33758-4748 >- u Fax To: Ms. Barbara Green From: Wayne Wells 562-4504 Fax: 443-4875 Pages: 8 Phone: 442-9041 Date: 12/12/2003 Re: Staff Recommendation CC: o Urgent IRI For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle . Comments: Attached staff recommendation re: FLD2003-09048 - 1211-1215 North Betty Lane Community Development Board Meeting date: Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 2:00pm .\ eHSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT e TIME 12/12/2003 15:45 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 12/12 15:42 94434875 00:04:11 08 OK STAHDARD ECM . . (p;lr~~ .,.~~~lOF T/(~~ .\:'.::-\ 1)f",""Q"~~7~.... ~~ijj ~..##<.7)';. ~c;:s;(....d,/ . " ~!i\ ':. ~~g-~-~~~ "'~~ ==-~~ "P:~- ~It ~~.A'~ ~- ll'r...'j' ~~Jf.#,,~--(J~'\;!~'\ ....+~~}~.,1.. CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW December 1, 2003 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (FLD2003-09048) Dear Ms. Green: The Flexible Development application (Case No. FLD2003-09048) to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B] for property located at 1211-1215 North Betty Lane has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on December 16, 2003. The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, tJ fJ.-.1 AI- M. tJ~ Waym!M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Michael Reineke, W ade- Trim IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUpfor the next CDBIBetty N 1211 -1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C) (CIRP)IBetty N 1211 - 1215 CDB Letter.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER <!) BIlJ_JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 1- . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUHnING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 loNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW November 17,2003 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Flexible Development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04- 09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B] (Case No. FLD2003-09048, 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane). Dear Ms. Green: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval and, while deemed complete and sufficient for advertising purposes, there are still some changes to the plans and application requiring revision: J /. 2. J3. Revise the legal description on Sheet C2 to include Lot 15. Revise the Site Data on Sheet C2 for the proposed front setback to indicate a 17- foot setback to stairway ramping. Revise Exhibit "A" of the application to indicate the requests as outlined above. Revise the responses to the criteria to address all of the requests. Show required sight triangles (20-foot x 20-foot), measured along the front property line and both sides ofthe driveway. Revise Sheets C2 and Ll for size and location. All utilities (proposed), including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-site. Please note on plans. Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening. Show on site plan. J4. (j) J 6. BRlAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HO'tT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BIl.LJONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . November 17, 2003 Green - Page 2 G) Depict on the site/landscape plan by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area). Provide the square footage of interior landscape area proposed and expressed as a percentage of the proposed vehicular use area. Contact Arden Dittmer (562-2563) for areas that qualify as interior landscaping area. J8. Revise the sidewalk north of the southern building to four feet wide (from 9.61 feet). ]9. Provide on the site plan under Site Data on Sheet C2 the basis for the parking required (one space for each two residents). J10. Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures (didn't find them on the resubmitted landscape plans). @ Provide the proposed colors (paint samples, etc.) of the building exterior. The colored duilding elevation is not descriptive enough to tell. ~l'lans should be changed to reflect the two oaks on either side of the dumpster enclosure being changed out with something that will grow more upright (e.g. Dahoon holly, Upright Bottlebrush, or Pond cypress), so that they won't create a conflict problem with sanitation pick up in the future. (3) The invert of the flume was not revised. Revise to 5.0 (shown as 4.5). .[i4. The sidewalk from the public sidewalk to the proposed structure is not continuous. Show connection to the sidewalk within the right-of-way. J15. Dimension the minimum distance from disturbance to the top of bank of Stevenson Creek. Please provide 15 copies of the revised Exhibit "A" and 15 copies of revised site/landscape plans (not necessarily all sheets) by 4 pm on Thursday. November 20.2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com or you may reach me at wavne.wells@clearwater-fl.com. *Make us your favorite! Sincerely, IJ fV1f\J.- M. kI ~ Wayn/M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Michael Reineke, Wade-Trim (fax only) I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C)IBetty N 1211 -1215 Revisions Letter 1 J.17.03.doc LL . o >- f- - () FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: '6o.r-\a~ ~ t'u~ / M",\C-(. \4.\^e~ FAX: "44~. + tt>7S ~ \3- S 8+- :S-~ '71) Phone: 4 +2- - C]\) + I ~ 13 - ~ B 2-... 8 3 b b FROM: W<A..M~ W-t\\~ Phone:~ \0'2.-- 4 S""o4- f.,[\ DA TE:~ lL LL) '0.3 RE: Fu? ~ 03- o,"~ 12.. \ \ - ILlS ^I. j)~ ~ R-tv~ ~\~i le+te.r 01' .', \NA.J ~ b e ~ :)~ cJ . MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 .. RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 11/17/2003 15:08 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 11/17 15: 07 98138845990 00:01:42 03 OK STANDARD ECM " DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURA TI ON PAGE(S) RESULT MODE RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 11/17 15: 35 94434875 00:01:41 03 OK STANDARD ECM TIME 11/17/2003 15:37 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 . . ORIGINAL Building relationships on a foundation of excellence November 4, 2003 ~:r-n I"f""'D ., II... ,.., , 1, Ii ~~..... , ~~To;,/ .__':: ~ '"J' ~, Nnv U h LUU:) Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 r,,! ~."" , r"', .:e, r,," ''''-.'''-''.~rNT ~ t.; '.':"'. ....';_. c':',,:,,,,,, C'-"'''I C-",,_. f"..- ,> '..:: ,:. '>'",.., Ii I Ji- i\.;U:j....I''\WATER Re: Homeless Emergency Project Dear Mr. Wells: Following are our responses to your comments: Comment 1: No P&R comment since residential shelters are exempt from Recreation impact fees and property is less than 1 acre. Response 1: Noted. Comment 2: Overflow flume for pond (Detail A) weir elevation is shown at EL=4.5. This is lower than the pond bottom and needs to be raised to the DHWL. Response 2: Plans have been revised to correct error. Comment 3: Weir Invert at flume (Detail B) also needs to be raised above DHWL. Response 3: Plans have been revised to correct error. Comment 4: Show on the site plan 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the access point/driveway. Objects inside the visibility triangle must not exceed 30" in height from the ground. Response 4: Please refer to amended Plans for sight triangles. Comment 5: Create handicapped accessible path from building to public sidewalk along N. Betty Lane per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). Response 5: Please refer to Updated Site Plan for Sidewalk. Comment 6: Construct sidewalk on N. Betty Lane along property's frontage. Response 6: Please refer to Site Plan; the existing sidewalk has been hatched for better clarity. Comment 7: Revise the application to include the 1215 N. Betty Lane address, both parcel numbers (Parcel No.1 0/29/15/69048/005/0150 and 10/29/15/69048/005/0160) and both legal descriptions. ."r.1I111111. r~'ll~ .. FL LC Reg. No, C000121 r =,= ] .. ~r.,.~ .. 4919 Memorial Highway. Suite 200 . Tampa, FL 33634 . 813.882.8366 . 888,499,9624 . FAX: 813,884.5990 . www,wadetrim.com ......... Engineering . Landscape Architecture . Planning . Sciences . Surveying . . Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP November 4, 2003 Page 2 Response 7: Please refer to attached application for revision. Comment 8: The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office indicates the present owner of 1211 North Betty Lane to be Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., while the application indicates the owner to be the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Which is correct? If it is Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., then change the application and the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. Response 8: Correct, Everybody's Tabernacle is the current owner, attached please find a contract for sale making Homeless Emergency Project the owner. Comment 9: We are still awaiting the submission of the original survey (signed and sealed - one copy). Response 9: Mr. Wayne Wells was given an original survey during the ORC meeting. Comment 10: Revise the site plan on Sheet C2 for "Site Data" to indicate the entire parcel size of 0.62 acre and that all site data is based on the entire site size of 0.62 acre (26,929.96 square feet). Revise the site data to indicate "existing," "proposed" and "required" for the proposal. Indicate setbacks to building, pavement and to ramping/stairs. Response 10: Please refer to the revised Site Plan for the above references changes. Comment 11: While the survey indicates the existing trees on the south parcel, the site/landscape plan does not indicate the drip lines for these existing trees, nor whether the trees are to be preserved or removed. Response 11 : Please refer to revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan for the above requested changes. Comment 12: Revise the site plan to curb the edge of pavement with six-inch concrete vertical curbing along the east edge of the parking lot. Response 12:Please refer to the revised Site Plan for the above references change. Comment 13: Revise the site plan to connect the sidewalk adjacent to the south side of the parking lot to the handicap ramp on the east side of the building. Response 13:Please refer to updated Site Plan for new sidewalk and stair case configuration. Comment 14: Unclear why the western and eastern stair configuration is different on the southern building from the northern building, yet the buildings are the same (?). Advise/revise. ....,,11IIIII. r~'ll~ .. [ =.=l .. ,.r.,~ .. ..~IIIIIIII. Response 14: Please refer to Site Plan for amended stair configuration. . . Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP November 4, 2003 Page 3 Comment 15: Dimension the distance from the front property line to the edge of pavement (north and south of the driveway). The drawing indicates the edge of pavement at approximately 23 feet from the front property line, which requires the application request a reduction from the 25-foot front setback. Response 15: Please refer to updated application for setback request and Site Plan for updated dimensions. Comment 16: Indicate that existing driveway(s) no longer to be used will be removed and upright curbing installed within the right-of-way. Response 16: Please refer to the Demolition sheet of the attached plans for update. Comment 17: Dimension the width and length of the southern building on Sheet C2. Response 17: Please refer to attached Site Plans for dimension updates. Comment 18: Show required sight triangles (20-foot x 20-foot), measured along the front property line and both sides of the driveway. Response 18: Please refer to attached Site Plans for site triangle update. Comment 19: All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-site. Response 19:AII available utilities were located by the surveyor. Please note that the plans require the contractor to contact Sunshine One Utility Locate prior to construction. Comment 20: Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening. Response 20: Please refer to architectural rendering. Comment 21: Depict on the site/landscape plan by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area). Provide the square footage of interior landscape area proposed and expressed as a percentage of the proposed vehicular use area. Response 21 :The parking area has eight stalls on each side thus not requiring an internal isle for landscaping. Please note that the beginning and end caps of the proposed parking is landscaped. Comment 22: Show on the site plan set the existing/proposed sidewalk within the N. Betty Lane right-of-way. Comment 23: Provide the gross floor area for this site (not building coverage), in terms of square footage and in relation to the square footage of the overall site. .,."IIIIl. r~'l I...... r =.= J ~ ~r.,~ .. .....IlIIII. Response 22: Please refer to Site Plan for sidewalk location. . . Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP November 4, 2003 Page 4 Response 23:Please refer to Site Data table for FAR calculations. Comment 24: Provide the basis for the parking required on the site plan (one space for each two residents). Response 24: Correct parking is based on one space per two residents. Comment 25: Provide the required base flood elevation required for these buildings. Response 25: Please refer to Site Plan; Finished Floor is called out at elevation 11.50. Comment 26: Provide the building height from base flood elevation to the midpoint of the roof. Response 26: Please refer to architectural rendering. Comment 27: Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Response 27:0ne outdoor light in the parking area and porch lights are proposed at this time. Outdoor light, type and location to be determined with the City's assistance at a later time. Comment 28: Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. Response 28: Please refer to updated Landscape Plans attached to this submittal. Comment 29: Provide a copy of the permit inquiry letter or Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) permit submittal (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable. Response 29:Wade-Trim is in the process of obtaining a permit and will forward a copy upon SWFWMD approval. Comment 30: Address any proposed signage (location, area and color). Response 30:There is no signage proposed at this time. Comment 31: Provide the proposed colors (paint samples, etc.) of the building exterior. Response 31: Please refer to attached rendering from Architect. Comment 32: Revise the request to include the reduction of the front setback (to pavement). Revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to include the requested reduction. ....r."IlIIIII. r~"I~' r =.= 1 .. "".,." .. .~_lIIIIII. Response 32: Please note change to the attached revised application. Comment 33: Revise the response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3, as a residential shelter is not a permitted use within the Commercial District. This is the purpose of the request. . . Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP November 4, 2003 Page 5 Response 33: Please refer to the attached updated application package. Comment 34: For presentation to the Community Development Board (COB), please provide rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy of each). Response 34: Noted, please refer to attachments. Comment 35: Revise the survey(s) for Lots 15 & 16 to indicate the Range as Range 15 East, not Range 19 East. Response 35: Noted, surveyor has been advised. Comment 36: Include city dumpster enclosure on detail sheet. Response 36: Please refer to updated Site Plans for detail. Comment 37: The 20" tree at the NE corner and the (2) 22" at the SE corners are exotic Australian pines and should be removed. Show this requirement on the plans prior to building permit. Response 37: Please refer to updated Demo sheet for tree removal. Comment 38: Modify top of bank to be at least 11' away from the 11" Cypress tree. Show this requirement on the plans prior to D.O. Response 38: Noted, please refer to updated Site Plan for requested changes. Comment 39: Provide 28' ft turn radius for both sides of driveway within the right-of-way. If already constructed as part of the 1215 north betty lane permit, disregard this comment. Response 39: Please refer to Site Plan for reconfigured driveway. Comment 40: How many bedrooms will each apartment unit have? Response 40: One bedroom per apartment. Comment 41: Will each apartment unit provide emergency housing for an individual or (1) one single family or will there be (2) two or (3) three unrelated individuals or families occupying separate bedrooms while sharing the same kitchen & bath facilities? Please explain. Response 41 :One individual. Comment 43: 15-foot buffer zone (from the creek-top of bank) is required. .~,."lIIlII. r~'ll~ .. r =. '= J .. ~r.,~ .. ....~. Comment 42: Construction project shall comply with the requirements of the Florida fire prevention code - 2001 edition. Response 42: Noted. Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP November 4, 2003 Page 6 . . Response 43: Noted, the SWFWMD will be on site November 5th to verify wetland line location. Comment 44: Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3- 1202.0. Install hedges on the north and south property lines with a tree every 35' and submit revised plans. Response 44: Please refer to updated Landscape Plan for referenced changes. Comment 45: Landscape Plan does not show the sight triangles as described in Article 3, Division 9, revise the plan to show these triangles at all the street and driveway intersections. Response 45: Please refer to updated Landscape Plan for referenced changes. Comment 46: Per Section 3-1204.0, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Indicate the curbing on plans accordingly. Response 46: Noted. Sincerely, WADE:T~M';;~ /d~ /~ Michael Reineke Project Engineer MR:fs ll.Z 2272.05M P:\Zzz2272\05m\Admin-support\Corresp\Betty Lane DRC Resp.doc Attachments .~~~. r~'~ I...,. r =. '=) .. ..r.l~ .. .~~lIIII. . . . LL 0 >- I- - () FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: (bW'\GN.- <;~ /M:k ~~~k FAX: . t 4- '1 ~ 4- % 7 S- ,I t 13 - ~ f> + . s ~ ~'D Phone: ++ 2--... , ~ 4::..1 / ~ (3 - ~ P> 2- .. ~ L, , FROM: \rJ~ ~ ~l\\~ . \ DATE:~ i91~J03 Phone:-2~2-r+YD+ . MESSAGE: RE:_FL\I ~u 1.- 0 ~'Q tB \1.. \l - ,L\ S "'. D t~ ~ 1=, ~ \ Drt.~ ~~~ NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) +- RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 10/31/2003 15:27 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/31 15:25 94434875 00:02:18 04 OK STANDARD ECM RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 10/31/2003 16:31 t--iAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10131 15: 28 98138845990 00:02:18 04 OK ST At~DARD ECM 1 :00 p.m. . . Case: FLD2003-09048 - 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane Owner/Applicant: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Representative: Ms. Barbara Green (1120 North Betty Lane, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-442- 9041; fax: 727-443-4875). Location: 0.62 acres located on the east side of North Betty Lane, across from Engman Street. Atlas Page: 269B. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight units/beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted an eight unitlbed residential shelter at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B]. Proposed Use: Residential shelter of eight units/beds. Neighborhood Association: None. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson, Rick Albee, and Scott Rice. Applicant/Representative: Mike Holmes, Michael Reineke, and Barbara Green The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No P&R comment since residential shelters are exempt from Recreation impact fees and property is less than 1 acre. 2. Stormwater: a) Overflow flume for pond (Detail A) weir elevation is shown at EL=4.5. This is lower than the pond bottom and needs to be raised to the DHWL. b) Weir Invert at flume (Detail B) also needs to be raised above DHWL. 3. Traffic En!!:ineerin!!:: a) Show on the site plan 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the access point/driveway. Objects inside the visibility triangle must not exceed 30" in height from the ground. b) Create handicapped accessible path from building to public sidewalk along N. Betty Lane per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). c) Construct sidewalk on N. Betty Lane along property's frontage. d) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. e) No TIF owed, credits of$13,999.50 are greater than the calculated TIF of$12,704.00. 4. General En!!:ineerine:: a) No comments. 5. Plannine:: b) Revise the application to include the 1215 N. Betty Lane address, both parcel numbers (Parcel No. 10/29/15/69048/005/0150 and 10/29/15/69048/005/0160) and both legal descriptions. c) Revise the application to provide the property owner's name and change the parcel size to 0.62 acre. d) The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office indicates the present owner of 1211 North Betty Lane to be Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., while the application indicates the owner to be the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Which is correct? If it is Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., then change the application and the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. e) We are still awaiting the submission of the original survey (signed and sealed - one copy). f) Revise the site plan on Sheet C2 for "Site Data" to indicate the entire parcel size of 0.62 acre and that all site data is based on the entire site size of 0.62 acre (26,929.96 square feet). Revise the site data to indicate "existing," "proposed" and "required" for the proposal. Indicate setbacks to building, pavement and to ramping/stairs. g) While the survey indicates the existing trees on the south parcel, the site/landscape plan does not indicate the drip lines for these existing trees, nor whether the trees are to be preserved or removed. Revise. h) Revise the site plan to curb the edge of pavement with six-inch concrete vertical curbing along the east edge of the parking lot. Page 1 of3 .' , . 6. i) Revise t.e plan to connect the sidewalk adjacent to th.th side of the parking lot to the handicap ramp on the east side of the building. j) Unclear why the western and eastern stair configuration is different on the southern building from the northern building, yet the buildings are the same (?). Advise/revise. k) Dimension the distance from the front property line to the edge of pavement (north and south of the driveway). The drawing indicates the edge of pavement at approximately 23 feet from the front property line, which requires the application request a reduction from the 25-foot front setback. 1) Indicate that existing driveway(s) no longer to be used will be removed and upright curbing installed within the right-of-way. m) Dimension the width and length of the southern building on Sheet C2. n) Show required sight triangles (20-foot x 20-foot), measured along the front property line and both sides of the driveway. 0) All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on- site. p) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screemng. q) Depict on the site/landscape plan by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area). Provide the square footage of interior landscape area proposed and expressed as a percentage of the proposed vehicular use area. r) Show on the site plan set the existing/proposed sidewalk within the N. Betty Lane right-of- way. s) Provide the gross floor area for this site (not building coverage), in terms of square footage and in relation to the square footage of the overall site. t) Provide the basis for the parking required on the site plan (one space for each two residents). u) Provide the required base flood elevation required for these buildings. v) Provide the building height from base flood elevation to the midpoint of the roof. w) Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. x) Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. y) Provide a copy of the permit inquiry letter or Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) permit submittal (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable. z) Address any proposed signage (location, area and color). aa) Provide the proposed colors (paint samples, etc.) of the building exterior. bb) Revise the request to include the reduction of the front setback (to pavement). Revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to include the requested reduction. cc) Revise the response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3, as a residential shelter is not a permitted use within the Commercial District. This is the purpose of the request. dd) For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), please provide rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy of each). ee) New comment: Revise the survey(s) for Lots 15 & 16 to indicate the Range as Range 15 East, not Range 19 East. Solid Waste: a) Include city dumpster enclosure on detail sheet. Land Resources: a) The 20" tree at the NE comer and the (2) 22" at the SE comers are exotic Australian pines and should be removed. Show this requirement on the plans prior to building permit. b) Modify top of bank to be at least 11' away from the 11" Cypress tree. Show this requirement on the plans prior to D.O. Fire: a) PROVIDE 28' FT TURN RADIUS FOR BOTH SIDES OF DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. IF ALREADY CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE 1215 NORTH BETTY LANE PERMIT, DISREGARD THIS COMMENT. b) HOW MANY BEDROOMS WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT HAVE? c) WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT PROVIDE EMERGENCY HOUSING FOR AN INDIVIDUAL OR (1) ONE SINGLE FAMILY OR WILL THERE BE (2) TWO OR (3) UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS OR FAMILIES OCCUPYING SEPARATE BEDROOMS WHILE SHARING THE SAME KITCHEN & BATH FACILITIES? PLEASE EXPLAIN. d) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE - 2001 EDITION 7. 8. Page 2 of 3 11. EnVironmene . a) A 15-foot buffer zone (from the creek-top of bank) is required. Community Response: a) No comment. Landscapinl!: a) Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3-1202.D. Install hedges on the north and south property lines with a tree every 35' and submit revised plans. b) Landscape Plan does not show the sight triangles as described in Article 3, Division 9, revise the plan to show these triangles at all the street and driveway intersections. c) Per Section 3-1204.D, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Indicate the curbing on plans accordingly. " , . 9. 10. NOTES: Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon. I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX\Pending cases I up for the next DRCIBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency ProjectlFinal DRC Comments 1O.30.03.doc Page 3 00 LL . o >- f- u FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ~W'"~~ c;,,~ / M~~ ~r--.Q.~ """?- / FAX: A-4-~ - 4'!~ 75' <t> \~.. ~ co4--- s~90 Phone: 4-+ 2-... '7 '0 4:.1 ~ \ ~ - ~ '0 1-... ~ '3 t,te, FROM: \cJ~~ ~te.\\~ Phone:_S~ 2..- +-S-~ . \ DATE:~i-O~\?; RE:_fLv2..003- O~~+~ \ 2.. \ \ - /2..,S N. l)e~ ~ MESSAGE:~n DrlC... ~--...--\--j Aft\-?J:r r-<lv.e.,) b OlLt.. ~ 104;0/ D~ \ '. ~ f'iV'..' o""t"" o~ (t'\) S. ~~ A""L). NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) +- DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 10/24 11: 33 94434875 00:02:16 04 OK STANDARD ECM TIME 10/24/2003 11:36 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATIOt'-l PAGE(S) RESULT MODE RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 10/24 11: 37 98138845990 00:02:17 04 OK STANDARD ECM TIME 10/24/2003 11:39 ~~AME PLAt'-l FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 1:00 p.m. . . Case: FLD2003-09048 - 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane Owner/Applicant: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Representative: Ms. Barbara Green (1120 North Betty Lane, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-442- 9041; fax: 727-443-4875). Location: 0.62 acres located on the east side of North Betty Lane, across from Engman Street. Atlas Page: 269B. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight units/beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted an eight unitlbed residential shelter at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B]. Proposed Use: Residential shelter of eight units/beds. Neighborhood Association: None. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson, Rick Albee and Scott Rice. Applicant/Representative: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No P&R comment since residential shelters are exempt from Recreation impact fees and property is less than 1 acre. 2. Stormwater: a) Overflow flume for pond (Detail A) weir elevation is shown at EL=4.5. This is lower than the pond bottom and needs to be raised to the DHWL. b) Weir Invert at flume (Detail B) also needs to be raised above DHWL. 3. Traffic Ene:ineerine:: a) Show on the site plan 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the access point/driveway. Objects inside the visibility triangle must not exceed 30" in height from the ground. b) Create handicapped accessible path from building to public sidewalk along N. Betty Lane per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). c) Construct sidewalk on N. Betty Lane along property's frontage. d) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. e) No TIF owed, credits of$13,999.50 are greater than the calculated TIF of$12,704.00. 4. General Ene:ineerine:: a) No comments. 5. Plannine:: b) Revise the application to include the 1215 N. Betty Lane address, both parcel numbers (Parcel No. 10/29/15/69048/005/0150 and 10/29/15/69048/005/0160) and both legal descriptions. c) Revise the application to provide the property owner's name and change the parcel size to 0.62 acre. d) The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office indicates the present owner of 1211 North Betty Lane to be Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., while the application indicates the owner to be the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Which is correct? If it is Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., then change the application and the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. e) We are still awaiting the submission of the original survey (signed and sealed - one copy). t) Revise the site plan on Sheet C2 for "Site Data" to indicate the entire parcel size of 0.62 acre and that all site data is based on the entire site size of 0.62 acre (26,929.96 square feet). Revise the site data to indicate "existing," "proposed" and "required" for the proposal. Indicate setbacks to building, pavement and to ramping/stairs. g) While the survey indicates the existing trees on the south parcel, the site/landscape plan does not indicate the drip lines for these existing trees, nor whether the trees are to be preserved or removed. Revise. h) Revise the site plan to curb the edge of pavement with six-inch concrete vertical curbing along the east edge of the parking lot. FLD2003-09048 - Page 1 of 3 i) Revise tae plan to connect the sidewalk adjacent to th.th side of the parking lot to the handicap ramp on the east side of the building. j) Unclear why the western and eastern stair configuration is different on the southern building from the northern building, yet the buildings are the same (?). Advise/revise. k) Dimension the distance from the front property line to the edge of pavement (north and south of the driveway). The drawing indicates the edge of pavement at approximately 23 feet from the front property line, which requires the application request a reduction from the 25-foot front setback. I) Indicate that existing driveway(s) no longer to be used will be removed and upright curbing installed within the right-of-way. m) Dimension the width and length of the southern building on Sheet C2. n) Show required sight triangles (20-foot x 20-foot), measured along the front property line and both sides of the driveway. 0) All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on- site. p) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screemng. q) Depict on the site/landscape plan by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area). Provide the square footage of interior landscape area proposed and expressed as a percentage of the proposed vehicular use area. r) Show on the site plan set the existing/proposed sidewalk within the N. Betty Lane right-of- way. s) Provide the gross floor area for this site (not building coverage), in terms of square footage and in relation to the square footage of the overall site. t) Provide the basis for the parking required on the site plan (one space for each two residents). u) Provide the required base flood elevation required for these buildings. v) Provide the building height from base flood elevation to the midpoint of the roof. w) Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. x) Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. y) Provide a copy of the permit inquiry letter or Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) permit submittal (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable. z) Address any proposed signage (location, area and color). aa) Provide the proposed colors (paint samples, etc.) of the building exterior. bb) Revise the request to include the reduction of the front setback (to pavement). Revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to include the requested reduction. cc) Revise the response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3, as a residential shelter is not a permitted use within the Commercial District. This is the purpose of the request. dd) For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), please provide rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy of each). 6. Solid Waste: a) Include city dumpster enclosure on detail sheet. 7. Land Resources: a) The 20" tree at the NE comer and the (2) 22" at the SE comers are exotic Australian pines and should be removed. Show this requirement on the plans prior to building permit. b) Modify top of bank to be at least 11' away from the 11" Cypress tree. Show this requirement on the plans prior to D.O. 8. Fire: a) PROVIDE 28' FT TURN RADIUS FOR BOTH SIDES OF DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. b) HOW MANY BEDROOMS WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT HAVE? c) WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT PROVIDE EMERGENCY HOUSING FOR AN INDIVIDUAL OR (1) ONE SINGLE FAMILY OR WILL THERE BE (2) TWO OR (3) UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS OR FAMILIES OCCUPYING SEPARATE BEDROOMS WHILE SHARING THE SAME KITCHEN & BATH FACILITIES? PLEASE EXPLAIN. d) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE - 2001 EDITION 9. Environmental: a) A IS-foot buffer zone (from the creek-top of bank) is required. FLD2003-09048 - Page 2 of 3 10. Communitvtaonse: . a) No comment. Landscapine:: a) Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3-1202.D. Install hedges on the north and south property lines with a tree every 35' and submit revised plans. b) Landscape Plan does not show the sight triangles as described in Article 3, Division 9, revise the plan to show these triangles at all the street and driveway intersections. c) Per Section 3-1204.D, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Indicate the curbing on plans accordingly. 11. NOTES: Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon. FLD2003-09048 - Page 3 of 3 1 . . .. CITY OF CLEARWATER PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LoNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 7, 2003 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, Florida 33755 RE: Flexible Development application (Case No. FLD2003-09048) to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted an eight unit/bed residential shelter at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B]. Dear Ms. Green: The Planning Staff has reviewed your Flexible Development application (Case No. FLD2003- 09048) to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted an eight unit/bed residential shelter at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B]. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. While not part of a completeness review, I have provided preliminary information about the sufficiency of the application. More comments will be provided by the Development Review Committee (DRC) prior to or at the DRC meeting. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bll.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT A.I\lD AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . . October 7, 2003 Green - Page 2 General Comments related to the sufficiency of the application: 1. Revise the application to include the 1215 N. Betty Lane address, both parcel numbers (Parcel No. 10/29/15/69048/005/0150 and 10/29/15/69048/005/0160) and both legal descriptions. 2. Revise the application to provide the property owner's name and change the parcel size to 0.62 acre. 3. The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office indicates the present owner of 1211 North Betty Lane to be Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., while the application indicates the owner to be the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Which is correct? If it is Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., then change the application and the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. 4. We are still awaiting the submission of the original survey (signed and sealed - one copy). 5. Revise the site plan on Sheet C2 for "Site Data" to indicate the entire parcel size of 0.62 acre and that all site data is based on the entire site size of 0.62 acre (26,929.96 square feet). Revise the site data to indicate "existing," "proposed" and "required" for the proposal. Indicate setbacks to building, pavement and to ramping/stairs. 6. While the survey indicates the existing trees on the south parcel, the site/landscape plan does not indicate the drip lines for these existing trees, nor whether the trees are to be preserved or removed. Revise. 7. Revise the site plan to curb the edge of pavement with six-inch concrete vertical curbing along the east edge of the parking lot. 8. Revise the site plan to connect the sidewalk adjacent to the south side ofthe parking lot to the handicap ramp on the east side of the building. 9. Unclear why the western stair configuration is different on the southern building from the northern building, yet the buildings are the same (?). Advise/revise. 10. Dimension the distance from the front property line to the edge of pavement (north and south of the driveway). The drawing indicates the edge of pavement at approximately 23 feet from the front property line, which requires the application request a reduction from the 25-foot front setback. 11. Indicate that existing driveway(s) no longer to be used will be removed and upright curbing installed within the right-of-way. 12. Dimension the width and length of the southern building on Sheet C2. 13. Show required sight triangles (20-foot x 20-foot), measured along the front property line and both sides of the driveway. 14. All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-site. 15. Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screenmg. . . .. October 7, 2003 Green - Page 3 16. Depict on the site/landscape plan by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area). Provide the square footage of interior landscape area proposed and expressed as a percentage of the proposed vehicular use area. 17. Show on the site plan set the existing/proposed sidewalk within the N. Betty Lane right- of-way. 18. Provide the gross floor area for this site (not building coverage), in terms of square footage and in relation to the square footage ofthe overall site. 19. Provide the basis for the parking required on the site plan (one space for each two residents). 20. Provide the required base flood elevation required for these buildings. 21. Provide the building height from base flood elevation to the midpoint of the roof. 22. Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 23. Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. 24. Provide a copy of the permit inquiry letter or Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) permit submittal (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable. 25. Address any proposed signage (location, area and color). 26. Provide the proposed colors (paint samples, etc.) ofthe building exterior. 27. Revise the request to include the reduction of the front setback (to pavement). Revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to include the requested reduction. 28. Revise the response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3, as a residential shelter is not a permitted use within the Commercial District. This is the purpose of the request. 29. For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), it would be helpful to have rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy). Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and revised documents submitted to the Planning Department by noon on November 6,2003 (15 copies of all submittals). The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on October 30, 2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. . . . October 7, 2003 Green - Page 4 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com. *Make us your favorite! Sincerely, Jf.z~. ~;/tc~ Senior Planner Cc: Michael Reineke, Wade-Trim \IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next DRCIBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency ProjectlBetty N 1211 -1215 Complete Letter. doc I l .. . . LL >- o FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARW A TER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: \S c.J.:\ccre... c;, f":~ / M. ~'-'- \ ~ '; ~ \U FAX: . 4-~ ~.. 4-~ I .r <b \ 3 - ~ ~ +. s-q 'lO Phone: 4-+'2....., 0 +1 ce \ ~... e'C '2.. - B'3 l, \0 FROM: WO""Y'4-- Wo..\\~ Phone:~1o 2..- + :rot DATE:~ 19/~o~ RE:---Ft-O~o3 - ()C) O~ \2...\\ - \1.\.S" N:l1t.""J ~ MESSAGE: ~\t~ l.t.~ - Dr-:'~"\r-L\.c; bQ.\"j ~~. NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) S- , DATE,TIME FAX ~~O./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 10/06 21:33 94434875 00:02:40 05 OK STANDARD ECM TIME 10/06/2003 21:36 NAME PLAN FAX 7275624576 TEL 7275624567 i. DATE, TIME FAX NO. !NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE ANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 1121/1215 21:38 98138845990 121121:1212:41 1215 OK STANDARD ECM TIME 1121/1215/21211213 21:41 NAME PLAN FAX 7275524575 TEL 7275524557 "I .'""~,, ..~~f1.LOF Tlflit+ ~\~~\ . " ,.""'''''- ';7~+"'" "'L", .... ~;#y....... ~..~" I ~'<:' ... ..c::.;s~',\// . ~~':; l\C":)~~L'-::::::'c '..! "<C"I "'r::~"=';:"Z4II""''' "'~. c.."c.~.c.".C.". :--I~. "P:~'''''_' ~.. "~A'". ~:::~:: ,'~j" ~{1l.4TE~~~~\\ ~'Jf".6...f . . CITY OF CLEARWATER . , PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIWING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LoNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 18,2003 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane ClealWater, FL 33755 Re: Grant Application Information -1211 North Betty Lane Dear Ms. Green: This is in response to your request for zoning confirmation for the above referenced site. 1. Describe the project proposal, including all specific uses of the property, such as, offices, counseling, food bank, shelter, etc. (please print): Proposed use is an eiaht-bed (eiaht unit) transitional housina (residential shelter). 2. Project Address: 1211 North Bettv Lane. ClealWater. FL 3. Legal Description: Lot 15. Block E. Pinebrook Unit 2. as recorded in Plat Book 23. Paae 71 of the public records of Pinellas County. Florida (Parcel 10 10/29/15/69047/005/0150). 4. Current Zoning category of above location: C. Commercial District. 5. Is the project considered a Social Service Agency? Yes No X 6. Has the above site been previously approved for use as a Social Service Agency? Yes (If yes, give SE# ) No X BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER (1) BII.LjONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" " \ . . , , " 7. Is there a current Occupational License available on this property? Yes (If yes, provide a copy of Occupational License with application) No X 8. What is the current Occupational License at this site? None - An Occupational License will be required prior to occupancy. X Zoning is an approved use of property identified in number one. Zoning can only be approved after the following contingencies are met: 9. Application for a Special Exception must be approved. X Variances are required and an application must be approved. List variances necessary: A Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect to allow a residential shelter for transitional housina will be required to be approved bv the Community Development Board after public hearina. and include any setback reductions necessary. Other: Zoning cannot be approved without application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, as the proposed project is not a permitted use for the site. re of the Z icial: .. 10. a Date: Auaust 18. 2003 isa L. Fierce, Assistant Planning Director I\MS5cIPDSIPlanning DeparlmentlC 0 BIFLEXllnactive or Finished ApplicationslBetty N 1215 Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. - ApprovedlGrant Zoning Justification Form for 1211 N. Betty Lane 8. 18. 03. doc ,-- . . ~~~ <<~\.lLoF T/(ZJ~ l~.~.p ,~e:s )I/~~ ~~ R,'C"':>> -, ,~~ ~.-:: ~ ~~ ~~- ~~~. ~~~~~~~.~~ ~~~J'PJ CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 12,2003 Ms. Barbara Green Executive Director Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: 1211 North Betty Lane Dear Ms. Green: It is the Planning Department's understanding that the property at 1211 North Betty Lane is for sale. It is currently zoned Commercial District and is consistent with its underlying land use designation of CG, Commercial General Category. Attached is a copy of the current Commercial zoning district regulations, as contained within the Community Development Code. The Housing Emergency Project (HEP) has received approval from the City to construct an eight unit residential shelter at 1215 North Betty Lane directly north of the property in question. The Community Development Board (CDB) on June 18, 2002, approved with conditions a Flexible Development application, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, of a multi-property plan for the improvement and expansion of HEP services that included the 1215 North Betty Lane (Case No. FLD 02-04-09, see attached Development Order). On December 17, 2002, the CDB approved with conditions a revision to this prior approval for the 1215 North Betty Lane property only, relating to setback reductions (Case FLD 02-04-09A, see attached Development Order). Further, it is the Planning Department's understanding that the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. (HEP) is seeking funding for the property acquisition and construction for an eight unit residential shelter at 1211 North Betty Lane. HEP will need to make application for CDB approval of this use as an expansion of the "master plan" as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. I am attaching a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Flexible Development application form for your use. Should you have additional questions, please contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner (727-562-4504). Zoning designation information is available through the City's website at www.clearwater-fl.com via the "Clearwater Parcel and Zoning" link. ~~ -J~ Development Review Manager S:IP/anning Departmentlzoning /trsl/ 2/ / N. Betty Lane.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . ' PLANNING IEPARTMENT 100 S, MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 PHONE: 727-562-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865 _EN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2005249955 06/28/2005 at 09:45 AM OFF REC BK: 14412 PG: 1007-1008 DocType:NOTICE RECORDING: $18.50 DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE Property Owner: I Homeless EmeTgen~y Project Property Address: 1211 & 1215 N. Betty Lane. Clearwater~ FL 317'i'i KNOW OF ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to the ordinances of the City of Clearwater pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being the fee owner (s) of the following described real property situated in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit: See Attached nExhibit An do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars: 1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building site. 2. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one plot or parcel of land. 3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned, and all parties claiming under them until such time as the same may be released in writing under the order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument shall be recorded in the public records of Pine lIas County, Florida, Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this at Clearwater, Florida. 'I'~ day of ,j V\. V\.. L ,20QL, OWNER (S): .-wI~ ~~y~" ~~~ , ,/) i ' . ',MY . ' ,--'-<}' r C:;r-'<:. ';:-..,,; A. 'F (, .... STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I t'~ day of ~ L-'-"l.~ , 20~, by I') f"VU <- {-=-, F".... (:t" ("I-e.\o'k_> on behalf of whom the instrument was executed. t. \ ------<; ~ c i\c..J' . ..~~[J~ Gregory A. Fox l!(li.';'~ Commission # 00338456 ~~-&~ Expires August 5, 2008 "~iff. r.\" Bonded Troy FWI' _nee, Inc:. !lQO-3M-7019 (SEAL ABOVE) . )., ~/Il c\ Y'l'>c " " Notary Public Signature Name of Notary Printed Notary Commission Number: Personally known ./ or produced identification Type of identification produced S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\Unity of Title Declaration 200S,doc " e e "Exhibit A" Lot 15, Block E of Pine brook Subdivision, Unit No.2, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 71, ofthe Public Records of Pin ell as County, Florida. and Lot 16, Block E of Pine brook Subdivision, Unit No.2, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 71, ofthe Public Records of Pin ell as County, Florida. . . MEMORANDUM RE: Members of the Community Development Bo~rd/ Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner yJ1w FLD2003-09048, 1211-1215 North Betty Lane December 16, 2003 ORIGINAL TO: FROM: DATE: Due to coordination ofHUD guidelines and funding, condition #6 should be amended to: 1.* That any change in ownership on Site A (retail thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community Development Board (CDB); 2. * That the landscape plan for Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the northeast comer of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits for Site C improvements; 3. * That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards; 4. * That the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings; 5. * That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 6. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy building permit for the southern building; 7. That each residential shelter building be for a maximum of eight unitslbeds; 8. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building, the site plan be revised to relocate the southern handicap parking space to the west end of the parking row to meet accessibility requirements; 9. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building to ensure compliance with the landscape provisions of the Code for tree types and to resolve conflicts of landscaping with the proposed southern building and/or parking area; and 10. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located underground. (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) \IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXiPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C) (C1RP - res. shelter)IMemorandum re amended conditions #6 12. 16.03.doc ,--11 . . CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Applicant: Representative: Address: December 16, 2003 FLD2003-09048 E5 Homeless Emergency Proiect, Inc. Ms, Barbara Green 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane REVISED ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect, . under the provisions of Section 2-704. C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 North Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.C]. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: C, Commercial District; CG, Commercial General Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.62 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Residential Shelter (under construction) and sail maker (closed) Proposed Use: Residential Shelters (two; each with eight unitslbeds) ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Open Space/Recreation District; Stevenson Creek West: Commercial District; Retail, storage East: Low Medium Density Residential District; Stevenson Creek, S ingle- family residential South: Commercial District; Vacant Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page I ." . . CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings are to the east, with limited commercial uses on the east and west sides of North Betty Lane south of Stevenson Creek. ANAL YSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.62-acre overall site is located on the east side of North Betty Lane, across from Engman Street. The original application (FLD 02-04-09, approved by the Community Development Board [CDB] on June 18, 2002, with five conditions) included three sites (Sites A, B and C) processed under an "umbrella" use of Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, as a means to review a "master plan" for development. The original site at 1215 North Betty Lane (Site B) was 0.35 acres, had 110 feet of frontage along North Betty Lane and was approved by the CDB for a residential shelter for eight unitslbeds and included front (west) setback reductions to pavement, building and the western stairway and a rear (east) setback reduction to stairway ramping. On December 17, 2002, the CDB approved a Flexible Development application (FLD 02-04-09A) with six conditions (the five original plus one new condition), as a revision to the previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for Site B for the residential shelter, in order to relocate the building to the north by reducing the north side setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and by further reducing the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping). The purpose of that revision was to provide adequate area for development should the property to the immediate south of this lot (1211 North Betty Lane) be acquired to provide a similar residential shelter in the future. Both lots are zoned Commercial District. Residential shelters are not a permitted use in the Commercial District, thereby requiring Flexible Development approval as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit the use. The northern lot was previously developed with a retail sales building, while the southern lot was developed with a commercial building used by a sail maker. Proposal: The proposal includes the construction of a similar two-story, eight unitlbed residential shelter of permanent supportive housing for homeless persons with disabilities on property at 1211 North Betty Lane as was previously approved, and currently under construction, on the original property at 1215 North Betty Lane. The residential shelter buildings will situate on the north and south sides of a common parking area of 16 spaces. The proposed buildings will be of similar design and color, which will have an exterior stucco finish (beige with white columns, railing and trim) and shingle roof (gray with greenish accent). The proposed buildings are located on low- lying lots that must be elevated to meet FEMA requirements. To meet Building Code requirements, the second floor is required to have stairways on the east and west sides of each building. The first floor of each building will be handicap accessible. The handicap ramping for the northern building at 1215 North Betty Lane (under construction) is on the east side of the building. In order to avoid conflicts with the proposed retention pond, the proposal includes handicap ramping (unenclosed) for the southern building to be placed on the west side of the building at a front setback of 17 feet, where 25 feet is required by Code. The stairway on the west side of the southern building meets the required front setback and the southern building exceeds the front setback requirement (proposed at 33 feet front setback). Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 2 I . e The proposal also includes a front setback reduction to proposed pavement from 25 feet to 23 feet to allow a similar design for both parking areas north and south of the common drive (a setback reduction to pavement for the parking on the north side of the drive was previously granted by the CDB). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the site plan will need to be revised to relocate the southern handicap parking space to the west end of the parking row to meet accessibility requirements. A dumpster is proposed on the east end of the parking lot to provide for trash collection for both residential shelter buildings. No freestanding signage is proposed. All proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, will need to be located underground. The development of these residential buildings, parking area and landscape improvements will enhance the appearance of this overall site and the surrounding area. In order to ensure compliance with the landscape provisions of the Code for tree types and to resolve conflicts of landscaping with the proposed southern building and/or parking area, the landscape plan will need to be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 3 . . COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.37 X AREA RATIO (FAR) (0.55) IMPERVIOUS 0.47 X SURFACE RATIO (lSR) (0.95) LOT AREA 0.62 acre; 26,930 square feet X (minimum) (N/A) LOT WIDTH 185 feet X (minimum) (N/A) FRONT SETBACK Northern building: 15 feet (to stairway) X* (25 feet) and 23 feet (to building & pavement); Southern building: 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and 23 feet (to pavement) REAR SETBACK (20 Northern building: eight feet (to X* feet) stairway ramping), 22 feet (to stairway) and 24 feet (to building); Southern building: 47 feet (to stairway) SIDE SETBACK (10 Northern building: four feet; X** feet) Southern buildin2:: 19 feet HEIGHT (maximum) Northern and southern buildings: 21.5 X (N/A) feet PARKING SPACES 16 spaces X (one space per two residents; eight required) *See discussion for reductions under Analysis. **Previously granted a reduction under FLD 02-04-09A. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 4 . . COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-704.C): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Consistent Inconsistent x x x x x x x x x Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 5 ,-- I . . Consistent Inconsistent COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. x x x x X X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on October 30, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 North Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B] for the site at 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane, with the following bases and conditions. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1.* That any change in ownership on Site A (retail thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community Development Board (CDB); 2.* That the landscape plan for Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the northeast comer of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits for Site C improvements; Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 6 - . . 3. * That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards; 4. * That the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings; 5. * That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 6. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy building permit for the southern building; 7. That each residential shelter building be for a maximum of eight units/beds; 8. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building, the site plan be revised to relocate the southern handicap parking space to the west end of the parking row to meet accessibility requirements; 9. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building to ensure compliance with the landscape provisions of the Code for tree types and to resolve conflicts of landscaping with the proposed southern building and/or parking area; and 10. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located underground. (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application \\MS5c\PDS\P1anning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Betty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C)\Betty N 1211- 1215 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 7 e. -. CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Applicant: Representative: Address: December 16, 2003 FLD2003-09048 E5 Homeless Emergency Proiect, Inc. Ms. Barbara Green 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane OR/8/N4l CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ST AFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 North Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.C]. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: C, Commercial District; CG, Commercial General Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.62 acres PROPERTY USE: maker (closed) Current Use: Residential Shelter (under construction) and sail Proposed Use: Residential Shelters (two; each with eight unitslbeds) ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Open Space/Recreation District; Stevenson Creek West: Commercial District; Retail, storage East: Low Medium Density Residential District; Stevenson Creek, Single- family residential South: Commercial District; Vacant Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 1 e. -. CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings are to the east, with limited commercial uses on the east and west sides of North Betty Lane south of Stevenson Creek. ANAL YSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.62-acre overall site is located on the east side of North Betty Lane, across from Engman Street. The original application (FLD 02-04-09, approved by the Community Development Board [CDB] on June 18, 2002, with five conditions) included three sites (Sites A, B and C) processed under an "umbrella" use of Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, as a means to review a "master plan" for development. The original site at 1215 North Betty Lane (Site B) was 0.35 acres, had 110 feet of frontage along North Betty Lane and was approved by the CDB for a residential shelter for eight unitslbeds and included front (west) setback reductions to pavement, building and the western stairway and a rear (east) setback reduction to stairway ramping. On December 17, 2002, the CDB approved a Flexible Development application (FLD 02-04-09A) with six conditions (the five original plus one new condition), as a revision to the previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for Site B for the residential shelter, in order to relocate the building to the north by reducing the north side setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and by further reducing the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping). The purpose of that revision was to provide adequate area for development should the property to the immediate south of this lot (1211 North Betty Lane) be acquired to provide a similar residential shelter in the future. Both lots are zoned Commercial District. Residential shelters are not a permitted use in the Commercial District, thereby requiring Flexible Development approval as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit the use. The northern lot was previously developed with a retail sales building, while the southern lot was developed with a commercial building used by a sail maker. Proposal: The proposal includes the construction of a similar two-story, eight unitlbed residential shelter of permanent supportive housing for homeless persons with disabilities on property at 1211 North Betty Lane as was previously approved, and currently under construction, on the original property at 1215 North Betty Lane. The residential shelter buildings will situate on the north and south sides of a common parking area of 16 spaces. The proposed buildings will be of similar design and color, which will have an exterior stucco finish (beige with white columns, railing and trim) and shingle roof (gray with greenish accent). The proposed buildings are located on low- lying lots that must be elevated to meet FEMA requirements. To meet Building Code requirements, the second floor is required to have stairways on the east and west sides of each building. The first floor of each building will be handicap accessible. The handicap ramping for the northern building at 1215 North Betty Lane (under construction) is on the east side of the building. In order to avoid conflicts with the proposed retention pond, the proposal includes handicap ramping (unenclosed) for the southern building to be placed on the west side of the building at a front setback of 17 feet, where 25 feet is required by Code. The stairway on the west side of the southern building meets the required front setback and the southern building exceeds the front setback requirement (proposed at 33 feet front setback). The proposal also includes a front setback reduction to proposed pavement from 25 feet to 23 feet to allow a similar design for Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 2 e. -. both parking areas north and south of the common drive (a setback reduction to pavement for the parking on the north side ofthe drive was previously granted by the CDB). Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the site plan will need to be revised to relocate the southern handicap parking space to the west end of the parking row to meet accessibility requirements. A dumpster is proposed on the east end of the parking lot to provide for trash collection for both residential shelter buildings. No freestanding signage is proposed. All proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, will need to be located underground. The development of these residential buildings, parking area and landscape improvements will enhance the appearance of this overall site and the surrounding area. In order to ensure compliance with the landscape provisions of the Code for tree types and to resolve conflicts of landscaping with the proposed southern building and/or parking area, the landscape plan will need to be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 704.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 3 e. -. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1 and 2-704): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.37 X AREA RATIO (FAR) (0.55) IMPERVIOUS 0.47 X SURFACE RATIO (lSR) (0.95) LOT AREA 0.62 acre; 26,930 square feet X (minimum) (N/A) LOT WIDTH 185 feet X (minimum) (N/ A) FRONT SETBACK Northern building: 15 feet (to stairway) X* (25 feet) and 23 feet (to building & pavement); Southern building: 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and 23 feet (to pavement) REAR SETBACK (20 Northern building: eight feet (to X* feet) stairway ramping), 22 feet (to stairway) and 24 feet (to building); Southern building: 47 feet (to stairway) SIDE SETBACK (10 Northern building: four feet; X** feet) Southern buildinll: 19 feet HEIGHT (maximum) Northern and southern buildings: 21.5 X (N/A) feet PARKING SPACES 16 spaces X (one space per two residents; eight required) *See discussion for reductions under Analysis. **Previously granted a reduction under FLD 02-04-09A. Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 4 e. -. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-704.C): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Consistent Inconsistent X X X X X X X X X Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 5 e. -. Consistent Inconsistent COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. x x x x X X SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on October 30, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet ( to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 North Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B] for the site at 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane, with the following bases and conditions. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. * That any change in ownership on Site A (retail thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community Development Board (CDB); 2.* That the landscape plan for Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the northeast comer of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits for Site C improvements; Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 6 e. -. 3.* That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards; 4. * That the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings; 5. * That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 6. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building; 7. That each residential shelter building be for a maximum of eight units/beds; 8. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building, the site plan be revised to relocate the southern handicap parking space to the west end of the parking row to meet accessibility requirements; 9. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building to ensure compliance with the landscape provisions of the Code for tree types and to resolve conflicts of landscaping with the proposed southern building and/or parking area; and 10. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located underground. (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: tJ. rJ- f1. Wayn M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application \\MS5c\PDS\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Betty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C)\Betty N 1211-1215 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09048 - Page 7 . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Dittmer, Arden Friday, November 07,20032:26 PM Wells, Wayne RE: FLD2003-09048, 1211-1215 N. Betty Lane Just saw the dumpster enclosure on sheet IC_2" which will not work well later when they want to pick up the trash and the oaks have overgrown the area of the dumpster. Recommending changing out the two oaks with Dahoon holly prior to building plan approval. Other conditions have been met. Arden Dittmer Development Review Specialist City of Clearwater (727)562-4567 ext.2563 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 07,2003 11:56 AM To: Albee, Rick; Anderson, Duanne; Berry, Bryan; Clayton, Gina; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Frank; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Mariano, Marc; Melone, Donald; Morris, William; Nicodemus, Sherrie; Parry, Mark; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Schodtler, John; Yellin, Catherine Subject: FLD2003-09048, 1211-1215 N. Betty Lane DRC Members - Revised plans have been submitted in response to comments made at the October 30,2003, DRC meeting for the above referenced project. I have placed ONE set of plans and documents on top of the file cabinets outside the Planning/Building Departments conference room 216. Please stop by ASAP to review these revisions to determine whether they have complied with your comments. This proiect is tentatively to be scheduled for the Community Development Board for the December 16. 2003. meetinq pendinq your review as to sufficiency. Please revise Permit Plan accordingly and send me an emailletting me know you have completed your review. If some aspect of the proposal can be handled through a condition on the approval of the case by the COB, then put same under conditions under Permit Plan. Thanks - Wayne Following is the Final comments from the 10/30/03 DRC meeting: <<File: Betty N 1211 - 1215 Final DRC Comments 10.30.03.doc>> 1 .. 1:00 p.m. . . Case: FLD2003-09048 - 1211 - 1215 North Betty Lane Owner/Applicant: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Representative: Ms. Barbara Green (1120 North Betty Lane, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-442- 9041; fax: 727-443-4875). Location: 0.62 acres located on the east side of North Betty Lane, across from Engman Street. Atlas Page: 269B. Zoning: C, Commercial District. Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight units/beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted an eight unit/bed residential shelter at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-704.B). Proposed Use: Residential shelter of eight units/beds. Neighborhood Association: None. Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson, Rick Albee, and Scott Rice. Applicant/Representative: Mike Holmes, Michael Reineke, and Barbara Green The DRC review/d this application with the following comments: ..,/1. Parks and Recreation: a) No P&R comment since residential shelters are exempt from Recreation impact fees and property is less than 1 acre. Stormwater: a) Overflow flume for pond (Detail A) weir elevation is shown at EL=4.5. This is lower than the pond bottom and needs to be raised to the DHWL. b) Weir Invert at flume (Detail B) also needs to be raised above DHWL. Traffic Enl!ineerinl!: a) Show on the site plan 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the access point/driveway. Objects inside the visibility triangle must not exceed 30" in height from the ground. b) Create handicapped accessible path from building to public sidewalk along N. Betty Lane per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). c) Construct sidewalk on N. Betty Lane along property's frontage. d) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. e) No TlF owed, credits of$13,999.50 are greater than the calculated TIF of $ 12,704.00. General Enl!ineerine:: a) No comments. Planninl!: ~~... <; h c.... '2.. ~ \~\ "~Q. kr \S'" CZ> Revise the application to include the 1215 N. Betty Lane address, both parcel numbers (Parcel J No. 10/29/15/69048/005/0150 and 10/29/15/69048/005/0160) and both legal descriptions. "c) Revise the application to provide the property owner's name and change the parcel size to 0.62 acre. J d) The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office indicates the present owner of 1211 North Betty Lane to be Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., while the application indicates the owner to be the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Which is correct? If it is Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., then change the application and the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. Weare still awaiting the submission of the original survey (signed and sealed - one copy). Revise the site plan on Sheet C2 for "Site Data" to indicate the entire parcel size of 0.62 acre and that all site data is based on the entire site size of 0.62 acre (26,929.96 square feet). Revise the site data to indicate "existing," "proposed" and "required" for the proposal. Indicate setbacks to building, pavement and to ramping/stairs. While the survey indicates the existing trees on the south parcel, the site/landscape plan does not indicate the drip lines for these existing trees, nor whether the trees are to be preserved or J removed. Revise. h) Revise the site plan to curb the edge of pavement with six-inch concrete vertical curbing along the east edge of the parking lot. 2. 3. )4. 5. -7~~je) \, "J f) - se-- II 'P"~' ~~~ ~ ~~( ~ ~~ J ) ~ 'iXI-.....<' , g ~~ ,1 1'V=- ~ Page 1 of3 J i) Revise tae plan to connect the sidewalk adjacent to theJth side of the parking lot to the j handicap ramp on the east side of the building. j) Unclear why the western and eastern stair configuration is different on the southern building J from the northern building, yet the buildings are the same (?). Advise/revise. k) Dimension the distance from the front property line to the edge of pavement (north and south of the driveway). The drawing indicates the edge of pavement at approximately 23 feet from the front property line, which requires the application request a reduction from the 25-foot front setback. It) Indicate that existing driveway(s) no longer to be used will be removed and upright curbing J installed within the right-of-way. ~ Dimension the width and length of the southern building on Sheet C2. -rAY ')r ~ Show required sight triangles (20-foot x 20-foot), measured along the front property line and U.C'--" both sides of the driveway. ~'-#- @ All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on- -\~~.U- ~ site. . 5~ -:.' ~..~ ~ Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required ~.." ~ :,,~~ screening. ,. ~~ -.,.\ @ Depict on the site/landscape plan by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior ~,~ landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area). Provide the square footage of interior J landscape area proposed and expressed as a percentage of the proposed vehicular use area. r) Show on the site plan set the existing/proposed sidewalk within the N. Betty Lane right-of- J way. s) Provide the gross floor area for this site (not building coverage), in terms of square footage ~ and in relation to the square footage of the overall site. ~;),- C"" ~~~ r t Provide the basis for the parking required on the site plan (one space for each two residents). ., u) Provide the required base flood elevation required for these buildings. ~v) Provide the building height from base flood elevation to the midpoint of the roof. 0_ _ 'E...""- A J w) Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. l--k=....~. ~ l'- (Jj) Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including -\0 c)r.~'" s.~ .... instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. Gt" h ~ ~ 1. '2.\ ~ j y) Provide a copy of the permit inquiry letter or Southwest Florida Water Management District ~ \... _~ ....... ~ (SWFWMD) permit submittal (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City \ "1' ~ Nr- · -, J Building Permit), if applicable. z) Address any proposed signage (location, area and color). GiI)Provide the proposed colors (paint samples, etc.) of the building exterior. Jbi)) Revise the request to include the reduction of the front setback (to pavement). Revise the responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to include the requested reduction. j cc) Revise the response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3, as a residential shelter is not a permitted use within the Commercial District. This is the purpose of the request. ) dd) For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), please provide rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy of each). j ee) New comment: Revise the survey(s) for Lots 15 & 16 to indicate the Range as Range 15 East, not Range 19 East. J Solid Waste: a) Include city dumpster enclosure on detail sheet. Land Resources: J a) The 20" tree at the NE comer and the (2) 22" at the SE comers are exotic Australian pines and J should be removed. Show this requirement on the plans prior to building permit. b) Modify top of bank to be at least II' away from the 11" Cypress tree. Show this requirement on the plans prior to D.O. I Fire: a) PROVIDE 28' FT TURN RADIUS FOR BOTH SIDES OF DRIVEWAY WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. IF ALREADY CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE 1215 NORTH j BETTY LANE PERMIT, DISREGARD THIS COMMENT. JIt b) HOW MANY BEDROOMS WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT HAVE? c) WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT PROVIDE EMERGENCY HOUSING FOR AN INDIVIDUAL OR (1) ONE SINGLE FAMILY OR WILL THERE BE (2) TWO OR (3) UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS OR FAMILIES OCCUPYING SEPARATE BEDROOMS j d) WHILE SHARING THE SAME KITCHEN & BATH FACILITIES? PLEASE EXPLAIN. CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE - 2001 EDITION L . ')ta.-" \ ~ \ ('~ ,,-S I i: 8. Page 2 of3 . . 9. 10. Jll. g,t. ~(J b) S~.~c-r JC) ,.. ~~ ~. \/ \). EnVironmene e a) A IS-foot buffer zone (from the creek-top of bank) is required. Communitv Response: a) No comment. Landscapine: Ja) Plan does not meet the requirements of perimeter plantings in Code Section 3-1202.D. Install hedges on the north and south property lines with a tree every 35' and submit revised plans. Landscape Plan does not show the sight triangles as described in Article 3, Division 9, revise the plan to show these triangles at all the street and driveway intersections. Per Section 3-1204.D, all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Indicate the curbing on plans accordingly. NOTES: Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments' comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon. I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlPending cases I up for the next DRCIBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency ProjectlFinal DRC Comments JO.30.03.doc Page 3 of3 ~ TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLD2003-09048 1211 N BETTY LN 11/13/2003 4:14:53PM .. " Amendment Application Received FLDD070 Traffic Eng Review 9/25/2003 None HOLD BE 10/13/200: I) Show on the site plan 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the B E access point/driveway. Objects inside the visibility triangle must not exceed 30" in height from the ground. 2) Create handicapped accessible path from building to public sidewalk along N. Betty Lane per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). . 3) Construct sidewalk on N. Betty Lane along property's frontage. 4) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. J 9/25/2003 5) No TIF owed, credits of$13,999.50 are greater than the calculated TIF of $12,704.00. FLDD080 Engineering Review 10/20/200: None DONE SR 10/20/200: No Comments S R FLDA245 Documents attached in J9/25/2003 None 9/25/2003 PP1an SLN FLDA235 Letter To Abutting ProJ 9/25/2003 None 9/25/2003 Owner SLN FLDA230 Letter of completenessJ 9/25/2003 10/7/2003 None DONE WW 10/6/2003 WW . J FLDA244 D.O. Mailed Out 9/25/2003 None 9/25/2003 SLN FLDA018 Tree Survey Reed J 9/25/2003 10/3/2003 HwO DONE RA 10/3/2003 RA FLDA130 Map Created J 9/25/2003 None 9/25/2003 SLN Page I 00 CaseActivity..rpt ~ TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLD2003-09048 1211 N BETTY LN 11/13/2003 4:14:54PM FLDAOIJ Verify Traffic Impact 9/25/2003 HwO 9/25/2003 Fees SLN FLDD060 kegaI Review 9/25/2003 10/6/2003 None DONE WW 10/6/2003 N/A WW . FLDD050J Land Resource Review 9/25/2003 11/10/200~ 11/10/200~ None DONE RA 11/1 0/200~ See Conditions. RA FLDDOIO Stormwater Review 9/25/2003 None HOLD 1O/16/200~ 1. Overflow flume for pond (Detail A) weir elevation is shown JK at EL=4.5. This is lower than the pond bottom and needs to be raised to the DHWL. 2. Weir Invert at flume (Detail B) also needs to be raised above FLDD020J Fire Review DHWL and below Overflow flume weir elevation. 9/25/2003 10/1/2003 None DONE DA 10/1/2003 a) PROVIDE 28' FT TURN RADIUS DA b) HOW MANY BEDROOMS WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT HAVE? c) WILL EACH APARTMENT UNIT PROVIDE EMERGENCY HOUSING FOR AN INDIVIDUAL OR (I) ONE SINGLE F AMIL Y OR WILL THERE BE (2) TWO OR (3) UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS OR F AMIUES OCCUPYING SEPARATE BEDROOMS e WHILE SHARING TIlE SAME KITCHEN & BA TII FACILITIES? PLEASE EXPLAIN. c) CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITII WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE FLDD03J Park & Rec Review PREVENTION CODE - 2001 EDITION 9/25/2003 1O/16/200~ None DONE DWR 1 0/16/200~ No P&R comment since residential shelters are exempt from DWR Recreation impact fees and property is less than I acre. FLDD04~ Solid Waste Review 9/25/2003 10/7/2003 None DONE TJG 10/7/2003 Include city Dumpster enclosure on detail sheet TJG Page 2 oB CaseActivity..rpt ~ TIDEMARK COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC. Case Activity Listing Case #: FLD2003-09048 1211 N BETTY LN 11/13/2003 4:14:53PM FLDA0401RC Meeting 9/25/2003 10/6/2003 None DONE WW 10/6/2003 DRe 10/30/03. ww FLDD01J CRT Review 9/25/2003 None 9/25/2003 SLN . FLDAO 10 JpP1iCatiOn received 9/25/2003 None DONE SLN 10/6/2003 ww FLDD012Joning Review 9/25/2003 10/7/2003 None HOLD WW 10/6/2003 10/7/03 - WW - See conditions. WW FLDD014 Landscaping Review 9/25/2003 10/8/2003 None HOLD AD 10/8/2003 see conditions AD FLDD042 Environmental Review 9/25/2003 None HOLD HF lO/16/200~ 15 foot buffer zone (from the creek-top of bank) required J K FLDD090JHarbor Master Review 9/25/2003 10/6/2003 None DONE WW 10/6/2003 N/A ww e Page 3 of3 CaseActivity..l]Jt .. · Conditions Associated Wit' FLD2003-09048 1211 N BETTY LN :J . ,.,"1 #4''''*' ..~~ :"S(.!~,.: .' .. ':. ..ftj.."......~~.. "el . ... . ... g: ~~'.::: .;:;:;;.~ .. .. .............................I.'~\' '\.., ~ .....'~ ~~ ,,~ TEUI'o"t ~ 11.,l} Landscape 11/07/2003 ~~.~ ~..~~. c...- v . ~ Arden Dittmer 562-4604 Plans should be changed to reflect the two oaks on either side of the dumpster enclosure being changed out with something that will grow more upright (e.g. Dahoon holly, Upright Bottlebrush, or Pond cypress), so that they won't create a conflict problem with sanitation pick up in the future. Change prior to building permit. Not Met Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 10/19/2003 Revise the application to include the 1215 N. Betty Lane address, both parcel numbers (Parcel NO.1 0/29/15/69048/005/0150 and 10/29/15/69048/005/0160) and both legal descriptions. 10/19/2003 Revise the application to provide the property owner's name and change the parcel size to 0.62 acre. Not Met Not Met 10/19/2003 The Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office indicates the present owner of 1211 North Betty Not Met Lane to be Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., while the application indicates the owner to be the Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Which is correct? If it is Everybody's Tabernacle Inc., then change the application and the Affidavit to Authorize Agent. 10/19/2003 We are still awaiting the submission of the original survey (signed and sealed - one copy). Not Met 10/19/2003 Revise the site plan on Sheet C2 for "Site Data" to indicate the entire parcel size of 0.62 acre and Not Met that all site data is based on the entire site size of 0.62 acre (26,929.96 square feet). Revise the site data to indicate "existing," "proposed" and "required" for the proposal. Indicate setbacks to building, pavement and to ramping/stairs. 10/19/2003 While the survey indicates the existing trees on the south parcel, the site/landscape plan does not Not Met indicate the drip lines for these existing trees, nor whether the trees are to be preserved or removed. Revise. 10/19/2003 Revise the site plan to curb the edge of pavement with six-inch concrete vertical curbing along the Not Met east edge of the parking lot. 10/19/2003 Revise the site plan to connect the sidewalk adjacent to the south side of the parking lot to the Not Met handicap ramp on the east side of the building. 10/19/2003 Unclear why the western stair configuration is different on the southern building from the northern Not Met building, yet the buildings are the same (?). Advise/revise. 10/19/2003 Dimension the distance from the front property line to the edge of pavement (north and south of Not Met the driveway). The drawing indicates the edge of pavement at approximately 23 feet from the front property line, which requires the application request a reduction from the 25-foot front setback. 10/19/2003 Indicate that existing driveway(s) no longer to be used will be removed and upright curbing Not Met installed within the right-of-way. 10/19/2003 Dimension the width and length of the southern building on Sheet C2. Not Met 10/19/2003 Show required sight triangles (20-foot x 20-foot), measured along the front property line and both Not Met sides of the driveway. 10/19/2003 All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-site. Not Met 10/19/2003 Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening. Not Met Print Date: 11/13/2003 CaseConditons 1 of 2 .. .. . . FLD2003-09048 1211 N BETTY LN Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 10/19/2003 Depict on the site/landscape plan by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas (10 percent of the vehicular use area). Provide the square footage of interior landscape area proposed and expressed as a percentage of the proposed vehicular use area. 10/19/2003 Show on the site plan set the existing/proposed sidewalk within the N. Betty Lane right-of-way. 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 10/19/2003 Not Met Not Met Provide the gross floor area for this site (not building coverage), in terms of square footage and in Not Met relation to the square footage of the overall site. Provide the basis for the parking required on the site plan (one space for each two residents). Not Met Provide the required base flood elevation required for these buildings. Not Met Provide the building height from base flood elevation to the midpoint of the roof. Not Met Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Not Met Provide typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Not Met instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures. Provide a copy of the permit inquiry letter or Southwest Florida Water Management District Not Met (SWFWMD) permit submittal (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable. Address any proposed signage (location, area and color). Not Met Provide the proposed colors (paint samples, etc.) of the building exterior. Not Met Revise the request to include the reduction of the front setback (to pavement). Revise the Not Met responses to the General Applicability and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria to include the requested reduction. Revise the response to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3, as a Not Met residential shelter is not a permitted use within the Commercial District. This is the purpose of the request. For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), it would be helpful to have Not Met rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy). CaseConditons Print Date: 11/13/2003 2 of 2 . . Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Subject: Rice, Scott Friday, November 07,2003 11 :36 AM Wells, Wayne FLD2003-09048 - 1211 N Betty Lane Wayne There are still some issues on this application that need to be resolved. I spoke with Mike Reineke of Wade-Trim this morning regarding the outstanding issues. 1. Stormwater Comment b) - The invert of the flume was not revised. Should be 5.0. Shown as 4.5. 2. Traffic Comment a) - The sight triangles are shown as 15' x 15' instead of 20' x 20'. The sight triangles on the Landscaping Plan, Sheet L 1 are not shown at the correct location. 3. Traffic Comment b) - The sidewalk from the public sidewalk to the proposed structure is not continuous. 4. Environmental Comment a) - Since Wade-Trim will be revising the site plan, I asked them to dimension the minimum distance from disturbance to the top of bank of Stevenson Creek. Let me know if you have any questions. Scott Rice Land Deve/. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 srice@clearwater-fl.com 1 FL-D2...D03 .. oCfotB I z' ,.. '2 IS' N. g&~ LA"... ~ 260A ... 260B . 3!~4 ~5 ~6 ! 8 ~ ~ ~ i ISHI 4 5 <!)6 ~ ~l~ 1703 1 ~ ~ 2 3~ t1zm-lm l\ Cl c: :sz " ':E.' c( .... M Ai V cici o M o ~ -- r-. .... -- M o cl ~ " .ci 0- .0 N "i1i lI:l ~ " IS B j fj. c: '8> j U; t:/;2/02 \ rt """ ,,\ 14 e~2 ..~ \ P:"O' 'L,! ", .. 'r;;:-;u'~ '66'=:.~:: I! ~ i;'.~ l 2 ~ ' .8,.'- '''-,:: I -: r~.-~.~.:t~$f.',:~..,':.;J<::.;".'.'~','-::-" ':.~'l,;:).:L:,... 'u, .~., u.,' ~ .:-.--_.)~-~. . . . , .. \+is+ "'u. .:.:N~~~JJ ST. ~ .' \u, '. T~EA TMEN;T " (,2 C1119'~ : '.O~i:~ j:l r>iC::J u:'t:~.:::.:::.~~~~:o/ S / R~...~2121'" ~~~ ~::: ~:~::~.<:: D.e. 488_477 iS~ -1~cD - __ ll.e.12OJ-652 ~~ @ ("'''' . .1' ~ ''''' ~~ II a ~ ~ .ih<:[<.l!I'" :::~7 ~ "',:;:;,'" I ~ .t, ",,27 ::~: ~r.7Q: 6 5::~"to0tLII b' ,F,' U ~ ~.'i: '-=/ .E~ ATER <'OJ ; ~ 8 " l!. PH!L~~LbONES ,10' ~ ,;~ 11 jJ<~ 13 14 15 '6 17 18 .'6 9 . , ." '["/.}' ::~. Ii r: s = = ~ S ~ ~ . ":- $ RUS5ELL ~~ STREE - ill I \ P '" ~ oOVERLEAr--- <(~6~ll~o'I~1 I H~","~'" ll"'= ~p.--~!\ +- ~9n~ ~~1~4~'~2~ ~ ~; ~ (J) -'-.J ~.....! ,:,:-8- 7- 6~5 - 1 12 3 ill - I 0.'.'''''''' 71 " 1 2 3 \ "" '" ~~,\ :,:.:,~, '\', '::'II,:M ,:;;1", ~it~~~ 4 ~ ~!Z3~PARK ";/'9 15 16 .., P<lC\.. 1. _ _ _ _~IL...!::!~ /300 ~90~. /0001 :1 ~2 ~ ! I ENC ~ STREET 14 ~(-~~- ~ \ ~ ~ ~ " ~~ 1''''' "" m. .. 16 "'10 .... ~ :; ~ "'llp , /221 - 2 ;:: 1 '~ '/~Z; 213 13 "b",. IZ17 2 I/t13~W" ItI8~' ~ -b ~ CURTis I ~ - -@::>;g:3 10 :~:I_ 15 f\\, 12,0:.:>.... ~. 11 12 13 14 17 18 FUNDAMENTAL i 13/04 ~ ~ ~~& 4co 9 I. '1&'114 ~~ ~'1 Il:.-a ~ '0,> 10 ItW I SCHOOL ~ lt05 ~< lla'S! I 8121 16 0.... ~ I I~t ~ rn 61.-.t ~ 7,toO ltO/ 13 ~ 10 ItN '=> 9 8 7 6 3 2 1 \ I"" ~c "" "3 " V ~ i a ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /W LASA ST 0 ~ _ 11/ttJ ; <I lit'! 1 ~. 14"28 1111 11 ;~ 9 10/4 ADMIRAl WOODSON LANE i :::;f ~ IIts 11t1 P;:-- J ~ I, 1m! ~ ::~ 2 I~ t3"tt ~ 10 lOlt lD/1 i .. ~ i i i ~ a @ I ! ~ 1117~ ~ 1t/9 3 12~~~(J ~ W6 ~ B ,/::); 10 11 12 13 14 1~ 16 17 18 I 104- ~ !""~ ~ iii:. fJ 1" '"If ~ ~A l.----;o;'OIO ~~ T l~ "1'1)- J: I""~ ~ 5<=l '-"0 ~. CO" 10" ~ - ~6~~: 110.,'\.8 6 I ~ 11105 ~ nOI 6:;;( 9J1z() '" 0 5 4 3 2 _1101. 7 7 7 ~ 6 ( li'" ~ 51: 1101 ~ 8 70 rtel 5 fa~ 1()(}7 :! .tf"!! ~ ~ ! I i ~ii1ii.:ft CEllAR 6 ",,'\ \ ~ HlBISC\JS I 17 ':': "W 1 12 10'" IQ" I \i' 4 . SlREET IOtO 5 itli! ,oo~ ~ ~ i s 5 fi ~ 2 11 I(J18 1009 ~ 10 i ~ ,::; 3 10 'Olt :: . 7 3 100' ~ d- 11 12 13 14 15 l: ;;r4/~~ 1011 4 9 HJ08 Z 8 ~ .~ 12~669~ __ ~ '(J()()O::~ ~.... I 1000 13/05 ~ 100' 5 18 3 2 1 ~ 1 2 6 5 4 J 2 6' \ I 18RARYc:. lQ4t:;1 ~.N 7 '1: TIi1 50 I ~ 61COD 60l 6 i ~17100~ &0 i ... _ ~ 50 ~ ~ i s i i ~ 9 ; 60 ~ 7 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ " g o--~---- ISt~ ~ :? ! ~ :;:~ ~ 0; 153l 9 8 7 6 I~..c 3 2ci> 1 @I @I,,' 1':'-:' (!) !b @ 10 11 PZk 13 14~J;, 16 'Y7 18 IS19 ~~:!! ~ ~ i::::=] ~ ~~ ~ p..JilY<<J 10> S1REET -~ ~ J ~ ~ 3 5 6 1 ~ 2 ~ 8 ~'I ~ ,- I ~ $ I 13 (~'2 i ~ 11 ~ 10 <:>16 15 ~ ; 14 ~ ~ d Co \; 9@ 8, ~ <:;- J0<:'::z 14 ~ l.~ o '" @7 ,,01 @ 16, @ 18 ~ i ! ~ ! 5 6 '" 7 8 to"" 1~08 16 '5 14 '~ ( ~ 12 ~ 10 9 ~~ ....i ~ ~ ~ LfVlI jl~ H ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ :J...~.,;... 1 2 3 4. "! 6 7 16 '5 14 f}' ~ S.. ~ ~ ~ I::~ I~t I ~ i'~~a~ ~~ 6 ~ 109 "11 12~1 I? ~ ID01i ~ ~ ~ ~l g $ (!rWOOOBINE i ~... S 9() @7 ~~ "'" C." @~ (1) 107~ 12 13.q; 14 15 ':~ ~ ~ e ~ ; ~ ; ~ L-- SPRlNGOALE ~ ~ 'b \~?\ 7 . . E i 8 I ::: ill 9 ~ J: . nl 8 I ~ ~ 5 M 1l 36) 26) '(j 16 ~~ ~ ~ a a ~ ~ 10 12~ :)11 H! S1REET ;;. ,~~ II>\. ~ 1 2}< :5 .. \j:.t5 s ,,,. I ~ ~ ~ i4 13i 12~ "~ 10~ ':'0 ii 7 STREET !I,(D ~ ~ 4 5 6 ~ 17 '9 21 22 20 18 : N "'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ 61 62 6J 64 65 66 ~ ~ ~ 13/03 B :? ~ 15 f\ 16 ~ ~ ~ M. L. KING REC. CENTER ItC! ~ ~ IlII 6!l ... 32\ 5162636405&0 ~ ~ ::: :::: 01 I :::l '0' f- 1042 ~ . I . I ~ 039 3 ".. f- A'" f- 1Oi3A- 10~1 5 ,on O.ll.!20~J" All ()f :,w. l/J ItA. i;;c'I>.'tt,...ds..c..!..... _f~"<5dlUonPlqt ~IKS) ~ ~ Ion 1020 1018 10/6 IOU lOlt '010 '00' "-- 6"", IOt3 i~ I()16 8 OIT 10 CLEARWA TER COMPREHENSIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL ~ 11 000 JlJ 11111 lIs \~ 1&4-1 "2 ~ l' ~I I ;1 ~I ~1 ~T ~I :1 ! ~I ~ ~I t ~ ~ ~ 32 -:b1 :JO -129 -128 '127 -126 ~125 ~124 I 23 'I 22 - 21 -120 - 19- - 18 - T 278B ." ... r\ /II. ?7RA " $ $ I S ,:" ~II 23 I ~ I ; I $ I .., I 23 I ~\ I'" ,';" !'61~ 1 ! 26 ..., 25 "" 24 ,/w, 22 '" 21 u~ '~9 '''. 18 1411 17 1#3 16 1107 15 ~ 14 '~:':'I ~ I 17 16 1 ~ 1316 0 )> ~ . 23/0Z '311 44 43 ~ 42 ! 41 ~ 4 16 15 _ ! ~ 18 ~ c 17 '" 279A 4 CITY OF CLEARWATER AND VICINITY PI!lELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED BV PUBUC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENClNEERING 100 S. Illy tit ~yt., CltOf'Water, FL J3756 Ph.: (727}5Ci2-.f750. fa...: (727)'26-47'5 hUp: / /...w,etetnater- ".tom jCltyJ>eparlments/publle_lIOt'ks/enqlnttr / Dlsdaimer: 1 ! IBOO 3 Public information dQta Is fumlstled by the City of C190rwater Public Works Admirllstration/Engll'ltel'"ln9' (JI'\d must be (Iccept~ ond u"d by the reeipient with the undentOl'ldirl9 that the dola received was cOllected for the pUrpo$e of deVeloping 0 'Topnlc Inn-oslrudure Inventory. As $1JCn, tne City of Cleorwoter PWA!t makes no warrontles. expre!lsed 01" ImpUed, c01lcerl'llng the accuracy. completeness. reliability. or sultobAity af tnl, doto for any otner particular use. furthermore, tn~ City of Clearwater PWA!E assumes 1'10 lioblllty whatsoever assoclate<! .Iln the use or moose of $1Jeh data ,... 2 161t 4 ,... 5 Will; This A.tlos page Is S1Jbject to periodic ch01lges. For fnformaUOfI about latnt revrslOfl' plene call PWA!E or visit (tUr Web sileo . ,- 6 " 7 ,~" 8 '" UI8 10 EB Ult 11 100 200 400 600 ., , I SCALE: ," 400' U08 12 13 . ! LEGEND: @ BLOCK NUMBER 1234 lOT ADDRESS CITY LIMITS LINE ~ ~ 1"'7..."'1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY ...:.:..... OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS . AGREEMENT TO ANNEX . CITY OWNED PROPERTY M D R ZONING DESIGNATION - ZONE LINE ~11 . 13 .ANNEX ORO CD 4122 2/05/86 CD 4140 3/06/86 Q) U:M 3/19/87 @ H07 8/20/17 @ ....10 10/1 ~/87 @ Hi9 II/~/a7 <!> "'!l.f6 J/03!U @ 4580 S/19/88 @ 4!5816/02IM G 5238 1/13/92 @ ~4J 8/18/94 6} 5734 1/19 9~ {) $8457/20/95 o 5864 a/OJ/Qs 658611/111" 19 i ! 16 ~ 9 ~s 10/0~/9~ o 581S 10/19/95 @ !l9&!I 3/21/96 4} !l9873/21/96 @ 600i 4/1I,19t) ~ 6020 5/15/96 @ 6024 B/OIi/95 @ 61527/17/97 S 6248 4/03/98 @ 6JI39/03/98 @ 6340 11/19/98 4) 1317 0}/05/99 @ 651005/04/00 @ 6~2 06/01/00 o ana 05/04/01 @ ee8!!i 12/13/01 Q) 104!1 01/23/03 e REZONE ORC l!l 46538/18/88 III !!i7642/16/95 rn 605!!i 8/0l/H REVISED: 03/06/2003 ZONING ATLAS 269B NE 1/4 OF SECTION 10 - 29 S - 15 E Pin~las County Property APPler Information: 1029 156904800501 Page 2 of5 10 / 29 / 15 / 69048 / 005 / 0150 06-0ct-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:03:41 Ownership InforMation Non-Residential Property Add ress. Use. and Sales EUERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC 1211 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755-3306 COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1211 N BETTY LN of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t: 263.00 sales froM 2001 - 2002: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMP Plat InforMation 12/2.002 12.439/1. 759 130.000 (U) I 1946 : Book 023 Pgs 071- 12/1.981 5.282/2.219 105.000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 11. 970 3.348/ 535 3.500 (U) I 0000 : Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2003 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 104.500 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % 1.000 Historic : 0 Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 104.500 Tax ExeMpt %: 1.000 Other ExeMp t : 104.500 Taxable: 0 Agricultural: 0 2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 03 Millage: 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: 1.900.55 1) 75 x 158 2.00 11.850.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2003 taxes wi 11 be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 .00 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 23.700 2003 taxes will be : 2.412.39 Short Legal PINE BROOK UNIT NO. 2 B LK E. LOT 15 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?0=1 &a=1 &b=l&c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t=1 &u=O&p... 10/612003 . Pin~llas County Property APPler Information: 1029 156904800501 Page 3 of5 10 / 29 / 15 / 69048 / 005 / 0150 :01 06-0ct-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:03:41 COMMercial Card 01 of 1 IMproveMent Type: Pre-Engineered Hetal Property Address: 1211 N BETTV LN Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 75 Structural Elements Foundation Floor SysteM Exterior Wall Height Factor Party Wall Structural FraMe Roof FraMe Roof Cover Cabinet & Mill Floor Finish Interior Finish Partition Factor Spread/Hono Footing Slab Above Grade Prefinished Hetal o None Rigid FraMe Steel Truss & Purlin Corrugated Hetal None Concrete Finish None o Heating & Air None Fixtures Bath Tile Electric Shape Factor Quality Year Built Effective Age Other Depreciation Function Depreciation EconoMic Depreciation 2 None Ave rage Rectangle Average 1. 970 20 o o o Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 4.450 7) .00 0 2) Office Area 1. 75 500 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .20 125 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 50X50 1. 00 2.500 0 2.500 999 2) AIR CONO 50X89 2.00 4.450 0 6.590 1.990 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 9.090 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[I][fJ~~ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b= 1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t= l&u=O&p... 10/6/2003 Pinel~as County Property APp.r Information: 1029 1569048005 O. Page 2 of5 10 / 29 / 15 / 69048 / 005 / 0160 06-0ct-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:04:Z1 Ownership InforMation Uacant Propert~ Use and Sales HOMELESS EMERGENCV PROJECT l1Z0 N BETTV LN CLEARWATER FL 33755-3303 COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Tract: Z63.00 sales froM 2001 - 2002: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMp Plat InforMation 1 /1. 996 9. HZ/ 8ZZ 78.600 (Q) I 1946 : Book OZ3 Pgs 071- 6 /1. 987 6.510/1.7OZ 147.400 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 4 /1. 984 5.740/1. U8 94.000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1.97Z 3.715/ 474 5.000 (Q) U 2003 Value EXEMPTIONS Jus t / Marke t: Z9.800 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % 1.000 Historic : 0 Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: Z9.800 Tax ExeMpt %: 1.000 Other ExeMp t : Z9.800 Taxable: 0 Agricultural: 0 2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation D is t r ic t: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 03 Mi llage : Z3.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 02 Taxes: .00 1) 119 x 13Z Z.OO 15.708.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2003 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 .00 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 31.416 2003 taxes will be : 687.94 Short Legal PINE BROOK UNIT NO. Z BLK L LOT 16 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/6/2003 Pinel~as County Property APp.r Information: 10 29 15 69048 005 o. Page 3 of5 10 / 29 / 15 / 69048 / 005 / 0160 06-0ct-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 11:04:ZZ Vacant Extra Features Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 1. 00 3.600 0 3.600 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VA LU E : 3.600 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ~~[t][f]~~ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o=1 &a=l &b= 1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/612003 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 16, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests: NOTE: All persons wishinl!: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!:. Those cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neil!:hborinl!: property owners. etc. will be placed on a consent al!:enda and approved bv a sinl!:le vote at the bel!:inninl!: of the meetinl!:. 1. (cont. from 10/21/03) Robert Hupp & Allen McMullen are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction in the front (north) setback from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and from 35 ft to 16 ft (to generator pad) along Charles Avenue, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 98 spaces (5/1,000 sq ft) to 97 spaces (4.9/1,000 sq ft), an increase in building height from 30 ft to 38.5 ft, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.C and to vacate 242 feet of Allen Avenue right of way (Proposed Use: A 9,560 sq ft medical clinic.) at 3080 Allen Avenue., Acker's Sub, Blk 4, Lots 4-7 & 12- 15, part of Lots 8-11. FLD2003-08037 2. Griffin International Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages on a parcel of land contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residentially zoned property in the Zoning Atlas, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Alcoholic beverage sales within a 2,100 square-foot tenant space located in an existing shopping center) at 1575 S. Hil!:hland Ave., Sec. 23-29-15, M&B 34.31. FLD2003-09042 3. G T Leisure Corp. / ROl!:ers Beach Development (Villa del Sole of Clearwater Beach, LLC) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit 6 attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pool and decking) and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for 6 lots [Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings (townhomes)] at 181 Bril!:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 20 & 21 and riparian rights. FLD2003- 09046 4. Island Kev Development. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval for a multi-use dock for the construction/reconstruction of 11 slips, dock and 4 catwalks with boardwalk along the seawall for a residential condominium complex, with a reduction of the side (north and south) setbacks from 18 ft to 16 ft (to catwalks) and from 18 ft to zero ft (to boardwalk) and an increase of the width of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (135 ft) to 100 percent of the lot width (180 ft), under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock of 11 slips for Island Key Condominiums) at 692 Bavwav Blvd N., Bayside Sub. No.5, Blk A, Lots 21, 22 & 23 and riparian rights. FLD2003-09044 5. BelCal Properties. LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (GTE Federal Credit Union), in addition to a proposed distribution center and offices) at 1750 N. Belcher Rd., Clearwater Industrial Park, a part of Lot 12. FLD2003-09047 6. Evervbodv's Tabernacle. Inc. & Homeless Emerl!:encv Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 ft to 17 ft (to stairway ramping) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 ft to 15 ft (to stairwell) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2- 704.B] (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 8 unitslbeds) at 1215 & 1211 N. Betty Ln., Pinebrook Sub. No.2, Blk E, Lots 15 & 16. FLD2003-09048 . . .. 7. Homeless Emerl!:encv Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter of 4 beds with a reduction of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4.46 ft (to pavement), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction of the side (west) landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter) at 1003 Carlton St., C.E. Jackson's Sub., Blk 3, Lot 11 less rd. FLD2003-09049 8. Moorinl!: Capital Fund. LLC (Family Resources, Inc.) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter (16 beds for youth in crisis) and a social/public service agency in the Institutional District with a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 9.5 ft (to pavement), a deviation to allow the residential shelter 900 ft (instead of 600 ft) from a transit line and a deviation to allow a social/public service agency adjacent to residentially zoned property, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204.A, and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the side (west) property line from 12 ft to 9.5 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter (16 beds) and a social/public service agency) at 1615 Union St., Sec. 02-29-15, M&B 12.05. FLD2003- 09051 9. Elias Anastopoulos is requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 2 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to ramp), from 10 ft to 1 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 3 ft (to rubber matting), a reduction ofrequired parking from 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (38 spaces) to 3.19 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from 5 ft to 2 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 7,610 sq-ft retail sales and services building) at 700 S. Gulfview Blvd., Bayside Shores, Blk C, Lots 11 & 12 and Bayside Sub. No.6 Unit B, Elk E, Lot 13 and 15 ft vac rd on S. FLD2003-09045 10. ABR Plymouth Plaza. Ltd. (Tampa Bay Water/Jerry L. Maxwell, GM) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit an office building with an increase of building height from 30 ft to 55 ft and a reduction of the side (east) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1004.F. (Proposed Use: 37,000 sq ft three-story office building) at 2575 Enterprise Rd., Sec. 30-28-16, M&B 34.11. FLD2003-09053 11. South Gate Park. Inc. (Tree Tops at Druid) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the side (west) setback from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), an increase of building height to allow perimeter parapets an additional 6 ft (from roof deck) and a deviation from the requirement to screen off-street parking from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304.G, and Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 units, five per building)] at 2525 Druid Rd., Sec. 18-29-16, M&B 44.41 and Sever Park, Lot 3 less E 200 ft. FLD2003-08038 12. Dean C. & Anita J. Carlev are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Residential deck) at 1601 Sand Kev Estates Ct., The Moorings of Sand Key, Lot 30. FLD2003-09043 13. Michael & Stefanie Markham are requesting an appeal of the decision ofa Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft for a two-story addition to an existing single family dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038) (Owners: Jeffrev A. & Ambrvn E. Finstad) at 2959 Eal!:le Estates Cir. W., Eagle Estates, Lot 38. APP2003-00003 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to . . .. three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093. Ad: 11/30/03 c:. -J . STAGG, JAMES E 704 14TH AVE NW LARGO FL 33770 - 1128 · EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC C/O HOMELESS EMERGENCY PRO 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 TINSLEY, JAMES S 1408 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2607 DOYLE, EVELYN M 1325 LOTUS DR N DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5410 DOYLE, EVELYN M 1325 LOTUS DR N DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5410 DOYLE, EVELYN M 1325 LOTUS DR N DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5410 EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC INC INC 1120 N BETTY LN 1120 N BETTY LN 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 DILLARD, GEORGE BLUNT, ALICE HOMELESS EMERGENCY MOONEY, LUCRETIA A BLUNT, DERICK E PROJECT 1525 STEVENSON DR 1201 FAIRBURN AVE 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2648 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3321 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE PUGH, HENRIETTA W EV ANS, LONNIE J INC 1208 FAIRBURN AVE EVANS, CASTELLA E 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3320 1214 FAIRBURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3320 MC ABEE, DAVID RICHARDSON, SHERI C BAKER, GREGORY MC ABEE, PATRICIA JONES, ESSIE M BAKER, CHERYL R 1204 FAIRBURN AVE 1124 FAIRBURN AVE 1116 FAIRBURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3320 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3318 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3318 EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC INC INC 1120 N BETTY LN 1120 N BETTY LN 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE HENRION, JOYCEE P INC INC 1009 PINEBROOK DR 1120 N BETTY LN 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3434 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 MARTIN, TROY A PARENTE, JEFF CLEARWATER, CITY OF 1011 PINEBROOK DR 1349 ADMIRAL WOODSON LN ATTN: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3434 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3402 PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATERFL 33758 - 4748 BERT, ROBERT H JR KING, CARTER E DOUGLAS, JAMES G BERT, PAMELA M KING, MARGARET VANPELT, TIMOTHY J 1354 ADMIRAL WOODSON LN 1350 ADMIRAL WOODSON LN 7924 DAY ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3442 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3401 SUNLAND CA 91040 - 3310 .. WENNER, STEVEN 1019 PINE BROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - THOMAS, CALVIN E WATTS, BARBARA 1012 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 KIRTLEY, JAMES L KIRTLEY, CAROL 1018 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 DODSON, GOLDIE G 1024 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 WHITE, JENNIFER D 1101 NBETTYLN CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3304 CARTER, W MILES TRE 1115NBETTYLN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3304 SERGEANT ALLEN MOORE COMMUNITY PTNSHP, INC 1201 NBETTYLN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3306 HOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJECT 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 GHOLAMPOUR, BEHNAM 1427 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2608 CRABTREE, RICHARD CRABTREE, BENTE 1316 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3422 - CARPENTER, DONALD C CARPENTER, CONNIE J 1008 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 WHARRAN, WILLIAM WHARRAN, LYNN 1014 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 GENDUSA, SAMUEL J 1020 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 WEST, FLORENCE E 4750 WOODARD WAY # G7 LIVERPOOL NY 13088 - 4663 BULLOCK, EL VENA 1107 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3304 DIMAS, WILLIAM C 1117 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3304 SERGEANT ALLEN MOORE COMMUNITY PTNSHP INC 1201 N BETTY LN CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3306 MOSLEY, JANICE M HILLMAN, DARRYL L 1317 SPRINGDALE ST CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 2741 MESAGNO, BRUCE 10514 100TH ST LARGO FL 33773 - 4548 WILLIAMS, LOVETT A B BRYANT, WILLIE R 1201 STONEY BROOK LN DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4825 -BRADLEY, TERRY A BRADLEY, KAREN T 1010 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 LUDEKER,CATHERINE 1016 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3432 PATELLA, RONALD PATELLA, ELIZABETH M 1022 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3432 OLSA, MICHAEL R 1028 PINEBROOK DR CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3432 CARTER, W MILES TRE 1115NBETTYLN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER, CITY OF 112 S OSCEOLA AVE PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 EVERYBODY'S TABERNACLE INC 1211 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3306 DANKAS INVESTMENT CL WR INC 6537 SEAFAlRER DR TAMPA FL 33615 - 2500 ROMAN, REYES 1312 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - SIERRA, FRANCISCO SIERRA, MARISOL 1324 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3422 . . URSCHEL, VICTORIA J 1330 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATERFL 33755- STOFFLET,FRANCES 1327 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 3423 DE BUSK, PEGGY A 1315 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 MATAMOROS, JORGE A 1504 STEVENSONS DR CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 2646 . ANDRASEK, BRIAN J ANDRASEK, CATHY H 1333 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 BOONE, JAMES D BOONE, ROBIN 1321 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 RICHEY, PAT F 1309 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 DIEN & COWART ENTRP INC 1305 WOODBINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2747 · SMITH, TAMMY A SMITH, MARGARET R 1329 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 PORTALA, SARAHJ 1317 OVERLEA ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3423 FLOYD, THOMAS SR FLOYD, ELIZABETH 0 1471 FAIRMONT ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2753 Ms. Barbara Green 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 " CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 December 18, 2003 Ms. Barbara Green Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 North Betty Lane Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-09048 - 1211-1215 North Betty Lane Dear Ms. Green: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit a residential shelter of eight units/beds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 17 feet (to stairway ramping) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 704.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) [which permitted a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 North Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2- 704.B]. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.I.]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" ~ December 18, 2003 Green - Page Two Conditions of Approval: 1. * That any change in ownership on Site A (retail thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and may require approval by the Community Development Board (CDB); 2. * That the landscape plan for Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the northeast comer of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits for Site C improvements; 3.* That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards; 4. * That the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City staff prior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings; 5. * That all signage meet Code, including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site; 6. That a Unity of Title be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the southern building; 7. That each residential shelter building be for a maximum of eight units/beds; 8. That, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building, the site plan be revised to relocate the southern handicap parking space to the west end of the parking row to meet accessibility requirements; 9. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of a building permit for the southern building to ensure compliance with the landscape provisions of the Code for tree types and to resolve conflicts of landscaping with the proposed southern building and/or parking area; and 10. That all proposed on-site utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, be located underground. (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09A) Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (December 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. ') December 18, 2003 Green - Page Three In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 1, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727- 562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myc1earwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Planning Director Cc: Mr. Michael Reineke, Wade-Trim \ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next CDBlBetty N 1211 - 1215 Homeless Emergency Project (C) (CIRP - res. shelter)IBetty N 121/ - 1215 Development Order. doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEERING REPORT IN SUPPORT OF A SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT STANDARD GENERAL PERMIT FOR MINOR SYSTEMS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAINAGE CONNECTION FOR: HOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJECT RESIDENTIAL SHELTER II SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 29 E, RANGE 15 E PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA November 5,2003 SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # h-9 U>03-0" 0 ~~ CASE TYPE c.\~, ORe DATE \01 ~o lo'3- CDS DATE l"Lh"~ SIGNATURE ,~o.-. DATE~ 1\07 rI ":; .' + -....., .~. ~"""'~ ~ ~ ~ .~.- . ~""". N(1\j () I~ LUU3 Michael E. Rice, P .E. FL PE #23970 , ~'V \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS LOCATION MAP I INTRODUCTION 2 DESIGN CRITERIA 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2 CONCLUSION 3 APPENDICIES: Appendix I Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 SCS Soil Survey Information Pond Volume Calculations Modret Draw-down Analysis Proof of Ownership Geotechnical Report FIGURES: Figure I Figure 2 FEMA Flood Map SCS Soil Map I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INTRODUCTION It is the intent of Homeless Emergency Project, Inc to add on to their existing Residential Shelter site 1215 North Betty Lane, Clearwater Florida. This location, Residential Shelter II, is approximately 0.272 acres in size and located on south of the existing property at 1211 North Betty Lane, just south of Stevensons Creek. It is HEP's hope to redevelop this area into an additional eight unit residential shelter for the homeless. The combination of these two lots will constitute a gross site area of 0.272-acres + 0.35- acres for a total of 0.622-acres. According the FEMA Flood maps, the site is in flood zone AE, elevation 11, per Panel Number 125096 0008 D dated August 19, 1991, see Figure 1. According the latest flood study done by Parsons Engineering Sciences, Inc for the City of Clearwater and provided to us by Mr. Bob Marin of the City of Clearwater the 1 DO-year flood elevation for Stevenson Creek at the proposed project location is 8.5 (NGVD), see Figure 3 for Flood Profile map). DESIGN CRITERIA METHOD: Modified Rational Method TREATMENT: Dry Detention Pond WATER QUALITY: 0.5 inches over the gross site area, 1,199 c.f. which will recover in approximately 26-hours, see Appendix 3 for Modret drawdown calculations WATER QUANTITY: Not Applicable TAl LWATER CONDITIONS: Stevensons Creek Mean High Tide Elevation 1.3 ft NGVD DOWNSTREAM BOUNDARY: Stevensons Creek - Tidally Influenced waterway FLOOD PLAIN MITIGATION: No flood plain mitigation is proposed due to Tidal Flood conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS "Residential II" is approximately 0.272 acres in size and currently has a 4,983 square foot building on it with associated overhangs, patios and asphalt areas. Stormwater in the current condition sheet flows into Stevensons Creek with no previsions for water quality or quantity. Soils on the site consist of Urban Land-Myakka complex (UM), see Figure 2 for SCS Soils Map, Appendix 1 for SCS soil data and Appendix 5 for geotechnical report. Lastly, the site currently has no SWFWMD or City of Clearwater drainage permits in place. PROPOSED CONDITIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The proposed condition includes the construction of an 8-unit residential shelter along with its accompanying asphalt drive, parking and dry detention pond for water quality. The proposed construction will be an addition to the 8-unit residential shelter currently being constructed on the adjacent northerly lot. The site stormwater system will be designed to encompass both SWFWMD and City of Clearwater criteria. The detention pond will provide 1,199 c.f. of treatment volume at the DHW elevation as needed for 0.5 inches of rainfall over the gross site area. In addition the pond will maintain 0.5 foot of free-board during a design storm event, see Appendix 2 for pond volume calculations. The SHW elevation for the site is tidally driven. The Mean High Tide per the nearest tidal station at the mouth of Stevensons Creek is 1.3 NGVD 29 with Low Tide at elevation -0.7 NGVD 29. Given this data we have established a SHW elevation of 3.09 for pond, this was done by interpolating between the SHW elevation at DRI-3, see geotechnical report in Appendix 5, and the mean high tide elevation. A seasonal high water elevation of 3.5 was used throughout this report to be conservative. CONCLUSION The storm water management systems will be reviewed by the Southwest Florida Water Management District and City of Clearwater. The stormwater management system will be designed to meet the design criteria of both review agencies and have no adverse impacts to the surrounding environment. P:\Zzz2272\05m\Docs\GovtSvcs\SWFWMD drainage report Res II 9-22-03.doc I PINELLAS COUNTY, FLOlUDA 23 I I I I I ~. ~ I , r a . - - I: . . I . I t I; ~ ji" any mapped area. (No capability or 'woodland classifica- tion) . Urban land-M akka com lex Um .~About 30 to 50 percen 0 t comp ex IS ya a e sand, of which 15 to 30 percent has been modified by cutting, grading, and shaping. About 25 to 40 percent of this complex. is Urban land that is covered with houses, industrial build- ings, other structures, and pavement. Spoil materials froUl drainage canals and from street excavations have been used to fill low areas or spread on the surface of other soils. Included in mapping are small areas of Adamsville, As tatul a, and lmmokalee soils that make up no more . than 15 percent of any mapped area. Small areas o~ Made land and small a.reas more than 75 percent of which are covered with urban facilities also are included. (No cap!l-bility or 'Woodland classification) Urban land.Pomello complex (Up).-About 25 to 55 percent of this complex is Pomello soils, of which 10 to 25 percent has been modified by cutting, grading, and shaping. About 25 to 40 percent of this comJ?lex is Urban land. that is covered WIth houses, industrial buildings, .other structures, and pavement. Spoil material 'from gr8.dipg and leveling operations has been used to fill low ateas or has been spread over the surface of other soils. Included in mapping are small areas of .A.statula fine sand, Iinmokalee fine sand, and Myakka fine sand that make up ~o more than 15 percent of any mapped area. AB much as 75 percent .of a few small areas is covered :with structures and pavement. (No capability or wood- land c1~sificlttion) . Urban land.Wabasso complex (Uw).-About35 to 55 percent' of this compl~:Jc is Wabasso fine sand, of which 10 to 30 'percent has been modified by cutting, grading, Bud shapmg. About 25 to 40 percent of this complex is Urban land that is covered with houses, industrial build- ings, other. .structures, and .pavemen,t. Spoil material from dra.inage can~ and from.streetgrlUiing has been . used to fill low areas or has b,een !l'prelld dIi the surface . of other SGils_ Included in mapping ar,e areas of Oldsmax fine. sand that make up as much aa ffl:. percent. ,of. some mapped areas, and small areILS of Pirrellas' fi1)~' ~and and Elred fine 'sand .thltt m~e ll;P abou~ 5. percent. (No capability or woodhnd classificatIOn) , WabassoSeries The' 'Wabasso series consists of nearly level, poorly drained sandy soils' that formed in beds of sandy and loamy marine' sediments. These soils are on broad low rid~es in the flatwoods. . . . Typicapy, the surfaqe ~ayer is black fine sand about 5 mches thick. Bel<;>w this IS gray, loose, leached fine sand about 22. inches thiCk. It has a few vertical streaks of , very dark 'grlty along root channels. The. next laler is black, weakly cemented, very friable fine sand 5 mches thick. Next, is dark-brown, very friable fine sand that contains fra~ents of black, weakly cemented fine sand. This is underlain by dark grayish-brown fine sandy clay loam mot.tle,d :with olive brown; it is about 6 inches thick. Below this IS coarsely mottled dark-brown, olive-brown, and grayish-brown fine sandy loam a.bout 6 inches thick. Light-gray sand mixed with sheH fragments is between I' f 1:'- I' t - .l depths of about 50 inches and 62 inches. Reaction is very strongly acid to a depth of about 27 inches, slightly aoid between 21 and 32 inches, medium acid between 32 and 38 inches, slightly acid between 38 and 50. ipches, and mildly alkaline below this depth. The water table normally is at a depth of about 25 mches. . Wa~asso soils have low available water c.apacity, low orgl!-mc~matt~r content, and low: natural fertility. Perme- abIhty IS rapId to a depth of 27 mches, moderate between 27 and 50 inches, and rapid below this depth. . Representative profile of Wabasso fine sand: A1-0 to 5 incheS, black (10YR 2/1) fine sand; weak, fine, crumb structure; very friable; mixture of organic matter and light-gray sand grains; many fine and medium rootsj very strongly acid; gradual, smooth boundary. A2-5 to 27 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) fine sand; single grain; loose; few fine and medium roots; few vertical streaks of very dark gray along root channels; very strongly acidj clear, smooth boundary . B2h-27 to 32 inches, black (5YR 2/1) fine sand; massive; firm; weakly cemented crushes 6'll8Uy with slight pressure; sand grains well coated with organic matter; many fine and medium roots; few gray streaks along root channels; slightly acid; clear, smooth boundary. B3 &; Bh-32 to' 38 inches, dark-brown (7.5YR 3/2) fine sand; weak, fine, crumb structure; very friable; most sand grains coated with organic matter; common fine roots; weakly cementedj common fragments of black (5YR 2/1) aloJ;lg root channels; medium acid; gradual, smooth boundary. B'21t-38 to 44 inches, dark grayish-brown (lOYR 4/2) fine . sandy clay loam; common, medium and coarse,. dis- tinct, olive-brown (2.5Y 4/4) mottles; moderate, medi- um, sub angular blocky structure; firm; many flne and medium rootsj sand grains are bridged and coated with clay; slightly acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. B'22~ to 50 inches, coarsely mottled, dark-brown (10YR 3/3), olive-brown (2.51" 4/4), and grayish-brown (2.5Y 5/2) fine .sandy loamj weak, moderate, subangular blocky structure; slightly sticky; common fine roots; sand grains are bridged and coated with cla)'; slightly . acid; clear; wavy boundary. . 110--50 to 62 inches, light-gray (2.5Y 7{2) sand and shell fragments; single grain; loosej mildly alkalinej calcareous. .' . The Al horizon ranges from dark gray to blaCk and is 4 to 7 inches thick. The A2 horizon is gray to light-gray sand or fine sand and is 10 to 23 inches thick. Depth. to the B2h horizon is .20 to ao inches. This horizon, is dark reddish-brown, dark-brown, or' black sand or fine sand and is 4 to 12 inohes.thick, The Bh horizon ranges from slightly acid to very strongly aoid. In many plal}es a B3. &; Bh horizon, 4 to 6 inches thiok,is below the Bh. hOrizon. It IS dark-brown to dark grayish-brown sand and has . black weakly cemented nodules of sand scattered' through it. The B'2t horizon occurs at depths of 29 to 40 inches. It is gray to dark grayish-brown and brownish-yellow sandy loam or sandr clay loam and is mottled with gray, olive, olive brown, graYIsh brown, brownish yellow, and strong brown. The lower part of the B'2t horizon is more strongly mottled and, in places, contaiJ1s carbonate along root channels and light-gray to white secondary ol).rbonate material. The B't horizon ranges from medium acid t(j mildly alkaline. A lIO horizon of gray sand mixed with shell fragments occurs below the B'2t horif.;on, oom- monly within a deptl,1 of 60 inches. III places the lIO horizon is as much as 15 feet thick. The water table is within a depth of 10 . inches for' 1 or 2 months during wet seasons. The rest of the year it is at a depth of 10 to 40.inches. 'I'he Wabasso soils mapped in Pinellas County have a B horizQn that is less acid than the range defined for the series. This differenoe does not appreciably affect use or management. Wabasso soils are associated with Astor, Elred, Felda, Mana- t.ee, Myakka., Oldsmar, and Pompano soils. They are not so poorly drained as Astor, Pompano, and Manatee soils. They have a Bh'horizon that is lacking in Elred, Felda, And Pompano soils. They have a loamy Bt horizon that is lacking in M)'akka ", 38 I- I I I' -I;' Adamsville: Ad__u____n Once in 20. to 50. years for 2 to 7 days. r I I I j ., Charlotte: Ch__,.~------- Every year for 1 to 6 months_n_ Less than 15 inches for 2 to 6 ~ months. Coastal beaches: Co______ Varies with tide__n___________ Varies with tide_____nn___n_ I Elred: I ~ I , _ Fellowship: \ Immokalee: I J ' I Manatee: , I: Myakka: :. I Okeeohobee: OL.._______ Every year fOr 6 to 12 months__ Less than, 10. inohes for 6 to 12 .., Pld,smar: Om____.__:____ Once in 5 to 20. years for'; to Le:o:~'ID inches for 1 or 2 3D days. months. I Soil name and mapping unit symbol Flood hazard SOIL SURVEY Depth to seasonal high water .. . table Less than 10. inches for 1 or 2 . months. Astatula: Af8__________n_______ None_____n___nnn__n____ More than So. inches all yearn__ AfC_______ ___n -- n_ - - None_ - _ __h__ n_ n____ ______ More than So. inches all yeaL_n As___________n___n__ Nonen ____n_nn_n____.n- From 40. to 60. inches for 6 to 12 months. Astor: At_______n___________ Every year for 6 months or more. Av___un_n__u__u__ Every year for 6 months or more. Ed_.____n_ _un_ _ Once in 5 to 20. years for 1 to' 3D days. ,Felda: Fd___uun_n____n__ Once in 5 to 20. years for 7 to 3D days. Less ,than 10. inches for 6 months or more. Less than 10. inches for 6 months or more. . Less than 10. inohes for 1 or 2 months. Less than 10. inches for 2 to 6 months. Fe__h____n___u___n Every year for 1 to 6months___ Less than 10. inches for 6 to 12 months. ' Fh'J~___nn_ None___u_______u___u_____ Less than 10' inches for 1 or 2 months. Im__________ Once in 5 to 20. years for 7 to 3D days. . Made land: Ma, Md. No valid estimates oan be made. Less than 10. inohes for 1 or2 mont~. Mnu_________ Every year for 1 to 6 months____ Less than 10. inches for 6 to 12 months. M>:,___________ Once in 5 to 20. years for 7 to 3D days. ,.. I Orland1>: Or___________n On!)e in 5 to 20. years for 7 to ~ .J 80. days. Less than 10. inches for 1 to 4 months. Less than 10. inohes for 1 or 2 months. I' ~ .1 See footnotes at end ot table. Palm Beach: Pa_________ None________u____________n From 40. to 60. inches for 6 to 12 months. Ir ~r.J TABLE 5.-Estimated engineering [Absence of data means Depth from surface ()""'26 26-80 (1) (1) 0.-30. 30-35 35-62 0.-30. 30-41 41-60 ()""'26 26-3S 38~62 ()""'ll 11-23 23-70. 0-36 36-50. 5()""'8D 0-18 18-44 44-72 0-16 .16-25 25-84 0-26 26-55 0-34 34-44 44-65 0-16 16-SD ().....SD Classification USDA Inche~ 0-80. Fine sand_ __ h _n _ _ _ _ __ D-SD o-SD D-SD Fine sand_ __ __n__ n _ __ Fine sand______________ Fine sand__ _ _ __n _n_ _" Fine sandn _ _ n___n___ Fine sand. _ ___ _ __ _ __ u__ Fine sand_ _ _ _un __'____ 0-80. Fin,e sand_:.. _ _ _. _ _ n _ ___ Fine sand, sheIL_h_n__ Finesandn n _ _ _ _ n _ n_ Fine.sandy loam_ _ _ _ _ ___ Sand, sheIL_n_u__n_u Fine sand_ n _ ___ ___ _ ___ Fine sandy loam, loumy fine sand. Shell, sand_un _ n _ _ n __ Fine sand_u______un_ Fine sandy loam, loamy fine sand. Shell"__________________ Loamy fine sand__ u _ ___ Silty o1ay___n____u____ cnay_________~_________ Fine sand__ ~ _n___ _____ Fine sand_ _.. ___ _ _n.__ Fine sand_ u _ n_ Un _ __ Loamy fine sand_ _ _ _ ____ Fine sandy loam'_ _ _ _ _ _ __ Fine' sand_ __ u__ _ _ _ _ ___ Fine sand.. _ n__ _ _ _ n__ Fine sand_ _ _ u _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Fine sandnu_____nn_ Muck__________________ Peat___________________ Fine sand. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ _ _ Fine sandu n___. n __ '__ Fine sandyloamu _ _. ___ Fine sand. _ _ _. n n_ __u Fine s~nd-'_ _ _ h _ _ _'_ . n_ Sand, sheIL___________" I r I ~ ~ I~ I 'I ~ 1 , I 11 ! PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 39 properties oj the soils no estimates were made] Classi fi cation-Con tin ued Percentage Percentage passing sieve- of coarse Available fragments Permeability water . Reaction Shrink-swell .. more than 3 No.4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200 capacity potential Unified AASHO inches in (4.7 (2.0 (0.42 (0.074 diameter mm.) mm.) mm.) mm.) In.lh.r. In.fln. of loll pH SP, Sp-SM A-3 0 100 100 95-100 3-12 >20 <0.05 4. 5-5. 5 Low. SP A-3 . 0 100 100 90-99 1-5 >20 <0.05 4. 5-6. 0 Low. SP A-3 0 100 100 90-99 1-5 >20 <0.05 4. 5-6. 0 Low. SP-SM, SP A-3 0 100 100 85-99 2-12 >20 <0.05 4. 5-6. 0 Low. Sp"-SM A-2 0 100 100 90-99 5-12 6.3"-20.0 >0.20 5. 6-6. 5 Low. SP A-3 0 100 100 90-99 2-5 6.3-20.0 <0.05 6. 1-7. 8 Low. SP,SM A-2 or A-3 0 100 100 85-99 5-12 (I) (I) (I) Variable. SP-SM, .SP A-3 0 100 100 75-98 2-12 >20 <0.05 5.6-8.4 Low. -------------- ------------ (I) (I) (I) (1) (1) >20 <0.05 ---------- Low. SP . A-3 0 100 100 90-99 1-5 6.3-20.0 0.05 5. 6-7. 8 Low. SC,SM A-2-6 , 0 100 100 90-99 12-30 0.63-2.0 O. 10-0. 15 6. 6-7. 3 Low. A-2-4 OP, SP 4-3 5-10 40-80 35-70 30-65 1-5 6.3-20.0 <0.05 6.1-7.8 Low. .BP A-3 0 100 100 90-99 2-5 6. 3-20. 0 <0.05 5.1-7.3 Low. BM-se, se A-2 0 100 100 90-99 15-35 0.63-2.0 O. 10-0. 15 6. 1-7. 8 Low. OP-sP A-3 5-10 40-'70 35-65 30-60 1-5 6. 3-20. 0 <0.05 7. 9-8. 4 Low. SP A-3 0 100 100 90-99 2-5 6.3-20.0 <0.05 5. 1-7. 3 Low. 8M-Se, se A-2-4 0 100 100 90-99 15-35 O. 63-2. 0 O. 10-0. 15 6.1-7.8 Low. OP A-3 5-10 40-70 35-65 30-60 1"':5 6. 3-20. 0 <0.05 7.9-8.4 Low; SP-SlIf A-2 0 100 100 90-99 5-12 O. 63-2. 0 0.05-0.10 4. 5-5; 5 Low. CL, eH, se A-6, A-7 0 100 100 .90-99 40-60 0.06-0.20 O. 10-0. 15 4. 5-5. 5 High. . eL, CH~ se A-6, A-7 0 100 100 95-99 40-85 <0.06 O. 10-0. 15 5.1-6.0 High. BP . A-3 0 100 100 80-100 2-10 6.3-20.0 <0.05 4. 5-5. 5 Low. BP-SM, S:M A-3, A-2 0 100 100 80-100 5-20 O. 63-6. 3 O. 10-0. 15 4. 5-5. 5 Low. SP . A-3 0 100 100 80":100 2-10 6.3-20.0 <0.05 4. 5-5. 5 Low. SP-SM A-2 0 100 100 90-99 5-12 2. 0-6. 3 >o~ 20 6. 1-7. 8 Low. . SO, So..SM A-2-4 0 100 100 90-99 15-35 O. 63-2. 0 O. 10-0. 15 6. 1-7. 8 Low. SP A-3 0 100 100 90-99 2-5 6. 3-20. 0 <0.05 6. 1-7. 8 Low. SP, SP-SM A-3 ~;1vJ,4g 100 100 80-100 2-10 6.3-20. 0 <0.05 4. 5-6. 5 Low. SP-Sl\1, 8M A-3 100 100 80-100 5-20 O. 63-2. 0 O. 10-0. 15 4. 5-6. 5 Low. 8P-Sl\lj SP A-3 100 100 80-100 2-Hi 6. 3-20. 0 <0.05 4. 5-6. 5 Low. pt ------------ 0 -------- .------- -------- -..------ 6.3-:20.0 >0.20 5. 6-'8. 4 High. ' Pt ------------ 0 -------- -------- -------- -------- 6.3-20.0 >0.20 5. 6-8. 4 High.' SP '. A-3 0 100 100 90-99 2-5 6.3-20.0 <0.05 4. 5-5. 5 Low. . SP-8M, 8M A-3 0 100 100 90-99 5-20 2.0-6.3 O. 05-0. 10 4. 5-6. 5 Low. . 8M-Se, SC A-2-6 0 100 100 QO-99 20-35 O. 63-2. 0 O. 10-0. 15 6. 1-8. 4 Low. SP-SM A-3 0 100 100 .90-99 6-12 >20 O. 10-0. 15 4. 5-5. 5 Low. SP-8M A-3 0 100 100 90-99 5-12 >20 <0.05 4. 5-5. 5 Low. SP, GP A-3, A-I 5-25 35-95 40-94 15-90 1-5 >20 <0.05 7.4-8.4 Low. 420.486-72--4 I I I I I : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Stage vs. Area Volume Computations Wade-Trim Project Number: ZZZ2272 Pond Calculations Wade-Trim Project Name: Homeless Emergency Project Designed by: MR Checked by: MER Date: 25-Sep-03 Site Area = Reqd. Treatment Depth = Treatment Volume = Attenuation Storage = acres inches 1 ,129 cf cf Total Required Volume = ,129 cf Pond Pond Increament. Cumulative Pond Stage Stage Area Volume Volume ft. sf cf cf Pond Bottom ~': ::?:;1~ - - " 4.68 3,239 81 81 4.70 3,270 81 162 4.73 3,301 82 244 4.75 3,332 83 327 4.78 3,363 84 411 4.80 3,394 84 495 4.83 3,425 85 580 4.85 3,456 86 666 4.88 3,488 87 753 4.90 3,520 88 841 4.93 3,552 88 929 4.95 3,584 89 1,018 4.98 3,616 90 1,108 DHW = 5.00 5.00 3,648 91 1,199 5.03 3,680 92 1,291 5.05 3,713 92 1,383 5.08 3,746 93 1,476 5.10 3,779 94 1,570 5.13 3,812 95 1,665 5.15 3,845 96 1,761 5.18 3,878 97 1,858 5.20 3,912 97 1,955 5.23 3,945 98 2,053 5.25 3,979 99 2,152 5.28 4,013 100 2,252 5.30 4,047 101 2,353 5.33 4,081 102 2,454 5.35 4,115 102 2,557 5.38 4,150 103 2,660 5.40 4,184 104 2,764 5.43 4,219 105 2,869 5.45 4,254 106 2,975 5.48 4,289 107 3,082 Top of Bank . ':li~~.::t~~ 108 3,190 Treatment provided at DHW = 1,199 c.f. 1 I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I , - I I . I I MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME: Residential Shelter II POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS INCLUDED Pond Bottom Area 3,209.00 ft2 Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 1,199.00 ft3 Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) 6.00 Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base -0.70 ft Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 3.50 ft Elevation of Starting Water Level 4.65 ft Elevation of Pond Bottom 4.65 ft Is there overflow ? y Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.20 Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 4.20 ft/d Factor of Safety 2.00 Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 9.45 ft/d Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.18 Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench 1.00 Hydraulic Control Features: Top Bottom Left Right Groundwater Control Features - Y IN N N N N Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Impervious Barrier - Y IN I N N N N 0.00 I Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 . . I I I I I I I I I I I I . . I I I I; I I I MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROJECT NAME: Residential Shelter II CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW (hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3) r 00.00 - 0.00 3.500 0.000 * 0.00000 0.00 3.500 0.07014 0.06831 3.63 4.740 0.06649 0.00 0.00381 26.00 4.650 0.00261 0.00 0.00140 252.72 4.058 0.00110 0.00 0.00081 377.27 3.952 0.00067 0.00 0.00054 501.81 3.881 0.00047 0.00 0.00039 626.36 3.829 0.00035 0.00 0.00030 750.91 3.790 0.00027 0.00 0.00024 875.45 3.758 0.00022 0.00 0.00019 1,000.00 3.733 0.00 Maximum Water Elevation: 4.740 feet @ 3.63 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 1.723 ft/day Recovery @ 25.998 hours I !I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .......... ....... ,.. ct~;m mr.ah of -.at't:llfah 1Iar~11 1 a, ,.003 ..t=.".. ~J..r.~ l.-lCf on.... "'JJol... .. (7?7~:ll.2.2ll.d ----"'.. ""-".........,..,_......... ~ a""'eol... ....'(".....81' _~..*., ~_ ~............~ ~ 6f ~ _ ~ ,tt- HID nn ,~ IIII~"""'" _c Clf........,........... 1M ~ IIIIIf. ..f.211 .......tb -.t-q.- 1... , ~..,.~,.."., 'J'.~'9A..".r :ta.. . ,. ..,..,..... -.&( 1h1I~". ~.........",._ Lat; HI 1l1ocrlr It raf' Bfn.h.-.-...'- .1'1........1."...". Uhlt' lie, '1 ... iJtw ...... Ao( '-BIll ""~_ L ~ ~ ~'$--- 184.000 , -.w.f....J u.nnn "'~.t......,... ..... ......... ~ - ..... - -..u ... ~ ... aM ~t. .. ___ JimI'- ~ fill ........... ........ ~ 1Il"'~_.., '~n, .Q~ "',~a ~"l__ e::~~V::~i~~h~~:~;J.;".,: ~ .f~D~ ~ ~(I~. 1211 If~ ..t1;y. .. ~.ll olo~ng ~.~. ~nol~~a ~~1. ~naDr.~_ . ..A.IN_. ~.. ~:4f!A. n........J;..~&tl r tJ:m" R~~~I t.~"'."'.'t::Jl:= --- IIC ... ........... ...... - _ "'Itt~ ...... ~ HI tllIIi -' ......, ........... ... ...... ~ 11M ~-:m.\.~'I:'~k.~MJr..-;.11\7~~~~. ~I::.""" .. 1M .... JiIir~. v.... .....c........ ~ ...........~..... :\ III ___ _~ ... II. .......... III .. ...,........ *-I..... _ ...... M4l. _ ...... .........., IIUWMI M 1M ~ ~. ..-c. .......r...u .. .... ... ... ..",... 12-2s-aJS . .. ...., ~ ill M.m.t IItJoo 1'1 .... ~ ~.....,.. \lilt JI..,ar.-. , ......- ~r...Anfo:r n...I, .tr.. iIIoII ....., III _~ ... u- ,.,.. c.. DII nNtW d-e-.r .... .. .. ~ lift .. .... 'F ...... n. ~.wI PDPIdI' ......... ,.", _ t*tII .... .... ......... ... ..... tfi9 -,piInd I D-. . .. All ~ el' -. '1Ii_ ~. faUNIe, ... : "'. 111111I ..... _ 11411ir, "'"- .. 11III ..... ."pef;, - .. .. ..... - · pHIIiIlla NIII AI t" - , , Jl 101M _t .. .... MIl ..... A .. .,.. -- :,- ........ .. __'MI. .... .. ... ...-.- ,..1IudI .. ~ ... ....... ____ .... ... _"... ..~ hIn& -... _ ,... .. I..........~..".......". .(CII...~. ~ _ _ - . . .. 'I'M ....~...... ~~ .__~.&:t:i~.....<<&. III MI ,If NIl a. J1~ "" \. ~ .,,.. 111 ~lliE=-:;'-SK-:"=-:'~~ . ..&.~.~ ...:....iii.: ~ :~s= ~~!&-~.. ---= r. ....._~~.;~.... ---, -' "'=..i~~ ~... ..........r ~.-I U 1.._---.... r:rv...;r. -::. ..\-:: ..:.......-,::r...... .. ...... .... ==-... ~I", .......... ... II ........ ...... .. ~ ~_...d .... -- 1Ift'~.. .. " ...... ...... ..... ." u.. .Apd, 'lOW IIlIl ...... Jt ..t ... lit ............~ "-1Z-03 " .'9"~~....... .....,.,.,........... ~... ..... .., I. Jr.................~.... ...""'"t" .. ........ .. ... ........ ..,.. et NbI<. I'. Ill.......... lift ....... .......... t..r __ ...- .. JIll' II, IeIIeL u. ~.. ~~..J>,.......II"'_ wJorrM,~=~ u..&jbmllld......'.. ~..... ~~..~....._.M!l'_: II oIl" 1M..... ... ~'IM 'I ,-. ~ ::&. :;;:;,.-=..r ':..:r..t; ~ *-'II . lIat,r RiL --- __ ".....w ~ **.... A .....W.. Idp1Itma. (8JLU.,) Olr' BO"Dm. -C~) :":'r-~$~- t..".,) ,.., (a.&J.I AOQIlt........ AoMD ....~ _ /IJ ~ .t 117=: ....~ ~I ~~ , (lULl . --- ----. _"'---__(~1.1 ("'1Jf"r 1 WITH ~~ 17,.. 1m"'",,,, ,.,..",,,,, ~I'" 5.II I I I I I I I I I I 'I J I I 'I ~J 'I . . I I REPORT OF THE PAVEMENT & DRAINAGE AREA INVESTIGATION BETTY LANE & ENGMAN ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated I. I' I I I I I . I .l j" I . I . I I ,I - , I I " . 'I . I , . II I I I d~Si .. DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING and CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING INCORPORATED' Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. 1120 N. Betty Lane Clearwater, Florida 33755 August 27, 2002 Attention: Barbara Green, Administrator RE: Report of the Pavement & Drainage Area Investigation Betty Lane & Engman Road Clearwater, Florida Our File: DES 024539 Dear Ms. Green: Pursuant to your request and authorization, DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. has completed the requested subsurface investigation at the subject site. Presented herein are the results of our findings including pavement design considerations. Studies relative to foundation design recommendations were not requested at this time. At the appropriate time, we would be happy to prepare a proposal to conduct the structure area investigations. INVESTIGATION PROGRAM PAVEMENT AREA BORINGS - To check shallow subsurface soil and groundwater conditions within the planned parking and drive areas, five (5) classification or hand auger borings were performed. Each hand auger boring was terminated at a depth of 6 feet below grade. The hand auger process provides soil samples continuously from below existing grade to the completion depth ofthe borings to check shallow subsurface conditions which could affect pavement design and performance. DRAINAGE AREA TESTING - Three (3) Double-Ring Infiltration (DRI) tests were conducted at the locations identified on a site plan provided for our use. The DRIs were performed at depths of2 to 2.5 feet below present grade. The infiltration test rates for DRI-I and DRI-3 were measured at 2.3 and 2.1 inches per hour, respectively. The test rate recorded at DRI- Sarasota 941/371-3949 Fax: 941/371-8962 Cfearwater P.O. Box 17839. Clearwater, Florida 33762 12220 49th Street North. Clearwater. Florida 33762 727/571-1313. Fax: 727/572-4090 e-mail: desiclwtr@aol.com Tampa 813/948-6027 Fax: 813/948-7645 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I 2 1 waS 0.3 inches per hour. A single classification or hand auger boring was advanced adjacent to each of the DRI test locations. The borings were advanced to a depth of 7 feet below grade. Care must certainly be exercised in the application of infiltration test results to the design of drainage facilities. The analyses of seepage infiltration must include a careful assessment of the permeability characteristics of the substratum soils, hydraulic seepage boundary conditions and other factors which will influence pond operating characteristics. In this regard, the deeper variably organic stratum would tend to hinder infiltration. The results of the testing, including the logs of the borings conducted adjacent to the DRIs are provided in the report attachments and located on Plate I. LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION TESTING - A limited laboratory testing program was also implemented to aid in characterizing the engineering properties of the subsurface soils. Our laboratory tests included four (4) grainsize or sieve analyses and three (3) organic content deterniinations. The results of our laboratory tests are included in the report appendix. A graphical representation of each grainsize analysis is also provided in the attachments. GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SOIL CONDITIONS - Some of the borings were positioned within existing asphalt pavement. The pavement section consisted of 0.5 to 0.75 inches of asphalt followed by about 3 inches ofa . shell or limerock base material. Beneath the pavements, where encountered, the majority of the borings identified gray and brown fine sands with trace silt fines content to the completion depth of the borings. The upper zones at some of the boring locations also contained evidence of shell and concrete fragments. In general the soils were represented by the SP to SP-SM Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) designation. However, some of the borings penetrated a dark brown fine sand with variable organic content beginning about 2 to 3 feet below grade and continuing to depths of3.5 to 5 feet below grade. Laboratory testing revealed organic contents ranging from 2.7% to 9.8% organic matter. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS - Groundwater was encountered during the course of our field investigation at depths ranging from about 2 to 4.1 feet below existing grade. It must be recognized that our investigation took place during a period of moderate to increased rainfall. Based upon the current soil and groundwater conditions, anticipated normal seasonal high groundwater levels were estimated at each DRI location and are included in the following table. Driggers Engineering Services Incorpor'8ted I I I' I> I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 DRI - 1 DRI - 2 DRI - 3 + 12.0:l: ft + 9.2 ft + 10.0 ft + 7.1 :l: ft + 4.3 ft + 3.4 ft + 5.0 ft +7.0:l: ft + 4.5 ft Confirmation of potential seasonal fluctuations would necessitate installation of piezometers followed by monitoring during the current rainy season. PAVEMENT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ASPHALT PAVEMENT - In general our studies have identified sub grade soils considered suitable for support of asphalt pavements. Subgrade conditions typically consisted of fine sand containing trace silt and organic fines content. However, it should be recognized that a highly organic zone was sampled within the DRI-3 boring. Pavements placed above a significant thickness of highly organic material have the potential for undergoing increased settlement related to compression and decomposition of the organic mass. Accordingly, the proposed pavement area within close proximity to DRI-3 should be probed to check the lateral and vertical extent of this zone. Depending on the extent of the deleterious material, over-excavation and replacement may be warranted to prevent excessive Jong-term pavement settlement. In general, subgrade preparation should consist of stripping of surficial pavements, vegetation, root zones, highly organic soils and otherwise unsuitable material. The sub grade should then be proofrolled with vibratory compaction equipment as outlined herein. Areas requiring backfilling or filling to replace unsuitable material or develop pavement grades should utilize fine sand to slightly silty fine sands with a Unified Soil Classification of SP to SP-SM or superior. The subgrade and subsequent fill soils needed to establish design grades should be uniformly compacted to at least 95% of the Modified Proctor maximunl dry density. A dry density of at least 98% ofthe Modified Proctor maximum dry density should be achieved within the upper 12 inches below the pavement section. The fine sand deposits encountered may also require stabilization to improve the bearing characteristics to levels suitable for the support of a conventional flexible pavement section. r~),'i~ J ry' r"; r ')~ J Wlf "~,, -, ,-" I ~;cr 'VI( :c,; I r 1 r:r 11'1 1 (1I';-1t '" I I I I I i I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 Experience suggests that the fine sand deposits may possess Limerock Bearing Ratio values on the order of 15 to 20. Improving the bearing characteristics of the fine sand deposits would necessitate the nominal addition of an admixture such as crushed concrete, or shell. Although specific pavement thickness design must be based upon detailed information relative to traffic frequency and vehicular wheel loads, we have included a table depicting typical pavement sections commonly utilized for parking and access drives for commercial developments. This is intended as a preliminary guide and may require adjustment in the thickness of the pavement structure to accommodate specific area uses. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE (Type S-I or S-III) 1.25 2.0 2.0 BASE COURSE (LIMEROCK, SOIL-CEMENT, CRUSHED CONCRETE or CEMENT-TREATED LIMEROCK) (LBR ~ 100) 6.0 9.0 6.0 STABILIZED SUBGRADE (LI3R ;. 40) 9.0 COMPACTEDSUBGRADE (LBR;e 15) 12 12 12.0 The selection of the type of asphaltic concrete surface should consider both aesthetics and utility. Commonly, ifFDOT Type S-III mix is considered more suitable in areas that will be subjected to primarily light vehicular wheel loads and foot traffic. This is a finer graded mix that is relatively smooth and aesthetically pleasing. On the other hand, an FDOT Type S-I is a courser graded mix that is usually less desirable in foot traffic areas. However, this mix is much tougher and has higher stability than a Type S-III and is more suited for truck loading and unloading areas that may be subjected to concentrated wheel loads and shearing strains associated with lock-wheel tUl11S. The Type S-IlI mix under this wheel loading condition is more [lr^I<Ju"r',; ! r1<Jlfl< "',,'ir "I :;rT\lI(;C'; Irl(;( "!Jel'ilLer I I I I I I . - - I I , - I - ~ J J I . . ~I - , J 'I I I 5 susceptible to marring and deformation especially in the early life of the mix during periods of elevated temperature. Your attention is directed to the potential for high groundwater levels following heavy rainfall events. In this regard, it is important to consider developing grades so as to maintain the bottom of the base course or stabilized subgtade at least 18 inches above the anticipated high groundwater level which may temporarily rise to within 12 to 18 inches below present grade in the planned pavement areas. Also it would be prudent to consider a base course that is more resistant to softening and deformation when subjected to temporary saturation from heavy rainfall events. Both soil-cement and crushed concrete have been utilized in this application with demonstrated success. We consider soil-cement to represent a superior base course type for this application. However, soil-cement usually develops drying shrinkage cracks which can reflect through an asphaltic concrete wearing surface. Although not detrimental to pavement performance, such cracks may be considered aesthetically displeasing to some. Consideration could also be given to high quality, plane processed, cement-treated linierock products that are available with reduced cement contents that are capable of providing a moisture resistant baSe course with significant minimization, if not elimination, of shrinkage cracks. When considering soil-cement or cement- treated base, we would suggest a minimum seven (7) day compressive strength of 300 psi. CONCRETE PAVEMENTS - The exploratory borings have identified subgrade soils which would also be considered suitable for concrete pavements. We would suggest utilization of a modulus of sub grade reaction, ~, equal to 150 pci. Also, it is important during the construction stage to establish a firm unyielding base to prevent nits in the sub grade prior to concrete placement. Peaks and valleys in the sub grade will cause the concrete to have abrupt thickness changes which could cause increased stress concentrations and cracking. Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated , I I I . , I , I I I , . I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. appreciates this opportUnity to be of . service to you on this project. Should you have any questions regarding our findings, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. Wayne . ggers Proj ect Engineer FL Registration No. 58013 . me Driggers, P .E. esident FL Registration No. 16989 WSDIFJD:wsd WSD-REP\024539 Copies submitted: (2) Homeless Emergency Project, Inc.; Attn: Barbara Green (1) Wade-Trim, Inc.; Attn: Michael Reineke Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated I I l I , I , l - I , l - I , 1 I , ;; I . . I - . - I I I 1 I -... ,J - I I I APPENDIX PLATE I.. BORING LOCATION PLAN PAVEMENT AREA BORING LOGS DRAINAGE AREA TESTING SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS GRAINSIZE ANALYSES METHOD OF TESTING Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated I I I , I I - - I -.,1: J I :- - I '~_ i I . J J I I I PLATE I - BORING LOCATION PLAN Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated ( ,. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I fl ~ , :1 rl I I PAVEMENT AREA BORING LOGS Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated I I I , I I I - I , . I i - I ":" ... I I I I - . J I I I -=I~~i DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORA TED HAND AUGER BOIDNG LOG PROJECT: CLIENT: Homeless Emergency Project , Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Clearwater, Florida WATER-TABLE: I DATE: DES024539 3.7' 8/16/02 TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH: J.D. 8/16/02 6.0' LOCATION: TEST NUMBER: See Plate I HA-1 ..I " ELEV. DEPTH 0 DESCRIPTION lIJ REMARKS (FT) (FT) :IE >- (/) Grayish-brown slightly silty Fine SAND with 0 ~~ ~ ~i Iimerock fraQments (SP-SM) ~:': ~.eJ- l Dark brown slightly silty Fine SAND with a trace 0 'L': r J. .1:'" I' limerock (SP-SM) :'1"1: iei . Gray Fine SAND (SP) : :::: ...... 1 .......... .. .... .. .. ...- .. ....- ...... . -0... .... .. Dark grayish-brown Fine SAND (SP) . ...- 0.0._ ...... .... . . eo... .... .. . ...- I I" I_ ...... 2 '. "I... .... .. . II I- I I".. ". .... ......... .. .... .... .. ...- .. ...- ."... .. ........ .. ..... .. Brown slightly silty Fine SAND (SP-SM) :, :,: c I /.:1: t F. 3 ., :1: t r .!~:(~: 'J:I:nl :,:,:n .t :,: t'l: ., :,: t ( .. ...- r .1: t 1: 4 'J:I: r l ] Light brown Fine SAND (SP) : . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . : . . . . .. . . 6 . . 7 -=I~~i 'I I DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES- INCORPORATED I I , I I - I I I I I I , I I . . :- I I I lIAND AUGER BORING LOG - PROJECT: CLIENT: Homeless Emergency Project Homeless Emeroency Proiect. Inc. Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE: DES024539 2.1' 8/16/02 TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH: J.D. - 8/16/02 6' LOCATION: TEST NUMBER: See Plate I HA-2 ..J ELEV. DEPTH 0 DESCRIPTION al REMARKS (FT) (FT) ::E >- en ASP HAL T Pavement 0 \1 \1 SHELL Base \1\1 .' :'; ':' r Gray Fine SAND with trace of shell ., :1: t r lSP-SM) :. ...:.~ . . ~:~ :}5 Dark Gray, Slightly Silty, Slightly Organic Fine ,';l:t I: ......ii::: SAND (SP-SM) 1 .... .... .. .... Gray Fine SAND (SP) .. .... ...... ........ .. .... .... .. ...- .. ...- ..... .. .. eo...... .... .... .. 0"- .. .0,_ ..... .. .. eo...... .... ... 2 .. ..,' Light Grayish-:-Brown Fine SAND (SP) .. ...' .. ,',- .".. .. ..... .. ........ .. ..... .. Light Grayish-Brown Fine SAND (SP) ........ .. .... .... .. .. " .. ...- ..,.. .. , ........ .. .... .... .. ...' 3 .. .'.- ..... .. .. '....... ..-" ".. .. ...- 0.0._ ..... " ...... .. .... ".. .. ...- . .' ,- ..... .. "..... .. ..-.. .. .. ...- .. ...- 4 ..... " Light Brown Fine SAND (SP) . . .' . . .' .. . . . . .' . . . .' . . .' .. .. . .. . . .' . . . .' . . .' .. .. . .. . . . . .' . 5 . . .' .' .. .. . . . . . . . .' . .' '. . . .. .. . . . . . . . .' . . . . .. . . .' .' .. .. . . . . . . . .' . 6 . . . . 7 I. I I _ f. . > I , I I I cti I I - I - . I , I I , , I I I -=I~~i DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORA TED HAND AUGER BOmNG LOG PROJECT: CLIENT: Homeless Emergency Project Homeless Emergencv Project, Inc. Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE: DES024539 2.0' 8/16/02 TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH: J.D. 8/16/02 - 6' LOCATION: TEST NUMBER: See Plate I HA-3 ...1 ELEV. DEPTH 0 DESCRIPTION 10 REMARKS (FT) (FT) == )0- f/) ASPHAL T Pavement 0 Shell Base : ,. 0- 0' ,- Gray Fine SAND (SP) ..... . ..... . . 00. .. . ..,' 0" .' ...... ..0.. . .... ., Grayish-Brown Slightly Silty Fine SAND With 1 ~ ~rl- Traces Of Roots (SP-SM) ,...-;....'\-. ~;ijt .'\-',1:11 'r:.' ..... ~i:~' 'J:I! 1 . ......' Brown Fine SAND (SP) .... .. . ..0' 0' .- ..... . 2 .00.. . .... .. 0..0_ 000." .-.... . .00.. . ...... . .. .- Light Brown Fine SAND (SP) . .. 0" 000._ ..... . .... . .... .. 0.. 0_ 0._ 00 3 ..... . ...... . .... .. . .. o' 000._ ..... . ..... . .... .. 00.0' 000.' ..... . . 00... .... .. 0.. 0_ 000._ ..... . 4 .00.. . .... .. .. .' 0' .' ...... . .00.. . ..... .. 00, .' 0' 0' .'..0 . ... . ..... . 0.00.. ..0' 0' 0' '. ..... . 5 ..... . .... .. .. .. .. .. ..... . ..... . ..' . .. Light Gray. Clayey Fine SAND (SP-SC) "./,,/. ;-:/'.,1 , ~/;.: r:.(;..-: : ,,:..r:)' 6 7 I 'I I I I I I , . I I I I I I . , I .1 , :- I I I -=I~~i DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED HAND AUGER BORING LOG PROJECT: CLIENT: Homeless Emergencv Proiect, Inc. Homeless Emergency Project Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE: DES024539 3.6' 8/16/02 TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH: , J.D. 8/16/02 6' LOCATION: TEST NUMBER: See Plate I HA-4 ..J ELEV. DEPTH 0 DESCRIPTION lQ REMARKS (FT) (FT) ~ \ ASPHAL T Pavement 0 'V 'V SHELL Base 'V 'V . '. :1..--'>,..; Dark Gray Fine SAND With Traces Of Roots : .;;,:: ~ (SP) t;;~ :}- oj ...,:,>;:' . >7ti': ~ , 1 .....-.. :l:: '.: : .t(-i : , fJ ;;: 'ft-. /I\I:..:~' . ',~.:-! ~., .'t.!,: ~~, .. .. ~ .... .. ~ :;.\ '" . ',. 2 : ::;':~: . .. 'ij .' . .. ,:' " ... .\, ~~:-.,}}'.. . ~'Irti' .p. ~:....~ Gray Fine SAND (SP) ..... .. .. .... .. .. o. ..... .. ......... .. ..... .. .. ..... 3 .. ...- ... ... .. eo...... ..-.. .. .. .. o. .. .... ..... .. ........ .. ..-.. .. .. .. o. .. ...- ..... .. ........ .. .... .. .. .... 4 .0._ ..0... ... .. .. 0-" .... .. .- 0" .. ... ... ... .. .......... .. .. .- Dark Brown Slightly Silty Fine SAND (SP-SM) .1 :1: l t . ~~: ~. ~. 5 '.1 :1: r t. j : 1 :1: ~ 1 .i ;1: ~ 'l: ., :1: l r 'tj:Ji: :J:1:t II :1.:1: n. .1 ;1: t I' 6 .n: l ( . 7 I I I , I I , I , - I , I - I I I I , I , - I I I -=I~~i DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED HAND AUGER BORING LOG PROJECT: Homeless Emergency Project CLIENT: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE: DES024539 4.1' 8/16/02 TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH: J.D. 8/16/02 6' LOCATION: TEST NUMBER: See Plate I HA-5 ...I ELEV, DEPTH 0 DESCRIPTION In REMARKS (FT) (Fn ~ Dark Brown Organic Fine SAND With Roots (SP) 0 "".4...~:.. ...00.. .. Dark Brown Fine SAND (SP) .. ...... .. 00._. ". ... 0........ .. ..... .... : :::: ...... .. 00...... ...0 .. 0.. ._ Gray/Dark Gray Slightly Silty Fine SAND With 1 I,~ :1: ~ !' . 'l:J: tJ, Shell Fragments (SP-SM) ,I :1: C ~' :"':1: t i ' r;tL ),' :~:I: ~ H 'L:crJ. " :1:' .. 2 :1 :1: ~ ,. , Dark Gray Organic Fine SAND (SP) -.... ..:~ -- ... ..::-= "'. ..., !-o"" ...."WII ;~~:: ........... ..... ,..- -.- -... t::i ::; .I'" ..... .,.:J ",'.\ 3 ;:~ t:~ -- ..".. ~= :-: "'. ..., o":~ ~.'" Gray Fine SAND (SP) .... ... . ..0- 0.0," ..... . ...0.. . ..00. . . ..." 000._ ...... 4 ...0.. . .... .. 0.00" 000. . ....... .... . ........ . .... .. .. .. ," Dark Gray/Brown, Slightly Silty Fine SAND '.1 :1: ~ r. . :1 :1: Cl (SP-SM) "':1; t F, 5 " ',I: t r 'r:':~;: '.1: I: t t 1 :I.:I:H. ,1 :1: t I' ,".1: t ( . 000" r .1', ~. 1: J:I:rLl 6 : I :1: ~ ; 7 I ," r ,. I' I~' ->, I' . . I': '. 1 f I: I II I: I: I: . I t:"",--....J II I 'I DRAINAGE AREA TESTING Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated Job No: DES 024539 Test No. DRI - 1 Date: 8/7/02 Client: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc; Project: Homeless Emergency Project; Betty Lane & Engmann Street; Clearwater, FL Location: See Sketch Test Depth: 2.0' Outer Cyl. Diam: 36" Inner Cyl. Diam: 12" Description of Soil at Test Depth: Dark Gray Slightly Silty Fine SAND with finely divided organic material Depth of Groundwater Below Test Depth: 0.8' Infiltration Rate: 2.3 In/Hr TEST PROCEDURE: The test was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 3385-75. A seven (7") inch hydraulic head was utilized. The infiltration rate was determined at selected time intervals by recording the time for a 1 inch drop in water level. The seven (7") inch head was then re-established until the next test interval. The test was continued (minimum 4 hours) until stability was achieved and the infiltration rate did not vary in excess of 5%. between successive one (1) hour measurements. Readings were recorded at intervals not exceeding 30 minutes. The plotted infiltration rate above represents the average of all observations during eac hour interval. I Technician: P.C. Reviewed by: I I I: Ii 1'1 I 11 , I' I I[ , I t , .. I' . t I I: " - Ir . i I' . I I' I , I I.. ! . . j I" . . I . I' DOUBLE RING INFILTRATION TEST 6 -~ ------- ---- 5 0::: ;:) o 4 :I: ~ l Q) iU 3 0::: l: o :p C'CI :E 2 l;:: .5 o o 2 3 4 5 6 7 Elapsed Time of Infiltration - HOURS I I I , I: I . I I~ '.: I I , I' I . I ~ - 1 11 " i I . i I' I I' . * ;1 [ ...1 I I . . I- -=I~~i DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORATED HAND AUGER BORING LOG PROJECT: CLIENT: Homeless Emergencv Prolect,lnc. Homeless Emergency Project Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE: DES024539 2.8' 8/7/02 TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH: P.C. 8/7/02 7' LOCATION: TEST NUMBER: See Plate I DRI-1 ..J ELEV. DEPTH 0 DESCRIPTION In REMARKS (FT) (FT) == >- . II) . Brown Fine SAND (SP) o ( . .O'.. .. ...- ... ... ..O' .. .......... .. ..00.. .. .. ..... .. .0._ .-. ... ... .. .......... .. .0.... .. 0.... .. .. .0." ... ... 0.0.... .. 1 ..... .. 0.. ._ 0.0._ ...... .. eo.... .... .. 0.. ._ .. .0._ ...... .. eo...... .... .. 0.0.- 0- .- ....... .. eo...... 2 .... .. Dark Gray, Slightly Silty Fine SAND With Finely :..U:t::: ;'"t C1: Divided Organic Material (SP-SM) *:iEt,:, h:fol- :t:tE'l: ,rot Cf: ':; "t ':~.:i: flf..... 3 : "l~ ~tE.1: ~:t J:l- Ii'.~ t (- Light Brown Fine SAND (SP) .. eo...... .... .... .. ...... .. .0._ ...... .. eo...... . .... .. 0.... .. .. 000" 4 .... .. , '. . . , , " ". .. , .. , . . '. , .' .. . .. , o. . , .00 ..' " 0' 5 .. . .. ,. . '00 ' . 0.0 .. .' Light Brown Fine SAND (SP) . , .. , . ., 0' 6 .. . . . . . . . , , . . , . . 7 I '11 Ir . I I j, Ir , I' '.. l It I' j I I ,. { I , I Cl I ,~ 1 I ;~ ) I I . I ~:; t I I I , I DOUBLE RING INFILTRATION TEST Job No: DES 024539 Test No. DRI-2 Date: 8/7/02 Client: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Project: Homeless Emergency Project; Betty Lane & Engmann Street; Clearwater, FL Location: See Sketch Test Depth: 2.0' Outer Cyl. Diam: 36" Inner Cyl. Diam: 12" Description of Soil at Test Depth: Gray and Brown Fine SAND with trace shell Depth of Groundwater Below Test Depth: . 0.8' Infiltration Rate: 0.3 In/Hr 6 5 ~ :) o 4 :I: ~ I Gl 1V 3 ~ c o ~ RI J:l 2 is .E o o . 2 3 4 5 6 7 Elapsed Time of Infiltration - HOURS TEST PROCEDURE: The test was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 3385-75. A seven (7") inch hydraulic head was utilized. The infiltration rate was determined at selected time intervals by recording the time for a 1 inch drop in water level. The seven (7") inch head was then re-established until the next test interval. The test was continued (minimum 4 hours) until stability was achieved and the infiltration rate did not vary in excess of 5% between successive one (1) hour measurements. Readings were recorded at intervals not exceeding 30 minutes. The plotted infiltration rate above represents the average of all observations durin each ur interval. Reviewed by: Technician: P.C. I I , . - I '. i I - I I ~ _ .I. I i I l~ t I ;~ I I \~ " I < I; I c, I I i~ I I I 1::IE!~i DRIGGERS IN CORPORA TED ENGINEERING SERVICES HAND AUGER BORING LOG PROJECT: CLIENT: Homeless Emergency Project ' Homeless Emergency Proiect, Inc. Clearwater, Florida WATER TABLE: I DATE: DES024539 2.8' 8/6/02 TECHNICIAN: DATE: I COMPLETION DEPTH: P.Co 8/6/02 7' LOCATION: . TEST NUMBER: See Plate I DRI-2 ..I ELEV. DEPTH 0 DESCRIPTION a:l REMARKS (FT) (FT) == >- CI) Dark Gray, Slightly Silty Fine SAND With Traces 0 :;tt ;' Of Shell &. Concrete (SP-SM) .~ .n. ...... e. :1 :1:'i1't. 1 .1 :,:,~ .... .. .. .. .i:tl' .':. t r 1 '~~:"'i. . . . ... :J~~~ '1. ~ 1 .1 :f: t 'l: "'.1:1( ~.:.: 7'!;. Gray & Brown Fine SAND With Traces of Shell :: ~: ..... .. (SP) '.:"Y::: 2 e. ..- .0 e_ :::V: ........ .. .... .. 0.. .. '. 'Q:: . ...0.... .. : '.:~: 0 .. .0.. ..... .. :. :~: :. : 3 .. 00..- ..... .. : : :V: . ..... .... ..0- 0" .. : .'\J: ' : .. e....... .... .. : : 'Q': ...... .... 0.0.... .. ....... " Gray Fine SAND (SP) .. 00...... 4 .... .... .. e. ," ..... . ... . ......... .. .. ... .. .. ." o. .. ..... . .... 0"..... . ..... .... .. ...- .0.. ..... .. .." .. . e..... 5 .... .. .. 00 .. .- ..... . ... .. ........ .. .... . . .. o. 0- .- ..... . .... .. ........ .. ..w. .. ..0- .- .- ..... - ... . ."".. . .... .. 6 .. .' ." .- ..... . .." " "'... . ..' . 00 ." .. .". . ..... . .." , ..... . ..". .. .., " .' .' ..... , ..' . ..... . " '. o. .. o' 7 ,', . C' I I I i I , I I i I , j I I I I t-:- i I '.: t - .-, J I "-" J I l~ t I I I ~: i I DOUBLE RING INFILTRATION TEST Job No: Client : Project: Location: DES 024539 Test No. DRI-3 Date: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Homeless Emergency Project; Betty Lane & Engmann Street; Clearwater, FL See Sketch 8/7/02 Test Depth: 2.5' Outer Cyl. Diam: 36" Inner Cyl. Diam: 12" Description of Soil at Test Depth: 'Gray Fine Sand with shell Depth of Groundwater Below Test Depth: 1.1' Infiltration Rate: 2.1 In/Hr 6 5 . ~ -- 0: ;:) o 4 :z: ~ l Cl) CiS 3 0: c:: o :;::: ClS E 2 l;:: .5 o o 2 3 4 5 6 7 Elapsed Time of Infiltration - HOURS TEST PROCEDURE: The test was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 3385-75. A seven (7") inch hydraulic head was utilized. The infiltration rate was determined at selected time intervals by recording the time for a 1 inch drop in water level. The seven (7") inch head was then re-established until the next test interval. The test was continued (minimum 4 hours) until stability was achieved and the infiltration rate did not vary in excess of 5% between successive one (1) hour measurements. Readings were recorded at. intervals not exceeding 30 minutes. The plotted infiltration rate above represents the average of all observations during each our interval. Reviewed by: Technician: P.C. I , > I I.. I' I I I ~ I I I I "- j' 'I I L i I ; ;1 , I "'-> I ~.. " I I -=I~~i DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES INCORPORA TED PROJECT: TECHNICIAN: LOCATION: ELEV. (FT) Homeless Emergency Project Clearwater, Florida DES024539 P.C. CLIENT: HAND AUGER BORING LOG Homeless Emergen WATER TABLE: 3.6' DATE: 817102 TEST NUMBER: DRI-3 See Plate I DESCRIPTION DEPTH (FT) Gray Fine SAND With Limerock Fragments 0 (SP) Gray Fine SAND With Abundant Shell (SP) Dark Gray Highly Organic, Silty Fine SAND With Trace Of Roots (Pt) Gray Fine SAND (SP) ...I o en ~ II) REMARKS 1 2 3 4 5 ... . ..- . 6 . -. .. ... .. ... . '." . . '. ..' ". .. ..' .. '.. . '.0 . .. . . ., . .' 7 I I I ~ . I r I i, I '- j I G: J I I .-. ~ I~ 'C t I ...-:- i i I I~ . i I ,: 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS I , . I a"~ t I I ". I ..; ji I Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated _:_:~~:_~~-~:_.~:_._~-_._~--_.~.-. SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ATTERBERG BORING DEPTH DESCRIPTION W% Id G, LIMITS P.P. U.C. CON G.S. ORG pH CI. S04 RES. NO. (ft) (pet) (tst) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (Ohm-cm) LL PL SL DRI-I 2.0 - 3.4 Dark gray slightly silty Fine SAND with finely divided . organic material . . DRI-2 1.7-3.9 Gray and brown Fine SAND with trace of shell DRI-3 2.8 - 5.1 Dark gray organic silty Fine SAND with trace ofrools . 9.8 HA-2 0.6 - 0.9 Dark gray slightly silty, slightly organic Fine SAND 2.7 HA-3 0.9 - 1.7 Dark grayish-brown slightly silty Fine SAND with trace of . roots HA-5 2.0- 3.4 Dark gray organic Fine SAND 5.0 . . W% Water Content Con. Consolidation Test CLIENT: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Y d (pef) Dry Density G.S. (H) Grainsize Analysis (Hydrometer) Gs Specific Gravity ORG. (%) Organic Content LL Liquid Limit CI. (ppm) Total Chloride PRO.ttCT: Homeless Emergency Project PL Plastic Limit S04 (ppm) Total Sulfate Clearwater, Florida SL Shrinkage Limit RES. (ohm-crn) Lab Resistivity P.P. (tsf) PocketPenetromcter * See Test Curves FILE: DES 024539 U.c. Unconfined Compression .. Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve , ' I I . I I . I II I I ; !, - I I , I I I I I . I I I .:. ~ I . , I' GRAINSIZE ANALYSES Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated - - .. fila .... ~_ :_ ~ ::_ :_ :_ ._ =_ ._ :_ ._ __. ,_. ._ DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. u. s Sta...,.,c1 so.w Opemnp in Inches U. S Stan<hnl ~ Nu........ tfJd- 20 3 2 r~ I I t ) 4 6 10 ,.I ,~ 20 JO .0. 50 70 100 140 I I I i" , . ,,~ '\ " . \ \ - I \ \ \ \ \ '; - 1\ "--" . I " 100 90 80 70 1: llG ii 60 ~ >- .., ~ 50 i.L c .. ~ 40 .. a.. 30 10 o 100 0.05 5 05 01 Grain Size in Millimeters SAND 0.01 50 0.005 10 ~ GRAVEL SILT or CLAY Coarse FIne umber Depth Natural Moisture Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. Classification P.L P. I. L L. Ct.IENT: DRI-1 Dark gray slightly silty F~ne SAND PROJECT: Homeless Emergency Project Clearwater, Florida 2.0 - 3.4' material FILE: DES 024539 o 10 20 30 1: .. 40 ~ >- .., . 50 ~ ~ U C 60 .. u . Cl.. 70 80 90 100 0.001 ...:-- ,..... ., w..,,<,..: '~'- :-- ~.- ~... ::.. ~- :- ._ c... ~._ .:- ~.- ~-; DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. U. S S.........d so..... Open.np in Inches U. S S"ndard Sieve Humben Hyd- 20 3 z It I I t 3 4 6 10 14 16 ZO JO 40 50 70 100 140 l(I I , 1-... I I " . . - .I~ ... . f'.. '\. . \ , \ \ \ \ . . \ \ \ - \ ~ --. I i I 100 90 80 70 1:' .. 0;60 ~ >- .J::J ~ 50 l.i: C II ~ 40 C> 0.. 30 10 o 100 50 5 10 Q5 01 Grain Size in Millimeters SAND 0.05 0.01 0.005 ~ GRAVEL SilT or CLAY Coarse FIne umber Depth Natural Moisture PROJECT: Homeless Emergency Project ClearwaTer, Florida p, L P. I. LL. Classification CLI ENT: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. brown Fine SAND with trace DRI-2 1.7 - 3.9' FILE: DES 024539 ,_: - o 10 20 30 1:' .. 40 ~ >. .J::J t 50 t ~ u C 60 ~ t 0.. 70 80 90 100 0.001 - .. .. ::.. ~- ~.- ~..- :.," ~:- -.. ,,- ..- :..- - .:- '- ~..- DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. U. S Stanclwd so.... Opentnp in Inches U. S Standard Siew Numbers H,dtomelar >- .0 3 Z I~ I I ~ ] 4 6 10 14 16 ZO 30 40 50 70 100 140 \ I I I I I I \ \ . \ "- !- - . . "- ., \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ . , 1\ . . .--. I 100 90 80 70 E "" OJ 60 ~ ~ ~ 50 i4: C AI ~. 40 AI CL 30 20 10 o 100 50 5 0.5 Grain Size in Millimeters SAND 10 0.05 0.1 0.Q1 0.005 ~ I GRAVEL SILT or CLAY C~r'Se fine umber Oept h Natural Moisture Homeless Emergency Project, Inc. P. L P. L Classific;ation LL. CLIENT: DRI-3 Dark gray organic silty Fine SAND PROJECT: Homeless Emergency Project Clearwater, Florida 2.8 - 5.1' FILE: DES 024539 100 0.001 - - o 10 20 30 1: .. 40 ~ >- .0 t -SO f '" o o C 60 ~ AI CL 70 80 90 .-:- ,_ '~I ..; ~i_ ~.; ... ,_; ..: ,_~ ._: .-J .-, _. _ .... .. DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. U. 5 Slanclwd so.- Opetllnp in Incllft U. 5 S'-ndatd Sieve N.,;,,1Ien 1f1d- 20 3 2 J~ 1 I + 3 . 6 10 '. '" 20 30 .0 50 70 100 140 I' I -... . . I' ''\ '\~ \ , \ , \ \ I . \ \ - \ . ,- j . - II 100 90 80 70 L: ... ii60 ~ "" .a ~ 50 ~ C .. ~ 40 a.. 30 10 o 100 50 5 10 0.5 Grain Size in Millimeters SAND 0,1 0.05 0.01 0.005 ~ GRAVEL L SilT or CLAY C~ru Fine umber Depth Natural Moisture Homeless Emergency Project. Inc. P. I. P. L L L, Classification CLIENT: HA-3 Dark grayish-brown slightly silty Fine SAND with trace of roots PROJECT: Homeless Emergency Project Clearwater. Florida 0.9 ,.. 1.7' FILE: DES 024539 o 10 20 30 L: ... 40 ~ "" .D t 50 ~ ... o U C 60 ~ .. a.. 70 80 90 100 0.001