FLD2003-09047
-......
.,
:e
, Clearwater
~~j~~~:::::::;
",_~'~~r'^-,_",,,
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #: ~t>'2-DDr- o1704-7
DATE RECEIVED: 9 ~ +} '0 ~
RECEIVED BY (staff initi Is): W 50 N
ATLAS PAGE#: 2l.a2.: ~
ZONING DISTRICT: \ ~ 'T
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: \ 1-
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
~ SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
.6 SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
, SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ \2.-05. a-o
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 11/05/02)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~ use additional sheets as necessary
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT r'>JAME:
BelCal Properties, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS:
2040 N.E. Coachman Road, Clearwater, Florida 33765
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
msketampabay.rr.com
PHONE NUMBER:
727-441-1951
CELL NUMBER:
727-458-6907
FAX NUMBER:
727-449-1724
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
BelCal Properties, LLC
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME(S):
Gerald A. Fiqurski, Esquire
MAILING ADDRESS: 2435 u. S. Hi q h w a y 1 9, Sui t e 350, H 01 i d a y, F lor i d a 34691
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
fig(c1fhlaw.net
PHONE NUMBER:
727-942-0733
CELL NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
727-944-3711
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 1750 Nor t h Bel cher Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See enclosed boundary survey
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)
01/29/15/J6488/000/0120
PARCEL NUMBER:
3.288 acres or 143,210 SF
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Redevelopment of property to three uses:
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
distribution facility, office and credit union.
PARCEL SIZE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT
(include ali requested code deviations; e,g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City Off)afttt G f N A L
--
.
Dofs THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE IN FILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) _ Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redeveiopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
-,
-
.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
e TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
0[ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
[2( GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
Q[ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks
~ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses
I:iI:: REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering if possible
I:iI:: FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
e
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
ell LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes
i/9 REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (color rendering if possible)
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications)
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable
H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21)
Ql STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outiet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
~ COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
Ql COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-iN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
Q{ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials
Q{ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
SENT BY: FIGURSKI&HARRILLi
-
727 9443711 i
NOV - 5 - 03 15: 11 ;
. '
PAGE 2/2
K. TRAFrlC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4.202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Incll.tde as required 11 proposed development will d$9rade the aGcept.abl~ level of ~<:>IYIC8 for llny roadway el;l adapted In lhe Compreh,msiv8 PI;:m,
TnI' generation sh.1I1 be ba,!;ed an lhe moet reo,iml edition of the Instltl.tte of TronBportatlon Englnliler'~ Trip GeMral ManuaL Refer IQ $ectlon 4-801
C of the Commllnil,y PI;l"",lopmenl Code for ell;ceptlQns 10 Ihls requirement
,_..1
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, llck.nowledge lhat all representations mad.. i" this
Elpp!il;lalion af.. e and accurate kl the be:!;t of my knowledge Md
authorize Y re r8Iamtatl"i1!i to visil and pholograph the prOpel1Y
des crib in Ihis 'ppIlC<lllon.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEl-LAS S~
Sworn \0 and subscrlbod beronl me this . day rA
-Npvr=>rnbF>r , A.D. 20..J}3 to I1le and/or by
~i'1rk .8- Klein, who Is peroor1<1lly known !lEIs
p~uood u
identification.
y:
Slgna[ure of property owner or r8presentative
Mark S. Klein
N,,,~1?(?~/~CM6 ./ ,
My commission explre.s: ....111lH/,.., [
,"''.'J'.~!'.u';'' r; I 8 "
,~,~?' B .:o~ are (jl II...UI I .......-,
f~( .ifl !:~ MY COMMISSION # CC894575 EXPIRES
'~.)i."':~';'\~/) January 10, 2004
",'Nf.,\~'" bONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC.
Page 6 of 7 - FloxJble DsvelopmentApplicallon - Compreher1!;1'i9 Infill Rede'islopmenl Project-. City of CI<;lslWater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
BelCal, LLC
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1750 North Belcher Road, C]earwatpr
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
To allow a credit union within the IRT Zoning District
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Gerald A. Fiqurski, Esquire
)
Fiqurski & Harrill, 2435 u.s. 19, Suite 350, HolidFlY, PT, l4Gql
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a buiiding permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
Property Owner
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this applic
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (lIwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is trjiE3 and correct.
/ /'
I (
"
Mark S. Klein
Property Owner
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
STATE OF FLORIDA,
S:IPlanning DeparlmentlAppiication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Forms\comprehensive inti/! application 2002.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Mark S. Klein
(Names of all property owners)
.
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1750 North Belcher Road, Clearwater
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
To allow a credit union within the IRT Zoning District
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Gerald A. Fiqurski, Esquire
Figurski & Harrill. 2435 u.s. 19, Suite 350, Holiday, FL 34691
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this applicatio
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true andcorrecl.
;
/
/
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
go the un~~d, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this
, personally appeared Mar k S. K 1 e i n
eposes and says that e/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she sign
.. "'''~'''''''' Gerald A Figurski
My Commission ~~:,1~~ MY COMMISSION # DD118111 EXPIRES
~~. ,~"~ .: ff July 17, 2006
~"i'.'",,~ BQNOO)THIlU TROY FAIN INSURAllCf.INC.
I'~I\'''\
~LfJL
day of
who having been first duly sworn
""")
S:IPlanning OepartmentlAppiication Forms\development reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive intill application 2002.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
-
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Steven C. Klein
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1750 North Belcher Road, Clearwater
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
To allow a credit union within the IRT Zoning District
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Gerald A. Fiqurski, Esquire
F'igllrski ^' Hrlrrill, ?4ll) IT S. lq, .Sllitp ll)(), HnlinrlY, F'lnrinrl l4fiql
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this apPlicatibn~l the own
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; j .i
, ,I
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. / I,
/ ,
/
r?'---'''-'~-
T
Property Owner
a10rizes City
I
)
~
Property Owner
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
STATE OF FLORIDA,
M~~he unQersig~d, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of \Iorida, on this
, ).(.)0 S personally appeared S t eve n e. K 1 e l n
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
My commiSSil;J~D't.~"t"'" : Gerald A Figurski
f*f'~ }'1MY COMMISSJON # DD.118111 EXPIRES
~'" /, ."~ July 17, 2006
"~Rr:,f.-<W BONDED THRU TlIOY FAJNlNSURANC~ 1He.
:JW
S:\Planning DepartmentlAppiication Forms\development reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive intilf application 2002.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
Julia Klein
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1750 North Belcher Road, Clearwater
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
To allow a credit union within the IRT Zoninq District
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
Figurski & Harrill, 2435 IJ.S. 19, Suite 350, Holiday, FL 34691
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit,
certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6.
That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. /."/ . ....' y~. .'.;: "
~",4U__~4----
Property Owner~1 J u 1 i a K 1 e i n
Property Owner
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
STATE OF FLORIDA,
A.1C1!or't):e ~e un~e~~i~,ed, an officer duly commissioned by the I?ws of the St?te of Florida, on this
U . n 'X , :){C)~ personally appeared J U II a K 1 e l n
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
~/ (
My Commission Expires:
.::-'.r,~~:'f~!?i~" Map! I'll. won
-"'A<>~ ,
N ," ':*1 MY COMMISSION /I DD004238 EXPIRE'
~.r:"'."', ./!/ March 6, 2005
'Ii. ... o~, BONDEDTHRU 0 -
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewl2002 Formslcomprehensive Infilf application 2002.doc
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
-
B.
Description of Request:
The application seeks the right to develop a third building. Two currently have
been approved, the first for a new St. Petersburg Times' distribution center and the
second an office. The third will be for a GTE Federal Credit Union. Clearly, this
third building will complement the first two. The use overall will be less intense
than allowed. In that the zoning is IRT, certain deviations from guidelines set forth
in the Code must be addressed as follows:
Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales (financial
services) with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial
street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a
separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons
beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redeveloplnent
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C.
D.
GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The GTE Federal Credit Union building will be located in the midst of one of the
largest, if not the largest, industrial sections within the City. The area is land-use
designated as Industrial Limited. The zoning is primarily IRT. Properties
immediately adjacent include Cox Air Conditioning, a City Fire Training station,
and property used for parking of Blood Bank vehicles. Properties slightly removed
include a pump company, a Roger's Bar-B-Que restaurant, a UPS facility, and an
office building. The GTE Federal Credit Union will rest in an area that is
primarily industrial and IR T. The area is bordered on the east and west by Belcher
and Hercules. The majority of the buildings are older and truly "industrial" in
appearance especially those on the Hercules side.
The actual development of the area does not necessarily conform to the intent of
the IRT zoning designation. Most of the buildings do not include the retail sales
and service use contemplated by the Code. Banking services are identified as a
permitted use under "Retail Sales and Services" subject to certain guidelines.
Obviously, this type of service is needed by individuals working within this IRT
e
e
area. A separate primary building to service these needs at a comer location would
well serve the needs of employees within this industrial area. Additionally, this
service at this location would capture employees and individuals working within
and using the Belcher corridor. Other than one bank to the north, a significant
piece of the Belcher and Hercules Corridors is without this service. An alternate
would be U.S. 19 but appropriate capture by the proposed project would also be of
value to traffic along U.S. 19.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The GTE Federal Credit Union Building will be aesthetically pleasing, more so
than most of the adjacent buildings as well as the overall IRT District. Except for
the Blood Bank vehicle storage parcel to the west, the adjacent properties are
developed with a City fire training tower and an air conditioning company. This
use would not cause a buyer from investing in nearby property.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The GTE Federal Credit Union use will not generate the kind of pollutants or
toxins or other substances dangerous to the health of residents or workers.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The site is designed for ease of traffic flow in and out of the property. Access will
be to Calumet Street and Belcher Road (right in/out only). The number of curb
cuts will be reduced by one. Certain cross access features exist which will also
improve traffic flow. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant
impact on affected intersections and roadways. The Level of Service category will
. .
remam as IS.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The community is industrial in nature. The overwhelming majority of structures
are more "industrial" than the kind of development believed intended by the IR T
District. The GTE Federal Credit Union building will be at the higher end of the
scale aesthetically, compatible with other existing uses, non-detrimental to adjacent
--
-
uses or the expectations of adj acent owners, and consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
6. The design of the proposed development mInImIZeS adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent
properties.
The structure will be attractive. The intensity of use of the subject parcel will
allow a greater degree of open space. No offensive odors or noise will be created.
Twenty- four hour operation will not exist.
COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA.
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for the
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
The request is to permit "Retail Sales and Services," in particular, "Financial
Services." The application seeks a deviation from certain guidelines set forth in
Section 2-1303(L), two of which are as follows:
The use of the parcel will involve direct access to a major arterial
street. The GTE Federal Credit Union, if approved by the Community
Development Board, will be the third building on the parcel at Belcher and
Calumet. Two other buildings - one for a new St. Pete Times Distribution
Center and the second for an office building have heretofore been approved
by the City as Level One approvals. Direct access to Belcher Road was
approved by staff for these two other structures. The access point however
is only right in/right out. Allowing this deviation of direct access to Belcher
Road for the GTE Federal Credit Union is not only reasonable in light of the
prior approvals, it will enhance overall traffic flow.
The service will be located in a building of its own, not as part of
another structure, and will occupy one hundred percent of the building. The
IRT guidelines for Retail Services view a retail service as being part of a
structure providing another permitted use. So, the thrust of the IRT District
guidelines is to allow retail services and restaurants in conjunction with
other uses, e.g., manufacturing or vehicle service. However, the area within
which the subject parcel is located, albeit IRT, is filled with existing
industrial buildings without such services being provided internally within
.
.
such buildings. A GTE Federal Credit Union use would well serve this large
IRT District stretching for some distance between Hercules and Belcher. In
this area, a financial services use is only provided by one other such
institution. Otherwise, workers need to access such services son1ewhere on
U.S. 19. The employee numbers of this individual area would suggest that
such service is needed. Further, a banking service would fill the void
created by existing buildings with a dearth of internal retail services.
The GTE Federal Credit Union building will be located in the midst of one
of the largest, if not the largest, industrial sections within the City. The area
is land-use designated as Industrial Limited. The zoning is primarily IRT.
Properties immediately adjacent include Cox Air Conditioning, a City Fire
Training station, and a property used for parking of Blood Bank vehicles.
Properties slightly removed include a pump company, a Roger's Bar-B-Que
restaurant, a UPS facility, an office building. The parcel had an older 28,000
square foot structure (UP ARC) which has been demolished. The GTE
Federal Credit Union will rest in an area that is primarily industrial and IRT.
The area is bordered on the east and west by Belcher and Hercules. The
majority of the buildings are older and truly "industrial" in appearance
especially those on the Hercules side.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for developn1ent as a
comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of
the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
Far from reducing the value of abutting properties, the project will tremendously
enhance the value thereof. The current assessed value of the property is
$650,000.00. The projected value of the site with improvements will increase to
approximately $3,000,000.00.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The proposed use as Retail Sales and Service is otherwise permitted in the district
subject to approval of the deviations requested.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment
project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
.
.
The proposed use is compatible - like - with other surrounding uses. Most
important, it will not have an adverse public impact and will not be a detriment to
the value of, and owner expectations for, surrounding properties.
One other deviation from the guidelines set forth in Code Section 2-1303(L) relates
to who is served by the proposed use:
The guidelines suggest the use primarily serve employees or patrons
of other uses in the area. The focus of the services of the GTE Federal
Credit Union is primarily workers. Although others will be served, a
significant void for workers in this large industrial area will be filled by this
use. Not only will this use be therefore compatible and mesh with existing
uses, it will also in addition well serve the larger area.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses
within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available
in the City of Clearwater.
The applicant has reviewed and is extremely familiar with real estate in
Clearwater. There are currently no available sites anywhere surrounding the
Clearwater Industrial Park.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
comprehensive infill redevelopnlent project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
The immediate vicinity includes the Salvation Army, the Long Center, a
Clearwater fire station, a newly approved 7Y2 acre flex space development,
Regions Bank, Roger's Bar-B-Que, Cox Air Conditioning, and a multiple for
existing industrial uses. The proposed redevelopment carries on the tradition of
newer surrounding structures. Continued improvement of this area will only
continue to enhance the City as a whole. The development and design of the
project will benefit the community both functionally and aesthetically.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project
creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
-
-
Approval of the proposed comprehensive infill project will allow redevelopment of
the property in a manner which minimizes other impacts. It will enhance and
further upgrade this area of the City. Additional development of this nature is a
key component to appropriate growth in this area. The City will especially benefit
by having an attractive building complex located in a developing area. The
function of financial services will well serve the area.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street
parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
As to these matters, the project will fully comply with the Code. No deviation
therefrom is being requested.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate VICInIty according to the
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-
street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
On-site parking exceeds Code requirements.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Not applicable.
e
-
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS
November 21,2003
Mr. Bennett Elbo
Public Works Administration/Engineering
City of Clearwater
Municipal Services Building, Room #220
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: DEM Partnership Property
Belcher Road at Calumet Street
Dear Mr. Elbo:
Enclosed for your review are five (5) copies of the traffic study prepared to review potential impacts for
the proposed redevelopment on the project site.
Our review indicates that this proposed change in land use would result in less than 100 vehicles per
hour increase in traffic during the PM peak hour. It is believed that this small of an increase in traffic
would result in only minor impact to the surrounding road network. The traffic counts taken for this
study identified that the PM peak hour was from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. The credit union that will occupy this
site will be closed by 5:00 p.m. weekdays, thereby limiting their impact on the peak hour.
Please contact me following you review of this study should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
,/) /.:; j
i~%a~~~r~7tc--~
Vice President of Transportation Services
:es
K:\Belcher at Calumet\Letters\Elbo.doc
Encl.
cc: Mark Klein, w/Encl.
Jerry Figurski, w/Encl.
Michael Lloveras, w/Encl.
File 699-190-40.06
6321 GRAND BOULEVARD · NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34652
Tel: (727) 849-7588 · Fax: (727) 848-3648
I
'I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
.
orff{/ W ~ ~
PLAII4NC/fNlYO& OEVHOPMtNT ('~iCtl
F CLEARWATER v
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST
QUADRANT OF BELCHER ROAD AND CALUMET STREET
IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER
PREPARED FOR: DEM PARTNERSHIP
PREPARED BY:
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
6321 GRAND BOULEVARD
NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34655
Phone: (727)849-7588
Fax: (727)858-3648
November 20, 2003
",
1
I
f /
!i ,~'
:1 "\
,/
~ i
J
I
· , f
f ! II,
; . ( .
\ "
') ,,-,
:,-~
"
.I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
-
e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................1
2.0 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK.........................................................................1
3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC .................. ..... ......... ....................... ....................... ........... ...... .....1
FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION MAP ................................................................2
TABLE 1. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ............................................................ 3
4.0 INTERNAL AND PASS-BY CAPTURE ....................................................................4
5.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION.. ........... ............... ....................... .................. ....................... .....4
6.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC ................ .................................... ..................... ................... ....... 4
FIGURE 2. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION........................................................ 5
7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ................... ........................................................... ............. .......6
7.1 BELCHER ROAD AT CALUMET STREET INTERSECTION ..................... 6
FIGURE 3. TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................... ..... ................. 7
8.0 LINK ANALySIS...... ......... ............ ............... .......... ........ .... .............. ............................8
9.0 CONCLUSION ............... ...... ............ ............................................. ....... ......................... 8
APPENDIX
I
I
I
1.0
I
I
I
I
2.0
I
I
I
3.0
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
e
.
INTRODUCTION
This traffic study was prepared to examine potential impacts to the transportation network
resulting from the redevelopment of a parcel of property located in the southwest quadrant of the
Belcher Road at Calumet Street intersection in the City of Clearwater, Florida. An existing
general light industrial building located on this site is proposed for replacement with three
smaller structures to include a newspaper distribution center, a credit union with drive-in
windows, and a small office. The following sections summarize the projected impact of these
land use changes.
EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK
As indicated in Figure I, Project Location Map, Belcher Road is oriented in a north-south
direction. Belcher Road is a four lane divided roadway with a left turn lane provided in the
median for turns to westbound Calumet Street. The southbound roadway has two lanes that
provide a through lane and a combined through right turn lane. Calumet Street is a two lane
undivided roadway extending from Belcher Road to Hercules A venue, having "T" intersections
with both Belcher Road and Hercules Avenue. A single lane for left and right turns is provided
on Calumet Street approaching Belcher Road. The Belcher Road at Calumet Street intersection is
unsignalized. Signalized intersections in the project vicinity include Belcher Road at N.E.
Coachman Road, Belcher Road at Sunset Point, and Calumet Street at Hercules Avenue. The
posted speed limit on Belcher Road is 45 miles per hour (MPH) and on Calumet Street is 30
MPH.
PROJECT TRAFFIC
It is proposed to redevelop the existing project site. A comparison has been made between the
existing approved development and proposed land use for the site. The existing approval is for a
25,415 square feet general light industrial building. The proposed land uses include a 12,000
square foot office, a 3,528 square foot credit union with drive in facilities, and a 16,700 square
foot general light industrial building. The number of trips that would be generated by these land
uses has been estimated using information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
informational report Trip Generation. Because limited information is available for credit unions,
ITE Land Use Code (LUe) 912, Drive-in Bank, was used for this proposed building. The GTE
Credit Union has been identified as the occupant for the drive-in bank land use. Their facility
will close at 5 :00 P.M. every weekday. This will limit their impact in the PM peak hour which
runs from 4:00 to 6:00 P.M. The general light industrial building proposed for this site will be
occupied by the St. Petersburg Times and will be used as a distribution center for their
newspaper. Since this is a morning delivery paper, their hours of operation are from midnight to
7:00 a.m. Therefore, their PM peak hour trip generation will be zero. No trips for this land use
have been estimated during the PM peak hour, but daily traffic volume have been estimated.
Table 1 summarizes the trip generation for the existing approved development and the proposed
land uses. As is indicated the existing land use is projected to generate 177 daily and 25 PM
peak hour trips. The proposed land uses are projected to generate 1,313 daily and 211 PM peak
hour trips.
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I. ~
___ IV
U
C
<1>
I .~
~ E
o
'"'
Ii)
I~
,-~ 0
o
N
I~
"- z
I
-
--
SUNSET POINT ROAD
CALUMET STREET
~
~
~
CI)
lLJ
:S
u
Q::
lLJ
::r:
Cl
~
a
Q::
Q::
lLJ
::r:
u
-.I
lLJ
CQ
N
NOT TO
SCALE
DREW
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
PROJECT No.
699-190
10>
;0
u
>-
t )"0
---- :>
v;
I. ]
! I
--' 0
/
2
I ~ DESCRIPTION,
,----, 0
-0
o
If
/"
'"
~ FLq!!.!~~. ~~~!!:t!AL~C?'!u~tt~:: ~"!LI~~R!NC.
6321 Grand Blvd, New Pori Richey FL 34652
Tel, (727) 849-7588 - Fax, (727) 848-3648
DATE,
11/20/03
DRAWN BY,
JMS
Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission.
@Copyright 2003 Florida Design Consultants. Inc.
STREET
EPN,
101
FIGURE,
1
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
o
:;:;
ra
I-
C1l
C
C1l
C)
0.
"i:
I-
:1
I
....
o
C1l
'0'
I-
a..
I
T"'"
C1l
.0
ra
I-
I
I
WOo
I--::J"-
- -1 ..-
co
-
o
I--
L-
:J
O-oN
ICN
..:.:: :J
CO 0
<D:8
0... :J
20
0...
-0(")
C
:J
o
.n
C
I"-
>>1"-
- ..-
CO
o
en~
;t=LL
C rr
::JCf)
I.()
<D..-
,t::! .q-~
Cf)1.()
N
CO
oc
-
en
:J
<D-o
en C
::J
-0
C
CO
-1
-
J::
0>
:.:i
CO
L-
<D
C
<D
C)
CO
>
o
L-
0.
0.
<t:
-
C
<D
L-
L-
:J
o
-
I.()
N
CO(")O..-
..- (J') ..-
..- N
I.() 1"-0..-
..- (J') ..-
..-
(")1"-00
(J') 0
..-
o (0 (0 (")
(0(")..-..-
N(J')..-(")
..-
.....; ~ ..;
LLLLLL
rrrrrr
Cf)Cf)Cf)
OCOO
oNo
o~ I.() 1"-_
N -(0
..-(")..-
ONO
..- ..- ..-
I"-(J')..-
!...
CO
oc
-
en
:J
-0
C
..:.::-
c~
~:.:i
C CO
<D oJ; a;
.~ > c
:t:: 0 C <D
ooC)
-0
<D
en
o
0.
o
L-
0...
..- 0..-..- 0
..- ..- (J') N
N N ..-
..- 0..- L{') <0
..- ..- "<:t <0
..- ..-
o OOI.()"<:t
o o"<:t L{')
..- ..-
..- ..-
C'? 0 C') 0 C')
..- ..- "<:t t---
C') (") "<:t co
<Den..:.::en
L-o.co.
:J oc CO "C
a.1--11l1--
co c
o co,, co
'" E <D E
\V <D > <D
Ex oc X
2woW
c E-
o <D
L-Z
'+-
<D
L-
:J
-
0.
co
o
>>
.0
I
en
en
co
0...
-0
<D
--
lIJ ctI
C1l L-
lIJ <D
::J a3
"'0<.9
C en
ra 0.
..J oc
"01-
C1l
lIJ
o
0-
o
L-
a.
-
o
&:
ra
;.,
...
>-
..c
I
lIJ
lIJ
ra
a.
"'0
C
ra
C1l
L-
::s
....
0-
ra
U
ra
s::
L-
C1l
....
s::
N
C1l
..c
ra
...
-3-
I.() L{')
N(J')
N"<:t
N"<:t
(") ..-
L{')
1"-<0
1"-0)
..- <0
co <D
> en
o co
L- <D
0.L-
o..()
<t: c
- 0..
C "C
~I--
:J <D
0:3
E-o
o c
~ co
en.....J
0.-0
'C <D
I-- en
o
0.
o
L-
a..
'.
en
0.
"C
-
L-
:J
o
J::
..:.::
co
<D
0.
2
0...
<D
-
co
L-
<D
C
<D
0>
-
o
c
.~
co
"C
-
en
:J
-0
C
C')
o
o
N
co
..-
L-
<D
.n
E
<D
>
o
Z
-
J::
0>
:.:i
co
L-
<D
C
<D
C)
-0
<D
en
o
0.
o
L-
0...
-l<
<D
-
co
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0
I
I
6.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
.
4.0
INTERNAL AND PASS-BY CAPTURE
The mix of land uses proposed for this site may have some of their trips that are generated by
one land use on site going to other land use on site. This internal capture could occur between
the office and credit union land uses. To be conservative, no subcontractors for internal capture
have been made for this analysis.
A number of trips already traveling on the adjacent roads may turn into the site to use the credit
union. These pass-by trips have been recognized by ITE and estimates on the amount of these
trips by land use type are provided in their Trip Generation Handbook dated March 2001.
According to Table 5.26 provided on Page 71 of that document, approximately 47 percent of the
traffic to Drive-in Banks (ITE LUC 912) comes from pass-by traffic. It is assumed that 47
percent of the trips to the. credit union will come from traffic already on Calumet Street or
Belcher Road. The internal capture and pass-by trips are summarized in Table 2. As is
indicated, following the pass-by capture, the project is expected to add 873 daily trips and 120
PM peak hour trips to the highway network. This is an increase of 696 daily and 95 PM peak
hour trips above the current approval.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip distribution to this site has been estimated using information from the traffic counts taken
for this project. Based on the existing traffic patterns for traffic entering and exiting Calumet
Street at Belcher Road, the trip distribution for project traffic has been estimated and is shown in
Figure 2.
EXISTING TRAFFIC
Existing traffic volumes at the Belcher Road and Calumet Street intersection were counted from
4:00 to 6:00 P.M. on Wednesday, November 12, 2003. A copy ofthe traffic count is provided in
the Appendix. The PM peak hour, defined as the four consecutive 15 minute periods with the
highest volumes, was from 5:00 to 6:00 P.M. This count was adjusted to annual average
conditions using the appropriate "SF" factor from the Florida Department of Transportation's
(FDOT's) 2002 Peak Season Factor Category Report for Pinellas Countywide data sheet, see
copy in the Appendix. For the week of November 10 through 16, 2002, the adjustment was to
increase the traffic count by a factor of 1.04. This was applied to all traffic volumes entering the
intersection. At the time the traffic count was taken the existing facility on the project site was
not open, therefore, the traffic count represents only background or non-project traffic.
-4-
:;::-
2
I! DESCRIPTION,
--, 2
o
o
If
_u /'
""'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~
-.- Q)
u
c
C1>
I .~
_u E
o
<Xl
I~
---- 0
o
N
I~
-- z
I
Ii
,---' :J
if)
u
1:1
.
~
<::{
o
ct:
...... CD
~
~
,17
CALUMET STREET 1
33 ---!!
30, 0,
ii
ot')
t')t')
1
PROJECT
SITE
......
t')
CD
37
,
ct:
Ll.J
:r::
u
-.I
Ll.J
CO
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION (PERCENT)
~ FLqt!.!~~. ~~~!~!:!AL~C?~~tt~!:~'tLI~h!NC.
6321 Grand Blvd, New Pori Richey FL 34652
Tel, (727) 849-7588 - Fox, (727) 848-3648
@Copyright 2003 Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
PROJECT No.
699-190
DATE,
11/20/03
DRAWN BY,
JMS
N
NOT TO
SCALE
EPN,
101
FIGURE,
2
Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission.
I
I
II
7.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
-
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
7.1 BELCHER ROAD AT CALUMET STREET INTERSECTION
This existing traffic volumes and trips from the existing approved uses and proposed uses
for this project are indicated in Figure 3 and have been analyzed to determine the
expected Level of Service (LOS). Analysis of this unsignalized intersection has been
completed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS 2000). The results are
summarized in Table 3 and copies of the print outs from this analysis are provided in the
Appendix.
Table 3. Belcher Road at Calumet Street Unsignalized Intersection Operation.
Existing Background Plus Background Plus
Background Existing Approved Proposed Proj ect
Traffic Project Traffic Traffic
Level of Service F F F
Approach Delay (Seconds) 66.2 77.0 109.5
95% Queue Length (Vehicles) 4.6 5.26 6.69
As can be seen from the above table, the intersection is projected to operate at LOS F
either with the existing approved land use on the project site or with the proposed land
uses. As mentioned earlier, the credit union will be closed at 5 :00 p.m. which is prior to
the counted peak hour period which ran from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. If the traffic from the
credit union is subtracted, the net change in volume would be insignificant.
The above review indicated that this unsignalized intersection would not operate at an
acceptable level of service. This intersection's poor operation results from the high
traffic volumes on Belcher Road that do not provide significant gaps in the traffic to
allow traffic from Calumet Street to enter Belcher Road. An improvement to Keene
Road that will extend it to Sunset Point Road will be open soon. This will help reduce
traffic volumes on Belcher Road, thereby increasing the size of gaps in traffic allowing
turning movement from Calumet Street to be made easier.
Most of the delay to vehicles on Calumet Street trying to enter Belcher Road comes from
Traffic turning left which must first cross both southbound lanes on Belcher Road before
entering the northbound traffic stream. If these vehicles experience excessive delay, they
can travel westbound on Calumet Street to Hercules Avenue where an existing traffic
signal would provide easier entry into the northbound traffic stream.
-6-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iv
-- -~ 0
c
.,
I .~
----- 0
"-
If)
I;
___J 0
o
N
I~
II
>.
'-- -g
Vi
I~I
'_n__ 0
./
~
N
NOT TO
SCALE
Q
"':::(
ata
~n=
~I:g
+~
~ II
II~
NO
v~
j !
CALUMET STREET
Q
----"':::(
~a
____~ n=
Ola)
'---'0
+~
~ II
IIg
00
l[)~
j !
CALUMET STREET
1 i
74=67+ 1-.1
57=57+Q ....
1 i
~I at
+ +
.....Ol
tOo
II ~
a)N
ct: to II
LlJ Ol
::t:: 0
t..> N
-.I
LlJ
Cl:l
EXISTING PM
PEAK HOUR
LEGEND
82=67+(15) -.1
57=57+(0) ....
xx - EXISTING AADT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
XX - EXISTING APPROVED PROJECT TRAFFIC
(XX) - PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC
I ! DESCRIPTION,
-- .8
o
o
I~
~ - /'
,::
I
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
~ FLq!!!~~. R~~!!f!:!AL~t?~~V~~:: ~f-!LI~h!NC.
6321 Grand Blvd, New Pori Richey FL 34652
Tel, (727) 849-7588 - Fax, (727) 848-3648
@Copyright 2003 Florida Design Consultonts, Inc.
.--.... ----
010
~ '---'
'---'+
+Ol
.....0
to ~
ct: II N
LlJ to II
::t:: a) 8
t..>
-.I
LlJ
Cl:l
N
PROJECTED PM
PEAK HOUR
PROJECT No.
699-190
DA TE.
11/20/03
DRAWN BY,
JMS
EPN,
101
FIGURE,
3
Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission.
I
I
. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
e
8.0
LINK ANALYSIS
A review has been made of the link level of service on both Belcher Road and Calumet Street
with the proposed project. The project traffic volumes and projected level of service are
indicated in Table 4. The maximum service volumes for levels of service have been obtained
from the FDOT Quality/Level of Service Manual 2002, see Generalized Peak/Hour Directional
Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas Table contained in the Appendix.
Table 4. Link: of Level of Service
Road Direction LOSD Existing Proposed Total LOS
Max. Service Volume Traffic Project Trips Traffic
Belcher Road NB 1,860 2,176 19 2,195 F
Belcher Road SB 1,860 1,123 17 1,140 B
Calumet Street EB 760 124 15 139 C
Calumet Street WE 760 108 28 136 C
While the northbound direction of Belcher Road carries more traffic than the FDOT generalized
service volume tables indicate is acceptable, the amount of traffic contributed by the proposed
development is relatively minor. Project traffic contributes less than one percent of the total
traffic in the northbound direction. Additionally the improvement to Keene Road sited above is
likely to reduce traffic volumes on Belcher Road, which should allow it to return to acceptable
operating conditions. The other road segments all worked at acceptable LOS D or better
conditions.
9.0 CONCLUSION
Based upon the above review, it has been demonstrated that the traffic impact likely to result
from the proposed land use changes in the southwest quadrant of the Belcher Road and Calumet
Street intersection are likely to be minor. An alternative entrance and exist using Calumet Street
to Hercules Avenue could be used by traffic on Calumet Street during peak periods to avoid
delay at the Calumet/Belcher intersection. Additionally an improvement to Keene Road that will
open soon is likely to reduce traffic volumes on Belcher Road, thereby improving area
operations. It is believed that the impact from the proposed development is so minor that
approval should be granted for this land use change.
:es
K:\Belcher at Calumet\Reports\Traffic Study.doc
-8-
- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
1__,
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
PM PEAK HOUR DATA
PROJECT:
OEM Partnership
PROJECT NO:
699-190
LOCATION:
(N-S) Belcher Road
&
(E-W)
Calumet Street
DATE:
Wednesday, November 12, 2003
LANE TYPE:
SPEED LIMIT:
NB
SB
EB
WB
2L
2L
1L
NB
SB
EB
WB
45
-
45
30
PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS
TIME
PM
NB
L
NB
T
NB
R
SB
L
SB
T
SB
R
EB
L
EB
T
EB
R
WB
L
WB
T
WB TOTAL HOURLY
R VOLUME VOLUMES
---------------------------------------------~
4:00-4: 15 13 383 215 9 13 8 641 641
4:15-4:30 6 359 239 11 6 7 628 1,269
4:30-4:45 24 431 248 6 24 23 756 2,025
4:45-5:00 14 394 253 9 14 16 700 2,725
5:00-5: 15 18 531 268 16 18 19 870 2,954
5: 15-5:30 10 520 258 8 10 6 812 3,138
5:30-5:45 25 520 279 5 25 25 879 3,261
5:45-6:00 11 457 235 10 11 5 729 3,290
-----------------
121 3,595 0 0 1,995 74 121 0 109 0 0 0 6,015
PEAK HOUI:! TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL
PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME
-----------------------
5:00-5: 15 18 531 0 0 268 16 18 0 19 0 0 0 870
5:15-5:30 10 520 0 0 258 8 10 0 6 0 0 0 812
5:30-5:45 25 520 0 0 279 5 25 0 25 0 0 0 879
5:45-6:00 11 457 0 0 235 10 11 0 5 0 0 0 729
--------------------------
64 2,028 0 0 1,040 39 64 0 55 0 0 0 3,290
INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 5:00 - 6:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.93572
INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 3,290
PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 2,092 PHF NB 0.95
PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 1,079 PHF SB 0.95
PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 119 PHF EB 0.60
PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 0 PHF WB #OIV/O!
NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB
L T R L T R L T R L T R
2003 Traffi Count 64 2,028 0 0 1,040 39 64 0 55 0 0 0 3,290
2003 Annual Avg. Traffic 67 2,109 0 0 1,082 41 67 0 57 0 0 0 3,422
Note: Season Factor = 1.04
T:1699-190ITraffic Countsl[Belcher Calumet.xls]Sheet1
1
/1"
I Print Date: N?v/18/2003 . Florida Department of Transportation e
Transportation Statistics Office
2002 Peak Season Factor Category Report
I PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCF = 0.94
i_Category: 1500 Week Dates SF PSCF
I OliO lI2002 - 0 lI05/2002 1.06 1.l3
I 2 Oll06/2002 - Olll2/2002 1.05 1.l2
3 Oll13/2002 - Oll19/2002 1.04 1.l1
4 o lI20/2002 - 0 lI26/2002 1.02 1.09
I 5 Oll27/2002 - 02/02/2002 1.00 1.06
6 02/03/2002 - 02/09/2002 0.98 1.04
* 7 02/10/2002 - 02/16/2002 0.96 1.02
* 8 02/17/2002 - 02/23/2002 0.95 1.01
I * 9 02/24/2002 - 03/02/2002 0.94 1.00
* 10 03/03/2002 - 03/09/2002 0.93 0.99
* 11 03/10/2002 - 03/16/2002 0.92 0.98
I * 12 03/17/2002 - 03/23/2002 0.92 0.98
* 13 03/24/2002 - 03/30/2002 0.93 0.99
* 14 03/3l12002 - 04/06/2002 0.93 0.99
* 15 04/07/2002 - 04/13/2002 0.94 1.00
I * 16 04/14/2002 - 04/20/2002 0.94 1.00
* 17 04/2l12002 - 04/27/2002 0.95 1.01
* 18 04/28/2002 - 05/04/2002 0.96 1.02
I * 19 05/05/2002 - 05/1l12002 0.97 1.03
20 05/12/2002 - 05/18/2002 0.99 1.05
21 05/19/2002 - OS/25/2002 0.99 1.05
I 22 OS/26/2002 - 06/0ll2002 0.99 1.05
23 06/02/2002 - 06/08/2002 1.00 1.06
24 06/09/2002 - 06/15/2002 1.00 1.06
25 06/16/2002 - 06/22/2002 1.00 1.06
I 26 06/23/2002 - 06/29/2002 1.00 1.06
27 06/30/2002 - 07/06/2002 1.00 1.06
28 07/07/2002 - 07/13/2002 1.01 1.07
I 29 07/14/2002 - 07/20/2002 1.01 1.07
30 07/2l12002 - 07/27/2002 1.01 1.07
31 07/28/2002 - 08/03/2002 1.01 1.07
I 32 08/04/2002 - 08/10/2002 1.01 1.07
33 08/11/2002 - 08/17/2002 1.02 1.09
34 08/18/2002 - 08/24/2002 1.03 1.l0
35 08/25/2002 - 08/31/2002 1.03 1.l0
I 36 09/0ll2002 - 09/07/2002 1.04 1.l1
37 09/08/2002 - 09/14/2002 1.05 1.l2
38 09/15/2002 - 09/2l12002 1.06 1.l3
I 39 09/22/2002 - 09/28/2002 1.05 1.l2
40 09/29/2002 - 10/05/2002 1.04 1.l1
41 10/06/2002 - 10/12/2002 1.03 1.l0
42 10/13/2002 - 10/19/2002 1.02 1.09
I 43 10/20/2002 - 10/26/2002 1.02 1.09
44 10/27/2002 - Il102/2002 1.03 1.l0
45 Il103/2002 - 11/09/2002 1.03 1.l0
:1 46 11/10/2002 - 11/16/2002 1.04 1.l1
47 Il117/2002 - 11/23/2002 1.04 1.l1
48 Il124/2002 - 11130/2002 1.05 1.l2
I 49 12/01/2002 - 12/07/2002 1.05 1.l2
50 12/08/2002 - 12/14/2002 1.06 1.l3
51 12/15/2002 - 12/2l12002 1.06 1.l3
52 12/22/2002 - 12/28/2002 1.05 1.l2
I 53 12/29/2002 - 12/3l12002 1.04 1.l1
I Note: "*" indicates peak season week Page
I
-
e
I
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
I
Analyst: REC
Agency / Co. : FDC
Date Performed: 11/18/2003
Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2003 without Project
Project ID: DEM Partnership
East/West Street: Calumet Street
North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs):
0.25
I
I
Vehicle
Approach
Movement 1
L
Volumes and
Northbound
2
T
Adjustments
Major Street:
I
Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
Southbound
4 5 6
L T R
1082 41
0.95 0.95
1138 43
2 0
T TR
No
Eastbound
10 11 12
L T R
67 0 57
0.95 0.95 0.95
70 0 60
1 0 1
0
No
0 1 0
LTR
Service
Eastbound
10 11 12
LTR
130
178
0.73
4.60
66.2
F
66.2
F
I
3
R
I
Volume 67
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1
Configuration L
Upstream Signal?
2109
0.95
2220
I
2
T
No
I
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Westbound
7 8 9
L T R
o
I
1
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
I
I
Approach
Movement
Lane Config
Delay,
NB
1
L
Queue Length, and Level of
SB Westbound
4 7 8 9
I
v (vph)
C (m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
70
593
0.12
0.40
11.9
B
I
I
I
:1
:1
/.~..?
{1 ,/
I
-
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c
I.
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
I
Analyst: REC
Agency /Co. : FDC
Date Performed: 11/18/2003
Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2003 without Project
Project ID: DEM Partnership
East/West Street: Calumet Street
North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS
Study period (hrs): 0.25
I
I
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume 67 2109 1082 41
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Peak-15 Minute Volume 18 555 285 11
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70 2220 1138 43
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1 2 2 0
Configuration L T T TR
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume 67 0 57
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95
Peak-15 Minute Volume 18 0 15
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 70 0 60
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 0 1
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists? No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1 0
Configuration LTR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments
Movements 13 14 15 16
Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0
I
I
Upstream Signal Data
Sat Arrival Green Cycle
Flow Type Time Length
vph see see
Prog.
Speed
mph
Distance
to Signal
feet
Prog.
Flow
vph
I
S2 Left-Turn
Through
S5 Left-Turn
Through
I
Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles
Movement 2
Movement 5
I
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
I
I
fi~
; ;
I
e
I
e e
Worksheet 4-Cri tical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation
Critical Gap Calculation
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
L L L T R L T R
t(c,base) 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9
t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
P(hv) 1 1 0 1
t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10
Grade/lOa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
t(3,lt) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00
t (c, T) : I-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-stage 0.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00
t (c) I-stage 4.1 6.8 6.5 6.9
2-stage 4.1 5.8 5.5 6.9
Follow-Up Time Calculations
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
L L L T R L T R
t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30
t (f,HV) 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
P(HV) 1 1 0 1
t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3
I
I
I
I
I
I
Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals
Computation I-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal
Movement 2
V(t) V(l,prot)
Movement 5
V(t) V(l,prot)
I
I
V prog
Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph)
Arrival Type
Effective Green, g (sec)
Cycle Length, C (sec)
Rp (from Exhibit 16-11)
Proportion vehicles arriving on green P
g(ql)
g(q2)
g(q)
I
I
Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked
Movement 2 Movement S
V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot)
I
alpha
beta
Travel time, t (a) (sec)
Smoothing Factor, F
Proportion of conflicting flow, f
Max platooned flow, V(c,max)
Min platooned flow, V(c,min)
Duration of blocked period, t(p)
Proportion time blocked, p
0.000
0.000
I
Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods
Result
I
0.000
0.000
I
p(2)
piS)
p(dom)
p (sOOo)
Constrained or unconstrained?
I
Proportion
unblocked
for minor
movements, p(x)
(1)
Single-stage
Process
(2) (3)
Two-Stage Process
Stage I Stage II
:1
p(l)
p(4)
p(7)
p(8)
p(9)
p(10)
pill)
p(12)
I
I
;\ ~~
'1"- '::;)
I
--
.
I
Computation 4 and 5
single-Stage Process
Movement
1
L
4
L
7
L
8
T
9
R
10
L
11
T
12
R
I
v c,x
s
Px
V c,u,x
1181
2410
3520
590
C r,x
C plat,x
I
Two-Stage Process
I
7
Stagel Stage2
8
Stagel Stage2
10
Stage1 Stage2
11
Stage1 Stage2
V(c,x)
s
P(x)
V(c,u,x)
1160
1250
3400
1160
2360
3400
I
C(r,x)
C(plat,x)
I
Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
9 12
590
453
1. 00 1. 00
453
1. 00 0.87
4 1
1181
593
1. 00 1. 00
.593
1.00 0.88
8 11
3520
6
1. 00 1. 00
0.88 0.88
5
1. 00 1. 00
7 10
2410
28
1. 00 1. 00
0.88
0.91
0.79 0.88
25
I
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Step 2: LT from Major St.
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St.
I
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
I
. ,
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
I
Step 4: LT from Minor St.
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
I
Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
8
11
I
I
Part 1 - First Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
69
1. 00
0.88
61
1. 00
1160
272
1. 00
1. 00
272
1. 00
Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
266
1. 00
1. 00
2360
69
1. 00
0.88
I
I
.\ I
R'b
I
e -
Movement Capacity 266 61
Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows 3520
Potential Capacity 6
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.88 0.88
Movement Capacity 5
Result for 2 stage process:
a 0.91 0.91
y 4.77
C t 47
Probability of Queue free St. 1. 00 1. 00
Step 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10
Part 1 - First Stage
Conflicting Flows 1160
Potential Capacity 59 263
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.88 1. 00
Movement Capacity 52 263
Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows 1250
Potential Capacity 535 235
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.88
Movement Capacity 464 207
Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows 2410
Potential Capacity 28
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.88
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.91
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.79 0.88
Movement Capacity 25
Results for Two-stage process:
a 0.91 0.91
y 1. 31
C t 117
Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (vph) 70 0 60
Movement Capacity (vph) 117 47 453
Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 178
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches
II
Movement 7 8 9
L T R
C sep
Volume
Delay
Q sep
Q sep +1
round (Qsep +1)
n max
C sh
SUM C sep
n
C act
Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
10
L
11
T
12
R
117
70
47
o
453
60
I
I
178
I
I
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Config L LTR
v (vph) 70 130
C(m) (vph) 593 178
Ii ")
I
I
.
e
I
vlc 0.12
95% queue length 0.40
Control Delay 11.9
LOS B
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
0.73
4.60
66.2
F
66.2
F
I
Worksheet II-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
I
!1ovement 2
Movement 5
I
p (oj)
v(il) ,
v(i2) ,
s (il),
s (i2) ,
P*(oj)
d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4
N, Number of major street through
d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5
Volume for
Volume for
Saturation
Saturation
stream 2 or 5
stream 3 or 6
flow rate for
flow rate for
stream 2 or 5
stream 3 or 6
0.88
1. 00
11. 9
lanes
I
T:\699-190\HCS Runs\Belcher Calumet wo Project.doc
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fIe 7
I
-
,tt
I
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
I
Analyst: REC
Agency/Co.: FDC
Date Performed: 11/18/2003
Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2003 with Existing Approval
Project ID: DEM Partnership
East/West Street: Calumet Street
North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs):
0.25
I
I
Vehicle
Approach
Movement 1
L
Volumes and Adjustments
Northbound
2 3
T R
Major Street:
I
Volume 68
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1
Configuration L
Upstream Signal?
2109
0.95
2220
Southbound
4 5 6
L T R
1082 42
0.95 0.95
1138 44
2 0
T TR
No
Eastbound
10 11 12
L T R
74 0 57
0.95 0.95 0.95
77 0 60
1 0 1
0
No
0 1 0
LTR
Service
Eastbound
10 11 12
LTR
137
173
0.79
5.26
77.0
F
77.0
F
I
I
2
T
No
I
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Westbound
789
L T R
I
Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
o
I
1
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
I
I
Approach
Movement
Lane Config
Delay,
NB
1
L
Queue Length, and Level of
SB Westbound
4 7 8 9
I
v (vph)
C (m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
71
592
0.12
0.41
11.9
B
I
I
I
I
I
(4
9
I
e
.
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c
I
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
I
Analyst: REC
Agency / Co. : FDC
Date Performed: 11/18/2003
Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2003 with Existing Approval
Project 10: OEM Partnership
East/West Street: Calumet Street
North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
I
I
I
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume 68 2109 1082 42
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Peak-15 Minute Volume 18 555 285 11
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71 2220 1138 44
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1 2 2 0
Configuration L T T TR
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume 74 0 57
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95
Peak-15 Minute Volume 19 0 15
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 77 0 60
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 0 1
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists? No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1 0
Configuration LTR
I
I
I
I
I
I
Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments
Movements 13 14 15 16
Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0
I
I
Prog.
Flow
vph
Upstream Signal Data
Sat Arrival Green Cycle
Flow Type Time Length
vph sec sec
Prog.
Speed
mph
Distance
to Signal
feet
I
S2 Left-Turn
Through
S5 Left-Turn
Through
I
Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles
Movement 2
Movement 5
I
I
Shared ln volume, major th vehicles:
Shared 1n volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
I
A".
r->
.~./
I
e .
Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation
Critical Gap Calculation
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
L L L T R L T R
t(c,base) 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9
t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
P(hv) 1 1 0 1
t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10
Grade/lOO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
t (3,lt) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00
t (c,T): I-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2-stage 0.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00
t(c) I-stage 4.1 6.8 6.5 6.9
2-stage 4.1 5.8 5.5 6.9
Follow-Up Time Calculations
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
L L L T R L T R
t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30
t(f,HV) 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
P(HV) 1 1 0 1
t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3
I
I
I
I
I
I
Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals
Computation I-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal
Movement 2
V(t) V(l,prot)
Movement 5
V(t) V(l,prot)
I
I
V prog
Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph)
Arrival Type
Effective Green, g (see)
Cycle Length, C (see)
Rp (from Exhibit 16--11)
Proportion vehicles arriving on green P
g(ql)
g(q2)
g(q)
I
I
Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked
Movement 2 Movement 5
V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot)
I
alpha
beta
Travel time, t (a) (see)
Smoothing Factor, F
Proportion of conflicting flow, f
Max platooned flow, V(c,max)
Min platooned flow, V(c,min)
Duration of blocked period, t(p)
Proportion time blocked, p
0.000
0.000
I
Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods
Result
I
I
p(2)
p(5)
p(dom)
p(subo)
Constrained or unconstrained?
0.000
0.000
I
Proportion
unblocked
for minor
movements, p (x)
(1)
Single-stage
Process
(2) (3)
Two-Stage Process
Stage I Stage II
!I
P (1)
p(4)
P (7)
P (8)
P (9)
P (10)
p(l1)
p (12)
;1
I
A
- f
I
e
I
Computation 4 and 5
Single-Stage Process
Movement
4
L
1
L
I
v c,x
s
Px
V c,u,x
1182
I
C r,x
C plat,x
Two-Stage Process
I
7
Stagel Stage2
8
Stage 1 Stage2
V(c,x)
s
P(x)
V(c,u,x)
I
C(r,x)
C(plat,x)
I
.
7
L
8
T
9
R
11
T
12
R
10
L
2412
3522
591
10
Stage1 Stage2
11
Stagel Stage2
1160
1252
3400
1160
2362
3400
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
I
Step 2: LT from Major St.
:1
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St.
I
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
II
Step 4: LT from Minor St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
I
I
1___-'
9 12
591
453
1. 00 1. 00
453
1. 00 0.87
4 1
1182
592
1. 00 1. 00
592
1. 00 0.88
8 11
3522
6
1. 00 1. 00
0.88 0.88
5
1. 00 1. 00
7 10
2412
28
1. 00 1. 00
0.88
0.91
0.79 0.88
25
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance
11
I
Part 1 - First Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
I
I
Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
I
8
69
1. 00
0.88
61
1. 00
1160
272
1. 00
1. 00
272
1. 00
266
1. 00
1. 00
2362
69
1. 00
0.88
-,
I~
/'''1
, '
~~-
I
- e
Movement Capacity 266 61
Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows 3522
Potential Capacity 6
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.88 0.88
Movement Capacity 5
Result for 2 stage process:
a 0.91 0.91
y 4.77
C t 47
Probability of Queue free St. 1. 00 1. 00
Step 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10
Part 1 - First Stage
Conflicting Flows 1160
Potential Capacity 58 263
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.88 1. 00
Movement Capacity 51 263
Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows 1252
Potential Capacity 535 235
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.88
Movement Capacity 464 207
Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows 2412
Potential Capacity 28
Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.88
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.91
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.79 0.88
Movement Capacity 25
Results for Two-stage process:
a 0.91 0.91
Y 1. 31
C t 117
Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (vph) 77 0 60
Movement Capacity (vph) 117 47 453
Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 173
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches
I
Movement 7 8 9
L T R
C sep
Volume
Delay
Q sep
Q sep +l
round (Qsep +1)
n max
C sh
SUM C sep
n
C act
Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
10
L
11
T
12
R
117
77
47
o
453
60
I
I
173
I
I
Movement
Lane Config
1
L
4
7
8
9
10
11
LTR
12
v (vph)
C (m) (vph)
71
592
137
173
I
A ~/3
I
.
I
vlc 0.12
95% queue length 0.41
Control Delay 11.9
LOS B
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
I
Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
I
p(oj)
v(il) ,
v(i2) ,
s (il),
s (i2),
P*(oj)
d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4
N, Number of major street through
d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5
Volume for
Volume for
Saturation
Saturation
stream 2 or 5
stream 3 or 6
flow rate for
flow rate for
I
I
T:\699-190\HCS Runs\Belcher Calumet w Exist ApprovaI.doc
I
I
I
'-~
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
stream 2 or 5
stream 3 or 6
lanes
f) \ 4,
Movement 2
0.88
11.9
-
0.79
5.26
77.0
F
77.0
F
Movement 5
1. 00
I
-
.
I
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lc
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
I
Analyst: REC
Agency/Co.: FDC
Date Performed: 11/18/2003
Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2003 with Proposed Project
Project ID: DEM Partnership
East/West Street: Calumet Street
North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
I
I
Major Street:
Vehicle
Approach
Movement 1
L
Volumes and Adjustments
Northbound
2 3
T R
,I
Volume 86
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 90
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1
Configuration L
Upstream Signal?
2109
0.95
2220
Southbound
4 5 6
L T R
1090 50
0.95 0.95
1147 52
2 0
T TR
No
Eastbound
10 11 12
L T R
82 0 57
0.95 0.95 0.95
86 0 60
1 0 1
0
No
0 1 0
LTR
Service
Eastbound
10 11 12
LTR
146
158
0.92
6.69
109.5
F
109.5
F
I
I
2
T
No
I
Minor Street: Approach
Movement
Westbound
789
L T R
I
Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
Median Storage
Flared Approach:
o
I
1
Exists?
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
I
Delay,
NB
1
L
Queue Length, and Level of
SB Westbound
4 7 8 9
I
Approach
Movement
Lane Config
I
v (vph)
C(m) (vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
90
584
0.15
0.54
12.3
B
I
I
I
I
I
A
I ,::::
..-/
I
-
e
I
Computation 4 and 5
Single-Stage Process
Movement
1
L
4
L
7
L
8
T
9
R
10
L
11
T
12
R
I
V c,x
s
Px
V c,u,x
1199
2463
3573
600
I
C r,x
C plat,x
Two-Stage Process
I
7
Stagel Stage2
8
Stagel Stage2
10
Stagel Stage2
11
Stagel Stage2
I
V(c,x)
s
P(x}
V(c,u,x)
1173
1290
3400
1173
2400
3400
C(r,x)
C(plat,x)
I
Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
9 12
600
447
1. 00 1. 00
447
1. 00 0.87
4 1
1199
584
1. 00 1. 00
584
1. 00 0.85
8 11
3573
6
1. 00 1. 00
0.85 0.85
5
1. 00 1. 00
7 10
2463
25
1. 00 1. 00
0.85
0.88
0.76 0.85
21
I
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St.
I
I
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
I
Step 4: LT from Minor St.
I
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
I
Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
8
11
I
I
Part 1 - First Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
66
1. 00
0.85
56
1. 00
1173
268
1. 00
1. 00
268
1. 00
I
Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap_ Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
261
1. 00
1. 00
2400
66
1. 00
0.85
I
Ii
'6
I
-
I
Movement Capacity
I
Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
.
261
56
1. 00
0.85
3573
6
1. 00
0.85
5
I
Result for 2 stage process:
a
0.91
0.91
5.16
44
1. 00
y
C t
Probability of Queue free St.
1. 00
I
Step 4: LT from Minor St.
10
7
I
Part 1 - First Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
56
1. 00
0.85
47
1173
258
1. 00
1. 00
258
I
Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
pedestrian Impedance Factor
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
I
533
1. 00
0.87
461
1290
224
1. 00
0.85
189
Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
I
I
1. 00
0.85
0.88
0.76
2463
25
1. 00
0.85
21
Results for Two-stage process:
a
0.91
0.91
1.41
109
y
C t
I
Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations
12
R
Movement
I
7
L
8
T
9
R
10
L
11
T
60
447
Volume (vph)
Movement Capacity (vph)
Shared Lane Capacity (vph)
I
86
109
o
44
158
I
Movement
Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches
10
L
7
L
8
T
9
R
11
T
12
R
I
C sep
Volume
Delay
Q sep
Q sep +1
round (Qsep +1)
109
86
44
o
447
60
I
158
I
n rnax
C sh
SUM C sep
n
C act
I
Movement
Lane Config
7
Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
12
1
L
4
8
9
10
11
LTR
v (vph)
C (m) (vph)
90
584
I
A \ (1
146
158
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals
Computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal
Movement 2
V(t) V(l,prot)
Movement 5
V(t) V(l,prot)
I
I
V prog
Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph)
Arrival Type
Effective Green, g (see)
Cycle Length, C (see)
Rp (from Exhibit 16-11)
Proportion vehicles arriving on green P
g(ql)
g(q2)
g(q)
I
I
Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked
Movement 2
V(t) V(l,prot)
Movement 5
V(t) V(l,prot)
alpha
beta
Travel time, t(a) (see)
Smoothing Factor, F
Proportion of conflicting flow, f
Max platooned flow, V(c,max)
Min platooned flow, V(c,min)
Duration of blocked period, t(p)
Proportion time blocked, p
0.000
0.000
I
I
Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods
Result
I
0.000
0.000
I
p(2)
p(5)
p(dom)
p (subo)
Constrained or unconstrained?
I
Proportion
unblocked
for minor
movements, p(x)
(1)
Single-stage
Process
(2) (3)
Two-Stage Process
Stage I Stage II
I
P (1)
p(4)
p(7)
P (8)
P (9)
P (10)
P (11)
p(12)
I
I
All
I
-
-
I
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.lc
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
I
Analyst: REC
Agency/Co.: FDC
Date Performed: 11/18/2003
Analysis Time period: PM Peak Hour
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2003 with Proposed Project
Project ID: DEM Partnership
East/West Street: Calumet Street
North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25
I
I
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume 86 2109 1090 50
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Peak-IS Minute Volume 23 555 287 13
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 90 2220 1147 52
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1
Median Type Raised curb
RT Channelized?
Lanes 1 2 2 0
Configuration L T T TR
Upstream Signal? No No
Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume 82 0 57
Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95
Peak-IS Minute Volume 22 0 15
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 86 0 60
Percent Heavy Vehicles 1 0 1
Percent Grade (%) 0 0
Median Storage 1
Flared Approach: Exists? No
Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes 0 1 0
Configuration LTR
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments
Movements 13 14 15 16
Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0
Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0
I
I
Prog.
Flow
vph
Upstream Signal Data
Sat Arrival Green Cycle
Flow Type Time Length
vph sec sec
Prog.
Speed
mph
Distance
to Signal
feet
I
S2 Left-Turn
Through
S5 Left-Turn
Through
I
Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles
Movement 2
Movement 5
I
I
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
I
A"/ b
I
-
e
I
vlc 0.15
95% queue length 0.54
Control Delay 12.3
LOS B
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
0.92
6.69
109.5
F
109.5
F
I
Worksheet ll-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
Movement 2
Movement 5
I
p(oj)
v(il) ,
v(i2) ,
s (il),
s (i2) ,
P*(oj)
d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4
N, Number of major street through
d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5
0.85
1. 00
:1
Volume for
Volume for
Saturation
Saturation
stream 2 or 5
stream 3 or 6
flow rate for
flow rate for
stream 2 or 5
stream 3 or 6
12.3
lanes
I
T:\699-190\HCS Runs\Belcher Calumet w Prop Proj.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;1 ),.~
I
e
-
I
TABLE 4 - 7
GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS*
I
UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS
FREEWAYS
I
Leve[ of Service Interchange spacing 2: 2 mi. apart
Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service
I Undivided 100 340 670 950 1,300 Lanes A B C D E
2 Divided [,060 1,720 2,500 3,230 3,670 2 1,270 2,110 2,940 3,580 3,980
3 Divided 1,600 2,590 3,740 4,840 5,500 3 [,970 3,260 4,550 5,530 6,150
STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS 4 2,660 4,410 6,150 7,480 8,320
Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) 5 3,360 5,560 7,760 9,440 10,480
Level of Service 6 4,050 6,710 9,360 11,390 12,650
Lanes Divided A B C D E
I Undivided ** 220 720 860 890 Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart
2 Divided 250 1,530 1,810 1,860 *** Level of Service
3 Divided 380 2,330 2,720 2,790 *** Lanes A B C D E
4 Divided 490 3,030 3,460 3,540 *** 2 1,130 1,840 2,660 3,440 3,910
3 1,780 2,890 4,[80 5,410 6,150
Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 4 2,340 3,940 5,700 7,380 8,380
Level of Service 5 3,080 4,990 7,220 9,340 10,620
Lanes Divided A B C D E 6 3,730 6,040 8,740 11,310 12,850
I Undivided ** 100 590 810 850
2 Divided ** 220 1,360 1,710 1,800 BICYCLE MODE
3 Divided ** 340 2,110 2,570 2,710
4 Divided ** 440 2,790 3,330 3,500 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of
Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
within primary city central business district of an by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.)
urbanized area over 750,000)
I
I
I
I
I
Paved Shoulder/ Level of Service
Level of Service Bicycle Lane
Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E
I Undivided ** ** 280 660 810 0-49% ** ** 170 720 >720
2 Divided ** ** 650 1,510 1,720 50-84% ** 130 210 >210 ***
3 Divided ** ** 1,020 2,330 2,580 85-100% 160 380 >380 *** ***
4 Divided ** ** 1,350 3,070 3,330
I
I
Level of Service
Lanes Divided A B C
I Undivided ** ** 270
2 Divided ** ** 650
3 Divided ** ** 1,000
4 Divided ** ** 1,350
D E
720 780 Level of Service
1,580 1,660 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
2,390 2,490 0-49% ** ** ** 330 810
3,130 3,250 50-84% ** ** ** 520 990
85-100% ** 120 590 >590 ***
PEDESTRIAN MODE
(Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not the number of
pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.)
I
Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within
primary city central business district of an urbanized area
over 750,000)
I
NON-STATEROADWAYS
Major City/County Roadways BUS l\IODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)
Level of Service (Buses per hour)
Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service
I Undivided ** ** 480 760 810 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
2 Divided ** ** 1,120 1,620 1,720 0-84% ** >5 2:4 2:3 2:2
3 Divided ** ** 1,740 2,450 2,580 85-100% >6 >4 2:3 2:2 2:1
I
I
Lanes Divided
I Undivided
2 Divided
Other Signalized Roadways
(signalized intersection analysis)
Level of Service
ABC
** ** 250
** ** 580
D
530
1,140
E
660
1,320
ARTERIAIJNON-ST A TE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS
DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED
(alter corresponding volumes by the indicated percent)
I
Source:
Florida Department of Transportation
Systems Planning Office
605 Suwannee Street, MS 19
Tallahassee, FL 3239941450
http://wwwll.myflorida.com/planning/systems/sm/los!default.htm
02/22/02
Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors
I Divided Yes +5%
I Undivided No -20"10
Multi Undivided Yes -5%
Multi Undivided No -25%
I
ONE WAY FACILITIES
Increase corresponding volume 20%
.This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning
applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Values shov,{l1 are hourly directional volumes for levels of
service and arc for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Le,,'el of service letter grade thresholds are probably not comparable across modes and, therefore, cross modal comparisons should be
made with caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of seryice is not recommended. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these.
volumes must be divided by appropriate D and K fJctors. The table's input value defaults and level of ser\;ce criteria appear on the following page. Calculations are based on planning applications of the
Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Modd and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service ~13nual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes.
-.Cannot be achieved using table input vaLue defaults.
-"'Not applicable for that level of service letter grJdc. For automobile/truck modes, volumes greater tha~ level of service D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle
and pedestrian modes, the blel of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum ychicle volume threshold using table input value defaults.
I
I
97
A J,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
-
-
COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
440 COURT STREET
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE: (727) 464-3251
n-: ""''''':0F'l T~T17\ 'D
it.,:.~ ~_,~ s.._-",:<c:_-~,_~JL -V J.2J
KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL - CHAIRMAN
SUSAN LATVALA - VICE CHAIRMAN
CALVIN D. HARRIS
JOHN MORRONI
ROBERT B. STEWART
BARBARA SHEEN TODD
KENNETH T. WELCH
MAY 2 0 2003
Utilization Permit #03-00320
May 19, 2003
-. ,-"-,-,,o'AS B ,."ry " 0'n"'\'mNS
i:,Lu ~'J'ih t 1\\,l.h, c<; ~~.~.u '/"_
L1overas, Baur & Stevens
29228 US Highway 19 North
Clearwater, FI. 33761
Attn: Michiel S. L1overas, PE
Re: Utilization Permit for OEM Partnership - Belcher Road & Calumet Street. (01/29/15)
Dear Mr. L1overas:
We are enclosing your approved Utilization Permit covering the proposed construction
described below:
Construct a driveway, sidewalk & storm drain connection on Belcher Road.
This letter must be attached to and made part of the approved Utilization Permit, making the
following conditions binding to the Permit:
1. It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to procure all necessary permits that are
required by the agencies that are affected by the proposed construction.
2. Contact Pine lias County Highway Inspector Gene Crosson prior to beginning work.
(Ph. #464-8900, 48 Hrs. Minimum Notice)
3. An eighteen (18) month maintenance bond may be required. The maintenance bond
must be a minimum of 20% of the completion bond with the owner/developer as
Principal.
Before this Permit becomes effective, it will be necessary to contact the Utility Notification
Center, "Call Sunshine", (1-800-432-4770) not less than 48 hours or more than five (5) days
prior to construction.
SinCffi;ely,
~,'1\,/
, ,
" ~', ':...." //
, i -'f, . :\
Patrick S. Fox-
Public Works Engineering Technician
Right-of-Way Utilization Permits
Permitting Services
Ipf
Enclosure/cc: Highway Department
-
"Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" · Member.Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace '-J printed on recycled paper
Plllellas County
Department of Public Works
-
03~ oo:::GD_
eRM1T NO
I
RIGHT OF WAY
UTILIZATION PERMIT
THE COUNTY OF PINELLAS, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter
called the Permitter, hereby grants to
Mark S. Klein
ofDEM Partnership, a Florida general partnership
(Street Address, City, State, Zip)
operateD, maintainD, renewD and/or removeD Improvement wi thin
(Name)
hereinafter called the Permittee, a Permit to constructQ(J,
the right-of-way of Belcher Road
on attached plan along, across, beneath, or over right of way
and/or property of Permitter at the following location
County Road No. 501 Name Belcher Road
situated at SW corner of Belcher Rd. & Calumet St.
(Address C(" Street Intersection)
Section 1
29
Township _ South
15
Range _ East,
. Florida, subject to the following provisions and conditions
2.
Construction, operation and maintenance of such utility SiBil not interfere with property and rights of prior occupant.
The construction, operation and maintenance of such utility shall not create obstruction or conditions which are or may become dangerous to
the traveling public.
4
5.
!\II \Nork ",';st be done in keeping with standards of the Florida Department of Transportation Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design.
Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways, Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Florida Department of Transportation standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, AASHTO and by the County Director or his agent
All materials and equipment shall be subject to rnspection by an Engineer of the County or his agent
The Permittee shall and does hereby agree to rndemnify, pay the cost of defense, and save harmless the Permitter from and against payment
of all claims, suits, actions, costs, attorneys' fees, expenses, damages, judgments, or decrees by reason of any person or persons or property
being damaged or injured by the permittee, his employees, agents or sub-contractors or in any way attributable to the performance, prosecution,
construction, operation, or maintenance of work herein permitted by Permitter and resulting from negligent acts or omiSSions of said Permittee
in connection with the work 11erein permitted
6.
The Permittee shall repair any damage or injUry to the road or highway or other County property by reason of the exercise of any of the privileges
granted in this Permit, and shall repair the same promptly, within seven (7) days of opening, restonng it to a condition at least equal to that which
existed immediately prior to the infliction of such damage or Injury (Note: All portions or the rrght of way other than paved areas disturbed by
the construction of this utility Will be compacted, grassed and mulched or sodded as required)
All overhead installations shall conform to clearance standards of the State Utilities Accommodation Guide and all underground crossing
installations shall be laid at a minimum depth of 36" below pavement, or at such greater depth as Permitter may require.
In the event of widening, repair or reconstruction of said road, the Permittee shall move or remove said utility Installation at no cost to the
Permitter.
This permit creates a permiSSive use only and the placing of facilities upon County property pursuant hereto shall not operate to create or to
vest any property rights In said Permitee and IS granted in perpetuity subject to termination by the Permitter upon the giVing of 30~days notice
in writing to the Permittee.
The Permittee shall furnish the Permitter with a survey showing tile exact locations of all facilities to be Installed pursuant to thiS permit, said
survey to be sufficiently detailed to aliow location of said installation by reference thereto
The attached plan, covering details of thiS installation, shall be a part of this permit.
7
8.
9.
10.
Upon completIon of instaliation, if field adjustments are made, an as-built drawing will have to be submitted
11 Section comer monuments subject to displacement shall first be rererenced and later reset by a Florida Registered Land Surveyor.
12 "''.11 activities in accordance with this permit will require conformance to the "Manual on Traffic Control and Safe Practices for street and Highway
Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations."' (Chapter 316 Florida Statutes)
13 The Permittee's attention is directed to the provisions of the Trench Safety Act (Florida Statutes, Section 55360 et seq) and the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration EXC3vat:cn Safety Standards (29 C.F.R. Section 1926.650] Subpart P) which shal1 apply to construction,
operation, and maintenance pursuant to thiS permit
14 Compaction within right of way to meet Plnellas County Minimum Standards.
15. Highway Department is to be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to beginning work at 464-8900, otheN/ise the Permit Will be VOided
16. If this permit is for a monitor well, copies of all testrng reports are to be fON/arded to the Pinellas County Highway Deptartment
17 The Permittee shannce c ithrn 60 days from the date of thiS permit and it shall be completed within l E>o days
Poem,n,eo,Age"' ~ A Pt,Ooo 1;1,1-1951 Dole ~f/,
Rev 9f8/99 Mark S.
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Description and nature of the propose_tallation shall be outlined In the two blank lines o_lication
2 The bottom of Application Sheet 1 shall be signed by applicant or his agent.
3. On the attached plan, the following data shall be supplied:
a. The plan shall show the right of way lines and the widths of right of way The offset distance from the centerline of the proposed
installation shall be shown and the scope of the proposed proJect, with all the distances and si.:::es clearly indicated
b. Typical cross section shall be furnished showing width of pavement, Width of right of way on each Side, offset distance from centerline
to proposed installation and any pertinent data to sidewalks, curbs and gutters, etc
48 HOUHS BEFORE YOU DIG
CALL SUNSHINE
d. All pertinent drainage information and calculations or Justification for si.:::e of pipe andrcf ~60 0 -432 -4770
All improvements within County maintained right of way shall conform to FlOrida Departme~J~Srlli€rtkAW~J}.jelii6Q9~<iDAPinellas
County Subdivision requirements
c
Indicate type of installation on both typical cross section and plan View.
4.
5.
All applications for water and sewer lines must be separate applications and countersigned by the utility Involved prior to submittal
6.
This form is to be made out in QUADRUPLICATE with four (4) drawings, one fully executed copy will be returned to you after approval
7.
There is a variable processing fee which must be received prior to the issuance of the permit Please make check payable to Board of County
Commissioners
8.
Due to the extensive work being done in Pinelias County right of way, ple2se provide proof that you meet the following insurance requirements
"Comprehensive General Liability Insurance including, but not limited to, Independent Contractor, Contractual, Premises/Operations,
Products/Completed Operation, Explosion, Collapse and Underground, and Personal InjUry covering the liability assumed under
indemnification proviSions of this permit, with limits of liability for personal l!lJury and/or bodily injury, including death, of not less than
$300,000, each occurrence; and property damage of not less than $100,000, each occurrence (Combined Single Limits of not less than
$300,000, each occurrence, will be acceptable unless otherwise stated.) Coverage shall be on an "occurrence" basis, and the policy shall
include Broad Form Property Damaqe coverage, and Fire Leqal liability of not less than $50,000 per occurrence, unless otherwise stated
by exception herein"
THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER "CALL SUNSHINE" (1-3004324770) MUST BE NOTIFIED 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Pinellas County Public Works
Permitting Services Section
440 Court Street, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FL 33756
(727l 464-3670
P U B, L It.... \t;i II q V S
j IV .1\..dd\
I~ I ~~J
UTILIZq,..~, r"-,, 'T('
. f-\',Ui'i reGii,)
I
I
1-
UTILITY COUNTERSIGN
(NamelTilfe)
I
I
(Uale)
Sod required
Open cut
TO BE FILLED OUT BY PINELLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
_ COMPACTION WITHIN
blr2Lt"T- ___
"'Clrl r Ur- WAY TO MEET
P/NElLAS COUNTY
M/NIMIIM Q,^ ......... ~__
Jack and bore 0 Y es O;;~~
Directional bore 0 Yes D110
~/ 0 No,
DYes
SEE ATTACHED LEDER FOR ADDITIOr'-JAL
CONDITIONS TO THIS UTILITY PERMIT
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, A
SIICjlG~)
Date
for
-
e
COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
440 COURT STREET
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE: (727) 464-3251
KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL - CHAIRMAN
SUSAN LATVALA - VICE CHAIRMAN
CALVIN D. HARRIS
JOHN MORRONI
ROBERT B. STEWART
BARBARA SHEEN TODD
KENNETH T. WELCH
Utilization Permit #03-0281 U
May 19, 2003
L1overas, Baur & Stevens
29228 US Highway 19 North
Clearwater, FI. 33761
Attn: Michiel S. L1overas, PE
Re: Utilization Permit for OEM Partnership - Belcher Road & Calumet Street. (01/29/15)
Dear Mr. L1overas:
We are enclosing your approved Utilization Permit covering the proposed construction
described below:
Construct a potable water connection on Belcher Road.
This letter must be attached to and made part of the approved Utilization Permit, making the
following conditions binding to the Permit:
1. IUs the responsibility of the engineer of record to procure all necessary permits that are
required by the agencies that are affected by the proposed construction.
2. Contact Pinellas County Highway Inspector Gene Crosson prior to beginning work.
(Ph. #464-8900,48 Hrs. Minimum Notice)
3. An eighteen (18) month maintenance bond may be required. The maintenance bond
must be a minimum of 20% of the completion bond with the owner/developer as
Principal.
Before this Permit becomes effective, it will be necessary to contact the Utility Notification
Center, "Call Sunshine", (1-800-432-4770) not less than 48 hours or more than five (5) days
prior to construction.
S. (~I '"'
In." ere y' . ;~.
..-..
Patrick S. Fox
Public Works Engineering Technician
Right-of-Way Utilization Permits
Permitting Services
/pf
Enclosure/cc: Highway Department
"Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" · Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace C.: printed on recycled paper
-
-
COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
440 COURT STREET
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
PHONE: (727) 464-3251
KAREN WILLIAMS SEEL - CHAIRMAN
SUSAN LATVALA - VICE CHAIRMAN
CALVIN D. HARRIS
JOHN MORRONI
ROBERT B. STEWART
BARBARA SHEEN TODD
KENNETH T. WELCH
Utilization Permit #03-0282 U
May 19, 2003
L1overas, Baur & Stevens
29228 US Highway 19 North
Clearwater, FI. 33761
Attn: Michiel S. L1overas, PE
Re: Utilization Permit for OEM Partnership - Belcher Road & Calumet Street. (01/29/15)
Dear Mr. L1overas:
We are enclosing your approved Utilization Permit covering the proposed construction
described below:
Construct a sanitary sewer connection on Belcher Road.
This letter must be attached to and made part of the approved Utilization Permit, making the
following conditions binding to the Permit:
1.
It is the responsibility of the engineer of record to procure all necessary permits that are
required by the agencies that are affected by the proposed construction.
2.
Contact Pinellas County Highway Inspector Gene Crosson prior to beginning work.
(Ph. #464-8900,48 Hrs. Minimum Notice)
3.
An eiahteen (18) month maintp.nance hand mrlV be reauired The maintp.nrlncP' hond
-- - -...;:." - - _0- - - - '\ . -., "" - - - - -- - - - - ____ - - - - - ___ - - - __ - . "__ _ _ _ _OJ ._ _ _ _ -. __.~ _ ___ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ . _". _ _ _ _ _. ._.
must be a minimum of 20% of the completion bond with the owner/developer as
Principal.
Before this Permit becomes effective, it will be necessary to contact the Utility Notification
Center, "Call Sunshine", (1-800-432-4770) not less than 48 hours or more than five (5) days
prior to construction.
Sincr\'~..eIY: ~~ V~
, >)
\. " ,
1\ '
Patrick S. Fox
Public Works Engineering Technician
Right-of-Way Utilization Permits
Permitting Services
/pf
Enclosure/cc: Highway Department
"Pinellas County is an Equal Opportunity Employer" · Member-Pinellas Partnership for a Drug Free Workplace CJ printed on recycled paper
-
-
1. Description and nature of the proposed installation shall be outlined in the two blank lines on application.
2. The bottom of Application Sheet 1 shall be signed by applicant or his agent.
3. On the attached plan, the following data shall be supplied:
a. The plan shall show the right of way lines and the widths of right of way. The offset distance from the centerline of the proposed
installation shall be shown and the scope of the proposed project, with all the distances and sizes clearly indicated.
b. Typical cross section shall be furnished showing width of pavement, Width of right of way on each side, offset distance from centerline
to proposed installation and any pertinent data to sidewalks, curbs and gutters, etc.
c. Indicate type of installation on both typical cross section and plan view.
d. All pertinent drainage information and calculations or justification for size of pipe and/or grading.
4. All improvements within County maintained right of way shall conform to Florida Department of Transportation requirements and/or Pinellas
County Subdivision requirements.
5. All applications for water and sewer lines must be separate applications and countersigned by the utility involved prior to submittal.
6. This form is to be made out in QUADRUPLICATE with four (4) drawings: one fully executed copy will be returned to you after approval.
7. There is a variable processing fee which must be received prior to the issuance of the permit. Please make check payable to Board of County
Comm:sslor1@fS.
8. Due to the extensive work being done in Pinellas County right of way, please provide proof that you meet the following insurance requirements:
"Comprehensive General liability Insurance including, but not limited to, Independent Contractor, Contractual, Premises/Operations,
Products/Completed Operation, Explosion, Coilapse and Underground, and Personal Injury covering the liability assumed under
indemnification provisions of this permit, with limits of liability for personal injury and/or bodily injury, including death, of not less than
$300,000, each occurrence; and property damage of not less than $100,000, each occurrence. (Combined Single limits of not less than
$300,000, each occurrence, will be acceptable unless otherwise stated.) Coverage shall be on an "occurrence" basis, and the policy shall
include Broad Form Property Damaqe coverage, and Fire Leqal Liability of not less than $50,000 per occurrence, unless otherwise stated
by exception herein." ,
THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER .CALL SUNSHINE" (1-8004324770) MUST BE NOTIFIED 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Plnellas County Public Works
Permitting Services Section
440 Court Street, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, Fl 33756
(727) 464-3670
UTIUTYCOUNTERSIGN l'<
UTlurl QWNER(S) IS TO BE
NOTIFIED A MINIMUM OF
4U HRS PRIOn TO CONNECTION
OF THEIR FACiliTIES,
~~fi~ '
('r '). J c' ^:f,'''-.1? r:'r
, (NamelTille) <- _I ~ () j
ae
TO BE FILLED OUT BY PINELLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Sod required
Open cut
es
DYes
Jack and bore DYes
Directional bore DYes
~'
9...bJ.o-.e
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORID
,-:-" llG'J,\,:::)_
Date:~
SEE ATTACHED LETTER FOR ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS TO THIS UTILITY PERMIT
Pi;,ellas County
Department of Public Works
e
RIGHT OF WAY
UTILIZATION PERMIT
Sewer
eERMIT NO. 09 _ '128:2. U I
L :)0 ) --0\
THE COUNTY OF PINELLAS, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter
called the Permitter, hereby grants to
Mark Klein
of DEM Partnership, a Florida general partnership
(SlreelAddress, City, Stale, Zip) sanitary sewer
renewD and/or removeD improvements with in
(Name)
hereinafter called the Permittee, a Permit to constructm, operateD, maintainD,
the right-of-way of Belcher Road.
and/or property of Permitter at the following location:
County Road No. 501 Name: Belch.er Road
situated at SW corner of Belcher Road and
(Address CY Slreet Intersedion)
on attached plan along, across, beneath, or CNer right of way
Section -L
Calumet' St.
Township ~South
Range ~ East,
, Florida, subject to the following provisions and conditions:
1. Construction, operation and maintenance of such utility shall not interfere with property and rights of prior occupant.
2. The construction, operation and maintenance of such utility shall not create obstruction or conditions which are or may become dangerous to
the traveling public.
3. All work must be done in keeping with standards of the Florida Department of Transportation Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design,
Construction aiid Maintenance for Streets and Highways, Roadway and Traffic Design Standards, Florida Department of Transportation Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, AASHTO and by the County Director or his agenl
4. All materials and equipment shall be subject to inspection by an Engineer of the County or his agent.
5. The Permittee shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, pay the cost of defense, and save harmless the Permitter from and against paymeGt
of ail claims, suits, actions, costs, attorneys' fees, expenses, damages, judgments, or decrees by reason of any person or persons or property
being damaged or injured by the permittee, his employees, agents or sub-contractors or in any way attributable to the performance, prosecution,
construction, operation, or maintenance of work herein permitted by Permitter and resulting from negligent acts or omissions of said Permittee
in connection with the work herein permitted.
6. The Permittee shall repair any damage or injury to the road or highway or other Ccunty property by reason of the exercise of any of the privileges
granted in this Permit, and shall repair the same promptly, within seven (7) days of opening, restoring it to a condition at least equal to that which
existed immediately prior to the infliction of such damage or injury. (Note: All portions of the right of way other than paved areas disturbed by
the construction of this utility will be compacted, grassed and mulched or sodded as required.)
7. All overhead installations Shall conform to clearance standards of the State Utilities Accommodation Guide and afl underground crossing
installations shaH be laid at a minimum depth of 36" below pavement, or at such greater depth as Permitter may require.
8. In the event of widening, repair or reconstruction of said road, the Permittee shall move or remove said utility installation at no cost to the
Perm:ttc,_
9.
This permit creates? permissive use only and the placing of facilities upon County property pursuant hereto shall not operate to create or to
vest any property rights in said Permitee and is granted in perpetuity subject to termination by the Permitter upon the givin9 of 30-days notice
in writing to the Permittee. 1-__
The pe..rmittee ;hall furnish the Permitter with a survey showing the exact locations of all facilities to bk jnstaIlecJp:fWE~tJtliiJ~. ermit, said
survey to be sufficiently detailed to allow location of said Installation by reference thereto. r r----.~~OUNTY
The attached plan, covering details of this instal/ation, shall be a part of this permit. I i ~
Upon completion Of installation, if fleid adjustments are made, an as-built drawing will have to be su1~itte1 FE B 1 1 I
Section corner monuments subject to displacement shall first be referenced and later reset by a F!Orra ~e~:d survi~).l !
All actIVIties In accordance WIth thiS permit WIll reqlJ!re conformance to the "Manual on Traffic Control aT a Sare t-'rac~~way
ConstrUction, Maintenance and Utility Operations." (Chapter 316 FlOrida Statutes) UTILlZA T10YI'p1.~~IT ~..
The Permittee's attention is directed to the provisions of the Trench Safety Act (Florida Statutes, Section 553.60 et. seq.) an e S
Safety and Health Administration S--::cavation Safety Staiida.ds (29 CF.R. Section 1926.650, Subpart P) which shall apply to construction,
operation, and maintenance pursuant to this permit.
Compaction within right of way to meet Pinellas County Minimum Standards.
Highway Department is to be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to beginning work at 464-8900, otherwise the Permit will be voided.
el/, c ies of all testing reports are to be forwarded to the Pinellas County Highway Deptartment
ithin 60 days from the date of this permit and it shall be completed within days
10.
11.
I
I
f
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Permittee or Agent: ,x...
Rev9J8/99 Mark S. Klein
Phone:
4Ld-1951
Date:
!-2C)-os
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
e
e
1 Description and nature of the proposed Installation shall be outlined in the two blank lines on application
2. The bottom or Application Sheet 1 shall be signed by applicant or his agent.
3. On the attached plan, the following data shall be supplied:
a. The plan shall show the right of way lines and the widths of right of way. The offset distance from the centerline of the proposed
installation shall be shown and the scope of the proposed project, with all the distances and sizes clearly indicated
b. Typical cross section shall be furnished showing width of pavement, width of right of way on each side, offset distance from centerline
to proposed installation and any pertinent data to sidewalks, curbs and gutters, etc.
c. Indicate type of installation on both typical cross section and plan view.
d. All pertinent drainage information and calculations or justification for size of pipe and/or grading.
4. All improvements within County maintained right of way shall conform to Florida Department of Transportation requirements and/or Pinellas
County Subdivision requirements.
5. All applications for water and sewer lines must be separate applications and countersigned by the utility involved prior to submittal.
6. This form is to be made out in QUADRUPLICATE with four (4) drawings; one fully executed copy will be returned to you after approval.
7. There is a variable processing fee which must be received prior to the issuance of the permit. Please make check payable to Board of County
Commissjonars,
8. Due to the extensive work being done in Pinellas County right of way, please provide proof that you meet the following insurance requirements:
"Comprehensive General Liability Insurance including, but not limited to, Independent Contractor, Contractual, Premises/Operations,
Products/Completed Operation, Explosion, Coiiapse and Underground, and Personal injury covering the liability assumed under
indemnification provisions of this permit, with limits of liability for personal injury and/or bodily injury, including death, of not less than
$300,000, each occurrence; and property damage of not less than $100,000, each occurrence. (Combined Single Limits of not less than
$300,000, each occurrence, will be acceptable unless otherwise stated.) Coverage shall be on an "occurrence" basis, and the policy shall
include Broad Form Property Damaqe coverage, and Fire Leqal Liability of not less than $50,000 per occurrence, unless otherwise stated
by exception herein."
THE UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 'CALL SUNSHINE" (1-800-432-4770) MUST BE NOTIFIED 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Pinellas County Public Works
Permitting Services Section
440 Court Street, 2nd Floor
Clearwater, FL 33756
(727) 464-3670
UT'U,;I OWNEl (8) IS TO BE
NOTIFIED IX rvllNIMUM OF
4:3 HRS PRIOn TO CONNECTION
OF T-;[IFt FAC>UTIES.
UTILITY COUNTERSIGN
~J~
<',. 'J:J ""11\, 9" "~r:':.c ~
(Name/tilfeJ< ,-I c.f'-o j
ae
: 't..
l \
"'; '\ TO BE FILLED OUT BY PINELLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
i
Sod required
Open cut
~..
DYes
Jack and bore 0 Yes
Directional bore 0 Yes
~.
o No
for Public
SEE A TI ACHED LETIER FOR ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS TO THIS UTILITY PERMIT.
An Equal
Opportunity
Employer
Ronnie E. Duncan
Chair, Pinellas
Thomas G. Dabney, II
Vice Chair, Sarasota
Heidi B. McCree
Secretary, Hillsborough
Watson L Haynes, II
Treasurer, Pinellas
Edward W. Chance
Manatee
Monroe "AI" Coogler
Citrus
Maggie N. Dominguez
Hillsborough
Pamela L. Fentress
Highlands
Ronald C. Johnson
Polk
JanQt D. Kovach
Hillsborough
Gene A. Heath
Interim Executive Director
William s. Bilenky
General Counsel
Protecting Your
Water Resources
South~st Florida
Water Managelnent District
e
2379 Broad StreloC, Rrooksville, Florida 34604-6899
(352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only)
SUNCOM 628-4150 TOD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only)
On the Internet at: WaterMatters.org
Tampa Service Office
7601 Highway 301 North
Tampa, Florida 33637-6759
(813) 985-7481 or
1-800-83&0797 (Fl only)
SUNCOM 578-2070
Bartow Service Office
170 Century Boulevard
Bartow, Florida 338;30-7700
(863) 534-1448 or
1-800-492-7862 (Fl only)
SUNCOM 572-6200
Sarasota Service Office
6750 Fruitville Road
Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711
(941) 377-3722 or
1-800-320-3503 (FL only)
SUNCOM 531-6900
Lecanto Service Office
3600 West Sovereign Path
Suite 226
Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070
(352) 527-8131
SUNCOM 667-3271
February 24, 20@1-
RECEIVED
Mark S. Klein
DEM Partnership, a Florida General Partnership
2040 Northeast Coachman Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
FEB 2 5 2003
LLOVERAS, BAUR & STEVENS
Subject:
Notice of Final Agency Action for Approval
ERP General Construction
Permit No: 44024317,000
Project Name: DEM Partnership - Belcher Road and Calumet Street
County: Pinellas
Secffwp/Rge: 1/29S/15E
Dear Mr. Klein:
This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action for approval of the permit application
referenced above. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being
received by the District within the time frames described below.
You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding
a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and
120.57, F.S., and Chapter 28-1 06, Florida Administrative Gode (FAG.), of the Uniform Rules
of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each
person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2)
state--aJl-mateFial-faGfsueisplJtefi--iJythe-per-S0RFefjldest-iRfftheheaFiRg_ or -state lhal tR€Fe--ar-e .
no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-1 06, F.A. C. Copies of Sections
28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAG. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing
must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville
address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the
date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for
hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may
have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to
Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative aispute regarding the District's action in this
matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing.
Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule
40D-1.1 01 0, F.AC., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests
may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how
to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use.
The enclosed approved construction plans are part of the permit, and construction must be
in accordance with these plans.
-
DEM Partnership, a Florida General Partnership
Page 2
February 24, 2003
e
If you have questions concerning the permit, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E., at the Tampa Service
Office, extension 2045. For assistance with environmental concerns, please contact Rick A. Perry, P.W .S.,
extension 2056.
Sincerely,
/J/1/J ~/~L f
UZfi-.~F/~
Alba E. Mas, P.E., Director
Tampa Regulation Department
AEM:elb
Enclosures:
Approved Permit w/Conditions Attached
Approved Construction Drawings
Statement of Completion
Notice of Authorization to Commence Construction
_.Noticing2~keL(42.DO~Q3.9l_._,____. .. ___' .....
Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAC.
File of Record 44024317.000
S. "Sandy" L1overas, L1overas, Baur and Stevens
celene:
-l"
-
.
SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NO. 44024317.000
I EXPIRATION DATE: February 24, 2008
I PERMIT ISSUE DATE: February 24,2003
This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and the Rules contained
in Chapters 400-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code (FAC.). 400-40, authorizes the Permittee to
perform the work outlined herein and outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawing(s),
plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water
Management District (District). All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water
management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and
Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit.
PROJECT NAME:
OEM Partnership - Belcher Road and Calumet Street
GRANTED TO:
OEM Partnership, a Florida General Partnership
2040 Northeast Coachman Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
ABSTRACT: This permit is for the construction of a commercial site, the associated infrastructure, and an
effluent filtration pond.
OP. & MAINT. ENTITY:
OEM Partnership, a Florida General Partnership
PROPERTY LOCATION:
Pinellas County
SECnwP/RGE:
1/29S/15E
TOTAL ACRES OWNED
-OR-UNOeR-CQN~ROb~
a,2-g
PROJECT SIZE:
3.29 Acres
LAND USE:
Commercial
DATE APPLICATION FILED:
October 15, 2002
AMENDED DATE:
N/A
-
.
Permit No.
Project Name:
Page
44024317.000
DEM Partnership - Belcher Road and Calumet Street
2
I. Water Quantity/Quality
AREA
ACRESAt...
...TOeOF
BANK
Eff!uent Filtration
1
O.?6
TOTAL
0.26
Mixing Zone required: YES ( )
NO (X)
NO (X)
Variance required: YES ( )
II. 1 OO-Year Floodplain
-Eilcroacnmenl - n-COmpensatron CompensalTOn Encroachmel11 - r
(Acre-Feet of fill) (Acre-Feet of excavation) Type Result (feet)
0.00 0.00 N/A N/A
III. Environmental Considerations
No wetlands or other surface waters exist within the project area.
A regulatory conservation easement is not required.
A proprietary conservation easement is not required.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other
than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate,
pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, FAC. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit
(which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall
not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums.
2. The discharges from this system shall meet state water quality standards as set forth in Chapter
62-302 and Section 62-4.242, FAC., for class waters equivalent to the receiving waters.
3. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all information and reports required by this permit
shall be submitted to:
Tampa Regulation Department
Southwest Florida Water Management District
7601 U.S. Highway 301 North
Tampa, FL 33637
The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information
submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted.
e
.
Permit No.
Project Name:
Page
44024317.000
OEM Partnership - Belcher Road and Calumet Street
3
4. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida,
to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements
of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone
number of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to
construction.
5. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit
to the Tampa Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered
professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required
Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter
400-1, FAC., and signed, dated, and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify
any deviations from the approved construction drawings.
6. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to
assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee
may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives,
by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other
assistance measures as needed on site.
7. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the
District, in accordance with the following schedule.
For systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration or systems utilizing effluent filtration or
exfiltration and retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed 18 months after
operation is authorized and every 18 months thereafter.
8. For dry bottom detention systems, the detention areas shall become dry within 36 hours after a
rainfall event. If a detention area is regularly wet, this situation shall be deemed to be a violation
of this permit.
9. Referto GENERAL CONDITION No. 15 herein.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by
reference and the Permittee shall comply with them.
~~
/i.llthnri7arl Qinn~::t1t11 ra
I \.'-"LII'-'.''-:''''-'_ '-'1~IU.A."""J""'"
~..'
..
e
Exhibit A
A part of Lot 12, CLEARWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the
plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 44, Page 46, Public Records
of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as
follows:
Commence at the Northwest corner of said Lot 12; thence South
89 degrees 21'49" East (plat bearing and basis of bearings for
this description), along the North boundary of said Lot 12,
208.00 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence" South 89 degrees
21'49" East, continuing along the North boundary of said Lot 12,
377.16 feet; thence South 00 degrees 02'48" West, along the West
right-of-way line of Belcher Road, 55.00 feet Westerly of and
parallel to the East boundary of the Southeast one-quarter (1/4)
of Section I, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County,
Florida, being the West boundary of public right-of-way conveyed
to Pinellas County by Quit-Claim Deed recorded November 17, 1976
in O.R. Book 4478, Page 2113, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida, 379.98 feet; thence North 89 degrees 21'49" West, along
the South boundary of said Lot 12, 376.66 feet to a point lying
South 89 degrees 21'49" East of and 200.00 feet from the
Southwest corner of said Lot 12; thence North 00 degrees 01'4211
West, 379.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH an easement for drainage purposes, as created in
an instrument recorded February 23, 1993, in Official Records
Book 8188, page 825, described as follows:
A part of Lot 12, CLEARWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the
plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 44, page 46, of the Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described
as follows: Begin at the Southwest corner of said Lot 12;
thence North 00 deg. 05'30" West (plat bearing and basis of
bearings for this description) along the West boundary of said
Lot 12, 10.00 feet; thence South 89 deg. 21'49" East, 200.01 ~
feet; thence South 00 deg. 01'42" East, 10.00 feet; thence North
89 deg. 21'49" West, along the South boundary of said Lot 12,
200.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
National Society
of
Professional Engineers
Florida Engineering
Society
American Society
of
Civil Engineers
Florida Surveying
and
Mapping Sociefy
American Congress
on
Surveying and Mapping
Insfitute
of
Transportation Engineers
Florida Planning
and
Zoning Association
National Association
of
Environmental Professionals
-
.
(;Jw.JJt- cmJ. Q~
,
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
September 24, 2003
Mr. Mark S. Klein
Klein & Heuchan, Inc. Realtors
2040 N.E. Coachman Road
Clearwater, Florida 33765
Re:
DEM Partnership - Belcher Road & Calumet Street
GTE Federal Credit Union
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application
Dear Mark:
Enclosed please find the following information for your use in making the City of Clearwater
application for the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment associated with the GTE Federal
Credit Union.
1. Fifteen (15) copies of the City of Clearwater Flexible Development Application for
this Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project.
2. One (1) copy of a location map.
3. One (1) reduced set of the Site Plans, including the Landscape Plan.
4. One (1) reduced set of the credit union elevations.
5. One (1) copy of the Southwest Florida Water Management District Environmental
Resource Pennit.
6. One (1) set ofthe Pinellas County Use Permits.
7. Fifteen (15) prints (24" x 36") of the Boundary Survey.
8. Fifteen (15) sets (24' x 36" - 2 sheets) of the building elevations.
9. Fifteen (15) sets (24" x 36' - 11 sheets) of the Site Construction Plans.
Thirteen (13) copies of the application and the drawings are needed for submittal. Two (2)
extra copies are enclosed for your use.
Please let us know if you have any questions or if you need any assistance with the submittal
of this application.
Very truly yours,
AND STEVENS
overas, PE, PSM, AICP
illS!: Iw/klein2
enclosures
29228 U.S. Hwy. 19 North
Clearwater, Florida 33761
www.lbsonline.com
Pinellas: (727) 784-3965
Pasco: (727) 842-7635
Fax: (727) 784-8153
CL WCoverSheet
-
e
, f"""'"", ,:, "-"~',~':;:', ,"', '/ ["':l ,,:c:.,
, "" "', ,'i, \ Ii, L, I'~'
} ~, '; " : '" \ 1 ',1!" ..L}.:~.,,,,., "j \ I,: ["
j" I
~' ,'I
ijl,) , \ :J
,-:., . '.', :',,7'\-;':::';"~:'--,~ -'_.(",;-:~'~-,',:-:"'J;'::';f'::;:'_::'-;,=~;'::;'r'"r, , ,;.-) .
f t_', .",1 ,",',,~ '~.,... ...)0: ,".1 ':_, _ > 1~" "<.::::,":"': ~:;:_,',': :, ~_' . V~
_:AIY 0": (;I!:.i,c,>I;\1 L;1,
FLD2003-09047
1750 N BELCHER RD
Date Received: 09/24/2003
GTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
ZONING DISTRICT: IRT
LAND USE: IL
ATLAS PAGE: 262B
Oil l G. , Nil-\.. ~E.T
\ t~'V~) \ I
c~ \~\;, ~:j~f
-
.
rlDVrWZ2Z;c.:>-/O:-
,~1~~-)
,(~:'\. (';;;)\~
<icY, t,.""",\, 1""
fy,ff;;::lj
(;. (~~~" \, \ I
(1'- - - F\
''1'''''' = I'
'i~II~' =- u
\,\\f'~ ~ - :I
""~?,.,A~~..,
"".,. "",J11" """~""'" \,",' A',
-\..""~ ~J.",~~7::,;;:il1f~lL,~<".J,i.'f
~i.j~"IFI:r' ", ~~)
-, ~i!:;,.\ i:J /J tG ~ "t., .rj~ Y}C
.-<:~,;c~ZV1.i1.1t
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
PIANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUiLDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 18, 2003
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
2435 U.S. Highway 19, Suite 350
Holiday, FL 34691
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-09047 - 1750 North Belcher Road
Dear Mr. Figurski:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On December 16,2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to
allow direct access to a major arterial street (North Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted
use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial
area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
1304.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the
following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1304.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to
development/redevelopment efforts of the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union with hours of
operation ending at 5 :00 pm daily. The applicant shall record a covenant in the public
records restricting the use of this building on the subject property, as contained in this
condition, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union. Any future
change of use of this building to a bank: shall require the following:
BRIAN j. AUNGST, MAYOR-COM~IISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER \VHITNEY GRW, CmlMISSIONER
FRANK HII3BARD, COMMISSIONER * BIl,l.jONSON, Cml~IISSI0NER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRIvL'lTIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
It
e
December 18, 2003
Figurski - Page Two
a. Construction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left
turn lane of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida Department of
Transportation design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road.
Construction of this improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank, for the future construction of a traffic signal
light at the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted
by a Traffic Signal Wan-ant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a
shared pOliion of the full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion
shall not exceed 50 percent of the full cost. If, in the event that a traffic signal
light is not wan-anted based on the Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant.
3. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building
pennits for the proposed credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
4. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding
of the lighting by tree canopy; and
5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common
theme including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity. Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet
in height. Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is required for more than one
freestanding sign on either street frontage.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (December 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time
after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit
application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building pennits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when
applying for any pelmits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an applicationJnotice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on January 1, 2004 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
e
e
December 18, 2003
Figurski - Page Three
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.mycIearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
\IMS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLLY\Pending cases I Up for the next CDBlBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (IRT) (CIRP-
retail sales)IBelcher N 1750 Development Order. doc
tit
--
~ Clearwater
u
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue, 33756
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwate~ Florida 33758-4748
Fax
To:
Mr. Gerald Figurski
From: Wayne Wells 562-4504
Fax: 944-3711
Pages: 8
Re:
Staff Recommendation
Date: 12/12/2003
CC:
Phone: 942-0733
o Urgent
1KI For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
. Comments:
Attached staff recommendation re: FLD2003-09047 - 1750 North Belcher Road
(BelCal Properties, LLC.)
Community Development Board Meeting date: Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 2:00pm
r
I
I
DATE,TIME
FA>< tm. /HAf'lE
DURATIOH
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
'.At'SMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
12/12 15:31
9'3443711
00:04:25
08
m<
STANDARD
EeM
TIME 12/12/2003 15:35
HAME PLAH
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
I
I
I
~
-
Engineers ~ Surveyors ~ Planners
Lloveras, Baur and Stevens
29228 U.S. Highway 19 North Phone: (727) 784-3965
Clearwater, Florida 33761 Fax: (727) 784-8153
To: Wayne M. Wells, AICP
From: Michael S. Lloveras, PE, PSM, AICP
CC:
Date: December 72, 2003
Re: Bel-Cal
Wayne,
Here are the reductions that you requested.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Mike
LL e
0
>-
f--
U
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: jO-r- r v. ~"'j vr:\')::,
FAX: .. .'14+\ 3711.
Phone: '} + 2- - 0 73'3
FROM:\-) (N.-\ '0J.- W ~\ \:s
DATE:c_ E-)4\~ 3
Phone: ~ ~ L' +S04-
RE: PL-P 'U)O ~ * CJ ~ 0+ 7
11 SO N. D~ \c~v- IC~.
MESSAGE:
~Pl ~J..~~, ;" ')htLJ~,.t.
S~ e ~ plLt.-fl2.lt) f:} L + #.3 .
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) L
DATE,TIME
FAX HO./HAME
DURATIOH
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
*RAHSMISSIOH \/ERIFICATIOH REPORT
I
12,/04 12: 34
'3'3443711
OD: 00: 5E:
02
i]f<
5T A~mARD
ECM
TIME 12/04/2003 12:35
HAME PLAr~
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
e
e
DRAFT
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to development/redevelopment efforts of the
surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as
modified by, the CDB;
(:!) That, prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed credit union, revised plans be submitted and
approved showing the construction a left turn lane of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida
Department of Transportation design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road;
o That, prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed credit union, the applicant establish an escrow
V account with the City for the future construction of a traffic signal light at the intersection of North Belcher Road
and Calumet Street, if warranted by a Traffic Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a
shared portion of the full cost of a traffic signal light. If, in the event that a traffic signal light is not warranted
based on the Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant;
4. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building pemrits for the proposed
credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
5. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding of the lighting by tree
canopy; and
6. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme including similar
style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of unifomrity. Freestanding signage shall be
limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in height. Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is
required for more than one freestanding sign on either street frontage.
DRAFT
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartlllentlC D BIFLEX1Pending caseslUp for the next CDBIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (IRT) (CIRP-
retail sales)IBelcher N 1750 Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 5
-
e
C I T Y 0 F
CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 1, 2003
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
2435 US Highway 19, Suite 350
Holiday, FL 34691
Re: Community Development Board Meeting (FLD2003-09047)
Dear Mr. Figurski:
The Flexible Development application (Case No. FLD2003-09047) to permit retail sales
(financial services) with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher
Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the
use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C for property located at 1750 North Belcher
Road has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on December
16,2003.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
WarN- M . W~
Wayhe M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
\\MS5cIPDSIPlanl1ing DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next CDB\Belcher IV 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (IRT) (retail
sales)IBelcher IV 1750 CDB Letter.doc
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYO)(-CmL\115SI0NER
HoYr HAAilLTON, VICE IYlAYOR-CmIMISSIONER \VHITNEY GRAY, CmI:\1[5510NER
FRANK HlI3lJARD, COM!v!lS5[ONER ('~ B[LL)01\5C1:'<, Cml\[[5510NE[{
~y
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E',IPI.O\1')("
GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A.
J. BEN HARRILL, P.A.
SHELLY MAY JOHNSON
LAURALEE G. WESTINE
.GURSKI & HARRIL~
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
THE HOLIDAY TOWER
2435 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 SUITE 350
HOLIDAY, FLORIDA 34691
www.fhlaw.net
TELEPHONE: (727) 942-0733
FAX: (727) 944-3711
EMAIL: law@fhlaw.net
November 20, 2003
HAND DELIVERED
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
RE: BELCAL PROPERTIES, LLC
Case No. FLD2003-09047, 1750 North Belcher Road
Dear Wayne:
Enclosed please find fifteen (15) copies of the revised narrative. Should you have
any questions or comments regarding the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
~:9.Pl~1\~~ii~~~tiJt(L '
ErIi i 1/
i! '/
V
/mjp
Enclosures
cc: Belcal Properties, LLC
Michael S. Lloveras, PE, PSM, AICP
8 e
KLEIN &HEUCHAN,INt!
~~ment/Real Estate Services
--
A. D. Booth, Jr.
Thomas A. Duncan, Sr.
Aaron Fisch
Linda Gardiner
Lawrence D. Gilbert
Mark S. Klein, CClM
Steven G. Klein
M. F. "Bud" Lytle
Stanley Newmark
Joseph T. Santolucito
John l. Shannon
Harvey Simon
Martin A. Slavney
November 14,2003
Mr. Wayne Wells
Municipal Service Building
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Via: Hand Delivery
RE: Belcal Properties LLC
Dear Wayne:
Thank you for your help in bringing to my attention the fact that we had not provided needed
infonnation to you in our last packet.
Enclosed are the following:
Fifteen (15) sets of elevation drawings of the distribution
building currently under construction. This elevation called for
metal sidewalls with an option for block & stucco, the eastern &
northem faces will be block & stucco, color chips will follow.
Fifteen (15) sets of the elevation of the proposed Credit Union
Building. Color rendering shall follow.
Fifteen (15) sets of the elevation of the proposed office building,
and an 8 'is x 11 color rendering of the proposed building. Please
understand that fmal colors have not been selected at this time,
however the color rendering is close.
,...,
Mark S. Klein
General Partner
Cc: Michael Lloveras
Gerald Figmski, Esquire
[0]1]
2040 I\jE Coachman I\oad, CleorwOier, Florida 33765
Phone 727/441- '1951 . Fax 727/4,,:[.9-1724 . 'vV\il/WI~leinandheuchan.com
[B
REALTOrt
INDIVIDUAL
MEMBERSHIP
LL
.
>-
o
FROM: \~~-W\~
DATE:~ ~) I +1 ~ ~
MESSAGE:
RE: \ 7 SU N.. )!).e\~hu )C ~.
PL.-V 2..<>\)~ - 0 '} cA 7
o \'-~)\~\ ~ \'L ~\\~cl
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) .3
DATE,TIME
F A>< HI]. / flAME
DURATIOH
F'AGE (S)
RESULT
HODE
~RAHSMISSION VERIFICATIOH REPOR~
.L __.J
11,/14 19: 15
99443711
00:01:49
03
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TIHE 11/14/2003 19:18
HAME PLi~N
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275624557
GrATE. TIME
FA>< HD. /tiAHE
DURATION
L PAGE(S)
RESULT
MDDE
eRAtiSMISSICIH \lERIFICATIOH REPOR.
L r
11/14 1'3: 1. 9
'34491724
00:01:48
03
OV
~;T At',jDARD
ECM
TIME 11/14/2003 19:21
NAME PLAH
FAX 7275624575
TEL 7275524557
,
I
I
I
I
I
.----1
.RAHSHISSIOH \lER~FIC:A~IiJH REPOR.
L- J
DATE. TIME
FAX t:~O. / t~Ar\1E
DURA TI OH
PAC:iE (:=;)
RESULT
1"10DE
11/14 19:22
'37848153
00:01:48
03
or:
~=;T A~mARD
EeM
TIME 11/14/2003 19:23
r1AME PLAH
FAX 7275524576
TEL 7275624567
I
I
I
-
e
C I T Y 0 F
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRUE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
November 14, 2003
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
2435 US Highway 19, Suite 350
Holiday, FL 34691
Re: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations
to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a
permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons
beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-1304.C (Case No. FLD2003-09047, 1750 North Belcher Road).
Dear Mr. Figurski:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval and, while
deemed complete and sufficient for advertising purposes, there are still some changes to the
plans and application requiring revision:
1. The applicant must provide a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development. The
expected trip volumes from the proposed site exceed the City's threshold of 100 vph or
1,000 vpd. Prior to conducting a TIA make an appointment for a scoping meeting with
Traffic Operations Division (727) 562-4778. NOTE: We understand that the TIA has
been ordered. Please provide as soon as possible.
2. Revise the responses to the General Applicability and the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project criteria, submitted as an attachment, to provide broader and/or
more specific statements that explain how, what, when and where the proposal of "retail
sales (financial services)" meets the criteria, including the deviations listed above at the
start of the letter. Do not repeat back the criteria as the response.
3. Unclear of the paved area at the northeast side ofthe proposed credit union (not shown to
be striped for parking). If it will be parking, show it as parking. Advise/revise.
4. The interior landscape area provided on Sheet 7 of 11 in the Vehicular Use Are
Tabulation indicates a total vehicular use area of 70,449 square feet, which is different
than that indicated on Sheet 1 of 11 in the Tabulation of Notes (72,680 square feet
shown). Revise Sheet 7 of 11.
5. Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required
screening. If located on the roof, note such.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAJvlILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HI13BARD, COMMISSIONER * BILLJONSON, CmlMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIR1\L\.TIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
-
e
November 14, 2003
Figurski - Page 2
6. Regarding outdoor lighting, a note has been added to indicate that Florida Power
Corporation will provide the light fixtures and that they will comply with Code
provisions. When asked to address the location of outdoor lighting fixtures, this was to
review in light of proposed site design and landscaping so as to minimize or eliminate
conflicts with other proposed improvements (such as trees, parking spaces, etc.). If not
indicated on these plans for this request, it will be necessary to show such on site plans
prior to issuance of building permits to determine any conflicts.
7. Our prior comment was "Provide sign package. Show location of proposed freestanding
sigJ,lage, including proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height,
area and color of proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage. Signs must
be architecturally coordinated in terms of design, color and style with the proposed
buildings." Your response was that signage will be handled separately. Any approval of
this request will include a condition relating to signage, restricting the number and height
of freestanding signage for this property, which may also require processing of a
Comprehensive SigJ,l Program.
8. For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), you have indicated that
you will provide rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one
copy). You do not need to mount them (will not fit into our files and is difficult to
microfilm later).
9. Provide color samples (paint samples, etc.) ofthe proposed exterior building materials.
10. Our prior comment required foundation landscaping, in accordance with Section 3-
l202.E.2. On the north side of the credit union, the site plan was revised to indicate a
sidewalk nine feet wide with only a four-foot foundation planting area. This does not
comply with the Code provision. Based on a phone conversation with Mark Klein today,
the site plan will be revised to show a four-foot wide sidewalk and a five-foot wide
foundation landscape area. Revise all appropriate plans.
11. Plant sizes must be per Code Section 3-1202.B. Revise Sheet 7 of 11 to show them in the
plant schedule, including the height at planting and spacing for each plant in a tabular
format for clarification.
Please provide 15 copies of the revised narrative (see #2 above) and 15 copies of revised
site/landscape plans (not necessarily all sheets) bv 4 pm on Thursday, November 20, 2003.
Note: Only two copies of the TIA is necessary to be submitted.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
*Make us your favorite!
Sincerely,
~~fa1 rU.. ('1. W~
W ayn~ M. Wells, AICP
Senior Plmmer
\ IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D B\FLEXlPending caseslUp for the next CDBIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (IRT)\Belcher N
1750 Revisions Letter 11.14.03.doc
e
GRAtlA~ DESIGN
l'
TO:
Mark I<J.ein
COMPANY:
Bel Cal Properties LLC
ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
RE:
Klein Office Building
o Via Regular Maii
o Via Hand Delivery
ARCHITECTS
o MEMORANDUM
o Via Overnight Express
X Via Pickup
.
ASS<9CIA TES~
PLANNERS
X TRANSMITTAL
FROM:
Jim Graham
DATE:
11-13-03
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES iNCLUDING COVER:
1 coyer, 15 copies Exterior Eleyations
FAX NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
03-22
o Via Facsimile
o Via Courier
P. A.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------~---------------------------------------------------------
WE ARE SENDING:
o Shop Drawings
o Samples
SUBMITTED FOR:
o Approval
ITEM NO.
1
COPIES
15
ACTION TAKEN:
o Approved As Submitted
o Rejected
o Application For Payment
o Specifications
o Review/Comment
DATE
11-13-03
o Change Order
o Other
X Sketch/Drawing
X As Requested
X For Your Use
DESCRIPTION
Exterior Elevations
----------- ---- --- ---------------- -..---- --------._----
o Make Corrections Noted
o Submit Specified Item
o Revise/Resubmit
REMARKS:
......................--..---......-..--....................---...............................-......--..--....................--......---....--..............................----.....................--.....-..-......-....-..-----....-....---..--
28100 U.s. HIGHWAY 19 N., SUITE 507
CLEARWATER, FL 33761
PHONE: 727/791-3320
National Society
of
Professional Engineers
Florida Engineering
Society
American Society
of
Civil Engineers
Florida Surveying
and
Mapping Society
American Congress
on
Surveying and Mapping
Institute
of
Transportation Engineers
Florida Planning
and
Zoning Association
National Association
of
Environmental Professionals
,
e
()aWt-~ Q~
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
November 5, 2003
Mr. Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Clearwater Planning Department
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle A venue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: DEM Partnership - Belcher Road and Calumet Street
BelCal Properties, LLC
Flexible Development Application
Case FLD2003-09047
1750 North Belcher Road
Dear Mr. Wells:
In reference to the October 30, 2003 DRC meeting, enclosed please fmd fifteen (15) copies of
the information listed below regarding the captioned project.
1. Revised Flexible Development Application form that has been modified as you requested.
2. Revised Site Construction Plans.
The colored and mounted copies of the requested plans will be provided to you prior to the
CDB hearing on December 16th.
We appreciate your continued efforts in the processing of this Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment application. Please let us know if you have any further questions or if you need
any additional information. '
Very tTuly yours,
enclosures
cc: Mark Klein w/enclosures
Jerry Figurski, Esquire w/enclosures
29228 U.S. Hwy. 19 North
Clearwater, Florida 33761
www.lbsonline.com
Pinellas: (727) 784-3965
Pasco: (727) 842-7635
Fax: (727) 784-8153
LL
.
o
>-
f-
()
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: ~ \ Q..I' \"" '"'\ B :)'..l"-~\:' / tv! IV"\:- )( \ ~'1""
FAX: '.~ +~ ~ 3"l \ I / 4-+-~ - \ 7 L+
./
'1~2-- 0;33 / H\- \<1~\
I
FROM: \~ 0. .u'v-L~ we \ \S Phone: -S \:, 1.. -----=---- 4-'s C)4
. )
DATE:~ -1V~03> RE:YL-P 2..003" o9o+?
17 S\) N. () e( Ch..v- rz-~.
MESSAGE: G~\ PJ~L ~~t-~
Phone:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 4-
.A~~SMISSliJH \/EF:IFICATlm~
I
FEPiJRT .
1-
Tn1E
HAt',1E
Fi',';..'
H,....
TEL
10!31/200~: 15:13
PLAH
7275e,24575
7275524557
DATE,TIME
F A>< ~~:]. / HAME
DURATlm~
PA(iE (S)
RESULT
MiJDE
10/31 15: 11
'j944:::711
00:02:15
04
m<
:3T A~mAF:D
EeM
DATE,TIME
F A>< tJIJ. / [.lAME
DURATIiJH
PAI3E(S)
RESULT
MCIDE
REPORT--.
1-
.AH91ISSIOt'1 \,JERIFICATION
TIME 10/31/2003 15:05
[JAr,'lE PLA~~
FAX 7275624575
TEL 7275624557
1[1/31 15: f:J3
'j4491724
00: 02: 1:::
04
[If<
:3T At'-lDAf"D
ECM
-
e
11 :30 a.m.
Case: FLD2003-09047 - 1750 North Belcher Road
Owner/Applicant: BelCal Properties, LLe.
Representative: Mr. Mark Klein (2040 NE Coachman Road, Clearwater, FL 33765; phone: 727-441-
1951; fax: 727-449-1724; email: mske@tampabav.rr.com).
Location: 3.288 acres located at the southwest comer of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street.
Atlas Page: 262B.
Zoning: IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow
direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate,
primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.e.
Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (GTE Federal Credit Union).
Neighborhood Association: None.
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Plall11er.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Beny, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson, Tom Glenn, Don Melone and
Scott Rice.
Applicant/Representative: Jell; Figurski, Mark Klein, Steve Klein
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) An Open Space dedication assessment is required only if the bldg coverage expansion is 50%
or more. Based on the site plan, the fee does not apply since the existing building coverage is
25,415 s.f. and only increasing to 26,228 s.f.
2. Stormwater:
a) In reference to BCP2003-03528, reminder that the sub drains must discharge directly to outfall
control structure. Plans submitted for this case indicate a subdrain flow to the pond; this
would result in a constant "wet" pond condition.
3. Traffic Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) Traffic Impact Fee calculations incorrect on site plan. Traffic Impact Fee of the amount of
$14,661.08 must be paid prior to e.O. (TIF reflect current rates as adopted by Pinellas
County.)
b) Create handicapped accessible path from office building to public sidewalk along Belcher
Road per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). Also an
accessible route to and from on site buildings.
c) Show vehicle-stacking drive through lanes for barue Since site plan shows 5 drive tluough
lanes please show these lanes to accommodate a total of 22 cars. Vehicles must not block
parking spaces or drive aisles. (City Community Development Code, Section 3-1404 3.B)
d) The applicant must provide a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development. The
expected trip volumes from the proposed site exceed the City's threshold of 100 vph or 1,000
vpd. Prior to conducting a TIA make an appointment for a scoping meeting with Traffic
Operations Division (727) 562-4778.
e) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
4. General Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) The Proposed 8" sanitary sewer main that serves the distribution center needs to be a
minimum of 5 ft. from any structure.
b) Separation from the 1" water service line and the 8" sanitary sewer main can be less than 1 0
ft.
c) Since the sidewalk along Belcher Road is being constructed on the proposed site and not
within the public right-of-way, an easement for such will be required.
d) All of the above required prior to CDB.
5. Planninl!::
a) Revise the "applicant's name" on the application to "BelCal Properties, LLe." Show "BelCal
Propeliies, LLC" as the property owner.
b) Based on the building dimensions indicated on Sheet 2 of 11 for the St. Pete Times
Distribution Building (also addressed at 1750 North Belcher Road) and under BCP2003-
03528, the distribution building should be 14,346 square feet, not 14,215 square feet.
Revise/advise.
Page 1 of 3
c) Revise. 1 of 11, based on the distribution building .1g either 14,346 square feet or
14,215 square feet (see Comment 2 above), under "Zoning Compliance Notes" and "Impact
Fee Calculations" the distribution building from 16,700 square feet.
d) Revise Sheet 1 of 11 to indicate the parking requirement for the credit union at five spaces per
1,000 square feet (not three spaces per 1,000 square feet).
e) Revise Sheet 3 of 11 to indicate that existing driveways on Calumet Street no longer to be
used will be removed, similar to those on Belcher Road (saw-cut & remove existing
driveway).
f) Complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, since BelCal Properties, LLC is the owner.
g) Revise the responses to the General Applicability and the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project criteria to provide statements that explain how, what, when and where
the proposal of "retail sales (financial services)" meets the criteria, including the deviations
listed above at the start of the letter. Do not repeat back the criteria as the response. In
General Applicability criteria #2, please provide the anticipated improvement value of the
proposed credit union (may also include the anticipated improvement value of all site
improvements for the three buildings). Suggestion is to provide such responses as an
attachment to the application, allowing for full discussion of your responses to the criteria.
h) Provide the width of all landscape islands.
i) Unclear of the paved area at the northeast side of the proposed credit union (not shown to be
striped for parking). Also unclear the need for the small landscape island to the west of this
paved area. Advise/revise.
j) The note "car stop (typical)" with its arrow line at the northeast corner of the proposed credit
union is unclear what it is pointing to (Sheet 2 of 11). Advise/revise.
k) Unclear of the need for sidewalks greater than five feet on the north side of the proposed
credit union and on the east and west sides of the proposed office building. Also unclear as to
the need to concrete the north side of the proposed office building. Advise/revise.
1) All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-
site.
m) The interior landscape area provided on Sheet 7 of 11 in the Vehicular Use Are Tabulation is
different than that indicated in the vehicular use area diagram at the top of the page.
n) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required
screening. If located on the roof, note such.
0) Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
p) Provide sign package. Show location of proposed freestanding signage, including proposed
setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of proposed signage.
Include any proposed attached signage. Signs must be architecturally coordinated in terms of
design, color and style with the proposed buildings.
q) Provide the proposed building heights in terms of feet, in accordance with Code provisions
(see defmition of "height, building or structure" for measurement of height).
r) For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), please provide rendered
(colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy).
s) Provide color samples (paint samples, etc.) of the proposed exterior building materials.
t) Since this overall site has three proposed buildings, please provide building elevations of the
other two proposed buildings (St. Pete Times distribution building and the office building).
Include proposed exterior building materials and colors.
u) Since a criteria for retail sales and services in the IRT District is that it take no access to a
major arterial street (Belcher Road), is it possible to remove the proposed driveway from
Belcher Road? Advise.
v) Since all existing structures are being removed as part of the redevelopment ofthis site and to
avoid confusion, remove from Sheet 2/11 the existing (ghosted) structures and pavement.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Inadequate solid waste service. Reconm1end at least two dumpster enclosures. Suggest
providing a recycling dumpster for St. Pete Times building.
7. Land Resources:
a) No conm1ents.
8. Fire:
a) Revise landscape islands to ensure proper turning radii for fire trucks and delivery trucks to
access entire site.
9. Environmental:
a) No comment.
10. Communitv Response:
a) No comment.
11. Landscapinl!:
Page 2 of 3
Per Sect_-1202.E.l table indicates that there must be .m back of curb to back of curb
on interior islands.
b) There is an existing plan for the site which will need to be revised to show the changes in
parking / drive-thru layout and associated landscape changes.
Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade
with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and
egress, within a minimum five foot \vide landscaped area composed of at least two accent
trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one
shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area
shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover.
d) Plant sizes must be per Code Section 3-1202.B.
a)
c)
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments'
comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon.
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEXlPending caseslUp for the next DRCIBelcher N I750 GTE Federal Credit Union IFinal DRC
Comments IO.30.03.doc
Page 3 of 3
-
e
LL
o
>-
()
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: Mw-\, Y- \ ~~r-..
FAX: .. 4-4-; - \ 7 2-4
Phone: 4 4- ~ l S I
FROM: ~ ~'-'\ ~ ~ Q.\ \ ~
\
DATE:~ ~a]lAJ 03 RE:
Phone:~\Q "2-- +S\)+
MESSAGE:
fL \) ~() 3 - \) ~ 1) 4- 7
I 7 ~\) N. 13~\t-~ I~.
\) itA- f'- T ~ _...Q..,~A--~ -h ' I 0 - ~ \)- 0 3
V(t.C... M~e. ~) .
NuTC:: ~\-. \.~~eaJ~1 ~r ~\: 3'\) ~
'1 0 " r crt;- :- ~fL I ~ 0 . M \A r- " L ~).
)
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 4
I
DATE,TIME
FA:< NO. /HAME
DURATIOH
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
.RA~~SMI~;SIOH \iER;FICATICJH REPO~
I r
1C/24 11: 11:,
944'31724
EH3: >=12: 1:::
>=14
OK
:3T AtmARD
ECt""
TIME 10/24/2003 11:18
['lAME F'lAtj
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
-,
I
I
I
!
J
e
--
11:30 a.m.
Case: FLD2003-09047 - 1750 North Belcher Road
Owner/Applicant: Be1Cal Properties, LLC.
Representative: Mr. Mark Klein (2040 NE Coachman Road, Clearwater, FL 33765; phone: 727-441-
1951; fax: 727-449-1724; email: mske@tampabay.rr.com).
Location: 3.288 acres located at the southwest comer of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street.
Atlas Page: 262B.
Zoning: IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow
direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate,
primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Proj ect, under the provisions of Section 2-13 04. C.
Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (GTE Federal Credit Union).
Neighborhood Association: None.
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Plalmer.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan BetTy, Wayne Wells, Duanne Anderson and Scott Rice.
Applicant/Representa tive:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) An Open Space dedication assessment is required only if the bldg coverage expansion is 50%
or more. Based on the site plan, the fee does not apply since the existing building coverage is
25,415 s.f. and only increasing to 26,228 s.f.
2. Stormwater:
a) In reference to BCP2003-03528, reminder that the subdrains must discharge directly to outfall
control stmcture. Plans submitted for this case indicate a subdrain flow to the pond; tlus
would result in a constant "wet" pond condition.
3. Tramc En!!:ineerin!!::
a) Traffic Impact Fee calculations incorrect on site plan. Traffic Impact Fee of the amount of
$14,661.08 must be paid prior to C.O. (TIF reflect current rates as adopted by Pinellas
County.)
b) Create handicapped accessible path from office building to public sidewalk along Belcher
Road per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). Also an
accessible route to and from on site buildings.
c) Show vehicle-stacking drive through lanes for barlie Since site plan shows 5 drive through
lanes please show these lanes to accommodate a total of 22 cars. Vehicles must not block
parking spaces or drive aisles. (City Community Development Code, Section 3-1404 3.B)
d) The applicant must provide a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development. The
expected trip volumes from the proposed site exceeds the City's threshold of 100 vph or 1,000
vpd. Prior to conducting a TIA make an appointrnent for a scoping meeting with Traffic
Operations Division (727) 562-4778.
e) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
4. General En!!:ineerin!!::
a) The Proposed 8" sanitary sewer main that serves the distribution center needs to be a
minimum of 5 ft. from any stmcture.
b) Separation from the 1" ,vater service line and the 8" sanitary sewer main can be less than 1 0
ft.
c) Since the sidewalk along Belcher Road is being constructed on the proposed site and not
within the public right-of-way, an easement for such will be required.
d) Continue the sidewalk along Belcher Road south of the driveway to the south property line.
May be placed similarly on-site like sidewalk north of the driveway (see also comment
regarding necessary easement).
e) All of the above required prior to CDB.
5. Plannin!!::
a) Revise the "applicant's name" on the application to "BelCal Properties, LLC." Show "BelCal
Properties, LLC" as the property owner.
b) Based on the building dimensions indicated on Sheet 2 of 11 for the St. Pete Times
Distribution Building (also addressed at 1750 North Belcher Road) and under BCP2003-
03528, the distribution building should be 14,346 square feet, not 14,215 square feet.
Revise/advise.
FLD2003-09047 - Page 1 of3
c) Revise S.l of 11, based on the distribution bUi1ding.g either 14,346 square feet or
14,215 square feet (see Comment 2 above), under "Zoning Compliance Notes" and "Impact
Fee Calculations" the distribution building from 16,700 square feet.
d) Revise Sheet 1 of 11 to indicate the parking requirement for the credit union at five spaces per
1,000 square feet (not three spaces per 1,000 square feet).
e) Revise Sheet 3 of 11 to indicate that existing driveways on Calumet Street no longer to be
used will be removed, similar to those on Belcher Road (saw-cut & remove existing
driveway).
f) Complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, since BelCal Properties, LLC is the owner.
g) Revise the responses to the General Applicability and the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project criteria to provide statements that explain how, what, when and where
the proposal of "retail sales (financial services)" meets the criteria, including the deviations
listed above at the start of the letter. Do not repeat back the criteria as the response. In
General Applicability criteria #2, please provide the anticipated improvement value of the
proposed credit union (may also include the anticipated improvement value of all site
improvements for the three buildings). Suggestion is to provide such responses as an
attachment to the application, allowing for full discussion of your responses to the criteria.
h) Provide the width of all landscape islands.
i) Unclear of the paved area at the northeast side of the proposed credit union (not shown to be
striped for parking). Also unclear the need for the small landscape island to the west of this
paved area. Advise/revise.
j) The note "car stop (typical)" with its arrow line at the northeast corner of the proposed credit
union is unclear what it is pointing to (Sheet 2 of 11). Advise/revise.
k) Unclear of the need for sidewalks greater than five feet on the north side of the proposed
credit union and on the east and west sides of the proposed office building. Also unclear as to
the need to concrete the north side of the proposed office building. Advise/revise.
1) All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-
site.
m) The interior landscape area provided on Sheet 7 of 11 in the Vehicular Use Are Tabulation is
different than that indicated in the vehicular use area diagram at the top ofthe page.
n) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required
screening. If located on the roof, note such.
0) Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
p) Provide sign package. Show location of proposed freestanding signage, including proposed
setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of proposed signage.
Include any proposed attached signage. Signs must be architecturally coordinated in terms of
design, color and style with the proposed buildings.
q) Provide the proposed building heights in terms of feet, in accordance with Code provisions
(see definition of "height, building or structure" for measurement of height).
r) For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), please provide rendered
(colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy).
s) Provide color samples (paint samples, etc.) of the proposed exterior building materials.
t) Since this overall site has three proposed buildings, please provide building elevations of the
other two proposed buildings (St. Pete Times distribution building and the office building).
Include proposed exterior building materials and colors.
u) Since a criteria for retail sales and services in the IRT District is that it take no access to a
major arterial street (Belcher Road), is it possible to remove the proposed driveway from
Belcher Road? Advise.
v) Since all existing structures are being removed as part of the redevelopment of this site and to
avoid confusion, remove from Sheet 2/11 the existing (ghosted) stmctures and pavement.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Inadequate solid waste service. Recommend at least two dumpster enclosures. Suggest
providing a recycling dumpster for St. Pete Times building.
7. Land Resources:
a) No comments.
8. Fire:
a) Revise landscape islands to ensure proper turning radii for fire trucks and delivery trucks to
access entire site.
9. Environmental:
a) No comment.
10. Communitv Response:
a) No comment.
11. Landscapinl!::
FLD2003-09047 - Page 2 on
-- -~
Per Secti_-1202.E.l table indicates that there must be h.m back of curb to back of curb
on interior islands.
b) There is an existing plan for the site which will need to be revised to show the changes in
parking / drive-thru layout and associated landscape changes.
Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade
with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and
egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent
trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one
shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area
shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover.
d) Plant sizes must be per Code Section 3-1202.B.
a)
c)
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments'
comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon.
FLD2003-09047 - Page 3 of3
-
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
October 6, 2003
Mr. Mark Klein
BelCal Properties, LLC
2040 NE Coachman Road
Clearwater, FL 33765
Re: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations
to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a
permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons
beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 3-1304.C (Case FLD2003-09047, 1750 North Belcher Road).
Dear Mr. Klein:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for Flexible Developmen~ approval to permit
retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow direct access to a rnajor arterial street
(Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to
allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 3-1304.C at 1750 North Belcher Road.
After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application
is complete. While not part of a completeness review, I have provided preliminary information
about the sufficiency of the application. More comments will be provided by the Development
Review Committee (DRC) prioho or at the DRCmeeting.
General Comments related to the sufficiency of the application:
1. Revise the "applicant's name" on the application to "BelCal Properties, LLC." Show
"BelCal Properties, LLC" as the property owner.
2. Based on the building dimensions indicated on Sheet 2 of 11 for the St. Pete Times
Distribution Building (also addressed at 1750 North Belcher Road) and under BCP2003-
03528, the distribution building should be 14,346 square feet, not 14,215 square feet.
Revise/ advise.
3. Revise Sheet 1 of 11, based on the distribution building being either 14,346 square feet or
14,215 square feet (see Comment 2 above), under "Zoning Compliance Notes" and
"Impact Fee Calculations" the distribution building from 16,700 square feet.
4. Revise Sheet 1 of 11 to indicate the parking requirement for the credit union at five
spaces per 1,000 square feet (not three spaces per 1,000 square feet).
BRIAN J. AUNGST, IvlAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, VICE IvLc\YOR-COMMISSIONER WHIT'lEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FAANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ,'~ BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
W
"EQUAl EMPLOY;v\ENT .A~'!D AFFlfu\L~T[VE ACTION EMPLOYER"
-
e
October 6, 2003
Klein - Page 2
5. Revise Sheet 3 of 11 to indicate that existing driveways on Calumet Street no longer to be
used will be removed, similar to those on Belcher Road (saw-cut & remove existing
driveway).
6. Complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, since BelCal Properties, LLC is the owner.
7. Revise the responses to the General Applicability and the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project criteria to provide statements that explain how, what, when and
where the proposal of "retail sales (financial services)" meets the criteria, including the
deviations listed above at the start of the letter. Do not repeat back the criteria as the
response. In General Applicability criteria #2, please provide the anticipated
improvement value of the proposed credit union (may also include the anticipated
improvement value of all site improvements for the three buildings). Suggestion is to
provide such responses as an attachment to the application, allowing for full discussion of
your responses to the criteria.
8. Provide the width of all landscape islands.
9. Unclear of the paved area at the northeast side ofthe proposed credit union (not shown to
be striped for parking). Also unclear the need for the small landscape island to the west
of this paved area. Advise/revise.
10. The note "car stop (typical)" with its arrow line at the northeast comer of the proposed
credit union is unclear what it is pointing to (Sheet 2 of 11). Advise/revise.
11. Unclear of the need for sidewalks greater than five feet on the north side of the proposed
credit union and on the east and west sides of the proposed office building. Also unclear
as to the need to concrete the north side of the proposed office building. Advise/revise.
12. For three buildings, unclear why only one dumpster is proposed for this site. Advise.
13. All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground
on-site.
14. The interior landscape area provided on Sheet 7 of 11 in the Vehicular Use Are
Tabulation is different than that indicated in the vehicular use area diagram at the top of
the page.
15. Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required
screening. If located on the roof, note such.
16. Since the sidewalk along Belcher Road is being constructed on the proposed site and not
within the public right-of-way, an easement for such will be required.
17. Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
18. Provide sign package. Show location of proposed freestanding signage, including
proposed setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of
proposed signage. Include any proposed attached signage.
19. Provide the proposed building heights in terms of feet, in accordance with Code
provisions (see definition of "height, building or structure" for measurement of height).
20. For presentation to the Community Development Board (CDB), it would be helpful to
have rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy).
21. Provide color samples (paint samples, etc.) of the proposed exterior building materials.
-
e
October 6, 2003
Klein - Page 3
Any responses to the above comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional
comments will be provided at the DRC meeting. The above comments and comments you will
receive at the DRC meeting must be addressed and revised documents submitted to the Planning
Department by noon on November 6,2003 (15 copies of all submittals).
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on October 30,
2003, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate
time that your case will be reviewed. You or a representative must be present to answer any
questions that the committee may have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. You can access
zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.c1earwater-fl.com.
*Make us your favorite!
Sincerely,
~~ w~:,~~
Senior Planner
I IlvIS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslUp for the lIext DRCIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union IBelcher N 1750
Complete Letter 9.8.03.doc
.
e
LL
o
>-
1-
u
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO:~t \( \ Q.. \ f'.._
FAX: .. +4--~ - \ 72-+
Phone: 4-4 l - \ ~ s J
FROM: ~-cl-_WQ.-\\S
DA TE:~ ~t) ~I ~ "3> RE:
Phone:~ lo 'L - 4- ~- 04-
MESSAGE: " ~ ~ \ t \-.t. -,
\.7Y"V N. 6~\~k~ ~~.
Ft-~ 2.Do 3 - 0 ~ lJ4-7
\~t\-V-. G ~ \~,~) ~Cl\"-i ~.( \~cl.
,)
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
4
.A~6MISSIOH \iEF.~IFICATIOH REPORT
L ~ ----.J
TIME 10/06/2003 11:49
r,jAME F'LAH
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624557
DATE, TItvlE
FAX HO.;HAME
DURA T IOt'-J
PA(iE (S)
RESULT
MODE
1[1/06 11:45
'34491724
00: 02: 11
04
m<
ST AHDAF.~D
ECr,"
I
I
I
I
---1
-
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Members of the Community Development Board
Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Plalmer \.Jt\\.J
FLD2003-09047, 1750 North Belcher Road
December 16, 2003
ORIGINAL
The Staff Report submitted to the Community Development Board (CDB) for the December 16,
2003, meeting was based on an analysis of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), requested and
reviewed by the City's Traffic Operations Division. The TIA was based on a proposed "bank,"
as there is no category for "credit union" by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The
credit union is proposed to close at 5 :00 pm daily, whereas identified peak traffic impacts occur
between 5:00 and 6:00 pm (based on "bank"). The Traffic Operations Division, after discussion
of the TIA with the applicant, has detennined that the credit union, as submitted, has different
characteristics than a bank and that modification of Conditions 2 and 3 in the Staff Report are
suggested. Should the credit union close in the future and a bank desire to open in this facility,
the roadway improvements of a left turn lane and traffic signal light are necessary.
The Staff recommendation for this case continues to be for APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow direct
access to a major mierial street (North Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a
separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C with the
bases contained in the Staff Report and the following amended conditions:
1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That use of the building on the subiect property be limited to a credit union with hours of
operation ending at 5:00 pm daily. The applicant shall record a covenant in the public
records restricting the use of this building on the subiect property, as contained in this
condition, prior to the issuance of a Celiificate of Occupancy for the credit union. Any future
change of use of this building to a bank shall require the following:
a. Constmction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left
turn lane of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida Department of
Transportation design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road.
Constmction of this improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank, for the future constmction of a traffic signal
light at the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted
by a Traffic Signal W arrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a
shared portion of the full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion
shall not exceed 50 percent of the full cost. If, in the event that a traffic signal
light is not warranted based on the Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant.
-
.
December 16, 2003
CDB Memo - Page 2
2. That, prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed credit union, revised plans be
submitted and appro'/ed showing the constmction a left turn lane of adequate storage length,
according to City and Florida Department of Transportation design standards, on Calumet
Street at North Belcher Road;
3. That, prior to the issuance of building pern1its for the proposed credit union, the applicant
establish an escro''v account "'lith the City for the future constmction of a traffic signal light at
the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if '.varranted by a Traffic Signal
\Varrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a shared portion of the full cost of a
traffic signal light. If, in the event that a traffic signal light is not v{arranted based on the
Study, funds '",ill be refunded to the applicant;
].4. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building
permits for the proposed credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
1~. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding
of the lighting by tree canopy; and
~6. That all sigt1age meet the requirements of Code and be desigt1ed according to a common
theme including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity. Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet
in height. Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is required for more than one
freestanding sign on either street frontage.
\\MS5cIPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX1Pending caseslUp for the next CDBIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (IRY) (CIRP-
retail sales)IMemorandum re amended conditions #2 + #3 12.16. 03.doc
-
.
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
December 16, 2003
FLD2003-09047
E4
BelCal Properties, LLC
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
1750 NOlih Belcher Road
OI?/G/N4L
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ST AFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to per111it retail sales (financial
services) with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial
street (North Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and
in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons
beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C.
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE:
Industrial, Research and Technology District (IRT)
Industrial Limited (IL)
PROPERTY SIZE:
3.288 acres
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use: Site plan approved under BCP2003-03528 for three
buildings: St. Petersburg Times distribution building (under
construction under BCP2003-03528) and two office buildings (no
building permits issued yet)
Proposed Use: St. Petersburg Times distribution building, office
building and GTE Credit Union
ADJACENT ZONING/
LAND USES:
North: Industrial uses
West: Vehicle repair (Hunter Blood Services - Bloodmobile)
East: Detached dwellings
South: Fire Station
Staff Report- Conummity Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 1
-
.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 3.288-acre site is located at the southwest comer of
North Belcher Road and Calumet Street. North Belcher Road is a heavily-traveled, four-lane
divided roadway. The east side of North Belcher Road is residentially developed with single-
family detached dwellings. The west side of North Belcher Road is developed industrially. The
site was formerly developed with an office building, which was recently demolished under
BCP2003-03525. Under BCP2003-03528, the site was approved to be developed with a St.
Petersburg Times distribution building on the west side facing Calumet Street and two office
buildings facing North Belcher Road. The site was approved with one driveway on Calumet Street
close to the westem property line and one driveway on North Belcher Road approximately 80 feet
north of the south property line. The St. Petersburg Times distribution building, as well as all
other parking, drainage and landscaping improvements, is currently under constmction.
Proposal: The proposal includes constmcting a GTE Federal Credit Union facing Calumet Street,
in place of the northern office building approved on the site plan under BCP2003-03528. Under
the Community Development Code, financial institutions (banks and credit unions) are included in
the definition of "retail sales and services." In the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT)
District, retail sales and services is pem1itted as a Flexible Standard Development use, but with
criteria prohibiting the use from locating contiguous to residentially zoned property and taking
direct access to major arterial streets, and with criteria restricting the use to occupying no more
than ten percent of a building used by a Minimum Standard Development use and that the use
primarily serve the employees or patrons of the industrial-type uses. Under the adopted
Countywide Plan Rules, financial services are included under the definition of "offices," which are
pem1itted secondary uses in the Industrial Limited (IL) land use classification. Due to its inclusion
under the definition of "retail sales and services" and its prohibitions and restrictions in the IRT
District, the applicant must request approval of the proposed credit union under the
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project process. Staff notes that these same prohibitions and
restrictions apply to restaurants desiring to locate within the IRT District. The site is not
contiguous to residentially zoned property, as North Belcher Road separates the non-residentially-
developed area on the west side from the residentially-developed area on the east side. The
proposed redevelopment ofthe site meets all of the development standards ofthe IRT District.
The applicant is requesting a deviation from the criteria prohibiting direct access to a major mierial
street. Because North Belcher Road is a divided roadway, the driveway near the southem property
line will permit only right in/right out tUl11ing movements. This driveway location was originally
approved for pel111itted uses (under BCP2003-03528). There is only one driveway approved on
Calumet Street. The change of use from an office building to a credit union should allow the
continued access to North Belcher Road to provide necessary on-site traffic flow.
The applicant is requesting a deviation to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate,
primary building. This Code restriction intends to limit the size and location of "retail sales and
services" in the IRT District, relegating the use to a more "accessory" use. The site plan presently
approved under BCP2003-03528 provides for three separate buildings. The proposed revision to
allow the credit union in place of the northem office building does not materially change the site
design otherwise already approved. If the site were to be developed at the maximum Floor Area
Ratio pel111itted of 0.65, the site could be developed with a maximum of 93,086 square feet. The
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 2
--
.
site is being redeveloped with a total of 26,346 square feet. The Code does not mandate or restrict
the development of property to one buildIng. Under the proposal, the 3,528 square-foot credit
union building is 13.4 percent of the total building square footage shown on the site plan, slightly
higher than the allowable ten percent maximum. Since the site is not being developed to its
maximum Floor Area Ratio and the site plan provides more than the required parking spaces, the
percentage increase requested is minimal. While the credit union could be developed in a larger
building of several tenants, the applicant has chosen to separate the tenant spaces into different
buildings based on their usage. This separation providing a primary building for the proposed
credit union should not degrade the intent of the IRT District. Other properties in this large
industrially zoned area west of North Belcher Road will continue to be developed for industrial-
type uses.
Finally, the applicant is requesting a deviation to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the
industrial area. The credit union is proposed within a large industrial area, albeit on the eastem
fringe of the industrial area. There is only one other financial institution in this general area. This
proposed credit union will enhance financial services to employees of this industrial area,
potentially reducing patron drive distances when services are necessary. It is recognized, however,
that patrons of the GTE Federal Credit Union may live or work on the east side of North Belcher
Road and would benefit by its location at this intersection. Staff reiterates that the Countywide
Plan Rules place financial services under "offices," which were originally proposed at this
location. A credit union at this location will be compatible with the sUlTounding area, will be in
harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, intensity and character of the adj acent properties and will
enhance and upgrade the character ofthis immediate vicinity.
The introduction of the proposed credit union does increase the anticipated traffic impact of the
development of this parcel. A Traffic Impact Analysis submitted by the applicant, and reviewed
by the City's Traffic Operations Division, indicates that intersection improvements are necessary.
The applicant will need to construct a left tum lane with adequate storage length on Calumet Street
at North Belcher Road. Additionally, the installation of a traffic signal light may be required, if
walTanted by a Traffic Signal WalTant Study. An escrow account with the City will need to be
established by the applicant for this potential future traffic signal light, where funds will be a
shared portion of the full cost of a traffic signal light (funds will be refunded if the traffic signal
light is not walTanted).
Foundation plantings for the proposed credit union will need to meet Code provisions on revised
plans prior to permitting. No freestanding sigI1age has been shown on the proposed site plan. Any
freestanding signage should be limited to monument-style of no more than six feet in height,
integI"ated with the design and color of the proposed buildings and into the proposed landscaping
to avoid shielding. More than one freestanding sign on either street frontage will require the
submission of a Comprehensive SigI1 Program. Placement of outdoor lighting fixtures should also
be integrated into the landscape design to also avoid shielding of the lighting by tree canopy.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability
criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-
1304.C) have been met.
Staff Report - Conununity Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 3
-
e
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA (Sections 2-1301.1 and 2-1302):
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.21 X
AREA RATIO (FAR)
(0.65)
IMPERVIOUS 0.72 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (0.85)
LOT AREA (20,000 143,210 square feet; 3.288 acres X
SQ. ft. minimum)
LOT WIDTH (200 Belcher Road: 380 feet X
feet minimum) Calumet Street: 377 feet
FRONT SETBACK Belcher Road: 20 feet (to pavement) X
(20 feet minimum) Calumet Street: 21 feet (to pavement)
REAR SETBACK (15 N/A (Comer lots have two front X
feet minimum) setbacks and two side setbacks)
SIDE SETBACK (15 West: 15 feet (to pavement) X
feet minimum) South: 30 feet (to pavement)
HEIGHT (50 feet St. Pete Times building: 20 feet X
maximum) Office building: 38 feet
GTE Credit Union building: 24 feet
PARKING SPACES 125 spaces X
(Distribution: 1.5/1000
sf; Office: 3/1 000 sf;
Retail: 5/1000 sf) (76
spaces reQ.)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 4
-
e
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-1304.C):
1.
The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
The use or mIX of uses within the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses.
Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of
uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the
shared parking fOl111Ula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
1. Development of the land will be in hannony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties.
2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. Development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity.
6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation
impacts on adjacent propeIiies.
Consistent Inconsistent
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
Consistent Inconsistent
[X] [ ]
[X] [ ]
[X] [ ]
[X] [ ]
[X] [ ]
[X] [ ]
Staff Report - Connnunity Development Board - December 16,2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 5
--
e
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
II/vJS5c1PDSIPlanning DepartlllentlC D BIFLE)(IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (fRT) (ClRP-
retail sales)IBelcher N 1750 Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 7
.
-
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
October 30, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to pennit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow direct
access to a major arterial street (North Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a
separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C for the
site at 1750 North Belcher Road, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1304.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to
development/redevelopment efforts of the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That, prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed credit union, revised plans be
submitted and approved showing the construction a left turn lane of adequate storage length,
according to City and Florida Department of Transportation design standards, on Calumet
Street at North Belcher Road;
3. That, prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed credit union, the applicant
establish an escrow account with the City for the future construction of a traffic signal light at
the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted by a Traffic Signal
Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a shared portion of the full cost of a
traffic signal light. If, in the event that a traffic signal light is not warranted based on the
Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant;
4. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building
pennits for the proposed credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
5. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding of
the lighting by tree canopy; and
6. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a COllli110n theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity. Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in
height. Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is required for more than one
freestanding sign on either street frontage.
Prepared by: Plmming Department Staff:
Wayn
Staff Report - COl1U11Unity Development Board - December 16, 2003 - Case FLD2003-09047 - Page 6
-
.
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Melone, Donald
Tuesday, December 02,2003 1 :51 PM
Wells, Wayne
Rice, Scott; Gluski, Roberta
RE: FLD2003-09047, 1750 N. Belcher Road
Doesn't engineering have a final inspection for this site which would bring up some of the issues set forth in the
conditions?
You have got to be kidding me on the meUnot met in conditions! If the fire department asked for a fire hydrant assembly to
be installed or I ask for a dumpster to have an enclosure before issuance of a C.O., does that mean that before the city will
issue a permit that they are to construct an enclosure and install the hydrant on a raw piece of property because it says
met or any other condition including zoning like perimeter landscaping is required ( the contractor is to install prior to
issuance of a permit), and list can go on, and on, ...........etc. Come on! I know you are going to say "I was just asking the
question"!
don
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, December 02,2003 11:53 AM
To: Melone, Donald
Subject: RE: FLD2003-09047, 1750 N. Belcher Road
Don -
Under BCP2003-03528, for that condition, you marked it "met," which means to me (and James Wagner) that it is
"done" and finished (no one will look at this again, even prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy). With
James' help, we copied and made this condition a "condition of C. O. Engineering," so now it will be picked up when
someone tries to obtain the C. O. In the future, if you are going to wait to get something prior to issuance of the C. 0.,
you should add the "condition of C. 0." so that Development Services will pick it up. Once you obtain the easement,
you would need to mark the condition as "met."
From my standpoint, I will not add this in as a condition on FLD2003-09047, as it is a condition on BCP2003-03528
now.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Melone, Donald
Sent: Tuesday, December 02,2003 11:19 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Rice, Scott; Gluski, Roberta
Subject: RE: FLD2003-09047, 1750 N. Belcher Road
The site permit that is active for 1750 N. Belcher Road, comment #22 in conditions is as follows: "Any/all
easements shall be obtained (recorded) prior to C.O. being issued........... etc. This comment can be found in
BCP2003-03528.
don
-----Original Messagen-n
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, December 02,20037:47 AM
To: Melone, Donald
Cc: Rice, Scott
Subject: FLD2003-09047, 1750 N. Belcher Road
1
-
.
Don -
A sidewalk is being constructed along Belcher Road on the subject property. My plans for FLD2003-09047
now states that a "seven-foot wide easement will be dedicated to the City of Clearwater." This sidewalk will be
constructed as part of the site improvements for the S1. Pete Times building (BCP2003-03528). How do you
get the easement? Should there be a condition on the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the S1.
Pete Times building? If so, will you take care of such? Or, do I need to place a condition on the Development
Order for FLD2003-09047? Please let me know today. Thanks.
Wayne
2
C'l "'~
o ~
o <r::
~ or,
~ If)
Sj ~
t--
t--
"T
o
0'\
o
I
~
o
o
N
9
~
o_,-,B 1:: Jj 0
:g~ ~ i:li{J '-' 1:5,-,8 1::
o.."a:j S bll~tIJ]~ a <,::;~~;:; c<l
~ '-' P ~.s;z;' <l) <.) 0 ..8 (J] .~ S 1:5 <B .~
~~~ ~~o~i{Jo~ .....~ ~o..... ~
~(J]~ B~o@B~~ 'e~o ~~~5 ~
ES~ <l)~ ~ 00 ~ Pi{J>Pp '-'
.~ ~ ~c<l61:5;Sop~ <r::~o~o ~
P 00 2 'H ~ ,~ <,::; ~ .........,. ~ U tl '" 0 S ...... .....
o ~ S 0 'C or, i{J (J] ;g 'S C i@ oJ ..e ,...., 'o.~ .~
tl \0 ~ S .2 ~ ~ '-' s::s S ~ g ~ "0 8:'~ ~
'-'\Dc<l PC:::-~i{J@ OP _~~oJo ~
g ::!;"' ~ ~ [) ~ ~ -- .-- 6 u ~ U 'C <3 J::: ~ @
O~(J] ~~6~~.~u (J] ~.....~oJ.~.....
.S '-H t;j oJ ~ 'p b i{J {J ~ oJ.S 1;:1"8 i{J ~ 'Fj i<J
~~~ ~~~~]>a~~1 ~~~g~ .~j
'p ::s [) c2..... ~ ~ ~ en '-' 0 p.., ~ <l) R' -: <r:: 0 0 ~
oJO~ ~,-,~......~~ui~p"", ~'-'~'Co .~~
::sEa '-'~o~ ~~O<l)~.~o ><l)U~U:::; ~,
~oJo 0 ~ 8('1~~~;s o~ c<l'H c<l6
'"@ 1) t) ~ (!) 0.. ~ ~ C'l 'Ed ~ .g ;.... t-< (1) b1) cd b u
o -B '-' ~ ~ ~'R '-' '-H '-' or, ~ ~ ~. B P ~ 12 &S
'-' '-H <H d) bll -'- is > 0 > '<j- 1ii ~ 1ii c'p i:; '-'
C1) 0 1) 0.. ~ U cd or- - ...... 0 ~ a ~ ;J <1.) ~ u -:5 ~D';;
~,-,"'" ~B,-,~~5o~~E""'oZSEa:!~'i '
u r~ ~ U cd ""do '-' V) ..... OH I ........ r'" 0 ........ 0...0 0 R bll . ~ -5
oJ_[-< ~~u~(J]c<l or,R~~R ~o .~~
o...........~ ~.. ~ oo~cd1)~B~1)u.E~~~
S i<J . ~ @ g.i ~.;::: ;> E 13 o'~ 0 >-.;.::: Ii; 2 B v r-- '~ z-.
~!qo~~~~]~oJ~~i<Jc<l~~'~.....<l)'<j-~~
~~U~E~B;s(J]O~~~~~~~~.oS~~s
1;:1 .~ 0 >-. 6:l (J]'~ 0 ~ S bil '-' ~ 'B '-' ~ ~ g; bll \0 <t:: ;::;
~-:cu......~i{J~~E.E~E,-,~Eoo .5~<r::.....
~'H o::s ::0 oCIJ o~~~ >~~ 0~~0"Cl ~ot; (J]
8 'C 0 ~ ;::j u E ~ Ed 0 ~ 'C bJ) 0..." ~ ~
;:::' [-< ~ U ('1 ~ <r:: ;::;)'(J] o:l ~ U '<j- ~ '1:: ~ P.. P.. > ~ t:, G' !::
~
~
0"
o
~>LI
---- I
;:q0:1
----
,....,
>LI
I
0:1
Q
.....:l
o
~
'-'
P
o
Z
or,
- 0
.. 0
..... ~
od
Q '<j-
('1
----
0\
P
.S
.....
c<l ;s
.~
P.. '-'
:::.::: ~ .;;:
u <r:: '-'
~:~ = 0:::
.:: .....
..... P bll
C. '-' P
~~~ .;: S ~ ~
<l)
<J ~ .~ 0
'" p u:::
.. S <l) 'H
Q 0 c<l
'-' .....
<r::o::: [-<
00 0
.c 0 t--
-0 0 0
I- :E <r:: Q
..... Q Q
<J
~ .....:l .....:l
~ ~
-
'-H c<l .....
o ~ P .
c 1:5..0 5;l:i"8
(Lj <'::;~ObllgJ
S tJ~~=..o<l)
-B1ij gc<l;soJ"8B
;s is ~ ~ g .~ ~ B
v 0 ~ ~ i{J.~ 1;3 ~
S.g u.~ <l) - ;s ,~
~'c 'o;l:i^ ~ E -0 ~
U .2 C ~.s oJ P ~
blli:I., U"@.!8'o (J] S
5-B C)SnS~.E~
~ ~ -B.~ <H 0 bll .....
i13ffi -:s~~u:'=:Q)
8 c.gj .~ ~ t=: ::s"@:::
- .~..... ~ ~ .~il ~
E U .g ~ ,..., ~.:S V~ Uj
B&gg .-J4-<0v
5~t5i:S~~;::~2
..... b1J Sb oJ .~ ]j 6 ~ '-'
~ ] .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro -E
o~ '-'bilO ~ c> 8.] 6
:=ro~Cl)t);:>--o-.;....l.;:
52 ~ 8 oJ 2 c
!!i7:i:8 '-' ^' Sb2!;,~
~ 1- ""d ....., .,...... U) CJ -:=
(/) 2 (3 'S: ~ [/) ~ tU V)
R gJ @< 0 .p .~ '-' -B '-'
oo<.::.....<8~~ ~
U '-' oJ p.., <l) c<l R.S
~~~SB~i3:::::5
~
i>
::::
1:)
-<
1A
'"
u
~
U
.8
.....
.2
5..
1:!
o:l
.~
~
~
~
i{J
~
~
o:l
'-'
~
.8
'-'
>
o
.D
c<l
.5
'-H
o
~
~
r--
'<j-
'-H
o
'-'
~il
p..,
C<) :::8 ~ - - ~
0 <ll
0 ~ ..0 i'S
N C<) .,.., '"0 ';;
----- Vl .~ >:: .",
N ~ oj "
----- 0\ '" ~
N N <ll >:: ~ 1A
...... ... oj 00 '"
t'- ." B u
<ll .~
~ -B
b <.i:< '"0 .S
'" q:: @ q::
~ Vl <ll N ill
-B '+-< E ......
0 '+-< CI
>:: 6 <ll 00
'@ ;::l .~ ~6u
6 ....
aJ '~ o .~ >--
q:: >::CO
~ oj I-< 'E CI
<ll 0
'" <ll t;j ...... oj~
~~ i$ ~ <ll......
.,..,"'" ...... ;o! B~ P-.
.~ "2 ."
<ll [2 '" ~ U
'" <ll -B "0 CO
00 >:: B ~ aJ E--< '+-<
13Eill <ll ~ ~ 0
<.i:< ..0 <ll <ll
'" 83 t5 @ ~ u
>:: CO >::
8..uCl 0 u -< oj
o >:: .~ ~ '" <ll CO Ell
I-< 0 '@ i@ i;J .~
P-. '.p n5 I-< P- I-<
oj 6 P-. OJ
OJ ;::l !5 fr I '" P-. 0
..<::..0 ~ .,..,
E--< '5 t) if] aJ CO ~ , s ~
::l ~ ~
,,-.,.~ p '-"'0 'J::
...... '"0 '" M '" M = 0 P-. Z
C<) C<) C<) rC) C<) '" rC) C<) C<)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
~I 0 Cfl 0 rs 0 rs 0 Cfl 0 ~ N rs 0 rs 0 rs 0 rs
N > N N N ~ N ~I ----- N ~ ~
----- ----- rs ----- rs ----- ----- N rs ----- rs rs rs
Cfl ""'" ,...., N \0 ""'" C<) ...... \0 N \0
N ----- ----- N ----- ----- ----- -----
N 0 0 ----- 0 N 0
----- ----- ......
0\ ...... ...... 0\ ...... ...... ...... ......
rs rs ~ rs rs rs rs
eJl t-- rs rs ~I rs rs rs rs
=
.... ...,. 0
..... 0 0:::
~ 0\
.... 0 0:::
~ I W
f'f'l
>-. 0 J: ""'"
'+-<
..... 0 () 0
.... r'l ...I N
., 9 w OJ
.... III ~IJ
..... ill ill ill ill ill ill ill
<:J P-.
< ~ z Z Z Z Z Z z. z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q) =It: 10 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
~ CI) I"-
~ en ....
U ~ OJ <ll OJ <ll 0 U 0 0 <ll
U >:: q q q q q
0 0 0 0 i$ 0 i$ i$ 0
Z Z Z Z p:: Z p:: p:: z
'" r<) rC) '" C<) C<) C<)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N
----- N N ----- N N N
0 ----- ----- t'- ----- ----- -----
\0 rC) \0 N \0
C<) ----- ----- N ----- ----- -----
----- 0 0 ----- 0 N 0
...... ...... ...... 0 ...... ...... ......
C<) M r<) r<) r<) C<) C<) C<) C<) C<)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'"
N N N N N N N N ~ N
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
P- '"
.S 0
I-< '" .,..,
i$ P-. <ll q u
'"0 q .S oj
OJ OJ bIJ <ll P-
A Q) '"0 .,..,
'> ,S ;:; oj S
:::.::: u "i u "5
0 <ll oj P <ll >-<
~:~ c ~ P ::l 0 ~ u u i$
,~ oj ..0 '"0 '"0 Cil ~
bIJ '" ~ 0 ~ >. <ll U 4-< '-l
- ,S .,.., U <ll .,.., oj '>
~~i Q. q 0 '@ ;;. oj I-<
'j:; I-< '+-< 5 <ll <ll <ll
<ll <ll E--< 0 :::8 I-< bIJ E-< ~
<,; <ll S I-< Cfl U oj g
'" q q I-< <ll I-< q
OJ ;:l <ll <ll '"0 Cil
~ '51J u oj p ~ ..... 0 <ll it '@ '"
0 p:; ..... <ll U I-< <ll bIJ
;::: <ll <ll I-< :::8 I-< <ll <ll <ll <ll
ill Q P-< .....:i 0 .....:i Q E-< Q~ > ~ .....:i
0 Vl en 0 ""'" 00 0 \0 Vl 0
-0 ~ 00 ""'" C<) C<) ""'" C<) ...... ...... \0
0 N N N N 0 ...... 0 0 0
.... :~ CI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CI
.,.., Q CI CI CI CI CI Q Q Q Q
<,;
< .....:i .....:i .....:i .....:i .....:i .....:i .....:i .....:i .....:i .....:i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r<1 :;s
:5 <(
C"l r<1
N <n
---- 0\
s::l C"l
I:'--
el)r---
.s ""1' C
~ ~ 0::
..... 0 0::
~ M W
".O:I:
~ 0 ()
.S: N ...J
;: 9 ~
~~z
-< 0
Q):f:l:1O
rIJ Cl.l.....
~ "'....
u~
::'::u
~:~
~~~
-0
u
I-
<'I
o
o
~
'1"
.......
----
o
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
C"l
----
0\
:::
Il)
'~
Il)
~
Il)
o
!3
o
U)
Il)
~
'"1j
~
oj
.....1
o
<n
o
o
o
.....1
r.r.,
-
~d:l Cl
~s ,~ :a >=
s 0,.,,1
,~ ..g ~ 0
~U)(J)C/.)
]~:sg;]
5l p:; "2~ ~
1;:; ,8, tZl
-:S ~ [/J
IiJBj:j----:
'"1j u ~ >=: ~
.~ E E .g ;:2
1iJ~~;olLl
..... 00 >=:lLl
^tJ<H 8;z:
~ 8 ,S "0 G
~()~6Z
S' ~ :8 p. lLl
",,'flf7j ~
O;:J <l) c.)
~ooj~_;~
o <l)
o~13~;;:
N'. .~ ;> r-
~~'g~~z
~ ......~ 0 ~ lLl
1:5;0 ~ oo~
5 5bu ojf-<~
53 a .~ .5 ::: 0
~fj-:5+-J~U
.....U)..........~o
E;oc8~;S:Z
<(I
~
r<1
o
~ ~]
t::tZl
.......
.......
" I
o
o
~ <(I
~o
----
o
~I
tZl
<(I
o
lLl
Z
o
o
lLl
Z
o
o
<l)
~
o
Z
Il)
~
o
Z
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
I:'--
---
.......
.......
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
00
----
o
.......
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
C"l
----
0\
""
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
C"l
----
0\
:::
<l)
'~
<l)
~
[j
~
oj
~
.....
o
.....
tZl
:::
Il)
.~
Il)
~
Il)
.....
~
o
.......
o
Cl
Cl
....:l
r.r.,
o
C"l
o
Cl
Cl
....:l
r.r.,
0IJ1l)
;Q{J
.D ~
<l) 8
~ "a'~
~ ~ ~ 0
>-. 'U'J oj ~
'"2 Il) IiJ 1ij
o ~ 6 oj
"O>=:u $l
~OOIJ ttl
'::1 ] .S 4-i '"1j
[oj;g~5
U)CO~C"lS
.~ ....... C'1 0
ti ~ gjl 0' d3
6 0 '.p C'1 ~
S ,~ 0
~""'o63;J)Il)
OJ .~
~ '* j:j ,~ i':
>=: :;; ~ ?:l 1!J
.S en g tJ B
~ o~ 'w ;:: ~ ~
;0 >-. . >-. ~ 9
.~ '"& ~ '"d (J'J
1:5~p.O;.=:o
8.8.C'd"O@'U
(/l~~@Q)5
>=<l)~'HttlliJ
<l)~g~g.1ij
8~"O:;;~ S
56 <l).,-)::l::l
"",U~C'1~"O
"I
o
o~
;:a;s:
.:::0
o
~
;s:
Cl
lLl
Z
o
o
Il)
~
o
Z
'"
o
o
C"l
---
'-0
.......
----
o
r<1
o
o
C"l
---
'1"
C'1
----
0\
:::
Il)
.~
Il)
~
o
Il)
~
a<l
~
.....
oj
p..,
o
r<1
o
o
o
....:l
r.r.,
<'I
o
o
C"lt)
----.....,
Sf-<
----
.......
t)
.....,
f-<
t)
.....,
f-<
lLl
Z
o
o
Il)
~
o
Z
PI
o
o
C"l
----
o
.......
----
.......
.......
r<1
o
o
~
'1"
C"l
----
0\
r<1
o
o
C'1
---
'1"
C'1
----
0\
:::
Il)
.~
Il)
~
B
U)
oj
;s:
:Q
'0
tZl
o
'1"
o
Cl
Cl
....:l
r.r.,
r<1
o
~;s:
~~
C"l
.......
~
~
lLl
Z
o
o
Il)
~
o
Z
r<1
o
o
C"l
---
.......
---
C"l
.......
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
("I
----
0\
,to:
U)
>
Il)
.....
VJ
o
'1"
-<
Cl
....:l
r.r.,
""
o
23
r:::
o
~
Cl
of)
o
~~
;e~
o
.......
~
~
lLl
Z
o
o
Il)
~
o
Z
of)
o
o
N
---
'-0
----
o
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
C"l
----
0\
bJ)
'5
Il)
Il)
:;s
u
~
o
o
'1"
o
<(
o
....:l
r.r.,
-
f-<
~
U
>-.
.D
13
Q)
Ci..
>=
o
u
-0
Z
of)
o
~~
~~
C"l
.......
~
~
lLl
Z
o
o
Il)
~
o
Z
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
C"l
----
N
.......
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
C"l
----
0\
:::
Il)
'~
Il)
~
~
u
'-0
.......
o
o
o
....:l
r.r.,
of)
o
~~
;e~
o
.......
tZl
~
lLl
Z
o
o
Il)
~
o
Z
of)
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
~
0\
'"1j
Il)
;>
'a:)
o
Il)
.....
~
.8
.....
oj
,S:l
.......
p.
<
o
.......
o
<(
o
....:l
r.r.,
vi
'E
;0
>=
o
u
:B
tZl
;s:
;s:
""
f;::>
'-0
23
Of)
o
~~
;e~
o
.......
~
~
o
.....1
o
::r:
Il)
~
o
Z
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'-0
----
o
.......
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
C"l
----
0\
~
Il)
.~
Il)
~
bJ)
,S
~
o
N
C"l
.......
o
Cl
Cl
.....1
r.r.,
~
i>
'>
'.0
u
-<
~
'"
u
en
>=:
o
'p
~
o
u
<l)
<l)
U)
r<1
o
~o
Rs <(I
o
.......
o
<(I
Cl
.....1
o
::r:
'1"
'H
o
""
Il)
~
0...
Il)
~
o
Z
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
0\
C"l
----
0\
r<1
o
o
C"l
----
'1"
C"l
----
0\
:::
Il)
'~
Il)
~
bJ)
~
'~
o
U)
'"1j
~
oj
....:l
'1"
.......
o
o
o
....:l
r.r.,
C') ~ e -- ~
0
0 -< i-
N C')
--- <n ">
N ".,
--- 0\ "
N <<
,...., N ~
t""- '"
U
eJ)t--
.S "T C
...... 0 ""
~O'I'"
..... 0 0::
~ M W
>,O::I:
...... 0 U
'S: N...J
;: 9 ~
~~z
~ 0
a.I=l:t:1()
~ '"-l r-..
~ "-l....
U13
::':::u
~:~
~~~
-0
:0
Q)
~~
~
C')
o
~~
t""- I
___VJ
,....,
,....,
<l)
= >:. ~I
QI:l:lVJ
Q)
....
0:
Q
C')
..... 0
Q) 0
.... C'1
0: ___
Q ~
---
0\
S:
<l.l
":;
<l.l
~
(;j
c .....
o q
; 1.)
.~ E
<oJ 0
il:l ,...,
Q "~
~
I-
N
c3
:~ Q
tJ Q
-< .....:l
>.r.,
~
z
C')
o
~~
~~
o
,....,
~
~
~
z
o
Q
<l.l
q
o
Z
C')
o
o
C'1
---
\0
---
o
,....,
(f)
o
o
N
---
"1"
N
---
0\
S:
<l.l
":;
<l.l
~
~
.....
[/]
ro
~
;:;
.D
t;;
:r::
o
0\
o
Q
Q
.....:l
>.r.,
"1"
'-
o
"1"
<l.l
~
0..
e
Conditions Associated Wit'
FLD2003-09047
1750 N BELCHER RD
.:..t'jlIl"",~
~j'~I'II'<!""''''
,{4.. """.r.<,:".~t......
Il,-!:'._/,j, ~'".~~'''
:l::S:"',.<,)"l,/.,~9f/ff; "1::-
"CC7'^^ ^ ~.q..
':or:; ^ ^H^ ^ t::::i:
~ikuu"'~~~
-#",..)tTE~. ,1,1
Building Fac"<fll'~'[andscape Cc
12/03/2003 12/3/2003 - (A_D)
Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall... ...composed of at least two accent trees (or
palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for
every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain
shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. Revise plan to meet Code for plantings in area.
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
11/14/2003
revise plan to show 4' sidewalk and 5' landscape. revise plan to meet Code for plantings in area.
10/9/2003
Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with
frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress,
within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm
equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20
square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with
the remainder to be ground cover.
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775
11/25/2003 Construct intersection turn lanes along Calumet with adequate storage length per City and the
Florida Department of Transportation Design standards.
11/25/2003 Provide an escrow account with the City of Clearwater for the future construction of a traffic signal
light, if warranted by a Traffic Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account can be a
shared portion of the full cost of a traffic signal light. If in the event that a traffic signal light is not
warranted based on the study, then the funds will be refunded back to the applicant.
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504
11/20/2003 11/20/03 - WW - revised plans submitted with note (include as a condition on D.O.).
11/14/03 - WW - Followup letter sent to applicant expressing concern for note on plans.
1 0/6/03 - WW
Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
11/20/2003 11/20/03 - WW - Note on plans to be later. Add as a condition on D.O.
11/14/03 - WW - Followup letter sent to applicant.
10/6/03 - WW
Provide sign package. Show location of proposed freestanding signage, including proposed
setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of proposed signage.
Include any proposed attached signage.
Print Date: 12/02/2003
1 of 1
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
CaseConditons
-
-
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Elbo, Bennett
Tuesday, November 25,200311 :13 AM
Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott
Bertels, Paul; Brinson, Ryan
FLD 2003-090407(1750 N. Belcher Road)
Gentlemen,
I have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis (date conducted Nov, 2003) submitted by Mr. Roy Chapman from Florida
Design Consultants, Inc.. Attached is a copy of the letter that will be sent to Mr. Chapman. I also placed traffic conditions
into the permit plan under case number FLD 2003-090407. These conditions are necessary to improve the turning delays
encountered at the intersection of Belcher/Calumet at build out.
If you have questions please call me.
~
TIA calumet &
belcher.doc
Bennett Elba
Traffic Operations Division
(727)562-4775
belbo@clearwater-fl.com
1
e
e
November 25,2003
Mr. Roy E. Chapman, P.E.
Vice President of Transportation Services
Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
6321 Grand Boulevard
New Port Richey, FL 34666
Re: 1750 North Belcher Road (FLD 2003-09047)
SW comer of Belcher/Calumet
Dear Mr. Chapman:
After reviewing the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted by your finn in November,
2003 per reference, I submit the following conclusions.
The unsignalized intersection of Belcher and Calumet has an existing Level of Service
(LOS) of "F". The approach delay as indicated in Table 3 of the TIA shows 77 seconds.
The proposed development will increase the delay to 109.5 seconds which is a 43%
increase in delay. This is a significant increase in delay which is already operating at a
LOS of "F".
The Florida legislature passed the 1985 Growth Management Act which enables local
agencies to enforce necessary mitigation to the developer in order to maintain or better
the LOS. As a measure to decrease the delay at the intersection, I offer the following
conditions:
· Construct intersection turn lanes along Calumet with adequate storage
length per City and the Florida Department of Transportation Design
standards.
· Provide an escrow account with the City of Clearwater for the future
construction of a traffic signal light, if warranted by a Traffic Signal
Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account can be a shared portion
of the full cost of a traffic signal light. If in the event that a traffic signal
light is not wananted based on the study, then the funds will be refunded
back to the applicant.
-
.
If you have questions, please give me a call at (727)562-4775.
Sincerely,
Bennett Elbo
Traffic Operations Engineer
cc: Paul Bertels, Traffic Operations Manager, City of Clearwater
Scott Rice, P.E., Land Development Engineering Manager, City of Clearwater
Wayne Wells, Senior Plamler, City of Clearwater
U:\My Documents\TIA calumet & belcher.doc
.
e
11 :30 a.m.
Case: FLD2003-09047 - 1750 North Belcher Road
Owner/Applicant: BelCal Properties, LLe.
Representative: Mr. Mark Klein (2040 NE Coachman Road, Clearwater, FL 33765; phone: 727-441-
1951; fax: 727-449-1724; email: mske(a)tampabav.rr.com).
Location: 3.288 acres located at the southwest comer of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street.
Atlas Page: 262B.
Zoning: IRT, Industrial, Research and Technology District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow
direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate,
primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Proj ect, under the provisions of Section 2-13 04. C.
Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (GTE Federal Credit Union).
Neighborhood Association: None.
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Dumme Anderson, Tom GleIm, Don Melone and
Scott Rice.
ApplicantlRepresentative: Jeny Figurski, Mark Klein, Steve Klein
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) An Open Space dedication assessment is required only if the bldg coverage expansion is 50%
or more. Based on the site plan, the fee does not apply since the existing building coverage is
25,415 s.f. and only increasing to 26,228 s.f.
2. Stormwater:
a) In reference to BCP2003-03528, reminder that the sub drains must discharge directly to outfall
control structure. Plans submitted for this case indicate a sub drain flow to the pond; this
would result in a constant "wet" pond condition.
3. Traffic Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) Traffic Impact Fee calculations inconect on site plan. Traffic Impact Fee of the amount of
$14,661.08 must be paid prior to e.O. (TIF reflect current rates as adopted by Pinellas
County.)
b) Create handicapped accessible path from office building to public sidewalk along Belcher
Road per (Florida Building Accessibility Code Chapter 11, Section 11.4.3.2). Also an
accessible route to and from on site buildings.
c) Show vehicle-stacking drive through lanes for bank. Since site plan shows 5 drive through
lanes please show these lanes to accommodate a total of 22 cars. Vehicles must not block
parking spaces or drive aisles. (City Community Development Code, Section 3-1404 3.B)
d) The applicant must provide a Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development. The
expected trip volumes from the proposed site exceed the City's threshold of 100 vph or 1,000
vpd. Prior to conducting a TIA make an appointment for a scoping meeting with Traffic
Operations Division (727) 562-4778.
e) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
4. General Enl!:ineerinl!::
. a) The Proposed 8" sanitary sewer main that serves the distribution center needs to be a
minimum of 5 ft. from any structure.
b) Separation from the 1" water service line and the 8" sanitary sewer main can be less than 1 0
ft.
c) Since the sidewalk along Belcher Road is being constructed on the proposed site and not
within the public right-of-way, an easement for such will be required.
d) All ofthe above required prior to CDB.
5. . Planninl!::
a) Revise the "applicant's name" on the application to "BelCal Properties, LLe." Show "BelCal
Properties, LLC" as the propelty owner.
b) Based on the building dimensions indicated on Sheet 2 of 11 for the St. Pete Times
Distribution Building (also addressed at 1750 North Belcher Road) and under BCP2003-
03528, the distribution building should be 14,346 square feet, not 14,215 square feet.
Revise/advise.
Page 1 01'3
c) Revise S. 1 of 11, based on the distribution building _g either 14,346 square feet or
14,215 square feet (see Comment 2 above), under "Zoning Compliance Notes" and "Impact
Fee Calculations" the distribution building from 16,700 square feet.
"d) Revise Sheet 1 of 11 to indicate the parking requirement for the credit union at five spaces per
1,000 square feet (not three spaces per 1,000 square feet).
e) Revise Sheet 3 of 11 to indicate that existing driveways on Calumet Street no longer to be
used will be removed, similar to those on Belcher Road (saw-cut & remove existing
driveway).
f) Complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, since BelCal Properties, LLC is the owner.
'g) Revise the responses to the General Applicability and the Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project criteria to provide statements that explain how, what, when and where
the proposal of "retail sales (financial services)" meets the criteria, including the deviations
'f listed above at the start of the letter. Do not repeat back the criteria as the response. In
General Applicability criteria #2, please provide the anticipated inlprovement value of the
proposed credit union . (may also include the anticipated improvement value of all site
improvements for the three buildings). Suggestion is to provide such responses as an
attachment to the application, allowing for full discussion of your responses to the criteria.
h) Provide the width of all landscape islands.
i) Unclear of the paved area at the northeast side of the proposed credit union (not shown to be
striped for parking). Also unclear the need for the small landscape island to the west of this
paved area. Advise/revise.
j) The note "car stop (typical)" with its arrow line at the northeast corner of the proposed credit
union is unclear what it is pointing to (Sheet 2 of 11). Advise/revise.
k) Unclear of the need for sidewalks greater than five feet on the north side of the proposed
credit union and on the east and west sides of the proposed office building. Also unclear as to
the need to concrete the north side ofthe proposed office building. Advise/revise.
1) All utilities, including electlic, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-
site.
m) The interior landscape area provided on Sheet 7 of 11 in the Vehicular Use Are Tabulation is
different than that indicated in the vehicular use area diagram at the top of the page.
n) Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required
screening. If located on the roof, note such.
0) Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
p) Provide sign package. Show location of proposed freestanding signage, including proposed
setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of proposed signage.
Include any proposed attached signage. Signs must be architecturally coordinated in terms of
design, color and style with the proposed buildings.
....' q) Provide the proposed building heights in terms of feet, in accordance with Code provisions
(see definition of "height, building or structure" for measurement of height).
r) For presentation to the Connnunity Development Board (CDB), please provide rendered
(colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy).
~ .s) Provide color samples (paint samples, etc.) of the proposed exterior building materials.
..0 Since this overall site has three proposed buildings, please provide building elevations of the
other two proposed buildings (St. Pete Times distribution building and the office building).
Include proposed exterior building materials and colors.
u) Since a criteria for retail sales and services in the IRT District is that it take no access to a
major arterial street (Belcher Road), is it possible to remove the proposed driveway from
Belcher Road? Advise.
v) Since all existing structures are being removed as part of the redevelopment of this site and to
avoid confusion, remove from Sheet 2/11 the existing (ghosted) suuctures and pavement.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Inadequate solid waste service, Recommend at least two dumpster enclosures. Suggest
providing a recycling dumpster for St. Pete Tinles building.
7. Land Resources:
a) No connnents.
8. Fire:
a) Revise landscape islands to ensure proper turning radii for fire trucks and delivery U1ICks to
access entire site.
9. Environmental:
a) No C0llll11ent.
10. Communitv Response:
a) No C0llll11ent.
11. Landscapinl!::
Page 2 of 3
Per Secti.-1202.E.l table indicates that there must be b_m back of curb to back of curb
on interior islands.
b) There is an existing plan for the site which will need to be revised to show the changes in
parking / drive-thru layout and associated landscape changes.
Per Section 3-l202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade
with frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and
egress, within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent
trees (or palm equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one
shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area
shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover.
Plant sizes must be per Code Section 3-l202.B.
a)
c)
d)
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans and application material addressing all above departments'
comments by Thursday, November 6, 2003, no later than noon.
I IMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending cases I Up for the next DRCIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit UnionlFinal DRC
Comments 10.30.03.doc
Page 3 of 3
~
r<o :::.E
g p..,
N 00
N 0
.--< 0
----. 0
.--<
.--< "1"
'0
QJ
:a~'
:3'
<:',
o
~~
S:l~
----.
.--<
.--<
~t-
.5 '-.:t' c
~ ~ a:
.- 0 a:
~ rA w
>.oJ:
... 0 u
.> N...J
~ 9 ~
~~z
-< 0
Q)::j:j:Ln
rI'l Q)......
~ "'....
u~
QJ
-
~
Q
:::':::u
~:~
~~t
-0
;:1
.S
'(;j
.~
P-
c .<
~ ~
'5 ~ 1
~ ~"d:)
Q S ~
--<0:::
00
~g
:E --<
ti Q
< H
~
I-
o_oB ~ .s 0
:9gj ~ - g~ ~ so:~t
.a~ Sbll uslii 1'0 .... <+=<.<::::: 2:;>
<:: 0 = ;:g.S iLl . 0 ~ 8' 0 '" .1iJ -:::; .... <8 0 .....
~~~ ._~~~~~~ ~~ ~~o~ s~
o..",~ B~Olii.<::~~ '~~o ~<J:1~5 ",80
~~~ 8~~~""""""q 8~ ~~~~;:1 ~~<J:1
= 00 2 S ~ N <8 ~ ~.q 0.. U ~ ~ S ......o=..~ q iA ~
o c:: 0.. 0 'C r<j ~ {J ;g = ~ gj'~ ... U -<;:; ,~
o\(;..g 6.9,,: 1ii 0 8;j~ ~~ E~6 g:i5 .81:4-:
o \0 ro .2 c:::: .--< ~ '" 0 = ...... 0.. '"d .... ...... 0
~~'" _~ .....Do u~ u......-o<::'" oEe
0_ oj .<:: 0 ;:1bJJo..u 0 >-'-< ~.t::.<:: O:l B 'C'oj S
g~'" ......O"O;j"'~U gje ~'"d"'0...... 0..=......
.R~B ro'"d~ooo~ -? ~oo~~ ~~
"'o~ O"rou....=>_ -~ ~_Hoj~ ~.....
..... ..... 0 0 <l)'<:: oj ...... ill ;td..... c- u..c; = (I) ~ (I)
5~~ -0:::00......- UZ......~ roO-l'Oo.. ~
'+=I;j[l P- ^~'<::ui'--'OO::,:,,:: <l)~~;::;0 ~<l)oj
i~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ lj0~~ ~~~
- <l) ~ a:5 ~ bll.<:: ~ ."" ~ ~ .... t-< (I) ro <l) .~ .^
~ .<:: r: w ~ _ e...... -~. 0!iJ 0... .<:: gjl.... ~..... ~o
<l)~~ xbll~S2~~~~-'<:: ..................~f'-< ~~]
<l) 0 0. e U ~ .r-" o-;;:l 'C 0 ;j (5 ill ;g 5 ..;g u .s ~ ~
~~.... ~2<l)~~~'"d~~sZ88a3~'~ ~~E
~&~ ~~8~~~~M~~8~~~8~oo~]~~
0..0,--, eoj ......~oo;:1uO u~ ......~wou<l)O
8 ro ':04 ro ~ ~..c; 0...... u 0;':::: U ;>.,;':::: > 2 B t) ~ 0 0..
7; 0.. q 0'<:: 0 :=: ~ {i ~ a'13 0.. ~ ro o...g '0; .... 0 "i" -5 2 B q
~8u~B:9B~ 0"'rJ3~~~~'"d'"d.08~~p....~~
~7;0;>"~""o;o1ii8bll Oi~0~~~~~~<l);j~
~ S ~ '5 U ~ ~ ti 0.. @ .;:i ~"t: 0 I t: 0 0 '5. ~:< t: :2 0
roO-' ~u Ou""'~ >.<:: 8'8'"Clo~ -5;-,
~~'cUO~;j~~~U~Uo~'c.~~........o..u~~~'''''';~
-c- 0.. M O"......r") '" ro 0.. "i"'"d.....<n 0..0..> ",,--,\O-'"d "'M
r<o
o
~ 0:::1
t::r:/)
.--<
.--<
r<o
o
~ 0:::1
t::r:/)
-
.--<
~
I
ill
0:::
1
r:/)
Q
H
o
~
~
z
o
Q
<l)
;:1
o
Z
o
5
z
r")
o
o
N
----.
t-
----.
.--<
.--<
r<o
o
o
N
----.
"i"
M
----.
0\
r<o
o
o
M
----.
"i"
M
----.
0\
~
<l)
':;'
o
0:::
b1l
;:1
~
u
!+1
~
ro
~
~
III
':;'
III
0:::
b1l
.S
....
III
III
P
.....
b1l
;:1
~
o
t-
o
Q
Q
H
~
o
00
o
Q
Q
H
~
-~
-
'~
'"
00
III
-B
'"d
1ii
III
;.@
o
~
'"d
;:1
oj
~
.~
.s
~
s:liLI
~8
~~
'13 ~
53 ~ 's q
~~~~
-.E~3
~..;g~
-a3f'-<
15;:10
..... III Z
OJ [il .
U,........ ::
::::: VJ 0)
'OJ gj ~
6P;<~
!iJ$
~
III
'"
III
'S: :04
~o
o
.....
'"P
@
<J:1
e
o
'.g
.....
ro
0..
III
r:/)
]
~ u
("<') =
("<')
o
Or:/)
~>
"1",....,
N
----.
0\
<l)
p
o
Z
r")
o
o
N
----.
"1"
N
----.
0\
.S
'1j
o
..c:
u
ro
p
ro
'"
1:1
III
;::::
S p
u oj
op:;
Qp..,
<n
"i"
N
--<
Q
H
~
~
i-
.;;:
..",
"
-<
1A
'"
u
("<')
o
Or:/)
~~
N
----.
0\
r")
~
o
III
[?Jl
p..,
III
;:1
o
Z
'"
o
o
N
----.
"i"
N
0\
0..
o
0':;
gf
'B
;::l
~
o
f'-<
~ 6:)
~ ~
.30
<n
r")
N
--<
Q
H
~
M :::E
g p-<
N 0
----- .......
N
....... 0
----- 0
.......
....... """
OJ)t--
.s "'1' 0
t; ~ 0::
.... 0 0::
~ rA w
>,OJ:
... 0 ()
. > ("l ..J
:= 9 ~
CJ~z
-< 0
Q)=tI:LO
'" ~......
COd "'"....
u~
:ll::::u
~:~
~~i
-0
'0
..
~~
:5
M
o
;::n;J:
~~
o
.......
M
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
'"
'"
~
1=1
~
.....
~
]-
o
U
4-<
o
I-<
~
:j::;
~
H
I-
o
M
N
-<
9
~
M
o
Or:/)
~~
N
-----
0'\
~
1=1
o
Z
M
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
.....
;:j
o
"0
~
'8
:::E
o
Q
"""
"""
N
-<
Q
......l
~
M
o
~ -<I
~P:::
o
.......
-<
p:::1
i::LI
Z
o
Q
o
s:
::r:
of)
o
o
N
-----
M
-----
o
.......
t<')
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
"0
<.)
~
p:::
>-.
~
;>
I-<
;:j
r:/)
~
~
I-<
f-<
00
.......
o
-<
Q
......l
~
e
<'I
o
~~
Sj~
-----
.......
~
~
i::LI
Z
o
Q
~
1=1
o
Z
<',
o
o
N
-----
r---
0'1
2;
t<')
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
"0
~
.....
oj
~
I-<
U
P.
oj
:::E
o
M
.......
-<
Q
......l
~
co
-<
co
iil
P-<
I
~
o
M
o
~~
~~
o
.......
~
~
i::LI
Z
o
Q
o
s:
::r:
M
o
o
N
-----
\0
-----
o
.......
t<')
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
1=1
,8
.....
oj
'"5
<.)
c:3
U
~
bIl
oj
::1"0
.~ 0
I-< ~
QP:::
~
.......
o
-<
Q
......l
~
M
o
Or:/)
~>
""">->
N
-----
0'\
o
s:
::r:
('<',
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
G\
.....
<.)
oj
p.
a
>-<
<.)
S
oj
I-<
f-<
;f'",
I-< ~
~ ~
>~
tn
.......
o
-<
Q
......l
.~
~
z
M
o
~~
~~
o
.......
~
~
i::LI
Z
o
Q
~
::1
o
Z
t<')
o
o
N
-----
\0
-----
o
.......
M
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
s:
~
';;'
~
P:::
c:3
bIl
~
......l
o
\0
o
Q
9
~
-
-;:!
5)
E
E
o
u
o
Z
<',
o
~-<
~ p:::1
-----
o
-<
p:::1
i::LI
Z
o
Q
~
::1
o
Z
<',
o
o
N
-----
"""
.......
-----
o
<' I
o
o
N
-----
"""
.......
-----
o
t<')
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
s:
~
';;'
~
p:::
~
<.)
3
o
'"
~
p:::
"0
1=1
oj
......l
o
tn
o
Q
Q
......l
~
.....~ Q
~E .t:: 3 ~
E 0,.,,1
,~"@ ~ SS
..s .,.... i::LI
..s g -Bo t:.::
~o:]~
oj 0 r:/)
-B v 0.. (I]
iilB~>-<o
"O<.)~':7"
>=: ::J 0 0,<-,
';:; .l:: ..... '';:; i:2
5~S:'Bi::LI
.... e .g 5 i::LI
o ~ <.) z
~ 5 ,S "0 ""
tnU oj >=:'-'
8;:::45 &~
''fJ.g~....,
8 ::J <Ii ~ I-'<
o 0 oj ::: i::LI
s:: .8 1l - f-<
u >->f3:'~
co'P'B~~z
.8 ~ ,S ::: i:2 ~
~ ,,.... ~ 8 0
<.)"Ogj
5 ~u ~t;~
.... .... '" '-::r: 0
~..8:.s.:!:::f-<u
.... ~ .... ~ ~ ~
E'Bt8~:5,<-,
M
o
~ P:::l
t:::r:/)
.......
.......
<'I
o
o
~ <r:1
~Q
-----
o
P:::j
r:/)
-<I
Q
i::LI
Z
o
Q
i::LI
Z
o
Q
~
1=1
o
Z
~
1=1
o
Z
t<')
o
o
N
-----
r---
-----
.......
.......
t<')
o
o
N
-----
00
-----
o
.......
M
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
M
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
s:
~
';;'
~
P:::
....
~
.....
oj
~
S
o
.....
r:/)
o
.......
o
Q
Q
......l
~
bIl~
;:g-B
.n 0
~ g
.s P..'~
~E~
>-> 'c;; oj
-a ~ ~
o -B 0
"0 >=: U
~ObIl
's "0 .S <+-i
ar~:3rn
l-< ro .~ 00
",co ""N
.,..... ~ N
c: ~ gp \00
/J) O'.,p N
E E .~ .8
~5~bIl
~ ~ OJ.e
w -B ~
>=: 0 ~
.9 ~ ;j b
~ .S ~
o ~ (/).,.......
'6 .8 >->.Q
t'l.) rn '0.. ::::
~ 8 ;}~
0.. ;:t ~ c:
(I]~Oro
>=: ~ >=: 4-<
OJ bIl~~
8'~.g.......
>=: ;> :B """0
-<8e;::.~
~
b
';;
'n
"
-<
1A
'"
u
<'I
o
op:::
~~
~Q
o
p:::
~
Q
i::LI
Z
o
Q
t<')
4-<
o
N
~
~
P-<
~
1=1
o
Z
<'I
o
o
N
-----
\0
.......
-----
o
t<')
o
o
N
-----
"""
N
-----
0'\
s:
~
';;'
~
p:::
~
I-<
,,....
~
s:
~
';;'
~
p:::
<.)
~
p:::
"8
~
oj
p-<
o
N
o
Q
Q
......l
~
0>
t<')
o
Q
Q
......l
~
C') ::E - e ~
0
0 P-< is
C'l 00 .:;:
--- 0 '.0
C'l "
.--< 0 -<
--- 0 1A
.--< "
.--< "1" U
~r--
..... "T
~ 0
'" 0\
..... 0
~I
~
>.0
~ 0
e> M
;=9
u ~
-<
QJ =t:I:
'" <:l)
~ rIl
u~
::':::u
~:~
~~i
-0
u
I-
(\)
Cj
.~
f11
(\)
~ [(j
iJ:: S
] ~
fjlu
(\) 5
t;j tJ
&i7l
~~
,5-0
C')
,..., 0
.. 0
- C'l
~ ---
~ ~
---
0\
=
.::
-
t:l
>--,
f--<
C')
o
Or./)
~>
"1">--,
C'l
---
0\
Il)
~
o
Z
tr,
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
:~
'"
:>
Il)
.....
Vl
o
"1"
.--<
<r;
CI
.....:i
>:r.,
t')
o
---
o
~
,....,
~
Q
t')
o
~~
~~
o
~
~
~
Z
o
CI
Il)
~
o
Z
C')
o
o
C'l
---
\0
---
o
.--<
t')
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
01J
.S
.....
Il)
Il)
::E
u
~
CI
6
"1"
o
<r;
CI
.....:i
>:r.,
C')
o
Or./)
~~
C'l
---
0\
Il)
~
o
Z
C')
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
iJ::
Il)
'S;
Il)
~
f--<
~
U
\0
.--<
o
CI
CI
.....:i
>:r.,
tr,
o
~~
~~
o
......
r./)
>
>--,
~
Z
o
CI
Il)
~
o
Z
t')
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
"d
Il)
.::;
Il)
Cj
Il)
H
~
o
.~
.~
P.
<
o
......
o
<r;
CI
.....:i
>:r.,
'"
5
.+:
'6
5
Cj
aJ
(/)
~
~
t')
s;::
\0
---
o
......
t')
o
~~
~~
o
,....,
~
~
Q
.....:i
o
::q
Il)
~
o
Z
t')
o
o
~
\0
---
o
.--<
t')
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
iJ::
Il)
'S;
Il)
~
01J
~
'8
o
N
C'l
......
o
Q
Q
.....:i
>:r.,
'"
B
'.0
'6
B
Cj
Il)
Il)
'"
C')
o
~CI
~ <r;1
o
......
~I
CI
.....:i
o
::q
Il)
~
o
Z
t')
o
o
C'l
---
0\
C'l
---
0\
tr,
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
iJ::
Il)
'S;
Il)
~
01J
~
'5.
o::l
o
'"
"d
~
.....:i
"1"
,....,
o
CI
CI
.....:i
>:r.,
B
j:;
(\)
~
u
o
Z
t')
o
o~
~ I
t::r./)
,....,
,....,
~I
r./)
~
Z
o
CI
It)
~
o
Z
t')
o
o
C'l
---
r--
---
......
......
t')
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
iJ::
Il)
'S;
Il)
~
C;;
1:1
~
o
H
.~
~
C'l
"1"
o
CI
CI
.....:i
>:r.,
~
Z
t')
o
~~
~~
o
......
~
~
~
Z
o
CI
t')
'+-<
o
t')
Il)
[?J
0..,
Il)
~
o
Z
C')
o
o
C'l
---
\0
---
o
.--<
C')
o
o
C'l
---
"1"
C'l
---
0\
iJ::
(\)
'S;
Il)
~
[)
.....
'"
o::l
::E
H
o
f:
o::l
::q
o
0\
o
CI
CI
.....:i
>:r.,
~I-J"I",,#,#
.".,- ~r:_lI~~,##~_.
~~::::~~\
;~t\,.\_~:
-~,"::'.""':95~
"-..:;P~";';;i"~-s'il
....,~...,:4TE~"t11
Building Fac"c1Ud'Landscape Cc Arden Dittmer 562-4604
10109/2003 Per Section 3-1202.E.2. Foundation plantings shall be provided for 100% of a building facade with
frontage along a street right of way, excluding space necessary for building ingress and egress,
within a minimum five foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm
equivalents) or three palms for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20
square feet of required landscaped area. A minimum of 50% of the area shall contain shrubs with
the remainder to be ground cover.
Landscape
10/09/2003
10/09/2003
10/09/2003
Zoning Condition
1 0/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
-
e
Conditions Associated With
FLD2003-09047
1750 N BELCHER RD
Not Met
Arden Dittmer
562-4604
Per Section 3-1202.E.1 table indicates that there must be 8' from back of curb to back of curb on Not Met
interior islands.
There is an existing plan for the site which will need to be revised to show the changes in parking / Not Met
drive-thru layout and associated landscape changes.
Plant sizes must be per Code Section 3-1202.B. Not Met
Wayne Wells
562-4504
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Revise the "applicant's name" on the application to "BelCal Properties, LLC." Show "BelCal
Properties, LLC" as the property owner.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Based on the building dimensions indicated on Sheet 2 of 11 for the St. Pete Times Distribution
Building (also addressed at 1750 North Belcher Road) and under BCP2003-03528, the distribution
building should be 14,346 square feet, not 14,215 square feet. Revise/advise.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Revise Sheet 1 of 11, based on the distribution building being either 14,346 square feet or 14,215
square feet (see Comment 2 above), under "Zoning Compliance Notes" and "Impact Fee
Calculations" the distribution building from 16,700 square feet.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Revise Sheet 1 of 11 to indicate the parking requirement for the credit union at five spaces per
1,000 square feet (not three spaces per 1,000 square feet).
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Revise Sheet 3 of 11 to indicate that existing driveways on Calumet Street no longer to be used
will be removed, similar to those on Belcher Road (saw-cut & remove existing driveway).
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Complete the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, since BelCal Properties, LLC is the owner.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Revise the responses to the General Applicability and the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project criteria to provide statements that explain how, what, when and where the proposal of
"retail sales (financial services)" meets the criteria, including the deviations listed above at the
start of the letter. Do not repeat back the criteria as the response. In General Applicability criteria
#2, please provide the anticipated improvement value of the proposed credit union (may also
include the anticipated improvement value of all site improvements for the three buildings).
Suggestion is to provide such responses as an attachment to the application, allowing for full
discussion of your responses to the criteria.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Provide the width of all landscape islands.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Unclear of the paved area at the northeast side of the proposed credit union (not shown to be
striped for parking). Also unclear the need for the small landscape island to the west of this paved
area. Advise/revise.
CaseConditons
Print Date: 11/12/2003
1 of 2
Zoning Condition
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
1 0/06/2003
10/06/2003
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
10/19/2003
-
e
FLD2003-09047
1750 N BELCHER RD
Wayne Wells
562-4504
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
The note "car stop (typical)" with its arrow line at the northeast corner of the proposed credit union
is unclear what it is pointing to (Sheet 2 of 11). Advise/revise.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Unclear of the need for sidewalks greater than five feet on the north side of the proposed credit
union and on the east and west sides of the proposed office building. Also unclear as to the need
to concrete the north side of the proposed office building. Advise/revise.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
For three buildings, unclear why only one dumpster is proposed for this site. Advise.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
All utilities, including electric, phone and cable television, must be located underground on-site.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
The interior landscape area provided on Sheet 7 of 11 in the Vehicular Use Are Tabulation is
different than that indicated in the vehicular use area diagram at the top of the page.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Provide the location of outside mechanical equipment for each building and all required screening.
If located on the roof, note such.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Since the sidewalk along Belcher Road is being constructed on the proposed site and not within
the public right-of-way, an easement for such will be required.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Address the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Provide sign package. Show location of proposed freestanding sign age, including proposed
setback from the property line(s), and provide the height, area and color of proposed signage.
Include any proposed attached signage.
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Provide the proposed building heights in terms of feet, in accordance with Code provisions (see
definition of "height, building or structure" for measurement of height).
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
For presentation to the Community Development Board (COB), it would be helpful to have
rendered (colored) site and landscape plans and building elevations (one copy).
10/6/03 - WW Not Met
Provide color samples (paint samples, etc.) of the proposed exterior building materials.
Since this overall site has three proposed buildings, please provide building elevations of the other Not Met
two proposed buildings (St. Pete Times distribution building and the office building). Include
proposed exterior building materials and colors.
Since a criteria for retail sales and services in the IRT District is that it take no access to a major Not Met
arterial street (Belcher Road), is it possible to remove the proposed driveway from Belcher Road?
Advise.
Since all existing structures are being removed as part of the redevelopment of this site and to Not Met
avoid confusion, remove from Sheet 2/11 the existing (ghosted) structures and pavement.
CaseConditons
Print Date: 11/12/2003
2 of 2
ao~~
~ '-I (D ~ ~ ~~
:c:;~003 &;'
c:........~ z !S:
~. tOm C!. t.i
::J-oCO' !!!.
Q'.....O SO
::l..... 0 -<
0. ~ f1 0 !! ~9P
~ -.. ::::!, 0 3 tnm
6.g.3" a
::rQ1w9 i'
o >< (,J::; '" ,...
::l '-1;:0- "
g~g;g ~ tS
3:;: 0. ~ 5i
./::0. ~.
....."? ~ !i
;:;.
III
~ v. (.')
./::0.
"til
~
~~
~lt- k\eiej ttll& (JQVJ~5 .
fI[p[b3 lj([ ~&( 61 . ·
~ ~~ (t0lA? !liur .
~lcico~+' ~ ~(b b~
-1ft Pew a.UbMfIw4lM 0/&/
--- 11 ~ 671lJlfl --u _. .
--- ~ ~ ()(\1fV\ / reuJ Ut-J11-~
Ju ~. k CJ ~~uh W7 io tLJ VY\ 1Ae. (Iff?
fSD
J
~ CPA ~ ~~9 J<]O ~'kd l1i2'triA
~ct - SlL 6[~
cK Pfc ~ --
i1~ /ANx-
~- - t/Y.h<-€. :
WU1 ~.cf ~ ~ M4y-~
(iJlLLcL ck cc ~. cmch (iw {I\
~ wt ~~ I(~~
(;) ~ &v am pvt Serr
-~!~~~ ~~
~' c5
~(~o
;(4."
, \ /
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
~-"
~:r} .
- -
() l~ 0" j() 3 ".r\
DR u i ".j P,~GE._ 40
,il
CITY OF CLlEARV\fATER
DEED OF CONVEYANCE
}
THIS INDENTURE, made the _____6_tb___ day of ___n_____n_J_anllaX+-_____________, A. D. 19IL__, between the CITY OF
. . . . ' UPPER PINELLAS ASSOCIATION
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a mUnIcIpal corpol atlOn, party of the fIrst part, and ___n___n'____nnn___nn_nn___nn_n'_______'___
FOR RETARDED CHILDREN~ a Florida non-profit corporatiofltl C t Pinellas
______________________________________n___________________________________________________, 0 Ie oun y of -----------------------------
and State of ___EJgriQ.~--n------------, party____ of the second part. whoMs e ma iling a,dd rets s iSF 11214 Sr:' 16
yrtle, G leaX'Na -e r, a. 33:J
WITNESSETH, That the party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum or _:.:-_=-_:.l'_E:Q=-_-=-::-___-=-_-:._Dollars and other
good and valuable consideration to it in hand paid by said part+___n_ of the second part, at or before the en sealing and delivery of
these presents, the receipt whereof is h~rebY ackno\'sJ-t?e'Cge ~:SSdFi3nted, bargained; sold, conveyed and confirmed unto the said
parLV------ of the second part, and to _~t?__n________4l&rs and assigns forever, all the following piece, parcel, lot or tract of land,
@,t1t.<lte, lying and being in the County of Pinellas and State of Florida, and described as follows, to-wit:
~UY .
t".>~ ,i.... r::tt
~"'J '_~~ ~
'"8 ~ k~ ~.
+--_~ 0 L':>
~: :t~J ~';~ ~6
:.:~ C.J () ;.1
.if61
.~ f~;:~ .:~; ~-4
(1) ~;~~ ~:: .,L:;
~, ;j ~~~ ~
.~ [-1 '-) G)
~ rc; 'H r-<
...., Ii:l 0 U
'~P-l >-,
r-~ p~ ~~
E-; r:;-:) U
P:1
The East 291. 61 feet of the North 189.98 feet of Lot 12
of Clearwa te r Industrial Park, according to the map or plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 44, page 46 of the Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida, containing 1. 27 acres
M.O.L.
"
Subject to easements and restrictions of record.
L0
~3Tl~TE OF I-LORIDA
DOCUMEf'~l!\,RY,-""W7'_"', 5T A t~ P r A X
=' co I ^ i;TR 0 L L E R (~~:1E~s:1~t~
rc 8, -JAN -7'71 \\~~~~:;~#)i ~ 0 8. I 0
;::10521 ~>Ji/
iJ)
.....:[ ),..
(Y.}
~l:;
v.;;
20
~u
en
In
=
TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining;
and every right, title or interest, legal or equitable, of the said party of the first part of, in and to the same.
its successors t
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said party______ of the second part, ________:aun:ars and assigns, to ____L~____
own proper use, benefit and behoof fdi-ever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its City
Manager, City Clerk, countersigned by its Mayor-Commissioner, and approved as to form and corr~ctnes!} 'by, tts City Attorney, and
its corporate seal to be hereunto attached, the day and year first above written, _ '~ (): V ;"\,, " '
~ ' /7. _.-",,~ \....':. "~: ~, ? \
CITY/0F Cj'fEAl{,!>i~T~P'';--l{~-:.tbHTJ??- ". ,"'",> \,
, V'-;<I,j, 1 -<Jl, ,~--t ". ,,v I
v.,-1 ~' : t J >~ ,t - )
By; ---------~~)~~~~-~-~~~1~~~;~!~-----~-~:~~~:-----
Attest: _i!1~2~~irib~~,~~~:~:..:~~~~~-,j-----,--------
/7 '-' City Clerk , . " ','. ."
{/ ,,'
I ,
j/{" I /"
counter~n),~:, / "
L .,Jf" l /'
oC',,!."; -"<
____ __ _ _ :tt:.~'b$~:j:.-----<i[..~~3i!~t!?r~~-~---n------
Mayor-Commissioner ./j""
I' )Y
Signed, sealed anq delivered in pres\i~e of:
1. U"" ..,(...-,> .' 'i'
\... '/ .,' ,./....: -:-/'"... /1/ /
, .' / .~- / ,J I!.,/,' ,/
____e_ . '-~. Lc.A'-'::'_-.--=~f}-.k:=.J~. --"=~---------..-. ---------..-
~.. ~.. ill )..' .;. // '
, -l/-' ,c/, -i' -j . ^ . - " '"
.-- - .~~--J-- ---J---~~~-~-tJ-U--t--Sn3nJ--
/
/
I,
flrc,,)~""C1
~ "lriI1W'f"C;::..n.onIM
~~;~~j;~~r:r~
Approved; as to form and correctness:
J / i /7
/i ' . --
....... --/ /;' j ;/ \-- /1 ,/./1_ , ,
I ,<---\, /V'- \, /} / \ I I,)) f- 'c l./
'---i--~---,------------------------~-------~-
City Attorney
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
}
JAH 7
2 ll. PH '71
T HEnEBY CEnTIFy, that OIl this n,__.f)_tO" ,__"'_ day oL-_.., J~9))cll':l)~Y_._,_,______. A. D, 191..1 ---, before me personall'y
appeared l..1.e.r:i:.e.tLRJ..,S_tiJ::.rJJ.ccimJ tM.,J3.1:g\"/1l", ' FL )~: ve Lctt H n
respectively City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk and Mayor.Commissioner of the City of Ciearw:1l.8i', 2 municipai ~()rp()rawm existil1t;
under the laws of the State of Florida, to me known to be the individuals and offIcers described in and who executed the foregoing
conveyance to _'Qp..P-'~E_Ej.E ~.!~?: ~_.h_~_~~~_~~_tJ:.?!?:_ !_~E_~~ ~~_~_de_~_ _ ~~~~ ~~_~_e.~:.__c:_~,~?_~~~~__~_?=~_J?_~~~~~m____ ----
_____________c.Qr.p,Qr.a._ti9n~____'n'_'___~____ and severally acknowled,c;ed the ex,~cution thereof to he their free act and deed as such
officers thereunto duly authorized; and that the official seal of said municipal corporation is d.ulY' :.,\Yi':~~'dj,~,j;lereto, and the said convey-
ance is the act and deed of said corporation. ",", ~- -:ft. '''-''.
" " ''''\.-., . . , . , , , - '.) --.
WITNESS my signature and official seal at Clearwater in the County of Pinellaii' allll- Stat,e of -fIori\kt,' 'the day and year last
above written. ~- ,~):' ('- to' . - -~
_Jic:ddCt';nVl"U<LcL .- -...
Not,rry rPubli(,'State'ol Florlda'~ at Large
\- (, ..:
My Commission !\.xjJi'res:" " I '-- '- /
l,Ffl( ':' C ~ \ "',,"" \",...,,.
f':r''f'' t''.'' "J. " I~ii' ,,: ,> \, ~~\;",-. ['! ri':....~
q'qH4I'j,,~,~ \ ~
, '
G-J
I' (': r'! I' 'I;':'
~,J \) -".I I'j '..:
'1
/\ PV
l,,;-")
1/'
~ ,,- \
\.0-, .
u
'1
'\ i
I: .), .)
I .~.
: I'" '1'-."
! ~,I'I JI. ~, t \
f'.....",~
p f'~
!\/~'y l>:, .
,\' D
e
7402278:1-
~~/,..
"
\>/
'; l ? >/.7')
)'7~~/:~/,:- "
(fO
TeY
e
u. k.4136 PAGE1958
CITY
OF CLEARVVATER
!
L,
~
I
DEED Of CONVEYANCE
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
}
TIllS INDENTURE, made the ___11J_l:t___ day of ________:[~_9X1l~:r.Y----------------, A. D. 19_11__, between the CITY OF
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, party of the first part, and UI.?EER_P~NEL.L..8's__AS.sQ.c.lATIDJ:{__
X_Q~_B-_~?;:~_~!2~P--~~~~-:Q~~-~L-~-X-!?-~~-~~-~?~~p'~-~g~--~-~~-p-~; J1 t:Al~~ounty of __J2j.l1~U~~L_____________
and State of ----XJ9)~~-~r~--------------,J1..q,rt.Y..-a- of j;h.e1~cond part, whose mailing address is 2199 Calumet,
\.J. earwater, Ylorl a 33~ j
WITNESSETH, That the party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of.._..._..._~J'.~Il_...~~_~_~':"_~_Dollars and other
good and valuable consideration to it in hand paid by said parLy_______ of the second part, at or before the ensealing and delivery of
these presents, the receipt whereof is her~bY acknof3t1{l;'C'ik'J1~of~anted, bargained, sold, conveyed and confirmed unto the said
party------ of the second part, and to ___].t~________XIW_n::s: and assigns forever, all the following piece, parcel, lot or tract of land,
situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas and State of Florida, and described as follows, to-wit:
Lot 12, Clearwater Industrial Park, according to the map or
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 44, page 46 of the Public
Records of Pinellas C Qunty, Florida, LESS the East 291. 61 feet
of the North 189.98 feet of said Lot 12.
Subject to easements and restrictions of record.
~~,~\ DrJCUMENT!~RY
: \&1:;C-~;;\\' '\ ;~; ,~ ; fl.
"f'1. \ ru i ')'7 t, \ \1 \' _ 'L. .""
r- Ui P.R. 7 \....J '
= nVEKUE 11047 L
TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or appertaining;
every right, title or interest, legal or equitable, of the said party of the first part of, in and to the same.
. successors .
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said part.:ynn__ of the second part, :L.tB_____XiIDxs and assigns, to .!:.'t~________
proper use, benefit and behoof forever.
00:1-
::''1
-'2.
~:J
Zc
~:~ u
and
own
<=
[~:~\~~~~~~&~~:;~;~'; i
C'
~:.: >-
co
-}-
-.....,.
4..::;
:'::0
;':u
L"
r---
'"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has caused tbes:: presents to be executed in its name by its City
Manager, City Clerk, countersigned by its Mayor-Commissioner, and approved as to form and correctness by its City Attorney, and
its corporate seal to be hereunto attached, the day and year first above written.
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this n_11ib.__________ day oL___X~j;J.~i,1_'!1:.y____________ A. D. 19_7..1:__, before me personally
app eared _:e~c:;__ ?J_ _:J? ~ _ __ J:i' J.9. y. <:'tL k1.. ~ 1:.9_",.1'. LM_,-- J? K9_wn..__B_._ _G.L_W_bi:t~h ~_Ml_9J.1._d_a_ Eye r.ett _I-IQug en ~ n ____
respectively City ~Ianagcr, City Attol:ney, City Clerk and l'ilayor-Commissioner of the City of Clearwater, a municipal corporation existinc'
uncler the laws of the State of FlOrida, to me known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the foregoing
conveyance to _____~ Pl)_~!. _ ~~~~f3_~~ ~_~___~ s _~_~~_~~_t_~()!~_ !_~!_ _~~ t~~ _c}~_ ~1_~l1._i!0.l.::~~"-Ln~_!.'_~?~i_~9-__~_c.!~:-J?.E~nL _ __
_______n___s:.g!];:().E?:.'tt()_Yl.L_n___._n_________ and severally acknowlfdged the execution thereof to be their free act and deed ~: ~~;I~
officers thereunto duly authorized; and that the official seal of saie! municipal corporation is (l1Jly '.hffixed. thereto and the said convey.
ance is the act and deed of said eorporation, . ,.,., .", .... ' .
",' ...." " \.../'\,. ..' . ~.
WITNESS my signature and official seal at Cle<.1rwater in the County of l)inell<!i: am). 'S~ate of 'lfI6,'r~d;;";.the day and year last
above written. -
/) ri~/~':"':' -)~ J' ?II, '-, ":\ € p
- ---Is.J.1!/N~'O' (t"c'.:.!'l'~-" 1;'ll{j'J">l{C:'\ ~tat': :.,,~:____L'~_=,,--: .<\., -
(i ' ' ,-' L -.u.;. Flor'lill.r at Large
My COllllllisSiO\~' ]~)rj)i'r"'r .:.- <(.',' ,_
I ",:,' '~~ '. "_"J~\'l",,~.\;i-
!\' 1- . . \l r 1, . \ . ,~ "
I './ Ii,' 1;",:1; ".l,
~_~u n,k,;J t// i I,__,i.
~4 ,/
I.," A>-' I '
,'7 I ,;
CouIltersig~)ed/ /,;.Y'"' ,,/ 1}'
______IL~f~~;~~~f~~(::~~!~~ !~~~~:,?~;?~-~------------
Mayor,Cw:;;\)TIisspner /)<l/
jfix; ,,"~.-,. ,f
,.... ..
Signe.d!, szal" and delivered ',n Pl" 2sgnce O.f:
~ t) 'iI:J!~'
,'=' . / C-/ . ;
;:: ~-~~-~~1}"~c::::.!~.:.~S::-::'-'~ - -we.LL.:.-L:~)!::~!?~.;.~L~---------------
Vp-'t~' .' . /
~ ~-~-t: _~_---. -- -- '~-==__n____n______._
~.". r-:1;;<: .
~Q9~
~~....~;.; ~
N ci <t;
~ p;?-;
t.t::
-<
&J
....:I
C
STATE OF FLORIDA
~!I/!i k ~'/~. ':~' (:[1 f :,.: t".' t
\ /Mr('"
"'r\_u-'l... \ ,) J,,-/j,',,,L..,.
GLfRK CIHCUlf (OJ)({~
rfa 15
r;J OJ fH 97~
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
}
FJ-'l ~ 1 ','1, 1 1'1 '~':
';1',-:_'; ','1" I. -,/"{l r\
, ~ r.,:-. ,.1
,.
J
1~\"
Cil" i.!
, .'
:1 " )} t.,)
Clv;,;
li...,.l.l
.",',;,t,-',.'
) .I
CITY OF ;LEAlnVATER, FLORIDA (
,J<"- .-- "- ( \.
/1 " ,:' ~ -.' !/~ <f "'\
By: _____: 1:1.:~~(;i_~.__t)~_+-J!~~-\.CJ'--__________
r- .) /" / CitY J\Ian;iger ,_~J. ----
,/ / // / /- I _' ~
- . . //.r' ij2/ /<--~i{;;-:: //
Att"" ", ,el_ /'"i;(:il~~!6~.------m.__m--..--
I' .
Approved as to form and eorrectness:
"-. ~';:./ / /; /)
-~-Z}~'::1L-{.-c:1-/2.lt~;~!;~~(~!,~-=-------------
'.i'
.. II '~.,..,
" ,; L"i\_l
e
e
2. Part Lot 17, Clearwater
Industrial Park
(Located on the south side of Calumet
Street, west of Belcher Road)
(<t:J UPARC., Inc.)
Z 88-21 LU P 88-23
Zoning Atlas:
FROM: P/SP (Public/Semi-Public)
TO: IL (Limited Industrial)
Land Use Plan:
FROM: Public/Semi-Public
TO: Industrial
The above property is located on the south side of Calumet Street, west of Belcher Road.
Mr. Mike Robertson, representative of ill UPARC., stated ill UPARC. is in the
process of relocating its operations and the first stage has resulted in a contract for the sale
of a portion of ill UPARC's. property along Calumet
Street. He advised the intended use will not be consistent with the Public/Semi-Public zoning
as offices and warehouse are proposed for the property. After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Mr.
Robertson stated part of the property being sold is where the garden center is located.
Mr. Chris Hughes, representative of ill UPARC., stated the garden center is
already in the process of being relocated.
-
-
Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for a zoning atlas amendment from P/SP
(Public/Semi-Public) to IL (Limited Industrial) and a Land Use Plan amendment from
Public/Semi-Public to Industrial; the proposed use of the property will be in accordance with
the industrial zoning category; the property previously was zoned as Industrial and was
amended during the areawide rezonings to more appropriately reflect. UPARC's. c::>>- use of
the property; and, it will be necessary that a site plan and plat be submitted for development
of the property. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the request for a zoning
atlas amendment from P/SP (Public/Semi-Public) to IL (Limited Industrial) and a Land Use
Plan amendment from Public/Semi-Public to Industrial.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
Motion was made by Mr. Hamilton, seconded by Mr. Ferrell, to recommend approval of the
request for a zoning atlas amendment from P/SP ( Public/Semi-Public) to IL (Limited
Industrial) and a Land Use Plan amendment from Public/Semi-Public to Industrial. Motion
carried unanimously (5 to 0).
.
e
4. Lot 12, (Clearwater Industrial Park)
(". UPARCtJ')
LUP 89-13, Z-89-16
LAND USE PLAN:
FROM: Public/Semi-Public
TO: Industrial
ZONING ATLAS:
FROM: P/SP (Public/Semi-Public)
TO: IL (Limited Industrial)
The above property is located at the southwest corner of the Intersection of Calumet Street and Belcher Road.
Mr. James Leach, Executive Director of. UPARC"', stated. UPARC'" wants to
restore the property to its original zoning. After questioning by Board Members, Mr. Leach advised as follows: At
. UPARC's"''' new location there will
be more floor space and it is nearer to public facilities; and, the subject property is an industrial park and it is not
on a bus line. He stated HUD just gave its conditional commitment on December 28, 1989 for the apartment
complex on Highland.
Mr. Polatty gave the background of the case and submitted, in writing, the staff recommendation.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
Motion was made by Mr. Hamilton, seconded by Mr. Mazur, to recommend approval of the Land Use Plan
amendment from Public/Semi-Public to Industrial and a Zoning Atlas amendment from P/SP (Public/Semi-
Public) to IL (Limited Industrial). Motion carried unanimously (6 to 0).
e
-
Clearwater Industrial Park Deed Restrictions
The City received a request from <:=3::) UPARC. to resolve questions which
have been raised with respect to certain deed restrictions imposed in 1957 on property located in the Clearwater
Industrial Park Subdivision. More specifically, the City has been requested to either release the. UPARC"
property from the covenance and rely on current zoning or to informally waive deed restrictions by letter upon a
showing of compliance with current code requirements. It was stated the only significant difference between the
deed restrictions and current code deal with setbacks.
A question was raised regarding whether or not the Commission could unilaterally remove these restrictions if
some people have previously met them. It was indicated we would need the consent of the owners.
Michael Robertson, representing. UPARC" CS> and a perspective owner, stated
they discovered the deed restrictions after plans had been developed. A concern is in regard to setbacks and
usage and an office is planned for this site.
Concerns were expressed regarding the legality of amending these deed restrictions. Mr. Robertson suggested
the Commission consider a waiver of the restrictions for the one side setback in the interim and allow time to poll
the property owners.
Concerns were expressed regarding the City being responsible for enforcing these deed restrictions and
approving a known violation of the restrictions. Mr. Robertson indicated the same buyer is on contract to buy the
adjacent land and perhaps a unity of title would settle the setback problem. Concern was expressed that more
research was needed. It was indicated if all the property owners agree that there should be no problem.
e
-
The meeting was called to order at 12:15 p.m. for the purpose of discussing the Consistency Program.
Jim Polatty, Planning Director, stated with the Consistency Program there would now be another level or two of
processing for land use plan and zoning changes. He stated the City will have to process some amendments in
order to come into consistency. This will include amendments to land use plan designations, zoning categories,
and the land development code. Issues still to be addressed include transfer of development rights as, currently.
city code allows all density from a wetlands area to be transferred to the upland property, and the PPC proposal
will allow a maximum of one unit per acre. Another issue has to do with minor density/intensity reductions as,
currently, the City uses net units per acre while the County plan will use gross units per acre. There will also be
some slight changes in neighborhood commercial zonings regarding their floor area ratios. It was stated floor
area ratios in the industrial zones will be reduced, but it was not felt that much would be lost although these
figures have not been calculated.
The City Manager indicated it will impact the industrial park and may impact <~) UPARCFA> (Upper Pinellas
Association of Retarded Citizens)
redevelopment.
David Healey, Executive Director of the Pinellas Planning Council, stated there was a choice to leave these
areas as they are until additional commercial is added and to deal with them at that time.
The Planning Director indicated the overall issue has to do with the number of land use plan categories being
instituted with it being felt there will be a loss of control over zoning decisions on the local level. He stated while
the City is adopting the land use plan categories, not all of them will be used inside the City. He stated the
designations are being recognized in order to allow the City to annex properties without having to go through the
land use plan amendment process.
Mr. Healey indicated that in May, 1991, there were 14 issues of disagreement between the Pinellas Planning
Council staff and the City, and that both staffs have worked to address these concerns. He stated the PPC has
members representing all the local governments in the County. Prior to 1987, Pinellas County staff worked for
the PPC, and this has been corrected.
Mr. Polatty indicated the Countywide Planning Agency is the County Commission. Mr. Healey stated a super
majority of the Agency would be needed in order to overturn a PPC decision.
Mr. Healey further indicated the changes being requested are a basis for streamlining and they are being asked
for in order to eliminate some overlaps. In response to a question, he indicated the PPC's countywide plan does
not supersede the local plan; however, they can not conflict.
Mr. Polatty indicated some of the provisions do provide good checks and balances, but the City's position is that
the PPC rules go too far in restricting the cities in their local matters.
-
e
In response to a question regarding the consequences if the City does not change its plan, Mr. Healey indicated
that once the plan is in place, each city must make an affirmative finding of consistency. This will be reviewed
and, if determined not to be consistent, the inconsistencies will be listed and there will be mediation to resolve
these situations. He stated there are no penalties spelled out for non-consistency. In response to a question, he
did indicate that development being halted was one possible consequence of non-consistency.
The City Manager indicated he felt the major impacts for the City of Clearwater would be on the beach, the
downtown area, and at the airpark.
Mr. Polatty, Planning and Development Director, indicated the North Fort Harrison/Myrtle study and the
Downtown Plan zonings are not reflected in the Consistency Program.
In response to a question regarding the differences between net acreage versus gross acreage, Sandy
Glatthorn, Senior Planner, indicated that 10 units per net acre would equate to 9.5 units per gross acre. Scott
Shuford, Planning Manager, indicated the Seville Development is being addressed separately to allow 10 units
per acre.
Mr. Healey indicated that, as distasteful as it may be to have someone else making these decisions, if the
consistency plan works it will have balanced community prerogative with the need to have countywide
consistency.
Mr. Shuford indicated there were two major areas of concern, those being the beach commercial area and
Morton Plant Hospital. Staff is recommending the Pinellas Planning Council revise their regulations to allow a
1.0 FAR. (floor area ratio) for hospitals. The question regarding the beach commercial area is whether or not to
request a revision to the PPC staff's recommendation for a .95 impervious surface ratio.
Mr. Healey indicated this is a component of measuring intensity and that it is an infrastructure issue regarding
drainage, but also addresses aesthetics and economic concerns. He indicated there will be other techniques to
deal with the nonconforming properties on the beach. He indicated PPC staff will take affirmative action to deal
with the hospital's floor area ratio question, and that would be to provide a mechanism for local communities to
deal with this problem. It was indicated this would be a good compromise. In response to a question regarding
on what this mechanism would be based, Mr. Healey indicated it would be based on a locally approved process
that would allow some local latitude based on a process of which both the local government and the ppe are
comfortable.
Mr. Polatty indicated they felt a major issue was that the Pinellas Planning Council should be concerned with
countywide impacts, not local impacts; and the issue of impervious surface ratio was getting close to the zoning
issue of local impact.
There was some sentiment the County should deal with the land use categories and not specific development.
-
e
Mr. Healey stated there were three areas on the beach that were zoned commercial, and there would be local
nonconforming provisions to deal with the existing circumstances.
In response to a question regarding whether or not a hotel which was nonconforming could expand, it was
indicated there would be an ability to do this through the variance process, and that variances would be
legitimate in some cases.
Messrs. Carassas and Savage of the Planning and Zoning Board left the meeting at
-
e
Item #16 - Public Hearing & First Readings, Ordinance 4707-88, 4708-88 - Land Use Plan Amendment from
Public/Semi-Public to Industrial and Rezoning from Public/Semi-Public to Limited Industrial of part of Lot 17,
Clearwater Industrial Park (~ UPARC", Inc.) Z 88-21, LUP 88-23. (PUD)
The Upper Pinellas Association for Retarded Citizens CGII UPARC") presently operates from a facility located
on the W side of Belcher Rd. on the S side of Calumet St. .... UPARC" is proposing to relocate its facility to
the E of Belcher Rd. as part of the Center Foundation project. Part of the existing operation of a nursery and
plant storage has been relocated to property on S.R. 580 E of McMullen-Booth Rd. The subject property is now
surplus to .... UPARC's..l?t> needs and they are proposing to sell it for private
development.
The request for amendment is in anticipation of developing the property with offices and/or light industrial uses.
Commissioner Berfield moved to approve the requested land use plan and zoning amendments on the subject
property. Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 4707-88 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Winner
moved to pass Ordinance 4707- 88 on first reading. Motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Regulski, Winner, Nunamaker and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 4708-88 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Winner
moved to pass Ordinance 4708- 88 on first reading. Motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Berfield, Regulski, Winner, Nunamaker and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
-
,e
ITEM #14 - Public Hearing & First Reading Ordinances #4925-90 & #4926-90 - Amending land use element of
comprehensive plan and rezoning for property located at SW corner of intersection of Calumet St. and Belcher
Rd., Clearwater Industrial Park, Lot 12 (<<J UPARC"') LUP 89-13, Z 89-16) (PLD)
The property is presently developed as an Upper Pinellas Association for Retarded Citizens (.. UPARC"'~)
facility, which will be moving to the new
Center Foundation facility on the east side of Belcher Road. The requested amendments are in anticipation of
the move and the future sale of the subject property.
If approved, the proposed amendment should not have any adverse impact upon public services and facilities
including potable water supplies, wastewater treatment facilities and the adjacent traffic circulation system. The
site does not contain any significant environmental constraints that would preclude its redevelopment.
The request will require approval by the Pinellas Planning Council and the Florida State Department of
Community Affairs.
Commissioner Nunamaker moved to approve the Land Use Plan amendment on the subject property. The
motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #4925-90 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner
Fitzgerald moved to pass Ordinance # 4925-90 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call,
the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Winner, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance #4926-90 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner
Fitzgerald moved to pass Ordinance # 4926-90 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call,
the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Winner, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
-
e
Item #14 - Public Hearing and First Reading Ordinances 4843-89 and 4844-89 - Land Use Plan Amendment to
Industrial and a Zoning Amendment to IL for property (1.54 acres) located on the S side of Calumet St., Wof
Belcher Rd., Clearwater Industrial Park, eastern portion of Lot 17. (National Data Products, Inc.) LUP 89-8, Z
89-10 (PL&D)
The parcel is presently developed with offices and classrooms previously used by <$::) UPARCW/1>. The proposed
Land Use Plan Amendment could
result in the use of an additional 3,350 gallons per day of potable water. An equivalent amount of wastewater
treatment will be required. It is expected a reduction of 1,320 vehicle trips per day would result from this change.
The request is made to permit this property to be included in the site plan of the parcel to the west also owned
by National Data Products, Inc. The present owner proposes no changes to the existing building footprint. A
similar land use and zoning request was made for the parcel directly west of the subject property by"
UPARCW/1>.. prior to its sale to
National Data Products, Inc. The Board of County Commissioners approved that request in March 28, 1989,
subject to the retention of the preservation area. The approved site plan for both sites includes a 50 foot
drainage and utility easement which addresses and protects the County Future Land Use Plan designation of
Preservation and conforms to the Pinellas County Master Drainage Plan.
Commissioner Regulski moved to approve the Land Use Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment on the
subject property. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 4843-89 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Winner
moved to pass Ordinance 4843- 89 on first reading. Motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Winner, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance 4844-89 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Winner
moved to pass Ordinance 4844- 89 on first reading. Motion was duly seconded. Upon roll call the vote was:
"Ayes": Regulski, Winner, Nunamaker, Fitzgerald and Garvey.
"Nays": None.
10: 20 F'INELLAS COLllny PLAt'-l~~ING 727 46,::) 4155
II - __
FAX TRANSMISSION
1'I!'I"'R1fi mJ
PINELLAS COlJNTY
PLANl\TJ:NG DEPAR~rlVIENT
600 CLEVELAND STREE'11, SOl'J'E 750
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755
(727) 464-8200
FAX' (727) 464-820.1 SUNCOJ' 57,0-8200
~To: p-. r\ ($-~_L/C\~_9f~t~ (A (~~=---~_-:-=~
_,~FAX #--r j ---;::::.:=---- Pages: ~(incIuding this cover sheet)
~JFrom: -- l..::----t-y::e.e.~Q,..w _________
\</~~>
-c: . .--:-- c "-1 G 6--='-"'~-a- /'-. \ '" \ \.d ~ Q ~ ,") ) ~ --~
l'ubJect .-".........J.____{.... \.-_S-C':l-B-'--:;""-"'&C'~'9
'Comments: (Please call, if this transmission is unreadable
or missing pages). ----.-_____.______._..______,._
I. ':,>), ~~-X':.-f^\ <:>NL ( c,,- \ \ {~'" ~, ~~ \ h, 1 y'~ \.,~ -----
'. .....J-,Dt~ eJL _h e,,- "~ c\~~ C1..-vc. ~_ yt. ~ U ~ cf
, ~W~ ,..C f~"e;"..-i~~".....,~.,~~;,,,.,(~~~l~,.,.,
'-~.,,' '" ,.'~",.v.~0~....c~t\~:.\r~\(~::'"C\\:y:>vt, .,," ,',' , ' '" '''',', ,
\ '\} C)
-:~~-'---f\:------~. 'k\ ~n- r' r., \ .1
~', ,..~: ".-\y~(\\Lc~\._._______.__..___:LnQ;._.__ .-/\ <; o':.:.___,r~ ~ E2 CLQS-J\._
.-.-..--...---.-...-.-.-..--.~~c-.--..i..ili ___________. .
t':, }'
.~
-..::'?'..-'. .....,.....'.60-~.~...."n;~n.-.-...c~.-----...---._-...-,..-- -f-GY"'V /C ~ ~~~ ~
--~--- . LJ . ~-i9 - I ----\..----1.-....-
.<' .! 0 '
-:.,::':\...-.---.,----...--..7---.--.--...,,-:-i........:..JL:.!:~~,__",::!--~;.:-;---...:.....--,...,. .. ....,. ,nn":-'''-'T""7--- ~
,.,/ '--/') 'j }' ----'::)'.>.',f ll.,.,/JI '! ..~ !'J ~' ..t.. ".._ ..c._'_..... J.,...,....__.._,.,.,.....,....'.'. " '
'm_.~~-'._..""::.:r___'':./.._:;.____~:. ; ',,-. - _ _ _
i 1
\' ~:~ ::.-,---,-,---,_:,_,_~,,~----_..
.---',---,..------.
.
j" ....../
i \ /
~ .".1
~'
"'-'10':':.",:..., .....-, n....... ...,-._.... _.........,_.. ...__....____.___
"
-- :--.
-'-::,::;:...L_,__.__.,..::,:.+..__..._:~~_/_-)~ -" \..'-
'~ 'f':...-,
I' ;' :; ;
':: ('''J(.~,.,
)" __~_~L1.._.._ t
0' ~ (/.'; i \~,_('J
,~',.,.."-,...,,".,;'........,,.,.......'..,~~.....- ,...",.,~..._---""-,,,_..,.. 'w".,." '..,..., ",.."", '"'''_'''_<__''__''V''''''''' ..... "...._.."".__w",._,___~y_....m....
H:\CDR\PCPD.FAX.cdr, PMWs, 4/9/'03,
AUG-29-"2003 10: 21
VIi
'-rl
I
I
l,~
~
'0
z
><;
~
u...
""
..
III
o
~
q
~
....
(
PI t'-lELLAS COUHTY PLqf.ji,j I IJG
e
727 464 4155
P.02/E13
.
May 8, 199!)
COl'!l!l),j,('!doner ChotJr'1\it; l"noved, coccnoed by COIl'J1\lBei,ono~
Greer and carr1ed unanimou~lYI tha~ OrdlnancQ No. 90-32 approv-
ing Cas~ few 90-9 b~ adopted.
1/4e CASe ~cw 90-1,), PROPOSAL lH C~TY OF' CL~^RwM'l!:K '!'o .e':1eND LA,NO I)Sf~
Ol':,SlGNATION ON COUN'l'YWIOE PLAN r!~O)\ pTJ~LrClSEXI-PUBr,!::: iPl$P\ 'rC
r..IGH1' !NPUS'l'RIAL (Ll) RE PROPf:R't'Y LCc,\'r1:0 ON TH~ SOIJ;!fWESl COR~
HEl'. Of '!'Hl: INTeRSECTION OF CALU~..E't STP,E~1' AlIO IlEI.C'HrFl "0,1.0 _
ANRQ.Y..t;.p; O.ROlN~!L~J.Q. 30-32 J\.pqJ'TED _w__
Pursu~nt to legal not1CG publi9hod in chQ Ap~~~ 20,
1990 i051.lf3 of the i'inell""" ~di.tion of ~h.~ l'd1'!'Ipa Tribune as gvi..
~enced by pu~11Bh8r'6 aff1davit filed with tho Clark. publie
hgaring wac held o~ CaA~ ~CW 90-10, a proposal by ~he City ct
Clear\o{atr~r '-6 ctll1end '~hQ l:lnd l,l:ge deoign,;n:.ion on th,,', CO'JntYW.l.dO
Pl..n from pub),ic/!>.(lIll:.-public rp/SPI to li9'ht il'\d\Jet4i,~l ILI) r9
proper~y loc~ted on the so~~hweg~ CDrnet' of the intersection ot
cal~me~ Street dnd BAlcher Road. DQPL~y Cl~~k G. K. W~~t re-
ported that no co~reapOndone~ hae boon r8calv6d; ~nd that ~hG
matter is prDPQ~ly bofore thv Authority to by he~rd.
Counqr Adm.iT1.i..~t.rJ.\tor Fraci !:. ~1;o\.;(q'.l.18 l.ndJ.t:::).'::.\jd UH.lt
the P~f',ella6 Planning Cour.ell (PFe) r'"'lCQlftl'Mlnd.. dpprovell o! ':.h...
propo~al; and that staff concurs with th8 ~PC reeo~~gndatlon.
David H9~ley, Pinell~3 Planning Counc11 ExeCutive 01-
rector. appoared and related t~a: ~he subject ~roPQrty 18 preD-
ently o~cupLed by the Uppo~ Pinell.~ ^6eocLe~1on fOL Retatd~a
Citlzsne IUPAAC) facility ~nd ~G 3ucro~nd8d by 1ndu6t~iJl uSQS:
th~t th8 P?C h~a givon ~hH rBquest ~~r~ful conslclor3~~on duo tc
tho fact tn<lt B@lch~J;' Road if> d@lI~gn.n;.)d <lEi d 9conic nonCOm;\lt;,r-
cial cc~ridcr; th~t property on the ~eat D~de ot 8elcn~r RO.d
for approximately 1.1/2 mile. in this a1'88 ha~ an indugt~Jij)
l,:;nd lOse cl<ltio';'(.Lc4tJ.on: and t~,a~ thenl havu t;;"."n prl?vio'-l~ p.1,lHl
."..mendment:.i ::,:ado(Jigt\"'t~ng I.IPAl=lC prcpe:n.y i"n11\'1()C!icl.~~ly to tllil we.,:t
.'i:J .indu5triel. ~r.;: BtilteC t.hat t.h.f! PPC recol'n.'t\Ol'!Ot: 3ppr0\1,~~ .)f
the pro~osed change with a tU~~hAr or supp~om~nC~l <8~omm~nd~-
~~~n that eh0 Slte b~ Qevolo~ed in Q munnG~ con~~~~~nt ~itn ~n~
--+
181
AUG-29-2003 10:21
P I ~1ELLAS C1JUt-jTY PLAHH I HG
-
-
727 464 4155
P.03/03
11dY 8, :99C
d6uj.CJn~tj.o<\ QIi the COlJntywid~ FutUrfil Land Us.. illoln; .lnd ..:(-
pldinad. that the ~1,;I:po~:n~ ot tht.i llupplemGJH.011 J:ocommenOe.ticJ'\ is
to ensure Chat t~G property will be developed AS an ~nduetrial
site rather. than a cOlllmercial Ol'\e, -'nd that the Cit.y ...!.It !;'~eor.-
cil.a its lar.d U99 pl~n to confopn with the CountY""ido P1Clfl.
No one app~~r.~d in rQijpon9~ to the Cha1~man'a cull fOr
porQon~ in objection.
Com~i6nioner Greer moved, soeo~ded by Co~,lSSion~(
Todd and c&=ried unafti~ously, that Or~lnance No. 90-32 approving
Laao lew 90-10 be adopted.
.
.
..
Upon di~~c~ion of the Chairmun, thAr~ ~eing no
objec~ion, th~ meeting waG adjourned at 10:56 A.n.
Ch,u.l:!t1<ln
ATTeST:
KA~L~EN F. Oe E~ER, CLERK
I;1Y_
oe~uty Clerk
TDTAL F'. m
-
AN ORuiNANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE .. __'
PLAN OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON ~ft E~T\I t:!)
NUMBERS CW 90-7 , CW 90-8 , CW 90-9 , AND CW 90:-10 l""-":~"-""'''-'''''''''-'''-''-''-'\
I .
TRANSMITTED FROM THE PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNiING ._.. I
COUNCIL PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF tHE ',tP n j 2003 i
COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING fOR ...J
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE ORDINA~CE
AND FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
,i ,f"
f'
-
ORDINANCE NO. 90- -32
WHEREAS, proposed amendments to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan,
which is an element of the Countywide Comprehensive Plan of Pinellas County,
Florida, have been presented to the Board of County Commissioners in their
capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearings and advertisements have been accom-
plished as required by Chapter 73-594, Laws of Florida, and as required under
Section 125.66 (5), F.S., as amended; and
WHEREAS. the procedures of the Special Acts and County Charter have been
followed concerning the Pine1las Planning Council and the Countywide Planning
Authority for proposed amendments to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan; and
WHEREAS, a recommendation on the proposed amendment(s) has been received
'--.,
from the Pinellas Planning Council and considered by the Board as the County-
wide Planning Authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Pinellas County, Florida, acting as the Countywide Planning Authority in
regular meeting duly assembled on May 8, 1990, as follows:
Section 1 - Amending the Countywide Future Land Use Plan
The Countywide Future Land Use Plan for Pinellas County adopted in
:~~,~;:; :'.'~,,:':",!
Section 3(a) of Ordinance 89-4 is amended to reflect the changes ad;upted n
accordance with the action described in composite Exhibit
wh i ch ::X'ri'c:l ua~ s
'\~.[:\ ':"~';
"J'"
"A",
Case Numbers CW 90-7, CW 90-8, CW 90-9, and CW 90-10.
Section 2 - Severability
r""
."", .\'" ',.
".,,"
"",;.',)-
11
-
e
If any Section, Subsection, sentence, clause, phrase,. or provision of
this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court
of Competent Jurisdiction, such holding shall not be construed to render the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 3 - Filing of Ordinance; Effective Date
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed wi th the Secretary of
State wi th the Ordinance and Exhi bi t "A" to be filed wi th Clerk of the
Circuit Court. This Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of notice from
the Secretary of State that it has been filed.
12
~
PI'-1:LLAB y1..VI""NG
IAGENDA MEMORANDUMI
) ( AGENDA ITEM:
cr- 'NCIL
( DATE:
March 21, 1990
IV A-2.
)
SUBJ ECT: Case /fCW 90-7
Jurisdiction: Tarpon Springs (Z/LU /f90-1)
Description: Proposed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan; 0.18 acre
From: Medium Density Residential (MD)
To: Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
RECOMMENDATION:
"~ouncil recommend to the Countywide Planning Authod ty that the proposed amend-
m~t to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) be approved.
'"
'""
B AC KG RO liN,D:
Location: No~tJJ side of Spruce Street, 100 feet west of Alternate U.S. Highway
19 (ripellas Avenue).
Purpose:
To recog'l\ize the commercial use of this property and allow for its
improvement>:
Land Use Considerations:
North:
South:
Land Use Plan Cate~ories
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
Medium Density Residentl~l (MD)
Neighborhood Commercial (N~
Medium Density Residential (XP)
Existing Land Use
business and residential
furniture and cabinet factory
(nonconforming)
Mullet Boat Restaurant
commercial storage and loading
(nonconforming)
East:
West:
The subject area is an existing unimpro'l(ed parHng lot located immediately west
of the Mullet Boat Restaurant. The applf~ant' s intent is to improve and land-
scape the parHng lot. The existing us~, is nonconforming, and the City is
requesting a land use designation that would\recognize and permit improvement of
this use.
Impact Considerations: \\
Traffi c - Approval of the proposed amendment woulct',-? ncrease the number of vehi cle
tdps per day on the adjacent traffic cl~culation system by approxi-
mately 380. The existing level of servic (LOS) on this portion of
Alternate U.S. Highway 19 is "E" (unstable t ffic flows with stoppages
from congestions of momentary duration). Th projected year 1995 LOS
is "F" (a forced-flow condition in which the cility acts as storage
for vehicles backing up from a downstream bott eneck). According to
(Backg~nd Continued)
PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: March 21, 1990
The Council recommended approval of the amendment from Medium Residential
to Neighborhood Commercial. (Vote of 10-0)
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: May 8, 1990
The Board acted to approve the Council's recommendation above. (Vote of 4-0)
I
L-
13
~
PINELLAB F?LANN-INC3
[AGENDA M~MO'ANDUMI
C~I.NC'IL
PAG. 2
( SUBJECT:
Case ItCW 90-7
)
BACKGROUND {Cont'd'):
the MPO Year 2010 Long Range Highway Plan, this portion of Alternate
U.S. Highway 19 is planned to be upgraded to a six-lane divided arte-
rial. The projected Year 2010 LOS on Alternate U.S. Highway 19 is LOS
"D" (an unstable traffic flow condition with only tolerable operating
speeds) .
Water Supply/Wastewater Treatment - Approval of this request would decrease de-
mands on potable water supplies and wastewater treatment facilities by
approximately 536 gallons per day. Thi s area is served by the Tarpon
Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 4.0 million
gallons per day and an average daily flow of 2.7 million gallons per
day.
\
A licabl~ Rules/Policies:
The propose amendment is cons i s ten t wi th the followi ng rules of the Pinellas
Planning Coun il regarding proper locations for neighborhood commercial designa-
tions:
\
\\
\
"
,
\
Areas wher~~lanned need has been
local govern nt planning process,
is not likely p occur.
clearly documented, as through the
and where a duplication of services
On the periPher;\of definable neighborhoods or internal to major urban
development projec~.
"-
The proposed amendment is ~onsistent with the following policies of the Pinellas
Planning Council: ~
Provide for a system of neighborhood community and regional business
service districts by faci itating new construction where it is war-
ranted and by rehabili tati existing business centers which are well
located.
Land planning should weigh hea By the established character of pre-
dominantly developed areas anges of use or intensity of develop-
ment is contemplated. \
Related Plannin~ Considerations:
Although approval of this request would ext
commercial land use designation to the west
sistent with the depth of this designation
site.
nd the depth of the neighborhood
f Pinellas Avenue lit is con-
the north and south of this
It should be noted that this section of Pinellas venue designated as Neigh-
borhood Commercial on the Countywide FLUP contain existing uses that would
be more appropriate under another commercial Ian use designation. For
example, there are in ten s i ve commerci al uses such as the furn i ture and
cabinet factory to the south of the site and the r staurant to the east.
The permitted uses under the City's NB (Neighborh od Business) zoning
district appear to be inconsistent with the appropr ate uses under the
Countywide FLUP Neighborhood Commercial category. ~
Thus, there appear to be inconsistencies both between th City's plan and
zoning classifications and the countywide plan classifica ion. The City
will be addressing the plan/zoning category relationship in ts updated land
development regulations, and it would appear than an amendment~o the larger
Neighborhood Commercial countywide plan classification would be in order
based on the City's Tourist-Oriented Commercial plan designat on. It is
recommended these reconciliations be addressed in the course of the overall
countywide consistency program. Given the small size of this plan change,
its use in relationship to an existing use, and the larger area designated
Neighborhood Commercial, it is recommended this plan amendment be approved.
14
~
PI~.eLLAB
~'_~N.NC3
MEMORANDUMI
cru 'NCIL
( DATE:
Karch 21, 1990
IV A-3
)
SUBJECT: Case IfCW 90-8
Jurisdiction: Pinellas County (L,U. 1-1-90)
Description: Proposed amendment to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan; 0.4 acre
From: Kedium Density Residential (MOl
To: General Commercial (GC)
"
REboMMENDATION:
coun~l" recommend to the Countywide Planning Authori ty that the proposed amend-
ment to General Commercial (GCl be approved.
'"
~
'"
BACKGROUND: \
Location:
Southea;'t, corner of the intersection of Haines Road and 54th Avenue
North.
\
Purpose:
To recognize\lln existing commercial use that has been in existence for
several years.\
Land Use Considerations:
\
\
\
\
North:
Land Use Plan Cate~ori~s
General Commercial (GCl \
Existin~ Land Use
motel, restaurant, and two gas
stations
mobile home park
mobile home park
tavern
South:
East:
West:
Medium Density Residential '(MOl
Medium Density Residential (~D)
General Commercial (GCl
.
The subject area contains termite extermination and boat sales businesses, which
have been in existence since 1976. The\existing uses are nonconforming; there-
fore, Pinellas County is requesting a la~'d, use designation that would bring the
existing uses of the site into conformanc~', with the general commercial land use
category.
Impact Considerations:
Traffic - This change from medium density residential to general commercial would
ordinarily increase the number of vehicle trips per day by approxi-
mately 150 on the traffic circulation sy's,tem. Since the subject area
is already developed with commercial use,there should be no actual in-
crease in the number of vehicle trips per day generated as a result of
this amendment. The existing levels of service (LOS) on Haines Road
and 54th Avenue North are "0" (an unstable traffic flow condition wi th
only tolerable operating speeds) and "E" (unst~,ble with stoppages from
congestion of momentary duration), respectively. ,
(Background Continued)
PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: Karch 21, 1990
The Council recommended approval of the amendment from Medium Density Residential
to General Commercial. (Vote of 10-0)
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: Kay 8, 1990
The Board acted to approve the Council's recommendation above. (Vote of 4-0l
15
~
PIN_~LLA6 FI.I..ANNtNe
IAGENDA MEMO'ANDUMI
PAG. 2
COUNCIL -
( SUBJ ECT:
'"
~
Case IICIJ 90-7
)
BACKGROUND (Cont'd.):
the MPO Year 2010 Long Range Highway Plan, this portion of Alternate
U. S. Highway 19 is planned to be upgraded to a six-lane divided arte-
rial. The projected Year 2010 LOS on Alternate U.S. Highway 19 is LOS
"D" (an unstable traffic flow condition with only tolerable operating
speeds) .
Water Supp1y/lJastewater Treatment - Approval of this reguest would decrease de-
mands on potable water supplies and wastewater treatment facilities by
approximately 536 gallons per day. This area is served by the Tarpon
Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 4.0 million
~~ gallons per day and an average daily flow of 2.7 million gallons per
day.
Applicab e Rules/Policies:
The propos"d amendment is consistent with the following rules of the Pinellas
Planning Cou~il regarding proper locations for neighborhood commercial designa-
tions: '''.
Areas where'~ planned need has been clearly documented, as through the
local govern~'ept planning process, and where b. clupllcado" 0I services
is not likely t\ occur.
On the periphery'\{ definable neighborhoods or internal to maj or urban
development project~
'\
The proposed amendment is c~sistent with the following policies of the Pinellas
Planning Council: \
\
Provide for a system of ri~ighborhood community and regional business
service districts by facilitating new construction where it is war-
ranted and by rehabilitating 'oexisting business centers which are well
located. \
Land planning should weigh heav~~ the established character of pre-
dominantly developed areas when cha~es of use or intensity of develop-
ment is contemplated. \
\
\
Related Plannin~ Considerations: \
Although approval of this reguest would extend\the depth of the neighborhood
commercial land use designation to the west of 'Rinellas Avenue, it is con-
sistent with the depth of this designation to t e north and south of this
site.
It should be noted that this section of Pinellas Aven e designated as Neigh-
borhood Commercial on the Countywide FLUP contains eli ting uses that would
be more appropri ate under another commercial land u des igna ti on. For
example, there are intensive commercial uses such as the furniture and
cabinet factory to the south of the site and the restau ant to the east.
The permitted uses under the City's NB (Neighborhood \usiness) zoning
district appear to be inconsistent with the appropriate 'uses under the
Countywide FLUP Neighborhood Commercial category. '\
\
Thus. there appear to be i ncons i s tenci es both between the Ci t~s plan and
zoning classifications and the countywide plan classification. The City
will be addressing the plan/zoning category relationship in its up ted land
development regulations, and it would appear than an amendment to the larger
Neighborhood Commercial countywide plan classification would be in order
based on the City's Tourist-Oriented Commercial plan designation. It is
recommended these reconciliations be addressed in the course of the overall
countywide consistency program. Given the small size of this plan change,
its use in relationship to an existing use, and the larger area designated
Neighborhood Commercial, it is recommended this plan amendment be approved.
16
"W!J
( DATE:
Plr-'ELLAS -1-YIV-NB
IAGENDA MEMORANDUMI
) ( AGENDA ITEM:
cr- 'NCIL
March 21, 1990
IV A-4.
)
~
',-
.'" SUBJ ECT: Case /fCW 90-9
udsdiction:
D cdption:
FrOil\: Suburb
To: \, Publi c
"
Clearwater
Proposed amendment to the
an Low Density Residential
/Semi-Public (P/SP)
Countywide Future Land U~e Plan; 3.7 acres
(LD)
\
RECOMMENQATION:
\
Council recommend to the Countywide Planning Authority that the proposed amend-
ment to Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) be approved.
\
\
'.
BACKGROUND: \
Location: West side of Kc{'ullen-Booth Road, south of Curlew Road and opposite
Msase Drive, "
Purpose:
To allow the parcel tp be used for a proposed new church sanctuary.
Land Use Considerations:
North:
South:
East:
Land Use Plan Cate~ories
Public/Semi-Public (P/SP)
Public/Semi-Public (P/SP)
Residential/Office (R/O) and
Public/Semi-Public (P/SP)
Suburban Low Density Residential (SLD)\
Existin~ Land Use
single-family residence
church
Mease Hospital and the
Northeast Professional Center
single-family residences
West:
\
The subject area is cu"rrently vacant and the prqperty owner proposes to sell the
site to the Holy Tri ni ty Epi scopal Church, who als\Q owns the adj acen t property to
the south. The Holy Trinity Episcopal Church has \, contract to purchase the par-
cel on which it pr9poses to build a church sanctuary \.
, \
\\
Impact Considerat10ns:
Traffi c - The c)lrrent land use des ignati on generates approximately 180 veh i c1e
trips'> per day on the adjacent traffic circulation system. Approval of
the Iproposed amendment would decrease the number \of vehicle trips per
day' by approximately 16. The existing level of se'r,vice (LOS) for this
pi'rt i on of McMullen-Booth Road is" B" (a s table flow 'condi t i on) and Cur-
f'ew Road is "D" (an unstable traffic flow condition with only tolerable
/operating speeds), respectively. The projected Year 1995 LOS on this
portion of McMullen-Booth Road is "e" (a relatively sati~{actory condi-
/' tion with good opera.ting speeds). This portion of McKull~n-Booth Road
is planned to be upgraded to a four-lane enhanced di vided att;eri aI, and
i
/
/
(Background Contin~~d)
PlN,ELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: March 21, 1990
,
lhe Counci 1 recommended approval
(Residential to Public/Semi-Public.
of the amendment
(Vote of 10-0)
from
Suburban Low Density
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: May 8, 1990
The Board acted to approve the Council's recommendation above. (Vote of 4-0)
17
I~J
r- I I ... __ ... ... "'" ... r- ... "'" I ... I ... I I... ___
~ '""" """ . ~ "-'I ...
IAGENDA M~MO&NDUMI
PAG~ 2
( SUBJECT:
Case /fCW 90-8
)
BACKGROUND (Cont'd.):
'''"
\,
"\
~
"
Scheduled intersection improvements at U.S. Highway 19 and 54th Avenue
North, for Fiscal Year 1990/91, will improve LOS along 54th Avenue
North in the vicinity of the subject area from "E" to "D", thus, elimi-
nating the existing deficiency on this facility.
~'
""-"
Water
It should be noted that the Year 2010 levels of service for these roads
are "F" (a forced-flow condi t i on in wh i ch the fad Ii ty ac ts as storage
for veh i cles backi ng up from a downstream bottleneck) and "D" (an un-
" stable traffi c flow condi t i on wi th only tolera,ble opera t i ng speeds),
'respectively. Therefore, since Pinellas Coun~y's adopted level of
~'arvice is "C" for average daily traffic, it is recormnended that the
Met)\~politan Planning Organization (MPO) reevaluate the future traffic
patte'rc,ns and planned improvements for the.se roads as part of the update
of the '\MfO Long Range Highway Plan. '
",
Supply/Wastewat~r Treatment - If approved, the proposed amendment would de-
crease demands on potable water supplies and wastewater treatment
facilities by\approximately 1,190 gallons per day. This area is served
by the St. Peteh~burg Albert Whitted Wastewater Treatment Plant, which
has an average dB:'i,ly flow of 9; 5 !1l.i 1.1 inn gallons per. day and I!. caoad ty
is 12.4 million gallpns per day. -
.,\.,
'\.
Applicable Policy:
The proposed amendment is
Pla~ning Council:
cons is t~t wi th the folIowi ng poli cy of the Pi nelIas
Land planning should weigh hMvily the established character of
predominantly developed areas ~hen changes of use or intensity of
development is contemplated.
Related Planning Considevations: .
The location of this site at the intersection of two major transportation facili-
ties is not an ideaL'location for residential'!ievelopment. In addition, except
for the subject area,and a small section of the mo,pile home park to the south, ex-
isting land uses along Haines Road consist of coin[nerdal development. In Cases
ft8 3 -17 and /f86 -11 (Area 13) Cound 1 approved general' cormnerd al land use des i gna-
tions for two p~cels of land located to the north and northwest of the subject
area, in consigiration of the surrounding land use pattern and activity associ-
ated with Haines Road and 54th Avenue North.
/
"
18
-6.' -- - --~~--~"'---=
1:
~
I~"-"$LLAS ~..AIj N "-~ G CpL1NCIL
IAGENDA MEMORANDUMI
21, 1990 ) (AGENDA ITEM: IV A-5. )
/fCW 90-10
ear-water- (LUP 89-l3)
oposed amendment to the Countywide Futur-e Land Use Plan; 5.0 acr-es
mi-Public (P/SP)
us td al (LI)
ION:
d to the Countywide Planning Authodty that the pr-oposed amend-
dustdal (LI) be appr-oved.
west cor-ner- of the inter-section of Calumet Str-eet and Belcher-
low for- industdal use, in conjunction with the par-cel of land to
est.
r-ations:
Plan Categor-ies Existing Land Use
dustdal (LI) industdal uses
tion (P) and City fir-e station
emi -Publi c (P/SP)
ity Residential (LD) single-family r-esidence
dustdal (LI) industdal uses
pr-esently developed as an Upper- Pinellas Association for- Retar-ded
facility consisting of offices and classr-ooms. UPARC will be
es and wor-kshops to a new faci li ty now under- constr-uction on the
lcher- Road; ther-efor-e. the r-equested amendment is in anticipation
the futur-e sale of the subject pr-oper-ty.
tions:
r-r-ent land use designation on this site gener-ates appr-oximately
hicle tdps per- day on the adjacent tr-affic cir-culation system.
al of this r-equest would decr-ease the number- of vehicle tdps per-
appr-oximately 52. The existing level of ser-vice (LOS) on this
n of Belcher- Road and Her-cules Avenue is LOS liD" (an unstable
c flow condition with only toler-able oper-ating speeds) . The pr-o-
Year- 1995 LOS on this por-tion of Belcher- Road is lIFIl (a for-ced-
condition in which the facili ty acts as stor-age for- vehicles
(Backgr-ound Continued)
NING COUNCIL. ACTION: Mar-ch 21, 1990
ommended appr-oval of the amendment fr-om Public/Semi-Public to
I; and fur-ther- r-ecommended it be developed consistent with the
r-e Land Use Plan designation to which it is pr-oposed to be
of 10-0)
LANNING AUTHORITY ACTION: May 8. 1990
to appr-ove the Council's r-ecommendation above. (Vote of 4-0)
19
- ---~--->~~.....,...-,-----,~.~-.-._,-- -----~.------~ -,-~' --~ .-.--.-, ----~--,---- ---- -
. -
p
( DATE:
Ma17ch
SUBJECT: Case
Judsdiction: Cl
Descr-iption: Pr-
Fr-om: Public/Se
To: Light Ind
RECOMMENDAT
Counc i I recommen
ment to Light In
BACKGROUND:
Location: South
F.oad.
Pur-pose: To al
the 10'
I
Land Use Cons ide
North:
South:
Land Use
Light In
Pr-eser-va
Public/S
Low Dens
Light In
East:
West:
The pr-oper-ty is
Citizens (UPARC)
moving the offic
east side of Be
of the move and
Impact Consider-a
Tr-affic - The cu
710 ve
Appr-ov
cay by
por-tio
tr-aff i
j ec ted
flow
PINEL.LAS PL.AN
The Council r-ec
Light Industda
Countywide Futu
amended. (Vote
COUNTYWIDE P
The Boar-d acted
~
PIN~LLAS ~",AIN'~G
IAGENDA MEMORANDUMI
CO' -NeiL
PAGI! 2
( SUBJECT:
Case IfCW 90-9
)
~ACKGROUND
\
\
"
{Cont'dJ:
the forecasted Year 2010 LOS would be LOS "C". The forecasted Year
2010 level of service on Curlew Road, which is planned to be upgraded
to a six-lane divided arterial, would be at LOS "B".
Water Supply/Wastewater Treatment - Demands on potable water supplies and waste-
water treatment facilities would decrease by 3,220 gallons per day
should the proposed amendment be approved. This area is served by the
Clearwater Northeast Treatment Plant, which has an average daily flow
0[5.0 million gallons per day and a capacity of 8.0 million gallons
per'liay.
Applicable Rule/Policy:
The proposed amerrqrnent is consistent with the Council's rules regarding appropri-
ate uses for the public/semi-public land use category.
"
The proposed amendment is consistent with the following policy of the Pinellas
Planning Council:
Land planning shoald weigh h2il';~ly the e~t!ibli=hed ch'3.rarrer nf pre-
dominantly developed areas when changes of use or intensity of develop-
ment is contemplated.
Related Planning Considerations:
The subject area fronts McKullen-Booth Road, a designated scenic/noncommercial
corridor. Although the rules of the Pinellas Planning Council seek to discourage
other than open space and low density residential uses along the roadways and to
protect their traffic-carrying capacity, the subject area's unique location
adjacent to public/semi-public designations to the north, south, and east should
be considered.
In recent years, Council has approved several requests for public/semi-public
land use designations along the McMullen-Booth Road Corridor for a variety of
uses such as nursing homes. hospital facilities, and churches. More pertinent to
this request is Case ItoA-87-7 adjacent to the south of the subject area, in which
Council approved a public/semi-public land use designation for a church use. In
addi tion to these church uses, the east side of McMullen-Booth Road contains the
Mease Hospital Complex and related medical offices.
The proposed church use is a communi ty service/support facility that in many
municipali ties is provided for in residential classifications, Its location is
well situated with regard to adjoining public/semi-public community facilities.
Approval of the proposed amendment would be consistent with the existing land
uses and land use designations located in the vicinity of the site, as well as
with previous actions of the Council regarding public/semi-public land use desig-
nations in this corridor. To recommend approval of this amendment the Council
should make a finding that it is not inconsistent with the purpose and intent of
the scenic/noncommercial corridor rule.
j
20
-
.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I, KARLEEN F. De BLAKER, Clerk of the Circuit Court and
Ex-officio Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, in and for
the State and County aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and
foregoing is a true and correct copy of an Ordinance adopted by the
Board of County Commissioners of Pinellas County, Florida, on
Mav 8. 1990
relative to:
PINELLAS COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 90-32
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF PINELLAS COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BY ACTION ON CASE NUMBERS CW 90-7, CP 90-8, CT,] gn-q., AND CW 90-10
TRANSMITTED FROM THE PINELLAS COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT
OF THE COUNTYWIDE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING
FOR FILING OF THE ORDINANCE AND FOR AN EFFEC~IVE DATE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official
seal this
11th
day of
May
, 19 90
KARLEEN F. De BLAKER
Clerk of the Circuit Court
and Ex-officio Clerk to the
Board of County Commissioners
By
<
'j
L~/f{~
/J . ~
Deputy Clerk
21
it
e
2.3.3.6 INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION.
2.3.3.6.1 Category/Symbol- Industrial Limited aL).
Purpose - It is the purpose of this category to depict those areas of the County that are now developed,
or appropriate to be developed, in a limited industrial manner; and so as to encourage the reservation and
use of consolidated areas for industrial use in a manner and location consistent with surrounding use,
transportation facilities, and natural resource characteristics.
Use Characteristics - Those uses appropriate to and consistent with this category include:
. Primary Uses - Research! Development; Light Manufacturing/Assembly (Class A) and (Class B);
Wholesale/ Distribution (Class A) and (Class B); Storage/Warehouse (Class A)
and (Class B);
. Secondary Uses -Office; Retail Commercial; Personal Service/Office Support; Commercial!
Business Service; Commercial Recreation; Transient Accommodation;
Institutional; TransportationlUtility; Recreation/Open Space; Transfer/Recycling
Locational Characteristics - This category is generally appropriate to locations with sufficient size to
encourage an industrial park type arrangement with provision for internal service access in locations
suitable for light industrial use with minimal adverse impact on adjoining uses; and served by the arterial
and thoroughfare highway network, as well as mass transit.
Traffic Generation Characteristics - The countywide plan standard for the purpose of calculating typical
traffic impacts relative to a plan amendment for this category shall be 170 trips per day per acre.
DensitvlIntensitv Staridards - Shall include the following:
. Transient Accommodation Use - Shall not exceed forty (40) units per acre.
. All Other Uses - Shall not exceed a floor area ratio (FAR) of .65 nor an impervious surface ratio
(lSR) of .85. The countywide plan standard for the purpose of establishing relative intensity
and potential impacts shall be a FAR of .39 and an ISR of .65.
Other Standards - Shall include the following:
. Industrial; Residential Use - An appropriate buffer shall be provided in and between the Industrial
Limited category and an adj oining Residential classification.
. Acreage Limitations - Institutional; TransportationlUtility; Retail Commercial; Personal
Service/Office Support; CommerciallBusiness Service; Commercial Recreation; Transient
Accommodation Use - Shall not exceed a maximum area of five (5) acres. Any such use, alone
or when added to existing contiguous like use(s), which exceeds this threshold shall require
a plan map amendment which shall include such use and all contiguous like uses.
Countywide Plan Rules
.... "....
.L.-:J.L.
September 30,2001
Pinellas County Property APp.r Information: 01 29 15 16488000 Oii
Page 2 of5
01 / 29 /
15 / 16488 / 000 / 0120
01-0ct-2003 Jil'l Sl'li tt-I, CFA pine lla.s County Property Appraiser 08:56:53
Ownership In forrqa t ion tlon-Residential Prope rty Add ress, Use, and Sales
BELCAL PROPERTIES
C/O KLE ItL MARK S
2040 tiE COACHMAtI RD
CLEARWATER Fl 33756-2614
COl'lparable sales value a.8 Prop A,j,jr: 1750 tl BELCHER RD
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Censu:s Trac t : 267.02
sales frorq 2001 - 2002:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ Il'lp
Plat Inforl'lation 8 /2,003 12,973/ 269 473,700 (U) I
1957 : Book 044 Pgs 046- 10/2,000 1 L 086/ 157 675,000 (Q) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 3 /1, 994 8,602/ 151 575,000 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,971 3,463/ 346 2,700 (U) I
2003 Value EXEtl'lP T Iot~S
Jus t / t',1a.rke t: 650,000 HCif'lestea.d: 0 OwnerShip % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 650,000 Tax Exel'lpt %: .000
Other Exer,p t : 0
Taxable: 650,000 Agricultural: 0
2003 Tax In forrqa t ion Land In forrqa t ion
District: CW ~iec1.l)Jall : Frontage:
Clear'wate r' View:
03 Millage: 23.0851 La.nd Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 14,440.48
1) 384 x 380 4.00 145,920. 0 S
Special Tax . 00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoP'ie:::, 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes lo.lill tie : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
15,005.32 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
l.Ji tflOU t any exep1p t ion:s., Total L a.n d Value: 583,680
2003 taxes will be :
15,005.32
Short Legal CLEARWATER ItlDUSTRIAL PARK PART LOT 12 DESC COM AT tlW
Description COR OF LOT 12 TH E 208FT FOR POB TH COtn E 377. 16FT
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.flus/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 101112003
PineJIas County Property APp.r Information: 01 29 15 16488000 Oii
Page 3 of5
01 / 29 / 15 / 16488 / 000 / 0120
:01
01-Oct-2003 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:56:52
Commercial Card 01 of I Improvement Type: ~arehouse
Property Address: 1750 "BELCHER RD Prop Use: 500 Land Use: 41
Structural Elements
Foundation Sp read /Hono F ooting Heating & Air "one
Floor System Slab on 6r'ade Fixtures 1Z
Exterior Wall Concr'ete Bloc k Bath Tile "one
Height Factor 0 Electric Ave r'age
Party Wall "one Shape Factor Rectangle
Structural Frarqe Hason r'y Pilla r'8:Steel Quality Above Average
Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rig id F r'afil Year Built 1.971
Roof Cover Built Up/Heta 1/6yps E Hec t i ve Age 30
Cabinet & tvlill "one Other Depreciation 0
Floor Finish Concr'ete Fini sh Function Depreciation 10
Interior Finish "one Economic Depreciation 0
Partition Factor 0
Sub Areas
Description Fa.ctor Hrea Description Factor Area
1) Base A r'ea 1. 00 21. 51Z 7) .00 0
2) Canopy .20 1Z5 8) .00 0
3) S al e s Se rvice A r'ea 1. 50 2,100 9) .00 0
4) Canopy .20 320 10) . 00 0
5) .00 0 11) . 00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Conunercial Extra Features
Description o imens ion:::, Price Units 'v'alue RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 10500 1. 00 10,500 0 10,500 999
2) CO"C PAVE 3380SF 2.00 3,380 0 6,760 999
3) FE"C E 1130 8.50 1,130 0 3,840 1.971
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TiJ TA L RECORD VA L U E : 21.100
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][fJ~BJ
http://pao.eo.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/egi -ser3 70= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &e= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p... 10/112003
.
-
~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 16,
2003, beginning at 2:00 p.rn., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue,
Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following Level Two Application requests:
NOTE: All persons wishin2: to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetin2:. Those cases that
are not contested bv the applicant. staff, nei2:hborin2: property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent a2:enda and
approved bv a sin2:le vote at the be2:innin2: of the meetin2:.
1. (cont. from 10/21/03) Robert Hupp & Allen McMullen are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a
reduction in the front (north) setback from 35 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and from 35 ft to 16 ft (to generator pad) along Charles
Avenue, a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 98 spaces (5/1,000 sq ft) to 97 spaces (4.9/1,000 sq ft), an
increase in building height from 30 ft to 38.5 ft, under the provisions of Section 2-1004.C and to vacate 242 feet of Allen
Avenue right of way (Proposed Use: A 9,560 sq ft medical clinic.) at 3080 Allen Avenue., Acker's Sub, Blk 4, Lots 4-7 & 12-
15, part of Lots 8-11. FLD2003-08037
2. Griffin International Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages on a
parcel of land contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residentially zoned property in the Zoning Atlas, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Alcoholic beverage
sales within a 2,100 square-foot tenant space located in an existing shopping center) at 1575 S. Hi2:hland Ave., Sec. 23-29-15,
M&B 34.31. FLD2003-09042
3. G T Leisure Corp. / R02:ers Beach Development (Villa del Sole of Clearwater Beach, LLC) are requesting a flexible
development approval to permit 6 attached dwellings (townhomes) with a reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft
(to building), the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 1 ft (to pool and
decking) and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and Preliminary Plat approval for 6 lots [Proposed Use: Six
attached dwellings (townhomes)] at 181 Bri2:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No.2, Lots 20 & 21 and riparian rights. FLD2003-
09046
4. Island Kev Development, LLC are requesting a flexible development approval for a multi-use dock for the
construction/reconstruction of 11 slips, dock and 4 catwalks with boardwalk along the seawall for a residential condominium
complex, with a reduction of the side (north and south) setbacks from 18 ft to 16 ft (to catwalks) and from 18 ft to zero ft (to
boardwalk) and an increase of the width of the dock from 75 percent of the lot width (135 ft) to 100 percent of the lot width
(180 ft), under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock of 11 slips for Island Key Condominiums) at
692 Bavwav Blvd N., Bayside Sub. No.5, Elk A, Lots 21,22 & 23 and riparian rights. FLD2003-09044
5. BelCal Properties, LLC are requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales (financial services) with
deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street (Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate,
primmy building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services (GTE Federal Credit Union), in
addition to a proposed distribution center and offices) at 1750 N. Belcher Rd., Clearwater Industrial Park, a part of Lot 12.
FLD2003-09047
6. Evervbodv's Tabernacle, Inc. & Homeless Emer2:encv Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to
pemlit a residential shelter of eight unitslbeds in the Commercial District at 1211 North Betty Lane with a reduction of the front
(west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 ft to 17 ft (to stairway ramping) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.B, as an amendment to a previously
approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect (Case Nos. FLD 02-04-09 and FLD 02-04-09 A) [which pennitted a
residential shelter of eight unitslbeds at 1215 N. Betty Lane with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane
from 25 ft to 15 ft (to stairwell) and from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building), a reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft (to
building) and a reduction in the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft (to stairway ramping), under the provisions of Section 2-
704.B] (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 8 unitslbeds) at 1215 & 1211 N. Bettv Ln., Pinebrook Sub. No.2, Blk E, Lots
15 & 16. FLD2003-09048
e
.
7. Homeless Emerl!encv Proiect, Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a residential shelter of 4 beds
with a reduction of the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to
4.46 ft (to pavement), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction of the side (west)
landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.
(Proposed Use: Residential shelter) at 1003 Carlton St., c.E. Jackson's Sub., Blk 3, Lot 11 less rd. FLD2003-09049
8. Moorinl! Capital Fund, LLC (Family Resources, Inc.) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit a
residential shelter (16 beds for youth in crisis) and a social/public service agency in the Institutional District with a reduction of
the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 8.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 9.5 ft (to
pavement), a deviation to allow the residential shelter 900 ft (instead of 600 ft) from a transit line and a deviation to allow a
social/public service agency adjacent to residentially zoned property, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project,
under the provisions of Section 2-1204.A, and a reduction of the landscape buffer along the side (west) property line from 12 ft
to 9.5 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use:
Residential shelter (16 beds) and a social/public service agency) at 1615 Union St., Sec. 02-29-15, M&B 12.05. FLD2003-
09051
9. Elias Anastopoulos is requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction of the
front (south) setback from 15 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions of the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 2 ft (to building) and
from 15 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk), reductions of the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to ramp), from 10 ft to 1 ft (to
building) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to rubber matting), reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and
from 10 ft to 3 ft (to rubber matting), a reduction of required parking from 5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft (38 spaces) to 3.19 spaces
per 1,000 sq ft (23 spaces) and a reduction in the width of the required foundation landscaping adjacent to the building from 5 ft
to 2 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A
7,610 sq-ft retail sales and services building) at 700 S. Gulfview Blvd., Bayside Shores, Blk C, Lots 11 & 12 and Bayside Sub.
No.6 Unit B, Blk E, Lot 13 and 15 ft vac rd on S. FLD2003-09045
10. ABR Plymouth Plaza, Ltd. (Tampa Bay Water/Jerry 1. Maxwell, GM) are requesting a flexible development approval to
permit an office building with an increase of building height from 30 ft to 55 ft and a reduction of the side (east) setback from
20 ft to 10 ft (to pavement), under the provisions of Section 2-1004.F. (Proposed Use: 37,000 sq ft three-story office building)
at 2575 Enterprise Rd., Sec. 30-28-16, M&B 34.11. FLD2003-09053
11. South Gate Park, Inc. (Tree Tops at Druid) are requesting a flexible development approval to permit attached dwellings
with a reduction of the side (west) setback from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), an increase of building height to allow
perimeter parapets an additional 6 ft (from roof deck) and a deviation from the requirement to screen off-street parking from
adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-304.G, and
Preliminary Plat approval for 10 lots [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 units, five per building)] at 2525 Druid Rd., Sec.
18-29-16, M&B 44.41 and Sever Park, Lot 3 less E 200 ft. FLD2003-08038
12. Dean C. & Anita J. Carlev are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to
zero ft as part of a Residential rnfill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Residential deck) at
1601 Sand Kev Estates Ct., The Moorings of Sand Key, Lot 30. FLD2003-09043
13. Michael & Stefanie Markham are requesting an appeal of the decision ofa Level One (Flexible Standard Development) that
approved an application reducing the side (east) setback from 15 ft to 10ft for a two-story addition to an existing single family
dwelling, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-103.B (FLS2003-08038) (Owners: Jeffrev A. &
Ambrvn E. Finstad) at 2959 Eal!le Estates Cir. W., Eagle Estates, Lot 38. APP2003-00003
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning
Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to
any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the
Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify,
present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests.
An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be
recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to
-
.
three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of
time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by
interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100
S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss
any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO P ARTICIP ATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093.
Ad: 11/30/03
FOUNT AINS BA YW A Y INC
BA YW A Y MANAGEMENT INC
3802 S WESTSHORE BLVD
TAMPA FL 33611 - 1002
CALUMET HOLDINGS
2120 CALUMET ST STE 3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 -
CATLIN, HELEN 0 ANNUITY
TRUST
C/O VALDEZ, EVELIO JR
5602 N 50TH ST
TAMPA FL 33610 - 4806
FLORIDA BLOOD SERVICES
INC
PO BOX 22500
ST PETERSBURG, FL 33742-
2500
MINIERI SEMINOLE INC
29656 US HIGHWAY 19 N
CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1529
-
RUTZ, CHARLES J TRE
RUTZ, JANET C TRE
2694 BRA TTLE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33761 -
CROCKETT, ADDISON R
4029 E AMBERWOOD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85282 -
CAPEL PROPERTIES INC
995 MONTE CRISTO BLVD
TIERRA VERDE FL 33715 - 2036
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
SUMMORE ACQUISITION CORP
2121 LOGAN ST
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1312
-
- SIMPSON, BETTY L
MC CRACKEN, JOHN L
2144 CALUMET ST
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1309
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
DISTRIBUTORS INC
330 19TH AVE N STE 210
NASHVILLE TN 37203 - 2129
DEM PARTNERSHIP
2040 NE COACHMAN RD
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614
HUNT, CLARK CONSTR INC
2165 LOGAN ST
CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1322
BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH INC
PO BOX 20
HENDERSON KY 42419 -
BRADY, SHEILA FELDMAN, MARVIN J SUMMORE PLASTICS INC
2141 LOGAN ST FELDMAN, DA VID TRE 2121 LOGAN ST
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1312 2161 LOGAN ST CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1312
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1312
FONTAINE, TYLER G PINELLAS COUNTY PINELLAS COUNTY
1603 SUNSHINE DR 315 COURT ST ATTN: ENGINEERING RlW
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1317 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 315 COURT ST
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5165
DEPCO PUMP CO INC DOUGLAS MACHINES CORP BUETTNER, CHESTER R
POBOX 7714 2101 CALUMET ST KINKEAD, CARL E
CLEARWATERFL 33758 -7714 CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1310 2627 FRISCO DR
CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3823
LOULOURGASPROPLTD KLOPFER, ALFRED H ZARV ALAS ENTERPRISES INC
1700 SUNSHINE DR KRIS, BARBARA 1857 GLENVILLE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1318 2134 SUNNYDALE BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1416
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1274
KLOPFER, ALFRED H KLOPFER, ALFRED H POSER BUSINESS FORMS INC
KRIS, BARBARA KLOPFER, ERICH POBOX 409
2134 SUNNYDALE BLVD 2134 SUNNYDALE BLVD F AIRHOPE AL 36533 - 0409
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1274 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1274
SOURCE RESEARCH INC
2160 SUNNYDALE BLVD
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1203
MATHEWS, ROGER W JR
MATHEWS, JAQUEL YN F
6851 66TH ST
PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - 5037
SNYDER, MELISSA A
PO BOX 16685
CLEARWATER FL 33766 - 6685
CICATELLO, THOMAS F
CICATELLO, THERESA A
2101 SUNSET POINT RD # 1405
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1250
DYS, PEGGY J
2101 SUNSET POINT RD
BLDG 15 UNIT 1502
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1243
DAVIS, ALVIN G
DAVIS, KIMBERLY J
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
APPELT & NALL
1811 N BELCHER RD STE 1-2
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
DOW, M COLLEN
GRAHAM, CHRISTINE L
1222 BUELL CT
JOLIET IL 60435 - 6875
BELCHER POINT ASSOCIATION
INC
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G 3
CLEARWATERFL 33765-
GRAHAM, HAROLD P
GRAHAM, PATRICIA A
1001 BUELL AVE
JOLIETT IL 60435 - 6939
e
MINIERI SEMINOLE INC
29656 US HIGHWAY 19 N
CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1529
MATHEWS, ROGER W JR
MATHEWS, JACQUELYN F
6851 66TH ST
PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - 5037
HELM, MARION H TRE
2101 SUNSET POINT RD # 1403
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1250
VERRIER, URSULA M TRE
2101 SUNSET POINT RD # 1406
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1250
CAMPBELL LAND CO
PO BOX 1661
DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 1661
ABRAHAMSEN, CHARLES E
ABRAHAMSEN, NANCY M
727 16TH AVE NE
ST PETERSBURG FL 33704-
APPELT &NALL
1811 NBELCHERRD STE 1-2
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
SHEP ARD, JEANNE
705 PONCE DE LEON BLVD
BELLEAIR FL 33756-
CHESLOCK, ANTHONY R
CHESLOCK, ALICE L
1831 N BELCHER RD # I-B
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1442
DAVIS, ALVIN G
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
-
- NISK, ALICE H TRE
NISK, RONALD P TRE
2170 SUNNYDALE BLVD STE W
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1212
ANDRE, PATRICIA A
2101 SUNSET POINT RD # 1401
CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1250
WOOD, JACK B
WOOD, DOROTHY M
2101 SUNSET POINT RD # 1404
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1250
CHESNUT, JOYCE B
2101 SUNSET POINT RD # 1501
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1243
YOST, L MARTIN
YOST, ELISABETH A
1431 RIDGETOP WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1733
BELCHER POINT ASSN INC
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 -
APPELT & NALL
1811 N BELCHER RD STE 1-2
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
KASS, LAWRENCE G
KASS, BETTY L
6025 4TH ST N
ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 -
GRAHAM, HAROLD P
GRAHAM, PATRICIA A
1001 BUELL AVE
JOLIET IL 60435 - 6939
BELCHER POINT PROPERTIES
INC
1831 N BELCHER RD # C1
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1442
REYNOLDS, HAROLD C
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
HOUGHTON- WAGMAN PTR
LTD
1219 DARLINGTON OAK CIR NE
ST PETERSBURG FL 33703-
MOORES, BLAKE E
1831 N BELCHER RD # F-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
PRESLEY, JAMES A
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
DAVIS, ALVIN
1831 NBELCHERRD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
BELCHER POINT ASSN INC
1831 N BELCHERRD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
KNIGHT, TIMOTHY J
2248 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
MARCUS, JAMES
MARCUS, STEPHANIE P
2236 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1612
MARTIN, JENNIFER L J
MARTIN, DAVID W
2224 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
BONIFACE, DOUGLAS L
BONIF ACE, JEAN E
2212 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
-
. HOUGHTON-WAGMANPTR
LTD
1219 DARLINGTON OAK CIR NE
ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 -
RSS
7710 ARALIA WAY
LARGO FL 33777-
REYNOLDS, HAROLD C
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
PROSPORT MGMT INC
1831 NBELCHERRD STE G-3
CLEARWATERFL33765 -1417
GRAHAM, HAROLD P
GRAHAM, PATRICIA A
1001 BUELL AVE
JOLIET IL 60435 - 6939
WEYRES, JOSEPH P
WEYRES, SABINE K
2256 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
LULEK, THOMAS F
2244 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
RUBERTO, JAMES E
2232 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
ROESLER,LAWRENCEJ
ROESLER, DEBORAH A
2220 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
BUTLER, FREDERICK J
5900 SHORE BLVD S # 401
GULFPORT FL 33707 - 5933
-
... HOUGHTON-WAGMANPTR
LTD
1219 DARLINGTON OAK CIR NE
ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 -
RSS
7710 ARALIA WAY
LARGO FL 33777-
MARSAR & CO INC
1831 N BELCHER RD # G-1
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
PROSPORT MGMT INC
1831 N BELCHER RD STE G-3
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1417
GRAHAM, HAROLD P
GRAHAM, PATRICIA A
1001 BUELL AVE
JOLIET IL 60435 - 6939
HELPHINSTINE, RICHARD L
HELPHINSTINE, BESSIE
2252 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
LAUZON, DOROTHY
2300 LAKESHORE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33759 -
FOSTER, GEORGE E IV
FOSTER, PAMELA S
2228 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
HUBER, GAIL A
HUBER, LAUREN
2216 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
WICKMAN, CLIFFORD L JR
5900 SHORE BLVD S # 401
ST PETERSBURG FL 33707 - 5933
-- -
BOULES, MICHAEL F COE,JAYL - HEILMANN, FRANCIS J III
BOULES, ANSAF S COE, DEBORAH L 1758 W MANOR AVE
2201 MANOR BLVD N 1762 W MANOR AVE CLEARWATERFL33765 -1610
CLEARWATERFL 33765- CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
HEUSINGER, CHERYL S BROWN, JOSEPH N SHOWER, DONALD R
1754 W MANOR AVE BROWN, DOROTHY L SHOWER, BARBARA A
CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1610 1750 W MANOR AVE 1748 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
SLACK, BARRY R MAXWELL, W ALTER K GRIDER, ANGELA M
SLACK, CHRISTINE R MAXWELL, JERI S GRIDER, JOEL D
1736 W MANOR AVE 1740 W MANOR AVE 1734 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATER FL 33765 -
ABAD, VICTOR G JOHNSON, STEVEN F UNDERWOOD, BARBARA A
ABAD, CLARA D JENKINS, PATTY A 1724 W MANOR AVE
1732 W MANOR AVE 1728 W MANOR AVE CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1610
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1610
HARRIS, SEAN BRONSON, RICHARD A EASTHAM, STEPHEN R
HARRIS, NASHUN BRONSON, DA WN M 1711 WMANORAVE
1716 MANOR AVE W 2200 S LAGOON CIR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1606
TORRE, ERMINDA F TAYLOR, LOIS A V AN SCOYOC, ROBERT
3076 GLENHURST AVE 1721 WMANORAVE V AN SCOYOC, MARIL YNNE
LOS ANGELES CA 90039- CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 1725 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
NGUYEN, MANH V LA MASTRA, JOSEPH S YOUSSEF, NABIL F
PHAM, LE ANH LA MASTRA, MARY YOUSSEF, NADIA Z
1729 W MANOR AVE 1733 W MANOR AVE 1735 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1611
DONEY, ELLA M USSERY, J C THRAP, CHRISTOPHER E JR
1741 WMANORAVE USSERY, CAROLYN R 1749 WMANORAVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 1944 REDBUD WAY CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1611
SEVIERVILLE TN 37876 - 0850
TILLERY, BILLY G WOOD, JAMES E ESTER, STEPHEN F
1751 WMANORDR WOOD, ELIZABETH A ESTER, RENDA K
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 1755 W MANOR AVE 1759 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
MALINOVIC, DRAGAN WALKER, JOSEPH 0 SCHNEIDER, ROLAND H TRE
MALINOVIC, MICA WALKER, BETTY L 1770 RAGLAND AVE
1763 WMANORAVE 2217 MANOR BLVD N CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1614
- e
MAQUET, GORDON L DURAVA,CHARLOTTE - LAWSON, JAMES R
MAQUET, LORETTA 1815 STETSON DR LA WSON, SANDRA K
1762 RAGLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1422 1754 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1635 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
BEACH, CRAIG S DOWNIN, ROBERT R EVANS, ARTHUR C
BEACH, SHERYL L 12000 CREEKBEND DR 1744 RAGLAND AVE
1750 RAGLAND AVE RESTON VA 20194- CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
CLEARWATER FL 33765 -
SISK, CHARLOTTE S CARPENTER, RALPH A SORENSEN, DONNA L
1740 RAGLAND AVE CARPENTER, MARY A 1732 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1635 1736 RAGLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 -
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
CALABRESE, FRANK ANDERSON, ROBERT D DERZEKOS, CHRIS
1728 RAGLAND AVE ANDERSON, ROWENA 1720 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1635 1724 RAGLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
TRUSTEE CO TRE CURRENT OWNER ROSEN, MARK F
119-80-1716 TRUST 2224 LAGOON CIR S ROSEN, SUSAN M
C/O WROBEL INDUSTRIES INC CLEARWATERFL 33765- 1711 RAGLAND AVE
PO BOX 466 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636
DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0466
HOLDEN, FAITH E SCOTTI, VICTORIA SCHMIDT, DONNA L
HOLDEN, BRETT 1721 RAGLAND AVE 1725 RAGLAND AVE
1717 RAGLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636
CORBIN, ROY L HARWOOD, JOHN JEST BRYANT, CHARLES E
CORBIN, DENISE A 1733 RAGLAND AVE BRYANT,ARLAYNED
1729 RAGLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636 1735 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1636 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636
LUENGAS, EV ARISTO JR PUSKAS, CHRISTOPHER ESAMANN, BRADLEY F
LUENGAS, LINDA Y 1745 RAGLAND AVE ESAMANN, STACEYH
1741 RAGLAND AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636 1749 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636 CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1636
SUITERS, TERENCE A JENSEN, ROBERT A EV ANS, ARTHUR C
SUITERS, KELLI J JENSEN, MARTHA I 1759 RAGLAND CT
1751 RAGLAND AVE 1755 RAGLAND CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1638
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1636 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1638
BARRETT, ALFRED CARR, GREGORY S AMEY, DANIEL C JR
1763 RAGLAND CT 1767 RAGLAND AVE AMEY, DIANE E
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1638 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1617 1771 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1617
e .
RUBERTO, MICHAEL A ROSA, PEDRO A MURPHY, DOUGLAS R
RUBERTO, LINDA L ROSA, JEANETTE MURPHY, KAREN J
2239 MANOR BLVD N 2243 MANOR BLVD N 2247 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1615 CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1615 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1615
JEFFORDS, GEORGE F CREEGAN, MICHAEL C MYERS, DAVID S
STOKER, JACQUELINE D CREEGAN, JO ANN 1756 W LAGOON CIR
1764 W LAGOON CIR 1221 PENNY CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 8273
SIMPKINS, ROBERT F JR CHAMBERLAIN, DALE J FRANCE, NANCY D
SIMPKINS, LUANA R CHAMBERLAIN, JODY 3930 N PINE GROVE AVE # 601
1748 W LAGOON CIR 1744 W LAGOON CIR CHICAGO IL 60613-
CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1608 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608
JOHNSON, LARRY D GOMEZ, JOSE R ANG, KIM KEE
JOHNSON, JUDITH A BACHE, KAREN V 1728 W LAGOON CIR
3109 SIL VERBROOK 1732 W LAGOON CIR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608
LAPORTE IN 46350- CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608
MARSCHALL, SHEILA MAST, DONALD T STEGER, WILLIAM B
1724 W LAGOON CIR MAST, BRENDA L STEGER, DONNA J
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608 1720 W LAGOON CIR 1716 LAGOON CIR W
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608
DAVIS, JEFFREY ALBURY, MAXINE F TRE ALBURY, MAXINE F TRE
ZIMMERMAN, ROY 1716 VERDE DR 1716 VERDE DR
1710 WLAGOON CIR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1639 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1639
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1608
FLASS, ALMA M GRA Y, DANA ASHER, JESSE W
1721 E LAGOON CIR GRA Y, ANGEL 1729 E LAGOON CIR
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1602 1725 E LAGOON CIR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1602
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1602
COMBS, LEFF J MANNION, KEVIN L CHALLENER, ROBERT B
COMBS, LESLEY D 1737 E LAGOON CIR MORROW, NELSON W
3250 ALLEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1602 1741 ELAGOONCIR
SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - CLEARWATERFL 33765 - 1602
4803
TROUVILLE, EDWARD J PINELLAS COUNTY COOPER, TIMOTHY L
TROUVILLE, PAMELA A ATTN: ENGINEERING R/W 2241 S LAGOON CIR
2261 S LAGOON CIR 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1642 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165
ANTHONY, HELEN J BAUMGARTNER, DAVID GARABELI, SILVANA
2247 S LAGOON CIR BAUMGARTNER, GAY PO BOX 3254
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607 2233 S LAGOON CIR CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 8254
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607
e e
CRAIG, BETSY P KOPP, STACY L .. SHAW, JOHNR
2225 S LAGOON CIR 2221 S LAGOON CIR SHAW, CATHIE A
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607 2217 S LAGOON CIR
CLEARWATERFL 33765 -1607
WALKER, BRIAN R TUCKER, MARK L SMITH, JAMES W
COMO, HELEN J TUCKER, LISA M SMITH, JANET C
2213 LAGOON CIR S 2201 S LAGOON CIR 1827 GLENVILLE DR
CLEARWATERFL 33765- CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1416
HUNT, JAMES V CONZAMAN, TOULA KATAMAY, THEODOREB
HUNT, BARBARA M 1815 GLENVILLE DR KAT AMA Y, MARIAN L
1821 GLENVILLE DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1416 1809 GLENVILLE DR
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1416 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1416
ROBINSON, DWIGHT K MATTINGLY, RONALD E W ATERKEYN, JOSEPH H JR
ROBINSON, JOAN H MATTINGLY, ELAINE W ATERKEYN, KAREN
1810 ELMHURST DR 1816 ELMHURST DR 1822 ELMHURST DR
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1411 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1411 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1411
V ASSILAKOS, SPYRO SIMON, JANET S WILSON, GARRY W
469 CENTER AVE 2249 VANDERBILT DR WILSON, SUSAN L
WESTWOOD NJ 07675- CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1432 2216 ST CHARLES DR
CLEARWATERFL 33764-
REPETTI, GARY L DUPUY, RICHARD E CENTER, JAMES H TRE
2237 VANDERBILT DR DUPUY, CAROL J 2374 WIND GAP PL
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1432 2231 V ANDERBIL T DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 -
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1432
SALVATION ARMY SMITH, MARVIN NIEUWKOOP, DOROTHY W
PO BOX 8070 SMITH, LOIS J TRE
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8070 204 HILL VIEW ST 1600 N OLD COACHMAN RD #
CPE GIRARDEAU MO 63703 - 521
6328 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1625
GUTSHALL, WILLIAM S RUSSELL, JAMES H Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
GUTSHALL, ALBERTA G RUSSELL, LEONA M 2435 US 19 - Suite 350
1600 N OLD COACHMAN RD # 1600 OLD COACHMAN RD LOT Holiday, FL 34691
522 524
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1650 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1650
11f~;I1T.z;f:D-2?:2:h-::~
'(." If." filjOF lli,<~
\~"_" L-"\~';_J ..,"t"a"<:'::>..
, . ~i) ....~.n::a:r.-Qr~r. ~.I~2",?,
i~-(P'- --...--.........~".!" ,'~-,..~
I 'I '1>-:4~;4'o=..
~()' _ ,'. \ j ,f)~J~:)rJl' \ ~ ~
'~~g' "F; e~'"
~i~t~~::~~'i'~'\~:~
"<', .:.:0~ iJ"?I?'C'I \(\c,,:,"
~/<:?~':::01_g2l~~'~~fJJ .~
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
December 18, 2003
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
2435 U.S. Highway 19, Suite 350
Holiday, FL 34691
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2003-09047 - 1750 North Belcher Road
Dear Mr. Figurski:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On December 16, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
Flexible Development application to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to
allow direct access to a major arterial street (North Belcher Road), to allow the use as a permitted
use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial
area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-
1304.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the
following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive lnfill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1304.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to
development/redevelopment efforts of the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union with hours of
operation ending at 5 :00 pm daily. The applicant shall record a covenant in the public
records restricting the use of this building on the subject property, as contained in this
condition, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union. Any future
change of use ofthis building to a bank shall require the following:
BRIAN j. AUNGST, MAYOR-CO/Il~l1SSI0NER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE ~WO]{-CmlMISSIONER WHITNEY GI{'W, COM,llISSIOi'<ER
F]{;\NK I-lIIJBARD, COMMISSIONER @ BILLJOi'<Sm:, COMWSSIOi\EI\
.A..
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E"lPLOYER"
December 18, 2003
Figurski - Page Two
a. Constmction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left
turn lane of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida Department of
Transportation design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road.
Constmction of this improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank, for the future constmction of a traffic signal
light at the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted
by a Traffic Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a
shared portion of the full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion
shall not exceed 50 percent of the full cost. If, in the event that a traffic signal
light is not warranted based on the Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant.
3. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building
permits for the proposed credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
4. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding
of the lighting by tree canopy; and
5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common
theme including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity. Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet
in height. Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is required for more than one
freestanding sign on either street frontage.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Development approval (December 16, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building pernlit. Time frames do
not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an
extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of
validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time
after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit
application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building pennits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy ofthis letter with you when
applying for any pelTI1its or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the
effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your
case expires on January 1, 2004 (14 days from the date of this Development Order).
December 18, 2003
Figurski - Page Three
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Senior Planner, at 727-
562-4504. You can access zoning infonnation for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Plmming Director
\\MS5cIPDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX1?ending cases\Up for the next CDBIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (JRT) (CIR?-
retail sales)IBelcher N 1750 Development Order. doc
-
~./
KARLEEN F. DE Bl.AKER, CLERK OF COURT
~ ~~~~~_~~~,_~~~~~~__~~7~_~~~=~~~8
6C314727 08-11-2003 10:53:35 PAD
51 DED-BELCAL PROFfRTIES LLC
028934
1":03334750 BK:12973 SPG:0269 EPG:02'll
RECORDING 003 PAGES 1 $15.00
DOC STAMP - DR219 3 $3~315.90
03-334750 RUG- 11-2003 10: 54AM
PINELLRS CO 8K 12973 PG 269
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
J
PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
J. Paul Raymond, Esquire
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
625 Court Street, Suite 200
Post Office Box 1669 (33757)
Clearwater, Florida 33756
TOT At:
CHECK AMI.TENDERED:
CHANGE :
BV (?ad!.-- DEPUTY ClH1<
$3,330.90
$3,330.90
$.00
.3
i f~I~';il~ ._"_,.,";';"","~
f\Gi:.(~1' '# "u."..,,,,:.,:,,,,,:,,,;;,~,,,,,_~,''';'',J:J3
:':j.IG AMT ,,,,,,.,~,,.,,,",,",',_i,j
:I( AMT _.,,,,___,,
~E(r-""-"-'-'7s' ~Ci<':)
)80R2193.=r:zr.::,'.9o
)5
Nl
:EES --'-'"'--'''''''''''''''''
A~rF ~,,,,,,,,,",...,.-_.....,,..,...,,,,.~.
'ie
~grAI m:i~
. . ~ ;;j
WARRANTY DEED
THIS INDENTURE made this 8th day of August,
2003,
by and
between DEM PARTNERSHIP, a Florida General Partnership, Party of
the First Part, whose mailing address is c/o Mark S. Klein, 2040
N.E. Coachman Rd, Clearwater, Florida, and BELCAL PROPERTIES, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company, Party of the Second Part,
whose mailing address is c/o Mark S. Klein, 2040 N.E. Coachman Rd,
Clearwater, Florida.
WIT N E SSE T H:
That the said Party of the First Part, for and in consider-
ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the
said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of
the Second Part, his heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas,
State of Florida, to-wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by
reference.
Subject to 2003 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva-
tions and easements of record.
Parcel I.D. No. 01/29/15/16488/000/0120
And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the
title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
It
.
PINELLRS COUNTY FLR.
OFF .REC.BK 12873 PG 270
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has
hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above writ-
ten.
By: .
/
'J()
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before
me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take
acknowledgments, Mark S. Klein, Yvonne Gubner, and Julia Klein to
me personally known or who has produced
as identification and who did take an oath, and known to me to be
the individual (s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument and each acknowledged before me that (s)he executed the
same for the purposes therein expressed and that they constitute
all of the general partners of DEM PARTNERSHIP.
WITNESS my hand and ofljcial seal at /2~dM..~ . f}!LyJ/cI~, said
County and State, this ,~ day of May, 2003. I
0il;~1~~~L/
My commissio~~pires:
",-:;.nu-', Carol Duncan
f'f';&~'S MY COMMISSION # CC894575 EXPIRES
~::~.kE January 10, 2004
~-:1,i"" "$'" BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANC~ INC.
',,9fl1\\'\
H:\DATA\ATY\JPR\BELCAL\WARRANTY DEED.WPD
.
,-
Exhibit A
PINELLRS COUNTY FLR.
OFF.REC.8K 12973 PG 271
A part of Lot 12, CLEARWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the
plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 44, Page 46, Public Records
of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as
follows:
Commence at the Northwest corner of said Lot 12i thence South
89 degrees 21'49" East (plat bearing and basis of bearings for
this description), along the North boundary of said Lot 12,
208.00 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNINGi thence" South 89 degrees
21'4911 East, continuing along the North boundary of said Lot 12,
377.16 feet; thence South 00 degrees 02'4811 West, along the West
righb-of-way line of Belcher Road, 55.00 feet Westerly of and
parallel to the East boundary of the Southeast one-quarter (1/4)
of Section I, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County,
Florida, being the West boundary of public right-of-way conveyed
to Pinellas County by Quit-Claim Deed recorded November 17, 1976
in O.R. Book 4478, Page 2113, Public Records of pinellas County,
Florida, 379.98 feet; thence North ,89 degrees 21'4911 West, along
the South boundary of said Lot 12, 376.66 feet to a point lying
South 89 degrees 21'49" East of and 200.00 feet from the
Southwest corner of said Lot 12; thence North 00 degrees 01'4211
West, 379.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH an easement for drainage purposes, as created in
an instrument recorded February 23, 1993, in Official Records
Book 8188, page 825/ described as follows:
A part of Lot 12, CLEARWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the
plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 44, page 46, of the Public
Records of pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described
as follows: Begin at the Southwest corner of said Lot 12;
thence North 00 deg. 05'30" West (plat bearing and basis of
bearings for this description) along the West boundary of said
Lot 12, 10.00 feet; thence South 89 deg. 21'4911 East, 200.01 ~
feet; thence South 00 deg. 01'4211 East, 10.00 feet; thence North
89 deg. 21'49" West, along the South boundary of said Lot 12,
200.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
It
-
MACFARLANE FERGUSON & McMuLLEN
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
400 NORTH TAMPA STREET, SUITE 2300
625 COURT STREET
1501 SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE
P.O. aox 1531 (ZIP 33601)
P. O. BOX )669 (ZIP 33757>
LAKELAND, FLORIDA 33803
(863) 680-9908 FAX (863) 683-2849
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
(?2?) 441-8966 FAX (727) 442-8470
(813) 273-4200 FAX(BI3) 273-4396
www.mfmlegal.com
EMAIL info@mfmlegal.com
IN REPLY REFER TO:
Clearwater
September 23, 2003
CITY OF CLEARWATER
STATE OF FLORIDA
CERTIFCATE OF TITLE
The undersigned, J. Paul Raymond, a licensed attorney at law, does hereby certify
that as ofthe date of this certificate that fee simple title to the property described in O.R.
Book 12973, Page 269, Public Records of Pine lIas County, Florida, which legal
description is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof by reference, is
presently vested in BELCAL PROPERTIES, LLC., a Florida limited liability
company.
Executed this 23rd day of September, 2003.
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
//
//
~
By:
J.