FLS2003-06026
.
.
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
~~~~~~~~;G~t\E[,
PROPERTIES: ' -
NORTH:
SOUTH: J'H'll 9 2003=
WEST:
EAST:
~..... r
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
A
~
SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
Ji... SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
(" r'-'d
,~, I
r', ,.... "'R,^'ATC
',..11._1':1"'\\1 vnl LI '"
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 11/05/02)
- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, P
MAILING ADDRESS:
APPLICANT NAME',
AGENT NAME:
N()/lJ;S
fILl
MAILING ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
CELL NUMBER:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
B. PROPOSED DEVELO
STREET ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): __
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): ~D U CS S Ice;. setl3Ac.K ~rz A GAR Pl>ta. \' ~ '
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residential Intill Project- City at Clearwater
.
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
(S- CC- /lrr/fr2/18{) fYldfdfiJ
2. The proposed development will .
impair the value thereof.
nd buildings or significantly
3. s residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
lA/I) J ;Vrrf-J:1h Pl}{'/T -fl{/f~r-LC,
5.
6. The design of the propo ~gf;nt m ni izes ao~cts~ang ua I., a o~t c and ~tOry and hours of operation impacts,
~OP~ ~~ frf& . ~,~ ~
[]' -~~r-~~ 00 fie ()'-r~ - 1.--.- --- ~ Q_
\
o Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1.
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearw ater
.
.
2.
CULt( tJEf61f(1JtI1t)d()
3.
/
~-~~~
4.
71~E
5.
The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential in III project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
~1jj~7i1t)j;;;;ii!jtlf A1f~l~mfA1!5
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and oft-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
imm iate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21 )
o STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
..
~-'
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
. SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
A< TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and withinn. uti ~dj,C~~...C'~y species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
- -\ including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed); C ~/ ujV f/ /
)( LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior
to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall
be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved;
.
.
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as a Iicableo
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y, X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
,
, ~
.
.
H.. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
o LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees. palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
I rrigation notes.
o REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible);
o IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
)s( BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
o Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
,,/kf'/
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _ day of
A.D. 20_ to me and/or by
, who is personally known has
produced as
identification.
Notary public,
My commission expires:
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
Map Output
.
.
Page 1 of 1
605 EDENVILLE
~,
.........
~
---. '
,J
,J-,,))
[ J.
~"
,/.,~~
I
O.53mi
R EMCr:~\l~D
. . .~J l,"~"" ~ '''is' ~.!.'1'~
J I "I 1"\
J I.,,} l\ ,1 '~:'!
PI ^N'I\.t!'~'r" DV~!;)?' "}-C.~ M-NT
J'\~ ~i't U~~.:; ':C':'~- j":;c,r'\ i hJLc'
CITY OF CLEAR\/VATER
http://eitygis.cIearwater-fl.eomlserv let/eom.esri .esrimap.Esrimap ?ServieeN ame=O VMap&I... 6/19/2003
// '.
\ . ~GAL Dcs6RI~TIDN
LOT 6, BLOCK B, EDENVILLE SUBDIVISION, AS RECORD L , PLAT BOOK 35,
PAGE 97, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELlAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CERTIFIED TO:
DONALD JACKSON
>>
c
~
U
"'
...
"'
c
u
c
o
u
M
I
~I~
z ,..
~ 'O~
< ~.!.
~'~!
>/ll'
z ~_
l!5 e
WI
,
l
I
,
1'00'
I
I
['00'
i ~
. u
I
I
SECTION 18. TOWNSHIP 29 SO
PINELLAS COUNn,
ANGE 16 EAST
ORIDA
r;
CONC
CSW
EP
FCM
FIR
FIP
LB
RLS
SIR
WF
~
= AIR CONDITIONER
= CENTERLINE OF RIGHT-Of-WAY
= CHAIN LINK FENCE
= CONCRETE
= CONCRETE SIDEWALK
= EDGE OF PAVEMENT
= FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT
- FOUND IRON ROD
= rOUND IRON PIPE
= LICENSED BUSINESS
= REGISTERED lAND SURVEYOR
- SET IRON ROD ILB938
= WOOD FENCE
j
t
i
," 20'
5
'"
V>
u
:or
"'
...
"'
c
u
c
o
u
1."
15.0'
N.89"41'18UW. 95.20' P
FIR 1/2"
q
4'CLf
FIR 1/2"
csw
24.9'
~
CL
<ll
E
o
:t:~
<ll<ll
;';::::-
-0-
~~
~o
o~
G
'"
c
c
6\
..
-'
'-i
:.
M
'"
V>
U
1 SlORY MASONRY
RESlDEHCl! , IQIi
g
It'j
co
3l:
~o-\.~.
~'oQ\~e $)
r<;" I::)
p
c:;
lIj
15.0'
'"
V>
U
:.
IE<f(fj.
rp.{)fff9
..
~I
I
North Ri ht of Wo Line Druid Rood
RECEIVED
JUN 19 2003
PLANNING DEPAHTMENT
,-'." "'" r:! ':I\RVJATER
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED
HEREON MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER
61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
G. 0 S',;,,~ c=(n( b~
LOW .' .'. "DATE
REGISTERED NO SURVEYOR N6. 1303.
NOT VALID WITHOUT EM30SSED SEAL..
NOTES:
1) BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
EDENVILLE AVENUE, AS BEING S.01'00'04"W. PER PLAT.
2) SURVEY PREPARED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT.
3) FI~ WORK COMPUETEO ON 2/4/03.
4) PROPetm' APPEARS TO BE LOCATED IN ZONE "X"
ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE
MAP, COMMUNITY-PANEL NO. 125096 0017 D,
REVISED: AUGUST 19. 1991.
~
~
SINCE 1864
HARRY W.. .MARLOW, INC.
l,ANQ:!lURVEYORS
~ .~ Al/1HQI!IlA1!llN NO. UllI3ll
HOME 0F1I(% . 0C4lA OFFICE:
3841 I8lH AVENUE'~ 252.5 N.L 3fIH A\lENUE
~~~ ~w~& '(:$52~-55JJ~ .Ir~
DRAWN BY: RM DATE: 2/13/03
CHECKED BY: HWM SCALE: ," = 20'
FIELD BOOK: T01-02 PAGE: 70-76 FILE NO.: M-6886
JO# 03-020
r
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
FLS2003-06026
605 EDENVILLE A VE
Date Received: 6/19/2003
~ON. DO;~ Ptc<:. \
.
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 299B
r=~2~7:~l;.' 'tlf fiI
iC';f!' 6~ II
CK re: r~Q7_~
DAnRATE / p.
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
September 4, 2003
Donald K. Jackson
605 Edenville Road
Clearwater, FL 33764
fILE
Jl r
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-06026 at 605 Edenville Road.
Dear Mr. Donald K. Jackson:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On August 14,2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your
application for Flexible Standard Development to reduce the side (south) setback from 5 feet to one
foot for an aluminum carport and driveway, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of
Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of the application under the following bases:
Bases for approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill
Project per Section 2-203.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913; and
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and may enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (September 4, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to
obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the
issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you
when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * Bll.L]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
I
September 4, 2003
Jackson - Page 2
.
.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review
Specialist at 727-562-4539. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website:
www.c1earwater-fl.com.
~~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D Wtandard FleNending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Edenville Rd 605 - Jackson (IMDRJ'.Edenville Rd 605
DEVELOPMENT ORDER. doc
I
I
I .
.
.
DRC Meeting Date: August 14.2003
Case Number: FLS2003-06026
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
FILE
APPLICANT:
Mr. Donald K. Jackson
LOCATION:
605 Edenville Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Standard approval to reduce the side (south) setback from 5
feet to one inch (amended to one foot) for an aluminum carport and
driveway, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of
Section 2-203.C
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Mr. Donald K. Jackson
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.14 acres; 6,175 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 65 feet of width by 95 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single-family dwelling
Single-family dwelling with carport
PLAN CATEGORY:
RD, Residential Low Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
LMDR, Low Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family residential
West: Single-family residential
East: Mobile Home Park
South: Single-family residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity.
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14, 2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
ANALYSIS:
The 0.14 acres located on the east side of Edenville A venue, approximately 500 feet south of Gulf
to Bay Boulevard. It is located within a residentially developed area. The site contains an existing
1,102 square foot, single-story, single-family dwelling with multiple accessory storage sheds. The
site has frontage along Edenville Avenue with an existing singlewide driveway located in the
middle of the property. The existing property does not meet the minimum number of required
parking spaces (two) for a single-family residence and the addition of the proposed carport would
bring this into compliance with code.
The proposal includes an aluminum carport and a concrete or asphalt driveway in association with
an existing single-family dwelling. Surrounding properties have been developed with similar sized
carports that meet the side setback requirement. Other accessory structures, such as sheds and
decks on neighboring properties appear to have been placed at less than the required five-foot
setback. After review of building permit histories for these properties it is uncertain how many of
these accessory structures were legally permitted and constructed. The proposal does meet all
Code requirements and applicable criteria.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site for the conversion of a single
family home to attached dwellings (CDC2003-00073).
A. COMPLIANCE LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-
201.1):
STANDARD REQUIREDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 7.5 dwelling units See Code See Code No
per acre (one unit) Enforcement Enforcement
Anal ysis Analysis
IMPERVIOUS 0.65 0.40 0.47 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PROJECTS IN THE LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section
2-202.C):
STANDARD PERMITTEDI EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 6,175 square feet 6,175 square feet Yes
(minimum)
LOT WIDTH N/A 65 feet 65 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT 10 - 25 feet 24.9 feet 25 feet Yes
SETBACK
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14, 2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
~--
.
.
REAR o - 25 feet 31.3 31.3 Yes
SETBACK
SIDE o - 15 feet South: 19.8 feet South: One foot No
SETBACK North: 7 feet North: 7 feet
HEIGHT 30 feet 15 feet 15 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING Two spaces per One Space Two spaces Yes
SPACES unit (two spaces)
minimum
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE LOW
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-203.C):
1. Single-family, detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential
infill project applications;
The proposal includes an aluminum carport and driveway in association with a proposed
single-family dwelling. The Code Enforcement Analysis reveals an ongoing Code Board
case for multi-family dwellings in a single-family dwelling. The proposed single-family
use is permitted with in the LMDR District.
2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development
standards;
The proposal does not meet this criterion. It is possible for the proposed development to
meet the required setback with a carport that is not as wide. The applicant has already
purchased the carport and the residential infill process is the only means for this carport to
be allowed.
3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposal is similar in size, setback, and scale to other carports within the surrounding
vicinity. The proposed side setback is at one foot. An aluminum carport permitted at a one-
foot side setback could have a negative financial impact on the fair market value of
neighboring properties.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
The site is zoned Low Medium Density Residential District and the proposed single-family
dwelling addition will be in compliance with the zoning. The addition of an accessory,
aluminum carport is a permitted use.
5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly single-family residential dwellings and according to
the Code Enforcement Analysis the applicant has a multi-family dwelling unit. The
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August] 4, 2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
proposed accessory aluminum carport is compatible with adjacent land uses at a one-foot
side setback.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The proposal includes a significant decrease in the side setback for the proposed carport.
The proposal will not result in a setback similar in character to other homes having carports
in the neighborhood. However, there are many accessory structures places at one foot or
less in relation to side setbacks in this neighborhood.
7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposal will result in an accessory, carport similar in location to other accessory
structures in the neighborhood. There are many accessory structures places at one foot or
less in relation to side setbacks in this neighborhood and will enhance the community
character of the immediate vicinity at a one-inch side setback.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development does not aesthetically improve the immediate area and
Clearwater as a whole by conforming to existing neighboring homes with attached
carports. The reduction in the side (south) setback is not similar to other properties in the
area.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The proposed development does not aesthetically improve the immediate area and
Clearwater as a whole by conforming to existing neighboring homes with attached
carports. The reduction in the side (south) setback is not similar to other properties in the
area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Low Medium Density Residential District and characterized by single-
family dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14, 2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
compliance with that zoning classification. The development complies with density and
impervious surface ratio standards within the District. The proposed setback not
characteristic to surrounding properties in the neighborhood and could impair the value of
adjacent lands.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed accessory use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood and is permitted in the Low Medium Density Residential District.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion in the area.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character with regards to size,
scale and setbacks to other structures in the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
The proposal could create drainage issues at a one-foot side setback with water run off
dispensing onto the neighboring property.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
August 14, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard
Development application to reduce the side (south) setback from 5 feet to one foot for an
aluminum carport and driveway, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-
203.C for 605 Edenville Avenue with the following bases.
Bases for Denial:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill
Project per Section 2-203.C;
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913;
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
John V. Schodtler:
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard F1ex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Edenville Rd 605 - Jackson (LMDR)\Edenville Rd 605
REPORT.doc
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14, 2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
DRC Meeting Date: August 14.2003
Case Number: FLS2003-06026
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DRAFT STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
APPLICANT:
Mr. Donald K. Jackson
f. 'LI=
I ltil.
LOCATION:
605 Edenville Avenue
REQUEST:
Flexible Standard approval to reduce the side (south) setback from 5
feet to one inch for an aluminum carport and driveway, as a
residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C
PLANS REVIEWED:
Site plan submitted by Mr. Donald K. Jackson
SITE INFORMATION:
PROPERTY SIZE:
0.14 acres; 6,175 square feet
DIMENSIONS OF SITE: 65 feet of width by 95 feet of depth
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single- family dwelling
Single-family dwelling with carport
PLAN CATEGORY:
RD, Residential Low Classification
ZONING DISTRICT:
LMDR, Low Density Residential District
ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Single-family residential
West: Single-family residential
East: Mobile Home Park
South: Single-family residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity.
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14,2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
ANALYSIS:
The 0.14 acres located on the east side of Edenville Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of Gulf
to Bay Boulevard. It is located within a residentially developed area. The site contains an existing
1,102 square foot, single-story, single-family dwelling with multiple accessory storage sheds. The
site has frontage along Edenville Avenue with an existing singlewide driveway located in the
middle of the property. The existing property does not meet the minimum number of required
parking spaces (two) for a single-family residence and the addition of the proposed carport would
bring this into compliance with code.
The proposal includes an aluminum carport and a concrete or asphalt driveway in association with
an existing single-family dwelling. Surrounding properties have been developed with similar sized
carports that meet the side setback requirement. Other accessory structures, such as sheds and
decks on neighboring properties appear to have been placed at less than the required five-foot
setback. After review of building permit histories for these properties it is uncertain how many of
these accessory structures were legally permitted and constructed. The proposal does otherwise
meet all Code requirements and applicable criteria.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site for the conversion of a single
family home to attached dwellings (CDC2003-00073).
A. COMPLIANCE LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-
201.1):
STANDARD REQUIRED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
PERMITTED COMPLIANCE?
DENSITY 7.5 dwelling units See Code See Code No
per acre (one unit) Enforcement Enforcement
Analysis Analysis
IMPERVIOUS 0.65 0.40 0.47 Yes
SURFACE
RATIO (lSR)
B. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL
PROJECTS IN THE LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section
2-202.C):
STANDARD PERMITTED/ EXISTING PROPOSED IN
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE?
LOT AREA N/A 6,175 square feet 6,175 square feet Yes
(minimum)
LOT WIDTH N/A 65 feet 65 feet Yes
(minimum)
FRONT 10 - 25 feet 24.9 feet 25 feet Yes
SETBACK
REAR o - 25 feet 31.3 31.3 Yes
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14,2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
SETBACK
SIDE o - 15 feet South: 19.8 feet South: One inch No
SETBACK North: 7 feet North: 7 feet
HEIGHT 30 feet 15 feet 15 feet Yes
maximum
PARKING Two spaces per One Space Two spaces Yes
SPACES unit (two spaces)
minimum
C. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS IN THE LOW
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (Section 2-203.C):
1. Single-family, detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential
in fill project applications;
The proposal includes an aluminum carport and driveway in association with a proposed
single- family dwelling. The Code Enforcement Analysis reveals an ongoing Code Board
case for multi-family dwellings in a single-family dwelling. The proposed use is permitted
with in the LMDR District.
2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development
standards;
The proposal does not meet this criterion. It is possible for the proposed development to
meet the required setback with a carport that is not as wide. The applicant has already
purchased the carport and the residential infill process is the only means for this carport to
be allowed.
3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential in fill project
will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
The proposal is similar in size and scale to other carports within the surrounding vicinity.
The proposed side setback is at one inch. The city will only acknowledge characteristic
setbacks that have been approved through a permit. An aluminum carport permitted at a
one-inch side setback could have a negative financial impact on the fair market value of
neighboring properties.
4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district;
The site is zoned Low Medium Density Residential District and the proposed single-family
dwelling addition will not be in compliance with the zoning. The addition of an aluminum
carport is a permitted use.
5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses;
Adjacent land uses are predominantly single-family residential dwellings and according to
the Code Enforcement Analysis the applicant has a multi-family dwelling unit. The
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14,2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
proposed aluminum carport is not compatible with adjacent land uses at a one-inch side
setback.
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential in fill project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
The proposal includes a significant decrease in the side setback for the proposed carport.
The proposal will not result in a setback similar in character to other homes having carports
in the neighborhood.
7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
The proposal will not result in an attached carport similar in location to other homes in the
neighborhood. It is not consistent with the Low Medium Density Residential District and
will not enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity at a one-inch side
setback.
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The proposed development does not aesthetically improve the immediate area and
Clearwater as a whole by conforming to existing neighboring homes with attached
carports. The reduction in the side (south) setback is not similar to other properties in the
area.
D. GENERAL APPLICABILITY (Section 3-913): Conditions which are imposed by the
Community Development Coordinator and the Community Development Board
pursuant to a Level One or a Level Two Approval shall ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
The proposed development does not aesthetically improve the immediate area and
Clearwater as a whole by conforming to existing neighboring homes with attached
carports. The reduction in the side (south) setback is not similar to other properties in the
area.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
The site is zoned Low Medium Density Residential District and characterized by single-
family dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in
compliance with that zoning classification. The development complies with density and
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14,2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
.
impervious surface ratio standards within the District. The proposed setback is not
characteristic to surrounding properties in the neighborhood and could impair the value of
adjacent lands.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed accessory use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the
neighborhood and is permitted in the Low Medium Density Residential District.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion in the area.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is consistent with the community character with regards to size
and scale, but not with setbacks to other structures in the immediate vicinity.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
7.
The proposal could create drainage issues at a one-inch side setback with water run off
dispensing onto the neighboring property.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
August 14, 2003. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Standard
Development application to reduce the side (south) setback from 5 feet to one inch for an
aluminum carport and driveway, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-
203.C for 605 Edenville Avenue with the following bases.
Bases for Denial:
1. The proposal fails to comply with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential
Infill Project per Section 2-203.C;
2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913;
3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area and will not enhance other
redevelopment efforts; and
4. The majority of existing accessory uses within the surrounding vicinity were not permitted.
John V. Schodtler:
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Edenville Rd 605 - Jackson (LMDR)\Edenville Rd 605
REPORT.doc
Staff Report - Development Review Committee - August 14,2003 - Case FLS2003-06026
.
MR. JOHN SCHODTLER
DEV REVIEW SPECIALIST
PLANNING DEPART.
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARlt'lATER, FLA
,,:;~
i:I "<:'
-
PI, ~ED'
i 1} I ..
J
AUG 18, 2003
REFER TO CARPORT
VARIANCE HEARING
FROM PROP LINE
605 EDENVILLE AVE
DEAR MR. SCHODTLER
IN REFERENCE TO THE MEETING HELD ON THE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR A CARPORT.
THERE IS ONLY ABOUT 15" THAT CAN BE USED AS A SET BACK FHOM THE
PROPEHTY LINE. WE NEED ABOUT 2 OR 3 INCHES TO MOVE THE CARPORT AROUND BEFORE
SECURING IT DOWN.
THE HOUSE IS NOT STRAIGHT ON THE LOT AND TO MAKE THE CARPOHT LOOK RIGHT
IT MAY BE NECESSAHY TO BE 12" AT THE FRONT AND 15" AT THE BACK OF THE CAHPOHT
FROM THE SIDE PHOPEHTY LINE. LOOKING STHAIGHT AT THE CARPORT, Sm1EONE ltWULD
NOTICE, IF IT DID NOT FOLLOW THE HOUSE LINES.
WE DID NOT BUILD THE HOUSE, SO WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE WAY THE HOUSE WAS
BUILT TO LOOK HIGHT.
APPHECIATE YOUH HELP.
.
..
.
.
.
MR. JOHN SCHODTLER
DEV. REVIEW SPECIALIST
. PLANNING DEPART.
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FLA 33758
.
.
-,.~,
!lo ":,,,,\,,\~\_::<\
l'>,\~,:'l~"
o \..r" >,!
\" \:...: 'I
C,\ '
.
AUG 7, 2003
REFER TO CARPORT
VARIANCE FBON PBOP LINE
DEAR MR. JOHN SCHODTLER
IN BESPONSE TO YOUB LETTEB OF 7-24-03, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT I CALLED
. ON 8-7-03, ABOUT THE MEETING ON 8-14-03 AT 11:45 AM.
I WILL HAVE TO SEND MY WIFE, JUANITA JACKSON WHO IS PART OWNER, DUE TO
THAT I WILL HAVE TO BE IN MD. IN PROCESS OF SELLING A HOUSE, AND HAVE TO BE THERE
. AT LEAST TO 8/~11/03.
YOU WILL HAVE TO HAVE HER SIGN THE NOTARIZED FORN REQUESTED IN THE
LETTER OF 7-24-03.
. THE VABIANCE REQUESTED WAS 1" FBOM THE PBOPERTY LINE, BUT IT CAN BE
ABOUT 12" OR CLOSE TO IT.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I .
.
.
33764
:-r
.,....'-...".
","':'C~'''. ~ ..
\....v 'f.:.
.,
",'
( r ~~,), ':')
\.1 ',_':1 .
,.,.
.
. .
Community Response Team
Planning Oept. Cases - ORC
Case No.8- ~jj -0 lv--,o;).. L::, Meeting Date: August 14, 2003
Location: l6' (JC..., 0l1, nIlAA1(Q
o Current Use:
I~ctive Code Enforcement Case (no ye :
/AddreSS number@(no)(vacantland)
r:(~-'" landsCaPin~(nO)
~overgrown (yesl@
~ebris (yes)~
~noperative vehicle(s) (yes)@Y
~Building(s) ~ (fair) (poor) (vacant land)
~Fencing (nOne~(dilaPidated) (broken and/or missing pieces)
4aint ~ (fair) (poor) (garish)
rGrass Parking (yes)~
~esidential Parking Violations (yes) @y
-r5' Signag~(Ok) (not ok) (billboard)
/parkin~(striPed) (handicapped) (needs repaving)
~Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed)
~ Outdoor storage (yes)@9)
Date~eviewed by:
Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03
Telephone: -5 {., ~'-i f ~
..Pinellas County Property A.iser Information: 1829 162466000.60
Page 2 of 5
18 / 29 / 16 / 24660 / 002 / 0060
31-Jul-Z003 JiM sMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:18:36
Ownership InforMation Residential Property Address. Use. and Sales
JACKSON. DONALD K
JACKSON. JUANITA P
605 EDENUILLE AUE
CLEARWATER fL 33164-6331
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 605 EDENUILLE AUE
of Jan 1, 2002, based on Census Tract: Z54.04
sales froM 2000 - 2001:
16.300 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/IMp
Plat InforMation 8 /1.999 10.618/1. 918 65.000 (Q) I
1955: Book 035 Pgs 091- 1 /1.98Z 5. Z9Z/1. 995 38.000 (Q) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /1.980 4.999/ 619 35.000 (Q) I
0000 : Book Pgs - 0 /1.919 4.936/1.Z94 Z6.000 (Q) I
2002 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 6Z.600 HOMestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic : 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 6Z.600 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 6Z.600 Ag r icu 1 tural : 0
2002 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
02 Millage: Z3. Z911 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
02 Taxes: 1.458. OZ
1) 65 x 95 600.00 65.00 F
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2002 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1. 458. OZ 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 31.830
2002 taxes will be :
1. 458. OZ
Short Legal EDENUILLE SUB BLK B. LOT 6
Description
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.20&s=3&t= 1 &u=O&p... 7/31/2003
.Pinellas County Property A.aiser Information: 1829162466000.60
Page 3 of 5
18 / 29 / 16 / 24660 / 002 / 0060 :01
31-Jul-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:18:34
Residential Card 01 of 1 Prop Use: 210 Land Use: 01 Living Units: 1
IMp Type: Single Family Prop Address: 605 EDENUILLE AUE
Structural
Elemen.ts
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Roo f FraMe
Roof Cover
Continuous Wall
Slab on Grade
Frame/Siding
Gable-Hip
Composite Shingle
Quali ty
Year Built
Effective Age
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Ave rage
1. 954
30
Central Duct
Cooling (Central)
6
o
o
o
# Stories 1.0
Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr
Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster
Sub
Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 912 7) .00 0
2) Base Semi Finished .80 190 8) .00 0
3) Utility .35 50 9) .00 0
4) Open Po rch .15 252 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Residen.tial Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) PATIO/DECK 150SF 2.50 150 0 260 1. 991
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 260
Map With 2003 Sales (Red), 2002 Sales (Green), 2001 Sales (Blue)
~~[t][!]~gJ
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl. us/htbinlcgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.20&s=3&t= 1 &u=O&p... 7/31/2003
.
.
1",TII11
..f~~~LoF T/ft;r;
\~~ ~"".""~4I'f#7X---
\~""I ~###-'7-':.
\~~ \ , . ~ ~..
: t:}~<o.'.. ~ ~
..g~:.~~~
":-4 ':.,. .,...... ....... ~~
':.'.~~-; .' ~~
":. ~/1;F.. ,f', ~ .\
..:.r!J'~ '#1,." ~~,~
;;#)1THt"I.
'III"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
July 25, 2003
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL AT 605 EDENVILLE AVENUE (FLS2003-06026)
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 605 Edenville A venue, the City of Clearwater Planning
Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that
property. The request is to reduce the side (south) setback from 5 feet to one inch for an aluminum
carport and driveway, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. The
proposal includes a carport/driveway addition in association with an existing single-family dwelling..
On August 14,2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff)
will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's
Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will
issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application and a
copy of this Development Order will be mailed to you. The earliest date that the City will make a
decision on the application will be August 22, 2003.
The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application. You may visit our
office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the
application.
An appeal of the decision to the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners
within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the
Development Review Committee meeting (August 14, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an
appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. I can be reached at 727-562-4604 or
ischodtl@clearwater-fl.com. *Make Us Your Favorite! You may access the Planning Department
through the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com.
~,~~
J oMS~hodtler
Development Review Specialist
FII. E
S:\Planning Depanmen^C D B\Standard FleiIPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Edville Rd 605 - Jackson (lMDR)\Edenville Rd 605 Notify.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HM1ILTOK, COMMISSIONER
FRA."IK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMEI'iT A,'\jJ) AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
tJOTJrJr~"
~j'~\~LOF T/(t~~
~.~1~t),'f'.TLrI#~c,71t.....
\~~,"" ~'7-"
.. ~ l I ~..:..".....,
I!t..,P~~ ,\ 'I..'!' ~ ~-
..._~";... ':. ..
~C"':I.-=- ,.. .., .<l:~
..~~ -===- Q,
~:.d~~ , r::::"
... Y.L')+## ff' ~.;;...
-..:rJfJlr1."'~~~~
....~~J'f TE~"f.jl
#:'-10"
. .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
July 24, 2003
Mr. Donald K. Jackson
605 Edenville Avenue
Clearwater, FL 33764
RE: Application for Flexible Standard approval (FLS2oo3-06026) to rednce the side (south) setback
from 5 feet to one inch for an aluminum carport and driveway, as a residential infill project,
under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
Dear Mr. Jackson:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application to reduce the side (south) setback from 5 feet to one
inch for an aluminum carport and driveway, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of
Section 2-203.C.. at 605 Edenville Avenue. The proposal includes a carport/driveway addition in
association with an existing single-family dwelling. After a preliminary review of the submitted
documents, staff has determined that the application is complete.
We need to have your signature notarized when you come in for the Development Review Committee.
The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number:
FLS2003-06026.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 14,
2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal
Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater.
Please call Sheme Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior
to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your
representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have
regarding your application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the
meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or
jschodtl@clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely yours
~~~
J o~ schodtle~
Development Review Specialist
FILE
I
s:\Planning Departmenf\C D /JIStandard FleNending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Edville Rd 605 - Jackson (LMDR]lEdenville Rd 605
complete.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
WHITNEY GRAY, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HoYT HAMILTON, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILl. JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"