FLD2003-06030 - PLT2003-00004
>
It
CASE.
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #: 2...~
ZONING DISTRICT: J
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ~f' 1-\
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
"
i:r
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
~
J
J
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and,3) folded sets of site plans
SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE$ / ~ , 'D"D
. '
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) ffn!L=.f:>" [~:~...JIl [fL,r--~'Y
Ii' , I !.!
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT ~PPLICATIQ\N1 \! AUG 1 8 2003 11 i}:
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 11/05/0 1 U _ ____.__.1
f'~~':'J;',:lr..1G & U~~\/ELCJF":v~t~,;\.'~l ~~\t' "~
- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additional sheets as necessary elf{ OF Ct.EJ~P.'/\'~\1 Ul
:~p:~I:T. PROQ:=::D;::T10N: (Section 4-202.A)
MAILING ADDRESS: ,Q\c) -30 L\.-:.-) \ q l), . QJ -E..o... "\\ ~ '1 He- ';5'a 7 to ,S
I
E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: '"lC1'l.1J -00 d-- I
CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER:
p~TY OWNER(S) 9:t::~.:+ u. 1. l)e.. Sk PC"'(\f) G. 'I"lA ~I\'\'O-. L.
~><- ~\:~~deALLowners)
:E~~::::::SS:~~~~;X'_~~~~I~~i~~~Y;~~~
E-MAIL ADDRESS: ~C'neji~\~esQ~HONE NUMBER: L\,-\ 2> ____;)'60 '1
CELL NUMBER: ~09 -oq \..\ ~ FAX NUMBER: . ~ l1: Co - %03 Cp
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:
~~ ).
.I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresl ential use)
~\ '\:' l\81
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): j e ~ " ~ '~ '.'\-. .
Qnctude all requested code deVIations; e.g. reduction In required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.}
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
1,- D~ES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRAr...R OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PR
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO
d~cuments,>
Y APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
{if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o
. '
Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located. Se,e.- 4 ~~ bt-t- It B I I , .
2.
The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. ~ ef' _ 7~1'~'v ('~ II 'f\(
3.
The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.' ~'e- &\~b\\- il &/1 .
4.
The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
~-- ~' .~' fJ!'
.~ . -j-,\ f)\t' 1\
5.
The proposed development is consistent with the community chara ter of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
. . '. ~~ ; It I{
6.
The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, includin visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.' It tI
o
Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how ea~h criteria is achieved in detail:
1.
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proPQsed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
~~ ~~~'bUII
Page 2 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
r 2
I
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
Imp_menlsl 5,..-p ~ Z)(~,;b[+- II fl
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill rede~lopment project ~re otherwise ennitted in the City of Clearwater.
It' I(
. .
4.
The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are comp tible with adjacent land uses.
r 1/ I
5.
Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the com rehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. . ; "I', 1\./1
6.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a co~prehen ive i fill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development. C"." . ". \ 11 I
~~ C:. ' ,
7.
The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
~~ -e __ L~~'~ k\(t- II fIl(
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
~<::\- 4~\f)l\ II ryl
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
~-~
4~0~1\P11/
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
:jcc 7~ \-1,r+-- " tY
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
j
r
C. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL RE.EMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
.
o SIGNEO AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
o LOCATION MAP OFTHE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the ;iubmittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
. .
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles; .
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and waterlines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per
Section 3-201(0)(i) and Index#701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water manCigement facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all eXisting and proposed sidewalks
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if pOSSible
D FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater
. G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITT~_ EQUIREMENTS: (Section'4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dr/pline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Location, size, description, speCifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for tree~, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants incluping instructions, SQil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) (color rendering if possible)
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yz X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
'~.
I
.
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o
Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
\to C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described n this application.
Sig ature of property owner or representative
~ ::I1YQ
i- V'-9
t:>NtH33Nt'DN3 ot:l::!'fl:ll
H31'VM\:l'V31~ :10 A.UO
03^O\:iddV
-
-
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
produced
identification.
\:)0 ~Q~'-'~ChM n
Notary public, \
My commission expires:
~",\I \""" '"11/
~"" a ~nn H. ~II",
~~ <"\'<,~t ....... ClI'Il.;" ~
~, v.' "SIO '. U ,~
~ ...~~\" N~;'" ~
~ .. ,I:i ~",\ 15,.?, ~'. ~
- ..>...~~ "'o~,-
: :~~ V"cp~;:
=*: ..... :*:
%-5 ~. #CC863281 f ?J i
~~'" ~80nded\\\'" ~ ...~
~~f- A':~ rajn.lnSIl\~:"~ ~v ~
~IIIP8Lic:ST~;'(:. ~"~~
1111"",,,\1\\"'"
RECEIVED
JUN 1 8 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CL.EARVVle\TER
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with Northside
Robert W. De Stefano and
Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for Donna L. De Stefano
(Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
(Lots 7 and 8, Bayside Subdivision No.2)
125 Brightwater Drive, Clearwater Florida
(Property Location)
Pinellas
, lying within
County, State of Florida
f{ 0 6 €J'?.T W J) Il STfi ~fl/VCJ
VCJ/7//?L J-, 7)e ~/~rr;nCJ
Print Name of Property Owner
C-O
ignature of Property Ow
/<16 A'r~~-'.Mfe.e 2)g
Add'ress of Pro y Owner
(!!eCL/'uJa ~r lid" FL, .337~ 7
City/State/Zip Code /
\\\\\\1111111111/1
.....'"... ~a "nn H<; 'II,,,
*' <'.~'<;;> ....... :r~n ~
s v . SID.. u ~
~ ...~~\S N~.. ~
~ .. (jO ~~'o\ 15, <a ~... ~
: .~~~ ~~~ ~
~*: ..... :*~
~ -z ~ i1CC863281 :?$ ~
~-~ -. .. 92~
~~/~..J;.o':~ded\~~~..,,$5~ Commission #
~ rA":. am.lns\>.. <-' '*
~~'IV6'iic.ST~~ ~~~ ~
"'111111m,,"""'" '
(SEAL ABOVE) .e
State of \=\r_Yr~Cl...
County o(Y ~ " e \ ~S
7;;17 tltlc:l 37:J5
Telephone Number
The foregoing instrumentxva~ acknowled efore J11~ t~ _ d- d day
't\OtJC? '1'-1- .~~
of J l\ \ \A , 20.Q3, by '\ 1.--... ',f.'@s
who is pen'!~naIlY known to m~has-prOd(J~ ~Y-\~~
BT\VC\ ~~
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
QD ~~-~~
(Signa re) . ~
Notary Public
arne of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped)
,.
.
.
Revised
Exhibit A to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application
125 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas I
NES Project #0327
. '
Description of Request: To construct a six (6) unit, 4 story townhome use (three levels of
living area above individual garages) with an increase in allowable height from 35' to
40.33' and with reductions to the required front yard setback from 15.0' to 10.6' to the
walkway, reductions to the required east and west side yard setbacks from 10' to 3.8' for
the building itself, from 10' to 6'on both the east and west sides to the building in the
pool/deck area, a reduction to the required side yard setbacks from 10' ranging from 4.8'
to 5.3' on the west to pavement (driveways), a reduction to the required side yard setback
on the east from 10' ranging from 4.5' to 5' to pavement (driveways) with a reduction to
the required rear setback from 20' to 0' for the boardwalk area and from 20' to 15.7' for
the individual pools, and from 20' to 17' to pool decks. Additionally the applicant is
requesting permission for vehicles to back out into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way
from the proposed individual garages. The existing boat dock with three boat slips will
remain on site for the sole use of the property owners.
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A)
1. This site is located within the Small Motel district and is currently occupied by a
small 10-unit overnight accommodation use. The land coverage being requested is
consistent with surrounding properties and less than that of the existing structure
as this area consists of more intense uses such as older, small, motels with little to
no on-site parking. Additionally, the majority of existing motel uses in the
vicinity maintain paved parking areas that spill out into the right-of-way. The
proposed four (4) story, six-unit residential townhome structure is consistent with
the scale and bulk of adjacent and surrounding residential properties and will be
less intense than that ofthe current overnight accommodation use on site. The
proposed side setback reductions are less intrusive than that of the existing one
story motel use. With the way that Brightwater Drive is developing into a street
of condominiums and town homes as opposed to the smaller existing motels, the
proposed building will not appear to be "overwhelming" to the adjacent
properties. The flavor of this area is changing and the proposed "Italian villa"
style architecture will be a grand addition to Brightwater Drive. In order for this
project to be a viable one, the units themselves must remain at the square footage
proposed. By reducing the width of the units to less than the proposed 17' or by
reducing the total number of units on site to less than six, the town homes become
unattractive to potential purchasers due to either size or price and therefore the
project becomes un-marketable. Today's market virtually mandates the proposed
unit size and setbacks for these projects to be viable. Significant landscaping is
being proposed in order to buffer adjacent sites from the town home building
1
,
.
.
proposed. Even with the proposed zero foot rear setback to the boardwalk and
13.3 foot rear setback to the pools, these proposed rear setbacks are less intense
than other developments in the immediate area that have zero rear setbacks to
accommodate pool decking. The proposal includes totally enclosed individual
garage parking, accessed by typical individual single-family driveways. The
request to reduce the required side yard setbacks to the driveways will not
adversely impact the adjacent sites as these aref individual driveways as opposed
to a mass open parking lot situation. The request to increase the allowable height
from 35' to 40.33' is justifiable in that the Beach By Design program allows for
two to four levels of living area above parking. Section 2-803 of the City of
Clearwater Community Development Code allows for heights between 35'-100'
through the Flexible Development process. The proposed height will allow for
adequate ceiling heights based on today's standards as well as appropriate scale
for the proposed architectural style. The existing boat dock is to remain as is with
three boat slips and will be for the sole use of the property owners. The existing
boats docked on site will not remain and will be removed prior to the issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed building.
2. The proposed single-family "villa style" town home development will not hinder
or discourage redevelopment of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the
intent of the Beach by Design program forthe Small Motel district. With the
construction of this upscale "villa style" waterfront residential town home use and
tropical landscaping, other surrounding property owners will be encouraged to
come closer into compliance with the intent of the Beach by Design program. The
design of the proposed project will be aesthetically pleasing to passers-by and
adjacent sites and will be a significant improvement to the surrounding
community. Additionally, Strategies for Revitalization calls for the conversion of
this area to two to four level townhouses and time-shares above parking as
proposed.
3. The proposed six-unit, single-family townhome use will create less of an adverse
impact to users of the area than the more intense surrounding and on-site motel
uses as the site will be occupied by long-term residents (homeowners) as opposed
to transient tenants. Visibility triangles will be maintained to ensure pedestrian
and vehicular safety. The request to back out into the right-of-way is due to the
single-family homeowners having individual driveways as opposed to a "mass
parking area". A retention area will be constructed at the rear of the site
eliminating runoff onto adjacent properties.
4. The minimization of traffic impact being generated from the site is realized by the
proposed single-family townhome use. Other permitted uses within the Tourist
zoning district such as restaurants, retail sales, marina facilities, etc, could
generate much heavier traffic for the immediate area and prove to be an adverse
impact in intensity for the BrightwaterDrive right-of-way as opposed to the
proposed single-family development.
5. The majority of the immediate vicinity consists oflow scale motel buildings built
in the 60's and 70's with non-uniform signage. The future vision of the Small
Motel district is for two to four story townhomes and timeshares over parking.
This proposal is a step in the right direction in order to achieve that vision for the
2
.
.
immediate vicinity. No freestanding signage is proposed for this site which along
with the proposed enclosed parking will reduce visual blight along the
Brightwater Drive right-of-way.
6. The proposed development will enhance the visual character of the neighborhood,
increase surrounding property values and shall not be a negative impact in regards
to acoustics and olfactory issues as a more intense commercial use may be. On-
site lighting will not adversely impact surrounoing properties, as all exterior
lighting will be limited to individual attached fixtures for each unit. No spillage
onto adjacent properties will occur. Noise intrusion onto adjacent properties is not
anticipated over and above what the typical single-family use would produce.
Individual roll-out trash cans will be utilized by each homeowner and will be kept
within the garage areas except on sanitation pick-up days.
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. This site is located within the Small Motel district. Currently the site is occupied
with an overnight accommodation use. The proposal includes razing the existing
10-unit motel use on site and developing the site with a six-unit, four-story
townhome structure. Similar and more intense side setback reductions exist on
site now with the motel use and the existing front setbacks are more intrusive than
the proposed 20' setback for the proposed project. The applicant is proposing to
construct mid-level, luxury, "villa style" town homes compatible with the Beach
by Design program. The proposed floor plans consist of individual enclosed
garage parking on the first level with three floors of living area above. Each
garage space will accommodate two vehicles for a total of 12 parking spaces.
Driveways will be separated from the adjacent drive by a landscape island with
the exception of the four center driveways. These central drives will be joined
within the right-of-way but once on the site will be separated with a landscape
island. These driveways will be typical of a single-family use and should not
adversely impact the adjacent sites with their proximity to the side property lines,
as would an open parking lot for a condominium or commercial use. The typical
single-family driveway area proposed is the reason for the need to back out into
the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Due to the proposal being a single-family
residential townhome use, the number of vehicles backing into the right-of-way
will be minimal. Additionally, the maintenance of visibility triangles on site will
ensure safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The side setback reductions
being requested for the building itself are a result of an irregularly shaped site.
The requested side setback reductions of3.8 ' to the building will allow the site to
be developed with residential units of adequate width for the upscale style
waterfront type living being offered. If the units were to be reduced in size in
order to provide greater setbacks, thes~ town homes would be less desirable for
purchase and would then become a non-viable project. Similar and more
intrusive side setbacks exist within the area so that the proposed side setback will
not be inconsistent with the surrounding area. The zero foot rear setback being
requested is for the accommodation of a boardwalk running parallel to the
seawall. This boardwalk will allow for access to the existing docks from the
3
"
.
.
individual units, The rear setback of 13,3 feet for the proposed individual pools
will allow for a minimal size pool for use only by the residents on site, The
applicant is proposing to retain the existing dock as an amenity for the
homeowners on site, Although the applicant is requesting to increase the
allowable height from 35' to 40,33', the Beach By Design program allows for two
to four levels of living area above parking, The existing boat dock provides three
existing bO<,lt slips, The existing boats on site will be removed prior to issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy. A minimum of six townhomes of the size and caliber
proposed is needed to make this project financially viable.
2. The proposed residential use will likely enhance property values in the area by
providing new, quality, residential construction and significant landscaping on
site. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing value is $600,000.00. This
proposed townhome development would significantly improve the value of the
site to approximately $3,000,000.00. This increase in value and the draw oflong-
term residential homeowners into the immediate area will generate additional tax
dollars for the City of Clearwater.
3. The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings as proposed. Additionally, the
proposed four-story townhome project is consistent with the vision of the Beach
by Design program for the Small Motel district.
4. The proposed six-unit single-family residential townhomes are compatible with
the surrounding land uses as many of the neighboring motels maintain long lease
tenants. Many of these existing overnight accommodation uses are being replaced
with single-family town home and condominium uses. Additionally, the infill of
the proposed single-family use will allow for less traffic congestion within the
area, which will be a positive impact for surrounding uses. Also, Strategies for
Revitalization call for the conversion of this Small Motel district area to two to
four level townhomes and time shares above parking.
5. At this time, properties are not readily available for this type of upscale, single-
family, waterfront, townhome development within this immediate desirable area.
The location of Brightwater Drive being on the Intracoastal Waterway and in
between two residential fingers makes this proposal a compatible development for
the area in addition to being consistent with the intent of the Clearwater Beach by
Design program.
6. The immediate vicinity ofthe subject parcel will be upgraded aesthetically not
only by the architectural design of the new townhomes but also by the proposed
landscaping and single-family residential use.
7. The proposed development will playa role in the continuous positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a newly revitalized site and
new buildings with long term residents. The proposal will provide on site parking,
thereby eliminating any need for related parking within the right-of-way. The
proposed site plan, inclusive of landsc'!.ping, will be a significant improvement to
the surrounding area. In addition, the bringing in of affluent single-family
property owners will trigger the increase of tax dollars for the City and will
trigger an increase in revenue for businesses within the surrounding beach and
downtown communities.
4
:
.
.
8. The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
construction of an attractive, villa style, residential project on a site currently
occupied by an outdated and small overnight accommodation use. The proposed
project reflects the City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is
consistent with Beach by Design. The site is generally unmarketable and
unusable without the approval of the setbacks being requested and to back out
from resideptial driveways into the Brightwate;.Drive right-of-way. The setback
reductions being proposed are similar and less intrusive than the existing setbacks
of the motel on site. Allowing the backing out of vehicles into the right-of-way
from this site will only add to the realization of the typical passersby that this is a
single-family use as opposed to overnight accommodations.
9. Adequate, enclosed parking will be provided on site. The proposal, as part of a
Flexible Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 parking spaces
per dwelling unit or 9 spaces. The proposal includes two spaces per dwelling unit
for a total of 12 parking spaces thereby eliminating the need for parking within
the right-of-way. This feature alone will help to reduce on street parking which
only increases traffic congestion.
10. The design of the proposed townhome building complies with the Tourist
District/Beach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking is being
provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The proposal is for a
four-story townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of
this area to two to four level townhouses and time-shares above parking. The
proposed architectural design and tropical landscaping will be aesthetically
pleasing. The proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach
from other beach areas as it will be helping to bring the immediate area closer into
compliance with Code. The residential design of the proposed project will help to
create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" and the street level of this
project will be pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all
required visibility triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-
street parking will also lend to an aesthetically pleasing project in lieu of massive
open parking areas and parking within the right-of-way.
5
.
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
APPLICANTS NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
AGENT NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
.
.
rrD j€ 0~I(U,W ~""" rn-Y
III . <! (i i! I
jt 1J tl i: '
I I U/ AUG 1 8 2003 !UD
-,~-"~,:::--,-",,."",__.J
"'~ ING 8. or.::\i~LOHv:h\jl :::'vC~
TV F CLEAR!"VA1[f{
CITY OF CLEARWATE
APPLICATION FOR PLAT APP
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADM!
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. 2nd FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
i2p~t G-)~~ePr1M:"~~*e~,"
:~O lY~') \~W. )('\PO:-Il~" f"-\ '\..ja~~'5
: _ 'l q LQ -00 d- \ __ FAX NUMBER: ~ l') -"5'SO <-}
: -frf\~M~lf\e\\'\'O-..
: ~\O~O ~~l.:LU)O \eD,.H.)o.l~~_a..3n
(P~)~~J-.\ _ FAX NUMBER :~~=L_
. :Cl:e'f ). "b\~~(~\}; ~"I
_.~ " ~._.' . J-:jl(.
. ~ ~ / '\ 'C..... u__:~
: :=i:~~_d%lo9 FAXNUMBER :~lc:; ~(J o~ '3"3/55
I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PtNE~
representations made in this application sw~rn.to and.. subscribed before me this }Jl.~.
are true and ~curat~ to the best of my ..... __'_ ""'l 0\"{\.Q... , A.D~O me and/or
knowledg f~~ ~...-. - '--.
by; '::.. 0C~. Wh~"Y kf'lO~n_ to ______~
me or has produced ft.----
~if~On ~~
-~,,-~
t . ""
my commisSi~eXPires: '. ~ ~" s ~~\'O n Hal'1!I';"
..~.. . L , ~ ~ .......~~S.I~.~..~'I)' ~
i\ ;::: ..~",\V ""~~'. ~
~ lc.a >>~\ 15, .?7~<<>'. ~
.::: 1I~ .~~ 'T(;a~..-:::'
E. ::. ~ (p~*~
=*. .... . =
The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engin~~W~~:!Q,le J ~~
not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following informatlon:~ l? ". J: <% de<!~ ~ .. ~~
,\~)-". ./'oy ";in-lnSll~"". ..,~ ~
~ A" .' d< *'
NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; ""1. V8lic'S1~~ ~"~
'I1"",,,it 111\\\\\\\
Ten (10) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted.
TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED;
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT;
IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES;
PROPOSED STREET NAMES;
EXISTiNG AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS;
Page I
.
.
DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT
STREETS
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS;
COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY.
. '
Page 2
.
.
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with Nortbside.
· 'Robert W. De Stefano and
Engineering Services,lnc. to act as an agent for Donna 1. De Stefano
(Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing penn its
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
(Lots 7 and 8, Bayside Subdivision No.2)
125 Brightwater Drive, Clearwater Florida , lying within
(Property Location) .
Pinellas County, State of Florida
fkW I/)J ,&- ~ R 0 6 Kfi., CA.) .D € STitt:A-/f/~
~bt." ~ VCJ/1/1rL J.-, 7Je r'te-kn<)
Ignature of Property Ow Pnnt Name of Property Owner
A~~Of~~~~t~ 7Jk' Tel~~':N~~: ~7.{J6
(!!ecvuJt:L ler Jfd 1 FL. .337t, 7
City/State/Zip Code / .
~\\\'\lIltIll*'lll
).\,\'\ ~a Ann Ha ~;'.Il
~<">.0'f;j.........I"-?'n ~...
:s 'V . Sl -. u- ,..
. *' .':~\\S ON ~.~. ~
~ ..Q~ ~ . ~
~ .. Cj ~\15'<a ~'" ~
: :~~ ~~':. S
~*: ..... :* ~
~ ~ ~ ilCC863281 i?S ~
~~.. .~~
~~,~..~~~~.,~~~ Commission #
~r '7~~~~~~ .
,..~ ~......~()'\ ~
'111"I"I~~\\\\\'~ ~ ;
(SEAL ABOVt:) ~
state of \==\)r~~_
County a;Y~ \"\ e \\~S
The foregoing instrum. ent)fas aCl<noW~ed~122efOre J!.1~ th~ _ !)..cd.. day
~Q)-r~ ~~.\'CJ
of J I.~ \ \...\ , 20.Q3, by . ,''C--. l-.. . W \,~S
\
who is pe~onally known to m~Q has producecr---.. ~oY<n.D--
--- ~. i\\ \Je, 'wC..~
as identification and who did (did not) take an oath.
~Q ~^'-~~~
(Signa re) .
Notary Public
ame of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped}
. . ~:Y.) ,
C' '::7' _} '--)
'., " '1
C' ,:,) ,,;r 7
ROGERS BEACH DEVELOPMENT
P.O. Box 676. Crystal Beach, Florida 34681 . 727-512-0468 . 727-789-2982 Fax. rjrogers16@aol.com
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Ave'.
Clearwater Fl. 33767
Attn. Wayne Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
RE: Upcoming Development on Brightwater Drive
. '
!I rJ I, r~ (~ r~,Q.n~Jrl!1
II' < i :i i I I'
I). \1 iil' i
!llll III AUG 18 2003 'I U j
r- ~, J-J
I f-.J.~..Ni"!G :."IX\iE!(JP\/:<"l s\c~
L_ C'i fy OF CU:J;f1V,'.,\IC;:j
8/14/03
.'
Mr. Wells,
I would like to thank you for your help and support as we move forward with our
redevelopment projects on Clearwater Beach. I presently have over 12 projects in various
stages of construction or planning, with our anticipated sales to be well over
$200,000,000.00. In short the economic foresight Beach by Design dreamed of is
beginning to be realized. Properties like the ones we replaced at 200 Brightwater Drive,
which had a tax value between $ 500,000.00 and $600,000.00, now have a basis of
$5,000,000.00 to $6,000,000.00; this truly is a winning situation for the city and its aging
infrastructure, as well as myself, my investors' and our home buyers.
As you are aware a competing developer, Anthony Menna has submitted 2 projects to
the City for consideration. I would like to welcome him to the beach and ask that you
support him in any way you or the staff can.
Specifically on the project located at 118 and 120 Brightwater Drive, to the immediate
west of our Brightwater Cove development. Although staffhas expressed concerns over
this design, I think it helps add to the " Village" look we have tried to create. Also as the
owner of the adjoining property I am not opposed to the requested relief as to the set back
requirements.
In closing, I again ask for your support of these projects and even though I have not
spoken to Mr. Menna}I am sure he would agree that by working together we can make the
revitalization of Clearwater Beach something we all can be proud of.
i
i.h.M_
~
.I...
Thank. you for your assistance with this matter.
2&
ti~I:Y~
.,
SURVEY ABBREVIA llONS
A = ARC LENGTIi
A/C = AIR CONDITIONER
ftf = ALUUINUM FENCE
ALUU = ALUMlNUU
ASPH :: ASPHALT
BFE = BASE FLOOO ELEVATION
BlOG = BUILDING
BlK = BLOCK
BM = BENCH MARK
BNDY = BOUNDARY
BRG = BEARING
B\f' = BARBEO WIRE FENCE
C = CALCULA lED
CB :: CHORD BEARING
CBS = CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURE
CHD = CHORD
CL = CENTERUNE
CLF = CHAIN UNK FENCE
CLOS = ClOSURE
Cot. = COLUMN
CONC = CONCRElE
CR = COUNTY ROAD
C/S = CONCRETE SLAB
COR = CORNER
COV = COVERED AREA
o = DEED
DOT = DEPARTt.fENT OF TRANSPORTAllON
DRNG = DRAINAGE
o /W = DRIVEWAY
EL OR illV = ElEVA liON
EOP= EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EOW :: EDGE OF WATER
ESt.f'T = EASEMENT
FCt.f = FOUND CONCREJE MONUMENT
FES .. FLARED END SECllON
AP :: FOUND IRON PIPE
FIR =. FOUND IRON ROD
FL = FLOW UNE
FLD = FIElD
FHD = FOUND
fOP = FOUND OPEN PIPE
fPC = FLORIDA POWER CORP.
.
FPP :: FOUND PINCHED PIPE
FRM :: FRAME
FZL II: FLOOD ZONE UNE
GAR = GARAGE
G/E = GLASS ENCLOSURE
H\\f = HOG WIRE FENCE
H'M. = HIGH WATER UNE
INV = IN\{RT
La :: LAND SUR\{)1NG BUSINESS
LFE :: LO\\6T FLOOR ElEV
Ulst.l .. LOWEST HORIZONTAL SUPPORllNG UEUBER
LS = LAND SURVEYOR
M = MEASURED
MAS a MASONRY
UES a MITERED END SECllON
UH = UANHOLE
UHYtt .. MEAN HIGH WATER UNE
MSl :: MEAN SEA LEVEL
N&B :: NAIL AND BOTTLE CAP
NIlD = NAIL AND DISK
NleT = NAIL AND TAB
NGW = NAllONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM
NO = NUMBER
O/A = OVERALL
OHW = OVERHEAD WlRE(S)
OR = omClAL RECORDS
O/S = OFFSET
P :: PLAT
PB = PLAT BOOK
PC = POINT OF CURVE
PCC = POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE
PCP .. PERUANENT CONTROl POINT
PG = PAGE
PK = PARKER KALON
PL = PROPERTY UNE
POB :: POINT OF BEGINNING
POC = POINT Of COMMENCEMENT
POI.. :: POINT ON UNE
PP = POWER POLE
PRC = POINT Of REVERSE CURVATURE
PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT
.
PROP = PROPERTY
PSt.f :: PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR Ie UAPPER
PT = POINT OF TANGENCY
PW'T = P A VEUENT
RAD = RADIUS
R = RECORD
REF = REFERENCE
RES = RESIDENCE
RL = RADIAL UNE
RLS = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
RND :: ROUND
RNG = RANGE
RRS = RAIL ROAD SPIKE
R/W .. RIGHT-OF-WAY
scu .. SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
S/E :: SCREENED ENCLOSURE
SEC = SECll0N
SET N&D :: SET NAIL AND DISK RLS# 2512
SIR = SET 1/2" IRON ROD RlS# 2512
50 .. SQUARE
SRF = SPUT RAIL FENCE
SR = STATE ROAD
STY = STORY
SUB = SUBDIVISION
S/W = SIDEWALK
TB = "r BAR
TBM :: TEMPORARY BENCH MARK
TC = TOP OF CURB
TOB = TOP OF BANK
TOS = TOE Of SlOPE
TRANS :: TRANSFORMER
l'M' .. TO\\t4SHIP
TYP :: TYPICAL
UG = UNDERGROUND
UllL :: UllUTY
Ml :: WOOD
'Iff = WOOD FENCE
WlF :: WROUGHT IRON FENCE
\'I1T = WllNESS
YtRF = WIRE FENCE
WV = WATER VALVE
... ABBREVlA l10NS MAY ALSO BE CONCATENATED AS REQUIRED.
... OlHER COMMONLY RECOGNIZED AND lOR ACCEPTED ABBREVlA l10NS ARE ALSO UTlUZEO BUT NOT SPEClRED HEREON.
GENERAL NOTES
1. UNLESS OlHERWSE STATED, n1E PROPERlY DESCRIP110N SHO~ HEREON WAS PRO\1OED BY lHE CUENT, OR CUENfs
DESIGNATED AGENT.
2. UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT UMllED TO BUILDING FOUNDA11ONS, HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED
EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON.
3. INACCESSIBLE ABOVE GROUND IMPROVEMENTS (E.G. BUILDING OVERHANGS. lHOSE Yt1lHIN SECURED AREAS, ETC.), HAVE
NOT BEEN lOCATED EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON.
4. UNLESS OlHERYt1SE STATED, lHlS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WlntOUT lHE BENERT OF A 11ltE SEARCH AND MAY BE
SUBJECT TO AODIllONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHT-Of-WAYS, AND OlHER MATTERS OF RECORD.
5. lHERE ARE NO \1SIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. EXCEPT AS SH~ HEREON.
6. BECAUSE OF lHE POSSlBlUlY OF MOVEMENT OF lHE MONUMENTATlON FROM ITS ORIGINAL PLACEMENT BY PERSONS
OlHER lHAN lHE SURVEYOR, IT IS RECOMMENDED lHA T PRIOR TO ANY NEW IMPROVEMENTS ON lHE PROPERTY
lHE POSI11ON OF lHE MONUMENTATlON BE VERlRED.
7. UNAUnlORIZED COPIES AND/OR REPRODUC11ONS \1A ANY MEDIUM OF THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY POft11ONS THEREOF
ARE EXPRESSI. Y PROHIBITED WllHOUT lHE SIGNING SUR\fiOR'S WRITTEN CONSENT.
8. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS PLAT, UNLESS OlHERWlSE SHOWN OR STAlED.
9. ALL BUILDING 11ES. PROPERTY MARKER LOCA11ONS AND OlHER SITE IMPROVEMENT LOCA11ONS SHOWN HEREON ARE
MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO ADJACENT BOUNDARY UNES, UNLESS OlHERYt1SE STATEO.
10. FLOOD ZONE DESlGNA110N AND/OR FLOOD ZONE UNES (IF ANY) SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN SCALED FROM lHE
REFERENCED MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. lHE 'TRUE FLOOD ZONE UNES MUST BE DETERMINED BY AN ENGINEER.
11. lHlS SURVEY DOES NOT DETERMINE OR IMPLY OWNERSHIP.
12. lHERE MAY BE AODl11ONAL RES'TRIC11ONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER MA TIERS OF RECORD lHA T ARE NOT SHOWN
HEREON lHA T MAYBE FOUND IN lHE PUBUC RECORDS OF lHlS COUNlY.
NOTE: lHlS SURVEYOR'S REPORT IS NOT COMPlETE OR VAUD UNLESS ATTACHED TO THE SURVEY.
SURVEYOR'S REPORT
GEORGE A. SHIMP II AND
ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
PHONS (7.17) 781-5196 I'D (7/7) 786-1.156
GEORGE A. IMP II, FLORIDA REGlSTE ND SURVEYOR No. 2512
DWAYNE A. RUTH, PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR Ie MAPPER No. 5635
C:;3044"2- 7~-/O-Q3.
JOB NUMBER DATE
./
f 11, -. ..
.
88....481 ~UN-18-1888 ~,26
PI~AS CO 8K 10558 PG '236~
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ",
Ifnli. I ' n; f:,r l~: 11 lI.n rc:. .~ r'.~.'~~'l:
:' "__',' .' \. '4.1 tf:; I! L
\. I! . -""-'--"--" ..' _._~! .. .
; l '; I; i; H
\ I ; t \ ~ j I
il'.l AlJr.' ~ 8 2003 ;' I; ·
iJ LJi'" I ;!_~
_ _ . .._..._._.1
F-~I,.;-";Ii':C ~ D":-\'t:i(jF"v\,i.'-1 :.,~ c;;
Cll'f OF Cl.Ej':J1Wt\1 U{
Prepared by & return to' /'
DAWN CZUBAN, BANKERS TITLE
509 S. Greenwood Ave., Ste. A
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Parcel No.: Oa-29-15-04932-000-0070(Lot 7)
Oa-29-15-04932-000-00aO(Lot B)
WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE made this ~6~ day of May, 1999, BETWEEN
INTERNATIONAL 2000, INC., a Florida Corporation and JOSEPH ZYKUS
and LINDA ZYKUS, husband and wife, of the County of Pinellas, State
of Florida, Grantor, and ROBERT W. DE STEFANO and DONNA. L. DE
STEFANO, of the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Grantee,
whose address is: PO BOX 3483, Clearwater Beach, Florida 33767
WITNESSETH, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the
sum of Ten and No/lOa Dollars and other good and valuable
considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the
receipt whereof is herepy acknowledged, has granted, bargained and
sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever,
the following described land, situate, lying and being in pinellas
County, Florida, to wit:
AGES _:P- _ Lots 7 and. 8, BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO.2, according to
~~6 It., .~cJ the IJtap or plat thereo~' as recorded in. Plat Book 27,
)R21J!8't1.d d Page~ 32 and 33, PubllC Records of Plnellas County,
OS Florlda.
INT
FEES--SUHJECT TO taxes for the year 1999 and subsequent years.
MTF--SUBJECT TO easements, restrictions and reservations of record.
PIC ____
~_~d said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land,
t9~j~4-and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons
nJTAl~R0msoever.
,K BAt.. __"__
3AMT --rN-WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantors hand and
seal the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed & delivered
in the presence of...
INTERNATIONAL 2000, INC., a
Florida orporation
ignature
Name: DAwJ (2..1.~
Aa (Please;;;:)
Wit~ ~gnature
Name: Ge.luJ,e.ta- 6t//I j
lease Print)
~,
C;(, 1~YS
bY:~~
mNDA ZY:Kll"5, V1Ce Pres)..dent} ).../1
Address: ~Sh 1i ~8t.-;(,)lcn.4/ I-r-
>I'/rer'l tlr1~8JJ~1 ;:-J... :j '1-695
STATE OF FLORIDA / COUNTY OF PINELLAS
BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized in the State and County
aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared JOSEPH
ZYKUS, as President and LINDA ZYKUS, as Vice President of
INTERNATIONAL 2000, INC., a Florida Corporation, who is personally
known to me or. who has pro.duced ident~fication attesting to his
identity, to Wlt: q-L~ ..flu. i who executed the
foregoing instrument as such officer for the uses and purposes
therein intended; that he affixed hereto the official seal of said
corporation, and that said instrument is the act and deed of said
corporation. .
WI~NEsS.my ha~ and official seal in the county and state last
aforesald thlS 8..~ ~ay of May, 1999. ~
--'flj}Jj;1-1 >C~
No ary Public .
My commission expires:
l~I~A~'riJ;;:",. Dawn E. Czuban
",:/_ r'i MY COMMISSION II CC708351 EXPIRES
. ,'c. ..'ff.. February 14, 2002
";{Rf..i~it.. BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE. INC.
ooownenllfY'r. Pd. $ 5/ i,O I d !
'$. b,__TIUIPd.
K...... F ~. C1ttttc. rtnIIIII Counlf
By . . Deputy Cld
.,;//
. ..
.
AllkLLAS COUNTY FLA.
OFF.REC.8K 10558 PG 2305
~J~
Name: bA1U (!.:'Z.~
(Please Print)
~~
itn s #2 - Signature
Name: Gt!l>1e/:Ce G, {115
Please Print}
~.
.,k. ~GP~
11 DA ZYKUS di vidually. / J.. J)
Address:~~ ~3~~/CU/ ~..
5 APt=.- A '"2. 3 tf6 96
STATE OF FLORIDA / COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day before me, an officer duly
qualified to take acknowledgements, appeared JOSEPH ZYKUS and LINDA
ZYKUS, personally known to me; (~hO have produced the following
identification, to wit: ~ 'JfALJ ~H .. attesting
to their identity and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged before me the execution of the same.
WITNESS my hand APAHRfficial
aforesaid this ~ day of
County and state last
(Please Print)
My commission expires:
..';.W.~'fW". Dawn E. Czuban
<1....Ji:'t.. MY COMMISSION # CC70B3S1 EXPIRES
',,>:.~.~E February 14, 2002
"]/f'Rn~<f..l BONDED THRU TROY fAIN INSURANCf., INC
"'11"
3C14110a 06-18-1999
01 0000000000
DED-LINDA ZYKUS
RECORDING OO~ PAGES
DOC STA"P - DR219
16:2&:26
YI'IW
TOTAL:
P CHECK AI'IT.TENDERED:
CHANGE:
1 $10.50
3 $5,1&0.00
--------
$5,190.50
$5,190.50
$.00
. -Nonhsile
&~ Set~ 1l<<t,
.
CIViL-
LAND PLANNING-
ENVI RONMENTA.L -
TRANSPORTATION -
July 14, 2003
Southwest Florida Water Management District
7601 U.S. Highway 301 North
Tampa, Florida 33637
Attn: Richard M. Alt, P .E.
Project Name:
Application No.:
County:
Sec/Twp/Rge:
Belle Aqua Villas
PERMIT INQUIRY
Pinellas
8/29/15
Dear Richard:
We are submitting a permit inquiry for the above referenced project. Client
resources indicate that all existing impervious areas were constructed prior to
1984, and that no SWFWMD permits have been previously issued for this site.
The proposed construction activities consist of the following:
. REMOVAL of 1957 S.F. of existing impervious vehicular use area and 6680
S.F. of building and sidewalk area.
. Construction of 1082 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 9022 S.F. of
building and sidewalk area.
. This will yield an 875 S.F. REDUCTION of impervious vehicular use area.
The project is located in an open basin. Construction of this project will not
increase the existing peak discharge rate or volume.
No wetlands are located in or adjacent to the project area. No wetland impacts
will result from construction of this project.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
RECE\VED
JUL 1 6 200j
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLE,A.RVv;::..TER
" ,
.
.
Re: Belle Aqua Villas
July 14,2003
Page Two
All appropriate sedimentation/erosion control measures will be implemented
during construction. Since no concentrated flows exist or are proposed, it is likely
that containment ofthe project area with silt fencing is all that will be necessary.
Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any further questions
or comments regarding this project.
Sincerely,
Richard C. Kelley, Enginerin Director
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, Ste 930
Clearwater, FL. 33755
Nonhsille
&~ s~ 1~,
.
STORMWATER REPORT
FOR:
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANNI NG ·
ENVIRONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
BELLE AQUA VILLAS I
PROJECT
~
,-' .
I r--r01 r[ ~ rt~Ef. 11 fV1 '[~e r~~~j
. i- "",.I '.'-:- '_~ \.1/ ~ ~
d IJ ;;~~-~_._.~~...;~:._,,-., It!;
~! :::" f i I! 1 ~
~ I f"', \. F f; It' E
illl if AUG 1 8 2003 Ji Ii !'
~-!UI i!~
c. t ,.::;j...iC ' (.'. .. -.,,-:-~.,...J .,
-. . ~.J\,j \,~'~~: '-,"":; .J \.;c...~ i.:LLr ft.nr.'r.' ~ ~ v{;~
elft Of CtEhF.Nt'.' En 1
---..-.... ~
L
aeyaert , P.E. # 52943
August 2003
Project No.: 0327
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
14,004 SF
8,637 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
5,367 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP B)
86.89
------------
.
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN =
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.63
T.O.C. =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
.
Belle Aqua Villas I
327
14,004 SF =
8,637 SF =
o SF =
5,367 SF =
0.32 ACRES
0.20 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.12 ACRES
98
100
69
14,004 SF
8,637 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
5,367 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
1 SF =
10,104 SF =
303 SF =
3,597 SF =
0.32 ACRES
0.23 ACRES
0.01 ACRES
0.08 ACRES
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 14,004 SF
IMP. AREA= 10,104 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN = 98
POND AREA= 303 SF OF POND AREA @ CN = 100
PERV. AREA= 3,597 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN = 69
(LAWN IN FAIR CONDITION, HYDROLOGIC GROUP B)
CN = 90.59
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.72
T.O.C. =
14,004 SF
10,104 SF OF IMP. AREA@ C =
303 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
3,597 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
15 MINUTES
.
.
PROJECT NAME:
Belle Aqua Villas I
PROJECT NO. :
327
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA:
BOTTOM EL.=
STAGE AREA AREA STORAGE
ft-NGVD SF AC CF
5"10 2,400 0.055 2,194
4.85 2,222 0.051 1,255
4.60 2,318 0.053 1,174
4A8 2,177 0.050 907
4.24 1,896 0.044 421
4.00 1,615 0.037 0
T.O.B. EL.=
D.H.W. EL.=
W.Q. EL.=
TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
14,004 SF
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
0.75 IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
875 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
4.48 FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
907 CF
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: Belle Aqua Villas I,0327,25YR,24HR,PRE
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.32 ac.
SCS Curve Number 86.89
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
.
.
'<:t
C\l
C\l
C\l
0
C\l
4=
OJ N
W ..- 0)
" L!)
c.. a:5
ci
:::: ro
'<t CD 15
N ..-
ci :>
>-
III
N l/l
...:- 1:
N '<:t
M ..- ~ ..-
3 ~ N
III 5
i!! Q) j.i
:> C\l .5 C\l
<ll
11l ..-1- Q.
::l -
C" 0
<l: <ll
~ E
(jj i=
co
:::: .JQ
c.. u
<l: L!)
" '<t
OJ N
<.? ~
0
"
Cl j.i
>- C\l
::t: <ll
CD Q.
0
'<:t
~C\l
o
o
(sp) :uoun~
.
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: Belle Aqua Villas I,0327,2SYR,24HR,POST
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.32 ac.
SCS Curve Number 90.59
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
.
.
"<t
N
N
N
0
N
~
~ CO L!)
(/) ..- .....
0 .....
a.. oj
ci
:::t: Cii
"<t (0
N -0
ci ):
>-
It)
N en
...: 1:
N "<t
M ..- ~
3- <Il N
..... .....
III E
~ CD .i.::
:> N.~ ro
OJ
(Il ..-1- 0-
:J '0
CT
~ OJ
2 E
(ij 0 i=
CO
:::t: J!l
a.. ()
~ L!)
IX: N
co "-
e> "!
0
IX:
Cl .i.::
>- ro
:::t: OJ
(0 0-
0
m"<t
N
,,0
o
(sp) uoun~
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED &. SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas I,0327,25YR,24HR,POST
HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area 1,615.00 ft2
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 1,174.00 ft3
Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) 9.00
Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base 0.00 ft
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 2.50 ft
Elevation of Starting Water Level 4.00 ft
Elevation of Pond Bottom 4.00 ft
Is there overflow ? Y
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.10
Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 8.40 ft/d
Factor of Safety 2.00
Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 14.00 ft/d
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.20
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench 1.00
Time Increment During Storm Event 1.00 hrs
Time Increment After Storm Event 6.00 hrs
Total Number of Increments After Storm Event 6.00
Runoff Hydrograph File Name: 327post.scs
Time of Peak Runoff: 12.08 hrs
Rate of Peak Runoff: 1.27 ds
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left Right
Groundwater Control Features - Y IN N N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Impervious Barrier - Y IN I N N N N 0.00 I
Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00
I
I
i
I
I
.
.
MODRET
ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas I,0327,25YR,24HR,POST
Structure Type: BROAD CRESTED
Crest Elevation 4.48 ft
Crest Length 8.00 ft
Coefficient of Discharge 3.31
Weir Flow Exponent 1.50
Number of Contractions 0.00
Design High Water Level Elevation 4.60 ft
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas I,0327,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
00.00 - 1.88 2.500 0.000 *
0.00000
1.88 2.500 0.04812
0.04215
2.88 4.000 0.03617 0.00
0.03020
3.88 4.000 0.02692 0.00
0.02363
4.88 4.000 0.02200 0.00
0.02036
5.88 4.000 0.01958 0.00
0.01879
6.88 4.000 0.01863 0.00
0.01848
7.88 4.000 0.01877 0.00
0.01906
8.88 4.024 0.01985 0.00
0.02063
9.88 4.124 0.02231 0.00
0.02398
10.88 4.281 0.02714 0.00
0.03031
11.88 4.514 0.02989 597.43
0.02947
12.88 4.583 0.02460 3742.10
0.01974
13.88 4.528 0.02025 4747.70
0.02077
14.88 4.506 0.02041 5 161.90
r
I
I
I
,
I
I
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas I,0327,25YR,24HR,POST
LUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
0.02005
15.88 4.499 0.01771 5.426.40
0.01527
16.92 4.497 0.01633 5,645.20
0.01735
17.92 4.495 0.01656 5,814.30
0.01577
18.92 4.493 0.01555 5.956.10
0.01532
19.92 4.492 0.01499 6,080.40
0.01466
20.92 4.491 0.01440 6 188.20
0.01414
21.92 4.490 0.01426 6282.70
0.01438
22.92 4.490 0.01375 6 373.20
0.01313
23.92 4.489 0.01346 6.452.80
0.01378
24.92 4.482 0.01330 6.470.30
0.01038
30.92 4.368 0.00945 6.470.30
0.00852
36.92 4.273 0.00789 6.470.30
0.00726
42.92 4.193 0.00679 6.470.30
0.00633
48.92 4.123 0.00596 6 470.30
.
.
-l
I
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas I,0327,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (ds) (ft3)
0.00560
54.92 4.062 0.00531 6,470.30
0.00501
60.92 4.006 6,470.30
II Maximum Water Elevation: 4.583 feet @ 12.88 hours
* Time increment when there is no runoff
Maximum Infiltration Rate: 1.861 ftjday
Recovery @ > 60.920 hours
.
.
o
CD
L.O
L.O
0
L.O
I-
m L.O
0 """
o.~
0::
:r:
'<:t
~ 0
0:: """
>-
10
N. ~
"
N L.O co
M ll:!
q, C") '<:t
--.
(J) II
m '-
<C -S c
..J Q) .Q
..J oE ro
:> >
C") ._ Q)
<C I- ill
:> '-
~ Q)
ro
w L.O S
N
..J X
..J C1l
W ~
co
0
Z N
0
j::
<C
0::
I- L.O
..J T"""
u::
Z
0
L.O
L.O
"""
"""
(lJ) UO!lBAaI3 JalBM
.
.
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
Belle Aqua Villas I
PROJECT NO.:
327
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. =
907 C.F.
4.48 NGVD
4.00 NGVD
3.00 NGVD
0.09 FT/MIN
14 FT
6 INCH
WATER QUALITY AREA (SF] 2,177 S.F.
VOLUME PROVIDED =
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. =
BOTTOM AREA (SF) = 1.6!5 S.F.
UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. =
COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) =
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN =
SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN =
ELEV. AVG.HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER AREA FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME
FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN.
4.48 2,177
1.17 0.12 2.75 0.43 22 0.84 253 300
4.36 2,037
1.05 0.12 2.75 0.38 22 0.76 236 312
4.24 1,896
0.93 0.12 2.75 0.34 22 0.67 219 327
4.12 1,756
0.81 0.12 2.75 0.29 22 0.58 202 347
4.00 1,615
TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME =
910
C.F.
TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME =
21.5
HOURS
Nonhsille
s~ Sew.lcU 11te.
.
CIVIL ·
LAN D PLANNI NG ·
ENVIRONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
r.::'\^ . . . 1 \1.f1 rE I'..
I n I.....'.L,j. :..' .~'Ju..h...J :~ ;1
I L i: - ; :!
.Ij,:! I"" ..~.n !:\!\
I. "" All,., 1 x ;0,.3 ,., I
~': 1\ ;i t..... .~..IN j'.; '.: ;
- -! I ...-/
'.u'---;~~:-;:-~~'~~_:~~.,.'1,..tl';"'~ ~ ...
hJ"'j.~d<:, :'>. V:.,ti C!';:~.~ I ",liG::;,
Cl r (0':: (I t!:,RNr\i ER
Date:
August 18, 2003
To:
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: FLD2003-06030 & PL T2003-00004 - Belle Aqua Villas I
125 Brightwater Drive
N ES Project # 0327
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
o Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date
15
15
15
15
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this proiect.
Copi
By:
t Administrator
601 CLEVELAND STREET SUITE 930
CLE,\RWATER, FLORI DA 33755
NES/",DMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 ' 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
CL W CoverSheet
.
.
FLD2003-06030
125 BRIGHTW A TER DR
Date Received: 6/18/2003
BELLE AQUA VILLAS
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
JUN I 8 2003 ~
Pt.~ N v,,~
. ---enva:et.ENiWA1" R
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
PL T2003-00004
125 BRIGHTW A TER DR
Date Received: 6/20/2003
BELLE AQUA VILLAS
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
r<) ~ 'C 'C . e-
o .; 0 = .; =
0 ~ ~ = = ..J
~ 00 =- II'i =- II'i .S-
c:'! ... on ... ..
00 0 = 0 = "
= = ~
- r- = C"'t N~ = C"'t f'i
-- 9- e e "
\0 - ...... - ......
- E ~ E ~
< <
-; -;
... ....
e 'C =
Eo< G.l E--
E .:=
G.l = ....
G.l U =
::: ~ 0 ~
'" e
G.l l-< C
e = ~ tl) ~
z ::l e ~ ~ 0
= == ..e =- :0:;
!l .~
u N a.
~ 1.0
N a.
~ - CO
'<t Q)
fii r<)
I ~
~ 0
- '0
~ 0
Q)
e E
Z 0
E .u
If) .. --
.- ::::l
00 = E 0
=
~ e Ci5 Q)
If) U a.~
0
0 CO 0
...-
0 ..$2 ~
0
0 l'f"l e I-c:~
0 = z :E .Q Q)
= ... O::Cijti:
0 =
0 N = - WU"'"
-- e - a.=0
0 QC) u r- <C a. c: .....
0 "'"" u - 0
-- < r<) I-g-~
~ ~
0 = Oc:- tl)
0 ~ zCO= i?Jl
(1)...3: c..
N ....
~ = _O::::l
~ e (1)::0
.. Z -0.>-
=1:1: - :E: .- ~
ell ~
..... = I-Q)c:
..... u U CO
C. l-< ..
..... ~ = ~~
~ CO Q)
(j .!a ~
~ = 0
~ e U (/l.-
a. ~ .- >
.C ,D <><:l ~~
..... Q)
u X E--
'" ~ .0
G.l ffi
Q .... ~
~u
C;~ c:
0
~ .....:lE-< ~
~z
e >~ .S:2
U ~~ a.
= Q~ a.
~ <0 CO
.. '<t .!a
Eo< 0 I~
.. ~
G.l l-
t;'
=-
0
r<)
0
1.0
0
I
r<)
e 0
Z 0 'C ~
N e
~ G.l Q -= u
'" c.; II ]
E ~ .....:l
U .... .... ::s u
G.l =
...
.... E
G.l
= ~
::l ~
=-
.
"'0
cfcl
en
-l
::T
(ii"
Q)
"'0
"'0
0'
!a
(,-
::3
~
c-
CD
Ci3;!
$, (ij'
~ (ij'
CD Q)
a.~
Q) CD
::3o-l
a. ~, :J:
,<'0 _
o-en
cC)'-
=:....(1)
_. Q) Z
=::30
iQ)-I
:g)>
~="'tI
c!:om
:::!l!a;;tl
~o'~
::3 -I
PA 0' .
- ....
o Q)
9'"'0
CD CD
....
g ~,
--
0'
o
3
CD
S.
9'
CD
Q)
"'0
"'2.
~r
-
0'
::3
o
....,
-
~~
~>
tr:1tJ
~tr:1
~~
--31'
zS6
(')~
~
--3
Ro
"d
Dl
"'l
3
~
=
....
~
=
....
~
.
(')
;-
(")
~
w
-
\0
W
e'
"d
~
'"
o
=
~
a
=-
=
Q.
"'Cl
~
"'
..,
=
~
==
lI':'
Z
=
>
f)
f)
=
=
s.
z
=
(""l
=
==
=
a
z
c
=
~
~
f)
"'
<'
"'
Q.
"d
Dl
"'l
~
=
....
'"
t"'
Si'
"'
....
....
"'
a
>-3
=
....
~
"d
~
N
o
o
W
I
o
o
o
o
~
t"'
S'
"'
='
~ ~
"'
z
c
~
~
t")
~
....
"'0
.....
=t:t::
t::l..
=
~
~
..
~
N
o
QO
.....:ItH
--0
....0
::::!O
NO
Qo
ffio
o
o
o
o
0"1
\0
0"1
~
> >
~ ~ w
{;/9 (;/9 - -...)
(") --
~ 0\ 0\ = 0\ 0\ = - -
= 0 == = 0 == VI -...)
(") = 0 .... = 0 .... --
n "'Cl "'C:l 0 N
~. = '=> e. = '=> ~ "d 0
~ = 0 = 0 Q: ~ 0
Q. w
>-3
..,
~
==
(""l
=
Q.
"'
"d ~
... "'
i~. ~
~
S'
--< ==
"d
-
a
o
-
o
I
W
~
-
N
~
o
~
m
~
~
f)
8
a.
z
c
Nonhsile
&~ Sew<<u 1He,
.
CIVIL ·
LAND PLANN ING ·
ENVI RON MENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date:
To:
June 18, 2003
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn:
Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference:
Belle Aqua Villas - 125 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0327
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
o Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date Description
13 Full Set of Civil Plans (7sheets), Architectural
Elevations and Landscape Plans(Copies
provided by others)
13 ORC Application w/required submittal
attachments
1 Check for application fee
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this proiect.
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLE,A,RWATER, FLORI DA 33755
NES),DMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
e _
CITY OF CLEARWATER
,
-.
LoNG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
September 17,2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case FLD FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004 - 125 Brightwater
I>rive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.8
feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building),
from 20 feet to 15.6 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an
increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to
back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and existing dock for
sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and
conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BllljONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
I
~
'\
.
.
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Two
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any
permits, including a detail for the wet standpipe;
4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5. That revised lot grading details, including swales and inverts conveying runoff to the pond at
the rear of the site, be submitted, to the satisfaction of Stormwater Engineering Department,
prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy; and
7. That revised landscape plans, including details showing the relationship of the proposed
driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations to ensure proper transitioning and
installation methods to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, be submitted prior to the
issuance of any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on October 1,2003 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
,
..
l.
.
.
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Three
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
~m.clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases\Up for the next CDBlBrightwater 125 Belle Aqua Villas 1\Brightwater 125
Development Order. doc
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
September 12, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
60 I Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development
approval (FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004) to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the
side (east) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from
10 feet to 4.8 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to
building), from 20 feet to 15.6 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and
with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and existing
dock for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots at 125
Brightwater Drive.
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 15.6 feet (to
pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet
to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three
existing boat slips and existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval
for six lots for property located at 125 Brightwater Drive has been scheduled to be reviewed by the
Community Development Board on September 16,2003.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112
South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
!JcereIY,
wa~~ W~l;,~~
Senior Planner
I\MS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBrightwater 125 Belle Aqua Villas 1\Brightwater 125
CDB Letter.d{).C
BRIAN). AUNGST, lVL\.YOR-\..,OMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL)ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
~Ionhside
&~ s~ 1Ht,
.
CIVIL.
LAND PLANNING.
ENVI RONMENTAL ·
TRANSPORTATION ·
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 21, 2003
To: City of Clearwater - Public Works Administration
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn: D. Scott Rice, P.E., Land Development Engineering Manager
Reference: FLD2003-06030 & PL T2003-00004 - Belle Aqua Villas I
125 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0327
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
o Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
(X) Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies
15
Date
Description
Revised C5.1 for COB submittal
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this proiect.
Copies To: File
': "'~ r-.....\...,..
By' ......~ i\ ) i\..... \", __...d''''''_
. 'D~ra -H~rris>proj~Ct~~~Tni~ra~
601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930
CLEARWATER, FLORI DA 33755
N ESADMI N@MINDSPRING.COM
N ESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
.
.
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
July 23,2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with
reductions of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and
from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet
to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.3 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet
(to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to
permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C
(retaining three existing boat slips and dock for sole use by the property owners) and
Preliminary Plat approval for six lots (Case Nos. FLD2003-06030 and PLT2003-00004,
125 Brightwater Drive).
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit
attached dwellings with reductions ofthe side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to
building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from
20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.3 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet
(to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit
parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat
slips and dock for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots at
125 Brightwater Drive. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is complete, but with the following submissions or revisions
necessary:
1. The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation
7.9. With existing elevations at 4.9 on the east side and 5.0 on the west side, and
proposed elevation changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the
building, this means on the east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential.
Are the edges of the driveways on the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross
sections at these locations.
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
..
e
e
July 23, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
2. Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is
2.4 feet between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.2 feet grade
differential on the west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally
constructed.
3. Provide a cross section through the proposed new retention pond. Retention
basinlunderdrain detail (1) on Sheet C6.1 does not match retention basin design on Sheet
C4.1. Revise/ make consistent.
4. General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site
design. If not used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match
proposed site design.
5. Section A-A on Sheet C4.1 incorrect. Proposed garage elevation is correctly shown at
8.0, but existing grade at the property line is 5.0 feet or less. Revise Section A-A to
reflect the existing condition and reality of the proposal.
6. Denote on Sheet C2.1 the type(s) of trees on-site and on adjacent property.
7. Since this development is being subdivided/resubdivided, Section 3-1908.A states that
"The city may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-
way be relocated and/or placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is
redeveloped." Also noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a
subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be underground
unless such undergrounding is not practicable." Existing development along Brightwater
Drive is served by aboveground utilities. With the transformation of Brightwater Drive,
these aboveground utilities need to be placed underground. Address on Sheets C2.1 and
C5.1.
8. Waterfront visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The
triangle is a 45 degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on
the water and along the side property line. Revise.
9. Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in elevation from
livable area to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations,
including waterfront visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
10. Building Code requires an 18-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
11. Revise Sheet C 1.1 for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is
proposed and discussed in the narrative.
12. Dimension building on Sheet C3.1 and on Sheets E-1 and E-2. Unclear where rear wall
of building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
13. Show on Sheets E-1 and E-2 the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof, not
top of truss) from the required FFE (base flood elevation).
14. Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheets E-1 and E-2 is
necessary. There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be
muted by any landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on
the front and rear elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as
part ofthe cornice, molding underneath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions
..
.
.
July 23, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
of wall, quoins and like architectural elements. Architectural elements on side elevations
should be consistent with and complement front and rear elevations. Concern: Elevations
provided by Donoghue Wood & Associates Inc. Architects look extremely similar to
those provided for project at 116 Brightwater Drive by Douglas W. Lowe, P.E. Building
plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
15. Revise Sheet C1.1 under "usage" to provide the correct square footage of each unit (not
1,020 square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 18.66 dwelling units per acre.
16. Provide the proposed color of railings. Provide color samples of building and
architectural elements. Colored rendering of building submitted doesn't match front
elevation for ground floor (make consistent).
17. Make name of project consistent (elevations refer to Bella Aqua Villas versus Belle Aqua
Villas). Also, since 116-120 Brightwater is referred to as "Belle Aqua Villas II," suggest
amending name to "Belle Aqua Villas I" so as to not confuse.
18. On the Preliminary Plat Sheet C1.1A, provide the existing legal description of the subject
property.
19. Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet C1.1 and Sheet C3.1 to indicate the proposed side
setback to pavement (believed to be five feet).
20. The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing dock and three boat slips. Site
inspection reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these existing boats be
removed? By when? Please address existing versus proposed circumstances with the
dock/slips.
21. The narrative for General Applicability Criteria #1 (on page 1 of narrative) states that
"The proposed side setback reductions are less intrusive than that of the existing motel
use." This is partially true, from a "ground plane" standpoint. These existing setbacks
are qualified from the standpoint that the motel is one-story in height. The proposed
building (at the proposed reduced setback) is overwhelming due to the proposed bulk of
the building at four stories. Revise narrative to speak to the existing versus proposed
character when relating to setback reductions and character of the site generally (existing
versus proposed).
22. Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway configurations, proposed
setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for meaningful landscaping, much
less making it "tropical." There is no landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the
building due to proposed site characteristics. Revise comments and/or address proposed
conditions in narrative under all appropriate criteria.
23. Comment: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided
through garage parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even
temporarily) outside the garage within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with
these proposed townhomes. Different than single-family detached dwellings where on-
street parking by guests is possible, the site design of these attached dwellings
(townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street parking by guests unless
driveways are blocked.
.
.
.
July 23, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 4
24. Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet.
Provide justification as part of narrative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-
to-four stories over parking).
25. Revise the survey to include the base flood elevation. Also include such information on
Sheet C 1.1.
26. Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This
site is indicated at 1,207 square feet, yet the project at 125 Brightwater Drive (which is
extremely similar) is indicated at 1,439 square feet, or smaller by 232 square feet. One or
both projects appear wrong. Revise.
27. Unclear why a five-foot wide sidewalk is proposed within the right-of-way while 116
Brightwater Drive has a four-foot wide sidewalk proposed. Make consistent.
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by
noon on August 18, 2003 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on August 14,
2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate
time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any
questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
*Make us your favorite!
Sincerely,
:;Z~ w~~,~~
Senior Planner
\IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next DRCIBrightwater 125 Belle Aqua Villas J\Brightwater 125
Complete Letter 7.23.03.doc
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
June 24, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building), from
10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to two feet (to boardwalk), a reduction
of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 5.5 feet (to boardwalk) and from 20 feet to 11.5
feet (to pools) and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the east and west sides from
five to 3.8 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-
way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots (Case Nos. FLD2003-06030
and PLT2003-00004, 125 Brightwater Drive).
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit
attached dwellings with a reduction of the side (east and west) setbacks from 10 feet to 3.8 feet
(to building), from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to two feet (to boardwalk)
and a reduction of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 5.5 feet (to boardwalk) and from 20
feet to 11.5 feet (to pools) and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the east and west sides
from five to 3.8 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way,
as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots at 125 Brightwater Drive. After a preliminary
review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further
development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application
is deemed complete. The next submittal deadline is July 16, 2003 (noon) to be reviewed for
sufficiency by the Development Review Committee (DRC) on August 14,2003.
The following items and/or information are required in order to make your application complete:
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER @ BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
J1.
12.
J 3.
)4.
J S.
J 6.
)7.
In
;""7.
10.
Jll.
.
.
June 24, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
8.
Letter of Authorization states that Robert W. and Donna L. DeStefano are the owners of
the property. Only one person signed the letter (for both persons). The letter must be
signed by both owners and notarized.
Please submit the application fee of $600.00 for the Preliminary Plat.
Provide existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines.
Provide a proposed grading plan, including finished floor elevations and all details,
including cross sections of swale on either side of building.
Provide a copy of the Permit inquiry letter or SWFWMD permit submittal, as well as a
copy of any State or County stormwater system tie-in permits (if applicable).
Provide an existing tree survey of the subject property and for property within 25 feet of
the subject property. Site and landscape plans must detail whether the existing trees are
being preserved or removed.
Provide on Sheet C 1.1 the square footage and percentage of the vehicular use area for
interior greenspace.
Must submit for Comprehensive Landscape Program and make part of "request" to
reduce the required landscape buffer width along the east and west property lines from
five to 3.8 feet, addressing criteria.
Provide irrigation plan.
On the Preliminary Plat Sheet C1.1A, provide the legal description of the subject
property, any proposed easements, the names of adjoining plats (appropriately positioned)
and the dimensions and are of each lot and common area.
Provide a total of 13 copies of the Preliminary Plat.
While not part of a completeness review, I have provided preliminary information about the
~mfficiency of the applications. More comments will be provided by the DRC once the
applications are deemed complete.
j~General Comments related to the sufficiency of the application:
" 1. The proposed building is located within the sight visibility triangle (20'x20"). Relocate
the building outside of the visibility triangle. Note: While the minimum front setback in
the Tourist District is 15 feet for attached dwellings, other townhomes approved on
Brightwater Drive have provided a minimum front setback of 20 feet to the garages.
Additionally, the front stairs are also located within the visibility triangles. Any required
railing and balustrade should be as open as possible, while meeting Building Code
requirements, within the visibility triangle.
2. Stairs cannot extend more than three feet into a required setback without requesting a
setback reduction for the stairs. Redesign or request a setback reduction(s) (front and/or
rear), including justification for the requested reduction.
j 3. Since pools are to be individually owned, provide details how each pool will be protected
per the Building Code with fencing. Show on site plans and in any other documentation
necessary. Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in
r----...
.
.
June 24, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
l4.
)5.
I€)
'7.
18.
/9.
IlO.
hI.
112.
j 13.
/14.
.115.
q@)
j
17.
1]8.
)19.
120.
elevation from livable area to ground elevation. Ensure compliance with all other
regulations, including waterfront visibility triangles.
Show on site plan Sheet C3.1 the waterfront visibility triangles at the southeast and
southwest property comers.
Plunge pool and rear wall designs are different on Sheet LA-I than the civil plans.
Revise one or both to match.
Building Code requires an 18- foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
Provide explanation as to purpose of six-foot wide boardwalk. If to provide access to
dock from individual units, it is unclear how the unit owners will access the boardwalk
(ie: sidewalk; or walk across the grass). Explain why the boardwalk must be six feet
wide. If the width of six feet is to meet ADA requirements, only access to boardwalk is
via stairs from individual units (?). If boardwalk is to provide access to dock, why isn't
dock being widened to provide ADA accessability?
Unclear as to how the six-foot wide boardwalk will be supported at south edge of
boardwalk (ie: posts and beams?). Will actual boardwalk construction (assuming
utilizing posts and beams) affect the drainage capacity, function or maintenance of the
drainage system? Advise/provide details.
Based on underdrain clean-out detail on Sheet C6.1 and retention basin detail on Sheet
C4.1, unclear how underdrain will be able to be cleaned out with boardwalk above as
designed. Advise/revise. See also comment #8 above.
Retention basinlunderdrain detail (1) on Sheet C6.1 does not match retention basin design
on Sheet C4.1. Revise/ make consistent.
General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site
design. If not used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match
proposed site design.
Driveway widths must be a minimum of nine feet wide (Traffic Department recommens
10 feet width) and must be provided with flairs meeting Engineering Department
standards.
Cannot find demolition notes 4-9 on the site plan on Sheet C2.1.
Shade the subject property on Sheet C 1.1.
On Sheet C 1.1 it is stated that rear setback is 5.25 feet to boardwalk. Show dimension on
Sheet C3.1 and on retention basin detail on Sheet C4.1.
Dimension building on Sheet C3.1 and on Sheets E-1 and E-2. Unclear where rear wall
of building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
Provide distance from property line to fire hydrant on Sheet C5.1.
If existing docks are to be reused for residents, then provide a fire line and riser to dock
on Sheet C5.1.
Indicate on Sheets E-I and E-2 which side elevation is "east" and "west" elevations.
Show on Sheets E-1 and E-2 the proposed building height (midpoint of pitched roof).
Indicate required FFE (base flood elevation). Also indicate FFE on Sheet C3.1 for livable
..
J21.
@
i23.
i24.
./25.
./26.
l27.
I
J 28.
J 29.
30.
31.
.
.
June 24, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 4
area. If height is 44' - 7", then change Sheet C 1.1 for proposed building height (ensure
consistency of information).
Sheets E-l and E-2 - If building is 73+/- feet deep, side elevations at rear are unclear
regarding stair/wall/pool circumstance, nor do they show stairs at front of building.
Revise/advise.
Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheets E-l and E-2 is
necessary. There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be
muted by any landscaping or architectural features.
Sheets E-l and E-2 - Having trouble understanding front and side elevations regarding
roof lines in relation to vertical planes. Revise as necessary. Provide floor plans and
sections to assist in explanation of height and roof lines.
Provide on Sheet C 1.1 the proposed density in terms of units/acre.
Provide on Sheet C1.1 or Sheet C3.1 the square footage for each unit;~ statement (or
show location on Sheet C3.l) as to the location and type of outdoor lighting to be
provided (if any)/a statement that individual trash cans (black barrels) will be used and
stored in the individual garages; ,land a statement that no signage is proposed for this
development.
Amend Sheet C 1.1 for Gross Floor Area and FAR for "existing" and "proposed" to
"N/A."
Amend Exhibit "A" of the application - "Description of Request" states that three
existing boat slips will remain, yet under General Applicability Criteria #1 on the same
Page 1 states two slips. Amend to appropriate number.
On Sheet C3.l there is indicated a landscape strip of approximately three feet in width
between driveways, however, on Sheet LA-l there is no landscaping provided within this
landscape area.
Existing motel is served by overhead power and communication lines, including a power
pole adjacent to Brightwater Drive. Sheet C2.1 does not state that the power pole will be
removed, nor does the application state whether above ground or underground electric
and communication lines will be proposed.
Suggest utilizing bronze anodized aluminum window and door frames to match railings.
Provide greater detail of proposed color of building elements (columns, pilasters, etc.).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
~~~;s~
Senior Planner
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX1Pending cases I Up for the next DRCIBrightwater J 25 Belle Aqua VillaslBrightwater J 25
Incomplete Letter 6.24. 03. doc
. . .
LL
0
>-
f-
-
U
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
lA~~~ ~\~
1'0:_
FAX:
,. 44 \0 - ~03\.
Phone: t+":!a - 2- ~ ~ ,
FROM: W~:r~ Wt\h Phone: SIo'2.-+51)4-.
DATE:~ ~\t.\D\O~ RE:~Z-) Df'\jht~W Dr.
MESSAGE: C~~L~ (\~\l~) ~
CJt"'\~,~\ \1L\.) ~.,\~.
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) S-
~____~u_~ .
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 06/26/2003 12:46
NAME PLAN
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
DATE, TH~E
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
06/26 12:43
94468036
00:03:02
05
OK
STANDARD
ECM
.
.
OR/S/)J
'V4(
CDB Meeting Date: September 16. 2003
Case Number: FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004
Agenda Item: D3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNERS:
Robert W. and Donna L. DeStefano
APPLICANT:
Anthony Menna
REPRESENTATIVE:
Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
LOCATION:
125 Brightwater Drive
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with
reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to
building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and
from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear
(south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to
15.6 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk)
and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet,
and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-
of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing
boat slips and existing dock for sole use by the property owners)
and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.32 acres; 14,004 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
112 feet of width along Brightwater Drive by 120 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Overnight accommodations
Attached townhome dwellings
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-060301PL T2003-00004 - Page 1
.
.
PLAN CATEGORY:
RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
T, Tourist District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings (townhomes - approved by CDB and
soon to be constructed)
West: Overnight accommodation
East: Attached dwellings (townhomes - approved by CDB and
soon to be constructed)
South: Water
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses dominate
Brightwater Drive.
ANALYSIS:
The square site is 0.32 acres located on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 500
feet east of Hamden Drive. It is located along a highly developed area within Clearwater Beach
and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the Small Motel District of
Beach By Design, which provides for the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes
and timeshares between two and four stories above parking.
The proposal includes constructing a six-unit, four-story townhome building. The building will
contain four floors of living area above base flood elevation, with the two-car garage on the
ground-level. Each unit will be approximately 3,171 square feet in area. The parking within the
building will include two garage spaces per unit. Each unit will have a singlewide driveway (10
feet wide). The design requires that cars back out into the right-of-way to exit the site. The
Community Development Code prohibits "back out" parking for any uses other than detached
dwellings. The driveway length will permit a vehicle to completely "back out" of the garage,
thus eliminating the garage walls as a potential view obstruction of the sidewalk and street. The
development will operate as, and have the characteristics of, single-family detached homes,
including the individual garages. The site is located on Brightwater Drive, which is a cul-de-sac
street approximately 1,700 in length and generally used only by persons with a destination on the
street. From a traffic standpoint, this concept of "back out" parking for townhomes may be
acceptable on a low volume cul-de-sac street such as this. It should not be considered, however,
as a precedent for deviation from the Code provision of restricting "back out" movement into the
right-of-way for single-family residential uses only, and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
The request is to permit attached dwellings with reductions ofthe side (east) setback from 10 feet
to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west)
setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 15.6
feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004 - Page 2
.
.
height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public
right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C. The reductions in side setback is a function of the unit width of 17' -8", which
is generally a standard unit width. The reduction in the rear setback to 17 feet for the building is
actually to a raised pool deck area. The reduction in the rear setback to 15.6 feet is to the
individual "plunge" pools. The actual building's southeast corner is approximately 28 feet from
the rear property line, which exceeds the minimum setback of 20 feet. The rear setback reduction
is otherwise to provide pedestrian access to the water and existing docks. The increase in
building height is still in compliance with Beach by Design, which allows townhomes two- to
four-stories in height.
The Italian villa-style architecture of the buildings will include ground floor copper beech-color
stucco with a faux millet (beige) wall color stucco above the ground floor, and alabaster (off-
white) banding, cornices, top rail/balusters and window/door frames. Both the front and rear
elevations are provided with a number of windows. The building will also be articulated with
unit entries recessed from the front fa9ade, accessed from the ground/first floor by individual
stairs with a small third-floor balcony above. On the rear of the building, units will be provided
with a balcony on the second floor and a "roof-top" deck on the fourth floor.
The landscape plan meets Code requirements, utilizing a variety of a colorful groundcover
(including gold mound and purple trailing lantana and emerald blanket), shrubs (including
hibiscus, plumbago and cocoplum) and trees (including washingtonia palms, queen palm,
paurotis palm and silver buttonwood). Additional details showing the relationship of the
proposed driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations will be necessary prior to the
issuance of any permits to ensure proper transitioning and installation methods. Revised lot
grading details, including swales and inverts conveying runoff to the pond at the rear of the site,
will also be required to be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits.
Solid waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and
Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
applicant will be selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat
prior to the issuance of building permits. With this proposal, the existing dock and three boat
slips (presently leased to non-resident boat owners) will be retained. The applicant proposes to
discontinue the leases prior to construction of the townhomes. Use of the dock and slips should
be for residents and their guests only and not sub-leased. A detail of the fire standpipe riser
adjacent to the boat slips/dock will be necessary prior to the issuance of any permits for this
project. Proposed utility facilities (electric and communication lines) on-site and existing
aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way will be required to be placed
underground, or provisions made for placing the utilities underground (including interim
construction details to be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy)
within timeframes acceptable to the City.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030IPLT2003-00004 - Page 3
.
.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-801.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units per 10 overnight six dwelling Yes
acre (nine units)/ 40 accommodation units (18.66
overnight units dwelling units
accommodation per acre)
units per acres (12
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.59 0.74 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 14,004 square 14,004 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 112 feet 112 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A North: 19.8 feet North: 20 feet (to Yes
SETBACK (to building); building)
zero feet (to
pavement)
REAR N/A South: 19.8 feet South: 28 feet (to No - reductions
SETBACK (to building); 10 building); 17 feet requested
feet (to deck) (to pool deck);
15.6 feet (to
pool); zero feet
(to boardwalk)
SIDE N/A East: 6.9 feet (to East: 3.8 feet (to No - reductions
SETBACK building); zero building); 4.5 requested
feet (to feet (to
pavement) pavement)
West: 7.1 feet West: 3.8 feet (to
(to building); building); 4.8
zero feet (to feet (to
pavement) pavement)
HEIGHT N/A 1 0 feet 40.33 feet No - increase
maximum requested
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030/PL T2003-00004 - Page 4
.
.
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
PARKING Determined by 10 spaces 12 spaces (two Yes
SPACES the Community per dwelling
minimum Development unit)
Director based
on the specific
use and! or ITE
Manual standards
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803 (B)):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property is presently developed with an overnight accommodation use. The
proposal includes the redevelopment of the site with attached dwellings (townhomes).
The applicant desires to develop in an emerging, residential neighborhood with direct
access to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf. The subject site is located within the "Small
Motel District" as identified in Beach by Design, which anticipates the redevelopment of
Brightwater Drive with residential uses and timeshares.
The applicant will provide mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with Beach by
Design. A minimum of six townhomes of the size proposed is needed to make this
project financially feasible. The applicant desires a building residential in character. The
requested setback reductions and "back out" parking make the site more marketable and
usable resulting in a building consistent with Beach by Design. All surrounding properties
along Brightwater Drive currently have "back out" parking into the right-of-way. The
majority ofthose existing parking spaces for the surrounding properties are located within
the right-of-way. While the proposed parking for the townhomes will be within the
garages, vehicles will be able to park outside the garage without extending into the right-
of-way or over the public sidewalk.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The proposed residential townhomes will help stabilize and likely enhance property
values in the area. The current assessed valuation of the site is $600,000. With the
redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at $3,000,000. This increase
in property value is expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004 - Page 5
.
.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater generally permits attached dwellings and specifically within the
Tourist District. The request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Proj ect due to the proposed reduction in setbacks and the proposed "back
out" parking.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Overnight accommodation uses generally presently dominate Brightwater Drive and are
located on the properties to the east and west. Brightwater Drive is being redeveloped
with attached dwellings, either in the form of townhomes or condominium flats. The
property to the north has been approved for nine townhomes with similar setbacks
proposed for the subject property. Within close proximity to the subject property are
three additional projects either on this same or a future CDB agenda also for townhomes.
Across the water to the south are single-family dwellings (zoned LMDR). The site is
located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which recommends the
redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and four stories above
parking. The proposal is to construct a six-unit, four-story attached dwelling building.
The building will contain four floors of living area above base flood elevation, with the
two-car garage on the ground-level. The proposal will aid in the revitalization of the
Brightwater Drive and Clearwater Beach as a whole. This location provides an
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater that is currently undergoing renewed
investment and redevelopment.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The location ofthe site, in relation to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico, makes it
uniquely and ideally suited for the proposed attached dwelling development. The
applicant desires to . locate a multi-family development with a single-family character
along waterfront property within an emerging, residential neighborhood. Properties with
these characteristics are limited within the City. The developer is also eager to construct
a project consistent with and encouraged by Beach by Design and is proposing a similar
project at 116 - 120 Brightwater Drive (on this same CDB agenda).
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The Italian villa-style architecture and landscape design will
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030/PL T2003-00004 - Page 6
.
.
complement other similar projects approved along Brightwater Drive. It may further
influence similar redevelopment efforts in the area.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive, redevelopment
changes of Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and
buildings. The site is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which
recommends the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and
four stories above required parking. The City will benefit by having an attractive building
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape enhancements will
significantly improve the site. The proposal incorporates well-articulated, unified
elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
construction of an attractive residential development. The proposed project reflects the
City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design.
The site is generally unmarketable and unusable without the requested allowance to
permit "back out" parking for attached dwellings and the requested side and rear setback
reductions.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Adequate parking will be provided on-site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible
Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or nine
spaces. The proposal includes two garage spaces per dwelling unit or 12 spaces.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3 (Beach by Design).
The proposed Italian villa architecture will be aesthetically pleasing, blending with other
similar projects to along Brightwater Drive. The proposed landscaping will lend in
differentiating Clearwater Beach from other beach areas. The residential design of the
proposed project will help to create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" along
Brightwater Drive.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004 - Page 7
.
.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with modest one and two-story multi-family dwellings and
overnight accommodations. This proposal includes luxury, attached dwellings utilizing
the existing boat slips and dock as an amenity. It will provide another positive
redevelopment example for the area along Brightwater Drive. The development complies
with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Tourist District. The site
is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design. Beach By Design includes
the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and four stories
above required parking. The proposal is consistent and in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character ofthe adjacent properties and with Beach by Design.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned Tourist District and the surrounding area is characterized by overnight
accommodation and multi-family dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed
development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The development
complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Tourist District.
The proposal is consistent with Beach By Design and with previously approved or
submitted residential projects with townhomes or condominium flats along Brightwater
Drive and encourage the like-redevelopment of other sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood, is permitted in the Tourist District and is encouraged Beach By Design.
The proposal includes six owner-occupied, attached dwelling (townhome) units with
landscaping and parking spaces meeting Code requirements, utilizing the existing boat
slips and dock.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposal includes developing the site with six attached dwellings (townhomes)
replacing the existing overnight accommodation use. Vehicle trip generation should
decrease over the former use with this proposal, will not have any significant, negative
impact on affected intersections or roadways and with no reduction in level of service
(LOS) on Brightwater Drive. The building is designed with a front setback of 20 feet
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030/PL T2003-00004 - Page 8
.
.
between the garage door and the proposed public sidewalk within the right-of-way,
permitting a vehicle to completely and safely "back out" of the garage. From a traffic
standpoint, the concept of "back out" parking may be acceptable on a low volume cul-de-
sac such as this. It should not be considered a precedent for deviation from the Code
provision of permitting "back out" movement into the right-of-way for single-family
detached dwellings only.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-
designed landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes constructing a new building with attractive architecture and well-
designed landscaping. An excess of parking will be provided. The level of service on
Brightwater Drive will not be degraded. Black barrels for trash will service the site,
which will be stored in the garages on non-trash pickup days.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on August 14, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement), reductions ofthe
side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20
feet to 15.6 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of
building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and existing dock for sole use
by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots for the site at 125 Brightwater
Drive, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Aoproval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-06030fPL T2003-00004 - Page 9
.
.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any
permits, including a detail for the wet standpipe;
4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5. That revised lot grading details, including swales and inverts conveying runoff to the pond at
the rear of the site, be submitted, to the satisfaction of Stormwater Engineering Department,
prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy; and
7. That revised landscape plans, including details showing the relationship of the proposed
driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations to ensure proper transitioning and
installation methods to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, be submitted prior to the
issuance of any permits.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBrightwater 125 Belle Aqua Villas I1Brightwater 125 Staff
Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-060301PL T2003-00004 - Page 10
(.r, ~
8 -<
N \0
;n ;t:
N
00 M
-
-
~;;o::
;: a c
II} 1,0""
.- 'T ....
~ ~ ~
>.;;~
......;; >
.~ E ....
;: ...:l :I:
C.J~5:2
-< .. 0::
Qi=l:l;al
II} Qi an
eo:: r'-l N
U ~ ..-
M
0
0
N
--
00
-
--
\0
~
Q)
::.::: ';>
'-' Q)
~~I ~
OIl
!:l
~
U
~
<+-<
ctl
~
0
-0 r--
'-' 0
.... 0
0
....l
~
"0
!a
.s
"0
'~
,~
~
..r:::
en
en
Q)
bh
!a
'5
,~
:E
'u;
';;
.E
CO
'u;
o
N
:><
b
'u; N
~ ~
E . 0
is i~
I::
'Q) ,
- _ N
~
'\71
~
E
en
;>.
~
Q)
;>
'C
"0
~
....
<8
en
S
o
Z
~. V ~ ~ 0 '= ~ . ,~:9 1::'
; ~ ~ I:: 1 o~ ~ ,;;Cj ~ o~ 0
':!! 5h u 0 'u; 'B I:: "0 ~ ~ "0 ~.....8 'R
;> Q)..... !;::;>'.2:! :.a Q) en .s <+=< '6
..... ;> ~ ~..r::: o~ .s..... '~.'o
g ~ ~ .g ~ ^ a'~ 5 '8 ~ .:: ~ 8 ~ ~
~ctl fr. ~~Q)~ '~ I:: 0Il<+=<~ ~
$ C" a:l q, ~ 0 ~ ..E ill ~ Q) 0 ~ 'C ctl ;; ca .
o ~ ~ 00= .....~....o 0 5& ~ ~~~~ co ~o
;:: ~ ^ 0 u' '<t '];(? <8 0.. ..r::: "0 ,- Q) Q) 0 p<::: 0 Q) - v
'~ .~ ~ ..... - M~ 0 en co.. k~..r::: ~ ~
~ <+=< ;>. ....02 CP<:::;>'a Q) ctll:: ~ ~enCjO ~ o~
..r::: I:: - ,8..... _ = ,",:0 '0 0.. 0 C !:l 0 ~' 0 l;:I gp
] ~ '~ :'~~ ~~~~ ~ ~'~ i@~~~~ j e'~~
~ en E iIlo..:o~~~,s E ..r:::~ 1::~~~<t:U ,- .~,~
"0 -g 0 en ;; -Q) ~ = <t: ctl '\71 -::::; S:! en t::'" ,;.: f3i ~....o 13 en, C
~ ctl C ~ '8,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ill 6.0 ~ ~ ~ Q) 0 <+=< B. ,s ~-€I
~ Q) en "O"O=>~o.e~ g ~Q) '<tP<:::[),.^OIl _0::.oen
~ ~ ~ ctll::~~enQ);>''''''o..r::: I::~ uCj"O&~~ ~uo~~
,- 5h ,- Q)ctl~P<:::~I::..r:::!a~co '-'\71 ~Z'~o'-~ o..v-Q)a
~ U ~13[)Cj1il;'::::Q)""~oo~~ ~~"O""~13 .... '1:::1::_
~ ~ Scenz~;>.~R>"O~~E ..r:::~o~~..r::: <850~~
;>. 0 ' '~~ I::~ ..r:::~ctlCQ)~ ~<t:!ctlQ)u -~Q) ~
g~~ ~ ~~!i~&~~P<:::~9~>~ 5~fri~~ J~~,s~
0Il~~ I:: ~_'-<t:....o~~Cj_~Q) 0....;>..... en~~--
I:: ..... b .E ,l!l ^ctl ~ !a ~ <8 a en "0 Z '1ij .....l ..E 0 -<. 0.. 5 ~ a '<t ... 'E en '0 a
'-~ '" M CO.Q '<t Q) en 0 ..... Q) 5 I:: ...... v '::;:i , ..:. - Q) ..... 'C 0 (J,) Ii) 0 - 'C
a M ~ 'u; Q) ~ o;S ]"0 . ~..r:::' 0 ~ "0 ...... 13 0 ~ '-Ci .s i;' 2 0..:3 6 u ::; - 0..
en~~Q)U'~ ~-9""'Su<t:ctlE-enQ)OI::UQ)~~Q)' uenf{3caQ)
~"Oi..r:::o;S!aMOsi~5.'];(iIl~'];(~8..s~,g~,~~,;.:,~a'];(aco~'~
~!a~gl::'\7I5=~~U~"OMctlOM o~~"go~oca~oM;>'coo~
~-a:l'-~~~<t:~~130Iz~~z~~~>~~p<:::~~p<:::~z~a~p<:::
~ ?: '~ ~., ~..r::: ~ Uo ~..r::: a:l ~..r::: ~:O ~ ~ I:: ~ OIl "0 ~.:....:i ~ ;3 ~ ~ ~
00 ~ ~ OOM~~ooN_Moo~~oo~~~~O~'C'~OO~~OONM~
~
i>
:i:
u
-<
~
"
u
rJi
i;'
~
:€J
~
.
M M
0 0
o~ o~
!:::l I !:::l I
~o:l ~~
-- --
00 00
~ ~I
I
o:l CI.l
~
z
o
o
Q)
!:l
o
Z
M
o
o
!:::l
N
N
--
00
00
~
0
Q)
~ ~
Z 0...
0
0
Q)
!:l
0
Z
M
0
0
N
--
N
N
--
00
M
0
0
N
--
on
--
00
M
0
0
N
--
00
-
--
\0
~
Q)
';>
Q)
~
co
's
Q)
~
'5lJ
!:l
~
0
00
0
0
0
....l
~
, :::E . . ~
r')
0
0 < i-
N \0 :~
---- ;:r:
lr) t>
N ..... -<
---- <;l ~
00 '"
..... U
.....
QJ)=
.s ~ 0::
...... = C
~\C'"
.... = ....
~ ~ ~
cg~
.... M ~
.=: 9 J:
't r~. C)
-< ":': D::
~=#:m
~ ~ an
~ {IJ ('II
u U ~
~~I
-0
u
I-
:::'::u
~I
r')
o
~Q
00 <I
.....
----
\0
~
o
Z
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
----
\0
C.
o
...
~
O/J
.s
t
;:l
~
o
E-<
... ~
~ ~
~o
lr)
r')
N
<
Q
.....l
~
r')
o
~~
;n~
N
----
t'-
~
~
>1.1
5
Q
11)
!::
o
Z
r')
o
o
N
----
r')
N
----
t'-
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
----
\0
<J)
<J)
11)
!::
11)
-
11)
]-
o
U
<+-<
o
...
11)
t
11)
.....l
o
r')
N
<
Q
.....l
~
r')
o
~Q
00 <I
.....
----
\0
11)
!::
o
Z
r')
o
o
~
00
.....
----
\0
~
o
"I::l
~
.0;
:::E
q
Q
""'"
""'"
N
<
Q
.....l
~
r')
o
~<
0; ~I
N
----
t'-
<
~I
>1.1
5
Q
o
~
::c:
r')
o
o
N
----
0\
N
----
t'-
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
----
\0
"I::l
u
11)
~
>.
11)
~
ell
11)
11)
...
E-<
00
.....
o
<
Q
.....l
~
r')
g~
s~
----
00
~
~
>1.1
Z
o
Q
11)
!::
o
Z
r')
o
o
~
.....
r')
----
t'-
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
----
\0
"I::l
11)
-
'"
11)
...
u
~
:::E
o
r')
.....
<
Q
.....l
~
r')
g~
s~
----
00
~
~
>1.1
Z
o
Q
~
::c:
r')
o
o
N
----
\0
.....
----
t'-
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
----
\0
!::
o
..p
'"
"E
u
~
U
11)
O/J
'"
.S "I::l
'" u
... 11)
Q~
\0
.....
o
<
:3
~
r')
o
~ ~I
.....
----
\0
~
::c:
r')
o
o
~
00
.....
----
\0
-
u
'"
S'
......
u
!E
'"
...
E-<
<.Q
.5 ~
>~
lr)
.....
o
<
Q
.....l
~
~
z
r')
g~
S~
----
00
~
~
>1.1
Z
o
Q
~
o
Z
r')
o
o
N
----
.....
----
00
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
----
\0
~
11)
.;;
~
~
O/J
11)
.....l
o
\0
o
Q
Q
.....l
~
r')
o
o
~
0\
N
----
t'-
r')
o
o
~
0\
N
----
t'-
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
\0
~
11)
....
;>
11)
~
11)
u
t3
o
<J)
11)
~
'"2
'"
.....l
o
lr)
o
Q
Q
.....l
~
1::
i
u
o
Z
<J)
.~
-
~
6
u
~
ell
r')
o
o ell
~>1.1
0\>1.1
.....
----
00
r')
o
~ <I
~~
----
t'-
<
~I
ell
>1.1
>1.1
ell
>1.1
>1.1
00
<+-<
o
N
11)
~
Cl..
>1.1
5
Q
>1.1
Z
o
Q
11)
!::
o
Z
~
o
Z
r')
o
o
N
----
0\
.....
----
00
r')
o
o
N
----
00
.....
----
\0
~
11)
.;;
11)
~
...
11)
-
'"
~
o
-
ell
o
.....
o
Q
Q
.....l
--:;
M ::;s . . ~
0
0 -< i-
N \0 '>
--- ;t: ~
V) "
N - ..;
--- r'1 :7l
00 '"
- U
-
~=D::
... ~ C
.... =
l;I;lI,C1V
... ~ ....
~ ~ ~
~=>
:.:: ~ :>
.::: 9 ~
"t ~ S:2
< .. D::
~=#:m
l;I;l ~ It)
~ ~ C\I
U U ~
a::l
o
-<
.~
-
;.c;
s
()
~
r/J
r'1
gp::
t:!~
;:;;0
---
r--
~
~
o
Z
r<)
o
---
-.::t
-
---
00
~
o
r<)
o
~~
;n~
N
---
r--
r'1
g~
s~
---
00
r'1
o
~~
;n~
N
---
r--
r'1
o
~~
;n~
N
---
r--
r'1
go
N ......
;::::;f-;
---
00
p::
~
o
~
~
~
~
~I
o
......
f-;
~
~
~
z
o
o
~
z
o
o
~
z
o
o
00
'+-<
o
r<)
II.l
gp
l:l..
~
5
o
~
z
o
o
~
5
o
II.l
;:::
o
Z
g
o
Z
g
o
Z
II.l
;:::
o
Z
II.l
;:::
o
Z
II.l
;:::
o
Z
r'1
o
o
N
---
-
r'1
---
r--
r'1
o
o
N
---
00
-
---
r--
r'1
o
o
N
---
00
-
---
\0
r'1
o
o
N
---
-.::t
-
---
00
r'1
o
o
N
---
-
---
00
r'1
o
o
N
---
-
---
00
r'1 r'1 r'1 r'1 r'1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
N N t:! N N
--- --- --- ---
00 00 00 00 00
- - - - -
--- --- --- --- ---
\0 \0 \0 \0 \0
~ ~ '"0
a II.l
II.l II.l >
:::.::: 'S: 'S: 'Q)
u II.l ~ E=: ()
~~I p:: c(l ~ ~
() II.l ;:::
- II.l
~ <IJ II.l ..... 0
0:1 .-= - > .....
~ 0:1 II.l -
<IJ 0 0:1
c(l :> p:: .~
~ :E II.l U g c..
0:1 "0 - p:: ~
p., Cf.l v.i 0 u
0 0 0 0 \0 0
-0 r'1 -.::t -.::t -.::t - -
u 0 0 - 0 0 0
t- o 0 -< -< 0 -<
0 0 0 0 0 0
.....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l .....:l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
---,
'(") ::;E
0
0 ~
N \0
--- ;:t:
V)
N -
--- (")
00
-
-
OJ)
==0::
;: a c
C'-lI,C'"
.... ~ ....
~ ('f') ~
~=<c
--lool = 3:
.S: Q ~
;: ~ J:
CJ~C)
< .. D::
QJ=#:m
C'-l Q.l It)
~ rI:l N
U ~ ~
~~I
-0
u
....
-....... . :5 OIl. ....... "0
:... C<l ~ o.S ..c _ _ I:l 0 -5;:., OJ
OJ ....... 00 OIl OJ,$ _ . 't5 ,~O\ -, o:! ~ '-.0 fa ..c
~ ~j13~113~1 E --g~ j~~ 8 ~'B~~~g i~! ~ ~13I:l~i~
g -5 ~ 8..;= "0 .B ~ (5 ~ 1:: 5b Ul "0 -6 ~ "0 '> o:! ~ e 8 'en u 'E -Eh ;n ,~12 ~ ~ .a ,0 rn"
=5 .~ ~ (2 ~ fa ~ OIl 7 ~ ,g ] @" ~:a ~ ~ ~ ].s c.!. 8.'~ :~ ~'~ ~ JS 13 ~ ]- <S .B ~ ~ ~ ,Q
= 601l~~i<'~~ .......~N't5~~g~ ~ ~.~9(2OO]ca~:~w~ o~ ~B~~
t) cO.s"2 8 OJ ,.~!;2 ~....... N ;:., ~ ~ I'" 8 '(' ~;::l.l!J ~,~ i]l.iij ....... ,- 0 - """-: ~ fa 8 , C<l"O ;::l
~ ~1:;.B]~~ ~@~l~~~: ~ ~r~~]~~~.~~;~ g~,~~~9~
B 8 OJ"O,g ~ 5 ~ e Ill! ~ ~ I _ ~ ~ as ~ ~ u 5 g ~ ;.= '~Cl := 0 "2 ~ 5b - V) -8 a I:l
. ..c u; 0 "0'::: OJ ~ ' ....._;.= 0 l::: ....... C<l OJ) ..c
] l~'~I~~j !~t.~~~j~ ~~~~!~!~jtI11~ j~i~i;~
OJ ~ ~ OJ r-- S "0 ~ U ~ """ OIl 0:; e..c .......- ,,-,' OIl OJ..c ;::l = ~ 'l::: 8_ -Eh .... ~ 'Ul C<l ~ '> ..c C<l ..c
.0 C<l r--.s '00 <<l"O 0 ........ OJ.c: ,00 . ~ ~ t) ,S .c: ....... 0 ~ 00 't5 OJ) 'C ........ ts ~,~ OJ OJ OIl OJ ,-::;:
.gJ o:!:= ~ '2:E 5b fa ~ ~ ~ .s ~ 13 OIl 51"0 '""' P S ~ r ,S ~ P.. 8 ~ t co .B::@ OJ >::'n ~ -5 ~ g::o ::>
.... 0 0 ....... ....... ... ....... ~ ._ ~ . u S ,- Pi! ~ OJ ' 00....... ~ OJ 0 "0 - "0 '';::: c75 "" OIl E .... 'C<l OJ
~ 11~~,~~~-B ~]~~~~~'>~.s~~~~il]~9~~~~~~,~,g.~~~,~
B 8. ~"O "0 6 OJ o:! Ul ~ 0 :; ~ OIl (l) ~ I """-: V) (l) ~ 'u ~....... '> -5 ca ;;> 9 ~ ~ E - 0 S -
u (2~~B~!.s~~.B~~~8~~vt)U~[E$]~iS~~c~a~~g]~€~,gs
~ ~C<lOJ<l::.oC<l:=.o~ ~.s~;:.,5's'~s "-'ooobsoo~,s~uBOJ)~o'-~.o8.Pi!~o
~ ~ t] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ] .B ~ ~ ] ] ~ I ~] ;;:; ~ ~'~ S.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~] ~ ~.i ~
~ ~ ~ OIl ~ ] ~,~ ~ ~ ,,g "2 "R ~ g 5 8 ~ t) ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ "2 ;g 00 ~ ] ~ 1 "2 OJ "2 8 c :~ s ~ ~ ~ ~
;;>;;>C<lOJ U .OJOJb'-:=OJ),_caOll_;::l ___ ....~-;::lC<l~"Ou....OJ;::l~...."oo> u; OJ"O
I I ~ -B ~ ~ ~ t ~ "2 a) ;:., -;"P o:! ~ OIl d e ~ = OJ ~ ~n"2 '';::: 6 ,S g ~ g,..c g ~ 'E 8 gp ~ ~ ,S ~
8 8 OJ ~ -;; ,9 ....... -B OJ ~ 8 g ~ t:: 5 -5 5 '5 ~ '5 5 U 8 i1J"l;:I ~ ~ ~ ~.s i1J........ ~ ~ o:! ~ 'C ., '~ OJ OJ
~~~'u;0,gp~.s'o>"08>!~SO~"O'~ClW~'~->8;::l~~~'t5>~~~~~~gp~gp~
~~~~._~ . o~o uu .~ _Ud~-'-O' -u~ vo d
c:::! c:::! .;::l . _ 0 ._ ~ .... ~ ..J:....._..... . .... -'" ~ ."0, $2 OJ -'" -'" .j:l ~ ,~ .0 .~ ~ '" . UO "''''''' ...c ,:;
oor--_O"""OJOIlooO~~N~~"O_MC<l~"O,,,,"<<lV)OO~....~~;::l;::l_C<lCl;::lI'"~ I'"~r--u_
~
;>,
'$
.'"
<..l
<<:
1i
'"
u
::lll::
u
00
~
o
"""
OJ
?Jl
~
r;-:>
;n~
N
---
00
~
r') :::E
0
0 <:
N 1.0
-- ;r:
on
N
-- r')
00
-
-
~co:::
;= ~ C
rIl\C'"
.... ;> ....
~ ~ ~
og~
.... M ~
.=: 9 J:
"t rT C)
-< 7: it:
~:;t:m
rIl ~ It')
~ CI} N
U ~ ~
~~I
-0
u
....
] <8 .~ . i ~ 00 ~ <I.l ] li "5 .- <I.l ~ I:: ~ .>S 0 v
~~~ ~~ '~"o .S<l.l<l.l~gj;su5. d'&~ ~.~~ .g~ ~N~~
OJ OJ I:: 0 .s - 6 ..c: ~ ;g e.n.D ~ -5 ~ !a ~ 'VS E .E P..:S .::::' <I.l OJ ~ !5 "0 ~ I:: co '7 00 'E
~~8 ~I:: ~~ OO'S ].>SS~~~I-~1::88[{l!5co~~8~~ -8e~~ B~~8
g o:l)( N ._ ~ .S cT <I.l "0 U _ o:l I::: .... <H . ~ I:: '-' 0 OJ <I.l ~ _ ~
.t:l ii:S o:l u' "0 ~ OJ;; ~ . ~ 0.. Oil <I.l O.S:! "0 ~ ;;> <I.l o:l V <I.l - .... 8 <H <I.l: '0
: g I:: gj 13 OJ 13 ,-;:: <I.l .s <I.l ~ [(l 6 ~ ~~""'.D U g.g c.; , ..c: '+:' 0 '""':0 8 6.... ~ g...... I::
0' ~ t3 ~ ..s ..c: !5 ~ 0.. ~ '';:; o:l 0.. "0 "'.- _"t) ~ ~ o:l ~;; <l:: g '" 'f.il ';; B
<H[{lr') ,:,t.-::l U .... <H..c:0 ro'" -SrJitIJ;>0J8"O<H~~O<li I:: ro
,:,t. .S:! 0 ~ .&l 6..9 ] B .::::' ~ f-< ~] ] ~ ] ] ..8 6 ~ ~ ~ ' .;;: ~ is.. I &::"5 ~ ~ .g @;; gj
~ ?;r; .D ~ "o'~ 0 <l:: ~ 0 . 0 <I.l <I.l U U ~ .~ ~ .....I r') e o:l .l!l ~ . E 0 o:l "::l > 5l
~ ~ ~ ~ "0 !a 00 00.. '""' ~ ',g ;>-. I:: ] !a "0 !a !a ~ ;> "0 ~ ~. ~ 0.. g.'c fr ~ <I.l E ;r; 6) "'" o:l :
~ OJ 00 I:: I:: ""~ 1il ~ _", - .... OJ 0 0 on 0 Ql _ _ - .... N - ::l ......
OJ ~.... '-' !a t<l -'-.::::' a ~ , ;> ~.- - I:: tl ~- ~ 0 - O;S N.... 0 - .:= <I.l -I:: -- <I.l A C"
~ ....I3<1i ~~ ~~~~<I.lg"t)8~~~~"O,:,t.0~~~~~0~~~NoOOs~~0il~e ~gj<~
I:: B8<1.l ~ U::l ~~ ii:S..c:....l::u _;>ro ....-'-'~ . o:l..........5. u=<I.l-
t<l'""'<H ~ 130 .D ~O ~1::....~t<lo:l"OW<l.l<l.l~ ~v~~=.~a"O,+:, .'-=~
~~~tl ~~'""'~]~~~~~'~~1~~~.~:]~tt8~?~!.5~~]! '!~~~
_ I:: <I.l 0 0 a r/) Oil 8 "0 .... V)..<:: , "0 0 <l:: ~ .,q .- .- !a 1::'- >>.... ~ '-' 1.0 .l!l "0 -5 ''!=i 'f.il 8 C" '" g
;"""t<lCla .....'" C~'I::ON""~~ <I.lOOlO"'....O"'.D.....,,,o.1::I.OI::U....1::1:: <o:l.....,
~~[{l<l.l"O ~~~~~8~5~~]~.~;S]~~6jCl~~]~BB~~13~~8 ~~s~
.~ ~'5.s!a <H ~ 8.S ~~~ 8"2.6_a ~6.~~--EcE5;:;..c:"'..c:-;;~ ~ ~ ~~ '~~13~
....'" ar~ '" "'''0' "0 <I.l__ "'..... 0 til I '" &l....13 1::1 <I.l u13........... 00- ~..... 0..001:: 8 Po ~:
j~i~1 G~~]J~]~j]~~l~-5~~jj~i'.~~~~~~~~~'""'~~~l~
~ c:! 0 ::l ~ .D V) I:: ::; '1<! <I.l .- ii:S t<l - ......... '" <I.l 0.. ~ ,:,t. ::; 0.. i!) <I.l .;; <I.l ,-;:: ::l B <I.l OJ ~
i~U~13 ..c:.sS.~~"t)~]~i~~~I~~.6]B~~~~t3'~e~..seo= ~~.~~
::; 00-..... r/) '-'13-"00 00'8 ~ 0 o:l cD 8 €::l U '" '" 00- <I.l B Po"O~ "0'.... ell OJ
f;tlf~.~~1~~1!~~]:i~~!.~!J]JJ~~jil~~if!~j~if
u u co <I.l 0 ~ ~ .D ~ . N!:E . g- gj . 0 0.. S "0 -s E &! ~ '€ 6) ~ - ~ .;:1..... 'O.,r ~ 13 .... I:: .,.; C"'C ~
.S 13 ~ ;s:a , 0\ ~ I:: S ~ ~ :: ;::., e s:! ~ ~ 8 !a 8 8 .~ < .~ Ul < ~ '0.. ~ g':o.. I:: - '" ..... c.S 8 - < co 1il
~ '-----> ~
~
i-
:~
1:>
0(
~
oS
U
:::.:::
u
00
~
o
V)
<I.l
?Jl
0..
(') ::E
0
0 <:
N \0
---- ;1:
lI)
N -
---- (')
00
-
-
"" C"-'. Cl.l rn ell ,A';:l cU
~~~S ~;j f.8rn] ~ rn "~ "2]i _~~
._ ~ (')"" ~ 0 ". -<'0 0.. .0 ,- rn "0 '" Cl.l ~ ::l ell "0 ____ u ......_ ""..... >. Cl.l
"lli ;;;> U <D g..o ~ ~ s:: g.~ ';(.~ ~ '3 -B ~ "2 s:: ~ "2 ~ 0 ell Cl.l ;:l'~ ~ Cl.l ~ ,- ~
'~ .:.. ~.~ "" .~ cS ~ 2,] t: ~ Q) 8...0 B ~ ~ cs ] 'g. ell 8. cs 00 ; ,5 ii ] "2..03 '5 ~ ~ ~ c
~..c:- ell"lli rn -~ f!l-0"2 Cl.lell o..OoS::oo..~~o..Cl.lCl.l"'" ~Eoo~
~ 8 tZl II .5,- SO ~ =1:t: ~ =. ,<:: ~ a rn ~ Ql.5 8 g. ~ .~ a 8 <;,J <+=< 13 ~ ii f!l ~ ~ ell 0.. 8 -B
..... I "" ~ "lli ~ Cl.l s:: ro ~ Cl.l b-< Cl.l 0 s.! o"lli 0.. ~ cup.,. 00 r.n' ;:l _ Cl.l _ s:: __
~ (') ~..... .- Cl.l >.s 'r::..o ~ . Cl.l ii g. It' ~.- Cl.l 0.. ~ ~ S rn 5 <"i -0 .-5 B ~ ~ ii ~!l ~ E
';>~_~ ~~S~ ~1~i~.aB,5! ii]~~~~] sj~~~~ ~:.2~i~
ON~~ ..c:Cl.l~;:l UCl.l~oro~Cl.lCl.l.>' ~ -""-0 ~0""'""S::Cl.l ii!;J>.~~
6;: e U ~ .::: 11 ~.~ 0 ~ 8 .g. ~ ~ ii ,f ] ~ .5 ~ ,~ g ~"g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,g ~ ~ e- ~ t: is
..,. . 1rt 0.. 0.......0 ;.= ell b S::'- 0 ro c l:l "" ro 6 rn :..:: ~ 'r:: ..0'-'-' u 0 0 "0 .
......, >. ~ 0 ell rn rn"O '..0-"" s:: .;3 '0 ;:g - I:: v s:: '=..0 ~ ,- :s 0 0.. .... Cl.l;:g ~ ;:l Cl.l 8 f <D . rn
- 1::: ..c:"'" ,..., - - <D &! '.0 rn 0.. ,- Cl.l ro ..c: ;:l 'Q) Cl.l .- ;0 0 ~ l:l'-'- "2 N !;J ~ >. Cl.l
U~ 8. tZl ~ '2 i3> 13 cs .~ o,~ = "" 2 ~ s:: ~ ~ ..0 rn 8 l:l 2 ~ a ~..c: 2 2 ~ 's .:::'. ell !;J ~ B
o "u.:::' 'l;l ..0 0.. - 0.. ;.< Cl.l s:: Cl.l Cl.l "2"0 ~ ,<:: 0.."" E-< "" Cl.l .- ::> ..c: 0.. [)
-~~!::>~~ell8.:::'0..8Cl.l~.s]~.~~~~rn<D~b-<~sro .~ ~&!ii.5~.....~rn>~
] ~.f 1 ~ ~ 8 .,5 ~ ~ ..@' e- -5 P.. ~ O's 2 ~ Cl.l 8. 8. 8 =. c..., E:a ~ '5 c..., 0 t:: 8 , ] g ~:.E ~
tZl8~Cl.l,Cl.l~.~;:l;;;>~,<::c...,""iio..-~!;Jii 008~08l:l .....s::00..8.0'Q)0~Cl.lCl.l"'"
. :.s ~ "" 'Q) -B ~ ~ ~ I l:l t"' ~ 3 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' a a ~ ,~ ~ 8 "" ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ii ""
lS:: 5l 6 In 8 B rn &! > 'Q) E . jg ~ 0 Cl.l ~, "2 ~ 'Q) ~ rn" ~ g. ~ 8 3 ~ ~ ~ Cl.l iil.~ I '': "2 ..c: .5 ~
.:::' ;>. ~ ~] , ~ ,5 Cl.l ell 8 c;J ii - = <l:i t: ~ ~ rn ~ 8.::: 8 ;E: F 5 1il Cl.l ~ 0.. 5 ii ~ "gh 8 .;:; ~ ~ ii 0..
::> /a.::: = 0 ~ li 2 ii .,5 ~ 5 [(J ~ ro "8 . 0 rn 8. ro;' 0'1ij ~:.. ~ .;; .E 0 B ~ ~ s:: ';:: V=i;,:: 6 l3 'i ~
~'850~~~~~s'~e<+=<lii8~i'~~8]e~~~'~'~~~ ii'~::!l~'s~~a~Cl.lCl.l
, ,_ s:: ~ a -- ~ . ~ Cl.l lI) ~ rn V .8 ro. ::;2' <+=< 0.. U lI)..o 5il rn 5 Cl.l ro <+=< Cl.l ;:l 8 c..., e::> ell ~ f f!l
..... Q) ,0 ..c: Cl.l e'+=I ~ rn ~ '+=I ~.2:..... ;:l ~ U ..... rn"" ~ Cl.l lP '-1' ..c: en s:: "lli lI) ii ..0 \+-. 0 ... s::"" !;J-<'O
Cl.l .r< .0 ~ ro =:- en rn 00 ro Cl.l rn "O"..c: ro ro iil s:: 00 -<'0 s:: Cl.l ..... U s:: Cl.l 'i::j s:: Cl.l - 'li) >. '<=l
8 ~ ,g. ~ ii ~ Iii ~ .S- ~ --: Iii .> E 2 Cl.l .5 ~ ~ ~ ~ --: '<=l 8 l:l 8 't; .;;; ~ g.] 8 ~ .;3 .~.~ E .D =s ~-B
~~&l,~IJS::.~"g.~s::~.5~~~rn~>gi!>.-BB"2'58~~ell"2~~'~~~'~!ii'~
o s:: ~ > U Cl.l ~ .8 Cl.l ~ ~ ro rn - ..:<: 0"2.- ~'+=I rn ;:l ~ ~ - rn t't '+=1 ~ ~ s:: rn ~ 0 \lJ 8 ell <b Cl.l Cl.l
V=i 0 _ ~ ~ > E-< Cl.l ~ &! C E-< s:: [(J:sg ~ t; U 2 '';:; u s;( Cl Cl.l '+=I..c: 0 ie;.;:::; , E-< :.s 0 ~ ~ a'~ .~ - ~ 2
~ ro -lP .._ro- c...,-i..o~;:l r.n;:l_ >._uo..~w..... _o..Cl.l..o ~ .ellr.n_
"-: . ell ..- . ~ - Cl.l U . 0 Cl.l ..... ~"O Cl.l .- "d 0 ':.E:-;:l 0 ro s:: Cl.l . ,- 0 "'" .... Cl.l"" ..... - -
00\0 ~0Cl.l00~s::-0~ .... Cl.lS::<D..c:;'<<D~O +=I8~..c:88-;:l~~~-<'O..,.N~.=;:lCl.l
'-' - ~ - ...... J:;J - 0::::: -_ ~ ""'0 - - ~ 0.. tI) 0 ~ ~ (l) ~ 0.. N ::3 0.. U N ..0 0.. Q) tI) ~ ~ N 0.. 00 0..0
~
i-
.s:
.""
u
<
1;\
'"
u
eJ) Q
= 0::
.- ~ c
- Q
rI:J.\Co::
.- c:r
~ ~ ~ 00
~Q<( c...,
- Q 3: 0
.- M \0
~9~ Cl.l
.- ::I: f
t;; ~ S! i:l.
-< .. 0::
QJ=lt:aJ
rI:J. Q,l It)
~ l"-l N
U ~ ..-
~~I
-0
u
....
::.:::
u
M :::E
g <:
N \0
;;:; ;l:
N _
00 ("')
-
-
~QD::
;: a c
CIJ\C)"'"
.... ~ .....
~ ~ ~
~ sz ic(~
.. -
.... M
;5 9 J:
~~~
< .. D::
QJ:t:t:al
CIJ ~ It)
~ rIJ N
U ~ or-
~~I
-0
<.>
....
>. 00 ~ ~ ~.~.~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~
.DgfOOI -;~!5 ~"QO""@~ ~
~:..= 6 8 r:: v.i d I ~ tf) E e
~~o~ ~ ~ 0.....8.~0000~ ~
~ .g ~ '3 ::I 'C3 5 '~~ 0 ~;; 6 5 ~ cO
0.."'8 ::I 00 :if 1a '6 ~'a - .~ ..s ~ ~ 8
2~g]~ ~0..6 V86(;l~~!il 9 6
~ 0.. V ~~ ~;;:;~"'8~vv..... ~
oo~_~ ~~z 8~"'8~v>~0.. ~ 00
~~~o 0000 -oo~D. ::10.. '~[,5
o ::;. - t'+:: v - ~.,.... .- I:: .-r o:s ~
v~oo.D ~~s ~~o]O~~ ] ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. t+: 0 C<l. ~ .- '" 0, v o:s,"'8
~ '+" ~ C<l 00 .+:: ~ [.D u- o...~ ~ ~''=''> ~ ~o {i
~'C3v!!? o:soo~ v !rlv~.8 OJ <Jl
00 > ~ v ,::; ~ ;S ~ .15 .-;:: ~ - 0.. >'+:: g
00 a'l: ~ "2 v.s v ] 8 00 ~ (;l ~ 'I::;a-
~ '0; "t:l v - ~ ~ I ~ CI) 9 00 00"'8 :8 0.. ~ ...
~~].~ '~'~~~~5~~j(;l~ ~~.[[
;>v~~ o~v~::: ......\OuO .+=
~ ..... ,- 00 ..... t:\.; ~ I' ~.s o:s - ;a v ~] v
'0; ,::: 00 v. .- .... .s 0 0 v - ~ ~ '+:: >
"'8v~~ .:::~~o>.~~!il(;l'-o~::I~2'
~ ;S ,5 5 (;l ~ a;;:; ~ ~ v ~ .....'~ . ~ ~ I o:s ~
~cU..soo ~<nI':~I-<C:~::Id:l~~~ ~~o
v :c .~ ~ ~ .... ,~e iil ~ ::I ~ '0' ~ J! I ] S ';; ~
~._::;.v vVOO 'v,5~~~'~v""'::I.....v~
b~~i ;s~~~;S~~8~.~~~08~B
~ o..ss ~.g >.] ~ @ d:l:E;S >.5-' ~ I [(i 8
~.~ooo ';;v.D!il';;v{i~~~oo("')~....~oo
V$~~~~v~{io..V~V~>.~NQ~Q~C<l
~[(i~~ ~~o:s~~::I~v..se~<n~<n<~
~ o~ ,uvV'o . > v"'" ~.~.s
.~ i;::.. 11 , ~ ,5 ~ ~ ~ ,5 ~ 8.. <E ~ S e ~ e ~ I
---:>
.
~
>.
:~
u
-<
~
'"
u
00
'+-<
o
~
V
~
t:\.;
N
~
li
~
....
~
-
.
~
=-=<.>
h :::E
8 ~
~ 1.0
Ifl ;r:
N ......
00 ("')
......
......
~=o:::
.,. ~ c
...... =
rI.ll,C.v
.,. ~ ....
~ ~ ~
~=C:(
:.:: ~ 3:
~QI-
~ ~ :I:
~~C>
-< .. ~
~=I:I:m
rI.l Qj It)
~ rI} N
U ~ ~
.c
s::'~ .5
05b 1l
]t'J ~
t'J '"
.D ~ "0
~...c: ~
o '" ii:l .
~ -: ~ '" ~ =",
"OC3la.D]~~
s:: . ~ t'J f'-o
:=3 gf ;:- '" .;: '0
~'.g a) ?>.~ i)!
00'-';:0 r:a ..... 0
s::t;::; E='o..
~ 6 'O'j; 0 ~
'3 U a 0..1l=
~ .D ;... '" ~ v .S
(ii'O....;~1l~~
~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~
~"'a)0'Oa)
o ::: f}i -f]i.5 ii:l "0
~~]......~6;
;;> ::: t<:l ....;...., ::: E
~o=.....:l'" "'0:1
Z-f]i-:~6]0..
'~C3a)~""'~
~1a=~1a]=,
N 5: ~:= 5: 0..0'
~:=;'f}i~N.s~
.
=' f2 .
a) t'J 6
6 -5 5b'-
O~!:3(;j
~~"5]
].D]"@
::: ~ t'J a)
gf ~ ~ .5
~a)a)1l
'5 ii:l S ~
.Da)~i3
~ a1 ..... U
.,...c:<B
~'O<;;;~..5
a)~..Qa
(ii :g 0.. <<l a1
~ '" ~'O...c:
~~.:::"3"O
O@~~6
ua)~(;j5
5';:5';:<;
o 613..!!l0..
I t'J t: g ~
M a) a) o..~.
oii:l~a)O'
~ll~gft'J
Mf'-o.:a=,.;:
- = ~.-
oo....;~___~
t'J .....
~<8
g '"
.D 8
;>,.'"
t<:l .-
~~
~...c:
t'J a)
...c: 5
S @
.8..<::
~ .1::::
0Il~
.5 1l
~~
OIl'"
5 .5
. a)
;:g.D
'S '0
.D~
='
a) 0
.;: U
..... a)
o.gp
~ a)
'O...c: .
'VJ ~ 6
a) 8-0
.;: t'J U
E=g'O
o'O~
. 0 '0
N~o:l
'0 E v
"E<<l'E
a) 0..;:
.E '<t t'J
~~]
~';..s .
0:l"3a) ~
~~';:~6
-5 ",g.8 0..
.- - ~
gf..s gf Q::: <B
~ ".- 0 ~
:;::] ~ ~.-
=' =' ~ U ~
.D .D'- 15..
a)JSOIl:::'"
.;: "'t'J.....
.. , '0.", a) :::
~~'O>t<:l
~ 6 '3 'So 0-
a1U.D'O"E
e~a)"3t'J
o:::.;:~]
u ._ t.j.... ;> 0
t=1l 0 \!l:::
aJ~~~-
..s.~ g <; fJl
=' ";;;.D 0.. '0
~t'Jll~~
1l~<;;;a)5
..... ::: '" ~. S
~ ''€J 8 0' 0
....t'JUa)1d
MO-gF:~
:s~
~ ~~
a) F: '.
.;; . 6
::: 1l .-
o ::: (;j
''!a'~ ~
.e!l 'E t+:<
~ a) :::
:::.D 8
]SOIJ
..... ~.,8
5 ~.\!l
,g g ~
'" '0 .....
t= 00' Q)
a:l .,8 .;:
g .\!l .5
8 ~ t=
.....0 a) a:l
.;: U
~(;j8
:0';:6
8 ~ ''!a
0.. <<::i OIl '"
o a) .;;: '8
:::.;: t'J 0
a) 0 ::: ~
~ ..... t'J
..c~o~
......,o:::co
~
;>,
.~
',c
<.>
-<
1;l
'"
u
M ("')
8 ~ 8 ~
S ~ S ~
--- ---
00 00
~
~
~
z
o
o
00
.....
o
00
a)
~
~
~
~
~
z
o
o
~
o
Z
M
o
o
N
---
......
---
00
a)
=
o
Z
("')
o
o
N
---
o
("')
---
r--
("') ("')
0 0
0 0
N N
--- --
00 00
...... ......
-- ---
1.0 1.0
~ ~
a) a)
.;:: .....
>
::.::: ~ ~
'-' <; ....
~~I a)
"E .....
'"
~ t'J
:::E
....
,g 0
i; -e
t'J
~ ~
N 0
-0 '<t 0\
'-' 0 0
I- 0 0
0 0
.....:l .....:i
~ ~
,.,"I~#~
J'.I,l,~~~ ..........
t~, .~J
~~ 'l ..
II . .:_.:l.",~:.", , _
~-, :","~,"," ,,"'!!( ..
:~~ .... .., S>:
~~- :9:;.
~~If.dl,-;_.',., '~,~\
......:.i'.TE1\'1.,'
Fire Conditioff'"
· Conditions Associated Wit'
FLD2003-06030
125 BRIGHTWATER DR
Duanne Anderson
562-3039
07/30/2003 Code summary needs to reflect adherence with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2001 Edition
(before building permit).
07/30/2003 All fire alarm work to be done as per NFPA-72 by licensed fire alarm contractor with separate
permit and shop drawings (before building permit).
07/30/2003jAII fire sprinkler work to be done as per NFPA-13 for Ordinary Hazard Group 1 in garage and
NFPA-13R for the residential living area, by licensed fire sprinkler contractor with separate permit
and shop drawings (before building permit).
07/30/2003 PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON SHEET C6.1
(before CDB).
07/31/2003 PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL FLOW AND TAMPER SWITCHES
ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (before building permit).
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
Parks & Recs Condition
Recreation Facility impact fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or
final plat, whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 10
existing hotel/motel guestrooms and 6 proposed residential units, $700 due.
Storm watejondition Elliot Shoberg 562-4748
Provide additional lot grading details showing swales and inverts conveying runoff to pond at rear
of site. (before building permit)
Print Date: 08/25/2003
1 of 1
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
~
1 :30 p.m.
,
.
.
FINAL AUGUST 14.2003. DRC COMMENTS FOR FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004
125 BRIGHTW ATER DRIVE
Case: FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004 - 125 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas I
Owners: Robert W. and Donna L. DeStefano.
Applicant: Anthony Menna.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ email: nestech0>mindspring.com).
Location: 0.32 acres on the south side of Bright water Drive, approximately 500 feet east of Harnden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east and
west) setbacks from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions
of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.3 feet (to pools) and from
20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to
permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and
existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 -phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson, Wayne Wells and Dianne Hufford
Applicant/Representative: Reggie Termulo, Housh Ghovaee and Debra Harris
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Recreation Facility impact fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or
final plat, whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 10
existing hotel/motel guestrooms and 6 proposed residential units, $700 due.
2. Stormwater:
a) Show inverts of pond and side slopes on plan view. (before CDB)
b) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5. (before building permit)
c) Provide additional lot grading details showing swales and inverts conveying runoff to pond at
rear of site. (before CDB)
d) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds. (before CDB)
3. Traffic Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Dimensions for all driveways must be shown i.e. width and length on sheet LA-I.
b) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at all driveways on Sheet LA-I. No structures or
landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty inches (30")
above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's Community
Development Code, Section 3-904).
c) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
d) TIF to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
4. General Enl!:ineerin2::
a) Standard sanitary sewer "wye" is 6" not 4" as shown on sheet C5.I.
b) Clean out for sanitary sewer "wye's" need to be physically located at the property line.
c) Need to install a fire hydrant assembly for fire protection or show a second fire hydrant (existing
or proposed) within 500 feet.
d) Need a detail ofa doghouse manhole shown on the detail sheet.
e) Proposed fire line main from the tap and one joint service side of the D.C.V.A. must be ductile
iron pipe.
Page Jof 4
'"1
.
.
1) Section A-A on Sheet C4.l is not in agreement with detail on Sheet C6.l.
g) Revise the proposed sidewalk within the Brightwater Drive right-of-way on all appropriate sheets
to show a four-foot wide sidewalk (not five feet wide).
h) Revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
PL T2003-00004
i) Need cover sheet for plat (Dedication, Legal Description, Surveyors Certification, etc.).
j) Suggest squaring offlot lines at rear oflots.
k) Show all lot line dimensions, bearings, etc.
1) Revise i-k prior to Final Plat submittal.
5. Planninl!:
a) The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation 7.9.
With existing elevations at 4.9 on the east side and 5.0 on the west side, and proposed elevation
changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the building, this means on the
east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential. Are the edges of the driveways on
the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross sections at these locations.
b) Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is 2.4 feet
between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.2 feet grade differential on the
west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally constructed.
c) General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. Ifnot
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
d) Denote on Sheet C2.l the type(s) of trees on-site and on adjacent property.
e) Since this development is being subdivided/resubdivided, Section 3-l908.A states that "The city
may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way be relocated
and/or placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is redeveloped." Also
noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such under grounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground. Address on Sheets C2.l and C5.1.
1) Waterfront visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The triangle is a
45-degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on the water and along
the side property line. Revise.
g) Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in elevation from livable area
to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations, including waterfront
visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
h) Building Code requires an l8-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
i) Revise Sheet C1.l for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is proposed and
discussed in the narrative.
j) Dimension building on Sheet C3.l and on Sheets E-l and E-2. Unclear where rear wall of
building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
k) Show on Sheets E-l and E-2 the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof, not top of
truss) from the required FFE (base flood elevation).
1) Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheets E-l and E-2 is
necessary. There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be muted by
any landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on the front and rear
elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as part of the cornice, molding
underneath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions of wall, quoins and like
architectural elements. Architectural elements on side elevations should be consistent with and
complement front and rear elevations. Concern: Elevations provided by Donoghue Wood &
Associates Inc. Architects look extremely similar to those provided for project at 116 Brightwater
Drive by Douglas W. Lowe, P.E. Building plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
m) Revise Sheet CLl under "usage" to provide the correct square footage of each unit (not 1,020
square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 18.66 dwelling units per acre.
Page 2014
~
.
.
n) Provide the proposed color of railings. Provide color samples of building and architectural
elements. Colored rendering of building submitted doesn't match front elevation for ground floor
(make consistent).
0) Make name of project consistent (elevations refer to Bell(a) Aqua Villas versus Bell(e) Aqua
Villas). Also, since 116-120 Brightwater is referred to as "Belle Aqua Villas II," suggest
amending name to "Belle Aqua Villas I" so as to not confuse.
p) On the Preliminary Plat Sheet C 1.1 A, provide the existing legal description of the subject
property.
q) Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet C1.1 and Sheet C3.l to indicate the proposed side setback
to pavement (believed to be five feet).
r) The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing dock and three boat slips. Site inspection
reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these existing boats be removed? By when?
Please address existing versus proposed circumstances with the dock/slips.
s) The narrative for General Applicability Criteria #1 (on page 1 of narrative) states that "The
proposed side setback reductions are less intrusive than that of the existing motel use." This is
partially true, from a "ground plane" standpoint. These existing setbacks are qualified from the
standpoint that the motel is one-story in height. The proposed building (at the proposed reduced
setback) is overwhelming due to the proposed bulk of the building at four stories. Revise
narrative to speak to the existing versus proposed character when relating to setback reductions
and character of the site generally (existing versus proposed).
t) Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway configurations, proposed
setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for meaningful landscaping, much less
making it "tropical." There is no landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building due to
proposed site characteristics. Revise comments and/or address proposed conditions in narrative
under all appropriate criteria.
u) Proposed development appears to be extensive and excessive for this size of property.
v) The request is to reduce the side setbacks to 3.8 feet to building and 5 feet to pavement. There is
no landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building to mitigate the effects of the bulk of
the proposed building due to the reduced setback. Staff may not support the reductions requested
without the provision of mitigation to minimize or reduce the bulk issue. Advise/revise.
w) Comment: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided through garage
parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even temporarily) outside the garage
within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with these proposed townhomes. Different
than single-faririly detached dwellings where on-street parking by guests is possible, the site
design of these attached dwellings (townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street
parking by guests unless driveways are blocked.
x) Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet. Provide
justification as part of narrative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-to-four stories
over parking).
y) Revise the survey to include the base flood elevation. Also include such information on Sheet
C1.1.
z) Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This site is
indicated at 1,207 square feet, yet the project at 116 Brightwater Drive (which is extremely
similar) is indicated at 1,439 square feet, or smaller by 232 square feet. One or both projects
appear wrong. Revise.
aa) Underground all utilities (private and right-of-way).
bb) Address/revise above prior to scheduling for CDB.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments.
7. Land Resources:
a) No comments.
Page 3014
t
.
.
.
8. Fire:
a) All fIre sprinkler work to be done as per NFPA-13 for Ordinary Hazard Group I in garage and
NFPA-13R for the residential living area, by licensed fIre sprinkler contractor with separate
permit and shop drawings (before building permit).
b) PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL FLOW AND TAMPER
SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (before
building permit).
c) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON SHEET
C6.l (before CDB).
d) All fIre alarm work to be done as per NFP A-72 by licensed fIre alarm contractor with separate
permit and shop drawings (before building permit).
e) Code summary needs to reflect adherence with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2001 Edition
(before building permit).
f) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt tolerant plant species for ponds.
10. Communitv Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapinl!:
a) The area on the south side of the building needs some landscape treatments. It appears there are
areas between the units / plunge pools that would allow for some Fakahatchee grass with a Queen
palm or other palm centered in each location.
b) On the sides of the building starting about halfway back a Podocarpus hedge could be installed
with some hibiscus for added color.
c) At the southern comers of the building the same treatment of plantings as listed in # 1 could be
used, this would total 4 palms across the back of the building breaking up the facade a little. The
Queen palms would give a nice soft look.
d) Revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
12. Harbor Master
a) There are no problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing
docks will be retained. There are no navigation concerns in their existing confIguration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than 4:00 pm.
Page 4014
1 :30 p.m.
.
.
DRAFT Comments for AUl!ust 14. 2003 DRC
Case: FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004 - 125 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas I
Owners: Robert W. and Donna L. DeStefano.
Applicant: Anthony Menna.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ email: nestech(@,mindspring.com).
Location: 0.32 acres on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 500 feet east of Harnden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east and
west) setbacks from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions
of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.3 feet (to pools) and from
20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to
permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and
existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson, Tom Glenn, Wayne Wells, and
Lisa Fierce
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Recreation Facility impact fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or
final plat, whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 10
existing hotel/motel guestrooms and 6 proposed residential units, $700 due.
2. Stormwater:
a) Show inverts of pond and side slopes on plan view. (before CDB)
b) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5. (before building permit)
c) Provide additional lot grading details showing swales and inverts conveying runoff to pond at
rear of site. (before CDB)
d) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds. (before CDB)
3. Traffic Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Dimensions for all driveways must be shown i.e. width and length on sheet LA-I.
b) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at all driveways on Sheet LA-I. No structures or
landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty inches (30")
above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's Community
Development Code, Section 3-904).
c) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
d) TIF to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
4. General Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Standard sanitary sewer "wye" is 6" not 4" as shown on sheet C5.I.
b) Clean out for sanitary sewer "wye's" need to be physically located at the property line.
c) Need to install a fire hydrant assembly for fire protection or show a second fire hydrant (existing
or proposed) within 500 feet.
d) Need a detail ofa doghouse manhole shown on the detail sheet.
e) Proposed fire line main from the tap and one joint service side of the D.C.V.A. must be ductile
iron pipe.
t) Section A-A on Sheet C4.1 is not in agreement with detail on Sheet C6.1.
Page 1 of 4
.
.
g) Revise the proposed sidewalk within the Brightwater Drive right-of-way on all appropriate sheets
to show a four-foot wide sidewalk (not five feet wide).
h) Revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
PL T2003-00004
i) Need cover sheet for plat (Dedication, Legal Description, Surveyors Certification, etc.).
j) Suggest to square off lot lines at rear of lots.
k) Show all lot line dimensions, bearings, etc.
1) Revise i-k prior to Final Plat submittal.
5. Plannin!!::
a) The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation 7.9.
With existing elevations at 4.9 on the east side and 5.0 on the west side, and proposed elevation
changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the building, this means on the
east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential. Are the edges of the driveways on
the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross sections at these locations.
b) Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is 2.4 feet
between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.2 feet grade differential on the
west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally constructed.
c) General comment regarding Sheet C6.l - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. Ifnot
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
d) Denote on Sheet C2.1 the type(s) of trees on-site and on adjacent property.
e) Since this development is being subdivided/resubdivided, Section 3-1908.A states that "The city
may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way be relocated
and/or placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is redeveloped." Also
noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such under grounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground. Address on Sheets C2.1 and C5.1.
f) Waterfront visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The triangle is a
45-degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on the water and along
the side property line. Revise.
g) Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in elevation from livable area
to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations, including waterfront
visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
h) Building Code requires an 18-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
i) Revise Sheet C1.1 for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is proposed and
discussed in the narrative.
j) Dimension building on Sheet C3.1 and on Sheets E-1 and E-2. Unclear where rear wall of
building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
k) Show on Sheets E-1 and E-2 the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof, not top of
truss) from the required FFE (base flood elevation).
1) Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheets E-1 and E-2 is
necessary. There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be muted by
any landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on the front and rear
elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as part of the cornice, molding
underneath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions of wall, quoins and like
architectural elements. Architectural elements on side elevations should be consistent with and
complement front and rear elevations. Concern: Elevations provided by Donoghue Wood &
Associates Inc. Architects look extremely similar to those provided for project at 116 Brightwater
Drive by Douglas W. Lowe, P.E. Building plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
m) Revise Sheet C1.1 under "usage" to provide the correct square footage of each unit (not 1,020
square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 18.66 dwelling units per acre.
Page 2 of4
.
.
.
n) Provide the proposed color of railings. Provide color samples of building and architectural
elements. Colored rendering of building submitted doesn't match front elevation for ground floor
(make consistent).
0) Make name of project consistent (elevations refer to Bella Aqua Villas versus Belle Aqua Villas).
Also, since 116-120 Brightwater is referred to as "Belle Aqua Villas II," suggest amending name
to "Belle Aqua Villas I" so as to not confuse.
p) On the Preliminary Plat Sheet CLlA, provide the existing legal description of the subject
property.
q) Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet CLl and Sheet C3.1 to indicate the proposed side setback
to pavement (believed to be five feet).
r) The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing dock and three boat slips. Site inspection
reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these existing boats be removed? By when?
Please address existing versus proposed circumstances with the dock/slips.
s) The narrative for General Applicability Criteria # I (on page 1 of narrative) states that "The
proposed side setback reductions are less intrusive than that of the existing motel use." This is
partially true, from a "ground plane" standpoint. These existing setbacks are qualified from the
standpoint that the motel is one-story in height. The proposed building (at the proposed reduced
setback) is overwhelming due to the proposed bulk of the building at four stories. Revise
narrative to speak to the existing versus proposed character when relating to setback reductions
and character of the site generally (existing versus proposed).
t) Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway configurations, proposed
setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for meaningful landscaping, much less
making it "tropica1." There is no landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building due to
proposed site characteristics. Revise comments and/or address proposed conditions in narrative
under all appropriate criteria.
u) The request is to reduce the side setbacks to 3.8 feet to building and 5 feet to pavement. There is
no landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building to mitigate the effects of the bulk of
the proposed building due to the reduced setback. Staff may not support the reductions requested
without the provision of mitigation to minimize or reduce the bulk issue. Advise/revise.
v) Comment: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided through garage
parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even temporarily) outside the garage
within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with these proposed townhomes. Different
than single-family detached dwellings where on-street parking by guests is possible, the site
design of these attached dwellings (townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street
parking by guests unless driveways are blocked.
w) Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet. Provide
justification as part of narrative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-to-four stories
over parking).
x) Revise the survey to include the base flood elevation. Also include such information on Sheet
CLl.
y) Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This site is
indicated at 1,207 square feet, yet the project at 116 Brightwater Drive (which is extremely
similar) is indicated at 1,439 square feet, or smaller by 232 square feet. One or both projects
appear wrong. Revise.
z) Underground all utilities (private and right-of-way).
aa) Address/revise above prior to scheduling for CDB.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments.
7. Land Resources:
a) No comments.
8. Fire:
a) All fire sprinkler work to be done as per NFPA-13 for Ordinary Hazard Group 1 in garage and
NFPA-13R for the residential living area, by licensed fire sprinkler contractor with separate
permit and shop drawings (before building permit).
Page 3 of4
..
.
.
b) PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL FLOW AND TAMPER
SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (before
building permit).
c) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON SHEET
C6.l (before CDB).
d) All fIre alarm work to be done as per NFPA-72 by licensed fIre alarm contractor with separate
permit and shop drawings (before building permit).
e) Code summary needs to reflect adherence with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2001 Edition
(before building permit).
f) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt tolerant plant species for ponds.
10. Community Resoonse:
a) No comments.
11. Landscaoine::
a) The area on the south side of the building needs some landscape treatments. It appears there are
areas between the units / plunge pools that would allow for some Fakahatchee grass with a Queen
palm or other palm centered in each location.
b) On the sides of the building starting about halfway back a Podocarpus hedge could be installed
with some hibiscus for added color.
c) At the southern corners of the building the same treatment of plantings as listed in # 1 could be
used, this would total 4 palms accross the back of the building breaking up the facade a little. The
Queen palms would give a nice soft look.
d) Revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
12. Harbor Master
a) I have no problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing
docks will be retained. They are not a navigation concern in their existing confIguration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon.
Page 4 of 4
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rice, Scott
Monday, August 04, 2003 1 :57 PM
Wells, Wayne
Brightwater Sidewalks
Wayne
Section 3.1907 of the Redevelopment Code requires a 4-foot sidewalk for local roads. Therefore, we should be requiring a
4-foot sidewalk for the developments on Brightwater Drive.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Scott Rice
Land Deve/. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
srice@clearwater-f1.com
1
.
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rice, Scott
Tuesday, August OS, 2003 8:51 AM
Wells, Wayne
FLD2003-06030
Wayne
Don's comments on PL T2003-00004 have been added to the general engineering comments on FLD2003-06030 in the
activity section.
Scott Rice
Land Deve/. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
srice@c/earwater-fl.com
1
.
.
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
FLO".<oo'S- 0(,036
Case No. PLyc;JOOS - (){)().y' Meeting Date: August 14, 2003
Location: /....<,) Zro/,.-;;L- u/r<7r~ 2)r
,/ ~..
~(/ 'c a // C O{~~ ~2, '0 r+-
o Current Use:
o Active Code Enforcement Case ~)Yes:
o Address number~no) (vacant land)
o Landscaping~(no)
o Overgrown (yes) @
o Debris (yes) ~
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes~~l)
o Building(s) ~fair) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing (none~O'(dilaPidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
o Pain~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes) ~<1>
o Residential Parking Violations (yes)~
o Signage (none) ~ (not ok) (billboard)
o Parking (n/a)~andiCapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpster (enclosed) (~
o Outdoor storage (yes) @
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
. lS[elephone: ~ <~~,:)- V? 0)
Pin~llas County Property APp.r Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
Page 2 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0070
Z3-Jun-Z003 Jil'l Sl'lith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:3Z:43
Non-Residential. Property Add ress. Use. and Sal.es
COl'lparable sales value as Prop Addr: lZ5 BRIGHHJATER DR
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : Z60.0Z
sales frol'l 2000 - 2001 :
0 Sale Date DR Book/Page Price ClJual/UnlJ) Vac/Il'lp
Plat Inforl'lation 6 /1. 999 10.558/Z.304 140.000 CM) I
1951 : Book OZ1 Pgs 03Z-033 9 11.99Z 8.031/ 486 515.000 CM) I
0000 : Book pge - 11/1.990 1.4Z1/1.Z84 515.000 CU) I
0000 : Book pge - 11/1.983 5.636/1.901 350.000 CM) I
2002 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market: 300.000 HOl'lestead: Z5.000 Ownership 1 1.000
Historic : 0 Use 1: . no
Assessed/Cap: 300.000 Tax Exel'lpt 1: .000
Other EXBl'lp t : 0
Taxable: Z15.000 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0
2002 Tax Inforl'lation Land Inforl'lation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Cl.earwater View:
02 Millage: Z3. nl1 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Unite Meth
02 Taxes: 6.405.05
1) 58 x lZO 65.00 6.993.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Dur-Hol'les 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
6.405.05 6) 0 x 0 .00 . 00
Without any exel'lptions, Total Land Value: 454.545
2002 taxes will be :
6.981.33
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. Z LOT 1
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbintcgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 6/23/2003
Pin~llas County Property APp.r Information: 08291504932000 O.
Page 3 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0070 :01
Z3-Jun-Z003 Ji~ s~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:3Z:4Z
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Mote~/Hote~ < 4 St
Property Address: lZ5 BRIGHTWATER DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Spread/Mono Footing
S~ab on Grade
Cone B~oek/Stueeo
o
None
None
Gab~e &: Hip
Co~position Shing~e
Average
Carpet Co~bination
P ~aste r Fu rred
o
Heating & Air Heating&:Coo~ing Pekg
Fixtures 11
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
Wa~~ On~~
Ave rage
Reetang~e
Ave rage
L 953
Z5
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 Z.455 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch . ZO 5Z4 B) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 1 ZOOSF 1. 00 L ZOO 0 L ZOO 999
2) DOCK Z80SF 15.00 Z80 0 L 680 L 915
3) POOL 15X30 Z5. 000.00 1 0 11.150 L99Z
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VA LU E: ZO.630
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~g]
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p= ... 6/2312003
1-'--
.
.
,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September
16, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests:
NOTE: All persons wishin2 to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetin2. Those cases that
are not contested bv the applicant. staff. nei2hborin2 property owners. etc. will be placed on a consent a2enda and
approved bv a sin21e vote at the be2innin2 of the meetin2.
1. Richard Cope / CMT Holdin2. Ltd. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a non-residential parking lot
within the HDR District with a reduction in the front (east) setback along S. Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to 15 feet (to
pavement) and to reduce the front (south) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to existing pavement)
and reduce the front (west) setback along Aurora Avenue from 25 feet to 3 feet (to existing pavement) (Proposed Use: A non-
residential parking lot in association with an existing office development) and the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet
(to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.1 and the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to pavement),
under the provisions of Section 2-703.1 at 1988 Gulf-to-Bav Blvd., Sec. 13-29-15, M&B 24.07 and part of Sky Crest Unit 7
Elk C, Lot 5. FLD2003-06031
2. Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. are requesting an Amendment to previous approvals for signage: 1) Cases FLD 02-02-
06A1SGN2003-02009 - Conditions 1 and 2 which requires that the final design, height, area, color, etc. of signs be consistent
with the drawings submitted to, or as modified by the CDB, and that the signs for future tenants of the retail center have the
same background and text colors as approved by the CDB, as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program, under the provisions of
Section 3-1807; and 2) Case FLD2003-05023 - Condition 2 requiring that all signage comply with the approved
Comprehensive Sign Program application FLD 02-02-06A1SGN2003-02009.. (Proposed Use: An amendment to a
Comprehensive Sign Program for Amscot Financial, Inc. [922 South Missouri AvenueD at 922 South Missouri Ave., Sec. 22-
29-15, M&B 21.01. SGN2003-0800l
3. Robert W. and Donna L. DeStefano (Anthony Menna) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached
dwellings with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 15.6 feet (to pools) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit
parking that is designed to back into the public right~of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and
Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. (Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings [townhomesD at 125 Bri2htwater Dr., Bayside
Sub No.2, Lots 7 & 8. FLD2003-06030/PL T2003-00004
4. Garv and Marv A. Jerniean (Anthony Menna) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings
with reductions of the side (east) setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20
feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat
approval for six lots. (Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings [townhomesD at 116-120 Bri2htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 53 & 54 FLD2003-07032/PL T2003-00006
5. Larrv L. and Barbara S. Miller / Bri2htwater Pointe. LLC (Roland Rogers) are requesting a flexible development
approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement),
reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to
five feet (to pavement) and reductions .of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero
feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), with increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six
feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof deck for open gazebos) and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole use by the property owners) and the
Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403
.
.
i (Proposed Use: Twenty (20) attached dwellings [condominiums]) at 205, 209 & 214 Brie:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 27, 28 & 29. FLD2003-06027fI'DR2003-06003
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning
Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to
any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the
Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify,
present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests.
An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be
recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to
three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of
time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by
interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100
S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss
any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REOUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REOUEST AT (727) 562-4093.
Ad: 08/31/03
...
PinsJlas County Property APpr.r Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
Page 2 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0080
Z3-Jun-Z003 Jil"l Sl"Iith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11 : 34: Z 1
Non-Residential. Propertllj Add ress. Use. and Sal.es
COl"lparable sales value as Prop Addr: lZ5 BRIGHHJAT ER DR
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Tract: Z60.0Z
sales frol"l 2000 - 2001:
0 Sale Date DR Book/Page Price CQual/UnQ) Vac/Il"lp
Plat Inforl"lation 6 / 1. 999 10.558/Z.304 140.000 CM) I
1951 : Book OZ1 Pgs 03Z-033 9 /1. 99Z 8.031/ 486 515.000 (M) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 11/1.990 1.4Z1/1.Z84 515.000 (U) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 11/1.983 5.636/1. 901 350.000 (M) I
2002 Value EXEMP TIONS
Just/Market: 300.000 HOl"lestead: 0 Ownership ~ .000
Historic : 0 Use X: .000
Assessed/Cap: 300.000 Tax Exel"lp t X: .000
Other Exel"lp t : 0
Taxable: 300.000 Agricul tural: 0
2002 Tax In forl"lat ion Land Inforl"lation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Ballj
Cl.earlilater View:
02 Millage: Z3. Ull Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 6.981.33
1) 58 x lZO 65.00 6.993.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Hol"les 4) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
6.981.33 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exel"lptions, Total Land Value: 454.545
2002 taxes will be :
6.981.33
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. Z LOT 8
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 6/23/2003
,-
Pil!il1as County Property APp.r Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 OW
Page 3 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0080 :01
Z3-Jun-Z003 Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:34:Z8
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Hotel/Hotel < 4 St
Property Address: 1Z5 BRIGHTWATER DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Par ty Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roof Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cabinet & Mill
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Spread/Hono Footing
Slab on Grade
Conc Block/Stucco
o
None
None
Gable & Hip
Composition Shingle
Average
Carpet Combination
Plaster Furred
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 15
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
Wall Only
Ave rage
Rectangle
Ave rage
1. 953
Z5
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 Z. U8 7) .00 0
2) Open Porch . ZO 37Z B) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Commercial Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 1Z00SF 1. 00 1. ZOO 0 1. ZOO 999
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 1. ZOO
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][!]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 6/23/2003
BUKclWSKI, WLADYSLA W e e -/L (/ dJoo3 - 06 oJD
FIGUEREDO, RANDALL J MARKS, IRWIN J
BUKOWSKI,KJtYST~A FIGUEREDO, MISHA MARKS, DAWN D
345 HAMDEN DR 105 BRIGHTWATERDR 115 BRIGHTWATERDR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402
GRIFFIN, BARRY N JR KULACH, STANLEY BRIGHTW ATER INV
2775 PINE TREE RD KULACH,ANNA ESTABLISHMENT
LANSING MI 48911 - 150 BRIGHTW ATER DR ZOLLSTRASSE 9 FL-9490
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 VADUZ LIECHTENST 00004-
GERMANY
BRIGHTW ATER INV BRIGHTW ATER INV SUNNWAVES INC
ESTABLISHMENT ESTABLISHMENT 170 BRIGHTW ATER DR
ZOLLSTRASSE 9 FL-9490 ZOLLSTRASSE 9 FL-9490 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
VADUZ LIECHTENST 00004- VADUZ LIECHTENST 00004-
GERMANY GERMANY
MARSZALEK, ROMAN crus, MIECZYSLA W W CIEZCZAK, CHESTER
crus, MIECZYSLA W crus, MARlA CIEZCZAK, MARIA
166 BRIGHTWATERDR 162 BRIGHTW ATER DR 158 BRIGHTWATERDR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401
KULACH, STANLEY TAMBACK, EDWARD P JR OGRODNY, BOLESLA W
KULACH,ANNA TAMBACK, CAROLE E OGRODNY, ZOFIA
320 ISLAND WAY # 607 144 BRIGHTW ATER DR 140 BRIGHTW ATER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2181 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
BAUSTERT, DELBERT V ZORRILLA, EUGENE BRADLEY, ROBERT L
BAUSTERT, MARY LOU ZORRILLA, RAFAEL L 128 BRIGHTW ATER DR
134 BRIGHTW ATER DR 130BRIGHTWATERDR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
RINEKER INC JERNIGAN, GARY JERNIGAN, GARY L
124 BRIGHTWATERDR JERNIGAN, MARY A JERNIGAN, MARY A
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 6012 MARINERS WATCH DR 6012 MARINERS WATCH DR
TAMPA FL 33615 - TAMPA FL 33615-
SAUNDERS, WILLIAM BRIGHTW ATER ON THE BAY LENEART, RENEE TRE
SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY INC 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
333 HAMDEN DR 175 BRIGHTWATERDR CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2449 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2411
LENEART, RENEE TRE LENEART, RENEE TRE LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925 CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925 CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
I
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
e
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
e
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE LENEART, RENEE TRE P ALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE 8556 W WlNNEMAC AVE INC
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925 CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925 C/O W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401
W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
W AZIO, IRENA W AZIO, IRENA W AZIO, IRENA
C/O CLEARWATERBCHMOTEL C/O CLEARWATER BCH MOTEL C/O CLEARWATER BCH MOTEL
110 BRIGHTW A TER DR #4 110 BRIGHTW ATER DR #4 110 BRIGHTWATER DR #4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
WAZIO, EUGENIUSZ F BRAUKMAN ENTERPRISES INC ZURAWSKI, BOGDAN
W AZIO, IRENA 10863 BOBCAT TER ZURAWSKI, ANNA
110 BRIGHTWATERDR#4 LITTLETON CO 80124 - 9531 139 BRIGHTW ATER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2402
SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B CZAICKI, EDWARD TAS, JERRY
SHAH, MANNA J CZAICKI, BOZENA TAS, TERESA
326 HAMDEN DR 332 HAMDEN DR 342 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2448 CLEARW ATR BEACH FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451
2448
US-EURO-TRADE INC WILK, THOMAS J BAY LAWN
346 HAMDEN DR WILK, ST ASIA 406 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767- 451 HARBOR DR S CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2535
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL
33785 -
MARKS, IRWIN J MARKS, IRWIN J DE STEFANO, ROBERT W
MARKS, DAWN D MARKS, DAWN D DE STEFANO, DONNA L
115 BRIGHTWATERDR 115 BRIGHTWATERDR 125 BRIGHTW ATER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 CLEARWATER FL 33767- CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2402
DE STEFANO, ROBERT W KOEGLER, WALTER A BARROWS, SCOTT 0
DE STEFANO, DONNA L KOEGLER, JEAN A BARROWS, JUDY L
125 BRIGHTWATERDR 620 ARDEN LN 409 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 PITTSBURGH PA 15243 - 1132 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2536
CLIFFORD, RUTH M MINNITI, JOHN A SIMON, RICHARD A
180 TOWERLN MINNITI, JACQUELINE 1474 S PAIRIE AVE #D
ELK GROVE VLG IL 60007 - 4214 510 SYCAMORE TER CHICAGO IL 60608 - 2208
CINNAMINSON NJ 08077 - 3545
GERRITZMANN, DIETHARDT MORGAN, GEORGE W BARROWS, SCOTT 0
GERRITZMANN, GABRIELA V 122 BA YSIDE DR BARROWS, JUDY L
AM HAAG 12C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 130 BA YSIDE DR
65812 BAD SODEN 00004- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
GERMANY
- e
MEARS, ROBERT E SR MARTINOS, GEORGIOS D ROUSSEAU, CARL H
MEARS, BARRY L MARTINOS, DOROTHY ROUSSEAU, ELIZABETH E
PO BOX 2436 PO BOX 5940 160 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33757 - 2436 MILLER PLACE NY 11764 - 1225 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
MARKUS, DONALD S ALVERSON, LOUISE W EBBERT, KATHY S
MARKUS, MARIE E 444 MILLERSBURG RD 106 WINDWARD POINT
441 S ARLINGTON HEIGHTS PARIS KY 40361 - 2145 HENDERSONVILLE TN 37075-
ELLIS GROVE IL 62241 - 5108
DI GIOVANNI, AGOSTINO HORTZ, ERICH W SHERMAN, RICHARD
DI GIOVANNI, MARIANN 162 BAYSIDE DR SHERMAN, JUDY
163 BA YSIDE DR CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 PO BOX 2424
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 HEATH OH 43056 - 0424
MC INERNEY, STEVEN J V ASILAROS, SOPHIA V ASILAROS, JACK
MC INERNEY, BARBARA L V ASILAROS, JACK V ASILAROS, SOPHIA
105 BA YSIDE DR 111 BAYSIDE DR 119 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2502 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2502 CLEARWATERFL 33767-
FELDMAN, MARVIN J ROMAGNO, VITO ALCALDE, RICHARD
FELDMAN, LINDA ROMAGNO, ANNA 1620 LEEDS CASTLE
123 BA YSIDE DR 129 BA YSIDE DR INDIANA V A 22182 -
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2502
ZIOLA, THOMAS B OSKARSSON, LEIF BARNHART, RANDALL E
ZIOLA, KATHRYN M OSKARSSON, CYNTHIA BARNHART, DEBORAH E
1 CIRCLE DR 141 BAYSIDE DR 143 BAYSIDE DR
MONMOUTH BEACH NJ 07750 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2502
1152
CONTI, CAMILLO GREENBERG, MARTIN A CAPPELLO, LISA A
CONTI, LIVIA 835 MANDALA Y AVE CAPPELLO, JOSEPH A
136 BA YSIDE DR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2501 146 BAYSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2501
Clearwater Beach Association Housh Ghovaee Anthony Menna
Pres. David MacNamee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 21030 US 19 N
827 Mandalay Ave. 601 Cleveland St. #930 Clearwater, FL 33765
Clearwater, FL 33767 Clearwater, FL 33755
..
~~~
~~;"~~'
~~/~~~'I.
~C":t. - _ mrgr1 <tR
r::~ =- ,
~~~ - ~.
'"'~~~.~
~~~Jl~'i
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 17, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case FLD FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004 - 125 Brightwater
Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 16, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.8
feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building),
from 20 feet to 15.6 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an
increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to
back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and existing dock for
sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and
conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYr HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
~
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Two
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any
permits, including a detail for the wet standpipe;
4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5. That revised lot grading details, including swales and inverts conveying runoff to the pond at
the rear of the site, be submitted, to the satisfaction of Stormwater Engineering Department,
prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy; and
7. That revised landscape plans, including details showing the relationship of the proposed
driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations to ensure proper transitioning and
installation methods to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, be submitted prior to the
issuance of any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on October 1,2003 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
~
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page Three
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBrightwater 125 Belle Aqua Villas lIBrightwater 125
Development Order. doc