Loading...
FLS02-04-31 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR 5/16/02 DRC MEETING BACKGROUND INFROMA TION: APPLICANT: Mr. & Mrs. David Boos PROPERTY LOCATION: 844 Eldorado A venue REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to increase the permitted height from 30 feet to 32 feet, reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to house) and to seven feet (to staircase) along Eldorado Avenue, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2- 203. APPLICA TION NUMBER: FLS 02-04-31 ZONING: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District EXISTING USE: Single-family residential ADJACENT LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Single-family residential Single-family residential Single-family residential Gulf of Mexico Page 1 . . STAFF ANALYSIS The 0.15-acre site is located on the west side of Eldorado A venue approximately 50 feet south of Gardenia Street. The site contains an existing one-story single-family dwelling. The existing building is located 17 feet from the front (east) property line along Eldorado A venue, three feet from the side (north and south) property lines and 52 feet from the rear (west) property line. The site is located in a stable, residential neighborhood of well-maintained single-family homes. The neighborhood is undergoing redevelopment consisting of the demolition of existing one and two story homes. New homes must meet current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements and are typically two stories. The area is characterized by front setbacks typically less than 15 feet. The application includes the demolition of an existing one-story single-family dwelling and the construction of a two-story single-family dwelling. The house will be located 17 feet from the front (east) property line along Eldorado Avenue and a staircase providing ingress/egress to the house will be seven feet from the front property line. All required building permits would need to be obtained prior to construction. In addition, all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code will need to be met related to seawall setbacks. A. COMPLIANCE WITH MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL STANDARD IN THE LMDR, LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-201.1): STANDARD REQUIRED! EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? DENSITY 1 dwelling unit 1 dwelling unit 1 dwelling Yes unit IMPERVIOUS 0.65 0.42 0.64 Yes SURFACE RATIO Page 2 . . B. FLEXIBILITY STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE LMDR, LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-203): STANDARD REQUIRED! EXISTING PROPOSED IN PERMITTED COMPLIANCE? LOT SIZE N/A 6,600 square feet 6,600 square Yes (minimum) feet LOT WIDTH N/A 60 feet 32 Yes (minimum) HEIGHT N/A 15 feet 30 feet Yes maximum PARKING 2 spaces per unit 2 spaces per unit 2 spaces per Yes SPACES unit minimum FRONT 10 - 25 feet East: 17 feet East: 17 feet (to Yes SETBACK house) seven feet (to staircase) SIDE o - 5 feet North: three feet North: five feet Yes SETBACK South: three feet South: five feet REAR 0- 15 feet West: 52 feet West: 34 feet Yes SETBACK C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE LMDR, LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-203): 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development standards; The house currently has a 17-foot setback along the front (east) property line along Eldorado A venue. The application includes the demolition of an existing one-story, single-family dwelling and the construction of two-story, single-family dwelling. The proposed single-family dwelling will constitute a major improvement over the existing home and will compliment the neighborhood. Many of the existing homes in the neighborhood have front setbacks generally consistent with the setbacks proposed with this application. The proposed side and front setbacks will visually conform to the rest of the neighborhood. Page 3 . . 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The existing value of the property is approximately $661,000. The anticipated value of the property is expected to increase to $1,300,000 after the proposed improvements are completed. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; The existing use of the property is a single-family dwelling. That use will not change with this proposal and is consistent the uses permitted in the Low Medium Density Residential District. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The existing use of the property is a single-family dwelling. That use will not change with this proposal. The surrounding neighborhood is entirely single-family dwellings. The area is characterized by front setbacks typically less than 15 feet. The proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; The proposal is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. The expenditure will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a from and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; The proposal includes the demolition of an existing one-story single-family dwelling and the construction of a two-story single-family dwelling. The reduction in the front (east) setback is consistent with and will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The neighborhood consists of well-maintained, single-family homes. The proposed, two- story, single-family dwelling will benefit the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed setback is consistent with the character neighborhood. Page 4 . . D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The application includes the demolition of an existing one-story single-family dwelling and the construction of a two-story single-family dwelling. The house will be located 17 feet from the front (east) property line along Eldorado Avenue and a staircase providing ingress/egress to the house will be seven feet from the front property line. It will have no impact on density and will be within impervious surface ratio limitations. The immediate area consists of single-family homes. Adjacent homes are located approximately 10 feet from the front (east) setback along Eldorado Avenue. The development will be in harmony with the scale and character of adjacent properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The site is zoned LMDR District and the proposed use will be in compliance with that zoning. The proposed development should not discourage appropriate development and use of adjacent land buildings. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The use will not change with this proposal. The development will not negatively affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The use does not change with this proposal and will have no increased effect on traffic. Page 5 . . 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The application includes the demolition of an existing one-story single-family dwelling and the construction of a two-story single-family dwelling. The house will be located 17 feet from the front (east) property line along Eldorado Avenue and a staircase providing ingress/egress to the house will be seven feet from the front property line. It will have no impact on density and will be within impervious surface ratio limitations. The immediate area consists of single-family homes. Adjacent homes are located approximately 10 feet from the front (east) setback along Eldorado Avenue. Other homes in the neighborhood are typically between five feet and 15 feet from their respective front setbacks. The proposed development is consistent with and will improve the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. There will be no adverse effects generated by the proposed development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the on the application, the proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval, with the maximum development potential and with all applicable standards of the Community Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends APPROV AL of the application for Flexible Development approval to increase the permitted height from 30 feet to 32 feet, reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to house) and to seven feet (to staircase) along Eldorado A venue, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-203 at 844 Eldorado A venue. Basis for approval: 1. The proposal complies with Flexible Development and Residential Infill Project criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions: 1. That the site plan/elevations reflect that any structure in sight triangle, at 30 inches or above, have minimal opaqueness as acceptable to the Traffic Operations Manager, at the time of building permit. Page 6 . . S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\Standard Flei\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Eldorado 844 Boos\Eldorado 844 Report. doc Page 7 . . FLS 02-04-31 844 Eldorado Ave. Date received: 4/25/02 Boos, David M. Agent: Alex Plisko ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR LAND USE: RU Atlas Page #249A Surrounding Properties: North: LMDR/RU South: LMDR/RU East: LMDRlRU p West: OS/R I RIGS ; Clearwater -~ u~ Planning Lt 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, F\orIcIa 33756 Telephone: 727-582-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 c S \ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (sta~in . IS):;--l::)~ ATLAS PAGE#: .9~___ ZONING DISTRICT: M1:> LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ~ ~ ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ~ NORTH~' / \.J SOUTH: / WEST: / EAST: / \;.,,) Q SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Q SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plana Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE S 100.00 FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDRorLMDROIlly) Residential InfiB Project (Revised 9/19/01) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT.... A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: DAVID M. & KATHY M. BOOS 2891 SWEETGUM WAY S.. CLEARWATER. FL 33761 PHONE NUMBER: 727-791-4772 FAX NUMBER: 727-791-4865 CELLULAR NUMBER: 727-460-6375 PROPERTY OWNER(S): DAVID M. & KATHY M. BOOS (Must include ALL owners) MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: ALEX PLlSKO. PLlSKO ARCHITECTURE. PA 800 DREW STREET. CLEARWATER. FL 33755 AGENT NAME: 727-442-7200 FAX NUMBER: 727-447-6914 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS: 844 ELDORADO A VENUE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 4. BLOCK 6. MAP OR PLAT ENTITLED MANDALA Y PARCEL NUMBER: OS/29/15/54666/006 0040 PARCEL SIZE: .15 ACRES - 6.600 SF PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (Number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): 1. 17'-6" Front Setback in lieu of 25'-0" (Include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 2. 8'-0" setback for stairs in lieu of 3'-0" into front setback 3. Additional 2'-0" in heiaht to allow 32'-0" heiaht in lieu of 30'-0" DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO L (If yes, attach . copy of the applicable documents C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE OR DEED TO THE PROPERTY D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed new residence is typical to other residences that have been redeveloped on Eldorado Avenue. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed new residence will not hinder or discourage the redevelopment of either the north or south neighbor and it will increase values on Eldorado Avenue. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood or the proposed use. The new residence will replace an existing residence and will not affect the health or safety of neighboring residences. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed new residence will accommodate space for 3 cars that will not impact the public sidewalk. The existing residence creates parking over sidewalk. The new residence will not increase traffic. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The new residence is consistent with the redevelopment of single family residences on Eldorado Avenue. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed single family residence will enhance the architectural character of the neighborhood and will not adversely impact the surrounding single family residences. C :\! SD\Misc\Boos-application-423. wpd Page 2 of6 (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The proposal includes the development of a single-family residence. The site is SO' x 110' with 1S' of beach west of seawall leaving a buildable site depth of 94'-0". It would be impractical to improve the site without seeking relief from the set backs in the LMDR District. The structure will encroach into the front setback by 7'..fj" leaving a 17'..fj" setback. The front entrance stairs are proposed to project 7'-0" beyond the requested 17'-S" setback in lieu of the allowable 3'-0", which is due to the flood zone requirements. The average height of the site is 7.5' requiring the proposed first floor of the residence to be raised 7.0' above existing grade. The site is in an AE-12 zone with an additional 2.5 foot freeboard requirement established by the County raising the flood elevation to 14.5'. In order to park vehicles under the residence the house must be raised another four feet which necessitates the request for the height to be increased by 2 feet to allow a 32 feet height in lieu of 30 feet. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Included the existing value of the site and the proposed value ofthe site with the improvements.) The location of the house will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The current assessed value of the property is $661,000. The estimated assessed value after the new construction is expected to be $1,300,000. The improvements proposed for this site are in keeping with the redevelopment of the area. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The LMDR District permits single-family dwellings. The proposal meets that criterion. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The surrounding uses are detached dwellings and this proposal will be compatible with adjacent land uses. The reduced front yard setback is consistent and compatible with neighboring sites. The additional height is similar to the residence under construction at 800 Eldorado Avenue. Refer to attached photographs of existing Eldorado conditions. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The applicant is proposing to construct a structure similar in size, scale and quality to surrounding houses. The economic and aesthetic value of the house is expected to increase with the proposed improvements what will compliment the neighborhood. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed structure will be of a similar high quality as surrounding houses. The proposed house will be three-stories with a first floor three-car garage. The effect of the design will be increased curb appeal. Neighboring property owners may be positively influenced to maintain their existing high standards of maintenance. The proposed house is compatible with and will enhance the neighborhood. The community character of the immediate vicinity and of Clearwater as a whole will be enhanced through aesthetics and increased property values. The proposal demonstrates continued confidence of the homeowners to reinvest funds on the beach. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The utilization of the flexible development standards will result in more attractive house and property and a consistent streetscape. The new development will result in increase property values and enhanced community character. The proposed house will be similar in size scale and setback to existing structures in the area. C :\!SD\Misc\Boos-application-423. wpd Page 3 ofS . . F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies; o COpy OF RECORDED PLAT. as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT. as required; o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY. o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site. by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines.) o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas. such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all refuse collection facilities and all required screening (min. 10'x12' clear space); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite ard offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. o SITE DATA TABLE for existing. required. and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of dwelling units proposed; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) and color rendering if possible; Q FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline; Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; InteliDt landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11) (color rendering if possible); o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project. ~ o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yo X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C) o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS _ r- sr;;n to Ind subscribed before me this s2..;;L. day of 012.1 ,A.D. 20 0 :;L. to me and/or by , who is -l..ers~ lsDown has produced DLt:1 P4,;Jo 000 4. ~-O as identification. vLtI /0 -tr; -If}!?' Signature of property owner or representative Notary pu My comm . COMMl6SlON, CC992490 . EXPIIES JAN 08 2005 8ONDl!D HOUatl ~t<<nAI\' Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater Apr 22 02 10:37a 9kO Architect 7.76914 p.2 M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: David M. & Kathy M. Boos (Names of all property owners) 1. That (I amlwe are) the ownet(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 844 Eldorado Avenue, Clearwater Lot 4, Block 6 - Mandalay City of Clearwater 2. That this property constitutes the property for which. request for a: (desalbe request) 1. 17'-6" Front Sptbad in lieu of 251-011 2. 8'-0" Setback for stairs in lieu of 31-0" into front.setback 3. Additional 2f-O" in height to allow 32'-0" height ;n lieu of 301-0" 3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (doesldo) appoint: A 1 ex PH s ko. Pl i s ko Arch; tecture. P. A. 800 Drew Street, Clearwater. FL 727-442-7200 as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. Thst this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property, 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application 8nd the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the propertY described in this application; 6. That (I/We), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregOlng~rue8" \ Prope -COUNTY OF PiNatAS STATE OF FLORIDA, ~~ . . day of haYing been first duly sworn IIMS2II=DS\Ranning OepattmentlApplicatlon Forms\developm.,t reviBw\$ingle famillrNidential inf/fllpp/ication 2001.doc ,"Iif.~:'?""... SHIRLEY A. MORRIS ~r ~..\ MY COMMISSION # CC 860152 . : EXPIRES: Augus12, 2003 Bonded Thru Western SurlIIy Company My Commission Expires: Page 6 of 6 - Aexibre Standard Development Application Single Family ResidentiallnfiJI Project- City of Clearwater /' 0~VO-" "'\2. I V S-;I . . . Knkl.HN I. !iI. l.iL!jl<lk1 !1!~,':, I!! I.';, F'WEU.Nl CUUNrV, FIOK/IDA -"--~"--"-""'-'_'~'_''''~~''''''___n' ._...._ _.............. ".. ..... PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: J~ Paul Raymond, Esquire Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen 625 Court Street, Suite 200 Post Office Box 1669 (33757) Clearwater, .Florida 33756 4C14il!jl~ 09-01')000 B:Oli:~I~j 51 HUH) lions 0000000000 In: [lK: ~lCUF~D Wi) OO~) PAGES DOC ShiMP - DP21'~ fjr[;: u.t". ~ .i. I {": 4',',,' .j dr hi '\',';;-:;;' :;2....-- I\("...'\~. '''\, ;,,1 I l',2C. ' 1F\21a . W 0,. 1t.IT .__ r "~.. .':' ___ --.- WARRANTY DEED TOIAL: P CHECK AMf. TENDERED: CHANGE: BY _~_ DEPUTY CLERK 00-287::321 SPT- 1-2000 8 :O::3,M PINELLAS CO 8K 110::37 PQ 228::3 1 111m 11m 1111111111 Iml 11111 11111 1111111111111 ~;~:\~.' t~ i (I ,u' .,' '. .~:j,lAtI:,,\,i $.OU I'i' ! ~.: .....n.. ...,,-- THIS INDENTURE made this ~ day of ,f\Jq\l~}. , 2000, by and i'i:.:.._.__. between CONSTANCE M. PARISE, Trustee u/a/d 1/22/92 not individually Fi!,::.\l,__.~ r6"i)'\-6~to but as Trustee with full power and authority either to protect, ,~K P}d. __-~ :: .'.' n' ..."__ conserve and to sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise dispose of the real property described herein of the County of Pinellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the First Part, whose mailing address is 2424 Summerwood Ct., Dunedin, FL 34698-2253, and DAVID M. BOOS and KATHY M. BOOS, husband and wife, of the County of Pinellas, in the State of Florida, Party of the Second Part, whose mailing address is 2891 Sweetgum Way South, Clearwater, FL 33761. WIT N E SSE T H: That the said Party of the First Part, for and in consider- ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second Part, its heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit: Lot 4, Block 6, MANDALAY SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, Page 32, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to 2000 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva- tions and easements of record. Parcel 1.0. No. OS/29/15/54666/006/0040 Grantee's Tax 1.0. No. / . . . . UNTY F'I.-F\. PINEI.-I.-F\S ~~037 PG 2284 OF'F' .REC.8K And the said Party of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has hereunto set her hand and seal the day and year first above writ- ten. ~~In. ~SEAL) ~ CONSTANCE M. PARISE, Trustee u/a/d 1/22/92 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, Constance M. Parise, to me personally known or who has produced as identification and who did take an oath, and known to me to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and she acknowledged before me that she executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal at Clearwater, said County and State, this ~ day Of.Augus~. 200 . ~_f2 J4cY N tary PITOI i"!;:- ~ LAURIE ANN sTOCKWELL Print Name Notary Public. ~ta~f~ My Commission Expires: My Comm. Ecxg7'02496 . No. H.\oata\RBL\LAS\pari..\WAR-IND -2- ,..... . - CITY OF CLEARWATER LOi'lG RAi',GE PLA,NI;';G DEVELOPME;';T REvIEW HOUSING DNISIO;'; NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 Mt;,ICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVE!\'UE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 May 23, 2002 Mr. & Mrs. David Boos 844 Eldorado A venue Clearwater, Florida 33767 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS 02-04-31 at 844 Eldorado A venue Dear Mr. & Mrs. Boos: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On April 11, 2002, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Development to increase the permitted height from 30 feet to 32 feet, reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to house) and to seven feet (to staircase) along Eldorado Avenue, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-203. The application includes the demolition of an existing one-story, single-family dwelling and the construction of a two-story, single-family dwelling. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria per Section 2-203. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all Code requirements not specifically waived through this application to be met pnor issuance of any permits, Certificate of Occupancy and/or Occupation License as applicable; 2. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; and 3. That the site plan/elevations be revised to show that any structure in the sight triangle at 30 inches in height or above have minimal opaqueness, as acceptable to the Traffic Operations Manager, prior to issuance of building permit. BRI:"'''). AUM;ST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED H.\RT. VICE !\L\YOR-CO\l\IISSIONER WHITJI;EY G~\Y. CO\\\IISSIO\ER HOlT H.\.\lII.TO\, CO\l\IISSIO\ER * BII.I.)ot'sO\. COM\IISSIO\ER "EQL\I. E\lPI.OY\IE\T A\f) AFFIR\IATIVE ACTIOi'l E\IPI.O\l,R" .... ~ e e ~ May 23, 2002 Boos - Page Two I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan dated April 22, 2002. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (May 23, 2003). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. . Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to the surrounding property owners. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on May 30, 2002. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark T. Parry, Planner, at 727.562.4558. ~ Cynthia H. Tarapani, AlCP Planning Director CC: Surrounding Property Owners Mr. Alex Plisko, Plisko Architecture, P.A. S:\Planning Departrnent\C D B\Standard Rex\lnnactive or Finished Cases\Eldorado 844 Boos - Approved\Eldorado 844 DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc . a) That all.e requirements not specifically waived thro.this application to be met prior iss e of any permits, Certificate of Occupancy ~or Occupation Lice~ applicable; /~ lid waste: a No comments 7. Land reso e: a) No co 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscapine: a) No comments NOTES: · Applicant resubmitted site plan with fence clearly indicated per NS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER . Th all Code requirements not specifically waived through this application be Issuance of any permits, Certificate of Occupancy and/or Occupation License as applica 10:00 a.m. Case: FLS 02-04-31 - 844 Eldorado Avenue Owner/Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. David Boos. Location: 0.15-acres is located on the west side of Eldorado Avenue approximately 50 feet south of Gardenia Street. Atlas Page: 249A Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to increase the permitted height from 30 feet to 32 feet, reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to house) and to seven feet (to staircase) along Eldorado A venue, as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-203. Proposed Use: The application includes the demolition of an existing one-story, single-family dwelling and the construction of a two-story, single-family dwelling. Presenter: Mark T. Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Tom Glenn. Wayne Wells, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce, Cory Martens, Paul Bertels and Brian Barker Applicant/Representative: Alex Plisko (architect) and Paul Borden The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 2. Stormwater: a) No comments 3. Traffic eneineerine: · Revise site plan to show that any stairs within a site triangle are 30 inches or less in height prior to the issuance of a Development Order. Alex says he cant do this but agreed that anything in the sight triangle would have minimum opaqueness; he discussed using decorative concrete versus aluminum vertical rails. Staff recommends the aluminum as they are more narrow and easier to see through. Concrete rails have a 2-inch separation where aluminum railings have about a 4- inch opening. Also discussed where the sight triangle starts which is at the back of the sidewalk. 4. General eneineerine: a) No comments 5. Plannine: DRC agenda - 5/16/01 - Page 3 a) That all.e requirements not specifically waived thr_ this application to be met prior iss e of any permits, Certificate of Occupanc~or Occupation License as applicable; b) That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; Alex said he will meet this. c) It appears that there is no front stoop - that the stairs go right up to the front door. If the building department requires a stoop, that will affect the placement of the stairs and the front setback. The building department should be contacted regarding this. Any further decrease in front setback will require new notices to be sent out and a second review by the DRC; Alex clarified that there is a stoop 6. Solid waste: a) No comments 7. Land resource: a) No comments 8. Fire: a) No comments 9. Landscaping: a) No comments NOTES: . Ready for Development Order DRAFT CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER . That all Code requirements not specifically waived through this application to be met prior issuance of any permits, Certificate of Occupancy and/or Occupation License as applicable; . That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; and . That all site triangles be honoured. 10:20 a.m. Case: FLS 02-04-33- 525 North Hillcrest Avenue Owner/Applicant: Mr. Casey K. Carlson. Location: 0.34-acres is located on the southeast corner of North Hillcrest Avenue and Maple Street. Atlas Page: 279A Zoning: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential District Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to permit a wall with a height of five feet located three feet from the edge of pavement within the right-of-way, as part of a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-203. Proposed Use: The application includes a concrete masonry wall five feet in height with in association with an existing single-family dwelling. The fence will be located three from the front (north) property line along Maple Street where 25 feet is required. Fences permitted within the front setback in the LMDR District are otherwise limited to three feet in height. Presenter: Mark Parry, Planner. Attendees included: City Staff: Mark Parry, Tom Glenn, Wayne Wells, Don Melone, Lisa Fierce (portion of the meeting), Cory Martens, Paul Bertels and Brian Barker Applicant/Representative: Mr. Casey K. Carlson The DRC reviewed these applications with the following comments: 1. Parks and Recreation: a) No comments 2. Stormwater: a) No comments 3. Traffic engineering: a) No comments DRC agenda - 5/16/01 - Page 4 . . .J .- en Q) i ~ 00 t:: ,. J2 0 ..2 ~ Q) :> I 0 '"0 ro J..-4 0 ~ '"0 Q) ("f') ~ S I ~ -.::t 0 f ~ Q) N :> 0 ~ (/') 00 < ....:l ~ . ./ . <I) e g 000(1) .5 ~ ~ ~..... 0(1)0 0(1)-0 - :> ~ ~..d I-. <I) t 0 .- 0-0 :>t::~ ..... <I) <I) <I) ::s l ~ ~~ t:: 0 gp~ :Q d 0-0 .9~ ~ e .- 0 :>~ l , .-j (1 I r' i 'J;':~ .,'-" :~f 0 1;i "'0 <I) ~ <I) ~ ...c:: ::s ;... t t:: 0 o <I) ~~ "'0 Q) ,.....; M l"""""'4 :::s f t:: 0 ~ .- -0 u:J ~ ~ $:I 0 o I-. I o 0 ~ Q) N -- -0 0 ~- :> <I)~ ~ tZ} .- 0.. 00 < ~ :> ::s ~ .' . .J:: 0 t-o o e e 0 00-0 .9 ~ ~ e o 0 .9cl:lCl) ~ ... g .~ ~ ~ :>~< ... en CI) CI) ~ g .J:: CI) ~~ e 0 gp~ ~ a 0-0 .9~ ~ e .- 0 :>cl:l 0 - ~ en CI) cd ~ CI) ::s fo.-4 t e 0 o CI) ....-4 e~ ~ Q) M 00 .....-4 ~ t e 0 W "<:T .- -0 $:l 0 ~ ro J o l-. Q) N o 0 ~ 0 - -0 ;> ~- ~ CI) Cl)p;:j ~ ~ .- 0.. 00 :> ::s ~ .' . ,'J 1;i CD ~ ] ~ -g~ t:: 0 00-0 t:: a:l ~ 5 0-0 ..9~ ~ e ..... 0 :>~ 'if, 1 1; 't 0 ...... ""0 ~ CD ~ CD C\S ..s:: ;::l ~ t: t:: 0 o CD t::~ "'C (l) ....... ('f) 00 ~ S t t:: 0 ~ ..... -0 ~ ~a:l 0 o ~ I o 0 ~ (l) ~ --0 0 ~- :> CDp:.:j ~ en ..... 0.. 00 < ~ :> ;::l ~ !IL--' ~' I r-------------------- -- \ : :/ T ~<"" a.~~ ~~~~~. . lJi~ ~m~'~ t ~ i-:. : "' .. - ~ . -~ III ~.. il"l .- S.., ..~~~":1lE.....~.~., .;;; .~"'.... l'1 N... .~ t.... I .,1. · f .:"1;; ~Ye 09 ~ l S _ ....... CJI CICI "J"'-poo.... '. .. 'jJ -1! II.. : "'; I. .. .... = i . ~ ~ E ; ~ "' .. \"'.. _ ~. .... ~~~ =- i ~ " ~ = "'1"j,9,-.: ~ hfN-//; . I' ~v ~I;)WN ..: 3lN~ .. Ai,..!!! '; -Ii 1"rF!:" ~ c ~" '" '" '''!? : III ~ .. I i I ~ .. .. ~ ~ I ~ . _8 _~ ~ !,., ~l! ~~::. !!~trJ. II ~ ~V8 ".. L ~ ~ ~ RD==:1J J,.J If r-. CI J~ ~:: r-. co OJ ~.... .... .... I.... .... N"" ... ! [t]I~ = JI 2 r.;...- ~"'A1 '" '" .. "''' I:l c iii 0 I.. "I~ " \"'..,., - Ii! - .. ,., "" ~ ~~rT ~ '" nl~'''' i ~ Iii: i i ; .; I: ; "' .. - i5 '" I"' ..~I: -;.,~ -tl i ;: i! i! ~: ~ J1:bi.;;" E !? ::'; r----: _I;,; ~ ! ! HI,. e ~ 1 ~ I" ..... ~ d ~ m ~- lntG\v ~ VIN~N'fl - - lilt. .. .. , ~ i ~ Ii! ~ VNv~HV1 II ]fo.V ! .. ~. i!! .. ~ - - '" <x:; ! ~ '" "'" '" L! :: ~i ,,1 I! I ~ i 1!! to ll,~.. ~o :Jf7J. ! J ,} .} '!! l ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~-- i .. ~ .." '( <( IX)~ ! ~ " "'j r';' ::~.... ".... l_.:j- L 1- - -rl)l;r~(~;il'" "", on IX) f"")~ ti::...... u:l an "'" r~ C'4 .... ....:: ~ 0 I": il"l .. "" C'4........ at''' J!:l.. ~1O N~ __-I iGCj i iii i 11 2 .o/ln~1 ~~'t- 01 ~ I*\I:";-~"''''J:.''--~!~! ~~ ~ ~ .. ~ ot~ t:1:i:N ...~.. i ll1IG\v" ~ i; i ! ~;. Iii i i Ii -., ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii lAv" I! ';11~~ ,~ t~i I'l ~_ os p 3:mtJB ~ Q i.. ... :i ~ Ct I:~!:t;jj~ :; a ! ~ .-,: OOl!i '2.. I lit 5' ~ ., ~ -- 2 '!- ~~-~I'" "" : .....;:. to. 'lY ... ... - L...- ^ ~i:t.. ~"" =. :~i!!I! ~~:i':7~ ~1~~ ~ ~",-Ii' ",..., 0_ ~,",IX:: ~::! --L E f83 10 (h ~ ;: ~ ".. CD ~ _ N~" ....~ ~ ~ ili 01 e r-- 110 OI~I~ ~ Ql - po.., I'CI r- {T :::::Z~G! '" '" - ";:' .. _ i .. '" :~~ - - ~~ ~"~ ~ ~ d", I? .. :\N _~y~; -; ~\i/ftr.'" ; ;~; ~.. ;~.~ Q.. r-L ~i.i.'O"'I!!! ....N- .n nN-211t1!l.... ie.."......:Y,o.,~...... <( S l: l: It " ..! ~! = is' (..~ ~. a i -'- .. ~ ~ ~ ~ Co AV1VOlMI Ii III ~~ Ii lflG\V ~Y1yow... IN' ! ~. !! ! ~ ~! l"j:f ~ ~ ~al ~ i i i i i li i .. ~. r ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~.. a ~ i J ,.,!I..i ,,! "'\ (i ::? __l!; ~ ~ !! ~ ~ ~ ~=-= i "'''::."' ~ '" "I:": e /'" !?~~; ::?"rl '!!";: ..!? ~ ;;.,-'1- - ::.i",\~::-' .. .. ~ ,...., & ".; I; : _ "'.. ~I '..- 1 g I'" " .. '" .. I'::;' N _ ",,, '" ';i : I: \~ :J~ :: ~: ; ; ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~I :i. """"'4 a... . .. i ~ i ! i -i I ~ I = i ~ a i i ~ t ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ Ii o 'i. Ii ~v a I II lAY 0CJ'iW0"0 ~i~ ; I "'I ~ '" ==}",. ~~!I! -=" t ~nJ~ "=5,,, ~ :~! ~ _~.. } "E.J :~! I}I! - I~ r:-}f~ :"- r~..,~'" :1" ;1 _ s OUl......j:lll c::: .:z: ~ r&I .... 2 ~ ~'i" ~ fB ~ :~.~ ~ <:I. ~ ":~~ ~ il: -. - ~ ~.. ~2:o'6e,,! :;::lilZ. .'l: !jfe S5il5~~t u 8 ~ C/)~ .gi ~ ~~~~r;~ r_ ~ D.. a::..... 1- ..- 0 "N"! o ~ }~! >- l!1 ::l ",E~ f:: a.. II:l g., t t.) K: -f~ ~ . . ...l-6Jt~ ~ = il;t:~~~l ~~i.~H~j~ ~! ;~if~i;;~ te ~ i~~ ~~~~ 1 ~ ~ :t7-j05ia:~ ~c..; ~i:l~~~~! ;~~ ~~:S~ .o~~~ ~o1~ ~~.l:a."6~~~~ ~.S!........ ........-!il.t..... i-;;~ ~~i~:J!~f~ :~~ i~1~~i~:~~ . [I SE .~---<t . - ~ ~ ~ c a i] .. il !! l5 ~.-;. ';iei~... ::t:s ~~iE~o~;!; ~ ~ ~~;J~:~~~~ l ~~~~~~~~li5 ~ "0 00 W'- III 0> 5", W'- Iroo <( (/)CJ> <(V -IN I- <( zw o o t~ Z li'll Z LLIIl O 0", .N N~I ~ ZI/) 0 0 '" ~ Cl: W ,. 0 a. x 0 w .... ~ Cl: Z Cl: z ZEB a. z w 0 .. a. ;::: w I 0 .. ~ z ;;! Cl: Z ::; ~ a. '" ~ lD 8 Vi ,. (II Cl: .... W W 0 ::J .... .. z z 0 ~ 0 z 51 w ~ Z Cl ,. ::; ">- .... " " :; w w 0 '" ~ Cl 0 Cl W Z W 0 Z 0 ~ .. Cl: ~ Z z '::::- ...J Oi Cl 0 0 ~ :? w lD Q .. Q N N ~ 0 , ~ w @ .". I r1t -l '" I t'l <II . ~ ~ I 1<] :::s I LiJ 2498 A '" 1 k:J~ -;~K ~r:-r:r: II ..(jrAJ ~O;) Sloo-<. ~ ~ - ~JwoJt' W?J/DYnWl:J'OJ fA ~01'XJ1)rr ~ f> 1r~ . ~ " t:>d'a6.1llW""-U!6ua '~lIeJ:)~ 'Wd LZ:g&:EO ~OIE~IZO '6Mp'\f617Z\S\I11\f\OV:)Oln\f\NI~N3rS . . PLANNING DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE/CONVERSA TION TRACKING FORM Case: (j>t > 01-0'( -., DRC date: t;. (6.~ 1:. CDB date: - Include all conversations related to the case with contact and phone number, date received correspondence/plans, etc. S:\Planning Departmenf\C D lJIforms and shells\Miscellaneous\correspondence and conversation tracking sheet. doc . . IJ"II,,, ..~~~LOF Tlitit++. ~...~\ \)"."u~,,,,,c;7x,,,, ,..:.t.,~" ~",-,..'T-' \:;;:'" ~..-... ~~~.),/ ij ~ ~~ ~C":>>~~,. ': "'53:~ ""r:~-=~ ~ ...~':.:==~.9~ -:r~~;=~ ~ ~ ~~~"~,:uo..~~.\' .................~TE~."'..".. 4"1" . CITY OF CLEARWATER loNG RANGE PlANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 April 30, 2002 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 844 ELDORADO A VENUE (FLS 02-04-31) To Surrounding Property Owners: The purpose of this letter is to correct an error in a notice that you may have just received regarding a Flexible Standard Development application received from Mr. & Mrs. David Boos for the property at 724 Eldorado Avenue. The request is to increase the permitted height from 30 feet to 32 feet, reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to house) and to seven feet (to staircase) along Eldorado Avenue, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-203. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this case. You may participate by calling me to discuss the case, visit our office to review the application and/or send written comments to be considered in the City's review of the project. The earliest possible date that the City will make a decision on the project is May 23, 2002. Therefore, please contact me or send your written comments no later than that date. On May 16, 2002, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staft) will review the project for compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review, the Planning Director will make a decision to either approve or deny the application. As a nearby property owner, you will receive a copy of the Development Order that describes the Planning Director's decision on the project. Should you be dissatisfied with the City's decision, you have the right to appeal the decision to the Community Development Board. Please be aware that the appeal must be filed with the City within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4558 should you have any questions. Sincer Mark T. Parry Lead Planner S;\Planning Depanmen^C D B\Standard Flei\Pending CasesV - Up for the Next DRC\Eldorado 844 Boo:;\Eldorado 844 N otificationLette r. doc BRIAN). AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYf HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER * BU.L)ONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER" tiLl - / ?}n{q et~ 05 ./X0 . } 5- 5W,flfJ 006 00'/0 . Z7 SCIPIONE, CLAUDIO 822 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1312 BURRELL, C EVERETT 828 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1312 MEARS, BARRY L 832 ELDORADO AVE CLEARItJATER FL 33767 1309 SUAREZ, JOSEPH S TRE SCOTT, RHONDA L TRE 2141 IBIS DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 6613 TAFT, THERESA E SCHAETZ, GERALD TRE 500 TREASURE ISLAND CSWY ~ 7 TREASURE ISLAND FL 33706 1145 BOOS, DAVID M BOOS, KATHY M 2891 SWEETGUM WAY S CLEARWATER FL 33761 3919 RUSSELL, SHELDON P RUSSELL, ING B 848 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1309 SHERMAN, THOMAS C SHERMAN, KATHLEEN M 1932 HIDDEN SHORES DR DIXON IL 61021 8012 KARNES, DONALD K KARNES, TERRI L 7717 CHAPEL RIDGE DR CORDOVA TN ?;80 1 f, 7897 SIMONELLI, JOSEPH E PO BOX 3964 CLEARWATER FL 33767 8964 CHRYSOCHOOS, JACQUES M CHRYSOCHOOS, LESLIE C 1125 ABBEYS WAY T A11P{:1 FL ?;?;f,O? RAMOS, DAVID I KEARNS-RAMOS, VIRGINIA 851 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL ?;?;7f..7 1?0? MUELLER, THOMAS MUELLER, KIRSTEN C 855 ELDORA DO AVE CLE("RWATER FL ~~7f...7 1?0? CRAYEX CORP 1747 COMMERCE DR PIQUA OH 45356 2601 REILLY, PHILIP r-<E I LL Y, SANDRA J 6209 SYDNEY RD nURFf':\X STA VA ??0?;91 f,90 MORGAN, DAVID G GORDON, MARCIA 854 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1203 STRATIGEAS, PETER 850 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1203 GEORGE, ALLEN A GEORGE, MELIA S 831 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 1311 GOC, NICOLE F 839 ELDORADO f':\VE CLEARWATER FL 33767 1311 SWEENIE, DEBORAH E 2936 TILLINGHAST TRL RALEIGH NC 27613 5411 . . CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REvIEW HOUSING DNISION NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 April 25, 2002 Mr. & Mrs. David Boos 2891 Sweetgum Way South Clearwater, Florida 33761 FILE Application for Flexible Standard approval (FL~ O:.z-U4-31) to increase the permitted height from 30 feet to 32 feet, reduce tHe tront (east) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to house) and to seven feet (to staircase) along Eldorado Avenue, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-203. RE: Dear Mr. & Mrs. Boos: The Planning staff has reviewed your application to increase the permitted height from 30 feet to 32 feet, reduce the front (east) setback from 25 feet to 17.5 feet (to house) and to seven feet (to staircase) along Eldorado Avenue, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-203 at 844 Eldorado A venue. The application includes the demolition of an existing one-story single-family dwelling and the construction of a two-story single-family dwelling. The house will be located 17 feet from the front (east) property line along Eldorado A venue and a staircase providing ingress/egress to the house will be seven feet from the front property line. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS 02-04-31. The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on May 16, 2002 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle A venue in Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Nicodemus at 562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. BRWl J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER ED HART, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER BILLJONsm;, CO^IMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" April 25,2002 Boos - Page Two . . You or a representative must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558. Sin~,~re!y'}ours,'.. r _.._~. Mark Parry Lead Planner cc: Mr. Alex Plisko; Plisko Architecture, P.A. S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\Standard Flei\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Eldorado 844 Boos\Eldorado 844 complete letter. doc " . . fi;) re tTu .,--.. ': O)~~ll U ~(l r~ ([1 ,') MAY ~~-~J@ :ur SIJCS _...:.:.2J~ t1 Nicole Goc 839 Eldorado Avenue Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 4 May 2002 Mark T. Parry Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Dear Mr. Parry: This is to let you know that I am in favor of granting Mr.& Mrs. David Boos request regarding the property at 844 Eldorado Avenue (FLS 02-04-31). I believe that the proposed structure will be a great asset to our street and I will enjoy having it as part of my view. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 1; t~cr- Nicole Goc Property Owner, 839 Eldorado Avenue (727) 467-0467