FL00-10-46
Florida Marine & Resort
Deve/opers~ Inc.
670 Island Way #305
Clearwater. Florida 33767
Phone: 407-421-4188
Email: dharriIl1@Yahoo.com
Donald L. Harrill
President
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
Thomas G. Radcliffe, P.E.
29228 U.S. Hwy. 19 North
Clearwater, Florida 33761
www.lbsonline.com
Pinellas: (727) 784-3965
Pasco: (727) 842-7635
Fax: (727) 784-8153
tradcliffe@lbsonline.com
Oct-16-00 09:34A L 10'/.'S Baur & Stevens
7277.9::53
CiTY Ufl CLhAKWAThK
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
~UNICIPAL SERVICES BUlLOJl'.;G. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. 2'" ROOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
. This rorm must be submitted 'or all appllCJIlions ror ntsi~ential uses. accessory uses, nonresidenfial uses. rences
Slllns. vesled nghts. development agreements. seawalls, docb. marinas and oilier marine struc1ullJls and home occupati;ns.
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER, AND AGENT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT NAME: Florida Marine & Resort Developers, Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS 2435 U.S. Hwv 19, Suite 350, Holiday, Florida 34691
PHONE NUMBER (727) 942-0733 FAX NUMBER i727) 944-3711
PROPERTY OWNERS Jim Dan Incorporated, a Florida Corporation
(List all owners)
JRrinto C~stpllRno & Elena Betes
AGENT NAME Donald L. HRrri 1]
MAILING ADDRESS
670 IslRnd WRY #305,
on) 4!1?-'1?R?
Clearwater, Florida 33767
FMNUMBER: (727)E~~~-~~1 J
PHONE NUMBER
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS:
gOO Nnrth nQ('PoJ ~ AUenl1P} r.J P.o1r1.1;:] t pr , Flchrin8
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto
See Exhihit "R" Rtt8rhpd hprpt:o
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL NUMBER:
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: Spp F.xhi'hit "r" .o1tt::whpn hprptn
(number 01 dwelling unilS, helte! rooms or square rootage or nonresidential use)
SIZE OF SITE:
B.Rg acres
See Exhibit "D" attached hereto
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS? YES _ NO l
I, the undersigned. acknowledge that all
representations made in this application
are true and accurate to the best of my
knowled
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL~S
sworlJ!:J~d before me ths I' Y--h- day of
,A.D.. to me and/or
by 0 is personaUv
~S. produced. fjI2.... as
pfication_ '1/ .... lr ,
l LD..>Utrt - XA..JL/
Notary public.
my commlss""J'~"'~: Maureen 1 Peck
l,,~~"".'if':.
=..0;. .if September 24, 2004
. --( D" -%~OF',,-<$'- ...Jl.! QNDEDTHRUTROYfAININSURA~~E,~ r.t
ZONING: J I ) '-./ '",,,,,,.., FU,TURE DESIGNATION: 'i.. 12. ~ ._
NORTH:{JHOt, AfIlItSOUTH I J L- EAST: '- WEST H"",.~,,'-.c.
l v U ,
FUTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACEfJTF'ARCELS: NORTH: EAST:'':'''' WEST: rrql:!v.
$.J
FOR PLANNING OFFICE USE ONLY:
LAND USE DISTRICT OF PARCEL:
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PARCELS
s: application fOlmsfdevelopment review/baSIC aippijC'atfon:doc
P.02
I'........"." ,..'
q.~ "~,,r.
',:(';1 '.
,"':;::... -' ,....,.: - ~'
(~
"'-J'
'-.i
\);1
~:;
,
bI
~
VI
,
-'~''''
\f\
\\\
OCT 20 '00 15:24 GB
....t,.
928 766060
~
TO:
P01
.
CITY O' CLEARWATER
AmOAVlT TO AurHOJUD AGINT
,tANNIN(; .. DIVII..ONINr tIIMCa AlMllU'ftAf1QN
a4~"'AI. .'itCtlIUaCMNe. 5OO!IIUftt M'tI\'\~ -'vtlNut. ,... .\oOOIt
..... {'PIt)...... fAk~ ."S1I
~ v
1.-, 12l"j~~l"~4tJlllaon
--E.l..ea. D..rl;!.'"
....,.~....,... . UEn T .
.A YU
-
-A
~ ..dIl:I
-
t. ,... (I... ..~.. DWrIIfft) 1M 'HOld WIle ~t)"" ~ ~..._ ~:
_?~ ~r~h ~eola "~;te, elearw.~t1'l nO~l~A ....
..-.
.....
---
Ll .."......
.... W""
J .boIIlio..
-
..4.t:.-
v ~.""wMr
..
J7l .& T
- ..
2. .,...... ,.,~ ~$__ the PftltMIrty ,. ...... ......... .., a:
tor r.or.-tfsidtntiel parting
1~ t!.bn;t~rJQQ ~ th r.tpr~tlta l'etai1! rista1J,ant. a c;.e.
ri
. ....~
...
, ,................. (haJIIMYf) '_1_... ~ AMI)...... .. ~.
DQnalrlLL EAI'r.:Ul .
..........~...~..........,~- 1 - ,""-
<t. ,.... __-" -.. ..... toiNMe.. C4tr ef -:.... .1tL .l'IettIIlO 1W~'" .._
...... -&::nal'~; ..-"'~ .
I """CIillo~ 1IIf.......... ......,. ~ CIIliIY'" ..~~
r~.'~
~ I 1.~-----
/f. .f. 11
~ . I.... .-...-"-- '.'7'. { ...1
, P .: 111------ If' It
lilt.. /) 7'-'-1"4-
j' 1 /---.._~::::
,
......allllJ.
.-.n. ......
'0-'1" '............1I..........~"U.~~.,-....... ,3() ...
~~._N":.:.Gl.:.=....~~'1. ~ ~+~~--.MA..._~.
)\ .' ~/ !)-to
o I \ ) ..-' \, \..... ~
....--' .,IIl'O(,"-- ,~.::-;,
-- _NIl
_t.dx '. ~.
J.__I'I. J
._-----~---,,-,
.,~......~ -1'"''lI(1O~''''''' ------r-=.:.:aJ-~../~ Geraldine M BurkE'
-~"" n 17;:-.1 ~,' *My Commission CC80302i
Ie. Yr.. \~..\\. \~.JI.I \.r..~.-~\.... \ "".t\~ Expirp-s February 20, 2003
O . \~..)~.\J)\.~:::, ~\ ..~J...:~- , t
< r:-....-' .-.".--
'\\
I
;l _.._--
l--------
PLAN 1-..1 It, \C::. g,
erN OF.
,.. ,- '- - -~ -...=--'."-;:::- - - -. -
~ --~
,.~) ! :'~ d (, I \ i i ~ ..,., · . ,~ ~,
'~t\.\l;~
_ ~_~. _ 1 __ _ .!- __ _:,,_' ... ~ L. ... _ .,
. ." J) ~ ': . THis INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO:
I ~ \ \ \. ~ I ' ' " l' '.' ?' ,'." \ f ~ ,I
;f T I ,.J... I. 'I FREEDOM TITlE AGENCV/INC,
... {(~' j'1' ~SrC~~d'S~"" ' I
), \.\. L' U. 'd.~..v. 'li"~Fl\ i375S' j. j . ~
'tJ " r ) \ . . \ > " I t I I ~ \ , , , '\
. . Iii , . P'o~y ,,.pP."~I.PlrctlldlnIKiCltlon (Folio) Numbers:
{' " . ~ ' f , .- . Og/~9/15An8~/~02/00,11
I (~ -: : ( ,. : 'Grant... SS II: it; -
. \),T .~,.., \
. \, ) J I . ) t ~\ ; 1 '1.,' } i " , ' ,\ I
J' ... : ~ '/l J ~ ~ .J
, THIS WARRANTY, DEED,'rnade' thl 1 Hh elIy or March, A,D, 1999 by Sara l. Stickier, II single woman, herein
eillld'lh~' grl~tor: I; J.clnto:Cutellano and Elena Betes. husband snd wIfe whoso pOSI ortico eddress is 906 &
908 N.:OIc:'~O,latAy!n~,,!e, Clea~wate~, FL 33755, herllnlh~ cllled (hi G,"~'lHlS:
,w.."..et. \I'.' "".Ift ~".,I','"'.. -,'1"'0'- ."'~ -".fth'. ~CJ...d. lH th, pltll,. 10 Ihl, Inllrum.nl ."H~ '''', !'I.lrl. Ilg'] flJH".'''.IIloy.. .II"d "I'g". tJI
,"d.y.DU.lI" .ft4111 tfl. .wtel"." '11' "'''''1 of C:01'O"IIO.l\I)
. '" t t , \ , "
W'I.:r N:E;.~'slEI,T H: ThI_llhl,grlntor. for Ind In conslderlllon 01 the sum of TEN AND OO/I00'S ($10.00) Doller5 end
other Vllulblt COf\sldtrlllonS. 'recllpt wh.rlof Is herlby IcI<nowledg.d. herlby grlnts, bargains, t ~lls. ellens. remises. releases,
conveys Ind Confirms.. unto th. grlnt.. III thlt elrtlln land SHUIII In PINELlAS County. Slale 01 Flortde, Vll:
. j -t >,:, ;
SEE' EXHIBh'tfA" ATTACHED~ HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
i ,t i.;/'! ' I
Subject to ea..ment.,'re.trlctlon. and reservallons of recordllnd to t8xell lor the year 1999 end
there.fter ,"
. i
.
INST . 99-0796~3
MAR II. 1999 i 6! 16~M
li ~:
\ ..
i PINELLAS COUNTY rLA,
Orr.REC.8K'I0437 PO 139
t .;
l,
. , 1
lP.4ca .ABO\I[.ltft'lllN! fOO AECX>fV>I~O DATA,
I';' 'l'-r,".-n
< 10, JO .!()_GETHER, w"h I~ thl ttn_tl, h..IdHI~11 Ind lppunenlnee, therllo belonging or In anywiso epper1Q1ninQ.
87r.co..~ ,.
'. . T.~ HAVE AND TO HOLD, thl lime In Itl Ilmplt lortvtr.
I' .
\' I
r.
..- ,....""....~.-------._~.,~-,. ~---.....-------~.....~---.
-~ ,
" .~ ,~,
i~--
,.~'\ I
,::-~\(~ L .:~il\c__~C_~.JJL.l.J i b- I
Sara L. Stickier : .. r'":';-.'- ._':~.. 'l ~ rr I
"~ Stclttvl, Cltlrwl'er, FL 3375S ' ~~~~.~_O I ~ i:~
!o <:{
~ [;1 (ft ~
" i',I"r,~,
. . ;
"~'_~"'.Y.l~\i<'\"'~ '.,.... "r........;'. '.
" i')" I l t " t. ?;, ! ' / ' i I . J ' . \ '
\.' ; '~ . ' . , I, '.' , '," ZUIIXT -^- P INELLAS, COUNTY FLA
>~.1,'~ ',', . ! t ,; OFF,REC.8K 10437 PG
~ ~ _..' _!,.. -- - ~, - - .. , _, ,., _, _ , -.. ,.. 140
;.1,\ 1:\ ~-.=."i/.~.~iJ,,~jl~".c.~.' ~t\.J~.r-~,i~l'.le~.,ot L<;r; \ 1,IUqck ~.J. A..
I l '- ~ f ',-..... I, t"'~,,'I<W:,:t ~,z;,41n9- J to lb. IMP; or plo t thG~f ..
~ ' "', .'l1lCO . -,.,\'IJi.!(,-I'~.. ~ 100"1' '1', , Pege ; tt. PUbl.ic Record. ot P1nell..
\ \. '/ ( ~ . . - e01aft .~ 'P.10it'U\"7 t," r .~ ' . I '
, ~, j '1< ~ " ~"'~J J ~/ l' ., ~"l ~. I , 'I
l \ i Ii J _ f"' ~~\ I., f f ~ ~ f -'.: _ r
f{" ,'.. f -I"~ J I Jf ' l \ i " > ' , " , ';~' i ,
; ,t; I", 1lr I H, ~ J) S; '<lJ"~ ( f \. ; I .,' I .( I; .' ' .
;,} \\:~"~T.Ile.' ,...tJ.~o~.(...t'O.fi/~~~h,.tl!S.O feet ot. Lot ,1. 11QC}( ~t J. ^.
1'\ ( , i J:uql ?'(lUaDrn.~~,) ~c.or,~> ,to the up' or plat the~ot ..
'.;" 'r oicfld "{nt1'1'.t/loOJl:f 1. hga U, Public ~.cord. ot P1n.lla.,
[ I 'CO\mty~' Plor1da! \ ~ .
; +. ~. ,~' .J -1 ~" t
~ .. 'r y,.. 11'
,
It
~ .
,
. ; ': '....: , f! l :
AL80 'JOfOWM AS: . '
~~~).~klW)'riJ,;'~~l~:'.Ol the, north 'lina of II:>t 1. eiOCk 2,
~.RMiSUPD;Y;@lQM~f";'~~~ .in Plctl!look,.l page ., o! ,1nellau
~$)~t:~\trtq~!itijtlil"M;IUI..1~.ekot: the '4.te,rly cUlb ana qutter on
\ o'~ol~lA~Ui..1!.rf4l~~ls~!':'c:. l!ort~ 8,', cS.~r.e. )9' 5'" W..t 2.25
.; t~~'>:1~o!~-V.f~nl61~~~tt*;i~.,' Nor~h . 89, ;dtt9~.e' 39' 57. Wellt 158.94
" f~tJto~'~.1~onc;:r.ti{~ht. aaid' ,1\Onua.nt lying South '9 degx-.."
3'A5..'~tl_~.d1,~aO~,\'\1'I',~~,t;'*frOllan 1r()~ ~lll on. laid Not'th line,
. t~!'~..~,80\it!lf~lt~~r",~ 1.0..'- E.18t ',~)~ll t..t to a concrete
1IOft~!,~':!t!i..nc.':l-.~thl":cS.gt"~ea 39' 5'7" ea.t 14).9. teet to back.
oft..S:4:w..t.~lY:tCUz'bt ',tJwnce North 14 ~ctgre". 12' 57" Ea.t 65.0
t..t'.loncr~'-.1d'c\lrbttoipo1nt ot ~q1nn1nq.
, .
r~~~~
Ilg1.ii..n....T
U U
l
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
l r-'" '
;)1 '\:,
I,';
I' .
: i
~ .: ~
i L..../)
iL~
,
j
, '
I, .
1: .
"
i" i,.'
t . 'j. ~ .~
I,
\
. .
. . ,
i ~
;
\ '
\
"~. \. ..... 1
\. "I
_____10!~7!2000 ~1~?2
~E~T ~/: F~aURSK:&~A=~:~L;
548075~
127 Q.14~71i j
DANIEL J GRIEdIIlSQ
OCT-iB-CO ~g:38;
PAGE 01
::IME 2/2
Oc~-l.-00 oe~~ L10varas Saur . Stevens
7271"'183
p.oe
.
CITY OF CL!ARWATER
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZI ACENT
PLANNDIC . lJIVILOIIlaCINT IaYICII ADMINlS11t4 nON
MVNtCIPAL lIIMC:a IUl:.DINC. 100 SOU'IM ~ 4V1NU~. z-.-1..OO6it
l'HONI (nJ)-Mz.... PAA ('m) ....
li~ [') I'i
~~.r;:j-.r ::
~iW OAn 1TIrnTpnt~~~1 A Fln~t~R rnrpnr~tinn
_..........~
,. TP4It (I MW'M ..) ItIa owner(l~ " rtcQId. hotW(.} of.. ~_A... dac:tlbN ~:
900 &, ~~o Nt ~pf.l111 ~QI'\LJA. G1ett\4a.~er. Flor~d.a
-~.....~
2, TNiI.. P'CC*t~ conttihMI Iht ~ fvr wNcn . fIQlMt fGt a.:
Flet:l.bb r-l~)npnept ~roval fo~ at~~cl:ied Qwelling8, ri?tall,
~* fi~eL marina and restl!l.urSI1t
~ "......
3. TMI h loNIII~ed (htIiftM~ ~ and (dattJdo) ~
Donald L. Harrill
......IIIIIiIIaJ. ___..,..... "... ..........., ......~
... .,... WI ....11 ... bH~ atcutlCllo iMuoI tIiI ~ of ClMN..,. . Ftw1cIIlo CGnIidIr and ect
Oft "'.... detcrlbed prol*tf;
50 TNt <"WI). I~ l.tIderJigMd luehl)tlty. r\e~ Clrafy 'Mt1he ~ itlrut Md conecl
--r~ Lu () /
......,....~U&. ./
,,~J;lf;,;-!, Roberta J. Walker
tt( h. "'f.'~Commissi()n # CO 890757
,:.~.\~.. g Expires Nov. 28,2003
:1-'" - .. ~Thru
"',.." 'W'iliiii.ir/!ing co., Inc.
~...
J'I!.. ...
......... ~ WI tffai 11Il/'J
fDcf .~.' ..~.........
.... _ "" ftMftt ~~...
g'~Ur'" 1M' 01l1li - If ,.'.;II~. I /..;.7 ~ ... Of
" ~ ... Nr ..."
coNItlI,
~
.. C"L. .1..........
.. ............" J d__.......................~,.
tr@~rw ~w
By _
-
e
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Parcel 1:
Lot 1 of Block 2, JA GORRA'S SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat
Book 1, page 44, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, excepting a portion being
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the North line of Lot 1, Block 2 aforesaid and the back of the
Westerly curb and gutter on Osceola Avenue and run thence N.89039'57"W., 2.25 feet to an iron
axle; thence N.89039'57"W., 158.94 feet to a concrete monument, said monument lying S.
89039'57"E., 120.19 feet from an iron axle of said North line; thence S.01 01 O'49"E., 63.11 feet to
a concrete monument; thence S.89039'57"E., 143.94 feet to the back of said Westerly curb;
thence N.14012'57"E., 65.00 feet along said curb to Point of Beginning.
All of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, JA GORRA'S SUBDIVISION, according to the plat therefore
recorded in Plat Book 1, page 44, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Also, Lots 13, 14,22 and 23 of SUE BARCO SUBDIVISION, according to the plat therefore
recorded in Plat Book 1, page 26, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Including the following portion of Lot 22, described as, beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 22
of SUE BARCO SUBDIVISION being recorded in Plat Book 1, page 26, of the Public Records of
Pinellas County; run thence Southerly along the East boundary of Lot 22, 30.0 feet; thence
N.89024'59"W., 136.63 feet; thence N.77000'39"W., 75.04 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence
continue N.77000'39'W., 497.63 feet; thence S.62039'09"E., 356.26 feet; thence N.72054'13"E.,
176.24 feet to the Point of Beginning. Together with all riparin rights and submerged lands
thereto appertaining and subject to an existing 30 inch storm sewer easement along and across
said property, together with the right to go upon said property for the purpose of repairing,
replacing and maintaining said storm sewer and
Less and except that portion of Lot 22 described as beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 22,
SUE BARCO SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 26 of the Public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida, and run thence Southerly along the East boundary of said Lot 22, 30.0
feet; thence N.89024'59"W., 136.63 feet; thence N.77000'39"W., 572.67 feet for a Point of
Beginning; thence continue N.77000'39"W., 309.67 feet; thence N.27"20'51"E., 76.79 feet; thence
S.62039'09"E., 300.00 feet for a Point of Beginning, together with all riparian rights and
submerged lands thereto appertaining.
Further less that part beginning at the point in the East boundary of Lot 22, 30.0 feet Southerly
along said boundary from the Lot's northeast corner; and run thence Southwesterly in a straight
line 136.63 feet to a point in the South boundary of said Lot, which is 131.8 feet Westerly along
said boundary from the Lot's Southeast corner; run thence Southeasterly along said boundary to
said Southeast corner; and thence Northerly along the Lot's East boundary, 29.56 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
Also, that part of an unnamed street unofficially known as Nicholson Street in the City of
Clearwater, Florida, begin Lot 3 of said JA GORRA'S SUBDIVISION on the North and Lots 13
and 23 of SUE BARCO SUBDIVISION on the South, and which les West of a straight line
extending from the Southeast corner of said Lot 3 to the Northeast corner of said Lot 13; and
ALSO that part of an unnamed street lying between Lots 13, 14 and 15 of SUE BARCO
SUBDIVISION on the East, and Lots 22 and 23 of said subdivision on the West, and North of a
straight line connecting the Southern boundaries of said Lots 15 and 22, and ALSO all land and
submerged lands adjacent to the property hereinbefore described and owned by CLEARWATER
-
e
From the Northeast corner of the Southwest % of Section 9, Township 29 South,
Pinellas County, Florida; run thence West 1226.61 feet; thence South 16.27 feet; thence
S.14045'32"W., 65.0 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence .89003'OO"W., 143.94 feet to a
concrete monument; thence N.00037'00'W., 63.11 feet to a concrete monument; thence
N.89010'02"W., 120.19 feet to an axle on the ordinary high water mark of Clearwater Bay; thence
along the seawall N.89026'34"W., 658.99 feet; thence along the Easterly right of way of the
Intercoastal Waterway S.10033'57"W., 247.76 feet; thence S.62039'09"E, 444.45 feet to a
concrete monument; thence N.72054'13"E., 176.24 feet to a concrete monument; thence
S.7rOO'39"E., 75.04 feet to a concrete monument; thence S.89024'59"E., 136.63 feet to a
concrete monument; thence S.15006'21 "W., 29.56 feet to a concrete monument; thence
S.7rOO'39"E., 30.0 feet to a concrete monument; thence N.1 0006'21 "E., 59.56 feet; thence
S.7rOO'39"E., 100.0 feet to a concrete monument; thence N.04052'52"E., 155.25 feet; thence
N.14035'13"E., 162.20 feet to a concrete monument; thence N.16010'34"E., 30.00 feet to a
concrete monument; thence N.1601 0'34"E., 30.00 feet to a concrete monument, being the Point
of Beginning; LESS the following described property beginning at the East % corner of Section 9,
Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida; and run thence West 1252.72 feet;
thence South 113.62 feet to a point on the Westerly right of way line of Osceola Avenue for a
Point of Beginning of a 10.0 feet wide easement area, said easement area extending 5.0 feet
either side of the following described centerline which bears N.75057'57"W., 139.83 feet, thence
N.44057'57"W., 80.0 feet; thence N.86030'19"W., 260.0 feet to the end of the said easement.
LESS canal right of way more particularly described as beginning at a point on the Easterly right
of way line of "Cut P-37" of the Intercoastal Waterway Canal marked by the point of intersection
of said Easterly right of way line with the "seawall" along the Northerly side of "Seminole Fill", said
point being 161.24 feet South and 2283.45 feet West of the East % corner of Section 9, Township
29 south, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, (coordinates of P.O.B., X-240, 746.74, Y-1,
324,297.27); thence run S.12009'33"W., along said Easterly right of way line 135.0 feet, more or
less, to the waters of "Clearwater Harbor"; thence meander the Easterly shore line of "Clearwater
Harbor" in a Northwesterly, Northerly and Easterly direction to the Point of Beginning.
Also that portion ofland being described as beginning at a point 11.55 feet South and 1507.98
feet West of the East % corner of Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, run
N.89047'23"W., 658.99 feet; thence S.10047'28''W., 25.43 feet; thence S.00012'37'W. 45.0 feet;
thence S.89047'23"E., 216.0 feet; thence N.00012'37"E., 20.0 feet; thence S.89047'23"E., thence
S.Oo012'37"W., 110.0 feet; thence S.86002'27"E., 260.0 feet; thence along the shore line to the
left, whose chord bears N.Or15'49"W., 178.51 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Parcel 2:
That part of Government Lots 2 and 3 of Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas
County, Florida described as follows:
From a Point of Beginning at Northeast corner of Block 2 of JA GORRA'S SUBDIVISION,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, page 44, of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida, run thence North 160 East along Westerly boundary line of Osceola Avenue.
99.54 feet more or less to Southwest corner of Intersection of said Westerly boundary line with
South boundary line of Cedar Street; thence West, along said South boundary line. 64.91 feet;
thence Southwesterly parallel to said Westerly boundary line of said Osceola Avenue. 97.22 feet
more or less to a point on North boundary line of said Block 2, of said JA GORRA'S
SUBDIVISION; thence East along said North boundary line, 65 feet to the Point of Beginning.
LESS that portion of above described tract lying Westerly of a line described as follows:
e
e
Commencing at Northeast corner of said Block 2 of JA GORRA'S SUBDIVISION; run thence
West along North line of said subdivision, 50.15 feet to a Point of Beginning of said line; thence
Northerly 97.22 feet more or less to a point in South boundary line of Cedar Street; said point
being 64.91 feet West of Southwest corner of said Cedar Street and Osceola Avenue, said point
also being the Point of Ending of said described line.
Parcel 3:
Lots 1,2, 3, 8 and 9 in FT BLISH SUBDIVISION, Clearwater Florida, according to the map or
plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, page 27, of the Public Records of Pinellas County.
Parcel 4:
The West 150 feet of the East Yz of the North 66 feet of the South Yz of the Northwest % of the
Northwest % of the Northeast % of Section 33, Township 31 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas
County, Florida.
Parcel 5:
Lot 1 of SUE BARCO SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as the same appears
of record of Plat Book 1, page 26, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Parcel 6:
Lot 10 of F.T. BLISH SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as the same appears of
record in Plat Book 1, page 27, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Parcel 7:
Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 10 of F.T. BLISH SUBDIVISION, according to the
plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, page 27, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida;
thence run Westerly along the projection of the Northerly line of said Lot 10,23.7 feet; thence
Southerly along the Easterly right-of-way line of Osceola Avenue as it existed August 30, 1939
and now exists, 46 feet; thence Easterly along the projection of the Southerly Line of said Lot 10,
12 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot Ten; thence Northerly along the Westerly boundary
of said Lot 10, 50.064 feet to Point of Beginning.
Parcel 8:
Lot 1, Block 2 of JA GORRA SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in
Plat Book 1, page 44, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
By
e
.
NAMES OF ALL PERSONS HAVING
CONTRACTUAL INTEREST IN PROPERTY
Donald L. Harrill
670 Island Way #305, Clearwater, Florida 33767
Gerald A. Figurski
2435 US. Highway 19, Suite 350, Holiday, Florida 34691
J. Ben Harrill
2435 US. Highway 19, Suite 350, Holiday, Florida 34691
~
Florida Mame & Resort Developers, Inc.
2435 US. Highway 19, Suite 350, Holiday, Florida 34691
WIiffi ~ ~ W
lay===--
e
PARCEL NUMBERS
09-29-15-02718-000-0130
09-29-15-02718-000-0230
09-29-15-32184-001-0010
09-29-15-32184-002-0020
09-29-15-09252-000-0010
09-29-15-32184-002-0011
EXHIBIT "B"
e
r~ilE G \TI 1
\\ =-\
\~ y --:::=::
-
.
A!!jacent Property Owners
City of Clearwater
112 South Osceloa Ave.
Clearwater, Florida
Pine lIas COlmty School Board
C/o Superintendent
301 4th S1. S. W., Largo, Florida
J ancinto Castelllano & Elena Betes
908 North Osceola Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Dr. & Mrs. S. R. Morgan
301 Cedar Street
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Moss Feaster Funeral Home
C/o SCI Funeral Services Corporation
Property Tax Department
P. O. Box 130548
Houston, Texas 77219-0548
Mr. Fred Allen
806 North Osceola Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Christine Kische- W olbrandt
303 Cedar Street
Clearwater, Florida 33755
ilf[[@ ~ 0 m 111~
U1J ' ~
By___
...
.
.
EXHIBIT "e"
(REVISED 11/13/00)
The applicant proposes to develop 140 attached dwellings in an eight (8) story structure
elevated over parking at a height not exceeding one hundred feet (100'). The project will include
a restaurant of seven thousand square feet, a ship's store/marina office of two thousand square
feet, an office building of four thousand five hundred square feet, a one hundred twelve wet slip
marina, and 381 parking spaces.
The project will consist of the redevelopment of the existing full service marina and
boatyard into an upscale Key West style village and marina. The present conceptual design of the
condominium structures calls for an eight story building over parking with a stucco exterior of a
light coral color accented by blue contrasting hip/mansard roofing and detailing. Each unit will
have balconies overlooking the bay. The restaurant and ship's store will be designed and
constructed in keeping with the project's Key West architecture and a color scheme matching the
condominium units.
A preliminary conceptual sketch of the Key West Village concept is attached hereto.
While the sketch has not received final approval from the owners, it does reflect, in concept, the
architectural character which the developer will seek to achieve in the redevelopment of the
project. In addition, while those existing buildings surrounding the project lack a central
architectural theme, the developer will attempt to successfully integrate the Key West Village
into the surrounding neighborhoods.
r...-'.."'..... i..-j \'\ n I.'-::::J r-....."......'\
'. i '/IIL"IO"
f""--"-. ".'. . '.1 ~ \ ..... '. r. ........J ':~.
IU~r- UVb11 \i
lnl[ I ~ l.cuG I~
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CtlY OF CLEARWATER
-
e
.
EXHIBIT "C"
~~~Cfl{DW ~W
IBY
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE /1
) t "
\./ ./
It""" "
The applicant proposes to develop 140 attached dwellings in an e~~ story structure
elevated over parking at a height not exceeding 150 feet. The project will include a restaurant of
7,500 square feet, a ship's store/marina office of2,500 square feet, a 112 wet slip marina, an office
building of 5,000 square feet and non-residential parking.
e
.
EXHIBIT "D"
l,i)~,:1"~,lr-@ . ~ ~ \fl~. ~'I
II r .... I
,I .'.
II..
IE3Y
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Applicant seeks flexible development approval for attached dwellings, retail, marina, office,
parking and restaurant for the subject property.
~
.
CLEARWATER BAY MARINA
i
I
~ ;,
PLANNING is'
SEF{\/iCES
! Cl1Y OF CLEt\fiWA,TER
B. Attached dwellinGs.
; I'; ;':
i il. ;'i
" II.'
I l."
[
Flexibility criteria:
1. Lot area and width: There is no reduction in lot area.
2. Location: There is no direct access to an arterial street.
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan because it allows
use of the land and its view to the fullest while at the same time
maintaining the marina. The marina will be more residential in nature.
Overall, the structures and site plan are consistent with the intent of the
Downtown District. Additional upscale residential and commercial
structures are an important component of a healthy mix of uses in this
area. These uses will also stabilize and support other service uses
nearby.
b. Parking will be located on the ground floor of the condominiums. The
increased height is necessary to allow this improvement of off-street
parking on the ground floor of the residential building.
4. Setbacks: There are no setback reductions requested.
5. Off-street parking: The application proposes a reduction in forty (40) spaces of
off-street parking, specifically in the spaces required for the marina. These
spaces will not be necessary in that forty (40) of the wet slips will be assigned
to the condominium buildings.
6. The Tourist District design gUidelines have not been written.
E. Marina facilities.
1. The parcel proposed for development is not located in the areas identified.
2. The marina facilities will be screened from the adjoining residential areas by
virtue of landscaping as shown on the site plan.
3. Setbacks: There are no setback reductions requested.
4. The Tourist District design gUidelines have not been written.
Page 1
CLEARWATER BAY MARINA
f,;:''-''. , 't~
_,'~,-' ,'-, <#'*1-""" \,~:: )
flJll" ',1.__/<:'
'I j
II I
! W
I
General Standards
PI,.j\r'H"Jl~~(J 8l\
-
1.
. . CITY OF: CLEJ'JlW/\ T!=R
The proposed development of the land will b~'-tliEL,._
scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in
which it is located.
The City's 1993 Periphery Plan identifies these parcels for a revitalized, high
density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities, conversion of the commercial marina and
boatyard to a more residential in nature marina, a restaurant, and an office.
It will establish a positive redevelopment precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the
appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or
significantly impair the value thereof.
The site is zoned Tourist with a small parcel being Medium Density Residential
District. All parcels are anticipated to be changed to Downtown District. The
proposed development will be in compliance with both zoning classifications.
The proposed development will help generate a better mix of residential and
pedestrian uses served by a quality restaurant.
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the
area. An expected increase in property value will have a beneficial affect on
surrounding property.
The proposed project is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the
waterfront and Clearwater Harbor. It is also intended to aid in the revitalization
of the downtown area. This location provides a unique opportunity to redevelop
a portion of Clearwater Harbor that is currently underutilized.
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the
area and downtown. The proposed development will play an important role in
the continuing revitalization of Downtown Clearwater. The City and its citizens
will benefit by having an attractive complex located in a redeveloping area. The
proposed uses and landscape enhancements will significantly improve the site.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or
safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the
proposed use.
The proposed uses are permitted in the zoning district, and should not create
any adverse health or safety impacts on the neighborhood. The plan proposes
the elimination over time of commercial boating and boat repair facilities which
Page 1
,.....
--
CITY OF
-
I ./J ,
CLEARWA.'TE
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DIVISION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
January 2, 2001
Mr. Donald Harrill
Florida Marine and Resort Developers, Inc.
670 Island Way #305
Clearwater, Florida 33767
RE: Development Order regarding case FL 00-10-46 - 880, 900 and 908 North
Osceola Avenue.
Dear Mr. Harrill:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.7 of the
Community Development Code. On December 12, 2000, the Community Development
Board reviewed your application for Flexible Development approval to increase the
height of attached dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet and to reduce the (north) side
setback from 10 feet to three feet (to an emergency access aisle), with a Comprehensive
Landscape Program. The proposal includes the redevelopment of the existing Clearwater
Marina to include a 140-unit condominium, 112-slip marina, a 7,000 square foot
restaurant, a 2,000 square foot retail shop, and a 4,500 square foot office.
Based on the application and the staff recommendation, the Board found that the proposal
is in compliance with the standards and criteria for a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, the maximum development potential standards and all other
applicable standards of the Community Development Code. The Community
Development Board approved the application subject to the following conditions:
1. That a building permit for either the attached dwellings or restaurant be submitted
within two years from approval of the site plan (December 12, 2002);
2. That the existing chain link fence along the south property line be replaced with a
decorative fence including masonry columns and metal grill work;
3. That a gate be installed along the south property line to prevent restaurant patrons
from parking at the Seminole Boat Ramp (City-owned) property;
4. That the existing curb cut along the west side of Ft. Harrison A venue be removed
and reflected on a revised site plan;
BRIAJ'\.) J. AUNGST) IvL\YOR<:OMlvUSSIONER
J.B. JOHNSON} VICE Ivl!\YOR-COi\,iivlISSIONER BOB CLARK) CO~i:'.iISSI00:ER
ED HART, COM~iISSIONER ED HOOPER, CmlM!SSIor<ER
EMPLOYMENT AND A.FFlfu\iATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Harrill, Page 2
880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue - Development Order
January 2, 2001
-
-
5. That all signage be integrated/coordinated with the building architecture and all
freestanding signs be limited to monument-style signs;
6. That the final design of all new buildings be architecturally coordinated and
consistent with the conceptual elevations as submitted;
7. That emergency access be provided to the south/west of the proposed
restaurant/retail buildings, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall, prior to issuance
of building permits;
8. That the cover for the boat slips along the east end of the marina be removed prior
to any building permits for the attached dwellings;
9. That the balconies and views of the northernmost bank of the condominium units be
oriented to the northwest, and the building line of the condominium adjacent to the
residential properties to the north shall extend no farther east than what is generally
shown on the sketch attached hereto as Exhibit A;
10. That no air conditioners or other mechanical equipment be located along the
northern and eastern property lines and that they be located on the roof, to the extent
feasible;
11. That there shall be no outdoor music or outdoor speakers at the proposed restaurant
on the property; and
12. That at such time as the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed
condominium building, the applicant shall install landscaping on the property
located at 301 Cedar Street (Morgan residence) generally consistent with the
landscaping plan attached hereto as Exhibit B (the property owners of 301 Cedar
Street will be responsible for the maintenance of same landscaping).
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (January 2, 2002). All required certificates of
occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community
Development Board may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity.
Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the
construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call W. Ryan Givens,
Planner at 727-562-4504.
Very truly yours,
tJ~~ Jv
Edward Mazur, Vice Chairman
Community Development Board
Cc: Gerald Figurski
Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Blackely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A.
Attachments as Noted (Exhibits A and B)
Harrill, Page 3
880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue - Development Order
January 2, 2001
e
-
140 UNITS
210 PARKING SPACES
12 STORIES OVER PARKING
2.8 ACRE ::I: SITE
/.:'~//'
.".....
.......
--.." .......... ...- .............-. -.......... .... "......-
"::.~:::' :::::;. .'
..::..::..::::..:::.::......
--------
------ -
SLIP AREA TO BE RENOVATED
(FOR USE OF CONDOMINIUM AREA)
(17 SLIPS)
Exhibit A
Harrill, Page 4
880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue - Development Order
January 2, 2001
tit
--
.. .
'. .
.......~.
.' 0 .' ...
1}2 ro~~ .5
': '..(IIff/:il5Mfillr)J~ /P-iz/er< .'ljf8.~~:' :
.- --'.' -"'-1-'--.-"'-' ....--. ..
. . .
. .- -"-'--' ,-- .-~--_. .-. .-. ----
'. ":" .':' Jtlb~ ~lciwd; . ..
?iil .~ sr; ". .
c.~M.~lL,..
.' ....' I.i)!;.' . ::'~,::' .'
: :.12.....~.,4l..
.:.. ~~...'~~::..
. ..... - .. ,.".. "-' ~/ti1. "-'~-"
Exhibit B
National Society
of
Professional Engineers
Florida Engineering
Society
American Society
of
Civil Engineers
Florida Surveying
and
Mapping Society
American Congress
on
Surveying and Mapping
Institute
of
Transportation Engineers
Florida Planning
and
Zoning Association
National Association
of
Environmental Professionals
.
.
()~~ Q~
,
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
January 8, 2001
Mr. Ryan Givens
Planning and Development Services
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Clearwater Bay Marina
Final Site Plan
Dear Mr. Given:
As requested, enclosed is one (1) set (24" x 36" - 5 sheets) of the Final Site Plan for the
captioned project. This plan has been revised to reflect the conditions of approval that were
imposed by the Community Development Board.
Please let us know if you have any questions or if you need any additional prints of this plan.
)
./
TEVENS
I 0) lE~[E~~t~1 D~
\1 :.
j; JAf~' -:::J \
L ~
PLANU!:~G & Dr:\',: _'_':-:;~,w~NT
:~[~l /;; ':=:~r
i
J~
enclosure
cc: Donald Harrill w/1 set of plans
Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire w/1 set of plans
Ben Harrill, Esquire w/1 set of plans
C(v ',.':: CUi
I .~. -.' ~:.~ c'{
29228 U.S, Hwy. 19 North
Clearwater, Florida 33761
www.lbsonline.com
Pinellas: (727) 784-3965
Pasco: (727) 842-7635
Fax: (727) 784-8153
~
I
I
_At'~~;r'HSSIOH \/E I
_ R"'CATION REPORT.
TIME
HAHE
FAX
TEL
12/05/20fl0 14: 5'_=1
F'lAH -
7~75524575
7..275524557
DATE,TIMF
F A>< HO. /HAME
DURA T I Ot-,J
PAC:iE (S)
RESULT
MODE
12/05 14:44
g452835~
80:14:04
25
OK
qAHDARD
NATURE SAVER'" FAX MEM "
r~-~..---- . 0 0 1616 I Date, '.' I " .
TO.. i:::-I:. . ------. -'~' I L..'.b 10-...."0; ",' 2 .~ ]
, ~cx. i-1-" . " , --r-~--'-c'~-"- '" pages"'" c:.
I_~~_I N\~""""P. "".... . From ")L-. _"_,_..,~,,__,.,,...___~J
Co./Dept --_._~-L':::":L~7 I ILL' ' ""N"'j
1;;:6~~.03~~-s~~:~~~~~~=~1
_._...-"~~_.,,_.__._,,,..,,_..._J
l~~-e-<9'~ ~D0 IL.-\I"I"'o ~~
~L...
-z... yS-w+ ~ r~ -- iJ (2c cJLc.......J ~ ,DO" b '?;\>'"
'3) "5~ ~ - G\"'> ~
(h1..r ,AQ-
I- \- ~-- \'t.-\~~
...
01j~~ --,I
..--r-..L
"?'80 9 C::JO M D ~
I
~ lOSe ce..;o"lc.... ~
_I... . yAHSMI~-;qOH 'IE I
. '" RIFICATIC!H REPOPT.
I
DA!E,TIME
F Ai<. . HO. /NAME
~LJ~ATIC1H
FA(:AE (C;~
RE::;LIL T'
MIJDE
~__1f'~"-'=~--------~--\
N~~~~~.~~~~:.~~~.~~~~....O'~\~:~"\F,~~:~~\~i~~..~~r~.~~~__J~~
~o .\('\ \ \ __ ~ ' \ \ rom \=,\0... . \
. 1)::>r-o-- ()l- ~.. 0. . ... ."'.. ..........................~...~C._L~-....._....,\
GOm;,,--_.==-~.=JC~~-0~0:-s-'.3..---.
rp\~ __.___".._~. ~~.O.:.~.II~..~~~..1-:..:\~~1:_..__.\
~~;JIO:-~-:;' M \ \ fad j
L_~.~3.-'------------_._---
--.-------------------- --" -
----...--.--.-...-------.-----------...------.-.-------.-------..---
12,/05 14'-'--'
~9443711 .:;),1
L1D ~ ~lCI. '-:ICI
1 t:1. - Ll. .L,I_I
[]f.<
~3T Arm?\F'D
E(~r'", .
TH'lE .
t'W.'lE :
FA" .
TEL
1 ::~./ 01:,,/ 2~71n'7;
FU4H -- -- '.'
7275t,24"i7F=
7275El245Ej7
14:42
J //
'j
..--- ;--.....
I N........ U',." :T--{"-C..
l/
C;S~O e'l CD ~JI.,8 1" C Sc..c1<" ~+',
-I
1
I
i
I
I
.--J
,(..-
/..~./.
DATE, TIt-1E
F A>< rJo. ,/ HAHE
DURATIOH
PAGE C3)
RE~3UL T
MODE
~
AH:3MI'3O;::;IOH \iEF:IFIC:ATImj- R~F'iJRT .
~
TIME 12/06/2000 16:56
~jAME F'LAH
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275624567
12,/Ot, it,: 45
'j442::::7~:8
00:10:4E:
17
m<
'3T AHDAF;D
l
I
i
I
,
,
[
r
I
I
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER" FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727)562-4576
TO: :1e+.~ f'tl c\L~\ f, (-It:\
FAX: Y'--\ ':.) - :) <'73 'g
FROM:
S' \ \
()_i'-;, u~ ;-t-
< \
\ a-. J l:, \ (:) c~
~
5 (.;,2--. '-Ie;) ~L
DATE:
MESSAGE: <S.~.k/ . Cc-c<f~ +-i'_ .\~'-' \ 2-. \ \-2- Cu (~ ~.-
<s... L-r1~ l~~'fl"'- ~, . .
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) \ "1
LL -
:)
>-
f-
U
Updated as of 12/5/00
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Date: Tuesday, December 12,2000
Time: 1 :00 p.m.
Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor,
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
(City Hall Commission Chambers)
The City of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require
special accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. Kindly refrain from using
beepers, cellular telephones and other distracting devices during the meeting.
Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this Board must have a
record ofthe proceedings to support such appeal.
CALL TO ORDER, INVOCA TrON, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Chair Figurski
Vice-Chair Mazur
Gildersleeve
Johnson
Moran
Petersen
Plisko
City Staff
A. REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES: None
B. CONTINUED ITEMS:
1. Case: ANX 00-08-22 - 2217 South Lagoon Circle
Owner(s)/Applicant: John A. Shaw & Cathie A. Shaw.
Location: 0.14 acres located on the south side of Lagoon Circle South,
approximately 230 feet east of Belcher Road.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.14 acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from RL, Residential Low (County) to RL,
Residential Low Classification (Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning fi'om R-3, Single-Family Residential District (County) to LMDR,
Low Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Plam1er.
CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 1
2.
- -
Case: FL 00-08::'33 - 3006 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard
Owner: Thanh Phuoc Ngyuen.
Applicant: Michael S. Caruso.
Location: 0.28 acres located on the north side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard,
approximately 42 feet west of Meadow Lark Lane.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval of a nightclub within the Commercial
District, with a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 20 spaces
to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with
Comprehensive Landscape Program.
Proposed Use: A 2,132 square foot nightclub.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
3.
Case: FL 00-07-29 ~ 7 Rockaway Street
Owner: Ypapanti and Sevasti Alexiou.
Applicant: Kirk Construction.
Location: 0.38 acres located on the north side of Rockaway Street, approximately
500 feet west of Mandalay Avenue.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (north) setback
along Rockaway Street from 10 feet to zero feet, reduce the rear (south) setback
from 10 feet to zero feet, reduce the required number of parking spaces from 71
spaces to 13 parking spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Proj ect.
Proposed Use: A 3,487 square foot second-story addition to an existing
restaurant.
Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner.
c.
LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS:
1.
Case: Park Place Development of Regional Impact (DR!) amendment
Owner(s): Park Place Land, Ltd., c/o Clinton International Group, Inc.
Applicant: Tim Johnson.
Location: Generally between Drew Street and Gulf to Bay Boulevard, and U.S.
Highway 19 (frontage road) and Hampton Road.
Zoning: C, Commercial, IRT, Industrial Research and Technology, 0, Office,
and P, Preservation Districts.
Request: Notification of Proposed Change to the approved DR! to:
1. Reduce approved office and retail space;
2. Provide a land use conversion factor for multi-family and/or hotel
uses for Parcel 6 ofthe DRI; and
3. Extend the buildout date of the DRI by three years to December 31,
2003.
Presenter: Gary L. Jones, Senior Planner.
CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 2
D.
LEVEL TWO!PPLICATIONS:
-
1. Case: FL 00-10-36 - 3042 Geiger Court
Owner(s)/Applicant: Warren and Beth Wilson.
Location: 0.42 acres located on the north side of Geiger Court, approximately
500 feet east of Landmark Drive.
Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (west) setback from
15 feet to six feet and reduce the rear setback from 25 feet to 10 feet, as part of a
Residential Infill Proj ect.
Proposed Use: A 935 square foot, two-story addition to an existing 4,090 square
foot, single-family dwelling.
Presenter: Ryan Givens, Plmmer.
2. Case: FL 00-10-38 - 3164 San Pedro Street
Owner(s)/Applicant: Lawrence E. Boone.
Location: 0.25 acres located on the north side of San Pedro Street, approximately
175 feet east of Madera Avenue.
Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side (west) setback from
15 feet to 8.4 feet as part ofaResidential rnfill Project.
Proposed Use: A 304 square foot addition (storage) to an existing 2,400 square
foot single-family dwelling.
Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner.
3. Case: FL 00-10-39 - 1931 Oak Ridge Court
Owner: Joseph C. Patty, Jr.
Applicant: Hugh Grant.
Location: 0.53 acres located on the northeast comer of Oak Ridge Court and
Sunset Point Road.
Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the front (south) setback from
25 feet to 20 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project.
Proposed Use: A 495 square foot (front loading) garage addition to an existing
4,526 square foot single-family dwelling (with side loading garage).
Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner.
4. Case: FL 00-10-41- 3261 San Pedro Street
Owner/Applicant: John Breen.
Location: 0.26 acres located on the south side of San Pedro Street, approximately
150 feet west of Maximo Avenue.
Zoning: LDR, Low Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the side setback (east) fi-om
15 feet to 13 feet and to reduce the rear setback (south) from 25 feet to 23 feet, as
pari of a Residential Infill Project.
Proposed Use: A 647 square foot addition to an existing 1,750 square foot single-
family residence.
Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner.
CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 3
, 5.
7.
Case: FL 00-10!t - 105 South Myrtle Avenue fit
Owner: Glenn Warren.
Applicant: Business Records Management Inc.
Location: 0.68 acres located on the southeast comer of Park Street and Myrtle
Avenue.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval of a temporary records storage business
in the Downtown District not to exceed one year, as part of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project.
Proposed Use: An 8,847 square foot records storage establishment within a
10,000 square foot building.
Presenter: Ryan Givens, Plamler.
6.
Case: FL 00-10-40 1426 McMullen Booth Road
Owner/Applicant: La Canada Holding Company/James Rapp for Sunset
Mercantile Limited Partnership.
Location: 5.07 acres located on the west side of McMullen Booth Road,
approximately 1,200 feet south of SR 590.
Zoning: IRT, Industrial Research Technology District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a self-storage business in the
IR T District with a reduction in the required number of parking spaces from 174
spaces to 147 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
(amendment to approved site plan - June 20, 2000 Community Development
Board meeting).
Proposed Use: A 123,000 square foot self-storage establishment.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
Case: FL 00-10-37- 14 South Evergreen Avenue
Owner: Dennis and Rebecca Dunn and John and Anna Boyce.
Applicant: First Impressions.
Location: 0.14 acres located at the northwest comer of Park Street and South
Evergreen Avenue.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval of a light assembly establishment
within the Commercial District with a reduction in required parking from six
spaces to four spaces, as a Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project with
Comprehensive Landscape Program.
Proposed Use: A 1,600 square dental laboratory.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
CDB agenda - 12/12/00 - Page 4
E.
8.
- -
Case: FL 00-10-..;- / - 1825 Gulfto Bay Boulevard
Owner: Seydo Kurdi.
Applicant: Amscot Corporation.
Location: 0.30 acres located on the southeast comer of Virginia Avenue and
Gulf to Bay Boulevard.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a problematic use in the
Commercial District within a building which does not meet all the current land
development regulations and is located within 500 feet of another problematic
use, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with
Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Program.
Proposed Use: Check Cashing (problematic use) as part of a financial institution
with tax service and currency exchange.
Presenter: Mark T. Pan)', Planner.
9.
Case: FL 00-10-46 - 880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue
Owner(s): Jim Dan Incorporated, Jacinto Castellano & Elena Betes.
Applicant: Florida Marine and Resort Developers, Inc.
Location: 8.89 acres located on the west and east side of Osceola Avenue, west
of Fort Harrison Avenue (south of Nicholson Street).
Zoning: C, Commercial, MDR, Medium Density Residential District, P,
Preservation, and T, Tourist Districts.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of attached
dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet, reduce the side (north) setback from 10 feet to
three feet (to an emergency access lane) with a Comprehensive Landscape
Program.
Proposed Use: A 140-unit, laO-foot condominium building, a 7,000 square foot
restaurant, a 4,500 square foot office, a 2,000 square foot ship's store/marina
office, a 1 12-wet slip marina.
Presenter: Ryan Givens, Planner.
DIRECTOR'S ITEMS:
· Approval of minutes from November 21,2000 meeting
· Annexation, land use plan amendment and rezoning cases
F. ADJOURNMENT
S.\Planning DeparimelJilC D Blagcndas DI~C & CDBICDBI200011 2 Decemberlcdb agenda 121 200.doc
CDB agenda -- 12/12/00 - Page 5
tit
-
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
December 12, 2000
FL 00-10-46
D9
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Jim Dan Incorporated, Jacinto Castellano and Elena Betes
LOCATION:
880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to increase the height of
attached dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet and to reduce
the (north) side setback from 10 feet to three feet (to an
emergency access aisle), with a Comprehensive Landscape
Program.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan materials submitted by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
8.89 acres (4.52 submerged acres and 4.37 upland acres)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
The property is an irregular lot of approximately 400 feet
by 600 feet.
PROPERTY USE:
Current use:
Proposed use:
Marina, marina work bays, retail, cruise ship charter, dive
charter, sail charter and dry storage of boats
Attached dwellings, office, restaurant, retail and boat slips
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Classification
ZONING DISTRICTS:
T, Tourist District, MDR, Medium Density Residential
Distlict, P, Preservation District & C, Commercial District.
(Pending City-initiated rezoning to D, Downtown District
as pari of the Periphery Plan)
Page 1
-
-
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family
West: Clearwater Harbor
East: School and Office
South: Public Boat Ramp, Funeral Home and Theater
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mix of land uses including
single-family, office, retail, and public boat ramps.
ANALYSIS:
The parcel is 8.89 acres located north of downtown Clearwater and abuts Clearwater Harbor to
the west. Approximately 4.5 acres is submerged land and 4.37 acres is upland. The propelty is
located on a slopped bluff with a grade differential of approximately 23 feet. The parcel is
located approximately 200 feet north of Seminole Street and west of Ft. Hanison Avenue. The
north property line is bound by Nicholson Street and also extends north approximately 170 feet.
North Osceola A venue bisects the propelty and divides it into two distinct parcels.
Site Description
The property has array of existing structures. A small wood-frame house and a two-story garage
with a rental unit are located along northeast propelty line fronting North Osceola Avenue. Boat
repair and storage bays occupy the area along the north property line. There are continuous open
and covered boat slips in the water along the east end of the marina. The Sun Cruz charter boat
leases the site for docking and occupies a one-story, masonry building along the southern
property line. A 2,000 square-foot bait shop is located near the southwest corner of the property,
adjacent to the public boat ramp. The area between North Osceola Avenue and Ft. Harrison
A venue is occupied by a two-story masonry building and is presently being leased as apartments.
The property is almost entirely covered by asphalt. The vegetation along North Osceola Avenue
is poorly maintained. The overall site appearance is poor and is targeted for redevelopment
within the City's Periphery Plan.
Neighborhood Character
The surrounding character includes a mix of land uses. North Ward Elementary School is located
across Nicholson Street, northeast of the property. A mix of single-family and small multi-
family buildings are located along the northwest property boundary. A funeral home and the
Clearwater Little Theater are located along the southern propelty lines. The Seminole Street boat
launching ramp is adjacent to the southwest corner of the site. Generally, the area remains in fair
condition.
Land Use Regulations/ Periphery Plan
The City Commission adopted the Periphery Plan in 1993 for the area north of Jones Street,
south of Nicholson Street and west of the Pinellas Trail. It identified the vicinity as a redevelop-
ment area that has a locational advantage of being in the vicinity of the City's downtown. A land
use plan amendment was approved which designated the area as Central Business District on the
land use map. The appropriate Downtown zoning district was never applied to the area at the
time. The rezoning of this area to the Downtown zoning district is scheduled for review by the
Page 2
-
-
City Commission in February 2001. The Comprehensive Plan references the special area plan to
determine the intensity for development with a CBD land use classification. The Periphery Plan,
being the special area plan, allows a maximum density of 50 dwelling units per acre for parcels in
excess of two acres. The Plan allows a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.50 for nonresi-
dential uses. The Periphery Plan has been recommended for approval by the Community
Development Board and is scheduled for final disposition by the City Commission.
Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes a plan to transform the site into a mixed-use, Key West-style village and
marina setting. The redevelopment proposal includes a condominium building with 140 units, a
restaurant, retail space, an office building and 112 private boat slips. The existing wood-frame
house, two-story garage, and boat repair facilities will be removed and replaced with an eight-
story condominium building over a 210-space parking garage. The exterior will be light coral
colored stucco accented by blue contrasting hip/mansard roofing and detailing. Each unit will
have balconies overlooking the bay.
The Sun Cruz masonry building will be removed as will any eXIstIng charter services and
replaced with a 7,000 square-foot restaurant. The restaurant will include a deck that extends into
the private marina over the water. The existing retail shop will be remodeled and continue to
operate with the addition of the site's rental office. The restaurant and retail shop will be
designed and constructed in keeping with the project's Key West architecture and color scheme.
The two buildings are proposed approximately two feet from the south property line, adjacent to
the public boat ramps. The Fire Code requires that a minimum of a 20-foot emergency access
aisle be provided adjacent to the restaurant, retail/office building and the fuel facilities. As a
condition of approval, staff recommends this issue be addressed before the issuance of a building
permit for the restaurant and/or retail/office building. Additionally, the parking for the restaurant
must be provided on site and shall not impact the public boat ramp parking. As a solution, a
barrier should be constructed to prevent restaurant patrons from parking at the boat ramp
property.
The proposal includes renovating and retaInIng 112 boat slips; 40 slips reserved for the
condominium and 72 slips to be leased to the general public. Several existing boat slips will be
renovated to remove any covered docks. The existing 92 "high and dry" boat storage bays will be
eliminated. This will also improve the Fire Department's effectiveness to detain potential fires in
the attached dwellings. The two-story, masonry building along Ft. Harrison will be converted to a
larger 4,500 square feet office.
Two vehicular access points will be provided from North Osceola A venue; the northern-most
entrance will be restricted for resident use. The property adj acent to Ft. Harrison A venue is
accessible from North Osceola A venue and Ft. Hanison A venue. The existing masonry building
has a minimal setback along Ft. Harrison Avenue and creates site visibility constraints and traffic
hazards. Staff recommends that the curb cut along the Ft. Harrison road frontage be closed. A
designated pedestrian pathway is provided to allow residents to safely access North Osceola
Avenue and be separated from automobile access aisles. A six-foot sidewalk will be constructed
along the west side of North Osceola A venue.
Page 3
-
-
The proposed site intensity is consistent with the 1993 Periphery Plan and the proposed Peliphery
Plan 2000 update. The Periphery Plan allows for a floor area ratio of 0.5 and an allowable density
of 50 dwelling units per acre for prope11ies in excess of two acres. The site is 8.89 acres of which
the 4.37 of upland acreage will be used to calculate the project intensity. After calculating the
mixed-use fOlIDula, it was found that the site's development potential is not maximized with
respect to density by 47 dwelling units. In other words, the proposed project meets the density
and intensity requirements and does not utilize all of its development potential. (Refer to the
table below that illustrates the mixed-use land intensity calculation.)
. .. . II
Uland Acreaae 4.37 acres (190,357 s uare feet)
Floor Area Ratio 0.5
Density
27,000 square
13,500 square feet of feet of land
Required land for 0.5 Floor Area proposed 0.5 X 13,500 = (0.61 acres) is
nonresidential uses Ratio is allowed nomesidential uses 27,000 required for
nomesidential
uses
163,357
190,357 square 27,000 square feet of square feet of
Remaining land to feet of upland land land is required for 190,357 - land (3.75
calculation density area (4.37 acres) nomesidential uses 27,000 = acres) remains
163,357 to calculate
densit
3.75 acres 187 dwelling
Allowable density (163,357 square 50 dwelling units per units is
calculation feet) remains to acre is allowed 3.75 X 50 = 187 permitted on
calculate density the remaining
land area
Summary
187 dwelling units
are allowed
140 dwelling unit are
proposed
187-140=47
Request
The request is to increase the height of the condominium building from 35 feet to 100 feet and to
reduce the (north) side setback from 10 feet to three feet for an emergency access aisle. The
request also includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program. The other elements of the proposal
do not require approval from the Community Development Board.
The Tourist District allows flexibility with regard to height as pm1 of a Flexible Development
application for a maximum of 100 feet. Height is measured from the mean elevation of the
existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or midpoint of the peak/eave of the
main pitched roof. The request is for 100 feet above the base flood elevation.
Page 4
-
e
The property is located on a slopped surface with a grade differential of approximately 23 feet.
The land adjacent to the water is approximately six feet above sea level; whereas, the land
adj acent to Ft. Harrison A venue has an elevation of 29 feet. As seen from Ft. Harrison A venue
looking west, the proposed building height will be perceived at 77 feet due to the natural
topography.
The general vicinity, specifically along Clearwater Harbor, is a focus for redevelopment. Two
blocks to the south, the Harbor Bluffs waterfront condominium development has a height of
approximately 100 feet. South of Georgia Street, the Osceola Bay Club development was
approved in June 2000 for a height of 150 feet. The Belvedere Apartments just north of Jones
Street has an approximate height of 75 feet. The Downtown District (to which the site will be
rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The proposed height
is consistent with other development in the vicinity and will be consistent with a downtown
character as recommended in the Periphery Plan.
The reduction in the side setback from 10 feet to three feet is requested for a 30-foot emergency
vehicle access aisle along the north side of the condominium building. Due to the building
design, the parking layout and the nalTOW lot size, the emergency aisle could not be relocated and
must encroach the side setback. The increased building height, side setback reduction and
comprehensive landscape program are justified by the quality conceptual design, its consistency
with the Plan's objectives and the unique lot shape.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
The site has a history of code enforcement violations and complaints. These items include noise
created by generators, parking problems and extended hours of operation. The proposal is
expected to COlTect previous Code Enforcement problems by creating more compatible land uses
to the adjacent residential and school properties.
Page 5
-
e
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARDS
IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT:
IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE
RATIO*
* The property is located in a special area plan referred to as the Periphery Plan; Development
potential standards are reflected based on the Periphery Plan.
STANDARD
FLOOR AREA
RA TIO*
DENSITY*
PERMITTED/ EXISTING
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE
?
0.5 (95,178
s uare feet)
50 dwelling units
per acre (218
uni ts )
0.95
0.15 (29,658
s uare feet)
o units
0.07 (13,500
s uare feet)
140 units
Yes
Yes
0.56
0.85
Yes
B. FLEXIBILE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT:
o spaces - 210 spaces _
residential; residential; 381
189 spaces - spaces - total
entire site site
* The rear setback is measured from the rear property line to the nearest structure; the rear property line extends
into Clearwater Harbor approximately 440 feet from the attached dwellings.
STANDARD
LOT AREA
minimum
LOT WIDTH
minimum
HEIGHT
maximum
FRONT YARD
SETBACK
minimum
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
minimum
REAR YARD
SETBACK
minimum
PARKING
SPACES
minimum
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
5,000 - 10,000 387,248 square 387,248 square Yes
s uare feet feet - entire site feet - entire site
50 - 100 feet 400 feet 400 feet Yes
35 - 100 feet 30 feet 100 feet Yes
o - 15 feet 10 feet 25 feet Yes
o - 10 feet
2 feet
3 feet
Yes
10 - 20 feet
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
1.5 per unit-
Attached
Dwellings
Yes
Page 6
-
e
C. T, TOURIST DISTRICT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ATTACHED
DWELLINGS:
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The proposal does not involve a reduction in lot area or lot width.
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct
access to an arterial street.
There are no arterial streets contiguous the attached dwellings on this site. Osceola
A venue is a local street. The existing curb cut onto Ft. Harrison A venue for the office
building is recommended to be closed as part of a condition of approval.
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and
appearance.
The increase in height from 35 feet to 100 feet will result in an improved site plan
and appearance. The conceptual building design elevation includes a tiered, Key
West design with pitched, metal roofs, a stucco fa~ade, and numerous windows.
The increased height is consistent with the goals and policies expressed in the
draft Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan 2000 Update to designate the
waterfront as high-density residential. The proposal is consistent with a downtown
area.
b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street
parking on the ground floor of the residential building.
The majority of the required residential parking will be placed under the building.
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic
street life.
There are no proposed front setback reductions as part of this proposal.
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance.
There are no proposed front setback reductions as part of this proposal.
Page 7
-
-
c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of
any building by emergency vehicles.
There is a 30-foot emergency vehicle access lane along the nOlth property line that
necessitates the three-foot side setback reduction.
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design and appearance.
The reduction in the north side setback is required to locate a 30-foot emergency
access lane. The building itself will not require a reduction in setbacks.
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely
uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for
storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature
of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to
dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation.
The parking provided exceeds the requirements of Code. The proposal is
integrated into a redevelopment area that intends to enhance a pedestrian
environment. The proposal provides identified pedestrian access to the property.
b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed
and constructed to create a street level fa<<;ade comparable to the
architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking
on the ground level.
The ground floor parking is intended to match the architectural character of the
upper inhabitable areas. A condition of approval will ensure this requirement is
met.
6. The design of the building complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
Design guidelines have not yet been adopted for the TOUlist District.
Page 8
-
e
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized by a mix of land uses including single-family
dwellings and small-scale attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery
Plan includes a revitalized, high density residential extension of downtown. This
proposal includes high end condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a
positive redevelopment precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The property is located with in the boundaries of the Periphery Plan. The Plan
recommends that the immediate vicinity be rezoned to D, Downtown District and the
properties west of Osceola and south of Seminole Street should be redevelopment as
multi-story, attached dwellings. Redevelopment of this site as proposed is consistent
with the Plan's objectives.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposal will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed condominiums, restaurant and retail space will have two ingress/egress
points of access from Osceola A venue. The proposed office building to the east will
have one ingress/egress point from Osceola A venue and the existing curb cut along Ft.
Harrison is recommended to be closed. Sunounding local streets are aligned in a grid
pattern and will provide alternate traffic routes. There are designated pedestrian aisles
and improved public sidewalks to encourage nonmotorized transportation alternatives.
Additionally, the proposal is a mix-use development that will distIibute vehicle trips at
varying times of the day.
Page 9
-
e
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The site is located within a redevelopment area as defined in the Periphery Plan. The
Plan 2000 update intends that this site be redeveloped as a mixed-use waterfront
development. The proposed development is consistent with the objectives and goals of
the Plan. The high-density, multi-story design is compatible with previously approved
developments to the south including Osceola Bay Club and Harbor Bluffs waterfront
condominiums.
6. The design of the proposed development mInImIzes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent
properties.
The conceptual building includes a tiered design that minimizes the appearance of bulk.
The property is approximately 23 feet lower than the land to the east near Ft. Harrison,
whereas, the 100-foot building height will be perceived to be lower due to the slope of
the property (approximately 77-feet) from adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on November 6, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development
will further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the areas near Downtown.
The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to
increase the height of attached dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet and to reduce the (north) side
setback from 10 feet to three feet (to an emergency access lane), and a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, for the property at 880, 900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue with the following
conditions:
1. That a building permit for either the attached dwellings or restaurant be submitted within
two years from approval of the site plan;
2. That the existing chain link fence along the south property line be replaced with a
decorative fence including masonry columns and metal grills;
3. That a gate be installed along the south property line to prevent restaurant patrons from
parking at the Seminole Boat Ramp property;
4. That the existing curb cut along the west side of Ft. Hanison A venue be removed and
reflected on a revised site plan;
5. That all signage be integrated/coordinated with the building architecture and all
freestanding signs be limited to monument-style signs;
6. That the final design of all new buildings be architecturally coordinated and consistent
with the conceptual elevations as submitted;
Page 10
-
e
7. That emergency access be provided to the south/west of the proposed restaurant/retail
buildings, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall, prior to issuance of building permits; and
8. That the cover for the boat slips along the east end of the marina be removed prior to any
building permits for the attached dwellings.
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
Page 11
II
~.
~ele-arwater
FAX
o
TO:
Thomas Radcliffe
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
FAX: 727-784-8153
FROM:
Ryan Givens '=~- (=~
TELEPHONE:
TELEPHONE:
727-784-3965
727-562-4504
SUBJECT: Clearwater Marina Project - Site Plan Revisions
NUMBER OF PAGES
INCLUDING COVER:
DATE:
January 2, 2001
The following lists the conditions of approval imposed by the Community Development Board.
Please provide a revised site plan to reflect the list of conditions. Additionally, the conditions should
be listed on the final site plan. The conditions are as follows:
1. That a building permit for either the attached dwellings or restaurant be submitted within two
years from approval of the site plan (December 12, 2002);
2. That the existing chain link fence along the south property line be replaced with a decorative
fence including masonry columns and metal grill work;
3. That a gate be installed along the south property line to prevent restaurant patrons from parking
at the Seminole Boat Ramp (City-owned) property;
4. That the existing curb cut along the west side of Ft. Harrison Avenue be removed and reflected
on a revised site plan;
5. That all signage be integrated/coordinated with the building architecture and all freestanding
signs be limited to monument-style signs;
6. That the final design of all new buildings be architecturally coordinated and consistent with the
conceptual elevations as submitted;
7. That emergency access be provided to the south/west of the proposed restaurantlretail buildings, to
the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall, prior to issuance of building permits;
8. That the cover for the boat slips along the east end of the marina be removed prior to any building
permits for the attached dwellings;
9. That the balconies and views of the northernmost bank of the condominium units be oriented to the
northwest, and the building line of the condominium adjacent to the residential properties to the
north shall extend no farther east than what is generally shown on the sketch attached hereto as
Exhibit A;
10. That no air conditioners or other mechanical equipment be located along the northern and eastern
property lines and that they be located on the roof, to the extent feasible;
11. That there shall be no outdoor music or outdoor speakers at the proposed restaurant on the
property; and
12. That at such time as the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed condominium
building, the applicant shall install landscaping on the property located at 301 Cedar Street
(Morgan residence) generally consistent with the landscaping plan attached hereto as Exhibit B
(the property owners of 301 Cedar Street will be responsible for the maintenance of same
landscaping).
~.
It
-
Florida Marine & Resort Development
Corporation
November 13, 2000
Mr. W. Ryan Givens
Planner
City of Clearwater
Planning & Development Services
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33756
PLANNING S. OEVELOPMENT
SEFl\!\CES
- E' "", VATC:P
CliY or- CL l,t\1< ,~,.,
Dear Ryan:
The following is my written response to your letter of November 7,2000, regarding our
development activities at the Clearwater Bay Marina:
SITE PLAN
1. The site plan data table has been adjusted to reflect the proper parking
requirements and the boat slips have been depicted as planned.
2. Our engineers have addressed the set back on the North portion to accommodate
the fire requirements. At the restaurant on the south side, we are desirous of
continuing the existing conditions, which currently allow access.
3. The plans have been adjusted to reflect a location for residential garbage
collection, as requested.
4. The restaurant and bait shop dumpster will be accessed as is currently
accomplished on the site.
5. The requested fire hydrant has been added to the design of the residential
building.
6. Two fire hydrants have been added to support the restaurant.
7. A sprinkler system is reflected for the bait shop and restaurant.
8. All gates are presented to have accessible lock boxes.
9. Our plans have been changed to reflect the requested sidewalks for Osceola and
Nicholson.
10. Wheel stops have been provided for all parking spaces and bollards have been
added for all spaces against the seawall.
11. The existing condition has been continued for parking adjacent to the boat slips
due to space constraints. No walkway is proposed, however, dock improvements
may include a boardwalk type walkway on the seawall. We will continue to study
this to determine if additional sidewalk space can be provided.
12. Pedestrian access from the site to Osceola Ave. has been provided.
13. Mention of a joint use agreement with the city has been eliminated from the plans.
e
.
Page two:
14. Storm water requirements for the parcel ofland lying east of North Osceola
Avenue have been previously addressed and is existing. The Florida Department
of Environmental Protection due to the less intense use of the site will waive all
water quantity and quality requirements for the area west of North Osceola
Avenue. In accordance with the requirements of Mike Quillian, P .E. at our
October 10,2000 meeting there are no city attenuation requirements because of
the direct outfall and water quality concerns will be met using "smart box" inlets
prior to outfall. Drainage calculations will only be required for pipe sizing which
will be addressed by both the engineer and city staff as part of the final
construction plans.
15. All parking is presented to meet code requirements.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
Our landscape plan has been adjusted to reflect the size plants and tress as required by
code. Additionally, we have made provisions to preserve the tree on the northeast side of
the parcel.
ELEVATION PLANS
A revised cross section of the building is being provided. In addition, you are being
provided an updated narrative description of the building elevation.
MISCELANEOUS INFORMATION
1. We have attempted to meet all code requirements in our submittal.
2. An original of our owner affidavit is included in this submittal.
3. Proof of ownership is included in this submittal.
4. The drawings indicate the areas of project phasing. Phase 1 is the bait shop and
will begin within a year. Phase two is the office building and Marina area and will
begin within two years.. Phase three is the restaurant and will begin within three
years. Phase four is the condominiums and will begin within four years.
5. Trip calculations are being provided on sheet one of the site plan.
6. Open space fee amounts will be provided the city.
7. Transportation impact fee calculations will be reviewed with the appropriate city
staff
8. The DEP has been contacted and does not currently require any permits.
Submittals will be made to DEP for the restaurant and any additional slips
requested.
.
.
Page three
9. Current gas operations are in compliance. The current operation will be continued
or removed as we determine its importance to the plan.
You will receive the fifteen (15) copies of the material requested. I am hopeful this
response is sufficient to facilitate our being scheduled for Community Development
Board review, Should you need additional questions answered, please call me at (407)
421-4188.
~IY'
~~:(~
President
670 Island Way~ #305~ Cleamater~ Florida 33767
Phone: (407) 421-4188
r
-
;t!earwater
FAX
u
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
TO:
J eny Figurski
FAX:
TELEPHONE:
944-3711
942-0733
FROM:
Ryan Givens
TELEPHONE:
727 -562-4504
SUBJECT: Resubmittal Date for 880 & 900 Osceola Avenue
NUMBER OF PAGES
INCLUDING COVER: 1
DATE:
November 7,2000
I previously faxed to you a copy of the DRC comments for the proposal at 880 & 900
Osceola Avenue; however, I fail to mention the resubmittal date. I need 15 copies of the
complete, revised application package no later than Monday, November 13, 2000 so that I
may complete a staff report and forward all the materials to the Community Development
Board and the City Clerk. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at 727-562-4504. Thank you.
e
~;~earwater
FAX
o
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
Ryan Givens
FAX:
TELEPHONE:
TELEPHONE:
944-3711
TO:
Jerry Figuski
942-0733
FROM:
727-562-4504
SUBJECT: DRC Comments for 880 & 900 Osceola Avenue
DATE:
November 7,2000
NUMBER OF PAGES
INCLUDING COVER:
Attached is the letter that was faxed and mailed to Mr. Harrill on November 7, 2000. The
letter highlights the comments as discussed at the November 6,2000 Development Review
Committee meeting. If you have any questions please call me, Ryan Givens, Planner, at
727-562-4504. Thank you.
CJf~r~ra'0/c
/J.it;:\''!lfiftJD
':1,_~;;~;;'~f;-~ I
I)' ~i)q'----:- \ , 1/
j:~:-TJ~, -- ( ~
~"_'jI, r'.J't.
"~\ .,.~ f7"~~' - <,
-:-~ ~YPrf~\~ -{ V;~~'
7.l H h~ Fb /((1Y-~
'/~nJ~r
e'
CITY
OF
c
e
LEARWATER
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
November 7, 2000
Donald L. Harrill
670 Island Way #305
Clearwater, Florida 33767
RE: Development Review Committee comments for 900 & 880 North Osceola Avenue (FL
00-10-46).
Dear Mr. Harrill:
The Development Review Committee has reviewed your submittal for the property
located at 900 & 880 North Osceola Avenue and determined that several revisions are
needed before the Community Development Board meeting and issuance of a
Development Order. The following lists the Development Review Committee request for
reVISIOns:
SITE PLAN
1. The site data table is not entirely correct; revise table with the following corrections:
a. Attached dwellings have a parking requirement of 1.5 spaces per unit; revise table
to reflect the correct parking requirement.
b. Include the number and size of existing and proposed boat slips.
2. A reduction in the side setback is permitted in the Tourist District whereas reduction
does not prevent access from emergency vehicles; revise site plan to allow a
minimum of 20 feet of clearance along the north property line adjacent to the condo
and along the south property line adjacent to the proposed restaurant.
3. The site plan does not identify a proper area for residential garbage collection; revise
plan to illustrate an appropriate staging area for garbage collection.
4. The restaurant and bait shop dumpster shall be stored in an dumpster enclosure and
accessible to waste management vehicles; revise plans to show the location, access
and design of the enclosure.
5. One additional fire hydrant is needed along the west end of the residential building;
revise plan to provide an additional hydrant.
6. Two hydrants are needed for the restaurant (one within 40 feet for fire depaIiment
connection, the other within 300 feet of the building); revise site plan to provide
additional hydrants.
7. The restaurant and bait shop is requirement to provide sprinkler systems; note this
requirement on the site plan.
8. All buildings and gates mus8!MNYje~8SG~!iv<f,&bR_c8~~~stm~requirement on the site plan.
J,B. JOHNSON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER BOB CL-\RK, COMMISSIONER
ED HART, COMi\HSSIONER ED HOOPER, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYJvIENT Al'm AFFIRi\L"-T1YE ACTION EMPLOYER"
880 & 900 North Osceola Pahe - page 2 .a .
Development ReVIew Co~e comments - November 7, 2000 _
9. Sidewalks are required on both sides of Osceola Avenue and Nicholson Street that
abut the parcel; revise site plan to provide a six-foot sidewalk along adjacent rights-
of-way.
10. Wheel stops shall be provided for all parking spaces; revise site plan to provide wheel
stops for all on-site parking with additional safety provisions along the water.
11. A sidewalk is needed for boat slip patrons; revise site plan to provide adequate
pedestrian access to the boat slips and prevent access between automobiles.
12. There is no pedestrian access from the site to Osceola A venue; revise plan to provide
a designated pedestIian pathway from the site to Osceola A venue. Include a
pedestrian gate along the east property line.
13. The site plan indicates a joint use parking agreement with the City parcel to the
south; secure an agreement with the City prior to the Community Development Board
meeting or remove the note from the site plan.
14. Drainage requirements are applicable to this proposal; provide drainage calculations
prior to building permit.
15. All parking must meet Code; ensure site plan meets Code requirements.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
1. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO FOLLOW
2. The landscape plan does not meet the Code requirements for plant/tree SIze and
caliper; revise plan to meet or exceed City standards.
3. There is a 3S-inch oak tree in the middle of the parking lot at the east side of the
parcel; revise landscape plan to ensure this tree is preserved.
ELEVATION PLAN
1. Provide a cross section that will accurately relate the building height to the area's
topography. Show how the building's height will be perceived from Ft. Harrison.
2. Provide a better conceptual elevation design.
3. Provide a written description of the proposed building design.
MISC INFORMATION
1. Each use must meet all the criteria listed in the Code; provide a written response to
each of the criteria listed in the Code. (see attached)
2. An original Affidavit of Authorization is needed for Flexible applications; provide
appropriate documentation that grants authorization to act as an agent for the property
owner.
3. Proof of ownership is needed for all site plan applications; provide a deed or other
legal documentation as proof of ownership.
4. The site plan identifies the project to be completed in phases; attach specific time
frames for each construction phase.
5. The proposal may negatively affect the capacity of adjacent roadways; provide trip
generation information for this proposal.
6. Open Space and Recreation Fees are due prior to Community Development Board
approval; pay fees prior to the CDB meeting. Contact Debbie Richter, Administrative
Analyst, at 562-4817 for an exact fee calculation.
, 880 & 900 North Osceola -A.lue ~ page 3 .. i
Development Review Co~e comments - November 7,2000 ..
7. Traffic Impact Fees are due prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; pay
fees prior to C.O. Contact Mike Gust, Traffic Operations Engineer, at 562-4775 for an
exact fee calculation.
8. A D.E.P permit is needed for the restaurant and boat slips.
9. Gas operations must comply with NFP A 30A and NFP A 30; submit documentation
that the proposal is in compliance.
In addition to specific requested revisions, please respond to the above items in writing.
Fifteen (15) copies of the site plan and all other application materials are needed for
resubmittal and will be forwarded to the Community Development Board. It should be
noted that additional revisions might be requested at a later date. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Thank you for your interest
and investment in the City of Clearwater.
s~el yours,
#~'#"")' ,
,?Ifita" ~< an Givens
/ " lanner
J '
FLEXIBLE DEVEL(.ENT CRITERIA - TOURIST DI.IST (the following
criteria was takenfrom the City of Clearwater Community Development Code)
I I. Restaurants.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
3. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved
design and appearance;
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless the sign is a part of a comprehensi ve sign
program;
5. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic
street life;
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear
of any building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved design and appearance;
6. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces
per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant
portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-
generating purposes;
b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the
number of off-street parking spaces;
c. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by
all existing land uses within 1.000 feet of the parcel proposed for
development. or parking is available through any existing or
_ned and committed parking facilitie.the shared parking
formula in Article 3, Division 14.
7. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3.
J K. Retail sales and services.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
3. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design
and appearance;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic
street life;
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear setbacks does not prevent access to the rear
of any building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and/or rear setbacks results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved design and appearance.
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteIistics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces
per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant
portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-
parking demand-generating purposes.
b. Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there is a high probability
that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the
automobile to access the use;
c. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by
all existing land uses within 1.000 feet of the parcel proposed for
development, or parking is available through any existing or
.ned and committed parking facilities ae shared parking
formula in Article 3, Division 14.
6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3.
FLEXIBLE DEVEL(~ENT CRITERIA - TOURIST DI.IST (the following
criteria was taken from the City of Clearwater Community Development Code)
I J. Restaurants.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct
access to a major alierial street;
3. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved
design and appearance;
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless the sign is a part of a comprehensive sign
program;
5. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic
street life;
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear
of any building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved design and appearance;
6. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces
per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant
portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-
generating purposes;
b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the
number of off-street parking spaces;
c. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by
all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for
development, or parking is available through any existing or
&ed and committed parking facilitie.he shared parking
formula in Article 3, Division 14.
7. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist
District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3.
J K. Retail sales and services.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
3. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design
and appearance;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic
street life;
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear setbacks does not prevent access to the rear
of any building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and/or rear setbacks results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved design and appearance.
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that
the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces
per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant
portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-
parking demand-generating purposes.
b. Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there is a high probability
that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the
automobile to access the use;
c. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by
all existing land uses within 1.000 feet of the parcel proposed for
development, or parking is available through any existing or
'-ned and committed parking facilities.he shared parking
formula in Article 3, Division 14. .
6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist
District design guidelines in Division 5 of A11icle 3.
National Society
of
Professional Engineers
Florida Engineering
Society
American Society
of
Civil Engineers
Florida Surveying
and
Mapping Society
American Congress
on
Surveying and Mapping
Institute
of
Transportation Engineers
Florida Planning
and
Zoning Association
National Association
of
Environmental Professionals
-
e
(;)aWt-~ Q~
,
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
October 30, 2000
Ms. Lisa L. Fierce
Development Review Manager
Central Permitting Department
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
PLANN!t!C-; :1 DEVELOPMENJ
SERViCES '
CTY OF CLEARWATER
Re: Clearwater Bay Marina
Proposed Mixed Use Development
Preliminary Site Plan
Dear Ms. Fierce:
Enclosed please find thirteen (13) sets (24" x 36" - 5 sheets) of the revised Preliminary Site
Plan for the captioned project.
Please let us know if you have any questions or if you need any additional information.
Very truly yours,
LLOVE~S, BAU~~~S YENS
~ //4~~
;:;:: 4;/ ~/;- .
Thomas G. Radcliffe, PE
TGR:mc/fierce I
enclosures
cc: Donald Harrill w/l set of Preliminary Site Plan
Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire w/l set of Preliminary Site Plan
Ben Harrill, Esquire w/l set of Preliminary Site Plan
29228 U.S. Hwy. 19 North
Clearwater, Florida 33761
www.lbsonline.com
Pinellas: (727) 784-3965
Pasco: (727) 842-7635
Fax: (727) 784-8153
National Society
of
Professional Engineers
Florida Engineering
Society
American Society
of
Civil Engineers
Florida Surveying
and
Mapping Society
American Congress
on
Surveying and Mapping
Institute
of
Transportation Engineers
Florida Planning
and
Zoning Association
National Association
of
Environmental Professionals
~
e
()aWt-cmJ. Q~
,
Engineers - Surveyors - Planners
October 19,2000
Ie l:n r'~"l rr~.
L~J} ~
Ms. Lisa L. Fierce
Development Review Manager
Central Permitting Department
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Clearwater Bay Marina
Proposed Mixed Use Development
Preliminary Site Plan
Dear Ms. Fierce:
Enclosed please find the following information in support ofthe captioned project.
1. Thirteen (13) sets (24" x 36" - 5 sheets) of the Preliminary Site Plan.
2. One (1) endorsed copy of the City of Clearwater Application for Site Plan Approval.
3. One (1) copy of the City of Clearwater Affidavit to Authorize Agent.
4. One (1) copy of the list of adjacent property owners.
5. One (1) copy of the names of all persons having contractual interest in the property.
6. A review fee check in the amount of$450.00 made payable to the City of Clearwater.
Please let us know if you have any questions or if you need any additional information.
Very truly yours,
LLOVERAS, BAUR AND~TEVENS
~ /';:?--;~/ .- ~)
/ /- / /j':/ l~
, / / ~ ....,-~ - .-:- .,.'
~ //"/---IYJ
~ 7)V~
Thomas G. Radcliffe, PE
TGR:mc/fierce
enclosures
cc: Donald Harrill w/enclosures
29228 U.S. Hwy. 19 North
Clearwater, Florida 33761
www.lbsonline.com
Pinellas: (727) 784-3965
Pasco: (727) 842-7635
Fax: (727) 784-8153
--~
It
It
CDB Meeting Date: December 12, 2000
Case Number: FL 00-10-46
Agenda Item: D9
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Jim Dan Incorporated, Jacinto Castellano and Elena Betes
LOCATION:
880, 900 and 908 NOlih Osceola Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to increase the height of
attached dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet and to reduce
the (north) side setback from 10 feet to three feet (to an
emergency access aisle), with a Comprehensive Landscape
Program.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan materials submitted by Lloveras, Baur & Stevens
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
8.89 acres (4.52 submerged acres and 4.37 upland acres)
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
The property is an inegular lot of approximately 400 feet
by 600 feet.
PROPERTY USE:
Cunent use:
Proposed use:
Marina, marina work bays, retail, cruise ship charter, dive
charter, sail charier and dry storage of boats
Attached dwellings, office, restaurant, retail and boat slips
PLAN CATEGORY:
CBD, Central Business District Classification
ZONING DISTRICTS:
T, Tourist District, MDR, Medium Density Residential
District, P, Preservation District & C, Commercial District.
(Pending City-initiated rezoning to D, Downtown District
as part of the Periphery Plan)
Page 1
e
--
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family
West: Clearwater Harbor
East: School and Office
South: Public Boat Ramp, Funeral Home and Theater
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The immediate vicinity is a mix of land uses including
single-family, office, retail, and public boat ramps.
ANALYSIS:
The parcel is 8.89 acres located north of downtown Clearwater and abuts Clearwater Harbor to
the west. Approximately 4.5 acres is submerged land and 4.37 acres is upland. The property is
located on a slopped bluff with a grade differential of approximately 23 feet. The parcel is
located approximately 200 feet north of Seminole Street and west of Ft. Harrison A venue. The
north property line is bound by Nicholson Street and also extends north approximately 170 feet.
North Osceola Avenue bisects the propelty and divides it into two distinct parcels.
Site Description
The property has array of existing structures. A small wood-frame house and a two-story garage
with a rental unit are located along northeast property line fronting North Osceola A venue. Boat
repair and storage bays occupy the area along the north property line. There are continuous open
and covered boat slips in the water along the east end of the marina. The Sun Cruz charter boat
leases the site for docking and occupies a one-story, masonry building along the southern
property line. A 2,000 square-foot bait shop is located near the southwest comer of the property,
adjacent to the public boat ramp. The area between North Osceola Avenue and Ft. Harrison
Avenue is occupied by a two-story masonry building and is presently being leased as apartments.
The property is almost entirely covered by asphalt. The vegetation along North Osceola Avenue
is poorly maintained. The overall site appearance is poor and is targeted for redevelopment
within the City's Periphery Plan.
Neighborhood Character
The surrounding character includes a mix of land uses. North Ward Elementary School is located
across Nicholson Street, northeast of the property. A mix of single-family and small multi-
family buildings are located along the northwest propelty boundary. A funeral home and the
Clearwater Little Theater are located along the southern propelty lines. The Seminole Street boat
launching ramp is adjacent to the southwest comer of the site. Generally, the area remains in fair
condition.
Land Use Regulations/ Periphery Plan
The City Commission adopted the Periphery Plan in 1993 for the area north of Jones Street,
south of Nicholson Street and west of the Pinellas Trail. It identified the vicinity as a redevelop-
ment area that has a locational advantage of being in the vicinity of the City's downtown. A land
use plan amendment was approved which designated the area as Central Business Distlict on the
land use map. The appropriate Downtown zoning district was never applied to the area at the
time. The rezoning of this area to the Downtown zoning distlict is scheduled for review by the
Page 2
.
It
City Commission in February 2001. The Comprehensive Plan references the special area plan to
determine the intensity for development with a CBD land use classification. The Periphery Plan,
being the special area plan, allows a maximum density of 50 dwelling units per acre for parcels in
excess of two acres. The Plan allows a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.50 for nonresi-
dential uses. The Periphery Plan has been recommended for approval by the Community
Development Board and is scheduled for final disposition by the City Commission.
Site Plan Summary
The proposal includes a plan to transform the site into a mixed-use, Key West-style village and
marina setting. The redevelopment proposal includes a condominium building with 140 units, a
restaurant, retail space, an office building and 112 private boat slips. The existing wood-frame
house, two-story garage, and boat repair facilities will be removed and replaced with an eight-
story condominium building over a 21O-space parking garage. The exterior will be light coral
colored stucco accented by blue contrasting hip/mansard roofing and detailing. Each unit will
have balconies overlooking the bay.
The Sun Cruz masonry building will be removed as will any eXlstmg charter services and
replaced with a 7,000 square-foot restaurant. The restaurant will include a deck that extends into
the private marina over the water. The existing retail shop will be remodeled and continue to
operate with the addition of the site's rental office. The restaurant and retail shop will be
designed and constructed in keeping with the project's Key West architecture and color scheme.
The two buildings are proposed approximately two feet from the south property line, adjacent to
the public boat ramps. The Fire Code requires that a minimum of a 20-foot emergency access
aisle be provided adjacent to the restaurant, retail/office building and the fuel facilities. As a
condition of approval, staff recommends this issue be addressed before the issuance of a building
permit for the restaurant and/or retail/office building. Additionally, the parking for the restaurant
must be provided on site and shall not impact the public boat ramp parking. As a solution, a
barrier should be constructed to prevent restaurant patrons from parking at the boat ramp
property.
The proposal includes renovating and retammg 112 boat slips; 40 slips reserved for the
condominium and 72 slips to be leased to the general public. Several existing boat slips will be
renovated to remove any covered docks. The existing 92 "high and dry" boat storage bays will be
eliminated. This will also improve the Fire Department's effectiveness to detain potential fires in
the attached dwellings. The two-story, masonry building along Ft. Harrison will be converted to a
larger 4,500 square feet office.
Two vehicular access points will be provided from North Osceola Avenue; the northern-most
entrance will be restricted for resident use. The property adj acent to Ft. Harrison A venue is
accessible from North Osceola Avenue and Ft. Harrison A venue. The existing masonry building
has a minimal setback along Ft. Harrison A venue and creates site visibility constraints and traffic
hazards. Staff recommends that the curb cut along the Ft. Harrison road frontage be closed. A
designated pedestrian pathway is provided to allow residents to safely access North Osceola
Avenue and be separated from automobile access aisles. A six-foot sidewalk will be constructed
along the west side of North Osceola Avenue.
Page 3
e
e
The proposed site intensity is consistent with the 1993 Periphery Plan and the proposed Periphery
Plan 2000 update. The Periphery Plan allows for a floor area ratio of 0.5 and an allowable density
of 50 dwelling units per acre for properties in excess of two acres. The site is 8.89 acres of which
the 4.37 of upland acreage will be used to calculate the project intensity. After calculating the
mixed-use formula, it was found that the site's development potential is not maximized with
respect to density by 47 dwelling units. In other words, the proposed project meets the density
and intensity requirements and does not utilize all of its development potential. (Refer to the
table below that illustrates the mixed-use land intensity calculation.)
Land Intensity Calculation for Mixed-use Development
Uland Acrea ae
Floor Area Ratio
Densit
4.37 acres (190,357 s uare feet)
0.5
50 dwellina units er acre
27,000 square
13,500 square feet of feet of land
Required landfor 0.5 Floor Area 0.5 X 13,500 = (0.61 acres) is
nonresidential uses Ratio is allowed proposed 27,000 required for
nonresidential uses nonresidential
uses
163,357
190,357 square 27,000 square feet of square feet of
Remaining land to feet of upland land land is required for 190,357 - land (3.75
calculation density area (4.37 acres) nonresidential uses 27,000 = acres) remains
163,357 to calculate
densit
3.75 acres 187 dwelling
Allowable density (163,357 square 50 dwelling units per units is
calculation feet) remains to acre is allowed 3.75 X 50 = 187 permitted on
calculate density the remaining
land area
Summary
187 dwelling units
are allowed
140 dwelling unit are
proposed
187-140=47
Request
The request is to increase the height of the condominium building from 35 feet to 100 feet and to
reduce the (north) side setback from 10 feet to three feet for an emergency access aisle. The
request also includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program. The other elements of the proposal
do not require approval from the Community Development Board.
The Tourist Distlict allows flexibility with regard to height as patt of a Flexible Development
application for a maximum of 100 feet. Height is measured from the mean elevation of the
existing grade to the highest finished roof surface (flat roofs) or midpoint of the peak/eave of the
main pitched roof. The request is for 100 feet above the base flood elevation.
Page 4
e
--
The property is located on a slopped surface with a grade differential of approximately 23 feet.
The land adjacent to the water is approximately six feet above sea level; whereas, the land
adjacent to Ft. Harrison A venue has an elevation of 29 feet. As seen from Ft. Harrison A venue
looking west, the proposed building height will be perceived at 77 feet due to the natural
topography.
The general vicinity, specifically along Clearwater Harbor, is a focus for redevelopment. Two
blocks to the south, the Harbor Bluffs waterfront condominium development has a height of
approximately 100 feet. South of Georgia Street, the Osceola Bay Club development was
approved in June 2000 for a height of 150 feet. The Belvedere Apartments just north of Jones
Street has an approximate height of 75 feet. The Downtown District (to which the site will be
rezoned) permits up to 150 feet for sites which front on Clearwater Harbor. The proposed height
is consistent with other development in the vicinity and will be consistent with a downtown
character as recommended in the Periphery Plan.
The reduction in the side setback from 10 feet to three feet is requested for a 30-foot emergency
vehicle access aisle along the north side of the condominium building. Due to the building
design, the parking layout and the narrow lot size, the emergency aisle could not be relocated and
must encroach the side setback. The increased building height, side setback reduction and
comprehensive landscape program are justified by the quality conceptual design, its consistency
with the Plan's objectives and the unique lot shape.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
The site has a history of code enforcement violations and complaints. These items include noise
created by generators, parking problems and extended hours of operation. The proposal is
expected to correct previous Code Enforcement problems by creating more compatible land uses
to the adjacent residential and school properties.
Page 5
e
-
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARDS
IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT:
STANDARD
PERMITTED/ EXISTING
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE
?
Development potential for the entire 4.37 upland acres
FLOOR AREA
RATIO*
DENSITY*
0.5 (95,178
s uare feet)
50 dwelling units
per acre (218
uni ts )
0.95
0.15 (29,658
s uare feet)
o units
0.07 (13,500
s uare feet)
140 units
Yes
Yes
Yes
IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE
RA TIO*
* The property is located in a special area plan referred to as the Periphery Plan; Development
potential standards are reflected based on the Periphery Plan.
0.56
0.85
B. FLEXIBILE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE T, TOURIST DISTRICT:
STANDARD
minimum
LOT WIDTH
minimum
HEIGHT
maximum
FRONT YARD
SETBACK
minimum
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
minimum
REAR YARD
SETBACK
minimum
PARKING
SPACES
minimum
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
387,248 square 387,248 square
feet - entire site feet - entire site
50 - 100 feet 400 feet 400 feet Yes
35 - 100 feet 30 feet 100 feet Yes
o - 15 feet 10 feet 25 feet Yes
o - 10 feet
10 - 20 feet
1.5 per unit -
Attached
Dwellings
2 feet
3 feet
o spaces - 210 spaces -
residential; residential; 381
189 spaces - spaces - total
entire site site
* The rear setback is measured from the rear property line to the nearest structure; the rear property line extends
into Clearwater Harbor approximately 440 feet from the attached dwellings.
N/A*
N/A*
Page 6
Yes
N/A*
Yes
e
e
C. T, TOURIST DISTRICT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR ATTACHED
DWELLINGS:
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The proposal does not involve a reduction in lot area or lot width.
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct
access to an arterial street.
There are no arterial streets contiguous the attached dwellings on this site. Osceola
Avenue is a local street. The existing curb cut onto Ft. Harrison A venue for the office
building is recommended to be closed as part of a condition of approval.
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and
appearance.
The increase in height from 35 feet to 100 feet will result in an improved site plan
and appearance. The conceptual building design elevation includes a tiered, Key
West design with pitched, metal roofs, a stucco fa9ade, and numerous windows.
The increased height is consistent with the goals and policies expressed in the
draft Downtown Clearwater Periphery Plan 2000 Update to designate the
waterfront as high-density residential. The proposal is consistent with a downtown
area.
b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street
parking on the ground floor of the residential building.
The majority of the required residential parking will be placed under the building.
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic
street life.
There are no proposed front setback reductions as patt of this proposal.
b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved
design and appearance.
There are no proposed front setback reductions as part of this proposal.
Page 7
e
It
c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of
any building by emergency vehicles.
There is a 3D-foot emergency vehicle access lane along the north property line that
necessitates the three-foot side setback reduction.
d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design and appearance.
The reduction in the north side setback is required to locate a 3D-foot emergency
access lane. The building itself will not require a reduction in setbacks.
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely
uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than
otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for
storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature
of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to
dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation.
The parking provided exceeds the requirements of Code. The proposal is
integrated into a redevelopment area that intends to enhance a pedestrian
environment. The proposal provides identified pedestrian access to the property.
b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed
and constructed to create a street level fa~ade comparable to the
architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking
on the ground level.
The ground floor parking is intended to match the architectural character of the
upper inhabitable areas. A condition of approval will ensure this requirement is
met.
6. The design of the building complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
Design guidelines have not yet been adopted for the Tourist District.
Page 8
-
e
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized by a mix of land uses including single-family
dwellings and small-scale attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery
Plan includes a revitalized, high density residential extension of downtown. This
proposal includes high end condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a
positive redevelopment precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The property is located with in the boundaries of the Periphery Plan. The Plan
recommends that the immediate vicinity be rezoned to D, Downtown District and the
properties west of Osceola and south of Seminole Street should be redevelopment as
multi-story, attached dwellings. Redevelopment of this site as proposed is consistent
with the Plan's objectives.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposal will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed condominiums, restaurant and retail space will have two ingress/egress
points of access from Osceola A venue. The proposed office building to the east will
have one ingress/egress point from Osceola A venue and the existing curb cut along Ft.
Harrison is recommended to be closed. Surrounding local streets are aligned in a grid
pattern and will provide alternate traffic routes. There are designated pedestrian aisles
and improved public sidewalks to encourage nonmotOlized transportation alternatives.
Additionally, the proposal is a mix-use development that will distribute vehicle hips at
varying times of the day.
Page 9
-
e
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The site is located within a redevelopment area as defined in the Periphery Plan. The
Plan 2000 update intends that this site be redeveloped as a mixed-use waterfront
development. The proposed development is consistent with the objectives and goals of
the Plan. The high-density, multi-story design is compatible with previously approved
developments to the south including Osceola Bay Club and Harbor Bluffs waterfront
condominiums.
6. The design of the proposed development mInImIZeS adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent
properties.
The conceptual building includes a tiered design that minimizes the appearance of bulk.
The property is approximately 23 feet lower than the land to the east near Ft. Harrison,
whereas, the 100-foot building height will be perceived to be lower due to the slope of
the property (approximately 77-feet) from adjacent properties.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on November 6, 2000. The applicant has worked with staff to provide an attractive, well-
designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development
will further the City's goals of improving the character of area and promoting the private sector
investment in the areas near Downtown.
The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to
increase the height of attached dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet and to reduce the (north) side
setback from 10 feet to three feet (to an emergency access lane), and a Comprehensive Landscape
Program, for the property at 880, 900 and 908 North Osceola A venue with the following
conditions:
1. That a building permit for either the attached dwellings or restaurant be submitted within
two years from approval of the site plan;
2. That the existing chain link fence along the south property line be replaced with a
decorative fence including masonry columns and metal grills;
3. That a gate be installed along the south property line to prevent restaurant patrons from
parking at the Seminole Boat Ramp property;
4. That the existing curb cut along the west side of Ft. HalTison Avenue be removed and
reflected on a revised site plan;
5. That all signage be integrated/coordinated with the building architecture and all
freestanding signs be limited to monument-style signs;
6. That the final design of all new buildings be architecturally coordinated and consistent
with the conceptual elevations as submitted;
Page 10
e
e
7. That emergency access be provided to the south/west of the proposed restaurantlretail
buildings, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall, prior to issuance of building permits; and
8. That the cover for the boat slips along the east end of the marina be removed prior to any
building permits for the attached dwellings.
Prepared by: W. Ryan Givens
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
Page 11
It
.
- i-f11
I \,,('
1 Jl,-
T'
J[I
if iI'
II 1:-1
Ju lLJ
}\ R
/~,. 1_11_1 ;,~1,~, D
.r~_ "_ ..~___ Jt \..
PW'll'HNG DEPf\Ji\TMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLOPJDA 33758-4748
NluNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLOPJDA .33756
'TELEPHmTE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RAI'iGE PINmiNG
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
July 31,2002
Mr. Don L. Harrill
Decade 80-XIV
900 North Osceola A venue
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: Occupational License for boat sales at Clearwater Bay Marina - 900 North Osceola
A venue
Dear Mr. Harrill:
The above addressed property is zoned Downtown District with an underlying land use
designation of CBD, Central Business District category. The site is also governed by the City's
Periphery Plan, You have inquired about obtaining an Occupational License for a dealer's
license to sell boats stored in the existing wet slips or dry storage facilities. Your letter, dated
July 12, 2002, also states that banks occasionally seek your assistance in selling boats acquired
through foreclosure.
I understand you are not seeking approval of the formal use of the property for vehicle sales.
You may be aware that vehicle sales (including boats) is not a permitted use in the Downtown
District. This use may be requested through a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
application, if all criteria in the Community Development Code and Periphery Plan are met.
Your request to secure an Occupational License for boat dealer use will be approved, because it
is historically associated with the existing marina facility, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the sale of boats and trailers be limited as an accessory use of the propelty and not
evolve into a boat (new or used) and trailer sales establishment;
2. That location of the boats and trailers for sale be restricted to the existing wet slips or dry
storage facilities at the marina (no additional display);
3. That there be no signs identifying the sale of boats/trailers on the property; and
4. That the occupational license for boat sales at the subject propelty be valid
contemporaneously with the use of the site as an approved marina.
"~D }-IART) \/1C1:::
;_~~O\T :::"':iA),IILT01\\ COiI1r.lt;SIONER
, :......0\[ iISSIOi\iEE
3lLL j OJ\:SOi\ I ::=O;"iii-1ISSIONER
:;~:i\:'IPLOY~/.\EI\JT AND A.FFIPj'vu\TfliE _rCTION EI\IIPLOY1~}(
--,
e
e
Harrill
July 31, 2002 - Page Two
Please submit an occupational license application. Copies are available through the
Development Services Department. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at
727-562-4561.
sa . Fierce
Assistant Planning Director
Cc: Development Review Staff
Dee Shawan and Barbara Sexsmith, Occupational License Inspectors
Case file FL 00-10-46
S:\Planning Department\zoning Itrs\900 N. Osceola Ave.doc
--
e
Decade 80- XIV
900 North Osceola Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Phone: (727) 443-3207 Fax: (727) 443-3349
July 12, 2002
Mrs. Lisa Fierce
Assistant Planning Director
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33758
Re: Request for License
Dear Lisa,
Last year, Decade 80-XIV purchased the Clearwater Bay Marina. Having
operated the marina for several months now, we feel it would be beneficial for us to have
a dealer's license to transact the sale of some of our customer's boats. These are boats that
are stored in the existing wet slips or dry storage facilities at the marina. Additionally, we
are occasionally asked by banks to assist with selling a boat, which they have acquired
through foreclosure.
As I mentioned to you, we are not desirous of inventorying any quantity of new
boats, or are we establishing a used boat dealership. Our intentions are solely to transact a
few boat sales when possible. I would anticipate that we might have fewer than three
boats for sale at anyone time. Any of these would be boats stored within our existing
facilities.
We believe providing this service is consistent with our other services here at the
marina and would very much appreciate your consideration of our request. I will be
happy to supply any additional information you may require or answer any questions you
may have. I can be reached at the marina number above.
Cordially;
~-/.. /'
/~' ~-/<:L; &'
0-"- ///:3/:;7 (:::;:/ /~/\>'7-,:>
/ Don L. Harrill
Decade Properties, Inc.
\.---
,WinWord Document: PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
Page 1 of8
--
--
WinWord Document: PLANNING AND
ZONING BOARD
Previous
Document
Next
Document
IFirst I Native
Hit WinWord
View
Image
Back to
Results
~~
~E:J
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY OF CLEARWATER
--~
\
./
J}lly 7, 1998
- ".~--'-' ,-->.--
PresenL Douglas Hilkert Chair
Gerald Figurski Vice-Chair
Edward Mazur Board Member
Frank Kunnen Board Member
Rick Anderson Board Member
David Gildersleeve Board Member
Steven Chandler Board Member
Pamela Akin City Attorney (arrived 3 :23 p.m.)
Leslie Dougall-Sides Assistant CityAttorney (departed 3:00 p.m.)
Sandra Glatthorn Planning Manager
~OD.l{). 4-~
Teresa Mancini Associate Planner
Etim Udoh Associate Planner
Brenda Moses Board Reporter
The Chair called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall, followed by the Invocation, Pledge of
Allegiance, and a review of meeting procedures and the appeal process.
To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that
order.
http://199 .227.233. 29/ISYSquery/IRLF93 C.tmp/3/ doc
03/09/2000
--0 -
--
-
ITEM A - Minutes of Previous Meetings - May 19 and June 2, 1998
Approval of minutes was postponed to the August 4, 1998, meeting.
ITEM B - Requests for Extension, Deferred, and Continued Items - None.
ITEM C - Conditional Uses
1. Gilbert G. Jannelli/Erik Parks (Cigar Central, Inc.) to permit nightclubs, taverns, and bars (new
license) at 40 N. Ft. Harrison, Earl & Tate's Sub., Lot 16 & part of Lot 17, zoned UC[C] (Urban
Center Core). CU 98-24
The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to allow a nightclub with alcoholic beverage sales
at 40 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. The subject property has a Future Land Use Designation of Central
Business District. The building is vacant. The applicant intends to apply for a 2- COP alcoholic
beverage license and operate a cigar retail store in conjunction with the proposed nightclub use. On
June 9, 1998, the DRB (Design Review Board) approved the installation of a lighted canopy sign
along Ft. Harrison Avenue. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
In response to a question, Associate Planner Teresa Mancini said the applicant is not required to
provide parking, however, if he wishes to use the unimproved vacant lot west of the building for
patron parking, it must be brought up to code.
In response to a question, applicant Erik Parks said this property has one large building and 3 mailing
addresses. The 40 Ft. Harrison Avenue address will be used for mailing purposes. Alcoholic beverages
will be served in room 44. The operation will open at 10:00 a.m. On Sundays, alcoholic beverages will
be served after 1 :00 p.m.
Discussion ensued regarding the proximity of property on Cleveland Street. Planning Manager Sandy
Glatthorn said the proposed use is not within 500 feet of residential, church, or school uses.
Two persons spoke in favor, citing this business WIn create more interest and vitality in downtown. No
one spoke in opposition.
Member Kunnen moved to approve Item C-l, subject to conditions: 1) the applicant shall obtain the
requisite occupational license within six months from the date of this public hearing; 2) the sale of
alcoholic beverages shall be limited to consumption on premises with no package sales; 3) there shall
be no outdoor entertainment or speakers; 4) the applicant shall obtain the requisite State of Florida
Alcoholic Beverage License within six months from the date of this public hearing; and 5) any pictures
and/or advertising to be located on the north side of the building shall be reviewed and approved by
the City's Architectural Planner prior to installation. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
2. P.S.A., Inc./B.lE., Inc./Majestik Corp. to permit nightclubs, taverns, and bars (change of business
ownership) at 470 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater Beach Park 1st Addition, Blk B, Lots 32-43 and
vacated alley adj; Clearwater Beach Park 1st Addition Replat ofBlk A & B, Blk A, Lots 2- 8; and
Clearwater Beach Park, Lots 43-48, 65-71 and part of Lot 64, zoned CR28 (Resort Commercial) &
CB (Beach Commercial). CU 98-25
http://199.227.233 . 29/ISYSquery1IRLF93 C.tmp/3/doc
03/09/2000
.& \.+0"" ...... '-'.... .......
It
e
The owner is requesting conditional use approval to allow a night- club/restaurant with alcoholic
beverage sales in the Resort Commercial" Twenty-Eight" and Beach Commercial Zoning Districts at
470 Mandalay Avenue. The Planning and Zoning Board previously approved a nightclub at this
location on December 16, 1997. The applicant intends to continue to operate a nightclub to be known
as "Majestik," and transfer the existing 4- COP alcoholic beverage license. The proposed use is
consistent with the commercial nature of Manda lay Avenue and the existing land use designation.
Staff recommends approval.
In response to a question, Ms. Glatthorn said this request involves a unity of title and site plan
approval. The request for a nightclub involves the west portion of this property, previously identified
as " Jammin'z." Future requests for other uses on other portions of the property will require
conditional use approval by this board. In response to a question, she said Condition #4 addresses past
violations of public nudity and adult use regulation ordinances but does not prohibit live bands or
dancers. In response to a question, Assistant City Attorney Leslie Dougall-Sides said a procedure
addresses failures to comply with conditional use approvals. Revocation of a business license requires
a hearing. It was noted previous incidents related to public nudity and adult use regulations at this
property occurred before regulations were placed on it. Discussion ensued regarding whether outdoor
speakers and a trial period is necessary.
James Eftekhari, representative, submitted his concerns regarding staffs recommendation to prohibit
bikini and wet T-shirt contests. He said other area businesses are permitted this type of activity and he
is being judged unfairly by the actions of the former property owner. He plans to operate the business
in a professional manner and requested the board reconsider Condition #4. He also requested the
board extend the hours of operation to 3 :00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights. In response to a
question, he said he will stop selling alcoholic beverages at 1 :00 a.m., but permit patrons to enjoy the
music and dancing until 3 :00 a.m.
One person spoke in support, and referred to Condition #4. She said in the past, the previous owner
had experienced problems during Spring Break of 1996 that involved wet T-shirt contests. She said no
such incidents were related to bikini contests.
Member Figurski moved to approve Item C-2, subject to conditions: 1) the applicant shall obtain the
requisite occupational license within six months from the date of this public hearing; 2) the sale of
alcoholic beverages shall be limited to consumption on premises with no package sales; 3) there shall
be no outdoor entertainment; 4) the applicant shall neither promote nor permit on the premises any
live entertainment, competitions, contests, or any activities which result in the violation of the public
nudity or adult use regulation ordinances (Section 21.13, Code of Ordinances, and Section 41.601,
Code of Ordinances, respectively). In particular, the applicant shall neither promote nor permit bikini
contests, "wet T-shirt contests," or similar activities on the premises; and 5) the applicant shall
provide landscaping in accordance with Section 42.27 and the approved landscape plan including the
replacement of any existing vegetation that is dead or dying prior to obtaining an occupational license,
striking the language "bikini contests" in Condition #4, adding Condition #6 as follows: "This approval
will be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board in 9 months. The proposed hours of operation
permitted will be 10: 00 a. m. until 3: 00 a. m." The motion was duly seconded. Members, Figurski,
Mazur, Kunnen, Anderson, and Chandler and Chair Hilkert voted "Aye"; Member Gildersleeve voted
"Nay." Motion carried.
3. Clearwater Bay Marine Ways, Inc.4a /Suncruz .. Casino, Ltd. (... Suncruz .. XI)
http://199.227.233.29/ISYSqueryIIRLF93C.tmp/3/doc
03/09/2000
TlUITlVIU L..'V'-'UJI.I~JIL. 1 LJrl....l'll"lll"l'-J rl...l"'l.L...1 L...rVl"4 11"4 V nvt"'\.KLJ
Pa.ge 40fS
e e
to permit nightclubs, taverns, and bars (passenger vessel) (change of business ownership) at 900 N.
Osceola Ave." JA. Gorra's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 2 &3, Part of Lot 1, filled submerged lands on west,
submerged land and riparian rights; Sue Barco Sub, Lots 13, 14, 23, and part of Lot 22, filled
submerged land and riparian rights; and F. T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3, 8-10, zoned CR24 (Resort
Commercial), CN (Neighborhood Commercial), & P (Preservation). CD 98-27
The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to permit alcoholic beverage sales on a passenger
vessel in the CR24 (Resort Commercial "Twenty-Four"), CN (Neighborhood Commercial), and P
(Preservation) Zoning District. On November 15, 1994, the Planning and Zoning Board approved a
600 passenger cruise ship with on-premise consumption of alcoholic beverage sales at this location.
The applicant continues to operate as a casino cruise ship with alcoholic beverage sales under the new
name "Sun Cruz Casino, Ltd." and transferred the existing 4- COP SPX alcoholic beverage license.
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to conditions.
In response to a question, Ms. Mancini said Condition #6 was placed on the previous applicant to
keep parking spaces open for overflow usage from City lots.
Ed Armstrong, representative, said the alcoholic beverage license is consistent with past usage. He
stated Harbormaster William Held has indicated support of this request.Bisuclient is requestingthe
board reconsider extending.herthingtimejnConditiOI1# 11 to ):09. a,m. on}'ridayand Saturday rughts,
and 12:30 a.m. on all other nights. "
In response to a question regarding suggested language to Condition # 2, Mr. Armstrong said the
wording is acceptable.
One person spoke in support, citing this request is a "win-win" situation and excellent economic
development opportunity for the City.
Member Mazur moved..t~M(QY.t::IItem C-3 with conditions: 1) the applicant shall obtain the requisite
occupational license within six months from the date of this public hearing; 2) the sale of alcoholic
beverages shall be limited to consumption on premises of the ship and the sale and distribution of
aJ~oholic bev~rages shall not occur until after the ship totally exits the marina; and that allalgoholic
beverage sal~s will cease on the ship's return at or prior to arrival at the Clearwater Pass Bridge; 3) all
in-bound cruises shall discontinue all entertainment activities at, or prior to, arrival at the Clearwater
Pass bridge; 4) there shall be no outdoor entertainment at the land side facilities and all use of outdoor
speakers on the ship while it is berthed shall be prohibited after 8:00 p.m.; 5) there shall be no outdoor
ship or site cleaning operations between the hours of8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.; 6) there shall be no
storage of boats in the paved parking spaces or travel aisles; 7) the cruise ship shall be docked in such
a manner that its exhaust is emitted in a westerly direction; and engine operatio~s....vYhTIelil~~nna
shall be kept to the minimum required by navigational necessity; 8) the applicant shall not utilize the
Ciij=c,wne'd'Semin:o'le-Bcmt'I:;alIrfch'paoong lot for bus and/or private vehicle parking in association
with this use; 9) the applicant shall continue to clarify the "service charge" issue in its advertising,
promotions, sales arrangements, employee training and ticket schedules so the fee is not identified in
any way with any charge imposed or revenue received by the City; there shall be no reference to a
"port charge"; 10) the applicant shall cease all operations within one hour after the day's final ship
berthing; and 11) the cruise ship shall be berthed by 1: 00 a.m. on Friday and Saturday nights and by
12:30 a.m. on all other nights, The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
4. Anna Tsafatinos/Liquid Blues, Inc. to permit nightclubs, taverns, and bars (change of business
http://199.227.233.29/ISYSqueryIIRLF93C.tmp/3/doc
03/09/2000
..,.., Hi..,... VIU .LJV\.JUIII\...lIl. 1 L.r"\...l";1";.11";\,J hl"'llJ LV1~1l~\J-DVf\.I\..U
e e
ownership) at 22 N. Ft. Harrison, Earl & Tate's Sub., part of Lots 12 & 13, zoned UC[C] (Urban
Center Core). CU 98-28
Page 501"8
The applicant is requesting conditional use approval to operate this establishment as a nightclub and
restaurant with alcoholic beverage sales at 22 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. The new owner intends to
transfer the 4-COP alcoholic beverage license and change the business' name from "The Ritz" to
"Liquid Blue." On June 17, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Board approved a nightclub with alcoholic
beverage sales at this location. The subject property is surrounded by mixed commercial uses and the
proposed use is consistent with the commercial nature of the downtown district. Staff recommends
approval subject to conditions.
Thomas Roman, representative, requested the board reconsider revising Condition #2 to allow
package sales. The business will be an upscale jazz club with a band and recorded dance floor music.
There will be no signs or purchasing counter advertising package sales. Occasionally, a bottle of wine
or champagne may be purchased by patrons for consumption outside the establishment.
Two persons spoke in support, citing the business will bring more activity to the downtown area. No
one spoke in opposition.
Member Figurski moved to approve Item C4, subject to conditions: I) the applicant shall obtain the
requisite occupational license within six months from the date of this public hearing; 2) the sale of
alcoholic beverages shall be limited to consumption on premises with no package sales on premises; 3)
there shall be no outdoor entertainment or speakers, and 4) the applicant shall neither promote nor
permit on the premises any live entertainment, competitions, contests, or any activities which result in
the violation of the public nudity or adult use regulation ordinances ( Section 21.13, Code of
Ordinances, and Section 41.601, Code of Ordinances, respectively). In particular, the applicant shall
neither promote nor permit "wet T-shirt contests", or similar activities on the premises, changing
Condition # 2 as follows: "... on premises. The motion was duly seconded.
Discus;sion ensued and Member Figurski amended the motion so that Condition #2 shall read: "The
sale of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted for consumption on premises and package sales shall be
permitted "; and "bikini contests" shall not be deleted from Condition #4. The seconder agreed.
Upon the vote being taken, the motion carried unanimously.
ITEM D - Annexation, Zoning, Land Use Plan Amendment, land Development Code Text
Amendment, and Local Planning Agency Review
1. 23055 US 19N, Sec. 05-29-16, M&B 33.08 (John C. & Elizabeth 1. Prida) A 98-20 LUP:
Residential/OfficelRetail ZONE: CH (Highway Commercial)
The applicant is requesting annexation of non-residential property at 23055 US 19N to obtain sewer
service. The applicant proposes to connect a force main to an existing sanitary sewer line by
Coachman Plaza, approximately 250 feet north ofthe subject property. The applicant will be
responsible for the cost of this work. This request will not create an enclave. Staff recommends
approval.
Member Kunnen moved to approve Item D-I as requested. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
http://199.227.233.29/ISYSquery/IRLF93C.tmp/3/doc
03/09/2000
....... ~.u ......VvUlllvllL. 1 Ll""\1'1nlJ'IV t-V~U LUj~ll~U nUAKlJ
--
e
. Page 6 of8
2. 1614 Long Street, Highland Pines 1st Addition, Blk 7, Lot 7 and Part of Lot 6 (Gabriel C. &
Kristine D. Slater) A 98-21 LUP: Residential Urban ZONE: RS8 (Single Family Residential)
The applicant is requesting annexation of a single family residential property at 1614 Long Street to
obtain sewer service. A sewer line is available at Long Street and requires an extension for service.
The applicant will be responsible for related costs. Staff recommends approval.
No one spoke in support or opposition.
Member Gildersleeve moved to approve Item D-2 as submitted. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously.
3. Amending the Land Development Code, Code of Ordinances, regarding power of eminent domain.
Ordinance 6302-98
Ms. Glatthorn presented background information and reviewed standards of approval. FDOT (Florida
Department of Transportation) is requesting a revision to the City's Land Development Code to allow
the agency to sign, in lieu of the property owner, applications for variances to land development
regulatiems. This change will allow FDOT to proceed quickly with necessary takings of land for
roadway improvements. Stafffeels the amendment complies with the City's comprehensive plan and
advances the purpose of the development code. The amendment will contribute to and promote the
community's welfare and will not constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner
or tenant. Based on the findings of fact, staff has determined this amendment meets the standards of
review as set forth in Section 39.22 of the Land Development Code.
Discussion ensued regarding FDOT's ability to take property from a property owner with
compensation, regardless of the owner's objections. In response to a remark, the City Attorney said
FDOT would have to already be in the process of taking, with authorization before the agency can
request a variance. This amendment will allow FDOT to apply for a variance without the owner's
consent. The purpose of the amendment is to reduce damages payable to the owner. In response to a
question, she said FDOT will never obtain title to an entire parcel, however if the agency obtains title
to the part being taken, the variance would then take effect.
Richard Vickers, FDOT General Counsel, said this amendment clarifies the entire process. FDOT feels
this is a reasonable cure to a problem. He said the intent of the amendment is not to permit FDOT to
do whatever it pleases on an individual's property. In response to a question, he said other cities have
adopted this ordinance.
Concern was expressed this amendment appears to give an unfair advantage to government regarding
individual property owners' rights. It was remarked the property owner's signature, not the FDOT's,
should be on land development regulation variance applications, conditional uses, and site plan
reviews associated with takings of land for road improvements.
Member Figurski moved to deny endorsement of the proposal as presented. The motion was duly
seconded.
Mr. Vickers said the amendment would allow FDOT an advisory opinion from the City regarding an
eminent domain takings ordinance and permittable cures. Without the amendment, the parties or a jury
http://199.227.233.29/ISYSqueryIIRLF93C.tmp/3/doc
03/09/2000
n... '-~-wu"';0vuJllvJlC~ -lL-""I'll'U "-1~U L.Vj~ll~V DVAKU
e
will determine what is fair under the law.
e
Page 7of8
In response to a question, the City Attorney said should the board postpone a decision, it can request
the City Commission to continue the item at the next City Commission meeting.
Upon the vote being taken, Members, Figurski, Mazur, Kunnen, Anderson, and Chandler and Chair
Hilkert voted "Aye"; Member Gildersleeve voted "Nay". Motion carried.
The meeting recessed from 4:41 to 4:50 p.m.
4. Amending Code of Ordinances relating to transit shelters. Ordinance 6303-98
The City Attorney reported this ordinance request relates to a proposed settlement agreement between
the City and Eller Media for removal of billboards, not including those on US 19N. The ordinance
provides the following: 1) permits bus shelters with advertising; 2) allows back-lit signs on the
"downstream" end wall of the shelter, and limits the area of the sign to 24 square feet; 3) total number
of shelters with advertising is limited to 50; 4) shelters will be spaced 1,000 feet apart from other
shelters located on the same side of the street; a variance provision will allow 3 shelters within 2,000
feet under certain conditions as outlined in the ordinance; and 5) allows shelters in commercial, office,
or industrial zoning districts, or on PST A routes adjacent to hospitals, schools, or other permitted
nonresidential uses in multifamily residential zoning districts. In response to a question, she said the
City has been in litigation with Eller Media for a number of years, and this settlement agreement will
resolve all pending lawsuits. Should this proposal not settle the case and result in dismissal, the
ordinance will not take effect. The outcome of pending litigation is uncertain.
In response to a question, the City Attorney said the 1,000 foot restriction relates to transit shelters
with advertising on a bus route. It was remarked more than one shelter on cross roads could be closer
than 1,000 feet if on different bus routes. Concern was expressed these shelters will replace the
billboards that Eller Media is required to remove. In response to a question, the City Attorney said
Eller Media has an agreement with PST A regarding the total number of shelters allowed county-wide.
This proposal does not mandate shelters; it only permits shelters with advertising. In response to a
question, she said points of agreement outstanding with Eller Media are: 1) the total number of
shelters permittable with advertising and 2) design criteria for the shelters.
Todd Pressman, representative, said Eller is seeking to attach advertising signage at approved transit
shelters, and proposes to remove 21 existing billboards. He said this suggested ordinance is an
alternative to pursuing long term legal matters. He stated the City Commission has suggested
permitting a maximum of 50 shelters with advertising. Eller originally had proposed 150 shelters but is
willing to accept 90 shelters with advertising. He said the shelters will not be built overnight. They
must comply with City zoning, PST A, and rights-of- way requirements.
In response to a question, Public Affairs Director Shawn Ulrich said Eller plans to maintain all shelters
at least twice a week, promptly clean vandalized shelters, and replace panels with shatterproof plastic
when necessary.
Three persons spoke in opposition, noting: 1) the proposed ordinance is an affront to law-abiding
businesses in Clearwater which have complied with the sign ordinance; 2) proposes a lack of code
enforcement; 3) residents were not notified of shelters proposed for their neighborhoods; 4) the
ordinance only prohibits signs where they interfere with traffic control devices; 5) development of this
http://199.227.233.29/ISYSqueryIIRLF93C.tmp/3/doc
03/09/2000
I-age (') or (')
e -
agreement was not open to toe public; 6) shelters with advertising should not be near schools; 7)
shelters with advertising lack restrictions regarding electrical connections and poles which induce
visual clutter; 8) these shelters will change the character of the surrounding area; 9) freestanding
electrical poles are unsightly; and 10) the proposal is contrary to the One City. One Future. concept. It
was requested the City define the specific area referred to as "within the City limits." It was suggested
language be included in the proposal requiring the City Traffic Engineer's input regarding blockage of
intersections and other pertinent matters.
Member Gildersleeve moved to continue Item D-4 to the August 4, 1998, meeting. The motion was
duly seconded.
Mr. Pressman said the board was not requested to make a legal judgment, but to review the proposed
ordinance. Federal funding is no longer available to fund transit shelters. He said a number of people
previously spoke in support of this proposal.
Upon the vote being taken, Members Figurski, Mazur, Gildersleeve, and Chandler voted "Aye";
Members Kunnen, and Anderson and Chair Hilkert voted" Nay." Motion carried.
ITEM E - Chairman's Items
The next meeting is scheduled for August 4, 1998.
The Chair welcomed new member Steven Chandler.
The Chair expressed his enjoyment working with Scott Shuford and wished him well in his new
position.
ITEM F - Director's Items - None.
ITEM 'G - Board and Staff Comments
It was suggested changing language used in "Staff Recommendations II Ms. Glatthorn will share the
board's comments with the Central Permitting Director.
ITEM H - Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 6:09 p.m.
mpz0798 907/07/98
Ask me about ISYS
http://199.227.233 . 29/ISYSquery1IRLF93 C. tmp/3/doc
03/09/2000
..
e ~ LL- -6 \'V\'\ ~ r'b~fo
, It[ 6D
April 12, 2000
Mr. Greg Karan
Executive Vice President
Sun Cruz Casino
198 Seminole Street
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Dear Mr. Karan:
It has come to my attention through neighborhood complaints that the noise generated
from the operation of your Sun Cruz Casino business is excessive and unacceptable. As
you are well aware, the City's (former) Planning and Zoning Board approved a
Conditional Use request to operate a passenger vessel at the Clearwater Bay Marina with
the specific limitation on the use of "engine operations" while at the marina. In
particular, the Board required that engine operations be kept to the minimum required by
navigational necessity. The use of shore power, in lieu of the generators (considered
engines) would greatly reduce unnecessary noise in the immediate vicinity of your
vessels.
Additionally, the City's Community Response Team has noted a violation in the hours of
the vessel's operation. As approved by the Planning and Zoning Board, the ship must be
berthed by 12:30 am from Sunday through Thursday and by 1:00 am on Friday and
Saturday. It has been observed that the boat was late on Monday, March 20, 2000 (12:50
am) and Saturday, March 25, 2000 (1: 15 am). While these may have been isolated
events, it is critical that you understand the restrictions that were placed upon your
operation.
I am hopeful that you will be a "good neighbor" and fully comply with the conditions of
your Conditional Use approval. I trust you can appreciate the noise concerns of the
adjacent residents and that you respect their right to enjoy quiet, peaceful evenings.
fL Q7J. \0 ~
~.,
-
e
Karan
Page 2 - April 12, 2000
The City's Planning and Development Services Staff is available to further discuss the
issues addressed herein. Please feel free to contact Lisa Fierce, Development Review
Manager at 562.4561 if you need assistance.
Thank you for you immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Michael 1. Roberto
City Manager
Cc: Vicki Morgan
Lisa Fierce
Community Response Team Staff
Address file
S:\LETTERS\letter - karan, sun cruz casino. doc
I..,,~ ..' j . r-.-
. ...~.. '-../ -'--.'
1.. ._
.:c,- I
-
e
CITY OF CLEARWATER
COMMU~lITY RESPONSE TEAM
Municipal Services Building, 100 S Myrtle Avenue
Telephone(727) 562-4720 Fax(727)562-4735
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
COD2000-01539
Own.r
SUNCRUZ CASINO, L TO.
647 EAST DANIA BEACH BLVD
DAN lA, FL 33044
ADDRESS OR LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 900 S OSCEOLA AVE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: GORRA'S, J. A. SUB BLK 2, WL Y 120 FT(S) OF LOT 1 & N 1/2 OF
LOT 2 & FILLED SUBM LAND ON W
PA'RCEL #0929-15-32184-002-0010
DATE OF INSPECTION: 3/24/00 1:15AM
SECTION(S) OF CITY CODE WHICH HAVE BEEN VIOLATED: 1-106.C. and 1-104.B.
FACTS BEHIND VIOLATION:
*EXISTING APPROVED USES* An existing use which is lawful on the date of adoption of this Dev. Code, whether a
"permitted use" or a "conditionalwre" in the zoning district in which it is located, shall not be deemed nonconforming
solely because the prt)Cedure for approval has changed through the adoption of the Dav. Code. (lithe event the US2
was approved subject to one or more conditions, those conditions shall continue in full force and effect unless a new
approval is obtained.
No building, structure, water or land shall be used or occupied, and no building, structure, or land shall be developed
unless in conformity with all of the provisions of the zoning district in which it is located, all applicable regulations,
and all development approvals.
Specifically, Sun Cruz is violating their conditional use requirements by running motors for other than
navigational necessity and for returning to dock on 3/20/00 & 3/25/00 after required times.
THE VIOLATION(S) CITED ABOVE MUST BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO 4/13/2000, FAILURE TO
CORRECT THE ABOVE LISTED VIOLATION(S) BY THE DATE INDICATED, OR RECURRENCE OF THE
VIOLATION AFTER CORRECTION, WILL RESULT IN A LEGAL ACTION BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT
BOARD OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER OR BY THE PINELLAS COUNTY COURT. SUCH ACTION
MAY RESULT IN A FINE. THE ALLEGED VIOLATOR MAY BE LIABLE FOR THE REASONABLE COSTS
OF THE INVESTIGATION, PROSECUTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SHOULD THIS
PERSON BE FOUND GUILTY OF THE VIOLATION.
DA TE MAILED:4/6/00
INSPECTOR: Janice King
INSPECTOR TELEPHONE: 562-4732
~~~
,,"11;,
,." ~~LOF Tilf. "...
..~~ ~ ,,''''',''~~--
.....!':.,.... ~~~
.:.~~~,,~ \L~,/Yr\r' 1~~ ~ ~
;~r----\--~~:
..--.... . ..... ~('\.:"....
-Y.L\', . "{'...'\'
__?'$."'m."~~'\
.........,,~TER,..,.'
#1.111'
It
CITY OF
.
CLEAR\XlATER
PlANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLE\RWATER, FLORiDA 33758-4748
Ml'~K!PAl SERVICES BCIIDIC:G, 100 SOCIH MYRTLE AVE'TE, CLL\.R\'iMER, FLORIDA 3:3"56
TELEPHO:\E (727) 562-.1567 F-\.x (727) 562-4576
COM?vlL':";ITY RESPOc;SE TEAIvl
(727) 562-4720
lYhy 3, 2000
Greg Karan, Executive Vice President
Sun Cmz Casino
198 Seminole Street
Clearwater, FL 33755
Dear Mr. Karan:
This correspondence is in regard to our meeting on April 25, 2000 with you and I and Lisa Fierce of the
Planning and Development Services Department. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for
your willingness to cooperate with us. We will make every reasonable attempt to cooperate with you in
return, while still maintaining adherence to the conditions placed on your business and respecting the needs
of the surrounding residential neighborhood.
In summing up the basic content of our meeting, it was agreed that the ship would adhere to the return
times stipulated in the most recent conditional uses, i.e., 12:30 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and by 1:00
a.m. on Friday and Saturday. As stated, a five-minute deviation from these times is reasonable and can be
understood, but more than that will be considered a violation of the conditions. Your captains will have to
make the necessary adjustments for tides and other circumstances. It was also agreed that the generators
will not be started up more than one hour prior to departure time. This is to comply with the condition that
the engines will be used for navigational necessity only.
While the current return times were approved by the Planning and Zoning Board, which by the way has
been replaced by a comprehensive Community Development Board, I want to restate here that the
neighbors are not happy with the change from the previous earlier return times. They have indicated they
would like to meet with the Marina owners when your contract is up for renewal and discuss a return to
earlier berthing times.
Again I want to take this opportunity to thank you for your willingness to cooperate with us on these issues.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4732.
Sincerely,
~
Janice King
Code Inspector II
Community Response
City of Clearwater
O:\E CITY, O':E FUCRE,
cc: Mike Roberto, Clearwater City Manag~LL; .l AL:\csr, .\L\YOP-CO\!',IISSIO\ER
ED HOOPER, VICE ?\L\YOR-Cml\IlSSIO\ER
ED HART, CmL\IlSSIO\ER
a~J, ID'~Cp
*
BOB CL\RK, Cml\IISSIO:\ER
.lB, JOH\SO\, Cml\IISSIO:\ER
"EQL.-\.L E\lPLonlE:\T ASO AFFfR\lAm'E ACTIO:, E\iPLOYEP"
-
.
Lisa Fierce, Development Review Manager
Jeff Kronschnabl, Development Services Director
Lt. Donald Hall, Police Dept.
Vickie Morgan, neighbor
Mary Alexander, neighbor
Jim W'racker, owner, Clearwater Bay Marina
e~~ ~ Wt'I~ Yb~fo _flt[ifO
April 12, 2000
Mr. Greg Karan
Executive Vice President
Sun Cruz Casino
198 Seminole Street
Clearwater, Florida 33755
Dear Mr. Karan:
It has come to my attention through neighborhood complaints that the noise generated
from the operation of your Sun Cruz Casino business is excessive and unacceptable. As
you are well aware, the City's (former) Planning and Zoning Board approved a
Conditional Use request to operate a passenger vessel at the Clearwater Bay Marina with
the specific limitation on the use of "engine operations" while at the marina. In
particular, the Board required that engine operations be kept to the minimum required by
navigational necessity. The use of shore power, in lieu of the generators (considered
engines) would greatly reduce unnecessary noise in the immediate vicinity of your
vessels.
Additionally, the City's Community Response Team has noted a violation in the hours of
the vessel's operation. As approved by the Planning and Zoning Board, the ship must be
berthed by..!LJ.lJ yam from Sunday through Thursday and by 1.00 am on Friday and
Saturday. It has been observecrthat the boat was late on Monday, March 20,2000 (12:50
am) and Saturday, March 25, 2000 (1: 15 am). While these may have been isolated
events, it is critical that you understand the restrictions that were placed upon your
operation.
I am hopeful that you will be a "good neighbor" and fully comply with the conditions of
your Conditional Use approval. I trust you can appreciate the noise concerns of the
adjacent residents and that you respect their right to enjoy quiet, peaceful evenings.
Karan e
Page 2 - April 12, 2000
e
The City's Planning and Development Services Staff is available to further discuss the
issues addressed herein. Please feel free to contact Lisa Fierce, Development Review
Manager at 562.4561 if you need assistance.
Thank you for you immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Michael 1. Roberto
City Manager
Cc: Vicki Morgan
Lisa Fierce
Community Response Team Staff
Address file
S:\LETTERSIletter - karan, sun cruz casino. doc
e
e
~ns,Ryan
(om:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
King, Janice
Wednesday, December 06,20008:19 AM
Givens, Ryan
FW: 880 900 and 908 N Osceola
sorry, was out yesterday. My problem with 900 N. Osceola is only with the Sun Cruz at this time--noise violations. The
owners of the marina lease the property to the Sun Cruz but I have chosen to take enforcement actions against the Sun
Cruz business since the marina owners have problems with them also and have been very compliant in working with me.
They have no other violations at this time at the marina.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hall, Bob
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:24 PM
To: Givens, Ryan
Cc: Fierce, Lisa; King, Janice; Kronschnabl, Jeff
Subject: RE: 880 900 and 908 N Osceola
880 Osceola does not have any Code cases listed in permit plan on it.
908 Osceola has 2 older cases which are both closed. One was for overgrowth and the other was for
multiple violations.
900 Osceola has a number of violations attached to it. Many of the cases are closed. However; two
cases are still active with notes from Janice King. One is regarding parking and the other is violation
to the conditions placed on the property. This is regarding the Sun Cruz issues that have been going
on. If you need details of the situations, please check with Janice as this has been a long term
situation for her. The case numbers are COD1999-01598 and COD2000-01539 if you wish to see the
notes to date.
-----Original Message-----
From: Givens, Ryan
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:38 AM
To: Hall, Bob
Cc: Fierce, Lisa
Subject: 880 900 and 908 N Osceola
Bob,
I need to finish a staff report for today regarding the sites at 880 900 and 908 n Osceola. Would you provide me with a
brief code enforcement statement for these sites? General explain any violations and if they were corrected. Thank
you so much.
Ryan
Wm. Ryan Givens, Planner
City of Clearwater - Planning & Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33756
727-562-4504
<< File: Givens, Ryan.vet >>
1
e
e
IS, Ryan
m:
.:nt:
Hall, Bob
Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:24 PM
Givens, Ryan
Fierce, Lisa; King, Janice; Kronschnabl, Jeff
RE: 880 900 and 908 N Osceola
,0:
Cc:
Subject:
880 Osceola does not have any Code cases listed in permit plan on it.
908 Osceola has 2 older cases which are both closed. One was for overgrowth and the other was for
multiple violations.
900 Osceola has a number of violations attached to it. Many of the cases are closed. However; two
cases are still active with notes from Janice King. One is regarding parking and the other is violation
to the conditions placed on the property. This is regarding the Sun Cruz issues that have been going
on. If you need details of the situations, please check with Janice as this has been a long term
situation for her. The case numbers are COD1999-01598 and COD2000-01539 if you wish to see the
notes to date.
-----Original Message-----
From: Givens, Ryan
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 10:38 AM
To: Hall, Bob
Cc: Fierce, Lisa
Subject: 880 900 and 908 N Osceola
Bob,
I need to finish a staff report for today regarding the sites at 880 900 and 908 n Osceola. Would you provide me with a
brief code enforcement statement for these sites? General explain any violations and if they were corrected. Thank
you so much.
Ryan
Wm. Ryan Givens, Planner
City of Clearwater - Planning & Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33756
727-562-4504
------ C:I,," ~:"___ D,.I__ ..,._~........
C_.\ \ ,'C \ (\~\\ \\. c' ."
r'- -
>('\\ '\ --~-~~-'\'fC L -
,) \
\ )(' (i ,'\',
....".~\ ,C"
\.'C i (:\.t~Q(\: C'r-/(~. C\. (t.e,> {.). (~t
(~-f. ~l.}t~)~~~=.. ~,..l ((:. \)6 r'\ () (c\(~i)' i(-ta
Of C_\ . \S_~, (\ _(~-\(\.!'[<" ..
(}.L \~ x. \. \~\.(~\'/o t.;J-' (i)CJ c: LI, J
\
-\\\7\ (.:'.'~/:'r') 11 .1'.'.'11 )}f:4]:
'''.~'')- 'I, C " i,t' "
'I'-~ . ..... ....."..
!! -"}, '
",,' /.- ....~
, '1:.1 ',.
~ ~ f: '
e
~ eIearwater
FAX
()
Planning and Development Services Administration
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576
TO: Randy FAX: 562-4461
Ryan Givens~' . TELEPHONE: N/A
FROM: TELEPHONE: 727-562-4504
SUBJECT: Clearwater Mari a Project
DATE: December 4, 2000 NUMBER OF PAGES 3
INCLUDING COVER:
Randy
You attended the ORC for the Clearwater Marina Project. I received a revised site plan
and I wanted you to look at the revisions for emergency access for the restaurant portion of
the project. The condo tower to the north now has a 30-foot access aisle. Please look at
the attached portions of the site plan and let me know if further revisions are needed.
W. Ryan Givens
562-4504
rgivens @ clearwater-fl.com
~z
''<>~
;g;;j
;Ow
~(J)
-:I:
00
z~
""z
~~
z""
""
g~
Yl""
z
=l
c
s::
~u
)>~I\J
e5 )> v~
. ../ ;0 0
aJZO
)>)>
- (f)
-f O.
.,,~
(f)."
:1:-;0
OOfTl
-ofTl-t
)>
.r
~
~~
O(f)
:Eo
z-o
fTlfTl
;0;0
-)>
(f)-f
00
-oZ
-f-f
00
Z
;0
fTl
~
I ~
-i
32
lJ
-l
::0
""U
G")
rrl
Z
rrl
::0
~
o
z
~
CD
C
~
o
z
Z~~N~01
,,-00J' ~,
)>(,,~~O~
'-J0J ~
~)> )> G)
~)>~~~ ~
fTI~fTIfT1fT1 fTI
fTIlJ lJ ;U
lJ ITIlJlTI ~
S8;:g;uS8;u (5
;UUl C Z
c;-t.CO~
OOlJO-i
00 0
o
Ul Ul
:"YJ :'1
':'1
;a
o
3::
;U
~
fTI
;a
'ij
Q
""
z
""
AJ
~
<5
.Z
0>
-i
:I:
""
o
3
o
~
-0
C
(Xl
r
in
:I:
""
o
(Xl
-<
-i
:I:
""
I
+
z11~~
~~I ~~
'-i
:Z:--i~ITIZ
ITIG) I
/~;~~~ j, ""
~ co ^ "'"
(J1 .... /J '.
o Co ~ "" '.; <>
(J1 '-J tl . "', ' "" . \ '.
,/ :~'~ Ji ~
tl ',(J ::c h.(?.:h.... ....,:'='; ~
"" "n..0" :E
~ " .'1; ,>, )>
. if'j ',< '. r
,.... :.'\ "~-:; r
.'. (' ,/ . ~
\ ,&'" ,"< ~\/
l/i'I~~~'i,~/
't~f1If"ii~'
~v'//'.Av~r ,
:4~ f h::>~~,::~:":'~/'<::::>
V, !. '<::::. :..gs ~lf
"I. <~ .:~~.,
I "".,C)S",
! / ", o-:::t fA. L; "
/ '" ~- - ,.
~ ' 'i:(; ~:
,'~I>j~
) ~~..>t '4
. o~ 0
~ - Ja' 0
if :::) f
C)~ Vj
~/
~/
~f(
~J.'
ca o~........................j; "
\~''''' J.'
J.
ZN'-J'-J~~
........... N'....
)> 010
lJZ
;uc
Os::
lJm
01Tl
Ul;U
ITI
o
ZCXlCXl....'-JN
...........~0JN~0J
)>....NOOO
C=l
UlITI
fTI
0);:
oz
00
ITI
~CXl<DN01CXl
O~;::;CO~
.....
Q)
~
ITI
-J::l..~-oO'-J
o. )> 0'0
-.,,~ZO
~II)>~O
- r;O(f)
r-J.~C.
ON O-f~
Z'
G)OOfTl;o
S~Opl
I ;:OO(J)
fTl Z~
G) :E c
I )>-0:::0
-f -1_)>
fTl.Z
;oZ-I
G)
/
-
m Z
g 0
-l
UJ ~
C
-0
UJ
~
;U
-<
Z
Ul
N
ITI
)>
UJ
UJ
I
0
:E
:z:
lD""U
0::0
ro
~\J
::00
O(J)
fT1
..........0
=<
\J
.
r0
~
...h.
ff
"-'
6"
&
~
~
~
~
N
t:J
,,':'~<~':'"
":'k/. ".j
.'~. '<::
0<.."
" .
'- .... .'
'.
. --, ....~" .....
'.
#
\
--::.,~.
"---< --
~
if S:1.P.:,tJ,]7,i
-0-0-0-0-0
IIIII
)>)>)>)>)>
(f)(f)(f)(f)(f)
rrJrrJrrJrrJrrJ
~~~~:7
AJAJOClJAJ
rrJrrJ'1OrrJ
(f)(f)'1)>};!
o};!o-l-
rrJcrrJ(f)r-
~AJClJr~
)>~c-o)>
r-lrAJAJ
)> orrJz
AJ ZZ)>
~ (;)00
~'1
-1'1
00
ZrrJ
)>
Z
o
~
-I
(f)
I
o
-0
(J):::O)>fTl
rfTl;OX
-o-orrt(J)
(J));:)>-I
(J-IZ
fTlOG)
o
mm
:ErrlO
- )>
-1;0-1
IfTl
0)3::3::
0)>
Z<;o
fTlfTlZ
:f 0 Pl
'-.. ....-
;iZ(bg~3~60W
'< c;.::J ,.-+._,,~ .,CD :l Z ~ rT,
...rT::; u..Cll Cll
OOrT~Nen'O~~
(f) ::J 0 :J N rT 0 :J -.
a. ,~ a.e
^ g:o-O(b rT ::J
:JO(bo::J~en:T~o
0- ea. OCll}:-~
"'~U::J -<:0: . :::
::J ,a.N_, (/) 0
_, 0 0 (.,j:J ,0 G) o'
O::JU, \OOCO-
::J 0 Cll <ii' 0 rT g: ::U-<:
a. C ;4. en ~ 0- - ::u
~e:'<o(f)~(.,jo~S
C ::J :T ~ 9. '" ""'::J VJ 0
;4.\0 (b a. (b 0 a. '"
::; , (f) Cll VJ ::J
(J) ~~. 9, (f) ::J g: '" C
'-~a.5-,(b~~~
a.'Cll a.o 0-
(J).o'~b<'U;-Z:TS;z
(f) :T 0 rT _, 0 (/) _,
~""'a; (f) !!?,~;4.ro-o-o
_.W o(.,j:Tw:T
g-0a.(J;:J- ~ z2.
a.~(b o-..w::Eo~
WO::J.J>.,....Cll:J:J
og~::J ~
!I! 0 c;: a.,.... 0 0 rT(/)
'Cll ::;::J~o::TrT
~a.N(ba.:J~Clla;
0' 0 _N ::E ~ ~ 0 z ~
::J :J 0 ~ (J1 0 W ~ _.
00.:J1""1- .....r+~:::J
::Joa.' ~(f)d ......
a.", 0 0.0'0::;
::J )>:J (/) -. ::T:J (1)
::J, (b [;) a. C a. ...... a.
-ga.ozfT1,=:,Q
, o:Jo......
5'0-00 CO...... (1) ,....'<
'< -;4.)> en
-::T::U-" 0
O(.,j -
o 0" 0J
-
S=S=<bC~~
(J) <1> <1>::J g(f)
......~-"z'-Jo
o <1>g:a,<Dg:
rTVJ(1)<Ocoo
=:J"". :J 0 ~
(bOo.j:>.(;'
_q(b'::!<1l-g
'1~-"VJN""";4.
...... N. 0J::E-'
1- 0j co ~ <1l 0
'" '-Jtq~(J) ::J
::T ~.j:>.- '"'"0
2 ~'::!C7l0 -
(1)- N(J1--
~(.,jco,....g
g.~~<D~a.
o o~ <0
0.0 _1'Tlg-
N (I) 0 _.
,.,........{bV1:::1
g-%?l:;'"'"\O
g!"tO......~a.
:h......ro~o~
Z~(I)::JOo
:l:J-"~3~
-..J () <1l (1)
o<'D=r(/)la...
);U)<b ~o
;o,~ q-g
OC7l(J).j:>.UJ
~oz'::!~ ar
-1'0. N,....\O
N g ~ 0' S'
. '::! 0 ~::J ::!,
~r1~~ _<O~
~ - (.,j 1'0
.N'::!~d~
,grr1.j:>.~ 0
. ~ 0J::J
o (f)
. N(;'~-g
. CD ~ ~ -0 5-
~o.... N.......
... ........ .- <D ........
..-.(O=r ........
::; (I) (I) VJ .
<1> -" i? 0 Cll
~~cns.CJ1
(t):T =r'........
Cll (/)- (I)
~~O::U~
OCllao
::::l O:J (J)
<a ~ ~~ g
....-(X)C"".j ,...,...
~~,:!~=r
.j:>. _Cllo
cn'::!~fT1::J
::TN 0 a.
o 0J .j:>. (J)
~ ::: CJ1 .:-
~1'Tl 0
::::::.C u .......~~
~g:-<OOo
Cll~03"""
~Qo'~ ......
en ............=r
CO '"'" 3 2. ~ (I)
(I) ::J
<e. g ~ ...... , U
::J , (I) -. 0 2.
::J::J :J......:J
:j"~ ,...oo-,-?
<0 -. 0::; -.
. ...... (I) ::J :J
o (f)- 0
:J VJ;4.......
a.(/)o::;::;
......0 ~<1l (I)
::Tc::;ol'Tl
(b~ !a.o
:J(I)o- (f)
~ooo"'"
weOo-
z......::J30
oog-(I)C
'0 ':J
:;:,-<-' a.
(b~ 00
~:!~~-<
02~'~
o::J _.c
:J a.:J,
lO s=r......~
......(I)~~N
:T:J. :IN
(I) ~ 0 _
~ <1>
, ::; (.,j
~ (/) o' VJ 0
.0::T0'
(f) ~ cO
I'Tl ~ iii'~ ro
Q 0 '" (I)
cn en........m r+
....- r+ tH (J)
(I) ~......
, . <1>
-<:CO::J..
/'<
01'Tl 3 ::J. 0 () - "
(J) <0 - 0 c:; i<!i' fT1
~Q;r-03<b<b::r(j)
(J):J . (J)3;;;......VJ
::J..a.o 0, -'<1>
'<~-roog~~g
e: ...... ~ ~ ~ ro- 0' ~ ~
a;~~xVJ...,,::J~-
~ I~=o'
o' ~ 5 ~ ~ - ~ ~ 5.0'
:JUl(J)aO W(J)::l:
I"""f- _ :l (J) 0
....... {p -.I, a -.
o::J..(.,j'-J<oa:a.o~
rT'< (J1.j:>.- I'Tl ~
::T Ul 0 C7l -; U 0 o~ ~
(J)::; ~OO(f) 0
o -.j:>.~ 5.......~'<
\),(J). :JrT~
2. (I) ~ -< ~ 0- -<: \) 3
~ =: - I -. (J) I S;
:J ~"O s'::J. 0J Cll
o (I) 3 _ N\O <0 '-J
~ 0 ~ (.,j <0 ;;:~-g
ro-(J)N(f) 0;00;4.
2 ~ 0 ..J>. 0 ~ ~ ..... o'
5' Q , ~ N '" g: ~
:J(J)ro-N::T.j:>.O (I) 0
_. Q <0 - '< '
:J , ~ '-J _ _-<:
~~- N~%=:;;'
ror+~:J""'~~~
..., 0.... lQ 0 (JJ
.....,...,...CDg:>~O~
I ::; :T c;::;: 0 -.
O(l)<D........,....=rC/)CT
, :J Cll::T Q Cll
o-~() ......_a.
00(1)1'Tl0::T
"1:,.... o::J(1)::Eo
(J),Ula. OW
_...., c ~ :::: rT
:JUl:J NW<1>cr
""UN(J)'(J)
Q ~ ~ S' co ~ ~ <e.
Z ~~~~Q'< 3
o 0 ~ Q .J>. ~ 0 S'
;4. ro- a Ul Cll 0 \0
::;Q~ ~o:J
~'(.,jO(J)oOQ
(1)"'(.,j0(1):J-......
(f) Q . C rT<o 3
roro~;;' 0
,." '< ::E......o
-<: - - (J)::;'U
- I 0 ..." ~ (I) ~ 2.
zQoooza.;;.
~ g- ~ ::J. ~ 0 cr 0
g: "1: g-...... 5= '< :J
(I) _. (f). ::; (J) ......
..., Q <b..., ~......
-<:g:a:OI'Tl-<:<1>~
Q~l'Tlggcn"Of"T1
15. 0 5l a. ...... a: 2. 0
CD ...... _. CD:J (f)
Cb='~ '-+,-+-
::!..~ oo~
'< ~ ....... ~'-<
.
"
P:>
-;;::~
0)> I'Tl
CDgjVJ
fT1 Z -;
::u::Uo
1'Tl-<::U
;::co-<
oc~
<-1'Tl
1'Tl'-;
CJ52 }:-
zr
G)
::E)> r
- , 0
:E'
,ro (")
oS; ^
0'
^52 OJ
z
roG) 0
OVJ X
X
1'Tl)>
~z Z
CJ 0
G) -f
~ !:l
I'Tl
VJ
~
r
,
CD
I'Tl
"
C
::u
z
Uj
I
I'Tl
CJ
!'l
-4
!'l
-...J
-...J
.
o
q
G.l
(J'J
o
o
01
l'-l
-4
~
.-.-:-:-:-:-::-:::-::-,..
..-..'::-.':-:-:-::-:'>
":'"-'<-='":--:":-:":-'
<>:,.:/:
/i~~
.... .".-.' .......
.- ..../..;-:-:'_...-.
...-...-......
.;0.
TTl
'3:'
)>
Z
. .;:.-.'.'
":-::-:::;--.
.- ',' -." '~~~_h_h_.
2!
~
if
~
I
~
D
'. --: ~:~ ::: :-: :
(")
o
<
rrJ
:::0
~o
-<
""OrrJ
}>
z:
0:
/2~o
"S C1~
..a ,-... C1
ff ~
...................---"".
"
". I.
I. ~.'"' .......".,~
~.-.,
<~t;
.0/.:,'.)
......,.....\...
. ,
", -.,
" j ....-,.,.
'.- .-" ....
'. " -.'
~
o
o
CJ
CJ
o
o
^
VJ
~
FAX MESSAGE
\
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER" FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727)562-4576
TO:
~.~.." \. b. \"C"V,-\ \"'\\\~ \ "
- ~ \' . t' \ ,_ \
LfLf 3- '.~Y7:~ ~)
L l~:)O'_~~ )..'0..', (JJ
\ .-=A - t-s. C.d-] .
FAX:
FROM:
DATE:
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
I')
.
e
.<::.=-...0.-;"
Supp. No.1
e
ZONING DISTRICTS
S 2-801.1
Tourist District liT"
DIVISION 8. TOURIST DISTRICT ("T")
Section 2-801. Intent and pUrpose.
The intent and purpose of the Tourist District
(liT") is to provide a safe and attractive tourist
destination in the City of Clearwater with a full
complement of tourist accommodations and con-
venient access to goods and services.
Section 2-801.1. Maximum development po-
tential.
The Tourist District ("T") may be located in
more than one land use category. It is the intent of
the T District that development be consistent
with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as
required by state law. The development potential
of a parcel of land within the T District shall be
determined by the standards found in this Devel-
opment Code as well as the Countywide Future
Land Use Designation of the property. Develop-
ment potential for the Countywide Future Land
Use Designations that apply to the T District are
CD2:63
e .
S 2-801.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
as follows:
Overnight
Countywide Future Maximum Dwelling Units Maximum Floor Area Ratio/ Accommodations
Land Use Designation per Acre of Land Impervious Surface Ratio Units per Acre
Resort Facilities High 30 dwelling units per acre FAR 1.0/ISR .95 40 units per acre
COrd. No. 6526-00, S 1, 6-15-00)
Section 2-802. Flexible standard develop-
ment.
The following uses are Level One permitted
uses in the T District subject to the standards and
criteria set out in this section and other applica-
ble provisions of Article 3.
Table 2-802. "T" District Flexible Standard Development Standards
Min. Lot Min. Lot Max.
Area Width Height Min. Setbacks Min. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Density Parking
Front Side Rear
Accessory Dwellings n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 30 units/ 1/unit
acre
Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35 10-15 10 20 n/a 5 per 1,000 GFA
Attached Dwellings 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 10 10-20 30 units/ 1.5 per unit
acre
Govemmental Uses(l) 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 3-4/1,000 GFA
Indoor Recreation/Entertain- 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 20 n/a 10 per 1,000 GFA
ment
Marinas 5,000 50 25 15 10 20 n/a 1 space per 2 slips
Medical Clinic 10,000 100 30-50 10-15 10 20 20 2-3/1,000 GFA
Nightclubs 5,000 50 35 15 10 20 n/a 10 per 1,000 GFA
Non-Residential Off-Street n/a n/a n/a 25 5 10 n/a n/a
Parking
Offices 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 3--4 spaces per
1,000 GFA
2.5 spaces per 1,000
sq. ft. of lot area or
Outdoor Recreation/Enter- as determined by
tainment 5,000 50 35 10-15 10 20 n/a the community de-
velopment director
based on ITE Man-
ual standards
Overnight Accommodations 20,000 100-150 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 40 rooms/ 1 per unit
acre
Parking Garages and Lots 20,000 100 50 15-25 10 10-20 nJa n/a
Supp. No.1
CD2:64
e .
ZONING DISTRICTS S 2-802
Table 2-802. "T" District Flexible Standard Development Standards
Min. Lot Min. Lot Max.
Area Width Height Min. Setbacks Min. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Density Parking
Front Side Rear
1 per 20,000 SF
land area or as de-
Parks and Recreation Facili- termined by the
nla nla 50 25 10 20 nla community develop-
ties ment coordinator
based on ITE Man-
ual standards
Public Transportation Facili- nla nla 10 nla nla nla nla nla
ties(2)
Sidewalk Vendors n/a n/a n/a n/a nla nla nla nla
Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25-35 10-15 0-10 10-20 nla 7-15 spaces per
10,000 1,000 GFA
Retail Sales and Services 5,000- 50-100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 nla 4-5 spaces per
10,000 1,000 GFA
Utility/Infrastructure Facili- n/a n/a nla 25 10 10 nla nla
ties(3)
(1) Govemmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous
like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional
which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
(2) Public transportation facilities shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added
to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment
to Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
(3) Utility/infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to
contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to
Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses.
Flexibility criteria:
A. Alcoholic beverage sales.
1. Location.
a. The parcel proposed for development
is not contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas;
b. The use of the parcel proposed for
development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
c. The design of all buildings complies
with the Tourist Distlict design guide-
lines in Division 5 of Article 3.
2. Front setback:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tlibutes to a more active and dy-
namic stl-eet life;
Supp. No.1
CD2:65
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design or appearance.
B. Attached dwellings.
1. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved de-
sign and appearance;
b. The increased height is necessary to
allow the improvement of off-street
parking on the ground floor of the
residential building.
2. Parhing: Off-street parking within the
footprint of the residential building is
designed and constructed to create a street
level facade comparable to the architec-
e
~ 2-802
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
3.
tural character and finishes of a residen-
tial building without parking on the ground
level;
Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
4.
Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design
and appearance;
The reduction in rear setback does
not reduce the amount oflandscaped
area otherwise required.
b.
c.
d.
e.
5. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
C. Governmental uses.
1. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved design
and appearance;
2. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
3. Location. The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
4. Setbacks:
a.
The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
Supp. No.1
CD2:66
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
e. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not reduce the amount of
landscaped area otherwise required.
5.
Off-street parking:
a. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determined by all
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of parcel proposed for development,
or parking is available through any
existing or planned and committed
parking facilities or the shared park-
ing formula in Article 2, Division 14;
b. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quired fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
mg purposes.
6. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
D. Indoor recreation / entertainment.
1.
The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of ATticle 3.
2.
Setbachs:
a.
The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
..
ZONING DISTRICTS 9 2-802
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved design and ap-
pearance;
c. The reduction in side setback does
not prevent access to the rear of any
building by emergency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side setback results
in an improved site plan, more effi-
cient parking or improved design
and appearance.
e. The reduction in side setback results
in landscaped areas in excess of the
minimum required.
3. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved design
and appearance.
E. Marinas.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not located in areas identified in the Com-
prehensive Plan as areas of environmen-
tal significance including:
a. The north end of Clearwater Beach;
b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds;
c. Cooper's Point;
d. Clearwater Harbor spoil islands;
e. Sand Key Park;
f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake.
2. No commercial activities other than the
mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be
permitted on any parcel of land which is
contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas, unless the marina facility is totally
screened from view from the contiguous
land which is designated as residential
and the hours of operation of the commer-
cial activities are limited to the time pe-
riod between 6:00 a.m.-9:00 p.m.;
3.
The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
Supp. No.1
CD2:67
F. Medical clinic.
1. The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment is compatible with surrounding
properties.
2. Off-street parking:
a. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determined by all
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of the parcel proposed for develop-
ment, or parking is available through
any existing or planned and commit-
ted parking facilities or the shared
parking formula in Article 2, Divi-
sion 14;
b. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
mg purposes.
3. Front setback:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
4. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved design or
appearance.
G. Nightclubs.
1. Location.
a. The parcel proposed for development
is not contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas;
b. The use of the parcel proposed for
development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of A...rticle 3.
2.
.
S 2:-802
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
H. Non-residential off-street parking.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
contiguous to the parcel on which the
non-residential use which will be served
by the off-street parking spaces, is located
and has a common boundary of at least 25
feet, or the parcel proposed for develop-
ment is located immediately across a pub-
lic road from the non-residential use which
will be served by the off-street parking
spaces, provided that access to the off-
street parking does not involve the use of
local streets which have residential units
on both sides of the street.
2. No off-street parking spaces are located in
the required front setback for detached
dwellings in the T District or within ten
feet, whichever is greater, or within (10)
feet of a side or rear lot line, except along
the common boundary of the parcel pro-
posed for development and the parcel on
which the non-residential use which will
be served by the off-street parking spaces.
3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by
a wall or fence of at least four feet in
height which is landscaped on the exter-
nal side with a continuous hedge or non-
deciduous vine.
4. All outdoor lighting is automatically
switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m.
5. All parking spaces shall be surface park-
ing.
6. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
1. Offices.
1.
The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment fronts on but will not involve
direct access to a major arterial street;
2. All sign age is a part ofthe comprehensive
sign progl'am;
3. The desigl1. of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design gl.lidelines in
Article 3 Division 5.
Supp. No.1
CD2:68
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic streetlife;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking or im-
proved design and appearance;
e. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs results in landscaped areas in
excess of the minimum required.
5. Off-street parking:
a. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determined by all
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of parcel proposed for development,
or parking is available through any
existing or planned and committed
parking facilities or the shared park-
ing formula in Article 2, Division 14;
b. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
mg purposes.
6. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved design
and appearance.
J. Outdoor recreation / entertainment.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is
designated as residential in the ZoninD"
Co
Atlas;
. .
ZONING DISTRICTS s 2-802
2. All signage is a part of a comprehensive
sign program;
3. Sound amplification is designed and con-
structed to ensure that no amplified sound
can be heard to the extent that the sound
is recognizable in terms of the meaning of
words or melody when wind conditions
are less than ten miles per hour at a
distance of more than 100 feet in all
directions or when wind conditions are
ten miles per hour or greater at a distance
of more than 150 feet in all directions;
4. All outdoor lighting is designed and con-
structed so that no light falls directly on
land other than the parcel proposed for
development;
5. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
6. Front setback:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active dynamic
street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
7. Off-street parking:
a. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determined by all
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of the parcel proposed for develop-
ment, or parking is available through
any existing or planned and commit-
ted parking facilities or the shared
parking formula in Article 2, Divi-
sion 14; or
b. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building are used for storage or other
non-parking demand-generating pur-
poses.
Supp. No.1
CD2:69
K. Overnight accommodations.
1. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
2. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan and/or improved de-
sign and appearance;
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
sign age is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
4. Setbacks:
The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking or im-
proved design and appearance;
e. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs does not reduce the amount of
landscaped area otherwise required.
5. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
a.
6. Lot width: The reduction in lot width will
not result in a building which is out of
scale with existing buildings in the imme-
diate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
L. Parking garages and lots.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to land designated as res-
idential in the Zoning Atlas;
.
.
9 2-.802
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
2. Access to and from the parking garage or
lot shall be based on the findings of a
transportation analysis approved by the
city;
3. The stacking spaces available for cars
waiting to pass through a parking ticket
dispensable or booth to enter the garage
or lot shall be based on the design and size
of the garage or lot;
4. Any frontage along a public street is land-
scaped or designed to be similar in char-
acter and use to other uses fronting on
each street for a distance of 250 feet in
either direction along the street or the
nearest intersections, whichever is less;
5. Parking structures are designed, con-
structed and finished so that the struc-
ture of the garage is architecturally com-
patible the design and character of adjacent
principal uses;
6. There is an unmet existing demand for
additional parking in the immediate vi-
cinity of the parcel proposed for develop-
ment;
7. Construction of a parking structure would
not otherwise be physically feasible;
8. The front and rear setbacks which are
provided are improved as an arcade or
with other active pedestrianJcommercial
areas for sidewalk cafes, sidewalk ven-
dors, street furniture or urban amenities;
9. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
10. Front setback:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active dynamic
street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance.
11. Rear setback:
a.
The reduction in rear setback does
not prevent access to the rear or any
building by emergency vehicles;
Supp. No.1
CD2:70
b. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in an improved site plan, more
efficient parking or improved design
and appearance;
c. The reduction in rear setback re-
sults in landscaping in excess of the
minimum required.
M. Parks and recreation facilities.
1. The proposed use is compatible with the
surrounding properties.
2. Off-street parking is screened from adja-
cent parcels of land and any street by a
landscaped wall or fence of at least four
feet in height.
3. All outdoor lighting is designed so that no
light fixtures cast light directly on adja-
cent land used for residential proposes.
4. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is
available on a shared basis as determined
by all existing land uses within 1,000
square feet of the parcel proposed for
development, or parking is available
through any existing or planned and com-
mitted parking facilities or the shared
parking formula in Article 3, Division 14.
N. Public transportation facilities.
1. The public transportation facilities are
not located within 1,000 feet of another
public transportation facility unless nec-
essary to serve established transit stops
with demonstrated ridership demand;
2. The public transportation facilities are
designed, located and landscaped so that
the structure of the facilities are screened
from view from any residential use or
land designated as residential in the Zon-
ing Atlas;
3. All lighting associated with the public
transportation facilities is designed and
located so that no light is cast directly on
any residential use or land designated as
residential in the Zoning Atlas;
The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
4.
e
.
ZONING DISTRICTS
O. Restaurants:
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
3. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan and/or improved de-
sign and appearance;
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
5. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking or im-
proved design and appearance;
e. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs does not reduce the amount of
landscaped area otherwise required.
Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
6.
Supp. No.1
CD2:71
!l 2-802
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
mg purposes;
b. Adequate off-street parking is avail-
able on a shared basis as determined
by all existing land uses within 1,000
feet of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment, or parking is available
through any existing or planned and
committed parking facilities or the
shared parking formula in Article 2,
Division 14;
c. Fast food restaurants shall not be
eligible for a reduction in the num-
ber of off-street parking spaces.
7. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines III
Division 5 of Article 3.
P. Retail sales and services.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
3. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved design
and appearance;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking or nn-
proved design and appearance;
e
~ 2-.802
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
e. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs does not reduce the amount of
landscaped area otherwise required;
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
ing purposes;
b. Adjacent land uses are of a nature
that there is a high probability that
patrons will use modes of transpor-
tation other than the automobile to
access the use;
c. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determined by all
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of the parcel proposed for develop-
ment, or parking is available through
any existing or planned and commit-
ted parking facilities or the shared
parking formula in Article 2, Divi-
sion 14.
6. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
Q. Sidewalk vendors.
1. The location of the sidewalk vendor does
not impair pedestrian movement.
2. The land occupied by a sidewalk vendor is
not designated or used for required off-
street parking.
R. Utility / infrastructure facilities.
1. No above ground structures are located
adjacent to a street right-of-way;
2. Any above ground structure other than
permitted telecommunication towers and
utility distribution lines located on or
along a rear lot line shall be screened
from view by a landscaped opaque wall or
fence which is at least two-thirds the
height of the above ground structure and
shall be landscaped with trees which five
years after installation substantially will
obscure the fence or wall and the above
ground structure;
3. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
COrd. No. 6526-00, 9 1, 6-15-00)
Section 2-803. Flexible development.
The following uses are Level Two permitted
uses permitted in the Tourist "T" District subject
to the standards and criteria set out in this
section and other applicable provisions of Article
3.
Table 2-803. "T" Flexible Development Standards
Min. Lot Min. Lot Jl1ax. Min. ivJin.
Area Width Height Front Min. Side Rear lvIin. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) ( ft.) Density Parking
Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nJa 5 per 1,000 GFA
Attached Dwellings 5,000- 50-100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10--20 30 units/ 1.5 per unit
10,000 acre
I Determined by the
30 units/ community devel-
Comprehensive Infill acre; 40 opment coordinator
nJa nJa nJa nJa nJa n/a based on the spe-
Redevelopment Project(l) rooms/ cific use and/or
I acre ITE Manual stan-
I dads
Limited Vehicle Sales and 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 I 10-20 nJa 4-5 spaces per
Display 1,000 GFA
50 I I
lVlarina Facilities 5,000 25 10-15 0-10 10-20 ! n/a 1 space per 2 slips
Supp. No.1
CD2:72
.
.
ZONING DISTRICTS
S 2-803
Table 2-803. "T" Flexible Development Standards
Min. Lot Min. Lot Max. Min. Min.
Area Width Height Front Min. Side Rear Min. Off-Street
Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Density Parking
Nightclubs 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nJa 10 per 1,000 GFA
Offices 10,000 100 35-100 0-15 0--10 10-20 nJa 3--4 spaces per
1,000 GFA
2.5 spaces per
1,000 SQ FT of lot
area or as deter-
Outdoor Recreation/Enter- 5,000 50 35 5-15 0-10 10-20 nJa mined by the com-
tainment munity develop-
ment coordinator
based on ITE Man-
ual standards
Overnight Accommodations 10,000- 100-150 35-100 0-15 0-10 0-20 40 rooms! 1 per unit
20,000 acre
Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25--100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nJa 7-15 spaces per
10,000 1,000 GFA
Retail sales and services 5,000- 50--100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 nJa 4--5 spaces per
10,000 1,000 GFA
(1) Any use approved for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project shall be permitted by the
underlying Future Land Use Plan Map designation.
Flexibility criteria:
A. Alcoholic beverage sales.
1. Location:
a. The parcel proposed for development
is not contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas;
b. The use of the parcel proposed for
development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
2. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan and/or improved de-
sign and appearance;
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
gTade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless the sign
is a paTt of a comprehensive sign pro-
gram;
4. Setbacks:
a.
The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
Supp. No.1
CD2:73
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
5. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines m
Division 5 of Article 3.
B. Attached dwellings.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to an arterial street;
2.
.
S 2-803
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
3. Height:
a. The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved de-
sign and appearance;
b. The increased height is necessary to
allow the improvement of off-street
parking on the ground floor of the
residential building;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building for storage or other non-
parking demand -generating purposes
or that the nature of the individual
dwelling units and their location is
likely to lead to dependency on non-
automobile modes of transportation;
b. Off-street parking within the foot-
print of the residential building is
designed and constructed to create a
street level facade comparable to the
architectural character and finishes
of a residential building without park-
ing on the ground level.
6. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
Supp. No.1
CD2:74
C. Comprehensive infill redevelopment projects.
1. The development or redevelopment of the
parcel proposed for development is other-
wise impractical without deviations from
the use, intensity and development stan-
dards;
2. The development of the parcel proposed
for development as a comprehensive infill
redevelopment project will not reduce the
fair market value of abutting properties;
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill
redevelopment project are otherwise per-
mitted in the City of Clearwater;
4. The uses or mix of uses within the com-
prehensive infill redevelopment project
are compatible with adjacent land uses;
5. Suitable sites for development or redevel-
opment of the uses or mix of uses within
the comprehensive infill redevelopment
project are not otherwise available in the
City of Clearwater;
6. The development of the parcel proposed
for development as a comprehensive infill
redevelopment project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
7. The design of the proposed comprehen-
sive infill redevelopment project creates a
form and function which enhances the
community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment and the City of Clearwater as a
whole;
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required
setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community
character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole;
9. Adequate off-street parking in the imme-
diate vicinity according to the shared park-
ing formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will
be available to avoid on-street parking in
the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro-
posed for development;
.
.
ZONING DISTRICTS
10. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
D. Limited vehicle sales and display.
1. The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment shall be located in an enclosed
structure.
2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel-
opment shall have no outdoor displays.
3 . No vehicle service shall be provided on
the parcel proposed for development.
E. Marina facilities.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not located in areas identified in the Com-
prehensive Plan as areas of environmen-
tal significance including:
a. The north end of Clearwater Beach;
b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds;
c. Cooper's Point;
d. Clearwater Harbor spoil islands;
e. Sand Key Park;
f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake.
2. No commercial activities other than the
mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be
permitted on any parcel of land which is
contiguous to a parcel of land which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas, unless the marina facility is totally
screened from view from the contiguous
land which is designated as residential
and the hours of operation of the commer-
cial activities are limited to the time pe-
riod between sunrise and sunset;
3. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
Supp. No.1
CD2:75
~ 2-803
4.
The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance.
The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
c.
F. Nightclubs.
1. Location:
a. The parcel proposed for development
is not contiguous to a parcel of land
which is designated as residential in
the Zoning Atlas;
b. The use of the parcel proposed for
development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
2. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan and/or improved de-
sign and appearance;
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless the sign
is a part of a comprehensive sign pro-
gram;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
-
~ 2"803
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
5. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
G. Offices.
1. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improved design
and appearance;
2. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
signage is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
3. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
mg purposes;
b. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determined by all
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
Supp. No.1
CD2:76
6.
of the parcel proposed for develop-
ment, or parking is available through
existing or planned and committed
parking facilities or the shared park-
ing formula in Article 3, Division 14.
The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
H. Outdoor recreation / entertainment.
1. The parcel proposed for development is
not contiguous to a parcel ofland which is
designated as residential in the Zoning
Atlas;
2. All sign age is a part of a comprehensive
sign program;
3. Sound amplification is designed and con-
structed to ensure that no amplified sound
can be heard to the extent that the sound
is recognizable in meaning of or identity
of a melody when wind conditions are less
than ten miles per hour at a distance of
more than 100 feet in all directions or
when wind conditions are ten miles per
hour or grater at a distance of more than
150 feet in all directions;
4. All outdoor lighting is designed and con-
structed so that no light falls directly on
land other than the parcel proposed for
development;
5. Setbachs:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance.
-
e
ZONING DISTRICTS
6. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
7. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is
available on a shared basis as determined
by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of the parcel proposed for development, or
parking is available through any existing
or planned and committed parking facili-
ties or the shared parking formula in
Article 3, Division 14.
I. Overnight accommodations.
1. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to an arterial street;
2. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan and/or improved de-
sign and appearance;
3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless such
sign age is a part of an approved compre-
hensive sign program;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
5. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of ATticle 3.
6. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area anclJor lot width will not result in a
Supp. No.1
CD2:77
~ 2-803
building which is out of scale with exist-
ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development.
J. Restaurants.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
3. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan and/or improved de-
sign and appearance;
4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or
located so that any portion of the sign is
more than six feet above the finished
grade of the front lot line of the parcel
proposed for development unless the sign
is a part of a comprehensive sign pro-
gram;
5. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear set-
back does not prevent access to the
rear of any building by emergency
vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set- .
back results in an improved site plan,
more efficient parking or improved
design and appearance;
6. Off-street parking:
a.
The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
e e
S 2-803 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
building for storage or other non-
parking demand-generating purposes;
b. Fast food restaurants shall not be
eligible for a reduction in the num-
ber of off-street parking spaces;
c. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determined by all
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of the parcel proposed for develop-
ment, or parking is available through
any existing or planned and commit-
ted parking facilities or the shared
parking formulas in Article 3, Divi-
sion 14.
7. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
K. Retail sales and services.
1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot
area will not result in a building which is
out of scale with existing buildings in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
Location: The use of the parcel proposed
for development will not involve direct
access to a major arterial street;
2.
3. Height: The increased height results in an
improved site plan or improyed design
and appearance;
4. Setbacks:
a. The reduction in front setback con-
tributes to a more active and dy-
namic street life;
b. The reduction in front setback re-
sults in an improved site plan or
improved design and appearance;
c. The reduction in side and rear and
setbacks does not prevent access to
the rear of any building by emer-
gency vehicles;
d. The reduction in side and rear set-
backs results in an improved site
plan, more efficient parking or im-
proved design and appearance;
Supp. No.1 CD2:78
5. Off-street parking:
a. The physical characteristics of a pro-
posed building are such that the
likely uses of the property will re-
quire fewer parking spaces per floor
area than otherwise required or that
the use of significant portions of the
building will be used for storage or
other non-parking demand-generat-
mg purposes.
b. Adjacent land uses are of a nature
that there is a high probability that
patrons will use modes of transpor-
tation other than the automobile to
access the use;
c. Adequate parking is available on a
shared basis as determi:p.ed by an
existing land uses within 1,000 feet
of the parcel proposed for develop-
ment, or parking is available through
any existing or planned and commit-
ted parking facilities or the shared
parking formula in Article 3, Divi-
sion 14.
6. The design of all buildings complies with
the Tourist District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
COrd. No. 6526-00, S 1, 6-15-00) .
--
--
Presentation Materials
FL 00-10-46
880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue
-
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD - Presentation Outline
CASE: FL 00-10-46
ADDRESS: 880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue
REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of attached
dwellings from 35 feet to 100 feet and to reduce the (north) side setback
from 10 feet to three feet (to an emergency access aisle), with a
Comprehensive Landscape Program.
I. Site Description
A. General
1. 8.89 acres
2. north of downtown
3. Clearwater Harbor to the west
4. 4.5 acres is submerged land
5. 4.37 upland acres
6. Sloped parcel wI 23 feet grade differential
B. Existing structures
1. Wood-frames house and two-story garage wI rental unit-
northeast
2. Boat repair and storage bays - north property line
3. Open and covered boat slips - east marina end
4. Sun Cruz charter boat I masonry building - south
5. 2,000 sJ. bait shop - southwest comer
6. two-story masonry building - between Osceola and Ft. Hanison
7. asphalt covers site
8. poorly maintained I poor condition
II. Neighborhood Character
A. North Ward Elementary School- east
B. Single-family I Multi-family northwest
C. Funeral Home I Clearwater Little Theater - south
D. Seminole Street boat launching ramp - southwest
E. Mix of land uses - fair condition
m. Land Use Regulationsl Periphery Plan
A. Multiple Zoning Districts
1. Tourist - west
2. Medium Density Residential - northeast
3. Commercial- east
4. Preservation - water
B. Periphery Plan
1. The City Commission adopted the Periphery Plan in 1993
2. identified the vicinity as a redevelopment area that has a locational
advantage of being in the vicinity of the City's downtown.
3. land use plan amendment - Central Business District
.
e
4. appropriate Downtown zoning district was never applied
5. rezoning to the Downtown district is scheduled for February 2001.
6. Plan has been recommended for approval by the Community
Development Board
C. Intensity / Density
1. The Comprehensive Plan references the special area plan.
2. The Periphery Plan allows a maximum density of
a. 50 dwelling units per acre for parcels in excess of two acres.
The Plan allows a maximum
b. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.50 for nonresidential uses.
IV. Site Plan Summary
A. Includes:
1. Mixed-use, Key West-style village and marina
2. condominium building with 140 units,
3. a restaurant,
4. retail space,
5. an office building and
6. 112 plivate boat slips
B. Condominiums
1. Remove wood-frame house, two-story garage, and boat repair facilities
2. eight-story condominium building
3. 21O-space parking garage.
4. light coral colored stucco accented by blue
5. hip/mansard roofing
6. Each unit will have balconies overlooking the bay.
C. Restaurant! Retail
1. Remove the Sun Cruz charter services and masonry building
2. 7,000 square-foot restaurant
3. deck that extends into the private marina over the water
4. remodeled retail shop
5. rental office.
6. Designed in keeping with the project's Key West architecture and
color scheme.
7. proposed approximately two feet from the south property line
8. The Fire Code requires 20-foot emergency access aisle
9. staff recommends this issue be addressed before the issuance of a
building permit for the restaurant and/or retail/office building.
10. Parking
a. parking for the restaurant must be on site
b. shall not impact the public boat ramp parking.
c. barrier should be constructed to prevent restaurant patrons
from parking at the boat ramp propelty.
D. Boat Slips
1. Retain 112 boat slips;
2. 40 slips reserved for the condominium
3. 72 slips to be leased to the general public
-
e
4. remove any covered docks The
5. eliminate existing 92 "high and dry" boat storage bays
E. Office Building
1. Converted to a larger 4,500 square feet office.
F. Access (ingress/egress)
1. Two vehicular access from North Osceola Avenue;
2. Office building is accessible from North Osceola A venue and Ft.
Harrison Avenue.
a. building has visibility constraints and traffic hazards.
b. Recommend close Ft. Harrison curb cut
3. Pedestrian pathways
4. six-foot sidewalk - North Osceola Avenue.
G. Intensity
1. Consistent with the 1993 Periphery Plan/Periphery Plan 2000
2. FAR 0.5
3. 50 dwelling units per acre
4. 4.37 of upland acreage - intensity
5. meets the density and intensity requirements
6. does not utilize all of its development potential
v. Request
A. Specific:
1. Increase the height of the condominium building from 35 feet to 100
feet
2. reduce the (north) side setback from 10 feet to three feet for an
emergency access aisle.
3. Comprehensive Landscape Program.
4. The other elements of the proposal do not require approval from the
Community Development Board.
B. Height
1. The Tourist District allows Flexible Development maXImum of
100 feet.
2. 23 feet grade differential
3. perceived at 77 feet from Ft. Hanison A venue
4. Other heights
a. Harbor Bluffs waterfront condominium - approximately
100 feet.
b. the Osceola Bay Club - 150 feet
c. The Belvedere Apartments - 75 feet.
5. The Downtown District
a. peImits up to 150 feet
b. front on Clearwater Harbor
C. Setback Reduction
1. 30-foot emergency vehicle access aisle
2. site constraints
e
--
VI. Recommendation
A. Approval wi conditions
B. Conditions
1. That a building permit for either the attached dwellings or
restaurant be submitted within two years from approval of the site
plan;
2. That the existing chain link fence along the south property line be
replaced with a decorative fence including masonry columns and
metal grills;
3. That a gate be installed along the south property line to prevent
restaurant patrons from parking at the Seminole Boat Ramp
property;
4. That the existing curb cut along the west side of Ft. Harrison
A venue be removed and reflected on a revised site plan;
5. That all signage be integrated/coordinated with the building
architecture and all freestanding signs be limited to monument-
style signs;
6. That the final design of all new buildings be architecturally
coordinated and consistent with the conceptual elevations as
submitted;
7. That emergency access be provided to the south/west of the
proposed restaurant/retail buildings, to the satisfaction of the Fire
Marshall, prior to issuance of building permits; and
8. That the cover for the boat slips along the east end of the marina be
removed prior to any building permits for the attached dwellings.
e
r-L~
rAQlv/;~fi,. rU/t/jf\l~
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Morris, William
Tuesday, November 07,20002:31 PM
Fierce, Lisa
Stone, Ralph
RE:
'\
Oh the fi;;;tissue, I would prefer not to hire an architect, each individual dock space is a different size, many have different
loading requirements, "queing issues" for passengers... ie the 75 people who congregate at pirate ship to board as
compared to the 6 who go charter fishing. The "six pack" (six passenger for hire charter boats) live almost trip to trip and
use a "desk and an umbrella". I think we should require and "new structures" to be presented with a site plan, drawings
etc done in accordance with a "design standard" ie the tropical seascape we have generally adopted out here. What ever
the planners come up with is fine, have the business owner have something built to a standard... If I hire an arch teet I'll be
doing building designs for each individual commercial tenant... does the existing standard/beach plan have
height/setback/squarefoot/roof line/color/trim standards?
Lisa: with reguard to "one large booth" its a management nightmare, great idea in theory and it does work in other places...
if I was starting from scratch I would do it... here however, everyone would feel that "the otherguy" got the best trips, first
bookings, etc... unless we want to go to the commission to change way we operate the commercial side of the marina, this
one will meet strong opposition...
Lisa/Ralph: Can we just give the commercial tenant the design parameters, color requirements and let them hire the
architech? If I hired and architech today I have no idea what to tell him... I do know that the bigger booths, have used the
same architech who designed the lifeguard office/pier 60 parking lot attendent structure and he visually fits what is already
here along the tropical seascape theme with no guidence whatsoever... thanks, Bill M
-----Original Message-----
From: Fierce, Lisa
Sent: Tuesday, November 07,2000 1 :01 PM
To: Morris, William
Subject:
hey bill,
i have two issues to discuss with you. (sorry for the long-winded em ail upfront)
1) regarding ticket booths on city property, contrary to popular belief, we do not have a design on file against which we
review proposals on the beach. we do have the very preliminary "beach by design" plan that is making its rounds to the
public and may be adopted by the commission in december/january. it, however, does not provide any specifics on things
like ticket booths (it addressed bigger buildings primarily).
i discussed this with ralph. in absence of any good design information that we can share with customers, he thinks we
need to hire an architect to create a design. he asked that you take the lead on this.
within the last week, i have heard of two people who would like to redesign/rebuild their ticket booths (including the lady
with the sea screamer). it may make sense for you to get a feel if there are others and find out what they want to do.
if there is an interim need for someone to fix their ticket booth, we can approve something temporarily with the
understanding that it will need to conform with whatever we come up with in the final deSigti r~Uld Jike.1o 9Ot1' \
1 ", 'J ,
la' . ;
e
e
feedback on all of this before i contact joyce graves again.
2) i need your comments on the marina development proposal that we reviewed yesterday at the drc. (ryan givens is the
case planner for that one in case you need details). that case will go to the community development board in december.
2
.
vi ~fJWIUf))
f3,/hz/tt:~ / ~ mi!atI;J
fJtJt /kl1u~ / /)&1 1Jau,t< / c/ t1fJrUk'
/2ML
. f;~. .
1t5t5iihttlt)J- ()n /JiJ}/f( 7JJd9-
taLb-34j?Y Iff~
t ~F~tl/'/7B-
7bU/)-1a>>'.~?t9176-
jtl;(){)lJ 1J --. ~~$tL
.
de/de -- (If-fc:l/)
)Yn~g-
/~
-J-buy-$:>h2} t5Jpa (Itbkr/D ;fviP?tif' ,1,?//OZ.) ji;y /aw~
e;p~
/;Mzj _, ~#4F~
~aojl/~ 1J1W#?~V' @: h~?#~7K. .
/~f'fP/~--;1'/)~ ~'&:r-k: -~Y//Pn?1f.
?JOI%b1"j/J'.ljllffZLh
- ~tjO IWm tW~t/#t; ~ ffi;u. fflffl?/ltfL ~Z#-
-,#V~- taU/fJz416 h a?~ /Ut/uJ}O
-~. f);Jfft/d), - /~ AJ a~~
--fau.- .-' ~ WPljfrtJW/71h1jg> I~
-1J;h~/~ --a:i6g/~r:?)~.?
- ?t7.duiJr;&;;. /fry;:;- M~ /tlla:;/J~ c9~t:Tt<.J
___.n~. 1/J1t/ar Cthc~~rhth/
~;J7Zf)/t!{e 7/t2fJha/?!- ?CJ~/
t/Jm /~-
-/J/J-dp;;Ji72:tR.. ~/;Uf~d/~?~ -~~
~ p~ ~? ~ #::y /ww- /lJauw&<-..h Uf
() /JJavt/~ hI katJ/c
--#f/tIf- ~~ It> ~!?: aCtc4.7-Ji;r /c:?<-/ t/.?7ZOJ -
~. aJ/MlF0J7t7lr (?) ~ ~ am.Lm-<<:.
LfJI1lI-~ .~ #;/ZaJ -4,h//;-~/aAf)
(~ ., /JW71ff7l7. It- 7/};U/Am)- vi S,?;l ~.
~
e
-
/01/0, 'MI)I.J
d: /{)JIMVG./ P.!bhil{./ J~*
~I( k2L ~iHp;OJ:tz
I~~ //Je;~ . -tjt(/ao /h~
Zn<<, h~/Z&Jh- ~/h~~ - ~
14~ /lJJJ1d#P- 92J tk//r ~
/40 tUw . It- Pt$/t;?
lit fl/p5~~/n?/Jt
.. ftJ ctatJR/1o &;/;4&J
#ltJteOJ<. f"1~/h~/-- /aW~.
~O $/;UtJlafttflu'-
/Zh1/4u!'/tJ )Je ~t m~~
.. ~~~~&?~~
~3-~~
-I- ~//7d a~j/wd
ff/t:#~
JWd~J5J1Puo )1~.;?/~
J~~~~.--~ /~ ---~JadP4\&
jJI1t17Jr-~~ - ~arp;6
~/d;j7tz:e /hJn &;5h:I~
fpiJ~-
t(;aJt:(; ~i)iI2p.;e. ~/ -ffiy .PPft?trl#H6-
.
e,
fOJIO~Z.
!/ad:~wp - ~~ ;Io~ AlP jP/fj-
/1fY !/tJtP!IY ~
f~i-MarV 4d4kP~~rdl, '/
., -flaq~)7~+MuJ .
~j:ja/ ;e1:&rJi;f1id5;~ ~ ~ '
!I Jzi6~aJf U~~ Jl~
~ #~ ~J'~L
~;o- ~ pJjj?hw- ~W-qr
II m/:J777ei-~r;;/+ f~~~Nj;2-
~
, ~h}'}~~~;/".-Ld-T V}. w?,'
; ~-?+ Lily /op$;7/k (&p/J/~~~
.. -lJ r- ~~/~#
do-Y~ //I~ ~ #P1$Jtt~;4C - 7. .
d)zdj/ ~,P~ /5fttP !ljI}tJ)p///i!J
;WIJlC6 ~~ -1J()73k!~W~&:l~
?J~ 10/'11/ /l;ya/Pa:f0ft?/?U/4/'7~T-
. flJiU/htJ--- {fJIP/hr /~~ :Jo(JZJ4J~;d'LL
. IO/J;Yd/,J(.. ~1 jt ;A: "l"ltJ1j. f;7/lki>f/:f?/d4:9
. /Yj f!tr: Ift??//{ .
.
e
light function with battery back-up; 10) early warning fire detection system be
installed prior to business operation; 11) Fire Department be granted access to allow
inspections at any time as deemed necessary; and 12) all exit doors to remain
unlocked and unblocked during business hours. Either key remain in exit door that
lacks a thumb latch or thumb latch be installed.
Item #D6 - 1426 McMullen-Booth Road: La Carnda Holdinq Company/James Rapp
(Sunset Mercantile Limited Partnership) - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible
development approval to permit a self-storage business in IRT District with a
reduction in required number of parking spaces from 174 spaces to 147 spaces, as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (amendment to approved site
plan - June 20, 2000 Community Development Board Meeting) at H.H. Baskin's
Replat, part of Tract 1. FL 00-10-40
ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 with CONDITION: limit attached signage to 48 square
feet.
Item #D7 - 14 S. Everqreen Avenue: Dennis R. & Rebecca Dunn/John N. & Ann
Bovee (First Impressions) - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development
approval of a light assembly establishment within the Commercial District with a
reduction in required parking from 6 spaces to 4 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape Program at Overbrook, Blk
3, Lots 19 & 20. FL 00-10-37
ACTION - APPROVED - 7:0 with CONDITION: no change or use permitted which
requires more than four parking spaces.
Item #D8 - 1825 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard: Kurdi Real Estate Inc./Seydo M. Kurdi
(Amscot Corporation) - Owner/Applicant. Request flexible development approval to
permit problematic use in Commercial District within a building which does not meet
all current land development regulations and is within 500 feet of another
problematic use, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with
Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape Program at Sec 13-29-
15, M&B 32.04. FL 00-10-47
ACTION - APPROVED - 6:1 with CONDITIONS: 1) limit signage to two attached
signs, with no freestanding signs and 2) prohibit reference to problematic use,
check cashing, on any signs visible from public right-of-way or adjacent properties.
Item #D9 - 880, 900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue: Jacinto Castellano & Elena
Betes/Jim Dan Inc. (Florida Marine & Resort Developers, Inc.) - Owner/Applicant.
Request flexible development approval to increase height of attached dwellings from
35 feet to 100 feet, reduce north side setback from 10 feet to 3 feet, and permit a
non-residential parking lot within the MDR District, with a Comprehensive
Landscape Program at J.A. Gorra's Sub, Blk 2, Lots 1-3, Sue Barco Sub, Lots 1,
13-14 & 22-23, and F.T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10 & triangle land to west.
FLOO-10-46
acd 1 200
3
12/12/00
e
.
ACTION - APPROVED - 6:0 with CONDITIONS: 1) submit building permit for either
attached dwellings or restaurant within two years of site plan approval; 2) replace
chain link fence along south property line with decorative fence to include masonry
columns & metal grills; 3) install gate along south property line to prevent restaurant
patrons from parking on Seminole Boat Ramp property; 4) remove curb cut along
west side of Ft. Harrison Avenue and reflect change on revised site plan; 5)
integrate/coordinate all signage with building architecture & limit all freestanding
signs to monument-style signs; 6) architecturally coordinate final design of all new
buildings to be consistent with conceptual elevations as submitted; 7) provide
emergency access to south/west of proposed restaurant/retail buildings to
satisfaction of Fire Marshall, prior to issuance of building permits; 8) remove cover
for boat slips along marina's east end prior to obtaining any building permits for
attached dwellings; 9) orient balconies and views from northernmost bank of
condominium units toward northwest; 10) limit extension of condominium building
line adjacent to residential properties to the north farther east than what is generally
shown on submitted sketch; 11) do not locate air conditioners or mechanical
equipment along northern & eastern property lines of subject property with
preference to locate on roof; and 12) prohibit outdoor live music or outdoor
speakers at proposed restaurant.
ITEM E - DIRECTOR'S ITEMS
Board to hear rezoning request for Connelly property on 01/23/01.
Request to improve sound system in Chambers. Staff to review
Concern expressed property surveys should be sealed and match site plan. Staff to
review.
ITEM F - ADJOURNMENT - 4:51 p.m.
acd 1200
4
12/12/00
e
tI
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
December 12, 2000, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112
South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
1. Warren A. & Beth S. Wilson, III are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the side (west)
setback from 15 ft to 6 ft and reduce the rear setback from 25 ft to 10 ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project at
3042 Geiger Ct., Landmark Palms, Lot 11 and part of Lot 12. FL 00-10-36
2. Lawrence E. & B. Jane Boone is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the side (west)
setback from 15 ft to 8.5 ft as part of a Residential Infill Project at 3164 San Pedro St., Del Oro Estates, Lot 17.
FL 00-10-38
3. Joseph C. Pattv, Jr., TRE is requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the side setback (east)
from 15ft to 13 ft and to reduce the rear setback (south) from 25ft to 23ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project
at 1931 Oak Ridge Ct., Oak Ridge Court Estates, Lot 1. FL 00-10-39
4. John & Catherine M. Breen are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the side setback (east)
from 15ft to 13 ft and to reduce the rear setback (south) from 25 ft to 23 ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project
at 3261 San Pedro St., Del Oro Groves, Lots 329-331. FL 00-10-41
5. Warren LTD / Business Records Management, Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval of a
temporary records storage business in the Downtown District not to exceed one year, a part of a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project at 105 S. Mvrtle Ave., Tack and Warren, Lot 3. FL 00-10-48
6. La Canada Holding Company / James Rapp (Sunset Mercantile Limited Partnership) are requesting a
flexible development approval to permit a self-storage business in the IRT District with a reduction in the
required number of parking spaces from 174 spaces to 147 spaces, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project (amendment to approved site plan - June 20, 2000 Community Development Board
Meeting) at 1426 McMullen Booth Rd., H.H. Baskin's Replat, part of Tract 1. FL 00-10-40
7. Dennis R. & Rebecca Dunn / John N. & Ann Bovce (First Impressions) are requesting a flexible
development approval of a light assembly establishment within the Commercial District with a reduction in
required parking from 6 spaces to 4 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with
Comprehensive Landscape Program at 14 S. Evergreen Ave., Overbrook, Elk 3, Lots 19 & 20. FL 00-10-37
8. Kurdi Real Estate Inc. / Seydo M. Kurdi (Amscot Corporation) is requesting a flexible development
approval to permit a problematic use in the Commercial District within a building which does not meet all the
current land development regulations and is located within 500 ft of another problematic use, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, with Comprehensive Sign Program and Comprehensive Landscape
Program at 1825 Gulf to Bav Blvd., Sec 13-29-15, M&B 32.04. FL 00-10-47
9. !llcinto Castellano & Elena Betes / Jim Dan Incorporated (Florida Marine & Resort Developers, Inc.) are
requesting a flexible development approval to increase the height of attached dwellings from 35 ft to 100 ft,
reduce the side (north) setback from 10ft to 3ft, and permit a non-residential parking lot within the MDR
District, with a Comprehensive Landscape Program at 900 N. Osceola AYe.,1~Gm:r3'-5-Sub~1L2,-LOl~3~
Sue Barco Sub, Lots 1, 13-14 & 22-23, and F.T. Blish's Sub, Lots 1-3 & 8-10 & tringlland to west. FLOO-I0-
46
10. (cont. from 11/21/00) Charalampos & Sevasti Alexiou (Kirk Construction) are requesting a t1exible
development approval to reduce the front setback from 10ft to 0 ft, reduce the rear setback from lOft to 0 ft and
ta
-
reduce the required number of parking spaces from 71 spaces to 13 parking spaces, reduce required number of
handicap spaces from 6 to 1, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project at 7 Rockawav St.,
Miller's Replat, Lots 2, 3 & vacated Beach Dr. on West. FL 00-07-29
11. (cont. from 11/21/00) Thanh Phuoc & Kimtruc Thi Nguven is requesting a flexible development approval
of a nightclub within the Commercial District, with a redeuction in the required number of parking spaces from
20 spaces to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with Comprehensive Landscape
Program at 3006 Gulf-to-Bav Blvd., Bay View City Sub, Elk 8, Lots 8, 9, 10 & 1/2 of vac alley on N less Rd.
right-of-way on S. FL 00-08-33
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the
PlaIming and Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to
appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a
record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is
made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute
286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for
review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater,
Planning and Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN
500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD 11~ LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY
PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
rARTlCIPATE IN THIS MEETI1~G SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR
REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 11-25-00
e
'bD~\d L.. ' +-\cx.y r( l \
',70 I-si~~ Wo.-y 'tf:=-30S
(~\t:curu..:o.:~efj ~L '3~ 70"7
F\ Dr\~ 'f'\"\o-\'-\"t: ~ \(esc.r+ Dellel opel's
'dl{-~'S 'Os. I q S'D: +e 350
l-\o \'\J.CA'f) F 1- 3f+<til1
1"jOF~GI~t'i" :;:,;TE:VEt',! F~
1"ior~CiPI~,j" v I CJ.< 1 I:::
:501 CE.D(iR ST
CL,I:::Plr'~hl(~ TE:R F:L,
3:3755 :;;;002
JHi DA~! H,le
900 N OSCI:::OLA AVE
CL,E(~RW(iTER F'L,
/
:3; ~5 '7 .:s 5 ~) () ::3; ~3
PAYNE"S OIL CO INC
607 ~"! I CHOLSOh! ~3T
CL.E:::AR\!Ji;~ TE:F~ FL
3:37',!::,.5, 3()3.:;,
TFUHIGI"I COF7.P
1()04 DRE~\! ST
CL"EI~F7.I"~I~TER F~L
:5:::S7t:;..5 3C):2:3;
CLE0IF?II\!~~ T[F<~" C
112 5 OSC~~':= ,,('I
PO BO>< ',/48
CL,E(" ""I(>ITER FL_
C U':: r:i F~ I,..,! (H r:~: R "
PO BO>< 47 ""
CLE:(-'iF(\!,' "E:F:'~
Y OF
D{lNivi(iF<" .J J I ['-Ie
::,,254 f"iPISTEr.;:s Dr~~
I,::; L. E: (~ f~ 1.^,1I'~ T E: F<~ F~ L,
::<;3761 ,1819
('IVE:
SCI FUNERAL SERV FL.A INC
C/O ):" jvi;'lt., (?]E:t"iENT C:OF~P
PROF ::: -, '\' ",< DEPT
P O'O'~
HiJUST01",j
. '
<;~O/\\f' f qc~ ~ O~~2((
O\~
FL OtJ.-IO-JfCp CD8 I~-id-OO
C13 (,;0 J RJ :)-F)
J.<ISCHKE-WOLBRANDT" CHRISTIN
303 CE~Dt~R ::;T
CL,F:(if7.lilll'~ TEH FL"
:~; ~3 '/ ~s .:1 :3; () () 2
PINELLAS 80 OF PUB INST
PO [30)( 2942
l.,(iRGO n~
~)37.l9) 2:S'4':?
CL.EARWATER GAHDEN CLUB
.(1r;):::. SE:I'1 I HOLE ST
Cl."E(-)R\^!n TEF~ FL~
~3~37'551 3~36,0
RICHARDSON" ROBERT R
RICHnRDSON. DEBORAH A
700 N GARDEN AVE
CLEf~IRIt.,1(>rTE~r-~ FL
:)~:S ~15.S ;:) ~3 213
WEST COAST INLAND
HnVlCiATION DISTRICT
POBOX 1845-
VE:t',J, I C;F~ FL
'S.42Er4 1.;;3<',15
.JOF~D(iC I He
505 CONSUMERS RD STE 1000
WILLOWDALE ONTARIO M2J
- C At-,j P~I 0 (~
SCI FUNE:RAL SERV FLA INC
C/o SCI MANAGE:MENT CORP
PROPERTY TAX DE:PT
P 0 E~:())( 1:;;0548
HOUSTON T>< 772./<::1 - OS-LlY'
,. c....c............... ~.,.'.,,/-,. '",'
AL..L[N" FR[D ~;~
1,'.)0 [30)< 275
CL,E(,~RliJ(;~TE:R FL
:)(>)75/ 0275
CLE:ARWATER CITY OF
PO E:OX 48
(~I...E('j :""An~F<: FL...
e
-
/ '/ .ill. '7 1..."'..".) c..f (J
'-'l [;~~An',.! (, ~r-crl 7"" I '--"( CJF
1....... ..... ..... r~ v' Pi !..::~ r'\ ,':I .....
PO BOX 47"43'
CL[I0jm\.I~ ~... h~ F7L.
JOHNSON. WILLIAM M JR
1659 LOrJ.Gi sr
C;L.EARW(~TER FL_
3Z;'/ 51E, ~St}31
WHITEHURST. LEON JR
C/O BASKIN, HAMDEN HIlI
720 SNUG I SU~ND
CL.EAF~~\)(irEr--< f~L
3~57~~~~ 7 1831
1-), (',VE
HOUSTOi"1 T::<
J' 'v" ......'....f t..~1
PIJPCEL_L.. L.E:E H
PURCEL.L.. JANET L
1012 N OSCEOLA AVE
CL. EI~r~~I,I,I(~1 TEF~ F~L.
H(iDLEY. J('II'.1E:3 I~
HADLEY. JUDITH G
512 CL.EVELAND ST ~ M-S 201
Cl_[~Af~~\Jr, TEr;~ F L
557 5'=:, 4002~
:5 :5 ~/ !) .~~I ~~; t:) t~ (..1
LOPEZ. CAPLOS JR
L.OF'E? CCIL.L.EEN A
1.414 SUt~SET Df~
CL^E(~R~I,I(~TEFi~ f~'L.
NASH" P (iN DR [\1\1
5417 1ST I~~'<,/r:: N
ST PETERSBURG FL
::) ::; ""/.1 () 8 (:1 CJ :~;
::5~:;7:55 2:45::;
PANOUTSAKOS. JOHN
PANOUTSAKOS. EVANGEL.IA A
1016 N FT HAPRISON AVE
CL.E~Ar~~I,,!(~ T EF,~ fCL
33755 ;'5017
Ht.Je01HES. (I.)ESLEY F'
HUGHES. MICHELLE R
1011 N OSCEOLA AVE
C L E: ('I f--< 11") (~I T [: F<~ F l~.
~5~)-1 ':1.5 3()~..1
PANOUTSAKOS. EVANGELIA
1016 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CL"Er-'iF<(n)(-), TEF~ FL.
:3~5'?E>5 3C)1..'?
PANOUTSAKOS. EVANGELIA
1105 N OSCEOLA AVE
CL.E(~Rl")I'~ T'EFi: FL
~5:~;7,:,.5 :3t)43
ADRAGNA, BERNARD
ADRAGNA. BERNIECE M
1905 HIL.L DF.:
PP,U'i H(~h:BOF: FL.
:::;46~:~3 6e:-:22
THOMAS-WEIBLE. DEBPA A
1006 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CL.Enh~\',)r:~ TER F~L_
:~) ~~; 7' .51 S. Z; Cl,l'?
:.1~1~1:~: ~ S~W~:': ::,BL ~::" ~ ~[J~~(~~ ('I
J.uu , r /- Jh:,f.'IHh: 1 ~:::uN ~~\I'E:
CL"E -- {i E: 'L.
3~37..:;(......( 31:).1'7
TH01"'i~('i<.::""'W~::1 L=" DEF3RA
1()06' t. : )F' .. f~IPr:~ 1 SON
CL.E(-~.I,!. :::~ ~;:L.
:5 ::; ~7 .51 .,il ~~~ () 1. '7
I~
{~VE
BAUER" BRI,JCt::
B(~IUF:R. f'!C)[~:UE
1000 N FT HARPISON
Cl~.EI'~h:/,.I)P1T[R FL.
I~~VC t.jl
:S37.~).:1 3()J.6
V,!OI~F'r-':'" BE.i'~,J,~r"iIN
(S!') YI~~IF-<: 3T
F< () f'i (-~ T '" n (-~ 1',1
~I ::;F\:(.~IEL.
I:::Rn~CH. JOHN h
FRENCH. SANDRA L.
1300 r"i(-'i I N ST
DUHED I f'1 P:L.
~~54t;,98 ~:S1239
e
Cl_EARI;')(l TEh~ : I TV OF'
F::JO E~: 0 >< ,~'" ,-,8
CL.[(1~'7 iTER F:'L
CLEARWATER. r' V OF
PO E~O)< 4/" ,_,
SEVMOUR, JAMES E SR
SEVMOUR. PEARLIE
807 N JEFFERSON AVE
CL_E{",F~(,\,1{:1 TEF\~ F:'L
32;.~l5S t;.t~5J~~3
MC LEOD, RODRIGUES
446 E Li;~K.E DR
TARPON SPRINGS FL
:3 if l~;' ~3 ') 8 t~;. ;? '}'
SPINA, JAMES A II
SPINA. MAELIEN VUEN
::;;1.3 EL,DF;: I DGE ST
CL_ E:(lF~~\,1(i TE:r~ FL,
3~;755 3804
KIRSCHENBAUM, THERESA
3J,7 ELDRIDGE ST
CL,Er;~Hv.JI':'ITEH FL_
~~~3'?5SI :38()4
CASTELLANO, JACINTO
BETES, EL"E~J,{:I
906 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLE(~,H',n)(~TE:R FL,
3~) 7' .~:;51 3().:~;8
1'11~~IPT IN, SUS{)I'J. 1"1
714 N FOHT HARHISON AVE
CL.E:I''iF,~iAl(lTE:R FeL
2~2r7 5,5 :)8~?:2:
HAMPTON, BESSIE L
SH{:II,nJ, GAF<Y :"
60,1;:, NICHOLS:Ot',! ST
CL.E(lf:;:~\)(~ITE:r~ FL
~;:3;75t5 :)()~3.S
h~HOi~E" 1"iAF~Y L,
ell N G{:IRDE~'J, (-~VE
CL"EAF1ll,){~ TE:F< FL,
:~~ ~3; 7" .5 E. ~~ 0 :2 :3
C L.E I'm I~ S, M IS) h~ Y
ISL_(4ND" E:C1ITH
8(;t5 N (~('lh~DCt',! ,~'iVC
CL.E(~F<I^IATEF\~ FL,
~~;3 '"l E~~~l 3r.)~23
/
-
CLEARWATER. r, TY OF
PO BO)( 47" oj
CL.E:(~R(I. 'Ef~ FL_
ElUF.~QE;3S, (lH LL, I E: P
BURGESS. VEHNICE
1004 N GARDCN AVE:
CLE(lr~II\)(>ITEF: FL
::;3755 302(,
LUMPKIN, LE:VERTIS L
L,U~'iP~\ 1 ~,!. 1._0h~(-~ {.:~
1000 N GARDCN AVE
C L_ E (::, f:;: I,nJ (~Ir E h~ F L,
~~; ~) ~7 .S..5 2S 0 :? 61
AIR DISTHIBUTORS INC
1139 ELDRIDGE ST
CLE:f-'iRv.,1{'ITEP FL
~53;755 4310
RAGUIDEAU. MAURICETTE
:315 r.:::L, OF< J DGE:' ST
CLEAF1v.JI'HE:R FL
~3375,~, ~-)804
~~ ;eN~ L~ :~(4fllJ:~ :~, B L: elF
;~:; . ~ I;~' 0 "i. ,L'~,,;,
3<5 J' J :,~, 42
PUr] I i'J.~?: '1"
'I ~~\iE
BRUWER. JENNIFE:R A
705 N OSCEOLA AVE
CL_E(~RV,,1A n::~Fi: Fl_
337.5.:) 3f~c+:5
GHEE:H, SYL.VII''i H
531 BROXBURN AVE
H~fl'1 P r:~ FL.
::; :~3 c~ .1, "1 'l ~3 :;: ;:~
C08B" LEOU~ D
809 N GARDEN AVE
CL_E:I''iF\~ \I,) f-'i TEF1 FL.,
337E,S :302::~;
EICHNER, CHARLES P
EICHNEH. RICKI I
5113 66TH :'31 H
P(~ILr'i H(~IHE:or:;: FL.
::).(t68~~ 4,S()1
WHITNEY, DORIS A
4566 ROUND TOP DH
L,O~~~ 1''it'~GE:L.CS Cf-i
900(SI:O,; 49:30
-
e
FL.OYD" THOt"'iAS
FLOYD. ELIZABETH 0
1411 Fr~IF?110r,!T ST
Cl_[:(4F?I/\.lATE~~ FL.
Itll I LCHEF~, HI Cf<.S
1640 PALMWOOD DR
CLEi-'.)m'JATER FL.
:~; ~:' '7 .5, (~) 3 I~S }' ~~
3~)75'::1 27E.3
INC
HOF~3EY, t~I(4 TTHEVJ
809 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLE~;F:~VhHER FL.
::,; ~5 '7.:;1 .~S 3 () 1. 2
CALLAN, JAMES M JR
807 N FORT HARRISON AVE
C~ L" F~A Fllt,.I (~T E F~ FL.
:3Z;7'.:~~5 3(:t1.2
SCI FUNERAL 3ERV FLA INC
C,/O e;:iL I ~'~(4 ,ff, ~(EMENT cm:;:p
PROP:~ .." -I,( TI~- ' DCf,')T
PO.:' ~ ...:._~)0._)4t~
HOUSTO~'j TX:
801 N FORT HARRISON INC
647 E DANIA BEACH BLVD
[)(4NI~; F'L"
" \' . ~... ,J.., / \.,~ ......... ....'"t C,:'
Ki-;
3:5()()(4 :?~()1.8
,5,0
CL
:5S,:)-l
f<,(4UTl" STEPHEr,!
504 SE:~'iJNOLE S~T
CL_E{:'iRlIJ{i TE:F? FL.
::5::S '7 .5''::1 :?~ 8.S .1.
R IOS" Ct'tROL. t1
507 NICHOLSON AVE
CL_E r.'.) Rl^.I,'; TER FL
3:57'.:.~.5 ~5():33
GOlb;RD, FMNDY'
(~OZZI~r~:D, ::rUDEE
3100 GULF BLVD # 111
BELLEAIR BEACH FL
;:;25'186, 3648
OLIVIERI. ANNA A
FIGUEROA. ANTONIA
:511 ~~;PR I r~G1 C:T
CL_Et\r:;:V,!p, TEFi~ Fl_
:33'1.55 :5055
V~ORDIE, G(4YL_E J
C;O SNOW, SCOTT & KATHLEEN
:53:5() F I SHEP RD
CL.Et\f:;:I/I)P,TER FL,
:':;:376:5 0905
HAL.L_, f<Ei'~I',,!ETH V~
Hr~L.L, L H~DI0j GI
30:'3 SPF<.Ir,m (::::T
CL_EI~~Rlp){:'ITER F'L
:3;;)~l55 3(),::,~)
LOPEl. HORTENCE A
(')LE><PI~'J.[)Er.:;:, riEF~RY
::;09 SPP:r ~'Kl CT
CL_E:(')P~\)(.l T EF? I:::L
:::;:5755 3055
ALEXANDER. MERRY
LOPEZ, HORTENCE A
:305 SPFi: I r~Cj CT
C L_ E: t~ F,~ ('I,I?\ T E: R FL..
33755 3055
PUGO-CAIPO HOLDINGS INC
198 I,,)EST B(4Y ()F~
L(4F<:GO FLo
:~~; ~) )' "7 () ;~; ~3 6. 2
HOLD I HaS IrK:
MC DANIEL, BPIDGET R
603 ~3 CED(~R 3T
C;LE(,;RI,I~ATE::P r;L
3::5755 3010
Vi-'.)LL. I EF<ES, r-i(~lF~C
BARTELL. ROBERT H
214 S HIGHLAND AVE
CL,Et'IF;~I,~P,Tr:::R FL_
~:5 ~5 7" 5 ,:~I 6 ;~; :2 1.
D(~V IS, AI~.L I E t'11~E:
91.1 i"! l?i (:1 F:D E i',j (~VE
CL_E(,;nVJ I~)I TEh~ FL..
:537 ,::1 E) :5 () 2: .~=)
BRIGlHT. WILLIAM E
BRIGHT, PARTHENIA A
909 N GARDEN AVE
CL.,E('IRI"J(~)TER FL.
~537 55 ~5Cl:2':;1
3t"iAF~T" C{iL.VI~..!
::::; t.'i (;:, F~ T" J 1...1 I~'I I'..! IT (~
907 r',1 GI';f~DEt,J, {i'v'E
CLE:(4RI",1~';,ITER FL.
MOURA, ANTHONY A
905 N G1ARDEN AVE
C L, E: (,'.) R W (4 T [' f~,~ I~: Lo.
~; 2) 7.S.5 ($ () :2:.S
3 ~:; 'V/ EI 5 ;:; () :2 E,
e
e
LEE, ELLA D EST
C/O lEE, MINNIE
600 NICHOLSON ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3034
NELSON, LILLIE R
WILSON, SARMELLA
604 NICHOLSON ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3034
MC GILL, VIOLENE
DANIEL, DEMERRIS
608 NICHOLSON ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3034
STONEHOUSE, JOHN L
606 NICHOLSON ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3034
CRUDER, LORETTA Y
904 BLANCHE B LITTLEJOHN T
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3851
BLUNT, JACQUELINE
605 CEDAR ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3010
SPENCE DESIGNS INC
913 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL
3375.5 3015
AVE
IRANMANESH. MALI
9311 HAMPSHIRE PARK DR
TAMPA FL
NEYREY FINANCIAL GROUP INC
853 MAIN ST
33647 2532
SAFETY HARBOR FL
34695, 355,6
NEYREY. RENE J
NEYREY, DARLENE B
2898 REGENCY CT
CLEARWATER FL
33759 1431
B
33759 1431
THORNTON. JAMES J TRE
1124 DREW ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 4817
HARN. ROBERT B
1254 FRANKLIN ST
CLEARWATER FL
33756 581..4
CLAYTON. ROBERT F
PO BOX 5213
LARGO FL
33'779 5213
HUELSTER. JAMES F
3766 8ENSON AVE N
ST PETERSBURG FL
33713 3458
TRUE BLUE PRODUCTIONS
2600 A8ERDEEN AVE
LOS ANGELES CA
90027 1222
WARE, JOHN M
303 PALM BLUFF ST
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3048
DR
ST
ANU INDUSTRIES INC
8123 RIVER COUNTRY DR
SPRING HILL FL
346(:)7 2132
8ERRY'~ MIC~~AEl_ C SR
BERRY. PAULA M
30 ARBOR LN
OLDSMAR FL
3467'7 2001
BERRY. MICHAEL C SR
8ERRY, PAULA M
POBOX 1196
CLEARWATER FL
33757 1196
=VANGELIA
AVE
e
e
CARILLON RUG CLEANERS INC
1107 N FORT HARRISON AVE
:?~ :::) ",? 5 E'1 :::) t)~? .1.
CLEARWATER FREE CLINIC TNC
707 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLE~r;R\I..I{'1 TEf:~ FL
CLEAR\"'ATER FL
;3 ::5 '7 .~;l .:s :3 f~ ~2 ~5
TAGARAS. GEORGE V
1801 LAURENCE CT
Cl._EAFi~\I.!r; TEF;~ Fl.,.
Z; :3; '/' I~::~ ~1 6, (;. E; :2
HOClf<S" FWN{.'{L.D
704 GFi~(~~~'~T 3T
CL_.EI~~RI;J{;~T!:R FL.
:3::5 "7' .5.5 :? .S. (S 2:;
HOOI-(:3, RONr-;L_D
1759 FULTC)r',] (~~VE
CL,E A f:<' \.! {'I TE:r,~ FL
:~)~;~/5,5 If32:CI
FREE: Cl._INIC INC
" ". ~~R 1 ~)m,! AVE
JIMMIE, HOWARD R
609 SEM I ~']OLE ST
CL,E:r;f~~Wr-; TE~F,~ FL_
:~~; 2~ "l.S. .~s :) 8 61 .5::,
J HiM n::., HOI;J{iFW F~
'c'v:;) ~. E....J.,;J~~- ~'
Q ,'.' ,., .1. ". ..)
CLEA I i 'E'. ~,
....
3 :5 '7 5~~ .5. <S ~~ l~~;' 5,
.n Ml'lI E, Hm"'r~F?D R
60':1 ~:;J ..~,~.- S;T
". ,~."~,'\ ,~~') ~l
~~ l;~;~: ,:'.. J ,~I o~. ~;: F._
',..)',,) I ....... __.I ...Jl...J(..I.....,
(Z~M : ~ {.ee.Q 'i4 ~ tk vYlLs ~
- ~ (j)e... ~ a. (t tk y ~ it-. ~/".. ~.
OLD CLEARWATER BAY &~;:
Neighborhood Association Ok -rl.. ,-^
P.O. Box 2133 Clearwater 34617 . l) (1\...oV-' .
~~.
December ih 2000
Clearwater Development Board
I'd
112 South Osceola Street, 3 Floor
Clearwater, FlO1ida 33756
Dear Board Members:
On December 6th, 2000 the board of directors for the Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood
Association met with Don Harrill, a representative for the group under contract to
purchase the Marina property located at 880,900, and 908 North Osceola Avenue, to
discuss their proposed development proj ect
Don provided us with a detailed presentation about their intentions for the use of the
propeliy. After a review of the site plan and the city staff report, for the proposed
redevelopment, we agreed to support their project as it was presented to us with
stipulations that the surrounding residents would be provided adequate landscaping and
other amenities to preserve their privacy and minimize noise.
Consequently, we the Board of Directors for the Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood
Association support case FL 00-10-46, Agenda Item D9, to be heard at the CDB meeting
scheduled for December 12,2000 in conjunction with the propeliy's proposed use of
attached dwellings, office, restaurant, retail and boat slips as presented by Don Harrill.
Sincerely
Jeffrey McKilmey
President - Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association
Cc: Don Harrill
Ralph Stone
OCBNA Board of Directors
~ ME'.
fl. ~'-
- '
-,,9 ~ !
rc If'
: ? l}} - !'
\ -.I
, '
t-l ;'
, ( ~~
/: \.::~i
,
--
e
OLD CLEARWATER BAY
Neighborhood Association
P.o. Box 2133 Clearwater 34617
December ih 2000
Clearwater Development Board
I'd
112 South Osceola Street, 3 Floor
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Dear Board Members:
On December 6t\ 2000 the board of directors for the Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood
Association met with Don Harrill, a representative for the group under contract to
purchase the Marina property located at 880, 900, and 908 North Osceola Avenue, to
discuss their proposed development proj ect
Don provided us with a detailed presentation about their intentions for the use of the
property. After a review of the site plan and the city staff report, for the proposed
redevelopment, we agreed to support their project as it was presented to us with
stipulations that the surrounding residents would be provided adequate landscaping and
other amenities to preserve their privacy and minimize noise.
Consequently, we the Board of Directors for the Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood
Association support case FL 00-10-46, Agenda Item D9, to be heard at the CDB meeting
scheduled for December 12,2000 in conjunction with the property's proposed use of
attached dwellings, office, restaurant, retail and boat slips as presented by Don Harrill.
Sincerely
Jeffrey McKinney
President - Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association
Cc: Don Harrill
Ralph Stone
OCBNA Board of Directors
fJLI
?0J1l . 16 y~
St:Nl BY: F'IGURSKI&hARRILl_;
727 9443711;
DEC-12-00 9:53j
PAGE 1
-- e
FIGURSKI & HARRILL-
THE HOLIDAY TOWER, SUITE 350
2435 U. S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH
HOLIDAY? FLORIDA 34691
To: AMY RUSCHER
Company: CITY OF CLEARWA TER
Fax Number: (727) 562-4865
Business Phone: (727) 562-4579
~ [E -@ [E .0 m [E m'
w DEe 1 2 2000 W
By -/t7 ~
From: J. BEN HARRILL
Fax Number. (727) 944~3711
Business Phone: (727) 942-0733
Pages: 5! INCLUDING COVER
D8teflime: 12/12/00 8:30 AM.
Subject: CLEARWA TER BA Y MARINA
MESSAGE: ATTACHED PLEASE FIND THE ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO THE SITE
PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CLEARWA TER SA Y MARINA.
THESE ARE THE CONDITIONS WE WORKED OUT WITH
EO ARMSTRONG, WHO IS REPRESENTING VICKI
MORGAN. PLEASE CALL WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
CONFiDENTIAL
WARNING- THIS TRANSMISSION MA Y CONTAIN CERTAIN
fNFORMA nON WHICH IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL
IF you. ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS
TRANSMISSION AND RECEIVED IT IN ERROR, PLEASE
CONTACT THE SENDER IDENTiFIED ABOVE FOR
FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS.
DISTRIBUTION LIST:
1. ED ARMSTRONG, ESQ.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FAX NUMBER
441-8617
SENT
DE~ i~ 00 ~'~j' PAGE 4/4
727 944:3711 . v- L- 8.",
8'1: FIGIJA8KI&HAARILL; '+1274411617 NOI p.Din, F-m
W"'.U~_.~.,u,pm _HN>UII'~LAK"Y 'Jij' _If ! e~0}
,., i' ~. ~NqY: I ~/
: 'l " t. DSCAPI ' I
_._._~.._~~'"..cI,.~ . a.If.." ~Mf" n U710. n~-;7HI~.. Fn Il~'5a.".04
S.b"'ltt To' -'.. '-~-7h-'-~ .----.,-~~-_ ::-'7~
. ~F. ~.,: n__ . nQ': fi~/-,- /f~,C:;- ,1l~.:->~0~?J .)
I~:M.. . Ii,,,,., : ,-; 'I
n 'PCnd., ; ~-"--;-'-----_. Lot_II.. ;a. ~_~_ '
' " ' : .:::'"/,.~- . ..~:
~oI, 2fT4Q' .
.~- --- ~- "-
~(t1~~:i2:lf~~q I ........ ;~.I
~..~q,'''~r@e~; J%'
~~'~"I& 3:. i ..va
UJ !fIl.hLQ~,,.-- ,I ;i AA;,' .
j. .. .~3:?-
I ~dIt"3K. :tio --,' ,
u.o J. 'J /9.(I'(),-
i~ --
I 83W_
. I,'.., \
! .
..d, lllIi t'oUow,": l
,. COIn Dr k1CiI CMdt UPOn ....optA"'. """111.1,.1'"<;0 00 ~tllYory or ~bc""
~ """II!-~'~~
~II rn Ie .1 i. I"""nlt.. 10' 90 d... to be lO 'P~f''', ^II "'.rk ~ be
rompl I In t w<lrlrtn"nko m.nn""'.""'dlna 10 "~ndl(d ~"'"C<', .ny
.1~li 0 Of devJtli"" (!l>"n Ibo"r ;r*~(c;llorlllnIil!iVinl .Jdi. toll< wlil
1>0,_ " o"lY.Pun wri'ItIlQ/derI, lna will """"'un "". t."it om
.nd . I~ elllm.,..
/l4'horl.od,
5,.n,!ufI! ;
~..._......------
.t ~("l*O1 . Tho .~. p'lctI. lpeCilk:.1Io(}$ -ild <ondl~oni
"" II 1'(.l'\d.re """'Y ,,,,,.ftd. Yo..r<> 'Ulh~~..d l<) do ,h. WDrl<
" ,~u 'In d. ~'\'MOI will t>o m,d. ., Dulll~ 'lIO...,
N\llO: Thi. ~'Plllllll m.y \>o'
w!Ikdn.." by U' if /)Ol.e~l wl,hln
. i
I
;:IS~"~~__..,__. -1-..
.~~o.~; I
.1
.._--~
i
!
.. ..-..~. .-----.". ',..
m ~m~:; ~Di~ wi
1 1
I ,) ~
!~-~~~~- .'
SEI~T BY: FIOURSKI&hARR ILL;
.
FIGURSKI & HARRILL
727 9443711;
DEC-12-.9:53,;
PAGE 1
THE HOLIDAY TOWER, SUITE 350
2435 U. S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH
HOLIDAY, FLORIDA 34691
To: AMY RUSCHER
Company: CITY OF CLEARWA TER
Fax Number: (727) 562-4865
Business Phone: (727) 562-4579
.-
~~j@~~~~W
/
BY~ 00 -;1;7-t
From: J. BEN HARRILL
Fax Number: (727) 944.3711
Busines~ Phone: (727) 942-0733
Pages; 5, INCLUDING COVER
Dateflime: 12/12/00 8;30 AM.
Subject: CLEARWA TER BA Y MARINA
MESSAGE: ATTACHED PLEASE FIND THE ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO THE SITE
PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CLEARWA TER SA Y MARINA.
THESE ARE THE CONDIT/ONS WE WORKED OUT WITH
ED ARMSTRONG, WHO IS REPRESENTING VICKI
MORGAN. PLEASE CALL WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
CONFiDENTIAL
WARNING- THfS TRANSMISSION MA Y CONTAIN CERTAIN
INFORMA nON WHICH IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL
fF you. ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS
TRANSMISSION AND RECEIVED IT IN ERROR, PLEASE
CONTACT THE SENDER IDENTIFIED ABOVE FOR
FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS.
DISTRIBUTION LIST:
1. ED ARMSTRONG. ESQ.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FAX NUMBER
441.8617
imlT BV' FIGIIRSKI&HMRILa
';-."..i~_,~.:u"m ~r..UII'~LA~HY
n7 944371 i ;
D~C-1 ~-ao
.. j
I
I
I
"fic';i.~" 1'01 t;,:"".' J II'
D'r .f> ?RtA1,'~ ,J. I
~d, Ii foll<>,.I:, I ' ,
~ .uh 0' loci I cll," "POn """pIOn,. .,,,,11\1.. b'IIn~~O~~~_ ~.~~...:...,._.."..~~,.,;___)
1I.'no,I... cZ)~.Jd?v."'" \
5i~",,"(. : r-:::.!O-F ~._~~..~
N\!1e; r~il ~"il""j mlY"" J
"'lnOm." by 4Ifr"~ leCtpj.~ wlln:" ~_ dl~',
.. i
!
I
..."... ~'_-...,-_.-+.,
~Il".tu..~
,\11 n> to ,I ;, 1""'~IO" i.r ~ d,l" to be u IP~fi... All ",ork III btl
rnrnpl I In. _.nll.. m'"""'<COI~IOlllo ,\Olno"o p/~'""'.. ~ny
.,.... o~ or dl~j;li'" (ra.'n Ibo". Ir>t<HrClIJIIl1I inl1!i"inJ liffll <<l'~ wli!
be,. " ....!y .pO" wrill./)wo.,l. '00 will b'''m..~ "It. 'h,,~. .""
"dI Ihe .II/m"..
A~ ., PI"f'l'W! .. Tho 'Qovl Wi.... IPlejli<:.1!or~ lifd ('ndl~.n;
.... I. ry onet ..., ..,.oy I(U~ftd. Ye. ... '"lhliri..d C<l do th. wo",
:;f :;;' .,,, .m=::.."'~~.___ ...
..----~ 1)
l
:
~ ~ @ ~..~ ill [E ~
'UU' ' ~...... ~
I
By J
Harrill, Page 3
880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue - Development Order
January 2, 2001
e
e
140 UNITS
210 PARKING SPACES
12 STORIES OVER PARKING
2.8 ACRE :l::SITE
.<;~"i
.. <-~;:- <.'
...........:::..
::". ."",,:..::- .o,.~:::::.
SLIP AREA TO BE RENOVATED
(FOR USE OF CONDOMINIUM AREA)
(17 SLIPS)
Exhibit A
Harrill, Page 4
880,900 and 908 North Osceola Avenue - Development Order
January 2, 200 I
.
e
. .
....:..~-
. 0 .' ...
1fL MWI!~.ilJ5 3
/~)#SAi3i61IrJl~ t?-ii!ci ..... . "ljf8~~' .
".. ,"
._ _. .. . . _ -;_: ~....__.h_,
. .
5"~D
of-~~ 1f.!ci .
. .' Jtlb.iehW. ~1CGvd; . . .'
""2;';' ./""1;..,.,........":517..
c;I.J I '-t:/J.JI(l'. I .
c.~M~.fL .
.:..__....~. ."
'. 1/. .': I
1~/O .. .'~
'~~Al"
sm'~~ .'~~:.:' .
Mrcu . _.._.~_. .
. .
.. ._- ..- ........ -- ,"... .... "." "-,' -. - - - ....
Exhibit B
St:I~l BY: FIGURSKI&hARR I Ll_;
727 9443711;
DEC-12-00 9:53;
PAGE 1
. .
FIGURSKI & HARRILL
THE HOLIDAY TOWER, SUITE 350
2435 U. S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH
HOLIDAY, FLORIDA 34691
To: AMY RUSCHER
Company: CITY OF CLEARWA TER
Fax Number: (727) 562~4865
Business Phone: (727) 582-4579
fD) ~ m; ~ 0 III ~ I-~I"
W DEe 12 ZOOo W
BY-Lt -d, ~
From: J. BEN HARRILL
Fax Number. (727) 944-3711
Business Phone: (727) 942-0733
Pages: 5} INCLUDING COVER
Dateflime: 12/12/00 8:30 AM.
Subject: CLEARWA TER SA Y MARINA
MESSAGE: ATTACHED PLEASE FIND THE ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS PROPOSED TO BE ADDED TO THE SITE
PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CLEARWA TER SA Y MARINA.
THESE ARE THE CONDITIONS WE WORKED OUT WITH
EO ARMSTRONG, WHO IS REPRESENTING VICKI
MORGAN. PLEASE CALL WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
CONFiDENTIAL
WARNJNG- THfS TRANSMISSiON MA Y CONTAIN CERTAIN
fNFORMA TION WHICH IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL.
IF YOu. ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS
TRANSMISSION AND RECEIVED IT IN ERROR, PLEASE
CONTACT THE SENDER IDENTIFIED ABOVE FOR
FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS.
DISTRIBUTION LIST:
1. ED ARMSTRONG, ESQ.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FAX NUMBER
441.8617
~ . DEC-12-00 Q:5i; PME 414
SFNT ", "'UR<"'HARRIlL; m MAR, 11 , 'f"''' "" ,.,,, P Olm ",OJ ~
I.{-"l.y;->~~:u,pm ~..H~.UIt,~""~.,y 6 ~~ f i _~/ ~
- i'~, ' ~Nqr, I 171~//
: ""L. OSCAPI " I ~.
--- -~.._~!:.:~'~~ ~"~Mfl, Il 1mo . m-;~HI~6 . fn 1.t.566'.0D4
'":'~.~ ~- :- f~/. It#;-Oi'-;~II
~, .- d ' '4L~,-...____ ta ~ ,
" p..Q e, , r,) r;j) ; '.'tl/.. ., , . ~__.~:--------;_ .
' . ~ ~. . !$~" .,:- I
'= .:-;-~~ - "-'---- ~
. -I .... .~o~ :j
) . ~5.l{,~ I
I $.'
,I
..1 4~
I ..vo.
I
J I tlsO
i
I .,,~~~
I ~dIt '3,iC ;;).10 _. .
;~ /9:~,- I
! 1.83W,~ j
r
;.
1"
I
I
, . .
I f., nl ~Q' ..loIl<>w\: ,"
~, Ti~M, .~_~~::::il,~~'* ~~~~~",. b.I':::~,,:~~~
( ~II rn to .1 j. sua"M'.. 10, 90 d.,. '" 0. l' IP~fi... 1111 work \Q bII' .
rompl I ,. j W<iIl<m.nffke mtnnet'..C<l,dIOi 10 "on.". pt~.'iCtl. Artv . '
.Ilf'l" or davllli"'" (fDIn ~bovr j~~ICf.tJOIIlln~"inr a~l ..ot< IoIli1 ;,ulhorl.od.
""!" " ""1~.~.nw'I'ItIlWderI, lnaw,lI b''''''u~''Ir. thirijeovr, lilln.I""';
.n a I/ll! ..lIm"t.
,
Clflt'l",~', for l~. J~II\ of: ..i
.,! 'f> f1Bd/l,tf' i
. .1' lr - --;a.L- . ...1. I
-'-i~.~,'"':",~-,~,~
.!~.
-............--.-.,-
Acp .f ~'''l'tN1 . Tho ~bo\Ii ~11.t1, lll4tili<:a'llor"lS .ifd (o"di~oni
"* Ii I'f aM Alii horeby .""pft<j. Yo" lre '"Ih~ri..d (<> do lh. wo",
" ,po 'I~ <I. ~.l'Mrtl will bf "'ad. " O"III~ .1I6....,
O"'(l A i'*pll''II:Bl
NQ!O: Thi. ~'Ojl\l..1 moy""
W1lktiralm by ijJ If "Oll'~. "'IIhln
I
I
lI5n"u,,~ 'j
"'''''' ..--.,..-----t-..
_da~_,
I
._--~
i
:
r-"'---~~Ii ~l
l~ ~ @ ~ 0 ill ~ : ~ I
Ii c' " '"'", I I
1,',u~l c,'.'l,::-'"! ii Ge) 2uUu l~ I
, L11~ LJ "c. ,G L.J I
I I
- l
I I
!8y J
~~NT BV: FIrJASKI&HAARIL.L:
::r::;o-'
fT1
en 3: 3::
0)> , ,
Z<~, '
tT]ITIZ
~OfTl
ro~~
~O~
~ (J)
I '
; i
7279443711; DEC.12-00
~~:. l !
;
, ;
,
I:
~~,~
,-...
"
OU)
::Oc
CIJ
(/)>
fT1:::u
! ,-... o)! t;
: ..... '1 ,::
'-....l -i'
; OO:!
, (f) 0"
: rZCO Ii
!=oOMH
(/) 0 :;
'--" s: :::0 !,
- fT1 !!
ZZ'
COi!
~<'
~
):>om
::00
~
'-'
I
,
!l
I :
I
A
~:.
\)j
X
(/)~
t0cjo
~C2 U ~-&
)>rr1)>
O(/);:O
:;C 2S
mOz C
H-rA G) z
Ai (j'J _
(j) v -0 -t
=1 J> )>0 U)
fTl;:o
zsQ
z
o
" ,'"
PM1E 2/4
/WfECfFiIfW rE:1~)i
/By___ !
---==-,-1
SEI,iT 3'1: FIGURSKI&HAPRILL;
,1::0HO 11:011'1i F~.CUml'I'
7~7 9443711 i
jll
, ,~~,
~,,'
'''-...
\\'
~
....
i:' , I'..
"
h ." l
Iii. ~. .
~. .
" ".
~~
PME 314
HOI
R_
. ).
I
I
!
trs-
5~
'r-!'
, .
~
:~
-...;;.. .
~. .'
.,,~.
t
" ,:
~'!
IEXHI81T
'~L
Ir0 ~ @ ~ O\l! [g ~1
l~ "', ~
By
12-08-00
12:03pm
:JiiANQVh~441. I T-506 :;:~~
I 11\) LANDSCAPIN~f i I!':.
__"___,_~~eh~:~~~,~:,Rd~__~r ~Iuf(" FL 33770 · (2i'.59~'6746 . Fax nr-586-2604
To . ~ ~'" Ph'"":;tP/=/~~-D";'-iq~, ._
g;t'--~~-~~~~;a 1-: ~
~ ,,_,_. Locatlotl i$~' --~.~_._~-~
" ,- 1 ~. _=-_ _-=.; ~
From-JOHNSON ,BLAKELY
-
::-::~)l-'
~,.{k,~)iIi>~l21i!fQ ~
#~~~l~ mi~ I
~',-_.UW-., . (9 :ii..
,'Md n;~"c~,,~!~::: "_" ",
......--. -. ------.,.. .
I
J.
I
-... I'
~~
~20
,.I
,
.1.1/ t(D
! .2/0'
1 I' '~ tLsO , '
f J.,
t" .. ....~~~
i~c-n3k.;VO ,
,,_(12 J. './ /9rm.,-
. :~ =- -----
1 18 3Vt?,~
I
I
i
'f
!
I
I
I
f
i.
!
"
I 'if'",;o;" fo, 1',"m of' >I - 4'
I ' 0 lar ($ - J? 3,~--L.
"
faym nt I, I
_ T'!M ~o/:':~:"~",."'"""" ""P:~~'~~~:~; b""::.:',",~,~ _ _~-!_=__,_~..:___"~_ _ _ _
( All rn Ie al i~ guaranteed for 90 day' 10 be 1I~ spe~flect, All wQr~ to be '~?JJ
compl l In a workmanlike manner;accordlng IQ >toindard practiceG. Any . '
'\Il~ra Oil or dell/alion (rom above specifications Invqlvin$ e~lril CQSU will AlJlhOrll:Cd:,', : cv.
be (lx 11 d only upon written order~1 and will beC1)m~ an eKtr'~ ch~rlle over Signalufe ~ . _ _
i\n~ a v the e'lJmaJe,
. Note; This pfOf)o'll may ~' ~
Ac~e n C! 01 Ptop0i41 - The abolle prices, specifica"llon5 a~'d cpnctltlon~ withdrawn by us If npt acceple wllhln
ar~ sa ,r tory and are hereby accepted. You are aUlh6ri:led to do the work
., 5f1!: -in d. payment will bo made u ou[II/\~ abovl!, ';
,
j,
~ d~y~,
... .........,_.__., n ~ . '." ... ."
Slgnatur~ .
"''''--...-.--....,
~ j"
---.... --"'--"'----.....--
. 1,_- _.__ _._...~. .. .'.
~:
.~
-
e
CLEARW A TER BAY MARINA
Additional Conditions to Address Concerns of Adjoining Owners
1. The balconies and views of the northernmost bank of the condominium
units will be oriented to the northwest, and the building line of the
condominium adjacent to the residential properties to the north shall extend
no further east than what is generally shown on the sketch attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
2. No air conditioners or other mechanical equipment shall be located along
the northern and eastern property lines of the subject property with a
preference to placing all such equipment on the roof.
3. There shall ne no outdoor live music or outdoor speakers at the proposed
restaurant on the property.
4.At such time as the applicant obtains a building permit for the proposed
condominium building, the applicant shall install landscaping on the
Morgans' property generally consistent with the landscaping plan attached
hereto as Exhibit B. The Morgans will be responsible for the maintenance of
the landscaping installed upon their property.
5. In exchange for the applicant's agreement to the above conditions the
l\lorgans represent that they have no objection to the applicant's plan and are
not concerned about the ultimate number of units or ultimate height of the
condominium building on the subject property, provided the height does not
exceed one hundred fifty feet (150').