FLD2003-09047A
o
'.' Cl Planning Department
(I .. 100 South Myrtle Avenue
" earnrater Clearwater, Florida 33756
=.~ Telephone: 727-562-4567
l,l~. Fax: 727-562-4865
()
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
CASE #: ____________
DATE RECEIVED: ____________
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ______
ATLAS PAGE #: ____________
ZONING DISTRICT: ___________
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ______
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH: _______________________
SOUTH: ______________________
VVEST:________________________
EAST: ________________________
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE L________
* NOTE 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) 0 RIG I N A I
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Inflll Project (Revised 12/30/2004)
- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: ____g T .f:__K~_Q~ r-<iL__c.L~QLLJJ.!li._QIL_______________________________________________________
MAILING ADDRESS: __L!J__~~__p a_!~_ M a_ b ~Y__!f i ..9.b..~~Y_~__~_~ill2~L_!.:.~__)_~_~Q_~____________________________
PHONE NUMBER, ________________ FAX NUMBER, _________~-------
~~ER~OVVNER~: _~_~~~_~e~j~_~~_______________~~
(Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~-1--1~-------
AGENT NAME: --g-~f"-<il~~Lb_~__fj~~!LJ;:.9 k-i--~13-9-l!i--~-~--------------------------_FiAI\jj\J'NG DEPARTMENT-
MAILING ADDRESS: --2.5..lQ-P..e.rrn.iL-.E.la~~_--Ho.li.da.ll-l--..E.L-3.4.6.5.5------____.cJJV 01;.1'" ~^'''A 'A~.e___
"-~~,,,-'K
PHON E N UMBER: ---(~22j__.9.42-=-O_ll3______________ FAX NUMBER: ---L7...2.1.J__.9..4-4=:..3.1.ll___________________
CELL NUMBER: ----________________________________ E-MAIL ADDRESS: -----fLgHJ)L~._'d....._D_.e.t..___________________
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site:-----.LZ_~g__.N.Q_J;:.!JJ_~_~)_~_l:!S?_~__R<.2~ d ______________________________________________
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S-~~--_-l.S!_9A1.__.sW_G..LQ.fi~_q_______________________________________________________________
(if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal)
PARCEL NUMB ER: 0 1 / 2.9J-1..5.jJ).6.2.1.4LO.'O''O'LO-.OlO_____________________________________________________________
PARCEL SIZE: -3.~2B..B--.a-CJ:.~_.s__QJ;:__L43_L2LQ__S..E.____________________________________________________
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): _-12i sg i bu t i on -.fa c i li..~ 0 f f i CL...&L~~d.i tun ~___
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ----------~~-~__9J~.!_9s: h_~Q~________________________________________________________
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
o
o
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ____ NO ___ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents) (lnl~If\I^1
I ,I \ I I .. I I 'i i \. ,
-- .. ;:.
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
0 SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OVVNERSHIP (see
page 6)
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~Ji~[~~Ii[-~~---------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------~Q ~_lbl_V_~]------
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
MAR 3 1 2005
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~~--------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~L1)(C)f_~~~~~llE~_________
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) _ Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
, . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
o Q
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
---~:~~-::".~-------_--------------------------------------------------------------~~~---
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - ~~1t:JI. Jljf~.. ..~
-- -- ------ I~~~D ", ~~-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~1--1~--------
PtANNI~r: ')I=DAOTI\11ENT
en'\l V. ::'Lc~"'VvATt:Q
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
(l
n
'-I
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the
City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption tc
this requirement.
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
ORIGINAL
o At a minimum, the STORMVVATER PLAN shall include the following:
-- Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
--- Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
___ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
--- Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
--- A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
City manual.
--- Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHVVEST FLORIDA VVATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SVVFVVMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SVVFVVMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
-_______ Stormwater plan as noted above is included
-------- Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be
provided.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public VVorks Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application. the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
RECEIVED
MAR 3 1 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
,...,.
U
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
ORIGINAL
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 y, X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a .certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials. including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 y, X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
RECEIVED
MAR 3 1 2005
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City ~m~rQfteCLEARWATER
I.
o 0
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAVVINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
ORIGINAL
o
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y:z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J.
SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
o
All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
shall include the street address (numerals)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
RECEIVEr
o Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o
Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
· VVill degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
· VVill generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
· VVill affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
05
PLANNING DEPARTME~ T
CllV OF CLEARWATER
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a .Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
o Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
-------- Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
________ Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public VVorks Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
dC~C~b1f~~~ClfPI~~lfpB1T UNION
y L~. ~-L--~________________
Si ~ at of r ert owner or repres ntative
~tep e~'o~ter, Vice ~resident, Real Estate
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUN~ OF PINELLAS
Sworn ~ and subscribed beforOS me this ]..!:.<L_ day of
__tIi!.-If___________, A.D. 20____ to me and/or by
-Stg.Qb_~J;L.E.Q.t'Lt~.!'_______, who is personally known has
produced as
identification.
. FREeDMAN
.,.,~~
Dff\.(I EXPIRES: May './2006
l-8OO3-NOTARY Fl NotIIy SIrwtot & 1JorlcIn{j, 1M
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
o
o
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: ~lfjL
GTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION \~ I \
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
1750 North Belcher Road
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Modification to existing Flexible Development Application approved by
Communitv Development Board on December 16, 2003, Case FLD2003-09047.
3. That the undersigned (has/R~fjQ appointed and (does/cw) appoint: Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire.
-
as (ljI;i~their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
GTE ~CREDIT.u
-/ ,c.I A
proPeirty wner Stephen Foster
Vice President, Real Estate
Property Owner
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 3rd day of
Mrlrcn 200') personally appeared Stephen Foster who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and suys that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that ne/she signed. ~~
~ 7??~~
~~y 1'11~ MICHAEL J. FREEDMAN
My Com n~i~'S~oMMISSION 1/ DO 117723 otary Public
"'1' Of l\.~" EXPIRES: May 14, 2006
~ -. 8. Bondina. Inc.
RECEIVED
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlnexible development comprehensive infill application ZOOS. doc
MAR 3 1 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
cnv OF CLEARWATER
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infi" Application 2005- City of Clearwater
o
o
ORIGINAL
B.
Description of Request
Site Location. The 3.288-acre site is located at the southwest comer of North
Belcher Road and Calumet Street. North Belcher Road is a four-lane divided
roadway. The east side of North Belcher Road is residentially developed with
single-family detached dwellings. The west side of North Belcher Road is
developed industrially.
Prior Community Development Board Approval. On December 16, 2003, the
Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed a Flexible Development
application to permit retail sales (financial services) with deviations to allow direct
access to a major arterial street (North Belcher Road), to allow the use as a
permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the use to serve
patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C. The CDB approved the
application. The CDB's bases for approval included:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a
Comprehensive rnfill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1304.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the
General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to
development/redevelopment efforts of the surrounding area.
Condition of Approval to be Considered bv CDB. One of the conditions of
approval required:
That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union
with hours of operation ending at 5:00 pm daily. The applicant shall record
a covenant in the public records restricting the use of the building on the
subject property, as contained in this condition, prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union. Any future change of use of
this building to a bank shall require the following:
a. Construction plans be submitted and approved showing the
installation of a left turn lane of adequate storage length, according to
City and Florida Department of Transportation design standards, on
Calumet Street at North Belcher Road. R~e~~VIEI5S
1
MAR 3 1 2005
PLANNING OEPARTMENT
('ITV 0'" ~i ~ 0 PIIII A fCD
o
~RIGINAL
improvement must be completed pnor to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the
issuance of an Occupational License for the bank, for the future
construction of a traffic signal light at the intersection of North
Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted by a Traffic Signal
Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a shared
portion of the full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared
portion shall not exceed 50 percent of the full cost. If, in the event
that a traffic signal light is not warranted based on the Study, funds
will be refunded to the applicant.
This condition as written was predicated on a traffic study prepared by Florida
Design Consultants, Inc., dated November 20, 2003, and review thereof by staff
and the CDB.
The Reauest. GTE Federal Credit Union requests that the condition requiring
closing by 5:00 p.m., each day be modified to allow closing on Fridays to be
extended to 6:00 p.m. This will allow banking services to be available to
customers after working hours on Fridays. This extended hour service is
customary in the banking business.
Traffic Study. The 2003 Traffic Study has been updated by the traffic engineer.
The conclusion of this updated study states:
Based on the above review, it has been demonstrated that Belcher Road
and Calumet Street will operate at acceptable levels of service and the
Belcher Road at Calumet Street intersection will operate at an acceptable
level of service if the GTE Federal Credit Union is allowed to stay open
until 6:00 PM on Fridays. Because acceptable operation can be maintained
on the adjacent roadways, the GTE Federal Credit Union should be allowed
to remain open on Fridays. RECEIVED
MAR 3 1 2005
Response To Sections D. General Applicability
Criteria and Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Proiect Criteria
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Responses to Sections D. General Applicability Criteria and Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project Criteria were included in the prior application and in light
of the limited nature of this request seem not to be applicable. However, the
2
-
o
~R\G\NAL
Applicant will repeat herein the pertinent portions provided in the prior application
to General Applicability Criteria 4 and 6 as follows:
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The site is designed for ease of traffic flow in and out of the property.
Access will be to Calumet Street and Belcher Road (right in/out only). The
number of curb cuts will be reduced by one. Certain cross access features
exist which will also improve traffic flow. Vehicle trip generation will not
have any significant impact on affected intersections and roadways. The
Level of Service category will remain as is.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects,
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on
adjacent properties.
Twenty- four hour operation will not exist. The addition of one hour to
closing on Fridays will not impact adjacent properties as supported by the
FDC traffic study.
As to Paragraphs E, F, and H of the application, these materials were previously
considered by the CDB. As to Paragraph G regarding Site Plan Submittal
Requirements, the primary sheet of the prior application, as directed by staff, is
included with this application. The information set forth on such site plan remains
the same as when originally approved by the CDB.
RECEIVED
MAR 3 1 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CI1Y OF CLEARWATER
3
I
o
o
..,
.
OR\G\NAL
,.,
.
~
3
TRAFFIC STUDY
II
.
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE
SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF
BELCHER ROAD AND CALUMET STREET
'IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER
r'1
.
,.,
...
fl
.
SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF CLEARWATER
fl
.
PREPARED FOR: GTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
~
RECEIVED
~
PREPARED BY:
MAR 3 1 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITV OF CLEARWATER
..
n
ROY CHAPMAN, P.E.
FL. PE NO. 34438
all
...,
.
FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
3030 STARKEY BOULEVARD
NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34655
Phone: (727) 849-7588
Fax: (727) 848-3648
fl
.
,..,
.
February 15, 2005
,..,
.
..,
IIIlI
..
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION. ....... ........ ..... .... ......... ................ ...... .... ........... ....... .... ..... ....... .... ....... 1
2.0 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK ........................................................................ 1
3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC. ............ ..... ...... ....... ...... ...... ............ ................. ........... ....... ......... 1
3.1 TRIP GENERATION .............. ... .......... .......... ................ ...... ............................... ........ 1
FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION MAP ................................................................ 2
3.2 INTERNAL AND PASS-BY CAPTURE .................................................................... 3
4.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION..... ............ ........... .......... ....... ..... .... .......... .... .................. ........ ...3
5.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC .... ...... .......... ... ... ........... ................ ........... ........ ........ ..................3
TABLE 1. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ............................................................4
TABLE 2. INTERNAL CAPTURE AND PASS-BY TRAFFIC ..............................4
FIGURE 2. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION .......................................................5
TABLE 3. BELCHER ROAD AT CALUMET STREET
INTERSECTION VOLUMES .....................................................................................6
7.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........ ......... ...... ......... ...... ........ .......... ..... ...... ...... ......... ....... ......... 7
7.1 BELCHER ROAD AT CALUMET STREET INTERSECTION ..................... 7
TABLE 4. BELCHER ROAD AT CALUMET STREET UNSIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION OPERATION ............................................................ 7
8.0 LINK ANALYSIS .......... ........... ....... .......... ........ ..... ........ ........ ......... ............. ....... ......... 7
TABLE 5. LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE .................................................................... 7
9.0 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 7
FIGURE 3. TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................................ 8
APPENDIX
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0
2.0
3.0
3.1
o
o
INTRODUCTION
A traffic study was prepared by Florida Design Consultants, Inc., dated November 20, 2003 to
examine potential impacts to the transportation network resulting from the redevelopment of a
parcel of property located in the southwest quadrant of the Belcher Road at Calumet Street
intersection in the City of Clearwater, Florida. That study resulted in approval of the proposed
change in development for the site with the limitation that the credit union with drive-in facilities
be "restricted to closing by 5:00 PM. GTE Federal Credit Union, which is developing the credit
union land use desires to have the hours of operation extend through 6:00 PM on Fridays.
This report has been prepared to examine the operation of the proposed land uses on the
impacted roads for Friday traffic volumes, examining PM peak hour operation from 4:00 PM to
6:00 PM including the extension of hours of operation of the credit union through 6:00 PM.
At the time of the original traffic study the existing general light industrial building located on
this site was proposed for replacement with three smaller structures to include a newspaper
distribution center, a credit union with drive-in windows, and a small office. The following
sections summarize the projected impact of these land use changes on the Friday peak hour
operation from 5:00 to 6:00 PM.
EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK
As indicated in Figure 1, Project Location Map, Belcher Road is oriented in a north-south
direction. Belcher Road is a four lane divided roadway with a left turn lane provided in the
median for turns to westbound Calumet Street. The southbound roadway has two lanes that
provide a through lane and a combined through right turn lane. Calumet Street is a two lane
undivided roadway extending from Belcher Road to Hercules A venue, having "T" intersections
with both Belcher Road and Hercules A venue. A single lane for left and right turns is provided
on Calumet Street approaching Belcher Road. The Belcher Road at Calumet Street intersection is
unsignalized. Signalized intersections in the project vicinity include Belcher Road at N.E.
Coachman Road, Belcher Road at Sunset Point Road, and Calumet Street at Hercules A venue.
The posted speed limit on Belcher Road is 45 miles per hour (MPH) and on Calumet Street is 30
MPH.
PROJECT TRAFFIC
TRIP GENERATION
The proposed land uses include a 12,000 square foot office, a 3,528 square foot credit union with
drive in facilities, and a 16,700 square foot general light industrial building. The number of trips
that would be generated by these land uses has been estimated using information from the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) informational report Trip Generation. Because
limited information is available for credit unions, ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 912, Drive-in
Bank, was used for this proposed building. The GTE Federal Credit Union is developing the
credit union on this site. Their facility will close at 5:00 P.M. every weekday except Friday
when the hours of operation will extend to 6:00 PM. The general light industrial building
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I ~
~
I CI)
UJ
:3
(J
8s fn
~
c
~
0
n7
L~
;;:;
a;
r-1lI
I
0
l..5
N
r--t
..f
I
u
u
SUNSET POINT ROAD
CALUMET STREET
Q
~
<:>
0:::
fn
~
(J
Ld
en
'"
'"
rn
~
~
(;
rJl
..~
2
:c
:c
~ DESCRIPTION,
Q,
o
~
o
W?
I-
DREW
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
PROJEC T No.
699-190
I
~ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.
Il ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENT ALIS TS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS
3030 Starkey Blvd, New Pori Richey FL 34655
Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fox. (727) 848-3648
JMS
Drawings and concepts moy not be used or reproduced without written permission.
DATE,
2/11/05
DRAWN BY,
@Copyright 2005 Florida Design Consultants, Inc.
N
NOT TO
SCALE
STREET
EPN,
101
FIGURE.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2
4.0
5.0
o
o
proposed for this site will be occupied by the St. Petersburg Times and will be used as a
distribution center for their newspaper. Since this is a morning delivery paper, their hours of
operation are from midnight to 7:00 a.m. Therefore, this land use will generate no PM peak hour
trips. No trips for this land use have been estimated during the PM peak hour, but daily traffic
volumes have been estimated.
Table 1 summarizes the trip generation for the proposed land uses. The proposed land uses are
projected to generate 1,313 daily and 211 PM peak hour trips. The proposed project traffic has
been assigned to the highway network.
INTERNAL AND PASS-BY CAPTURE
The mix of land uses proposed for this site may have some of their trips that are generated by
one land use on site going to other land uses on site. This internal capture could occur between
the office and credit union land uses. To be conservative, no subtractions for internal capture
have been made for this analysis.
A number of trips already traveling on the adjacent roads may turn into the site to use the credit
union. These pass-by trips have been recognized by ITE and estimates on the amount of these
trips by land use type are provided in their Trip Generation Handbook dated. March 2001.
According to Table 5.26 provided on Page 71 of that document, approximately 47 percent of the
traffic to Drive-in Banks (ITE LUC 912) comes from pass-by traffic. It is assumed that 47
percent of the trips to the credit union will come from traffic already on Calumet Street or
Belcher Road. The internal capture and pass-by trips are summarized in Table 2. As is
indicated, following the pass-by capture, the project is expected to add 873 daily trips and 120
PM peak hour trips to the highway network. This is an increase of 696 daily and 95 PM peak
hour trips above the current approval.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Trip distribution to this site has been estimated using information from the traffic counts taken
for this project. Based on the existing traffic patterns for traffic entering and exiting Calumet
Street at Belcher Road, the trip distribution for project traffic has been estimated and is shown in
Figure 2.
EXISTING TRAFFIC
Existing traffic volumes at the Belcher Road and Calumet Street intersection were counted from
4:00 to 6:00 P.M. on Friday, February 04, 2005. A copy of the traffic count is provided in the
Appendix. Since the purpose of this study is to review the operation of the road network to
extend the operation to 6:00 PM the time period from 5:00 to 6:00 PM was analyzed. This
count was adjusted to annual average conditions using the appropriate "SF" factor from the
Florida Department of Transportation's (FOOT's) 2003 Peak Season Factor Category Report for
Pinellas Countywide data sheet, see copy in the Appendix. At the time the traffic count was
taken the existing facility on the project site was not open, but some construction activity was
taking place on the project site. The traffic count represents background and some project
related construction traffic. Background and project traffic volumes are shown in Table 3.
-3-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c:
o
~
cu
~
G)
c:
G)
C>
Co
"i:
I-
I
I
.oJ
o
G)
"0'
~
a.
I
"
~
G)
.c
cu
I-
I
I
ro
.....
o
I-
00('1')0..-
..- Q) ..-
..- "I
'-
:J
0-010
Ic..-
~ :J
ro 0
Q)B
a.. :J
20
0..-0('1')
C
:J
o
.0
C
1'--0..-
Q) ..-
..-
1'--00
Q) 0
..-
!....
ro
'C
.....
en
:J
-0
C
o
..-
o
lE
cu
~
I-
>a
.c
.
I/)
I/)
cu
a.
"C
c:
cu
G)
~
:J
...
Co
cu
()
cu
c:
~
G)
.oJ
c:
N
Q)
.c
cu
I-
..-
..-
"I
0..-..-0
..- Q) "I
"I ..-
..-
..-
..-
O..-IOCO
..-..;tco
..-
o
o
..-
001O..;t
0..;t1O
..-
('I')
..-
('I')
0('1')0('1')
..-..;tl'--
('I')..;too
..-
..-
Q)en~en
'-o..co..
:J.c ro'c
0..1-0:11-
ro-c-
() ro ._ ro
c I c
-,-Q),-
ro Q) > Q)
c......- .....
'- x '- x
Q)wOw
C E"'"
o Q)
'-Z
......
Q)
'-
:J
.....
0..
ro
()
>-
.0
I
en
en
ro
a..
-0
Q)
.....
ro
'-
Q)
c
Q)
<9
en
0..
'C
I-
-4-
o
en
0..
'C
.....
'-
:J
o
.c
~
ro
Q)
0..
2
a..
Q)
~
Q)
c
Q)
0)
'0
c
..-
.....
Q)
Q)
.c
C/)
Vi'
~
c
Q)
<9
0..
'C
t:.
-
c
o
10"
o ~
o Q)
No..
-0
0>-
..- ro
~;Q
ro '-
:Jl1..
'- -
.00
Q)Q)
l1.."-
I
Q)
.. Q)
2co
ro-:-:
01-
~~
co CO ('I')
('1')..-..-
Q)..-('I')
(/)...;...;....;
~l1..l1..l1..
Cc-c-c-
-=:JC/)C/)C/)
Q)8008
.~ ~ ~ 1'--_
C/)N -CO
..-('1')..-
W()ONO
I--=:J"-"-"-
--.JI'--Q)..-
03
ro
'C
.....
en
:J
-0
C
.....
.c
0)
::J
ro
'-
Q)
c
Q)
<9
-0
Q)
en
o
0..
o
'-
a..
...
Q)
en
-=:J
-0
C
ro
-.J
-E1:
ro oQ>
0:I-.J
o~ ro
Q) I '-
o Q) Q)
~ o~ cQ)
...... '-
00<9
-0
Q)
en
o
0..
o
'-
a..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I tn
a)
E
:J
I 0
>
c:
0
I ;
0
a)
tn
....
a)
+J
I c:
+J
a)
a)
....
+J
I en
+J
a)
E
:J
I ca
U
+J
ca
I "0
ca
0
c:::
....
I a)
..c:
0
a)
m
I (II')
a)
.c
I ca
l-
n
.
...
c: I/) ~
CD":'::
(,) (,) 0
... ::l 0
CD ... N
0.1-
... 10
c: CD 0
::l'" ---
o C'Cl ~
UC N
...
~ 10 "<t 0 "<t
"<t "<t "<t
0:::
"C
c:
::l ::l
0 ... 0 0 0 0
.0 .l:
... ....
I/)
C'Cl
W
;:: 0> ex:> C\l 0
CD "<t "<t T""" <0
...J
::l 10 N 10
"C ... "<t ..- (\') C\l
c: .c: <0 <0 T""" <0
::l .... ..- T""" T"""
0
.0
.c:
t::
0 ;:: C\l N ....... 0>
Z CD N N ..- C")
...J
...
.l: C") C\l 0 C\l
"'C ~
c: C") (\') ..- "<t
::l 0:::
0
..c
.l:
...
::l ::l
0 ... "<t <0 0 <0
(/) .l: C\l 0 T""" T"""
I- 0> 0> 0)
eo
~ .......
0
a.. I-
0 ~
0 a...
<0 "0 0
I
0 c: 0
0 :J <0
0
10 ~ 0
E .......
~ 0
0 U
L- eo <;:!
- m ....... II)
....... u
c: 10 a> II)
:J 0 -e 0
0 0 0
() N a.. N
o
T"""
.......
a>
a>
.I::.
C/)
W
><
<3
:E
eo
L-
I-
>.
eo
"0
"t:
!:!::.
--
c:
o
:p
eo
...
a>
C-
o
>.
eo
"0
10 "t:
ou.
--- --
00
..- 0>
N'7
0>
""0>
2<0
co-;-:
01-
o
-6-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
7.0
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
7.1 BELCHER ROAD AT CALUMET STREET INTERSECTION
This existing traffic volumes and trips from the proposed project land uses are indicated
in Figure 3 and have been analyzed to determine the expected Level of Service (LOS).
Analysis of this unsignalized intersection has been completed using the Highway
Capacity Software (HCS 2000). The results are summarized in Table 4 and copies of the
print outs from this analysis are provided in the Appendix.
Table 4. Belcher Road at Calumet Street Unsi alized Intersection Operation.
Background Plus
Proposed Project
Traffic
D
32.1
2.21
As can be seen from the above table, the intersection is projected to operate at an
acceptable LOS 0 the savings and loan being open until 6:00 p.m.
~
8.0
LINK ANALYSIS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A review has been made of the link level of service on both Belcher Road and Calumet Street
with the proposed project. The project traffic volumes and projected level of service are
indicated in Table 5. The maximum service volumes for levels of service have been obtained
from the FOOT Quality/Level of Service Manual 2002, see Generalized Peak/Hour Directional
Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas Table 4-7, see copy in the Appendix.
Table 5. Link Level of Service
Road Direction LOSD Existing Proposed Total LOS
Max. Service Volume Traffic Proiect Trips Traffic
Belcher Road NB 1,860 1,612 13 1,625 C
Belcher Road SB 1,860 938 20 958 B
Calumet Street EB 760 92 12 104 C
All road segments worked at acceptable LOS C or better conditions.
9.0 CONCLUSION
Based upon the above review, it has been demonstrated that Belcher Road and Calumet Street
will operate at acceptable levels of service and the Belcher Road at Calumet Street intersection
will operate at an acceptable level of service if the GTE Federal Union is allowed to stay open
until 6:00 PM on Fridays. Because acceptable operation can be maintained on the adjacent
roadways, the GTE Federal Credit Union should be allowed to remain open on Fridays.
:es K:\Be1cher at Calumet\Reports\Traffic Study 2-8-05.doc
,.,
.
-7-
-
I
r U U
N
"
I
Q
NOT TO 0 ~
SCALE r-o.,~ a::
0'-"
~+
'-"to
+0
NOl
~~
N~
vOl
CALUMET STREET j !
60=48+(12) j i 1
44=44+(0) -. r-o.,r-o.,
1'10
~ ~
'-" '-"
+ +
N N
N ~
ffi II to
Ol"
:t: 100.{)
U N
to
ljj ~
en
PROJECTED PM
PEAK HOUR
LEGEND
xx - 2005 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES
.
(XX) - PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC
I
I
DESCRIPTION. TR AFFI C VOLUMES PROJECT No. EPN,
699-190 101
DATE, FIGURE,
~ FL~~. P.!.i!!!:!tg.,'!!~r ~!!~.fNC. 2/11/05
DRAWN BY. 3
3030 Slorkey Blvd. New Pori Richey FL 34655
"- Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fox, (727) 848-3648 JMS
@Copyright 2005 Florida Design Consultants. Inc. Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
u
c
~
ri
~
;n
a.
~
n
...s
N
11
L.~
'"
it
r~
o
~
g
n5
'-l
1]
:0
~
,-
L..~
Q,
~
=>
l.P
I-
I
I 0 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,
I
02/07/2005 08:19
8136598688
o
ADAMS TRAFFIC
PAGE 02
I
A~ TY'affi,o, I ttGt.
P.O. Box 997
I Plant City, FL 33564
Tel:(813) 763-7763 Fax:(813) 659-8688
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
Project No.:
o503~
Turning Movement Count
Field Data Sheet
.z8J05 ~ h-;A~
~Jck Qo~
(',....tv,^,- e- t Sk c:~ t
C\uv~~t~ \ ?~~C...s
~
.r
Count Times:
c..{.. ~fM
N-S Speed Limit: LIS mph
E-W Speed Limit: . 3c mph
CI~
Date:
Major Street:
Direction:
Minor Street:
Direction:
City/County:
Weather:
Phasing:
3 Cycles Measured:
~
\A.,^S' ,~J ( u.d
Intersection Sketch
,CO'1- A~~~ .
~ tt.r C~:"~~~J
r, ~\V~t
. r .
~cc...+
I ~$
I ~r
I
I Co~shvc::..-!l OV\ -0 J ...,
d
0
I 04
'\0
~
I ~
f'l
1212/1217/21211215 1218: 19 8136598688 ADAMS TRAFFIC PAGE 1213
I Qi 0 0
E --01O:il~ Il'l~OJ<OQ) ~ :f6 co 01)
.~i~;o$<OiN ....... 1l'l;2;'''- 'l:S N l:::
::J ....... <0 <0 I"'" N ...... .....
n; 'N 1.0 N
I Om :s ;~ 0
001l(V)l() co
....00 co
Q)l()O c::i
.cOC::!
00
Q)O~ ;g"~~~~'Si ~ ~ ~ ~'(1j 18 1.0 :g ..- (0 ~g <100
I .L;lON.... ....
.. . . . . . . M .~ ..- M ..... c-:lc-:l
~ ..- ..... .- I'-:
Q) (I) cU ci.. ci. c::i 0
E"roo c.. c..
I'lIOOZ <: .<:
I zOt::q,)
cU (I) I'll Ol
==~.....m
LL.CI)U)a.. :1- lJ:m......OlT"""CD <IOno..,.1.O .-OJ..... I- Z ..-oa:> Ol .-0 01
w .Q>I ..........~ ..- ..- .- ~ 0) . . UJ .t1I tOu-j....... .- (0'
W ,0:: . a:> .... W ~ IE)
~ 1.0 It)
!g: 'g' 0::."
~c:
I .(j) BI ' (j)=>
II- I- ~.
UJ (Il' I , W (Il'
I::E llll 2'0 0 000 00000 000 .~~ 2 000 0 00 0
:Jw'.c 60 '3 ~ 6 0
~ f-
.<( :<3
I ,U
~Im;: ~ ......~ to (0 01 lD.OI U'l.-a:> 'ii OCtO :E~ 00 0>
T""" ... .tIIlif OJ . . U'lLri'- ~1O<fi~"-
...J ... - ...J
1.0 'q' a. a. '<to.
I ~ g 0
M
;g ~ ;.;
0
(1) :~I~"-'-lQ;<D
E OJ 10 MO.,.... n ....... 'lii <'? 0> 0> ,.... M 01 .....
",. IO'-ON ~~~~:g Ol g '!:S. a:> <0 ~~ <10 ~~
I f- ~ (")....,.v~ ;;; ..... (0 v (0
, .... ..- 0 0-
::l Q.,J 'ci. 0
c.. 9;
31 '<: <:
U
E.
I~ ~ .gJo 0 0 0:0 o 0 0 OiO c~q .- oqo 0 00 0
. oS:
~Q '.- : 00 0 0> 0 0
III <( ;~ c( a:
<.) cpO"O 101:l
.,J :r:o::S :C( 5
c:: '10:: 0, 0::.8
I~ ~,w~: . W..c:
~ U ::t: 1:: 2101 ~ cD <")'2 Ll)~O(Oli'l 01<0 to ::c 1::'2 OlOlE) I{) $: 10
:.c'~~'..c:~ 001 (0 00l'~ '<t . . U~..c: ~aj~ <D (0
..,. M v ('); ..-tOO> u:J f- v ..,.
0 ~Iw I~ 'q' '<t,..... - ",,0>Ll) ....0) .....01
~ ....CO aJ
I'~ Ql
en
c. l'til ....... ....... M 10 N
<Il
</) ~""'(')'q'N :J:"':<I:! !l (')'q''<I' ..,. ~~~~..,.
:J (1) ..- N N . ::E
I- III -'i .N ....0 .....
a. Q. a. a.
~. ! ! I 0 0 0
I 0 M 0
:g :.:. .n
c: 0 0
'C . , , ,
0- I~'~~~~!~ 0..,........ <D~""'" l3 Cl:! ~ ;:t; 0 0.0 ll; 0(0
UJ' N ~ ~ ~.~ ....... N:8 .......00
0.. f-NNNNOI '" I{) 01 N 01 NOJ
=> .... c-:l f- ci 0
,., e g; &
I C!> :< . <:
.
I
I IZ OJ 0 0 N'T"' 01....... OJ Oll") vO)~ :C' to..-O) 0) I")'q' 0)
o '.2' ............'<t \"} ..... . . 0 C> l'? . \"} .
~ -g cr. l'?- <( .- ..,. M
o-gCl::
0:: ;;J. O:::J
,0::.81 0:::0
w..c! w~ -
I n :5' 2:CO.... ~ N...... ':I: - . '0
-- ....... en ............ ....-'<t U 5'2 <001..... q; .,. lD ~
...J ~.~!~ ~ N Ni~ ~ N N ~!Si <<;:g;:r; ~~~ N -
uj"'c N oX OI~
.w - .... m
,[0 IJl III
'5 a.
I VI , .... ::a
~ooooo 00000 000 ~ III 000 :!:o a.
j!l 60 ....o..~ c:l ll')::a0~::E0
~ ...J. '0. a. ~a.. a.
.f: ~o :5 ll"lo ~
a... a..<") 00
I -.:: '4 .. .{) 2.n 10
C1l :.r; ~ 0 ::Eo 0
- '0
~ ~I~ ::a :::'i: ::a:E ~::r;~:lin; 19~;ie rf.26mt:(U5-E~5 o.tidl~ 'cIJ'-
-- a. a. a. a.'o a. a. a.. >(5 O..c:- .- :f .- E 8 E ti - t) o eq~s E~
I1l '';;'8 U) 0 1011- 01{)0 I{):~ l-u2 1-.0.. u';!.....2 1II.c..2 1'0 ~~.:!.....c..21l1
(V)~ l.!!l -.:. ~~: O-M'q' -00.0 ~'g ~ ~ ~ ~ LL. ,21~ LL (! l5.~ ~ .Qlg lL.
I umO(\) ~(I) ~ c; c; ~ .n.n.nu-; c 0.1- (1)1. - Q) .:.:: ~ oX E~ ::c ~
lE I'- .. J!! 0000 ~<( ~- 8m m
" E~ "a.. Q. 0;:... ,r
~~.?;-o e :g &t1Jl
/-("}c.. ...
m:J'- ..... ::)
Ill........ 0 ~ 5 0
I E'-"O- 0 :t:
11l~~~ .:t: oX
.>0: m
" co .- 3: Jll <Il
q;: __ 0 a.. a.
I
02/07/2005
I
-
C1)
E
:J
~(O
""(")1,()
"'00
C1)IOO
tlOt::!
-O..r
C1)O_
.cON......
I
C1) C1) C1)
EUiiJo
l\l8oZ
Z t:9t
~~S iU'
LL.CI)Q.la.
I
I
I
I
I
I~
8
I)
~
~
I,r
:::J
I-
I
I
I
I
I
CIl
E1
4)
c
c::
~
Q)
~
(0
('I)~"'"
u<oum
IE..... ,-~
~ ~ ~()
1-~5L:
CIlr-O~
E-U-
~~~m
co.t:!>
_U;>
I
I
1
.
08:19
:c5lt'oJ..-r-...mj<>>
I cs ',.... N 't- l()
......,
'I
'5
I
I .1. i
I~ .... 0 ..- 0 N
I'"":! i
I~
1 Ii.
'18 I~"" 0 ..- o(~
0::'0
t; 31 ;
It- 01
W ~ ~ :
I~ rolc'oooo'o
:;)w,::
.;;)! ,
I() ;
I
, ,
;~loOOO!O
I
, .
;~I~IOQ)Niln
'0 .N
'~ :
! ~ .
I i
oil 1 I.. '
~I'~ .I'~o 0 0 oio
410"0 ,
>o::c
>.: is I
>10:: .0' 1
row.c' 1
i: 5 61 cl'lD ,.... to t'oJ'r'j
I ..J Z = IN
ll~ If- !
0.. i I
~ 115,:..- .... 0 0 'N
e -' 1
(:)j i
1 .
, !
I' ,. 1
- '<t M to I'- 'N
.~.... r'j
1-'-' .
i'~ i
!~ '
I
I I! !
. ..:c'o N 0 ..- M
I~'UI~ i
Oc .
~:::> I
ffi ~I I 1
IG gle'..,..... <0 <oim
'...J~~i.... t'oJ
I~ ! : I
I l!l!o 0 0 010
. I I .
I I' I
I.. . ~;::i ~ ~ ~:]j
'-Ie.. c.. 0.. 0../0
:~8>og1l)1-
1'5..;'" 'lI:
(/)'~ ~ ~~!
I
!
8136598688
o
~ N M 11)1..".
~ ,.... ..- .- l.O
+
00..-0.,....
i
o 0.... OJ'''''
00 0 0'0
o 0 0 OjO
,
..,. ..,. .,. ~ I~
OOOOrO
I
1
I
M.,.M..,...,.
1"-
...-O.......O.N
010110...,....
..... ..- <"l
N..-..->oo>
1
I
I
to ,.... ~ <oIQJ
N
,
I
!
ooooio
:::!1 :::!1 :::!1 ::E1]i
a. a.. 0:: 0.. 0
~ ~ ~ ~I~
2:g 88,
M
..-
....
C") r-...
N
I'
,
C")o~
gN
....
000
00
000
00
..-
.,.
000
do
:;,~~
ON
Ol M
~ClOIt'l
ai..}
fB
N .,. <0
r-,....:.o
.... ......
r-...<o~
It) . ,
:il~
000
do
m~~
0=-
....~Sl
"Oa.Q
e~1-
Cl
I.... l.:c'
UJ ,~
Iw a:: I
.~~!'
(/):::> ,
II- B! .
I~ w:q: 2:
:::l I"::
...J f-
.e(
.u
M
~
i !.:c
'0 '0>
c( ii::
'0"0 i
1a::!3, .
~ 01
w~'
::I: 5'21
'~zl~
w .
:00
"
l"di .
'...J
'-:
....
<0
., ,
1;51
i~
'ei.
~
I
ADAMS TRAFfIC
Il'
u;
..-
N
~
~
o
o
:ii
0..
'fl
....
;;
115
....
'.:JC
'31'~::E 0 :; 0 ~ 0
'0.. 0-
j .~ u) 'fl
I a....- ,.....
i~~ ;;
:~iB.~ ~i;; ~ ~c! E ~
I~ g: ~.= ~ j;! ~ ~..2 ~
,i'g !2 ~ ~ ~ u. ,9~ LL
tnl" III ~ :;r;: .:0:
~c ~m m
I .~- ~a. ~
: u..
::i
,0
i~
:cf
o
.-~
N
o
t'oJ
...~
ci
PAGE
05
. '.<:1
!Q 1.!2>
<C . Q:;
0'0 .
1a::!5 !
io::.81 '
~~i
10oE;
,....lC/).!-.
I~ ;
!~.
i~'
1-.
,~
!.:tj
-00
8
000
c:i
'~i
i
CJ 0 0
o
NO
o
o
....
o
00
o
o
,
.~.
f-I
ei.
C1.
~
N to
N
000
o
amI'-
N '
o
OJ
N .... ..-
ai
<0 M
M ..-
It)NN
C"i
....
\"") co ....
Mg..-
::EO
0..
o
M
i,
::EOC!~O
0.. 00.
8 g
;; ~
~~
co
<0
ci
>0
N
CD ....
co
,....
ci
o
00 0
o
,....
MO ,....
NN
0>
M......
.....M
~
o
t'oJO .-
~ .;:
Q. a)0-
8 ~
~ ~
~
M ......
......~
o
t'oJ
IllN t'oJ
C"i
.....
..-
..-
'0
....
....
.x
I'tI
cf
(") CD
(") ,
:8
::E
a.. 00 0
~::E o~
"c.. 0-
:g~ ~
0" ..
;6 6
8M~-E~~
.. e.2 ~,I;j;! m
(!; ~~~~~~
E c( 111
e>. .f
u..0l
5
o
J:
m
Q.
Iprint Date: Feb/07/2005 C Florida Department of Transportation 0
Transportation Statistics Office
2003 Peak Season Factor Category Report
IPINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCF = 0.94
Category: 1500 Week Dates SF PSCF
1 01/01/2003 - 01/04/2003 1.05 1.12
I 2 01/05/2003 - 01/1I/2003 1.05 1.12
3 0I/12/2003 - 0I/18/2003 1.05 1.12
4 01/19/2003 - 01/25/2003 1.03 1.10
I 5 01/26/2003 - 02/01/2003 1.00 1.06
~6 02/02/2003 - 02/08/2003 0.98 1.04
* 7 02/09/2003 - 02/15/2003 0.96 1.02
* 8 02/16/2003 - 02/22/2003 0.95 1.01
I * 9 02/23/2003 - 03/01/2003 0.94 1.00
* 10 03/02/2003 - 03/08/2003 0.93 0.99
* 11 03/09/2003 - 03/15/2003 0.93 0.99
I * 12 03/16/2003 - 03/22/2003 0.93 0.99
* 13 03/23/2003 - 03/29/2003 0.93 0.99
* 14 03/30/2003 - 04/05/2003 0.93 0.99
* 15 04/06/2003 - 04/12/2003 0.93 0.99
I * 16 04/13/2003 - 04/19/2003 0.94 1.00
* 17 04/20/2003 - 04/26/2003 0.95 1.01
* 18 04/27/2003 - 05/03/2003 0.96 1.02
I * 19 05/04/2003 - 05/10/2003 0.97 1.03
20 05/11/2003 - 05/17/2003 0.98 1.04
21 05/18/2003 - OS/24/2003 0.99 1.05
= 22 OS/25/2003 - 05/31/2003 0.99 1.05
23 06/01/2003 - 06/07/2003 1.00 1.06
24 06/08/2003 - 06/14/2003 1.00 1.06
25 06/15/2003 - 06/2I/2003 1.01 1.07
I 26 06/22/2003 - 06/28/2003 1.00 1.06
27 06/29/2003 - 07/05/2003 1.00 1.06
28 07/06/2003 - 07/12/2003 1.00 1.06
I 29 07/13/2003 - 07/19/2003 1.00 1.06
30 07/20/2003 - 07/26/2003 1.00 1.06
31 07/27/2003 - 08/02/2003 1.00 1.06
I 32 08/03/2003 - 08/09/2003 1.01 1.07
33 08/10/2003 - 08/16/2003 1.01 1.07
34 08/17/2003 - 08/23/2003 1.02 1.09
35 08/24/2003 - 08/30/2003 1.03 1.10
I 36 08/31/2003 - 09/06/2003 1.04 1.11
37 09/07/2003 - 09/13/2003 1.04 1.11
38 09/14/2003 - 09/20/2003 1.05 1.12
I 39 09/21/2003 - 09/27/2003 1.04 1.11
40 09/28/2003 - 10/04/2003 1.04 1.11
41 10/05/2003 - 10/11/2003 1.03 1.10
I 42 10/12/2003 - 10/18/2003 1.02 1.09
43 10/19/2003 - 10/25/2003 1.03 1.10
44 10/26/2003 - 11/0 I/2003 1.03 1.10
45 11/02/2003 - 11/08/2003 1.04 1.11
I 46 11/09/2003 - 11/15/2003 1.04 1.11
47 11/16/2003 - 11/22/2003 1.04 1.11
48 11/23/2003 - 11/29/2003 1.05 1.12
I 49 11/30/2003 - 12/06/2003 1.05 1.12
50 12/07/2003 - 12/13/2003 1.05 1.12
51 12/14/2003 - 12/20/2003 1.05 1.12
52 12/2I/2003 - 12/27/2003 1.05 1.12
I 53 12/28/2003 - 12/3I/2003 1.05 1.12
I Note: "*" indicates peak season week Page
I
HCS2000: unsc:lalized Intersections Relea<:)4.1d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Major Street:
Vehicle
Approach
Movement
~ Analyst: KKG
Agency/Co.: FDC
Date Performed: 2/7/2005
I Analysis Time Period: Peak Hour 5:00 to 6:00
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
I Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2005
Project 10: Analysis with Proposed Project
I East/West Street: Calumet Street
North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS
I
I
Volume
Peak-Hour Factor, PHF
I Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type/Storage
I RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
II Upstream Signal?
I
Minor Street:
Approach
Movement
Volumes and
Northbound
2
T
1
L
39
0.95
41
2
Raised
7
L
1625
0.95
1710
curb
1
L
2
T
No
Westbound
8
T
Volume
I Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%) 0
I Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage
Lanes
Configuration
I
Approach
I Movement
Lane Config
PM
Study period (hrs):
0.25
Adjustments
3
R
Southbound
4 5 6
L T R
-----
916 42
0.95 0.95
964 44
/ 1
2 0
T TR
No
Eastbound
10 11 12
L T R
60 0 44
0.95 0.95 0.95
63 0 46
2 0 2
0
/ No /
0 1 0
LTR
9
R
Delay,
NB
1
L
Queue Length, and Level of
SB Westbound
478 9
41
683
0.06
0.19
10.6
B
Service
Eastbound
10 11
LTR
12
I v (vph)
C (m) (vph)
v/c
I 95% queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
I Approach LOS
I
109
239
0.46
2.21
32.1
o
32.1
o
I
o
o
HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.ld
I
I
I
Phone:
E-Mail:
Fax:
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
I Analyst: KKG
Agency/Co.: FDC
Date Performed: 2/7/2005
I Analysis Time Period: Peak Hour 5:00 to 6:00 PM
Intersection: Belcher at Calumet
Jurisdiction: County
I Units: U. S. Customary
Analysis Year: 2005
Project ID: Analysis with Proposed Project
East/West Street: Calumet Street
I North/South Street: Belcher Road
Intersection Orientation: NS
I
Study period (hrs):
0.25
Major Street Movements
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
123 4
L T R L
5
T
6
R
Volume
Peak Hour Factor, PHF
Peak-IS Minute Volume
Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Percent Grade (%)
I Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage
RT Channelized?
Lanes
I Configuration
n Volume
. Peak-Hour Factor, PHF
Peak-IS Minute Volume
I Hourly Flow Rate, HFR
Percent Heavy Vehicles
Median Type/Storage
I RT Channelized?
Lanes
Configuration
Upstream Signal?
I
I
I
39
0.95
10
41
2
Raised curb
1625
0.95
428
1710
916
0.95
241
964
42
0.95
11
44
/ 1
2 0
T TR
No
9 10 11 12
R L T R
60 0 44
0.95 0.95 0.95
16 0 12
63 0 46
2 0 2
0
/ No /
0 1 0
LTR
1
L
2
T
No
Minor Street Movements
7
L
8
T
o
Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments
13 14 15 16
I Movements
Flow (ped/hr)
o
o
o
o
I
I Lane Width (ft) 012.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0
Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0
I
Upstream Signal Data
I Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance
Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal
vph vph see see mph feet
~ S2 Left-Turn
Through
S5 Left-Turn
I Through
-----
Movement 2
Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles
I
I Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
III Number of major street through lanes:
I
Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation
Critical Gap Calculation
I Movemen t ~
I
8
T
4
L
7
L
9
R
t(c,base)
t(c,hv)
P(hv)
t(c,g)
I Grade/lOO
t(3,lt)
t (c,T) :
4. I
2.00
2
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.20
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.1
4.1
I-stage
2-stage
I-stage
2-stage
0.00
0.00
0.00
1. 00
0.00
1. 00
0.00
0.00
': t(c)
III
10
L
7.5
2.00
2
0.20
0.00
0.70
0.00
1. 00
6.8
5.8
Movement 5
11
T
6.5
2.00
o
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1. 00
6.5
5.5
12
R
6.9
2.00
2
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.9
6.9
~ Follow-Up Time Calculations
. Movemen t 1 4
L L
7
L
8
T
9
R
It (f, base)
t(f,HV)
P (HV)
I t(f)
10
L
11
T
12
R
1. 00
2.20
1. 00
2
2.2
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
I Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals
3.50
1. 00
2
3.5
4.00
1. 00
o
4.0
3.30
1. 00
2
3.3
Computation I-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal
Movement 2
V(t) V(l,prot)
I
I
V prog
Movement 5
V(t) V(l,prot)
(vph)
o
on green P
Computation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked
Movement 2
V(t) V(l,prot)
Movement 5
V(t) V(l,prot)
alpha
beta
T rave 1 time, t ( a ) ( s e c)
I Smoothing Factor, F
Proportion of conflicting flow, f
Max platooned flow, V(c,max)
I Min platooned flow, V(c,min)
Duration of blocked period, t(p)
Proportion time blocked, p
0.000
0.000
~ Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods
Result
p (2)
I p(5)
p(dom)
p (subo)
I Constrained
I
0.000
0.000
or unconstrained?
Proportion
unblocked
for minor
movements,
p (x)
( 1)
Single-stage
Process
(2) (3)
Two-Stage Process
Stage I Stage II
n p(l)
W p (4)
p(7)
P (8)
r1 p (9)
..! p(10)
P (11)
I p(12)
Computation 4 and 5
Single-Stage Process
I Movement
I
1
L
4
L
7
L
8
T
9
R
10
L
11
T
12
R
v c,x
s
Px
I V c,u,x
1008
1923
2778
504
C r,x
C plat,x
I
Two-Stage Process
7
8
10
11
I
I
I
I C(r,x)
C(plat,x)
Stagel
V(c,x)
s
P (x)
V(c,u,x)
StaO Stagel Stage2
I Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations
I Step 1: RT from Minor St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
I Pedestrian Impedance
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue
Factor
free St.
I Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Flows
I Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
n. Probability of Queue free St.
Maj L-Shared Prob Q free St.
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
I
I Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
n Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
. Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding
I Movement Capacity
I Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance
Cap. Adj. factor due
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue
I
Factor
to Impeding mvmnt
free St.
Step 4: LT from Minor St.
Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance
i
I
mvmnt
Step 3: TH from Minor St.
I
Part 1 - First Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance
Cap. Adj. factor due
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue
I
Factor
to Impeding mvmnt
free St.
Stagel sOe2
986 937
3000
9
1. 00
1. 00
4
1. 00
1. 00
8
1. 00
0.94
1. 00
7
1. 00
0.94
0.95
0.87
8
134
1. 00
0.94
126
1. 00
Stagel Stage2
986 1792
3000
12
504
513
1. 00
513
0.91
1
1008
683
1. 00
683
0.94
11
2778
19
1. 00
0.94
18
1. 00
10
1923
59
1. 00
0.94
55
11
986
328
1. 00
1. 00
328
1. 00
I Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows
I Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance
Cap. Adj. factor due
I Movement Capacity
-0-
o
Factor
to Impeding mvmnt
321
1. 00
1. 00
321
1792
134
1. 00
0.94
126
Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance
Cap. Adj. factor due
I Movement Capacity
I
Factor
to Impeding mvrnnt
1. 00
0.94
2778
19
1. 00
0.94
18
Result for 2 stage process:
a
0.91
0.91
2.87
90
1. 00
I ~ t
Probability of Queue free St.
1. 00
I Step 4 : LT from Minor St.
Part 1 - First Stage
I Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
I Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt
Movement Capacity
I Part 2 - Second Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
I Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
7
10
121
1. 00
0.94
114
986
322
1. 00
1. 00
322
593
1. 00
0.91
540
937
342
1. 00
0.94
321
I Part 3 - Single Stage
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
I Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding
Movement Capacity
mvmnt
1. 00
0.94
0.95
0.87
1923
59
1. 00
n
.
0.94
55
1"1
.
Results for Two-stage process:
a
y
C t
0.91
0.91
1. 00
172
.
Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations
Movement
7
L
8
T
9
R
10
L
11
T
12
R
I
I
Volume (vph)
Movement Capacity (vph)
Shared Lane Capacity (vph)
63
172
o
90
239
46
513
fl
.
-.
I Worksheet 9-Computation o~ffect of Flared Minor Streec:lpproaches
I
Movement
7
L
9
R
10
L
11
T
12
R
C sep
I Volume
Delay
Q sep
Q sep
round
172
63
90
o
513
46
I
+1
(Qsep +1)
1-. n max
C sh
SUM C sep
n
I C act
239
II Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service
--
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Config L LTR
v (vph) 41 109
C(m) (vph) 683 239
vlc 0.06 0.46
95% queue length 0.19 2.21
Control Delay 10.6 32.1
LOS B D
Approach Delay 32.1
Approach LOS D
I
-
I
I Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
p(oj)
v (il) ,
., v(i2),
. s(il),
s (i2) ,
I P*(oj)
d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4
N, Number of major street through
I d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5
Volume for
Volume for
Saturation
Saturation
stream 2 or 5
stream 3 or 6
flow rate for
flow rate for
stream
stream
Movement 2 Movement 5
----
0.94 1. 00
2 or 5
3 or 6
10.6
,.,
. I
.
lanes
I
I
I
~
I
o
o
I
TABLE 4 - 7
GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS.
Level of Service
ABC D
100 340 670 950
1,060 1,720 2,500 3,230
1,600 2,590 3,740 4,840
STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS
Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile)
Level of Service
B C
220 720
1,530 1,810
2,330 2,720
3,030 3,460
~
I
Lanes Divided
I Undivided
2 Divided
3 Divided
I
Lanes Divided
I Undivided
2 Divided
3 Divided
4 Divided
I
UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS
A
..
250
380
490
m
Lanes Divided
I Undivided
2 Divided
3 Divided
4 Divided
Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile)
Level of Service
B C
100 590
220 1,360
340 2,110
440 2,790
D
810
1,710
2,570
3,330
I
A
..
..
..
..
D
860
1,860
2,790
3,540
Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not
within primary city central business district of an
urbanized area over 750,000)
FREEWAYS
E
1,300
3,670
5,500
Interchange spacing ~ 2 mi. apart
Level of Service
B 'C
2,110 2,940
3,260 4,550
4,410 6,150
5,560 7,760
6,710 9,360
D E
3,580 3,980
5,530 6,150
7,480 8,320
9,440 10,480
11,390 12,650
D E
3,440 3,910
5,410 6,150
7,380 8,380
9,340 10,620
11,310 12,850
Lanes
2
3
4
5
6
A
1,270
1,970
2,660
3,360
4,050
E
890
Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart
Level of Service
B C
1,840 2,660
2,890 4,180
3,940 5,700
4,990 7,220
6,040 8,740
...
...
...
Lanes
2
3
4
5
6
A
1,130
1,780
2,340
3,080
3,730
E
850
1,800
2,710
3,500
BICYCLE MODE
(Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of
bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.)
Paved Shoulder/ Level of Service
Level of Service Bicycle Lane
Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E
I Undivided .. .. 280 660 810 0-49% .. .. 170 720 >720
2 Divided .. .. 650 1,510 1,720 50-84% .. 130 210 >210 ...
3 Divided .. .. 1,020 2,330 2,580 85-100"10 160 380 >380 ... ...
4 Divided .. .. 1,350 3,070 3,330
I
I
..,
.
Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within
primary city central business district of an urbanized area
over 750,000)
Level of Service
Lanes Divided A B C
I Undivided .. .. 270
2 Divided .. .. 650
3 Divided .. .. 1,000
4 Divided .. .. 1,350
I
PEDESTRIAN MODE
(Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway
geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not the number of
pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below
by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.)
D E
720 780 Level of Service
1,580 1,660 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
2,390 2,490 0-49% .. .. .. 330 810
3,130 3,250 50-84% .. .. .. 520 990
85-100% .. 120 590 >590 ...
NON-STATE ROADWAYS
Major City/County Roadways BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)
Level of Service (Buses per hour)
Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service
I Undivided .. .. 480 760 810 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E
2 Divided .. .. 1,120 1,620 1,720 0-84% *. >5 ~ ~3 ~2
3 Divided .. .. 1,740 2,4 50 2,580 85-100% >6 >4 ~3 ~2 ~I
Florida Department of Transportation
Systems Planning Office
605 Suwannee Street, MS 19
Tallahassee, FL 32399..Q450
http://wwwll.myflorida.comlplanninglsystems/smllos/defaulthtm
ONE WAY FACILITIES
Increase corresponding volume 20%
.This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications, 10e computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning
applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Values shown are hourly directional volumes for levels of
service and are for the automobile/trud:: modes unless specifically stated, Level of service letter grade thresholds arc probably not comparable across modes and. therefore, cross modal comparisons should be
made with caution. Furthennore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended. To convert to aMual average daily traffic volumes. these.
volumes must be divided by appropriate 0 and K factors. The table's input value defaults and level of service criteria appear on the following page, Calculations are based on plarming applications ofthc
flighway Capacity Manual. Bicycle WS Model. Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle. pedestrian and bus modes.
"Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. .
...Not applicable for that level of service letter Snide. For automobileltruck modes., volumes greater than level of service 0 become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle
and pedestrian modes. the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults.
1
.
I
I
Lanes Divided
I Undivided
2 Divided
I
Source:
I
I
I
Other Signalized Roadways
(signalized intersection analysis)
Level of Service
ABC
.. .. 250
.. .. 580
D
530
1,140
02/22/02
E
660
1,320
ARTERIAUNON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS
DlVIDEDIUNDlVIDED
(alter corresponding volumes by the indicated percent)
Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors
I Divided Yes +5%
I Undivided No -20%
Multi Undivided Yes -5%
Multi Undivided No -25%
97
o
e
ORIGINAL
DESCRIPTION:
A part of Lot J 2, CLEAR WATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to tbe plat thereof,
recorded in Plat. Book 44, Page 46, Public Records of Pinellas County, FIOIida, more
particularly described as follows:
Commence at the Northwest corner of said Lot 12; thence South 89 degrees 2] '49" East
(plat bearing and basis of bearings for this descri.ption), along the North boundary of said
Lot 12,208.00 feet for a POTNT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89 degrees 21 '49" East,
continuing along the North boundary of said Lot 12,377.16 feet; thence Soutb 00 degrees
02'48" West, along the West right-of-\\lay line of Belcher Road, 55.00 feet Westerly of
and parallel to the East boundary of the Southeast one-qumier (1/4) of Section ],
Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being the West boundary of
public right-of-way conveyed to Pinellas County by Quit-Claim Deed recorded
November 17, 1976 in O.R. Book. 4478, Page 21 J 3, Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida, 379.98 feet; thence North 89 degrees 2)'49" West, along the South boundary of
said Lot 12, 376.66 feet to a point lying South 89 degrees 21'49" Ea,:>t of and 200.00 feet
from the Southwest corner of said Lot 12; thence North 00 degrees 01'42" West, 379.98
feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
RECEIVED
MAR 3 1 2005
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
cnv OF CLEARWATER
Apr 15 2005 12:39PM
"tI
."
0'0
(I>
o
...,
-t
::T
(ii'
Ql
'0
'2.
C'j'
~
o'
:J
~
cr
<tl
m;l
~. iii'
::!: /A'
1Il t:J;J
0....
~~-t
a. (D :r
~ "S'U;
c: 0' (j)
f~z
-:JO
C"llJ-l
CD -0 .
:J "C >.
o ="'D
::-.0 m
ffi" ~, ::0
0.05:
Q1:J_
CIl O':-l
0;
:r"C
CD co
o 3
c: _,
n-:-t'
o
3
<D
~
::;
<tl
tll
'0
'2.
g
o'
:J
,.,
;Q
~
~.
~
,~
0-
1=.Qe
-<~m
oc<
.,.,.YiI'l'.
%t'"'
.. 000
, "'O"t'l
"'01:
> m
:Dmz
::em...
>:0
"'<fID
m-
;zoO
m
en
-......
C----,
... ~'-'J
C'-". . '----
. .....-
Inii1
~
Gii11
l::J
~t
Ifiii)
~_-::J
,.
-0
^'
-
""
~
~
t:)LASERJET 3330
fllIl-
....
N N
=> 0
VI Ul
1= b
Q 0
"'d
Il.l
S
II>
::I
....
~
;
o
~
~
~
t'I1
~
~
~
::j
~
~
;;0
b
\C
o
./:>.
o
.....
-
::s
i:l
C>
....
'"
o
::s
>
9
Q
a
~
Q,
~
[
~
~
It
.,
e:
eo
~
~
~
:0:-
~
n
g
a
~
g=
~
~
~.
-<
It
Q.
"'d
Il.l
'<
~
::I
!?
t"'"
g
~ n ~
o I ~
8 ~
I..t1
I
o
I.>.l
8
I.>.l
p.2
'-T
.~
~
n
~
_.
~
=#:
0"
l>> 1-01
;"N
... Q
==
!.NlJl
~=
S8
==
==
U'lQ
Q
Q
Q
=
N
~
1-01
.i-
~ :;3
~
~
"'
::!l '='
~ m
0: 9.
n ~
n <s-
o =
~
~
~
too
~.
i
~
Q
g
:= ~
'? -<:
~ f
~ ~
to,,) 8
a
~
.~.
....
~
.....~
0'1 IN
~s
'tl 8-
s: l)1i';
'I:
-,
.~.
~
....
~
~
1=
=>
r
!a
...,
e:.
Q.
-
N
~
8
o
o
FLD2003-0904 7 A
1750 N BELCHER RD
Date Received: 04/04/2005
GTE CREDIT UNION
ZONING DISTRICT: IRT
LAND USE: IL
ATLAS PAGE: 262B
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
CLWCoverSheet
_1011111"1'",,;:-..,.
. il ~ r.. ~.LOF Ih'f.< -<::~.;..
tV.~ ~\;"y..,.. ,t',1;l,;'"
A~L~~.,tl ....#..;....?,.l:~~
..~'-......,' j ~-~'"
~'e.:;.' \ I . ~ c>..
11 t~'r\!J- ~ ~.~
,,~~ .=:.._~~~.Ir\
;;.~; ===_ ......."..l!~~
...d - ---- --- "-,;.,n,;:' 'Il
~'.Y.L);.--_. .'('~;"
.S:-.($......_~~;,-..~~,\\
~......,~TH\"".
1'~.III'
o
CITY OF
o
CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PLA."lNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33756
TElEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
May 18, 2005
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
2550 Permit Place
Holiday, FL 34655
RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2003-09047 A
1750 North Belcher Road
Dear Mr. Figurski:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On May 17, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for
Flexible Development approval to modifY an adopted condition of approval relating to hours of operation
for retail sales (financial services), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-1304.C (previously approved under Case No. FLD2003-09047, approved by the
Community Development Board on December 16, 2003, a Flexible Development application to permit
retail sales [financial services] with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street (North
Belcher Road], to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the
use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-1304.C). The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the
applications with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section "l-1304.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to development/redevelopment
efforts of the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval: (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD2003-09047)
* 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
*2. That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union. The applicant shall
record a covenant in the public records restricting the use of this building on the subject property, as
contained in this condition, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union.
Any future change of use of this building to a bank shall require the following:
a. Construction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left turn lane
of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida Department of Transportation
design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road. Construction of this
BRJAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSI01>ER
FRANK HIllIlARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.I.]ONSON, CO_\I~tlSSIOt'iER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
o
o
t
May 18, 2005
Figurski - Page Two
improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an Occupational License for the
bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank, for the future construction of a traffic signal light at
the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted by a Traffic
Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a shared portion of the
full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion shall not exceed 50 percent of
the full cost. If, in the event that a traffic signal light is not warranted based on the
Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant.
*3. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits for
the proposed credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
*4.. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding of the
lighting by tree canopy; and
*5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity.
Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in height.
Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is required for more than one freestanding sign on
either street frontage.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (May 17, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application. .
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 1, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner ill, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myclearwater.comlgov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
Sincerely, __
~jp~
Mic~~kp
Planning Director
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)I/nactive or Finished ApplicationslBelcher N /750 GTE Federal Credit Union (/RT) _
ApprovedlBelcher N /750 Development Order #2 5./8. 05. doc
ll..
o
.
o
>-
u
TO:
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
~Q_J:"\"" ~5~~~\..\
~.
. 9 44-.. ~-, \\
FAX:
Phone: q +- '2... - 'D,:3 '3
FROM: ~)0'vA ~ W ~\ \~ Phone: S \.1 1. -=-- -+ s U~
DATE:c- S \5\ ~S RE: 17:Jt) N. l3u1c\-u \~ .
MESSAGE:_~~~'t~~~'~t ~,~t~ bor~J ~fo :k
rye, ~~~. .
p-r-~Si1 \~~ ~ ~ .~ ., ~c\.\\~"
i;-=o-LC€f~\'\t. \oj n-i;\~~ ~ I~J1.o<>~.
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 7
'::,Et j[I I t JCl PEF'OF'T
o
o
..
Ma~. 09 2005 02:50PM
YOUR LOGO
YOUR FAX NO.
Cit~OfClearwater-F'lan Dept
727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE
01 99443711
START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
Ma~.09 02:47PM 03'03 SND 07 OK
TO TURN CFF REPffiT, PRESS 'MENU' 1:*04.
TI-B-l SELECT CFF BY USI~ '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADUANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-I-I8..P-FAX (435-7329).
: i.~
..:11....
" .~ ',., . .
..", ~. '.
. '^'~. ..~. .
-
.'.........,
".,
· .,It.v
PREPA:Rl!D BY dTURll TO,
J. PAUL RAYMOND, Esquire
Macfarlane Fergu50n & MCMull~n
625 Court Street, .Suite 200.....
Post Office .Box 1669 (33757)~'
Clearwater, Florida 33756
o
KARlEEN F. De 1ll.AKER, C~ Of' COURT
PlNaJ.Aa COUNTY FLllImA
INSTIl Z1lO42047S1 0S/11i2OO4 .. 11~ AM
Ol'F REC BK: 13'7' PO: 10'7-1011
DacType:cefDRECOIUlIHO: $1"'0
o DOC STAMP: $~600.DO
WARRANTY DEBD
ORIGINAL
. ..,.
THIS INDBNTURE made. this. K day of May, 2004, by and
between l3ELCAL. :PROPSR'l'lES ':.. l.LC,' a Florida 11m! ted liability
company of the County of PINELLAS, in the State of FLORIDA, Party
of the First Part, whose mailing address is 2040 Northeast
coachman Road, Clearwater, FL 33765, and G'l'E FEDERAL CREDIT UNrO~.
a credit Union organized and existing under the lawS of the united
States of America of the County of Hillsborough, in the State of
Florida, Party of the second Part, whose mailing address is 711
l
I
I
South Dale Mabry Highway, Tampa, FL 33609.
WIT N S S S B T H:
That the said Party of the First Part, for and in consider-
ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to him in hand paid by
the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said party of
the Second Part, their heirs and assigns forever, the following
described land, sitl)ate lying and being in the County of Pinellas,
State of ~lorida, to-wit:
That certain oondominium parC!e~ described as Unit I,
and an undivided sha.re in the C01lllllon e~ements
appurtenant thereto I. according to the. Declaration of
Condominium of BELCAL COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM, and
rB~ated documents.as recorded in O.R. Book 13544, page
1992 and the .P~at thereof as recordod in Condomni.um
plat Book 132, at pages 32, all in the public records
of pine11as count~, Florida.
Subj ect to
reservations
HEREBY,
~arcel I.D. No. NOT YET ~SSIGNED
2004 real estate taxes, re~trictions,
and easements of record, NOT REIM~OSED
RECEIVED
MAR. 3 1 2005
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
CllV OF ClEARWATfP
~
o
~RlGl[~J-\L
And the said I?arty of the 'First Part does hereby fully warrant the
title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I the said Party of the First Part haa
herewlto set his hand and seal.the day a~d year first above writ-
ten.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in Our Presence;
i~//J 7pany
.~p,~ By:
Print '" ~....t~
(SEAL)
Member
~~~~"~
PritNm C4lCj ..t:t:'k~,1-t
StAl'E: OF Fl:.ORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
I HEREBY CBRTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before
me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take
acknowledgments, MARK S. KLEIN, Managing Member of BELCAL
PROPERTIES, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, to me
personally known or who has produced Nlr as
identification and who did take an oath, and known to me to be the
individual(sl described in and who executed the foregoing instru-
ment and he acknowledged before me that he executed the same for
the purposes therein expressed.
WITNESS my p~~ and official seal
and State, this ~ day of May, 2004.
County
h:ldlIlaln:llbullclhcl(II-dtd.doc
'?J J I'N Aormond
. . i4y CCf!IIl_ D01~
\': .i E>cpI.... ....UV..l 10, 200lI
RECEIVED
MAR 3 1 2005
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
o
o
jf,g~ffL,-r;'r..r,
1 V ~x.!\ OF rtl!.if's:"
"l~'.j, ~,I,"UJ,;#c;7>",_
.4.." ;.. -"J ...."" ,.1....
.;'::--:.;" I ~~...-"
~~:~,\ //Yf'{i' 1~ ~ ':-
~C":3:-(\-~...... '~'1
'" r:: ~ :::::::=-.:.'~ .~i. --
........... .----- .~ Si,
..... -:. --==- L'i::'''
~~..~._-- .,~~~
.... ........._~.t \
-.... If/.''~III'''~'\:),.\
~~~.)1TE~,. ,t'
-""'1'"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
April 22, 2005
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
2550 Permit Place
Holiday, FL 34655
Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2003-09047A) - 1750 North
Belcher Road
Dear Mr. Figurski:
The Case No. FLD2003-09047A for Flexible Development approval to modify an adopted
condition of approval relating to hours of operation for a retail sales (financial services), as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C
(previously approved under Case No. FLD2003-09047, approved by the Community
Development Board on December 16, 2003, a Flexible Development application to permit retail
sales [financial services] with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street [North
Belcher Road], to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to
allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C), has been scheduled to be
reviewed by the Community Development Board on May 17, 2005.
The meeting will take place at 1 :00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at
112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
W~~ M.\N~
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Planner III
S:IPlanning Department\C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (/RT) - Approved
- 5./7.05 CDB - WWlBelcher N /750 5./7.05 CDB Letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, CO~IMISSIONER
FRANK HIBllARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIOKER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.. .~!_~. _~~_.2 0 ?_~._~~ :.3 9!.~-V A S E R J~! 3330
o
p. 1
Fax
FIGURSKI & HARRILL
THE HOLIDAY TOWER
2435 u.s. HIGHWAY 19, SUITE 350
HOLIDAY, FLORIDA 34691
Phone Number: (727) 942-073 D IE @II01tJ'O;--St
Fax Number: (727) 944-3711. 11: W
NEIGHB~EhoPMENT &
C /Tv o~ COlOEDA RSWE R V ICE S
. ATE q
To:
April 15, 2005
Wayne Wells
Date Sent:
Fax No:
562-4576
From:
Gerald A. Figurski, EsquireIMaureen
Re:
GTE
Total pages, including cover: 2 .
(If you do not receive all of the pages indicatedt please call our office as soon as possible)
COMMENTS:
Wayne,
Following is the receipt as you requested. Please call if I can be of further
assistance.
Maureen
CONFIDENTIAL WARNING - THIS TRANSMISSION MAY CONTAIN CBRT AIN INFORMATION WHICH IS PRIVILEGED
OR CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOI'THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS 1RANSMISSION AND RECEIVED [T IN ERROR.
PLEASE CONTACT TIlE SENDER IDENTIFIED ABOVB FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS.
-,
GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A.
J. BEN HARRILL, P.A.
SHELLY MAY JOHNSON
L. RICK RIVERA
c;IGURSKI & HARRILO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH
2550 PERMIT PLACE
NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655
www.fhlaw.net
TELEPHONE: (727) 942-0733
FAX: (727) 944-3711
ORIGINAL
March 29,2005
HAND DELIVERED
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
Municipal Services Building
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
RE: GTE Federal Credit Union
Case No. FLD2003-09047, 1750 North Belcher Road
Dear Wayne:
This firm represents GTE Federal Credit Union. Enclosed on my client's behalf
please find the original Flexible Development Application, appropriate copies,
supporting documentation and fees.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
'"
J
m
nclosures
cc: Michael J. Freedman, Esquire
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner/Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
o
o
May 17. 2005
FLD2003-0904 7 A
F2
GTE Federal Credit Union'
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski. Esquire
1750 North Belcher Road
ORIGINAL
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
EXISTING ZONING/
LAND USE:
PROPERTY SIZE:
PROPERTY USE:
ADJACENT ZONING/
LAND USES:
Flexible Development approval to modify an adopted condition of
approval relating to hours of operation for retail sales (financial
services), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-1304.C (previously approved under Case
No. FLD2003-09047, approved by the Community Development
Board on December 16, 2003, a Flexible Development application to
permit retail sales [financial services] with deviations to allow direct
access to a major arterial street [North Belcher Road], to allow the
use llS a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to
allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions
of Section 2-1304.C).
Industrial, Research and Technology District (IRT)
Industrial Limited (IL)
3.288 acres
Current Use: St. Petersburg Times distribution building
(constructed under BCP2003-03528), GTE Credit Union
(constructed under BCP2004-06245) and an office building (being
constructed under BCP2004-02057)
Proposed Use: St. Petersburg Times distribution building, GTE
Credit Union and office building
North: Industrial uses
West: Vehicle repair (Hunter Blood Services - Bloodmobile)
East: Detached dwellings
South: Fire Station
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005
Case FLD2003-09047 A - Page 1 of 6
o
o
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 3.288-acre site is located at the southwest comer of
North Belcher Road and Calumet Street. North Belcher Road is a heavily traveled, four-lane
divided roadway. The east side of North Belcher Road is residentially developed with single-
family detached dwellings. The west side of North Belcher Road is developed industrially. The
site was formerly developed with an office building, which was demolished under BCP2003-
03525. Under BCP2003-03528, the site has been developed with a St. Petersburg Times
distribution building on the west side facing Calumet Street. The site has also been constructed
with the GTE Credit Union (constructed under BCP2004-06245) and an office building (being
constructed under BCP2004-02057). The GTE Credit Union was approved by the Community
Development Board (CDB) under Case No. FLD2003-09047 on December 16, 2003, with five
conditions.
Proposal: The proposal approved by the CDB in 2003 for the GTE Credit Union included the
following condition:
2. That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union with hours of
operation ending at 5:00 pm daily. The applicant shall record a covenant in the public
records restricting the use of this building on the subject property, as contained in this
condition, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union. Any
future change of use of this building to a bank shall require the following:
a. Construction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left turn
lane of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida Department of
Transportation design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road.
Construction of this improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank, for the future construction of a traffic signal light at
the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted by a Traffic
Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a shared portion of the
full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion shall not exceed 50 percent
of the full cost. If, in the event that a traffic signal light is not warranted based on the
Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant.
The applicant is now requesting to modify this condition to allow the credit union to be open until
6:00 pm on Fridays, to allow banking services available to customers after working hours on
Fridays. The original condition was included due to the Traffic Study conducted by the applicant
in 2003, which indicated the Level of Service (LOS) on Belcher Road to be LOS F. However, a
new Traffic Study has been conducted that indicates the LOS on Belcher Road to now be a LOS D,
which is within acceptable ranges. The primary factor affecting this Level of Service change was
the opening of Keene Road. From a Traffic Engineering standpoint, these changed circumstances
support the applicant's request. No street modifications or additional conditions are required for
this modification of the operating hours. The portion of the condition regarding turn lanes and a
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005
Case FLD2003-0904 7 A - Page 2 of 6
o
o
traffic signal study if the property is converted to a full service bank should be retained as a
condition of approval for this modification.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability
criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2-
1304.C) have been met. '
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA (Sections 2-1301.1 and 2-1302):
(Th till . . r d d FLD2003 09047 db h CDB D b 16 2003)
e 0 owmg IS as Iste un er - , approve lyt e on ecem er ,
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM FLOOR 0.21 X
AREA RATIO (FAR)
(0.65)
IMPERVIOUS 0.72 X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (0.85)
LOT AREA (20,000 143,210 square feet; 3.288 acres X
sq. ft. minimum)
LOT WIDTH (200 Belcher Road: 380 feet X
feet minimum) Calumet Street: 377 feet
FRONT SETBACK Belcher Road: 20 feet (to pavement) X
(20 feet minimum) Calumet Street: 21 feet (to pavement)
REAR SETBACK (15 N/A (Comer lots have two front X
feet minimum) setbacks and two side setbacks)
SIDE SETBACK (15 West: 15 feet (to pavement) X
feet minimum) South: 30 feet (to pavement)
HEIGHT (50 feet St. Pete Times building: 20 feet X
maximum) Office building: 38 feet
GTE Credit Union buildinp: 24 feet
PARKING SPACES 125 spaces X
(Distribution: 1.5/1000
sf; Office: 3/1 000 sf;
Retail: 5/1 000 sf) (76
spaces rea.)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005
Case FLD2003-0904 7 A - Page 3 of 6
-
o
o
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-1304.C):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The use or mIX of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X
Redevelopment Proiect is compatible with adiacent land uses.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensi ve Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS Section 3-913 :
Consistent Inconsistent
1. X
2. X
3. X
4. X
5. of the X
6. X
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17,2005
Case FLD2003-0904 7 A - Page 4 of 6
-
o
o
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
FINDINGS
1. The subject 3.288 acres is zoned Industrial, Research and Technology District (IRT);
2. The GTE Credit Union was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) under
Case No. FLD2003-09047 on December 16,2003, with five conditions;
3. This portion of the site has been developed with the GTE Credit Union, under Building
Permit # BCP2004-06245;
4. The Traffic Study submitted in 2003 indicated Belcher Road was at a Level of Service
(LOS) F and the proposed credit union would not improve the LOS;
5. A new Traffic Study has been conducted that now indicates the LOS on Belcher Road to be
a LOS D, due primarily to the opening of Keene Road;
6. The condition of approval imposed by the Community Development Board on the original
approval of the credit union was based on the LOS F for Belcher Road;
7. The changed circumstances support the applicant's request to modify the hours of
operation restriction imposed on the original approval;
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C;
2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability
criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and
3. Based on the above findings and proposed modified conditions, Staff recommends
approval of this application.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the original application and supporting materials
on October 30, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development application to modify an adopted condition of approval relating to hours of operation
for retail sales (financial services), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-l304.C (previously approved under Case No. FLD2003-09047, approved
by the Community Development Board on December 16, 2003, a Flexible Development
application to permit retail sales [financial services] with deviations to allow direct access to a
major arterial street [North Belcher Road], to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate,
primary building and to allow the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C) for the
site at 1750 North Belcher Road, with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-l304.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17,2005
Case FLD2003-0904 7 A - Page 5 of 6
o
o
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to
development/redevelopment efforts of the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval: (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD2003-09047)
* 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
*2. That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union "'lith hours of
operation ending at 5 :00 pm daily. The applicant shall record a covenant in the public records
restricting the use of this building on the subject property, as contained in this condition, prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union. Any future change of use of
this building to a bank shall require the following:
a. Construction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left turn
lane of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida Department of
Transportation design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road.
Construction of this improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank, for the future construction of a traffic signal
light at the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted by
a Traffic Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a shared
portion of the full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion shall not
exceed 50 percent of the full cost. If, in the event that a traffic signal light is not
warranted based on the Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant.
*3. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building
permits for the proposed credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
*4. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding of
the lighting by tree canopy; and
*5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of
uniformity. Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in
height. Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is required for more than one
freestanding sign on either street frontage.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
M. hA
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases I Up for the next CDBIBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (IRT) - Approved -
5.17.05 CDB - WWlBelcher N 1750 Staff Reportfor 5.17.05 CDB.doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - May 17, 2005
Case FLD2003-0904 7 A - Page 6 of 6
~
o
o
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Rice, Scott
Thursday, April 21,20053:33 PM
Wells, Wayne
Elbo, Bennett
FLS2003-0904 7 A - 1750 N Belcher
Wayne,
Bennett and I have completed review of the referenced application. Due to the opening of Keene Road since the initial
revievv vvas conducted, the intersection of Calumet and Belcher now has a Level of Service D. No street modifications or
additional conditions are required for this modification of the operating hours. The conditions from the DO regarding turn
lanes and a traffic signal study if the property is converted to a full service bank, should be repeated as conditions of
approval of this modification. Permit Plan has been updated.
D. Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyC/earwater.com
1
Wells, Wayne
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Wells, Wayne
Monday, April 04, 2005 2:09 PM
Watkins, Sherry; Rice, Scott
Elbo, Bennett
FLD2003-09047A - 1750 N. Belcher Road, GTE Credit Union
Sherry & Scott -
The original case for the above address was approved by the COB on December 16, 2003 (Case FLD2003-09047).
Included in the approval vvas a condition:
pm
That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union with hours of operation ending at 5:00
daily. The applicant shall record a covenant in the public records restricting the use of this building on the subject
property, as contained in this condition, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union.
future change of use of this building to a bank shall require the follovving:
a. Construction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left turn lane of adequate storage
according to City and Florida Department of Transportation design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher
Construction of this improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an Occupational License for the
Any
length,
Road.
bank;
b. Establishment of an escrovv account with the City, prior to the issuance of an Occupational License for the
bank, for the future construction of a traffic signal light at the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet
Street, if vvarranted by a Traffic Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrovv account vvill be a shared portion of the
full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion shall not exceed 50 percent of the full cost. If, in the event
that a traffic signal light is not vvarranted based on the Study, funds vvill be refunded to the applicant.
The above case has been (re)submitted to request an amendment of this condition. A revised Traffic Study has been
submitted. Duet to the nature of the request, this case is not being scheduled for DRC revievv, but rather going straight to
the COB. Only 15 copies have been submitted for COB packages. Please come over and review the information to
determine vvhether it is acceptable (sufficient) to be placed on the May 17, 2005, COB agenda.
Should you have any questions, see me or call me.
Wayne
1
~inellas County Property Apprr' ~er Information: 01 29 15 06214 000 001 f)
Page 2 of5
01 / 29 / 15 / 06214 / 000 / 0010
o 5-Ap r- 2 0 0 5 JiM 5Mi th, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 07:34:42
Ownership InforMation Condo/Pud Property Add ress. Use. and SaJ.es
GTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION OBK: 13579 OPG: 1087
711 5 DA L E HABRY HWY
TAHPA FL 33609-4408
EVACUA T ION ZON E: NONE
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1750 BELCH ER RD
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: .00
sales froM 2002 - 2003:
0 5ale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 5 /2.004 13.519/1. 087 500.000 (U) I
2004: Book 132 Pgs 032- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2004 Value EXEMPTION5
Just/Market: 113.100 HOMestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt ExeM: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 113.100 Institutional ExeM: NO Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Historic ExeM: 0
Taxable: 113.100 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax InforMation
District: CW 5eawall: Frontage:
CJ.earUJater View:
04 Mi llage : 22.9694 Land 5ize Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price units Meth
04 Taxes: 2.597.84
1) 0 x 0 .00 .00
5pecial Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
3) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
Without the 5ave-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
2.597.84 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions,
2004 taxes will be :
2.597.84
5hort Legal BELCAL COHHERCIAL CONDO UNIT 1
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbinlcgi -scr3 70= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&p... 4/5/2005
Pinellas County Property Apprr' ~er Information: 01 29 15 06214 000 001 ()
Page 3 of5
Prop~Jj:.Y_andLand l1~eC_Qde des~ripJions
01 / 29 / 15 / 06214 / 000 / 0010
05-Apr-2005 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 01:34:41
General InforMation Property Use: 248 Yr BIt: 2,004
Apt **: Size: 29,565 Floor: 01
RECREATION
SITE
DATA
None
View
Building
Location
Balcony/Porch
standard
warehouse
co rne r
none
es
Condo/Planned Unit Extra Featur
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[t][f]~~
http://pao.eo.pinellas.fl. us/htbin/egi -ser3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &e= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&p... 4/5/2005
Pinellas County Property Apprr' ~er Information: 01 29 15 06214 000 001 f)
2JIS~
C/JLUMET
ST
':::>180
C.4LJ.JMET
::,1
2198
CALUMET
ST
STREET
1750
r- -, BEL~ER
(~{::: ~::' I 4
<.-' '__I L-
~-~
165
,,~4v1E T
.:)
-----~
-~~
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
@]
a::
UJ
::I:
U
..J
UJ
CD
2201
M.A.t'-lOR
BLVD
17b2
MANOR
AVE
\~C ~
Ie)
tvA.~l R
AVE
175Ll
M.A f'.l 0 F.'
,AVE
17t:1Q
M.At',l 0 R
,AVE
1748
MAf'.lO R
,AVE
1736
M.ANOR
.A,VE
1740
MANOR
,bVE
173,::]
MAf'.lOR
.AVE
17,32
tvlA~J~R
A. '.,{
1728
MAI"JDR
.AVE
172"1
Page 4 of5
r
l.LJ
~
Z
U.J
>
<
tv~~1
BL'
Il t
tv1M,
AV
I,'f
M8.~,
,A. V
17f
MAJ.
,A. V
17f
tvlAt'-.
,A,v
17 Ll
MA.~\
Air
-TTZI
MAt'-.
,6. V
17.:
MAt'
,r:" \
If.:
M~~
,IJ.. \.
17
tvlA
A
--17
MA
A
t~.L
/1"
-
a:::
o
z
~
.
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinlcgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b= 1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=O&p... 4/5/2005
Pine lIas County Property Apprr' ~er Information: 01 29 15 06214 000 001 f)
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
8'lCk.Jo$carch...Pagc
A:tL~xplanatioILof thiss.-CIC_CJ1
http://pao.eo.pinelIas.fl. us/htbin/egi -ser3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &e= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t3= 1 &u=O&p... 4/5/2005
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public
hearings on Tuesday, May 17, 2005, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in
City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following
requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the
meetinl!. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff. neil!hborinl! property
owners. etc. will be placed on a consent al!enda and approved by a sinl!le vote at the
bel!inninl! of the meetinl!.
1. (Cont. from 04-19-05) Clearwater Yacht Club. Inc. is requesting Flexible Development
approval to permit a 3 story, 18,500 sq ft Yacht Club with offices, exercise room, restaurant and
parking garage structure, with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft to
pavement and 4 ft to building structure; to permit a building within the sight visibility triangles
along Bayway Blvd, a reduction of rear (north) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to paver deck and 18
ft to building and an increase in building height from 25 ft to 46.5 ft to mean roof height, as a
Comprehensive Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.E. (Proposed Use: Marina) at
830 Bavway Blvd, Bayside Sub No 6 Unit A, Blk D, Lots 5-11 Inc!. FLD2005-01008
2. (Cont. from 04-19-05) Skiff Point of Clearwater. LLC is requesting Flexible Development
approval to permit 15 attached dwelling units with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25
ft to 15 ft to building and from 25 ft to 3 ft to pavement; a reduction to the side (north and south)
setbacks from 10 ft to 6.5 ft to building and 5 ft to parking; a reduction to the rear (south) setback
from 15 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 5 ft to pool and 7.5 ft to parking; and an increase in height from
30 ft to 49 ft to roof deck and additional 4 ft for parapet (from roof deck to top of parapet) and an
additional 16 ft for elevator overrun (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, in the Island
Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) / Medium High Density
Residential (MHDR) District under the provisions of Secs 2-404(F) and 2-1602(C). [Proposed
Use: Attached dwellings (15 dwelling units)] at 200 and 201 Skiff Point, Island Estates of
Clearwater, Unit 5-A, Lots 35-36. FLD2005-01012
3. K & P Clearwater Estate. LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval to modify the
location of an elevated pedestrian walkway over South Gulfview Blvd, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C (previously approved under Case
No. FLD2004-02013, approved by the Community Development Board on October 19,2004, for
a (1) Flexible Development application to Terminate the Status of a Nonconformity for density
within the Tourist District, under the provisions of Sec 6-109.C; (2) Flexible Development
application to permit 350 overnight accommodation units and 75 attached dwellings as a mixed
use (with increase in density of 250 hotel rooms from the Beach by Design density pool), with a
reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to building), a
reduction to the front (south along proposed Second St) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to building),
a reduction to the front (west and north along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to zero ft
(to building), an increase to the building height from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck) with an
additional 5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 33 ft for elevator, stair,
mechanical rooms/architectural embellishments (from roof deck), deviations to allow stacked
parking, allow access to a major arterial St and allow a building within the required sight
visibility triangles at the intersection of Coronado Dr and proposed Second St, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and to
\fJ(L~ 1110
eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Coronado Dr and proposed Second St, as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-l202.G; and (3) the vacation
of a portion the right-of-way for Gulfview Blvd between Coronado Dr and proposed Second St,
the vacation of the First St right-of-way between Coronado Dr and Gulfview Blvd, the dedication
of right-of-way for proposed Second St between Coronado Ave and Gulfview Blvd and the
dedication of right-of-way for Coronado Dr between proposed Second St and Gulfview Blvd).
(Proposed Use: Hotel of 350 rooms (127.78 rooms/acre), 75 attached dwellings (27.38
units/acre) and a maximum of 37,000 sq ft (0.31 FAR) of amenities accessory to the hotel, at a
height of 150 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and
an additional 33 ft for elevator, stair, mechanical rooms/architectural embellishments (from roof
deck) at 100 Coronado Dr and 201. 215 and 219 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner
Sub, Lots 44-55, 90-100, 102, and parts of lots 56 and 101, & Vac St and Columbia Sub Blk A.
FLD2004-02013A
G GTE Federal Credit Union is requesting Flexible Development approval to modify an
adopted condition of approval relating to hours of operation for a retail sales (financial services),
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1304.C
(previously approved under Case No. FLD2003-09047, approved by the Community
Development Board on December 16,2003, a Flexible Development application to permit retail
sales [financial services] with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial St [North
Belcher Rd], to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow
the use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1304.C). (Proposed Use: Credit Union) at 1750 North
Belcher Rd, Belcal Commercial Condo, Unit 1. FLD2003-09047A
5. Corbett Development. Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit offices
with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 20,000 sq ft to 14,810 sq ft, a reduction to the front
(west) setback from 20 ft to 15.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (south) setback from 20
ft to 10 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement),
reductions to the side (east) setback from 15 ft to 9 ft (to building and garage) and from 15 ft to 5
ft (to pavement) and to increase the size of an accessory garage structure from 10 percent to 15
percent of the gross floor area of the primary structure, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Secs 2-1304.C and 3-201. (Proposed Use: A two-story, 4,000
sq-ft office building with an accessory 600 sq-ft garage) at 1315 South Fort Harrison Ave,
Belleair, Blk 13, Lots 9-11 Incl & W 12 Vac Alley. FLD2005-02019
6. Power Le2al Advisory. Inc. is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 2
attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 15,000 sq ft to 9,486 sq ft, a
reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 70 ft and a deviation to permit parking that is
designed to back into the public right-of-way, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions
of Sec 2-404.F; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 2 lot subdivision, under the provisions of
Sec 4-702 (PLT2005-00005). (Proposed Use: 2 attached dwellings) at 111 Kenwood Ave, R.H.
Padgett's Estates Re Sub, Lot 10. FLD2005-02023
7. Spinecare Properties. LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 2 story,
45,000 sq ft medical clinic with non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density
Residential District under the provisions of Sec 2-204.C; a reduction to the front (west) setback
from 25 ft to 15 ft to pavement; a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 4 ft to
parking; and an increase in building height from 30 ft to 35 ft for top of parapet and to 43 ft for
elevator/stair tower; as a Comprehensive Infill Project, under the provisions of See 2-l204.A and
a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-l202.G. (Proposed Use:
Medical Clinic) at 3280 McMullen Booth Rd, Geiger Tract, Lot 1, & Sec 21-28-16, M&B 22.01.
FLD2005-01014
8. Four Seasons Development. LLC, (Pierre Cournoyer) are requesting Preliminary Plat
approval for 4 residential townhome lots to be called "Four Seasons Townhomes" as previously
approved under FLD2002-l2044. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 100 North Ladv
Mary Dr, Brookwood Terrace Revised, Blk 2, Lots 15-16 & part of Lot 14. PLT2005-00003
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or
objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file
written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the
hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with
respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings
and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,
which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per
Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall
be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates
that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence,
argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration
requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB.
An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public
hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and
spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB
shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the
Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be
available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL
33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about
the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
Michael Delk
Planning Director
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
A COpy OF TillS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN TillS
MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST.
Ad: 05-01-05
FLOdOO::> "0 ~CYlf]A
\150101 -e:,e-,cher~
ANDERSON, ROBERT 0 BEACH, CRAIG S
ANDERSON,ROWENA BEACH,SHERYLL
1724 RAGLAND AVE 1750 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
vJ~~l~
BELCAL COMMERCIAL CONDO
ASSN I
2040 NE COACHMAN RD
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614
BELCAL PROP
2040 NE COACHMAN RD
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614
BONIFACE, DOUGLAS L
BONIFACE, JEAN E
2212 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
BOULES, MICHAEL F
BOULES, ANSAF S
2201 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1613
BRONSON, RICHARD A
BRONSON, DAWN M
2200 S LAGOON CIR
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1606
BROWN, JOSEPH N
BROWN, DOROTHY L
1750 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
BUTLER, FREDERICK J
5900 SHORE BLVD S # 401
GULFPORT FL 33707 - 5933
CALABRESE, FRANK
1728 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
CARPENTER, RALPH A
CARPENTER, MARY A
1736 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
Clearvvater Neighborhoods Coalition
Doug Williams, President
2544 Frisco Dr
Clearvvater, FL 33761
CLEVELAND-OSCEOLA LLC
519 CLEVELAND ST STE 101
CLEARWATER FL 33755-
COE, JAY L
COE, DEBORAH L
1762 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
DISTRI
330 19TH AVE N STE 210
NASHVILLE TN 37203 - 2129
CROCKETT, ADDISON R
4029 E AMBERWOOD DR
PHOENIX AZ 85048 - 7474
CURRENT OWNER
2224 LAGOON CIR S
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1619
DEPCO PUMP CO INC
POBOX 7714
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 7714
DERZEKOS, CHRIS
1720 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
DOWNIN, ROBERT R
12000 CREEKBEND DR
RESTON VA 20194 - 5615
DURAVA,CHARLOTTE
1815 STETSON DR
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1422
EASTHAM, STEPHEN R
1711 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
ESTER, STEPHEN F
ESTER, RENDA K
1759 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
EVANS, ARTHUR C
1744 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
FLORIDA BLOOD SERVICES INC
PO BOX 22500
ST PETERSBURG, FL 33742 - 2500
Gerald A. Figurski Esq.
2550 Permit Place
Holiday, FL 34655
GRIDER, ANGELA M
GRIDER, JOEL 0
1734 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
GTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
711 S DALE MABRY HWY
TAMPA FL 33609 - 4408
HARRIS, SEAN
HARRIS, NASHUN
1716 MANOR AVE W
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
HEILMANN, FRANCIS J III
1758 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
.
HERRERA, JUSTIN HEUSINGER, CHERYL S HUBER, GAIL A
1741 W MANOR AVE 1754 W MANOR AVE HUBER, LAUREN
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 2216 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1612
JOHNSON, STEVEN F LA MASTRA, JOSEPH S LAWSON, JAMES R
JENKINS, PATTY A LA MASTRA, MARY LAWSON, SANDRA K
1728 W MANOR AVE 1733 W MANOR AVE 1754 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
MALlNOVIC, DRAGAN MAQUET, GORDON L MAXWELL, WALTER K
MALlNOVIC, MICA MAQUET, LORETTA MAXWELL, JERI S
1763 W MANOR AVE 1762 RAGLAND AVE 1740 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
MAYES, CHRISTY L MINIERI SEMINOLE INC NGUYEN, MANH V
1732 MANOR AVE W 29656 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 PHAM, LE ANH
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1729 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
PCM LLC PINELLAS COUNTY RUTZ, CHARLES J TRE
8310 S VALLEY HWY # 400 315 COURT ST RUTZ, JANET C TRE
ENGLEWOOD CO 80112- CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 2694 BRA TTLE LN
CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 1200
SCHNEIDER, ROLAND H TRE SHOWER, BARBARA A SIMPSON, BETTY L
1770 RAGLAND AVE SHOWER, DONNA A MC CRACKEN, DAVID
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635 1748 W MANOR AVE 2144 CALUMET ST
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1309
SISK, CHARLOTTE S SLACK, BARRY R SORENSEN, DONNA L
1740 RAGLAND AVE SLACK, CHRISTINE R 1732 RAGLAND AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635 1736 W MANOR AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1635
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610
TAYLOR, LOIS A THRAP, CHRISTOPHER E JR TIFFIN, JAY H TRE
1721 W MANOR AVE 1749 W MANOR AVE CATLIN, HELEN 0 TRUST
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 5 DESOTO PL
BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1021
TILLERY, BILLY G TORRE, ERMINDA F TRUSTEE CO TRE
1751 W MANOR DR 3076 GLENHURST AVE 119-80-1716 TRUST
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611 LOS ANGELES CA 90039 - 2319 PO BOX 466
DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0466
TUCKER, MARK L UNDERWOOD, BARBARA A USSERY, J C
TUCKER, LISA M 1724 W MANOR AVE USSERY, CAROL YN R
2201 S LAGOON CIR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1610 1944 REDBUD WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607 SEVIERVILLE TN 37876 - 0850
. ~ .
VAN SCOYOC, ROBERT
VAN SCOYOC, MARIL YNNE
1725 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
WICKMAN, CLIFFORD L JR
5900 SHORE BLVD S # 401
ST PETERSBURG FL 33707 - 5933
YOUSSEF, NABIL F
YOUSSEF, NADIA Z
1735 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 -1611
WALKER, BRIAN R
WALKER, JENNIFER M
2213 LAGOON CIR S
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1607
WALKER, JOSEPH 0
WALKER, BETTY L
2217 MANOR BLVD N
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1614
WOOD, JAMES E
WOOD, ELIZABETH A
1755 W MANOR AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1611
YOST, L MARTIN
YOST, ELISABETH A
1431 RIDGETOP WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1733
FLD2003-0904 7 A
1750 N Belcher Rd
\
C I T Y 0 F
CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAl SERVlCES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLA."iNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
May 18, 2005
Mr. Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire
2550 Permit Place
Holiday, FL 34655
RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2003-09047A
1750 North Belcher Road
Dear Mr. Figurski:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On May 17, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for
Flexible Development approval to modify an adopted condition of approval relating to hours of operation
for retail sales (financial services), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-1304.C (previously approved under Case No. FLD2003-09047, approved by the
Community Development Board on December 16, 2003, a Flexible Development application to permit
retail sales [financial services] with deviations to allow direct access to a major arterial street [North
Belcher Road], to allow the use as a permitted use and in a separate, primary building and to allow the
use to serve patrons beyond the industrial area, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Section 2-1304.C). The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the
applications with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Section 2-1304.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with and will not be detrimental to development/redevelopment
efforts of the surrounding area.
Conditions of Approval: (* Previously imposed under Case No. FLD2003-09047)
* 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
*2. That use of the building on the subject property be limited to a credit union. The applicant shall
record a covenant in the public records restricting the use of this building on the subj ect property, as
contained in this condition, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the credit union.
Any future change of use of this building to a bank shall require the following:
a. Construction plans be submitted and approved showing the installation of a left turn lane
of adequate storage length, according to City and Florida Department of Transportation
design standards, on Calumet Street at North Belcher Road. Construction of this
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
May 18, 2005
Figurski - Page Two
improvement must be completed prior to the issuance of an Occupational License for the
bank;
b. Establishment of an escrow account with the City, prior to the issuance of an
Occupational License for the bank, for the future construction of a traffic signal light at
the intersection of North Belcher Road and Calumet Street, if warranted by a Traffic
Signal Warrant Study. The funds in the escrow account will be a shared portion of the
full cost of a traffic signal light. The City's shared portion shall not exceed 50 percent of
the full cost. If, in the event that a traffic signal light is not warranted based on the
Study, funds will be refunded to the applicant.
*3. That revised landscape plans be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits for
the proposed credit union reflecting Code foundation plantings;
*4. That outdoor lighting fixtures be integrated into the landscape site design to avoid shielding of the
lighting by tree canopy; and
*5. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be designed according to a common theme
including similar style, color, material and other characteristics to provide a sense of uniformity.
Freestanding signage shall be limited to monument-style, not to exceed six feet in height.
Submission of a Comprehensive Sign Program is required for more than one freestanding sign on
either street frontage.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (May 17, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within
one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive
owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to
exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may
approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to
initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 1, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner 1lI, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
S.incer. el.y~ .. ... "
~-o
~~~...
Mic~~L lCP
Planning Director
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslBelcher N 1750 GTE Federal Credit Union (IRT) -
ApprovedlBelcher N 1750 Development Order #2 5.18. 05.doc