The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2003-08036 " lwater - ~ _u~~ . Planning Department r: (~ E ~ \1 'k= ~A T~E :Eat:ED?'~~J~~~/~~~~ 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff initials):. ';;q. ~ Clearwater, Florida 33756 '"' 8 2003 ATLAS PAGE #: '~~A Telephone: 727-562-4567 AUlJ 1 ZONING DISTRICT: C:- Fax: 727-562-4865;:;'1 ;\\L\q;~H-::::, 11,;':Oi~r-;;;TVIC~ ~~~~~~~~S~~~~A~~O:~J~~T , ~J ,';' 1 ! ,',,' L',..., > d ,. d 1-, IpROPERTIES' . SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APP(j:QA.Tlb~JF CLEi\F.'//ATEF NORTH: ~ })~~~ SOUTH: l~ ~.~, WEST: ~cJ:. EAST: .~-~ ~~~(, . , * NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI o o o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ FLEXIBLE Comprehensive _ PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- L Gl use additional sheets as necessary ., C;,i"\JVrI I en A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: 1 ~ 'i D P- ~ MAILING ADDRESS: I R" 5 ~ R-F-J)CD.A\ LPt-1'Vf::- C ie;;;:..rJoJe, ~fi- ~ 31"-4- E_MAILADDRESS:l-b~Y.GL~N~ 6.~-t.~e..<.P"" PHONE NUMBER: /2"1--53b -77:;1.3 c.1\ i.....I.. j <;'''' 7b Ml\Kb. S ~ <-Z......c xS FR.c...~ FAX NUMBER: 12J-Y3b - 1'1 2!> CELL NUMBER: -7 J-7 - &. cr ~ - L.tO 3 to PROPERTY OWNER(S): LA p-fl... -( I:.'l CAN (Must include ALL owners) -I'- To- Pr/VtJ bE::.Pr~ AGENT NAME(S): ,....; /~ MAILING ADDRESS: E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of subject site: <1 '3 5" L,~ K'E: V :r:..f;;:vJ (-to .'\ b i C.LEA~v-JA~ . rt.-, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LA),$ S i....cC...K. i l-A Ke ~ ~ ~ V I:. 6'..,J .ft 0 o~ n::-~ e location of this document in the s.ubmittal) ~.5"' ':';-7" (')0 (,{) PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: 5"0 0 u 9i (acres, square feet) .f?J~ PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: I STO R -t 0 fY-'r.cE:.. v "3:: 1+-1 ~ J 'I ~ A;y r t ~ p;~~r . (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) MD-S"\ 0 r:- l""H-E:.. f) '..).J:..L-D :DJ6 To Dr=. vsc::...o h>~ Sn~6;::"" ~G QVt.v...~ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): p..E..i)JC-.-x:ov J::t.J L-o T" ~..::.z...c.. ,~ S::. Tb ,'",c...K.. g.E:.QuD~r.::,"^E:...Ji7";. (include all requested code deviations: e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) r..E r....1? C ~ I" .'TiZ-K LUG S;'Ptc..c$. >.J , ...... . , - Page 1 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater , . . I' 'DOES THiS APPLICATION INVOLVE TL_ ,'RANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A . . .EVll./JSL Y APPROVED PLANNED ur\lrr" DEVE:LOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X- (if yes, attach a copy,of the/applicable .<Jocuments) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) d SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ArfES;nNGOWNERSHIP(se'e<T page 6) ." . ~"1. i .~ . '.;) i -~, D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) s/ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. /) E:. .I:. c" (>r-f-J e - ~V.A.... _ (-f:r c...f::. r.! ~:c..s6 11) , ~ S'- c:l F !:. f'rtoJ ~ PI "^ v'- ~ .:c.. - ~:t- ....-1 0 F- -...Je l..-.? r f'^. E:.,.....J'j TO ntf=- tAsr- n~ H....~ ~ ~...,.rE:v...;I,":)J ~ f"D i S 'I Ft..v.:. " ,- n-rn-r- 2. l,.;;C~ CO ta-o~ E:..ft.. TTE-S 'jj..J ntt AJ:!...f:A . M'1 [1<..1 :I:.......DTJ-.U', ~S "^A~,,,V rz- -t vo-'I-t':'I:C Hv-O<...JI...-.Cl ('[l.e ~ A-i:.L-f A-W~Sf=. 1-r.i=c:.r+('::lLTl~ T1tE:- S rE;...E..(... . oH"-rc.f.:: B.;. J...D. 7't) ~ vvE:Sl". 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. """'I v 3 f::.. of' "f1-te B;.,/z.i-l) 'OJ t', ~~.s ~1""" I).JUJ..JDE:...- f+l..J1 1+A-2..AJU:YJ '..J c; AC r:I::vr-a:E=\ . z,zS '1/\ 1\(- u "if-- j) F"~ 0 F-(~Le I ~~ ~ ~<o.J.JJ . 1"4. t;. \~ ><- fiK'_ Cl.u-J \'1 ~ ,.... i 'L-AR-6c. S"2:l,~<S6- ~. c...A-V E::7VtE:2.. t- E::~:r:\" (-f7~ .~ II f-lC.,. F ~~~ I4U::A 6 .;..Ner.z...! Oc....-.u P .~ ~ u"if::. 'T1tf:. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. .;-. .. v' r:- M 'OJ-r I ~'":Cc.. <J;1"J()E::- '" Cu5. ,.... \:'>V:I:-LD Tb t::.~x..- 0 r: 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ~ A.i'...h.. o f1"'C c..f:. f'-e.s~f:.~ + ~~l.- 13;.;..I::i.-O :D-J6,S I;\..J ntE:. ~E:Jl~ v z- c .-r. .Y." '0;--( o~ M.-{ P!'-c l? 6 <; r- f\ {)r-vG-L-O(J M~ ,; 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ,'V'--t 0 r-?CC.f::-1 C-',.LJn (', v-Ju '..J:.-D rv<.rr P a..l; S~ f+.I-J~ Nr.-l;"r"\"'r.t=-'-..E:..liV\PA-C'" 10 ThC:- ;~ .. i1UJ'r...s c:+ of'r=-f'~J '..;.A'..J~ ~<:.. 0 A-/'TI:M~ OVL-{. 'flH:. 6'J':J::'-J);:;..J6 -C-S j""() /5;-. u,~;::'.D fi. !?- s ;l, l1.J~ €.S 't 01+1 O~-c:c.I:. v,~e.., ,v 0 I'-'f:.. e,. "rT'1=-"'-E:... (K...c) ..V; ~ t.. ) U-\-y.tr cm f!- -t eX:- V r-su.;,~ ,,.....,-r:c: c...z: ~}T-\E:.1) . ri Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2: rvf-...f.JJ nt(::;. W7" S::;"-z.k-_ ~c..o../':"'TRiJ t" 5:= T~:+C.K r-f--l>'-"~~...J 'IJ-.J c.\U);:::Q.. Tn c,...;:i:--.J) J~ M'C.G..w"~ c..::c.-:u::.. ?,'Jr:i.-4l:Q..)0 . ;?-kJ.)....IL:n:::.~.u :JJ f"1.\..P-~;v.JG v.AV~C. ~~r~()07_~':c. M:::..~~~{-::::Urv.;C..S~~'Z:.S CeM.l,)f'_-r~cs. f'N.:.~ ~ I 1'2.. T!<if!i--dJ.I.. cl-~~:: / ~C.C....Arr.~ , ._' . n, . ." r" ,'. . :;::;_ E ~ - ~ . I~ - . -----i:"- . . _ ~ -... ._,;) ~~ f'~~""~e 2 ~7 _ ~;;ble ~~v~I;P~ tpPlicari~c~r:,~ensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater ..- . . ~. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements. } c' ""'2:"cS/(' .u .:- c..DMf'.<:V'-A-8~ :oJ vAW-IE. -;0 ;:.;,....-D.DJG -n::.e:S. '('~'7€.C;\ VV\~ CoM.A-C:'~ v.Jv"-',-O fiE:... \NO e:.nt ~.-; IS T1) .$ I ex:, I ouO . c..c. , 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ~ .~ ll./:-f2-EA-O--t o~u:::. ~ .~S1:DF-JJTT.wt- Oc.vG-L.ofM~ .,D...; ~ ~ PrtvO ntt:i<::' u,E=.~ ~ ALSO PCJ?..ML\T'EJ) r.~ Tl~ CL:-ri of- C~~ ~ 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. j)tf:::Ui:-:cs M'-''--r:I:- ~S::L:-i J 5:::;:;-.JGJ=.:: ~.I:t....'i () F\-:rr e:::-_ J f?J=- ~L. -to LrG rt"'f" o CC.\J.f' .!~AA'" ~_:J:.. 'V1:AJ b v.JO .J-l) B S Co M-P."H"1:-B LE. v...r~ 0 ~S C-l/~ u S& . M.f'WJV~C. ;VSL:D.JC -nJ f""H'{:.. A-l'J--A ^ t-.~"'" . ""....., -PfLo('O->CO vS0-. Of- OFT::rc.f:. +-6.J..J~ 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. .A.Jt:>-r' "'^- 'f M..EAS AS" TYtcl'" S IT€:.. On ~S A ,--T1-tu v 6 \~ ni-b'-l M/Ir't BG A~~E:.-... 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. p C - nt1; -;-:z:ME.. ~ v A (.A.,....r/ t- -;rt-f:. ~VL-n vt"G..'tA-C1::.. "f"")-+€:... 1:MME..O .~ v.s::.c...rJJ~"r'f (\ ""1 P ja.O vrJ) :DJ 6 A- -rn2..JK....r:r:vf.. f'-iV'O A- E:. .5 i""l::..- -n::- CA u.... -( t>LEA 5 DJ G 6 F-F'3=c...S .s p A C. 6. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~<" P~O:T"F-o cr E:.v~U::-S '1'11<;:... co~urJ:r-r-t c~c..:n=-..-e. ~.J6H "or f'L6AS:J:.vG. A ('_<:"1+ Zn;..c. TU~PrL- o IS S.z: c...0 Fa ~ a f-P:c r f:. S 9 "'re f:.. "i'"lt-E' MA SO W ~ 'i B '..r-.....L-n .DJ6 .v...n;..L.L Pr() D ,~~_ Or ~'CY_~&VC€: Tb \liE... A-P-f:.A > 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~ f- ~ - J:' ~.. P..c \"b 1......0- &'C..'Z-E .S \-I'h..I....() ,vcr C. e:: A e~o: 'r.JJ\. .:D-J (u:: G" (-\..Lo."'lS .oc v E. \-tCc-u' r.U) 0 P- reo €os ~ .R...A-F-F-rC O.....eJ2- \-Mt.....F n-K:.. 13....i:I:-~:I:.~6 ~ .~:=A- :c.$' S \"'0 QA- G.r- .;- vJ:1:-l...-L- ;'In-r' G ~~ ntf- i'\...'F..-EJ) Ml Q... A-O {)I"TI::oJ,..JA-L t'.~D-.JG S P.:>rc...e:..s . 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for develop merit. p.c. ~ 'Th !i:t "'" f' L-A tV 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. tv/A tv:::'e \IV r n-M:AJ 'Il-t-t::.... ~f\"';'E:... ()-S\""f.L::I:.~~ Page 3 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater . ,E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMIT~ . .- k'-..cuIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-20 ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; e1 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); gI" LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study w ill be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o / SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): -L.. All dimensions; .2. North arrow; ~ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; 2 Location map; ;:7 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; 7 Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; z.. All required setbacks; ./ All existing and proposed points of access; j' All required sight triangles; /" Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen - trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; ,/ Location of all public and private easements; -:;-- Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ~ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; ./ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; --:-/ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; --"'"/ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per /' Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; -/ Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; --:-/ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; --"-/ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ;;r Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ,/ land area in square feet and acres: - Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 2' Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; V Gross floor area devoted to each use; ./' Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; ~ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; -:L Size and species of all landscape material; ;::;/ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; :;/ Building and structure heights; ./ Impermeable surface ratio (LS.R); and ;/ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) and color rendering if possible o FOR BEVE::LOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foci!contoUl~t or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations itrequired ,~9 evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; ...-_ Location of all earth or water retaining waifs..i:lndearth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ^ lU (: . ) 'J' Ii I ! Structural overhangs; -~-______ ~\ U I 6 tJ11;: Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canOj5y-(€lripJines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater I'd ~ ~ o . . LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBJI"Il1 TAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-11 02..., LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 y, X 11) (color rendering if possible) IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) I!! ~ o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. M BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials ci' REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required I. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS f Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height. etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. A. I'J'" l~\t lJ 1:) iUL Page 5 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . t(. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~tt...day of ~ A.D. 20.Q3 to me and/or by ...Jo ftnlfl l)<~.., . who is personally known has produced Fo L. 'i) Son ~'ZA '60fS74 0 as identification. \ \~-" _.J n- - CL--v'VY\ '~) {' n r<\ Signature of property owner or representative ~{?~~:t;~d'':. '. Judy Lubitz ;*:,"'r!:A'\*~ MY COMMISSION # CC946717 EXPIRES ~'~i>l June 18, 2004 "~,P.f.,~if.'~ BONDEO THau TROY fAIN INSURA,.,(;E, INC. 1\ 11(' ~ ;1". )ill!'; ,~" ! !.l .~_ U ~-1 .-' Page 6 of 7 _ Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . ~~ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) I o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ..dfh S rn to an subscribed before me this ~ day of A.D. 20 ~ to me Slod/or by ,~ho is personallv kno\Vil) has as Virginia M Costa April-4, 2007 IOIlDEll THaU TROY FAIN INIUIWlCE. IHC ''In ,),] Allf; 1 R ntL, Page 6 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: LA-...F.R , J)~AA-I (Names of all property owners) r J1) ,AJl-,tJ ~e:-~ 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 9 '::3 5 ~t~ u. ~ h- 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) oFH:Cf:; v ~nt J)f. )~G . ,.J'rl - .~~ 1A-..J A- ~~ J? Cr A-t.... a:.S-r--(2:ee.. j 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: So, . e.L--~ as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (l1we), ... unde",;.ned authonty, hereby oert;fy that the forego;n. ;s ~.t. i1 . .L...~ , Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELtAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this I 'll day of Ac1ttIl~ . 'Zo~.3 personally appeared L-tlW{Z.;f!;MC 1>_ ~.Ai"J who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ~ ,Ai. fl.. PL D5bO-.IZ~-~3-Z~ My Commission Expires: R~l" James ~ ~.. i. ~~ . ~. .; My ComtT1ISSlOll [)()0.49138 otary ublic ~ Of f'.-" Expires August 12. 2005 S:\Aanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive in fill application 2002.doc ;. ii':' l U L .' Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater An Equal Opportunity Employer Thomas G. Dabney, II Chair, Sarasota Watson L. Haynes, II Vice Chair, Pinellas Janet D. Kovach Secretary, Hillsborough Maggie N. Dominguez Treasurer, Hillsborough Edward W. Chance Manatee Ronnie E. Duncan Pinellas Pamela L Fentress Highlands Ronald C. Johnson Polk Heidi B. McCree Hillsborough T. G. M Jerry" Rice Pasco Judith C. Whitehead Hernando David L Moore Executive Director Gene A. Heath Assistant Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel Protecting '(our Water Resources . Soutllwest Florida Water Management ,District --.~--..~ . 2379 Broo~ Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TOO only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 578-2070 Bartow Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Rorida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 Lecanto Service Office 3600 West Sovereign Path Suite 226 Lecanto, Rorida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 667-3271 August 8, 2003 Larry and Jo-Ann Dean 1856 Redcoat Lane Clearwater, FL 33764 Subject: Notice of Final Agency Action for Approval ERP General for Minor Systems Permit No. 46025445.000 Project Name: Larry Dean Painting County: Pinellas Secrrwp/Rge: 21/29S/15E Dear Mr. and Ms. Dean: This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action for approval of the permit application referenced above. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statute (F.S.), and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code (FAC.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.A.G. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 40D-1.1 010, F.A.C., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. The enclosed approved construction plans are part of the permit, and construction must be in accordance with these plans. AU(; i (3 iUU3 . . Permit No.: 46025445.000 August 8, 2003 Page 2 If you have questions concerning the permit, please contact Abdul Waris, P.E., at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2053. For assistance with environmental concerns, please contact Shonda L. Worley, extension 2073. Sincerely, attl~fJtk Alba E. Mas, P.E., Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM:AW:elb Enclosures: Approved Permit wlConditions Attached Approved Construction Drawings Statement of Completion Notice of Authorization to Commence Construction Noticing Packet (42.00-039) Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAC. celene: File of Record 46025445.000 Michael J. Gaylor, P.E., Gaylor Engineering /1UL; ,'~ ,~\.i\!_': . . OCTOBER 9, 2003 Bryan Berry, Planner Municipal Services City of Clearwater Planning Dept. Deal Mr. Berry, This letter is to inform you that I am aware that the project at 935 Lakeview Road is to be used as office space and not as mixed uselresidential space. If you need anything else please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~'~AJ~~ ~o~~\ Larry and Jo-Ann Dean TGI ";It:\H...I ~~~T~rl~4lN3 N~3a EULgE9U8 Et:~1 L551/ct/G0 . . A question was raised by one of the neighborhood residents that dealt with the question of paint disposal. Disposal is the last resort for a painting contractor. Preceding disposal of paint products comes source reduction, simply buying enough but not too much paint to do the job at hand. Many painting jobs use similar products and any left over paint can be used on another project. A second coat or just product left over for the homeowner to use are other viable options. Pinellas County also has a hazardous waste disposal site where used paint is often recycled. Painting contractors pay to drop off overage up to 4 times / year. A painting contractor might use this option if there is too much product (over half a gallon in a gallon can for instance) to dispose of For smaller quantities PinellasCounty would allow you to dispose of the paint in the waste stream by drying the product. This is accomplished by leaving the lid off the paint can and drying the paint out. Empty metal paint cans with a dry paint film are usually recyclable. A painting contractor could also dispose of paint by pouring a small quantity on cardboard or having it absorbed by kitty litter and then letting it dry in the sun until no liquid remains. The dried paint along with the different materials would then be put in a plastic bag and thrown away. At no time would paint be poured down the drain into the sewer system or out on the ground to contaminate the water table. These are serious infractions that common sense dictates is not acceptable. The small amount of latex paint remaining in a brush or roller is usually washed out with massive quantities of water that dilute any harmful substances. In the case of an oil based product, solvents such as mineral spirits are used to clean equipment or thin paint. Again it is preferable to use up the product. In the case of cleaning, mineral spirits are captured in a container with the residues from the brush. Rollers are usually allowed to dry and then thrown away. After a while the residues settle out of the mineral spirits and the mineral spirits can be reused. The oil residue which is left is left to dry and then disposed of as mentioned before. Again, no paint goes down the drain or into the ground. I hope this has helped explain why there should be no problem with excess paint when taken care of by a conscientious painting contractor. Larry Dean Lany Dean Painting Member ofPDCA (painting and Decorating Contractors of America) lwater :..~~ .u~~ . ~f'''~ ~ IE Jr. r<- O'::::4Oc;3..:" ~~~. ~",.,,} DATE RECEIVED: ~II '3/~'SS "- ~ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): . 54 ~ ATLASPAGE#: '~~A ZONING DISTRICT: e- LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: Ccr -eURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ~~_.~ . c. ." ( . NORTH: '-c ' IT7'-U -- })~\:::U:.."" SOUTH:J.~ ~.~, ~ o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including WEST: tQf<-/~ 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans EAST: .~-~ n.~~(, <;, o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ~~ - -. . l---"~""~' ..... P- r".. * NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS sETJ01.i.'j! '.. I.W IT~"., q; . ,. Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue ClealWater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ,fY:;'- {\~} o AUG 8 2003 o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APP(j:OATlb~jF .' \ . , FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLItArrId~ 2 2 2003 ;_~\' Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revi+~ i:l(9fI,Pz:t;.,:--: ,j15F:'.: ,-l...c~ L ell'( Or .s:ll- ;~i'\'M\ I efl \ _ PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheets as necessary , A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: l ~....., D r ~ MAILING ADDRESS: i R .s ~ t:2. F- J) CD.F\\ LA-f'-J'i::.. c ie.::...V""""e. ~fi.. 331 G,.+- E-MAIL ADDRESS: l-b~ t.t Q...T"f'WY!P.<:\ 6.~-t.t:'.e..CPM PHONE NUMBER: i2'J-S3b ,-77:;1.3 c." u... i"~ ... 7b M/.\V-b. SVi'-J: '-Zr--C:. xS rR.c..r:.. FAX NUMBER: '1:li-Y3b-T,23 CELL NUMBER: -7 J-7 - f.t:, cr ~ - 4-0 ~> <0 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Lp.,Rfl.. -( J::') CAN (Must include ALL owners) -4'- :ro- ANN bf=Aw AGENT NAME(S): ,tV / ~ MAILING ADDRESS: E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of subject site: <1 ",3 5" L."\ v<E: V :r...f::;.vJ {-to .'\ b C.<-E:.A~vJAn=...e.. fL., /--o..-s B i....ct....K. I i-A Kc. (?, r-:. t...i...J::. V 1:. 6-vU .ft P () c. n:: ~ e location of this document in the s.ubmittal) ~.5" .:.r '7 50.,0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: MD S ...- 0 r n+E:.. s-o oU 91. f7J ' fA.. (acres, square feet) 11QD J "~ TO ft -t 0 fYzc.E:.. ~n i ~,g ~p <:: t ,t~_~..:rx::;C"""'O'O~'""f.~ (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) fh..n::.i .1) ::;::JoJ6 TO G(::. V'3E:.J) ~ft- STb (Z.A6 S. .. PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): l~..f:...{)..Jc.....--n::oJ jJ....) L-O T ~ ~ z..t:.. ,~ S ~"\ b :~c..K... ~E:.o..VD~r.::.ME:...ur:"'.>, (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) r I? c.'~ ~~ ."'r~i<. r..J-1G. Sr.~oSS '-' . \ ~ Page 1 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of ClealW ater " . . ,."'~'" DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE Tl,_ I"RANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A ' . ,EVIV JSL Y APPROVEQPLANNED UNIT DEVE:LOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the-'applicable .jocuments) :I L c. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) Ef SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR. SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (Se'Et I page 6) . --.- ;'1 i D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) ~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. n _C:. J:. <~ f'r-I'J e.. - vt:.-V,A;:..r-. .....X<.-JD.P-J6n ~ f'rt-J II A M. V'- '" ~ - f-A.v'\ r.......-{ 0 F- 'V'e ~ P ME;.t---l'l 'Ti) T'lt'C- F-Asr- n~ H-<I~ ~ ,cb-.J.rSv.../ ,-:)J 'Hf:.. f(,!.b I Sf"" n...x..' , - . . nrm- . 'v'E:. -f'-\-r\:...S 2. l.o1:'~ r~{' ~TrE..S 'u.,...J nit ~ . M'1 [l_n:.<-D~{'. .::..s:. "^AS,....V(t..-I ~~;4 .......ou......n f~ ~ ~L-f A-W~s.\::. lri:t;.H-C-D T1~ -ntE:- s rE:..E-L ().n""];:~ Ri.. J...D. TO ~ vvE-sr-. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. ""''f u;:iE:- of' 1I-tC B'-".J:..i..-D'UJh ~tS ~'I" I)..JC-UJD,"=- f'M.J7. I+A-LA~~'-'~ AC'i"':C.vr-r.I:E=\ .ZT".J:.S ,~ C'.r- u'if--.Jl F'~ oF-{-2:-Le/ L.I..~r-. u;.,_pJ.jII.~~ \4ttt<- flMA_ d:'~ li'.p ~,'L-A-J<!-6c. S'2>~<:6- A-fLf:A. 4. ., -r-"':C c. C,.oJ.JcS e - ,.J 4 <:.v<; I ,... (-;7-6.tJ\. ilK::.. f AJU""~~ ,ag hA (') ,~etl... / O~ P .'4AJ(' CJW.-J u'iE:. "iltf:. BV:t:.LD Tb ^ r: 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ~ A..D..f._ o f'1""'C ck::. P-.e:,S~E:.~ 4- ~~L- B'..J.J::i.-Q DJ6 S ::r:;LJ T1tf=..I:MME::Jl LfrrE:.. V.i:c. ~. K"''1 of- M.-{ P!'-o It 0. <; po j) {)l-vb.L.-O~ M~ .. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. &. c. ~ \J..,J~'-J, l~r .r; TI1{:. i1U JI'-i ~'..J':...JJ o A..JL-(' -;1H::. 6'JX- --.b.::A.J- . 'V' h> ~ So ;}, \~~ €oS l' 0 A--l oR'"'-cc.k:. v:;/S, .v;) J'..>f:: ~ ."I-r1=-"';:... ~o..J-S; -,,:::.t.. I Ci.-\-Y'r '-11) f!- --t oe.. V .r:-:.J~~ f~.-:r:c.J::- (' }lr1'E:.J.) . ri Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. I tvf-...f..J) nj-{::- W7" s::.:z..k-_ f,f=j)",:':;-R,<...) r 5:= TUi'r(.K f''';:''-tI-.J~~~ r;..J C.\W);~ Ttl {L..n::.L...il i~ 8:QS\:1-..1~ c,,:J;-;z....C. i'\;JI:~o..;c.:;, ?-kJ.Y..Ir~.u :DJ r~ ~s)Jc. \A.4-...1-:t), m~'lrr-.()f)7-l:.J'r"I'"'€:- e)\::::.~~ ~ i ''1 T1~' ,. '.- ,.0.........(' ...~ ~- _. .. c;; -5- ' ~" r..f:::~~,-..--cr~e..2-~ _ ~,~fppiTcfi~n~m~ensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater ':c.. '" --..p. ~ e . The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties, (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements,} C, ;-"1:'CS /(-<.J vvO>...J' . [- c..o"'\t'l~J.'-A-8c.G. D-i v,t:\w.;S -;0 -n::.ES, -1'~.c:v:€c..:~ VJ\~ CoMF\..E',E- v.,I,;;":,,,-.....O Or- \M:l ~;H C,.u;.> IS Tb $ i (X;,. CUo . c.t:. , ~. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. T11"C11-C. .~ ,"\-L-~'f o~u:::. A-,Iv{) P-c-S'I:D F-JJT"r.A-'t- OcvG.L.ofM~ .JJ..,J ~ ~ AL SO f'8LM.:t:.. \T""'E:J) L....J n~ CI:. ...."1 or c~~ ~ ~ T'>tt:o ::,(::. u " f'=.- ~ .n....P..E:.. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. LL~ :c-S M."'~-r:r. ~r::t...-; J S.:;:;;...JG~ ~:r::....'i J OF\-:rrc=... f?-f=.TY'\-"r~ 'to Lrc:;,~ Mf'WJv'ri\-c.. iV'l-DJC ~ ~ ~J--A ^ t-~'-( . fV'''"''1 .pP-()(>6"~ vSe O~ Orr:cc..E:. r(Jv.J~ Oc..t..-V'.f',,~ :"":L"s;...sG. UJoJ-.O as CDM.P.~LE. v..r~ O~s r_u~ uSE-' 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. !JO l" "'^- '1 Nf...fAS AS T\'1:CS S :::: TE. On f:: S A ,...:n-tu oJ 6 ,-+ nt-€:- ...., M/Ir '{ 136. A ~c.....AA h.. .... 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. t€. p c.. - -;"J::/V\E. rS v A (.A.I'JI '- ~ ~ v.../'n VL-n vrG~r:. ~ r.JV\ME..O.l'~ v~.c..r:.JV:I:'T1 (\ ""1 P ~v:ro I).J 6 A--i'T~,.AC..:n::,vE.. f'rlVO A-E::.5 ~-n:-CAu--( f'LEA S D..J G 6 ~c.....JC. S P A c.. G. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole, (75L '-T" 'U::o. cOVV"\u.r c~c..~ PLEA5.;D.J(Q 11 C'- C-It .x: ns.C- 1V~ A t- o r=. S;:; e:......J Fa ~ 0 f-P:r;c.I::- s P ."1"(., f:.. i"lt0 /V\.A SO w R.- 'i B '-r~..DJe. 'v.-rs:- LL ~ D .~ PrS::P_ C F- f''CJ?-MPNJ.;,...Jef:: Tb '\'1it:.. ~ > 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole, , c"l<.:L:.6.i:' ... T p.r=:. - '\b U;.- 'i.-c:z....E- .S \-fu...J.....D ,vcS\ C. e:: e~'l1: ~JV\. ..DJ (U:: G'~"'S It) v t. i.-1"'C-Lv..I:>.....O <:) p- PE::.n €-S~ I!l-~P-rr. O'-CJ2. \-Mt..r TlTC:.. 13\..J::I:-l...-C :r:..:-J6~ .n,..JU':;J>r rS S Th Qk Go(=- .;- vJ~(....'- ,vo'\' G ~~ ntf... ~-E./) 'Fe c..- A-O prn::ou,::>tL- t" .~ D.JG S f' Pt c..f;..S . 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. ~E.. f-r JZ. 'jb !U -n:. r LoA f'.J 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. .v/A tv :::;7" vv r 1t"'1""iAJ ,\I-t"f:.,.. ~r';..ic... o ~S \'i"'~r..c:\ ~ Page 3 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMlr, ....LJIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-20 .' ~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; "e1 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 2S' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); r/ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study w ill be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o / SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): J.-. All dimensions; -2 North arrow; ---.L Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals SO feet), and date prepared; 2 Location map; 7" Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; 7 Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ~ All required setbacks; ./ All existing and proposed points of access; ./- All required sight triangles; ../ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen - trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; ,/ Location of all public and private easements; ~ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; '"7 Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; ./ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; ~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; ./ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per / Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; .../ Location of all landscape material; -/ Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; ---:-/ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; ---!<. /' Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and ;;r Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks "7 v ./ ~ ~ 2' .7 o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ~ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses ./ ;/ o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'h X 11) and color rendering if possible o FOR BEV!::LOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foofcontQu[~, or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if rE!quired JO evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; .. .. Location of all earth or water retaining walls"andearth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); 1\ U G ". '!' , Structural overhangs; -_ ,f.>, "; 1 d l u U . Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, c:3iiepy-(Elcip.lines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater r~ I G. r/ - - - - - - - - - - - - 7' ~ 0 . . LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBrIIll1 TAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.. ., LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y:. X 11) (color rendering if possible) IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) &' if' o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. crI BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials r:i' REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y:. X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. MJ G ! d i Uu Page 5 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. \ ~- _J r) - CL-vVY\ '~) (' n. rY\ Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~t:J..day of ~ . A.D. 20~ to me and/or by ";0 kn'h l)<_Cl.l'l . who is personally known has produced Fg L- 'D Son tt~ -50 y,iLl 0 as identification. ........\*~';I:;;:I,# Judy Lubitz t*rA'l'r;~ MY COMMISSION /I CC946717 EXPIRES ~'~i>l June 18, 2004 '.I~Rf.l~~~ BONDED TH~U TROY FAIN INSU~ANCE. tt>4c. tJ IG ~ ;~ :cUlL', Page 6 of 7 _ Rexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . ~~ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) I o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS L/fh S rn to an subscribed before me this ~ day of A.D. 2003 to me snd/or by . 'Who is personallv knowii) has as ---. Virginia M Costa April 4, 2007 8OIlDEO THRu TROY FAIN INIURANCE. INC (' (\ 'lnn') AU'l 1 t' D.": Page 6 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater . . n): a:::.,S,-,.(2:ee..T property; ce of a building permit, thorizes City day of rst duly sworn ~~~ M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: L~ 'i .t)~AA-I (Names of all property owners) t- J1) ,~ ~t-~ 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general locatio 9::55 LJl-v'.~_\.. I, .E- J#J f.j). ~. - h- . 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 6 ff::cCf:; v-. s;r n-t J)f.. a~C,J ".J'II -g~ ~ A- ~~..e.. CrkL 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: s .C 6(.....-, as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuan certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner au representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. Thot (I/we), ~e "",Ie""gned so"",rily, hereby ",rtily thot the fo,""o'ng is ~ ~ Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this I i AUtt"~ ,Zoo..3 personally appeared WWfZ.2:Me 1>. ~.AN who having been fi Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ~ Fl... PL D.5bD-3"~-~3-2~ My Commission Expires: R"':.l'- James ~ ~1.i. . ~. ; My ComtTIIUlOll 000.49138 otary ublic ~Of"'~ Expires August 12. 2005 S:\Ffanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive infi" application 2002.doc j. Ii:' fU,., Page 7 of 7 _ Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater An Equal OpportunIty Employer Thomas G. Dabney, II Chair, Sarasota Watson L Haynes, II Vice Chair, Pinellas Janet D. Kovach Secretary, Hillsborough Maggie N. Dominguez Treasurer, Hillsborough Edward W. Chance Manatee Ronnie E. Duncan Pinellas Pamela L Fentress Highlands Ronald C. Johnson Polk Heidi B. McCree Hillsborough T. G. . Jerry" Rice Pasco Judith C. Whitehead Hernando David L Moore Executive Director Gene A. Heath Assistant Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel Protecting Your Water Resources . Soutllwest Florida Water Management District ..~~ '... ~. ~g.._- .,~....~ --'-,...~t8W?-- . 2379 Broo~ .street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TOD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL oniy) SUNCOM 578-2070 Bartow Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 Lecanto Service Office 3600 West Sovereign Path Suite 226 Lecanto, Fiorida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 667-3271 August 8, 2003 Larry and Jo-Ann Dean 1856 Redcoat Lane Clearwater, FL 33764 Subject: Notice of Final Agency Action for Approval ERP General for Minor Systems Permit No. 46025445.000 Project Name: Larry Dean Painting County: Pinellas Secrrwp/Rge: 21/29S/15E Dear Mr. and Ms. Dean: This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action for approval of the permit application referenced above. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statute (F.S.), and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.A.G. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAC. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 400-1.1010, F.A.C., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. The enclosed approved construction plans are part of the permit, and construction must be in accordance with these plans. /-I'LI j (J' 11 "' ~\ .:-) ~~ U LL-~ . . Permit No.: 46025445.000 August 8, 2003 Page 2 If you have questions concerning the permit, please contact Abdul Waris, P.E., at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2053. For assistance with environmental concerns, please contact Shonda L. Worley, extension 2073. Sincerely, aafffJuW Alba E. Mas, P.E., Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM:AW:elb Enclosures: Approved Permit w/Conditions Attached Approved Construction Drawings Statement of Completion Notice of Authorization to Commence Construction Noticing Packet (42.00-039) Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAC. celene: File of Record 46025445.000 Michael J. Gaylor, P.E., Gaylor Engineering /liJh 1 .1 dH!:: _~uJ . . OCTOBER 9, 2003 BI)'8n Berry, Planner MWlicipaJ Services City of Clearwater Planning Dept. Deal Mr. Berry, This letter is to inform you that I am aware that the project at 935 Lakeview Road is to be used as office space and not as mixed uselresidential space. If you need anything else please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~.~~~~ ~o~~\ Larry and 10- Ann Dean 10 39\;1d S3SI~d~31N3 N\;I3G E1::LL SE:9U8 U:Z:l L551/;:1/i:0 . . A question was raised by one of the neighborhood residents that dealt with the question of paint disposal. Disposal is the last resort for a painting contractor. Preceding disposal of paint products comes source reduction, simply buying enough but not too much paint to do the job at hand. Many painting jobs use similar products and any left over paint can be used on another project. A second coat or just product left over for the homeowner to use are other viable options. Pinellas County also has a hazardous waste disposal site where used paint is often recycled. Painting contractors pay to drop off overage up to 4 times / year. A painting contractor might use this option if there is too much product (over half a gallon in a gallon can for instance) to dispose of For smaller quantities PinellasCounty would allow you to dispose of the paint in the waste stream by drying the product. This is accomplished by leaving the lid off the paint can and drying the paint out. Empty metal paint cans with a dry paint film are usually recyclable. A painting contractor could also dispose of paint by pouring a small quantity on cardboard or having it absorbed by kitty litter and then letting it dry in the sun until no liquid remains. The dried paint along with the different materials would then be put in a plastic bag and thrown away. At no time would paint be poured down the drain into the sewer system or out on the ground to contaminate the water table. These are serious infractions that common sense dictates is not acceptable. The small amount of latex paint remaining in a brush or roller is usually washed out with massive quantities of water that dilute any harmful substances. In the case of an oil based product, solvents such as mineral spirits are used to clean equipment or thin paint. Again it is preferable to use up the product. In the case of cleaning, mineral spirits are captured in a container with the residues from the brush. Rollers are usually allowed to dry and then thrown away. After a while the residues settle out of the mineral spirits and the mineral spirits can be reused. The oil residue which is left is left to dry and then disposed of as mentioned before. Again, no paint goes down the drain or into the ground. I hope this has helped explain why there should be no problem with excess paint when taken care of by a conscientious painting contractor. Larry Dean Larry Dean Painting Member ofPDCA (Painting and Decorating Contractors of America) ~-- CL WCoverSheet . . FLD2003-08036 935 LAKEVIEW RD Date Received: 08/18/2003 DEAN, LARRY ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 306A P~CEI\/FD E#: O' Planning Department ~"e...... "_I~, l... DATE RECEIVED: 100 South Myrtle Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff initial ): -L:!1 ~ Clealwater, Florida 33756 ,... 8 2003 ATLAS PAGE #: ~~ Telephone: 727-562-4567 AUb 1 ZONING DISTRICT: c:... Fax: 727-562-4865 O! l'IlI,1:';W"JG. Dr=rJl'RTME~ ~~~~~G~~~S~~~~A6~O:~J~~T I Lf,.\i""h ~ ........Irt"\ . PROPERTIES' o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPOt~F CLEt-\R:VVATE NORTH: ~ l>....s.~.;.( SOUTH:J~ ~~ WEST: d'""'\~~ EAST: ~-~ .i'!.~'eLU >- . ~b o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ~ ~ - * NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 11/05/02) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-use additional sheets as necessary A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: I ~ 'i D r ~ MAILING ADDRESS: j ~ S " {:Lf-nCD.Ff\ LA-tJi::... c ieaYloJe. ~fi- 3 31~+ E-MAIL ADDRESS:L-bE:.At-J.+Q..Tl..t-MP.q6A.i.t!.1!.. .($)M PHONE NUMBER: "12.. J - 53 b - 77:J. 3 C.f.\ u... i <;, T"Tl) MAKE:. CELL NUMBER: 7)...7- ~Cf;9.. - 4-03 ~ FAX NUMBER: '1'1./-Y31.c.-T123 S~ L..t:;~ ;c.S ~c.'i:... PROPERTY OWNER(S): LA Rfl.. 'i f::J f:: AN (Must include ALL owners) +- rO-A/Vtv bE:A~ AGENT NAME(S): IV /(). MAILING ADDRESS: E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 9 3 5" L f\ KE:. \J I-f::.vJ P.o A b j CL...E:.A.fa.v-JA-rc..e. . fL. L-O'- $ It 001: rt::o;J LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: 5'0 00 if1. (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: I .'" TO ~ -( 0 fY-x.c.f:.. Vv:I:. n-t a VoJ~ /~u P fllI-J1' l-:r:.. v..DJ6 Q uAt-\~ . (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) MC>S "\ 0 F- n+E::.. B u Z-LD J:.-Vo To (3(=. \J ,S EJJ ~ sn !<.A() t:.. . DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): p..fUluc...-P:::~ rAJ L-o T ~J::.z..f:.. I'WV'O Sf-:. T g ."\-c::..K.. ~E:.Gl~ME:J.J'\S. (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ~ f>A-j:tKDJG. 5I'ACE:..S. Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater I I T DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE T.RANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), ,EVIOUSL Y APPRbvEO]~~~D Q~l DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X- (if yes, attach a copy.of ttwi'c/WIidatiie documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) l"fT / tnc:'< . . ,.:/.;::'" rj El SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATfE5!fINGOWNERSHIP(Mle' ; \ page 6) ~. D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) ~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Tlt€:JUi:. IS f>rf'-J E.Q.v~\.Nh...c....I\ S~-z...E:.l) 6(-n:-<:.../:;.. B~rub T\\ Tl-tf:.. \J'ooIE:. &1 dF MY DfF.rcE... I"r/Vll A MU,-" ::1::-- ~'x.,--{ Oc '-'6 ~p ME:.,..J'( ..,.-0 T"lt'C- EASI" 'Tl-+-A< RtorJ\' i-Pt ;e&-..ES'v..J ,-:)J THf:.. ~.,A A.IlJ:-. BvZ~l)a.>6. \. n~ IM-ve. 0 K~c....S S.pik.E:. o~ ntf;:. i 51'" ft.u.:.IL. + ~uD-J(. M-F-.Af Alb....c 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. L M.--I f!Z-ofbH:..o o(-{"-S:C1:.- _C-o,vDO v-Du~ BE:.. c.olV\'p~w:;;.. (HZ.. A...t~t'.)vE.. \"l'tC VAi.-V~ of- l..-r~ fl~r ~ TIcS T:.J.,..J T11'f:. t+J!...E:.A . M. "'1 3v :z::.t....;D7:Jo,.J{', ::c.s IV\ASi.>.V P- -tv...Jl~ i-l v..Cu.....o ffZ...el ~ A-S!:,L-f A-W~Sf::. ~b~ ~ T"'ftE:. s rE:..E-L o-K-rc.f-_ BLl..D. TO -n1f:. VVe=SI'. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. N'-'f u.i E:-- of- \1*:. B-.I.t:.l..ol} ~ b 00(;5 ,t1-01'"' I)..JC-U.JDl=... /H.J1 i+A-1..A" CVI u~ AC T:C.v.r-o::E:-~ ,Z'-.:t:S 1"1\ 6(- uS(:.-...J) F\2. ~f-{-2:.u:=.1 i-X-~ t:.. o...v.A..Jtrl=.2.<:; n ~ 1"lf"\::. or (. 'JP~. ~Gc. S1l)jZA66... A-fl.f=A. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ftS n~Sx;:..bf-J~ ~ S~c.J-....o 6E::. M'OJ~A-l- T"1t.A1"""""'!:c. C,oJ..JGes ~~ c.vS~ Cft,.V E:7vf(::.2. r E:~:t:\ (-;Z.c~ -n~ fA.(L.V'~G. AU:A (~v-NeP.. / Ou...-upAJUl" ~ USE:. ntf:. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. vr:.c~..K'" of- M.-{ ~S-r.J.:) ~ + F-f:.~L. BV.J:<-Q DJ6,S J:j...J Tl't'C :J.MME:JlJ:JtfE:. PlZ-o \' u'; r 1\ 0 f:..vG- (....()(J M~ . n+c::R..E. A..a.Ji. 0 fi""C c.f:::. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. .'V--t. 0 ~ I c..o~ t) v..J 11 '...)<...0 Nc.rr P a..f:. 'i) ~ Pw-Jr Nf--c;" ~ .'DV\PAC,.... 'TO i11C ~ . i1UJF-) O~ OPr:-~L.J v-O'...JUJ Bt=. OA'"1r.D-\,=- OWf....-t. .ntf:. 6v-r:.ua.Ju.I:-S TO 6E:::.. uSF-.D ~€- Sn~G.c -t OA-' Qt:r-c:c::..f:. vsE.. IVO J\..of:.&ITT1=-'-'€:- fK-c)uSn::-L 1 a-\-yJr-<:"'1l)~-t ae. V J:..s.~nrt.- 1:M.P ~c...z:. ~ ,+T'E: " Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. X 1'k....F.J:J n1f::. w\" s:::.~ ~E:...Ou'-"l"1=<l,J r Sf='T!!J,^,"(.K ~-J),..j(_~ D...J aRJ>.':::R. -rn B'J~uJ) AA..J ~ \J J:: l.-A OJ (5. Rk--O ;,J C \"'+:-6J...J r:JJ v . ~ . r:r' T'1) ~ C ~'- PuD-..x.. c....- O""Pclge 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater r-;.' the development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.} /IA'f 0 f?f:cG.{C:04JDo. v.,Joul.-D ar::. c..oMf'AJ2-A.lkG. D.J vAL-VE:.-ro SvRJ:Z.o....,vVl)...IG Pl2-of'f::fi-'Tl:.CS. Tl1E 1/2.0'T'€-c.., v.J\"'r'6J CClM.fLE. '\""E.... vJOv~O (\1:::.- \M)Q..;.nt ~S f.: T"t) .$ i 00 J 000 . C.C I 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. T1tC1Z.L::. A-P-E:- (H_~""t o~c.f::. A+A> P-..CS1:O~ Of:.vG-LofMGJJi DJ n+e;... ~ ~ ~~(~ u"'l::-~ ~ ALSO f'CJ2..M.:r...'\T"E:D r,..J~ c.r....-t of- c.~~ . 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Iltf::JUi:- 1::.$ M u(..... -r:c ~ r 1..:-( J S-:i>JG ~ f=A.M.::r:i... 'i J 0 Fr--rr ~) R.E=- ~L- .... Lr'C. rt"'f"' MA+JV~C.TV~DJG -DJ ~ ~-A A~"'-{ . /V'...., .p~o('oS€:D v5(;:. Or o~c..E:. -r(}v..J~ OCLV.PAIU'J"" l..:Lvs;...sG. v..Jo'J-D BG. c.ofV\.P~LE.. ~.Pi\-t O~S C-V~ uSE-. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 1: 1+A~ /J01' B~.1EJJ A-GL-f::.. T\) ~JVl) A SDv\.t:lJ.li2 S.r1'"'"E... ~ "^("~ "^-"'t tvf1:.A S AS ~ sX.c Of} (;;5" A ,-.:n-tu v 6 \-t ntf=- ...., MA- 'i. 136. A ~L.A.J\i h.- ... 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. TIt€.. PA-F-C-c L Pr-r Tl'f'1::S lJ:Mf., rs vA '-A-f'JI" L-AvvO ~ v (' G ,'0\-0 E:. -n+<:.. A r::. 5 ,-,;.. -n:. CA u.... -t 1:MME:..O ~ rL.E.ASDJG u ~ C-rA! r.T"""( f\-( /'ft'1::. PR..lJPo~G.D I'lZ-OJ'Eu p l2-(>vJ:O DJ 6 A-~1"'X.'VG.. v....J'O VL.n 6 ~c....lC. $PAc..G. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ~.... P~O:rE: ,-, E:.vH-.4.i'J<..c::.S ~ co.~urJ:r.-r-t c:~c..T1=-.-e.. ~<J6H A f'-EA$:p.JG:. A (',Colt .J:1'G.c.. TV~ ~L- o IS S:L:C3.....J Fa~ 0 F-f1:r f, S PJ'tC f;.. . ~ MA So IJ R. '1 B v-:t:-I.-:O:DJ6 ~LL f>N:)O ."'WJ ~ of- f'~&--JCk- Tb ~ ~, 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 'T11<:- fl.-e'7<.1:.6.I:LrT, -:r:>.J Rf::.6A..f.L'l "\1) L()";"' ~c:z.r~ i'hvO SCrBAc..~ .S HC.oJ~ NO; ~ elZd~ J:)J ttf: <;; A.LO S' .11:1 v t. \--t"C c..v<...AJ) () Po. f'f:.Q E oS ~ rfUtr-f=.P>r.1' . O~ I-ML-F T"tK::. 13'..J:t-l-O:t:.tJ65, .~ J::S SIDf2k&(- +.",Jr.-(....l- ~D-T;" G ~J!..SH""f:. ntf...;'Vf=--E/) fil2.... A-OprTl:oI-IAL. f' 1~n.JG .5 P~c..f:..S . 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. p..E.. ~ OTh $i:t T"f'o f I.-A tV 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. .v/A NO, vv.r n-t:OJ ~ A-{? (';'..JE:.. o I:S ~-:t:e\ ~ Page 3 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearw ater ~ "'\r" ~ ~ 1::. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMIT.REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-2. i:uI"SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; ci ~ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o / SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): -L. All dimensions; -2 North arrow; ..L Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; =z Location map; 1 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _"':.. Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; 7 Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; .z:, All required setbacks; ~ All existing and proposed points of access; ~ All required sight triangles; v Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen - trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; ./ Location of all public and private easements; --:)' Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ~ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; .,/ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; ~ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; ,/ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per / Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; -./ Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; ~ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; ,/ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and /" Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks 2' .-:L --L -L -L 2' 2' .",,/ -.L o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ~ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 * X 11) and color rendering if possible o Fb~J;.~OPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foo~ or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevationsirii;qt:Kreclto evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; -..-----....... Location of all earth or water retaining waflS"ane..earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ---~-.....-.._ Streets and drives (dimensioned); ----.-... Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); .....--.~---- AUG 8 '/UU Structural overhangs; _______ 1 L Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified a rborist" , of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, cariopYimip,lines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater d G. ,LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBIII, I AL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-110 1 '" o LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y:. X 11) (color rendering if possible) IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21 ) IJ! ~ o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. di BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials ~ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y:. X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:. X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ~,UG 1 d LUU3 Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINElLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this ~t:J..day of ~ A.D. 20~ to me and/or by .Jo frnlf\ 1)<",.., . who is personally known has produced F 0 L. '0 Son 4~ 60 '674 0 as identification. In- ~ Cl~ ~0n-~ Signature of property owner or representative 1,'1111", J l' .~lf.'.y.fiit... . udy ubltz ~*(~"'a MY COMMISSION # CC946717 EXPIRES ~.~~o June 18, 2004 '4t,iitr;~"'" BONDED THRU T~OV FAIN INSU~ANCf.INC. AIIG ~ 8 LUU3 'T Page 6 of 7 - Aexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater G~ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) , o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS /L/fh S rn to an subscribed before me this --I- day of A.D. 20~ to me 2ng/or by . IIil1ho is oersonallv knoloVii) has as VlfQinio M Costa April 4, 2007 aoNDEO THRU TROY FAIN INIURANa, INC. ,. AUG 1 8 2003 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of ciearwater . . . - M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: - LA-J!.P.. -{ ~f...AAJ t- J1) ,A.Jt.-tO.-l ~f-~ (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 9~S ~I ~JJoJ U. . ~. fi.. 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 6 F-H:'cJ:; ~ 4s-s:;o &J"'A1 vgE::..- 1AJ A- ~.M..f-..e. c. TJt-t... a::.S'~<:.T S c 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: e.(...., as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true ~nd net. II ~ -r. Property owner,) l. Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this l'il day of Ac1fttlJf" ,-z..~.3 personally appeared ~~Me 1:>. bt=:M who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. S ,Ai. Fl- PL 0 .51>0- J"'~- 3 -l~ My Commission Expires: ';/:) James ~r ~"'i. 'CJ..#'-CJ . .; My COIl1Il1IUlOll 00049138 otary ublic '\;.,,,, Expires August 12. 2005 S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive infill application 2002.doc t Ii i i,\ [Uc oj Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater An Equal Opportunity Employer Thomas G. Dabney, II Chair, Sarasota Watson L. Haynes, II Vice Chair, Pinellas Janet D. Kovach Secretary, Hillsborough Maggie N. Dominguez Treasurer, Hillsborough Edward W. Chance Manatee Ronnie E. Duncan Pinellas Pamela L. Fentress Highlands Ronald C. Johnson Polk Heidi B. McCree Hillsborough T. G. "Jerry" Rice Pasco Judith C. Whitehead Hernando David L. Moore Executive Director Gene A. Heath Assistant Executive Director William S. Bllenky General Counsel Protecting Your Water Resources Sout~est Florida Water Management District 2379 Br.treet, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TOD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org Tampa Service Office 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-836-0797 (FL oniy) SUNCOM 578-2070 Bartow Service Office 170 Century Boulevard Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 (863) 534-1448 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 Sarasota Service Office 6750 Fruitville Road Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 (941) 377-3722 or 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) SUNCOM 531-6900 Lecanto Service Office 3600 West Sovereign Path Suite 226 Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (352) 527-8131 SUNCOM 667-3271 August 8, 2003 Larry and Jo-Ann Dean 1856 Redcoat Lane Clearwater, FL 33764 Subject: Notice of Final Agency Action for Approval ERP General for Minor Systems Permit No. 46025445.000 Project Name: Larry Dean Painting County: Pinellas Secrrwp/Rge: 21/29S/15E Dear Mr. and Ms. Dean: This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action for approval of the permit application referenced above. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statute (F.S.), and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code (FAC.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, FAG. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAC. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 40D-1.1010, FAC., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. The enclosed approved construction plans are part of the perm it, and construction must be in accordance with these plans." AUG 1 8 LU!J3 . Permit No.: 46025445.000 . August 8, 2003 Page 2 . If you have questions concerning the permit, please contact Abdul Waris, P.E., at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2053. For assistance with environmental concerns, please contact Shonda L. Worley, extension 2073. Sincerely, aar;~ Alba E. Mas, P.E., Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM:AW:elb Enclosures: Approved Permit wlConditions Attached Approved Construction Drawings Statement of Completion Notice of Authorization to Commence Construction Noticing Packet (42.00-039) Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAC. cc/enc: File of Record 46025445.000 Michael J. Gaylor, P.E., Gaylor Engineering AtJfJ 1 K LU1I3 CL WCoverSheet . . FLD2003-08036 935 LAKEVIEW RD Date Received: 8/18/2003 DEAN.. LARRY ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 306A PAID :~ ~;3 : r~:-n::~-Il w. rn r'~' '';1 ,.-... ! III AUG 1 8 2003 lJ1J f'&.AIiNIN & DEVELOPMENT SVC~ CllY Of CLEARWATER g ~ ~ 0'\ 00 <;! ...... r- Oo ;I: 00 f"j t--- = QC) = = = = =('f') == == =~ =00 =~ f"jOO == = .. M~ ~ = ~ .. =1:1: ...... Q" ... ~ CJ ~ ~ '1:l .; ~ .... = = ~ < = Z = 8 Co> < ~ al ~ ~ -; 'n I = 0 .sa u a <I) .C :0 Co> '~ ~ <I) ~ ~ ~ '1:l = U = .. .. """ Eo-< 0 = z ;.; ~ e .. ~ u .... .... ~ = ::s o ~ on o ("'I. ...... N 1.0 N ...... """ r'l I o ...... o 1.0 r'l o 00 o I r'l o o N Cl .....:l ~ o o .n o l't .... ~ -; .... = Eo-< e ~ .... .... ~ = ::s . <Ii .... = <I) 8 ~ ~ .... = = ~ < '1:l ~ > .~ Co> ~ ~ ~ = = z e .. '== = = u = z .... = = = Co> Co> < = Z .::Ill = .. =:I ~ ~ Cl ! ~ '1:l = .= t: ~ o 0 o 0 tri .n o 0 C"i "t ...... .... ~ . --r") = :.'";:) '-I ':0 ,- (..!:) =:l <( ~ o en .... <I) ~ ~ .... -; .... = E-t .... = e >> .. ~ N ...... on ~ u ] U c: o :;::; .~ 0. 0. ctI Q) ~ '0 Q) E o .u :!::"S E 0 Co Q) o.~ ctI 0 ....- . .g gj I-c:" :iE .Q Q) r:t::1tjt;:: Wu"'" 11.=0 <( 0. c: I-g-~ Oc:- zctl= en"" 3= _0:;, en:: 0 -0.>- :::J: .- " I-Q)c: U ctI l!:!" ctI Q) .!Q ~ .!Q .S; ~l!:! Q) .0 ~ .s. " <) ~ <) c..., o <I) ~ 0... ~ c: o ~ ,~ 0.. 0. ctI .!Q ..c: I- Thank you for your continued interest in the City of Clearwater! Sincerely, JY~tC Brian J. Aungst Mayor Cc: City Commission Members Official Records and Legislative Services City Attorney's Office Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director Bryan Berry, Planner II ~~~ 2. '7 IGGq .,..T',,., . .'t\~~LOF 'lit '...... ~{~ \)...,.u..........~~_ \~~.,J ........-'7~ ..ll;:-:;',\ \ I, ~';. c>.. "",~\.........' ~ ,-" ~ --- '" ~~:L~' . 'I ",C"':t. =""C, <", r::- - -",'" '"'-4':. ,~~'" f:)ll ..~. ~ - "'-~ ~. ..~~.:==- .,~,:\ ~ 7;-;r--."" ~\ ~- ryJ. ~~T." ~Vt\;~ .........)1TE~,... · "".1 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 CI1Y HALL, 112 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4050 FAX (727) 562-4052 Cny COUNCIL May 21,2004 Mr. W.A. Infinger 2231 Sequoia Drive Clearwater, FL 33763-7803 Dear Mr. Infinger: Thank you for your letter dated April 12, 2004. You have expressed concerns that ask for clarification. The following concerns will also be addressed in bullets: 1. The zoning of the 900 block of Lakeview Road took place with the adoption of the new Community Development Code on January 21, 1999. This was adopted after several interviews and meeting with City staff and numerous public interest groups showed their support. The new Code took effect on March 8, 1999. 2. The Official Records and Legislative Services (formerly known as the Clerk's Office) is responsible for public hearing notifications. Since the City as a whole was effected by the new Community Development Code, the Official Records and Legislative Services department was required to only post the notices in the newspaper. There was a minimum of two notices posted, if not more, for this change prior to the Code adoption. This major change to the City's entire zoning code was widely publicized throughout the City. If you have further questions regarding this information, you may contact the Official Records and Legislative Services at (727) 562-4093. 3. The appellants must request and be approved party status at the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting in order to file an appeal. The Dempsey residents did voice their opposition at the meeting; however, they did not request party status at the meeting. For further information regarding this, you may contact The City Attorney's Office at (727) 562-4010. 4. The City recognizes the statements made by the Chairman of the CDB and we will note your concern. 5. The previous zoning of Professional Services (PS) is one of many prior zoning districts that were rezoned to a new applicable Community Development Code zoning designation, therefore, that dated zoning designation no longer exists. If you have further questions regarding the flexible development, case number FLD2003- 08036, you may contact Bryan Berry, Planner II, of the Planning Department at (727) 562-4553. BRIAN r AlINGST, MAYOR hANK IIIBBARD, VICE MAYOR BILL JOi'SON, COLINCIDIE~IHER * lion IlA~IILTON, COl:\iCII.:\lE~IBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, Con';CIL~IE\IBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E~lPLOYER" r----- - It e ,,""'1, ,'~f.'\/ OFTII( '....# \.~ ~~",,~;:-- ,,\!',,""j ~""~':.. ~;:-,;.~ \ I .. ~ <:;,;'" ~-i~'r-C ,. .... ~ ~ ~~: ==0=.-..~: ..~~::c_ ~~.. ..:?~,-- .'(",.'~\ ";.~r..~';#;';""'~~.\\ ........## ~E~t .,,' "111'" CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PlANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FI.ORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 February 20, 2004 Mr. Larry Dean 1856 Redcoat Lane Clearwater, FL 33764 RE: Development Order regarding Case FLD2003-08036 at 935 Lakeview Drive Dear Mr. Dean: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 23, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to permit a reduction in the minimum lot area from 5,000 square feet to 4,920 square feet, a reduction in the lot width from 50 feet to 49 feet, a reduction in the front (north) setback along Lakeview Road from 25 feet to four feet (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and five feet (to building), the front (south) setback along Dempsey Street from 25 feet to 12 feet (to building), and the side (west) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement) and four feet (to building), as a Comprehensive fufill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C and a reduction in the perimeter landscape buffer requirements from 10 feet to four feet along Lakeview Road, the side (east) setback from five feet to four feet, and the side (west) setback from five feet to two feet as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive fufill Redevelopment Project criteria per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all future signage will require a permit for approval; 2. That no residential unit be included in building construction plans; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by CDB; BRIAr-: .I. Al 'r-:CST, MAY< lR-C\ lMMISSI( lr-:EI{ III))T I l:1111 I.T( l~, VICE MAYOI{-COM\lISSIO!':EI{ \'\'IIITNEY CHIY, Co.I!.IIISS\( l:\I.1{ FR.\!':K IlIIlJlAlnl. CIl.ltMISSIONEH * BI1.1.JOI'SOI', CIl\I\IISSlm,;m "E()l JAI. EMPI.OYMENT A?\Jl Al'l'mMATIVE Acn( l?\ E\tPU lYEI{" e e February 20, 2004 Dean - Page Two 4. That all traffic impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 5. That there be no outside storage or display of materials overnight; 6. That all future uses be limited to a low traffic generating office with similar operational characteristics; and 7. That the approval shall be tied to the application and supporting documents and any change thereto shall require review and approval by the Community Development Board. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (February 17, 2005). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, please be aware that under the provisions of Section 4-502.B. an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated by the applicant or any person granted party status with regards to the property (which is the subject of the approval) within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on March 2, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Bryan Berry, Planner at 727-562-4539. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: htto:/ /www.myc1earwater-fl.coml. Very truly yours, CynthiaH.Tarapani,AICP Planning Director E:\Plaming Departm:ntlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next CDBlLakeview 935 Dean (C)1Lakeview 935 DEVEWPMENT ORDER.doc . . CDB Meeting Date: February 17. 2004 Case Number: FLD2003-08036 Agenda Item: D2 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT UPDATE: This case was continued from the October 21, 2003 Community Development Board meeting due to site design. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan removing the driveway access onto Dempsey Street, removing the drainage swale located along the east property line, placing a drain inlet on the concrete drive and parking area, and has increased the side (west) setback from one foot (to building) to four feet (to building). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: OWNER: Larry and Jo-Ann Dean APPLICANT: Larry Dean LOCATION: 935 Lakeview Road REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a reduction in the minimum lot area from 5,000 square feet to 4,920 square feet, a reduction in the lot width from 50 feet to 49 feet, a reduction in the front (north) setback along Lakeview Road from 25 feet to four feet (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and five feet (to building), the front (south) setback along Dempsey Street from 25 feet to 12 feet (to building), and the side (west) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement) and four feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C and a reduction in the perimeter landscape buffer requirements from 10 feet to four feet along Lakeview Road, the side (east) setback from five feet to four feet, and the side (west) setback from five feet to two feet as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. PLANS REVIEWED: Site plans prepared by Gaylor Engineering. SITE INFORMATION: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.11 acres; 4,791 square feet Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-08032- Page 1 . . DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 49 feet of width by 97 feet of depth PROPERTY USE: Current use: Proposed use: Vacant lot Office PLAN CATEGORY: CG, Commercial General Classification ZONING DISTRICT: C, Commercial District ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Residential West: Office East: Residential South: Residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The vicinity is predominately residential to the north and south. To the east and west of the parcel is commercially zoned property with residential and office buildings. Older homes that are currently zoned commercial and being converted into small professional office uses define the character. ANALYSIS: The 0.1 I-acre site is located on the south side of Lakeview Road, approximately 100 feet west of Ewing Avenue. The parcel has two frontages, one along Lakeview Road and a second along Dempsey Street. It is comprised of lots five and six, block I, of the "Lake Belleview Addition" plat. The parcel is located within a strip of commercially zoned properties that divide Lakeview Road and Dempsey Street. It is currently vacant and undeveloped, with an existing concrete drive located in the northeast comer. The applicant has proposed to construct a 1,179 square foot building to serve as an office for his painting business. The office will provide space to store equipment and meet with potential clients. All work activities will take place at designated sites based on the clients' request. The proposed hours of operation will be from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. The proposed site plan has one point of ingress / egress located on Lakeview Road. This point of access will be a 24-foot driveway. The proposed office building will have a garage door located on the north building fa9ade. This will allow the applicant to enter, store, and exit the parcel. A reduction in the amount of parking from 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet to 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the office use is proposed. Due to existing lot dimensions, a reduction in side setbacks to pavement is necessary for the parking to meet the City parking standards, while also maintaining a 24- foot drive isle for the public to enter and exit the parking lot. The setback reduction requests are found to be compatible with current Commercial zoning and the established neighboring setback patterns. The two lots comprising this parcel were platted in Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-08032- Page 2 . . 1925. The lot dimensions of 1925 differ greatly from the current code requirements of today and relief from the minimum development standards can be justified. The existing Commercial zoning for the property permits an office use. An office use located within a Commercial District is a less intensive use than other types of uses that could be permitted within the district and is compatible with a residential neighborhood. The applicant has shown the adjacent property on the east to have a 1.5-foot setback from property line to building. The applicant has documented on the site plan that signage is to be attached to the fayade. It will be less than 4.5 square feet and will not be illuminated. The applicant will be notified that a separate permit is required for signage. CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES: There are no existing Code Enforcement violations. A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARDS IN THE C, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-701.1): STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? FLOOR AREA 0.55 Undeveloped lot .26 Yes RATIO IMPERVIOUS 0.95 Undeveloped lot 0.76 Yes SURFACE RATIO DWELLING 24 Undeveloped lot 0 Yes UNITS PER ACRE B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (Section 2- 704): STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN REQUIRED COMPLIANCE? LOT AREA N/A 4,920 square feet 4,920 square feet Yes (minimum) LOT WIDTH N/A 49 feet 49 feet Yes (minimum) FRONT N/A Vacant lot North: Four feet Yes SETBACK to pavement off Lakeview Ave.; South: 10 feet to building off Dempsey Street REAR N/A N/A N/A N/A Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-08032- Page 3 . . SETBACK SIDE N/A Vacant lot East: Five feet to Yes SETBACK pavement and building; West: Two feet to pavement and four foot to building HEIGHT N/A N/A 19 feet Yes maximum PARKING Determined by N/A 4 spaces (3 / Yes SPACES the Comm. Dev. 1,000 square minimum Dir. based on the feet) specific use C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (Section 2-704.C): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The two lots comprising the parcel were platted in 1925 as part of the "Lake Belleview Addition." The dimensions of the parcel are a width of 49 feet and depth of 97 feet. The amount of square footage, together with the existing Commercial Zoning District, create an impractical parcel for development without relief from the development standards. The proposed office will be a less intense use than others permitted by the Commercial Zoning District. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive Inlill Redevelopment Project, will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. According to the 2002 Pinellas County Property Appraiser records, the current value of the land is $25,500.00. The proposed improvements to the land will bring the property to a value around $100,000.00. Many of the surrounding homes have deteriorated over the years. By removing a vacant parcel from the neighborhood and constructing a new office building, this should have a positive impact on abutting property values. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Inlill Redevelopment Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed Office use is permitted within the Commercial Zoning District. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Inlill Redevelopment Project are Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17,2004 - Case FLD2003-08032- Page 4 . . compatible with adjacent land uses. Many of the surrounding parcels contain older, deteriorated buildings and homes. Adjacent land uses to the north and south are a mixture of residential duplexes and triplexes. The land uses to the east and west are largely professional offices and some older residential homes. The proposed office use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The predominant characteristics of the surrounding vicinity are older homes that have deteriorated over the years. This development will help to establish a precedent and upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function, which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed design helps to build upon the current changing form and function along Lakeview Road from older, deteriorating residential homes that are being converted or remodeled into newer office uses in conjunction with the underlying Commercial zoning. D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY(Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed office building will be aI, 179 square foot structure located on a 4,971 square foot lot. The adjacent lot to the east has two separate one-story buildings totaling 1,672 square feet on a 5,009 square feet lot. The Floor Area Ratio is greater for the adjacent lot to the east in scale and coverage than the proposed site. The proposed development will also be in harmony with the transitional Commercial/Residential character of neighboring properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed Office use is in conformance with the designated Commercial Zoning District. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage neighboring property Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-08032- Page 5 . . owners from maximizing the potential economic or intrinsic value for each property. The development should have a positive impact on neighboring property values based on the improvements to the land. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed use and development will have no adverse health or safety affects on the persons residing or working within the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed office building will have one garage door located on the north building fa9ade. This will allow the applicant to enter, store, and exit the parcel while towing paint related equipment. All of the proposed parking stalls and driveway are designed to City standards. The very nature of this office use will draw minimal traffic to the surrounding area. s. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The current community character is evolving from the older, deteriorating residential homes to being renovated and remodeled into professional office uses. This is taking place along the strip of Commercially Zoned properties that separate Lakeview Road from Dempsey Street. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed office building is designed to serve strictly as an office use. The physical work for the applicant takes place at client locations. There will be no acoustic and visual effects to adjacent properties. The hours of operation will be from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application on December 23, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development to permit a reduction in the minimum lot area from 5,000 square feet to 4,920 square feet, a reduction in the lot width from 50 feet to 49 feet, a reduction in the front (north) setback along Lakeview Road from 25 feet to four feet (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and five feet (to building), the front (south) setback along Dempsey Street from 25 feet to 12 feet (to building), and the side (west) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement) and four feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C and a reduction in the perimeter landscape buffer requirements from 10 feet to four feet along Lakeview Road, the side (east) setback from five feet to four feet, Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-08032- Page 6 e e and the side (west) setback from five feet to two feet as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G., with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria, per Section 2-704.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria, under Section 3- 913. 3. The improvements are compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all future signage will require a permit for approval; 2. That no residential unit be included in building construction plans; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by CDB; 4. That all traffic impact fees be paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 5. That there be no outside storage or display of materials overnight; 6. That all future uses be limited to a low traffic generating office with similar operational characteristics; and 7. That the approval shall be tied to the application and supporting documents and any change thereto shall require review and approval by the Community Development Board. Prepared by Planning Deparbnent staff: ~~ Bryan Be , Planner ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\Pending cases I Up for the next DRCILakeview Rd. 935 - DeanILakeview 935 STAFF REPORT. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - February 17, 2004 - Case FLD2003-08032- Page 7 e - CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 Cny HALL, 112 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4050 FAX (727) 562-4052 March 15, 2004 CIlY COMMISSION W.A. Fred Infinger 2231 Sequoia Drive Clearwater, FL 33763-1140 r-'."--'~ . r 0:3 Dear Mr. Infinger: Thank you for your letter dated F6btbary 24, 2004, related to building construction without permits and zoning inquiries. A short summary for each item is as follows: . 839 Lakeview Road: Our computer system does not show permits pulled for the remodeling of this property. We will open a case and send an inspector to examine the premises. . 921 Lakeview Road: Our computer system does not show any permit pulled for the remodeling/repair of this building. We will open a case for this property and send an inspector to examine the premises. . 935 Lakeview Road: A portion of the building was demolished in 1999. Pertaining to the concern about electrical being shared by an extension cord from the main building to the building addition, we will need to send an inspector to examine the property. Therefore, we will open a case for this property. . 937 Lakeview Road: Our computer system doesn't show any activity on this property. If they are remodeling or adding a structure to the building, this too will need to be inspected; therefore, we will open a case for this property. . 939 Lakeview Road: According to the property appraiser's office, this property is listed as rental property. As our computer system doesn't show an active Occupational License for Rental, this may be in violation of our City Code of Ordinances. This is being assigned to our Residential Rental Inspector for further investigation. . 941/943 Lakeview Road: There is an old case in the system dated August 29, 1996, for an abandoned vehicle, which was removed from the premises. This case was closed due to completion. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" - e All addresses on Dempsey Street are zoned SFR - Single Family Residential, with the exception of 806 Dempsey. The Planning Department, Zoning Division, can assist you further with these types of questions and may be reached at 562-4567 extension 4604, or you may contact Mr. Frank Gerlock, Planning Manager, at 562-4557. If you need further assistance with Building and/or Permitting questions please contact Mr. Kevin Garriott, Building Official, at 562-4588. I sincerely appreciate the interest you have taken in the economic welfare to the City, and we hope you continue to contribute in our attempts to make Clearwater "sparkle". Sincerely, '~d.lJ-~ Brian J. Aungst Mayor cc: Jeff Kronschnabl, Development & Neighborhood Services Director Kevin Garriott, D&NS Building Official Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director Frank Gerlock, Planning Manager . . CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 CITY HAll, 112 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4010 FAX (727) 562-4021 CITY ArrORNEY'S OFFICE March 18,2004 Mr. Michael Matheny 915 Dempsey Street Clearwater, Florida 33756-3405 FILE rL.t>2-0C13- of,o 3 G::, Re: Appeal of CDB Decision, 935 Lakeview Dear Mr. Matheny, The City of Clearwater Planning Department referred your telephone call to me. From the information I have, as a neighboring property owner you attempted to file an appeal of the Community Development Board's approval in the above-referenced case. Community Development Code Section 4-502B. provides that only the applicant or any person granted party status may file an appeal from such decisions. Per the Planning Department, the notice sent out to surrounding property owners notes that party status must be requested. As you were not a person granted party status by the Community Development Board, your appeal was considered not properly filed. The Official Records and Legislative Services Department should be returning to you the check that you submitted. ~~ YOU~(] /J2 $Z [eshe K. ~g~~' Assistant City Attorney c: Pamela K. Akin, City Attorney Cyndi Tarapani, Planning Director Susan Chase, Official Records and Legislative Services MAl< 1!) 11104 BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . for administrative purposes) at 1320 Ft. Harrison Ave., Belleair, Blk 24, Lot 1-2 & vac alley on W, Lots 3,4 & 5 & E 1/2 ofvac alley. FLD2003-12066 7. Ilhan Bill!utav (Pat Sheppard) is requesting a flexible development approval to permit construction of 2 medical clinic offices with building A totaling 7,985 sq ft and building B totaling 8,488 sq ft along with reductions to the front (southeast) setback along Lakeview Rd from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) under the provision of Section 2-1004.C. (Proposed Use: 2 medical clinic offices totaling 16,473 sq ft) at 720 Lakeview RdS..B 21-29-15, M&B 14.21. FLD2003-12067 8. Marlee A. Winner is requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction to lot size from 5,000 sq ft to 4,040 sq ft, a reduction in the side (south) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the front (west) setback to 3 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the side (north) setback to .9 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the rear (east) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in required parking from 15 spaces per 1,000 sq ft to zero for a restaurant and to permit 3 dwelling units above as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Restaurant and 3 residential units) at 395 Mandalav Ave., Barbour-Morrow Sub., Blk A, par t of Lot 21 & all of Lot 22. FLD2003-12070 9. Valhalla Properties / John Rich are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a medical clinic with reductions to parking from 42 spaces to 29 spaces, a reduction of the front setback from 25 feet to 17 feet (to building), a reduction in the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to the dumpster enclosure), a reduction in the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), and a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 14 feet (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line (no continuous hedge along property perimeter provided), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Change of use from an existing 8,072 square foot social center building to a medical clinic) at 407 N. Belcher Rd., Sec. 07-29-16, M&B 33.11. FLD2004-02007 10. Josee Goudreault is requesting an appeal of a Level One application (Flexible Standard Development case FLS2003- 12066) that requires the building be repainted a neutral color, under the provisions of Section 4-501. (Proposed Use: An existing building that has been painted light purple [main portion of the exterior of a building] and dark purple [base of the building and trim]) at 24 N. Ft. Harrison Ave., Earl & Tate's Sub., N 43 ft of Lots 12 & 13. APP2004-00001 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk Lisa FierceFPlanning Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 . . for administrative pwposes) at 1320 Ft. Harrison Ave., Belleair, Elk 24, Lot 1-2 & vac alley on W, Lots 3,4 & 5 & E 1/2 of vac alley. FLD2003-12066 7. I1han Bill!utav (Pat Sheppard) is requesting a flexible development approval to permit construction of 2 medical clinic offices with building A totaling 7,985 sq ft and building B totaling 8,488 sq ft along with reductions to the front (southeast) setback along Lakeview Rd from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and the side (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) under the provision of Section 2-1004.C. (Proposed Use: 2 medical clinic offices totaling 16,473 sq ft) at 720 Lakeview Rd., Sec. 21-29-15, M&B 14.21. FLD2003-12067 8. Marice A. Winner is requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction to lot size from 5,000 sq ft to 4,040 sq ft, a reduction in the side (south) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the front (west) setback to 3 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the side (north) setback to .9 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in the rear (east) setback to .5 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction in required parking from 15 spaces per 1,000 sq ft to zero for a restaurant and to permit 3 dwelling units above as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Restaurant and 3 residential units) at 395 Mandalav Ave., BaBB-Morrow Sub., Elk A, par t of Lot 21 & all of Lot 22. FLD2003-12070 9. Valhalla Properties / John Rich are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a medical clinic with reductions to parking from 42 spaces to 29 spaces, a reduction of the front setback from 25 feet to 17 feet (to building), a reduction in the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to the dumpster enclosure), a reduction in the side (north) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to building), and a reduction of the rear setback from 20 feet to 14 feet (to pavement) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line (no continuous hedge along property perimeter provided), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Change of use from an existing 8,072 square foot social center building to a medical clinic) at 407 N. Belcher Rd., Sec. 07-29-16, M&B 33.11. FLD2004-02007 10. Josee Goudreault is requesting an appeal of a Level One application (Flexible Standard Development case FLS2003- 12066) that requires the building be repainted a neutral color, under the provisions of Section 4-501. (Proposed Use: An existing building that has been painted light pwple [main portion of the exterior of a building] and dark pwple [base of the building and trim]) at 24 N. Ft. Harrison Ave., Earl & Tate's Sub., N 43 ft of Lots 12 & 13. APP2004-00001 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such pwpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that slbe is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk Lisa Fierce Planning Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 . , ._1 ---: j__' __1 --~-I: : ~ ~ --~~ :_-; '---I I , , ' , , ' , , ' ~ c_.. ~ ~ ,..~. ~ TUSKAWILLA ST .-, , , : .- rOo -.. I 1-. I I I I 1_10_' 10 I 0: '~.. ~ .q: ~~-I ~r" (!) " :2: ~ LIJ () '" ~ Cemetery ~ .q: .... ~ CI) i-; o " a: 12~': CI) ~ 130J Mltt.r ~,3 -. ,.! =.: : '.. =: I ~ ~I: ='; ~ CoI e ;-- 0: '--- '" 0: e , , , , , , , , ,. , , , , , 0'0' r.~- 10' I I ~Ol 1_ I ...- ~ ~ ----I ,----, " , " . 1__1 12~ , , --- I -- -.'--- ., 0 ~ ~ , , ,_.. I I , .' l)l '0",' C ~ 01: ~ J; J"'j,' I ... l___~-..___ LAKEVIEW RD Open Space / Park " ....... '.... ,..~......,... Surrounding Uses Owner. I Larry and Jo-Ann Dean Site: 935 Lakeview Road I Case: Property Size (Acres) : PIN: I Atlas Page: . . , " , '.' FLD2003-Qa036 .112 acres () ~ 1285 1:>>J7 r;:J89 1291 en .;t ~ :tJ :::! :2: .... c::: 1326 ~ 1S25 !II 1,.--- ~ 133,5. - -; ..G) ~ ):. rii 21/29/15/47466/001/0050 306A . . , , , , r----I ,----, I I I I . " : 1__1 12b I .. ---, .-" -, , , , I ~ ~--~ CO ,- , . , .~~: I , . . -...- ~if' 'is: -~ I 0 j-- ~ -~ ~ '" ~a:-I .&-~ 01 ~ . ~ .._~, . ~ ~-, I ' , , '" , ' ~, , , ~ P: . . , --,- ~ .... -' , '--- , , , t.._ _I , I'S5 , I , 1:137 ---., I;:iS9 , , I----,I---j .-. ' . , , ' . ' , , , : ' ' , , , , ' ,--, I I I" I 1'~_: ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ '" ~ ",' <:) I , ' 01 ~.... _: ~ ~ 8:: ~ : ..1"':1. I.... I l...... ..-.._.._. j--- , , ' l....... : 1301 Me'.r Sj , Sj C , , '-.... ~,-- ~ . . .- : '- , - . , -, Sj 1;l OS/R 1326 1~5 L __ "'... 133{ p Zoning Map Owner: I lorry and Jo-Ann Dean Case: FlD2003-Qa036 Site: 935 lakeview Road Property Size (Acres) : .112 acres PIN: 21/29/15/47466/001/0050 I Atlas Page: 306A . . Aerial Map 935 Lakeview Road I Case: Property Size(Acres) : FLD2003-Qa036 Owner. I Larry and Jo-Ann Dean Site: .112 acres PIN: 21/29/15/47466/001/0050 I Atlas Page: 306A . ' .... ----- - ---- -- "--- --- Vacant lot from Dempsey Street looking northeast to Lakeview Avenue The residential home from previous picture and the existing setback from building to curb 1--- I . Looking east down Dempsey Street with vacant lo.,! to the immediate north on e.,icture Looking south from Lakeview Ave. Existing concrete drive located on property to be removed. .".~ ,. "'-----..- _ _ 7~""'.yi" " .. I '::')- --_ 't ~'L.i -...$i\.. ...,,'-;r~ ;~., . .,... Subject property is vacant lot 5 and 6. 935 Lakeview Road FLD2003-08036 . . Existing curb cut and drive isle onto Dempsey Street from the Community Service Foundation located at 925 Lakeview Road, which is adjacent to 935 Lakeview Road SHACKTON, WILLIAM tHM, GERALD S & ASSOC INC ~EAN, LARRY 1635 DARTMOUTH ST 721 LAKEVIEW RD DEAN, JO ANN CLEARWATERFL 33758- CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3422 1856 REDCOAT LN CLEARWATER FL 33764- COMMUNITY SERVICE SADLON PROPERTIES INC SMITH, EDWARD B TRE FOUNDATION INC 411 CLEVELAND ST # 204 SMITH, YVONNE B TRE 925 LAKEVIEW RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3919 W IVY LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3420 DUNNELLON FL 34433 - REHM, GERALD S & ASSOC INC CLEARWATER FIREFIGHTERS REHM, GERALD S & ASSOC INC 721 LAKEVIEW RD ASSN C/O INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3418 LOCAL 1158 SERVICES INC 806 LAKEVIEW RD 802 LAKEVIEW RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3419 CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3419 KUCIEWICZ, RYSZARD F PAULTON, KALEB L INFINGER, JEFFREY W MAJEWSKA-KUCIEWICZ, PAULTON, KELSEY L INFINGER, FREDA A KRYSTYNA C/O P AULTON, TRACEY GDN 931 DEMPSEY ST 23811 HILLSIDE AVE # 51 817 DEMPSEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3405 BELLEROSE NY 11426 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3403 HORTON, JOHN S MATHENY, MICHAEL D STARR, PAULINE M HORTON, DENISE KNOX, REBECCA A STARR, MARGARET S 925 DEMPSEY ST 915 DEMPSEY ST 909 DEMPSEY ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3405 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3405 CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3405 WILLIAMS, MARY E PULSE, THOMAS F MC COMAS, DANNY L 901 DEMPSEY ST PULSE, JANICE M MC COMAS, BARBARA CLEARWATERFL 33756- 900 TUSKA WILLA ST 904 TUSKA WILL ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3442 CLEARWATERFL 33756- LASSEN, FINN SCHWARTZ, JILL DAVIS, TONY D 910 TUSKAWILLA ST 700 STARKEY RD # 921 DAVIS, SANDRA D CLEARWATER FL 33756 - LARGO FL 33771 - 2358 2193 KARAN WAY CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2414 ROSEMAN, DARRELL R MAYNARD, THELMAJ HURST, JEREMIAH E SR ROSEMAN, CONNIE M WILSON, BENITA D THOMAS, ALFRED T 920 TUSKA WILLA ST 824 TUSKA WILLA ST 709 WYATT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3442 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3440 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DEACON, RICK YARBROUGH, JOHN A KEENER, THEODORE 834 TUSKA WILLA ST 717 DREW ST 130 KOTTY OAK RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4112 COVENTRY RI 02816 - RODRIGUEZ, EYVIND 915 TUSKAWILLA ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3441 WEINERT, JAMES C WEINERT, DIANNE M 113 CRESTWOOD LN LARGO FL 33770 - WENNING, KAREN M 905 TUSKA WILLA ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3441 VOSS, DALE L 2300 BEACH TRL # 6 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - MILLS, WILLARD P III 912 LAKEVIEW RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3421 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 A F B PROPERTIES 1006 PINELLAS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3433 SMITH, REBECCA E 1000 TUSKA WILLA ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3444 KLEIN, J MARTIN 1000 LAKEVIEW RD STE 1 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3475 KLEIN, J MARTIN 1330 WHITACRE DR CLEARWATERFL 33764 - 3668 tTES, KEITH L ESTES, DOLORES R 1295 S PROSPECT AVE CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3462 YARBROUGH, JOHN A 717 DREW ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4112 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 A F B PROPERTIES 1006 PINELLAS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3433 KLEIN, J MARTIN 1000 LAKEVIEW RD STE 1 CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3475 KLEIN, J MARTIN 1000 LAKEVIEW RD STE 1 CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3475 ttEARDSLEY,GEOFFREY 906 LAKEVIEW RD CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3405 YARBROUGH, JOHN A 717 DREW ST CLEARWATERFL 33755 - 4112 LAKEVIEW SQUARE REPLAT CONDO ASSN 1020 LAKEVIEW RD CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 3423 CROCKETT, DENTON JR CROCKETT, BILL YE 0 TRE 1611 INDIAN ROCKS RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1653 KLEIN, J MARTIN 1000 LAKEVIEW RD STE 1 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3475 KLEIN, J MARTIN 1330 WHITACRE DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3668 . . i CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, February 17, 2004, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Conunission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishin!! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetin!!. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, nei!!hborin!! property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent a!!enda and approved by a sin!!le vote at the be!!innin!! of the meetin!!. 1. Roma Square, Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval (1) to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District with a reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd from 25 ft to 7.8 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback along Hercules Ave from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (south) setback along Rogers St from 25 ft to 1 ft (to existing building) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 1 ft (to existing building) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to required parking from 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (114 spaces) to 4.4 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (100 spaces), a deviation to locate a problematic use contiguous to a residentially zoned parcel and a deviation to locate a problematic use within a building which does not meet all of the current land development regulations and building regulations, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.L and (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Blvd (north) from 15 ft to 7.8 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Hercules Ave (west) from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Rogers St (south) from 10 ft to 1 ft (to existing building) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line from 5 ft to 1 ft (to existing building) and a reduction to the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Problematic use [check cashing]) at 2001-2021 Gulf to Bay Blvd. & 511 South Hercules Ave., Midway Sub., Lots 1-12. FLD2003-10055 2. (cont from 10/21/03) Larry & Jo Ann Dean are requesting a flexible development approval to permit an office with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 5,000 sq ft to 4,920 sq ft, a reduction to the lot width from 50 ft to 49 ft, a reduction to the front (north) setback along Lakeview Rd from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (south) setback along Dempsey St from 25 ft to 12 ft (to building) and reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C and a reduction to the north landscape buffer along Lakeview Rd from 10 ft to 4 ft, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 4 ft and a reduction to the side (west) landscape buffer from 5 ft to 2 ft, as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: 1,179 sq ft office) at 935 Lakeview Rd., Lake Belleview Add, Blk 1, Lots 5 & 6 less S1. FLD2003-08036 3. Clearwater Townhomes, Inc. (Paul Camp Lane, Esquire) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock for 10 slips totaling 1,080 sq ft, with each dock measuring 54 ft in length from the seawall, in conjunction with a 10-unit townhome development) at 161 Bri!!htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 14, 15 & 16. FLD2003-11058 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. . . ( Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.ill. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk Lisa Fierce Planning Department Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 02/01104 LOTUS . WAY PATH Owner: Larry and Jo-Ann Dean Site: 935 Lakeview Road . I~ 5T . c=:J~1 I ~~~D:Cill~ ~ l1 LA .. :; DRUID c::=J~c=J a: JASMINE ~ WAY ~c=J"c=J ::2 MAGNct..1A ~ DR c::=J II LOTUS PATH PROJECT I SITE Project Location Case: Property Size (Acres) : PIN: Atlas Page: " s ~ ~ c ~ EM' i!: z ~ i AD z iCJ ~ JEFFORDS ~ c=J~1 I BARRY a: ST Sc:=::J~1 I TUSCOlA ST c=:Jwc=J ~~~c=5 III ~ BROINNING C=:J~ C.R488 FLD2003-08036 .112 acres 21/29/15/47466/001/0050 306A . ~ ~ .q .... ~ INS ~ 2: U) 30J .liner ~ , , I r"'-" ~ :_~_: 0: 01 Cl ~~ ~-, ' P:: : , , t,..} ~ " 0; .. , : I. : 1:'1 , '0 , 'Sl- . ~ .q ~r- (!) ~ : ! '... ~ . ,- , , , , . ..~' ..~- t I I I I I I I ..~- ...... r----. I----~ I I I I I I I I I 1_ _I I ~PC? 12! .~ ~ ... ..-s~ ... 0 ..., ... , , ... , , 1285 , , , ---, : ' .- -- -~1-"" , ' , , ' , , ' ,_..., I , ' .. " , ' ~ 0 .., ' 0 , ' ~ ~ 8:: ~ ~...... _: .... , l___~-..___ ~ Owner: lorry and Jo-Ann Dean Site: 935 lakeview Road ~ U. , . , --. ---.. , , , . , ' .. ~... WATER Future Land Use LAKEV/EW RD ,: """"'" Case: Property Size (Acres) : PIN: Atlas Page: RIDS FlD2003-Qa036 .112 acres (I) ~ :0 ~ :2: r- c: 1326 ~ .925 ~ '---- ~ 133l - -; ~ ,1;lJ2. ~ , ~ ~ 21/29/15/47466/001/0050 306A . . 1856 Redcoat Lane Clearwater, F1.33764 Lany Dean Painting December 25,2003 Scott Rice City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Dept. MSB Building Clearwater, Fl. 33333 Dear Sir, This letter is in response to the DRC meeting on December 23, 2003 at 12:30 PM regarding the handicapped accessible route within the boundaries of the proposed project at 935 Lakeview Rd., Clearwater, Fl.. The accessible route from the handicapped parking space located just north of the building would be directly up the front porch area which is appropriately sloped to the front door as shown on the site plan. A route from the sidewalk along Lakeview Rd would be impractical owing to the restraints placed on the property by the landscape requirements. The property is required to have perimeter landscaping along both the east and west sides of the property that include trees and shrubbery. This would not leave room for a sidewalk but will provide the benefits of aesthetically pleasing views and climate control for the parking areas. The driveway which intersects the sidewalk and the parking area will be made of concrete and would provide a smooth surface for handicap access. Sincerely, Larry Dean Larry Dean Painting rnr;;~l~ ~ W] F-lAI'.INING & OE\iHOPMf:Nl ('vC~ CllY OF CLEARWATER ... ............ ....... ......... ,";' ,P""il'l r---- P'Y" , . ,~ In. t~, --, '- ~~, J. u;7" --- =;"7:i1? I & JMp-)~ :xJ ~ .. ~hm~.1 toot (0-61"11 . [U'f'~ ,~, " , uopd~~-------~-- Ul lU f- a z lU [L <( u Ul o z S ~ lU Z lU <.') ~ ~ ~ 1! ~ ~ i 0" &;8'<1 1; i; ~~ o'G~" ~ ~ ~r !:.~ ~, I!! ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ij 2 E" ~ ~ "-~ - lP ~ ~ ~i 2. " ;, ,Ill! 1: I! 'H ~ I:.,'. :..,i,~..., ~_i"._',I.::'.' ~<!.., 111~,lilli Iii i ;!~:: If~;HH~~! i:~j ~tO~~_~~"~~-,, ~~~ ;~~~~ :z W~iH~W,!~W mm ~ "-"n>"~'"1ih-~ "'He, :::i :::~~HI::wml~EHi ~ w 0 ~ 0 U) OJ 0 <XJ <D U1 w => ~ <{ " w '> w '" S ~ , f~ " 0' ~ E ,fH If,',_,;~ LU~ \1 (oj,cc" I eplJOH 'J"leMJe.o ~: peo~ MalA''fI'l Sf6 ~U!lU!-ed u-eaa .<J~~~__ UEld ~u3wdOI3^3a 3c:te:.SPUe'l I"~~ ~ " ~<u ," - :~~ ~~. 0;;; .!~ ~Zu ~:l: ~<p:; ~ , 3....:1-<( '" II ~ e. ~ 5-..0 !,~ ~~ ]~ ~i ]~ H 1~ ~, ~~ iJ~ j~ ~H ~ o C ~ ~ w , ll!!hL ~ ..... I ~ ,- . .: ~ " ~ . '" r , .., ~ ; ii! 0 ~H~~ i" . :;;.. .. , h ! ~ o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ "ij~i] ll:'in:'i~ ~~';~'i m ~, -~ ~~ g g ~ ~ 5~ ~~] t~ ~~ ~'~ ~ N~ ::-~ ~~ 1 :H' J ~ ~C\I , I ~ 0 \ ~ ~ \ ~ ~~~ ~ \ s t~i fj ~;~ ~I ::s~ I 2 ~1 ~.~ ~ t") f- a ..J r '" ~~ 0'0 In:f~ a~ 1110 za o~ l' ~ , ~ .g- In o ..J ~ N NI ~ , '" ~ ~ ;j, 0'" r________-----------.__ ~ ~~ J _ 1 ~ -I m.., ~ N 2;;:" l____~__ _J ~, ~ w ~ ~ 5 ~: ,. 0" ~ t~ rom '-~ ~" ~~ " .- ----.---_. >- w U1 o. ;> w o ec w > Q Q " w 5' w '" :s _ r , I ~." " w~ ~~8 1"1 H u ---1 . ~ ~~ ~ ......; C lh't\j). \j) N~~ ~ .., .. ~ (<)1'- ~ "1<0 " lJ 0 "" ~ ~ 15 ~ Oi J~H~a ~ :0 " ~r .J:: u. U)~ ~~ "" Lo q)~ .... "'''' ~~ -+JU c ~1l [LU R ~.~~~~() ~~-~U[: <1 ~~ & lI) C\J 0 ~ t,[)(\i U) r<') 6 ~~ ~- ti2 (I) z '" . ~ ~ , Q ! '" " ~ '" z ~ ~ .~ UI"6nl -- . ~.tnr' ""''''-....... ">0(] ~!'d!J=O (:1 W Id CO ,. "- Dc: '" "' W -~:) Z ~ <( 3 Ld '> ,oj " ~ ~ i l: ~ ~ hi ~]l )tl!l ~d 0 -:;; 0 Ul m 0 ro CD U1 U"ld ~uawdOla^aa UO!~"ll!JJ I I;"''''~ ~p..,f-< ~ Q .' I-<...r::u !:'"';:l; ~ ~~ ~J_~ :, @~i ~~: "Zu~~~ ~ <~ ~"- 3.....l< <>. ep!JOI:l 'Joo'eM.reaD pro~ MO!AO'l"l SE6 j ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~' ~~ ~ !~ ~ s ~i ~;,-i ~~ ~f ~~": H~ H c" ~'v :','~~ ~~ " "in H H~ ,H m ;, ^ H~ Ht m ~.~ L,~~~ ~!H 1!8!f ...1') "'~,,~ ""'Ii ~~~ " 0' ~;,Ijj,~f"-.~ 11 111!le!I!!ll! ' 11,!ll!!I!;1!1!!!!: z ~ ~ t :z ~ 0' " ~ ~~:~~!;5tdl~~;;;:1 ~~R~ ~ ~ I "! ';;;.DDDD60oo<J~<JoO.I<D ~ /91'l111 l B h! . HIll I: Hili!! ~i~il 6 ~ " " "! " ~ ~ 0: l, H nd!! ~. H: ~ H~ ~ ~ ~ ,,-" d! lIt , ~,~ .~ HI Ii !l ~ ~ ~ ~ f ,g s ~ - 0 ~ z a ~ ~ , ~ S~ g:;l.:J ~. w z " rn . J n u ~ I .~ w I < > 0 r--- '" r" --.J .~ I --1 L o<~ , "n ~8 'ii, za 'T 2; 0< >-lJ !i;~ Qo.~ VI" f- ~~'" ~i I 0 u I "8,,, c~ , --.J LO <l;: O~ ~ B~ ~ < < o ~ 3 w :> uJ y :5 J ~ (W),6tL6 AI.~90.IXW !~- ~ Ul L[) CJ> '" ~ o o~ r-----------------_ i"- f- o --.J (J),ooor u z ij 5 m~ "N ~~ ~ w a . ~ ro~ ;;;-~ a:::?, ~. 2 a 1_: : ---- --.--- -j------------ .- - ~- [' U ;- H.~. ~ I~. ,.1 ~~. z ili~' rJ ~ _=-J . " <ii u (f) <;> o i: ~ . . CITY OF CLEARWATER LoNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (127) 562-4567 FAX (127) 562-4576 December 05,2003 Mr. Larry Dean 1856 Redcoat Lane Clearwater, FL 33764 RE: Flexible Development approval to permit a reduction in the minimum lot area from 5,000 square feet to 4,920 square feet, a reduction in the lot width from 50 feet to 49 feet, a reduction in the front (north) setback along Lakeview Road from 25 feet to four feet (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and five feet (to building), the front (south) setback along Dempsey Street from 25 feet to 12 feet (to building), and the side (west) setback from 10 feet to two feet (to pavement) and four feet (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-704.C and a reduction in the perimeter landscape buffer requirements from 10 feet to four feet along Lakeview Road, the side (east) setback from five feet to four feet, and the side (west) setback from five feet to two feet as part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Dear Mr. Dean: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development and has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December 23, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL)ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4539 or bberrv@c1earwater- fl.com. Sincerely yours, Bryan Berry Planner E:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next DRClLakeview 935 Dean (C)lLakeview 935 Complete Letter 2.doc 10- 9-03; 12:12 ;CIT~ CLERK DEPT. ; 727 ,562 4C86 # 2/ . . COMMUNITY SERVICE FOUNDATION, INC. Affordable HOUS;'lg Se/'vices 925 Lakeview Road · Clearwater, FL 33756-3420 · (727) 461-0618 . Fax (727) 443-6287 mai!@csfhome.org · www.csfhome.org October 6, 2003 RECEIVED OCT 08 2003 Ms. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 OFFICiAL RECORDS AND LEGISlATIVE SRVCS DEPT RE: Community Development Board "Public Hearing" Tuesday, October 21, 2003 Dear Ms. Goudeau: In reference to item FLD2003-08036; 935 Lakeview Road (Lany & Jo Ann Dean) request for variances. I know of several neighbors that would like to speak on this agenda item, therefore, would you please not place this item on the Consent Agenda. Thank you. "".' LEAVE A LEOACY~ "....."',...',....,,',',.,...,,,..-"'_,,',_.._.o_,,~,.d . '.' ,','. . TAM PA BAY 10- 9-C3;12:12 ;CITY CLERK DEPT. ;727 562 4086 # 1/ .3 . . o City of Clearwater, Florida Official Records and Legislative Services Department Phone (727) 562-4090 Fax (727) 562-4086 ~ Clearwater FAX MESSAGE TO: Frank Gerlock MSB - 2nd floor - Planning Dept. LOCATION: FAX NO.: (727) 562 -4865 COMMENTS: Letter regarding case # FLD2003-08036 935 Lakeview Rd - Larry & Jo Ann Dean Any problems or questions please call me at (727) 562-4099. FROM: Susan Chase DA TE: October 9. 2003 NUMBER OF PAGES THIS MESSAGE (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 3 . . J;=LO 2..003- () 903~ '#F I G06 . /0/;;21/05 (!? Community Development Board Public Hearing, Tuesday, October 21,2003 Resident Petition to Deny development of 935 Lakeview Road as proposed by Larry & Jo Ann Dean FLD2003-08036 The undersigned Clearwater residents living on Dempsey Street, Clearwater, FL 33756, strongly oppose the development of935 Lakeview Road as proposed by the owners Larry and Jo Ann Dean. As proposed the development of this parcel calls for too many and too extreme variances to allow the development ofa 1,260 sq. ft. building and required parking. Variances are being requested to build on a 4,920 sq. ft. lot where 10,000 sq. ft is the current minimum lot size required by City code. Also being requested is a reduction in front (north) setback for parking from 25 ft. to 4 ft., an 84% reduction in green space; reduction in east setback for pavement from 10ft. to . .J 4 ft. and 5 ft. for building; a west setback from 10ft. to 2 ft. for pavement and 1 ft for building; and the rear (south) setback of the property along Dempsey from 25 ft. to 10 ft. for building. These variance requests are excessive and do not the serve the community well. In addition, it is our understanding that the applicant is not only requesting ingress and egress on Lakeview Road but also on Dempsey Street into a residential neighborhood. The exit on Dempsey Street should not be allowed. We the residents of Dempsey Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 sign this petition to advise the Community Development Board that we strongly oppose the development of 93 5 Lakeview Road as proposed and request that you deny the applicant's requ<(S!tq tleve1op. this site as the project is proposed. ~;.<<' . iw ~ Thank you your consideration of our request. Addresses q l ~ D f..'~y::>st: y 5;f-. ~ 'if :3 9 Ll1/:2= l; I ew if () q lJe #-/" ;27 '7 -2 ~- j).PH {&? 93/ ~~m'?;e 8/ 7 ~~~ SIt' 'TrCtt. C(IJ /-10~'\ I~~ PN~ OC T ~2 ~3 2003 r ; ; " e e CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 21, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests: NOTE: All persons wishine: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine:. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neie:hborine: property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent ae:enda and approved by a sine:le vote at the bee:innine: of the meetine:. 1. (cont. from 09/16/03) Clearwater Retail Group, Ltd. (Amscot) are requesting an Amendment to previous approvals for signage: 1) Cases FLD 02-02-06A1SGN2003-02009 - Conditions 1 and 2 which requires that the fmal design, height, area, color, etc. of signs be consistent with the drawings submitted to, or as modified by the CDB, and that the signs for future tenants of the retail center have the same background and text colors as approved by the CDB, as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1807; and 2) Case FLD2003-05023 - Condition 2 requiring that all signage comply with the approved Comprehensive Sign Program application FLD 02-02-06A1SGN2003-02009. (Proposed Use: An amendment to a Comprehensive Sign Program for Amscot Financial, Inc. [922 South Missouri Avenue]), at 922 South Missouri Avenue., Sec. 22-29-15, M&B 21.01. SGN2003-08001 2. Robert Hupp & Allen McMullen are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a reduction in the front (north) setback from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and from 35 ft to 16 ft (to generator pad) along Charles Avenue, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 98 spaces (5/1,000 sq ft) to 97 spaces (4.9/1,000 sq ft) and an increase in building height from 30 ft to 38.5 ft, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.C (Proposed Use: A 19,560 sq ft medical clinic.) at 3080 Allen Avenue., Acker's Sub, Blk 4, Lots 4-7 & 12-15, part of Lots 8-11. FLD2003-08037 3. Larry & Jo Ann Dean are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 3.8 ft (to building) and from approval to permit a reduction in the minimum lot area from 10,000 sq ft to 4,920 sq ft, a reduction in the lot width from 100 ft to 49 ft, a reduction in the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement) along Lakeview Road, reductions in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to four ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction in the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to building) along Dempsey Street, and reductions in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to one foot (to building), for an office use as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provision of Section 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: A 1,260 sq ft office) at 935 Lakeview Rd., Lake Belleview Add, Blk 1, Lots 5 & 6 less St. FLD2003-08036 4. The Salvation Army are requesting a flexible development approval (1) to permit a mixed-use project (including sociaVpublic service agency, congregate care and residential shelter) in the Institutional District with a reduction of the front (north - E. Druid Road) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the front (west - S. Highland Avenue) setback from 25 ft to 13 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction of the front (east - terminus of Jasmine Way) from 25 ft to 6 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 1.5 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to existing pavement and storage shed), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1204.A; (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District with a reduction of the front (north - E. Druid Road) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction of the front (east - S. Crest Avenue) setback from 25 ft to 2.5 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction of the front (south - Jasmine Way) setback from 25 ft to 6 ft (to pavement) and to retain an existing 6 ft high solid masonry wall within the front setback along S. Crest Avenue and Jasmine Way at a zero feet setback, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section2-204.E; and (3) to permit a reduction of the landscape buffer along S. Highland Avenue (west) from 15 ft to 13 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along E. Druid Road (north) from 15 ft to 10 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along S. Crest Avenue (east) from 10 ft to 2.5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer along Jasmine Way (south) from 10 ft to 6 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer at the terminus of Jasmine Way (east) from 10 ft to 6 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction of the landscape buffer adjacent to single family dwellings (east) from 10 ft to 7 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the west property line adjacent to the YMCA from 5 ft to 1.5 ft (to pavement), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3 -1202.G. (Proposed Use: Salvation Army facilities [correctional services, social services, congregate care and residential shelter, with off-street non-residential parking within a residential zoning district]) at 1521 E. Druid Rd., Sec. 14-29-15, M&B 34.01, Druid Groves, Blk A, Lots 1-12 and Vac St. FLD2003-08040 e e 5. Paradise Cove Clearwater. Inc. and Stanley & Anna Kulach are requesting a flexible development approval to permit 1) attached dwellings with a building height of 28 ft - 8 inches, 2) with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), 3) reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), 4) reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck and boardwalk), and 5) to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for nine lots. (Proposed Use: An attached residential development of nine dwelling units) at 145 Bril!htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2, Lots 11-13. FLD2003-07033/PLT2003-00010 6. Harborside Townhomes. LLC (DiGiovanna Partners) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit 1) attached dwellings with a building height of 28 ft - 8 inches, 2) reduction the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5.3 ft (to building), 3) reduce the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.7 ft (to pavement), 4) reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to building), 5) reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 13.6 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to boardwalk), and 6) to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: An attached residential development of six dwelling units) at 140 Bril!htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2, Lot 47 and riparian rights & Lot 48. FLD2003-07034/PL T2003-00009 7. Brian A. & Joanne M. Kalan and ACS Resorts. Inc. (Simdag Investments, LLC) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions to the required front setback from 15 ft to 10ft for pavement, a reduction to the required side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft to pavement and pool deck, a reduction from the required side (west) setback from 10ft to 5 ft to the pool bath building, a reduction from the required side setback (east) from 10ft to 6 ft to the generator building and from 10 ft to 5.7 ft to the dumpster staging area, a reduction to the required rear yard setback from 20 ft to zero ft to the pool deck, and from 20 ft to 7 ft to pavement, a reduction to the required rear yard setback from 20 ft to 16.5 ft to building, and an increase in height from 35 ft to 93 ft (midpoint of all roofs), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and the Transfer of Development Rights for 9 dwelling units from 130 Brightwater Drive (3 units), 145 Brightwater Drive (5 units) and 620 Bayway Boulevard (1 unit), under the provisions of Section 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Attached dwelling units [55-unit condominium; seven floors of living area over ground- level parking]) at 514 South Gulfview Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 1-5 & riparian right. FLD2003-080411 TDR2003-08004 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. . . FAR = DUlac = OVU/ac = THEN Commercial District Commercial General Classification 0.55 OR 23958 sq.ft. permitted/ac 24 OR 24 dwelling unitslac 40 40 OVU per acre one dwelling unit = 998.25 one OVU = 598.95 OVU = overnight accommodation unit sq.ft. of nonresidential floor area sq.ft. of nonresidential floor area So, if one located a ~~,OOO sq.ft. building on a one acre parcel, all else being equal you could locate either 13 dwelling units or 23 OVU (see the math below) 11,12;.5" /1,077 23,953 - 10,000 = 13958 13958/598.95 = 23.30 /:.:- :;. , ,;;J OR13 dwelling units OR 13958/998.25 = 13.98 OR 23 OVU Or, if one located a 10,000 sq.ft. building on one acre parcel AND 10 dwelling units, all else being equal, you could locate an additional six OVU (see math below) 23,953 - 10,000 = 13958 10 du * 998.25 = 9982.5 23958 (sq.ft.permitted) - 10000 (proposed nonresidential sq.ft.) - 9982.5 (nonres. sq.ft. that 10 du equals) = 3975.5 3975.5/598.95 = 6.637448869 OR six OVU Naturally, this is just straight mathematics. Some may say that trip generation should be used. I say that that will get too confusing. What kind of OVU will dictate number of trips. So will the type of dwelling unit. The Code doesn't make that differentiation and I don't see why we should ~ither. O. f)~W\l?~:( b',~ i)'! )f~ I {~!oS rtJ OBSOLE (.-". i z,~ 0 -:t} '---i~ 0 B .4b J ,~-.\..-):;L, _/ \..j./')l-. l) .- -{/ \ J' ( "1 /1 D, ltttkH rr1 ~ f) 5 << Pt2-t(?6>~{) . J. I I It ~lhAz ;")1 A'l c.. D l,if(. Al5r2ft- ... ) t~v" j-ff: (Z/llAt ~) QBSOLJ. . . 4loFrH~ ~ ~c.s~ ~,) 1/ ~~, C"':t -- -, J ~- ~ ~ -===- ~ ~Jt/4TE\'\ ~~ ~~.. CITY OF CLEARWATER LoNG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 August 26, 2003 Mr. Larry Dean 1856 Redcoat Lane Clearwater, FL 33764 RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit a mix use of residential and office, a reduction in the front north setback from 25 feet to 4 feet (to pavement), the side east setback from 10 feet to 4 feet (to pavement) and 5 feet (to building), the front south setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), and the side west setback from 10 feet to 2 feet (to pavement) and 1 feet (to building) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provision of Section 2-203.B. Dear Mr. Dean: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to permit a mix use of residential and office, a reduction in the front north setback from 25 feet to 4 feet (to pavement), the side east setback from 10 feet to 4 feet (to pavement) and 5 feet (to building), the front south setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), and the side west setback from 10 feet to 2 feet (to pavement) and 1 feet (to building) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provision of Section 2-203.B. at 935 Lakeview Road. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2003-08036. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 18, 2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILLjONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" . . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4539 or bberrv@c1earwater- fl. com. Sincerely yours, S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next DRCILakeview Rd. 935 - DeanlLakeview 935 Complete Letter.doc