FLD2003-07032
.
II
.- ~~~;-~:~:~~~~::s~,
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #: Lo 0
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (stafiinitials):
ATLAS PAGE #: L 7 Ie
ZONING DISTRICT: \
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ~ t='~
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
:) Clearwater
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
. '
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
~ i--""
hi
i ~ c
I~~. n";n';r":r'\Vl IT; -,
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
f1n t1\Of\u\')e Y') 00,-
\
\~ \ () :~) L-,-- -:)t\ \.:0'-\ \ q
\ .
APPLICANT NAME:
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
, '\ (''I \ '.'
W -\..-----\.....{'O\-u...;Q..,\-tf" I -q=:,
/ (
PHONE NUMBER:. 1--1(,1 l1.<;. ---c() ,;1.. \
)l ci~ J-- B ::~{) L/
,~ f' y- n \ c. G:\ {\.
)
,3~ '/ It-,,S
MAILING ADDRESS:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
.--.
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
ri~' S - ; r
p \O\.-('U ./ ., 0,":\\(\ 0-0,,-(( :\
(Mustlnclude ALL own rs) \
B .. (~ LJ \\ . 7' -/,
AGENTNAME(S): . .. ~~)l)'--c,\",\ .' \a\~CAeL/_' \:~"~'~\'\:::)IC~E:- ~~\'\f'.e-i \In~'-\LJ,-C(:'''~
MAILING ADDRESS: LeO \ C\~\)(..\C~ \",2\ "St.,I ~j\e... -~\CL~{) iL l*,o.,\..L'(;~ -t'C i \=::\ }~~'~3D5
E-MAIL ADDRESS: f\ecci\-'('\\ '" ~'i\"\l r-asep\'(; iQJf,\4~E NUMBER: ~-\:L\ 2J e- ",)'tSC-o CJ
, ~.' ~)
CELL NUMBER:'''- \, FAX NUMBER: ~l{ \D-'- ?5(X~ (p
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
PARCEL NUMBER:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
l 3'-\. C ~-\E'S' \ Lll 7 5 5; {-4... IJYII
(acres, square feet) ) /' L- ,-
:::'3 \ ~ . L',,,' \ t- L) l.J: OL(;{\~) \1\e ~ )
(number of awelllng Units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
PARCEL SIZE:
< ~.. '\< \ b "(11/
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ~) e e.- L...-y--. \ Ij t -. -
(inciude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
II
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ~ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
. '
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located. ---- C" . \ '\ '\ 1/ ('\11
-:)t.C::- cj- ~\ l) q= n
,. \
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof. <. ".' .... Z , . 1 ' \ \ I \ \"\ I(
-..It:"' (' I '><'- \~l f\,-\- t~l
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. <.::::::. _ _ c.." \. . \. \ It 11"'.\.11
_J ec _' L>r:..f......., If) i\ ... \
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
C'
"){'L
C . '\ 1:
- ,-.... r"
lA<...\ \\ \) I,
I) flJt
5. The proposed development Is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
<C" c::'. \ ' \ " I (\ /I
_)ee~ l_yJ"'\,\ b\-t- \ r-j
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effec;ts, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties. <, '. LZ . \ 0 \ , '\ 1 \ W f
.'-.....) U2.-.'f.- ~'" \. '0 l t:: 4
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INF1LL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, Intensity
and development standards. .
~1~..o c:; _, "\ . \ .\ II C\i{
~ "- '--' ~ ~\ () l+: ~
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
--
2.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with lhe
improvements.) C:::._ c' \. "\. . \.' 11 1-\.11
) f" t' LH.x:'\i---', J;I
,
3.
The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
C ' <:::;' \ . \. . \ I I. \'~ Il
'-..Je e_ L-\{..\\\ (J,' .., . ' I 1,
4.
The uses or mix of use within the comprehe~,e infill redevelog;entproi,ect a~e compatibrle ~ith adjacent land uses.
o C ,e.- ( ,-X\-~\\ \:J ; .~- 1\ tr)' \
5.
Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of clearwater.C')' ~ ," 7" \ '\.' \ 1\ le:-: 1\
~ ce..- c..~.~""'\\.o I.~' t--,
6.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development. <'~" S\' \' r' .+ [[ f\11 "
',-- t.~ c---)C\\\) I.
7.
The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
C::-'
-'Jf-t.-
c:-' '\ \
L)(\\t D;- .,.
i\ flJi
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
~~f'L.- ~\,,~ \~) ~ ~:....t \ f\ it
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on'street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
..~e'~ i.*~\J\+'
I \ \~ 11
I
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
5 c 't'_
c~ \ ,\ '\
L'f-t\\ \;)1-:-
'\ '.:~ 1/
~'I'
Page 3 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application .. Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved; . .
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4M202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;"
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utiiities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Oftsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DSH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL
0 LANDSCAPE PLAN:
- All existing and proposed structures;
- Names of abutting streets;
- Drainage and retention areas including swa
- Delineation and dimensions of all required
- Sight visibility triangles;
- Delineation and dimensions of all parking a
- Proposed and required parking spaces;
- Existing trees on-site and imm,ediately adja
required tree survey);
- Location, size; description, specifications a
common names;
- Typical planting details for trees, palms, sh
protective measures;
- Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or s
percentage covered;
- Conditions of a previous development appr
-. Irrigation notes
0 REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8
0 IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two
0 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROG
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL
4-202.A.21 )
0 STORMWATER PLAN including the followi
- Existing topography extending 50 feet beyo
- Proposed grading including finished floor el
- All adjacent streets and municipal storm sy
- Proposed stormwater detention/retention ar
- Stormwater calculations for attenuation and
- Signature of Florida registered Professional
0 COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to iss
0 COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORM
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBM
Required in the event the application includes a
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment projec
0 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides
0 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four side
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Sect
0 All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs;
to remain.
0 All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs
0 Comprehensive Sign Program application, as ap
0 Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Developme
.
REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-11 02.A)
les, side slopes and bottom elevations;
perimeter landscape buffers;
reas including landscaping islands and curbing;
cent to the site, by species, size and,lqcations, including dripline (as indicated on
nd quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
rubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
haded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
oval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
% X 11) (color rendering if possible)
and Three applications)
RAM application, as applicable
REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
ng requirements:
nd ail property lines;
evations of all structures;
stems;
ea including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
water quality;
Engineer on all plans and calculations
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
uance of City Building Permit), if applicable
WATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
ITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
t or a Residential I nfi II Project.
of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
s of building with coiors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
ion 3-1806)
Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
plicable (separate application and fee required).
submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
nt Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in t~\~\\\llIII/IIIRTATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS I1J tl:-
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowled~f{.~~~a Ann ;iff, n to and subscribed before me this ..-E1- day of
authonze City representatives to visit and photograph the ~p~,';:;st'..6';;~" " A.D. 2 and/or by
d in this application. .' ~v. ~ 01\1 . 0 is personally knowl'i""""' as
as
Page 6 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
Sent ,By: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SE'lljES;
7274468036;
03 Jul Oilli:29AM;JOb a9B;page 2/2
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will s~rve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee with lIallllSlde
InglRelring Sirvices, Inc. to act as an agent fo~,' ,~ c, 'i l-- ~ .J ~ ~~" \ ~ c,. '" ,~ ,-v\ Civ'l c\ () ~ r 1\ 'yo "'-
(property Owners Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
\ \ L., 13 -r 1 ~ l~\ + "" c. of.;: t' d Y i -0< J lying within
(Property Location)
f(jA n -: \ ( c, ~ County, State a!, Fie v - c ( c.,
/~--2J 0 =-1../; .~ ~ . '"-"'''i L. 'J "':' ~ , '( , ~
/ /),,1(1,'1 , /"", ,,/, , "'4 ( / /JAJ) "^ C'I--i C'A, "'"'J~-r ^, ~ '" .....
,"L, ,.,f / :. J:./L/ll,,<.....M/~ ..c.. -1' J
SignatUre f Property Owner I print Name of Property' Owner
LD t \ l- ,v\ C',. '\ rt <(' ~ v,.h,-~ <:.. t... cA.;(" ? I '~" ~' 5 S -:-' S CY b '-I
-'. -
Address of Property Owner Telephone Number
---:-' "~- -
, \ c~. "'-<. 9 t,- 1- ( (j j 'c d c, <~ :;; ix , ,~
.. J, '
City/State/Zip Code
County of
ffo(lr6JA- The forelJlling instrument was acknowledge before me Ihis _,07-,- day
n b7 '
~{)iAj'f.",Of~,20~~,_,bY_- ,.. ~- ,8S_,-:-:::-
who is personally known to me or who hss produced i===\0V: \ p,L' _\) u,L"
35 identilir;alion and wtlo did (did not) take an oath.
Slaleof
FL{>L# J {, S 2 -S',?) _ :> 3,XYf-O
'Fe,? l- ::I J oS 2-2 '7 2 -I1J~ 0 _ ~ ():'X ~. . ~~ _~ Notary Public
(Signature) .
Commission # cc. r 0 2L...6 t -
WQe..\ ~,w~h (Na~lI~ of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamp6d)
(SEAL ABOVE)
>",JHlJl Wael Abu~Asab
~ff:~i~~commiSSion # CC 902268
::_ \ j;: Expires Feb. 26,2004
..,'f!;.......",..,~ Bonded, Thru
,Y!,,q~~~\,, At18nt~'
~__'-'~~"C';:;;"'~""-J-""c"'''=''C==-
'Sent By': ,t'olC!RTH5IDE ENGINEERING S'ER..;' 7274468036;
14 AugD2 .1 AMjJob 196jpage 2/2
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter wilt serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee
, . (.gent Nj1\'11e)
with Hurtllsjde Engineerinu Serviees,lnc. to act as an agent for
- ,IA^ ~
I, ~>U,r;1 J \;r~~'::v~ ner';;::;n~Y\ \ C ,,~ r-
And to execute any and all ocuments related to securIng permits and
_l.
approvals for the construction on the property generally located at
(PT'operty Location}
A
~ ^ . .3.c2V--A\jc,V\'
/7 7 r--;-- ~
dgYL 'h/ltgtln
Print Na e of property: Owner
,
J
of Pro y Owner Jl
1 2.0 'Rf:'1 k.t-\rJ'i:fq" J~,
Address of Property Owner
_ ( lec>/~wW 'rt;..,
Cjty/StatalZip Code
Titlo
Telephone Number
Statt} of _~
County of ~~~
5t---
The foregoing instrument was aCKl10wledge before me this ~L"_ day
~ ;Ji!;Q(~,.J .
of _ I 20 J'.i,);;Pv ~.f MNf' . as t,
wiN illo pC"'inn::1~,^,R I~C-or who has produced d.mV'
IU as identificatIOn and who did (uid clOt) lake an o~th.
fit Ram ~ GGcl
~!;) ::CnmmKrlm:J #~
~ ,;,~ .Expires JID.y 3. 3116 ~
~1Jlt~ ~ l5cmde412m1 A ~ ~
'm\\~ M:1antic llond!ugOl...1nc:. ~ f:.t. ~ ___ Notary Public
'(Signa1ure) -=
. Commission #- ]) j) l"S- ~
f!..A H A .~~~aml:l of Notary Typed. printed. or Stamped}
(SEAL ABOVE)
--
e
fr-'-:::-~,o:~:'-'--~~~:: i] pry rs
116 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas II
,..~,~::..~- ,. .
Revised
, ,
Exhibit A to Comprehensive Jnfill Redevelopment Project applicatiol;tJ 'i
"I ,
I:"''''
,
NES Project #0234.
. '
Description of Request: To construct a six unit, four (4) story, attached dwelling town
home use (3 floors ofliving area above one level of parking), with reductions to the
required side (east) setbacks from 10' to 5.2' to the building, and from 10' to 9.6' to
pavement and reductions to the required side (west) from 10' to 6.2' to the building and
from 10' to 9' to pavement, reductions to the required rear setback from 20' to 0' to the
boardwalk, from 20' to 13.9' to the pools and from 20' to 16.2' to the building and with
an increase of building height from 35' to 40.33' and to permit parking that is designed to
back out into the public right-of-way from the proposed individual garages. The existing
docks will remain for the sole use of the on-site residents.
Written Submittal Requirements (Section 3-913. A)
1. This site is located within the Small Motel district and is currently occupied by
two, one-story overnight accommodation uses consisting of six (6) units each.
The land coverage being requested is consistent with surrounding properties and
less than that of the existing structure as this area consists of more intense uses
such as older, small, motels with little to no on-site parking. Additionally, the
majority of existing motel uses in the vicinity maintain paved parking areas that
spill out into the right-of-way. The proposed four (4) story, six-unit residential
townhome structure is consistent with the scale and bulk of adjacent and
surrounding residential properties and will be less intense than that of the current
one-story overnight accommodation use on site. The proposed side setback
reductions are less intrusive than that of the existing one story motel use. With
the way that Brightwater Drive is developing into a street of condominiums and
town homes as opposed to the smaller existing motels, the proposed building will
not appear to be "overwhelming" to the adjacent properties. The flavor of this
area is changing and the proposed "Italian villa" style architecture will be a grand
addition to Brightwater Drive. In order for this project to be a viable one, the units
themselves must remain at the square footage proposed. By reducing the width of
the units to less than the proposed IT or by reducing the total number of units on
site to less than six, the town homes become unattractive to potential purchasers
due to either size or price and therefore the project becomes un-marketable.
Today's market virtually mandates the proposed unit size and setbacks for these
projects to be viable. Significant landscaping is being proposed in order to buffer
adjacent sites from the town home building proposed. Even with the proposed
zero foot rear setback to the boardwalk and 13.9' rear setback to the pools, these
proposed rear setbacks are less intense than other developments in the immediate
area that have zero rear setbacks to accommodate pool decking. The proposal
1
e
e
includes totally enclosed individual garage parking, accessed by typical individual
single-family dliveways. The request to reduce the required side yard setbacks to
the driveways will not adversely impact the adjacent sites as these are individual
driveways as opposed to a mass open parking lot situation. The request to increase
the allowable height from 35' to 40.33' is justifiable in that the Beach By Design
program allows for two to four levels of living area above parking. Section 2-
803 of the Gity of Clearwater Community Dev,elopment Code allows for heights
between 35'-100' through the Flexible Development process. The proposed
height will allow for adequate ceiling heights based on today's standards as well
as appropriate scale for the proposed architectural style. The existing boat dock is
to remain as is with three boat slips and will be for the sole use of the property
owners. The existing boats docked on site will not remain and will be removed
prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed building. A
three story, 9 unit, town home project was recently approved by CDB with similar
side and rear yard setbacks, directly to the east of the subject site. That adjacent
property owner has submitted a letter of support for the proposed proj ect which is
included within this application package.
2. The proposed single-family "villa style" town home development will not hinder
or discourage redevelopment of the surrounding area as the proposal meets the
intent of the Beach by Design program for the Small Motel district. With the
constmction of this upscale "villa style" waterfront residential town home use and
tropical landscaping, other sUlTounding property owners will be encouraged to
come closer into compliance with the intent ofthe Beach by Design program. The
design of the proposed proj ect will be aesthetically pleasing to passers-by and
adjacent sites and will be a significant improvement to the sUlTolmding
community. Additionally, Strategies for Revitalization calls for the conversion of
this area to two to four level townhouses and time-shares above parking as
proposed.
3. The proposed six -unit, single-family townhome use will create less of an adverse
impact to llsers of the area than the more intense surrounding and on-site motel
uses as the site will be occupied by long-term residents (homeowners) as opposed
to transient tenants. Visibility triangles will be maintained to ensure pedestrian
and vehicular safety. The request to back out into the right-of-way is due to the
single-family homeowners having individual driveways as opposed to a "mass
parking area". A retention area will be constmcted at the rear of the site
eliminating runoff onto adjacent properties.
4. The minimization oftraffic impact being generated from the site is realized by the
proposed single-family townhome use. Other permitted uses within the Tourist
zoning district such as restaurants, retail sales, marina facilities, etc, could
generate much heavier traffic for the immediate area and prove to be an adverse
impact in intensity for the Brightwater Drive right-of-way as opposed to the
proposed single-family development.
5. The majority of the immediate vicinity consists oflow scale motel buildings built
in the 60's and 70's with non-uniform signage. The future vision of the Small
Motel district is for two to four story townhomes and timeshares over parking.
This proposal is a step in the right direction in order to achieve that vision for the
2
--
.
immediate vicinity. No freestanding signage is proposed for this site which along
with the proposed enclosed parking will reduce visual blight along the
Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Proposed setbacks are typical for the
surrounding area.
6. The proposed development will enhance the visual character ofthe neighborhood,
increase surrounding property values and shall not be a negative impact in regards
to acoustics, and olfactory issues as a more intense commercial use may be. On-
site lighting will not adversely impact surrounding properties, as all exterior
lighting will be limited to individual attached fixtures for each unit. No spillage
onto adjacent properties will occur. Noise intrusion onto adjacent properties is not
anticipated over and above what the typical single-family use would produce.
Individual roll-out trash cans will be utilized by each homeowner and will be kept
within the garage areas except on sanitation pick-up days.
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria
1. This site is located within the Small Motel district. Currently the site is occupied
with two six-unit overnight accommodation uses. The proposal includes razing
the existing motel uses on site and developing the site with a six-unit, four-story
townhome structure. Similar and more intense side setback reductions exist on
site now with the motel uses and the existing front setbacks are more intrusive
than the proposed 20' setback for the proposed project. The applicant is
proposing to construct mid-level, luxury, "villa style" town homes compatible
with the Beach by Design program. The proposed floor plans consist of
individual enclosed garage parking on the first level with three floors ofliving
area above. Each garage space will acconnnodate two vehicles for a total of 12
parking spaces. Driveways will be separated from the adj acent drive by a
landscape island with the exception of the four center driveways. These central
drives will be joined within the right-of-way but once on the site will be separated
with a landscape island. These driveways will be typical of a single-family use
and should not adversely impact the adjacent sites with their proximity to the side
property lines, as would an open parking lot for a condominium or commercial
use. The typical single-family driveway area proposed is the reason for the need
to back out into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. Due to the proposal being a
single-family residential townhome use, the number of vehicles backing into the
right-of-way will be minimal. Additionally, the maintenance of visibility
triangles on site will ensure safety for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The side
setback reductions being requested for the building itself are a result of an
irregularly shaped site. The requested side setback reductions to the building will
allow the site to be developed with residential units of adequate width for the
upscale style waterfront type living being offered. lfthe units were to be reduced
in size in order to provide greater setbacks, these town homes would be less
desirable for purchase and would then become a non-viable project. Similar and
more intrusive side setbacks exist within the area so that the proposed side
setback will not be inconsistent with the surrounding area. The zero foot rear
setback being requested is for the accommodation of a boardwalk running parallel
,..,
:J
-
.
to the seawall. This boardwalk will allow for access to the existing docks fTom
the individual units. The rear setback of 13.9' for the proposed individual pools
will allow for a minimal size pool for use only by the residents on site. The
applicant is proposing to retain the existing docks as an amenity for the
homeowners on site. Although the applicant is requesting to increase the
allowable height from 35' to 40.33', the Beach By Design program allows for two
to four levels of living area above parking. T~ existing boat docks provide four
boat slips. Any existing boats on site will be removed prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy. A minimum of six townhomes of the size and caliber
proposed is needed to make this project financially viable.
2. The proposed residential use will likely enhance property values in the area by
providing new, quality, residential construction and significant landscaping on
site. Per the property appraiser's office, the existing value is $695,000.00. This
proposed townhome development would significantly improve the value of the
site to approximately $3,000,000.00. This increase in value and the draw oflong-
term residential homeowners into the immediate area will generate additional tax
dollars for the City of Clearwater.
3. The City of Clearwater permits attached dwellings as proposed. Additionally, the
proposed four-story townhome project is consistent with the vision of the Beach
by Design program for the Small Motel district.
4. The proposed six-unit single-family residential townhomes are compatible with
the surrounding land uses as many of the neighboring motels maintain long lease
tenants. Many of these existing overnight accommodation uses are being replaced
with single-family town home and condominium uses. Additionally, the infill of
the proposed single-family use will allow for less traffic congestion within the
area, which will be a positive impact for surrounding uses. Also, Strategies for
Revitalization call for the conversion of this Small Motel district area to two to
four level townhomes and time shares above parking.
5. At this time, properties are not readily available for this type of upscale, single-
family, waterfront, townhome development within this immediate desirable area.
The location of Brightwater Dlive being on the Intracoastal Waterway and in
between two residential fingers makes this proposal a compatible development for
the area in addition to being consistent with the intent of the Clearwater Beach by
Design program.
6. The immediate vicinity ofthe subject parcel will be upgraded aesthetically not
only by the architectural design of the new townhomes but also by the proposed
landscaping and single-family residential use. The existing motels on site
encroach into the required front yard setback, provide minimal landscaping and
parking areas extend into the right-of-way.
7. The proposed development will playa role in the continuous positive changes of
Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a newly revitalized site and
new buildings with long term residents. The proposal will provide on site parking,
thereby eliminating any need for related parking within the right-of-way. The
proposed site plan, inclusive of landscaping, will be a significant improvement to
the surrounding area. In addition, the bringing in of affluent single-family
property owners will trigger the increase of tax dollars for the City and will
4
.
e
trigger an increase in revenue for businesses within the surrounding beach and
downtown communities.
8. The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
construction of an attractive, villa style, residential project on a site currently
occupied by an outdated and small overnight accommodation use. The proposed
project reflects the City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is
consistent with Beach by Design. The site is generally unmarketable and
unusable without the approval of the setbacks being requested and to back out
fTom residential driveways into the Brightwater Drive right-of-way. The setback
reductions being proposed are similar and less intrusive than the existing setbacks
of the motel on site. Allowing the backing out of vehicles into the right-of-way
from this site will only add to the realization of the typical passersby that this is a
single-family use as opposed to overnight accommodations. The requested
increase in height will allow for units with adequate ceiling heights based on
today's market and a building that will be in scale with the architectural design.
9. Adequate, enclosed parking will be provided on site. The proposal, as part of a
Flexible Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 parking spaces
per dwelling unit or 9 spaces. The proposal includes two spaces per dwelling unit
for a total of 12 parking spaces thereby eliminating the need for parking within
the right-of-way. This feature alone will help to reduce on street parking which
only increases traffic congestion.
10. The design of the proposed townhome building complies with the Tomist
District/Beach by Design guidelines in many ways. On site parking is being
provided within fully enclosed garages on the first level. The proposal is for a
four-story townhome structure and Beach by Design contemplates conversion of
this area to two to four level townhouses and time-shares above parking. The
proposed architectural design and tropical landscaping will be aesthetically
pleasing. The proposed landscaping will lend in differentiating Clearwater Beach
from other beach areas as it will be helping to bring the immediate area closer into
compliance with Code. The residential design of the proposed project will help to
create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" and the street level ofthis
project will be pedestrian and vehicular friendly due to the maintenance of all
required visibility triangles. The enclosed garage spaces on site and lack of on-
street parking will also lend to an aesthetically pleasing proj ect in lieu of massive
open parking areas and parking within the right-of-way.
5
.
.
DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING:
THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT
STREETS
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS;
COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY.
, '
Page 2
. Se[1t. By: NdRTHS'IDE ENGINEERING~~R~.. j 7274468036 i
14 A~g02 e1AM;JOb 296;page 2/2
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee
(.genl Name)
with Nortllside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for
- "A~ l~
( :>(7.""'1 J- "f(;r~';;y,: ner';~~n~Y\. \ C t!~ V'-- ._J.
And to execute any and all ocurnents related to securing permits and
apprDvals for the construction on the property generally located at
i
!
of Pro y Owner /
. '-.... J
1 2-0 !-)f:1 kJ--v-hJ:cr -~,
Address of Property Owner
C leG~PF~W 'FI;,
City/State/Zip Code
c......". ~
~I . Jl2rA\jc,V\ ,
jjgr~ ::J6l1l1CZn
Print Na e of Property Owner
Title
Telephone Number
stat~ of _~~
County ot V;~
Sf-'
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this _~L.--- day
~ ~1f1(f4I,J .
of ~ ,20.ri);..JJY ~ -1 HAlf ' as "
. 1AlI1~ is l='("'jon~ll~Q",:R l~e Of who has produced ~V'
I as identificatIOn and who did (dill not) lak.e an oath.
m RamA~
gl::. ~Cnmmkrl~ #DDm1155
~~ ~ Expires - 3. 3Di ~ 6:.-e)
~ l1F ~ ~;: lloDl1e4 12ttu A
iI'i',rnt\" Atlantic Bcmd!ngth,lDc. \.-- 1-\ . ____ Notary PIlblic
~~~~ -
Commission #- ]) j) I tJr ~
(!..)r H A . c::;-~ ~arfla of Notary Typed. Printed or stamped)
(SEAL ABOVE)
Re?e;ved: 71 71 3 8:56AM; ~
07/07/2003 08:40 8138861855
:;Slll oy; I'IV" I nOJ,UI;; l:IUJ.l.lu::r:nJ.1UJ ou::n'f ......1;;",
8138861855 -> NO. RTHSIDE.A:>. ... INEERING SERVICES" P
.. ' age 2
PAKMAILM177- PAGE 02
r c.,.....uuv...u, ,.,ItJ .....~".. wow .... "'_Mlff I"" ""'"" ---,' ....:7~ -,-
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION,
This letter will ,serve as authorization for Housh GhOV&88 with 1.1IIIIId8
...... SlnlClS.IIC. to act as an agent for G v.. ri L - ~ y'''\\ 1 C. '" ,J. IV\ c-'l G\.. :)~,.. J\ 'j'''1''
(Property Owner's Name)
And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits
and approvals for the construction on the property generally located on the
\ \ u' 13....1 ~ ~ -+ \rJ c^'t~ r ch.. 1...1< I . "thO
. ' , ytng WI In
{Property Location} .
,t..e. \ ( c.." County, Stilt~ of 5' 0 "V ~ c{ c.,
" \ ~ ____ Gc, r, L" --:r ~,.... '" " 1: t t'\..
"^ C-I'-{ 0.., 'J"...........' '" , '5 ... ...
-"",, - ~
Print Name of Pmperty Owner
'91~" ~5S--~C;- 6'-1
',.1~;rM)
Owner
l.o c \ L. ~fr ~ \ ~ < y..s \}...}C,..~ ~ l c~....
AddreSl; of Property Owner .
'IC' V\^- ~J.r-= (0"/- d b ~ S Lv' ~
City/State/Zip Code
Telephone Number
SlaUl: of ,F-[ot::Z-ln4 Tne foregoing instl'\lme/lt was 8(:knowledge befOfB I11tll"iS -, 0 7-.~ day
_Q tJ7
county(Jf.,~1:Jbbafi)i\Of~.20~~_.DY~_,..,., ~ ,as~.~.
who Is pVrsonallY known 10 me or wM has producec:2 ~tQ'n/e:\ 9,b. t\) .,~~
3S ldentific~llon and wtlo did (did not) take an oattl,
F-LP.I.-# J 6S 2..-5'8") ~ s] -XYf-O
FcPL-:J JS52_2''n-l1.J-1l.. ~0~ ~.~ _No,",ypublic
(Sign"aure)
CommisSion # CC.. '}' 0 2.-2-' i '
wo....d ~., ~dh (Name of NOtary Typ8d. Printed or Stamped)
(SEAL ABOVE)
~'l/l~;. wa.el Ab'l-As~b
!In:&" ~~COIl\TIli!~ioll #: CC 90226~
~~ ,1i~ Exp;1'elI Feb. 26, 2004
_~ . .~l BOl\d~ ThrlJ
~" fif'N,,'- At\sl\t.lr. Bn din\!: (';0., 1l\~'
II fll" ~ '
..:..-;;-;::::-_.----::--
.
.-
(J .;:) 3 L)
.' ._~ ..~::; ."'-
C, i i .-L7
....... t..7
ROGERS BEACH DEVELOPMENT
P.O. Box 676 . Crystal Beach, Florida 34681.727-512-0468.727-789-2982 Fax . rjrogers16@aol.com
8/14/03
City of Clearwater
100 S, Myrtle Ave'.
Clearwater FL 33767
Attn. Wayne Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
RE: Upcoming Development on Brightwater Drive
, '
"
Mr. Wells,
I would like to thank you for your help and support as we move forward with our
redevelopment projects on Clearwater Beach. I presently have over 12 projects in various
stages of construction or planning, with our anticipated sales to be well over
$200,000,000.00. In short the economic foresight Beach by Design dreamed of is
beginning to be realized. Properties like the ones we replaced at 200 Brightwater Drive,
which had a tax value between $ 500,000.00 and $600,000.00, now have a basis of
$5,000,000.00 to $6,000,000.00; this truly is a winning situation for the city and its aging
infrastructure, as well as myself, my investors' and our home buyers.
As you are aware a competing developer, Anthony Menna has submitted 2 projects to
the City for consideration. I would like to welcome him to the beach and ask that you
support him in any way you or the staff can.
Specifically on the project located at 118 and 120 Brightwater Drive, to the immediate
west of our Brightwater Cove development. Although staff has expressed concerns over
this design, I think it helps add to the " Village" look we have tried to create. Also as the
owner of the adjoining property I am not opposed to the requested relief as to the set back
requirements.
In closing, I again ask for your support of these projects and even though I have not
spoken to Mr. Menna}I am sure he would agree that by working together we can make the
revitalization of Clearwater Beach something we all can be proud of.
~
',.,;Y
I.:o~
~.
~'~
. Y.',;:;:.,
Thank you for your assistance with this matter.
~.~
!~oland R~
8/19/ 2 9:35AM;
19 2002 8: 34PM Hf&SERJET 3200
_> NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES' Page 2
~ARlEEN f" Ilo UltK. ~~. It \#f,
PIlflLAS COUNTY> FLORlOO
~.-
--------~------------------------------
~RRY GOTfLlEB, ESQ.
i:.lrrU!J & G01TLIEB, P.A.
24'7~ ENTfuuorosE ROAD, SUITE 100
CLEARWATER, FLOIUDA 33763
(717) 791-1977/FAX (727) 191-8090
7C1B5B73 09-05-2001 10:01:31 EBZ
51 DEn-JERHIGAH.
035872
1#:01310187 BK:11560 SPG:1759 EPG:l~0
RECORDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50
DOC STAMP - OR219 . 3 $3,052.00
,..~ .......
. . THIS DoCUMENT WAS PREpARED BY
AND SHOUll> BE RETURNED TO:
PAGES )--
ACel
REC~
. 0R219~O
OS
INT
FEES
MTF
PIC
REV
. TOTAL 3.. Q ~~r{O WITNESSETH, that said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of One
, CK BA!r Dollar and other good and valuable consideratiou to said Grantor in hand paid by said
HG AM Grantees, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold
to the said Grantees, and Grantees' heirs and assigns forever, the following described
land:
WARRANTY DEED
(~689.02, F .8.)
TUTAL:
am< AMT. m<<RED:
. CWlHlI:
If{ _wrorv CLE!i1(
01-310187 SPT- 5-2001 1O:02Al'I
PINELLRS CO 8K 11560 PG 1758
11111 U~1111l1 \\1111 Ullll1 IMII 1111
$3,062.50
$3,062.50
$,00
G&G File No. 01-0609
This DEED, made and executed as indicated
below, between Escape Motel, Inc., a Florida corporation, whose post office address is
2475 Enterprise Road, Suite 100, Clearwater, FL 33763 [Grantor); and Gary Jernigan
and Mary A. Jernigan, husband and wife, whose post office address is 6012 Mariner's
Watch Drive, Tampa, FL 33615 [Grantees].
Lot 53, Bayside Subdivision, No.2, according to the map or plat thereof as
recorded in Plat Book 27, Page 32, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida.
Parcel Number: 08-29-15-0493-000-0530;
and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the
same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS MIEREOF. the Grantor has signed this instru!llent.
GRANTOR: ESCAPE MOTEL, INC.
WITNE
~.f dJ .;;", ~
[ DENICE HO~~ [
MARGARET C. DIORIO
]
8/19/ 2 9:36AM; ~
IS 2002 8:34PM H~SERJET 3200
-> NORTHSIDE iliINEERING SERVICES;
Page 3
10.3
.,' ~.
WARRANTY DEED
- PAGE 2
PINELLRS COUNTY rLA,
OFF.REC.8K 11580 PG 1780
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) ss.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on August 30, 2001, by
Jerry Gottlieb, President of Escape Motel Inc., a Florida corpoJa1;ion, who is personally
known to me or who produced a driver's license as ide~l . \
. A/
Notary Public
.&if(~ MAIl8AAET C. D'ORIO
f.'W~!'! J. !~ MY ClIof. MIS801 j cc &n44
~ ' expIRES: JB/IIIIY 4, 2002
, .. 81.11d1d Thill NoIIlry NIIID IildlMdta..
It
RE PARCEL lD #: 08/29/15/04932/000/0540
.-
KARl1 ...-. DE 8Il1KER, CLERK lJf UJURT
PltfLLAB COO, FLGRIDA
8C166853 08-31-2001 12:33:29 ~JB
51 OED-RAY .
O(XX)OO 3010 - 00000171
In:OnO'105B B!{;11556 SPG=0626 EPG:062.7
REroRDING 002 PAtH 1 $10.50
DOG STAMP - DR219 3 $2,730.00
TOTAL:
ClfCK AIIT, TENDERED:
CPARGE AMOONT:
BV ~_ DEPUTY CLERK
~'J.6J
J0;\r~ f .
N~ '
~ .
\ THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY:
Jane \-Yhy
SeaCoast Title, Inc.
18395 Gulf Boulevard, Suite 101
Indian Shores, Florida 33785
~r ~
'b
$2,7<10.50
$2,730.00
$10.50
RECORD AND RETURN TO:
SeaCoast Title, Inc.
18395 Gulf Boulevard, Suite 101
Indian Shores, Florida 33785
01-307058 RUG-3!-2001 12'34
PINELlAS CO Bk 11556 PG . 8~~
j 11l!11 I/illlllllllllll Jill/11m 1I11111~ /III
WARRANTY DEED
THIS WARRANTY DEED made this 31st day of August, 2001 by Linda G, Ray, an unmarried woman, hereinalkr
called Grantor, and whose address is 116 BrightwatcI- Drive, Clearwater, FL 33767.24Ql to Gary L Jernigan and Mary
A. Jel'lligall, husballd and wife, herdnafter caHed Grantee and whose address is 6012 Mariners Watch Drive, Tampa, FL
33615.
(Wher.;:;ver used herein the term "grantD:r~ ami HI"rranleeh incLude an the parHes to {bi~ instnu:n~nt and the-
(leirs, legal representatives and .;lss!gns: of individuals, and the. i)'\1cce~SOrs and assigns of corporalions.)
WITNESSETH:
THAT the Grantor, .for and in consideratiou of Lhe sum of Ten and NO/lOa Dollars and other valusblc
considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, h~reby grants, bargains, $t;[]s, Wiens, remises, releases, conveys
and confirms unto the Grantee, aU that certain !"nd situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Flodda. \'lZ:
Lot 54, BAYSIDE SUBDMSION NO, 2, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
27, Pages 32 and 33, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
r'" A~
t....,"..
,........~,. F
R~Cl
DP.~.l};;l.+219 v V
I..;. ." ........--.______
i~.l r _.___
F-"..
~ :,l.~'
:",'IT!'
F .,',
RE,; .___
- T01N.:.J/~0. g)
- CK SAL ~o.YJ
CHGAMT~
T'-"
SUBJECT TO taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2000.
SUBJECT TO covenants, restrictions and easements of record, if any; however, this reference thereto shall not
operate to reimpose same.
,T~GETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise
appcrtarnmg.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever.
AND the Grantor he~eby covenants with sai,d Grantee that the Gran~or is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple;
that ,the Grar:tor has good nght and lawful authonty to sell aud convey smd land; thal the Grantor hereby fully warrarlts
the title to Said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoewr; aud that said land is frc~
of all encumbrances.
, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, rh~ said Grantor h"s signed <lnd "cared these presents the cluy and yeur first abov<:
wntten.
PoSge I
rorm .sorrware by AUlonl:atl!Q RlJill Em(1 scrvrces.lnc. 1-BOD-3.30y1.2:i5
1S602
.~
.
PINELLRS COUNTY FLR,
OFF,REC.BK 11558 PG 627
~f a~c
Ia.aY(j
ltness 19nature "?l
/::;;;."'rZ I '- s:il:.v:> / J.E.-.J :b-JS-S c:
WItness Prmted SIgnature
STATE OFFLORID^
COUNTY OF PlNELLAS
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 31st day of August, 2001 by Linda G. Ray, an unmarried
woman. She has produced as identificlltion.
~
("fIde or Rank)
NOtary PrInted SIgnature
(SerialNo-, il any)
"""u~.y, JANE E. WHY
lM ,1Y COMM]<>SION # CC 768092
"'~,il'
?/.f Or f\.G~ ExPrRE.S: JOJ2~J2001
} [.filJ(joJ.}:OTAR'i JI~ N,;.,t:ll),,servlce1&.acfldmg(o.
P.,gC2
rerm Sottware.by Automated Real Estate Sc;rvice-s,lnc. r-800.:330-1235
15S02
Nonhside
;; ,j
: _'~_," @/-/", ~~, ~ 1-.( _
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
.
.
i,'l!
"/.'//:" Ii)
L/Lil>,,:__,!n
',j.
.
'11.
STORMWATER REPORT
FOR:
BELLE AQUA VILLAS II
PROJECT
L
August 2003
Project No.: 0234
-
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO. :
EXISTING CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV,AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
.
SF =
SF =
SF =
6,617 SF =
0.34 ACRES
0,19 ACRES
0,00 ACRES
0.15 ACRES
14,775 SF
8,158 SF OF IMP, AREA @ CN =
o SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
6,617 SF OF PERV. AREA @ CN =
98
100
CN =
85.01
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV,AREA=
C=
0.59
T.O.C, =
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
CN CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV,AREA=
CN =
90,50
C CALCULATIONS
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA=
IMP. AREA=
POND AREA=
PERV.AREA=
C=
0.72
T.O.C, =
14,775 SF
8,158 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C =
o SF OF POND AREA @ C =
6,617 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C =
0.9
1
0.2
" MINUTES
SF =
SF =
SF =
3,831 SF =
0,34 ACRES
0,25 ACRES
0.00 ACRES
0.09 ACRES
14,775 SF
10,798 SF OF IMP. AREA @ CN =
146 SF OF POND AREA @ CN =
3,831 SF OF PERV, AREA @ CN =
98
100
14,775 SF
10,798 SF OF IMP, AREA @ C =
146 SF OF POND AREA @ C =
3,831 SF OF PERV, AREA @ C =
0,9
1
0,2
, MINUTES
It
.
PROJECT NAME:
Belle Aqua Villas II
PROJECT NO. :
234
POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA:
AREA STORAGE
AC CF
T.O.B. EL.= 0.060 2,203
2,317 0.053 1,222
D.H.W. EL.= 2,009 0.046 1,091
1,960 0.045 1,014
W.Q. EL.= 1,911 0.044 938
1,529 0.035 414
BOTTOM EL.= 0.026 0
TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS:
DRAINAGE AREA =
14,775 SF
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH =
IN
REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME =
923 CF
PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =
FT
AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY =
CF
-
e
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: Belle Aqua Villas 11 ,0234,25YR,24HR,PRE
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE 11 FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.34 ac.
SCS Curve Number 85.01
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
-
e
'i"
N
N
N
0
N
M
q:::
CD
'i"
CD
05
CD m
-0
.,.... :>
V'
'i" .2
.,....~ N
- ~ ,---
"jJ 6
~ Q) -"
E C\l
N 1)
,~ f= D-
.,....
,\,.i '0
(T 1)
x;( E
0 f=
.,....
~
[: ()
~J: 'i"
,---
[t: co r--
0 ~
0
cz::
0 -"
>- C\l
:J:: 1)
CD D-
O
'i"
N
o
o
(Sp) jJounCl
e
.
MODRET
HYDROGRAPH DATA INPUT - SCS UNIT METHOD
Project Name: Belle Aqua Villas II ,0234,25YR,24HR,POS
Rainfall Distribution: SWFWMD (24 hrs) TYPE II FL Modified
Contributing Basin Area 0.34 ac.
SCS Curve Number 90.50
Time of Concentration 15.00 min.
Rainfall Depth 9.00 in.
Shape Factor 256
Percent DCIA 0.00 %
-
e
'i"
N
N
N
0
N
M
<:::
CD ~
t'-
CD.
en
CD Cii
-0
:>
(j)
.c
'i"
.,.-~ N
~
::: :S ~
(j)
.v Q) -'"
:;;: N.~ (\)
QJ
.,.-f- D-
m >;-
:::l 0
V Q)
<1. E
.:J:: i=
ill 0
oJ .,.-
~
0
en
0
LD
0')
-'"
(\)
QJ
CD D-
O
'i"
N
o
o
(sp) jtounC:!
e
e
MODRET
SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas I1,0234,25YR,24HR,POST
HYDROGRAPH RUNOFF DATA USED
UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED
Pond Bottom Area 1,148.00 ft2
Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL 1,091.00 ft3
Pond Length to Width Ratio (LjW) 15.00
Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base 0.00 ft
Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table 2.50 ft
Elevation of Starting Water Level 4.00 ft
Elevation of Pond Bottom 4.00 ft
Is there overflow? y
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis 0.10
Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity 14.00 ftjd
Factor of Safety 2.00
Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity 8.40 ftjd
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis 0.20
Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of PondjExfiltration Trench 1.00
Time Increment During Storm Event 1.00 hrs
Time Increment After Storm Event 6.00 hrs
Total Number of Increments After Storm Event 6.00
Runoff Hydrograph File Name: 234POST.SCS
Time of Peak Runoff: 12.08 hrs
Rate of Peak Runoff: 1.35 cfs
Hydraulic Control Features:
Top Bottom Left Right
Groundwater Control Features - Y IN N N N N
Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Impervious Barrier - Y IN I I i
N N N N I
Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I i
--
.
MODRET
ELEVATION VS OVERFLOW RELATIONSHIP
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas II,0234,25YR,24HR,POST
Structure Type: BROAD CRESTED
Crest Elevation
4.62 ft
Crest Length
Coefficient of Discharge
Weir Flow Exponent
Number of Contractions
Design High Water Level Elevation
11.00 ft
3.31
1.50
0.00
4.70 ft
--
-
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
I
I
I
j,
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas II,0234,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (cfs) (ft3)
00.00 - 1.88 2.500 0.000 *
0.00000
1.88 2.500 0.04507
0.03887
2.88 4.000 0.03268 0.00
0.02649
3.88 4.000 0.02347 I 0.00
0.02045
4.88 4.000 0.01914 0.00
0.01784
5.88 4.000 0.01733 0.00
0.01683
6.88 4.000 0.01693 0.00
0.01704
7.88 4.000 0.01760 0.00
0.01816
8.88 4.093 0.01926 0.00
0.02036
9.88 4.229 0.02252 0.00
0.02467
10.88 4.440 0.02666 0.00
0.02865
11.88 4.653 0.02762 796.15
0.02658
12.88 4.708 0.02486 4,210,70
I 0,02313
13.88 4,660 0.01959 I 5,232.10
I 0.01606
14.88 4,643 0,01530 I 5,674.50
.
-
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas n,0234,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (ds) RATE (cfs) (ft3)
0.01454
15.88 4.638 0.01554 5,973.80
I 0.01658
16.92 4.634 0.01581 6 205.00
0.01506
17.92 4.633 0.01463 6,394.70
0.01419
18.92 4.631 0.01410 6,553.30
0.01401
19.92 4.630 0.01378 6,692.60
0.01355
20.92 4.629 0.01332 6,813.70
0.01310
21.92 4.628 0.01308 6 920.40
0.01307
22.92 4.628 0.01264 7,024.20
0.01222
23.92 4.627 0.01229 7,114.60
0.01235
24.92 4.622 0.01187 7,135.40
0.00900
30.92 4.497 0.00813 7,135.40
0.00727
36.92 4.397 0.00669 7,135.40
0.00612
42.92 4.312 0.00570 7 135.40
0.00529
48.92 4.239 0.00497 7,135.40
.
.
MODRET
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
PROJECT NAME: Belle Aqua Villas II,0234,25YR,24HR,POST
CUMULATIVE WATER INSTANTANEOUS AVERAGE CUMULATIVE
TIME ELEVATION INFILTRATION INFILTRATION OVERFLOW
(hrs) (feet) RATE (cfs) RATE (cfs) (fP)
0.00465
54.92 4.174 0,00440 7,135.40
0.00415
60.92 4.117 7,135.40
I
Maximum Water Elevation: 4.708 feet @ 12.88 hours
* Time increment when there is no runoff
Maximum Infiltration Rate: 2.155 ftjday
Recovery @ > 60.920 hours
--
.
LO
'7
(u) uOI"j8^8I::3 J8"j8M
'7
o
CD
LO
LO
o
LO
LO
'7
o
'7
q::
.,....
LO t'-
0')~'7
~ II
:S is
~
>
..<!2
w
Q)
oE
0') ._
I-
LO
N
'-
<J)
ro
S
x
(1)
:2
o
N
LO
o
LO
:
. . i
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES ,
,
,
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT: Belle Aqua Villas II
PROJECT NO.: 234
.
.
,
,
VOLUME PROVIDED = C.F.
,;
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = NGVD WATER QUALITY AREA (SF) ..-.' S.F. ,
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = NGVD BOTTOM AREA (SF) = 1 S.F.
UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = NGVD
COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT/MIN
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = FT
I
j
SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH I
I
I
il
ELEV. AVG.HEAD INCR HEAD L(AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER AREA FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME i
I
FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. I
I
i
4.62 1,911
1.29 0.16 2.75 0.47 22 0.93 281 303
4.47 1,720
1.14 0.16 2.75 0.41 22 0,82 252 308
4.31 1,530
0.98 0.16 2.75 0.36 22 0.71 222 314
4.16 1,339
0.83 0.16 2.75 0.30 22 0.60 193 323
4.00 1,148
948 i
TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME = C.F. f
I
TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 20.8 HOURS
I
Nonhside
~";.1 '_ - -I .,-,
- i" il
.
.
,,", .
i:, .
,I.
,. !" / ,~'
,<; ':/'~' - "'. '-' "c:'
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 18, 2003
To:
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
I~i,~~~ :,~!
1',J';;:lj~1}o~m~;J~'ig,f :,;~:I
-4
Attn:
Wayne Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: FLD2003-07032/PTL2003-00006
Belle Aqua Villas II - 116 Brightwater Drive
N ES Project # 0234
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
() Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
o Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies
Date
Description
15
15
15
15
Full set of civil & landscape plans 8 sheets
Application and required documentation
Preliminary Plat (1 sheet), application
Elevations and Renderings (provided by
architect)
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this project.
cO~'e, s"lo: ,File 1
,[\ ~t'-"'t."",
,) 'l. ''-,
By: '\~~. ) (I..\\.:~:::-;~ r---:;;
Deora Harris; Proje~!;Administrator
- @. .
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
Nonhside
';'~:;'J () ',. "J ','~
_" " , ,. , (I ('~>;>:';':?,<),:_,
(;:c,>~':r~::t~p(;fi::.'~"./:~' i:/ \:':~'c"(.."'J j:_<'.,. _':.
.
.
.
.
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date:
RECEIVED
July 15, 2003
To: City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner
Reference: Belle Aqua Villas II - 116 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0234
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
(X) Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
o Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies
Date
Description
13
13
1
13
Full set of civil & landscape plans 8 sheets
Application and required documentation
Check for $1,205.00
Preliminary Plat (1 sheet), application & 1 check
for $600.00
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this project.
COPi~T Q:\ (J:j~ I
By: \,. ) \".-..l ({_.. - ._>,(~_ ,__......."
Debra 'Harris, Projed\Administrator~
"-..J
LI
FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
CL WCoverSheet
-
e
....~
I ,';"""
"F /;'.1 .....~' .r' /' ,
. ,
FLD2003-07032
116 BRIGHTW ATER DR
Date Received: 7/16/2003
BELLE AQUA VILLAS II
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
/
.....
. .
j:,..'. '\
Cr.l~C\__~__?:;l.?? ., _'_"~_"'_
,"", ,." ?l: It, ll?~ ..<q2 '_"'_
m
P1.Al"N!NG & DEVELOPMt:NT svC:)
Cll)f OF CI. EARWATER
-
-
ORIGINAL
PL T2003-00006
116 BRIGHTW ATER DR
Date Received: 7/16/2003
BELLE AQUA VILLAS II - PLAT
ZONING DISTRICT: T
LAND USE: RFH
ATLAS PAGE: 276A
r:~c Ijw
PLANNING & DEVELOPMtNT S~C~
CllY OF CLEARWATER
" 3~:z.~
111~\oi" , "..Cf
CL WCoverSheet
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
September 17, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - 116 - 120 Brightwater
Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 16, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to
nine feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to
building), from 20 feet to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and
with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks
for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and
conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, IvLwOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIR!vlATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any
permits, including a detail for the wet standpipe;
4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit( s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance ofthe first certificate of occupancy;
6. That revised landscape plans, including details showing the relationship of the proposed
driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations to ensure proper transitioning and
installation methods to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and the type of
landscaping within the right-of-way, be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits; and
7. That a tree survey (including palms) for the subject site and within 25 feet be submitted prior
to the issuance of any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on October 1,2003 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
I \ivfS5cIPDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases\ Up for the next CDBIBrightwater 116 Belle Aqua Villas 1I\Brightwater 116
Development Order. doc
-
-
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REviEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
September 17, 2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - 116 - 120 Brightwater
Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 16, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to
nine feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to
building), from 20 feet to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and
with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks
for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and
conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the sUlTounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER (w BILLjONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 1\1'-:0 AFFIR/vIATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
e
.
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any
permits, including a detail for the wet standpipe;
4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 ofthe Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance ofthe first certificate of occupancy;
6. That revised landscape plans, including details showing the relationship of the proposed
driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations to ensure proper transitioning and
installation methods to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and the type of
landscaping within the right-of-way, be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits; and
7. That a tree survey (including palms) for the subject site and within 25 feet be submitted prior
to the issuance of any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on October 1,2003 (14 days from the date ofthis Development Order).
e
e
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite!
~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
\ IMS5c\PDSIPlanllillg DepartmentlC D BIFLEX'tPellding cases! Up for the next CDBlBrightwater 116 Belle Aqua Villas 1JIBrightwater 116
Development Order. doc
-
.
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PIANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 12,2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Community Development Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development
approval (FLD2003-07032/PL T2003-00006) to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the
side (east) setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from
10 feet to nine feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet
(to building), from 20 feet to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and
with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
&signed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks
for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots at 116-120
Brightwater Drive.
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.9 feet (to
pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet
to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four
existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for
six lots for property located at 116-120 Brightwater Drive has been scheduled to be reviewed by the
Community Development Board on September 16, 2003.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.rn. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112
South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
~~e~}i~
Senior Planner
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX:1Pending caseslUp jor the next CDBIBrightwater 116 Belle Aqua Villas 111Brightwater 116
BRlAN ]. AUN'0DB~&"(j;;'2MMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Nonhside
.
Ii.
.
.. .
.
o>;',,~1
(::~;;;~:"f:t~f~l~'2:\':~'~:J{:')~I:,~,t~~~~~~~':.'?J ~,~o ~,. ii ,: "~;?,;~,// ,', ):};~<~, ;, ;'::>'(;~')L.~~~ 0
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date: August 21, 2003
To: City of Clearwater-Public Works Administration
100 S. Myrtle Ave
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Attn: D. Scott Rice, P.E., Land Development Engineering Manager
Reference: FLD2003-07032/PTL2003-00006
Belle Aqua Villas II - 116 Brightwater Drive
NES Project # 0234
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) Courier
( ) Pick-up (X) Hand Delivered
(X)Originals
o Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
o Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
(X) Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
o For Your Use ( ) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies Date Description
15 Revised C5.1 for COB (1 sheet)
Comments: Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any
further questions or comments reqardinq this project.
CppiesTo:..
,.,\
File
.., 1 ';/ ......;
'\ ! \ 't;;~\>~'>" (~},. .-'il..~,___"..,j,r"'~""
By:\'7:,,<....~-~.. '.' ""'.. ....:..... . \....,<. ~... ,. ...)
Debra Harris, Project Aq)ninistrator
l .j,
FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
e
e
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
July 23,2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, hlC.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with
reductions of the side (east) setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10
feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2
feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear(north)
setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 11.9 feet (to pools) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35
feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-
way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the
property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots (Case Nos. FLD2003-06032
and PLT2003-00006, 116 Brightwater Drive).
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit
attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east) setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to
building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setbacks from
10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 11.9 feet (to pools) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to
40.33 feet, and to pemlit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining
four existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat
approval for six lots at 116 Brightwater Drive. After a preliminary review of the submitted
documents, staff has determined that the application is complete, but with the following
submissions or revisions necessary:
1. The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation
7.9. With existing elevations at 4.9 on the west side and 5.05 on the east side, and
proposed elevation changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the
building, this means on the east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, i'v1AYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAlvlILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, Cm1MISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
e
e
t
July 23, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
Are the edges of the driveways on the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross
sections at these locations.
2. Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is
2.2 feet between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.4 feet grade
differential on the west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally
constructed.
3. Provide a cross section through the proposed new retention pond. Retention
basinlunderdrain detail (1) on Sheet C6.1 does not match retention basin design on Sheet
C4.1. Revise/ make consistent.
4. General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site
design. If not used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match
proposed site design.
5. Provide a cross-section of existing and proposed conditions on the side of the building
(east or west).
6. Denote on Sheets C2.1 and/or C3.1 if there are any exiting trees on-site and on adjacent
property within 25 feet and whether they are to be removed or preserved.
7. Since this development is being subdivided/resubdivided, Section 3-1908.A states that
"The city may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-
way be relocated and/or placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is
redeveloped." Also noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a
subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be underground
unless such undergrounding is not practicable." Existing development along Brightwater
Drive is served by aboveground utilities. With the transformation of Brightwater Drive,
these aboveground utilities need to be placed underground. Address on Sheets C2.1 and
C5.1.
8. Waterfront visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The
triangle is a 45 degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on
the water and along the side property line. Revise and show on Sheets C3.1 and L1.1.
9. Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in elevation from
livable area to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations,
including waterfront visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
10. Building Code requires an 18- foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
11. Revise Sheet C1.1 for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is
proposed and discussed in the narrative. Also indicate proposed rear setback to building
of 16.2 feet. Revise proposed side (east) setback from 6.2-8.3 to 5.2-8.3 feet. Revise
proposed side (west) setback from 5.0-8.2 to 6.2-8.2 feet.
12. Dimension building on Sheet C3.1 and on Sheets E-l and E-2. Unclear where rear wall
of building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
13. Show on Sheet ELEV the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof) from the
required FFE (base flood elevation). Revise ground floor elevation to 11.0 feet.
-
.
July 23, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
14. Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheet ELEV is
necessary. There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be
muted by any landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on
the front and rear elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as
part of the cornice, molding underneath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions
of wall, quoins and like architectural elements. Architectural elements on side elevations
should be consistent with and complement front and rear elevations. Concern: Elevations
provided by Douglas W. Lowe, P.E. look extremely similar to those provided for project
at 125 Brightwater Drive, provided by Donoghue Wood & Associates Inc. Architects.
Building plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
15. Revise Sheet C1.1 under "usage" to provide the correct square footage of each unit (not
1,020 square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 17.7 dwelling units per acre.
16. Provide the proposed color of all building and architectural elements. Provide color
samples. Provide color rendering of building.
17. On the Preliminary Plat Sheet C 1.1 A, provide the existing legal description of the subj ect
property.
18. Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet C 1.1 and Sheet C3.1 to indicate the proposed side
setback to pavement (believed to be 9.5 feet). Revise narrative to ensure proposed
setbacks discussed match the site plan submitted.
19. The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing docks, but doesn't mention the number
of existing slips. Site inspection reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these
existing boats be removed? By when? Please address existing versus proposed
circumstances with the dock/slips.
20. The narrative should address the existing setbacks and scale/bulk of the existing
development (at one-story) in contrast to the proposed attached dwellings and its scale
and bulk (at essentially four stories), as well as its context in relation to adjacent
development (existing or proposed) and that along Brightwater Drive.
21. Comment: Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway
configurations, proposed setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for
meaningful landscaping. There is little landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the
building due to proposed site characteristics (only a hedge proposed along sides).
22. Comment: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided
through garage parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even
temporarily) outside the garage within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with
these proposed townhomes. Different than single-family detached dwellings where on-
street parking by guests is possible, the site design of these attached dwellings
(townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street parking by guests unless
driveways are blocked.
23. Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet.
Provide justification as part of narrative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-
to- four stories over parking). Revise Sheet C 1.1 to indicate real proposed height (above
base flood elevation of 11.0 feet).
e
e
July 23, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 4
25. Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This
site is indicated at 1,439 square feet, yet the project at 125 Brightwater Drive (which is
extremely similar) is indicated at 1,207 square feet, or larger by 232 square feet. One or
both projects appear wrong. Revise.
26. Provide on Sheet C 1.1 the proposed and required parking lot interior landscaping (square
footage and percentage of the paved vehicular use area).
27. Land area is too light to adequately locate the subject "project site" on the location map
on Sheet C 1.1. Either darken or provide location map similar to that for 125 Brightwater
Drive.
28. Unclear why only a four-foot wide sidewalk is proposed within the right-of-way while
125 Brightwater Drive has a five-foot wide sidewalk proposed. Make consistent.
29. Indicate on Sheet Ll.l what is proposed for landscaping within the right-of-way between
the sidewalk and curb.
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by
noon on August 18, 2003 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on August 14,
2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate
time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any
questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
*Make us your favorite!
Sincerely,
f!:;~ /15, Itc~
Senior Planner
\ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next DRCIBrightwater 116 Belle Aqua Villas II1Brightwater 116
Complete Letter 7.23.03.doc
--
.
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
September 16, 2003
FLD2003-07032/PL T2003-00006
D4
ORIGINAL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNERS:
Gary and Mary A. Jernigan
APPLICANT:
Anthony Menna
REPRESENTATIVE:
Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
LOCATION:
116 - 120 Brightwater Drive
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with
reductions of the side ( east) setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to
building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and
from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear
(north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet
to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk)
and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet,
and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-
of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing
boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and
Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.34 acres; 14,775 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
126 feet of width along Brightwater Drive by 120 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Overnight accommodations
Attached townhome dwellings
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - Page I
.
.
PLAN CATEGORY:
RFH, Resort Facilities High Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
T, Tourist District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Water
West: Overnight accommodation uses
East: Attached dwellings (townhomes - approved by CDB and
soon to be constructed)
South: Overnight accommodation uses
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses dominate
Brightwater Drive.
ANALYSIS:
The almost square site is 0.34 acres located on the north side of Brightwater Drive,
approximately 300 feet east of Harnden Drive. It is located along a highly developed area within
Clearwater Beach and has frontage along Clearwater Bay. The site is located within the Small
Motel District of Beach By Design, which provides for the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive
with townhomes and timeshares between two and four stories above parking.
The proposal includes constructing a six-unit, four-story townhome building. The building will
contain four floors of living area above base flood elevation, with the two-car garage on the
ground-level. Each unit will be approximately 3,315 square feet in area. The parking within the
building will include two garage spaces per unit. Each unit will have a singlewide driveway (10
feet wide). The design requires that cars back out into the right-of-way to exit the site. The
Community Development Code prohibits "back out" parking for any uses other than detached
dwellings. The driveway length will pemlit a vehicle to completely "back out" of the garage,
thus eliminating the garage walls as a potential view obstruction of the sidewalk and street. The
development will operate as, and have the characteristics of, single-family detached homes,
including the individual garages. The site is located on Brightwater Drive, which is a cul-de-sac
street approximately 1,700 in length and generally used only by persons with a destination on the
street. From a traffic standpoint, this concept of "back out" parking for townhomes may be
acceptable on a low volume cul-de-sac street such as this. It should not be considered, however,
as a precedent for deviation from the Code provision of restricting "back out" movement into the
right-of-way for single-family residential uses only, and will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
The request is to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east) setbacks from 10
feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side
(west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.9
feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building
height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PL T2003-00006 - Page 2
-
-
right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C. The reductions in side setback is a function of the unit width of 17' -8", which
is generally a standard unit width. The reduction in the rear setback to 16.2 feet for the building
is actually to a raised pool deck area. The reduction in the rear setback to 13.9 feet is to the
individual "plunge" pools. The actual building's southeast comer is approximately 27 feet from
the rear property line, which exceeds the minimum setback of 20 feet. The rear setback reduction
is otherwise to provide pedestrian access to the water and existing docks. The increase in
building height is still in compliance with Beach by Design, which allows townhomes two- to
four-stories in height.
The Italian villa-style architecture of the buildings will include ground floor copper beech-color
stucco with a faux millet (beige) wall color stucco above the ground floor, and alabaster (off-
white) banding, cornices, top rail/balusters and window/door frames. Both the front and rear
elevations are provided with a number of windows. The building will also be articulated with
unit entries recessed from the front fa9ade, accessed from the ground/first floor by individual
stairs with a small third-floor balcony above. On the rear of the building, units will be provided
with a balcony on the second floor and a "roof-top" deck on the fourth floor.
The landscape plan meets Code requirements, utilizing a variety of a colorful groundcover
(including gold mound and purple trailing lantana and emerald blanket), shrubs (including
hibiscus, plumbago and cocoplum) and trees (including washingtonia palms, queen palm,
paurotis palm and silver buttonwood). Additional details showing the relationship of the
proposed driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations will be necessary prior to the
issuance of any permits to ensure proper transitioning and installation methods. A tree survey of
all trees (including palms) on this site and within 25 feet of the subj ect property will need to be
submitted prior to the issuance of any permits.
Solid waste will be removed via black barrel service for each unit. All required Parks and
Recreation fees will be required to be paid prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
applicant will be selling the units fee simple, which includes land, and will record a Final Plat
prior to the issuance of building permits. With this proposal, the two existing docks and four
boat slips (presently leased to non-resident boat owners) will be retained. The applicant proposes
to discontinue the leases prior to construction of the townhomes. Use of the docks and slips
should be for residents and their guests only and not sub-leased. A detail of the fire standpipe
riser adjacent to the boat slips/dock will be necessary prior to the issuance of any permits for this
project. Proposed utility facilities (electric and communication lines) on-site and existing
aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way will be required to be placed
underground, or provisions made for placing the utilities underground (including interim
construction details to be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy)
within timeframes acceptable to the City.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 _ Page 3
e
e
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-801.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 30 dwelling units per 17 overnight six dwelling Yes
acre (10 units)/ 40 accommodation units (17.69
overnight units dwelling units
accommodation per acre)
units per acres (13
units)
IMPERVIOUS 0.95 0.75 0.74 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 14,775 square 14,775 square Yes
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH N/A 126 feet 126 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT N/A South: 10 feet South: 20.1 feet Yes
SETBACK (to building); (to building)
zero feet (to
pavement)
REAR N/A North: 20 feet North: 27 feet (to No - reductions
SETBACK (to building); building); 16.2 requested
zero feet (to feet (to pool
deck) deck); 13.9 feet
(to pool); zero
feet (to
boardwalk)
SIDE N/A East: 5.1 feet (to East: 5.2 feet (to No - reductions
SETBACK building); zero building); 9.6 requested
feet (to feet (to
pavement) pavement)
West: three feet West: 6.2 feet (to
(to building); building); nine
zero feet (to feet (to
pavement) pavement)
HEIGHT N/A 10 feet 40.33 feet No - increase
maximum requested
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 _ Page 4
e
e
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
PARKING Determined by 12 spaces 12 spaces (two Yes
SPACES the Community per dwelling
minimum Development unit)
Director based
on the specific I
use and/or ITE
Manual standards
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE IN FILL REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS IN THE TOURIST DISTRICT (Section 2-803 (B)):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development
standards.
The subject property is presently developed with overnight accommodation uses. The
proposal includes the redevelopment of the site with attached dwellings (townhomes).
The applicant desires to develop in an emerging, residential neighborhood with direct
access to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf. The subject site is located within the "Small
Motel District" as identified in Beach by Design, which anticipates the redevelopment of
Brightwater Drive with residential uses and timeshares.
The applicant will provide mid-level, luxury townhomes compatible with Beach by
Design. A minimum of six townhomes of the size proposed is needed to make this
project financially feasible. The applicant desires a building residential in character. The
requested setback reductions and "back out" parking make the site more marketable and
usable resulting in a building consistent with Beach by Design. All surrounding properties
along Brightwater Drive currently have "back out" parking into the right-of-way. The
majority of those existing parking spaces for the surrounding properties are located within
the right-of-way. While the proposed parking for the townhomes will be within the
garages, vehicles will be able to park outside the garage without extending into the right-
of-way or over the public sidewalk.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
The proposed residential townhomes will help stabilize and likely enhance property
values in the area. The current assessed valuation of the site is $695,000. With the
redevelopment proposal, the assessed valuation is projected at $3,000,000. This increase
in property value is expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - Page 5
-
e
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The City of Clearwater generally permits attached dwellings and specifically within the
Tourist District. The request is being processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project due to the proposed reduction in setbacks and the proposed "back out" parking.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Overnight accommodation uses generally presently dominate Brightwater Drive and are
located on the properties to the west and south. Brightwater Drive is being redeveloped
with attached dwellings, either in the form of townhomes or condominium flats. The
property to the east has been approved for nine townhomes with similar setbacks
proposed for the subject property. Within close proximity to the subject property are
three additional projects either on this same or a future CDB agenda also for townhomes.
Across the water to the north are single-family dwellings (zoned LMDR). The site is
located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which recommends the
redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and four stories above
parking. The proposal is to construct a six-unit, four-story attached dwelling building.
The building will contain four floors of living area above base flood elevation, with the
two-car garage on the ground-level. The proposal will aid in the revitalization of the
Brightwater Drive and Clearwater Beach as a whole. This location provides an
opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater that is currently undergoing renewed
investment and redevelopment.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The location of the site, in relation to Clearwater Harbor and the Gulf of Mexico, makes it
uniquely and ideally suited for the proposed attached dwelling development. The
applicant desires to locate a multi-family development with a single-family character
along waterfront property within an emerging, residential neighborhood. Properties with
these characteristics are limited within the City. The developer is also eager to construct
a project consistent with and encouraged by Beach by Design and is proposing a similar
project at 125 Brightwater Drive (on this same CDB agenda).
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The Italian villa-style architecture and landscape design will
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - Page 6
--
.
complement other similar projects approved along Brightwater Drive. It may further
influence similar redevelopment efforts in the area.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
The proposed development will play a role in the continuing positive, redevelopment
changes of Clearwater Beach. The City will benefit by having a revitalized site and
buildings. The site is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design, which
recommends the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and
four stories above required parking. The City will benefit by having an attractive building
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed building and landscape enhancements will
significantly improve the site. The proposal incorporates well-articulated, unified
elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will visually enhance the immediate area through the
construction of an attractive residential development. The proposed project reflects the
City's vision of a revitalized Clearwater Beach and is consistent with Beach by Design.
The site is generally unmarketable and unusable without the requested allowance to
permit "back out" parking for attached dwellings and the requested side and rear setback
reductions.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Adequate parking will be provided on-site. The proposal, as part of a Flexible
Development for attached dwellings, would require 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or nine
spaces. The proposal includes two garage spaces per dwelling unit or 12 spaces.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3 (Beach by Design).
The proposed Italian villa architecture will be aesthetically pleasing, blending with other
similar projects to along Brightwater Drive. The proposed landscaping will lend in
differentiating Clearwater Beach from other beach areas. The residential design of the
proposed project will help to create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" along
Brightwater Drive.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PL T2003-00006 - Page 7
e
e
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with modest one and two-story multi -family dwellings and
overnight accommodations. This proposal includes luxury, attached dwellings utilizing
the existing boat slips and two docks as an amenity. It will provide another positive
redevelopment example for the area along Brightwater Drive. The development complies
with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Tourist District. The site
is located within the Small Motel District of Beach By Design. Beach By Design includes
the redevelopment of Brightwater Drive with townhomes between two and four stories
above required parking. The proposal is consistent and in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of the adjacent properties and with Beach by Design.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned Tourist District and the surrounding area is characterized by overnight
accommodation and multi-family dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed
development will be in compliance with that zoning classification. The development
complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Tourist District.
The proposal is consistent with Beach By Design and with previously approved or
submitted residential projects with townhomes or condominium flats along Brightwater
Drive and encourage the like-redevelopment of other sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood, is permitted in the Tourist District and is encouraged Beach By Design.
The proposal includes six owner-occupied, attached dwelling (townhome) units with
landscaping and parking spaces meeting Code requirements, utilizing the existing boat
slips and docks.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposal includes developing the site with six attached dwellings (townhomes)
replacing the existing overnight accommodation uses. Vehicle trip generation should
decrease over the former use with this proposal, will not have any significant, negative
impact on affected intersections or roadways and with no reduction in level of service
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - Page 8
e
e
(LOS) on Brightwater Drive. The building is designed with a front setback of 20.1 feet
between the garage door and the proposed public sidewalk within the right-of-way,
permitting a vehicle to completely and safely "back out" of the garage. From a traffic
standpoint, the concept of "back out" parking may be acceptable on a low volume cul-de-
sac such as this. It should not be considered a precedent for deviation from the Code
provision of permitting "back out" movement into the right-of-way for single-family
detached dwellings only.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-
designed landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes constructing a new building with attractive architecture and well-
designed landscaping. An excess of parking will be provided. The level of service on
Brightwater Drive will not be degraded. Black barrels for trash will service the site,
which will be stored in the garages on non-trash pickup days.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review ,Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
August 14, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east) setbacks
from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement), reductions ofthe
side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to nine feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20
feet to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of
building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by
the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots for the site at 116 - 120
Brightwater Drive, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - Page 9
-
.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be pennitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any
permits, including a detail for the wet standpipe;
4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy;
6. That revised landscape plans, including details showing the relationship of the proposed
driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations to ensure proper transitioning and
installation methods to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and the type of
landscaping within the right-of-way, be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits; and
7. That a tree survey (including palms) for the subject site and within 25 feet be submitted prior
to the issuance of any permits.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
~
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
I IMS5clPDSIPlallnillg DepartmelltlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the /lext CDBlBrighllvater 116 Belle Aqua Villas 1J\Briglztwater 1 J 6
Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - Page 10
of) ~
g >l<
C"l Of)
;n '"
C"l C"l
00 Of)
C"l
eJl~
.5 tf'l ~
..... 0 C
"-1t--.v
..... 0 ....
~ I W
>>~~
..... 0 3:
.S: 8 ....
~ ~ J:
u r~. C)
~ .... 02
Q)'+t:al
"-1 ... CD
~ "".....
u ~.....
u
~:~
~~t
-0
III
Q>
....
o
Z
"0
Q>
~~
S
of)
g~
s~
---
00
~~
III Z
is 0
~
N
Q>
....
~
~
....
Q>
....
~
~
:::.:::
;:;
.S
....
ro
.;l
P-
o.
== ~
-3 ~
'f j ~
~ !:l'~
Q> <1) <1)
~ s ~
~~
....
00
o
o
~
g
~
-
i{j~~ g ~~.~ ~ ~
bh ~ ~J) '5 '+=< 0.17J '"
.~ <1) ~ ~ [ E ~ ~ ~ 15 ~ Q
t; ..0 <5 ?o Z '0 ::::.;d iJ ~ ~ H ~
f]~l ~ ~ ~~~ ~ J j~!~
:!!j .:: ::: 6 U 0 '"d '" 6 .$2, 'Cl is.. ~ iI:5 ,,.,
~oj<1)O 00~QtJ<1)~ <1) ~~ZZ
~~~~ ~....0.5~~..c:::.... ~Q~ ~,,.,<1)-
-.~~~ .gH6~6~~ ~~~ HZ..o~
.s~._.,.., HOO~H@'"d ~~~ ~_g~
..c::: _ <1) U . 0..;:::: 0 I-< <1) >-'-<? ~ > ~
=U'"d~~~o.HO~='@ S~S ~~j~
~ E @ .;g i7i '"d ..c::: ~ ~'8 0. = ~:.c tl ::;) B ':
~'" ~~""@~~.;d6E ~O= '"d~o.i{j~
.S .g ~ ~ J, ~ 0..i:J f-=< tj $1 s .s z I: E ~ &l .s z
~a~~.~~]'Cl~~;~ 6~~ ~]]~8
'"d~~8~]~.~<1)'"d ~~~-<R~'"do~~~
@{Jo~CI)o=~O<1) <1)1-< ~..c:::I-<=01i5;>Q
~ ~.=~~.r~.euZ..c:::<1)~~'"dQ<1)~o"'-<1)u
_ ~ '" '" ~ ~. 0 - ..c::: ro CI) <1) !:::l CI) U = <1) '"
0.8 0 ~ ;-' '5 "8 1; [5 - &l 15 - ~ ;;: 'S ~ ~ ;;: &l E 2: c.8
'" i{j ~ ~ <;= U ..0 ";) ~.;; ~ @< 0. ~ 0" > ro ~ ro .- ~ .s H
~ ~=~bh_ro'"d]~~~@<~~U~~~~..o'~.g
.~ n~""Ifl~~~"'H~~_,,.,<1)Q"',,.,"'<1)o is..
,n _",<1) ~~-oo- ::>-_Vo. oVo~o'"
= -,..,_<1)C 0- - ~7.-<1)-Z-0-'"d<1)
<1) .i:J.= Z; ..c::: 5. 4:: _ '"d -: -~.o . ~ 0. iJ '"d - '"d ~ '"d ~ .S'l
~ ."'<1).5~00~~~~0]~~~~~~.S8~~
Q~i~€E~~~Z~-<<1)~-<Q~Z-<ZtJjZB~
= ro ._ .<;= <1) ""..c::: U ~ '"d ~ "" oj
~~~SiJ~Q~~~~~~~Q~'~~Q~'~0~~
'"d
a
iJ
'"d
.~
.~
~
~
o
..c:::
'"
<1)
..0
tJj
;::l
S
'"
?o
~
<1)
~
~
Of)
o
o~
~ I
fjo::l
---
00
Of)
o
~ ~I
C"lCl)
C"l
---
00
~I
~
~
I
VI
~
6
~
~
Z
o
Q
<1)
;:;
o
Z
<1)
;:;
o
Z
of)
o
o
C"l
---
C"l
C"l
---
00
('f)
o
o
C"l
---
C"l
C"l
---
00
Of)
o
o
C"l
---
,.....,
Of)
---
r---
Of)
o
o
C"l
---
~
,.....,
---
r---
('f)
o
o
C"l
---
~
,.....,
---
r---
~
<1)
.;;
<1)
~
gp
~
U
~
4-i
ro
H
f-<
~
<1)
.;;
<1)
~
~
.5
H
<1)
<1)
;:;
'51
;:;
~
o
r---
o
~
Q
.....:1
~
o
00
o
~
~
.....:1
~
<1)
..c:::
-
~
o
~
H
<1) '-'
0:8 '0
~ gbg
i:I:1 .5 'p
o lil-
~ E~
H
~ 00"' t:d
g< go:
OJ .~ c:5
,.D C) .S
i{j S~
. .S '5 S
"t)u....... C);.....
~ ~ ~".9 ;.@.@
O(/)t~ +->0...
otJ[jjg ~('f)
81;u- -~
J,u~~ '~&l
o "9 0 ~ >. ~ ._
oil:5iG'~'5S6:i
[:jz ~;::l o.-~
~~s~2~~
o-'-CI)("o.l p"0f)"1"
.
g"
',p
P..
li
i{j
Q
"8
~
.::l
,..,
6
.'@
U
~
B
-
oj
P.
H
~
~
is
:~
u
-<
~
o
('f)
o
~~
~ ~I
---
r---
<Xl
~
o
<1)
~
0-.
<1)
;:;
o
Z
Of)
o
o
C"l
---
~
,.....,
---
r---
.5
'"d
<1)
..c:::
U
ro
p
ro
'"
-
;:;
<1)
s ;:;
s cd
o;i;
~>l<
'"
'1"
C"l
~
~
.....:1
~
" e e ~
or, ::s
0 i-
0 p...
N or, ';;:
---. tn ~
tn "
N N <<:
---. or, ~
00 "
N U
OJ)
=
.....
......
rIJ.
.....
~
>.
......
.....
~
.....
......
I:.J
~
Q)
rIJ.
~
U
~:~
~~~
-0
~
~~
i:l.
~
~
= >>
N 0::: ~ ~
go
t--o:::
crw
g~
03:;
NI-
Sa
~ii:
=It:l:O
Q) (Q
~ .....
co:: .....
U
:::.:::
u
M
o
o
~
'.0
,....,
---.
~
0.
o
~
b1l
,S
t:
= ;j
.:; ,D
..... ~
'E" 0
<J E-<
~ ~ t)
~ ~ ~
.30
....
tn
p~
:~ ~
~ B
~
o[
~
M
o
~~
;n~
N
---.
~
~
~
~
z
o
o
Q)
1=1
o
Z
M
o
o
~
M
~
~
M
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
~
'"
'"
Q)
1=1
Q)
......
Q)
~
o
U
'+-<
o
....
Q)
t:
Q)
.....l
o
M
N
~
o
.....l
~
'"
~
o
',p
~
6
U
a3
r:/)
M
o
~ 01
~~
---.
~
or,
o
~ ~1
g;~
---.
~
~
~I
.....l
~
~
Q)
1=1
o
Z
o
~
::r::
or,
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
~
M
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
~
......
;j
o
"d
~
'@
::s
o
o
"d
u
Q)
~
:>-,
Q)
i:;
;j
r:/)
Q)
Q)
....
~
00
,....,
o
~
o
.....l
~
"""
"""
N
~
o
.....l
~
M
g~
s~
---.
00
~
~
~
z
o
o
Q)
1=1
o
Z
M
o
o
~
,....,
M
---.
~
or,
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
~
"d
Q)
......
oj
Q)
....
u
g.
::s
o
M
,....,
~
o
.....l
~
M
o
~~
,....,~
---.
00
~
~
~
z
o
o
o
~
::r::
M
o
o
~
'.0
,....,
---.
~
or,
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
~
1=1
,S
......
oj
"5
u
<il
U
Q)
b1l
oj
1=1"d
"a 0
.... Q)
O~
'.0
o
~
o
.....l
~
M
o
~ 01
~~
---.
~
o
~
::r::
M
o
o
N
---.
\Q
,....,
---.
r:--
......
u
oj
S-
>-<
u
S
oj
~
;q",
.... Q)
Q) Q)
>~
tn
,....,
o
~
o
.....l
~
~
;z:
M
g~
S~
---.
00
~
~
~
z
o
o
Q)
1=1
o
Z
M
o
o
N
---.
,....,
---.
00
M
o
o
N
---.
\Q
,....,
---.
r:--
'"
~
o
'-I"
:.0
~
o
u
a3
r:/)
or,
o
~~
0; ~I
,....,
---.
00
~
~1
~
z
o
o
Q)
1=1
o
Z
M
o
o
N
---.
0\
,....,
---.
00
or,
o
o
N
---.
0\
N
---.
r:--
or,
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
r:--
J
M
o
or:/)
~~
O\~
,....,
---.
00
r:/)
I:il
~
r:/)
I:il
~
~
z
o
o
Q)
::1
o
Z
or,
o
o
N
---.
0\
,....,
---.
00
M
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
r:--
r:/)
b
f:::
Q
6
u
ffi
r:/)
M
o
~ ~[
~o
---.
r:--
~I
o
o
.....l
o
::r::
00
'+-<
o
N
Q)
~
0..,
Q)
::1
o
Z
M
o
o
~
o
M
---.
r:--
M
o
o
N
---.
'.0
,....,
---.
r:--
~
Q)
'~ ~
Q) Q)
~ '~
Q) Q)
~ u ~
Q) 5 ~
.~ 0 ~ ~
u ~ ~ .~
~ ~ ~ ~
gb "2 .... Q)
Il) cd -8 -. .~
~,_"r:/) ~
o 0 ~ 0
'.0 tn ,...., N
o 000
o 000
o 0 0 0
.....l .....l .....l .....l
~ ~ ~ ~
(<) ::;s - . ~
0
0 P-< is
N (<) 'S:
---- <n .'"
<n Q
N N -<
---- of) 1A
00 oj
N U
'il
~~
8'
(<)
g~
~~
~CI
----
t--
eIJN
.s ~ 0::
...... 00
r:l:J.t--rv
.... 0 ....
~ I W
>.~~
...... 0 ::
.> Q ~
:+:: ....:l ::I:
~ r~. C)
< ~ ii:
Q)=+t::CO
r:I:J. Q) CD
~ rJ'.l....
U U....
(<)
o
00
N ~
;::::;f-;
----
00
o
~
f-;
r..il
Z
o
CI
(1)
Q
o
Z
(<)
o
o
N
----
,....,
----
00
(<)
o
~~
;n~
N
----
t--
~
~
r..il
Z
o
CI
(1)
Q
o
Z
(<)
o
o
N
----
00
,....,
----
t--
r()
o
~ u5
c::: 13
g ~
U C,)
p::; 0
CI Z
r()
o
~~
;n~
N
----
t--
~
~
r..il
Z
o
CI
(1)
Q
o
Z
r()
o
o
N
----
'<t
,....,
----
00
r()
g~
S~
----
00
~
~
r..il
Z
o
CI
(1)
Q
o
Z
of)
o
o
N
----
,....,
----
00
r()
o
~~
;n~
N
----
t--
~I
r..il
6
CI
00
'-H
o
r()
(1)
~
P-<
~
o
Z
(<)
o
o
N
----
1.0
,....,
----
t--
(<) (<) (<) (<) r()
- 0 0 0 0 0
.. 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ N N N N
---- ---- ---- ----
~ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
,...., ,...., ,...., ,...., ,....,
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
t-- t-- t-- t-- t--
~ ~ "'C
(1) (1)
(1) .:::
(1) .;; s
:::.::: .;; (1)
u (1) (1) ~ C,)
~ (1)
~:~ c: ~ cI8 ~ H
.s C,) (1) Q
.... (1) .... (1) (1) .S
0- U'J .;;
~~~ ~ oj .... ~
.C ~ .- (1) ....
U'J CI oj
... cI8 :> ~ .~
'"
... ~ :8 u ~ P..
~ (1)
oj 0 .... ~ 0..
P-< ifJ U3 CI U -<r:
0 0 0 0 1.0 0
-0 ~ (<) '<t '<t '<t ,...., ,....,
:~ 0 0 ,...., 0 0 0
I- CI CI -<r: -<r: CI -<r:
t: 9 CI CI CI CI CI
~ .....1 .....1 .....1 .....1 .....1
f:I" f:I" f:I" f:I" f:I" f:I"
or. ::E
g ~
C'-l rr.
;n '"
C'-l C'-l
;0 r()
C'-l
.....
ro ~
~ ~ 13 Q) t) .gf 0'. ~
.C .0 Vl .:: ~ <l) ..:!l ~
..c~[;':: Q)ca
.~ iG 0 ~ 11 i:l ::: 0
:::--;;;;:; roQ)b1)'::
"" l--'-; ~ ~ I
~^ ~ll"2 g. ~ ~ .S r')
;:: .~ ": i5.. ~ ca .fj ~
0".-< tJ.) ~..r:; +-> ~ ~
5 6J il 0 ~ .5 Vl 00
.~ ...c +-> ~ 0 [):-Q '::
~ ~ ~.B ;g ~ : .~
OJ ~1;jg:JQ)~tt!
.::0\"+='1:'--8"0:::0
~~ 5.n] ~1i~
;.g;g .8 .....00..... ~
~ g;.nln Sf<8 gj-E
[Q)"o.n'o 6 ~ tt!
~~~j]~~B
Q) Q) "0 Q)..... 0 .p
ia b1).fj) ~ ..c !!! Vl &l
ro..... b1)......... >0
i{J~o~l'd1;jOro~
b1) ~ 0> ..c 0\ .~ ::: Vl
~ Q) "" o. Q) 0
ttl ..c Q) I': I:'-- ~.~ tJ
b1} ~ ~ .9 B ~ ~ tJ.)
Q)"O.::.....b1).....Q)"O
t: "en 0 g; .:: ~..c .;:;:
~ ~ . '5 0; Cl) '0 -d ~ 2
0""'" OJ b1).O; 00..
~~
;n~
C'-l
----
00
.....,
Q)
8
o
?
.....
o
....
Q)
f-:
.8
e
0; H ~ L~ ~1I ! if. H". "" ~ g ~ ~ :
i7l ~..3 .::.fj) :.e'.~"O':: "0 6:j.n ::: rr..:: :g.n.;::; r') c ~ tt!
~"E Vl "0....."0 8 ~ Q) ;:::; .;:;: tt! ~ € 6 .~ 0 ] ~ ~ .~ t :::
0~~~~0Q) ~>oro8 :.ei:l::: ~.;:;:~~~~ ~ ~<8Q)
~c.l:<~~~ro~~ ~ l'd~~ .n ~&~.~_gD_"Ooo E ..c
.....~""'"i7l~~op, <l)rr.Q)~C'-l ~~ge~]cai5..Vl~<l)'-"" o~.....
~+->~b~~~8 ~~~~~ ~.~~~.~@~~:o~~ o~8
oo~roQ)Q)5.....p, p,NQ)C'-l'-"" ~~~~llro~.::>13~.n oroQ)
~ ;;" "0 .S S , 1l~"5 e ;;0 [) .S""8 ~......C.......... Q) ._8 Vl.C.~ ~ U I': 8:l .S
::: .;::; l'd ~ I _ Vl tt! 0, ,-""..c ..c > .;:;: ~.o 5 g 2:0 ...... Q ~ 0 "0 !'-' 5b-
Q)BQ)~80;:;E "O.-:...4::.~"'" ;;:;Eii..co .::~[)>=:.....@ ttl()€
.~ ~ ~ ro ;;::; ~ 0 0 @ ~ .~ ::: ~ .n >0 ;:; ::: ..:!l s .il ] tt! <8 13 ~ "0 Q)
~ ~ ~.': ~ 8:l ~ ~ .Sf ~ 0 ~ e ~.[1 ~] ~ .0 ~ g ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~
..c ('oj ro e..c .s ."!'! c: ..... g. 0 ..... Q) '+=' 0 =. .:: ..... 5b b1) t:: ~.r:J "" -
4:: N ~ ~ .r::J (/] d Q) >< ~ 0 ....."0 .2 ~ ..:: 5b 13 :ll."!'! ..... .C Q):B () i{J .~ ~
o Vl4:: 2 b1).b1)"O,-..Q) ~~ p,!!! .n= ~..... 0,0"0 Q)co-:5 () bll~.....
Q)_.-o.;().Sfj)Q)~~D.............. .~.....VlQ)O"O-"Obll_""'..c b1)C
0, ~-"OQ)~ o'-""ttl'::O ~ro.~"O~.....gl': S(/]~Sl':~
o~""'~~ia"O.;:;: .::b1) Q)~ .......c......::~ro-';:;I':~ .::~ roO
~.::5Vli7lb1)Q)Q) 08~U.~D 5.....a;:;iG..c~~~::s]0::sEtc.l:<
~~.....:~c.l:<~5~~~.....~~ ~~~Si{Jg"O"O~~;:; -'Vl ~ ~
~~~.B:::~~.S~~~];~~~~i~].~~~;~]i~~]~]
"0 "0 J'j S C "0 ::: , Vl Q) Q) ....., Q) --<;.:: 0, Q) 0, b1) Q) > "0 .p .- ~
1':0'.~~~-6~.~~8~~~]~.~~~~~~2.S]i~0~].~;g~
~1l~~g58~~~ro013S~~~~"O~Vl~]"O>"O~.r::J8"E.~S
~E~~'~:~kn_.~~,~~.~~'~,~~oE~B~~~]~~~~B~.2'0;:;:b1)
. Q)~>o.....~~~~-~.....o ~~e"O~""'.-OhOO..cOQ)-'::
(5 1':00 ~ ~ ~ -:S 1'1 i=: ~ ..;:;: Vl .:: t; 0 .:: Cll ~ ;.:: 0 Vl 5b 2' 5b..... 5b Q) [) ..... .C
u ~~_ ~'~~aO~50~~g00~~~~~_V~,~~~~~~~~
"0 U.~ 0,0 ~ So (.) .n "0 .- p:: ..... 0 i{J 73 a3 Vi ..;::; > is - - Q) i7l > > Q) ..... ~ ~ gj
8:l ..... - Q)Q)~.I': .()~~ .~~_Q)1;j~].RO.C"OQ)~OQ)
I':N"O i5..:.e</:::<<i ia-:5"O""," Oln.):;::: ,'-O(/] ro ~-:5-E;:; ;:;~.gQ 5 8~u S
.~~
~
~
.S:
.p
u
..,;
1A
oj
u
~ ("'l
= 0::
.... ~ c
... 0
rIJ t"-- 0::
.... 0
~ I W
~ ~
>. 0 00
... 0 3: ~
.... ("'l 0
> 9 I- ""'"
.... J: Q)
... C) ~
~
< ~ ii:: 0..
~ =l:I: OJ
rIJ ~ CD
~ III .....
U eo: ..... "c::I Q)
U '0 ;:::;
= 0
Z
rr.
0
0
C'-l
----
rr.
C'-l
----
I:'--
rr.
o
.. 0
..... C'-l
~ ----
~ ~
----
I:'--
::.:: :::
u
~:~ c Q)
.~ .;:;:
.... v
~~[ Q., p::;
.;::
... b1)
'" .~
..
~
0
N
C'-l
-0 C ......
:~ 0
t- o
..... 9
...
-<
~
or, ~
g p-<
N r')
Vi <n
N N
"00 r')
N
Q) g ~ . 0 "0 0 - bJl tIlQ) 2. "0 cQ) %~" Q) 1
r') ~ ~C~ ~;~. ~~ ;igtll~~ cD 52' tIlr')
u .s~ i{JQ), oQ)~oo,',~ -'>0- ~~~ ~&1~~~ .~ ]~...6~Q) ~.~~
tIl -0 ;::l8~ Q)..c....~., ~(lJ ;;::p.."OfH-Q)"H -I=<"!j .ill'" "'H
a3 ,~ tIl" C ... f: Q) H +-' ;e r'J S W ~ ~.!l S .5 6:J cD a) til 0 "0 u; 23 Q) i1J [) ."';:; 7 5 "0 2:
..c 1t..g 8 ~ g '" s ~ .S ;;:: \0 0 tIl bJl Q) , "5 "0 p...- Q) 5 0 i:lo ~ ~ "5 r') 0;::
00 ~~i1)l ~&~ ~13.5S~ ~13 ]]8 ~~S&1~~~':::]u];~~ ~~~
I=: ~Q)~o HClI=: ~~o~~ ..c~ bJl~~ H~Q)Q)SO"'V"O ~- <n ~Q)b
o ~ "0 bJl 0 <8 i{J ~ o;::l ;; '" 00 0 S N <8 Q) ~ .s ~ tIl" C) "3 tIl >r.i .~ g;3 ~ ~ '"
j ~o~~i ~.~~ ~~~1j !~ ~]~ ~~i;~~i]~I~~i~ .~~~
tIl 5h..c oDVN tIl"O~~/""'. ;::bJl oD'-'Q) '.pQ)tIlQ)O~"'TItIl >~",tIl ag..eJ
"0 0 ~'" Q)OO~ tiJ;::~~~ "'I=: WQ) ",~o~~tiJaSl=:o~~~.GE o~.E
i ~~~~ =5~ ~;~o~/""'.~~~l&~ ]~fr.~p.."O~~C)j~~~ ~~~
.~ ~~~&1/""'.~[~ ]~~~~i3:0.5i3:fr13= ~~a~B~~~~~~~~~ ~5~
G0bJlQ).~Ei3:~o"O &fr~~]i3:a3~' ....~o ]~~~~~tiJ~C)~~.~~] tIl -
~ ::> e :g Q) c i3: - ~ g 2 a &] ~ ~ t3 ~ ~ ~ g. ~ Q) 15 tIl ~ ~ [1 tIl";"'" ~ [ij ~ p.."O ~ ~Q)"" ~ ~
c.i i3: ..c > o;=:: , g Q) H p.. tIl P "0 tIlo '" _ ~ ~ ~.s -B Q) .~ c:a C) "0 :::= "0 .r;; ~ 0.9 :5 .C ~
I=: , ~;.::: c .;;:: ~ i{J Cl p.. H .- :=; DtIl ~ l=<, 0"" ~ ~ > t!) ~ ~;:: '" ... b "0 I=: ;:: ~ C>;>-. "O.~ r--;
~~ro~~ ~ o'~- _ ,'j ~~ o~~~w~~ro~oQ~~~ ~~~
;..:::: 0) 0 t:: :.::: "r;) 8 I-< Q) '...I tH ~ C) 0 0 ('f') bJ) Ed ~ W 'P Q) ~ ">- S t) ~ ~ .S ~ ~ ~ >. ~ OJ..., ~ ~ ~ ::....:;
~s~.2p..E';; 'a~gtll -~",p..p..oSQ)<n...lSQ) 0 ~Q)"Oo:::="" oDv_v ~o
Q) , ~ ~ 0 ;:: r') ar U I=: . ~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ..g:J:::=:E &1 2 ;s .g 5 5 13 .~ ~ ~ d ~ ~
fr 8 tIl (5 ;' .2 S2 ~ .fl .:2 /""'. u '" S Q) .;; ~ ;::l Q) '-' :B ~ 0 ~ W 13 ~ _ oD ~ 0:- ,::: ,::: ~ a :2 ~ ~ ~
..._tIl.p~_<n"o""~~Q)o' tIlQ)'-'oD~~_Q~ o~oro""o~_~vv~ o....ro Q)O~
p..~ o.~ 0 [) (::l 08 g Q) ~.~ _-<175 .;;Q) ~. ti .I=:Q ~~ .rrlQ) us op :2;::l .-e:B 0 OH .... :::=0 a:; "@Q)o.. 5 ~ f'"\ tIl :; Q) ~
~~ b.!l{i1;j~U.13 tS-;::~ Q) ~ +" I=: ~.... '" ~ 0 - "0 ~c:a S H 0...... g ..c Ef~
.~'-''''Q)Q)"O:::=tIlbJl-_H 'Q) ~~<HtIl_"Oo~o "'Q)~abJl~~I=:~HOp..~~~ 00_
o (lJ [1 - '" tIl I=: -:;::.~ ;::l 0 B 0 13 0 - p.. Q) 0"0
~ ~ "0 .s@ gr ~ ~ ~ .!l B .~ ~ Q) nj ~ r'J ~ d o:S <;::: 5h ~ B ~"& I=: :::= bJl tIl 0"0 0 ~ 13 bJl .~ <8 ~
~-';;Q)Q)~tIl;::l~"'~~>Q)~>.~r')~.SO.~_tIlQ)_~ c~o--I=:Q)I=:'-H-S Q)O
'" ,0 bJl H v - Q) v ~ ~ N 0 - Q) ~ . , ~ s: ~ ~ ~ C:3 ~ .<2 .;:: '" 12 ~ .~ ~ /""'.~ ,;:J p..
0.> co""" H ;:: ;::l ;::l.2 .;::l ~ :::= ;0 ~ '" '" ~,oo,' . Cl ,,.... 00 ..c .C i3: u. :> ~ [; v ~ - ,........ ~ ..... Ea 0
... - _ ~ _ tIl ~ " ,..., 0 _ oD r-, " ,~ -; iH ~ 0 oD"O ..c ~ ~ 0 - ~ 'S 0 ~;::l ...."
o ;; v ~ ..c ~ ;2; c l-"-.( Q) :::: - 0 Q) ca . C'l 'l,..J ...~..,...., N bJ) (1) :::: () 0 ;.... ;.... ~ ~ 5 - .....
Zc:ag~ow.=Q)~;s~8-tIll=:~~B=~~-~~i3:~{i~~~tiJS&-<.~~'tIl~CO ~g?
~
~
;;.,
:~
u
-<
iA
U
,-0
0.>
~~
~.
~
ell N
= 0:::
..... ~ Cl
~ 0
rIJ t"""- o:::
..... 0 w
~ I
~ ~ 00
>. 0 ~
~ 0 ~ 0
..... N <n
> 9 l- t!)
..... J: ~
~ C)
~ ~ 0...
~ 02
~ =It: a:I
rIJ Q) to
~ CIl .....
U ~ .....
U
N
0.>
...
OJ
Q
.....
0.>
...
OJ
Q
::.::::
'-'
~:~ =
Q
;::
~~~ 0-
'C
<.J
'"
0.>
Q
~
-0
..... :~
...
<.J
-<
cC) :::E
g p...,
C"1 r')
;n If)
C"1 C"1
00 ~
("'.l
OJ bJ)C'- 0 - ~ ,~ .~ 'Ho "Q ~e,
~'H ~...... ~~ ~...... ~~ ~~
~.i 1~~]~~~ ~!.~ ]~~~i ~~~~l~~
~~ C)~~~2~bJ)~.~]~ ",' ]~~ S .~p.,::l~~
1a 5 -B,"O oS iA , .~ Vi 00 ~ ~ ~ 'S"2 ~ -B ~"5 'i J3 ~ .i ~
"2~ ~8s~"Or')'R~HDC) ~i~~"O s"O'H;:::'~~
OJ ~ .;; ---- C) C) Q C) p.,.r:: P:; .r:: I.S S .8 82 %l :: Co ,;::: .~
bD ......... 0 t.n ~ ~ l..r) Q) ;..:::: ~ '=+:::l rJ') Q) ~ ........ ~ -......... ~v ........., 'J.I
;::: 0 ~ ~,....; [J p., C"1 ..0 '" ;::: c-. .r:: bJl B 0 :><"0 ...-.: OJ p. "3 S 0 ~
~~ p.,oou~0~~bJl'~5~C',S......:i~ ~p.,V,D~;:::C)
~"O ~~~p.,~~0.;:::B.r:::S~i7le~6"'~~,DB~~~.~.~
~].;; ~~].8~~bJl~]:s~~'B""""Oo& ~~v~oo'~"O
~ - 8 - v 00 ...-.: 5l t: .g 6:J :>-';0, v 5 S .::J 8 '" <.H ';;' '0 2:; -<
~ ~ ~ ~ g. ~ g 5'8'8 'H gf P=l ~ B .;: S ~.~ ;; ~ ~ If) ] B] ~ ~
,o~ a3~~~ ,D......O~~ .~~g.;:::=0C)'",~ &:l,D~~
~~~~.r::n~.~B~~~.~13S~D-'~=bJlS~"O]~~,;:~
0"S..... 00 v '" C);::: C),D ~ :> [5 "2 ~ ~ ~ !1;' ;::: , += c: ...... 't '" ...... .::;
p.,o~ ~'~~~:>Oj.r::c o~o~v~~~~vOj;::: _::l_
~O~ ~-~u~a~~~t::'oo~"O~~'3QObJloC)~0"3
"'d ~ ~o: ~5~ r-< OJ........ ~ ro ~'"d'"'d"'d bl)"'d "Vlfl~ ~'"d:5 U.-C,..D
~<l)o'-';>-,v= u~ ",vC) d)a3-;:::v~~C"1C)~vv;:j.~v
~~~S8.;:~~-~~-B~]~;:::g~~~~~~g~~] .;:
~ 0.. u ~ ~ - p-. Q) Q) Q) ~ -:5 U) 0... I ...G 'R ro'C 1l.) '-.-/ B ~ s.~ ~ ~ 1)
._ 2: 0 r1J ....... 0 -1-' 0 .;:!3...c ;.... 0 U) tj 0 .,.,.,. rn Q) p B S 0 tfJ ;"";::l -'-;d
~ p,,:;2 ~.S ;::::.s ~ 55 ~ ~'.o OJ 0 ~ ~ ~ C)'; '" P".E;':: B p,,'c:';: ~.e;
;:j]2:;If)~]~C)r:>:::o~5C),D~ ~-B~~~o"'~gf.8B~~
~......~~.tP,,~-B ~Ojs55~~~e'H ~~ ~~.~ C)v~ ~
~C)~eC).t:: v~S~"",,~,~~C:1aO& v~ff:s~gf;:j~O~
I ~ '" biJ -B &l .~ ~ ~ 13 c: -c: :3.123 :> ' ;::: ~ 0 ::2 ~ ~ ~ "0 ~ ~ ~ c: g:j ~ S
~~8"5~O;:::~~~~~]~~6:Jgf~]~~~5!]S]~S~'8~U~
~ S p..., t:: .-'::: OJ ..... c: 0\ [5 F-< "0 15.. 2A 'fii ~ F-< ~ .r:: C) ~ bJl F-< i7l ~ ,D :'2 ;:j .~ ~
o -0 If) [) ;:; \0 ~ r-: Q) .~ 00 "t: ~ ~ 'R 03 0\ ~ ::; ~ ~'C 0 ro 0 t1) '8 ~ .S Q) --'
Z ~...-. a::5 ..D ......... ~ ......... .8 ,..D '1:::;l ......... ..D .;::: 'P Cl) '-.-/........ (/j -+-> Q) ro ~ 0-l ~ += ..p ,..n H SSM
~
~ OJ
...Q
C) ~"'='"O :>-'~C) B
-$ "0 '" ,~ v ~ :;:::: ~
" S ;B C) - .~ ~ 1;5 - gf
.S tI) bJl -B ~ 8' g ~ ~ ~ :g
:'2...-.:S~'.o ~bJlp.,E-8
'S ~ .~ ~ '5 ~ ] bil 5 ~ p.,
,D'::V<l) > ;:::......~"~~
"0 V S "'tS;>;::::g;:::::>~ C)
<1) (/j ;..., & ~ I ro ~ ~ .~ ~ ~
~13~ ojg ~-B p"C).r::i5 b
g.~s~os~C)~F-< 0
~ g. 8 gf.~ s e] ~ ~ v
v ~ ~.~ '" ~ "" 1;5 '" ~ 11
..q,,:~~"OQ~bJl 8:50>-
_ ~ d)1f)";:::~p.,v,""~
'H~:;:;&l"'M"""""""':>-;:::'"
o 6 ;=: "0 0 ~ 13 gp 1a .t:: ~ bJl
~ ''; ~ ~ g. '-' -+-> 0 () -0 0.8
-;:::i::~-~~0.E'-''-'''''''
.b 5b:>~ 0 ~~...... ~-B"O!1;'
~ ~ .~ .1;:: ...... :;2 .~ 13 .r:: ;::: 2A ~
':p ~ (l)'- ~ UJ .~ '"d UJ ~ 0
o R ~.~ ~ !2Jl ~ .;; gf....... g.13
......uv u.....~o;=:;;:~.r::
~ ~i ~ gf~@ ~0 C);;~
o ~.~ ~ ~ "0 bJl ~ ~ ~ ~
>- ~ :-a ~ ~ .;: >-. ~ S >-.
~'.g biJE &5~] ~~]
"0 "0 .S ] 8 S.~ ,c;j -B 0>- ,c;j
vv~"""p.,SbJl~ ~~
~~&l'oC)0;:::a)~~a)
p., p.,"O ~ bJl U :g bb'2 t: bb
o 0 ;::: OJ 13 N 8.S ;:j C) .S
a ~~ ~ ..c C'l 0.. (/) o,..n UJ
~
""
:~
t)
-<
1;
'"
u
..,
ell N
= 0:::
..... ~ c
...... 0
rIJ. t-- 0:::
..... 0
~ I W
~ !;;: 00
~ 0 'H
...... 0 3: 0
..... N \0
> 9 I- C)
..... J: ~
...... C)
u p...,
< ~ ~ ~
~
Q) ::J:t: aJ S
rIJ. Q) c.c
e-= '" .....
U ~ .....
u
l"l
..
....
~
Cl
.....
..
......
~
Cl
:::.::::
'-'
~:~ =
.::
Q.
~~~ 'j:;
<.J
~
..
Cl
-0
'-'
.....
8 ;;S
o ~
N Of)
Vi <n
N N
00 rtj
N
eJJ
=
.,.
.....
rI:J
.,.
~
~
.....
.,.
>
.,.
.....
~
<
Q.l
rI:J
~
U
::':::u
~:~
~~i
-0
Q) ~ ~ ~ en t>e ~ S bJ) ^' ~ S2 _ q ~
lfj :;: 'c) '-g 'c E '" ro tl a.i ~ ..c: ~ bJ) ~ >='~.::l
~ ~, .:;'" 0 "d "'Q & bJ)'~ .,..,,~ oj... c ---- 0 k "d
~ 'r() '" a ..... ~ r() ~ lfj t<l 6J "'" ~ "d 0) .R DO OJJ <l.l
;::: 5 52 ~ ~ lfj 0 0 0 0\ lfj _ e<:: ~ 0 ~ tl 1;1 g. '-:" ] oj .~
~.g~ ;:l'bJj 8~ 8"~.~ s bJ)' ~~ :g''€E ~~ ~ 15 ~olfj 0
;:l iif t: ~ 0.:00, a - .;:l .....^ ~ ~ 1:] lfj i:iI . bJ) t:: ~..... ~
"d0~ ~ojo _ .....~Q)o ~<ll <ll C oj~ U ~..c <ll
~~-d 0)0.+;'13 Soj~~!,< .....u..-,..c...-<o:l -~ ... olfj t<l
~&<ll ..cgjO~~ <'::'13'-'<ll~ [tl:S:~...-<<n ~ro ~ ~~~lfj~~~
~~~ ~~~<ll~ 13~<lla'" "dO':s:.....UN ~ bJ) out::~~>:H
oj.~o 00:{J~ "du.~;:l0 @], ~~- 13~ .5 t:: ro-roo~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ;0:: .~] C5 g' g: oj ~ s: 1J ~ [~ ~ .~ gf e- ~ <5 ~ "d
;5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ..8 .~ ~ a'~ E 2; ~ ].& S i? r/J ~ e'fi) ] ~ 'B 1J ~.~ ~ ~
~~lfj oj~~.....O tl'~oj~~ Ro~~13<5 0.0) ~ ~~oEB~~
51J'5 ~ .g'~ ~ ::.~ s'~ ~ ~'8' [ ~ ~ ~ ~ B '':; ~ 22 B ~ 8] '~.g ] ~
,.., "d ^' -"d ~ U '" ;:l lfj b:b"d 0. ^' ~ C' "d C ~ oj 0) > "'0 ,^ ;:l <l.l ....
'w - U.....~ > t::'~'C<l.l..c -oj_oj~_ ~O)~ v.~ lfjgj~~~
.g~.~ 'S~lfji<ll <ll~o:l~"'" <5&~013'~22~~ I'C~'-'-'~]"d~~'~
<ll .g "d 0 ~ v ~ ~. <n .;:l 2 ~ lfj ~ ..... ',p 'Dl :s: - v ~ o.i:ii 0 ~ oj <ll _ V ~
.~ :~ ~ ~ p.. ~ c;j "8 0 0 s:! ] S U 'b;; ~ ..c.;ll ojou ~ ' ~ ~ -E ~:::2 ~ ;; ~ 1J S 0
<ll"d_ .~~00)0 ,P~.....'_^,~ ~ro- E..........ro..c~~~~~.-.....R~
<5.S@ ~~a~~ ~0)~'~8-~~'-VO<ll O):H~'~oj~lfj1Jo"d<ll-.....
(-c 0) 0) . Vl ~..-, :s: 0) g. Vl 0 ,s t:: E ~ ~ 5 ~ 0 ~ lfj ~ .S ~ ~ 0
v" <5.tl a ~ 51J e<:: gj S'l;:l. ~ ,c;j ~ ;:l..... .s:' tZl 9 u ._ U 0 "d [l... ~ ~
~.~ <ll t:: <ll 'fi) ~ rl a 8' ~ ~ ..... ~ "d a .:; 5 ~ r() >= E 13 r;:s: s: fiJ :s g 0 ~
lfj ..-, ;:l v > <ll ~ v :3 0. E ,!U <ll 0 ~ ;3 ~~ OU c:::: 0 .~ :'2 ~ ",;> :i ~ .....^ lfj .s
lfjolfjbJ) <5oClbJ)> ~U<ll'fi)~SQ)-u-b <nv lfj_O ~lfj ~
v~ <ll~ 50 u~~ v "'o'-~""'~C'~~. ~enZ~-<llo ~o.
0. S ~ lfj oj ~ ~ ~ v .fi 'P ~;,; ,~ .fi 'fi) - - '" - 0) '<:t ~ -
.~ 0 .~ OJ .!:J ;.... 0 f3;;....... v ~ ~ ~ 'C :> "'d +-,l ~ ~.~ .p t) {j ~ ~ u:. Q) ~ ~ ~ 5
..c bJ)..-, ... lfj ..c OJ..... ^' <ll ~ U 0 0 <ll @ U > "d ~ E "d "c ~ ~ ro '-' v
'" ~ ~ t:: ~ ~ OJ U o...c ..-, ~"d ~ [i lfj;r; p:: ....."d .<ll 0 a.i >= <C c:::: ~ ,oj - OJ ;:l
i [l ~ :g ~ 0 tl .~::; . ~ ~^ .t: N ~ ..5 ~ : 8' a.~ ~ :: '2 . ~ p.. &3 ~ 5:: ~ 5:: 0'
Z 5b 6 a , ~ ,s 23- 6 1J ::; ~ a ~ 63 ~ ~ ~ ] a 0i ? S C5 ~.~ ~ 03 :::' {i ~ 0i' <5 M' ~
'Q
O,l
~ c6'
8'
~
Of)
o
~ ~I
N
----
DO
<::~
t~
:9
N
~
o
t---
o
I
~
o
o
N
9
~
::t:t:
Q)
'"
eo;
U
O,l
= >.
0:: ~ i:CI
C
0::
w
!;i:
;:
I-
::I:
C>
a:.:
al
CD
....
....
v
q
o
Z
CI
~l
CI
.....:i
o
::r:
f'f1
O,l
~
~
N
O,l
....
oj
~
C()
o
o
N
----
:.::!:
DO
'""'
O,l
....
oj
~
C()
o
o
N
----
\0
-
--
t"-
=
.::
....
i:l.
.;:
...
'"
O,l
~
~
v
.;;
<ll
e<::
bJ)
~
.~
u
'"
"d
q
o:l
.....:i
t-
"T
-
o
Cl
Cl
.....:i
~
l
.S
~
-a
v
E
i7J
~
is
:~
t:
<(
1A
U
,.....;
~
<ll
<5
bJ)
5
~
15 E
S . 8 ~
gfbJ)v~
'i3c~~
:2S"d
~ 'S V1 8
;;:~E~
r/Jo'b&Js
~[l[l~lfj
~:O"dtl~
~ B '8 ~ ~
o bJ) lfj .S ~
U .S ..8 ;g t::
Cl~ro;:l(j)
.....l u o.~ 1.:'
O-ig~6~
'j<,::,~~
8<i,:;~~~
~~~~f3
~..-,~~~
OO..........NM"P
~
~
DO
'-'-'
o
t"-
v
2'Jl
p..
or, ~ <!.l - e
a ~ ~
a p., +-' 1a
N or, .;:: >-. I-< ~
---- If) o <!.l <!.l
If) .~ 0.. :~
N N ~F . t;
---- or, CJJ ~
00 "0 .;; . 5
N e
0 13 .~ "
p.., 5 .S "8 u
vi '.g ~ 51
"0 bJ)~t;::;
5 .~ B 5
0.. vi
I-< ::: .......... 0
<8 5 <!.l :-;::: bJ)
~ '1ij .p ?; .S
.~ ;:l E X! .122
rrl t o u ill
o..;:l ~.gl-<
CJJ'+=1 CJJ .~
~~ ~ bJ) <!.l
e..c
":::"0 '.p +-'
o....p ;:2 .;Q .5
+-' >-. 5 63 r"
@..o ~ <!.l 5
t; >-. o ~ u
o'@ +=' e
~+-,oor,
:::::"0 rooS2
~ <!.l ,sea
~ .;:: :g t .~ ~
"oz ~rotar-
5"0 0.. ~ bJ).;;2
E <!.l :@ ,s .~ 5
E FJ ~ E ~ ~
0"0
a3 5 1l:go5
~ .S ......."Oc(:Q
or,
a ~
a
N
---- ~
.....,
----
00
~ ~
= ~ 0:: ~
..... ~ C
... 0
'" t-- 0::
..... 0
~ I W
~ ~
~ 0 00
... 0 s: <.;...,
..... ~ 0
~ 9 I- 00
..... J: <!.l
...
~ C> ~ ~
< ~ 0:: z p..,
:tI:: aJ 0
Q) Q
'" ~ (0
~ ~ .....
U ~ ..... <!.l <!.l
U C C
0 0
Z Z
or,
a
a
N
----
.....,
----
00
or, or,
,...., a a
~ a a
..... N N
~ ---- ----
~ 'D 'D
....., .....,
---- ----
r--- r---
s: s:
<!.l <!.l
.;; ";;
<!.l <!.l
:::.::: ~ ~
u '"@ .....
~:~ c:: ;.... E
o~ c CJJ
..... <!.l ro
~~[ 0- R ~
oc S
... 0 .....
'" 0
~ .....
~ .~ ~
ro
~ ::r::
N a
-0 .c ;- 0\
u :~ a a
I-- Q Q
- Q Q
...
-< .....:l .....:l
~ ~
_J"'.'I",~,.
~i~'\.N ~'~"..
"IA. ~",..h'':''~J''",
~ l'. ", . ,.... :,l.';.
.. ii:$~',,' i" P/f>ff,--" -::
~~: ,,~<(~
:';;\ . , ~fi,"
-:'~-'" ,."g."
-"''TIf5.''m.'''~~,.
......... ~TE?, ,.,1
Fire Conditioff'''' Duanne Anderson 562-3039
07/31/2003 CODE SUMMARY INFORMATION NEEDS TO REFLECT ADHERENCE WITH THE FLORIDA
FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2001 EDITION (before building permit).
07/31/2003 ALL FIRE ALARM WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-72 BY A STATE LICENSED
CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (before biulding permit).
PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL WATER FLOW AND TAMPER
SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (before
building permit).
-
e
Conditions Associated With
FLD2003-07032
116 BRIGHTWATER DR
Not Met
Not Met
07/31/2003
Not Met
07/31/2003
07/31/2003J
ALL FIRE SPRINKLER WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-13 FOR ORDINARY HAZARD
GROUP1 IN THE GARAGE AREA AND NFPA-13R FOR THE RESIDENTIAL LIVING AREA.
ALL WORK TO BE BY A LICENSED FIRE SPRiNKLER CONTRACTOR WITH SEPARATE
PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (before building permit).
PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON SHEET
C6.2 (before CD B).
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Land ReSOUrj Condition Rick Albee 562-4741
07/29/2003 Need a tree survey all palms 10' clear trunk or greater on the property and within 25' on adjacent Not Met
properties, prior to building permit.
Parks & ReC]COndition
Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or Not Met
plat whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 12 existing
hotel/motel guestrooms and 6 proposed residential units, $600 due.
Print Date: 08/25/2003 CaseConditons
1 of 1
2:10 p.m.
-
.
FINAL AUGUST 14.2003. DRC COMMENTS FOR FLD2003-07032/PL T2003-00006
116-120 BRIGHTW ATER DRIVE
Case: FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - 116-120 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas II
Owners: Gary and Mary A. Jernigan.
Applicant: Anthony Menna.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ email: nestech@mindspring.com).
Location: 0.34 acres on the north side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 300 feet east of Hamden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist Distr'ict.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 11.9 feet (to
pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to
40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four
existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six
lots.
Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees inclnded:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Mark Parry, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson and
Dialme Hufford.
Applicant/Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Debra Harris, Anthony Memla and Reginald Termulo
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or
plat whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 12 existing
hotel/motel guestr'ooms and 6 proposed residential units, $600 due.
2. Stormwater:
a) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5 (before building permit).
b) Provide additional lot grading details showing swales and inverts conveying runoff to pond at
rear of site (before CDB).
c) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds (before CDB).
d) Show invelis of pond and side slopes on plan view (before CDB).
3. Traffic Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) Dimensions for all driveways must be shown (i.e. width and length).
b) No structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty
inches (30") above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's
Conmmnity Development Code, Section 3-904).
c) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
d) TIF to be detennined and paid prior to C.O.
4. General Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) Need to show location of trash room (included in Note 1 on Sheet 3.1) or amend Note 1.
b) A 6"xl" tee for the domestic water meter set is not required. The City will tap the water main and
the meter will be field located. All applicable fees to be paid by the applicant (before CDB).
c) DIP pipe required from the 6" tap to one joint on the service side of the DCV A.
d) Need to set a fire hydrant within 40-feet of the new FDC (before CDB).
e) Need to set a second fire hydrant for fire protection or show existing one within 500 feet.
Page Jof 4
e
.
f) Need to observe ten-foot separation between the proposed water and sanitary sewer lines.
g) Revise prior to CDB.
PL T2003-00006
h) Need cover sheet for plat (Dedication, Legal Description, Surveyors Cert., etc.)
i) Suggest that lot lines be squared off at the rear of the property.
j) Show all lot line dimensions, bearings, etc.
k) Revise h-j prior to Final Plat submittal.
5. Plannill!!::
a) The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation 7.9.
With existing elevations at 4.9 on the west side and 5.05 on the east side, and proposed elevation
changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the building, this means on the
east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential. Are the edges of the driveways on
the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross sections at these locations.
b) Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is 2.2 feet
between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.4 feet grade differential on the
west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally constructed.
c) General comment regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. If not
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
d) Provide a cross-section of existing and proposed conditions on the side of the building (east or
west).
e) Since this development is being subdividedlresubdivided, Section 3 -1908.A states that "The city
may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way be relocated
and/or placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is redeveloped." Also
noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground. Address on Sheets C2.1 and C5.1.
f) Waterfi'ont visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The triangle is a
45-degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on the water and along
the side property line. Revise and show on Sheets C3.1 and L 1.1.
g) Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in elevation from livable area
to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations, including waterfront
visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
h) Building Code requires an 18-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
i) Revise Sheet Cl.l for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is proposed and
discussed in the narrative. Also indicate proposed rear setback to building of 16.2 feet. Revise
proposed side (east) setback from 6.2-8.3 to 5.2-8.3 feet. Revise proposed side (west) setback
from 5.0-8.2 to 6.2-8.2 feet.
j) Dimension building on Sheet C3.1 and on Sheets E-l and E-2. Unclear where rear wall of
building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
k) Show on Sheet ELEV the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof) from the required
FFE (base flood elevation). Revise ground floor elevation to 11.0 feet.
1) Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheet ELEV is necessary.
There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be muted by any
landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on the front and rear
elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as part of the cornice, molding
underneath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions of wall, quoins and like
architectural elements. Architectural elements on side elevations should be consistent with and
complement front and rear elevations. Concern: Elevations provided by Douglas W. Lowe, P.E.
look extremely similar to those provided for project at 125 Brightwater Drive, provided by
Donoghue Wood & Associates Inc. Architects. Building plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
m) Revise Sheet Cl.l under "usage" to provide the correct square footage of each unit (not 1,020
square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 17.7 dwelling units per acre.
Page 20f4
e
.
n) Provide the proposed color of all building and architectural elements. Provide color samples.
Provide color rendering of building.
0) On the Preliminary Plat Sheet Cl.1A, provide the existing legal description of the subject
property.
p) Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet C1.1 and Sheet C3.1 to indicate the proposed side setback
to pavement (believed to be 9.5 feet). Revise narrative to ensure proposed setbacks discussed
match the site plan submitted.
q) The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing docks, but doesn't mention the number of
existing slips. Site inspection reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these existing
boats be removed? By when? Please address existing versus proposed circumstances with the
dock/slips.
r) The narrative should address the existing setbacks and scale/bulk of the existing development (at
one-story) in contrast to the proposed attached dwellings and its scale and bulk (at essentially four
stories), as well as its context in relation to adjacent development (existing or proposed) and that
along Brightwater Drive.
s) Proposed development appears to be extensive and excessive for this size of property.
t) The request is to reduce the side setbacks to 5.2 and 6.2 feet (east and west) to building and 9.5
feet to pavement. There is no landscaping proposed on the side (except hedge) or rear of the
building to mitigate the effects of the bulk of the proposed building due to the reduced setback.
Staff may not support the reductions requested without the provision of mitigation to minimize or
reduce the bulk issue. Advise/revise.
u) Comment: Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway configurations,
proposed setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for meaningful landscaping.
There is little landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building due to proposed site
characteristics (only a hedge proposed along sides).
v) ConIDlent: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided through garage
parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even temporarily) outside the garage
within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with these proposed townhomes. Different
than single-family detached dwellings where on-street parking by guests is possible, the site
design of these attached dwellings (townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street
parking by guests unless driveways are blocked.
w) Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet. Provide
justification as part of nanative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-to-four stories
over parking). Revise Sheet C 1.1 to indicate real proposed height (above base flood elevation of
11.0 feet).
x) Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This site is
indicated at 1,439 square feet, yet the project at 125 Brightwater Drive (which is extremely
similar) is indicated at 1,207 square feet, or larger by 232 square feet. One or both projects
appear wrong. Revise.
y) Provide on Sheet C 1.1 the proposed and required parking lot interior landscaping (square footage
and percentage of the paved vehicular use area).
z) Land area is too light to adequately locate the subject "project site" on the location map on Sheet
C1.1. Either darken or provide location map similar to that for 125 Brightwater Drive.
aa) Indicate on Sheet Ll.1 what is proposed for landscaping within the right-of-way between the
sidewalk and curb.
bb) Underground utilities (private and right-of-way).
cc) Address/revise above prior to scheduling for CD B.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments.
7. Land Resources:
a) Need a tTee survey all palms 10' clear trunk or greater on the property and within 25' on adjacent
properties, prior to building permit.
8. Fire:
a) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON
SHEET C6.2 (BEFORE CDB).
Page 30f 4
-
.
b) ALL FIRE SPRINKLER WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-13 FOR ORDINARY
HAZARD GROUP1 IN THE GARAGE AREA AND NFPA-13R FOR THE RESIDENTIAL
LIVING AREA. ALL WORK TO BE BY A LICENSED FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR
WITH SEP ARA TE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT).
C) CODE SUMMARY INFORMATION NEEDS TO REFLECT ADHERENCE WITH THE
FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2001 EDITION (BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT).
d) PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL WATER FLOW AND TAMPER
SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (BEFORE
BUILDING PERMIT).
e) ALL FIRE ALARM WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-72 BY A STATE LICENSED
CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (BEFORE BUILDING
PERMIT).
f) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Reconunend salt tolerant plant species for ponds. Ponds will be inundated twice daily by tidal
fluctuations.
10. Community Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapin!!::
a) Shift landscaping on sides of building to be along the wall.
b) Add a few palms on sides of building.
c) On rear of building there seems to be room for some plants in the areas between walkways to
boardwalk.
12. Harbor Master:
a) No problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing docks
will be retained. They are not a navigation concern in their existing configuration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than 4:00 pm.
Page 4014
2:10 p.m.
.
-
DRAFT Comments for AUl!ust 14, 2003, DRC
Case: FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - 116-120 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas II
Owners: Gary and Mary A. Jemigan.
Applicant: Anthony Menna.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ emai1: nestech(cV,mindspring.com).
Location: 0.34 acres on the north side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 300 feet east of Hamden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 11.9 feet (to
pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to
40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four
existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six
lots.
Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Mark Parry, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or
plat whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 12 existing
hotel/motel guestrooms and 6 proposed residential units, $600 due.
2. Stormwater:
a) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5 (before building permit).
b) Provide additional lot grading details showing swales and inverts conveying runoff to pond at
rear of site (before CDB).
c) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds (before CDB).
d) Show inverts of pond and side slopes on plan view (before CDB).
3. Traffic Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Dimensions for all driveways must be shown (i.e. width and length).
b) No structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty
inches (30") above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's
Connnunity Development Code, Section 3-904).
c) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
d) TIF to be detemrined and paid prior to e.O.
4. General Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Need to show location of trash room (included in Note 1 on Sheet 3.1) or amend Note 1.
b) A 6"x1 II tee for the domestic water meter set is not required. The City will tap the water main and
the meter will be field located. All applicable fees to be paid by the applicant (before CDB).
c) DIP pipe required from the 6" tap to one joint on the service side of the DCV A.
d) Need to set a fire hydrant within 40-feet ofthe new FDC (before CDB).
e) Need to set a second fire hydrant for fire protection or show existing one within 500 feet.
f) Need to observe ten-foot separation between the proposed water and sanitary sewer lines.
g) Revise prior to CDB.
PL T2003-00006
Page 1 of 4
,
.
e
h) Need cover sheet for plat (Dedication, Legal Description, Surveyors Cert., etc.)
i) Suggest that lot lines be squared off at the rear of the property.
j) Show all lot line dimensions, bearings, etc.
k) Revise h-j prior to Final Plat submittal.
5. Plannin{!:
a) The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation 7.9.
With existing elevations at 4.9 on the west side and 5.05 on the east side, and proposed elevation
changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the building, this means on the
east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential. Are the edges of the driveways on
the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross sections at these locations.
b) Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is 2.2 feet
between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.4 feet grade differential on the
west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally constructed.
c) General comment regarding Sheet C6.l - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. If not
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
d) Provide a cross-section of existing and proposed conditions on the side of the building (east or
west).
e) Since this development is being subdividedlresubdivided, Section 3-1908.A states that "The city
may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way be relocated
andlor placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is redeveloped." Also
noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground. Address on Sheets C2.1 and C5.1.
f) Waterfront visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The triangle is a
45 degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on the water and along
the side property line. Revise and show on Sheets C3.1 and Ll.1.
g) Provide a cross section tln'ough the pool area to explain the change in elevation from livable area
to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations, including waterfront
visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
h) Building Code requires an 18-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
i) Revise Sheet C1.l for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is proposed and
discussed in the nanative. Also indicate proposed rear setback to building of 16.2 feet. Revise
proposed side (east) setback from 6.2-8.3 to 5.2-8.3 feet. Revise proposed side (west) setback
from 5.0-8.2 to 6.2-8.2 feet.
j) Dimension building on Sheet C3.l and on Sheets E-l and E-2. Unclear where rear wall of
building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
k) Show on Sheet ELEV the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof) from the required
FFE (base flood elevation). Revise ground floor elevation to 11.0 feet.
1) Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheet ELEV is necessary.
There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be muted by any
landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on the front and rear
elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as part of the cornice, molding
undemeath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions of wall, quoins and like
architectural elements. Architectural elements on side elevations should be consistent with and
complement front and rear elevations. Concem: Elevations provided by Douglas W. Lowe, P.E.
look extremely similar to those provided for project at 125 Brightwater Drive, provided by
Donoghue Wood & Associates Inc. Architects. Building plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
m) Revise Sheet C1.1 under "usage" to provide the conect square footage of each unit (not 1,020
square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 17.7 dwelling units per acre.
n) Provide the proposed color of all building and architectural elements. Provide color samples.
Provide color rendering of building.
0) On the Preliminary Plat Sheet C1.lA, provide the existing legal description of the subject
property.
Page 2 of 4
-
e
p) Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet C1.1 and Sheet C3.1 to indicate the proposed side setback
to pavement (believed to be 9.5 feet). Revise narrative to ensure proposed setbacks discussed
match the site plan submitted.
q) The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing docks, but doesn't mention the number of
existing slips. Site inspection reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these existing
boats be removed? By when? Please addTess existing versus proposed circumstances with the
dock/slips.
r) The narrative should addTess the existing setbacks and scale/bulk of the existing development (at
one-story) in contrast to the proposed attached dwellings and its scale and bulk (at essentially four
stories), as well as its context in relation to adjacent development (existing or proposed) and that
along Brightwater Drive.
s) The request is to reduce the side setbacks to 5.2 and 6.2 feet (east and west) to building and 9.5
feet to pavement. There is no landscaping proposed on the side (except hedge) or rear of the
building to mitigate the effects of the bulk of the proposed building due to the reduced setback.
Staff may not support the reductions requested without the provision of mitigation to minimize or
reduce the bulk issue. Advise/revise.
t) Comment: Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway configurations,
proposed setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for meaningful landscaping.
There is little landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building due to proposed site
characteristics (only a hedge proposed along sides).
u) Conmlent: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided through garage
parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even temporarily) outside the garage
within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with these proposed townhomes. Different
than single-family detached dwellings where on-street parking by guests is possible, the site
design of these attached dwellings (townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street
parking by guests unless driveways are blocked.
v) Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet. Provide
justification as part of narrative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-to-four stories
over parking). Revise Sheet C 1.1 to indicate real proposed height (above base flood elevation of
11.0 feet).
w) Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This site is
indicated at 1,439 square feet, yet the project at 125 Brightwater Drive (which is extremely
similar) is indicated at 1,207 square feet, or larger by 232 square feet. One or both projects
appear wrong. Revise.
x) Provide on Sheet C1.1 the proposed and required parking lot interior landscaping (square footage
and percentage of the paved vehicular use area).
y) Land area is too light to adequately locate the subject "project site" on the location map on Sheet
C 1.1. Either darken or provide location map similar to that for 125 Brightwater Drive.
z) Indicate on Sheet Ll.1 what is proposed for landscaping within the right-of-way between the
sidewalk and curb.
aa) Underground utilities (private and right-of-way).
bb) Address/revise above prior to scheduling for CDB.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments.
7. Land Resources:
a) Need a tree survey all palms 10' clear trunk or greater on the property and within 25' on adjacent
properties, prior to building pemut.
8. Fire:
a) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON
SHEET C6.2 (BEFORE CDB).
b) ALL FIRE SPRINKLER WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-13 FOR ORDINARY
HAZARD GROUP1 IN THE GARAGE AREA AND NFPA-13R FOR THE RESIDENTIAL
LIVING AREA. ALL WORK TO BE BY A LICENSED FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR
WITH SEP ARA TE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT).
c) CODE SUMMARY INFORMATION NEEDS TO REFLECT ADHERENCE WITH THE
FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2001 EDITION (BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT).
Page 3 of 4
-
-
d) PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL WATER FLOW AND TAMPER
SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (BEFORE
BUILDING PERMIT).
e) ALL FIRE ALARM WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-72 BY A STATE LICENSED
CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (BEFORE BUILDING
PERMIT).
f) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt tolerant plant species for ponds. Ponds will be inundated twice daily by tidal
fluctuations.
10. Community Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapinl!::
a) Shift landscaping on sides of building to be along the wall.
b) Add a few palms on sides of building.
c) On rear of building there seems to be room for some plants in the areas between walkways to
boardwalk.
12. Harbor Master:
a) No problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing docks
will be retained. They are not a navigation concern in their existing configuration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18,2003, no later than Noon.
Page 4 of 4
.
e
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rice, Scott
Monday, August 04, 2003 1 :57 PM
Wells, Wayne
Brightwater Sidewalks
Wayne
Section 3.1907 of the Redevelopment Code requires a 4-foot sidewalk for local roads. Therefore, we should be requiring a
4-foot sidewalk for the developments on Brightwater Drive.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
srice@clearwater-f1.com
1
Pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 0829 1504932000 O.
Page 2 of5
08 / 29 /
15 / 04932 / 000 / 0530
29-Jul-2003 Jif'l Sf'lith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:10:47
Ownership In forrqat ion tl on -Resi den t i al P t'ope rty Address, Use, and Sales
J ERtIIGAtl, GARY
J ERtIIGAtl, MARY A
6012 MA RItI E RS WATCH DR
TAMPA Fl 33615-
COf'lparab le sales value as Prop Addr: 120 BRIGHTWATER DR
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census T r ac t : 260.02
sales frof'l 2000 - 2001 :
0 Sale Date O~~ Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac / If'lp
Plat Inforf'lation 9 /2,001 11. 560/1. 759 436,000 (Q) I
1951: Book 027 Pgs 032-033 8 /1.993 8,374/2,373 250,000 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 12/1. 991 7,752/ 408 345,000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 7 /1.990 7,325/ 351 300,000 (Q) I
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 365,000 HOPies tead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 365,000 Tax Exef'lp t %: .000
Other Exerqp t: 0
T axa.b le: 365,000 Agricultural: 0
.
2002 Tax Inforf'lation Land Inforf'lation
.,
District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay
Cleat'liJate r View:
02 Mi llage : 23 .2 911 Land Size Unit La.nd Land Land
, Fron t 'xflep th Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 8,501'..25 .l!>.
1) 64 i" 120 65. 00 7,656.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Wi tfiOU t the Sa v e - Ou r -H OPie:3 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
8,501.25 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exe~l~ t ions, ,', Total Land Value: 497,640
2002 taxes will be :
8,501. 25
Sf"wr t Legal BAYSIDE SUB tlO . 2 LOT 53
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi -c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b=1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/29/2003
Pinellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 01
08 / 29 /
Page 3 of5
15 / 04932 / 000 / 0530
:01
29-Jul-2003 Ji~ S~ith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:10:47
Co~~ercial Card 01 of 1 I~prove~ent Type: Hotel/Hotel < 4 St
Property Addre<:;s: 120 BRIGHTWATER DR Prop Use: 313 La.nd Use: 39
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor Syste~
Exterior Wall
Height Factor
Party Wall
Structural Fra~e
Roo f Fra~e
Roof Cover
Cab in e t & rvji 11
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Partition Factor
Continuous Footing
Slab on Grade
Conc Block/Stucco
o
Hone
Hone
Gable 0: Hip
Composition Shingle
Ave r'age
Carpet Combination
P laste r' Fu r'r'ed
o
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pc kg
Fixtures 20
Bath Tile
Electric
Shape Factor
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Other Depreciation
Function Depreciation
Econo~ic Depreciation
Floor' + Half
Ave rage
Rectangle
Aver'age
Wall
1. 954
30
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 3.007 7) .00 0
2) Open Po rch .30 522 8) .00 0
3) Open Po rch .20 306 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Cormnercial Extra Features
Description Di~ensions Price Units Va.lue RCD '( eaT
1) ASPHALT 1400SF 1. 00 1.400 0 1.400 1.970
2) DOCK 360SF 10. 00 360 0 1.440 1.970
3) FE tl C E 100 8.50 100 0 340 1. 970
4) SPA/JAC/HT 9X17 10.000.00 1 0 4.000 1. 970
5) PATIO/DECK 10 OS F 2.50 100 0 100 1. 970
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TO TA L RECORD VA LU E : 7.280
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[!][I]~[S]
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbin/cgi -click?o=1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/29/2003
[f<; II
D~ l~jfl~A ER II II
E;R [13~~M [MWr:'J
i I I DR IUW
3~S I _ _ I SRIGHTWA TER
,btv1D[}~1 II )~J 11 I
Dflif.PI'\SH1\~,iI EF.' [15 [I ~
II DR I BRIGrnY~)HER I 123 frt'-;'t:: 121::[ ,.1 '.c.
II Dn' 8RlpH~ JF1~,.$ fffi%!~m~:~:}9;
II i ' OF.' I Df.' 'f DR
I I I ]
Pi!1ellas County Property APp.er Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
t' --------.
---
g
---t~~~i''''
) (iJ 1':,
~.,' i"
"'-
I ..
I'::;/.-,~~ {
L.,jc: D I
rlf:;MDEf,~
DR
-~----.........._-
-.J
3::':-
lie/DoJ
1P
..J
f
~
(
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
Page 4 of5
~
I'~ rl<16
" ElI:tiV\' ,', IE
DR DR
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbin/cgi-click?o= 1 &a=l &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/29/2003
Pipellas County Property APp.er Information: 0829 1504932000 O.
Page 5 of5
~.. ~".':l:f --:J _cJ ...,.
I ( .,' 1 i. >10. ~{,:-.
;::
.*f..... . ....
/- . ~.. ..fr"\ ., .
................._......,............=t...............:.~..'l............:~ J-, J . I .fl......'..
~..u. -..;
:.r".. !"..
..,.. .. :.01. :,.-" r -
"":.1.." '.... .
.. ,. ..
.i ... "
-r ~ c.
,-
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1.us/htbin/cgi-c1ick?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/29/2003
Pindlas County Property APp.r Information: 08 29 15 04932 000 O.
Page 5 of5
.'1....'.'..'.',.,........',.'........,............ ,.'.'.'.' .... ....."'.'.". ,........,....,'. '."'.',.'."."..'.'."".........', "'".i'~. .....
."" . " "'1 '
, ....,,}; ./. ....".. ..... -, 1 . . -..1.
. I I . -4. .....
-..:!' .,
"" I'r.. .....
",1 . tr.'
.."t~. I. I
., . .. u "'l~
' .'f, \, .
JI'- . <....'<IiiIA, __.
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
BacklQ,SGarchEagG
An GX,p1anation of this s~reen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?0=1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/29/2003
Pinellas County Property App.r Information: 08 29 1504932000 O.
Page 2 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0540
29-Jul-2003 Jil'"l Sl'"Iith, CFA Pine lla.s County Property Appraiser 16:08:12
Olclnersh ip Inforl'"lation t~o n- Re side n ti al Prope rty Add t'ess. Use. and Sales
J ERtHGAN. GAR'" L
J ERtHGAtL MAR'" A
6012 MA RIt~ ERS WATCH DR
TAMPA FL 33615-
COl'"lparable sales value a.s Prop Addr: 116 BRIGHTWATER DR
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Tra.c t: 260.02
sales frol'"l 2000 - 2001 :
0 Sa,le Date OF~ Book/Page Price (G)ual/UnQ) Vac / Irrlp
Plat Inforl'"lation 8 /2.001 11.556/ 626 390.000 (0) I
1951: Book 027 Pgs 032-033 10/1.998 10.263/1. 604 270.000 (0) I
0000: Book Pgs - 9 /1.987 6.587/2.269 185.000 (0) I
0000: Book Pgs - 7 /1.986 6.271/ 723 185.000 (0) I
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 330.000 HOl'"lestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use <T. .000
,...
Assessed/Cap: 330.000 Tax Exel'"lpt %: .000
Other Exel'"lp t : 0
Taxable: 330.000 Agricultural: 0
2002 Tax Inforl'"lation Land Inforl'"lation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Cleat'water View:
02 Mi llage : 23.2911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 7.686.06
1) 62 x 120 65.00 7.308.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 . 00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Sa ve-Our-Hor'les 4) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes lJJill be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
7.686.06 6) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
Without any exerrJp t ions, Total Land Value: 475.020
2002 taxes will be :
7.686.06
Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 2 LOT 54
Description
Building Information
http://pao.eo.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlegi -ser3 70= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &e= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/29/2003
Pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 08 29 1504932000 O.
Page 3 of5
08 / 29 / 15 / 04932 / 000 / 0540
:01
29-Jul-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 16:08:12
COMMercial Card 01 of 1 IMproveMent Type: Hotel/Hotel < 4 St
Proper ty Address: 116 BRIGHTWAT ER DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39
Structural Elements
Foundation Continuous foo ting Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Spit
Floor Sys teM Slab on G t'ade Fixtures 9
Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stu cco E:ath Tile tfone
Heigrlt Factor 0 Electric Ave t'age
Par ty Wall t~one Sf-tape Factor Rectangle
Structural Frar'le t~one Quality Average
Roof FraMe flat \'ear Built 1,955
Roof Cover Built Up /COfilpO sition Effective Age 20
Cabinet & Mill Average Other Depreciation 0
Floor Finish Carpet COfllbina tion Function Depreciation 0
Interior Finish P laste t' fu t-red EconOMic Depreciation 0
Partition Factor 0
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base A t'ea 1. 00 1,350 ?) .00 0
2) Utility .35 398 8) .00 0
3) Open Po rch .20 425 9) .00 0
4) Open Po rch . 15 70 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) . 00 0 12) . 00 0
Cormnercial Extra Features
Description DiMension:s Price Units \/alue RCD '(ear
1) DOCK 1 2X 2 0 10.00 240 0 1.060 1,980
2) ASPHALT 1750 1. 00 1,750 0 1.750 1,980
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VA L U E : 2,810
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~[SJ
http://pao.eo.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/egi -ser3 70= 1 &a= 1 &b=l &e= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 7/29/2003
It
.
\:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September
16, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests:
NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that
are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring propertv owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and
approved bv a single vote at the beginning of the meeting.
1. Richard Cope / CMT Holding, Ltd. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a non-residential parking lot
within the HDR District with a reduction in the front (east) setback along S. Hercules Avenue from 25 feet to 15 feet (to
pavement) and to reduce the front (south) setback along Gulf to Bay Boulevard from 25 feet to 15 feet (to existing pavement)
and reduce the front (west) setback along Aurora Avenue from 25 feet to 3 feet (to existing pavement) (Proposed Use: A non-
residential parking lot in association with an existing office development) and the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet
(to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-703.1 and the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to pavement),
under the provisions of Section 2-703.1 at 1988 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd., Sec. 13-29-15, M&B 24.07 and part of Sky Crest Unit 7
Elk C, Lot 5. FLD2003-06031
2. Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. are requesting an Amendment to previous approvals for signage: 1) Cases FLD 02-02-
06A1SGN2003-02009 - Conditions 1 and 2 which requires that the final design, height, area, color, etc. of signs be consistent
with the drawings submitted to, or as modified by the CDB, and that the signs for future tenants of the retail center have the
same background and text colors as approved by the CDB, as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program, under the provisions of
Section 3-1807; and 2) Case FLD2003-05023 - Condition 2 requiring that all signage comply with the approved
Comprehensive Sign Program application FLD 02-02-06A1SGN2003-02009.. (Proposed Use: An amendment to a
Comprehensive Sign Program for Amscot Financial, Inc. [922 South Missouri Avenue]) at 922 South Missouri Ave., Sec. 22-
29-15, M&B 21.01. SGN2003-08001
3. Robert W. and Donna L. DeStefano (Anthony Menna) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached
dwellings with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 15.6 feet (to pools) and
from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit
parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and
Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. (Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings [townhomes]) at 125 Brightwater Dr., Bayside
Sub No.2, Lots 7 & 8. FLD2003-06030/PLT2003-00004
4. Gary and Mary A. Jernigan (Anthony Menna) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings
with reductions of the side (east) setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to nine feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20
feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat
approval for six lots. (Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings [townhomes]) at 116-120 Brightwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 53 & 54 FLD2003-07032/PL T2003-00006
5. Larry L. and Barbara S. Miller / Brightwater Pointe, LLC (Roland Rogers) are requesting a flexible development
approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement),
reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to
five feet (to pavement) and reductions .of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero
feet (to pool deck and boardwalk), with increases of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (to roof deck) with an additional six
feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and 16 feet (from roof deck for open gazebos) and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole use by the property owners) and the
Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403
e
.
(Proposed Use: Twenty (20) attached dwellings [condominiums]) at 205,209 & 214 Brightwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 27, 28 & 29. FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning
Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to
any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the
Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify,
present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests.
An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be
recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to
three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of
time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by
interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100
S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss
any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS A V AILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093.
Ad: 08/31/03
- tit / - ,
"
.
BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLA W j FIGUEREDO, RANDALL J - MARKS, IRWIN J
BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA FIGUEREDO, MISHA MARKS, DAWN D
345 HAMDEN DR 105 BRIGHTWATERDR 115 BRIGHTWATERDR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2402
MARKS, IRWIN J MARKS, IRWIN J DE STEFANO, ROBERT W
MARKS, DAWN D MARKS, DAWND DE STEFANO, DONNA L
115 BRIGHTWATERDR 115 BRIGHTWATERDR 125 BRIGHTWATERDR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2402
DE STEFANO, ROBERT W KOEGLER, WALTER A ZURAWSKI, BOGDAN
DE STEFANO, DONNA L KOEGLER, JEAN A ZURAWSKI, ANNA
125 BRIGHTWATERDR 620 ARDEN LN 139 BRIGHTW ATER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 PITTSBURGH PA 15243 - 1132 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402
BRAUKMAN ENTERPRISES INC GRIFFIN, BARRY N JR KULACH, STANLEY
10863 BOBCAT TER 2775 PINE TREE RD KULACH,ANNA
LITTLETON CO 80124 - 9531 LANSING MI 48911 - 150 BRIGHTW A TER DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
BRIGHTW A TER INV BRIGHTW A TER INV BRIGHTW ATER INV
ESTABLISHMENT ESTABLISHMENT ESTABLISHMENT
ZOLLSTRASSE 9 FL-9490 ZOLLSTRASSE 9 FL-9490 ZOLLSTRASSE 9 FL-9490
VADUZ LIECHTENST 00004- VADUZ LIECHTENST 00004- VADUZ LIECHTENST 00004-
GERMANY GERMANY GERMANY
MARSZALEK, ROMAN crus, MIECZYSLA W W CIEZCZAK, CHESTER
crus, MIECZYSLA W crus, MARIA CIEZCZAK, MARIA
166 BRIGHTWATERDR 162 BRIGHTW A TER DR 158 BRIGHTWATERDR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
KULACH, STANLEY TAMBACK, EDWARD P JR OGRODNY, BOLESLA W
KULACH, ANNA T AMBACK, CAROLE E OGRODNY, ZOFIA
320 ISLAND WAY # 607 144 BRIGHTW ATER DR 140 BRIGHTW ATER DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2181 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401
BAUSTERT, DELBERT V ZORRILLA, EUGENE BRADLEY, ROBERT L
BAUSTERT, MARY LOU ZORRILLA, RAFAEL L 128 BRIGHTW ATER DR
134 BRIGHTW ATER DR 130 BRIGHTW ATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
RINEKER INC JERNIGAN, GARY JERNIGAN, GARY L
124 BRIGHTW ATER DR JERNIGAN, MARY A JERNIGAN, MARY A
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 6012 MARINERS WATCH DR 6012 MARINERS WATCH DR
TAMPA FL 33615 - TAMPA FL 33615 -
SAUNDERS, WILLIAM BRIGHTW ATER ON THE BAY LENEART, RENEE TRE
SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY INC 8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
333 HAMDEN DR 175 BRIGHTWATERDR CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2449 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2411
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
W AZIO, IRENA
C/O CLEARWATER BCH MOTEL
110 BRIGHTW ATER DR #4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
W AZIO, IRENA
110 BRIGHTW ATER DR # 4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
SEACOVE PTNSHP
316 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2448
KALLAS, DORA
KALLAS, GEORGE
1451 GULF BLVD # 216
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2843
TAS, JERRY
TAS, TERESA
342 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2451
WILK, THOMAS J
WILK, STASIA
451 HARBOR DR S
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL
33785 -
-
- LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
W AZIO, IRENA
C/O CLEARWATER BCH MOTEL
110 BRIGHTW ATER DR #4
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2401
WILK, THOMAS J
WILK, STASIA
451 HARBOR DR S
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL
33785 -
DAROSAS, YOLANDA
PEREZ, FRANK R
PO BOX 6742
SEFFNER FL 33583 -
HALL, CLYDE W
HALL, HARRIET S
331 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433
SOFRONAS, JAMES
431 GULF VIEW BLVD S
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2508
JEDE CORP INC
2919 WEST BAY DR
LARGO FL 33770 - 2621
e
-. LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
LENEART, RENEE TRE
8556 W WINNEMAC AVE
CHICAGO IL 60656 - 2925
P ALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN
INC
C/O W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
110 BRIGHTW ATER DR # 4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
W AZIO, EUGENIUSZ F
W AZIO, IRENA
C/O CLEARWATER BCH MOTEL
110 BRIGHTW ATER DR #4
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401
BAY LAWN
406 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535
DAROSAS, YOLANDA
PEREZ, FRANK R
PO BOX 6742
SEFFNER FL 33583 -
MIJATOVICH, MOMIR
MIJATOVICH, ELLA
333 CORONADO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433
WILK, THOMAS J
WILK, ST ASIA
451 HARBOR DR S
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL
33785 -
SEACOVE PTNSHP
316HAMDENDR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2448
SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B
SHAH, MANNA J
326 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2448
US-EURO-TRADE INC
346 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 -
CLIFFORD, RUTH M
180 TOWER LN
ELK GROVE VLG IL 60007 - 4214
GERRITZMANN, DIETHARDT
GERRITZMANN, GABRIELA V
AM HAAG 12C
65812 BAD SODEN 00004-
GERMANY
CONTI, CAMILLO
CONTI, LIVIA
136 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services
601 Cleveland S1. STE 930
Clearwater, FL 33755
-
.. CZAICKI, EDWARD
CZAICKI, BOZENA
332 HAMDEN DR
CLEARW ATR BEACH FL 33767 -
2448
GREENBERG, MARTIN A
835 MANDALAY AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
MINNITI, JOHN A
MINNITI, JACQUELINE
510 SYCAMORE TER
CINNAMINSON NJ 08077 - 3545
MORGAN, GEORGE W
122 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
Clearwater Beach Association
Pres. David MacNamee
827 Mandalay Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33767
at
TAS, JERRY
TAS, TERESA
342 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2451
BARROWS, SCOTT 0
BARROWS, JUDY L
409 HAMDEN DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2536
SIMON, RICHARD A
1474 S P AIRIE AVE #D
CHICAGO IL 60608 - 2208
BARROWS, SCOTT 0
BARROWS, JUDY L
130 BA YSIDE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501
Anthony Memla
21030 US 19 N
Clearwater, FL 33765
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
September 17,2003
Mr. Housh Ghovaee
Northside Engineering Services, Inc.
601 Cleveland Street, #930
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - 116 - 120 Brightwater
Drive
Dear Mr. Ghovaee:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On September 16, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.6 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to
nine feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to
building), from 20 feet to 13.9 feet (to pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and
with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four existing boat slips and two docks
for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and
conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-804.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, NiAYOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE IvLwOR-COMMISSIONER \;VHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER "w BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AJ'lD AFFIR1\L"'TPiE ACTION EMPLOYER"
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 2
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That boats moored at the docks be for the exclusive use by the residents and/or guests of the
townhomes and not be permitted to be sub-leased separately from the townhomes;
3. That the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 303 standards for "marinas and
boat yards" be met to the satisfaction of the Fire Department prior to the issuance of any
permits, including a detail for the wet standpipe;
4. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall
setbacks;
5. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground and installation of conduit(s) along the entire length of the site's street frontage
be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy;
6. That revised landscape plans, including details showing the relationship of the proposed
driveways and landscaping to proposed grade elevations to ensure proper transitioning and
installation methods to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and the type of
landscaping within the right-of-way, be submitted prior to the issuance of any permits; and
7. That a tree survey (including palms) for the subject site and within 25 feet be submitted prior
to the issuance of any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (September 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final detemlination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on October 1,2003 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
....
September 17, 2003
Ghovaee - Page 3
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
\ IMS5clPDS\Planning Department\C D B\FLEXiPending cases\Up for the next CDB\Brightwater 116 Belle Aqua Villas II\Brightwater 116
Development Order. doc