FLS2003-11058
. ,
CLWCoverSheet
.
.
FLS2003-11058
995 BAY ESPLANADE
Date Received: 11/20/2003
CRESPO, LOUIS E. & VIRGINIA M
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 238A
PAl D
OK. NO. ~Dt~.
DATE \ ~ ' \ ~I.,
\ \
NOV;;:: LUU3
C') :2 , "Cl "Cl . ~
0 '; 0 <: '; <:
0 < 0 <: <:
N 0\ i:lo 0 Q i:lo 0 Q .s.
--- C') .... .... "
0 = 0 <: = 0 <: "
N ...... = ...... .... = ...... .... ~
--- ...... = (I; e (I; "
...... =
...... 0
...... < <
~
00
~
M
~
o
o
o
o ~
0=
0=
O~
0=
O~
~.....
0.....
o QJ
M......
~ ~
~
..
::t:t:
......
C.
....
~
CJ
~
~
=
Z
-=
8
...
-<
ell
=
as
>
~
-;
.~
$:I
<l)
~
en
= ~
.s I
Co 'E
'C CZl
... ~
~ <l)
~ ~
ell
"Cl
C
U
=
CII
... N
E-< 0
=
z
~ ~
= CII
... U
....
-
ell
=
~
N
'"
N
......
-.r
C')
I
o
......
o
00
If>
o
......
......
I
C')
o
o
N
CZl
.....:l
~
-;
....
c
E-<
=
ell
....
-
ell
=
~
'"
-
C
Qi
5
;..,
eo:
~
"Cl
ell
..
'Cl
...
ell
~
~
c
::c
=
Z
=
...
I:
=
=
u
c
Z
....
=
=
c
...
...
<
'"
......
o
C')
=
Z
.:.:
=
CII
i:Q
~
en
...
...
....
CII
~
c(l
Z'
o
CZl
~
o
~
~
~
~
ffiz
~~
<.....:l
~~
u::E
<u
::E::E
"Cl
=
..c
li
~
~
()
Q)
..l:l
U
$:I
o
en
....
Q)
~
$:I
......
-;
-
o
E-o
-
I:
Qi
5
;..,
eo:
~
c:
a
~
a.
a.
ro
Q)
~
'0
Q)
E
a
u
Eg
~ Q)
o.~
ro a
..... -
, .Q !e
I-c:"
~ .Q Q)
a::: -.-
w~~
c..=a
<( a. c:
I-g-~
Oc:-
zro=
en.....::
-,E:::l
en_a
-0.>-
::r: .- "
I-Q)c:
u ro
@
ro-g
.!!l ~
.!!l '>
~@
Q)
.0
<l)
gp
i:l-.
<+-0
o
.~
c:
a
~
ro
.~
a.
a.
ro
.!!l
.c
I-
e
ORl GINAL
e
~Clearwater
-:~
(J~
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #: f!L:Jc/J.rr>.9 -11/J.5'P
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
~~ECE~\lED
w1S~ w
EAST:
[J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
[J SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
[J SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT Kt~t1~ftj~~~',~1~:~T
Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (~Jv:se(i \ IJo'b62jh'\ 'iW"'", i CI~
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
LUIS E. CRESPO AND VIRGINIA M. CRESPO
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS:
995 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
PHONE NUMBER:
(727) 446-9716
FAX NUMBER:
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
Same as above
(Must include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME:
HARRY S. CLINE, ESQ.
MAILING ADDRESS:
Post Office Box 1669. Clearwater, FI, 337S7-1nnQ
PHONE NUMBER:
(727) 441-8966
FAX NUMBER: (727) 442-8470
CELL NUMBER:
E-MAIL ADDRESS: hsc clw.macfar.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS:
995 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto
PARCEL NUMBER:
<?-?8 15-13464-274-0050
PARCEL SIZE: 132 x 110 = 14,520jsq.ft. per tax records
(acres, square feet)
PROPOSED USErS) AND SIZE(S): Single famil y residence to remain; adding garage facility
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):
Reduction of front setbacks to allow constructin of new garage
(include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
within 3' oLl::he right-of-way, consistent with the attached layout
L
Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
e
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
QlI SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
Q Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
SEE ATTACHED
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
SEE ATTACHED
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
SEE ATTACHED
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
SEE ATTACHED
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
SEE ATTACHED
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
on adjacent properties.
SEE ATTACHED
Q Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
SEE ATTACHED
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill project- City of Clearwater
e
e
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
SEE ATTACHED
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
SEE ATTACHED
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
SEE ATTACHED
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
SEE ATTACHED
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
SEE ATTACHED
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
SEE lXTTACHED
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and
4-202.A.21)
[J STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines:
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality:
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
[J COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
[J COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
,-------- ----
e
.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 12 copies;
o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
parking standards are approved;
o GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
o SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All dimensions;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per
Section 3-201 (D)(i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all on site and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
o SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabularform:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
o REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
.
.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
1:1 LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline;
Location, size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
1:1 REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11) (color rendering if possible);
1:1 IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
1:1 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residentiallnfill Project.
1:1 BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
1:1 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Yz X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
1:1 All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
1:1 All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing
1:1 Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
1:1 Reduced signage proposal (8 Yz X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-801.C)
1:1 Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801
C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 19th day of
November A.D. 20 03 me a~ by
HARRY S _ CLINE ,who is personally known as
p~~~ ~
identificati n.
Il~
lQlXrepresentative
A. O'Hearn
~ Ka
\."-. ) My Commission 00224974
., '" Expires July 20. 2007
Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
e CITY OF CLEARJlTER
AFFIDA VIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRA nON
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. 200 FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
I\!(PV 2.. () ?nn3
r\v ~ _ L....U
LUIS E. CRESPO AND VIRGINIA M. CRESPO
(Name of all property owners)
1. That UXKRIwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property:
995 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
(Address or General Location)
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
Reduction of front setbacks to allow construction of new garage within
3' of the riqht-of-way, consistent with the attached layout
(Nature of request)
3. That the undersigned (ilIas/have) appointed and (~s/do) appoint
Harry S. Cline, Esq.
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act
on the above described property;
5. That (iiwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certif
LUIS E. CRESPO
VIRGINIA M. CRESPO
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINEL LAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this '2. \ ~ day of
W\~f2L\A- ,~0> personally appeared L~lS -Ii.. +. V~~ltJIA It\. C26sPc who having been first duly sworn
depo,'" aod 'ays that he/,he My "ode"""od, the oooteo'" ofthe alllda'" that hel,he ';L
ry S. Cline
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
s: application forms/development review/Affidavit to Authorize Agent
HARRY S. CLINE
Noior; Public - Stote ofFICYida
My Cor"r::'sion Expires ApI 9. 2QO.4
~- ,"H.. :1 r':S"7's77J
tPll; -
. (
.
EXHIBIT "A':
Legal O.3criptlon (pee O.R Book 1116, Page 122 and O.R. Book 53~,
Page 1010):
All of lot 5 In Slock 2704 according to the plot of CARlOUE1.., 03
recorded In Plot Book 20, Page:; 60. 61 and 62 of Ule public records
of Plndla:s County. florida. Also that port of lot 04 in S<Jid Blod(
274- beginning at the intersection formed by Ule Northeasterly
boundary of Mandarin Way. with the boundary line between :laid Lobs
4- and 5, and from the Point of Beginning, run thence UorUlca:Jt,erly
aloog the boundary line between said lots 4- and 5; 110 feel:; U,ence
aloog tho Northoost<<1y boundary of :said lot +, 27.825 feet: thence
Southwesterly In a straight line to 0 point in UIO Northeasterly
boundary of Mandarin Way, which Is .30 feet along said boundary,
from the Point of Beginning; UUKlce SouUleastorly along :said
boundary to u'e Point of B~nnin9; Th. plot thus dna-ibed being
oUlerwise referred to as the .Southerly one-hali of said lot 4.
Also that port of lot 6 in said Block 27+ beginning at UIO
Inten<<tJoo formod by the Northeasterly boundary of MandOlin Way,
with tho boundary line between sold lots 5 and 6; and from this
Point of Beginnng. run thence Northoostcrly aloog the boundary
Ine betwO<<l said lots 5 and 6. 110 feet: thence aloog Ule
Northea3ter1y boundary of said lot 6, to a point midway between the
Northernmost corner of sold lot. and Ule Easternmost comef" of $O/d
lot; thence SouUlw~terly in 0 straight line to 0 point in the
Southwesteriy boundory of sold lot 6, , which Is 30 f~t o/oog sold
boundary, from the Point of Beginning. thence Northwesteciy oloog
said boundary to the Point of Beginning. The Plot thus descnbed
being othenrise referred to as tile -Northerly ooe-hali of said lot
6. TogethM' with 011 submerged land and riparian rights
appurtenant to u'e plot of land tIlus desorib<<l.
The Northeriy on_half (N 1/2) of the followirl9 d~cribod prOj)<<"ty.
lot Seven (7) and tile Southoosterly one-half (Se'ly 1/2) of lot Six
(6) in Blod< Two Hundred Seventy-four (2704), of CARLOOEl.. according
to the mq> or plot of said subdlvisloo, recorded in Plot Book
Twenty (20) on Pog~ 60, 61 and 62. of tile Public Records of
PineHas County. Florida, also described os follows:
That port of lot 6 In Block 274 of Corlouel Sub. os recorded In
Plot Book 20, Pagos 60/62. incl of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Fla. descrbod as: Be<Jin at the most Southerly comer of
:soid lot 6 and run thence Northwesterly aloog the W~ter1y line of
:soid lot 6. 30.0 ft.; tIlence Uoru,ea:sterly 112.-+ ft. to the center
Ine of the seawall. thence Southeasterly oIong the center line of
Ule soowoJl 21.21 fl to an intersection WiUI the extension of Ule
S04.Jtherfy line of said Lot 6. Olonoo Southwesterly oIoog u'e
Southerly line of $<lId lot 6, 112.4 fl more or less to P.O.8.:
aJ$o: That part of Lot 7 i1 Block 274 of Corlooel Sub. as recortled
in Plot Book 20, Pog" 60/62 !ne. of tho Public Records of Pinellas
County. Fla.. descnbed os: Begin at the most westeny comer of
said Lot 7 and run Ulence Southeasterly along Ule Westerly line of
:said lot 7, 15.0 ft.: thence NorUleasterly 112.-45 ft. to Ule center
lne of the seawall, Ulence Northwesterly along Ule center line of
Ulo seawall 10.5-4 ft. to on intersection with the extension of Ule
Northerly line of soid lot 7. Ull!lnce Southwe:;terly along tho
NOIiherfy line of so~:j Lot 7. 11204 fl more or less to P.O.B.
.
t\,' ij\! r;
I _ V I::'
.
.
I'
"
') . 'U3
APPLICANTS:
L VIS E. CRESPO and VIRGINIA M. CRESPO
ADDRESS:
995 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, FL 33767
A. Conditions which are imposed by the community development coordinator and the
community development board pursuant to a level one or a level two approval shall
ensure that:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale,
bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it s
located.
Bay Esplanade in this area is characterized by a small, curving street, with heavy
vegetation close to a road right-ol-way, and/or larger homes constructed close to
the right-ol-way. The proposal will be in harmony generally with the
neighborhood, and because of existing planting, and the road alignment, it will
not result in the deterioration of any vista opportunities along Bay Esplanade.
2. The proposed development shall not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and sue of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair
the value thereof.
All properties in the area are developed, and the trend is consistent with the
Applicant's plan to remodel and modernize an existing home, which is what has
been happening in the neighborhood over the past several years.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed development should have no impacts at all on the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the area.
4. The proposed development is designated to minimize traffic congestion.
The proposed construction should have no impacts on traffic congestion.
1------
.
.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The proposed development is an enhancement to the property and to the
neighborhood; no garage facilities exist for [his property at the present time and
this will allow the Applicant to store vehicles inside of a garage facility which is
not now available.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent
properties.
The garage is designed so the entry doors face onto the Applicant's property, and
not towards the street.
h: \data \aty\hsc \docs \crespo.a tt. doc
. .
APPLICANTS: LUIS E. CRESPO and VIRGINIA M. CRESPO
ADDRESS:
995 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, FL 33767
1,,'1\/ ~) 'J' L",;i;3
\\J II ,." vU
Seven (7) Residential Infill Project Criteria:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development
is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
The existing house, built many years ago, covers most of the building area on the
lot, but does not have an existing garage facility. The only location for a garage
is in the front of the house, requiring relief from the Code.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential
infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties. [Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of
the site with the improvements].
The residential infill project should be a positive event for the neighborhood,
since it will provide the owners the opportunity to put their automobiles inside a
garage rather than leaving them out in the driveway or on the street. The present
just/market value of the house as reflected by the Pinellas County Tax Assessor is
$1,465,600. The proposed development will enhance the property but the
economic impacts are unknown.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the
City of Clearwater.
The uses are permitted; the only question is location.
4. The uses or mix within the residential in fill project are compatible with
adjacent land uses.
The development is consistent with adjacent land uses and development. The area
is characterized by older homes, and the City of Clearwater has extended relief
incident to remodeling, new construction and garage installation in several
properties along this street, with no adverse impacts, and which Applicant
submits have in fact been enhancements to the neighborhood.
I
.
.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential
in fill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development.
As noted above, the creation of the garage facility will provide the opportunity to
park automobiles, removing them from open parking.
6. The design of the proposed residential in fill project creates a form and
function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
The construction is incident to a remodeling project for the entire site. Applicants
have retained the architectural firm of Cooper, Johnson, Smith Architects, Inc.,
Tampa, Florida, to prepare the plans for the overall development, so it is
anticipated that the property will be upgraded in addition to the construction of
the requested garage facility.
7. Flexibility in regard to low width, height and off-street parking are justified
by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
As noted above, at present the Applicants have no option except to park
automobiles in the open driveways or along the street. Construction of a garage
facility will provide the opportunity for closed storage, which will be an aesthetic
benefit to the neighborhood.
h: \da ta \aty\hsc \docs \crespo#2 .alt. doc
.
.
MACFARLANE FERGUSON & McMuLLEN
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
1501 SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE
LAKE LAND. FLORIDA 33S01
(S63) 680-9908 FAX (863) 683-2S49
400 NORTH TAMPA STREET. SUITE 2300
P.O. SOX 1531 (ZIP 33600
TAMPA. FLORIDA 33602
(SI3) 273-4200 FAX (SI3) 273-4396
625 COURT STREET
P.O. SOX 1669 (ZIP 33757)
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33756
,
.(727) 44'-8966 FAX (727) 442-S470
Clearwater
IN REPLY REFER TO:
November 20, 2003
Mr. Frank Gerlock, Planning Manager
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33757-4748
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Re: Owners: Luis E. and Virginia M. Crespo
Property: 995 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
Levell Residential Infill Application for Garage
Dear Chip:
Enclosed please find the following:
1. Original signed and notarized application
2. 12 copies of the original application
3. A check in the amount of$lOO.OO for the application fee
4. 13 copies oftbe Survey
5. 13 copies of the Site Plan
6. 13 copies of the Representative Front yard Setbacks
7. Certificate of Title.
Please give me a call regarding acceptability and timelines.
HSC:koh
Enclosure
cc: Dr. and Mrs. Luis E. Crespo
Cooper Jobnson Smith Architects, Jnc. [Attn: Mr. Stephen Smith]
November 20, 2003
Page 2
.
.
h: \da ta \a ty\hsc \corresp. '0 3 \ger I oc k. n 06. doc
.
.
MACFARLANE FERGUSON & McMuLLEN
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
1501 SOUTH FLORIDA AVENUE
LAKELAND. FLORIDA 33801
(863) 680-9908 FAX (863) 683-2849
400 NORTH TAMPA STREET. SUITE 2300
P.O. BOX 1531 (ZIP 33601)
TAMPA. FLORIDA 33602
(813) 273-4200 FAX (813) 273-4396
625 COURT STREET
P.O. BOX 1669 (ZIP 33757)
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33756
(727) 441-8966 FAX (727) 442-8470
IN REPLY REFER TO,
Clearwater
November 19, 2003
.-:CE'VE~
NOV 2 0 2U03
City of Clearwater
State of Florida
CERTIFICA TE OF TITLE
The undersigned, HARRY S. CLINE, a licensed attorney at law, does hereby certify that
as of the date of this certificate that fee simple title to the property described in O.R. Book 10696, page
2271, public records of Pine lIas County, Florida, which property is described in the attached Exhibit "A",
is presently vested in LUIS E. CRESPO and VIRGINIA M. CRESPO.
-Q'ft1
EXECUTED this ~_-- day of November, 2003.
MACF ARLANE FERGUSON & McMULLEN
't~ /
HarrY\ clillc
By:
h:\data\aty\hsc\corresp.'03\crespocert.n 19.doc
. ~,)
99-342893 OOCT8KI91o~ii p~ :ii~MI
PIN E L \ i1\~1 \\M \\\11 11\11\1\111\1111\\11 \1111111\ \111
. I
PREPARED BY kND RETURN TO:1
HARRY S. CLINE, Esquire
Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen
625 Court Street, Suite 200
Post Office Box 1669 (33757)
Clearwater, Florida 33756
KARLEEN F. DE.R, lURK OF COURI
F' UIELLAS CoUN ' DRIM
~ 15-
J> 51fJ -
3C150346 10-19-l'j'j'j 16: 45: 3'~
51 DED-LUIS CRESPO
0000000000
IU: BK:
RECORD ING 003 PAGES
DOC STAMP - 00219
SPG:
1
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S
TOTAL:
P CHECK AMT.TENDERED:
CHANGE:
BV -(f)-- DEPUTV CLERK
DEED ~
.d,-
THIS INDENTURE, made this ~ day of October, 1999, between
JOHN W. STULL, of Pinellas County, Florida, as Personal Represent-
ative of the Estate of KATHERINE A. STULL, Deceased, Party of the
First Part, whose mailing address is 1010 Bruce Avenue, Clearwater,
FL 33767, and LUIS E. CRESPO AND VIRGINIA M. CRESPO, his wife,
Party of the Second Part, whose mailing address is 995 Bay
Esplanade. Clearwater Beach, FL 33767.
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, by her Last Will and Testament, the said KATHERINE A.
STULL did appoint JOHN W. STULL, as Personal Representative of her
;)\1::,,: ,_ Last Will and Testament; and
" . :'i-C-W
Stj-'I3-b D
;',': '--'--- Florida, on February 17, 1998; and
WHEREAS, said decedent did die a resident of pinellas County,
;i
WHEREAS, on February 26, 1998, the Last Will and Testament of
\'.,,/
I
"-. ...._.._.~
r-;..' _.__ jid decedent was duly admitted to Probate in the Circuit Court for
r',' ,$' 15~ Opinellas County, Florida, Probate Division, in Probate Number 98-
f-1248-ES3, and on March 9, 1998, JOHN W. STULL was appointed and
qualified as Personal Representative of said estate;
NOW THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH, that in pursu,ance of the
authority granted him in said decedent's Last Will and Test~ment,
and the Florida Statutes, and in consideration of the sum of Ten
Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations to him in hand
paid by Party of the Second Part, receipt whereof is hereby acknow-
ledged, the said Party of the First Part, as the duly qualified and
acting Personal Representative aforesaid, does hereby grant, bar-
gain sell and convey to the said Party of the Second Part, the
following described property situate in Pinella County, Florida,
to-wit:
EXHIBIT
fA ,\
~
D
B
,JA
3
EPG:
$15.
$5,'j43.1
$5,958.1
$5,959.
$.1
.
.
PINELLAS COUNTY FLA.
OFF.REC.8K 10696 PG 2272
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BY
REFERENCE.
Subject to 1999 real estate taxes, restrictions, reserva-
tions and easements of record.
Parcel #: 32/28/15/13464/274/0040
Social Security No: 266-22-8010
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said Party of the Second
Part, their heirs and assigns, in as full and ample manner as the
same was possessed and enj oyed by the said decedent in her
lifetime.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Party of the First Part, as Personal
Representative aforesaid, has hereunto set his hand and seal the
day and year first above written.
In the Presence of:
~u~ (SEAL)
JOHN W. STULL, as Personal
Representative of the Estate of
KATHERINE A. STULL, Deceased
:~ 0..,,))
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
BEFORE ME, the undersigned officer, duly authorized to take
acknowledgments and administer oaths, personally appeared JOHN W.
STULL, to me personally known or who has produced
as identification and who did take an
oath, who being by me first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is
the Personal Representative of the above-referenced estate, and
that he executed the foregoing deed as said Personal Representative
and as his act and deed for the purposes therein expressed.
WITNESS my hand and official seal at Clearwater, said county
and state, this /5 day of October, 1999.
~ LAUmEANNSlOCKWEll ~~14
Nolary Public, Slale of Flonda Print Name
My Comm. Ex~ires Jan. 6, 2002
No. CC702496 My Commission Expires:
H: \ DATA \REL \BOLLE\STULL. PRO
-2-
.
P IHELLAS co. FLA.
OFF.REC.8K 10898 PG 2273
EXHIBIT
"Al~
Legal Description (per O.R. Book 1116. Page 122 and O.R. Book 53<<,
Page 1010):
All of Lot 5 In Block 27-Jaccordlng to the plat of CARLOUEL. 03
recorded In Plat Book 20. Pages 60. 61 and 62 ot the public records
ot PlneHas County. Florida. Also that part ot Lot 4 In said Blode
274 beginllin9 at the intersectioo formed by the Northe<lsterly
boundary of lAandarln Way. with the b~ndary line between :sold l.ots
4 and 5. and from the Point of Beginning. run thence Northeast,erly
alon9 the boundary line between said Lots 4 and 5; 110 feet; thence
a1on9 the Northeasterly boundary of S<lid Lot -J, 27.825 feet; thence
Southwesterly in a straight line to a point in the Northeasterly
boundary of lAandarin Way, which Is 30 teet along said boundary.
from the Point of Beginning; theoce Southeasterly along S<lid
boundary to the Point of Beginning; The plot thus described being
otherwise referred to as the .Southerly one-halt" of S<lid Lot 4.
Also that part ot Lot 6 in said Block 274 beginning <It the
intersection form&d by the Northeasterly boundary of t.4andarln W<Jy.
with the boundary line between said Lots 5 and 6; ond from this
Point of Beginning. run thence Northeasterly oloog the boundary
line betweon said Lots 5 and 6. 110 feet; thence al009 the
Northeasterly boundary of sold Lot 6. to a point midway between the
Northernmost comer of sold Lot. and the Easternmost comer of $O/d
Lot; thence Southw=terly in a straight line to a point In the
Southwesterly boundory of sold Lot 6. . which Is 30 feet al009 S<lld
boundary. from the Point of Beginning. thence Northwesterly o/ong
said boundary to the Point of Beginning. The Plot thus descnbed
being otherwise referred to as the .Northerly ooe-hol(' of lKIid Lot
6. T0gether with all submef9ed land and riparian rights
appurtenant to the plot of land thus descnbed.
The Northerly oo~half (N 1/2) of the following described prop<<ty.
Lot SeYeo (7) and the Southeasterly one-half (Se'ly 1/2) of Lot Six
(6) in BIO<:k Two Hundred Seventy-four (274). of CARLOUEl. aecordiC1l~
to the mq:> or plot of soid subdivision. recorded In Plat Book
Twenty (20) on Pag= 60. 61 and 62. of the Public Records of
Pinellas County, florida. also descnbed as follows:
That port of Lot 6 in Block 274 of Carlouel Sub. as recorded In
Plat Book 20. Pages 60/62. loci. of the Public Records of Plnelros
County. Fla. descrbed as: Begin at the most Southerly comer of
said Lot 6 and run thence Northwesterly along the Westerly line of
said Lot 6. 30.0 ft.; thence Northeasterly 112.... ft. to the center
Ine of the seawall, thence Southeasterly along the center line of
the seawall 21.21 fl to an Intersection with the extension of the
Southerly line of said Lot 6. Uleoce Southwesterly along the
Southerly line of said Lot 6. 112.4 fl more or less to P.O.B.;
also; That part of Lot 7 il Block 274 of Corlooel Sub. as recorded
In Plat Book 20. Pages 60/62 inc. of the Public Records of Pinellas
County. Fla., descnbed as: Begin at tM most westerly comer ()f
said Lot 7 and run thence Southeasterly along the Westerly line ot
said Lot 7, 15.0 ft.; thence Northeasterly 112.45 ft. to the center
line of the seawall, thence Northwesterly along the center line of
the 3eowafl 10.5;J f1. to an Intersectloo with the extension of the
Northerly line of said Lot 7. thence Southwesterly along the
NOIiheriy line of so~:j Lot 7. 112.4 fl more or less to P.O.B.
~,,'ff"Jrq,
4~.~'(.!}.LoF rh't~~
\{~ 1)","U~'TT'7~_
~!".., ~T~~_~";.
'>f~,' \ I, ~ C>..
'" ~'ttlt,,' I ',,' ~....."
~C":J - - <:c"
':r:::~ ~:
..~ ~ -=-"'''- ;:;::.~
"'~.A'"~--'--- .'f"'.'~'
~..r$.F';;;;;'."~~~\\
.........-')1TE~"jjt
"-'II'
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
October 28,2004
Mr. Harry Cline, Esq.
P. O. Box 1669
Clearwater, FL 33757-1669
RE: Development Order regarding time extension for case FLS2003-11 058 at 995 Bay Esplanade.
Dear Mr. Cline:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On December 23,2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed
your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the front (west) setback
from 25 feet to 3 feet to a proposed garage addition, as a residential infill project in association with a
single-family residence located at 995 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. The
DRC unanimously recommended approval of the application with the following two conditions:
1. That the proposed garage addition must be attached to the primary structure; and
2. That the Impervious Surface Ratio calculations be provided prior to issuance of building permit.
The application was valid for one year to expire on December 26, 2004. Your request for a one-year
time extension has been approved with the same, two conditions. An application for a building
permit shall be made within one year of the time extension approval (December 26, 2005). All
required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the date
ofthe building permit.
Please remember that a building permit and impact fees will be required prior to the construction of
the project. Should you have any questions, please call the John Schodtler, Planner I at 727-562-4604.
Very truly yours,
~
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIStandard FlexlInactive or Finished CaseslBay Esplanade 995 - Crespo (LMDR) - Approved\Bay Esplanade 995 - time
extension. doc
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COM~IISSIOI'o:ER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
,
OCT-~5-2004 16:33
MRCFRRLRNE FERGUSON
727 442 8470
P.02
MAOFARLANE FERGUSON & McMuLLEN
ATTORNEYS AND COuNSEL.ORS AT LAW
1901 SOUTH F"LOJ;ICA AVENUE
LAKE-LAND. FLO~tDA aaeoa
/SE3) 6S0.g~ .....10; ("301 O:OIl~-""4"
ONe TAMPA CITY CENTER. SUITE 2000
201 NOR1'H F'R'-"N&oCil.l,... ST~e:;r;T
P,O, eOl< 1;<'" (~I.. ,,:!ISO I I
TAf't'P'A. P"L.OIZl'IOA .:!I.:!I60.e:
(8,:!I) 1!?:!I_4200 FAX /8131273-4386
825 COllRT STREET
P. O. BOX 10.1159 <::C::U::lI ';';\7!!!l.'7'
I;;I..EARW...1'ei!l, ~LOr:lIOA :!I3758
(7i'7) .........-OSitae FAX. ("27) .d...e.S470
IN ~ii:Pt.,.Y Rt::....I::R TO:
WWW.fTlf...IO\lIilI.i;QITl
':MA)L, InroCmfmlegal.com
October 25, 2004
Mr. John Schodtler
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33757-4748
VIA FAX # 562-4576
Re: Dr. and Mrs. Luis Crespo, 995 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
Dear John:
As I think your files will reflect, the City approved a proposed garage addition for the
above-referenced property in December, 2003.
Dr. and Mrs, Crespo have not yet fmalized the plans and hirck contractor for this project.
Please pull your file and let me know if we can continue this or extend the approval for one (1)
additional year, and if that is in fact possible, please accept this as a formal request for a one (1)
year extension.
I shall look forward to hearing back from you.
Sincerely yours,
HSC:koh
cc: Dr. and Mrs. Luis Crespo
h:\d!lt!l\at)'\hsc\corresp. '04~chodIler.o2S, doc
TOTRL P. 02
OCT-25-2004 16:33
"
MRCFRRLRNE FERGUSON
727 442 8470
P.01
MACFARLANE J'ERGUSON , McMULLEN
Ait~yS , COUNSELORS AT lAW'
moa:lMi:B~ BANK IIUILDINO
625 COURT S~I~/8U%~ 200
P. O. aox 1669 (ZIP ~37571
CLEARWATER, II'LOIUDA 33756
(727) 441-9966
FAX 'l'BANSMITTAL F01U4
DATE:
OotOber 25, 2004
NOMBEa OF PAGES:
(Including cover page)
7
ATTENTION:
JOHN SCHODTLER
FI1U4 ~:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
FAX NO. :
562-4576 TELEPHONE NO.: 562~4567 x 2667
Direct #: 562-4604 x 2
E-mail: John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com
FROM: HARRY S. CLINE
FAX NO. : (727) 442-8470
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
IF YOU EXPERIENCE PROBltEMS IN RECP.:IVING,
PLEASE CALL OUR OFFICE AT (727) 441-8966
THE lNFORMATION CONTAINED IN tHIS FACSIMILE N~SSAGE IS ATTORNEY-CLI~NT PRIVILEGEC AND CONFIDENTI~ INFORMATION
INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USJi: OF THE ADDRESSEE. It THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE rs NOT THE INTENOi:D ll,l;:CIPIENT,
COMMUNI~TION OF THIS MATERIA~ IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF you HAVg RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERaOR. PLZASE
IMMEDIAT"t.y NOTIFY US BY T..LEPllONE (COLLECT IF N~CESSARYI AND RmT\1/UIT THE ORIGINAL MESS./IGE TO US AT THE ABOVE
ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU.
\
December 26 2003
Mr. Harry Cline, Esq.
P. O. Box 1669
Clearwater, FL 33757-1669
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-11 058 at 995 Bay Esplanade.
Dear Mr. Cline:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On December 23, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed
your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the front (west) setback
from 25 feet to 3 feet to a proposed garage addition, as a residential infill project in association with a
single-family residence located at 995 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. The
DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Condition for Approval:
1. That the proposed garage addition must be attached to the primary structure; and
2. That the Impervious Surface Ratio calculations be provided prior to issuance of building permit.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above one condition. The approval is
based on and must adhere to the site plan and application received November 20,2003.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (December 26, 2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
-.
December 26, 2003
Mr. Cline - Page Two
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review
Specialist, at 727 -562-4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myclearwater.com. * Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo (LMDR)\Bay Esplanade 995
Development Order.doc
.
.
(
CITY OF CLEARWATER
LoNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REviEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 26 2003
Mr. Harry Cline, Esq.
P. O. Box 1669
Clearwater, FL 33757-1669
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-11058 at 995 Bay Esplanade.
Dear Mr. Cline:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On December 23, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed
your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the front (west) setback
from 25 feet to 3 feet to a proposed garage addition, as a residential infill project in association with a
single-family residence located at 995 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. The
DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Condition for Approval:
1. That the proposed garage addition must be attached to the primary structure; and
2. That the Impervious Surface Ratio calculations be provided prior to issuance of building permit.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above one condition. The approval is
based on and must adhere to the site plan and application received November 20,2003.
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (December 26,2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not
change with successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
BRIAN]. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
~ December 26, 2003
Mr. Cline - Page Two
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review
Specialist, at 727-562-4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myc1earwater.com. * Make Us Your Favorite!
Ql~
~)
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard F1ex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo (LMDR)\Bay Esplanade 995
Development Order.doc
..
I
.
.
DRC Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Applicant:
Address:
December 23, 2003
FLS2003-11058
Mr. & Mrs. Louis Crespo
995 Bav Esplanade
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DRAFT STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Standard Development approval Flexible Standard Development approval
for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 3 feet to a proposed garage
addition, as a residential infill project in association with a single-family residence
located at 995 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
EXISTING ZONINGILAND USE: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR), Residential Urban Classification,
(RU)
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single Family residential
Single-Family residential
ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES:
North:
West:
East:
South:
Preservation - Intercoastal Waterway
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
Single-family residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIA TE VICINITY:
Single-family dwellings with greatly reduced from setbacks dominate the
immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
0.33 acres (14,520 s.f.) located on the north side of Bay Esplanade approximately 200 feet west of Bruce Avenue. The
parcel is located within a residentially developed area of single-family homes. The proposed approximate 900 square
foot garage addition is to allow for indoor vehicle storage. The single-family dwelling will remain the same height.
The site has an existing circular driveway along the south property line.
The proposed residential addition will maintain the established reduced front setback that is characteristic to the
surrounding vicinity. The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Low
Medium Density Residential District.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-
9B.A) and Detached Dwelling, Residential Infill criteria (Section 2-203.C) have been met.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
S:\Planning Departmeni\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo
(LMDRJ-Bay Esplanade 995 Staff Report. doc
.. ft . .
STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL:
STANDARD REQUIREDI EXISTING PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
PERMITTED
7.5 dwelling units One dwelling One dwelling [X]
unit unit
0.65
LOT AREA 14,520 square feet 14,520 square 14,520 square [X]
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH 132 feet 132 feet 132 feet [X]
(minimum)
FRONT 25 Feet 28.7 Feet 3 Feet [X]
SETBACK
REAR 25 feet N/A N/A [X]
SETBACK
SIDE SETBACK 5 feet 9.83 feet 9.83 feet [X]
PARKING
SPACES
2 per unit
2+ spaces
2+ spaces
[X]
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR DETACHED DWELLINGS IN LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(Section 2-203.B):
1.a.
Front setback:
A determination of the front setback shall
consider the extent to which existing
structures in the neighborhood have been
constructed to a regular or uniform setback
from the right-of-way;
Consistent Inconsistent
[X] [ ]
b.
The reduction in front setback will not
adversely affect adjacent property values;
[X] [ ]
c.
The reduction in front setback is consistent
with neighborhood character; and
[X] [ ]
d.
The reduction in front setback results in an
efficient house layout.
[X] [ ]
GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
S:\Planning DepartmenflC D BlStandard FleXlPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo
(LMDRJ\fJay Esplanade 995 Staff Report. doc
l
.
.
Consistent Inconsistent
1.
Development of the land will be in
harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage,
density and character of adjacent
properties.
[X]
[ ]
2.
Development will not hinder or discourage
development and use of adjacent land and
buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
[X]
[ ]
3.
Development will not adversely affect the
health or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
[X]
[ ]
4.
Development is designed to mImmIze
traffic congestion.
[X]
[ ]
5.
Development is consistent with the
community character of the immediate
vicinity.
[X]
[ ]
6.
Design of the proposed development
rmmmIzes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts on adjacent properties.
[X]
[ ]
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 23, 2003. The
Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development application for reduction to
the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 3 feet to a proposed garage addition, as a residential infill project in association
with a single-family residence located at 995 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.on the following
bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Detached Dwelling per Section 2-203.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per
Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Department\C D /!\Standard FleX\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo
(LMDRfIlJay Esplanade 995 Staff Report.doc
.
.
f,,'ITI~~~
..~~~LOF Tift. ~......+
\..~~\ 1)"'J'u"~~~,,,,
\!,:,~j ~",,+'r...
~~.., ~~~
~Q~ ,\1/", . _..
~ ~:::-._"'':....
..~~==':: c:::t:lil
..~ _MM. MM.. .5)lil
"I"' : . ~~..~. ~~
':.~.A'....~-::=~.... ,'r-.'-"
-.:r..JPJ;:;;'t"~~.."\
"'......... I'f TE~t .f..
##"11'"
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PIANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 12, 2003
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 995 Bay Esplanade (FLS2003-11058).
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 995 Bay Esplanade, the City of Clearwater Planning Department
gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The
request is for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 3 feet to a proposed garage addition, as
a residential infill project in association with a single-family residence located at 995 Bay Esplanade,
under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
On December 23,2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staft)
will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community
Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a
Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application.
The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application.. You may phone me at
727-562-4604 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments
to be considered in the City's review of the application.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners
within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the
Development Review Committee meeting (December 23, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an
appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through
the City's website: www.c1earwater-fl.comor my direct e-mail addressisischodtl@clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
~r~k..-.
J ohii Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D /!\Standard Fle:i\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\DEC 2J\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo (LMDRNJay
Esplanade 995 Notification Letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIOKER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTIE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 1, 2003
Mr. Harry Cline, Esq.
P. O. Box 1669
Clearwater, FL 33757-1669
RE: Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 3
feet to a proposed garage addition, as a residential infill project in association with a single-family
residence located at 995 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
Dear Mr. Cline:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 3
feet to a proposed garage addition, as a residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is mostly
complete.
The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number:
FLS2003-11058.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December 23,
2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal
Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please
call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the
meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as
applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your
application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4604.
Sincerely yours,
~~~~
J o~ Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\Standard FleX\Pending CasesV - Up for the Next DRC\DEC 2J\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo (LMDRNJay
esplanade 995 complete letter. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BII,LJONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
Map Output
.
.
Page 1 of 1
.c::l Af/fJ~(2.~ 1'l> 136 e usss -n-\ArJ 25'
r fZD~ ret6A6\'-_
http://imsweb 1 /serv let/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceN ame=O VMap&Client V ersion=... 12/1 /2003
NDV-25-2003
15:11
~aCFarlane Ferguson Clw
MACFARLANE FERGUSON
.
&: McMTJLLEN
P.01/03
\
ATTORNEYS ~ COUNSE~OR9 AT ~w
INTERVEST BANK BU1~~1~a
6Z5 COURT STRII./eV4T~ 200
P. O. BOX 166' (~X~ 33757)
C~~WAT~~, PLORInl 33756
(727) 4011-8966
FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM
DATE;
November 21, 2003
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(Including cover page)
ATTENTION:
FRANK · \ CHI P I I GERLOCK
FIRM NAME:
CITY OF CLBARWATER
FAX NO.:
562-4576
TELEPHONE NO.
562-4567
.1. J7
FROM:
HARRY S. CLINE
FAX NO.:
(727) 442-8470
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
IF YOU EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS IN RECEIVING,
PLEASE CALL OUR OFFICE AT (727) 441-8966
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND OO~.%~!NTIAL INFORMATION
INT=lm ONLY FOR 'litE T,,1S.Il: 01" THE AlJD.tl.ll:SSll:~. n' Till!: R21l!IER OF THIS MllSSAGE IS NOT THE IN'l'=EO RECU>IrnT,
COMMUNICATION OF THIS ~TERIAL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS OOl'l~UCAT!ON IN ERROR, PLEASE
IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE (COLr..EC7 lOP NECESSARY) ~ RSTUIl).! nlE OJUGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE
APDRESS VIA 'I'~E u.s. ~OetAL $S.tl.V!CE. THANK YOu.
NDV-25-2003 16:11
~aCFarlane Ferguson Clw
e
P.02/03
'"
MACFARLANE FERGUSON & McMuLLEN
ATTOf:lNE:YS ANO COUN5E:I..ORS AT LAW
11101 SOUTH ,LORIOA AVENUE
LIII(ELIINO. "LORIOA 3380.
(863) 680.S908 FAX (a8ll) I!lS.3-~04\)
"'00 NORTH TAMPA STREET, SUITE 2300
P.O. 80X I!!~l i:/:IP 33eOll
TAi'4PA, FLORIDA ll3eO~
(SI31273.4200 FAX IS'llI2:t3-431111!l
se!! COURT STREET
P.O. BOX IS89 (ZIP .3371371
CLEARWATER, ,LORIOA 33715S
('12:t1441-8eea FAX (727) 442.B0470
IN 1ll:I'~V RtFtFl TA'}
'.,; eaxwater
November 25, 2003
Mr, Frank Gerlock, Planning Manager
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 33757-4748
VIA FAX # 562-4576
Re: Owners: Luis E. and Virginia M, Crespo
Property: 995 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater, FL 33767
Case #: FLS 2003-11058
Dear Chip:
Supplementing the above-referenced application, I would ask the City to take note of the
following "variances" granted in the immediate neighborhood, involving the front setbacks:
1. FL 99-10-20: Meeting date 12/14/99; property located at 980 Bay
Esplanade. This property, located essentially across the street~ involved a request for
Flexible Development approval for a reduced front setback from 25' to 2.1' to allow for
garage construction. I would point out that the request at 980 Bay Esplanade was more
troublesome, because the garages opened directly to the street, whereas the Crespo
application involves garage doors opening onto private property.
2. V 97-44, Application of Phillip H and Michele Eaton: meeting date
7/24/97; property located at 979 Bay Esplanade. This application was for construction of
a retaining wall with a fence on top of it~ right on the front property line, which was
approved.
I am in the process of getting photos of the house and the area and will provide
them to you within the next several days.
NDV-25-2003 16:12
411fcFarlane Ferguson Clw
.
P.03/03
. ..
November 25, 2003
Page 2
Thank you for your continued help and I shall look forward to hearing back from
you relative to staff comments and the next meeting.
Sincerely,
HSC/say
00: Luis Crespo
-,,,-<
h:\dala\my\hsc\cOITeSp. '03\gcrlock.n21.doc
TOTAL P. 03
.., ., .
9JJiwHni/t @
--.. -=---~ ~
&""",~-, ~
I ·
..... ',;;',
. -
25191 U.S. Highway 19 North - Clearwater, FL 33763
Phone: (727) 797-7070 -1-800-40-ROLLS - Fax: (727) 726-0861
www.dimmitt.com
December 17, 2003
Mr. John Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
City of Clearwater
Planning Department
100 So. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Fl. 33758
rli) 'I" r~ n \1f7 re rm
Uu ~::; 7 ~~u; ~
PLAs-.NING & DEVELOPMENT S\lCt)
CIlYOF ClEARWATER
Re: Notice QfFiling Of An Application For Flexible Standard Development
Approval At 995 Bay Esplanade (FLS2003-11 058)
'Dear Mr. Schodtler:
Doreen and I would like to offer our support for the application
submitted by our neighbors at 995 Bay Esplanade. It is our Wlderstanding that
flexible standards have been developed by the Planning Department to permit
new constmction with smaller setbacks if this is in keeping with the existing neigh-
borhood character and pennits a better use of the property.
As long time I"esidents, we believe it is more in keeping with the
, character of our neighborhood to have a $maller set back at the front yard,
rather than the 25 foot standard. This aOoft's better use of the lots in our
neighborhood which are generally rather shallow in depth.
With kindest regards, I am
~<-l~ ~
Richard R. Dimmitt
TIM
m
80 Years Serving The Needs of The Automotive Public
ZOO~
19S09ZLLZL XVd Z1:10 COOZIL1/Z1
9JJ~ ~
.~~
..-
25191 U.S. Highway 19 North - Clearwater, FL 33763
Phone: (727) 797-7070 -1-800-40-Ro. LS - Fax: (727) 726-0861
www.dimmitt D~E!!Jc U'~7n20W03re r1f1
FAX TRANSACTION WJ
PLAl"~,TYO& FDetEVEElOPMENT S\'C~
ARWATER
DATE
/J..- /7--0'3
;z...
PAGES INCLUDING COVER
TO: . r-ykLJ} k
COMPANY:
FAX NUMBER:
Sfi,')'- LJ-51&
BUS. NUMBER:
FROM: PAT CLOUGHSEY - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
FAX NUMBER: (727) 726-0861
BUS. NUMBER: (727) 797-7070
EXT. 210
. i
COMMENTS
80 Years Serving The Needs of The Automotive Public
100~
19909ZLLZL XVd Zl:10 COOZIL1/Z1
.
.
l... .
~ ~~~LOF TH~
~ ~
~~~~.
, C":t~~~\~~
. 'r::~ ::::= ~,'"
tl\1"-..\ - :s~
~~- ~~
~li1Jj\~>>
CITY OF CLEARWATER
December 12, 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4?~ WATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUIL9tNt~'lOMYRTI.E AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
'1EU:PHONE(721) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
Dt.\- '/ \J. 1<.J<.J~ ~_
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 995 Bay Esplanade (FLS2003-11058).
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 995 Bay Esplanade, the City of Clearwater Planning Depaltment
gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The
request is for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 3 feet to a proposed garage addition, as
a residential infill project in association with a single-family residence located at 995 Bay Esplanade,
under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
On December 23,2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staft)
will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community
Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a
Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying t!le application.
The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application.. You may phone me at
727-562-4604 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments
to be considered in the City's review of the application.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners
within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the
Development Review Committee meeting (December 23,2003). An appeal must be filed, including an
appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through
the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.comor my direct e-mail addressisischodtl@clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
~'~~
John Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Departmen^C D B\Standard FleNending CasesV - Up for the Next DRC\DEC 23\Bay Esplanade 995 - Crespo (lMDR]\Bay
Esplanade 995 Notification Letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-Cmli~SSIONEI~ WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER' * BILL)ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
LL
o
>-
f-
o
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor
CLEARW A TER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: lda:'Cl Cl;n~ ~
FAX: ~2.. - c:g 4--Z0
Phone:
FROM: :-)~() ~ Phone:
DATE: L z....-ll 'll 03 SUBJECT: ftS2.-co 3 - l\ b S~
~ - t:::{2.C.- L..o"MM ~13.
MESSAGE:-=C +r\~c9 -+h~ ~~il on lfJUt afpJl"~
hI- ~a.r;o~~ 'I~o-i ~~
So I -- o.r~ -H;~ ~---- ~ -C~ . :...~s
6-f' -t.k ~ C(2..E.'S'f' 0 ~ ,0 0. ~t;.:L G::. ~9 'S
\3(J upt~ ..
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)
.
.
December 19,2003
Mr. Cline,
The following are comments generated from the preliminary Development Review Committee on
December 19, 2003. Please be prepared to address these and any other comments generated at the
scheduled Development Review Meeting for 745 Bay Esplanade on December 23,2003 at 9:45 a.m. The
city requests that yourself or a representative be present for the Development Review Meeting at 100
South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater, FL on the second floor of the Municipal Services building. Please
call and verify your time with Sherrie Nicodemus at 562-4582 before December 23rd. I look forward to
meeting with you.
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
1. Parks and Recreation:
a) No Comments
2. Storm water:
a) No Comments
3. Traffic Eneineerine:
a) No Comments
4. General Ene:ineerine:
a) No Comments
5. Plannine:
a) The site plan indicates an existing two-car garage, however the General Applicability
criteria #5 has been addressed as follows, "no garage facilities exist.. ." Please explain;
b) Please provide Building Elevations at DRC on December 23; and
c) Please provide existing and proposed Impervious Surface Ratio calculations.
6. Solid Waste:
a) No Comments
7. Land Resources:
a) No Comments
8. Fire:
a) No Comments
9. Environmental:
a) No Comments
10. Community Response:
a)
11. Landscapine:
a) No Comments
Sincerely,
John Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
'" Pinellas County Property Ap.er Information: 3228 15 13464274.
Page 2 of 4
32 / 28 / 15 /
13464 / 274 / 0050
18-Dec-2003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:34:47
Ownership InforMation Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
CRESPO, LUIS E
CRESPO, UIRGINIA H
995 BAV ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER fL 33767-1004
COMparable sales value as Prop Addr: 995 BAV ESPLANADE
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Trac t : 260.02
sales froM 2001 - 2002:
1. 751. 200 Sale Date OR BOOk/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/ IMp
Plat InforMation 10/1.999 10,696/2,271 849,000 (U) I
1934: Book 020 Pgs 060-062 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 1. 461. 500 HOMestead: 25,000 Ownership % 1.000
SAUE-OUR-HOHES CAP Historic : 0 Use %: 1.000
Assessed/Cap: 913,000 Tax ExeMpt %: .000
Other ExeMp t : 0
Taxable: 888,000 Agricultural: 0
2003 Tax InforMation Land InforMation
District: CW Seawall: VES Frontage: Bay
Clearwater View:
03 Millage: 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 20,499.57
1) 132 x 110 10,100.00 132.00 F
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-HoMes 4) o x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes wi 11 be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
33,161. 75 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exeMptions, Total Land Value: 1,386,528
2003 taxes will be :
33,738. 87
Short Legal CARLOUEL SUB BLK 274, LOTS 5 3: 6 3:
Description SE'LV 1/2 OF LOT 4 3: THAT PT OF LOT 7 DESC BEG HOST
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.2&s=3&u=0&p=32+ 2... 12/1812003
, Pinellas County Property Ap.er Information: 3228 15 13464274.
Page 3 of 4
32 / 28 / 15 / 13464 / 274 / 0050 :01
18-Dec-Z003 JiM SMith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:34:48
Residential Card 01 of 1 Prop Use: Z10 Land Use: 01 Living Units: 1
IMp Type: Single FaNily Prop Address: 995 BAY ESPLANADE
Structural Elements
Foundation
Floor SysteM
Exterior Wall
Roo f FraMe
Roof Cover
Continuous ""all
Slab on Grade
ConcBk stucco/Reclad
Gable-Hip
Cone Tile/Avg Htl
Quality
Year Built
Effective Age
Heating
Cooling
Fixtures
Other Depreciation
Functional Depreciation
EcononoMic Depreciation
Above Average
1.955
15
Central Duct
Cooling (Central)
11
o
o
o
# Stories
Floor Finish
Interior Finish
Z. 0
Crpt/HdTI/HdHar/Prqt
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1. 00 3.141 7) .00 0
2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 753 8) .00 0
3) Open Porch . ZO 558 9) .00 0
4) Garage .35 512 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) .00 0 12) .00 0
Residential Extra Features
Description DiMensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) DOCK 450 15.00 450 0 5.400 1. 996
2) FIREP LAC E LG 5.000.00 1 0 Z.OOO 1.955
3) FIREP LAC E AUG Z. 500.00 1 0 1.000 1. 955
4) POOL 15.000.00 1 0 11. 100 1.994
5) SPA/JAC/HT 6.000.00 1 0 4.440 1.994
6) ENCLOSURE ZZ56 Z.Z5 Z.Z56 0 3.760 1.994
TOTAL RECORD VA L U E : Z7.700
Map With 2003 Sales (Red), 2002 Sales (Green), 2001 Sales (Blue)
~~[I][f]~~
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi -scr3 ?o= 1 &a= 1 &b= 1 &c= 1 &r=.2&s=3&u=0&p=32+ 2... 12/18/2003