FLS2003-11055
~-.
CL WCoverSheet
.
.
nnl(:, ~f.AL
"~;\.,7 ,\
"". I'"
FLS2003-11055
745 BAY ESPLANADE
Date Received: 11/19/2003
ANDREW & LILY HUPP
ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR
LAND USE: RU
ATLAS PAGE: 249A
RECEIVED
PAID
CK.NO. 353q
DATE \
NOV 1 9 2003
DE,Pl\RTMENT
CITY OF CLEI\RVVATER
M ~ 'a. '0 0 '0 . e-
O '" => '" =>
0 0 => => i-
N ~ i:l. 0 = i:l. = 'il
--- .... .... <)
0\ - == 0 => == => ~
- 6\ = - .... = ....
--- - Q ~ Q ~ <)
- e e
- 0\
-< -<
tf')
M
~
M
~
o
o
o
o~
00
00
o!::!
00\
o~
tf')~
o~
o ..
M~
~ =
~
..
:;t:
-
Q.
.....
Qi
C.J
Qi
~
Q
Z
....
==
is
y
y
-<
CU
=
==
CU
>
~
til
.~
Q)
:"Sl
ell
== Q)
.S! ~
.... "Cl
Q. ....
.C (/J
y ~
:l Q)
~ ~
cu
'0
Q
U
==
..
.. N
Eo- 0
Q
Z
;,; ~
e ..
CU U
....
.....
CU
==
:::3
N
\0
N
-
~
M
I
o
-
o
VI
VI
o
-
-
I
M
o
o
N
CZl
~
~
";
....
Q
Eo-
e
CU
....
.....
CU
==
:::3
'"
....
=
Q)
e
>-.
..
~
'0
CU
>
'il
y
Q)
Cl:
~
Q
==
Q
Z
e
..
&;:
==
Q
U
Q
Z
....
==
=
Q
y
y
-<
Q
Z
.:.:
==
..
=
..
Q)
>.
..
i:l.
'0
Q
..c::
....
CU
~
!:i
o
ell
....
Q)
p...
s:::
......
';
....
o
Eo<
....
=
e
>-.
..
~
c:
o
~
a.
a.
CO
Q)
:6
15
Q)
E
o
.0
='='5
E 0
lB Q)
0.:6
CO 0
... -
. .E ~
I-c:......
-0.....
~ .- Q)
0::: -"-
W~~
0.=0
<o.c:
I-g-~
Oc:=
Z CO .-
(1)...3:
-O:J
(1)::0
-0.>-
J: .- "'C
I-Q)c:
o CO
IE
coa3
.!!l ~
.!!l"::;
~ IE
Q)
.0
Cl)
~
0...
0\
M
VI
M
<+-.
o
~
ell
~
~
~
CI
~
'3:
c:
o
~
"~
a.
a.
CO
.!!l
..c:
I-
~
U
Q)
,.J::l
U
..
.
.
....... ' Planning Department 0 RIG \ N A l
~ ~~ ~~:~:;~~=[i~~
o~ F!OC727-562-4865
* NOTE: 13 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED
(APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXmLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
CASE #: .e L.5 c:;..0fZ>. '1- j / tJJ:..r
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff Initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
~mAl"~IMi:
~~~~lJilbPJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
NO~~~3
EAST:
P A!\!!\J!"'"
. 'i'\i,'lW.~J
...iTY OF CLEAHVVATER
. i:l . SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED ANO NOTARIZED APPLICATION
. .'. . CJ '. SUBMIT 12 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
" 1) collated, 2}stapled and J}folded sets of site plans
. . ~
Cl.SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE S j€V:;..;.-
(Revised 11/05/02)
- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A APPLICANT, PL\~~~ OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Cod. SocII... 4-202.AJ
::~=~ Jl1~ ~t~8"1t,~ ~\ ~?6?
PHONE NUMBER: ~\ ~ 2. S" I ~ 00 FAX NUMBER: .g \ 'S. ~S- \ b'162...
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
w~ k Dlv
(Must include AlL owners) /
M~ ~~.
-60"/ UJ2.~ ~)/ c,. \
~\ ~ 25't '190'0
/2 ") C;60 <11 c:~
'-\-u\?('
AGENT NAME:
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
1=\
s560h
6'162
\ . (l)rY\
MAILING ADDRESS:
CELL NUMBER:
E-MAil ADDRESS:
, B.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATIO~: (Code Section 4-202.A)
7Ll S- ~~v b~b~
~1)~ (~ ~.l t~ L{ . ~+-~ ~~tk.~
A 5" l2.q~.1 <;; I C;%6h ( ~ S I ~S-(')
l'()~ V~ s,[:2 ~ u'3 ~)
(acres. square eet) /
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): t;.' c..
(number of dwelling units. h rooms or square footage of nonresidenUaI use)
STREET ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
~h I^o-~\o..y'.
Q~ \'1 ~ s2.-- r-
PARCEL NUMBER:
PARCEL SIZE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):00~ds'D II"- \v'\. ~~ CQ.,~ +0 ,s;- b:+- -k c;:~~
(include all requested code deviations; &.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.)
6.t'~c; C;:~"'Q.Q\-~ ~ ~ ~ n~ <:O~D1I'. "2. -2..n3.
h:>~'C) ~ ~ . '" \ ~~'j~
Page 1 of 6 _ Flexible Standard Development Application - Citv of Clearwater
"
.
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHT. S(TDR),AP~~IOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ~. NO .K.. (if-yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents) -
C; -PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
~SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED OR AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY
D. .. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
~ Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1 ~~~.m.",of~~.. "'~~: --C' J:: don"~"" -'L-C~.wN,"'
~<>l:..kt- J--~\ ~..::~~~ 0.~ ~~-'>4....~ ~~~~
~~~ C.+"~Cl~~ ~\~u~ ~ Ct~~~ ~.r5 N)~~
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the approprlate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or signiflCal1l1y
impair the value thereo \.... I'- . n" lit , '\r;
I '=>> ,";Q "^ ~\Q.. ')( I '0 ~
~J' ~J\ ~ cJaI~
3.
In the neighborhood of the proposed
\, \ e... 0.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ~ I
5. T~e proposed development Is consistent with the community charader of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for d~lopment.
~ ~5J C'Q4~re \"L~~ ~ c~o{''E:P 5 ~I" ~ ,v"'-M~
Mo-~~'p~ \ '^ ~ ~("...\e ok ~~~+r -Q~. ~c:..4..h ~
6.
.J
.
.
E.
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
~
~..
~
D
o
D
o
. ."'
SIGNEO AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal. description of property)"'" One ~rtgl~~1 ~12 copl~;
TREE>S.URVEY. (Including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
inCluding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed);
.' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application. the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development
Coordinator and shall be in accordance with aceepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in
determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN. as applicable;
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be Issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
COpy OF RECORDED PLAT as aoolicable'
F"HSITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
: ~SITE PLNi"With the following Information (not to exceed 24" x 36");
. . .'. AifdirTleiislons;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet). and date prepared:
Location map;
Index sheet referencing individual sheets Included in package;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buDdings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and speelmen
trees. including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats. ete;
Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants. storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
_ .' Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot Interior landscaped areas;
Location of all $olld waste containers. recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per
Section 3-201(0)(1) and IndeX#701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offslte storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor fighting fixtures; and
_ . Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
~ SITE DATA.TABi.E-for existing, required, and proposed development. in wriltenltabular (orm:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number ofEXISTlNG dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dweDing units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented In tabular form with the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of aN landscape material;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
FloOr area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
D REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 ~ X 11) and color rendering if possible;
o FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional Information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms:
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and tlrives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified amorist", of all trees 8" DSH or greater. reflecting size. canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
.
..........n....._..!.".;~~ ~LAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (ei f Clearwater Design Criteria Manuai and
~\ \ -~RMWATER PLAN Including e following requirements:
~:~~p~_~~ t_"pmp~_:
. Proposed grading including finished or elevations of all str ures;
_ All adjacent streets and municipal sto ystems; .
Proposed stormwater detention/retention a includi p of b.anK, toe of slope and outlet control struc:ture;
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and ter qu ity; ,..
Signature of Florida registered Professional Eng r on .ali plans and calculations
[J
[J
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
PI I t\-. AN CAPE PLAN:
~ t') Aii exi and proposed structures;
_ Names of utling streets;
Drainage and ntion areas including swales. side slopes and bottom elevations:
Delineation and dl . s of all required perimeter landscape buffers:
Sight visibility triangles,
Delineatio.n and dimensions all parking areas Induding landscaping I
Proposed and required parking ces:
Existing trees on-site and inmedlat adjacent to the site, by s' .es, size and locations, inchlding dripline;
Location, size, description. specificatio nd,quantitles of a idstlng and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and
common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs d
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched andlor s~ an led and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered; . /
Co~dllions of a previous development ~val (e.g. conditio
Irrigation noteS. / .
/
/
REDUCED LANDSCAPE P~to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if
IRRIGATION PLAN (req~ for level two and three approvs~:
COMPREHENSIVE ~DSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable.
/
~nd cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfiRing, mulching and
c
tJ
o
- I.. . _ .'. .. BUJLDING.ELEVATION-PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202A23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as
part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Prqjec:t or a Resldentiallnlill Project.
}/t- BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
Q REDUCED BUILDING ELEVA nONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color
rendering, if possible) as required.
J. t\.--SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806).. . .
~ \ r All EXISTING frees~anding and attached s ns; Provide phot~piis . 'nd dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
'fJ \ removed or to remam. . .' ...... ..... I .
[J All PROPOSED freestanding and attachecl si(! ails including location, size, height, colors, materiafs and drawing
[J
Reducec/ signage proposal (8 % X 11)
prehensive Sign Program application.
[J
Page 4 of 6 - Rexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater
.
.
I . .
K. TRAFFIC 1M CT STUDY: (Section 4-B01.C) ~:.. /
equired If pro vel ment will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
~ ~.. sh., be..... '" !he moot '"'"". . 0"'" olT__''''' .""".." Top Genom' Mao"",. - to S_....01
C of the Community Development Code for exceplions.tothis requiremen .
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and
authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property
described in this application.
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNlY OF PINELlAS
Sworn to and subscribed before me this j;(t'
~'i:z::J:J:t:..L. A.D. 2003 to me
I-trP...J J \ J., 'f(? ,~ is personally
pr uced
identification.
day of
and/of by
know!:!.) has
as
(~'-fJ.!j Y7l~
... My commission expires: ~ a\. Rosalie G. McGinnis
. 'J . My CommIssiOn 00196530
''1''j Explm May 16. 2007
Page 5 of 6 - Aexible standard Development Application - City ot Clearwater
I
1-
...
.
M.
m~AVIT TO~TH~~E~~~: ..
~. ..6.v ~
I
(Names of all property owners)
1. That (I a@e) the owner(s) and record title holder(S) of the following described property (address or general location):
/~c;- ~v 'E?~rL_.~ c&<m~.J~ ~tt~o. '""SS'/~J
I ~
2.
That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
'E<>.~,\,~ %..kJ ~~~ ~ ~-'" ~k 0\"
~ ~~ ~~~ ~ S- ~ 6.~s ~Kgj-~
M~~~
, <;; k+-
3.
That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
as (hlsltheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5, That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application;
p . rty
STATE OF FLORIDA,
6. That (1/W8), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is true a
COUNTY OF P1NELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissione~~ the laws pf th~ State of Florida. on this C;; t i/7 day of
fr:bhe,r . (JniO? personally appeared t:{LIdrt:WE~L..,L~ ~ who having beenfirstdulyswom
Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit tl'Iat helshe s~ . ~
. ('~#m~~~
?J RoeaIie G. """'--is Notary-Public -
My Commission Expires: #'.~ , ..........111
\t ~; My ComrnIasIon oo198S30
01' Expires 18
S'1Ranning DepartmentlAppllcatlon Formsldevelopment teVi_12002 FormsVlexible standllld devefopmsnt appllcation.2002.dOC
Page 6 of 6 - Aexible Standard Development Application - City of Clearwater
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! c-
oo IJ:1
f:: 0.
ro {/}
Z UJ
.>..
Verbena St ~
-0
ro
~
a
-0
W
ro
-0
C
ro
2:
Elofte
%
04
7.-
Mango 8t
Cle arwater
iris St
.;~ ,
o,;>~el
lZ)
'0
rn
c
rn
AsterSt-~
tlJ.
~
La
rwater Beach
Ga,den AP'I
I Apartments
Acacia St
s:
m
:::;
c..
m
(SUBJECT
SITE
rII
.. Somerset Sf
~ Waters
..... bRoyal Canadian ~Edge Motel
~Motel IE!J
I [AJ 'IdS Monaco ~Five Palms
~I t Resort B
~ ~otel -
CleaflllJater Beaoh . .. ~SUrf N Sand Motel
Clearwater Beachr.:i::1 . >
8 ~~biS Motel
@ 2000 M;o,o'ott Cor . andloirls '" u~,; his ,ese rv.d.
Q3
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
DRAWN BY: C.R.
SCAI.E: NOT TO SCALE
HUPP RESIDENCE
745 BAY ESPLANADE
CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA
SITE LOCATION MAP
DATE:
JAN. 17. 2003
W.P.
REPORT NO:
PROJECT NO:
---
~
~.
0..
Z
~
r\a
DATE: JAN. 17. 2003
APPENDIX: A
--
-.
- ---.
I
I
~.........
...-.-..,
---.... ~
-----1
'"
:'
\
.
.
CITY OF CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 26, 2003
Mr. Andrew Hupp
745 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, FL 33767
RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2003-11 055 at 745 Bay Esplanade
Dear Mr. Hupp:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community
Development Code. On December 23, 2003, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed
your application for Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the front (west) setback
along Bay Esplanade from 25 feet to 15 feet and front (north) setback along Iris Street from 25 feet to
five feet to a proposed garage addition, in association with a single-family residence, as a Residential
Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. The DRC recommended approval of the
application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with Detached Dwellings criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C;
2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and
3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area.
Conditions for Approval:
1. That the sidewalk along Bay Esplanade maintain alignment;
2. That a four-foot sidewalk be provided along Iris Street (5' if adjacent curb);
3. That the driveways are redesigned so parked vehicles do not impede pedestrian traffic on sidewalk;
4. That a pair of 20' x 20' sight distance triangles must be shown on the site plan;
5. That a separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of
the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city;
6. That the Iris Street road extension be constructed in accordance with City Standards;
7. That a 20-foot minimum length be provided at north driveway from edge of sidewalk to face of
garage; and
8. That existing and proposed Impervious Surface Ratio calculations be provided.
I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve
your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above eight conditions. The approval is
based on and must adhere to the site plan and application received November 19,2003.
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
December 26, 2003
Mr. Hupp - Page Two
Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of
Flexible Standard Development approval (December 26,2004). All required certificates of occupancy
shall be obtained
within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with
successive owners.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Development Review
Specialist, at 727-562-4604. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myclearwater.com. * Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
~fL
Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP
Planning Director
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (LMDR)\Bay Esplanade 745
Development Order.doc
..
<I
.
.
DRC Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Applicant:
Address:
December 23, 2003
FLS2003-11055
Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Hupp
745 Bay Esplanade
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DRAFT STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Standard Development approval Flexible Standard Development approval
for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet and front (north)
setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to a proposed garage addition, in association with a
single-family residence, as a residential infill project, located at 745 Bay
Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR), Residential Urban Classification,
(RU)
PROPERTY USE:
Current Use:
Proposed Use:
Single Family residential
Single-Family residential
ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES:
North:
West:
East:
South:
Single-family residential
Single- family residential
Preservation - Intercoastal Waterway
Single-family residential
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIA TE VICINITY:
Single-family dwellings dominate the immediate vicinity.
ANALYSIS:
0.23 acres located at the intersection of Bay Esplanade and Iris Street. The parcel is located within a residentially
developed area of single-family homes. The existing single story, single-family residence is well maintained and
minimally landscaped.
It will comply with the maximum height regulation of 30 feet. The lot is located at the corner of Bay Esplanade and
Iris Street there are two front setbacks. The applicant provided a block survey revealing existing front setbacks along
Bay Esplanade Street at 25 feet or less for neighboring dwelling units to property line. The proposed multi-story
single-family residence will be placed on the site consistently with regards to the surrounding vicinity to front setbacks.
The development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Low Medium Density
Residential District.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-
913.A) and Detached Dwelling, Residential Infill criteria (Section 2-203.C) have been met.
CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS:
There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site.
~~~~~~
~o~ ~,
S:\Planning Department\C D Wtandard Flex\Pending Cases\] - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (LMDR)\Bay
Esplanade 745 Staff Report.doc- Page 1
't
.
.
STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL:
STANDARD REQUIRED! EXISTING PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
PERMITTED
MAXIMUM 7.5 dwelling units One dwelling One dwelling [X]
DENSITY unit unit
IMPERVIOUS ~f~~ ~l~~ ~l~~ (~1
SURFACE
RATIO (ISR)
LOT AREA 10,080 square feet 10,080 square 10,080 square [X]
(minimum) feet feet
LOT WIDTH 50 feet West: 96 Feet West: 96 Feet [X]
(minimum) North: 111 Feet North: 111 Feet
FRONT West: 25 feet West: 23.5feet West: 15 feet [X]
SETBACK North: 25 feet North: 6.98 feet North: 5.16 feet
REAR 25 feet N!A 25 feet [X]
SETBACK
SIDE SETBACK 5 feet 5+ feet 13.96 feet [X]
HEIGHT 30 feet 14 feet 28 feet [X]
(maximum)
PARKING 2 per unit 2 spaces 3 spaces (garage) [X]
SPACES
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR LMDR DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS; (Section 2-203.C):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Consistent Inconsistent
Single-family detached dwellings are the
only permitted use eligible for residential
infill project application;
[X]
[ ]
The development or redevelopment of the
parcel proposed for development is
otherwise impractical without deviations
from the intensity and other development
standards;
[X]
[ ]
The development of the parcel proposed for
development as a residential infill project
will not materially reduce the fair market
value of abutting properties;
[X]
[ ]
The uses within the residential infill project
are otherwise permitted in the district;
[X]
[ ]
The uses within the residential infill project
are compatible with adjacent land uses;
[X]
[ ]
S:\Planning Department\C D BlStandard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (LMDR)\Bay
Esplanade 745 Staff Report. doc- Page 2
-
.
6.
The development of the parcel proposed for
development as a residential infill project
will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development;
7.
The design of the proposed residential infill
project creates a form and function which
enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development and the City of Clearwater
as a whole;
Flexibility in regard to lot width, required
setbacks, height, off-street parking access
or other development standards are justified
by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of
Clearwater as a whole.
8.
GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
1.
Development of the land will be III
harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage,
density and character of adjacent
properties.
2.
Development will not hinder or discourage
development and use of adjacent land and
buildings or significantly impair the value
thereof.
3.
Development will not adversely affect the
health or safety of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood.
4.
Development IS designed to mIlllrruze
traffic congestion.
5.
Development IS consistent with the
community character of the immediate
vicinity.
6.
Design of the proposed development
mIlllmIzes adverse effects, including
visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of
operation impacts on adjacent properties.
[X]
.
[X]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Consistent Inconsistent
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
S:\Planning Department\C D BlStandard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - up for the Next DRC\Bay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (LMDR)\Bay
Esplanade 745 Staff Report.doc- Page 3
,.
.
.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 18,2003. The
Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development application for reduction to
the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet and front (north) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to a proposed garage
addition, in association with a single-family residence, as a residential infill project, located at 745 Bay Esplanade,
under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. on the following bases:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Detached Dwelling per Section 2-203.C.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per
Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff:
John Schodtler, Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Department\C D B\Standard Flex\Pending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DR0J3ay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (LMDR)\Bay
Esplanade 745 Staff Report.doc- Page 4
.
.
1,,"III~
..'~~~LOF Tift:;'"
~t~ 1)"",u~~~~~7p-
,~,\1. ~~~-'
~;:-:;.\.~ \ L ~.. -t 0 ':.
....~\.,,~ i' ..... '-
~C":I ~ _\ .... , ~
"'r::~c",~:c-~~~
..~':. =~. .;::-.1\
.....: _ __~N ~~
':.~.A"",,~-=~ "~,,
''';a'$;;;:UII''~'~'\''''
."'##.l" TE~t,....
#'4fII"
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
loNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 12, 2003
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 745 Bay Esplanade (FLS2003-11055).
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 745 Bay Esplanade, the City of Clearwater Planning Department
gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The
request is for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet and front (north) setback from
25 feet to 5 feet to a proposed garage addition, in association with a single-family residence, as a
residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
On December 23, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff)
will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community
Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a
Development Order approving, approving with conditions or denying the application.
The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application.. You may phone me at
727-562-4604 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments
to be considered in the City's review of the application.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners
within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the
Development Review Committee meeting (December 23,2003). An appeal must be filed, including an
appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through
the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.com or my direct e-mail addressisischodtl@clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
~.~-t~
J o~ - Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D BlStandard FleNending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRClDEC 2J1lJay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (lMDRNJay
Esplanade 745 Notification Letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAlvlILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILLJONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND MFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
.
.
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
LoNG RANGE PlANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
December 1, 2003
Mr. Andrew Hupp
745 Bay Esplanade
Clearwater, FL 33767
RE: Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15
feet and front (north) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet for a proposed single family residence, as a
residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
Dear Mr. Hupp:
The Planning staff has reviewed your application for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15
feet and front (north) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet to a proposed garage addition in association with a
proposed single-family residence, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C. After a preliminary review of
the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is mostly complete.
Please provide the following:
1. The Residential Infill criteria form enclosed; and
2. Photographs showing reduced front setback characteristics.
The application has been entered into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number:
FLS2003-11055.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December 23,
2003 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal
Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please
call Sherrie Nicodemus, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the
meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as
applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the committee may have regarding your
application. Additional comments will be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4604.
Sincerely yours,
~~~~
J oM Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning DepartmenflC D B\Standard FleXlPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRClDEC 2J\Bay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (LMDRfJ3ay esplanade
745 complete letter. doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER * BILL]ONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATNE ACTION EMPLOYER"
e
"\ ,....
e
CITY OF
CLEARWATER
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REvIEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
December 12, 2003
RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 745 Bay Esplanade (FLS2003-11055).
To Surrounding Property Owners:
As a property owner within 200 feet of 745 Bay Esplanade, the City of Clearwater Planning Department
gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development has been filed for that property. The
request is for reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 15 feet and front (north) setback from
25 feet to 5 feet to a proposed garage addition, in association with a single-family residence, as a
residential infill project, under the provisions of Section 2-203.C.
On December 23, 2003, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staft)
will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community
Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a
Development Order approving, approvine with conditions or denying the application.
The City encourages you to participate in the review process of this application.. You may phone me at
727-562-4604 for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments
to be considered in the City's review of the application.
An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners
within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the
Development Review Committee meeting (December 23, 2003). An appeal must be filed, including an
appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order.
Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. Please do not
hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. You may access our Planning Department through
the City's website: www.clearwater-fl.comor my direct e-mail addressislschodtl@clearwater-fl.com.
Sincerely,
~'~1~
J o~- Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
S:\Planning Departmenf\C D B\Standard FleXlPending Cases\3 - Up for the Next DRC\DEC 23\Bay Esplanade 745 - Hupp (LMDR}l.Bay
Esplanade 745 Notification Letter.doc
BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER
HoYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER
FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER .. -0 _ BILLJONSON, COMMISSIONER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
J
~II
HUPP REALTY A~SORS
607 WEST BAY STREET. TAMPA, FLORIDA 33606
Phone: (813) 251-9900. Fax: (813) 251-6962
www.hupprealty.com
December 15, 2003
Mr. John Schodtler
Development Review Specialist
City of Clearwater Planning Department
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
RE: Flexible Standard Development approval for reduction to the front (west) setback
from 25 feet to 15 feet and front (north) setback from 25 feet to 5 feet for a
proposed single family residence, as a residential infill project, under the
provisions of Section 2-203.C.
Dear Mr. Schodtler:
Per your letter dated December 1, 2003, enclosed please find the requested
information pertaining to the above referenced matter.
Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
AJH:rgm
enc.
.
.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable
documents)
c. PR
F OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
OPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see
D. WRITTEN SUB ITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete respon s to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development 0 e land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it
is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or disco age the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or sa y or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
use.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of t parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hou
on adjacent properties.
Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1 . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of
abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
~ 0I6.-\~"'~ ~\- = ~c:;;F \'1'-(0 ~~~~''''l~ Io~so~
~'" 0- \o~ t~. ~ ~ ~'OOo SF ~"'^-~ ..u~ ~:f:k~ .Q.",~lRs
w\,tl (liI)#I~~~\.oS~ ("bt- k ~v<t\~~~,^~\
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
~ tJs!L ~ 0. t~~ a~ 9.~e - .Q.~S,,;y ~'i)!V'.~
~O),fI\'~ ',,^ ~--..-.. ~ ~~
~~ '"
4.
The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
~ cJS/l- '" C, a ~~~ .c___~ v ~ ~ck ~ ~
'> '^- ~ r'-<2.~~S-,^~. ./
~ \ Ii c)-.!:12-
/
/
~ <(~U~
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole \.
MJL~Il..o.o" I ~-"",L c.~". ",'L ... ~,..k.,.,.,\ 8,~ ~&"t c.~"<t
~&"'~~~~~ ~ ~~~\~~ .w~ ~~~~sJ1. ~
a
\
\oClV\c...l. N'O.rl<.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill
proposed for development
E.
7.
o STORMWATER PLAN including the folio equirements:
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond al erty lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank,
Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality;
Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations
o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable
Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application Single Family Residentiallnfill Project- City of Clearwater