FLD2003-02007A
it
e ORIGINAL
Cleanvater
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727 -562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #: ________________________
DATE RECEIVED: ___________________
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ___________
ATLAS PAGE #: ____________________
ZONING DISTRICT: __________________
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: _________
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
1:1 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
1:1 SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
1:1 SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE i..________
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION MAY 1 7 2uUJ
Comprehensive InfiD Project (Revised 12/3012004)
p~(:; DErARTMENT
t" WAT R
:~Pl~::'~I:A:~~;::;:Z;R f1:~:~NT 27~AT'ON: (Code Sec'mn 4-202.A)
MAILlNGADDRES~Oa/JM4'(/t:aJAlz,(,;JL.' ~~, (jU~rttzlC. r-Z JeJi &7
4<17-9"&1 FAX NUMBER: '';:<If.. .. ?k5t" .
- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
PHONE NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):)~t.f;)~(!;)jt?Lt~iA:Jd--;;{)C~, ~"" M~~ t
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
AGENT NAMEJ!ot/.51/ 6dJv'I1L~~llti.fJd~/,;c/&;~tft!LI.J4 S,tulICL.J,/,)<;--t
MAILING ADDRESS:Cat; le4J~ 1M d~t ~~V,t'~A-dACuk Et ~?4?
Aj!..$d-M/,fd_ FAX NUMBER:~<lt,,:-- .cf0.3&
CELL NUMBER: 7f) f~{) 9~ . E-MAIL ADDRESStltsbl!ljclld;~~kJt..tJ9 ;:;
PHONE NUMBER:
:~R:::::::: o~::~,~~:~;~ I:JZ;:;;;;;;::1]7~2.A)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lois... ..so-.sz~E~c4.JJ,__.~.. !.
PARCEL NUMBER: (iq;17L~~93?72?a?fJ<<J.s'O:su~, DJ .~S 20.
PARCEL SIZE: It S Z 1t&!t.5 ZZ,v.:S:5s, (--.
(acres, s.;e .:.~) \ /
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): tZ ~.1j'fJL1M.._~iidt.d~'dttAL~:lf.J-_L~t!-.d--_-
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) bt!: /l)~
,
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):Stt!L, 4~~d
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include aU requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces. specific use. etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
-
e
ORJGINAL
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ___ NO ____ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY. DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria Is achieved, In detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, denslty'and character of adjacent properties in which it
l~ located.
-Ju~~~C!,Jui_______
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
Impair the value thereof.
____ S~L at.~~tl
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
~--A~d---
4. The proposed development Is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
6~L- /I-~~~ct
5. Jhe proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
~tl 4~td
6. Thedesign of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects. including visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
4i1:.A~ JliL
~1t
,
o . Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria Is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractlcal without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
~-----------------------------------
Af7!1ldt ___ . ___________
..'1fL
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
e
e
ORIGINAL
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensIve InfIll redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
Improvements.)
==~~L-_A~L(l=~-===~==========-~=
3. The uses within the comprehensive InfIlI redevelopment project are otherwise permitted In the City of Clearwater.
Ri~dtd
&t!
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
At6A~~~
-~--- 6~
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive Inflll redevelopment project are not
otherwise available In the City of Clearwater.
___JJ.~A~~cI
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infIlI redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
&i
A 'Ci:~.LcL
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive InfIlI redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the Immediate vicInity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole..
~L~
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parkIng are justified by the benefits to community character and the
ImmedIate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
6~c A-~/Gd
9. Adequate off-street parking in the ImmedIate vicinity according to the shared parking formula In Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoId on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
's~LA~dLT
10. The desfgn of all buildIngs complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in DivIsion 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
~c! A~6hWt tL
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
e
e
ORIGINAL
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve
addition or modification of Impervious surface, including buildings, must Include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the
City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction In impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption t
this requirement.
If a plan is not required; the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
~~ minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: '
xisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
~ roposed grading including flnlshed flO, or elevations of all structures;
__ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ,
Proposed storm water detention/retentlon area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
_ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
City manual.
, Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval Is required prior to Issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable .
o Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must Initial one of the following):
____ Stormwater plan as noted above is included
___ Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative Is attached. At a minImum. a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be
provided.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA STORMWATER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the CIty Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202,A)
~iGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (Including legalpescription of property) - One original and 14 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (Including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
~nCIUding drip lines and Indicating trees 10 be removed) - please design around the exIstIng trees;
~~ . LOCATiON MAP OF THE PROPERTY; .
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
ltl'the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be .In' accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or riot
'deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following Information (not to exceed 24" x 36'):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing Individual sheets Included In package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identiflcation of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, elc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of ail street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infiii Application 2005- City of Clearwater
e
e
ORIGINAL
o
~
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and 11ft stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depletion by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(I) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all on site and offslte storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, Including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed In square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F AR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) and color rendering if possible;
D FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional Information on site plan:
_ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
~r Offsite elevations If required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
__ Streets and drives (dimensioned); .
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a .certlfied arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
D
H, LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
~
~~~
D
D
D
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping Islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including drlpllnes (as IndIcated on
required tree survey); .
Plant schedule wlth a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, speclfiqltions and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, Including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, Indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including Instructions, soli mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and .
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 14 X 11) (color rendering If possible);
IRRiGATiON PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
,
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
e
e
ORIGINAL
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required In the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. TourIst and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
< BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings Including height dimensions, colors and materials;
~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with co~ors and materials to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, If
possIble) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indIcate whether they will be removed or
to remain. .
~t'>(AII PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location. size, height, colors, materIals and drawing; freestanding signs
\ ~hall include the street address (numerals)
,
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced slgnage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign?rogram application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of servIce for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
. WlII affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that Is
\. tY on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
'" ~ Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (lTE) Trip 'General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared In accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
o Acknowledgement oftrafflc impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
__ Traffic Impact Study Is included. The study must Include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
legs and each turning movement at all Intersections IdentIfied In the Seoplng Meellng.
___ Traffic Impact Study Is not required.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
'O'CCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750:
L. SIGNATURE:
d signed, acknowledge that all representations made In this
applic io are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
auth z City representatives to visit and photograph the property
des b In this application.
:..
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Il'-
~ and subscribed beforsA jTle this day of
~D. 20J6:? to me and/or by
_ . who is personally known has
ro uced _ _ __ ______ as
_1e4t~ca;:'-i~4 ~
~UbliC, '
My commission expi
JlM' EN A. WILLIAMS
~ ...~ MY COMMISSION # DO 155802
"'Dft\ll~ EXPIRES: October 14. 2006
1~3-NOTARY FL NotllJy Service & Bonding, Inc.
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Inflll Application 2005- City of Clearwater
May 11 05 04:22p Ro~ers Beach elopment
e5/11/2aes 15:16 7274468836
7.9256
NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS
p.1
PAG!:.. tll/m
ORIGINAL
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AG!:NT:
~-~
RINT flJll names)
I "
-
,"
I ,. That (181'M/we a.,) 1"& owner(s) and roeord OIls holc91(ll) Ilf ll'oe following ~escrlbr:d propeMv (addl'Gls or 9811IlrallllClltion):
t,.JVJ ~~.&M~ [L.
2. ThaI thia prgPllrty cClrlll1b1lllSlhe property for which a rt~U1I.tfQrll: fde:scrlbe req~ ~
()~L ~~ ttJt4~~~.:J~ D:J ~l :11d6 ru~
~~].! J 0.<:). Ire: it ~ L'
I ~. That the unde~jgnttrl lhrulhllll8' 4tHllllnl.ad Md ~dtle!1dD~ Rnpnl"': ,J,. ~J ~1I4-m .~./I. ~J/~V
1,&14i-JN~Jl} S~iJ, IJe..
I
I
~~a".\ ,{
j
.. . . j
9$ (hi,llhelr)lIgsol(s) to axacl.lfe any llelillo/'llJ 01' otI'Ier dClQUment5 nllC1lssary la afred such pelf1lon;
4. That this a1Ilrlavit l'Q bllQII R"eolltecllo Induce lhl! Cllyo' Clearwaler. Florida 10 QOn,ll1er .nd ae1 an lJo.e abov8 described prClperty;
5. That site 'r'l&ils 10 the PlOllerty ~re neae.uBI)' by Cllv llIltlMUnlllll\illlA In oreler t/) orocess I11ls IDDlbllon and the ltWIIlt, l! o1l1ori",.,. ell"
I'iIpl'f)SenI8i1\1$l110 Visl~ ana )lhCIrOllrepp 1I11l1 Sll'O/leny rl.salDIClII'lIhia appl'caHnn; .
B. T1lal (r/~), lho underslgnld au1I1orUy. "arab)' celflfyl~t 1he roregolng Is 11\18 and corra~.
fr2
Property Ownlr
Property Owno'
l'ropen y Ow""r
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
PrOperty OlM1ef
STAlE OF FLORIDA,
~.".y,.(J.
~J?eiI~ DOREEN A. WILLIAMS
~. ~~ MY COMMISSION # DD 155602
~Oft\.l)" EXPIRES: October 14, 2006
HlOO.3-NOTARY FL Not8iy Service & Bonding, Inc.
....-
S:ll't.w./ni ~_ftCl.i4pp~"r/0t7 FIlnlI5(djlW:",","-TlllftllhflNtfTcollible d<i.-Mp""'nt ~IIM' WI/( ~~pllt;,rlrNr 2005,66t:
. .
PIg, 1 of' 7 - Rl!lllbr, OM_ent Comprc"emivl! Innl' AppnC.tlDII 201>5- Clty or C'BalWlrmr
e
e
Exhibit A
ORIGINAL
Brightwater Cove
Description of Request: To request an additional variance to previously approved
Development Order. The variance consists of a side setback ( east) approved at 7; and
inadvertently built to 6'
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A)
1. This site is located within the Small Motel district and was occupied by three (3)
small overnight accommodation uses consisting of 36 units. The land coverage
being requested is consistent with surrounding properties and in many cases, less
, than that of existing structures as this area consists of more intense uses such as
older, small, motels with little to no on-site parking. The three (3) story, nine-unit
residential townhome structure is consistent with the scale and bulk of adjacent
and surrounding residential properties and will be less intense than that of the
current overnight accommodation uses on site. The requested side setback
reduction although approved at 7' and built at 6' is still less intrusive than that of
the existing motel uses.
2. The proposed single-family townhome development has not hinqered or
discouraged redevelopment of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the
intent of the Beach by Design program for the Small Motel district. With the
construction of this upscale Key West style waterfront residential townhome use
and tropical landscaping, other surrounding property owners have been
encouraged to come closer into compliance with the intent of the Beach by
Design program. The "staggered" design of the proposed project lends to a "cove"
effect that will be aesthetically pleasing to passers-by and will be a significant
improvement to the surrounding community.
3. An additional 1 ' setback on the east side of the property will not adversely affect
the health or safety or persons residing or working the neighborhood of this
project.
4. The additional l' east side setback has not affect on traffic.
5. The side (east) setback even at 6' instead of the approved 5' is less intense than
existing developments in the surround area.
6. The proposed development will has not hindered the visual character of the
neighborhood, decreased surrounding property values nor been a negative impact
in regards to acoustics and olfactory issues
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. The additional l' variance on the east side of the property is necessary at this ,
point in time since the project is constructed. Unfortanately, the surveyor used
the incorrect site plan drawings to stake the property at time of the foundation
permit. This caused an encroachment on the east setback of an additional 1 foot.
1
e
e
ORIGINAL
2. The fair market value of abutting properties will not be affected by an additional
l' variance. Various projects in the surrounding area have similar or less
setbacks.
3. N/A
4. N/A
5. N/A
6. Asking for an additional l' variance on the east setback will neither upgrade nor
downgrade the immediate vicinity.
7. N/A
8. The additional l' east setback is consistent with surrounding developments.
9. N/A
10. The design of the proposed townhome building complies with the Tourist
DistrictlBeach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking has been
. provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The three-story
townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of this area to
two to four level townhouses and time shares above parking. The architecture is a
Key West style design and landscaping, tropical, which is aesthetically pleasing.
The residential design of the proposed project has created a sense of a "beach
community neighborhood" and the street level of this project has been made
pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all required visibility
triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-street parking also
lend to an aesthetically pleasing project in lieu of open parking areas and parking
within the right-of-way.
2
Nonhsile
&~ Sf!JW~ 1u.
e
CIViL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL .
TRANSPORT.ATION .
ORiGiNAL
May 5, 2005
Mr. Wayne Wells
City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: FLD2003-02007 /PL T2003-0000 1
130 Brightwater Drive
Dear Mr. Wells:
Enclosed herewith are tie-in surveys and revised site plans for the above mentioned project due
to an encroachment into the side ( east) setback.
The original approved drawings and Development Order dated April 17, 2003 stated that the east
setback shall be at 7' to the building, the tie-in survey reflects the east side of the building at 6'.
We request an amendment to the approved Development Order for the additional l'
encroachment into the east setback.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Cc: Roger's Beach Development
File
Ene. (15) Signed & Sealed Site Plans
(15) Tie-in Surveys
(15) Comprehensive Infill Application
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
,
.
?C}uvr. OOD JS
CITY OF CLEARWATER
APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. ZOd FLOOR
PHONE (721)-562-4567 FAX (721) 562-4865
.
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME
t1aJJ' t..~t-
:~a ,c.ult-~tzt<: ~.~ eh~~ ,~(pL_
"/17 - 91, cJ "] FAX NUMBER : ~ 4 r - 9 z,.5 f..p
but:...^/c:~~ LJlJtl L~
Z1J.L2 .JA1~7;./-hLJA6,(.. ~L -f t.
: .tj~ 7- Qt,.37 FAXNUMBER: 1/41- qtslJ
: J.!oUJ./ L!;,JdJAt It- du:tiJ-,-dL~~pj~~__J A:~
:/,DI ~Ltji-/~d.stdl;JL{i~~+JtJ3~
: ~ (J - Oll 9 FAXNUMBER: ~~. 8031.o
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
APPLICANTS NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
AGENT NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
( S'JIfirr;t:(d subscribed before me this/1i day of
L..A_ ____. A.D.,~ to me and/or
Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted.
The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale
not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following Information:
NORTH ARRON. SCALE AND DATE;
~,.,.Yl'~
:}M~ DOREEN A. WILLIAM
~/'t"'$ MY COMMISSION # 0 S
DF l\ \I EXPIFl. 0 155802
1-800-3-NOTARY Fl ES. October 14, 2006
Natll/}' Service & ....._~.
~ <<JIng, Inc.
Tm.E l.JM':lER WHICH 1liE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED;
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF 1liE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT;
IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STAllNG THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTlON. TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES;
EXISTlNG AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
PROPOSED STREET NAMES;
NAMES. APPROPRIATELY POSITlONED. OF ADJOINING PLATS;
Page I
!,
.
.
DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOlLOWING:
THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT
STREETS
RIGHTS-OF-WAY. INCLlDtNG RAOII OF CUL-DE-SACS;
COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY.
PaRe 2
.
.
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVEDlMr~'::--=--=--
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): _________
ATLAS PAGE #: ___~~~~..;:'"_'_'~__~_'.
ZONI NG DISTRICT: _-".~_..:._..:__________
LAND USE CLASStfICATiON: ____
SURROUNDING USES Or-ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH: _________________
SOUTH: __________________
VVEST:_________________
EAST: ____________________
.;^~
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans .
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE i-____
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEX~~;;e~;~~;?t~;;J:~:.vi~~;~~O~ TI0R' G\ NAL
- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -
A. APPLlCAN1~tROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAM4L'u~i:JJAf2L-~~/:.J-1i:~~I/1;LY.s___~t~___________________________
MAILING ADDRESSZf1f1__:n~~~_l:uL~ Z;-I-.J~fl&_1?L __~2C!.1_________
PHONE NUMBER: "'J;J_~~iZ~~l,_.3 7_________ FAX NUMBER: ;.xl~ '111- --!JZ51J--------------------
PROPERTYOVVNER~~~~~~~~--- _~_
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) ~ btIcJ MW. \..
--------~~-------------------------------------------------------------------
AGENT NAMENtlI.Sd-&Nu/hI,~_s;dJ~&A.I~-~U-1L4-AJ~------------
MAILING ADDRESS:~.tlL__e~tJL1A111_~ -t..__J. 9Jt)7-d ~lz..~__ ;:'___J.l1~~___________
PHONE NUMBER: '1L'1_~!Lc/J ~ ~ 9--------- FAX NUMBER:.'1.Ll::d4~___B_QJ IL_________________
CEll NUMBER: ~1~_ ..,f}J~_JJ-.f_b.____________ E-MAil ADDRESS: ~it~-~{iln1; ~ cbyDlt),J!"~ t! ;;~_
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREETADDRESS._~~~~__~~___~~______~_____~
lEGAL DESCRIPTION: It:J6_ ..sQ~~'Z..--dE _ 'Jl.dG...J...J~_f-_~~__~_"-________________-:-____
.1!,.n1)isJel"':1:1;,'l',/e no~p~ of this document in the submittal)
PARCEL NUMBER: ~~~;u:I~~ ~Q;l-fl:it"i:J.+-/26-~JJ____________________________
PARCEL SIZE: ~_~ '-A~M..J_______a~_~ '-_____________________________
(acres, s~are feet) I /
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S):tj_.t;p.;J~--~-iJ1iL..;...Ld1IAL-fJNk;X~--4~~-__-
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
~~~-----~~~ ---~ -:~~~~------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTIONOFREQUEST(S):_______~~______________________________________
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (Include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
-----------------------------------------------------------OBSOl-E'~E
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
.
eRIG1NAL
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED p'L~NNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ___ NO ___ (if yes, attach a copy Qf~ applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
CJ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY. DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
CJ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk. coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
-----:3/,-/.-- ~_i-~~~~ d~=~~~=~==~~~=~=~=~~~===~=~~~~~===~=~~~=~~~~=~
------------------------------------------------------------------lVr~~~On:r------------
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
Impair the value thereof.
-------~~~~~~------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
~-=~- ~L~=A~M ~~~===~~~==~=~==~~~~~~=~~~~=~_=~~~=~~~=~~~=~~~=~~~~=~
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
~~==~~~--~~~~-~------------------------------------------------------------------
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
~~=~-~~~~~~===~~=~====~~~~~=~=~==~~~==~=~~~=~~~=~~~~=~~~=~~~=~~~~=~
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
---------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------
--------~~--~~~~~~-----------------------------------------------------------
CJ Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
-----------------~ ---~~~-i'--------------------------------------------------------------
-------~~---~--~~~-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
.
. ORIGINAL
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
~=== 62L_A~~L(L~===~===~=~~==~=~~~==~=~=====~~==~=~~~=~
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
-----------------------~---------~----------------------------------------------~~~----~----~---
-----------&L--~~~~.J---------------------------------------_MA't-12-1OO5"--------
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
t....~l" '~,
~~~~==~~~~&A-" -;JL~~==~~~===-~~~==~======_ 00 ~~_______. ~:~__==_~=
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
----------------------~-----------------------------------------------~-~-------------------
L'~ A.hA_ ,~.
-------~~-~ --------------------------------------------------------------------
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
~=_~i~_A ti6~-d----------------------------------------------------------
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
-------~~---~~~~----------------------------------------------------------------
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Ciearwater as a whole.
~~-----:S~ A ~~ d _ -==~==~~===========~=~=~===~=~~==~
90 Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
-----------------------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------
-----~~~ ~ ~~~(!,----------------------------------------------------------------
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
==~~ ~~ A-~~ ~~==~=~=~=~====~~=~~~=====~~~~=__~==~~~~=~
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
.
.
ORIGINAL
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the
City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption t
this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
~~ minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: .
xisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
~ roposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
__ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ,
Proposed storm water detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
__ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
City manual.
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
MAY 1 2 2005
o COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
______ Stormwater plan as noted above is included
___ Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be
provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWA TER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
01GNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
~nCIUding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
~'r(' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
I:l GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4.202.A)
I:l SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all publiC and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
.
tt)RIG1NAL
o
~
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. MAY 2 2005
SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
~( Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
_ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
__ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
___ Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
o
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
~~
o
o
o
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures:
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered:
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
I rrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
.
e
ORIGINAL
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
K BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they wili be removed or
to remain.
\Qt'x'AII PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
~, ~hall include the street address (numerals)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
MAY } 2 2C05
Q Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
\. t)I on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
'" ~ Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
o Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
_____ Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
______ Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _____ day of
___________, A.D. 20____ to me and/or by
____________________, who is personally known has
produced ___________________________________ as
identification.
Signature of property owner or representative
Notary public,
My commission expires:
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
May 11 05 04:22p Ro~ers Beach &elopment
65/11/2aeS 15:16 72744&B~
7274499256
NORTHSIDE ENG svc~
p,1
PA(:i!:.. l:llHll
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
~~IM;, ~ ~.JJ :h~1r; i L~
(Nameso alllll'OllortvOWflel'll (In dlllld-IIQfe~INTJulln::g)
I 1. That rl5mJwe a'~lll1& owner(s) and rocol'li UUe holdll1(a) of II'le following described propert~ (addmu or gel1C1raIIOClllion):
t,JVJ .&u~~ [,L.
2. Thel ti'lia proPlIriy cOrlSlltules the proplll'ly fa, which . r9~lJII8t for 1I: (describe rl!q~
().JL RXl ~ ,lj.4-L~..J~ D...J ~ .11 db i=d~ 'J'UtJ. ill!J' /1
/vtA.I~'Jl. J o. c). 'r=: ;' ~ L'
I :3 That 1l'I.. undernianRri (1mlIIh~1nl~ _oln'lll'lllnd Ido..!tIl'l,,' IInonlnl: ~. ""J L~II~ ~Jt. ~r.ltt!l'v
Ibl/~w.t,JI.; ~.uJ(.~I.s,/"}~. ' .' . .. .-
11$ (h;,lthelrl all801(S) to ElXlICllfll any pelillor\$ or ct!Ier ocouments nllCllssilry 10 i1ffecllluch pelflion:
4, ThaI this afIldavit hu bIOl1I1t,;ec;:\Ited 10 Induce lhII City of Clearwaler. Florida to oon,lllllr ,"d acl on 1M aboll. d91Chbed ptep&rty;
5. That lilt, \Ils.ils Ie Ihe property $re neoeUll1Y bY ellV r.ll~nlAlhIll! in ordllr to Drocess this aollllall1on IInd IhA OWI'l'Ir S u1hori...... Otv
rtilp~"nlaIlV6S 10 viSll anCl phalOSirepl'lna proPl:lrt)' deScr!DGClln \hill appllcahDrI;
B. Tllat (I{we), lhe unlklrsrlJnld QUlhcl1ly. hGreby certify IhllI1he forClgclng I~ !NO llnd corred.
fr2
~roperty OWnar
Prcper1.y Owrl",r
l'roperl r OWIIlII'
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
PrOpllI'ty Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
.~~Yl',,~.
"'~r~ DOREEN A. WILLIAMS
"" ~ MY COMMISSION # DD 155802
"'1' ~
on~ll EXPIRES: October 14. 2006
1-800-3-NOTARY FL Nolaty SElfVice & Bonding, Inc.
(". ,""" ,
UKl \.)lr~J\',
S..IP!."""'i ~M~PPIff;,,*, FfK7JlS!dlt"",,,,",,,,,"t Il!'lIIto",IfhoIlJZMt .000000...."t ~w !rdIII ~1'fII",.,rIM 2005,d6t:
f'1I9' 7 of., - RBIlIbI, DewiClCllTlllnt ComprC"~ive Innll AppItCltlDrt lO05- CilY or crlla/WDtW
MAY 1 2 2005
.
..
.ORIGINAL
Exhibit A
Brightwater Cove
Description of Request: To request an additional variance to previously approved
Development Order. The variance consists ofa side setback (east) approved at 7' and
inadvertently built to 6'
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A)
1. This site is located within the Small Motel district and was occupied by three (3)
small overnight accommodation uses consisting of 36 units. The land coverage
being requested is consistent with surrounding properties and in many cases, less
than that of existing structures as this area consists of more intense uses such as
older, small, motels with little to no on-site parking. The three (3) story, nine-unit
residential townhome structure is consistent with the scale and bulk of adjacent
and surrounding residential properties and will be less intense than that of the
current overnight accommodation uses on site. The requested side setback
reduction although approved at 7' and built at 6' is still less intrusive than that of
the existing motel uses.
2. The proposed single-family townhome development has not hindered or
discouraged redevelopment of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the
intent of the Beach by Design program for the Small Motel district. With the
construction of this upscale Key West style waterfront residential townhome use
and tropical landscaping, other surrounding property owners have been
encouraged to come closer into compliance with the intent of the Beach by
Design program. The "staggered" design of the proposed project lends to a "cove"
effect that will be aesthetically pleasing to passers-by and will be a significant
improvement to the surrounding community.
3. An additional 1 ' setback on the east side of the property will not adversely affect
the health or safety or persons residing or working the neighborhood of this
project.
4. The additional 1 ' east side setback has not affect on traffic.
5. The side (east) setback even at 6' instead of the approved 5' is less intense than
existing developments in the surround area.
6. The proposed development will has not hindered the visual character of the
neighborhood, decreased surrounding property values nor been a negative impact
in regards to acoustics and olfactory issues
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. The additional l' variance on the east side of the property is necessary at this
point in time since the project is constructed. Unfortanately, due to either a
staking (foundation) setup error or a construction error, the east setback was
encroached upon by 1 additional foot. ~lAY ) 2 2005
1
.
.
2. The fair market value of abutting properties will not be affected by an additional
l' variance. Various projects in the surrounding area have similar or less
setbacks.
3. N/A
4. N/A
5. N/A
6. Asking for an additional l' variance on the east setback will neither upgrade nor
downgrade the immediate vicinity.
7. N/A
8. The additional l' east setback is consistent with surrounding developments.
9. N/A
10. The design ofthe proposed townhome building complies with the Tourist
District/Beach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking has been
provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The three-story
townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of this area to
two to four level townhouses and time shares above parking. The architecture is a
Key West style design and landscaping, tropical, which is aesthetically pleasing.
The residential design of the proposed project has created a sense of a "beach
community neighborhood" and the street level of this project has been made
pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all required visibility
triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-street parking also
lend to an aesthetically pleasing project in lieu of open parking areas and parking
within the right-of-way.
OR\G\NAL
v rv '.\ ~ ZSLS
t-;r,<!
2
Nonhsille
&H9bteeuft9 Se'UA~t 1He.
.
CIVIL.
LAN D PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
May 5, 2005
Mr. Wayne Wells
City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
ORIGINAL
RE: FLD2003-02007 IPL T2003-0000 1
130 Brightwater Drive
Dear Mr. Wells:
Enclosed herewith are tie-in surveys and revised site plans for the above mentioned project due
to an encroachment into the side (east) setback.
The original approved drawings and Development Order dated April 17, 2003 stated that the east
setback shall be at 7' to the building, the tie-in survey reflects the east side of the building at 6' .
We request an amendment to the approved Development Order for the additional l'
encroachment into the east setback.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
~ --A C:1tlM-?t~
Doreen A. Williams
Project Director
Cc: Roger's Beach Development
File
Ene. (15) Signed & Sealed Site Plans
(15) Tie-in Surveys
(15) Comprehensive Infill Application
.2f;j
t.::;;,
~
.~::;l
>-
-r:r,
~
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
Receipt #: 1200500000000004471
Date: 05/18/2005
5/18/2005
2:53:04PM
Line Items:
Case No
Tran Code
Description
Revenue Account No
Amount Paid
PL T2oo5-000 13
Preliminary Plat
010-341240
Line Item Total:
600.00
$600.00
Payments:
.
Method
Payer
Initials
Check No
Confirm No
How Received
Amount Paid
Check
ROGERS BEACH DEVLPT INC
R_D
1089
In Person
Payment Total:
600.00
$600.00
.
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
cReceipt.rpt
Page 1 of 1
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
PL T2005-00013
130 BRIGHTW ATER DR
Date Received: 05/18/2005
BRIGHTWATER COVE REPLAT
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
-
e
; ORIGINAL
.'~
FLD2003-02007 A
130 BRIGHTW A TER DR
Date Received: 05/05/2005
BRIGHTW ATER COVE TOWNHOMES., LL
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
MAY 1 2 2005
C L W CoverSheet
.>~,
,
.
CI'fY OF
CLEARWATER
.
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVlCES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
June 24, 2005
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case Nos. FLD2003-02007 A/PL T2003-0000 1
130 Brightwater Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On June 21, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for
(1) Flexible Development approval to permit nine attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to
the side (east) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, as an amendment to a previously approved
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted attached
dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to
seven feet and six feet, respectively, (to building), reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to
zero feet (to pavement) and 13 feet (to pool) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public
right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C]); and (2) Preliminary Plat for the replatting of nine townhome lots. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the applications with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Division 7, for SubdivisionslPlats;
4. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval: (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD2003-02007)
1. * That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. * That all Solid Waste Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. * That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of
the building with regards to color, materials and finish
4. * That all Fire Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
5. * That a tree survey be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BILL JOt\SOt\ , VICE-MAYOR
Hon HM.lILTON, COUNClLMEMBER
(@
Ii;;;!::)
JOHN DOR,\l\, COlit\CII.:-'lE\IIlER
CARLEN A. PETERSEt\, COl'I'ClL:-'lE:-'IIlER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVl, ACTION EMPLO\l:R"
.
.
June 24, 2005
Ghovaee - Page Two
6. * That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
7. * That a site plan indicating a sidewalk four feet in width within the right-of-way be submitted to and
approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
8. * That all required Transportation Impact Fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and
9.*That evidence of a SWFWMD permit be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of
any permits.
.~~,.,
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (June 21, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
; ,.~, ".
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on July 8, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner m, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.mvclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sinco~~' 0"" )_.
~~
Michael D~tikp
Planning Director
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)I/nactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater J 30 Brightwater Cove (T) - ApprovedlBrightwater
J 30 Development Order 6.24. 05. doc
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
June 11,2005
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case Nos. FLD2003-02007NPLT2005-
00013)
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Case Nos. FLD2003-02007NPLT2005-00013 for (1) Flexible Development approval to
permit nine attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10
feet to six feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project (Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted attached dwellings within
the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to seven feet
and six feet, respectively, (to building), reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero
feet (to pavement) and 13 feet (to pool) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C]); and (2) Preliminary Plat for the rep1atting of nine townhome lots, for property
located at 130 Brightwater Drive, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community
Development Board on June 21, 2005.
The meeting will take place at 1 :00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at
112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
~~~ l"\.W~
Wayne 1M. Wells, AICP
Planner III
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX (FLD)IPending cases I Up for the next CDBlBrightwater 130 Brightwater Cove (T) - Approved - 6.21.05
CDB - WWlBrightwater 130 6.21.05 CDB Letter.doc
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR
HOYT HAMILTON, COllNClLMEMIlER
*
JOHN DORAN, COlH\CILME~lBER
CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COllNCILMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Originals being mailed.
~
~
.
.
Wells, Wayne
Saturday, June 11, 2005 11 :32 AM
Doreen Williams (E-mail)
COB Letters
~
Brightwater 130 Bayway 706 Somerset 19-21
6.21.05 COB Le... <.21.05 COB Letter... 6.21.05 COB Let...
1
Nonhsile
&~ s~ 1~,
LETTER OF TRANSMITTA
Date:
To:
Attention:
Reference:
May 18, 2005
City of Clearwater Planning Depart
100 S. Myrtle Ave. #210
Clearwater, FL 33756
Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst
Brightwater Cove
NES Prj#302
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) UPS Overnight
() Pick-up ()Courier
(X) Per Your Request 0 For Your Review & Comment
() For Your Use 0 For Your Approval
() For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies
15
1
Date
12/18/2005
12/18/2005
Description
15 Plat applications
1 check for $600
.
CIVIL.
LAN D PLANNING ·
ENVI RON MENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
~( ~C~'~;jrn
I --=- -
r,,:y,:; OPMENT ~
HE O' go~.' HOi)!) .SER iCES
t y O..~~~'l t. U.1i IV A E R
( ) Originals
(X)Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
o Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
Please contact us at (727)-443-2869 should you have any questions or comments.
By:
Copies To: File
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
y
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wells, Wayne
Tuesday, May 17, 2005 3:14 PM
Doreen Williams (E-mail)
FLD2003-02007 A, 130 Brightwater Drive
Doreen -
Now that the Plat is being amended/replatted, need to submit a completed Preliminary Plat application (one original + 14
copies), plus the $600 application fee. Need to submit ASAP (no later than noon on Wednesday, May 18, 2005). Thanks.
Wayne
1
Nonhsille
&~ s~ 11te,
41". ... _
.. -_
ORIGINAL
~.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING ·
ENVI RON MENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
.~
- -
:'.~; .. .-"'.;~.' 1; ..
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: May 17, 2005
RECE\\}EO
M~~ 1 7 20U~
PLANN\NG DEPARlMENl
C\1V Of ClfAQWA1ER
To:
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.., #210
Clearwater, Fla. 33756
Attn.:
Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst
Reference: Brightwater Cove
NES Comm.: 0302
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
( ) Originals
( ) Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
(X)Per Your Request () For Your Review & Comment
(X) For Your Use (X) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
15 5/17/2005 Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill
Applications
15 5/17/2005 Plats
15 5/17/2005 Building Elevations
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this project.
Copies To: file
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
LL
.
f
..
o
>-
f-
()
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: Ye~~ N~\\\~
FAX: "A-~ 'tJ. ~t> 3 to,
Phone: 4-4-3 . Z-t> ~ 9
FROM: ~'N-.. WQ\\:s
DA TE:~ s-, r~ \) S'
Phone:2lo 2- -=-!SO 4-
RE: 1.3 D 15 r \) ht-&-V~i-u- -1>1"'.
KD'-Ao') - 0 z.OOi A
MESSAGE:
j 2.0 ur,
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) L
':::B III I t 1CJ F'EF'I]F'T
.
.
~
Ma~. 12 2005 02:25PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO.
Cit~OfClearwater-Plan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE
01 94468036
START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
May. 12 02:24PM 01'04 SND 02 OK
TO Tl.R-I CFF REPrnT, PRESS 'I"EI'IJ' 004.
llEN SELECT CFF BY US I t-I3 '+' CR ' -' .
FCR FAX AJ)I..A{fI=fiE RSS I STl=tO:, PLEASE CALL l-IDH-ELP-FAX (435-7329).
~
. .
Conditions Associated With
FLD2003-02007 A
130 BRIGHTWATER DR
.
","11#"'11
,I~C: III ., If/: .....
ls:y~. ......Ih:.~....~. . ..........
.~~~~,llJ<_,~@
:". :' '-~~
':.~~ . ~f~
':.~\... ." ~
~~~~~II.,.I~'
........,~TE\\,ji'lj.,
"1
?oning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
05/12/200!ijl Revise the application to indicate the owner and applicant to be Brightwater Cove LLC. (not
tv Brightwater Cove Townhomes LLC).
05/12/200f(!) Provide at least the front building elevation sheet (15 copies).
05/12/200~ Exhibit A to the application, in the response to Comp Infill #1, it states that the reason for the error
~ is "either a staking (foundation) setup error or a construction error." Please be more difinitive,
what was the cause of the error.
05/12/200(1) Will need to amend the Plat for Brightwater Cove, due to the reduced east setback.
L....;
Print Date: 05/12/2005
Page 1 of 1
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
Northsille
&~ s~ 1H(;,
~~C03-.
b aCOrp\ .
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: May 5,2005
To:
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle
Clearwater, FI 33756
Attn: Sherry Watkins / Wayne Wells
Reference: FLD2003-02007
130 Brightwater Drive
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING ·
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
ORIGINAL
( ) Originals
(X) Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
( ) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
We Transmit: () Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
( ) Per Your Request () For Your Review & Comment
() For Your Use (X) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
15 5/5/05
15 5/5/05
15 5/5/05
15 5/5/05
1 5/5/05
Comments:
File
D en A. Williams
Project Director
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
.,
.1;
J
Ln
C)
C)
C".I
~
o
~.
~;
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Numbers:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
..,'''~.~'
.
.
ORIGINAL
June 21. 2005
FLD2003-02007 A/PL T2005-000 13
F1
Brightwater Cove Townhomes LLC
Housh Ghovaee. Northside Engineering Services. Inc.
130 Brightwater Drive
rae'"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE:
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USE:
ADJACENT ZONING/
LAND USES:
(1) Flexible Development approval to permit nine attached
dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to six feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Re-
development Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, as an
amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevel-
opment Project (Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted at-
tached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the
side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to seven feet and six feet,
respectively, (to building), reduction in the rear (north) setback from
20 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and 13 feet (to pool) and to permit
parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions
of Section 2-803.C]); and (2) Preliminary Plat for the replatting of
nine townhome lots.
Tourist (T) District; Resort Facilities High (RFH) Category
0.52 acres; 22,655 square feet
Current Use: Attached dwellings (nine townhomes)
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (nine townhomes)
North: Preservation District; Clearwater Harbor
West: Tourist District; Attached dwellings
East: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations
South: Tourist District; Attached dwellings
Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005
Cases FLD2003-02007A1PLT2005-00013 - Page 1 of 6
.
e
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses dominate the
immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: This 0.52-acre site is located on the north side of
Brightwater Drive, approximately 500 feet east of Harnden Drive. On April 15, 2003, the
Community Development Board (CDB) approved the development of this site for nine townhome
attached dwellings, with various reductions. On February 24, 2004, building permits were issued
to construct the site and building improvements. The site and building improvements have been
constructed. A tie-in survey was submitted May 4,2005. It carne to the attention of the City after
the tie-in survey was submitted that the building was located one-foot closer to the east property
line than originally approved (six-foot setback rather than a seven-foot setback). The applicant has
submitted this application in an effort to correct the location oversight.
Also on April 15, 2003, the CDB approved Preliminary Plat PLT2003-0000l for the nine
townhome lots and a common area. This plat for Brightwater Cove was recorded February 20,
2004, in Plat Book 127, Pages 76-77. A replat of this subdivision was recorded as Brightwater
Cove No.2 April 7, 2005, in Plat Book 129, Pages 62-63, eliminating the common area. The
CDB has not approved the requisite Preliminary Plat, pursuant to Section 4-702. This application
has been submitted to correct this procedural oversight.
Proposal: The proposal is to legitimize the location of the townhome building as it has been
constructed at an east side setback of six feet, rather than the seven feet originally approved. The
applicant has indicated there was a surveying error, utilizing an incorrect site plan drawing, to
stake out the property for the building location. The change in location from the east property line
is not perceptible generally to the surrounding area, as the west side setback was originally
approved at six feet and constructed to this setback.
The proposed Preliminary Plat provides that unit lot lines run from the front to the rear property
lines, eliminating the prior common areas, and includes easements for the common elements and
utilities. Section 4-702 sets out the Required Approvals of subdivision plats, requiring Preliminary
and Final Plats, and is intended to be processed simultaneously with other required approvals.
City Council must approve the Final Plat prior to recordation. Approval of this Preliminary Plat
will correct the procedural oversight of the approval and recordation of the Final Plat prior to the
CDB approval.
The building and site improvements were originally found to be compatible with the surrounding
area. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General
Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria
(Section 2-803.C), as well as Article 4, Division 7 for Subdivisions/Plats, have been met.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005
Cases FLD2003-02007A1PLT2005-00013 - Page 2 of 6
.
e
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
DENSITY Nine dwelling units X
(30 dwelling units per
acre maximum) (15
units maximum)
IMPERVIOUS 0.69 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (0.95 maximum)
LOT AREA (5,000 - 0.52 acres; 22,655 square feet X
10,000 square feet
minimum)
LOT WIDTH (50 - 192 feet X
100 feet minimum)
FRONT SETBACK South: 13 feet (to building) X
(zero - 15 feet
minimum)
SIDE SETBACK (0 - East: six feet (to building) X*
10 feet minimum) West: six feet (to building)
REAR SETBACK (10 North: 28 feet (to building); zero feet X
- 20 feet minimum) (to boardwalk/patio)
HEIGHT (35 -100 35 feet (as measured from base flood X
feet maximum) elevation of 11 feet)
PARKING SPACES 18 spaces (two per dwelling unit) X
(1.5 spaces per unit
required)
*See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005
Cases FLD2003-02007A/PLT2005-000l3 - Page 3 of 6
.
.
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL CRITERIA (Section 2-803.C):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
3. The use or mIX of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X
Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses.
4. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
6. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
8. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X
guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913 :
Consistent Inconsistent
1. X
2. X
3. X
4. X
5. of the X
6. X
Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005
Cases FLD2003-02007A1PLT2005-00013 - Page 4 of 6
.
.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject 0.52-acre site is zoned Tourist (T) District;
2. On April 15, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the Flexible
Development application for the development of this site for nine townhome attached
dwellings, with various reductions, with the Preliminary Plat and nine conditions of
approval;
3. The townhome building has been substantially constructed in accordance with approved
plans, with the exception of the previously approved east setback;
4. The reduction of setback to six feet from the east property line for the building is not
perceptible generally to the surrounding area, as the west side setback was originally
approved at six feet and constructed to this setback; and
5. The approval of the proposed Preliminary Plat will match that recorded in the public
records.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C;
2. Staff concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria
per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code;
3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Article
4, Division 7, for SubdivisionslPlats; and
4. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends approval of this application.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee originally reviewed the application and supporting materials
on March 13, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible
Development application to permit nine attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, as an amendment to a previously approved
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted
attached dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks
from 10 feet to seven feet and six feet, respectively, (to building), reduction in the rear (north)
setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and 13 feet (to pool) and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C]); and (2) Preliminary Plat for the replatting of nine
townhome lots for the site at 130 Brightwater Drive, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005
Cases FLD2003-02007A1PLT2005-00013 - Page 5 of 6
.
.
3. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Division 7, for
SubdivisionslPlats;
4. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval: (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD2003-02007)
1. * That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. * That all Solid Waste Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
3.* That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the
design of the building with regards to color, materials and finish
4. * That all Fire Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
5. * That a tree survey be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. * That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
7. * That a site plan indicating a sidewalk four feet in width within the right-of-way be submitted to
and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
8. * That all required Transportation Impact Fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and
9.* That evidence of a SWFWMD permit be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the
issuance of any permits.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
~ M,W
Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBrightwater 130 Brightwater Cove (1) - Approved - 6.21.05
CDB - WW\Brightwater 130 Staff Report Amendedfor 6.21.05 CDB.doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 21, 2005
Cases FLD2003-02007 AlPL T2005-000 13 - Page 6 of 6
.."._11:#.,#
..
t~."
.l
...~,..."I"J,:, ,/ ., ...
~~{" '.'.~..""'. .~~
':-""'A. .w ~e:
~~a.., ..... ,.' ~
...3'~3""""~.
......... TE\'\:J'"
., '''''11.
· Conditions Associated Wit~
FLD2003-02007 A
130 BRIGHTWATER DR
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
05/13/2005 Revised plans and stormwater calculations are required to show the open space is still being met. Not Met
There is now an area which was indicated as open behind the building between the patios and the
pool deck or the 5' sidewalk to the pool area with a note on sheet "C3. 1" stating "MINIMIAl
STEPPING STONES Will BE USED TO CONNECT INDIVIDUAL UNITS TO POOL DECK
AREA." In the survey submitted this area is filled in with concrete.
CaseConditons
Print Date: 06/11/2005
Page 1 of 1
.
.
Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 6:23 AM
To: 'Nick Fri'
Subject: RE: 130 Brightwater
Nick -
The construction of the subject building has been completed. The issue is that the east setback is a foot closer to
the property line than previously approved. Unfortunately, this error was recently caught. The drawings
submitted to the COB were those site plans that showed the "new" proposed setback. Those building elevations
submitted were to allow the newer COB members to know what the building looked like. Since the issue was the
setback error and the building has been completed, we did not think floor plans were necessary to be submitted
for review.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Fri [mailto:natbeach@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: 130 Brightwater
Hi Wayne, I did not find the plan view for the living areas in the packet. Is that an ovesight?
Thanks, Nick
6/2112005
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Wells, Wayne
Saturday, June 11,200512:35 PM
Delk, Michael
Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil
Plats
Section 4-702 sets out the Required Approvals of subdivision plats, requiring Preliminary and Final Plats, and is intended
to be processed simultaneously with other required approvals. For those plats requiring Level One approval, the
Preliminary Plat is approved by City staff. For those plats where the use of the property requires Level Two approval by
the COB, the Preliminary Plat is approved by the COB. In both cases, the City Council must approve the Final Plat prior to
recordation. Final Plat approval/recordation must be obtained prior to the issuance of building permits for vertical
improvements.
I am processing PL T2005-00013 for 130 Brightwater Drive to the COB for the June 21, 2005, agenda, in conjunction with a
setback oversight for FLD2003-02007 A. There appears to be an internal processing issue with this property, as a new plat
has already been approved by City Council and recorded, without the requisite COB approval. This oversight would
appear to indicate City staff is not following the Code adopted by City Council. I am unclear where this oversight occurred.
Engineering processes Final Plats to the City Council and for recordation.
I have not yet talked to anyone in Engineering regarding this oversight in process. Any thoughts?
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Wells, Wayne
Saturday, June 11, 2005 12:35 PM
Delk, Michael
Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil
Tie-in Surveys
I am processing a setback oversight under FLD2003-02007 A for 130 Brightwater Drive to the COB for the June 21, 2005,
agenda, in conjunction with a plat oversight for PL T2005-00013. The tie-in survey was submitted to the City on May 4,
2005, after the building was significantly completed. The building is one-foot too close to the property line than approved
by the COB under FLD2003-02007 and by staff though the review of building permits.
It is my understanding, and I have seen the Policy Memo #02.2 from Kevin Garriott (revised November 21,2001),
regarding the requirement for a tie-in survey "once the foundation is in place and the lowest floor is established (not
necessary for slab to be poured)." This policy also states that there will be no inspections performed after the foundation
without the tie-in survey being accepted. No tie-in survey was submitted in accordance with this Policy, nor were
inspections denied for non-compliance with this Policy.
This is the second case I have recently processed to the COB for setback errors, too late to relocate the building. The
COB must approve the request (or a big saw must be used to remove the offending encroachment). My concern is that
the Planning Department must prepare the necessary Staff Report for this error and stand in front of the COB to answer
any questions regarding this oversight. There appears to be an internal lack of oversight.
I have not yet talked to anyone in Development Services regarding this oversight in process. Any thoughts?
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:30 AM
Wells, Wayne
fld2006-02007 A
Importance:
High
~
FLD2003-02007 A
130 Brightwater...
Wayne, Here is a set of labels that needs to be saved to the case the only one that I found was the Org. case I wasn't sure
if you wanted me to save it to that case? HELP
Please let me know how to handle for the next time.
Sherry
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kader, Art
Thursday, May 19, 20054:59 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: PL T2005-00013 - Replat for 130 Brightwater Drive
No Issues from Parks and Recreation
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 200S S:49 PM
To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art;
Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry
Subject: PLT200S-00013 - Replat for 130 Brightwater Drive
DRC Members-
Case FLD2003-02007 A has been scheduled for the June 21, 2005, COB meeting due to the constructed building not
meeting the side (east) setback approved by the COB. During my review, I also looked at the recorded plat for this
development. I questioned the applicant whether there was a problem with the plat. Well, apparently there might be.
Therefore, they have submitted a Replat application, which basically gets rid of common area in lieu of running the
townhome lot lines from the front to the rear property lines (PL T2005-00013). Please look at this Preliminary Plat and let
me know of any issues that need to be resolved.
Please note that I will not be in the office and will return on May 31,2005.
Thanks -
Wayne
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Albee, Rick
Monday, May 23, 2005 4:27 PM
Wells, Wayne
RE: PL T2005-00013 - Replat for 130 Brightwater Drive
No Issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 5:49 PM
To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art;
Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Reynolds, Mike; Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins,
Sherry
Subject: PL T2005-00013 - Replat for 130 Brightwater Drive
DRC Members -
Case FLD2003-02007 A has been scheduled for the June 21,2005, COB meeting due to the constructed building not
meeting the side (east) setback approved by the COB. During my review, I also looked at the recorded plat for this
development. I questioned the applicant whether there was a problem with the plat. Well, apparently there might be.
Therefore, they have submitted a Replat application, which basically gets rid of common area in lieu of running the
townhome lot lines from the front to the rear property lines (PL T2005-00013). Please look at this Preliminary Plat and
let me know of any issues that need to be resolved.
Please note that I will not be in the office and will return on May 31, 2005.
Thanks -
Wayne
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Wells, Wayne
Wednesday, May 18, 2005 5:49 PM
Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Dittmer, Arden; Dougall-Sides, Leslie;
Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Reynolds, Mike;
Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry
PL T2005-00013 - Replat for 130 Brightwater Drive
Subject:
DRC Members -
Case FLD2003-02007 A has been scheduled for the June 21, 2005, CDB meeting due to the constructed building not
meeting the side (east) setback approved by the CDB. During my review, I also looked at the recorded plat for this
development. I questioned the applicant whether there was a problem with the plat. Well, apparently there might be.
Therefore, they have submitted a Replat application, which basically gets rid of common area in lieu of running the
townhome lot lines from the front to the rear property lines (PL T2005-00013). Please look at this Preliminary Plat and let
me know of any issues that need to be resolved.
Please note that I will not be in the office and will return on May 31,2005.
Thanks -
Wayne
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Watkins, Sherry
Friday, May 13, 2005 9:24 AM
DRC Members
FW: Resubmittals for June 21,2005 COB
I have placed one of each cases of these cases on the back shelf near ROOM 216 Please review by Tuesday May 17,
2005by 4pm
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 9:04 AM
To: Planning
Subject: Resubmittals for June 21, 2005 COB
Good Morning,
Yesterday was resubbmittal for COB here are the following cases that were submitted.
1. FLD2005-02021 - 325 S. Gulfview - Mark Parry
2. FLD2005-03028 - 2077 E Palmetto - Mark Parry
3. FLD2005-03032 - 657 Bay Esplanade - Mark Parry
4. FLD2005-03026 - 1871 Kings Hwy - Mark Parry
5.FLD2005-03030 - 2155 Montclair Road - Mark Parry
6. LUZ2005-03004 - 137 Fernwood Avenue - Mark Parry
7. FLD2005-03031 - 706 Bayway Blvd - Wayne Wells
8. FLD2003-02007A - 130 Brightwater - Wayne Wells
9. FLD2005-01006 - 19 Sommerset - Wayne Wells
10. FLD2005-02017 - 18419 US Hwy 19 - Wayne Wells
11. FLD2005-03025 - 1860 Fort Harrison - Wayne Wells
12. ANX2005-03007 - 2346 Ella Place - Michael (PPC)
13. ANX2005-03008 - 2300 Drew Street - Michael (PPC)
14. ANX2005-03009 - 2077 Palmetto Street - Michael (PPC)
A set will be given to you shortly.
Thank you,
Sherry Watkins
Planning Department
Administrative Analyst
1
(
Di,~sion of Corporations
.
.
Page 1 of2
Florida Limited Liability
BRIGHTWATER COVE, LLC
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
140 ISLAND WAY
SUITE #193
CLEARWATERFL 33767 US
Changed 03/29/2005
MAILING ADDRESS
140 ISLAND WAY
SUITE # 193
CLEARWATER FL 33767 US
Changed 03/29/2005
Document Number
L03000003219
FEI Number
200962784
Date Filed
01/28/2003
State
FL
Status
ACTIVE
Effective Date
01/28/2003
Total Contribution
0.00
R
t dA t
egIS ere .gen
I Name & Address I
SHEPPARD, PATRICK J
140 ISLAND WAY
SUITE #193
CLEARWATER FL 33767
I Address Changed: 03/29/2005 I
M
1M b D t .1
anager em er e aI
I Name & Address II Title I
SHEPPARD, PATRICK G
140 ISLAND WAY SUITE #193
CLEARWATER FL 33767
http://www.sunbiz.orglscripts/cordet.exe?a1 =DETFIL&n1 =L03000003219&n2=NAMFW... 5/12/2005
Dil..lsion of Corporations
.
.
Page 2 of2
Annual Reports
Report Year II Filed Date
2004 II 04/25/2004
2005 II 03/29/2005
Previous Filing RetumtoList ..1
No Events
NoN ame History Information
NextFiling... .1
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.
03/29/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT
04/25/2004 -- ANNUAL REPORT
01/28/2003 -- Florida Limited Liability
THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1 =DETFIL&n1 =L03000003219&n2=NAMFW... 5/1212005
PiIJellas County Property APp.er Information: 0829 15 11489000 O.
Page 2 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 11489 / 000 / 0040
12-Hay-2005 Jil'"l Sl'"Iith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 13:31:13
Ownership Inforl'"lation Uacant P rope rty Use and Sal.e!i
BRIGHTWATER COUE LLC OBK: U112 OPG: 2091
101 SPOTTIS WOODE LN
CL EARWATER FL 33156-5261
EVACUATION ZONE: A
COl'"lparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Trac t: .00
sales frol'"l 2002 - 2004:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) vac/Il'"lp
Plat Inforl'"lation 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2004: Book 121 Pgs 016-011 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( )
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Jus t / Marke t: 141.000 HOl'"lestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exel'"l: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 141.000 Institutional Exel'"l: NO Tax Exel'"lpt %: .000
Historic Exel'"l: 0
Taxable: 141.000 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Inforl'"lation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Cl.earlllater View:
04 Mi llage : 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes: 3.238.69
1) 0 x 0 115.000.00 1. 00 T
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Hol'"les 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3.238.69 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exel'"lptions,
2004 taxes will be :
3.238.69
Short Legal BRIGHTWATER COUE LOT 4
Description L
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi -c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&... 5/12/2005
Pivellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 11489000 O.
Page 3 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 11489 / 000 / 0040
lZ-Hay-Z005 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser
Vacant Parcel Property Use: Z33 Land Use: 00
13:31:01
Vacant Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VA LU E : 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][!]~g]
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&... 5/12/2005
Pipellas County Property APp.er Information: 0829 15 11489000 O.
Page 4 of5
~
r-659 101
L- ~
r-:::- 4 4 - I
fJE,/ch*
C.J ~~
/..--- r- - ,
/ 11489"*
/ L..-J
I --,--
/
r- -,
I 36;98" I
I
134
R "H1W ~ E,
DR
150
RIGHTW,A1E ,I
OR
E
1
I 1
135
R HE!: ~
OR
E,
/
r- -r- I
0(:::4" 4' c.."*
L..:: ....... _ ....) ~
L
~c:.'-' - ",I
l-) \Cj~B\I*
"-. .....~.J \...".. -A .....-'
L-.: _ ~
-
-
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&... 5/1212005
Pipellas County Property APp.er Information: 0829 15 11489000 O.
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/cgi -click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&... 5/12/2005
.
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public
hearings on Tuesday, June 21, 2005, beginning at 1 :00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in
City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following
requests:
NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the
meetine:. Those cases that are not contested bv the applicant, staff, neie:hborine: property
owners, etc. will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved bv a sine:le vote at the
bee:innine: of the meetine:.
1. (Cont from 05-17-05) Skiff Point of Clearwater, LLC is requesting Flexible Development
approval to permit 15 attached dwelling units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25
ft to 15 ft to building and from 25 ft to 3 ft to pavement; a reduction to the side (north and south)
setbacks from 10 ft to 6.5 ft to building and 5 ft to parking; a reduction to the rear (south) setback
from 15 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 5 ft to pool and 7.5 ft to parking; and an increase in height from
30 ft to 49 ft to roof deck and additional 4 ft for parapet (from roof deck to top of parapet) and an
additional 16 ft for elevator overrun (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, in the Island
Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD)/Medium High Density
Residential (MHDR) District under the provisions of Sec. 2-404.F and 2-1602. C and H.
(Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (15 dwelling units) at 200 and 201 Skiff Point, Island
Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A, Lots 35 & 36. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting
Planner. FLD2005-01012
2. Brie:htwater Cove, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 9
attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to
building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-
803.C, as an amendment to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted attached dwellings within the Tourist District with
reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 ft to 7 ft and 6 ft, respectively, (to
building), reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and 13 ft (to
pool) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C]); and (2)
Preliminary Plat for the replatting of 9 townhome lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (9
townhomes)] at 130 Brie:htwater Dr, Brightwater Cove No.2, Lot 1. Assigned Planner:
Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-02007A/PLT2005-00013
3. Del Mar Development. LLC (Rob Szasz) are requesting Flexible Development approval to
permit a 322.5 sq-ft addition to a previously approved 497 sq-ft multi-use dock for a total of 14
slips (10 existing; 4 proposed), under the provisions of Sec. 3-601. (Proposed Use: Dock
addition to a condominium project) at 1860 N Ft Harrison Ave, Villa Del Mar of Clearwater
Condo Unit 106. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-03025
4. Clearwater Retail Partners. LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit
retail sales and services with a reduction to the front (west along US Highway 19 N) setback from
25 ft to 17.17 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5.59 ft (to
building) and from 10 ft to 9.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft
to 5.21 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pavement),
increases to building height of an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof
.
.
deck at 18.67-ft height) and an additional 13.83 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof
deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street (US Highway 19 N), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C; and a
reduction to the interior landscaping requirement from 10 percent to 6.8 percent, as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use:
Retail sales and services (7,350 sq ft) at 18419 US Hwv 19 N, Sec. 20-29-16, M&B 33.04.
Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-02017
5. Adelheid Hanehofer & Ocean Breeze. LLC are requesting (1) Flexible Development
approval to permit 14 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)
District and the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to lot area in the MHDR District from 15,000
sq ft to 8,700 sq ft and in the T District from 10,000 sq ft to 8,700 sq ft, a reduction to lot width in
the MHDR District from 150 ft to 100 ft, reductions to the front (north along Somerset Street) in
the MHDR District from 25 ft to 13.67 ft (to building) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging
area) and in the T District from 15 ft to 13.67 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along
Mandalay Avenue) in the T District from 15 ft to 10 ft (to building), an increase to building
height in the MHDR District from 30 ft and in the T District from 35 ft to 50.25 ft (to roof deck)
with perimeter parapets of 5.25 ft (from roof deck) and rooftop, open pavilions of 11.75 ft (from
roof deck) and to allow a building within the required sight visibility triangles, as a Residential
Infill Project in the MHDR District, under the provisions of Sec. 2-404.F and 2-803.B; (2)
Reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area),
as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G; and (3) Transfer
of Development Rights (TDR2005-01016) of 2 dwelling units to this site from 200 Brightwater
Dr, under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (14
condominiums)] at 19 & 21 Somerset St, Clearwater Beach Rev Blk 2, lots 6-9. Assigned
Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-01006/TDR2005-01016
6. Warner Hospitality. Scott A Warner. & Patricia A Kellan (Newkirk Ventures, Inc.) are
requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling
units; 16 attached dwelling units proposed), under the provisions of Sec. 6-109; and (2) Flexible
Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south)
setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to
the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7.8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement),
reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.5 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 5.3 ft (to
pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to building and pavement)
and an increase to building height from 35 ft to 87.3 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of
5.67 ft (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached
dwellings (16 condominiums)] at 706 Bavwav Blvd, Bel Crest Condo Units 1 & 17. Assigned
Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-03031
7. Clara & Dorothv Boldoe. Americana Gulf Motels. Ltd. Ptr. Lucca Development. LLC.
Thomas J & Stasia Wilk. & US-Euro- Trade. Inc. are requesting Flexible Development
approval to permit attached dwellings in the Tourist District (Parcels A and B) and an increase in
height from 30 ft to 148 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel A), an
increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches (2.5 ft) to 7 ft (Parcel B), permit a building
within the required sight visibility triangles along Coronado Drive and 5th Street and an increase
in height from 30 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck) (Parcel B) as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C., a
Termination of the status of a nonconformity (equivalent of 119 hotel units [116 hotel units and 3
dwelling units] where 93 hotel units are permitted) within the Tourist District under the
provisions of Sec. 6-l09.C (Parcels A, B and C), Preliminary Plat and a Transfer of Development
.
.
Rights (TDR2005-03020) of 18 hotel units from 401 Coronado/406 Harnden Drives (donor site)
to 325 South Gulfview Blvd (receiver site - Parcels A, Band C) under the provisions of Sec. 4-
1402 and 4-1403. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (102 units)] at 325 S Gulfview Blvd. 326.
345. 347 & 353 Coronado Dr. & 346 Harnden Dr, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 63-66, &
112-117, Columbia Sub No 2 Blk A, Lots 12-14, & Collumbia Sub No 3 Lots 8, 9 & 9A.
Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-02021/TDR2005-
03020/PL T2005-0001 0
8. Harold Barian (Dave Smart) are requesting Flexible Development approval to reduce the
front (north) setback from 25 ft to 17 ft (to pavement), under the provisions of Sec. 2-404, to
reduce the front (north) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 7 ft and reduce the front (west) landscape
buffer from 10ft to 5 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provision of
Sec. 3-1202.G. and a Preliminary Plat. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 townhome
units)] at 1413 Sunset Pt Rd & 1871 Kin!!s Hwy, Brentwood Estates Lots B & C. Assigned
Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-03026/PLT2005-00009
9. Beach & Gulf Sands. Inc.. & North Clearwater Beach Development (Anthony Menna) are
requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist District
and an increase in height from 35 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof
deck), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, permit 2 parking
spaces within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade, a reduction in the front
(north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and 3 ft (to trash staging area), reduction in the
side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), 10 ft (to pool) and 7 ft (to building),
reduction in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area) and a reduction the
rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 8 ft (to pool) and 10 ft (to building), as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C.,
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-030 19) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr
(donor site) to 657 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402 and 4-1403
and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Sec. 6-109.
[Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (13 condominium units)] at 657 & 663 Bav Esplanade,
Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting
Planner. FLD2005-03032/TDR2005-03019
10. Beckett Lake Lod!!e is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the transfer of 1
dwelling unit (TDR2005-04021) from the portion of the subject site within the Preservation (P)
district and Preservation (P) future land use plan (FLUP) category to a portion of the site within
the Medium Density Residential (MDR) district and Residential Low Medium (RLM) FLUP
category under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402 - 1403 and to allow an assisted living facility on the
site located at 2271 Montclair Rd as a Residential Infill Project without fronting on a major
arterial street approved by the Community Development Board on March 21, 2000) by expanding
the number of beds from 144 beds to 180 beds, reduce the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 23
ft, not providing a landscaped wall or fence which will screen parking from adjacent parcels of
land as required by Sec. 3-304.A.2 and a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from
90 spaces (1 space per 2 residents) to 72 spaces (1 space per 2.5 residents), as a Residential Infill
Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-304.G.. (Proposed Use: 180-bed Assisted Living Facility)
at 2155 Montclair Rd, Sec. 01-29-15, M&B 14.01. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry,
Consulting Planner FLD2005-03030
11. Boos Development Group. Inc (Boos Florida Development, LLC, Robert B Boos) are
requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a fence\wall 6 ft in height within the front
(north and south) setbacks along East Palmetto and Marilyn Streets, respectively on a property
.
.
within the Medium High Density Residential District (MHDR) (pending case ANX2005-03009),
under the provisions of Sec. 3-804.A.1. (Proposed Use: 144 attached dwellings) at 2077 E
Palmetto St & 2093 Palmetto St, Pinellas Groves SE 1/4, Lots 3-4, 12-14, & Part of Lot 5.
Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner FLD2005-03028
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or
objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file
written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the
hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with
respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings
and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per
Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall
be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates
that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence,
argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration
requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB.
An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public
hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and
spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB
shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the
Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be
available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL
33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about
the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
Michael Delk
Planning Director
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
A COPY OF TillS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST.
Ad: 06/05/05
',-
ww
e
BAUSTERT, DELBERT V
BAUSTERT, MARY LOU
PO BOX 3128
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8128
FLD2003-02007 A (57'\
BARROWS, S'COTT 0 e BASKIN, H H EST
BARROWS, JUDY L OWENS, W D EST
130 BAYSIDE DR 516 N FT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905
BELLE AQUA VILLAS LLC
PO BOX 4189
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189
BRIGHTWATER COVE LLC
701 SPOTTIS WOODE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5267
Brightwater Cove, LLC
200 Brightwater Dr, #2
Clearwater, FL 33767
BRIGHTWATER ON THE BAY INC BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLAW CANNEY, SCOTTW
175 BRIGHTWATER DR BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA 314 WESTERN AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2411 345 HAM DEN DR ALLEGAN MI 49010 - 1241
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450
CAPPELLO, LISA A CIEZCZAK, CHESTER CIUS, MIECZYSLAW W
CAPPELLO, JOSEPH A CIEZCZAK, MARIA CIUS, MARIA
146 BAYSIDE DR 158 BRIGHTWATER DR 162 BRIGHTWATER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
Clearwater Beach Association Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition CLEARWATER TOWNHOMES INC
Jay Keyes Doug Williams, President 7087 GRAND NATIONAL DR # 100
100 Devon Drive 2544 Frisco Drive
Clearwater, FL 33767 Clearwater, FL 33761 ORLANDO FL 32819 - 8316
CONTI, CAMILLO CZAICKI, EDWARD GIOTAKIS, CHRIS B
CONTI, LIVIA CZAICKI, BOZENA
136 BAYSIDE DR 332 HAM DEN DR 141 DEVON DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439
GIOVANNI, ROBERT GREENBERG, AARON HARBORSIDE TOWNHOMES LLC
KOZIK, CHRISTIAN
852 NARCISSUS AVE 142 BAYSIDE DR 163 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -1131 CLEARW A TER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502
Housh Ghovaee J M B & A DEVELOPERS LLC KALLAS, DORA
Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 1947 PETERS PL KALLAS, GEORGE
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 CLEARWATER FL 33764- 3405 GULF BLVD
Clearwater, FL 33755 BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644
KOEGLER, JEAN A KULACH,STANLEY LENEART, RENEE TRE
135 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 KULACH,ANNA 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 150 BRIGHTWATER DR CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC MARKS, IRWIN J MARSZALEK, ROMAN
521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 MARKS, DAWN D CIUS, MIECZYSLAW
CLEARWATER FL 33767- 115 BRIGHTWATER DR 166 BRIGHTWATER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
MARTINOS, GEORGIOS D
MARTINOS, DOROTHY
PO BOX 5940
MI LLER PLACE NY 11764 - 1225
MORGAN, GEORGE W
122 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
PARADISE COVE TOWN HOMES
HOMEOW
9100 BAY HILL BLVD
ORLANDO FL 32819 - 4883
SAUNDERS, WILLIAM
SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY
333 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2449
SIMON, RICHARD A
1474 S PAIRIE AVE #D
CHICAGO IL 60608 - 2208
TAS, JERRY
TAS,TERESA
342 HAM DEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451
TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST
163 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767-
WAZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
WAZIO, IRENA
110 BRIGHTWATER DR#4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
e
MAZZON, MAURIZIO
110 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767-
PALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN INC
110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
R T V PROPERTIES INC
PO BOX 3835
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835
SEACOVE PTNSHP
316 HAM DEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448
SUN WEST PALMS DEV LLC
409 HAM DEN DR S
CLEARWATER FL 33767-
THOMAS, BRIAN
THOMAS, NADINE
160 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
US-EURO-TRADE INC
346 HAM DEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451
WILK, THOMAS J
WILK, STASIA
451 HARBOR DR S
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 -
3118
e
MEARS, ROBERT E SR
MEARS, BARRY L
PO BOX 2436
CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2436
PARADISE COVE CLEARWATER INC
9100 BAY HILL BLVD
ORLANDO FL 32819 - 4883
ROGERS, ROLAND
321 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767-
SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B
SHAH, MANNAJ
326 HAM DEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448
SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ
KUNOWSKA, EWA
333 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433
TRACEY, ISABELLA S
135 DEVON DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439
VASILAROS, SOPHIA
111 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767-
ZURAWSKI, BOGDAN
ZURAWSKI, ANNA
139 BRIGHTWATER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402
CLEARWATER
CI'fY OF
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
June 24, 2005
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case Nos. FLD2003-02007A/PLT2003-0000l
130 Brightwater Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On June 21, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for
(1) Flexible Development approval to permit nine attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to
the side (east) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, as an amendment to a previously approved
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted attached
dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to
seven feet and six feet, respectively, (to building), reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to
zero feet (to pavement) and 13 feet (to pool) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public
right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C]); and (2) Preliminary Plat for the replatting of nine townhome lots. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the applications with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Division 7, for SubdivisionslPlats;
4. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval: (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD2003-02007)
1. * That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. * That all Solid Waste Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. * That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of
the building with regards to color, materials and finish
4. * That all Fire Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
5. * That a tree survey be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BILL]OKSOK, VICE-MAYOR
HoYT H!\:'.1ll.TON, COllNClLMEMBER
]OHI'\ DORAK, COllI'\CIL\lDlllER
CARLEN A. PETERSEt-i, COI'KCIDIglBER
*
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLmTR"
..
June 24, 2005
Ghovaee - Page Two
6. * That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
7. * That a site plan indicating a sidewalk four feet in width within the right-of-way be submitted to and
approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
8. * That all required Transportation Impact Fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and
9. * That evidence of a SWFWMD permit be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of
any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (June 21, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
~(!,
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on July 8, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.mvclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sin:~~Jl' . ./? )..
~~
Michael D~p\kp
Planning Director
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX (FLD)\Inactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater 130 Brightwater Cove (7) - ApprovedlBrightwater
130 Development Order 6.24. 05. doc
"........,
LI'TY OF
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
June 24, 2005
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case Nos. FLD2003-02007A1PLT2003-00001
130 Brightwater Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On June 21, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for
(1) Flexible Development approval to permit nine attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction to
the side (east) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, as an amendment to a previously approved
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Case No. FLD2003-02007 [which permitted attached
dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to
seven feet and six feet, respectively, (to building), reduction in the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to
zero feet (to pavement) and 13 feet (to pool) and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public
right-of-way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C]); and (2) Preliminary Plat for the replatting of nine townhome lots. The Community Development
Board (CDB) APPROVED the applications with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Division 7, for SubdivisionslPlats;
4. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval: (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD2003-02007)
1. * That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. * That all Solid Waste Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
3. * That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of
the building with regards to color, materials and finish
4. * That all Fire Code requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
5. * That a tree survey be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
FRANK HIIJBARD, MAYOR
BILL jot-;SOi\, VICE-MAYOR
HoYT HA~jILTON, COllNClLMEMBER
jOHI" DORAI", COUI"CIL\lD1BER
CARLEN A. PETERSEt-;, COl'I"CIL~IE\1BER
~..'"
~~1:JI
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLml:R"
June 24, 2005
Ghovaee - Page Two
6. * That all Stormwater requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
7.* That a site plan indicating a sidewalk four feet in width within the right-of-way be submitted to and
approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits;
8. * That all required Transportation Impact Fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and
9. * That evidence of a SWFWMD permit be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of
any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (June 21, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
'<\ .
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on July 8, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myclearwater.com/~ov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sinc~J:Y,7'.' ") i_
//Y~
Michael D~~kp
Planning Director
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)I/nactive or Finished ApplicationslBrightwater /30 Brightwater Cove (1) - ApprovedlBrightwater
J 30 Development Order 6.24.05.doc