FLD2002-10034
. .
; Clearwater
o~
~
.
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 7"0-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
CAS #: '- FL.-V Z-O Q 1- - I 00'31-
DATE RECEIVED: ~ '?! \ Cz...
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): wvJ
ATLAS PAGE #: 2-4-9 f2,
ZONING DISTRICT: Lt'\1' L
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: '~\J
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PRO~IEt
~g~i~~ ~~\t ~~
WEST: Lt'\tJ,L \'L~
EAST: . 'P f
, .
Cl SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
Cl SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
-
Cl SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 2-0 O. 111) tJj/~
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
(Revised 08/30/01)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME:
fete.v J .
MAILING ADDRESS: 8 L{ q Ho.. r /o~ r
PHONE NUMBER: (7.2..7) 447- 6l{O/
Pet e r
HuV\t
Is Ja.lI\ rJ C leco"l.J~tey 3s1b7
J
FAX NUMBER: (j.1... -,) L.{ 4 7- b Lf D Cf
tJUV1t
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
~ l:LWl e So
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
8~cr H.a..r.bf)}- .{Ja.lrIJ C/ear-t...n.fer FL 33767
) I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: kt 'i'f, UL1 ;f.; 6~ 7A/ 7C. Is..Ia.~~ E6Mes pla.-t- /3ook i 4, B, l~2..
PARCEL NUMBER: ~I PO-reel::t:t u~--2.9-IS- 43t.{s-t -~73-()'-ILjlJ
PARCEL SIZE: II, ~ 7 S Sr-- ~-\- O. .2- ~ O~c...\-t..
(acres, $quare feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): C l> S V\.
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square foota
STREET ADDRESS:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): e I"Y\ L V\CC C S:(~'\~
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction In required number of pa g sp8ces, specific USl!:!!tcJ..~'d , ,
CLftcv:1.g c2 IdeV')
DOES THIS APPUCATlON INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVElOPMENT RIO";"S (fDfl), A PRI;VIOUS~PPj>tD Pf...~...= D UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO L (if yes h IOC. , . Iicable documents
r-- <'
. I- i'
Ie I;
, <
.
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
~SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSU
UClr Y'a~ D e
PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
D Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located. L J, IJ C Ii I
5 ~ nJ Ie r.::t.~; 1 hi'll" e wa..~ rr:::"i E'lVeof ,OV" COdL~ co~f v4l1ce
t<) Yl Ju'1 7, I OJ ~ B dh cQ fOP rh-) ("tte& w; +~ a Yl-\.ltu Mu~ c) ~
Y'C' lea. h. vet v If/ C (!"" . G. It.sfrve5
pttX:~etO~ as pey- p ltl.V\s. See. o.---t-t corY 01- f a.h.S W'lt-~ ~et b.k.1.ey . th f1
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significant~ (L +- B ~
impair the value thereof. s' l (" f I ,. . I -L ~ l 9 t"C1 8 ~ ,:(~t> )
I tV4 _~ r~ [' Y k:kl'J 1">-\<::' I!?U LLI L h. -&,
j /
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use. <;. ; V; Ie r-zJ...~" 7 kb I?-\. eo h () ,.l + l h. I Cfq j:;
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
51 "j Ie
k""",,' Lv
(
h6Yk-€
~i- iL,. ICfQA
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Si~lc-- F-A.~I~JI hfl~€' bu;lt In. {'iqR
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
S i / Ie
fa-'~; [y
I
h.o h).e
ht-'i If
l ~
199R
D Address the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate
sheets as necessary):
IV 0 T If.f) 4J J t'caJ / e
f ,
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
, .
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One~al and 12 copies;
COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; -Iv' of' tI f1/?~tdi:le ~
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required; - J/of-~I ~d-e.
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ., I ·
o
o
o
o
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.) -1II{)f-tll'/'t~
GRADING PLAN, as applicable; Mil.' ~
o
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) -tJt:IlJpe Ni5i7Jtf 8J1YI'H)-
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: ~ ~120m~
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; r'(I'IL A. . I
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; < :rrJ?n'1 1~tJtt<...
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
~
Page 3 of 6 - Aexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
'j.
.1
.
G. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
o
jtldfP/f/;(/:fl:le -~h()me &(/tP~
ORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
xisting topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o ' J'J COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
IV" (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o tfj COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL RJQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN: ;VA - WI~J1'f5rh()~
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
J
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) A1J)';
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and
~t a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o UILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materia is;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
1/Jt:J1QLe
ntown Districts) or as part
J. SI NAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) J/ora,t7j1l;tdJ;ie
o omprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) )/?11-a;1J/iCII/l1e
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
~
'( .
.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS t7 d
subscribed before _ mJl this ~ day of
, A.D. 20~ to me and/or by
"'A wl)o is p rsonally known has
produced p~/j as
identification.
,~"C,1>..~ri-',;;:". B' ARA J. WHITING
~.t~":'f~ MY COMMISSIO', ~ CC 793996
~~~~t~ EXPIRES' November 30,2002
"I "'Hf.J~\'" Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwnters
"
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearwater
J
.
.
1
M. AFFID~VIT. TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
~er ..\. I-(u vt"
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
A4q HctrboY" I~/QVl('}J "J>;!tlMJ E~+~it-e$:'i Ck=dYlut:J.+ey 3376/
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
TeYWtL V\.a+ioV\. D ~ ~Dlt\ C~V1 FDY'lA1L it
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6.
That (I1we), the "ode..;'.... ,,'homy, he..by re"" that the to...,o;" ;, lNe ,"d ~ '1 ~
P""",rty """... J'.~
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINatAS
My Commission Expires:
.",~~~.~:'f~;;", BARBARA J. WHITING
f:rd1"~:~ MY COMMISSIO': # CC 793996
;~:.~.~f EXPIRES: November 30, 2002
~1,~,9~,~~~"" Bonded Thru Notary Public UnderNriters
~
day of
who having been first duly sworn
01/ I<;
~eif me the Und%ed, an officer duly commissioned b~ of th~at~ F!<?r\d}l, on this
~ . ~personally appeared If.. J. t//'JT
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signe
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development application. doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application - City of Clearw ater
_, . . . 1 .
.
.
To: Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
~'":"--.'\""""":'""'>.
...--
,
From: Peter J. Hunt
849 Harbor Island, Island Estates
Clearwater, FL 33767
phone: (727) 447-6409
pi ,.~, " _,;." ....""1'
C~~'.'..J'; '-.~=-f\:",'lVATER
Date: October 7, 2002
Subject:
FLEXIBLE DEVELOP:MENT APPLICATION
It is the suggestion of Cynthia H. Tarapani, Planning Director, and with her support
that I request a Termination of Nonconformance of my home at 849 Harbor Island,
Island Estates, Clearwater, Florida 33767.
In 1998 I added a substantial wing to my house. In securing my building permit I
followed the City's requirements to the letter. From the beginning of the project my
directive to my architect, Kenneth Rejko, my designer, Joyce Fuller, and my builder,
Ray Jay Construction, was to design and build everything to code and without any
need to request a variance. That was done. As you will observe on the last page of
this application on July 8, 1998 my building plans were reviewed for code compliance
by the City of Clearwater and stamped as requiring a minimum of 15 feet rear
setback. The house was completed as permitted and without variances.
I have recently learned that the City made an error in permitting me to build 18.5 feet
from my rear property line and that my house is consequently considered a
nonconformance. My greatest concern is that I have committed considerable expense
building steel support anchors 30 feet into the ground and designing the house around
them. Should my house be seriously damaged (more than 50%) through_Jir~or.storm
I would not be permitted to rebuild. Considering I made every effoqin( gp~ rf)1t~;!p
comply with all building codes and believed my financial investment 'was'aprudenf .
one, I request the City grant me termination of nonconformance. 'it OCT 2 ~ 2002
PJH/ sl
SinCe~y,. ~'-""I~:"...,..,......,.
? '" .'
~ - .......
Peter J. Hunt .
FILE
~
~ ft.
: I' ,
-: I ':
Ii ! i
jl ~ I
II \: i
;: iJ '
\L.__~/ :.
\
.;
" ::vC:j.
1. VJ.\..l.lJ...LV J.
HI\I~l\.al~ 1 I l)l~LU l,Jl.illULtII) IIHIIl,1
',l
I-
executive line
.
890~J0891
.
1/ I
OR 6 9 l.~ 6 PG 2 0 I i/
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY
THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY:
. ,
KIMPTON & BURKE, P.A.
2901 U. S HWY. 19 NORTH. SUITE 203
CLEARWATER, FL 34G21
(The terms "grantor" and "grantee" herein shall be construed
to include all genders and singular or plural as the context indicates.)
1600153]
01
RECORDING
DOC STANPS
PAL
03-01-,39
17=ro=nJ...
I ;. _" ~ " ~!...r
bi~ Jnbtnturt,
,1
...
$6.00
$2, 750s00
..,
David W. Smith and
Anna E. Smith, his wife
of the County of P inellas
Peter J. Hunt, a single man
Social Security No( s)
l"'f"U:'!\lr~ .
2l6-30:.:!f~ '3
110-30-0950
, grantor, and
$'; 7r;./-. nn
t ))r,~;thn
~..-t: ..iUt; 'l..l..'
~O.OO
Made this of g1:L
day of February
CHEer\
--....L
fill~ .
. i.J.:, :I
(I\ ~.J.Q ft6"'in1= t:ii=Ti ·
;frri~ 'f~t\'-':-l''--''L
, State of Florida
Social Security No( s)
849 Harbor Island, Clearwater, Florida 34630
whose post office address is
of the County of P inellas , State of Florida , grantee,
lIlitntSSttl): That said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and no /100 - - - - - Dollars, and
other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever,
the following described land, situate, lJing and being in P inellas County, Florida, to-wit:
"
Lot 44, ISLAND ESTATES OF CLEARWATER UNIT 7C, according to the
plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 64, Pages 1 and 2, Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Subject to covenants, restrictions, reservations, easements of
record, and taxes for the year 1989 and subsequent years.
"'I
-'
rzE;;
rl ~ ;:?,.-:3??:~~
,. ~x l'. 11.....
Ocrttmpntary ,. , . ' '.. T-v ~,l
~.,:J
. i-I'"
II FORM 135 Flo,;d. BILL OF SALE, A.E.
..... execu tive line
.
]Qutlll,.MlDltn1l1!1htllt~S ,
JJ'"herev,,~ rued herein, eM term "party" ,hall inclu.cU eM Mir., perlonal ,.eprelen-tativ~"
,rucellO,., a.nd I or U,i,,,, of tM re.pecRve partiell IuJreto; the rue of the Ilintular numbe,.
,1UUl ;".ZwU tM plum, and tM plural the .i"I'<14r; the Ult of a"y tender shall i"clude
aUten-de,.,; a.nd, illUed, tM term unou" ,hall inclr.uh aU the nates /u,.ein de,cribed if more
than one
That
David W. Smith and Anna E. Smith, his wife
of the City of Clearwater , in the COllnty of, Pine;Llas .,
and State of Florida , of the first part, for and ~n cons~deratwn oj the
sum of Ten and O. V. C. ----------------------------------------- Dollars,
lawful money of the United States, to him paid by
~eter J. Hunt, a single man
of 849 Harbor Island, Clearwater, Florida 34630 , party of the second
part, the reoeipt whereof is hereby acknowtedged, nas granted, bargained, sold, trans-
ferred and delivered, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, transfer and
deliver unto the said party of the second part, the following good.~ and chattels,
electric garage door opener, water softener, refrigerator,
range/oven, microwave, dishwasher, disposal, washer/dryer,
pool equipment, storm shutters, security system, jennaire,
all decorator valances, cornices, sheers & verticle blinds,
accordian shades, two pillows in living room that match
window treatments, master bedroom bedspread matches window
treatments, and bar stools in kitchen; personal property all
of which is located in the premises commonly known as:
849 Harbor Island, Clearwater, Florida 34630.
wn )tnnt null tn ){nlll the same unto the said party of the second part
forever,
FILE
Receipt #: 1200200000000015940
Date: 10/24/2002
10/24/2002
3:38:24PM
Line Items:
Case No
Tran Code
Description
Revenue Account No
Amount Paid
FLD2002-10034
04
Flexible Residential (SFR)
010-341262
Line Item Total:
200.00
$200.00
Payments:
Method
Payer
Bank No
Account No
ConfIrm No
How Received
Amount Paid
Check
PETER J HUNT TRUSTEE UA
780
In Person
$~~
Payment Total:
"
~
;-
m
.
Page I of I
cReceipt.rpt
.
.
~~~
~,~
~.~ ,),/ i . ~~. .
~c-:a -;:- -' '5C~
~~~ ~
~~#~~
~~.P~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
January 28,2003
Mr. Peter J. Hunt
849 Harbor Island
Clearwater, FL 33767
RE: Development Order - Case FLD2002-1 0034 - 849 Harbor Island
Dear Mr. Hunt:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On January 21, 2003, the Community Development Board reviewed your
application to terminate the status of a nonconforming structure to permit an 18.5 feet rear
waterfront (east) setback where a 25 feet setback is required within the LMDR, Low Medium
Density Residential District, under the provisions of Section 6-109. The Community
Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria to terminate the status of a
nonconforming structure per Section 6-109.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any
building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance
of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when
applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated
pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days
of the date of the CDB. decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect
of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case
expires on February 4,2003.
BRIAN], AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
e
January 28,2003
Hunt - Page 2
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner
at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our
website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
~~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
IIMS5clPDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX\lnactive or Finished ApplicationslHarbor Island 849 Hunt - ApprovedlHarbor Island 849
Development Order. doc
C. CONSENT AGENDA - (It! .
..
1. Case: FLD 02-04-09A - 1215 North Betty Lane Level Two Application
Owner: Homeless Emergency Project, Inc.
Applicant: Barbara Green.
Location: 0.35 acre located on the east side of North Betty Lane, across from Engman Street.
Atlas Page: 269B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development application as a revision to a previously approved Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project (FLD 02-04-09) for a residential shelter in the Commercial District, with
reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to stairwell) and
from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to
building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under
the provisions of Section 2-704.B.
Proposed Use: Residential shelter of eight units.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
ACTION: APPROVED -7:0 WITH CONDITIONS: 1) That any change in ownership on Site A (retail
thrift store) be evaluated for complementary operational characteristics and parking demand, and
may require approval by COB (Community Development Board)*; 2) That the landscape plan for
Site C be amended to include a hedge along the north and east sides of the parking lot in the
northeast corner of the property, to the satisfaction of Staff, prior to the issuance of any permits
for Site C improvements*; 3) That any existing or future dumpsters on either Sites A, B or C be
located, designed, properly enclosed and constructed in accordance with City standards*; 4) That
the color of proposed buildings be consistent with existing buildings and be approved by City
staff prior to the issuance of building permits for those buildings*; 5) That all signage meet Code,
including the removal/redesign of any existing nonconforming signs, through building permits
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the applicable site*; and 6) That any change
to this site, due to the proposed development of the property to the south, be included in any
application for that parcel. (Note: * indicates conditions previously imposed under
Case FLD 02-04-09.)
2. Case: FLD2002-1 0034 - 849 Harbor Island Level Two Application
Owner/Applicant: Peter Hunt.
Location: 0.26-acre located on the east side of Harbor Island, approximately 500 feet from the
terminus of Harbor Island.
Atlas Page: 249B.
Zoning: LMDR/IENCOD, Low Medium Density Residential District/Island Estates Neighborhood
Conservation Overlay District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to terminate the status of a nonconforming structure to permit
an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot setback is required,
under the provisions of Section 6-109.
Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot rear setback to building.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
ACTION: APPROVED - 7:0
acdb1202
3
12/17/02
.
.
~\A. LOF~.~~.
yg
~..~-~/~ ~""
~ - ~~
.~ -==- f ~l
~.lf4TE~ ~)~
~~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
January 2,2003
Mr. Peter J. Hunt
849 Harbor Island
Clearwater, FL 33767
RE: Community Development Board Meeting (FLD2002-l 0034)
Dear Mr. Hunt:
The Flexible Development application to Terminate the Status of a Nonconforming Structure to
permit an 18.5 feet rear waterfront (east) setback where a 25 feet setback is required within the
LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, under the provisions of Section 6-109 for
property located at 849 Harbor Island was reviewed and approved by the Community
Development Board on December 17, 2002. However, due to an advertising error, this case
must be reheard by the Community Development Board. This rehearing has been
scheduled for January 21, 2003. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
W~\'-L M. W&t,
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
\ IMS5cIPDSIP/anning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglHarbor Is/and 849 Hunt - ApprovedlHarbor Is/and 849
BRIAN Y .AuJiM1F?m~~C~(}.IISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICIi J\1AYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
December 2, 2002
Mr. Peter J. Hunt
849 Harbor Island
Clearwater, FL 33767
RE: Community Development Board Meeting (FLD2002-l 0034)
Dear Mr. Hunt:
The Flexible Development application to Terminate the Status of a Nonconforming Structure to
permit an 18.5 feet rear waterfront (east) setback where a 25 feet setback is required within the
LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, under the provisions of Section 6-109 for
property located at 849 Harbor Island has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community
Development Board on December 17, 2002.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall
at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
WlW,\,,"_ M.,\,;)~
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
\IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglHarbor Island 849 Hunt\Harbor Island 849 CDB
Letter.doc
BRIAN J .,AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
'"
.
.
~~~
l~~~
.~...Q..l."~~, ~...
~_ _ ~rlJ'l '_!III
",""'- = ~li!
..Co;. === ~.~
..~~':. -=- ~ ~
-:'~~~~P'~~~"~
~~Wbf'~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
October 29,2002
Mr. Peter J. Hunt
849 Harbor Island
Clearwater, Florida 33767
RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to Terminate the Status of a
Nonconforming Structure to permit an 18.5 feet rear waterfront (east) setback where a 25
feet is required within the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, under the
provisions of Section 6-109 (FLD2002-10034, 849 Harbor Island).
Dear Mr. Hunt:
The Planning staff has reviewed your Flexible Development application approval to Terminate
the Status of a Nonconforming Structure to permit an 18.5 feet rear waterfront (east) setback
where a 25 feet is required within the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, under
the provisions of Section 6-109 at 849 Harbor Island. After a preliminary review of the submitted
documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The application has been
entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2002-10034.
The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on November
14, 2002, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the
Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the
approximate time that your case will be reviewed.
You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application.
BRIAN J AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FIW\K HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFnRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
r----------
I
.
.
October 29,2002
Hunt - Page Two
Please be aware that 15 additional sets ofthe complete resubmittal of all required information, to
include copies of the application, survey, site plan, cover letter, etc. will be required by
November 15,2002, in order to be placed on the December 17,2002, Community Development
Board (CDB) agenda.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely yours,
I ,
L. ) '. ,tv\ \ "1 r)
vV (Ai" (~, . --J (xX.~
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
Senior Planner
I IMS5c\PDSIPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXiPending cases \ Up for the next DRCIHarbor Island 849 HuntlHarbor Island 849 Complete
Letter. doc
.
.
CDB Meeting Date: January 21. 2003
Case Number: FLD2002-10034
Agenda Item: Dl
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
UPDATE: This case was heard and approved at the December 17, 2002, Community
Development Board meeting. Due to an advertising error, this case must be reheard by the
Community Development Board.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:
Mr. Peter J. Hunt
LOCATION:
849 Harbor Island
REQUEST:
Terminate the status of a nonconforming structure to permit an 18.5
feet rear waterfront (east) setback where a 25 feet setback is required
within the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, under
the provisions of Section 6-109.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site survey submitted by Peter J. Hunt
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.26 acres; 11,375 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
Site is approximately 79 feet wide by 140 feet deep
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single-family dwelling
Single-family dwelling
PLAN CATEGORY:
RU, Residential Urban Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, with IENCOD,
Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family dwelling
West: Single-family dwelling
East: Water
South: Single-family dwelling
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21, 2003 - Case FLD2002-1 0034
Page 1
.
.
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The site is 0.26 acres located on the east side of Harbor Island, approximately 2,700 feet north of
Harbor Passage. It is located within a neighborhood dominated by single-family dwellings. The
site was developed in 1980 with a single-family dwelling. A two-story addition to the rear of the
house was constructed in 1998 at an 18.5-foot rear/waterfront setback, where a 25-foot setback
was required. The project included major renovation of the rear portion of the existing house and
the addition of the two-story portion, which included a portion over the existing house. The permit
was issued in error. The structure has been deemed nonconforming by the Planning Department.
The Code requires, under the provisions of Section 6-102.F., that, "in the event a nonconforming
structure is destroyed or damaged to 50 percent or more of the assessed value, the structure may be
repaired or restored only if the structure and the use conforms to the standards of the development
code for the zoning district in which it is located."
The applicant has applied for Termination of Status as a Nonconformity to allow reconstruction at
the existing 18.5 rear/waterfront setback in the future event the structure is damaged or destroyed
to 50 percent or more of its assessed value. The addition was designed and constructed with steel
rods augered to a depth of 30 feet (bedrock) and anchored for improved structural support. In the
event of damage or destruction, replacement construction would be required to meet the 25-foot
setback. If this 25- foot setback was enforced, it would not allow for the full utilization of the in-
place structural improvements.
A review of Development Orders issued in the immediate area (Harbor Island) has identified that
two previous Development Orders have been granted for reduced rear/waterfront setbacks. On
May 26, 2000, a Development Order (FLS 00-03-18) was issued to reduce the rear/waterfront
setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, for an addition to a single-family dwelling at 860 Harbor Island for
Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. On August 9, 2001, a Development Order (FLS 01-05-37) was issued to
reduce the rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 18 feet, for ai, 1 04 square foot swimming pool
at 673 Harbor Island for Mr. and Mrs. Ed Capone.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-201):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 7.5 du/acre One dwelling unit One dwelling unit Yes
IMPERVIOUS 0.65 0.51 0.51 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (lSR)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10034
Page 2
.
.
B. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR DETACHED DWELLINGS IN THE LMDR, LOW
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-202):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT SIZE 5,000 square feet 11,375 square 11,375 square feet Yes
(minimum) feet
LOT WIDTH 50 feet 79 feet 79 feet Yes
(minimum)
HEIGHT 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING 2 spaces per unit 2 spaces 2 spaces Yes
SPACES (min)
FRONT 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Yes
SETBACK
SIDE Five feet North: 7.7 feet North: 7.7 feet Yes
SETBACK South: 6.2 feet South: 6.2 feet
REAR 25 feet 18.5 feet 18.5 feet No
SETBACK
C. TERMINATION OF STATUS AS A NONCONFORMITY CRITERIA (Section 6-109
[CD:
1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(D) shall be
installed.
There are no specific perimeter buffer requirements for single-family dwellings under
Section 3-1202(D).
2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards
established in Section 3-1202(E).
There is no specific requirement for landscaping of the driveway for a single-family
dwelling.
3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory
use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with
this development code.
This criterion is not applicable, as the site does not have signs, accessory structures or
lighting that are nonconforming.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10034
Page 3
e
e
4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to
satisfy the requirements of this section.
The criterion is not applicable.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The site has been developed with a single-family dwelling since 1980, according to the
County Property Appraiser's office. The applicant constructed a two-story addition to the
rear of the house in 1998 at 18.5-foot rear/waterfront setback. The required rear/waterfront
setback is 25 feet. The applicant is requesting a Termination of Status as Nonconformity to
allow reconstruction of the house with the same 18.5-foot setback, in the event of the house
being destroyed by fire, wind, etc. more than 50 percent of its assessed value.
A review of Development Orders issued in the immediate area (Harbor Island) has
identified that two previous Development Orders have been granted for reduced
rear/waterfront setbacks. On May 26, 2000, a Development Order (FLS 00-03-18) was
issued to reduce the rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, for an addition to a
single-family dwelling at 860 Harbor Island for Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. On August 9,
2001, a Development Order (FLS 01-05-37) was issued to reduce the rear/waterfront
setback from 25 feet to 18 feet, for ai, 1 04 square foot swimming pool at 673 Harbor
Island for Mr. and Mrs. Ed Capone.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is currently developed with a single-family dwelling. Surrounding properties are
similar in size to the subject site and have also been developed with single-family
dwellings. Surrounding properties should not be negatively impacted by this proposal.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The use is not changing with this application. The site has been developed with a single-
family dwelling since 1980, with the addition built in 1998. The site is developed similar
to surrounding properties. The proposal should not affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working within the surrounding neighborhood.
Staff Report - Conununity Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10034
Page 4
.
.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Traffic will not be affected by this request.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The surrounding properties are developed with single-family dwellings on similarly-sized
lots. The existing dwelling is consistent with the standards of the community character of
the immediate vicinity.
A review of Development Orders issued in the immediate area (Harbor Island) has
identified that two previous Development Orders have been granted for reduced
rear/waterfront setbacks. On May 26, 2000, a Development Order (FLS 00-03-18) was
issued to reduce the rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, for an addition to a
single-family dwelling at 860 Harbor Island for Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. On August 9,
2001, a Development Order (FLS 01-05-37) was issued to reduce the rear/waterfront
setback from 25 feet to 18 feet, for aI, 1 04 square foot swimming pool at 673 Harbor
Island for Mr. and Mrs. Ed Capone.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The existing setback creates no conflicts with the required view triangles along the water.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
November 14, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for a Termination of
the Status of a Nonconforming Structure to permit an 18.5 feet rear/waterfront setback where a 25
feet setback is required within the Low Medium Density Residential District under the provisions
of Section 6-109.C for the site at 849 Harbor Island, with the following bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria to terminate the status of a
nonconforming structure per Section 6-109.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10034
Page 5
.
.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
I IMS5c\PDS\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXlPending caseslReviewed and PendinglHarbor Island 849 Hunt - Approved\Harbor Island 849
Staff Report 1.21.03 CDB.doc
Staff Report- Community Development Board- January 21,2003 - Case FLD2002-10034
Page 6
-
View looking east at front of house
View looking south at rear of house
View looking northwest at house
849 Harbor Island
FLD2002-10034
e
View looking south at rear of house
....! _..-,
~
-,
View looking north at rear of house
r -,~ -.
View looking southwest at house
Owner:
e
e
LOCATION MAP
Peter Hunt
FLD2002- 10034
Case:
Property Size
(Acres):
0.26
Site:
849 Harbor Island
PIN:
OS/29/15/43456/073/0440
A tlas Page:
249B
Owner.
Peter Hunt
Case:
FLD2002- 1 0034
Site:
849 Harbor Island
Property Size
(Acres):
0.26
PIN:
OS/29/15/43456/073/0440
Atlas Page:
249B
1---
p
824
819
81
813
812
~
807
80
ZONING MAP
Owner:
Peter Hunt
Case:
Site:
849 Harbor Island
Property Size
(Acres):
PIN:
A tlas Page:
p
FLD2002- 10034
0.26
OS/29/15/43456/073/0440
249B
81
813
812
~
807
EXISTING SURROUNDING USES
Owner. Peter Hunt Case: FLD2002.; 10034
Site: 849 Harbor Island Property 0.26 J
Size (Acres):
PIN: OS/29/15/43456/073/044
0
A tlas Page: 249B
-
e
FILE toP'
CDB Meeting Date: December 17. 2002
Case Number: FLD2002-10034
Agenda Item: C3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:
Mr. Peter J. Hunt
LOCATION:
849 Harbor Island
REQUEST:
Terminate the status of a nonconforming structure to permit an 18.5
feet rear waterfront (east) setback where a 25 feet setback is required
within the LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, under
the provisions of Section 6-109.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site survey submitted by Peter J. Hunt
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.26 acres; 11,375 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
Site is approximately 79 feet wide by 140 feet deep
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single-family dwelling
Single-family dwelling
PLAN CATEGORY:
RU, Residential Urban Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District, with IENCOD,
Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family dwelling
West: Single-family dwelling
East: Water
South: Single-family dwelling
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-1 0034
-
e
ANALYSIS:
The site is 0.26 acres located on the east side of Harbor Island, approximately 2,700 feet north of
Harbor Passage. It is located within a neighborhood dominated by single-family dwellings. The
site was developed in 1980 with a single-family dwelling. A two-story addition to the rear of the
house was constructed in 1998 at an 18.5-foot rear/waterfront setback, where a 25-foot setback
was required. The project included major renovation of the rear portion of the existing house and
the addition of the two-story portion, which included a portion over the existing house. The permit
was issued in error. The structure has been deemed nonconforming by the Planning Department.
The Code requires, under the provisions of Section 6-102.F., that, "in the event a nonconforming
structure is destroyed or damaged to 50 percent or more of the assessed value, the structure may be
repaired or restored only if the structure and the use conforms to the standards of the development
code for the zoning district in which it is located."
The applicant has applied for Termination of Status as a Nonconformity to allow reconstruction at
the existing 18.5 rear/waterfront setback in the future event the structure is damaged or destroyed
to 50 percent or more of its assessed value. The addition was designed and constructed with steel
rods augered to a depth of 30 feet (bedrock) and anchored for improved structural support. In the
event of damage or destruction, replacement construction would be required to meet the 25-foot
setback. If this 25-foot setback was enforced, it would not allow for the full utilization of the in-
place structural improvements.
A review of Development Orders issued in the immediate area (Harbor Island) has identified that
two previous Development Orders have been granted for reduced rear/waterfront setbacks. On
May 26, 2000, a Development Order (FLS 00-03-18) was issued to reduce the rear/waterfront
setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, for an addition to a single-family dwelling at 860 Harbor Island for
Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. On August 9,2001, a Development Order (FLS 01-05-37) was issued to
reduce the rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 18 feet, for aI, 104 square foot swimming pool
at 673 Harbor Island for Mr. and Mrs. Ed Capone.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-201):
STANDARD REQillRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 7.5 du/acre One dwelling unit One dwelling unit Yes
IMPERVIOUS 0.65 0.51 0.51 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-1 0034
2
e
e
B. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR DETACHED DWELLINGS IN THE LMDR, LOW
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-202):
STANDARD REQillREDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
LOT SIZE 5,000 square feet 11,375 square 11,375 square feet Yes
(minimum) feet
LOT WIDTH 50 feet 79 feet 79 feet Yes
(minimum)
HEIGHT 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING 2 spaces per unit 2 spaces 2 spaces Yes
SPACES (min)
FRONT 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Yes
SETBACK
SIDE Fi ve feet North: 7.7 feet North: 7.7 feet Yes
SETBACK South: 6.2 feet South: 6.2 feet
REAR 25 feet 18.5 feet 18.5 feet No
SETBACK
C. TERMINATION OF STATUS AS A NONCONFORMITY CRITERIA (Section 6-109
[CD:
1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(D) shall be
installed.
There are no specific perimeter buffer requirements for single-family dwellings under
Section 3-1202(D).
2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards
established in Section 3-1202(E).
There is no specific requirement for landscaping of the driveway for a single-family
dwelling.
3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory
use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with
this development code.
This criterion is not applicable, as the site does not have signs, accessory structures or
lighting that are nonconforming.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-1 0034
3
e
e
4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to
satisfy the requirements of this section.
The criterion is not applicable.
C. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The site has been developed with a single-family dwelling since 1980, according to the
County Property Appraiser's office. The applicant constructed a two-story addition to the
rear of the house in 1998 at 18.5-foot rear/waterfront setback. The required rear/waterfront
setback is 25 feet. The applicant is requesting a Termination of Status as Nonconformity to
allow reconstruction of the house with the same 18.5-foot setback, in the event of the house
being destroyed by fire, wind, etc. more than 50 percent of its assessed value.
A review of Development Orders issued in the immediate area (Harbor Island) has
identified that two previous Development Orders have been granted for reduced
rear/waterfront setbacks. On May 26, 2000, a Development Order (FLS 00-03-18) was
issued to reduce the rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, for an addition to a
single-family dwelling at 860 Harbor Island for Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. On August 9,
2001, a Development Order (FLS 01-05-37) was issued to reduce the rear/waterfront
setback from 25 feet to 18 feet, for a 1,104 square foot swimming pool at 673 Harbor
Island for Mr. and Mrs. Ed Capone.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is currently developed with a single-family dwelling. Surrounding properties are
similar in size to the subject site and have also been developed with single-family
dwellings. Surrounding properties should not be negatively impacted by this proposal.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The use is not changing with this application. The site has been developed with a single-
family dwelling since 1980, with the addition built in 1998. The site is developed similar
to surrounding properties. The proposal should not affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working within the surrounding neighborhood.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-1 0034
4
e
e
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Traffic will not be affected by this request.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The surrounding properties are developed with single-family dwellings on similarly-sized
lots. The existing dwelling is consistent with the standards of the community character of
the immediate vicinity.
A review of Development Orders issued in the immediate area (Harbor Island) has
identified that two previous Development Orders have been granted for reduced
rear/waterfront setbacks. On May 26, 2000, a Development Order (FLS 00-03-18) was
issued to reduce the rear/waterfront setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, for an addition to a
single-family dwelling at 860 Harbor Island for Arthur and Jeanne Abbo. On August 9,
2001, a Development Order (FLS 01-05-37) was issued to reduce the rear/waterfront
setback from 25 feet to 18 feet, for aI, 104 square foot swimming pool at 673 Harbor
Island for Mr. and Mrs. Ed Capone.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The existing setback creates no conflicts with the required view triangles along the water.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
November 14, 2002. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for a Termination of
the Status of a Nonconforming Structure to permit an 18.5 feet rear/waterfront setback where a 25
feet setback is required within the Low Medium Density Residential District under the provisions
of Section 6-109.C for the site at 849 Harbor Island, with the following bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria to terminate the status of a
nonconforming structure per Section 6-109.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code, including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-1 0034
5
I
e
e
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEXlPending cases\Reviewed and PendingViarbor Island 849 HunNlarbor Island 849 Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 17, 2002 - Case FLD2002-1 0034
6
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-10034
849 HARBOR ISL
11 /27/2002
5:20:l8PM
,
Amendment Application
Received
FLDD070 Traffic Eng Review I 0/24/200~ 11/8/2002 None DONE CM 11/8/2002 No Traffic Engineering concerns.
CM
FLDD080 Engineering Review 1 0/24/200~ 11/8/2002 None DONE MEL l1/l2/200~
MTP
.
FLDA245 Documents attached in 1 0/24/200~ None 1 0/24/200~
PPlan WW
FLDA235 Letter To Abutting Prop 1 0/24/200~ l1/l2/200~ None DONE MTP l1/l2/200~ n/a
Owner MTP
FLDA230 Letter of Completeness 1 0/24/200~ None 1 0/24/200~
WW
FLDA244 D.O. Mailed Out 1 0/24/200~ None 1 0/24/200~
WW
FLDA018 Tree Survey Recd 1 0/24/200~ HwO 1 0/24/200~
WW .
FLDA 130 Map Created 1 0/24/200~ None 1 0/24/200~
WW
FLDA016 Drainage Calculation 1 0/24/200~ ll!12/200~ HwO DONE MTP ll!12/200~ n/a
Recd MTP
FLDA015 Verify Traffic Impact 1 0/24/200~ HwO 1 0/24/200~
Fees WW
Page 1 of3
CaseActivity..rpt
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-10034
849 HARBOR ISL
11/27/2002
5:20:18PM
.
FLDD060 Legal Review I 0/24/200~ 11/12/200~ None DONE MTP 11/12/200~
MTP
FLDD050 Land Resource Review I 0/24/200~ 11/12/200~ None DONE RA 11/12/200~
MTP
FLDDOlO Stormwater Review I 0/24/200~ 1O/31/200~ None DONE BAB I 0/31/200~
BAB .
FLDD020 Fire Review I 0/24/200~ 11/5/2002 None DONE J C 11/5/2002 No Comments
J C
FLDD030 Park & Rec Review I 0/24/200~ I 0/31/200~ None DONE DWR 10/31/200~ No P&R comment.
DWR
FLDD040 Solid Waste Review I 0/24/200~ 11/7/2002 None DONE TJG 11/7/2002
TJG
FLDA140 Site Visit I 0/24/200~ None I 0/24/200~
WW
FLDA010 Application received I 0/24/200~ None DONE WW I 0/24/200~
WW .
FLDD012 Zoning Review I 0/24/200~ None I 0/24/200~
WW
FLDD014 Landscaping Review I 0/24/200~ 11/12/200~ None DONE MTP 11/12/200~
MTP
FLDD042 Environmental Review I 0/24/200~ 11/6/2002 None DONE TJF 11/6/2002
TF
Page 2 oB
CaseActivity..rpt
~
TIDEMARK
COMPUTER SYSTEMS. INC.
Case Activity Listing
Case #: FLD2002-10034
849 HARBOR ISL
11/27/2002
5:20:18PM
t
l1/12/200~ None DONE
MTP
Page 3 of3
l1/12/200~
MTP
.
.
CaseActivity..rpt
.
.
11:20 a.m.
Case: FLD2002-10034 - 849 Harbor Island
Owner/Applicant: Peter Hunt.
Location: The 0.26-acre site is located on the east side of Harbor Island, approximately 500 feet from the
terminus of Harbor Island.
Atlas Page: 249B.
Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to Terminate the Status of a Nonconforming Structure and permit
an existing 18.5-foot, rear, waterfront (east) setback where a 25 feet is required, within the LMDR, Low
Medium Density Residential District, under the provisions of Section 6-109.
Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with 18.5-foot rear setback to building.
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Mark Parry, Wayne Wells, Glen Bahnick, Joe Colbert, Rick and Tom Glenn
Applicant/Representative: Peter Hunt.
The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments:
1. Planninl!::
a) No comments
2. Traffic enl!:ineerinl!::
a) No comments
3. Stormwater:
a) No comments
4. Solid waste:
a) No comments
5. Parks and Recreation:
a) No comments
6. Landscapinl!::
a) No comments
7. Land resource:
a) No comments
8. Harbor Master:
a) No comments
9. Fire:
a) No comments
10. Environmental:
a) No comments
11. General eDl!ineerinl!::
a) No comments
NOTES:
. 15 sets of everything to be submitted to Staff by November 18,2002 in order to be scheduled for a December
17,2002 CDB meeting.
DRAFT CONDITIONS:
NONE
Draft DRC agenda - November J 4, 2002 - Page J 3
. .
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case NohD,;:>n(Jc:J - /OD5ij Meeting Date: / /--/L/-..,..200~
Location: c?C/9 ~ y-6o..,- ~ /.c/./) e>-C
o Current Use: it: ~ / r /:r- -/~/ a f
o Active Code Enforcement Cas~yes:
o Address number@1o) (vacant land)
o LandscaPin~nO)
o Overgrown (yes) @:)
o Debris (yes) ~
o Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (~
o Building(s) ~(fair) (poor) (vacant land)
o Fencing (none) (@dilaPidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
o Paint .l~air) (poor) (garish)
o Grass Parking (yes) @
o Residential Parking Violations (yes) @
o Signag~k) (not ok) (billboard)
o Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
o Dumpst~;!i)'lOt enclosed)
o Outdoor storage (yes~
Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents):
Date of Review:
Revised 03-29-01
/ /. S - D~ Reviewed by: ,,_L-, L ~
A J ; (~rf--
.
.
gi tf/~
~Ih. t/fJ-- bfo1 :J~f
811 ~/61~ ~ Z1P. ~ W 4--/j
1-tt0~0 51iJ1ib~1 M~ ? j?,#l)J)JJ:-iAJ
. ?
~.on ~
~IO 5V:I; ~?
v./~+M ~
~ ~~ jiMb/Mt -)?if~~-
/'$;~"-- ~I ~)JJ/rJ~~-
C 1o~~~-'3;P//?tWYq} adt#'#?Zf"J?
~~ ~1i~
pt 1Yl%/~~- Ol&f' ar-.
7" ~~u/c~ h ~
t- t/.if tIn:Y~~ t:7h ~~~
dfJd;Y atJt; 1J7f>>16, ?
~ -~AA~/1~ /L~_ ".'. \t._ \, .... ' ".'
/' . vaW""rCA' Ifl 'n . -.0" "
~ ~au!f?W~. .~~~ .,.
t/~~~DO J7~.~ 0 .... ..
j-/atdJ7r~~ ~ /~~8
h/Jf4b/f?7~ ~~PY//C-F" ,~., ~ ~."
7/ ' . LE
.
.
Setbacks In Question
Harbor Island
house number
Plat Location
Seawall Setback
(feet)
Side Setback
(feet)
612 Unit 7C Lot 5 15
613 Unit 7 A Lot 7 24.5
615 Unit 7C Lot 7 20
618 Unit 7C Lot 4 18
661 Unit 7C Lot 15 20
679 Unit 7C Lot 18 18
696 Unit 7c Lot 83 20
726 Unit 7C Lot 78 18
744 Unit 7C Lot 75 18
757 Unit 7C Lot 30 15
763 Unit 7C Lot 31 15
775 Unit 7C Lot 33 20
780 Unit 7C Lot 7 15
800 Unit 7C Lot 68 23.3
818 Unit 7C lot 65 18
831 Unit 7C Lot 41 15
837 Unit 7C Lot 42 23 .' \
.. ' , ,
842 Unit 7C Lot 61 21.5 t)t"\ 1 " 'L\\\\1- ' '
843 Unit 7C Lot 43 18.2 .~
.'"'
878 Unit 7C Lot 55 20 ,
\
"" --; ," ,~
891 Unit 7C Lot 51 20
FILE
.
.
.
..
AUG-20-2002 13:40
.
PRoduCTiviTY
MANAGEMENT
849 Harbor Island
.
CONsuLTANTS
P.01
Clearwater, FL 33767
PRODUCTIVITY CONSULTANTS TO
INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENT
August 20~ 2002
City of Clearwater Mayor and Commissioners
112 South Osceola A yenue
Clearwater, Florida 33758
Dear Mayor and City Commissioners:
(727) 447-6409
COPIES TO:
COMMISSION
AUG 2 0 2002
PRESS
CLERK / ATTORNEY
I have prepared these talkin~ points regarding the proposed Island Estat~ NeOD.
I will be speaking on these points at the August 22, 2002 City commission meeting
and want you to he prepared to respond.
-:Y{;s{"~,
Peter 1. Hunt, Ph.D. ... " ~
ot' .'
~
Plli/sl
, r-r
).";
F,',. !ll\,\.f.', ~\,'.' ~~
. ...,.. 'L lk--"
RECEIVED
AUG 2 0 2002
PLANNING cSt Ot.VELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
.
.
.
..
RUG-20-2002 13:41
.
.
P.02
Talking Points
Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Rezoning
Prepared by
Dr. Peter Hunt
(721) 447-6409
August 21, 2000
1. The Mandate/Consensus Issue.
a) Intuitively the 23 item survey looks like a 50/50 draw.
b) Statistical analyses of all 23 survey items suggests action on only two.
The rest are a draw.
c) Use of the 51 % criterion as a mandate.
- 51 % of the 65.7% responding equals 33.5%. Only 34% of lot
Owners support NeOD.
d) Mandates others have used.
- Other Home Owner associations require between 60 % and 75 %
of ALL residents to achieve a mandate.
~ Statistical assessment calls for 63% of the sample (not 51 % of
the sample) to achieve a mandate.
- As Commissioner Gray pointed out, the City on other matters
has often used 60 % to define a mandate.
- Current deed restrictions require a majority of all lot owners to
achieve a mandate.
e) 51 % is just a recommendation for bringing an item to the City
Commission for review. It is the responsibility of the City
Commissioners to define what constitutes their mandate for
implementing NeOD.
Remember: The Community Development Board voted 4 to 3
on using this 51 % and were very concerned about that
constituting a mandate.
,. ,,"f,""
F,fr
'\,' ~ ,',,--...
.
.
.
..
AUG-20-2002 13:41
e
.
P.03
2
2. The Big Government Issue
a) Government tends to get bigger and, at times, has difficulty controlling
its appetite.
~ Is functionality or politics driving NCDD?
b) Is changing the codes in Island &tates really necessary?
- There has been 30 years of growth on Island Estates, mostly
without enforcement of deed restrictions. What, if anything,
has gone wrong to warrant such major government intervention
now?
- A 1999 study of Island Estates found 27 % of single family
homes do not meet either the rw or side setbacks which were
part of the deed restrictions and now part of the proposed
NCDD. Today, over 30% of the homes in the Neon will
become non-confonning just to rear and side setbacks.
- Long Range Planning Department goals can still be implemented
without code changes.
c) The burden on the City to manage new codes.
- Since 30 % of private residents will become non-conforming,
who gets "grandfathered in?"
- Time and money to change codes, manage requests for
variances, legal issues, etc.
- Like the deed restrictions, the proposed codes are different for
different areas of Island Estates. (Example: Proposed rear
setbacks are 20 feet in some places and 25 feet in other places.)
d) The City has recommended adding items receiving less than the 51 %
criterion. What, then, is the value/purpose of the 23 item survey?
- Many agree the process to date has flaws.
F Il: E"-or)~"
". ..~~~
.
.
.
..
AUG-20-2002 13:41
e
.
3. H put in place for 1 year~ how will the effort be evaluated?
a) What are the measurable criteria?
b) What is the evaluation plan'}
- Who, what, when, where, and how?
4. Questions to be publicly answered.
a) Do you have a mandate?
- If you answer "yes" then publicly define that mandate.
b) Is changing the codes in Island Estates necessary?
~ If your answer is "yes, II then publicly define the necessity of
this change.
c) How will the effort be implemented and evaluated?
P.04
3
TOTAL P.04
.
.
.
3. From a rear property line: 20
feet.
(b) In-ground swimming pools and
screened pool enclosures:
1. From a street right-of-way: 30
feet.
2. From a side property line: 10
feet.
3. From a rear property line: 10
feet.
(6) Maximum height: 30 feet; except that
such height limitation shall, where appli-
cable, be increased or reduced in accord
with the height bonus provisions, airport
restrictions, and other regulations con-
tained in section 42.23.
(7) Maximum building coverage: 30 percent.
(8) Minimum open space:
(a) For the lot: 55 percent ofthe lot area.
(b) For the front yard: 60 percent of the
front yard area.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.017; Ord. No. 5189, ~ 2, 5-21-92;
Ord. No. 5296-92, ~ 2, 9-16-93; Ord. No. 5750-95,
~ 5, 12-7-95)
Sec. 40.081. General description.
This district is created to provide a low density
residential district with a maximum permitted
density of 5.5 dwelling units per gross acre. Land
areas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-
fatnily residential development.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.018; Ord. No. 5296-92, ~ 2,
9-16-93)
.
Sec. 40.082. Establishment; contraction.
It is intended that four acres or more be pro-
vided to establish a new single-family residential
6 district and that no existing single-family resi-
dential 6 district be contracted to an area of less
than four acres, unless the city commission legis-
latively by ordinance determines that a reduced
area is in the public interest.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.019)
Supp. No, 16
CD40:15
.
ZONING
~ 40.085
Sec. 40.083. Permitted uses.
Within single-family residential 6 districts, only
the following uses and structures designed for
such uses shall be permitted:
(1) Detached single-family dwellings;
(2) Family care;
(3) Accessory uses;
(4) Public education facilities, subject to com-
patibility and consistency with the city's
comprehensive plan in coordination with
the Pinellas County School District.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.020; Ord. No. 6106-97, ~ 1,
1-9-97)
Sec. 40.084. Conditional uses.
Within single-fainily residential 6 districts, the
following uses may be allowed as conditional
uses:
(1) Utility facilities.
(2) Bed and breakfast inns.
(3) Public safety facilities.
(4) Noncommercial parking.
(Ord. No. 5562-94, ~ 2, 5-19-94; Ord. No. 5714-94,
~ 4, 1-5-95; Ord. No. 6044-96, ~ 1, 7-18-96; Ord.
No. 6075-96, ~ 1, 10-3-96)
Sec. 40.085. Use limitations.
The following use limitations shall apply to
single-family residential 6 districts:
(1) Family care facilities shall comply with
all terms contained in section 41.201.
(2) Accessory uses shall comply with all terms
contained in section 41.121.
(3) All uses, whether permitted, conditional
or nonconforming, shall be conducted in
consonance with the use standards con-
tained in sections 42.22, 42.31, 42.32, and
42.34.
(4) The permitted and conditional uses al-
lowed in this district shall be subject to
the area threshold applicable to such uses
F. r~' r""""1
'. 1"L;j ~.;;:"'i't.
!L,ll!lJO'lI
.
.
~ 40.085
CLEARWATER CODE
.
as set forth in the Rules Concerning the
Administration of the Countywide Future
Land Use Plan as amended.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.022; Ord. No. 6044-96, ~ 1,
7 -18-96)
.
Sec. 40.086. Dimensional and numerical de-
velopment requirements.
The following dUnensional and numerical re-
quirements shall apply to all development within
single-family residential 6 districts:
(1) Maximum density: 5.5 dwelling units per
gr~s acre or as permitted by the compre-
hensive land use plan, whichever is less.
(2) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: 7,000
square feet.
(3) Minimum lot width at setback line:
(a) Interior lots: 70 feet.
(b) Comer lots: 90 feet.
(4) Minimum lot depth:
(a) Standard lots: 85 feet.
(b) Double frontage lots: 115 feet.
(5) Minimum setbacks: Each structure shall
be subject to the following minimum set-
backs, or to any greater setback require-
ments which may be applicable to a par-
ticular property in accordance with the
uniform development regulations con-
tained in chapter 42.
(a) Principal and accessory structures:
1. From a street right-of-way: 25
feet. -:=:-
2. From a side property line: 7
feet.
3. From a rear property line: 15
feet.
(b) In-ground swimming pools and
screened pool enclosures:
1. From a street right-of-way: 25
feet.
2. From a side property line: 7
feet.
3. From a rear property line: 7
feet.
Supp. No. 16
(6) Maximum height: 30; feet; except that
such height limitation shall, where appli-
cable, be increased or reduced in accord
with the height bonus pvovisions, airport
restrictions, and other regulations con-
tained iIi section 42.23.
(7) Maximum building coverage: 40 percent.
(8) Minimum open space:
(a) For the lot: 45 percent of the lot area.
(b) For the front yard: 50 percent of the
front yard area.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.023; Ord. No. 5189, ~ 3, 5-21-92;
Ord. No. 5296-92, ~ 2, 9-16-93; Ord. No. 5750-95,
~ 6, 12-7-95)
DMSION 5. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
8 DISTRICT (RS 8)
Sec. 40.101. General description.
This district is created to provide a low density
residential district with a maximum permitted
density of 7.5 dwelling units per gross acre. Land
areas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-
family residential development.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.024; Ord. No. 5296-92, ~ 2,
9-16-93)
Sec. 40.102. Establishment; contraction.
-
It is intended that four acres or more be pro-
vided to establish a new single-family residential
8 district and that no existing single-family resi-
dential 8 district be contracted to an area of less
than four acres, unless the city commission legis-
latively by ordinance determines that a reduced
area is in the public interest.
(Code 1980, ~ 135.025)
Sec. 40.103. Permitted uses.
Within single-family residential 8 districts, only
the following uses and structures designed for
such uses shall be permitted:
(1) Detached single-family dwellings;
(2) Family care;
(3) Accessory uses;
CD40:16
FILE
.
.
.
SPECIAL LAND USES
~ 41.131
ARTICLE IV: OTHER SPECIAL LAND
USES
DIVISION 1. GENERALLY
(RESERVED)
DIVISION 2. ACCESSORY USES
Sec. 41.121. Accessory uses.
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to
establish regulations for accessory uses of land,
water, buildings and structures which are subor-
dinate to and serve the principal uses identified
in chapter 40.
.
(2) Applicability. All accessory uses shall be in
accord with the standards contained in this sec-
tion. Evidence of ability to comply shall be re-
quired prior to the issuance of a building permit
or certificate of occupancy/use and continued com-
pliance shall be required during the longevity of
such accessory use.
.
(3) Standards. All accessory uses shall be in
accord with the following standards:
(a) The accessory use is subordinate to and
serves an established and conforming prin-
cipal use.
(b) The accessory use is subordinate in area,
extent, and purpose to the principal use.
(c) The accessory use contributes to the com-
fort, convenience or necessity of the princi-
pal use.
(d) The accessory use is located on the same
property as the principal use.
(e) The accessory use, if otherwise allowed as a
separate permitted or conditional use in
the zoning district, shall not cumulatively
exceed five percent of the gross floor area of
the principal use; otherwise, the mixed use
formula of section 40.007(4) shall be ap-
plied in determining allowable floor area
ratios and densities. The parking require-
ments for such principal and accessory
Supp. No. 12
uses shall be calculated independently and
shall be cumulative, except as noted in
section 41.072.
(Code 1980, S 136.008; Ord. No. 5193, ~ 1,7-2-91;
Ord. No. 5754-95, S 20, 1-19-95)
DIVISION 3. WATERFRONT
DEVELOPMENT*
Sec. 41.131. Waterfront development.
(1) Applicability. Except for property developed
with a detached single-family dwelling, the devel-
opment standards contained in this section shall
apply to land uses on waterfront property which
has 50 percent or more street frontage generally
parallel to the waterfront. Furthermore, these
standards are supplementary to all other regula-
tions contained in this development code such
that, where more restrictive, the standards con-
tained in this section shall govern.
(2) Side setback. Structures shall have a re-
quired setback per side equal to 20 percent of the
average width of the property or ten feet, which-
ever is' greater. For any property having a side
setback requirement in excess of 30 feet per side,
the owner may provide a setback of not less than
30 feet on one side if the setback on the other side
is increased by the excess over 30 feet.
(3) Rear {waterfront} setback. Structures shall
have a minimum setback of 50 fi ulf
of Mexico and Tampa Bay, d 25
Clearwater Harbor and Cooper's
sured from mean_high tide.
(4) Building length. Buildings shall have a
maximum length, including all appurtenant decks
and balconies, of 250 feet, such length to be
measured parallel to the public street right-of-
way.
(5) Building overlap. Two or more buildings
shall not continuously obstruct the view toward
the water from the public street right-of-way for a
.Cross referencelr-Marine advisory board, ~ 2.196 et
seq.; beaches generally, ch. 22; authority to regulate beaches,
~ 22.31; waterways and vessels, ch. 33; coastal construction
control line, ~ 42.29; signs placed on waterfront property and
in or upon bodies of water, ~ 44.57; docks, ~~ 41.151 et seq.,
53.21 et seq.
CD41:17
Pihellas County Property Appr.r Information: 05 29 15 43456 073 O.
Page 2 of5
05 / 29 / 15 / 43456 / 073 / 0440
OZ-Dec-ZOOZ JiJTl SJTlith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:43:00
Residential. Propert9 Address. Use. and Sal.es
COJTlparable sales value as Prop Addr: 849 HARBOR ISL
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Trac t : Z60.01
sales froJTl 2000 - 2001 :
961.900 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IJTlp
Plat InforJTlation 3 /1.989 6.946/Z.01Z 500.000 (Q) I
1968: Book 064 Pgs 001-00Z 5 /1.984 5.754/ 66Z 390.000 (Q) I
0000: Book Pgs - 11/1.981 5.Z68/1.156 lZ5.000 (Q) U
0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( )
2002 Value EXEMP T IONS
Just/Market: 786.600 HOJTlestead: Z5.000 Ownership 1 1. 000
SAUE-OUR-HOHES CAP Historic : 0 Use 1: 1. 000
Assessed/Cap: 496.Z00 Tax ExeJTlpt 1: .000
Other ExeJTlp t : 0
Taxable: 471. ZOO AgricuI tural: 0
2002 Tax InforJTlation Land InforJTlation
District: C..... Seawall: YES Frontage: Ba9
Cl.ear""ater View:
02 Millage: Z3. Ull Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 10.974.77
1) 8Z x 140 4.500.00 81.76 F
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 . 00 .00
Wi thout the Save-Our-HoJTles 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
17.738.50 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeJTlptions, Total Land Value: 549.489
2002 taxes will be :
18. 3Z0. 78
Short Legal ISLAND EST OF CLEAR.....ATER UNITS 60. 7A. 7C
Description UNIT 7C. LOT 44
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbinlcgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= .16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/212002
Pinellas County Property Appr.r Information: 05 29 15 43456 073 O.
Page 3 of5
05 / 29 / 15 / 43456 / 073 / 0440 :01
OZ-Dec-ZOOZ JiM SMith. CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 09:43:00
Residential Card 01 of 1 Prop Use: Z10 Land Use: 01 Li~ing Units: 1
IMp Type: Sing1e Faffli1y Prop Address: 849 HARBOR ISL
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Roo f FraMe
Roof Co~er
Continuous Wa11
S1ab above Grade
ConcBk stucco/Rec1ad
Gab1e-Hip
COfflposite Shing1e
# Stories
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
1.0
Crpt/HdT1/HdHar/Prqt
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Above Average
L 98Z
Z
Centra1 Duct
Coo1ing (Centra1)
11
o
o
o
Sub Areas
Description
1) Base Area
2) Upper Stry Base Area
3) Open Po rch
4) Garage
5) UtiHty
6)
Factor
1. 00
.90
. ZO
.35
. Z5
.00
Area
3.1Z6
I.Z04
L 094
55Z
680
o
Description
Area
o
o
o
o
o
o
Factor
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
7)
B)
9)
10)
11)
12)
Residential Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) POOL 15.000.00 1 0 7.Z00 L 98Z
2) ENCLOSURE 1696 Z. Z5 1.696 0 L 830 L 98Z
3) DOCK 3Z0SF 15. 00 3Z0 0 4.Z70 L 998
4) FIREP LAC E 5.000.00 1 0 4.800 L 999
5) STH/SEC SH 1.300.00 1 0 L ZOO L 999
6) STH/SEC SH 1.000.00 1 0 9Z0 1.999
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: ZO.ZZO
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
~~[I][f]g]~
http://pao.co.pinellas.f1. us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 121212002
Pinellas County Property App.r Information: 05 29 15 43456 073 O.
Page 4 of5
837
HARBOR
ISL
836
HARBOR
15L
HA~iloR
ISL
830
H~~~OR
H~i50R
HA~tR
ISL
819
HARBOR
ISL
~
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?0=I&a=l&b=1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p= ... 12/2/2002
Pmellas County Property App.r Information: 05 29 15 43456 073 O.
Page 5 of5
Pinellas County Property Appraiser
Parcel Information
Back to Search Page
An explanation of this screen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r= . 16&s=4&t= 1 &u=O&p=... 12/212002
~~
>.. ~.
~2 J{~
m
~1
-n.
~O
m
29
28
,.,
27
...
~ 238A
...
-T--
--------~--
'8
51'
51 H
...
... \00 ...
52 ...
'6
...
5~
., ~
'"
'0
..'
~9
.., P
~
<{
OJ
V
N
'8. ~
8,
~
~I
.~
~
G;
tl
:;;
':i
0..
f6
1Sl
;.;
0
~
?'j
0
't
'"
ai
~
(J)
:5
$
0
<C
0
0
.....
:;)
'f.
~
~
~
U)
CITY OF CLEARWATER
AIllI VICIII\TY
PJIlBU.AS COUIITY, F.LORlDA
PREPAAED BY
PUBlJC 'IIORKS ADlI1NISTRATJON
ENCtHEERINC
100 S N)ttllr Aw., CIIoor"crter. rL 3J758
Pro.: {B13)582-475D. fCll: (813)~21J-.4755
hit,: 11...,c1l1Otwoler-n.com/tl'lQ.....j
Di.agktl..-:
PUblic InfOl'tnotloon dolo I. ~r"'thed by th. CIty of C1K1rwoltr
PUblic Work. Admlnl.trOU()n/Engln....,~. Clnd must Ilol' oc<:~ted
ond used by the recJt1cnt with the underston~Q that the doto
reaiwd WOJI CClll~cttd (or the PUrpOSl of dhetop....1J CI CJl'Op"'c
'nfroslrue-hol'. inventor}". As WJch, n... City of Clearwater PWAf[
"'ok'. 1\0 warront..... t.ptnsed or implied. conc.rnln9 t".
aecurocy. completeness. rt'ltob1ll'ty, tit ""tabIUty of thl. dota for
on)' other pCHlleutor UM. F"urthennore. the elly of et.orwoter
PWA/E anum" no liability, whottlore' onodoted .It" the Utle
or mlsuu 0' $Ill:" data. .
IlllIE;
Thlto Allato poq. lto ~ject 10 perlodc eha"9.1I.
for \rlf'ormatlon obout krl.,' revis'ons please call PWA/E or
~sll our 'lfttob .Ut!'.
N
EB
100 200 400 600
I I I I
SCALE: ," s .00'
LEGEND:
c.g L(uJ/r-w-~
@ BLOCK NUMBER
1234 LOT ADDRESS
p
~
CITY LIMITS LINE
1l"'~'~':1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
L;~',,"" OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS
. AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
. CITY OWNED PROPERTY
M D R ZONING DESIGN A liON
- ZONE LINE
REVISED:
03/08/99
4
ZONING ATLAS
249B
NE 1/4 OF SECTION
5 - 29 S - 15 E
CL WCoverSheet
.
.
FLD2002-10034
849 HARBOR ISL
Date Received: 10/24/2002
PETER J. HUNT
ZONING DISTRICT: IEOJ) r!~'fjT'~'-\ i: ;
LAND USE: RU ,--.....1: \1 \
o C 1 2 It 2002 I U :
~....../
ATLAS PAGE: 249B .'.'
'.. ,
I
....J
FILE
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
January 21, 2003, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in Commission Chambers, third floor of City Hall, 112 South Osceola
Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishinl! to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinl!. Those
cases that are not contested bv the applicant. staff. neil!hborinl! property owners. etc. will be placed on a
consent al!enda and approved bv a sinl!le vote at the bel!inninl! of the meetinl!.
1. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Decade 80-XIV (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) - flexible development approval to
increase the height of a building with attached dwellings from 30 feet to 149 feet (as measured from base flood
elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions ofSec 2-903.C, and to reduce the
buffer width along the north property line from 10 feet to 5 feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: 146 attached condominium dwellings, 8 attached townhome dwellings,
120-s1ip marina [73 public slips and 43 slips reserved for condos] and 7,500 square-foot nonresidential uses
[restaurant/ship's store/marina office]) at 900 North Osceola Ave., J.A. Gorra Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3; Sue Barco Sub,
Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23; and F. T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10. FLD2002-10036. (TO BE CONTINUED TO
DATE UNCERTAIN)
2. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Peter J. Hunt. TRE - flexible development approval to terminate the status of a
nonconforming structure to permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot
setback is required, under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot
rear setback to building) at 849 Harbor Island, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 6D, 7 A, 7C, Lot 44. FLD 2002-
10034
3. (Cont. from 12/18/02) Morton Plant Hospital Association. Inc. - flexible development application to revise a
master site plan previously approved by the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the Community
Development Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development standards as part of the original
Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community Development Board):
· Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pine lias Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary shop)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell Cancer Pavilion)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);*
· Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building);*
· Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet to five feet (to
pavement)*;
· Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*;
· Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*;
· Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*;
· Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet*.
(Proposed Use: Changes to an approved Master Plan including improved stormwater facilities, the addition of
property enlarging the campus, the replacement and/or enlargement of seven buildings and the addition of three
parking garages) at 300 Pinellas St., Sec 21-29-15, M&B's 12.01, 12.02, 12.03, 12.12, 12.15,21.01,21.02 & 21.03;
Magnolia Park, Blk 35 Lots 1-9 & Lots 14-22 and E 10 ft ofa 60 ft abandoned RR right-of-way; Magnolia Park, Blk
38, Lots 1-8 inclusive and 1/2 vac street N, Lots 15, 16, 17, 18-22 inclusive; Bluff View, Lots 16-26 & E 31 ft of Lot
27 and less 10 ft vac alleyadj on Riess E; Milton Park, Blk 5, Lots 1-6 & N 1/2 vac alley adj on S; Milton Park, Blk
7, Lots 1-7 and vac alley between Lots 2-7 and N 1/2 vac alley adj S of Lot 1; S.J. Reynold's Sub., Lots 1-5 & N 20
ft of Lot 6, Lot 7-9; J.B. Roberts Sub, Lots 1-2 & 1/2 vac alley on E less road. in NW comer SD Lot 1, Lots 3-5 &
7-11 inclusive and vac alley between & pt unnrn lot of Poms Park lying S; Poms Park, E 93.68 ft of unnumbered
tract S of Pin ell as Ave & N 1/2 ofvac St. on S; Petzold Gulf View, Lot 3 & part of Lot 2 & 4; Turners AC Add to
Milton Park Blks A&B & 1/2 vac st on N; Heart and Vascular Pavilion, Commercial Condo - Common Elements;
Westover, Blk A, Lots 1-22 & vac rds on E & S; Westover, Blk B, Lots 1,2,3 and Lot 7 and W 14 ft of Lot 6 and
Lots 8-17 & vac Pinellas St. adj on N and Lot 4 of Barnes, W.N. Sub, Bluff View Court E 18 ft of Lots 1, 7, 9, 11,
13,15, 17, 19 & 20 W for road, All of Bluff View Court sub including right of ways less 18 ft for Reynolds Avenue
right of way and unplatted land adjacent on W, and Westover Blk B, Lots 4-5 and E 39.3 ft of Lot 6. FLD 2002-
10035
4. Beach Motel Manal!ement (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval (1) to permit attached
dwellings with a reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east)
setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 feet to 1.8 feet (to pool deck), a reduction of
the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) of a 6-s1ip, multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-601;
and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling development with a 6-sli, multi-
.
.
use dock) at 620 Bavway Blvd. (The Moorings I), Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 9 & 10 and riparian rights. FLD
2002-11 039/PL T 2002-11003
5. Cotel. Inc. (The Moorings Townhomes) - flexible development approval to pennit attached dwellings with a
reduction of the front (south) setback along Bayway Boulevard from 15 feet to 3 feet (to pavement), reductions of
the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to building and pavement) and from 10 to 2 feet (to pool deck) and a reduction of the rear (north)
setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval for 6 lots. (Proposed Use: A 6-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing 6-s1ip, multi-use dock) at 674 Bavway Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 19 &
20. FLD 2002-11038/PLT 2002-11002
6. Bril!:htwater Investment Establishment (Angelika Marocordes) - flexible development approval for attached
dwellings within the Tourist District with reductions of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 4.5 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 4.8 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to 6 feet (to pavement), reductions of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building)
and from 20 feet to 0 feet (to boardwalk) and to pennit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way,
as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions ofSec 2-803.C and preliminary plat approval
for 10 lots. (Proposed Use: A 10-unit attached dwelling development) at 161 Bril!:htwater Dr., Bayside Sub No.2,
Lots 14-16 inclusive. FLD 2002-11042/PLT 2002-11005
7. Gus DiGiovanni (Bayway Townhomes, LLC) - flexible development approval (1) to pennit attached dwellings
with a reduction of the front (south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (east) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), reductions of the side (west) setback
from 10 feet to 5 feet (to pavement and building), a reduction of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (to
walkway), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) for a lO-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Sec 3-
601; and preliminary plat approval for 11 lots. (Proposed Use: An II-unit attached dwelling project with 10 docks)
at 656 Bayway Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 15-18. FLD 2002-11041/PLT 2002-11004
8. Burnaby Welch Corporation - flexible development approval for attached dwellings with reductions of the front
(south) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to dumpster enclosure and elevator) and from 15 feet to 9 feet (to stairwell), a
reduction of the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the side (west) setback from
10 feet to 5 feet (to pool equipment room), from 10 feet to 8.1 feet (to stairwell) and from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to
pavement), reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and walkway) and an
increase in building height from 35 feet to 42 feet (as measured from base flood elevation), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 15-unit attached dwelling
development with an existing ll-slip dock) at 692 Bayway Blvd., Bayside Sub No.5, Blk A, Lots 21-23. FLD
2002-11 043
9. Carlouel Yacht Club - flexible development approval for the construction of a commercial dock (10 feet by 250
feet floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 221.67 feet to 6 feet,
under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed use: A lO-foot wide by 250-foot long floating dock [adjacent to
seawall]) at 1091 Eldorado Ave., Mandalay Replat, Blk 171, Lots 6-11 and part of Lots 4 & 5. FLD 2002-10033
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning
Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500
FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COpy OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS & LEGISLATIVE
SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN
ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL OFFICIAL RECORDS &
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4093.
Ad: 01105/03
J. P""-
.
r t-[l ~1!)[)2 .- /003 t-f (03 e~ t:"6{)
/ -~/- 0.3 Cbt3 4L6
F<Ef:'F' IE, J(\MF:::S (~I
REFFIE, DEBORAH A
,/'fO HARBOF< I SL
CLE(~~f~:\1J(~T[f~ F:'L
3:3.7 () 7' 1:~~().:;,
ARMANIOUS, SAMIR
(~~F~H(.~N I OUS" r"i(lF.;: J E
n07 H(1F~130R I SL.
CLE(~F<hll:),TER r.~7L
:3~)~l61 ~7 1.8()7"
Dr-ILL" ROGEP r1
Df~LL" ~JUD 1 TH (;~
819 H(1F<DOF,~ 1 SL,
CLE(~F<(/\I(~ITEr< FL
::S 3 '/' C;l '7 .1. [~() '7
NADER" RICHARD J
r--!'I~DEF:" L\'Dln H
851 f'I(~RB()F< I SL
CI_EI~~F~I,,\I(~TE:R P'L
3 ~:.S 'I"~ 6 '~l 1. ;~3 (J Y7
MC GPATH" REDIA T
HC GRATH" MICHAEL F
935 ORVILLE: WOOD RD
CHESTERF I EL.D t"iO
6~)OO:,
F' L. 'y' j'.!, t--.!" THO r.j (~l S F
FLYNr,.!" Jl...lDY L.
855 H(~IRBCm 1 SL
Cl_EAF~hl(.~TEh~ FL.
:3 ~?5 7 ~St '7 1. f~ () 7'
G(~~GNE '" RUC)'Y' L
GAGNE" LORRAINE G
86"/ Hr-IF<BOf::?, IS
Cl_E(~h~!/\I(~TEf~ F'7L
:5 ~:) )' (;1 ~7 1 ;~~ () '7
Zlcll<" PI~1UL J
8'79 l"IAF<:E;(JF~ I SL
CL[:~(:)Rli"I()TEF< FL
3 ~5 ~/ If::, ''I .1 ~J () '.,
KlOPCIC" RICHARD F
KLOPCIC" HETTY J
891 H(~~RBOF~ I SL.
CL.E('iRli"I(~TE:h~ FL
25 :5 ''7 (:;t 7' 1. f~; () 7'
LONGE" BARBARA C
8')2 H(.'if.<BOR 1 SL
CL.I::::(C'jf::?'~\)(lTr::R FL
:5 ::5 ~7 {:) 7" 1. :f3 r) ,~~,
.
:r ~I-~ A I\J D E.:5 'rA T!3- .5
(P'1tJ L.5A-17ND 'NAj
(2/...J=-1-I- If!.--, to 1+ rE. e~ F "-
r"'j ('::l T S IS" t...!, I C: 1-10 L. (;~ ::;:;
~301 l'I{~r<:!30f~: 1 SL.
C L, E () F? V,,, (;~lr E F;~ F'L
:~:; :.:~ 7 (~;t '7 .1 [~~ () or?
hC L.UPE ,. E:L.I~i I i",!,E::
r;;;;15 H()PI3C)P IS
CL,E (-~lHI"')(;>1 T Ef::;~ r:L
:5::':;"/':;.'7
[) 1 LL~ ,. C1 I L,DI~l N
B2S f'I(~F~130F~ I SL
C:::L.[(~f~I,.,.I(\ TEf.?' FL
:~5 ~~:; ~7 () '7 .1 r~0; () '}'
HUTCHENS, JAMES E
HUTCHENS, CAROL.YN K
2:;~;l f'll~f;~130R I SL
CL,E(lHI"')(.~IT[F~ FL_
::~; :~::; 7' (;1 '7 .1. c~ () 7'
o HUj",!,'T" PETF=F~:I "rF~E:
849 H('~F~HOF~ IS
C;L,E::(lF<,,.')(:lTE:R FL.
?; ~!.s '''l (~;t "7 .1. ~3 () '7
OL.IPRA. KENNETH A
OL.1 PR(>:" p(>,r"'iE:L(~ (~
:::;:61 HnRE30r~ I SL
C L. E: (:l R 'i') (:::l 'r E: F< F L,
?; ?) '7 6, '7 .1 ;~~!; () "7
FAIRCHILD. ROSALIE B
f::"/:5 H('~RBOP I SL
CL,E::(~r<~I,I}{~ TCf-< FL
:~5 ::5 ~? l,~, '/ .1 ~3 () "7
BURNSIDE. ROBERT J
;~J ~3 .:;- }....: Pi r~~ 1:3 () F~~ I ~> L...
C L. E (0) R I,,") (:1 T C: r\~ F L.
:?:; ;5 ~{ (. '7 .1. f:~ () '7
Me HULL.EN, DONNA B
MC HUL.L.EN, THOhns W
90() l.j(:)h~130P I SL
C:: L E PI F,: 'i,,1 (~~ T r:: F< Fe L,
::; 2~ 7' (;. '7 .1 ;3 () ()
F' I Ntl" CH(iRI_ES
FIr.,! (~I, ,....!, 0 H r"'j A D
4422 L. I \,iE O(~f<.
P()L.i"'i H:~'ih~E:OH FL
/"'1 TRE
Tf::;~[
13L. \,/[)
~3 .4 (. f~ E;, (~l () :2 :2:
{l.., V I <!..
.A S:5N
.3 -3 7 ~T
,
,.. .
.
.
NITKA" THEODORE L
N ITf<'(~ ,. SAL,L '{ S
OlD H(~lr~[30R IS
CLEAF~I.,\I(-iTEF~ FL,
COLE. ILENE S TRE
c;ll~:, i"-!ORTH ()V[~
DE:[RF' I ELD I L
:537(;t~l 18()()
(;t () () .1.~5 :~l :2 () ::.~;
JEVTIC. MIHAILO M TRE:
866 H(~IF:B()R IS
CLE{:lRI/')(;~IT[~~ FL.
{:lUl30, ()h~THI.Jr.1
(:1[3[30" ,JE(~t,..!~...JC
860 f'I(:)h~U01:;1 IS
C:L.,E(~,F~I/"I() TER F" L.
5::57<,:,'7 1806
:s :~) ~l <::;. "/ .1. ~J () (S
MANDRAVCLIS" FAYE
:3~)4 H(~RE30R I ~:;L"
C:L[(')RI/J(lTEF<~ I~:L
THOMPSON. JAMES C
THOMPSON. ANITA C
gr.ts H(~IRUOF;~ I:::)
C L. E (~r~ 1"',,1 (iT I::: F~ F L
::'S:5 "7 (~) 7
:3 ~; '7 c:' ~? .J... ;~:~ () I:;.
WOLFE, GEORGE C TRE
WOLFI:::. SHIRLEY M TRE
f::l42 l"I(~R[-30R I~)
CLE:(~h~I/,,1ArEh~ Ff"
3 :,::5 }' (;1 "7 .:.1,.. t~~ () (;t
(liviORf" DOi"'J.()LD C:
712 E CRABTREE DR
(1 r:;~ L. I i"'~ GT 0 [....! HI'S :r L.
6()()04 2620
S H ,~) 1/,,1 '" (-i H [....! t..j
8;;'0 H()r~BOR I :::3L,
CLEf--lF~I/,)(-~ TEr-~ FL,
TAYLOR, WILLIAM N
r(~YL,Or.~" SHEIL(-~: R
824 H(lRUOF{ IS
C;L,E(~,F~I,I,,1()'rl:::h~ FL
?; :~:; 7' 6. '7 .1 f3 () 12:.
::~:; :~~; "7 (:, "7 J... ~::s () (~;t
BRUGGENTHIES. GUNTHER 0
URUGGEHTHIES, JUDITH L
818 r'I()RBOF,: IS
C'"E(:lRI,I"I(~TF:R FL.
["'j 1':\"'( N () F;:: I.)" I) (>,1,/ I DC::
812 H()r;~E:OF< ISI"
CL.E-:nHI,,\,1(lTl'::P F:'l"
:~) 2~ ~r (~.1 ~l .1 t'3 r.) (:~
ZS ::.;; )" (~I }' .1. ~3 () (1
PPIDDY" DI:::NNIS G
D()6 H()HnOr;~ 13L,
CL,F::(eiHI"'){:'iTEr-~ FL
I' {~" T (1 H () li"I" f< C j"',,!
80() H{~lh~f30F~: IS
CL.[:(::PIAI{-)TEH FL
;5 :.) ~7 (~ '7 .1. t3 () I~S
::s :~5 )'r I~~ '7 1. ~~~ () (,
CiIOL"L.I" r=L"OHIO
n I OL,L I" (~IHL I t".!1:::
713() Hnf~E30P 1:3
CL.[(~r(I,I,,1(')TEF~ FL,
3576l 180,~1
SP[C~J<." JOHi",! F
SPEC;f<'", ::::;l)C: n
8.1.5 Si....J.L.lO I :3L,
(:: L. [ ('I F~ 1.",1 () T F: r~ F L
:~) ::~:; ~? f~;, .'/ 1. ~3 :5 l~:1
HUXLEY IHTNTL HOLDINGS
818 Sr,!UCi ISL.
e:: L. [: (1 f~,~ i,I,,1 ()T E: H F'L.
.J CI N C'. S ,. () t..,! t...J. T
;3 :':5 ~/ I ~:::; t~ PI r...! [) I,n,l (i .~(
::5 ~5 '7 (:;1 7" 1 ~3::)::S
C: L, E (~1 P l,h,1 (1 '1' [ r:';~ F:: L
:::~; ::5 'll~::;t ../" .1. ~3 :;2 (:;1
SCHLICK, LINDA L
2966 HULL"," C:T
C:;L.E:(iR\I,,1(l TF:F'1 ~:'L
:3 :::) 7 1~~:1.1 :::) ~~ () '7
l' t:IP\iEh~" THOi....if4:3 r'l
T(lr~VEh~" HE:L,Ci() E:
1304'S:' I S L. (:) i"'J. D I,,") (\ '('
CL.[(~IF<~I,I,,1nT[=p FL
?; :.-; '7 6. '7 .1. ;~~;:2 (,
HARTHEN, DAVID L TRE
HARTHEN, PAULA K TRE
6C)1 H()PSE[....! F~D
LnPEEH t"iT
I..FEDS" F;:ODEF~T L
t., E E D ~;;" ,J 0 Plf"'! 1,1\1
;~!: 61 I S L. (1 i"'~ D 1/\) PI Y
C;LEf4F~:I,I,,1(:)IT[:H F't,
,.<1.1::~ l:j. .::'f l:~ ~2 7' (~. ::~
:?5 ?; ~"l (:;1 "7 .1 :E~; :2 6,
j"iP,Y" L.F:LI() S
e67 131_(ij'''!D i,.I,I{~y
CLE(::)F;:I;"I(~T[r~ F'L,
CO (11 F :::;" Ci F~ () l"i ["'i ~/i
C: 0 t\T E 3", t"'j (~I H J n i....j
873 1:3 L t\ i"..J D 1,,",1 (1 'I'"
C L. C PIP V,,1 ()I C F:;: F L.
:?:; ~5 'll~~) 1 _1 f~ ~2 C)
?:; ::::s '7 (:;, "'7 J,., E: ::2: 1::,1
r" ,
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
December 17, 2002, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishine to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetine. Those
cases that are not contested by the applicant. staff. neiehborinj! property owners. etc. will be placed on a
consent aeenda and approved by a sinele vote at the beeinnine of the meetine.
1. Morton Plant Hospital Association. Inc. (Gerald Yates) are requesting a flexible development application to
revise a master site plan previously approved by the City Commission in 1995 and subsequently amended by the
Community Development Board in January 2000 and October 2002, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project including the following requests (* indicates previously approved site development standards
as part of the original Master Plan and subsequent amendments by the Community Development Board):
· Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to 15 feet (to building)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Jeffords Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to existing auxiliary shop )*;
· Reduction in front setback along Pinellas Street from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing Powell Cancer Pavilion)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Druid Road from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
. Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement);
· Reduction in front setback along Reynolds Street from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building);
· Reduction in front (east) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 25 feet to 10 feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in front setback along Magnolia Street from 25 feet to five feet (to pavement)*;
· Reduction in side (east and west) setback along the Pinellas Trail right-of-way from 25 feet to five feet (to
pavement)*;
· Reduction in side setback along all other sides from 25 feet to 15 feet*;
. Increase in height of a parking garage from 50 feet to 59 feet*;
. Increase in height of a medical clinic from 30 feet to 45 feet*;
· Increase in the height of a hospital building from 50 feet to a maximum of 103 feet*. (Proposed Use: Changes to
an approved Master Plan including improved stormwater facilities, the addition of property enlarging the campus,
the replacement and/or enlargement of seven buildings and the addition of three parking garages) at 300 Pinellas
St.., Sec. 21-29-15, M&B's 12.01, 12.12, 12.15,21.01,21.02 & 21.03; Magnolia Park, Blk 35 Lots 1-9 & Lots 14-
22 and E 10ft of a 60 ft. abandoned RR right-of-way; Magnolia Park, Blk 38, Lots 1-8 inclusive and 1/2 vac St. N,
Lots 15-22; Bluff View Lots 1-26 & part of Lot 27; Milton Park, Blk 5, Lots 1-6 & N 1/2 vac alley adj on S; Milton
Park, Block 7, Lots 1-7 and vac alley between Lots 2-7 and N 1/2 vac alley adj S of Lot 1; S.J. Reynold's Sub., Lots
1-5 & N 20 ft of Lot 6, Lot 7-9; JB Roberts Sub, Lots 1-2 & 1/2 vac alley on E less rd. in NW comer SD Lot 1, Lots
3-5 & 7-11 inclusive and vac alley between & pt unnm lot ofPorns Park lying S; Porns Park, part of Lot 3, Lot 6 &
1/2 vac alley on E; Petzold Gulf View, Lot 3 & part of Lot 2 & 4; Turners AC Add to Milton Park Blks A&B & 1/2
vac st on N; Heart and Vascular Pavilion, Commercial Condo; Westover, Blk A, Lots 1-22 & vac rds on E & S;
Westover, Blk B, Lots 1-17 & vac Pinellas St. adj on N and Lot 4 of Barnes, W.N. Sub; and Porn's Park E 93.68 ft
of Unnumbered Tract S of Pin ell as Ave & N 1/2 ofVac St. on S. FLD 2002-10035
2. Homeless Emereency Proiect. Inc. are requesting a flexible development application as a reVlSlon to a
previously approved Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (FLD 02-04-09) for a residential shelter in the
Commercial District, with reductions in the front (west) setback along North Betty Lane from 25 feet to 15 feet (to
stairwell) and from 25 feet to 23 feet (to building), reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to four feet (to
building) and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to stairway ramping), under the
provisions of Section 2-704.B (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of eight units) at 1215 North Betty Lane, Pine
Brook Unit #2, Blk E, Lot 16. FLD 02-04-09A
3. Peter J. Hunt. TRE is requesting a flexible development approval to terminate the status of a nonconforming
structure to permit an existing 18.5-foot rear/waterfront (east) setback (to building) where a 25-foot setback is
required, under the provisions of Section 6-109 (Proposed Use: Existing detached dwelling with an 18.5-foot rear
setback to building) at 14 Somerset St., Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 6D, 7A, 7C, Lot 44. FLD 2002-10034
4. Hampton Road Dev. Corp. / Limited Properties. Inc. (Neil Keifer and James Bums / Brandon Realty Venture,
Inc.) are requesting Parcel A (2.62 acres): Flexible Development approval to reduce the rear (east) setback from 20
feet to 10 feet (to dumpster enclosure), reduce the side (north and south) setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet (to
pavement) and reduce the front (west) setback along Hampton Road from 25 feet to 15 feet (to pavement), under the
provisions of Section 2-1004. Parcel B (0.44 acres): Flexible Development approval to permit an off-street parking
facility within the Office District with landscaping on the internal side of a wall and with lighting that automatically
turns off after 9:00 p.m. (as required under the provisions of Section 2-1003.G) and a reduction in the side (south)
setback from 10 feet to five feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of
Section 2-1004.B (Proposed Use: The application includes (Parcel A) a 30,000 square foot office building and
(Parcel B) a 36-space off-street parking lot) at 7 Hampton Rd., Sec. 17-29-16, M&B's 13.03, 13.04, 13.041 &
13.05. FLD 2002-10037
. .....
.
.
5. Richard S. & Mindv M. Bacon are requesting a flexible development approval to permit retail sales and animal
grooming as a primary uses within an existing building, permit retail sales in excess of the maximum 10 percent of
the building floor area, permit direct access to a major arterial street (Sunset Point Road), permit back-out into the
right-of-way of Harbor Circle, with a reduction of the front (north) setback along Sunset Point Road, from 25 feet to
20 feet (to existing building), a reduction of the front (north and south) setbacks along Sunset Point Road and Harbor
Circle from 25 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement), a reduction of the front (south) setback along Harbor Circle
from 25 feet to seven feet (to existing building), a reduction of the side (west) setback from 20 feet to eight feet (to
existing building) and a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 17 spaces to 11 spaces, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-1004 (Proposed Use: An existing
multi-tenant building with retail sales and animal grooming uses) at 2645 Sunset Point Rd., Hilltop Sub., Lots 2-3.
FLD 2002-09027
6. Decade 80-XIV I Pinellas Bd of Pub Inst (Clearwater Bay Marina, LLC) are requesting a flexible development
approval to increase the height of a building with attached dwellings, from 30 feet to 164 feet (as measured from
base flood elevation), and a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 107 spaces to 24 spaces, as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C (Proposed Use: A mixed-use
development of 146 attached condominium dwellings, eight attached, townhome dwellings, l20-slip marina (73-slip
public use and 47-slip private use), and 12,000 square-foot nomesidential uses (restaurant, ship's store and marina
office) at 900 N. Osceola Ave., J.A. Gorra, Elk 2, Lots 1-3; Sue Barco, Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23; and F.T. Blish's
Sub., Lots 1-3 & 8-10. FLD 2002-10036
7. Michael G. Preston. TRE (Frenchy's Seafood) is requesting a flexible development for the addition of a 480
square foot dock extension to a 3,114 square foot commercial dock with a reduction in the side (south) setback from
7.5 feet to three feet (existing), an increase in length from 56.34 feet to 260 feet and an increase in width from 56.34
feet to 60 feet under the provisions of Section 3-601 (Proposed Use: The addition of two, 240 square foot dock
extensions (480 square feet total) each 40 feet in length with a total eight slips, to an existing 3,114 square foot
commercial dock, 220 feet in length with 10 slips, as accessory to an existing retail sales and service establishment)
at 419 East Shore Dr., Barbour-Morrow Sub, Elk C, Lot 5 & N 1/2 of Lot 6 & subm. land. FLD 2002-08022
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the
Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review
by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning
Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call (727) 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning Department
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY PERSON
WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST
AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 12/01102
..
11
.
.
FLDexooa-10031f (Of3 1~-(7-OJ
4 Lf (0) 4>- (2) {y p)
REFFIE" JAME~3 A
REFFIE. DEBORAH A
787 HARBOR ISl
ClEM~I/UHER Fl._
33767 1805
l"IATSIS" NICHOLAS
80.1 HARBOR ISl
CI_EAI~~'.JA TER Fl
33'7() 7 1807
ARMANIOUS" SAMIR
ARMANIOUS" MARIE
807 HAFmOR I Sl
ClE(-~F~IIUHEI~ Fl_
~53767 1807
MC LURE. ELAn"IE
fH3 HAFmOF~ IS
CL,E::Hr'~~\Jf"ITER FL.
3;.'5767
W~lL" ROGEI~ ~'I
13(iLl_" ,JUDITH (i
819 HAFmOR I SL
CU~(-~F~v\IATER Fl
~3376 7 1807
DILL" CUU)I:l N
825 H(-~R80R ISL
CU~ARIt.U~TER F"l
:3:5?67 1807
NADER. RICHARD J
NADEI~" l._ YD I (-~I E;
8:':;1 HARBOR I Sl
CLE:()F~IIJ()TE:R F'L
::53767 1807
HUTCHENS. JAMES E
HUTCHENS. CAROLYN K
f:~3l HfinSOR I SI_
CL,EPjf~I,\I(~ITE:F~ Fl
33767 1807
PRIDDY" DENNIS G
806 HARBOR ISl
CLEARWATER FL
3:5767 _l806
TATARm\)" KEN
800 H(-~RBOR IS
CLEI~RIAlATER Fl
3:5767 1806
GIOLlI" FlOFUO
(UOlLI" 1'~Rl_H~E
780 HARBon IS
ClEAF~II,J(-nEF~ r::'L,
~337 (:, 7 1804
SPECI<,,, ~10HN F
SPECK" S!.)E A
813 Si'J.UG I SL.
ClEARllJATER r::'l_
::~;3767 113;34
HUXLEY INTNTl HOLDINGS
818 SNUG ISl
CU::r-:)Rv.JATEF~ Fl
33767 1833
JOi"lES. ANN T
837 ISlAl",!D I....J()Y
ClEAf~I/.JATEF~ FL
3::5767 1826
SCHLICK" LINDA l
2966 HOLLY CT
ClEAFH^Jr-:HER Fl
:33761 390?
T(-~RVER" THm1AS H
T (~RVEf~" HELC~A E
849 I SUiND 'AlAY
CLE(-~Rv.J(HER FL
33767 1826
HAnTHEN. DAVID l TRE
HARTHEN. PAULA K TRE
601 Hf-.)RSEN RD
L,APEEF~ ~1I
48446 2762
LEEDS" ROBERT L
lEEDS" ,JO(,~N W
861. rSU.)ND "'JAY
CLEf~F<I."'(iTEI~ Fl
33767 1826
MAY" LElU) S
86? ISLAND 'AlAY
ClEf-.)Rt^JATER FI_
~5:57(.'7 1826
COATE:S" GF<~AHM ~1
COf~'TE::~3" 1'1Ar~~ I A ~1
873 I~Jl(.'ji'm Wf~Y
CLEI~f~vJ(-~'TE:f~ Fl
33767 1826
/I
.
.
ORSATTI, CHARLES T
8/~-::'-) HAr~801~ I SL
CLE(.)RI;.JATER F:L
~'5:,)76 7 1807
HUNT. PETER J TRE
849 HARBOR IS
CL.EARI/.JATr:::R FL.
.3S767 1807
FLYNN. THOMAS F
FL YN~'~, JUDY L
855 HARBOR ISL
CLEAR\I.)ATEFt FL
.3:')767 1807
OLIPRA. KENNETH A
OL:rpr~A. PAt....iELA t\
861 Hr-:\RBOR ISL
CLEARI^'~'.HER FL
.3.3767 1807
GlAGNE, RUDY [_
GAGNE, LORRAINE G
867 HARBm~ IS
CLEARiiJf-'.HER Fl_
?;.3767 1807
FAIRCHILD. ROSALIE B
87.3 Hf-~R80Ft :r 5L
CLI:: A Rl,IJ A TH< F-L
~5.37 6 7 1807
ZAK, PAUL ,J
879 H(.)FmOR ISL
CLEAI~I"Jf.lTER FL
.3?/767 1807
BURNSIDE, ROBERT J
f385 H(;~RBOF! 1 SL
CLE~~R(/,JA TER F:L
.3::'-)767 1807
KLOPCIC, RICHARD F
KLOPCIC. BETTY J
893.. HARBOR ISL
CLEf-'ir':;;vJATER r=L
.3.3767 1807
MC MULLEN, DONNA B
MC MULLEN, THOMAS W
900 Hf.fr~BOR I SL.
CLEAR\^J(~n:r-< FL
~';.376 7 1800
LONGE, BARBARA C
892 HAr~BOR I SL
CLEf.)RI.I.)ATER FL
~5S7 6? 1806
FINA. CHARLES M TRE
FINA, NORMA D TRE
4422 LIVE OAK BLVD
F'ALt-1 H(~f~80r~ FL
.34685 4022
NITKA. THEODORE L
NITI<.f.f, SALLY S
878 H(~Rf30R IS
CLEf-~r~v.,l(HEF~ F-~L
.3.37 t} 7 1806
COLE, ILENE 5 TRE
975 t'-.!ORTH (~VE
DEE:r-<F' 1 FL..D I L
60015 220.3
JEVTIC. MIHAILO M TRE
866 Hf)RE.mR IS
CLEARWATER FL
3.3767 1806
(")Bt30, ARTHUF~
(4BE30. JE(')NNE
860 H(.)RBOR IS
CLE~~R(.I)(-,HEr;~ FL.
33767 1.806
MANDRAVELIS, FAYE
854 H(.\FmOR I SL
CLEARWATEI:< FL
33767
THOMPSON. JAMES B
THOMPSON. ANITA C
848 Hf.)Rt30R IS
CLEfml",I(.) TER FL
3376 '/ 1.806
WOLFE. GEORGE C TRE
WOLFE, SHIRLEY M TRE
842 H(')RBOI~ IS
CLEI-1Rl,#.) TER FL
~3.3767 1.806
(-lt10RT" DONALD C
712 E CRABTREE DR
f.lF~L I NetTON HTS I L
60004 2620
SHAI/.J. ANN tyi
830 H(.)f~BOf~ I SL
CU::(.)RIIU4 TEF< FL
:::53767 1806
TAYLOR. WILLIAM N
T~~VLOr-? SHEIL(~I F~~
824 HARBOF~ r S
CLE(.~F~(.IJ(HEFt F:L
(;'3'16/ 1806
BRUGGlENTHIES. GUNTHER 0
BRUGGENTHIES. JUDITH l
818 HARt30R IS
CLEf-~FM(HER FL
33767 1.806
M(~'O'>j(~RD. DA\iID C
812 f-l(.)RBOF< :r SL
CU::AFMA TER FL.
33767 1806
/