FLS2003-07035
.
.
CruAUS
'5~~ 6lwdOVVLcJ. (+.
CAe.'d..wl)l....~ r pt-.. '1315'6""
~ 1tJ~ /".1 d;;- ~(~:
fI~ ACc-~ JI.;'s I~ ..A
0\. ~~ Iv' ~ tlr~ ~
elfl /J.~!rr it! '3 (roW\- klt'V'- sf.
cle~.J'w~,
S;'vu
~ ~w,\J~\'Il~
~&N'tl~ 'liR~~~ 5.CO
;1/,7 ef .A. CO( ~A /II A e ( r a
/ -" 7- &7'
.
.
o J~~I~-:I2003 rn ~
f'L.Aa'4NI & _VELOPMENT SVCti
CITY OF CtEARWATER
FLS2003-07035
703 FRANKLIN ST
Date Received: 7/18/2003
CASTANHEIRO.. NIGEL
ZONING DISTRICT: D
LAND USE: CBD
ATLAS PAGE: 286B
PA)D
~lENO. ~,*lfJ, ~
I
CL WCoverSheet
~ :::E "c:l . e-
o "; 0 = =
0 ~ ~ = = .J
N 0'\ Q., iii iii .S-
-- V) ... V) "
t"- r-- r-- <.l
00 = ~
...... \0 = ""'" ""'" ...,.
-- ";I: = ~ ~ <.l
t"- S
~
-<
-;; -;
... ....
= "c:l =
Eo- ~ E-l
S "~
~ r:: ....
~ ... =
... ~ 0 e
.... ell
~ ....
~ = ~ Q) ~ c:
~ = ~ = 0
= = r:: ~ :;::;
~ ...... .~
N 0.
~ \0
N 0.
~ ...... CO
""'" Q)
= ~
~ I :6
t 0
...... '5
!:Ii: 0
Q)
= E
z 0
s .U
tf') - -
J. .- :J
M r.:: E 0
= = ....
= Q) Q)
t'-- u 0.:6
= CO 0
= ....-
= QIIl
= . CO
= l'f"l = 1-c:'O
= Q Z ~ .Q Q)
Q ... O:::Cijt;:
= =
= t:! = t"- WU:P
= D..=O
= QO ... N <C 0. c: '-
= ..... ... ""'" 0
........ -< N I-g-~
tf') r-- Q)
= Q Oc:- ~
= .. zco=
~ (1)....3: ~
M .... -.E:J
1"'"1 =
~ = (1)_0
.. 0; Z -0.>-
=Ii: .:l: ::I: .- '0
'u = I-Q)c:
~ .... = U CO
C. ~ = ~'O
.....
QJ CO Q)
(J 0 .!Q ~
QJ = U
~ = 1Il'-
a i! .- >
"C CIl ~~
... ~ ~ Q)
~ Q) .0
~ 6
~ ~
'3:
Eo-< c:
Z 0
~ CIl~ ~
"c:l ~~ .!:2
=
U 0.
= << 0.
E ~~ co
~ .!Q
Eo- 0
J. ~~ ..c:
~ I-
~ c;ffi
Q.,
V)
~
0
t"-
o
I
~
= 0 "c:l
Z 0 .loi
N =
~ -= u
r,; ~ CIl <Ii II ]
S = .....:l
U ~ .... ~ u
~ =
...
.... ~
~ 8
= ~
~ =
~
.
.
CASE #: ..rr-S Z003 .= e>/03
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
- '~_~r:-~'~ Telephone: 727-562-4567
o ~ Fax: 727-562-4865
~UBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
0/' SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
" SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 4 ~-
; Clearwater
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
(Revised 11105/02)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: Co VR. 1 <S-t c e. e--\ e v\.-t e ~ p ( 'I...>t:~' (,. [7~ v I d r ( l:> ( \ ~ k-f c) jIJ
I
Vh-.
MAILING ADDRESS:
-1f8
~ r cA. t'~
Ie \ l vV S+.
C. \ 'fC\.C "Vt~-I.. + e ~
~'
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
r.J.--
(Must include ALL owners)
e..-.L+
~AGENT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
I~ ~<(
-So
H;' II c( ~ or:>-+- AJe.
C leOl. (' wo-+~ \'
f="1- 3"5/~fq
PHONE NUMBER: '1;)7 I../q:J.. 5""'5" '31
FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
E-MAIL ADDRESS: NOI.
, r r . Gt:'JyII\
PARCEL NUMBER:
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS: 7o? ~r~k- /,'tV 5fref'+
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: pleu<,~ <i-e..f1 E.x::~',\o"r+ .fA'1
I ~ / J. &f / I~- / 5 ~ ^/ t)' 0 j 0 / / /
11 I / I _ .. / i' \I /
I' I e~ 'Se e tX h , 'b \ --t A {J-V\..
C J.t!!a r ux:x::I~ r
~~
F/.-
PARCEL SIZE:
tJo [).o
Deed
O~4-z...-> A.
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 1<.1'....,+ &If. r ~ uV'L-+ I3cA () ,vi i ~+ C-. i vl b
(number of dwelling units, hote{ rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
'2
J
~ Ol9-YVl =s
~, dOd
f
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):
w
/l. I '"
(in lude all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required numb
SCe~
10 IJ.n1. E.lde (+C(', 0'\.1"110' ~T c1e F.(la"+'-lf';~~ N(7<.-f,'&-A.J /,',;~ ~~'$ I
tJPI.-t,'lHlJ L~,\c.S I r/'r(' f.JtA( I dltxc..f-:v'\.:. ,&.(' ..... Ni1"'"+' CilAb. c
.AII fJa(,K.,lv:{ w//I be 1fe('r~fJt'V'.. fOlfl\:ld ~(~ ~,...]iLI be.. ,,';;.;;;/)
. .
I DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
t DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO -X. (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
1< SUBMIT A COpy OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
2.
The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the nei
use. jt...R ~O'll~~ w-iLI .k OL re~..fct.tr~l/VI,+ hC/-? d-""'
Mii:;"~/~ ~~~ ~ J tv~ VJr~~ Ci~y;r~ k.
I 10 r d II /
4. inimize t[a IC congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
~1t ;d/ "11~ {l~~ wffl'~~ .::, IIw I'~~
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory an
on adjacent properties.
o
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearw ater
.
.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development
Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study w ill be used in
determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) and color rendering if pOSSible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearw ater
.
.
G. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COpy OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COpy OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
H.
LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
I
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color
rendering, if possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearw ater
~.
, 0
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: ( ection 4-801.C)
Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L.
SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
n,'3
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS '1 ~
before f'!}e this ~ day of
20 CO 3 to me and/or by
:::>, '~s personally known has
, Q. S as
62c~~
Signature of property owner or representative
~~~~
Not pu ic, .
My ommlSSlon expires:
MY COMMISSION # CC 883726
f':'i'.r"-,.::,: Nov 27,2003
1"80n~2)-NOTA~\.
~:{.;niif';p, & BOriding Co.
-.'.---...--.--
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearw ater
.
M.
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
C1.1'I,^- r +- "::;+r .e ",:-t-
E'A'fe-cFr:<;l"S
~
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
'10':;- y rcvV1- ~ l ~ v0 '5+ , C- \ Ii! (<J w t>Lk r fJ--
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
I<...I?.,.,-f CA r DL&A/-vV1- ,J- N,'rh..+ t..t u A fA.}~
k
-
N ~..J
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
/\/'7t".-1
tt'll.sJ-e>.. A "- 'I. ~ r'r)
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6. That (,/we). the ""de<s~,.d ""'horilY. hereby oemfy tha' ,he fa"",o'" i, hue .,d "'~ _ /'
propertyown~
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
My Commission Expires:
S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment review 12002 Formslflexible standard development application 2002.doc
Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater
Jul 17 03 04:03p
T.as Jennings
.;L
,'/9P'l
. /d5t;.
~
72. S 1>:~(.~;~:1 ~.
p.2
.:/;:. .:. ....:-,.\.:,.~.)
". "..,." ;'
_,_,- >... ....~ ";'..r..:}',
?~~iE'.l ~S :;:~]t. .~~.:t =, :~~~?=:"k
----.---_...._~._.__ __~~_._n..._.___.._ __.
;-~i3C2?9f.:'.: C:.;-il-2,:~C!3 };~DE :,,:"/
DE~:-Ei~:?~' .:~~JL~; Ir .'~~'
Prepared by and return to:
:J2","~'81o. 3DIC ~d ~':~DL~M!:~f/:.
:g:C3~,:;::~.937 !~<~~:25f'; SPE;: 2:~l2';. ~~;L~ :;2..:' ~\,
::~E:S~S;Ir~G :f2 ?~::3ES
.;.
......."J' ~
DuG ST ~'!~~::" ,- DR~.'~:3
~~'^. .
Sun Gulf Title, LLC
31564 U.S. Hwy 19 N.
Clearwater, FL 33760
--" '.'- :~.1aa
,:". c5~~
f~
I:.: ~.7-. .'
. - .,"-'-", ",- .~.
8~ECK ,~ifT.: t~I~tR:J ~
,",,:: ....,... -'.:
.... '," /." .
"'_ '-:__H .
~.~~f~~GE AML:.~::~T ~
;,o'~ '-:"'-'_"
File Number: 03-586
Will Call No.:
;~'11l. ~-~.. .._" .~, --,.,
~ .Jl::"'~:~ I~ ::"':::'It~,.
[Space Above This Une For Recording Data' 03-094937 MAR- 1 1-2003 9: 06AM
L- PINELLAS CO BK 12589 PG 2629
111111111111 ~m II"IIIIIIIII~ lID lmlllllllll
Warranty Deed
This Warranty Deed made this 6th day of March, 2003 between Ewart Holdings Inc., a Florida corporation whose
post office address is P.O. Box 747, Largo, FL 33779, grantor, and Court Street Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation,
as to 2/3rds ownership and Joseph J. Hirschfeld, as Trustee. as to 1I3rd ownership whose post office address is 704
Court Street, Clearwater, FL 33756, grantee:
(Whenever used herein the tcnns "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs. legal representatives, and assigns of
individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees)
Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum ofTEN AND NO/tOO DOLLARS ($10.00) and other
good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,
has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land,
situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida to-wit:
Legal Description set forth on Exhibit "A" attached.
Parcel Identification Number: 15/29/15/54450/011/0020
Grantor warrants that at the time of this conveyance, the subject property is not the Grantor's
homestead within the meaning set forth in the constitution of the state of Florida, nor is it contiguous
to or a part of homestead property.
Together -."illt all the tenements, heredjtalf~nts and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaIning.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the
grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said
land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of aU persons whomsoevCJ'; and that said land is free of all
encumbrances, except ta.'"{es accruing subsequent to December 31,2002.
In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year fIrSt above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence:
It., .."
l...
By:
.,- ~;.""I"/-~-~- ~:
~-\..I.....
, .~'~~~:;,=:~~~~]
Witness Name:"'....~'": ,"\.\":-
State of Florida
County of Pinellas
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 6~ day of March, .2003 by Michael Howland, President of Ewart
Holdings Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He/she U IS personally known to me or [X] has produced
a driver's license as identification.
I
[Notary Seal]
-t1:l.. GWENOOI.BiI F.1ICCRAN1E
:~~ MV COMMISSION' DO 115249
. : EXPIRES: May 6. 2000
9oI1dtdn.u"'Pd:~
, . ~JL~L:U
Public' ,
Printed Name:
My Commission Expires:
~----
Jul 17 03 04:03p
ThOW Jennings
727.1.2919
p.3
PINELLAS COUNTY FLA.
OFF,REC.8K 12589 PG 2630
Exhibit "A"
i\ PART OF LOTS 2 , 3 , 8 and !t " 8LOCK "11" , ""GNOI.I"
P~RK , AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOX 3 , PAGE 43 OF TH! PUBLIC R~RDS OP
PINEL LAS COUNTY , FLORIDA , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :
FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID at-eCk "11" I RUN THENCE: EAST,
73.45 FT. F02 THE POIN'l' OF BEGJNNING: THENCE RUN N 0015'12" E,
314.34 FT. TO THE SOutH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FRANKLIN STREET ALSO
"
BEING THE NORTH LINE Of' SAID BLOCK "11": THENCE S 89058'00" Ii: ,
ALONG SAID NORTH LINE: Of' BLOCK "II" , 58.82 FT. ; THENCE S 0052'
44" E , 314.34 F"'1'. TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COURT STREET
,
ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OP SAID BLOCK "11" : THENCE HUT, ALONG
SAID SOOTH LIN! OF BLOCK "II" , 65.03 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
/I ''''1 ".:"
.
.
,"""'~
,",\~~LOF Tilt);'"
~\t:..\ ~"......"..c;7x--
,~"., I ~. ....~-:.
..~." \ J. ';;. a""
-.. .......,~,../.,--: ';\.,) , ~ ~..
~~a"......-....."....'..~... <X:~
'Or::::... ..,. (:;)-.
,"P:'::, ..'... ~..
~-:s?.6"" ... ,'("",-j\
....:rlA;;F;,~~'.'t~,\\
~#:j/I1TEO '\ ..
",. 01,1'
."1"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
July 21, 2003
Mr. Nigel Castanheiro
1235 S. Hillcrest Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
RE: Application for Flexible Standard approval (FLS2003-07035) to re-establish the use for an upscale
restaurant with an entertainment cafe' and a nightclub in the Downtown Zoning District, under the
provisions of Section 2-902.F. and Section 2-902.M.
Dear Mr. Castanheiro:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to re-establish the use for an upscale restaurant with an
entertainment cafe' and a nightclub, under the provisions of Section 2-902.F. and Section 2-902.M.at 703
Franklin Street. The proposal includes a provision that the restaurant will open at 4 pm and that parking will be
directed to the public garage located west of the municipal services building. After a preliminary review of the
submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete.
Please provide the following:
1. Specific criteria for Section 2-902.F. and Section 2-902.M. of the Community Development Code.
2. All proposed freestanding and attached signs; provide details including location, size, height, colors,
materials and drawing to show placement on building and site.
The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2003-
07035.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 14,2003 in
the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services
Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie
Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the
approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to
answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. Additional comments will be
generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or adittmer@clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely yours,
~~--..--- -~
Arden Dittmer
Development Review Specialist
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRClFranklin St 703 - CastanheirolFranklin St 703 complete. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYr HAMII:l'ON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER (i) BllJ,jONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAl. EMPLOYMENT AN!) AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
. -
. ,
BRYAN, EDWARD P
JEMAL, CLAUDIA
814 FRANKLIN ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5514
COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIR
1250 ROGERS ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756-
TACK & WARREN INC
806 PIERCE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5526
LIKMET A, ALl
LIKMET A, SHERIFE
9 N CIRUS AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3102
GOLDEN, LOLITA A TRUST
C/O GOLDEN, THOMAS A JR
439 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2139
ALL AROUND YOUR HOME INC
PO BOX 413
CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0413
WE CARE FASHIONS INC
807 COURT ST
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5509
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
e
RODRIGUEZ, REINALDO
DIAL, RUTH
1306 RIVERSIDE DR
TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 -
BROWN, NORMAN G
BROWN, CONSTANCE S
805 PIERCE ST
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5525
TSAMIS, DENO TRE
TSAMIS, MINA TRE
3234 HYDE PARK DR
CLEARWATERFL 33761 - 1813
NEWSPAPER REALTY CO OF
CLW
C/O THE HEARST CORP
227 W TRADE ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202 - 1675
HELO INC
439 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATERFL 33767-
HAZELWOOD, MAXWELL G
430 LARBOARD WAY STE 1
CLEARWATERFL 33767-
KAHLMEYER, JAMES C TRE
811 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5501
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATERFL 33758 - 4748
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
/l / r ~ ? ~' - <-
e /-~I~)OD~:(-D7 "j-
RATTRAY, CHRIS L
2974 COUNTRY WOODS LN
PALM HARBOR FL 34683 -
TACK & WARREN INC
803 PIERCE ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5525
DEEGAN, JOHN F TRE
1560 GULF BLVD # 1504
CLEARWATERFL 33767-
GOLDEN, LOLITA A TRUST
C/O GOLDEN, THOMAS A JR
439 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATERFL 33767 - 2139
ALL AROUND YOUR HOME INC
PO BOX 413
CLEARWATERFL 33757 - 0413
HAZELWOOD, MAXWELL G
430 LARBOARD WAY STE 1
CLEARWATERFL 33767-
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748
CLEARWATER, CITY OF
PO BOX 4748
CLEARWATER FL 33758 -
TIMES PUBLISHING CO INC
PO BOX 1121
ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 1121
FILE
\ .
TIMES PUBLISHING CO INC
PO BOX 1121
ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 1121
e
CEPCOT CORP
14480 62ND ST N
CLEARWATERFL 33760 - 2721
e
EWART HOLDINGS INC
POBOX 747
LARGO FL 33779 - 0747
TIMES PUBLISHING CO INC OSBURG, SYBIL M PINELLAS COUNTY
PO BOX 1121 OSBURG, STEPHEN C ATTN:GEN SERV/R E
ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 1121 700 COURT ST 315 COURT ST
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5508 CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5165
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
RELIGIOUS TRUST BOARD OF TRUSTEES BOARD OF TRUSTEES
319 S GARDEN AVE 319 S GARDEN AVE 319 S GARDEN AVE
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5423
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES BOARD OF TRUSTEES BOARD OF TRUSTEES
319 S GARDEN AVE 319 S GARDEN AVE 319 S GARDEN AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER FL 33756 -
CLEARWATER DEPOT INC CLEARWATER DEPOT INC CONNELLY, JOHN P
C/O PINCH A PENNY INC POBOX 6025 630 CHESTNUT ST
POBOX 6025 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6025 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5337
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6025
CONNELLY, JOHN INTERVEST BANK BASKIN, H H SR RENTAL
630 CHESTNUT ST 625 COURT ST PROPERTIES INC
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5337 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5528 703 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5507
BASKIN, H H SR RENTAL KAPET ANOPOULOS, THANASIS KAPET ANOPOULOS, THANASIS
PROPER TIES INC KAPETANOPOULOS, KAPETANOPOULOS,
703 COURT ST DIMITRIOS DIMITRIOS
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5507 1704 SIMMONS CT 1704 SIMMONS CT
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5507 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5507
CLEARWATER VILLAGE BASKIN, H H SR RENTAL PINELLAS COUNTY
MINKOFF, SUE TRE PROPERTIES INC ATTN: REAL ESTATE MGMT
423 CLEVELAND ST 703 COURT ST 315 COURT ST
CLEARWATERFL 33755- CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5507 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165
FRONTIER PROPERTIES PINELLAS COUNTY PELICAN BAY L TD INC
504 S MYRTLE AVE ATTN: REAL ESTATE MGMT 639 CHESTNUT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5614 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5336
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165
WARREN L TD TACK & WARREN INC CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
806 PIERCE ST 806 PIERCE ST BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5526 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5526 319 S GARDEN AVE
CLEARWATERFL 33756-
.
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
319 S GARDEN AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423
INTERVEST BANK
625 COURT ST
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5528
e
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
118 N FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4019
CEPCOT CORP
POBOX 6025
CLEARWATERFL 33758 - 6025
e
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
RELIGIOUS TRUST
319 S GARDEN AVE
CLEARWATERFL 33756 - 5423
PORPOISE POOL & PATIO INC
PO BOX 6025
CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 6025
.
.
1""""
. ",\~~LOF Tlil .........
,'l~ \l.,..."",~~';'_
.. ~""'l ~~""..'7-':.
....~~ \ , . .':. c>'O
"",~~,"'" / .'i' ~......-
:C"'::>>~'~~C".~ c. 'c::t::
..r:: ~ ..,,~:.:: Q~
'Of'<<" ~ . .'......... ;:::;:;..
_~.... ..W.. ... '~';..
':.. 'iJ:",mwNN J.*\'" ..\
.. rp'J. '##1.'- ~V: ,"
............)1TE~".,..
'#11"
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
July 23,2003
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL AT 703 FRANKLIN STREET (FLS2003-07035)
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 703 Franklin Street, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives
notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The request is to
permit a restaurant and nightclub with an entertainment cafe within the Downtown District utilizing shared,
existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the subject site under the provisions of
Section 2-902.F and M. The proposal includes a 1,368 square-foot upscale restaurant and a 4,598 square-foot
nightclub establishment with an entertainment cafe located within an existing 13,526 square-foot building.
On August 14, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will
review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community
Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development
Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will
make a decision on the application will be August 21, 2003.
The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application.. You may phone me at 727-
562-4604 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be
considered in the City's review of the application.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within
the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review
Committee meeting (August 14, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning
Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through the City's
website: www.clearwater-fl.com or my direct email addressatadittmer@clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
~ ---===-
Arden Dittmer
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIStandard FlexlPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRCIFranldin St 703 - CastanheirolFranklin St 703 notification,doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR,COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIOKER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bn,LJONSON, COM~IISSI0KER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
I-
Revised 8/13/03
LL
. 0
>-
o
ACTION AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, AUGUST 14,2003
9:00 a.m.
Staff Review
9:30 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-07027 - 2562 Sweetgum Way West
Owner/Applicant: Jim and Lorraine Bernardi / Ash Farid (31555 US 19 North, Palm Harbor, FL 34684,
cell: 422-1221, fax: 771-7887; email: amadeusfg(Q)msn.com).
Location: 0.21 acres located on the west side of Sweet gum Way, approximately 300 feet south of Deer Run
North.
Atlas Page: 222B.
Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the rear (west) setback from
15 feet to 11 feet for an addition in association with an existing detached dwelling, under the provisions of
Section 2-203.B.2.
Neighborhood Association: Northwood Estates Homeowners Association; Attn: Bob Deiley, PO Box
14732, Clearwater, FL 33766.
Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
ApplicantlRepresentative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic Em!:ineerine::
a) No Comments
4. General Ene:ineerine::
a) No Comments
5. Plannine::
a) This application meets criteria.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No Comments
7. Land Resources:
a) Do not remove trees previously permitted until FLS case is approved. Prior approval may be
rescinded should this case not be approved.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 1
I
8. Fire:
a) No Comments
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Community Response:
a)
11. LandscapiDl!::
a) No Comments
NOTES:
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 2
9:40 p.m.
Case: FLS2003-07035 - 703 Franklin Street
Owner/Applicant: Court Street Enterprises.
Representative: Nigel Castanheiro (1235 S. Hillcrest Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756; telephone 727-492-
5534; nags@tampabay.rr.com).
Location: 0.425 acres on the south side of Franklin Street, approximately 120 feet west of Myrtle Avenue.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard Development approval to re-establish a restaurant,
entertainment cafe' and nightclub previously approved by DRC (FLS 01-01-04) and CDB (FL 01-03-16).
Proposed Use: Restaurant, entertainment cafe' and nightclub.
Neighborhood Association: None.
Presenter: Arden Dittmer, Development Review Specialist.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic En!!:ineeriDl?::
a) Show on the site plan required number of Handicapped parking stalls and h.c. access path into the
entrance.
b) Describe where employees and patrons will park before 5 p.m. when municipal service parking
garage is not opened to the public.
c) All of the above to be addressed prior to D.O.
4. General En!!:ineerin!!::
a) No Comments
5. Plannin!!::
a) Any proposed outdoor seating?
b) Signs? Colors? Materials? Meet existing Downtown Design Guidelines.
er PaR'.i:A.g 8N llitY'3'"'VaCallllulllUl a.I~tinn...
d) All comments resolved prior to Development Order.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Garbage can in alley
7. Land Resources:
a) No Comments
8. Fire:
a) Full function test on kitchen hood suppression system to be conducted and witnessed by Fire
Inspector prior to C of O. (This test must be coordinated with the licensed hood suppression
contractor, the licensed fITe alarm contractor, a Clearwater Fire Inspector, a representative from
Clearwater Gas and a representative of the building/business owner)
b) Reacceptance test of the fITe alarm system as per NFP A-72 to ensure proper audible and visual
occupant notification witnessed by Fire Inspector, and a current alarm certification by licensed
fire alarm contractor must be provided prior to C of 0
c) Occupant load, determined by Fire Department, and signage provided by the Fire Dept, must be
posted prior to C of O.
d) Verification of full Fire Sprinkler coverage, and current fire sprinkler certification to be provided
to the Fire Department by a licensed fITe sprinkler contractor prior to C of O.
e) Full Fire Inspection of the premises to be conducted prior to C ofO.
t) Relocate FDC from it's present location on the building to a minimum distance of 15 ft from the
building and within 40 ft of the fITe hydrant.
g) Code summary to reflect compliance with Florida Fire Prevention Code-200l to be verified on
Final Inspection prior to C of O.
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Communitv Response:
a)
11. Landscapine:
a) All dead and dying plant material to be replaced prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
il
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 3
I
NOTES:
. TIF to be determined and paid prior to e.O. (Since it will include a restaurant).
~
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 4
u
10:00 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-07029 - 2377 Warwick Drive
Owner/Applicant: Mr. And Mrs. Neil Legters (2377 Warwick Drive, Clearwater, FL 33763; telephone
727-562-4595; e-mail: nlegters(a)clearwater-t1.com ).
Location: 0.17 acres located on the south side of Warwick Drive, approximately 200 feet west of
Moorehaven Drive.
Atlas Page: 232A.
Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the rear (south) setback from
15 feet to 10 feet for a bathroom addition, under the provisions of Section 2-203.B.
Proposed Use: Existing single-family residence.
Neighborhood Association(s): Woodgate Neighbors, Mr. Peter Greenlees, 2229 Willowtree Terrace,
Clearwater, FL 33763; Woodgate III Neighbors, Vice President, Mr. Steve Pahioian, 2360 Hazelwood
Lane, Clearwater, FL 33763.
Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist; Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Duanne Anderson, Rick Albee
ApplicantfRepresentative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic En!!:ineerin2:
a) No Comments
4. General En2ineerin2:
a) No Comments
5. Plannin!!::
a) Meets criteria.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No Comments
7. Land Resources:
a) No Comments
8. Fire:
a) No Comments
9. Environmental:
a) No comments
10. Community Resoonse:
a)
11. Landscaoin2:
a) No comments
NOTES:
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 5
10:10 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-07030 - 604 East Druid Road
Owner: Mr. And Michael McClure (809 Druid Road, Clearwater, FL 33756; telephone 727-461-3232).
Applicant: Mr. Stephen Watts (809 Druid Road, Clearwater, FL 33756; telephone 727-461-3232; fax:
727-441-8048; email: wattslaw({i),gte.net).
Location: 0.73 acres located on the north side of Druid Road, approximately 400 feet east of South Fort
Harrison Avenue.
Atlas Page: 295B.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard approval to change the use from retail sales and service to
office in the Downtown zoning District and to enclose the existing drive through facility to create additional
office space, under the provisions of Section 2-902.G.
Proposed Use: Office.
Neighborhood Association: Harbor Oaks Association, Vice President, Mr. David Martens, 425 Lotus
Path, Clearwater, FL 33756.
Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist; Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson,
ApplicantlRepresenta tive:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No comments
3. Traffic En2ineerim!:
a) Show dimensions for parking stalls i.e. width, angle and drive aisles.
b) Add "Do not enter signs, "One-way signs" and/or "One-way arrows" painted on the ground, and
Stop signs with stop bars where appropriate complying with the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD) standards.
c) Include current City details of handicapped parking stall and handicapped sign.
d) Need to show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles.
e) All of the above to be addressed prior to D.O.
f) Traffic Impact Fees to be detennined and paid prior to e.O.
4. General Ene:ineerine::
a) No comments
5. Plannin2:
a) What is proposed with the utility shed at the northeast comer of the property? Noticed there is a
power meter and an electric outlet behind the shed that appeared to be supplying power to the
homeless living on the site.
b) Need one set of Color Elevations
c) Consider connecting the stoop leading from door on rear of property to have path or accessibility.
d) Freestanding sign - same background color, same color front.
e) Underground utilities?
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments
7. Land Resources:
a) Show root prune lines on plan and a cross section through the proposed area prior to building
pennit.
8. !2lli
a) No comments
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Community Response:
a)
11. Landscapin2:
i
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 6
It
NOTES:
I
a) Small areas that show sod should be changed to blue pacific juniper or jasmine minima for easier
maintenance. See Arden Dittmer for specific areas.
b) Sight triangles need not be left open, low plantings are permitted up to 30" tall; suggest expanding
the (RI) Indian Azalea.
c) Change plants at west entrance to 1 gallon jasmine or similar as not to damage existing tree roots.
d) Address prior to permit.
. Code summary to reflect adherence to FFPC-2001
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 7
10:30 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-0703l/PLT2003-00008 - 100 N. Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Clearwater Village Inc. / Kenneth Roush (601 South Cleveland Street Suite 930
Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 443-2869, fax: 446-8036; email: nesale(c/),mindspring.com).
Location: 3.5 acres located on the northwest comer of Laura Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue.
Atlas Page: 287 A.
Zoning: D, Downtown District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard Development approval for attached dwellings within the
Downtown District under Section 2-902.C.
Proposed Use: Attached dwellings with 47 units.
Neighborhood Association: North Greenwood Association Inc.; Attn: Jonathon Wade, 908 Pennsylvania
Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33755. Drew and Plaza Park Neighborhood Association; Attn: Brian and Michelle
King, 911 Plaza Street, Clearwater, FL 33755.
Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater: (WHEN)
a) Collection system in parking lot appears to be undersized.
b) How will site runoff tie into town pond?
c) Have buy in details been resolved?
3. Traffic En!!:ineerin!!::
a) Civil site plan must include an outline of the canopy and the columns supporting the canopy, 9' x
19' parking stalls must be free of intrusions from columns.
b) Civil and landscape site plans must show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at all street
intersections. No structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level
between thirty inches (30") above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance
triangle. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904).
c) Do the proposed driveways align with existing driveways or intersections across the street? Show
adjacent driveways.
d) Will this be a gated community? If so provide location of gate and console operating the gate.
e) Show dimensions on all parking spaces.
1) All of the above to be addressed prior to D.O.
4. General En!!:ineerin!!:: (WHEN)
a) Common areas shown on proposed plat don't match the proposed civil site plan (between units 42
& 43, units 35 & 36, units 4 & 5).
b) Setback shown on sheet C3.l for unit #23 shows 12 ft. and on plat shows common area "A"
being 12.53 ft.? Unit #24 shows 13 ft. setback on sheet C3.1 and the plat shows 13.58 ft. for
common area "A"?
c) Common area "C" exactly shows 10.0 ft. on both the plat and sheet C3.l?
d) Notes "saw cut match existing" for both drive aprons on Martin Luther King, Jr. Ave. North and
Booth Avenue must read, "remove to the nearest joint"
e) Down ramps at the drive aprons @ street right-of-ways to meet A.D.A.requirements and installed
in alignment with existing sidewalk.
1) Entrance islands: Are they going to have a radius at the end or are they going to be squared off?
g) All water meters should be shown off of the existing water mains within the public right-of-way of
Laura Street and Grove Street (Ordinance Section 32.096 and Redevelopment Code Section 3-
806). The proposed fIre hydrants may be relocated closer to Booth Ave and Martin Luther King
JI. Avenue and may be installed without connecting them with a loop around the pool area.
h) Need to add a note "Core" existing manhole for proposed 8" sanitary sewer main connection.
i) The current address for this property is 100 Martin Luther King, JI. Avenue North.
5. Plannin!!::
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 8
a) Need 4 handicap parking spaces based on the 82 parking spaces shown per (Section 3-1409).
Place another one on the western half of the parcel. Prior to Development Order.
b) Need a scaled drawing showing height.
c) Submit proposed project value.
d) Chain link fences are prohibited in the Downtown District per (Section 3-805). Is this a
construction chain link fence or part of the internal design.
e) Any proposed signage for the development?
f) Will either of the entrances off Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue or Booth Avenue be gated?
g) Utilities underground (on site and right of way).
h) Limit the colors of the fac;ade to four or five and remove the intense colors.
i) How will colors be managed if future owner wants to repaint with a new color?
j) Prior to Development Order.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Dumpster enclosures will not work at this angle. Suggest compactor for entire complex at east
dumpster site
7. Land Resources:
a) Tree survey is incomplete and inaccurate, 3 trees did not get surveyed and a sampling of DBH
was offby 5 inches.
b) Tree inventory required prior to any site design. Inventory conducted which revealed that some
trees designated to be preserved should be removed because of their poor condition. Obtain a
copy of my inventory and revise plans accordingly. Consideration must be given to the critical
root zones and canopies of these trees in regard to the locations of utilities and vertical structures.
Prior to Development Order.
c) Provide a Tree Preservation Plan. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, storm
water and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how you propose to address these
impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this
plan must show actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if
required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree
preservation. Prior to Building Permit
8. Environmental:
a) No water quality treatment on plans- interested in Town Lake buy in (prior to building permit)?
b) Pay prior to building permit.
9. Fire:
a) Provide 24 ft fire department access on the Booth Av. and MLK Av. entrances. Prior to
Development Order.
10. Communitv Response:
a)
11. Landscapin2;:
a) Live oaks (QV) are indicated within 35' of one another, suggest removing several from plan or
relocating to elsewhere on the site.
b) Sabal palms (SP) are shown as individual or in groups of two, Code requires groupings of three to
meet the tree requirement for perimeter plantings. Please adjust by adding additional palms to the
groupings.
c) Crepe Myrtle (CM) is shown as individual plants, Code requires groupings of two to meet the tree
requirement for perimeter plantings. Please adjust by adding additional plants to the groupings.
In some cases adjusting the distance separation between the plants can be adjusted to bring them
into compliance.
d) All connnents prior to Development Order.
NOTES:
. Code summary to reflect adherence with FFPC-2001
. TIF to be determined and paid prior to e.O.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 9
I
11:00 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-07032/PLT2003-00007 - 2400 Varsity Drive
Owner: Mr. George Hunt
Applicant: Mr. Thomas L. Heironimus (633 Poinsettia Road, Belleair, FL 33756; telephone 727-638-2592
Location: 7.22 acres located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Varsity Drive and Oberlin Drive.
Atlas Page: 281B.
Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Applications for Preliminary Plat approval and Flexible Standard Development approval to
reduce the front setbacks from 25 feet to zero feet (to private streets), under the provisions of Section 2-
203.C.
Proposed Use: A new 32-10t single-family subdivision.
Neighborhood Association: Northeast Regional Home Owners Group, President Mr. Dennis Roper (995
Lake Forest, Clearwater, FL 33765).
Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist; Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees must be satisfied prior to the
issuance of building permits or final plat, whichever occurs first. Contact Deb Richter at 562-
4817.
2. Stormwater:
a) Grading plan requires typical house pad and driveway for each lot.
b) Show pond outfall on plan view sheet
c) Site requires soil boring to identify seasonal high water utilized in drawdown cales.
d) Garage pads required to be 6" above crown ofroad
e) Use appropriate tail water from Alligator Creek Watershed Management Plan for tail water at
outfall structure.
f) Grade lots to streets to eliminate rear swale or pipe swale with inlets at the rear of each property.
g) House pads will be required to be above the 100-year flood plain elevation. Neighborhood streets
will be required to be above the 10-year flood plain elevation.
h) Any fill within the 100-year floodplain will require compensatory storage.
i) Flood plain information from Alligator Creek Watershed Management Plan (WMP) from node
A0300 (upstream of site) and node A0290 (downstream of site). Corresponding info for 24 hr 10
year event (A0300 = 27.05, A0290 = 26.29), 24 hr 25 year event (A0300 = 27.64, A0290 =
26.86),24 hr 100 year event (A0300 = 28.51, A0290 = 27.77). These values are slightly higher
than the FEMA 100 year elevation of 27. However, the information from the WMP is the "best
available data" and will be used in the review of sites in the Alligator Creek Watershed.
j) All comments addressed prior to Development Order.
3. Traffic Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Private road must be a minimum of 24' wide from edge of pavement to edge of pavement
b) Show on the site plans the proposed gate and console to operate and how it will operate.
c) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the intersection. No structures or landscaping may be
installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty inches (30") above grade and eight
feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's Community Development Code,
Section 3-904).
d) All of the above to be addressed prior to D.O
4. General Enl!ineerinl!;:
a) Need to show taps for both proposed water main extensions on existing mains (example: 4" x 4"
tapping sleeve and valve) prior to Building Permit.
b) Need to extend the loop connection to the existing 6" water main on Ruskin Road instead of the
4" x 4" tap connection to the existing 4" water main on Varsity Drive prior to Development
Order.
c) Some/all of the details shown are not city details. Need to update the detail sheet Prior to
Building Permit.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 10
I
PL T2003-0007
d) Do lot lines need to extend to the center of the road? Could the plat show a 50-foot ROW labeled
as a common element?
e) Property lines for lots 7 through 13 should extend to the subdivision boundary line and create a
drainage easement for the ponds.
f) Label street names.
g) All plat issues to be resolved before fmal plat submittal.
5. Planning::
a) Grade elevations indicate that site drainage is going northward at the rear oflots 1-7 and 13-20.
Yet no easements are shown. Indicate proposed drainage easements and width;
b) Need to show where section A-A of the pond was taken from on page C-3;
c) Based on typical lot design submitted and with required setbacks it is noted that accessory
structures, such as but not limited to sheds and swimming pools are not provided for;
d) Need cross sections of berm (lots 4-7 and 13-20) as shown on page C-3;
e) Provide description of what the area between lot nine and ten and the area at the north of the
property are to be utilized as?
f) Provide impervious surface area calculation for the typical lot and those noted under number two
above; and
g) What are the intentions for the eight foot concrete wall along north-east boundary of the
subdivision;
h) It is not understood how a 75-foot x 50-foot structure is going to fit onto lots 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13,
26, and 27. Need lot designs for these lots showing all structures, including streets, driveways,
patios and sidewalks;
i) Provide elevation drawings (typical) of proposed single family residence
j) All utilities underground.
k) All comments addressed prior to Development Order.
6. Solid Waste:
a) All Black Barrels must be stored according to city code Sec.32.281
7. Land Resources:
a) Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a Certified Arborist. This plan must show how the
proposed building, roadways, storm water and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines)
and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root
aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of
the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), the tree barricade detail and any other
pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Prior to Building Permit.
b) Revise tree barricade detail to meet City standards, 2x2 post with lx4 rail, no ribbon permitted.
Prior to Building Permit.
8. Elli
a) Ingress/egress roads are a required fire lane and shall be designated as such by proper signage to
be installed by developer and maintained by homeowners association.
b) Maximum distance between hydrants for residential use is 500 ft. Add hydrants as required to
comply with ordinance.
c) Prior to Development Order.
9. Environmental:
a) Alligator Creek is identified in the Clearwater Wetland Atlas (7/29/16-3). A IS-foot buffer is
required from top of bank. (City ordinance sect 3-907) prior to Development Order.
10. Community Response:
a)
11. Landscaping::
a) If there is to be a gated area, it would be best to submit a landscape plan for review for the
common areas.
NOTES:
. TIF to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
. Will need to be rescheduled for another Development Review Committee Meeting.
. Received emails and letters in response to application (included in the Development Order)
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 11
11 :45 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-06026 - 605 Edenville Avenue
Owner/Applicant: Mr. Donald K. Jackson (605 Edenville Ave, Clearwater, FL 33764; telephone: 727-
726-0391).
Location: 0.14 acres located on the east side of Edenville Avenue approximately 500 feet south of Gulf to
Bay Boulevard.
Atlas Page: 299B.
Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the side (south) setback from
5 feet to one inch for an aluminum carport and driveway, as a Residential Infill Project, under the
provisions of Section 2-203.C
Proposed Use: Single-Family residence.
Neighborhood Association: None.
Presenter: John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist; Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comment
2. Stormwater:
a) Demonstrate that storm water runoff will not adversely affect neighbor.
3. Traffic Enl!:ineerinl!::
a) No Comment
4. General Enl!:ineerine:
a) Overhang for this carport can't extend into the neighbors air space? Need to show an elevation
drawing.
5. Planninl!::
a) The proposed aluminum carport is not characteristic to the surrounding neighborhood at a I-inch
setback from side property.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No Comments
7. Land Resources:
a) No Comments
8. ~
a) No Comment
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Community Response:
a)
11. Landscapinl!::
a) No comments
NOTES:
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 12
it
1:00 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-07033 - 201 Palm Island SW
Owner: Robert Longenecker (rlnecker(a)bellsouth.net ).
Location: 0.23 acres located at the end of the southwest Palm Island terminus, approximately 300 feet west
ofIsland Way.
Atlas Page: 258B.
Zoning: IEOD-LMDR, Island Estates Overlay District-Low Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard Development approval to add additional living space on top of
the principal structure, maintaining the current 18.5 feet rear (northwest) setback to seawall and to extend
the existing rear terrace from 20 feet to 17.5 feet from seawall, under the provisions of Table 2-
1601(E).1.c., in the Island Estates Neighborhood Plan.
Proposed Use: Detached dwelling.
Neighborhood Association: Island Estates Civic Association; Attn.: John Bozmosky, PO Box 3154,
Clearwater, FL 33767.
Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
ApplicantlRepresentative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comment
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comment
3. Traffic En!!ineerin!!:
a) No Comment
4. General En!!ineerin!!:
a) No comments
5. Plannin!!:
a) The additional rear terrace measures 16 feet from seawall on the site plan. This addition is
considered as part of the principal structure and will reduce the existing rear setback from 18.5
feet to 16 feet or 17.5 feet whichevl?r is requested.
b) Will need to address FEMA regulations with building requirements in regards to additions.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No Comments
7. Land Resources:
a) No Comments
8. ~
a) No Comment
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Communitv Response:
a)
11. Landscapin!!:
a) No comments
NOTES:
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 13
i
1:15 a.m.
Case: FLS2003-07028 - 29383 US Highway 19 North
Owner/Applicant: Eastern Financial Florida Credit Union / Chase Broward (350 Franklin Road, Marietta,
GA, 33067; phone: 770-421-1532, fax: 770-422-9479, cell: 678-570-4620, email:
cbroward(ci)kdaholdingsinc.com ).
Location: 0.67 acres located on the eastern side of US Highway 19 N, approximately 200 feet south of
Northside Drive.
Atlas Page: l88B.
Zoning: C, Commercial District.
Request: Application for Flexible Standard Development approval to reduce the required number of
parking spaces from 21 to 17 for a bank as retail sales and service under Section 2-703.R.
Proposed Use: Bank.
Neighborhood Association: None.
Presenter: Bryan Berry, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson,
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic En!!ineerin!!:
a) Provide a cross walk from handicapped aisle to the accessible entrance of building. (Parallel lines
5' apart painted in white.)
b) Provide an accessible route from public sidewalk of US 19 to accessible building entrance.
(Chapter 11 Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 11-4.3.2)
c) Show dimensions for parking stalls i.e. width, angle.
d) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the intersections with stop signs.
e) No structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty
inches (30") above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's
Community Development Code, Section 3-904).
f) All of the above to be addressed prior to D.O
4. General En!!ineerin!!:
a) No Comments
5. Plannin!!:
a) Proposed Signage?
b) Project Value?
c) Curbing along the southeast comer of the lot where exit and drive isle meet should be extended to
maintain parking spaces room for entering and exiting parking spaces.
d) Prior to Development Order.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Dumpster enclosure needs to be built to City Specifications and shown on detail sheet, Turning
radius tight on east exit point prior to Development Order.
7. Land Resources:
a) Add note to plan that "Demolition of all paving and curbs under the canopy of all existing trees
shall be done by hand.
b) Revise tree barricade detail to reflect City standards, 2x2 uprights with lx4 rail, no ribbon
pennitted.
c) All addressed by Building Pennit.
8. Fire:
a) Provide vertical clearance of 13 ft 6 inches on east side of building.
b) Prior to Building Pennit.
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Community Response:
Development Review Conunittee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 14
a)
11. Landscapin2:
a) Need a revised plan that shows a larger curbed planter at entrance to drive-thru lanes, and expand
landscaping to fit in the new planter area.
NOTES:
Code summary to include adherence to FFPC-2001.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 15
u
1 :30 p.m.
Case: FLD2003-06030/PL T2003-00004 - 125 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas I
Owners: Robert W. and Donna L. DeStefano.
Applicant: Anthony Menna.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ email: nestechlaJmindspring.com).
Location: 0.32 acres on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 500 feet east of Harnden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east and
west) setbacks from 10 feet to 3.8 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement), reductions
of the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 17 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 13.3 feet (to pools) and from
20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 40.33 feet, and to
permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat slips and
existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six lots.
Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson, Tom Glenn, Wayne Wells, and Lisa
Fierce
ApplicantlRepresentative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Recreation Facility impact fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or
final plat, whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 10
existing hotel/motel guestrooms and 6 proposed residential units, $700 due.
2. Stormwater:
a) Show inverts of pond and side slopes on plan view. (before CDB)
b) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5. (before building permit)
c) Provide additional lot grading details showing swales and inverts conveying runoff to pond at rear
of site. (before CDB)
d) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds. (before CDB)
3. Traffic Enl?:ineerinl?::
a) Dimensions for all driveways must be shown i.e. width and length on sheet LA-I.
b) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at all driveways on Sheet LA-I. No structures or
landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty inches (30")
above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's Community
Development Code, Section 3-904).
c) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
d) TIF to be determined and paid prior to e.O.
4. General Enl?:ineerinl?::
a) Standard sanitary sewer "wye" is 6" not 4" as shown on sheet C5.I.
b) Clean out for sanitary sewer "wye's" need to be physically located at the property line.
c) Need to install a fire hydrant assembly for fire protection or show a second fire hydrant (existing
or proposed) within 500 feet.
d) Need a detail of a doghouse manhole shown on the detail sheet.
e) Proposed fire line main from the tap and one joint service side of the D.C.V.A. must be ductile
iron pipe.
t) Section A-A on Sheet C4.1 is not in agreement with detail on Sheet C6.I.
g) Revise the proposed sidewalk within the Brightwater Drive right-of-way on all appropriate sheets
to show a four-foot wide sidewalk (not five feet wide).
h) Revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
~
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 16
PL T2003-00004
i) Need cover sheet for plat (Dedication, Legal Description, Surveyors Certification, etc.).
j) Suggest to square off lot lines at rear of lots.
k) Show all lot line dimensions, bearings, etc.
1) Revise i-k prior to Final Plat submittal.
5. Plannine::
a) The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation 7.9.
With existing elevations at 4.9 on the east side and 5.0 on the west side, and proposed elevation
changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the building, this means on the
east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential. Are the edges of the driveways on
the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross sections at these locations.
b) Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is 2.4 feet
between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.2 feet grade differential on the
west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally constructed.
c) General comment regarding Sheet C6.l - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. If not
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
d) Denote on Sheet C2.1 the type(s) of trees on-site and on adjacent property.
e) Since this development is being subdivided/resubdivided, Section 3-1908.A states that "The city
may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way be relocated
and/or placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is redeveloped." Also
noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such under grounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transfonnation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground. Address on Sheets C2.1 and C5.1.
1) Waterfront visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The triangle is a
45-degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on the water and along
the side property line. Revise.
g) Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in elevation from livable area
to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations, including waterfront
visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
h) Building Code requires an l8-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
i) Revise Sheet C1.1 for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is proposed and
discussed in the narrative.
j) Dimension building on Sheet C3.1 and on Sheets E-l and E-2. Unclear where rear wall of
building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
k) Show on Sheets E-l and E-2 the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof, not top of
truss) from the required FFE (base flood elevation).
1) Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheets E-l and E-2 is
necessary. There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be muted by
any landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on the front and rear
elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as part of the cornice, molding
underneath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions of wall, quoins and like architectural
elements. Architectural elements on side elevations should be consistent with and complement
front and rear elevations. Concern: Elevations provided by Donoghue Wood & Associates Inc.
Architects look extremely similar to those provided for project at 116 Brightwater Drive by
Douglas W. Lowe, P.E. Building plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
m) Revise Sheet C1.1 under ''usage'' to provide the correct square footage of each unit (not 1,020
square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 18.66 dwelling units per acre.
n) Provide the proposed color of railings. Provide color samples of building and architectural
elements. Colored rendering of building submitted doesn't match front elevation for ground floor
(make consistent).
0) Make name of project consistent (elevations refer to Bell(a) Aqua Villas versus Bell(e) Aqua
Villas). . Also, since 116-120 Brightwater is referred to as "Belle Aqua Villas II," suggest
amending name to "Belle Aqua Villas I" so as to not confuse.
Development Review Conunittee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 17
p) On the Preliminary Plat Sheet C1.IA, provide the existing legal description of the subject
property.
q) Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet C1.1 and Sheet C3.1 to indicate the proposed side setback
to pavement (believed to be five feet).
r) The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing dock and three boat slips. Site inspection
reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these existing boats be removed? By when?
Please address existing versus proposed circumstances with the dock/slips.
s) The narrative for General Applicability Criteria #1 (on page 1 of narrative) states that "The
proposed side setback reductions are less intrusive than that of the existing motel use." This is
partially true, from a "ground plane" standpoint. These existing setbacks are qualified from the
standpoint that the motel is one-story in height. The proposed building (at the proposed reduced
setback) is overwhelming due to the proposed bulk of the building at four stories. Revise
narrative to speak to the existing versus proposed character when relating to setback reductions
and character of the site generally (existing versus proposed).
t) Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway configurations, proposed
setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for meaningful landscaping, much less
making it "tropica1." There is no landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building due to
proposed site characteristics. Revise comments and/or address proposed conditions in narrative
under all appropriate criteria.
u) Proposed development appears to be extensive and excessive for this size of property.
v) The request is to reduce the side setbacks to 3.8 feet to building and 5 feet to pavement. There is
no landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building to mitigate the effects of the bulk of
the proposed building due to the reduced setback. Staff may not support the reductions requested
without the provision of mitigation to minimize or reduce the bulk issue. Advise/revise.
w) Comment: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided through garage
parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even temporarily) outside the garage
within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with these proposed townhomes. Different
than single-family detached dwellings where on-street parking by guests is possible, the site
design of these attached dwellings (townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street
parking by guests unless driveways are blocked.
x) Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet. Provide
justification as part of narrative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-to-four stories
over parking).
y) Revise the survey to include the base flood elevation. Also include such information on Sheet
CU.
z) Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This site is
indicated at 1,207 square feet, yet the project at 116 Brightwater Drive (which is extremely
similar) is indicated at 1,439 square feet, or smaller by 232 square feet. One or both projects
appear wrong. Revise.
aa) Underground all utilities (private and right-of-way).
bb) Address/revise above prior to scheduling for CDB.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments.
7. Land Resources:
a) No comments.
8. Fire:
a) All fire sprinkler work to be done as per NFPA-13 for Ordinary Hazard Group 1 in garage and
NFPA-13R for the residential living area, by licensed fire sprinkler contractor with separate
permit and shop drawings (before building permit).
b) PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL FLOW AND TAMPER
SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (before
building permit).
c) PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON SHEET
C6.1 (before CDB).
d) All fire alarm work to be done as per NFPA-72 by licensed fire alarm contractor with separate
permit and shop drawings (before building permit).
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 18
e) Code summary needs to reflect adherence with the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2001 Edition
(before building pennit).
f) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any pennits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt tolerant plant species for ponds.
10. Community Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapine:
a) The area on the south side of the building needs some landscape treatments. It appears there are
areas between the units / plunge pools that would allow for some Fakahatchee grass with a Queen
palm or other palm centered in each location.
b) On the sides of the building starting about halfway back a Podocarpus hedge could be installed
with some hibiscus for added color.
c) At the southern comers of the building the same treatment of plantings as listed in #1 could be
used, this would total 4 palms accross the back of the building breaking up the facade a little. The
Queen palms would give a nice soft look.
d) Revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
12. Harbor Master
a) There are no problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing
docks will be retained. There are no navigation concerns in their existing configuration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon.
May need to be rescheduled for second DRC Review.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 19
I
2:10 p.m.
Case: FLD2003-07032/PLT2003-00006 - 116-120 Brightwater Drive - Belle Aqua Villas II
Owners: Gary and Mary A. Jernigan.
Applicant: Anthony Menna.
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ email: nestecM7)mindspring.com).
Location: 0.34 acres on the north side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 300 feet east of Hamden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with reductions of the side (east)
setbacks from 10 feet to 5.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement), reductions of the
side (west) setbacks from 10 feet to 6.2 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 9.5 feet (to pavement),
reductions of the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 16.2 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 11.9 feet (to
pools) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to boardwalk) and with an increase of building height from 35 feet to
40.33 feet, and to permit parking that is designed to back into the public right-of-way, as part of a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining four
existing boat slips and two docks for sole use by the property owners) and Preliminary Plat approval for six
lots.
Proposed Use: Six attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Mark Parry, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Recreation Facility Impact Fees are due for each new unit prior to issuance of building permit or
plat whichever occurs fIrst. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1 residential unit. Based on 12 existing
hotel/motel guestrooms and 6 proposed residential units, $600 due.
2. Stormwater:
a) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5 (before building permit).
b) Provide additional lot grading details showing swales and inverts conveying runoff to pond at rear
of site (before CDB).
c) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds (before CDB).
d) Show inverts of pond and side slopes on plan view (before CDB).
3. Traffic En!!ineerin!!:
a) Dimensions for all driveways must be shown (i.e. width and length).
b) No structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty
inches (30") above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's
Connnunity Development Code, Section 3-904).
c) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
d) TIF to be determined and paid prior to e.O.
4. General En!!ineerin!!:
a) Need to show location of trash room (included in Note 1 on Sheet 3.1) or amend Note 1.
b) A 6lxl" tee for the domestic water meter set is not required. The City will tap the water main and
the meter will be fIeld located. All applicable fees to be paid by the applicant (before CDB).
c) DIP pipe required from the 6" tap to one joint on the service side of the DCV A.
d) Need to set a fIre hydrant within 40-feet of the new FDC (before CDB).
e) Need to set a second fIre hydrant for fIre protection or show existing one within 500 feet.
f) Need to observe ten-foot separation between the proposed water and sanitary sewer lines.
g) Revise prior to CDB.
PL T2003-00006
h) Need cover sheet for plat (Dedication, Legal Description, Surveyors Cert., etc.)
i) Suggest that lot lines be squared off at the rear of the property.
j) Show aU lot line dimensions, bearings, etc.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 20
k) Revise h-j prior to Final Plat submittal.
5. Plannine::
a) The garages are proposed at an elevation of 8.0, with right outside the garage at elevation 7.9.
With existing elevations at 4.9 on the west side and 5.05 on the east side, and proposed elevation
changes from 5.5 to 5.7 at the front property line going to 7.9 at the building, this means on the
east and west sides there is over a two-foot grade differential. Are the edges of the driveways on
the east and west sides retaining walls? Provide cross sections at these locations.
b) Concerned with the slope of the driveways, as the eastern driveway grade differential is 2.2 feet
between the front property line and the front of the garage and a 2.4 feet grade differential on the
west side. That is a relatively steep slope from that generally constructed.
c) General conunent regarding Sheet C6.1 - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. If not
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
d) Provide a cross-section of existing and proposed conditions on the side of the building (east or
west).
e) Since this development is being subdivided/resubdivided, Section 3-1908.A states that "The city
may require that existing aboveground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way be relocated
and/or placed underground when the property which the utilities serve is redeveloped." Also
noted is Section 3-911, that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground. Address on Sheets C2.1 and C5.1.
f) Waterfront visibility triangles shown are not compliant with Code provisions. The triangle is a 45
degree angle formed by measuring 10 feet back from the property line on the water and along the
side property line. Revise and show on Sheets C3.1 and L 1.1.
g) Provide a cross section through the pool area to explain the change in elevation from livable area
to ground elevation. Ensure and show compliance with all other regulations, including waterfront
visibility triangles and pool safety enclosures.
h) Building Code requires an 18-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
i) Revise Sheet C1.1 for proposed rear setback, as a zero setback to the boardwalk is proposed and
discussed in the narrative. Also indicate proposed rear setback to building of 16.2 feet. Revise
proposed side (east) setback from 6.2-8.3 to 5.2-8.3 feet. Revise proposed side (west) setback
from 5.0-8.2 to 6.2-8.2 feet.
j) Dimension building on Sheet C3.1 and on Sheets E-1 and E-2. Unclear where rear wall of
building is located. Provide sufficient detail.
k) Show on Sheet ELEV the proposed building height (top of highest flat roof) from the required
FFE (base flood elevation). Revise ground floor elevation to 11.0 feet.
1) Greater articulation of the side elevations for the building shown on Sheet ELEV is necessary.
There are large expanses of blank, stuccoed wall that is not proposed to be muted by any
landscaping or architectural features. Great time and effort was spent on the front and rear
elevations, such as multi-paned, arched windows, brackets, dentils as part of the cornice, molding
underneath windows, arched parapets, arched raised portions of wall, quoins and like architectural
elements. Architectural elements on side elevations should be consistent with and complement
front and rear elevations. Concern: Elevations provided by Douglas W. Lowe, P.E. look
extremely similar to those provided for project at 125 Brightwater Drive, provided by Donoghue
Wood & Associates Inc. Architects. Building plans aren't copyrighted? Advise.
m) Revise Sheet C1.1 under "usage" to provide the correct square footage of each unit (not 1,020
square feet) and revise "proposed density" to 17.7 dwelling units per acre.
n) Provide the proposed color of all building and architectural elements. Provide color samples.
Provide color rendering of building.
0) On the Preliminary Plat Sheet CLlA, provide the existing legal description of the subject
property .
p) Revise Exhibit "A" (narrative), Sheet CLl and Sheet C3.1 to indicate the proposed side setback
to pavement (believed to be 9.5 feet). Revise narrative to ensure proposed setbacks discussed
match the site plan submitted.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 21
i
II
q) The narrative refers to the retaining of the existing docks, but doesn't mention the number of
existing slips. Site inspection reveals there are existing boats in these slips. Will these existing
boats be removed? By when? Please address existing versus proposed circumstances with the
dock/slips.
r) The narrative should address the existing setbacks and scale/bulk of the existing development (at
one-story) in contrast to the proposed attached dwellings and its scale and bulk (at essentially four
stories), as well as its context in relation to adjacent development (existing or proposed) and that
along Brightwater Drive.
s) Proposed development appears to be extensive and excessive for this size of property.
t) The request is to reduce the side setbacks to 5.2 and 6.2 feet (east and west) to building and 9.5
feet to pavement. There is no landscaping proposed on the side (except hedge) or rear of the
building to mitigate the effects of the bulk of the proposed building due to the reduced setback.
Staff may not support the reductions requested without the provision of mitigation to minimize or
reduce the bulk issue. Advise/revise.
u) Comment: Due to the bulk of the proposed building, the proposed driveway configurations,
proposed setbacks and proposed utilities there is very little room for meaningful landscaping.
There is little landscaping proposed on the side or rear of the building due to proposed site
characteristics (only a hedge proposed along sides).
v) Comment: While it is noted that more than the required parking is being provided through garage
parking, generally single-family dwellings have cars parked (even temporarily) outside the garage
within the driveway. This will, most likely, be true with these proposed townhomes. Different
than single-family detached dwellings where on-street parking by guests is possible, the site
design of these attached dwellings (townhomes) with individual driveways will preclude on-street
parking by guests unless driveways are blocked.
w) Revise the narrative to include as part of the request a height increase above 35 feet. Provide
justification as part of narrative (Beach by Design provides for townhomes two-to-four stories
over parking). Revise Sheet C1.1 to indicate real proposed height (above base flood elevation of
11.0 feet).
x) Recheck square footage number provided for proposed paved vehicular use area. This site is
indicated at 1,439 square feet, yet the project at 125 Brightwater Drive (which is extremely
similar) is indicated at 1,207 square feet, or larger by 232 square feet. One or both projects
appear wrong. Revise.
y) Provide on Sheet C1.1 the proposed and required parking lot interior landscaping (square footage
and percentage of the paved vehicular use area).
z) Land area is too light to adequately locate the subject "project site" on the location map on Sheet
C 1.1. Either darken or provide location map similar to that for 125 Brightwater Drive.
aa) Indicate on Sheet L1.1 what is proposed for landscaping within the right-of-way between the
sidewalk and curb.
bb) Underground utilities (private and right-of-way).
cc) Address/revise above prior to scheduling for CDB.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No comments.
7. Land Resources:
a) Need a tree survey all palms 10' clear trunk or greater on the property and within 25' on adjacent
properties, prior to building permit.
8. Fire:
a) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR BOAT SLIPS ON
SHEET C6.2 (BEFORE CDB).
b) ALL FIRE SPRINKLER WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-13 FOR ORDINARY HAZARD
GROUP1 IN THE GARAGE AREA AND NFPA-13R FOR THE RESIDENTIAL LIVING
AREA. ALL WORK TO BE BY A LICENSED FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR WITH
SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT).
c) CODE SUMMARY INFORMATION NEEDS TO REFLECT ADHERENCE WITH THE
FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2001 EDITION (BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT).
d) PROVIDE CENTRAL STATION MONITORING FOR ALL WATER FLOW AND TAMPER
SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM (BEFORE
BUILDING PERMIT).
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 22
e) ALL FIRE ALARM WORK TO BE DONE AS PER NFPA-72 BY A STATE LICENSED
CONTRACTOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS (BEFORE BUILDING
PERMIT).
f) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt tolerant plant species for ponds. Ponds will be inundated twice daily by tidal
fluctuations.
10. Community Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapinl!:
a) Shift landscaping on sides of building to be along the wall.
b) Add a few palms on sides of building.
c) On rear of building there seems to be room for some plants in the areas between walkways to
boardwalk.
12. Harbor Master:
a) No problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing docks will
be retained. They are not a navigation concern in their existing configuration.
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon.
May need to be rescheduled for review by DRC.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 23
2:50 p.m.
Case: FLD2003-06027/TDR2003-06003 - 205,209 and 214 Brightwater Drive - Brightwater Pointe
Owners: Larry L. and Barbara S. Miller.
Applicant: Brightwater Pointe, LLC (Roland Rogers).
Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, #930,
Clearwater, FL 33755; work: 727-443-2869/ fax: 727-446-8036/ email: nestech(a)mindspring.com).
Location: 0.34 acres on the south side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 300 feet east of Harnden Drive.
Atlas Page: 276A.
Zoning: T, Tourist District.
Request: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction of the front (west)
setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), reduction of the side (west) setback from 10 feet to five feet
(to pavement), reduction of the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to pavement) and reductions
of the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to 18 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck),
with an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet and to permit parking that is designed to back
into the public right-of-way, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions
of Section 2-803.C (retaining seven existing boat slips and four existing docks for sole use by the property
owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for three dwelling units, under the provisions of Section 4-
1403.
Proposed Use: Twenty (20) attached dwellings.
Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (Pres. David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Ave.,
Clearwater, FL 33767 - phone 727-446-5801).
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Wayne Wells, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space, Recreation Land and Recreation Facility impact fees are due prior to issuance of
building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. 4 hotel/motel guestrooms = 1
residential unit. If 16 existing hotel/motel guestrooms, 4 residential units will be credited and the
assessment will be based on 16 new residential units. Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817.
2. Stormwater:
a) No vertical walls accepted on water quality treatment ponds (before CDB).
b) The southern pond has no outfall or subdrain. How will it perc through subdrain in northern pond
(before building permit)?
c) Provide soil boring to verify seasonal high water or use elevation 2.5 (before building permit).
3. Traffic Ene:ineerine::
a) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles on the landscaping site plans. No structures or landscaping
may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between thirty inches (30") above grade and
eight feet (8') above grade within the sight distance triangle. (City's Community Development
Code, Section 3-904).
b) Add do not enter signs per MUTCD at the egress driveway.
c) Add proper signage and pavement markings to inform the driver the direction of traffic flow for
one-way direction.
d) All regular parking spaces must meet the City's minimum dimensions for a 90 degree parking stall
and maintain a 24' drive aisle without any intrusions.
e) Handicap parking stalls and handicapped aisles must meet the City's minimum dimensions without
any intrusions (i.e. columns).
f) Show on the site plan current City standard Handicap parking stall and "sign" details i.e. $255.
g) Is the radius of garage entrance and exit adequate for vehicles? Show vehicles entering and
exiting garage at it's radius.
h) Will this be a gated condominium? If so, show on the site plan the gate and console. How will this
gate be operated?
i) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
j) TIF to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
4. General Ene:ineerine::
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 24
a) Ductile Iron pipe must be used for fire hydrant line (Contract Specifications and Standards,
Article 41.03.C.3) and for one joint on service side of new DCV A.
b) Define where existing water line and new water main extension are located within the ROW of
Brightwater Drive. Existing and proposed pipelines are shown using the same line symbol and
line weight. Use different line weights so that existing and proposed lines can be differentiated.
c) 6"x6" tee w/6"x2" reducer not required for the domestic water line. City will tap the water main to
set the meter. All applicable fees to paid by the applicant.
d) Need to core existing manhole for sanitary sewer connection.
e) Need to relocate the new sanitary manhole to within the ROW of Brightwater Drive.
f) What are the new 6" sanitary line and clean out going to serve? Pool, pump, etc. cannot be
connected to the sanitary system.
g) Are these condominiums? If so, plat must be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit.
h) Address prior to scheduling for CDB.
5. Plannin2:
a) The "Description of Request" and all appropriate criteria, as part of Exhibit "A," must include
and address an increase of building height from 35 feet to 54 feet (or whatever the proposed
height is to be - see also Comment "v" below) and a reduction of the rear (east) setback from 20
feet to 18 feet (to building).
b) The application is requesting the approval to permit parking that is designed to back into the
public right-of-way. Two of these spaces are less than the required 19 feet stall length, thereby
having a portion of the spaces within the right-of-way, which is no different than some existing
conditions along Brightwater Drive and not allowed by Code.
c) Based on the site design on Sheet C3.1, it is unclear why the 4'x 8' shed in the northeast comer of
the property is not being removed. Revise Sheet C2.1 or C3.1 appropriately.
d) Assuming the submitted drawings are drawn to scale, the inside dimension of the parking portion
of the building scales to only 61 feet across, providing for two 18-foot long spaces (even though
dimensioned at 19-foot lengths) with a 24-foot wide drive aisle. Code requires parking spaces to
be 19 feet in length.
e) Due to the building design, parking spaces 14 and 15, assuming they meet the required 19-foot
space length, do not have the required 24 feet drive aisle width (stall length and drive aisle scale
to 41 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
f) Parking spaces 19 and 30 are not provided with the required 24 feet drive aisle (stall length and
drive aisle scale to 35 feet, rather than the required 43 feet).
g) The visibility triangles on the inside of the driveways are drawn incorrectly. The one leg of the
triangle is along the front property line (right-of-way line), not perpendicular to the edge of the
driveway. Revise. This should eliminate the encroachment of the building into the visibility
triangles.
h) From a building wall opening standpoint, the site plan is unclear as to what portions of the
building at ground level are open versus solid. Revising the site plan on at least Sheet C3.1 and
then on building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to indicate solid walls/columns versus open
areas with building above would be helpful in understanding the relationship of the parking
garage area to the outside areas and the building elevations.
i) Likewise with the comment above, revising the building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to
indicate what portions of the walls at ground level are open versus solid would assist in
understanding the architecture of the building in relationship to the parking garage and
pedestrian/vehicular circulation. Color renderings would also assist with understanding this
relationship.
j) It is unclear the purpose of the new ramp adjacent to the building north of the pool. If for
handicap access to the pool, show the width of the sidewalk, the designated pathway to it and, due
to the site plan being unclear as to the location of building openings versus solid walls, and a
doorway/building opening to allow handicap passage from the parking area to the outside.
k) Since east/southeast side of the building is irregular in shape, provide dimensions to all points of
the east/southeast side of the building (not just the two locations provided) to ensure that all
points of the building are at the proposed 18-foot setback.
1) Like Comment #k above, provide a dimension from the west and north property lines to the other
closest point of the building and provide a dimension from the front property line to the closest
building point on the southwest side and the middle of the building (at dumpster staging area).
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 25
m) Proposed 6" DCV A on Sheet C5.l shown to be located, and conflicting with, a guest parking
space. Revise.
n) With existing docks being re-used for the proposed condominiums, unclear how they will be
accessed (sidewalk?). Advise/show.
0) General comment regarding Sheet C6.l - ensure all details are being utilized in site design. If not
used, remove or "X" out the detail. Otherwise, revise details to match proposed site design.
p) Unclear why 6" vertical curbing is being used in parking garage area adjacent to parking spaces,
as there is no adjacent landscape area being protected. Revise/advise.
q) Visibility triangles must also be shown adjacent to parking that is backing out into the Brightwater
Drive right-of-way. Show visibility triangles on Sheets C3.l and LA-I. Comply with visibility
triangle requirements.
r) Show waterfront visibility triangles at the northeast and southwest comers of the property on
Sheets C3.l and LA-I.
s) Based on the overall building dimension for the building northeast to southwest stated on Sheet
A2 of 219'-3 \12", revise Sheets C3.l, C4.l, C5.l and LA-l to show the building with another
angle at the northeast and southwest comers of the building, rather than the comers shown.
t) Since color renderings were not provided of the building elevations, provide greater specificity on
the building elevations on Sheets A5 and A6 to indicate intended color scheme, including
columns, pilasters, railings, window/door frames, facia/trim, banding, etc.
u) Front building elevations on Sheet A5 indicate that most windows (and French doors) on that
elevation will be multi-paned. Unclear why all windows aren't similarly detailed, including side
and rear elevations.
v) By architectural elevations, mansard roofs are proposed around the edges of the building, which
will have a main, flat roof. The height of 54 feet has been provided to this roof slab. Code limits
parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs to a maximum of 30 inches above the flat
roof. The proposed mansards (parapet walls) are designed at approximately 6'-8" above the main
roof slab. This additional height will need to be included as part of the request, with justification
for the increase in height. Additionally, Code allows elevator equipment rooms and like
equipment enclosures to project no more than 16 feet higher than, in this case, the main roof slab.
The application is not clear where mechanical equipment, such as air condenser units, are
proposed to be located. Concerned that the three storage rooms indicated on the roof plan are an
additional floor and do not meet the provisions of the Code. Beach by Design for this Small
Motel District also restricts residential uses to two to four stories over ground-level parking. This
appears to be, with these storage rooms, to be five stories over ground-level parking, which would
then not be in compliance with Beach by Design. Further, the elevator shafts exceed the 16 feet
Code limitation (roof shown to be an approximate additional five feet). Should you desire to
retain the storage rooms, parapets/mansard and other features described, these also must be
included as part of the request, with the justification for such. Staff may not be supportive of
these height increases (not in compliance with Beach by Design). Make clear proposed heights
(from base flood elevation) on elevations and in application.
w) Building Code requires an l8-foot setback for structures from the seawall. Contact the
Development Services Department for allowable reductions and procedures.
x) Section 3-911 states that "For development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities
including individual distribution lines shall be underground unless such undergrounding is not
practicable." Existing development along Brightwater Drive is served by aboveground utilities.
With the transformation of Brightwater Drive, these aboveground utilities need to be placed
underground (private and right-of-way). Address on Sheets C2.l and C5.I.
y) Address/revise prior to scheduling for CDB.
6. Solid Waste:
a) Reconfigure dumpster staging area where guest parking is being eliminated.
7. Land Resources:
a) Tree survey is incomplete for lot 29, show trees on site and landscape plans.
b) Revisetree replacement cales ou landscape plan if trees on lot 29 are to be removed.
c) Revise/provide prior to scheduling for CDB.
8. ~
Development Review Connnittee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 26
a) AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER NFPA-13 BY
A STATE LICENSED CONTRACTOR WITH SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DWGS
(before Building Construction Permit).
b) ALL BUILDING AND SITE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO ALL APPLICABLE
LOCAL CODES AND ORDINACES AND COMPLY WITH THE 2001 EDITION OF THE
FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE (before Building Construction Permit).
c) NO UNDERGROUND FIRE PROTECTION PIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED
UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING (before CDB).
d) SHOW DETAIL FOR 4" INCH WET STANDPIPE FOR THE REAR DOCKS AND BOAT
SLIPS, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION AND FIRE HYDRANT ON SHEET C5.1
(before CDB).
e) That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits.
9. Environmental:
a) Recommend salt-tolerant species for ponds.
10. Community Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapine::
a) Add a few Washingtonia or Sabal palms and underplanting of shrubs on ends of building between
properties. Leave 36" minimum open space for lawn equipment access.
b) The ramp on the back of the building leading to the pool has plants shown on it in the landscape
plan.
c) The area by the entrances has nothing indicated below the palms; since this area is not indicated
as sod please clarify what is being proposed there.
d) Prior to CDB.
12. Harbor Master:
a) No problems or concerns from the navigation viewpoint due to the fact that the existing docks will
be retained. They are not a navigation concern in their existing configuration.
NOTES:
Need to be rescheduled for another DRC Meeting.
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 27
In
3:30 p.m.
Case: PL T2003-00005 - 2492 Belleair Road.
Owner/Applicant: Roger Broderick.
Representative: Samer Alghafari, Ghafari Associates, Inc. (5373 Ehrlich Road, Suite 203, Tampa, FL
33625; work: 813-228-6865/ fax: 813-228-6812).
Location: 1.77 acres on the north side of Belleair Road, approximately 1200 feet west of US Highway 19
(adjacent to the west side of the Florida Power R.O.W.).
Atlas Page: 3l7B.
Zoning: MDR, Medium Density Residential District.
Request: Preliminary Plat approval for 10 detached dwelling lots, under the provisions of Section 4-702
through 4-704.
Proposed Use: Ten detached dwelling lots (Belleair Commons Subdivision).
Neighborhood Association:
Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Senior Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Frank Gerlock, Wayne Wells, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) Open Space/Recreation Impact Fees are due prior to city approval and signature of the [mal
or record plat per Chapter 54 of the Code of Ordinances. These impact fees will need to be
recalculated due to the change in units from 13 to 10. Contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817.
2. Stormwater:
a) Please show typical house pad including fInished floor, paved area and lot grading.
b) Provide calculations that demonstrate site will meet City stormwater retention and water
quality treatment criteria.
c) Provide 50' of adjacent topography to demonstrate that bordering properties will not be
adversely affected.
d) Show stormwater collection system and stormwater pond outfall location.
e) Provide draw down calculations with verifIed (soil boring) seasonal high water elevation.
f) Comments need to be addressed before plat is approved.
3. Traffic Ene:ineerine::
a) Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the access.(Section 3-904, The City of Clearwater
Community Development Code Manual).
b) Private Road must be 24 feet wide from the edge of pavement to the edge of pavement.
c) Private Road must have a 4-foot wide sidewalk on both sides of the road and link to existing
sidewalk along Belleair road. (Section 3-1907, City of Clearwater Community Development
Code Manual).
d) Applicant should be made aware of future proposed multi-use trail (aka: Progress Energy) to
be located along the Florida Power right-of-way east of the property.
e) State on the site plan whether proposed residential development is to be gated or not.
f) Above to be addressed prior to DO.
g) Need County permit for work along County right-of-way (Belleair Road) prior to permitting.
h) Traffic Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O.
4. General Ene:ineerinl!:
a) Need a cover sheet for the plat (dedication, surveyors certifIcation, etc.).
b) Lot lines should be extended to the centerlines of the proposed roads.
c) The proposed two-way road does not appear wide enough to provide for fIre/sanitation
access.
d) Complete review of the plat is not possible without a site plan (storm drainage, utilities,
grading, etc.) for the proposed development.
5. Plannine::
a) Based on General Engineering comment to place lot lines in the centerline of the proposed
road, this would require Flexible Development approval (FLD) through the public hearing
process to the Community Development Board (CDB), as the setback to pavement would be
zero. (Note: Pavement is a structure according to the City of Clearwater Community
Development Review Connnittee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 28
Development Code [Code].) This process would require all the information other
departments are asking for.
b) Existing driveways no longer to be used must be removed.
c) Show all proposed easements.
d) Based on comments in "a" above, front setback of 25 feet is measured from front property
line. However, it is highly recommended to have 20 feet from the edge of any sidewalk along
the private street to the front of the garage (most people "park" outside of garage, and Code
does not allow vehicles to overhang the sidewalk).
e) Identify what the longer dashed line close to the west property line is.
f) Dimension the setbacks shown on the lots (may be shown as typical where such applies).
g) Lots 4 and 7 also have front setback requirements along the north side of the lot adjacent to
the private street and within 25 feet of the property line.
h) Lots 4 and 7 have a rear setback along the east and west sides respectively.
i) Lots 5 and 6 have a rear setback along the north side and east/west sides respectively.
j) Lots 2, 3, 8 and 9 have a rear setback on the east and west sides respectively.
6. Solid Waste:
a) The hammerhead turn around will not work for the type of truck used to service Black Barrel
would like to see a cul-de-sac at the end of the street as the trucks are right side steer and
pickup.
7. Land Resources:
~
8. Fire:
a) A 24-foot wide paved ftre department access roads is required.
b) Show ftre hydrants spaced 500 feet apart for residential.
c) Provide a 28-foot turning radius on hammerhead.
d) Need a Fire Department approved cul-de-sac (95-foot diameter) or hammerhead
9. Environmental:
a) More information is needed in order to review this application for environmental concerns.
No water quality treatment is proposed. The City criteria manual would be helpful to the
applicant for design purposes prior to submitting new plans.
10. Community Response:
a) No comments.
11. Landscapine::
a) No comments.
NOTES:
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14,2003 - Page 29
3:45 p.rn.
Case: ANX2003-07014 - 2179 Bernice Drive.
Owner/Applicant: Charles R. Smiley (727-442-3215).
Location: 0.23-acres located on the south side of Burnice Drive, approximately 220 feet west of Belcher
Road.
Atlas Page: 308B.
Request:
(a) Annexation ofO.23-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from the RL, Residential Low Category (County) to the RL, Residential
Low Category (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from the R3, Single Family Residential District (County) to the LMDR, Low Medium
Density Residential District (City of Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Neighborhood Association(s): None.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Marc Mariano, Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic Ene:ineerine::
a) No Comments
4. General Ene:ineerine::
a)
5. Plannine::
a)
6. Solid Waste:
a) Solid waste service must be turned on at anx.
7. Land Resources:
a)
8. ~
a) No Comments
9. Environmental:
a)
10. Community Response:
a)
11. Landscapin2:
a)
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon for CDB.
Applicants will not be in attendance.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 30
Case: ANX2003-07015 - 910 Berkley Place
Owners/Applicants: Lawrence A. and Susan Walther.
Representative: John Powers, Rainbow Property Management (727-446-9633).
Location: 0.17-acres located at the southwest comer of Berkley Place and Palmetto Street, approximately
600 feet east of Belcher Road.
Atlas Page: 281A.
Request:
(a) Annexation of 0.17-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from the RU, Residential Urban Category (County) to the RU,
Residential Urban Category (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from the R3, Single Family Residential District (County) to the LMDR, Low Medium
Density Residential District (City of Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Neighborhood Association(s): None.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Marc Mariano, Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic Ene:ineerine::
a) No Comments
4. General Ene:ineerine::
a)
5. Plannine::
a)
6. Solid Waste:
a) Solid waste service must be turned on at anx.
7. Land Resources:
a)
8. Fire:
a) No Comments
9. Environmental:
a)
10. Community Response:
a)
11. Landscapine::
a)
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday,
August 18, 2003, no later than Noon for CDB.
Applicants will not be in attendance.
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 31
Case: ANX2003-07016 - 1830 Brentwood Drive
Owner/Applicant: Steve Rainwater (727-443-0372).
Location: 0.24-acres located on the north side of Brentwood Drive, approximately 450 feet east of Keene
Road and 280 feet north of Lakeview Road.
Atlas Page: 308A.
Request:
(a) Annexation ofO.24-acres to the City of Clearwater;
(b) Land Use Plan amendment from the RL, Residential Low Category (County) to the RL, Residential
Low Category (City of Clearwater); and
(c) Rezoning from the R3, Single Family Residential District (County) to the LDR, Low Density
Residential District (City of Clearwater).
Proposed Use: Existing single-family dwelling.
Neighborhood Association(s): None.
Presenter: Marc A. Mariano, Planner.
Attendees included:
City Staff: Marc Mariano, Frank Gerlock, Bryan Berry, Scott Rice, Duanne Anderson, Debbie Richter, and
Tom Glenn
Applicant/Representative:
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Stormwater:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic Em!ineerinl!:
a) No comments
4. General Enl!ineerinl!:
a) Sewer impact ($900.00 and Sewer Assess. $359.72) due prior to issuance of a building permit
(plumbing).
5. Planninl!:
a)
6. Solid Waste:
a) Solid waste service must be turned on at anx.
7. Land Resources:
a)
8. Fire:
a) No Comments
9. Environmental:
a)
10. Community Response:
a)
11. Landscapinl!:
a)
NOTES:
Resubmit 15 collated copies of the revised plans addressing all statements from departments above by Monday, August 18,
2003, no later than Noon for CDB.
Applicants will not be in attendance.
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D B\agendas DRC & CDBIDRC\2003108 August 14, 2003\DRC Action Agenda 08-14-03,doc
Development Review Committee - Action Agenda - Thursday, August 14, 2003 - Page 32
Dittmer. Arden
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Tarapani, Cyndi
Thursday, September 11,20034:41 PM
Dittmer, Arden; Gerlock, Frank
Fierce, Lisa; Phillips, Sue; Owens, Reginald W.; Harriger, Sandy; Dunbar, Kevin E.; Arasteh,
Mahshid
Club More Site
Subject:
I discussed the Club More site at the Strategy Meeting this week. The application is for re-establishment of a
restaurant and bar at 703 Franklin Street and it is a flex standard review (staff approval). As I understand the status
of the case, it is pending until the parking issue is resolved. In the previous approval for this site, the City agreed to
allow parking after 5 pm weekdays and all day weekends in the MSB garage. The current applicant wishes to use
the MSB vacant lot for parking. The applicant proposes improving the lot to provide the parking.
There was a concern raised with the potential tenant of this site as Greenbacks due to the characteristics of their
current business and a reluctance to encourage their continued improper activities. Therefore, it was decided that
ED would talk with the owner re these concerns.
Arden and Frank-please keep this case pending until those discussions are held.
Reg and Ralph-we would apreciate hearing back from you as the discussions progress.
I have added Kevin to this message due to the recent discussions about this site as a possible trail head. If we go
ahead with a parking lot, I think we should consider this site for use as a trail head on the weekends. There are
other site plan concerns regarding trees, stonnwater, etc that need to be addressed if the parking lot is to be allowed.
Any other ideas are welcome. Thanks.
Cyndi Tarapani
Planning Director
(727)562-4547
ctarapan@clearwater-fl.com
1
. .
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
{;( S oro~, DlO?JS"
Case No. \ v
Location: 7 () 3 fr -IV! f:-{( 11
dbLP 6
v_CC
Meeting Date: August 14, 2003
Sr-
rJ 1/'+
-;)! .
b/ Current Use: Vi/fc,4r!r'r' Ch?1 /?J(../ ((czj) /.':) d AJ ,
Ief Active Code Enforce~ent Case eyes:
//
~ Address numbt(ye (no) (vacant land)
~~ . Landscaping{~~) no) '\ /!_~A() fJL ~1
/'V ~QJ-fJp .. ..
/ Overgrown ye (no)
..Ai" Debris (yes)~ /....
?-Inoperative vehic~(s) (yes6J
/Building(s) goo (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
~ Fencing/thone (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
y Paint (good) e (poor) (garish)
~ Grass Parking (yes) ~
"Jlf' Residential Parking Violations (yes@
7' Signag (none) (ok) (not ok) (billboard)
y Parking (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
~umpster (enclosed) (not enclosed)
/Outdoor storage (yesc9
COf!1ments/Status,Report (attac~ an}' per::tinent documents): .'
- He CeLt l3efr.u<<~/7 70 7;> .' 70'!) ...' ~mp-J' I Y\
,
f3ft{) jh4~_
Date:811 {03 Reviewed by: 3heLbrj 73R-61Afv/ Telephone: 5'& (). It l (). g
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 ( t.ff-T