FL01-01-25
Nonhlide
" '.~)(,;(~,;:~ ~', [ }
.
, .
.
.
.
February 11, 2003
Mr. Mark Parry
Mr. Frank Gerlock
City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services
100 South MYlile Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Reference: Osceola Bay Residence Tower
304 North Osceola Avenue
FL 01-06-25
Subject: Minor Revision to Level Two Approved Plan
Dear Mr. Parry and Mr. Gerlock:
At the meeting of February 4, 2003, we discussed the proposed minor revisions to
the approved plan for this project. You asked that we provide data that verifies we meet the
requirements of Section 4-406A Minor Revisions. We are transmitting herewith the following:
1 each
Approved Plan showing building setbacks and green/landscaping
areas.
Proposed Plan showing proposed building setbacks and proposed
green/landscaping areas.
Approved landscape plan
Color Renderings (3 views)
1 each
1 each
1 each
Regarding Section 4-406, Point 4, the proposed setbacks have not been reduced
from the approved plan. The green/landscaping areas in the proposed plan have been increased
slightly, by approximately 300 s.f., over the approved plan.
The other points in the section do not apply to this request: the location of the
building has not substantially changed; the height ofthe building has not increased above the
approved 150 feet.
Please consider these revisions minor, and approve our proceeding with the
building and site submittals to the Building Department for permits.
Thank you for your attention to this review and approval.
Sin~er ly,
N " .. HSIDE ENGINEE
1/ ~-ff../J. l ,. II
::7" /7 :/" ,#
;>1U0Cv~ hi ,
Ii enneth H. Rou~1~.E.
SERVICES, INC.
,1/
/Z,{
KHR:ag
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
~
I
I
I
I
I
-I -
I
I
I
I
-
,
I
!
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
L~~~"""
: PARKING
AREAS
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
r-
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I~
I
i
I
I
POOL AND DECK
I
i'l
@ : PARKING
GREENIIANDSCAPING
AREAS
~M~'.,~., ..~ ." m., -um~mn_'_",~_uummmm~'~_"'_~~_"WdmU~m~"_~_mu_.v__U~Y'~Ud'mU~m~Wmuu~.mu__. c..
."
.
. re.~.t
t1'l:'~ ;'.:.J I;
r-'
f";ASE #:J-C O..L~176-tS
GATE RECEIVED: &'Z/-v i
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): rlI
ATLASPAGE#: l77h
ZONING DISTRICT: 1>
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: eDh
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPE~TIES:
NORTH: J.)
SOUTH: -i
WEST: .
EAST:
~ Clearwater
iJ~
~
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLlL.,TION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
J)
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1/ LO:')>-",
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: _OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: _601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 240 CLEARWATER, FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: _727/469-8838
FAX NUMBER: _727/469-8800
PROPERTY OWNER(S): _MALCOLM CROFT, BEVERLY CROFT, BENNETT WEBER
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME: _~ ,JOfNJr. ~S
MAILING ADDRESS: _601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 240, CLEARWATER FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: _72~{) t FAX NUMBER: _727/469-8800
~
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS: _302-308 OSCEOLA AVENUE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _SEE ATTACHED
PARCEL NUMBER: _TAX ID #'S 09/29/15/53370/000/0010 AND 0020, 09/29/15/00000/430/0600
PARCEL SIZE:
_1.07 ACRES, 46,615 SQ. FT.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: 25 DWELLING UNITS
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _SECTION 2-903B.1.a. ALLOW PARCEL TO BE DEVELOPED AS ATTACHED DWELLINGS;
(include all requested code deviations; e,g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
SECTION 2-903B.1.c. INCREASE MAX HEIGHT TO 150 FEET
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO XXXX (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable document)
-
--
C. / PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
c:{ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
See attached Purchase Aqreement
D.JWRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
rtf' Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it i
located.
_ALTHOUGH THE AREA IS CHARACTERIZED WITH MODEST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MID-RISE ATTACHED DWELLINGS, THE
CITY'S VISION IN THE 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE INCLUDES A REVITALIZED, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXTENSION OF DOWN-
TOWN. THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES 25 HIGH END CONDOMINIUMS WITH AMENITIES. IT WILL HOPEFULLY ESTABLISH A POSITIVE
REDEVELOPMENT PRECEDENT FOR THE AREA.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
_THE SITE IS ZONED DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ZONING
CLASSIFICATION. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL GENERATE AND ENCOURAGE A BETTER MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND
PEDESTRIAN USES, THEREBY INCREASING THE VALUE OF ADJACENT LAND AND BUILDINGS.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS A HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY THAT WILL NOT AFFECT THE HEALTH OR SAFETY
OF PERSONS RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE AN INGRESS/EGRESS POINT OF ACCESS FROM OSCEOLA AVENUE. VEHICLE
TRIP GENERATION WILL NOT HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON AFFECTED INTERSECTIONS OR ROADWAYS, WITH NO REDUCTION
IN LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ON ANY ROADS.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH AND WILL RAISE THE STANDARDS OF THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER
OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
_THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONE BUILDING WITH VIEW CORRIDORS ON EITHER SIDE. THERE WILL BE
NQ ADVERSE EFFECTS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
J
/
iii Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards.
_THE LAND USE OF THE SITE IS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD). THE MAX HEIGHT IN THE D DISTRICT IS 150 FEET. HEIGHT
IS MEASURED FROM THE MEAN ELEVATION (14 FEET) OF EXISTING GRADE. THE SITE SLOPES STEEPLY TO CLW HARBOR WITH A
GRADE DIFFERENTIAL OF 27 FEET. THE STRUCTURE, SITE PLAN AND DESIGN ARE CONSISTENT WI INTENT OF D DISTRICT.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential intill project will not reduce
the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL STABILIZE AND LIKELY RAISE THE MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTIES IN THE AREA.
THE CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE OF THE SITE IS $447,100. WITH REDEVELOPMENT, ASSESSED VALUE PROJECTED AT $15M. _
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.
--
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
_ATTACHED DWELLINGS ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT AND 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
_ADJACENT LAND USES ARE PREDOMINANTLY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL. MANY OF THE STRUCTURES ARE MID-RISE ATTACHED
DWELLINGS. THE PROPOSED CONDO COMPLEX IS SPECIFICALLY GEARED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE VIEWS OF THE HARBOR
AND WATERFRONT. IT IS ALSO INTENDED TO AID IN THE REVITALIZATION OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise
available in the City of Clearwater.
_THIS LOCATION PROVIDES A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO REDEVELOP A PORTION OF CLEARWATER HARBOR THAT IS
CURRENTLY UNDERUTILlZED, AND IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES DESCRIBED IN THE 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development
_ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS A KEY COMPONENT TO THE SUCCESS OF THE DOWNTOWN. THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT WILL PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE CONTINUING REVITALIZATION OF DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER. THE
PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY IMPOVE THE SITE.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
_THE CITY WILL BENEFIT BY HAVING AN ATTRACTIVE BUILDING COMPLEX IN A REDEVELOPING AREA.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AESTHETICALLY IMPROVE THE IMMEDIATE AREA AND CLEARWATER AS A WHOLE.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT REFLECTS THE CITY'S VISION OF URBAN CHARACTER WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development
_SHARED PARKING IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ON-STREET PARKING OF VISITORS IS NOT REQUIRED.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use
separate sheets as necessary.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EMPHASIZES HARMONY WITHIITS SURROUNDINGS AND REFLECTS ON THE CITY'S HISTORIC
BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
"'B- COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
i
~ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
....0.. PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
B"
~
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
~
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
/
rtf/ SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
/J All dimensions;
// North arrow;
-z.. Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
./ / Location map;
z: Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
L Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
L All required setbacks;
---s. All existing and proposed points of access;
....L All required sight triangles;
..L Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 0'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
/
-4
,,-
;7
./
-~:/
~
--:;7'
j./
7
-7
/
~( /SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
~ Land area in square feet and acres;
~/ Number of dwelling units proposed;
,/ " Gross floor area devoted to each use;
7 Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
J:? Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
-=-/ Size and species of all landscape material;
~ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
V Building and structure heights
n Impermeable surface ratio (LS.R.); and
7 Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
f.O> REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering if possible;
/ +
III kOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: r. .:>>7;.;.
/. One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
-;;T Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
.:) All open space areas;
V Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
J:l Lotlines and building lines (dimensioned);
Q Streets and drives (dimensioned);
-7"" Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
_ Structural overhangs;
...lL Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 or 6 - Fiexibie Deveiopment Application Comprehensive infiii Redeveiopment Project- City or Clearwater
e
--
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
~
/'
....!.-/
./
~
=9
~
'--7
7
-71
@
@
i3-
LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering if possible);
IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
13"'/ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
!!1'/"REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
-s-. Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
.~ Reduced signage proposal (8 Y2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
'E}- Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip
generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the
Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
~~,..-......,
f') \ S. '\
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ day of
~IVE: ,AD. 20~ to me and/or by
p. ~ \\:IE Fv Co ~ ~ , who is personally known has
produced "D R, 'll:;~' > \..-\ C-\?+J 5 t. as
identification.
4b,~~~
My commission expires:
~:AQQJL
.".~", Theodore A Freed
"!~~My ?Ommission CC790586
~..~..' Exptres November 12, 2002
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
e
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
SF.F. ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives
to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (lIwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
S:\P1anning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review\comprehensive in fill application2.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infiii Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
J'~/fJ2/~~I]fJl Ocl:~:5 ~"CJ14_/:~
i e3i30/20fJl 18: ,l:' 8d-254-mH4
IW./ ILl ,..,IEPEF: iJ le:
PAUL B J()tISCl~
PUlI~E AND 8""1.11: AGR2~MDfl:
i
TRl8 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this "~ent") i$ made and
entemi ~nto ef:fective a of the latest date lIC1 forth on the sianature pqe below, (the
"Effectiv~ Dllk'~_ hy ad ~ Malcolm Croft ct Beverley Croft, and Bennet Weber .I:
Hwriet 'j,vel'flt, (cQlh,ctinly, "Sellet"), and ~Ia Bay Development, LLC. a N~
Limite<! ~j&Ollity CompMy C"PurchuerU).
I
Ih cc; n'licteration oftbe mutual covenants and repl'e3eOtations herein contained. Seller
And Pur~lwer agree u foUows:
I
I
~. PURCHASE AND SALE
I
11. ] Ptlft't- lInd ~ Subject to the terms and conditions of thls Agreement,
Seller b<<etrJ $~S to sell and ClOIlVWy to Pun:b.8cr, and Pwchaer hereby '-1 to purchue
from seller <111 of the rlgh1, title and interest in the entire following described property
(herein <1olkc.:tivdy called the "Property");
I
I
I
11.2 Land. AJllaNt (the "L4o<r) koown U 302 - 30~ North OtoeoJ. Avenue
located ~ the City of Clearwater, Florida beiDa mote partkulftdy described in the 3tta<:hed
GT ARlSSAR summary tQ this A~mmt.
11.3 EeemIlDts. AU of Seller'~ right, title tmd interest in and to all euetnent." if
any. benftittina the Laud;
11,4 B1liJ~ .1. All buiJdinga loc.ted at the IlIbd described in Section 1. 2 of thi.
A~~nt
I
ll_~ RiRhtJ ana ~~. AU rilhts and 1If'P~ pertaininv to the
t'oreao1nJ Including any riJht, title and iDtetest of Seller in any adjacent streets, alleys or
rinJ.1B-of,.wa. .
eu I -
2l. PURCHASE PIUCE
I
~.J ~ Price. The purchale price (the uPurcbue Price'') tor the Property
~halI be ,oNF MILLION FOUR HtJNDRED AND FIFTEEN THOUSAND and NOll 00
DoUan ~$1.4J 5,000.00) and shIIll ~ paid by Purchaser to Seller at the Clotlng miU<<d by
th~ sum~ ptll(' to Seller ~ S<<1ion 5.1. The Purchase Price shaH be payable at Closini
In Unit~ St<rt~ ct.trtenCy or equivalent (i.e. cuhi<<'s or official check of. ~ly ins~
financial imt11'Ution or fedmtl funds wire tranMer). AdditionlllJy, upon t'..ompJetion of the
d~~loprn("nl'ontt'Ttlplated by the rurc~, evidenca1 by &certifiea.f.~ of occupancy issued
by the city (I' ClelU'Watm". Purchuen will deliver to Stlllet;
itll del:d conveying Ftt simple title for II 6th floot., (or hi~n) ~identjAJ
/Vv@
F'/:\(;[ >);;
PN'~ e2
e
.
SECOND ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMEN'r BETWJ~EN
BENNET WEBER AND HARRJET WEBER and BEVERLEY CROFT AND MALCOLM
CROFT (COLLECTIVELY "SELLERS") AND OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC,
A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ("BUYER", "PURCHASER")
I. This Addendum is effective as of June I, 2001 and supercedes the Addendum to
Purchase and Sale Agreement executed April 6, 200 I by the Sellers and executed
AprilS, 200 I by Purchaser. The said first Addendum is void effective June 1,200 I.
2, The Parties reaffirm that the Purchase and Sale Agreement executed by Purchaser
April 3, 2001 and executed by Malcolm Croft and Beverley Croft on March 31, 200 I
and executed by Bennet Weber on April 2, 2001 and by Harriet Weber April 1 ,2001
is in full faith and effect subject to the following amendments:
Paragraph 4b - Is amended to add the following:
There is presently pending in Pinellas County, Florida a mortgage
foreclosure by Bank of America, et al versus Sellers encumbering the
property referred to in paragraph 1,2 of the Purchase and Sale
Agreement. However, Sellers represent that they will reinstate the
mortgages with the funds to be received by this Addendum and will
not further mortgage the property prior to closing.
Paragraph 5.1 - Is amended to read as follows:
The closing (the "Closing") shall be held at the office of Freedom
Title, Clearwater, Florida (the "Escrow Agent") on or before
September 3, 2001, (the "Closing Date"), Buyer acknowledges that
Seller has incurred costs and expenses associated with an earlier
proposed closing date, and will continue to incur such costs and
expenses up to and beyond the closing date of September 3, 200 I.
Buyer agrees to pay Seller the following amounts to compensate
Seller for their costs and expenses incurred and to be incurred:
5.1 a - $50,000.00 is now being held in trust by Paul B. Johnson,
Esquire and the Parties agree that Paul B. Johnson, Esquire may
immediately release said sum to the Sellers which sums will be non-
refundable but, shall be credited to the purchase price at closing.
5.1 b - $260,000.00 shall be paid by Purchaser to Sellers on or before
June 6, 2001 by wire transfer or bank cashier's check. Said sums shall
-
-
be delivered to Paul B. Johnson, Esquire, Seller':; <:1ttorney. Said
sums shall be non-refundable but, shall be credited to the purchase
price at closing.
Paragraph 7.2 - Is amended to read as follows:
If Purchaser breaches this Agreement, Seller may terminate this
agreement and thereupon be entitled to retain any monies already paid
by Purchaser under section 5.1 a and b as liquidated damages (and not
as a penalty) This Section 7.2 shall survive the closing of this
Purchase and Sale Agreement. Additionally, Seller may have the
remedy of specific performance if Purchaser breaches this
Agreement.
Paragraph 9.10 - Is amended to read as follows:
Date of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be null and void unless
executed by all parties by June 4,2001 by 2:00 p.m.. As used in this
Agreement, the terms "Effective Date," "date of this Agreement" or
"date hereof" shall mean and refer to the date of execution of this
Agreement by Seller.
3. The Parties agree that Freedom Title of Clearwater shall prepare warranty deeds
conveying the property which is the subject of this Agreement and that Seller shall
execute such warranty deeds as soon as reasonably possible and said deeds shall be
held by Sellers attorney, Paul B. Johnson in escrow to be turned over to Freedom
Title of Clearwater at closing.
. a)J Development, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company.
Date:
6 - 1- 0'
epts the foregoing offer and agrees to sell the Property on the terms and
2
-
--
SelicI':
date:
Malcolm Croft
date:
Beverley Croft
date:
Bennet Weber
date:
Harriett Weber
The performance by Purchaser to the Second Amended Addendum to the Purchase and Sale
Agreement and the Purchase and Sale Agreement as amended is guaranteed jointly and severally by
the following: atrix Lodging, LLC, Wayne L. Weaver, individually, The Ellenburg Family,
LLC, Gen il . Ellenburg, individually.
MAT
date:
~P'1-~(
THE
date:
l ~'1 -Or
date: 6 ~ '-f / 0 L
Wayne L. Weaver, individually
date:
3
-
-
, \ '<
."_..~,".",,,~...,-;y "-" ''''''''''~~''''~'''V''''''''''''''-'-''''Y~''_:'''''"'''''''''''''''_'~'''"Y'''' ' ,
"Y"'~-"'~'\o-....,-yo., "... .f",.-...lr-'y"...........~.,...
"" '.. '.. -- ".. ... -.....- .. .. --.. -- '" 'n .- .... .. ... .-... -- _.. .... -. -. -- _ ... ... .... '" --. '. .... _ ... _ .. _. _ '_ .. '" '.. _, .... .... _ ....:: (.:: "C',': ,." . ..., ... .
rG!8~!2re2 12:10 elJ.Z5~..S074
,.Ii.L~~.......~___-......,....,__._.,..,JI.._.,_,'_"" ",,, I
II(iOll 'OJ HI,:3J "O.H~..1~r.',~~,L
0i/e4/zae1 1;:J~ 8l'.2~4-ge74
'~"-
PAUL B ,JOH'~SOl'<
GRRlHliLDIJ f:I~
"-~~l.. E J~
.......
"-'-
PAGE 01
iOO~tOQ~
"'~~ ~<
~;.~~
M1r~Qft 11
k 0_
~.. -..:-", - ---
0.;"'01".)' C(O
~.;~~ O:~....
"&t.,__'L~r-{. ~~
;* W*r
A ~ ~---..........~,
aat.tl_
I .-----...
H&m.ft \\'ebCr f-
d.t$e;__..~______........_
..~ ptrrorm~ O}l P.1m:hUt,r to ihe Srcon4 Ammded Addendwr. U) th, PYten." ."~i S';r
AQto<Dltnl and... Pur:l~.. ""d S.I. "''''''''''''' _ded " '_lli'l'<I j oinfly ...d .. Wlroll)' by
lb. r.II.Wi,,: ,If-trio Lcd,lftl. Ltc, W - ro. L W"'...llHll> IdUalb, TM fUr.b.... , ...lily,
LLC, ~,JdD. ItJlfffbuqt b"tJ\lldlJ.tl~,
MATiUX LODGING, I..LC
.... ~ -- " , t>.....4>.-_ -.-..
b)': Get_Ill D, ElIG/'1ln~ra, C~
daw:
-~---".
THI J:tJ..unJV.RG 'AaUt \' LU.~
\"---:p- .... ---. I.. . . _----...-..
try; o.raM D. EI/(nburl. MM."". M~Ulbet
..:-
.L..tt......-
w -.....
- v -~ '"'w- ~_
OttIJ.d 0, EJ.ltntu& jt)djviduaJh.'
..
d.ue:__
--
W;;;:;L:'W~.. incij"ldlJ~iY"----
dlttt:~
~.._~
)
'. r. J."+ _.. r.. J .1. .L. .J.I
"'l",'I..",
L'f"I'" n 1.1
'.'
:-, I"~ ~ I . 1-1,-
, ,c',e) I'! ~ ,j
f".'" It [, l":,!II IC,'"
.,, 1:
s~ 1Il"r :
tvl a" () 11!11 (, \'!
,Ln('
I' ._
H('Vl'llt,\, ( ;. rl
1/7 ' 1- tL
1'1
,/,' 4~:r-~,,\, " ~/
-&---- ..--.. ,
, Bt:l1Jlc.:! \\(;'" i
dalt-'
~Lf"1a/)/
d,] It ! (..--:;/... ,L/ I
.. --,-. ---1- /
~I 'I
/~jt'
i iii/TICII \\ l.. :1,']
GiH~k
dal<!_lJv<.~ Ll_ 1..,09-
(
Th~ perf o rIllU IK I' bv P'.lrchllser to tMe Se~ond Al11end~d Addend'.lIri tl1 the PJI(ha.'e and SJ!I;
Agreern()nl LInd rht' Purchast" <end S:llr. Agreement as amended !~; guaranieed jointl) aile! ~~\'crall) b;.
the (OI!0\\1fl ,\1lttrix l.odeing, LLC Wayne- L. Wfner, individl1alfv, The EIIt'llhurg FI1.mil:,.
LL( ,(;('ralti n. ~lI{'nhurgt individually
"vfA TN.I X LOll(;ING, LLC'
_.~.'"....._--~.- ---.---------.-----..
~v: Gewlid t) r!l~nburg, Chairman
dilte
------..-.-...-.... _.----_..~~----
THE FLl.f'VBl'RG FAMIL ,. LLC
da;t;
lw (~t:>r~lirl n ~:'1(",bl\n", \t1tlnaging Mernn(,f
,
-_.~---_...
date
Cr~rald D, Elkn('\iTf individually
datI:"
\.Vayn~ I \\ (~wn, :ndlvldually
3
-, I lJ \ Ie) J= 2t\ \.-Jae.2' WQa"I""~.
" I L: \I -- (J" - : - : _l" n _ H. '" ~., I ,+
\1\/1 ~_, 'I, _ tl U 1 .1,.J. , "'Q ,. v YV
~-!\UL Ii )U~'I/~.6Z I.JU8.\
F' 0)
FOIJ[ I.~)_~
Seller:
Malcolm Croft
date
-~--._._-
Beverley Croft
~._'--~
date:
date:
Bennet Weber
Han(~tt Weber
date:
The performance by Purch&3er to the Second Amended Addendum to th~ Pur~hase and Sale
Aifeement and the Purch~e Md Sale Ajreemem as lUJ1cnded i, guaran,teedjointl)' ll11d severally by
the following M.fri1 LodlinR. LLC, W.YOt L Wuver, individually, Tbe Ellenburg Family,
LLC, Gerald D. EUtnburt, individually
MA TRIX l.ODGING, LLC
by' Gerald D, EJIenburg) Chairman
date:
THE ELLE.NBtJRG FAMILY J,LC
by: Gerald D. Ellenburgl MlUlaging Member
dare:
'----
Gerald D. Ellenburg, individually
2i1k cJ: OJ~
w~c, individually -
date:
date: 4 ~ 0;
(/
J
,
. ~\'i.
.. \ ,,""~ '-t"
J.UN :t 26;,:1 I]:l
,C\
t1
CpIVAR"
TOiL
CHCH
N908ii
" i 4. t'i
-In.-' .....5:...
J.LJ\:).'::'J
l~:O~'5" 00
:t:::~05 # 00
:l:;;:0;5.00
D8~5~~ B
;
J.
G
'-\\:"
'0
.
\~j
'~
, "
:EOlA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LtC CLEARWATER, FL 33755
City of Clearwater
)ate Type Reference
'6/19/2001 Bill
OU200U
06/1 9/200 1
Original Amt.
1,205.00
Balance Due Discount
1,205.00
Check Amount
Payment
1,205.00
1,205.00
Receipt No:
Date:
1199831516
6/26/2001
Line It
FL Q1-0El-?!'\
Payments:
Method
Check
e
e
Tran Code
04
Description
Flexible Commercial
Revenue Account No.
Payer
OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT
Bank No Acct Check No
2000
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID:
Amount Due
$1,205.00
Amount Paid
$1,205.00
$1,205.00
.
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Items:
.
UI es
HOTELS
City of Clearwater
Osceola Bay Condominiums
Flexible Development Application
6/21/01
e
Transrorultta]
=if
L
~
~
V
/'
7
-L
Original Signed and Notarized Application
12 copies of original application including folded site plans
Check for application fee of $1 ,205.00
Proof of Ownership
Signed and Sealed Surveys (one original, 12 copies)
Tree Survey
Grading Plan
Site Plan
Site Data Table
Reduced Site Plan n ) f)
Landscape Plan
Reduced Landscape Plan 1/ ) i1
Irrigation Plan
Building Elevation Drawings
Reduced Building Elevations /}) /)-
Affidavit to Authorize Agent
Received By:
Signature:
Date:
& /1.
/1-'. ~ / / _/'-:. )
;/ v-I '-,'
. -
01 e~
.
HOTELS
~ W [t~ I ,.. .
~--------,i L
Ui . -I Ii ,..);
. L..---_---.J "--/j
PLANNING & GcVELOPMENT
SERVICES
CITY OF CLEARWATER
TO: RALPH STONE - PLANNING DIRECTOR
FR: JERRY ELLENBURG
RE: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB - AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLANS
June 4, 2001
BY HAND DELIVERY
. !~. I1D I~
1:::"[-"--r=(50 - 2. 5
c.._Q.____
Dear Ralph:
I asked JoAnne Fuchs to bring this note over to you today. She visited with you last week
about the planned downsizing of our condo development. I wanted to thank you for the
assistance you gave her last week and amlounce that we have finalized everything to go
ahead ~ith the downsized development.
Please be ~vised of the key members of the development team:
Myseti'--\ as Chairman o[Matrix I_odging and of Osceola Bay Development
"'/ JoAnne - a~ Pr.esident ?fMatrix D~v:lopment, which is the constructio~ arm o.f
MatrIX Lodgmg. JoNme IS m charge of all our hotel constructIon natlon-
wid~.and will easily handle this project in a swift and efficient mamler.
Candace Zillweger - Candace and her husband, Wayne Weaver, are principal
owners of Matrix Lodging and she will be working closely with JoAnne
and myself on the project.
Accordingly, please advise your staff that we three (along with Wayne) are the only
~uthorized people with ~ whom the project should be dealt and connnunicated, with
JoAnne in the le:::Jn -(I know she is already speaking with architects to which you referred
her.) We look to close on the land within a couple months, immediately apply for demo
and grading permits and get started by November 1. JoAnne will stay on top of all the
filing deadlines, etc.
I know you and your office do not know much about our company, so I am forwarding
herewith some collateral and press data on our hotel chain, which will headquarter in our
building at Cleveland and Ft. Harrison (the Starbucks building).
Thanks for all your help. We promise to be a "better company" for the city to deal with.
Matrix Lodging, LLC and Affiliated Companies
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 240 Clearwater, Florida 33755
Tel (727) 446-3000 Fax (727) 469-8800 eSuitesHotels.com
MAN AGE MEN T
New chain emphasizes technology tools
By John P. Walsh
H&MM SENIOR EDITOR
CLEARWATER, FLA.-Look out, here comes
eSuites hotels.
Gerald Ellenburg, a CleaLwater, Fla., real-
estate developer, plans to open five high-
tech Matrix eSuites hotels by the end of the
year. The first is a $ 15-million, 152-room
hotel in Tampa, Fla.
Ellenburg founded Matrix Lodging
LLC, a family-owned company of which he
owns 51 percent, in 1999 to acquire land
and develop economy business hotels across
the country. The company's growth strate-
gy is to develop 30 hotels comprising 5,000
rooms within two years.
"We came into this business wanting to
be a traditional franchisee of two or three
brands throughout the nation," Ellenburg
said. "We wanted to take a brand and
upgrade it with better access for laptops and
the Internet. We sawwe couldn't do that with
existing brands, and we needed to slice in
between limited and full service."
A typical eSuites room will have an office
complete with a workstation, a computel; a
printer-copier-fax machine and high-speed
Internet access. Internet costs would be
included in the standard room rate of$89 to
$129. Ellenburg said eSuites guests will be
able to reserve rooms from the brand's portal.
Current negotiations will decide on a high-
speed Internet-access provider.
"Each of these rooms will have multiple
port access for two or three people," Ellen-
burg said.
"The developer has been thinking out-
side the box," said Tom O'Neill, president
of Hotel Consulting International. "While
high-quality amenities are standard to the
upscale limited-service sector, the eSuites
e
concept has more cutting-edge facilities and
amenities. The in-room technology pack-
age is innovative to the hotel industry."
"It's priced right," said David Brudney,
principal, David Brudney & Associates, a
hospitality consulting firm.
Ellenburg said he believes the computer
workstation in every room is the key to the
success of the brand, and this is a niche
where needs aLoe not being met. He also said
the hotels won't have restauraLlts and will be
smoke free.
O'Neill said site selection is the most
important criteria for the brand's success.
"Sites should be in the nation's top-per-
forming markets, preferably airports and
high-tech corridors," he said. "The sites
should be within existing successful clusters
of full-service or limited-service hotels with
barriers to entry. The ideal location would be
next to a Marriott [International] or a
Hilton [Hotels Corp.] hotel, whose average
rates are more than $150 in a market where
existing, upscale limited-service hotels are
commanding 80 percent occupancies with
average rates approaching $100."
In addition to the computer worksta-
HOT E L S
tions, eSuites hotels will have business cen-
ters that can handle copy orders or set up
video conferences. They also would offer
workout rooms and pools, and some rooms
could include exercise bikes or stair
machines.
Ellenburg said other brands have
some-but not all-of these features.
"We were using [Cendant Corp's]
Wingate as a role model," he said. "Ours is
a very high-end business-service arena with
high decor and design. The decor will be
unlike aLlything you've seen in a hotel. We
have a whole different room layout. [And]
guests have the option of getting their free
breakfast served to them in their rooms for
a price."
Some differences Ellenburg pointed out
are track lighting in the bathroom, artwork
that reflects the area where the hotel is locat-
ed, leather furniture, glass-block showers and
shutters covering the windows instead of
drapes. Heat will be directed through ducts
instead of wall heaters.
According to Ellenburg, guests will have
a choice of automated or personal check-in
and can buy a pre-assigned room. He also
said the compurer screens will featur~al
food-and-beverage vendors.
Keys to success
Ellenburg said the initial investment in the
chain will be greater than $400 million and
rooms will cost about $80,000 to $90,000
to construct. MKD of New York is the
investment firm involved.
"He's got to have deep pockets and be
very committed to this brand to succeed,"
Brudney said of Ellenburg.
Ellenburg said he doesn't think the slow-
ing economy will affect the growth of the
brand.
"I've always done better in a slowing
economy," he said. ''A slower economy
means lower interest rates, and we're com-
ing in $30 below the full-service hotels. I'm
a recessionary economics kind of a guy."
O'Neill said debt, equity financing and
identifYing optimal sites are other challenges
- .
for the brand. land, Ore.; and Seattle.
"It will be important to analyze many "It will be important to reach the critical
alternative sites cost effectively in order mass, 100 to 200 properties, to adequately
to determine the best possible sites," he penetrate the selected markets," O'Neill
said. "[Also] the lack of debt and equity said. "Matrix should not develop in mar-
for new hotels has reduced the pipeline kets that are not already represented by the
for hotel development. For a developer successful brands so as to maximize their
who has special access to debt and equi- advantage. In addition, with such a strategy
ty, this is an important advantage. [It's] they will not be faced with new competi-
better to build when there are barriers to tion from established brands."
finance for others." Ellenburg said after the first 15 eSuites
"They could end up paying dearly for a hotels are developed, Matrix Lodging
good site because they don't have a long his- might solicit other operators who want a
tory," BrudneysaidofMatrix. "To get a good license to help develop additional hotels
site, you have to have a good track record." for the brand.
Other eSuites hotels are scheduled to be "We want long-term ownership of these
built simultaneously in the San Francisco hotels," he said. "This is our brand, and
area; Phoenix; Albuquerque, N.M.; and we're going to build it. We're going to pro-
Jacksonville, Fla., otten within walking dis- vide better design and decor and technolo-
tance ttom more upscale hotels. Target mar- gy service. The technology will pull people
kets for future eSuites hotels include Adanta; from the limited- and full-service hotels."
Miami; Houston; Dallas; Los Angeles; Port- jwalsh@advamtar.com
@Reprinted from HOTEL & MOTEL MANAGEMENT, February 5, 2001 AN ADVANSTAR .. PUBLICATION Printed in U.S.A
..Suites
HOTELS
esuiteshotels.com
-
FORTUNI:
May 2001
's...... 'T
, . ~ @#
.. .' ,@;~~ ~ 4.,_~.
.~.I;
';...v....
,. -
t'::
I
'1
i 1 t~\i\/:" [I i inl SII1CS::1 tr(rv\~L
It: J
~
~...,'
,~.
tJ 1
.
~! ;' c
-.c..---
~---
I ~---.r
legroom
costs
ENADAlerl
~"'.~"'-~"".".
~~~'-,
.~_~ -'-J"~ <
c~.
HIGHLY
WIRED ACT
!rrl\~
/ .~.-:
~-' ~,i~a;~b='==-::~~~-
~ir~~' ~; -. · .......'. ,. '
~;~:c2_~~~'_d_=-=~~_'. . 'fl fTl
The cl~~od also ~~~~'!iI4~~: . .,C 'd'._ i
from ..-~=~ ~~ / . -'-~ ~c:.~.
:';:,:~~' 'H ,h, .~" ~~~V,::..
C:lstomizJ.ble \\!~bpJ.ges . --- ~'- / 4~, ~.:.). ,-
WIll greer p'ucsts, who C<ln FCl ~.. \"\ '.')
~ 0 LJ_ ~, '
.~n-roonl en1ail 2CC01.Uns. j\ 24--hour ",
By Jane Hodges
~.:+.._--..., '.--
~
\........-....
',......"
Not so long ago, '\vired" in rnost hotels
meam the !)usiih~ss lTavckr had [0 hum for "
data pon, lO Find it wedged herwtccl1 the
dOld:,]e b..'ds, PIll,',ging in and logging on required
advanced skills or, alternatively, a mad
d:1sh to the lobby's business cemer, panrlIlg,
i) guest was with a locked door: "I-lours of
8
" Sorry\ guy, no cll1ail
[0 5
Luckily, ,his scene is becoming a rhing of the
pa'il. ivrosr chains and many bourique propenies
hJve become seriolls about the
\vircd rr;1veJer and nor .:a~y-to-access
dam pons for a dial--uj) connecrion bm
access as welL I'JigJh'w:l chains eYen offc:r [echnical
suppOrt on-site, with sraffers calkd "technology
butlers" (Rilz--Carlron) coordinators"
(Inter-Continental I-lords and Resons), ;md
(Four Seasons Hotels and R,~sorts),
Still. ,here arc wired hotels and hotds with
Hel'" is a look at some old and some new
that believe wired is inspired,
,; J.,\' l(_~Lfl'}:ijU!
(-'
eSuites Hotels
Cerald D, FliCllburg, chairman of independem
hOld chain Nlauix LodginG in Clc"arwa,er, ELi.,
to roll om rlh' Kinkc;s of hocel chains. l-k;
first eSuites llnrel:; will open next \'car Il1
N,M" and THnpa, Fla,
Each eSuite will oiT':T a PC {with a DVD/CD
copier-Fax-primer unit, high-,speed Net
access (T3 speeds), digiral cabk television, three
dara ports for peripherals and lapwps, online
concierge s"n'ices, srocked rehigerarors, and
rnl.cru\vavl,~ o\,'ens.
business cenrer \vill ()n~,~T
snch as colo" printing.
\vhere iVIatrix CSuitl"S arc Searrkc;
Fla,; and Rohncn Park Calif Besr of aiL rh:
" ,~SuikS S99-,) U9.
eSuites Hotels
2021 Americas Parkway N.E" Albuquerque, NM 87110,
727-446-3000 or 877-469-8400, www.esuiteshotels.com
Rates: $Y9-~51 in-rOOtTI trluJHlilj8 cordless '.'vii-h
and con f.3-rSil ct::: feutures; unit :n-
roorn;
business ct:ntei~; v-/irl::;~ess
buffei' breokfcst; Ckl-
l,;ccess;
!~et. oc.:e-ss in cornrnon :.JreiJ~; hee
siie gym; end fccilities.
-,~-i. ~ i. f...
The Wyndham Garden
'v7yndham \\'ij"{;kss
vice chaillyvick.' ~n 2000, bur
C:enrcr property :;er".-es as h-)]' recb-
bc.ta The l-H)t(;L ir: [he hear[ or
>J~'~
downtO\\lno is \virh \~,,'j;\~k.ss check.,
in and ch"ckout. T 1 lines are availahle at extra
cost bur Dlernbers of d'.lc chain"s a\\'cl,rds
progranl get free T'l access,
\\fyndhatn eTO IvIark Hedley says the \\'i,c!ess
initiatives offer a or what's ro corne at San
BUSINESS '2,0 i j
Francisco's Pickwick Hotel when the chain completes
renovations. Designed to cater to gadgetAoting exec-
utives, the Pickwick won't even offer a check-in desk.
flat-panel high-definition digital nr sets will auto-
matically snap on \vhen guests, who have checked in
on wireless devices, let themselves into rooms with
smart: cards. The televisions will double as emertain..
mem and business devices-providing access to
email, office applications, video confetencing, and
\Xleb entertainment.
The Wyndham Garden
2015 Market Center Blvd., Dallas, TX 75207
214-741-7481, www.wyndham.cam/dallasmarketcenter
Rates: $59,.$235; iNoom cordless phone; T1 access is
$9.95 per doy or free for Wyndham ByRequestloyally
members; wireless check-in.: roam.to-room networking ovail-
able by request,: and som&day loundlY ond cleaning
plus valet service.
MIAMI
The Marlin
Travelers who need to do business in Miami might
as well do it in style-and near the beach. Ar leasr
rhar's hmv the all-suites Marlin hotel, located in
Somh Beach, would have it. \Xlith recording com-
pany South Beach Studios on..site (Chris Blacbvell,
rounder of Island Records, owns the Marlin), rhe
hotel attracts a hip dicntele-U2 and Aerosmirh
have stayed there. Wl1ile the technology at the
Marlin trends toward the recreational---WebTV in
every room, high-end stereos, CD/cassette player-.-
the botd is still South Beach's most wired property.
It offers gucsts services sllch as in-room ernail
addresses and mobile phone and PC remals. .And
oh, topless sunbathing is allowed ar the pool at sis-
ter horel, the Tides.
The Marlin
1200 Collins Ave., Miami, FL 33139,305-604-5063
or 800-688-7678, www.marlinhotel.com
Rates: $195-$275 June-September; $280-.$395 Odo-
bel'-May; two in-room two-line cordless phones; 'NeblV
Net access with personal email features; massage services
and acupuncture; the hotel is part of Ct netwol-k of proper-
ties, including the Tides, which means guests can use room
charge privileges beyond the Marlin; and Collins Avenue
ond the boardwolk oiong Saulh Beoch offer some at Mia.
mi's finest dining and trendy bors.
NEW YORK
The Holiday Inn Wall Street
This isn'r New YiHk's hippesr hotel, but wired it is.
This downrown stalwart, walking distance from the
Federal Reservc and \Xlorld T\-adt, Center, has aggres-
sivelv transi()l'llled itself inro a techic haven, The hotel
has creared a useftd in--roolll oHlce setup, complere
with S-fe'ot desk and ergonomic chair; '124-hour
business cenrer; and wireless or automated check-in,
Guescs can ffHward room calls to mobile phones, and
those who reserve a suire on the "S.1vLA,R.T." 1100r
(for an extra $50 per night) can cake in-room laptops
ofT-premises, receive COlllplimenl:Jl'J' cocktails, and
enjoy access to a nearby fitness dub.
Holiday Inn Wall Street
15 Gold St., New York, NY 10038,212-232-7800
or 8oo-HOUDAY, www.halidayinnwsd.com
Rates: $309+ Corporate rotes ClvCliloble; two..iine cordless
phone in eoch room; in-100m PCs ovoilable, with DVD/CD
ployer ond ndwork printing capabilities; Internet TV; 1'1
occess is $10 per w~reiess check~in; 9ues1's in the
"S.M.A.RT" suites get a printer ond laptop (vihich COil be
removed from the free 1'1 access, breakfost buf.
tet, cocktaik, und privile~les ot the 24-hol.lr busi..
ness center; quests con torwmd room colis 10 their cellulm
phones; all r;)oms hove de~ks vtith ergonomic ChO)fS ond
office some.day and cleoning.
SEATTLE
The Elliott Grand Byatt
\:</ired wirh more than 10 miles of computer cable and ;1
redundant net\vork aud a 2,4-h01.lr information systems
srafTfor guests, rhe ne\v $140 million EllioH is a srate-of~
the-art hotel. It opens in rnid-jLme, but :tlready Immunex
has reserved conference space for later this ye;u'.
The Elliott is also luxurious, ''liTh stone floors, How-
ers in every guest roorn, ~) 2..:i-hour c(Jnciergc: serv-ice
(digital and human), and the entire hotel operates on a
wireless nerwork. Guesrs can use high-speed connections
on their own computers or simply nun on rhe Inrernet...
enabled plaslna screen rclevision ffJI basic btowsing or
for enlisting help (l'om the digital concierge (see the fact
box below for details). located next t:o rhe \'(/ashington
State Convention and Trade Center, the hotel also offers
access to convention events in real time or on :uchived
video,;,
JANE HODGES
,
-I. I.
.~o:Jt-
~t.hr.
'.r'1lt.1 "",~,.
.' ....IJ......" ....~!!.." ',.,., .l!\.,I<!l?<"
,>~:",~ \'~:~ '-,'
~b-tL.
.J. a.. ,YVl~CvV1_ .... / '.l. (){~
H c-fO:f1 -(-f3 CirdJ--ff
pass. f30t4'- ~.0L.
o ,/l.-J ( 'L.i(J lACJ2 :t c()
~
/dd ~Le
Sc,I/f.."Q.. ! Iv r-'
ALLE~\1 T~r;',.-'~ JOS....~
, ,', 1l!':'liII ~ ~ '~I':':'-"',".j ~ ~,""",:p "':"""_':.:'1,',
SOL,ICITOf"!S' '
MED\.VAY HOUSE
18-22 CANTELUPE ROAD
EAST GRINSiEAD, \iV.sussex
RH1923J
Tel: 013'~2 22~.::<>1 / ::-:5.81'7
(.,,"",". '30.. Q. ') r'" '''': , . ,~,. -,,, I: "':AO)
~....,. '. ---'.-; ~ 'ow.......;.....
_m _Ie~ _ :i8~ri ::5t J/~~~eJ
-- - - -1- --- -O-AK - -I 8 '- -- -- ----- -- -- - - - --
~ 3 II
__ 06 k_~_2o_
3 y DAl<___J~il
Y 5 ~---I If
5 r If
b I'
'1 If
/5-5.
3) If
o k ~
f"V L o...u.f'-e l 61 LA S +e r
I J I
d.. Lf II
I
~O.
lION
- ,
,
.J
~ g> Ir
{ b 'I
(f
o
, '
, "
g"
8 if
'-II(
D eo.A
_ c A k ~ 8 II
o A K ). 7 /I LI
~??__ _ _u3~~__c;l..~r y L~~r.~_L__5
3(
'3
33
~
3S
3
3
3g
3q
Lf
I
~
lf3
L/~
Lis
Lf
Lf
tt
'19
50
51
5
, SS
SG
J-.
5
y
-
-----
~
D
VVltL G-JJo {/ ~
,r
ee
-~/ // h
--------- --_J c~e-____(:L_td:_L___J1_e?___ _____ _ ____ . ___
-- ___HuH -. --- - -...--.-- ---- --[-J---....--.-..-.-----ct---.---- -. .-.------.-- -----..---
- -.----------. --5-1 - ~- ~ 6--C2tt&____
-----------~--3
--.--- --5-9-
----in
G!
G~
3
tLf
b
I f
{f
"
4 ....../ -.
.
l'I1lL.. .. ruHY, FLURIDA
---- -----------
2C147326 04-20-200) 10:59:51 i'IJ):
51 0CD-IW.lD..K OOl/ll8iETT m
()((()()()XOO
u: ~:
RECORDIHG 002 PrifS
roc STf'*' - 00219
ff'G:
1
3
EPG:
$10.50
$2,240.00
10 Prepared by and return to:
FREEDOM TITLE AGENCY, INC.
635 Cleveland St., Suite C
Clearwater, FL 33755
.I ~
leS ,p-
"
AIolT
I,lT
-If:?!). ~~erty Appraisers Parcel Identification Number:
R218 _ _'lJ!- 09/29/15/53370/000/0010
, . 09/29/15/00000/430/0600
00-II~SS4 APR-20-2000 10:~SM
PINELLAS CO' BK 10884 PO 2359
1.........0
TDTAl:
P CllD< rilL TENDERED:
I IL ClWlGE:
[,Y ir!tL_ OCFtJTY QERK
$2,~Jl1.50
$2,2I'JJ.5O
$.00
WARRANTY DEED
I
,i_. a 'QntY..:Deed.iJ!f.ade'lthe,1f:,daY,Of~,"Ap,eJl...... 2aro " by OSCEOLABAY.,- 'He, ',.
. ... I' _.........,.....* t,. f. ....
, ;., ' ., a rida Corporation, heremafter called the GRANTOR, to MALCOLM CROFf and
BEVERLEY CROFf, Husband and Wife, as to an Eighty (80%) Percent interest, and
BENNETT WEBER and HARRIETT WEBER, Husband and Wife, as to a Twenty (20%)
Percent interest, whose post office address is t
c(o '8 W&6eR. ~I /tJoH51(;1tL I!.trftD ,CA~lS Me J ~8R.SG'l USA
hereinafter called the GRANTEES:
.....~.... ~""r'" '.
IWhemlcr used ha'eln lhe tcnns "GRANTOR' and "GRANTEE' include .11 tho pan;.. 10 this iRllJUm<nl and .he he;.., Jepl rep<<_laIJves and lSIip or
ndlvidual.. and the .ucccuors and usilN or corporations)
WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of$IO.OO
and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants,
bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the GRANTEES all that
certain land in Pinellas County, State of Florida, to-wit:
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF,
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging
or in anywise appertaining.
:7.~' ~t.,. :~~.~ .'
'::' , . T~? HA. VE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever,
~~'~'C' .:~.~: ';'~'~.~:'~".' _
AND the GRANTOR hereby covenants with'said GRANTEES that the GRANTOR is
lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful ' .....
authority to sell and convey said land; that the GRANTOR hereby fully warrants title to said land
and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land
is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 19 Cf<j .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said GRANTOR has signed and sealed these presents the
day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
,/1
~~
Witness
Printed Name: ~ A ~
~~Jo.-d\--
~ "JAG'CSoN
:;c:;(];, ~[b(
B erley Croft
Its President
,
- Witness
. PrintedN~~.:,
::{:, ...
'x' ;
STATE OF ~We;;.-r J\~.~.n;;'/C
COUNTY 0 ~N~ C-/H07J \A... jo{ .
..,;.~...;.._ JJ1e.foregoing.instroment was acknowledged before me this J.!:!:.~ay of r__c
Ii'.,' - ~ll-- ,~, by Beverley Croft, President of Osceola Bay, Inc., a Florida
Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced
:v ~IV~ l-l e,a(~ as identification.
~1^~ ty.(.?fhLl-{f>.f
~~(J.r(ON~ h.J-
My Corom. Expires: J( I u,.{ ..-.q ol'f-nW
Wl-nf- A-u..eM ~
So \...oL u.. ~ N
AUJ!NTICEHURST
SOLICITORS
MBDWA Y HOUSE
II-n CAN'TI!UJPE ROAD
EAST OIllNSJ'!AD, W SUSSEX
RHI01BJ
/'
'~-
.
P1~RS COUNTY rLR.
Orr.REC.BK 10B84 PG 2~60
LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A"
/:
Parcel I: Lots A and B of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION according to the map or plat
thereofas recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76, Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida.
Together with all submerged lands, bay bottoms, and riparian rights thereunto appertaining or in
anywise belonging, more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the Northwest corner of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat
Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida, and run thence S. 12 degrees 06'
16" W. along the Westerly line of said Subdivision, 65.48 feet to the southwest corner of said
Subdivision; thence S 89 degrees 54' 00" W 630.0 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of
the channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northerly, along the Easterly boundary of said channel, to
an intersection with the Westerly extension of the Northerly line of said CLOVIS C. LUTZ
SUBDIVISION; thence Easterly, along the Westerly extension of the said Northerly line, 637.0
feet more or less to the point of beginning. The above described property is subject to an
easement to the West Coast Inland Navigation District on that part lying within 250 feet of the
center line of the West Coast Intracoastal Waterway Canal, containing 0.2 acre more or less.
That part of a certain (10) feet of unnamed alley extending West to the waters of
Clearwater Harbor from the West right-of-way of Osceola Avenue and lying south of the Freiler
property and lying North of Lot A of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat
Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida. Said alley having been vacated by
the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida, and being the same property as shown on Quit
Claim Deed from A.K. Freiler and Sarah May Freiler, his Wife, in O.R. 589, page 289, Public
Records of Pine lias County, Florida.
A parcel of submerged land in Clearwater Harbor in Section 9, Township 29 South,
. _ Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows:
,'''.! .:"~.~1h::.:;.),,~:,~ :">t";"4 ,,'~ ';.i.. ~.j'"
Begin at the Northwest corner of Lot A of the CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as
recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida, said point being
on the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor, said Point of Beginning being 555.97 feet
North and 1949.66 feet West of the Southeast comer of said Section 9. From aforesaid P.O.B.
run thence N 89 degrees 24' 16" W 282.41 feet to the City of Clearwater Bulkhead Line; thence
run N 07 degrees 28' 50" East 10.07 feet along said Bulkhead Line; run thence South 89 degrees
24'16" East 281.21 feet to the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor; run thence South 00
degrees 38' 00" West 10.00 feet along said average high water line to the P.O.B.
-7
Parcel II: From the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; run West 398.68 feet to the West line of Osceola
Avenue; thence North 0 degrees 38' East along the West line of Osceola Avenue 545.68 feet to
the North line ofan alley as shown in JONES SUBDIVISION to the Town of Clearwater,
Florida; thence East 58.0 feet to Point of Beginning; thence North 83.16 feet more or less; thence
West 250.55 feet, more or less, to the waters of Clearwater Bay; thence South 22.5 deg. West
90.01 feet more or less to a point 285 feet West of the Point of Beginning; thence East 285.0 feet
to Point of Beginning. Together with all submerged land and riparian rights appurtenant to said
tract described as follows:
,-j
Tract 23, from an intersection of the North line of Jones Street and the West line of Osceola
Avenue of JONES SUBDIVISION in Clearwater, Florida; run North along West line of Osceola
Avenue 190 feet; thence West 213.9 feet to average high water line of Clearwater Bay to Point of
Beginning; thence 725 feet to channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northeasterly along East side of
channel a distance of 83.17 feet due North; thence East 725 feet to average high water line of
Clearwater Bay; thence in a southwesterly course along the average high water line to Point of
Beginning. LESS that portion described in that certain Order for Taking filed 1-13-61 in O.R.
Book 1083, page 97, public records of Pine lias County, Florida.
.
EXISTING TREE CONDITION
EVALUATION
Tree # Grade Diam. Species
1 4 18 Oak
2 3 20 Oak
3 4 16 Oak
4 5 6 Oak
5 5 9 Bay
6 5 6 Oak
7 3 24 Oak
8 4 15 Oak
9 3 32 Oak
10 ,., Cluster Cherry Laurel
.J
11 5 9 Bay
12 3 24 Oak
13 2 20 Hickory
14 3 10 Cherry Laurel
15 5 28 Oak
16 4 16 Oak
17 2 10 Oak
18 4 18 Cherry Laurel
19 5 18 Cherry Laurel
20 - - Removed
21 2 24 Cherry Laurel
22 3 28 Oak
23 3 11 Oak
24 4 24 Oak
25 5 44 Oak
26 4 48 Oak
27 1 27 Oak
28 3 5 Cherry Laurel
29 3 5 Cherry Laurel
30 3 18 Bay
31 1 11 Oak
32 2 18 Oak
33 5 25 Oak
34 1 12 Camphor
35 4 38 I Oak
36 4 26 Oak
37 4 24 Oak
38 5 30 Oak
39 5 6 Cherry Laurel
40 4 8 Oak
41 4 ,.,,.., Oak
.JL
42 2 32 Oak
43 4 I 26 Oak
44 1 26 Oak
45 4 20 Oak
46 3 17 Oak
47 4 36 Oak
48 ,., 20 Oak
.J
49 5 6,8,10 Bay
50 4 15 Oak
It
Grades: I-Healthiest to 5-Dead or Diseased
Diameter: inches
Tree# Grade Diam. Species
51 4 24 Oak
52 4 16 Oak
53 - - Gone
54 - - Gone
55 3 23 Oak
56 2 7 Magnolia
57 4 26 Oak
58 - - Gone
59 2 - Umbrella Tree
60 2 18 Cabbage Palm
61 3 - Mimosa
62 4 13 Hickory
63 4 14 Bay
64 3 6 Cherry Laurel
65 4 5 Bay
17
6'
r-
"'tl
o
o
r
--
150'
--
5'-8R
11'-4"
-a
)>
:::0
^
:z tN U-l (",.,.J U-l U-l N N --a "'0 Ll --a "lJ -0
G:i I I 1 I , I I ~ f""1 fT1 ~ f"T1 M
c: C C c: C c c ~ :z z :z z :z
z z :z z z: Z :z --l --l -I --l --l
I I :r:: :I: ::r: I
:::j :::j :::j ::::::j :::j --I =1 0 0 0 0 0 0
...,., "T'1 " ." ...,., .." c: c: c c c c s::
'1 r.fJ c.n U) r..n VI c.n [""T1
5 L 5 b 5 L 5 ("')
0 0 fT1 fT1 [""T1 i'T"1 i'T"1 fTl
::r:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,........, ......... ..--.. .......... ..--.. ,........, )>
;;:0 :::0 :::0 ;lJ ;::0 :;0 :;:0 -' ~ ~ ..... z
o. 0 0 0 o. 0 ("')
,........, ..--.. .......... ......... .......... ......... .........
CD. Ol 00 CXl CD. CD 00 I I I I I I J>
1 I I I I I I 0 O~ 0 0 0 0" r
" ,
OJ CXl~ OJ CO CO~ ex; OJ
. (") (') ("') (") (") (')
(') (") (") ("') (') ('? 0 r \; r r 5 5
G) G) G)
I; r- r 5 5 r- r '-'" ........ -- ........., '-' ........
G) G) G) G:i
'-" -- ......... '-' -- -- .........
28'
--l
rrt
Z
:z
u:;
(")
o
c:
;::0
--i
CLt:_
','f W
A r [ R
HARe
o R
\
\t
\
Iii \ ,
\
\
\
\
HARVARD ,
JOLLY \
CLEES
TOPPE 1
-.-
ARCHITECTS, RA
A I A
;'[:><~II
)~.!'
;1
IXI c-'u " '
11'; ";,,,-::;::1, i
I",," '~'~'r"c'''---
,
\~\
1 \ \
\ \ \ \
\ '~\ \
\ 'I \
\ \
\ ;\~
\ ~
\", ,,~;;;:
'.,
CD "''-,. -~-,,-~..
""',
'--"1
jJ1\ q
-
PLANT KEY
co
""""""" lM: """
cu
CIW'E """'"
SG~ SFA~
r"
sp{ . t ~PAlU
a8~~~~
WP 0 w...."""'" P.....
?T '& PITTOSPOAUIoI
VP C# VARlEGA.TED PfTTOSP<.'lfiMI
'!N () SWEET 'MIUANUN
lH tHeM HAWI110RN
<S '""" """"
PH ptNl( HIBiSCUS
OP f:iZ] 0'r'STER F'lNff
)(; i~ AZTEC GRASS
EG 8=::&2 ~ GWfT
TREE
TREES TO
15 OAKS
2 MAGNO
1 HICKOR
2 MYRTLE
9 SABAL P
3 PODOCA
2 CAMPHO
3 JACARA
TOTAL
PROHIBIT
1 BRAZ. P
TREES TO
1 LlVEOA
1 SENEGA
6 SAVANN
2 CANARY
5 CRAPE M
4 SEA GR
24 SABAL
15WASHJ
TREE REP
27.5 TREE
573"-110
PLAN
CODE QT
LO
SD
SH 6
CM 5
SG 4
SP 24
CI 2
WP 15
PT 34
VP 80
SV 14
KS 13
PH 4
IH 11
OP 14
AG 30
EG 18
.
II
i
""'-- EXISTING WOOD DOCK
C I. t A
f? II A
.rE:R
e
;t
~
~
s
~
~
-11"~Ql"
I
!
HARe
o IT
Iii
,
,
r
!I
IL--
H"
P"",,IHG
""'-'C€
"""'"'"
1o"Cltn.l.*
..
JO'
.
2'\'
KEY
eON<
---..-------......"->.",
~~~
^\" \
'\ \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
STOW<;E
Sf"""""
<<~ BtI(Ijc:rIYtJ
e~~
--..._j~ ;~I
1 SI.J'
1'0 1M"
i:t )0-
I ~" ':1 '\
5" ~_,:sJ, U"j
I fA,'K.X I
1 '.'~:I.'il~ :E~~~~ ~
%1 ~
.,"'1"11 ~.
: I II ~
I i I~ -
I j !~ 21.%'
:.".
TEN
2-<'AR
GWaS
.
.....
0' WAU..
.
..'
m
e
*""""-P.....
HARVARD
JOLLY
CLEES
TOPPE
0T1Q l1lED
AS '-'IlWD
.'.~.,J^
x~
ARCHITECTS, ~A
A I A
-
e
ACTION AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING
CITY OF CLEARWATER
August 21, 2001
Meeting called to order at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall
ITEM A - APPROVAL OF MINUTES - 07/17/01
ACTION -APPROVED AS SUBMITTED - 6:0
ITEM B - CONSENT AGENDA - APPROVED AS SUBMITTED LESS ITEM #B3 - 6:0
Item #B1 - 3011 Virginia Avenue: Taylor G. Binqham III - Owner/ Applicant.
Request annexation of 0.11 acre to the City with a Land Use Plan amendment to
RU, Residential Urban, and rezoning to LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential
District at BayView City, Subdivision, Block 1, North 47 feet of Lots 5 and 6.
ANX 01-06-12 (Recommended Approval)
Item #B2 - 2652 McMullen-Booth Road: Countryside Joint Venture/City National
Bank of Florida, Trustee - Owner/ Applicant. Request flexible development approval
to permit a 6-foot high fence with gate in the required front setback along
McMullen-Booth Road at The Vinings at Countryside, Lot 1, with one condition.
FL 01-05-22
Item #B3 - 304-308 North Osceola Avenue: Malcolm & Beverley Croft / Bennett &
Harriett Weber (Osceola Bay Development, LLC) - Owner/ Applicant. FL 01-06-25
SEE ITEM #D1
ITEM C - REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCE/RECONSIDERED ITEMS - None.
ITEM D - LEVEL THREE APPLICATIONS
Item #01 - 304-308 North Osceola Avenue: Malcolm & Beverley Croft / Bennett &
Harriett Weber (Osceola Bay Development, LLC) - Owner/ Applicant. Request
flexible development approval to increase the height of an attached dwelling
development from 50 feet to 150 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project at Sec. 09-29-15, M&B 43.06, and Clovis C. Lutz, Lots A &
B. FL 01-06-25
ACTION - RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - 4:2 (PLlSKO/MORAN) - with conditions:
1) final design of building to be consistent with conceptual elevations submitted; 2)
density of site to be limited to 25 dwellings units; 3) Stormwater Management
requirements to be met, prior to issuance of building permits; 4) a new fire hydrant
assembly/new Fire Department connections to be installed on exterior (street side)
of proposed six-foot wall, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; and 5) all
signage to comply with Code.
acd080 1
08/21/01
-
it
Item #02 - Amendments to Community Development Code: City of Clearwater _
Applicant. Request recommendation for approval of amendments to the Code: 1)
amend notice requirements for continuances; 2) add provisions requiring
neighborhoods to conduct a vote on each development standard proposed as part of
a NCOD (Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District); 3) add provisions specifying
procedures to amend or eliminate NCOD requirements; and 4) eliminate percentage
of development rights that may be transferred from a site. T A 01-07-03
ACTION - RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - 6:0
ITEM E - LEVEL TWO APPLICATIONS
Item #E1 - 211-217 Dolphin Point: Houle Industries, Inc. - Owner/Applicant.
Request flexible development approval: 1) reduce minimum lot width from 150 feet
to 125 feet; 2) reduce north front setback along Dolphin Point from 25 feet to 4
feet; 3) reduce south rear setback from 15 feet to 0 feet; and 4) increase the height
from 30 feet to 50 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project at Island Estates of
Clearwater, Unit 5-A, Lots 10-11. FL 01-06-23
ACTION - APPROVED WITH AMENDED HEIGHT INCREASE - 5:0 - with conditions:
1) final design of buildings to be consistent with conceptual elevations submitted;
2) density to be limited to nine dwellings units and building height to be limited to
44.5 feet; 3) Solid Waste & Stormwater Management requirements to be met, prior
to issuance of building permits; 4) setback reduction for hot tub along seawall to be
secured through application to the Board of Adjustment and Appeal for Building and
Flood, prior to issuance of building permits; and 5) all signage to comply with Code.
ITEM F - DIRECTORS ITEMS
Addition to expert witness list - Richard Kephart, Senior Planner
ACTION -APPROVED - 6:0
Aqenda - September 14, 2001 Work Shop at Municipal Services Buildinq
ACTION -REVIEWED
ITEM G - ADJOURNMENT - 5:21 p.m.
acd080 1
2
08/21/01
DATE,TIME
F A>< NO. mAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
~10DE
RANSMISSION 'v'ERIFICATION REPOFn
I....
0:::,/13 Og: 12
g4458035
00:05:33
1_,
.:,
OV
~=;T At'mAF:D
ECM
TIME 08/13/2001 Og:lg
HAME PLAH
FAX 7275624576
TEL 7275524557
~y -3D g t'J. Oj~e.t>\c...
~ () \ -tJtc - 2S-
RANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 08/14/2001 08:37
NAtvlE PLAN
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
DATE, ntvlE
FAX t.~O. / NA~1E
DUF:A T I ON
PA(iE (S)
RESULT
MODE
08/14 Em: 31
'34E,gs::mO
OO:05:2g
13
m<
ST At'mAF~D
EC:;r'/l
___-----l
-
e
LL
>-
I-
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727) 562-4576
TO: ~e..{"'\ \<-t:>U ~'" J ~t:lf~~" O~ ~~.
FAX: L\ '-\ \0 - <6C) ~ \..,
FROM: So.n~ Ua.r-~ t -J t:L-1 5\.0 L.. - 'tS ~ 1-
DATE: Y'J I~ 10 ,
MESSAGE:
Attached is a copy of the Agenda for the COillllmnity Development Board
Meeting of ~\ v \ as well as the staff
report for 3c~ - 3(:)~ ~. D~c..-e4)\o.... ~ .
~ L- t>\ ...t>1.o - ~ ~
c. c.. '. (j"bAt-\V"\ ~ ~ /
'-
~~ J;>/2..u.
Number of Pages (Including Cover): \3
e
e
LL
o
f-
()
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727) 562-4576
TO: -:::J~ Prr\" ~v c-\-\- s J ~-\-f, ~ -:D~.
FAX: l.\~~ -~~bO
FROM: ~ \J..-.
\
DATE: ?~\O\
'S b -z. - l...\ S 8 1..-
MESSAGE:
Attached is a copy of the Agenda for the Comnmnity Development Board
Meeting of ~ \ ;;) \ \ 0 \ as well as the staff
report for 3(;:)\..\ "'3C)~ ~, D5C.~t~ ~.
t:: L... 0 l --0 <... - '2- S-
C-'- '. ~ ~s \-,
":>'i:)~~1I O~
Number of Pages (Including Cover): \ ~
--
It
LL
Revised 8/1 % 1
o
>-
f-
u
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Date: Tuesday, August 21,2001
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor,
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
(City Hall Commission Chambers)
The City of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special
accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. Kindly refrain from using beepers,
cellular telephones and other distracting devices during the meeting.
Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this Board must have a
record of the proceedings to support such appeal.
CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Chair Figurski
Vice-Chair Petersen
Gildersleeve
Hooper
lAoran
Mazur
Plisko
Altemate member Hibbard
City Staff
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: July 17,2001
B. REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES/RECONSIDERATION: None
C. RECONSIDERED ITEM: None
CDB agenda - August 2 L 2001 - Page 1
e
e
D. LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS:
1. Case: ANX 01-06-12 - 3011 Virginia Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Mr. Taylor G. Bingham III.
Location: 0.11 acres on the southwest comer of Meadow Lark Lane and Virginia
Avenue.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.11 acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential
Urban Classification (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single-Family District (County) to LMDR, Low
Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: A single-family dwelling.
Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
2. Case: Text Amendment - TA 01-07-03
Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department.
Request: Amendments to the Community Development Code regarding notice
requirements for continuances, adding provisions requiring neighborhoods to conduct a
vote on each development standard proposed as part of a Neighborhood Conservation
Overlay District, as well as provisions specifying procedures for amending or eliminating
requirements of such districts, and eliminating the percentage of development rights that
may be transferred from a site.
Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
E. LEVEL 2 APPLICATIONS:
1. Case: FL 01-05-22 - 2652 McMullen Booth Road
Owner(s)/Applicant: City National Bank of Florida, Trustee.
Location: 15.7 acre located on the southwest comer of Allen Avenue and McMullen
Booth Road.
Zoning: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a six-foot high fence with gate in the
required front setback along McMullen Booth Road.
Proposed Use: A six-foot high ornamental, perimeter fence/gate as part of an existing
multi-family development.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Plarmer.
CDB agenda - August 21, 2001 - Page 2
e
e
2. Case: FL 01-06-23 - 211 - 217 Dolphin Point
Owner/Applicant: Houle Industries, Inc.
Location: 0.37 acres located on the south side of Dolphin Point, approximately 550 feet
west of Larboard Way.
Zoning: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot width from 150 feet
to 125 feet, reduce the front (north) setback along Dolphin Point from 25 feet to four feet,
reduce the rear (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet and to increase the height from
30 feet to 50 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project.
Proposed Use: A nine-unit condominium building.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
3. Case: FL 01-06-25 - 304-308 North Osceola Avenue
Owners: Malcom Croft, Beverley Croft, Bennett Weber and Harriett Weber.
Applicant: Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
Location: 1.07 acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, approximately
200 feet north of Jones Street.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of an attached dwelling
development from 50 feet to 150 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Proj ect.
Proposed Use: A 25-unit condominium development.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
F. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS:
G. ADJOURNMENT
S:IPlal1l1il1g Depm111lel1tlC D Blagel1das DRC & CDBlCDBI2001108 AlIgllstlCDB agenda 8-21-200J.doc
L
CDB agenda - August 21. 2001 - Page 3
e
-
CDB Meeting Date: August 21, 2001
Case Number: FL 01-06-25
Agenda Item: E3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ST AFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
PLANS REVIEWED:
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
PLAN CATEGORY:
ZONING DISTRICT:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
304 - 308 North Osceola Avenue
Flexible Development approval to increase the maximum permitted
height of attached dwellings from 50 feet to 150 feet in the
Downtown District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project.
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering
Architectural plans submitted by Harvard, Jolly, Clees & Toppe
1.07 acres; 46,609 square feet
155 feet of width by 167 feet of depth
Attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
CDB, Central Business District Classification
(Also governed by the Periphery Plan)
D, Downtown District
ADJACENT LAND USES: NOlih: Attached dwellings
West: Clearwater Bay
East: Social/public service agency (Salvation Army-planned
relocation)
South: Attached dwellings
Page 1
-
-
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: High-density residential and assorted commercial uses dominate the
immediate vicinity.
ANAL YSIS:
The rectangular site is 1.07 acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue,
approximately 200 feet north of Jones Street. The site is located within an older, residential
portion of the City located directly along Clearwater Bay. The site contains four, attached
dwellings with a total of 13 residential units. The buildings range in height between 17 and 24 feet
and between 1,000 and 2,800 square feet. The site is heavily wooded and has a steep slope running
west/east starting at sea level and rising to 27 feet at Osceola Avenue. The site is located within
the Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood.
The site was the subject of a previous Flexible Development application (FL 00-01-03) which
included additional parcels to the north (extending between Jones and Georgia Streets and from
North Osceola Avenue to the bay) totaling 3.24 acres. That proposal included a request to permit
150 attached dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with an increased height from 30 feet to 174
feet, and an increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre. The application also included a
request to permit a six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and
Georgia Street, and partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-of-way, from Jones
Street to Georgia Street. The application was tentatively approved by the CDB on June 20, 2000
pending legal acquisition of all subj ect parcels and the vacation and subsequent relocation of North
Osceola Avenue.
Due to acquisition difficulties, the development has been reduced in scale and includes the current,
smaller subject site. The previous application has been withdrawn and the current application
submitted in its place. The City Commission did not finalize the vacation of North Osceola
A venue.
The zoning district of the site at the time of the original application was HDR, High Density
Residential District. The City Commission changed the zoning to D, Downtown on April 19,
2001, in association with the adoption ofthe updated Periphery Plan. The Plan, an extension of the
City Redevelopment Plan, guides land use and densities in the downtown. The site is located
within the Northwest Periphery Area. The Periphery Plan designates the site as residential reuse
with multi-family townhomes and condominiums. Such development should be oriented toward
Clearwater Harbor and implement designs that respect these views. The maximum pemlitted
density, under the provisions of the Northwest Periphery Area, is 25 dwelling units per acre for
sites under two acres; such as this one acre site. It should be noted that the previous project
reviewed by the CDB enjoyed the higher density of 50 dwelling units per acre per the Periphery
Plan policies due to its size, in excess of 2 acres. The density bonus is intended to encourage the
consolidation of propeliies.
Page 2
-
e
The goal of the Northwest Periphery Area includes the encouragement of higher density,
residential development (primarily west of Osceola Avenue). Such development is encouraged to
take the form of townhomes and condominiums. Currently, pedestrian activity is limited due to
high traffic volume, narrow sidewalks and a lack of landscape buffering. New developments are
required to provide a more positive pedestrian experience.
The applicant seeks to increase the pennitted height of a building with attached dwellings from 50
feet to 150 feet. Attached dwellings under the Flexible Development provisions are permitted 100
feet in height. Buildings may reach 150 feet in height if they are located south of Drew Street,
West of North Myrtle Avenue and north ofComi Street. Because this site is north of Drew Street,
and the requested height is 150 feet, this is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect. The
proposal includes 25 attached dwellings within one building. The proposed building will be
located between 25 and 115 feet from any property line and 17 feet fi-om any surrounding
structure. Two levels of underground parking will be provided and will include 50 spaces that
exceeds Code requirements. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated
entrance/exit. There is an approximately lIS-foot condominium to the north of the subject site
and an approximately 80-foot condominium to the south.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, barrel tile roof,
and a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations. The terracotta color clay
roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates the
use of cupola-type enclosures. The design is similar to the previously approved architecture.
The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code. This includes a mixture of various trees,
shrubs, palms and annuals. The site will be enclosed by two types of fencing: a six-foot wrought-
iron style fence with masonry columns (located along the north and south property lines) and a six-
foot masonry wall with masonry columns (located along the east propeliy line). The color and
materials of the masonry portions of the fence and walls will match the proposed structure.
Amenities include a swimming pool along the harbor and tennis court near Osceola Avenue. The
underground parking will include storage space for the residents. There is an existing wood dock
and no new docks are included with this proposal. Any proposed docks will need to meet the
newly adopted requirements of Code or be reviewed by the Community Development Board. A
four-foot sidewalk will be provided along North Osceola Avenue to enhance pedestrian access in
the area.
The plan includes a reference to a retention pond located at the northwest comer of the site. The
application, however, did not include a sufficient grading plan or percolation tests to show that the
pond will recover within 24 hours of a stonn event. This information must be provided to satisfy
stormwater management criteria, prior to the issuance of any pennits, and the applicant is noticed
that this could adversely impact the site design. As provided in Section 4-406 of the Code, should
addressing stom1water issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one
approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board
for review. In addition, a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Depariment connections must
be installed on the exterior (street side) of a six-foot wall prior to issuance of a Celiificate of
Occupancy. The new assembly and connections must be placed on the n01ih side of the entry gate.
Page 3
e
-
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD
REQUIRED/ EXISTING
PERMITTED
25 dwelling units 13
(25 du/ac)
PROPOSED IN
COMPLIANCE?
25 dwelling Yes
uni ts
DENSITY
(dwelling units
er acre)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE D, DOWNTOWN DISTRICT:
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
HEIGHT N/A 17 - 24 feet 150 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING Detem1ined by 15 spaces 50 spaces Yes*
SP ACES the Community (2 per unit)
minimum Development
Coordinator
based on the
specific use
and/or ITE
Manual standards
The minimum development standards for attached dwellings are 1 - 1.5 parking spaces per
unit (25 - 38 spaces). The applicant has provided 50 spaces, exceeding the minimum
requirements of Code.
Page 4
e
-
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECTS IN THE D,
DOWNTOWN DISTRICT:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development standards.
The maximum height pennitted in the Downtown District is 150 feet provided that the
site is located along Clearwater Bay, is south of Drew Street, north of COUli Street and
west of Myrtle Avenue. The site meets all of these requirements with the exception of
being located 550 feet nOlih of Drew Street. The CDB approved a similar request for a
larger site on June 20, 2000. The previous application included two condominium towers
with a height of 174 feet and 150 dwelling units. The project has been scaled back in
scope to a smaller parcel and a single building of 150 feet in height with 25 units.
Height is measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes
steeply towards Clearwater Bay with a grade differential of 27 feet. With the slope, the
effective project height is 136 feet as viewed from Osceola Avenue. Overall, the
structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown District.
Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy mix of
uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $447,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $15,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the District.
The City of Clearwater pelmits attached dwelling uses. The site is currently zoned
Downtown (D) District, and the use is permitted within that classification. In addition,
residential uses are encouraged in this area by the Periphery Plan.
Page 5
e
It
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The adjacent building to the south (Belvedere
Apartments) is approximately 80 feet in height and farther to the north, north of Jones
Street, is an approximately 115-foot tall building (500 Osceola Avenue). The proposed
condominium complex is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the
waterfront and Clearwater Bay. It will aid in the revitalization of the downtown area.
This location provides a unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that
is currently underutilized.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses with the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The site is located in a residential area on the edge of central downtown Clearwater. The
site, uniquely located directly on Clearwater Bay, is within easy access to the major
north/south and east/west corridors within the City of Clearwater providing easy access to
and from all parts of the Tampa Bay area. There are no other sites within the City of
Clearwater available to accommodate the proposal along the harbor.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The attractive architecture, amenities and landscape design will set a
new standard for the area. It may be a catalytic project that influences other like
redevelopment efforts.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site. The current proposal,
similar to the previously approved version, incorporates well-ariiculated, unified
elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
Page 6
e
e
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District. The increase in height above the Flexible Development provision of
100 feet as requested will not be apparent along the street. Because of the topography of
the site, the underground parking will not be visible from Osceola Avenue.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The minimum requirement for attached dwellings in the D, Downtown District are
between 1 - 1.5 units per dwelling unit (25 to 38 spaces). The applicant is providing two
spaces per unit (50 spaces total) exceeding the minimum requirements.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, a terra
cotta, barrel tile roof, a significant number of windows and balconies, vertical columns
and flat arches. The terracotta color clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of
the mechanical equipment and incorporates the use of cupola-type enclosures. The
design of the building complies with the Downtown District design guidelines.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with modest single-family d\vellings and mid-rise attached
dwellings. The City's vision, however, as provided in the Periphery Plan includes a
revitalized, high-density residential area top support downtown businesses. This proposal
includes upscale condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive
redevelopment precedent for the area.
Page 7
-
e
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Downtown District and the proposed development will be in compliance
with that zoning classification. The proposed development will help generate a better mix
of residential uses and encourage the like redevelopment of other sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is pennitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood. The proposal includes parking and
landscaping in excess of Code requirements in addition to other on-site amenities.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue. The proposal includes razing all 13 existing dwelling units and providing 25
replacement units. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected
intersections or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the community
character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of a single building with attractive architecture,
well-designed landscaping and decorative fencing. There will be no adverse effects
generated by the proposed development.
Page 8
e
-
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 12, 2001. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to increase the permitted height from 50 feet to 150 feet for attached
dwellings in the Downtown District, as part of a Comprehensive rnfill Redevelopment Project for
the site at 304 - 308 North Osceola Avenue, with the following bases and conditions:
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Proj ect.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the sunounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or
as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density of the site be limited to 25 dwellings units;
3. That Stormwater Management requirements to be met in accordance with Code, pnor to
issuance of building permits;
4. That a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Department connections be installed on the
exterior (street side) of the proposed six-foot wall, prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy; and
5. That all sigI1age comply with Code.
,/1
Prepared by: Mark T. Pany, Plam1er r)/;';~
~.
A TT ACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlnnning Depnrtl1len/IC D BIFLEX\Pending ApplicationslOsceola North 302 Osceola Bay ClublOsceoln North 302 STAFF
REPORT doc
Page 9
DATE, TmE
FAX tllJ.,/ HAME
DURA T I iJt.j
PAI::iE (:3)
RESULT
MODE
I I
eRAt6MIS~3Imj \JERIFICATIOH F:EPOF~Te
I I
[18/13 1[1: [17
gl E,5D'3412214
[1[1: 27: Em
11=:
.-'
Of<:
ST AtmAF~D
EC~"
TIME [18/13/2[1[11 10:34
HAME F'LA~4
FAX 7275524575
TEL 7275524557
I
-
e
LL
o
>-
f-
u
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567
FAX (727) 562-4576
TO: ~lS.,,- ~l~^ - b5c-q~I-5S\L-
FAX: to'SO - q~ \ - L. L- \ Y.
FROM: ~ W-.
\
DATE: ~} I ~ \ c \
('ld'1) S\O~- Y~BL
MESSAGE:
~ ~L c9-;~ C-\J >5 -e.& "
Attached is a copy of the Agenda for the Community Development Board
Meeting of ~ ~ c \ as well as the staff
report for ~L.\ - ~ ~ . 0 S e,...e..c!> \~ Rv e.-.
PL.. 0 1-0 c..,.. ~ . 4-- r-~~ ;, k.... P&"-f\ ....~
~ r-~" Q. ~+C-& .
~.
Number of Pages (Including Cover): ~
e
e
LL
Revised 8/1 % 1
o
>-
f-
u
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Date: Tuesday, August 21,2001
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor,
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
(City Hall Commission Chambers)
The City of Clearwater strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA). Please advise us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special
accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. Kindly refrain from using beepers,
cellular telephones and other distracting devices during the meeting.
Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this Board must have a
record of the proceedings to support such appeal.
CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Chair Figurski
Vice-Chair Petersen
Gildersleeve
Hooper
Moran
Mazur
Plisko
Alternate member Hibbard
City Staff
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: July 17,2001
B. REQUESTS FOR CONTINUANCES/RECONSIDERATION: None
C. RECONSIDERED ITEM: None
CDB agenda - August 2 L 2001 - Page 1
-
e
D. LEVEL 3 APPLICATIONS:
1. Case: ANX 01-06-12 - 3011 Virginia Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Mr. Taylor G. Bingham III.
Location: 0.11 acres on the southwest comer of Meadow Lark Lane and Virginia
Avenue.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.11 acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from RU, Residential Urban (County) to RU, Residential
Urban Classification (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from R-3, Residential Single-Family District (County) to LMDR, Low
Medium Density Residential District (Clearwater).
Proposed Use: A single-family dwelling.
Presenter: Etim S. Udoh, Senior Planner.
2. Case: Text Amendment - TA 01-07-03
Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department.
Request: Amendments to the Community Development Code regarding notice
requirements for continuances, adding provisions requiring neighborhoods to conduct a
vote on each development standard proposed as part of a Neighborhood Conservation
Overlay District, as well as provisions specifying procedures for amending or eliminating
requirements of such districts, and eliminating the percentage of development rights that
may be transfelTed from a site.
Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager.
E. LEVEL 2 APPLICATIONS:
1. Case: FL 01-05-22 - 2652 McMullen Booth Road
Owner(s)/Applicant: City National Bank of Florida, Trustee.
Location: 15.7 acre located on the southwest comer of Allen Avenue and McMullen
Booth Road.
Zoning: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to pennit a six-foot high fence with gate in the
required front setback along McMullen Booth Road.
Proposed Use: A six-foot high ornamental, perimeter fence/gate as part of an existing
multi - family development.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Plalmer.
CDB agenda - August 21,2001 - Pa.ge 2
e
e
2. Case: FL 01-06-23 - 211 - 217 Dolphin Point
Owner/Applicant: Houle Industries, Inc.
Location: 0.37 acres located on the south side of Dolphin Point, approximately 550 feet
west of Larboard Way.
Zoning: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot width from 150 feet
to 125 feet, reduce the front (north) setback along Dolphin Point from 25 feet to four feet,
reduce the rear (south) setback from 15 feet to zero feet and to increase the height from
30 feet to 50 feet, as part of a Residential Infill Project.
Proposed Use: A nine-unit condominium building.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
3. Case: FL 01-06-25 - 304-308 North Osceola Avenue
Owners: Malcom Croft, Beverley Croft, Bennett Weber and Harriett Weber.
Applicant: Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
Location: 1.07 acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, approximately
200 feet north of Jones Street.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the height of an attached dwelling
development from 50 feet to 150 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Proj ect.
Proposed Use: A 25-unit condominium development.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
F. DIRECTOR'S ITEMS:
G. ADJOURNMENT
S:IPlanning Depm1men/IC D Blagendas DRC & CDBICDBI2001108 Augus/ICDB agenda 8-21-200l.doc
CDB agenda - August 21. 2001 - Page 3
-
e
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
August 21,2001
FL 01-06-25
E3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ST AFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
LOCATION:
304 - 308 North Osceola Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to increase the maximum permitted
height of attached dwellings from 50 feet to 150 feet in the
Downtown District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Proj eet.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering
Architectural plans submitted by Harvard, Jolly, Clees & Toppe
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1.07 acres; 46,609 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
155 feet of width by 167 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CDB, Central Business District Classification
(Also governed by the Periphery Plan)
ZONING DISTRICT:
D, Downtown District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Clearwater Bay
East: Social/public service agency (Salvation Army-planned
relocation)
South: Attached dwellings
Page 1
e
e
CHARACTER OF THE
nvIlVIEDIATE VICINITY: High-density residential and assorted commercial uses dominate the
immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
The rectangular site is 1.07 acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue,
approximately 200 feet nOlih of Jones Street. The site is located within an older, residential
portion of the City located directly along Clearwater Bay. The site contains four, attached
dwellings with a total of 13 residential units. The buildings range in height between 17 and 24 feet
and between 1,000 and 2,800 square feet. The site is heavily wooded and has a steep slope mmling
west/east starting at sea level and rising to 27 feet at Osceola Avenue. The site is located within
the Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood.
The site was the subject of a previous Flexible Development application (FL 00-01-03) which
included additional parcels to the north (extending between Jones and Georgia Streets and from
North Osceola Avenue to the bay) totaling 3.24 acres. That proposal included a request to permit
150 attached dwellings, as a Residential Infill Proj ect, with an increased height from 30 feet to 174
feet, and an increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre. The application also included a
request to permit a six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and
Georgia Street, and partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-of-way, from Jones
Street to Georgia Street. The application was tentatively approved by the CDB on June 20, 2000
pending legal acquisition of all subject parcels and the vacation and subsequent relocation of North
Osceola Avenue.
Due to acquisition difficulties, the development has been reduced in scale and includes the current,
smaller subject site. The previous application has been withdrawn and the current application
submitted in its place. The City Commission did not finalize the vacation of North Osceola
A venue.
The zoning district of the site at the time of the original application was HDR, High Density
Residential District. The City Commission changed the zoning to D, Downtown on April 19,
2001, in association with the adoption of the updated Periphery Plan. The Plan, an extension of the
City Redevelopment Plan, guides land use and densities in the downtown. The site is located
within the Northwest Periphery Area. The Periphery Plan designates the site as residential reuse
with multi-family townhomes and condominiums. Such development should be oriented toward
Clearwater Harbor and implement designs that respect these views. The maximum permitted
density, under the provisions of the Northwest Periphery Area, is 25 dwelling units per acre for
sites under two acres; such as this one acre site. It should be noted that the previous project
reviewed by the CDB enjoyed the higher density of 50 dwelling units per acre per the Periphery
Plan policies due to its size, in excess of 2 acres. The density bonus is intended to encourage the
consolidation of properties.
Page 2
e
--
The goal of the Northwest Periphery Area includes the encouragement of higher density,
residential development (primarily west of Osceola Avenue). Such development is encouraged to
take the form of townhomes and condominiums. Currently, pedestrian activity is limited due to
high traffic volume, narrow sidewalks and a lack of landscape buffering. New developments are
required to provide a more positive pedestrian experience.
The applicant seeks to increase the permitted height of a building with attached dwellings from 50
feet to 150 feet. Attached dwellings under the Flexible Development provisions are permitted 100
feet in height. Buildings may reach 150 feet in height if they are located south of Drew Street,
West of North Myrtle Avenue and north of Court Street. Because this site is north of Drew Street,
and the requested height is 150 feet, this is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The
proposal includes 25 attached dwellings within one building. The proposed building will be
located between 25 and 115 feet from any property line and 17 feet from any surrounding
structure. Two levels of underground parking will be provided and will include 50 spaces that
exceeds Code requirements. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola A venue at a gated
entrance/exit. There is an approximately lIS-foot condominium to the north of the subject site
and an approximately 80-foot condominium to the south.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, barrel tile roof,
and a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations. The terracotta color clay
roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates the
use of cupola-type enclosures. The design is similar to the previously approved architecture.
The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code. This includes a mixture of various trees,
shrubs, palms and annuals. The site will be enclosed by two types of fencing: a six-foot wrought-
iron style fence with masonry columns (located along the north and south property lines) and a six-
foot masonry wall with masonry columns (located along the east property line). The color and
materials ofthe masonry portions ofthe fence and walls will match the proposed structure.
Amenities include a swimming pool along the harbor and tennis court near Osceola Avenue. The
underground parking will include storage space for the residents. There is an existing wood dock
and no new docks are included with this proposal. Any proposed docks will need to meet the
newly adopted requirements of Code or be reviewed by the Community Development Board. A
four-foot sidewalk will be provided along North Osceola Avenue to enhance pedestrian access in
the area.
The plan includes a reference to a retention pond located at the northwest comer of the site. The
application, however, did not include a sufficient grading plan or percolation tests to show that the
pond will recover within 24 hours of a storm event. This information must be provided to satisfy
stormwater management criteria, prior to the issuance of any permits, and the applicant is noticed
that this could adversely impact the site design. As provided in Section 4-406 of the Code, should
addressing stormwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one
approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board
for review. In addition, a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Department connections must
be installed on the exterior (street side) of a six-foot wall prior to issuance of a Ceriificate of
Occupancy. The new assembly and connections must be placed on the north side of the entry gate.
Page 3
e
e
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS
There are no outstanding enfurcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD
REQUIRED/ EXISTING
PERMITTED
25 dwelling units 13
(25 du/ac)
PROPOSED IN
COMPLIANCE?
25 dwelling Yes
units
DENSITY
(dwelling units
er acre)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE D, DOWNTOWN DISTRICT:
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
HEIGHT N/A 1 7 - 24 feet 150 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING Determined by 15 spaces 50 spaces Yes*
SP ACES the Community (2 per unit)
minimum Development
Coordinator
based on the
specific use
and/or ITE
Manual standards
The minimum development standards for attached dwellings are 1 ~ 1.5 parking spaces per
unit (25 - 38 spaces). The applicant has provided 50 spaces, exceeding the minimum
requirements of Code.
Page 4
e
e
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECTS IN THE D,
DOWNTOWN DISTRICT:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development standards.
The maximum height permitted in the Downtown District is 150 feet provided that the
site is located along Clearwater Bay, is south of Drew Street, north of Court Street and
west of Myrtle Avenue. The site meets all of these requirements with the exception of
being located 550 feet north of Drew Street. The CDB approved a similar request for a
larger site on June 20, 2000. The previous application included two condominium towers
with a height of 174 feet and 150 dwelling units. The project has been scaled back in
scope to a smaller parcel and a single building of 150 feet in height with 25 units.
Height is measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes
steeply towards Clearwater Bay with a grade differential of 27 feet. With the slope, the
effective project height is 136 feet as viewed from Osceola Avenue. Overall, the
structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown District.
Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy mix of
uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $447,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $15,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the District.
The City of Clearwater pennits attached dwelling uses. The site is currently zoned
Downtown (D) District, and the use is permitted within that classification. In addition,
residential uses are encouraged in this area by the Periphery Plan.
Page 5
-
e
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive InfiU Redevelopment Project are
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adj acent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The adjacent building to the south (Belvedere
Apartments) is approximately 80 feet in height and farther to the north, north of Jones
Street, is an approximately 115-foot tall building (500 Osceola Avenue). The proposed
condominium complex is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the
waterfront and Clearwater Bay. It will aid in the revitalization of the downtown area.
This location provides a unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that
is currently underutilized.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses with the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The site is located in a residential area on the edge of central downtown Clearwater. The
site, uniquely located directly on Clearwater Bay, is within easy access to the major
north/south and east/west corridors within the City of Clearwater providing easy access to
and from all parts of the Tampa Bay area. There are no other sites within the City of
Clearwater available to accommodate the proposal along the harbor.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The attractive architecture, amenities and landscape design will set a
new standard for the area. It may be a catalytic project that influences other like
redevelopment efforts.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site. The current proposal,
similar to the previously approved version, incorporates well-articulated, unified
elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
Page 6
e
e
8. Flexibiiity in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District. The increase in height above the Flexible Development provision of
100 feet as requested will not be apparent along the street. Because of the topography of
the site, the underground parking will not be visible from Osceola A venue.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The minimum requirement for attached dwellings in the D, Downtown District are
between 1 - 1.5 units per dwelling unit (25 to 38 spaces). The applicant is providing two
spaces per unit (50 spaces total) exceeding the minimum requirements.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, a terra
cotta, barrel tile roof, a significant number of windows and balconies, vertical columns
and flat arches. The terracotta color clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of
the mechanical equipment and incorporates the use of cupola-type enclosures. The
design ofthe building complies with the Downtown District design guidelines.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise attached
dwellings. The City's vision, however, as provided in the Periphery Plan includes a
revitalized, high-density residential area top support downtown businesses. This proposal
includes upscale condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive
redevelopment precedent for the area.
Page 7
-
e
2. The proposed deveiopment wiH not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Downtown District and the proposed development will be in compliance
with that zoning classification. The proposed development will help generate a better mix
of residential uses and encourage the like redevelopment of other sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood. The proposal includes parking and
landscaping in excess of Code requirements in addition to other on-site amenities.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue. The proposal includes razing all 13 existing dwelling units and providing 25
replacement units. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected
intersections or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the community
character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of a single building with attractive architecture,
well-designed landscaping and decorative fencing. There will be no adverse effects
generated by the proposed development.
Page 8
-
e
SUMMARY AND RECOlVIlVIENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 12, 2001. The Planning Depmiment recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to increase the permitted height from 50 feet to 150 feet for attached
dwellings in the Downtown District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for
the site at 304 - 308 North Osceola Avenue, with the following bases and conditions:
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or
as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density of the site be limited to 25 dwellings units;
3. That Stormwater Management requirements to be met in accordance with Code, pnor to
issuance of building permits;
4. That a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Department connections be installed on the
exterior (street side) of the proposed six-foot wall, prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy; and
5. That all signage comply with Code.
/r.r~7 ..._~_'___.~,,_,,__ _ T'.--'
Prepared by: Mark T. Parry, Planner r)/"..----
,
-/-//
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlanning Departlllel1tlC 0 BlFLE).1Pendil1g Applicntiol1sl0sceola Norrh 302 Osceola Bay ClublOsceoln North 302 STAFF
REPORTdoc
Page 9
e
-
NORTHSiDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
POND
JOB NUMBER:
VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)=
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. =
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. =
UNDERDRAIN INVERT =
K=
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN =
2,736
5.50
3.00
2.00
0.09 (FT./MIN.)
35
POND AREA (SF) =
POND AREA (SF) =
1,700
1 ,456
ELEV. TOTAL INCR L(AV) HG FILTER FLOW POND INCR INCR
FT HEAD HEAD (FT) AREA (CFM) AREA VOL. TIME
5.50 1,700
2.94 0.63 2.75 1.07 53 5.05 1,043 207
4.88 1,639
2.31 0.63 2.75 0.84 53 3.97 1,005 253
4.25 1,578
1.69 0.63 2.75 0.61 53 2.90 967 334
3.63 1,517
1.06 0.63 2.75 0.39 53 1.83 929 509
3.00 1,456
TIME=
TIME=
1,302 MINUTES
21.7 HOURS
rQ)r r:e; (;~
In;!
, Ii "j
. " \
.-! '-I
~._~~.',-
PLANNiNG? DEvEU
en OF CLi:>,'
'e 1"1 ~\r, C'-r''\l
L~~ t.: \~_. '-' H
";1
Il
~ 'j
"
(
,
. ' ~r'/
!\j
/t~v
Cl' ',~'L,J,iO\
\''---';:--;, "", 1/;,\," II I "
" J'V "" Cl V
'\ /1 \; ", \ l"
I} j l-
f/ '" ,I
J
'i
_.~J ~
Northsille
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Date:
August 9, 2001
To:
City of Clearwater
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida
Attention:
Lisa Fierce
From:
Gary A. Boucher, P.E.
Reference:
Osceola Bay Condominium
NES Comm. #0129
We Transmit: (X) Enclosed () Under Separate Cover
( ) Mail ( ) UPS Overnight
( ) Pick-up (X) Courier
(X)Per Your Request (X) For Your Review & Comment
() For Your Use (X) For Your Approval
( ) For Your Files ( ) For Your Information
Copies
15
Descri tion
Civil Site Plans (15 sheets each)
I Underdrain Calculations
Date
09/09/01
09/09/01
^'
.)
-I
e
".
. .
.
.
( ) Originals
(X) Prints
( ) Addendum
( ) Shop Drawings
( ) Specifications
( )Applications
( ) Floppy Disk
I
III
I
Per your discussion with Kenneth ,Roush.,;
'..... . ...../7 . /.../
'J "1./
r-h/. /~/ i' \-:7 /,k:~
By: '.. "l..v~L ' "t>\...-
Gary A. B9upher, P .E.
Comments:
Copies To: File
727 . 443 . 2869 FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
..~.
~~.'~.etOf ~ 11." ~"ll"'.J---.%_;."
.~ " ." It" ~
"'''''''''1' "',
i:~!U'-''''' .' '....
'~'::;i
'IfIO>,,~~_~
.~...~~....~.....-,
e
-
NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
POND DRA WDOWN ANALYSIS
PROJECT: OSCEOLA BAY CLUB
POND
JOB NUMBER:
VOLUME PROVIDED (CF)=
BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. =
BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. =
UNDERDRAIN INVERT =
K=
LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN =
2,736
5.50
3.00
2.00
0.09 (FT./MIN.)
35
POND AREA (SF) =
POND AREA (SF) =
1,700
1 ,456
ELEV. TOTAL INCR L(AV) HG FILTER FLOW POND INCR INCR
FT HEAD HEAD (FT) AREA (CFM) AREA VOL TIME
5.50 1,700
2.94 0.63 2.75 1.07 53 5.05 1,043 207
4.88 1,639
2.31 0.63 2.75 0.84 53 3.97 1,005 253
4.25 1,578
1.69 0.63 2.75 0.61 53 2.90 967 334
3.63 1,517
1.06 0.63 2.75 0.39 53 1.83 929 509
3.00 1 ,456
TIME=
TIME =
1,302 MINUTES
21.7 HOURS
t(".../~.
f^l/
a ' . !
( ". ....". 1 ';J. \ l' ~Cl\ c
-~ (vI..
I' _ \
" -\,'
\
v
~I - rc; .n~" r~nCi "\. .'::, ,"", '.'~.C'~',
In~ IC'iF1.L,!f ,,'
U '-=' '-=--' L.:::J LI L.; I.:..,
, r _.~'-,. ..
i i
i r I I
uUL
PLANNiFi-', DEVELC.'
CI"~:..:JF CLEAH
Fal~
.
-
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Carrier, AI
Wednesday, August 08,2001 9:55 AM
Miller, Tom; Parry, Mark; Fierce, Lisa
Quillen, Michael; Barkel", Brian; Maran, Robert; Shoberg, Elliot
FW: Osceola Bay Club
Importance:
High
The site plan as submitted is lacking a sufficient gmding plan (tennis courts and pmking gmage at same elevation), means
of garage/tennis water getting to pond, treatment pond depicted v'll bottom elev. and of bank, pei"colation test signed
and sealed by a professional engineer, drawdowil calculations and outfall control structure detail,.etc.etc.etc.
Thanks A.C.
x4761
-----Original Message-----
From: Shoberg, Elliot E.
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Carrier, AI
Subject: FW: Osceola Bay Club
Importance: High
-----Original Message-----
From: Parry, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Barker, Brian A; Shoberg, Elliot E.; Melone, Donald; Maran, Robert (Bob)
Subject: Osceola Bay Club
Importance: High
.....,.
This is an excerpt from the staff report - are you guys ok with this or should we change it? The blue part is a question from
Lisa and myself.
"The plan includes a retention pond located at the northwest comer of the site. The application, however, did not
include percolation tests to show that the pond wi]] recover within 24 hours of a StOIllI event. This information
must be provided to satisfy stormwater management criteria, prior to the issuance of any permits. As provided in
Section 4-406 ofthe Code, should addressing stollllwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly
different from the one approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the
Board for review. II
D..? we l~_~~ to tlnalize this prio2:!~~~P~~~="lYr,-ljor or mini~II~I]~!~Slil~j{t3t~0Iation?
[ (9( IWt + if y1)Jc(( b-,-" ~L,~ 3-~~-j
f/ iio#Jt.{o Ck/ ec/ IlL (/L0i1 f; tk. ::;: ,Jp (<<2fJV"--t ;C'j l. (i.~17c~
..!7 . _
c? f; LeD
.=1> (Jrv\ ci l'-~-Q/&0
c; ,.' I
Jc(iJ {r~
)
!. '
t'./l, 1-<", I" . " I" ({ (;~.: t/l 4 .
1"1) '-Z---- /-- V-/~" -
i
il
~0tl\/f'LV~
~Le~"\. tv
CU'!A/l V)
c: k (2/1 /-ft<-:)
--I ~ /). '1 I
ru( l~ ./ '.((/-c k\.'j
U
(ctT
r, / t i //;. .-( Cf"\,.'
-\::.L _0 .
"7
( .
-)1
Northsille
.
.
.
.
July 30,2001
Mr. Mark Parry
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, Florida 33758
Reference:
Osceola Bay Condominium
Subject:
Your Fax of Today
Dear Mark:
This letter addresses the points raised in your fax to J OaIme Fuchs.
1. Number of Buildings = 4
Height, Stories, Floor Areas,
302 Osceola = 17 ft., 1, 1406 sq. ft.
304 Osceola = 24 ft., 2, 1544 sq.ft.
308 Osceola (Front) = 23 ft., 2, 2846 sq.ft.
308 Osceola (Rear) = 22 ft., 2,1012 sq.ft.
2. Number of Units in Each Building:
302 Osceola = 2
304 Osceola = 3
308 Osceola (Front) = 6
308 Osceola (Rear) = 2
3. 13
4. Shown on Sheet C3.l.
5. Yes.
6. Screened on 4 sides, open above.
7. 15, as indicated on Sheet C 1.1.
Thank you for your attention to the success of this proj ect.
V e:ry )/ruly Yours,
N>, THS~E E~~;IVN~ SERVICI,S, INC.
, ~14~~~~-:,~
Kenneth H. Roush, P .E.
KHR:de
FAX 727 . 446 . 8036
--
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S MYRTLE AVE.
POBOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748
OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567
FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576
e
TO:
,I()-,,~1ln.9FJJ.Qb~;_..M a1rix.
FAX#:
469,~_~QQ
FROM:
Mark T. Parry, Planning and Develo~ment Services, City of Clearwater
DATE:
J'yIQg~1'lY,_L~~hJfL~j1Ql
.-r .,~..
\
MESSAGE:
JoAnne,
I requested the following information to be submitted at the DRC meeting in June. I really need
to have today in order to finish my staff report.
1. Number, size (in square feet), height/stories of dwellings existing on the site (please also let
me know which one is which - i.e. locate them so I can find them on the survey);
2. Number of units in each building;
3. Total number of existing dwelling units;
4. Linear distance that the proposed building will be from adjacent buildings;
5. Will there be a gated entrance?;
6. Will rooftop, mounted equipment be enclosed?; and
7. Existing number of parking spaces.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558.
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): One (1)
e
e
r'T
\....J 1
r.-; "' T
1 r
OF
r T T"'l ... ~ -';-';1'1' ... ~
'-.J L n l\.. K W l\.. 1
ER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
July 23,2001
Ms. Joanne Fuchs
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 240
Clearwater, FL 33755
~ ._'~r: '4 ~', t:: r~~ I {"~~:li
.E' tH~?_~~~
RE: Community Development Board Meeting (FL .Ql-Ofl!?5)__
Dear Ms. Fuchs:
The application that you submitted for property located at 302 North Osceola Avenue has
been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on August 21,
2001.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of
City Hall at 112 S. Osceola, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4558.
Sincerely yours,
)
/ f
I' "/,,, ,,' " ~.,..,........"
i--fl._....
, .f
Mark T. Parry
Planner
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXIReviewed and PendinglOsceola North 302 Osceola Bay CIllblOsceola North 302 cdb
letter. doc
Bl{IAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR.Cml~\ISSIONER
ED HAir!', VICE JvlAYOR-CO:\I.\lIS."IONER \\hHTf\EY G10\Y. CO.\l~IISSIChER
HOYT HA\llI.TON, CO~IMlS"[OI'EI{ r.~ BiI.I.]oI'SO;\. C:omIISSIO;-':ER
IY;g
"EQUAL E:\!P!.OYW'0:T A"!D AFFIR,\L-\TIVE ACTIOi\ E\lPI.O\l:R"
--
e
'.,;Ii
'.1Jl
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
CASE #: 1=UI-...t: ~}-
DATE RECEIVED: 7-l'..'}.jl
RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ,.f'
ATLAS PAGE#: 'PW
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: c;..t:>~
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH: 1:)
SOUTH: I
WEST: '
EAST: ~
()
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
~ Clearwater
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01)
~PLEASE TYPE ORPRlNT~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: _OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: _601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 240 CLEARWATER, FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: 727/469-8838
FAX NUMBER: 727/469-8800
AGENT NAME:
JOANNE FUCHS
CITYOFCLEARV7ER :H~:~l
PROPERTY OWNER(S): _MALCOLM CROFT, BEVERLY CROFT, BENNETT WEBER
(Must include ALL owners)
MAILING ADDRESS: _601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 240, CLEARWATER FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: 727/469-8838
FAX NUMBER: _727/469-8800
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
STREET ADDRESS: 302-308 OSCEOLA AVENUE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _SEE ATTACHED
PARCEL NUMBER: _09/29/15/53370/000/0010 AND 0020, 09/29/15/00000/430/0600
PARCEL SIZE:
1.07 ACRES, 46,615 SQ. FT.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
25 DWELLING UNITS
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _SECTION 2-903B.1.a. ALLOW PARCEL TO BE DEVELOPED AS ATTACHED DWELLINGS;
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
SECTION 2-903B.1.c. INCREASE MAX HEIGHT TO 150 FEET
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO XXXX (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
r
e
-
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
~LTHOUGH THE AREA IS CHARACTERIZED WITH MODEST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MID-RISE ATTACHED DWELLINGS, THE
CITY'S VISION IN THE 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE INCLUDES A REVITALIZED, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXTENSION OF DOWN-
TOWN. THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES 25 HIGH END CONDOMINIUMS WITH AMENITIES. IT WILL HOPEFULLY ESTABLISH A POSITIVE
REDEVELOPMENT PRECEDENT FOR THE AREA.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
_THE SITE IS ZONED DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ZONING
CLASSIFICATION. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL GENERATE AND ENCOURAGE A BETTER MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND
PEDESTRIAN USES, THEREBY INCREASING THE VALUE OF ADJACENT LAND AND BUILDINGS.
3. The proposed development will not adverseiy affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS A HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY THAT WILL NOT AFFECT THE HEALTH OR SAFETY
OF PERSONS RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE AN INGRESS/EGRESS POINT OF ACCESS FROM OSCEOLA AVENUE. VEHICLE
TRIP GENERATION WILL NOT HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON AFFECTED INTERSECTIONS OR ROADWAYS, WITH NO REDUCTION
IN LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ON ANY ROADS.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for deveiopment.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH AND WILL RAISE THE STANDARDS OF THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER
OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visuai, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
_THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONE BUILDING WITH VIEW CORRIDORS ON EITHER SIDE. THERE WILL BE
NO ADVERSE EFFECTS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for deveiopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
_THE LAND USE OF THE SITE IS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD). THE MAX HEIGHT IN THE D DISTRICT IS 150 FEET. HEIGHT
IS MEASURED FROM THE MEAN ELEVATION (14 FEET) OF EXISTING GRADE. THE SITE SLOPES STEEPLY TO CLW HARBOR WITH A
GRADE DIFFERENTIAL OF 27 FEET. THE STRUCTURE, SITE PLAN AND DESIGN ARE CONSISTENT W/INTENT OF D DISTRICT.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infi!1 project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL STABILIZE AND LIKELY RAISE THE MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTIES IN THE AREA.
THE CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE OF THE SITE IS $447,100. WITH REDEVELOPMENT, ASSESSED VALUE PROJECTED AT $15M.
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
It
.
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
_ATTACHED DWELLINGS ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT AND 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
~DJACENT LAND USES ARE PREDOMINANTLY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL. MANY OF THE STRUCTURES ARE MID-RISE ATTACHED
DWELLINGS. THE PROPOSED CONDO COMPLEX IS SPECIFICALLY GEARED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE VIEWS OF THE HARBOR
AND WATERFRONT. IT IS ALSO INTENDED TO AID IN THE REVITALIZATION OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
_THIS LOCATION PROVIDES A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO REDEVELOP A PORTION OF CLEARWATER HARBOR THAT IS
CURRENTLY UNDERUTILlZED, AND IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES DESCRIBED IN THE 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
_ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS A KEY COMPONENT TO THE SUCCESS OF THE DOWNTOWN. THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT WILL PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE CONTINUING REVITALIZATION OF DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER. THE
PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY IMPOVE THE SITE.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
_THE CITY WILL BENEFIT BY HAVING AN ATTRACTIVE BUILDING COMPLEX IN A REDEVELOPING AREA.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AESTHETICALLY IMPROVE THE IMMEDIATE AREA AND CLEARWATER AS A WHOLE.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT REFLECTS THE CITY'S VISION OF URBAN CHARACTER WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
_SHARED PARKING IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ON-STREET PARKING OF VISITORS IS NOT REQUIRED.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EMPHASIZES HARMONY WITHIITS SURROUNDINGS AND REFLECTS ON THE CITY'S HISTORIC
BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
-
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
D SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (Including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
D COpy OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
D PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
D LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
D TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
D GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
D SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 0'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
D SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including ail paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
D REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 y" X 11) and color rendering if possible;
D FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structurai setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
-
-
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed iandscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and iabeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y, X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced sign age proposal (8 Y, X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize Ci representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in his application.
~
.L-
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS J.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~ day of
~ I.4l'4, ,A.D. 20~ to me and/or by
.:rCl4~ "of.. ,:'i.4.c.lo,,$ , who is lP'8rsonally knS3 has
produced N A as
identification.
Not~jJ(9-~~~
My expire,,: ~.'.s; ~O.3
)~'- J. 7J;:::'; - ',- !_--_ ~:~...,,).:..-~I: h
- \'~~~'f
IW,1,
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
.
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Ciearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
S:\Plannmg Department\AppllcatlOn Forms\development revlew\comprehenslV8 mflll appl/catlOn2.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.,' " '1"'ll H\H 'CJ 1.. \J ~.
. l\\'\"m/\ vrn () f\lh ..' J 1I\'l\\~
',/ PLANN1N(;' & UE,V1UJ)PMKN'1' S'RI\ TIC~ A1)M1Nl~r\'\L\\ \IN
MONIClf'Al. SRRVlCllS }HJlillINO, JoO SOUTH. MYIUlJ; ,\ VFJ;UE, 2~\ t"lO()!(
---.- P~NE ~~~~3.:l~()7 _~!\~..QP) 56':-4.'i7~_.__.__.__
S T A no: OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF P'NELLM
Mal c 0 1111 C J' () f t
B~\'erly Croft
---....,.-.- -~,_._-~ - ~_. -_._'--,~......~.---. ".- '
--..,--. -,-'---" ---~ -'-. ---
(Name ort IIll Pl"lIperty owners)
'~'---"" -'--r--~__..._..~____._ '.------.--r..:-. ___'_----""--__-______- __~___ ~__.
1. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s} and record title ho!d8r(S) ur the following de.$cribed prop6rty,
AD()~l:3S o~ GfNERAl, lOCATlON_~---2.Q_ 4 - 3 ~_ 0 s C el},l!:l._..J:l..Y e,___________. __.__ ___________
(N<lIUI6 1)1 '~l)ltIl)
'-'-"- ----------.-....>-----...---.... _w.__ ..._____..-,.-..~_________.,.--.__. ___. .__........._______-......___-.
._.......~,- - '.".-.---...-
--. -',*,-",-
.--'.----.----...,.... ---------.- -------_..-------..._-_.~--- .---~ ._---_.~
------- --.
-----.--.
----- '.--------....--..--...
2, That this property oonstitutes the property for which &1 roquast for a:
Residential Development
-----.--......__...----.. --~.
~~_..._-... --,.. ....._.~...---..~--- '~"'--- -
.-. .........-.... ~...- ----~,.----.-
~_.._.~-~-- --------'.- ---- .---..---_. --_.~
3 That the llfldersignsd (haslhave) appointed and (do~s/do) appcin~ _
--- - ,_I~ i c h a r ~ T t' e !--.!..--2..Lg-:>-~~_9J, ~ Bay L) ll!; tQ.U.Jl.U: n t _. ____
Uli (t1tQl\~lr) ~flnt(fl) 10 b'IIet~. Any pt!Ju...~1I <if ~r t10cLllntntll n~wy 16 at'T..-:t ~-nl ~1~lltl,
.---.----...... ~.-----
._-'4...------._. _ ~ _ "'_U_'_
H'.\f ~hig affidavit has bettn exewled 10 induce the City of Clearwatar. flOrida to oO(l~,i,k,',.(,.1 ;jet
(J[, i1 It~ above described property;
-.'..-......--"-'-------------.---. .-- .-------. .--~-_.~
C J G ~n: D (P, PpM1y 0M.0",
- ---/.dd ~~__,_
~1IXpII"': So tt '(L I hJ r-'
ALLEN T'r"'l""':"'_" JRS'~:
,', ' I il~t...;.. ''''" "..Il
SOLlCITonS
MED'vVAY Ho.USi!
18-22 CANTElLUpeAOAP
EAST GRINSTEAD, \N, SUS~X
' RH19,tJ8,J ., ,"
Tel: 01 342 :J23:;c~1 / 2~ 5B1'7
([))L3.002C'::':. .'_:'," ,-" ~.: ~::-:TCAO)
..
'/",
.
. ..... .c_<.C,,; '.L .,.,.Li',...c...:......., "'J.l!.;L:':'; ;;:.~...,.<tl;;&r:I\i....-'"--
"!liL.ClUny, FLORIDA
. Prepared by and return to:
FREEDOM TITLE AGENCY, INC.
635 Cleveland St., Suite C
Clearwater, FL 33755
2\:147326 04-~2COO 10:59:51 Hit:
51 OCD-Wilro.K OO1/BEl1ETT ImR
OCOOOCOOOO
In: Bl<:
RECORDIHG 002 PrlIS
DOC STAMP - DR21~
!}lG:
1
3.
.I~
ics ,p-
"
A.IlT
, Wi
OO-11~S94 APR-20-2000 10:~9~
PIHELLRS CO 8K 10884 PO 2359
I..........
TOTAl:
p emx rfiT.lrnfiRED:
DWff:
liY ~~ OCPUTY [lE~
- ~ ~ P\~erty Appraisers Pared Identification Number:
fl21g ;i lJ. 09/29/15/53370/000/0010
09/29/15/00000/430/0600
WARRANTY DEED
i~' . a antY..Deed,iJ!fade(tbe,.J4:.day.of "..{JPt2.u....., - 2a7ro .. by OSCEOLA, BAY., 'It-. '. ,...
\i.,. ......_......, J. t... . f .-
", ., a orida CorporatIon, hereinafter called the GRANTOR, to MALCOLM CROFf and
, BEVERLEY CROFf, Husband and Wife, as to an Eighty (80%) Percent interest, and
BENNETT WEBER and HARRIETT WEBER, Husband and Wife, as to a Twenty (20%)
Percent interest, whose post office address is /" 11. .f-
c(o B Wr:6ef!. tdJl /f\I~S71!;1tL l!.~frD ,l.A'Tl!tS",ADc ,~EiR.:~.y. USA
hereinafter called the GRANTEES:
(~USCCI hemn \he lc1mI "GRANTOR' Uld "GRANTEE' include ,II \he parties 10 'hi, i_ Uld ,he hci,.,lcpJ~'" Uld....p" or
indi.;duab. Uld \he...:ccuan anoj....p" or cocpantiana)
WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum ofS10.00
and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknow ledged, hereby grants,
bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the GRANTEES all that
certain land in Pinellas County, State of Florida, to-wit:
SEE EXHIBIT "An ATIACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appunenances thereto belonging
or in anywise appertaining.
'..~
-r-. ~'.~~,'
'i;" . T~? HA. VE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee, simple forever.
'~~'>:'~"~:'I--!---".~:''''''-'' -
AND the GRANTOR hereby covenantswith'said GRANTEES that the GRAN lOR is
lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful' ....
authority to sell and convey said land; that the GRANTOR hereby fully warrants title to said land
and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land
is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, /9 Cfj .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said GRANTOR has signed and sealed these presents the
day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
~~
Witness
Printed Name: "'" -Jr ~
~~
J
t' ::r A c... \c.So N
:::tt.~.~
B erley Croft
Its President
. Witness
'. PrintedN~~.:.
...... .....
:;(, ;
8T ATE OF ~ W ES:.i J\,~,,,cn=,'?C
COUNTYO '?'Nc..~v \..(..K.'
~,..:;;...w_ The.foregoing.instrument was acknowledged before me this ~%ay of_~'
p",,' - ~t'- ,~, by Beverley Croft, President of Osceola Bay, Inc., a Florida
Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. She is personally known to me or has produced
:D fth/au l-l c..ef t.5" as identification.
EPG:
$10.50
$2,240.00
$2,250.50
$2,250.50
$.00
. 0"._.;"".....
\ 1 A ~ tu...I,?t-ht.J-iP.f
~~(J.r(0tJ~ 'k.!-
MyComm. Expires: J'I'1..(.-.q o~
Wl()f- ~~
S'c ~ u. "K:l N
AUJ!N TICEHURST
SOLICITOIlS
WEDWA. y HOUS8
I Ion CANT'I!I.UPE lOAD
Sl.l~ClIIIN!n'II.An,'" ~
/'
.'.
,
~~. .;
~'l~liH. ;t.,~..:.('
q'~"~"
FLORIl>.A.. '. . ilM"
; ~. '. I <_;.~ ~
.,. . f
.' ~'.'~
. ,\ ,
.,
'~
..
.'
INTERNAL IKPRO~ FUlID. SUTE OF
DEED NO. 17.506.
(: "', ...:
DOW ALL W BY ~~PUSDtS: !hat the Wlder~..~. the
Trustees of the Il1terl1al,~~~.~,t;emel1t Fw1d ot '; 'he S7,~"~ i~l.).j'~~"
~,
"""or and by virtuo ot tho aU~hor1'7" ot SO,OUo.., 1601t~.0, q'
ReTised ~neral Statuh!'J or ~or1da. and .~oording to'!';~~:~r':.,'
prOT!sions and prooedure prort,dea. tor. 1n ,.0t10:llJlO8#.~.~:l"
Revised General Statutes ot Flor1da, and tor'&l1d.'ln.f~cf~J~}'..ra,Uon
. '''1''
of the sum of One Hundred !hil.t1-81gh; an4 00/100 dolJ.Us :(tJ,ae.OO)
to them in hand paid by Clarenoe O. and Allae W. ~on otFinella.
· . ....(, "
Countl. Flori~a, reoeipt ot wh~oh 1s-herebl &okn~le~~. :haT~
::~::o::~:::~a:::d:b::~db:::..t::O:::i;:.~h;o::~:r~l~-
submerged lands. duoMbed a.s tOllowH. to-W1t:,,:,:,',4I:J:::;:;'.'.,
TRACT 23. From an interseotion. at the Horth~iiD' ot
~anea S;ree; and "ellii line, ot Osoeola~Al~~~,'lii';:'
Jones Subdivision in Clearwater. F1orid.;~~~J~":r
- , . ":1~""':'" .
Run Borth along Wo"tl1no ot O.O!o~ "VO~9;,,~~.,.
thenoe Weet 2li.9 tee~ to average high water1lin.on
Clearwater Ba1 to ~olnt ot beginning,
Thenoe 725 teet to ohannel in Clearwater Bal.,
. I ": '.. ~ '.~ ,.( "-'.\J:.-='::. '\''''''1' " ,"l~.
Thenoe lforthea8hr1i:Aiji'i:~k~,~,~1d.I ot ch~~'k.,:t ;i;:
a dish.noe of 83.J:...t.e~LdU';~~j)rth,:,.~t .;!f"!
: .
~enoe East,72e teet to ~Ter&se higA water line ot
Clearwahr Bay.
. .
Thono. in a. SOUth"8hr~ oour.. alo~ the aver~e
high wahr 11114t t 0 ~o1nt'()t'bei1'HJitJl.""'~','1:~~1~ ..,~
f I'. _, ',"", ,....,'\j~.. ."',
Contain1118 1.38 aoru. 'lI1ore 01' 11881. 'and. '13il18 and
hlng in l'oWORhip 29 3outh. ~.U xast, 'COuntl
ot P1nella., State ot ~lorida.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said above mentioned andde*oribed
land and nremiaee. a.nd all the title and interest o~ the rrus~ee.
therein aR ~ranted to them by 3eotion 1061 ot the Revia.d General
Statutes of Florida. unto the sald Clareno. O. and Aliot "Jloon
and their heirs and assigns, toreTer.
-1-
\.
; .
. :;,.;(,.
.>../~:i,
.~ .".. '"
~ .) ~"'~ I :,
."~.~\~
~' _:t
. '-+-\"- ~ .'
j;~ ,i
.', . i ~
';~~ :";
;
i<
'~ i;
r.' r ~
I,
k. .
~f;L
~'r?;. .
i
I
I
I
I
.' '.' ,..
~.
e
.
PINtLLAS COUNTY fLA.
Ofr .RtC,BK 10884 PG 2360
LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT " A"
>~
Parcell: Lots A and B of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION according to the map or plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76, Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida.
Together with all submerged lands, bay bottoms, and riparian rights thereunto appertaining or in
anywise belonging, more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the Northwest corner of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat
Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida, and run thence S. 12 degrees 06'
16" W. along the Westerly line of said Subdivision, 65.48 feet to the southwest comer of said
Subdivision; thence S 89 degrees 54' 00" W 630.0 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of
the channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northerly, along the Easterly boundary of said channel, to
an intersection with the Westerly extension of the Northerly line of said CLOVIS C. LUTZ
SUBDIVISION; thence Easterly, along the Westerly extension of the said Northerly line, 637.0
feet more or less to the point of beginning. The above described property is subject to an
easement to the West Coast Inland Navigation District on that part lying within 250 feet of the
center line of the West Coast Intracoastal Waterway Canal, containing 0.2 acre more or less.
That part of a certain (10) feet of unnamed alley extending West to the waters of
Clearwater Harbor from the West right-of-way of Osceola Avenue and lying south of the Freiler
property and lying North of Lot A of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat
Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida. Said alley having been vacated by
the City of Clearwater, PinelIas County, Florida, and being the same property as shown on Quit
Claim Deed from A.K. Freiler and Sarah May Freiler, his Wife, in O.R. 589, page 289, Public
Records of Pine lias County, Florida.
A parcel of submerged land in Clearwater Harbor in Section 9, Township 29 South,
._ .... R~ge 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows:
,'. .:~!'f:,:~~,,:,"~ .'! ~J;'~,., .,:', '.... :."",
Begin at the Northwest comer of Lot A of the CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as
recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida, said point being
on the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor, said Point of Beginning being 555.97 feet
North and 1949.66 feet West ofthe Southeast corner of said Section 9. From aforesaid P.O.B.
run thence N 89 degrees 24' 16" W 282.41 feet to the City of Clearvlater Bulkhead Line; thence
run N 07 degrees 28' 50" East 10.07 feet along said Bulkhead Line; run thence South 89 degrees
24'16" East 281.21 feet to the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor; run thence South 00
degrees 38' 00" West 10.00 feet along said average high water line to the P.O.B.
-7
Parcel II: From the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East; run West 398.68 feet to the West line of Osceola
Avenue; thence North 0 degrees 38' East along the West line of Osceola Avenue 545.68 feet to
the North line of an alley as shown in JONES SUBDIVISION to the Town of Clearwater,
Florida; thenc~ East 58.0 feet to Point of Beginning; thence North 83.16 feet more or less; thence
West 250.55 feet, more or less, to the waters of Clearwater Bay; thence South.22.5 deg. West
90.01 feet more or less to a point 285 feet West of the Point of Beginning; thence East 285.0 feet
to Point of Beginning. Together with all submerged land and riparian rights appurtenant to said
tract described as follows:
,.1
Tract 23, from an intersection of the North line of Jones Street and the West line of Osceola
Avenue ofJONES SUBDIVISION in Clearwater, Florida; run North along West line of Osceola
Avenue 190 feet; thence West 213.9 feet to average high water line of C1earvlater Bay to Point of
Beginning; thence 725 feet to channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northeasterly along East side of
channel a distance of 83.17 feet due North; thence East 725 feet to average high water line of
Clearwater Bay; thence in a southwesterly course along the average high water line to Point of
Beginning. LESS that portion described in that certain Order for Taking filed 1-13-61 in O.R.
Book 1083, page 97, public records of Pin ell as County, Florida.
~
.
the trustete ot the .Internal
theiT ~ooessors. an undivided
an,undivided
be:. in or
,Int"rnal
. ..i.-'.
STA.TE or
, .~~~ o'.r
.-1" ~..,.
,
.:f'
.. ....,
"":':-.~.~
,'\1.(t;~ '
. . ~k~ti "
...;~I.f,: ~J..>~,..,,~.~
mID IUY 6 \926 IT/:#J(J'IJt., IN 'n<< ~
,
JIO"l'ID 'ADO'lI. It. B .0' QUINN ct..i:RK Of ~ CIRCUn
ccun- ~ 00. fL(IUOL
.. '~!'
'i
I;
..,.",
~. '
and
.....
...........
'.~
.~
;:~f~
,..~.
. ..,~
','l1
).~~:.
";f
~~.;.t
.',j!rJ
.~
.\\
. '-~:
it)
t
"
r
:-1
"j
~'~
ai'
;~
1,;!
.,~
.~
It
II
1
CDB Meeting Date: August 21, 2001
Case Number: FL 01-06-25
Agenda Item: E3
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ST AFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
LOCATION:
304 - 308 NOlih Osceola Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to increase the maximum pemlitted
height of attached dwellings from 50 feet to 150 feet in the
Downtown District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by NOlihside Engineering
Architectural plans submitted by Harvard, Jolly, Clees & Toppe
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
1.07 acres; 46,609 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE:
155 feet of width by 167 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Attached dwellings
Attached dwellings
PLAN CATEGORY:
CDB, Central Business District Classification
(Also govemed by the Periphery Plan)
ZONING DISTRICT:
D, Downtown District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Clearwater Bay
East: Social/public service agency (Salvation Anny-plamled
relocation)
South: Attached dwellings
Page 1
e
-
l
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: High-density residential and assorted commercial uses dominate the
immediate vicinity.
ANAL YSIS:
The rectangular site is 1.07 acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue,
approximately 200 feet n011h of Jones Street. The site is located within an older, residential
portion of the City located directly along Clearwater Bay. The site contains four, attached
dwellings with a total of 13 residential units. The buildings range in height between 17 and 24 feet
and between 1,000 and 2,800 square feet. The site is heavily wooded and has a steep slope running
west/east starting at sea level and rising to 27 feet at Osceola Avenue. The site is located within
the Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood.
The site was the subject of a previous Flexible Development application (FL 00-01-03) which
included additional parcels to the north (extending between Jones and Georgia Streets and from
North Osceola Avenue to the bay) totaling 3.24 acres. That proposal included a request to pennit
150 attached dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with an increased height from 30 feet to 174
feet, and an increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre. The application also included a
request to pem1it a six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and
Georgia Street, and partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-of-way, from Jones
Street to Georgia Street. The application was tentatively approved by the CDB on June 20, 2000
pending legal acquisition of all subject parcels and the vacation and subsequent relocation of North
Osceola Avenue.
Due to acquisition difficulties, the development has been reduced in scale and includes the current,
smaller subject site. The previous application has been withdrawn and the current application
submitted in its place. The City Commission did not finalize the vacation of North Osceola
A venue.
The zoning district of the site at the time of the original application was HDR, High Density
Residential District. The City Commission changed the zoning to D, Downtown on April 19,
2001, in association with the adoption ofthe updated Periphery Plan. The Plan, an extension ofthe
City Redevelopment Plan, guides land use and densities in the downtown. The site is located
within the Northwest Periphery Area. The Periphery Plan designates the site as residential reuse
with multi-family townhomes and condominiums. Such development should be oriented toward
Clearwater Harbor and implement designs that respect these views. The maximum pem1itted
density, under the provisions of the Northwest Periphery Area, is 25 dwelling units per acre for
sites under two acres; such as this one acre site. It should be noted that the previous project
reviewed by the CDB enjoyed the higher density of 50 dwelling units per acre per the Periphery
Plan policies due to its size, in excess of 2 acres. The density bonus is intended to encourage the
consolidation of properties.
Page 2
e
e
The goal of the Northwest Periphery Area includes the encouragement of higher density,
residential development (primarily west of Osceola Avenue). Such development is encouraged to
take the fonn of townhomes and condominiums. Currently, pedestrian activity is limited due to
high traffic volume, narrow sidewalks and a lack of landscape buffering. New developments are
required to provide a more positive pedestrian experience.
The applicant seeks to increase the pemlitted height of a building with attached dwellings from 50
feet to 150 feet. Attached dwellings under the Flexible Development provisions are pennitted 100
feet in height. Buildings may reach 150 feet in height if they are located south of Drew Street,
West of North Myrtle Avenue and north of Com1 Street. Because this site is north of Drew Street,
and the requested height is 150 feet, this is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The
proposal includes 25 attached dwellings within one building. The proposed building will be
located between 25 and 115 feet from any property line and 17 feet from any surrounding
structure. Two levels of underground parking will be provided and will include 50 spaces that
exceeds Code requirements. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue at a gated
entrance/exit. There is an approximately lIS-foot condominium to the north of the subject site
and an approximately 80-foot condominium to the south.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, barrel tile roof,
and a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations. The terracotta color clay
roof tile has been designed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates the
use of cupola-type enclosures. The design is similar to the previously approved architecture.
The landscape plan exceeds the requirements of Code. This includes a mixture of various trees,
shrubs, palms and annuals. The site will be enclosed by two types of fencing: a six-foot wrought-
iron style fence with masonry columns (located along the n011h and south property lines) and a six-
foot masonry wall with masonry columns (located along the east propel1y line). The color and
materials of the masonry portions of the fence and walls will match the proposed structure.
Amenities include a swimming pool along the harbor and telmis court near Osceola Avenue. The
underground parking will include storage space for the residents. There is an existing wood dock
and no new docks are included with this proposal. Any proposed docks will need to meet the
newly adopted requirements of Code or be reviewed by the Community Development Board. A
four-foot sidewalk will be provided along North Osceola Avenue to enhance pedestrian access in
the area.
The plan includes a reference to a retention pond located at the northwest comer of the site. The
application, however, did not include a sufficient grading plan or percolation tests to show that the
pond will recover within 24 hours of a stoml event. This infonnation must be provided to satisfy
stonnwater management criteria, prior to the issuance of any permits, and the applicant is noticed
that this could adversely impact the site design. As provided in Section 4-406 of the Code, should
addressing stonnwater issues result in a site plan which is significantly different from the one
approved by the Community Development Board, the site plan must be resubmitted to the Board
for review. In addition, a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Department c01mections must
be installed on the exterior (street side) of a six-foot wall prior to issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy. The new assembly and connections must be placed on the n011h side of the entry gate.
Page 3
e
e
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
STANDARD
REQUIRED/ EXISTING
PERMITTED
25 dwelling units 13
(25 du/ac)
PROPOSED IN
COMPLIANCE?
25 dwelling Yes
units
DENSITY
(dwelling units
er acre)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE D, DOWNTOWN DISTRICT:
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
HEIGHT N/A 17 - 24 feet 150 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING Detemlined by 15 spaces 50 spaces Yes*
SP ACES the Community (2 per unit)
minimum Development
Coordinator
based on the
specific use
and/or ITE
Manual standards
The minimum development standards for attached dwellings are 1 - 1.5 parking spaces per
unit (25 - 38 spaces). The applicant has provided 50 spaces, exceeding the minimum
requirements of Code.
Page 4
-
-
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECTS IN THE D,
DOWNTOWN DISTRICT:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development standards.
The maximum height permitted in the Downtown District is 150 feet provided that the
site is located along Clearwater Bay, is south of Drew Street, north of Court Street and
west of Myrtle Avenue. The site meets all of these requirements with the exception of
being located 550 feet north of Drew Street. The CDB approved a similar request for a
larger site on June 20, 2000. The previous application included two condominium towers
with a height of 174 feet and 150 dwelling units. The project has been scaled back in
scope to a smaller parcel and a single building of 150 feet in height with 25 units.
Height is measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes
steeply towards Clemwater Bay with a grade differential of 27 feet. With the slope, the
effective project height is 136 feet as viewed from Osceola Avenue. Overall, the
structure, site plan and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown District.
Additional upscale residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy mix of
uses in this area. This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties.
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is $447,000. With the redevelopment proposal, the
assessed valuation is projected at $15,000,000. This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on sun-ounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the District.
The City of Clemwater pemlits attached dwelling uses. The site is currently zoned
Downtown (D) District, and the use is pemlitted within that classification. In addition,
residential uses are encouraged in this area by the Periphery Plan.
Page 5
-
--
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are
compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many of the structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The adjacent building to the south (Belvedere
Apartments) is approximately 80 feet in height and farther to the north, north of Jones
Street, is an approximately 115-foot tall building (500 Osceola Avenue). The proposed
condominium complex is specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the
waterfront and Clearwater Bay. It will aid in the revitalization of the downtown area.
This location provides a unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that
is currently underutilized.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses with the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The site is located in a residential area on the edge of central downtown Clearwater. The
site, uniquely located directly on Clearwater Bay, is within easy access to the major
north/south and east/west corridors within the City of Clearwater providing easy access to
and from all parts of the Tampa Bay area. There are no other sites within the City of
Clearwater available to accommodate the proposal along the harbor.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The attractive architecture, amenities and landscape design will set a
new standard for the area. It may be a catalytic project that influences other like
redevelopment efforts.
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site. The current proposal,
similar to the previously approved version, incorporates well-articulated, unified
elevations and coordinated architectural elements.
Page 6
e
e
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and Clearwater
as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban character within the
Downtown District. The increase in height above the Flexible Development provision of
100 feet as requested will not be apparent along the street. Because of the topography of
the site, the underground parking \vill not be visible from Osceola Avenue.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The minimum requirement for attached dwellings in the D, Downtown District are
between 1 - 1.5 units per dwelling unit (25 to 38 spaces). The applicant is providing two
spaces per unit (50 spaces total) exceeding the minimum requirements.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines in
Division 5 of Article 3.
The Meditenanean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, a tena
cotta, banel tile roof, a significant number of windows and balconies, vertical columns
and flat arches. The terracotta color clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views of
the mechanical equipment and incorporates the use of cupola-type enclosures. The
design of the building complies with the Downtown District design guidelines.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise attached
dwellings. The City's vision, however, as provided in the Periphery Plan includes a
revitalized, high-density residential area top support downtown businesses. This proposal
includes upscale condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive
redevelopment precedent for the area.
Page 7
e
e
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Downtown District and the proposed development will be in compliance
with that zoning classification. The proposed development will help generate a better mix
of residential uses and encourage the like redevelopment of other sites.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is permitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood. The proposal includes parking and
landscaping in excess of Code requirements in addition to other on-site amenities.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue. The proposal includes razing all 13 existing dwelling units and providing 25
replacement units. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected
intersections or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the community
character of the immediate vicinity, through attractive architecture and well-designed
landscaping.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of a single building with attractive architecture,
well-designed landscaping and decorative fencing. There will be no adverse effects
generated by the proposed development.
Page 8
e
e
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on July 12, 2001. The Plamling Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible
Development approval to increase the pemlitted height from 50 feet to 150 feet for attached
dwellings in the Downtown District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for
the site at 304 - 308 North Osceola Avenue, with the following bases and conditions:
Basis for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the sUlTounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted or
as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density of the site be limited to 25 dwellings units;
3. That Stonnwater Management requirements to be met in accordance with Code, prior to
issuance of building pennits;
4. That a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Department cOlmections be installed on the
exterior (street side) of the proposed six-foot wall, prior to issuance of a Celiificate of
Occupancy; and
5. That all signage comply with Code.
// -~-,---
Prepared by: Mark T. PalTY, Planner (1)1/~
",,'
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEXIPending ApplicationslOsceola North 302 Osceola Bay ClublOsceola North 302 STAFF
REPORTdoc
Page 9
e
e
CASE#: 1~L. 1) /-6(;,- ~~
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
~ Clearwater
-~
u~
Planning and Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4576
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plans
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 3/29/01)
~~
. l~}
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: _OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: _601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 240 CLEARWATER, FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: _727/469-8838
FAX NUMBER: _727/469-8800
PROPERTYOWNER(S): _MALCOLM CROFT, BEVERtYCROFT, BENNETTWEBER~r-;' ~tI- W-eJae..r
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME:
JOANNE FUCHS
MAILING ADDRESS: _601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 240, CLEARWATER FL 33755
PHONE NUMBER: _727/469-8838
FAX NUMBER: _727/469-8800
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION:
3"'1
STREET ADDRESS: _~08 OSCEOLA AVENUE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _SEE ATTACHED
PARCEL NUMBER: _09/29/15/53370/000/0010 AND 0020, 09/29/15/00000/430/0600
PARCEL SIZE: _1.07 ACRES, 46,615 SQ.FT.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE AND SIZE:
25 DWELLING UNITS
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): _SECTION 2-903B.1.a. ALLOW PARCEL TO BE DEVELOPED AS ATTACHED DWELLINGS;
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
SECTION 2-903B.1.c. INCREASE MAX HEIGHT TO 150 FEET
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRA.NSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO XXXX (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
e
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
_ALTHOUGH THE AREA IS CHARACTERIZED WITH MODEST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND MID-RISE ATTACHED DWELLINGS, TH E
CITY'S VISION IN THE 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE INCLUDES A REVITALIZED, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXTENSION OF DOWN-
TOWN. THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES 25 HIGH END CONDOMINIUMS WITH AMENITIES. IT WILL HOPEFULLY ESTABLISH A POSITIVE
REDEVELOPMENT PRECEDENT FOR THE AREA.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
_THE SITE IS ZONED DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ZONING
CLASSIFICATION. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL GENERATE AND ENCOURAGE A BETTER MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND
PEDESTRIAN USES, THEREBY INCREASING THE VALUE OF ADJACENT LAND AND BUILDINGS.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS A HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY THAT WILL NOT AFFECT THE HEALTH OR SAFETY
OF PERSONS RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE AN INGRESSfEGRESS POINT OF ACCESS FROM OSCEOLA AVENUE. VEHICLE
TRIP GENERATION WILL NOT HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON AFFECTED INTERSECTIONS OR ROADWAYS, WITH NO REDUCTION
IN LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ON ANY ROADS.
5. The proposed development Is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH AND WILL RAISE THE STANDARDS OF THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER
OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
_THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONE BUILDING WITH VIEW CORRIDORS ON EITHER SIDE. THERE WILL BE
NO ADVERSE EFFECTS GENERATED BY THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
o Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTCRITERIA (as applicable):
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, Intensity
and development standards.
_THE LAND USE OF THE SITE IS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD). THE MAX HEIGHT IN THE D DISTRICT IS 150 FEET. HEIGHT
IS MEASURED FROM THE MEAN ELEVATION (14 FEET) OF EXISTING GRADE. THE SITE SLOPES STEEPLY TO CLW HARBOR WITH A
GRADE DIFFERENTIAL OF 27 FEET. THE STRUCTURE, SITE PLAN AND DESIGN ARE CONSISTENT WI INTENT OF D DISTRICT. _
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing' value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
Improvements.)
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL STABILIZE AND LIKELY RA.!SE THE MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTIES IN THE AREA.
THE CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE OF THE SITE IS $447,100. WITH REDEVELOPMENT, ASSESSED VALUE PROJECTED AT $15M. _
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
-
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
_ATTACHED DWELLINGS ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT AND 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE.
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
_ADJACENT LAND USES ARE PREDOMINANTLY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL. MANY OF THE STRUCTURES ARE MID-RISE ATTACHED
DWELLINGS. THE PROPOSED CONDO COMPLEX IS SPECIFICALLY GEARED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE VIEWS OF THE HARBOR
AND WATERFRONT. IT IS ALSO INTENDED TO AID IN THE REVITALIZATION OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not
otherwise available in the City of Clearwater.
_THIS LOCATION PROVIDES A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO REDEVELOP A PORTION OF CLEARWATER HARBOR THAT IS
CURRENTLY UNDERUTILlZED, AND IMPLEMENT THE POLICIES DESCRIBED IN THE 2000 PERIPHERY PLAN UPDATE.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
_ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS A KEY COMPONENT TO THE SUCCESS OF THE DOWNTOWN. THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT WILL PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE CONTINUING REVITALIZATION OF DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER. THE
PROPOSED CONDOMINIUM BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY IMPOVE THE SITE.
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
_THE CITY WILL BENEFIT BY HAVING AN ATTRACTIVE BUILDING COMPLEX IN A REDEVELOPING AREA.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AESTHETICALLY IMPROVE THE IMMEDIATE AREA AND CLEARWATER AS A WHOLE.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT REFLECTS THE CITY'S VISION OF URBAN CHARACTER WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
_SHARED PARKING IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. ON-STREET PARKING OF VISITORS IS NOT REQUIRED.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
_THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT EMPHASIZES HARMONY WITHIITS SURROUNDINGS AND REFLECTS ON THE CITY'S HISTORIC
BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
e
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required;
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY.
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines.)
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 1 0'x12' clear space);
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and oftsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of dwelling units proposed;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Oftsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
-
G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 h Xii) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
H. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUilDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 h X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
I. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 h Xii) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
K. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize Ci representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in his application.
~
dt-
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,J
Swom to and subscribed before me this. ~ day of
::r ~l~ ,A.D. 20~ to me and/or by
:TelA"'''L. ':i.oC.cJo.~ who is 6Jei'sonally kn~ has
produced N A as
identification.
~~MQ......~~
Notary ie, fl!
My comm~p,ion ~ire : ; S; 2i'o,3
4\1 ',~ Flj,,~ af _ !)
~\:$~I"7.;/A. -.::-,-.JL:..l <O-:-.!l Roush
{~f;~~J~~'~~~~~i~Z[~~;~~~:;;,~~~~~iflO
J;fllt\~" nt!l}l':n:.J.r::' ~Gn.::EnZ' Go., Inc.
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
e
-
L. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
'.
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: I
S:\PJannmg DepartmentlAppJlcatlOn Forms\deveJopment revlewlcomprehenslve intill applicatlon2.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater
.:- .,.....~-~. ........'.":,....;.~~.i.,.1i;.;.:;.;.....\",;;.;;;,,,,( ~,__;~~'k~,;;:;iI;~'..,"';;.,~'ij.:'~.~.r.,u=~--- 10).-_
"\
'/', ,
-
1'1& COOnY, FLORiDA
-,
· Prepared by and return to:
FREEDOM TITLE AGENCY, INe.
635 Cleveland St., Suite C
Clearwater, FL 33755
OO-11~SS4 APR-20-2000 lO:~SM
PINELLAS CO' 8K 10664 PO 2359
,..........
2C147326 Q4-20-2C>>:l 10:59:51 Kl):
51 OCD-1W.m 001/JEfffi \lID
()(((}{)()))OO
In: m<:~:
RECORDI~ 002 pras 1
roc STJW - 00219 3,
EPG:
$lO.~
$2,240.00
. I ~
:es ,:;.
,
.urr
IoIT
- ~ ~ P\uperty Appraisers Parcel Identification Number:
R218 _;;. _v~ro 09/29/15/53370/000/0010
09/29/15/00000/430/0600
TOTAl:
p (}[()( PilT. TrnOCRED:
ClWH:
HY ~~ m a.rn:
$2J~J).50
$2.250.50
$.00
WARRANTY DEED
~..wan:.~'!ty",R~4!~~/tb_e,Jf,daY'Of ""flPtzJt...-._ 2a-ro .. by OSCEOLA, BAY., 'H-,
,tn47~da CorporatIon, hereinafter called the GRANTOR, to MALCOLM CROFf and
BEVERLEY CROFf, Husband and Wife, as to an Eighty (80%) Percent interest. and
BENNETT WEBER and HARRIETI WEBER, Husband and Wife, as to a Twenty (20%)
Percent interest. whose post office address is /" 1\ .I-
e(o 2> ;Vg.~ (0/ /f'/0J4S7iy!tL R.~~ _1..-rr~t..S'L-ADc, ~~SGy. 0&1
hereinafter called the GRANTEES:
.. .......;._..:......!.... o.
(~1II<d hadn lho....... "GRANTOR. Md "GRANTEE. inch";' olllbe ponieJ '" lhi. irlUNmcal. Md lhc I>ci.... lepJ ~YQ and auicna of
IndlYidualJ, and lho _ and aWl'll of coopontioN)
WITNESSETH: That the GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum ofS10.00
and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants,
bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the GRANTEES all that
certain land in Pinellas County, State of Florida, to-wit:
SEE EXHIBIT "A" AITACHED HERETO AND MADE A PAR( HEREOF.
TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging
or in anywise appertaining.
".:.
or-. u.,.. .~~.~ 0 .J,";' 0..
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever,
:;.~ ~:.'- ~....~: j(~ ~.*:.,..... -
AND the GRANTOR hereby covenants'with'said GRANTEES that the GRANTOR is
lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the GRANTOR has good right and lawful' ..',
authority to sell and convey said land; that the GRANTOR hereby fully warrants title to said land
and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, and that said land
is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, /9 cr; .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said GRANTOR has signed and sealed these presents the
day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
~~
Witness
Printed Name: 'lbt ~ CH2-e-:Y
~~
f "3 AC.'C5orJ
::::tJ;' ~fk
B erley Croft
Its President
, - Witness
, Printed,N~c,:,
:,'l' ,
STATE OF ~ WE!:/ J'...u .[<;'IC
COUNTY 0 ~IJ~ <-!r+J'Q \.(.. K. '
.:.~;;.;...~ .J:hT.f<:>regoing,instrument was acknowledged before me this ~~ay of_:'
p". .' - ftfR.L-- ,~, by Beverley Croft, President of Osceola Bay, Inc., a Florida
Corporation, on behalf of the corporation, She is personally known to me or has produced
::D It lv'~ ~l C,..(;]{ t.6" as identification.
\1,^~ fI,A,.I.?fftL\-{P.f
~'-<.M(,U'(OI\J~ '1=0 J-
My Conlin. Expires: Ji [ I ~ w-q oA-nI-J
Wl--nf- ~~
4C\"..,.Lc....c.. ~}-.I
ALLI!N TIC!!HURST
soucrroas
MEDWA Y HlXJSB
11-22 CAH1"I!LUPB ROAD
Et'&Cl"'P~""""...... .... .._....,..,
./
J.
~.
).,
..~ .
::.~
:~'.:
e
4t.
INTERNAL IllPR.0~ P't11rn, SUn: OF
.....
DEED NO. 17.506.
KNOW .u.r. lID BY ~~PU3D13: ~t the llD.d.r~~~. ;he
Trus.... ot the In"rnal~_~~.~",.m.nt >'w1d ot '. Ih. S;~.I~~f~
und.r and by virtue ot the"aU~horU7,'ot se,.U.n"l&Ol!"~~..,,, ,
Revis.d ""c.ral Stdu", ot ~orid.. &.ad .~oOrding '0'!1~~::';
proT!slonll and prooedure Pr.O~d'4 ,tor'ln S.O.10J1J108I?~~:
Revised (}eneral Statutes ot Florida, and t6r..nd:ll1.:,Cf~Jy)"4,.~Uon
. ..",1.'
ot the sum of One R'und:red 1'h1rtl-elght &A 4: 00/100 dOllUs :(tJ,ae.oO)
to them in hand paid by Clarenoe O. and 11lce W. ~on otP1nel1aa
I , ,'. (. . .
Count7. Flori~a. reoeipt ot wh~Oh ls.hereb7 aokn~le~~i :~T~
granted,. bargained, aold and (f~nTeye,d to theaa1d CIU."'8 :',', "~'
Alice ff.14oon. and their heirs '8.nd uidgns, torenr, .~'.o.,; ".~fti1n
"" bmer g. d land... d...... bod aa toll OW" . . o-wU :.,,: ,,~f:;;~..
TRACT 23. FrOll1 an interseotion. of the HOi'th(tiil.oi'
.Iones STreet and WeSt; line. ot OIlOeOla~!'a.,,'!>:,
~ones Subdivision in Clearwahr, Flori~I'/,':-r.~:~'il/}';':-: '
q '. . ',~"">,,""'.'" ~.
Run North along We.Jtl1ne ot OIlO.!<?~ A.ve.~9i.':;~!;~~.,
~enae W~et 2la.9 teei to aver&ge high wat~r~11D.'oa
Clearwater Ba1 to ~o1nt o~ b~glnn1ng,
Thenoe 72~ teet to ohannel in' Clearwater BaY."
. ": '..' '. ~ .....t..:t..-~ .0::"'....... . " f.~.
Thenae lI:orth.ash~1i.? A~"~k~;,j~ld.e ot cb~~'ki)f: i::
a distanoe Q~ 83.~i.,t..e..~:dU.:t~91'th""t.~'<
Thenoe Ea8t,72~ teet ~o ~Ter&<<e hign Yater line ot
Clearwater Bay, .
Thenoe 1n a SOUthn8hr~ aourse alo,gg the averllgt
high Y1Litr Une 'io,~oint:'"o:tlb."Hfiif~.',; ,_' ,~.~" ...~
f . ' . .. . ,'" " "'''I:!~. :" "
Conta1n1ng 1.38 1l0res.lI1ore or le8ll,8.lld111ng and
~e1ng 1n fOW21l'fhip 29 3outh, Ran<<el~ East, 'Cbunt7
ot Finellae, 3~ate ot Florida.
TO RAVE AND TO HOLD the said above mentioned and de*oribed
land and nremises, and all the title and interest ot the ~.eea
therein as ~ranted to them by 3eot10n 1061 ot the ReTiaed General
Statutes of Florida, unto the said Clarence O. and ~1oe WJIOon
and their heirs and assigns. foreTer.
c;l=-
...'
.?~"
'~'
f'
~)
~~'.i '
~?::'
..' '. '
.,.~,. ~:.,"~
";;4~~ ;.1.;)., 't~"'. '..'. ~~- '.:-
-~;~.- '~" '~i;.. .:....~... . ";;J
~-
e
-
PINELLAS COUNTY FLA.
OFF .REC.8K 10884 PO 2360
LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A"
~.:
Parcel 1: Lots A and B of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION according to the map or plat
the:eofas recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76, Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida.
Together with all submerged lands, bay bottoms, and riparian rights thereunto appertaining or in
anywise belonging, more particularly described as follows:
Begin at the Northwest corner of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat
Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida, and run thence S. 12 degrees 06'
16" W. along the Westerly line of said Subdivision, 65.48 feet to the southwest corner of said
Subdivision; thence S 89 degrees 54' 00" W 630.0 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of
the channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northerly, along the Easterly boundary of said channel, to
an intersection with the Westerly extension of the Northerly line of said CLOVIS C. LUTZ
SUBDIVISION; thence Easterly, along the Westerly extension of the said Northerly line, 637.0
feet more or less to the point of beginning. The above described property is subject to an
easement to the West Coast Inland Navigation District on that part lying within 250 feet of the
center line of the West Coast Intracoastal Waterway Canal, containing 0.2 acre more or less.
That part of a certain (10) feet of unnamed alley extending West to the waters of
Clearwater Harbor from the West right-of-way of Osceola Avenue and lying south of the Freiler
property and lying North of Lot A of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat
Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida. Said alley having been vacated by
the City of Clearwater, Pine lias County, Florida, and being the same property as shown on Quit
Claim Deed from A.K. Freiler and Sarah May Freiler, his Wife, in O.R. 589, page 289, Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
A parcel of submerged land in Clearwater Harbor in Section 9, Township 29 South,
._ Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows:
, :1Il..11~';:" ...... ..."-.$.....4... '.... : 1"
Begin at the Northwest corner of Lot A of the CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION. as
recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pine lias County, Florida, said point being
on the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor, said Point of Beginning being 555.97 feet
North and 1949.66 feet West of the Southeast comer of said Section 9. From aforesaid P.O.B.
run thence N 89 degrees 24' 16" W 282.41 feet to the City of Clear-Nater Bulkhead Line; thence
run N 07 degrees 28' 50" East 10.07 feet along said Bulkhead Line; run thence South 89 degrees
24'16" East 281.21 feet to the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor; run thence South 00
degrees 38' 00" West 10.00 feet along said average high water line to the P.O.B.
-7
Parcel II: From the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 9, Township 29 South, &mge 15 East; run West 398.68 feet to the West line of Osceola
Avenue; thence North 0 degrees 38' East along the West line of Osceola Avenue 545.68 feet to
the North line of an alley as shown in JONES SUBDIVISION to the Town of Clearwater,
Florida; thence East 58.0 feet to Point of Beginning; thence North 83.16 feet more or less; thence
West 250.55 feet, more or less, to the waters of Clea.I'Vlater Bay; thence South.22.5 deg. West
90.01 feet more or less to a point 285 feet West of the Point of Beginning; thence East 285.0 feet
to Point of Beginning. Together with all submerged land and riparian rights appurtenant to said
tract descri~d as follows:
..1
Tract 23, from an intersection of the North line of Jones Street and the West line of Osceola
Avenue of JONES SUBDIVISION in Clearwater, Florida; run North along West line of Osceola
Avenue 190 feet; thence West 213.9 feet to average high water line of Clearwater Bay to Point of
Beginning; thence 725 feet to channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northeasterly along East side of
channel a distance of 83.17 feet due North; thence East 725 feet to average high water line of
Clearwater Bay; thence in a southwesterly course along the average high water line to Point of
Beginning. LESS that portion described in that certain Order for Taking filed 1-13-61 in O.R.
Book 108 J, page 97, pubiic records ofPineiias County, Florida.
L
-.
~~
e
'ilhe rrtls ttlft 8 0 t the .lnt ernal
tb~ir &Uoo88Bors, an un~ivi~od
fWD.. to r.n uniliviutlu th1-ee-
an~
1_',. ..['f,~ ':'~
'I.rld;\title: in and to an un~ivitleil
or ma..y btL in or
~ith the privilege to mine an~
ot
"
.-t."
. ~ ,,~.
! "-. ~ . .
"'li" :<If!~:t;:<;
,. "."
\ ." '~'. -c
;.:I,(~~~
~ .-,1:;" .i,,,: :'C;' " .OJ ;'~
mID MAY 6 1926 "TJ:~tJ~. IN 'n<< 8rot
.
K01'I:D 'I.DOVI. It. B . 0' QUINN cu:ro;: OF 'nli: ClRClI!'l
axm P'IIal.AS 00. rwuDI..
. ( r.~
'r:
.:tt
II
-1
,.:~
....
. ".,)'
.k
.~
:.t-b
'T
..,'i~
'.;0,
t;}
. .-
,,'"''
".,.:.i
.~
~
M
"
"t:
~,:
'\.
.j-
~i
1!'
:J
;l
,,I
t
a4/02/2QOl 03:25
:>J14_17:3
[AIJIC 1;!E2EF: 0"=:-::
r"N;E tJ c
e3/38/2El!:Jl 18: ,1:'
"Ii '-254-0074
PAll. B JCHEG-1
PAGE: 62
i
THl8 PlfRCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (thi5 "Aarwment") is made and
entllred intc rlfective a of the Iatcst date Jet forth on the sianature pqe below, (the
"E.ff'ecti'1'e Dllk'~_ hy ad between Malcolm Croft ~ Beverley Croft. and Bennet Weber &:
Han'iet Wet~, (colJectivwly, "Seller"), and Oaceola B.y Development. LLC, a Nevada
Limited ,tJllollity Campaay C"&Purchuer").
I
PUlICHASr. AND SALlt AGR~~Mli'."'1:
Ih ere ,l'llderation oftbc mutual covenants and repre3eOtations herein contained, SCUM
and Pur<1lwer agree u foUOW!:
~. PURCIU8I; AND SALE
11. ] PnrrJ- .nd ~ SubjClCt to the tenm and conditions 0( this Agreement,
Seller ba'ebv $~ to sell and c:lOIIWy to Pun:bMet-, and Purcbacr hereby agtM. to puretwa:
from Seller "II of the riaht, title &ncUnt.erest in the entire following ~bed property
~in <: olIn: ti vel y caned me "Property");
I
I
I
11.2 Lana. AJllat (the ..L.tncr) bown U 302 - 301 Not1tl Otceol. Avenue
located m th~ City of Clea-water, Florida beiDa I1lOte particularly described in th<: atta<:he<f
OT AR!S3AR summ.ary to this A~cnt.
11.3 FA~ants. All of SeUer':! right, title lInd intercm in and to lilt euemcnr." if
any, benefittit14j the Umd;
I
i
11.4 BuiJdinQ{ll. All buildingJ loc.tccJ at the Ilbidescribed in Section 1.2of thU
A~~nt.
!
I
1!.~ RiRhu and ~YU"-q. All riJhu and ~ pmainjnw to the
foreao1na IncltJdlng any riaht, title and iDulrest of Seller in any adjacent streets, aUeys or
rights-of:wa)- .
~. PURCHASE PRICE
~.J ~ Price. The purchMc price (the uPurcbue Price") lor the Property
:thalI be ,ONE MlLLION FOUR HUNDRED AND fIFTEEN THOUSAND and NOlt 00
DoUlIn ~$I.4l 5,000.00) wi WIll ~ pejd by Purchaxr to Seller at the Clo.l"8 reduced by
thr: sum~ pSlr' to ~eller llI1dcI- Section 5.1. The Purchase Price shall be payable at ClosiDi
In Unite<<! Stme! ct.trTe:rlCy or equivalent (Le. ~' s or official chec.k of. ~Jy in6u.mI
financi.al imt1tution or fedenlJ funds wi", trItMfer). Additionally, upon completion of the
de~l()pmC'T1"OTl1t"Ttlplated by the f"urchu.en, .-videnced by acertifieat~ o(occupancY1ssu.ed
by the City \,1' CletUWlI1c!I:, Purchuen will deliver to s.,Uer:
:.!ll (kf~d (:on~ Fee simple title for <I 6th floor! (or hidJn) ~jdentiaJ
/Vv@
e
-
SECOND ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
BENNET WEBER AND HARRIET WEBER and BEVERLEY CROFT AND MALCOLM
CROFT (COLLECTIVELY "SELLERS") AND OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT LLC',
A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ("BUYER", "PURCHASER")
1. This Addendum is effective as of June 1, 2001 and supercedes the Addendum to
Purchase and Sale Agreement executed April 6, 2001 by the Sellers and executed
AprilS, 2001 by Purchaser. The said first Addendum is void effective June 1,2001.
2. The Parties reaffirm that the Purchase and Sale Agreement executed by Purchaser
April 3, 2001 and executed by Malcolm Croft and Beverley Croft on March 31,2001
and executed by Bennet Weber on April 2, 2001 and by Harriet Weber April 1 ,2001
is in full faith and effect subject to the following amendments:
Paragraph 4b - Is amended to add the following:
There is presently pending in Pinellas County, Florida a mortgage
foreclosure by Bank of America, et al versus Sellers encumbering the
property referred to in paragraph 1.2 of the Purchase and Sale
Agreement. However, Sellers represent that they will reinstate the
mortgages with the funds to be received by this Addendum and will
not further m0l1gage the property prior to closing.
Paragraph 5.1 - Is amended to read as follows:
The closing (the "Closing") shall be held at the office of Freedom
Title, Clearwater, Florida (the "Escrow Agent") on or before
September 3,2001, (the "Closing Date"). Buyer acknowledges that
Seller has incurred costs and expenses associated with an earlier
proposed closing date, and will continue to incur such costs and
expenses up to and beyond the closing date of September 3, 2001.
Buyer agrees to pay Seller the following amounts to compensate
Seller for their costs and expenses incurred and to be incurred:
5.1 a - $50,000.00 is now being held in trust by Paul B. Johnson,
Esquire and the Parties agree that Paul B. Johnson, Esquire may
immediately release said sum to the Sellers which sums will be non-
refundable but, shall be credited to the purchase price at closing.
5.1 b - $260,000.00 shall be paid by Purchaser to Sellers on or before
June 6, 2001 by wire transfer or bank cashier's check. Said sums shall
e
e
be delivered to Paul 13. Johnson, Esquire, Seller's attorney. Said
sums shall be non-refundable but, shall be credited to the purchas'e
price at closing.
Paragraph 7.2 - Is amended to read as follows:
If Purchaser breaches this Agreement, Seller may terminate this
agreement and thereupon be entitled to retain any monies already paid
by Purchaser under section 5. I a and b as liquidated damages (and not
as a penalty) This Section 7,2 shall survive the closing of this
Purchase and Sale Agreement. Additionally, Seller may have the
remedy of specific performance if Purchaser breaches this
Agreement.
Paragraph 9.10 - Is amended to read as follows:
Date of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be null and void unless
executed by all parties by June 4. 2001 by 2:00 p.m.. As used in this
Agreement, the terms "Effective Date," "date of this Agreement" or
"date hereof' shall mean and refer to the date of execution of this
Agreement by Seller.
3. The Parties agree that Freedom Title of Clearwater shall prepare warranty deeds
conveying the property which is the subject of this Agreement and that Seller shall
execute such warranty deeds as soon as reasonably possible and said deeds shall be
held by Sellers attorney, Paul B. Johnson in escrow to be turned over to Freedom
Title of Clearwater at closing.
a)j Development, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company.
Date:
6 - I - 0 ,
epts the foregoing offer and agrees to sell the Property on the terms and
2
e
e
Seller:
Malcolm Croft
date:
Beverley Croft
date:
date:
Bennet Weber
Harriett Weber
date:
The performance by Purchaser to the Second Amended Addendum to the Purchase and Sale
Agreement and the Purchase and Sale Agreement as amended is guaranteed jointly and severally by
the following: atrix Lodging, LLC, Wayne L. Weaver, individually, The Ellenburg Family,
LLC, Ger. (l . Ellenburg, individually.
MAT
date:
~~~-61
THE
date:
~~'1-0(
date:
6 . ~ / 0 ,
Wayne L. Weaver, individually
date:
3
e
e
"'~'"-"T-",,~.....:;v .,-,. ,.".""',---...........--".-..............--..-.-~~r............~ " "'.
~~-...;...,.,.._~
n _ _ .. "_ _ _ "" "_"" __ "_ _" _"_ _ _ _" _.. _" " .. _ "" .. _ .. _ _ .. _"_ __ _q" .. _ "_ .. .. _ _ _ _ _ _ .. .. "_ _ .. """~ _"".." _ " "
fS/8J!2eB2 12~18 ~l3-Z54-S~74
.......~-..........."'"""'--..... -~~"'ro.._~ _.., ~,
\1./06 'OJ HI:3J .tlH~4.ta~~,H3,
0i/e4/Zee1 l;:~l e~3-2!4.ee74
PAll B .J Oh't\j Sa-,
~R!M'liLD!J eX!(
"''----- .."
~~ E Jo+GON
----"
P/,GE eol
iOO~tOO~
r>~~ ~<
SN;'~-u;
1.1""" er.6 fh.
~-~ ---
~VOfi"r CnJA
dat.;~~-" .
. jtJ~ ~
4...,---.Jt.J ~. ,
-.
Be=- W.r
-
A-t....
""'''1-".
"--
T
Harritft "" ebtt
di..:__
- ...,,~
.,.". ;oorl1>_ try. t""hI".r 10 ,h. 5'''04 Amondod -"-dd.nduo: .. tho "",c,,",, ond SIl,
AQfe.m,.. Illd .... Plr.i....1I!\ll Sol. "-lint .. .....d.d " _td Jointly fl>d .. ver.Jly by
,I" rOll.Win,: JIf.tth L""Ji.... l.tc, W. YDt L. W"'.,.loNIl> ldblb, T...ta..b.... , ...ify,
LLC, aw.1d D. It1r"bu~ ~Ua1I1.
MA TiUX LODGING, L(.C
.- J
~,; CIl,.ld D, EUcsn"lU&' Ch.Unnan.
-
dak:
~
~ILLENBVRO'AMmLYLLc
~; o.rak1D. Ellenburl. M.nq,,,. M~Ulbct
ar.;_
~
0etwLd .0, BJ.IttdQ~ 1n~vid\&al".,
-
d.IIe: _
~
WilYk L. We~JY.. iJ\cll;~aJly --_
da.te:_
J
, .": I.~.
t'J I,J,; '_J.L
'_l'i"_'"
[,-<\'__1.' ,'I~:r:-:' ,..1'41,
:'\. .. -1-1,.
-,: C,cl - ,: -_,
r':..I_,ll c:. '1~1;{ll':;-I'
Sellu:
;\1Jkolr!11 ( I \' I
ddte,
I' _ _....~__.____
H\.'V(' II t'~' ( ; I tl
(/)
~r--V.~
da It":
BtlUld l\, I 'I i
Lid- (3{) /
- , /-i- /
~jt- Gi~
i 1&!1 !I,.'r! \\ ~ :'.,':
dak -0 v<--~_lL- ""LVQ
(
rhe pcrformum-(' bv P'Jrchl1ser to rh~ Second Amendt:d Addend'e:m to the P:.lI(ha_'-~ ;l]ld SJ:"
I\greemonl illld rho' f~urchast" i:nd S:lJe Agreement as amended :$ guaran~eed JOInt!) and ,>,=\,(')'all) b:
the folln'\"n--: ,'111trix l.odCing, LLC'. Wayne L WU\er, individuall:v. The EII~l1hurg Famil:_
LL<', (;~rald ll_ ~11{'nburgt individually
"lATRIX LOll(;li\i(~, LLC
------~-
hy: Ger:l1id!) F!I-~nbllrg_ ChaIrman
date__________,___
THE FLl.F'VBt'RG FAMU;Y LLC
hv (~t)rald n ~::l(',b\\L;_ "fnnaging Meil1ner
.j a~ ~
date
Cr~rald D: EJkn1::-\ir~~ individually
\"-:ayne' I \\ (~:l\'n. :ndlv,dllally
Jat~ ________
3
, J L.; I ,- U 4 - (J ,\ 1 0 : 52 A '-', a& We a v Q '"
,; 'J I L'~' ~ U '.J 1 1. ~ ' ... 0 0.J.: _ _ _ i., "J 4 - Cl () ( '.
7~462-UU81
~I'IUL Jj .JUhr'60il
I-' . (1;
~n{'j[ '~l ~
S.tler~
MaJcolm Croft
date,
B(:verley Croft
-
dale:
Bennet Weber
date:
Harriett Weber
date:
The performance by Purclwer to the Second Amended Addendl.lm to the Purchase and Sale
Aifeemenl and the ~hll3e Md Sale Aifeemem as lllJ1cnded i, guaranteedjointJ)' and severally by
the fot/oWing: M.trix Lodlin~l LLC, W.YOt L. Wuver, individually, Tbe Ellenburg Family,
Ltc, Genld D. Ellenburr, individually,
MA TRIX LODGING, LLC
by' Gerald D. EJlcnburS, Chilinnan
date:
THE ELLENBURG FAMILY LLC
by: Gerald D. Ellen b UZ-8.. ManaginS Member
date:
Gerald D. Ellenburg, individually
~ d. J1~
Wayne L. eaver, individually
date:
date:
4~ol
(/
J
.FIl;~vrr T'H) f\.1Jnlln\\lJi~. n,\J~~. ~I\\\
PL^N~(~ &. DEVRLOPMENT SRRV1CES A1)MTh11s'r~A~H)N
MUNrCIJJAI. SERVICES IJl.JIUJIN(i. JO() SOUTH M'iRl1J: ,<\ VLl'-.'I)E, r' l-lO(JIZ
----..--. Pl{ONBi72"l)-5b14567 FAX (1]7) 56~-457(' __~
STATI: Of FLORIDA
COUN'tY OF PINSLlAs
Malcolm Cr.oft
_.....,~-
'---'--n-~ .n_.____-.- ________.___.
. -~-._----.---
Beyel'lY Croft
.. -~--'----..-., -.,.----
'-~~ --~'---- '--.- -~-- -
(Nlm. off IIJI PCl>pelty awnOI'3)
~.._._~----------~_.. -~,.~_..------- ----
1. That (I am/v.te are) the owner(s) and (Gcord title holder(s) of the following describ~d property.
ADDRess Oil GfNERA~ l.OCATION:_----2Qi=1~_~g.l.a_...iL'i~.
~-._-- -------.------
..........----.-------
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Residential Development
---~--.-
~'--'--------..-....-_~--~- ..
_._-~-_._--_._--- '-----~-------.~~--.- -
(Na:ura of 'lkluut)
----- _._-_..._~._--------~--_.. .----.---.---- ---- .._--_._....~----
3. That tht: undersignsd (haslhave) appointed and (dons/de) appoint
___In -c h a r d ~~_ 0 f _ O_~"~_Q..l.2 Bay llU-n.Q.J2..Jlll:IU.......__
.. (NO~he~) "lIOn/CI) 10 tQctJ(.. any ~~.. Of ~r ti<lc""",1l1l n-....y ll'l11'l...-:1 ~","I I>'1Illon:
- .----.. -. - - '--'-
H'lf t~lis affidavit htl5 bean eXecuted to induce the City of Claarwatar. Flonda to co(J~.i;Ju _",:.I ;,iC(
0r, If 18 above described property;
'. Th;:jt (Ilwa). the under~iQn/'ld authority. tlereby cetlify 1I1~( tho foreQolnQ is [rUr; ~nd ,;011 ""I
.... .--.-----~nAJ.. OTATE OFFLOR'bA, COllN1Y OE,t'" 'i,'
~.,.!;cD(f'IOFWtI'~ ~- _ SWolflln and lKlb5cilbQd betore me tl"s ...~D _. . dOy "I
.Ma leal I~ of ~. .......sl C-iij/{. -~~~''''l.odJ. to rrw ll;liJ/OI
.-.----~. ~ --. .---.-....--- by -1::!..-~__:::!:::f.:!LC. . whu is 1!""")I)~:r\..
.,>lEO(p .. known h~~ prrxluceO~s.s. t---? ~...___
----- .'1$ Idcntltir.,glian. 0/1.--J((lf!} 01c...t!. Ita?
Bev rly croft
;~D(P~~-.__._----------
.-...-.--------------..--.
'.IG~:"Q {P'''P'Ntt ~,
.-----. n___._
~ /dd ~~____._
Howy llUbIio. S'" / '(LI '-/c; r"""
~_..: uV1..
ALLEN T;CC;-:URSr
SOLlCITOFlS
MEOWAv House:
18-22 CANTElLUPt:: ROAD
EAST CRINS"rEAD, IN. SUS~X
.RH't9.~BJ ....
Tel: 01342823':::::;1 I ::;1...?.:.~!,7
..., - ~ .... . . - . - ..- ....... I' .AD)
(DX:..3.0p.c.[-, _. ._. , ......".~ '-
!.I.F. No. 17,046 --/ / 4 6047 -j 9 / 16 7
1-~~~~~-~-7 L606 t---~ 604
LIF. ~Io. 17,491~OVT J::.2.T~ I .s 600/ / 603 8 17 60:1
_~___GOVT~~ 6 \ \6017 186007
~~ HARRINGTON612'\ ~'~~ 8 612
I. I. F. No. 17,494 \ /1 5-77 610\ 511
r-~--~~~__ I ~ 12 508 \ 509
\50~ .s 0> 505
HARBOR BLUFFS \ 508 ~
W A TERFRO NT 50~ t06 vi
- 504 ::i 503
CONDO
21-31
I.I.F. No. 17,493
r------~~~_~~
~~~~---~~
o
'"
p
8
500
ci-J
2 1
\40 \
STREET
406 4D 407 7 I
1
"" 404
o
2 402
GEORGIA
J
,
f---_~~~__ /
LIF. No. 17,648 ,,~
...... ....................
9 4;4
10 ~
.... 402
11 G v
43/04 312
~~
'------------
/.IF No. 17,484
I.LF. No. 17,506
~--">.
~-------
ft............. ..........
1.1.F. No. 17,377 J BELVEDERE APTS
CO-OP UNREC
300
--------
I;;; JONES STREET
'0&
,:;.-
::;
CD
[[J I
en
m
"
~o'
".
,.
"
D
43/07
3io w
o~ =>
ci~ Z
'en m !5!
<(
200 <(
-1
~ 0
DREW STREET 0 ~
Cf) (/)
05:'
112/07 1281 ~
fo':I/
751-439
~-~~I 0.8.1490 557
405 6
.5
403 \:
400
~
401 ..,.
3
400
L
~06 21 28
/ 30 1 - I ~ 6
601 19 1 t ~6 3(
t.-- III~.
509 1 NICH(~l oON
2 & ~
. T THIS IS NOT A ,L
3 S I SURVEY I
I-
1 38 5 L
HARTS IR2ND
501 2 'f 1
409 (3J /1;';
407 3~ '" "
"" 4
-!:;2 0
6 ~ >
~I 354'
9~,1
.". <ococoH
a a 0_
'" '" '" '"
-
7 510 II- Js'07
.
""<l;
500
o
'"
406
'---
405
8
4
310
308
'2'1
321 g 2 N
........ -::t lr.:o G
319. n:: ~ J, ~c Rr.,
t:: ;g ..) C\l 1-7 74-344
""
'"
LQ
HART ST.
I ~~
3 41
~
'" I
"I
li)
8 I
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
OWNER: Malcolm Croft, Beverley Croft, Bennett Weber
and Harriett Weber CASE FL 01- 06- 25
SITE: 304-308 North Osceola Avenue I PROPERTY SIZE (ACRES): 1.07
I
PIN: 09/29/15/53370/000/0010
09/29/15/53370/000/0020
09/29/15/00000/430/0600
ATLAS 2778
PAGE:
z 31744/0n9 8..,,7
0 L ~ ~(3)
(/) co 10Wl' 3
~
0::
<( 305
:r: f---- - - _
f- 301 2 3 4
0:: 1 ~ '" ~.."
0
lL. '" co "I "I
l;; <;; "I '"
~ '" li) I
0
0:: CD
0
Z
225
10 9 8 7 ~
L[) ~ "" J(~>
0>
L[) ~
311
...... 2.? l() 0-
;: "'q- ;: ::;;
:::i'
~ ~ ~ ~
"'r .".. "l- ~
-
4 '/06 .43/05
~ <D ~ -:;: I 43/03 [ 300
/j Voc. 4/6/59 591-iia62 1_ ~~ 309
v A LUTZ - -l YA- 7'46 607
r--~"- r; B ~
B 35 76Q/L ~r--10L 2\j I~~:
J. 301 1 TII/)N ",~,' I 0>-1 C\1
o-...'tL\ J.:r)~ ~P-.
~ f I-1t3~~A 300
g g 2 I
> .". .".
;.: C\l ~
" .". "
~ 2 f-C1__vac.17401-1374
221 C3 . 1 L[) HAYDEN
.:: m CD
U};:J J; 4 200
u U}2 H6-4 3
.S2 0::: 3
~
.".
en
n
18% 175
1815-4:!J
lE5Q-2:i2
12/06 ~
403 7
401 8
cia CZI
u)~ 1 2
'" 201 ~f->
~ co
55 ;;,;
r----
55 1 35
135
nl>;O~UJ"''::'~C':;''''
ljfllrl!~l
~~~~~~~~~E~~
iiil"!I!!11
o;~~~ e~~f,' -r-~~
ji\li Ij I i j Ij
.
~~~~~~ C)~~0~~'"
~ ~ I ,
"I!I! i;i!l!l
g~ '1';:g,~~~ ~~~g~~~
j;jijlf*Hij
.
'5
:0
'"
11IJ~~N[l
rf':~~Ml'fn "~.::.!'~):'~_:~'_'.:',f'G [,(."
"""''''.', ,"'"
-",'<'\I':~
e
,,02"58'48"[
64.06'
N02"58'48"E
66.00'
r
m
C)
m
z
o
J',~,:~;::.~'r::';,' :R:,'I:';' ~"
N07"'fO'4 .
o E(C)
EAST EDGE
CUT p_">:
~6 INTRACOASTAL
WA TERWA Y
~':
1\'
THE cn
Y OF
ClEARWA T
ER BUlK ~
Ht.AD
liNE
~'g:,'u<"e r.;
e".:",,;I" Ar'
~Pp
RO-\'I"~
1E:
~E:~N
" -. /-fIG/-{
, -""":':""lI-Al<'1l
111vE:
!mm!,:! .';""'<11
::-"; C:;::i:'{b2l;~",i;;i;}=
~c~" ,,"' >:..r i'! I I
(40' R/W) , "
I
i
I
.j
j
o
w
l-
I-
<C
-1
=:J
.....:...~!"jo",'" 20'
. ---..ffi;
J
o
o
"
J
"
i
~
~.
!-j
/i
1\'
10'
!Il !I!:
m~i
ml!
Il!li
.,,"~
Iii! ii' ;';
,. <. ."", .,.., "'1
~
'" GRAPHIC
~___.J ',' '" SCALE
-
I LJ:~~)f!
N
OJ
o
-i'>
t
I~
i:
~~
~~
=:go
ZlD
n-
'=--J
, ~
J><
lJlU
ni'0
OlD
~Yl
--J .
-<-
- ..u
'lC!
,'1
o
:;o~
6(Jl
)>'1
e
e
Harriger, Sandy
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Harriger, Sandy
Friday, July 27,2001 10:32 AM
Chase, Susan
Fierce, Lisa
Neighborhood Associations for CDB Notice Mailing
?..i~=I'.,.'L','".' E' '.
., "
,r.,:,;' I
Susan, when you mail out the notices for the CDB meeting of 8/21/01, please add the following Homeowners Associations
to your lists as follows:
Item E1 - 2652 McMullen Booth Road -
Mail to:
Forestwood Estates Homeowners Association - Ms. Kathy Milton, 1883 Forestwood Dr., Clw, FL 33759
Item E2 - 211-217 Dolphin Point -
Mail to:
Island Estates Civic Association, Ms. Phylis Boksen, President, 690 Island Way #810, Clw, FL 33767
AND Dolphin Cove Condominium Association, Ms. Judy Schweikert, 255 Dolphin Point Rd., Clw., FL 33767
Item E3 - 304-30~N. Osceola Ave. -
Mail to: .
Harbor Bluffs Waterfront Condominium Association, Mr. Hermann Strijewski, 600 N. Osceola Ave. #105, Clw, FL 33755
AND Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association, Mr. Jeff McKinney, President, 1844 Venetian Point Dr., Clw, FL
33755
Thanks!
Sandy Harriger
Admin. Analyst
Planning Department
Tracking:
Recipient
Chase, Susan
Fierce, Lisa
Delivery
Delivered: 7/27/2001 10:32 AM
Delivered: 7/27/2001 10:32 AM
1
III 0 W W
III ...c C
WU-i-O
C C N
III 0
:::::J C
...o,-+-
W
-o...cC
C-i-O-o
o ~.+= C
>-._ U 0
-i- -0 C ."
t.. t.. :::::J ...,
W 0 '-' C
0... 0) C 0
o wON
t.. t.. U
0... C W
o C III
W -i- t..
-i- 0 W 0...
8E...o~
:::::J t.. 0 -i-
-0 0 C
W~oW
>
o -
III
1Il-o
W W
-i- Vl > '-+-
W t.. -i- C Vl
O)wc3:o
t.. cwo W
o 3: U t.. t..
I-occao
1;1
s::
o
.-
+-
a
\J
s::
a,)
E
E
o
u
a,)
CL
-o...c
C -i-
o 3:
.
t:ca
3:=>
I
C
o
0...
-g C
o~
C 0
o -i-
o...W
...0
~-o
:::::J :::::J
-0 0
c...c
o Vl
Vl
W C
...c 0
-i- t
-i- 0
C 0)
W C
5 3:
0.....2
Eo
'-+-
o W
-i- ...c
t.. -i-
W Vl
~ W
o u
C 0
H 0...
e
-i-'-+--i-
cow
W W
E ~ ~
~ .~ III
o -i-
5- iJ 0)
E ~ C
U 0...
o
W U
o ...c III
-i--i--o
C
0... W _0
o > III
U 0 W
5-.~ -i-
E ...0 -i-
R:::::J
-0
C
o
Vl
..:::t:.
t..
o
0...
-i-
C
W
E
W ~
o...t..
E W
.- -0
t..
-0 0
C .c:
o
W III
N t
>- W III
o '-,-0
coo
_ t.. 0
....... 0... t..
.
-i- 0
Vl -i-
W
3: 0
...c W
-i- t..
t.. 0
o W
Z t..
-i-
C
W W
t: W
...c
-i-
cO)tJ
...c C t..
-i- C -i-
3: 0 Vl
N-o
W
0) t.. ~
C >-.-
C ...0 ~
o 0 N
N W C
t.. 3:
W ..;( 0
-i- C -i-
o 0 C
-0 Vl ~
~ 5 D
C 0... W
o X...c
'->W-i-
.
0-0
-i- C
o
-i-
C
W
E
0...
o
W W
> U
W 0
-00...
III
3:
W u
C
..0
E R
o
t..
'-+-
Vl
..:::t:.
t..
o
0...
III
..:::t:.
o
3:
W
-0
Vl
0...
o
Vl W
W >
W W
,-+--0
0)
C
-0
:::::J
U III
C W
W
t..
o -i-
t.. W
1--0
o
...c
III
-0
C
o
Vl
o
W
C
CL
W
....c
-i-
C
o
Vl
-i-
C
W
E
W
>
o
t..
0...
E
III
W
....c
-0 g
-0 W
..;(..0
.
III
C
o
-i-
C
:::::J
o
'-+-
t..
W
-i-
o
3:
e
U -i-
U
E ~ d
o -i- W
C -i- t..
800
wow
-i-...c
-i-
W t.. 0
...c W -i-
-i- ~ Vl
o ~
Vl
...c C W
-i- C
3: -i- III
C :::::J
W ..0
Vl E-o
-i- C
t a 0
o 0... Vl
'-+- W t..
1;)D~
-i- 0
C W
W W >
-i-EW
o 0... -0
C 0 >-
~ W -i-
o > 0
o W :::::J
'-> D 0-
.
C -0 Vl t..
o W W W
Vl ,.... W '-+-
....I....l t.. 0
t.. ..0 -i- Vl
t.. 0
o U
I
W
-0 W
0)1 >
ltclIltJ
0... '-+- 0
z80t:
C ~ ~ t
o 5 :::::J
Vl
-i-
U
W
'-'
o
t..
0...
W W
W > 2:;
t.. Vl E
o C
E W
-i- 0
X
W
0)
0) C 0
ciJ-g-i-
E :J 0
o U -0
U C ~ 2
U W 0
:::::J 3:
~c~-o
~ ~ 9 5
I- ..;( U U
.
-0
o
o
...c
t..
o
..0
...c
0)
.~
C
W c-o
...c 0 C
-i- 0
...c
-i-
3:
t..
o
..0
t..
o
...c
W
...c
-i-
-i-
U
W
C
C
o
U
o
-i-
C
o 0
o...t..
o I-
0... III
o 0
W-
> W
W C
DCL
.
C W W
...c ...c
-o-i--i-
W
-gcb
W
E
o
W
..0
-0
:J
o
...c
III
-i-
U
t..
-i-
III
-0
0)3:
C 0
~ 0 -i-
N III
COO
3: -i- E
o C
+- t..
C t.. W
3: W +-
o -0 Vl
D2:;2
o
W W
III t..
:::::J ..;(
>-0
E 1;:
o W
't-od
~ ~ ~
~ 0: ..;(
.- "'-
III c.>
U
'-+-
'-+-
o
C
o
Vl
C
o
0...
X
ill
+-
Vl
W
3:
....c
+-
t...
o
Z
+--0
U C
o 0
0...
E
c.>
t...
:::::J
+-
C
t..
:J
'-+-
W
~ vi
^' t.. -0
..., 0... 0
~ E ~
.
('I
('l
W
U >-
o 0
0...5
1Il..:::t:.
o
3:
..:::t:.
t..
o
0...
c.>
3:..0
W 0
cy::
0)1;:
C c.>
-0-0
:J
U
C >-
W
0...
o
U
III
III +-
o W
c.> c.>
t..
+-
III
C
o
E
E
o
U
-0
c.>
0)
t..
o
C
c.>
IP ... ,. " . , ,. ....... e e e e e .. .. . . .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. ... _ .-
.
Vl
o
t..
W
-i-
o
E
C C
t..
W +-
> Vl
o Vl
O)Vl
o 0
-i-
t..
o
'-+-
W
0)
o
E
-
-i- Vl 5 +-
C W C
o U +- c.>
^' 0 +-
0... o......c Vl
Vl -i- Vl
'-+- 0) C
o ~ C 8
-i- -i- 0...0 0
Vl 0
C ~ -0
,-+--oc
-0 0 C 0
~ 0)...s2 >-
o C -i-
t... .- W -i-
0... t; t C
0...._ > W
o ~.t:-o
cOo...C
o U-o 0
>-c 0)0
0... -= 0 C c.>
oaU-i-t..
W E 0 0
> ..0 W W
Wt..:Jt.......c
, D 0... 0... U -i-
\.
\
I
~
~
Ij
~
>-VI
- I>)
~ v
.~I
u
o
Cl..
l::
Cl
Cl..
o
'+-
VI s:: I>)
I>) 0 ...t:
:::J VI r
VI c '
VI Cl c
0....2
C) X 0..
...t: W C)
r r VI
VI VI :::J
VI C)-o
C) ~ C
t... ...t: Cl
-Or
lJ t...
Cl 0
o Z
r I>)
t.......s::
C) r
-0 c
t...
O...t:
s:: r
H 3:
o
r
C) Cl
V >
-0,+-0
C) '+- E
-0 0 C)
C t....
C)
r Cl
s;: r
C)
t....
Cl VI
:::J
r VI
s:: C)
C) VI
> :::J
C)
3: C) d
t.......t: t....
Ol--ti
VI-o :::J C)
t= t o,"'g :::J
.- 0 s:: .- ~
v r -0 >
d d s:: <;(
s:: d
V E C
t.... VI 0
C) 0 C) VI
E -0 v t...
EVlSaL!)
8~~Io
:::J VI VI
d d r
s:: VI -0 C) LL 0
t... Cl C) V r
d ,_ X Z d
E ~ E -5 t...
d >
E-o
C) s:: '+-
t.... d 0
VI
...t:
d r
C)
t...
d
-0
C)
r
d
v
o
In
~
...t:
r
Q') d
s:: C) E
o t... d
d Cl '+-
e
\
-0
:::J r
o C
...t: C)
VI E
s::
o
t...
'>
s::
C)
:::J2:"-
...0-0
s::
'+- C)
o t...
'+-
r s::
X d
C) t....
r r
s:: VI
o C)
V-o
C)
-0 0..
s:: 0
o C)
r
C) 0
o E
v 0
if) 5-
VI
Q')
s::
-0
.....-l
.....-l
C) s:: VI
t... d
v ,
0-0
C)
t... r
I>) d
0..-0
L!) C)
N t...
r d
o VI
C) 0
GL!)
o
C)'+-
t.. 0
o
E >-
r
VI
s::
C)
-0
~'+-
s:: '-0-0
:::J t... C) C)
C) VI r
>- > 0 r
C) C) E
3: t.... t...
o V C)
IS::o..
d
C)-O
t.... ~
o r
VI r
...t: E
r ~
s:: 0..
I>) t...
t... 0
o N
rC)O-oC)t...
v -0 r s::...t: 0
C)o Or'+-
'0' ~ d --.l
t... C)
Cl.. 1::: t... ~
<;(
r C) r
s:: E s:: ...t:
C) 0.. s:: v
Eoo-o:::J
0.. C) VI C) VI
o > s:: t...
C) ~ R~ 0
&; X ~'+-
-0 >- W 0.. >-
C) r VI -
Ci. '- 0.. C)
s:: VI r o.....t:
Ei:gor
'EE VI~,+-
H 0 s:: 0
~ ...t: r t..
^' r d C)
'" ...t:-O
...t: 3: r t....
r 0
-0 s::
s:: Q')
o VI
C)
-0
VI s::
s:: 3:
o 0
rr
o s::
> 3:
o 0
s::-o
~
t... 0
r
C)
t....
r C)
S::...t:
~-o
E d
0..
o
C)
>
C)
-0
~
VI
s:: VI
o C)
VI s::
s:: C)
3: d -0
C) 0..._
Z X :::J
C) Q')
N
.....-l
~
t...
V
o
~
>
VI
s::
C)
...t:
C)
t...-o
0..C)
E s::
o,+-
~ ~
C)-O
...t: VI
I-- 0
-0
C)
...t:
VI
0..
E
o
v
v
d
C)
...0
-0
:::J
o
...t:
VI
w
Q') -
s:: :e
~ VI
t... VI
d 0
0..0..
t...
C)
-0 >
C) ~
t... t....
d ~
...t: ...t:
if) 3:
M
.....-l
C)
>- -0 VI s::
...0 C) :::J H
VI
:::J 0
C) ...t: s::
...0 VI d
Cl..
...0
>- d C)
o r VI
E iG :::)
e
C) C)
VI...t:
:::J r
-0
s::
d
t..-o
o C)
...o...t:
t... VI
o
I 0..
t... E
C) 0
r v
o v
3: 0
t.... I>)
d ...0
C)-o
~ :::J
s:: 0
C) ...t:
C) VI
3: 0
r t..
]1--
s:: VI
o 0
r C)
v s::
C) Cl..
s::
s:: C)
O...t:
~ r
-Or
s:: :::J
d 0
...t:
C) Q')
r :::J
.2 ~
t......t:
o..r
o
t... r
0.. VI
0.. .-
o X
C)
-0
s::-o
o
:::J
Q') 0
s::...t:
s:: VI
o
N
o
C)
VI t..
r 1::: <;(
s:: C) s::
C) E 0
r ~ VI
VI t... s::
VI :::J 0
s::o-o..
o C) X
~ t.. W
'>t
L!)
.....-l
.....-l
...t: VI C) d ...t:
r ...t: ...t: C) r
3:rrt..t
C)S:::E<;('+-
r
...0 ~ s:: C)
r13'+-OVl
0._ ~ d
0.. '+- ~
Ertdt..
OS:::do..C)
uC)t...x:t:
C)-o tW b
...oVl-oVl>-
ti~r...t:r
:::J:::Jgr...o
E -0 t... X
C) C) 0 C)
rVlrO'+-
d:::Jr...t: '+-
C)-O E Vl13~
...o~~-o...t:r
C) r 0 0..S::: VI,+-
N VI 0.. 0...0 0
VI:::J~~s::d
E 0..._ d ti
t1:::~--go...C)
C)1--5C)t...
E E t... VI C)
:::J o..d S:::)r
E 0 C) VI g
C) t... -0 t...
s::: > d ~ s:: 0
EC)s:::...t:o...t:
-0 r --.l u
r
C)
C)
'+-
C) -0 C)
VI I>) t...
:::J VI d
o :::J
0.. 0-
o VI
t.. 0
0..0
C) 0,
rO
VI N
r
VI
d
~
~ VI
-ot
o C)
~ .--
o
t..
ro...
s:: r
C) s:::
E C)
o..E
o 0..
C) 0
> C)
~ >
o ~
-0
C)
>-Ci.
r
s:::
:::J
E
d E
o
>.~
d
s:: C)
o...t:
r r
-0
-0
<;(
C)
...t:
r
o
r
-0
C)
r
C)
...0
-0
:::J
o
...t:
VI
d
C)
t..
<;(
s::: C)
o t...
VI 0
s::: v
o s:::
0..3:
X 0
W r
s::
C) ~
...t: 0
1---0
'-0
.....-l
DO
C'l
t.. r
o VI
'+- :::J
E
'+-
s:::
H
C)
>
VI
s:::
C)
...t:
C) r
t.. C)
E-E
>- 0 C)
...o~...o
CJ 0
-c +-
+-
t..
+- CJ
0-0
t..
-0 0 C
CJ ::
+- C 0
U +-
CJ C
~ 0 ::
CJ 0
CJ t.. 0
...0 0 0
-0 CJ +-
~ -;: >-
o t..
-c'+-1=
tn 0 CJ
~ >-l!
o a +-
C -0 tn
.~ C 0
tn ~ +-
o
>-...0 >-
o '+-
:: -c +-
CJ +- C
+- t.. CJ
o 0 -0
<..!) C
t'-...
.-l
-ccCJ
+- 0 -c
~ E +-
-0 ~
CJ
+-
o
u
o
tn
tn
o
o
CJ
t..
o
-0
C
o
CJ
-c
+-
'+-
o
+-
t..
o
0....
t..
o
'+-
-0 01
~ C
0..::.::
-f;i t.. t..
0..2..~
E :: 0
/!l.ol!
+-,+-f-
o t.. CJ
o CJ
........ > +-
......., 0 +-
CJ t.. -J
o 0 t..
C '+- CJ
E CJ t
CJ ...0 ::
If)...2 t..
CJ 0 0
-c>CJ
+- 0 '->
o
+-
C
CJ
-0
tn
CJ
CL
o
o
.-l
.-l
-0
5 CJ
CJ +-
t.. tn ........
C 0 v
o ," CJ
+- -c N
o +-
+- tn +-
CJ ~
...0 U
o t..
-c ~
CJ 0
t.. ~
t..
C
o
+-
o
>
o
C
CJ
CL
0Cl
.-l
-
t.. 0 t:
o +- 0
tn t..
C ""R ti
o c CJ
+- 01-0
0._ CJ
> tn 0..
o CJ
C-o
CJ
t..
o
CJ
t..
'c;(
CJ C
+- ...0 0
C ...0
CJ t..
E -0 ~
0..::1
o 0
- -c
~ tn C
CJ 0 +-
-0 tn t:
C CJ
:: 0 E
CJ tn CJ C
cc+-~
>-2..0
C x ~ f
'c;( CJ u CJ
t.. 0 C
o +- 0
t..
:g-o+-
o CJ tn
C CJ
+- 01-0
o '_ CJ
> tn 0..
o CJ
C-o
CJ
t..
CJ t:
+- ...0 0
C ...0
CJ t..
E -0 ~
o..~
o 0
CJ-C
> tn t:
CJ 0 +-
-0 tn C
C CJ
~ 0 E
CJ tn CJ C
cc+-o
>- 2.. 0 '>~
C X ~ C
'c;( CJ u CJ
...0
o
CJ
t..
'c;(
t:
o
+-
o
CJ
t..
U
CJ
CL
0\
.-l
+- >-
o CJ
-C-c
+- +-
>--0
o C
:: 0
I
'+-
o t..
I 0
tn...o
+- t..
-co-o
01-c C
t.. 0
-0
CJ
t:
o
+-
CJ
t..
CJ
...0
-0
~
o
-c
tn
CJ
Vl-C
-o+-
o +-
-c 0
~-o
.- C
'-> CJ
I
CJ -0
-c 0
f-~
o
CJ -0 0
...0 C CJ
o a
CJ
:: +-
Vl C
o
o..c
E 0 Vl
o +- 0
C:L. 0
CJ
t..
U
CJ
t..
+-
o
o
en
-0
CJ
N
C
01
o
Vl u
o CJ
t..
e
-0
CJ
>
o
t..
0..
E
Vl+-
+- 'Cl
U-c
CJ +-
'-""")
o
t..
0..
d
C
...2t
0.. -c
+-
~ ~
..g ~
~t
'<::) ~
.:.:::::<.,
C:l ~
~~
it)' -+-;:
,tu ~
<::) "
.:.::::: ~
C:l ~
~"t)
2 ~
~~
~--s
~~
tu ~
it) t....
~~
-+-;: "t) ti
~ ~ ~
~ ..Q "
,~ ~ ~
i-.. ~, ,C:l
::t3i5i;)
g ~ ~
~ Sl...
~~Lt
o
CJ
o
C
E -0 C
CJ ~ CJ 0
If) 0 ...0 t
+- 0
C t..
o +-
E ~ t
CJ
-c
f-
o
tn
+-
o C
+- CJ
C E
CJ CJ
-0 CJ
Vl
CJ
t..
CJ
Vl
~
C
o
t..
C +-
o Vl
+- CJ
c-o
o CJ
U 0..
CJ
01
o
-0 3
:: ~ 0
CJ 0 U
Z-cc
tn CJ
CJ
o
U
Vl
I
CJ
01
t..
o
-0
~
01
CJ'-I--..:::e:
...0 0 t..
o
0..
-0
~ C
o 0 tn
-c +- 0
Vl -0 ~
0.. -0 0
E 0
o
C:L.
CJ
-c
+- +-
o
o
en
U
t: ~
U ,_
'- 0..
0..0
Vl U
o~
C
o
0-0
Vl C
o
-0
CJ
C
o
+-
CJ
t..
CJ
...0
>-
o
E
-c
+--c
~ :: ~
C Vl -g
o
Vl Vl
t: CJ
CJ-c
E U
CJ C
CJ
CJ ...0
E-o
CJ CJ
If) >
o
CJ t..
-co..
f- E
...0
frf'ffff.......~t~~___
e
e
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number: FL 01-06=-25'-'
Agenda Item:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
OWNER:
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
LOCATION:
302 North Osceola Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval to increase the permitted height
from 50 feet to 150 feet for attached dwellings in the Downtown
District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project.
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Northside Engineering
Architectural plans submitted by Harvard, Jolly, Clees & Toppe
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE: 1.07 acres; 46,609 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 155 feet of width by 167 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
PLAN CATEGORY: CDB, Central Business District Classification
ZONING DISTRICT: D, Downtown District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Attached dwellings
West: Clearwater Bay
East: Social/public service agency
South: Attached dwellings
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: High-density residential and assorted commercial uses dominate
the immediate vicinity.
Page 1
--
e
ANALYSIS:
The rectangular site is 1.07 acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue,
approximately 200 feet north of Jones Street. The site is located within an older, residential
portion of ~~..~.i~i~)T lo?~ted directly along Clearwater Bay. There is an existing square foot,
two story i..JJ.~ti~.ttr1 dwelling with resi~~l1tial units. The buildingi~..logat~.~.:~tmc:
northeast ' c~;;;~r~fth~ . ;it~. There is a second, g-square foot, one-story~tti~IIII~~;1
dwelling with units located at the southeast comer of the site. The existing stmctures will be
demolished with this proposal. The site is generally, heavily wooded and has a steep slope
mnning east west starting at sea level and rising to 27 feet.
History of Land Use Regulations
The CBD land use plan category and the adopted Redevelopment Plan govern development
within the CBD, Central Business District. A redevelopment plan for downtown was originally
adopted in 1981; the current redevelopment plan was approved in 1995. In both 1993 and 1995,
areas on the periphery of the Redevelopment Area were evaluated for their relationship with the
Redevelopment Area, the appropriate land uses for the periphery areas and possible future
inclusion in the Redevelopment Area.
In October 1993, the City Commission approved the Periphery Plan. The Periphery Plan
analyzed land use patterns and redevelopment opportunities for four areas to the northeast,
northwest, southeast and southwest of the existing Redevelopment Area (a copy of Periphery
Plan is attached). The Osceola Bay Club property is located within the northwest periphery area
as discussed on pages 3-5 of the Periphery Plan. The Plan proposed several actions including:
. Amend the Land Use Plan from the various plan categories to the CBD land use plan
category for all of the property in the four periphery areas.
. Rezone the northeast and southeast periphery areas to "old Code" zoning districts Urban
Center (Transition) and Urban Center (Easter Corridor), respectively.
. Rezone the northwest and southwest periphery areas to a new zoning district entitled
"Downtown! Mixed Use". A draft of the new district was attached to the Periphery Plan.
. Add these areas to the Redevelopment Area and designate their land use potential through the
Redevelopment Plan.
The City Commission approved the Periphery Plan and it was subsequently reviewed and
approved by the Pinellas Planning Council as a special area plan with conditions. Special area
plans are allowed to supplement existing land use and zoning categories when applied to specific
areas of the City. The land use plan amendment was approved and all of the four periphery areas
are designated as Central Business District on the land use plan. In addition, the northeast and
southeast periphery areas were rezoned to the old zoning districts of Urban Center (Transition
and Eastern Corridor). Later, these were changed to the Downtown District under the new Code.
Page 2
--
e
The Downtown! Mixed Use District was approved by the City Commission; however, this
district was never applied to the northwest and southwest periphery areas and they remained
zoned according to the existing districts. When the new Community Development Code was
implemented in 1999, these two areas were rezoned to the district most similar to their old
zoning classification (instead of the Downtown District that matches the land use plan category
of CBD).
The Periphery Areas are unique in the City as the administration of their long-term development
potential is guided by several documents that must be combined to reach a land use conclusion.
Since the Osceola Bay Club site is included in the northwest periphery area, the goals of this area
were used to evaluate the project. The Periphery Plan recognized the Osceola Bay site as an
underutilized site and appropriate for redevelopment. The Plan also encouraged multi-family
residential uses in the northwest area and specifically encouraged high-rise residential use along
Clearwater Bay. The Design and Zoning section of the Periphery Plan (page 5) states:
"It would seem appropriate to allow tall residential structures in this area in order to
promote the scenic views of Clearwater Bay."
Based on the redevelopment goal of the Periphery Plan, the current Downtown zoning district,
the site characteristics and surrounding uses, the Planning staff believes that the site is
appropriate for high-rise residential development. Redevelopment is encouraged and residents
are a critical component of an economically healthy full-time downtown.
Osceola Bay Site Plan Summary
The site was the subject of a previous Flexible Development application (FL 00-01-03) which
included additional parcels to the north extending between Jones and Georgia Streets and from
North Osceola Avenue to the Bay. That proposal included a request to permit 150 attached
dwellings, as a Residential Infill Project, with 1) an increased height from 30 feet to 174 feet, and
2) an increase in density to 45 dwelling units per acre (50 dwelling units per acre permitted in the
Periphery Plan); and permit a six-foot fence within the front setback along Osceola Avenue,
Jones Street and Georgia Street, and partial vacation and relocation of Osceola Avenue right-of-
way, from Jones Street to Georgia Street. That application was tentatively approved by the CDB
on June 20,2000 pending legal acquisition of all subject parcels and the vacation and subsequent
relocation of North Osceola Avenue. The zoning district at that time was HDR, Hioh Density
Residential District. The City Commission changed the zoning to D, Downtown on , (ttl'~
Due to acquisition difficulties the development has been reduced in scale and includes
only the current, subject site. The previous application has been withdrawn and the current
application submitted in place. The City Commission did not finalize the vacation of North
Osceola Avenue.
Page 3
It
.
The applicant seeks to increase the permitted height of an attached dwelling from 50 feet to 150
feet. The proposal includes 25 attached dwellings within one building. Th~J2Eoposed building
will be located between 25 and 115 feet from any property line and ~ feet from any
surrounding structure. Two levels of underground parking ';:,~~lg~~r~~i~~~~~~,;:ill include 50
spaces. Access to the site is proposed along Osceola Avenue !i~~!im!mfil~~~,!!.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, barrel tile roof,
and a significant number of windows and balconies on all elevations. The terracotta color clay
roof tile has been desi ed to minimize views of the mechanical equipment and incorporates the
use of . All proposed signage will meet current Code requirements.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN
THE PERIPHERY PLAN:
ST ANDARD
DENSITY
(dwelling units
er acre)
REQUIRED/
PERMITTED
25 dwelling units
(25 du/ac)
EXISTING
PROPOSED IN
COMPLIANCE?
25 dwelling Yes
units
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN THE D, DOWNTOWN DISTRICT:
Determined by
the community
development
coordinator
based on the
specific use
and/or ITE
Manual standards
* The minimum development standards for attached dwellings are 1 - 1.5 parking spaces per
unit (25 - 38 spaces). The applicant has provided 50 spaces, exceeding the minimum
requirements
C.
STANDARD
HEIGHT
maximum
PARKING
SPACES
minimum
PERMITTED/
REQUIRED
N/A
EXISTING
PROPOSED
IN
COMPLIANCE?
Yes
150 feet
~r'""ac~
;'o~!'"m?.. '0 ' ,0 "
50 spaces
Yes*
Page 4
e
e
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECTS:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from intensity and development
standards.
The land use of the site is Central Business District (CBD). The maximum height
permitted in the Downtown District is 150 feet provided that the site is located along
Clearwater Bay, is south of Drew Street, North of Court Street and west of Myrtle
Avenue. The site meets all of these requirements with the exception of being located
550 feet north of Drew Street.
The applicant had presented a similar project to the CDB on June 20, 2000. A tentative
approval was granted pending the vacation of North Osceola Avenue. The City
Commission has not finalized this vacation request. The previous application included
two condominium towers with a height of 174 feet and 150 units. The project has been
scaled back in scope to a smaller parcel and a single building of 150 feet in height and
25 units.
Height is measured from the mean elevation (14 feet) of existing grade. The site slopes
steeply towards Clearwater Bay with a grade differential of 27 feet. Using the
Downtown maximum height allowance of 150 feet and the allowance for the mean
elevation of 14 feet, the staff supports an effective project height of 136 feet. The
applicant, as previously noted, is requesting 150 feet. Overall, the structure, site plan
and design are consistent with the intent of the Downtown District. Additional upscale
residential dwellings are an important component of a healthy mix of uses in this area.
This use will also stabilize and support other service uses nearby.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties.
The proposed complex will stabilize and likely enhance property values in the area. The
current assessed valuation of the site is ,l With the redevelopment proposal,
the assessed valuation is projected at < This increase in property value is
expected to have a beneficial effect on surrounding properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are otherwise
permitted in the District.
The City of Clearwater permits attached dwelling uses. The site is currently zoned
Downtown (D) District, and the use is permitted within that classification.
Page 5
e
.
4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project
are compatible with adjacent land uses.
Adjacent land uses are predominantly attached residential. Many ofthe structures in the
area are mid-rise attached dwellings. The proposed condominium complex is
specifically geared to take advantage of the views of the waterfront and Clearwater Bay.
It is also intended to aid in the revitalization of the downtown area. This location
provides a unique opportunity to redevelop a portion of Clearwater Bay that is currently
underutilized.
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses with the
comprehensive in fill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater.
The site is located in a residential area on the edge of central downtown Clearwater.
The site, uniquely located directly on Clearwater Bay, is within easy access to the major
north south and east west corridors within the City of Clearwater providing easy access
to and from all parts of the Tampa Bay area. There are no other sites within the City of
Clearwater that are large enough to accommodate the proposed use in as unique
location.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
The development and design of the project will benefit the community both functionally
and aesthetically. The high-quality architecture, attractive amenities and landscape
design will set a new standard for the area. The existing structures in the area are
inconsistent with the zoning, land use and Periphery Plan. Also, the quality of the
existing structures is marginal.
Page 6
-
--
7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole.
Additional residential development is a key component to the success of the downtown.
The proposed development will play an important role in the continuing revitalization of
Downtown Clearwater. The City will benefit by having an attractive building complex
located in a redeveloping area. The proposed condominium buildings and landscape
enhancements, as revised, will significantly improve the site.
The City retained an architect to review the proposed design changes that were
introduced at the May 16, 2000 CDB meeting as part of the original application. The
City's consulting architect has worked with staff and the applicant's architect to modify
the roof treatment and the elevation design. The current proposal, similar to the
previous one and incorporates well articulated, unified elevations
III and coordinated architectural elements.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development will aesthetically improve the immediate area and
Clearwater as a whole. The proposed project reflects the City's vision of urban
character within the Downtown District.
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The minimum requirement for attached dwellings in the D, Downtown District are
between one and 1.5 units per dwelling unit (25 to 38 spaces). The applicant IS
provided two spaces per unit (50 spaces) exceeding the minimum requirements.
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines
in Division 5 of Article 3.
The Mediterranean architecture of the buildings will include neutral-color stucco, a terra
cotta, barrel tile roof, a significant number of windows and balconies, vertical colunms
and flat arches. The terracotta color clay roof tile has been designed to minimize views
of the mechanical equipment and incorporates the use of cupola-type enclosures. The
design of the building complies with the Downtown District design guidelines.
Page 7
-
.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY: Conditions which are imposed by the Community
Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level
One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Although the area is characterized with modest single-family dwellings and mid-rise
attached dwellings, the City's vision of the 1993 Periphery Plan includes a revitalized,
high-density residential extension of downtown. This proposal includes high end
condominiums with amenities. It will hopefully establish a positive redevelopment
precedent for the area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
The site is zoned Downtown District. The proposed development will be in compliance
with that zoning classification. The proposed development will help generate a better
mix of residential and pedestrian uses.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed residential use is pemlitted in the zoning district, and should not create any
adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed development will have an ingress/egress point of access from Osceola
Avenue. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected
intersections or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with and will raise the standards of the
community character of the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal includes the development of a single building with a lqg-foot view corridor
between the nearest structures to the north or south. There will be no adverse effects
generated by the proposed development.
Page 8
-
--
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The application and supporting materials were reviewed by the Development Review Committee
on December 14, 2000. The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for
Flexible Development approval, with the maximum development potential, requirements of
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Projects, and with all applicable standards of the
Community Development Code.
The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to
increase the permitted height from 50 feet to 150 feet for attached dwellings in the Downtown
District, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project for the site at 302 North
Osceola Avenue subject to the following conditions:
2. That the density of the site be limited to 25 dwellings units; and
3. That all signage comply with Code.
Prepared by: Mark 1. Parry, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity
Location Map
Future Land Use Map
Zoning Atlas Map
Application
Traffic Study
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D B\FLEXlPending Applications\Osceola North 302 Osceola Bay ClublOsceola North 302 STAFF
REPORT doc
Page 9
l)
'-.~.
o
-
.
Appendix D
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
SECTION D101
GENERAL
DlO1.l Scope. Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accor-
dance with this appendix and all other applicable requirements
of the International Fire Code.
SECTION D102
REQUIRED ACCESS
Dl02.l Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of
buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire de-
partment apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access
roadwith an asphalt, concrete or other approved .driving sur-
face capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus
weighing at least 75,000 pounds (34050 kg).
SECTION D103
MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS
DI03.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hy-
drant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum
road width shall be 26 feet (7925 mm). See Figure Dlm.I.
28' R
TYP.'
20'
26'
95.' DIAMETER
9\.!l..~PE.:~AG - ..
70' DIAMETER
-CUb.-DE-SAC-
60'~
-:r
L20'
28' R-(
TYP.'
-- 20'
60' HAMMERHEAD
DI03.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10
percent in grade.
Exception: Grades steeper than 10 percent as approved by
the fire chief.
D103.3 Turning radius. The minimum turning radii shall be
detennined by the code official.
Dl03.4 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in
excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) shall be provided with width
and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4.
TABLE D103.4
REQUIREMENTS FOR DEAD-END FIRE
APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
0--150
20
: ~ : i
~. ~l-;;.~
28'R~ 1 I 2U
TYP.' I
-- f.o- 28'
151-500 20
501-750 26
Over 750
For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm.
.~-'20'
. ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE
.. -TO 120'.!i.AM~~RHCAD '.
~
~60'
120' HAMMERHEAD
o
For 51: 1 foot = 304.8 mm.
FIGURE D103.1
DEAD-END FIVE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD TURNAROUND
fiLE
2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE@
TURNAROUNDS REQUIRED
Nonere uired
120 feet "Hammerhead," 60 feet "Y" or
96 feet diameter cul-de-sac in
accordance with Fi ure 0103.1
120 feet Hammerhead, 60 feet "Y" or
96 feet Diameter cul-de-sac in
accordance with Fi llre 0103.1
s
20'..., I
~(
20.3l
..0--- 28'
<'-- 20'
MINIMUM CLEARANCE
AROUNP A FIRE -
.. I:1)'DRANT .--. .
__"; e--. ""'_
28' R
TYP.'
20'
l..
20.3
ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE
TO 120' HAMMERHEAD
A
..,
361
t,D,PENDIX 0
e
DI03.S Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the
fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the follow-
ing criteria:
1. The minimum gate width shall be 20 feet (6096 mm).
2. Gates sha\1 be of the swinging or sliding type.
3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that a\1ow
manual operation by one person.
4. Gate components sha\1 be maintained in an operative
condition at a\1 times and replaced or repaired when de-
fective.
5. Electric gates sha\1 be equipped with a means of opening
the gate by fire department personnel for emergency ac-
cess. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by
the code official.
6. Manual opening gates sha\1 not be locked with a padlock
or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being
opened by means of forcible entry tools and
7. Locking device specifications sha\1 be submitted forap-
prov~l by the code official.
DI03.6 Signs. Where required by the Eode official, fire appara-
tus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO
PARKING-FIRE LANE signs complying with Figure
DI03.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches
(305 mm) wide by 18 inches (457 mm) high and have red letters
on a white reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one
or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section
DI03.6.1 or 0103.6.2.
SIGN TYPE "A" SIGN TYPE "C- SIGN TYPE "0"
NO NO NO -r
PARKING PARKING PARKING
18"
FIRE lANE C~~ FIRE LANE J_
-+
:.-12"---------: ~-12.--1 :---- 12"--1
_.~--~---- . FIGURED103.6 .. .
FIRE lANE SIGNS
DI03.6.1 Roads 20 to 26 feet in width. Fire apparatus ac-
cess roads 20 to 26 feet wide (6096 to 7925 mm) shall be
posted on both sides as a fire lane.
DI03.6.2 Roads more than 26 feet in width. Fire appara-
tus access roads more than 26 feet wide (7925 mm) to 32
feet wide (9754 mm) shall be posted on one side of the road
as a fire lane.
SECTION D104
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS
DI04.l Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet in
height. Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) or
362
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
.
three stories in height shall have at least three means of fire ap-
paratus access for each structure.
DI04.2 Buildings exceeding 62,000 square feet in area.
Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than
62,000 square feet (5760 m2) shall be provided with two sepa-
rate and approved fire apparatus access roads.
Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to
124,000 square feet (11 520 m2) having a single approved
fire apparatus access road when all buildings are equipped
throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems.
DI04.3 Remoteness. Where two access roads are required,
they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one
half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension
of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line
between accesses.
Cj
SECTION 0105
AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
DIOS.l \Vherenquired. Buildings or portions of buildings or
facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) in height above the low-
est level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided
with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accom-
modating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility
and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire appa-
ratus access roadway.
c
DIOS.2 Width. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a mini-
mum unobstructed width of26 feet (7925 mm) in the immedi-
ate vicinity of any building or portion of building more than 30
feet (9144 mm) in height.
DlOS.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required ac-
cess routes meeting this condition shall be located within a
minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet
(9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel
to one entire side of the building:
. ~. .. ,. ~SECTION 0106 .,'
- 'MULTIPCE_~FA~ILY.BE.SrOENTIAL 'DEVl::LOPM.E,~.f$' _ ~~_.
-- - '--.- -,.,. ". .' ,
DI06.1 Projects having more than 100 dwelling units. Mul-
tiple-family residential projects having more than 100 dwelling
units shall be equipped throughout with two separate and ap-
proved fire apparatus access roads.
Exception: Projects having up to 200 dwelling units may
have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all
buildings, including nonresidential occupancies, are
equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler
systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or
903.3.1.2 of the lntemational Fire Code.
DI06.2 Projects having more than 200 dwelling units. Mul-
tiple-family residential projects having more than 200 dwelling
units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire ap-
paratus access roads regardless of whether they are equipped
with an approved automatic sprinkler system.
-,-------.;'
2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE@
'~\
(.-j
8
~.'.
v
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADe
APPENDIX 0
-
!
f
SECTION 0107
ONE- OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENTS
DI07.1 One- or two-family dwelling residential develop-
ments. Developments of onc- or two-family dwellings where
the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with
separate and approved fire apparatus access roads, and shall
meet the requirements of Section DI04.3.
Exceptions:
1. Where there are 30 or fewer dwelling units on a single
public or private access way and all dwelling units are
protected by approved residential sprinkler systems,
access from two directions shall not be required.
2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire appara-
tus access road shall not be increased unless fire appa-
ratus access roads will connect with future
development, as determined by the code official.
.-
.:.~... .
2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE@
363
ilia
.& uiles
e
HorFLS
May 29, 2003
RE.CENEO
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
pJ\R1t-At=.N1
pLAN N \ NfGCO\...~ tJ",,\!'Jp.-:t'C.B
Cn'< 0 .-'
Dear Mrs. Tarapani:
My name is Sean Clouden, and 1 am the new Project Manager for the Osceola Bay development.
We have a development order (Case #: FL 01-06-25) at 304 North Osceola Avenue. This letter
is to expire on August 21 S\ 2003.
We are asking that it be extended another 12 months, as we are preparing to break ground on this
project shortly.
Sean CIouden
Project Manager
LM (Q\cUD3
~~
Matrix Lodging, LLC and Affiliated Companies
8 South Fort Harrison Ave. Clearwater, Florida 33756
Tel (727) 446-3000 Fax (727) 469-8800 esuiteshotesl.com
I
.
Fierce, Lisa
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Fierce, Lisa
Thursday, June 05, 2003 10:31 AM
'sean@esuiteshotels.com'
Gerlock, Frank; Parry, Mark
request for time extension - osceola bay club
hi sean, this is in response to your request for a 12 month time extension for the osceola bay club project at 304 osceola
avenue (fl 01-06-25). a time extension has already been granted for that project which is set to expire on august 21, 2003.
per code, time extensions may be granted for one year and only within the original period of validity.
please call or email should you have specific questions
Lisa L. Fierce
Assistant Planning Director
City of Clearwater - Planning Department
lfierce @clearwater-fl.com
727.562.4561 phone
727.562.4865 fax
Buckeye and Buccaneer Fan
GO BUC(K)S!
1
.,
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
June 20,2002
Ms. Joanne Fuchs, President
Matrix Development
8 South Fort Harrison Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33756
r~"'" f:'; "~ 'r>.>~';:
~~E_':~~:~
''-;',>8'~'
RE: Development Order regarding time extension for case F~t 304 North
Osceola Avenue
Dear Ms. Fuchs:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community
Development Code. On August 21,2001, the Community Development Board approved
your application for Flexible Development to increase the permitted height from 50 feet
to 150 feet for attached dwellings in the Downtown District. The proposal includes a
71,000 square-foot, IS-story, 25-unit condominium building. The application was
approved with five conditions:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density of the site be limited to 25 dwellings units;
3. That Stormwater Management requirements to be met in accordance with Code, prior
to issuance of building permits;
4. That a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Department cOlmections be installed
on the exterior (street side) of the proposed six-foot wall, prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy; and
5. That all signage comply with Code.
The application was valid for one year to expire on August 21,2002. Your request for a
one-year time extension was approved by the Community Development Board on June
18, 2002, with the same, five conditions. An application for a building permit shall be
made within one year of the time extension approval (August 21, 2003). All required
certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the
date of the building permit.
BRIAN J. AU;\GST, IvL\YOR-COMMISSIONER
ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITi\EY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
HoYT J.-L~MILTON, COMMISSIONER ~9 BILL]ONSO'i, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT k'iD AFrIIUvLi\TIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
June 19,2002
Fuchs - Page Two
Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the
construction of the project. Should you have any questions, please call the Wayne M.
Wells, AICP, Senior Planner, at 727-562-4504.
V ery trul~ !So/rs,
Op;dtZd;t:t1dfZ:l0~
Cynthia Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFlexlJnnactive or Finished ApplicationslOsceola N 304 Osceola Bay Club _ ApprovedlOsceola N
304 Development Order - time extension.doc
. --
UI es
-e
HOTELS
May 17,2002
Mr. Wayne Wells
City of Clearwater
Planning & Development Services
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
RE: Development Order regarding case FL 01-06-25
302 North Osceola Avenue
Dear Mr. Wells:
Thank you for taking the time to speak with us this morning.
As mentioned, we respectfully request an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year to submit an
application for building permit per our Community Development Board approval of August 21,2001.
Several factors have hampered our ability to move forward stennning from the loss of our original funding
source as affected by the world events of9-11. We are securing new financial vehicles and re-thinking our core
and shell design as it relates to the needs of the buildings occupants. It is my understanding that approximately
eighteen (18) of the available twenty-five (25) units have interested owners and therefore require custom
interior design and fit outs.
We will make sure that the conditions of approval as defined in our approval letter dated August 31,2001 are
adhered to and we feel confident that all of the necessary submittals for the permit application will be complete
within the next several months.
Our request for an extension is made within the original period of validity and your cooperation is greatly
appreciated.
We look forward to your favorable response and to providing another valuable project to the downtown district.
Vd'rulyYours, r----
k'~~pre~~
Matrix Development
encl
Matrix Lodging, LLC and Affiliated Companies
8 South Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756
Tel (727) 446-3000 Fax (727) 469-8800 eSuitesHotels.com
r
-
.
C I T Y 0 F
CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, ClEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MCClICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVE;':UE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33-:'S6
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RA,"iGE PLANNI0:G
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
HOUSING DMSIO:'-l
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
August 31,2001
Ms. Joanne Fuchs
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 240
Clearwater, FL 33755
RE: Development Order regarding case FL 01-06-25 at 302 North Osceola Avenue
Dear Ms. Fuchs:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206 D.6 of the
Community Development Code. On August 21, 2001, the Community Development
Board reviewed your application to increase the permitted height from 50 feet to 150 feet
for attached dwellings in the Downtown District. The proposal includes a 71,000 square
foot, IS-story, 25-unit condominium building. Based on the application and the staff
recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPRQVED the
application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Proj ect.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the general
applicability criteria.
3. The application is consistent with the Northwest Periphery Area in the Periphery Plan.
4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
BRIAN J. AUr-;GST, MAYOR-COMMISSIOr-;ER
ED H,\RT. VICE 'vlAYOR-CO\\MISSIONER WHITr-;EY GRAY. CO\\\\lSSIO:\ER
HoYT HA.\\ll.To:\. CO\lMIS'iIONER * BILLJON:;ON. CO.\j\\l:;SIONER
"L"-1!" 'j:;'~ADfnV"1r.:\lT ,\:'\.In Ar.l;lRMATTVJ7 ArTTrT"-! F'IAPTriVl:P"
-
.
e
August 31, 2001
Fuchs - Page 2
Conditions of approval:
1. That the final design of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted or as modified by the CDB;
2. That the density of the site be limited to 25 dwellings units;
3. That Stormwater Management requirements to be met in accordance with Code, prior
to issuance of building permits;
4. That a new fire hydrant assembly and new Fire Department connections be installed
on the exterior (street side) of the proposed six-foot wall, prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy; and
5. That all signage comply with Code.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one
year of Flexible Development approval (August 21,2002) and all required certificates of
occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building
permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Th~"~q!J.1!llg,I1ity
Development130'!Tcf.lnay grant an~)(tension oftiIlle for ..<1.. period hot to exceed one year
and only within the original period of validity,. .. ... ......,
." "-..--
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the
necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In
order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please
bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require
this prior development approval.
In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible
Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the
subject of the approval within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an
application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final
determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on September 4,
2001.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark Parry, Planner at 562-4558.
Very truly yours,
~~
fbv Gerald Figurski, Chairman
Community Development Board
""'7 ~4!)ls-
S:\Planning DepartmenllC D BiFLE'(\Pending App/icationslOsceola Nonh 302 Osceola Bay C/ub I Osceola North 302
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
~
0,,"
o '"
"" bO
'"
<')P-.
..... I
~~
b00
~~
0:::
~
f-<
~
~
0:::
~
~
>--1
~
~
"'
Cl
'"
CO Q
~ G:
~ cr:-\!J
00 ~ r,;
~ ~ ~
~~~
~ dO r:::'
~ ~ ~- 2-
:2: rZ s: ~
~ :;;- -;;; ""
~ f- C
[;J ~ r:
Q~;S~
CJUS'T
Z 00- 0 ""1
Z '<j"< U) ~
~ f'- g r:=:'
'<:t" ,....., N
t5 6t:::,
c... PJ 2; ~
:..cl ..... 0
u 5 ::r::
6 c::l ~
o~
8 ~
"-<Vi
u
~
o
>-<
f-<
>--<
u
.
'"
~
':Z
"t;;
>
'"
"
"
>
8
S '"d ro
'M ~ 'H
1:1. 'Eo
~~ .8 g
o '" '"
U .n fil
~ a.~
.~ '~.8
8 ~ 8
& S 'I::
"1:i 0 0.
i) 0
UJ ~ ~ ~
,";:; ~ a i!:
S ';: ~-o
~ u:l 0) ArB
~ .s ~ Q .~
'U:; ~,.o 0) VJ
8 ~.8 .;:: '"d
U "'d (fJ ~ ~
v VJ5 ~&
~ 68 ~2
bJ)........... CI.) "0 p..,
~ ~ ] 's 8 ] ri
... U .~ g" b:: -g
l5~E':u;"So u
] ~] ~.~ ~ ~ '"8 -B
.......,.0 0) 5 5 ~ ~ ~.~
~"2'~ bJ)O"....... UJ 6'>-
..... ro bJ) J;:l ....... .........-
51 ~ .:S a .5 ~ ~ 8. ~
'U:j 0 t,..., ~:s! >-. t) ;:j 8
~~tB]~~8~
'@ ro 'Uj ~ 4-, l+:: 'C ~ ro
,EJ i) 5 ~ ~ ". EO@,
'+-( '"d '"d r:: 0 [) >< 2......
!1)2v-8~~d.)~~
o:S.~.sUJ:::l ro Cl.)tp Clj
~ ] ~ ~ .~ ro ~ 'B ~
PfilPpsP[3up
"
E
57
o
~
o
o
'"
-B
-B
'~
'"
'H
o
I!J
.,g
:a
~
o
U
....;
NM
..,.:
o
o
N
~^
<')
en
"
b1l
"
~
~
[)
z
Cl
::s
::l~
>-1N
OJ
:::: .t::
'" "
SCI)t.n
0...... V)
o '" r--
.B~~~
SO Il) CI)
r~ Q ~ ~
I-"-i >-. H i-'-l
0) ~ ~ [)
~ '" [; '"
~]u~
~8~o
'"
'"
~ ~ ~
z ;>, z w
:ii "" 0 Ul
~~~8
;~~~
~oZp:,
(),....l;n:r:
6~6~
~Q"'Z
~1Jgfo@
o ~;a'~ ~
.5 ~...... s (1)
;@~.Ea@
i!: 'M '" O"1:i
O)if3U~
'"d o4-i (1) U
S]Op~
~'S 8 B
~ [~ en "0
ro [/J 6J 1=:1
.g c;j.~ I:: "'d
.t:: '"d 4-! g '5
E&~",o.
KN~.2: ro
bl)O '"'d ~ c.8
Ef;~
..:::: .,....... 8 ~
]N~g'E
~ ~~:€~
tS:::l>'~ob
= <r:: 0 Il) 'm:-8
'E~S~~~
ro >- ,..... ~ 1< 4-1
~ ~:E 0 : ~
~ g.'~ 0 .g
g ;:; ~ ::: ~ &
r--" S .5 .g 6D]
~ g..s ~ ~'5b
I a).g 0 E.t::
"T > S 0
5 o]~] ~
,~q 0 ""
t)~7Jo.a:lc;
~ :9 ~ .s ~ :B
s Jj >>f-; 11 '~
8E:g~5'~
,=' 0 0........ a) 5
~aGE~'d
~ g; g ~o a
vi
t,~
12
o
:z,
<'l'
q
C"j
...
'"
vi
'"
-.b
s:
CJ
>-1
'"
g
oj
u
on
~
:a
....
oj
b1l
'"
....
....
OJ
"1:i
o
.~ ,;....J...1-
~
OJ
[
o
"
>
OJ
q
~
'"
"
"
"
>
~
oj
'0
OJ
u
8
~
u
~
~
!::
"
q
] E ~ .~
~ . ll) &
o]p,~
~.~.- ......
~&~~
~ ~ 8 :
il) 0 0.. Il)
~~g.~
~s~~
:~~~
Il)....c:,..o iZl
o ........ '1::l'>-I
'"d ;a.2 E
~ ~ a3 (1)
"Et)~~
o oj "
E a ~ ~
(1) ...... ~ 0
[2~ ~
~ ~ b'~
~ 2...-;:: 0..
.0868-
tI) ~ [[5
:B
~.~ 2~
~ 8.~ 5
o co 0 >...........:
8.S 8 ..c ~
;:j '"Cl ~.::;: 0
.~ ~ g ~ ~
] ~.~ .2 ~
........,..... ] E
~ 8.,g 0)
.s .S ~ ~ [
~.EEt;~
~O:s>>>
"'0000..8
(1) ~~ u I-;
~ .~ -2 C';S .g
, ;a [) bI) p.
~ ~ ~ 'S :E
P-; ~ 0 ,..0 __
.s~d)e~.B
lHS~g.tJ
o 5''-n VI t!.) Q
\Oa)~g>:B~
Q~20~]o
\Oq"r--oj~
~>.~ros~
~~~~'-g<
~ ~ 8].~
'E8~]];2Q
u 0 __...... ~ .0
",u--"" U
CI) (1).~ u.l ] '-'
o....c:oO__
........ ......,,~ 85]
~ ,......., t!.) 0.. 0
("Jg.B~'8,:Q
~NS~~
s.r;i ~'::ij g ~
~u.l.5'~~g.E
8 ~ ~ .~ 3 0 5
~ 2 D'5 6 (.)
~,Qg~.D.o@
~ u .-. ~ ,'~ .:& ~
.3D~~~~~
0'""0 0 0 8 .3...c
[; ~O '.;:J.o 0 ::: co
QU~(1)'"ClP:::
~ ~ -B 5 8 .~
en ~ f5: ,S u rS
2:::~U') ]:2
,~ ~ 5 gj'" ..... u
-::~ ~StA ".;j
0) "d \0 M Q ,.....
[3 q OJ i!: >;.8 ~
u>>~~....'iji!:
. "-''-'-8'Q~
~ > en..... 0
~ \0 U ,;.., ~ '.g,
~ l= ~,~ '" ~ 0
v:. :: ~ -: o:..!:::;
~8~~]8~
~
-0
-5 JJ'~
.~ 0
o '~~
ti ~ cj
~~ ifi ~
~~~ 3~E
......... 0 u.~ 0 .5
~ ~...... E.~ '=E
~ s en '6 5 ~ :::
~ ~ ] .o'-g S 1)
o~o",u_[
SCJ s:B~~ 0
5.~ a.~ g.~ ~
~t@]~~]]
f-;,.o:;f-;ojf-;f-;....
~ 1J &" 'T^
;s......~t.S1-;
~ 00 0 ]
~ r5 .5 ~ 5
"@~iEbIJfr
> ;> '" ,EJ G'l
8 f'P 11 [3
~ 8, ~ 8, 1)
2.S: ~.5-.
~~'G.~~
~ >:B.g 'u
'" 'M
~ ,S' ~"O ~
o......uJJ~~
HE 0 B
ro~::~5
~~ot)~
::: 1) (1) 10-,
~ o~~~
5:€~ 03
co 0 ~...c 't::
o..~ ....... 0
8[~q=
...... co q~ a3
6>..0.-5:
,..c "T ~ co
1) ""d ,.......... '7n 0
I-; 1) ~ ~
~'~:B2~
: :8'~ 5: g
,..0 o'"@ co ~
~~e~]
I:':l ro p. 1) +-'
~ S ~.~ ~
o..'Z'ooc;
~:f ~ ~ -s .S:
:€[~.~2
"0..8 U ~'~
~ 0 Q),~ c:""';
~B];n8
..s q fil oj "0 C',
OJ
'0
9
]
6'
o
U
oj
'I::
'B
o
OJ
"
a
o
"
>
u
q
~
.D
'x
'"
iI:
.B
1~
;;-
o
R
oj
~
uo
i;?
P3
--
'8
;::
[j
cIJ
u
~
, ....
s~
E:o
~8
M "
P..~
'5 ]
P-.
~ '0-<
~ :::
,s]
o :-:
;z i:5
c@
1) bl)
"&,s
l~ "Q
Po; S
o
~ t:
~ ~
5.5
z
g?
~
,~
2
o
U
o
-B
.6
en
....
~
0i M-o:i
00
V)
V)
"T
N
\0
V)
"t;;
....
~
oj
;:;::
&
oj
P-.
-t'!
~
"
o
S
"
.~
"
--"
-0
"
o
"1:i
g
oj
~
i3^
.~
OJ
;oj
0"
>>
"
oj
'"
>
.2
"
~
::;
"2
oj
o
~iCQ
fil
'M S
oj 0.
--" 0
u"
:Q ~
~q
" >>
oo.t::
,~ "
~ "
;g a
e S
'" 0
ciU
'l
~
""
;:
:i'
i
c;
'9
G
E'
'"
~
~
~
"
'"
!~
~~
2h
n
~~
f~
Q.
~
"
'"
Q
~
~
e
~
Q
~
"
"
0':
2:j
;: z
o co
~ ;
uu
9.-
';:f
~
~
~
.:;::
~
~
L:;
<
~
<
:2
~
"
~
@<
z
<
z
<
z _
~i~
J~
,. ;::
>- ~
;;::r:
:e
:r:
~
~
~,
-
--
CITY OF CLEARWATER
NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday,
August 21,2001, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South
Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests:
NOTE: Allversons wishinrz to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meetinrz. Those cases
that are not contested bv the avplicant, staff neirzhborinrz propertv owners, etc. will be placed on a consent arzenda
and avvroved bv a sinrzle vote at the berzinning of the meeting.
1. Countryside Joint Venture / City National Bank of Florida. Trustee are requesting a flexible development
approval to permit a 6 ft high fence with gate in the required front setback along McMullen Booth Rd (Proposed
Use: a 6 ft high ornamental, perimeter fence/gate as part of an existing multi-family development) at 2652
McMullen Booth Rd., The Vinings at Countryside, Lot 1. FL 01-05-22
2. Houle Industries. Inc. are requesting a flexible development approval to reduce the minimum lot width from
150 ft to 125 ft, reduce the front (north) setback along Dolphin Point from 25 ft to 4 ft, reduce the rear (south)
setback from 15 ft to 0 ft and to increase the height from 30 ft to 50 ft, as part of a Residential Infill Project
(Proposed Use: a 9 unit condominium building) at 211-217 Dolphin Point, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 5-
A, Lots 10-11. FL 01-06-23
3. Malcolm & Beverley Croft / Bennett & Harriett Weber (Osceola Bay Development, LLC) are requesting a
flexible development approval to increase the height of an attached dwelling development from 50 ft to 150 ft, as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Proposed Use: a 25 unit condominium development) at
304-308 Osceola Ave., Sec. 09-29-15, M&B 43.06, and Clovis C. Lutz, Lots A & B. FL 01-06-25
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning and
Development Services Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by
the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose,
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105.
All individuals speaking on public hearing items will be sworn in.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by
interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning and
Development Services Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756, or call 562-4567.
Lisa Fierce
Planning and Development Services
City of Clearwater
P,O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
City Clerk
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN
500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK DEPT. ANY
PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO
PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE CITY CLERK DEPT WITH THEIR
REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090.
Ad: 08/04/01
..
o Id Lle(Aru.~kr ~ tJe;:jhk:ov heed
4S.SDC~0----+-( 61'\... r\ '\ '
I'Y\,. :Ten YyjC-k.\"n et J ,rE'S"1 clCJ'
I Z 44- \{ e()e::.+ ICV\ Po ~ A+ to r.
Cltt-LrtAX-c+-cfj CL 3'3755
H~b01 B \ ()~ s c,('.J:),::;\-er--\ V"'On -\-
Corda T\\ \ n\ \J.'Y'I A-SSOCClo.-:-+{ c:')v\,.
r(\ 1-, \-le.v-VY\Cl....vtVl 3+-.. ij el.<--D k-:l ._
f.oC)O N, Os ceo \ C<... M- \J c:. '~ { 0 S
CJ ~A-r-c0::ckr J t= L '::'3/55
S (~L.. \i l'i T I 0 i.....! (Cl F::~ r"i \('
PO BO)( no'?()
C L.. E () h~ I..,..II::~:I T E: r:~ FL..
:5 ~S '/ E, E~ E:~; () }" ()
UPE:E:::i\! COF;~t'..!Eh~ IHC
:i. 3.5 C~ [; t.,.! -f h~ PI L. (::, \i E::
ST PE:::TE:::RSBUPU FL
::5 :~5 )' () .1 ::57' ():5
CHUPCH OF SCIE:::HTOLOGY
FLAU SE:::PVICE::: ORG IHC
::. () ;~:; C L.. EVE L I~~ ,..,! [) S T
CL.E(:IRI..',,1(~lTEj? FL.
~5 :5 "7 .~::l .::1 (,:1- () () ";l
BELVEDERE::: APTS OF CLW INC
300 H OSCEOLA AVE
C: L. C: (;:i F~ ~'.,I PI T E: h~ F: L.
:;S :::~; "7 E5, !::;l :~; '9 i4 (;1
RASCHIDI. FAPHAD
300 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 1 C
C: L. C: (i Fi. hi ('I "r E: R F:' L_
:?;; :3 7' ~:'~1.5 :;~~ ~) .1. ~l(
l'IE~L.L.E:R" !.II..JBF:h:T (:,
300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 2 C
C:: L. [ (:, h~ 'i.! ATE R F:' L..
::5 ::~; "7.:;1 .~s ::5 ~) .1 (;J
.
OSCeO!C-L ~v 'Deve!op"YICfct:j lLC
I
4ml ~ :J OCLvl n e.. I:=' u c..h s > ,L '
001 CleveJQVlct sf. :;'Ui ,-L. d'f6
C_(-eCUIU-~rj FL_ "3 ::3 705
FL. OI-6~-Z5 (J~B 8'-Z,f~161
~;A l U I KJ '7 F)
i"i C) P F~~ I :3/"1 I L.. L I i",J C;
PC) [30>( (;)(,.0
:3T F) I::f E: F:;: ::::; 131.) r:.:~ (1 F L
:5 ::~; ~/ (~; .1. () (,;1 6, ()
c:: F::: 0 FT., i"'i {~ L C () L I'"
1"',,1 FB C F:::" 13E: i,.!t.,,! I:: T T /"
601 IHDUSTRIAL RD
c:: (:, F~ L. ~:~:T ,~:, [)f i"',! ,}
CI} ()} 2: 1. (" 1.1.
GAHGELHOFF. DAVID J
405 H FORT HAFi.PISON AVE
C:: L" E~ n h~ 1/,,1 (If I:: I~~ F~: L.
:5 ?; ~?' ES .~~I ;S t.:~) () ~::1
SI-I {:\ L L., I t"'1 p, H P E (',! ,T 'y" I ,".,J""/ I i"~ C
300 H OSCI::OLA AVI:: ~ 1 8
C:L"E(~PI;.J()I TE:P F.. L.
:::s :::~; "/ S' .~I 7; '91. (:.
E':EfF:::3" G01',IZ(ILCl
300 N OSCEOLA nVE ~ 2-8
CLCnnl/.,1r:'ITE:n Fl."
::~; ?) 7' .~S f:~1 :~;; '9 .1 (Sl
II C: Ii',! C: 'y'" i'1 I C:: l'l'~~1 E L"
411 CLEVELAND ST ~ 133
C;L.,EnF~I,t.)I')ITEP FL
:~s :5 .'/ .5 .~?:I >!::l () () ~~.
it
-
[)
C
(;~ '1,1'[::
HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT
C () i",J, I) 0 (>1 S :::~; i'\! I i",[ C:
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLE(.;:IRV,.I{>ITEF,~ FL,
~5.3 "/" '}' 2: "'7 () .1 ~)
Z~; ::'5 '7 .:;1 ::l :5 l~) ,4 }'
Dr (:\}<,OS" PETEF~ .J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE #102
C t" F~ I~~ r:.11,,") (iT' E: R F: L
:5 ~~; ~? :;1 ,~I :5 l~) 31.
F () R H(~ 'f '0 Ivl (~) F;;~ \", I<T h~ e
500 N osceOLA AVE # 103
C:: L. e () R 1.0.1 (,~[ T E F: F: L.
:5 :;:5 "7.5 !S :~s I:) ::~; 1.
MISCAVIGE. LORETTA A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 104
C:: L [' () R 1,1.,1 (>1 T E F,: FC' L..
~~; :~:; )" .~~I El :5 S:t :5 1.
STRIJEWSKI. HERMANN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 105
C:L~E (~F;:v.!(>[rER ;:::L.
:5 :::~:; ~/ .~~l 5 :::5 '~) ::s .1
BARTON" GEOFFREY J TRE
BARTON" DONNA L TRE
DORSETT. KENDALL L
CHAIT, ISADORE M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 107
C L E I~>[ F~: V,,1 (:[T [-;. R F L.
18880 CARRIGI~R Rl)
S () I"'! () i"'j (>1 C PI
1:) ,~::1 ~~~. ~/' (~~ 6 :2 ~<16t
:5:5 "/' .:) .5 ~5 I) :5 1.
GRAVES, ROBERT M TRE
GRAVES, SHERESE A TRE
:;;::1. :::; () r"1 0 r:.:: I. I:: '( ~.,) ('I "'I"
~) (>1 C: R I~::I f"i E i",! T CI C (>1
(~ j"~ [) R IJ ~;; '0 B F~ 1 (j i'i
(~ I'! [) R I) ~;;:" [) CJ Ii I'! (>1
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 109
C:: L. E (i H 1,,0,,1 PiT E: F: Fe l..
~;~ E51 ~~~ (:;t lj. (S r~~) rS /j.
5 :5 ~7 5 El :~::; 9 ::~:'; .J..
n I Tf<[::I\!" DEHOP(>I i<.
:~>I I T 1<, [(.! I' DPIV I D N
1. 4 ,~3 4 (,DE t.. H (~I F,~T CI j",J
I.' () 1..1 ~;;; T 0 f",!T ><
l/ 0 d ;:::; .~) 6 ,~:l1.
:3 'r (\ H L, "I' (1 'f ..J ('I (,.! I~
MAX-EMANUEL-STR 8
STAPNBERG D d3219
1;1 E r-\ ["I (>1 i',r '{
KENNEDY. WALTRAUT M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 202
C: L. E (~I HI,,") (:: T' C: H F'I...
:5 ::~; '~l .~::I .~:I :5 ~~J :5 ~::l
NIEPENGPiRTEN. WARREN H
NIEHENGPiRTEN" .JPiNICE
500 N OSCEOlPi AVE ~ 203
C L. E (>: F;~ (",,I (:: 'r E P F' L..
:~~:; :~:; "l.~~;1 .:'::1 ~s I) ~5 l~
TlJI3!3ES I f'JCI" \., C)F:~S T
C1ERLACH-TUBBESING. K
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 204
C L. !: (;~ H 1,,1,1 (::::1' C F( F L.
F;;~ 'y' B (~ C f<.., [) n f"! IE:: L..
P 'y' B (>[ C:: i<,,, [) Ct h: I~:::: (:[
270 SCARLETT HD 1312
TOHONTO ON M6N 4X7
c:: ('I r'~ :() D (>1
3 :5 ~l.~5 .~S :5 '~~:I 3; l~.
BURKE" KEVIN.J TRE
C;O MIKHEEV" ANDREI
206 S BRAND BLVD STE 200
G L. E~: f"! [) PI L. E C (~'I
'~:I .1. ::z: () <.:]. 1.51 0
HOCKL. RPiYMOND G
ROCKL., HIlAHIE .J
500 N OSCEOlPi AVE # 207
CL.E:(~pli.,l(:'ITE:R FL.
:?~ :::~; ~7 .~;:;I .~:~I ~:3; 19 ::~S .q.
f:: I SCI.j!...EF~ " 11)(1
FISCHLEH. DAPHNA
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 208
C: L.. E I~:I r::::I,'1I{:1 T E: F~ F'L.
HPiLEVY, BINIAMIN
H PI L. [: \i '{" :~; (~h: (~:
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 209
CL.E:(>IRI.n,I(~ TER f:L.
:5 ;:5 ~l E. 5 ::.:; 19 ~5 E~
~3:5~;/ 5 .~I 39 ::::;;.5
MOHSHEAD. .JOHN W
:;; 0 i"~ D E R i'! () j'-j r,[.. 1./,.11 I I:: I) T i:: I',
MEISOl, MILDRED l
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
CLEARWATER Fl
-
e
W 303
KRECKEl. PATRICK F
KRECKEl. ELINOR M
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~
CLEARWATER FL
304
33755
33755 3935
BEND, JOSEPH P
BEND, AGNES l
500 N OSCEOLA
CLEARWATER FL
TRE
TRE
AVE ~
~)'J.5
REICHARD, GLORIA F
RTE 1 BOX 116A
BARNEY GA
33755 3936
31625 9602
PEREIRA, JOE X
500 N OSCEOLA AVE W 307
CLEARWATER Fl
33755 3936
WHEATON. MARJORIE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 308
CLEARWATER Fl
33'755
CARTER, ROBERT E
CARTER, JUDITH M
1060 CONTINENTALS WAY n 411
BELMONT CA
MC KERNAN, MARY C TRE
MC KERNAN, JAMES J JR
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 310
CLEARWATER Fl
94002 3157
33755 3936
SAWTEllE, GREG F TRE
SAWTEllE. KAREN R TRE
957 VERDUGO CIRCLE DR
GLENDALE CA
91206 1535
KUNHARDT, MARIA D
C;O THE CPA ACCOUNT
365 CR 39A UNIT 16
SOUTHAMPTON NY
11968 5243
ARENA. NANCY
500 N OSCEOLA AVE U 402
CLEARWATER Fl
lEONHARDT. GUNTER
lEONHARDT, MELINDA C
500 N OS AVE n 403
CLEARWATER Fl
33755 3936
337"55 3937
DAVIDSON. ROBERTA L
8474 17TH WAY N
ST PETERSBURG Fl
33702 2857
BURDETTE. HARRY M JR
500 N OSCEOLA AVE U 405
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
GLEASON. FRANK R
GLEASON, SUSANNE W
500 N OSCEOLA AVE U 406
CLEARWATER Fl
SAWTEllE, GREGfRE
SAWTELLE, KAREN TRE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n
CLEARWATER Fl
33755 3937
33755 3942
CUNNINGHAM. SHERR I l
RAMP. LENIN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 408
CLEARWATER FL
f)ERR\(~ F~OGER 8
PERRY. WILMA J
PO BOX L
ALEXANDRIA MN
33755 3937
56308 OO()2
MAINATI, GEORGE A
MAINATI. SARAH A
500 N OSCEOLA AVE n 410
CLEARWATER Fl
CONRADI, ELKE TRUST
MEHLER. HORST TRUST
500 N OS AVE U 411
CLEARWATER FL
33755 3937
337"55 3S'37
DARE. lOUIS
DARE. SUSAN
701 BRAND BLVD 6TH Fl
GI8SI:)N~ R()8ERT W
GIBSON, GENEVIEVE
'~77~ ~i~~,An ~~'~~.,~~~
FEELEY. WILLIAM M
FERREIRA. SHERR I L
931 r"iC:: CIJE (11\/[
S (~I f"'! C 1~111:;,: I~. I] S C (>:
e
-
I:) ~4 () '/ () ~l !:::. :2 .::1
D(':JV I ~:::" i:::D(i..I(~F\~I) A
[) () 'v' IS" PE:GUY .]
1206 1'10i'~(;::\H DR
SOUll.j HEi''-!D I(,!
4 6. l::~:' .1. .:1. ~2~ 1. '7 ~~?
F<:O I,',! E: "' GEOr:'I.GE: F
F< 0 'i',1 E" i"i (:1 F< Ci (:, R E: "I' I"i
5~) N OSCEOLA AVE # 507
CL.EAr<I,I,I(~lrE:F!. FL~
MERWIN. GAlUS WIll
1'1 E F,: 1"',,1 Ii""!" E 1,) G E: [",.! J (>,
75 1"iOlJr',!T T01y'[ RD
r,!E Ir'! f;:~ () C I-I E: L. L... E N 'y'
10805 1216
2~; ~::; 7' .~::l ~~S :5 ~) ?) :~:~
POWLEY" CHARLES N
POWLEY. VIRGINIA .]
500 N OSCEOLA AVE: # 509
C: L. E (~I f,: V',! 10, T E fi: f L.
HE(':I'!" IVI(':JF;:~,JOR I E F
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 510
C: L. E (~ R I,,',j 1~1[ T E F~I 1::7 L..
:5 :57 .::. .5 :5 ~;I ~S .)~~
;5 ~S 7' E) 5,) (S (::;1 :~S ~)
I-I E: (~L. ''!''., 1"1,1 ILL. I (~ i"'1 P
i.1 E (11 L Y" B (~t F;: 13 (~ F::: (>1 ,J
::S.)O E C 1 HCL.E OF;::
r',!E~1,1 L.Er'-!O>< I L
URIZARBARRENA. MIKEL
FF: I (~IS" HERT (>:
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 601
l~~~ () .::::j. .~~t .1. ':)1 7 I~:;' .1.
c:: L~ E (>1 f;;: V') (:: T E F~~ f~ L.
~s :5 "7 5 ~5 :5 ~:;.~ :!::; ,~;,i
BYHNES. LAWRENCE F
[;: 'y' R I".! E ~;;" ,J E ::3 ;:,; I C (>1
t;:, :? ,"1 A F::r ['. L. F:':: D
C:H I CHE:~)TE::h~ (.ifl
i'i I L" L,. r::: h: ,; F:;: F:'~ ET T :;;;
1'1 I L.. L. E h:" ,j J I". L.. H
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 603
C L. F!: (:1 h~ ''''',1 (': T E F,~ F L.
()3:~?5;~~~ 6 4() '7
3 :~; 'i" .5 .:' ::5 '9 :3 'S)
BYRNES. LAWRENCE F
13\(F~:f'!E::3" ,jE': SS I C::,0:
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 604
c:: L. E~ I~~I h: l,i",1 (~, T E: H f L
BYHNES. LAWRENCE
F;: 'y' Hi'! E ::;:" ,J E ::;;; ~:) I C (:,
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 605
C L.. E I~>I i:'~ 1"',,1 () T I:::: F~~ r~ L..
~~; :~:; 7' .!:~; .~:J :S '9 :5 'S:I
,~5:5'lb5 ;59:)~)
,J () i'~ E: S. P E f'''! j.,! "'( (':
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 606
z: (~tJ I',i" 1',1 [:;: L, G (i
BHEITLINU, SANDY
GEISELGASTEIG STR 30
:3()0() i'iLJr.jCi-IEi.! 90
OE F;;: i"j lelf"! "t"
C L. E (~ H /,".) 1'~'lr E Fo~ I~:; L,
:5 :;~;; '7 51 .:::, :5 ~;~ :s ,:~)
ERIKSEN. VIVIAN S
ERIKSEN, ROCHELLE: K
PO 130>< :;347
I"'j C:I",! T E:: \i J ::3 T (:1 CO
dL14ij 08,47
HHABELSKI" DOROTHY
50() N OS:CEOl,~A A~/E ~ 6()')
C:: L_ E ('II;~ V.,II~~ T E R i;-': L..
:~5 () ..--/ .~:s 51 :5 I::) ~::l ()
Gh:OPE 'J 1"1 I C:H{':JEL. ,J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 610
CL.r~I~~RI,,"J(~ 'rr:::F: FL
:~::; :?:; "7 E) '::1 ~s t:;,1 .(~ ()
NEUWIRTH. ROBERl E
2153 ELKHUHST DR
PL (~r'~ or ><
)' .!SJ () :,'?: :5 .1 t~ 1. :2
EC:I<':3TE':IN01 I..JDCI
i< R CI (::H~:; T R E E T:Sf;!:
52445 TIT?:
Ci E: f~ r'j{~r'.! 'I(
L.[l~~::;L.E '{" L, I I'!D(:,
51::,2 PF~(:IF;; I E F)SE
DI:;}<'OT(~ DUr~E.;~~; ~;C1
.5 '7 0 ~::J. ()
:3i~:::TTLE" l3F;UC;E .]
SETTLE. ELIZABETH .]
500 N OSCEOLA AVE W 704
OSTERTAG. MARTIN
500 N OSCEOLA AVE W 705
I~' I r:- "j r:.' I" I ,~', T I:::' 0 1:::'1
--
e
13 I;;: CII,!"I i\!" lvi (~ >< I i\! [ S
500 N OSCEOLA AVE ~ 708
CLE::(ih:V,)(i TF:: r~ F~L.
WADDELL, DAVID F::
1,r\.1 (::1 [) {) E:. L. L. ~ G l.\l r:: r~~ ~:;
500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 709
CL[:('"lF:::I"I,I(:\ TE:H I"" L.
::) :::~;; '7 ES !:~ :5 (~1 ~1. J..
:5 :~~; ~/ E) .:;1 :~) ~) /~. 1.
f<' I r..j G" ["'i 1 C I-I (..) E: L
i<. 1 I""! Ci., T I ivi or II Y .J
500 N OSCEOLA AVE
C L. C 101 F~ 1,.\) (~I T [~ h: FL.
H; 7'.1 C)
MESCHOULAM. SAMUEL
FI..JE:i"!TE I)E C(:ISTHO
PALMA CHIOLLA # 4
BOSQUES DE PALMAS
r1CX I CO
501
:..11...1 I >::: (::, I
:5 :~) --/ .~~; .:::::. 2~; '~;) (4 .1.
HO[HH I G" C(lHI... I,..,,!
C/O ROEHRIG. SABINE TRC
500 OSCEOl_A A~IE # 802
CL.E:(~lh:li,,1ATE:R FI...
.](l(iES '.' l'III..rOi\! C
,J (I /,.[ I:: ;::;:., R CI ::; [
500 N IJS AVE ~ 803
:S 2S 7" E~ .~l ::s I:;~ l4. ~;2~
C L. E (:\ r:,: 1,.\1 (:1 T [: R F t,
~5::S'~l.5E, ~5~) 4::2
PE:F,:E I R(i., ><()SE
500 N OSCEOLA AVE U 804
C L, E (i 1:;1,1,.",1 I~ T E h: r:: L..
KREINER, JOEL THE
FISHER. JAMES Q THE
1801 CENTUHY PARK f STE 240
LC)S Plf',ICjELES; C::Pr
~::; 3; ~l.~:::1 .5 :~) ~J) f.~} :.2
9 0 () (::, '~l ~? :5 ~? 61
V,)ONG" P('ITHI: Cf<. \(
V"I () t.,! Cl., L, I r',! D I~~I
1.0 ~':~;C)IJTHDOI,i,,1i'.! CT
H I L..L.:3eor;~C)UeiH C(::
94().lCr 12':12
V,,1 J L... L... i'..1 E r:.: " j,j F:: I L (i
11\,1IL.L.Hr:::H" [\i[ :<.
19~?S PJi"ICPES:T DH
CLEI"!Ot::LC Ct:1
(;;, 12 () 71 () ':1':::)
CULLODEN" CHAHLES Pr
CULLODEH. SALLY B
2: () () () B [ L. I'~I J h: [:: () r;::
CiLEr"!D{:~LE: Ct~
9.1:?()1 1.1~ll
i"', t~ I) [f:':~ C) '. i.i t~ ::,~ I ('I (;(
IDJ(~I i'l
500 N A AVE~ tt 809
CL.EP:HI"\)(:ITEH F:'L..
::~:; 2,') '}' s .:s ~5 s~ .15
cor(~I, .JEFFEi:;;:'y' D
COTA. PPrTRICIPr L
5410 r-/t\F!.IJCr;: C:T
S (:1 C h: (:1('1 E: r',! 'f () C It)
BOLGEH. [LEAHOR H
500 N OSCEOLPr AVE # 811
c: L,.I:~ ('II::'~ I,iJ PI T E P F L...
9 .~) ;~~; ~? :'L :?:'; 7'1. ),.
:;~; ~5 ~/ .5 .~::::! :5~) J.. .:';1
JEHSEN, CRAIG r TRE
JENSEN" SALLY R TRE
4245 MESA VISTA OH
L. PI C (:1 i",.j (~I [) (:1 C: (:)
000 ::;; ()
HOPP. DAGMAH TRE
SLANKERTZ. ROLF TRE
C/O ROLAND HEPrLTY
41 N FORT HPrRRISON PrVC
CL.Etih:V')(iT[F:~ F:I.. 33755 - L..{ 01 ~
\,1 J t\ j'~ i',.j (;1 ,. f"1 I::::) N I...) E L... I:::
\i I (~11',! f",,! PI" :<. PIT I PI F
52 CL:rI~TOH ST
B [ L.1"'/ () j',,! T f'l (:1
LOEHWING. Huor C
LOEHWING. CLAIRE
500 N OSCEOL.A AVE # D
C:: t, E PI F;~ (,\,1 PIT [:; r;~ Fl..
() ~2 ~~l '7 t~ :s ~5 e~ ~5
3:5 '? S .:;1 ~:;'9:::;2
NCUMAN. DOUGLASS A
NCUMAN, HESCCCA R
4240 HIGHWAY 99 S
():SHLPll".ID or:::
E:~ r~:1 \.,.' [: PI i<," r"l J C:
4515 OCCAN VIEW BLVD # 305
L... ('; C (1 (,~ :::1 D (c: C 10:
()00:50
'9 )" ~?:l ~2 () ':;~ () ,(I- (;,
T I I.. I.. E:3 " RC)r',!
T I L. L.. E ~:;. :<. I i"1
MORSE. DAVID G TRE
e
41
IMMERSITE NETWORK INC
504 N FORT HARRISON AVE
C'_EI0IF~(I')()TE:F!. Flo.
HAF!.RIS. STEPHEN W
HARRIS, SHERRY R
1949 N CATALINA ST
L()~:; (:,[-.,J,CiELES C(~,
~S:5 7' .:;, ~I ;~) S:' r.) .::'
() () () ~? 7' 1. r~:~ () :5
H E: F;~ L F:" F~ 0 t',,! (i L.I)
BEF,:LC" PEC;;C;Y (:,
1 ~s 1 L.I:: I"::' 1,01,1 () I;:: D 1 3
C L. E: ,~:) R (1.,1 (:, ~r E R F; L..
(>] \/ E::
:5 :5 ~1 61 ~l :2 ::5 () tl.
(:,\/[;:
c; (;j t,,! I:; [: 1_.11 0 I::: r: ." );JA;V I D J
"1' co, ". . O''''''t'~. I ~f":' FYI ", ')..-]
:~, ,.I::: ..~' .,'~ ::: ;) '. .... n ". ".., ~:~ I,., I ,
I,.... L.. L. H '. i')~' I .::. 1\ / " L,
:5 ?; '/' ~~~I ..~:. \~:; '~~:l ..:.. t~i'
:~~I \i r::
SALINAS. MAF!.Y TRE
CHURCH SCIE:NTOLOGY RELIGIOUS
~)():S (;L.[\/EL_(~N[) S T
C L. E: p, h: 1,,") (:, T E Fi: F: L.
CHUF!.CCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
BOARD OF TRUSTE:E:S
319 S GARI)Et~ AVE
::5 :!~; ~l ~::l E~ (:l () () 7
C; L E (:, F: 1,.1,1 p, T E F,~ I:;' L..
3 :5 '}' .~~l (~ .5 ~~:l :2: ~S
GULFVIEW Fi:ESTAURANT INC
.J.Oi) COF:()N(:,[)O [)F,:
C:L.E(~Rll.,IATER FL
r"'j 1~:1 F\ T (I N" c: (\ F~ I S (':
1 :52 5 P:P:::bCIF:: (>: \i[
L.0:3 (\L.T03 C(i
2::; ?; '761 ~l :2 ~4 () t.~l
,::;, ,~l () 2.' ~l .:.) :::) ~s :2
MARKOPOULOS. ANTONIOS
1.()0 C:OG:O[-,!(:,OO OF;:
CL..[ (ir;~V,!(~: T F:R Fer..
::5 :::; '7 I~S >'/ :? ~:~l () ,::~
ZEI,)3 I I~I"'.! I liC
lOr) CDf-~:Oi,,~t:II)O [IF~
CL[()RV~I:~I TEFo~ F~L..
:~5 ~) '}' IS, }' ::? o::~l () (.::j,
ANTONIS. MARK INN INC
.11)0 C:OF:Or"'!I~~[)O [)F;;:
CI._EAr;~hl:~:) TE~:r;~ FL
CITIZENS COMMI33ION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS OF CLEARWATER
305 N FORT HARRI30N AVE
C L.. E PI R 1.,\,1 (:, T E F:; f: L.
:~:; :5 '/ (I )' :? ~:~. () ~:~1-
:5 :~:; 'l.~S Y;I :5 l~~l :2 .~:s
(>; \/ E~:
:3 ,~~:; }' .~S (~:I .5 4 ~? ::S
RD PD
01(172 1611
HROWN. ARNOLD PROP
ATTN: ROGER WOODRUFF
121 N OSCEOLA AVE
C L. F: {;:J R hi PI T E::: F~ F::' L.
CLEARWATER. CITY OF
C/O ARNDLD-bROWN PROP
ATTN~COLLIERS ARNOLD REAL [S
"i ....> '-j :'" I ,.."~ c', \...~. 1""" ~..." I f.
e
-
20) Need to eliminate three parking spaces near the retaining wall to save trees (live oaks -18,18,24 inches) show
PlUOR TO DO
21) Relocate water line away from the trees as well PRIOR TO DO
22) Need retention pond redesigned - maintain ex elevations under the trees (cannot survive three-foot cut as
shown) - perhaps pick up volume to the east of the building REVISE PLAN AND SHOW PRIOR TO DO-
THIS WILL BE BASED ON CALCULATIONS THAT ARE NEEDED TO BE SUBMITTED - MAY NEED
TO MAKE CHANGES IN THE FIELD AFTER STAKING
23) Need to see ALL trees - even those to be removed - on the site plan (proposed site plan) PRIOR TO DO - NO
LONGER A VALID COMMENTS
24) Need percolation calculations or underdrainage system PRIOR TO DO
25) Tif$21,363 less credit PRIOR TO CERT OF OCCUPANCY
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2:15 p.m.
Case: FL 01-06-25 - 302 North Osceola Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Osceola Bay Development, LLC.
Representative: Joanne Fuchs.
Location: 1.07 acres located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, approximately 200 feet
north of Jones Street.
Atlas Page: 277B
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to increase the required height of an attached dwelling
from 50 feet to 150 feet, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project.
Proposed Use: A 25-unit condominium development.
Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner.
Attendees included: Jeff Cobble (Harvard Jolly), Todd Fuchs, Ryan Ellenberg, Jim Klees (Harvard Jolly), Taes
Lamb (with owner), Joann Fuchs, Ken Rausch (Northside Engineering)
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1) Need fire to address access to building; need to revise plan to accommodate fire truck (need to meet load rating
requirements - truck is 20 feet pad to pad - ken rousch suggested using adjacent property to the south for
access if they could secure an agreement- going into the parking structure is not an option; need 75,000 pound
driveway - no greater than 10 percent slope of the driveway; no greater than 150 feet in driveway length;
2) One fire hydrant within 40 feet of 1 :DC (department connection) and an additional fire hydrant for F .F.
purposes (water supply)
3) Fire - Require a 26 foot fire lane access per the code - entrance way may need to be reworked to accommodate
fire and solid waste access without decreasing landscape requirements - entrance area must have a radius of at
least 45 feet; A maximum of 150-feet for backing up is allowed per code. After that, a turn around is required.
(A copy of the code was given to applicant and to Lisa Fierce at the meeting.)
4) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facilities will need to be addressed on this proposed 25-unit
condo development prior to issuance of building permits, More information is needed on the existing structures
on the property;
5) If doing garages in the parking garage - need to fully sprinkle - need to show on plan;
6) Public Works - discharging directly to the estuary so we need treatment - pond extends over setback line -
need to verify location of the h'eatment pond
7) Attenuating stormwater treatment and there are not downstream impacts (doing % " across the entire site for
treatment); this meets city standards - need to show percolation rates
8) Parking must be per city standards need 19 foot stalls not 18 foot
9) Need 43 feet not 35 feet at the circle for 24 foot aisle and 19 foot stall
10) TIF $953 per unit - can get credit for existing units PRIOR TO CERT OF OCCUP.
11) How to service solid waste - need to have a dumpster - need to have access for vehicle and there are slope
constraints - no black balTels for multifamily use/commercial use; are they doing compactor service? Using
shoots into a dumpster on wheels-no compactor - prefer to have it put at the curb - cannot back up more than
100 feet; need to show shoot location on plan
12) Where is the elevator? Need to show on revised plans
13) Applicant needs to contact Jeff McKinney, Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood association (phone 443-3227,
fax 442-3738); also Anne DePoole of Belvedere apts -phone 447-4711, fax 442-1226)
DRC Action Agenda - July 12, 2001 - page 6
e
-
14) Need revised site location maps
15) t-.reed fencel'yvall details and specs - sho\v view triangles on al1-~regarding gate - 20 foot \vidth clearance knox
gate - key system - need access for solid waste as well
16) Need more landscaping on the north side of the site -look at buffer on the south side of the site
17) Need landscape easement for landscaping in the right of way -or right of way permit
18) Need revised landscape plan - need to pave the island
19) Need perspective elevation - the computer-generated submittal does not convey the entire design
20) Staff needs to evaluate this application against the periphery plan policies
21) Need new criteria
22) Why does zoning atlas show vacation 11011-1867 along Osceola Avenue - teclmically not vacated because has
not met all conditions
23) Trees trying to preserve are of average quality and wont tolerate grade change - need not preserve - need to pay
tree replacement fee PRIOR TO CO
24) Need to revised site plan and survey and to better show all property lines - all sheets
25) Need separate permit(s) for construction of docks - cormnercial docks are reviewed as level two apps through
the cdb; - joann says not doing this now
26) Will need to do a condo plat at the time of certificate of occupancy
27) Need 15 sets of all revised plans and application including signed/sealed survey by Monday, July 23, 2001 for
review by the CDB at its August 21 meeting.
28) Will fax these comments to ken rousch and todd fuchs on Monday.
3:00 p.m.
Case: FL 01-06-23 - 211 Dolphin Point
Owner/Applicant: Houle Industries, Inc.
Representative: Mr. Robert Pergolizzi/ Florida Design Consultants.
Location: 0.37 acres located on the south side of Dolphin Point, approximately 550 feet west of
Larboard Way.
Atlas Page: 267B.
Zoning:_MHDR, Medium High Density Residential District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce the minimum lot width from 150 feet to 125
feet, reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 4 feet, reduce the rear (south) setback from 15
feet to 0 feet and to increase the height from 30 feet to 50 feet as part of a Residential Infill
Project, and an extended dock.
Proposed Use: A nine-unit condominium building (39 feet in height proposed).
Presenter: Mark T. ParTY, Planner.
Attendees included: Roger Larson, Patricia Castelono, Tom Home (Marine Advisory Cormnittee), Robert
Pergolizzi, Ed Mazur, Steve Spencer, Lisa Fierce, Mark Pany, Elliot Shoberg, Paul Bertels, Tom
Glenn, Don Melone
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1) Site plan indicates this property is vacant and therefore Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facilities
will need to be addressed on the proposed 9 unit condo development prior to issuance of building permits; _
responded to Art Kader on July 9th
2) Pond size and drainage cales for 0.75" stormwater treatment; and need to clarify location - prior to review by
cdb; Elliot checked with his supervisor and we will accept 0.50"
3) Revise elevation starting from base flood elevation.
4) Show site visibility triangle along the water
5) Need cales on fire load vs. available water supply - A minimum of a standpipe system is required (wet system);
applicant's architect stated that the building will be sprinklered
6) Tif $953 per unit
7) Who will roll out the dumpsters? How many? What type of enclosure? (need to match the style and materials
of the building) - perhaps reorient the dumpster - built to city specs - need to make accessible without rolling it
out; will relocate the dumpster and handicapped parking space
8) No land resource comments
9) Need a condo plat at time of cert of occupancy
10) Need to make sure all plant material meets code -live oaks need to be at 4 inch not 2 inch caliper
DRC Action Agenda - July 12,2001 - page 7
~
--
-
e
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S MYRTLE AVE.
POBOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748
OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567
FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576
TO:
Joanne I,-uch~_,
FAX#:
469.8800
-........--..-..,....................
FROM:
Mark T. Parry, Planning and Development Services, City of Clearwater
DATE:
MQE~t9:y,J u 1y_ 16,) OQl
MESSAGE:
Comments from 7/12/01 DRC
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1) Need fire to address access to building; need to revise plan to accommodate fire truck (need to meet
load rating requirements
2) One fire hydrant within 40 feet of 1 :DC (department connection) and an additional fire hydrant for
F.F. purposes (water supply)
3) Fire - require more than 20-feet for vehicular access and at least four feet for walking access for a
total of 24 feet for fire access, entrance way may need to be reworked to accommodate fire and solid
waste access without decreasing landscape requirements; The issue is that during a fire, the structure
may become unstable and threaten the fire truck and fire fighters. In this scenario, backing a truck up
150 feet or more may be impossible.
4) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facilities will need to be addressed on this proposed
25-unit condo development prior to issuance of building permits. More information is needed on the
existing structures on the property;
5) Public Works - discharging directly to the estuary so we need treatment - pond extends over setback
line - need to verify location of the treatment pond
6) Attenuating stormwater treatment and there are not downstream impacts (doing % " across the entire
site for treatment); this meets city standards
7) Parking must be per city standards need 19 foot stalls not 18 foot
8) Need 43 feet not 35 feet at the circle for 24 foot aisle and 19 foot stall
9) TIP 953 per unit - can get credit for existing units
10) How to service solid waste - need to have a dumpster - need to have access for vehicle and there are
slope constraints - no black barrels
11) Where is the elevator?
12) compactor service?
13) Applicant needs to contact Jeff McKinney, Old Clearwater Bay neighborhood association (phone
443-3227, fax 442-3738); also Anne DePoole ofBelvedierre apts. - phone 447-4711, fax 442-1226)
e It
'14) l~eed revised site location map:-,-
15) Need wall details and specs
16) Need more landscaping on the north side ofthe site
17) Need landscape easement for landscaping in the right of way
18) Need revised landscape plan - need to pave the island
19) Need to accommodate turnaround
20) Need perspective elevation - the computer-generated submittal does not convey the entire design
21) Staff needs to evaluate this application against the periphery plan policies
22) Need new criteria
23) Need 15 sets of all revised plans and application including signed/sealed survey by Monday, June 18,
2001 for review by the CDB at its July 17 meeting.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558.
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Two (2)
L_
~--
.
e
~ i $ r ".f ,.
.~;"~ :-. ; ,',,' :";
\j~" _..,f'_.L"',';;';~'-
,~~'I, ,,~,"'. ". f-_
'-.......... --~; ....K#'J_, V ~
,::..j"~.~~.~";FG;;.-::~~
, d~. . -.,' Q"
-",,~ :. -'~r----)
::.~ . ,,"\'.-":,<:"',\
:'~/:~~s'AS;~';"\'
C I T Y 0 F
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33758-4748
MU;-.iIClPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVEC;UE, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33756
TELEPHO>IE (727) 562-4800 F-\.x (727) 562-4825
PARKS AND RECREATIO;-.i
DEPARDIE:\T
June 29,2001
Mr. Rich Trela
601 Cleveland St., Suite 240
Clearwater, FL 33755
Re: Osceola Bay Condominiums, 302-308 Osceola Avenue
. ,
Dear Mr. Trela:
According to the current Recreation and Open Space Land Dedication Ordinance, the above
referenced proj ect will be required to satisfy the Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation
Facilities dedication requirement prior to issuance of any building pern1its.
In order to determine the amount owed, the developer or representative should complete the top
portion of the attached form and return it to the City of Clearwater Parks and Recreation
Department with verification of the just value for the land only according to the current year's
property tax assessment.
Please note, this dedication requirement could be a substantial amount and an impact to your
project. Therefore, we encourage you to contact Debbie Richter at 562-4817 as soon as possible
to estimate the assessment and to answer any questions.
Sin5,~rely,
{lLt k::J~
Art Kader
Assistant Director/Planning, Projects & Parks Group
Attachment: Open Space/Recreation Impact Worksheet
cc: Debbie Richter, Administrative Analyst, Parks & Recreation
Lisa Fierce, Project Manager, Planning & Development Services
Robert Hays, Development Services Coordinator
r" ~" r'" f"- rU7 '. ,
~,. ;, ~ !~ r: r';;~'
, fib""" ll. ';j t.d L
(G 0 I-Db -l5
BRIA,,). AC;\GST, MAYOR-CO~i~IISSIO;\ER
WHITC:EY GRAY, Cml~IISSIOi\ER HOlT H.'\.\1ILTO,;, Cm\~llSSIO';ER
ED H.'J\T, COM'lISSI0NER * BILL)O\SO\, Cml!-llsSIO;\ER
"EQUAL E:-'jPLOY\lEST ASD AFFIRMATIVE ACTIO;, E\lPLOYER"
AS.SMENT~F OPEN SP ACEIRECREATIO.VIP ACT
(Expansion of Existing Residential Developments by8 Units or More)
~.Clearwater
-~
u~
Parks and Recreation
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE DEVELOPER:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME:
ADDRESS:
# OF EXISTING UNITS:
ZONING DISTRICT:
# OF ALLOWABLE UNITS ON SITE:
# OF UNITS TO BE ADDED:
PARCEL GROSS LAND AREA:
PARCEL NET LAND AREA:
LAND AREA APPLICABLE TO EXPANSION (% proposed to allowable X net land area):
JUST VALUE OF LAr..'I) ONLY ACCORDING TO CURRENT YEAR'S PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT:
$ (VERIFICATION REQUIRED)
VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT: $ (JUST VALUE ~ BY GROSS LAND AREA)
I A TrEST THAT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ABOVE IS CORRECT, COMPLETE AND TRUE.
PROPERTY OWNER/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE
DATE
NOTE: All fees payable to the "City of Clearwater". Open Space and Recreation Facilitv Land fees should be submitted to Parks and
Recreation, Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Recreation Facilitv fees should be submitted to Planning
and Development Services at the same address.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
I. OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT
# of Units to be Added
# of Allowable Units On Site
% (Proposed to Allowable)
Total Site Net Land Area
Land Area Subject to Assessment
Open Space Factor
Open Space Assessment
x
SF
SF
x.040
SF
II. RECREA TION FACILITY LAND ASSESSMENT
# of Units to be Added
Recreation Facility Land Factor
Recreation Facility Land Assessment
(Not to exceed 6% of parcel net land
area if private facilities provided)
x 150
SF
SF
III. RECREA TION FACILITY ASSESSMENT
# of Units to be Added
Recreation Facility Factor
Recreation Facility Assessment
x $200
$
RECOMMENDA nONS
LAND
VALUE
DOLLARS
PAYMENT DUE
I. Open Space Fee .......................
SFX
SF =$
Plats: Prior to Approval &
Signature of Final or Record Plat
Projects: Prior to Building Permit
Same as above
II. Recreation Facility Land Fee...
SFX
SF = $
III. Recreation Facility Fee ....................................................................... = $
Building Permit
TOTAL ............................................................. .................................. = $
P ARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
DATE
s:\Parks\Forms\1800-0310A Impact Fee Form #I-Revised 5/1 % I-Completed form to be reramed in Parks and RecreatIon Admmistrative Office as a
permanent record according to City and State Records Management guidelines.
e
e/
~
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 S MYRTLE AVE.
POBOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748
OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567
FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576
..
TO:
Jghn\}gEl:1.~ll0;M~t.rj'0~'. .
FAX#:
409,B8QQ
FROM:
Mark T. Parry, Planning and Development Services, City of Clearwater
DATE:
Ihm:~(J~Y,J!:!ne 2JL?QQ1
MESSAGE:
JoAnne,
I need you to address the comprehensive infill criteria (below). I was thinking, last week, that
you would be able to come in a Flexible Development just for a height increase but you don't
meet one of the criteria - dealing with location. In order to get the height the site must be, among
other things, north south of Drew Street. Your site is not. That leaves the only option coming in
a comp infill. This does nothing to your schedule, as the process is the same as it was. It only
means that you need to fully address the following criteria. If I could get these back by early next
week it would help me out tremendously.
C. Comprehensive infill redevelopment projects.
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties;
3. The uses within the comprehensive in fill redevelopment project are
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater;
.
.
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
HOUSING DMSION
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORlDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERvlCES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
June 26,2001
Mr. Richard Trela
Osceola Bay Development, LLC
601 Cleveland Street, Suite 240
Clearwater, FL 33755
~",',,~ I"C','; ",,' '-',".'
fi~~~" !c' ~~ t~ ~ .."'
RE: Application for Flexible Standard development (FL~M~l5'J"request to increase
the permitted height from 50 feet to 150 feet f~ Mtach:;J' dwellings in the
Downtown District.
Dear Mr. Trela:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to increase the permitted height from 50
feet to 150 feet for attached dwellings in the Downtown District at 302 North Osceola
Avenue and determined that the application is complete.
The application will be reviewed for sufficiency by the Development Review Committee
(DRC) on July 12, 2001 in the Planning Department conference room _ Room 216 _ on
the second floor of the Municipal Service Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in
Clearwater. Please call Sandy Harriger at 562.4582 no earlier than one-week prior to the
meeting date for your review time.
You or your client needs to be present to answer any questions that the committee may
have regarding your application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 562-4558.
Sincerel)f yours,
Mark T. Parry
Plmmer
S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending Applications\Osceola North 302 Osceola Bay Club\Osceola North 302 complete.doc
BI\[:\i\ J .\1!i\CS1', iv!:lYO[{-Cml\lISS[Ot\EF
Ell ]-[:\1\'1', VICE i\'LiYol\-Cml:\IISSIOI\EI{ WI-IITI\EY GKIY, Cml\[[SS[Oi\ER
HOtT ]-[:\,\111.'1'01\, Cml:\IISSIONER (i) BILI.JOi\SO>~, CO\I.IIISSIO?\EI{
"EQIJAL E,\lI'LOYMEi\T AND ArFIRMATIVE ACTION E~lPLOYER"
------------------------------------~--------------------
.
Section 119.01 (1), Florida Statutes, provides that aft stat., county, and m~lclpat records
shan at an Urnes be ~pen for a personal inspection by any person.
Section 119.07, Florida Statutes, provld~ that every person having custody of pubrlc records
ahaD permlt them to be Inspected and examrned at reasonable times and under hJsJ1ler
supervlsron by any person, and he shall furnlsh copres thereof on payments of fees as
prescribed by taw. " further provides that pubnc records which are deemed by law to be
confidential or which are prohibited 'rom befng inspected by the pubrlc shaD be exempt from
the provisions of this section.
---------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Chapter 119. Aorlda Statuea, I hereby request to Inspect the followfng
publ1c record(I): (()y... .. . \ _ p . r===: I
---Q.~-~~-s-_~-~L~-~----- L-- -. e...- (
--~~C::--3.9_~___2.~~l5::~
-----------------------------------
----------..-----------------
Print Name
__r_______._________________
SJgncltur.
----~---------------------
O&te 01 ~
Do not write below thll line fO( department use only.
-----------------------------------------------------
Inspected under supervlsJon ot.
--~1-hc6_~if
---~~--~~~-f-,
TItI.
Note copies 01 pubUc reooros made
6 ~ -~\ _ 1/
---_11__~__t!__~___ - \ II @ .~.s--"!:- Ib..lob
--__!.~~_~-~1~-f l"", 'i:.:;. 1'1 e 3 po ;,':\ 1.%
-"'
------------------------
00
Employee
Human Resources FIe
)bk\ C:t>-\-
Rev[S&d 2198
H~f'J. ~ s-:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 EI;X (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
May 26, 2004
Jessica Hollingsworth
Triangle Development Company LLC
411 Cleveland St., Suite 210
Clearwater, FL 33755
Dear Ms. Hollingsworth:
This letter is to confirm that the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the
Downtown (D) zoning district govern property located at 302-308 Osceola Avenue.
Design review and site plan review are required for any development proposal for this
property.
The property is located in the Old Bay character district established by the Downtown
Plan. Residential uses are allowed in this location at a density of25 units per acre. If the
property exceeds two acres in area, however, a density of 50 units per acre is permitted.
Please be aware that submerged land cannot be included in density calculations. The
maximum allowable building height in this portion of the Old Bay district is 150 feet.
Any request for height in excess of 50 feet requires a public hearing before the
Community Development Board.
The Downtown Plan established a Public Amenities Incentive Pool whereby developers
can request an allocation of additional development potential through a site plan
application submitted to the Community Development Board (CDB). Additional density
may be allocated by the CDB if the developer provides one or more amenities identified
in the Plan to assist the City in achieving its redevelopment goals. Eligible amenities
include, but are not limited to, on-site public art or a contribution to Coachman Park,
Station Square Park, the Pinellas Trail or the Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan.
The Downtown Plan also allows the CDB to consider an increase in building height in
conjunction with an application utilizing the Pool provided the increase does not exceed
20% of the maximum pennitted height or a minimum of ten feet and if the developer
provides a major amenity. Based on the maximum permitted height for this property
(150 feet), the Board could potentially consider an increase of 30 feet if a major amenity
is provided.
BRlA1'i]. AUNGST, !V1AYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII.I.]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION E",1PLOYER"
If you need any additional information, please contact me at your convenience at 562-
4587.
Sincerely yours,
~I ., /
/'I {! d I (:/L/i\,(_ .-/
(,_.xC VJ-Q L' I -._--
Gina L. Clayton "
Long Range Planning Manager
S:\Planning Department\Letters\Zoning Letters\302-308 Osceola Avenue (D).doc
2
FI LfR
Osceola Bay Club
Public Works Staff Report
Enqineerinq Analysis:
Sanitary Sewer:
Sewer service is available at the site. There is sufficient capacity at
the Marshal Street treatment plant.
Potable Water:
Water service is available at the site. The City system has
sufficient capacity.
Stormwater:
Stormwater treatment is provided per City code.
Traffic:
The original plan proposed vacation of the entire Osceola Avenue
right-of-way and closure of the one-way northbound street. City
staff conducted traffic counts over a one-week period showing an
average volume of 700 vehicles per day. Northbound Ft. Harrison
at Drew Street is operating at level of service "F" in the evening
peak hours. Staff determined that diversion of an additional 700
vehicles per day to Ft. Harrison was not recommended. The site
plan has now been revised to leave Osceola Avenue open as a one
lane northbound road. This revision is acceptable to City Staff.
Ingress/Egress:
Egress from the parking garage onto Georgia Street is preferable to
egress onto Osceola Avenue, as Georgia Street will have 20' of
pavement. Also, a sidewalk is to be provided on Georgia Street for
pedestrian access to Clearwater Harbor.
Summary/Reco mm endati ons:
Public Works recommends approval of the site plan subject to the following conditions:
1. Separate permit(s) are required for construction of docks or other structures in
Clearwater Harbor.
2. A revised right-of-way vacation application with updated letters of no objection from
all utilities is required.
3. A condition of the partial vacation of Osceola Avenue is that an ingress/egress
easement be provided to the property at 300 N. Osceola Avenue.
4. Existing utilities must be rerouted from underneath the proposed tennis courts to
within the new Osceola Avenue right-of-way.
5. Parking and access aisle dimensions must meet City standards, including clear
distance between columns in parking garage.
~ i(VI3!6D
~"f1
~....
lit .
City of Clearwater
Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet
TO: Lisa Fierce, Planning Manager
FROM: Michael D. Quillen, City Engineer
COPIES:
Mke Gust, Traffic Operations Engineer
Don Melone, Engineer I
Kelly O'Brien, Engineer I
DATE:
April 28, 2000
(iv 6 T '{ G.Jf ,,Jti:Il-
..ft....A"ft ........ ~ [)6t/,erJ
~. ;1l-A-~~ K
ApI\1UJ' So ~
0,"- fuJ A
.
SUBJECT:
Osceola Bay Club
The following is a summary of Engineering comments for the subject development:
1. A separate dock permit will be required for construction of such structures within
Clearwater Bay
2. By code definition, Osceola Avenue functions as a collector street, thus an
appropriate right-of-way width of 80 ft. A continuation ofthe existing 40 ft. width is
acceptable, but not the reduction to 30-33 ft as proposed. This will allow installation
of sidewalks on both sides of the street and lessen the alignment curvature. The
appropriate right-of-way dedication will be needed.
3. A new vacation of right-of-way application will have to be submitted and letters of no
objection obtained from all affected utilities.
4. A letter of no objection will be needed from 300 N. Osceola Avenue for vacation of
the portion fronting their property.
5. An ingress/egress agreement with 300 N. Osceola Avenue will be needed.
6. The proposed utility easement across tennis courts is unacceptable. Existing and
proposed utilities should to be relocated/located within the proposed right-of-way at
the property owner's expense.
7. Easement or relocation of existing fire hydrant on Jones Street will be required.
8. Proposed apron for roll-out dumpster at SW comer of Georgia & Osceola will need
Solid Waste review/approval by Jim Maglio.
"~9. Hcp parking to meet City, State, and ADA standards
f "\0. Parking and access aisle dimensions must meet City standards (clear distance
between columns in the garage)
11. Clarification of owner responsibility for any private storm lines will be needed.
12. Vehicle trip generation will not have any significant impact on affected intersections
or roadways, with no reduction in level of service (LOS) on any roads. This includes
Ft. Harrison Avenue, as it is already operating at LOS F. Site impact does not
wanant any roadway segment widening or spot impluvements for turn lanes, if the
security gate functions efficiently.